Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Commission file number 1- 12874
TEEKAY CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor, Belvedere Building
69 Pitts Bay Road
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 41
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of U. S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
564,537 |
|
|
|
616,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
72,550 |
|
|
|
90,669 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (note 16) |
|
|
154,535 |
|
|
|
152,760 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
70,913 |
|
|
|
136,828 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
108,230 |
|
|
|
106,553 |
|
General and administrative (note 16) |
|
|
48,091 |
|
|
|
47,708 |
|
Loss on sale of vessels and equipment net of write-downs (note 13) |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
Restructuring charge (note 3) |
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
458,862 |
|
|
|
541,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
105,675 |
|
|
|
75,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(32,152 |
) |
|
|
(43,767 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
4,274 |
|
|
|
6,678 |
|
Realized and unrealized (loss) gain on non-designated derivative instruments (note 16) |
|
|
(87,847 |
) |
|
|
46,822 |
|
Equity (loss) income from joint ventures (note 11b) |
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
11,422 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (notes 8 and 16) |
|
|
29,026 |
|
|
|
11,312 |
|
Loss on bond repurchase (note 8) |
|
|
(12,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (note 14) |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before income taxes |
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
110,642 |
|
Income tax recovery (expense) (note 18) |
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
(5,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
104,774 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(27,933 |
) |
|
|
(23,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(14,002 |
) |
|
|
81,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share of Teekay Corporation (note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
1.12 |
|
Diluted (loss) earnings attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
1.12 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.3163 |
|
|
|
0.3163 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
72,788,591 |
|
|
|
72,516,193 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
72,788,591 |
|
|
|
72,745,781 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 8) |
|
|
635,361 |
|
|
|
422,510 |
|
Restricted cash (note 9) |
|
|
35,001 |
|
|
|
36,068 |
|
Accounts receivable, including non-trade of $36,007 (2009 $19,521) |
|
|
248,251 |
|
|
|
234,676 |
|
Vessels held for sale (note 13) |
|
|
16,725 |
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
Net investment in direct financing leases (note 4) |
|
|
27,661 |
|
|
|
27,210 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
106,452 |
|
|
|
96,549 |
|
Current portion of derivative assets (note 16) |
|
|
28,573 |
|
|
|
29,996 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
|
7,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,105,001 |
|
|
|
864,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long-term (note 9) |
|
|
573,256 |
|
|
|
579,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $1,760,671 (2009 $1,673,380) |
|
|
5,727,879 |
|
|
|
5,793,864 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated amortization of $146,850 (2009 $138,569)
(note 9) |
|
|
896,506 |
|
|
|
903,521 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (notes 11a and 11b) |
|
|
176,680 |
|
|
|
138,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
6,801,065 |
|
|
|
6,835,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing leases non-current (note 4) |
|
|
482,855 |
|
|
|
485,202 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
17,127 |
|
|
|
18,904 |
|
Loans to joint ventures, bearing interest between 4.4% to 6.5% |
|
|
20,384 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
Derivative assets (note 16) |
|
|
19,471 |
|
|
|
18,119 |
|
Deferred income tax asset (note 18) |
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
Investment in joint ventures (note 11b) |
|
|
137,422 |
|
|
|
139,790 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
131,902 |
|
|
|
130,624 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6) |
|
|
206,437 |
|
|
|
213,870 |
|
Goodwill (note 6) |
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
203,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
9,704,876 |
|
|
|
9,517,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
58,066 |
|
|
|
57,242 |
|
Accrued liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
262,316 |
|
|
|
289,757 |
|
Current portion of derivative liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
141,457 |
|
|
|
136,454 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
242,772 |
|
|
|
231,209 |
|
Current obligation under capital leases (note 9) |
|
|
40,942 |
|
|
|
41,016 |
|
Current portion of in-process revenue contracts (note 6) |
|
|
56,402 |
|
|
|
56,758 |
|
Loan from joint venture partners |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
802,085 |
|
|
|
813,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including amounts due to joint venture partners of $13,338 (2009 $16,410) (note 8) |
|
|
4,287,951 |
|
|
|
4,187,962 |
|
Long-term obligation under capital leases (note 9) |
|
|
736,002 |
|
|
|
743,254 |
|
Derivative liabilities (note 16) |
|
|
270,636 |
|
|
|
223,025 |
|
Deferred income tax liability (note 18) |
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
11,628 |
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
21,172 |
|
|
|
22,092 |
|
In-process revenue contracts (note 6) |
|
|
174,523 |
|
|
|
187,602 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
218,490 |
|
|
|
232,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,513,786 |
|
|
|
6,421,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 4, 9, 11 and 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interest (note 11d) |
|
|
43,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital ($0.001 par value; 725,000,000 shares authorized;
72,943,838 shares outstanding (2009 72,694,345); 73,443,038 shares issued (2009 73,193,545))
(note 10) |
|
|
668,155 |
|
|
|
656,193 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,566,592 |
|
|
|
1,585,431 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
918,642 |
|
|
|
855,580 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 15) |
|
|
(5,432 |
) |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,147,957 |
|
|
|
3,095,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
9,704,876 |
|
|
|
9,517,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
104,774 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
108,230 |
|
|
|
106,553 |
|
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts |
|
|
(13,435 |
) |
|
|
(19,055 |
) |
Loss (gain) on sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Write-down of intangible assets and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
Write-down of vessels and equipment |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on repurchase of bonds |
|
|
12,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss (income) |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
(11,442 |
) |
Income tax (recovery) expense |
|
|
(7,307 |
) |
|
|
5,868 |
|
Employee stock option compensation |
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
Foreign exchange gain and other |
|
|
(23,884 |
) |
|
|
(26,541 |
) |
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments |
|
|
49,763 |
|
|
|
(77,717 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities (note 7) |
|
|
(48,279 |
) |
|
|
58,261 |
|
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(3,695 |
) |
|
|
(8,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
94,781 |
|
|
|
136,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
771,249 |
|
|
|
182,872 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(9,565 |
) |
|
|
(332 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(38,413 |
) |
|
|
(47,500 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(609,928 |
) |
|
|
(261,250 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
Proceeds from loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
Repayment of loans from joint venture partner |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
6,734 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,524 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. units (note 5) |
|
|
94,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
Distribution from subsidiaries to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(33,083 |
) |
|
|
(26,154 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(22,999 |
) |
|
|
(22,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
151,621 |
|
|
|
(100,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures
for vessels and equipment (note 7) |
|
|
(44,696 |
) |
|
|
(171,303 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of vessels and equipment |
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
83,405 |
|
Investment in joint ventures |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
Advances to joint ventures |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Investment in direct financing lease assets |
|
|
(4,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Direct financing lease payments received |
|
|
4,827 |
|
|
|
5,596 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(33,551 |
) |
|
|
(80,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
212,851 |
|
|
|
(43,715 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
422,510 |
|
|
|
814,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
635,361 |
|
|
|
770,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (note 7)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN TOTAL EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thousands |
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Income |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
# |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
72,694 |
|
|
|
656,193 |
|
|
|
1,585,431 |
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
855,580 |
|
|
|
3,095,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,933 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
Pension adjustments, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
Unrealized net loss on qualifying cash
flow hedging instruments (note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
Realized net loss on qualifying cash
flow hedging instruments (note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,476 |
|
|
|
9,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,083 |
) |
|
|
(56,086 |
) |
Reinvested dividends |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
Employee stock option compensation and
other (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,985 |
|
Dilution gain on equity offering of
Teekay Offshore (note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,342 |
|
Dilution loss on initiation of majority
owned subsidiary (note 11d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,256 |
) |
|
|
(7,432 |
) |
Addition of non-controlling interest
from unit issuances and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,925 |
|
|
|
70,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
72,943 |
|
|
|
668,155 |
|
|
|
1,566,592 |
|
|
|
(5,432 |
) |
|
|
918,642 |
|
|
|
3,147,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 6 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
104,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
Pension adjustments |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
Unrealized loss on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Realized loss on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
|
|
10,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
9,576 |
|
|
|
115,397 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(27,476 |
) |
|
|
(25,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(17,900 |
) |
|
|
90,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP). They include the accounts of
Teekay Corporation (or Teekay), which is incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, and its wholly-owned or controlled subsidiaries (collectively, the Company).
Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial
statements have been omitted and, therefore, it is suggested that these interim financial
statements be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F. In the opinion of
management, these unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal recurring
nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Companys consolidated financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of those for a
full fiscal year. Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon
consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Given the current credit
markets, it is possible that the amounts recorded as derivative assets and liabilities could vary
by material amounts.
Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current period, primarily relating to the reclassification of unrecognized tax benefits of
$32.1 million at December 31, 2009 from accrued liabilities to other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets, and certain crew training expenses of $3.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from general and administrative expenses
to vessel operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Company adopted an amendment to Financial Accounting Standards Board (or FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (or ASC) 810, Consolidations that eliminates certain exceptions
to consolidating qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the
primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a
company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. This amendment also contains a
new requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect
on an entitys status as a variable interest entity, a companys power over a variable interest
entity, or a companys obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of an entity
must be disregarded. The elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept and its
consolidation exceptions means more entities will be subject to consolidation assessments and
reassessments. During February 2010, the scope of the revised standard was modified to indefinitely
exclude certain entities from the requirement to be assessed for consolidation. The adoption of
this amendment did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
2. Segment Reporting
The Company has four operating segments: its shuttle tanker and floating storage and offtake (or
FSO) segment (or Teekay Navion Shuttle Tankers and Offshore), its floating production, storage and
offloading (or FPSO) segment (or Teekay Petrojarl), its liquefied gas segment (or Teekay Gas
Services) and its conventional tanker segment (or Teekay Tanker Services). The Companys shuttle
tanker and FSO segment consists of shuttle tankers and FSO units. The Companys FPSO segment
consists of FPSO units and other vessels used to service its FPSO contracts. The Companys
liquefied gas segment consists of LNG and LPG carriers. The Companys conventional tanker segment
consists of conventional crude oil and product tankers that are subject to: long-term, fixed-rate
time-charter contracts; operate in the spot tanker market; or are subject to time-charters or
contracts of affreightment that are priced on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate
contracts. Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations. The accounting
policies applied to the reportable segments is the same as those used in the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Page 8 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The following tables present results for these segments for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (1) |
|
|
162,069 |
|
|
|
125,877 |
|
|
|
62,534 |
|
|
|
214,057 |
|
|
|
564,537 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
29,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
43,274 |
|
|
|
72,550 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
43,321 |
|
|
|
47,965 |
|
|
|
11,370 |
|
|
|
51,879 |
|
|
|
154,535 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,875 |
|
|
|
70,913 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,559 |
|
|
|
23,748 |
|
|
|
15,527 |
|
|
|
38,396 |
|
|
|
108,230 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
8,826 |
|
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
22,349 |
|
|
|
48,091 |
|
Loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
21,378 |
|
|
|
45,338 |
|
|
|
30,774 |
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
|
105,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of operating segments at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,700,867 |
|
|
|
1,201,301 |
|
|
|
2,836,617 |
|
|
|
2,844,239 |
|
|
|
8,583,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shuttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanker and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSO |
|
|
FPSO |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
155,688 |
|
|
|
86,103 |
|
|
|
57,583 |
|
|
|
317,177 |
|
|
|
616,551 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
18,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
71,969 |
|
|
|
90,669 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
45,784 |
|
|
|
44,429 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
50,760 |
|
|
|
152,760 |
|
Time charter hire expense |
|
|
32,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,650 |
|
|
|
136,828 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,252 |
|
|
|
25,779 |
|
|
|
14,598 |
|
|
|
36,924 |
|
|
|
106,553 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
13,129 |
|
|
|
9,786 |
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
19,635 |
|
|
|
47,708 |
|
Loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of
write-downs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
14,175 |
|
|
|
6,109 |
|
|
|
23,566 |
|
|
|
31,667 |
|
|
|
75,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of operating segments at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,696,664 |
|
|
|
1,309,747 |
|
|
|
2,910,847 |
|
|
|
2,879,882 |
|
|
|
8,797,140 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
FPSO segment includes $30 million in revenue related to operations in previous years as a
result of executing a contract amendment during the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Total assets of all segments |
|
|
8,583,024 |
|
|
|
8,640,315 |
|
Cash and restricted cash |
|
|
635,361 |
|
|
|
422,510 |
|
Accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
486,491 |
|
|
|
454,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
9,704,876 |
|
|
|
9,517,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Restructuring Charge
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company incurred $3.8 million of restructuring
costs. The restructuring costs primarily relate to the reflagging of certain vessels, crew changes,
and global staffing changes. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $nil and $2.0 million,
respectively, of restructuring liability were recorded in accrued
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
Page 9 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
4. Operating and Direct Financing Leases
Operating Lease Obligations
Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary
As at March 31, 2010, the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary was a party to operating leases (or Head
Leases) whereby it is the lessor and is leasing its two LNG carriers (or the Tangguh LNG Carriers)
to a third party company. The Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary is then leasing back the LNG carriers from
the same third party company (or Subleases). Under the terms of these leases, the third party
company claims tax depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to lease the vessels. As is
typical in these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by the Teekay
Tangguh Subsidiary. Lease payments under the Subleases are based on certain tax and financial
assumptions at the commencement of the leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the third
party company is entitled to increase the lease payments under the Sublease to maintain its agreed
after-tax margin. The Teekay Tangguh Subsidiarys carrying amount of this tax indemnification is
$10.7 million at March 31, 2010, and is included as part of other long-term liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Company. The tax indemnification is for the
duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the years it would take for the lease
payments to be statute barred, and ends in 2034. Although there is no maximum potential amount of
future payments, the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary may terminate the lease arrangements on a voluntary
basis at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, the Teekay Tangguh Subsidiary will be
required to pay termination sums to the third party company sufficient to repay the third party
companys investment in the vessels and to compensate it for the tax effect of the terminations,
including recapture of any tax depreciation. The Head Leases and the Subleases have 20 year terms
and are classified as operating leases. The Head Lease and the Sublease for each of the two Tangguh
LNG Carriers commenced in November 2008 and March 2009, respectively.
