FORM 10-K Annual Report December 31 2012

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549 


FORM 10-K


  X . ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2012


      . TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to _______


Commission File Number 000-32865

 

WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

[f10k123112_10k001.jpg]

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada

 

88-0422023

(State of incorporation)

  

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

1130 West Pender St., Suite 230

Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 4A4

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(604) 257-3660

(Registrant’s telephone number)


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes      . No  X .

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes      . No  X .


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X . No      .


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes      . No  X .


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.      .


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer

      .

Accelerated filer

      .

Non-accelerated filer

      . (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

  X .


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  

Yes      . No  X .


The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2012 was $7,759,779 based upon the price ($0.105) at which the common stock was last sold as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter, multiplied by the approximate number of shares of common stock held by persons other than executive officers, directors and five percent stockholders of the registrant without conceding that any such person is an “affiliate” of the registrant for purposes of the federal securities laws. Our common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “WLGC.OB”


As of April 2, 2013, there were 83,276,717 shares of the registrant’s $0.001 par value common stock issued and 83,045,177 shares outstanding.


Documents incorporated by reference: None





TABLE OF CONTENTS


  

 

Page

  

PART I

 

  

  

 

Item 1

Business

4

Item 1A

Risk Factors

10

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

10

Item 2

Properties

10

Item 3

Legal Proceedings

10

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

11

  

  

 

  

PART II

 

  

  

 

Item 5

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

12

Item 6

Selected Financial Data

13

Item 7

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

13

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

16

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

F-1

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

17

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

17

Item 9B

Other Information

18

  

  

 

  

PART III

 

  

  

 

Item 10

Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

19

Item 11

Executive Compensation

22

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

25

Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

26

Item 14

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

27

  

  

 

  

PART IV

 

  

  

 

Item 15

Exhibits

29

 

  

 




2




FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. These risks and uncertainties include the following:


·

The availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements;


·

Economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;


·

Changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in our industry;


·

Actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties including our competitors, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities;


·

Competition in our industry;


·

The loss of or failure to obtain any license or permit necessary or desirable in the operation of our business;


·

Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;


·

The availability of additional capital to support capital improvements and development; and


·

Other risks identified in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the SEC.

 

This report should be read completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


Use of Term

 

Except as otherwise indicated by the context hereof, references in this report to “Company,” “WLGC,” “we,” “us” and “our” are references to WordLogic Corporation.  All references to “USD” or United States Dollars refer to the legal currency of the United States of America.



3



PART I


ITEM 1.  BUSINESS


Business Overview


We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 30, 1999 under the original name of The AmericanWest.com, Inc.  Pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated as of March 11, 2003, we merged with and acquired the assets of WordLogic Corporation, a Delaware corporation.  In anticipation of the closing of the merger, we changed our name to WordLogic Corporation.  WordLogic Corporation, the public Nevada company, was the surviving corporation after the merger.


We are a software company that develops, markets, licenses and sells advanced predictive text solutions designed to accelerate the entry and retrieval of text and information for personal computing devices ranging from small handheld Mobile Devices with touch screen and QWERTY keyboards to desktop computers and tablet PCs.  As efficient text input becomes more important due to the rapid expansion of data such as SMS, email, social networking, and search, the Company seeks to provide a natural input method that could reduce finger movements by over 50%, supply accurate multiple word predictions in just a gesture or two, and help users to control their input and enhance their communication.  The Company's Intelligent Input Platform and iKnowU keyboard application represent a new method for text input that is not solely focused on typing or speaking with speed and accuracy. Rather, as people input, search, text, email, and compose, the Company seeks to help individuals communicate and control their message, enhancing both accuracy and semantics in order to help users create meaning.


Business Development  


On January 9, 2007, we developed a new text entry/text messaging input solution for cell phones utilizing our patent pending prediction engine.  This new solution for cell phones is more efficient, user friendly and provides a more compelling text entry interface for users than our existing solutions.  In addition, the functionality and configuration of the technology can be expanded and/or modified to suit a user's or manufacturers' specific needs.


On March 15, 2007, we entered into a worldwide non-exclusive license with Cre8txt Limited of Bolton, United Kingdom.  Cre8txt has developed a keyboard which utilizes the skills of people who already use SMS (Short Message Service) texting on mobile phones.  Texting has become popular in Europe, North America and Asia.  Text message specific abbreviations have been developed which allow certain, experienced users to actually type text faster using a numerical keyboard layout rather than using a traditional computer QWERTY keyboard.  The Cre8txt keyboard is similar to a mobile phone keypad, and will utilize the WordLogic(TM) predictive text technology.  The WordLogic Prediction Engine is a powerful software tool which will predict text selected from a database of frequently used words, and will also be capable of translating SMS Text language into full text.  On July 5, 2007, we delivered the first 1,000 units of our software to Cre8txt Limited of Bolton, UK.


In March 2011, a new finger touchscreen prototype of the Company's WordLogic Predictive Keyboard was nominated for a CTIA Wireless 2011 Emerging Technology Award. The CTIA E-Tech Award category covers new or yet-to-be introduced products that enhance productivity and organization.


In February 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with RPX Corporation (“RPX”), for RPX to license the Company’s advanced predictive input software patents.  Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received a $5 million non-dilutive cash payment, while retaining full ownership of its patent portfolio.  RPX Corporation is a provider of patent risk solutions, offering defensive buying, acquisition syndication, patent intelligence and advisory services.  By acquiring patents, RPX helps to mitigate and manage patent risk for its growing client network.


In October 2012, the iKnowU keyboard application for Android powered devices was released. It leverages the Companys state-of-the-art patented technology, delivering the most advanced keyboard automation solution available.


In January 2013, the Company released its new predictive text solution, WordLogic for Business, allowing organizations to improve productivity through accurate, faster and more consistent text entry across the workforce.




4




Technology Overview


iKnowU 's award-winning keyboard is the most feature-rich and intuitive application for Android powered devices. We are the only keyboard provider that has the ability to predict entire phrases and sentences through their WordChunking technology, as well as offering the Companys Gesturing  capabilities.  This unique feature gives users the ability to enter words and phrases with sub-second input, resulting in rapid entry speeds with full accuracy.  Since October 2012, over 60,000 Android users have downloaded the application and are enjoying the most feature-rich, intelligent keyboard on the market. The application uniquely features:


[f10k123112_10k003.gif][f10k123112_10k005.gif]



[f10k123112_10k007.gif][f10k123112_10k009.gif]


[f10k123112_10k011.gif][f10k123112_10k013.gif]



The Company’s technology is unique in that it encompasses both the desk top PC and mobile device platforms. This patented technology can improve the way that mobile device users interact with their devices and open the door to new revenue streams as well as provide a competitive advantage against rival companies.



5




The Company also released the incredible power of its patented predictive text technology, WordLogic for Business, to the workplace in one cost-effective solution. With over ten years experience, the Company understands the need for enterprises to offer their workers the ability to rapidly and seamlessly enter industry or company-specific words and sentences into a multitude of devices from PC’s to mobile phones and tablets. WordLogic for Business is optimized to run on Android tablets and smartphones as well as desktop PCs. It can also be used with custom touchscreen devices, such as touchscreen PDAs used by couriers and delivery companies. WordLogic for Business automatically syncs across all devices currently in use and delivers a consistent, high-quality experience for the end-user, irrespective of the device or platform they are using. Companies seeking to adopt predictive text can build WordLogic for Business into their existing IT infrastructure using WordLogic's simple SDK.


Intellectual Property

 

We own the copyright of all of the content of our website, www.WordLogic.com.

 

On October 21, 2003 we received trademark approval for the mark “WordLogic” under Reg. No. 2,774,468 pending in the United States. A similar trademark application has been approved and registered in Canada under TMA576,700.


Our intellectual property portfolio includes six issued U.S. and European patents and five pending U.S. patent applications, one of which has received a Notice of Allowability from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).


In conjunction with its wholly owned subsidiary, 602531 British Columbia Ltd., the Company holds U.S. patents 7,293,231, 7,681,124, 7,716,579, and 7,921,361, which relate to data entry for personal computing devices. U.S. patent 7,293,231, which the Company believes to be one of its pioneering patents, relates to various methods, systems, devices, and computer-readable media for use in connection with computer-assisted data entry.


Equivalent foreign patents include EP 1171813 (WO 0057265), published under the Patent Cooperation Treaty and accepted by the European Patent Office. EP 1171813 is also accepted in Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Finland, Spain, the Netherlands, and Portugal. Additionally, a patent for a data entry method and system for personal computer and corresponding computer-readable medium is published by the World Intellectual Property Organization as WO 0233527 and by the European Patent Office as EP 1356368.


In addition, the Company has five U.S. patent applications filed in connection with its U.S. patent 7,293,231 related to various aspects of computer-assisted data entry. These entail three divisional patent applications (#11/133,779, #11/134,759, and #11/134,810) and two continuation applications (#11/871,900 and #11/871,904). These applications are also in the name of the Company's subsidiary 602531 British Columbia.


For the Company's pending applications, the USPTO has recently issued a Notice of Allowability for application #11/871,900 related to keyboard prediction and search utilizing gesturing software technology.


On February 12, 2013 we received trademark notice of allowance for the mark “IknowU” under serial number 85678117 in the United States.


We will principally rely upon trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret and contract law to protect our proprietary rights.  We generally intend to enter into confidentiality agreements, “work-made-for-hire” contracts and intellectual property licenses with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, respectively, as part of our efforts to control access to and distribution of our products, content and other proprietary information.


Summary of the Company’s Patents and Patent Applications

 

 

 

 

 

ISSUED PATENTS

Issued Patent Number

Location

Issue Date

Description

1356368

Europe

Jan. 2008

Data Entry Method and System for Personal Computer, and Corresponding Computer Readable Medium

1171813

Europe

Mar. 2004

Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices

7,293,231

U.S.

Nov. 2007

Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices

7,681,124

U.S.

Mar. 2010

Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices

7,716,579

U.S.

May 2010

Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices

7,921,361

U.S.

April 2011

Data Entry for Personal Computing Devices




6





PATENT APPLICATIONS

Application Number

Location

Type

Recent USPTO Action

#11/133,779

U.S.

Divisional Patent Application

 

#11/134,759

U.S.

Divisional Patent Application

 

#11/134,810

U.S.

Divisional Patent Application

 

#11/871,900

U.S.

Continuation Application

Notice of Allowability

#11,871,904

U.S.

Continuation Application

 


A copy of our patents can be obtained from the USPTO web site located at www.uspto.gov or from our website located at www.WordLogic.com, which provides a direct link to the patents.


Product Availability


The Company released iKnowU to support Android-based devices, as Android became a market leader with a more than 75% share by the end of 2012 (Source: Business Insider 2012). The iKnowU is available to download from the Google Play store for $1.99, with a free time-limited trial version also available.


The Company also brings the incredible power of its patented predictive text technology, released its new predictive text solution, WordLogic for Business, allowing organizations to improve productivity through accurate, faster and more consistent text entry across the workforce. Organizations seeking to adopt predictive text can build WordLogic for Business into their existing IT infrastructure using WordLogic's simple Software Development Kits. WordLogic for Business is available worldwide to businesses of all sizes as either a fully-hosted service from WordLogic or installed and internally hosted on the customer's systems and is available in multiple languages.


Target Customers


The Company’s target customers will likely include Tier 1 wireless operators in the U.S. as well as smartphone original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). In the telecommunications industry, a Tier 1 wireless carrier entails a company that is the sole operator of its network, indicating that this provider offers a direct connection to the networks it uses to deliver voice and data as well as to the Internet. AT&T Inc. (T-NYSE), Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ-NYSE), Sprint Nextel Corp. (S-NYSE), and T-Mobile USA, Inc. are examples of Tier 1 operators. Conversely, Tier 2 companies may procure a portion of their networks from the Tier 1 carriers, and Tier 3 operators are wholly reliant on the networks of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 firms. In addition to targeting the Tier 1 carriers, the Company intends to market its technology to smartphone OEMs. Examples of smartphone OEMs include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., HTC Corp. (2498-TPE), Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. (MMI-NYSE), Nokia and LG Electronics Inc. Customers this size may have the potential to apply the Company’s technology in up to 200 million units annually. The Company will also be targeting its enterprise solution WordLogic for Business to individual corporations, as well as enterprise software manufacturers such as Oracle, Microsoft and SAP.


Marketing Strategy


The Company designed and implemented a new logo and website design in 2012. In October of 2012, the Company soft-launched its first Android product iKnowU on Google Play and created a specifically branded site iknowu.net. The Company started marketing campaigns and promotion of the iKnowU product via banner advertising campaigns on numerous mobile and internet portals.


The Company has engaged a marketing and public relations firms to disseminate the iKnowU - Wordlogic message to publishers worldwide.


Future retail-based marketing plans include customer email campaigns featuring corporate news and updated product information, external email marketing campaigns to attract new customers, and affiliate marketing.




7




Growth Strategy


In addition to further developing its current product offering, much of the Company’s strategy for growth going forward is based on its U.S. and European patents.  As well as leveraging its intellectual property, the Company seeks to increase emphasis on its predictive text platform, which the Company believes can offer predictive input with a broad range of Internet-enabled control and communication applications.  Other projects in development include expanding and enhancing the Company’s retail product offerings.  Ultimately, the Company believes that it may become an acquisition target for larger companies within the technology sector due to the breadth of its patent portfolio and the novel characteristics of its technology.


