Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-14659
WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
51-0328154 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street, |
|
|
Wilmington, Delaware
|
|
19890 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(302) 651-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ | |
Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer o | |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2010 |
Common stock Par Value $1.00
|
|
91,197,969 shares |
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
PART 1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
188.2 |
|
|
$ |
202.9 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
130.5 |
|
|
|
165.4 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
658.1 |
|
|
|
747.6 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $101.8 in 2010 and $101.8 in 2009) |
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
765.0 |
|
|
|
860.5 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans |
|
|
2,539.1 |
|
|
|
2,627.0 |
|
Real estate construction loans |
|
|
1,872.9 |
|
|
|
1,956.4 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
2,130.0 |
|
|
|
2,102.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
6,542.0 |
|
|
|
6,685.7 |
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
428.2 |
|
|
|
431.0 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,319.5 |
|
|
|
1,408.9 |
|
Loans secured with investments |
|
|
425.9 |
|
|
|
441.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail loans |
|
|
2,173.6 |
|
|
|
2,281.5 |
|
Total loans, net of unearned income of $6.2 in 2010 and $6.4 in 2009 |
|
|
8,715.6 |
|
|
|
8,967.2 |
|
Reserve for loan losses |
|
|
(299.8 |
) |
|
|
(251.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
8,415.8 |
|
|
|
8,715.7 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
141.1 |
|
|
|
146.8 |
|
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $29.8 in 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
359.6 |
|
|
|
363.2 |
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $44.8 in
2010 and $49.9 in 2009 |
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
483.6 |
|
|
|
493.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,622.1 |
|
|
$ |
11,097.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
676.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,470.6 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
930.6 |
|
|
|
921.5 |
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
|
3,980.9 |
|
|
|
3,590.7 |
|
Certificates under $100,000 |
|
|
1,003.8 |
|
|
|
1,000.6 |
|
Local certificates $100,000 and over |
|
|
123.7 |
|
|
|
136.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
6,715.7 |
|
|
|
7,120.3 |
|
National brokered certificates |
|
|
1,107.6 |
|
|
|
1,270.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
7,823.3 |
|
|
|
8,390.9 |
|
Short-term borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase |
|
|
429.5 |
|
|
|
575.8 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
457.5 |
|
|
|
603.8 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
286.3 |
|
|
|
295.7 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
443.5 |
|
|
|
442.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,068.1 |
|
|
|
9,790.0 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilmington Trust stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock: $1.00 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
330,000 5% cumulative shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
323.7 |
|
|
|
323.3 |
|
Common stock: $1.00 par value, authorized 150,000,000
shares, issued 100,234,596 in 2010 and 78,528,346 shares in 2009 |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
78.5 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
465.2 |
|
|
|
214.8 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,067.1 |
|
|
|
1,101.5 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(109.6 |
) |
|
|
(116.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributed capital and retained earnings |
|
|
1,846.6 |
|
|
|
1,601.8 |
|
Less: treasury stock: 9,036,627 shares in 2010 and 9,131,360
shares in 2009, at cost |
|
|
(292.6 |
) |
|
|
(295.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wilmington Trust stockholders equity |
|
|
1,554.0 |
|
|
|
1,306.7 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,554.0 |
|
|
|
1,307.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
10,622.1 |
|
|
$ |
11,097.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 2
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
91.4 |
|
|
$ |
102.9 |
|
Interest and dividends on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable interest |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Tax-exempt interest |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest on deposits in other banks |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Dividends on Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
117.1 |
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
Interest on short-term borrowings |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
78.5 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(77.4 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Advisory Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment advisory fees |
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Mutual fund fees |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Planning and other services |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wealth Advisory Services |
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
Corporate Client Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global corporate trust services |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Retirement services |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Investment/cash management services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate Client Services |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Roxbury Capital Management |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advisory fees |
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
|
Amortization of affiliate intangibles |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advisory fees after amortization of affiliate intangibles |
|
|
95.0 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Loan fees and late charges |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Card fees |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Securities gains, net of losses |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Amount of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes) |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in income |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
89.5 |
|
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and noninterest income |
|
$ |
86.8 |
|
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
Page 3
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
49.1 |
|
Incentives and bonuses |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Employment benefits |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Furniture, equipment, and supplies |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Advertising and contributions |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Servicing and consulting fees |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Subadvisor expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement services |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Other services |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Travel, entertainment, and training |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Originating and processing fees |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Conversion errors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Legal and auditing fees |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Other noninterest expense |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
131.5 |
|
|
|
126.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS)/INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
|
33.1 |
|
Income tax (benefit)/expense |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(28.3 |
) |
|
|
21.9 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to Wilmington Trust Corporation |
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
21.8 |
|
Dividends and accretion on preferred stock |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(33.8 |
) |
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
76,465 |
|
|
|
68,945 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
76,465 |
|
|
|
68,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 4
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilmington Trust Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except share amounts) |
|
stock |
|
|
stock 1 |
|
|
surplus |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
loss 2 |
|
|
stock |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
323.3 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
$ |
214.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,101.5 |
|
|
$ |
(116.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(295.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,307.1 |
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
Other comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
Cash dividend paid: $0.01
per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Cash dividend paid on
preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Common stock issued
(21,706,250 shares issued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
251.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273.3 |
|
Common stock issued under
employment benefit plans
and to the Board of
Directors (102,757 shares
issued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Preferred stock discount
accretion |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury
stock (8,024 shares
acquired) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Decrease in noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
323.7 |
|
|
$ |
100.2 |
|
|
$ |
465.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,067.1 |
|
|
$ |
(109.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(292.6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,554.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
321.5 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
$ |
216.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,103.7 |
|
|
$ |
(84.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(301.7 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,334.1 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Cash dividend paid: $0.1725 per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Cash dividend paid on
preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Preferred stock discount
accretion |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued under
employment benefit plans
and to the Board of
Directors (193,159 shares
issued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Acquisition of treasury
stock (1,967 shares
acquired) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
322.0 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
$ |
213.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,110.3 |
|
|
$ |
(90.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(297.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,336.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Shares outstanding were 91,197,969 and 69,304,640 at March 31, 2010 and March 31,
2009, respectively |
|
2 |
|
See Note 3 for additional information on other comprehensive (loss)/income |
|
3 |
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to Wilmington Trust Corporation |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 5
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income before noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(28.3 |
) |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
Provision for depreciation and other amortization |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Amortization of discounts and premiums on investment securities available for sale |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Accretion of discounts and premiums on investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Tax refund received |
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Originations of residential mortgages |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
(79.3 |
) |
Gross proceeds from sales of residential mortgages |
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
80.4 |
|
Gains on sales of residential mortgages |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Securities (gains)/losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
Amortization of gain on interest rate floor |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Decrease/(increase) in other assets |
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
108.6 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
404.8 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
203.7 |
|
|
|
239.1 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(112.5 |
) |
|
|
(187.8 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Decrease in cash due to divestiture of Grant Tani Barash & Altman |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of residential mortgages |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
208.9 |
|
|
|
190.8 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
Dispositions of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
$ |
293.2 |
|
|
$ |
638.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in demand, savings, and interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
(394.6 |
) |
|
$ |
492.8 |
|
Net decrease in certificates of deposit |
|
|
(173.0 |
) |
|
|
(633.6 |
) |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(146.3 |
) |
|
|
(591.4 |
) |
Net increase in U.S. Treasury demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
274.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issuance costs |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Cash dividends |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
$ |
(445.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(761.0 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(44.6 |
) |
|
|
(107.3 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
383.4 |
|
|
|
476.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
338.8 |
|
|
$ |
369.4 |
|
Page 6
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the quarter for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
22.0 |
|
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to OREO 1 |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other real estate owned |
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 7
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. Accounting and reporting policies
We maintain our accounting records and prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and reporting practices prescribed for the banking
industry. Using these principles, we make subjective judgments about uncertainties and trends and
we make estimates and assumptions about the amounts we report in our financial statements and
notes, including amounts for revenue recognition, the reserve for loan losses, pension and other
benefit plans, stock-based employee compensation, investment securities valuations, goodwill
impairment, loan origination fees and costs, income taxes, and other items. We evaluate these
estimates on an ongoing basis.
The precision of these estimates and the likelihood of future changes are subject to various risks
and uncertainties, and depend on a number of assumptions, estimates, expectations, assessments of
potential developments, other underlying variables, and a range of possible outcomes.
Circumstances that differ significantly from our judgments and estimates could cause our actual
financial results to differ from our expectations.
Our financial results could be affected adversely by, among other things, changes in national or
regional economic conditions; changes in market interest rates; fluctuations in equity or fixed
income markets; changes in the market values of, or expected cash flows from, securities in our
investment portfolio; significant changes in banking laws or regulations; changes in accounting
policies, procedures, or guidelines; increased competition for business; higher-than-expected
credit losses; the effects of acquisitions; the effects of integrating acquired entities; a
substantial and permanent loss of either client accounts and/or assets under management at
Wilmington Trust and/or affiliate money managers Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn (CRM) and Roxbury Capital
Management (RCM); changes in the regulatory, judicial, legislative, or tax treatment of business
transactions; new litigation or developments in existing litigation; and economic uncertainty
created by unrest in other parts of the world.
Page 8
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
We may use the following abbreviations throughout this report:
|
|
|
ARB:
|
|
Accounting Research Bulletin |
|
|
|
ASC:
|
|
Accounting Standards Codification |
|
|
|
ASU:
|
|
Accounting Standards Update |
|
|
|
CPP:
|
|
U.S. Department of the Treasury Capital Purchase Program |
|
|
|
EITF:
|
|
Emerging Issues Task Force |
|
|
|
ESPP:
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
FASB:
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
|
|
|
FHLB:
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh |
|
|
|
FIN:
|
|
FASB Interpretation (Number) |
|
|
|
FOMC:
|
|
Federal Open Market Committee |
|
|
|
FRB:
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank |
|
|
|
FSP:
|
|
FASB Staff Position |
|
|
|
GAAP:
|
|
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles |
|
|
|
IRS:
|
|
Internal Revenue Service |
|
|
|
NYSE:
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
OTTI:
|
|
Other-than-temporarily impaired |
|
|
|
SEC:
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
|
|
SERP:
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
SFAS:
|
|
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards |
|
|
|
TARP:
|
|
U.S. Department of the Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program |
Throughout this report, we use net (loss)/income to mean net (loss)/income attributable to
Wilmington Trust Corporation.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Wilmington Trust Corporation, our
wholly owned subsidiaries, and the subsidiaries in which we are majority owner. We eliminate
intercompany balances and transactions in consolidation. For more information about our accounting
policies, read Note 2, Summary of significant accounting policies, in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Although we are majority owner of CRM, we do not consolidate its results because CRM owners retain
control over certain governance matters. We do not consolidate the results of RCM because we are
not majority owner and RCM
owners retain control over certain governance matters. For information on how we account for CRM,
RCM, and other subsidiaries and affiliates, read Note 4, Affiliates and acquisitions, in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 9
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
During the first quarter of 2010, we entered into an agreement with the principals of Grant Tani
Barash & Altman, LLC (GTBA) and related parties, pursuant to which we sold 80% of the limited
liability company interests in GTBA to those principals. The agreement also limited future profit
distributions to us. This transaction resulted in a $0.1 million net loss recorded in the 2010
first quarter. Prior to February 16, 2010, the date of this agreement, GTBAs results were
consolidated in our financial statements. During the period from January 1, 2010 to February 16,
2010, GTBAs contribution to our consolidated statement of income was approximately $2.6 million of
revenue (net of amortization), approximately $1.8 million of expense, and $0.9 million of
noncontrolling interest. As of February 16, 2010, GTBAs results have not been consolidated in our
financial statements. We account for our remaining ownership interest in GTBA under the cost method
of accounting. In 2009, GTBAs contribution to our consolidated statement of income was
approximately $13.5 million of revenue (net of amortization), approximately $12.0 million of
expense, and $0.4 million of noncontrolling interest.
We have applied our critical accounting policies and estimation methods consistently in all periods
presented in this report and we have discussed these policies with our Audit Committee. The
information in this report has not been audited. It includes all adjustments of a normal recurring
nature that we believe are necessary for fair presentation. We have reclassified certain
prior-year amounts to conform to the current-year presentation. The consolidated financial
statements in this report should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
2. Stock-based compensation plans
The Compensation Committee and the Select Committee of our Board of Directors administer a
long-term incentive plan, an executive incentive plan, an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP), and
a directors deferred fee plan. We account for our stock-based compensation plans in accordance
with ASC 718, Stock Compensation. For
more information about these plans and how we determine valuations of stock-based awards, read Note
19, Stock-based compensation plans, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The common shares we issue as stock-based compensation come from our treasury, which held
approximately 9.0 million shares at March 31, 2010. This is more than adequate to meet the share
requirements of our current stock-based compensation plans.
Page 10
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock options |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Restricted common stock |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
Tax benefit |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income effect |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Stock option valuation assumptions |
|
2010 |
|
20091 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.23% - 3.72% |
|
|
|
|
Volatility of Corporations common stock |
|
34.06% - 44.50% |
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
1.42% - 2.96% |
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options |
|
4.6 to 8.7 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
We granted no stock options during the first quarter of 2009. |
For the valuation assumptions in the table above:
|
|
We use the Black-Scholes valuation method. |
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is the U.S. Treasury rate commensurate with the expected life
of options on the date of each grant. |
|
|
We based the volatility of our stock on historical volatility over a span of time equal to
the expected life of the options. |
|
|
We based the expected life of stock option awards on historical experience. Expected life
is the period of time we estimate that granted stock options will remain outstanding. |
Stock-based compensation expense for incentive stock options and the ESPP affects our income tax
expense and effective tax rate, because we are not allowed a tax deduction unless the award
recipient or ESPP subscriber makes a disqualifying disposition upon exercise. As a participant in
the CPP, we may not deduct compensation of more than $500,000 paid to any named executive officer
identified in our proxy statement for any year in which the U.S. Treasury holds any debt or equity
security we issued to the U.S. Treasury under the CPP.
No stock options were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009.
Page 11
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Long-term incentive plan option activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
average |
|
|
average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
intrinsic value |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
options |
|
|
price |
|
|
contractual term |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
7,432,171 |
|
|
$ |
31.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
708,500 |
|
|
$ |
12.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(369,777 |
) |
|
$ |
26.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(13,200 |
) |
|
$ |
36.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
7,757,694 |
|
|
$ |
30.19 |
|
|
5.9 years |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
4,958,772 |
|
|
$ |
36.17 |
|
|
4.2 years |
|
$ |
|
|
Unvested stock options
At March 31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested common stock options
was $4.8 million, which we expect to record over a weighted average period of 1.8 years. Stock
options awarded since we became a participant in the CPP do not vest until the stated vesting
period or, in certain circumstances, until the U.S. Treasury no longer holds any debt or equity
securities we issued under the CPP, whichever is later.
Restricted common stock grants
We measure the fair value of restricted common stock by the last sale price of our common stock on
the grant date. We amortize the value of restricted stock grants into stock-based compensation
expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. At March
31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock grants was $4.1 million,
which we expect to record over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
Under our incentive plans, the vesting period for some of our restricted stock awards can
accelerate upon retirement and in certain other circumstances. When we award restricted stock to
people from whom we may not receive services in the future, such as those who are eligible for
retirement, we recognize the expense of restricted stock grants when we make the award, instead of
amortizing the expense over the vesting period of the award. In the first quarter of 2010, we
recorded $0.5 million of expense for restricted stock grants. Restricted stock awarded to certain
officers since we became a participant in the CPP does not vest until the stated vesting period or
until the U.S. Treasury no longer holds any debt or equity securities we issued under the CPP,
whichever is later.
Page 12
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Restricted common stock activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Weighted average fair |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
common shares |
|
|
value at grant date |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
417,009 |
|
|
$ |
18.36 |
|
Granted |
|
|
102,757 |
|
|
$ |
13.38 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(40,158 |
) |
|
$ |
22.23 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
479,608 |
|
|
$ |
16.97 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan (ESPP)
For the ESPP, we record stock-based compensation expense based on the fair value of plan
participants options to purchase shares, amortized over the plans fiscal year. We use the
Black-Scholes method to determine the fair value of these options. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, total recognized compensation cost related to the ESPP was $0.3 million and total
unrecognized compensation cost related to this plan was $0.1 million.
ESPP Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares reserved for |
|
|
Subscriptions |
|
|
Price per |
|
|
|
future subscriptions |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
share |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
709,842 |
|
|
|
90,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
88,360 |
|
|
|
(88,360 |
) |
|
$ |
27.67 |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
$ |
27.67 |
|
Subscriptions entered into on June 1, 2009 |
|
|
(285,745 |
) |
|
|
285,745 |
|
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
34,602 |
|
|
|
(34,602 |
) |
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
547,059 |
|
|
|
251,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures |
|
|
21,851 |
|
|
|
(21,851 |
) |
|
$ |
12.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
568,910 |
|
|
|
229,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 13
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
3. Comprehensive (loss)/income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income before noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(28.3 |
) |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on securities, net of taxes of $1.0 and $0.0 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains included in net income,
net of taxes of $(0.1) and $(2.8) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Non-credit portion of
OTTI held-to-maturity investment
securities recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI), net of taxes of
$(4.3) and $0.0 |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accretion of
non-credit portion of OTTI investment securities losses that were
previously recognized in OCI, net of taxes of $(0.1) and $0.0 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses recorded previously at the time of
transfer to held-to-maturity, net of taxes of $2.2 and $0.0 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
adjustment of current period other-than-temporary impairment that was
previously recognized in OCI, net of taxes of $6.1 and $0.0 |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification from accumulated OCI into earnings of discounted cash
flow hedges, net of taxes of $(0.7) and $(1.4) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(0.6) and $(0.2) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
SERP1 liability adjustment, net of taxes of $0.1 and $0.7 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes of $0.0 and $0.0 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss)/income before the noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(21.6 |
) |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss)/income attributable to Wilmington Trust Corporation |
|
$ |
(22.5 |
) |
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Supplemental executive retirement plan |
Page 14
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
4. Earnings per share
Computation of basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income |
|
$ |
(29.2 |
) |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
Dividends and accretion on preferred stock |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(33.8 |
) |
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
Dilutive common shares from employee stock options,
unvested restricted stock, ESPP subscriptions, and stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted common shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss)/income per common share |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Diluted (loss)/income per common share1 |
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.1725 |
|
Anti-dilutive equity instruments excluded from calculation |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
To calculate diluted earnings per share, we applied the two-class method under the
assumption that all potentially dilutive securities other than the unvested restricted stock
had been exercised. For the purposes of this calculation, dilutive shares were determined in
accordance with the treasury method. |
5. Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities
In accordance with ASC 825, Financial Instruments, we disclose the estimated fair values of
certain financial instruments, whether or not we recognize them at fair value in our Consolidated
Statements of Condition. This note summarizes the methods and assumptions we use to estimate fair
value.
Fair value generally is the exchange price on which a willing buyer and a willing seller would
agree when market conditions are not distressed. Because of the uncertainties inherent in
determining fair value, fair value estimates may not be precise. Many of our fair value estimates
are based on highly subjective judgments and assumptions we make about market information and
economic conditions. Changes in market interest rates or any of the assumptions underlying our
estimates could cause those estimates to change significantly.
We do not believe that the aggregate fair value amounts presented in this Note offer a full
assessment of our consolidated financial condition, our ability to generate net income, or the
value of our company, because the fair value amounts presented here do not consider any value that
may accrue from existing client relationships or our
ability to create value by making loans, gathering deposits, or providing fee-based services. In
addition, the amounts presented here do not include the values of nonfinancial assets and
liabilities or intangible assets.
