e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for
the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 |
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-6365
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
41-0919654 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
7900 Xerxes Avenue South - Suite 1800, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(952) 835-1874
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $0.33 1/3 Par Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 30 2008, the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second
fiscal quarter, the approximate aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held
by non-affiliates of the registrant was $570,254,000 (based on the closing price of $20.00 per
share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market as of that date).
As of April 1, 2009, there were 27,781,488 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $0.33 1/3 par
value per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required in Part III hereof is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement
for the registrants 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Form 10-K.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota in 1949.
Through its subsidiaries, the Company believes it is a world leader in certain technologies
involving the design and development of value-added glass products, services and systems. Unless
the context otherwise requires, the terms Company, Apogee, we, us and our as used herein
refer to Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The Company is comprised of two reporting segments to match the markets they serve:
|
|
|
The Architectural Products and Services segment designs, engineers, fabricates, installs,
maintains and renovates the walls of glass and windows comprising the outside skin and
entrances of commercial and institutional buildings. For fiscal 2009, our Architectural
Products and Services segment accounted for 92 percent of our net sales. |
|
|
|
|
The Large-Scale Optical Technologies segment manufactures value-added glass and acrylic
products primarily for the custom picture framing market and commercial optics. For fiscal
2009, our Large-Scale Optical Technologies segment accounted for eight percent of our net
sales. |
Financial information about the Companys segments can be found in Note 17 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Company contained elsewhere in this report.
On December 21, 2007, the Company acquired 100 percent of the stock of Tubelite, Inc., the results
of operations for which were included in our Architectural Products and Services segment from the
closing date. For further information, see Acquisition of Tubelite below.
Products
Apogee provides distinctive value-added glass solutions for enclosing commercial buildings and
framing art. We operate in two segments as described in the following paragraphs.
Architectural Products and Services (Architectural) Segment. The Architectural segment primarily
fabricates, installs, maintains and renovates the outside skin of commercial buildings. Through
complex processes, we add ultra-thin coatings to plain architectural glass to create colors and
energy efficiency, especially important with the industry trend of green buildings. We also
laminate layers of glass and vinyl to create glass that helps protect against hurricanes and bomb
blasts. Glass can also be tempered to provide additional strength. We have the ability to design,
build and install windows, curtainwall, storefront and entrances using our coated glass and metal
products or those supplied by others. We also provide finishing services for the metal and plastic
components used to frame architectural glass and other products.
Our product choices allow architects to create distinctive looks for office towers, hotels,
education facilities, health care facilities and government buildings, as well as condominiums,
and our services allow our customers to meet the timing and cost requirements of their jobs.
3
The following table describes the products and services provided by the Architectural segment.
|
|
|
|
|
Products and |
|
Product |
|
|
Services |
|
Attributes |
|
Description |
Architectural Glass
Fabrication
|
|
High-Performance Glass
|
|
We offer a wide
selection of glass
colors,
silk-screening and
energy efficiency
properties.
High-performance
glass is typically
fabricated into
custom insulating
units and/or
laminated products. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum Framing
Systems
|
|
Standard, Custom and
Engineered-to-Order
|
|
Varying degrees of
customization of our
window, storefront,
entrance and
curtainwall systems
are available
depending on the
customers project
requirements. We
offer a comprehensive
list of design,
engineering,
procurement and
fabrication
alternatives. Our
window systems can be
operable or
non-operable. Our
curtainwall systems
may be unitized (shop
fabricated) or field
fabricated. Depending
on the requirements,
we apply a wide
selection of colored
paint to aluminum
window frames,
curtainwall systems
and other components.
We also use anodizing
to create a strong,
weather-resistant
film of aluminum
oxide, often colored,
at the surface of the
aluminum. In some
cases, we also apply
UV protection and
durable paint to
polyvinyl chloride
parts, such as
interior shutters. |
|
|
|
|
|
Glass Installation
|
|
New Construction,
Renovation and
Service
|
|
We install
curtainwall, window,
storefront and
entrance systems for
non-monumental, new
commercial and
institutional
buildings, and for
renovation projects.
In-house engineering
capabilities allow us
to meet the
architects design
requirement;
duplicate the
original design to
maintain the
historical appearance
of a building; or
create a completely
new appearance for
renovated buildings.
We also offer 24-hour
complete repair and
replacement of
damaged glass,
including commercial
glass replacements,
repair of doors,
custom mirror and
security glass.
. |
All of the businesses within the Architectural segment manufacture their products by fabricating
glass and/or metals in a job-shop environment. Products are shipped to the job site or other
location where further assembly or installation may be required.
Large-Scale Optical Technologies (LSO) Segment. The LSO segment primarily provides coated glass
and acrylic for use in custom picture framing applications. The variables in the glass used for
picture framing products are the size, thickness and coating to give the glass ultra-violet (UV)
protection and/or anti-reflective properties.
|
|
|
|
|
Products and |
|
Product |
|
|
Services |
|
Attributes |
|
Description |
Value-Added Picture
Framing Glass and
Acrylic
|
|
UV, Anti-Reflective
and/ or Security
Features
|
|
Our coatings reduce
the reflectivity of
picture framing glass
and protect pictures
and art from the
suns damaging UV
rays. Anti-reflective
coatings on acrylic
reduce glare and
static charge on the
surface. |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Optics
|
|
Reflective and
Transmission Security
|
|
Our coatings also
reduce the
reflectivity and
transmissivity of
products used in
commercial optics
markets. Applications
in these markets
include privacy
filters and may
include markets such
as marine and
aircraft gauges and
medical devices. |
Markets and Distribution Channels
Architectural Segment. The market for Architectural products and services is a subset of the
construction industry and is differentiated by building type, geographic location, project size
and level of customization required. Published market data is not available for the market
segments that we serve; however, we estimate market size by analyzing overall construction
industry data.
Building type The construction industry dynamics are typically represented by
residential construction and non-residential construction, which includes commercial, industrial
and institutional construction. Apogee is well positioned as a leading supplier of architectural
glass products and services to the non-residential construction industry. Our architectural glass
products and services are used in commercial and institutional buildings for office towers,
hotels, education facilities, health care facilities and government buildings, as well as high-end
condominiums.
Geographic location We supply architectural glass fabrication products primarily to the
U.S. market, with some international distribution of our high-performance architectural glass. We
estimate the U.S. market for architectural glass
4
fabrication in
commercial buildings is approximately $2.0 billion in annual sales. Our aluminum framing systems,
including standard windows, storefront and entrances, are marketed in the United States, where we
estimate the market size is approximately $3.0 billion in annual sales. We estimate the U.S.
market for installation services is approximately $12.0 billion in annual sales. Within the
installation services market, Apogee is one of only a few companies to have a national presence,
with offices in 11 locations serving multiple U.S. markets. These areas represent approximately 20
percent of the total installation market. Installation of building glass in new commercial and
institutional construction projects is the primary focus of our business; we also offer glass
services and retrofitting or renovating the outside skin of older commercial and institutional
buildings.
Project size The projects on which our Architectural segment businesses bid and work
vary in size. Our aluminum framing systems and glass installation products and services, in
particular, are targeted toward smaller and mid-size projects, while our high-performance
architectural glass fabrication products are often supplied to monumental, high-profile projects.
We estimate that we are awarded over a 70 percent share of the high-profile architectural glass
projects that we target.
Level of customization Most projects have some degree of customization, as the end
product or service is based on customer specifications; the only constant is the substrates of the
products and the processes we utilize to fabricate, manufacture or install the products. However,
within our aluminum framing systems businesses, we produce glass windows and storefront and
entrance products in standard and modified standard configurations.
Customers and marketing Our customers and those that influence the projects include
architects, building owners, general contractors and glazing subcontractors in the
non-residential, commercial construction market. Our high-performance architectural glass is
marketed using a direct sales force and independent representatives. We market our standard
window, curtainwall, storefront and entrance systems using a combination of direct sales,
distribution and independent representatives. Our installation, renovation and repair services are
marketed by a direct sales force primarily in the major metropolitan areas we serve in the United
States.
LSO Segment. The Companys Tru Vue brand is one of the largest domestically manufactured brands
for value-added glass for the custom picture framing market. Under this brand, products are
distributed primarily in North America through mass merchandisers as well as through independent
distributors which supply national and regional chains and local picture framing shops. The
Company has also been successful in supplying products directly to museums and public and private
galleries. We also have limited distribution in Europe, Australia and New Zealand through
independent distributors.
Through the Companys leadership, the custom picture framing industry continues to convert from
clear glass to value-added picture framing glass and acrylic, a trend that is expected to continue
and has helped offset market softness over the past several years. We believe todays market for
custom picture framing glass to be approximately 100 million square feet annually, of which
approximately 30 million square feet are value-added, our target sector. We believe that our
market share in this sector exceeds 75 percent.
We sell our commercial optics products to original equipment manufacturers.
Warranties
We offer product warranties which we believe are competitive for the markets in which those
products are sold. The nature and extent of these warranties depend upon the product, the market
and, in some cases, the customer being served. We generally offer warranties from two to 10 years
for our architectural glass, curtainwall and window system products, while we offer warranties of
two years or less on our other products. In the event of a claim against a product for which we
have received a warranty from the supplier, we will pass the claim back to our supplier. We carry
liability insurance with very high deductibles for product failures and reserve for warranty
exposures, as our insurance does not cover warranty claims. There can be no assurance that our
insurance will be sufficient to cover all product failure claims in the future; that the costs of
this insurance and the related deductibles will not increase materially; or that liability
insurance for product failures will be available on terms acceptable to the Company in the future.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Materials used within the Architectural segment include raw glass, aluminum billet and extrusions,
vinyl, metal targets, insulated glass spacer frames, silicone, plastic extrusions, desiccant,
chemicals, paints, lumber and urethane. All of these materials are readily available from a number
of sources, and no supplier delays or shortages are anticipated. While certain glass products may
only be available at certain times of the year, all standard glass types and colors are available
throughout the year in reasonable quantities from multiple suppliers. Glass manufacturers have
applied surcharges to the cost of glass
5
over the past several years to help offset increases in
energy and fuel costs. We have also seen recent volatility in the cost of
aluminum that is used in our window, storefront, entrance and curtainwall systems. Where
applicable, we have passed the changes in cost of materials on to our customers in the form of
pricing adjustments and/or surcharges. Chemicals purchased range from commodity to specifically
formulated chemistries.
Materials used within the LSO segment include glass, hard-coated acrylic, acrylic substrates,
coating materials and chemicals. This segment has also incurred energy surcharges from glass
manufacturers over the past several years. Historically, we have passed on these costs to our
customers in the form of moderate price increases where possible.
The Company believes a majority of its raw materials are available from a variety of domestic
sources.
Trademarks and Patents
The Company has several trademarks and trade names which it believes have significant value in the
marketing of its products, including APOGEE®. Trademark registrations in the United States are
generally for a term of 10 years, renewable every 10 years as long as the trademark is used in the
regular course of trade. Within the Architectural segment, VIRACON®, LINETEC®, FINISHER OF
CHOICE®, VIRAGUARD®, WAUSAU WINDOW AND WALL SYSTEMS®, WAUSAU METALS®, ADVANTAGE WAUSAU®,
GUARDVUE®, STORMGUARD®, TUBELITE®, MAXBLOCK®, GO WITH THE GREEN®, HARMON GLASS®, THE LEADER IN
GLASS FABRICATION® and VIRACONSULTING® are registered trademarks of the Company. HARMON,
ADVANTAGE, VIRACON VUE-50, VOE-50, 300ES, FORCE-FRONT, and THERMAL-BLOCK are unregistered
trademarks of the Company.
Within the LSO segment, TRUVUE®, TRUGUARD®, CONSERVATION CLEAR®, CONSERVATION SERIES®,
CONSERVATION REFLECTION CONTROL®, CONSERVATION ULTRACLEAR®, GALLERY COLLECTION®, SCRATCH GUARD®,
SUNSCREEN FOR YOUR ART®, MUSEUM GLASS®, MUSEUM SECURITY®, MUSEUM SERIES®, IMAGE PERFECT®, OPTIUM®,
REFLECTION CONTROL®, AR REFLECTION FREE®, TRU VUE AR®, OPTIUM ACRYLIC®, OPTIUM MUSEUM ACRYLIC®,
PRICING FOR PROFIT®, PREMIUM CLEAN®, VIRATEC® and CONSERVATION MASTERPIECE® are registered
trademarks. REFLECTION FREE ACRYLIC, MUSEUM ACRYLIC, PRESERVATION CLEAR, THE TRUGUARD
STANDARD, PRESERVATION MASTERPIECE, PRESERVATION REFLECTION CONTROL, TRU-VUE REFLECTION
FREE, ULTRACLEAR and MUSEUM SECURITY GLASS are unregistered trademarks of the Company.
The Company has several patents pertaining to our glass coating methods and products, including
our UV coating and etch processes for anti-reflective glass for the picture framing industry.
Despite being a point of differentiation from its competitors, no single patent is considered to
be material to the Company.
Seasonality
Within the Architectural segment, there is a slight seasonal effect following the commercial
construction industry, with higher demand May through December. The construction industry is
highly cyclical in nature and can be influenced differently by the effects of the localized
economy in geographic markets.
Within the LSO segment, picture framing glass sales tend to increase in the September to December
timeframe. However, the timing of customer promotional activities may offset some of this seasonal
impact.
Working Capital Requirements
Within the Architectural segment, receivables relating to contractual retention amounts can be
outstanding throughout the project duration. Payment terms offered to our customers are similar to
those offered by others in the industry. Inventory requirements are not significant to the
businesses within this segment since we make-to-order rather than build-to-stock for the majority
of our products. As a result, inventory levels follow the customer demand for the products
produced.
Since the LSO segment builds to stock for the majority of its products, it requires greater
inventory levels to meet the demands of its customers.
6
Dependence on a Single Customer
We do not have any one customer that exceeds 10 percent of the Companys consolidated revenues.
However, there are important customers within each of our segments; the loss of one or more
customers could have an adverse effect on the Company.
Backlog
At February 28, 2009, the Companys total backlog of orders considered to be firm was $317.4
million, compared with $512.6 million at March 1, 2008. Of these amounts, approximately $316.2
million and $510.9 million of the orders were in the Architectural segment at February 28, 2009
and March 1, 2008, respectively. We expect to produce and ship $237.7 million, or 75 percent, of
the Companys February 28, 2009 backlog in fiscal 2010 compared to $369.8 million, or 72 percent
of the March 1, 2008 backlog that was expected to be produced and shipped in fiscal 2009.
The Company views backlog as an important statistic in evaluating the level of sales activity and
short-term sales trends in its business. However, as backlog is only one indicator, and is not an
effective indicator of the ultimate profitability of the Companys sales, the Company does not
believe that backlog should be used as the sole indicator of future earnings of the Company.
Competitive Conditions
Architectural Segment. The markets served by the businesses within the Architectural segment are
very competitive, price and lead-time sensitive, and are affected by changes in the North American
commercial construction industry as well as changes in general economic conditions, including:
interest rates, credit availability for commercial construction projects, material costs,
employment rates, office vacancy rates, building construction starts and office absorption rates.
As each of these economic indicators moves favorably, our businesses typically experience sales
growth, and vice-versa. The recent trends in the U.S. and world economies have had a significant
adverse impact on the commercial construction industry as a whole. As a result, the competitive
environment in which the Architectural segment operates has become more competitive, increasing
the number of re-bid construction projects and amount of time between bidding and award of a
project, reducing selling prices and causing competitors to expand the geographic scope and type
of projects on which they bid. The companies within the Architectural segment primarily serve the
custom portion of the commercial construction market, which is generally highly fragmented and
where the primary competitive factors are price, product quality, reliable service, on-time
delivery, warranty and the ability to provide technical engineering and design services. We
believe we are in the early stages of an increasing trend in commercial construction, building
with energy efficient or green building products. This has the potential to increase demand for
some of our segments products and services due to the premium energy-efficiency properties and
custom aesthetics. The potential for increased renovation of the exteriors of commercial and
institutional buildings for improved energy efficiency may also offset some of these competitive
pressures.
The Architectural segment must maintain significant relationships with general contractors, who
are normally each business direct or indirect customers, and architects throughout a construction
project. This is due to the high degree of dependence on the general contractors and architects
for project initiation and development of specifications. Additionally, the timing of a project is
dependent on the general contractors schedule and ability to maintain this schedule. If a general
contractor fails to keep a construction project on its established timeline, the timing and
profitability of the project for our installation business could be negatively impacted.
We believe that our competition does not provide the same level of custom-coatings to the market,
but regional glass fabricators can provide somewhat similar products with similar attributes. They
incorporate high performance, post-temperable glass products, procured from primary glass
suppliers, into their insulated glass products. The availability of these products has enabled the
regional fabricators in some cases to bid on more complex projects than in the past. Since we
typically target the more complex projects, of which there are fewer in the market, we have
recently encountered significant competition from these suppliers. Conversely, as the commercial
construction cycle slows and demand for high-end products is lower, our fabrication business
increasingly competes for business at the lower end of the high-performance spectrum where these
regional fabricators vigorously compete.
The commercial window manufacturing market is highly fragmented, and we compete against several
major aluminum window and storefront manufacturers in various market niches. With window products
at the high-end of the performance scale and one of the industrys best standard window warranties
for repair or replacement of defective product, we effectively leverage a reputation for
engineering quality and delivery dependability into a position as a preferred provider for
high-performance products. Our standard window business and storefront and entrance business
typically compete on quality and service levels, price, lead-time and delivery services. Within
the architectural finishing market, we compete against regional paint and anodizing companies,
typically on delivery and price. With the slowdown in the commercial markets, there is a higher
level of competition for these products.
7
When providing glass installation and services, we largely compete against local and regional
construction companies and installation contractors where the primary competitive factors are
quality engineering, service and price.
