e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 2, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the Transition Period
from to
Commission File Number 000-17781
Symantec Corporation
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
77-0181864
(I.R.S. employer
Identification no.) |
|
|
|
350 Ellis Street,
Mountain View, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
94043
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(650) 527-8000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Shares of Symantec common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of July 30, 2010:
789,341,729 shares.
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended July 2, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 * |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,726 |
|
|
$ |
3,029 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
Investment in joint venture |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,866 |
|
|
$ |
11,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
4,530 |
|
|
|
3,771 |
|
Long-term convertible senior notes |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Long-term income taxes payable |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
6,684 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
8,813 |
|
|
|
8,990 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,448 |
) |
|
|
(4,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
10,866 |
|
|
$ |
11,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Derived from audited financial statements. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
financial statements.
3
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 * |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content, subscription, and maintenance |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
License |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content, subscription, and maintenance |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
License |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Amortization of acquired product rights |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Amortization of other purchased intangible assets |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Restructuring and transformation |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Loss and impairment of assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and loss from joint venture |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
Loss from joint venture |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As adjusted for the impact of our joint ventures adoption of new authoritative guidance on
revenue recognition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as of the first quarter of fiscal
2010. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
financial statements.
4
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
July 3, 2009 * |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Amortization of discount on senior convertible notes |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Loss from joint venture |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Net change in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Cash (payments for) returned from acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Purchase of equity investments |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock benefit plans |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Tax payments related to restricted stock issuance |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
Repayment of other long-term liability |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
399 |
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,726 |
|
|
$ |
2,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As adjusted for the impact of our joint ventures adoption of new authoritative guidance on
revenue recognition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as of the first quarter of fiscal
2010. |
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
financial statements.
5
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Symantec Corporation (we, us, our,
and the Company refer to Symantec Corporation and all of its subsidiaries) as of July 2, 2010 and
April 2, 2010, and for the three months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, have been prepared in
accordance with the instructions on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In accordance with those rules and regulations, we have
omitted certain information and notes normally provided in our annual consolidated financial
statements. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain
all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, except as otherwise noted, necessary
for the fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for the interim
periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended July 3, 2009
have been adjusted for the impact of our joint ventures adoption of new authoritative guidance on
revenue recognition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as of the first quarter of fiscal
2010. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010. The results of operations for the three months ended July 2,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Fiscal Year End
We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year ending on the Friday closest to March 31. The
three months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 both consisted of 13 weeks. Our 2011 fiscal year
consists of 52 weeks and ends on April 1, 2011.
Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no changes in our significant accounting policies for the three months ended
July 2, 2010 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.
Recently Adopted Authoritative Guidance
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we adopted new authoritative guidance which changes the
model for determining whether an entity should consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE). The
standard replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which
enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying
which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a VIE and the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or the right to receive the entitys residual returns. The adoption of this
guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended
July 2, 2010.
Note 2. Fair Value Measurements
We measure assets and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price as defined by
the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, which represents the amount that would be
received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly
transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair
value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a
recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a
hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets
or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities
in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or
liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions incorporated in valuation
techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent
with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available. |
6
All of our financial instruments are measured and recorded at fair value. For certain
financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and other current
liabilities, the carrying value approximates the fair value due to the relative short maturity of
these instruments. For our other financial instruments and/or financial assets, specifically
short-term investments, the fair value is determined using different assumptions as outlined above.
Our equity investments ($28 million as of July 2, 2010) are carried at cost and measured at fair
value when indicators of potential impairment exist. Our convertible senior notes and credit
facility are carried at cost and fair value measurements are made on a nonrecurring basis.
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table summarizes our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 2, 2010 |
|
|
As of April 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
2,046 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,046 |
|
Bank securities and deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,046 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 available-for-sale securities are based on quoted market prices of the identical
underlying security. Level 2 available-for-sale securities are priced using quoted market prices
for similar instruments and nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable market
data.
Note 3. Acquisitions
PGP Acquisition
On June 4, 2010, we completed the acquisition of PGP Corporation (PGP), a nonpublic provider
of email and data encryption software. In exchange for all of the voting equity interests of PGP,
we paid a total purchase price of $306 million, excluding cash acquired. The results of operations
of PGP are included since the date of acquisition as part of the Security and Compliance segment.
Supplemental pro forma information for PGP was not material to our financial results and was
therefore not included. For the three months ended July 2, 2010, we recorded acquisition-related
transaction costs of $3 million, which were included in general and administrative expense.
The following table presents the purchase price allocation included in our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets (1) |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Intangible assets (2) |
|
|
74 |
|
Goodwill (3) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net tangible assets included
deferred revenue which was adjusted
down from $55 million to $9 million
representing our estimate of the
fair value of the contractual
obligation assumed for support
services. |
|
(2) |
|
Intangible assets included customer
relationships of $29 million,
developed technology of $39 million,
and definite-lived tradenames of $3
million, which have weighted-average
estimated useful lives of 8.0 years,
5.0 years and 2.0 years,
respectively. These intangible
assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives of two to
eight years. These intangible assets
also included in-process research
and development (IPR&D) of $3
million, which is classified as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset
until the project is completed or
abandoned. |
|
(3) |
|
Goodwill is not tax deductible. The
amount resulted primarily from our
expectation of synergies from the
integration of PGP product offerings
with our product offerings. |
7
GuardianEdge Acquisition
On June 3, 2010, we completed the acquisition of a GuardianEdge Technologies, Inc.
(GuardianEdge), a nonpublic provider of email and data encryption software. In exchange for all
the voting equity interests, we paid a total purchase price of $73 million, excluding cash
acquired. This includes $1 million in assumed equity awards at fair value. The results of
operations of GuardianEdge are included since the date of acquisition as part of the Security and
Compliance segment. Supplemental pro forma information for GuardianEdge was not material to our
financial results and was therefore not included. For the three months ended July 2, 2010, we
recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $1 million, which were included in general and
administrative expense.