Page 15
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
We measure the fair values of assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the
factors (inputs) used to calculate the fair value of assets and liabilities:
|
|
Level 1. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices, such as NYSE closing prices,
in active markets for identical assets. Level 1 is the highest priority in the hierarchy. |
|
|
Level 2. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, as well as other significant inputs that are observable at
commonly quoted intervals, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves. |
|
|
Level 3. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs. Typically, our own assumptions
determine these inputs, since there is little, if any, related market activity. Level 3 is
the lowest priority in the hierarchy. |
If we use multiple input levels to calculate the fair value of an asset or liability, then the
lowest-level significant input determines the level for the entire fair value measurement of that
asset or liability. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and it considers factors specific to the asset or
liability.
In accordance with GAAP, we may be required to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments typically relate to lower-of-cost or fair value
accounting, or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment.
The following paragraphs summarize how we determine fair values and the inputs we use to calculate
fair values.
Cash and due from banks, short-term investments, accrued interest receivable, short-term
borrowings, and accrued interest payable. Since these instruments have short maturities, their
fair values are approximately the same as their carrying values.
Investment securities. We review our debt and equity investment securities at least
quarterly to determine their fair values. The key determinants of fair value are market interest
rates, credit spreads, and investor perceptions. When
market interest rates rise or credit spreads widen, the fair values of debt and equity securities
typically decline and unrealized losses increase. Conversely, when market interest rates fall or
credit spreads tighten, the fair values of debt and equity securities typically increase. As a
securitys fair value rises, unrealized losses may decrease or unrealized gains may increase.
Page 16
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
To determine the fair values of most of our investment securities, we consider a variety of factors
and use criteria specified by the SEC and FASB. We use financial market data, credit data, cash
flow projections, and other analytics generated internally and by third parties. Where possible,
we draw parallels from the trades and quotes of securities with similar features. If these
parallels are not available, we base fair value on the market prices of comparable instruments as
quoted by broker-dealers, with adjustments for maturity dates, underlying assets, credit ratings,
and other items, if necessary.
To estimate the fair value of our collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed debt
securities, we use a market approach based on the quoted prices of similar issues. To estimate the
fair value of our obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal bonds), we use a
market approach based on the quoted prices of similar issues and index rates, taking into account
any estimated prepayment rates. Sector spread, credit rating spread, and coupon structure spread
adjustments are then made to the quoted prices of these similar issues and index rates. To
estimate the fair value of our government agency securities, we use a market approach based on the
quoted price of the issue or, if this is not available, the quoted price of a similar issue. To
estimate the fair value of our preferred stocks, we use a market approach based on the quoted price
of the stock.
Because the market for pooled trust preferred securities (TruPS) remains illiquid, we use mainly
Level 3 inputs obtained from brokers or third-party advisors to determine the fair value of these
securities. We also use an internal model that reflects liquidity and credit risk to discount cash
flow projections provided by the third-party advisors.
The base cash flow for these calculations is the remaining expected future cash flow of each pooled
TruPS, based on its contractual terms, and adjusted for current and expected future defaults. We
adjust our default assumptions each quarter based on, among other factors, the current financial
sector environment, developments related to the financial institutions whose securities underlie
the pooled TruPS, and estimates of loss severity. We also adjust the discount rate for appropriate
risk premiums, including liquidity risk and credit risk. Based on changes in certain yield curves
related to the financial sector, and other factors, we estimate the associated risk premium for
each individual security and adjust its discount rate accordingly.
While estimating fair values and the inputs to fair value calculations in illiquid markets is
inherently uncertain, we believe that our methodology applies assumptions that market participants
would find relevant, and provides the best estimate of fair value at each reporting period.
For more information about our investment securities, read Note 10, Investment securities, in
this report.
Page 17
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
FHLB and FRB stock. The fair value of FHLB and FRB stock is assumed to equal its cost
basis, since the stock is nonmarketable but redeemable at its par value.
Derivative financial instruments. We base the fair value estimates of derivative
instruments on pricing models that use assumptions about market conditions and risks that are
current as of the reporting date.
For our interest rate swaps, we obtain data on interest rates from an independent third-party
advisor. We use data provided by this advisor to determine the fair values of our interest rate
swaps by using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts
(or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). We base the
variable cash payments (or receipts) on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves)
derived from observable market interest rate curves.
To comply with ASC 820, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to reflect both our
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk. In adjusting the fair
value of our derivative contracts for the effects of nonperformance risk, we consider the effect of
netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual
puts, and guarantees.
Most of the inputs we use to value our swap contracts are Level 2 inputs. For credit valuation
adjustments, we use some Level 3 inputs, such as internal estimates of current credit spreads for
our swap clients, to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties. For more
information about our use of derivatives, read Note 6, Derivative and hedging activities, in this
report.
At times, we may use interest rate swaps and floors, primarily to hedge the interest rate risk
associated with floating rate commercial loans and subordinated long-term debt. In accordance with
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging,
the estimated fair values of these instruments represent the amounts we would have expected to
receive or pay to terminate such agreements.
Loans. To determine the fair values of loans that are not impaired, we employ discounted
cash flow analyses that use interest rates and terms similar to those currently being offered to
borrowers. This methodology is consistent with the guidance in ASC 825-10-55-3, and we believe our
disclosures provide a fair value that is more indicative of an entry price. We do not record loans
at fair value on a recurring basis. We record fair value adjustments to loans on a nonrecurring
basis to reflect full and partial charge-offs due to impairment. For impaired loans, we use a
variety of techniques to measure fair value, such as using the current appraised value of the
collateral, discounting the contractual cash flows, and analyzing market data that we may adjust
due to the specific characteristics of the loan or collateral.
Page 18
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Deposits. The fair values of demand deposits equal the amount payable on demand as of the
reporting date. The carrying amounts for variable rate deposits approximate their fair values as
of the reporting date. To estimate the fair values of fixed rate CDs, we use a discounted cash
flow analysis that incorporates prevailing market rates for CDs with comparable maturities.
Long-term debt. Under the guidance of ASU 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,
we base the fair value of long-term debt on recent market activity in our own debt issuances.
Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. The fair values of loan commitments
and letters of credit approximate the fees we charge for providing these services.
Carrying values and estimated fair values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in millions) |
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
188.2 |
|
|
$ |
188.2 |
|
|
$ |
202.9 |
|
|
$ |
202.9 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
150.6 |
|
|
|
150.6 |
|
|
|
180.5 |
|
|
|
180.5 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
765.0 |
|
|
|
759.9 |
|
|
|
860.5 |
|
|
|
849.4 |
|
FHLB and FRB stock |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
Loans, net of reserves |
|
|
8,415.8 |
|
|
|
8,335.0 |
|
|
|
8,715.7 |
|
|
|
8,579.6 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
7,823.3 |
|
|
$ |
7,894.7 |
|
|
$ |
8,390.9 |
|
|
$ |
8,459.5 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
457.5 |
|
|
|
457.5 |
|
|
|
603.8 |
|
|
|
603.8 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
443.5 |
|
|
|
434.1 |
|
|
|
442.9 |
|
|
|
432.2 |
|
Page 19
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Fair values measured on a recurring basis
To determine fair values measured on a recurring basis in the first quarter of 2010:
|
|
We used Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for investment securities. To determine the proper
level of detail for disclosure, we considered the nature of each type of security listed and
its associated risk, as well as its industry sector, vintage, geographic concentration, credit
quality, and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
We used Level 2 inputs for interest rate swap contracts. Credit valuation adjustments did
not significantly change the overall valuation of these contracts. |
|
|
|
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the
first quarter of 2010. |
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markets for |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
identical |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
instruments |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
Government agency securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.7 |
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by residential mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Mortgage-backed debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
188.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188.8 |
|
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
Small financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Other marketable equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other marketable equity
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available for sale |
|
|
242.0 |
|
|
|
416.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
658.1 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
|
$ |
461.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
703.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
Page 20
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Fair values measured on a nonrecurring basis
To determine fair values measured on a nonrecurring basis in the first quarter of 2010:
|
|
For loans, we used Level 2 or Level 3 inputs, consisting principally of third party
appraisals, and the previously described techniques. Loan amounts are based mainly on the
lesser of the fair value of the loans collateral or the loan balance. Typically, loans
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis represent loans for which we have recorded a
partial charge-off in the current period. These amounts do not include fully charged-off
loans, because we carry fully charged-off loans at zero on our balance sheet. Also, according
to ASC 820, measurements for impaired loans that are determined using a present value
technique are not considered fair value measurements under the standard and, therefore, are
not included. Because an appraisal values the underlying collateral and not the specific
loan, and because the real estate market is not a consistent, active market for all property
types, we consider third party appraisals to meet the definition of Level 2 inputs as
described in ASC 820. Internal appraisals may be considered Level 2 or Level 3 inputs
depending on the factors used in the calculation. We make no adjustments to third party
appraised values, other than costs to sell, in estimating the fair value of the loans. |
|
|
|
For other real estate owned (OREO), we used Level 2 or Level 3 inputs, which consist of
appraisals or internal estimates of fair value. OREO is recorded on our balance sheet at the
lesser of the related loan balance or the fair value of the property, net of cost to sell,
when we obtain control of the property. Consistent with the discussion of loans above, we
consider third party appraisals to meet the definition of Level 2 inputs. |
|
|
|
For TruPS, we used Level 2 and Level 3 inputs, as continued illiquidity in the market for
these instruments made it difficult to determine their valuation. We obtained these inputs
from brokers along with cash flow projections from third-party advisors. We then used an
internal model that reflects liquidity and credit risk to discount cash flow projections
provided by the third-party advisors, as described earlier in this note. |
At March 31, 2010, all of our HTM investment securities with fair values measured on a nonrecurring
basis were OTTI TruPS. For more information about these securities, read Note 10, Investment
securities, in this report.
Page 21
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markets for |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
identical |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
instruments |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Investment securities held to
maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled trust-preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
$ |
29.3 |
|
|
$ |
57.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
6. Derivative and hedging activities
We may use derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swaps and floors, to help
manage (hedge) the effects that changes in market interest rates may have on net interest income,
the fair value of assets and liabilities, and cash flows. We do not hold or issue derivative
financial instruments for trading purposes. We account for derivative financial instruments in
accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and calculate their fair value in accordance
with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
As of March 31, 2010 we had:
|
|
A total notional amount of $1,488.4 million in interest rate swap contracts. |
|
|
|
No other derivative instruments. |
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Asset
derivatives recorded in other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability
derivatives recorded in other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
45.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
45.7 |
|
Page 22
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
We use interest rate swaps to allow commercial borrowers to manage their interest rate risk. When
we enter into an interest rate swap contract with a commercial loan client, we simultaneously enter
into a mirror swap contract with a third party (counterparty). We retain the credit risk
inherent in making a commercial loan. The swap with the counterparty effectively exchanges the
clients fixed rate loan payments for floating rate loan payments. These counterparties are large
international money center banks. Our arrangements with some of these counterparties require us to
post collateral when our swaps are in a liability position. When our derivatives are in an asset
position, we retain the credit risk that is associated with the potential failure of these
counterparties, and our arrangements with some of these counterparties allow us to request
collateral.
As of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
We had 141 client swap contracts with a total notional amount of $744.2 million and an
equal amount of mirror swap contracts with third-party financial institutions, for a
total notional amount of $1,488.4 million in swaps associated with loans to clients. |
|
|
|
|
All of our interest rate swaps were associated with commercial loan client activity. |
|
|
|
|
Most of our mirror counterparty swaps were in a liability position. |
We have
not designated our client swap contracts and the related
mirror swaps as hedging
instruments under ASC 815, and we have not applied hedge accounting to these instruments. We
record gains and losses associated with these contracts in our income statement in the other
noninterest income line. We do not offset amounts for the right to reclaim collateral (a
receivable) or the obligation to return collateral (a payable) against fair value amounts
recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty. At March 31, 2010, we
had a $10.2 million receivable for cash collateral we posted with our counterparties, compared to
$9.7 million at December 31, 2009.
Client swap contract gain/(loss) recognized in other noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts in an asset position |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
Interest rate swap contracts in a liability position |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Page 23
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
All of our mirror (non-client) swap derivative contracts have credit risk contingent features
that, if triggered, could require us to post collateral or make payments in full settlement of our
obligations to the third parties. Collateral requirements are based on contractual arrangements
and vary by counterparty. The amount of collateral we are required to post is based on:
1. |
|
The termination values (fair value excluding the credit valuation adjustment) of the swaps, |
|
2. |
|
Thresholds defined in the swap contracts, and |
|
3. |
|
The risk associated with the securities that we pledge, which may result in collateral
postings that exceed the termination values of the collateralized swaps. |
These credit risk contingent features include:
|
|
Cross-default provisions. We have agreements with each of our non-client swap derivative
counterparties that contain cross-default provisions. If we were to default on certain of our
obligations, independent of our swap obligations, then we could also be declared in default on
our derivative obligations and the swap arrangement could terminate. |
|
|
|
Credit rating contingent features resulting in a collateral call. We have agreements with
some of our non-client swap derivative counterparties that contain provisions which could
increase the amount of collateral we are required to post if certain credit rating agencies
downgrade our credit ratings. |
|
|
|
Credit rating contingent features resulting in swap termination. We have an agreement with
one of our non-client swap derivative counterparties that contains a provision under which a
decrease in our credit ratings to below investment grade could result in the termination of
the swap agreement by the counterparty. |
At March 31, 2010:
|
|
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent
features that were in a liability position was $46.7 million, for which we had posted
collateral of $52.1 million in cash and mortgage-related securities in the normal course of
business. |
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with cross-default provisions that
were in a liability position was $46.7 million. If all of our mirror swaps had terminated
on March 31, 2010, due to cross-default provisions, we could have been required to settle our
obligations under these agreements at their termination value of $46.7 million. At March 31,
2010, we had already posted $52.1 million as collateral with our counterparties. |
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with a collateral call provision
related to the credit rating contingent feature that were in a liability position was $40.1
million. Additional credit rating downgrades could have resulted in a maximum collateral call
of $0.6 million. |
|
|
|
The derivative instrument with a contingent feature resulting in a swap termination was in
a liability position. Its fair value was $1.3 million, and no collateral was posted. If this
swap had terminated on March 31, 2010, the credit rating contingent feature could have
required us to settle this arrangement at its termination value of $1.5 million. |
Page 24
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
At December 31, 2009:
|
|
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent
features that were in a liability position was $45.6 million, for which we had posted
collateral of $52.4 million in cash and mortgage-related securities in the normal course of
business. |
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with cross-default provisions that
were in a liability position was $45.6 million. If all of our mirror swaps had terminated
on December 31, 2009, due to cross-default provisions, we could have been required to settle
our obligations under these agreements at their termination value of $46.0 million. At
December 31, 2009, we had already posted $52.4 million as collateral with our counterparties. |
|
|
|
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with a collateral call provision
related to the credit rating contingent feature that were in a liability position was $39.4
million. Additional credit rating downgrades could have resulted in a maximum collateral call
of $4.0 million. |
|
|
|
The derivative instrument with a contingent feature resulting in a swap termination was in
a liability position. Its fair value was $1.2 million and no collateral was posted. If this
swap had terminated on December 31, 2009, the credit rating contingent feature could have
required us to settle this arrangement at its termination value of $1.3 million. |
We sold all of our interest rate floor contracts in January 2008. We realized a gain of $35.5
million on the sale of these contracts, which had a notional amount of $1.00 billion. We are
reclassifying this gain from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest and fees on loans
based on the remaining terms of the originally hedged portfolio of loans. These monthly
reclassifications began in February 2008 and will continue until July 2014.
We reclassified $2.1 million of this gain into income during the first three months of 2010.
Between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011, we expect to reclassify approximately $5.5 million of
pretax net gains, or approximately $3.6 million after tax, on discontinued cash flow hedges
reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. If we add other hedges, the amounts that we
actually recognize could differ from these estimates.
For more information about our derivative and hedging activities and how we account for them, read
Note 2, Summary of significant accounting policies, and Note 15, Derivative and hedging
activities, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information about fair values of
derivatives, read Note 5, Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities, in this report, as
well as Note 14, Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities, in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Page 25
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
7. Reserve for loan losses
Changes in the reserve for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
251.5 |
|
|
$ |
157.1 |
|
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
Commercial real estate construction loans |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Consumer and other retail loans |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged off |
|
$ |
(30.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.1 |
) |
Recoveries on loans previously charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Consumer and other retail loans |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Net loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans |
|
$ |
(7.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
Commercial real estate construction loans |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Consumer and other retail loans |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans charged off |
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(21.2 |
) |
Transfers from reserve for lending commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Provision charged to operations |
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for loan losses at end of period |
|
$ |
299.8 |
|
|
$ |
167.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for lending commitments in other liabilities |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
Page 26
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Period-end investment recorded in impaired
loans subject to a reserve for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 reserve: $98.6 |
|
$ |
311.7 |
|
|
$ |
351.5 |
|
2009 reserve: $88.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end investment in impaired loans
requiring no reserve for loan losses |
|
$ |
205.1 |
|
|
$ |
148.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end investment recorded in impaired loans |
|
$ |
516.8 |
|
|
$ |
499.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end investment recorded in impaired
loans classified as nonaccruing 1 |
|
$ |
468.9 |
|
|
$ |
455.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period-end investment recorded in impaired
loans classified as troubled restructured debt
(accruing) |
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Includes loans that are classified
as troubled debt restructuring that are
nonaccruing |
|
$ |
116.7 |
|
|
$ |
116.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Average investment recorded in impaired loans |
|
$ |
515.9 |
|
|
$ |
241.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized using the cash
basis method of income recognition |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
Page 27
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
8. Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
(in millions) |
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
amount |
|
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
amount |
|
Goodwill (nonamortizing) |
|
$ |
389.4 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
$ |
359.6 |
|
|
$ |
393.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
$ |
363.2 |
|
Other intangibles
(amortizing): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
Client lists |
|
|
62.4 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
73.7 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangibles |
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
44.8 |
1 |
|
$ |
34.2 |
|
|
$ |
90.1 |
|
|
$ |
49.9 |
1 |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
The change in accumulated amortization during the first quarter, included a decrease of $0.3 million due to foreign
currency translation adjustments and a decrease of $7.1 million due to the reduction in ownership of GTBA. |
Amortization expense of other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense of other intangible assets |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Future amortization expense of other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated annual
amortization
expense of other
intangible assets |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
The goodwill from acquisitions recorded during the first quarter of 2010 consists of $0.1 million
in connection with the 2008 acquisition of AST Capital Trust Company. Additionally, during the
2010 first quarter, we reduced our ownership position in GTBA, resulting in a $2.7 million
reduction of goodwill and an $11.0 million reduction of other intangible assets.
Carrying amount of goodwill by business segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional |
|
|
Advisory |
|
|
Client |
|
|
Money |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Banking |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Managers |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
131.8 |
|
|
$ |
84.7 |
|
|
$ |
142.9 |
|
|
$ |
363.2 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Decrease in carrying value
due to reduction in
ownership of GTBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Decrease in carrying value
due to foreign currency
translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
129.1 |
|
|
$ |
83.8 |
|
|
$ |
142.9 |
|
|
$ |
359.6 |
|
Page 28
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Changes in other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Residual |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Residual |
|
|
amortization |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
assigned |
|
|
value |
|
|
period |
|
|
assigned |
|
|
value |
|
|
period |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
8 years |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
8 years |
Decrease in carrying
value of client lists
due to foreign currency
translation adjustments |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in carrying
value due to reduction
in ownership of GTBA |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in other
intangible assets |
|
$ |
(11.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about goodwill and other intangible assets, read Note 2, Summary of
significant accounting policies, and Note 10, Goodwill and other intangible assets, in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
9. Components of net periodic benefit cost
We offer a pension plan, a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), and a postretirement
benefit plan for which we record net periodic benefit costs. For more information about these
plans, read Note 18, Pension and other postretirement benefits, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
|
SERP benefits |
|
|
benefits |
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Recognized actuarial losses |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Expected annual contribution |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 29
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
10. Investment securities
We maintain an investment securities portfolio to generate cash flow, to help manage interest rate
risk, and to provide collateral for deposits and other liabilities. We do not invest in securities
for trading purposes. There are no client funds in this portfolio.
