e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010
|
[ ]
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file number 0-25317
Life Technologies
Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
33-0373077
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
5791 Van Allen Way
Carlsbad, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
92008
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
760-603-7200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights, $0.01 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes [X] or No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes [ ] or No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] or No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X]
No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer [X]
|
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company [ ]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
June 30, 2010 was $8,644,899,832.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrants common
stock as of February 23, 2011 was 180,002,190.
INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants proxy statement to be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with
the registrants 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be
filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this annual report on
Form 10-K.
Such proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than
120 days after the conclusion of the registrants
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Any statements in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, prospects,
financial condition, assumptions or future events or performance
are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements.
These statements are often, but not always, made through the use
of words or phrases such as believe,
anticipate, should, intend,
plan, will, expect(s),
estimate(s), project(s),
positioned, strategy,
outlook and similar expressions. Additionally,
statements concerning future matters, such as the development of
new products, enhancements of technologies, sales levels and
operating results and other statements regarding matters that
are not historical facts are forward-looking statements.
Accordingly, all such statements involve estimates, assumptions
and relate to uncertainties that could cause our actual results
to differ materially from the results expressed in the
statements. Any forward-looking statements are qualified in
their entirety by reference to the factors discussed throughout
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following cautionary statements identify important factors
that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
those projected in the forward-looking statements made in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Among the key factors that have an impact on our results of
operations are:
|
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to continually develop and offer new
products and services that are commercially successful;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully compete and maintain
the pricing of its products and services;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to maintain its revenue and
profitability during periods of adverse economic and business
conditions;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully integrate and develop
acquired businesses and technologies;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully acquire new products,
services, and technologies through additional acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully secure and deploy
capital;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to satisfy its debt
obligations; and
|
|
|
|
the additional risks and other factors described under the
caption Risk Factors under Item 1A of this
annual report on
Form 10-K;
|
Because the factors referred to above could cause our actual
results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in
any forward-looking statements made by us, you should not place
undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Further,
any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this
Annual Report on Form 10K, and we undertake no obligation to
update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after such date to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and
their emergence is impossible for us to predict. In addition, we
cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the
extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause
actual results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statements.
1
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
unless the context requires otherwise, Life
Technologies, Life Technologies Corporation,
Company, we, our, and
us means Life Technologies Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
General
Development of Our Business
Life Technologies Corporation is a global life sciences company
dedicated to improving the human condition. Our systems,
consumables and services enable scientific researchers and
commercial markets to accelerate scientific exploration, leading
to discoveries and developments that better the quality of life.
Our products are also used in forensics, food and water safety
and animal health testing and other industrial applications.
The Company delivers a broad range of products and services,
including systems, instruments, reagents, software, and custom
services. Our growing portfolio of products includes innovative
technologies for PCR, sample preparation, cell culture, RNA
interference analysis, functional genomics research, proteomics
and cell biology applications, capillary electrophoresis based
sequencing, next generation sequencing, as well as clinical
diagnostic applications, forensics, animal, food, pharmaceutical
and water testing analysis. The Company also provides our
customers convenient and value-added purchasing options through
thousands of sales and service professionals,
e-commerce
capabilities and onsite supply center solutions.
The Company began operations as a California partnership in 1987
and incorporated in California in 1989. In 1997, the Company
reincorporated as a Delaware corporation. On November 21,
2008, Invitrogen Corporation (also referred to as
Invitrogen), a predecessor company to Life
Technologies, completed the acquisition of Applied Biosystems,
Inc. (also referred to as AB or Applied
Biosystems) to form a new company called Life
Technologies Corporation. Life Technologies has a
workforce of approximately 11,000 people, has a presence in
more than 160 countries, and possesses a rapidly growing
intellectual property estate. Currently, the Company owns
and/or has
exclusive license to over 4,000 patents. Our corporate
headquarters are located in Carlsbad, California.
The Company has recently taken part in noteworthy transactions
that are helping to shape its future, notably:
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2010, the Company closed a transaction whereby it
sold its 50% ownership stake in the Applied Biosystems/MDS
Analytical Technologies Instruments joint venture and all assets
and liabilities directly related to the Companys mass
spectrometry business to Danaher Corporation for
$428.1 million in cash, excluding transactions costs, and
recorded a gain of $37.3 million during the year ended
December 31, 2010; and
|
|
|
|
In October 2010, the Company acquired Ion Torrent Systems
Incorporated (Ion Torrent), a business that has developed a
method of DNA sequencing through the use of semiconductor
technology, resulting in a sequencing system that is simpler,
faster, less expensive and more scalable than other sequencing
technologies.
|
The Companys website is www.lifetechnologies.com.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
our Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments thereto are made available without charge on
the website. These materials are available on the website as
soon as reasonably practicable after filing these materials
with, or furnishing them to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Financial
Information About Our Segments and Geographic Areas
In 2009, in connection with the acquisition of AB and the
resulting reorganization, the Company determined, in accordance
with The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 280, Segment
Reporting, to operate as one operating segment. The Company
believes our chief operating decision maker (CODM) makes
decisions based on the Company as a whole. In addition to the
CODM making decisions for the Company as a whole, the divisions
within the Company share similar customers and types of products
and services which derive revenues and have consistent product
margins. Accordingly, the Company
2
operates and reports as one reporting segment. The Company will
disclose the revenues for each of its internal divisions in
Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations to allow the
reader of the financial statements the ability to gain some
transparency into the operations of the Company. We have
restated historical divisional revenue information to conform to
the current year presentation.
Financial information about our revenues from foreign countries
and assets located in those countries is also included in the
notes to our consolidated financial statements, which begin on
page 60.
Description
of Our Business
Company
Overview
We are a global life sciences company dedicated to helping our
customers make scientific discoveries and applying those
discoveries to improving the human condition. Our systems,
reagents, and services enable scientific researchers to
accelerate scientific exploration, driving to discoveries and
developments that better the quality of life. Life
Technologies customers do their work across the biological
spectrum, advancing genomic medicine, regenerative science,
molecular diagnostics, agricultural and environmental research
and 21st century forensics. The Company has a workforce of
approximately 11,000 people, has a presence in more than
160 countries, and possesses a rapidly growing intellectual
property estate of over 4,000 patents and exclusive licenses
around the world.
Our systems and reagents enable, simplify and accelerate a broad
spectrum of biological research of genes, proteins and cells
within academic and life science research and commercial
applications. Our scientific expertise assists in making
biodiscovery research techniques more effective and efficient
for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agricultural, clinical,
government and academic scientific professionals with
backgrounds in a wide range of scientific disciplines.
The Company offers many different products and services, and is
continually developing
and/or
acquiring others. Some of our specific product categories
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Capillary electrophoresis,
SOLiDtm,
and Ion
Torrenttm
DNA sequencing systems and reagents, which are used to discover
sources of genetic and epigenetic variation, to catalog the DNA
structure of organisms, to verify the composition of genetic
research material, and to apply these genetic analysis
discoveries in markets such as forensic human identification and
clinical diagnostics.
|
|
|
High-throughput gene cloning and expression
technology, which allows customers to clone and expression-test
genes on an industrial scale.
|
|
|
Pre-cast electrophoresis products, which improve the speed,
reliability and convenience of separating nucleic acids and
proteins.
|
|
|
Antibodies, which allow researchers to capture and label
proteins, visualize their location through use of dyes and
discern their role in disease.
|
|
|
Magnetic beads, which are used in a variety of settings, such as
attachment of molecular labels, nucleic acid purification, and
organ and bone marrow tissue type testing.
|
|
|
Molecular Probes fluorescence-based technologies, which
facilitate the labeling of molecules for biological research and
drug discovery.
|
|
|
Transfection reagents, which are widely used to transfer genetic
elements into living cells enabling the study of protein
function and gene regulation.
|
|
|
PCR and Real Time PCR systems, reagents and assays, which enable
researchers to amplify and detect targeted nucleic acids (DNA
and RNA molecules) for a host of applications in molecular
biology.
|
|
|
Cell culture media and reagents used to preserve and grow
mammalian cells, which are used in large scale cGMP
bio-production facilities to produce large molecule biologic
therapies.
|
|
|
RNA Interference reagents, which enable scientists to
selectively turn off genes in biology systems to
gain insight into biological pathways.
|
3
Scientific
Background
The genome is the entirety of a living organisms
genetic information coded in the form of DNA. Within the genome
are individual segments of DNA that form genes, which encode the
instructions used by cells to create proteins. These
instructions are relayed from the gene to the cells
protein assembly machinery through the intermediary of a
transcript composed of RNA. The total set of RNA transcripts
expressed by the genome in a cell or organism is known as the
transcriptome. The proteins, however, ultimately carry
out most of the essential biological activities required for
life. The total complement of proteins expressed by the genome
in a cell or organism is known as the proteome. Proteins
have many different functional properties, and are the key
biological molecules involved in processes such as growth,
development, reproduction, aging, and disease.
Researchers seeking to learn the causes of disease to develop
treatments have historically used molecular biology techniques
focused on the study of single or small numbers of genes and the
proteins they code for, as opposed to the study of the genome or
proteome as a whole. The study of the genome is known as
genomics, while the study of the proteome is known as
proteomics. Technological advances over the past two
decades, including many developed and marketed by Life
Technologies, have rapidly accelerated scientists ability
to perform genomics and proteomics research. These advances
include the development of automated instruments that can
perform high-throughput analysis of samples and specialized
reagents and consumables that enable scientific researchers to
perform analysis accurately and efficiently. Genomics research
has evolved from the sequencing of the first viral genome of
just over 5,000 bases three decades ago to the complete
sequencing of the more than 3 billion bases of the human
genome in 2001. The recent advances in genomic and proteomic
studies have also led to the rapid development of
bioinformatics, which integrates biology and computing to
analyze the massive amounts of data generated by such studies.
Following the sequencing of the complete human genome,
functional genomics and the study of the transcriptome and
proteome have come to prominence. Rather than replacing the
study of single genes, these disciplines have complemented and
enhanced such studies. For example, in the field of drug
development, studies in genomics and proteomics combined with an
understanding of drug action and efficacy can help to identify
patient groups for which the drug may be particularly
beneficial. Pharmaceutical-based research also includes the
development of safe and effective methods of bioproduction for
protein-based therapeutic agents.
In the field of disease treatment, research is often focused on
the discovery of biomarkers. These are transcripts or
proteins that are used as markers for the diagnosis of certain
disease states and their prognosis for treatment.
High-throughput production and screening of peptides (short
chains of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins) can also
assist in the design of vaccines against diseases for which
current vaccines are ineffective or unavailable.
In medicine, basic research is focused on cell differentiation,
cell proliferation, and cell death. These have wide applications
in the study of regenerative medicine, which focuses on
repairing organs damaged by trauma or disease. The study of
aging is another important field in this category, and focuses
on alleviating debilitating conditions associated with the aging
process.
Customer
Base
The Company divides its target customer base into three major
categories:
|
|
|
|
|
Life science researchers. The life sciences research
market consists of laboratories generally associated with
universities, medical research centers, government institutions
(such as the United States National Institutes of Health, or the
NIH), and other research institutions as well as biotechnology,
pharmaceutical, diagnostic, energy, agricultural, and chemical
companies. Researchers at these institutions are using our
products and services in a broad spectrum of scientific
activities, such as searching for drugs or other techniques to
combat a wide variety of diseases (namely cancer and viral and
bacterial diseases); researching diagnostics for disease
identification or for improving the efficacy of drugs to
targeted patient groups; and assisting in vaccine design,
bioproduction, and agriculture. Our products and services
provide the research tools needed for genomics studies,
proteomics studies, gene splicing, cellular analysis, and other
key research applications that are required by these life
science researchers. In
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
addition, our research tools are important in the development of
diagnostics for disease determination as well as identification
of patients for more targeted therapies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial producers of biopharmaceutical and other high
valued proteins. The Company serves industries that apply
genetic engineering to the research and commercial production of
useful but otherwise rare or difficult to obtain substances,
such as proteins, interferons, interleukins, t-PA and monoclonal
antibodies. Once a discovery has been proven, the manufacturers
of these materials require larger quantities of the same sera
and other cell growth media that the Company provides in smaller
quantities to researchers. Industries involved in the commercial
production of genetically engineered products include the
biotechnology pharmaceutical, food processing and agricultural
industries.
|
|
|
|
Users who apply our technologies to enable or improve
particular activities. The Company provides tools that apply
our technology to enable or improve activities in particular
markets, which we refer to as applied markets. The
current focus of our products for these industries is in the
areas of: forensic analysis, which is used to identify
individuals based on their DNA; quality and safety testing, such
as testing required to measure food, beverage, or environmental
quality and pharmaceutical manufacturing quality and safety;
production animal health testing, which enables the detection of
pathogens in livestock; and biosecurity, which refers to
products needed in response to the threat of biological
terrorism and other malicious, accidental, and natural
biological dangers. The Applied Biosystems branded forensic
testing and human identification products and services are
innovative and segment-leading tools that have been widely
accepted by investigators and laboratories in connection with
criminal investigations, the exoneration of individuals wrongly
accused or convicted of crimes, identifying victims of
disasters, and paternity testing.
|
While the Company does not believe that any single customer or
small group of customers is material to our business as a whole
or to our product segments, approximately 20% of our customers
in our target markets receive funding for their research, either
directly or indirectly, from grants from the federal government
of the United States or state and local governments.
Our
Products
As of December 31, 2010, the Company operated its business
under three divisions: Molecular Biology Systems, (also referred
to as MBS); Cell Systems, (also referred to as
CS); and Genetic Systems, (also referred to as
GS). In January 2010, the Company divested its Mass
Spectrometry business to Danaher Corporation, allowing a focus
on the other three, core competencies of the Company.
The MBS division includes the molecular biology-based
technologies, including basic and real-time PCR, RNAi, DNA
synthesis, sample prep, transfection, cloning and protein
expression profiling and protein analysis. The CS division
includes all product lines used in the study of cell function,
including cell culture media and sera, stem cells and related
tools, cellular imaging products, antibodies, drug discovery
services and cell therapy related products. The GS division
includes next generation sequencing systems and reagents,
including capillary electrophoresis, the
SOLiDtm
and Ion
Torrenttm
systems, as well as reagent kits developed specifically for
applied markets, such as forensics and food safety and animal
health.
Since the acquisition of AB in 2008, the Company has completed
the operating integration of the combined companies. A key part
of this process was a reorganization of the business, research
and development, and sales and marketing organizations within
Life Technologies to optimize the unique technologies and
capabilities of the combined companies to drive new developments
and business performance.
The Company plans to continue to introduce new research products
and services, as we believe continued new product development
and rapid product introduction is a critical competitive factor
in all of the industries that the Company serves. The Company
expects to continue to increase expenditures in sales and
marketing, manufacturing and research and development to support
increased levels of sales and to augment our long-term
competitive position.
5
Service
and Support
The Company generally provides limited warranties on all
equipment at the time of sale for periods of time ranging up to
two years from the date of sale depending on the product subject
to warranty. However, warranties included with any sale can
vary, and may be excluded altogether, depending on the
particular circumstances of the sale. The sale of some equipment
includes installation, basic user training,
and/or
application support. The Company also offers service contracts
to our customers that are generally one to five years in
duration after the original warranty period. The Company
provides both repair services and routine maintenance services
under these arrangements, and also offers repair and maintenance
services on a time and material basis to customers that do not
have service contracts. Service in the United States and major
markets outside of the United States is provided by our service
staff and, in some foreign countries, service is provided
through third-party arrangements. In addition, we offer custom
services such as cell line development, custom media
modification, development of primers and custom assays. These
services are typically offered with limited warranties.
Research
and Development
The Company has a strong history of refining pioneering
technology to create novel products for biosciences research
through the combination of expertise in biology, chemistry, and
engineering. The Company continues to build on that legacy by
generating innovative products across a broader continuum of
discovery, development, and validation for the life sciences
enterprise. In 2010, the Company launched nearly 1,000 new
products, in fields ranging from genomic analysis to cell
biology to human identification and diagnostics. The Company
invested $375.5 million, $337.1 million and
$142.5 million in research and development in the years
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately
1,250 employees engaged in research and development
activities in the United States, Japan, Israel, Singapore,
India, Ireland, Germany, and Norway. The Company also continues
to maintain a comprehensive network of collaborators and
scientific advisors across the globe. Our research and
development activities are focused in segments where we are a
leader, and in emerging growth areas in which we can utilize our
expertise in instrumentation, reagent and consumable solutions
to develop new market opportunities.
Sales
and Marketing
Our sales and marketing strategy supports our objective of
building equity in Life Technologies as the brand that
manufactures and delivers user-centered, innovative, premium
products and services. Through our
sub-brands,
including Gibco, Ambion, Molecular Probes, Applied Biosystems,
Invitrogen, and others, we provide premiere offerings to life
science researchers and professionals applying biology in their
work, such as forensics and molecular diagnostics. We have well
established
go-to-market
channels including an expansive commercial organization of
approximately 3,200 employees and a presence in more than
160 countries, with a highly educated and specialized sales
force; over 1,000 supply centers worldwide based in our
customers laboratories to provide convenient access to our
products; and world-class
e-commerce
websites that deliver the easiest online experience to find,
decide, and buy our products.
Our sales and support strategy focuses on being a partner of
choice for our customer, which requires us to employ scientific
personnel for our sales and service roles. The Company has two
types of direct sales personnel: generalists and technical sales
specialists. Generalists typically are responsible for total
customer account management. They work closely with the
technical specialists, who have an extensive background in
biology or other scientific fields of study and focus on
specific product offerings. Having a thorough understanding of
biological techniques and the research process allows our sales
representatives to act as advisors to our customers. Our
technical sales representatives also help us identify market
needs and new technologies that we can license and develop into
new products. If our customers have questions about their
products, orders or other support areas, they have full access
by phone or online, to our highly trained technical and customer
service professionals.
Our marketing departments, located in our sites across the
globe, stay connected with our customers changing needs by site
visits, loyalty surveys, market research and a multitude of
other ways to receive and synthesize customer feedback. They use
this knowledge to ensure we are developing and managing the most
premiere portfolio of products that have value and significance
in our customers daily work. The marketing department uses
a variety
6
of marketing communication vehicles and methods to keep
customers informed of the Companys products, technologies,
and offerings. Those vehicles include, but are not limited to
print collateral; newsletters; application notes; direct
mailers, product inserts; posters; and sourcebooks; as well as
emails; webinars; online community forums; and a presence in
social media channels like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, which
allow us to stay connected and engage in dialog with customers
and noncustomers in the science community on a real time basis.
Our
e-commerce
websites include product pages detailing specifications,
technical data, and protocol references to help customers make
informed purchase decisions. Other technical information
includes interactive web tools that allow customers to link to
public research databases, download scientific analyses, and
search for project-specific data. In addition to promoting our
brand in Company sponsored user meetings and thought leader
events, we also maintain a presence at major tradeshows and
science-themed events most frequented by our target customers.
Technology
Licensing
Some of our existing products are manufactured or sold under the
terms of license agreements that require us to pay royalties to
the licensor based on the sales of products containing the
licensed materials or technology. These licenses also typically
impose obligations on us to market the licensed technology.
Although the Company emphasizes our own research and
development, we believe our ability to in-license new technology
from third-parties is, and will continue to be, critical to our
ability to offer competitive new products. Our ability to obtain
these in-licenses depends in part on our ability to convince
inventors that the Company will be successful in bringing new
products incorporating their technology to market. Several
significant licenses or exclusivity rights expire at various
times during the next 15 years. There are certain risks
associated with relying on third-party licensed technologies,
including our ability to identify attractive technologies,
license them on acceptable terms, meet our obligations under the
licenses, renew those licenses should they expire before the
Company retires the related product and the risk that the
third-party may lose patent protection. These risks are more
fully described under the heading Risks Related to the
Development and Manufacturing of our Products and
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property below.
Patents
and Proprietary Technologies
Our products are based on complex, rapidly-developing
technologies. Some of these technologies are covered by patents
the Company owns and others are owned by third-parties and are
used by us under license. The Company has pursued a policy of
seeking patent protection in the United States and other
countries for developments, improvements, and inventions
originating within our organization that are incorporated into
our products or that fall within our fields of interest. The
Company considers the protection of our proprietary technologies
and products in our product divisions to be important to the
success of our business and relies on a combination of patents
and exclusive licenses to protect these technologies and
products.
The Company currently owns
and/or has
exclusive license to over 4,000 patents, including over 1,500 in
the United States. The Company also has numerous pending patent
applications both domestically and internationally. Our success
depends, to a significant degree, upon our ability to develop
proprietary products and technologies and it is important to our
success that we protect the intellectual property associated
with these products and technologies. The Company intends to
continue to file patent applications as we develop new products
and technologies. Patents provide some degree of, but not
complete, protection for our intellectual property.
The Company also relies in part on trade secret, copyright and
trademark protection of our intellectual property. The Company
protects our trade secrets by, among other things, entering into
confidentiality agreements with third-parties, employees and
consultants. It is our general policy to require employees and
consultants to sign agreements to assign to us their interests
in intellectual property arising from their work for us. There
are risks related to our reliance on patents, trade secret,
copyright and trademark protection laws, which are described in
more detail under the heading Risks Related to Our
Intellectual Property below.
The Company is currently, and could in the future, be subject to
lawsuits, arbitrations, investigations, and other legal actions
with private parties and governmental entities, particularly
involving claims for infringement of patents and other
intellectual property rights. From time to time, the Company has
asserted that various competitors and others are infringing our
patents, and, similarly, from time to time, others have asserted
that we were or are
7
infringing patents owned by them. These claims are sometimes
settled by mutual agreement and result in the granting of
licenses by or to us or the cessation of the alleged infringing
activities. However, the Company cannot make any assurances as
to the outcome of any pending or future claims. More information
about the risk factors associated with our reliance on
intellectual property is set forth under the heading Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property below.
Competition
The markets for our products are competitive and are
characterized by the application of advanced technologies. New
technologies in life sciences could make our products and
services obsolete unless the Company continues to develop new
and improved products and services and pursue new opportunities.
Given the breadth of our product and service offerings, our
competition comes from a wide array of competitors with a high
degree of technical proficiency, ranging from specialized
companies that have strengths in narrow segments of the life
science markets to larger manufacturers and distributors
offering a broad array of biotechnology products and services
that have significant financial, operational, research and
development, and sales and marketing resources. These and other
companies may have developed or could in the future develop new
technologies that compete with our products or even render our
products obsolete. Additionally, there are numerous scientists
making materials themselves instead of using kits. The Company
believes that a companys competitive position in the
markets we compete in is determined by product function, product
quality, speed of delivery, technical support, price, breadth of
product line, distribution capabilities, and timely product
development. Our customers are diverse and may place varying
degrees of importance on the competitive attributes listed
above. While it is difficult to rank these attributes for all
our customers in the aggregate, the Company believes we are well
positioned to compete in each category.
