are unable to establish or maintain
successful relationships with independent distributors and retailers, we would need to further develop our own distribution and sales and marketing
capabilities, which would be expensive and time-consuming and the success of which would be uncertain.
We currently have two key distributors
of our Home and Garden Products. If any distributor or retailer that purchases a significant amount of our Home and Garden Products were to discontinue
purchasing our products any time, our sales would be adversely affected. In addition, the failure of any of these distributors and retailers, or any
other distributor or retailer to which we extend a significant amount of credit, to pay its account now or in the future may harm our operating
results.
The market for Home and Garden Products is competitive and we
may not have the resources required to compete effectively. The high level of competition in these markets may result in price reductions, reduced
margins or the inability of our products to achieve market acceptance.
The market for home and garden plant
protection and plant health products is intensely competitive, rapidly changing and undergoing consolidation. We may be unable to compete successfully
against our current or future competitors, which may result in price reductions, reduced margins or the inability to achieve market acceptance of our
products. We expect competition within the plant protection and plant health industry to intensify as regulatory pressures on traditional chemical
solutions increase. This may occur as advances in plant protection and disease resistance technologies become more widely known.
The plant health industry is dominated
by multinational chemical and pharmaceutical companies, including The Scotts Miracle-Grow Company, Syngenta AG, BASF AG, and Bayer AG. Many of the
large chemical pesticide companies are also developing products that they believe are less environmentally harmful than traditional chemical pesticides
and that may directly compete with our Home and Garden Products. Other small companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly
through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Furthermore, academic institutions, government agencies and other public and
private research organizations may also conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for discovery, research,
development and marketing of products similar to ours.
Many of our current and potential
future competitors have significantly more capital, research and development, regulatory, manufacturing, distribution, sales, marketing, human and
other resources than we do. As a result, they may be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products, receive greater
resources and support from independent distributors, initiate or withstand substantial price competition or take advantage of acquisition or other
opportunities more readily. Furthermore, large chemical and pharmaceutical companies have a more diversified product offering than we do, which may
give them an advantage in meeting customer needs by enabling them to offer integrated solutions to plant protection and plant health in the Home and
Garden Market.
Our Home and Garden Business depends on products that are
based on the same new technology, and our commercialization of those products may not be successful.
We are dependent on the successful
commercialization in the Home and Garden Market of three products (Messenger, Messenger Seed Treatment and MightyPlant with Messenger Gold, the latter
of which was introduced into the Home and Garden Market in the second quarter of 2007) that are based on the same new technology. Substantially all of
our sales in the Home and Garden Market have come from our first harpin protein and from a single product, Messenger. These sales have been limited and
quite small in comparison to the size of the overall Home and Garden Market. Our Home and Garden Products may not be commercially successful and may
not prove effective or economically viable. In addition, because our Home and Garden Products have not been put to widespread use over significant
periods of time, no assurance can be given that adverse consequences might not result from their use, such as soil or other environmental degradation,
the development of negative effects on animals or plants or reduced benefits in terms of plant health or protection.
A variety of factors would determine
the success of our market development and commercialization efforts and the rate and extent of acceptance of our Home and Garden Products, including
our ability to implement and maintain an appropriate pricing policy, general economic conditions in the Home and Garden
19
Market, weather conditions and the
extent to which the general public and regulatory authorities accept new plant and seed protection and plant health products developed through
biotechnology.
Our inability to obtain regulatory approvals, or to comply
with ongoing and changing regulatory requirements, could delay or prevent sales of our Home and Garden Products.
The sale and use of plant health
products containing harpin proteins are extensively regulated by the EPA and/or state, local and foreign governmental authorities. These regulations
substantially increase the cost and time associated with bringing our Home and Garden Products to market. All EPA (federal) registrations were
transferred to Plant Health Care in connection with the sale of our harpin protein technology while state registrations and permits are not
transferable. We currently sell our Home and Garden Products pursuant to regulatory approvals under the EPAs me too registration
process and will subsequently register our Home and Garden Products in the States and other jurisdictions, as necessary. If we do not continue to
receive the necessary governmental approvals to market these products, obtain required approvals in the future, or if the regulatory authorities revoke
our approvals or grant them subject to restrictions on their use, we may be unable to sell our Home and Garden Products and our business may
fail.
We are required to obtain regulatory
approval from certain state and foreign regulatory authorities before we market our products in those jurisdictions. Some of these jurisdictions may
apply different criteria than the EPA in connection with their approval processes. Although we are currently authorized to sell Messenger for virtually
all home and garden uses in 49 states, and in California for disease management use on strawberries, grapes and fruiting vegetables, we may not be able
to obtain future registrations for current or future products or maintain these registrations.
Even if we obtain all necessary
regulatory approvals to market and sell our products, these products will be subject to continuing review and extensive regulatory requirements. The
EPA, as well as state and foreign governmental authorities, could withdraw a previously approved product from the market upon discovery of new
information, including an inability or failure to comply with regulatory requirements or the occurrence of unanticipated problems with the product, or
for other reasons. In addition, federal, state and foreign regulations relating to plant protection products developed through biotechnology are
subject to public concerns and political circumstances and, as a result, regulations have changed and may change substantially in the future. These
changes may result in limitations on the manufacturing, marketing or use of our current and any future Home and Garden Products.
We may be exposed to product liability claims, which could
adversely affect our operations.
We may be held liable or incur expenses
to settle product liability claims if the products we sell cause injury or are found unsuitable during product testing, manufacturing, marketing, sale
or use. These risks exist even with respect to any products that have received, or may in the future receive, regulatory approval, registration or
clearance for commercial use. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to avoid product liability exposure.
We currently maintain product liability
insurance at levels we believe are sufficient and consistent with industry standards for companies at our stage of development. Our product liability
insurance may not be adequate, and, at any time, it is possible that such insurance coverage may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or
at all. A product liability claim could result in liability to us greater than our assets and insurance coverage. Moreover, even if we have adequate
insurance coverage, product liability claims or recalls could result in negative publicity or force us to devote significant time and attention to
matters other than those that arise in the normal course of business.
Rapid changes in technology could render our products
unmarketable or obsolete.
We are engaged in an industry
characterized by extensive research efforts and rapid technological development. Our competitors, which generally have substantially greater
technological and financial resources than we do, may develop plant protection and plant health technologies and products that are more effective than
ours or that render harpin protein-based technology and our Home and Garden Products obsolete or
20
uncompetitive. To be successful, we
will need to continually enhance our products and develop and market new products that keep pace with new technological and industry
developments.
If we are unable to retain our existing personnel, we may not
be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our objectives.
We are highly dependent on the efforts
and abilities of Nathaniel T. Brown, our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and secretary. Our failure to retain Mr. Brown would
seriously disrupt our operations and our ability to explore our NOL Strategy or any other business strategy, and increase our expenses by forcing us to
use more expensive outside consultants and impair our ability to generate revenue.
Risks Related to Our Business Plan to Utilize Net Operating
Loss Carryforwards
Our ability to realize potential value from our net operating loss carryforwards is highly speculative and subject to numerous material
uncertainties.
From and after the sale of our harpin
protein technology until our boards approval of the Plan of Dissolution, our business strategy, which we refer to in this proxy statement as our
NOL Strategy, had been to use the proceeds from the sale of our harpin protein technology to fund the working capital requirements of our Home and
Garden Business while we explore whether there may be opportunities, through acquisitions or otherwise, to realize potential value from our remaining
business assets, primarily our net operating loss carryforwards. If the Plan of Dissolution is not approved by our shareholders or is not otherwise
implemented, we may seek to continue to pursue our NOL Strategy. However, our NOL Strategy is extremely speculative and subject to a large number of
risks and uncertainties, including those set forth in this section and elsewhere in our public filings with the SEC. In order to confirm whether there
are opportunities to realize potential value from our net operating loss carryforwards, we have engaged legal advisors to validate the underlying
assumptions related to our net operating loss carryforwards and analyze and provide advice on the options that may be available to preserve and
maximize the potential use of our deferred tax assets, as well as on potential limitations and risks of such utilization strategy. This will continue
to be an expensive and time consuming process, and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue from our Home and Garden Business or otherwise
attract sufficient capital to support the process for its duration. A continued business plan for the utilization of our net operating loss
carryforwards may not be successfully implemented or may not result in any increase in shareholder value, and the continued pursuit of our NOL Strategy
may consume substantially all of our remaining cash resources.
We may not be able to realize value from, or otherwise
preserve and utilize, our net operating loss carryforwards.
As noted above, our business strategy
had been to explore whether there may be opportunities to realize potential value from our net operating loss carryforwards. Our net operating loss
carryforwards permit us to apply our net operating losses from prior fiscal years to taxable income in future years in order to reduce our tax
liability.
As we have incurred losses since our
inception and do not currently expect to turn a profit in the near future, we are unable to realize value from our net operating loss carryforwards
unless we find a way to become profitable, either through the acquisition of a profitable company or otherwise. The success of our NOL Strategy is
predicated on maintaining the value of and utilizing all or substantially all of our net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income
of our company or any acquired company. This strategy would be adversely affected if we are unable to realize value from, or otherwise preserve and
utilize, our net operating loss carryforwards, including for any of the following reasons:
|
|
Past Ownership Changes. In the event that we were to
undergo an ownership change (as defined in Section 382 of the Code), our net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to the ownership
change would be subject to annual limitations, which could reduce, eliminate, or defer the utilization of these losses. Generally, an ownership
change occurs if one or more shareholders, each of whom owns 5% or more in value of a corporations stock, increase their aggregate
percentage ownership by more than 50% over the lowest percentage of stock owned by those shareholders at any time during the preceding three-year
period. Based upon an analysis completed during the third quarter of |
21
|
|
2007 of past ownership changes (as defined under Section 382 of
the Code), we believe that we have experienced ownership changes on March 20, 1996 and October 2, 2000. Absent any other ownership changes in the
future, we believe there are no significant limitations on our future ability to use net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to those dates.
We do not believe that the sale of assets to Plant Health Care in February 2007 resulted in another ownership change that would further limit our
future ability to use net operating loss carryforwards generated after October 2000 because it was a sale of assets. However, the Internal Revenue
Service, or IRS, or some other taxing authority may disagree with our position and contend that we have already experienced other
such ownership changes or that the sale of assets resulted in an ownership change. |
|
|
Future Ownership Changes. Even if an ownership change has
not occurred in the past, there is still the potential for an ownership change to occur under Section 382 of the Code as a result of future changes in
stock ownership. For example, if shareholders do not approve the Plan of Dissolution, the holders of our common stock, including one or more of the
holders of 5% or more of our common stock, could sell their shares in sufficient quantities to trigger an ownership change. In addition, if
shareholders do not approve the Plan of Dissolution and we continue to explore whether there may be opportunities to utilize our net operating loss
carryforwards, we will be limited in our ability to issue additional stock in the future to provide capital for our business due to the importance of
avoiding a future ownership change. We would only be able to issue additional stock in a manner that would not cause an ownership change pursuant to
Section 382 of the Code. Accordingly, our ability to access the equity markets or issue stock in connection with an acquisition could be
restricted. |
|
|
Change of Control. In order to preserve our net operating
loss carryforwards, we must ensure that there has not been a change of control of our company. A change in control includes a
more than 50 percentage point increase in the ownership of our company by certain equity holders who are defined in Section 382 of the Code as 5
percent shareholders. The IRS has viewed an acquisition of an ownership percentage in a company that is represented by certain equity
instruments, including certain preferred stock, debt instruments, or stock options, that are issued in connection with a change in the board of
directors to include the holders of the equity instruments or their agents as indicative of a transfer of a beneficial ownership interest in a company
under Section 382 of the Code. Accordingly, a change in our board of directors that is accompanied by other equity events could be viewed as
contributing to a more than 50 percentage point change in control of our company under Section 382 of the Code. |
|
|
De Facto Liquidation. In order to preserve our net
operating loss carryforwards, there must not be a de facto liquidation of our company. The IRS has interpreted a de facto
liquidation to include a sale or discontinuation of the current business of a company. Accordingly, the IRS may view the Plan of Dissolution as a
strong factor in a potential determination that a de facto liquidation of our Home and Garden Business has occurred. |
For additional information about our
NOL Strategy and other risks related to this strategy, see Proposal 1: Approval of Plan of Dissolution Background and Reasons for the
Proposed Dissolution and Liquidation Our Operations and Strategy after the Sale of Harpin Protein Technology and
Background beginning on page 28, and Risks Related to Our Business Plan to Utilize Net Operating Loss
Carryforwards.
We may not be able to use our net operating loss carryforwards
because we may not generate taxable income.
The use of our net operating loss
carryforwards is subject to uncertainty because, in addition to the factors discussed above, it is dependent upon the amount of taxable income we
generate. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient taxable income, if any, in future years to use the net operating loss carryforwards
before they expire. We believe that our ability to achieve profitability would depend in substantial part on our ability to identify and acquire
suitable businesses on favorable terms, so that we can increase our revenues and generate new income. Despite our significant efforts since February
2007, we have been unable to identify a suitable acquisition and may be unable to identify or complete any acquisitions in the future. Moreover, any
such transactions may not be successful or enable us to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards. In order to complete any acquisition to
effectuate our NOL Strategy we may need to seek additional capital, including through the sale of stock or other securities, which may result in
dilution to
22
existing shareholders and the
granting of superior rights to the new shareholders. In addition, as noted above, the provisions of the Code and certain applicable Treasury
regulations will limit the number of shares of stock we can sell from time to time without causing a limitation on our ability to use our net operating
loss carryforwards to reduce our future tax obligations.
The IRS could challenge the amount of our net operating loss
carryforwards.
The amount of our net operating loss
carryforwards has not been audited or otherwise validated by the IRS. The IRS could challenge the amount of our net operating loss carryforwards, which
could significantly reduce our net operating loss carryforwards. In addition, calculating whether an ownership change has occurred is subject to
uncertainty, both because of the complexity and ambiguity of Section 382 of the Code and because of limitations on a publicly-traded companys
knowledge as to the ownership of, and transactions in, its securities. Therefore, the calculation of the amount of our net operating loss carryforwards
may be changed as a result of a challenge by a governmental authority or our learning of new information about the ownership of, and transactions in,
our securities.
Possible changes in legislation could negatively affect our
ability to use the tax benefits associated with our net operating loss carryforwards.
The rules relating to U.S. federal
income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, resulting
in revisions of regulations and revised interpretations of established concepts as well as statutory changes. Revisions in U.S. federal tax laws and
interpretations thereof could adversely impair our ability to use the tax benefits associated with our net operating loss
carryforwards.
Limits on ownership of our common stock and our shareholder
rights plan could have an adverse consequence to you and could limit your opportunity to receive a premium on our stock.
As noted above, if we continue to
explore our NOL strategy, we must avoid an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code in order to potentially retain the ability to use our net
operating loss carryforwards to offset future income. This means that a potential buyer of our stock might be deterred from acquiring our common stock
while we still have significant tax losses being carried forward, because such an acquisition might trigger an ownership change and severely impair our
ability to use our tax losses against future income. Thus, this potential tax situation could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change in control and, therefore, could adversely affect our shareholders ability to realize a premium over the then prevailing market price for
our common stock in connection with a change in control.
To further deter a potential buyer of
our stock from accumulating an ownership position that could jeopardize our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, in June 2007, our
board of directors adopted a shareholder rights plan and declared a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right on each outstanding
share of our common stock. This shareholder rights plan is described in more detail below under the risk factor titled Risks Related to
Our Common Stock Certain provisions in our charter document and Washington law, as well as our shareholder rights plan, could discourage a
change of control or make it difficult to change the composition of directors and management. The shareholder rights plan may make it more
difficult for other persons or entities, without the approval of our board of directors, to make a tender offer or otherwise acquire substantial
amounts of our common stock, or to launch other takeover attempts that a shareholder might consider to be in such shareholders best
interests.
The shareholder rights plan also may
limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. The shareholder rights plan could also
result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code which may severely impair our ability to use our tax losses against future
income.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We may be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market if we do not satisfy continued listing requirements.
Our common stock currently trades on
The Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to meet any of the continued listing standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market, our common stock will be delisted.
Nasdaqs
23
continued listing standards include
specifically enumerated criteria, such as a $1.00 minimum closing bid price, shareholders equity of $2.5 million or market value of publicly held
shares of $35.0 million and 500,000 shares of common stock publicly held and market value of publicly held shares of at least $1 million, as well as
additional or more stringent criteria that may be applied in the exercise of Nasdaqs discretionary authority to maintain the quality of and
public confidence in the Nasdaq market, prevent fraudulent and manipulative practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade, and protect
investors and the public interest. For example, we failed to satisfy Nasdaqs $1.00 minimum bid price requirement on more than one occasion over
the past few years. If we were unable to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, our common stock would have been delisted from The
Nasdaq Capital Market. Each time we were able to cure the failure to satisfy the minimum bid price requirement and avert having our common stock
delisted. However, we have no assurance that Nasdaq will not in the future seek to delist us for our failure to meet the enumerated conditions for
continued listing. In particular, prior to the public announcement of the decision of our board of directors to adopt the Plan of Dissolution, the
trading price of our common stock had generally been trading below $1.00 per share for the prior two months. If our shareholders do not approve the
Plan of Dissolution, we believe it is likely that the price of our common stock will fall below Nasdaqs $1.00 minimum bid price requirement and
that our common stock will eventually be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market. In addition, if our Home and Garden Business continues to generate
declining revenues, we may be deemed a shell company, which may result in delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market.
