UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-06416
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Alan M. Meder | Lawrence R. Hamilton, Esq. | |
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. | Mayer Brown LLP | |
200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500 | 71 South Wacker Drive | |
Chicago, Illinois 60606 | Chicago, Illinois 60606 |
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 1-800-338-8214
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2015
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
The Annual Report to Stockholders follows.
Board of Directors
David J. Vitale, Chairman
Donald C. Burke
Stewart E. Conner
Robert J. Genetski
Philip R. McLoughlin
Geraldine M. McNamara
Eileen A. Moran
Nathan I. Partain, CFA
Christian H. Poindexter
Carl F. Pollard
Officers
Nathan I. Partain, CFA, President & Chief Executive Officer
Timothy M. Heaney, CFA, Vice President & Chief Investment Officer
Lisa H. Leonard, Vice President
William J. Renahan, Vice President & Secretary
Dianna P. Wengler, Vice President & Assistant Secretary
Alan M. Meder, CFA, CPA, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
Joyce B. Riegel, Chief Compliance Officer
Daniel J. Petrisko, CFA, Assistant Secretary
Investment Adviser
Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co.
200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500
Chicago, IL 60606
Call toll-free (800) 243-4361 ext. 4941
(860) 263-4941
www.dpimc.com
Administrator
J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC
500 West Jefferson Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Call toll-free (888) 878-7845
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
Call toll-free (800) 937-5449
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Legal Counsel
Mayer Brown LLP
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
DTF Tax-Free
Income Inc.
Annual Report
October 31, 2015
LETTER TO
SHAREHOLDERS
December 18, 2015
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
THE CURRENT MUNICIPAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT AND YOUR FUND:
We begin our discussion of the performance of DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (the DTF Fund) with a review of the municipal market environment in which the DTF Fund operates.
The municipal bond market experienced mixed performance over the twelve months ended October 31, 2015, as tax-free interest rates ended this time period relatively close to where they began. For the twelve months ended October 31, 2015, municipal bonds with maturities between 7 and 11 years experienced a decline in interest rates of 1 to 5 basis points while all other maturities up to 30 years saw rates unchanged or higher by up to 18 basis points. This modest movement in rates during these twelve months produced similarly modest returns for bonds with maturities of 5 years or longer as reported by various Barclays maturity-based indices. The range of returns for the Barclays indices for bonds with maturities of 5 years and longer was between 2.18% and 2.54%. This tight range of returns for the Barclays indexes was mostly due to the markets uncertainty regarding the timing of a decision by the Federal Open Market Committee (the Fed), the committee within the Federal Reserve that sets domestic monetary policy, to raise the target federal funds rate. Over the twelve months ended October 31, 2015, the municipal market was influenced by several factors including:
| volatile U.S. Treasury bond yields driven by the increasing probability that the Fed will raise the target federal funds rate in 2015; |
| higher issuance levels of municipal bonds compared to recent years due to increased use of refinancings by issuers; and |
| flows in and out of open-end municipal bond mutual funds due to the general uncertainty regarding the direction of interest rates. |
ELEVATED SUPPLY
The market experienced elevated new bond issuance in 2015 as municipalities continued to take advantage of low interest rates to refinance their outstanding, higher cost debt. The higher supply of new issuances was offset by strong demand from the reinvestment of coupon and maturities, resulting in more bonds maturing or being called than were being issued. In addition, less money was borrowed to finance new projects across the country. While significant spending is needed to repair or replace aging infrastructure, new municipal bond issuance remains muted, as there continues to be tepid support from taxpayers for municipalities to take on additional debt in order to pay for infrastructure projects. Despite this elevated pace of new issuance compared to recent history, municipals have still performed reasonably well.
MIXED DEMAND
Open-end municipal bond mutual funds experienced mixed flows [calendar year-to-date] through October 31, 2015. After experiencing strong inflows during the first four months of the year, outflows began to occur in May and persisted through the end of September. October saw this trend reverse as the Fed decided not to move the target federal funds rate at its September meeting. The odds for an initial tightening move by the Fed increased materially after the October employment report was released on November 6. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, both payroll and wage growth were better than
1
expected in October; November employment data released in early December reinforced this stronger trend. As a result, the Fed raised the federal funds rate target by 25 basis points at their meeting in mid-December. We expect that the members of the Fed will continue to analyze data released in coming months to decide on further policy actions that may be taken in 2016. Since flows in and out of open-end mutual funds influence the overall demand for municipal bonds, the near-term performance of the municipal bond market and future demand will likely be dependent on future Fed actions regarding interest rates, as interest rates tend to be the biggest driver of investor demand. Despite the varied demand from mutual fund investors, the market has benefited from increased demand from households through the use of separately managed accounts and from banks purchasing bonds on a proprietary basis. These additional sources of demand have helped stabilize the municipal market, especially during periods of weak mutual fund demand.
STEADY CREDIT
Setting aside recent headline news out of Puerto Rico and Chicago, the general credit picture for the municipal market is improving. State tax revenue collections continue to grow, with the latest numbers through the second quarter of 2015 showing year-over-year growth of 6.8%, marking the 22nd of the past 23 quarters of growth. That said, understanding the fundamental strength of each individual issuer is extremely important as the municipal market is no longer characterized as a homogenous commodity. In 2009, more than 50% of the bonds in the municipal market were rated AAA. Today, largely because of the demise of the AAA rated bond insurers, that number has dropped to only 11%. While tax collections have grown following the recession, municipalities continue to deal with challenges due to underfunded pensions and their ability to enact meaningful reform, growing capital improvement projects required to meet changing Federal regulations and industry changes, and variable economic conditions. Therefore, avoiding credit problems when selecting bonds for the portfolio continues to be important to portfolio performance.
In managing the DTF Fund, we continue to emphasize an investment strategy of owning mostly AA and A rated revenue bonds with coupons of 5% or higher. These higher-coupon bonds have provided the DTF Fund with an attractive level of income while also helping to insulate the portfolio from the potential impact of higher interest rates. As of October 31, 2015, the DTF Fund held over 90% of its total assets in municipal bonds rated A or higher across multiple sectors. Transportation, healthcare, water & sewer, general obligation and special tax bonds represented the DTF Funds top five exposures. However, the Funds allocation to general obligation bonds compared to revenue bonds remains lower, as we continue to favor the predictable revenue streams and more settled legal structure afforded by revenue bonds. The DTF Fund continues to be well diversified geographically, with exposure to 32 states and the District of Columbia. The DTF Fund continues to avoid bonds issued by the financially troubled Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or any of its agencies. We continue to be diversified across maturities in order to help moderate the portfolios risk from potential changes in interest rates and potential changes to the shape of the yield curve that could result from future Fed actions or changing investor sentiment.
In addition to the risk of disruptions in the broader credit market, the level of interest rates can be a primary driver of bond fund total returns, including the DTF Funds returns. For example, an extended environment of historically low interest rates adds an element of reinvestment risk, since the proceeds of maturing bonds may need to be reinvested in lower-yielding securities. Alternatively, a sudden or unexpected rise in interest rates would likely reduce the total return of bond funds, since higher interest rates could be expected to depress the valuations of fixed-rate bonds held in a portfolio.
Maturity and duration are measures of the sensitivity of a funds portfolio of investments to changes in interest rates. More specifically, duration refers to the percentage change in a bonds price for a given change in rates (typically +/- 100 basis points). In general, the greater the average maturity and duration of a portfolio, the greater is the potential percentage price volatility for a given change in interest rates. As of October 31, 2015, the DTF Funds portfolio of investments had an average maturity of 15.8 years and duration of 7.17 years, while the Barclays Municipal Bond Index had an average maturity of 13.1 years and duration of 6.66 years.
As a practical matter, it is not possible for the DTF Fund to be completely insulated from turmoil in the global financial markets or unexpected moves in interest rates. However, management believes that over the long term the diversification of the portfolio across multiple states and sectors, in addition to the distribution of assets along the yield curve, positions the DTF Fund to take advantage of future opportunities while limiting volatility to some degree.
2
OUTLOOK
We expect the markets technical condition to remain positive over the next several months, due mostly to a slowdown in the issuance of municipal bonds from the elevated pace experienced in the first half of the year. Municipal bonds continue to offer reasonably good value, especially when compared to other asset classes on a taxable equivalent basis. The municipal market will likely track interest rate changes in U.S. Treasury bonds moving forward, but with far less volatility as demonstrated in the late summer months of 2015. Overall, we expect fundamentals to continue to improve as a result of higher tax collection revenues, especially given the steady increase seen in individual income taxes, which make up about half of state tax collections.
FUND PERFORMANCE:
The following table compares the DTF Funds total return and the Barclays Municipal Bond Index:
Total Return1 For the period indicated through October 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
One Year | Three Years (annualized) |
Five Years (annualized) |
||||||||||
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. |
||||||||||||
Market Value2 |
5.5 | % | -0.3 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Net Asset Value3 |
2.8 | % | 3.1 | % | 5.2 | % | ||||||
Barclays Municipal Bond Index4 |
2.9 | % | 2.9 | % | 4.3 | % |
1. | Past performance is not indicative of future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance in historical periods. |
2. | Total return on market value assumes a purchase of common stock at the opening market price on the first business day and a sale at the closing market price on the last business day of each period shown in the table and assumes reinvestment of dividends at the actual reinvestment prices obtained under the terms of the DTF Funds dividend reinvestment plan. In addition, when buying or selling stock, you would ordinarily pay brokerage expenses. Because brokerage expenses are not reflected in the above calculations, your total return net of brokerage expenses would be lower than the total returns on market value shown in the table. Source: Administrator of the DTF Fund. |
3. | Total return on NAV uses the same methodology as is described in note 2, but with use of NAV for beginning, ending and reinvestment values. Because the DTF Funds expenses (detailed on page 12 of this report) reduce the DTF Funds NAV, they are already reflected in the DTF Funds total return on NAV shown in the table. NAV represents the underlying value of the DTF Funds net assets, but the market price per share may be higher or lower than the NAV. Source: Administrator of the DTF Fund. |
4. | The index is a market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the long-term tax-exempt bond market. The index is calculated on a total return basis with dividends reinvested. The index is unmanaged, its returns do not reflect any fees, expenses, or sales charges, and it is not available for direct investment. Source: Barclays. |
As presented in the performance chart above, the DTF Fund provided its shareholders with a solid return for the twelve months ended October 31, 2015 especially when compared to the overall municipal bond market as measured by the Barclays Municipal Bond Index. As of October 31, 2015, the DTF Fund was paying a $0.84 per share annualized dividend and had a closing price of $15.13 per share. This monthly dividend translates into a taxable equivalent yield of 9.8% for an individual subject to the top federal tax bracket of 39.6% and the 3.8% Medicare tax. This taxable equivalent yield equates to over 760 basis points above the yield available on a 10-year taxable U.S. Treasury bond as of October 31, 2015. The DTF Fund has maintained its $0.07 per share monthly dividend since January 2012, despite generational low yields available in the tax-exempt bond market for extended periods over the past few years. The principal reason the Fund has been able to maintain this dividend is due to the benefit of leverage and use of undistributed net income. During this period, common shareholders have benefited from a steep municipal yield curve that has allowed the DTF Fund to pay a low rate on its leverage while investing the proceeds into higher-yielding bonds. However, the relationship between the cost of leverage and investment returns could change in the future, especially if the Fed begins raising the target federal funds rate, as it is expected to do. If leverage costs were to move higher, the Fund could see its balance of undistributed net income decline further, which could make it more difficult to maintain the current dividend rate, with the possibility that this rate could even decrease.
3
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
At the regular December 2015 meeting of the Funds Board of Directors (the Board), the Board declared the following monthly dividends:
Cents Per Share |
Record Date |
Payable Date | ||
7.0 |
January 15 | January 29 | ||
7.0 |
February 16 | February 29 | ||
7.0 |
March 15 | March 31 |
ABOUT YOUR FUND:
The Funds investment objective is current income exempt from regular federal income tax consistent with the preservation of capital. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily (at least 80% of its total assets) in a diversified portfolio of investment-grade tax-exempt obligations. The Fund may not invest more than 25% of its total assets (taken at market value at the time of each investment) in the securities of issuers in a single industry; provided that, for purposes of this restriction, tax exempt securities of issuers that are states, municipalities or their political subdivisions are not considered to be the securities of issuers in any single industry.