As at March 31, 2010, the total estimated future minimum rental payments to be received and paid
under the lease contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Lease |
|
|
Sublease |
|
Year |
|
Receipts(1) |
|
|
Payments(1) |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
21,667 |
|
|
$ |
18,804 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
28,860 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
28,828 |
|
|
$ |
25,072 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
303,735 |
|
|
$ |
357,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
440,808 |
|
|
$ |
476,479 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Head Leases are fixed-rate operating leases while the Subleases are
variable-rate operating leases. |
Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases
The time-charters for two of the Companys LNG carriers, one FSO unit and equipment that reduce
volatile organic compound emissions (or VOC equipment) are accounted for as direct financing
leases. The following table lists the components of the net investments in direct financing leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received |
|
|
849,903 |
|
|
|
869,268 |
|
Estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased properties |
|
|
203,465 |
|
|
|
203,465 |
|
Initial direct costs and other |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
Less unearned revenue |
|
|
(544,785 |
) |
|
|
(561,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
510,516 |
|
|
|
512,412 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
27,661 |
|
|
|
27,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
482,855 |
|
|
|
485,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2010, minimum lease payments to be received by the Company in each of the next five
succeeding fiscal years are approximately $53.1 million (remainder of 2010), $68.2 million (2011),
$62.0 million (2012), $49.5 million (2013) and $48.1 million (2014). The VOC equipment lease is
scheduled to expire in 2014, the FSO contract is scheduled to expire in 2017, and the LNG
time-charters are both scheduled to expire in 2029.
Page 10 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, other than share data)
5. Equity Offerings by Subsidiaries
During March 2010, the Companys subsidiary Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (or Teekay Offshore)
completed a public offering of 5.06 million common units (including 660,000 units issued upon the
exercise of the underwriters overallotment option) at a price of $19.48 per unit, for total gross
proceeds of $100.6 million (including the general partners $2.0 million proportionate capital
contribution). As a result, the Companys ownership of Teekay Offshore was reduced from 40.5% to
35.9% (including the Companys 2% general partner interest). Teekay maintains control of Teekay
Offshore by virtue of its control of the general partner and continues to consolidate this
subsidiary. As a result of the offering, the Company recorded an increase to retained earnings of
$23.3 million, which represents the Companys dilution gain from the issuance of units in Teekay
Offshore during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
See Note 20 to these unaudited consolidated financial statements for information relating to a
follow-on public offering by the Companys subsidiary Teekay Tankers Ltd. (or Teekay Tankers) in
April 2010.
6. Intangible Assets and In-Process Revenue Contracts
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amortization Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
As at March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,251 |
|
|
|
(90,134 |
) |
|
|
34,117 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
230,668 |
|
|
|
(88,038 |
) |
|
|
142,630 |
|
Vessel purchase options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
|
(5,640 |
) |
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
390,249 |
|
|
|
(183,812 |
) |
|
|
206,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts of affreightment |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
124,251 |
|
|
|
(88,015 |
) |
|
|
36,236 |
|
Time-charter contracts |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
231,221 |
|
|
|
(83,823 |
) |
|
|
147,398 |
|
Vessel purchase options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,900 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
20,731 |
|
|
|
(14,395 |
) |
|
|
6,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
400,103 |
|
|
|
(186,233 |
) |
|
|
213,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2010, was
$7.2 million (2009 $8.5 million), which is included in depreciation and amortization.
Amortization of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is expected to be $18.7 million
(remainder of 2010), $23.2 million (2011), $31.4 million (2012), $14.2 million (2013), $13.2
million (2014) and $105.7 million (thereafter).
In-Process Revenue Contracts
As part of the Companys previous acquisitions of Petrojarl ASA (subsequently renamed Teekay
Petrojarl AS, or Teekay Petrojarl) and OMI Corporation (or OMI), the Company assumed certain FPSO
service contracts and time charter-out contracts with terms that were less favorable than the then
prevailing market terms. The Company has recognized a liability based on the estimated fair value
of these contracts. The Company is amortizing this liability over the remaining terms of the
contracts on a weighted basis based on the projected revenue to be earned under the contracts.
Amortization of in-process revenue contracts for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $13.4
million (2009 $19.1 million), which is included in revenues on the consolidated statements of
income (loss). Amortization for the next five years is expected to be $34.2 million (remainder of
2010), $43.3 million (2011), $41.0 million (2012) and $37.6 million (2013), $26.3 million (2014)
and $48.5 million (thereafter).
7. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The changes in operating assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(13,575 |
) |
|
|
103,119 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(9,761 |
) |
|
|
15,034 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
(5,934 |
) |
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(25,767 |
) |
|
|
(53,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,279 |
) |
|
|
58,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, an unrelated party contributed a shuttle tanker with
a value of $35.0 million to a 67% owned subsidiary in exchange for an equity interest
of the subsidiary as described in Note 11(d) to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
This contribution has been treated as a non-cash transaction in the Companys consolidated
statement of cash flows.
Page 11 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
8. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facilities |
|
|
1,958,314 |
|
|
|
1,975,360 |
|
Senior Notes (8.875%) due July 15, 2011 |
|
|
25,551 |
|
|
|
177,004 |
|
Senior Notes (8.5%) due January 15, 2020 |
|
|
446,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
USD-denominated Term Loans due through 2022 |
|
|
1,701,081 |
|
|
|
1,837,980 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
386,076 |
|
|
|
412,417 |
|
USD-denominated Unsecured Demand Loan due to Joint Venture Partners |
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
16,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,530,723 |
|
|
|
4,419,171 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
242,772 |
|
|
|
231,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,287,951 |
|
|
|
4,187,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had fourteen long-term revolving credit facilities (or the
Revolvers) available, which, as at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $3.5 billion, of
which $1.5 billion was undrawn. Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins; at March 31,
2010, the margins ranged between 0.45% and 3.25% (2009 0.45% and 3.25%). At March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the three-month LIBOR was 0.29% and 0.25%, respectively. The total amount
available under the Revolvers reduces by $186.7 million (remainder of 2010), $239.2 million (2011),
$349.2 million (2012), $756.1 million (2013), $770.4 million (2014) and $1.2 billion (thereafter).
The Revolvers are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 63 of the Companys
vessels, together with other related security, and include a guarantee from Teekay or its
subsidiaries for all outstanding amounts.
In January 2010, the Company completed a public offering of $450 million senior unsecured notes due
January 15, 2020 (or the 8.5% Notes). The 8.5% Notes were sold at a price equal to 99.181% of par
and the discount is accreted using the effective interest rate of 8.625% per year. The Company
capitalized issuance costs of $8.6 million, which is recorded in other non-current assets in the
consolidated balance sheet, and is amortized over the term of the senior unsecured notes. The 8.5%
Notes and the 8.875% senior unsecured notes due July 15, 2011 (or the 8.875% Notes) rank equally in
right of payment with all of Teekays existing and future senior unsecured debt and senior to
Teekays existing and future subordinated debt. The 8.5% Notes and 8.875% Notes are not guaranteed
by any of Teekays subsidiaries and effectively rank behind all existing and future secured debt of
Teekay and other liabilities, secured and unsecured, of its subsidiaries. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, the Company repurchased a principal amount of $151.1 million (2009 $17.4
million) of the 8.875% Notes, using a portion of the proceeds of the 8.5% Notes offering, and
recognized a loss on repurchase of $12.1 million.
The Company may redeem the 8.5% Notes in whole or in part at any time before their maturity date at
a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 8.5% Notes to be
redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal
and interest on the 8.5% Notes to be redeemed (excluding accrued interest) discounted to the
redemption date on a semi-annual basis, plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date. In addition, at any time or from time to time prior to January 15, 2013, the
Company may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.5% Notes issued under the
indenture with the net cash proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings at a redemption
price equal to 108.5% of the principal amount of the 8.5% Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date; provided certain conditions are met.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had fifteen U.S. Dollar-denominated term loans outstanding, which
totaled $1.7 billion (2009 $1.8 billion). Certain of the term loans with a total outstanding
principal balance of $477.4 million, as at March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $480.1 million) bear
interest at a weighted-average fixed rate of 5.2% (December 31, 2009 5.2%). Interest payments on
the remaining term loans are based on LIBOR plus a margin. At March 31, 2010, the margins ranged
between 0.3% and 3.25% (December 31, 2009 0.3% and 3.25%). At March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the three-month LIBOR was 0.29% and 0.25%, respectively. The term loan payments are made in
quarterly or semi-annual payments commencing three or six months after delivery of each newbuilding
vessel financed thereby, and fourteen of the term loans have balloon or bullet repayments due at
maturity. The term loans are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on 30 (December 31, 2009 30) of the Companys vessels, together with certain other security. In addition, at March 31, 2010,
all but $131.8 million (December 31, 2009 $134.3 million) of the outstanding term loans were
guaranteed by Teekay or its subsidiaries.
The Company has two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding, which, as at March 31, 2010, totaled
285.8 million Euros ($386.1 million). The Company repays the loans with funds generated by two
Euro-denominated long-term time-charter contracts. Interest payments on the loans are based on
EURIBOR plus a margin. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the margins ranged between 0.6% and
0.66% and the one-month EURIBOR at March 31, 2010, was 0.40% (December 31, 2009 0.45%). The
Euro-denominated term loans reduce in monthly payments with varying maturities through 2023 and are
collateralized by first-priority mortgages on two of the Companys vessels, together with certain
other security, and are guaranteed by a subsidiary of Teekay.
Both Euro-denominated term loans are revalued at the end of each period using the then prevailing
Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due substantially to this revaluation, the Company recognized an
unrealized foreign exchange gain of $29.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010
(2009 $11.3 million gain).
The Company has one U.S. Dollar-denominated loan outstanding owing to a joint venture partner,
which, as at March 31, 2010, totaled $13.3 million, including accrued interest. Interest payments
on the loan, which is based on a fixed interest rate of 4.84%, commenced in February 2008. This
loan is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27, 2027.
Page 12 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The weighted-average effective interest rate on the Companys long-term aggregate debt as at March
31, 2010, was 2.3% (December 31, 2009 2.0%). This rate does not reflect the effect of the
Companys interest rate swaps (see Note 16).
Among other matters, the Companys long-term debt agreements generally provide for maintenance of
certain vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants. Certain
loan agreements require that a minimum level of free cash be maintained. As at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the loan agreements also require that
the Company maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn revolving credit lines with
at least six months to maturity, of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at March 31, 2010, this amount
was $230.9 million (December 31, 2009 $230.3 million).
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments required to be made by the Company
subsequent to March 31, 2010, are $205.5 million (remainder of 2010), $340.2 million (2011), $489.9
million (2012), $457.2 million (2013), $876.9 million (2014) and $2.2 billion (thereafter).