If our common stock were delisted from The Nasdaq Capital
Market, you may find it difficult to dispose of your shares.
If our common stock were to be delisted
from The Nasdaq Capital Market, trading of our common stock most likely will be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin
board established for unlisted securities such as the Pink Sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. Such trading will reduce the market liquidity of our
common stock. As a result, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common
stock.
If our common stock is delisted from
The Nasdaq Capital Market and the trading price remains below $5.00 per share, which is likely, trading in our common stock might also become subject
to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any
trade involving a stock defined as a penny stock (generally, any equity security not listed on a national securities exchange that has a
market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). Many brokerage firms are reluctant to recommend low-priced stocks to their
clients. Moreover, various regulations and policies restrict the ability of shareholders to borrow against or margin low-priced stocks, and
declines in the stock price below certain levels may trigger unexpected margin calls. Additionally, because brokers commissions on low-priced
stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher priced stocks, the current price of the common stock can
result in an individual shareholder paying transaction expenses that represent a higher percentage of total share value than would be the case if our
share price were higher. This factor may also limit the willingness of institutions to purchase our common stock. Finally, the additional burdens
imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from facilitating trades in our common stock, which could severely
limit the market liquidity of the stock and the ability of investors to trade our common stock.
Certain provisions in our charter documents and Washington
law, as well as our shareholder rights plan, could discourage a change of control or make it difficult to change the composition of directors and
management.
Provisions of our charter documents and
Washington law, as well as our shareholders rights plan, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control, even if this
change would be beneficial to our shareholders. In addition, some of these provisions may make it difficult for shareholders to remove or replace our
current directors and management in the event our shareholders believe this would be in the best interests of our company and our shareholders. Our
articles of incorporation and bylaws:
|
|
prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors, which
would otherwise allow holders of less than a majority of the stock to elect some directors; |
24
|
|
stagger our board of directors, making it more difficult to
elect a majority of the directors on our board and preventing our directors from being removed without cause; |
|
|
limit who may call special meetings of shareholders;
and |
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominating candidates
for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by shareholders at shareholder meetings. |
Washington law imposes restrictions on
certain transactions between a corporation and significant shareholders. Chapter 23B.19 of the WBCA prohibits a target corporation, with some
exceptions, from engaging in particular significant business transactions with an acquiring person, which is defined as a person or group of persons
that beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting securities of the target corporation, for a period of five years after the date the acquiring person
first became a 10% beneficial owner of voting securities of the target corporation, unless the business transaction or the acquisition of shares is
approved by a majority of the members of the target corporations board of directors prior to the time the acquiring person first became a 10%
beneficial owner of the target corporations voting securities. Prohibited business transactions include:
|
|
a merger or consolidation with, disposition of assets to, or
issuance or redemption of stock to or from the acquiring person; |
|
|
termination of 5% or more of the employees of the target
corporation; or |
|
|
receipt by the acquiring person of any disproportionate benefit
as a shareholder. |
After the five-year period, a
significant business transaction may occur if it complies with fair price provisions specified in the statute. A corporation may not opt
out of this statute. This provision may have an antitakeover effect with respect to transactions that our board of directors does not approve in
advance.
In June 2007, our board of directors
adopted a shareholder rights plan and declared a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right on each outstanding share of our common
stock. In addition to helping to protect the utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards by deterring a potential buyer of our stock from
accumulating an ownership position that could jeopardize our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, the shareholder rights plan is
also designed to ensure that our board of directors has adequate time to consider any proposed transaction involving the Company and that all of our
shareholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of a proposed takeover of the Company.
The rights will be exercisable only if
a person or group acquires 5%, or in the case of any person or group that owned beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock on June 1,
2007, 13% (or 18% in the case of SF Holding Corp., an existing investor that owned in excess of 16% of our outstanding common stock on June 1, 2007) or
more of our outstanding common stock or launches or announces an intent to launch a tender or exchange offer that could result in the offeror becoming
the beneficial owner of 5%, 13% or 18%, as the case may be, or more of our common stock. Each right will entitle shareholders to buy one one-hundredth
of a share of a series of preferred stock called Series R Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $36.00.
If a person or group acquires 5%, 13%
or 18%, as the case may be, or more of our outstanding common stock, each right will entitle its holder (other than the acquiring person or group) to
purchase, at the rights then-current exercise price, the number of shares of our common stock having a market value of twice the exercise price.
In addition, if we are acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person has acquired 5% or 13%, as the case may be, or
more of our outstanding common stock, each right will entitle its holder to purchase, at the rights then-current exercise price, a number of the
acquiring companys common shares having a market value of twice the exercise price.
Following the acquisition by a person
or group of beneficial ownership of 5% or 13%, as the case may be, or more of our outstanding common stock and before the acquisition of 50% or more of
this common stock, our board of directors may exchange all or part of the rights (other than rights owned by the acquiring person or group) for a
consideration per right consisting of one-half of the common stock that would be issuable upon the exercise of one right. Alternatively, the rights are
redeemable for one cent per right at the
25
option of our board of directors,
prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 5% or 13%, as the case may be, or more of our outstanding common
stock.
The shareholder rights plan may make it
more difficult for other persons or entities, without the approval of our board of directors, to make a tender offer or otherwise acquire substantial
amounts of our common stock, or to launch other takeover attempts that a shareholder might consider to be in such shareholders best interests.
The shareholder rights plan also may limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common
stock.
26
PROPOSAL 1: APPROVAL OF PLAN OF
DISSOLUTION
General
At the special meeting, you will be
asked to approve the voluntary dissolution and liquidation of the Company pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution. The Plan of Dissolution was approved by
our board of directors, subject to shareholder approval, on December 4, 2008. A copy of the Plan of Dissolution is attached as Annex A to this
proxy statement and incorporated herein by reference. Certain material features of the Plan of Dissolution are summarized below, including a summary of
the Plan of Dissolution beginning on page 38. You are urged to carefully read the Plan of Dissolution in its entirety.
Background and Reasons for the Proposed Dissolution and
Liquidation
Sale of Harpin Protein Technology
Prior to February 28, 2007, we were a
plant technology company that marketed a line of products based on our proprietary harpin protein technology and manufacturing process. These products
were used in agricultural and horticultural production, with more limited use in the Home and Garden Market, to enhance plant health and improve
overall plant production and output quality. We developed, manufactured and commercialized Messenger, which contained our first generation protein,
harpinEA; Messenger STS, an improved formulation of Messenger; employ and MightyPlant, a line of products designed specifically for the plant
nutrition market; N-Hibit, a seed treatment designed to reduce nematode damage in large acreage crops; and ProAct, a product designed to enhance
yield in row crops.
On February 28, 2007, we completed the
sale of our proprietary harpin protein technology and substantially all of the assets related to our worldwide agricultural and horticultural markets
to Plant Health Care, Inc. pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated as of December 1, 2006, or the Asset Purchase Agreement.
Our board of directors approved the sale on December 1, 2006 and our shareholders approved the sale at a special meeting held on February 26, 2007.
Under the terms of the sale, Plant Health Care purchased substantially all of our assets and other rights relating to the creation of plant health
technology incorporating harpin proteins and the manufacture of biopesticide, plant health and nutrient products utilizing harpin protein technology.
These assets included our core harpin protein technology, including our license agreement with the Cornell Research Foundation, our manufacturing
equipment and our entire inventory of products designated for the agricultural and horticultural markets. Plant Health Care assumed certain of our
liabilities at closing, including all of our obligations under our office and manufacturing facility lease and under our license with the Cornell
Research Foundation. The proprietary harpin protein technology and the assets sold to Plant Health Care represented approximately 90% of our total net
revenue in each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase
Agreement, we retained our cash, accounts receivable and assets relating to our Home and Garden Business, consisting primarily of our inventory of
harpin protein-based products designated for the Home and Garden Market. As part of the closing, we entered into a license and supply agreement with
Plant Health Care, pursuant to which we have the exclusive right to sell harpin protein-based products for the protection of plants and seeds and the
promotion of overall plant health to the Home and Garden Market. We retained all liabilities associated with our Home and Garden Business and all
liabilities associated with the harpin protein technology that occurred or existed prior to the closing that were not assumed by Plant Health Care. At
the time of the closing of the sale to Plant Health Care, our business strategy with respect to the Home and Garden Business was to use any revenue
generated by our Home and Garden Business to support our continued operations while we explored whether there may be opportunities to realize potential
value from our remaining business assets, primarily our net operating loss carryforwards. We did not have any intention of making substantial
investments to grow our Home and Garden Business. Given the level of investment we expected to make, we did not expect our Home and Garden Business to
grow significantly in the short-term. We retained the Home and Garden Business because we believed that retention of a portion of our ongoing business
would help us preserve, and provide revenue to support, our NOL Strategy.
The adjusted purchase price for the
harpin protein technology assets was approximately $2.2 million, $1.5 million of which we received at closing. The balance of approximately $0.7
million was evidenced by a
27
promissory note delivered to us by
Plant Health Care. The promissory note, which was paid in full by December 31, 2007, had an interest rate of 5% per annum. To date, we have used the
net proceeds of the sale of the harpin protein technology for general working capital purposes related to our Home and Garden Business and to explore
our NOL Strategy.
In connection with the approval of the
sale of our harpin protein technology, our board of directors also approved a plan to substantially reduce our administrative, marketing, sales,
manufacturing and development personnel to six employees by December 31, 2006, with the possibility of additional personnel cuts in the future. The
majority of these employees were hired by Plant Health Care in December 2006. Dr. Rhett Atkins, our then chief executive officer and president,
resigned from those positions effective December 15, 2006 as part of the reduction in force. Dr. Atkins continues to serve as one of our
directors.
Our Operations and Strategy after the Sale of Harpin
Protein Technology
As a result of the sale of our harpin
protein technology to Plant Health Care, our Home and Garden Business is the only continuing portion of our operations and has been our primary source
of revenue. Our Home and Garden Business has a limited operating history and has generated only limited revenue to date. Prior to the sale of our
harpin protein technology, our Home and Garden Business had been a secondary portion of our business. We initiated our Home and Garden Business in
2003, with the introduction of Messenger, primarily for use on roses. In 2004, we expanded our home and garden marketing plan, concentrating our
efforts in the Pacific Northwest and Northeastern regions of the United States. We increased resources allocated to the Home and Garden Market in 2005
and expanded our efforts to include the Southeastern region of the United States in our target areas. In January 2006, we introduced Messenger seed
treatment for home and garden use. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 our Home and Garden Business generated revenue of approximately
$0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. To date, sales of our Home and Garden Products have been generated primarily through
distributors and our website based on positive word-of-mouth from current users, and we have not invested significant resources in marketing or
distributing these products. We have not made, and do not intend to make, substantial additional investments in our Home and Garden Business. As of
March 2, 2009, we had only three part-time employees, one of which is dedicated to the sales and marketing of our Home and Garden Products. As
discussed in more detail below, from and after the closing of the sale of our harpin protein technology and until our board approved the Plan of
Dissolution in December 2008, our business strategy had been to use any revenue generated by our Home and Garden Business to support our continued
operations and to explore our NOL Strategy.
We have incurred significant operating
losses since our inception in 1994. As of December 31, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $127.8 million. We incurred net losses of
approximately $0.6 million, $1.0 million and $9.5 million in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of December 31, 2008,
we had accumulated approximately $118.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which expire between 2009 and
2027, and net operating loss carryforwards in 19 U.S. States that range from $2,000 to $12.6 million per state and expire between 2009 and 2027. Our
total U.S. general business credit carryforwards were approximately $1.4 million and expire between 2013 and 2026. Our total foreign tax net operating
loss carryforwards were approximately $4.3 million at December 31, 2008, of which $1.4 million expires between 2011 and 2018 and $2.9 million does not
expire. We have provided a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets because of the significant uncertainty surrounding our ability to
realize value on such assets. See Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business Plan to Utilize Net Operating Loss
Carryforwards.
Background
In order to assess our NOL Strategy,
our board of directors engaged legal professionals to validate the underlying assumptions related to our net operating loss carryforwards and to
analyze and provide advice on the options that may be available to preserve and maximize the potential use of our deferred tax assets, as well as to
provide guidance on the potential limitations and risks of such utilization strategy. Because the acquisition by any person of a significant number of
shares of our common stock would jeopardize the utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards, we engaged the law firm of Pepper Hamilton LLP in
May 2007 as special tax counsel to conduct an analysis of whether and when we had an ownership change
28
of our stock (as defined by Section
382(g) of the Code) since our inception. We refer to this analysis as the Section 382 Analysis.
On June 1, 2007, after extensive
discussion and consultation with Perkins Coie LLP, our outside legal counsel, regarding the associated terms and legal risks, our board of directors
determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to implement a shareholder rights plan. The shareholder rights plan
was designed to protect the utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards, permit our board of directors and shareholders adequate time to
evaluate the fairness of any acquisition proposal and ensure that all of our shareholders received fair and equal treatment in the event of a proposed
acquisition.
In June 2007, Boston Avenue Capital,
LLC, or BAC, a business investment firm, which, together with an affiliated entity, at that time and currently beneficially owned
and owns more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, provided a memorandum to our then-president, Bradley S. Powell, generally outlining an
investment structure designed by BAC to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards. BAC had previously contacted us in November 2006 while we were in
confidential negotiations for the sale of our proprietary harpin protein technology, to express interest in making an investment in the Company. Our
board considered BACs November 2006 expression of interest, but concluded that it was in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders
at that time to proceed with the sale of our proprietary harpin protein technology rather than explore a transaction with BAC.
At a board meeting on June 19, 2007,
representatives of BAC made a presentation to our board of directors regarding BACs proposed investment structure, including BACs
background and business experience and its ability to identify suitable acquisition targets and fund such acquisitions, the potential financing terms,
the compensation to BAC and potential benefits of pursuing an NOL Strategy. BACs proposal generally involved the Company acquiring a number of
small companies as a means of increasing our taxable income and utilizing our net operating loss carryforwards in future years. BAC is a hedge fund
with a value investing focus. BAC indicated to our board that it had experience in the steps necessary to effectuate the NOL Strategy. Our board of
directors discussed BACs proposal and requested that Mr. Powell obtain additional information from BAC, including the specific activities that
BAC planned to undertake on our behalf, the cost and timing of such activities, the conditions of BACs funding, including the terms of a
requested equity option to purchase an additional stake in Eden, appointment of a BAC representative to our board and final say over an acquisition
target, and the specific benefits that BAC expected would accrue to us and our shareholders pursuant to BACs proposed investment structure. At
that same meeting, our board of directors discussed with Mr. Powell the draft Section 382 Analysis prepared by Pepper Hamilton. The draft analysis
indicated that the Company has experienced ownership changes (as defined under Section 382 of the Code) on March 20, 1996, in connection with the sale
of our Series C preferred stock, and October 2, 2000, in connection with the consummation of our initial public offering. Mr. Powell noted that, absent
any other ownership changes in the future, he did not expect the Section 382 ownership changes to limit our future use of the U.S. net operating loss
carryforwards generated prior to such ownership changes.
At a meeting on August 3, 2007, our
board of directors reviewed a letter of intent delivered by Value Fund Advisors, LLC, or VFA, an investment manager and the general
manager of BAC, in response to Mr. Powells follow-up inquiry regarding BACs proposed investment structure. Due to its status as general
manager of BAC, at the time it submitted the letter of intent and currently VFA beneficially owned and owns more than 10% of our outstanding common
stock. In addition to the proposed investment structure, the letter of intent also proposed that VFA would provide investment banking services to us
for the purposes of identifying acquisition candidates. After discussion of VFAs letter of intent, our board determined that the proposed
investment structure was not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders because it potentially jeopardized the utilization of our net
operating loss carryforwards and determined not to engage VFA as our financial advisor. In particular, our board was concerned that VFAs proposal
was founded on a strategy of the Company acquiring a number of small companies over time, rather than a larger, highly profitable company, and that the
equity proposed to be issued to acquisition candidates and the financing proposed to be provided by VFA to fund an acquisition would potentially run
afoul of Section 382 of the Code, thereby possibly reducing, eliminating or deferring the use of our net operating loss carryforwards. Our board
concluded that this strategy likely would not increase revenues and generate new income sufficient in future years to enable the Company to utilize the
net operating loss carryforwards before they expire and in a time period that would maximize their value. Further, our board was concerned that (i) the
costs associated
29
with acquiring a number of small
companies over time, which would likely exceed the costs of acquiring a larger company, could potentially exhaust our financial resources before any
benefit related to the utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards could be realized, (ii) the integration of multiple, small companies over
time would be difficult to manage, (iii) the smaller companies were seeking equity in our company as part of the acquisition, which could either cause
us to run afoul of Section 382 of the Code or make it difficult for us to manage our net operating loss carryforwards, and (iv) the acquisition of
smaller companies would yield smaller net operating loss carryforward benefits as opposed to the acquisition of a larger, more profitable company.