Suppliers
Our manufacturing operations require a wide variety of raw
materials, electronic and mechanical components, chemical and
biochemical materials, and other supplies. The Company buys
materials for our products from many suppliers and the Company
has Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) arrangements with many
third-parties for the manufacturing of various products sold
under our platform brand. While there are some raw materials
that the Company obtains from a single supplier, we are not
dependent on any one supplier or group of suppliers for our
business as a whole. Raw materials are generally available from
a number of suppliers. Even so, due to factors out of our
control, some supplies may occasionally be difficult to obtain.
Any interruption in the availability of our manufacturing
supplies could force us to suspend manufacturing of an affected
product and therefore harm our operations. See also the section
titled Adverse conditions in the global economy and
disruption of financial markets below for further analysis.
Government
Regulation
Certain of our products and services, including some products
that are intended for in vitro diagnostics, as well as the
manufacturing process of these products, are subject to
regulation under various portions of the United States Federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and the laws of other
countries. In addition, a number of our manufacturing facilities
are subject to periodic inspection by the United States Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), other product-oriented federal
agencies and various state and local authorities in the United
States as well as foreign governmental authorities.
Additionally, some of our manufacturing facilities must comply
with the requirements of the FDAs Quality System
Regulation, other federal, state and local regulations and other
applicable quality standards such as ISO 9001 or ISO 13485.
Portions of our business are subject to FDCA requirements
including those relating to testing, safety, efficacy, premarket
applications, marketing and labeling. Procedures are in place to
comply with such requirements.
Materials used in development and testing activities at several
of our facilities are also subject to the Controlled Substances
Act, administered by the Drug Enforcement Agency (or DEA).
Procedures for control, use and inventory of these materials are
in place at these facilities.
The Company also employs Centers for Disease Control/National
Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving
Recombinant DNA Molecules, Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories and the hazard
8
classification system recommendations for handling bacterial and
viral agents, with capabilities through biosafety level three.
The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws
and regulations, regulating the emission or discharge of
materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment, in those jurisdictions where we
operate or maintain facilities. We do not believe that any
liability arising under, or compliance with, these laws and
regulations will have a material effect on our business and no
material capital expenditures are expected for environmental
control.
In addition to the foregoing, we are subject to other federal,
state, local and foreign laws and regulations applicable to our
business, including the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the
Toxic Substances Control Act, Department of Transportation
regulations, national restrictions on technology transfer,
import, export and customs regulations, statutes and regulations
relating to government contracting, and similar laws and
regulations in foreign countries. In particular, the Company is
subject to various foreign regulations sometimes restricting the
importation or the exportation of animal-derived products such
as fetal bovine serum.
Workforce
As of December 31, 2010, we had a workforce of
approximately 11,000 people, approximately 3,850 of whom
worked outside the United States. These numbers include
part-time employees and independent contractors. Our success
will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain
employees. The Company faces competition in this regard from
other companies, research and academic institutions, government
entities and other organizations. None of our domestic employees
are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The Company
generally considers relations with our employees to be good.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The Board of Directors appoints executive officers of Life
Technologies, and the Chief Executive Officer has authority to
hire and terminate such officers. Each executive officer holds
office until the earlier of his or her death, resignation,
removal from office or the appointment of his or her successor.
No family relationships exist among any of Life
Technologies executive officers, directors or persons
nominated to serve in those positions. We have listed the ages,
positions held and the periods during which our current
executive officers have served in those positions below:
Gregory T. Lucier (age 46) serves as
Chief Executive Officer of Life Technologies and as Chairman of
the Companys Board of Directors. Previously, he served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Invitrogen Corporation,
which merged with Applied Biosystems in November 2008 to
form Life Technologies. The Company is one of the largest
providers of systems, biological reagents, and services,
supplying scientists around the world in every way that life
science technologies are applied. The company aims to improve
the human condition by enabling basic research, accelerating
drug discovery and development, and advancing scientific
exploration in areas such as regenerative science, molecular
diagnostics, agricultural and environmental research, and
21st century
forensics. Mr. Lucier has leveraged his background in
healthcare management to prepare the Company to participate in
and shape the new era of personalized medicine. Mr. Lucier
serves on the Board of Directors at Synthetic Genomics, Inc. and
CareFusion Corporation, and serves as Chairman of the Board of
Trustees of the Sanford Burnham Medical Research Institute. He
received his B.S. in Engineering from Pennsylvania State
University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
Nicolas M. Barthelemy (age 45) served as
President of Cell Systems of Life Technologies in 2010, and is
now the President of Commercial Operations of Life Technologies.
From January 2006 to November 2008, Mr. Barthelemy served
as Senior Vice President of Cell Systems of Invitrogen
Corporation, which merged with Applied Biosystems in November
2008 to form Life Technologies. Mr. Barthelemy served
as Senior Vice President of Global Operations of Invitrogen
Corporation from March 2004 to January 2006. Prior to joining
Invitrogen Corporation, Mr. Barthelemy held several
executive positions at Biogen Idec, including Vice President of
Manufacturing. Mr. Barthelemy is a recognized operations
leader in large scale mammalian cell culture and purification.
Mr. Barthelemy received his M.S. in Chemical Engineering
from the University of California, Berkeley and the equivalent
of an M.S. in Chemistry from
9
École Supérieure de Physiques et Chimie Industrielles
(Paris, France) and the equivalent of a B.S. in Mathematics,
Physics and Chemistry from Ecole Sainte Geneviève
(Versailles, France).
Joseph C. Beery (age 48) serves as Chief
Information Officer of Life Technologies. From September 2008 to
November 2008, Mr. Beery served as Chief Information
Officer of Invitrogen Corporation, which merged with Applied
Biosystems in November 2008 to form Life Technologies.
Prior to joining Invitrogen Corporation, Mr. Beery held the
executive position of Chief Information Officer at US Airways
and America West Airlines. Mr. Beery also spent ten
(10) years at Motorola Semiconductor, holding various
positions in the computer integrated manufacturing group.
Mr. Beery also served as a manufacturing and software
engineer at NV Philips in Albuquerque, N.M. Mr. Beery holds
a B.S. in Business Administration and Business Computer Systems
from the University of New Mexico.
Bernd Brust (age 43) served as President
of Commercial Operations of Life Technologies in 2010, and is
now the President of Molecular Medicine of Life Technologies.
From November 2006 to November 2008, Mr. Brust served as
Senior Vice President of Global Sales of Invitrogen Corporation,
which merged with Applied Biosystems in November 2008 to
form Life Technologies. Mr. Brust joined Invitrogen
Corporation in 2004 and served as General Manager and Vice
President of European Operations until November 2006. He has
more than fifteen (15) years of sales, commercial
operations, marketing and general management experience. Prior
to joining Invitrogen Corporation, he served in various senior
leadership roles at GE Medical Systems Information Technologies,
including as General Manager of Sales & Marketing.
Mr. Brust holds a degree in Engineering from MTS in
Amsterdam. Mr. Brust is a board member of the
San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and BIOCOM, the
largest regional life science association in the world,
representing more than 550 member companies in Southern
California.
John A. Cottingham (age 56) serves as
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Life Technologies. From May
2004 to November 2008, Mr. Cottingham served as Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary of Invitrogen
Corporation, which merged with Applied Biosystems in November
2008 to form Life Technologies. Mr. Cottingham served
as Vice President, General Counsel of Invitrogen Corporation
from September 2000 to May 2004. Prior to the merger of the
former Life Technologies, Inc., or LTI, with
Invitrogen Corporation in September 2000, Mr. Cottingham
was the General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of LTI from
January 1996 to September 2000. From May 1988 to December 1995,
Mr. Cottingham served as an international corporate
attorney with the Washington, D.C. office of Fulbright and
Jaworski L.L.P. Mr. Cottingham received his B.S. in
Political Science from Furman University, his J.D. from the
University of South Carolina, his L.L.M. in Securities
Regulation from Georgetown University and his M.S.E.L. from the
University of San Diego. Mr. Cottingham is a member of
the board of the San Diego Chapter of the Association of
Corporate Counsel.
Peter M. Dansky (age 50) serves as
President of Molecular & Cell Biology Division of Life
Technologies. Mr. Dansky previously served as President of
the Molecular Biology Systems Division since November 2008. From
July 2007 to November 2008, Mr. Dansky served as President
of Molecular and Cell Biology, Functional Analysis, at Applied
Biosystems, which merged with Invitrogen Corporation in November
2008 to form Life Technologies. Mr. Dansky has more
than twenty-five (25) years of leadership experience in
marketing, product development and sales and general management
from a variety of life science companies, including Affymetrix,
PerSeptive BioSystems and Millipore. Prior to joining Applied
Biosystems in 2004, Mr. Dansky was Vice President of
Marketing for Arcturus Bioscience, where he led commercial
strategy for the life science research and clinical diagnostics
businesses. Mr. Dansky holds an M.B.A. from Boston College
and a M.S. and B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Tufts
University.
Paul D. Grossman, Ph.D.
(age 50) serves as Senior Vice President of Strategy
and Corporate Development of Life Technologies. From May 2007 to
November 2008, Dr. Grossman served as Senior Vice President
of Strategy and Corporate Development of Invitrogen Corporation,
which merged with Applied Biosystems in November 2008 to
form Life Technologies. Prior to joining Invitrogen
Corporation, Dr. Grossman held a variety of leadership
roles during his more than twenty (20) years at Applied
Biosystems. At Applied Biosystems, Dr. Grossman worked as a
research scientist, patent attorney and as Vice President of
Intellectual Property and Chief Group Counsel. Most recently,
Dr. Grossman served as Vice President of Strategy and
Business Development. Dr. Grossman received B.S. and Ph.D.
degrees in Chemical Engineering from the University of
California at Berkeley, a M.S. in Chemical
10
Engineering from the University of Virginia, and a J.D. from
Santa Clara University School of Law. Dr. Grossman has
authored numerous scientific publications and holds more than
seventy (70) United States and foreign patents.
David F. Hoffmeister (age 56) serves as
Chief Financial Officer of Life Technologies. From October 2004
to November 2008, Mr. Hoffmeister served as Chief Financial
Officer and Senior Vice President of Invitrogen Corporation,
which merged with Applied Biosystems in November 2008 to
form Life Technologies. Prior to joining Invitrogen
Corporation, Mr. Hoffmeister held various positions over
the course of twenty (20) years with McKinsey &
Company, most recently as a senior partner serving clients in
the healthcare, private equity and specialty chemicals
industries. Prior to joining McKinsey & Company,
Mr. Hoffmeister held financial positions at GTE and W.R.
Grace. Mr. Hoffmeister is a member of the board of Celanese
Corporation. Mr. Hoffmeister received his B.S. in Business
from the University of Minnesota and an M.B.A. from the
University of Chicago.
Peter M. Leddy, Ph.D.
(age 47) serves as Senior Vice President of Global
Human Resources and Internal Communications of Life
Technologies. From July 2005 to November 2008, Dr. Leddy
served as Senior Vice President of Global Human Resources of
Invitrogen Corporation, which merged with Applied Biosystems in
November 2008 to form Life Technologies. Prior to joining
Invitrogen Corporation, Dr. Leddy held several senior
management positions with Dell Incorporated from 2000 to 2005
and was, most recently, Vice President of Human Resources for
the Americas Operations. Prior to joining Dell Incorporated,
Dr. Leddy served as the Executive Vice President of Human
Resources at Promus Hotel Corporation (Doubletree, Embassy
Suites). Dr. Leddy also served in a variety of executive
and human resource positions at PepsiCo. Dr. Leddy received
his B.A. in Psychology from Creighton University and his M.S.
and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the
Illinois Institute of Technology. Dr. Leddy is a member of
the California State University Professional Science
Masters Executive Board of Directors and is a former board
member of the Biotechnology Institute.
John L. Miller (age 52) serves as
President of Genetic Systems of Life Technologies. From December
2005 to November 2008, Mr. Miller served as Senior Vice
President of Biodiscovery of Invitrogen Corporation, which
merged with Applied Biosystems in November 2008 to
form Life Technologies. Mr. Miller has a strong
background in general management, sales and marketing and
extensive experience in life science, research and diagnostic
markets. Prior to joining Invitrogen Corporation,
Mr. Miller was Vice President, General Manager Americas for
BD Biosciences in San Diego with responsibility for US,
Canada and Latin America. Prior to that, Mr. Miller was
Vice President, General Manager for BD Biosciences Research Cell
Analysis and BD Pharmingen, a division of BD Biosciences.
Additionally, Mr. Miller has held a variety of leadership
positions in the sales and service organizations for BD
Biosciences and for Leica Inc. Mr. Miller has a B.S. in
Engineering from Michigan State University. Mr. Miller is a
member of the board of UCSD CONNECT.
Mark ODonnell (age 54) serves as
Senior Vice President of Global Operations of Life Technologies.
From September 2007 to November 2008, Mr. ODonnell
served as leader of the Global Services Division of Applied
Biosystems, which merged with Invitrogen Corporation in November
2008 to form Life Technologies. Mr. ODonnell has
more than twenty-five (25) years of operational experience
in supply chain, manufacturing and service.
Mr. ODonnell joined Applied Biosystems in 1981 with
Perkin-Elmer Corporation. In 2001, Mr. ODonnell
became Vice President, Global Supply Chain of Applied
Biosystems, managing the forecasting, planning, procurement,
engineering, transportation, and warehousing of raw materials
and products. In 2007, Mr. ODonnell was promoted to
President of Global Service and Supply Chain of Applied
Biosystems with added responsibilities for service, customer
support and business systems groups. Mr. ODonnell
holds a B.A. in Liberal Arts from the University of Connecticut
at Storrs, and an M.B.A. from the University of New Haven,
Connecticut.
Kelli A. Richard (age 42) serves as Vice
President of Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of Life
Technologies. Ms. Richard served as Vice President of
Finance and Chief Accounting Officer of Invitrogen Corporation
prior to the merger with Applied Biosystems in November of 2008,
which formed Life Technologies. Ms. Richard joined
Invitrogen Corporation in August 2005 with more than fourteen
(14) years of accounting and financial reporting
experience, previously serving as Vice President of Accounting
and Reporting. Prior to joining Invitrogen Corporation,
Ms. Richard held the position of Principal Accounting
Officer at Gateway, Inc. Ms. Richard is a certified public
accountant with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree
from the University of Iowa.
Mark P. Stevenson (age 48) serves as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Life Technologies. From
December 2007 to November 2008, Mr. Stevenson served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Applied Biosystems,
11
which merged with Invitrogen Corporation in November 2008 to
form Life Technologies. Mr. Stevenson joined Applied
Biosystems in Europe in 1998, and held roles of increasing
responsibility in Europe and Japan. Mr. Stevenson moved to
the United States in 2004 to establish the Applied Markets
Division of Applied Biosystems and, in 2006, was named President
of the Molecular and Cellular Biology Division of Applied
Biosystems. Mr. Stevenson has more than twenty
(20) years of sales, marketing, and international executive
management experience and received his B.S. in Chemistry from
the University of Reading, UK, and an M.B.A. from Henley
Management School, UK. Mr. Stevenson serves on the Board of
Trustees of the Keck Graduate Institute.
You should carefully consider the following risks, together with
other matters described in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or incorporated herein by reference in evaluating our business
and prospects. If any of the following risks occurs, our
business, financial condition
and/or
operating results could be harmed. In such case, the trading
price of our securities could decline, in some cases
significantly. The risks described below are not the only ones
we face. Additional risks not presently known to us, or that we
currently deem immaterial, may also impair our business
operations. Certain statements in this
Form 10-K
(including certain of the following factors) constitute
forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled
Forward-Looking Statements on page one of this
Form 10-K
for important limitations on these forward-looking statements.
Risks
Related to the Growth of Our Business
The
Company must continually offer new products and
services
The Company sells our products and services in industries that
are characterized by rapid and significant technological
changes, frequent new product and service introductions and
enhancements, and evolving industry standards. Our success
depends in large part on continuous, timely and cost-effective
development and introduction of new products and services as
well as improvements to our existing products and services,
which address these evolving market requirements and are
attractive to customers. For example, if the Company does not
appropriately innovate and invest in new technologies, then our
technologies will become dated and our customers could move to
new technologies offered by our competitors and we could lose
our competitive position in the markets that we serve.
These facts require us to make appropriate investments in the
development and identification of new technologies and products
and services. As a result, the Company is continually looking to
develop, license and acquire new technologies and products and
services to further broaden and deepen our already broad product
and service line. Once the Company has developed or obtained a
new technology, to the extent that we fail to introduce new and
innovative products and services that are accepted by our
markets, we may not obtain an adequate return on our research
and development, licensing and acquisition investments and could
lose revenue opportunities to our competitors, which would be
difficult to regain and could seriously damage our business.
Some of the factors affecting customer acceptance of our
products and services include:
|
|
|
|
|
availability, quality and price as compared to competitive
products and services;
|
|
|
the functionality of new and existing products and services, and
their conformity to industry standards and regulatory standards
that may be applicable to our customers;
|
|
|
the timing of introduction of our products and services as
compared to competitive products and services;
|
|
|
scientists, clinicians and customers opinions
of the products or services utility and our ability
to incorporate their feedback into future products and services;
|
|
|
the extent to which new products and services are within the
scope of our proven expertise;
|
|
|
citation of the products and services in published
research; and
|
|
|
general trends in life sciences research and life science
informatics software development.
|
12
The
Companys future growth depends in part on our ability to
acquire new products, services, and technologies through
additional acquisitions, which may absorb significant resources
and may not be successful
As part of the Companys strategy to develop and identify
new products, services, and technologies, we have made, and
continue to make, acquisitions and investments. In October 2010,
the Company acquired Ion Torrent, which is developing a
technology that performs DNA sequencing through the use of
semiconductor technology. Acquiring and integrating the
operations of all acquired businesses requires significant
efforts, the initial outlay of capital and resources as well as
the coordination of information technologies, research and
development, sales and marketing, operations, manufacturing and
finance. These efforts result in additional expenses and divert
managements time from other projects. Our failure to
manage successfully the growth of the acquired company could
also have an adverse impact on our business. In addition, there
is no guarantee that some of the businesses we acquire will
become profitable or remain so. If our acquisitions do not reach
our initial expectations, we may record unexpected impairment
charges. Our acquisitions involve a number of risks and
financial, managerial and operational challenges, including the
following, any of which could cause significant operating
inefficiencies and adversely affect our growth and profitability:
|
|
|
|
|
any acquired business, technology, service or product could
under-perform relative to our expectations and the price that
the Company paid for it;
|
|
|
the Company could experience difficulty in integrating
personnel, operations and financial and other systems;
|
|
|
the Company could have difficulty in retaining key managers and
other employees of the acquired company;
|
|
|
acquisition-related earnings charges could adversely impact
operating results;
|
|
|
acquisitions could place unanticipated demands on the
Companys management, operational resources and financial
and internal control systems;
|
|
|
we may be unable to achieve cost savings anticipated in
connection with the integration of an acquired business;
|
|
|
in an acquisition, the Company may assume contingent liabilities
that prove greater than anticipated, or deficiencies in internal
controls, and the realization of any of these liabilities or
deficiencies may increase our expenses and adversely affect our
financial position; and
|
|
|
we may have disagreements or disputes with the prior owners of
an acquired business, technology, service or product that may
result in litigation
and/or
resolution expenses and a distraction of our managements
attention.
|
The
Company may not successfully manage its current and future
divestitures, and, as a result, may not achieve some or all of
the expected benefits of such divestitures
We continually evaluate the performance and strategic fit of our
businesses and may decide to sell a business, product line or
technology based on such an evaluation. Divestitures could
involve additional risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products
and personnel;
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business
concerns;
|
|
|
the need to agree to retain or assume certain current or future
liabilities in order to complete the divestiture;
|
|
|
the disruption of our business; and
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees.
|
Any divestitures may result in significant write-offs, including
those related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition. In addition, we may encounter difficulty in
finding buyers or alternative exit strategies at acceptable
prices and terms and in a timely manner. We may not be
successful in managing these or any other significant risks that
we encounter in divesting a business or product line, and, as a
result, may not achieve the expected benefits of the divestiture.
13
The
Company faces significant competition
The markets for our products and services are very competitive
and price sensitive. Our competitors, which could include some
of our customers (such as large pharmaceutical companies) have
significant financial, operational, sales and marketing
resources, and experience in research and development. Our
competitors could develop new technologies that compete with our
products and services or even render our products and services
obsolete. If a competitor develops superior technology or
cost-effective alternatives to our products and services, our
business could be seriously harmed.
The markets for some of our products are also subject to
specific competitive risks. These markets are highly price
competitive. Our competitors have competed in the past by
lowering prices on certain products. If they do so again, we may
be forced to respond by lowering our prices and thereby reduce
our revenues and profits. Failure to anticipate and respond to
price competition may hurt our competitive position.
The Company believes that customers in our markets display a
significant amount of loyalty to their initial supplier of a
particular product. Therefore, it may be difficult to generate
sales to potential customers who have purchased products from
competitors. Additionally, there are numerous scientists making
materials themselves instead of using kits or reagents that we
supply. To the extent we are unable to be the first to develop
and supply new products, customers may buy from our competitors
or make materials themselves, causing our competitive position
to suffer.
Consolidation
trends in both our market and that of our customers have
increased competition
There has been a trend toward industry consolidation in our
markets for the past several years. We expect this trend toward
industry consolidation to continue as companies attempt to
strengthen or hold their market positions in an evolving
industry and as companies are acquired or are unable to continue
operations. We believe that industry consolidation may result in
stronger competitors that are better able to compete as
sole-source vendors for customers. This could lead to more
variability in our operating results and could harm our business.
Additionally, there has been a trend toward consolidation among
our customers, notably, in the pharmaceutical industry.
Consolidation in our customer markets results in increased
competition for important market segments and fewer available
accounts. Larger consolidated customers may be able to exert
increased pricing pressure on us.
Adverse
conditions in the global economy and disruption of financial
markets may significantly harm our revenue, profitability and
results of operations
The global economy has experienced a significant economic
downturn. Continued or worsening economic conditions in the
businesses or geographic areas in which we sell our products
and/or
services could reduce demand for our products
and/or
services and result in a decrease in sales volume that could
have a negative impact on our results of operations. Global
credit and capital markets have experienced unprecedented
volatility and disruption. Business credit and liquidity have
tightened in much of the world. Volatility and disruption of
financial markets could limit our customers ability to
obtain adequate financing or credit to purchase and pay for our
products
and/or
services in a timely manner, or to maintain operations, which
may result in a decrease in sales volume that could harm our
results of operations. General concerns about the fundamental
soundness of domestic and international economies may also cause
our customers to reduce their purchases. Changes in governmental
banking, monetary and fiscal policies to address liquidity and
increase credit availability may not be effective. Significant
government investment and allocation of resources to assist the
economic recovery of sectors that do not include our customers
may reduce the resources available for government grants and
related funding for life sciences research and development.
