Definitive Proxy Statement
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☐                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

  Preliminary Proxy Statement
  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
  Definitive Proxy Statement
  Definitive Additional Materials
  Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

IBERIABANK CORPORATION

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 

(2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 

(3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 

(4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 

(5)

 

Total fee paid:

 

     

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing:

 

(1)

 

Amount previously paid:

 

     

 

(2)

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 

(3)

 

Filing Party:

 

     

 

(4)

 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


Table of Contents

LOGO

 


Table of Contents

LOGO

April 7, 2017

To Our Shareholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of IBERIABANK Corporation to be held at the Windsor Court Hotel, 300 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, on Tuesday, May 9, 2017, at 4:00 p.m., Central Time.

The matters to be considered by shareholders at the Annual Meeting are described in the accompanying materials. Also enclosed is an Annual Report to Shareholders for 2016. Directors, officers, and other associates of the Company, as well as representatives of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, will be present to respond to any questions shareholders may have.

The Board of Directors welcomes and appreciates the interest of all our shareholders in the Company’s affairs and encourages those entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting to take the time to do so. We hope you will attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend, please vote your shares by signing, dating, and promptly returning the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying postage-paid envelope, by telephone using the toll-free telephone number printed on the proxy card, or by voting on the Internet using the instructions printed on the proxy card. This will ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting.

Even though you execute this proxy, vote by telephone or vote via the Internet, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company, by executing and delivering a later-dated proxy (either in writing, telephonically or via the Internet), or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you will be able to vote in person if you wish to do so, even if you have previously returned your proxy card, voted by telephone or via the Internet.

Your vote is important to us. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and your continued support of and interest in IBERIABANK Corporation.

Sincerely,                        

 

LOGO

Daryl G. Byrd

President and Chief Executive Officer

Phone 337-521-4012 • FAX 337-521-4021 • 200 West Congress Street • Post Office Box 52747 • Lafayette, LA 70505-2747


Table of Contents

IBERIABANK CORPORATION

200 WEST CONGRESS STREET

LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA 70501

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

to be Held on May 9, 2017

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of IBERIABANK Corporation will be held at the Windsor Court Hotel, 300 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, on Tuesday, May 9, 2017, at 4:00 p.m., Central Time, for the purpose of considering and acting on the following:

 

1. Election of three directors, each for a three-year term expiring in 2020;

 

2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017;

 

3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers;

 

4. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of Named Executive Officers; and

 

5. Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2017, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGO

Robert B. Worley, Jr.

Secretary

Lafayette, Louisiana

April 7, 2017

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 9, 2017

This Notice and Proxy Statement, the Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders and the Company’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 are available electronically at

http://www.iberiabank.com/globalassets/proxy-2017.pdf

 

Whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote by Internet or telephone, or complete the enclosed proxy and return promptly in the postage–paid envelope provided. If you vote by Internet or telephone, use the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote either in person or by proxy. Any proxy previously executed may be revoked by you in writing or in person at any time prior to its exercise.


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

 

    Page  
Introduction     1  
Questions and Answers     4  
Proposal I—Election of Directors     8  
Nominees for Terms to Expire in 2020     9  
Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2018     10  
Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2019     13  
Corporate Governance     16  
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management     19  
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance     22  
Committees of the Board of Directors     23  
Proposal II—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm     28  
Report of the Audit Committee     30  
Proposal III—Approval of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers     32  
Compensation Discussion and Analysis     33  
Executive Compensation     49  
Director Compensation     57  
Executive Officers     58  
Certain Transactions     60  

Proposal IV—Advisory Vote on Frequency of Voting on Named Executive Officer Compensation

    62  
Shareholder Proposals     64  
Other Matters     65  

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     i  


Table of Contents

IBERIABANK Corporation

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May 9, 2017

 

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to our shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors for use at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 9, 2017, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). We sometimes refer to IBERIABANK Corporation in this Proxy Statement as “the Company,” “IBKC,” “we,” “us,” or “our.”

Your proxy will be voted in the manner you specify if you vote properly and timely by the Internet or telephone or if you complete and return the enclosed proxy card. You

may revoke your proxy by notifying our Secretary in writing, by delivering a properly executed proxy of later date (either in writing, telephonically, or via the Internet) to the Secretary at or before the Annual Meeting, or by voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

This Proxy Statement was mailed on or about April 7, 2017, to each shareholder of record at the voting record date.

 

 

Introduction

 

This Proxy Statement provides an overview of matters that are very important to our shareholders and the continued success of our business. As described throughout this Proxy Statement, we made great progress in improving the financial performance and strength of our Company and, based on feedback from our shareholders, we made significant improvements in our executive compensation program and corporate governance matters. These enhancements were designed and implemented with a focus on improving future shareholder returns, ensuring alignment between performance and compensation, and adopting shareholder governance best practices consistent with our successful business model and risk tolerance.

In 2016, the Company saw the full benefit from the 2015 acquisitions of Florida Bank Group, Inc., Old Florida Bancshares, Inc., and Georgia Commerce Bancshares, Inc., growing net revenues by $74.9 million, or 9%, while also successfully containing expenses, which declined $3.6 million, or 1%, compared to 2015. We have grown our balance sheet organically in 2016 by $2.2 billion, or 11%, to $21.7 billion, which included loan growth of $737.5 million, or 5%, and deposit growth of $1.2 billion, or 8%. Our expansion and subsequent growth into new market areas through prior period acquisitions has helped

us diversify and manage our credit risk exposure. We have strengthened our liquidity and capital positions and have seen some downward pressure on net interest margin as a result, but expect that deployment of excess liquidity and capital in 2017 into higher yielding assets will subsequently improve our profitability metrics. We returned 33% of net income available to common shareholders through dividends and generated a 17% annual increase in diluted earnings per common share. The “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement provides a summary of our results compared to peers.

Our focus in 2016 was multi-faceted, and our accomplishments were broad-based:

Shareholder Focus

 

  Raised cash dividends on common stock by 6%;

 

  Announced share repurchase program of up to 950,000 common shares;

 

  Repurchased 202,506 common shares in 2016 at a weighted average cost of $57.61 per share;

 

  Common stock price reached an all-time high of $91.10 per share and improved 52% during 2016;
 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     1  


Table of Contents

Introduction

 

Efficiency Improvement

 

  Closed or consolidated 19 bank branches;

 

  Total assets increased 11%, while staffing declined 2%;

 

  Efficiency ratio improved from 71% in 2015 to 64% in 2016;

 

  Achieved strategic goal of 60% core tangible efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) during 2016;

Profitability Improvement

 

  In 2016, revenues increased $75 million, or 9% (twice the banking industry’s rate of growth), while expenses declined $4 million, or 1% (better than the banking industry’s results);

 

  Net income available to common shareholders increased $36 million, or 25%, and earnings per common share climbed 17%;

 

  Book value and tangible book value per common share increased 6% and 14%, respectively;

Risk Management

 

  Energy-related loans declined 18% in 2016, and declined as a percentage of total loans from 8.4% at June 30, 2014 to 3.7% at year-end 2016;

 

  Indirect automobile loans declined $115 million, or 47%, during 2016;

 

  Reduced aggregate “risk-off” assets by $797 million since year-end 2014;

 

  Terminated 12 outstanding FDIC loss share agreements;

Balance Sheet Strength

 

  Liquidity increased by $1.3 billion, or 66%, year-end 2015 to year-end 2016;

 

  Average loans grew $1.4 billion, or 10%, and average deposits grew $1.1 billion, or 7%;

 

  Very asset-sensitive balance sheet, so well-positioned for rising interest rate environment;

 

  Issued and sold preferred stock with net proceeds of $55 million;

 

  Issued and sold 3.6 million shares of common stock with net proceeds of $280 million;

Other Notable Achievements

 

  Record level of loan originations and renewals;
  Second highest level of annual mortgage loan originations and highest level of annual loan sales;

 

  Record level of customer derivative transactions and treasury management activity;

 

  Entered Greenville, South Carolina in December 2016; and

 

  Invested nearly $60 million in various community development projects, up 8% compared to 2015.

Our focus on continuous improvement in financial results over the last several years is similar to our focus on corporate governance and compensation matters, as evidenced by the following actions:

2008—Adopted over-boarding restrictions, Board resignation policy, stock ownership guidelines, and director education programs;

2009—Established Board Risk Management Committee;

2011—Implemented annual voting on say-on-pay;

2012—Adopted majority voting policy for uncontested elections;

2013—Adopted compensation recovery (“claw-back”) policy, committed to de-clawing blank check preferred stock, and finalized our mandatory director retirement age policy;

2014—Restructured executive compensation programs to be more quantitative and less qualitative; introduced performance-based long-term incentives; modified compensation benchmarking; publicly disclosed incentive metrics; commenced investor outreach; and

2016—Adopted 2016 Stock Incentive Plan and implemented various corporate governance improvements incorporating changes based on investor feedback.

We believe well-designed compensation programs strive to tie executive pay and performance through short-term and long-term incentives that are appropriately structured to manage the overall risk of the Company. Feedback from our shareholder engagement and outreach led us to make changes in our executive compensation program in 2016, including redesigning our short-term and long-term incentive programs, improving transparency associated with these programs, and providing greater weighting toward performance-based compensation. Executive salaries and targeted incentive programs were frozen at 2015 levels for the 2016 year.

 

 

2   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Introduction

 

In addition, our Board is focused on Board refreshment and enhanced committee rotation. In 2016, we implemented corporate governance policy changes including raising stock ownership guidelines, prohibiting new excise tax gross-ups, moving to “double-trigger” mechanisms in new change-in-control severance agreements, and restricting pledging of Company stock. We recognize the importance to our shareholders of appropriate risk management and Board independence.

This year, we are asking our common shareholders to vote on four important matters:

 

  The election of three directors, all three of whom are incumbent directors;

 

  The ratification of appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm;

 

  The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, or NEOs (also called “Say-on-Pay”); and
  The approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of Name Executive Officers.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Codes of Ethics, Conflicts of Interest Policies, and Board Committee charters are available on the “Investor Relations” portion of the Company’s website at www.iberiabank.com under “Resources” and then “Corporate Governance”.

Importantly, we listen to our shareholders, we value your support, and we encourage you to share your opinions and suggestions with us. You can reach us by e-mail at investor@iberiabank.com, call us at 337-521-4012, or write to us at IBERIABANK Corporation, c/o Investor Relations, 200 West Congress Street, 12th Floor, Lafayette, LA 70501.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     3  


Table of Contents

Questions and Answers

 

Who may vote?

You may vote if you were a holder of IBERIABANK Corporation (“IBKC” or the “Company”) common stock at the close of business on March 21, 2017, which is the record date of the Annual Meeting. Each share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Holders of our outstanding shares of preferred stock do not have voting rights at the Annual Meeting.

Participants in our Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) will receive a Voting Authorization Form for the common stock owned through the Plan. If you hold shares as a participant in the Plan and you do not provide the Plan trustees with voting instructions on any matter (either by not returning a Voting Authorization Form or voting by phone or online or due to incomplete voting instructions) and you do not vote in person by attending the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions were provided by other participants. The Voting Authorization Form will serve as voting instructions for trustees of the Plan.

 

What may I vote on?

You may vote on:

 

  The election of three nominees to serve as directors, for three-year terms expiring in 2020;

 

  The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017;

 

  Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;

 

  Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of Named Executive officers; and

 

  Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

How does the Board of Directors recommend I vote?

The Board recommends that you vote:

 

  FOR each of the nominees for director;

 

  FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017;
  FOR the approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers; and

 

  FOR a ONE YEAR advisory vote on executive compensation.

 

If I am a shareholder of record of IBKC shares, how do I cast my vote?

If you are a holder of record of IBKC common stock, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We will give you a ballot at the Annual Meeting.

If you do not wish to vote in person or if you will not be attending the Annual Meeting, you may vote by proxy. If you received a printed copy of these proxy materials by mail, you may vote by proxy using the enclosed proxy card, vote by proxy on the Internet, or vote by proxy over the telephone. The procedures for voting by proxy are as follows:

 

  To vote by proxy using the enclosed proxy card (if you received a printed copy of these proxy materials by mail), complete, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided;

 

  To vote by proxy on the Internet, go to www.investorvote.com/ibkc to complete an electronic proxy card. You will need the 15-digit Control Number included on your proxy card; or

 

  To vote by proxy over the telephone, dial 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) (the toll-free phone number listed on your proxy card under the heading “Vote by telephone”) using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions.

If you vote by mail, your proxy must be received by 11:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 9, 2017, to be counted.

You may vote on the Internet or by telephone any time prior to 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 9, 2017.

We provide Internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares on-line, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.

 

 

4   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Questions and Answers

 

If I am a beneficial owner of IBKC shares held in street name, how do I vote?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares of IBKC common stock held in street name (i.e., your shares are held by a broker) and you received a printed copy of these proxy materials by mail, you should have received a voting instruction card with these proxy materials from the organization that is the record owner of your shares rather than from us. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you received a notice by mail, you should have received the notice from the organization that is the record owner of your shares rather than from us. Beneficial owners that received a printed copy of these proxy materials by mail from the record owner may complete and mail that voting instruction card or may vote by telephone or over the Internet as instructed by that organization in the voting instruction card. Beneficial owners that received a notice by mail from the record owner should follow the instructions included in the notice to view the Proxy Statement and transmit their voting instructions. If you provide specific voting instructions, your broker or nominee will vote your shares as you direct.

A beneficial owner planning to vote in person at the Annual Meeting must obtain a valid proxy from the record owner. To request the requisite proxy form, follow the instructions provided by your broker or contact your broker.

 

May I change my vote?

If you are a holder of record of shares of IBKC common stock, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting by:

 

  Voting again by telephone or over the Internet;

 

  Sending us a proxy card dated later than your last vote;

 

  Notifying the Secretary of IBKC in writing; or

 

  Voting at the Annual Meeting.

 

How many votes do the proposals need in order to be approved?

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast (Proposal I). Shareholders may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for each nominee for the

Board of Directors. If you withhold authority to vote with respect to any nominee, your shares will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum, but will have no effect on the election of that nominee.

Our Board has adopted a majority voting policy which applies to an uncontested election of directors. Under this policy, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHOLD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election is required to promptly tender his or her resignation following certification by the Secretary of the shareholder vote. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would then consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our Board as to the action to be taken. This policy does not apply in contested elections. For more information, see “Proposal I—Election of Directors—Majority Voting for Directors; Director Resignation Policy.”

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes actually cast is required for: (i) ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal II), (ii) approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers (Proposal III), and (iii) approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of Named Executive Officers (Proposal IV). Shareholders may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN” on Proposal II and Proposal III. Shareholders may vote “FOR” a frequency of “ONE YEAR,” “TWO YEARS,” or “THREE YEARS” or “ABSTAIN” on Proposal IV. If you abstain from voting on Proposal II, III or IV, your shares will be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum, but will not be counted as a vote cast for the proposal and will have no effect on the proposal.

If you are the registered holder of IBKC common stock and you sign and submit your proxy card without voting instructions, your shares will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum, and will be voted “FOR” each director nominee and “FOR” each of Proposals II and III, and “FOR” a frequency of “ONE YEAR” with respect to Proposal IV.

 

Is cumulative voting permitted for the election of directors?

No. You may not accumulate your vote for the election of directors.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     5  


Table of Contents

Questions and Answers

 

What are broker non-votes?

A broker “non-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for your shares but does not indicate a vote for a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote and has not received specific instructions from you. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, if your broker holds your shares (i.e., your shares are held in “street name”) and delivers this Proxy Statement to you, the broker generally has authority to vote the shares on “routine” matters. Proposal II is a matter we believe will be considered “routine”; even if the broker does not receive instructions from you, the broker is entitled to vote your shares in connection with Proposal II. The other Proposals (I, III and IV) are matters we believe will be considered “non-routine”; the broker is not entitled to vote your shares without instructions. Shares held in street name which have been designated by brokers as not voted (“broker non-votes”) will not be counted as votes cast. Broker non-votes, however, will be treated as shares present for purposes of determining a quorum. Brokers who are not members of the New York Stock Exchange may not be able to exercise discretionary authority with respect to even routine items depending on the rules of the exchange or market of which the broker is a member.

 

How many outstanding shares of IBKC common stock are there?

At the close of business on March 21, 2017, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting, there were 50,970,076 shares of IBKC common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding and entitled to vote.

 

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of our total voting power will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2017, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

 

Will my vote be confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

How will voting be conducted on other matters raised at the Annual Meeting?

The form of proxy confers discretionary authority on the persons named therein to vote with respect to the election of any person as a director where the nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve. It also confers discretionary authority with respect to matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting and with respect to any other matter presented to the Annual Meeting if notice of such matter has not been delivered to us in accordance with our Articles of Incorporation. Except for procedural matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, we do not know of any other matters that are to come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting as to which proxies in the accompanying form confer discretionary authority, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote the shares represented by such proxies on such matters as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors.

 

Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

We will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing, and distributing these proxy materials and soliciting votes. If you choose to access the proxy materials and/or vote over the Internet, you are responsible for Internet access charges you may incur. If you choose to vote by telephone, you are responsible for telephone charges you may incur. Additional solicitations of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone, or by electronic communication by our directors, officers, and other regular associates, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. We also have hired Georgeson LLC to assist us in the distribution of proxy materials. We will pay Georgeson LLC a fee of $8,500, plus customary costs and expenses for these services, and we will indemnify Georgeson LLC against any losses arising out of Georgeson LLC’s proxy solicitation services on our behalf. We will reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses for forwarding materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by others.

 

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting and the Board’s decision regarding the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation?

We will disclose voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange

 

 

6   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Questions and Answers

 

Commission (“SEC”) within four business days after the Annual Meeting, which will also be available on our website. We will also disclose in the Form 8-K how frequent the Company will hold future non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation.

 

When must shareholder proposals be submitted for the 2017 Annual Meeting?

Shareholder proposals submitted for inclusion in our 2017 Proxy Statement must have been received in writing by our Secretary no later than the close of business on December 5, 2016. Shareholder proposals submitted outside the process for inclusion in the Proxy Statement must have been received from shareholders of record no later than March 5, 2017.

 

I share an address with another shareholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials and 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials and Annual Report?

A single proxy statement and 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders, along with multiple proxy cards representing each shareholder account, will be delivered

in one envelope to multiple shareholders having the same last name and address and to individuals with more than one account registered at Computershare with the same address unless contrary instructions have been received from an affected shareholder.

If you would like to enroll in this service or receive individual copies of all documents, now or in the future, please contact Computershare by calling 1-800-368-5948 or writing Computershare, P.O. Box 30170, College Station, TX 77842-3170. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of all documents to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered upon request to Computershare.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     7  


Table of Contents

Proposal I—Election of Directors

Directors and Nominees

 

Our Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board of Directors will be divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible, with each class elected by the shareholders for staggered three-year terms. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to elect one class of directors, consisting of three directors, for three-year terms expiring in 2020. The nominees of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors are currently directors and have not been nominated pursuant to any other arrangement or understanding with any person. Shareholders are not entitled to cumulate their votes for the election of directors.

Our Bylaws currently provide for a Board of 11 persons. The eligibility-age limit under our Bylaws for the nomination and election of directors is 76 years.

Unless otherwise directed, each proxy executed and returned by a shareholder will be voted “FOR” the election of the three nominees listed below. In the

unanticipated event that any nominee is unable or unwilling to stand for election at the time of the Annual Meeting, the Bylaws provide that the number of authorized directors will be automatically reduced by the number of such nominees unless the Board determines otherwise, in which case proxies will be voted for any replacement nominee or nominees recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. At this time, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee knows of no reason why any of the nominees might be unable to serve, if elected.

Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to nominate candidates with diverse experiences and perspectives who have the ability to contribute to some aspects of our business and a willingness to make the significant commitment of time and effort required of our directors. Community involvement and leadership are important criteria for our Board members. Each of the nominees listed below possesses these attributes.