Our investment securities portfolio consists of:
|
|
Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury. |
|
|
|
Discount notes and other securities issued by other U.S. government agencies, including the
Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), Federal National Mortgage Association
(Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the Federal Home
Loan Bank System. |
|
|
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions, which primarily are bonds issued by the
state of Delaware and municipalities in Delaware. |
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations issued by Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae, in which the underlying collateral consists of adjustable rate
and/or fixed rate residential mortgages. As of March 31, 2010, there were no subprime
mortgages in the underlying collateral of these securities. |
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities, including single-issue and pooled trust-preferred securities
(TruPS) issued by financial institutions. |
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock, which consists of securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,
and three other financial institutions. |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. government agency securities and small amounts of other types of marketable debt
and equity securities. |
Numerous factors affect the valuations at which we record these securities on our balance sheet,
including market interest rates, credit spreads, and investor perceptions. We review the
securities in our investment portfolio at least quarterly in order to determine their fair value,
which can be equal to, more than, or less than their amortized cost. To determine a securitys
fair value, we use a variety of techniques and consult with third-party valuation experts. For
more information about the key determinants of a securitys fair value, read Note 5, Fair value
measurement of assets and liabilities, in this report.
Page 30
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
We classify investment securities in one of two categories:
1. |
|
Available-for-sale (AFS). This means we have the ability to hold the security, but we may
elect to sell it, depending on our needs. |
|
2. |
|
Held-to-maturity (HTM). This means we have not only the ability, but also the intent, to
retain the security on our books until it matures. |
AFS securities are carried at their estimated fair value. When the fair value of an AFS security
exceeds its book value, we record an unrealized gain as a change in stockholders equity through
accumulated other comprehensive income. This increases stockholders equity. It does not affect
earnings.
HTM securities are carried at their amortized cost. When the fair value of an HTM security exceeds
its amortized cost, we disclose the change as an unrealized gain in the investment securities
footnotes that accompany our financial statements. There is no corresponding change to
stockholders equity, earnings, or our financial statements.
When a securitys fair value falls below its book value, it is considered impaired, and we are
required to assess whether it is temporarily impaired or OTTI. To determine whether a security is
temporarily impaired or OTTI, we consider factors that include:
|
|
Whether the present value of cash flows we expect to collect is less than the amortized
cost basis of the security. |
|
|
|
The causes of the decline in fair value, such as credit problems, interest rate
fluctuations, industry conditions, and/or market volatility. |
|
|
|
The severity and duration of the decline in the securitys fair value (from its amortized
cost basis). |
|
|
|
The security issuers ability to make scheduled interest or principal payments. |
|
|
|
Changes made by credit rating agencies to the credit rating of the security or its issuer. |
|
|
|
Whether we intend to sell the security or hold it until it recovers in value, matures, or
is called. |
|
|
|
Whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before it
recovers its amortized cost basis. |
When we classify a security as temporarily impaired, it means we believe the securitys valuation
decline (impairment) is primarily a function of short-term financial market forces. When we
classify a security as OTTI, it means we believe that conditions in addition to financial market
forces have contributed to its valuation decline.
Under ASC 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, if we do not intend to sell a debt
security, and if it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security, we
must separate other-than-temporary impairments into two amounts, each of which is accounted for
differently:
1. |
|
A portion related to credit loss. This portion is recognized in earnings as an impairment
loss. |
|
2. |
|
A portion related to all other factors. This portion is recognized in comprehensive income,
net of taxes. |
Page 31
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The credit related portion of an other-than-temporary impairment is defined as the difference
between the securitys amortized cost (the securitys carrying value plus any previous
other-than-temporary impairment recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income) and the present
value of the securitys expected future cash flows. We base our calculations of a securitys
expected cash flows on its contractual terms, discounted at a rate equal to the effective interest
rate implicit when we acquired the security. We adjust the expected cash flows of each security
for current and expected defaults each quarter.
For the pooled TruPS in our portfolio, we use a third party to help us calculate estimated future
cash flows using default/deferral assumptions based upon an analysis of the creditworthiness of
every underlying issuer in each pool. In assessing creditworthiness, we consider each issuers
capital strength, liquidity position, stock price, credit risk exposure, and credit rating, as well
as other financial measures. We believe that our methodology provides us the best estimate of the
expected future cash flows for each of these securities.
In the 2010 first quarter, 23 of the 38 pooled TruPS in our investment securities portfolio were
determined to be OTTI, which resulted in an impairment loss of $29.8 million. Of this amount, $17.9
million was related to credit quality and was recorded as an other-than-temporary impairment loss
in the statement of income. The $17.9 million credit-related loss was caused by continued
deterioration in the credit quality of the institutions whose preferred stock underlie the pooled
TruPS that we own. The remaining $11.9 million noncredit-related portion of the write-down reduced
stockholders equity by $7.6 million on an after-tax basis and was recorded in other comprehensive
income. In addition to the $17.9 million OTTI pooled TruPS loss, a $0.1 million loss was recorded
on an available-for-sale equity security that was determined to be OTTI in the 2010 first quarter.
This compares to a $4.5 million other-than-temporary impairment charge in the first quarter of
2009. The 2009 charge consisted of a $3.9 million other-than-temporary impairment on a mutual fund
investment, and a $0.6 million other-than-temporary impairment on a pooled TruPS. The $0.6 million
other-than-temporary impairment on the
TruPS was subsequently reclassified to accumulated other comprehensive income in the second quarter
of 2009 with the adoption of FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, which was incorporated into ASC
320.
Credit loss roll forward
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
97.6 |
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
Credit
losses for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Additional
credit losses for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
Page 32
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in millions) |
|
cost |
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
Government agency securities |
|
|
146.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
146.7 |
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by residential mortgages |
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Mortgage-backed debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
180.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188.8 |
|
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large financial institutions |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
Small financial institutions |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Other marketable equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other marketable equity securities |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
644.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
658.1 |
|
Amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in millions) |
|
cost |
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
233.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
232.8 |
|
Government agency securities |
|
|
224.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
224.6 |
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by residential mortgages |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
Mortgage-backed debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
195.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203.4 |
|
Preferred stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large financial institutions |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Small financial institutions |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
Other marketable equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other marketable equity securities |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
735.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
747.6 |
|
Page 33
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Amortized cost, carrying value, and fair value of held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in millions) |
|
cost |
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
value |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Investment securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Corporate debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-issue trust-preferreds |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
51.3 |
|
Pooled trust-preferreds |
|
|
130.5 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate debt securities |
|
|
188.4 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
100.1 |
|
Non-U.S. government agency debt
securities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to
maturity |
|
$ |
190.0 |
|
|
$ |
83.1 |
|
|
$ |
106.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
|
$ |
101.8 |
|
Amortized cost, carrying value, and fair value of held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
recognized |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in millions) |
|
cost |
|
|
in OCI |
|
|
value |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Investment securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Corporate debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-issue trust-preferreds |
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
48.5 |
|
Pooled trust-preferreds |
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate debt securities |
|
|
199.0 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
99.9 |
|
Non-U.S. government agency debt
securities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to
maturity |
|
$ |
200.9 |
|
|
$ |
88.0 |
|
|
$ |
112.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
(14.1 |
) |
|
$ |
101.8 |
|
Temporarily impaired securities
When a security is determined to be temporarily impaired, and there is an associated unrealized
loss, the securitys accounting treatment depends on whether it is classified as AFS or HTM.
For temporarily impaired AFS securities, we are required to:
|
|
Report the amount of the impairment as an unrealized loss. |
|
|
|
Record the unrealized loss as a reduction in stockholders equity through accumulated other
comprehensive income. |
This reduces stockholders equity. It does not affect earnings.
Page 34
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
For temporarily impaired HTM securities, we are required to disclose the amount of the decline in
fair value in a footnote disclosure, not as a change in stockholders equity. This has no effect
on our financial statements or earnings.
A continued downturn in the financial markets could cause us to reassess whether any or all of
these securities remain temporarily impaired, or if any or all of them should be deemed OTTI.
Temporarily impaired securities as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fewer than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
(in millions) |
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
Government agency securities |
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Corporate debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-issue trust-preferreds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Pooled trust-preferreds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
(85.2 |
) |
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
(85.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
(91.9 |
) |
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
(91.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
96.2 |
|
|
$ |
(91.9 |
) |
|
$ |
150.8 |
|
|
$ |
(92.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporarily impaired securities as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fewer than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
(in millions) |
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
206.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
206.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
Government agency securities |
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Corporate debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-issue trust-preferreds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Pooled trust-preferreds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
(92.9 |
) |
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
(92.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
(102.1 |
) |
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
(102.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
295.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
99.9 |
|
|
$ |
(102.1 |
) |
|
$ |
395.7 |
|
|
$ |
(103.1 |
) |
Trust-preferred securities
Our TruPS portfolio consists of 38 pooled issues and 9 single-issue securities. The single-issue
TruPS are from money center and large regional banks. The pooled instruments include securities
issued by banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. Our positions in pooled
TruPS generally are secured by over-collateralization or default protections provided by
subordinated tranches.
All of our TruPS are recorded on our balance sheet as investment securities held to maturity and as
corporate debt securities in the footnote disclosures.
Page 35
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
As discussed previously in this note, we determined that some of our pooled TruPS were OTTI in
2008, 2009, and in the first quarter of 2010. To date:
|
|
We have recorded other-than-temporary impairment write-downs on 32 of the 38 pooled TruPS
in our portfolio. |
|
|
|
We have not recorded other-than-temporary impairment write-downs on any of the 9
single-issue TruPS in our portfolio. |
Illiquidity persists in the market for TruPS. Consequently, determining their estimated fair
values requires substantial judgment and the use of factors that are difficult to estimate. Future
changes in the creditworthiness of the underlying financial institutions, market conditions, and
other factors could cause us to determine that more of our TruPS are OTTI. Such determinations
would require us to record additional write-downs in TruPS values, and additional impairment losses
for the portions of any write-downs that are related to credit losses.
For more information on our TruPS portfolio valuations, see the disclosures of amortized cost,
carrying value, and fair value of held-to-maturity securities that appear earlier in this note.
Other matters
At March 31, 2010, securities with an aggregate book value of $325.6 million were pledged to secure
public deposits, short-term borrowings, demand notes issued to the U.S. Treasury, FHLB borrowings,
repurchase agreements, and interest rate swap agreements, and for other purposes required by law.
We had investments in the securities of regulatory authorities that totaled $26.8 million at March
31, 2010, and $26.8 million at December 31, 2009. These securities are carried at cost.
Page 36
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Contractual maturities of debt securities available for sale at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 year |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
through 5 |
|
|
through 10 |
|
|
After 10 |
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
or less |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Total |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
237.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
Government agency securities |
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146.6 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by residential mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
180.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortized cost of debt securities
available for sale |
|
$ |
321.6 |
|
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
$ |
164.0 |
|
|
$ |
67.1 |
|
|
$ |
617.3 |
|
Fair value of debt securities available for sale |
|
$ |
321.6 |
|
|
$ |
65.1 |
|
|
$ |
171.6 |
|
|
$ |
69.2 |
|
|
$ |
627.5 |
|
Weighted average yield of debt securities
available for sale 1 |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Weighted average yields are not on a tax-equivalent basis |
Contractual maturities of debt securities held to maturity at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 year |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
through 5 |
|
|
through 10 |
|
|
After 10 |
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
or less |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Total |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Corporate debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-issue trust-preferreds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
Pooled trust-preferreds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
Non-U.S. government agency debt securities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value of debt securities held
to maturity |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
105.3 |
|
|
$ |
106.9 |
|
Fair value of debt securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
|
$ |
101.8 |
|
Weighted average yield of debt securities held
to maturity 1 |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Weighted average yields are not on a tax-equivalent basis |
Page 37
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Sale and write-down of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Proceeds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103.2 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by residential mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.8 |
|
Mortgage-backed debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197.8 |
|
Other marketable equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total proceeds |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
404.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains realized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by residential mortgages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Mortgage-backed debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Other marketable equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains realized |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other marketable equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other marketable equity securities |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary
impairment charges |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
For more information about our investment securities portfolio, read Note 6, Investment
securities, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information about how we account for
investment securities, read Note 5, Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities, in this
report, as well as Note 2, Summary of significant accounting policies, Note 14, Fair value
measurement of assets and liabilities, and Note 21, Accumulated other comprehensive income, in
our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 38
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
11. Borrowings
Our total short term borrowings consist of Federal funds purchased, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and an advance from the FHLB.
Our long term debt at March 31, 2010 was $443.5 million. This amount included:
|
|
Two issuances of subordinated debt, totaling $450 million, summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount issued and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiannual |
|
|
payment |
|
|
|
|
Issue date |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
payment dates |
|
|
rates |
|
|
Maturity |
|
April 4, 2003 |
|
$ |
250.0 |
|
|
10 years |
|
April 15 and October 15 |
|
|
4.875 |
% |
|
April 15, 2013 |
April 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
10 years |
|
April 1 and October 1 |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
April 2, 2018 |
|
|
$(5.6) million of unamortized losses related to terminated interest rate swaps on long-term
debt. |
|
|
|
$(0.1) million of unamortized discounts on the $250.0 million of subordinated long-term
debt that matures on April 15, 2013. |
|
|
|
$(0.8) million of unamortized discounts on the $200.0 million of subordinated long-term
debt that matures on April 2, 2018. |
None of our long-term debt is redeemable prior to maturity or subject to any sinking fund.
For more information on our borrowings, read Note 12, Borrowings, in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
12. Capital
In March 2010, we completed an underwritten public offering of 21,706,250 shares of common stock.
The offering was priced at $13.25 per share and raised $274.0 million, net of $13.7 million of
underwriting discounts and commissions. The proceeds qualify as both tangible common equity and
regulatory Tier 1 capital.
U.S. regulatory capital ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
Well-capitalized |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
minimum |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
Total
capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilmington Trust Corporation |
|
|
17.58 |
% |
|
$ |
1,807.1 |
|
|
|
14.31 |
% |
|
$ |
1,568.8 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
$ |
1,028.2 |
|
Wilmington Trust Company |
|
|
13.79 |
% |
|
$ |
1,270.6 |
|
|
|
11.39 |
% |
|
$ |
1,127.4 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
$ |
921.1 |
|
Wilmington Trust FSB |
|
|
12.44 |
% |
|
$ |
160.0 |
|
|
|
12.08 |
% |
|
$ |
174.0 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
$ |
128.3 |
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilmington Trust Corporation |
|
|
12.90 |
% |
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
|
9.86 |
% |
|
$ |
1,080.1 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
$ |
616.9 |
|
Wilmington Trust Company |
|
|
12.51 |
% |
|
$ |
1,152.1 |
|
|
|
10.11 |
% |
|
$ |
1,001.1 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
$ |
552.6 |
|
Wilmington Trust FSB |
|
|
11.18 |
% |
|
$ |
143.4 |
|
|
|
10.83 |
% |
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
$ |
77.0 |
|
Tier 1
leverage capital (to average
assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilmington Trust Corporation |
|
|
12.25 |
% |
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
|
10.10 |
% |
|
$ |
1,080.1 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
541.5 |
|
Wilmington Trust Company |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
$ |
1,152.1 |
|
|
|
10.64 |
% |
|
$ |
1,001.1 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
480.4 |
|
Wilmington Trust FSB |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
$ |
143.4 |
|
|
|
7.49 |
% |
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
112.5 |
|
Page 39
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
13. Income taxes
Income taxes and tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Pre-tax (loss)/income (less non-controlling interest) |
|
$ |
(45.6 |
) |
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
Income tax (benefit)/expense |
|
$ |
(16.4 |
) |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
35.96 |
% |
|
|
33.94 |
% |
At March 31, 2010, we had a valuation allowance of $2.1 million for deferred tax assets. This $2.1
million was for the likelihood that one of our subsidiaries will not have future taxable income.
If this subsidiary does have income, we will reverse a portion of the valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets accordingly.
Under ASC 740, Income Taxes, we recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions as income tax expense. We have reviewed and, where necessary, accrued for tax
liabilities for periods open to examination. We have applied this methodology consistently with
prior periods.
We file income tax returns in multiple tax jurisdictions. In some of these jurisdictions, we file
returns for multiple legal entities. Generally, we are subject to scrutiny by tax auditors in
these jurisdictions for three to six years (open tax years). As of March 31, 2010, there were no
material changes regarding uncertain tax positions. No open statutes of limitations have been
extended materially in any of our significant locations.
We examine our deferred tax asset for realizability at least quarterly. The realizability of our
deferred tax asset is dependent upon multiple variables, including the amount of available loss
carry-back and forecasted net income. If we continue to operate in a loss position, under ASC 740,
we may be required to record a valuation reserve against a portion of our deferred tax asset.
Our IRS examination for the tax year 2006 was completed during 2009. The tax years 2007 and 2008
remain open to examination by the IRS. We periodically are under examination by various state and
local authorities.
For more information about our income taxes, read Note 20, Income taxes, in our 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Page 40
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
14. Segment reporting
We report business segment results for four segments: one for each of our three core businesses
Regional Banking, Wealth Advisory Services (WAS), and Corporate Client Services (CCS) and one
that combines the results of affiliate money managers Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn (CRM) and Roxbury
Capital Management (RCM).
Our business segment accounting policies are the same as those described in Note 2, Summary of
significant accounting policies, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our business segment
disclosures mirror the internal profitability reports we produce and review each quarter. We
report segment assets on an average-balance basis, because we believe average balances offer a more
relevant measure of business trends than period-end balances; we maintain and review all internal
segment data on an average-balance basis; and we base some expense allocations on an
average-balance basis. We have adjusted segment data for prior periods due to changes in reporting
methodology and/or organizational structure.
For more information about our business segments, read Item 2 in Part I of this report, as well as
Note 1, Nature of business, Note 4, Affiliates and acquisitions, and Note 23, Segment
reporting, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 41
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Regional |
|
|
Advisory |
|
|
Client |
|
|
Money |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Banking |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Managers |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/(loss) |
|
$ |
67.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(69.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss)/income after provision |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Advisory fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Advisory Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
Corporate Client Services |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
Affiliate Money Managers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advisory fees |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
Amortization of other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advisory fees after amortization of
other intangibles |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and noninterest income |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
(47.9 |
) |
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss)/profit before income taxes |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
Income tax (benefit)/expense and
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating (loss)/income |
|
$ |
(23.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(17.6 |
) |
Investment securities impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Income tax benefit for impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Reported net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
Investment in equity method investees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
159.9 |
|
|
$ |
159.9 |
|
Segment average assets |
|
$ |
8,847.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,503.1 |
|
|
$ |
535.9 |
|
|
$ |
158.4 |
|
|
$ |
11,044.4 |
|
Page 42
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Regional |
|
|
Advisory |
|
|
Client |
|
|
Money |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Banking |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Managers |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/(loss) |
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/(loss) after provision |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
49.0 |
|
Advisory fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Advisory Services |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
Corporate Client Services |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
Affiliate Money Managers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advisory fees |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
|
Amortization of other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advisory fees after amortization of
other intangibles |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
Other noninterest income |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and noninterest income |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
164.2 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
(42.9 |
) |
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(126.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
37.6 |
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) and
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income/(loss) |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
24.5 |
|
Investment securities impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Income tax benefit for impairment charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Reported net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
Investment in equity method investees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
160.2 |
|
|
$ |
160.2 |
|
Segment average assets |
|
$ |
9,926.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,540.8 |
|
|
$ |
493.5 |
|
|
$ |
158.7 |
|
|
$ |
12,119.6 |
|
15. Accounting pronouncements
The following recent accounting pronouncements may affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
SFAS No. 167 and ASU 2010-10. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to
FASB Interpretation No. 46(revised), which was incorporated into ASC 810, Consolidation. SFAS
No. 167 amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities (VIEs) under FIN
46(revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to, among other things, remove the
consolidation exception for qualifying special purpose entities; revise certain guidance for
determining whether an entity is a VIE; introduce a new consolidation approach that considers
qualitative factors for determining who should consolidate a VIE; and change when it is necessary
to reconsider both an
entitys status as a VIE and who should consolidate a VIE. SFAS No. 167 also introduces additional
disclosure and presentation requirements related to an entitys involvement in VIEs.