Although our board of directors determined not to pursue the investment proposal set forth by VFA or engage VFA as our financial advisor, our board
encouraged VFA to continue to work with our board to identify potential acquisition targets and otherwise continue to participate in our boards
efforts to successfully effectuate the NOL Strategy. Mr. Powell and our board further discussed the Section 382 Analysis. Mr. Powell noted that sales
in our Home and Garden Business were significantly lower than expected for the year. Our board discussed strategies for improving operating performance
of our Home and Garden Business without making substantial investment in the business.
In late August 2007, after discussions
with other potential financial advisors, including VFA as noted above, the Company engaged Stephens Inc., or Stephens, as our
exclusive financial advisor in connection with our efforts to enter into one or more business combinations to effectuate the NOL Strategy. Our board
ultimately chose Stephens due to its experience of working with mid-size and smaller companies and because our board felt that Stephens understood the
constraints imposed by Section 382 of the Code on any business combination involving the Company and had the resources and talent to identify potential
acquisition candidates. Stephens is a full-service, privately-owned investment bank experienced in providing advice in connection with mergers and
acquisitions and related transactions.
The engagement letter with Stephens
provided that the engagement could be terminated at any time after December 31, 2007 by either party upon 30 days prior written notice. As compensation
for Stephenss services, we agreed to pay Stephens (i) a non-refundable $100,000 retainer, (ii) a $300,000 fairness opinion fee, and an additional
$75,000 fee for each additional opinion with respect to amended or revised offers, (iii) a fee, generally payable on the closing date of a business
combination, or the Success Fee, and (iv) a fee equal to 15% of the sum of (A) the amount of any break-up fee, topping fee or
similar fee paid to the Company plus (B) the value of any option to purchase any securities or assets of any acquisition candidate (or any payment made
to the Company in respect thereof). The Success Fee entitled Stephens to between 1.0% and 2.0% of the transaction value for a given transaction, with a
minimum Success Fee of $750,000. The Success Fee could be reduced by the amount of any fairness opinion fees previously paid, and by 20% of the amount
otherwise payable, but not less than the minimum Success Fee, if a business combination were completed with certain parties introduced to the Company
by VFA or its affiliates. The Success Fee was payable to Stephens only if a business combination was consummated during the term of Stephenss
engagement or if the Company entered into an agreement during the term of Stephenss engagement, or within 18 months after the termination of
Stephenss engagement, providing for a business combination with any entity identified on a list prepared by Stephens that had contacted the
Company during Stephenss engagement (whether or not contacted by Stephens) and other entities contacted by Stephens in connection with its
engagement, and such business combination was subsequently consummated. In the event that the Company raised capital in connection with a business
combination transaction, Stephens would be offered the leading role as underwriter or placement agent and would be entitled to certain fees depending
on the type of transaction.
For the services provided, we paid to
Stephens only the non-refundable $100,000 retainer. We also reimbursed Stephens for their reasonable expenses totaling approximately $5,000. Stephens
never rendered a formal written report, opinion or appraisal with respect to the proposed transactions with Company B or Company C (as discussed
below), the dissolution and liquidation of the Company pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution as compared against the NOL Strategy, or any other
strategies considered by our board of directors. However, based on a preliminary review of Companies B and C and their respective financial
information, Stephens did provide an informal oral recommendation to our board that Company B would be an attractive acquisition candidate and an
informal oral recommendation to certain 5% or greater shareholders of the Company that Company C would be an attractive acquisition candidate. In
providing these recommendations, Stephens reviewed information provided by each of Companies B and C and their respective management teams and bankers,
discussed the companies business, prospects and financial information with their respective bankers
30
and management teams and created pro forma financial models. Stephens provided its
informal oral recommendation to our board regarding Company B because Stephens believed that Company B presented an opportunity for us to acquire a
company with growth prospects based on an existing customer base at an acceptable purchase price (as a multiple of cash flow) which had the potential
to enable us to generate profit in the future sufficient to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards within a reasonable time period. Further,
Stephens believed that an acquisition of Company B had the potential to generate favorable returns on invested capital with minimal ongoing capital
requirements. Stephens provided an informal oral recommendation to certain 5% or greater shareholders of the Company regarding Company C because
Stephens believed that Company C presented an opportunity for us to acquire a company with favorable growth prospects based on an existing customer
base and good market position that would enable us to potentially utilize a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards. However, as both of the
proposed transactions failed to proceed due primarily to the unavailability of adequate financing, there was never a definitive transaction for
Stephens to present to our board and provide a formal recommendation, report, opinion or appraisal. Stephens did not provide any verbal
recommendations, reports, opinions or appraisals to our board regarding any of the proposed acquisitions brought forth by VFA, either before
Stephens engagement in August 2007 or thereafter, or with respect to the Plan of Dissolution.
Prior to its engagement as financial
advisor in connection with our NOL Strategy, Stephens and its affiliates had, from time to time, provided financial services to the Company for which
it has received compensation. As of March 23, 2009, affiliates of Stephens beneficially owned approximately 19.8% of our common stock. These affiliates
include: SF Holding Corp. (formerly Stephens Group, Inc.), for which the chief executive officer and president of Stephens is the co-chairman; Stephens
EBC, LLC, of which SF Holding Corp. is the sole managing member; and the president and chief executive officer of Stephens. As of March 23,
2009, SF Holding Corp. and Stephens EBC, LLC collectively beneficially owned approximately 16.6% of our outstanding common stock, all of which
have been contributed to a voting trust, and the other affiliates of Stephens beneficially owned approximately 3.2% of our common stock. Stephens does
not have voting or investment power over any of the shares held by its affiliates. From 1963 until his retirement in October 2003, Jon Jacoby, one of
our directors, worked in various capacities with Stephens and SF Holding Corp. and served as a director of SF Holding Corp. until November 2006. See
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The engagement of Stephens was approved by the disinterested
directors of the Company.
On September 12, 2007, we received a
Staff Deficiency Letter from the Nasdaq Stock Market notifying us that we were not in compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement for
continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market. The letter advised that we would be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market if we did not regain
compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by March 10, 2008. This letter was the fourth time in approximately two years that we were not in
compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement and faced possible delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market.
After discussions with Mr. Powell and
certain board members, in September 2007, Stephens, on behalf of the Company, submitted to Company B, a designer, manufacturer and operator of
electronic gaming machines, a written indication of our interest in acquiring all of its assets and operating liabilities. Company B was a profitable
company that we believed might provide us with the opportunity to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards within a reasonable time period. We
intended to fund the proposed acquisition through cash on hand and a combination of equity and debt financing. The indication of interest was subject
to a number of conditions, including completion of due diligence, negotiation of final terms of the transaction, execution of definitive agreements,
completion of debt financings to pay a portion of the acquisition price and approvals of our board and shareholders. The transaction did not proceed,
however, because (i) the expected source of equity financing did not accept the terms of the preferred equity that we sought to issue in the
transaction citing concerns related to the preferred valuation, tax and legal risks associated with the structure of the transaction, and (ii) no other
sources of equity funding could be found. To bridge the short fall in financing, Stephens, on behalf of the Company, explored the possibility of
securing additional high-yield debt financing. However, adverse conditions in the credit markets in the third and fourth quarters of 2007 did not make
this a viable alternative. Debt financing markets became extremely challenging in the third and fourth quarters of 2007 due to the growing backlog of
underwritten leveraged financed deals. As demand for high-yield and highly leveraged transactions diminished, the cost of financing increased and terms
became more onerous, impairing the Companys ability to obtain needed financing.
31
At a board meeting on November 6, 2007,
representatives of Stephens updated our board of directors on the activities undertaken by Stephens to identify and contact potential acquisition
candidates, including Company B, and potential providers of debt and equity financing for any such acquisition. Stephens provided additional updates to
our directors at board meetings held on January 15, 2008, February 12, 2008, March 19, 2008, May 6, 2008, July 31, 2008 and September 17, 2008. At each
meeting, Stephens briefed our board on the activities undertaken by Stephens to identify and contact potential acquisition candidates and the
challenges of obtaining financing for mergers and acquisitions, including the worsening conditions in the high-yield debt market, which we believed, on
the advice of Stephens, to be the most likely source of financing to fund an acquisition. Over the course of these meetings, representatives of
Stephens reviewed feedback received from potential acquisition targets, including the hesitancy of some to becoming public companies. Stephens also
explored the possibility of obtaining capital investment from existing holders owning 5% or more of our outstanding common stock as a potential means
to facilitate the completion of a transaction and avoid a change of ownership that would limit our net operating loss carryforwards under Section 382
of the Code. At each meeting, our board of directors discussed the information provided by Stephens. Our board ultimately concluded not to pursue a
transaction with any of the potential acquisition targets identified by Stephens, other than Company C as discussed below, due to the lack of adequate
financing sources to consummate the transactions and the likely inability of the potential targets to generate sufficient revenue and taxable income to
maximize the utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards within a reasonable period of time. At these meetings, Mr. Powell also provided our
board of directors with updates on our Home and Garden Business, which was generally experiencing continued declines in revenues resulting in continued
operating losses.
On February 20, 2008, our board of
directors unanimously approved a one-for-three reverse stock split in order to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for continued
listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market. The reverse stock split became effective on February 22, 2008.
At a meeting on March 19, 2008, Perkins
Coie generally discussed fiduciary duties of directors under Washington law and, at our boards request, specifically addressed issues arising
with respect to our boards determination of whether to continue to pursue the NOL Strategy. At that meeting and at each meeting thereafter
through the September 17, 2008 meeting, our board evaluated whether the continuation of the NOL Strategy was, in light of the information presented by
Stephens, management and other board advisors, in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and determined that it was advisable to
continue the NOL Strategy and its exclusive arrangement with Stephens.
After discussions with Mr. Powell and
certain board members, in September 2008, Stephens, on behalf of the Company, submitted to Company C a written indication of our interest in acquiring
the assets of Company C, an online credit reporting agency. The Company initially intended to fund the proposed acquisition through cash on hand and a
combination of equity and debt financing, including an equity investment by the holders of 5% or more of the Companys outstanding common stock.
The indication of interest was subject to a number of conditions, including completion of due diligence, negotiation of final terms, execution of
definitive agreements, completion of debt and equity financings to pay the acquisition price and approvals of our board and shareholders. We conducted
preliminary diligence on, and held telephonic meetings with management of, Company C.
At a board meeting on September 17,
2008, as part of its regular board update, Stephens led a discussion of two specific acquisition candidates, including Company C, and the increasing
difficulties in obtaining financing for mergers and acquisitions. Stephens noted that the high-yield debt market essentially had shut down, and the
issuance of high-yield bonds in June, July and August 2008 were at their lowest levels in 14 years. Stephens had previously indicated to the board that
due to the inactive debt markets, we would need to seek out more equity financing for any transaction, including a transaction with Company C. After
discussion, our board of directors agreed that it should continue to investigate an opportunity with Company C. However, our board of directors
determined that if we were unable to make significant progress toward financing and completing this or another acquisition within a short period of
time, it would begin to explore other alternatives to the NOL Strategy, including winding up the Companys operations and distributing any
remaining assets to its shareholders. Our board of directors instructed Stephens to obtain additional information regarding the availability of
financing.
32
On September 8, 2008, Mr. Powell
announced his resignation from the Company, effective September 30, 2008, in order to pursue another career opportunity. On September 17, 2008, our
board appointed Nathaniel T. Brown as our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and secretary.
At a board meeting on November 6, 2008,
representatives of Stephens updated our board of directors on the discussions with Company C and provided an overview of possible third party financing
sources. Stephens and management met with representatives of Company C telephonically, but were unable to arrange a face-to-face meeting due to the
fact that our bid price did not satisfy Company Cs requirements. Stephens also reported on its discussions to determine whether the holders of 5%
or more of the Companys common stock were possible sources of equity financing for the acquisition of Company Cs assets. Stephens noted
that none of the shareholders was interested in investing in the transaction. Our board discussed with Stephens the advantages and disadvantages of
pursuing the proposed acquisition on the pricing terms presented to our board. Ultimately, our board concluded that a transaction with Company C was
not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders based primarily on the unavailability of adequate financing for the transaction. Because
of the unavailability of adequate financing, our board never reviewed definitive transaction terms. Without such a review, our board did not make a
determination as to whether a transaction with Company C would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. At that meeting, our board
also discussed a proposed sale of the public corporate shell or a voluntary dissolution of the Company as strategic alternatives to the NOL Strategy,
and reviewed legal information provided by Perkins Coie. Our board instructed Mr. Brown to work with Perkins Coie to explore further each of these
alternatives. Mr. Brown noted that sales in our Home and Garden Business were very slow, due in part to the seasonality of the business and minimal
product marketing and advertising efforts.
At a board meeting on November 20,
2008, representatives of Perkins Coie provided an overview of legal considerations relating to the strategic alternatives available to our board of
directors with respect to our future operations. The alternatives addressed were (i) continuation of the NOL Strategy, (ii) a sale of the public
corporate shell in connection with a reverse merger, and (iii) a statutory dissolution of the Company and distribution of its assets under Washington
law. Representatives of Perkins Coie discussed, and answered questions from our board of directors related to, the legal benefits and risks and the
potential timing and costs associated with each alternative. Our board was advised that, on November 10, 2008, a family member of one of the directors
had made a very general inquiry regarding a possible purchase of the public corporate shell, and of the potential conflicts of interest associated with
such a transaction. After discussion of the legal issues related to the sale of the public corporate shell, our board concluded that this general
strategy, whether with a third party or a potential related party, was not advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders due
to the legal risks, lack of perceived value to the Company and its shareholders and costs associated with such a transaction. After discussing the
other strategic alternatives, our board concluded that a statutory dissolution was the preferred strategy among the alternatives discussed at the
meeting and instructed Perkins Coie to prepare a formal plan of dissolution to be discussed and considered for adoption at a subsequent board
meeting.
At its meeting on December 4, 2008, our
board, with legal input from Perkins Coie, continued its earlier discussion of the voluntary dissolution of the Company. Perkins Coie provided an
overview of the voluntary dissolution process under Washington law and reviewed with our board a draft Plan of Dissolution delivered to each board
member for review in advance of the meeting. Throughout this discussion, Perkins Coie responded to director questions on legal matters. After
discussion of the legal benefits and risks and the potential timing and costs of each of the strategic options available to the Company and, upon
consideration of the Companys financial situation, business prospects, and continued inability to effectuate the NOL Strategy and the continued
distress in the capital markets, our board determined that the voluntary dissolution and liquidation and winding up of the Company under Washington law
is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, approved the Plan of Dissolution and recommended the Plan of Dissolution
for approval of the shareholders.
On December 5, 2008, we issued a press
release announcing that our board of directors had approved the Plan of Dissolution. On December 5, 2008, a representative of VFA separately contacted
Mr. Brown and Stephens requesting that the Company not abandon the NOL Strategy. Mr. Brown requested that VFA provide its specific written proposal for
consideration and review by Stephens and the Companys legal advisors.
33
On December 9, 2008, a representative
of VFA submitted a brief outline setting out the general structure of a proposed alternative to liquidation that he asserted would enable the Company
to continue the NOL Strategy, but did not provide any details regarding potential acquisition candidates, the terms of any such acquisition, analysis
of legal and tax issues or precedent transactions. On December 10, 2008, VFA submitted a slightly more detailed outline of the general structure, which
included our board issuing a dividend to our shareholders consisting of most of our existing cash, the appointment of a new board of directors led by
individuals acceptable to VFA and to our existing board, the creation of a new class of preferred stock paying a 20% premium in cash or in additional
shares, an acquisition acceptable to the new board and VFA, the sale of the preferred stock to VFA in order to fund the acquisition, the payment of
dividends on our preferred and common stock and the Company ceasing to be a public reporting company. This outline similarly did not provide
significant additional information regarding potential acquisition candidates, the terms of any such acquisition, analysis of legal and tax issues,
precedent transactions and other critical business, financial and legal matters.
By telephone conference on December 12,
2008, Mr. Brown, a representative of Stephens, and attorneys from Pepper Hamilton and Perkins Coie discussed and reviewed the materials presented by
VFA to determine whether the structure outlined would enable the Company to successfully implement the NOL Strategy. The general conclusion was that
the proposed structure created legal risk that the IRS would ultimately determine that the proposed structure does not comply with Section 382 of the
Code and, from a tax standpoint, based on all surrounding circumstances, likely would not enable the Company to successfully implement the NOL
Strategy. On December 18, 2008, Mr. Brown, an attorney from Pepper Hamilton and a representative of VFA discussed the structure outlined by VFA. The
attorney at Pepper Hamilton concluded that the structure proposed by VFA, along with variations of such structure raised by the representative of VFA,
created legal risk that the IRS would find that the proposed structure does not comply with Section 382 of the Code and would not support successful
implementation of the NOL Strategy.