The following table presents the purchase price allocation included in our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible assets (1) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Intangible assets (2) |
|
|
30 |
|
Goodwill (3) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net tangible assets included
deferred revenue which was adjusted
down from $17 million to $2 million
representing our estimate of the
fair value of the contractual
obligation assumed for support
services. |
|
(2) |
|
Intangible assets included customer
relationships of $19 million and
developed technology of $11 million,
which have weighted-average
estimated useful lives of 9.0 years
and 5.0 years, respectively. These
intangible assets are amortized over
their estimated useful lives of five
to nine years. |
|
(3) |
|
Goodwill is not tax deductible. The
amount resulted primarily from our
expectation of synergies from the
integration of GuardianEdge product
offerings with our product
offerings. |
Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill is allocated by reportable segment as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security and |
|
|
Storage and Server |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Compliance |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Balance as of April 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
|
$ |
2,648 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
4,605 |
|
Goodwill acquired through business combinations (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
Goodwill adjustments (2) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
1,847 |
|
|
$ |
2,648 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
4,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 3 for acquisitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects adjustments made to goodwill as a result of foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations. |
We apply a fair value based impairment test to the carrying value of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or
earlier if indicators of impairment exist. As of July 2, 2010, no indicators of impairment were
identified.
8
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
1,885 |
|
|
$ |
(1,030 |
) |
|
$ |
855 |
|
|
4 years |
Developed technology |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
183 |
|
|
2 years |
Definite-lived tradenames |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
5 years |
Patents |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
3 years |
Indefinite-lived tradenames |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Indefinite |
Indefinite-lived IPR&D |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,828 |
|
|
$ |
(2,656 |
) |
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
4 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
1,839 |
|
|
$ |
(973 |
) |
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
4 years |
Developed technology |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
(1,458 |
) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
1 year |
Definite-lived tradenames |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
5 years |
Patents |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
3 years |
Indefinite-lived tradenames |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,730 |
|
|
$ |
(2,551 |
) |
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, total amortization expense for
intangible assets was $106 million and $160 million, respectively.
Total future amortization expense for intangible assets that have definite lives, based on our
existing intangible assets and their current estimated useful lives as of July 2, 2010, is
estimated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of fiscal 2011 |
|
$ |
247 |
|
2012 |
|
|
311 |
|
2013 |
|
|
278 |
|
2014 |
|
|
134 |
|
2015 |
|
|
80 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
9
Note 5. Supplemental Financial Information
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Property and equipment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer hardware and software |
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,345 |
) |
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Land |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net: |
|
$ |
935 |
|
|
$ |
949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $59 million and $60 million for the three months ended July 2, 2010
and July 3, 2009, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments arising during the period, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Restructuring
Our restructuring costs and liabilities consist of severance, benefits, facilities and other
costs. Severance and benefits generally include severance, outplacement services, health insurance
coverage, effects of foreign currency exchange, and legal costs. Facilities costs generally include
rent expense, less expected sublease income, and lease termination costs. Also included in
Restructuring in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income are transition and transformation
fees, consulting services, and other costs related to the outsourcing of back office functions.
Restructuring expenses are included in the Other reporting segment.
Charges for restructuring costs were $40 million and $34 million for the three months ended
July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. These amounts include transition, transformation,
consulting and other related costs of $5 million and $11 million for the three months ended July 2,
2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. Transition and transformation related activities are expected
to be substantially completed in the second half of fiscal 2011. Total remaining costs for
transition and transformation activities are estimated to range from approximately $10 million to
$15 million.
10
Restructuring Plans
The following details restructuring plans that management has committed to and are not
substantially completed:
2011 Restructuring Plan (2011 Plan)
In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, management approved and initiated the following
restructuring events:
|
|
|
Expansion of Consulting partner sales and delivery capabilities. This action was
initiated to expand our partner eco-system to better leverage their customer reach and
operational scale, which will result in a headcount reduction within our consulting services
organization. It is intended for Symantec customers to have greater choice in their
providers for technology services. These actions are expected to be substantially completed
in the second half of fiscal 2011 and the total remaining costs for severance and benefits
are estimated to range from $40 million to $50 million. |
2010 Restructuring Plan (2010 Plan)
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, management approved and initiated the following
restructuring events:
|
|
|
Reduce operating costs through a workforce realignment. This action was initiated to
more appropriately allocate resources to the Companys key strategic initiatives. Charges
related to this action are for severance and benefits. These actions are expected to be
substantially completed in the second half of fiscal 2011. Total remaining costs for
severance and benefits are estimated to range from $40 million to $60 million. |
|
|
|
|
Reduce operating costs through a facilities consolidation. This action was initiated to
streamline our operations and deliver better and more efficient support to our customers and
employees. Charges related to this action are for consolidating certain facilities in North
America and Europe. These actions are expected to be substantially completed in the second
half of fiscal 2011. Total remaining costs for facilities are estimated to range from $25
million to $35 million. |
2008 Restructuring Plan (2008 Plan)
In the third quarter of fiscal 2008, management approved and initiated the following
restructuring events:
|
|
|
Reduce operating costs through a worldwide headcount reduction. This action was
initiated in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and was substantially completed in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008. Charges related to this action are for severance and benefits. Total
remaining headcount reduction costs are not expected to be significant. |
|
|
|
|
Reduce operating costs, implement management structure changes, optimize the business
structure, and discontinue certain products. Charges related to these actions are for
severance and benefits. These actions were initiated in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 and
are expected to be substantially completed in the second half of fiscal 2011. Total
remaining costs for the severance and benefits are estimated to be up to $5 million. |
|
|
|
|
Outsource certain back office functions worldwide. Charges related to these actions are
primarily for severance and benefits. These actions were initiated in the second quarter of
fiscal 2009 and are expected to be substantially completed in the second half of fiscal
2011. Total remaining costs for severance and benefits are expected to range from $5 million
to $10 million. |
Acquisition-related Plans
As a result of business acquisitions, management may deem certain job functions to be
redundant and facilities to be in excess either at the time of acquisition or for a period of time
after the acquisition in conjunction with our integration efforts. As of July 2, 2010,
acquisition-related restructuring liabilities, primarily related to excess facility obligations at
several locations around the world, are expected to be paid over the respective lease terms, the
longest of which extends through fiscal 2018.