Page 43
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, which
indefinitely defers the effective date of SFAS No. 167 for an asset managers interests in entities
that have attributes of investment companies (e.g., mutual funds, hedge funds, private equity
funds, and venture capital funds), provided that the asset manager does not have an explicit or
implicit obligation to fund actual losses that potentially could be significant to the investment
company. The ASU also clarifies certain conditions under which fees paid to a decision maker or
service provider are considered variable interests in a variable interest entity. We identified
certain entities to which we provide asset management services that we may have been required to
consolidate under the provisions of SFAS No. 167. In accordance with the provisions of ASU
2010-10, we deferred adoption of SFAS No. 167 for those entities. We have not yet completed our
assessment of the effect, if any, that the lapsing of the deferral period will have on our
financial statements.
SFAS No. 167 and ASU 2010-10 were effective for us on January 1, 2010. Their adoption did not have
a material effect on our financial statements.
ASU 2009-13. In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements; a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, to establish the accounting for
certain revenue arrangements in which the vendor or service provider will perform multiple
revenue-generating activities (e.g., contracts that require an up-front fee along with fees that
recur over the life of the arrangement). Specifically, the ASU addresses how to separate
deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units of
accounting. ASU 2009-13 will be effective for revenue arrangements that are entered into or
materially altered after January 1, 2011. We do not expect its adoption to have a material effect
on our financial statements.
ASU 2010-06. In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about
Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic to
require new disclosures about transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 for fair value measurements,
and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, including separate presentation of information
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the Level 3 reconciliation.
Additionally, the ASU clarifies existing disclosure requirements regarding inputs and valuation
techniques as well as the appropriate level of disaggregation of assets and liabilities.
ASU 2010-06 was effective for us on January 1, 2010, except for the activity in Level 3 disclosure
requirements, which will be effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011. The adoption
of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material effect on our financial statements. We have added the fair
value disclosures that are required by this ASU to the financial statement footnotes.
Page 44
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
ASU 2010-11. In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Scope Exception Related to
Embedded Credit Derivatives, which clarifies the scope exceptions under existing guidance for
bifurcation of embedded credit derivatives. Specifically, ASU 2010-11 addresses when embedded
credit derivatives resulting from the transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination from one
financial instrument to another may or may not be considered for bifurcation and separate
accounting. ASU 2010-11 will be effective for us on July 1, 2010. We do not expect its adoption to
have a material effect on our financial statements.
16. Subsequent events
ASC 855, Subsequent Events, requires us to evaluate whether any changes in our financial
condition since March 31, 2010, warrant additional disclosure as a subsequent event. As of May 10,
2010, the filing date of this report, we determined that there were no recognized or unrecognized
subsequent events to report under ASC 855.
Page 45
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Wilmington Trust Corporation is (we are) a Delaware corporation and a financial holding company
under the Bank Holding Company Act. We deliver our services through three businesses:
Regional Banking. Our Regional Banking activities are concentrated in the mid-Atlantic region
of the United States. We define this area as the state of Delaware and the parts of Maryland,
New Jersey, and Pennsylvania that are within approximately 150 miles of our Wilmington
headquarters. We target commercial banking services to middle-market business owners throughout
this region. We define this market as businesses that are family-owned or closely held, with
annual sales of up to $250 million. We focus our consumer lending, residential mortgage
lending, and core deposit-gathering activities in the state of Delaware.
Corporate Client Services (CCS). The CCS business provides a variety of trustee, agency,
investment management, and administrative services for institutional clients. CCS has offices
in Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, South
Carolina, Vermont, Grand Cayman, the Channel Islands (Jersey), Amsterdam (The Netherlands),
Dublin (Ireland), London (England), Frankfurt (Germany), and Luxembourg. At the end of 2009,
CCS had clients in 89 countries.
Wealth Advisory Services (WAS). The WAS business helps individuals and families with
substantial wealth preserve and protect their wealth, minimize taxes, transfer wealth to future
generations, support charitable endeavors, and manage their business affairs. We do this
through a variety of asset management, family office, and fiduciary services. We target clients
who have liquid assets of $10 million or more. WAS has offices in California, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. At
the end of 2009, WAS had clients in all 50 states and 35 other countries.
More detail about each of our businesses is available in the summaries that follow and in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We provide our services through various legal entities and subsidiaries that we own wholly or in
part. Our primary wholly owned subsidiary, Wilmington Trust Company, was founded in 1903. For more
information about these entities and subsidiaries, the services they provide, and the regulations
to which they are subject, read Note 1, Nature of business, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Page 46
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
This report discusses:
|
|
Changes in our financial condition (balance sheet) since December 31, 2009. All balances
cited are period-end balances unless otherwise noted. In some cases, we present amounts as of
March 31, 2009, for historical reference. |
|
|
The results of our operations (income statement) for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared with the corresponding period in 2009. In some cases, we provide amounts for other
periods to provide historical context. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We reported a $29.2 million net loss for the 2010 first quarter. The main factors in this loss
were:
|
|
A $77.4 million provision for loan losses, due to past-due and nonperforming loans, as
well as continued uncertainty about the performance status of commercial loans. |
|
|
|
$18.0 million of other-than-temporary impairment charges taken primarily on our pooled
TruPS. These other than-temporary impairment losses were a direct result of
further credit deterioration among many of the underlying institutions in the pooled TruPS. |
After adjusting for the dividends and accretion on the shares of Wilmington Trust Series A
preferred stock issued in conjunction with our participation in the U.S. Department of the
Treasurys Capital Purchase Program (CPP), the net loss available to common shareholders was $33.8
million, or $0.44 per diluted common share.
We ended the quarter with $10.6 billion of total assets. Lower investment and loan balances drove
the $475 million decrease from year-end. Ending liabilities also were lower than at year-end,
mainly because total deposits and short-term borrowings decreased. Compared to the year-ago first
quarter, deposits rose $569 million, on average.
Our capital position remained strong at March 31, 2010, and benefited from a 21.7 million shares of
common stock issuance in the 2010 first quarter. This issuance netted proceeds of $274 million,
which qualified as both tangible common equity and regulatory Tier 1 capital. Tangible common
equity is a non-GAAP disclosure. For a discussion of tangible common
equity, read the capital ratios
discussion in this report.
Page 47
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Other significant factors included in our first quarter results, compared to the 2009 first
quarter, included:
|
|
Continued momentum in the CCS business, which recorded higher revenue from global corporate
trust services and retirement services. |
|
|
Improvement in the net interest margin over the 2009 first quarter, due to a change in our
funding mix. Higher core deposits, on average, in the 2010 first quarter reduced the need for
non-core funding, such as national brokered deposits and short-term borrowings. In addition,
the margin also benefited from the lag between asset and liability pricing. |
|
|
Lower net interest income (before the provision for loan losses), due to lower loan and
investment portfolio balances, higher nonperforming assets, and lower market interest rates. |
|
|
Lower WAS revenue, due mainly to our decision in the second quarter of 2009 to maximize
client return by waiving fees on money market mutual funds. |
We discuss each of these factors in greater detail in other sections of this report.
On April 21, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.01 per
common share. The dividend will be paid on May 17, 2010, to shareholders of record on May 3, 2010.
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
Our capital position improved during the 2010 first quarter. Ending stockholders equity benefited
from the 21.7 million share common stock issuance, completed on March 1, 2010. This issuance netted
proceeds of $274 million, which qualified as both tangible common equity and regulatory Tier 1
capital. All Wilmington Trust Corporation and Wilmington Trust Company regulatory capital ratios
improved from their year-end 2009 levels, and all continued to exceed the amounts required by the
Federal Reserve Board to be considered well capitalized, both including and excluding the equity
offering proceeds and the CPP funds we received in December 2008.
At March 31, 2010, our total assets were $10.62 billion, a $475.0 million, or 4%, decrease from
year-end 2009. This decrease reflected the decline in investment security and loan balances.
Ending investment securities balances decreased $95.5 million from year-end 2009, primarily due to
maturities and calls of government agency securities. Other-than-temporarily impaired (OTTI)
securities write-downs, primarily on pooled TruPS, also contributed to the decline.
Page 48
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Period-end loan balances decreased $251.6 million, or 3%, from year-end 2009 to $8.72 billion
as both commercial and consumer loan balances declined.
Total deposit balances at period-end decreased $567.6 million, or 7%, from year-end 2009. Most of
this decrease was in the noninterest bearing demand deposit and national brokered deposit
balances. In addition, liquidity from lower loan and investment balances allowed us to decrease
our short-term borrowings balances.
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Loan balances |
|
$ |
8,715.6 |
|
|
$ |
8,967.2 |
|
Loans as a percentage of total assets |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
Investment securities |
|
$ |
765.0 |
|
|
$ |
860.5 |
|
Investment securities as a percentage of total assets |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,622.1 |
|
|
$ |
11,097.1 |
|
Earning assets 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
9,658.0 |
|
|
$ |
10,035.0 |
|
Percentage in loans |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
Percentage in investment securities |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Percentage in other earning assets |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Earning assets as a percentage of total assets |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes loans, investment securities, FHLB and FRB stock,
interest-bearing deposits in other banks, and federal funds sold and
securities purchased under agreements to resell. Excludes the reserve for
loan losses. |
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
6,715.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,120.3 |
|
Core deposits as a percentage of total liabilities |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
National brokered CDs and short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
1,565.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,874.4 |
|
National brokered CDs and short-term borrowings
as a percentage of total liabilities |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
9,068.1 |
|
|
$ |
9,790.0 |
|
Wilmington Trust stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,554.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,306.7 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
10,622.1 |
|
|
$ |
11,097.1 |
|
Core deposits, on average, increased for the 2010 first quarter over the prior year first quarter.
The difference between average and period-end core deposits was due to movements of transactional
deposits by CCS clients.
Page 49
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Selected average balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Loan balances |
|
$ |
8,828.3 |
|
|
$ |
9,518.7 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
11,044.4 |
|
|
|
12,119.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposits |
|
|
7,239.4 |
|
|
|
5,907.2 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
8,494.4 |
|
|
|
7,925.0 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
9,623.5 |
|
|
|
10,789.7 |
|
For more information about loan and core deposit balances, read the Regional Banking discussion in
this report. For more information about our capital and stockholders equity, read the capital
resources discussion in this report.
Investment securities portfolio
We maintain an investment securities portfolio to generate cash flow, help manage interest rate
risk, and provide collateral for deposits and other liabilities. Our policy is to invest in
securities that have, at the time of purchase,
investment-grade ratings of A or better from Standard & Poors or Moodys Investors Service. We do
not hold investment securities for trading purposes. There are no client funds in this portfolio.
At March 31, 2010, the investment securities portfolio was $765.0 million, a decline of $95.5
million from year-end 2009. This decrease was caused primarily by:
|
|
Calls of government agency securities. |
|
|
Maturities of government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized
mortgage obligations. |
|
|
Write-downs of securities that were deemed to be OTTI under GAAP. |
In the 2010 first quarter, 23 of the 38 pooled TruPS in our investment securities portfolio were
determined to be OTTI, which resulted in an impairment loss write-down of $29.8 million. Of this
amount, $17.9 million was related to credit quality and was recorded as an other-than-temporary
impairment loss in the statement of income. The $17.9 million credit-related loss was caused by
continued deterioration in the credit quality of the institutions whose preferred stock underlie
the pooled TruPS that we own. The remaining $11.9 million noncredit-related portion of the
write-down reduced stockholders equity by $7.6 million on an after-tax basis, and was recorded in
other comprehensive income. In addition to the $17.9 million loss on pooled TruPS, we recorded a
$0.1 million loss on an available-for-sale equity security that was determined to be OTTI in the
2010 first quarter.
Page 50
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In total, OTTI securities losses in the 2010 first quarter were $18.0 million, which reduced
net income by approximately $11.6 million and earnings by approximately $0.15 per diluted common
share on an after-tax basis.
The investment securities portfolio composition shifted slightly during the 2010 first quarter. The
percentage of the portfolio invested in government agency securities decreased from 26% at year-end
to 19% at quarter-end due mainly to calls and maturities during the quarter. Offsetting this
decrease was an increase in the percentage invested in U.S. Treasury securities, which increased
slightly due to a lower total investment securities balance. All other investment securities
categories, on a percentage basis, remained similar to year-end.
Investment securities portfolio composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
portfolio |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
242.0 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
$ |
232.8 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Government agency securities 1 |
|
|
147.2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
225.1 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Mortgage-backed debt securities |
|
|
188.8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
203.4 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Trust-preferred securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled trust-preferred securities |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Single-issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trust-preferred securities |
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other preferred stock |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other marketable equity securities |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
$ |
765.0 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
860.5 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Amount invested in fixed rate instruments |
|
$ |
635.7 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
$ |
723.6 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes $0.5 million of non-U.S. government agency securities. |
Attrition in this portfolio and depressed TruPS valuations caused changes in the portfolios
average life and duration. The negative duration of the portfolio in total was caused by the lower
TruPS valuations and historically low market interest rates.
Average life and duration in the investment securities portfolio (in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Average life |
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
Duration |
|
|
(2.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.49 |
) |
Excluding TruPS, the investment securities portfolio duration at March 31, 2010 would have been
1.29 years.
Page 51
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For additional information about our investment securities, their valuations, and related
write-downs, read the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; Note 5, Fair value measurement of
assets and liabilities, and Note 10, Investment securities, in this report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
For the 2010 first quarter, we reported a net loss of $29.2 million. After adjusting for the
dividends and accretion on the shares of Wilmington Trust Series A preferred stock issued to the
U.S. Department of the Treasury in conjunction with our participation in the CPP, the net loss
available to common shareholders was $33.8 million, or $0.44 per diluted common share. This loss
was primarily the result of a $77.4 million provision for loan losses, combined with $18.0 million
of securities losses, primarily on pooled TruPS in our investment securities portfolio.
In comparison, net income for the 2009 first quarter was $21.8 million, and earnings were $0.25 per
diluted common share, after adjusting for the dividends and accretion on the shares of Wilmington
Trust Series A preferred stock. Net income for the 2009 first quarter included securities gains of
$12.1 million and OTTI securities charges of $4.5 million.
Lower net income was a function of sustained recessionary pressures and the market interest rate
environment. The main factors that caused the decrease in net income were:
|
|
An increase in the provision for loan losses. |
|
|
|
An increase in OTTI securities charges, primarily on pooled TruPS investment
securities. |
|
|
|
A decrease in net interest income due to declining loan balances, higher
non-performing asset balances, and the historically low interest rate environment. |
|
|
|
Mutual fund fee waivers, which reduced WAS revenue. |
The effects of the difficult financial environment were offset partially by some positive
quarter-over-quarter highlights.
|
|
New business increased CCS global corporate trust services revenue. |
|
|
|
CCS retirement services revenue rose, reflecting higher plan asset valuations and new
business. |
|
|
|
WAS trust and investment advisory fees increased due to higher client portfolio asset
valuations and new business. |
Page 52
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Compared to the year-ago first quarter, earnings per common share were affected by an increase
in the number of common shares outstanding. This resulted from the issuance of 21.7 million shares
on March 1, 2010. Because the shares outstanding used in the earnings per share calculation is an
average for the quarter, the full effect of this issuance will not be evident until the second
quarter of 2010. At March 31, 2010, there were 91.2 million shares outstanding. For more
information about this issuance, read the capital resources section of this report.
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Common shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
|
76,465 |
|
|
|
68,945 |
|
THE REGIONAL BANKING BUSINESS
Economic conditions in the mid-Atlantic region remained mixed. Despite some improving trends,
economic conditions in Delaware are improving more slowly than elsewhere in the mid-Atlantic
region, and remained uncertain. The severity and duration of the recession continued to affect loan
balances and our credit metrics during the 2010 first quarter.
Operating net income from the Regional Banking business was lower than for the year-ago first
quarter, due primarily to lower net interest income and the higher provision for loan losses.
Regional
Banking operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Segment operating net (loss)/income |
|
$ |
(23.3 |
) |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
Although this report discusses changes in loan and deposit balances on a period-end basis, we
consider average balances, rather than period-end balances, to be a better indicator of trends in
the Regional Banking business. This is because average balances represent client activity over the
longer term. This is especially true of core deposit balances, which can often be skewed by
movements of transactional deposits made by CCS clients. Information about changes in our average
balances appears in the quarterly and year-to-date analyses of net interest income, which appear
between the net interest margin and the noninterest income discussions in this report.
Page 53
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
LOANS
Weakness in the mid-Atlantic regional economy continued to reduce loan demand. Total loan balances
declined $251.6 million, or 3%, during the 2010 first quarter. Decreases in both the commercial and
consumer portfolios caused the mix of commercial and retail loans to remain relatively unchanged
from year-end. Approximately 79% of total loans outstanding at March 31, 2010, were floating rate
loans.
Total loans outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
% change |
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
6,542.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,685.7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Retail loans 1 |
|
|
2,173.6 |
|
|
|
2,281.5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans outstanding |
|
$ |
8,715.6 |
|
|
$ |
8,967.2 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes consumer loans, residential mortgage loans, and loans secured with investments. |
The mix of loans by geographic market remained unchanged from year-end, with the Delaware market
continuing to account for 54% of total loans outstanding at the end of the 2010 first quarter. The
composition of the loan portfolio by loan type also remained relatively unchanged.
Loan portfolio composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Commercial real estate- construction |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Indirect loans |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Credit card |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Other consumer |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Secured with investments |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail loans |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Loans secured with investments are associated mainly with WAS clients. We do not consider changes
in the balances of these loans to be indicative of trends in the Regional Banking business.
Page 54
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Commercial loans
Most of our commercial loans have floating rates, are secured by the borrowers assets, and are
supported by personal guarantees. At March 31, 2010:
|
|
Commercial loans made up approximately 75% of our total loan portfolio. |
|
|
Approximately 72% of commercial loans outstanding were for amounts of $10 million or less.
On a percentage basis, the mix of loans by size was relatively unchanged from prior periods. |
|
|
Approximately 91% of total commercial loans outstanding were floating rate loans. |
Decreases in the commercial, financial, and agricultural (CFA) loans and commercial construction
loans were offset partially by an increase in commercial mortgage loans during the quarter. The
geographic distribution of loans remained similar to year-end.