At a board meeting on December 19,
2008, our board reviewed and discussed VFAs proposed structure with representatives of Stephens and attorneys from Pepper Hamilton and Perkins
Coie present. During the discussion, the outside advisors responded to questions from the directors. The attorney from Pepper Hamilton reviewed the
structure with our board and noted her opinion that the proposed structure would jeopardize the Companys ability to utilize its net operating
loss carryforwards and create legal risk for the Company that the IRS would ultimately determine that the proposed structure does not comply with
Section 382 of the Code. In addition to not providing any details on potential acquisition candidates or the proposed structure, VFA did not provide
any tax or legal analyses to our board showing that the proposed structure would be acceptable to the IRS. Accordingly, our board was faced with the
risk of committing additional time and potentially exhausting all of our resources to pursue a strategy that our advisors believed may violate Section
382 of the Code and result in the denial or limitation of our net operating loss carryforwards and that may potentially leave our shareholders with
nothing or proceeding with the previously announced Plan of Dissolution, pursuant to which we expect to provide liquidating distributions to
shareholders over time. Our board, based on the advice of legal counsel and input from Stephens, reaffirmed its earlier determination that voluntary
dissolution of the Company is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Our board, however, noted that it would continue
to consider, with the advice of its experts, any detailed proposals accompanied by well-reasoned tax and legal analyses, setting out a specific plan
that would successfully maximize the use of the Companys net operating loss carryforwards in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders.
Reasons for the Plan of Dissolution
Our board of directors is recommending
approval of the Plan of Dissolution because it believes that the voluntary dissolution and liquidation of the Company is advisable and in the best
interests of the Company and its shareholders. Our board of directors has considered at length, with the assistance of legal and financial advisors,
the NOL Strategy. In its role as our exclusive financial advisor, Stephens contacted by telephone 34 potential acquisition targets and eight financial
sponsors. Ten of these potential acquisition targets were presented to Stephens and/or the Company by VFA or its affiliates. Of these 34 potential
acquisition targets and eight financial sponsors, Stephens (i) conducted detailed financial analyses on 18 potential acquisition targets and one
financial sponsor, (ii) met with representatives of eleven potential acquisition targets and three financial sponsors, (iii) entered into four
confidentiality agreements and (iv) submitted two indications of interest on our behalf.
34
In determining the potential
acquisition candidates to approach, Stephens sought companies with strong management teams operating in attractive markets that presented growth
opportunities without the infusion of significant capital. Stephens also focused on companies that generated sufficient amounts of pre-tax income such
that the acquisition would enable us to utilize all or a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards in a relatively short period of time and
thereby fully realize their value. A major consideration for identifying potential candidates was whether Stephens thought we could finance the
acquisition based on our existing cash position and the availability of third-party financing sources. Stephens also vetted potential acquisition
candidates presented to us by VFA and its affiliates, none of which satisfied our criteria. Once identified, detailed conversations regarding the
potential acquisition candidate were held internally at Stephens and between representatives of Stephens and our chief executive officer. Stephens
conducted detailed financial analyses on candidates for which financial information was available and presented these analyses to our chief executive
officer who would then determine whether to pursue such acquisition candidates. Stephens would contact identified candidates or their representatives
and, if there was mutual interest, further discussions were held, including in some instances face-to-face meetings among our chief executive officer,
Stephens and representatives of the candidate. In the majority of cases, either the acquisition candidate did not satisfy our criteria or we did not
satisfy the acquisition candidates criteria. If both parties were interested in a possible transaction, a confidentiality agreement was entered
into and, with respect to Company B and Company C, indications of interest were executed and presented to our board of directors for
consideration.
Stephens also contacted financial
sponsors to discuss facilitating a transaction with one of their portfolio companies. These financial sponsors included private equity and investment
groups, including VFA. In contacting financial sponsors, Stephens generally sought out private equity firms and other entities that had experience
evaluating net operating loss carryforwards and/or had consummated transactions utilizing net operating loss carryforwards in the past. While certain
of the financial sponsors had general interest, after further discussions, these financial sponsors determined not to pursue a transaction with us for
various reasons, including that our net operating loss carryforward was not large enough, concern regarding our charter protections, perceived issues
as to the validity of our net operating loss carryforward and that they did not want to give up a large portion of the equity upside, which was a key
requirement for any transaction. We did not receive any offers from potential acquisition candidates or financial sponsors, including VFA, in which we
were interested or that otherwise satisfied our criteria.
Despite its efforts, our board did not
identify any potential business combinations that it deemed to be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. During the
course of the process for effectuating the NOL Strategy, our board, with the input of Stephens, concluded that we needed to acquire a highly profitable
business, or one that would become highly profitable over a relatively short period of time, in order to fully realize the value of our net operating
loss carryforwards. A strategy focused on acquiring a series of small businesses that generated minimal or moderate amounts of profit, or that expected
to generate profits over a longer time frame, likely would not increase our revenues and generate new income sufficient in future years to enable us to
utilize our net operating loss carryforwards before they expire or in a manner that maximized their value. In addition, due to limitations on change of
ownership set forth in Section 382 of the Code, we are limited in how we can finance any potential business combination, including restrictions on the
amount of equity that we can issue in connection with any transaction. In light of recent and current economic conditions, including the lack of
financing opportunities in the high-yield debt market, finding a profitable business and obtaining sufficient financing to enable us to acquire a
highly profitable business on terms that did not otherwise jeopardize our net operating loss carryforwards became extremely difficult. In fact, the
credit markets were deteriorating faster than the prices being sought for acquisition candidates, thereby widening the gap between the financial
resources available to us and the asking prices for acquisition candidates. During this same time, we continued to incur operating losses from our Home
and Garden Business.
After discussion of the benefits and
risks and the potential timing and costs of its strategic options and upon consideration of the Companys financial situation, business prospects,
and continued inability to effectuate the NOL Strategy and the continued distress in the capital markets, our board determined that voluntary
dissolution and liquidation and winding up of the Company under Washington law is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders, approved the Plan of Dissolution and recommended the Plan of Dissolution for approval of the shareholders. No member of our board
dissented during the
35
deliberative process with respect
to any of our decisions regarding strategic alternatives to the Plan of Dissolution. In arriving at its determination that the Plan of Dissolution is
the preferred strategic option that best serves the interests of the Company and its shareholders, our board of directors carefully considered the
terms of the Plan of Dissolution, as well as the alternatives, including the possibility of the sale of the public corporate shell and the continuation
of the NOL Strategy. As part of this process, our board considered the risks and timing of each alternative, as well as managements financial
projections, information provided by Stephens and the advice of our legal advisors. In approving the Plan of Dissolution, our board considered the
factors set out above, as well as the following factors:
|
|
even if we were able to complete a business combination
transaction in furtherance of the NOL Strategy, the risk that we may be unable to realize the benefit of our net operating loss carryforwards,
including the risk that the IRS or some other taxing authority may disagree with our position regarding ownership changes under Section 382 of the Code
thereby severely limiting the availability of our net operating loss carryforwards; |
|
|
the limitations placed on the amount of equity we may issue to
provide capital for our business, or to secure financing necessary to acquire a profitable business, due to the ownership changes rules set forth in
Section 382 of the Code; |
|
|
the uncertainty as to whether we would be able to generate
sufficient taxable income to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards; |
|
|
that we had vigorously explored strategic alternatives,
including undertaking extensive efforts to find a business combination that would enable us to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, as
described above, and none was successful; |
|
|
the volatility in the credit markets and the effect of such
volatility on our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms for the continued operation of our business and to acquire a profitable business in
connection with our NOL Strategy; |
|
|
the low probability that we would be presented with or otherwise
identify, within a reasonable period of time under current circumstances, any viable opportunities to engage in an attractive alternative
transaction; |
|
|
our ability to survive as an independent entity given our
history of operating losses and our expectations of continued operating losses; |
|
|
the substantial accounting, legal and other expenses associated
with being a small publicly-traded company in light of our existing and expected revenues; |
|
|
the uncertain prospects of our Home and Garden Business, its
continued net losses and its ability to generate sufficient revenues to enable us to continue pursuing the NOL Strategy or other strategic
alternatives; |
|
|
our boards belief that liquidation and distribution of our
net assets to our shareholders could produce more value than if our shareholders continued to hold their shares, given that, on and prior to the date
of our boards approval of the Plan of Dissolution, the estimated per share value of our assets in excess of estimated liabilities, claims and
expenses of liquidation exceeded the market price of our outstanding common stock; |
|
|
the terms and conditions of the Plan of Dissolution, including
the provisions that permit our board to revoke the plan prior to, or at any time until 120 days after, the Effective Date if our board determines that,
in light of new proposals presented or changes in circumstances, dissolution and liquidation are no longer advisable and in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders; |
|
|
the fact that Washington corporate law requires that the Plan of
Dissolution be approved by the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote, which ensures that our
board will not be taking actions of which a significant portion of our shareholders disapprove; |
36
|
|
the fact that approval of the Plan of Dissolution by the
requisite vote of our shareholders authorizes our board of directors and officers to implement the Plan of Dissolution without further shareholder
approval; |
|
|
the fact that shareholders are not entitled to assert
dissenters rights with respect to the Plan of Dissolution under Chapter 23B.13 of the WBCA; |
|
|
the uncertainty of the timing, nature and amount of any
liquidating distributions to shareholders; |
|
|
the risks associated with the sale of our remaining non-cash
assets, consisting primarily of our Home and Garden Business, as part of the Plan of Dissolution, including that we might have received more for such
assets if we sold them other than in liquidation; |
|
|
that shareholders would lose the opportunity to capitalize on
the potential business opportunities and possible future growth of the Company had we elected to continue to pursue the acquisition of a profitable
business as part of the NOL Strategy; |
|
|
the risk that, under Washington law, our shareholders may be
required to return to creditors some or all of the liquidating distributions; |
|
|
the fact that, if the Plan of Dissolution is approved,
shareholders would generally not be permitted to transfer shares of our common stock after the Effective Date; and |
|
|
the risk that our common stock might in the near future be
delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market for failure to satisfy continued listing standards, including the minimum bid price requirement, thereby
significantly limiting our shareholders ability to sell their stock. |
Our board of directors also considered
the factors described in the section entitled Risk Factors in this proxy statement in deciding to approve, and unanimously
recommending that our shareholders approve, the Plan of Dissolution.
In view of the variety of factors
considered in connection with its evaluation of the Plan of Dissolution, our board of directors did not find it practical to, and did not quantify or
otherwise attempt to assign relative weight to the specific factors considered in reaching its conclusions. In addition, our board did not undertake to
make any specific determination as to whether any particular factor, or any aspect of any particular factor, was favorable or unfavorable to its
ultimate determination, but rather conducted an overall analysis of the factors described above. In considering the factors described above, individual
members of our board may have given different weight to different factors.
We cannot offer any assurance that the
liquidation value per share of our common stock will equal or exceed the price or prices at which such shares recently have traded or could trade in
the future. However, our board of directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to distribute to the
shareholders our net assets pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution. If the Plan of Dissolution is not approved by our shareholders, our board of directors
will explore what, if any, alternatives are available for the future of the Company, particularly in light of the fact that our Home and Garden
Business continues to incur net losses and is expected to do so for the foreseeable future. Possible alternatives include continued exploration of the
NOL Strategy, seeking to raise capital from the sale of securities, which could result in substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and the
granting of superior rights to the new shareholders, selling all of our stock or assets, changing our business focus, expanding the scope of our
business through relationships with third parties, seeking voluntary dissolution at a later time and with potentially diminished assets or seeking
bankruptcy protection. At this time, our board does not know which alternatives might be considered, or what impact any alternative might have on
shareholder value. If our shareholders do not approve the Plan of Dissolution and we continue to operate our Home and Garden Business, we expect that
our cash resources will continue to diminish. Considering our recent financial performance and the volatility of the capital markets, it is unlikely
that we would be able to obtain additional equity or debt financing. If we were unable to obtain sufficient capital, we would eventually deplete our
available resources and could be required to discontinue operations, which could impair our ability to pursue the NOL Strategy or other alternatives to
realize value for our shareholders. See Risk Factors Risks Related to the Plan of Dissolution.
37
Dissolution Under Washington Law
Washington law provides that a
corporation may dissolve upon approval and recommendation by the board of directors of the corporation, followed by the approval of its shareholders.
Following such approval, the dissolution is effected by filing articles of dissolution with the Secretary of State. The Effective Date is the date on
which the articles of dissolution are filed with the Secretary of State or any later date specified in the articles of dissolution.
Section 23B.14.050 of the WBCA provides
that once a corporation is dissolved, it continues its corporate existence but may not carry on any business except that appropriate to wind up and
liquidate its business and affairs. The process of winding up includes:
|
|
the publication of a notice of dissolution that requests persons
with claims against the corporation to present them in accordance with the notice; |
|
|
the collection of assets and the disposal of properties that
will be applied toward the satisfaction or making reasonable provision for the satisfaction of liabilities or will not otherwise be distributed in kind
to the corporations shareholders; |
|
|
the satisfaction or making reasonable provision for satisfaction
of liabilities; |
|
|
subject to statutory limitations, the distribution of any
remaining assets to the shareholders of the corporation; and |
|
|
the taking of all other actions necessary to wind up and
liquidate the corporations business and affairs. |
Principal Provisions of the Plan of
Dissolution
This section of the proxy statement
describes material aspects of the proposed Plan of Dissolution. While we believe that the description covers the material terms of the Plan of
Dissolution, this summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should carefully read this entire proxy statement,
including the Plan of Dissolution attached as Annex A to this proxy statement, and the document delivered with and incorporated by reference
into this proxy statement for a more complete understanding of the Plan of Dissolution.
Approval of Plan of Dissolution
The Plan of Dissolution must be
approved by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our common stock. The approval of the Plan of Dissolution by the
requisite vote of the holders of our common stock will constitute adoption of the Plan of Dissolution and a grant of full and complete authority for
our board of directors and officers, without further shareholder action, to proceed with the dissolution and liquidation of the Company in accordance
with any applicable provision of the WBCA, including the authority to dispose of our Home and Garden Business and all of the other remaining non-cash
assets of the Company.
Dissolution and Liquidation
If the Plan of Dissolution is approved
by the requisite vote of our shareholders, the steps set forth below will be completed at such times as our board of directors, in its discretion,
deems necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Our board of directors may instruct the officers
of the Company to delay the taking of any of the following steps until the Company has performed such actions as our board of directors or such
officers determine to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to maximize the value of the Companys assets upon
liquidation:
|
|
the filing of articles of dissolution of the Company with the
Secretary of State to establish the Effective Date of dissolution; |
|
|
the publication of notice of the Companys dissolution in a
newspaper of general circulation in King County, Washington, within 30 days after the Effective Date, which notice must be published once a week for
three consecutive weeks; |
38
|
|
the mailing of written notice of the Companys dissolution
to the holders of known claims at any time after the publication of the notice set forth in the preceding bullet; |
|
|
the cessation of all of the Companys business activities
and the withdrawal of the Company from any jurisdiction in which it is qualified to do business, except as necessary for the sale or other disposition
of its property and assets or for the proper winding up and liquidation of the Companys business and affairs; |
|
|
the collection and disposal of the Companys properties and
assets that will be applied toward satisfaction or making reasonable provision for satisfaction of the Companys liabilities, in all cases subject
to applicable liens and security interests and applicable contractual restrictions; |
|
|
the negotiation and consummation of sales or other dispositions
of our Home and Garden Business and other non-cash assets of the Company, including the assumption by the purchaser of liabilities of the Company, upon
such terms as our board of directors may deem in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders; |
|
|
as determined by our board of directors, the prosecution,
defense, settlement or other resolution of any and all claims or suits by or against the Company and the satisfaction of or the making of reasonable
provision for the satisfaction of liabilities of the Company by means of insurance coverage, provision of security therefor, contractual assumptions
thereof by a solvent person or any other means that our board of directors determines is reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction of the
reasonably estimated amount of such liabilities. Upon making such determination, our board of directors will, for purposes of determining whether a
subsequent distribution to shareholders is prohibited under the WBCA, be entitled to treat such liabilities as fully satisfied by the assets used or
committed in order to make such provision; |
|
|
if our board of directors deems it in the best interests of the
Company and its shareholders, (i) petitioning to have the dissolution continued under court supervision in accordance with the WBCA or, to the extent
permissible under the WBCA, dedicate the Companys property and assets to the repayment of its creditors by making an assignment for the benefit
of creditors or obtain the appointment of a general receiver or (ii) filing an application pursuant to the WBCA for a court determination of (a) the
amount and form of reasonable provision to be made for satisfaction of any claims or liabilities that have arisen or that are reasonably likely to
arise within the survival period specified in the WBCA or (b) whether the provision made or proposed to be made by our board of directors for the
satisfaction of any one or more claims or liabilities is reasonable; |
|
|
subject to the limitations on distributions set forth in the
WBCA, the distribution of the remaining funds of the Company and the distribution of the remaining unsold assets of the Company, if any, to its
shareholders; and |
|
|
the taking of any and all other actions permitted or required by
the WBCA and any other applicable laws and regulations, including federal tax and securities laws and regulations and the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules and
regulations, in connection with the winding up and liquidation of the Company. |
Authority of Officers and
Directors
After the Effective Date, our board of
directors and officers will continue in their positions for the purpose of winding up the business and affairs of the Company. Our board of directors
may appoint officers, hire employees and retain independent contractors in connection with the winding up process, and is authorized to pay to the
Companys officers, directors, employees and independent contractors compensation above their regular compensation in recognition of the
extraordinary efforts they may be required to undertake in connection with the successful implementation of the Plan of Dissolution. Any such
compensation must be fair and reasonable with respect to the efforts expended. Approval of the Plan of Dissolution by the requisite vote of our
shareholders will constitute the approval of the shareholders of our boards authorization of the payment of any such compensation. Each director
currently receives $250 for each board meeting attended and is reimbursed for his or her reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the
board and its committees. In addition, directors serving as chairs of our board committees receive $250 for each committee meeting attended. Our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and secretary currently receives a monthly
39
salary of $12,500 for his services.