As at March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the credit
facilities and long-term debt.
9. Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
RasGas II LNG Carriers |
|
|
470,284 |
|
|
|
470,138 |
|
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier |
|
|
113,961 |
|
|
|
119,068 |
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
192,699 |
|
|
|
195,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
776,944 |
|
|
|
784,270 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
40,942 |
|
|
|
41,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
736,002 |
|
|
|
743,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RasGas II LNG Carriers. As at March 31, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to 30-year
capital lease arrangements for the three LNG carriers (or the RasGas II LNG Carriers) that operate
under time-charter contracts with Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II) (or RasGas II),
a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil
Corporation. All amounts below relating to the RasGas II LNG Carrier capital leases include the
non-controlling interests 30% share.
Under the terms of the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease arrangements, the lessor claims tax
depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to acquire these vessels. As is typical in
these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by the lessee. Lease payments
under the lease arrangements are based on tax and financial assumptions at the commencement of the
leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the lessor is entitled to increase the lease
payments to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. At inception of the leases the Companys best
estimate of the fair value of the guarantee liability was $18.6 million. The Companys carrying
amount of the remaining tax indemnification guarantee is $9.2 million and is included as part of
other long-term liabilities in the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
During 2008, the Company agreed under the terms of its tax lease indemnification guarantee to
increase its capital lease payments for the three RasGas II LNG Carriers to compensate the lessor
for losses suffered as a result of changes in tax rates. The estimated increase in lease payments
is approximately $8.1 million over the term of the leases, with a carrying value of $7.8 million as
at March 31, 2010. This amount is included as part of other long-term liabilities in the Companys
consolidated balance sheets.
The tax indemnification is for the duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the
years it would take for the lease payments to be statute barred, and ends in 2042. Although there
is no maximum potential amount of future payments, the Company may terminate the lease arrangements
at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, the Company will be required to pay termination
sums to the lessor sufficient to repay the lessors investment in the vessels and to compensate it
for the tax-effect of the terminations, including recapture of any tax depreciation.
At their inception, the weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 5.2%. These
capital leases are variable-rate capital leases. As at March 31, 2010, the commitments under these
capital leases approximated $1.0 billion, including imputed interest of $0.6 billion, repayable as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
24,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
929,000 |
|
Page 13 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier. As at March 31, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to a capital
lease on one Spanish-flagged LNG carrier, which is structured as a Spanish tax lease. Under the
terms of the Spanish tax lease, the Company will purchase the vessel at the end of the lease term
in December 2011. The purchase obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits
described below. At its inception, the implicit interest rate was 5.8%. As at March 31, 2010, the
commitments under this capital lease, including the purchase obligation, approximated 91.7 million
Euros ($124.0 million), including imputed interest of 7.4 million Euros ($10.0 million), repayable
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
26,900 Euros ($36,400 |
) |
2011 |
|
64,800 Euros ($87,600 |
) |
Suezmax Tankers. As at March 31, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on
five Suezmax tankers. Under the terms of the lease arrangements, the Company is required to
purchase these vessels after the end of their respective lease terms for fixed prices as well as
assuming the existing vessel financing subject to the lenders consent. At their inception, the
weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 7.4%. These capital leases are
variable-rate capital leases; however, any change in the lease payments resulting from changes in
interest rates is offset by a corresponding change in the charter hire payments received by the
Company. As at March 31, 2010, the remaining commitments under these capital leases, including the
purchase obligations, approximated $215.6 million, including imputed interest of $22.9 million,
repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
17,700 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
197,900 |
|
The Companys capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive covenants other than those
relating to operation and maintenance of the vessels.
FPSO Units. As at March 31, 2010, the Company was a party, as lessee, to capital leases on one FPSO
unit, the Petrojarl Foinaven, and the topside production equipment for another FPSO unit, the
Petrojarl Banff. However, prior to being acquired by Teekay, Teekay Petrojarl legally defeased its
future charter obligations for these assets by making up-front, lump-sum payments to unrelated
banks, which have assumed Teekay Petrojarls liability for making the remaining periodic payments
due under the long-term charters (or Defeased Rental Payments) and termination payments under the
leases.
The Defeased Rental Payments for the Petrojarl Foinaven were based on assumed Sterling LIBOR of 8%
per annum. If actual interest rates are greater than 8% per annum, the Company receives rental
rebates; if actual interest rates are less than 8% per annum, the Company is required to pay
rentals in excess of the Defeased Rental Payments. For accounting purposes, this contract feature
is an embedded derivative, and has been separated from the host contract and is separately
accounted for as a derivative instrument.
As is typical for these types of leasing arrangements, the Company has indemnified the lessors of
the Petrojarl Foinaven for the tax consequence resulting from changes in tax laws or interpretation
of such laws or adverse rulings by authorities and for fluctuations in actual interest rates from
those assumed in the leases.
Restricted Cash
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers and the Spanish-Flagged LNG
Carrier described above, the Company is required to have on deposit with financial institutions an
amount of cash that, together with interest earned on the deposits, will equal the remaining
amounts owing under the leases, including the obligations to purchase the Spanish-Flagged LNG
Carrier at the end of the lease period, where applicable. These cash deposits are restricted to
being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded primarily with term loans (see
Note 8).
As at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the three
RasGas II LNG Carriers was $478.6 million and $479.4 million, respectively. As at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, the weighted-average interest rates earned on the deposits were 0.3% and
0.4%, respectively.
As at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the
Spanish-Flagged LNG carrier was 85.4 million Euros ($115.4 million) and 84.3 million Euros ($120.8
million), respectively. As at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the weighted-average interest
rate earned on these deposits was 5.0%.
The Company also maintains restricted cash deposits relating to certain term loans and other
obligations, which totaled $14.3 million and $15.1 million as at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
10. Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of Teekay at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was 25,000,000
shares of Preferred Stock, with a par value of $1 per share, and 725,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the
Company issued 0.2 million common shares upon the exercise of stock options, and had no share
repurchases. As at March 31, 2010, Teekay had 73,443,038 shares of Common Stock (December 31, 2009 73,193,545) and no shares of Preferred Stock issued. As at March 31, 2010, Teekay had 72,943,838
shares of Common Stock outstanding (December 31, 2009 72,694,345).
Page 14 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
During 2008, Teekay announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to
$200 million of shares of its Common Stock in the open market, subject to cancellation upon
approval by the Board of Directors. As at March 31, 2010, Teekay had not repurchased any shares of
Common Stock pursuant to such authorizations. The total remaining share repurchase authorization at
March 31, 2010, was $200 million.
The Company grants restricted stock units to certain eligible officers, employees and directors of
the Company. Each restricted stock unit is equal in value to one share of the Companys common
stock plus reinvested dividends from the grant date to the vesting date. The restricted stock units
vest equally over two or three years from the grant date. Upon vesting, the value of the restricted
stock unit is paid to each grantee in the form of shares.
During March 2010, the Company granted 733,167 stock options at a weighted average exercise price
of $24.42 per share, 263,620 restricted stock units with a total fair value of $6.4 million, 87,054
performance shares with a total fair value of $2.1 million and 27,028 shares of restricted stock
awards with a total fair value of $0.7 million, based on the quoted market price, to certain of the
Companys employees and directors.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during March 2010 was $8.16 per
option. The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in
computing the fair value of the options granted: expected volatility of 52.7%; expected life of
four years; dividend yield of 3.3%; risk-free interest rate of 2.6%; and estimated forfeiture rate
of 9.8%. The expected life of the options granted was estimated using the historical exercise
behavior of employees. The expected volatility was generally based on historical volatility as
calculated using historical data during the five years prior to the grant date.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 0.2 million common shares for $2.0
million on exercise of stock options and recorded stock option compensation expense of $4.0
million, which increased additional paid-in capital by a total of $6.0 million. In addition, the
Company modified its settlement terms for restricted stock units during the three months ended
March 31, 2010, which decreased accrued liabilities by $4.0 million, decreased other long-term
liabilities by $2.0 million, and increased additional paid-in capital by a total of $6.0 million.
For the same period in 2009, the Company issued nominal number of common shares for $0.1 million on
exercise of stock options and recorded stock option compensation expense of $3.5 million, which
increased additional paid-in capital by a total amount of $3.6 million.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
a) Vessels Under Construction
As at March 31, 2010, the Company was committed to the construction of three LPG carriers and four
shuttle tankers scheduled for delivery between June 2010 and July 2011, at a total cost of
approximately $586.8 million, excluding capitalized interest. As at March 31, 2010, payments made
towards these commitments totaled $158.1 million (excluding $18.8 million of capitalized interest
and other miscellaneous construction costs), and long-term financing arrangements existed for
$428.7 million of the unpaid cost of these vessels. As at March 31, 2010, the remaining payments
required to be made under these newbuilding contracts were $247.5 million (remainder of 2010), and
$181.2 million (2011).
b) Joint Ventures
The Company has a 33% interest in a joint venture that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic
meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A. and ENI SpA. Final award of the charter was made in December 2007. The vessels will be
chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. The remaining members of
the joint venture are Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., which hold 34% and 33%
interests in the joint venture, respectively. In connection with this award, the joint venture has
entered into agreements with Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. to construct the four LNG carriers
at a total cost of approximately $906.0 million (of which the Companys 33% portion is $299.0
million), excluding capitalized interest. As at March 31, 2010, payments made towards these
commitments by the joint venture company totaled $181.2 million (of which the Companys 33%
contribution was $59.8 million and is included in investment in joint ventures in the consolidated
balance sheets), excluding capitalized interest and other miscellaneous construction costs. As at
March 31, 2010, the remaining payments required to be made under these contracts were $113.2
million (remainder of 2010), $475.6 million (2011) and $135.9 million (2012), of which the
Companys share is 33% of these amounts. In accordance with existing agreements, the Company is
required to offer to its subsidiary Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or Teekay LNG) its 33% interest in
these vessels and related charter contracts, no later than 180 days before the scheduled delivery
dates of the vessels. Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August 2011 and January 2012.
The Company has also provided certain guarantees in relation to the performance of the joint
venture company.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded equity (loss) income of $(2.7)
million (2009 $11.4 million income). This amount is included in equity (loss) income from joint
ventures in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The income or loss was primarily
comprised of the Companys share of the Angola LNG Project net income (loss) and the operations of
the Companys 40% interest in four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers. For the three months ended March 31,
2010, $6.1 million of the equity loss relates to the Companys share of unrealized loss on interest
rate swaps (2009 gain of $8.5 million).
Page 15 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
c) Legal Proceedings and Claims
The Company may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings and claims that arise in the
ordinary course of business. The Company believes that any adverse outcome of existing claims,
individually or in the aggregate, would not have a material effect on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows, when taking into account its insurance coverage and
indemnifications from charterers.
d) Redeemable Non-Controlling Interest
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, an unrelated party contributed a shuttle tanker with
a value of $35.0 million to a subsidiary of Teekay Offshore for a 33% equity interest of the
subsidiary. The equity issuance resulted in a dilution loss of $7.4 million. The non-controlling
interest owner of Teekay Offshores 67% owned subsidiary holds a put option which, if exercised,
would obligate Teekay Offshore to purchase the non-controlling interest owners 33% share in the
entity for cash in accordance with a defined formula. The redeemable non-controlling interest is
subject to remeasurement if the formulaic redemption amount exceeds the carrying value.
e) Other
The Company enters into indemnification agreements with certain officers and directors. In
addition, the Company enters into other indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
business. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited. However, the Company maintains what it believes is appropriate liability
insurance that reduces its exposure and enables the Company to recover future amounts paid up to
the maximum amount of the insurance coverage, less any deductible amounts pursuant to the terms of
the respective policies, the amounts of which are not considered material.
12. Fair Value Measurements
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments and other non-financial assets.
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities The fair value of the
Companys cash and cash equivalents approximates their carrying amounts reported in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Vessels held for sale The fair value of the Companys vessels held for sale is based on selling
prices of similar vessels and approximates their carrying amounts reported in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
Loans to and loans from joint ventures and joint venture partners The fair value of the Companys
loans to and loans from joint ventures and joint venture partners approximates their carrying
amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Long-term debt The fair value of the Companys fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt is
either based on quoted market prices or estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on
current rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the
current credit worthiness of the Company.