The Industry


Smartphones and mobile devices have become a necessity for many professional and non-professional individuals. Touchscreens, email, 3G, 4G, and power-packed mobile applications have resulted in considerable growth of new devices. To this extent, the Company estimates that nearly 75% of phones shipped in the U.S. contain either a QWERTY or touchscreen keyboard. Over 700 million smartphones were sold in 2012 and could see a 50% increase each year for the next few years to over a billion smartphone sales in 2013.


Likewise, the PC market represents billions of dollars of equipment that uses text input and millions of consumers who could benefit from refined input and search options. Although not double digit growth in 2013, 384 million desktop PCs, portable computers, and mini-notebooks are expected to ship to consumers, The Company may be of value to PC manufacturers that are seeking innovative advancements to the PC experience in order to remain competitive. Likewise, versions of the Company's technology can be incorporated into the growing number of tablet computers entering the marketplace (estimated at over 165 million for 2013).


Further, the information technology (IT) industry is experiencing several related trends: (1) rapid growth of mobile devices; (2) tablets gaining in popularity over netbooks; (3) smartphones becoming more advanced; (4) enterprise workers seeking to use their phones for both business and personal tasks; and (5) increasing developer activity online. Accordingly, there will likely be even greater emphasis on mobile apps going forward, particularly for tablets, and targeted toward enterprise. In many cases, large enterprises are expected to launch apps specific for their workforces, as these companies seek to reduce costs and leverage time and cost efficiencies (Source: The New Wave of App Development from TechNewsWorld , February 1, 2011).


Outsell, Inc., a research and advisory firm for the publishing and information industries, estimates that the global information industry is valued at $506 billion with strong gains coming from web search. The Company believes that there is considerable unmet need within this market for improved enterprise search tools and, consequently, an opportunity for our technology operating as either a front-end application or as a standalone product.


Competition


The Company believes that speed, ease of use, phrase prediction and a relatively small footprint are advantages of its technology that could further establish the Company as a provider of text input and manipulation software, particularly for mobile phones. However, as the demand for text-savvy phones accelerates, competition among text input solution providers is also increasing. Introducing technology and user interface enhancements is crucial to maintaining a competitive advantage.


Altogether, the predictive technology landscape is considered to be relatively competitive. Yet, within the refined search area, the Company believes that there are fewer competitors because although many developers would like to build better predictive text technologies, many do not possess the existing technology and code to do so.


We compete with companies such as SwiftKey and Nuance that offer keyboard solutions that are not as robust as the company offerings but have significant market share among handset manufacturers and carriers. In 2012, SwiftKey spent more days as Google Play’s No.1 paid download than any other app, validating the global market for better text input for mobile devices. As we increase marketing and the awareness of the iKnowU product we are poised to significantly capture our competitors clients and new customers.


Government Regulation


Because we sell products through the Internet, we may be subject to rules and regulations around the world, which will affect our business.  The laws and regulations that govern Internet commerce change rapidly.  Also, because we carry on business in Canada, we are subject to laws regarding employment, taxes and other regulatory issues for our Canadian operations.  The following laws and regulations applicable to Internet commerce and are relevant to our business:

 



8




Privacy Law.  The state of privacy law is unsettled, and rapidly changing.  Current and proposed federal, state and foreign privacy regulations and other laws restricting the collection, use and disclosure of personal information could limit our ability to use the information in our databases to generate revenues.  In late 1998, COPPA was enacted, mandating that measures be taken to safeguard minors under the age of 13.  The FTC promulgated regulations implementing COPPA on October 21, 1999, which became effective on April 21, 2000.  The principal COPPA requirement is that individually identifiable information about minors under the age of 13 not be collected, used or displayed without first obtaining informed parental consent that is verifiable in light of present technology.

 

The FTC final regulations create a “sliding scale” of permissible methods for obtaining such consent.  Consent for internal use of the individually identifiable information of children under the age of 13 can be obtained through e-mail plus an additional safeguard, such as confirming consent with a delayed e-mail, telephone call, or letter.  Obtaining verifiable consent from a child’s parent to share that child’s information with a third party or enable the child to publicly distribute the information by, for example, allowing unrestricted access to a chat room or message board is significantly more burdensome.  While the temporary “sliding scale implementation was due to expire on April 21, 2002, on October 31, 2001, the FTC extended the implementation period through April 21, 2005.  On April 21, 2005, the “sliding scale” mechanism was extended indefinitely.

 

The FTC has required that parental consent for such higher risk activities be verified by more secure methods than e-mail, such as a credit card in connection with a transaction, print-and-sign forms, toll-free numbers staffed by trained operators, or digital signatures.  Complying with the new requirements is costly and may dissuade some of our customers from using our products.  While we will attempt to be fully compliant with the FTC requirements, our efforts may not be entirely successful.  In addition, at times, we rely upon outside vendors to maintain data-collection software, and there can be no assurance that they will at all times comply with our instructions to comply with COPPA.  If our methods of complying with COPPA are inadequate, we may face litigation with the FTC or individuals, which would adversely affect our business.

 

Moreover, we have posted a privacy policy pertaining to all users and visitors to our web site.  By doing so, we will subject ourselves to the jurisdiction of the FTC.  Should any of our business practices be found to differ from our privacy policy, we could be subject to sanctions and penalties from the FTC.  It is also possible that users or visitors could try to recover damages in a civil action as well.

 

The European Union recently enacted its own privacy regulations that may result in limits on the collection and use of certain user information.  The laws governing the Internet, however, remain largely unsettled, even in areas where there has been some legislative action.  It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws such as those governing intellectual property, privacy, libel and commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws, both in the United States and abroad, that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business on the Internet.  Furthermore, the Federal Trade Commission has recently investigated the disclosure of personal identifying information obtained from individuals by Internet companies.  Evolving areas of law that are relevant to our business include privacy law, regulation on what websites contain, and sales and use tax.  Because of this rapidly evolving and uncertain regulatory environment, we cannot predict how these laws and regulations might affect our business.  In addition, these uncertainties make it difficult to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations governing the Internet.  These laws and regulations could harm us by subjecting us to liability or forcing us to change how we do business.


Conformance to E-Commerce Statutory Requirements for Formation of Contracts. We intend to conduct e-commerce on our web site, and through affiliated web sites.  The applicable law on online formation of contracts has been unsettled and is evolving.  On June 30, 2000, the federal government enacted the “E-Sign” statute, which in limited cases permits online formation of contracts.  Similarly, on January 1, 2000, California adopted a standard version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), which also permits electronic signatures and record-keeping for certain types of contracts.  We attempt to comply with these laws, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful.  Judicial interpretation of the applicability of these laws could result in customer contracts being set aside or modified.  In that case, our e-commerce revenue could be materially adversely affected.


Sales Tax.  The tax treatment of goods sold over the Internet is currently unsettled.  A number of proposals have been made at the state and local level that would impose additional taxes on the sale of goods through the Internet.  Such proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair the growth of electronic commerce and could adversely affect our opportunity to derive financial benefit from electronic commerce.  While the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) has placed a moratorium on new state and local taxes on Internet commerce, the tax moratorium expired on November 1, 2003, and has not been re-enacted.  On November 1, 2007, the "Internet Tax Freedom Act Amendment Acts of 2007" was signed into law.  It extends the prohibitions against multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce until November 1, 2014. 




9




WHERE YOU CAN GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.  You may read and copy our reports or other filings made with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549.  You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  You can also access these reports and other filings electronically on the SEC’s web site, www.sec.gov.


ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS


We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.


ITEM 1B.   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None.


ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES


On June 23, 2010, we entered into a lease agreement for office space located at 1130 West Pender St., Suite 230, Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 4A4. Since that time, we have not sought to move or change our office site.  Our telephone number remains (604) 257-3600. Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $6,954 CAD per month on a month-to-month basis for 2113ft of corporate office space. The space we lease is utilized for general main office purposes.


On June 15, 2012, we also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 175 Varick Street, Office number 345, New York, NY 10014 U.S.A. Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $1,400 USD per month on a month-to-month basis for 80ft of corporate office space. The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes.


On July 10, 2012, we also entered into a lease agreement for new office space located at 3820 Cessna Drive, Suite 190, Richmond, BC Canada V7B 0A2. Under the lease, we currently pay a total of $2,172 CAD per month on a month-to-month basis for 934ft of corporate office space. The space we lease is utilized for general office purposes. Additional space may be required as we expand our operations. We do not foresee any significant difficulties in obtaining any required additional space. We do not own any real estate.


ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


In January, 2011, Mr. Knaven, a former officer and director of the Company, commenced a complaint to British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch against the Company (the “ESB Complaint”) alleging that he was owed unpaid wages.  In October, 2011, Mr. Knaven initiated two further legal proceedings against the Company in B.C. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court Actions”), in which he advanced further complaints in respect of claims for shares and interest, a claim for wrongful dismissal, and further claims for general and unspecified damages.


Regarding the ESB Complaint, on October 24, 2012 the Company applied successfully for a ruling placing that complaint in abeyance, to be dealt with by the B.C. Supreme Court rather than the ESB.  In accordance with that ruling, Mr. Knaven on November 9, 2011 delivered a proposed amendment to one of the Supreme Court Actions.  The quantified portion of Mr. Knaven’s claims totals approximately $261,752. He also seeks general and unspecified damages which are unquantified.


The Company vigorously contests the claims, and has filed Responses and Counterclaims regarding all of the above referenced disputes.  The Counterclaims name Mr. Knaven and others as defendants by counterclaim. Mr. Knaven has been served and has filed Responses disputing and denying the Counterclaims.  


The other defendants by counterclaim have not yet been served.  They include Mr. Mike Flom who appears to have been involved in assisting Mr. Knaven in formulating and advancing Knaven’s various claims against the Company.  In addition, although Mr. Flom has neither threatened nor served any legal proceedings of his own, Mr. Flom had, during 2012, asserted that the Company owed him a “termination” payment and related sums totaling in excess of $500,000, and the issuance of shares.  The Company has put Mr. Flom on notice that it does not accept those assertions.



10




In October, 2012, Biller Communications (“Biller”), a former consulting firm of the Company, commenced a complaint to Supreme Court of the State of New York against the Company alleging that the Company owes Biller $30,456, pursuant to a contract. The Company vigorously contests that the Company owes Biller any money. The Company filed a Verified Answer raising numerous defenses and Discovery Demands upon the attorneys for Biller.


Subsequent to December 31, 2012, the Company received notice from the former Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), threatening a “whistle blower” claim pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank legislation, to be commenced in the State of New York, alleging he was forced to resign because he was investigating expenses incurred by the Chief Executive Officer.  The Company denies the allegations, and further maintains the matter is to be resolved by arbitration. Accordingly it has commenced arbitration in British Columbia, Canada to resolve the issues. The Company also appointed an independent director to conduct an investigation into the allegations raised by the former COO to report to the Board of Directors on the outcome of his investigation, together with recommendations. The report was delivered to the Board of Directors on March 13, 2013.    


On April 2, 2013, a complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Paul Silverstein against the Company in regards to certain claims asserted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by Mr. Silverstein related to allegations of fraud and the termination of Mr. Silverstein as President and CEO of the Corporation. The Corporation has not yet responded to the claims and the complaint is in the initial stages.


The outcome of above litigations and possible litigation cannot be reliably predicted at this time, nor can the Company provide a timeline for resolution.


ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not Applicable.





11




PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Common Stock


Our Common Stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB).  Our Common Stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board trading under the symbol “WLGC.OB” since April 14, 2003.  Because we are quoted on the OTCBB, our securities may be less liquid, receive less coverage by security analysts and news media, and generate lower prices than might otherwise be obtained if they were listed on a national securities exchange.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for our Common Stock per quarter as reported by the OTCBB for the period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, based on our fiscal year end December 31. These prices represent quotations between dealers without adjustment for retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

2012 – High

 

$0.20

 

 

 

$0.13

 

 

 


$0.1199

 

 


$0.11

2012 – Low

 

$0.091

 

 

 

$0.101

 

 

 


$0.09

 

 


$0.0687

2011 – High

 

$0.36

 

 

 

$0.28

 

 

 


$0.21

 

 


$0.15

2011 – Low

 

$0.12

 

 

 

$0.15

 

 

 


$0.10

 

 


$0.08


Record Holders


As of April 2, 2013, an aggregate of 83,276,717 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding and were owned by approximately 110 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


None. 


Re-Purchase and Retirement of Equity Securities


See Note 12 – Treasury Stock of the Notes to Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for information regarding share repurchases and retirement of treasury stock. The following is our monthly stock repurchases for the fiscal year 2012:


Period

 

Total number of Shares Purchased

 

 

Average Price Paid per Share

August 1, 2012 – August 31, 2012

 

99,000

 

$

0.0961

September 1, 2012 – September 31, 2012

 

333,000

 

$

0.1007

October 1, 2012 – October 31, 2012

 

370,140

 

$

0.1036

November 1, 2012 – November 30, 2012

 

229,400

 

$

0.0874

December 10, 2012, retirement of treasury stock

 

(800,000)

 

$

-


The repurchases were made using cash resources and occurred in the open market and pursuant to a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




12




Dividends


We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock since inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business and that no dividends on our Common Stock will be declared in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and other pertinent facts.  Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on our Common Stock will be paid in the future.


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

On May 14, 2010, the Company registered on Form S-8 the 2010 Share Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to ten million (10,000,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.