11
Restructuring Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
Incurred to |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Adjustments(1) |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 Restructuring Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
2010 Restructuring Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
2008 Restructuring Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Acquisition-related Restructuring Plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Facilities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition, transformation and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restructuring Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total net adjustments or reversals were not material for the three months ended July 2, 2010. |
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification
As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we agree to indemnify our officers
and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving
at our request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be
required to make under these indemnification agreements is not limited; however, we have directors
and officers insurance coverage that reduces our exposure and may enable us to recover a portion
of any future amounts paid. We believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements
in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.
We provide limited product warranties, and the majority of our software license agreements
contain provisions that indemnify licensees of our software from damages and costs resulting from
claims alleging that our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party.
Historically, payments made under these provisions have been immaterial. We monitor the conditions
that are subject to indemnification to identify if a loss has occurred.
Litigation
For a discussion of our pending tax litigation with the Internal Revenue Service relating to
the 2000 and 2001 tax years of Veritas, see Note 11.
On July 7, 2004, a purported class action complaint entitled Paul Kuck, et al. v. Veritas
Software Corporation, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of
Delaware. The lawsuit alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with Veritas
announcement on July 6, 2004 that it expected results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2004 to fall below earlier estimates. The complaint generally seeks an unspecified amount
of damages. Subsequently, additional purported class action complaints have been filed in Delaware
federal court, and, on March 3, 2005, the Court entered an order consolidating these actions and
appointing lead plaintiffs and counsel. A consolidated amended complaint (CAC), was filed on May
27, 2005, expanding the class period from April 23, 2004 through July 6, 2004. The CAC also named
another officer as a defendant and added allegations that Veritas and the named officers made false
or misleading statements in press releases and SEC filings regarding the companys financial
results, which allegedly contained revenue recognized from contracts that were unsigned or lacked
essential terms. The
12
defendants to this matter filed a motion to dismiss the CAC in July 2005; the motion was
denied in May 2006. In April 2008, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement. On July 31, 2008,
the Court held a final approval hearing and, on August 5, 2008, the Court entered an order
approving the settlement. An objector to the fees portion of the settlement has lodged an appeal.
In fiscal 2008, we recorded an accrual in the amount of $21.5 million for this matter and, pursuant
to the terms of the settlement, we established a settlement fund of $21.5 million on May 1, 2008.
We are also involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings that are
incidental to our business. Although adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur in one or more of
the cases, it is not possible to estimate the possible loss or losses from each of these cases. The
final resolution of these lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Note 8. Stock Repurchases
The following table summarizes our stock repurchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except |
|
|
|
per share data) |
|
Total number of shares repurchased |
|
|
14 |
|
Dollar amount of shares repurchased |
|
$ |
200 |
|
Average price paid per share |
|
$ |
14.49 |
|
Range of price paid per share |
|
$ |
13.81 to 15.31 |
|
We have had stock repurchase programs in the past and have repurchased shares on a quarterly
basis since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 under new and existing programs. Our most recent
program was authorized by our Board of Directors on October 27, 2009 to repurchase up to $1 billion
of our common stock. This program does not have an expiration date, and as of July 2, 2010, $547
million remained authorized for future repurchases.
Note 9. Segment Information
As of July 2, 2010, our five reportable segments are the same as our operating segments and
are as follows:
|
|
|
Consumer. Our Consumer segment focuses on delivering our Internet security, PC tune-up,
and backup products to individual users and home offices. |
|
|
|
|
Security and Compliance. Our Security and Compliance segment focuses on providing large,
medium, and small-sized businesses with solutions for endpoint security and management,
compliance, messaging management, and data loss prevention solutions. These products allow
our customers to secure, provision, and remotely access their laptops, PCs, mobile devices,
and servers. We also provide our customers with solutions delivered through our
Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) security offerings. |
|
|
|
|
Storage and Server Management. Our Storage and Server Management segment focuses on
providing large, medium and small-sized businesses with storage and server management,
backup, archiving, and data protection solutions across heterogeneous storage and server
platforms, as well as solutions delivered through our SaaS offerings. |
|
|
|
|
Services. Our Services segment provides customers with implementation services and
solutions designed to assist them in maximizing the value of their Symantec software. Our
offerings include consulting, business critical services, education, and managed security
services. |
|
|
|
|
Other. Our Other segment is comprised of sunset products and products nearing the end of
their life cycle. It also includes general and administrative expenses; amortization of
acquired product rights, intangible assets, and other assets; goodwill impairment charges;
charges such as stock-based compensation and restructuring; and certain indirect costs that
are not charged to the other operating segments. Our provision for income taxes, loss from
joint venture, and non-operating items, such as interest income and interest expense, are
also allocated to this segment. |
13
The accounting policies of the segments are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010 and have not changed as of July 2, 2010. There were no
intersegment sales for the three months ended July 2, 2010.