Derivative instruments The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments is the estimated
amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date,
taking into account, as applicable, fixed interest rates on interest rate swaps, current interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, and the current credit worthiness of both the Company and the
derivative counterparties. For the Foinaven embedded derivative, the calculation of the fair value
takes into account the fixed rate in the contract, current interest rates and foreign exchange
rates. Given the current volatility in the credit markets, it is reasonably possible that the
amounts recorded as derivative assets and liabilities could vary by material amounts in the near
term.
The Company categorizes its fair value estimates using a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs
used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of
the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
Page 16 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
The estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments and other non-financial assets and
categorization using the fair value hierarchy for those financial instruments that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
|
Level(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, and marketable securities |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
1,260,745 |
|
|
|
1,260,745 |
|
|
|
1,056,725 |
|
|
|
1,056,725 |
|
Vessels held for sale |
|
|
|
|
16,725 |
|
|
|
17,300 |
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
Loans to joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
20,384 |
|
|
|
20,384 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
|
|
21,998 |
|
Loans from joint venture partners |
|
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
(4,530,723 |
) |
|
|
(4,208,555 |
) |
|
|
(4,419,171 |
) |
|
|
(4,055,367 |
) |
Derivative instruments (note 16) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements (3) |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(432,682 |
) |
|
|
(432,682 |
) |
|
|
(378,407 |
) |
|
|
(378,407 |
) |
Interest rate swap agreements (3) |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
40,145 |
|
|
|
40,145 |
|
|
|
36,744 |
|
|
|
36,744 |
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
Forward freight agreements |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(9,680 |
) |
|
|
(9,680 |
) |
|
|
(8,769 |
) |
|
|
(8,769 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value hierarchy level is only applicable to each financial instrument on the
consolidated balance sheets that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company transacts all of its derivative instruments through investment-grade rated
financial institutions at the time of the transaction and requires no collateral from these
institutions. |
|
(3) |
|
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreements includes $33.6 million of
net accrued interest which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet. |
The Company has determined that other than vessels held for sale at December 31, 2009, there are no
other non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities carried at fair value at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. See Note 13 to these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
13. Vessel Sales
During February 2010, the Company sold a 1992-built Aframax tanker, which was presented on the
December 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheet as vessel held for sale. The vessel was part of the
Companys conventional tanker segment. The Company realized a loss of $0.2 million as a result of
this vessel sale.
In late March, 2010, the Company executed an agreement to sell a 1995-built Aframax tanker for
$17.3 million. On April 19, 2010, the terms and conditions of the agreement had been met and the
vessel was delivered to the buyer. The vessel is presented on the March 31, 2010 consolidated
balance sheet as vessel held for sale, and is recorded at carrying value. The vessel was part of
the Companys conventional tanker segment. The Company realized a gain of $0.3 million as a result
of this vessel sale which will be recorded in the second quarter of 2010.
14. Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Volatile organic compound emission plant lease income |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
As at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss
consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Unrealized gain on qualifying cash flow hedging instruments |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
2,923 |
|
Pension adjustments, net of tax recoveries |
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
(10,294 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities |
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
5,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,432 |
) |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 17 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
16. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivatives to manage certain risks in accordance with its overall risk management
policies.
Foreign Exchange Risk
The Company economically hedges portions of its forecasted expenditures denominated in foreign
currencies with foreign currency forward contracts. Certain foreign currency forward contracts are
designated, for accounting purposes, as cash flow hedges of forecasted foreign currency
expenditures.
As at March 31, 2010, the Company was committed to the following foreign currency forward
contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / Carrying Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Asset / (Liability) |
|
|
Expected Maturity |
|
|
|
In Foreign |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Forward |
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
Non-Hedge |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
Norwegian Kroner |
|
|
1,307.0 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
121.8 |
|
|
$ |
73.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
Euro |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Canadian Dollar |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pounds |
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
242.3 |
|
|
$ |
137.8 |
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average forward rate represents the contracted amount of foreign currency one U.S. Dollar
will buy. |
Interest Rate Risk
The Company enters into interest rate swaps which exchange a receipt of floating interest for a
payment of fixed interest to reduce the Companys exposure to interest rate variability on its
outstanding floating-rate debt. In addition, the Company holds interest rate swaps which exchange a
payment of floating rate interest for a receipt of fixed interest in order to reduce the Companys
exposure to the variability of interest income on its restricted cash deposits. The Company has not
designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
As at March 31, 2010, the Company was committed to the following interest rate swap agreements
related to its LIBOR-based debt, restricted cash deposits and EURIBOR-based debt, whereby certain
of the Companys floating-rate debt and restricted cash deposits were swapped with fixed-rate
obligations or fixed-rate deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Principal |
|
|
of Asset / |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability)(1) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(%)(2) |
|
LIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
450,271 |
|
|
|
(40,717 |
) |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
3,422,307 |
|
|
|
(351,498 |
) |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (4) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
(21,296 |
) |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
LIBOR-Based Restricted Cash Deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
473,104 |
|
|
|
40,145 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
EURIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps (5) (6) |
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
386,076 |
|
|
|
(19,171 |
) |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreements includes $33.6 million of
accrued interest which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes the margins the Company pays on its variable-rate debt, which at of March 31, 2010
ranged from 0.30% to 3.25%. |
|
(3) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly. |
|
(4) |
|
Inception dates of swaps in 2011 ($200.0 million). |
|
(5) |
|
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros ($94.7 million) by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(6) |
|
Principal amount is the U.S. Dollar equivalent of 285.8 million Euros. |
Spot Tanker Market Risk
In order to reduce variability in revenues from fluctuations in certain spot tanker market rates,
from time to time the Company has entered into forward freight agreements (or FFAs). FFAs involve
contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed-rates, thus attempting to reduce the
Companys exposure to spot tanker market rates. As at March 31, 2010, the FFAs had an aggregate
notional value of $35.2 million, which is an aggregate of both long and short positions. The FFAs
expire between April 2010 and December 2010. The Company has not designated these contracts as cash
flow hedges for accounting purposes.
Page 18 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Commodity Price Risk
The Company enters into bunker fuel swap contracts relating to a portion of its bunker fuel
expenditures. The Company has not designated its bunker fuel swap contracts as cash flow hedges for
accounting purposes. As at March 31, 2010, the Company was committed to contracts totalling 40,905
metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $455.65 per tonne. These bunker fuel swap contracts
expire between April 2010 and December 2010. As at December 31, 2009, the Company was committed to
contracts totalling 23,400 metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $439.23 per tonne.
Tabular Disclosure
The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments,
segregated by type of contract, on the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,141 |
) |
|
|
(801 |
) |
Derivative not designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
16,816 |
|
|
|
19,393 |
|
|
|
(33,567 |
) |
|
|
(135,698 |
) |
|
|
(259,443 |
) |
Forward freight agreements |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,573 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
|
|
(33,567 |
) |
|
|
(141,457 |
) |
|
|
(270,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
11,697 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Derivative not designated as a cash flow hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
16,336 |
|
|
|
17,695 |
|
|
|
(28,499 |
) |
|
|
(133,224 |
) |
|
|
(213,971 |
) |
Forward freight agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,996 |
|
|
|
18,119 |
|
|
|
(28,499 |
) |
|
|
(136,454 |
) |
|
|
(223,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the periods indicated, the following table presents the effective portion of gains (losses) on
foreign currency contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges that was recognized in (1)
other accumulated comprehensive income (or AOCI), (2) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) during the term of the hedging relationship and reclassified to earnings, and (3) the
ineffective portion of gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash
flow hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) |
|
|
(AOCI) |
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) |
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(2,082 |
) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(8,454 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,290 |
) |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
(2,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(12,744 |
) |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 19 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains from derivative instruments that are not designated for
accounting purposes as cash flow hedges, are recognized in earnings and reported in realized and
unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivatives in the consolidated statements of income
(loss). The effect of the (loss) gain on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in the
statements of income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
|
(3,540 |
) |
|
|
1,254 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(84,392 |
) |
|
|
41,665 |
|
Forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
Foinaven embedded derivative |
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
(87,847 |
) |
|
|
46,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2010, the Companys accumulated other comprehensive loss included $0.5 million of
unrealized gains on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges. As at March
31, 2010, the Company estimated, based on then current foreign exchange rates, that it would
reclassify approximately $1.3 million of net gains on foreign currency forward contracts from
accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings during the next 12 months.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the
foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swap agreements, FFAs and bunker fuel swap
contracts; however, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by any of the counterparties.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, the Company only enters into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 or better by Moodys at the
time of the transaction. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are
entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
17. (Loss) Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to stockholders of Teekay Corporation |
|
|
(14,002 |
) |
|
|
81,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
72,788,591 |
|
|
|
72,516,193 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
|
72,788,591 |
|
|
|
72,745,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Basic |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
1.12 |
|
- Diluted |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
1.12 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the anti-dilutive effect attributable to outstanding
stock-based compensation was 5.3 million shares. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the
anti-dilutive effect of 4.6 million shares attributable to outstanding stock options was excluded
from the calculations of diluted earnings per share.
18. Income Tax Recovery (Expense)
The legal jurisdictions in which Teekay and several of its subsidiaries are incorporated do not
impose income taxes upon shipping-related activities. However, among others, the Companys
Australian ship-owing subsidiaries and its Norwegian subsidiaries are subject to income taxes.
The components of the provision for income tax recovery (expense) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
8,950 |
|
|
|
(4,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
(5,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 20 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
19. Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In September 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to FASB ASC 605 Revenue Recognition that provides
for a new methodology for establishing the fair value for a deliverable in a multiple-element
arrangement. When vendor specific objective or third-party evidence for deliverables in a
multiple-element arrangement cannot be determined, the Company will be required to develop a best
estimate of the selling price of separate deliverables and to allocate the arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. This amendment will be effective for the
Company on January 1, 2011, although earlier adoption is allowed. The Company is currently
assessing the potential impact, if any, of adoption of this standard on its consolidated financial
statements.
20. Subsequent Events
In April 2010, Teekay Tankers completed a follow-on public offering of 7.7 million common shares of
its Class A Common Stock at a price of $12.25 per share, for gross proceeds of $94.3 million. The
underwriters exercised their overallotment option in part to purchase an additional 1,079,500 Class
A common shares, providing additional gross proceeds of $13.2 million. As a result, the Companys
ownership of Teekay Tankers has been reduced from 42.2% to 37.1%. Teekay maintains voting control
of Teekay Tankers through its ownership of shares of Teekay Tankers Class A and Class B common
stock and continues to consolidate the subsidiary.
Page 21 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2010
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Teekay Corporation (Teekay or the Company) is a leading provider of international crude oil and gas
marine transportation services and also offer offshore oil production, storage and offloading
services, primarily under long-term, fixed-rate contracts. Over the past decade, we have undergone
a major transformation from being primarily an owner of ships in the cyclical spot tanker business
to being a growth-oriented asset manager in the Marine Midstream sector. This transformation has
included the expansion into the liquefied natural gas (or LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG)
shipping sectors through our publicly-listed subsidiary Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (Teekay LNG),
further growth of our operations in the offshore production, storage and transportation sector
through our publicly-listed subsidiary Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (Teekay Offshore) and through
Teekay Petrojarl AS (Teekay Petrojarl), and expansion of our conventional tanker business through
our publicly-listed subsidiary Teekay Tankers Ltd. (Teekay Tankers). With a fleet of over 150
vessels, offices in 16 countries and approximately 6,300 seagoing and shore-based employees, Teekay
provides comprehensive marine services to the worlds leading oil and gas companies, helping them
link their upstream energy production to their downstream processing operations. Our goal is to
create the industrys leading asset management company focused on the Marine Midstream space.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN 2010
Public Offering of $450 Million Senior Unsecured Notes
In January 2010, we completed a public offering of $450 million senior unsecured notes due 2020,
which bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per year. We used a portion of the offering proceeds to
repurchase the majority of our outstanding 8.875% senior notes due 2011, and the remainder to
repay amounts outstanding under a term loan and a portion of outstanding debt under one of our
revolving credit facilities. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 8 Long-Term Debt.
Sale of Vessels to Teekay LNG
During March 2010, Teekay LNG acquired from us two 2009-built Suezmax tankers, the Bermuda Spirit
and the Hamilton Spirit, and one 2007-built Handymax product tanker, the Alexander Spirit, for a
total purchase price of $160 million. Teekay LNG financed the purchase by assuming $126 million of
existing debt related to two of the vessels and borrowing under one of its revolving credit
facilities for the remainder. In addition, Teekay LNG acquired approximately $15 million of working
capital in exchange for a short-term vendor loan from us. The Bermuda Spirit and the Hamilton
Spirit are currently operating under 12-year fixed-rate contracts to Centrofin, an international
owner of 28 vessels, and the Alexander Spirit is currently employed on a 10-year fixed-rate
contract to Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd.