The use of leverage enables the Fund to borrow at short-term rates and invest at longer-term rates. As of October 31, 2015, the Funds leverage consisted of $65 million of Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (VMTP). On that date, the total amount of leverage represented approximately 32% of the Funds total assets. The amount and type of leverage used is reviewed by the Board of Directors based on the Funds expected earnings relative to the anticipated costs (including fees and expenses) associated with the leverage. In addition, the long-term expected benefits of leverage are weighed against the potential effect of increasing the volatility of both the Funds net asset value and the market value of its common stock. Historically, the tendency of the U.S. yield curve to exhibit a positive slope (i.e., long-term rates higher than short-term rates) has fostered an environment in which leverage can make a positive contribution to the earnings of the Fund. There is no assurance that this will continue to be the case in the future. A decline in the difference between short-term and long-term rates could have an adverse effect on the income provided from leverage. Prolonged periods of low longer-term interest rates can result in modest reinvestment opportunities for the fixed income portion of the portfolio and could also adversely affect the income provided from leverage. If the use of leverage were to cease being beneficial, the amount and type of leverage employed by the Fund could potentially be modified or eliminated.
We continue to appreciate your interest in the DTF Fund and look forward to being of continued service in the future.
Timothy M. Heaney, CFA Chief Investment Officer | Nathan I. Partain, CFA Director, President & Chief Executive Officer |
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements. Discussions of specific investments are for illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein, are those of the portfolio managers as of the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The DTF Fund disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.
4
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
October 31, 2015
Principal Amount (000) |
Description (a) |
Value (Note 2) |
||||||
|
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS142.6% |
|||||||
Alaska0.2% | ||||||||
$290 | Anchorage Elec. Util. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/36, Ser. A |
$326,726 | |||||||
Arizona6.3% | ||||||||
650 | Arizona St. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev., Scottsdale Lincoln Hosp. Proj., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/42, Ser. A |
712,056 | |||||||
2,000 | Arizona St. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev., Banner Hlth., |
|||||||
4.00%, 1/1/44, Ser. A |
2,026,380 | |||||||
2,000 | Arizona St. Trans. Brd. Hwy. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/30, Ser. B, |
2,220,840 | |||||||
500 | Northern Arizona Univ. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/1/40, Series 2014 |
557,385 | |||||||
1,000 | Northern Arizona Univ. Speed Rev. Stimulus Plan for Econ. Edl. Dev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/1/38, Series 2013 |
1,111,070 | |||||||
2,000 | Salt River Proj. Agric. Impvt. & Pwr. Dist. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/38, Ser. A 2008 |
2,148,380 | |||||||
8,776,111 | ||||||||
California18.1% | ||||||||
2,000 | Bay Area Toll Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.125%, 4/1/39, Ser. F-1, |
2,285,740 | |||||||
500 | California St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.50%, 3/1/26 |
553,840 | |||||||
1,000 | California St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
6.00%, 4/1/38 |
1,164,350 | |||||||
500 | California St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.50%, 3/1/40 |
576,145 | |||||||
100 | California St. Muni. Fin. Auth. Student Hsg. Rev., Bowles Hall Foundation, |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/01/35, Ser. A |
109,310 | |||||||
1,000 | California St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00% 10/1/28 |
1,185,780 | |||||||
2,000 | California St. Pub. Wks. Brd. Lease Rev. Dept. of Corrections and Rehab., |
|||||||
5.250%, 9/1/29, Ser. F |
2,378,160 | |||||||
2,000 | California Statewide Communities Dev. Auth. Rev., St. Joseph Hlth. Syst., |
|||||||
5.75%, 7/1/47, FGIC |
2,206,900 | |||||||
$3,000 | Golden St. Tobacco Securitization Corp. Rev., |
|||||||
5.75%, 6/1/47, Ser. A-1 |
$2,748,090 | |||||||
1,000 | Los Angeles Cnty. Santn. Dists. Fin. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/34, Ser. A |
1,155,610 | |||||||
1,000 | Manteca City Wtr. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/33 |
1,136,700 | |||||||
1,520 | Oakland Unified School District |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/01/30 |
1,744,838 | |||||||
2,500 | Riverside Cnty. Sngl. Fam. Rev., |
|||||||
7.80%, 5/1/21, Ser. A, |
3,304,375 | |||||||
780 | Sacramento Successor Agy. to Redev. Agy., Tax Allocation, |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/01/24, Ser. A |
934,557 | |||||||
1,215 | San Marcos Successor Agy. to Redev. Agy. Tax Allocation, |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/01/32, Ser. A |
1,400,713 | |||||||
2,000 | San Mateo Successor Agy. to Redev. Agy. Tax Allocation, |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/1/30, Ser. A |
2,256,540 | |||||||
25,141,648 | ||||||||
Colorado0.8% | ||||||||
1,000 | Eagle River Wtr. & Sanitation Dist. Enterprise Wstwtr. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/42 |
1,099,310 | |||||||
Connecticut3.3% | ||||||||
1,000 | Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., Eastern CT Hlth. Network, |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/25, Ser. C, AGT |
1,001,580 | |||||||
700 | Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., Hartford HealthCare, |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/32, Ser. A |
760,662 | |||||||
1,000 | Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., Hartford HealthCare, |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/41, Ser. A |
1,083,440 | |||||||
550 | Connecticut St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev. Yale-New Haven Hospital, |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/48, Ser. N |
604,417 | |||||||
1,000 | South Central Connecticut Reg. Wtr. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/1/41, Ser. 26 |
1,130,210 | |||||||
4,580,309 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Principal Amount (000) |
Description (a) |
Value (Note 2) |
||||||
District of Columbia1.6% | ||||||||
$1,000 | District of Columbia Inc. Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/31, Ser. A |
$1,141,150 | |||||||
1,000 | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/18, Ser. A, |
1,080,830 | |||||||
2,221,980 | ||||||||
Florida14.6% | ||||||||
1,500 | Broward Cnty. Port Fac. Rev., |
|||||||
6.00%, 9/1/23, Ser. A |
1,747,845 | |||||||
1,000 | Escambia Cnty. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev., Baptist Hosp., |
|||||||
6.00%, 8/15/36 |
1,131,490 | |||||||
2,000 | Florida St. Brd. of Ed. Cap. Outlay Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/1/41, Ser. F |
2,218,380 | |||||||
2,350 | Florida St. Brd. of Gov. Florida State Univ. Dorm Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 5/1/33, Ser. A |
2,648,521 | |||||||
70 | Highlands Cnty. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev., Adventist Hlth., |
|||||||
5.125%, 11/15/32, Ser. G, |
73,444 | |||||||
1,930 | Highlands Cnty. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev., Adventist Hlth., |
|||||||
5.125%, 11/15/32, Ser. G |
2,024,956 | |||||||
1,000 | Hillsborough Cnty. Aviation Auth., Tampa Int'l. Arpt., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/44 |
1,078,260 | |||||||
500 | Lee Cnty. Tran. Fac. Ref. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/35, AGM |
565,615 | |||||||
1,080 | Miami Beach Hlth. Facs. Auth. Hosp. Rev. Ref., |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/15/39 |
1,170,623 | |||||||
250 | Miami-Dade Cnty. Ed. Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 4/1/45 |
271,907 | |||||||
250 | Miami-Dade Cnty. Aviation Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/32, Ser. A |
273,085 | |||||||
1,000 | Miami-Dade Cnty. Wtr. & Swr. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/01/26 |
1,209,370 | |||||||
2,000 | Orlando and Orange Cnty. Expwy. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/35, Ser. A |
2,250,260 | |||||||
$1,000 | Reedy Creek Impvt. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/1/38, Ser. A |
$1,118,930 | |||||||
2,000 | Seminole Cnty. Sales Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.25%, 10/1/31, Ser. B, NRE |
2,496,860 | |||||||
20,279,546 | ||||||||
Georgia5.3% | ||||||||
300 | Atlanta Wtr. & Wstwtr. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/1/26 |
362,379 | |||||||
500 | Atlanta Arpt. Passenger Fac. Charge Gen. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/32, Ser. A |
567,690 | |||||||
2,000 | Fulton Cnty. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.375%, 1/1/16 |
2,017,840 | |||||||
1,970 | Georgia St. Mun. Elec. Auth. Pwr. Rev., |
|||||||
6.50%, 1/1/20, Ser. X, AMBAC |
2,166,232 | |||||||
2,000 | Metro. Atlanta Rapid Tran. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/39, Ser. 3 |
2,231,920 | |||||||
7,346,061 | ||||||||
Idaho0.8% | ||||||||
1,065 | Idaho St. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. St. Lukes Hlth. Sys. Proj., |
|||||||
5.00%, 3/1/34, Ser. A |
1,161,883 | |||||||
Illinois12.2% | ||||||||
500 | Chicago Multi-Family Hsg. Rev., |
|||||||
4.90%, 3/20/44, FHA |
507,800 | |||||||
1,000 | Chicago O'Hare Intl. Arpt. Rev. Customer Fac. Charge, |
|||||||
5.125%, 1/1/30, AGM |
1,125,480 | |||||||
250 | Chicago Sales Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/30 |
258,532 | |||||||
1,500 | Chicago Wstwtr. Trans. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/34, Ser. C |
1,595,160 | |||||||
500 | Chicago Wtrwks. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/1/44 |
522,480 | |||||||
1,000 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Ed. Rev., IL Charter School, |
|||||||
5.375%, 9/1/32, Ser. C, |
1,087,500 | |||||||
1,000 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., Swedish Covenant Hosp., |
|||||||
6.00%, 8/15/38, Ser. A |
1,107,160 | |||||||
1,225 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., Advocate HealthCare Network, |
|||||||
5.00%, 5/01/45 |
1,350,587 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Principal Amount (000) |
Description (a) |
Value (Note 2) |
||||||
$1,000 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., Rush Univ. Med. Ctr., |
|||||||
4.00%, 11/15/39, Ser. A |
$1,005,510 | |||||||
520 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., Northwestern Memorial HealthCare, |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/15/37 |
571,043 | |||||||
1,000 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., Rush Univ. Med. Ctr., |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/15/39 |
1,100,320 | |||||||
525 | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., Centegra Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.00%, 9/1/42, Ser. A |
556,904 | |||||||
2,000 | Illinois St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.50%, 1/1/29 |
2,263,000 | |||||||
1,500 | Illinois St. Toll Hwy. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.50%, 1/1/33, Ser. B |
1,629,915 | |||||||
1,000 | Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
6.00%, 6/1/28 |
1,185,930 | |||||||
1,000 | Univ. of Illinois Aux. Facs. Sys. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 4/1/34, Ser. A |
1,101,640 | |||||||
16,968,961 | ||||||||
Indiana2.7% | ||||||||
180 | Indiana St. Fin. Auth. Hospital Rev., Parkview Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.875%, 5/1/29, Ser. A |
180,585 | |||||||
240 | Indiana St. Fin. Auth. Hospital Rev., Indiana Univ. Hlth., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/28, Ser. A |
283,150 | |||||||
1,000 | Indiana St. Fin. Auth. Rev. State Revolving Fund, |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/1/31, Ser. B |
1,153,570 | |||||||
2,000 | Indianapolis Local Pub. Impvt. Bond Bank Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/1/38, Ser. A |
2,187,700 | |||||||
3,805,005 | ||||||||
Louisiana5.4% | ||||||||
305 | Louisiana St. Gasoline & Fuels Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 5/1/41, Ser. A, |
312,198 | |||||||
695 | Louisiana St. Gasoline & Fuels Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 5/1/41, Ser. A, |
711,402 | |||||||
$1,250 | Louisiana Stadium & Exposition Dist., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/30, Ser. A |