Segment information
The following table summarizes our operating segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security and |
|
|
Server |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Compliance |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Company |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Three months ended July 2, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
194 |
|
Operating margin of segment |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended July 3, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
Operating margin of segment |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Percentage not meaningful |
Note 10. Stock-based Compensation
The following table summarizes the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Cost of revenue Content, subscription, and maintenance |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Cost of revenue License |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stock-based compensation expense per share basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stock-based compensation expense per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The following table summarizes additional information pertaining to our stock-based
compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per grant data) |
|
Restricted stock units (RSUs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
|
$ |
14.52 |
|
|
$ |
15.38 |
|
Fair value of RSUs granted |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Total fair value of RSUs vested(1) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value per grant |
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
|
$ |
5.16 |
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised(1) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Total unrecognized compensation expense |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Weighted-average remaining vesting period |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
2 years |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes awards assumed in business combinations |
Note 11. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate was approximately (2) % and 33% for the three months ended July 2,
2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively.
The tax expense for the three months ended July 2, 2010 was significantly reduced by the
following benefits recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2011: (1) $38.5 million additional tax
benefit arising from the Veritas v. Commissioner Tax Court decision (see further discussion below),
and (2) $10.5 million tax benefit from current quarter discrete events primarily related to tax
settlements and lapses of statutes of limitations. The tax expense for the three months ended July
3, 2009 included a $7 million tax expense related to the U.S. tax treatment of certain stock based
compensation under Xilinx v. Commissioner (see further discussion below).
The provision for both three-month periods ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 otherwise
reflects a forecast tax rate of 27%. The forecast tax rates for both periods presented reflect the
benefits of lower-taxed foreign earnings and losses from our joint venture with Huawei (joint
venture), domestic manufacturing incentives, and research and development credits (the U.S.
federal R&D tax credit expired on December 31, 2009), partially offset by state income taxes.
On May 27, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned a 2005 U.S. Tax
Court ruling in Xilinx v. Commissioner, holding that stock-based compensation related R&D must be
shared by the participants of a R&D cost sharing arrangement. The Ninth Circuit held that related
parties to such an arrangement must share stock option costs, notwithstanding the U.S. Tax Courts
finding that unrelated parties in such an arrangement would not share such costs. Symantec has a
similar R&D cost sharing arrangement in place. The Ninth Circuits reversal of the U.S. Tax Courts
decision changed our estimate of stock option related tax benefits previously recognized under the
authoritative guidance on income taxes. As a result of the Ninth Circuits ruling, we increased our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits, recording a tax expense of approximately $7 million and a
reduction of additional paid-in capital of approximately $30 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010. On January 13, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals withdrew its issued opinion. On March
22, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a revised decision affirming the decision of
the Tax Court. The Ninth Circuits decision agreed with the Tax Courts finding that related
companies are not required to share such costs. As a result of the Ninth Circuits revised ruling,
we released the liability established in our first quarter of fiscal 2010, which resulted in a $7
million tax benefit and increase of additional paid-in capital of approximately $30 million in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. For fiscal 2010, there was no net income tax expense impact.
On March 29, 2006, we received a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS claiming that we owe $867
million of additional taxes, excluding interest and penalties, for the 2000 and 2001 tax years
based on an audit of Veritas. On June 26, 2006, we filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court
protesting the IRS claim for such additional taxes. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we agreed
to pay $7 million out of $35 million originally assessed by the IRS in connection with several of
the lesser issues covered in the assessment. The IRS agreed to waive the assessment of penalties.
During July 2008, we completed the trial phase of the Tax Court case, which dealt
15
with the remaining issue covered in the assessment. At trial, the IRS changed its position
with respect to this remaining issue, which decreased the remaining amount at issue from $832
million to $545 million, excluding interest. We filed our post-trial briefs in October 2008 and
rebuttal briefs in November 2008 with the U.S. Tax Court.
On December 10, 2009, the U.S. Tax Court issued its opinion, finding that our transfer pricing
methodology, with appropriate adjustments, was the best method for assessing the value of the
transaction at issue between Veritas and its offshore subsidiary. The Tax Court judge provided
guidance as to how adjustments would be made to correct the application of the method used by
Veritas. We remeasured and decreased our liability for unrecognized tax benefits accordingly,
resulting in a $78.5 million tax benefit in the third quarter in fiscal 2010. The Tax Court ruling
is subject to appeal. In June 2010, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning the amount of
the adjustment related to the U.S. Tax Court decision. As a result of the agreement, we further
reduced our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, resulting in an additional $38.5 million tax
benefit in the first quarter in fiscal 2011.
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning our eligibility to claim a lower
tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign subsidiary prior to the July 2005
acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35%
statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since this relates to the
taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of transfer pricing matters at issue in the
IRS examination of Veritas tax years 2002-2005 (see discussion below). To the extent that we owe
taxes as a result of these transfer pricing matters in years prior to the distribution, we
anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will decrease. We currently
estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will be that we will owe $13
million or less, for which an accrual has already been made.
On December 2, 2009, we received a Revenue Agents Report from the IRS for the Veritas 2002
through 2005 tax years assessing additional taxes due. We agree with $30 million of the tax
assessment, excluding interest, but will contest the other $80 million of tax assessed and all
penalties. The unagreed issues concern transfer pricing matters comparable to the one that was
resolved in our favor in the Veritas v. Commissioner Tax Court decision. On January 15, 2010, we
filed a protest with the IRS in connection with the $80 million of tax assessed and currently await
a response from the IRS.
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of
the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
We made a payment of $130 million to the IRS in May 2006 to address the Veritas matters
described above for our 2000-2005 tax years.
Note 12. Earnings per Share
The components of earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Net income per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average outstanding common shares basic |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
Shares issuable from assumed exercise of options |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Dilutive impact of restricted stock and restricted stock units |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted-average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive weighted-average stock options |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
The effect of the warrants issued and options purchased in connection with the convertible
senior notes were excluded from earnings per share for the reasons discussed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.