 

 

Majority Voting for Directors; Director Resignation Policy

 

In 2012, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to our Corporate Governance Guidelines regarding majority voting for directors. The Board reviewed corporate governance developments and an interested shareholder proposal on the subject of majority voting in the election of directors. The Board concluded that when shareholder “WITHHOLD” votes exceed “FOR” votes with regard to a director nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board should carefully consider and assess whether it would be appropriate for the director nominee to remain on the Board.

As amended, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in an uncontested director election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHOLD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”) would promptly tender his or her resignation following certification by the Secretary of the shareholder vote. The current plurality vote standard will be retained for contested director elections (elections in which the number of director nominees exceeds the number of Board seats).

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee would promptly consider the resignation offer, and a range of possible responses based on the circumstances that led to the Majority Withheld Vote, if known, and make a recommendation to the Board. The Board would act on the Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote.

If each member of the Committee received a Majority Withheld Vote at the same election, then the directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote would consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept them. If three or fewer directors failed to receive a Majority Withheld Vote, all directors may participate in the action regarding the resignation offers. Any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to the Guidelines would not participate in the Committee’s recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept his or her individual offer to resign. Thereafter, the Board would promptly disclose its decision-making process and decision regarding whether to accept the director’s resignation offer (or the reason(s) for rejecting the resignation offer, if applicable) in a Current Report on Form 8-K furnished to the SEC.

 

 

8   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proposal I—Election of Directors

 

A link to the Corporate Governance Guidelines is on the “Investor Relations” portion of the Company’s website, at http://www.iberiabank.com.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COMPANY’S SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES BELOW.

Nominees for Terms to Expire in 2020

 

Harry V. Barton, Jr.

• Resides in Lafayette, LA

• Director Since 1993

• 62 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Audit (Chairman), Executive and Nominating and Corporate Governance

Harry V. Barton, Jr. is the owner of Barton Advisory Services, LLC and Harry V. Barton CPA, LLC where he is a Registered Investment Advisor and Certified Public Accountant. In 2009, he earned the AICPA designation of Personal Financial Specialist. Mr. Barton has over 30 years of experience in the accounting industry. His expertise in the industry includes audit, review and compilation of financial statements, as well as the preparation of individual and corporate tax returns and tax planning for business and high net worth clients. He is also experienced in consulting and advising on business mergers and acquisitions.

A native of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Mr. Barton is a graduate of the University of Louisiana at Lafayette where he earned his Bachelor of Science in Business Administration. He is a Member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Personal Financial Planning Section, Tax Section, State Society of Louisiana CPAs and the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce. He has been a member of the State Society of Louisiana CPAs Business Consulting and Personal Financial Planning Committees and served on the Board of the Lafayette General Hospital Membership Corporation. He has also served as past Chairman of the Community Foundation of Acadiana-Professional Advisors Sub-Committee.

Mr. Barton’s accounting, tax, and investment advisory experience, as well as his contacts in the local community, are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and as Chairman of the Audit Committee and provide significant value to the Board.

E. Stewart Shea, III

• Resides in New Iberia, LA

• Director Since 1990

• 65 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Board Risk, Compensation (Chairman), Executive and Nominating and Corporate Governance

E. Stewart Shea, III is Vice Chairman of the Board of IBERIABANK Corporation and IBERIABANK. Mr. Shea has served on the IBERIABANK Board of Directors since 1990 and currently serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Co-Chairman of IBERIABANK’s New Iberia Advisory Board.

Mr. Shea earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Construction Technology and a Masters degree in Business Administration from Louisiana State University. He began his career working for Houston-based M.W. Kellogg, a company specializing in heavy industrial construction. In 1975, he joined The Bayou Companies, LLC, a 65-year-old fourth generation family owned and operated business which provided various services to the domestic offshore and onshore gas pipeline industry, as well as, to international markets and which was headquartered at the Port of Iberia in New Iberia, Louisiana. In 1991, the company formed Bayou Coating, LLC, through a joint venture. This entity, headquartered in Baker, Louisiana, specialized in the application of external corrosion and internal flow assurance coatings to the domestic and international oil and gas pipeline markets. In 2005 Bayou acquired Commercial Coating Services International, based in Conroe, Texas; this company offered custom coating, field applied girth weld services and lubricity coatings for the expanded tubular market. During his last 15 years with the company, Mr. Shea served in the capacity of Managing Partner for all of the Bayou affiliated entities and also sat on the Board of Directors. The company was sold to a publicly traded company in February 2009 in an asset based transaction. Mr. Shea continues to manage the remaining stock company now known as Bayou Holdings Company, LLC, serving in the capacity of Managing Partner/President, and he sits on the Board. He is also actively involved in other investments.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     9  


Table of Contents

Nominees for Terms to Expire in 2020

 

Mr. Shea has been civically involved in the New Iberia and Acadiana communities and has served as past Chairman of The Iberia Industrial Development Foundation and the Port of Iberia Business Association; he has served on the Boards of Epiphany Day School, Catholic High School and the Community Foundation of Acadiana. Mr. Shea was on the Board of, and served as Chairman of, INGAA (Interstate Natural Gas Association of America), an organization comprised of pipeline companies that are in the business of transporting natural gas. Having 35 years of experience in owning and managing an oil and gas service company has given Mr. Shea additional insight and connectivity into the communities and markets that IBERIABANK serves.

Mr. Shea’s business experience and contacts both in the oil and gas pipeline industries and in the communities and markets served by IBERIABANK, as well as his long-term relationship with and service to IBERIABANK, are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

David H. Welch

• Resides in Lafayette, LA

• Director Since 2005

• 68 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Board Risk, Investment and Nominating and Corporate Governance

David H. Welch is President and Chief Executive Officer of Stone Energy Corporation. He has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Stone Energy since 2004. Stone Energy is an independent oil

and natural gas company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation, development and operation of oil and gas properties. Prior to joining Stone Energy, Dr. Welch worked for BP Amoco or its predecessors for 26 years, where his final role was Senior Vice President, BP America Inc.

Dr. Welch has a petroleum engineering degree from Louisiana State University and a doctoral degree in chemical engineering and economics from Tulane University. He has completed the Harvard Business School advanced management program and executive development programs at Stanford Business School and Cambridge University.

Dr. Welch has served as Chairman of the Offshore Energy Center, Chairman of the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce and Chairman of the United Way in Acadiana. He currently serves as Chairman and executive director of the National Ocean Industries Association, a trustee of The Nature Conservancy of Louisiana, a director of the Offshore Energy Center, a director of Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, and a director of the Upper Lafayette Economic Development Foundation. He also serves on the executive committee of the Board of Directors of the Acadiana Symphony Orchestra, and is a director of Ready Nation, a CEO group dedicated to early childhood education.

Dr. Welch’s experience and relationships in the energy industry, his experience as the chief executive officer and a director of another publicly traded company and his contacts in communities served by IBERIABANK are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

 

 

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2018

 

Ernest P. Breaux, Jr.

• Resides in New Iberia, LA

• Director Since 1999

• 72 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Board Risk, Investment (Chairman) and Nominating and Corporate Governance

Ernest P. Breaux, Jr. was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ernest P. Breaux Electrical, Inc., an

electrical contracting company from 2005-2010 and a consultant to that company until 2013. The company, headquartered in New Iberia, Louisiana, specializes in all fields of electrical instruction. Mr. Breaux was also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Equipment Tool Rental and Supply, Inc., Iberia Investment Group, LLC, and Iberia Investments Land Holdings, LLC. In September 2010, Mr. Breaux retired.

 

 

10   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2018

 

A native of New Iberia, Louisiana, Mr. Breaux was heavily involved in the electrical industry and within the communities he served. He continues to be an active member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Louisiana Engineering Society (Registered Engineer), Associated Builders and Contractors (Past President) and the Iberia Industrial Development Foundation (Past Chairman). He is also a past member of the National Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee, Education Industry and Business Council (Past Co-Chairman), State of Louisiana Licensing Board for Contractors, State of Louisiana Work Force Development (under Governor Mike Foster) and the Vision 2000 Commission (City of New Iberia, Louisiana). From January 2011 to December 2013, he was a member of the Finance Committee of the Community Foundation of Acadiana.

His honors include the Patterson Award as Outstanding Electrical Apprentice of Southwest Chapter of NECA (NJATC) in 1967, Merit Shop Man of the Year (Associated Builders and Contractors) in 1992, the Integrity Award (Lafayette Better Business Bureau) in 1997, Outstanding Service as Chairman of Education, Industry and Business (Iberia Industrial Development Foundation) in 2001, Beam Club Award Recipient (ABC) in 2002 and the A.B. Paterson Medal for an Engineer in Management in 2005.

From 2001-2004, Mr. Breaux was Regional Operating Officer for Regions 1, 4 and Gulf Plains of Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. (“IES”). In August 2007, the SEC filed a complaint in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, against IES and certain of its former officers and associates, including Mr. Breaux. The complaint alleged that the former officers and associates aided and abetted IES’s violations of Sections 13(a) and 13(b) (2) (A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. On August 30, 2007, Mr. Breaux, without admitting or denying the alleged disclosure and accounting violations, agreed to settle the SEC’s action by consenting to a permanent injunction against future violations.

Mr. Breaux’s business experience and contacts in the local community are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

Daryl G. Byrd

• Resides in New Orleans, LA

• Director Since 1999

• 62 Years of Age

• Not Independent

• Committees: Executive and Investment

Daryl G. Byrd is President and Chief Executive Officer of IBERIABANK Corporation and IBERIABANK headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana. He also serves on the Board of Directors of each organization.

A native of Columbia, South Carolina, Mr. Byrd began his banking career with Trust Company Bank of Georgia (now SunTrust) in 1980. In 1985, he moved from North Carolina having worked for BB&T, to Louisiana to lead commercial lending activities for First National Bank of Lafayette, a subsidiary of First Commerce Corporation. In 1990, Mr. Byrd was named President and CEO of Rapides Bank and Trust Company in Alexandria, another subsidiary bank of First Commerce Corporation. In 1992, he moved to First National Bank of Commerce, the lead bank for First Commerce Corporation, as Executive Vice President in charge of the commercial banking and mortgage banking groups. During his tenure in New Orleans with First Commerce, he also managed the strategic development for multiple businesses and had responsibility for other business lines and support functions. Following the First Commerce/Bank One merger, Mr. Byrd was named President and CEO of Bank One, Louisiana, New Orleans region. He joined IBERIABANK Corporation and IBERIABANK in mid-1999.

From January 2011 until December 2013, Mr. Byrd was the Federal Advisory Council representative for the Sixth District of the Federal Reserve System and a member of the Federal Advisory Council, which is composed of 12 representatives of the banking industry and consults with and advises the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on matters within the Board’s jurisdiction.

Some of Mr. Byrd’s current community and civic affiliations include Greater New Orleans Foundation, board member; Eaglebrook School—Deerfield, Massachusetts, member board of trustees; Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, board member and executive committee member; The Order of St. John, member; Committee of 100, member; Tulane Business School Council, member; National WWII Museum, board; New Orleans Jazz Orchestra, board; New Orleans Museum of Art, board; The University of Alabama, Culverhouse College of Commerce, Board of Visitors, member; The University of Alabama Birmingham, Collat School of Business, Deans Advisory Council, member; Financial Services Roundtable, board, Mid-Sized Bank Group, board; and New Orleans Business Council, board member.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     11  


Table of Contents

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2018

 

Mr. Byrd earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Samford University in 1976 and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 1978.

Mr. Byrd’s banking experience, his knowledge of our products and services and the regulatory environment in which we operate, as well as his relationships in the banking and financial industries are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

John N. Casbon

• Resides in New Orleans, LA

• Director Since 2001

• 68 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Board Risk (Chairman), Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance

John N. Casbon serves as Executive Vice President of First American Title Insurance Company, a member of The First American Corporation (NYSE: FAF) family of companies. He has been associated with FAF for over 30 years.

A Florida native, Mr. Casbon graduated from Florida State University with degrees in both Real Estate Finance and Hotel Management and a major in marketing. As a community leader, he works to encourage businesses to assume pro-active civic roles for the betterment and improvement of New Orleans, Louisiana. He founded the New Orleans Police Foundation in 1995 for the purpose of linking businesses with the police department. He is Past Chairman of the Board of the Police Foundation. Mr. Casbon serves or has served on the boards of the American Land Title Association, the LSU Department of Psychiatry Advisory Board, the Louisiana Trooper Foundation, the Business Council of New Orleans and the River Region and The New Orleans/River Region Chamber of Commerce. He is a member of the Louisiana World Presidents’ Organization. Mr. Casbon received the 1998 FBI Director’s Community Leadership Award for his role in creating and leading the New Orleans Police Foundation, and was also the recipient of the Anti-Defamation League’s 1998 A.I. Botnick Torch of Liberty Award. In 1999, he was awarded the Mayor’s Medal of

Honor and in 2014 Mr. Casbon received the National Civil Rights Award from the National Urban League.

Mr. Casbon’s experience in the title insurance industry and his knowledge of and contacts in markets served by IBERIABANK are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

John E. Koerner III

• Resides in New Orleans, LA

• Director Since 2012

• 74 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Audit, Board Risk and Nominating and Corporate Governance

John E. Koerner III has been the managing member of Koerner Capital, LLC, a private investment company, or the President of its predecessor, Koerner Capital Corporation, since 1995. From 1976 to 1995, he was President and co-owner of Barq’s, Inc. and its subsidiary, The Delaware Punch Company.

Mr. Koerner has been a director of Lamar Advertising Company since 2007, and is a member of that board’s audit and nominating and corporate governance committees. He serves on a number of other business boards, including Geocent, LLC and Adaptive Wireless Solutions. Mr. Koerner was a director of Legg Mason, Inc. from 1990 to 2014.

Mr. Koerner is a member of a number of civic boards including The Nature Conservancy of Louisiana, of which he is Chairman of the Board of Trustees, and the World War II Museum. He served as Chairman of the New Orleans Regional Chamber of Commerce for 1995, was a past Co-Chairman of Metrovision, and was the 2002-2003 Chairman of the New Orleans Business Council.

Mr. Koerner has extensive experience in corporate finance, the management of capital intensive organizations, and capital markets. Through his service on other boards, Mr. Koerner also has experience with a broad range of corporate governance matters.

Mr. Koerner’s professional background and civic board service are among his qualifications to serve on and add significant value to the Board.

 

 

12   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2019

 

Elaine D. Abell

• Resides in Lafayette, LA

• Director Since 1993

• 75 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Audit, Investment, and Nominating and Corporate Governance

Elaine D. Abell is an attorney and the President of the Board of Directors for Fountain Memorial Funeral Home and Cemetery.

Ms. Abell is very engaged in the community, where she currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Women’s Foundation of Acadiana (Past Chairman), the Lafayette Metropolitan Expressway Commission (Chairman), the University Medical Center Management Corporation (New Orleans) (Secretary/Treasurer), the Louisiana State University (“LSU”) Research and Technology Foundation, LSU Honors College Advisory Council, the LSU Press and Southern Review Advisory Board, and the Board of Directors of the Lafayette Central Park.

She is Past Chairman and former member of the LSU Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State Mineral Board, the Community Foundation of Acadiana, and the Citizens Advisory Committee of the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Ms. Abell served on the Executive Committee of the Commission on Colleges (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools). She also served on the Council for a Better Louisiana Board, the Academy of the Sacred Heart Board of Trustees, a founding Board Member of Women’s and Children’s Hospital of Acadiana, and is a Leadership Louisiana Member. She has been on the Junior League of Lafayette Board, and was Past President of Southwest Louisiana Educational and Referral Center.

Ms. Abell has worked extensively with the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce Board where she served on the Executive Committee. Her honors include induction into the LSU Alumni Association’s Hall of Distinction in 1997, designation in Women Who Mean Business (Times of Acadiana) in 2006, recipient of the Leah Hipple McKay Memorial Award for Outstanding Volunteerism presented by the Louisiana State Bar Association in 2007, recognition as a Louisiana Pathfinder in 2011 by the Women’s Summit, and recipient of the League of Women Voters of Lafayette “Making a Lifetime of Difference Award” 2015.

Ms. Abell’s legal experience, her community service and her contacts in markets served by IBERIABANK are among her qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

Angus R. Cooper II

• Resides in Point Clear, AL

• Director Since 2012

• 75 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committee: Board Risk, Investment and Nominating and Corporate Governance

Angus R. Cooper II is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cooper/T. Smith Corporation, which is headquartered in Mobile, Alabama. Cooper/T. Smith Corporation is one of America’s oldest and largest stevedoring and maritime-related firms with operations on all three U.S. coasts, including the ports of New Orleans, Louisiana, Mobile, Alabama, and Houston, Texas, as well as foreign operations in Central and South America. The company has also diversified its business interests, including warehousing, terminal operations, tugboats, push boats and barging, and timber business.

Mr. Cooper is a native of Mobile, Alabama. Mr. Cooper earned his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Alabama in 1964. In 1995, he received the Transportation Award from the College of Commerce and Business Administration at the University of Alabama.

Mr. Cooper currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Coast Guard Foundation and Crescent Towing and Salvage Co., Inc. He formerly served on the Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama System. He is Vice President of the Crimson Tide Foundation and is a member of the Chief Executives Organization, Inc. He is Chairman of the Senior Bowl, and of the Mobile Arts and Sports Association, and a member of the Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce, Mobile Carnival Association, Mobile Touchdown Club, Eastern Shore Art Association, and the World Trade Center. Mr. Cooper is Honorary Chair for the Alabama Kidney Foundation. He was a former Co-Chairman of the Mobile Area United States Olympic Committee. In 2014 he was appointed to the Audubon Commission board. In 1998, he received the World Trade Club Award. In 2004, he received the Bank One Junior Achievement Award and, in 2005, he was chosen as a Role Model for the Young Leadership Council. He was named “Maritime Person of the Year 2005” by the Propeller Club of New Orleans. He also received the 14th International Maritime Hall of Fame Award in 2007. In 2009, Mr. Cooper was inducted into

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     13  


Table of Contents

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2019

 

the Alabama Academy of Honor and in 2013 he was inducted into the Alabama Business Hall of Fame. He also formerly served as Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, and a Director of the Federal Reserve Bank, Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding, Inc., Boy Scouts of America, Children’s Hospital, and Mississippi Valley Bulk Exporters Council. Mr. Cooper is a regional director for Who’s Who in U.S. Companies, World Presidents’ Organization, World Business Council and the Executive Hall of Fame.

Mr. Cooper previously served on the Board of Directors of Whitney Holding Corporation from 1994 until its merger in 2011 with Hancock Holding Company.

Mr. Cooper’s experience as the chief executive officer of a large and diversified international company, his insight into markets served by IBERIABANK, business background and relationships, and his knowledge of the banking industry are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

William H. Fenstermaker

• Resides in Lafayette, LA

• Director Since 1990

• 68 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Compensation, Executive (Chairman) and Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chairman)

William H. Fenstermaker is Chairman of the Board of IBERIABANK Corporation and IBERIABANK.

Mr. Fenstermaker is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of C.H. Fenstermaker and Associates, LLC., a surveying, mapping, engineering and environmental consulting company that has been serving the oil and gas industry for over 65 years. He has been employed in this capacity since 1971, is responsible for the financial and operational stability of the company and also serves as Chief Risk Officer. The company is headquartered in Lafayette, Louisiana, with offices in Houston, Texas, New Orleans, Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, San Antonio, Texas, Lake Charles, Louisiana, and Midland Texas. The geographical coverage of his company gives him additional insight and connectivity into communities IBERIABANK also serves. Mr. Fenstermaker’s experience in the energy industry provides IBERIABANK additional depth in a segment that we have targeted as a growth opportunity.