LSO Segment. Product attributes, pricing, quality, marketing, and marketing services and support
are the primary competitive factors in the markets within the LSO segment. The Companys
competitive strengths include our excellent relationships with our customers and the product
performance afforded by our proprietary and/or patented processes. While there is significant
price sensitivity in regard to sales of clear glass to picture framers, there is less price
sensitivity on our value-added glass products since there is less competition for these products.
This segment has few competitors in North America for value-added picture framing glass products,
but we compete against many suppliers of clear glass. Our customers selection of value-added
products is driven by product attributes, price, quality, service and capacity.
Research and Development
The amount spent on research and development activities over the past three fiscal years was $9.3
million, $11.1 million and $11.7 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Of this
amount, $6.3 million, $9.9 million and $10.7 million, respectively, was focused primarily upon
design of custom window and curtainwall systems in accordance with customer specifications and is
included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Environment
We use hazardous materials in our manufacturing operations, and have air and water emissions that
require controls. As a result, we are subject to stringent federal, state and local regulations
governing the storage, use and disposal of wastes. We contract with outside vendors to collect and
dispose of waste at our production facilities in compliance with applicable environmental laws. In
addition, we have procedures in place that we believe enable us to properly manage the regulated
materials used in our manufacturing processes and wastes created by the production processes, and
we have implemented a program to monitor our compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
Although we believe we are currently in material compliance with such laws and regulations,
current or future laws and regulations could require us to make substantial expenditures for
compliance with chemical exposure, waste treatment or disposal regulations. During fiscal 2009,
2008 and 2007, we spent approximately $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively,
at facilities to reduce wastewater solids and further reduce hazardous air emissions. We expect to
incur costs to continue to comply with laws and regulations in the future for our ongoing
manufacturing operations but do not expect these to be material to our financial statements.
As part of the acquisition of Tubelite, Inc. (Tubelite) on December 21, 2007, the Company acquired
a manufacturing facility which has a history of environmental conditions. We believe that Tubelite
is a responsible party for certain historical environmental conditions, and the Company intends
to remediate those conditions. The Company believes the remediation activities can be conducted
without significant disruption to manufacturing operations at this facility. As part of the
purchase price allocation, the Company recorded $2.5 million in environmental reserves. As of
February 28, 2009, the environmental reserve balance was $2.3 million.
Employees
The Company employed 4,422 and 5,438 persons on February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008, respectively.
At February 28, 2009, 784 of these employees were represented by labor unions. The Company is a
party to approximately 50 collective bargaining agreements with several different unions. The
number of collective bargaining agreements to which the Company is a party varies with the number
of cities in which our glass installation and services business has active construction contracts.
The Company considers its employee relations to be very good, even in light of volume-related
workforce reductions in the later half of fiscal 2009, and has not recently experienced any loss
of workdays due to strike. We are highly dependent upon the continued employment of certain
technical and management personnel.
Acquisition of Tubelite
On December 21, 2007, we purchased 100 percent of the stock of Tubelite, Inc. for $45.7 million,
including transaction costs of $1.0 million and net of cash acquired of $0.9 million. Tubelite
fabricates aluminum storefront, entrance and curtainwall products for the U.S. commercial
construction industry. The purchase is part of our strategy to grow our presence in commercial
architectural markets and is reported within our Architectural segment for the period subsequent
to the
acquisition date. Item 8, Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contains
further information regarding this acquisition.
8
Sale of Businesses
During fiscal 2007, we announced our intention to discontinue the manufacturing of automotive
replacement glass products and to sell the remaining portion of our Auto Glass segment that
manufactured and sold original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket replacement windshields for
the recreational vehicle and bus markets. We restated the consolidated financial statements to show
the results of the Auto Glass segment in discontinued operations. The sale of certain assets
related to the business was completed during the third quarter of fiscal 2008, resulting in a
pre-tax gain of $5.8 million. The fiscal 2008 gain is included in earnings from discontinued
operations in our consolidated results of operations.
Further information regarding other transactions the Company has completed is provided under
Discontinued Operations in Item 7 and in Item 8, Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Foreign Operations and Export Sales
During the years ended February 28, 2009, March 1, 2008 and March 3, 2007, the Companys export
sales, principally from the sale of architectural glass, amounted to approximately $73.2 million,
$71.4 million and $57.3 million or 8 percent, 8 percent and 7 percent of net sales, respectively.
Available Information
The Company maintains a website at www.apog.com. Through a link to a third-party content provider,
this corporate website provides free access to the Companys Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and, if applicable, amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic
filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also
available on our website are various corporate governance documents, including our Code of
Business Ethics and Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters for the Audit,
Compensation, Finance and Enterprise Risk, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed below, or elsewhere in the Form 10-K or
our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also
materially impair our business operations.
Operational Risks
Architectural Segment
The Architectural segment designs, engineers, fabricates, installs, maintains and renovates the
walls of glass, windows, storefront and entrances comprising the outside skin of commercial and
institutional buildings. This segment has tended to lag the North American commercial construction
industry cycle by approximately nine months. There can be no assurance the trends experienced by
the segment will continue.
The Architectural segments markets are very competitive and actions of competitors or new market
entrants could result in a loss of customers that would negatively impact revenues and earnings.
The markets that the Architectural segment serves are product-attribute, price and lead-time
sensitive. The segment competes with several large, integrated glass manufacturers, numerous
specialty, architectural glass and window fabricators, and major contractors and subcontractors.
Some of our competitors may have greater financial or other resources than the Company. Changes in
our competitors products, prices or services could negatively impact our market share, revenues
and margins.
Global economic conditions and the cyclical nature of the North American commercial construction
industry could have an adverse impact on the profitability of this segment. There has traditionally
been a lag between the general domestic economy and the commercial construction industry, and an
additional approximate nine-month lag as it relates to our products and services. Our Architectural
segment businesses are primarily impacted by changes in the North American commercial construction
industry, including unforeseen delays in project timing and work flow. These and other economic
conditions could impact the overall commercial construction industry and may adversely impact the
markets we serve or the timing of the lag, resulting in lower revenues and earnings.
9
The Architectural segment results could be adversely impacted by product quality and performance
reliability problems. We manufacture and/or install a significant portion of our products based on
specific requirements of each of our customers. We believe that future orders of our products or
services will depend on our ability to maintain the performance, reliability and quality standards
required by our customers. If our products or services have performance, reliability or quality
problems, we may experience delays in the collection of accounts receivable, higher manufacturing
or installation costs, additional warranty and service expense, and reduced, cancelled or
discontinued orders. Additionally, performance, reliability or quality claims from our customers,
with or without merit, could result in costly and time-consuming litigation that could require
significant time and attention of management and involve significant monetary damages that could
negatively impact our financial results.
The Architectural results could be adversely impacted by capacity utilization and changes in
technology impacting capacity utilization. The Architectural segments near-term performance
depends, to a significant degree, on its ability to fully utilize capacity at its production
facilities. The failure to successfully utilize and manage capacity in the future, especially in
the down cycle, could adversely affect our operating results. Additionally, advances in product or
process technologies on the part of existing or prospective competitors could have a significant
impact on our ability to utilize our capacity and, therefore, have an adverse impact on our
operating results.
The Architectural results could be adversely impacted by installation issues. The Companys
installation and renovation business typically is awarded as a fixed-price contract. Often, bids
are required before all aspects of a construction project are known. An underestimate in the amount
of labor required and/or cost of materials for a project, a change in the timing of the delivery of
product, difficulties or errors in execution, or significant delays could result in failure to
achieve the expected results. Any such issues could result in losses on individual contracts that
could impact our operating results.
Large-Scale Optical Technologies (LSO)
The LSO segment develops and produces applications that enhance the visual performance of products
for picture framing and commercial optics. In the past, the revenue and profitability of this
segment have been inconsistent from year to year. Over the last several years, the segment has
transitioned away from consumer electronics and pre-framed art, and focused its efforts on
value-added picture framing glass and acrylic products. There can be no assurance that the revenue
and profitability patterns experienced by the segment will not change in the near future or that
the current trend to value-added products will continue.
The LSO segment is highly dependent on a relatively small number of customers for its sales. We
continue to expect to derive a significant portion of our net sales from a small number of
customers. Accordingly, loss of a significant customer or a significant shift to a less favorable
mix of value-added picture framing glass products for one of those customers could materially
reduce LSO revenues and operating results in any one year.
The LSO segment is highly dependent on U.S. consumer confidence and the U.S. economy. Our business
in this segment depends on the strength of the retail picture framing market. This market is highly
dependent on consumer confidence and the conditions of the U.S. economy. We have been able to
partially offset the impact of economic slowdowns in the recent past with new products and an
increase in the mix of higher value-added picture framing products. If consumer confidence further
declines, whether as a result of an economic slowdown, uncertainty regarding the future or other
factors, our use of these strategies may not be as successful in the future, resulting in a
potentially significant decrease in revenues and operating income.
The LSO segment results could be adversely impacted by capacity utilization. The LSO segments
near-term performance depends, to a significant degree, on its ability to utilize its production
capacity, especially since we have increased the capacity for our highest value-added picture
framing glass and acrylic products. The failure to successfully integrate and manage this
additional capacity could adversely impact operating results.
Other Operational Risks
The Companys results may be adversely impacted by implementation of an Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) system. During fiscal 2008 and throughout fiscal 2009, the Company began
implementing a company-wide ERP system to upgrade its information system technologies. The
continuing multi-year initiative will enhance internal processes, improve access to information and
improve the control environment. The complexities of an ERP implementation and large-scale process
changes that will be required could result in costs that exceed the project budget, business
interruptions and reduced financial performance, adversely impacting operating results.
10
Financial Risks
Volatility in the global economy could adversely affect results of operations and our financial
condition. Global financial markets have been experiencing extreme disruption over the past year,
including, among other things, volatility in securities prices, diminished liquidity and credit
availability, rating downgrades of certain investments and declining valuations of others. These
conditions have had an adverse impact on our recent results of operations. Further volatility could
lead to challenges in our business and negatively impact our financial condition or results of
operations. The tightening of credit in financial markets could adversely affect our ability, as
well as the ability of our customers and suppliers, to obtain financing. In addition, lack of
financing for commercial construction projects could further result in a decrease in orders and
spending for our products and services. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity
of the current disruption in financial markets and adverse economic conditions and the effects they
may have on our business and financial condition.
Our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results are volatile and difficult to predict. Our
revenue and operating results may fall below the expectations of securities analysts,
company-provided guidance or investors in future periods. Our annual revenue and operating results
may vary depending on a number of factors, including, but not limited to: fluctuating customer
demand, delay or timing of shipments, construction delays or cancellation due to lack of financing
for construction projects, changes in product and project mix or market acceptance of new products;
manufacturing or operational difficulties that may arise due to quality control, capacity
utilization of our production equipment or staffing requirements; competition, including new
entrants into our markets, the introduction of new products by competitors, adoption of competitive
technologies by our customers, competitive pressures on prices of our products and services; raw
material pricing and the potential for disruption of supply; and changes in legislation that could
have an adverse impact on our labor or other costs. Our failure to meet revenue and operating
result expectations would likely adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Self-Insurance and Product Liability Risk
We retain a high level of uninsured risk; a material claim could impact our financial results. We
obtain substantial amounts of commercial insurance for potential losses for general liability,
employment practices, workers compensation and automobile liability risk. However, a high amount
of risk is retained on a self-insured basis through a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary. Therefore,
a material product liability event, such as a material rework event, could have a material adverse
effect on our operating results.
Environmental Regulation Risks
We are subject to potential environmental, remediation and compliance risks that could adversely
affect our financial results. We use hazardous chemicals in producing products at three facilities
(two in our Architectural segment and one in our LSO segment). One facility in our Architectural
segment has certain historical environmental conditions which we believe require remediation. We
are subject to a variety of local, state and federal governmental regulations relating to storage,
discharge, handling, emission, generation and disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used
to manufacture our products, compliance with which is expensive. Our failure to comply with current
or future environmental regulations could result in the imposition of substantial fines on us,
suspension of production, alteration of our manufacturing processes or increased costs.
Additionally, our inability to remediate the historical environmental conditions at the
Architectural segment facility at or below the amounts estimated as part of the purchase price
allocation could have a material adverse impact on future financial results.
Discontinued Curtainwall Operations
The risks and uncertainties associated with discontinued operations could adversely impact the
Company. During fiscal 1998, we made the strategic decision to close or exit our European and
Asian international curtainwall operations in order to focus more selectively on higher-margin
domestic curtainwall business. During fiscal 1999, we decided to sell our domestic large-scale
curtainwall operation. We maintain risks associated with closing the domestic and international
operations from performance bonds established with our customers and remaining warranty coverages
that exist on completed projects.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
11
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table lists, by segment, the Companys major facilities as of February 28, 2009, the
general use of the facility and whether it is owned or leased by the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/ |
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
Location |
|
Leased |
|
Size (sq. ft.) |
|
Function |
|
Architectural Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viracon |
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
Owned |
|
|
790,460 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Viracon |
|
Statesboro, GA |
|
Owned |
|
|
397,200 |
|
|
Mfg/Warehouse |
Viracon |
|
Statesboro, GA |
|
Leased |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
Warehouse |
Viracon |
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
Owned |
|
|
136,000 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Viracon |
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
Leased |
|
|
156,000 |
|
|
Warehouse |
Viracon |
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
Leased |
|
|
132,800 |
|
|
Warehouse/Admin |
Viracon |
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
Leased |
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
Maintenance |
Viracon |
|
St. George, UT |
|
Owned |
|
|
234,400 |
|
|
Mfg/Warehouse |
Harmon, Inc. Headquarters |
|
Minneapolis, MN |
|
Leased |
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
Admin |
Wausau Window and Wall Systems |
|
Wausau, WI |
|
Owned |
|
|
133,356 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin* |
Wausau Window and Wall Systems |
|
Wausau, WI |
|
Owned |
|
|
388,986 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Wausau Window and Wall Systems |
|
Stratford, WI |
|
Owned |
|
|
67,004 |
|
|
Mfg |
Linetec |
|
Wausau, WI |
|
Owned |
|
|
468,000 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Tubelite |
|
Reed City, MI |
|
Owned |
|
|
244,632 |
|
|
Mfg |
Tubelite |
|
Walker, MI |
|
Leased |
|
|
80,514 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSO Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tru Vue |
|
McCook, IL |
|
Owned |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Tru Vue |
|
Faribault, MN |
|
Owned |
|
|
274,600 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Tru Vue |
|
Lakeland, FL |
|
Leased |
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
Mfg/Admin |
Tru Vue |
|
Tempe, AZ |
|
Leased |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
Admin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apogee Corporate Office |
|
Minneapolis, MN |
|
Leased |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
Admin |
|
|
|
* |
|
This facility is currently for sale. |
In addition to the locations indicated above, the Architectural segments Harmon, Inc. operates 11
leased locations, serving multiple markets.
One of the Viracon facilities, a portion of the Wausau Window and Wall Systems facility, a portion
of the Linetec facility and the Tru Vue facilities were constructed with the use of proceeds from
industrial revenue bonds issued by their applicable cities. These properties are considered owned
since, at the end of the bond term, title reverts to the Company.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company has been a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its normal operating
activities. In particular, like others in the construction supply industry, the Companys
construction supply businesses are routinely involved in various disputes and claims arising out of
construction projects, sometimes involving significant monetary damages or product replacement. The
Company has also been subject to litigation arising out of employment practices, workers
compensation, general liability and automobile claims. Additionally, as noted in Note 14 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Companys international curtainwall discontinued
operations continue to be party to various legal proceedings. Although it is difficult to
accurately predict the outcome of such proceedings, facts currently available indicate that no such
claims will result in losses that would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter ended February
28, 2009.
12
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Positions with Apogee Enterprises and Five-Year Employment History |
|
Russell Huffer
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since June 1999
and Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since
January 1998. Various management positions within the Company
since 1986. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James S. Porter
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer since October 2005. Vice President of
Strategy and Planning from 2002 through 2005. Various management
positions within the Company since 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia A. Beithon
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
General Counsel and Secretary since September 1999. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Johnson
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President-Treasurer since January 2001. Various management
positions within the Company since 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory A. Silvestri
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Executive Vice President since March 2008 and Viracon President
since December 2008. Senior Vice President of Operations, Viracon
from August 2007 to March 2008. Various management positions with
Plug Power, Inc., a fuel cell company, from 1999 to 2007, serving
as President from 2006 to 2007. |
Executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve for a one-year period.
There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers or directors of the
Company.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Apogee common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (Nasdaq) under the ticker symbol
APOG. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, the average trading volume of Apogee common
stock was 8,400,000 shares per month, according to Nasdaq.
As of April 1, 2009, there were approximately 1,739 shareholders of record and 9,500 shareholders
for whom securities firms acted as nominees.