16
Note 13. Subsequent Event
On May 19, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire certain assets of VeriSign,
Inc. (VeriSign), a publicly-held US-based provider of internet authentication and domain naming
services. The acquired assets relate to the authentication business of VeriSign. As part of the
agreement, we will also acquire VeriSigns 54% interest in VeriSign Japan KK. We anticipate a
purchase price of approximately $1.28 billion to be paid in cash related to this acquisition, which
is subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions. We expect the acquisition to close
during the second quarter of our fiscal 2011.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results
The discussion below contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to safe harbors
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act.
Forward-looking statements include references to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, as
well as statements including words such as expects, plans, anticipates, believes,
estimates, predicts, projects, and similar expressions. In addition, statements that refer to
projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses
and in our industries, the anticipated impacts of acquisitions, and other characterizations of
future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements are only
predictions, based on our current expectations about future events and may not prove to be
accurate. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect
events occurring or circumstances arising after the date of this report. These forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results, performance, or achievements
could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements on the
basis of several factors, including those that we discuss in Risk Factors, set forth in Part I,
Item 1A, of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010. We encourage
you to read that section carefully.
Fiscal Calendar
We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year ending on the Friday closest to March 31. The
three months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 both consisted of 13 weeks.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
Symantec is a global provider of security, storage, and systems management solutions that help
businesses and consumers secure and manage their information. We provide customers worldwide with
software and services that protect, manage and control information risks related to security, data
protection, storage, compliance, and systems management. We help our customers manage cost,
complexity, and compliance by protecting their IT infrastructure as they seek to maximize value
from their IT investments.
Our Operating Segments
Our operating segments are significant strategic business units that offer different products
and services, distinguished by customer needs. Since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we have
operated in five operating segments: Consumer, Security and Compliance, Storage and Server
Management, Services, and Other. For further descriptions of our operating segments, see Note 9 of
the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report. Our reportable
segments are the same as our operating segments.
Financial Results and Trends
Revenue was flat for the three months ended July 2, 2010
as compared to the same period last year. During the end of the quarter sales were negatively impacted by the
lengthening of procurement cycles driven by continued cautiousness among IT buyers. In particular, this affected
sales of our storage management solutions given that these products are extensively utilized by our large enterprise
customers. Offsetting this decline was growth in our Consumer business, driven by our multi-channel strategy.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed the transition to our internally-developed eCommerce platform
for the companys Norton-branded consumer products worldwide, excluding Japan. The fees we had previously paid to
Digital River had been recorded as an offset to revenue; however, we
incur expenses resulting from our eCommerce platform
that appear as a cost of revenue and an operating expense. We continued to experience significantly higher
year-over-year OEM placement fee payments resulting from an increase in PC unit shipments on which our products are included.
Fluctuations in the U.S.
dollar compared to foreign currencies unfavorably impacted our international revenue by approximately $23 million
for the three months ended July 2, 2010 as compared to the same period last year. We are unable to predict the
extent to which revenue in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If our
level of international sales and expenses increase in the future, changes in foreign exchange rates may have a
potentially greater impact on our revenue and operating results.
Our net income was $161 million
for the three months ended July 2, 2010 and was positively impacted by a decrease of $43 million in cost of revenue
related to certain acquired product rights from our acquisition of Veritas becoming fully amortized during the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. Net income was also positively impacted by $49 million of tax benefits primarily resulting
from the reversal of accrued liabilities related to the Veritas Software tax assessment for 2000 and 2001.
18
Critical Accounting Estimates
There have been no changes
in the matters for which we make critical accounting estimates in
the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the three months ended
July 2, 2010 as compared to those disclosed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 2, 2010.
Recently Adopted Authoritative Guidance
Information with respect to Recently Adopted Authoritative Guidance is in Note 1 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated
herein by reference.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Total Net Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
1,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Net revenue was flat for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same period
last year, driven by the items discussed above under Financial Results and Trends.
The changes in revenue for the three months ended July 2, 2010 are further described in the
segment discussions that follow.
19
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue |
|
$ |
1,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue increased for the three months ended July 2,
2010, as compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result of strength in our Consumer
segment where we completed the transition to our new eCommerce platform during the three months
ended July 2, 2010 and continued to benefit from our broad range of distribution agreements with
retailers and PC manufacturers. The growth in content, subscription, and maintenance revenue also
reflects the expansion of our hosted services customer base, as well as for the reasons discussed
above under Financial Results and Trends.
License revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
License revenue |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License revenue decreased for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same
period last year, primarily due to the lengthening of procurement cycles driven by continued
cautiousness among IT buyers, particularly with respect to the storage management products within
the Storage and Server Management segment, as well as for the reasons discussed above under
Financial Results and Trends.
Net revenue and operating income by segment
Consumer segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer revenue |
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer operating income |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Percentage of Consumer revenue |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer revenue increased
for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to increases
in revenue from our premium security suite and for the reasons discussed above under Financial Results and Trends.
Our electronic channel sales are derived from OEMs, subscriptions, upgrades, online sales, and
renewals. For the three months ended July 2, 2010, electronic channel revenue increased as compared
to the same period last year. Electronic sales accounted for approximately 83% of Consumer revenue
for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to 80% in the same period last year.
Operating income for the Consumer segment was flat for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year. Total expenses for the segment increased, primarily as a
result of higher OEM placement fees and costs associated with our new proprietary eCommerce
platform.