Commercial loan balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
% change |
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans |
|
$ |
2,539.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,627.0 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Commercial real estate construction loans |
|
|
1,872.9 |
|
|
|
1,956.4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
2,130.0 |
|
|
|
2,102.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
$ |
6,542.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,685.7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Commercial loans by geographic market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of total |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
commercial loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
commercial loans |
|
Delaware market loans |
|
$ |
3,539.9 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
$ |
3,601.9 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Pennsylvania market loans |
|
$ |
1,632.1 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
1,696.3 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Maryland market loans |
|
$ |
690.7 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
684.2 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
New Jersey market loans |
|
$ |
497.4 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
509.7 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Other market loans |
|
$ |
181.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
193.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans
Weak loan demand from continued recessionary conditions accounted for the decrease in CFA loan
balances from year-end 2009. CFA loan balances at the end of the 2010 first quarter were $87.9
million, or 3%, lower than at year-end 2009.
Page 55
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Commercial construction loans
Commercial construction loan balances decreased $83.5 million, or 4%, from year-end 2009, mainly
because several commercial construction projects were transferred to the commercial mortgage
category. Generally, upon completion of a commercial construction project, a loan is transferred to
the commercial mortgage category. Approximately $61.2 million of performing loans were transferred
to the commercial mortgage category during the 2010 first quarter. Pay downs, charge-offs, and weak
demand for commercial construction loans also contributed to the decrease. The quarter-end
commercial construction portfolio composition by project type as well as by geographic breakdown
remained similar to 2009 year-end.
Commercial construction loans by project type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Residential |
|
$ |
953.2 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
$ |
983.3 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
Land development |
|
|
425.1 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
434.9 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Retail and office |
|
|
288.8 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
344.0 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Owner-occupied |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Multi-family |
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,872.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,956.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial construction loans by geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Delaware |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
Maryland |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
New Jersey |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Commercial mortgage loans
Commercial mortgage loan balances
increased $27.7 million, or 1%, from year-end 2009, mainly due to
the transfer of approximately $61.2 million of commercial
construction projects to the commercial mortgage category during the 2010 first quarter. The composition of the commercial mortgage portfolio by project type
at the end of the quarter remained similar to the 2009 year-end composition. At March 31, 2010:
|
|
More than half of commercial mortgage loans were for owner-occupied properties. |
|
|
Approximately 18% of commercial mortgage loans were for community shopping centers. The
rest were for a variety of other types of commercial and industrial properties. |
Page 56
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Commercial mortgage loans by project type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Owner-occupied |
|
$ |
1,098.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,096.5 |
|
Retail |
|
|
376.7 |
|
|
|
368.8 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
128.1 |
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
Office |
|
|
185.8 |
|
|
|
156.8 |
|
Residential/land |
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
90.3 |
|
Hotel |
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
165.6 |
|
|
|
187.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage loans |
|
$ |
2,130.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,102.3 |
|
The geographic distribution of the commercial mortgage portfolio at quarter-end 2010 remained
consistent with year-end 2009.
Commercial mortgage loans by geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Delaware |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Pennsylvania |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Maryland |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
New Jersey |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Consumer loans
At March 31, 2010:
|
|
Consumer loan balances were 6% lower than at year-end 2009, with declines in all categories
of consumer loans. |
|
|
The largest decline was in the indirect lending category mainly in indirect automobile
loans in the portfolio. |
|
|
While consumer loan balances declined, the mix of consumer loans by geographic market was
unchanged from year-end 2009. Most of our consumer loans continued to be associated with
clients in Delaware, where we are the leading retail and commercial bank. |
Consumer loan portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
% change |
|
Indirect loans |
|
$ |
548.2 |
|
|
$ |
613.4 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
563.0 |
|
|
|
568.6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Credit card loans |
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Other consumer loans |
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
$ |
1,319.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,408.9 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Page 57
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Residential mortgage loans
We focus our residential mortgage lending activities in the state of Delaware, where we are among
the leading originators of residential mortgages. Most of the residential mortgages we originate
are traditional fixed rate conforming loans. We sell most of the fixed rate residential mortgages
we originate into the secondary market, instead of retaining them in our portfolio. We do not
engage in subprime residential mortgage lending.
Residential mortgage originations were considerably lower than in prior quarters. Despite a
continuing favorable interest rate environment, first quarter 2010 demand for refinancing was lower
than in 2009.
Residential mortgage originations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q4 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Dollar amount of originations |
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
|
$ |
60.1 |
|
|
$ |
102.3 |
|
Number of loans originated |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Percentage for home purchase |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Percentage for refinancing |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
Percentage of fixed rate originations |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
Residential mortgage balances were down marginally from year-end 2009. Reductions in loan balances
from payments of principal during the quarter were offset almost entirely by newly originated
mortgages, which we chose to retain in our loan portfolio.
Residential mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
% change |
|
Residential mortgage balances |
|
$ |
428.2 |
|
|
$ |
431.0 |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
DEPOSITS
We record two types of deposits:
|
|
Core deposits, which are deposits from our clients. Most of our core deposits come from
clients in Delaware, where we focus our consumer banking activities. Changes in core deposit
balances, on average, primarily reflect trends in the Regional Banking business. |
|
|
Non-core deposits, which include national brokered CDs and short-term borrowings. Non-core
deposits are not associated with client activity, and changes in their balances do not reflect
Regional Banking business trends. We use non-core deposits to augment core deposits to fund
earning asset growth. |
Page 58
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We discuss core deposits in this section. For more information about our use of national brokered
CDs, read the liquidity, funding, and interest rate risk management discussions in this report.
At March 31, 2010, core deposit balances were $404.6 million lower than at year-end 2009. Most of
this decrease was from a decrease in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, partially offset by an
increase in interest-bearing demand deposits.
The decline in noninterest-bearing demand deposits during the quarter reflected period-end balance
fluctuations that typically result from CCS client activity. It is not unusual for CCS client
deposit levels to fluctuate significantly. Because these CCS client deposits can skew period-end
balances, we generally consider average core deposit balances to be the better indicator of trends
in the Regional Banking business.
On average, noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances were higher than for the corresponding
year-ago period. For more detail on average core deposit balances,
see the quarterly analysis of
net interest income that appears between the net interest margin and the noninterest income
discussions in this report.
Regional Banking and WAS clients accounted for most of the growth in interest-bearing demand
deposits. This growth was spurred by client demand for the safety of insured funds amid economic
uncertainty and financial market volatility.
Core deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
% change |
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
676.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,470.6 |
|
|
|
(54 |
)% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
930.6 |
|
|
|
921.5 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
|
3,980.9 |
|
|
|
3,590.7 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
CDs < $100,000 |
|
|
1,003.8 |
|
|
|
1,000.6 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Local CDs ≥ $100,000 |
|
|
123.7 |
|
|
|
136.9 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
$ |
6,715.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,120.3 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent from Delaware clients |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Percent from Pennsylvania clients |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Percent from Maryland clients |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Percent from New Jersey clients |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Percent from clients in other markets |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Page 59
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Core deposit balances, on average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q4 |
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
1,307.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,219.5 |
|
Total core deposits |
|
$ |
7,239.4 |
|
|
$ |
6,741.2 |
|
We include balances of local CDs in amounts of $100,000 or more (local CDs) in core deposits
because these CDs reflect client deposits, not national, wholesale, or brokered deposits. Most
local CDs are from clients in the mid-Atlantic region, including commercial banking clients and
local municipalities, which frequently use these CDs to generate returns on their excess cash.
Balances of these CDs decreased during the 2010 first quarter, as customer demand declined.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income for the 2010 first quarter was lower than for the year-ago first quarter,
mainly because loan balances and investment securities balances, on average, declined. The effects
of these declines were mitigated partially by reductions in the cost of the funds used to support
earning assets. Other factors that affected net interest income in the first quarter included an
increase in nonperforming assets and a decrease in market interest rates since the 2009 first
quarter.
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
97.5 |
|
|
$ |
117.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
Percent generated by Regional Banking |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
Most of our net interest income comes from the Regional Banking business. The WAS and CCS
businesses also generate net interest income, because they have clients who use our banking
services. For more information about the allocation of net interest income among the three
businesses, read Note 14, Segment reporting, in this report.
Page 60
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET INTEREST MARGIN
Although the net interest margin declined from the 2009 fourth quarter, it improved 16 basis points
from the 2009 first quarter to 3.03%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q4 |
|
|
2009 Q3 |
|
|
2009 Q2 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Quarterly margin (not annualized) |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
Since the year-ago first quarter, our net interest margin has been affected by:
|
|
Our asset-sensitive interest rate risk position. When market interest rates change, our
floating rate assets reprice more quickly than our floating rate liabilities. The pricing on
most of our floating rate loans adjusts within 30 to 45 days of the rate change but it
typically takes 90 to 120 days for the corresponding pricing adjustments to occur on our
floating rate liabilities. Certain market interest rates, particularly LIBOR, continued to
decline throughout 2009 and, while floating rate loans generally adjusted within 30 to 45
days, our variable rate liability repricing lagged. During the 2010 first quarter, as compared
to the 2009 first quarter, we saw some of the lag effect on our overall liability pricing from
variable rate deposit repricing as well as higher rate CD maturities. Growth in core deposit
balances, on average, particularly noninterest-bearing deposits, lowered our funding costs by
reducing our need for national brokered CDs and other non-core sources of funds. Core
deposits, on average, increased $1.33 billion over the prior year first quarter, while average
national brokered certificates decreased $763 million and average short-term borrowings
decreased $1.61 billion. |
|
|
|
Higher nonperforming assets. |
|
|
|
Interest rate floors on most new and renewing loans, a practice we initiated in the first
quarter of 2009. |
More information about changes in our earning asset yields and cost of funds appears in this report
in the following analysis of net interest income, the analysis of changes in interest income and
expense due to volume and rate, and the interest rate risk discussion in the Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section.
Page 61
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
QUARTERLY ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
(dollar amounts in millions; rates on a tax-equivalent basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 first quarter |
|
|
2009 first quarter |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
balance |
|
|
expense |
|
|
rate |
|
|
balance |
|
|
expense |
|
|
rate |
|
Earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other
banks |
|
$ |
380.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
$ |
270.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
% |
Federal funds sold and securities
purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
|
383.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
302.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
230.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
Government agency securities |
|
|
192.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
398.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions 1 |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
8.91 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
8.82 |
|
Preferred stock 1 |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
8.98 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
9.61 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
234.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
589.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
Other securities 1 |
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
252.4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
827.2 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
1,328.3 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal
Reserve Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural loans |
|
|
2,567.4 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
2,853.4 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
|
Real estate construction loans |
|
|
1,912.9 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
1,950.7 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
2,124.3 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
1,911.6 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
6,604.6 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
6,715.7 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
426.8 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
573.8 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,365.4 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
1,686.4 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
Loans secured with investments |
|
|
431.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
542.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail loans |
|
|
2,223.7 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
2,803.0 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans 1,2 |
|
|
8,828.3 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
9,518.7 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets at historical cost |
|
$ |
10,065.8 |
|
|
$ |
97.9 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
$ |
11,169.5 |
|
|
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustment on investment
securities available for sale |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
10,053.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,115.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Tax-advantaged income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an income tax rate of 35% for all periods presented. |
|
2 |
|
Loan balances include nonaccruing loans. Interest income includes amortization of deferred loan fees.
Note: Average rates are calculated using average balances based on historical cost, and do not reflect market valuation adjustments. |
Page 62
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
QUARTERLY ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME (CONTINUED)
(dollar amounts in millions; rates on a tax-equivalent basis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 first quarter |
|
|
2009 first quarter |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
balance |
|
|
expense |
|
|
rate |
|
|
balance |
|
|
expense |
|
|
rate |
|
Funds supporting earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
925.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
$ |
895.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
% |
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
|
3,872.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
2,813.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
Certificates under $100,000 |
|
|
1,002.3 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
1,099.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
Local certificates $100,000 and over |
|
|
132.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
209.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
5,931.9 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
5,017.7 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
National brokered certificates |
|
|
1,255.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
2,017.8 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
7,186.9 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
7,035.5 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
313.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
1,938.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
U.S. Treasury demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit and other debt |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
341.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
1,948.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
443.2 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
469.0 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
7,971.5 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
9,453.4 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest funds |
|
|
2,094.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,716.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funds used to support earning
assets |
|
$ |
10,065.8 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
$ |
11,169.5 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/margin 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Tax-advantaged income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an income tax rate of 35% for all periods presented. |
|
2 |
|
To compute the net interest margin, we divide net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis by total earning assets, on average. |
|
|
|
Note: Average rates are calculated using average balances based on historical cost, and do not reflect market valuation adjustments. |
Page 63
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE DUE TO VOLUME AND RATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter 2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) due to changes in |
|
(in millions) |
|
Volume 2 |
|
|
Rate 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Government agency securities |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Obligations of state and political subdivisions 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Other securities 1 |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Commercial, financial, and agricultural loans |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Real estate construction loans |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Loans secured with investments |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail loans |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans net of unearned income |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
(14.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Certificates under $100,000 |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Local certificates $100,000 and over |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
National brokered certificates |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Line of credit and other debt |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
We calculate variances on a fully tax-equivalent basis, which includes the effects of
any disallowed interest expense deduction. |
|
2 |
|
We define changes attributable to volume as changes in average balances multiplied by
the prior years rate. |
|
3 |
|
We define changes attributable to rate as changes in rate multiplied by the average
balances in the applicable period of the prior year. A change
in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume) has been allocated to the change
in rate. |
Page 64
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income for the 2010 first quarter was lower than for the year-ago first quarter, mainly
because:
|
|
$18.0 million of other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities were recorded as
reductions in noninterest income. In comparison, we recorded $4.5 million of
other-than-temporary impairments on investment securities in the 2009 first quarter. |
|
|
WAS revenue was lower, mainly due to our decision to waive money market mutual fund fees. |
Partially offsetting the OTTI securities charge and the lower WAS revenue was an increase in CCS
revenue.
Noninterest income continues to grow as a percentage of combined net interest income and
noninterest income. CCS and WAS advisory fees continued to account for the majority of our
noninterest income.
Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Noninterest income 1 |
|
$ |
107.3 |
|
|
$ |
103.1 |
|
Net interest income (before provision for loan losses) |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
Noninterest income as a percentage of combined net
interest income (before provision for loan losses)
and noninterest income 1 |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
After amortization of affiliate intangibles, excluding securities gains/(losses) |
THE CORPORATE CLIENT SERVICES BUSINESS
We report three components of Corporate Client Services revenue:
|
|
Global corporate trust services revenue Fees for these services are based on the
complexity and duration of the services we provide, not on asset valuations. We perform most
of these services under multiyear contracts. In December 2009, we combined the formerly
separate capital markets and entity management revenue lines into a single category called
global corporate trust services. We adjusted prior period amounts presented in this report to
reflect this change. |
|
|
Retirement services revenue A portion of this revenue is based on the market valuations
of retirement plan assets and collective funds for which we are trustee. The remainder is
based on the level of service we provide. |
Page 65
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Investment and cash management services revenue This revenue is based on money market
fund balances and the market valuations of investment-grade fixed income instruments. |
For more information about the CCS business, read the CCS discussion in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
CCS in the first three months of 2010
Total CCS revenue increased 21% from the 2009 first quarter, mainly due to an increase in both
retirement services revenue and global corporate trust services revenue.
Corporate Client Services revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Global corporate trust services |
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
Retirement services |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Institutional investment/cash management services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate Client Services revenue |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
39.6 |
|
Global corporate trust services revenue was 19% higher than for last years first quarter, mainly
due to continued strong demand for successor loan agency services, default and bankruptcy
administration services, and high-yield corporate debt services. CCS is providing successor
trustee services, serving on the creditors committee, and/or providing other services for most of
the largest U.S. bankruptcies filed in recent years, including for Lehman Brothers, General Motors,
LyondellBasel Industries, General Growth Properties, Capmark Financial Group, Citidel Broadcasting
Corporation, and others.
Retirement services revenue was 34% higher than for last years first quarter, reflecting the
effect of improved market values of retirement services assets under management, combined with new
business. Much of the new business development was in collective investment fund services and
services that support defined contribution plans. Partially offsetting the increase in retirement
services revenue was a corresponding increase in retirement services subadvisor expense, which we
discuss in the noninterest expense section of this report. Retirement services subadvisor expense
was $9.9 million for the 2010 first quarter, compared to $6.7 million for the 2009 first quarter.
At March 31, 2010, CCS assets under management were $15.8 billion, compared to $9.8 billion at
March 31, 2009. For more information about this, read the assets under management and
administration discussion in this report.
Page 66
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CCS profitability increased in the 2010 first quarter, primarily because revenue was higher.
Corporate client services operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Segment operating net income |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
For more information about CCS operating net income, please read Note 14, Segment reporting, in
this report.
THE WEALTH ADVISORY SERVICES BUSINESS
We report three components of Wealth Advisory Services revenue:
|
|
Trust and investment advisory revenue This category consists of fees for asset
management, asset allocation, and trust management services. These fees are based on the
market valuations of the assets we manage, direct, or hold in custody for clients. These fees
are affected by movements in financial markets such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the
Standard & Poors 500 (S&P 500), NASDAQ, and others. Changes in trust and investment advisory
revenue may or may not correlate directly with financial market movements, depending on the
mix of assets in client accounts. |
|
|
Planning and other services revenue This category consists of fees from family office,
financial planning, estate settlement, tax, and other services. These fees are based on the
level and complexity of the services we provide, regardless of the value of any associated
assets. These fees can vary widely in amount, and portions may be nonrecurring. It is not
unusual for revenue from these services to fluctuate from one reporting period to another. |
When family office clients use our asset management services, the associated fees are based on
market valuations and recorded as trust and investment advisory revenue.
|
|
Mutual fund revenue Most of our mutual fund fees are tied to money market mutual funds
and cash balances. Consequently, equity market movements typically have little, if any,
effect on this category of revenue. |
For more information about the WAS business, read the WAS discussion in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Page 67
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
WAS in the first three months of 2010
In the 2010 first quarter, an increase in trust and investment advisory services revenue was offset
by decreases in both mutual fund and planning and other services revenue.
Wealth Advisory Services revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Trust and investment advisory revenue |
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
Mutual fund revenue |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Planning and other services revenue |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wealth Advisory Services revenue |
|
$ |
44.1 |
|
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
Revenue from trust and investment advisory services benefited from increases in the market values
of WAS client assets under direction and administration, combined with new business development.
Trust and investment advisory revenue was 11% higher than for the 2009 first quarter.
Mutual fund revenue declined significantly from the 2009 first quarter. This decrease was
attributable to mutual fund fee waivers. In order to maximize returns for our clients, management
began waiving fees on money market mutual funds in the 2009 second quarter, as low market interest
rates caused yields to reach historic lows. These waivers reduced WAS mutual fund revenue by $4.4
million in the 2010 first quarter. Decreases in mutual fund balances also contributed to the
decline in mutual fund revenue.
Planning and other services revenue was lower than for the year-ago first quarter, mainly due to
lower revenue from business management firm Grant Tani Barash & Altman (GTBA). Revenue from GTBA
declined because we sold 80% of the ownership interests in GTBA to its principals on February 16,
2010. As part of this transaction, future profit distributions to us were limited by the agreement.
In 2009, revenue from GTBA was approximately $3.4 million per quarter. The ownership reduction does
not affect the client bases of either company, or our family office capabilities. We continue to
offer family office services to high-net-worth clients throughout the United States from our
offices on the East Coast and in Los Angeles. In addition, we expect to continue to work with GTBA
to leverage our collective expertise on strategic, tactical, and industry issues, and to provide
services to specific client segments, including entertainers and athletes. For more information
about GTBA, please read Note 1, Accounting and reporting policies, in this report.
Page 68
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
WAS profitability decreased in the 2010 first quarter, primarily because WAS revenue declined, and
because the portion of the provision for loan losses attributed to WAS increased.
Wealth advisory services operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Segment operating net (loss)/income |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
For more information about WAS operating net income, please read Note 14, Segment reporting, in
this report.