Economic conditions and market turbulence may also impact our
suppliers ability to supply us with sufficient quantities
of product components in a timely manner, which could impair our
ability to manufacture our products. It is difficult to
determine the extent of the economic and financial market
problems and the many ways in which they may affect our
suppliers, customers and our business in general. Continuation
or further deterioration of these financial and macroeconomic
conditions could significantly harm our sales, profitability and
results of operations.
14
We may
need additional financing in the future to meet our capital
needs or to make opportunistic acquisitions and such financing
may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, and may be
dilutive to existing stockholders.
We intend to continue to invest in our business, including
investing in research and development activities, expanding our
sales and marketing activities, and continuing to make
acquisitions. Our ability to take these and other actions may be
limited by our available liquidity. As a consequence, in the
future, we may need to seek additional financing. We may be
unable to obtain any desired additional financing on terms
favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain any
needed adequate funds for such matters on acceptable terms, we
may be unable to fund our expansion, successfully develop or
enhance products or respond to competitive pressures, any of
which could negatively affect our business. If we raise
additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our
stockholders will experience dilution of their ownership
interest. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may
be subject to limitations on our operations due to restrictive
covenants.
Additionally, our ability to make scheduled payments or
refinance our obligations will depend on our operating and
financial performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing
economic conditions and financial, business and other factors
beyond our control. Recent disruptions in the financial markets,
including the bankruptcy or restructuring of a number of
financial institutions and reduced lending activity, may
adversely affect the availability, terms and cost of credit in
the future. We cannot be sure that recent government initiatives
in response to the disruptions in the financial markets will
stabilize the markets in general or increase liquidity and the
availability of credit to us.
A
significant portion of our sales are dependent upon our
customers capital spending policies and research and
development budgets, and government funding of research and
development programs at universities and other organizations,
which are each subject to significant and unexpected
decreases
Our customers include pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, academic institutions, government laboratories, and
private foundations. Fluctuations in the research and
development budgets at these organizations could have a
significant effect on the demand for our products and services.
Research and development budgets fluctuate due to changes in
available resources, mergers of pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, spending priorities, general economic conditions, and
institutional and governmental budgetary policies. In addition,
a significant portion of our instrument product sales are
capital purchases by our customers, and these policies fluctuate
due to similar factors. Our business could be seriously damaged
by any significant decrease in capital equipment purchases or
life sciences research and development expenditures by
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic
institutions, government laboratories, or private foundations.
The timing and amount of revenues from customers that rely on
government funding of research may vary significantly due to
factors that can be difficult to forecast. Research funding for
life science research has increased more slowly during the past
several years compared to the previous years and has declined in
some countries, and some grants have been frozen for extended
periods of time or otherwise become unavailable to various
institutions, sometimes without advance notice. Government
funding of research and development is subject to the political
process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Other
programs, such as homeland security or defense, or general
efforts to reduce the federal budget deficit could be viewed by
the United States government as a higher priority. These
budgetary pressures may result in reduced allocations to
government agencies that fund research and development
activities. Past proposals to reduce budget deficits have
included reduced NIH and other research and development
allocations. Any shift away from the funding of life sciences
research and development or delays surrounding the approval of
government budget proposals may cause our customers to delay or
forego purchases of our products, which could seriously damage
our business.
Our United States customers generally receive funds from
approved grants at particular times of the year, as determined
by the United States federal government. In the past, such
grants have been frozen for extended periods or have otherwise
become unavailable to various institutions without advance
notice. The timing of the receipt of grant funds affects the
timing of purchase decisions by our customers and, as a result,
can cause fluctuations in our sales and operating results.
15
Some of
our customers are requiring us to change our sales arrangements
to lower their costs, which may limit our pricing flexibility
and harm our business
Some of our customers have developed purchasing initiatives to
reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase to lower
their supply costs. In some cases, these accounts have
established agreements with large distributors, which include
discounts and the distributors direct involvement with the
purchasing process. These activities may force us to supply the
large distributors with our products at a discount to reach
those customers. For similar reasons, many larger customers,
including the United States government, have requested and may
in the future request, special pricing arrangements, including
blanket purchase agreements. These agreements may limit our
pricing flexibility, which could harm our business, financial
condition, and results of operations. For a limited number of
customers, we have, at the customers request, made sales
through third-party online intermediaries, to whom we are
required to pay commissions. If such intermediary sales grow, it
could have a negative impact on our gross margins.
Risks
Related to the Development and Manufacturing of Our
Products
Our
business depends on our ability to license new technologies from
others
The Company believes our ability to in-license new technologies
from third-parties is, and will continue to be, critical to our
ability to offer new products and therefore grow our business. A
significant portion of our current revenues is from products
manufactured or sold under licenses from third parties. Our
ability to gain access to technologies that we need for new
products and services depends in part on
our ability to convince inventors and their agents or assignees
that we can successfully commercialize their inventions. We
cannot guarantee that we will be able to continue to identify
new technologies of interest to our customers, which are
developed by others. Even if we are able to identify new
technologies of interest, we may not be able to negotiate a
license on acceptable terms, or at all.
The
Company must be able to manufacture new and improved products to
meet customer demand on a timely and cost-effective
basis
The Company must be able to resolve in a timely and
cost-effective manner manufacturing issues that may arise from
time to time as we commence production of our complex products.
In addition, as we develop new technologies and products, we
will need to continue to successfully implement new
manufacturing technologies and methods. Unanticipated
difficulties or delays in manufacturing improved or new products
in sufficient quantities to meet customer demand could diminish
future demand for our products increase our manufacturing and
product costs and harm our business.
Our
business could be harmed if we lose rights to technologies that
we have licensed from others
Several of our licenses, such as licenses for biological
materials, have finite terms. We may not be able to renew these
existing licenses on favorable terms, or at all. Licenses for
biological materials such as antibodies are of growing
significance to our product and service offerings. If we lose
the rights to a biological material or a patented technology, we
may need to stop selling these products
and/or
services and possibly other products and services, redesign our
products,
and/or lose
a competitive advantage. While some of our licenses are
exclusive to us in certain markets, potential competitors could
also in-license technologies that we fail to license exclusively
and potentially erode our competitive position for these and
other products and services. Our licenses also typically subject
us to various economic and commercialization obligations. If we
fail to comply with these obligations, we could lose important
rights under a license, such as exclusivity. In some cases, we
could lose all rights under a license. Loss of such rights
could, in some cases, harm our business.
In addition, some rights granted under the license could be lost
for reasons outside of our control. For example, the licensor
could lose patent protection for a number of reasons, including
invalidity of the licensed patent, or a third party could obtain
a patent that curtails our freedom to operate under one or more
licenses. Changes in patent law could affect the value of the
licensed technology. We may receive third-party claims of
intellectual property infringement for which we may not be
indemnified by the licensor.
16
Violation of government regulations or quality programs could
harm demand for our products or services, and the evolving
nature of government regulations could have an adverse impact on
our business
Some of our products and tests are regulated by the FDA and
comparable agencies in other countries. As applicable, we must
comply with medical device and other FDA-related and comparable
agency laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws
and regulations can lead to sanctions by these agencies,
including warning letters, product recalls, product seizures,
consent decrees and civil and criminal sanctions. In addition,
failure to comply with laws and regulations, could lead to
disqualification of test data submitted in product applications.
If the FDA were to take such actions, the FDAs sanctions
would be available to the public. Such publicity could harm our
ability to sell these regulated products globally. In addition,
we may not be able to obtain regulatory clearance or approval
for our products in the United States
and/or may
incur significant costs in obtaining or maintaining such
regulatory clearances or approvals in the United States.
Additionally, any changes in FDA laws, regulations, and
interpretations could adversely affect us and our customers,
have an adverse impact on revenues, and result in government
sanctions.
Medical device laws and regulations are also in effect in many
countries, ranging from comprehensive device approval
requirements to requests for product data or certifications. The
number and scope of these requirements is increasing. We may not
be able to obtain regulatory approvals in such countries
and/or may
incur significant costs in obtaining or maintaining our foreign
regulatory approvals. In addition, our exports of certain of our
products which have not yet been cleared or approved for United
States commercial distribution may be subject to FDA or other
export restrictions.
Additionally, some of our customers use our products in the
manufacturing or testing processes for their drug and medical
device products, and such end-products or services may be
regulated by the FDA under Quality System Regulations or CMS
under CLIA88 regulations. The customer is ultimately
responsible for QSR, CLIA88 and other compliance
requirements for their products; however, we may agree to comply
with certain requirements, and, if we fail to do so, we could
lose sales and customers and be exposed to product liability
claims.
ISO 13485 is an internationally-recognized, voluntary quality
management system standard that may be used in the design,
development, production, and installation and servicing of
medical devices similar to the QSR requirements. Our facilities
in Benicia and Pleasanton, California; Frederick, Maryland;
Grand Island, New York; Brown Deer, Wisconsin; Warrington,
United Kingdom; Paisley, Scotland; Oslo, Norway; and Singapore
are each certified for compliance with ISO 13485. Failure to
comply with this standard can lead to observations of
non-compliance or even suspension of ISO certification or CE
mark certificates by the registrar. If we were to lose ISO
certification or CE mark certificates, some customers might
purchase products from other suppliers as a result.
If the Company violates a government-mandated or voluntary
quality program, we may incur additional expense to come back
into compliance with the government mandated or voluntary
standards. That expense may be material and we may not have
anticipated that expense in our financial forecasts. Our
financial results could suffer as a result of such increased
expenses.
Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the
life sciences industry to significant changes. We cannot predict
with certainty which initiatives affecting the life sciences
industry, if any, will be implemented at the state or federal
level, or what affect any future legislation, regulation or
governmental policy may have on the Company or our
customers purchasing decisions regarding our products and
services. However, the implementation of new legislation,
regulation and policies may adversely affect our business.
Products that are intended for the diagnosis or treatment of
disease are subject to government regulation. Our DNA sequencing
products are currently intended for research or investigational
uses. Research uses are not subject to FDA 510(k) clearance or
premarket approval or other regulatory requirements.
Investigational uses are not subject to FDA 510(k) clearance or
premarket approval or most regulatory requirements, but are
subject to limited regulatory controls for entities conducting
investigational studies.
As we continue to adapt parts of our product line to the field
of Molecular Medicine, including the diagnosis of disease,
certain of our products are likely to become subject to more
regulation by the FDA or comparable agencies of other countries,
including requirements for regulatory clearance or approval of
such products before they can be marketed. Such regulatory
clearance or approval processes may be expensive,
time-consuming, and uncertain, and
17
any failure by us to obtain, or continue to comply with
requirements relating to, such clearances and approvals could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating
results. In addition, changes to the current regulatory
framework, including the imposition of new regulations and
policy changes, could arise at any time and may negatively
affect our ability to obtain or maintain FDA or comparable
regulatory clearance or approval of our products, if required.
The
Company relies on other companies to manufacture some of our
products and supply certain components of the products we
manufacture on our own which may hinder our ability to satisfy
customer demand
Although the Company has contracts with most of its
manufacturers and suppliers, their operations could be
disrupted. These disruptions could be caused by conditions
unrelated to our business or operations, including a global
economic downturn. Although we have our own manufacturing
facilities, it could take considerable time and resources for us
replace the capacity of such vendors. In addition, for reasons
of quality assurance and/or cost effectiveness, we purchase
certain components and raw materials from sole suppliers. We may
not be able to establish additional or replacement sources for
certain components of materials. Accordingly, if these other
manufacturers or suppliers are unable or fail to fulfill their
obligations to us, we might not be able to satisfy customer
demand in a timely manner, and our business could be harmed.
Risks
Related to Our Operations
Loss of
key personnel may adversely affect our business
Our products and services are highly technical in nature. In
general, only highly qualified and trained scientists have the
necessary skills to develop and market our products and provide
our services. In addition, some of our manufacturing positions
are highly technical as well. We face intense competition for
these professionals from our competitors, customers, marketing
partners, and other companies throughout our industry. As is
customary in the United States, we do not generally enter into
employment agreements requiring these employees to continue in
our employment for any period of time. Any failure on our part
to hire, train, and retain a sufficient number of qualified
employees could seriously damage our business. Additionally,
integration of acquired companies and businesses can be
disruptive and may lead to the departure of key employees.
Further, we use stock options, restricted stock, and restricted
stock units/awards to provide incentives to these individuals to
remain with us and to build their long-term stockholder value to
align their interests with those of the Company. If our stock
price decreases, this reduces the value of these equity awards
and therefore a key employees incentive to stay. If we
were to lose a sufficient number of our key employees and were
unable to replace them, these losses could seriously damage our
business.
We have substantial indebtedness, which could adversely
affect our cash flows, business and financial condition
As of December 31, 2010, the carrying value of our
outstanding indebtedness was approximately
$3,075.4 million. As of December 31, 2010, we also had
availability of $486.1 million (net of standby letters of
credit of $13.9 million) under our revolving credit
facility.
Our substantial level of debt could, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to the servicing and repayment of our debt,
thereby reducing funds available for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions and other purposes;
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to, and limit our flexibility in
planning for, adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
|
adversely affect our credit rating, with the result that the
cost of new indebtedness might increase;
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future
working capital, capital expenditures, additional acquisitions
and other general corporate requirements;
|
|
|
create competitive disadvantages compared to other companies
with less indebtedness;
|
|
|
adversely affect our stock price;
|
|
|
limit our ability to apply proceeds from an offering, debt
incurrence or asset sale to purposes other than the servicing
and repayment of our debt; and
|
|
|
limit our ability to pay dividends and repurchase stock.
|
Our
credit facility contains restrictions that limit our flexibility
in operating our business
Our credit facility may contain various covenants that limit our
ability to engage in specified types of transactions. These
covenants may limit our and our subsidiaries ability to,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees or other
contingent obligations);
|
|
|
pay dividends on, repurchase, or make distributions in respect
to our common stock or make other restricted payments;
|
|
|
make specified investments (including loans and advances);
|
|
|
sell or transfer assets;
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of our assets; and
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.
|
In addition, under our credit facility, we are required to
satisfy and maintain specified financial ratios and other
financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial
ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control,
and we cannot be assured that we will meet those ratios and
tests. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a
default under our credit facility. Upon the occurrence of an
event of default under our credit facility, our lenders could
elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our credit
facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all
commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay
those amounts, the lenders under our credit facility could
proceed to collect against all United States subsidiaries, as
guarantors of the facility.
The Company could incur more indebtedness, which may increase
the risks associated with our substantial leverage, including
our ability to service our indebtedness and pay dividends on our
common stock
The indentures governing our convertible senior notes, senior
unsecured notes and our credit facility permit us, under some
circumstances, to incur certain amounts of additional
indebtedness. If we incur additional debt, the risks associated
with our leverage, including our ability to service our debt and
pay dividends on our common stock, would increase. This, in
turn, could negatively affect the market price of our common
stock.
The Company could lose the tax deduction for interest expense
associated with our convertible senior notes due in 2024 and the
convertible senior notes due in 2025
The Company could lose some or all of the tax deduction for
interest expense associated with our convertible senior notes
due in 2024 and the convertible senior notes due in 2025 if,
under certain circumstances, such notes are not subject to the
special Treasury Regulations governing contingent payment debt
instruments or the exchange of these notes were deemed to be a
taxable exchange. We also could lose the tax deduction for
interest expense associated with the foregoing notes if we were
to invest in non-taxable investments.
Our federal, state and local income tax returns may, from
time to time, be selected for audit by the taxing authorities or
affected by a change in interpretation of legislation, either of
which may result in tax assessments, penalties, or other
results
The Company is subject to federal, state and local taxes in the
United States and abroad. Significant judgment is required in
determining the provision for taxes. Although we believe our tax
estimates are reasonable, if the IRS or other taxing authority
disagrees with the positions taken by the Company on its tax
returns, we could incur additional tax liabilities, plus related
interest and penalties. If potential assessments differ
significantly from
19
previously recorded reserves, payment of such additional amounts
upon final adjudication of any disputes could have a material
impact on our results of operations and financial position.
In addition, United States federal, state and local, as
well as international, tax laws and regulations are extremely
complex and subject to varying interpretations, and a change in
interpretation could have a material impact on our results of
operations and financial position.
Tax
legislation initiatives could adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition
We are a large multinational corporation subject to the tax laws
and regulations of the United States federal, state and local
governments, and of many international jurisdictions. From time
to time, new tax legislation may be proposed, which could
adversely affect our current or future tax filings
and/or
negatively impact our effective tax rate and increase future tax
payments.
The Companys business, particularly the development and
marketing of information-based products and services, depends on
the continuous, effective, reliable, and secure operation of our
computer hardware, software, and Internet applications and
related tools and functions
The Companys business requires manipulating and analyzing
large amounts of data, and communicating the results of the
analysis to our internal research personnel and to our customers
via the Internet. In addition, we rely on a global enterprise
software system to operate and manage our business. Our business
therefore depends on the continuous, effective, reliable, and
secure operation of our computer hardware, software, networks,
Internet servers, and related infrastructure. To the extent that
our hardware or software malfunctions or access to our data by
internal research personnel or customers through the Internet is
interrupted, our business could suffer.
The Companys computer and communications hardware is
protected through physical and software safeguards. However, it
is still vulnerable to fire, storm, flood, power loss,
earthquakes, telecommunications failures, physical or software
break-ins, software viruses, and similar events. In addition,
our online products and services are complex and sophisticated,
and as such, could contain data, design, or software errors that
could be difficult to detect and correct. Software defects could
be found in current or future products. If we fail to maintain
and further develop the necessary computer capacity and data to
support our computational needs and our customers access
to information-based product and service offerings, we could
experience a loss of or delay in revenues or market acceptance.
In addition, any sustained disruption in internet access
provided by other companies could harm our business.
Business
disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and
financial condition and increase our costs and
expenses
The Companys worldwide operations could be subject to
earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water
shortages, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires,
extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics and other natural
or manmade disasters or business interruptions, for which we are
predominantly self-insured. The occurrence of any of these
business disruptions could seriously harm our revenue and
financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. Our
corporate headquarters, and a portion of our principal research
and development, manufacturing and administrative facilities,
are located in California, and other critical business
operations and some of our suppliers are located in California
and Asia, near major earthquake faults and fire zones. The
ultimate impact of being located near major earthquake faults,
fire zones and being consolidated in certain geographical areas
on us, our significant suppliers and our general infrastructure
is unknown, but our revenue, profitability and financial
condition could suffer in the event of a major earthquake, fire
or other natural disaster.
Risks
Related to Our International Operations
We are
subject to risks associated with doing business outside of the
United States
The Companys products are currently marketed in
approximately 160 countries throughout the world. Our
international revenues, which include revenues from our foreign
subsidiaries and export sales from the United States,
represented 60% of our product revenues in 2010, 61% of our
product revenues in 2009 and
20
56% of our product revenues in 2008. We expect that
international revenues will continue to account for a
significant percentage of our revenues for the foreseeable
future. There are a number of risks arising from our
international business, including those related to:
|
|
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, potentially
reducing the United States dollars we receive for sales
denominated in foreign currency;
|
|
|
the possibility that unfriendly nations or groups could boycott
our products;
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in the markets in
which we operate;
|
|
|
potential increased costs associated with overlapping tax
structures, including the tax costs associated with repatriating
cash;
|
|
|
possible failure to comply with anti-bribery laws such as the
United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar
anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions;
|
|
|
potential trade restrictions and exchange controls;
|
|
|
more limited protection for intellectual property rights in some
countries;
|
|
|
difficulties and costs associated with staffing and managing
foreign operations;
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
the difficulties of compliance with a wide variety of foreign
laws and regulations;
|
|
|
longer accounts receivable cycles in certain foreign countries,
whether due to cultural differences, exchange rate fluctuation
or other factors;
|
|
|
import and export licensing requirements; and
|
|
|
changes to our distribution networks.
|
A significant portion of the Companys revenues are
received in currencies other than the United States dollar,
which is our reporting currency. Most of our costs, however, are
incurred in United States dollars. While we have at times
attempted to hedge our net cash flows in currencies other than
the United States dollar, our hedging program relies in part on
forecasts of these cash flows. As a result, we cannot guarantee
this program will adequately protect our cash flows from the
full risks and effects of exchange rate fluctuations. We also
continually evaluate the costs and benefits of our hedging
program and cannot guarantee that we will continue to conduct
hedging activities. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates
for the currencies in which we do business have caused, and will
continue to cause, fluctuations in the United States dollar
value of our financial results. We cannot predict the effects of
currency exchange rate fluctuations upon our future financial
results because of the number of currencies involved, the
variability of currency exposures and the volatility of currency
exchange rates.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property
The Company may not be able to effectively and efficiently
protect and enforce our proprietary technology
The Companys success depends to a significant degree upon
our ability to develop proprietary products and technologies.
When we develop such technologies, we routinely seek patent
protection in the United States and abroad to the extent
permitted by law. However, the intellectual property rights of
biotechnology companies, including us, involve complex factual,
scientific, and legal questions. We cannot assure that patents
will be granted on any of our patent applications or that the
scope of any of our issued patents will be sufficiently broad to
offer meaningful protection. Even if we receive a patent that we
believe is valid for a particular technology, we may not be able
to realize the expected value to us from that technology due to
several factors, including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Although we have licensing programs to provide industry access
to some of our patent rights, some other companies have in the
past refused to participate in these licensing programs and some
companies may refuse to participate in them in the future. In
addition, our licenses typically provide our customers with
access for limited use of our technology, such as for certain
fields of use or to provide certain kinds of products and
services. The validity of the restrictions contained in these
licenses could be contested, and we cannot provide assurances
that we would either be aware of an unauthorized use or be able
to enforce the restrictions in a cost-effective manner;
|
|
|
Legal actions to enforce patent rights can be expensive and may
involve the diversion of significant management time. Our
enforcement actions may not be successful, and furthermore they
could give risk to
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
legal claims against us and could result in the invalidation of
some of our intellectual property rights or legal determinations
that they are not enforceable;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company only seeks to have patents issued in selected
countries. Third-parties can make, use and sell products covered
by our patents in any country in which we do not seek patent
protection, unless such activity is covered by our other
intellectual property;
|
|
|
The Companys issued patents or patents we exclusively
license from others could be successfully challenged through
legal actions or other proceedings, such as by challenging the
validity and scope of a patent with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office, or USPTO, foreign patent offices, Federal
Courts, or the International Trade Commission. These actions or
proceedings could result in amendments to or rejection of
certain patent claims; and
|
|
|
Judicial decisions in third-party litigation and legislative
changes could harm the value of our patents, or could impact our
exclusive licenses or the effectiveness of our label licenses
associated with our products.
|
The Company is currently, and could in the future be, subject
to lawsuits, arbitrations, investigations, and other legal
actions with private parties and governmental entities,
particularly involving claims for infringement of patents and
other intellectual property rights, and we may need to obtain
licenses to intellectual property from others
Our products are based on complex, rapidly developing
technologies. These products could be developed without
knowledge of previously filed patent applications that mature
into patents that cover some aspect of these technologies. In
addition, we may seek to protect and commercialize a technology
even though we are aware that patents have been applied for and,
in some cases, issued to others claiming technologies that are
closely related to ours. Because patent litigation is complex
and the outcome inherently uncertain, our belief that our
products do not infringe valid and enforceable patents owned by
others could be successfully challenged. We have from time to
time been notified that we may be infringing on the patents and
other intellectual property rights of others. In addition, in
the course of our business, we may from time to time have access
to confidential or proprietary information of others, and they
could bring a claim against us asserting that we had
misappropriated their technologies, which, though not patented,
are protected as trade secrets, and had improperly incorporated
those technologies into our products. The outcome of legal
actions is inherently uncertain, and we cannot be sure that we
will prevail in any of these actions. An adverse determination
in some of our current legal actions could harm our business and
financial condition.