20
Security and Compliance segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Security and Compliance revenue |
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security and Compliance operating income |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Percentage of Security and Compliance revenue |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security and Compliance revenue and operating income was flat for the three months ended July
2, 2010, as compared to the same period last year, as stronger sales in our Symantec Hosted
Services and data loss prevention offerings were largely offset by weakness in the small and
medium-sized businesses, as well as the items discussed above under Financial Results and Trends.
Storage and Server Management segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Server Management revenue |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Server Management operating income |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Percentage of Storage and Server Management revenue |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Server Management revenue decreased for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the lengthening of procurement cycles
driven by continued cautiousness among IT buyers, particularly with respect to our storage
management products, as well as the items discussed above under Financial Results and Trends.
Operating income for the Storage and Server Management segment decreased for the three months
ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same period last year, as the decrease in revenue exceeded
the decrease in expenses. The decrease in expenses was due to our ongoing focus on cost efficiency.
Services segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenue |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services operating income |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Percentage of Services revenue |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenue and operating income was consistent for the three months ended July 2, 2010,
as compared to the same period last year.
21
Other segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating loss |
|
$ |
(353 |
) |
|
$ |
(415 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Percentage of Other revenue |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Percentage not meaningful |
Revenue from our Other segment consists primarily of sunset products and products nearing the
end of their life cycle. The operating loss of our Other segment includes general and
administrative expenses; amortization of acquired product rights, other intangible assets, and
other assets; charges such as stock-based compensation and restructuring; and certain indirect
costs that are not charged to the other operating segments.
Net revenue by geographic region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Americas (U.S., Canada and Latin America) |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
784 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) |
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific/Japan |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies unfavorably impacted our
international revenue by $23 million.
Americas revenue increased for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same
period last year, primarily due to increased revenue related to our Consumer segment, partially
offset by decreased revenue related to our Storage and Server Management segment.
EMEA revenue decreased for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same period
last year, primarily due to the impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates and for the
reasons discussed above under Financial Results and Trends.
Asia Pacific Japan revenue increased for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to
the same period last year, primarily due to strength in our Consumer and Security and Compliance
segments.
Our international sales are and will continue to be a significant portion of our net revenue.
As a result, net revenue will continue to be affected by foreign currency exchange rates as
compared to the U.S. dollar. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenue in future periods
will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If international sales become a
greater portion of our total sales in the future, changes in foreign currency exchange rates may
have a potentially greater impact on our revenue and operating results.
22
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Gross margin |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue consists primarily of the amortization of acquired product rights, fee-based
technical support costs, costs of billable services, payments to OEMs under revenue-sharing
arrangements, manufacturing, and direct material costs, and royalties paid to third parties under
technology licensing agreements.
Cost of revenue decreased for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same
period last year, primarily due to a decrease in amortization of acquired product rights related to
our acquisition of Veritas.
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance |
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
As a percentage of related revenue |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance consists primarily of fee-based technical
support costs, costs of billable services, and payments to OEMs under revenue-sharing agreements.
Cost of content, subscription, and maintenance as a percentage of related revenue remained
consistent for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as compared to the same period last year.
However, the increase in total costs is primarily due to higher technical support costs and credit
card processing fees, offset by a decrease in royalties.
Cost of license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
)% |
As a percentage of related revenue |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license
consists primarily of royalties paid to third parties under technology
licensing agreements, manufacturing and direct material costs. Cost of license remained
consistent as a percentage of the related revenue for the three months ended July 2, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year.
23
Amortization of acquired product rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired product rights |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired product rights are comprised of developed technologies and patents from acquired
companies. The decrease in amortization for the three months ended July 2, 2010 as compared to the
same period last year is primarily due to certain acquired product rights from our acquisition of
Veritas becoming fully amortized during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses overview
Our operating expenses during the three months ended July 2, 2010 were favorably impacted by
the restructuring plans discussed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing expense |
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense |
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense |
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing, research and development and general and
administrative expenses remained consistent during the three months ended July 2, 2010.
Sales and marketing expense increased slightly during the three months ended July 2, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year, as a result of increased OEM placement fees and costs
associated with the deployment of our new proprietary eCommerce platform.
Research and development expense decreased during the three months ended July 2, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year, as a result of a shift of labor to lower cost regions.
General and administrative expense increased slightly for the three months ended July 2, 2010,
as compared to the same period last year, due to acquisition-related expenses from our fiscal 2011
acquisitions.
24
Amortization of other purchased intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other purchased intangible assets |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other purchased intangible assets are comprised of customer relationships and tradenames.
Amortization was flat for the three months ended July 2, 2010 compared to the same period last
year.
Restructuring and transformation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities and other |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition, transformation and other costs |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and transformation |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restructuring and transformation charges for the three months ended July 2, 2010 primarily
consisted of severance and charges related to the 2011 Restructuring Plan (2011 Plan), the 2010
Restructuring Plan (2010 Plan), and transition and transformation costs related to the
outsourcing of certain back office functions.
Total remaining severance charges are estimated to range from $85 million to $125 million,
primarily for the 2011 Plan and 2010 Plan. Total remaining facilities charges are estimated to
range from $25 million to $35 million related to the 2010 Plan. Total remaining costs for the
transition and transformation activities associated with outsourcing back office functions are
estimated to be approximately $10 million to $15 million. For further information on restructuring,
see Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of assets held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended July 3, 2009, we recognized an impairment of $3 million on
certain land and buildings classified as held for sale. The impairments were recorded in accordance
with the authoritative guidance that requires a long-lived asset classified as held for sale to be
measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell.
25
Non-operating Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income and expense was flat during the three months ended July 2, 2010, as
compared to the same period last year.
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
)% |
Effective tax rate on earnings |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate was approximately (2) % and 33% for the three months ended July 2,
2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively.