Our board currently expects to maintain the current compensation levels of our directors and chief executive officer during the implementation of the
Plan of Dissolution and has not yet determined the amount, if any, of compensation to be received by our officers and directors above his or her
regular compensation with respect to the services related to the implementation of the Plan of Dissolution.
The approval of the Plan of Dissolution
by our shareholders also will constitute full and complete authority for our board of directors and officers, without further shareholder action, to do
and perform any and all acts and to make, execute and deliver any and all agreements, conveyances, assignments, transfers, certificates and other
documents of any kind and character that our board of directors or such officers deem in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders: (i) to
dissolve the Company in accordance with the WBCA and cause its withdrawal from all jurisdictions in which it and its subsidiaries are authorized to do
business; (ii) to dispose of the remaining property and assets of the Company; (iii) to prosecute, defend, settle or otherwise resolve any claims or
suits by or against the Company; (iv) to satisfy or make reasonable provision for the satisfaction of the Companys obligations and liabilities in
accordance with the WBCA; (v) subject to statutory limitations, to distribute all of the remaining funds of the Company and any unsold assets of the
Company pari passu to the holders of our common stock; and (vi) to otherwise take any and all actions permitted or required by the WBCA and
other applicable laws and regulations to wind up and liquidate the Company.
Professional Fees and Expenses
It is specifically contemplated that we
will retain a law firm or law firms selected by our board of directors to provide legal advice and guidance in implementing the Plan of Dissolution,
and we will pay all legal fees and expenses reasonably incurred by us in connection with or arising out of the implementation of the Plan of
Dissolution, including the prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolution of any claims or suits by or against us, the discharge of our
obligations and liabilities, and the advancement and reimbursement of any legal fees and expenses payable by us pursuant to the indemnification we
provide in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, the WBCA or otherwise. In addition, in connection with and for the purpose of implementing and
assuring completion of the Plan of Dissolution, we may, as our board of directors determines in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders,
engage and pay any brokerage, agency, professional and other reasonable fees and expenses of persons rendering services to us in connection with the
disposition of our property and assets, the implementation of the Plan of Dissolution and the winding up and liquidation of the
Company.
Indemnification
After the Effective Date, we will
continue to indemnify our officers, directors, employees and agents in accordance with our articles of incorporation and bylaws and the WBCA for
actions taken in connection with the Plan of Dissolution and the winding up of our business and affairs. Our board of directors is authorized to obtain
and maintain insurance as may be advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to cover any of our obligations under the Plan of
Dissolution, including directors and officers liability coverage and insurance coverage reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction
of reasonably estimated liability claims under the WBCA.
Liquidating Distributions
Provided that, in the opinion of our
board of directors, reasonable provision has been made for the payment, satisfaction and discharge of all known, conditional, unmatured or contingent
debts, obligations and liabilities of the Company (including liabilities and expenses incurred and anticipated to be incurred in connection with the
prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolution of any claims or suits by or against the Company, the sale of property and assets and the complete
liquidation of the Company), after the Effective Date, liquidating distributions are expected to be made from time to time to the holders of record of
outstanding shares of our common stock at the close of business on the Effective Date pro rata in accordance with the respective number of shares then
held of record. All determinations as to the time for and the amount and kind of liquidating distributions will be made in the exercise of the
discretion of our board of directors and in accordance with any applicable provision of the WBCA.
40
If any liquidating distribution payable
to a shareholder pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution cannot be made, whether because the shareholder cannot be located, has not surrendered its
certificates evidencing the common stock as may be required pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution, is not competent to receive the distribution, or for
any other reason, then the distribution to which such shareholder is entitled will be transferred, at such time as the final liquidating distribution
is made, to the Washington State Treasurer or the official of such state or other jurisdiction authorized or permitted by applicable law to receive the
proceeds of such distribution. The proceeds of such distribution will thereafter be held solely for the benefit of and for ultimate distribution to
such shareholder as the sole equitable owner thereof and will be treated as abandoned property and escheat to the applicable state or other
jurisdiction in accordance with applicable law. In no event will the proceeds of any such distribution revert to or become the property of the
Company.
Amendment, Modification or Abandonment of
Plan
If for any reason our board of
directors determines that such action would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, our board may, in its sole discretion and
without requiring further shareholder approval, revoke the Plan of Dissolution and all actions contemplated thereunder, to the extent and in the manner
permitted by the WBCA, (i) at any time prior to the Effective Date or (ii) at any time within 120 days after the Effective Date. Our board of directors
may not amend or modify the Plan of Dissolution under circumstances that would require additional shareholder approval under the WBCA and/or the
federal securities laws or Nasdaq requirements without complying with such requirements. The Plan of Dissolution would be void upon the effective date
of any such revocation. By approving the Plan of Dissolution, shareholders will be granting our board of directors the authority to abandon the Plan of
Dissolution without further shareholder action, if our board of directors determines that dissolution and liquidation are not in the best interests of
the Company and its shareholders.
Cancellation of Stock and Stock
Certificates
From and after the Effective Date, and
subject to applicable law, our common stock will be deemed cancelled and each holder of common stock will cease to have any rights in respect thereof,
except the right to receive distributions pursuant to and in accordance with the Plan of Dissolution. As a condition to delivery of any distribution to
our shareholders, our board of directors may require our shareholders to (i) surrender their certificates evidencing their shares of common stock to
the Company or (ii) furnish the Company with evidence satisfactory to our board of directors of the loss, theft or destruction of such certificates,
together with such surety bond or other security or indemnity as may be required by and satisfactory to our board of directors. We will close our stock
transfer books and discontinue recording transfers of shares of stock of the Company at the close of business on the Effective Date, and thereafter
certificates representing shares of common stock will not be assignable or transferable on the books of the Company except by will, intestate
succession or operation of law.
Liquidation Under Code Sections 331 and 336
It is intended that the Plan of
Dissolution constitutes a plan of complete liquidation of the Company within the meaning of Sections 331 and 336 of the Code. The Plan of Dissolution
will be deemed to authorize the taking of such action as, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, may be necessary to conform with the provisions of
Sections 331 and 336 of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, including the making of an election under Section 336(e) of the
Code, if applicable.
Filing of Tax Returns, Forms and Other Reports and
Statements
The Plan of Dissolution authorizes and
directs the appropriate officers of the Company to prepare (or cause to be prepared), execute and file (or cause to be filed) in accordance with all
applicable laws such returns, forms, reports and information statements, and any schedules or attachments to any of the foregoing, as may be necessary
or appropriate or required under applicable law in connection with our dissolution and liquidation and the carrying out thereof.
41
Estimated Liquidating Distributions
MANY OF THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE
AMOUNT OF CASH DISTRIBUTED TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS AS A LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTION CANNOT BE CURRENTLY QUANTIFIED WITH CERTAINTY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
ACCORDINGLY, AT THE TIME YOU VOTE ON THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE PLAN OF DISSOLUTION, YOU WILL NOT KNOW THE EXACT AMOUNT OF ANY LIQUIDATING
DISTRIBUTIONS THAT YOU MAY RECEIVE. YOU MAY RECEIVE SUBSTANTIALLY LESS THAN THE AMOUNT WE CURRENTLY ESTIMATE, OR YOU MAY NOT RECEIVE ANY LIQUIDATING
DISTRIBUTIONS.
As of December 31, 2008, we had
approximately $4.9 million in net cash. In addition to satisfying the liabilities reflected on our balance sheet, we anticipate using cash between
December 31, 2008 and throughout the liquidation process for the following:
|
|
ongoing operating, overhead and administrative
expenses; |
|
|
purchasing a director and officer liability insurance policy as
well as a tail insurance policy for periods subsequent to the Effective Date; |
|
|
expenses incurred in connection with the dissolution and our
liquidation; and |
|
|
professional, legal, tax, accounting, and consulting
fees. |
This projected liquidating distribution
analysis assumes that the Plan of Dissolution will be approved by our shareholders. If the Plan of Dissolution is not approved by our shareholders, no
liquidating distributions will be made. We intend to sell our remaining non-cash assets, consisting primarily of our Home and Garden Business, for the
best price available as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date. As of December 31, 2008, our non-cash assets represented less than 3%
of our total assets and less than 4% of our net cash. The non-cash assets that made up our Home and Garden Business as of December 31, 2008 consisted
of approximately $70,000 in inventory, the license and supply agreement with Plant Health Care and approximately $19,000 of prepaid EPA and state
product registrations. The amount of inventory is based on historical cost while the registrations are based on the registration fees actually paid. We
have not historically assigned any value to the license and supply agreement because management believed there was no material value. As of December
31, 2008, our other non-cash assets consisted of approximately $69,000 of prepaid insurance expenses.
We do not expect the net proceeds from
the sale of our Home and Garden Business to represent a material portion of the total amount available for distribution to our shareholders. We cannot
currently estimate the value of our Home and Garden Business because we cannot predict the value that potential acquirers may place on the license and
supply agreement, the product registrations and our remaining inventory, whether and to what extent we may receive competing bids for these assets and
the extent to which the sale of these assets in dissolution may adversely affect the purchase price of such assets. Accordingly, such amounts are not
included in the calculation of liquidating distributions to our shareholders. Any amounts we receive upon the sale of the non-cash assets comprising
our Home and Garden Business would increase the estimated liquidating distributions payable to our shareholders based on the assumptions set forth
below. The amount of any contingency reserve established by our board of directors will be deducted before the determination of amounts available for
distribution to shareholders. Based on the foregoing, we currently estimate that the amount ultimately distributed to our shareholders will be between
approximately $1.27 and $1.42 per share of common stock, computed as described below. The following estimates are not guarantees and they do not
reflect the total range of possible outcomes. You may receive substantially less than the amount of liquidating distributions we currently estimate, or
you may not receive any liquidating distributions.
42
Estimated Liquidating Distributions to
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Low Range of Net Proceeds
|
|
High Range of Net Proceeds
|
Net Cash as
of December 31, 2008 (a) |
|
|
|
$ |
4,930,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,930,000 |
|
Total
Estimated Cash Assets (b) |
|
|
|
|
4,930,000 |
|
|
|
4,930,000 |
|
Operating
Expenses (c) |
|
|
|
|
879,000 |
|
|
|
645,000 |
|
Professional
Fees (attorneys, accountants, tax and agent) (d) |
|
|
|
|
431,000 |
|
|
|
339,000 |
|
Insurance
(e) |
|
|
|
|
116,000 |
|
|
|
79,000 |
|
Interest
Income (f) |
|
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
(47,000 |
) |
Total
Operating Expenses, net |
|
|
|
|
1,391,000 |
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
Reserve for
Claimants (g) |
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Total
Estimated Net Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
1,491,000 |
|
|
|
1,066,000 |
|
Estimated
Cash to Distribute to Shareholders (b) |
|
|
|
$ |
3,439,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,864,000 |
|
Shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
2,716,486 |
|
|
|
2,716,486 |
|
Estimated
per share distribution (b) |
|
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
Notes
(a) |
|
Represents cash and cash equivalents of approximately $5.1
million as of December 31, 2008, less outstanding liabilities as of December 31, 2008 of approximately $169,000, including accounts payable and accrued
expenses. The amount of outstanding liabilities at December 31, 2008 excludes $25,000 for a deductible that is discussed in footnote (g)
below. |
(b) |
|
Does not include estimated value of non-cash assets for the
reasons set forth in the paragraph immediately preceding this table. |
(c) |
|
Operating expenses consist primarily of (i) estimated salaries
and related benefits for our three part-time employees for 13 and ten months from December 31, 2008 in the low and high range of net proceeds,
respectively, including $24,000 in total severance pay to our two non-executive part-time employees, (ii) estimated directors compensation and
reimbursement requests through the period ending three years after the Effective Date, assuming that we maintain eight board members and current
director compensation levels, (iii) estimated monthly operating expenses consisting of office lease payments, telecommunications and Internet usage
fees, common area maintenance expenses and business taxes of approximately $45,000 per month for 13 months from December 31, 2008 and $42,000 per month
for ten months from December 31, 2008 in the low and high range of net proceeds, respectively, (iv) estimated monthly operating expenses of
approximately $4,000 and $2,500 per month for the remaining 28 and 31 months of our corporate existence under Washington law in the low and high range
of net proceeds, respectively, and (v) a $27,500 payment representing our annual fee owed to The Nasdaq Capital Market, which was paid in January 2009.
The operating expenses are based on the assumption that the Effective Date occurs by the beginning of June 2009, or approximately five months after
December 31, 2008. On the low range of net proceeds, we currently estimate that we will continue to incur normal operating expenses for approximately
eight months from the Effective Date. On the high range of net proceeds, we currently estimate that we will continue to incur normal operating expenses
for approximately five months from the Effective Date. Thereafter, we expect to incur lower operating expenses as noted in subclause (iv) above for the
duration of our corporate existence under Washington law. Our office lease expires in May 2009 and the estimated operating expenses assume that we will
continue to lease such offices on a month-to-month basis for 13 and ten months from its expiration in the low and high range of net proceeds,
respectively. |
(d) |
|
Estimated professional fees for both the low and high range of
net proceeds include the attorney, accountant, tax and transfer, soliciting and paying agent fees and expenses to complete (i) the special meeting and
the dissolution, (ii) the 2008 year-end audit, (iii) our annual report on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and (iv) our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. |
(e) |
|
We will purchase a director and officer liability insurance
policy, as well as a tail insurance policy for six years subsequent to the Effective Date. The estimated premium for our director and
officer liability insurance policy is net of estimated refunds under such policy. |
(f) |
|
We have estimated interest income on our cash and cash
equivalents at an annual rate of 0.75%. |
43
(g) |
|
Amount estimated to cover any potential claims made against us
during the three-year period following the Effective Date. We are not currently aware of any potential claims, other than the pending litigation for
which we have already reserved $25,000 to cover the deductible amount on the insurance covering such litigation. The amount of any contingency reserve
ultimately established by our board of directors will be deducted before the determination of amounts available for distribution to shareholders. See
Contingency Reserve. |
The estimated range of approximately
$1.27 to $1.42 per share is our best current estimate of the amount of cash that will be available for distribution to shareholders following the
prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolution of claims and suits and satisfaction of liabilities, including payment of final closeout and
dissolution expenses and the establishment of adequate reserves and other means reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction of current,
contingent or conditional liabilities. We will continue to defend suits and incur claims, liabilities and expenses (such as salaries and benefits,
directors and officers insurance, payroll and local taxes, facilities expenses, legal, accounting and consulting fees and miscellaneous
office expenses) following approval of the Plan of Dissolution and during the three years following the Effective Date. Satisfaction of these
liabilities and expenses will reduce the amount of assets available for ultimate distribution to shareholders. While we cannot predict the actual
amount of our liabilities and expenses, we believe that available cash and any amounts received from the sale of our remaining non-cash assets will be
adequate to provide for satisfaction of our liabilities and expenses and that we will make one or more cash distributions to
shareholders.
We presently expect to make an initial
distribution to shareholders of up to $1.00 per share within 45 days after the Effective Date. We do not intend to make any further distributions until
after we sell our non-cash assets, consisting primarily of our Home and Garden Business, settle claims with our known creditors and establish reserves
or otherwise make reasonable provision for the prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolution of claims and suits and the satisfaction of
liabilities, which activities we do not expect to complete until at least six months after the Effective Date. However, we are not able to predict the
precise nature, amount or timing of any liquidating distributions, due primarily to our inability to predict the amount of our remaining liabilities,
the amount that we will expend during the course of the liquidation, the timing of any sales of our non-cash assets, the net proceeds from such sales,
and the net value of our remaining non-cash assets. To the extent that the amount of our liabilities or the amounts that we expend during the
liquidation are greater than we anticipate, our shareholders may receive substantially less than we presently anticipate, or may not receive any
distributions. Our board has not established a firm timetable for final distributions to our shareholders. Subject to contingencies inherent in winding
up our business and affairs, our board of directors intends to authorize any distributions as promptly as reasonably practicable in the best interests
of the Company and its shareholders. Our board of directors, in its discretion, will determine the nature, amount and timing of all distributions. See
Risk Factors Risks Related to the Plan of Dissolution.