Mr. Fenstermaker is not only recognized as a leader in his field, but a leader in the state of Louisiana. Mr. Fenstermaker is a member of the World Presidents’ Organization, Chief Executives Organization, and the Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society. He serves on the Board of Trustees of Lafayette General Medical Center (as its Immediate Past Chairman), the largest full-service medical facility serving the Acadiana region, the Community Foundation of Acadiana and the Louisiana Tennis Foundation. Mr. Fenstermaker also sits on the Board and is Past Chairman of the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, Chairman of the University of Louisiana-Lafayette Foundation, Board of Directors and Past Chairman of the University of Louisiana Executive Advisory Council, Advisory Board of the Louisiana Geographical Survey, and the Board of Directors and Past Chairman of the Louisiana Oil and Gas Association and is a founder, Past Chairman, and Trustee of Blueprint Louisiana. The list of the key roles he has played with local non-profit, civic and business organizations is indicative of his commitment to the Lafayette community. His honors include Business Person of the Year (Times of Acadiana) in 1998, the Lafayette Civic Cup in 1999, the Boy Scouts of America Distinguished Citizen Award in 2001, and the Executive of the Year (Acadiana Business Magazine) in 2009. He also received an Honorary Doctorate of Science Degree from the University of Louisiana-Lafayette in 2003.

Mr. Fenstermaker’s business experience and relationships, his contacts in communities served by IBERIABANK and in the State of Louisiana, and his long-term relationship with and service to IBERIABANK are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

Rick E. Maples

• Resides in Longboat Key, FL

• Director Since 2016

• 58 Years of Age

• Independent

• Committees: Audit, Compensation, Board Risk and Nominating and Corporate Governance

Rick E. Maples retired after 31 years at Stifel, Nicolaus and Company Incorporated (“Stifel Nicolaus”) and became a Senior Advisor to Stifel Financial Corp. (“Stifel Financial”) in January 2016. Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Stifel Financial is a diversified financial services holding company which conducts business through several subsidiaries. Its primary broker dealer subsidiary is Stifel Nicolaus, which is a full service brokerage and investment banking firm. Mr. Maples joined Stifel Nicolaus in 1984 as

 

 

14   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2019

 

part of its investment banking team, focusing initially on the real estate industry, and, in 1989, banking and financial services. In 1991, he became Stifel Nicolaus’ Head of Investment Banking. In 2005, with Stifel Financial’s acquisition of Legg Mason Capital Markets, Mr. Maples became Co-Head of Investment Banking for the combined investment bank and maintained his role as Senior Managing Director, heading the Financial Institutions Group. He continued in that role until the end of 2015. In February 2013, Stifel acquired Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (“KBW”), an investment banking firm specializing in investment banking services to the financial services industry, and merged its financial institutions group into KBW. At that time, Mr. Maples was named Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Global Investment Banking of KBW.

Mr. Maples’ investment banking experience includes involvement in a large number of capital raising and merger and acquisition transactions for bank holding

companies as well as other types of financial institutions. Those transactions have ranged in value up to $2.5 billion. Mr. Maples is frequently quoted in the American Banker and other financial services publications with respect to the market for raising capital and mergers and acquisitions.

Mr. Maples received a Bachelor’s of Science in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from the University of Alabama. Mr. Maples is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Mr. Maples’ investment banking experience and relationships, as well as his extensive insight into market conditions, mergers and acquisitions, and other topics impacting the financial services industry, are among his qualifications to serve on the Board of Directors and provide significant value to the Board.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     15  


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

Board of Directors and Shareholders Meetings

 

The Board of Directors met 13 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. All directors attended at least 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board of Directors and assigned committees in 2016. We encourage directors’ attendance at our annual shareholder meetings

and request that directors make reasonable efforts to attend such meetings. All of the members of the Board of Directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

Pursuant to our Bylaws, at the first meeting of each newly elected Board of Directors, or at such other time when there is a vacancy, the Board solicits input and nominations from its members and elects one of its members as Chairman to serve at the Board’s pleasure. The Chairman presides over each Board meeting and performs such other duties as may be incident to the office.

 

Although our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines would allow our Chairman to hold the position of Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), it is the current policy of the Board to separate these offices. This separation allows our Chairman to maintain an independent role in management oversight. The Chairman of the Board also chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

 

 

Risk Management

 

Our Board of Directors recognizes that risk management is an enterprise–wide responsibility. Our Board assumes a significant role in risk management both through its actions as a whole and through its committees.

 

  The Board Risk Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities with respect to oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management framework, including significant policies and practices used in managing strategic, credit, liquidity, market, operational, compliance, reputational, legal and certain other risks. The Board Risk Committee’s role and its relationship and interaction with the Board and other committees regarding risk oversight are more fully described under “Committees of the Board—Board Risk Committee” and “Committee Interaction.”

 

  The Compensation Committee evaluates, with our senior officers, risks posed by our compensation programs and seeks to limit any unnecessary or excessive risks these programs may pose to us, in order to avoid programs that might encourage such risks. The Compensation Committee’s role and its relationship and interaction with the Board, the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee are more fully described under “Committees of the Board—Compensation Committee,” “Committee Interaction” and “Compensation Committee Report.”
  The Audit Committee reviews our systems to manage and monitor financial risk with management and our internal audit department. The Audit Committee’s role and its relationship and interaction with the Board, the Board Risk Committee and the Compensation Committee are more fully described under “Committees of the Board—Audit Committee” and “Committee Interaction.”

While each of these committees is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of these risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

In addition, the Board of Directors and the CEO have appointed a Chief Risk Officer, who is an executive officer of the Company, to support the risk oversight responsibilities of the Board and its committees, and to oversee the corporation’s enterprise-wide risk management program, including various management committees. The Chief Risk Officer also manages a team of senior officers who are assigned responsibility for oversight of particular risks and serves as the chairman of the Management Risk Committee.

 

 

16   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

 

Board of Directors Independence

 

Each year, the Board of Directors reviews the relationships that each director has with us and with other parties. Only those directors who do not have any of the categorical relationships that preclude them from being independent within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards and who the Board of Directors affirmatively determines have no relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director are considered to be “independent directors.” The Board of Directors has reviewed a number of factors to evaluate the independence of each of its members. These factors include its members’ relationships with us and our

competitors, suppliers and clients; their relationships with management and other directors; the relationships their current and former employers have with us; and the relationships between us and other companies of which our Board members are directors or executive officers. After evaluating these factors, the Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Abell and Messrs. Barton, Breaux, Casbon, Cooper, Fenstermaker, Koerner, Maples, Shea and Welch are independent directors of IBERIABANK Corporation within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards. Independent Board members met in executive session without management present three times during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

 

Shareholder Communications

 

Shareholders may communicate directly with members of the Board of Directors or the individual chairperson of a standing Board of Directors’ committee by writing directly to those individuals at the following address: 200 West Congress Street, Lafayette, Louisiana, 70501. Our

general policy is to forward, and not to intentionally screen, any mail received at our corporate office. The Board of Directors reserves the right to revise this policy in the event it is abused, becomes unworkable or otherwise does not efficiently serve the policy’s purpose.

 

 

Codes of Ethics

 

The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. The Board of Directors also has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy that applies to all officers, other associates and directors. Links to both codes of

ethics are on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website at: http://www.iberiabank.com. Any waiver or substantial amendments of the codes of ethics applicable to our directors and executive officers also will be disclosed on our website.

 

 

Preferred Stock Issuance Representation

 

The Board of Directors represents that it will not, without prior shareholder approval, issue any series of preferred stock for any defensive or anti-takeover purpose, for the purpose of implementing any shareholder rights plan or with features specifically intended to make any attempted acquisition of the Company more difficult or costly. Subject to these limitations, the Board of Directors may issue preferred stock in connection with capital

raising transactions, acquisitions, and joint ventures and for other corporate purposes that may have the effect of making such an acquisition more difficult or costly, as could also be the case if the Board of Directors were to issue additional shares of common stock. This representation is part of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a link to which is in the “Investor Relations” portion of our website at: http://www.iberiabank.com.

 

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

The Board of Directors has adopted written Corporate Governance Guidelines, which outline the Board’s responsibilities and duties to our shareholders, associates and clients, and to the communities in which we do business, to ensure that we operate with the highest professional, ethical, legal and socially responsible standards. The Guidelines address a number of matters relating to our directors, including Board composition and qualifications, functions of the Board and committees of the Board.

 

The Guidelines also address the following matters of corporate governance:

 

  No director of our Company may serve on more than three other public company boards. It is expected that each director will be available to attend substantially all meetings of the Board and any committees on which he or she will serve.
 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     17  


Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

 

  Directors are required to submit a letter of resignation to the Board upon a job change. There should be an opportunity for the Board through the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to review the appropriateness of Board membership under the circumstances.

 

  Employee directors should offer to resign from the Board upon their resignation, removal or retirement as an officer of the Company.

 

  Specific Company stock ownership guidelines for directors, vice chairmen and senior executive vice presidents (which include all Named Executive Officers) have been established and can be found as a part of the IBERIABANK Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines. A link to the Corporate Governance Guidelines is on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, at: http://www.iberiabank.com. The stock ownership guidelines for Named Executive Officers are described in this Proxy Statement under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines.” Adoption of these guidelines was intended to ensure that the interests of
   

directors and senior executive officers are aligned with the interests of our shareholders.

 

  The Company supports and encourages directors’ periodic participation in continuing education programs to assist them in performing their corporate governance responsibilities.

 

  In an uncontested election of directors, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “WITHHOLD” from his or her election than votes “FOR” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification by the Secretary of the shareholder vote. The Nominating and Governance Committee would then consider the resignation and make a recommendation to our Board as to the action to be taken. This guideline does not apply in contested elections. For more information about this policy, see “Proposal I—Election of Directors—Majority Voting for Directors; Director Resignation Policy.”

A link to the Corporate Governance Guidelines is on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website at: http://www.iberiabank.com.

 

 

18   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following tables include, as of the record date, March 21, 2017 (except as otherwise specified), certain information as to the common stock beneficially owned by:

 

  persons or entities, including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, who or which was known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;

 

  our directors;

 

  our Named Executive Officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table elsewhere herein; and

 

  all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

 

       Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of December 31, 2016  
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner                                               Amount        Percentage  

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(1)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355

       3,586,656          8.09

BlackRock, Inc.(2)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055

       3,026,963          6.80

Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP(3)
Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746

       2,961,379          6.69

 

(1)  As reported on Schedule 13G/A, dated as of February 9, 2017, and filed with the SEC on February 10, 2017, The Vanguard Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, has sole voting power with respect to 52,808 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,531,931 shares, shared voting power with respect to 3,976 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 54,725 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australian, LTD, each a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, are the beneficial owners of 50,749 shares and 6,035 shares, respectively, as a result of serving as investment managers of collective trust accounts and Australian investment offerings, respectively.

 

(2)  As reported on Schedule 13G/A, dated as of January 24, 2017 and filed with the SEC on January 25, 2017, BlackRock, Inc., a Delaware corporation, has sole voting power with respect to 2,935,758 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,026,963 shares.

 

(3)  As reported on Schedule 13G, dated as of February 9, 2017, and filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017, Dimensional Fund Advisors, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, has sole voting power with respect to 2,909,524 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,961,379 shares.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     19  


Table of Contents

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

 

       Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of Record Date (1)(2)(3)(4)  
                                                 Amount        Percentage  

Directors:

         

Elaine D. Abell

       55,707 (5)         *  

Harry V. Barton, Jr.

       35,161 (6)         *  

Ernest P. Breaux, Jr.

       31,763          *  

Daryl G. Byrd

       372,875 (5)(7)         *  

John N. Casbon

       13,723          *  

Angus R. Cooper, II

       44,400          *  

William H. Fenstermaker

       64,490 (5)(8)         *  

John E. Koerner, III

       8,900 (9)         *  

Rick E. Maples

       1,200          *  

E. Stewart Shea, III

       85,245 (5)(10)         *  

David H. Welch

       11,676          *  

Named Executive Officers who are not directors:

         

Anthony J. Restel

       88,455 (7)         *  

Michael J. Brown

       174,560 (7)         *  

John R. Davis

       90,780 (7)         *  

Jefferson G. Parker

       76,686          *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)

       1,292,547          2.52

 

* Represents less than 1% of the outstanding common stock.

 

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, shares are held with sole voting and dispositive power.

 

(2) Includes shares of common stock owned directly by directors and executive officers, as well as shares held by their spouses, minor children, companies and trusts of which they are trustees. Also includes shares held under a power of attorney.

 

(3) Includes all shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of stock options, including those vesting within 60 days of the record date: 158,129 shares by Mr. Byrd; 44,822 shares by Mr. Restel; 60,857 shares by Mr. Brown; 28,183 shares by Mr. Davis; 47,713 shares by Mr. Parker; and 401,463 shares by all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

(4) Includes unvested restricted shares that may be voted by the following persons: 25,859 shares by Mr. Byrd; 6,758 shares by Mr. Restel; 8,838 shares by Mr. Brown; 6,254 shares by Mr. Davis; 7,651 shares by Mr. Parker; and 88,779 shares by all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

(5) Includes the following shares of common stock pledged as security for loans from unaffiliated parties: Mr. Byrd-148,619 shares; Ms. Abell-11,259 shares; Mr. Fenstermaker—20,086 shares and Mr. Shea-11,979 shares.

 

(6) Includes 3,990 shares held by a trust of which Mr. Barton is a trustee.

 

(7)  Includes the following shares of common stock allocated to participants in the Retirement Savings Plan as of March 21, 2017: Mr. Byrd-12,311 shares; Mr. Restel-3,328 shares; Mr. Brown-4,125; Mr. Davis-2,482 shares; and all executive officers as a group 22,267 shares.

 

(8) Includes 20,000 shares held by C.H. Fenstermaker and Associates, LLC and 2,448 shares held by the William Fenstermaker Children’s Trust.

 

(9) Includes 3,500 shares held by Koerner Capital, LLC.

 

(10)  Includes 66,669 shares held through the E. Stewart Shea III Delaware Trust and the E. Stewart Shea III Family LLC; as Managing Member of the LLC Mr. Shea exercises voting and dispositive authority of those shares and 4,147 shares held by Barbara B. Shea.

 

20   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

 

In addition to beneficial ownership of common stock, some of our executive officers hold shares of “phantom stock” that are not reported in the stock ownership table but represent additional financial interests that are subject to the same market risks as common stock. The value of these phantom shares is the same as the value of the corresponding number of shares of common stock. As of the record date, executive officers named in the stock ownership table hold a pecuniary interest in the following number of shares of phantom stock: 3,639 shares by Mr. Byrd; 1,097 shares by Mr. Restel; 1,423 shares by Mr. Brown; 1,097 shares by Mr. Davis; 1,504 shares by Mr. Parker; and 13,717 shares by all executive officers as a group.

Also not included in the beneficial ownership of common stock reported above are the restricted share units and/or performance units held by our executive officers

that were granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The value of these units is the same as the value of the corresponding number of shares of common stock and is subject to the same market risks as common stock. These units are more completely described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” As of the record date, executive officers named in the stock ownership table hold the following restricted stock units: 51,872 units by Mr. Byrd; 13,322 units by Mr. Restel; 17,389 units by Mr. Brown; 12,114 units by Mr. Davis; 12,755 units by Mr. Parker; and 146,235 units held by all executive officers as a group, and the following number of performance units: 1,761 units by Mr. Byrd; 455 units by Mr. Restel; 613 units by Mr. Brown; 427 units by Mr. Davis; 450 units by Mr. Parker; and 5,061 units held by all executive officers as a group.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     21  


Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requires each of our directors and executive officers, and each beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock, to file with the SEC an initial report on Form 3 of the person’s beneficial ownership of our equity securities and subsequent reports on Form 4 regarding changes in ownership. On the basis of reports and representation of our directors, executive officers and greater than 10%

shareholders, we believe that each person subject to the filing requirements with respect to us satisfied all required filing requirements during 2016. In early 2017, H. Spurgeon Mackie Jr., an executive officer of the Company, became aware of his failure to file a Form 4 to report one sale of common stock in 2015. Upon recognition of his inadvertent failure to report the sale of securities, in 2017 Mr. Mackie filed a Form 5 to report the late transaction.

 

 

22   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

The Board of Directors of the Company has established six committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Board Risk Committee, the Executive Committee and the Investment Committee.

A link to the charter of each of these committees, except for the Executive Committee and the Investment Committee, can be found on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, at http://www.iberiabank.com.

 

 

Audit Committee

 

The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Barton, who serves as the chairman, and Messrs. Koerner and Maples and Ms. Abell. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the Audit Committee members has the requisite expertise generally required of an audit committee member under NASDAQ standards and that the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Mr. Barton, is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K.

The Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for the quality and integrity of our financial statements. The Audit Committee meets privately with the independent registered public accounting firm, has the sole authority to retain and dismiss the independent registered public accounting firm and reviews their performance and independence from management. The independent registered public accounting firm has unrestricted access and reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee met nine times during 2016.

The primary functions of the Audit Committee are to oversee: (i) the audit of the financial statements of the Company provided to the SEC, the shareholders and the general public; (ii) the Company’s internal financial and accounting processes; and (iii) the internal audit process. Additionally, the Audit Committee has responsibilities with respect to: (i) complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; (ii) authority to engage advisors; and (iii) funding as determined by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also monitors our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy concerning approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm. The policy requires that all services to be

provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided by Ernst & Young LLP during 2016. The Audit Committee will also pre-approve 2017 services to be provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

Pursuant to its Charter, the Audit Committee is authorized to conduct an appropriate review of all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations to determine that the related party transaction is consistent with the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. The term “related party transaction” generally means a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of the same) in which we or our subsidiaries are or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which the related party has or will have a direct or indirect interest. A related party generally means a director, nominee or executive officer of the Company; a person known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; and any “immediate family member” of the foregoing persons (as defined by the SEC). See “—Committee Interaction.”

While it is the responsibility of management and the Board Risk Committee to assess, manage and monitor the Company’s enterprise-wide exposure to risk, the Audit Committee will review in a general manner the guidelines and policies to govern the processes used by the Board Risk Committee and the management-level risk committee with respect to enterprise-wide risk management. See “—Committee Interaction.”

These and other aspects of the Audit Committee’s authority are more particularly described in the Audit Committee Charter. A link to the Audit Committee Charter is on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, at: http://www.iberiabank.com.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     23  


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

The independent members of the Board of Directors—Ms. Abell and Messrs. Barton, Breaux, Casbon, Cooper, Fenstermaker, Koerner, Maples, Shea and Welch—serve as our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending individuals for election or re-election to the Board of Directors, including those recommendations submitted by shareholders, the evaluation of the performance of the Board of Directors and its committees, and the evaluation and recommendation of corporate governance policies. In 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held seven meetings. A link to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter is on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, at: http://www.iberiabank.com.

It is a policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that candidates for director possess the highest personal and professional integrity, have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and have skills and expertise appropriate for us and serving the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees is as follows:

 

  In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to IBERIABANK Corporation during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any related party transactions with us during the applicable time period; and

 

  In the case of new director candidates, the Committee first conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board of Directors.

Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to nominate candidates with diverse experiences and perspectives. In evaluating candidates, the Committee considers, among other things, diverse backgrounds, professional experience, education and community involvement, as well as racial and gender diversity. The Committee has not formalized this practice into a written policy.

The Committee meets to discuss and consider these candidates’ qualifications, including whether the nominee is independent within the meaning of NASDAQ listing standards, and then selects a candidate by majority vote. In seeking potential nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses its management’s network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. To date, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not paid a fee to any third party to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating director candidates, nor has the Committee rejected a timely director nominee from a shareholder holding more than 5% of our voting stock.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders, provided the shareholders follow the procedures set forth in Article 6F of our Articles of Incorporation. The Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the criteria set forth above, based on whether the candidate was recommended by a shareholder or otherwise.

Article 6F of our Articles of Incorporation governs nominations of candidates for election as director at any annual meeting of shareholders and provides that such nominations, other than those made by the Board, may be made by any shareholder entitled to vote at such meeting, if the nomination is made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article 6F, which are summarized below.