The tax expense for the three months ended July 2, 2010 was significantly reduced by the
following benefits recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2011: (1) $38.5 million additional tax
benefit arising from the Veritas v. Commissioner Tax Court decision (see further discussion below),
and (2) $10.5 million tax benefit from current quarter discrete events primarily related to tax
settlements and lapses of statutes of limitations. The tax expense for the three months ended July
3, 2009 included a $7 million tax expense related to the U.S. tax treatment of certain stock based
compensation under Xilinx v. Commissioner (see further discussion below).
The provision for both three-month periods ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 otherwise
reflects a forecast tax rate of 27%. The forecast tax rates for both periods presented reflect the
benefits of lower-taxed foreign earnings and losses from our joint venture with Huawei (joint
venture), domestic manufacturing incentives, and research and development credits (the U.S.
federal R&D tax credit expired on December 31, 2009), partially offset by state income taxes.
On May 27, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned a 2005 U.S. Tax
Court ruling in Xilinx v. Commissioner, holding that stock-based compensation related R&D must be
shared by the participants of an R&D cost sharing arrangement. The Ninth Circuit held that related
parties to such an arrangement must share stock option costs, notwithstanding the U.S. Tax Courts
finding that unrelated parties in such an arrangement would not share such costs. Symantec has a
similar R&D cost sharing arrangement in place. The Ninth Circuits reversal of the U.S. Tax Courts
decision changed our estimate of stock option related tax benefits previously recognized under the
authoritative guidance on income taxes. As a result of the Ninth Circuits ruling, we increased our
liability for unrecognized tax benefits, recording a tax expense of approximately $7 million and a
reduction of additional paid-in capital of approximately $30 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2010. On January 13, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals withdrew its issued opinion. On
March 22, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a revised decision affirming the decision
of the Tax Court. The Ninth Circuits decision agreed with the Tax Courts finding that related
companies are not required to share such costs. As a result of the Ninth Circuits revised ruling,
we released the liability established in our first quarter of fiscal 2010, which resulted in a
$7 million tax benefit and increase of additional paid-in capital of approximately $30 million in
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. For fiscal 2010, there was no net income tax expense impact.
On March 29, 2006, we received a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS claiming that we owe $867
million of additional taxes, excluding interest and penalties, for the 2000 and 2001 tax years
based on an audit of Veritas. On June 26, 2006, we filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court
protesting the IRS claim for such additional taxes. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we agreed
to pay $7 million out of $35 million originally assessed by the IRS in connection with several of
the lesser issues covered in the assessment. The IRS agreed to waive the assessment of penalties.
During July 2008, we completed the trial phase of the Tax Court case, which dealt
26
with the
remaining issue covered in the assessment. At trial, the IRS changed its position with respect to
this remaining issue, which decreased the remaining amount at issue from $832 million to $545
million, excluding interest. We filed our post-trial briefs in October 2008 and rebuttal briefs in
November 2008 with the U.S. Tax Court.
On December 10, 2009, the U.S. Tax Court issued its opinion, finding that our transfer pricing
methodology, with appropriate adjustments, was the best method for assessing the value of the
transaction at issue between Veritas and its offshore subsidiary. The Tax Court judge provided
guidance as to how adjustments would be made to correct the application of the method used by
Veritas. We remeasured and decreased our liability for unrecognized tax benefits accordingly,
resulting in a $78.5 million tax benefit in the third quarter in fiscal 2010. The Tax Court ruling
is subject to appeal. In June 2010, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning the amount of
the adjustment related to the U.S. Tax Court decision. As a result of the agreement, we further
reduced our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, resulting in an additional $38.5 million tax
benefit in the first quarter in fiscal 2011.
In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning our eligibility to claim a lower
tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas foreign subsidiary prior to the July 2005
acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and therefore eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal
rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known
since this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of transfer pricing
matters at issue in the IRS examination of Veritas tax years 2002-2005 (see discussion below). To
the extent that we owe taxes as a result of these transfer pricing matters in years prior to the
distribution, we anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will
decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will
be that we will owe $13 million or less, for which an accrual has already been made.
On December 2, 2009, we received a Revenue Agents Report from the IRS for the Veritas 2002
through 2005 tax years assessing additional taxes due. We agree with $30 million of the tax
assessment, excluding interest, but will contest the other $80 million of tax assessed and all
penalties. The unagreed issues concern transfer pricing matters comparable to the one that was
resolved in our favor in the Veritas v. Commissioner Tax Court decision. On January 15, 2010, we
filed a protest with the IRS in connection with the $80 million of tax assessed and currently await
a response from the IRS.
We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of
the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.
We made a payment of $130 million to the IRS in May 2006 to address the Veritas matters
described above for our 2000-2005 tax years.
Loss from joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from joint venture |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
)% |
Percentage of total net revenue |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 5, 2008, Symantec formed Huawei-Symantec, Inc. (joint venture) with a subsidiary
of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (Huawei). The joint venture is domiciled in Hong Kong with
principal operations in Chengdu, China. The joint venture develops, manufactures, markets, and
supports security and storage appliances to global telecommunications carriers and enterprise
customers. We record our proportionate share of the joint ventures net income or loss one quarter
in arrears.
For the three months ended July 2, 2010, we recorded a loss of approximately $7 million
related to our share of the joint ventures net loss incurred for the period from January 1, 2010
to March 31, 2010. For the three months ended July 3, 2009, we recorded a loss of approximately $12
million related to our share of the joint ventures net loss for the period from January 1, 2009 to
March 31, 2009.
27
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of Cash
We have historically relied on cash flow from operations, borrowings under a credit facility,
issuances of convertible notes, and equity securities for our liquidity needs. Key sources of cash
include earnings from operations, existing cash and cash equivalents, and our revolving credit
facility.