Conduct of the Company Following
Dissolution
If the Plan of Dissolution is approved
by the requisite vote of our shareholders, we intend to file articles of dissolution with the Secretary of State as soon as reasonably practicable
after receipt of the required revenue clearance certificate from the Department of Revenue. We intend to make a public announcement in advance of the
anticipated Effective Date. After the Effective Date, our corporate existence will continue but we may not carry on any business except that
appropriate to wind up and liquidate our business and affairs, including collecting and disposing of our assets, satisfying or making reasonable
provision for the satisfaction of our liabilities and, subject to legal requirements, distributing our remaining property among our
shareholders.
Sale of Remaining Assets
The Plan of Dissolution gives our board
of directors the authority to dispose of all of our remaining property and assets. Shareholder approval of the Plan of Dissolution will constitute
approval of any and all such future asset dispositions on such terms as our board of directors, in its discretion in the best interests of the Company
and its shareholders and without further shareholder approval, may determine. We intend to sell our remaining non-cash assets, consisting primarily of
our Home and Garden Business, on such terms as are approved by our board of directors in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. We may
conduct
44
sales by any means, including by
competitive bidding or private negotiations, to one or more purchasers in one or more transactions over a period of time. We currently expect to seek
competitive bids on the assets as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date. The goal of the competitive bidding process will be to
enable our board of directors to obtain the best price possible for the assets and thereby maximize shareholder value. We do not expect to solicit any
further shareholder votes with respect to the approval of the specific terms of any particular sale of assets approved by our board of directors. See
Interests of Management in the Dissolution of the Company for information regarding the interest expressed by one of our
directors in the potential acquisition of our Home and Garden Business.
The prices at which we will be able to
sell our remaining non-cash assets will depend largely on factors beyond our control, including the supply and demand for such assets, changes in
interest rates, the condition of financial markets, the availability of financing to prospective purchasers of the assets and regulatory approvals. The
net price that we receive for our remaining non-cash assets will be reduced to the extent that we employ brokers to assist in the sale of such assets.
In addition, we may not obtain as high a price for a particular asset as we might secure if we were not in liquidation. Upon the sale of any of our
assets in connection with our liquidation, we will generally recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the fair market
value of the consideration received for each asset sold and (ii) our adjusted tax basis in the asset sold. See Certain Material U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences below.
Contingency Reserve
Under the WBCA, we generally are
required, in connection with our dissolution, to pay or make reasonable provision for the prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolution of
claims and suits and the satisfaction of liabilities. Following the Effective Date, we will pay all expenses and other known liabilities and establish
a contingency reserve, consisting of cash or other assets that are adequate for the satisfaction of all current, contingent or conditional liabilities.
As of December 31, 2008, our known current, contingent and conditional liabilities consisted of approximately $42,000 of accounts payable and
approximately $151,000 of accrued liabilities related to legal fees and warranty claims, including a $25,000 deductible amount on insurance covering
pending litigation, which amount is currently reserved to cover the potential exposure. We also may seek to acquire insurance coverage and take other
steps our board determines are reasonably calculated to provide for the satisfaction of the reasonably estimated amount of such liabilities. We are
currently unable to provide a precise estimate of the amount of the contingency reserve or the cost of insurance or other steps we may undertake to
make provision for the satisfaction of liabilities, but any such amount will be deducted before the determination of amounts available for distribution
to shareholders.
The actual amount of the contingency
reserve will be based upon estimates and opinions of our board of directors, derived from consultations with management and outside experts, if our
board of directors determines that it is advisable to retain such experts, and a review of our estimated contingent liabilities and our estimated
ongoing expenses, including anticipated salary and benefits payments, estimated investment banking, legal and accounting fees, rent, payroll and other
taxes, miscellaneous office expenses, facilities costs and expenses accrued in our financial statements. We anticipate that expenses for professional
fees and other expenses of liquidation may be significant. Our established contingency reserve may not be sufficient to satisfy all of our obligations,
expenses and liabilities, in which case a creditor could bring a claim against one or more of our shareholders for the total amount distributed by us
to that shareholder or shareholders pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution. From time to time, we may distribute to our shareholders on a pro rata basis
any portions of the contingency reserve that our board of directors deems no longer to be required.
Potential Liability of Shareholders
Under the WBCA, if the amount of the
contingency reserve and other measures reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction of liabilities are insufficient to satisfy the aggregate
amount ultimately found payable in respect of our liabilities, each shareholder could be held liable for amounts due creditors up to the amounts
distributed to such shareholder under the Plan of Dissolution.
The potential for shareholder liability
regarding a distribution continues for three years after the Effective Date. Under the WBCA, our dissolution does not remove or impair any remedy
available against the Company, its directors, officers or shareholders for any right or claim existing, or any liability incurred,
prior
45
to such dissolution or arising
thereafter, unless the action or other proceeding thereon is not commenced within three years after the Effective Date.
If we were held by a court to have
failed to make adequate provision for our expenses and liabilities or if the amount ultimately required to be paid in respect of such liabilities
exceeded the amount available from the contingency reserve, a creditor could seek an injunction against us to prevent us from making distributions to
shareholders under the Plan of Dissolution. Any such action could delay and substantially diminish liquidating distributions to our
shareholders.
Reporting Requirements
Whether or not the Plan of Dissolution
is approved, we have an obligation to continue to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, even though compliance with
such reporting requirements is economically burdensome. If the Plan of Dissolution is approved by our shareholders, in order to curtail expenses, we
intend, after the Effective Date, to seek relief from the SEC from the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act. We anticipate, however, that even
if such relief is granted, we would continue to file current reports on Form 8-K to disclose material events relating to our liquidation and
dissolution along with any other reports that the SEC might require. However, the SEC may not grant any such relief.
Closing of Transfer Books
We intend to close our stock transfer
books and discontinue recording transfers of shares of our common stock at the close of business on the Effective Date, and thereafter certificates
representing shares of our common stock will not be assignable or transferable on our books except by will, intestate succession or operation of law.
After the Effective Date, we will not issue any new stock certificates, other than replacement certificates. It is anticipated that no further trading
of our shares will occur after the Effective Date. The Effective Date will be determined following the receipt of a revenue clearance certificate from
the Department of Revenue and will be announced as soon as reasonably practicable after that time. See Cessation of Trading of Common
Stock below.
Any liquidating distributions made by
us after the Effective Date will be made to shareholders according to their holdings of common stock as of the close of business on the Effective Date.
Subsequent to the Effective Date, we may at our election require shareholders to surrender certificates representing their shares of our common stock
in order to receive subsequent distributions. If surrender of stock certificates should be required following the dissolution, we will send you written
instructions regarding such surrender. Shareholders should not forward their stock certificates before receiving instructions to do so. Any
distributions otherwise payable by us to shareholders who have not surrendered their stock certificates, if requested to do so, may be held in trust
for such shareholders, without interest, pending the surrender of such certificates (subject to escheat pursuant to the laws relating to unclaimed
property). If a shareholders certificate(s) evidencing his, her or its common stock has been lost, stolen, or destroyed, the shareholder may be
required to furnish us with satisfactory evidence of the loss, theft, or destruction, together with a surety bond or other security or indemnity, as a
condition to the receipt of any distribution.
Cessation of Trading of Common Stock
We anticipate that we will request that
our common stock be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market at the close of business on the Effective Date. As noted above, we also currently intend to
close our stock transfer books at the close of business on the Effective Date and to cease recording transfers and issuing stock certificates (other
than replacement certificates) at such time. Accordingly, it is expected that trading in the shares of our common stock will cease after the Effective
Date.
Absence of Dissenters Rights
Holders of our shares of common stock
are not entitled to assert dissenters rights with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Dissolution under Chapter 23B.13 of the
WBCA.
46
Regulatory Approvals
We are not aware of any United States
federal or state regulatory requirements or governmental approvals or actions that may be required to consummate the Plan of Dissolution, except for
compliance with the applicable regulations of the SEC in connection with this proxy statement and compliance with the WBCA. Additionally, our
dissolution requires that we obtain a revenue clearance certificate from the Department of Revenue certifying that every license fee, tax increase or
penalty of the Company has been paid or provided for. In order to obtain the revenue clearance certificate, we must file an application with the
Department of Revenue. If shareholders approve the Plan of Dissolution, we intend to file such application as soon as reasonably practicable after the
special meeting. Once we receive the revenue clearance certificate, we must file articles of dissolution with the Secretary of State. We intend to file
our articles of dissolution with the Secretary of State as soon as reasonably practicable after our receipt of the revenue clearance certificate from
the Department of Revenue. The dissolution will be effective on the date on which we file the articles of dissolution or a later date specified in the
articles of dissolution.
Interests of Management in the Dissolution of the
Company
Our directors currently hold options to
purchase an aggregate of 93,328 shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the plans under which the options were granted, the options will
automatically terminate immediately prior to the Effective Date. However, the directors may exercise any vested options prior to their termination, and
options granted under our 1995 Combined Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan may be exercised whether or not all vesting requirements have been
satisfied. Because the exercise prices of the options held by our directors are greater than the estimated per share liquidating distribution payable
under the Plan of Dissolution, we do not expect any options held by our directors will be exercised prior to their termination. See Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management for information on the number of shares and options held by our directors. Nathaniel T.
Brown, our sole executive officer, does not own any shares of our common stock or options.
Following dissolution, we will continue
to indemnify our officers, directors, employees and agents in accordance with our articles of incorporation and bylaws for actions taken in connection
with the Plan of Dissolution and the winding up of our business and affairs, and we will continue to compensate our officers, directors and employees
in connection with their services provided in connection with the implementation of the Plan of Dissolution. See Principal Provisions
of the Plan of Dissolution Authority of Officers and Directors for information on the compensation payable to our officers and
directors in connection with their services provided in connection with the implementation of the Plan of Dissolution. As part of our dissolution
process, we will purchase a director and officer liability insurance policy as well as a tail insurance policy for periods subsequent to
the Effective Date. See Principal Provisions of the Plan of Dissolution above.
Dr. Rhett Atkins, one of our directors
and our former chief executive officer and president, has expressed interest in the potential acquisition of our Home and Garden Business after the
Effective Date, although he has not submitted an offer regarding the potential acquisition. Our board of directors will review any offer for our Home
and Garden Business made by Dr. Atkins and compare it against all other third-party offers. Any transaction between the Company and Dr. Atkins would be
negotiated on an arms-length basis and would be subject to the approval of the requisite vote of our disinterested directors.
Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences
The following discussion is a general
summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the dissolution and liquidation of the Company pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution to
the Company and its shareholders. The discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to particular
shareholders in light of their particular circumstances, or to shareholders that are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws,
including, without limitation, financial institutions, persons that are partnerships or other pass-through entities, non-U.S. individuals and entities,
or persons who acquired their shares of our common stock through stock options or other compensatory arrangements. This discussion does not address the
U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to holders of options to purchase our common stock. Furthermore, this discussion does not address any
U.S. federal estate and gift or
47
alternative minimum tax
consequences or any state, local or foreign tax consequences of our dissolution and liquidation pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution.
The following discussion is based on
the Code, applicable Treasury Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, each as in effect as of the date hereof, all of
which may change, possibly with retroactive effect. The discussion assumes that shares of our common stock are held as capital assets within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment).
The following discussion has no binding
effect on the IRS or the courts. Liquidating distributions pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution may occur at various times and in more than one tax
year. We can give no assurance that the U.S. federal income tax treatment described herein will remain unchanged at the time of our liquidating
distributions. No ruling has been requested from the IRS with respect to any tax consequences of the Plan of Dissolution, and we will not seek any such
ruling or an opinion of counsel with respect to any such tax consequences.
THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION DOES NOT
PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE PLAN OF DISSOLUTION AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED
TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM IN CONNECTION WITH OUR DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION PURSUANT TO THE PLAN
OF DISSOLUTION, INCLUDING TAX RETURN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND THE EFFECT OF FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to the
Company
After the approval of the Plan of
Dissolution and until our liquidation is completed, we will continue to be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income, if any, such as
interest income, gain from the sale of any remaining assets or income from operations. Upon the sale of any of our assets in connection with our
liquidation, we will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of the consideration received for
each asset sold and (ii) our adjusted tax basis in the asset sold. We should not recognize any gain or loss upon the distribution of cash to our
shareholders in liquidation of their shares of our common stock. We currently do not anticipate making distributions of property other than cash to
shareholders in our liquidation. In the event we were to make a liquidating distribution of property other than cash to our shareholders, we may
recognize gain upon the distribution of such property as if we sold the distributed property for its fair market value on the date of the distribution.
We currently do not anticipate that our dissolution and liquidation pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution will produce a material corporate tax liability
for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to
Shareholders
In general, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, we intend that amounts received by our shareholders pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution will be treated as full payment in exchange for their
shares of our common stock. As a result of our dissolution and liquidation, shareholders generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference
between (i) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value (at the time of distribution) of property, if any, distributed to them and (ii)
their tax basis for their shares of our common stock. In general, a shareholders gain or loss will be computed on a per share basis.
If we make more than one liquidating distribution, which is expected, each liquidating distribution will be allocated proportionately to each share of
stock owned by a shareholder, and the value of each liquidating distribution will be applied against and reduce a shareholders tax basis in his
or her shares of stock. In general, gain will be recognized as a result of a liquidating distribution to the extent that the aggregate value of all
liquidating distributions received by a shareholder with respect to a share exceeds his or her tax basis for that share. Any loss generally will be
recognized by a shareholder only when the shareholder receives our final liquidating distribution to shareholders, and then only if the aggregate value
of all liquidating distributions with respect to a share is less than the shareholders tax basis for that share. Gain or loss recognized by a
shareholder generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long term capital gain or loss if the stock has been held for more than one year. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
48
In the unlikely event we make a
liquidating distribution of property other than cash to our shareholders, a shareholders tax basis in such property immediately after the
distribution generally will be the fair market value of the property received by the shareholder at the time of distribution. Gain or loss realized
upon the shareholders future sale of that property generally would be measured by the difference between the proceeds received by the shareholder
in the sale and the tax basis of the property sold.
In the event that our liabilities are
not fully covered by the assets in our contingency reserve or otherwise satisfied through insurance or other reasonable means (See
Contingency Reserve above), payments made by a shareholder in satisfaction of those liabilities generally would produce a capital loss for
such shareholder in the year the liabilities are paid. The deductibility of any such capital loss would generally be subject to certain limitations
under the Code.
Reporting of Liquidating Distributions and Back-Up
Withholding
After the close of each taxable year,
we will provide shareholders and the IRS with a statement of the amount of cash distributed to our shareholders in our liquidation and our best
estimate as to the value of any property distributed to them during the relevant taxable year. In the unlikely event we make a liquidating distribution
of property other than cash to our shareholders, no assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge our valuation of the distributed property.
Any shareholder owning at least five percent (by vote or value) of our total outstanding stock may be subject to special rules regarding information to
be provided with the shareholders U.S. federal income tax returns. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax
consequences to them in connection with our dissolution and liquidation pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution, including tax return reporting
requirements. Liquidating distributions made to our shareholders pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution may be subject to back-up withholding (currently
at a rate of 28%) requirements. Back-up withholding generally will not apply to payments made to exempt recipients, including corporations or financial
institutions, or individuals who furnish their correct taxpayer identification number or a certificate of foreign status and other required
information. Back-up withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, amounts withheld generally may be used as a credit against a shareholders U.S.
federal income tax liability or the shareholder may claim a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely and duly filing a claim for refund with the
IRS.
Accounting Treatment
If our shareholders approve the Plan of
Dissolution, we will change our basis of accounting from the going-concern basis, which contemplates realization of assets and satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business, to the liquidation basis. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their estimated
net realizable values and liabilities are stated at their estimated settlement amounts. Recorded liabilities will include the estimated expenses
associated with carrying out the Plan of Dissolution. For periodic reporting, a statement of net assets in liquidation will summarize the liquidation
value per outstanding share of common stock. Valuations presented in the statement will represent managements estimates, based on present facts
and circumstances, of the net realizable values of assets, estimated settlement amounts of liabilities, and expenses associated with carrying out the
Plan of Dissolution based upon management assumptions.
The valuation of assets and liabilities
will necessarily require many estimates and assumptions, and there will be substantial uncertainties in carrying out the provisions of the Plan of
Dissolution. Ultimate values of assets and settlement amounts for liabilities are expected to differ from estimates recorded in interim
statements.
Required Vote
All holders of our common stock as of
the record date are entitled to vote on Proposal 1. The affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our common stock is
required for approval of the proposed Plan of Dissolution. Abstentions from voting and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against
Proposal 1. It is intended that shares represented by the enclosed form of proxy will be voted in favor of Proposal 1 unless otherwise specified in
such proxy.