A shareholder’s notice of nomination must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive offices not later than 60 days before the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of shareholders and must set forth as to each person who the shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director and as to the shareholder giving the notice:

 

  The name, age, business address and residence address of such person;

 

  The principal occupation or employment of such person;

 

  The class and number of shares of our stock which are Beneficially Owned (as defined in Article 9A(e) of the Articles of Incorporation) by such person on the date of such shareholder notice; and
 

 

24   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

 

  Any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies with respect to nominees for election as directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and as to the shareholder giving the notice:

 

    The name and address, as they appear on our books, of such shareholder and any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be supporting such nominees; and

 

    The class and number of shares of our stock which are Beneficially Owned by such shareholder on the date of such shareholder notice and, to the extent known, by any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be supporting such nominees on the date of such shareholder notice.

 

To be timely under the Articles of Incorporation, nominations by any shareholder eligible to vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must have been received by us on or before March 5, 2017.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may reject any nomination by a shareholder not made in accordance with the requirements of Article 6F. Notwithstanding the foregoing procedures, if neither the Board of Directors nor the Committee makes a determination as to the validity of any nominations by a shareholder, the presiding officer of the annual meeting shall determine and declare at the annual meeting whether the nomination was made in accordance with the terms of Article 6F.

 

 

Compensation Committee

 

Our Compensation Committee has four members and is chaired by Mr. Shea; the other members of the Committee are Messrs. Maples, Fenstermaker and Casbon. Each member of the Compensation Committee has been determined by our Board of Directors to meet NASDAQ, SEC and Internal Revenue Code independence criteria. The Compensation Committee met seven times during 2016.

Compensation Committee Responsibilities and Authority. Our Compensation Committee, in consultation with our President and Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for establishing and monitoring the overall compensation and benefits philosophy and strategy of IBERIABANK Corporation and its subsidiaries. As set forth in its Charter, the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include:

 

  Evaluating the performance of the CEO and establishing compensation awards for the CEO;

 

  Monitoring and reviewing performance measures and any applicable goals for measuring corporate performance, in consultation with the CEO;

 

  Reviewing and approving the design of compensation programs for key executives; and

 

  Providing oversight of our general compensation programs and policies.

The Compensation Committee determines the compensation for the CEO. With respect to our other senior executive officers, the CEO annually reviews performance and presents his conclusions and compensation recommendations to the Compensation

Committee. The Committee reviews and considers the CEO’s recommendations when making its final compensation decisions for all executives other than the CEO. The Compensation Committee also administers our equity incentive programs and oversees risk management with respect to our material incentive compensation arrangements. In addition, the Compensation Committee recommends to the full Board compensation for directors.

The Chair of the Compensation Committee works with the Director of Human Resources to set the meeting agenda for the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Committee Charter. The Charter of the Compensation Committee describes the principles upon which the Committee was founded and operates. The Charter is reviewed and reassessed annually, and any proposed changes are recommended to the Board, to ensure that the Compensation Committee is fulfilling its duties in aligning our executive compensation programs with shareholder value creation, helping us attract and retain talented executives and managers, and being responsive to the legitimate needs of our shareholders. A current copy of the Charter of the Compensation Committee can be found on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, at http://www.iberiabank.com.

Involvement of Compensation Consultants and Executive Management in Compensation Decisions. Among other matters, the Compensation Committee is authorized to engage outside advisors (including compensation consultants and legal counsel) to assist the Committee in achieving its mission and responsibilities. In 2016, the Committee retained FW Cook to serve as the

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     25  


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

Committee’s independent advisor. The decision to retain independent advisors is at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and these consultants work at the direction of the Committee. The Committee assessed the independence of FW Cook, taking into account related factors in accordance with SEC and NASDAQ rules and concluded that the work of FW Cook did not raise any conflict of interest that would prevent them from independently advising the Committee. The Committee has also retained FW Cook to serve as the Committee’s independent advisor for 2017.

The Compensation Committee believes that it is important for members of management to provide input on the overall effectiveness of our executive compensation programs. The Committee believes that the advice of outside advisors must be combined with the input of senior management and the Compensation Committee’s own individual experiences and best judgment to seek to achieve a proper alignment of compensation philosophies, programs and practices. The CEO, the Senior Executive Vice President of Communications, Human Resources and Facilities and the Director of Human Resources are the members of management who interact most closely with the Compensation Committee. These individuals work with the Compensation Committee to provide their perspectives on reward strategies and how to align them with our business and retention goals. They provide feedback and insights into how well our compensation programs and practices appear to be working. In addition, the CEO, the Director of Human Resources and the Chief Financial Officer attend all or portions of certain Compensation Committee meetings to participate in the presentation of materials and discussion of management’s point of view regarding compensation issues.

 

Executive Session. At certain meetings, the Compensation Committee meets in executive session without members of management present for the purpose of discussing matters independently from management.

Compensation Risk. The Compensation Committee reviewed the relationship between our risk management and the incentive compensation provided to associates, including our Named Executive Officers and other executive and non-executive officers, and determined that our incentive compensation programs do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk taking. These conclusions were made after consultations with senior executive officers, the Director of Human Resources, the chairman of the Board Risk Committee (who is also a member of the Compensation Committee), and representatives of the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation advisor. See “—Committee Interaction.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors. During 2016, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was an officer or other associate of our Company or any of our subsidiaries during 2016, or is a former officer or other associate of our Company or any of our subsidiaries. Members of the Compensation Committee may, from time to time, have banking relationships in the ordinary course of business with IBERIABANK, as described under “Certain Transactions.”

 

 

Board Risk Committee

 

The Board Risk Committee is a standing committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. The purpose of the Board Risk Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Company’s enterprise risk management framework, risk appetite, risk exposure, risk governance, and significant policies. The members of the Board Risk Committee are Mr. Casbon, who serves as Chairman, and Messrs. Breaux, Cooper, Koerner, Maples, Shea and Welch. The Board Risk Committee met seven times in 2016.

The primary purpose of the Board Risk Committee is to:

 

  Monitor and review the enterprise risk management framework and risk management processes of the Company, including the Company’s credit, operational, market, liquidity, legal, regulatory/compliance, and strategic/reputational risks;

 

  Annually review and recommend to the Board for approval the Risk Appetite Statement and ensure management operates in alignment with the stated goals, objectives, and metrics;

 

  Ensure that management establishes and supports an appropriate risk culture; and
 

 

26   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

  Monitor risk management strategies and provide recommendations to the Board in order to effectively manage risk.

The Board Risk Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities include:

 

  Annually review and approve significant risk management policies of the bank, including the credit policy;

 

  Review summary results and reports of the Company’s self-risk identification and assessment program. Review and discuss all key and emerging risks, along with management’s planned course of action for addressing such risks. Review other risks identified and deemed appropriate by the Chief Risk Officer;

 

  Review summary reports regarding the Company’s risk appetite and associated metrics and tolerances;

 

  Review the annual plan for the Company’s Loan Review program and receive regular Loan Review reports from the Director of Loan Review;

 

  Review all decisions of the Management Risk Committee identified by the Chief Risk Officer as having potentially significant impact on the Company;

 

  Periodically review regulatory findings and monitor management activities related to regulatory matters;

 

  Annually review and assess the performance of the Chief Risk Officer, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer;

 

  Regularly review information from the Chief Risk Officer and others as required by the Chief Risk Officer or the Board Risk Committee to discuss matters related to the management of credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, regulatory/compliance risk, legal risk, and reputational/strategic risk as appropriate; and
  Periodically report to the Board on significant results of the foregoing activities as they relate to the Company.

The Board Risk Committee has authority to conduct any investigation appropriate to fulfilling its responsibilities, and it has direct access to all persons in the organization. The Board Risk Committee may retain, at the Company’s expense, such special consultants and experts as it deems necessary or appropriate to execute its duties.

At certain meetings, the Board Risk Committee meets without members of management present for the purpose of discussing matters independently from management. The Board Risk Committee meets privately at various times through the year with the Chief Risk Officer and such other officers as the Board Risk Committee deems appropriate to discuss any matters that the Board Risk Committee believes should be discussed.

The function of the Board Risk Committee is solely oversight; management is responsible for executing the Company’s risk management and credit origination processes. Each Board Risk Committee member is entitled to rely on persons and organizations within and outside the Company that provide information and advice to management and the Board Risk Committee and on the accuracy and completeness of this information and advice absent actual knowledge to the contrary.

The Board Risk Committee conducts its business pursuant to a written Board Risk Committee Charter adopted and reviewed at least annually by the Board of Directors. A link to the Board Risk Committee Charter can be found on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website, at http://www.iberiabank.com.

 

 

Committee Interaction

 

In connection with the responsibilities of the Board Risk Committee, with respect to the relationship between the Company’s risk management and the incentive compensation provided to associates, including Named Executive Officers identified in this Proxy Statement and other executive and non-executive officers, the Compensation Committee determines whether incentive compensation programs encourage unnecessary and excessive risk taking. The Compensation Committee will seek to limit any unnecessary or excessive risks that these programs may pose to the Company, in order to avoid programs that might encourage such risks. The Board of Directors recognizes that information and

reports prepared for and reviewed by the Compensation Committee and the Board Risk Committee may each be relevant to the oversight and responsibilities of the other, and should be provided to the other, as appropriate.

In connection with the responsibilities of the Audit Committee with respect to compensation risk assessment, the Board of Directors recognizes that information and reports prepared for and reviewed by each of the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Board Risk Committee may be relevant to the oversight and responsibilities of the other committees, and should be provided to the other committees, as appropriate.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     27  


Table of Contents

Proposal II—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to shareholder ratification, currently intends to appoint the firm of Ernst & Young LLP, independent certified public accountants, to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm and to perform the audit of the financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and further directed that the selection of auditors be submitted for ratification by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate shareholder questions.

Shareholder ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by our Bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to the shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. In the event shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider this appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our and our shareholders’ best interests.

 

 

Audit Fees and Other Matters

 

Ernst & Young LLP provided audit services to us consisting of the annual audit of our 2016 and 2015 consolidated financial statements contained in our

Annual Reports on Form 10-K and reviewed the financial statements contained in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for 2016 and 2015.

 

 

The following table discloses the aggregate fees for professional services performed by Ernst & Young LLP in fiscal years 2016 and 2015.

 

Fee Category      Fiscal Year 2016        % of Total        Fiscal Year 2015        % of Total  

Audit Fees(1)

     $ 2,402,576          82.6      $ 2,324,084          91.6

Audit-related Fees(1)

       40,000          1.4        65,000          2.6

Tax Fees

       251,504          8.6        145,011          5.7

All Other Fees(1)

       214,116          7.4        1,995          0.1

Total Fees

     $ 2,908,196          100      $ 2,536,090          100
(1)  Fees include reimbursement of expenses incurred.

 

Audit Fees—These are fees related to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, reviews of the financial statements included in each of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, comfort letters and consents, and accounting consultations that related to the audited financial statements and were necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards.

Audit-related Fees—These fees consist primarily of other audits and attest services, financial accounting, reporting and compliance matters.

Tax Fees—These are fees billed for professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including services provided in connection with assistance in the preparation and filing of tax returns.

All Other Fees—These are fees for all other permissible services that do not meet the above category descriptions.

 

 

28   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proposal II—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Pre-approval Policy

 

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or

category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee or the Chairman of the Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COMPANY’S SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     29  


Table of Contents

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is composed of four non-employee directors. The Board has made a determination that the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the listing standards of NASDAQ as to independence, financial literacy and experience. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Charter of the Audit Committee, as adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. This is a report on the Committee’s activities relating to fiscal year 2016.

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2016 with the Company’s management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, underlying estimates and significant judgments used in the financial statements. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements with the independent registered public accounting firm, who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those statements with generally accepted accounting principles, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114, “The Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance”, as currently in effect.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by Rule 3526, “Communication with Audit Committee Concerning Independence”, of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as currently in effect, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

The Audit Committee also considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. In assessing requests for services by the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers whether the independent registered public accounting firm is likely to provide the most effective and efficient services based upon their familiarity with the Company and whether the services could enhance the Company’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee met with the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audits, their evaluations of the Company’s systems of internal controls and the overall quality and adequacy of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. Both the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held 9 meetings during fiscal year 2016.

The Audit Committee received reports throughout the year on the Company’s internal controls for compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated there under. The Audit Committee will continue to obtain updates by management on the process and has reviewed management’s and the independent registered auditors’ evaluation of the Company’s system of internal controls included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

 

30   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Report of the Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee, or its Chairman, met with, or held telephonic discussions with, the independent registered public accounting firm and management prior to the release of the Company’s quarterly and annual financial information or the filing of any such information with the SEC. In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee also recommended that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, for filing with the SEC. Subject to shareholder ratification, the Audit Committee currently intends to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE:

        Harry V. Barton, Jr., Chairman

        Elaine D. Abell

        John E. Koerner, III

        Rick E. Maples

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     31  


Table of Contents

Proposal III—Approval of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we provide you the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

As described in detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” we seek to closely align the interest of our Named Executive Officers with yours. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our Named Executive Officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term goals, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. We believe the program changes coupled with below target payouts for 2016 demonstrate the Committee’s continuing commitment to strengthen the alignment between compensation outcomes and the shareholder experience.

We urge you to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and other related executive compensation disclosures so that you have an understanding of our

executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices.

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, rather the vote relates to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in this Proxy Statement. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is non-binding on the Company, our Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee.

The Company’s management will present the following resolution to the meeting:

RESOLVED, That the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures.”

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE COMPANY’S SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

32   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

References to “the Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis means IBERIABANK Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section explains the 2016 compensation program for the Company’s Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, whose compensation information is provided in the tables following this discussion, and how those decisions reflect the achievements of the Company’s 2016 performance and strategic objectives. The Company’s 2016 NEOs are listed below:

 

Daryl G. Byrd

  

President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

Anthony J. Restel

  

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Michael J. Brown

  

Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer

John R. Davis

   Senior Executive Vice President-Mergers and Acquisitions, Investor Relations, and Director of Financial Strategy

Jefferson G. Parker

  

Vice Chairman and Managing Director of Brokerage, Trust and Wealth Management

Executive Summary

The Company’s executive compensation programs have evolved over the past several years culminating in significant changes for 2016 reflective of shareholder feedback. The Company’s executive compensation programs are designed to encourage our executives to execute on the Company’s short-term financial goals but to also align our executive’s interests with those of our shareholders. Specific details on the compensation changes made in 2016 are described in greater detail on the following pages, but before highlighting these changes, we thought it would be helpful to describe the Company’s recent business performance and demonstrate the linkage between 2016 performance and pay outcomes.

Business Highlights

We are pleased to share with you some of our significant accomplishments in 2016:

 

  Returned $58.9 million, or 33%, of net income available to common shareholders through dividends.

 

  Increased tangible book value per common share by 14% to $45.80.

 

  Generated a 17% annual increase in diluted earnings per common share to $4.30.

 

  Increased net income 31% to $186.8 million and increased net income available to common shareholders 25% to $178.8 million.

 

  Increased average total loans by $1.4 billion, or 10%, to $14.7 billion.

 

  Achieved record average deposits of $16.2 billion, with a $1.1 billion, or 7%, increase over 2015.

 

  Grew average non-interest-bearing deposits by $585.7 million, or 15%.

 

  Net interest income increased 10% to $649.2 million.

 

  Non-interest income increased 6% to $233.8 million.

 

  Non-interest expense decreased 1% to $566.7 million.

 

  Efficiency ratio improved 640 basis points to 64.2%.

 

  Issued non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, raising $55.3 million in net proceeds, and issued approximately 3.6 million shares of common stock, resulting in net proceeds of $279.2 million, further strengthening our capital position.

 

  Maintained a tangible common equity ratio of 9.82%.

 

  Experienced a 40% positive total shareholder return ratio (TSR) for the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, which includes share price appreciation and dividends paid on our common stock.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     33  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

2016 Relative Performance Snapshot

For purposes of these charts, peer average is the average of the relevant metric for the Company’s peer group. The peer group is listed in the “Competitive Benchmarking” section of this CD&A.

 

LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

 

LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

Source: SNL Financial LC

Executive Compensation Program Changes

In response to the shareholder advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs (commonly known as “Say-on-Pay”) at our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at which 69% of the common shares voted approved our executive compensation program, we engaged in a holistic review of our executive compensation program, including continued discussions with major shareholders.

 

34   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

As a result of this review process, significant changes were made to the executive compensation program in 2016. A summary of key changes include:

 

Desired

Principle/
Outcome

   Key Changes
Alignment between performance results and executive pay   

Overall Compensation Levels:

    2016 annual incentive payouts were 87.28% of target for our NEOs, demonstrating alignment between the Company performance results and executive pay outcomes

 

    2016 target compensation levels, including base salaries and annual and long-term incentive targets, were held flat

 

Improve transparency and strengthen alignment with financial results and annual incentive award payouts   

Annual Incentives:

     Additional progress was made around performance metric selection, design clarity and goal setting.

 

*     Three performance goals were selected to align incentives with key financial measures.

 

•    One earnings measure constitutes 50% weight while two credit measures comprise the remaining 50% of the annual incentive opportunity. These metrics were chosen to balance the need to measure profitable growth with credit quality.

 

•    In the first quarter of 2016, the Committee approved a specific performance range for each measure, including Threshold, Target and Maximum performance goals.

 

  2015       2016  
  Performance Measure       Weight       Performance Measure       Weight  
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 
  Core Earnings     30%       Core Earnings     50%  
  Balance Sheet Growth (Avg Assets)     10%       Balance Sheet Growth (Avg Assets)     -  
  Core Return on Tangible Common Equity     30%       Core Return on Tangible Common Equity     -  
  Annual Net Charge-Offs to Average Loans     15%       Annual Net Charge-Offs to Average Loans     25%  
  Legacy Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets     15%       Legacy Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets     25%  
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adopt more long-term focused performance metrics to encourage long-term value creation

 

 

Long-Term Incentives (“LTI”):

       LTI was allocated between three vehicles with the greatest weight on long-term, performance based incentives:

 

*     Performance-Based Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) weighting was 60%;

 

*     Stock option weighting was 10%; and

 

*     Restricted stock weighting was 30%.

 

  2015       2016  
  LTI Vehicle       Weight       LTI Vehicle       Weight  
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 
  Performance-based RSUs     20%       Performance-based RSUs     60%  
  Performance Units     20%       -     -  
  Stock Options     15%       Stock Options     10%  
  Restricted Stock     45%       Restricted Stock     30%  
 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     35  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

The table below demonstrates the Company’s strong commitment to ensuring long-term compensation opportunities for senior executives, including NEOs, are aligned with long-term performance and shareholder interests.

 

Long-Term Incentive Structure - Equity Mix  
Equity Type    2013     2014     2015     2016  

 

 
Performance-based RSUs      0     20     20     60
Performance Units      0     20     20     0
Restricted Stock      90     45     45     30
Stock Options      10     15     15     10

 

LOGO                         

 

Align financial interests between NEOs and shareholders  

Stock Ownership:

       For 2016, the CEO’s stock ownership requirement was increased to 5x his base salary.

 

       Other NEOs have had their stock ownership requirements increased to 3x base salary.

 

       All NEOs, including the CEO, are currently in compliance with the new stock ownership requirements.

 

The significant changes made to our executive compensation programs in 2016 were well received by our shareholders as evidenced by overwhelming support of our 2016 Say-on-Pay vote (91% favorable support). Our Compensation Committee believes that these voting results reflect our shareholder’s endorsement of the recent structural changes made to, and the current direction of, our executive compensation program, and affirm alignment of our program with shareholder interests. We continue to maintain an open and active dialogue with our shareholders to identify ways to further refine and improve our executive compensation program, and the Committee believes our current program adequately and effectively addresses shareholder concerns, promotes the Company’s business strategy and aligns pay with performance and shareholder value.

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

WHAT WE DO

 

Use of performance based equity 60% of the LTI awards are delivered via 3-year performance shares.