Public Offering by Teekay Offshore Partners L.P.
During March 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of 4.4 million common units at a
price of $19.48 per unit, for gross proceeds of $87.5 million (including the general partners $1.7
million proportionate capital contribution). The underwriters concurrently exercised their
overallotment option to purchase an additional 660,000 units on March 22, 2010, providing
additional gross proceeds of $13.1 million (including the general partners $0.3 million
proportionate capital contribution). Teekay Offshore used the total net proceeds from the offering
to repay the vendor financing of $60.0 million we provided for the acquisition from us of the
floating production, storage and offloading (or FPSO) unit, the Petrojarl Varg and to finance a
portion of the April 2010 acquisition from us of the floating storage and offtake (or FSO) unit,
the Falcon Spirit, for $45.0 million. As a result of the above transactions, our ownership of
Teekay Offshore was reduced from 40.5% to 35.9% (including our 2% general partner interest). We
maintained control of Teekay Offshore by virtue of our control of the general partner and continue
to consolidate this subsidiary.
Public Offering by and Sale of Vessels to Teekay Tankers Ltd.
During April 2010, Teekay Tankers completed a public offering of 7.7 million common shares of its
Class A Common Stock at a price of $12.25 per share, for gross proceeds of $94.3 million. The
underwriters partially exercised their overallotment option and purchased an additional 1,079,500
common shares, for an additional gross proceeds of $13.2 million. In connection with an existing
agreement, Teekay agreed to offer to Teekay Tankers by June 18, 2010 the opportunity to purchase an
additional Suezmax-class oil tanker at fair market value. Teekay Tankers used the total net
proceeds from the offering to acquire from us for a total purchase price of $168.7 million the
following three vessels: the Suezmax tanker, the Yamuna Spirit, the Suezmax tanker, the Kaveri
Spirit, and the Aframax tanker, the Helga Spirit. As part of the purchase price for these vessels,
Teekay Tankers issued to us 2.6 million of unregistered common shares equal to the public offering
price of $12.25. As a result of these transactions, including the underwriters exercise of the
over-allotment option, we hold a 37.1% ownership interest in Teekay Tankers. We maintain voting
control of Teekay Tankers through our ownership of shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock and
continue to consolidate this subsidiary.
Foinaven FPSO Contract Amendment
In March 2010, we signed an agreement with the operator of the Foinaven FPSO unit and Foinaven
co-venturers to amend the operating contract for the FPSO unit, which also includes transportation
services provided by two shuttle tankers. The amended contract provides for operating services for
the Foinaven field until at least 2021 and includes operating performance incentives that may
increase the revenue generated by the Foinaven FPSO unit.
The amended contract, which applied from January 1, 2010, is comprised of the following components:
a daily rate, part of which is earned based on agreed operating performance incentives (adjusted
annually based on industry indices); a production tariff based on the volume of oil produced; and a
supplemental tariff based on both the volume of oil produced and the annual average Brent Crude Oil
price. Based on current values and prices, we expect that the Foinaven FPSO unit would generate
incremental operating cash flow and net income of approximately $30 million to $40 million per
annum over the anticipated life of the contract period.
Page 22 of 41
Under the amended contract, we will also receive payments of approximately $60 million relating to
the Foinaven FPSO units operations in previous years. The first installment of approximately $30
million was paid in April 2010 and the balance is expected to be payable in the third quarter of
2010. We recognized approximately $30 million in revenue in the first quarter of 2010 in
conjunction with the signing of the amended agreement, and we expect the second $30 million will be
recognized in revenue during the second or third quarter of 2010 upon the completion of certain
conditions.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
Angola LNG Project
We have a 33% interest in a consortium that will charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter LNG
carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by
subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total
S.A., and Eni SpA. Final award of the charter contract was made in December 2007. The vessels will
be chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and
NYK Bulkship (Europe) Ltd., have 34% and 33% interests in the consortium, respectively. In
accordance with existing agreements, we are required to offer to Teekay LNG our 33% interest in
these vessels and related charter contracts no later than 180 days before the scheduled delivery
dates of the vessels. Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August 2011 and January 2012.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint
Ventures.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts when analyzing our results of
operations. In addition, you should consider certain factors when evaluating our historical
financial performance and assessing our future prospects. These items can be found in Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (or GAAP), we
report gross revenues in our income statements and include voyage expenses among our operating
expenses. However, ship-owners base economic decisions regarding the deployment of their vessels
upon anticipated time-charter equivalent (or TCE) rates and industry analysts typically measure
bulk shipping freight rates in terms of TCE rates. This is because under time-charter contracts and
FPSO service contracts the customer usually pays the voyage expenses, while under voyage charters
and contracts of affreightment the ship-owner usually pays the voyage expenses, which typically are
added to the hire rate at an approximate cost. Accordingly, the discussion of revenue below focuses
on net revenues and TCE rates of our four reportable segments where applicable.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of four
segments: the shuttle tanker and FSO segment, the FPSO segment, the liquefied gas segment, and the
conventional tanker segment. In order to provide investors with additional information about our
conventional tanker segment, we have divided this operating segment into the fixed-rate tanker
segment and the spot tanker segment. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 2 Segment
Reporting.
Shuttle Tanker and FSO Segment
Our shuttle tanker and FSO segment (which includes our Teekay Navion Shuttle Tankers and Offshore
business unit) includes our shuttle tankers and FSO units. The shuttle tanker and FSO segment had
four shuttle tankers under construction as at March 31, 2010. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and Contingencies Vessels Under Construction. We use these
vessels to provide transportation and storage services to oil companies operating offshore oil
field installations. All of these shuttle tankers provide transportation services to energy
companies, primarily in the North Sea and Brazil. Our shuttle tankers service the conventional spot
market from time to time.
The following table presents our shuttle tanker and FSO segments operating results and compares
its net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable
GAAP financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in
calendar-ship-days by owned and chartered-in vessels for our shuttle tanker and FSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
162,069 |
|
|
|
155,688 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
29,303 |
|
|
|
18,408 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
132,766 |
|
|
|
137,280 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
43,321 |
|
|
|
45,784 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
32,178 |
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,559 |
|
|
|
29,252 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
13,129 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
(88.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
21,378 |
|
|
|
14,175 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
(27.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the shuttle tanker and FSO segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
Page 23 of 41
The average fleet size of our shuttle tanker and FSO segment (including vessels chartered-in)
decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year,
primarily due to a decline in the number of chartered-in shuttle tankers.
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.8 million due to fewer revenue days from shuttle tankers servicing
contracts of affreightment and fewer project days, and lower spot rates earned in the
conventional spot market, compared to the same period last year; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.3 million due to the completion of a time-charter agreement in June
2009; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.3 million due to declining oil production at mature oil fields in the
North Sea that are serviced by certain shuttle tankers on contracts of affreightment; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $2.6 million due to increased rates on certain contracts of affreightment
and bareboat and time-charter contracts; |
|
|
|
an increase of $2.0 million in FSO revenue due to favorable exchange rates; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.9 million on the Navion Saga due to a one-time reimbursement from
customers for certain crewing costs; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, due to a decline
in non-reimbursable bunker costs as compared to the same period last year. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.5 million relating to the net realized and unrealized changes in fair
value of our foreign currency forward contracts that are or have been designated as hedges
for accounting purposes; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.3 million due to a decrease in costs related to services, spares and
consumables during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period last
year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million due to weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Australian
Dollar; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million in crew training costs; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.9 million due to the acquisition of a shuttle tanker in February 2010. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.3 million from the redelivery of in-chartered vessels to their owners;
and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.4 million due to the acquisition of one previously in-chartered vessel
in February 2010; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $1.7 million due to increased spot in-charter activity for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period last year. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to
increased drydockings incurred in the latter half of 2009 and the acquisition of one previously
in-chartered vessel in February 2010.
Restructuring Charges. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we incurred
restructuring charges of $0.3 million, primarily relating to costs incurred for the reflagging of
certain vessels.
FPSO Segment
Our FPSO segment (which includes our Teekay Petrojarl business unit) includes our FPSO units and
other vessels used to service our FPSO contracts. We use these units and vessels to provide
transportation, production, processing and storage services to oil companies operating offshore oil
field installations. These services are typically provided under long-term fixed-rate time-charter
contracts, contracts of affreightment or FPSO service contracts. Historically, the utilization of
FPSO units and other vessels in the North Sea is higher in the winter months, as favorable weather
conditions in the summer months provide opportunities for repairs and maintenance to our offshore
oil platforms, which generally reduces oil production.
Page 24 of 41
The following table presents our FPSO segments operating results and also provides a summary of
the changes in calendar-ship-days for our FPSO segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
125,877 |
|
|
|
86,103 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
47,965 |
|
|
|
44,429 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,748 |
|
|
|
25,779 |
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
8,826 |
|
|
|
9,786 |
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
45,338 |
|
|
|
6,109 |
|
|
|
642.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the FPSO segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). For
further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and Administrative Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our FPSO segment (including vessels chartered-in) decreased for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year. This was the result of one
shuttle tanker that was converted to a FSO unit and transferred to the shuttle tanker and FSO
segment in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Revenues. Revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the
same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $30.0 million for the first installment from the amended operating
contract for our Foinaven FPSO unit related to operations in previous years, as discussed
above; |
|
|
|
an increase of $6.5 million from increased daily rates, tariff and incentive payments; |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.8 million from the Petrojarl Varg FPSO unit commencing a new four-year
fixed-rate contract extension beginning in the third quarter of 2009; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.0 million from a supplemental efficiency payment from the amendment of
the Foinaven FPSO contract; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.4 million, from the decrease in amortization of contract value
liabilities relating to FPSO service contracts (as discussed below), which was initially
recognized on the date of the acquisition by us of a controlling interest in Teekay
Petrojarl. |
As part of our acquisition of Teekay Petrojarl, we assumed certain FPSO service contracts that had
terms that were less favorable than prevailing market terms at the time of acquisition. This
contract value liability, which was recognized on the date of acquisition, is being amortized to
revenue over the remaining firm period of the current FPSO contracts on a weighted basis based on
the projected revenue to be earned under the contracts. The amount of amortization relating to
these contracts included in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $13.1 million
(2009 $17.5 million). Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 6 Intangible Assets and
In-Process Revenue Contracts.
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to increases in crew
manning costs related to change in crew classifications and wage increases, and partially offset by
a decrease in services and repairs due to the timing of certain projects.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to a
reassessment of the residual value of the units in 2010.
Liquefied Gas Segment
Our liquefied gas segment (which includes our Teekay Gas Services business unit) consists of LNG
and LPG carriers subject to long-term, fixed-rate time-charter contracts. At March 31, 2010, we had
one LPG carrier under construction and scheduled for delivery in June 2010. In addition, we have
four LNG carriers under construction that are scheduled for delivery between August 2011 and
January 2012, and two multi-gas carriers under construction, both of which are scheduled for
delivery in 2011. Upon delivery, all of these vessels will commence operation under long-term,
fixed-rate time-charters. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and
Contingencies Vessels Under Construction and Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint
Ventures.
Page 25 of 41
The following table presents our liquefied gas segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned vessels for our liquefied gas segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
62,534 |
|
|
|
57,583 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(109.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
62,561 |
|
|
|
57,291 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
11,370 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,527 |
|
|
|
14,598 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
(94.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
30,774 |
|
|
|
23,566 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels and Vessels under Direct Financing Lease |
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the liquefied gas segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The increase in the average fleet size of our liquefied gas segment was primarily due to the
deliveries of one LNG carrier in March 2009 (the Tangguh LNG Delivery) and two new LPG carriers in
April 2009 and November 2009 respectively (collectively the LPG Deliveries).
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 one of our LNG carriers, the Arctic Spirit, was
off-hire for 90 days, of which approximately 22 days were for a scheduled drydock.