Due to these factors, litigation regarding patents and other
intellectual property rights is extensive in the biotechnology
industry, and there remains a constant risk of intellectual
property litigation and other legal actions affecting us, which
could include antitrust claims. From time to time, we have been
made a party to litigation and have been subject to other legal
actions regarding intellectual property matters, which have
included claims of violations of antitrust laws. Some of these
actions, if determined adversely, could harm our business and
financial condition. To avoid or settle legal claims, it may be
necessary or desirable in the future to obtain licenses relating
to one or more products or relating to current or future
technologies. We may not be able to obtain these licenses or
other rights on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and
there is a risk that we may need to discontinue an important
product or product line or alter our products and processes. In
some situations, settlement of claims may require an agreement
to cease allegedly infringing activities.
The Company is involved in several legal actions that could
affect our intellectual property rights and our products and
services. The cost of litigation and the amount of management
time associated with these cases has been, and is expected to
continue to be, significant. These matters might not be resolved
favorably. If they are not resolved favorably, we could be
enjoined from selling the products or services in question or
other, related products or services, and monetary or other
damages could be assessed against us. The damages assessed
against us could include damages for past infringement, which,
in some cases, can be trebled by the court. Such possible
outcomes could harm our business or financial condition.
Disclosure
of trade secrets could cause harm to our business
The Company attempts to protect our trade secrets by, among
other things, entering into confidentiality agreements with
third-parties, our employees, and our consultants. However,
these agreements can be breached and,
22
if they are, there may not be an adequate remedy available to
us. If our trade secrets become publicly known, we may lose our
competitive position.
Some of the intellectual property that is important to our
business is owned by other companies or institutions and
licensed to us, and legal actions against them could harm our
business
Even if we are not a party to these legal actions, an adverse
outcome could harm our business because it might prevent these
other companies or institutions from continuing to license
intellectual property that we may need for our business.
Furthermore, an adverse outcome could result in infringement or
other legal actions being brought directly against us.
Risks
Related to Environmental, Product Liability and Litigation
Issues
Risks related to handling of hazardous materials and other
regulations governing environmental and workplace safety
The Companys research and development and manufacturing
activities involve the use of potentially hazardous materials,
including biological materials, chemicals, and various
radioactive compounds. In addition, some of our products are
hazardous materials or include hazardous materials. Our
operations also involve the generation, transportation and
storage of waste. These activities are subject to complex and
stringent federal, state, local, and foreign environmental,
health, safety and other governmental laws, regulations, and
permits governing the use, storage, handling, transport, and
disposal of hazardous materials and specified waste products, as
well as the shipment and labeling of materials and products
containing hazardous materials. Public officials and private
individuals or organizations may seek to enforce these legal
requirements against us. While we believe we are in material
compliance with these laws, regulations, and permits, we could
discover that we are not in material compliance. Under some laws
and regulations, a party can be subject to strict
liability for damages caused by some hazardous materials,
which means that a party can be liable without regard to fault
or negligence. Existing laws and regulations may also be revised
or reinterpreted, or new laws and regulations may become
applicable to us, whether retroactively or prospectively, that
may have a negative effect on our business and results of
operations. It is therefore impossible to eliminate completely
the risk of contamination or injury from the hazardous and other
materials that we use in our business and products. If we fail
to comply with any of these laws, regulations, or permits, or if
we are held strictly liable under any of these laws,
regulations, or permits despite our compliance, we could be
subject to substantial fines or penalties, payment of
remediation costs, loss of permits, embargos,
and/or other
adverse governmental action, and we could be liable for
substantial damages. Any of these events could harm our business
and financial condition.
In acquiring Dexter Corporation in 2000, we assumed certain of
Dexter Corporations environmental liabilities, including
clean-up of
formerly-owned locations as well as several hazardous waste
sites under state and federal environmental laws. We also
assumed certain Applied Biosystems environmental liabilities,
including
clean-up of
formerly-owned locations as well as hazardous waste sites under
state and federal environmental laws, in connection with our
acquisition of Applied Biosystems in 2008. Unexpected results
related to the investigation and
clean-up of
any of these sites could cause our financial exposure in these
matters to exceed stated reserves and insurance, requiring us to
allocate additional funds and other resources to address our
environmental liabilities, which could cause a material adverse
effect on our business.
Potential
product liability and other litigation claims could cause harm
to our business
We face a potential risk of liability claims based on our
products or services. We carry product liability insurance
coverage, which is limited in scope and amount. We cannot
assure, however, that we will be able to maintain this insurance
at a reasonable cost and on reasonable terms. We also cannot
assure that this insurance will be adequate to protect us
against a product liability claim, should one arise.
Some of our services include the manufacture of biologic
products to be tested in human clinical trials. We could be held
liable for errors and omissions in connection with these
services, even though we are not the party performing the
clinical trials. In addition, we formulate, test and manufacture
products intended for use by the public. These activities could
expose us to risk of liability for personal injury or death to
persons using such
23
products. We seek to reduce our potential liability through
measures such as contractual indemnification provisions with
clients (the scope of which may vary from
client-to-client
and the performances of which are not secured), insurance
maintained by clients and conducting certain of these businesses
through subsidiaries. Nonetheless, we could be materially harmed
if we were required to pay damages or incur defense costs in
connection with a claim that is outside the scope of the
indemnification agreements, if the indemnity, although
applicable, is not performed in accordance with its terms or if
our liability exceeds the amount of applicable insurance or
indemnity. In addition, we could be held liable for errors and
omissions in connection with the services we perform. We
currently maintain product liability and errors and omissions
insurance with respect to these risks. There can be no assurance
that our insurance coverage will be adequate or that insurance
coverage will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us.
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings. Legal
proceedings are inherently unpredictable, and the outcome can
result in excessive verdicts and/or injunctive relief that may
affect how we operate our business, or we may enter into
settlements of claims for monetary damages that exceed our
insurance coverage, if any. Future court decisions and
legislative activity may increase our exposure to litigation and
regulatory investigations. In some cases, substantial
non-economic remedies or punitive damages may be sought.
Risks
Related to the Market for Our Securities
Operating
results and the market price of our stock, convertible senior
notes and senior unsecured notes could be volatile
Our operating results and the price of our stock, convertible
senior notes and senior unsecured notes have been in the past,
and will continue to be, subject to fluctuations as a result of
a number of factors, including those listed in this section of
this Annual Report and those we have failed to foresee. Our
stock price and the price of our convertible senior notes and
senior unsecured notes could also be affected by any of the
following: inability to meet analysts expectations;
general fluctuations in the stock market, or fluctuations in the
stock prices of companies in our industry or those of our
customers; conditions and publicity regarding the genomics,
biotechnology, pharmaceutical, or life sciences industries
generally, including, for example, comments by securities
analysts or public officials regarding such matters. Such
volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of
many companies securities for reasons unrelated to their
operating performance and, in the past, has led to securities
class action litigation. Securities litigation against us could
result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
managements attention and resources, which could have an
adverse effect on our business.
Our stock
price may fluctuate
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate due to a
number of factors, some of which may be beyond our control,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimated by securities analysts or our
ability to meet those estimates;
|
|
|
the operating and stock price performance of comparable
companies; and
|
|
|
domestic and foreign economic conditions.
|
Certain provisions in our restated certificate of
incorporation and sixth amended and restated bylaws, and of
Delaware law, may prevent or delay an acquisition of our
company, which could decrease the trading price of our common
stock
Our restated certificate of incorporation, our sixth amended and
restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that are
intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate
takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably
expensive to the raider and to encourage prospective acquirers
to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt
a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability of our stockholders to call a special meeting;
|
|
|
rules regarding how stockholders may present proposals or
nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings;
|
|
|
the right of our board to issue preferred stock without
stockholder approval;
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
a provision that stockholders may only remove directors with
cause prior to the expiration of the applicable directors
term; and
|
|
|
the ability of our directors, and not stockholders, to fill
vacancies on our board of directors.
|
Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other
business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more
of our outstanding common stock.
We believe these provisions will protect our stockholders from
coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring
potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors and
by providing our board of directors with more time to assess any
acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make
our company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions
will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by
some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that
our board of directors determines is not in the best interests
of our company and our stockholders. These provisions may also
prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent
directors.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
We own or lease approximately 4,000,000 square feet of
property being used in current operations at the following
principal locations within the United States, each of which
contains office, manufacturing, storage
and/or
laboratory facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Carlsbad, California (owned (land only) and leased)
|
|
|
Frederick, Maryland (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Grand Island, New York (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Madison, Wisconsin (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Brown Deer, Wisconsin (leased)
|
|
|
Eugene, Oregon (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Camarillo, California (leased)
|
|
|
Foster City, California (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Pleasanton, California (owned)
|
|
|
South San Francisco, California (leased)
|
|
|
Benicia, California (leased)
|
|
|
Norwalk, Connecticut (leased)
|
|
|
Washington, District of Columbia (leased)
|
|
|
Bedford, Massachusetts (leased)
|
|
|
Beverly, Massachusetts (leased)
|
|
|
Framingham, Massachusetts (leased)
|
|
|
Woburn, Massachusetts (leased)
|
|
|
Durham, North Carolina (leased)
|
|
|
Austin, Texas (leased)
|
|
|
Grand Prairie, Texas (leased)
|
In addition, we own or lease approximately 1,500,000 square
feet of property at locations outside the United States
including these principal locations, each of which also contains
office, manufacturing, storage
and/or
laboratory facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Paisley, Scotland (leased)
|
|
|
Oslo, Norway (owned (land only) and leased)
|
|
|
Auckland, Christchurch and Nelson, New Zealand (owned)
|
|
|
Shanghai and Beijing, China (leased)
|
|
|
Melbourne and Newcastle, Australia (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Darmstadt, Germany (leased)
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
Warrington, United Kingdom (owned and leased)
|
|
|
Bleiswijk, Netherlands (leased)
|
|
|
Singapore (leased)
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan (leased)
|
|
|
Bangalore, India (leased)
|
In addition to the principal properties listed above, we lease
other properties in locations throughout the world, including
India, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea,
Thailand, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Canada, Israel,
Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the
Netherlands, Russia, South Africa, Spain and Sweden. Many of our
plants have been constructed, renovated or expanded during the
past ten years. We are currently using substantially all of our
finished space, with some space available for expansion at some
of our locations. We consider the facilities to be in a
condition suitable for their current uses. Because of
anticipated growth in the business and due to the increasing
requirements of customers or regulatory agencies, we may need to
acquire additional space or upgrade and enhance existing space
during the next five years. We believe that adequate facilities
will be available upon the conclusion of our leases.
We also have leases in Branford, Connecticut; Bethesda,
Maryland; and San Carlos, California that are subleased or
are being offered for sublease. These properties are not used in
current operations and therefore are not included in the
discussion above.
Most of our products and services are manufactured or provided
from our facilities in Austin, Texas; Bedford, Massachusetts;
Carlsbad, Foster City and Pleasanton, California; Eugene,
Oregon; Frederick, Maryland; Grand Island, New York; Madison,
Wisconsin; Auckland, New Zealand; Oslo, Norway; Paisley,
Scotland; and Warrington, United Kingdom. We also have
manufacturing facilities in Japan, Israel and Singapore.
Additional information regarding our properties is contained in
Notes 1 and 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to potential liabilities under government
regulations and various claims and legal actions that are
pending or may be asserted. These matters arise in the ordinary
course and conduct of our business, and, at times, as a result
of our acquisitions and dispositions. They include, for example,
commercial, intellectual property, environmental, securities,
and employment matters. Some are expected to be covered, at
least partly, by insurance. We intend to continue to defend
ourselves vigorously in such matters. We regularly assess
contingencies to determine the degree of probability and range
of possible loss for potential accrual in our financial
statements. An estimated loss contingency is accrued in our
financial statements if it is probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Based on our assessment, we currently have accrued an immaterial
amount in our financial statements for contingent liabilities
associated with these legal actions and claims. Litigation is
inherently unpredictable, and unfavorable resolutions could
occur. As a result, assessing contingencies is highly subjective
and requires judgment about future events. The amount of
ultimate loss may exceed our current accruals, and it is
possible that our cash flows or results of operations could be
materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable
resolution of one or more of these contingencies.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
26
PART II
ITEM 5. Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market
and Stockholder Information
The Companys common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global
Select
Market®
under the symbol LIFE. The table below provides the
high and low sales prices of our common stock for the periods
indicated, as reported by The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
56.78
|
|
|
$
|
45.19
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
48.67
|
|
|
|
41.10
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
56.19
|
|
|
|
46.63
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
54.06
|
|
|
|
46.32
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
52.70
|
|
|
$
|
45.30
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
48.46
|
|
|
|
39.49
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
41.92
|
|
|
|
30.50
|
|
First quarter
|
|
|
33.33
|
|
|
|
22.99
|
|
On February 23, 2011, the last reported sale price of our
common stock was $53.90. As of February 23, 2011, there
were approximately 4,445 stockholders of record of our common
stock. The approximate number of holders is based upon the
actual number of holders registered in our records at such date
and excludes holders of shares in street name or
persons, partnerships, associations, corporations, or other
entities identified in security positions listings maintained by
depository trust companies. The calculations of the market value
of shares of Life Technologies stock held by non-affiliates as
of June 30, 2010, shown on the cover of this report, was
made on the assumption that there were no affiliates other than
executive officers and directors as of the date of calculation.
27
Price
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing the total return on an
indexed basis of a $100 investment in the Companys common
stock, the NASDAQ
Composite®
(US) Index and the NASDAQ BioPharmaceutical Index. The
measurement points utilized in the graph consist of the last
trading day in each calendar year, which closely approximates
the last day of the respective fiscal year of the Company.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and currently do not anticipate paying such cash
dividends. We currently anticipate that we will retain all of
our future earnings for use in the development and expansion of
our business, debt repayment and general corporate purposes. Any
determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our
results of operations, financial condition, tax laws and other
factors as the Board of Directors, in its discretion, deems
relevant.
Securities
Purchased Under Life Technologies Stock Repurchase
Programs
In December 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
a program (the December 2010 program), authorizing management to
repurchase up to $500.0 million of common stock. As of
December 31, 2010, no shares were repurchased under the
December 2010 program.
In July 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
program (the July 2010 program) authorizing management to
repurchase up to $520.0 million of common stock over the
next two years. During the year ended
28
December 31, 2010, the Company repurchased 8.4 million
shares at a total cost of $436.6 million under the July
2010 program. The cost of repurchased shares is included in
treasury stock and reported as a reduction in total equity when
a repurchase occurs.
In July 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
program (the July 2007 program) authorizing management to
repurchase up to $500.0 million of common stock, of which
$265.0 million was not used to repurchase shares. This
program expired in July 2010. No shares were repurchased under
this program in 2009 and 2010. The cost of repurchased shares
were included in treasury stock and reported as a reduction in
total equity.
The following table represents stock repurchases under the July
2010 program during the fourth quarter of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dollar
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Units)
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
(or Units)
|
|
|
Paid per
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
purchased
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
October 1 October 31
|
|
|
2,710,175
|
|
|
$
|
47.15
|
|
|
$
|
127,780,308
|
|
|
$
|
392,219,692
|
|
November 1 November 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,219,692
|
|
December 1 December 31
|
|
|
5,732,043
|
|
|
|
53.88
|
|
|
|
308,849,831
|
|
|
|
83,369,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,442,218
|
|
|
$
|
51.72
|
|
|
$
|
436,630,139
|
|
|
$
|
83,369,861
|
|
29
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following selected data should be read in conjunction
with our financial statements located elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
and Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
FIVE YEAR
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010(1)
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
2008(1,2)
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,588,094
|
|
|
$
|
3,280,344
|
|
|
$
|
1,620,323
|
|
|
$
|
1,281,747
|
|
|
$
|
1,151,175
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,106,141
|
|
|
|
1,824,725
|
|
|
|
940,752
|
|
|
|
715,887
|
|
|
|
608,331
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
377,858
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
106,238
|
|
|
|
53,188
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
12,911
|
|
|
|
(266,808
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
377,858
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
119,149
|
|
|
|
(213,620
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
|
378,295
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
119,149
|
|
|
|
(213,620
|
)
|
Earnings from continuing operations per common share
attributable to Life Technologies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations per common share
attributable to Life Technologies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
(2.60
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
(2.52
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Life Technologies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
(2.01
|
)
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,046,525
|
|
|
$
|
1,796,164
|
|
|
$
|
1,612,171
|
|
|
$
|
1,090,484
|
|
|
$
|
740,604
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
7,439,674
|
|
|
|
7,319,576
|
|
|
|
7,286,588
|
|
|
|
2,225,966
|
|
|
|
2,168,212
|
|
Current liabilities (including convertible debt)
|
|
|
1,146,385
|
|
|
|
1,385,723
|
|
|
|
1,007,242
|
|
|
|
234,413
|
|
|
|
228,086
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities (including convertible debt)
|
|
|
3,901,785
|
|
|
|
3,703,349
|
|
|
|
4,434,979
|
|
|
|
1,232,406
|
|
|
|
1,178,988
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
4,438,029
|
|
|
|
4,026,668
|
|
|
|
3,456,538
|
|
|
|
1,847,125
|
|
|
|
1,736,146
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 the Company completed
acquisitions that were not material and their results of
operations have been included in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition.
For more information on our business combinations accounting,
see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(2) |
|
2008 includes the results of operations of Applied Biosystems,
Inc. from November 21, 2008, the date of acquisition, and
the one-time purchase accounting charges associated with the
merger such as in-process research and development, which
affects the comparability of the Selected Financial Data. |
30
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
OVERVIEW
The Company is a global life sciences company dedicated to
improving the human condition. Our systems, reagents, and
services enable scientific researchers to accelerate scientific
exploration, driving to discoveries and developments that make
life better. Life Technologies customers do their work across
the biological spectrum, working to advance genomic medicine,
regenerative science, molecular diagnostics, agricultural and
environmental research, and
21st century
forensics. In 2010, the Company had sales of approximately
$3.6 billion, had a workforce of approximately
11,000 people, had a presence in more than 160 countries,
and possessed a rapidly-growing intellectual property estate of
over 4,000 patents and exclusive licenses.
The Companys systems and reagents enable, simplify and
improve a broad spectrum of biological research of genes,
proteins and cells within academic and life science research and
commercial applications. Our scientific know-how is making
biodiscovery research techniques more effective and efficient to
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, agricultural, government and
academic researchers with backgrounds in a wide range of
scientific disciplines.
The Company offers many different products and services, and is
continually developing
and/or
acquiring others. Some of our specific product categories
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Capillary electrophoresis,
SOLiDtm,
and Ion
Torrenttm
DNA sequencing systems and reagents, which are used to discover
sources of genetic and epigenetic variation, to catalog the DNA
structure of organisms de novo, to verify the composition
of genetic research material, and to apply these genetic
analysis discoveries in markets such as forensic human
identification.
|
|
|
High-throughput gene cloning and expression
technology, which allows customers to clone and expression-test
genes on an industrial scale.
|
|
|
Pre-cast electrophoresis products, which improve the speed,
reliability and convenience of separating nucleic acids and
proteins.
|
|
|
Antibodies, which allow researchers to capture and label
proteins, visualize their location through use of Molecular
Probes dyes and discern their role in disease.
|
|
|
Magnetic beads, which are used in a variety of settings, such as
attachment of molecular labels, nucleic acid purification, and
organ and bone marrow tissue type testing.
|
|
|
Molecular Probes fluorescence-based technologies, which
facilitate the labeling of molecules for biological research and
drug discovery.
|
|
|
Transfection reagents, which are widely used to transfer genetic
elements into living cells enabling the study of protein
function and gene regulation.
|
|
|
PCR and Real Time PCR systems and reagents, which enable
researchers to amplify and detect targeted nucleic acids (DNA
and RNA molecules) for a host of applications in molecular
biology.
|
|
|
Cell culture media and reagents used to preserve and grow
mammalian cells, which are used in large scale cGMP
bio-production facilities to produce large molecule biologic
therapies.
|
|
|
RNA Interference reagents, which enable scientists to
selectively turn off genes in biology systems to
gain insight into biological pathways.
|
The Company aligns our products and services into the following
three divisions: Molecular Biology Systems (MBS), Genetic
Systems (GS) and Cell Systems (CS). The Company also had a joint
venture, Mass Spectometry, which the Company divested on
January 29, 2010. The MBS division includes the molecular
biology based technologies including basic and real-time PCR,
RNAi, DNA synthesis, thermo-cycler instrumentation, cloning and
protein expression profiling and protein analysis. The CS
division includes all product lines used in the study of cell
function, including cell culture media and sera, stem cells and
related tools, cellular imaging products, antibodies, drug
discovery services, and cell therapy related products. The GS
division includes sequencing systems and reagents, including
capillary electrophoresis, the
SOLiDtm
system, and Ion
Torrenttm
sequencing systems, as well as reagent kits developed
specifically for applied markets, such as forensics, food safety
and pharmaceutical quality monitoring.
31
The principal arenas for our products include the life sciences
research industry and the biopharmaceutical production industry.
We divide our principal customer base into three principal
categories:
Life science researchers. The life sciences research
market consists of laboratories generally associated with
universities, medical research centers, government institutions
(such as the United States National Institutes of Health, or the
NIH), and other research institutions as well as biotechnology,
pharmaceutical, diagnostic, energy, agricultural, and chemical
companies. Researchers at these institutions are using our
products and services in a broad spectrum of scientific
activities, such as searching for pharmaceutical or other
techniques to combat a wide variety of diseases (namely, cancer
and viral and bacterial diseases); researching diagnostics for
disease identification or for improving the efficacy of drugs to
targeted patient groups; and assisting in vaccine design,
bioproduction, and agriculture. Our products and services
provide the research tools needed for genomics studies,
proteomics studies, gene splicing, cellular analysis, and other
key research applications that are required by these life
science researchers. In addition, our research tools are
important in the development of diagnostics for disease
determination as well as identification of patients for more
targeted therapy.