 

Meaningful stock ownership guidelines CEO = 5 times base salary and other NEOs = 3 times base salary.

 

We have compensation recovery (clawback) policies that pertain to our incentive plans.

 

We award certain incentive compensation intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

 

We retain an independent compensation consultant.

 

We have annual advisory votes on executive compensation.
Pay for performance: Clear financial goals were established during the first quarter of the year. Performance-based compensation constituted (74%) of the total target direct compensation for our CEO and (64%) for our NEOs in 2016.

 

Balance short-term and long-term incentives: Our short-term and long-term incentive programs have different performance goals, which incorporate not only financial measures to drive performance, but also shareholder value measures such as TSR and core ROTCE.

 

We maintain an Independent Compensation Committee (the Compensation Committee consists entirely of independent directors).

 

We regularly engage with shareholders through our shareholder outreach program.
 

 

36   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

WHAT WE DON’T DO

 

× We do not provide excise tax gross ups on new change-in-control agreements.

 

× We do not provide new Single Trigger change-in-control severance agreements.

 

× We do not allow hedging of Company stock.

 

× We do not allow executives or directors to pledge Company shares. Current pledges are grandfathered.

 

× We do not allow repricing of underwater stock options (including cash-outs).

 

× We do not provide excessive executive perquisites.

 

× We do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking as a result of our compensation policies.

 

× We do not base incentive compensation on a single performance metric.

 

× We do not have guaranteed minimum payouts.

 

× We do not pay dividend equivalents on stock options or unearned performance shares.
 

 

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PHILOSOPHY

Philosophy and Objectives of our Executive Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee’s general philosophy is that all elements of target compensation (e.g., base salary, target annual incentive award opportunity, and target long-term incentive award opportunity) should be based on competitive market data, with incentive compensation targeted at the median of similarly situated executives among our peer group or other relevant industry benchmarks. The competitive positioning of target compensation levels for individuals may vary above or below the median based on individual, executive-specific factors such as tenure, experience, and proficiency in role or criticality to the Company. The Compensation Committee’s objective is to provide a program that:

 

  Attracts and retains high performing executives;

 

  Has a significant portion of pay tied to business performance;

 

  Aligns compensation with shareholder interests while rewarding long-term value creation;

 

  Discourages excessive risk-taking by rewarding both short-term and long-term performance;

 

  Reinforces high ethical conduct; and

 

  Maintains flexibility to respond to industry dynamics.

Unlike target compensation levels, which are set by the Compensation Committee near the beginning of the year, actual compensation is a function of our operational, financial, and stock price performance, as reflected through annual incentive payouts and the value of all long-term incentive awards at vesting. Actual compensation is intended to vary above or below target levels commensurate with our performance.

Compensation Mix

Our strategy for compensating our NEOs and other associates has been based on programs that emphasize performance-based variable compensation. During 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the following incentive plan designs for our NEOs, which included:

 

  Annual Incentive Awards: a transparent and formulaic plan, rewarding achievement of profitable growth and credit quality.

 

  Long-Term Incentive Awards: granted three types of equity based awards that in combination balance alignment with shareholder interest (stock options), retention (restricted stock) and long-term performance accountability (performance shares).

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     37  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

The Company’s emphasis on performance-based compensation is best illustrated by the mix of 2016 compensation for NEOs which was as follows:

 

LOGO

This illustrates that the majority of our NEO’s total direct compensation package is variable pay. Furthermore, it also shows our emphasis on long-term incentive compensation over short-term (annual) incentive compensation.

DECISION MAKING PROCESS

Role of Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s compensation program for the President and CEO and other NEOs. The Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities are set forth in its charter and include, but are not limited to:

 

  Reviewing and approving the compensation for the President and CEO, and other executives;

 

  Selecting and approving the performance metrics and goals for all executive officer compensation programs and evaluating performance at the end of each performance period; and

 

  Approving annual incentive award and long-term incentive award opportunities.

In making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee uses multiple resources and tools, including the services of its independent compensation advisor.

Compensation Decisions for the Named Executive Officers

Individual compensation decisions (base salary adjustments and incentive awards) for all NEOs are based upon core performance, achievement of strategic initiatives and individual performance. The Committee, in its sole discretion, determines any salary adjustments and approves the annual and long-term incentive awards for the President and CEO.

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has retained FW Cook as its independent consultant reporting directly to the Compensation Committee.

In its role as the Committee’s independent advisor, FW Cook attends Committee meetings and advises on matters including compensation program design, competitive benchmarking and relative pay for performance. FW Cook also provides market data, analysis and advice regarding compensation of our NEOs and other executive officers. FW Cook does not provide any services to the Company other than executive compensation consulting services to the Committee.

Competitive Benchmarking

Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews competitive data for comparable executive positions in the market. External market data is used by the Compensation Committee as a point of reference in its executive pay decisions in conjunction with financial and individual performance data.

 

38   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

The Committee also considers analysis from a comprehensive total compensation study, which delineates each compensation element for NEOs, competitive benchmarking, and other analysis, as further described below.

 

Individual
Performance
                Company Performance           Intangibles
   NEO’s contributions to the development and execution of our business plans and strategies (including contributions that are expected to provide substantial benefit to the Company in future periods)        Overall financial performance of the Company, including balance sheet growth (assets), core return on tangible common equity, core earnings per share, credit related metrics and relative total shareholder return          Demonstrated commitment to the Company’s core values:
           

*

*

*

*

*

 

 

 

 

 

  

Leadership ability;

Teamwork;

Client focus;

Shareholder focus; and

Ability to attract, retain and develop talent.

   Performance of the NEO’s department or functional unit          
   Level of responsibility          

During 2016, the Compensation Committee worked with the Committee’s independent compensation consultants to review and define an appropriate peer group of publicly traded commercial bank holding companies. As a result of this review and selection process, the Committee removed one bank holding company, First Merit Corporation, which was acquired in 2016 and one bank holding company was added as a peer (Synovus Financial Corp.). The bank holding companies in the peer group were as follows:

 

Dollars in billions                   
Bank Holding Company    Total Assets
At 12/31/16
     Bank Holding Company    Total Assets
At 12/31/16
 

Associated Banc-Corp.

   $ 29.1      Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.    $ 22.3  

BancorpSouth, Inc.

   $ 14.7      Synovus Financial Corp.    $ 30.1  

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

   $ 25.6      Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.    $ 21.7  

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

   $ 30.2      Trustmark Corporation    $ 13.4  

F.N.B. Corporation

   $ 21.8      UMB Financial Corporation    $ 20.7  

First Horizon National Corporation

   $ 28.6      Umpqua Holding Corporation    $ 24.8  

Hancock Holding Company

   $ 24.0      United Bankshares, Inc.    $ 14.5  

Investors Bancorp, Inc.

   $ 23.2      Valley National Bancorp    $ 22.9  

MB Financial Inc.

   $ 19.3      Webster Financial Corporation    $ 26.1  

Old National Bancorp

   $ 14.9      Wintrust Financial Corporation    $ 25.7  
     

Peer Group Average

   $ 22.7  
     

IBERIABANK Corporation

   $ 21.7  

Source: SNL Financial LC

The Company’s period-end total assets were 4% less than the peer average at December 31, 2016.

In addition, the Compensation Committee reviewed compensation survey data for national commercial banking companies as provided by the independent compensation consultant. All of this national survey data was size-adjusted to reflect commercial banks with approximately $21 billion in assets, which was the approximate size of the Company at the time of the compensation review. This national industry perspective provides the Compensation Committee with both a broader view of the executive labor market and additional context from which to evaluate the competitiveness of the Company’s compensation program.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     39  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM ELEMENTS

The purpose and key characteristics of each element of our 2016 executive compensation program are summarized below:

 

Element    Purpose    Key Characteristics

Base Salary

   Represents each NEO’s base level of responsibility, leadership, tenure, qualifications, and contribution to the success and profitability of the Company and the competitive marketplace for executive talent specific to our industry.    Fixed compensation that is reviewed annually and adjusted if and when appropriate.

Annual Incentive Awards

   Motivates NEOs to achieve our short-term business objectives that drive long-term performance while providing flexibility to respond to opportunities and changing market conditions.    Variable performance-based annual cash award. Awards are based on achieving pre-established performance goals.

Performance-Based RSUs

   Motivates NEOs to achieve our business objectives by tying incentives to our financial and key operational metrics over the performance period while continuing to reinforce the link between the interests of our NEOs and our shareholders.    Variable performance-based long-term award. The ultimate number of units earned is based on the achievement of relative total shareholder return and core earnings per share performance goals over a three-year performance period.

Restricted Stock

   Motivates NEOs to achieve our business objectives by tying incentives to the performance of our common stock over the long-term; reinforces the link between the interests of our NEOs and our shareholders; motivates our NEOs to remain with the Company.    Long-term restricted stock award with a ratable vesting period over three years. The ultimate value realized varies with our common stock price.

Stock Options

   Motivates NEOs to achieve our business objectives by tying incentives to the appreciation of our common stock over the long term; reinforces the link between the interests of our NEOs and our shareholders.    Long-term option award with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and a ratable vesting period over three years; the ultimate value realized, if any, depends on the appreciation of our common stock price.

Other Compensation

   Provides benefits that promote employee health and work-life balance, which assists in attracting and retaining our NEOs.    Indirect compensation element consisting of health and welfare plans and minimal perquisites.
Post-Termination Compensation and Benefits    Agreements that attract and retain executives, promote continuity in management and promote equitable separations between the Company and its executives.    Indirect compensation elements related to employment contracts as well as Change in Control Severance Agreements.

 

40   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Base Salary

We view annual base salary as an important component of compensation for attracting and retaining executive talent. Annual base salaries serve as the foundation for our employee pay structure. Executive base salaries are set after considering factors including external market competitiveness, individual performance and internal equity. Prior to determining the base salary for each NEO, the Compensation Committee evaluates the results from the comprehensive total compensation study, along with competitive benchmarking discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

After reviewing the total compensation targets for our NEOs against market peers, the Compensation Committee decided not to increase 2016 base salaries and keep them consistent with 2015 levels.

The base salaries paid to each NEO in 2016 are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

Named Executive Officer    2015 Base Salary      2016 Base Salary      % Increase  

Daryl G. Byrd

   $ 1,095,150      $ 1,095,150        0%  

Anthony J. Restel

   $ 525,000      $ 525,000        0%  

Michael J. Brown

   $ 625,000      $ 625,000        0%  

John R. Davis

   $ 475,000      $ 475,000        0%  

Jefferson G. Parker

   $ 500,000      $ 500,000        0%  

Annual Incentive Awards

The annual incentive award program focuses executive officers on key core drivers of long-term success and strikes a balance between profitable growth and credit quality. The Compensation Committee approves specific targets for each performance metric and evaluates performance against these targets. All executive officers have a target award opportunity, as well as a maximum award, that may be paid under the annual incentive award program.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Compensation Committee established the target percentage of base salary for each of the NEOs. The Committee used the 2016 base salary in calculating the annual incentive award payments. The following chart shows the range of annual incentive award opportunities expressed as a percentage of base salary for the NEO. No changes were made to the NEO’s 2016 target annual incentive amounts.

 

     Target Bonus Opportunity  
Named Executive Officer    % of salary      $  

Daryl G. Byrd

     90%      $ 985,635  

Anthony J. Restel

     75%      $ 393,750  

Michael J. Brown

     75%      $ 468,750  

John R. Davis

     65%      $ 308,750  

Jefferson G. Parker

     75%      $ 375,000  

The following formula was used to calculate the payment that could be awarded to a NEO under the 2016 annual incentive award program:

Base Salary x Target Percentage of Base Salary x Total Weighted Performance Factor (0 - 200%)

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     41  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

For 2016, the Compensation Committee established the following metrics as the basis for the determination of payouts, if any, under the annual incentive plan. These financial metrics were selected to provide a holistic evaluation of Company performance with an emphasis on profitability, but not at the expense of growth or asset quality.

 

Metric    Weighting  

Core Earnings

     50%  

Annual Net Charge Offs to Average Loans

     25%  

Legacy Non-performing Assets/Total Assets

     25%  

Annual Incentive Results for 2016

 

LOGO

 

        Core
Earnings
2016*
       Annual
Net
Charge
Offs to
Average
Loans
       Legacy
Non-
Performing
Assets /
Total
Assets
       Annual
Incentive
Award **
 

Target

     $ 4.53          0.15%          0.50%       

Weighting

       50%          25%          25%       

        x

                   

Performance to Target ***

       95%          88%          71%       

Total Weighted Performance

       47%          22%          18%          87.28%  

 

* Excludes special items as detailed in IBERIABANK Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

** Annual Incentive Award capped at 200% of target for each.

 

*** Represents actual performance compared to a pre-determined range of acceptable outcomes approved by the Compensation Committee.

Based on the core performance of the Company relative to the targets established for 2016, our NEO Total Weighted Performance Factor was 87.28%. The Compensation Committee reviewed the overall performance of the Company and concluded that no qualitative adjustments were required and that the Total Weighted Performance Factor fairly captured core performance for 2016. Accordingly, the Total Weighted Performance Factor used for the annual incentive payout was set at 87.28%, a level below the targeted payout factor of 100%. The Compensation Committee

 

42   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

believes these incentive payments are aligned with the Company’s philosophy, market-based compensation practices, and the contribution of each NEO.

Annual Incentive Payment Calculation for 2016

 

Named Executive Officer   

2016

Annual

Incentive

Target

     Total
Weighted
Performance
Factor
  

2016

Annual

Incentive

Paid

 

Daryl G. Byrd

   $ 985,635      87.28%    $ 860,245  

Anthony J. Restel

   $ 393,750      87.28%    $ 343,658  

Michael J. Brown

   $ 468,750      87.28%    $ 409,117  

John R. Davis

   $ 308,750      87.28%    $ 269,472  

Jefferson G. Parker

   $ 375,000      87.28%    $ 327,293  

2016 Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Plan

As referenced in earlier sections of this CD&A, significant changes to the LTI program occurred in 2016 such that beginning in 2016, 60% of the annual LTI award value is allocated to Performance-based RSUs that have prospective three-year performance goals of core ROTCE and relative TSR. The allocation of LTI value to stock options and restricted stock has been significantly reduced from 2015. The chart below further outlines the mix and target weighting of the LTI awards for 2016.

 

Type of LTI    Vesting Time Frame    Performance Metric    Percent of Total
LTI Award Value
 

Performance-based RSUs

   3 Years - cliff vesting    Core ROTCE; Relative TSR      60

Stock Options

   3 Years - 33% per year    None      10

Restricted Stock

   3 Years - 33% per year    None      30

We consider long-term equity-based compensation to be critical to the alignment of executive compensation with shareholder value creation. Therefore, a market competitive, long-term equity-based incentive component is an integral part of our overall executive compensation program.

The total long-term incentive award in a given year is based on a multiple calculated as a percentage of base salary. The multiple is converted into an aggregate long-term incentive award. The following chart reflects the 2016 target award opportunities for each NEO:

 

     LTI Opportunity  
Named Executive Officer    % of salary     $  

Daryl G. Byrd

     200   $ 2,190,300  

Anthony J. Restel

     110   $ 577,500  

Michael J. Brown

     120   $ 750,000  

John R. Davis

     110   $ 522,500  

Jefferson G. Parker

     110   $ 550,000  

Target long-term incentive opportunities are established based on competitive market practices. The fair value of 2016 long-term incentive awards is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. In 2016, our long-term equity incentive program consisted of the following components:

 

 

Performance-based RSUs (60% of LTI award): During 2016, all NEOs received performance-based RSUs on February 18, 2016. These RSUs are awards that will be earned in shares based on meeting specified three-year

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     43  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

performance criteria. These RSUs are settled in shares at payout based on meeting core ROTCE and relative TSR performance goals. Relative TSR is measured against the KBW Regional Bank Index over a three year period. The Company must perform at the 50th percentile of the index in order to earn the target awards. If the Company meets or exceeds the 75th percentile relative TSR of the index and meets or exceeds the maximum ROTCE goal, participants can earn 250% of the target award. These RSUs are also eligible to receive dividends declared based on the percentage of goals achieved. Shares earned will be awarded on March 1, 2019.

 

  Stock Options (10% of LTI award): On February 18, 2016, our NEOs were granted stock options with an exercise price of $47.35, which was the closing market value for the common stock on the date of grant. Stock options reward NEOs for increasing the market price above the exercise price. We maintain a policy against repricing stock options without shareholder approval.

 

  Restricted Stock (30% of LTI award): Restricted shares are awarded subject to transfer and vesting restrictions. Restricted share awards are intended to build stock ownership and foster executive retention. All of the NEOs received restricted share awards on February 18, 2016. All of these restricted share awards have dividend and voting rights.

2014-2016 Performance-based RSUs

During 2014, the NEOs received performance-based RSUs that are earned in shares based on meeting three-year core EPS and relative TSR performance goals (relative to the KBW Regional Bank Index). The final payout percentage for these awards was 110.3% of the target grant, as illustrated in the table below:

 

Performance Goal    Core EPS      TSR Relative to KBW Regional Bank Index

Weight

     50%      50%

Threshold

   $ 3.75      Bottom Percentile Rank

Target

   $ 4.25      50th Percentile Rank

Maximum

   $ 4.75      100th Percentile Rank

Actual Performance

   $ 4.43      84.5th Percentile Rank

Payout %

     136%      85%

Final Weighted Payout %

      110.3%

On March 1, 2017, the NEO’s cliff vested in 110.3% of their performance-based RSU grant, settled in shares, for the 2014-2016 performance period.

Other Benefits and Limited Perquisites

We provide our NEOs with few perquisites, including club memberships, an annual physical examination, an automobile allowance and corporate aircraft flight benefits. We also provide our NEOs a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and individual long-term disability insurance coverage.

Acknowledging our expanded footprint and desire to achieve greater travel efficiencies, the Company acquired a corporate aircraft in 2014. Personal use of corporate aircraft is limited. However, any personal use will trigger imputed income to the NEO, calculated according to the IRS guidelines.

Personal use of the corporate aircraft is included under “Other Compensation” in the Summary Compensation Table.

In 2016, all trips taken by our CEO and other NEOs on corporate aircraft that were reported in the Summary Compensation Table as personal use amounted to less than $10,000.

Post Termination and Other Employment Arrangements

The Company provides benefits to our NEOs upon certain terminations of employment from the Company. These benefits are in addition to the benefits to which the executives would be entitled upon a termination of employment generally (i.e., vested retirement benefits accrued as of the date of termination, stock awards that have vested as of the date of termination and the right to elect continued health coverage pursuant to COBRA). The incremental benefits payable to the executives are described below.

 

44   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

The Company has a three-year employment agreement with our President and CEO, Daryl G. Byrd, that automatically renews for an additional year on each anniversary of the agreement unless not earlier than 90 days before the anniversary, the Company gives notice that it will not be renewed. The purpose of this employment agreement is to help retain Mr. Byrd and to define severance benefits for various types of employment terminations. In addition to change in control payments consistent with those of the other NEOs, Mr. Byrd’s employment agreement requires payment of compensation and/or benefits under various other termination of employment situations. Under the terms of this agreement, if Mr. Byrd’s employment is terminated for other than Cause (as defined), disability, retirement, or death, or if Mr. Byrd terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined), then he would be entitled to severance benefits. Under this termination, he would be entitled to cash severance payments equal to the greater of one year’s base salary or his base salary for the remaining term of the agreement.

In the event that Mr. Byrd’s employment is terminated for disability, we would provide continued medical insurance for his benefit and the benefit of his spouse and minor children for the remaining term of the agreement. In the event of Mr. Byrd’s death during the term of the agreement, the Company would continue to provide medical insurance for his spouse and minor children for the remaining term. Also, in the event of his death, Mr. Byrd’s spouse, estate, legal representative, or named beneficiaries would be entitled to receive his annual compensation (including base salary and any discretionary cash bonus the Compensation Committee would then deem appropriate) for 12 months from his date of death.