The following chart shows the quarterly range and year-end closing bids for one share of the
Companys common stock over the past five fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Year-end |
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Close |
2009 |
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24.22 |
|
|
$ |
15.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25.99 |
|
|
$ |
5.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.46 |
|
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.77 |
|
|
$ |
9.47 |
|
2008 |
|
|
18.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.75 |
|
|
|
24.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.30 |
|
|
|
20.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.96 |
|
|
|
14.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.25 |
|
|
|
15.39 |
|
2007 |
|
|
14.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.04 |
|
|
|
12.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.85 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.20 |
|
|
|
15.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.34 |
|
|
|
19.39 |
|
2006 |
|
|
12.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.23 |
|
|
|
13.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.59 |
|
|
|
14.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.43 |
|
|
|
15.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.64 |
|
|
|
17.30 |
|
2005 |
|
|
9.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.35 |
|
|
|
9.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.86 |
|
|
|
11.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.69 |
|
|
|
12.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.92 |
|
|
|
14.20 |
|
13
Dividends
It is Apogees practice, subject to Board review and approval, to declare and pay quarterly cash
dividends. Cash dividends have been paid each quarter since 1974. The chart below shows quarterly,
and annual cumulative, cash dividends per share for the past five fiscal years. Subject to future
operating results, available funds and the Companys future financial condition, the Company
intends to continue paying cash dividends, when and if declared by its Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Total |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
0.074 |
|
|
$ |
0.074 |
|
|
$ |
0.082 |
|
|
$ |
0.082 |
|
|
$ |
0.311 |
|
2008 |
|
|
0.068 |
|
|
|
0.068 |
|
|
|
0.074 |
|
|
|
0.074 |
|
|
|
0.283 |
|
2007 |
|
|
0.065 |
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
|
|
0.068 |
|
|
|
0.068 |
|
|
|
0.265 |
|
2006 |
|
|
0.063 |
|
|
|
0.063 |
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
|
|
0.065 |
|
|
|
0.255 |
|
2005 |
|
|
0.060 |
|
|
|
0.060 |
|
|
|
0.063 |
|
|
|
0.063 |
|
|
|
0.245 |
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company
The following table provides information with respect to purchases made by the Company of its own
stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares that may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
yet be |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plans |
|
under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased (a) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
or Programs (b) |
|
or Programs (b) |
Nov. 30, 2008 through Dec. 27, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245,877 |
|
Dec 28, 2008 through Jan. 24, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245,877 |
|
Jan. 25, 2009 through Feb. 28, 2009 |
|
|
79,021 |
|
|
|
9.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245,877 |
|
Total |
|
|
79,021 |
|
|
$ |
9.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245,877 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The shares in this column represent shares that were surrendered to us by plan participants
in order to satisfy stock-for-stock option exercises or withholding tax obligations related to
stock-based compensation. |
|
(b) |
|
In April 2003, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 1,500,000 shares of
Company stock, which was announced on April 10, 2003. In January 2008, the Board of Directors
increased the authorization by 750,000 shares, which was announced on January 24, 2008. In
October 2008, the Board of Directors increased the authorization by 1,000,000 shares, which was
announced on October 8, 2008. The Companys repurchase program does not have an expiration date. |
14
Comparative Stock Performance
The line graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the
last five fiscal years with cumulative total return on the Standard & Poors Small Cap 600 Index
and the Russell 2000 Index. This graph assumes a $100 investment in each of Apogee, the Standard &
Poors Small Cap 600 Index and the Russell 2000 Index at the close of trading on February 28, 2004,
and also assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
Fiscal 2007 |
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
Apogee |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
116.05 |
|
|
$ |
143.77 |
|
|
$ |
186.75 |
|
|
$ |
131.67 |
|
|
$ |
83.07 |
|
S&P S&P Small Cap 600 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
115.07 |
|
|
|
131.90 |
|
|
|
145.79 |
|
|
|
126.24 |
|
|
|
71.50 |
|
Russell 2000 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
108.88 |
|
|
|
125.79 |
|
|
|
140.67 |
|
|
|
117.18 |
|
|
|
66.44 |
|
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009, our primary business activities included architectural
glass products and services (approximately 92 percent of net sales) and large-scale optical
technologies (approximately eight percent of net sales). We are not aware of any competitors,
public or private, that are similar to us in size and scope of business activities. Most of our
direct competitors are either privately owned or divisions of larger, publicly owned companies.
15
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following information should be read in conjunction with Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data. The financial results for fiscal 2004 through 2006 have been restated to
reflect the business unit that comprised our Auto Glass segment as a discontinued operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 (a) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Results from Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
925,502 |
|
|
$ |
881,809 |
|
|
$ |
778,847 |
|
|
$ |
665,457 |
|
|
$ |
595,240 |
|
|
$ |
490,750 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
200,748 |
|
|
|
185,150 |
|
|
|
148,414 |
|
|
|
128,422 |
|
|
|
111,411 |
|
|
|
82,994 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
77,655 |
|
|
|
66,459 |
|
|
|
47,725 |
|
|
|
30,894 |
|
|
|
24,020 |
|
|
|
(1,111 |
) |
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
51,195 |
|
|
|
43,170 |
|
|
|
31,652 |
|
|
|
24,237 |
|
|
|
15,214 |
|
|
|
(949 |
) |
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
51,035 |
|
|
|
48,551 |
|
|
|
31,653 |
|
|
|
23,768 |
|
|
|
16,645 |
|
|
|
(5,593 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
1.85 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
228,688 |
|
|
$ |
259,229 |
|
|
$ |
222,484 |
|
|
$ |
203,134 |
|
|
$ |
187,106 |
|
|
$ |
157,854 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
527,684 |
|
|
|
563,508 |
|
|
|
449,161 |
|
|
|
403,958 |
|
|
|
368,465 |
|
|
|
336,517 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
157,292 |
|
|
|
177,315 |
|
|
|
145,859 |
|
|
|
127,809 |
|
|
|
119,492 |
|
|
|
90,638 |
|
Longterm debt |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
58,200 |
|
|
|
35,400 |
|
|
|
45,200 |
|
|
|
35,150 |
|
|
|
39,650 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
316,624 |
|
|
|
284,582 |
|
|
|
235,668 |
|
|
|
199,053 |
|
|
|
178,080 |
|
|
|
167,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
29,307 |
|
|
$ |
22,776 |
|
|
$ |
18,536 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
16,703 |
|
|
$ |
18,423 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
55,184 |
|
|
|
55,208 |
|
|
|
39,893 |
|
|
|
29,361 |
|
|
|
19,531 |
|
|
|
10,933 |
|
Dividends* |
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
8,192 |
|
|
|
9,312 |
|
|
|
6,989 |
|
|
|
6,695 |
|
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin % of sales |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Operating margin % of sales |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Effective tax rate % |
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
NM | |
Noncash working capital |
|
$ |
44,336 |
|
|
$ |
69,650 |
|
|
$ |
70,438 |
|
|
$ |
70,650 |
|
|
$ |
61,647 |
|
|
$ |
59,393 |
|
Longterm debt as a % of total capital |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
Return on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shareholders equity % |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Average invested capital** % |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Dividend yield at yearend % |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Book value per share |
|
|
11.40 |
|
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
Price/earnings ratio at yearend |
|
|
5:1 |
|
|
|
9:1 |
|
|
|
17:1 |
|
|
|
20:1 |
|
|
|
24:1 |
|
|
NM | |
Average monthly trading volume |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
7,740 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See Item 5 for dividend per share data. |
|
** |
|
[(Operating income + equity in earnings of affiliated companies) x (.65)]/average invested
capital |
|
|
|
NM=Not meaningful |
|
(a) |
|
See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to
the acquisition of Tubelite in December 2007. |
16
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future
events and financial performance. The words believe, expect, anticipate, intend,
estimate, forecast, project, should and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. All forecasts and projections in this document are forward-looking statements, and are
based on managements current expectations or beliefs of the Companys near-term results, based on
current information available pertaining to the Company, including the risk factors noted under
Item 1A in this Form 10-K. From time to time, we also may provide oral and written forward-looking
statements in other materials we release to the public such as press releases, presentations to
securities analysts or investors, or other communications by the Company. Any or all of our
forward-looking statements in this report and in any public statements we make could be materially
different from actual results.
Accordingly, we wish to caution investors that any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf
of the Company are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from such statements. These uncertainties and other risk factors include, but are
not limited to, the risks and uncertainties set forth under Item 1A in this Form 10-K.
We wish to caution investors that other factors might in the future prove to be important in
affecting the Companys results of operations. New factors emerge from time to time; it is not
possible for management to predict all such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such
factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or a combination of factors, may cause
actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We
undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are a leader in certain technologies involving the design and development of value-added glass
products, services and systems. The Company is comprised of two segments: Architectural Products
and Services (Architectural) and Large-Scale Optical (LSO). Our Architectural segment companies
design, engineer, fabricate, install, maintain and renovate the walls of glass, windows, storefront
and entrances comprising the outside skin of commercial and institutional buildings. Businesses in
this segment are: Viracon, Inc., a fabricator of coated, high-performance architectural glass for
global markets; Harmon, Inc., one of the largest U.S. full-service building glass installation,
maintenance and renovation companies; Wausau Window and Wall Systems, a manufacturer of custom
aluminum window systems and curtainwall; Linetec, a paint and anodizing finisher of architectural
aluminum and PVC shutters; and Tubelite, Inc. (Tubelite), a fabricator of aluminum storefront,
entrance and curtainwall products for the U.S. commercial construction industry. Our LSO segment
consists of Tru Vue, Inc., a manufacturer of value-added glass and acrylic for the custom picture
framing and commercial optics markets.
The following are the key items that impacted fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
The Architectural segments operating results benefited from solid execution by the
installation and window businesses of projects with good margins and mix, and from good
pricing in our architectural glass business. These items, along with increased sales
resulting from the acquisition of the storefront and entrance business in December 2007,
enabled us to improve segment operating earnings by 21 percent. |
|
|
|
|
Despite a decrease in revenues, operating income in the LSO segment improved 10 percent
due to improved productivity and a strong mix of our best value-added picture framing glass
and acrylic products. |
|
|
|
|
We completed key strategic capital investments that position us for efficient growth when
markets improve, and allow us to reduce capital spending to less than $20 million in fiscal
2010, a level that adequately funds safety and maintenance requirements, as well as
expansion of our green product offerings. |
|
|
|
|
Our backlog decreased 38 percent to $317.4 million at February 28, 2009 compared to
$512.6 million at March 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
The Architectural segment backlog, which represents more than 99 percent of the
backlog, decreased 38 percent from the prior year as a result of cancellations and
slowing bid-to-award timing, despite strong bidding activity. |
|
|
|
During the third quarter and in connection with PPGs sale of its automotive replacement
glass businesses, we exercised our right to sell our minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass
joint venture, resulting in cash proceeds of $27.1 million and a pretax gain on sale of
approximately $2.0 million. These proceeds were used to pay down outstanding borrowings on
our revolving credit facility. |
|
|
|
|
We generated strong cash flow from operations, while paying off all of our bank debt. As
of February 28, 2009 the only long-term debt remaining was $8.4 million in low-interest
industrial revenue bonds, which we intend to retain. |
17
Strategy. The following describes our business strategy for each of our segments.
Architectural segment. Our Architectural segment serves the commercial construction market which is
highly cyclical. We have five companies within this segment that participate at various stages of
the glass fabrication, window and wall supply chain each with nationally recognized brands and
leading positions in their target market segments. These window and wall systems enclose commercial
buildings such as offices, hospitals, educational facilities, government facilities, high-end
condominiums and retail centers. We believe building contractors value our ability to deliver
quality, customized window and curtainwall solutions to projects on time and on budget, helping to
minimize costly job-site labor overruns. Their customers building owners and developers value
the distinctive look, energy efficient and hurricane and blast protection features of our glass
systems. These benefits can contribute to higher lease rates, lower operating costs due to the
energy efficiency of our value-added glass, a more comfortable environment for building occupants,
and protection for buildings and occupants from hurricanes and blasts.
We look at several market indicators such as office space vacancy rates, architectural billing
statistics and other economic indicators to gain insight into the commercial construction market.
One of our primary indicators is the U.S. non-residential construction market activity as
documented by McGraw-Hill Construction/F.W. Dodge (McGraw-Hill), a leading independent provider of
construction industry analysis, forecasts and trends. We adjust this information (which is based on
construction starts) to align with our fiscal year and the lag that is required to account for when
our products and services typically are initiated in a construction project approximately nine
months after project start. From the spring calendar 2009 McGraw-Hill report, the U.S.
non-residential construction market had an annual compounded growth rate of 13 percent over our
past three fiscal years. Our segments compounded annual growth rate over that same period was 14
percent.
Our overall strategy in this segment is to defend and grow over a cycle by extending our presence
while remaining focused on distinctive solutions for enclosing commercial buildings by leveraging
our leading brands, energy-efficient products and high quality and service. Each of our existing
businesses has the ability to grow through geographic or product line expansion, and there are also
adjacent market segments we regularly penetrate. In addition, we aspire to lead our markets in the
development of practical energy-efficient products for green buildings and the ability to deliver
them in a sustainable manner.
Over the last several years we have added capacity to serve the U.S. market for architectural
window and wall systems. These investments included construction of a third location and expansion
of two existing locations for our architectural glass fabrication business. We also constructed a
new window and wall manufacturing facility to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
Silver standards to replace antiquated facilities. In addition, we acquired Tubelite, a storefront
and entrance fabricator, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, entering a significant segment of
the commercial building enclosure market in which we had not previously had a presence. Our
architectural businesses have introduced products and services designed to meet the growing demand
for green building materials. These products have included new energy efficient glass coatings,
thermally-enhanced aluminum framing systems, and systems with high amounts of recycled content.
While the U.S. commercial construction market will continue to contract, we continue to pursue the
same basic strategy with some adjustment for market conditions. We have been and continue to take
measures to keep our cost structure in line with revenue including continuing to focus on
productivity. We are more aggressively pursuing international markets and the broader domestic
markets for our architectural glass products. We are bidding installation work in new metropolitan
markets to offset declines in core markets. We are focusing on renovation and new projects in the
institutional sector, which should be more stable than private sector construction. We are
tightening our capital spending criteria, although we continue to have cash available for strategic
investments. We expect to emerge from the current recession poised to win market share from
competitors who were not as well positioned to weather the current down cycle.
LSO segment. Our basic strategy in this segment is to convert the custom picture framing market
from clear uncoated glass to value-added glass that protects art from UV damage while minimizing
reflection from the glass so that viewers see the art rather than the glass. We estimate that
approximately 30 percent of the retail picture framing market has converted to value-added glass
while the ultimate potential is significantly higher. We offer a variety of products with varying
levels of reflection control and promote the benefits to consumers with point-of-purchase displays
and other promotional materials. We also work to educate the fragmented custom picture framing
market on the opportunity to improve the profitability of their framing business by offering
value-added glass.
In fiscal 2009, we extended this strategy to the fine art market, which includes museums and
private collections. We also made capital investments to support the conversion to value-added
picture framing products as well as to grow the fine art market. As part of that extension, we
developed value-added acrylic products in addition to glass. Acrylic is a preferred material in the
fine art markets because the art can be much larger and weight is an important consideration.
18
Results of Operations
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
2008 vs. 2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
925,502 |
|
|
$ |
881,809 |
|
|
$ |
778,847 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
The 5.0 percent increase in sales was primarily due to the full-year impact of the acquisition of
the storefront and entrance business late in fiscal 2008 and from volume increases resulting from
the fiscal 2008 capacity expansions in our architectural glass business. This business also
benefited from price increases as a result of the improved commercial construction market
experienced through most of the year. These were offset by the impacts of cancellations and delays
that occurred late in the third quarter and through the fourth quarter, mostly impacting volume in
our architectural glass and window and wall business, and lower LSO segment sales from reduced
picture framing demand.
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
The 13.2 percent increase in sales was primarily due to an improved commercial construction market,
enabling us to increase volume across all our Architectural segment businesses, but primarily in
the architectural glass fabrication business. We were able to increase volume in glass fabrication
as a result of increased capacity, including the start-up of the St. George, Utah facility. Sales
were also impacted by improved pricing/mix in the architectural glass fabrication and window
businesses, and improved job cost flow in our architectural glass installation business. It should
be noted that fiscal 2008 contained only 52 weeks compared to 53 weeks in fiscal 2007, which
negatively impacted fiscal 2008 net sales by 2 percent.
Performance
The relationship between various components of operations, as a percentage of net sales, is
illustrated below for the past three fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentage of net sales) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
78.3 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from equity method investee |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate for continuing operations |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008
Consolidated gross profit improved by 0.7 percentage points primarily as a result of better
execution by the installation and window businesses on projects with good margins, a good overall
mix of projects and good pricing at our architectural glass business, slightly offset by
operational challenges in the second and third quarters at our architectural glass business.
Additionally, our picture framing business saw a strong mix of our best value-added glass and
acrylic products and improved productivity.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased as a percent of sales to 13.3 percent
in fiscal 2009 from 13.5 percent in fiscal 2008, while spending increased by $4.4 million. The
decrease as a percent of sales primarily relates to reduced long-term executive compensation
expenses, related to lower projected payouts of stock-based incentives as a result of reducing our
financial outlook for future years. The remaining decrease as a percent of sales is due to
leveraging expenses over a higher level of sales dollars. The increase in spending was due to
expenditures to update our computer systems and information technology infrastructure, as well as
the impact of amortization of intangibles related to the storefront and entrance business
acquisition.
19
Interest expense decreased $0.7 million from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009. This decrease includes a
$0.4 million decline due to lower weighted average interest rates on our revolving credit facility
and a $0.3 million increase in the amount of interest capitalized for capital expenditure projects.
Equity in affiliated companies reflected our 34 percent interest in an automotive replacement glass
distribution business, PPG Auto Glass, LLC (PPG AG). During fiscal 2009 and in connection with
PPGs sale of its automotive replacement glass businesses, we exercised our right to sell our
minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture, resulting in cash proceeds of $27.1 million
and a pretax gain on sale of approximately $2.0 million. Excluding the gain on sale, equity in
affiliated companies reported a loss of $0.1 million for fiscal 2009 compared to $2.2 million of
income in the prior-year period. This was due primarily to soft conditions in the auto glass
replacement market during fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2008, we recorded a $4.7 million impairment
charge related to the PPG Auto Glass joint venture, as well as a $0.3 million write-off of another
equity-method investment. Both charges are reflected in our consolidated results of operations as
an impairment charge on investment in affiliated company.
The effective income tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 35.0 percent compared to 30.7 percent in fiscal
2008. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to a benefit recognized in the prior
year upon conclusion of the analysis of research and development tax credits. The prior year
included both fiscal 2008 and additional prior years research and development tax credits, which
lowered the rate. The current year was also impacted, to a lesser extent, by research and
development tax credits taken, for fiscal 2009 only.