Commercial producers of biopharmaceutical and other high
valued proteins. The Company serves industries that apply
genetic engineering to the research and commercial production of
useful but otherwise rare or difficult to obtain substances,
such as proteins, interferons, interleukins, t-PA and monoclonal
antibodies. Once a discovery has been proven, the manufacturers
of these materials require larger quantities of the same sera
and other cell growth media that the Company provides in smaller
quantities to researchers. Industries involved in the commercial
production of genetically engineered products include the
biotechnology pharmaceutical, food processing and agricultural
industries.
Users who apply our technologies to enable or improve
particular activities. We provide tools that apply our
technology to enable or improve activities in particular
markets, which we refer to as applied markets. The
current focus of our products for these industries is in the
areas of: forensic analysis, which is used to identify
individuals based on their DNA; quality and safety testing, such
as testing required to measure food, beverage, or environmental
quality, and pharmaceutical manufacturing quality and safety;
and biosecurity, which refers to products needed in response to
the threat of biological terrorism and other malicious,
accidental, and natural biological dangers. The Applied
Biosystems branded forensic testing and human identification
products and services are innovative and market-leading tools
that have been widely accepted by investigators and laboratories
in connection with criminal investigations, the exoneration of
individuals wrongly accused or convicted of crimes, identifying
victims of disasters, and paternity testing.
Our
Strategy
Our objective is to provide essential life science technologies
for basic research, drug discovery, and development of
diagnostic and commercial applications.
Our strategies to achieve this objective include:
Ø New
Product Innovation and Development
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Developing innovative new products. We place a great
emphasis on internally developing new technologies for life
sciences research. Additionally, we are looking to utilize the
broad range of our technologies to create unique customer
application-based solutions. A significant portion of our growth
and current revenue base has been created by the application of
technology to accelerate our customers research process,
and to various standardized testing environments such as human
identification.
|
|
|
Ø
|
In-licensing technologies. We actively and selectively
in-license new technologies which we modify to create high value
kits, many of which address bottlenecks in the research or drug
discovery laboratories. We have a dedicated group of individuals
that focus on in-licensing technologies from academic and
government institutions, as well as biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Acquisitions. We actively and selectively seek to acquire
and integrate companies with complementary products and
technologies, trusted brand names, strong market positions and
strong intellectual property positions. We have made numerous
acquisitions since becoming a public company in 1999. On
October 1,
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
2010, the Company acquired Ion Torrent, a business that has
developed a new method for DNA sequencing through the use of
semiconductor technology, resulting in a sequencing system that
is simpler, faster, less expensive and more scalable than other
sequencing technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Divestitures. In January 2010, the Company completed the
sale of its 50% ownership stake in the Applied Biosystems/MDS
Analytical Technologies Instruments joint venture and selected
assets and liabilities directly attributable to the joint
venture to Danaher Corporation for $428.1 million in cash,
excluding tax obligations and related transaction costs. The
company recorded a gain of $37.3 million in 2010 related to
the divestiture. The transaction allows the Company to focus on
its core competencies for biological solutions in life science
research, genomic medicine, molecular diagnostics and applied
markets. The Company acquired the joint venture as a part of the
merger with AB in November 2008.
|
Ø Utilize
Existing Sales, Distribution and Manufacturing
Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Multi-national sales footprint. We have developed a broad
sales and distribution network with a sales presence in more
than 160 countries. Our sales force is highly trained, with many
of our sales people possessing degrees in molecular biology,
biochemistry or related fields. We believe our sales force has a
proven track record in successfully marketing our products
across the globe and we expect to leverage this capacity to
increase sales of our existing, newly developed and acquired
products. In addition, to drive additional efficiency for the
Company and its customers, Life Technologies has a significant
and growing
e-commerce
platform.
|
|
|
Ø
|
High degree of customer satisfaction. Our sales,
marketing, customer service and technical support staff provide
our customers exceptional service and have been highly rated in
customer satisfaction surveys. We use this strength to attract
new customers and maintain existing customers.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Rapid product delivery. We have the ability to ship
typical consumable orders on a
same-day or
next-day
basis. We use this ability to provide convenient service to our
customers and to generate additional product revenues.
|
Ø Invest
in High Growth Industries
We will focus our investments and resources in segments that
provide high growth opportunities, particularly in four areas:
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Next Generation DNA Sequencing. Our Ion
Torrenttm
and
SOLiDtm
technology systems represent the latest innovations in next
generation sequencing, a method of sequencing the genome at high
throughput and relatively low cost. We will continue to invest
in cutting-edge technology, customer collaborations, and sales
force expertise to remain a leader in this important area of
research. We will also continue to invest in future sequencing
technologies that will allow for more rapid and lower cost
sequencing. Robust sequencing capabilities are critical to the
advancement of genomic medicine, as the treatment of disease
shifts to therapies that are specific to an individuals
unique genetic makeup.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Emerging Geographies. We continue to focus and invest in
high-growth geographic segments such as China, India and Brazil,
with direct sales and marketing personnel, as well as
manufacturing and distribution facilities. We will further
optimize our presence in these areas by enhancing relationships
with key government and academic institutions and local
companies.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Regenerative Medicine. We are the premier provider of
biological products and services for advancing the field of
regenerative medicine. We will continue to invest in
supplementing our comprehensive suite of product offerings,
including animal origin free reagents for stem cell research,
and unique primary and stem cells for drug discovery screening.
Today, our products enable cutting-edge tissue-engineered
transplants and research into innovative cell therapy efforts.
With the most comprehensive suite of products and services for
advancing stem cell research and cell therapy, we partner with
our customers to push the boundaries of regenerative science and
medicine.
|
33
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
Applied Markets. We will leverage the growing trend of
applying biology based approaches to segments beyond basic life
science research. We have a strong presence in these arenas and
we will continue to invest time and resources to further add to
our product portfolio and customer contacts in many applied
markets, including, but not limited to, forensics, food safety
and animal health testing, agbio, animal health, and human
diagnostics.
|
The Company anticipates that our results of operations may
fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis and potentially will
be difficult to predict. The timing and degree of fluctuation
will depend upon several factors, including those discussed
under our Risk Factors.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Increase
|
|
|
% Increase
|
|
|
Molecular Biology Systems revenues
|
|
$
|
1,725.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,633.3
|
|
|
$
|
92.5
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Cell Systems revenues
|
|
|
903.7
|
|
|
|
802.9
|
|
|
|
100.8
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Genetic Systems revenues
|
|
|
946.1
|
|
|
|
856.2
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Corporate and other revenues
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
3,588.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,280.3
|
|
|
$
|
307.8
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin
|
|
$
|
2,106.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,824.7
|
|
|
$
|
281.4
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Total gross margin %
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
The Companys revenues increased by $307.8 million or
9% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in revenue was
primarily driven by increases of $219.5 million related to
volume and pricing, $44.3 million in favorable foreign
currency impacts including hedging, $33.8 million
associated with acquisitions, and a decrease of
$16.1 million in amortization of purchase accounting
deferred revenue, partially offset by $11.8 million from
the divestiture of a product line.
The Company operates our business under three
divisionsMolecular Biology Systems, Cell Systems, and
Genetic Systems. The Molecular Biology Systems (MBS) division
includes the molecular biology based technologies including
basic and real-time PCR, RNAi, DNA synthesis, thermo-cycler
instrumentation, cloning and protein expression profiling and
protein analysis. Revenue in this division increased by
$92.5 million or 6% in 2010 compared to 2009. This increase
was driven primarily by $40.8 million in increased volume
and pricing, $31.6 million associated with acquisitions,
and $20.1 million in favorable currency impacts including
hedging. The Cell Systems (CS) division includes all product
lines used in the study of cell function, including cell culture
media and sera, stem cells and related tools, cellular imaging
products, antibodies, drug discovery services, and cell therapy
related products. Revenue in this division increased
$100.8 million or 13% for 2010 compared to 2009. This
increase was driven primarily by $91.2 million in increased
volume and pricing and by $9.5 million in favorable foreign
currency impacts including hedging. The Genetic System (GS)
division includes sequencing systems and reagents, including
capillary electrophoresis, Ion
Torrenttm
and the
SOLiDtm
sequencing systems, as well as reagent kits developed
specifically for applied markets, such as forensics and food
safety and animal health. Revenue in this division increased by
$89.9 million or 10% for 2010 compared to 2009. This
increase was driven primarily by $84.6 million in increased
volume and pricing, $14.6 million in favorable currency
impacts including hedging, and $2.2 million associated with
acquisitions, partially offset by $11.8 million from the
divestiture of a product line.
Changes in exchange rates of foreign currencies, especially the
Japanese yen, the British pound sterling, the euro and the
Canadian dollar, can significantly increase or decrease our
reported revenue on sales made in these currencies and could
result in a material positive or negative impact on our reported
results. In addition to currency exchange rates, we expect that
future revenues will be affected by, among other things, new
product introductions, competitive conditions, customer research
budgets, government research funding, the rate of expansion of
our customer base, price increases, product discontinuations and
acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or product lines.
34
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased by $281.4 million or 15% in 2010
compared to 2009. The increase in gross profit was primarily
driven by a $165.2 million increase in volume and pricing,
a $59.8 million decrease in acquired inventory fair market
value adjustments, $34.1 million in favorable foreign
currency impacts, a $16.1 million decrease in the
amortization of purchased deferred revenue, a $10.6 million
net increase associated with acquisitions and a divestiture, and
$6.2 million in increased royalty revenue, offset primarily
by an increase of $11.2 million in purchased intangible
amortization. The $59.8 million and $16.1 million
decreases in acquired inventory fair market value adjustments
and the amortization of purchased deferred revenue,
respectively, were primarily driven by recording the impact of
these items in 2009 as a result of the AB acquisition. In
accordance with business combination accounting guidance, the
acquired deferred revenue and inventory is adjusted to fair
value and the Company amortizes this fair value adjustment into
income in line with the underlying acquired assets and
liabilities.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a
|
|
|
|
As a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
of
|
|
Operating
|
|
of
|
|
$ Increase
|
|
% Increase
|
(in millions)
|
|
Expense
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Expense
|
|
Revenues
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
1,023.2
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
$
|
987.1
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
375.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
337.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Business consolidation costs
|
|
|
93.5
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
112.9
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by $36.1 million or 4% compared to the
year ended December 31, 2009. This increase was driven
primarily by a $30.1 million increase in compensation,
bonuses and benefits, a $14.3 million increase in
depreciation and amortization, $9.5 million due to
accelerated compensation expense related to a business
acquisition, and $6.4 million in unfavorable foreign
currency impacts, partially offset by a decrease of
$26.4 million in purchased services.
Research and Development. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, research and development expenses
increased by $38.4 million or 11% compared to the year
ended December 31, 2009. This increase was driven primarily
by an $11.4 million increase in compensation, bonuses and
benefits, $9.4 million due to accelerated compensation
expense related to a business acquisition, and a
$12.2 million increase in facilities, general overhead and
infrastructure costs. As a percentage of revenues, the costs are
comparable period over period.
Business Consolidation Costs. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, business consolidation costs were
$93.5 million, compared to $112.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, and represent costs to integrate
recent and pending acquisitions and to complete divestitures
into or out of the Companys operations. The expenses for
both periods related primarily to integration and restructuring
efforts currently underway, including severance and site
consolidation, related to various mergers, acquisitions and
divestitures. In undergoing the various restructuring plans, the
Company anticipates cost savings and revenue synergies as a
result of the combination of the acquired businesses.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest Income. Interest income was $4.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
$4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
35
Interest income in the future will be affected by changes in
short-term interest rates and changes in cash balances, which
may materially increase or decrease as a result of acquisitions,
debt repayment, and stock repurchase programs, and other
financing activities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was
$152.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $192.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The decrease in interest expense was
primarily driven by lower average debt balances driven by the
payoff of the 2023 Convertible Senior Notes in August 2010 and
the payoffs of Term Loan A and Term Loan B in February 2010,
partially offset with interest expenses incurred related to the
issuance of $2,300.0 million of fixed rate unsecured senior
notes, $1,500.0 million of which was issued in February
2010 and $800.0 million of which was issued in December
2010.
The Company adopted a bifurcation requirement on our convertible
senior notes, as prescribed by ASC Topic
470-20, Debt
with Conversion and Other Options, in the first quarter of
2009 and as a result has incurred an additional
$38.0 million and $42.9 million in interest expense
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
During February 2010, the Company fully repaid the remaining
outstanding Term Loans A and B, and recognized a loss of
$54.2 million of deferred financing costs. During the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Company made an early
principal payment of $350.0 million on our Term Loan B,
which resulted in a loss of $12.5 million of deferred
financing costs attributable to the principal paid. The loss is
separately indentified in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as a Loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income, net, was
$(5.9) million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $9.4 million for the same period of 2009.
Included in 2010 was a loss on the discontinuance of cash flow
hedges of $12.9 million and a $1.2 million expense
related to the amortization of purchased intangibles and
amortization of deferred revenue fair market value adjustments
attributable to the joint venture, offset by a gain from the
recovery on an impaired security of $7.1 million and a gain
of $0.6 million on the discontinuance of a cash flow hedge.
During January 2010, the Company completed the sale of its 50%
ownership stake in the Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical
Technologies Instruments joint venture and selected assets and
liabilities directly attributable to the joint venture to
Danaher Corporation for $428.1 million in cash, excluding
related tax obligations and transactions costs, and recorded a
gain of $37.3 million. The gain is separately identified in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a Gain on
divestiture of equity investments.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income
taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income from continuing
operations was 14.4% for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared with 25.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The effective tax rate for 2010 is significantly lower than 2009
which is primarily attributable to the release of certain tax
reserves relating to prior acquisitions; large one-time
repatriation benefits from the Companys global
restructuring activities; increased domestic production tax
benefits.
Comparison
of Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
% Increase
|
|
|
Molecular Biology Systems revenues
|
|
$
|
1,633.3
|
|
|
$
|
745.6
|
|
|
$
|
887.7
|
|
|
|
119
|
%
|
Cell Systems revenues
|
|
|
802.9
|
|
|
|
753.8
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Genetic Systems revenues
|
|
|
856.2
|
|
|
|
118.2
|
|
|
|
738.0
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
3,280.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,620.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,660.0
|
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin
|
|
$
|
1,824.7
|
|
|
$
|
940.8
|
|
|
$
|
883.9
|
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
Total gross margin %
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Revenues
Revenues increased $1,660.0 million or 102% for the year
ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008. The increase in revenue is driven
primarily by an increase of $1,649.4 million due to the
acquisition of AB. The remaining year over year change in
revenue was due to increases of $49.1 million in volume and
pricing, partially offset by a decrease of $39.0 million in
unfavorable currency impacts including hedging.
The Molecular Biology Systems (MBS) division includes the
molecular biology based technologies including basic and
real-time PCR, RNAi, DNA synthesis, thermo-cycler
instrumentation, cloning and protein expression profiling and
protein analysis. Revenue in this division increased by
$887.7 million or 119% in 2009 compared to 2008. This
increase was driven primarily by $875.8 million from the
acquisition of AB and $29.8 million in increased volume and
pricing, partially offset by $17.9 million in unfavorable
currency impacts including hedging. The Cell Systems (CS)
division includes all product lines used in the study of cell
function, including cell culture media and sera, stem cells and
related tools, cellular imaging products, antibodies, drug
discovery services, and cell therapy related products. Revenue
in this division increased $49.1 million or 7% for 2009
compared to 2008. This increase was driven primarily by
$53.9 million from the acquisition of AB,
$13.5 million in increased volume and pricing, and
$0.9 million from acquisitions, partially offset by
$19.2 million in unfavorable currency impacts including
hedging. The Genetic System (GS) division includes sequencing
systems and reagents, including capillary electrophoresis and
the SOLiD system, as well as reagent kits developed specifically
for applied markets, such as forensics, food safety and
pharmaceutical quality monitoring. Revenue in this division
increased by $738.0 million for 2009 compared to 2008,
driven primarily by the acquisition of AB.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased $883.9 million or 94% in 2009
compared to 2008. The increase in gross profit was primarily due
to the acquisition of AB as well as increased pricing partially
offset by an increase of $195.7 million in purchased
intangible assets amortization. Amortization expense related to
purchased intangible assets acquired in our business
combinations was $282.6 million for 2009 compared to
$86.9 million for 2008. The increase was the result of the
amortization of intangibles resulting from the acquisition of
AB. Gross profit for 2009 included an increase of
$18.5 million and $29.9 million of deferred revenue
adjustments and acquired inventory fair market value adjustments
as a result of the AB acquisition. In accordance with purchase
accounting rules, the acquired deferred revenue and inventory is
adjusted to fair value. The Company amortizes this fair value
adjustment into income in line with the underlying acquired
assets and liabilities.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a
|
|
|
|
As a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
of
|
|
Operating
|
|
of
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
% Increase/
|
(in millions)
|
|
Expense
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Expense
|
|
Revenues
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
987.1
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
499.3
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
$
|
487.8
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
337.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
194.6
|
|
|
|
137
|
%
|
Business consolidation costs
|
|
|
112.9
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
74.3
|
|
|
|
192
|
%
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
(91.6
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)%
|
Selling, General and Administrative. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $487.8 million or 98% compared to the
year ended December 31, 2008. This increase was driven
primarily by $448.3 million related to the acquisition of
AB and an increase of $56.6 million in compensation,
bonuses and benefits, partially offset by a decrease of
$14.8 million in infrastructure costs.
Research and Development. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, research and development expenses
increased $194.6 million or 137% compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was driven
37
primarily by $193.1 million related to the acquisition of
AB and an increase of $4.1 million in compensation, bonuses
and benefits, partially offset by $2.0 million in favorable
currency impacts.
Business Consolidation Costs. Business consolidation
costs for the year ended December 31, 2009 were
$112.9 million, compared to $38.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, and represent costs associated
with our integration efforts related to AB and to realign our
business and consolidate certain facilities. The increase in
costs year over year is due to the ramp up of activities
performed in the integration post merger, which was completed in
November 2008. Included in these costs are various activities
related to the acquisition that were associated with combining
the two companies and consolidating redundancies. Also included
in these expenses are one-time expenses associated with
third-party providers assisting in the realignment of the two
companies.
Purchased In-Process Research and Development. Purchased
in-process research and development costs were $1.7 million
for 2009 compared to $93.3 million in 2008. In 2008, in
association with the AB merger as well as some immaterial
acquisitions, the Company acquired and expensed in-process
research and development.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest Income. Interest income was $4.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to
$24.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The decrease was primarily due to economic conditions leading to
lower interest rates available on invested cash balances and
lower cash balances invested.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was
$192.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $85.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The increase in interest expense was
primarily driven by the interest incurred on the
$2,400.0 million of Term Loans A and B issued in November
2008 in connection with the AB merger.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company made
early principal repayments of $350.0 million on term loan
B, which resulted in the Company accelerating the write off of
$12.5 million of deferred financing costs attributable to
the principal repaid. The loss is separately identified in our
results from operations as an early extinguishment of
debt.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income, net, was
$9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $5.7 million for the same period of 2008.
Included in 2009 was $20.3 million of income related to our
interest in the joint venture. The gain was offset by
$10.9 million in foreign currency losses and other items.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income
taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income from continuing
operations was 25.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared with 96.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The effective tax rate for 2009 is significantly lower than 2008
and is primarily attributable to the 2009 release of a valuation
allowance of $19.8 million, and in 2008, the recognition of
$60.6 million in United States income tax in
connection with the repatriation of
non-United
States retained earnings to help fund the AB acquisition and
$93.3 million of acquired purchased in-process research and
development costs which were expensed for financial reporting
purposes but were not deductible for tax purposes.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our
available funds will depend on many factors, including future
business acquisitions, debt repayment, share repurchases,
scientific progress in our research and development programs and
the magnitude of those programs, our ability to establish
collaborative and licensing arrangements, the cost involved in
preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent
claims and competing technological and market developments. We
intend to continue our strategic investment activities in new
product development, in-licensing technologies and acquisitions
that support our platforms. We believe that our annual positive
cash flow generation and existing revolving credit facility will
enable the company to fund current working capital requirements
and continued operations.
The Company has, and expects to be able to, continue to generate
positive cash flow from operations. Future debt repayment, share
repurchases, future acquisitions or additional payments for the
contingent consideration upon the achievement of milestones
pertaining to previous acquisitions may be financed by a
combination of cash on
38
hand, our positive cash flow generation, existing revolving
credit facility, or the issuance of new debt or stock. In the
next 18 months, the Company, upon the achievement of
technological milestones, will have the obligation to complete
its milestone payment in the acquisition of Ion Torrent.
Additionally, the Company will have the opportunity, to settle
its outstanding convertible senior notes prior to the stated
maturity. Such decision will be made based on the prevailing
market conditions in effect at the time the opportunity is
available. The Company, at the election of the holder of the
convertible senior note, could be obligated to repurchase the
note. In order to meet these obligations and opportunities, the
Company will consider whether additional external financing
would be required. While conditions of the credit market at any
given time may impact our ability to obtain credit, the Company
believes that it has the ability to raise funding through public
and private markets at reasonable rates based on the
Companys risk profile, along with its history of strong
cash generation and timely debt repayments. The Company will
continuously assess the most appropriate method of financing the
Companys short and long term operations.
Our working capital factors, such as inventory turnover and days
sales outstanding, are seasonal and, on an interim basis during
the year, may require an influx of short-term working capital.
We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, investments,
cash provided by operations and cash available from bank loans
and lines of credit will satisfy our working capital
requirements, debt obligations and capital expenditures for the
foreseeable future.
Cash and cash equivalents were $813.6 million at
December 31, 2010, an increase of $217.0 million from
December 31, 2009, primarily due to cash provided by
operating activities of $739.1 million and the effect of
exchange rate on cash of $5.5 million, offset by cash used
in investing activities of $119.8 million and cash used in
financing activities of $407.8 million. Further discussion
surrounding the makeup of each cash flow component movement for
the year is listed below.