If Mr. Byrd’s employment is terminated by him within 30 days of a Change in Control (as defined), or within 90 days of an event constituting Good Reason occurring within three years of a Change of Control, or within 30 days of the first anniversary of a Change in Control, or if his employment is terminated by the Company without Cause within three years of a Change of Control, then he would be entitled to receive either the greater of his salary for the remaining term of the agreement, twice his salary, or the Internal Revenue Code Section 280G (“280G Maximum”) defined generally as 2.99 times his average compensation over the previous five years. If any payments to be made under the agreement are deemed to constitute “excess parachute payments” and, therefore, subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company would pay him the amount of the excise tax plus an amount equal to any additional federal, state, or local taxes that may result because of such additional payment. In addition to the cash severance benefits described, Mr. Byrd would be entitled to a continuation of benefits similar to those he was receiving at the time of such termination for the period otherwise remaining under the term of the agreement or until he obtains full-time employment with another employer, whichever occurs first. Additional details concerning these benefits can be found under the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” heading.

We have entered into Change in Control Severance Agreements with members of senior management, including each of our NEOs other than Mr. Byrd. The agreements provide for severance pay and benefits to the individuals upon voluntary resignation within 30 days after a Change in Control of IBERIABANK Corporation, as defined, or if within three years of a Change in Control the individual resigns for Good Reason, as defined, or is terminated by the Company or its successor without Just Cause, as defined. The severance payment is equal to 100% of each individual’s 280G Maximum. In addition, each will be entitled to continued medical and life insurance benefits at the Company’s expense for 39 months following termination of employment. We will also make the individual whole for any excise tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to any payments under the agreement. Each of these agreements was amended in 2008 to comply with the deferred compensation requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     45  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

OTHER COMPENSATION PROGRAM ASPECTS

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

We believe it is important for our NEOs and other senior executive officers to be significant shareholders so that their financial interests are aligned with our other shareholders. To foster executive stock ownership, we maintain executive stock ownership guidelines. We believe that these ownership guidelines as well as our total long-term incentive program have been effective in building an ownership culture. Thus, the financial interests of our executive leadership team are directly aligned with other shareholders. These ownership guidelines are stated as a multiple of base salary. NEOs have five years from the date the guideline applies to meet the target ownership level. The table below summarizes the share guidelines for NEOs expressed as a multiple of current base salary.

 

Named Executive Officer   

2016 Ownership Guideline

Multiple of Salary

 

Daryl G. Byrd

     5x Base Salary  

Anthony J. Restel

     3x Base Salary  

Michael J. Brown

     3x Base Salary  

John R. Davis

     3x Base Salary  

Jefferson G. Parker

     3x Base Salary  

Currently, all NEOs are in compliance with the required stock ownership guidelines.

The Stock Ownership Guidelines are part of the IBERIABANK Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines. A link to these guidelines is on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website at: http://www.iberiabank.com.

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee generally grants equity awards in February of each year. The Compensation Committee does not have any programs, plans, or practices of timing these awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information. We have never backdated, re-priced, or spring-loaded any of our equity awards.

Anti-Hedging Policy and Trading Restrictions

Our current policy limits the timing and types of transactions in our securities by “covered persons,” defined to include directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and members of their immediate families. Among other restrictions, the policy:

 

  Allows covered persons to trade Company securities only during window periods following earnings releases and, as to a “pre-approval group” of covered persons (generally, Section 16 filers), only after they have pre-cleared transactions;

 

  Prohibits covered persons from short-selling Company securities;

 

  Prohibits covered person transactions in puts, calls, or other derivative securities regarding the Company; and

 

  Prohibits covered persons from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions that involve Company securities.

Anti-Pledging Policy

In March 2016, the Board of Directors amended the Company’s insider trading policy to prohibit directors, executive officers and other persons subject to such policy, subsequent to the date of adoption, from holding shares in margin accounts or pledging shares as collateral for a loan. These restrictions will not apply to shares of Company common stock held in a margin account or pledged as collateral for a loan prior to the date of adoption of amendments to such policy. Under certain limited circumstances, an exception to the prohibition on pledged common stock may be granted.

 

46   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Compensation Recovery Policy

The Company maintains a written Compensation Recovery Policy. This policy applies to each of the NEOs and permits the recovery of incentive-based compensation paid to an officer if: (1) incentive-based compensation, bonuses, or equity awards were paid or vested during fiscal periods based on materially inaccurate financial statements, and (2) that officer engaged in fraud, willful misconduct, or a violation of Company policy that caused or otherwise contributed to the need for a material restatement of the Company’s financial results. The Board, considering the best interests of shareholders and the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has sole discretion to determine whether the applicable standard of conduct has been met and whether any such recovery should be pursued.

The Compensation Recovery Policy is part of the IBERIABANK Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines. A link to the Corporate Governance Guidelines is on the “Investor Relations” portion of our website at:

http://www.iberiabank.com.

Risk Management Considerations

The Compensation Committee reviews risks and rewards associated with our compensation programs, which include features that we believe mitigate risks without reducing incentives. Our compensation programs are intended to both encourage and reward prudent business judgment and appropriate long-term risk-taking. The Compensation Committee seeks to identify and remediate risk-taking incentives that may exist in these programs. The Chairman of the Board Risk Committee is also a member of the Compensation Committee.

Indemnification Agreements

The Company has indemnification agreements with Daryl G. Byrd and Michael J. Brown that provide for indemnification and advancement of expenses to the fullest extent permitted by law with respect to pending or threatened claims against them in their capacities as our officers. Following a Change in Control (as defined), all determinations regarding a right to indemnity and advancement of expenses are to be made by an independent legal counsel. In the event of a potential Change in Control, we must create a trust for the benefit of the indemnified executive officers, which upon a Change in Control may not be revoked or the principal thereof invaded without the indemnities’ written consent. While not requiring the maintenance of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, the indemnification agreements require that the indemnities be provided with maximum coverage if there is such insurance.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) limits to $1 million a public company’s annual tax deduction for compensation paid to certain highly compensated executive officers. Qualified performance-based compensation is excluded from this deduction limitation if certain requirements are met. The Committee’s policy is to structure compensation awards that will be deductible where doing so will further the purposes of our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee also considers it important to retain flexibility, to design compensation programs that recognize a full range of criteria important to our success, even where compensation payable under the programs may not be fully deductible. As such, the Compensation Committee may implement revised or additional compensation programs in the future as it deems necessary to appropriately compensate our executive team.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     47  


Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company is composed entirely of non-employee directors, each of whom has been determined in the Board’s business judgment to be independent. The Compensation Committee is responsible for oversight and review of the Company’s compensation and benefit plans.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis is management’s report on the Company’s compensation programs and, among other things, describes material elements of compensation paid to the President and Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with the management of the Company. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:

E. Stewart Shea, III, Chairman

William H. Fenstermaker

Rick E. Maples

John N. Casbon

 

48   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation earned or awarded for services rendered in all capacities by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and by its three other most highly compensated Named Executive Officers for the years indicated.

 

(a)   (b)     (c)      (d)      (e)      (f)      (g)      (h)  

Name and

Principal Position

  Year     Salary(1)     

Stock

Award(s)(3)

    

Option

Award(s)(3)

    

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation(2)

    

All Other

Compensation(4)

     Total  
Daryl G. Byrd     2016     $ 1,095,150      $ 1,971,275      $ 277,033      $ 860,245      $ 238,165      $ 4,441,868  
    President and CEO     2015     $ 1,085,121      $ 1,795,847      $ 312,884      $ 746,980      $ 202,688      $ 4,143,520  
      2014     $ 1,015,500      $ 1,773,095      $ 312,456      $ 938,700      $ 330,533      $ 4,370,284  
Anthony J. Restel     2016     $ 525,000      $ 519,761      $ 73,042      $ 343,658      $ 20,828      $ 1,482,289  

    Sr. Executive Vice

    President and CFO

   

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

  $

 

$

518,269

 

480,385

 

 

 

   $

 

$

464,013

 

458,113

 

 

 

   $

 

$

80,851

 

80,741

 

 

 

   $

 

$

298,410

 

367,500

 

 

 

   $

 

$

30,246

 

63,212

 

 

 

   $

 

$

1,391,789

 

1,449,951

 

 

 

Michael J. Brown     2016     $ 625,000      $ 680,020      $ 94,862      $ 409,117      $ 37,543      $ 1,846,542  
    Vice-Chairman and COO     2015     $ 621,154      $ 625,043      $ 108,901      $ 355,250      $ 95,782      $ 1,806,130  
      2014     $ 598,269      $ 617,093      $ 108,754      $ 453,750      $ 74,882      $ 1,852,748  
John R. Davis     2016     $ 475,000      $ 470,233      $ 66,086      $ 269,472      $ 10,809      $ 1,291,600  

    Sr. Executive Vice President M&A,

    Investor Relations and Director of

    Financial Strategy

   

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

  $

 

$

472,115

 

456,154

 

 

 

   $

 

$

435,558

 

430,070

 

 

 

   $

 

$

75,905

 

75,785

 

 

 

   $

 

$

233,991

 

299,000

 

 

 

   $

 

$

7,825

 

45,139

 

 

 

   $

 

$

1,225,394

 

1,306,148

 

 

 

Jefferson G. Parker     2016     $ 500,000      $ 494,997      $ 69,569      $ 327,293      $ 30,201      $ 1,422,060  

    Vice-Chairman, Managing

    Director of Brokerage, Trust and

    Wealth Management

   

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

  $

 

$

497,115

 

480,192

 

 

 

   $

 

$

472,343

 

453,472

 

 

 

   $

 

$

80,027

 

79,911

 

 

 

   $

 

$

284,200

 

363,750

 

 

 

   $

 

$

25,458

 

62,345

 

 

 

   $

 

$

1,359,143

 

1,439,670

 

 

 

 

(1) Amounts in column (c) include salaries deferred under the Company’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation plan in 2016, 2015 and 2014. For Mr. Restel the salaries deferred includes $35,000 and $28,269 in 2016 and 2015, respectively. For Mr. Parker the salaries deferred include $30,000, $29,827, and $28,812 in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

 

(2) Amounts in column (f) include bonuses deferred under the Company’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation plan in 2016, 2015, and 2014. For Mr. Restel the amounts deferred include $51,549, $29,841 and $36,750 in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. For Mr. Davis the amounts deferred include $26,947, $210,592 and $179,400 in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. For Mr. Parker the amounts deferred include $32,729, $28,420, and $21,825 in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

 

(3) The amounts shown in columns (d) and (e) reflect the aggregate grant date value awarded and computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for stock-based and option awards for each of the Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014. The assumptions used for the calculations can be found at Note 18 to our audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and Note 20 to our audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Pursuant to SEC rules, we disregarded the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     49  


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

The amounts shown in column (d) reflect the grant date values of certain awards that are subject to performance conditions. Pursuant to SEC rules, the grant date values shown above are reported based upon the probable outcome of such conditions as of the date of grant. The table below shows the value of such awards at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance is achieved.

 

Name    Year      Maximum
Stock Awards
 

Daryl G. Byrd

     2016      $ 3,942,574  
     2015      $ 2,235,801  
     2014      $ 2,358,134  

Anthony J. Restel

     2016      $ 1,039,522  
     2015      $ 577,697  
     2014      $ 609,277  

Michael J. Brown

     2016      $ 1,355,042  
     2015      $ 778,182  
     2014      $ 820,692  

John R. Davis

     2016      $ 940,489  
     2015      $ 542,247  
     2014      $ 571,974  

Jefferson G. Parker

     2016      $ 989,970  
     2015      $ 584,839  
       2014      $ 603,077  

 

(4) 

ALL OTHER COMPENSATION IN 2016

 

     Perquisites
and Other
Personal
Benefits(i)
     Company
Contributions
to 401(k)
Plan
     Company
Contribution to
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation Plan
     Tax
Reimbursement
     Total  
Name    ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)      ($)  

Daryl G. Byrd

     73,850        1,500        150,000        12,815        238,165  

Anthony J. Restel

     19,328        1,500        -        -        20,828  

Michael J. Brown

     36,043        1,500        -        -        37,543  

John R. Davis

     9,309        1,500        -        -        10,809  

Jefferson G. Parker

     26,926        1,500        -        1,775        30,201  

 

(i)  For a description of perquisites relating to personal use of the corporate aircraft for NEOs, see the “Other Benefits and Limited Perquisites” section. Other perquisites and personal benefits whose incremental cost is included in the amounts shown consist of the following: long-term disability premiums, annual physical examinations, automobile allowances, personal use of a Company vehicle, personal use of the corporate aircraft, social dues, and security alarm expenses.

 

   We estimate the aggregate incremental cost of the Company aircraft to be equal to the average operating cost for the year (which includes items such as fuel, maintenance, landing fees and other direct costs) based on the number of hours flown each year. Direct incremental costs for charter flights are the amount of the charter, and direct incremental costs for the fractional interest in an aircraft are based on the additional hourly charges for the flight, fuel and other direct costs.

 

50   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information concerning grants of awards made to our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2016.

The 2016 stock option grants, restricted stock, and restricted share unit awards to the NEOs were issued from our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, equity-based awards vest on a “change-in-control” occurrence. Dividends are payable on all unvested restricted stock at the same rate paid on all other outstanding shares of our common stock. Dividend equivalent units are added to all unvested restricted share unit grants. In 2016, we declared dividends payable in the amount of $1.40 per share.

 

           

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

   

 

Estimated Future
Payouts

Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

   

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

(#)

   

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Options

(#)

   

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($)

   

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards

($)(1)

 
Name   Grant Date    

Target

($)

   

Maximum

($)

   

Target

(#)

   

Maximum

(#)

         
Daryl G. Byrd     2/18/2016           -       -       13,877 (3)      -       -     $ 657,076  
    2/18/2016           28,221 (2)      70,522       -       -       -     $ 1,314,199  
    2/18/2016           -       -       -       26,485 (3)    $ 47.35     $ 277,033  
            $ 860,245     $ 1,720,490                                                  
Anthony J. Restel     2/18/2016           -       -       3,659 (3)      -       -     $ 173,254  
    2/18/2016           7,441 (2)      18,602       -       -       -     $ 346,507  
    2/18/2016           -       -       -       6,983 (3)    $ 47.35     $ 73,042  
            $ 343,658     $ 687,316                                                  
Michael J. Brown     2/18/2016           -       -       4,836 (3)      -       -     $ 230,006  
    2/18/2016           9,664 (2)      24,159       -       -       -     $ 450,014  
    2/18/2016           -       -       -       9,069 (3)    $ 47.35     $ 94,862  
            $ 409,117     $ 818,234                                                  
John R. Davis     2/18/2016           -       -       3,310 (3)      -       -     $ 156,729  
    2/18/2016           6,732 (2)      16,830       -       -       -     $ 313,504  
    2/18/2016           -       -       -       6,318 (3)    $ 47.35     $ 66,086  
            $ 269,472     $ 538,943                                                  
Jefferson G. Parker     2/18/2016           -       -       3,485 (3)      -       -     $ 165,015  
    2/18/2016           7,086 (2)      17,715       -       -       -     $ 329,982  
    2/18/2016           -       -       -       6,651 (3)    $ 47.35     $ 69,569  
            $ 327,293     $ 654,587                                                  

 

(1)  For option awards, this represents the grant date fair value based on Black Scholes model valuation of $10.46 per share for grants on February 18, 2016. For restricted stock awards, the fair value is based on the grant date fair value of our common stock.

 

(2)  Restricted share units were issued under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Following the end of the three-year performance period, but prior to March 1, 2018, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award value that will vest, which will be between 0% and 250% of the target award value. Payout of the vested RSUs will be effective on March 1, 2018. Any remaining unvested RSUs will be immediately forfeited. The value of the shares on the grant date of each of the RSUs was $47.35 per share.

 

(3)  Restricted stock awards and stock option grants were issued under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and vest over three years in equal increments on the anniversaries of the date of grant.

In 2016, associates, including all current officers who are not executive officers, as a group were granted restricted stock and option awards totaling 211,662 shares under the 2008, 2010 and 2016 Stock Incentive Plans. The weighted average option exercise price was $49.89 per share. All executive officers as a group were granted restricted stock and option awards totaling 119,091 shares under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. The weighted average option exercise price was $47.35 per share. The Company issued a total of 81,821 restricted share units under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan to certain executive officers, including the named executive officers, in 2016.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     51  


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity based awards held by NEOs as of December 31, 2016:

 

Option Awards           Stock Awards  
Name  

Grant

Date

   

Number of

Shares

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

   

Number of

Shares

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price ($)

   

Option

Expiration

Date

          

Grant

Date

   

Number

of

Shares

or Units

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

   

Market

Value of

Shares

That

Have Not

Vested($)((1)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not

Vested (#)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not

Vested ($)(1)

 

Daryl G. Byrd

    12/29/09 (3)      27,500       -     $ 54.43       12/29/19         2/22/12 (7)      3,237     $ 271,099      
    5/4/10 (3)      29,964       -     $ 60.10       05/04/20         2/22/12 (8)      1,811     $ 151,650      
    3/10/11 (3)      23,585       -     $ 55.64       03/10/21         2/19/13 (7)      6,654     $ 557,273      
    2/22/12 (3)      27,108       6,777     $ 52.33       02/22/22         2/19/13 (8)      7,246     $ 606,870      
    2/19/13 (3)      6,787       4,525     $ 52.36       02/19/23         2/17/14 (9)      4,787     $ 400,911      
    2/17/14 (4)      9,793       4,897     $ 65.37       02/17/24         2/17/14 (10)          6,787     $ 568,393  
    2/20/15 (4)      5,313       10,627     $ 62.57       02/20/25         2/17/14 (12)          2,262     $ 189,435  
    2/18/16 (4)      -       26,485     $ 47.35       02/18/26         2/20/15 (9)      10,001     $ 837,584      
                2/20/15 (10)          6,940     $ 581,216  
                2/20/15 (12)          3,507     $ 293,686  
                2/18/16 (9)      13,877     $ 1,162,199      
                2/18/16 (11)          28,221     $ 2,363,497  

Anthony J. Restel

    12/29/09 (3)      11,500       -     $ 54.43       12/29/19               2/22/12 (7)      955     $ 79,981                  
    5/4/10 (3)      8,209       -     $ 60.10       05/04/20         2/22/12 (8)      535     $ 44,802      
    3/10/11 (3)      3,515       -     $ 55.64       03/10/21         2/19/13 (7)      2,005     $ 167,919      
    2/22/12 (3)      8,001       2,000     $ 52.33       02/22/22         2/19/13 (8)      2,183     $ 182,864      
    2/19/13 (3)      2,045       1,364     $ 52.36       02/19/23         2/17/14 (9)      1,237     $ 103,599      
    2/17/14 (4)      2,531       1,265     $ 65.37       02/17/24         2/17/14 (10)          1,754     $ 146,863  
    2/20/15 (4)      1,373       2,746     $ 62.57       02/20/25         2/17/14 (12)          585     $ 48,984  
    2/18/16 (4)      -       6,983     $ 47.35       02/18/26         2/20/15 (9)      2,584     $ 216,410      
                2/20/15 (10)          1,793     $ 150,185  
                2/20/15 (12)          906     $ 75,916  
                2/18/16 (9)      3,659     $ 306,441      
                2/18/16 (11)          7,441     $ 623,169  