$1,412,775 | |||||||
500 | Louisiana Stadium & Exposition Dist., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/36, Ser. A |
552,165 | |||||||
1,250 | Louisiana St. Tran. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/15/38, Ser. A |
1,396,713 | |||||||
250 | New Orleans Swr. Svc. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/1/44 |
273,135 | |||||||
500 | Port of New Orleans Board of Commissioners Port Fac. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 4/1/33, Ser. B |
541,150 | |||||||
1,100 | Regional Tran. Auth. Sales Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/30, AGM |
1,245,376 | |||||||
1,000 | Terrebonne Parish Consol. Wtrwks. Dist. No. 1, |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/1/37, Ser. A |
1,107,500 | |||||||
7,552,414 | ||||||||
Maine2.1% | ||||||||
1,000 | Maine St. Hlth. & Hgr. Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/33, Ser. A |
1,098,670 | |||||||
500 | Maine St. Hlth. & Hgr. Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., Eastern Maine Med. Ctr., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/43 |
528,320 | |||||||
610 | Portland, General Arpt. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/31 |
661,655 | |||||||
540 | Portland, General Arpt. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/32 |
584,226 | |||||||
2,872,871 | ||||||||
Maryland3.8% | ||||||||
1,000 | Maryland St. Hlth. & Hgr. Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., Anne Arundel Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/39 |
1,090,960 | |||||||
2,000 | Maryland St. Hlth. & Hgr. Edl. Facs. Auth. Rev., MedStar Hlth., |
|||||||
4.00%, 8/15/45 |
1,979,280 | |||||||
2,000 | Maryland St. Trans. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/37, AGM |
2,180,560 | |||||||
5,250,800 | ||||||||
Massachusetts7.4% | ||||||||
3,000 | Massachusetts Bay Trans. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.50%, 7/1/29, Ser. B, NRE |
3,930,600 | |||||||
1,000 | Massachusetts St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.50%, 8/1/30, Ser. A, AMBAC |
1,285,130 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Principal Amount (000) |
Description (a) |
Value (Note 2) |
||||||
$1,000 | Massachusetts St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.25%, 9/1/25, Ser. B |
$1,272,800 | |||||||
2,000 | Massachusetts St. College Bldg. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 5/1/40, Ser. B |
2,268,860 | |||||||
1,500 | Massachusetts St. Dev. Fin. Agcy. Solid Waste Disp. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/1/36, |
1,551,000 | |||||||
10,308,390 | ||||||||
Michigan1.4% | ||||||||
500 | Detroit Dist. St. Aid Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.25%, 11/1/35 |
535,570 | |||||||
1,000 | Holland Elec. Util. Sys. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/39, Ser. A |
1,130,550 | |||||||
225 | Royal Oak Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. William Beaumont Hosp., |
|||||||
5.00%, 9/1/39, Ser. D |
245,133 | |||||||
1,911,253 | ||||||||
Nebraska3.0% | ||||||||
500 | Nebraska St. Pub. Pwr. Dist. Gen. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/34, Ser. A |
559,505 | |||||||
2,000 | Omaha Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.25%, 4/1/27 |
2,546,860 | |||||||
1,035 | Omaha Pub. Pwr. Dist. Elec. Rev., |
|||||||
6.20%, 2/1/17, Ser. B, |
1,077,497 | |||||||
4,183,862 | ||||||||
Nevada1.6% | ||||||||
2,165 | Clark Cnty. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/1/22, AMBAC |
2,165,281 | |||||||
20 | Nevada St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/24, Ser. F, AGM |
20,043 | |||||||
2,185,324 | ||||||||
New Jersey2.6% | ||||||||
400 | Camden Cnty. Impvt. Auth. Hlthcare. Redev. Rev., Cooper Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/15/33, Ser. A |
428,552 | |||||||
2,000 | New Jersey St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.25%, 7/1/17, Ser. H |
2,138,280 | |||||||
1,000 | New Jersey St. Tpk. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/36, Ser. H |
1,097,160 | |||||||
3,663,992 | ||||||||
New York8.4% | ||||||||
$1,000 | Albany Indl. Dev. Agy. Rev., Brighter Choice Charter Sch., |
|||||||
5.00%, 4/1/32, Ser. A |
$858,950 | |||||||
300 | Buffalo and Erie Cnty. Indl. Land. Dev. Rev., Catholic Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.250%, 7/1/35 |
336,717 | |||||||
700 | Long Island Pwr. Auth. Elec. Sys. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 9/1/42, Ser. A |
759,773 | |||||||
1,000 | New York City Mun. Wtr. Fin. Auth. Wtr. & Swr. Sys. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/15/34, Ser. DD |
1,144,170 | |||||||
1,000 | New York City Mun. Wtr. Fin. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.375%, 6/15/43, Ser. EE |
1,163,510 | |||||||
1,000 | New York City Mun. Wtr. Fin. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.50%, 6/15/43, Ser. EE |
1,172,230 | |||||||
1,500 | New York St. Dorm. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
7.25%, 10/1/28, Ser. C |
1,772,145 | |||||||
2,000 | New York St. Dorm. Auth., Personal Inc. Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 03/15/13, Ser. A |
2,346,120 | |||||||
900 | Port Auth. of New York and New Jersey Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/1/33, Ser. 179 |
1,043,775 | |||||||
500 | Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00% 11/15/30, Ser. A |
579,100 | |||||||
400 | Utility Debt Securitization Auth. Restructuring Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/15/31, Ser. TE |
471,816 | |||||||
11,648,306 | ||||||||
Ohio5.4% | ||||||||
750 | Deerfield Twp. Tax Increment Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/25 |
793,365 | |||||||
500 | Ohio St. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 9/1/30, Ser. A |
569,705 | |||||||
2,000 | Ohio St. Hosp. Rev., Univ. Hops. Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
4.00%, 1/15/44, Ser. A |
1,993,200 | |||||||
1,040 | Ohio St. Tpk. Comm. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/15/31, Ser. A |
1,171,737 | |||||||
2,445 | Ohio St. Wtr. Dev. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.50%, 6/1/20, Ser. B, AGM |
2,913,560 | |||||||
7,441,567 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
8
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Principal Amount (000) |
Description (a) |
Value (Note 2) |
||||||
Oregon0.5% | ||||||||
$570 | Port of Portland, Portland Intl. Arpt. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/32, Ser. 22 |
$642,059 | |||||||
Pennsylvania5.4% | ||||||||
170 | Butler Cnty. Hosp. Auth. Rev., Butler Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/35, Ser. A |
186,082 | |||||||
2,000 | Delaware River Port Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/34 |
2,258,460 | |||||||
480 | East Stroudsburg Area Sch. Dist., |
|||||||
7.750%, 9/1/27, Ser. A, |
542,563 | |||||||
495 | East Stroudsburg Area Sch. Dist., |
|||||||
7.750%, 9/1/27, |
559,652 | |||||||
25 | East Stroudsburg Area Sch. Dist., |
|||||||
7.750%, 9/1/27, NRE |
28,265 | |||||||
500 | Pennsylvania St. Higher Ed. Facs. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/15/28, Ser. AL |
568,845 | |||||||
1,020 | Pennsylvania St. Tpk. Comm. Oil Franchise Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/23, Ser. A-2, AGT |
1,154,038 | |||||||
2,000 | Philadelphia Wtr. & Wastewater Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/41, Ser. A |
2,230,360 | |||||||
7,528,265 | ||||||||
Rhode Island3.7% | ||||||||
1,070 | Rhode Island Clean Wtr. Fin. Agy. Wtr. Poll. Control Rev., Green Bonds, |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/01/32, Ser. A |
1,243,629 | |||||||
2,000 | Rhode Island Hlth. & Edl. Bldg. Corp. Higher Ed. Facs. Rev., Brown University, |
|||||||
5.00%, 9/1/37 |
2,138,320 | |||||||
1,600 | Rhode Island Hlth. & Edl. Bldg. Corp. Higher Ed. Facs. Rev., Providence College, |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/1/41 |
1,764,432 | |||||||
5,146,381 | ||||||||
South Carolina1.9% | ||||||||
2,000 | Charleston Cnty. Spl. Source Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/32 |
2,286,800 | |||||||
290 | Scago Edl. Facs. Corp. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 12/1/24 |
348,029 | |||||||
2,634,829 | ||||||||
Tennessee2.3% | ||||||||
$250 | Chattanooga-Hamilton Cnty. Hosp. Auth. Rev., Erlanger Hlth. Sys., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/34, Ser. A |
$269,370 | |||||||
1,500 | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp. Rev., |
|||||||
5.25%, 9/1/20, Ser. A |
1,720,635 | |||||||
1,000 | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp. Rev., |
|||||||
5.25%, 9/1/21, Ser. A |
1,169,740 | |||||||
3,159,745 | ||||||||
Texas10.3% | ||||||||
1,000 | Alliance Airport Auth. Inc. Rev., |
|||||||
4.85%, 4/1/21 |
1,011,960 | |||||||
1,000 | Dallas Area Rapid Transit Rev., |
|||||||
5.25%, 12/1/48 |
1,104,710 | |||||||
815 | Everman Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/15/36, PSF |
870,591 | |||||||
185 | Everman Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/15/36, PSF Prerefunded 8/15/2017 @ $100 (b) |
199,545 | |||||||
500 | Houston Arpt. Sys. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/32, Ser. A |
547,045 | |||||||
1,000 | Houston Hotel Occupancy Tax & Spl. Rev., |
|||||||
5.25%, 9/1/29, Ser. A |
1,125,870 | |||||||
1,410 | Houston Util. Sys. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 11/15/32, Ser. B |
1,624,292 | |||||||
1,060 | Klein Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 8/1/38, Ser. A, PSF |
1,158,887 | |||||||
1,200 | North Texas Twy. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.75%, 1/1/40, Ser. A, BHAC |
1,313,028 | |||||||
1,000 | North Texas Twy. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 1/1/31, Ser. A |
1,132,670 | |||||||
1,975 | Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.50%, 2/1/33, |
2,098,220 | |||||||
1,000 | Spring Branch Indep. Sch. Dist. Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.25%, 2/1/38, PSF |
1,060,180 | |||||||
1,000 | Upper Trinity Reg. Wtr. Dist. Treated Wtr. Supply Sys. Rev. Ref. and Impvmt. Bonds, |
|||||||
4.00%, 8/1/37, Ser. A, AGM |
1,011,290 | |||||||
14,258,288 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
9
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Principal Amount (000) |
Description (a) |
Value (Note 2) |
||||||
Utah3.2% | ||||||||
$1,000 | Utah Trans. Auth. Sales Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/15/32, Ser. A, AGM Prerefunded 6/15/18 @ $100 (b) |
$1,108,840 | |||||||
1,000 | Utah Trans. Auth. Sales Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/15/36, Ser. A, AGM Prerefunded 6/15/18 @ $100 (b) |
1,108,840 | |||||||
2,000 | Utah Trans. Auth. Sub. Sales Tax Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 6/15/37, Ser. A |
2,248,500 | |||||||
4,466,180 | ||||||||
Vermont1.6% | ||||||||
2,000 | Univ. of Vermont & St. Agric. College Gen. Oblig., |
|||||||
5.00%, 10/1/38, Ser. A |
2,219,200 | |||||||
Virginia2.8% | ||||||||
1,250 | Riverside Regl. Jail Auth. Fac. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/26 |
1,515,738 | |||||||
2,000 | Virginia College Bldg. Auth. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 2/1/23, Ser. E-1 |
2,420,240 | |||||||
3,935,978 | ||||||||
West Virginia0.2% | ||||||||
300 | Monongalia Cnty. Bldg. Comm. Rev., |
|||||||
5.00%, 7/1/30 |
339,525 | |||||||
Wisconsin1.7% | ||||||||
2,000 | Wisconsin St. Gen. Rev., |
|||||||
6.00%, 5/1/33, Ser. A |
2,314,200 | |||||||
Wyoming2% | ||||||||
2,580 | Wyoming St. Farm Loan Brd. Cap. Facs. Rev., |
|||||||
5.75%, 10/1/20 |
2,824,971 | |||||||
Total Long-Term Investments |
$198,195,940 | |||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS142.6% |
| |||||||
(Cost $185,012,203) |
$198,195,940 | |||||||
Other assets less liabilities(43.1)% |
(59,214,690 | ) | ||||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK100.0% |
$138,981,250 | |||||||
(a) | The following abbreviations are used in portfolio descriptions to indicate an obligation of credit support, in whole or in part: |
AMBACAmbac Assurance Corporation
AGMAssured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AGTAssured Guaranty Corp.
BHACBerkshire Hathaway Assurance Corporation
FGICFinancial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHAFederal Housing Authority
NRE National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation
PSFTexas Permanent School Fund
RADRadian Asset Assurance Inc.
(b) | Prerefunded and escrowed to maturity issues are secured by escrowed cash, U.S. government obligations, or other securities. |
The percentage shown for each investment category is the total value of that category as a percentage of the net assets applicable to common stock of the Fund.