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
We report two types of client assets:
|
|
Assets under management (AUM). These are assets for which we make investment decisions on
behalf of clients. Most of our AUM are associated with WAS clients. |
|
|
Assets under administration (AUA). These are assets we hold in custody, or for which we
serve as fiduciary, on behalf of clients. Most of our AUA are associated with CCS retirement
services clients. |
Because we provide a variety of services in addition to asset management and custody, and because
most of the assets we manage or administer are held in trusts, changes in amounts of AUM or AUA do
not necessarily indicate that we have gained or lost business. Consequently, we believe that
changes in revenue, rather than changes in AUM or AUA, are the better indicators of trends in the
WAS and CCS businesses. For more information about this, read the AUM and AUA discussion in our
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Client assets at Wilmington Trust 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
WAS assets under management |
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
CCS assets under management |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wilmington Trust assets under management |
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
$ |
34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAS assets under administration |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
CCS assets under administration |
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wilmington Trust assets under administration |
|
$ |
106.9 |
|
|
$ |
106.5 |
|
|
$ |
88.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined AUM and AUA at Wilmington Trust |
|
$ |
149.2 |
|
|
$ |
148.6 |
|
|
$ |
122.2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Excludes Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn and Roxbury Capital Management. Includes estimates of
asset values that are not readily available, such as those held in limited partnerships. |
Page 69
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
In general, WAS AUM increased as a result of improved market valuations. This increase was
offset by a $0.5 million reduction in WAS assets during the 2010 first quarter for assets that
were previously reflected within the WAS AUM that are now reflected within the CCS business. |
|
|
The increase in CCS AUM at the end of the 2010 first quarter over prior periods was caused
primarily by new business as well as improved market value of the assets managed by CCS. In
addition, $0.5 million of assets that were previously reflected within WAS assets are now
reflected within the CCS business. Routine fluctuations in CCS client accounts can also cause
increases and decreases in AUM. Monetary assets we manage or administer for CCS clients can
fluctuate by hundreds of millions of dollars from one reporting period to the next, depending
on the cash management needs of these clients. |
The investment mix remained similar to the mix at year-end 2009, but reflects a shift from the
prior year first quarter. The increase in the percentage of client assets invested in equities from
prior year first quarter reflects an increase in the market valuation of equity securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment mix of Wilmington Trust AUM 1 |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
Equities |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Fixed income |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Other assets |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Excludes Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn and Roxbury Capital Management. |
AFFILIATE MONEY MANAGERS
We have ownership positions in two money management firms:
|
|
Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn (CRM), a value-style manager based in New York. |
|
|
Roxbury Capital Management (RCM), a growth-style manager
based in Minneapolis. |
Affiliate money manager revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Total revenue from affiliate money managers (net of expenses) |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
The revenue we record from CRM and RCM is net of their expenses and based on our ownership position
in each. We do not consolidate CRM or RCM in our financial statements because the principals of
these firms retain management controls, including veto powers, over a variety of matters. CRM and
RCM are not part of our WAS business, and their managers and staff are not Wilmington Trust
employees. For more information about CRM and RCM, read the rest of this affiliate money managers
discussion in this report, Note 14, Segment reporting, in this report, and Note 4, Affiliates
and acquisitions, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 70
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn
Revenue from CRM for the 2010 first quarter was higher than for the 2009 first quarter because:
|
|
New business increased AUM and the corresponding fees. |
|
|
Market improvements during 2009 and the 2010 first quarter increased client asset
valuations and the corresponding fees. |
Revenue from CRM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Revenue (net of expenses) |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
Changes in ownership position and CRM AUM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in billions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
CRM assets under management |
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
Wilmington Trusts ownership position |
|
|
79.75 |
% |
|
|
79.75 |
% |
|
|
80.99 |
% |
Roxbury Capital Management
RCM revenue for the 2010 first quarter was higher than for the year-ago first quarter because:
|
|
RCM continued its efforts to reduce expenses and improve profitability. |
|
|
Market improvements during 2009 and the 2010 first quarter increased client asset
valuations and the corresponding fees. |
Revenue from RCM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Revenue (net of expenses) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
Changes in ownership position and RCM AUM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in billions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
RCM assets under management |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
Wilmington Trusts ownership position: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership of preferred profits |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Ownership of common interests |
|
|
41.23 |
% |
|
|
41.23 |
% |
|
|
41.23 |
% |
Ownership of Class B interests |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Page 71
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Noninterest expense for the 2010 first quarter was $131.5 million, an increase of 4.0% from the
2009 first quarter.
Staffing-related costs continued to account for the majority of our total noninterest expense.
Total staffing-related expense was $1.7 million, or 2%, higher than for the year-ago first quarter.
We had 2,821 full-time-equivalent staff members at March 31, 2010. This was 124 fewer than at
March 31, 2009. Much of this decline was associated with our reduced ownership position in GTBA.
Prior to this change, GTBAs revenue and expenses were consolidated in Wilmington Trusts financial
statements, and GTBA staff members were counted as Wilmington Trust staff members. Because we
reduced our ownership position in GTBA on February 16, 2010, midway through the 2010 first quarter,
the associated decline in expenses will not be reflected fully until the 2010 second quarter.
GTBAs operations accounted for approximately $3.0 million of noninterest expense per quarter in
2009. For more information about GTBA, please read Note 1, Accounting and reporting policies, in
this report. Additionally, some of the decline in staffing is due to the closure of our
collateralized debt obligation and conduit services business at the end of the 2009 first quarter.
Staffing-related expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Total staffing-related expenses |
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
$ |
70.7 |
|
Staffing-related expense as a percentage of total noninterest expense |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
The increase in total staffing related expense was attributable to an uncharacteristically low
incentive and bonus expense in the 2009 first quarter. 2009 first quarter expense was lower because
incentives and bonuses reflected downward adjustments that were made to align amounts accrued in
2008 with payments actually made in 2009.
Other factors that contributed to the increase in noninterest expense during the quarter were:
|
|
Higher retirement services subadvisor expense, which was a direct result of new business in
the CCS retirement services business line. We discuss the increase in CCS retirement services
revenue in the CCS business discussion. |
|
|
An increase in insurance expense resulting from higher Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) premiums. Our FDIC insurance expense was $5.5 million for the 2010 first
quarter, compared to $3.3 million for the same period in 2009. Higher FDIC insurance expense
in the 2010 first quarter reflected growth in average core deposits between the two periods,
as well as an industry-wide premium increase and a revision to
the methodology that the FDIC uses to calculate premiums, that were implemented in the 2009
second quarter. The FDIC has proposed changes to the calculation of the assessment base that
could increase premiums in future periods. |
|
|
A $2.8 million charge recorded in the 2009 first quarter that stemmed from an error during
a systems conversion. |
Page 72
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate for the 2010 first quarter was 35.96%, compared with 33.94% for the 2009
first quarter. For more information about our income taxes, read Note 13, Income taxes, in this
report.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
We manage capital to meet or exceed appropriate standards of financial safety and soundness, comply
with existing and impending regulatory requirements, and provide for future growth. We review our
capital position and make adjustments as needed to ensure we can achieve these objectives. Our
wholly owned bank subsidiaries are the main users of our capital, and they are subject to
regulatory capital requirements. The CCS and WAS businesses are not as capital-intensive. Neither
CCS nor WAS is subject to regulatory capital requirements, although some of our trust agreements
specify certain capital requirements.
During the 2010 first quarter, we completed an underwritten public offering of 21,706,250 shares of
common stock. The offering was priced at $13.25 per share and raised $274.0 million, net of $13.7
million of underwriting discounts and commissions. The proceeds qualify as both tangible common
equity and regulatory Tier 1 capital and will be used for general corporate purposes.
Our capital at March 31, 2010, included $330.0 million of Wilmington Trust Series A preferred stock
and warrants, which we sold to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the CPP in December 2008.
We will pay a 5% dividend on this preferred stock annually until 2013, and 9% annually thereafter.
The Series A preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital, has no maturity date, and ranks senior to
our common stock for dividend payments and other matters. Full details of our participation in the
CPP and its terms are in a prospectus supplement and amended shelf registration statement dated
January 12, 2009, which are available on www.wilmingtontrust.com in the Investor Relations section,
under SEC filings.
Page 73
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For accounting purposes, we allocated the $330.0 million we received under the CPP to the preferred
stock and stock warrants, based on their relative estimated fair values. In order to record the
value of the stock warrants, we recorded a corresponding discount on the preferred stock, which we
will accrete over a five-year period that began on December 12, 2008. Along with the dividends on
the preferred stock, we deduct the accretion of the discount from net income to arrive at net
income available to common shareholders. For the 2010 first quarter, the accretion of the discount
was $0.4 million. For more information about this, read Note 4, Earnings per share, in this
report.
Capital strength
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
Common stockholders equity (period end) |
|
$ |
1,230.3 |
|
|
$ |
983.4 |
|
Common stockholders equity (on average) |
|
$ |
1,097.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,009.0 |
|
Loss on average common stockholders equity (annualized) |
|
|
(10.79 |
)% |
|
|
(0.44 |
)% |
Loss on average assets (annualized) |
|
|
(1.07 |
)% |
|
|
(0.04 |
)% |
The increased loss from prior periods in the return on common stockholders equity and the return
on average assets reflected the continued economic pressures we experienced during the 2010 first
quarter. These pressures resulted in an increase in the provision for loan losses and investment
securities impairment charges, both of which reduced net income and, therefore, our ability to
generate capital through retained earnings.
On April 21, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.01 per
common share. This dividend will be paid on May 17, 2010, to shareholders of record on May 3, 2010.
Capital ratios
At March 31, 2010, all of Wilmington Trust Corporations and Wilmington Trust Companys regulatory
capital ratios were higher than at year-end and were higher than historic levels. All of our
capital ratios continued to exceed the amounts required by the Federal Reserve Board to be
considered well capitalized, both including and excluding the proceeds from our first quarter 2010
equity offering and the CPP funds we received in December 2008. The Federal Reserve Boards
guidelines are intended to reflect the varying degrees of risk associated with different on- and
off-balance-sheet items. For more information about these guidelines, read the capital resources
discussion and Note 16, Capital, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Regulatory capital ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
|
Minimum to be |
|
|
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
|
3/31/09 |
|
|
well capitalized |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
|
17.58 |
% |
|
|
14.31 |
% |
|
|
14.15 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
|
12.90 |
% |
|
|
9.86 |
% |
|
|
9.40 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage capital |
|
|
12.25 |
% |
|
|
10.10 |
% |
|
|
9.02 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Page 74
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Amounts of regulatory capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
be well |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
WL capital |
|
|
capitalized |
|
|
WL capital |
|
|
capitalized |
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
$ |
1,807.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,028.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,568.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,095.9 |
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
$ |
616.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,080.1 |
|
|
$ |
657.6 |
|
Tier 1 leverage capital |
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
$ |
541.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,080.1 |
|
|
$ |
534.5 |
|
Two of the tools we use to measure the adequacy of our capital are the tangible common
equity-to-assets (TCE) ratio and the Tier 1 common equity ratio. Both of these ratios improved from
year-end 2009 because of the common stock offering in the first quarter.
Tangible common equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
1,554.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,307.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
323.7 |
|
|
|
323.3 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
359.6 |
|
|
|
363.2 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity |
|
$ |
836.5 |
|
|
$ |
580.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,622.1 |
|
|
$ |
11,097.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
359.6 |
|
|
|
363.2 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets |
|
$ |
10,228.3 |
|
|
$ |
10,693.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE ratio |
|
|
8.18 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
Tier 1 common equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
Tier 1 capital |
|
$ |
1,326.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,080.1 |
|
Less preferred stock |
|
|
323.7 |
|
|
|
323.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
1,002.3 |
|
|
$ |
756.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
10,281.7 |
|
|
$ |
10,959.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE ratio |
|
|
9.75 |
% |
|
|
6.91 |
% |
Page 75
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The TCE ratio and the Tier 1 common equity ratio are non-GAAP disclosures. We believe they are
useful tools because they reflect the level of capital we have available to withstand unexpected
market conditions. In addition, they are measures that credit rating agencies and industry
analysts use to evaluate our financial condition and capital strength.
The tables above reconcile tangible common equity, Tier 1 common equity, and tangible assets as of
March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, to the most directly comparable financial measures
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Because the TCE ratio and the Tier 1 common equity ratio are non-GAAP disclosures, some limitations
are inherent in their use. They may not offer relevant comparisons to other companies. In
addition, other companies might calculate these ratios differently. Consequently, the TCE ratio
and the Tier 1 common equity ratio should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for
stockholders equity, total assets, or any other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. We
calculate our TCE ratio by using a numerator of stockholders equity (excluding preferred stock and
the noncontrolling interest) minus the sum of goodwill and other intangibles. The denominator we
use is total assets minus the sum of goodwill and other intangibles. We calculate our Tier 1 common
equity ratio using a numerator of Tier 1 capital minus preferred stock. The denominator we use is
total risk-weighted assets.
Share repurchase program
Our current share repurchase plan, which was authorized by our Board of Directors in April 2002,
permits us to buy back up to 8 million shares of Wilmington Trust common stock. Our share
repurchase activity reflects how we choose to deploy capital, and our decisions are not driven
solely by share price.
We did not repurchase any of our shares under this program during the 2010 first quarter. We have
agreed not to repurchase our stock without prior written approval from our regulators. In addition,
until December 12, 2011, or until the U.S. Treasury no longer holds any of the Series A preferred
stock we issued under the CPP, whichever is earlier, we are not permitted to repurchase any of our
common stock, subject to certain exceptions, without prior approval of our regulators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current repurchase plan activity |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
Number of shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price per share repurchased |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total cost of shares repurchased |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total shares purchased under current plan |
|
|
3,043,796 |
|
|
|
3,043,796 |
|
|
|
3,043,796 |
|
Shares available for repurchase |
|
|
4,956,204 |
|
|
|
4,956,204 |
|
|
|
4,956,204 |
|
Page 76
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Amounts in the table above do not match the amounts reported under Part II, Item 2, in this report,
because those amounts include shares we receive when recipients of stock-based compensation tender
their shares to exercise their options or to cover payroll taxes on restricted stock vesting. We
consider those types of share acquisitions to be outside the parameters of our authorized share
repurchase plan, because those shares are not trading on the open market when we acquire them.
LIQUIDITY AND FUNDING
As a bank holding company, we need funding and liquidity to support operating and investing
activities, comply with regulatory requirements, and minimize the risk of having insufficient funds
to conduct business. We believe our liquidity position is strong because:
|
|
Our capital ratios demonstrate that we are well capitalized. |
|
|
We have access to diverse sources of funding, which mitigates our liquidity risk and gives
us the ability to adjust the mix and amount of funding as we deem appropriate. |
|
|
Our liquidity management practices give us the flexibility to react to changes that might
affect our liquidity adversely. |
To manage the risk of having insufficient liquidity, we:
|
|
Monitor our existing and projected liquidity requirements continually. |
|
|
Follow policies in the Liquidity/Funding Plan approved by our Board of Directors. |
|
|
Calculate a wholesale funding coverage ratio monthly using three-, six-, and 12-month time
horizons. |
|
|
Identify our exposure to volatile liabilities and calculate liquid asset coverage ratios. |
In addition, we maintain a contingency funding plan (CFP). The CFP articulates various internal and
external scenarios that could create or exacerbate liquidity risk, outlines potential outcomes in
each scenario, and specifies strategies to employ in response. We use the guidelines in the CFP to
stress-test our liquidity position in a normal operating scenario, a moderately disruptive
scenario, a severely disruptive scenario, and a crisis scenario. Response
strategies in the CFP identify alternative funding sources and our borrowing capabilities for each.
The plan allows for adjusting the borrowing capacities, depending on the stress scenario and the
funding source.
Page 77
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Factors or conditions that could affect our liquidity position or cost of funding adversely include
changes in:
|
|
The types of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. |
|
|
Our investment, loan, and deposit balances. |
|
|
Our financial performance. |
|
|
Economic conditions that limit the range of capital-raising options available to us and/or
our ability to sell certain types of investment securities. |
|
|
Credit ratings downgrades. |
For more information on our liquidity and funds management practices, and liquidity risk scenarios,
read the discussion of liquidity and funding in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity in the first three months of 2010
Sources of liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Core deposit balances |
|
$ |
6,715.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,120.3 |
|
National brokered CDs |
|
|
1,107.6 |
|
|
|
1,270.6 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
457.5 |
|
|
|
603.8 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
443.5 |
|
|
|
442.9 |
|
Wilmington Trust stockholders equity |
|
|
1,554.0 |
|
|
|
1,306.7 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
765.0 |
|
|
|
860.5 |
|
Unused borrowing capacity secured with collateral from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB) 1 |
|
|
596.1 |
|
|
|
635.9 |
|
Unused borrowing capacity secured with collateral from the Federal Reserve |
|
|
2,543.9 |
|
|
|
2,469.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,183.3 |
|
|
$ |
14,710.6 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Wilmington Trust Company and Wilmington Trust FSB are FHLB members. The FHLB adjusts
our borrowing capacity quarterly, but we do not receive the adjustment calculations until
after the filing dates of our quarterly and annual reports. The amounts shown are based on
financial information as of December 31, 2009, and September 30, 2009, respectively. We
expect our actual unused FHLB borrowing capacity at March 31, 2010, to be less than the amount
shown, because our asset levels at March 31, 2010, were lower than at December 31, 2009. |
For more information about our long-term debt, read Note 11, Borrowings, in this report.
Page 78
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Funding
Our funding strategy is to use a blend of core and non-core funding:
|
|
Core deposits, which are deposits made by clients. |
|
|
National brokered CDs, which we gather through various broker networks, and which typically
consist of aggregated deposits from individuals, mutual funds, or financial institutions. |
The mix between national brokered CDs and short-term borrowings can change over time and depends on
our maturity and pricing needs.
Our use of non-core funding:
|
|
Supports our Regional Banking business model. We gather core deposits primarily in
Delaware, where our consumer banking activities are focused, but we make commercial loans
throughout the mid-Atlantic region, a much larger geographic area. |
|
|
Helps us manage interest rate risk, since we can match the repricing characteristics of our
floating rate loans more easily with non-core funding than with core deposits. |
Our funding mix shifted slightly during the 2010 first quarter. An increase in funding from our
common stock issuance, combined with decreases in our investment and loan portfolio balances,
reduced the need for non-core funding during the quarter. End-of-quarter core
deposits were lower than at year-end 2009, mainly due to a decrease in noninterest-bearing demand
deposits associated primarily with transactional deposits by CCS clients.
At March 31, 2010, all of the underlying deposits in our national brokered CDs were from individual
depositors.
Selected asset and liability balance changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
$ change |
|
|
% change |
|
Total investment balances |
|
$ |
765.0 |
|
|
$ |
860.5 |
|
|
$ |
(95.5 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan balances |
|
$ |
8,715.6 |
|
|
$ |
8,967.2 |
|
|
$ |
(251.6 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit balances |
|
$ |
6,715.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,120.3 |
|
|
$ |
(404.6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National brokered CDs |
|
$ |
1,107.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,270.6 |
|
|
$ |
(163.0 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
457.5 |
|
|
|
603.8 |
|
|
|
(146.3 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-core funding |
|
$ |
1,565.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,874.4 |
|
|
$ |
(309.3 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Page 79
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
On average, the percentage of funding from core deposits increased during the 2010 first quarter,
while the percentage from non-core funding decreased. This shift was caused by the increase in
average noninterest-bearing demand deposits, mainly from CCS client activity.