On July 30, 2012, the Company registered on Form S-8 the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to ten million (10,000,000) shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.



ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.


ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections.  We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted.  You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.  The forward-looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report.  We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Working Capital


  

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Current Assets

$1,758,735

$52,979

Current Liabilities

$487,972

$686,878

Working Capital (deficit)

$ 1,270,763

(633,899)


Cash Flows

 

 

 

  

December 31, 2012

December 31, 2011

Cash Flows from (used in) Operating Activities

$1,835,245

$(917,798)

Cash Flows from (used in) Investing Activities

$(936,123)

$nil

Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities

$(137,408)

$848,238

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

$(31,200)

8,395

Net Increase (decrease) in Cash During Period

$730,514

$(61,165)




13




Operating Revenues


Operating revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 were $5,000,991 and is comprised of product sales of $991 and license granting of $5,000,000.


Operating revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 were $4,076 and is comprised of product sales totaling $4,076.


Operating Expenses and Net Loss


Operating expenses for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2012 were $3,640,436 and is comprised of $119,864 in rent, $3,121,636 in selling, general and administrative and $398,936 in research and development. Operating expenses for the same period ended December 31, 2011 were $1,987,410 and is comprised of $71,164 in rent, $1,556,967 in selling, general and administrative and $359,279 in research and development.


Net income for the twelve months period ended December 31, 2012 was $1,380,832 and is comprised of $1,360,555 income from operations, $6,992 in interest income, $2,113 in interest expense, $2,947 in gain on interest forgiveness, and $12,451 in gain on settled payable.  Net loss for the same period ended December 31, 2011 was $2,132,373 and is comprised of $1,983,334 loss from operations, $11,250 bad debts, $7,689 in interest expense and $130,100 loss on settlement of debt.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


As at December 31, 2012, the Company’s cash and current asset balance was $1,758,735 compared to $52,979 as at December 31, 2011. The increase in current assets of $1,705,756 is attributed to an increase of $566,818 in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $163,696 in restricted cash, an increase of $915,077 in investments, an increase of $17,884 in GST/HST refund receivable, an increase of $5 in employee advances, an increase of $515 in interest receivable, and an increase in prepaid expenses of $47,761.

 

As at December 31, 2012, the Company had current and total liabilities of $487,972 compared with current and total liabilities of $686,878 as at December 31, 2011. The decrease in total liabilities of $198,906 is attributed to a $30,532 decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a decrease of $38,074 in bank loans payable, a decrease of $121,894 in indebtedness to related parties, a decrease of $6,000 in notes payable, and a decrease of $2,406 in accrued interest.


As at December 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital of $1,270,763 compared with a working capital deficit of $633,899 as at December 31, 2011.  The increase in working capital was primarily attributed to an increase in investments and a reduction in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.


Cashflow from Operating Activities


During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company generated $1,835,245 of cash for operating activities compared to the use of $917,798 of cash for operating activities during the same period ended December 31, 2011. The change in net cash generated in operating activities is primarily attributed to an increase in revenue from patents licensing. 


Cashflow from Investing Activities


During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company used $936,123 of cash for investing activities compared to $nil of cash for investing activities during the same period ended December 31, 2011. The change in net cash used in investing activities is primarily attributed to purchase of equipment and investments in term deposits. 


Cashflow from Financing Activities


During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company used $137,408 of cash from financing activities compared to cash received $848,238 for the same period ended December 31, 2011.  The change in cash flows from financing activities is primarily attributed to an increase in repayment of related party advances, repayment of line of credit, and other promissory notes, net of decrease in sale of common shares.



14




Going Concern


We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive acquisitions and activities. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.


Future Financings


We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our operations and other activities.


Critical Accounting Policies


Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

 

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in the notes to our financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements


In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.



15




In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.


In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The guidance in ASU 2011-08 is intended to reduce complexity and costs by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. The amendments also improve previous guidance by expanding upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Also, the amendments improve the examples of events and circumstances that an entity having a reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount should consider in determining whether to measure an impairment loss, if any, under the second step of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.


In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-05 will become effective for the Company on December 1, 2012. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, items of other comprehensive income that are reclassified to profit or loss are required to be presented separately on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring that such amounts be presented either in a single continuous statement of income and comprehensive income or separately in consecutive statements of income and comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. Additional disclosure requirements in the update include: (1) for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs; (2) for an entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset that is different from the asset’s highest and best use, the reason for the difference; (3) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were determined; and (4) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. ASU 2011-04 will become effective for the Company on December 1, 2012. We are currently evaluating ASU 2011-04 and have not yet determined the impact that adoption will have on our financial statements.


In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”. This amendment explains which modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”). Under the new guidance, the definition of a troubled debt restructuring remains essentially unchanged, and for a loan modification to be considered a TDR, certain basic criteria must still be met. For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructuring occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. ASU 2011-02 has become effective for the Company on September 1, 2012. The Company does not believe that the guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.


The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.




16




ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA






WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)


For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011






 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit

F-6

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-12





F-1




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors

WordLogic Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of WordLogic Corporation (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the twelve month periods then ended.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.


We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WordLogic Corporation (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods described above in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses prior to the current period, has used significant cash in support of its operating activities and, based upon current operating levels, requires additional capital or significant reconfiguration of its operations to sustain its operations for the foreseeable future, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 10, 2013




F-2




WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Expressed in US Dollars)


 

 

December 31,

2012

 

December 31,

2011

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

581,605

$

 14,787

Restricted cash (Note 3)

 

174,561

 

 10,865

Investments (Note 4)

 

915,077

 

 –

GST/HST refund receivable (Note 6)

 

32,724

 

 14,840

Employee advances

 

 221

 

 216

Interest receivable (Note 4)

 

515

 

 –

Prepaid expenses (Note 5)

 

54,032

 

 12,271

 

 

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

 

1,758,735

 

 52,979

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (Note 7)

 

19,365

 

 1,896

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

$

1,778,100

$

 54,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

430,481

$

 461,013

Bank loans payable (Note 8)

 

 –

 

 38,074

Indebtedness to related parties (Note 9)

 

25,543

 

 147,437

Accrued interest

 

31,948

 

 34,354

Notes payable (Note 10)

 

 –

 

 6,000

 

 

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

487,972

 

 686,878

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

487,972

 

 686,878

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized 83,276,717 shares issued and 83,045,177 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2012, and 82,500,606 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011 (Note 11)

 

83,277

 

 82,501

Additional paid-in capital

 

23,524,244

 

 22,946,272

Stock receivable

 

  –

 

 (10,000)

Stock payable

 

4,000

 

  –

Accumulated deficit

 

 (2,264,854)

 

 (2,264,854)

Deficit accumulated during development stage

 

(19,379,130)

 

 (20,759,962)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(657,160)

 

 (625,960)

Treasury stock, 231,540 shares and nil as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (Note 12)

 

(20,249)

 

 –

 

 

 

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

1,290,128

 

 (632,003)

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

$

1,778,100

$

 54,875

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-3




WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Expressed in US Dollars)


 

 

Accumulated

from May 27,

2003 (Date of

Inception) to

For the Years Ended

 

 

December 31,

2012

 

December 31,

2012

 

December 31,

2011

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product sales

$

26,748

$

991

$

4,076

Patents licensing (Note 14)

 

 5,000,000

 

5,000,000

 

 –

Royalty revenue

 

 32,962

 

 –

 

 –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

5,059,710

 

5,000,991

 

4,076

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rent

 

 948,227

 

119,864

 

71,164

Selling, general and administrative (Note 9 and 13)

 

20,488,975

 

3,121,636

 

1,556,967

Research and development

 

3,324,673

 

398,936

 

359,279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

24,761,875

 

3,640,436

 

1,987,410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Operations

 

 (19,702,165)

 

1,360,555

 

(1,983,334)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expenses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bad debts

 

 (11,250)

 

 

(11,250)

Interest income

 

8,752

 

6,992

 

 –

Interest expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related parties

 

 (84,152)

 

 –

 

 –

Amortization of discount on convertible note

 

 (145,243)

 

 –

 

 –

Other notes, advances and amounts

 

 (445,371)

 

(2,113)

 

(7,689)

Gain on derivative liability

 

 142,861 

 

 –

 

 –

Gain on interest forgiveness

 

 2,947 

 

  2,947

 

 –

Gain (loss) on settled payables (Note 15)

 

 (745,509)

 

12,451

 

(130,100)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) Before Extraordinary Item

 

 (20,979,130)

 

1,380,832

 

(2,132,373)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net extraordinary gain on litigation settlement, less applicable income taxes of $nil

 

 1,600,000 

 

 –

 

 –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

 (19,379,130)

 

1,380,832

 

(2,132,373)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net Gain (Loss) of Foreign Currency Translation

 

 (657,160)

 

(31,200)

 

8,395

Net Comprehensive Income (Loss)

$

 (20,036,290)

$

1,349,632

$

(2,123,978)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share

 

 

$

0.02

$

(0.03)

Diluted net income (loss) per share

 

 

$

0.02

$

(0.03)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares used in calculating basic net income (loss) per share

 

 

 

83,726,680

 

72,623,959

Weighted average common shares used in calculating diluted net income (loss) per share

 

 

 

83,726,680

 

72,623,959


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-4




WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in US Dollars)


 

 

Accumulated

from May 27, 2003 (Date of Inception) to

 

For the Year Ended

 

 

December 31, 2012

(Unaudited)

 

December 31,

2012

 

December 31,

2011

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

(19,379,130)

$

1,380,832

$

(2,132,373)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided  (used) in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bad debts

 

11,250

 

 –

 

11,250

Depreciation and amortization

 

65,358

 

3,577

 

 667

Common stock issued for services and payables

 

1,050,425

 

64,333

 

938,635

Stock-based compensation

 

12,587,229

 

479,607

 

83,644

Amortization of debt discount

 

145,243

 

 –

 

 –

Loss (gain) on settled liabilities

 

807,202

 

(15,398)

 

130,100

Gain on derivative liability

 

(142,861)

 

 –

 

 –

Changes in current assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables

 

17,524

 

(18,399)

 

5,635

Employee advances

 

(15,589)

 

(5)

 

5

Prepaid expenses

 

(54,032)

 

(41,761)

 

276

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

655,799

 

(18,082)

 

58,359

Accrued interest payable

 

65,658

 

541

 

 (13,996)

Net cash provided (used) in operating activities

 

(4,185,924)

 

1,835,245

 

(917,798)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in term deposits

 

(915,077)

 

(915,077)

 

 –

Purchases of equipment

 

(47,988)

 

(21,046)

 

 –

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(963,065)

 

(936,123)

 

 –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from related party advances

 

1,328,499

 

10,373

 

(69,248)

Repayment of related party advances

 

(1,015,730)

 

(132,267)

 

  –

Proceeds from promissory notes issued to related parties

 

411,509

 

 –

 

  –

Repayment of related party promissory notes

 

(493,941)

 

 –

 

 –

Proceeds from convertible promissory note

 

933,926

 

 –

 

 –

Repayment of convertible promissory notes

 

(947,462)

 

 –

 

 –

Proceeds from other promissory note

 

993,120

 

 –

 

 17,000

Repayment of other promissory notes

 

(449,220)

 

(6,000)

 

 –

Payments on capital lease obligation

 

(12,071)

 

 –

 

 –

Proceeds from line of credit

 

60,659

 

 –

 

 17,058

Repayment of line of credit

 

(60,659)

 

(38,074)

 

(14,144)

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(101,440)

 

(101,440)

 

 –

Proceeds from stock options and warrants exercised

 

532,915

 

 –

 

 –

Proceeds from sale of common shares

 

5,380,680

 

130,000

 

897,572

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

6,560,785

 

(137,408)

 

848,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(657,160)

 

(31,200)

 

8,395

Net change in cash

 

754,636

 

730,514

 

(61,165)

Cash, beginning of period

 

1,530

 

25,652

 

86,817

Cash, end of period

$

756,166

$

756,166

$

25,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Cash Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Cashless exercise of warrants

$

275

$

 –

$

187

  Stock issued to settle notes payable plus accrued interest

$

1,445,853

$

 –

$

160,400

  Line of credit converted to bank loan

$

44,359

$

 –

$

 –

  Retirement of treasury stock

$

81,191

$

81,191

$

 –

  Reclass from common stock to stock payable

$

4,000

$

4,000

$

 –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

-

 

-

 

-

Cash paid for interest

$

215,044

$

2,113

$

5,298


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-5




WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(Expressed in US Dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deficit

Accumulated

Accumulated

 

 

Common Stock

Additional

Paid-In

Treasury Stock

Stock

Payable

Accumulated

During

Development

Other

Comprehensive

 

 

Shares

Par Value

Capital

Shares

Cost

(Receivable)

Deficit

Stage

Loss

Total

 

 

$

 

 

$

$

$

$

$

$

Balance, May 27, 2003 (inception), prior to reverse merger

19,016,657

19,017

1,504,366

(2,264,854)

3,806

(737,665)

Reverse merger with The American West.com, Inc. (Note 1)

2,907,007

2,907

(2,907)

Cancelled shares.