In fiscal 2009, there was an immaterial net loss from discontinued operations of $0.2 million
compared to income of $5.4 million in fiscal 2008. Prior-year results included the gain on sale of
certain assets related to our Auto Glass business of $3.7 million, a reduction in reserves of $2.2
million related to resolution of an outstanding legal matter in our discontinued European
curtainwall operations, and net loss from operations of our Auto Glass business of $0.5 million.
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Consolidated gross profit improved by 1.9 percentage points primarily as a result of pricing and
better mix of projects within our architectural glass, window and installation businesses. The
gross margin also benefited from higher capacity utilization in the Architectural segment
businesses, as well as improved mix in the LSO segment. Gross profit as a percentage of sales
includes the impact of approximately 0.7 negative percentage points for the year as a result of
third-quarter write downs of $6.5 million on three architectural glass installation projects in the
Florida market. As we neared completion of the projects in the third quarter, we identified
significant workmanship and quality issues that would require significant costs to remediate and
would likely result in the payment of additional contractual remedies to our customers. These
write-downs reflected our conclusions that, as a result of these developments, the ultimate costs
of the projects would exceed contract revenues. During the fourth quarter, we recorded $2.3 million
of additional costs for remediation activities to complete these projects and additional
backcharges not previously identified. Two of these jobs were essentially completed by the end of
fiscal 2008, while we anticipated the last project would be completed during the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The fourth-quarter cost increases were offset by write-ups on other jobs within the
installation business that occur in the normal course of business.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased as a percent of sales from 13.0
percent in fiscal 2007 to 13.5 percent in fiscal 2008, an increase of $18 million. This increase
relates primarily to expenditures to update our computer systems and information technology
infrastructure, higher salaries and wages to support our growth, and increased incentive
compensation expense due to improved financial performance.
Interest expense decreased $0.2 million from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008. This decrease includes a
$0.9 million decline due to lower average daily borrowing and lower weighted average interest rates
on our revolving credit facility, partially offset by a decrease in interest capitalized for
capital expenditure projects.
Equity in affiliated companies reflects our 34 percent interest in an automotive replacement glass
distribution business, PPG Auto Glass, LLC (PPG AG). During fiscal 2008, we recorded an impairment
charge of $4.7 million on the goodwill associated with this investment. In addition, our equity in
the earnings of PPG AG decreased from $2.8 million in fiscal 2007 to $2.2 million in fiscal 2008 as
this business faces difficult market conditions.
The effective income tax rate for fiscal 2008 was 30.7 percent compared to 35.1 percent in fiscal
2007. The primary reason for this decrease in rate was due to the completion of an analysis of
activities that are eligible for current and prior-year research and development tax credits. Both
fiscal 2008 and additional prior-years research and development tax credits were reflected in the
fiscal 2008 rate.
20
Earnings from discontinued operations of $5.4 million net of tax in fiscal 2008 resulted from the
gain on sale of certain assets related to our Auto Glass business of $3.7 million; the reduction in
reserves of $2.2 million related to resolution of an outstanding legal matter in our discontinued
European curtainwall operations; and net loss from operations of our Auto Glass business of $0.5
million. In fiscal 2007, we had immaterial net earnings from discontinued operations.
Segment Analysis
Architectural Products and Services (Architectural)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
854,034 |
|
|
$ |
798,819 |
|
|
$ |
694,888 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
64,693 |
|
|
|
53,549 |
|
|
|
40,323 |
|
Operating income as a percent of sales |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008. Fiscal 2009 net sales increased $55.2 million or 6.9 percent
over fiscal 2008, primarily due to the full-year impact of the acquisition of Tubelite late in
fiscal 2008. The full-year impact of the acquisition accounted for 5.3 percentage points of the 6.9
percent change. Additionally, volume increases from the fiscal 2008 capacity expansions, and price
increases as a result of the improved commercial construction market experienced through most of
the year in our architectural glass business increased revenues. These were offset by the impacts
of cancellations and delays that occurred late in the third quarter and through the fourth quarter,
mostly impacting volume in our architectural glass and window and wall businesses.
The Architectural segments operating income of $64.7 million, or 7.6 percent of sales, increased
$11.2 million or 20.8 percent over fiscal 2008 operating income of $53.5 million. The primary
driver of the year-over-year growth was solid execution of projects with good margins and a good
overall mix of projects within our installation business. The architectural glass business saw good
pricing during the year, which was offset by mid-year operational challenges in this business.
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007. The $103.9 million or 15 percent increase in Architectural net
sales from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 reflected increased volume across all businesses, primarily
due to an improved commercial construction market. The improved market enabled us to utilize
increased capacity in the architectural glass fabrication business, leading to a significant
portion of the increase in volume. The increase in net sales was also due to improved pricing,
project mix and productivity in our architectural glass fabrication and window businesses, and
improved job cost flow in our architectural glass installation business. Revenue from Tubelite
subsequent to our December 2007 acquisition totaled $10.5 million, or 1.5 percentage points, of the
overall fiscal-year increase.
The Architectural segments operating income of $53.5 million, or 6.7 percent of sales, increased
$13.2 million or 32.8 percent over fiscal 2007 operating income of $40.3 million. All businesses in
the segment had improved operating income except our architectural glass installation business,
where we experienced write-downs during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2008 on three
projects within the Florida market. Operating income improvements for the Architectural segment
reflected the impact of higher revenues as discussed above, improved pricing and a more favorable
mix of projects with higher value-added features.
Large-Scale Optical Technologies (LSO)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
71,476 |
|
|
$ |
82,993 |
|
|
$ |
84,082 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
16,897 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
|
10,215 |
|
Operating income as a percent of sales |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008. LSO revenues were down $11.5 million in fiscal 2009 to $71.5
million from $83.0 million in fiscal 2008. Revenues for this business were impacted by a declining
custom picture framing industry that reduced square foot volume by 18 percent. The prior year also
included $3.4 million in sales from the pre-framed art product line that was sold during the third
quarter of fiscal 2008. These negative factors were partially offset by the incremental revenues
earned from the shift in mix to our best value-added products. LSO segment operating income as a
percent of sales improved to 23.6 percent in fiscal 2009 from 18.6 percent in fiscal 2008 as our
picture framing business experienced improved productivity and a stronger mix of our best
value-added picture framing glass and acrylic products in the current year, and as we exited our
unprofitable pre-framed art product line.
Fiscal 2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007. LSO revenues in fiscal 2008 decreased $1.1 million from fiscal
2007. This net decrease reflected a modest increase in revenues from our picture framing business
resulting from favorable product mix of our value-added products, partially offset by a $4.0
million decrease in sales from the pre-framed art product line that was
21
sold during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. LSO segment operating income as a percent of sales
improved from 12.1 percent in fiscal 2007 to 18.6 percent in fiscal 2008 as our picture framing
business sold a higher percentage of our best, value-added picture framing glass in fiscal 2008.
Consolidated Backlog
At February 28, 2009, our consolidated backlog was $317.4 million, down 38 percent from the $512.6
million reported at March 1, 2008. Project cancellations and slow bid-to-award timing are impacting
backlog levels, despite steady bidding activity. The backlog of the Architectural segment
represented more than 99 percent of consolidated backlog. We expect 75 percent of our total
backlog to be recognized in fiscal 2010 revenue. We view backlog as an important statistic in
evaluating the level of sales activity and short-term sales trends in our business. However, as
backlog is only one indicator, and is not an effective indicator, of the ultimate profitability of
our sales, we do not believe that backlog should be used as the sole indicator of future earnings
of the Company.
Acquisitions
On December 21, 2007, we acquired all of the shares of Tubelite, Inc., a privately held business,
for $45.7 million, including transaction costs of $1.0 million and net of cash acquired of $0.9
million. Tubelites results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial
statements and within the Architectural segment since the date of acquisition. Tubelite fabricates
aluminum storefront, entrance and curtainwall products for the U.S. commercial construction
industry. The purchase is part of our strategy to grow our presence in commercial architectural
markets. Goodwill recorded as part of the purchase price allocation was $21.7 million and is not
tax deductible. Identifiable intangible assets acquired as part of the acquisition were $17.6
million and include customer relationships, trademarks and non-compete agreements with a weighted
average useful life of 15 years.
Discontinued Operations
During fiscal 2007, we announced our intention to discontinue the manufacturing of automotive
replacement glass products and also announced the decision to sell the remaining portion of the
Auto Glass segment that manufactures and sells original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket
replacement windshields for the recreational vehicle and bus markets. We restated our consolidated
financial statements to show the results of the Auto Glass segment in discontinued operations. We
completed the sale of certain assets related to the business during the third quarter of fiscal
2008. Conclusion of the sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $5.8 million which is included in
earnings from discontinued operations in the consolidated results of operations.
In several transactions in fiscal years 1998 through 2000, we completed the sale of our large-scale
domestic curtainwall business, the sale of our detention/security business and the exit from
international curtainwall operations. The remaining estimated cash expenditures related to these
discontinued operations are recorded as liabilities of discontinued operations and a majority of
the remaining cash expenditures related to discontinued operations are expected to be paid within
the next three years. The majority of these liabilities relate to the international curtainwall
operations, including bonds outstanding, of which the precise degree of liability related to these
matters, will not be known until they are settled within the U.K. courts. The reserve for
discontinued operations also covers other liability issues, consisting of warranty and other costs
relating to these and other international construction projects.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, these reserves were reduced by $3.5 million, primarily due
to resolution of an outstanding legal matter related to a significant French curtainwall project,
resulting in non-cash income from discontinued operations of $2.2 million.
Related Party Transactions
In connection with PPGs sale of its automotive replacement glass businesses, we exercised our
right to sell our minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture. As a result, PPG and PPG
Auto Glass are no longer deemed to be related parties.
22
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cash effect, in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
$ |
116,298 |
|
|
$ |
86,235 |
|
|
$ |
48,071 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(55,184 |
) |
|
|
(55,208 |
) |
|
|
(39,893 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investment in affiliated company |
|
|
27,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(45,691 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
Proceeds from dispositions of property |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
(Repayment) borrowing activities, net |
|
|
(49,800 |
) |
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
(9,800 |
) |
Purchases and retirement of Company common stock |
|
|
(14,646 |
) |
|
|
(5,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(8,800 |
) |
|
|
(8,192 |
) |
|
|
(9,312 |
) |
|
Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities increased by $30.1 million for fiscal
2009 and $38.2 million for fiscal 2008, both of which were driven by higher net earnings and cash
generated by continued improvements in our working capital management processes.
We continue to focus on lowering our working capital requirements. Non-cash working capital
(current assets, excluding cash and short-term investments, less current liabilities) was $44.3
million at February 28, 2009 or 4.8 percent of fiscal 2009 sales, our key metric. This compares to
$69.7 million at March 1, 2008 or 7.9 percent of fiscal 2008 sales. The largest contributors to the
improvement in this metric were a $40.8 million decrease in accounts receivable and an increase of
$15.3 million in billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts due to continued
improvements in the receivable collection and contracting processes that drove the number of days
sales outstanding to 44 days from 54 days at fiscal 2008.
Investing activities. Investing activities used net cash of $40.2 million, $103.6 million and $34.8
million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Capital expenditures in both fiscal 2009 and
2008 were $55.2 million and were $39.9 million in fiscal 2007. The current year spending was
primarily for productivity improvements and capacity expansions in both operating segments,
including approximately $19.0 million for a new architectural window facility built to LEED Silver
standards and equipment. In fiscal 2009, we received $27.1 million of proceeds on the sale of our
interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture.
Fiscal 2008 capital expenditures included spending for building expansion and equipment for our
picture framing business, to expand capacity of our highest value-added picture framing products,
and for expansion of our architectural glass fabrication facilities, including finalization of the
St. George, Utah facility and conversion of our auto glass manufacturing facility to support
architectural glass. During fiscal 2008, the Company exercised buy-out options on two equipment
sale and leaseback agreements for $8.6 million and included these in capital expenditures. Fiscal
2008 investing activities included the acquisition of Tubelite on December 21, 2007. We acquired
all of the shares of Tubelite, a privately held business, for $45.7 million, including transaction
costs of $1.0 million and net of cash acquired of $0.9 million.
Fiscal 2007 expenditures included the majority of the spending for our new architectural glass
fabrication facility in St. George, Utah.
We anticipate that our fiscal 2010 capital expenditures will be less than $20 million, largely for
maintenance and safety expenditures, as well as expansion of our green product offerings.
We continue to review our portfolio of businesses and their assets in comparison to our internal
strategic and performance objectives. As part of this review, we may acquire other businesses,
further invest in, fully divest and/or sell parts of our current businesses.
At February 28, 2009, the Company has one sale and leaseback agreement for a building that provides
an option to purchase the building at projected future fair market value upon expiration of the
lease in 2014. The lease is classified as an operating lease in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13, Accounting for Leases. The Company has a deferred
gain of $0.6 million under this sale and leaseback transaction, which is included as accrued
expenses and other long-term liabilities. The average annual lease payment over the life of the
remaining lease is $0.4 million.
Financing activities. Net payments on our revolving credit facility were $49.8 million for fiscal
2009, net borrowings were $22.8 million in fiscal 2008 and net payments in fiscal 2007 were $9.8
million. Total outstanding borrowings at February 28, 2009 decreased to $8.4 million, consisting
solely of industrial development bonds, from $58.2 million at the end of fiscal 2008. The fiscal
2008 amount consisted of $49.8 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility and $8.4
million of
industrial development bonds. The higher debt level at the end of fiscal 2008 was primarily due to
borrowing to finance the
23
purchase of Tubelite, which we were able to pay off during fiscal 2009
with cash flow from operations. Our debt-to-total capital ratio was 2.6 percent at the end of
fiscal 2009, down from 17.0 percent at the end of fiscal 2008.
During fiscal 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of 1,500,000
shares of common stock. The Board of Directors increased this authorization by 750,000 shares in
January 2008 and by 1,000,000 in October 2008. We repurchased 535,324 shares in the open market
under this program, for a total of $7.2 million, through February 25, 2006. No share repurchases
were made under this plan during fiscal 2007. We repurchased 338,569 shares in the open market
during fiscal 2008 for $5.4 million. During fiscal 2009, we repurchased 1,130,230 shares in the
open market for $14.6 million under the program. Therefore, we have purchased a total of 2,004,123
shares, at a total cost of $27.3 million, since the inception of this program and have remaining
authority to repurchase 1,245,877 shares under this program, which has no expiration date.
In addition to the shares repurchased under the repurchase plan, we also purchased $5.0 million and
$3.1 million of Company stock from employees pursuant to terms of Board and shareholder approved
compensation plans during fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We paid $8.8 million in dividends during the current year, compared to $8.2 million in the
prior-year. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the dividend rate from $0.283 per share
in fiscal 2008 to $0.311 per share in fiscal 2009.
Other financing activities. The following summarizes significant contractual obligations that
impact our liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Cash Payments Due by Period |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Industrial revenue bonds |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
Operating leases (undiscounted) |
|
|
6,946 |
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
25,390 |
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,342 |
|
Other obligations |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
Total cash obligations |
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,808 |
|
|
$ |
4,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
11,769 |
|
|
$ |
40,891 |
|
|
We maintain a $100.0 million revolving credit facility which expires in November 2011. No
borrowings were outstanding as of February 28, 2009. The credit facility requires that we maintain
a minimum level of net worth as defined in the credit facility based on certain quarterly financial
calculations. The minimum required net worth computed in accordance with the credit agreement at
February 28, 2009 was $247.7 million, whereas our net worth as defined in the credit facility was
$316.6 million. The credit facility also requires that we maintain a debt-to-cash flow ratio of no
more than 2.75. This ratio is computed daily, with cash flow computed on a rolling 12-month basis.
Our ratio was 0.08 at February 28, 2009. If we are not in compliance with either of these
covenants, the lender may terminate the commitment and/or declare any loan then outstanding to be
immediately due and payable. At February 28, 2009, we were in compliance with all of the financial
covenants of the credit facility. Long-term debt also includes $8.4 million of industrial
development bonds that mature in fiscal years 2021 through 2023.
From time to time, we acquire the use of certain assets, such as warehouses, automobiles,
forklifts, vehicles, office equipment, hardware, software and some manufacturing equipment through
operating leases. Many of these operating leases have termination penalties. However, because the
assets are used in the conduct of our business operations, it is unlikely that any significant
portion of these operating leases would be terminated prior to the normal expiration of their lease
terms. Therefore, we consider the risk related to termination penalties to be minimal.
Under certain of our lease agreements, we have the option to purchase equipment at projected future
fair value upon expiration of the leases. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we notified our
lender of our intent to exercise the early buy-out option on one of our equipment leases. The early
buy-out was effective in the third quarter in the amount of $0.3 million.
As of February 28, 2009, we have purchase obligations totaling $6.3 million, the majority of which
are for raw material commitments.
The other obligations in the table above relate to non-compete and consulting agreements with
current and former employees.
We expect to make contributions of $0.5 million to our defined-benefit pension plans in fiscal
2010. The fiscal 2010 expected contributions will equal or exceed our minimum funding requirements.
As of February 28, 2009, we had $15.6 million and $2.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and
environmental liabilities, respectively. We are unable to reasonably estimate in which future
periods these amounts will ultimately be settled.
24
We had entered into two interest rate swap agreements in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 that
converted $20.0 million of variable rate borrowings into fixed-rate obligations. Both interest rate
swaps were terminated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, resulting in a $0.3 million pre-tax
charge to interest expense. At March 1, 2008, we had an interest rate swap agreement that converted
$3.5 million of variable rate borrowings into a fixed rate obligation, this agreement expired
during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
The variable to fixed interest rate swaps were designated as and were effective as cash-flow
hedges, and were included in the balance sheet with other long-term liabilities, with changes in
fair values included in other comprehensive income. Derivative gains and losses included in other
comprehensive income were reclassified into earnings at the time the related interest expense was
recognized, upon settlement or termination of the related commitment. Gains or losses on
ineffectiveness were not material.