Operating Activities. Operating activities provided net
cash of $739.1 million during 2010 primarily from net
income of $377.9 million plus net non-cash charges of
$462.7 million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities
provided a net decrease of $101.4 million in cash during
the period. Within the non-cash charges in operating activities,
the primary drivers were amortization of intangible assets of
$299.6 million, depreciation charges of
$123.0 million, deferred debt issuance charges of
$63.0 million, share based compensation of
$79.1 million, and non-cash interest expense of
$38.0 million resulting from the retrospective adoption of
a bifurcation requirement on our convertible senior notes as
prescribed by ASC Topic
470-20, Debt
with Conversion and Other Options, partially offset by
$107.1 million in deferred income taxes and
$37.3 million from the gain on the divestiture of the
Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technology Instruments joint
venture for which the proceeds are included as an investing
activity. The primary drivers of the cash decrease from changes
in operating assets and liabilities were a decrease in accounts
payable of $62.9 million, an increase in trade accounts
receivable of $57.3 million, an increase in inventories of
$21.5 million and an increase in prepaid expense and other
current assets of $14.3 million, which were partially
offset by a net increase in income tax liabilities of
$36.9 million. The Company expects to continue to generate
positive cash flow from operations given the Companys
operating margins and continued non-cash charges associated with
acquisition related costs such as amortization of intangible
assets.
As of December 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents
of $813.6 million, restricted cash of $18.2 million,
and short-term investments of $23.1 million. Our working
capital was $900.1 million as of December 31, 2010
including restricted cash. Our funds for cash and cash
equivalents are currently primarily invested in marketable
securities, money market funds, and bank deposits with
maturities of less than three months. A majority of the
Companys cash and cash equivalents are held in the United
States. Repatriation of funds outside of the United States is
subject to local laws, customs and related tax consequences.
The Company has undertaken restructuring activities in
connection with the merger of Applied Biosystems, which
primarily include one-time termination costs, such as severance
costs related to the elimination of duplicative positions and
change in control agreements to primarily sales, finance, IT,
research and development, and customer service employees. The
restructuring plan also includes charges associated with the
closure of certain leased facilities and one-time relocation
costs for the employees whose employment positions have been
moved to another location. As a result of the plan, the Company
expects to achieve operating efficiencies in future periods
related to salary and overhead costs related to its selling,
general and administrative and research and development costs.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had restructuring
accruals of $9.3 million, for which payments are expected
to be
39
completed in 2011. Since the inception of the plan, the Company
has expensed $142.6 million and paid $132.9 million
through December 31, 2010.
The Companys pension plans and post retirement benefit
plans are funded in accordance with local statutory requirements
and supplemented by voluntary contributions. The funding
requirement is based on the funded status, which is measured by
using various actuarial assumptions, such as interest rate, rate
of compensation increase and expected return on plan assets. The
Companys qualified pension plans are adequately funded at
December 31, 2010. Based on the level of our contributions
to the qualified pension plans and the Dexter PRMB plan during
previous and current fiscal years, we do not expect to have to
fund these pension plans in fiscal year 2011 in order to meet
minimum statutory funding requirements. However, we may
contribute to the funds to maintain the desired funding level at
the Companys discretion. The Companys funding policy
is based upon the amount needed to meet the minimum funding
standards according to the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act (ERISA). The Company may also make additional contributions
from time to time consistent with the Companys cash flow
and business conditions. Based on the actuarial estimates at
December 31, 2010, the Company expects to contribute
$8.6 million to domestic non-qualified pension plans during
2011, a portion of which has already been funded in our rabbi
trust. The Company has other postretirement plans that are
unfunded, however, they are partially funded by insurance
policies. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the
Company contributed $36.1 million, $8.6 million, and
$5.1 million to domestic pension plans, foreign pension
plans, and postretirement plans, respectively. A large portion
of the 2010 contributions were voluntary. The aggregate current
liabilities related to our domestic, foreign and postretirement
plans were $2.4 million, $1.7 million, and
$5.1 million, respectively at December 31, 2010.
Our most significant pension plan is a qualified domestic
pension plan assumed from the AB merger, which constituted
approximately 81% of our consolidated pension plan assets and
approximately 74% of our projected benefit obligations as of
December 31, 2010. The accrual of future service benefits
for participants in the qualified domestic pension plan was
frozen as of June 30, 2004. Effective on July 1, 2005,
the expected rate of compensation increase was no longer
factored into the determination of our net periodic pension
expense as the accrual for future service benefits was frozen. A
one hundred basis point increase or decrease in the discount
rate for the qualified domestic pension plan for the period
ended December 31, 2010 would result in a corresponding
decrease or increase our net periodic pension expense by
approximately $6.0 million. Also, a one hundred basis point
increase or decrease in the expected rate of return on the
pension asset for the period ended December 31, 2010 would
result in a corresponding decrease or increase of our net
periodic pension expense by approximately $5.5 million.
Investing Activities. Net cash used by investing
activities during 2010 was $119.8 million. The cash was
used for purchases of property, plant, and equipment of
$124.8 million, business combinations of
$343.4 million, investment purchases of $26.7 million
and asset purchases of $6.5 million, partially offset by
cash received for the divestiture of the joint venture of
$379.5 million.
For 2011, the Company expects capital expenditures to be in the
range of $125.0 million to $150.0 million. The capital
will include additional capital equipment, information
technology, and integration related capital to support ongoing
business.
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
the Company completed several acquisitions that were not
material individually or collectively to the overall
consolidated financial statements and the results of operations.
The Company completed such acquisitions for the aggregate
purchase price of $840.6 million, $81.6 million, and
$88.5 million during 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Of
the $840.6 million the Company completed during 2010,
$683.3 million was as a result of the acquisition of Ion
Torrent Systems Incorporated (Ion Torrent). The Company used
aggregate cash of $343.4 million, $35.9 million, and
$88.5 million, during the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, in investing activities, for
these acquisitions. The Company also completed a significant
merger in 2008, Applied Biosystems, further discussed below. Due
to the structure of certain acquisitions, the Company also used
aggregate cash of $54.4 million in financing activities,
for purposes such as increasing our ownership interest in a
controlled subsidiary and for acquisition related milestone
payments.
In October 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of Ion
Torrent for a total purchase price of $683.3 million, of
which $263.2 million was paid in cash and
$159.3 million was paid in the Companys common stock
as of December 31, 2010. In addition, the Company has
recorded a contingent consideration liability of
40
$260.8 million related to contingent consideration which
will be satisfied, if the milestone is achieved, in a
combination of cash and the issuance of the Companys
common stock. The payment, if the milestone is achieved, will be
due in the first quarter of 2012. The contingent consideration
liability related to Ion Torrent was measured at fair value at
the acquisition date by applying the weighted average
probability of achievement of a technological and time-based
milestone. The results of operations from Ion Torrent have been
included in the Companys results from the date of
acquisition.
Pursuant to the purchase agreements for certain current and
prior years acquisitions, the Company could be required to
make additional contingent payments in cash or a combination of
cash and equity based on certain technological milestones,
patent milestones and the achievement of future gross sales of
the acquired companies. Some of the purchase agreements the
Company has entered into do not limit the payments to a maximum
amount, nor restrict the payment deadlines. The Company has
sufficient cash on hand, positive cash flow generation and an
existing revolving credit facility to fund such contingent
payments if they become due.
In January 2010, the Company sold its 50% investment stake in
the Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technology Instruments
joint venture for approximately $379.5 million in net cash
proceeds that included cash collected on behalf of, and owed to,
the acquiring entity as part of a related Transition Services
Agreement, and other miscellaneous transaction-related cash
flows. The Company used the net of tax proceeds from the sale,
along with the Senior Note issuance in February 2010 and cash on
hand to pay off existing debt.
In November 2008, the Company completed the merger of Applied
Biosystems for a total purchase price of $4,564.4 million,
of which $2,738.9 million was paid in cash. The results of
operations from Applied Biosystems have been included in the
Companys results from the date of acquisition.
For more information on our business combinations and
divestiture accounting, see Note 2 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financing Activities. Net cash used by financing
activities totaled $407.8 million in 2010. The primary
drivers were $2,320.3 million in principal payments on
long-term obligations and $453.7 million in purchases of
treasury stock, partially offset by $2,288.3 million in
proceeds from long-term obligations and $131.3 million from
stock issued in employee stock plans. At December 31, 2010,
the Company is in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
Senior
Notes
On February 10, 2010, the Company filed a prospectus that
allows the Company to issue, in one or more offerings, senior or
subordinated debt securities covered by the prospectus by filing
a prospectus supplement that contains specific information about
the securities and specific terms being offered. In aggregate,
the Company has issued a principal amount of
$2,300.0 million of fixed unsecured and unsubordinated
Senior Notes (the Notes) as of December 31,
2010, of which $1,500.0 million were offered in February
2010 and $800.0 million were offered in December 2010.
The aggregate net proceeds from the offering in February 2010
were $1,484.8 million after deducting debt discounts as
well as an underwriting discount of $11.9 million. Total
deferred financing costs associated with the issuance of these
senior notes were $14.4 million, including the
$11.9 million underwriting discount and $2.5 million
of legal and accounting fees. The aggregate net proceeds from
the offering in December 2010 were $790.1 million after
deducting underwriting discounts of $6.0 million. Total
deferred financing costs were $7.5 million, including the
$6.0 million underwriting discount and $1.5 million of
legal and accounting fees.
The Company, at its option, may redeem the Notes (prior to
October 15, 2020 for the 2021 Notes) in whole or in part at
any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of
the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and the sum of
the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of the
notes to be redeemed discounted on a semi-annual basis at a
treasury rate equal to a comparable United States Treasury Issue
at the redemption date plus 25 basis points for the 2016
Notes, 30 basis points for the 2013 Notes, the 2015 Notes,
and the 2021 Notes, and 35 basis points for the 2020 Notes,
plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption,
if any. Commencing on October 15, 2020, the Company may
redeem the 2021 Notes, in whole or in part, at any time, at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes being redeemed plus accrued and
41
unpaid interest through the redemption date. Upon the occurrence
of a change of control of the Company that results in a
downgrade of the notes below an investment grade rating, the
indenture requires under certain circumstances that the Company
makes an offer to purchase then outstanding Senior Notes equal
to 101% of the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of repurchase upon the occurrence of a
change of control.
The indentures governing the Senior Notes contain certain
covenants that, among other things, limit the Companys
ability to create or incur certain liens and engage in sale and
leaseback transactions. In addition, the indenture limits the
Companys ability to consolidate, merge, sell, convey,
transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all
of its property and assets. These covenants are subject to
certain exceptions and qualifications.
The entire net proceeds from the 2013, 2015, and 2020 Notes
offering in February 2010 were used to repay the outstanding
balance of term loan A and term loan B, together with the net of
tax proceeds from the sale of our 50% ownership stake in the
Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies Instruments joint
venture and selected assets and liabilities directly
attributable to the joint venture, and cash on hand. The net
proceeds from the 2016 and 2021 Notes offering in December 2010
will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include
the repayment of existing indebtedness.
The
Credit Agreement
In November 2008, the Company entered into a
$2,650.0 million credit agreement (the Credit Agreement)
consisting of a revolving credit facility of
$250.0 million, a term loan A facility of
$1,400.0 million, and a term loan B facility of
$1,000.0 million to fund a portion of the cash
consideration paid for the AB merger. During February 2010, the
Company used the proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes,
the net of tax proceeds from the sale of its 50% ownership stake
in the Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies
Instruments joint venture and selected assets and liabilities
directly attributable to the joint venture, along with cash on
hand to pay off the entire outstanding term loan principal of
$1,972.5 million. After the repayment of the term loans,
the Credit Agreement was amended and restated to increase the
revolving credit facility to $500.0 million with modified
terms. The Company has drawn and repaid $127.0 million from
the Revolving Credit Facility during the year ended
December 31, 2010 to support general working capital needs
and capital expenditures. The Company has also issued
$13.9 million in letters of credit through the Revolving
Credit Facility, and accordingly, the remaining credit available
under that facility is $486.1 million at December 31,
2010. For details on the revolving credit facility as well as
the Companys other lines of credit, refer to Note 4
Lines of Credit.
Convertible
Senior Notes
At December 31, 2010, the Company has classified the
carrying value of $345.4 million of the
31/4%
Convertible Senior Notes (the 2025 Notes) in current liabilities
according to the respective indenture, which allows our holders
of the 2025 Notes to require the Company to purchase all or a
portion of the 2025 Notes at par plus any accrued and unpaid
interest at the earliest on June 15, 2011. In the event
that the holders do not exercise such rights, the remaining
balance of the 2025 Notes will be reclassified back to long-term
debt. The indenture also permits the Company to redeem, in whole
or in part, the 2025 Notes at the Companys option on or
after June 15, 2011. The Company anticipates making this
payment by using cash generated from operating activities, the
existing Revolving Credit Facility, the proceeds from Senior
Notes issuance in December 2010, or a combination of sources,
should the Company determine to redeem the 2025 Notes.
During 2010, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding
balance of the 2% Convertible Senior Notes (2023 Notes).
Holders of our 2023 Notes were allowed by the respective
indenture to require the Company to purchase all or a portion of
the 2023 Notes at par plus accrued and unpaid interest at the
earliest on August 1, 2010. The respective indenture also
permitted the Company to redeem, in whole or in part, the 2023
Notes at the Companys option on or after August 1,
2010. During July 2010, the Company notified the holders of 2023
Notes its intention to redeem all of the outstanding 2023 Notes
on August 6, 2010 at par value. In response to the
Companys announcement and prior to the August 6, 2010
redemption date, Note holders holding a total principal value of
$347.8 million exercised their option to exercise the
redemption and conversion feature. As a result, total cash
consideration of $347.8 million and 2.4 million shares
of the Companys common stock were issued to settle the par
value and the excess of the Notes conversion value based
on a conversion price of $34.12 per share. On August 6,
42
2010, the Company redeemed all of the remaining outstanding 2023
Notes for cash at par value. The Company financed the repayment
of the 2023 notes by using cash on hand and cash generated from
operating activities.
In the event of a change of control of the Company, the holders
of the 2025 Notes and the
11/2% Convertible
Senior Note (2024 Note) have the right to require the Company to
repurchase all or a portion of their notes at a purchase price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus all
accrued and unpaid interest.
For more details of the Companys long-term debt
obligations, refer to Note 5 Long-Term Debt.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In December 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
a program (the December 2010 program), authorizing management to
repurchase up to $500.0 million of common stock. As of
December 31, 2010, no shares were purchased under the
December 2010 program. The Company anticipates repurchasing
shares under the December 2010 program by using cash generated
from operating activities.
In July 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
program (the July 2010 program) authorizing management to
repurchase up to $520.0 million of common stock over the
next two years. During the year ended December 31, 2010,
the Company repurchased 8.4 million shares at a total cost
of $436.6 million under the July 2010 program. The cost of
repurchased shares is included in treasury stock and reported as
a reduction in total equity when a repurchase occurs.
In July 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
program (the July 2007 program) authorizing management to
repurchase up to $500.0 million of common stock, of which
$265.0 million was not used to purchase shares. This
program expired in July 2010. No shares were repurchased under
this program in 2009 and 2010. The cost of repurchased shares
were included in treasury stock and reported as a reduction in
total equity.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at
December 31, 2010 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by
Period(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
More than 5
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
All
Other(2)
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
$
|
812,720
|
|
|
$
|
361,890
|
|
|
$
|
450,830
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
3,092,318
|
|
|
|
109,438
|
|
|
|
461,957
|
|
|
|
683,426
|
|
|
|
1,837,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
7,702
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
250,517
|
|
|
|
42,260
|
|
|
|
63,120
|
|
|
|
43,995
|
|
|
|
101,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing and purchase obligations
|
|
|
80,060
|
|
|
|
58,322
|
|
|
|
17,289
|
|
|
|
3,266
|
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax liability and
interest(2)
|
|
|
148,331
|
|
|
|
28,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,836
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
16,809
|
|
|
|
8,842
|
|
|
|
6,428
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,408,457
|
|
|
$
|
611,875
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,147
|
|
|
$
|
732,087
|
|
|
$
|
1,940,512
|
|
|
$
|
119,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total contractual obligations exclude potential contingent
consideration payments pursuant to certain acquisitions the
Company completed in current and previous years, including the
possible payment in association with the acquisition of Ion
Torrent for which liabilities were fair valued at
$260.8 million as of December 31, 2010. The contingent
consideration for these previous acquisitions are due if
specified future events occur or conditions are met such as the
achievement of certain technological milestones, patent
milestones or the achievement of targeted revenue milestones.
Some acquisitions do not limit the maximum payment amount, nor
restrict the payment deadlines. For more information on our
accounting for business combinations and contingent
considerations, see Note 2 and Note 6 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
43
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys net
unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties,
were $148.3 million. We were unable to reasonably estimate
the timing of uncertain tax liabilities and interest payments in
individual periods beyond twelve months due to uncertainties in
the timing of the effective settlement of tax positions. |
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition. We derive our revenue from the sale
of our products, services and technology. We recognize revenue
from product sales upon transfer of title of the product or
performance of services. Transfer of title generally occurs upon
shipment to the customer. We generally ship to our customers FOB
shipping point. Concurrently, we record provisions for warranty,
returns, and installation based on historical experience and
anticipated product performance. Revenue is not recognized at
the time of shipment of products in situations where risks and
rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer at a point
other than upon shipment to the customer due to the shipping
terms, the existence of an acceptance clause, the achievement of
milestones, or certain return or cancellation privileges.
Revenue is recognized according to the shipping terms, at the
time of customer acceptance, the lapse of acceptance provisions
or cancellation privileges, or achievement of milestones.
Service revenue is recognized over the period services are
performed. If our shipping policies or sales terms were to
change, materially different reported results could occur. In
cases where customers order and pay for products and request
that we store a portion of their order for them at our cost, we
record any material up-front payments as deferred revenue in
current or long-term liabilities, depending on the length of the
customer prepayment, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
recognize revenue upon shipment of the product to the customer.
For instruments where installation is determined to be a
separate earnings process, the portion of the sales price
allocable to the fair value of the installation is deferred and
recognized when installation is complete. We determine the fair
value of the installation process based on technician labor
billing rates, the expected number of hours to install the
instrument based on historical experience, and amounts charged
by third-parties. We continually monitor the level of effort
required for the installation of our instruments to ensure that
appropriate fair values have been determined. Deferred revenue,
which includes customer prepayments and unearned service
revenue, totaled $139.6 million at December 31, 2010.
We also enter into arrangements whereby revenues are derived
from multiple deliverables. In these arrangements, the Company
records revenue as separate elements if the delivered items have
value to the customer on a standalone basis, and if the
arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the
delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered items
is considered probable and substantially in the sellers
control. Our revenue arrangements generally do not include a
general right of return related to the delivered products.
Arrangement consideration should be allocated at the inception
of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative
selling price method based on a three-tier hierarchy. The
relative selling price method requires that the allocation of
arrangement consideration for each deliverable should be based
on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value,
which represents the price charged for a deliverable when it is
sold separately or for a deliverable not yet being sold
separately, the price established by management having the
relevant authority. When VSOE of fair value is not available,
third-party evidence (TPE) of fair value is acceptable, or a
best estimate of selling price if VSOE and TPE are not
available. A best estimate of selling price should be consistent
with the objective of determining the price at which we would
transact if the deliverable were sold regularly on a standalone
basis and also take into account market conditions and company
specific factors. The relative selling price method allocates
any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each
deliverable on the basis of each deliverables estimated
selling price. Applicable revenue recognition criteria are also
considered separately for separate units of accounting. Revenues
from multiple-element arrangements involving license fees,
up-front payments and milestone payments, which are received
and/or
billable in connection with other rights and services that
represent our continuing obligations, are deferred until all
applicable revenue recognition criteria are met for each
separable element. Contract interpretation is normally required
to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the
deliverables specified in a multiple element arrangement should
be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue
recognition purposes, and if so, how the price should be
allocated among the multiple-elements, when to begin to
recognize revenue for each element, and the period over which
revenue should be recognized.
We recognize royalty revenue, including upfront licensing fees,
when the amounts are earned and determinable during the
applicable period based on historical activity, and make
revisions for actual royalties received in the
44
following quarter. Materially different reported results would
be likely if any of the estimated royalty revenue were
significantly different from actual royalties received, however,
historically, these revisions have not been material to our
consolidated financial statements. For those arrangements where
royalties cannot be reasonably estimated, we recognize revenue
on the receipt of cash or royalty statements from our licensees.
Since we are not able to forecast product sales by licensees,
royalty payments that are based on product sales by the
licensees are not determinable until the licensee has completed
their computation of the royalties due
and/or
remitted their cash payment to us. In addition, we recognize
up-front nonrefundable license fees when payments become due
under contractual agreement, unless we have specific continuing
performance obligations requiring deferral of all or a portion
of these fees. If it cannot be concluded that a licensee fee is
fixed or determinable at the outset of an arrangement, revenue
is recognized as payments from third-parties become due. Should
information on licensee product sales become available so as to
enable us to recognize royalty revenue on an accrual basis,
materially different revenues and results of operations could
occur. Royalty revenue totaled $130.4 million,
$122.4 million and $51.0 million for 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Revenue recorded under proportional performance for projects in
process is designed to approximate the amount of revenue earned
based on the percentage of efforts completed within the scope of
the contractual arrangement. We undertake a review of these
arrangements to determine the percentage of the work that has
completed and the appropriate amount of revenue to recognize.
Shipping and handling costs are included in costs of sales.
Shipping and handling costs charged to customers is recorded as
revenue in the period the related product sales revenue is
recognized.
Use of Estimates. Our consolidated financial statements
are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP. In preparing these
statements, we are required to use estimates and assumptions.
While we believe we have considered all available information,
actual results could affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates
represent managements best estimate given current economic
conditions, and as a result, changes in economic conditions can
materially alter actual results from managements best
estimates. We believe that, of the significant accounting
policies discussed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements, the following accounting policies require our most
difficult, subjective or complex judgments:
|
|
Ø
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts. We provide a reserve
against our accounts receivables for estimated losses that may
result from our customers inability to pay. We determine
the amount of the reserve by analyzing known uncollectible
accounts, aged receivables, economic conditions in the
customers country or industry, historical losses and our
customers credit-worthiness. Amounts later determined and
specifically identified by management to be uncollectible are
charged or written off against this reserve. To minimize the
likelihood of uncollectability, customers
credit-worthiness is reviewed periodically based on external
credit reporting services and our experience with the account
and adjusted accordingly. Should a customers account
become past due, we generally place a hold on the account and
discontinue further shipments to that customer, minimizing
further risk of loss. Bad debt expense is recorded as necessary
to maintain an appropriate level of allowance for doubtful
accounts. Additionally, our policy is to fully reserve for all
accounts with aged balances greater than one year, with certain
exceptions determined necessary by management. The likelihood of
a material loss on an uncollectible account would be mainly
dependent on deterioration in the financial condition of that
customer or in the overall economic conditions in a particular
country or environment. Reserves are fully provided for all
expected or probable losses of this nature. Gross trade accounts
receivables totaled $597.8 million and the allowance for
doubtful accounts was $10.4 million at December 31,
2010. Historically, the Companys reserves have been
adequate to cover losses.
|
|
Ø
|
Inventory adjustments. Inventories are stated at lower of
cost or market. We review the components of our inventory on a
regular basis for excess, obsolete and impaired inventory based
on estimated future usage and sales. The Company generally fully
reserves for stock levels in excess of one years expected
usage with certain exceptions deemed necessary by management.