(60,000)

(60)

60

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(408,027)

(408,027)

Currency translation adjustment

(270,371)

(270,371)

Balance, December 31, 2003

21,863,664

21,864

1,501,519

(2,264,854)

(408,027)

(266,565)

(1,416,063)

Common stock issued in exchange for services and payables

88,000

88

47,369

47,457

Common stock options granted

10,344

10,344

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

938,596

938,596

Currency translation adjustment

(97,095)

(97,095)

Balance, December 31, 2004

21,951,664

21,952

1,559,232

(2,264,854)

530,569

(363,660)

(516,761)

Sale of common stock ($0.65/share)

830,770

830

539,170

540,000

Common stock options granted

204,458

204,458

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(1,221,564)

(1,221,564)

Currency translation adjustment

(2,930)

(2,930)

Balance, December 31, 2005

22,782,434

22,782

2,302,860

(2,264,854)

(690,995)

(366,590)

(996,797)

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.60/share)

570,000

570

341,430

342,000

Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)

100,000

100

29,900

30,000

Common stock options exercised ($0.60/share)

29,150

30

17,460

17,490

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share)

1,000,000

1,000

499,000

500,000

Common stock options and warrants vested

1,132,512

1,132,512

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(2,214,823)

(2,214,823)

Currency translation adjustment

4,940

4,940

Balance, December 31, 2006

24,481,584

24,482

4,323,162

(2,264,854)

(2,905,818)

(361,650)

(1,184,678)

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.65/share)

200,000

200

129,800

 –

130,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.50/share)

821,000

821

409,679

 –

410,500

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.40/share)

75,000

75

29,925

 –

30,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share)

2,377,297

2,377

710,812

 –

713,189


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-6




Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share)

40,000

40

9,960

 –

10,000

Exercise of warrants ($1.25/share)

20,000

20

24,980

 –

25,000

Common stock options exercised (cashless)

87,736

88

(88)

 –

Common stock options and warrants vested

439,393

 –

439,393

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(1,634,324)

 –

(1,634,324)

Currency translation adjustment

 (103,990)

(103,990)

Balance, December 31, 2007

28,102,617

28,103

6,077,623

(2,264,854)

(4,540,142)

 (465,640)

(1,164,910)

Sale of common stock ($0.351.00/share)

100,000

100

99,900

 –

100,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one–half warrant ($0.60/share)

800,000

800

479,200

 –

480,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one–half warrant ($1.00/share)

50,000

50

49,950

 –

50,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)

112,500

112

22,388

 –

22,500

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.25/share)

200,000

200

49,800

 

 –

50,000

Exercise of warrants ($0.50/share)

125,000

125

62,375

 –

62,500

Exercise of warrants ($0.75/share)

100,000

100

74,900

 –

75,000

Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)

10,000

10

2,990

 –

3,000

Common stock options exercised ($1.00/share)

192,000

192

191,808

 –

192,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share)

200,000

200

135,800

 –

136,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.65/share)

300,000

300

194,700

 –

195,000

Common stock issued in settlement of debt

3,930,879

3,931

1,568,421

 –

1,572,352

Common stock options and warrants vested

2,361,327

 –

2,361,327

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(4,923,057)

(4,923,057)

Currency translation adjustment

91,309

91,309

Balance, December 31, 2008

34,222,996

34,223

11,371,182

(2,264,854)

(9,463,199)

(374,331)

(696,979)

Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)

200,000

200

59,800

 –

60,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.53/share)

30,500

31

16,134

 –

16,165

Common stock issued for services ($0.68/share)

250,000

250

169,750

 –

170,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.40/share)

300,000

300

119,700

 –

120,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.49/share)

100,000

100

48,900

 –

49,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share)

240,000

240

74,160

 –

74,400

Common stock issued for services ($0.45/share)

300,000

300

134,700

 –

135,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.41/share)

55,000

55

22,495

 –

22,550

Common stock issued for services ($0.62/share)

100,000

100

61,900

 –

62,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.43/share)

30,000

30

12,870

 –

12,900

Common stock issued for services ($0.36/share)

50,000

50

17,950

 –

18,000


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-7




Common stock issued for services ($0.47/share)

100,000

100

46,900

 –

47,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.44/share)

50,000

50

21,950

 –

22,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)

100,000

100

29,900

 –

30,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share)

90,000

90

29,610

 –

29,700

Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share)

120,000

120

41,880

 –

42,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.37/share)

50,000

50

18,450

 –

18,500

Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share)

100,000

100

27,900

 –

28,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)

127,500

127

33,023

 –

33,150

Common stock options exercised ($0.21/share)

10,000

10

2,090

 –

2,100

Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)

100,000

100

19,900

 –

20,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share)

40,000

40

8,760

 –

8,800

Common stock options exercised ($0.35/share)

33,333

33

11,633

 –

11,666

Common stock options exercised ($0.30/share)

76,000

76

22,724

 –

22,800

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)

175,000

175

34,825

 –

35,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.30/share)

456,055

456

136,360

 –

136,816

Sale of common stock ($0.16/share)

3,025,000

3,025

480,975

 –

484,000

Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)

265,000

265

39,485

 –

39,750

Sale of common stock ($0.30/share)

100,000

100

29,900

 –

30,000

Sale of common stock ($0.35/share)

20,000

20

6,980

 –

7,000

Common stock options and warrants vested

2,275,961

 –

2,275,961

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(4,418,579)

(4,418,579)

Currency translation adjustment

(115,604)

(115,604)

Balance, December 31, 2009

40,916,384

40,916

15,428,747

(2,264,854)

(13,881,778)

(489,935)

(1,166,904)

Common stock issued for services ($0.39/share)

133,332

133

51,867

 –

52,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.35/share)

320,000

320

111,680

 –

112,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.33/share)

150,000

150

49,350

 –

49,500

Common stock issued for services ($0.31/share)

92,321

92

28,527

 –

28,619

Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)

110,000

110

32,890

 –

33,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.29/share)

150,000

150

43,350

 –

43,500

Common stock issued for services ($0.28/share)

200,000

200

55,800

 –

56,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)

3,200,000

3,200

828,800

 –

832,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share)

10,000

10

2,490

 –

2,500

Common stock issued for services ($0.24/share)

113,750

114

27,186

 –

27,300

Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)

150,000

150

29,850

 –

30,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share)

50,000

50

9,450

 –

9,500

Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share)

172,500

173

30,877

 –

31,050

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-8




Common stock issued for services ($0.17/share)

19,412

19

3,281

 –

3,300

Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share)

2,500,000

2,500

397,500

 –

400,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.14/share)

1,495,000

1,495

207,805

 –

209,300

Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share)

710,000

710

91,590

 –

92,300

Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share)

850,000

850

101,150

 –

102,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.11/share)

500,000

500

54,500

 –

55,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.10/share)

210,000

210

20,790

 –

21,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.09/share)

200,000

200

17,800

 –

18,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.08/share)

2,460,000

2,460

194,340

 –

196,800

Common stock issued for services ($0.07/share)

3,300,000

3,300

227,700

 –

231,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.05/share)

2,400,000

2,400

117,600

 –

120,000

Common stock issued in settlement of debt

2,042,888

2,043

293,778

 –

295,821

Sale of common stock ($0.33/share)

30,000

30

9,870

 –

9,900

Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)

919,999

921

136,954

 –

137,875

Sale of common stock ($0.14/share)

140,200

140

19,488

 –

19,628

Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)

1,185,000

1,185

117,315

 –

118,500

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.20/share)

125,000

125

24,875

 –

25,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share)

643,000

643

95,807

 –

96,450

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)

1,600,000

1,600

158,400

 –

160,000

Common stock options exercised ($0.40/share)

200,000

200

79,800

 –

80,000

Common stock options exercised ($0.15/share)

500,000

500

74,500

 –

75,000

Common stock options and warrants vested

1,553,666

 –

1,553,666

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(4,745,811)

(4,745,811)

Currency translation adjustment

(144,420)

(144,420)

Balance, December 31, 2010

67,798,786

67,799

20,729,373

(2,264,854)

(18,627,589)

(634,355)

(729,626)

Common stock issued for services ($0.30/share)

10,000

10

2,990

 –

3,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.265/share)

390,000

390

102,960

 –

103,350

Common stock issued for services ($0.26/share)

100,000

100

25,900

 –

26,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.25/share)

544,220

544

135,510

 –

136,054

Common stock issued for services ($0.235/share)

40,000

40

9,360

 –

9,400

Common stock issued for services ($0.23/share)

225,000

225

53,775

 –

54,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.22/share)

40,000

40

8,760

 –

8,800

Common stock issued for services ($0.21/share)

150,000

150

31,350

 –

31,500

Common stock issued for services ($0.20/share)

305,000

305

60,695

 –

61,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.19/share)

830,000

830

156,870

 –

157,700


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-9




Common stock issued for services ($0.18/share)

583,000

583

104,357

 –

104,940

Common stock issued for services ($0.15/share)

475,000

475

70,775

 –

71,250

Common stock issued for services ($0.258/share)

110,000

110

28,270

 –

28,380

Common stock issued for services ($0.259/share)

260,000

260

67,080

 –

67,340

Common stock issued for services ($0.13/share)

10,000

10

1,290

 –

1,300

Common stock issued for services ($0.16/share)

307,000

307

48,813

 –

49,120

Common stock issued for services ($0.12/share)

125,000

125

14,875

 –

15,000

Common stock issued for services ($0.105/share)

100,000

100

10,400

 –

10,500

Common stock issued in settlement of debt

300,000

300

59,700

 –

60,000

Common stock issued in settlement of debt

480,000

480

85,920

 –

86,400

Common stock issued in settlement of debt

480,000

480

81,120

 –

81,600

Common stock issued in settlement of debt

500,000

500

62,000

 –

62,500

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.15/share)

625,000

625

93,125

 –

93,750

Common stock options exercised (cashlessly)

187,500

187

(187)

 –

Sale of common stock ($0.15/share)

100,000

100

14,900

 –

15,000

Sale of common stock ($0.10/share)

712,500

713

70,537

 –

71,250

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.18/share)

532,000

532

95,228

 –

95,760

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)

6,430,600

6,431

636,629

 –

643,060

Common stock options and warrants vested

83,647

 –

83,647

Stock receivable

(10,000)

 –

(10,000)

Cancellation of common stock

(250,000)

(250)

250

 –

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

(2,132,373)

(2,132,373)

Currency translation adjustment

8,395

8,395

Balance, December 31, 2011

82,500,606

82,501

22,946,272

(10,000)

(2,264,854)

(20,759,962)

(625,960)

(632,003)

Stock issued for services ($0.103/share)

35,000

35

3,570

 –

3,605

Sale of units consisting of two share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)

350,000

350

34,650

10,000

 –

45,000

Sale of units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant ($0.10/share)

850,000

850

84,150

85,000

Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.25/share)

111,111

111

27,666

27,777

Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.10/share)

200,000

200

19,800

20,000

Stock issued for services for service at market price on grant date ($0.259/share)

50,000

50

12,900

12,950

Common stock options and warrants vested

479,607

 –

479,607

Purchase of treasury stock

– 

1,031,540

(101,440)

(101,440)

Retirement of treasury stock

(800,000)

(800)

(80,391) 

(800,000)

81,191

Stock payable

(20,000)

(20)

(3,980)

4,000

 –

Comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

1,380,832

1,380,832


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



F-10




Currency translation adjustment

(31,200)

(31,200)

Balance, December 31, 2012

83,276,717

83,277

23,524,244

231,540

(20,249)

4,000

(2,264,854)

(19,379,130)

(657,160)

1,290,128


The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.




F-11



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


1.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CONTINUANCE OF BUSINESS


Nature of Operations


WordLogic Corporation (the “Company” or “WLGC”), formerly TheAmericanWest.com, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 30, 1999. The Company’s primary business is the development and commercialization of data entry software for handheld computing devices. Its headquarters is located in Vancouver, BC, Canada.


Reverse Merger


On March 11, 2003, WLGC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”) with WordLogic Corporation (“WCPC”), a private British Columbia, Canada corporation. On May 27, 2003, WLGC issued 19,016,658 shares of its common stock in exchange for all 19,016,658 outstanding common shares of WCPC, and the two companies merged. This merger has been treated as a recapitalization of WCPC, with WLGC as the surviving legal entity. Since WLGC had, prior to the recapitalization, minimal assets and no operations, the recapitalization has been accounted for as the sale of 2,907,006 shares of WCPC’s common stock for the net assets of WLGC. Following the closing, WLGC remained the surviving corporation with 21,923,664 common shares outstanding, of which the former shareholders of WCPC owned approximately 86.74%.


In connection with the closing of the Agreement, WLGC changed its name to “WordLogic Corporation” (formerly TheAmericanWest.com, Inc.) and changed its OTCBB symbol under which its common stock trades on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board to “WLGC”. WLGC’s directors resigned their positions and the executive officers of WCPC were appointed to fill the vacancies created by the resignations, which resulted in a change in control.


Going Concern


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses prior to the current period, has used significant cash in support of its operating activities and, based upon current operating levels, requires additional capital or significant reconfiguration of its operations to sustain its operations for the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2012 the Company has incurred losses of $19,379,130 since inception. These factors, among others, raise significant doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.


The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis and ultimately to attain profitability. The Company’s management intends to satisfy cash requirements with working capital acquired in exchange for debt and/or common stock. There is no assurance the cash infusions will continue in the future or that the Company will achieve profitable operations.


The Company’s future success will be dependent upon its ability to create and provide effective and competitive software products that meet customers changing requirements; including the effective use of leading technologies to continue to enhance its current products and to influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes on a timely and cost-effective basis.