The Fund's investments are carried at fair value which is defined as the price that the Fund would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs established to classify fair value measurements for disclosure purposes is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.).
Level 3significant unobservable inputs (including the Funds own assumptions in determining fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in these securities. For more information about the Fund's policy regarding the valuation of investments and other significant accounting policies, please refer to the Fund's most recent financial statements contained in its semi-annual report. The following is a summary of the inputs used to value each of the Fund's investments at October 31, 2015:
Level 2 |
||||
Municipal bonds |
$198,195,940 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
10
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
There were no Level 1 or Level 3 priced securities held at October 31, 2015.
Summary of State Diversification as a Percentage of Net Assets
Applicable to Common Shareholders
At October 31, 2015
State |
% |
|||
California |
18.1 | |||
Florida |
14.6 | |||
Texas |
10.3 | |||
Illinois |
12.2 | |||
Pennsylvania |
5.4 | |||
New York |
8.4 | |||
Massachusetts |
7.4 | |||
Arizona |
6.3 | |||
Louisiana |
5.4 | |||
Ohio |
5.4 | |||
Georgia |
5.3 | |||
Maryland |
3.8 | |||
Connecticut |
3.3 | |||
Utah |
3.2 | |||
Nebraska |
3.0 | |||
Nevada |
1.6 | |||
Rhode Island |
3.7 | |||
Virginia |
2.8 | |||
Indiana |
2.7 | |||
New Jersey |
2.6 | |||
Wyoming |
2.0 | |||
Tennessee |
2.3 | |||
Maine |
2.1 | |||
South Carolina |
1.9 | |||
Wisconsin |
1.7 | |||
District of Columbia |
1.6 | |||
Vermont |
1.6 | |||
Michigan |
1.4 | |||
West Virginia |
0.2 | |||
Colorado |
0.8 | |||
Idaho |
0.8 | |||
Oregon |
0.5 | |||
Alaska |
0.2 | |||
142.6 | ||||
Other liabilities in excess of assets |
(42.6 | ) | ||
100.0 | ||||
Summary of Ratings as a Percentage of Long-Term Investments
(Unaudited)
At October 31, 2015
Rating * |
% |
|||
AAA |
7.3 | |||
AA |
46.9 | |||
A |
36.4 | |||
BBB |
6.4 | |||
BB |
0.0 | |||
B |
1.4 | |||
NR |
1.6 | |||
100.0 | ||||
* | Individual ratings are grouped based on the lower rating of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC ("S&P") or Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") and are expressed using the S&P ratings scale. If a particular security is rated by either S&P or Moody's, but not both, then the single rating is used. If a particular security is not rated by either S&P or Moody's, then a rating from Fitch Ratings, Inc. is used, if available. The Fund does not evaluate these ratings but simply assigns them to the appropriate credit quality category as determined by the ratings agencies, as applicable. Securities that have not been rated by S&P, Moody's or Fitch totaled 1.6% of the portfolio at the end of the reporting period. |
Portfolio Composition
(as a percentage of total investments)
At October 31, 2015
% |
||||
Transportation |
13.7 | |||
Healthcare |
13.6 | |||
Water & Sewer |
11.6 | |||
General Obligation |
10.8 | |||
Special Tax |
10.5 | |||
Pre-refunded |
10.1 | |||
Education |
9.7 | |||
Misc. Revenue |
7.4 | |||
Electric & Gas |
5.2 | |||
Airports |
3.6 | |||
Tobacco |
2.0 | |||
Cash |
1.5 | |||
Housing |
0.3 | |||
100.0 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
11
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
October 31, 2015
ASSETS: |
||||
Investments, at value (cost $185,012,203) |
$198,195,940 | |||
Cash |
3,041,372 | |||
Interest receivable |
2,729,959 | |||
Prepaid expenses |
17,020 | |||
Total assets |
203,984,291 | |||
LIABILITIES: |
||||
Investment advisory fee (Note 3) |
86,571 | |||
Administrative fee (Note 3) |
16,511 | |||
Interest payable on Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (Note 7) |
78,375 | |||
Accrued expenses |
63,043 | |||
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (650 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference $100,000 per share net of deferred offering cost of $241,459) (Note 7) |
64,758,541 | |||
Total liabilities |
65,003,041 | |||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
$138,981,250 | |||
CAPITAL: |
||||
Common stock ($0.01 par value per share; 599,999,350 shares authorized, 8,519,010 issued and outstanding) |
$85,190 | |||
Additional paid-in capital |
120,451,204 | |||
Undistributed net investment income |
4,857,036 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments |
404,083 | |||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments |
13,183,737 | |||
Net assets applicable to common stock |
$138,981,250 | |||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK |
$16.31 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
12
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the year ended October 31, 2015
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
||||
Interest |
$8,519,310 | |||
EXPENSES: |
||||
Investment advisory fees (Note 3) |
1,025,670 | |||
Interest expense and amortization of deferred offering costs on preferred shares (Note 7) |
1,021,271 | |||
Administrative fees (Note 3) |
196,188 | |||
Directors fees |
98,399 | |||
Professional fees |
83,540 | |||
Custodian fees |
56,347 | |||
Reports to shareholders |
37,500 | |||
Transfer agent fees |
27,735 | |||
Registration fees |
23,751 | |||
Other expenses |
36,037 | |||
Total expenses |
2,606,438 | |||
Net investment income |
5,912,872 | |||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS): | ||||
Net realized gain on investments |
679,577 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
(2,680,669 | ) | ||
Net realized and unrealized loss |
(2,001,092 | ) | ||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$3,911,780 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
13
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For the year ended October 31, 2015 |
For the year ended October 31, 2014 |
|||||||
OPERATIONS: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
$5,912,872 | $6,233,028 | ||||||
Net realized gain |
679,577 | 330,223 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(2,680,669 | ) | 8,798,600 | |||||
Net increase in net assets applicable to common stock resulting from operations |
3,911,780 | 15,361,851 | ||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
||||||||
Net investment income |
(7,155,967 | ) | (7,243,629 | ) | ||||
Decrease in net assets from distributions to common stockholders (Note 5) |
(7,155,967 | ) | (7,243,629 | ) | ||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
(3,244,187 | ) | 8,118,222 | |||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK: |
||||||||
Beginning of year |
142,225,437 | 134,107,215 | ||||||
End of year (including undistributed net investment income of $4,857,036 and $6,025,583, respectively) |
$138,981,250 | $142,225,437 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
14
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended October 31, 2015
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Interest received |
$9,703,805 | |||||||
Expenses paid |
(1,602,304 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense paid |
(936,409 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities |
(34,505,422 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities |
33,245,240 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$5,904,910 | |||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: |
||||||||
Distributions paid |
(7,155,967 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(7,155,967 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease in cash |
(1,251,057 | ) | ||||||
Cashbeginning of year |
4,292,429 | |||||||
Cashend of year |
$3,041,372 | |||||||
Reconciliation of net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
$3,911,780 | |||||||
Purchase of investment securities |
(34,505,422 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment securities |
33,245,240 | |||||||
Net amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on debt securities |
1,058,915 | |||||||
Amortization of deferred offering costs |
85,983 | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments |
(679,577 | ) | ||||||
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
2,680,669 | |||||||
Decrease in interest receivable |
125,580 | |||||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable on Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares |
(1,121 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in accrued expenses |
(17,137 | ) | ||||||
Total adjustments |
1,993,130 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$5,904,910 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
15
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTSSELECTED PER SHARE DATA AND RATIOS
The table below provides information about income and capital changes for a share of common stock outstanding throughout the years indicated (excluding supplemental data provided below):
For the year ended October 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
PER SHARE DATA: | 2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
$16.70 | $15.74 | $17.39 | $16.23 | $16.47 | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
0.69 | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.92 | |||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(0.24 | ) | 1.08 | (1.64 | ) | 1.16 | (0.25 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions on remarketed preferred stock from net investment income (1) |
| 0.00 | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions on remarketed preferred stock from net realized gains (1) |
| | | | (2) | | (2) | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations applicable to common stock |
0.45 | 1.81 | (0.81 | ) | 2.05 | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||
Distributions on common stock: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
(0.84 | ) | (0.85 | ) | (0.84 | ) | (0.84 | ) | (0.80 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gains |
| | | (0.05 | ) | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total distributions |
(0.84 | ) | (0.85 | ) | (0.84 | ) | (0.89 | ) | (0.90 | ) | ||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
$16.31 | $16.70 | $15.74 | $17.39 | $16.23 | |||||||||||||||
Per share market value, end of year |
$15.13 | $15.15 | $14.16 | $17.99 | $15.54 | |||||||||||||||
RATIOS TO AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
1.86 | % | 1.89 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.23 | % | ||||||||||
Operating expenses, without leverage |
1.11 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.14 | % | ||||||||||
Net investment income |
4.21 | % | 4.51 | % | 5.03 | % | 5.35 | % | 5.90 | % | ||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total return on market value (3) |
5.55 | % | 13.19 | % | (16.98 | )% | 22.08 | % | 2.73 | % | ||||||||||
Total return on net asset value (3) |
2.77 | % | 11.79 | % | (4.75 | )% | 12.95 | % | 4.36 | % | ||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
16 | % | 9 | % | 15 | % | 11 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Asset coverage ratio on preferred stock, end of year |
314 | % | 319 | % | 306 | % | 328 | % | 312 | % | ||||||||||
Net assets applicable to common stock, end of year (000s omitted) |
$138,981 | $142,225 | $134,107 | $148,127 | $138,105 |
(1) | The remarketed preferred stock was fully redeemed in 2013. |
(2) | Amount per share is less than $0.01. |
(3) | Total return on market value assumes a purchase of common stock at the opening market price on the first business day and a sale at the closing market price on the last business day of each year shown in the table and assumes reinvestment of dividends at the actual reinvestment prices obtained under the terms of the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total return on net asset value uses the same methodology, but with use of net asset value for beginning, ending and reinvestment values. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
16
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31, 2015
Note 1. Organization
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (the Fund) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on September 24, 1991 as a diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Funds investment objective is current income exempt from regular federal income tax consistent with preservation of capital.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following are the significant accounting policies of the Fund.
A. Investment Valuation: Debt securities are generally valued based on the evaluated bid using process provided by one or more dealers regularly making a market in that security, an independent pricing service, or quotes from broker-dealers, when such prices are believed to reflect the fair value of such securities and are generally classified as Level 2. The relative liquidity of some securities in the Funds portfolio may adversely affect the ability of the Fund to accurately value such securities. Any securities for which it is determined that market prices are unavailable or inappropriate are valued at fair value using a procedure determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and are classified as Level 2 or 3 based on the valuation inputs.
B. Investment Transactions and Investment Income: Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. The Fund amortizes premiums and accretes discounts on securities using the effective interest method.
C. Federal Income Taxes: It is the Funds intention to comply with requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable income and capital gains to its shareholders. Therefore, no provision for federal income or excise taxes is required. Management of the Fund has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Since tax authorities can examine previously filed tax returns, the Funds tax returns filed for the tax years 2012 to 2015 are subject to such review.
D. Dividends and Distributions: The Fund declares and pays dividends on its common stock monthly from net investment income. Net long-term capital gains, if any, in excess of loss carryforwards are expected to be distributed annually. Dividends and distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends on the Funds Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (VMTP Shares) are accrued on a daily basis and paid on a monthly basis and are determined as described in Note 8.
The amount and timing of distributions are generally determined in accordance with federal tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
E. Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F. Accounting Standards: The Fund adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.
17
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Note 3. Agreements and Management Arrangements
A. Adviser: The Fund has an Advisory Agreement with Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. (the Adviser), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (Virtus). The investment advisory fee is payable monthly at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Funds average weekly managed assets, which is defined as the aver- age weekly value of the total assets of the Fund minus the sum of all accrued liabilities of the Fund (other than the aggregate amount of any outstanding borrowings or other indebtedness constituting financial leverage).
B. Administrator: The Fund has an Administration Agreement with J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC (Hilliard). The administration fee is payable quarterly at an annual rate of 0.14% of the Funds average weekly net assets, which is defined as the average weekly value of the total assets of the Fund minus the sum of all accrued liabilities of the Fund (including aggregate amount of any outstanding borrowings or other indebtedness constituting financial leverage).