Funding for the three months ended March 31 (on average)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Percentage from core deposits |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
Percentage from non-core funding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage from national brokered CDs |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Percentage from short-term borrowings |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total percentage from non-core funding |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Loan-to-deposit ratio |
|
|
104 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
For more information about our funding strategy, read the funding and liquidity risk discussion in
our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For more information about how we manage interest rate risk,
read the Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk section of this report.
Credit ratings
Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors downgraded the credit ratings of Wilmington Trust Corporation
and Wilmington Trust Company during the 2010 first quarter. We do not expect these downgrades to
have any significant effect on our operations, financial condition, or business prospects.
Wilmington Trust Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys Investors |
|
|
|
|
Fitch Ratings |
|
Service |
|
Standard & Poors |
|
|
(As of 1/29/10) |
|
(As of 4/24/09) |
|
(As of 2/1/10) |
Outlook
|
|
Negative
|
|
Negative
|
|
Negative |
Issuer rating (long-term/short-term)
|
|
BBB+/F2
|
|
Baa3 / *
|
|
BB+/ B |
Subordinated debt
|
|
BBB
|
|
Ba1
|
|
BB- |
|
|
|
* |
|
No rating in this category |
Wilmington Trust Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys Investors |
|
|
|
|
Fitch Ratings |
|
Service |
|
Standard & Poors |
|
|
(As of 1/29/10) |
|
(As of 4/24/09) |
|
(As of 2/1/10) |
Outlook
|
|
Negative
|
|
Negative
|
|
Negative |
Bank financial strength
|
|
C
|
|
C-
|
|
* |
Issuer rating (long-term/short-term)
|
|
BBB+/F2
|
|
Baa2
|
|
BBB-/A-3 |
Bank deposits (long-term/short-term)
|
|
A-/F1
|
|
Baa2/P-2
|
|
BBB-/A-3 |
|
|
|
* |
|
No rating in this category |
Page 80
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CREDIT RISK AND ASSET QUALITY
At March 31, 2010:
|
|
Loans accounted for 82% of our assets. |
|
|
Investment securities accounted for 7% of our assets. For more information about the
quality of these assets, read the investment portfolio discussion and Note 10, Investment
securities, in this report. |
|
|
Most of our asset risk remained tied to credit (lending) risk. |
CREDIT RISK
Lending money is inherently risky. When we make a loan, we make subjective judgments about the
borrowers ability to meet the loans terms and conditions. No matter how financially sound a
client or lending decision may seem, the borrowers ability to repay can be affected adversely by
economic changes and other external factors. In addition, we make objective and subjective
valuation assessments on assets we finance. In most cases, these assets secure loans we make.
Over time, changes in market conditions can affect these valuations, either positively or
negatively.
How we mitigate credit risk
To mitigate credit risk, we:
|
|
Employ rigorous loan underwriting standards and apply them consistently. |
|
|
Prefer to grow loan balances ourselves, using our own underwriting standards, instead of
purchasing loans or acquiring other banks. |
|
|
Make the majority of our loans within Regional Bankings mid-Atlantic geographic footprint,
in markets we know well. |
|
|
Focus on building long-term relationships with clients, instead of merely increasing
transaction volumes. |
|
|
Typically obtain collateral and personal guarantees from commercial borrowers. |
|
|
Monitor the loan portfolio to identify potential problems. |
|
|
Regularly review all past-due loans, loans not being repaid according to contractual terms,
and loans we doubt will be paid on a timely basis. |
|
|
Perform an internal risk-rating analysis that classifies all loans outstanding into one of
four primary categories of risk, with gradations in each category. We apply these
classifications consistently and we analyze migrations within the classifications quarterly.
This system has helped us develop adequate loan loss reserves for many years. The four risk
categories are: |
|
|
|
Pass: Loans with no current or potential problems. |
|
|
|
Watchlist: Accruing loans that are potentially problematic. |
|
|
|
Substandard: Accruing or nonaccruing loans with identified weaknesses and some
probability of loss. |
|
|
|
Doubtful/loss: Nonaccruing loans with a high probability of loss, or which we have
charged off. |
Page 81
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In addition, we divide credit risk-related responsibilities among different groups of staff
members, including lending, loan recovery, credit policy and administration, appraisal, and credit
review staff members. These groups have different reporting relationships:
|
|
The lending group is part of our Regional Banking business, and its reporting relationships
follow the Regional Banking organizational structure. |
|
|
The credit policy and administration group reports directly to our chairman and chief
executive officer. Loan recovery and appraisal staff members are part of this group. |
|
|
The credit review group functions independently and reports directly to the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors. |
Appraisal staff members determine whether revaluations should be performed by staff members or
third-party appraisers, unless the property secures a loan which has been determined to be impaired
under ASC 310, Receivables, which requires that revaluations be performed by third-party
appraisers. Our appraisal staff members review all appraisals performed by third-party
professionals.
The credit review group provides a variety of analyses designed to help us understand the condition
of the loan portfolio. This group performs:
|
|
Analyses of the portfolio by type of loan, geographic exposure, and individual lender. |
|
|
Annual reviews of a minimum percentage of the portfolio. |
|
|
Assessments of the accuracy of internal risk ratings within specific portfolio segments. |
|
|
Assessments of the adequacy of monitoring and administration for specific portfolio
segments. |
|
|
Reviews of our largest credit exposures. |
We believe our approach gives us a system of checks and balances that enhances our ability to
evaluate credit risk.
How we identify potential problem loans
To identify potential problem loans, we:
|
|
Review payment performance on an ongoing basis. |
|
|
Analyze account overdrafts. |
|
|
Monitor compliance with established loan covenants or collateral formulas. |
|
|
Perform targeted reviews and analyses of loans by type, size, and borrower. |
Page 82
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For consumer and residential mortgage loans, we identify problems primarily by reviewing payment
performance. We do not assign risk ratings to loans in these portfolios.
For commercial loans and loans secured with investments, the process is more complex, and it
involves a high degree of management review and judgment.
Every commercial loan (and loan secured with investments) receives an initial risk rating that is
assigned by the client relationship manager. It is the client relationship managers
responsibility to identify deterioration in the quality of a loan, as soon as such conditions are
known or suspected, by changing the loans assigned risk rating. The independent credit review
group examines and confirms these risk ratings to ensure that they reflect the risk profile of the
portfolio accurately.
For each significant potential problem loan in the commercial and secured with investments
portfolios, the client relationship manager prepares a written summary that contains information
about the borrowers financial performance, payment history, and collateral position, as well as an
action plan for managing the credit. These summaries are reviewed and discussed by lending staff
members in each of our Regional Banking markets at quarterly loan quality meetings. Depending on a
credits risk profile, Regional Banking managers may ask loan recovery staff members to consult on,
or assume responsibility, for managing the credit.
When we downgrade a loan to a substandard rating, we require loan recovery staff members, at a
minimum, to consult on the loan. When a substandard loans risk profile deteriorates, or when the
risk rating is lower than
substandard, we transfer the client relationship from the lending unit to our loan recovery unit.
Exceptions to this policy must be approved by the manager of the division in which the loan resides
and by the loan recovery group.
We conduct quarterly credit strategies meetings to review significant relationships with ratings
that are substandard or lower, or other credits that demonstrate rapid and/or severe deterioration
and a high probability of income and/or principal loss. Among the issues we analyze and review at
these meetings are collection strategies, plans to improve performance, and levels of available
collateral support. Members of senior management attend these meetings.
Page 83
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
How we manage problem loans
When a loan becomes 30 or more days past due, we consider it a sign of a possible problem, and we
increase our monitoring of that loan in an effort to prevent more severe delinquency. When a loan
becomes 90 or more days past due, or if it has been identified as a potential problem loan, we may
take one or more of the following steps:
|
|
Confirm the loans assigned risk rating. |
|
|
Review our collateral position and valuations. |
|
|
Allocate an appropriate incremental amount to the reserve for loan losses. |
|
|
Transfer all or part of the loan relationship to nonaccruing status. |
|
|
Renegotiate all or part of the loans terms. |
|
|
Foreclose on real property or accept a deed to real property in lieu of foreclosure, and
record the propertys value as other real estate owned (OREO). |
|
|
Charge off all or part of the loan. |
When we transfer a loan to nonaccruing status, we allocate a specific, associated amount to the
reserve for loan losses, in accordance with ASC 310, which incorporated SFAS No. 114, Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. We base most of these allocations on the underlying value
of the collateral supporting the loan. We also may consider the net present value of the loans
future cash flows and/or the observed market price of the loan.
We update our reserve allocations quarterly. If necessary, we adjust the reserve by increasing or
decreasing the provision for loan losses. For more information about how we establish the reserve,
read the loan loss reserve and loan loss provision section and Note
7, Reserve for loan losses, in
this report.
Loan recovery and credit review staff members analyze all problem credits on a quarterly basis to
determine collection potential and identify collateral deficiencies. If a collateral shortfall
exists, we typically revise the loans structure by requiring additional principal payments,
additional collateral, or additional support in the form of other guaranties, to the extent that
the loans documentation permits such remedies. If there is a collateral or cash flow shortfall on
an impaired loan, we record a specific reserve for loan losses in accordance with ASC 310.
Loan recovery and credit review staff members use the quarterly analyses of collection potential
and collateral deficiencies as a basis for recommending whether a loan should be charged off
partially or fully. We record charge-offs when both of the following conditions are present:
|
|
It is probable that we will not be able to collect the full amount of the loans principal. |
|
|
We can measure the amount of loss reliably. |
Page 84
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
If both of these conditions are not met, we maintain the estimated loss exposure as a specific
allocation in the reserve for loan losses.
When we transfer a property to OREO through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, we analyze
the propertys value to determine if a charge-off is necessary to bring the loan to the fair value
of the property, less cost to sell, at the time we take possession.
How we determine collateral valuations for problem credits secured with real estate
Our lenders obtain updated valuations, regardless of loan size, any time they believe there has
been an obvious and material deterioration in market conditions, project performance, or physical
aspects of the property itself that could jeopardize our collateral position. We assess the need
for revaluation when the amount of the loan is $500,000 or more and one or more of the following
conditions exists:
|
|
The client relationship manager recommends we renew or extend the loan. |
|
|
The loan is downgraded to a risk rating of substandard or lower. |
|
|
The loan has had a watchlist rating for 18 months. |
Appraisal staff members collect and analyze data that we use to determine the reliability of
appraisals. These data include internal and external reports on trends in real estate valuation,
appreciation and depreciation, absorption rates, lease rates, occupancy rates, capitalization
rates, and information we obtain from appraisal reviews and conversations with third-party
appraisers and other market participants. We assess real estate market changes on a quarterly
basis in meetings led by staff members who maintain their Member, Appraisal Institute (MAI)
credentials. The MAI is the highest professional designation a commercial property appraiser can
achieve.
If the data we collect indicate it is probable that the value of a particular property type
remained stable or appreciated over the time period under consideration, we do not require a new
appraisal. If the data indicate probable deterioration in value, we require a new appraisal.
Appraisal staff members review the valuations of substandard loans secured with real estate
annually. If we determine that the most recent appraisal no longer represents the fair value for a
property, we obtain a new appraisal or evaluation to substantiate the propertys value.
Page 85
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Key credit risk metrics
The key measures we use to evaluate our exposure to credit risk are the internal risk rating
classifications, levels of loans past due 90 days or more, levels of nonperforming assets, net
charge-offs, the net charge-off ratio, the reserve for loan losses, and the provision for loan
losses.
We believe the most relevant measure of credit quality is the net charge-off ratio, which expresses
loan charge-offs minus loan recoveries as a percentage of total loans outstanding. We believe this
ratio offers a better basis for analyzing our credit quality than:
|
|
Nonaccruing loan amounts, because we do not automatically charge off nonaccruing loans
after a certain amount of time elapses, unless the loan is collateral-dependent as defined by
ASC 310. If we believe it is likely that the loan can return to performing status, we prefer
to work with the borrower to resolve payment problems. |
|
|
Charge-off dollar amounts, because increases or decreases in net charge-off dollar amounts
may not correspond directly to increases or decreases in outstanding loan balances. |
|
|
Other measures of credit quality, because they do not convey the nature of our client
relationships or our pursuit of repayment even after we classify loans as nonaccruing or
charge them off. |
Historically, compared to many other banks, our nonperforming asset levels have been higher, but
our net charge-offs have been lower. This is because:
|
|
We prefer to work with borrowers to resolve repayment problems. This includes
renegotiating loan terms and conditions, and exploring other repayment options. |
|
|
Many borrowers with nonperforming loans continue to operate their businesses, and we
believe it is likely that many of these loans will return to performing status within a
timeframe that is acceptable to us. |
|
|
When necessary, we believe that moving properties to OREO is a positive step in the loan
work-out process, because: |
|
|
|
We gain control of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
Legal expenses associated with collection efforts cease. |
|
|
|
|
We gain the ability to facilitate disposition of these properties and recover our cash. |
|
|
|
|
We can then redeploy that cash into loans or other earning assets. |
In our commercial portfolio, charge-offs are very unpredictable, because:
|
|
Negotiations with borrowers can affect the timing and extent of charge-offs, or avert them
altogether. |
|
|
Associated legal proceedings can affect the timing and amount of charge-offs or recoveries. |
Page 86
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In our residential mortgage portfolio, charge-offs are practically nonexistent, because:
|
|
We sell most of our newly originated fixed rate residential mortgages into the secondary
market. |
|
|
We do not make subprime, Alt-A, or any other so-called exotic residential mortgage loans. |
Even after we charge loans off, we continue to pursue repayment. When we receive repayments on
charged-off loans, we record them as loan recoveries.
Credit quality in the first quarter of 2010
Nonperforming assets increased during the 2010 first quarter, as did loans past due 90 days or
more. The provision for loan losses, net charge-offs, and the net charge-off ratio, although higher
than the 2009 first quarter, were all lower than for the 2009 fourth quarter. Despite some positive
trends in the economy, economic conditions in Delaware are improving more slowly than elsewhere in
the mid-Atlantic region.
The ratios in the table below illustrate how credit quality has changed over the past 12 months.
The events and business conditions that caused the changes in these ratios are discussed in detail
in the sections that follow.
Selected credit quality ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
Loan loss reserve ratio |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
1.77 |
% |
Nonperforming assets ratio (including OREO) |
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more ratio |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
Quarterly net charge-off ratio (not annualized) |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
Annualized net charge-off ratio |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
1.21 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Serious-doubt loan ratio |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.56 |
% |
The loan loss reserve ratio differs from the nonperforming asset ratio because:
|
|
An assets nonperformance does not automatically generate a partial or total loss. |
|
|
|
The denominator of the nonperforming asset ratio includes OREO. |
Page 87
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Internal risk rating analysis
In our internal risk rating analysis, the percentage of credits with pass ratings declined to
79.31% at quarter-end from 81.29% at year-end, while the percentage with a substandard rating
increased to 12.50% from 11.31% at year-end. Ratings downgrades occurred in all portfolios but were
most prevalent in the commercial loan categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal risk rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 9/30/09 |
|
|
At 6/30/09 |
|
Pass |
|
|
79.31 |
% |
|
|
81.29 |
% |
|
|
83.86 |
% |
|
|
86.47 |
% |
Watchlist |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
6.64 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Substandard |
|
|
12.50 |
% |
|
|
11.31 |
% |
|
|
9.18 |
% |
|
|
7.22 |
% |
Doubtful/loss |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
An increase in commercial construction loans past due 90 days or more accounted for most of the
$9.1 million first quarter increase in loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing. Most of
the increase was associated with commercial construction loans that are performing, have matured
but have not paid off, and for which underwriting extensions are underway. The increase in
commercial mortgage loans past due 90 days or more was due to three commercial clients, two home builders, and one business that
supports the housing industry. The decrease in consumer and other retail loans past due 90 days or
more was associated with a home equity loan to a commercial banking client that moved to nonaccrual
during the quarter.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Commercial real estate construction |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Consumer and other retail |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans past due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of loans past due 90 days to
total loans outstanding |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
Nonperforming assets
Nonperforming assets consist of:
|
|
Nonaccruing loans. These are loans for which we do not expect to receive principal or
interest payments according to contractual terms. This category includes troubled
restructured loans that are nonaccruing. |
|
|
Troubled restructured loans (accruing). These are loans for which we and the borrower have
renegotiated terms or conditions. |
|
|
OREO, which consists of properties we acquire through foreclosure or when the borrower
defaults. We record these properties at their fair value, less cost to sell. |
Page 88
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Nonperforming assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
Nonaccruing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
$ |
91.2 |
|
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
|
$ |
64.5 |
|
Commercial real estate construction |
|
|
246.8 |
|
|
|
264.8 |
|
|
|
114.2 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
Consumer and other retail |
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccruing loans |
|
|
468.9 |
|
|
|
455.6 |
|
|
|
230.2 |
|
Troubled restructured loans (accruing) |
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccruing and troubled restructured loans |
|
|
504.6 |
|
|
|
484.1 |
|
|
|
231.3 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
550.9 |
|
|
$ |
518.7 |
|
|
$ |
251.1 |
|
Nonperforming asset ratio (includes OREO) |
|
|
6.29 |
% |
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
Total nonaccruing loans increased $13.3 million or 3% from year-end 2009.
|
|
|
Most of the increase in nonaccruing loans was in commercial mortgage loans, which rose
$14.3 million in the 2010 first quarter. Four credits accounted for the majority of this
increase. One was to a Pennsylvania-based operator of self-storage facilities. The others
were to Delaware-based owners of retail properties and low-rise professional office
buildings. |
|
|
|
|
Three Pennsylvania-based credits accounted for the majority of the $10.3 million
increase in nonaccruing CFA loans in the 2010 first quarter. One was to the previously
mentioned operator of self-storage facilities. The others were to a food services provider
and a lighting design company. |
|
|
|
|
Most of the increase in nonperforming consumer and other retail loans was associated
with a home equity loan to a commercial banking client. |
|
|
|
Nonperforming commercial real estate construction loans decreased $18.0 million during
the 2010 first quarter. Charge-offs accounted for approximately $12.1 million of this
decrease. The remainder reflected transfers to OREO. |
Page 89
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Troubled restructured loans (accruing) at March 31, 2010, were $35.7 million, an increase of $7.2
million from year-end 2009. One credit to a plumbing supply company in southern Delaware accounted
for almost all of this increase.
OREO totaled $46.3 million at March 31, 2010, up $11.7 million from year-end 2009. Three credits
to residential developers with projects in southern Delaware accounted for this increase. We are
working with other developers to prepare these properties for sale. The composition of OREO
balances on a percentage basis remained similar to year-end.
Composition of our OREO balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Commercial properties |
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
Residential properties |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OREO |
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
The continued economic pressure in the mid-Atlantic region contributed to net charge-offs of $29.1
million for the 2010 first quarter and a net charge-off ratio of 0.33%, compared to 0.22% in the
2009 first quarter.
The largest single charge-off was a $5.6 million partial charge-off of two commercial construction
projects related to a single builder that were transferred to OREO during the quarter. The
construction projects are residential housing developments in southern Delaware. Most of the other
commercial loan charge-offs were for residential projects in southern Delaware or for businesses
that support the housing industry.
Consumer and other retail loan net charge-offs for the 2010 first quarter were down from the 2009
first quarter. Consumer and other retail net charge-offs consisted primarily of home equity loans
and indirect auto loans.
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Q1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Q1 |
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
Commercial real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other retail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans charged off |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(21.2 |
) |
Net charge-off ratio (not annualized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
For more detail on gross charge-offs and recoveries, see the loan loss reserve and loan loss
provision discussion at the end of this section.
Page 90
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Serious-doubt loans
Serious-doubt loans are loans that were performing in accordance with their contractual terms, or
were fewer than 90 days past due, at the time of classification, but which we think have a
probability of becoming nonperforming loans in the future. Most of our serious-doubt loans are
commercial construction loans and CFA loans. Some of the CFA loans that were classified as
serious-doubt are to providers of products and services to the construction industry.