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $8.8 million due to the commencement of the time-charters from the
Tangguh LNG Delivery and the LPG Deliveries; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.0 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated revenues from the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar compared to the same period last year;
and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.2 million due to the Dania Spirit being off-hire for 15 days during
2009 for repairs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.0 million due to the Arctic Spirit being off-hire for 90 days during
the first quarter of 2010. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.8 million relating to lower crew manning, insurance, and repairs and
maintenance costs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating
expenses from the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar compared to the same
period last year (a portion of our vessel operating expenses are denominated in Euros,
which is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew); and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.1 million from the Tangguh LNG Delivery net of initial delivery costs |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period
last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million from the LPG Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.4 million relating to amortization of drydock expenditures incurred
during the third and fourth quarters of 2009; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million from the commencement of the time-charter contracts for the
Tangguh Hiri and Tangguh Sago in January 2009 and May 2009, respectively, which are
accounted for as direct financing leases. |
Page 26 of 41
Conventional Tankers Segment
Certain of our comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current period. The reclassification relates to certain operating results on our short-term
time-charters and fixed-rate contracts of affreightment between one to three years, which
previously were included in our spot tanker sub-segment, but are now being reported in our
fixed-rate tanker sub-segment.
a) Fixed-Rate Tanker Sub-Segment
Our fixed-rate tanker segment, a subset of our conventional tanker segment (which includes our
Teekay Tankers Services business unit), includes conventional crude oil and product tankers on
long-term, fixed-rate time charters.
The following table presents our fixed-rate tanker sub-segments operating results and compares its
net revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our fixed-rate tanker sub-segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
94,032 |
|
|
|
93,680 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
93,336 |
|
|
|
92,376 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
25,997 |
|
|
|
22,092 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
15,139 |
|
|
|
20,110 |
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,816 |
|
|
|
15,653 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
8,979 |
|
|
|
7,516 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
22,534 |
|
|
|
26,854 |
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,577 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The average fleet size of our fixed-rate tanker sub-segment (including vessels chartered-in)
increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
the delivery of two new Suezmax tankers in June 2009 (the Suezmax Deliveries); |
|
|
|
the purchase of a product tanker which commenced a 10-year fixed-rate time-charter to
Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd. during September 2009; |
|
|
|
the transfer of three Suezmax tankers from the spot tanker sub-segment between September
2009 and November 2009 (the Suezmax Transfers); and |
|
|
|
the transfer of three Aframax tankers, on a net basis, from the spot tanker sub-segment
in 2009 upon commencement of long-term time-charters (the Aframax Transfers); |
partially offset by
|
|
|
the sale of one product tanker in October 2009 and two Aframax tankers in November 2009
and January 2010 (the Vessel Sales); |
|
|
|
the transfer of two product tankers to the spot tanker sub-segment in July 2009 and
January 2010 (the Product Tanker Transfers); and |
|
|
|
an overall decrease in the number of in-chartered vessels. |
The Aframax Transfers, discussed above, consist of the transfer of three owned vessels and two
in-chartered vessels from the spot tanker sub-segment, and the transfer of one owned vessel and one
in-chartered vessel to the spot tanker sub-segment. The effect of the transactions are to increase
the fixed tanker sub-segments net revenues, time-charter expenses, vessel operating expenses, and
depreciation and amortization expenses.
Page 27 of 41
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $8.4 million from the Aframax Transfers; |
|
|
|
an increase of $7.1 million from the Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of $4.2 million from the Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $3.1 million from the purchase of a new product tanker; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $9.3 million from the Vessel Sales; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $8.4 million from the redelivery of in-chartered vessels to their owners; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.0 million from the Product Tanker Transfers; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million due to interest-rate adjustments to the daily charter rates
under the time-charter contracts for five Suezmax tankers (however, under the terms of the
capital lease for these vessels, we had corresponding decreases in our lease payments,
which are reflected as decreases to interest expense; therefore, these and future interest
rate adjustments do not and will not affect our cash flow or net income). |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $4.2 million from the Aframax Transfers and Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 million from the purchase of the new product tanker; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million relating to higher crew manning, insurance, and repairs and
maintenance costs; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.4 million from the Suezmax Deliveries; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.9 million from the Vessel Sales. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, due to a decrease in the number of
in-chartered vessel days as vessels were redelivered to their owners.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the
Aframax Transfers, Suezmax Transfers, Suezmax Deliveries, purchase of the new product tanker, and
an increase in capitalized drydocking expenditures being amortized, partially offset by the Vessel
Sales and Product Tanker Transfers.
b) Spot Tanker Sub-Segment
Our spot tanker segment, a subset of our conventional tanker segment (which includes our Teekay
Tankers Services business unit), consists of conventional crude oil tankers and product carriers
operating on the spot tanker market or subject to time-charters or contracts of affreightment that
are priced on a spot-market basis or are short-term, fixed-rate contracts. We consider contracts
that have an original term of less than one year in duration to be short-term. Our conventional
Aframax, Suezmax, and large and medium product tankers are among the vessels included in the spot
tanker sub-segment.
Our spot tanker market operations contribute to the volatility of our revenues, cash flow from
operations and net income. Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing
volatility in profitability and asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand
for, vessel capacity. In addition, spot tanker markets historically have exhibited seasonal
variations in charter rates. Spot tanker markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a
result of increased oil consumption in the Northern Hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns
that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
Page 28 of 41
The following table presents our spot tanker sub-segments operating results and compares its net
revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days
by owned and chartered-in vessels for our spot tanker sub-segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
120,025 |
|
|
|
223,497 |
|
|
|
(46.3 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
42,578 |
|
|
|
70,665 |
|
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
77,447 |
|
|
|
152,832 |
|
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
25,882 |
|
|
|
28,668 |
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
Time-charter hire expense |
|
|
30,736 |
|
|
|
84,540 |
|
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,580 |
|
|
|
21,271 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
12,119 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of vessels and equipment, net of write-downs |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
(100.5 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
598.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from vessel operations |
|
|
(14,349 |
) |
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
(398.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar-Ship-Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned Vessels |
|
|
2,288 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
Chartered-in Vessels |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to the spot tanker sub-segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). For further discussion, please read Other Operating Results General and
Administrative Expenses. |
The average size of our spot tanker fleet (including vessels chartered-in) decreased for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
the sale of two product tankers in May 2009 (the Spot Product Tanker Sales); |
|
|
|
the transfer of three Suezmax tankers to the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment between
September and November 2009 (the Spot Suezmax Transfers); |
|
|
|
the net transfer of three Aframax tankers to the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment in 2009
(the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers); and |
|
|
|
an overall decrease in the number of in-chartered vessels; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
the delivery of five new Suezmax tankers between January 2009 to December 2009 (the Spot
Suezmax Deliveries); and |
|
|
|
the transfer of two product tankers from the fixed-rate tanker sub-segment in July 2009
and January 2010 (the Product Tanker Transfers). |
Tanker Market and TCE Rates
Average spot tanker rates in the first quarter of 2010 were the highest since the first quarter of
2009, primarily driven by strong non-OECD oil demand growth, higher global oil production and
limited tanker fleet growth.
China was a major source of tanker demand with crude oil imports averaging 4.6 million barrels per
day (or mb/d) in the first quarter of 2010, an increase of 39 percent from the same period in 2009.
Global oil supply rose by 0.7 mb/d in the first quarter led predominantly by non-OPEC producers and
OPEC Natural Gas Liquids.
The world tanker fleet grew by 5.6 mdwt, or approximately 1.3 percent, in the first quarter of 2010
compared to 12.0 mdwt, or 3.0 percent, in the same period of 2009. Net fleet growth was tempered by
the removal of 6.3 mdwt of tanker capacity as the International Maritime Organization (IMO)
targeted phase-out of single-hull tankers and higher scrap prices led to an increase in tanker
scrapping. The ongoing removal of single-hull tankers from the trading fleet is expected to
continue to dampen tanker fleet growth during the remainder of 2010, as illustrated by a further
2.6 mdwt being scrapped in April 2010.
In April 2010, the International Monetary Fund raised its global GDP growth forecast for 2010 from
3.9 percent to 4.2 percent due to the expected recovery in the global economy particularly in
emerging and developing countries. As a result, the International Energy Agency has increased its
2010 global oil demand forecast to 86.4 mb/d, which represents a 1.6 mb/d, or 1.9 percent, increase
over 2009 and the highest growth rate since 2004. The increase in global oil demand during 2010 is
expected to be entirely driven by non-OECD countries, led by China where demand is forecast to grow
by a further 8.0 percent.
Page 29 of 41
The following table outlines the TCE rates earned by the vessels in our spot tanker sub-segment for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and excludes the realized results of synthetic
time-charters (or STCs) and forward freight agreements (or FFAs), which we enter into at times as
hedges against a portion of our exposure to spot tanker market rates or for speculative purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCE |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Rate |
|
Vessel Type |
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
Days |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot Fleet (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suezmax Tankers |
|
|
29,477 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
30,420 |
|
|
|
40,277 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
39,799 |
|
Aframax Tankers |
|
|
42,192 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
19,231 |
|
|
|
92,855 |
|
|
|
3,621 |
|
|
|
25,643 |
|
Large/Medium Product Tankers |
|
|
7,122 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
14,388 |
|
|
|
19,911 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
22,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
77,447 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
21,172 |
|
|
|
152,832 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
|
27,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Spot fleet includes short-term time-charters and fixed-rate contracts of affreightment
less than 1 year. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the cost of spot in-charter vessels servicing fixed-rate contract of
affreightment cargoes, the amortization of in-process revenue contracts and cost of fuel
while offhire. |
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $36.8 million from decreases in our average spot tanker TCE rate during
the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $25.5 million from a decrease in the number of in-chartered vessels; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $10.1 million from the Spot Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.4 million from the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $5.4 million from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million from a change in the number of days our vessels were off-hire
due to regularly scheduled maintenance for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared
to the same period last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $8.3 million from the Spot Suezmax Deliveries; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.9 million from the Product Tanker Transfers. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.2 million from lower crew manning, repairs, maintenance and consumables
costs; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.8 million from the Spot Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.2 million from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.9 million from the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $2.0 million from the Spot Suezmax Deliveries; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.4 million from the Product Tanker Transfers. |
Time-Charter Hire Expense. Time-charter hire expense decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the decrease in the number
of in-chartered vessels compared to the same period last year.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.6 million from the Spot Suezmax Transfers; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.5 million from the Spot Aframax Tanker Transfers; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.8 million from the Spot Product Tanker Sales; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $2.3 million from the Spot Suezmax Tanker Deliveries. |
Page 30 of 41
Restructuring Charges. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we incurred
restructuring charges of $3.2 million primarily relating to costs incurred for certain vessel crew
changes.
Other Operating Results
The following table compares our other operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
(48,091 |
) |
|
|
(47,708 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(32,152 |
) |
|
|
(43,767 |
) |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
4,274 |
|
|
|
6,678 |
|
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated
derivative instruments |
|
|
(87,847 |
) |
|
|
46,822 |
|
|
|
(287.6 |
) |
Equity (loss) income from joint ventures |
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
11,422 |
|
|
|
(123.3 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
29,026 |
|
|
|
11,312 |
|
|
|
156.6 |
|
Loss on bond repurchase |
|
|
(12,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
(5,868 |
) |
|
|
(224.5 |
) |
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.5 million in compensation for shore-based employees and other
personnel expenses primarily due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian
dollar; |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.2 million associated with our equity-based compensation and long-term
incentive program for management; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.2 million from timing of travel costs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a net decrease of $1.7 million in unrealized and realized losses on foreign currency
forward contracts; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.9 million in corporate-related expenses. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to $32.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, from $43.8 million for the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $13.8 million primarily due to repayments of debt drawn under long-term
revolving credit facilities and term loans and decrease in interest rates relating to
long-term debt; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.1 million from the scheduled loan payments on the Catalunya Spirit, and
scheduled capital lease repayments on the Madrid Spirit (the Madrid Spirit is financed
pursuant to a Spanish tax lease arrangement, under which we borrowed under a term loan and
deposited the proceeds into a restricted cash account and entered into a capital lease for
the vessel; as a result, this decrease in interest expense from the capital lease is offset
by a corresponding decrease in the interest income from restricted cash); and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million from declining interest rates on our five Suezmax tanker
capital lease obligations; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a net increase of
$4.1 million due to the effect of the public offering of $450 million
8.5% senior unsecured notes due January 2020 and the repurchase
of the majority of the 8.875% senior notes due 2011 in January 2010; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.4 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated debt from the
strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to the same period last year. |
Interest Income. Interest income decreased to $4.3 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, from $6.7 million for the same period last year, primarily due to:
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.8 million due to decreases in LIBOR rates relating to the restricted
cash in Teekay Nakilat that is used to fund capital lease payments for the RasGas II LNG
Carriers; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.4 million primarily from scheduled capital lease repayments on one of
our LNG carriers which was funded from restricted cash deposits; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million primarily relating to lower bank account balances. |
Page 31 of 41
Realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivative instruments. Net
realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivatives was a loss of $87.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to net realized and unrealized gain on
non-designated derivatives of $46.8 million for the same period last year, as detailed in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. Dollars) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(38,586 |
) |
|
|
(21,311 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(5,497 |
) |
Bunkers and forward freight agreements (FFAs) |
|
|
(2,149 |
) |
|
|
(2,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,058 |
) |
|
|
(29,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(45,806 |
) |
|
|
62,976 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
(3,217 |
) |
|
|
6,751 |
|
Bunkers, FFAs and other |
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
6,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,789 |
) |
|
|
75,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized (losses) gains on non-designated derivative instruments |
|
|
(87,847 |
) |
|
|
46,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Gain. Foreign currency exchange gain was $29.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $11.3 million for the same period last year. The changes
in our foreign exchange gains was primarily attributable to the revaluation of our Euro-denominated
term loans at the end of each period for financial reporting purposes, and substantially all of the
gains or losses are unrealized. Gains reflect a stronger U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date
of revaluation. Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation.