C. Directors: The Fund pays each director not affiliated with the Adviser an annual fee plus a fee for certain meetings of the board or committees of the board attended. Total fees paid to directors for the twelve months ended October 31, 2015 were $98,399.
D. Affiliated Shareholder: At October 31, 2015, Virtus Partners, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Virtus) held 30,643 shares of the Fund which represent 0.36% of shares of common stock outstanding. These shares may be sold at any time.
Note 4. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the year ended October 31, 2015 were $31,761,484 and $33,245,240, respectively.
Note 5. Distributions and Tax Information
At October 31, 2015, the federal tax cost and aggregate gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) were as follows:
Federal Tax |
Unrealized Appreciation |
Unrealized Depreciation |
Net Unrealized Appreciation |
|||||||||
$184,958,600 | $ | 13,590,273 | $ | (352,933 | ) | $ | 13,237,340 |
The difference between the book-basis and tax-basis of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is primarily attributable to the difference between book and tax amortization methods for premiums and discounts on fixed income securities.
The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||
Distributions paid from: |
||||||||
Tax-exempt income |
$ | 8,092,377 | $ | 8,101,607 | ||||
Ordinary income |
| 91,284 | ||||||
Long-term capital gains |
| | ||||||
Total distributions |
$ | 8,092,377 | $ | 8,192,891 | ||||
18
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
At October 31, 2015, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed net tax-exempt income |
$4,881,808 | |||
Undistributed net ordinary income |
| |||
Other accumulated gain |
404,083 | |||
Other ordinary timing differences |
(78,375 | ) | ||
Unrealized net appreciation (depreciation) |
13,237,340 | |||
$18,444,856 | ||||
Note 6. Reclassification of Capital Accounts
Due to inherent differences in the recognition and distribution of income and realized gains (losses) under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and for federal income tax purposes, permanent differences between book and tax basis reporting have been identified and appropriately reclassified on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. At October 31, 2015, the following reclassifications were recorded:
Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated net realized |
Undistributed net investment income |
||||
$(85,983) | $11,435 | $74,548 |
The reclassifications are attributable to expenses related to the VMTP Shares offering and deminimis market discount. These reclassifications have no impact on the net asset value of the fund.
Note 7. Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
On August 22, 2013, the Fund issued 650 shares of VMTP Shares with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. Proceeds from the issuance of VMTP Shares were used to redeem all of the Funds outstanding RP shares. VMTP Shares are a floating-rate form of preferred shares with a mandatory redemption date. The Fund is required to redeem all outstanding VMTP Shares on August 21, 2018, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. VMTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends and a redemption premium, if any.
Key terms of the series of VMTP Shares at October 31, 2015 are as follows:
Series |
Shares Outstanding |
Liquidation Preference |
Quarterly Rate Reset | Rate |
Mandatory Redemption Date |
|||||||||||||||
2018 | 650 | $65,000,000 | SIFMA Municipal Swap Index + 1.40% | 1.41% | 8/21/2018 |
The Fund incurred costs in connection with the issuance of the VMTP Shares. These costs were recorded as a deferred charge and are being amortized over the 5 year life of the VMTP Shares. Amortization of these deferred offering costs of $85,983 is included under the caption Interest expense and amortization of deferred offering cost on preferred shares on the Statement of Operations and the unamortized balance is deducted from the carrying amount of the VMTP shares under the caption Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Dividends paid on the VMTP Shares (which are treated as interest expense for financial reporting purposes) are accrued daily and paid monthly. The dividend rate for each weekly period will be the sum of the Applicable Spread of 1.40% per annum (subject to adjustment in the event of a ratings downgrade of the VMTP Shares) plus the Securities
19
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
October 31, 2015
Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index (the SIFMA Index). The average liquidation value outstanding and the average annualized dividend rate of the VMTP Shares during the year ended October 31, 2015, were $65,000,000 and 1.44%, respectively.
The Fund is subject to certain restrictions relating to the VMTP Shares, such as maintaining certain asset coverage, effective leverage ratio and overcollateralization ratio requirements. Failure to comply with these restrictions could preclude the Fund from declaring any distributions to common shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could trigger the mandatory redemption of the VMTP Shares at liquidation value.
For financial reporting purposes, the liquidation value of the VMTP Shares, which are considered debt of the Fund, is recorded as a liability under the caption Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends on VMTP Shares are shown under the caption Accrued interest payable on Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of Interest expense and amortization of deferred offering cost on preferred shares on the Statement of Operations.
Note 8. Indemnifications
Under the Funds organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not occurred. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these arrangements and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Note 9. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated the impact all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that, other than those described above, there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
20
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Directors of
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (the Fund), including the schedule of investments, as of October 31, 2015, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Funds internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2015, by correspondence with the custodian. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. at October 31, 2015, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois
December 18, 2015
21
TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Fund did not pay ordinary income or long-term capital gains dividends during the taxable year ended October 31, 2015. All of the other net investment income distributions paid by the Fund qualify and are designated as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.
INFORMATION ABOUT PROXY VOTING BY THE FUND (Unaudited)
Although the Fund does not typically hold voting securities, a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Administrator toll-free at (888) 878-7845 or is available on the Funds website www.dtffund.com or on the SECs website www.sec.gov.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS (Unaudited)
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third fiscal quarters of each fiscal year (quarters ended January 31 and July 31) on Form N-Q. The Funds Form N-Q is available on the SECs web site at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) 732-0330. In addition, the Funds Form N-Q is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Administrator toll-free at (888) 878-7845 or is available on the Funds website at www.dtffund.com.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Since October 31, 2014: (i) there have been no material changes in the Funds investment objectives or policies that have not been approved by the shareholders; (ii) there have been no changes in the Funds charter or by-laws that would delay or prevent a change in control of the Fund which have not been approved by the shareholders; (iii) there have been no material changes in the principal risk factors associated with an investment in the Fund; and (iv) there have been no changes in the persons who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds portfolio.
Additional information, if any, relating to the Funds directors and officers, in addition to such information as is found elsewhere in the Annual Report, may be requested by contacting the Fund at the address provided in this report.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the 1940 Act that the Fund may from time to time purchase its shares of common stock in the open market.
22
INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
Set forth below are the names and certain biographical information about the directors of the Fund. Directors are divided into three classes and are elected to serve staggered three-year terms. All of the directors are elected by the holders of the Funds common stock, except for Mr. Pollard who is elected by the holders of the Funds preferred stock. All of the current directors of the Fund, with the exception of Mr. Partain, are classified as independent directors because none of them are interested persons of the Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act. Mr. Partain is an interested person of the Fund by reason of his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and President, Chief Investment Officer and employee of the Adviser. The term Fund Complex refers to the Fund and all the other investment companies advised by affiliates of Virtus.
The address for all directors is c/o Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. All of the Funds directors currently serve on the Board of Directors of three other registered closed-end investment companies that are advised by Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co.: DNP Select Income Fund Inc. (DNP), Duff & Phelps Global Utility Income Fund Inc. (DPG) and Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (DUC).
DIRECTORS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
Independent Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Age | Position(s) Held with Fund |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other Directorships Held by the Director During Past 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||
Donald C. Burke Age: 55 |
Director | Term expires 2018; Director since 2014 | Retired since 2009; Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc. 2006-2009; President and Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock U.S. Funds 2007-2009; Managing Director, Merrill Lynch Investment Managers 1990-2006 | 4 | Director, Avista Corp. (energy company); Trustee, Goldman Sachs Fund Complex 2010-2014; BlackRock Luxembourg and Cayman Funds 2006-2010 | |||||||||||||||||
Stewart E. Conner Age: 74 |
Director | Term expires 2015; Director since 2009 | Retired since 2005; Attorney, Wyatt Tarrant & Combs LLP 1966-2005 (Chairman, Executive Committee 2000-2004; Managing Partner 1988-2000) | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Genetski Age: 73 |
Director | Term expires 2016; Director since 2009 | Co-owner, Good Industries, Inc. (branding company) since 2014; President, Robert Genetski & Associates, Inc. (economic and financial consulting firm) since 1991; Senior Managing Director, Chicago Capital Inc. (financial services firm) 1995-2001; former Senior Vice President and Chief Economist, Harris Trust & Savings Bank; author of several books | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Philip R. McLoughlin Age: 69 |
Director | Term expires 2016; Director since 1996 | Private investor since 2010; Partner, CrossPond Partners, LLC (investment management consultant) 2006-2010; Managing Director, SeaCap Partners LLC (strategic advisory firm) 2009-2010 | 66 | Chairman of the Board, The World Trust Fund (closed-end fund) since 2010 (Director since 1991) |
23
Name and Age | Position(s) Held with Fund |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other Directorships Held by the Director During Past 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||
Geraldine M. McNamara Age: 64 | Director | Term expires 2017; Director since 2003 | Private investor since 2006; Managing Director, U.S. Trust Company of New York 1982-2006 | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Eileen A. Moran Age: 61 |
Director | Term expires 2018: Director since 1996 | Private investor since 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer, PSEG Resources L.L.C. (investment company) 1990-2011 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Christian H. Poindexter Age: 77 |
Director | Term expires 2017; Director since 2008 | Retired since 2003; Executive Committee Chairman, Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (public utility holding company) 2002-2003 (Chairman of the Board 1999-2002; Chief Executive Officer 1999-2001; President 1999-2000); Chairman, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company 1993-2002 (Chief Executive Officer 1993-2000; President 1998-2000; Director 1988-2003) | 4 | Director, The Baltimore Life Insurance Company 1998-2011 | |||||||||||||||||
Carl F. Pollard Age: 77 |
Director | Term expires 2017; Director since 2006 | Owner, CFP Thoroughbreds LLC (f/k/a Hermitage Farm LLC) since 1995; Chairman, Columbia Healthcare Corporation 1993-1994; Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Galen Health Care, Inc. March-August 1993; President and Chief Operating Officer, Humana Inc. 1991-1993 (previously Senior Executive Vice President, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) | 4 | Director, Churchill Downs Incorporated 1985-2011 (Chairman of the Board 2001-2011) | |||||||||||||||||
David J. Vitale Age: 69 |
Director and Chairman of the Board | Term expires 2018; Director since 2005 | Chairman of the Board of the Fund, DNP and DUC since 2009 and DPG since 2011; Chairman, Urban Partnership Bank since 2010; President, Chicago Board of Education 2011-2015; Senior Advisor to the CEO, Chicago Public Schools 2007-2008 (Chief Administrative Officer 2003-2007); President and Chief Executive Officer, Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. 2001-2002; Vice Chairman and Director, Bank One Corporation 1998-1999; Vice Chairman and Director, First Chicago NBD Corporation, and President, The First National Bank of Chicago 1995-1998; Vice Chairman, First Chicago Corporation and The First National Bank of Chicago 1993-1998 (Director 1992-1998; Executive Vice President 1986-1993) | 4 | Director, United Continental Holdings, Inc. (airline holding company; f/k/a UAL Corporation), Urban Partnership Bank, Ariel Capital Management, LLC and Wheels, Inc. (automobile fleet management) |
24
Interested Director | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Age | Position(s) Held with Fund |
Term of Office and Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other Directorships Held by the Director During Past 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||
Nathan I. Partain, CFA Age: 59 |
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | Term expires 2016; Director since 2007 | President and Chief Investment Officer of the Adviser since 2005 (Executive Vice President 1997-2005); Director of Utility Research, Duff & Phelps Investment Research Co. 1989-1996 (Director of Equity Research 1993-1996 and Director of Fixed Income Research 1993); President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and DUC since 2004 and of DPG since 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer of DNP since 2001 (Chief Investment Officer since 1998; Executive Vice President 1998-2001; Senior Vice President 1997-1998) | 4 | Chairman of the Board and Director, Otter Tail Corporation (manages diversified operations in the electric, plastics, manufacturing and other business operations sectors) |
25
OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
The officers of the Fund are elected at the annual meeting of the board of directors of the Fund and serve until their respective successors are chosen and qualified. The Funds officers receive no compensation from the Fund, but are also officers of the Adviser or Virtus and receive compensation in such capacities. Information pertaining to Nathan I. Partain, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, is provided above under the caption Interested Director. Information pertaining to the other officers of the Fund is set forth below.