At
March 31, 2010, the amount of serious-doubt loans was $27.3 million higher than at year-end
2009. Four commercial credit customers made up the majority of the increase in serious-doubt loans
during the quarter.
Serious-doubt loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
|
At |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
|
6/30/09 |
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
24.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
Commercial real estate construction |
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other retail |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Contingency allocation |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total serious-doubt loans |
|
$ |
82.2 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
$ |
68.4 |
|
|
$ |
57.9 |
|
Serious-doubt loan ratio |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
LOAN LOSS RESERVE AND LOAN LOSS PROVISION
A combination of risk rating downgrades, higher nonperforming loans, and continued uncertainty in
parts of the mid-Atlantic economy, led to increases in both the reserve and provision for loan
losses. The reserve for loan loss as a percentage of total loans was 3.44% at March 31, 2010,
compared to 2.80% at year-end 2009, while the provision for loan losses was $77.4 million for the
2010 first quarter, compared to $29.5 million for the prior year first quarter.
Loan loss reserve composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
|
At 3/31/09 |
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
65.9 |
|
|
$ |
52.4 |
|
Commercial real estate construction |
|
|
127.3 |
|
|
|
100.8 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Consumer and other retail |
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
299.8 |
|
|
$ |
251.5 |
|
|
$ |
167.0 |
|
Page 91
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The loan loss reserve and provision represent what we believe are reasonable assessments of our
known, estimated, and inherent loan losses. In assessing these risks, we make subjective judgments
about the likelihood that loans will be repaid and unpaid amounts we might be able to recover. We
also consider increases and decreases in loan balances, the results of the internal risk rating
analysis, the levels of loan recoveries and repayments, the stability of the mid-Atlantic regional
economy, market interest rates, regulatory guidelines, and other factors.
We believe our process provides the best estimate of required reserves at each reporting date. The
process we use to calculate the reserve has provided an appropriate reserve over an extended period
of time, and we believe that our methodology is sound. However, our process is under continuous
evaluation and, as market conditions and trends change, we may make changes to our loan loss
reserve methodology in the future.
The reserve and provision for loan losses do not necessarily increase in conjunction with loan
growth, because newly added loans do not automatically carry the same or a higher degree of risk
than loans already in the portfolio.
Determining the reserve is an inherently subjective process. Estimates we make, including
estimates of the amounts and timing of payments we expect to receive on impaired loans, may be
susceptible to significant change. If actual circumstances differ substantially from the
assumptions used to determine the reserve, future adjustments to the reserve may be necessary.
This could have a materially adverse effect on our financial performance and condition. For more
information about how we establish and account for the loan loss reserve, read Note 2, Summary of
significant accounting policies, and Note 8, Reserve for loan losses, in our 2009 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
DERIVATIVES, HEDGING INSTRUMENTS, OTHER OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS, AND OTHER CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We use a variety of financial instruments and contracts to help us manage capital, liquidity,
interest rate risk, credit risk, and other aspects of our day-to-day operations. As permissible
under regulatory guidelines, we include these instruments in our calculations of regulatory
risk-based capital ratios. For more information about these instruments and contracts, read the
discussion that begins on page 61 of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The derivative instruments we use are primarily interest rate swap and interest rate floor
contracts. These instruments help us manage the effects of fluctuating interest rates on net
interest income. We also use interest rate swap contracts to help commercial loan clients manage
their interest rate risk. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
purposes.
Page 92
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
When we enter into an interest rate swap contract with a commercial loan client, we simultaneously
enter into a mirror swap contract in the same amount with a third party. This practice allows a
client to swap floating rates for fixed rates. We then mirror the client swap by swapping, with a
third party, the fixed rate for a floating rate. We retain the associated credit risk in these
transactions.
At March 31, 2010, we had interest rate swap contracts associated with loans to clients with a
total notional amount of $1,488.4 million, including the mirror swaps described above. For more
information about our derivative and hedging instruments, read Note 6, Derivatives and hedging
activities, in this report.
Other contractual obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
FHLB loan 1 |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
Lease commitments for offices, net of sublease arrangements 2 |
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
2,235.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,408.1 |
|
Letters of credit, unfunded lending commitments, and unadvanced lines
of credit |
|
$ |
3,136.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,136.4 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
We used these funds to construct Wilmington Trust Plaza, our operations center in downtown
Wilmington, Delaware, which was completed in 1998. |
|
2 |
|
These lease commitments are for many of our branch offices in Delaware and all of our
branch and non-branch offices outside of Delaware. |
Amount and duration of payments due on current contractual obligations as of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
More than 5 |
|
(in millions) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
2,235.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,685.9 |
|
|
$ |
452.7 |
|
|
$ |
92.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Debt obligations |
|
|
478.0 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Interest on debt obligations |
|
|
181.7 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Benefit plan obligations |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,969.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,767.4 |
|
|
$ |
529.3 |
|
|
$ |
396.2 |
|
|
$ |
276.9 |
|
Page 93
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The debt obligations in the table above consist of:
|
|
$250.0 million of subordinated long-term debt that was issued in 2003, was used for general
liquidity purposes, and is due in 2013. |
|
|
|
$200.0 million of subordinated long-term debt that was issued on April 1, 2008, and is due
on April 2, 2018. We used part of the proceeds of this issue to repay an aggregate principal
amount of $125.0 million in subordinated long-term debt that expired on May 1, 2008, and to
fund, in part, the acquisition of AST Capital Trust Company. We are using the remaining
proceeds for general corporate purposes. |
|
|
|
FHLB advances of $28.0 million. |
Both of our issues of subordinated long-term debt are included in the Long-term debt line of our
balance sheet. We may not incur additional debt without prior written approval from our primary
regulators. Wilmington Trust Company may not incur additional debt having a maturity of more than
one year without prior written approval from its primary regulators.
Contractual obligations in the table above do not include uncertain tax liabilities that we have
not paid. At March 31, 2010, we had unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect
our effective tax rate in future periods. The amounts that we ultimately may pay, and when we
ultimately may pay them, remain uncertain. For more information on our income taxes, read Note 13,
Income taxes, in this report, and Note 20, Income taxes, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Our agreements with CRM and RCM permit principal members and designated key employees of each firm,
subject to certain restrictions, to put (relinquish) their interests in their respective firms to
us. For more information about these agreements, read Note 4, Affiliates and acquisitions, in
our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OTHER INFORMATION
Accounting pronouncements
For a discussion of the effects of recent accounting pronouncements on our financial condition and
results of operations, read Note 15, Accounting pronouncements, in this report.
Page 94
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Critical accounting policies and estimates
Our critical accounting policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP),
and with reporting practices prescribed for the banking industry. We maintain our accounting
records and prepare our financial statements using the accrual basis of accounting. In applying
our critical accounting policies, we make estimates and assumptions about revenue recognition, the
reserve for loan losses, stock-based employee compensation, investment securities valuations,
goodwill impairment, loan origination fees, income taxes, and other items. For more information
about our critical accounting policies, read:
|
|
Note 2, Summary of significant accounting policies, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K; |
|
|
|
Note 1, Accounting and reporting policies, in this report; and |
|
|
|
Note 15, Accounting pronouncements, in this report. |
Cautionary statement
This report contains estimates, predictions, opinions, and other statements that might be construed
as forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements include references to our financial goals, dividend policy, financial and business
trends, new business results and outlook, business prospects, market positioning, pricing trends,
strategic initiatives, credit quality and the reserve for loan losses, the effects of changes in
market interest rates, the effects of changes in securities valuations, the effects of accounting
pronouncements, and other internal and external factors that could affect our financial
performance.
These statements are based on a number of assumptions, estimates, expectations, and assessments of
potential developments, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our
actual results to differ from our expectations. Our ability to achieve the results reflected in
these statements could be affected adversely by, among other things, changes in national or
regional economic conditions; changes in market interest rates; fluctuations in equity or fixed
income markets; significant changes in banking laws or regulations; changes in accounting policies,
procedures, or guidelines; increased competition for business; higher-than-expected credit losses;
the effects of acquisitions; the effects of integrating acquired entities; a substantial and
permanent loss of either client accounts and/or assets under management at Wilmington Trust and/or
our affiliate money managers, Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn and Roxbury Capital Management; changes in
the regulatory, judicial, legislative, or tax treatment of business transactions; new litigation or
developments in existing litigation; and economic uncertainty created by unrest in other parts of
the world.
Page 95
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The normal course of business exposes us to a variety of operational, reputational, legal, and
regulatory risks, which we monitor closely to safeguard our clients assets and our companys
assets. Our primary risks are credit risk, interest rate risk, financial market risk, and economic
risk. All of these risks could affect our financial performance and condition adversely. For more
information about these risks, read the credit quality discussion in this report and the risk
discussion and Item 1A in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Market interest rates present more risk to us than inflation. As a financial institution, nearly
all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Their values are more likely to be
eroded by changes in market interest rates than by the effects of inflation on currency valuations.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Changes in market interest rates, and the pace at which they occur, can affect the yields we earn
on loans and investments and the rates we pay on deposits and other borrowings. These changes can
compress our net interest margin and reduce net interest income.
We have more floating rate assets than floating rate liabilities, and our interest rate risk
position is asset sensitive. In general, this means that:
|
|
In a rising market interest rate environment, our net interest income is more likely to
increase. |
|
|
|
In a declining market interest rate environment, our net interest income is more likely to
decrease. |
When market interest rates change, our floating rate assets reprice more quickly than our deposits,
because:
|
|
The pricing adjusts on most of our floating rate loans within 30 to 45 days of a rate
change. |
|
|
|
The rates on noninterest-bearing demand deposits do not adjust with market rate changes. |
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit have fixed rates and typically take more than six months to mature. |
Our interest rate risk management objective is to minimize reductions in net interest income that
might result from changes in market interest rates. To mitigate interest rate risk, we:
|
|
Maintain a mix of assets and liabilities that gives us flexibility in a dynamic
marketplace. |
|
|
|
Manage the relative proportion of fixed and floating rate assets and liabilities so we can
manage their repricing characteristics as closely as possible. |
|
|
|
Manage the size of our investment securities portfolio and the mix of instruments in it.
For more information about this, read Note 10, Investment securities, in this report. |
|
|
|
Sell most newly originated fixed rate residential mortgages into the secondary market. By
limiting the fixed rate residential mortgages in our loan portfolio, we eliminate much of the
long-term risk inherent in holding instruments with fixed rates and 15- to 30-year maturities. |
Page 96
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
|
Prefer to manage our exposure to fixed rate mortgages through our investment securities
portfolio. The mortgage-backed instruments in our investment securities portfolio typically
have shorter maturity and duration characteristics than a portfolio of individual mortgage
loans. |
|
|
|
Use derivative instruments. For more information about this, read the discussion of
off-balance-sheet arrangements and contractual obligations and Note 6, Derivative and hedging
activities, in this report. |
To achieve our interest rate risk management objective, we follow guidelines set by an interest
rate risk policy that is approved annually by our Board of Directors. Under the current policy,
our objective is to limit any reduction in net interest income from changes in market interest
rates to less than 10% in any 12-month period.
The primary tool we use to assess our exposure to interest rate risk is a computer modeling
technique that simulates how gradual and sustained changes in market interest rates might affect
net interest income. We perform simulations quarterly that compare a stable interest rate
environment to multiple hypothetical interest rate scenarios. As a rule, our model employs
scenarios in which rates gradually move up or down 250 basis points over a period of 10 months.
We believe the primary measure of interest rate risk management is the net interest margin. For
more information about our interest rate risk position and management strategies, read the interest
rate risk discussion in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 97
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk in the first three months of 2010
We remained asset sensitive in the first three months of 2010. At March 31, 2010, approximately
$5.7 billion of commercial loans were repricing within 30 or fewer days, while approximately $958.6
million of non-core funding was repricing in 90 or fewer days.
Loan and deposit repricing characteristics as a percentage of total loan balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 3/31/10 |
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
Total loans outstanding with floating rates |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
Commercial loans with floating rates |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
Floating rate commercial loans tied to a prime rate |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
Floating rate commercial loans tied to the 30-day LIBOR |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
Non-core funding maturing in < 90 days |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
The net interest margin for the 2010 first quarter was 3.03%, compared with 2.87% for the 2009
first quarter. For more information about this, read the net interest margin discussion and the
analysis of changes in interest income and expense due to volume and rate, which appear between the
discussions of Regional Banking and noninterest income in this report.
As of March 31, 2010, our interest rate risk simulation model projected that, if short-term rates
were to increase gradually over a 10-month period in a series of moves that totaled 250 basis
points, our net interest income would increase 12.64% over the 12 months beginning March 31, 2010.
We discontinued modeling the declining rate scenario in December 2008, after the FOMC included zero
percent in its target rate range, since the declining rate scenario would have created negative
interest rates in the model.
Simulated effect of interest rate changes on net interest income for the 12 months beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
Gradual increase of 250 basis points |
|
|
12.64 |
% |
|
|
10.84 |
% |
Our discussion of the interest rate risk simulation model contains forward-looking statements about
the anticipated effects on net interest income that may result from hypothetical changes in market
interest rates. Assumptions about loan and deposit growth, loan and core deposit rates, loan
prepayments, asset-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations play a significant
role in our interest rate simulations. Our assumptions about rates and the pace of changes in
payments differ for assets and liabilities in rising as well as in declining rate environments.
These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and the simulations cannot predict precisely how actual
interest rate changes might affect our net interest income.
Page 98
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FINANCIAL MARKET RISK
We define financial market risk as the risk that declines in equity and debt market valuations
could reduce the fees we receive for providing asset management, custody, and other services. Most
WAS revenue, some CCS revenue, and all of the revenue we receive from affiliate money managers CRM
and RCM are based on the market values of assets in client portfolios. Equity and debt markets
determine these values. Fluctuations in one or both of these markets can increase or decrease
revenue that is based on asset valuations.
The amount of total revenue subject to financial market risk was higher for the 2010 first quarter
than for the corresponding period in 2009 because revenue from CCS and the affiliate money managers
was higher.
On a percentage basis, revenue subject to financial market risk was higher for the 2010 first
quarter than for the corresponding period in 2009 because net interest income (after the provision)
was lower.
These changes in revenue are discussed more fully in earlier sections of this report.
Revenue subject to financial market risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
Q1 |
|
|
Q1 |
|
Wealth Advisory Services (WAS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment advisory fees |
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
Mutual fund fees |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total WAS revenue subject to financial market risk |
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
Total WAS revenue |
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Client Services (CCS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement services |
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
Investment/cash management services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CCS revenue subject to financial market risk |
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
Total CCS revenue |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate money managers revenue |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue subject to financial market risk |
|
$ |
65.1 |
|
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
Total net interest and noninterest income 1 |
|
$ |
86.8 |
|
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
Percent of total net interest and noninterest income subject to
financial market risk 1 |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
After amortization and the provision for loan losses |
Our investment securities portfolio is also subject to financial market risk, because financial
markets determine the valuations of those investments. For more information about income from the
investment securities portfolio, see the quarterly and year-to-date analyses of earnings, which
appear in this report between the discussions of the net interest margin and noninterest income.
Page 99
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ECONOMIC RISK
Changes in economic conditions could change demand for the services we provide and, ultimately,
affect loan and deposit balances, revenue, net income, and our overall results negatively.
Among our businesses, Regional Banking has the most exposure to economic risk. Most of that risk
is tied to economic conditions within the mid-Atlantic region, where our Regional Banking business
is focused. We believe this exposure is mitigated by the regions diversified economy, which
provides a degree of economic stability and helps the region withstand the effects of downturns in
any single sector. We discuss the regional economy in more detail in the Regional Banking section
of this report.
Changes in economic conditions at the national and international level that eliminate or slow
demand for our services could affect all of our businesses, loan and deposit balances, revenue, net
income, and overall results.
OTHER RISK
For more information about our credit, interest rate, financial market, economic, operational,
fiduciary, regulatory, and legal risk, read the Risk Factors section that begins on page 8 of our
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Page 100
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our chairman and chief executive officer, as well as our chief financial officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010, pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, they concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in alerting them on a timely basis to any
material information about our company (including our consolidated subsidiaries) that we are
required to include in the periodic filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of
2010 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to have a material effect on, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Page 101
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We and our subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in
the ordinary course of business. Some of these proceedings may seek relief or damages in amounts
that may be substantial. Because these proceedings are complex, many years may pass before they
are resolved, and it is not feasible to predict their outcomes. Some of these proceedings involve
claims that we believe may be covered by insurance, and we have advised our insurance carriers
accordingly.
As of March 31, 2010, we believed there were no outstanding legal matters that, upon their ultimate
resolution, would have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There were no changes in our risk factors from those disclosed on pages 8 to 13 in our 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
We had no unregistered sales of equity securities in the first quarter of 2010.
Issuer purchases of equity securities
We did not acquire or repurchase any of our shares during the first quarter of 2010 under our
current 8-million-share repurchase plan that was authorized by our Board of Directors in April
2002. At March 31, 2010, there were 4,956,204 shares available under this program. We agreed not
to repurchase our stock without prior written approval from our regulators. In addition, until
December 12, 2011, or until the U.S. Treasury no longer holds any of the Series A preferred stock
we issued under the CPP, whichever is earlier, we are not permitted to repurchase any of our common
stock, subject to certain exceptions, without prior approval of our regulators. Shares repurchased
in the table below include shares we received when recipients of stock-based compensation tender
their shares to exercise their options or to cover payroll taxes on restricted stock vesting.
In the table below, the data in column (d) include shares available under all compensation plans,
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, repurchase plans, and other activities, including stock grants
and forfeitures, that could affect the maximum number of shares that we may purchase.
Page 102
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Share repurchase activity in the first quarter of 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Maximum number (or |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
shares (or units) |
|
|
appropriate dollar value) of |
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
purchased as part of |
|
|
shares (or units) that may |
|
|
|
shares (or units) |
|
|
paid per share |
|
|
publicly announced |
|
|
yet be purchased under the |
|
Period |
|
purchased |
|
|
(or unit) |
|
|
plans or programs |
|
|
plans or programs |
|
Month #1: January 1 - 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,340,709 |
|
Month #2: February 1 - 28, 2010 |
|
|
6,031 |
|
|
$ |
14.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,128,353 |
|
Month #3: March 1 - 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
$ |
15.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,088,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,024 |
|
|
$ |
14.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,088,190 |
|
Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is limited by our participation in the CPP, other
regulatory restrictions, and our own prudent capital management policies. Our policy is not to pay
dividends that would reduce our regulatory capital ratios below the level required for us to
qualify as a well-capitalized financial institution. For more information about these regulatory
capital ratios, read Note 12, Capital and the capital resources section in this report as well as
the capital resources section in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Wilmington Trust Company may not pay any dividends to us that would cause its regulatory capital
ratios to fall below the minimum levels required for it to remain a well-capitalized institution
under the applicable regulatory capital standards, or the minimum levels required under its
internal capital plan, whichever are higher, without prior written approval from its regulators.
For more information about our dividends and restrictions on our ability to pay them, read the
capital resources section, Item 1A, Risk factors, and Note 16, Capital, in our 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
For more information about our dividend, read the executive summary in this report.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the 2010 first quarter.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
We have no information to report in addition to what is disclosed elsewhere in this report.
Page 103
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications* |
Page 104
Wilmington Trust Corporation and subsidiaries
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILMINGTON TRUST CORPORATION
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
/s/ Ted T. Cecala
|
|
|
Name: |
Ted T. Cecala |
|
|
Title: |
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
/s/ David R. Gibson
|
|
|
Name: |
David R. Gibson |
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
Page 105