Members of our board of directors who
beneficially owned as of March 23, 2009 an aggregate of approximately 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock have indicated that they will
vote in favor
49
of Proposal 1. Affiliates of
Stephens beneficially owned approximately 19.8% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of March 23, 2009. SF Holding Corp. and Stephens
EBC, LLC collectively beneficially own approximately 16.6% of our outstanding common stock, which shares are the subject of a voting trust under
which the trustee is required to vote the shares for or against proposals submitted to our shareholders in the same proportion as the votes cast for or
against such proposals by all other shareholders, except abstentions. The chief executive officer and president of Stephens is the co-chairman of SF
Holding Corp., the sole managing member of Stephens EBC, LLC. The other affiliates of Stephens, who beneficially own approximately 3.2% of our
outstanding common stock, have not indicated to us whether they intend to vote their shares in favor of the Plan of Dissolution. Stephens does not have
voting or investment power over any of the shares held by its affiliates. See Proposal 1: Approval of Plan of Dissolution Background
and Reasons for the Proposed Dissolution and Liquidation Background.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
Our board of directors has determined
that the voluntary dissolution and liquidation of the Company pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution is advisable and in the best interests of the Company
and its shareholders. Our board of directors has approved the Plan of Dissolution and unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR
the Plan of Dissolution.
50
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below is selected financial
data for the Company for the periods indicated. The statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the balance sheet
data as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 have been derived from our audited financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, which is being delivered with and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. The statements of operations data for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 has been derived from our audited
annual financial statements, which are not being delivered with or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. When you read this selected
financial data, it is important that you also read our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in that report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Unless otherwise
indicated, we have retroactively adjusted all common stock-related amounts in this report to reflect our one-for-three reverse stock splits effective
on each of February 22, 2008 and April 18, 2006.
On December 4, 2008, our board of
directors voted to adopt the Plan of Dissolution, subject to shareholder approval. If our shareholders approve the Plan of Dissolution, we will change
our basis of accounting from a going-concern basis, which contemplates realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of
business, to a liquidation basis. Under a liquidation basis of accounting, assets are stated at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities
are stated at their estimated settlement amounts. Recorded liabilities will include the estimated expenses associated with carrying out the Plan of
Dissolution. The financial information presented below and delivered with and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement does not include any
adjustments necessary to reflect the possible future effects on recoverability of the assets or settlement of liabilities that may result from adoption
of the Plan of Dissolution or our potential to complete such a plan in an orderly manner.
On February 28, 2007, we completed the
sale of our proprietary harpin protein technology and substantially all of the assets related to our worldwide agricultural and horticultural markets
to Plant Health Care pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated as of December 1, 2006. Under the terms of the sale, Plant Health Care purchased
substantially all of our assets and other rights relating to the creation of plant health technology incorporating harpin proteins and the manufacture
of biopesticide, plant health and nutrient products utilizing harpin protein technology. We retained our cash, accounts receivable and assets relating
to our Home and Garden Business, consisting primarily of our inventory of harpin protein-based products designated for the Home and Garden Market.
Accordingly, our results of operations for 2008 and 2007 are not comparable to prior periods.
51
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Statements
of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
sales, net of sales allowances |
|
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
3,790 |
|
|
$ |
3,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods
sold |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
Research and
development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
3,505 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
5,391 |
|
|
|
4,418 |
|
Loss on
impairment of equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,902 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on
write-down of inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
termination loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale
of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on
facility subleases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
13,586 |
|
|
|
14,917 |
|
|
|
10,148 |
|
Loss from
operations |
|
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
(9,796 |
) |
|
|
(11,153 |
) |
|
|
(9,108 |
) |
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale
of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale
of Harpin Protein Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income |
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Total other
income |
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
$ |
(579 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,001 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,445 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,858 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,886 |
) |
Basic and
diluted net loss per share |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.37 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.48 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.28 |
) |
Weighted
average shares outstanding used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
|
$ |
5,099 |
|
|
$ |
5,668 |
|
|
$ |
4,185 |
|
|
$ |
6,826 |
|
|
$ |
11,860 |
|
Working
capital |
|
|
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
|
|
6,138 |
|
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
13,970 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
5,256 |
|
|
|
5,898 |
|
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
17,497 |
|
|
|
31,336 |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
|
|
(127,833 |
) |
|
|
(127,254 |
) |
|
|
(126,253 |
) |
|
|
(116,808 |
) |
|
|
(105,950 |
) |
Total
shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
26,609 |
|
52
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETING TO
SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES
We are soliciting proxies to grant
authority to the proxy holders to adjourn the special meeting to another date, time or place if necessary in their judgment, for the purpose of
soliciting additional proxies to vote in favor of Proposal 1. Any adjournment of the special meeting may be made without notice, other than by the
announcement made at the special meeting, if the votes cast in favor of the adjournment proposal by the holders of shares of our common stock entitled
to vote on the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal at the special meeting. If the meeting is adjourned to another time, date or place,
notice is not required to be provided to the shareholders of the adjourned meeting and a new record date is not required if the date, time and place of
the new meeting are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken and the adjournment is for no more than 120 days after the date of the
original meeting. If we adjourn the special meeting to a later date, we will conduct the same business at the later meeting and, unless the law
requires us to set a new record date, only the shareholders who were eligible to vote at the original meeting will be permitted to vote at the
adjourned meeting.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
Our board of directors unanimously
recommends that shareholders vote FOR approval of Proposal 2.
53
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
Except as otherwise noted, the
following table sets forth, as of March 23, 2009, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each
shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) our current chief
executive officer and other executive officers that were included in the summary compensation table found in our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. The following table reflects the one-for-three
reverse stock split effective on February 22, 2008.
Beneficial ownership is determined in
accordance with SEC rules and includes shares over which the indicated beneficial owner exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Shares of
our common stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009 are deemed outstanding for computing the
percentage ownership of the person holding the options, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Except as otherwise indicated, we believe the beneficial owners of our common stock listed below, based on information furnished by them, have sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed opposite their names.
Name and Address Of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
Percent of Class (2)
|
Directors
and Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William T.
Weyerhaeuser |
|
|
|
|
143,129 |
(3) |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Nathaniel T.
Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agatha L.
Maza |
|
|
|
|
73,050 |
(4) |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Jon E. M.
Jacoby |
|
|
|
|
60,042 |
(5) |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Albert A.
James |
|
|
|
|
67,965 |
(6) |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Rhett R.
Atkins |
|
|
|
|
56,288 |
(7) |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Richard N.
Pahre |
|
|
|
|
4,554 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
Gilberto H.
Gonzalez |
|
|
|
|
4,054 |
(9) |
|
|
* |
|
Roger Ivesdal
|
|
|
|
|
3,333 |
(10) |
|
|
* |
|
Bradley S.
Powell |
|
|
|
|
22 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
All directors
and executive officers as a group (10 persons) |
|
|
|
|
412,437 |
(12) |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
Other 5%
Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SF Holding
Corp. (formerly Stephens Group, Inc.) 111 Center Street Suite 2500 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 |
|
|
|
|
451,037 |
(13) |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
Yorktown
Avenue Capital, LLC 415 South Boston, 9th Floor Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103 |
|
|
|
|
352,967 |
(14) |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
(1) |
|
The business address of the directors and executive officers is
c/o Eden Bioscience Corporation, 14522 NE North Woodinville Way, Suite 202B, Woodinville, WA 98072. |
(2) |
|
Based on 2,716,486 shares of common stock outstanding as of
March 23, 2009. |
(3) |
|
Represents 28,833 shares owned directly by Dr. Weyerhaeuser;
106,519 shares held by the WBW Trust Number One, of which Dr. Weyerhaeuser is trustee; 1,111 shares owned by Dr. Weyerhaeusers wife; and 6,666
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. Dr. Weyerhaeuser disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by his wife
and two sons, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such shares. |
(4) |
|
Represents 34,466 shares owned directly by Ms. Maza; 16,799
shares held by Prudential Securities as custodian for the Agatha L. Maza IRA; 111 shares owned by Ms. Mazas spouse; 15,008 shares held by the
Maza Family LLC, of which Ms. Maza is a co-manager; and 6,666 shares subject to options that are |
54
|
|
exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. Ms. Maza
disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by the Maza Family LLC, except to the extent of her pecuniary interest in such shares. |
(5) |
|
Includes 5,000 shares owned directly by Mr. Jacoby; 23,710
shares owned by Jacoby Enterprises, Inc., of which Mr. Jacoby is president; 20,889 shares held by Stephens EBC, LLC for the benefit of Jacoby
Enterprises, Inc. and that are subject to the voting trust described in footnote 13; 3,333 shares held by Stephens EBC, LLC for the benefit of J
& J Partners, of which Mr. Jacoby is a partner, and that are subject to the voting trust described in footnote 13; and 6,666 shares subject to
options that are exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. Also includes the following shares as to which Mr. Jacoby disclaims beneficial
ownership: 222 shares owned by Grandchilds Trust One and 222 shares owned by Grandchilds Trust Three, as to which Mr. Jacoby, as
co-trustee, has shared power of disposition and shared power to vote. Does not include shares beneficially owned by SF Holding Corp. (formerly Stephens
Group, Inc.), of which Mr. Jacoby was an executive officer until his retirement on October 1, 2003 and of which he was a director until November
2006. |
(6) |
|
Represents 12,839 shares held by the Albert A. James Family
Partnership, of which Mr. James is a co-general partner; 48,460 shares held by the Albert A. James Living Trust, of which Mr. James is trustee; and
6,666 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. |
(7) |
|
Represents 733 shares owned directly by Dr. Atkins and 55,555
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. |
(8) |
|
Represents 666 shares owned directly by Mr. Pahre and 3,888
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. |
(9) |
|
Represents 166 shares owned directly by Mr. Gonzalez and 3,888
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days after March 23, 2009. |
(10) |
|
Represents 3,333 shares subject to options exercisable within 60
days after March 23, 2009. |
(11) |
|
Represents shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr.
Powells minor sons, of which Mr. Powells father serves as trustee. Mr. Powell disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares held in
trust, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such shares. Mr. Powell served as our president, chief financial officer and secretary until
his resignation in September 2008. |
(12) |
|
Includes 93,328 shares subject to options that are exercisable
within 60 days after March 23, 2009. |
(13) |
|
Represents 451,037 shares beneficially owned by Stephens
EBC, LLC, of which SF Holding Corp. (formerly Stephens Group, Inc.) is the sole managing member. Stephens Inc. does not have voting or investment power
over any of the shares reported in this table. Jon E. M. Jacoby, a director of the Company, was an executive vice president of SF Holding Corp. until
October 1, 2003 and a director of SF Holding Corp. until November 2006. Stephens EBC, LLC has contributed all of its shares to a voting trust
pursuant to which the trustee of the trust, Steve Patterson, 349 Colony Drive, Naples, Florida 34108, an individual not affiliated with SF Holding
Corp., has sole voting power. The trustee is required to vote such shares for or against proposals submitted to our
shareholders in the same proportion as the votes cast for or against such proposals by all other shareholders, excluding
abstentions. The voting trust agreement also imposes limitations on the sale or other disposition of the shares subject to the voting trust. The voting
trust agreement expires in 2010 or earlier upon the occurrence of certain events set forth in the voting trust agreement, including Stephens Inc.
ceasing to be a market maker of our common stock. |
(14) |
|
Information provided is based solely on a Schedule 13D/A filed
on August 14, 2007 (the Schedule 13D/A) by Yorktown Avenue Capital, LLC (Yorktown), Boston Avenue Capital, LLC
(Boston), Value Fund Advisors, LLC (Value Fund) and Charles M. Gillman (Gillman). According to
the Schedule 13D/A, (a) the amount shown above includes 262,090 held by Yorktown and 90,877 held by Boston, (b) Boston and Yorktown are Oklahoma
limited liability companies whose principal business is business investment, (c) Value Fund is an Oklahoma limited liability company whose principal
business is investment management, and (d) Gillman is a U.S. citizen in the business of managing various investment entities. Value Fund, as general
manager of Boston and Yorktown, and Gillman, as manager of Value Fund, may also be deemed to beneficially own the 352,967 shares of our common stock
held by Boston and Yorktown. |
55
Market for Common Stock
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq
Capital Market under the symbol EDEN. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our
common stock as quoted on The Nasdaq Capital Market for each full quarterly period. The sales prices set forth below have been retroactively adjusted
to reflect the one-for-three reverse stock split effective on February 22, 2008. The closing sales price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital
Market was $0.79 on December 4, 2008, the day prior to the announcement that our board approved the Plan of Dissolution. The closing sales price of our
common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market was $1.29 on March 26, 2009.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
First Quarter
(1) |
|
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Second
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
Fourth
Quarter (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
(1) |
|
For the first quarter of 2009, reflects high and low sales
prices through March 26, 2009. |
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC
at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. You may also find the materials we file with the SEC on the About Us
Investor Information section of our website at http://www.edenbio.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into,
or made a part of, this proxy statement.
HOUSEHOLDING
Beneficial owners, but not record
holders, of our common stock who share a single address may receive only one copy of this proxy statement, unless their broker has received contrary
instructions from any beneficial owner at that address. This practice, known as householding, is designed to reduce printing and mailing
expenses. If any beneficial owner at such an address wishes to discontinue householding and receive a separate copy of the proxy statement, they should
notify their broker. Beneficial owners sharing an address to which a single copy of the proxy statement was delivered can also request prompt delivery
of a separate copy of the proxy statement by contacting us at Eden Bioscience Corporation, Attn: Secretary, 14522 NE North Woodinville Way, Suite 202B,
Woodinville, WA 98072, (425) 806-7300.
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
If you have additional questions about
the special meeting, you should contact:
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services
480 Washington Boulevard,
27th Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07310
Telephone: (888) 845-4020
Nathaniel T. Brown, Secretary
Eden Bioscience Corporation
14522 NE North Woodinville Way, Suite 202B
Woodinville, WA 98072
Telephone: (425) 806-7300
56
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2009 ANNUAL
MEETING
Submission of Shareholder Proposals for Inclusion in the Proxy Statement for 2009 Annual Meeting
Under the SECs proxy rules,
shareholder proposals that meet certain conditions may be included in our proxy statement and form of proxy for a particular annual meeting of
shareholders. If we hold an annual meeting in 2009, shareholders that intend to present a proposal at our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders were
required to give notice of the proposal to the Company no later than December 23, 2008 to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form
of proxy relating to the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders. However, if the date of the 2009 annual meeting is a date that is not within 30 days
before or after May 22, 2009, notice by the shareholders of a proposal must be received a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy
materials.
Advance Notice Procedures for Director Nominations and Other
Business
Shareholders who intend to nominate
persons for election to our board of directors or to present a proposal at the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, if held, without inclusion of the
proposal in our proxy materials must provide advance written notice of such nomination or proposal in the manner required by our bylaws. Notice of
nominations or other business proposed to be considered by shareholders, complying with Sections 2.6 or 3.3, as applicable, of our bylaws, were
required to be delivered to the Corporate Secretary no earlier than February 21, 2009 and no later than March 23, 2009. However, if the date of the
2009 annual meeting is a date that is not within 30 days before or after May 22, 2009, notice by the shareholder must be delivered not later than the
close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to the annual meeting or (ii) the tenth day following the day on which the notice of the date
of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Notices should be sent to: Corporate Secretary, Eden Bioscience Corporation, 14522
NE North Woodinville Way, Suite 202B, Woodinville, Washington 98072.
For proposals that are not timely
filed, we retain discretion to vote proxies we receive. For such proposals that are timely filed, we retain discretion to vote proxies we receive
provided that (i) we include in our proxy statement advice on the nature of the proposal and how we intend to exercise our voting discretion and (ii)
the proponent does not issue a proxy statement.
OTHER BUSINESS
We know of no other business to be
presented at the special meeting, and no other matters properly may be presented for a vote at the special meeting. If any other business properly were
to come before the special meeting, it is intended that the shares represented by proxies would be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the
best judgment of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate
by reference information into this proxy statement, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to other
documents that we have filed separately with the SEC and delivered to you with this proxy statement. This proxy statement incorporates by reference our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 001-33510), as filed with the SEC on March 27, 2009.