Name, Address and Age |
Position(s) Held with Fund and |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | ||
Timothy M. Heaney, CFA Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 100 Pearl Street Hartford, CT 06103 Age: 50 |
Chief Investment Officer since 2004 (Vice President since 1997; Portfolio Manager 1997-2004) | Senior Managing Director of the Adviser since 2014 (Senior Vice President 2004-2014; Vice President 1997-2004); Senior Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income, Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011; Senior Managing Director, Fixed Income, Virtus Investment Advisors, Inc. (and predecessor firms) 2006-2011 (Managing Director, Fixed Income 1997-2006; Director, Fixed Income Research 1996-1997; Investment Analyst 1992-1996) | ||
Lisa H. Leonard Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 100 Pearl Street Hartford, CT 06103 Age: 52 |
Vice President since 2006 | Managing Director of the Adviser since 2014 (Vice President 2006-2014; Assistant Vice President 1998-2006); Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income, Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011; Managing Director, Fixed Income, Virtus Investment Advisors, Inc. (and predecessor firms) 2006-2011 (Director, Fixed Income 1998-2006, Director, Investment Operations 1994-1998, Fixed Income Trader 1987-1994) | ||
Alan M. Meder Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60606 Age: 56 |
Treasurer since 2000 and Principal Financial and Accounting Officers and Assistant Secretary since 2002 | Chief Risk Officer of the Adviser since 2001 and Senior Managing Director since 2014 (Senior Vice President 1994-2014); Board of Governors of CFA Institute 2008-2014 (Chair of the Board of Governors of CFA Institute 2012-2013; Vice Chairman of the Board 2011-2012); Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council Member 2011-2014 | ||
Daniel J. Petrisko, CFA Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60606 Age: 55 |
Assistant Secretary since October 2015 | Senior Managing Director of the Adviser since 2014 (Senior Vice President 1997-2014; Vice President 1995-1997) | ||
William J. Renahan Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. 100 Pearl Street Hartford, CT 06103 Age: 46 |
Vice President and Secretary since October 2015 | Secretary of the Adviser since 2014 and General Counsel since 2015: Senior Legal Counsel and Vice President, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. since 2012; Managing Director, Legg Mason, Inc. (and predecessor firms) 1999-2012 | ||
Joyce B. Riegel Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60606 Age: 61 |
Chief Compliance Officer since 2003 | Chief Compliance Officer of the Adviser since 2002 and Senior Managing Director since 2014 (Senior Vice President 2004-2014; Vice President 2002-2004) | ||
Dianna P. Wengler J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC 500 West Jefferson Street Louisville, KY 40202 Age: 55 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary since 2014 | Vice President, J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC since 1990; Senior Vice President, Hilliard-Lyons Government Fund, Inc. 2006-2010 (Vice President 1998-2006; Treasurer 1988-2010) |
26
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND CASH PURCHASE PLAN (Unaudited)
Pursuant to the Funds Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the Plan), common shareholders may elect to have all distributions of dividends and capital gains automatically reinvested by American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the Plan Agent) in shares of common stock of the Fund (Fund Shares) pursuant to the Plan; provided that such election is subject to the power of the Board of Directors to declare capital gains distributions in the form of stock (if such a declaration is made by the Board of Directors, all shareholders who do not elect to receive cash will receive the distribution in the form of stock whether or not they elect to participate in the Plan). Common shareholders who do not participate in the Plan will receive all distributions in cash (except as described above) paid by check in United States dollars mailed directly to the shareholder of record (or if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to the nominee) by the Custodian, as dividend disbursing agent. Common shareholders who wish to participate in the Plan should contact the Fund at 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11219 or call toll free (800) 937-5449.
The Plan Agent serves as agent for the common shareholders in administering the Plan. After the Fund declares a dividend or determines to make a capital gain distribution, if (1) the market price is lower than net asset value, the participants in the Plan will receive the equivalent in Fund Shares valued at the market price determined as of the time of purchase (generally, the payment date of the dividend or distribution); or if (2) the market price of Fund Shares on the payment date of the dividend or distribution is equal to or exceeds their net asset value, participants will be issued Fund Shares at the higher of net asset value or 95% of the market price. This discount reflects savings in underwriting and other costs that the Fund otherwise will be required to incur to raise additional capital. If net asset value exceeds the market price of Fund Shares on the payment date or the Fund declares a dividend or other distribution payable only in cash (i.e., if the board of directors precludes reinvestment in Fund Shares for that purpose), the Plan Agent will, as agent for the participants, receive the cash payment and use it to buy Fund Shares in the open market, on the New York Stock Exchange, other national securities exchanges on which the Funds common stock is listed or elsewhere, for the participants accounts. If, before the Plan Agent has completed its purchases, the market price exceeds the net asset value of a Fund Share, the average per share purchase price paid by the Plan Agent may exceed the net asset value of Fund Shares, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the dividend or distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund. The Fund will not issue shares under the Plan below net asset value.
Participants in the Plan may withdraw from the Plan upon written notice to the Plan Agent and will receive certificates for whole Fund Shares and a cash payment will be made for any fraction of a Fund Share.
There is no charge to participants for reinvesting dividends or capital gain distributions, except for certain brokerage commissions, as described below. The Plan Agents fees for the handling of the reinvestment of dividends and distributions will be paid by the Fund. There will be no brokerage commissions charged with respect to shares issued directly by the Fund. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agents open market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of dividends and distributions. The automatic reinvestment of dividends and distributions will not relieve participants of any federal income tax that may be payable on such dividends or distributions.
Experience under the Plan may indicate that changes are desirable. Accordingly, the Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan as applied to any dividend or distribution paid subsequent to written notice of the change sent to all shareholders of the Fund at least 90 days before the record date for the dividend or distribution. The Plan also may be amended or terminated by the Plan Agent upon at least 90 days written notice to all common shareholders of the Fund. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Fund at the address on the front of this report.
The Plan permits Plan participants to periodically purchase additional shares of common stock through the Plan by delivering to the Plan Agent a check for at least $100, but not more than $5,000, in any month. The Plan Agent will use the funds to purchase shares in the open market or in private transactions as described above with respect to reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Purchases made pursuant to this feature of the Plan will be made commencing at the time of the first dividend or distribution payment following the second business day after receipt of the funds for additional purchases, and may be aggregated with purchases of shares for reinvestment of the dividends and distributions.
27
Shares will be allocated to the accounts of participants purchasing additional shares at the average price per share, plus a service charge imposed by the Plan Agent and brokerage commissions (or equivalent purchase costs) paid by the Plan Agent for all shares purchased by it, including for reinvestment of dividends and distributions. Checks drawn on a foreign bank are subject to collection and collection fees, and will be invested at the time of the next distribution after funds are collected by the Plan Agent.
The Plan Agent will make every effort to invest funds promptly, and in no event more than 30 days after the Plan Agent receives a dividend or distribution, except where postponement is deemed necessary to comply with applicable provisions of the federal securities laws.
Funds sent to the Plan Agent for voluntary additional share investment may be recalled by the participant by written notice received by the Plan Agent not later than two business days before the next distribution payment date. If for any reason a regular monthly distribution is not paid by the Fund, funds for voluntary additional share investment will be returned to the participant, unless the participant specifically directs that they continue to be held by the Plan Agent for subsequent investment.
28
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS. |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer (the Code of Ethics). The registrants principal financial officer also performs the functions of principal accounting officer.
The text of the Code of Ethics is posted on the registrants web site at http://www.dtffund.com. In the event that the registrant makes any amendment to or grants any waiver from the provisions of the Code of Ethics, the registrant intends to disclose such amendment or waiver on its web site within five business days.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
The registrants board of directors has determined that two members of its audit committee, Philip R. McLoughlin and Carl F. Pollard, are audit committee financial experts and that each of them is independent for purposes of this Item.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
The following table sets forth the aggregate audit and non-audit fees billed to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrants principal accountant Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm (the Independent Auditor).
Fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 |
Fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 |
|||||||
Audit Fees (1) |
$52,500 | $51,000 | ||||||
Audit-Related Fees (2)(6) |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Tax Fees (3)(6) |
8,050 | 7,850 | ||||||
All Other Fees (4)(6) |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees (5)(6) |
8,050 | 7,850 |
(1) | Audit Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor for the audit of the registrants annual financial statements and for services that are normally provided by the Independent Auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
(2) | Audit-Related Fees are fees billed for assurance and related services by the Independent Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrants financial statements and are not reported under the caption Audit Fees. |
(3) | Tax Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Independent Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. In both years shown in the table, such services consisted of preparation of the registrants annual federal and state income tax returns and excise tax returns. |
(4) | All Other Fees are fees billed for products and services provided by the Independent Auditor, other than the services reported under the captions Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees. |
(5) | Aggregate Non-Audit Fees are non-audit fees billed by the Independent Auditor for services rendered to the registrant, the registrants investment adviser (the Adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing |
services to the registrant (collectively, the Covered Entities). During both years shown in the table, no portion of such fees related to services rendered by the Independent Auditor to the Adviser or any other Covered Entity. |
(6) | No portion of these fees was approved by the registrants audit committee after the beginning of the engagement pursuant to the waiver of the pre-approval requirement for certain de minimis non-audit services described in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and applicable regulations. |
The audit committee of the board of directors of the registrant (the Audit Committee), jointly with the audit committee of the board of directors of DNP Select Income Fund Inc. (DNP), Duff & Phelps Global Utility Income Fund Inc. (DPG) and Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (DUC), has adopted a Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy to govern the provision by the Independent Auditor of the following services: (i) all engagements for audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Independent Auditor to the registrant and (ii) all engagements for non-audit services to be provided by the Independent Auditor to the Adviser or any other Covered Entity, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant. With respect to non-audit services rendered by the Independent Auditor to the Adviser or any other Covered Entity that were not required to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee because they do not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant, the Audit Committee has nonetheless considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the Independent Auditor.
Set forth below is a copy of the Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy (omitting data in the appendices relating to DNP, DPG and DUC).
DNP SELECT INCOME FUND INC. (DNP)
DUFF & PHELPS GLOBAL UTILITY INCOME FUND INC. (DPG)
DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY AND CORPORATE BOND TRUST INC. (DUC)
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC. (DTF)
AUDIT COMMITTEE
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES PRE-APPROVAL POLICY
(adopted on December 18, 2014 and amended June 18, 2015)
I. | Statement of Principles |
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of each of DNP Select Income Fund Inc., Duff & Phelps Global Utility Income Fund Inc., Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. and DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (each a Fund and, collectively, the Funds)(1) is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that they do not impair the auditors independence from the Fund. To implement these provisions of the Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) has issued rules specifying the types of services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client, as well as the Audit Committees administration of the engagement of the independent auditor. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has adopted this Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre- Approval Policy (this Policy), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor may be pre-approved.
The SECs rules establish two different approaches to pre-approving services, which the SEC considers to be equally valid. Proposed services either: may be pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the Audit Committee (general pre- approval); or require the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee (specific pre-approval). The Audit Committee believes that the combination of these two approaches in this Policy will result in an effective and efficient procedure to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor. As set forth in this Policy, unless a type of service has received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent auditor. Any proposed
(1) | This Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy has been adopted by the Audit Committee of each Fund. Solely for the sake of clarity and simplicity, this Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy has been drafted as if there is a single Fund, a single Audit Committee and a single Board. The terms Audit Committee and Board mean the Audit Committee and Board of each Fund, respectively, unless the context otherwise requires. The Audit Committee and the Board of each Fund, however, shall act separately and in the best interests of its respective Fund. |
services exceeding pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent auditor is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, for reasons such as its familiarity with the Funds business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance the Funds ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor should necessarily be determinative.
Under the SECs rules, the Audit Committee must pre-approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the Funds investment adviser and other affiliated entities that provide ongoing services to the Fund if the independent accountants services to those affiliated entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting.
The Audit Committee is also mindful of the relationship between fees for audit and non-audit services in deciding whether to pre- approve any such services and may determine, for each fiscal year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit-related and tax services (including any audit-related or tax service fees for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval) and the total amount of fees for certain permissible non-audit services classified as all other services (including any such services for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval).
The appendices to this Policy describe the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The term of any general pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers a different period and states otherwise. The Audit Committee will annually review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will add to or subtract from the list of general pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the procedures by which the Audit Committee intends to fulfill its responsibilities. It does not delegate the Audit Committees responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management.