At February 28, 2009, we had ongoing letters of credit related to construction contracts and
certain industrial development bonds. The letters of credit by expiration period were as follows at
February 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,653 |
|
|
$ |
9,972 |
|
In addition to the above standby letters of credit, which were predominantly issued for our
industrial development bonds, we are required, in the ordinary course of business, to obtain a
surety or performance bond that commits payments to our customers for any non-performance on our
behalf. At February 28, 2009, $190.4 million of our backlog was bonded by performance bonds with a
face value of $452.8 million. Performance bonds do not have stated expiration dates, as we are
released from the bonds upon completion of the contract. With respect to our current portfolio of
businesses, we have never been required to pay on these performance-based bonds.
We self-insure a portion of our third-party product liability coverages. As a result, a material
construction project rework event would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
For fiscal 2010, we believe that current cash on hand, cash generated from operating activities and
available capacity under our committed revolving credit facility should be adequate to fund our
working capital requirements, planned capital expenditures and dividend payments.
Off-balance sheet arrangements. With the exception of routine operating leases, we had no
off-balance sheet financing arrangements at February 28, 2009 or March 1, 2008.
Outlook
We are entering fiscal 2010 with an unprecedented level of uncertainty; however the following
statements are based on current expectations for fiscal 2010. These statements are forward-looking,
and actual results may differ materially.
|
§ |
|
Overall revenues for the year are expected to be down at least 15 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Operating margins are estimated to be in the mid-single digits. |
|
|
§ |
|
Capital expenditures are projected to be less than $20 million. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See New Accounting Standards set forth in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
under Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information pertaining to recently adopted accounting standards
or accounting standards to be adopted in the future, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management has evaluated the accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of the
accompanying financial statements and related notes, and believes those policies and estimates to
be reasonable and appropriate. We believe that the most critical accounting policies and estimates
applied in the presentation of our financial statements relate to accounting for future events.
Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, management
is required to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been
incurred as well as in estimating the amount of potential loss. We have identified the following
accounting policies as critical to our business and in the understanding of our results of
operations and financial position:
25
Revenue recognition Our standard product sales terms are free on board (FOB) shipping point or
FOB destination, and revenue is recognized when title has transferred. However, our installation
business records revenue on a percentage-of- completion basis as it relates to revenues earned from
construction contracts. During fiscal 2009, approximately 31 percent of our consolidated sales and
34 percent of our Architectural segment sales were recorded on a percentage-of-completion basis.
Under this methodology, we compare the total costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs
for the contract, and record that proportion of the total contract revenue in the period. Contract
costs include materials, labor and other direct costs related to contract performance. Provisions
are established for estimated losses, if any, on uncompleted contracts in the period in which such
losses are determined. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims or other items are
included in sales only when customers have approved them. A significant number of estimates are
used in these computations.
Goodwill impairment To determine if there has been any impairment in accordance with SFAS No.
142, we evaluate the goodwill on our balance sheet annually or more frequently if impairment
indicators exist through a two-step process. In step one, we value each of our reporting units and
compare these values to the reporting units net book value, including goodwill. If the fair value
exceeds the net book value, step two is not performed, which was the case for fiscal 2009. We base
our determination of value using a discounted cash flow methodology that involves significant
judgments based upon projections of future performance. We also consider other factors such as
public information for transactions made on similar businesses to ours. A significant downward
trend in these factors could cause us to reduce the estimated fair value of some or all of our
reporting units and recognize a corresponding impairment of our goodwill in connection with a
future goodwill impairment test. There can be no assurances that these forecasts will be attained.
Changes in strategy, market conditions or market capitalization may result in an impairment of
goodwill.
Reserves for disputes and claims regarding product liability and warranties From time to time,
we are subject to claims associated with our products and services, principally as a result of
disputes with our customers involving our Architectural products. The time period from when a claim
is asserted to when it is resolved, either by dismissal, negotiation, settlement or litigation, can
be several years. While we maintain product liability insurance, the insurance policies include
significant self-retention of risk in the form of policy deductibles. In addition, certain claims
could be determined to be uninsured. We reserve based on our estimates of known claims, as well as
on anticipated claims for possible product warranty and rework costs based on historical product
liability claims as a ratio of sales.
Reserves for discontinued operations We reserve for the remaining estimated future cash outflows
associated with our exit from discontinued operations. The majority of these cash expenditures are
expected to be made within the next three years. The primary components of the accruals relate to
the remaining exit costs from the international curtainwall operations of our large-scale
construction business. These long-term accruals include settlement of outstanding performance
bonds, of which the precise degree of liability related to these matters will not be known until
they are settled within the U.K. courts. We also reserve for product liability issues and the
related legal costs for specific projects completed both domestically and internationally. We
reserve based on known claims, estimating their expected losses, as well as on anticipated claims
for possible product warranty and rework costs for these discontinued operations projects.
Self-insurance reserves We obtain substantial amounts of commercial insurance for potential
losses for general liability, workers compensation, automobile liability, employment practices,
architects and engineers errors and omissions risk, and other miscellaneous coverages. However,
an amount of risk is retained on a self-insured basis through a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary.
Reserve requirements are established based on actuarial projections of ultimate losses.
Additionally, we maintain a self-insurance reserve for our health insurance programs maintained for
the benefit of our eligible employees and non-employee directors. We estimate a reserve based on
historical levels of amounts for claims incurred but not reported.
Stock-based compensation We account for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No.
123R, which was adopted on February 26, 2006. Under this standard, the fair value of each
share-based payment award is estimated on the date of grant and, in the case of performance-based
awards, updated throughout the year. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of share-based payment awards. The determination of the fair value of share-based
payment awards utilizing the Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price and a number of
assumptions, including expected volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and expected
dividends. For other performance-based awards, we estimate the future performance of the Company as
an input into the expense and liability. Any change in the actual results from our assumptions
could have a material impact on the Companys operating results.
Income Taxes We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported
results of operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted
tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those deferred tax assets
and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. In addition, the calculation of tax
liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the
application of complex tax laws.
26
Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with managements expectations could
have a material impact on the Companys financial condition and operating results.
As part of our ongoing financial reporting process, a collaborative effort is undertaken involving
our management with responsibility for financial reporting, product and project management,
quality, legal, tax and outside advisors such as consultants, engineers, lawyers and actuaries. The
results of this effort provide management with the necessary information on which to base its
judgments on these future events and develop the estimates used to prepare the financial
statements. We believe that the amounts recorded in the accompanying financial statements related
to these events are based on the best estimates and judgments of Apogee management. However,
outcomes could differ from our estimates and could materially adversely affect our future operating
results, financial position and cash flows.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our principal market risk is sensitivity to interest rates, which is the risk that changes in
interest rates will reduce net earnings of the Company. To manage our direct risk from changes in
market interest rates, management actively monitors the interest sensitive components of our
balance sheet, primarily debt obligations and fixed income securities, as well as market interest
rates in order to minimize the impact of changes in interest rates on net earnings and cash flow.
We have historically used interest rate swaps to fix a portion of our variable rate borrowings from
fluctuations in interest rates. During fiscal 2009, we had interest rate swaps covering $20.0
million of variable rate debt, which were terminated in the fourth quarter resulting in a $0.3
million pre-tax charge to interest expense.
The interest rate swaps were designated as and were effective as cash-flow hedges, and were
included in the balance sheet with other long-term liabilities, with changes in fair values
included in other comprehensive income. Derivative gains and losses included in other comprehensive
income were reclassified into earnings at the time the related interest expense was recognized,
upon settlement or termination of the related commitment. We do not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
The primary measure of interest rate risk is the simulation of net income under different interest
rate environments. The approach used to quantify interest rate risk is a sensitivity analysis. This
approach calculates the impact on net earnings, relative to a base case scenario, of rates
increasing or decreasing gradually over the next 12 months by 200 basis points. This change in
interest rates affecting our financial instruments at February 28, 2009 would result in
approximately a $0.1 million impact to net earnings. As interest rates increase, net earnings
decrease; as interest rates decrease, net earnings increase. Besides the market risk related to
interest rate changes, the commercial construction markets in which our businesses operate are
highly affected by changes in interest rates and, therefore, significant interest rate fluctuations
could materially impact our operating results.
Our investment portfolio consists of variable rate demand note (VRDN) securities and high-quality
municipal bonds. At February 28, 2009, we had $14.1 million of VRDN securities and $20.2 million of
high-quality municipal bonds, both of which are considered available-for-sale securities. Although
these investments are subject to the credit risk of the issuer and/or letter of credit issuer, we
manage our investment portfolio to limit our exposure to any one issuer. Because of the credit risk
criteria of our investment policies and practices, the primary market risks associated with these
investments are interest rate and liquidity risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments
to manage interest rate risk or to speculate on future changes in interest rates. A rise in
interest rates could negatively affect the fair value of our municipal bond portfolio.
We generally do not have significant exposure to foreign exchange risk as the majority of our sales
are within the United States and those outside the United States are generally denominated in U.S.
dollars.
27
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. The Companys internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of February 28, 2009, using criteria set forth in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this assessment, the Companys management believes that, as of February 28,
2009, the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those
criteria.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued a
report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
February 28, 2009. That report is set forth immediately following the report of Deloitte & Touche
LLP on the consolidated financial statements included herein.
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008, and the related
consolidated results of operations, statements of cash flows, and statements of shareholders
equity for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2009. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the table of contents at Item 15. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its methods of
accounting for uncertain tax positions in the year ended March 1, 2008, and share-based
compensation and defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in the year ended March 3,
2007.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries at February 28, 2009 and March
1, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended February 28, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of February 28,
2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 28,
2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 28, 2009
29
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.:
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 28, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of February 28, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
listed in the Table of Contents at Item 15 as of and for the year ended February 28, 2009, of the
Company, and our report dated April 28, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 28, 2009
30
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
March 1, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,994 |
|
|
$ |
12,264 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
14,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
148,608 |
|
|
|
189,378 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
39,484 |
|
|
|
46,862 |
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
5,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
228,688 |
|
|
|
259,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
203,514 |
|
|
|
176,676 |
|
Marketable securities available for sale |
|
|
20,160 |
|
|
|
21,751 |
|
Investments in affiliated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,725 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
58,518 |
|
|
|
60,977 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
16,302 |
|
|
|
19,979 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
527,684 |
|
|
$ |
563,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
45,022 |
|
|
$ |
71,478 |
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits |
|
|
25,530 |
|
|
|
30,172 |
|
Accrued self-insurance reserves |
|
|
8,317 |
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
22,432 |
|
|
|
22,202 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
54,845 |
|
|
|
39,507 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
157,292 |
|
|
|
177,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
58,200 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
15,614 |
|
|
|
13,520 |
|
Long-term self-insurance reserves |
|
|
11,849 |
|
|
|
12,269 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
4,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
10,254 |
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
3,397 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of $0.33-1/3 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding, 27,781,488 and 28,745,351, respectively |
|
|
9,260 |
|
|
|
9,582 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
97,852 |
|
|
|
95,252 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
209,537 |
|
|
|
181,772 |
|
Common stock held in trust |
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
(3,425 |
) |
Deferred compensation obligations |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
316,624 |
|
|
|
284,582 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
527,684 |
|
|
$ |
563,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. |
31
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-Ended |
|
Year-Ended |
|
Year-Ended |
|
|
Feb. 28, 2009 |
|
Mar. 1, 2008 |
|
Mar. 3, 2007 |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
(52 weeks) |
|
(52 weeks) |
|
(53 weeks) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
925,502 |
|
|
$ |
881,809 |
|
|
$ |
778,847 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
724,754 |
|
|
|
696,659 |
|
|
|
630,433 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
200,748 |
|
|
|
185,150 |
|
|
|
148,414 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
123,093 |
|
|
|
118,691 |
|
|
|
100,689 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
77,655 |
|
|
|
66,459 |
|
|
|
47,725 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
2,652 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Equity in (loss) earnings of affiliated companies |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
Gain on sale of (impairment charge on) investment in affiliated
company |
|
|
1,954 |
|
|
|
(5,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
78,706 |
|
|
|
62,302 |
|
|
|
48,799 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
27,511 |
|
|
|
19,132 |
|
|
|
17,147 |
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
51,195 |
|
|
|
43,170 |
|
|
|
31,652 |
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
5,381 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
51,035 |
|
|
$ |
48,551 |
|
|
$ |
31,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
27,746 |
|
|
|
28,319 |
|
|
|
27,688 |
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
28,181 |
|
|
|
29,054 |
|
|
|
28,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.311 |
|
|
$ |
0.283 |
|
|
$ |
0.265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. |
32
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-Ended |
|
Year-Ended |
|
Year-Ended |
|
|
Feb. 28, 2009 |
|
Mar. 1, 2008 |
|
Mar. 3, 2007 |
(In thousands) |
|
(52 weeks) |
|
(52 weeks) |
|
(53 weeks) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
51,035 |
|
|
$ |
48,551 |
|
|
$ |
31,653 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (earnings) from discontinued operations |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(5,381 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,307 |
|
|
|
22,776 |
|
|
|
18,536 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
7,374 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,328 |
|
|
|
(2,598 |
) |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
(2,565 |
) |
|
|
(1,829 |
) |
Results from equity method investee |
|
|
(1,868 |
) |
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
(2,724 |
) |
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
40,770 |
|
|
|
(21,014 |
) |
|
|
(21,845 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(29,279 |
) |
|
|
13,850 |
|
|
|
15,880 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
15,338 |
|
|
|
19,824 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
Refundable and accrued income taxes |
|
|
(7,013 |
) |
|
|
4,404 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
|
116,298 |
|
|
|
86,235 |
|
|
|
48,071 |
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(55,184 |
) |
|
|
(55,208 |
) |
|
|
(39,893 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment in affiliated company |
|
|
27,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(45,691 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
Proceeds on note from equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments and marketable securities |
|
|
(59,323 |
) |
|
|
(34,263 |
) |
|
|
(36,742 |
) |
Sales/maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
46,956 |
|
|
|
31,224 |
|
|
|
35,672 |
|
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
|
(40,239 |
) |
|
|
(103,584 |
) |
|
|
(34,757 |
) |
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (payments on) proceeds from revolving credit agreement |
|
|
(49,800 |
) |
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
(9,800 |
) |
Payments on debt issue costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Stock issued to employees, net of shares withheld |
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
6,702 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(14,646 |
) |
|
|
(5,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(8,800 |
) |
|
|
(8,192 |
) |
|
|
(9,312 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing financing activities |
|
|
(74,758 |
) |
|
|
14,843 |
|
|
|
(10,652 |
) |
|
Cash Flows of Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,449 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
8,583 |
|
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
6,077 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
12,264 |
|
|
|
6,187 |
|
|
|
4,676 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
12,994 |
|
|
$ |
12,264 |
|
|
$ |
6,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in accounts payable |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. |
33
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
Shares |
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Stock Held |
|
Compensation |
|
Unearned |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
per share data) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
in Trust |
|
Obligation |
|
Compensation |
|
(Loss) Income |
|
Earnings (Loss) |
|
Bal. at Feb. 25, 2006 |
|
|
27,857 |
|
|
$ |
9,286 |
|
|
$ |
69,380 |
|
|
$ |
125,193 |
|
|
$ |
(5,416 |
) |
|
$ |
5,416 |
|
|
$ |
(4,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,653 |
|
Unrealized gain on
marketable securities,
net of $72 tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Unrealized gain on
derivatives, net of $15
tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Adoption of SFAS 158 net
of $1,267 tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially
apply SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock, net
of cancellations |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based comp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated
with stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
8,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other share retirements |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.265
per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bal. at Mar. 3, 2007 |
|
|
28,550 |
|
|
$ |
9,517 |
|
|
$ |
81,031 |
|
|
$ |
147,248 |
|
|
$ |
(4,473 |
) |
|
$ |
4,473 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
(2,128 |
) |
|
$ |
31,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,551 |
|
Adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on
marketable securities,
net of $137 tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
Unrealized loss on
derivatives, net of $8
tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Unrealized gain on
pension obligation, net
of $214 tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Issuance of stock, net
of cancellations |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based comp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated
with stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
5,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(4,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other share retirements |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(2,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.283
per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bal. at Mar. 1, 2008 |
|
|
28,745 |
|
|
$ |
9,582 |
|
|
$ |
95,252 |
|
|
$ |
181,772 |
|
|
$ |
(3,425 |
) |
|
$ |
3,425 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
(2,024 |
) |
|
$ |
48,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,035 |
|
Adoption of SFAS 158
measurement date
provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on
marketable securities,
net of $38 tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Unrealized gain on
pension obligation, net
of $1,099 tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
Issuance of stock, net
of cancellations |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based comp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated
with stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases |
|
|
(1,130 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(3,915 |
) |
|
|
(10,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other share retirements |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(3,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.311
per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bal. at Feb. 28, 2009 |
|
|
27,781 |
|
|
$ |
9,260 |
|
|
$ |
97,852 |
|
|
$ |
209,537 |
|
|
$ |
(1,046 |
) |
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
|
$ |
-- |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
53,034 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Related Data
Basis of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Apogee Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and all majority-owned subsidiaries (the
Company). Transactions between Apogee and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.
The equity method of accounting is used for the Companys equity investments, in which we have
significant influence over the investee, and, as a result, our share of the earnings or losses of
such investments is included in the results of operations and our share of these companies
shareholders equity is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Fiscal Year. Apogees fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to February 28. Fiscal 2009 and
2008 each consisted of 52 weeks and fiscal 2007 consisted of 53 weeks.
Financial Instruments. Unless otherwise noted, the carrying amount of the Companys financial
instruments approximates fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Investments with an original maturity of three months or less are
included in cash and cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair
value, and consist primarily of money market funds.
Investments. The Company has marketable securities consisting primarily of variable rate demand
note (VRDN) securities and high-quality municipal bonds. Both types of securities are classified as
available for sale and are carried at fair value based on prices from recent trades of similar
securities. The Company tests for other than temporary losses on a quarterly basis and whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. If a decline in the fair value of a security is deemed by management to be
other-than-temporary, the investment is written down to fair value, and the amount of the
write-down is included in net earnings.