Development Stage


Following its reverse merger on May 27, 2003, the Company entered the development stage and became a development stage enterprise.


2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


a)

Basis of Presentation


These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.



F-12



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


b)

Basis of Consolidation


The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WordLogic Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary 602531 British Columbia Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”), an entity incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The Subsidiary does not have any operations. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


c)

Use of Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.


d)

Cash and Cash Equivalents


The Company considers all investment instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investment securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months but less than one year are considered short-term investments. Auction rate securities with original or remaining maturities of more than three months are considered short-term investments even if they are subject to re-pricing within three months. The Company was not invested in any auction rate securities as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Investment securities held with the intent to reinvest or hold for longer than a year, or with remaining maturities of one year or more, are considered long-term investments. The Company’s cash equivalents at December 31, 2012 consisted of term deposits with original maturities of three months or less, and are therefore classified as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying balance sheets.

 

Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash and term deposits of $581,605 and $14,787 at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.


e)

 Short and Long-term Investments


The Company accounts for its short-term and long-term investments in accordance with ASC 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. The Company’s short and long-term investments in securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains or losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities are reported in other income, net. The Company reviews the securities for impairments considering current factors including the economic environment, market conditions, and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the businesses underlying the securities. The Company records impairment charges equal to the amount that the carrying value of its available-for-sale securities exceeds the estimated fair market value of the securities as of the evaluation date. The fair value for publicly held securities is determined based on quoted market prices as of the evaluation date. In computing realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, the Company determines cost based on amounts paid, including direct costs such as commissions, to acquire the security using the specific identification method. The Company did not have any short or long-term investments in securities at December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.


The Company’s investment consisted of certified term deposit with original maturities of more than three months.  The Company realized interest income based on term deposit rate agreed upon with Royal Bank of Canada.  The company had term deposits totaling US $915,077 and $Nil at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  The company has recorded interest receivable of $515 and $Nil at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.


See Note 2.m for further information on fair value.




F-13



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


f)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


The Company considers its receivables to be fully collectable since the Company has only two receivable accounts, GST/HST (Goods and services tax/harmonized sales tax) receivable and interest receivable; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is required. The Company recognizes an allowance for doubtful accounts on specific accounts identified at risk based on the age of the outstanding receivable and the inability or unwillingness of its customers to make the required payments.


g)

Property and Equipment


Property and equipment are stated at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Asset

 

Method

 

Rate

 

 

 

 

 

Computer equipment

 

Straight-line

 

33.3%

Computer software

 

Straight-line

 

100.0%

Furniture and fixtures

 

Declining balance

 

20.0%

Other equipment

 

Declining balance

 

20.0%


Amortization is recorded at one-half of the normal rate in the year of acquisition. We have compared the depreciation taken using the declining balance method to the straight-line method and have determined the difference to be immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.


Upon retirement or disposition of equipment, the cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.


h)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


The Company evaluates the carrying value of its long-lived assets under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. If such assets are impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell.


i)

Software Development Costs


Software development costs are recorded in accordance with the provisions issued by the FASB as follows. Costs incurred to establish the technological feasibility of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred as research and development costs. Once technological feasibility is established, the cost of producing product masters for the software is capitalized. Capitalization of the software development costs ceases and amortization of the capitalized costs commences when the product is available for general release to customers. Capitalized costs are amortized based on the greater of (a) the ratio of current gross revenues to the total current and anticipated future gross revenues, or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.


j)

Research and Development


Expenditures relating to the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements to existing products, are charged to operations as incurred.




F-14



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


k)

Income Taxes


The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.


l)

Revenue Recognition


The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with ASC 985-605, Revenue Recognition – Software (“ASC 985-605”), or ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements.


Pursuant to ASC 985-605, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is probable. The Company applies these criteria as discussed below:


·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. The Company requires a written contract, signed by both the customer and the Company, or a purchase order from those customers that have previously negotiated a standard end-user license arrangement or volume purchase agreement, prior to recognizing revenue on an arrangement.


·

Delivery has occurred. The Company delivers software and hardware to customers physically. The standard delivery terms are free on board shipping point.


·

The fee is fixed or determinable. The Company’s determination that an arrangement fee is fixed or determinable depends principally on the arrangement’s payment terms. Where these terms apply, the Company regards the fee as fixed or determinable, and recognizes revenue upon delivery (assuming other revenue recognition criteria are met). If the payment terms do not meet this standard, but rather, involve “extended payment terms,” the fee may not be considered to be fixed or determinable and the revenue would then be recognized when customer installments are due and payable.


·

Collectability is probable. To recognize revenue, the Company judges collectability of the arrangement fees on a customer-by-customer basis pursuant to a credit review policy. The Company typically sells to customers with which it has had a history of successful collections. For new customers, the Company evaluates the customer’s financial position and ability to pay. If the Company determines that collectability is not probable based upon the credit review process or the customer’s payment history, revenue is recognized when cash is collected.


If there are any undelivered elements, the Company defers revenue for those elements, as long as vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for the undelivered elements. Payment for product is due upon shipment, subject to specific payment terms. Payment for professional services is due either upon or in advance of providing the services, subject to specific payment terms. Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses and shipping costs, which have not been significant to date, are recognized as revenue in accordance with ASC 605-45, Revenue Recognition – Principal Agent Considerations.


The Company earns revenue from the sale of its software products and from royalties earned on software licensing agreements. Revenue from the sale of software products is recognized at the point of delivery, which occurs when customers either download the software or are shipped software products. Royalty revenue is recognized in accordance with the terms of licensing agreements and when collectability is reasonably assured, which is usually on receipt of royalty payments.  


The Company also recognizes revenue from the licensing of the intellectual property portfolio according to ASC 985-605, based on the terms of agreements involved.


The Company has not established a formal policy affecting warranty or returns.  No estimate of returns from sales has been made.



F-15



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


m)

Fair Value for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities


The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10 35-37 are described below:


Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.


Level 2 Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.


Level 3 Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.


The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2012. The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2012, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the year ended December 31, 2012.


The Company’s operations are in Canada, which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The financial risk to the Company’s operations results from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.


In accordance with ASC 820, the following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (investments) as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


Level

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Level 1

 

$915,077

 

$nil

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 


n)

Foreign Currency Translation


The Company’s functional currency is the Canadian dollar and these financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with standards issued by the FASB. The Canadian dollar based accounts of the Company’s foreign operations have been translated into United States dollars using the current rate method. Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period. Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity.    



F-16



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


o)

Stock-based Compensation


On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted standards issued by the FASB, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and shares issued through its employee stock purchase plan, based on estimated fair values. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 (“SAB 107”) relating to this standard. The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of this standard. The Company adopted the FASB standard using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of the beginning in 2006. The Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the impact of this standard. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Company’s financial statements for prior periods do not include the impact of this standard.


The Company’s determination of estimated fair value of share-based awards utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding certain highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to the Company’s expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors.


p)

Net Income (Loss) per Share


Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock is presented in conformity with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), for all periods presented. In accordance with ASC 260, basic net income (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants that have a dilutive effect when applying the treasury stock method.


The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:


 

 

Year Ended December 31

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

  Net income (loss) – basic and diluted

$

1,380,832

$

(2,132,373)

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

  Basic weighted average common shares outstanding

 

83,726,680

 

73,623,959

  Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

    Stock options

 

 

    Warrants

 

 

  Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

 

83,726,680

 

73,623,959

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per share - basic

$

0.02

$

(0.03)

Net income (loss) per share - diluted

$

0.02

$

(0.03)


Due to a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011, basic and diluted net loss per share are equivalent as the inclusion of potential common shares in the number of shares used for the diluted computation would be anti-dilutive to the net loss per share. Since the market price of the Company’s share is lower than the exercise price of outstanding stock options and warrants, there is no dilutive effect for the year ended December 31, 2012.


q)

Comprehensive Income (Loss)


The Company reports its comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with provisions of the FASB.  For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s only component of comprehensive loss was foreign currency translation adjustments.



F-17



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


r)

Advertising Costs


Advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred.


s)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, “Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update)” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02. This update amends ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This update defers the requirement to present items that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in both the statement of income where net income is presented and the statement where other comprehensive income is presented. The adoption of ASU 2011-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11 “Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this pronouncement may have on its results of operations or financial position.


In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The guidance in ASU 2011-08 is intended to reduce complexity and costs by allowing an entity the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment to determine whether it should calculate the fair value of a reporting unit. The amendments also improve previous guidance by expanding upon the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider between annual impairment tests in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Also, the amendments improve the examples of events and circumstances that an entity having a reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount should consider in determining whether to measure an impairment loss, if any, under the second step of the goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.



F-18



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. ASU 2011-05 will become effective for the Company on December 1, 2012. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, items of other comprehensive income that are reclassified to profit or loss are required to be presented separately on the face of the financial statements. This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring that such amounts be presented either in a single continuous statement of income and comprehensive income or separately in consecutive statements of income and comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.


In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. Additional disclosure requirements in the update include: (1) for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about unobservable inputs used, a description of the valuation processes used by the entity, and a qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of the measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs; (2) for an entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset that is different from the asset’s highest and best use, the reason for the difference; (3) for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required, the fair value hierarchy level in which the fair value measurements were determined; and (4) the disclosure of all transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. ASU 2011-04 will become effective for the Company on December 1, 2012. We are currently evaluating ASU 2011-04 and have not yet determined the impact that adoption will have on our financial statements.


In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”. This amendment explains which modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”). Under the new guidance, the definition of a troubled debt restructuring remains essentially unchanged, and for a loan modification to be considered a TDR, certain basic criteria must still be met. For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructuring occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. ASU 2011-02 has become effective for the Company on September 1, 2012. The Company does not believe that the guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.


The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.


t)

Reclassifications


Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period’s financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.


3.

RESTRICTED CASH


As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had restricted cash balances of $174,561 and $10,865, respectively.  This cash was held in trust by our attorneys for the payment of future legal invoices and by the Supreme Court of British Columbia for a contingent legal obligation as summarized as follows:


 

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

Attorney trust

 

$26,764

 

$10,865

Garnishment

 

$147,797

 

nil

Total

 

$174,561

 

$10,865


The garnished amount of $147,797 is related to a legal proceeding filed by Mr. Knaven for a contingent legal obligation. The outcome of any legal disputes cannot be reliably predicted at this time, nor can the Company provide a timeline for resolution. See Note 16 – Legal Proceedings of the Notes to Financial Statements for further information regarding legal proceedings.



F-19



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


4.

INVESTMENTS


TERM DEPOSITS


The company had held-to-maturity certified term deposits with original maturity date more than three months totaling $915,077 at December 31, 2012 as follows:


Investment Date

 

Amount

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

 

 

$

 

 

September 18, 2012

 

250,000

February 18, 2013

0.30%

December 17, 2012

 

200,000

April 17, 2013

0.25%

December 17, 2012

 

200,000

May 17, 2013

0.25%

December 17, 2012

 

200,000

June 17, 2013

0.25%

April 10, 2012

 

50,000

April 10, 2013

0.35%

May 29, 2012

 

15,077

May 29, 2013

1.00%

Total

 

915,077

 

 


The Company has recorded an accrued interest receivable of $515 for above term deposits as of December 31, 2012 based on statements provided by Royal Bank of Canada.


5.

PREPAID EXPENSES


As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had prepaid expenses of $54,032 and $12,271, respectively. Prepaid expenses have been incurred for marketing and advertisement fees and security deposit for an office leased property. Prepaid expenses consisted of the following:


Vendor

 

December 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

$

 

Bentall L.P.

 

12,543

 

12,271

GSMA Ltd.

 

29,710

 

Vantage Communication Ltd.

 

8,443

 

Others

 

3,336

 

Total

 

54,032

 

12,271


6.

GST/HST RECEIVABLE


The Good Service Tax (“GST”) is a federal tax that applies to the supply of most property and services in Canada. As of July 1, 2010, British Columbia (“BC”) harmonized its provincial sales tax (“PST”) with the GST to implement the harmonized sales tax (“HST”) at the rate of 12%. All businesses operating in BC are responsible for collecting and remitting HST to the Canadian government. A GST/HST registrant should collect the GST/HST on most of their sales and pay the GST/HST on most purchases they make to operate their business. They can claim an input tax credit (“ITC”), to recover GST/HST paid or payable on the purchases they use in commercial activities. However, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company has not collected any GST/HST since all sales were incurred in the United State which sales are not HST taxable. The Company has filed GST/HST returns quarterly and claimed only ITC’s during the year ended December 31, 2012. As the result of this, as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had GST/HST refund receivable of $32,724 (CAD $32,558) and $14,840 (CAD $15,092), respectively.




F-20



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


7.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


 

Cost

$

Accumulated

Amortization

as of

December 31,

2012

$

Net Carrying

Amount

as of

December 31,

2012

$

Net Carrying

Amount

as of

December 31,

2011

$

Office equipment

10,921

4,505

6,416

264

Computer equipment

154,358

143,785

10,573

584

Computer software

7,126

7,126

-

-

Furniture and fixtures

16,987

14,611

2,376

1,048

 

 

 

 

 

 

189,392

170,027

19,365

1,896


Depreciation expense totaled $3,577 and $667 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.


8.

BANK LOANS PAYABLE


Represents loans from the Royal Bank of Canada, repayable upon demand, as follows:


a.