Currently, our Euro-denominated revenues generally approximate our Euro-denominated operating
expenses and our Euro-denominated interest and principal repayments.
Equity (Loss) Income from Joint Ventures. Equity (loss) income from joint ventures was a
loss of $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to a gain of $11.4 million
for the same period last year. The income or loss was primarily comprised of our share of the
Angola LNG Project earnings (losses) and the operations of the four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, $6.1 million of the equity loss relates to our share of
unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, compared to unrealized gains on interest rate swaps of
$7.8 million included in equity income for the same period last year.
Income Tax Recovery (Expense). Income tax recovery (expense) was a recovery of $7.3 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to an expense of $5.9 million for the same
period last year. The increase to income tax recovery of $13.2 million, was primarily due to an
increase in deferred income tax recovery relating to unrealized foreign exchange translation
losses.
Other Income. Other income of $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, was
primarily comprised of leasing income from our volatile organic compound emissions equipment and
amortization of certain restructuring gains.
Net Income. As a result of the foregoing factors, net income amounted to $13.9 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to net income of $104.8 million for the same period
last year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity and Cash Needs
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows provided by our
operations and our undrawn credit facilities. Our short-term liquidity requirements are for the
payment of operating expenses, debt servicing costs, dividends, the scheduled repayments of
long-term debt, as well as funding our working capital requirements. As at March 31, 2010, our
total cash and cash equivalents amounted to $635.4 million, compared to $422.5 million as at
December 31, 2009. Our total liquidity, including cash and undrawn credit facilities, was $2.2
billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, as at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Our spot tanker market operations contribute to the volatility of our net operating cash flow. Historically, the tanker industry has been cyclical, experiencing volatility in profitability and
asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand for, vessel capacity. In addition,
spot tanker markets historically have exhibited seasonal variations in charter rates. Spot tanker
markets are typically stronger in the winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the
Northern Hemisphere and unpredictable weather patterns that tend to disrupt vessel scheduling.
As at March 31, 2010, we had $242.8 million of scheduled debt repayments and $40.9 million of
capital lease obligations coming due within the following twelve months. We believe that our
existing cash and cash equivalents and undrawn long-term borrowings, in addition to other sources
of cash such as cash from operations, will be sufficient to meet our existing liquidity needs for
at least the next twelve months.
In March 2010, we signed an agreement with the operator of the Foinaven FPSO unit and Foinaven
co-venturers to amend the operating contract for the FPSO unit. As a result of the amended
agreement, based on current crude oil values and prices, we expect that the Foinaven FPSO unit
would generate incremental operating cash flow of approximately $30 million to $40 million per
annum over the anticipated life of the contract period.
Page 32 of 41
Our operations are capital intensive. We finance the purchase of our vessels primarily through a
combination of borrowings from commercial banks or our joint venture partners, the issuance of
equity securities and cash generated from operations. In addition, we may use sale and lease-back
arrangements as a source of long-term liquidity. Occasionally, we use our revolving credit
facilities to temporarily finance capital expenditures until longer-term financing is obtained, at
which time we typically use all or a portion of the proceeds from the longer-term financings to
prepay outstanding amounts under the revolving credit facilities. As of March 31, 2010,
pre-arranged debt facilities were in place for all of our then remaining capital commitments
relating to our portion of new-buildings currently on order. Our pre-arranged new-building debt
facilities are in addition to our undrawn credit facilities. We continue to consider strategic
opportunities, including the acquisition of additional vessels and expansion into new markets. We
may choose to pursue such opportunities through internal growth, joint ventures or business
acquisitions. We intend to finance any future acquisitions through various sources of capital,
including internally-generated cash flow, existing credit facilities, additional debt borrowings,
or the issuance of additional debt or equity securities or any combination thereof.
As at March 31, 2010, our revolving credit facilities provided for borrowings of up to $3.5
billion, of which $1.5 billion was undrawn. The amount available under these revolving credit
facilities reduces by $186.7 million (remainder of 2010), $239.2 million (2011), $349.2 million
(2012), $756.1 million (2013), $770.4 million (2014) and $1.2 billion (thereafter). The revolving
credit facilities are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 63 of our vessels,
together with other related security, and are guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries.
Our outstanding term loans reduce in monthly, quarterly or semi-annual payments with varying
maturities through 2023. Some of the term loans also have bullet or balloon repayments at maturity
and are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on 32 of our vessels, together with
other related security, and are generally guaranteed by Teekay or our subsidiaries. Our unsecured
8.875% Senior Notes are due July 15, 2011. In January 2010, we completed a public offering of $450
million senior unsecured notes due 2020, which bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per year. We used
the offering proceeds to repurchase $151.1 million of our outstanding 8.875% Senior Notes due July
15, 2011, $150 million of the proceeds to repay amounts under a term loan and the remainder of the
offering proceeds to repay a portion of our outstanding debt under one of our revolving credit
facilities.
Among other matters, our long-term debt agreements generally provide for the maintenance of certain
vessel market value-to-loan ratios and minimum consolidated financial covenants and prepayment
privileges, in some cases with penalties. Certain of the loan agreements require that we maintain a
minimum level of free cash. As at March 31, 2010, this amount was $100.0 million. Certain of the
loan agreements also require that we maintain an aggregate level of free liquidity and undrawn
revolving credit lines (with at least six months to maturity) of at least 7.5% of total debt. As at
March 31, 2010, this amount was $230.9 million. We were in compliance with all loan covenants at
March 31, 2010.
We conduct our funding and treasury activities within corporate policies designed to minimize
borrowing costs and maximize investment returns while maintaining the safety of the funds and
appropriate levels of liquidity for our purposes. We hold cash and cash equivalents primarily in
U.S. Dollars, with some balances held in Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollars, Canadian Dollars,
Australian Dollars, British Pounds, Euros and Norwegian Kroner.
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
spot tanker market rates for vessels and bunker fuel prices. We use forward foreign currency
contracts, interest rate swaps, forward freight agreements and bunker fuel swap contracts to manage
currency, interest rate, spot tanker rates and bunker fuel price risks. With the exception of some
of our forward freight agreements, we do not use these financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. Please read Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) operating,
financing and investing activities for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($000s) |
|
|
($000s) |
|
Net operating cash flows |
|
|
94,781 |
|
|
|
136,832 |
|
Net financing cash flows |
|
|
151,621 |
|
|
|
(100,518 |
) |
Net investing cash flows |
|
|
(33,551 |
) |
|
|
(80,029 |
) |
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash flow from operating activities decreased to $94.8 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, from $136.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to a decrease
in net revenue, partially offset by a decrease in time-charter hire expense. Net cash flow from
operating activities depends on the tanker utilization and spot market hire rates, changes in
interest rates, fluctuations in working capital balances, timing and amount of drydocking
expenditures, repairs and maintenance activities, vessel additions and dispositions, and foreign
currency rates. The number of vessel drydockings tends to vary each year.
Financing Cash Flows
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, our net proceeds from long-term debt net of debt
issuance costs were $761.7 million. Our repayments and prepayments of long-term debt were $649.1
million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The net proceeds from long-term debt were
used to finance our expenditures for vessels and equipment, which are explained in more detail
below.
Page 33 of 41
During March 2010, Teekay Offshore completed a public offering of 4.4 million common units at a
price of $19.48 per unit, for gross proceeds of $87.5 million (including the general partners $1.7
million proportionate capital contribution). The underwriters concurrently exercised their
over-allotment option to purchase an additional 660,000 units, providing additional gross proceeds
of $13.1 million (including the general partners $0.3 million proportionate capital contribution).
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 5 Equity Offerings by Subsidiaries.
During April 2010, Teekay Tankers completed a public offering of 7.7 million common shares at a
price of $12.25 per share, for gross proceeds of $94.3 million. The underwriters partially
exercised their over-allotment option and purchased an additional 1,079,500 common shares, for
additional gross proceeds of $13.2 million. Teekay Tankers issued to us 2.6 million of unregistered
common shares valued on a per-share basis at the public offering price of $12.25. Please read Item
1 Financial Statements: Note 20 Subsequent Events.
There were no common stock repurchases during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Distributions from subsidiaries to non-controlling interests during the three months ended March
31, 2010, were $33.1 million.
Dividends paid during the three months ended March 31, 2010 were $23.0 million (2009 $22.9
million) or $0.31625 per share (2009 $0.31625). We have paid a quarterly dividend since 1995.
Subject to financial results and declaration by the Board of Directors, we currently intend to
continue to declare and pay a regular quarterly dividend in such amount per share on our common
stock.
Investing Cash Flows
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we:
|
|
|
incurred capital expenditures for vessels and equipment of $44.7 million primarily for
capitalized vessel modifications and shipyard construction installment payments on our
new-building shuttle tankers and LPG carriers; and |
|
|
|
received net proceeds of $10.0 million from the sale of one Aframax tanker. |
Commitments and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of U.S. Dollars |
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 and 2012 |
|
|
2013 and 2014 |
|
|
Beyond 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
4,144.8 |
|
|
|
196.2 |
|
|
|
608.8 |
|
|
|
1,318.9 |
|
|
|
2,020.9 |
|
Chartered-in vessels (operating leases) |
|
|
626.4 |
|
|
|
221.1 |
|
|
|
271.6 |
|
|
|
90.9 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) |
|
|
215.6 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
197.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases (3) |
|
|
1,043.3 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
929.3 |
|
Commitments under operating leases (4) |
|
|
476.5 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
357.4 |
|
Newbuilding installments (5) (6) |
|
|
667.8 |
|
|
|
284.8 |
|
|
|
383.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations |
|
|
7,195.6 |
|
|
|
756.6 |
|
|
|
1,559.4 |
|
|
|
1,508.0 |
|
|
|
3,371.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations: (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (8) |
|
|
386.1 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
221.4 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) (9) |
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations |
|
|
510.1 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
309.0 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,705.7 |
|
|
|
802.3 |
|
|
|
1,868.4 |
|
|
|
1,523.3 |
|
|
|
3,511.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $73.2 million (remainder of 2010), $180.6
million (2011 and 2012), $145.3 million (2013 and 2014) and $284.6 million (beyond 2014).