Inventories. Inventories, which consist primarily of purchased glass and aluminum, are valued at
the lower of cost or market. Approximately 63 percent of the inventories are valued by use of the
last-in, first-out method, which does not exceed market. If the first-in, first-out method had been
used, inventories would have been $8.8 million and $3.9 million higher than reported at February
28, 2009, and March 1, 2008, respectively.
Property, Plant and Equipment. Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost. Significant
improvements and renewals that extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized. Repairs and
maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. When property is retired or otherwise disposed of,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related gains
or losses are included in income as a reduction to or increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis, based on the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
15 to 25 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
3 to 15 |
|
Office equipment and furniture |
|
|
3 to 10 |
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the net
tangible and identified intangible assets of acquired businesses. The Company accounts for goodwill
and intangible assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and has determined that it does not have any intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives other than goodwill. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if events warrant. Intangible assets with discrete useful lives are
amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company tests goodwill of each of its reporting
units for impairment annually in connection with its fourth quarter planning process or more
frequently if impairment indicators exist. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company
experienced a decrease in its market capitalization below book value, which is considered a
possible impairment indicator. Accordingly, the Company performed an interim test of goodwill
impairment on each of its reporting units and, based on the results of this testing, concluded that
none of the goodwill was impaired as of November 29, 2008. During the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009, using discounted cash flow methodologies, we completed our annual impairment test for
goodwill and
35
determined there was no impairment charge required. In addition, the Company reassessed the useful lives of its identifiable
intangible assets and determined that the remaining lives were appropriate.
Long-Lived Assets. The carrying value of long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment,
intangible assets and investments in affiliated companies is reviewed when impairment indicators
exist as required under generally accepted accounting principles. We consider many factors,
including short- and long-term projections of future performance associated with these assets. If
this review indicates that the long-lived assets will not be recoverable, the carrying value of
such assets will be reduced to estimated fair value.
Self-Insurance. The Company obtains commercial insurance for potential losses for general
liability, workers compensation, automobile liability, employment practices, architects and
engineers errors and omissions risk and other miscellaneous coverages. However, a reasonable
amount of risk is retained on a self-insured basis primarily through a wholly-owned insurance
subsidiary, Prism Assurance, Inc. (Prism). Reserve requirements are established based on actuarial
projections of ultimate losses. Losses estimated to be paid within 12 months are classified as
accrued expenses, while losses expected to be payable in later periods are included in long-term
self-insurance liabilities. Additionally, we maintain a self-insurance reserve for our health
insurance programs maintained for the benefit of our eligible employees and non-employee directors.
We estimate a reserve based on historical levels of amounts incurred, but not reported.
Environmental Liability. In accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 96-1, Environmental
Remediation Liabilities, we recognize environmental clean-up liabilities on an undiscounted basis
when loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. The cost of the clean-up is estimated by
engineering, financial and legal specialists based on current law. Such estimates are based
primarily upon the estimated cost of investigation and remediation required and the likelihood
that, where applicable, other potentially responsible parties will not be able to fulfill their
commitments at the sites where the Company may be jointly and severally liable. As part of the
acquisition of Tubelite, Inc. (Tubelite) described in Note 6, the Company acquired property which
contains historical environmental conditions that it intends to remediate. Accordingly, as part of
the purchase price allocation, the Company recorded $2.5 million in reserves. At February 28, 2009
the reserve was $2.3 million. The reserve for environmental liabilities is included in other
accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition. Generally, our sales terms are free on board (FOB) shipping point or FOB
destination for our product-type sales, and revenue is recognized when title has transferred.
Revenue excludes sales taxes as the Company considers itself a pass-through conduit for collecting
and remitting sales taxes. The Company recognizes revenue from construction contracts on a
percentage-of-completion basis, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to estimated
total costs for each contract, and records that proportion of the total contract revenue in that
period. Contract costs include materials, labor and other direct costs related to contract
performance. Provisions are established for estimated losses, if any, on uncompleted contracts in
the period in which such losses are determined. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims
or other items are included in sales only when they have been approved by customers. Approximately
31 percent, 33 percent and 35 percent of our consolidated sales in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, were recorded on a percentage-of-completion basis.
Pricing and Sales Incentives. The Company records estimated reductions to revenue for customer
programs and incentive offerings including pricing arrangements, promotions and other volume-based
incentives at the later of the date revenue is recognized or the incentive is offered. Sales
incentives given to customers are recorded as a reduction to net sales unless (1) the Company
receives an identifiable benefit for goods or services in exchange for the consideration and (2)
the Company can reasonably estimate the fair value of the benefit received.
Shipping and Handling. All amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to shipping
and handling represent revenues earned and are reported as revenues. The costs incurred by the
Company for shipping and handling are reported as cost of sales.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred
and were $9.3 million, $11.1 million and $11.7 million for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Of this amount, $6.3 million, $9.9 million and $10.7 million, respectively, was
focused primarily upon design of custom window and curtainwall systems in accordance with customer
specifications and is included in cost of sales.
36
Advertising. Advertising expenses are charged to operations as incurred and were $1.5 million in
each of fiscal 2009 and 2008 and were $1.6 million for fiscal 2007 and are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated results of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS
No. 123R), which was adopted on February 26, 2006. Under this standard, the fair value of each
share-based payment award is estimated on the date of grant using an option pricing model that
meets certain requirements. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of share-based payment awards. The determination of the fair value of share-based
payment awards utilizing the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Companys stock price and a
number of assumptions, including expected volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and
expected dividends. See Note 12 for additional information regarding share-based compensation.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes as prescribed by SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, which requires use of the asset and liability method. This method recognizes deferred
tax assets and liabilities based upon the future tax consequences of temporary differences between
financial and tax reporting.
The Company adopted Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109 (FIN 48) on March 4, 2007, the beginning of the Companys fiscal
year 2008. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income tax by prescribing a recognition threshold
that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the consolidated financial
statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. See Note 13 for additional
information regarding FIN 48.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans. The Company adopted the measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R) (SFAS No. 158) in fiscal 2009. SFAS No. 158 requires
employers to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end. The adoption of
the measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 resulted in a $0.1 million charge to retained
earnings. See Note 10 for additional information about the Companys defined-benefit pension plans.
Derivatives. The Company recognizes all derivatives, including those embedded in other contracts,
as either assets or liabilities at fair value in our balance sheet. If the derivative is designated
as a fair-value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item are
recognized in earnings. If the derivative is designated and is effective as a cash-flow hedge,
changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income and are
recognized in the consolidated results of operations when the hedged item affects earnings. For a
derivative that is not designated as or does not qualify as a hedge, changes in fair value are
reported in earnings immediately.
Historically, the Company has used derivative instruments to manage the risk that changes in
interest rates will affect the amount of its future interest payments. The derivative instruments
were designated as effective cash-flow hedges. The Company does not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Accounting Estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Amounts subject to
significant estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, assessment of recoverability
of long-lived assets, including goodwill, insurance reserves, warranty reserves, reserves related
to discontinued operations, net sales recognition for construction contracts, income tax provisions
and liabilities, and the status of outstanding disputes and claims. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
New Accounting Standards. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). This statement clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements, but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in
various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, the Companys fiscal year 2009. The implementation date for applying SFAS No.
157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities has been extended
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, the Companys fiscal year 2010. The adoption of
37
SFAS No. 157 as of March 2, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations and financial condition. See Note 4 for
additional information about the Companys fair value measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159), which
becomes effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007, the Companys fiscal year
2009. Under SFAS No. 159, companies may elect to measure specified financial instruments, and
warranty and insurance contracts at fair value on a contract-by-contract basis, with changes in
fair value recognized in earnings each reporting period. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 had no impact
on the Companys consolidated results of operations and financial condition as the Company did not
elect any fair-value measurements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R), which
replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 141R requires assets and liabilities acquired in a business
combination, contingent consideration, and certain acquired contingencies to be measured at their
fair values as of the date of acquisition. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply SFAS No. 141R prospectively to
business combinations completed on or after that date. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R will have no
impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations and financial condition as presented
herein.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). This standard requires all entities to
report minority interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements, and
requires that transactions between entities and noncontrolling interests be treated as equity. SFAS
No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, the Companys fiscal year
2010. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have no impact on the Companys consolidated results of
operations and financial condition as presented herein.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, but does not change FASB Statement
No. 133s scope or accounting. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company did not have any derivative instruments at February
28, 2009.
2 Working Capital
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Trade accounts |
|
$ |
88,151 |
|
|
$ |
107,870 |
|
Construction contracts |
|
|
33,954 |
|
|
|
53,802 |
|
Contract retainage |
|
|
26,312 |
|
|
|
24,571 |
|
|
Other receivables |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
Total receivables |
|
|
150,682 |
|
|
|
191,121 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(2,074 |
) |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
Net receivables |
|
$ |
148,608 |
|
|
$ |
189,378 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
15,385 |
|
|
$ |
18,769 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
9,974 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
13,558 |
|
|
|
14,290 |
|
Costs and earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
39,484 |
|
|
$ |
46,862 |
|
|
38
Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes |
|
$ |
3,543 |
|
|
$ |
3,422 |
|
Retirement savings plan |
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
5,521 |
|
Volume and pricing discounts |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
Warranties |
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
Interest |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,536 |
|
|
|
7,261 |
|
|
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
22,432 |
|
|
$ |
22,202 |
|
|
3 Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
5,789 |
|
|
$ |
4,939 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
125,833 |
|
|
|
99,068 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
215,166 |
|
|
|
181,253 |
|
Office equipment and furniture |
|
|
39,716 |
|
|
|
33,859 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
10,950 |
|
|
|
30,621 |
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
397,454 |
|
|
|
349,740 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(193,940 |
) |
|
|
(173,064 |
) |
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
203,514 |
|
|
$ |
176,676 |
|
|
Depreciation expense was $25.7 million, $21.4 million and $17.4 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
4 Financial Assets
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 as discussed in Note 1, as of March 2, 2008. This standard defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs
are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2
inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration,
for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs
based on the Companys assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A
financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Total Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Value |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,132 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,132 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,066 |
|
Marketable debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,160 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,132 |
|
|
$ |
34,226 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43,358 |
|
|
Short-term investments
The Company has marketable securities of $14.1 million as of February 28, 2009, consisting
primarily of variable rate demand note securities. The Companys VRDN investments are of high
credit quality and secured by direct-pay letters of credit from major financial institutions. These
investments have variable rates tied to short-term interest rates. Interest rates are reset weekly
and these VRDN securities can be tendered for sale upon notice (every seven days) to the trustee.
Although the Companys VRDN securities are issued and rated as long-term securities (with
maturities ranging from 2029 through 2052), they are priced and traded as short-term instruments.
The Company classifies these short-term investments as available-for-sale in accordance with SFAS
No. 115, Accounting for
39
Certain Instruments in Debt and Equity Securities. The investments are carried at fair market value
based on prices from recent trades of similar securities and are classified as Level 2 in the
valuation hierarchy. As of February 28, 2009, there were no realized or unrealized gains or losses
related to these securities.
Marketable securities available for sale
The Companys wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Prism, insures a portion of the Companys workers
compensation, general liability and automobile liability risks using reinsurance agreements to meet
statutory requirements. The reinsurance carrier requires Prism to maintain fixed maturity
investments, which are generally high-quality municipal bonds, for the purpose of providing
collateral for Prisms obligations under the reinsurance agreement. Prisms fixed maturity
investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at market value as prescribed by
SFAS No. 115 and are reported as marketable securities available for sale in the consolidated
balance sheet. Unrealized gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss,
net of income taxes, until the investments are sold or upon impairment. These investments are
carried at fair value based on prices from recent trades of similar securities and are classified
as Level 2 in the valuation hierarchy.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair values of investments
available for sale at February 28, 2009 and March 1, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate demand notes |
|
$ |
14,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,066 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
20,323 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
20,160 |
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
34,389 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
(545 |
) |
|
$ |
34,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
22,021 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
21,751 |
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
22,021 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
21,751 |
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 115, the Company tests for other than temporary losses on a quarterly
basis and has considered the unrealized losses indicated above to be temporary in nature. The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments at February 28, 2009 by contractual
maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers
may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Estimated |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Market Value |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
14,521 |
|
|
$ |
14,524 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
Due after five years through 10 years |
|
|
9,368 |
|
|
|
9,496 |
|
Due after 10 years through 15 years |
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
Due beyond 15 years |
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,389 |
|
|
$ |
34,226 |
|
|
Gross realized gains of $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and gross realized losses of $0.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $0.1 million in each of
fiscal 2008 and 2007 were recognized and are included in other (expense) income, net in the
accompanying consolidated results of operations.
5 Equity Investments
In fiscal 2001, the Company and PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) combined their U.S. automotive
replacement glass distribution businesses into a joint venture, PPG Auto Glass, LLC (PPG Auto
Glass), of which the Company had a 34 percent interest. During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, in
connection with PPGs sale of its automotive replacement glass businesses, Apogee exercised its
right to sell its minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture, resulting in cash proceeds
of $27.1 million and a pretax gain on sale of approximately $2.0 million.
The Companys investment in PPG Auto Glass was $22.7 million at March 1, 2008 and the excess of the
cost of the investment over the value of the underlying net tangible assets when the joint venture
was formed was $2.5 million.
40
This excess was reported as goodwill, and was written off upon the
sale of the PPG Auto Glass joint venture. During
the third quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company performed an assessment of the fair value of this
asset in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of
Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, which resulted in an impairment charge of $4.7 million.
In addition, the Company had another equity-method investment totaling $0.3 million that was
written off in fiscal 2008. The impairment charge and write-off were included in the impairment
charge on investment in affiliated company in the accompanying consolidated results of operations.
6 Acquisitions
On December 21, 2007, the Company acquired all of the shares of Tubelite, Inc., a privately held
business, for $45.7 million, including transaction costs of $1.0 million and net of cash acquired
of $0.9 million. Tubelites results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial
statements and within the Architectural segment since the date of acquisition. Tubelite fabricates
aluminum storefront, entrance and curtainwall products for the U.S. commercial construction
industry.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 21, |
(In thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
12,203 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
7,415 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
17,578 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
21,740 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(4,522 |
) |
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
(8,699 |
) |
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
45,715 |
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets are definite-lived assets. These assets include customer
relationships, trademarks and non-compete agreements and have a weighted average amortization
period of 15 years which matches the weighted average useful life of the assets. Goodwill recorded
as part of the purchase price allocation is not tax deductible.
The following pro forma consolidated condensed financial results of operations for the year ended
March 1, 2008 and March 3, 2007 are presented as if the acquisition had been completed at the
beginning of each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
Pro forma |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
931,285 |
|
|
$ |
833,353 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
44,894 |
|
|
|
33,277 |
|
Net income |
|
|
50,275 |
|
|
|
33,278 |
|
|
Earnings per share continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,319 |
|
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
29,054 |
|
|
|
28,246 |
|
|
These pro forma consolidated condensed financial results have been prepared for comparative
purposes only and include certain adjustments, such as increased interest expense on acquisition
debt. The adjustments do not reflect the effect of synergies that would have been expected to
result from integration of this acquisition.
7 Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill, net of accumulated amortization, attributable to
each business segment for the year ended February 28, 2009 is detailed below. Corporate and Other
included the excess of the cost of the investment over the value of the underlying net tangible
assets related to the formation of the PPG Auto Glass joint venture. The PPG Auto Glass joint
venture was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and as a result, the $2.5 million of goodwill
associated with this business was written off.
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Architectural |
|
LSO |
|
and Other |
|
Total |
|
Balance, March 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
47,901 |
|
|
$ |
10,557 |
|
|
$ |
2,519 |
|
|
$ |
60,977 |
|
Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
PPG Auto Glass sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
Balance, February 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
47,961 |
|
|
$ |
10,557 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,518 |
|
|
The Companys identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are being amortized over their
estimated useful lives and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
Debt issue costs |
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
(1,601 |
) |
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
2,056 |
|
|
$ |
(1,484 |
) |
|
$ |
572 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
5,839 |
|
|
|
(3,187 |
) |
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
5,839 |
|
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
3,673 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
12,092 |
|
|
|
(3,908 |
) |
|
|
8,184 |
|
|
|
12,092 |
|
|
|
(1,615 |
) |
|
|
10,477 |
|
Purchased intellectual
property |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,799 |
|
|
$ |
(9,497 |
) |
|
$ |
16,302 |
|
|
$ |
25,787 |
|
|
$ |
(5,808 |
) |
|
$ |
19,979 |
|
|
Amortization expense on these identifiable intangible assets was $3.7 million and $1.5 million in
fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amortization expense associated with the debt issue costs
is included in interest expense while the remainder is in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the consolidated results of operations. The estimated future amortization expense for
identifiable intangible assets during the next five fiscal years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense |
|
$ |
2,933 |
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,701 |
|
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 Long-Term Debt
The Company maintains a $100.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires in November 2011.
No borrowings were outstanding as of February 28, 2009. The credit facility requires the Company to
maintain a minimum level of net worth as defined in the credit facility based on certain quarterly
financial calculations. The minimum required net worth computed in accordance with the credit
agreement at February 28, 2009 was $247.7 million, whereas the Companys net worth as defined in
the credit facility was $316.6 million. The credit facility also requires that the Company maintain
a debt-to-cash flow ratio of no more than 2.75. This ratio is computed daily, with cash flow
computed on a rolling 12-month basis. The Companys ratio was 0.08 at February 28, 2009. If the
Company is not in compliance with either of these covenants, the lender may terminate the
commitment and/or declare any loan then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. At February
28, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants of the credit facility.