The independent auditor has reviewed this Policy and believes that implementation of this Policy will not adversely affect the auditors independence.
II. | Delegation |
As provided in the Act and the SECs rules, the Audit Committee may delegate either type of pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are independent directors. Any member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for
informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In accordance with the foregoing provisions, the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its chairman, since under the Audit Committees charter each member of the Audit Committee, including the chairman, is required to be an independent director.
III. | Audit Services |
The annual audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other procedures required to be performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on the Funds financial statements. These other procedures include information systems and procedural reviews and testing performed in order to understand and place reliance on the systems of internal control, and consultations relating to the audit. The Audit Committee will monitor the audit services engagement as necessary, but no less than on a semiannual basis, and will also approve, if necessary, any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope, Fund structure or other items.
In addition to the annual audit services engagement approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general pre- approval to other audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably can provide. Other audit services may include statutory audits and services associated with SEC registration statements (on Forms N-1A, N-2, N-3, N-4, etc.), periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the audit services in Appendix A. All other audit services not listed in Appendix A must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
IV. | Audit-Related Services |
Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Funds financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor. Because the Audit Committee believes that the provision of audit-related services does not impair the independence of the auditor and is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence, the Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to audit-related services. Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as audit services; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements under Form N-SAR.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the audit-related services in Appendix B. All other audit-related services not listed in Appendix B must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
V. Tax Services
The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide tax services to the Fund such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice without impairing the auditors independence, and the SEC has stated that the independent auditor may provide such services. Hence, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre-approval to those tax services that have historically been provided by the auditor, that the Audit Committee has reviewed and believes would not impair the independence of the auditor, and that are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. The Audit Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent auditor, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with the Funds Administrator or outside counsel to determine that the tax planning and reporting positions are consistent with this Policy.
Pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the tax services in Appendix C. All tax services involving large and complex transactions not listed in Appendix C must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including: tax services proposed to be provided by the independent auditor to any executive officer or director of the Fund, in his or her individual capacity, where such services are paid for by the Fund.
VI. | All Other Services |
The Audit Committee believes, based on the SECs rules prohibiting the independent auditor from providing specific non-audit services, that other types of non-audit services are permitted. Accordingly, the Audit Committee believes it may grant general pre- approval to those permissible non-audit services classified as all other services that it believes are routine and recurring services, would not impair the independence of the auditor and are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has pre-approved the all other services in Appendix D. Permissible all other services not listed in Appendix D must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
A list of the SECs prohibited non-audit services is attached to this Policy as Appendix E. The SECs rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine the precise definitions of these services and the applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.
VII. | Pre-Approval Fee Levels or Budgeted Amounts |
Pre-approval fee levels or budgeted amounts for all services to be provided by the independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee. (Note that
separate amounts may be specified for services to the Fund and for services to other affiliated entities that are subject to pre- approval.) Any proposed services exceeding these levels or amounts will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is mindful of the overall relationship of fees for audit and non-audit services in determining whether to pre-approve any such services. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee may determine the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit, audit-related and tax services for the Fund (including any audit-related or tax services fees for affiliates that are subject to pre- approval), and the total amount of fees for services classified as all other services (including any such services for affiliates that are subject to pre-approval).
VIII. | Procedures |
All requests or applications for services to be provided by the independent auditor that do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Funds Administrator and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. The Administrator will determine whether such services are included within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the independent auditor.
Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by both the independent auditor and the Funds Administrator, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request or application is consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence.
The Audit Committee has designated the Funds Administrator to monitor the performance of all services provided by the independent auditor and to determine whether such services are in compliance with this Policy. The Administrator will report to the Audit Committee on a periodic basis on the results of its monitoring. Both the Administrator and any member of management will immediately report to the Chairman of the Audit Committee any breach of this Policy that comes to their attention.
IX. | Additional Requirements |
The Audit Committee has determined to take additional measures on an annual basis to meet its responsibility to oversee the work of the independent auditor and to assure the auditors independence from the Fund, such as reviewing a formal written statement from the independent auditor delineating all relationships between the independent auditor and the Fund, consistent with applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussing with the independent auditor its methods and procedures for ensuring independence.
Appendix A
Pre-Approved Audit Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2015
Dated: December 18, 2014 and amended June 18, 2015
Service |
Fees(1) | |||||||
DTF | Affiliates(2) | |||||||
1. Services required under generally accepted auditing standards to perform the audit of the annual financial statements of the Fund, including performance of tax qualification tests relating to the Funds regulated investment company status and issuance of an internal control letter for the Funds Form N-SAR |
$ | 52,530 | N/A | |||||
2. Reading of the Funds semi-annual financial statements |
(3 | ) | N/A | |||||
3. Consultations by the Funds management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard setting bodies (Note: Under SEC rules, some consultations may be audit-related services rather than audit services) |
(3 | ) | N/A |
(1) | In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of- pocket expenses incurred by the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services. |
(2) | These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre- approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide ongoing services to the Fund and the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting. |
(3) | Fees for pre-approved services designated with a (3) shall either be included in the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix A or may be separately charged, provided that the aggregate separate charges for all services designated with a (3) in Appendices A and B may not exceed 10% of the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix A. |
Appendix B
Pre-Approved Audit-Related Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2014
Dated: December 18, 2014 and amended June 18, 2015
Service |
Fees(1) | |||||||
DTF | Affiliates(2) | |||||||
1. Issuance of annual agreed-upon procedures letters relating to the Funds preferred stock or commercial paper, if any |
$ | 0 | N/A | |||||
2. Services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC or other documents issued in connection with securities offerings (e.g., comfort letters, consents), and assistance in responding to SEC comment letters |
(3 | ) | N/A | |||||
3. Agreed-upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters |
(3 | ) | N/A | |||||
4. Consultations by the Funds management as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of transactions or events and/or the actual or potential impact of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the SEC, FASB, or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies (Note: Under SEC rules, some consultations may be audit services rather than audit-related services) |
(3 | ) | N/A | |||||
5. General assistance with implementation of the requirements of SEC rules or listing standards promulgated pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
(3 | ) | N/A |
(1) | In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services. |
(2) | These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre- approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide ongoing services to the Fund and the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting. |
(3) | Fees for pre-approved services designated with a (3) shall either be included in the fee approved for item 1 of Appendix A or may be separately charged, provided that the aggregate separate charges for all services designated with a (3) in Appendices A and B may not exceed 10% of the fee approved for item 1 of Appendix A. |
Appendix C
Pre-Approved Tax Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2015
Dated: December 18, 2014 and amended June 18, 2015
Service |
Fees(1) | |||||||
DTF | Affiliates(2) | |||||||
1. Preparation of federal and state tax returns, including excise tax returns, and review of required distributions to avoid excise tax |
$6,200 | N/A | ||||||
2. Preparation of state tax returns |
N/A | N/A | ||||||
3. Consultations with the Funds management as to the tax treatment of transactions or events |
$ | 8,000 - 15,000 | (3)(4) | N/A | ||||
4. Tax advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments |
(5 | ) | N/A |
(1) | In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services. |
(2) | These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre- approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide ongoing services to the Fund and the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting. |
(3) | This fee was pre-approved by the Audit Committee on June 18, 2015, and thereby became part of this Pre-approval Policy. |
(4) | This is a fund complex fee that covers consultations relating not only to the Fund, but also to three other closed-end investment companies advised by the Adviser: DNP Select Income Fund Inc., Duff & Phelps Global Utility Income Fund Inc. and Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. |
(5) | Fees for pre-approved services designated with a (5) shall either be included in the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix C or may be separately charged, provided that the aggregate separate charges for all services designated with a (5) in this Appendix C may not exceed 10% of the fee approved for item 1 of this Appendix C. |
Appendix D
Pre-Approved All Other Services for Fiscal Year Ending in 2015
Dated: December 18, 2014 and amended June 18, 2015
Service |
Fees(1) | |||
DTF | Affiliates(2) | |||
None |
(1) | In addition to the fees shown in the table, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the reimbursement of the reasonable out-of- pocket expenses incurred by the independent accountant in providing the pre-approved services. |
(2) | These affiliates include the Funds investment adviser (excluding sub-advisers) and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. The Funds Audit Committee must pre- approve non-audit services provided not only to the Fund but also to the adviser and such other affiliated entities, where such entities provide ongoing services to the Fund and the independent accountants services to such entities have a direct impact on the Funds operations or financial reporting. |
Appendix E
Prohibited Non-Audit Services
| Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client |
| Financial information systems design and implementation |
| Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports |
| Actuarial services |
| Internal audit outsourcing services |
| Management functions |
| Human resources |
| Broker-dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services |
| Legal services |
| Expert services unrelated to the audit |
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
The registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the Audit Committee are Robert J. Genetski, Philip R. McLoughlin and Carl F. Pollard.
ITEM 6. | INVESTMENTS. |
A schedule of investments is included as part of the report to stockholders filed under Item 1 of this report.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Although the registrant does not typically hold voting securities, the registrants board of directors has adopted the following proxy voting policies and procedures with respect to proxy voting.
DNP SELECT INCOME FUND INC.
DUFF & PHELPS GLOBAL UTILITY INCOME FUND INC.
DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY AND CORPORATE BOND TRUST INC.