In the amount of CDN$nil (US$nil) as at December 31, 2012, CDN$24,950 (US$24,533) as at December 31, 2011, requiring monthly blended payments of CDN$835 (US$821) including principal and interest at 4.25% per annum.  The loan was paid in full during the twelve months period ended December 31, 2012.


b.

In the amount of CDN$nil (US$nil) as at December 31, 2012, CDN$13,747 (US$13,541) as at December 31, 2011, requiring monthly blended payments of CDN$1,540 (US$1,514) including principal and interest at 5.02% per annum.  The loan was paid in full during the twelve months period ended December 31, 2012.


9.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES


The Company incurred the following related party transactions:


a.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by a director to provide management services requiring monthly payments of $CAD 30,000, expiring December 31, 2012. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $360,151 ($CAD 360,000) and $365,202 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  On March 14, 2012, the Company has paid a performance bonus of $133,985 to this private company. As at December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $10,144.


b.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company incurred accounting fees of $32,764 with a private company of which an officer is also an officer.  As at December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $5,026.


c.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of $US 17,000, expiring March 17, 2013. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $168,881 for the year ended December 31, 2012. As at December 31, 2012 the amount owing to this private company totaled $nil.


d.

The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of $CAD 17,000 increased from 15,000 on September 1, 2012, expiring April 27, 2013. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $149,878 for the year ended December 31, 2012. As at December 31, 2012 the amount owing to this private company totaled $10,373.




F-21



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


10.

NOTES PAYABLE


Promissory Notes


a.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company received proceeds of $20,400 on an unsecured promissory note and repaid $9,500, leaving a balance owing of $10,900 at December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company received further proceeds of $17,000 and settled $21,900 through the issuance of shares of its common stock, leaving a balance owing of $6,000 at December 31, 2011.  The balance of $6,000 was paid in full and accrued interest balance of $2,947 was forgiven during the nine month period ended December 31, 2012.


Interest expense on the note during the twelve months period ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $2,107 and $2,331, respectively.


11.

COMMON STOCK


For the year ended December 31, 2012:


a.

On December 31, 2012, The Company recorded the issuance of 111,111 shares of its common stock for services. Shares were valued at $0.25 per share and valued at $27,778 based on the market price on date of the issuance, May 11, 2011.  


b.

Also on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 200,000 shares of its common stock for services. Shares were valued at $0.10 per share and valued at $20,000 based on the market price on date of the issuance, July 21, 2011.


c.

Also on December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the issuance of 50,000 shares of its common stock at $0.259 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $12,950 based on the market price on date of the issuance, June 1, 2011.


d.

In January 2012, the Company issued 35,000 shares of its common stock at $0.103 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $3,605 based on the price on the date of grant.


e.

In January 2012, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 350,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $35,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and two warrants to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


f.

In February 2012, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 850,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $85,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


For the year ended December 31, 2011:


a.

In January 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.30 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $3,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


b.

Also in January 2011, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 570,000 units at a price of $0.15 per share for total proceeds of $85,500. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share.


c.

Also in January 2011, the Company issued 390,000 shares of its common stock at $0.265 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $103,350 based on the price on the date of grant.  140,000 of these shares were issued to an officer of the Company.


d.

Also in January 2011, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $50,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


e.

Also in January 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock registered on a Form S-8 at $0.26 per share for services rendered by an officer valued at $26,000 based on the price on the date of grant.



F-22



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


f.

Also in January 2011, the Company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock at $0.21 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $31,500 based on the price on the date of grant.


g.

In February 2011, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 600,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $60,000.  Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share.


h.

Also in February 2011, the Company issued 85,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $17,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


i.

Also in February 2011, the Company issued 97,220 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share for services rendered by an officer valued at $24,305 based on the price on the date of grant.  


j.

In March 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.19 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $1,900 based on the price on the date of grant.


k.

Also in March 2011, the Company settled $42,500 of an outstanding promissory note through the issuance of 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock.  Shares issued were valued at fair value of $0.20 which resulted in a loss on conversion of $17,500.


l.

Also in March 2011, the Company issued 40,000 shares of its common stock at $0.22 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $8,800 based on the price on the date of grant.


m.

Also in March 2011, the Company issued 575,000 shares of its common stock at $0.19 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $109,250 based on the price on the date of grant.


n.

Also in March 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 55,000 units at a price of $0.15 per share for total proceeds of $8,250. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.25 per share.


o.

In April 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.19 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $1,900 based on the price on the date of grant.


p.

Also in April 2011, the Company conducted private placement offerings whereby it issued 1,610,600 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $161,060.  1,310,600 of the units consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share and 300,000 of the units consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and two warrants to purchase two additional shares of common stock, also exercisable at $0.10 per share.


q.

Also in April 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 112,500 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for proceeds receivable of $11,250.


r.

Also in April 2011, the Company issued 187,500 shares of its common stock in exercise of stock options, cashless.


s.

Also in April 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 175,000 units at a price of $0.18 per share for total proceeds of $31,500. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.40 per share.


t.

Also in April 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $20,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


u.

Also in April 2011, the Company issued 40,000 shares of its common stock at $0.235 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $9,400 based on the price on the date of grant.


v.

Also in April 2011, the Company issued 132,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $33,000 based on the price on the date of grant.



F-23



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


w.

Also in April 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.258 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $9,030 based on the price on the date of grant.


x.

In May 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.258 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $2,580 based on the price on the date of grant.


y.

Also in May 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 357,000 units at a price of $0.18 per share for total proceeds of $64,260. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.40 per share.


z.

Also in May 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 320,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $32,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.15 per share.


aa.

Also in May 2011, the Company issued 115,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $28,750 based on the price on the date of grant.


bb.

In June 2011, the Company issued 260,000 shares of its common stock at $0.259 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $67,340 based on the price on the date of grant.


cc.

Also in June 2011, the Company issued 225,000 shares of its common stock at $0.24 per share for services rendered by  consultants valued at $54,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


dd.

Also in June 2011, the Company issued 115,000 shares of its common stock at $0.19 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $21,850 based on the price on the date of grant.


ee.

Also in June 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share for proceeds of $15,000.


ff.

In July 2011, the Company issued 110,000 shares of its common stock at $0.19 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $20,900 based on the price on the date of grant.


gg.

Also in July 2011, the Company issued 583,000 shares of its common stock at $0.18 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $104,940 based on the price on the date of grant.


hh.

Also in July 2011, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $37,500 based on the price on the date of grant.


ii.

Also in July 2011, the Company issued 120,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $24,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


jj.

Also in July 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 125,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $12,500. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


kk.

Also in July 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 185,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $18,500.


ll.

In August 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.19 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $1,900 based on the price on the date of grant.


mm.

Also in August 2011, the Company issued 165,000 shares of its common stock at $0.16 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $26,400 based on the price on the date of grant.



F-24



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


nn.

Also in August 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $15,000 based on the price on the date of grant.


oo.

Also in August 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.13 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $1,300 based on the price on the date of grant.


pp.

Also in August 2011, the Company settled outstanding debt totaling $48,000 through the issuance of 480,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price recorded at the market price on the date of grant, being $0.17 per share.  Accordingly, we recorded a loss on settlement for the difference in the fair value of the shares issued and the debt extinguished of $33,600.


qq.

Also in August 2011, the Company settled outstanding debt totaling $48,000 through the issuance of 480,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price recorded at the market price on the date of grant, being $0.18 per share.  Accordingly, we recorded a loss on settlement for the difference in the fair value of the shares issued and the debt extinguished of $38,400.


rr.

Also in August 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 150,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for proceeds of $15,000.


ss.

Also in August 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 2,375,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $237,500. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


tt.

In September 2011, the Company issued 142,000 shares of its common stock at $0.16 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $22,720 based on the price on the date of grant.


uu.

Also in September 2011, the Company issued 115,000 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $17,250 based on the price on the date of grant.


vv.

Also in September 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 300,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $30,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


ww.

In October 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.15 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $1,500 based on the price on the date of grant.


xx.

Also in October 2011, the Company issued 115,000 shares of its common stock at $0.12 per share for services rendered by consultants valued at $13,800 based on the price on the date of grant.


yy.

Also in October 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 15,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for proceeds of $1,500.


zz.

Also in October 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 150,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $15,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


aaa.

Also in October 2011, the Company settled outstanding debt totalling $21,900 through the issuance of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price recorded at the market price on the date of grant, being $0.125 per share.  Accordingly, we recorded a loss on settlement for the difference in the fair value of the shares issued and the debt extinguished of $40,600.


bbb.

In November 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of its common stock at $0.12 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $1,200 based on the price on the date of grant.


ccc.

Also in November 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 150,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for proceeds of $15,000.



F-25



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


ddd.

Also in November 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 200,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $20,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.


eee.

In December 2011, the Company conducted a private placement offering whereby it issued 850,000 units at a price of $0.10 per share for total proceeds of $75,000. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company's common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock, exercisable at $0.10 per share.  Proceeds of $10,000 in connection with 100,000 of the units issued, remain receivable as at December 31, 2011.


fff.

Also in December 2011, the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.105 per share for services rendered by a consultant valued at $10,500 based on the price on the date of grant.


The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s share purchases with warrants attached:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Warrants

 

Weighted average

exercise price

$

 

Weighted average remaining contractual life

(in years)

Balance, December 31, 2010

2,577,555

 

0.20

 

1.40

Issued

9,537,600

 

0.14

 

1.29

Exercised

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

(456,055)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

11,659,100

 

0.13

 

1.42

Issued

1,550,000

 

0.10

 

1.59

Exercised

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

(2,121,500)

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2012

11,087,600

 

0.11

 

0.78


12.

TREASURY STOCK


On August 15, 2012, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing up to five million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock to be repurchased over a 12 month period commencing on August 20, 2012. Any shares repurchased by the Company shall be returned to the treasury and may be used, if and when needed, for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2012, the Company purchased 1,031,540 common shares for USD $101,440, at an average price of USD $0.0983 per share. In December 10, 2012, the Company retired 800,000 shares of common stock from treasury stock. Following are our monthly stock repurchases and retirement for the year ended December 31, 2012.


Period

 

Total number of Shares Purchased or Retired

 

 

Average Price Paid per Share

August 1, 2012 – August 31, 2012

 

99,000

 

$

0.0961

September 1, 2012 – September 31, 2012

 

333,000

 

$

0.1007

October 1, 2012 – October 31, 2012

 

370,140

 

$

0.1036

November 1, 2012 – November 30, 2012

 

229,400

 

$

0.0874

December 10, 2012, retirement of treasury stock

 

(800,000)

 

$

-

 

 

231,540

 

$

0.0983




F-26



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


13.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


The Company has, since incorporation, adopted three stock option plans. The first plan is dated February 15, 2001, amended on October 15, 2009, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock. The second plan is dated February 15, 2005, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock. The third plan is dated July 30, 2012, under which the Company is authorized to grant options to acquire up to a total of 10,000,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to the stock option plans, options granted are subject to vesting terms which range from immediate vesting to various stages over a period of one year including monthly vesting, at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.


During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company adopted the 2008 Stock Compensation Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000 and 2,000,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock, to be registered on Form S-8, to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.  On May 14, 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Share Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons. On July 30, 2012, the Company adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan on Form S-8 under which the Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 registered shares of its common stock to qualified persons.


Compensation Warrants Granted to Non-employees


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted compensation warrants to purchase a total of 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant. The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The warrants expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $342. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $342 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these warrants. These warrants could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 100% of the Shares subject to the warrants shall vest three months after August 1, 2012, subject to the holder of warrants continuing to be a Service Provider on such date.


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted compensation warrants to purchase a total of 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant. The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The warrants expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for warrants granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of warrants granted was $85,413. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $85,413 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. These warrants could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 75% of the Shares subject to the warrants shall vest one month after August 1, 2012, and 25% of the Shares subject to the warrants shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the holder of warrants continuing to be a Service Provider on such dates.


Options Granted to Employees


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $67,292. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $67,292 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. These options could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 100% of the Shares subject to the warrants shall vest three months after August 1, 2012, subject to the optionee continuing to be a Service Provider on such date.


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 675,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $37,852. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $37,852 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer’s private company. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $112,151. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $112,151 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.



F-27



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer’s private company. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $74,300. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $74,300 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. Above three options and this option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 75% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest one month after August 1, 2012, and 25% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a Service Provider on such dates.


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 180,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $11,129. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $4,637 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 190,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to three employees. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $11,747. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $4,895 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.


On August 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an officer. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $61,829. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $25,762 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. Above two options and this option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with followings: 50% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest six months after August 1, 2012, and 25% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a Service Provider on such dates.


On October 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately. The options expire October 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $60,738. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $45,554 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.


On October 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately. The options expire October 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $12,148. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $9,111 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.


On October 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately. The options expire October 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $12,148. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $9,111 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options.


On October 1, 2012, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 70,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately. The options expire October 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of stock options granted was $4,252. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $3,189 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. Above three options and this option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with followings: 75% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest one month after October 1, 2012, and 25% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a Service Provider on such dates.



F-28



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


The fair value for warrants and stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $0.0593 and $ nil per share, respectively. The weighted average assumptions used are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Years Ended

 

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

 

 

 

Expected dividend yield

0%

-

Risk-free interest rate

0.21%

-

Expected volatility

164.31%

-

Expected option life (in years)

1.33

-


The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $nil and $nil respectively.