Long-term debt also includes $8.4 million of industrial development bonds that mature in fiscal
years 2021 through 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement, interest at 4.9% for 2008* |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,800 |
|
Other, interest at 1.0% and 3.2% for 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
58,200 |
|
Less current installments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term debt |
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
58,200 |
|
|
* |
|
Interest rate excludes the impact of swaps. |
The Companys $8.4 million of industrial revenue bonds, included in the totals above, are supported
by $8.7 million of letters of credit that reduce the Companys availability of funds under the
$100.0 million credit facility.
42
Long-term debt maturities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Maturities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
The Company had entered into two interest rate swap agreements in the first quarter of fiscal 2009
that converted $20.0 million of variable rate borrowings into fixed-rate obligations. Both interest
rate swaps were terminated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, resulting in a $0.3 million charge
to interest expense. At March 1, 2008, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement that
converted $3.5 million of variable rate borrowings into a fixed-rate obligation, this agreement
expired during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
The variable to fixed interest rate swaps were designated as and were effective as cash-flow
hedges, and were included in the balance sheet with other long-term liabilities, with changes in
fair values included in other comprehensive income. Derivative gains and losses included in other
comprehensive income were reclassified into earnings at the time the related interest expense was
recognized or upon settlement of the related commitment. Gains or losses on ineffectiveness were
not material.
Selected information related to long-term debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Average daily borrowings during the year |
|
$ |
50,538 |
|
|
$ |
39,895 |
|
Maximum borrowings outstanding during the year |
|
|
81,800 |
|
|
|
66,500 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the year, excluding swap agreements |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate during the year, including swap agreements |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
9 Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Interest on debt |
|
$ |
2,038 |
|
|
$ |
2,478 |
|
|
$ |
3,416 |
|
Other interest expense |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Less capitalized interest |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
Less interest allocated to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
Net interest expense |
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
|
$ |
2,485 |
|
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
|
Interest payments were $2.5 million, $2.6 million and $3.7 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. As a portion of the total interest expense related to funds borrowed to purchase
major facilities, information systems and equipment installations, the Company capitalized a
portion of the interest payments and will depreciate them over the lives of the related assets.
Net interest expense allocated to discontinued operations is computed based on the ratio of net
operating assets of discontinued operations to consolidated net assets.
10 Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Retirement Plan
The Company sponsors a single 401(k) retirement plan covering substantially all full-time non-union
employees and union employees at one of its manufacturing facilities. This plan includes an annual
Company contribution based on a percentage of employees base earnings and years of service with
the Company. The contribution was $5.0 million, $4.7 million and $4.2 million in fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Of the total contributions in fiscal 2008 and 2007, $0.1 million and $0.2
million, respectively, represented contributions related to discontinued operations.
In addition to the contribution above, employees are also allowed to contribute up to 60 percent of
their eligible earnings to this plan, up to statutory limits. The Company contributes a match of 30
percent of the first six percent of eligible compensation that non-union employees contribute. The
Company match for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $2.2 million, $2.0 million and $1.8 million,
respectively. Of the total match made by the Company, $0.1 million in each of fiscal 2008 and 2007
represented contributions related to discontinued operations.
43
Plans under Collective Bargaining Agreements
The Company contributes to various multi-employer union retirement plans, which provide retirement
benefits to the majority of its union employees. The total contribution to these plans in fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were $8.1 million, $7.9 million and $7.3 million. The
Multi-employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 defines certain employer obligations under
multi-employer plans. The Company does not have information regarding union retirement plans from
plan administrators to enable the Company to determine its share of any unfunded vested
liabilities.
Pension Plan
As part of the acquisition of Tubelite in fiscal 2008, the Company assumed the assets and
liabilities of the Tubelite, Inc. Hourly Employees Pension Plan (Tubelite plan). This plan is a
defined-benefit pension plan that was frozen to new entrants and additional years of service credit
for participating employees as of January 1, 2004.
Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)
The Company sponsors an unfunded SERP for the benefit of certain executives. The plan is considered
a defined-benefit pension plan which is based principally on an employees years of service and
compensation levels near retirement.
On October 8, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors adopted an amendment to the Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan providing that no more benefits
will accrue to plan participants as of December 31, 2008. Plan participants will continue to earn
service for the purpose of becoming vested in the benefits they had accrued as of December 31,
2008. The Company incurred $1.0 million of expense in fiscal 2009 associated with the curtailment
of the SERP.
Obligations and Funded Status of Defined-Benefit Pensions Plans
The following tables present reconciliations of the benefit obligation of the defined-benefit
pension plans and the funded status of the defined-benefit pension plans. The Company adopted the
measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 for fiscal 2009, resulting in a $0.1 million charge to
retained earnings. Accordingly, both the Tubelite plan and the SERP used a fiscal year-end
measurement date for fiscal 2009 while both plans used a December 31 measurement date for fiscal
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation beginning of period |
|
$ |
12,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,349 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Actuarial gain |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
Benefit obligation assumed in acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,849 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at measurement date |
|
$ |
10,392 |
|
|
$ |
12,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets beginning of period |
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions |
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
Fair value of plan assets from acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at measurement date |
|
$ |
4,781 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at measurement date |
|
$ |
(5,611 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,709 |
) |
Contributions paid after measurement date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
(5,611 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,493 |
) |
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Other non-current assets |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(5,542 |
) |
|
|
(7,199 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(5,611 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,493 |
) |
|
44
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss that have not yet been recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Net actuarial (gain) loss |
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
Transition obligation |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (gain) loss |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
|
The amount recognized in comprehensive earnings for fiscal 2009, net of tax expense, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
Net actuarial gain |
|
$ |
(845 |
) |
Prior service cost |
|
|
(1,101 |
) |
Transition obligation |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,928 |
) |
|
The accumulated benefit obligation of the defined-benefit pension plans is $10.4 million and $10.2
million at the measurement date for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Components of the defined-benefit pension plans net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized transition amount |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Curtailment loss |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
$ |
775 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
The estimated net actuarial gain for the defined-benefit pension plans that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost for fiscal 2010 is $0.1
million, net of tax expense.
Additional Information
Assumptions
Weighted-average assumptions used at the measurement date to determine the defined-benefit plans
benefit obligation for the following fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used at the measurement date to determine the defined-benefit plans
net periodic benefit cost for the following fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Discount rate. The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the defined-benefit plans
pension liabilities could be effectively settled at the end of the year based on the measurement
date. The discount rate was determined by matching the expected benefit payments to payments from a
stream of AA or higher bonds available in the marketplace, adjusted to eliminate the effects of
call provisions. This produced a discount rate of 6.75 percent. There are no known or anticipated
changes in the discount rate assumption that will impact the pension expense in fiscal year 2010.
45
Expected return on assets. To develop the expected long-term rate of return on asset assumption,
the Company considered historical long-term rates of return for broad asset classes, actual past
rates of return achieved by the plan, the general mix of assets held by the plan and the stated
investment policy for the plan. This resulted in the selection of the 5.50 percent long-term rate
of return on assets assumption.
Net periodic benefit cost. Total net periodic pension benefit cost was $1.8 million in fiscal 2009
and $0.8 million in each of fiscal 2008 and 2007. Total net periodic pension benefit cost is
expected to be approximately $0.6 million in fiscal 2010. The net periodic pension benefit cost for
fiscal 2010 has been estimated assuming a discount rate of 6.75 percent.
Contributions
Pension contributions to the plans for fiscal 2009 and 2008 totaled $1.0 million and $0.5 million,
respectively. Since the SERP is unfunded, contributions to that plan represent benefit payments
made. The pension contributions in fiscal 2009 and 2008 equaled or exceeded the minimum funding
requirement. Fiscal 2010 pension contributions are expected to total $0.5 million.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected
to be paid by the plans as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$ |
619 |
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
622 |
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
628 |
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
624 |
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
|
624 |
|
Fiscal 2015-2018
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
Plan Assets
The Company does not maintain assets intended for the future use of the SERP. In accordance with
its current policy, the assets of the Tubelite plan have been invested in fixed-income securities.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company also sponsors an employee stock purchase plan into which its employees and non-employee
directors may contribute up to $500 per week on an after-tax basis. The Company contributes a match
of 15 percent of the employee or non-employee director contribution. Effective February 28, 2009,
non-employee directors are no longer eligible to contribute to this plan. Contributions and Company
match funds are used to purchase shares of Company stock on the open market. The Company match to
this plan was $0.1 million in each of fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007.
11 Shareholders Equity
A class of 200,000 shares of junior preferred stock with a par value of $1.00 is authorized, but
unissued.
Shareholders Rights Plan
The Company has a Shareholders Rights Plan, under which each share of outstanding common stock has
an associated preferred share purchase right. The rights are exercisable only under certain
circumstances, including the acquisition by a person or group of 10 percent of the outstanding
shares of the Companys common stock. Upon exercise, the rights would allow holders of such rights
to purchase common stock of Apogee or an acquiring company at a discounted price, which generally
would be 50 percent of the respective stocks current fair market value.
Share Repurchases
During fiscal 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of 1,500,000
shares of common stock. The Board of Directors increased this authorization by 750,000 shares in
January 2008 and by 1,000,000 in October 2008. The Company repurchased 535,324 shares in the open
market under this program, for a total of $7.2 million, through February 25, 2006. No share
repurchases were made under this plan during fiscal 2007. The Company repurchased 338,569 shares in
the open market during fiscal 2008 for $5.4 million. During fiscal 2009, the Company repurchased
1,130,230 shares in the open market for $14.6 million under the program. Therefore, the
46
Company has
purchased a total of 2,004,123 shares, at a total cost of $27.3 million, since the inception of
this
program and has remaining authority to repurchase 1,245,877 shares under this program, which has no
expiration date.
In addition to the shares repurchased according to this repurchase plan, the Company also purchased
$5.0 million, $3.1 million and $2.1 million of Company stock from employees pursuant to terms of
board and shareholder approved compensation plans during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table summarizes the accumulated other comprehensive loss at February 28, 2009 and
March 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
$ |
(106 |
) |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
Pension liability adjustments |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,024 |
) |
|
12 Share-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plan
The 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the
Plans) provide for the issuance of 3,400,000 and 2,500,000 shares, respectively, for various forms
of stock-based compensation to employees and directors. On June 28, 2006, the shareholders approved
the Amended and Restated 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares for
issuance under the plan from 1,800,000 to 3,400,000. Awards under these Plans, either in the form
of incentive stock options, nonstatutory options or stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs),
are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Companys stock at the
date of award. Nonvested share awards are also included in these Plans. Outstanding options issued
to employees generally vest ratably over a four-year period, outstanding SARs vest over a
three-year period and outstanding options issued to non-employee directors vest at the end of six
months. Outstanding options and SARs have a 10-year term. Nonvested share awards generally vest
over a two, three or four-year period. As of February 28, 2009, there were 975,357 shares available
for future issuance under the Amended and Restated 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, assuming
performance shares granted at target as discussed in the Executive Compensation Program below.
The 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan was terminated in January 2006; no new grants may be made
under the plan, although vesting and exercises of options and vesting of nonvested share awards
previously granted thereunder will still occur in accordance with the terms of the various grants
and the plan.
Total stock-based compensation expense included in the results of operations for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007 was $2.9 million, $7.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively. At February 28, 2009, there
was $2.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to SAR awards, which is expected
to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 16 months.
Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $2.1 million, $6.0 million and $8.8 million
for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax
deductions from option exercises totaled $0.4 million, $2.2 million, and $1.2 million for fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The weighted average fair value per option or SAR for those granted in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007
was $7.37, $9.17 and $6.53, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of these securities (the
amount by which the stock price on the date of exercise exceeded the stock price of the award on
the date of grant) exercised in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1.8 million, $7.4 million and $3.7
million, respectively.
The fair value of each award grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
41.3 |
% |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
|
4.5 |
years |
|
|
4.5 |
years |
|
|
4.6 |
years |
|
47
The expected stock price volatility is based on historical experience. The risk-free interest rate
is based on the U.S. Treasury Strip rate whose term is consistent with the expected life of the
Companys stock options. The expected life, the average time an option grant is outstanding, and
forfeiture rates are estimated based on historical experience.
The following table summarizes the award transactions under the Plans for the year ended February
28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/SARs Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Life |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at March 1, 2008 |
|
|
1,441,731 |
|
|
$ |
15.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and SARs granted |
|
|
419,705 |
|
|
|
21.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and SARs exercised |
|
|
(203,445 |
) |
|
|
11.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and SARs canceled |
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
|
|
17.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at February 28, 2009 |
|
|
1,648,876 |
|
|
$ |
17.15 |
|
|
6.4 years |
|
$ |
210,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at
February 28, 2009 |
|
|
1,601,136 |
|
|
$ |
17.02 |
|
|
6.3 years |
|
$ |
210,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at February 28, 2009 |
|
|
1,211,720 |
|
|
$ |
15.57 |
|
|
5.6 years |
|
$ |
210,788 |
|
|
Partnership Plan
The Amended and Restated 1987 Partnership Plan (the Partnership Plan), a plan designed to increase
the ownership of Apogee stock by key employees, allowed participants selected by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors to defer earned incentive compensation through the purchase of
Apogee common stock. The purchased stock was then matched by an equal award of nonvested shares,
which vested over a predetermined period. The nonvested shares were recorded as unearned
compensation in the equity section of the balance sheet. In accordance with EITF 97-14, Accounting
for Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned are Held in a Rabbi Trust and Invested, the
deferred compensation in the form of the Companys stock was recorded at historical cost and
classified as common stock held in trust. Since the investments were all in Company stock, an
offsetting amount was recorded as deferred compensation obligations in the equity section of the
balance sheet. Common shares of 3,400,000 were authorized for issuance under the Partnership Plan.
As of February 28, 2009, 3,276,000 shares have been issued or committed under the Partnership Plan.
The Company expensed $0.3 million in each of fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 in conjunction with the
Partnership Plan. There are 68,628 shares available for issuance under the Partnership Plan as of
February 28, 2009.
This program was eliminated for fiscal 2006 and beyond, although vesting of restricted stock will
still occur according to the vesting period of the grants.
Executive Compensation Program
In fiscal 2006, the Company implemented an executive compensation program to provide for a greater
portion of total compensation to be delivered to key employees selected by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors through long-term incentives using performance shares and SARs.
Performance shares are issued at the beginning of each fiscal year in the form of nonvested share
awards. The number of shares issued at grant is equal to the target number of performance shares
and allows for the right to receive an additional number of shares based on meeting pre-determined
Company performance goals.
The following table summarizes the nonvested share award transactions, including performance
shares, under the Plans and the Partnership Plan for fiscal 2007, 2008 and 2009:
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at February 25, 2006 |
|
|
512,551 |
|
|
$ |
12.41 |
|
Granted* |
|
|
207,472 |
|
|
|
15.75 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(46,044 |
) |
|
|
11.03 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(90,144 |
) |
|
|
13.83 |
|
|
Nonvested at March 3, 2007 |
|
|
583,835 |
|
|
$ |
13.48 |
|
Granted* |
|
|
242,538 |
|
|
|
23.96 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(46,026 |
) |
|
|
11.25 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(32,576 |
) |
|
|
17.02 |
|
|
Nonvested at March 1, 2008 |
|
|
747,771 |
|
|
$ |
15.66 |
|
Granted* |
|
|
262,248 |
|
|
|
18.90 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(299,398 |
) |
|
|
13.91 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(15,919 |
) |
|
|
23.49 |
|
|
Nonvested at February 28, 2009** |
|
|
694,702 |
|
|
$ |
17.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes 185,634, 125,294 and 148,172 for performance shares granted at target in fiscal 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively. |
|
** |
|
Includes a total of 410,575 of performance shares granted and outstanding at target for fiscal 2007, 2008 and
2009. |
At February 28, 2009, there was $1.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested share awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 22 months. The total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2009 was $6.3 million.
13 Income Taxes
The components of income tax expense for continuing operations for each of the last three fiscal
years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
16,642 |
|
|
$ |
18,802 |
|
|
$ |
17,550 |
|
State and local |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
Total current for continuing operations |
|
$ |
17,783 |
|
|
$ |
20,020 |
|
|
$ |
18,547 |
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
8,030 |
|
|
$ |
(2,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,350 |
) |
State and local |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
Total deferred for continuing operations |
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
|
$ |
(2,598 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,400 |
) |
|
Total non-current tax expense |
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
27,511 |
|
|
$ |
19,132 |
|
|
$ |
17,147 |
|
|
Income tax payments, net of refunds, were $25.9 million, $17.1 million and $15.0 million in fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
49
The differences between the statutory federal income tax rates and consolidated effective tax rates
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Federal income tax expense at statutory rates |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Tax credits research & development |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Tax credits other |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Foreign sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Manufacturing deduction |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Meals and entertainment |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Incentive stock option compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Tax-exempt interest |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Tax reserves adjustments and benefits recognized |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense, continuing operations |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
The lower rate in fiscal 2008 is primarily due to tax benefits recorded for research and
development tax credits and the manufacturing deduction increase.
Excess tax benefits for deductions associated with the stock-based incentive plans amounted to $1.7
million, $2.6 million and $2.7 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These benefits
were added directly to additional paid-in capital and were not reflected in the determination of
income tax expense or benefit.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for continuing operations at February 28, 2009 and
March 1, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
(In thousands) |
|
Current |
|
Noncurrent |
|
Current |
|
Noncurrent |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
Other accruals |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
7,515 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
9,798 |
|
Restructuring reserve |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,325 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,457 |
) |
Investment in PPG Auto Glass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
Liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
4,538 |
|
Other |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
4,066 |
|
|
$ |
(4,254 |
) |
|
$ |
6,082 |
|
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
|
The Company has state net operating loss carryforwards with a tax effect of $2.3 million. A full
valuation allowance has been established for these net operating loss carryforwards due to the
uncertainty of the use of the tax benefit in future periods.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various U.S. state
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state and
local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to fiscal 2004. The Internal
Revenue Service has audited the Company through fiscal 2002. The Company is currently under
examination by the IRS for fiscal years 2004 through 2007.