Michael J. Brown

    12/29/09 (3)      12,500       -     $ 54.43       12/29/19               2/22/12 (7)      1,290     $ 108,038                  
    5/4/10 (3)      11,493       -     $ 60.10       05/04/20         2/22/12 (8)      722     $ 60,454      
    3/10/11 (3)      7,988       -     $ 55.64       03/10/21         2/19/13 (7)      2,602     $ 217,918      
    2/22/12 (3)      10,802       2,700     $ 52.33       02/22/22         2/19/13 (8)      2,834     $ 237,312      
    2/19/13 (3)      2,654       1,770     $ 52.36       02/19/23         2/17/14 (9)      1,666     $ 139,528      
    2/17/14 (4)      3,409       1,704     $ 65.37       02/17/24         2/17/14 (10)          2,362     $ 197,806  
    2/20/15 (4)      1,849       3,699     $ 62.57       02/20/25         2/17/14 (12)          787     $ 65,906  
    2/18/16 (4)      -       9,069     $ 47.35       02/18/26         2/20/15 (9)      3,481     $ 291,534      
                2/20/15 (10)          2,416     $ 202,310  
                2/20/15 (12)          1,220     $ 102,212  
                2/18/16 (9)      4,752     $ 397,980      
                2/18/16 (11)          9,664     $ 809,320  

John R. Davis

    12/29/09 (3)      896       -     $ 54.43       12/29/19               2/22/12 (7)      955     $ 79,981                  
    5/4/10 (3)      8,893       -     $ 60.10       05/04/20         2/22/12 (8)      535     $ 44,802      
    3/10/11 (3)      3,515       -     $ 55.64       03/10/21         2/19/13 (7)      2,005     $ 167,919      
    2/22/12 (3)      1,905       2,000     $ 52.33       02/22/22         2/19/13 (8)      2,183     $ 182,864      
    2/19/13 (3)      2,045       1,364     $ 52.36       02/19/23         2/17/14 (9)      1,161     $ 97,234      
    2/17/14 (4)      2,375       1,188     $ 65.37       02/17/24         2/17/14 (10)          1,646     $ 137,868  
    2/20/15 (4)      1,289       2,578     $ 62.57       02/20/25         2/17/14 (12)          549     $ 45,956  
    2/18/16 (4)      -       6,318     $ 47.35       02/18/26         2/20/15 (9)      2,426     $ 203,178      
                2/20/15 (10)          1,683     $ 140,946  
                2/20/15 (12)          850     $ 71,225  
                2/18/16 (9)      3,310     $ 277,213      
                                                      2/18/16 (11)                      6,732     $ 563,816  

 

52   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

Option Awards           Stock Awards  
Name  

Grant

Date

   

Number of

Shares

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Exercisable

   

Number of

Shares

Underlying

Unexercised

Options (#)

Unexercisable

   

Option

Exercise

Price ($)

   

Option

Expiration

Date

          

Grant

Date

   

Number

of

Shares

or Units

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)

   

Market

Value of

Shares

That

Have Not

Vested($)((1)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not

Vested (#)

   

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not

Vested ($)(1)

 

Jefferson G. Parker

    9/17/09 (2)      10,000       -     $ 47.67       09/17/19         1/1/10 (6)      1,569     $ 131,365      
    5/4/10 (3)      9,304       -     $ 60.10       05/04/20         4/5/10 (6)      327     $ 27,390      
    3/10/11 (3)      5,858       -     $ 55.64       03/10/21         4/5/10 (5)      1,071     $ 89,696      
    2/22/12 (3)      8,802       2,200     $ 52.33       02/22/22         2/22/12 (7)      1,051     $ 88,021      
    2/19/13 (3)      2,143       1,428     $ 52.36       02/19/23         2/22/12 (8)      588     $ 49,207      
    2/17/14 (4)      2,505       1,252     $ 65.37       02/17/24         2/19/13 (7)      2,101     $ 175,959      
    2/20/15 (4)      1,359       2,718     $ 62.57       02/20/25         2/19/13 (8)      2,288     $ 191,619      
    2/18/16 (4)      -       6,651     $ 47.35       02/18/26         2/17/14 (9)      1,224     $ 102,510      
                2/17/14 (10)          1,736     $ 145,349  
                2/17/14 (12)          579     $ 48,450  
                2/20/15 (9)      2,558     $ 214,233      
                2/20/15 (10)          1,775     $ 148,616  
                2/20/15 (12)          897     $ 75,123  
                2/18/16 (9)      3,485     $ 291,869      
                                                      2/18/16 (11)                      7,086     $ 593,450  

 

(1)  The fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the end of the fiscal year was $83.75 per share.

 

(2)  Options will vest equally in one-seventh increments on the first seven anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(3)  Options will vest equally in one-fifth increments on the first five anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(4)  Options will vest equally in one-third increments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

 

(5)  Restricted stock awards will vest in one-seventh increments over a seven-year period commencing with the first anniversary of the date of grant.

 

(6)  Phantom stock awards, including dividend equivalent units, will vest in one-sixth increments over a seven-year period beginning with the second anniversary of the date of grant.

 

(7)  Restricted stock awards will vest in one-fifth increments over a five-year period commencing with the first anniversary of the date of grant.

 

(8)  Phantom stock awards, including dividend equivalent units, will vest in one-fourth increments over a five-year period commencing with the second anniversary of the date of grant.

 

(9)  Restricted stock awards will vest in one-third increments over a three-year period commencing with the first anniversary of the date of grant.

 

(10)  Following the end of the three-year performance period, but prior to March 1, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award value of the restricted share units that will vest, which will be between 0% and 200% of the target award value. Payout of the vested RSUs will be effective on March 1 of the year following the three year performance. Any remaining unvested RSUs will be immediately forfeited.

 

(11)  Following the end of the three-year performance period, but prior to March 1, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award value of the restricted share units that will vest, which will be between 0% and 250% of the target award value. Payout of the vested RSUs will be effective on March 1 of the year following the three year performance. Any remaining unvested RSUs will be immediately forfeited.

 

(12)  Following the end of the one-year performance period, but prior to March 1, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award Performance Units that will be eligible to vest, which will be between 0% and 100% of the target award Performance Units (the “Actual Award”). The Performance Units representing the difference between the target Performance Unit Award and the Actual Award will be immediately forfeited. The Actual Award units will vest over three years in equal installments on March 1st following the first and through the third anniversary of the grant date.

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     53  


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the amount realized by each Named Executive Officer as a result of the exercise of stock options and vesting of stock awards in 2016.

 

     Option Awards      Stock Awards  
Name   

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

    

Value Realized on

Exercise

($)

    

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Vesting

(#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)

 

Daryl G. Byrd

     50,000      $ 1,079,580        32,447 (1)    $  1,596,466 (1) 

Anthony J. Restel

     3,656      $ 42,666        8,709 (2)    $  423,249 (2) 

Michael J. Brown

     13,952      $ 167,580        11,170 (3)    $  543,625 (3) 

John R. Davis

     24,952      $ 428,401        8,208 (4)    $  399,194 (4) 

Jefferson G. Parker

     -      $ -        14,257 (5)    $  755,897 (5) 

 

(1)  Includes 7,574 shares of phantom stock awards at a value of $373,150 and 3,950 performance units at a value of $195,071.

 

(2)  Includes 2,087 shares of phantom stock awards at a value of $101,905 and 1,020 performance units at a value of $50,345.

 

(3)  Includes 2,769 shares of phantom stock awards at a value of $135,312 and 1,376 performance units at a value of $67,923.

 

(4)  Includes 2,087 shares of phantom stock awards at a value of $101,905 and 958 performance units at a value of $47,300.

 

(5)  Includes 4,022 shares of phantom stock awards at a value of $203,891 and 1,010 performance units at a value of $49,857.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

We offer directors and a select group of management and highly compensated key associates the right to participate in a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants may elect to defer up to 90% of their annual base salary or incentive compensation, including incentive bonuses, service bonuses, and commissions. The Plan allows for discretionary employer contributions. The investment options available under the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan are similar to those available under the Company’s 401(k) plan. Earnings are credited to the account based on the performance of the investment options selected. Participants vest immediately in their deferrals. As a general rule, payment terms of deferred amounts and investment options are determined by the participant during enrollment and are subject to a deferral of at least two years, except under certain qualifying events, including the participant’s separation from service, a change in control, an unforeseeable emergency, or death. Payment shall be made in a single lump sum or, in the event of a separation from service after reaching age 65, disability, or scheduled in-service distribution, in equal annual installments over the period specified by the participant, not to exceed five years. The following table shows certain information for Named Executive Officers under the Corporation’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Messrs. Byrd, Restel, Davis and Parker are the Named Executive Officers currently participating in the Company’s Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

Name   

Executive

Contributions

in Last Fiscal

Year

($)

   

Registrant

Contribution

in Last Fiscal

Year

($)

   

Aggregate

Earnings in

Last Fiscal

Year

($)

    

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

    

Aggregate

Balance at Last

Fiscal Year

End

($)

 

Daryl G. Byrd

     373,150 (1)      150,000 (5)      396,804        -        2,544,948  

Anthony J. Restel

     64,841 (2)      -       49,445        -        558,664  

Michael J. Brown

     -       -       -        -        -  

John R. Davis

     210,592 (3)      -       18,459        -        938,187  

Jefferson G. Parker

     58,420 (4)      -       36,130        -        313,202  

 

(1)  Mr. Byrd’s contribution includes $373,150 from vested phantom stock payments.

 

(2)  Mr. Restel’s contribution includes $35,000 of his base pay deferred, and $29,841 of his bonus earned in 2015 as set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

 

(3)  Mr. Davis’ contribution includes $210,592 of his bonus earned in 2015 as set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

 

(4)  Mr. Parker’s contribution includes $30,000 of his base pay deferred and $28,420 of his bonus earned in 2015 as set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

 

(5)  Company contribution in 2016 attributable to 2015 service. The Company contribution to the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan attributable to 2016 was made after December 31, 2016 and is not reflected in the aggregate year-end balance for Mr. Byrd. These amounts are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

 

54   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, the weighted average price of such securities and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance, as of December 31, 2016.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Category   

Number of

securities to be

issued upon

exercise of

outstanding

options,

warrants

and rights

   

Weighted-

average

exercise price of

outstanding

options,

warrants and

rights (1)

    

Number of

securities

remaining and

available for

future issuance (2)

 

Plans approved by shareholders

     1,135,746 (3)    $ 55.06        2,456,052  

Plans not approved by shareholders

     5,231 (4)    $ 98.96        -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1,140,977     $ 55.38        2,456,052  

 

(1)  Restricted stock shares were not included when calculating the weighted-average exercise price.

 

(2)  Remaining shares available for issuance include 2,456,052 shares under the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. Shares remaining to be issued subsequent to December 31, 2016 under the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan include 1,228,025 shares that can be issued either as a restricted stock grant or upon exercise of stock options and 2,456,052 shares that can only be issued upon exercise of stock options.

 

(3)  Number of securities includes 3,349, 10,859, 380,352, and 24,879 shares of unvested restricted stock granted under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan, 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan, 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, and 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively.

 

(4)  Includes 4,137 shares available for issuance under the OMNI BANCSHARES, Inc. Amended and Restated Performance and Equity Incentive Plan, which was assumed by the Company in its acquisition of OMNI BANCSHARES, Inc. on June 1, 2011. The aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance at the date of acquisition was 41,979. Also includes 1,094 shares available for issuance under the Florida Gulf Bancorp, Inc. Officers’ and Employees’ Stock Option Plan, which was assumed by the Company in its acquisition of Florida Gulf Bancorp, Inc. on July 31, 2012. The aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance at the date of acquisition was 32,863.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Company provides benefits to the Named Executive Officers upon certain terminations of employment from the Company. These benefits are in addition to the benefits to which the executives would be entitled upon a termination of employment generally (i.e., vested retirement benefits accrued as of the date of termination, stock awards that have vested as of the date of termination and the right to elect continued health coverage pursuant to COBRA). The incremental benefits payable to the executives are described below.

We have entered into Change in Control Severance Agreements with members of senior management, including each of our Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Byrd. Except for these agreements, and our broad-based severance policy, none of our Named Executive Officers, other than President and CEO Byrd, have employment arrangements. Mr. Byrd’s employment agreement requires payment of compensation and/or benefits under various termination of employment situations. In addition to change in control payments consistent with those of the other Named Executive Officers, if Mr. Byrd’s employment had been terminated at December 31, 2016, he would have been entitled to (i) a salary of $2,737,875 and benefits of $73,541, in the event of termination other than for Cause, death or disability, (ii) annual compensation of $1,095,150, benefits of $39,742, and any appropriate bonus as determined by the Compensation Committee, in the event of termination due to death, and (iii) $39,742 in benefits in the event of termination due to disability. These agreements are described more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section.

In 2000, we entered into separate Change in Control Severance Agreements with John R. Davis and Michael J. Brown providing for severance pay and benefits to the individual upon voluntary resignation within 30 days after a Change in Control of IBERIABANK Corporation, as defined, or if within three years of a Change in Control the individual resigns for Good Reason, as defined, or is terminated by the Company or its successor without Just Cause, as defined. In 2006, we amended and restated the 2005 Change in Control Severance Agreement with Anthony J. Restel, and in 2009, we entered into a separate Change in Control Severance Agreement with Jefferson G. Parker. The severance payment is 100% in the case of Mr. Davis, Mr. Brown, Mr. Parker and Mr. Restel, of each individual’s 280G Maximum, defined generally as 2.99 times his average compensation over the previous five years. In addition, each will be entitled to

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     55  


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation

 

continued medical and life insurance benefits at the Company’s expense for 39 months following termination of employment. We will also make the individual whole for any excise tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code with respect to any payments under the agreement. Each of these agreements was amended in 2008 to comply with the deferred compensation requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

As of December 31, 2016, NEOs held unexercisable options to purchase common stock and unvested shares of restricted common stock, phantom stock, restricted share units and performance units listed in the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table.

 

Name   

Cash

Severance

    

Stock Option

Acceleration(1)

    

Restricted Stock,

Phantom Stock,

RSUs and

Performance

Units

Acceleration(2)

     Benefits(3)     

Tax

Payments(4)

     Total  

Daryl G. Byrd

   $ 9,629,214      $ 1,634,114      $ 7,983,811      $ 95,604      $ 5,003,909      $ 24,346,652  

Anthony J. Restel

   $ 3,665,242      $ 441,248      $ 2,147,133      $ 72,039      $ 1,817,548      $ 8,143,210  

Michael J. Brown

   $ 5,228,077      $ 580,170      $ 2,830,316      $ 81,575      $ 2,549,846      $ 11,269,984  

John R. Davis

   $ 3,559,981      $ 412,069      $ 2,012,999      $ 93,078      $ 1,752,677      $ 7,830,804  

Jefferson G. Parker

   $ 3,995,652      $ 436,624      $ 2,372,856      $ 94,904      $ 1,965,261      $ 8,865,297  

 

(1)  Assumes the immediate vesting of all unvested in-the-money stock options and the associated cash proceeds resulting from a same day sale exercise of only those previously unvested stock options using the fair market value of our common stock at December 31, 2016, of $83.75.

 

(2)  Assumes the immediate vesting of all unvested restricted and phantom stock, restricted share units and performance units upon a Change in Control using the fair market value of our common stock at December 31, 2016, of $83.75.

 

(3)  Represents the cost to continue medical insurance, life insurance and other benefits for a period of 39 months following termination.

 

(4)  Represents taxes associated with “excess parachute payments.” These taxes include any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code as well as any federal, state or local tax resulting from the excise tax payment.

 

56   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Director Compensation

The following table provides information concerning the fees earned and other compensation of the Board of Directors for the year ended December 31, 2016:

 

Name  

Fees

Earned

or Paid

in Cash

($)

   

Stock

Awards

($)(2)(3)

   

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

Total

($)

 

William H. Fenstermaker

    72,000       69,324     -     141,324  

E. Stewart Shea, III

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

Elaine D. Abell

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

Harry V. Barton, Jr.

    62,004 (1)      69,324     -     131,328  

Ernest P. Breaux, Jr.

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

John N. Casbon

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

Angus R. Cooper, II

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

John E. Koerner, III

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

Rick E. Maples

    41,336       69,324     -     110,660  

David H. Welch

    62,004       69,324     -     131,328  

 

(1)  Amounts include monthly board member fees deferred under the Company’s Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Mr. Barton deferred $55,800 during 2016.

 

(2)  Represents the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted in 2016.

 

(3)  Each outside director was granted 1,200 shares of restricted stock on May 5, 2016 with a grant date fair value of $57.77 per share. Awards become vested and non-forfeitable on the first anniversary from the date of the award. At December 31, 2016, all directors had 1,200 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding.

 

Cash and Stock Payments. Each director who is not employed (referred to as outside directors or non-management directors), except the Chairman, is paid a fee of $5,167 per month. Rick Maples joined the Board in May of 2016 and received a monthly fee of $5,167 from May to December. The Chairman receives a fee of $6,000 per month. Members of the Board of Directors receive no additional compensation for their participation on any committee or for other services as our directors. During 2016 Daryl G. Byrd, President and CEO, was the only director employed by the Company.

During 2016, the Compensation Committee authorized each outside director to receive 1,200 shares of restricted stock (which were valued based on the closing price of the common stock as of the date of the award of $57.77). All of these shares of restricted stock will vest over a one-year period, and the total value of these awards will be allocated on the first anniversary from the date of the award. The Company did not issue any stock options or

non-equity incentive compensation to any member of its Board of Directors. In addition, the Company does not sponsor a defined benefit pension plan and has not paid other forms of compensation as defined in Item 402(j) of Regulation S-K to its Board of Directors during 2016.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding director compensation. These recommendations are based upon, among other things, the Committee’s consideration of compensation paid to directors of comparable financial institutions.

Other Benefits. Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law so that they will be free from undue concern about personal liability in connection with their service to the Company. We also provide our directors with customary directors and officers liability insurance coverage.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     57  


Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the name of each current executive officer and the principal position he or she holds.

 

Name    Age      Position

Daryl G. Byrd

     62      President and Chief Executive Officer

Michael J. Brown

     53      Vice-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer

Jefferson G. Parker

     64      Vice-Chairman and Managing Director of Brokerage, Trust and Wealth Management

Anthony J. Restel

     47      Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

John R. Davis

     56      Senior Executive Vice President, Mergers and Acquisitions, Investor Relations, and Director of Financial Strategy

Elizabeth A. Ardoin

     48      Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Communications, Facilities and Human Resources

J. Randolph Bryan

     49      Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer

Robert M. Kottler

     58      Executive Vice President and Director of Retail, Small Business and Mortgage

H. Spurgeon Mackie, Jr.

     66      Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

Robert B. Worley, Jr.

     57      Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

 

DARYL G. BYRD has served as our President since 1999 and as Chief Executive Officer since 2000. He also serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of IBERIABANK.

MICHAEL J. BROWN has served as Senior Executive Vice President since 2001. In 2009, Mr. Brown was appointed Vice-Chairman and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Brown is responsible for management of all of our banking markets.

JEFFERSON G. PARKER has served as our Vice-Chairman and Managing Director of Brokerage, Trust, and Wealth Management since 2009. From 1976 to 2009, Mr. Parker worked for Howard Weil, Inc., an energy research and investment-banking boutique serving institutional investors. He served as President of Howard Weil from 2004 to 2009. Mr. Parker served on our Board of Directors from 2001 to 2009. Upon his employment by the Company, Mr. Parker resigned as a member of our Board of Directors.

ANTHONY J. RESTEL has served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2005. Mr. Restel was hired as Vice President and Treasurer in 2001 and previously served as Chief Credit Officer of our bank subsidiary.

JOHN R. DAVIS has served as Senior Executive Vice President-Mergers and Acquisitions and Investor Relations since 2001. He also serves as Director of Financial Strategy.

ELIZABETH A. ARDOIN joined the Company in 2002 as Senior Vice President and Director of Communications,

after serving as Publisher for The Times of Acadiana. Today she serves as Senior Executive Vice President, overseeing the Company’s Communications, Marketing, Human Resources, and Corporate Real Estate functions.

J. RANDOLPH BRYAN joined the Company in 2012 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer since July 2012. Mr. Bryan previously served as Director of Strategic Initiatives and Mergers and Acquisitions prior to becoming Chief Risk Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bryan served as Chief Operating Officer for First Southern Bancorp in Boca Raton, Florida from February 2010 to April 2012. Prior to that, the majority of Mr. Bryan’s banking career was spent at Capital One/Hibernia National Bank, where he held a number of different leadership roles over a 13-year period, including responsibility for Capital One’s Banking Sales Arena, which included marketing and delivery channel management, national direct banking, client experience, corporate communications, and public relations.