For those inventories not as susceptible to obsolescence, the
Company provides reserves when the materials become spoiled or
dated or specific to the inventory as determined by management.
In the event a lower of cost or market issue arises, the Company
will reserve for
|
45
|
|
|
the value of the inventory in excess of current replacement
cost. The likelihood of any material inventory write-down is
dependent on customer demand, competitive conditions or new
product introductions by us or our competitors that vary from
our current expectations. Gross inventory totaled
$415.7 million and the allowance for excess and obsolete
and price impairment was $92.4 million at December 31,
2010. Historically, the Companys reserve has been adequate
to cover its losses.
|
|
|
Ø |
Valuation of goodwill. We are required to perform a
review for impairment of goodwill in accordance with ASC
Topic 350, IntangibleGoodwill and Other. The Company
performs its goodwill impairment analysis at the reporting unit
level, which aligns with the Companys divisional reporting
structure. Goodwill is considered to be impaired if we determine
that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair
value. In addition to the annual review, an interim review is
required if an event occurs or circumstances change that would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit
below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or
circumstances include:
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate;
|
|
|
Ø
|
a significant decline in our stock price or the stock price of
comparable companies;
|
|
|
Ø
|
a significant decline in our projected revenue or earnings
growth or cash flows;
|
|
|
Ø
|
an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
|
|
|
Ø
|
unanticipated competition;
|
|
|
Ø
|
a severe loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
Ø
|
a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a
significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or
otherwise disposed of; and
|
|
|
Ø
|
the testing for recoverability described under ASC Topic 360,
Property, Plant, and Equipment of a significant asset group
within a reporting unit.
|
Assessing the impairment of goodwill requires us to make
assumptions and judgments regarding the fair value of the net
assets of our reporting units. Additionally, since our reporting
units share the majority of our assets and liabilities, we must
make assumptions and estimates in allocating the carrying value
as well as the fair value of net assets to each reporting unit.
Changes in the assumptions are considered in the analysis, and
the Company performs an internal sensitivity analysis to further
support the Companys assessment.
In accordance with our policy, we completed our most recent
annual evaluation for impairment of goodwill as of
October 1, 2010 and determined that no goodwill impairment
existed. In this analysis, it was determined that no reporting
unit of the Company was at risk of impairment when assessing the
units fair value compared to its carrying value. Our
evaluation included management estimates of cash flow
projections based on an internal strategic review. Key
assumptions from this strategic review included revenue growth
and future gross and operating margin growth. The Company also
makes key assumptions related to its weighted cost of capital
and terminal growth rates. The revenue and margin growth was
based on increased sales of new products as we expect to
maintain our investment in research and development, the effect
and growth from business acquisitions already consummated and
lower selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of revenue. Additional value creators assumed
included increased efficiencies from capital spending. The
resulting cash flows were discounted using a weighted average
cost of capital. Operating mechanisms to ensure that these
growth and efficiency assumptions will ultimately be realized
were also considered in our evaluation. Our market
capitalization at October 1, 2010 was also compared to the
discounted cash flow analysis. No indicators of impairments were
noted through December 31, 2010 and consequently, no
impairment charge has been recorded during the year.
We cannot guarantee our future annual or other periodic reviews
for impairment of goodwill will not result in an impairment
charge. Goodwill totaled $4,372.1 million at
December 31, 2010.
|
|
Ø |
Valuation of intangible and other long-lived assets. We
periodically assess the carrying value of intangible and other
long-lived assets, including capitalized in-process research and
development, which require us to
|
46
|
|
|
make assumptions and judgments regarding the future cash flows
of these assets. The assets are considered to be impaired if we
determine that the carrying value may not be recoverable based
upon our assessment of the following events or changes in
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
Ø
|
the assets ability to continue to generate income from
operations and positive cash flow in future periods;
|
|
|
Ø
|
loss of legal ownership or title to the asset;
|
|
|
Ø
|
significant changes in our strategic business objectives and
utilization of the asset(s); and
|
|
|
Ø
|
the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
If the assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment
charge we recognize is the amount by which the carrying value of
the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Intangible
assets acquired in a business combination that are used for
in-process research and development activities, or capitalized
in-process research and development, are considered indefinite
lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated
research and development efforts. Until capitalized in-process
research and development is no longer considered to be
indefinite, these assets are reviewed annually, or an interim
review is required if an event occurs or circumstances change
that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of an
intangible asset below its carrying amount in accordance with
ASC Topic 350, IntangibleGoodwill and Other. Fair
value is determined by a combination of third-party sources and
discounted cash flows. In addition, we base the useful lives and
related amortization or depreciation expense on our estimate of
the period that the assets will generate revenues or otherwise
be used by the Company. We also periodically review the lives
assigned to our intangible assets to ensure that our initial
estimates do not exceed any revised estimated periods from which
we expect to realize cash flows from the technologies. If a
change were to occur in any of the above-mentioned factors or
estimates, the likelihood of a material change in our reported
results would increase.
At December 31, 2010, the net book value of identifiable
intangible assets that are subject to amortization totaled
$1,957.8 million, the carrying value of identifiable
intangible assets with indefinite lives totaled
$82.4 million and the net book value of property, plant and
equipment totaled $848.0 million.
|
|
Ø |
Valuation of Financial Instruments. We account for our
financial instruments at fair value based on ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC Topic
815, Derivatives and Hedging. In determining fair value, we
consider both the credit risk of our counterparties and our own
creditworthiness. ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements for financial instruments. The framework
requires the valuation of investments using a three tiered
approach in the valuation of investments. The Company reviews
and evaluates the adequacy of the valuation techniques
periodically. In the current year, there have not been any
changes to the Companys valuation methodologies. For
details on the assets and liabilities subject to fair value
measurements and the related valuation techniques used, refer to
Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
A derivative is an instrument whose value is derived from an
underlying instrument or index, such as interest rates, equity
securities, currencies, commodities or credit spreads.
Derivatives include futures, forwards, swaps, or option
contracts, or other financial instruments with similar
characteristics. Derivative contracts often involve future
commitments to exchange interest payment streams or currencies
based on a notional or contractual amount (e.g., interest rate
swaps or currency forwards).
The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on the nature of the derivative and whether
the derivative qualifies as a hedging instrument in accordance
with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Those
hedging instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are
included as an adjustment to revenue or interest expense,
depending upon the underlying transactions the Company is
hedging for. Those hedges that do not qualify for hedging
accounting are included in non-operating income. Materially
different reported results would be likely if volatility of the
markets was different, or the Companys forecasted
transactions were significantly different from actual.
|
|
Ø |
Allocation of Purchase Price to Acquired Assets and
Liabilities in Business Combinations. The cost of an
acquired business is assigned to the tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
|
47
|
|
|
on the basis of their fair values at the date of acquisition. We
assess fair value, which is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date,
using a variety of methods including an income approach such as
a present value technique or a cost approach such as the
estimation of current selling prices and replacement values.
Fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed,
including intangible assets, in-process research and development
(IPR&D), and contingent payments, are measured based on the
assumptions and estimations with regards to the variable factors
such as the amount and timing of future cash flows for the asset
or liability being measured, appropriate risk-adjusted discount
rates, nonperformance risk, or other factors that market
participants would consider. Upon acquisition, we determine the
estimated economic lives of the acquired intangible assets for
amortization purposes, which are based on the underlying
expected cash flows of such assets or per the Company policy.
Adjustments to inventory are based on the fair market value of
inventory and amortized into income based on the period in which
the underlying inventory is sold. Goodwill is an asset
representing the future economic benefits arising from other
assets acquired in a business combination that are not
individually identified and separately recognized. Actual
results may vary from projected results and assumptions used in
the fair value assessments.
|
|
|
Ø
|
Accrued merger- and restructuring- related costs. To the
extent that exact amounts are not determinable, we have
estimated amounts for direct costs of our acquisitions,
merger-related expenses and liabilities related to our business
combinations and restructurings in accordance with ASC Topic
420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations and Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue
95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination
(EITF 95-3)
in conjunction with the merger with Applied Biosystems and other
acquisitions consummated prior to January 1, 2009. Our
accrued costs for merger and restructuring related were
$9.3 million at December 31, 2010, which are expected
to be paid in full in early 2011. Effective January 1,
2009, in the event the Company incurs the direct and indirect
costs related to business combinations and related
restructurings, the Company will expense such cost in the
periods in which the cost is incurred. Materially different
reported results would be likely if any of the estimated costs
or expenses were significantly different from actual or if the
approach, timing and extent of the restructuring plans adopted
by management were different.
|
|
Ø
|
Benefit and pension plans. We sponsor and manage several
pension plans and postretirement health plans for employees and
former employees, and nonqualified supplemental benefit plans
for select domestic and foreign employees. A majority of the
Companys current employees do not participate in these
plans. Accounting and reporting for the pension plans and
postretirement health plans requires the use of assumptions for
discount rates, expected returns on plan assets and rates of
compensation increase that are used by our actuaries to
determine our liabilities and annual expenses for these plans in
addition to the value of the plan assets included in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, the weighted average discount rates we
used to determine the benefit obligation were 5.45%, 4.83%, and
4.80% for domestic pension plans, foreign pension plans, and
postretirement health plans, respectively. The weighted average
discount rates we used to determine the net periodic pension
cost were 6.00%, 5.28%, and 5.60% for domestic pension plans,
foreign pension plans, and postretirement health plans,
respectively. The weighted average long-term rates of expected
return on plan assets were in a range of 6.00% to 8.00%, 5.31%,
and 8.00% for domestic pension plans, foreign pension plans, and
postretirement health plans, respectively. Our actuaries also
rely on assumptions, such as mortality rates, in preparing their
estimates for us. The liabilities for the pension plans and
postretirement plans are generally determined using the unit
credit method, which is to expense each participants
benefit under the plan as they accrue. The discount rate is
derived by the yield curve and consists of spot interest rates
at half year increments for each of the next 30 years based
on pricing and yield information for high quality corporate
bonds. The Company determines the best-fit regression curve to
the bond data, and converts this coupon yield curve to a spot
yield curve, using techniques which assume no arbitrage
opportunities. The Company matches the pension cash flow to the
spot rates to determine a single equivalent discount rate. The
rate of expected return on plan assets is an expected weighted
average rate of earnings on the funds, which is a blended rate
of historical returns and forward looking capital market
assumptions over the next 20 years adjusted by taking into
account the benefits of diversification and rebalancing of the
funds.
|
48
The likelihood of materially different valuations for assets,
liabilities or expenses, would depend on interest rates,
investment returns, actual non-investment experience or
actuarial assumptions that are different from our current
expectations. Actual weighted average allocation of our plan
assets or valuation of our plan assets and benefit obligations
may fluctuate significantly year over year. These fluctuations
can be caused by conditions unrelated to our actuarial
assumptions, including shifts in the global economic
environment, market performance and plan funding status.
Unexpected unrealized gains or losses in the plan assets or
benefit obligation are reflected in other comprehensive income
in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized into income
over the expected plan lives.
|
|
Ø |
Income taxes. Significant judgment is required in
determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the
ordinary course of a global business, there are many
transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain.
Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of
intercompany arrangements to share revenue and costs. In such
arrangements, there are uncertainties about the amount and
manner of such sharing, which could ultimately result in changes
once the arrangements are reviewed by taxing authorities.
Although we believe that our approach to determining the amount
of such arrangements is reasonable, no assurance can be given
that the final resolution of these matters will not be
materially different than reflected in our historical income tax
provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material
effect on our income tax provisions or benefits in the period in
which such determination is made.
|
Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The
likelihood of a material change in our expected realization of
these assets depends on our ability to generate sufficient
future taxable income of the proper character and in the
necessary jurisdictions. Our ability to generate enough taxable
income to utilize our deferred tax assets depends on many
factors, among which are our ability to deduct tax operating
loss and capital loss carryforwards against future taxable
income, the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies,
reversing deferred tax liabilities, changes in the deductibility
of interest paid on our convertible senior notes and any
significant changes in the tax treatment received on our
business combinations. We believe that our deferred tax assets,
net of our valuation allowance, should be realizable due to our
estimate of future profitability in the United States and
foreign jurisdictions, as applicable. Subsequent revisions to
estimates of future taxable profits and losses and tax planning
strategies could change the amount of the deferred tax asset we
would be able to realize in the future, and therefore could
increase or decrease the valuation allowance.
ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes defines the confidence level
that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the
financial statements. In accordance, we regularly assess
uncertain tax positions in each of the tax jurisdictions in
which we have operations and account for the related financial
statement implications. Unrecognized tax benefits have been
reported in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes
two-step approach under which the tax effect of a position
is recognized only if it is more-likely-than-not to
be sustained and the amount of the tax benefit recognized is
equal to the largest tax benefit that is greater than fifty
percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement of the
tax position. Determining the appropriate level of unrecognized
tax benefits requires us to exercise judgment regarding the
uncertain application of tax law. The amount of unrecognized tax
benefits is adjusted when information becomes available or when
an event occurs indicating a change is appropriate. Future
changes in unrecognized tax benefits requirements could have a
material impact on our results of operations.
The Company has resolved the United States federal tax audit of
certain acquired company pre-acquisition tax years. As a result
of the examination, the Company released approximately
$11.4 million of acquired tax reserves through income tax
expense.
The Company continues to benefit from reduced tax rates in
Singapore and Israel. Singapores taxing authority granted
the Company pioneer company status which provides an incentive
encouraging companies to undertake activities that have the
effect of promoting economic or technological development in
Singapore. This incentive equates to a tax exemption on earnings
associated with the Companys manufacturing activities and
continues through June 30, 2014. The Company qualifies for
an incentive tax benefit in Israel which provides for a reduced
3.5% tax rate on earnings from its subsidiary in Israel. This
incentive has been granted for an indefinite period given
minimum sales and investment levels are maintained. The impact
of the tax
49
holiday in Singapore decreased Singapore taxes by
$21.2 million, $20.1 million and $0.6 million for
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As residual United States
deferred tax liabilities were provided on the 2009 and 2008
earnings of Singapore, income tax expense was reduced only for
the 2010 reduction in Singapore taxes. The impact of the tax
holiday in Israel decreased both taxes paid and income tax
expense by $1.5 million, $1.0 million and
$0.8 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
Ø |
Share-Based Compensation. We grant share-based awards to
eligible employees and directors to purchase shares of our
common stock. In addition, we have qualified employee stock
purchase plans in which eligible employees may elect to withhold
up to 15% of their compensation to purchase shares of our common
stock on a quarterly basis at a discounted price equal to 85% of
the lower of the employees offering price or the closing
price of the stock on the date of purchase. The benefits
provided by these plans qualify as share-based compensation
under the provisions of ASC Topic 718,
CompensationStock Compensation, which requires us to
recognize compensation expense based on their estimated fair
values determined on the date of grant for all share-based
awards granted, and the cumulative expense is adjusted by
modified or cancelled shares subsequently.
|
For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized
$40.0 million and $39.0 million of pre-tax
compensation expense for employee stock options and purchase
rights, and restricted stock units, respectively. At
December 31, 2010, there was $48.0 million and
$76.0 million remaining in unrecognized compensation cost
related to employee stock options and restricted stock units,
respectively, which are expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.7 years and 2.0 years,
respectively.
We estimate the fair value of share-based awards on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing method
(Black-Scholes method). The determination of fair value of
share-based awards using an option-pricing model requires the
use of certain estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amount of share-based compensation cost recognized in
our Consolidated Statements of Income. These include estimates
of the expected term of share-based awards, expected volatility
of our stock price, expected dividends and the risk-free
interest rate. These estimates and assumptions are highly
subjective and may result in materially different amounts should
circumstances change and we employ different assumptions in our
application of fair value assessment in future periods. The
Company uses historical forfeiture rate trends as a basis for
estimating pre-vesting forfeitures. Should there be a material
shift in employee vesting trends, there could be a material
change in actual forfeiture experience.
For share-based awards issued during the year ended
December 31, 2010, we estimated the expected term by
considering various factors including the vesting period of
options granted, employees historical exercise and
post-employment termination behavior and aggregation by
homogeneous employee groups. Our estimated volatility was
derived using a combination of our historical stock price
volatility and the implied volatility of market-traded options
of our common stock with terms of up to approximately two years.
Our decision to use a combination of historical and implied
volatility was based upon the availability of actively traded
options of our common stock and our assessment that such a
combination was more representative of future expected stock
price trends. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends
on our common stock and currently do not anticipate paying such
cash dividends. We currently anticipate that we will retain all
of our future earnings for use in the development and expansion
of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any
determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our
results of operations, financial condition, financial covenants,
tax laws and other factors as the Board of Directors, in its
discretion, deems relevant. The risk-free interest rate is based
upon United States Treasury securities with remaining terms
similar to the expected term of the share-based awards.
|
|
Ø |
Insurance, environmental and divestiture reserves. We
maintain self-insurance reserves to cover potential property,
casualty and workers compensation exposures from current
operations and certain former businesses the Company acquired.
These reserves are based on loss probabilities and take into
account loss history as well as projections based on industry
statistics. We also maintain environmental reserves to cover
estimated costs for certain environmental exposures assumed in
previous acquisitions. The environmental reserves, which are not
discounted, are determined by management based upon currently
available information. Historically, the Companys
environmental reserves have been adequate to cover its costs.
Divestiture reserves
|
50
|
|
|
are maintained for known claims and warranties assumed in the
acquisition. The product liability and warranty reserves are
based on management estimates that consider historical claims.
As actual losses and claims become known to us, we may need to
make a material change in our estimated reserves, which could
also materially impact our results of operations. Our insurance,
environmental and divestiture reserves totaled
$10.6 million at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Ø |
Litigation reserves. Estimated amounts for claims that
are probable and can be reasonably estimated are recorded as
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The likelihood
of a material change in these estimated reserves would be
dependent on new claims as they may arise and the favorable or
unfavorable outcome of the particular litigation. Both the
amount and range of loss on pending litigation is uncertain. As
such, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the
liability that could result from unfavorable outcomes in
litigation. As additional information becomes available, we
assess the potential liability related to our pending litigation
and revise our estimates. Such revisions in our estimates of the
potential liability could materially impact our results of
operations and financial position.
|
Segment Information. In connection with the acquisition
of AB and the resulting reorganization, the Company has
determined in accordance with ASC Topic 280, Segment
Reporting to operate as one operating segment. The Company
believes our chief operating decision maker (CODM) makes
decisions based on the Company as a whole. In addition, the
Company shares the common basis of organization, types of
products and services that derive revenues, and economic
environments. Accordingly, we believe it is appropriate to
operate as one reporting segment. The Company has disclosed the
revenues for each of its internal divisions to allow the reader
of the financial statements the ability to gain transparency
into the operations of the Company. We have restated historical
divisional revenue information to conform to the current year
presentation.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For information on the recent accounting pronouncements
impacting our business, see Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
MARKET
RISK
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates,
and we selectively use financial instruments to manage these
risks. We do not enter into financial instruments for
speculation or trading purposes. These financial exposures are
monitored and managed by us as an integral part of our overall
risk management program, which recognizes the unpredictability
of financial markets and seeks to reduce potentially adverse
effects on our results.
Foreign
Currency
We translate the financial statements of each foreign subsidiary
with a functional currency other than the United States dollar
into the United States dollar for consolidation using
end-of-period
exchange rates for assets and liabilities and average exchange
rates during each reporting period for results of operations.
Net gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign
financial statements and the effect of exchange rate changes on
intercompany receivables and payables of a long-term investment
nature are recorded as a separate component of
stockholders equity. These adjustments will affect net
income only upon sale or liquidation of the underlying
investment in foreign subsidiaries.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates can affect our
reported results of operations, which are reported in United
States dollars. Based on the foreign currency rate in effect at
the time of the translation of our foreign operations into
United States dollars, reported results could be different from
prior periods even if the same amount and mix of our products
were sold at the same local prices during the two periods. This
will affect our reported results of operations and also makes
the comparison of our business performance in two periods more
difficult. For example, our revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2010 were approximately $3,588.1 million
using applicable foreign currency exchange rates for that
period. However, applying the foreign currency exchange rates in
effect during the year ended December 31, 2009 to our
revenues generated by foreign subsidiaries whose functional
currencies differ from the United States dollars for 2010 when
including the results of our hedging program would
51
result in approximately $44.3 million less revenue for that
period. These changes in currency exchange rates have affected
and will continue to affect, our reported results, including our
revenues, revenue growth rates, gross margins, income and losses
as well as assets and liabilities.
Foreign
Currency Transactions
We have operations through legal entities in Europe,
Asia-Pacific and the Americas. As a result, our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows can be affected
by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company had $408.3 million of
accounts receivable and $46.2 million of accounts payable,
respectively, denominated in a foreign currency. The Company has
accounts receivables and payables denominated in both the
functional currency of the legal entity as well as receivables
and payables denominated in a foreign currency that differs from
the functional currency of the legal entity. For receivables and
payables denominated in the legal entitys functional
currency, the Company does not have financial statement risk,
and therefore does not hedge such transactions. For those
receivables and payables denominated in a currency that differs
from the functional currency of the legal entity, the Company
hedges such transactions to prevent financial statement risk. As
a result, a hypothetical movement in foreign currency rates
would not be expected to have a material financial statement
impact on the settlement of these outstanding receivables and
payables.
Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on the value of
these receivables and payables were included in other income and
expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Net
currency exchange gains and (losses) recognized on business
transactions, net of hedging transactions, were
$0.4 million, $(9.0) million and $8.3 million for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and are included in other income and expense in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These gains and
losses arise from the timing of cash collections compared to the
hedged transactions, which can vary based on timing of actual
customer payments.
The Companys intercompany foreign currency receivables and
payables are primarily concentrated in the euro, British pound
sterling, Canadian dollar and Japanese yen. Historically, we
have used foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate foreign
currency risk on these intercompany foreign currency receivables
and payables. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company
had a notional principal amount of $1,012.7 million and
$1,497.9 million, respectively, in foreign currency forward
contracts outstanding to hedge currency risk on specific
intercompany receivables and payables denominated in a currency
that differs from the legal entitys functional currency.
These foreign currency forward contracts, as of
December 31, 2010, which settle in January 2011 through May
2011, effectively fix the exchange rate at which these specific
receivables and payables will be settled, so that gains or
losses on the forward contracts offset the losses or gains from
changes in the value of the underlying receivables and payables.
At December 31, 2010, the Company did not expect there will
be a significant impact from unhedged foreign currency
intercompany transactions in the foreseeable future.