Expected interest payments are based on the existing interest rates (fixed-rate loans) and
LIBOR plus margins that ranged up to 3.25% at March 31, 2010 (variable-rate loans). The
expected interest payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we
have used as an economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes, in addition to lease payments, amounts we are required to pay to purchase
certain leased vessels at the end of the lease terms. We are obligated to purchase five of
our existing Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital leases, which will
occur in 2011. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized portion of the vessel
construction financing costs for the vessels, which we expect to range from $31.7 million
to $39.2 million per vessel. We expect to satisfy the purchase price by assuming the
existing vessel financing, although we may be required to obtain separate debt or equity
financing to complete the purchases if the lenders do not consent to our assuming the
financing obligations. We are also obligated to purchase one of our existing LNG carriers
upon the termination of the related capital leases on December 31, 2011. The purchase
obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash. |
|
(3) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $478.6 million, together with the interest earned
on the deposits, will be sufficient to repay the remaining amounts we currently owe under
the lease arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
We have corresponding leases whereby we are the lessor and expect to receive $440.8
million for these leases from 2010 to 2029. |
Page 34 of 41
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents remaining construction costs (excluding capitalized interest and
miscellaneous construction costs) for three LPG carriers and four shuttle tankers as of
March 31, 2010. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11(a) Commitments and
Contingencies Vessels Under Construction. |
|
(6) |
|
We also have a 33% interest in a consortium that has entered into agreements for the
construction of four LNG carriers. As at March 31, 2010, the remaining commitments on these
vessels, excluding capitalized interest and other miscellaneous construction costs, totaled
$724.8 million of which our share is $239.2 million. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 11(b) Commitments and Contingencies Joint Ventures. |
|
(7) |
|
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars and have been converted
using the prevailing exchange rate as at March 31, 2010. |
|
(8) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $2.9 million (remainder of 2010), $6.4 million
(2011 and 2012), $3.0 million (2013 and 2014) and $8.4 million (beyond 2014). Expected
interest payments are based on EURIBOR at March 31, 2010, plus margins that ranged up to
0.66%, as well as the prevailing U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of March 31, 2010. The
expected interest payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we
have used as an economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(9) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $115.4 million, together with the interest earned
on these deposits, will be expected to equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease
arrangement, including our obligation to purchase the vessel at the end of the lease term. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions that we consider to be the most
critical to an understanding of our financial statements because they inherently involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, are described in Item 5 Operating and Financial Review
and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Goodwill
As of March 31, 2010, we had four reporting units with goodwill attributable to them. During the
third quarter of 2009, we determined there were indicators of impairment present within our shuttle
tanker reporting unit. Consequently, an interim goodwill impairment test was conducted on this
reporting unit. This interim goodwill impairment test determined that the fair value of the
reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 75%. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying
value of goodwill for this reporting unit was $130.9 million. Key assumptions that impact the fair
value of this reporting unit include our ability to do the following: maintain or improve the
utilization of its vessels; redeploy existing vessels on the expiry of their current charters;
control or reduce operating expenses, pass on operating cost increases to its customers in the form
of higher charter rates; and continue to grow the business. Other key assumptions include the
operating life of our vessels, its cost of capital, the volume of production from certain offshore
oil fields, and the fair value of its credit facilities. If actual future results are less
favorable than expected results, in one or more of these key assumptions, a goodwill impairment may
occur.
As of the date of this filing, we do not believe that there is a reasonable possibility that the
goodwill attributable to our other three reporting units with goodwill attributable to them might
be impaired within the next year.
However, certain factors that impact our goodwill impairment tests are inherently difficult to
forecast and as such we cannot provide any assurances that an impairment will or will not occur in
the future. An assessment for impairment involves a number of assumptions and estimates that are
based on factors that are beyond our control. These are discussed in more detail in the following
section entitled Forward-Looking Statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the three months ended March 31, 2010, contains certain forward-looking
statements (as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) concerning future events and our operations, performance and financial condition,
including, in particular, statements regarding:
|
|
our future growth prospects; |
|
|
tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand in the tanker market
and spot tanker charter rates; |
|
|
the impact of the Foinaven amended contract on our future operating results; |
|
|
the sufficiency of working capital for short-term liquidity requirements; |
|
|
future capital expenditure commitments and the financing requirements for such commitments; |
|
|
delivery dates of and financing for new-buildings, and the commencement of service of
new-buildings under long-term time-charter contracts; |
|
|
potential new-building order cancellations; |
Page 35 of 41
|
|
construction and delivery delays in the tanker industry generally; |
|
|
the future valuation of goodwill; |
|
|
our compliance with covenants under our credit facilities; |
|
|
our hedging activities relating to foreign exchange and interest rate risks; |
|
|
the adequacy of restricted cash deposits to fund capital lease obligations; |
|
|
the effectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures and the ability of the
counter-parties to our derivative contracts to fulfill their contractual obligations; |
|
|
the condition of financial and economic markets, including the recent credit crisis,
interest rate volatility and the availability and cost of capital; and |
|
|
the growth of global oil demand. |
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words believe,
anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely result, or
words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are
based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: changes in
production of oil from offshore oil fields; changes in the demand for offshore oil transportation,
processing and storage services; changes in demand for LNG and LPG; greater or less than
anticipated levels of vessel new-building orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of
vessel scrapping; changes in trading patterns; changes in volumes of oil purchased under the
Foinaven contract and the related price of oil; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations
and the timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; potential inability to implement our
growth strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential for early
termination of long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace long-term
contracts; loss of any customer, time-charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel delivery
delays; our potential inability to raise financing to purchase additional vessels; our exposure to
foreign currency exchange, interest rate and tanker spot market rate fluctuations; conditions in
the public equity markets; and other factors detailed from time to time in our periodic reports
filed with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
We do not intend to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements
contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with respect thereto or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Page 36 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2010
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from foreign currency fluctuations and changes in interest rates,
bunker fuel prices and spot tanker market rates for vessels. We use foreign currency forward
contracts, interest rate swaps, bunker fuel swap contracts and forward freight agreements to manage
currency, interest rate, bunker fuel price and spot tanker market rate risks but do not use these
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, except as noted below under Spot Tanker
Market Rate Risk. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 16 Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities.
Foreign Currency Fluctuation Risk
Our primary economic environment is the international shipping market. This market utilizes the
U.S. Dollar as its functional currency. Consequently, a substantial majority of our revenues and
most of our operating costs are in U.S. Dollars. We incur certain voyage expenses, vessel operating
expenses, drydocking and overhead costs in foreign currencies, the most significant of which are
the Singapore Dollar, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, Australian Dollar, British Pound, Euro
and Norwegian Kroner.
We reduce our exposure by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. In most cases we hedge
a substantial majority of our net foreign currency exposure for the following 12 months. We
generally do not hedge our net foreign currency exposure beyond three years forward.
As at March 31, 2010, we had the following foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair value(1) |
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Norwegian Kroner: |
|
$ |
121.8 |
|
|
$ |
73.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
213.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Euro: |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Dollar: |
|
$ |
31.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
British Pounds: |
|
$ |
39.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
67.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
Average contractual exchange rate(2) |
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contract amounts and fair value amounts in millions of U.S. Dollars. |
|
(2) |
|
Average contractual exchange rate represents the contractual amount of foreign currency one
U.S. Dollar will buy. |
Although the majority of our transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in U.S. Dollars,
certain of our subsidiaries have foreign currency-denominated liabilities. There is a risk that
currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of our cash flows. We have not
entered into any forward contracts to protect against the translation risk of our foreign
currency-denominated liabilities. As at March 31, 2010, we had Euro-denominated term loans of 285.8
million Euros ($386.1 million) included in long-term debt and Norwegian Kroner-denominated deferred
income taxes of approximately 18.6 million ($3.1 million). We receive Euro-denominated revenue from
certain of our time-charters. These Euro cash receipts generally are sufficient to pay the
principal and interest payments on our Euro-denominated term loans. Consequently, we have not
entered into any foreign currency forward contracts with respect to our Euro-denominated term
loans, although there is no assurance that our exposure to fluctuations in the Euro will not
increase in the future.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that require
us to make interest payments based on LIBOR or EURIBOR. Significant increases in interest rates
could adversely affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to repay our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in interest
rates. Generally our approach is to hedge a substantial majority of floating-rate debt associated
with our vessels that are operating on long-term fixed-rate contracts. We manage the rest of our
debt based on our outlook for interest rates and other factors.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 by Moodys at the time of the
transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are entered
into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
Page 37 of 41
The table below provides information about our financial instruments at March 31, 2010, which are
sensitive to changes in interest rates, including our debt and capital lease obligations and
interest rate swaps. For long-term debt and capital lease obligations, the table presents principal
cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest
rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected
contractual maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
of 2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate ($U.S.) (2) |
|
|
160.2 |
|
|
|
253.5 |
|
|
|
233.7 |
|
|
|
401.9 |
|
|
|
821.0 |
|
|
|
1,311.8 |
|
|
|
3,182.1 |
|
|
|
(2,899.9 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Variable Rate (Euro) (3) (4) |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
208.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
386.1 |
|
|
|
(348.7 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
Fixed-Rate Debt ($U.S.) |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
709.2 |
|
|
|
962.8 |
|
|
|
(960.0 |
) |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Average Interest Rate |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (5) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate ($U.S.) (7) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
185.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192.7 |
|
|
|
(192.7 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate (8) |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount ($U.S.) (6)(9)(10) |
|
|
252.1 |
|
|
|
170.3 |
|
|
|
276.3 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
2,744.8 |
|
|
|
3,622.4 |
|
|
|
(373.4 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (Euro) (4) |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
208.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
386.1 |
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (3) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate, which as of March
31, 2010, ranged from 0.3% to 3.25%. The average interest rate for our capital lease
obligations is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in our lease obligations at the
inception of the leases. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on LIBOR.
The average fixed pay rate for our interest rate swaps excludes the margin we pay our
floating-rate debt. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange
rate as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations (present value of minimum lease payments) of 84.3 million
Euros ($114.0 million) on one of our existing LNG carriers with a weighted-average fixed
interest rate of 5.8%. Under the terms of this fixed-rate lease obligation, we are required to
have on deposit, subject to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.0%, an amount of cash
that, together with the interest earned thereon, will fully fund the amount owing under the
capital lease obligation, including a vessel purchase obligation. As at March 31, 2010, this
amount was 85.4 million Euros ($115.4 million). Consequently, we are not subject to interest
rate risk from these obligations or deposits. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers (see Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash), we are required to have
on deposit, subject to a variable rate of interest, an amount of cash that, together with
interest earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the variable-rate
leases. The deposits, which as at March 31, 2010, totaled $478.6 million, and the lease
obligations, which as at March 31, 2010, totaled $470.3 million, have been swapped for
fixed-rate deposits and fixed-rate obligations. Consequently, we are not subject to interest
rate risk from these obligations and deposits and, therefore, the lease obligations, cash
deposits and related interest rate swaps have been excluded from the table above. As at March
31, 2010, the contract amount, fair value and fixed interest rates of these interest rate
swaps related to the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease obligations and restricted cash
deposits were $450.3 million and $473.1 million, ($40.7) million and $40.1 million, and 4.9%
and 4.8% respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease
payments together with our purchase obligation, as applicable (see Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations and Restricted Cash). |
|
(8) |
|
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in the capital lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. |
|
(9) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our interest rate swaps is set monthly at the 1-month
LIBOR or EURIBOR, quarterly at the 3-month LIBOR or semi-annually at the 6-month LIBOR. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes interest rate swaps of $200.0 million that commence in 2011. |
Page 38 of 41
Commodity Price Risk
From time to time we use bunker fuel swap contracts as economic hedges to protect against changes
in forecasted bunker fuel costs for certain vessels being time-chartered-out and for vessels
servicing certain contracts of affreightment. As at March 31, 2010, we were committed to contracts
totaling 40,905 metric tonnes with a weighted-average price of $455.65 per tonne and a fair value
asset of $0.5 million. The fuel swap contracts expire between April 2010 and December 2010.
Spot Tanker Market Rate Risk
We use forward freight agreements (or FFAs) as economic hedges to protect against changes in spot
tanker market rates earned by some of our vessels in our spot tanker segment. FFAs involve
contracts to move a theoretical volume of freight at fixed-rates. As at March 31, 2010, the FFAs
had an aggregate notional value of $35.2 million, which is an aggregate of both long and short
positions, and a net fair value asset of $2.8 million. The FFAs expire between April 2010 and
December 2010.
We use FFAs in speculative transactions to increase or decrease our exposure to spot tanker market
rates within strictly defined limits. Historically, we have used a number of different tools,
including the sale/purchase of vessels and the in-charter/out-charter of vessels, to increase or
decrease this exposure. We believe that we can capture some of the value from the volatility of the
spot tanker market and from market imbalances by utilizing FFAs. As at March 31, 2010, we were not
committed to any speculative related FFAs.
Page 39 of 41
TEEKAY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2010
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the risk factors below and other information set forth in this Report on Form 6-K,
you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY.
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (FILE NO. 33-97746) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 4,
1995; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-42434) FILED WITH THE SEC ON JULY 28,
2000; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-119564) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 6,
2004; |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-147683) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 28, 2007; AND |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (FILE NO. 333-166523) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 5, 2010 |
Page 40 of 41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY CORPORATION
|
|
Date: June 14, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Vincent Lok
|
|
|
|
Vincent Lok |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
Page 41 of 41