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Last Revised June 19, 2014
I. | Definitions. As used in these Policies and Procedures, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed below: |
A. | Adviser refers to Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. |
B. | Advisers Act refers to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. |
C. | corporate governance matters refers to changes involving the corporate ownership or structure of an issuer whose voting securities are within a portfolio holding, including changes in the state of incorporation, changes in capital structure, including increases and decreases of capital and preferred stock issuance, mergers and other corporate restructurings, and anti-takeover provisions such as staggered boards, poison pills, and supermajority voting provisions. |
D. | Delegate refers to the Adviser, any proxy committee to which the Adviser delegates its responsibilities hereunder and any qualified, independent organization engaged by the Adviser to vote proxies on behalf of the Fund. |
E. | executive compensation matters refers to stock option plans and other executive compensation issues. |
F. | Fund refers to DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. |
G. | Investment Company Act refers to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. |
H. | portfolio holding refers to any company or entity whose voting securities are held within the investment portfolio of the Fund as of the date a proxy is solicited. |
I. | proxy contests refer to any meeting of shareholders of an issuer for which there are at least two sets of proxy statements and proxy cards, one solicited by management and the others by a dissident or group of dissidents. |
J. | social issues refers to social, political and environmental issues. |
K. | takeover refers to hostile or friendly efforts to effect radical change in the voting control of the board of directors of a company. |
II. | General policy. It is the intention of the Fund to exercise voting stock ownership rights in portfolio holdings in a manner that is reasonably anticipated to further the best economic interests of shareholders of the Fund. Accordingly, the Fund or its Delegate (s) shall endeavor to analyze and vote all proxies that are considered likely to have financial implications, and, where appropriate, to participate in corporate governance, shareholder proposals, management communications and legal proceedings. The Fund and its Delegate(s) must also identify potential or actual conflicts of interests in voting proxies and address any such conflict of interest in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. |
III. | Factors to consider when voting. |
A. | The Delegate may abstain from voting when it concludes that the effect on shareholders economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant. |
B. | In analyzing anti-takeover measures, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as overall long-term financial performance of the target company relative to its industry competition. Key measures which shall be considered include, without limitation, five-year annual compound growth rates for sales, operating income, net income, and total shareholder returns (share price appreciation plus dividends). Other financial indicators that will be considered include margin analysis, cash flow, and debt levels. |
C. | In analyzing proxy contests for control, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as long-term financial performance of the target company relative to its industry; managements track record; background to the proxy contest; qualifications of director nominees (both slates); evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders; strategic plan of dissident slate and quality of critique against management; as well as the likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be met; and stock ownership positions. |
D. | In analyzing contested elections for director, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as the qualifications of all director nominees. The Delegate shall also consider the independence and attendance record of board and key committee members. A review of the corporate governance profile shall be completed highlighting entrenchment devices that may reduce accountability. |
E. | In analyzing corporate governance matters, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration such factors as tax and economic benefits associated with amending an issuers state of incorporation, dilution or improved accountability associated with changes in capital structure, management proposals to require a supermajority shareholder vote to amend charters and bylaws and bundled or conditioned proxy proposals. |
F. | In analyzing executive compensation matters and management matters, the Delegate shall vote on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration a companys overall pay program and demonstrated pay-for-performance philosophy, and generally disfavoring such problematic pay practices as (i) repricing or replacing of underwater stock options, (ii) excessive perquisites or tax gross- ups and (iii) change-in-control payments that are excessive or are payable based on a single trigger (i.e. without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties). With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of say on pay votes, the Delegate shall vote in favor of the option that received majority support from shareholders in the most recent advisory vote. If no option received majority support and the board implemented an option that is less frequent than that which received a plurality, but not majority, of votes cast, additional factors will be taken into consideration on a case-by- case basis, including the boards rationale for implementing a less recurring say on pay vote, ownership structure, compensation concerns and say on pay support level from the prior year. |
G. | The Delegate shall generally vote against shareholder proposals on social issues, except where the Delegate determines that a different position would be in the clear economic interests of the Fund and its shareholders. |
IV. | Responsibilities of Delegates. |
A. | In the absence of a specific direction to the contrary from the Board of Directors of the Fund, the Adviser will be responsible for voting proxies for all portfolio holdings in accordance with these Policies and Procedures, or for delegating such responsibility as described below. |
B. | The Adviser may delegate the administration of proxy activities hereunder to a proxy committee established from time to time by the Adviser and may engage one or more qualified, independent organizations to vote proxies on behalf of the Fund. The Adviser shall be responsible for the ensuring that any such Delegate is informed of and complies with these Policies and Procedures. |
C. | In voting proxies on behalf of the Fund, each Delegate shall have a duty of care to safeguard the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders and to act in accordance with these Policies and Procedures. |
D. | No Delegate shall accept direction or inappropriate influence from any other client or third party, or from any director, officer or employee of any affiliated company, and shall not cast any vote inconsistent with these Policies and Procedures without obtaining the prior approval of the Board of Directors of the Fund or its duly authorized representative. |
V. | Conflicts of interest |
A. | The Fund and its Delegate(s) seek to avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest in the voting of proxies for portfolio holdings between the interests of Fund shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the Adviser or any affiliated person of the Fund or the Adviser, on the other hand. The Board of Directors may take into account a wide array of factors in determining whether such a conflict exists, whether such conflict is material in nature, and how to properly address or resolve the same. |
B. | While each conflict situation varies based on the particular facts presented and the requirements of governing law, the Board of Directors or its duly authorized representative may take the following actions, among others, or otherwise give weight to the following factors, in addressing material conflicts of interest in voting (or directing Delegates to vote) proxies pertaining to portfolio holdings: (i) vote pursuant to the recommendation of the proposing Delegate; (ii) abstain from voting; or (iii) rely on the recommendations of an established, independent third party with qualifications to vote proxies, such as Institutional Shareholder Services. |
C. | The Adviser shall notify the Board of Directors of the Fund promptly after becoming aware that any actual or potential conflict of interest exists and shall seek the Board of Directors recommendations for protecting the best interests of Funds shareholders. The Adviser shall not waive any conflict of interest or vote any conflicted proxies without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors or its duly authorized representative. |
VI. | Miscellaneous. |
A. | A copy of the current Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures and the voting records for the Fund, reconciling proxies with portfolio holdings and recording proxy voting guideline compliance and justification, shall be kept in an easily accessible place and available for inspection either physically or through electronic posting on an approved website. |
B. | In the event that a determination, authorization or waiver under these Policies and Procedures is requested at a time other than a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Audit Committee shall be the duly authorized representative of the Board of Directors with the authority and responsibility to interpret and apply these Policies and Procedures and shall provide a report of his or her determinations at the next following meeting of the Board of Directors. |
C. | The Adviser shall present a report of any material deviations from these Policies and Procedures at every regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors and shall provide such other reports as the Board of Directors may request from time to time. The Adviser shall provide to the Fund or any shareholder a record of its effectuation of proxy voting pursuant to these Policies and Procedures at such times and in such format or medium as the Fund shall reasonably request. The Adviser shall be solely responsible for complying with its disclosure and reporting requirements under applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitation, Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act as amended. The Adviser shall gather, collate and present information relating to its proxy voting activities and those of each Delegate in such format and medium as the Fund shall determine from time to time in order for the Fund to discharge its disclosure and reporting obligations pursuant to Rule 30b1-4 under the Investment Company Act. |
D. | The Adviser shall pay all costs associated with proxy voting for portfolio holdings pursuant to these Policies and Procedures and assisting the Fund in providing public notice of the manner in which such proxies were voted, except that the Fund shall pay the costs associated with any filings required under the Investment Company Act. |
E. | In performing its duties hereunder, any Delegate or authorized committee may engage the services of a research and/or voting adviser, the cost of which shall be borne by such Delegate. The Adviser may delegate its voting responsibilities hereunder to a Proxy Committee established by the Adviser. |
F. | These Policies and Procedures shall be presented to the Board of Directors annually for their amendment and/or approval. |
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
In this Item 8, the term Fund refers to the registrant, DTF Tax-Free Income Inc.
The Funds Portfolio Managers
A team of investment professionals employed by Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., the Funds investment adviser (the Adviser), is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Funds portfolio. The members of that investment team and their respective roles, as of December 30, 2015, are as follows: Timothy M. Heaney, CFA, has been Chief Investment Officer of the Fund since 2004 and Vice President since 1997 (Portfolio Manager 1997-2004). He has been a Senior Managing Director of the Adviser since 2014 (Senior Vice President from 2004 to 2014 and Vice President 1997-2004). He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager in the Fixed Income unit of Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011 and was Senior Managing Director in the Fixed Income unit of the Advisers affiliate, Virtus Investment Advisers, Inc. (and predecessor firms) (VIA) 2006-2011 (Managing Director 1997-2006, Director, Fixed Income Research 1996-1997, Investment Analyst 1992-1996). Mr. Heaney is the head of the municipal bond product area for the Adviser and Newfleet Asset Management, LLC.
Lisa H. Leonard has been Vice President of the Fund since 2006. She has been managing Director of the Adviser since 2014 (Vice President from 2006 to 2014). She has also been a Portfolio Manager in the Fixed Income unit of Newfleet Asset Management, LLC since 2011 and was Portfolio Manager in the Fixed Income unit of VIA 1998-2011 (Director, Investment Operations 1994-1998, Fixed Income Trader 1987-1993). Ms. Leonard assists Mr. Heaney in the management of the Funds portfolio in her capacity as a portfolio manager in the municipal bond product area for the Adviser and Newfleet Asset Management, LLC.
Other Accounts Managed by the Funds Portfolio Managers
The following table provides information as of October 31, 2015 regarding the other accounts besides the Fund that are managed by the portfolio managers of the Fund. As noted in the table, portfolio managers of the Fund may also manage or be members of management teams for other mutual funds within the same fund complex or other similar accounts. For purposes of this disclosure, the term fund complex includes the Fund and all other investment companies advised by affiliates of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (Virtus), the Advisers ultimate parent company. As of October 31, 2015, the Funds portfolio managers did not manage any accounts with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, nor do they manage any hedge funds.
Registered Investment Companies (1) |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles (2) |
Other Accounts (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of Portfolio Manager |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets (in millions) |
||||||||||||||||||
Timothy M. Heaney |
13 | $9,353 | * | N/A | N/A | 25 | $1,662 | |||||||||||||||||
Lisa H. Leonard |
13 | $9,353 | * | N/A | N/A | 25 | $1,662 |
(1) | Registered Investment Companies include all open and closed-end mutual funds. For Registered Investment Companies, assets represent net assets of all open-end investment companies and gross assets of all closed-end investment companies. |
(2) | Other Pooled Investment Vehicles include, but are not limited to, securities of issuers exempt from registration under Section 3(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, such as private placements and hedge funds. |
(3) | Other Accounts include, but are not limited to, individual managed accounts, separate accounts, institutional accounts, pension funds and collateralized bond obligations. |
* | Mr. Heaney and Ms. Leonard are Portfolio Managers for several open-end and closed-end registered investment companies with $9.353 billion in assets of which $242 million are municipal securities |
There may be certain inherent conflicts of interest that arise in connection with the portfolio managers management of the Funds investments and the investments of any other accounts they manage. Such conflicts could include aggregation of orders for all accounts managed by a particular portfolio manager, the allocation of purchases across all such accounts, the allocation of IPOs and any soft dollar arrangements that the Adviser may have in place that could benefit the Fund and/or such other accounts. The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures designed to address any such conflicts of interest to ensure that all management time, resources and investment opportunities are allocated equitably. There have been no material compliance issues with respect to any of these policies and procedures during the Funds most recent fiscal year. |
Compensation of the Funds Portfolio Managers |
The following is a description of the compensation structure of the Funds portfolio managers. |
The Adviser is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (Virtus). Virtus and its affiliated investment management firms, including the Adviser, believe that their compensation programs are adequate and competitive to attract and retain high caliber investment professionals. The portfolio managers receive a base salary, an incentive bonus opportunity, and a benefits package, as detailed below. Highly-compensated individuals participate in a long-term incentive compensation program, including potential awards of Virtus restricted stock units (RSUs) with multi-year vesting, subject to Virtus board approval, and may also take advantage of opportunities to defer their compensation and potentially defer their current tax liability. |
Base Salary: Each portfolio manager is paid a fixed base salary, which is determined by Virtus and the Adviser and is designed to be competitive in light of the individuals experience and responsibilities. Virtus management utilizes results of investment industry compensation surveys conducted by an independent third party in evaluating competitive market compensation for its investment management professionals. |
Incentive Bonus: Incentive bonus pools are based on firm profits. The short-term incentive payment is generally paid in cash, but a portion may be made in Virtus RSUs. Individual payments are assessed using comparisons of actual investment performance with specific peer group or index measures established at the beginning of each calendar year. Performance of the Fund managed is measured over one-, three- and five-year periods. Generally, an individual managers participation is based on the performance of each fund managed as weighted roughly by total assets in each of these funds. Incentive bonus compensation of the Funds portfolio managers is currently comprised of two main components: |
First, 70% of the incentive is based on: (i) the pre-tax performance of the Fund, as measured by total return over one-, three-, and five- year periods against specified benchmarks and/or peer groups; (ii) the success of the individual manager in achieving assigned goals; and (iii) a subjective assessment of the managers contribution to the efforts of the team. The total return component of the performance portion of portfolio managers incentive bonus compensation is compared to the Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged) average NAV return. Portfolio managers who manage more than one product may have other components in their formulaic calculation that are appropriate to the other products, weighted according to the proportion of the managers time that is allocated to each specific product. |
Second, 30% of the target incentive is based on financial measures of Virtus. These financial measures include: adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization; gross inflows, and product investment performance. A portion of the total incentive bonus can be paid in Virtus RSUs that vest over three years. |
The performance portion of portfolio managers incentive bonus compensation is not based on the value of assets held in the Funds portfolio (except to the extent that the level of assets in the Funds portfolio affects the advisory fee received by the Adviser and, thus indirectly, the profitability of Virtus). |
Other Benefits: Portfolio managers are eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan, health insurance, and other benefits offered generally to the firms employees that could include granting of RSUs in Virtus stock. |
Equity Ownership of Portfolio Managers |
The following table sets forth the dollar range of equity securities in the Fund beneficially owned, as of October 31, 2015, by each of the portfolio managers identified above. |
Name of Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Fund | |
Timothy M. Heaney |
$100,001-$500,000 | |
Lisa H. Leonard |
None |
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
During the period covered by this report, no purchases were made by or on behalf of the registrant or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of shares or other units of any class of the registrants equity securities that is registered by the registrant pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
No changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrants board of directors have been implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure
in response to the requirements of Item 22(b)(15) of Schedule 14A (i.e., in the registrants Proxy Statement dated April 3, 2013) or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act)) are effective, based on an evaluation of those controls and procedures made as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act.
(b) There has been no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS. |
(a) | Exhibit 99.CERT | Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
(b) | Exhibit 99.906CERT | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) | DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC. | |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ NATHAN I. PARTAIN | |
Nathan I. Partain | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
Date: December 30, 2015 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ NATHAN I. PARTAIN | |
Nathan I. Partain | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
Date: December 30, 2015 | ||
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ ALAN M. MEDER | |
Alan M. Meder | ||
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||
Date: December 30, 2015 |