The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s compensation warrants to non-employees:


 

Number of Warrants

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2011

1,340,000

$ 0.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

1,255,000

0.10

 

 

Exercised

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

(990,000)

0.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2012

1,605,000

$ 0.12

0.88

$nil

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2012

1,605,000

$ 0.12

0.88

$nil


The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s stock options granted to employees:


 

Number of Options

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)

Aggregate Intrinsic Value

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2011

3,200,000

$ 0.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

8,040,000

0.10

 

 

Exercised

 

 

Expired/Cancelled

(350,000)

0.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2012

10,890,000

$ 0.24

1.69

$nil

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2012

9,152,500

$ 0.39

1.70

$nil




F-29



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of December 31, 2012, and changes during the year ended December 31, 2012, is presented below:


Nonvested shares

Number of Shares

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

 

 

 

Nonvested at January 1, 2012

-

Granted

9,295,000

Vested

(7,557,500)

 

 

 

Nonvested at December 31, 2012

1,737,500


As at December 31, 2012 there was $71,733 total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements.


14.

PATENTS LICENSING REVENUE


On February 29, 2012, the Company entered into a Patent License Agreement (“Agreement”) with RPX Corporation (RPX) whereby the Company granted a patent license to RPX. Under the terms of the Agreement, RPX’s affiliated members are granted the non-exclusive right to use patents for the remainder of the patents’ lives and the release of past infringement in exchange for a one-time payment of $5.0 million which is non-refundable and non-cancellable. The Company is under no obligation to keep the patents current and does not give up ownership of the patents nor do they have to provide any future services.


Pursuant to ASC 985-605, the Company recognizes patents licensing revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is probable. The Company applies these criteria as discussed below:


·

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. The Agreement itself is persuasive evidence.


·

Delivery has occurred. Delivery has occurred as RPX Corporation has access to the patents and all economic benefits of the transaction have passed from one party to the other.


·

The fee is fixed or determinable. The fee of the Agreement is $5 million which is non-refundable and non-cancellable.


·

Collectability is probable. Collection has been received on March 7, 2012.


Based on ASC 985-605-25, if the arrangement does not require significant production, modification, or customization of software, revenue shall be recognized when above four criteria are met. The Agreement does not require significant production, modification or customization such as maintenance agreements, technical support, training, consulting, and other multi element arrangements, therefore the Company does not need to allocate patents licensing revenue over elements. As such, the Company has recorded the entire $5 million to patents licensing revenue in the current period. However, included in selling, general and administrative expenses is $750,000 commission related to patents licensing agreement.


15.

GAIN ON SETTLED PAYABLES


The Company had recorded a gain on settled payables of US $12,451 based on the release agreement provided by an unrelated creditor, Manning Elliott on June 15, 2012.


The Company settled an outstanding note payable with an unrelated party, Carrillo Huettel, LLP, on June 22, 2012, and outstanding interest payable of $2,947 was then forgiven.




F-30



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


16.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


CIVIL LITIGATION


In January, 2011 Mr. Knaven, a former officer and director of the Company, commenced a complaint to British Columbia’s Employment Standards Branch against the Company (the “ESB Complaint”) alleging that he was owed unpaid wages.  In October, 2011, Mr. Knaven initiated two further legal proceedings against the Company in B.C. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court Actions”), in which he advanced further complaints in respect of claims for shares and interest, a claim for wrongful dismissal, and further claims for general and unspecified damages.


Regarding the ESB Complaint, on October 24, 2012 the Company applied successfully for a ruling placing that complaint in abeyance, to be dealt with by the B.C. Supreme Court rather than the ESB.  In accordance with that ruling, Mr. Knaven on November 9, 2011 delivered a proposed amendment to one of the Supreme Court Actions.  The quantified portion of Mr. Knaven’s claims totals approximately $261,752. He also seeks general and unspecified damages which are unquantified. Notwithstanding, $147,797 is held in trust by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the subject of a garnishment (See also Note 3).


The Company vigorously contests the claims, and has filed Responses and Counterclaims regarding all of the above referenced disputes.  The Counterclaims name Mr. Knaven and others as defendants by counterclaim. Mr. Knaven has been served and has filed Responses disputing and denying the Counterclaims.  


The other defendants by counterclaim have not yet been served.  They include Mr. Mike Flom who appears to have been involved in assisting Mr. Knaven in formulating and advancing Knaven’s various claims against the Company.  In addition, although Mr. Flom has neither threatened nor served any legal proceedings of his own, Mr. Flom had, during 2012, asserted that the Company owed him a “termination” payment and related sums totaling in excess of $500,000, and the issuance of shares.  The Company has put Mr. Flom on notice that it does not accept those assertions.


In October, 2012, Biller Communications (“Biller), a former consulting firm of the Company, commenced a complaint to Supreme Court of the State of New York against the Company alleging that the Company owes Biller $30,456, pursuant to a contract. The Company vigorously contests that the Company owes Biller any money. The Company filed a Verified Answer raising numerous defenses and Discovery Demands upon the attorneys for Biller.


Subsequent to December 31, 2012, the Company received notice from the former Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), threatening a “whistle blower” claim pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank legislation, to be commenced in the State of New York, alleging he was forced to resign because he was investigating expenses incurred by the Chief Executive Officer.  The Company denies the allegations, and further maintains the matter is to be resolved by arbitration. Accordingly it has commenced an arbitration in British Columbia, Canada to resolve the issues. The Company also appointed an independent director to conduct an investigation into the allegations raised by the former COO to report to the Board of Directors on the outcome of his investigation, together with recommendations. The report was delivered to the Board of Directors on March 13, 2013.    


On April 2, 2013, a complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Paul Silverstein against the Company in regards to certain claims asserted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by Mr. Silverstein related to allegations of fraud and the termination of Mr. Silverstein as President and CEO of the Corporation. The Corporation has not yet responded to the claims and the complaint is in the initial stages.


The outcome of above litigations possible litigation cannot be reliably predicted at this time, nor can the Company provide a timeline for resolution.




F-31



WORDLOGIC CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


17.

INCOME TAXES


Deferred income taxes reflect the tax consequences on future years of differences between the tax bases.  The deferred tax assets are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets

$1,461,368

 

$2,062,311

Valuation allowance

(1,461,368)

 

(2,062,311)

 

 

 

 

Net future income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

In assessing the realizability of future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax assets will not be realized.  The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of future tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.  Management has provided for a valuation allowance on all of its losses as there is no assurance that future tax benefits will be realized.


Our operating loss carry-forwards $4,298,140 at December 31, 2012, $6,065,622 at December 31, 2011 will begin to expire in 2028.


18.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


On February 14, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a director. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and vested immediately. The options expire February 14, 2018. These warrants could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following: 40% of the Shares subject to the warrants shall vest upon the grant date, and 30% of the Shares subject to the warrants shall vest on July 14, 2013 and the remaining 30% shall vest on February 14, 2014, and each case subject to the optionee continuing to be a director on such dates. However, on March 25, 2013, these options were replaced by warrants to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share and are exercisable immediately. The warrants will expire March 25, 2018.


On March 8, 2013, options to purchase a total of 675,000 shares of the Company’s common stock granted to a former officer  expired, not having been exercised.


Also on March 8, 2013, options to purchase a total of 3,325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock granted to a private company owned by a former officer expired, not having been exercised.


Also on March 14, 2013, compensation warrants to purchase a total of 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock granted to a former consultant expired, not having been exercised.


On April 2, 2013, a complaint was filed with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York by Paul Silverstein against the Company in regards to certain claims asserted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by Mr. Silverstein related to allegations of fraud and the termination of Mr. Silverstein as President and CEO of the Corporation. The Corporation has not yet responded to the claims and the complaint is in the initial stages.


Subsequent events have been reviewed through the date of this report.




F-32





ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.


None.


ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.


Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, using the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").  


A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.


1.

We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions.  


2.

We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at December 31, 2012, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however, there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.

     

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls.


As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO. 



17






Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  


This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our Board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:


1.

Our Board of Directors will nominate an independent financial expert on our Board of Directors in the next fiscal year.


ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.




18






PART III


ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Identification of Directors and Executive Officers


The following table sets forth the names, ages, date of appointment and other public company directorships of our current directors and officers.

 

 

 

 

Name and Age

Position(s) Held

Tenure

Other Public Company Directorships

Frank R. Evanshen, 64

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

From May 27, 2003 to present

None

Darrin McCormack, 47

Chief Financial Officer

From August 13, 2007 to present

None

Mark Dostie, 43

Chief Technology Officer

From April 26, 2012 to present

None

T. Allen Rose, 56

Secretary, Treasurer and Director

May 27, 2003 to present

None


Term of Office


Each of our officers is elected by the Board of Directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she dies, resigns or is removed from office.  Each director of the Company serves for a term of one (1) year until our next annual meeting of the shareholders or unless they die, resign or are removed earlier.


Background and Business Experience


The business experience during the past five years of each of the persons presently listed above as an Officer or Director of the Company is as follows:


Franklin R. Evanshen has been the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since May 27, 2003.  Mr. Evanshen has been a venture capitalist and merchant banker for over 25 years and has extensive experience in raising capital for private and public ventures. He received his Bachelor of Arts from Loyola College in Montreal in 1970.


Darrin McCormack has been our Chief Financial Officer since August 13, 2007. Mr. McCormack is a Certified General Accountant and Certified Fraud Examiner and is the managing partner in the firm D. McCormack & Company Inc, CGA’s from July 1995 to present.  Mr. McCormack has been a CGA in public practice since 1988. He received his diploma in Financial Accounting from Malaspina College in Nanaimo, BC in 1986.


Mark Dostie has over 20 years of professional software engineering experience.  Mr. Dostie is the owner of Echelon Systems Consulting, where he has worked for the past eleven years.  Echelon Systems is a consultancy company specializing in business consulting, systems implementation, and project and portfolio management.  Mr. Dostie also serves as the Principal Consultant, Senior Business Analyst and Senior Software Engineer of Echelon Systems.  His responsibilities include overseeing all operations of the ompany and developing all software for customers.  Prior to working for Echelon Systems, Mr. Dostie has served as CEO, CTO. Lead Architect and Project Manager for numerous companies including MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates, PriceWaterhouse Coopers, eMediaIT.  The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Dostie as Chief Technology Officer of the Company on account of his extensive experience in mobile, machine learning and other software technology.


T. Allen Rose has served as a Director and the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company since May 27, 2003.  Mr. Rose resigned as our Chief Financial Officer on August 13, 2007. Mr. Rose is a Chartered Accountant and has been in senior financial management for numerous private and public companies since 1983. He received his Bachelor of Commerce in Finance & Accounting from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario in 1979.

 

Significant Employees

 

Other than the officers and directors described above, we do not expect any other individuals to make a significant contribution to our business.




19






Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships among our officers, directors or persons nominated for such positions.


Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings


During the past ten years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:


(1)

A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;


(2)

Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);


(3)

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:


i.

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;


ii.

Engaging in any type of business practice; or


iii.

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;


(4)

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;


(5)

Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;


(6)

Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;


(7)

Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:


i.

Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or


ii.

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or


iii.

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or


(8)

Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.



20






Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act


Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company.  Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the year ended December 31, 2012, Forms 5 and any amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2012, and the representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2012, our executive officers and directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.


Code of Ethics


We have adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  A written copy of the Code is available on written request to the Company.


Audit Committee

 

We established a separately-designated standing audit committee on February 19, 2008.  The committee consists of Darrin McCormack, our Chief Financial Officer and T. Allen Rose, a Director, Secretary and Treasurer.  However, Darrin McCormack, the financial expert serving on our audit committee, is also our Chief Financial Officer; therefore, he is not an independent member of our committee.  Further, T. Allen Rose is not an independent member of our committee, as he is also an officer of the Company.  Due to the lack of an independent member, the Company’s audit committee does not function as an audit committee should since there is a lack of independent directors on the committee and the Board of Directors has not identified an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K), who is knowledgeable about reporting and financial statements requirements, to serve on the audit committee due to the Company’s inability to attract such a person.


The Company intends to establish a new audit committee of the Board of Directors that shall consist of independent directors.  The audit committee’s duties will be to recommend to the Company’s board of directors the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements and to review the Company’s accounting and auditing principles.  The audit committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls.  The audit committee shall at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.




21






ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Summary Compensation Table


The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our executive officers during the years ending December 31, 2012 and 2011. 


Summary Compensation Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and principal position

Year

Salary ($)

Bonus ($)

Stock Awards ($)

Option Awards ($)

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Compensation ($)

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)

All Other Compensation ($)

Total ($)

 

Franklin Evanshen President, CEO and Director

 

2012

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

$494,136 (1)

$494,136

 

 

2011

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

$365,202

$365,202

 

 

Darrin McCormack CFO

 

2012

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

$32,764 (2)

$32,764

 

 

 

2011

nil

nil

$41,000

nil

nil

nil

$32,970

$73,970

 

 

 

Paul Silverstein

Chief Operating Officer (3)

2012

nil

nil

nil

$224,302 (4)

nil

nil

$168,881 (5)

$393,183

 

 

 

 

2011

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

 

 

 

 

Mark Dostie

Chief Technology Officer (6)

2012

nil

nil

nil

$25,762 (7)

nil

nil

$149,878 (8)

$175,640

 

 

 

 

 

2011

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

 

 

 

 

 

T. Allen Rose Secretary, Treasurer, Director and Former CFO 

2012

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

$4,002

$4,002

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

 

 

 

 

 

 Peter Knaven

Former Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer and Director (9)

2012

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

$146,081

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

$146,081

 

 

 

 

 

 James P. Yano Former Chief Operations Officer (10)

2012

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

nil

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

nil

nil

$18,000

nil

nil

nil

nil

$18,000

 

 

 

 

 




22






(1)

Represents management consulting fees paid to Meridian Capital Corp. (“MCC”). MCC, a company controlled by Franklin R. Evanshen, has a management agreement with the Company for services provided personally by Mr. Evanshen in his role as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement currently requires monthly payments of approximately $30,013 USD ($30,000 CAD) for services rendered. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $360,151 USD ($CAD 360,000) and $365,202 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  On March 14, 2012, the Company has paid a performance bonus of $133,985 to this private company. As at December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $10,144.