Our annual report on Form 10-K contains
important information about us and our financial condition that is not set forth in this proxy statement. A copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 is being delivered with this proxy statement. In addition, this report has been filed with the SEC and may be accessed
from the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
57
Any statement contained in a document
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement will be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this proxy statement to the extent that
a statement contained in this proxy statement modifies or supersedes the statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed, except
as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this proxy statement.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Nathaniel T. Brown
Chief
Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
March 27, 2009
Woodinville, WA
58
Annex A
PLAN OF COMPLETE DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION
OF
EDEN BIOSCIENCE CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the shareholders of Eden
Bioscience Corporation, a Washington corporation (the Company), wish to accomplish the complete dissolution and liquidation of the
Company in accordance with Chapter 23B.14 and other applicable provisions of the Washington Business Corporation Act (the WBCA) and
Sections 331 and 336 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
1. |
|
Approval and Adoption of the Plan. This Plan of Complete
Dissolution and Liquidation (the Plan) shall become effective when all of the following steps have been completed: |
a) |
|
Resolutions of the Companys Board of
Directors. The Companys Board of Directors (the Board) shall have adopted a resolution or resolutions with respect to
the following: |
i) |
|
Complete Dissolution and Liquidation. The Board shall
determine that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders for the Company to be dissolved and liquidated
completely; |
ii) |
|
Adoption of the Plan. The Board shall approve the Plan as
the appropriate means for carrying out the complete dissolution and liquidation of the Company; |
iii) |
|
Recommend the Plan to Shareholders. The Board shall
recommend the Plan for approval by the shareholders of the Company; and |
iv) |
|
Disposition of Assets. The Board shall, as part of the
Plan, approve the sale, exchange or other disposition of all of the Companys remaining property and assets, on such terms and conditions and in
such manner as it deems necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders in order to facilitate
liquidation and distributions to the Companys creditors and shareholders, as appropriate. |
b) |
|
Approval of the Plan by the Companys
Shareholders. The holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Companys common stock, par value $0.0025 per share (the
Common Stock), entitled to vote thereon shall have approved the Plan at a special meeting of the shareholders of the Company called
for such purpose by the Board. The approval of the Plan by the requisite vote of the holders of the Common Stock shall constitute full and complete
authority for the Board and the officers of the Company, without further shareholder action, to proceed with the dissolution and liquidation of the
Company in accordance with any applicable provision of the WBCA, including without limitation, the authority to sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of
in liquidation all of the property and assets of the Company following the Effective Date (as defined in Section 2(a) below), whether such sale,
exchange or other disposition occurs in one transaction or a series of transactions. |
2. |
|
Dissolution and Liquidation Period. After approval and
adoption of the Plan in accordance with Section 1, the steps set forth below shall be completed at such times as the Board, in its discretion, deems
necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
Board may instruct the officers of the Company to delay the taking of any of the following steps until the Company has performed such actions as the
Board or such officers determine to be necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to maximize the
value of the Companys assets upon liquidation; provided that such steps may not be delayed longer than is permitted by applicable
law. |
A-1
a) |
|
The filing of Articles of Dissolution of the Company (the
Articles of Dissolution) pursuant to RCW 23B.14.030 (the date on which the Articles of Dissolution are filed are referred to herein
as the Effective Date), and the completion of all actions that may be necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of
the Company and its shareholders to wind up and liquidate its business and affairs; |
b) |
|
The publication of notice, in accordance with the terms of RCW
23B.14.030, of the Companys dissolution in a newspaper of general circulation in King County, Washington, within 30 days after the Effective
Date, which notice must be published once a week for three consecutive weeks; |
c) |
|
The mailing of written notice, in accordance with the terms of
RCW 23B.14.060, of the Companys dissolution to the holders of known claims (as defined in RCW 23B.14.060(3)) at any time after the publication of
notice as set forth in subparagraph (b) above; |
d) |
|
The cessation of all of the Companys business activities
and the withdrawal of the Company from any jurisdiction in which it is qualified to do business, except and insofar as appropriate for the sale or
other disposition of its property and assets and for the proper winding up and liquidation of the Company in accordance with the Plan and pursuant to
the WBCA; |
e) |
|
The collection and disposal of the Companys properties and
assets that will be applied toward satisfaction or making reasonable provision for satisfaction of the Companys liabilities or will otherwise not
be distributed in kind to its shareholders, in all cases subject to applicable liens and security interests and applicable contractual restrictions on
dispositions, pursuant to RCW 23B.14.050; |
f) |
|
The negotiation and consummation of sales or other dispositions
of all of the assets and properties of the Company, including the assumption by the purchaser or purchasers of any or all liabilities of the Company,
insofar as the Board deems such sales or dispositions to be necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders; |
g) |
|
As determined by the Board, the prosecution, defense, settlement
or other resolution of any and all claims or suits, whether civil, criminal or administrative, by or against the Company and the satisfaction of or the
making of reasonable provision for the satisfaction of any and all liabilities of the Company, whether arising in tort or by contract, statute, or
otherwise, and whether matured or unmatured, contingent, or conditional, by means of insurance coverage, provision of security therefor, contractual
assumptions thereof by a solvent person or any other means that the Board determines is reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction of the
reasonably estimated amount of such liabilities. Upon making such determination, the Board shall, for purposes of determining whether a subsequent
distribution to shareholders is prohibited under RCW 23B.06.400(2), be entitled to treat such liabilities as fully satisfied by the assets used or
committed in order to make such provision. For purposes of determining whether a distribution to shareholders is prohibited, the Board also shall be
entitled to disregard, and make no provision for the satisfaction of, any liabilities that are barred in accordance with RCW 23B.14.060(2), or that may
exceed any provision for their satisfaction ordered by a court pursuant to RCW 23B.14.065, or that the Board does not consider, based on the facts
known to it, reasonably likely to arise prior to expiration of the survival period specified in RCW 23B.14.340. Such liabilities shall be satisfied, or
the Board shall make reasonable provision for satisfying such liabilities, in accordance with their priorities as established by law, and on a pro rata
basis within each class of liabilities. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, if the Board deems it necessary, appropriate or
advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Board may (i) petition to have the dissolution continued under court
supervision in accordance with RCW 23B.14.300 or, to the extent the conditions of RCW 23B.14.050(4) may be applicable, dedicate the Companys
property and assets to the repayment of its creditors by making an assignment for the benefit of creditors or obtain the appointment of a general
receiver or (ii) file an application pursuant to RCW 23B.14.065 for a court determination of (a) the amount and form of reasonable provision to be made
for satisfaction of any one or more claims or liabilities that have arisen or that are reasonably likely to arise within the survival period specified
in RCW 23B.14.340 or (b) whether the provision made or proposed to be made by the Board for the satisfaction of any one or more claims or liabilities
is reasonable; |
A-2
h) |
|
Subject to the limitations of RCW 23B.06.400, the distribution
of the remaining funds of the Company and the distribution of the remaining unsold assets of the Company, if any, to its shareholders pursuant to
Sections 4 and 7 below; and |
i) |
|
The taking of any and all other actions permitted or required by
the WBCA and any other applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to, federal tax and securities laws and regulations and the NASDAQ
Marketplace Rules and regulations, in connection with the winding up and liquidation of the Company. |
3. |
|
Authority of Officers and Directors. Prior to and after
the Effective Date, the Board and the officers of the Company shall continue in their positions for the purpose of winding up the affairs of the
Company as contemplated by the WBCA. The Board may appoint officers, hire employees and retain independent contractors in connection with the winding
up process, and is authorized to pay to the Companys officers, directors, employees and independent contractors, or any of them, compensation or
additional compensation above their regular compensation, in money or other property, in recognition of the extraordinary efforts they, or any of them,
will be required to undertake, or actually undertake, in connection with the successful implementation of the Plan, provided that any such compensation
shall be fair and reasonable with respect to the efforts expended by any recipient of such compensation. Approval of the Plan by holders of at least
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute the approval of the Companys shareholders of the
Boards authorization of the payment of any such compensation. |
The approval of the Plan by the holders
of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute full and complete authority for the Board and the
officers of the Company, without further shareholder action, to do and perform any and all acts and to make, execute and deliver any and all
agreements, conveyances, assignments, transfers, certificates and other documents of any kind and character that the Board or such officers deem
necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders: (i) to dissolve the Company in accordance with the WBCA
and cause its withdrawal from all jurisdictions in which it and its subsidiaries are authorized to do business; (ii) to sell, dispose, convey, transfer
and deliver the property and assets of the Company; (iii) to prosecute, defend, settle or otherwise resolve any claims or suits by or against the
Company; (iv) to satisfy or make reasonable provision for the satisfaction of the Companys obligations and liabilities in accordance with any
applicable provision of the WBCA; (v) to distribute all of the remaining funds of the Company and any unsold assets of the Company pari passu to
the holders of the Common Stock; and (vi) to otherwise take any and all actions permitted or required by the WBCA and other applicable laws and
regulations to wind up and liquidate the Company.
4. |
|
Conversion of Assets Into Cash or Other Distributable
Form. Subject to approval by the Board, the officers, employees and agents of the Company shall, as promptly as feasible, proceed to collect all
sums due or owing to the Company, to sell and convert into cash or other distributable form any and all property and assets of the Company and to (a)
pay, satisfy and discharge, or make reasonable provision for the payment, satisfaction and discharge of, any and all liabilities of the Company
pursuant to Section 2 above, including all expenses associated with the defense, prosecution, settlement or other resolution of any claims or suits by
or against the Company, the sale or other disposition of the Companys property and assets, and the dissolution and liquidation provided for by
the Plan, and (b) make distributions to shareholders pursuant to Section 7 below. |
A-3
5. |
|
Professional Fees and Expenses. It is specifically
contemplated that the Company will retain a law firm or law firms selected by the Board to provide legal advice and guidance in implementing the Plan,
and the Company shall pay all legal fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the Company in connection with or arising out of the implementation of the
Plan, including, among other things, the prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolutions of any claims or suits by or against the Company, the
discharge of obligations and liabilities of the Company, and the advancement and reimbursement of any legal fees and expenses payable by the Company
pursuant to the indemnification provided by the Company in its Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Third Amended and Restated Bylaws,
the WBCA, or otherwise. |
In addition, in connection with and for
the purpose of implementing and assuring completion of the Plan, the Company may, as the Board determine necessary, appropriate or advisable in the
best interests of the Company and its shareholders, engage and pay any brokerage, agency, professional and other reasonable fees and expenses of
persons rendering services to the Company in connection with the collection, sale, exchange or other disposition of the Companys property and
assets, the implementation of the Plan and the winding up and liquidation of the Company.
6. |
|
Indemnification. The Company shall continue to indemnify
its officers, directors, employees and agents in accordance with its Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and Third Amended and Restated
Bylaws, the WBCA, or otherwise, for actions taken in connection with the Plan and the winding up of the affairs of the Company. The Board is authorized
to obtain and maintain insurance as it may be necessary, appropriate or advisable in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to cover
any of the Companys obligations under the Plan, including without limitation, directors and officers liability coverage and insurance
coverage reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction of reasonably estimated liability claims under RCW 23B.14.050(3). |
7. |
|
Liquidating Distributions. Liquidating distributions, in
cash or in kind, shall be made from time to time after the Effective Date to the holders of record of the shares of Common Stock of the Company
outstanding at the close of business on the Effective Date, pro rata in accordance with the respective number of shares then held of record; provided
that, prior to any such distribution, the Board has made a determination that reasonable provision has been made for the payment, satisfaction and
discharge of all known, conditional, unmatured or contingent debts, obligations and liabilities of the Company (including costs and expenses incurred
and anticipated to be incurred in connection with the prosecution, defense, settlement or other resolution of any claims or suits by or against the
Company, the sale of property and assets, and the complete liquidation of the Company) by means reasonably calculated to provide for satisfaction of
the reasonably estimated amount of such liabilities. All determinations as to the time for and the amount and kind of liquidating distributions shall
be made in the exercise of the absolute discretion of the Board and in accordance with any applicable provision of the WBCA. As provided in Section 10
below, distributions made pursuant to the Plan are intended to be treated as distributions made in complete liquidation of the Company within the
meaning of Sections 331 and 336 of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder. |
If any liquidating distribution to
shareholders of the Company cannot be made pursuant to the Plan, whether because the shareholder cannot be located, has not surrendered its
certificates evidencing the Common Stock as may be required pursuant to Section 9 below, is not competent to receive the distribution, or for any other
reason, then the distribution to which such shareholder is entitled shall be transferred, at such time as the final liquidating distribution is made by
the Company, to the Washington State Treasurer or the official of such state or other jurisdiction authorized or permitted by applicable law to receive
the proceeds of such distribution. The proceeds of such distribution shall thereafter be held solely for the benefit of and for ultimate distribution
to such shareholder as the sole equitable owner thereof and shall be treated as abandoned property and escheat to the applicable state or other
jurisdiction in accordance with applicable law. In no event shall the proceeds of any such distribution revert to or become the property of the
Company.
8. |
|
Amendment, Modification or Abandonment of the Plan. If
for any reason the Board determines that such action would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, the Board may, in its sole
discretion and without further shareholder approval, revoke the Plan and all actions contemplated |
A-4
|
|
hereunder, to the extent and in the manner permitted by the WBCA,
(i) at any time prior to the Effective Date, or (ii) at any time within 120 days after the Effective Date. The Board may not amend or modify the Plan
under circumstances that would require additional shareholder approval under the WBCA and/or the federal securities laws or NASDAQ requirements without
complying with the WBCA and/or the federal securities laws or NASDAQ requirements. Upon the effective date of revocation of dissolution, the Plan shall
be void. |
9. |
|
Cancellation of Stock and Stock Certificates. The
distributions to the Companys shareholders pursuant to Section 7 hereof shall be in complete cancellation of all of the outstanding shares of the
Common Stock. From and after the Effective Date, and subject to applicable law, the Common Stock will be treated as no longer being outstanding and
each holder of Common Stock shall cease to have any rights in respect thereof, except the right to receive distributions pursuant to and in accordance
with Section 7 hereof. As a condition to delivery of any distribution to the Companys shareholders, the Board, in its absolute discretion, may
require the Companys shareholders to (i) surrender their certificates evidencing their shares of Common Stock to the Company, or (ii) furnish the
Company with evidence satisfactory to the Board of the loss, theft or destruction of such certificates, together with such surety bond or other
security or indemnity as may be required by and satisfactory to the Board. The Company will close its stock transfer books and discontinue recording
transfers of shares of stock of the Company at the Effective Date, and thereafter certificates representing shares of Common Stock will not be
assignable or transferable on the books of the Company except by will, intestate succession, or operation of law. |
10. |
|
Liquidation Under Code Sections 331 and 336. It is
intended that the Plan constitutes a plan of complete liquidation of the Company within the meaning of Sections 331 and 336 of the Code. The Plan shall
be deemed to authorize the taking of such action as, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, may be necessary to conform with the provisions of Code
Sections 331 and 336 and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, including, without limitation, the making of an election under Section 336(e)
of the Code, if applicable. |
11. |
|
Filing of Tax Returns, Forms and Other Reports and
Statements. The appropriate officers of the Company are authorized and directed to prepare (or cause to be prepared), execute and file (or cause to
be filed) in accordance with all applicable laws such returns, forms, reports and information statements, and any schedules or attachments to any of
the foregoing, as may be necessary or appropriate or required under applicable law in connection with the Plan and the carrying out thereof, including,
without limitation, Internal Revenue Service Form 966 as provided under Section 6043 of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder. |
A-5
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by
the undersigned shareholder(s). PROXY CARDS PROPERLY EXECUTED AND RETURNED WITHOUT DIRECTION WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2.
|
|
Please mark your votes as indicated in this example |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
1. |
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION AND
LIQUIDATION OF THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO THE PLAN OF
COMPLETE DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION. |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Your vote is important. Prompt return of this proxy card will
help save the expense of additional solicitation efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
2. |
PROPOSAL TO ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING TO ANOTHER
DATE, TIME OR PLACE, IF NECESSARY IN THE JUDGEMENT OF
THE PROXY HOLDERS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITING
ADDITIONAL PROXIES TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 1. |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon
such other business as may properly come before the
special meeting and any adjournments or postponements
thereof. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice
of Special Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement
relating thereto. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Here for Address 0 Change or Comments SEE REVERSE |
Signature |
|
Signature |
|
Date |
|
|
NOTE: Please sign above exactly as your name or names appear on your stock certificate. Joint owners should each sign. When signing
as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian,
please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a
partnership please sign in partnership name by an authorized person. |
5
FOLD AND DETACH HERE 5 |
WE
ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING,
BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
Internet
and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to the special meeting date.
EDEN BIOSCIENCE CORPORATION
Proxies granted pursuant to Internet or telephone voting are valid under Washington law.
|
|
INTERNET
http://www.proxyvoting.com/eden
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when
you access the web site.
OR
TELEPHONE
1-866-540-5760
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote
your proxy. Have your proxy card in
hand when you call.
If you vote
your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy
card.
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. Your Internet or telephone vote
authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked,
signed and returned your proxy card.
|
Eden Bioscience Corporation
PROXY FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 20, 2009
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Nathaniel T. Brown and William T. Weyerhaeuser (collectively, the
“Proxies”), and each of them, with full power of substitution, as proxies to represent and to vote,
as designated on the reverse side, all the voting shares of Eden Bioscience Corporation common stock
held of record by the undersigned on March 23, 2009, at the Special Meeting of Shareholders of
Eden Bioscience Corporation to be held at the Country Inn & Suites By Carlson, 19333 North Creek Parkway, Bothell, WA 98011 on May 20, 2009 at
9 a.m. (Pacific Time), or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Such shares shall be voted
as indicated with respect to the proposals listed on the reverse side hereof, or if no indication is
made, shall be voted in favor of the proposals, and in the Proxies’ discretion on such other
business as may properly come before the special meeting and any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
|
|
|
BNY MELLON SHAREOWNER
SERVICES P.O. BOX 3550 SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250 |
|
|
Address
Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse
side) |
|
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the reverse side) |
You can now access your Eden Bioscience Corporation account online.
Access your Eden Bioscience Corporation shareholder account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD).
The transfer agent for Eden Bioscience Corporation now makes it easy and convenient to get current
information on your shareholder account.
• View account status • View certificate history • View book-entry information |
• View payment history for dividends • Make address changes • Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form • Establish/change your PIN |
Visit us on the web at http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd
For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd
Investor ServiceDirect®
Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week
TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163
Choose MLinkSM
for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials,
investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor
ServiceDirect® at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd where
step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment. |