ROBERT M. KOTTLER has served as Executive Vice President and Director of Retail and Small Business since 2011. Mr. Kottler is responsible for the Retail Segment, including retail operations, consumer lending, credit cards, sales, retail training and small business. He also serves as Director of Mortgage. Previously, he was Executive Vice President for Small Business Banking at Capital One Bank from May 2006 to March 2011. Prior to that, he was Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Sales Support Officer for Hibernia Corporation.

 

 

58   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Executive Officers

 

H. SPURGEON MACKIE, JR. served as Executive Vice President and Executive Credit Officer since 2010 until appointed Chief Credit Officer on May 14, 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mackie served as Executive Director of the Community Foundation of Gaston County, Inc. from August 2006 to March 2010. Prior to that, he worked for First Union/Wachovia in numerous capacities for 32 years, including Area President, Chief Credit Officer for Interstate Banking, and Chief Risk Officer for the General Bank, among others.

ROBERT B. WORLEY, JR. has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since his appointment in 2011. Before joining the Company, Mr. Worley practiced law in New Orleans with the Jones Walker law firm, where he was a partner, and had served as the Chairman of the firm’s Professional Employment Committee and on the firm’s Board of Directors. Before that, Mr. Worley was a shareholder (partner) in The Kullman Firm, a law firm in New Orleans. He has practiced law for 31 years.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     59  


Table of Contents

Certain Transactions

 

A number of our directors, executive officers, and members of their immediate families, as well as organizations with which they are affiliated, were clients of IBERIABANK during 2016. All loans to our related persons—as defined in Instruction 1 to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K—were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those provided at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lender, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

IBERIABANK and several other financial institutions previously extended credit (the “Credit Facility”) under a multi-bank syndicated credit facility to Stone Energy Corporation (the “Borrower”). One of the Company’s directors, David H. Welch, is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Borrower. IBERIABANK held approximately six percent of the total commitments from twelve banks under the Credit Facility. On December 14, 2016, the Borrower filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas. At the time of the filing, $341.5 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, with approximately $20.3 million outstanding and due to IBERIABANK. At December 31, 2016, the outstanding amount due IBERIABANK under the Credit Facility was on non-accrual status. On February 15, 2017, Borrower’s Second Amended Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) was confirmed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. Pursuant to the Plan, banks under the Credit Facility were allowed a claim in the aggregate principal amount of $341.5 million, which was the principal amount outstanding under the Credit Facility at the time of the bankruptcy filing. The confirmed Plan proposed a full recovery to the banks under the Credit Facility of their prepetition claims, including IBERIABANK’s prepetition claim of approximately $20.3 million. The Plan further provided that banks under the Credit Facility were to receive, on account of their prepetition claims, (i) their respective pro rata share of commitments and obligations owing with respect to outstanding loans under a new 4-year Reserve Based Lending Facility (the “Exit Facility”), and (ii) their respective pro rata share of prepetition cash as a partial repayment of such outstanding loans subject to re-borrowing to the extent permitted and pursuant to the terms of the Exit Facility held by such banks. On February 28, 2017, the Plan became effective and the

Borrower satisfied the entire amount due and owing to the financial institutions on their claim of $341.5 million, including payment to IBERIABANK of approximately $20.3 million. On that same date, having emerged from the Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Borrower entered into the new Exit Facility with the lenders, including IBERIABANK. The new Exit Facility, which replaces the Credit Facility, provides for a $200 million reserve-based credit facility with a maturity date of February 21, 2021. Interest on advances under the Exit Facility is calculated using the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) or the base rate, at the election of the Borrower, plus, in each case an applicable margin. The applicable margin is determined based on borrower base utilization and ranges from 2.00% to 3.00% per annum for base rate loans and 3.00% to 4.00% per annum for LIBOR loans. IBERIABANK holds a six percent pro-rata share, or $12 million, of the $200 million total committed under the new facility. At this time there are no draws or outstanding amounts under the Exit Facility.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits a public company from extending or renewing credit or arranging the extension or renewal of credit to an officer or director. However, this prohibition does not apply to loans made by depository institutions such as IBERIABANK that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and are subject to the insider lending restrictions of the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation O. Accordingly, we permit our directors and executive officers, their family members and their related interests, to establish and maintain banking and business relationships in the ordinary course of business with IBERIABANK. With respect to lending activities, IBERIABANK has policies governing affiliate and insider lending transactions. These policies prohibit extensions of credit to “insiders,” as defined in the policies, unless the extension of credit:

 

  is made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms (including interest rates and collateral) as, and following credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with members of the general public; and

 

  does not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
 

 

60   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Certain Transactions

 

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions With Related Persons

 

Audit Committee review is required for any lending transaction that alone or together with other extensions of credit to an “insider” exceeds $120,000 and does not meet the criteria noted above or which becomes a past due, nonaccrual, restructured or a potential problem loan as of year-end under applicable SEC rules. Also, in compliance with Regulation O, a majority of the Board of Directors of IBERIABANK must approve in advance any extension of credit to any director or executive officer or any of their related entities where the aggregate lending relationship exceeds $500,000. A director with an interest in the extension of credit must abstain from voting or participating in the discussion and approval of the extension of credit.

An extension of credit covered by Regulation O to executive officers must be promptly reported to the Board of Directors of IBERIABANK; preceded by the submission of a detailed personal financial statement; and made subject to the written provision that the loan

will, at the option of IBERIABANK, be due and payable at any time that the executive officer is indebted to any other bank or banks in an amount greater than the dollar thresholds set forth above.

In order to promote compliance with applicable laws, regulations and rules pertaining to “insider” lending transactions discussed above, we have appointed an officer to assist in identifying and reviewing pertinent transactions with identified “insiders.” The officer annually receives lists of all directors and executive officers of the Company and IBERIABANK and any other subsidiaries, as well as a list of our principal shareholders, if any. The information collected from directors and executive officers includes the names of these individuals and their family members, as well as the names of their related interests, which are referred to as “covered entities.” The officer will promptly notify in the event the officer detects an extension of credit to an “insider” that appears to violate the policy.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     61  


Table of Contents

Proposal IV—Advisory Vote on Frequency of Voting on Named Executive Officer Compensation

Purpose of the Proposal

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires us to submit a non-binding, advisory resolution to shareholders at least once every six years to determine whether advisory votes on executive compensation should be held every year, every two years or every three years. In satisfaction of this requirement, shareholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of the Company advise that an advisory resolution with respect to Named Executive Officer compensation should be presented to the shareholders every year, every two years or every three years, as reflected by their votes for each of these alternatives in connection with this resolution.”

In voting on this resolution, you should mark your proxy for one year, two years or three years based on your preference as to the frequency with which an advisory vote on executive compensation should be held. If you have no preference you should abstain.

The optimal frequency of the vote necessarily is based on a judgment about the relative benefits and burdens of each of the options. There are different views as to the best approach. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors recognize that there is a reasonable basis for each of the options.

Some believe that a less frequent vote would: (i) permit shareholders to focus on overall design issues rather than on the details of individual decisions, (ii) align with the

goals of our compensation arrangements which are designed to reward performance that promotes long-term shareholder value, and (iii) avoid the burdens that annual votes would impose on shareholders required to evaluate the compensation programs of a large number of companies each year.

Others believe that an annual vote affords shareholders the opportunity to react promptly to emerging trends in compensation, provides feedback before those trends become pronounced over time, and gives the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors an opportunity to evaluate individual compensation decisions each year in light of ongoing feedback from shareholders.

Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2011, and the overwhelming majority voted hold the advisory vote on executive compensation every year. The Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors continue to believe that the best corporate practice and governance favor an annual advisory vote and the Board should solicit an annual vote from our shareholders. For these reasons, the Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR a ONE YEAR advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation.

Although this advisory vote by our shareholders will be non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will consider the voting results when determining the frequency of the advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation.

 

 

Vote Required

 

Pursuant to NASDAQ rules and our Bylaws, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes actually cast is required for approval of Proposal IV.

 

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR A FREQUENCY OF “ONE YEAR” FOR NON-BINDING, ADVISORY SHAREHOLDER VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

62   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Proposal IV—Advisory Vote on Frequency of Voting on Named Executive Officer Compensation

 

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

 

After careful consideration of this matter, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors believe that, initially, the Board should solicit an annual vote from our shareholders. For that reason, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR a ONE YEAR advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation. The Compensation Committee and our Board determined that approval of proposed frequency of

votes on executive compensation is appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Although this advisory vote will be non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will consider the voting results when determining the frequency of the advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation.

 

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     63  


Table of Contents

Shareholder Proposals

 

Any proposal which a shareholder wishes to have included in the proxy materials relating to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be in compliance with Rule 14a-8 under the 1934 Act and received at our principal executive offices, 200 West Congress Street, Lafayette, Louisiana 70501, Attention: Robert B. Worley, Jr., Secretary, no later than December 8, 2017. With respect to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if we are not provided notice of a shareholder proposal by such date, it will not be included in our Proxy Statement and form of proxy.

Shareholder proposals which are not submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials may be brought before an annual meeting pursuant to Article 9D of our Articles of Incorporation, which provides that the shareholder must give timely notice thereof in writing to our Secretary, setting forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting (a) a brief description of the proposal desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, (b) the name and address, as they appear on our books, of the shareholder proposing such business and, to the extent known, any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be

supporting such proposal, (c) the class and number of shares of our capital stock which are beneficially owned by the shareholder on the date of such shareholder notice and, to the extent known, by any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be supporting such proposal on the date of such shareholder notice, and (d) any financial interest of the shareholder in such proposal (other than interests which all shareholders would have). To be timely with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2018, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive offices no later than 60 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or March 10, 2018. With respect to the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if we do not receive a shareholder’s notice by such date, proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary authority to vote on such proposal without any discussion of the matter in the Proxy Statement.

In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above.

 

 

64   

LOGO

   2017 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Other Matters

Management is not aware of any business to come before the Annual Meeting other than the matters described above in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting as to which proxies in the accompanying form confers discretionary authority the persons named therein will vote such proxies as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors.

A COPY OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, AS FILED WITH THE SEC, WILL BE FURNISHED WITHOUT CHARGE TO SHAREHOLDERS AS OF THE RECORD DATE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY, IBERIABANK CORPORATION, 200 WEST CONGRESS STREET, 12TH FLOOR, LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA 70501.

By Order of the Board of Directors      

 

LOGO

Robert B. Worley, Jr.                            

Secretary                                               

Lafayette, Louisiana

April 7, 2017

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the

2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 9, 2017

This Notice and Proxy Statement, the Company’s 2016 Annual Report to Shareholders and the Company’s

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, are available electronically at

http://www.iberiabank.com/globalassets/proxy-2017.pdf

 

LOGO

     2017 Proxy Statement     65  


Table of Contents

LOGO

 


Table of Contents

LOGO

     LOGO
    

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

 

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

 

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

 

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 9, 2017.

    

 

LOGO

  

 

   Vote by Internet

 

•    Go to www.investorvote.com/IBKC

 

•    Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

 

•    Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

    

Vote by telephone

 

•    Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA,   US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

 

•    Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.        

 

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

 

 

 A    Proposal  —   The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 listed hereon, and recommends a vote FOR the “1 YEAR” option in Proposal 4 listed hereon.   
      

1. Election of Directors:

    Nominees for a three-year term expiring in 2020:

         LOGO     
    01 - Harry V. Barton, Jr.   02 - E. Stewart Shea III    03 - David H. Welch   

 

   

Mark here to vote        

FOR all nominees

    

Mark here to WITHHOLD

vote from all nominees

             For All EXCEPT - To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), write the name(s) of such nominee(s) below.   
            

 

  
    For   Against  

 

  Abstain

        For    Against    Abstain

2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

          

3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

        
  1 Year   2 Years   3 Years   Abstain              

4. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

             Note: Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.         

 

 B    Non-Voting Items           
Change of Address — Please print your new address below.      Comments — Please print your comments below.    Meeting Attendance   
            Mark the box to the
right if you plan to
attend the Annual
Meeting.
  

 

 

 

 

            
 C    Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

 

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

 

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.     Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.     Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.   
      /       /               

 

 

LOGO

02J0GF


Table of Contents

Annual Meeting Admission Ticket

Annual Meeting of

IBERIABANK Corporation Shareholders

May 9, 2017, 4:00 PM, Central Time

Windsor Court Hotel

300 Gravier Street

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130

Upon arrival, please present this admission ticket

and photo identification at the registration desk.

 

 

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Proxy — IBERIABANK Corporation

 

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — May 9, 2017

 

Elaine D. Abell and John N. Casbon, or either of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of IBERIABANK Corporation to be held on May 9, 2017 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

 

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as specified. If no such directions are indicated, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3, and will be voted FOR the “1 YEAR” option in Proposal 4. If any other business is presented as to which this proxy confers discretionary authority, this proxy will be voted as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors. You may revoke this proxy at any time before the time it is voted at the Annual Meeting.

 

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

 

 

LOGO

q PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

 

 

 

 A    Proposal — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 listed hereon, and
                        recommends a vote FOR the “1 YEAR” option in Proposal 4 listed hereon.
1.   Election of Directors:             +
  Nominees for a three-year term expiring in 2020:        
 

 

                          01 - Harry V. Barton, Jr.                    02 - E. Stewart Shea III                     03 - David H. Welch

   
   

Mark here to vote

FOR all nominee

   

Mark here to WITHHOLD

vote from all nominees

    For All EXCEPT - To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), write the name(s) of such nominee(s) below.      
           

 

                                                                                              

     
    For   Against   Abstain       For   Against   Abstain

2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

           

3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

     
  1 Year   2 Years   3 Years   Abstain          

4. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

            Note: Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.      

 

 B    Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

 

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

 

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.     Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.     Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.
    /    /                    

 

LOGO

02J0HF


Table of Contents

 

 

q   PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 

Proxy — IBERIABANK Corporation

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — May 9, 2017

Elaine D. Abell and John N. Casbon, or either of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of IBERIABANK Corporation to be held on May 9, 2017 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as specified. If no such directions are indicated, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3, and will be voted FOR the “1 YEAR” option in Proposal 4. If any other business is presented as to which this proxy confers discretionary authority, this proxy will be voted as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors. You may revoke this proxy at any time before the time it is voted at the Annual Meeting.

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)


Table of Contents
LOGO      LOGO
    

 

Electronic Voting Instructions

 

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

 

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

 

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 9, 2017.

    

 

LOGO

  

 

   Vote by Internet

 

•   Go to www.investorvote.com/IBKC

 

•   Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

 

•   Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

    

Vote by telephone

 

•   Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA,  US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

 

•   Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.        

 

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

 

 

 A    Proposal  —   The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 listed hereon, and recommends a vote FOR the “1 YEAR” option in Proposal 4 listed hereon.   
      

1. Election of Directors:

    Nominees for a three-year term expiring in 2020:

         LOGO     
    01 - Harry V. Barton, Jr.   02 - E. Stewart Shea III    03 - David H. Welch   

 

   

Mark here to vote        

FOR all nominees

    

Mark here to WITHHOLD

vote from all nominees

             For All EXCEPT - To withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s), write the name(s) of such nominee(s) below.   
            

 

  
    For   Against  

 

  Abstain

        For    Against    Abstain

2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

          

3. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

        
  1 Year   2 Years   3 Years   Abstain              

4. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future shareholder advisory voting on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers.

             Note: Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.         

 

 B    Non-Voting Items           
Change of Address — Please print your new address below.      Comments — Please print your comments below.    Meeting Attendance   
            Mark the box to the
right if you plan to
attend the Annual
Meeting.
  

 

 

 

 

            
 C    Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

 

Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title.

 

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.     Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.     Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.   
      /       /               

 

 

LOGO

02KFRD


Table of Contents

 

 

 

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.   q

 

 

 

 

Proxy — IBERIABANK CORPORATION RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

 

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP VOTE AUTHORIZATION FORM

Solicited on behalf of the Trustee of the IBERIABANK Corporation Retirement Savings Plan

I understand that I have the right to direct the IBERIABANK Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) trustee (the “Trustee”) to vote my proportionate interest in the common stock of IBERIABANK Corporation held in my Plan accounts. I have been advised that my voting instructions are solicited for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of IBERIABANK Corporation to be held at the Windsor Court Hotel, 300 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana on Tuesday, May 9, 2017, at 4:00 p.m., Central Time, or an adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

I hereby direct the Trustee to vote my shares as follows:

If any other business is brought before the Annual Meeting, this form will be voted by the Trustee in a manner intended to represent the best interest of participants and beneficiaries of the Plan. At the present time, the Company knows of no other business to be brought before the Annual Meeting.

The Trustee is hereby directed to vote my proportionate interest in the common stock of IBERIABANK Corporation in my Plan account as indicated above. If I do not return this form in a timely manner, no instruction is specified or the form is returned signed without instruction, shares representing my interest in the Plan will be voted in proportion to the manner in which other participants have voted their interests, subject to the determination that such a vote is for the exclusive benefit of Plan participants and beneficiaries.

I understand that my voting instructions will be kept confidential. I acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting and Annual Meeting Proxy Statement, dated April 7, 2017. If you have any questions regarding your vote authorization, please contact Human Resources at (337) 521-4041.


Table of Contents

LOGO

IBERIABANK CORPORATION

CONFIDENTIAL IBERIABANK CORPORATION RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

 

LOGO  

 

SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEE OF THE

IBERIABANK CORPORATION RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

 

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 9, 2017

 

Shares of common stock of IBERIABANK Corporation (the “Company”) are held by the Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) in the participants’ accounts. In accordance with the Plan’s documents, shares of the Company’s common stock held by the Plan are eligible to be counted toward the shareholder vote at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the Windsor Court Hotel, 300 Gravier Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, on Tuesday, May 9, 2017, at 4:00 p.m., local time (the “Meeting”). Therefore, as a participant in the Plan with an investment in shares of Company common stock as of March 21, 2017, the record date for the Meeting, you are eligible to direct the vote of your proportionate share of the Company common stock held in the Plan.

 

The 2017 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement of the Company is available at http://ir.iberiabank.com.

 

The Principal Trust Company is the trustee of the Retirement Savings Plan. The Trustee is directed to vote those shares of the Company common stock held in the Plan proportionately in accordance with the timely voting instructions it receives from participants. The Company has retained Computershare as its agent to receive the Plan Vote Authorization Forms completed by participants in the Plan and to tabulate the results.

 

The Trustee is forwarding the Confidential Plan Voting Instructions and Plan Vote Authorization Form so that you may convey your individual voting instructions to the Trustee on the matters to be considered at the Meeting and on such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. The Company is not aware of any other business to be brought before the Meeting other than as set forth in the accompanying proxy statement. Your individual vote will not be revealed to the Company. In order to direct the voting of your proportionate share of the Company common stock held in the Plan, you must complete, sign and date the Plan Vote Authorization Form and return it in the accompanying postage-paid envelope to Computershare, the voting tabulator, at the following address: Computershare, P.O. Box 30170, College Station, Texas 77842-3170, by 11:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 9, 2017.

 

Your vote and the votes of other participants will be tallied by Computershare and the results provided to the Trustee who will:

 

 

1.

 

vote the shares held in the Plan on the proposals specified on the Plan Vote Authorization Form, based on the timely voting instructions they have received from participants; and

 

 

2.

 

 

vote the shares as to which participants have not given timely instructions in the same proportion as the shares for which they have received timely voting instructions to vote, so long as such vote is solely in the interests of the participants and beneficiaries and in accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The effect of the foregoing procedure is that all shares of the Company common stock held in the Plan will be voted on the proposals specified on the Plan Vote Authorization Form in the same proportion as the votes timely received from participants

 

 

If you have any questions regarding these Voting Instructions, please contact Human Resources at (337) 521-4041.

 

 

 

02K9FD