In fiscal 2007, we entered into a five-year $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit
facility that expires in July 2011. In order to be able to draw on the credit facility, we must
maintain certain covenants, including a specified ratio of debt to earnings (before
interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and impairment) as well as certain other
non-financial covenants. As of July 2, 2010, we were in compliance with all required covenants and
there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.
As of July 2, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2.7 billion and short-term
investments of $13 million resulting in a net liquidity position of approximately $3.7 billion,
which is defined as unused availability of the credit facility, cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances, our borrowing capacity, and cash
generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditures
requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Uses of Cash
Our principal cash requirements include working capital, capital expenditures, payments of
principal and interest on our debt, and payments of taxes. Also, we may, from time to time, engage
in the open market purchase of our convertible notes prior to their maturity. In addition, we
regularly evaluate our ability to repurchase stock, pay debts and acquire other businesses.
Acquisition-Related. For the three months ended July 2, 2010, we acquired PGP Corporation
(PGP) and GuardianEdge Technologies, Inc. (GuardianEdge) for an aggregate payment of $362
million, net of cash acquired, and invested in a privately-held company for $6 million. For the
three months ended July 3, 2009, we invested in a privately-held company for $16 million. For the
three months ended October 1, 2010, we expect to use approximately $1.3 billion of our cash balance
to acquire the identity and authentication business of VeriSign, Inc.
Convertible Senior Notes. In June 2006, we issued $1.1 billion principal amount of 0.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2011, and $1.0 billion principal amount of 1.00% Convertible
Senior Notes (collectively the Senior Notes) due June 15, 2013, to initial purchasers in a
private offering for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to SEC Rule 144A. For the
three months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, we have not repaid any of this debt other than
the related interest costs.
Stock Repurchases. For the three months ended July 2, 2010, we repurchased 14 million shares,
or $200 million, of our common stock. For the three months ended July 3, 2009, we repurchased 8
million shares, or $123 million, of our common stock. As of July 2, 2010, we had $547 million
remaining under the plan authorized for future repurchases.
28
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes selected items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $335 million for the three months ended July 2,
2010, which resulted from net income of $161 million adjusted for non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization charges of $194 million and stock-based compensation expense of
$35 million, as well as increased collections of trade receivables of $285 million. These amounts
were partially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $177 million, accrued compensation and
other liabilities of $109 million, and income taxes payable of $76 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $371 million for the three months ended July 3,
2009, which resulted from net income of $74 million adjusted for non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization charges of $246 million, stock-based compensation expense of $49
million, as well as increased collections of trade receivables of $229 million. These amounts were
partially offset by decreases in deferred revenue of $142 million and accrued compensation and
benefits of $90 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $418 million for the three months ended July 2, 2010
and was primarily due to payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $362 million and $52
million paid for capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $116 million for the three months ended July 3,
2009 and was primarily due to proceeds of $183 million from the sale of short-term investments,
partially offset by $54 million paid for capital expenditures and $16 million paid for an equity
investment in a privately-held company.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $207 million for the three months ended July 2, 2010
and was primarily due to repurchases of our common stock of $200 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $128 million for the three months ended July 3, 2009
and was primarily due to repurchases of our common stock of $123 million.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations during the three months
ended July 2, 2010 as compared to the contractual obligations disclosed in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7, of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.
29
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in our market risk exposures during the three months
ended July 2, 2010 as compared to the market risk exposures disclosed in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7A, of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The SEC defines the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a companys controls and
other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer have concluded, based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act) by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months
ended July 2, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
(c) Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors
and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information with respect to this Item may be found in Note 7 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated into this
Part II, Item 1 by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
A description of the risks associated with our business, financial condition, and results of
operations is set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 2, 2010. There have been no material changes in our risks from such description.
30
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Stock repurchases during the three months ended July 2, 2010 were as follows:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Value of Shares That |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
April 3, 2010 to April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
May 1, 2010 to May 28, 2010 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
May 29, 2010 to July 2, 2010 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
14.51 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
14.49 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For information regarding our stock repurchase programs, see Note 9 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
31
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
Filed with |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
|
this 10-Q |
2.01
|
** |
|
Acquisition Agreement by and between VeriSign, Inc. and
Symantec Corporation, dated May 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation Bylaws, as amended May 4, 2010
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-17781
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
05/04/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
* |
|
FY11 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02
|
* |
|
FY11 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Executive Vice
President and Group President 90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.03
|
* |
|
FY11 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Executive Vice
President and Group President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.04
|
* |
|
FY11 Long Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
Filed with |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
|
this 10-Q |
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
** |
|
The exhibits and schedules to this agreement have been omitted
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. We will furnish
copies of any of the exhibits and schedules to the SEC upon
request. |
|
|
|
This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance
with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in
these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or
12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes
of section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not
subject to liability under these sections. |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Enrique Salem
|
|
|
|
Enrique Salem |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James A. Beer
|
|
|
|
James A. Beer |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: August 4, 2010
34
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Q1 FY11 Form 10-Q
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
Filed with |
Number |
|
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
|
this 10-Q |
2.01
|
** |
|
Acquisition Agreement by and between VeriSign, Inc. and Symantec
Corporation, dated May 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
Symantec Corporation Bylaws, as amended May 4, 2010
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-17781
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
05/04/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
* |
|
FY11 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02
|
* |
|
FY11 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Executive Vice
President and Group President 90%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.03
|
* |
|
FY11 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Executive Vice
President and Group President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.04
|
* |
|
FY11 Long Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
|
|
|
|
File |
|
Filed with |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
Date |
|
this 10-Q |
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
** |
|
The exhibits and schedules to this agreement have been omitted
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. We will furnish
copies of any of the exhibits and schedules to the SEC upon
request. |
|
|
|
This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance
with Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in
these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or
12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes
of section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not
subject to liability under these sections. |
36