At February 28, 2009, the total liability for unrecognized tax benefits is $15.6 million, including
$4.0 million for the possible payment of penalties and interest. Of this total liability, $5.3
million, if recognized, would decrease the continuing operations effective tax rate. The increase
over the $13.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits at March 1, 2008 is a result of liabilities
recorded related to build up and interest recorded on existing unrecognized tax benefits. The total
liability for unrecognized tax benefits at February 28, 2009 includes $4.9 million related to
discontinued operations, which includes $1.8 million for interest and penalties, and the entire
amount, if recognized,
would decrease the effective tax rate for discontinued operations. The remainder of the
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would decrease deferred income taxes.
50
Penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense
which is consistent with past practices. Related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, the
Company accrued penalties and interest of $0.7 million during fiscal 2009.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized
tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year |
|
$ |
10,186 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
Gross increases in tax positions for prior years |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
Gross decreases in tax positions for prior years |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Gross increases based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Gross decreases based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
Statute of limitations expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of year |
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
|
$ |
10,186 |
|
|
The total liability for unrecognized tax benefits is not expected to change materially during
fiscal 2010.
14 Discontinued Operations
During fiscal 2007, the Company announced its intention to discontinue the manufacturing of
automotive replacement glass products and also announced its decision to sell the remaining portion
of the Auto Glass segment that manufactured and sold original equipment manufacturer and
aftermarket replacement windshields for the recreational vehicle and bus markets. The Company
restated the consolidated financial statements to show the results of the Auto Glass segment in
discontinued operations. The Company completed the sale of certain assets related to the business
during the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Conclusion of the sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $5.8
million which is included in earnings from discontinued operations in the consolidated results of
operations.
In several transactions in fiscal years 1998 through 2000, the Company completed the sale of its
large-scale domestic curtainwall business, the sale of the Companys detention/security business
and its exit from international curtainwall operations. The remaining estimated cash expenditures
related to these discontinued operations are recorded as liabilities of discontinued operations,
and a majority of the remaining cash expenditures related to discontinued operations is expected to
be paid within the next three years. The majority of these liabilities relate to the international
curtainwall operations, including bonds outstanding, of which the precise degree of liability
related to these matters will not be known until they are settled within the U.K. courts. The
reserve for discontinued operations also covers other liability issues, consisting of warranty
issues relating to these and other international construction projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Condensed Statement of Operations from Discontinued Businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
11,119 |
|
|
$ |
26,903 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes (prior to gain on disposal) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
(Loss) earnings from operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Gain on disposal, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss ) earnings |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
|
$ |
5,381 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Summary Balance Sheets of Discontinued Businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
3,397 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
51
15 Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Total |
|
Fiscal 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
238,468 |
|
|
$ |
244,970 |
|
|
$ |
240,397 |
|
|
$ |
201,667 |
|
|
$ |
925,502 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
48,998 |
|
|
|
48,537 |
|
|
|
55,088 |
|
|
|
48,125 |
|
|
|
200,748 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
10,279 |
|
|
|
12,291 |
|
|
|
17,677 |
|
|
|
10,948 |
|
|
|
51,195 |
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
10,202 |
|
|
|
12,217 |
|
|
|
17,645 |
|
|
|
10,971 |
|
|
|
51,035 |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Net earnings |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
Fiscal 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
209,885 |
|
|
$ |
217,673 |
|
|
$ |
210,975 |
|
|
$ |
243,276 |
|
|
$ |
881,809 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
42,888 |
|
|
|
46,863 |
|
|
|
40,214 |
|
|
|
55,185 |
|
|
|
185,150 |
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
7,566 |
|
|
|
14,092 |
|
|
|
43,170 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
5,381 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
11,696 |
|
|
|
11,474 |
|
|
|
10,996 |
|
|
|
14,385 |
|
|
|
48,551 |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
16 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss
by the weighted average common shares outstanding, including the dilutive effects of stock options,
SARs and restricted stock. However, when the Company has a loss from continuing operations, diluted
earnings per share computations are computed using basic shares. The following table presents a
reconciliation of the share amounts used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share weighted common shares outstanding |
|
|
27,746 |
|
|
|
28,319 |
|
|
|
27,688 |
|
Weighted common shares assumed upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Unvested shares for deferred compensation plans |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share weighted common shares and potential
common shares outstanding |
|
|
28,181 |
|
|
|
29,054 |
|
|
|
28,246 |
|
|
Stock options excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per share because the exercise price was greater than the average
market price of common shares |
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
52
17 Business Segments Data
The Companys segments are aligned to match the markets they serve. They are Architectural Products
and Services (Architectural) and Large-Scale Optical Technologies (LSO). The Architectural segment
designs, engineers, fabricates, installs, maintains and renovates the walls of glass and windows
comprising the outside skin of commercial and institutional buildings. The LSO segment manufactures
value-added glass and acrylic products for the custom picture framing market and produces optical
thin film coatings for consumer electronics displays.
The following table presents certain data for our two segments, and consolidated data, for fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net Sales from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Architectural |
|
$ |
854,034 |
|
|
$ |
798,819 |
|
|
$ |
694,888 |
|
Large-scale optical |
|
|
71,476 |
|
|
|
82,993 |
|
|
|
84,082 |
|
Intersegment elimination |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
925,502 |
|
|
$ |
881,809 |
|
|
$ |
778,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Architectural |
|
$ |
64,693 |
|
|
$ |
53,549 |
|
|
$ |
40,323 |
|
Large-scale optical |
|
|
16,897 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
|
10,215 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
(2,813 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
77,655 |
|
|
$ |
66,459 |
|
|
$ |
47,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Architectural |
|
$ |
24,018 |
|
|
$ |
19,611 |
|
|
$ |
16,120 |
|
Large-scale optical |
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,307 |
|
|
$ |
22,776 |
|
|
$ |
18,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Architectural |
|
$ |
43,359 |
|
|
$ |
32,108 |
|
|
$ |
37,684 |
|
Large-scale optical |
|
|
8,189 |
|
|
|
19,103 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
55,184 |
|
|
$ |
55,208 |
|
|
$ |
39,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Architectural |
|
$ |
389,819 |
|
|
$ |
417,092 |
|
|
$ |
329,589 |
|
Large-scale optical |
|
|
72,990 |
|
|
|
70,738 |
|
|
|
47,138 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
64,875 |
|
|
|
75,678 |
|
|
|
72,434 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
527,684 |
|
|
$ |
563,508 |
|
|
$ |
449,161 |
|
|
Due to the varying combinations of individual window systems and curtainwall, the Company has
determined that it is impractical to report product and service revenues generated by the
Architectural segment by class of product, beyond the segment revenues currently reported.
The Companys fiscal 2008 and 2007 investment in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture and the goodwill
associated with that investment of $25.2 million and $27.7 million, respectively, are included in
the identifiable assets for Corporate and other. The Company executed its right to sell its
minority interest in the PPG Auto Glass joint venture in fiscal 2009. Also included in the
identifiable assets for Corporate and other are the VRDN securities available for sale at corporate
and the marketable securities available for sale at the Companys wholly-owned insurance subsidiary
of $34.2 million in fiscal 2009, $21.8 million in fiscal 2008 and $19.1 million in fiscal 2007.
53
Apogees export net sales of $73.2 million, $71.4 million and $57.3 million for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively, were less than 10 percent of consolidated net sales each year. No single
customer, including government agencies, accounts for 10 percent or more of consolidated net sales.
Segment operating income is equal to net sales less cost of sales and operating expenses. Operating
income does not include provision for interest expense or income taxes. Corporate and other
includes miscellaneous corporate activity not allocable to business segments.
18 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Operating lease commitments. As of February 28, 2009, the Company was obligated under noncancelable
operating leases for buildings and equipment. Certain leases provide for increased rentals based
upon increases in real estate taxes or operating costs. Future minimum rental payments under
noncancelable operating leases are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Total minimum
payments |
|
$ |
6,946 |
|
|
$ |
5,761 |
|
|
$ |
4,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
$ |
25,390 |
|
Total rental expense was $20.9 million, $19.2 million and $18.5 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
At February 28, 2009, the Company has one sale and leaseback agreement for a building that provides
an option to purchase the building at projected future fair market value upon expiration of the
lease in 2014. The lease is classified as an operating lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases. The Company has a deferred gain of $0.6 million under this sale and
leaseback transaction, which is included in the balance sheet caption as accrued expenses and other
long-term liabilities. The average annual lease payment over the life of the remaining lease is
$0.4 million.
Bond commitments. In the ordinary course of business, predominantly in the Companys installation
business, the Company is required to obtain a surety or performance bond that commits payments to
its customers for any non-performance on its behalf. At February 28, 2009, $190.4 million of the
Companys backlog was bonded by performance bonds with a face value of $452.8 million. Performance
bonds do not have stated expiration dates, as the Company is released from the bonds upon
completion of the contract. With respect to the current portfolio of businesses, the Company has
never been required to pay on these performance-based bonds.
Guarantees and warranties. The Company accrues for warranty exposures and claim costs as a
percentage of sales based on historical trends. Actual warranty and claim costs are deducted from
the accrual when incurred. The Companys warranty and claim accruals are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Beginning warranty accrual |
|
$ |
4,617 |
|
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
Additional accruals |
|
|
8,073 |
|
|
|
6,099 |
|
Claims paid |
|
|
(7,617 |
) |
|
|
(5,806 |
) |
|
Ending warranty accrual |
|
$ |
5,073 |
|
|
$ |
4,617 |
|
|
Letters of credit. At February 28, 2009, the Company had ongoing letters of credit related to its
construction contracts and certain industrial development bonds. The total value of letters of
credit under which the Company was obligated as of February 28, 2009 was approximately $10.0
million. The Companys total availability under its $100.0 million credit facility is reduced by
borrowings under the facility and also by letters of credit issued under the facility. As of
February 28, 2009, $8.9 million of letters of credit had been issued under the facility.
Purchase obligations. The Company has purchase obligations for raw material commitments and capital
expenditures. At February 28, 2009, these obligations totaled $6.3 million.
Non-compete agreements. The Company has entered into a number of non-compete and consulting
agreements associated with current and former employees. As of February 28, 2009, future payments
of $0.8 million were committed under such agreements.
Litigation. The Company is a party to various legal proceedings incidental to its normal operating
activities. In particular, like others in the construction supply industry, the Companys
construction supply businesses are routinely involved in various disputes and claims arising out of
construction projects, sometimes involving significant
54
monetary
damages or product replacement. The Company is subject to litigation arising out of employment
practices, workers compensation, general liability and automobile claims. Although it is very
difficult to accurately predict the outcome of such proceedings, facts currently available indicate
that no such claims will result in losses that would have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of the Company.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by
this report (the Evaluation Date), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with
the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i)
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules
and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The report of
management required under this Item 9A is contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
under the caption Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The attestation report
required under this Item 9A is contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the
caption Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in
our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report that
would have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct which applies to all of our employees and
directors. The Code of Business Ethics and Conduct is published on our website at www.apog.com. Any
amendments to the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct and waivers of the Code of Business Ethics
and Conduct for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will be published on our
website.
The other information required by this item, other than the information set forth in Part I above
under the heading Executive Officers of the Registrant, is set forth under the headings Proposal
1: Election of Directors, Corporate Governance Procedures for Shareholder Recommendations or
Nominations of Director Candidates, Corporate Governance Board Committees, Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and Corporate Governance Audit Committee in the
Proxy Statement for the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 24, 2009, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after our fiscal
year-end. This information is incorporated herein by reference.
55
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item is set forth under the headings Executive Compensation and
Non-Employee Director Compensation in the Proxy Statement for the Companys Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on June 24, 2009, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after our fiscal year-end. This information is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS |
The information required by this item is set forth under the headings Proposal 2: Approval of the
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan Equity Compensation Plan Information,
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Security Ownership of Management in the
Proxy Statement for the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 24, 2009, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after our fiscal
year-end. This information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item is set forth under the heading Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions and Corporate Governance Board Independence in the Proxy Statement for
the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 24, 2009, which will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after our fiscal year-end. This information
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item is set forth under the headings Audit Committee Report and
Payment of Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees,
Tax Fees and All Other Fees and Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and
Permissible Non-Audit Services Provided by Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in
the Proxy Statement for the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 24, 2009,
which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after our fiscal
year-end. This information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
a) |
|
List of documents filed as a part of this report: |
|
1. |
|
Financial Statements The consolidated financial statements of the Company are set
forth in Item 8 of Part II of this report. |
|
|
2. |
|
Financial Statement Schedules Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
Deductions |
|
at End |
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
Costs and |
|
from |
|
of |
(In thousands) |
|
of Period |
Acquisition |
|
Expenses |
|
Reserves (1) |
|
Period |
|
Allowances for doubtful receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended Feb. 28, 2009
|
|
$ |
1,743 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,353 |
|
|
$ |
2,074 |
|
For the year ended March 1, 2008
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
284
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
For the year ended March 3, 2007
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted because they are not applicable or
the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. |
|
|
3. |
|
Exhibits See Item (b) below. |
56
|
b) |
|
Exhibits marked with an asterisk (*) identify each management contract or compensatory plan
or arrangement. Exhibits marked with a pound sign (#) are filed herewith. The remainder of the
exhibits have heretofore been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year-ended February 28, 2004. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Apogee Enterprises, Inc., as
amended through January 24, 2006. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen certificate for shares of common stock of Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4A to
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 2, 2002. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated November 12, 2001,
between Registrant and The Bank of New York. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrants Form 8-A/A filed on
November 30, 2001. |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit A of Registrants proxy statement for the 1997
Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed on May 16, 1997. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Resignation Agreement between Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and
James L. Martineau. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended November 28, 1998. |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Executive Supplemental Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November
28, 1998. |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Officers Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (2005 Restatement), First Amendment of Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (2005 Restatement) and Second Amendment of Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (2005 Restatement). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed January
29, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Third Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Officers
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (2005 Restatement).
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 15, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Form of Change In Control Severance Agreement between the
Registrant and certain senior executive officers of the
Registrant. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 4,
2008. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 10, 1998 between
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. and CompuDyne Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 12, 1998. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and CH
Holdings, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 23,
1999. |
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (2005 Restatement). Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
First Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (2005
Restatement). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4,
2009. |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Contribution and Assumption Agreement dated June 13, 2000,
among PPG Industries, Inc., the Registrant, certain
subsidiaries of the Company and PPG Auto Glass, LLC.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Limited Liability Company Agreement dated June 13, 2000,
between PPG Industries, Inc. and the Registrant. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2000. |
|
|
|
10.13*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Omnibus
Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
June 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive
Management Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
10.15*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(Amended and Restated Effective as of May 1, 2003).
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended February 28,
2004. |
57
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
10.16*
|
|
First Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of May
1, 2003). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4,
2009. |
|
|
|
10.17*
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement under the Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.18*
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement (2005) under the Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.19*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Non-Employee Director Charitable
Matching Contribution Program. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year-ended February 26, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, between Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. and banks party to the agreement, including
related contribution and subsidiary guaranty agreements.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.21*
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement under the
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2005. |
|
|
|
10.22*
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement (2006) under the Apogee
Enterprises, Inc. 2002 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended February 25,
2006. |
|
|
|
10.23*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan
(2005 Restatement). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October
17, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.24*
|
|
First Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred Incentive
Compensation Plan (2005 Restatement). Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on October 15, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.25*
|
|
Second Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Deferred
Incentive Compensation Plan (2005 Restatement). Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2009. |
|
|
|
10.26*
|
|
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Partnership Plan (2005 Restatement).
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.27*
|
|
First Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Partnership Plan
(2005 Restatement). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October
15, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.28*
|
|
Second Amendment of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Partnership Plan
(2005 Restatement). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4,
2009. |
|
10.29
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 14, 2006, to Credit
Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, among Apogee Enterprises,
Inc. and banks party to the agreement, including related
contribution and subsidiary guaranty agreements. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.30*
|
|
Resignation Agreement by and between Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
and Michael B. Clauer effective as of November 20, 2006.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.31*
|
|
Bonus Award Agreement between the Registrant and Russell
Huffer dated as of May 1, 2007. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year-ended March 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.32*
|
|
Bonus Award Agreement between the Registrant and Russell
Huffer dated as of April 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.25 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year-ended March 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.33*
|
|
Bonus Award Agreement between the Registrant and James S.
Porter dated as of April 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.26 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year-ended March 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.34*
|
|
Bonus Award Agreement between the Registrant and Patricia A.
Beithon dated as of April 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.27 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year-ended March 1, 2008. |
58
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
10.35*
|
|
Form of Change In Control Severance Agreement between the
Registrant and Gregory A. Silvestri effective as of May 5,
2008. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 8, 2008. |
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 18, 2008, to Credit
Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2005, among the Registrant and
banks party to the agreement, including related contribution
and subsidiary guaranty agreements. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on December 23, 2008. |
21#
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
23#
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
|
|
31.1#
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to rule
13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2#
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to rule
13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32.1#
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2#
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on April 29, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Russell Huffer
|
|
|
|
Russell Huffer |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on April
29, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Signature |
|
Title |
/s/ Russell Huffer
|
|
Chairman, President,
CEO and Director
(Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
/s/ James S. Porter
|
|
CFO (Principal
Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Huffer
|
|
|
|
James S. Porter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bernard P. Aldrich
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Marzec
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard P. Aldrich
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Marzec |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerome L. Davis
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ Stephen C. Mitchell
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerome L. Davis
|
|
|
|
Stephen C. Mitchell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sara L. Hays
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ Richard V. Reynolds
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sara L. Hays
|
|
|
|
Richard V. Reynolds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John T. Manning
|
|
Director
|
|
/s/ David E. Weiss
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John T. Manning
|
|
|
|
David E. Weiss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James L. Martineau
James L. Martineau
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
60