(2)

Represents amounts incurred with D. McCormack & Company Inc., a company of which Darrin McCormack is an officer, for accounting and financial management services provided personally by Mr. McCormack in his role as Chief Financial Officer.  Under the agreement, fees are charged at approximately $111 USD ($110 CAD) per hour.

(3)

Mr. Paul Silverstein has served as our Chief Operations Officer since April 18, 2012.  According to Mr. Silverstein’s consulting agreement, Mr. Silverstein will serve as the Company’s Chief Operations Officer from March 6, 2012 until March 5, 2013.  Mr. Silverstein resigned from his position on December 7, 2012.

(4)

On August 1, 2012, the Company granted to Mr. Silverstein’s private company and his trust options to purchase a total of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and fair value of stock options granted was $224,302. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $224,302 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. This option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with followings: 75% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest one month after August 1, 2012, and 25% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a Service Provider on such dates.

(5)

Represents consulting fees paid to The Zamnu Inc. (“Zamnu”). Zamnu, a company controlled by Paul Silverstein, has a management agreement with the Company for services provided personally by Mr. Paul Silverstein in his role as our Chief Operating Officer. The agreement requires monthly payments of approximately $17,000 USD for services rendered.

(6)

Mr. Mark Dostie has served as our Chief Technology Officer since April 25, 2012.  According to Mr. Dostie’s consulting agreement, Mr. Dostie will serve as the Company’s Chief Technology Officer from March 19, 2012 until March 19, 2013.

(7)

On August 1, 2012, the Company granted to Mr. Mark Dostie options to purchase a total of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options carry an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The options expire August 1, 2014. The fair value for options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and fair value of stock options granted was $61,829. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded stock-based compensation of $25,762 as a general and administrative expense in connection with these options. This option could be exercised, in whole or in part, in accordance with followings: 50% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest six months after August 1, 2012, and 25% of the Shares subject to the option shall vest each quarter thereafter, subject to the optionee continuing to be a Service Provider on such dates.

(8)

The Agreement provided for Mr. Mark Dostie to be paid approximately $17,007 USD ($17,000 CAD) per month in exchange for his services.

(9)

Peter Knaven is our former Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer and Director. Mr. Knaven had an Employment Agreement with the Company for his employment as a Software Programmer and Developer. The Agreement provided for Mr. Knaven to be paid approximately $16,231 ($16,000 CAD) per month in exchange for his services. During the year ended December 31, 2010, Mr. Knaven resigned as a Director of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2011, Mr. Knaven resigned as Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer.



23






(10)

James P. Yano is our former Chief Operations Officer. According to that certain Consulting Agreement entered into by and between the Company and Mr. Yano, Mr. Yano shall serve as Chief Operations Officer of the Company from October 1, 2008 until September 30, 2011 in exchange for a monthly salary of $18,000 and options to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Options”) with the following conditions:


a.

The Options will vest at a rate of 40,000 per month, with any remainder vesting on September 30, 2011.


b.

The Options are exercisable at $0.80 per share and contain cashless exercise provisions.


c.

Vested Options will expire 24 months after vesting.  All Options, whether vested or unvested, will expire upon the delivery of notice of the termination of the Consulting Agreement.


d.

The Consulting Agreement may be terminated by either Mr. Yano or the Company with 7 days written notice.


Mr. Yano’s Consulting Agreement was amended on October 1, 2009. According to the amended agreement, the monthly salary of $18,000 was cancelled; however, Mr. Yano was to continue his services and will remain entitled to the above Options. Subsequently, Mr. Yano resigned as the Company’s Chief Operations Officer.


Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table


There are no compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from the Company with respect to any executive officer, that would result in payments to such person because of his or her resignation, retirement or other termination of employment with the Company or its subsidiaries, any change in control, or a change in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of the Company.


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End


The table below summarizes the outstanding equity awards to our executive officers as of December 31, 2012.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPTION AWARDS

Name

Number of Common Shares Underlying Unexercised Options

(#) Exercisable

Number of Common Shares Underlying Unexercised Options

(#) Unexercisable

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)

Option Exercise Price

($)

Option Expiration Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Darrin McCormack

100,000

200,000

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$0.27

$0.52

March 6, 2014

April 27, 2014

Paul Silverstein

4,000,000

Nil

Nil

$0.10

August 1, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Dostie

1,000,000

1,000,000

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

$0.30

$0.10

November 1, 2013

August 1, 2014

T. Allen Rose

250,000

Nil

Nil

$0.80

Aug. 18, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 




24






Long-Term Incentive Plans


There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.


Compensation of Directors


The Company paid $4,002 to one of our board members for their services during the year ended December 31, 2012.


Compensation Committee


We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors.  The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.


ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number of shares of our Common Stock, owned beneficially as of April 2, 2013 by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) each person or group known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock.  Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.


As of April 2, 2013, there were 83,276,717 common shares, 12,495,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase options, and 11,087,600 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants issued and outstanding.

 

 

 

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Title of Class

Amount &

Nature of

Beneficial

Ownership

(1)

Percent of Class

(2)(%)

Franklin R. Evanshen (3)

1280 Braeside Street

W. Vancouver BC Canada V7T 2L2

Common

9,864,059 (4)

9.23%

Mark Dostie (5)

1130 West Pender Street, Suite 230

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4A4

Common

2,000,000 (6)

1.87%

Darrin McCormack (7)

1729 Pavenham Rd.

Cowichan Bay

BC, Canada V0R 1N1

Common

630,000 (8)

0.59%

T. Allen Rose (9)

2400 – 650 W. Georgia St.

Vancouver, BC Canada V6B 4N7

Common

250,000 (10)

0.23%

Paul Silverstein (11)

1130 West Pender Street, Suite 230

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4A4

Common

4,000,000 (12)

3.74%

All Officers and Directors as a Group (5 Persons)

Common

16,744,059

15.67%

Harold Gunn 

1116 Ironwork Passage 

Vancouver

British Columbia V6H 3P1

Common

6,054,836

5.67%




25






(1) The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table.


(2) Based on 83,276,717 issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of April 2, 2013 plus 12,495,000 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase options, and 11,087,600 shares issuable upon exercise of stock purchase warrants issued and outstanding.


(3) Franklin R. Evanshen is the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of the Company.


(4) Includes 9,858,383 common shares held under his own name, and 5,676 common shares held by MCC Meridian Capital Corp., a company controlled by Franklin R. Evanshen.


(5) Mark Dostie is the Chief Technology Officer of the Company.


(6) Includes options to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock.


(7) Darrin McCormack is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.  


(8) Includes 330,000 common shares and options to purchase 300,000 shares of our Common Stock.


(9) T. Allen Rose is the Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of the Company.


(10) Includes options to purchase 250,000 shares of our Common Stock.


(11) Paul Silverstein was the Chief Operating Officer of the Company.


(12) Includes options to purchase 4,000,000 shares of our Common Stock.


Changes in Control


There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.


ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


Director Independence

 

For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2). The OTCBB on which shares of common stock are quoted does not have any director independence requirements.  The NASDAQ definition of “Independent Director” means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.


According to the NASDAQ definition, neither Frank R. Evanshen nor T. Allen Rose is an independent director because they are also executive officers of the Company.


Related Party Transactions


The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by a director to provide management services requiring monthly payments of $CAD 30,000, expiring December 31, 2012. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $360,151 ($CAD 360,000) and $365,202 ($CAD 360,000) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  On March 14, 2012, the Company has paid a performance bonus of $133,985 to this private company. As at December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $10,144.



26






During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company incurred accounting fees of $32,764 with a private company of which an officer is also an officer.  As at December 31, 2012, the amount owing to this private company totaled $5,026.


The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of $US 17,000, expiring March 17, 2013. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $168,881 for the year ended December 31, 2012. As at December 31, 2012 the amount owing to this private company totaled $nil.


The Company has entered into an agreement with a private company controlled by an officer to provide management services requiring monthly payments of $CAD 17,000 increased from 15,000 on September 1, 2012, expiring April 27, 2013. Management fees incurred by the Company totaled $149,878 for the year ended December 31, 2012. As at December 31, 2012 the amount owing to this private company totaled $10,373.


Other than the foregoing, none of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of its Common Stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company.

 

With regard to any future related party transaction, we plan to fully disclose any and all related party transactions in the following manner:


·

disclosing such transactions in reports where required;


·

disclosing in any and all filings with the SEC, where required;


·

obtaining disinterested directors consent; and


·

obtaining shareholder consent where required.


Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons


We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.


ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES


 

Year Ended

December 31, 2012

Year Ended

December 31, 2011

Audit fees

$22,023

$26,434

Audit-related fees

$nil

$nil

Tax fees

$nil

$nil

All other fees

$nil

$nil

Total

$22,023

$26,434


Audit Fees


During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred approximately $22,023 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.


During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, we incurred approximately $26,434 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and review of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.



27






Audit-Related Fees


The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 for assurance and related services by our principal independent accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements (and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A) was $0 and $0, respectively.


Tax Fees


The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 for professional services rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $nil and $nil, respectively.


All Other Fees


The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 for products and services provided by our principal independent accountants (other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A) was $0 and $0, respectively.




28






PART IV

 

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS.


(a)

Documents filed as part of this Report.


Exhibit

 

 

Number

Description of Exhibit

Filing

 3.01

Articles of Incorporation

Filed with the SEC on ­­­­­­­­­­June 8, 2001 as part of our Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G.

 3.01a

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

Filed with the SEC on May 21, 2003 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB.

 3.01b

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

Filed with the SEC on August 8, 2012 as part of our Current Report on Form 8-K.

 3.02

Bylaws

Filed with the SEC on ­­­­­­­­­­June 8, 2001 as part of our Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G.

 4.01

2012 Equity Incentive Plan

Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.

 4.02

 Sample Stock Option Agreement

Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.

 4.03

Sample Stock Award Agreement for Restricted Stock

Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.

 4.04

Sample Stock Award Agreement for Stock Units

Filed with the SEC on August 3, 2012 as part of our Registration Statement on Form S-8.

 10.01

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $6,000 dated August 5, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.02

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $3,500 dated August 5, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.03

Settlement Agreement between Richard Kozukan and Jim Yano dated August 25, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.04

Website Services Agreement between the Company and Creative Web, Inc. dated August 31, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.05

Consulting Agreement between the Company and Douglas Schreiner dated September 8, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.06

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $3,500 dated October 28, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.07

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $2,500 dated October 28, 2010

Filed with the SEC on November 22, 2010 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.08

Settlement Agreement between the Company and Luis Carrillo dated November 29, 2010

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.09

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $4,900 dated January 13, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.10

Settlement Agreement between the Company and Mirador Consulting, Inc. dated February 2, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.11

Settlement Agreement between the Company and Luis Carrillo dated March 9, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.12

Promissory Note to Anthony Amado for $42,500 dated March 24, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.13

Settlement Agreement between the Company and Anthony Amado dated March 24, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.14

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $3,000 dated March 25, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.15

Promissory Note to Luis Carrillo for $14,000 dated May 9, 2011

Filed with the SEC on May 23, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.



29






 10.16

Settlement Agreement between the Company and Luis Carrillo dated October 21, 2011

Filed with the SEC on November 14, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.17

Cancellation Agreement between the Company and Frank R. Evanshen dated October 27, 2011

Filed with the SEC on November 14, 2011 as part of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 10.18

Promissory Note for Luis Carrillo for $3,500 dated February 27, 2012.

Filed with the SEC on April 13, 2012 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 14.01

Code of Ethics

Filed with the SEC on April 14, 2005 as part of our Annual Report on Form 10K-SB.

 16.01

Letter from Former Accountant Manning Elliott LLP dated March 13, 2009

Filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009 as part of our Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A.

 31.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14

Filed herewith.

 31.02

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14

Filed herewith.

 32.01

CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Filed herewith.

 32.02

CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Filed herewith.

101.INS*

XBRL Instance Document

Filed herewith.

101.SCH*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

Filed herewith.

101.CAL*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

Filed herewith.

101.LAB*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

Filed herewith.

101.PRE*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Filed herewith.

101.DEF*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

Filed herewith.


*Pursuant to Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.





30






SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


WORDLOGIC CORPORATION



Dated:  April 10, 2013

/s/ Franklin Evanshen       

By: Franklin Evanshen

Its: President & Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  April 10, 2013

/s/ Darrin McCormack     

By: Darrin McCormack

Its:  Chief Financial Officer & Chief Accounting Officer



Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:



Dated:  April 10, 2013

/s/ Franklin Evanshen      

By: Franklin Evanshen

Its:  Director



Dated:  April 10, 2013

/s/ T. Allen Rose               

By: T. Allen Rose

Its:  Director




31