The notional principal amounts provide one measure of the
transaction volume outstanding as of period end, but do not
represent the amount of our exposure to market loss. In many
cases, outstanding principal amounts offset assets and
liabilities and the Companys exposure is less than the
notional amount. The estimates of fair value are based on
applicable and commonly used pricing models using prevailing
financial market information. The amounts ultimately realized
upon settlement of these financial instruments, together with
the gains and losses on the underlying exposures, will depend on
actual market conditions during the remaining life of the
instruments.
Refer to Note 11 in the notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information on the Companys hedging
programs.
Cash Flow
Hedges
The ultimate United States dollar value of future foreign
currency sales generated by our reporting units is subject to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The
Companys intent is to limit this exposure from changes in
currency exchange rates through hedging. When the dollar
strengthens significantly against the foreign currencies, the
decline in the United States dollar value of future foreign
currency revenue is offset by gains in the value of the forward
contracts designated as hedges. Conversely, when the dollar
weakens, the opposite occurs. The Company uses foreign currency
forward contracts to mitigate foreign currency risk on
forecasted foreign currency sales that are expected to be
settled within next twelve months. The change in fair value
prior to their maturity was
52
accounted for as cash flow hedges, and recorded in other
comprehensive income, net of tax, in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets according to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and
Hedging. To the extent any portion of the forward contracts
is determined to not be an effective hedge, the increase or
decrease in value prior to the maturity was recorded in other
income or expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company did
not recognize any material ineffective portion of its hedging
instruments, and no hedging relationships were terminated as a
result of ineffective hedging or forecasted transactions no
longer probable of occurring for foreign currency forward
contracts. The Company continually monitors the probability of
forecasted transactions as part of the hedge effectiveness
testing. At December 31, 2010, the Company had a notional
principal amount of $486.8 million in foreign currency
forward contracts outstanding to hedge foreign currency revenue
risk under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and
the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is reported
in other current assets or other current liabilities in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as appropriate. The Company reclasses
deferred gains or losses reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income into revenue when the underlying foreign
currency sales occur and are recognized in consolidated
earnings. The Company uses inventory turnover ratio for each
international operating unit to align the timing of a hedged
item and a hedging instrument to impact the Consolidated
Statements of Operations during the same reporting period. At
December 31, 2010, the Company expects to reclass
$44.7 million of net losses on derivative instruments from
accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings during the
next twelve months. At December 31, 2010, a hypothetical
10% change in foreign currency rates against the United States
dollar would result in a decrease or an increase of
approximately $45.0 million in the fair value of foreign
currency derivatives accounted for under cash flow hedges.
Actual gains or losses could differ materially from this
analysis based on changes in the timing and amount of currency
rate movements.
Commodity
Prices
Our exposure to commodity price changes relates to certain
manufacturing operations that utilize certain commodities as raw
materials. We manage our exposure to changes in those prices
primarily through our procurement and sales practices.
Interest
Rates
Our investment portfolio is maintained in accordance with our
investment policy that defines allowable investments, specifies
credit quality standards and limits the credit exposure of any
single issuer. The fair value of our cash equivalents,
marketable securities, short-term investments, and derivatives
is subject to change as a result of changes in market interest
rates and investment risk related to the issuers credit
worthiness or our own credit risk. The Company uses credit
default swap spread to derive risk-adjusted discount rate to
measure the fair value of some of our financial instruments. At
December 31, 2010, we had $854.8 million in cash, cash
equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments, all of
which approximated the fair value. Changes in market interest
rates would not be expected to have a material impact on the
fair value of these assets at December 31, 2010, as the
assets consisted of highly liquid securities with short-term
maturities. The Company accounts for the $22.4 million of
its long-term investments in non-publicly traded companies under
the cost method, thus, changes in market interest rates would
not be expected to have an impact on these investments. See
Note 11 in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had a carrying value
of $3,068.4 million in debt with fixed interest rates,
thus, the variability in market interest rates would not be
expected to have a material impact on our scheduled interest
payments. The Company will continuously assess the most
appropriate method of financing the Companys short and
long term operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
entered into the interest rate swaps to effectively hedge the
interest expense from variable rates to fixed rates related to
certain portion of term loan A. As a result of the
discontinuance of interest rate swap hedge due to the term loan
A payoff in February 2010, the Company recognized a
$12.9 million loss as the forecasted transactions were no
longer probable of occurring.
53
Fair
Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
requires certain financial and non-financial assets and
liabilities to be measured at fair value using a three tiered
approach. There were zero and $263.3 million of assets and
liabilities, respectively, for which the Company used
level 3, or significant unobservable inputs, to measure
fair value at December 31, 2010. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, $34.8 million of assets were
transferred out of level 3, all of which related to the
settlement of the auction rate securities with UBS and the
related put option. During 2010, the Company transferred
$260.8 million of contingent consideration liabilities into
level 3 and also recorded a reduction to cost of revenues
of $6.3 million out of level 3 as fair value
adjustments on contingent consideration liabilities as a result
of business combinations. For further discussion on the
Companys fair value measurements and valuation
methodologies, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
OFF
BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company does not have any material off balance sheet
arrangements. For further discussion on the Companys
commitments and contingencies, refer to Note 6
Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
See discussion under Market Risk in Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
54
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To The Board of Directors and the
Stockholders of Life Technologies Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Life Technologies Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(c). These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of Life
Technologies Corporations management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Life Technologies Corporation at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Life
Technologies Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed
an unqualified opinion thereon.
San Diego, California
February 25, 2011
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
813,569
|
|
|
$
|
596,587
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
23,079
|
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
Restricted cash and investments
|
|
|
18,153
|
|
|
|
40,721
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $10,389 and $10,809, respectively
|
|
|
587,456
|
|
|
|
591,058
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
323,318
|
|
|
|
353,222
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
90,947
|
|
|
|
19,822
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
190,003
|
|
|
|
183,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,046,525
|
|
|
|
1,796,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments (includes none and $34,800 measured at
fair value, respectively)
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
380,167
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
847,984
|
|
|
|
829,032
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,372,073
|
|
|
|
3,783,806
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
2,040,175
|
|
|
|
2,071,607
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
26,752
|
|
|
|
106,562
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
130,242
|
|
|
|
148,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
9,486,199
|
|
|
$
|
9,115,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
347,749
|
|
|
$
|
481,701
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
174,449
|
|
|
|
237,250
|
|
Restructuring accrual
|
|
|
9,326
|
|
|
|
26,548
|
|
Deferred compensation and related benefits
|
|
|
202,229
|
|
|
|
244,625
|
|
Deferred revenues and reserves
|
|
|
109,981
|
|
|
|
129,035
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
248,661
|
|
|
|
203,139
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
53,990
|
|
|
|
63,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,146,385
|
|
|
|
1,385,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,727,624
|
|
|
|
2,620,089
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
145,298
|
|
|
|
155,934
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
557,982
|
|
|
|
693,256
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
114,726
|
|
|
|
118,084
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
356,155
|
|
|
|
115,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,048,170
|
|
|
|
5,089,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value, 6,405,884 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares
authorized; 207,243,588 and 196,297,725 shares issued,
respectively
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
5,222,859
|
|
|
|
4,784,786
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
96,612
|
|
|
|
51,968
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
532,499
|
|
|
|
154,204
|
|
Less cost of treasury stock; 24,992,450 shares and
16,214,572 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(1,419,966
|
)
|
|
|
(966,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life Technologies stockholders equity
|
|
|
4,434,076
|
|
|
|
4,026,668
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
4,438,029
|
|
|
|
4,026,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
9,486,199
|
|
|
$
|
9,115,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes for additional information.
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,588,094
|
|
|
$
|
3,280,344
|
|
|
$
|
1,620,323
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
1,188,199
|
|
|
|
1,173,057
|
|
|
|
592,696
|
|
Purchased intangibles amortization
|
|
|
293,754
|
|
|
|
282,562
|
|
|
|
86,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,106,141
|
|
|
|
1,824,725
|
|
|
|
940,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
1,023,179
|
|
|
|
987,116
|
|
|
|
499,312
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
375,465
|
|
|
|
337,099
|
|
|
|
142,505
|
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
93,287
|
|
Business consolidation costs
|
|
|
93,450
|
|
|
|
112,943
|
|
|
|
38,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,493,744
|
|
|
|
1,438,850
|
|
|
|
773,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
612,397
|
|
|
|
385,875
|
|
|
|
167,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
24,595
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(152,322
|
)
|
|
|
(192,911
|
)
|
|
|
(85,061
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(54,185
|
)
|
|
|
(12,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on divestiture of equity investments
|
|
|
37,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(5,864
|
)
|
|
|
9,362
|
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
(170,845
|
)
|
|
|
(191,329
|
)
|
|
|
(54,762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
441,552
|
|
|
|
194,546
|
|
|
|
112,239
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(63,694
|
)
|
|
|
(49,952
|
)
|
|
|
(107,883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
377,858
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations (net)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
377,858
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
$
|
378,295
|
|
|
$
|
144,594
|
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Life
Technologies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Life
Technologies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
183,398
|
|
|
|
175,872
|
|
|
|
99,229
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
190,591
|
|
|
|
181,415
|
|
|
|
103,685
|
|
See accompanying notes for additional information.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life Tech.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in-
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
107,039
|
|
|
$
|
1,070
|
|
|
$
|
2,588,941
|
|
|
$
|
112,454
|
|
|
$
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
(14,906
|
)
|
|
$
|
(859,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,847,125
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,847,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability, net of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,545
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,434
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,282
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205,547
|
)
|
Common stock issuances for business combination
|
|
|
80,835
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
1,821,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,822,353
|
|
Common stock issuances under employee stock plans
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
46,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,177
|
|
Tax benefit of employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,198
|
)
|
|
|
(100,242
|
)
|
|
|
(100,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,242
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net of repurchases for minimum
tax liability
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(4,942
|
)
|
|
|
(4,169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,169
|
)
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
189,629
|
|
|
$
|
1,896
|
|
|
$
|
4,508,259
|
|
|
$
|
(98,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,610
|
|
|
|
(16,159
|
)
|
|
$
|
(964,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,456,538
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,456,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability, net of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,090
|
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,679
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,369
|
|
Common stock issuances for business combination
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
38,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,938
|
|
Common stock issuances under employee stock plans
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
172,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
171,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,908
|
|
Tax benefit of employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net of repurchases for minimum
tax liability
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
196,297
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
$
|
4,784,786
|
|
|
$
|
51,968
|
|
|
$
|
154,204
|
|
|
|
(16,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
(966,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,026,668
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,026,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liability, net of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,343
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,418
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,405
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
73,133
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,295
|
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
377,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422,939
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
424,230
|
|
Common stock issuances for business combination
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
159,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,354
|
|
|
|
35,177
|
|
|
|
194,531
|
|
Purchase of subsidiaries shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,393
|
)
|
|
|
(32,515
|
)
|
|
|
(37,908
|
)
|
Common stock issuances under employee stock plans
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
131,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
131,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,868
|
|
Tax benefit of employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,763
|
|
Common stock issuances for convertible debt
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
43,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,433
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,442
|
)
|
|
|
(436,629
|
)
|
|
|
(436,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(436,629
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted shares, net of repurchases for minimum
tax liability
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(16,975
|
)
|
|
|
(16,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,976
|
)
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
207,244
|
|
|
$
|
2,072
|
|
|
$
|
5,222,859
|
|
|
$
|
96,612
|
|
|
$
|
532,499
|
|
|
|
(24,992
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,419,966
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,434,076
|
|
|
$
|
3,953
|
|
|
$
|
4,438,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes for additional information.
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
377,858
|
|
|
$
|
144,594
|
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities, including effects of businesses acquired
and divested:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
122,978
|
|
|
|
115,691
|
|
|
|
45,677
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
299,616
|
|
|
|
295,954
|
|
|
|
86,875
|
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
|
62,972
|
|
|
|
31,847
|
|
|
|
5,633
|
|
Amortization of inventory fair market value adjustments
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
62,747
|
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
Amortization of deferred revenue fair market value adjustment
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
34,791
|
|
|
|
7,136
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
79,049
|
|
|
|
60,102
|
|
|
|
46,990
|
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
(21,053
|
)
|
|
|
(14,058
|
)
|
|
|
(18,538
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(107,067
|
)
|
|
|
18,252
|
|
|
|
36,177
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
Gain on sale of equity investment
|
|
|
(37,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of in-process research and development
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
93,287
|
|
Debt discount amortization
|
|
|
38,035
|
|
|
|
42,866
|
|
|
|
40,159
|
|
Other non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
11,442
|
|
|
|
13,040
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(57,334
|
)
|
|
|
(10,448
|
)
|
|
|
(112,294
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(21,456
|
)
|
|
|
11,808
|
|
|
|
11,076
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(14,281
|
)
|
|
|
(3,576
|
)
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(4,862
|
)
|
|
|
(6,108
|
)
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(62,889
|
)
|
|
|
6,525
|
|
|
|
(22,192
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,680
|
)
|
|
|
36,725
|
|
|
|
109,169
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
36,946
|
|
|
|
(122,751
|
)
|
|
|
(9,936
|
)
|
Cash impact of hedging activities
|
|
|
25,119
|
|
|
|
16,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
739,089
|
|
|
|
744,008
|
|
|
|
365,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,513
|
)
|
Maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,692
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(26,733
|
)
|
|
|
(11,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for business combinations
|
|
|
(343,387
|
)
|
|
|
(55,036
|
)
|
|
|
(2,827,802
|
)
|
Net cash paid for asset purchases
|
|
|
(6,450
|
)
|
|
|
(31,251
|
)
|
|
|
(31,200
|
)
|
Proceeds from asset divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash received for divestiture of equity investment
|
|
|
379,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(124,817
|
)
|
|
|
(180,631
|
)
|
|
|
(81,886
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(119,804
|
)
|
|
|
(257,998
|
)
|
|
|
(2,889,709
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term obligations
|
|
|
(2,320,299
|
)
|
|
|
(425,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,117
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term obligations
|
|
|
2,288,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,435,600
|
|
Principal payments on short-term obligations
|
|
|
(127,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term obligations
|
|
|
127,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in business combination milestones and non-controlling
interest acquisitions
|
|
|
(54,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance cost payments on long-term obligations
|
|
|
(17,938
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,260
|
)
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
21,053
|
|
|
|
14,058
|
|
|
|
18,538
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
131,346
|
|
|
|
171,238
|
|
|
|
47,825
|
|
Capital lease payments
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(453,713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,832
|
)
|
|
|
(105,184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(407,808
|
)
|
|
|
(242,341
|
)
|
|
|
2,301,402
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
16,988
|
|
|
|
(47,690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
216,982
|
|
|
|
260,657
|
|
|
|
(270,215
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
596,587
|
|
|
|
335,930
|
|
|
|
606,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
813,569
|
|
|
$
|
596,587
|
|
|
$
|
335,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes for additional information.
59
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
ACTIVITY, SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTS
|
Business
Activity
Life Technologies Corporation is a global life sciences company
dedicated to improving the human condition. Our systems,
consumables and services enable scientific researchers and
commercial markets to accelerate scientific exploration, leading
to discoveries and developments that better the quality of life.
Our products are also used in forensics, food and water safety
and animal health testing and other industrial applications.
The Company delivers a broad range of products and services,
including systems, instruments, reagents, software, and custom
services. Our growing portfolio of products includes innovative
technologies for capillary electrophoresis based sequencing,
next generation sequencing, PCR, sample preparation, cell
culture, RNA interference analysis, functional genomics
research, proteomics and cell biology applications, as well as
clinical diagnostic applications, forensics, animal, food,
pharmaceutical and water testing analysis. The Company also
provides our customers convenient and value-added purchasing
options through thousands of sales and service professionals,
e-commerce
capabilities and onsite supply center solutions.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Life Technologies Corporation and its majority owned or
controlled subsidiaries, collectively referred to as Life
Technologies (the Company). All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
When there is a portion of equity in an acquired subsidiary not
attributable, directly or indirectly, to the parent, the Company
records the fair value of the noncontrolling interests at the
acquisition date and classifies the amounts attributable to
noncontrolling interests separately in equity in the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. Any subsequent
changes in a parents ownership interest while the parent
retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary are
accounted for as equity transactions. For details on the
noncontrolling interests, refer to Note 1 Ownership
Interest in Subsidiaries.
For purposes of these Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, gross profit is defined as revenues less cost of
revenues and purchased intangibles amortization and gross margin
is defined as gross profit divided by revenues. Operating income
is defined as gross profit less operating expenses and operating
margin is defined as operating income divided by revenues.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
and Segment Information
The Company has reclassified historically presented sales
and marketing and general and administrative
expense classifications on the Statement of Operations as one
combined classification of selling, general and
administrative costs as this reflects the underlying
nature of the incurred costs. Additionally, the Company has
reclassified the historical presentation of cash impact from
hedging activities on the Statement of Cash Flows to align to
the current year presentation.
The Company has assessed and determined it operates as one
operating segment under the guidance of The Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification, or ASC, Topic 280, Segment
60
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Reporting. The Company believes our chief operating
decision maker (CODM) makes decisions based on the Company as a
whole. In addition, the divisions within the Company share
similar customers and types of products and services that derive
revenues and have consistent product margins. Accordingly, the
Company operates as one reporting segment. The Company disclosed
the revenues for each of its internal divisions to allow the
reader of the financial statements the ability to gain
transparency into the operations of the Company in Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. We have restated
historical divisional revenue information to conform to the
current year presentation.
The reclassification had no impact on previously reported
results of operations or financial position.
Concentrations
of Risks
Approximately $712.3 million, $655.8 million and
$367.4 million, or 20%, 21% and 23% of the Companys
revenues during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, were derived from university and research
institutions which management believes are, to some degree,
directly or indirectly supported by the United States
Government. If there were to be a significant change in current
research funding, particularly with respect to the National
Institute of Health, it could have a material adverse impact on
the Companys future revenues and results of operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-14,
Revenue Arrangements Containing Software Elements,
updating ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. This
guidance amends ASU
2009-13 to
exclude from its scope all tangible products containing both
software and non-software components that operate together to
deliver the products essential functionality. This
guidance is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted; therefore, the
Company has early adopted this pronouncement in the fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2010 along with other related
pronouncements. Upon adoption, the pronouncement did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements and is
not expected to have a material impact on our future operating
results.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a Consensus of the
FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, updating ASC Topic 605,
Revenue Recognition. ASU
2009-13
requires multiple-deliverable arrangements to be separated using
a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable and significantly expands disclosure requirements of
such arrangements. The selling price for each deliverable will
be based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) if
available, the third-party evidence if VSOE is not available, or
estimated selling price if VSOE and third-party evidence are not
available. Arrangement consideration will be allocated at the
inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method. The relative selling price method
allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each
deliverable on the basis of each deliverables estimated
selling price. This guidance is effective for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted; therefore, the Company has adopted this pronouncement
in the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. Upon
adoption, the pronouncement did not have a material impact on
its consolidated financial statements and is not expected to
have a material impact on our future operating results.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive our revenue from the sale of our products, services
and technology. We recognize revenue from product sales upon
transfer of title of the product or performance of services.
Transfer of title generally occurs upon shipment to the
customer. We generally ship to our customers FOB shipping point.
Concurrently, we record provisions for warranty, returns, and
installation based on historical experience and anticipated
product performance. Revenue is not recognized at the time of
shipment of products in situations where risks and rewards of
ownership are transferred to the customer at a point other than
upon shipment to the customer due to the shipping
61
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
terms, the existence of an acceptance clause, the achievement of
milestones, or certain return or cancellation privileges.
Revenue is recognized according to the shipping terms, at the
time of customer acceptance, the lapse of acceptance provisions
or cancellation privileges, or achievement of milestones.
Service revenue is recognized over the period services are
performed. If our shipping policies or sales terms were to
change, materially different reported results could occur. In
cases where customers order and pay for products and request
that we store a portion of their order for them at our cost, we
record any material up-front payments as deferred revenue in
current or long-term liabilities, depending on the length of the
customer prepayment, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
recognize revenue upon shipment of the product to the customer.
For instruments where installation is determined to be a
separate earnings process, the portion of the sales price
allocable to the fair value of the installation is deferred and
recognized when installation is complete. We determine the fair
value of the installation process based on technician labor
billing rates, the expected number of hours to install the
instrument based on historical experience, and amounts charged
by third-parties. We continually monitor the level of effort
required for the installation of our instruments to ensure that
appropriate fair values have been determined. Deferred revenue,
which includes customer prepayments and unearned service
revenue, totaled $139.6 million at December 31, 2010.
We also enter into arrangements whereby revenues are derived
from multiple deliverables. In these arrangements, the Company
records revenue as separate elements if the delivered items have
value to the customer on a standalone basis, and if the
arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the
delivered item, delivery or performance of the undelivered items
is considered probable and substantially in the sellers
control. Arrangement consideration should be allocated at the
inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method that is based on a three-tier
hierarchy. The relative selling price method requires that the
estimated selling price for each deliverable should be based on
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value, which
represents the price charged for a deliverable when it is sold
separately or for a deliverable not yet being sold separately,
the price established by management having the relevant
authority. When VSOE of fair value is not available, third-party
evidence (TPE) of fair value is acceptable, or a best estimate
of selling price if VSOE and TPE are not available. A best
estimate of selling price should be consistent with the
objective of determining the price at which we would transact if
the deliverable were sold regularly on a standalone basis and
also take into account market conditions and company specific
factors. The relative selling price method allocates any
discount in the arrangement proportionally to each deliverable
on the basis of each deliverables estimated selling price.
Applicable revenue recognition criteria are also considered
separately for separate units of accounting. Revenues from
multiple-element arrangements involving license fees, up-front
payments and milestone payments, which are received
and/or
billable in connection with other rights and services that
represent our continuing obligations, are deferred until all
applicable revenue recognition criteria are met for each
separable element. Contract interpretation is normally required
to determine the appropriate accounting, including whether the
deliverables specified in a multiple element arrangement should
be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue
recognition purposes, and if so, how the price should be
allocated among the multiple-elements, when to begin to
recognize revenue for each element, and the period over which
revenue should be recognized.
We recognize royalty revenue, including upfront licensing fees,
when the amounts are earned and determinable during the
applicable period based on historical activity, and make
revisions for actual royalties received in the following
quarter. Materially different reported results would be likely
if any of the estimated royalty revenue were significantly
different from actual royalties received; however, historically,
these revisions have not been material to our consolidated
financial statements. For those arrangements where royalties
cannot be reasonably estimated, we recognize revenue on the
receipt of cash or royalty statements from our licensees. Since
we are not able to forecast product sales by licensees, royalty
payments that are based on product sales by the licensees are
not determinable until the licensee has completed their
computation of the royalties due
and/or
remitted their cash payment to us. In addition, we recognize
up-front nonrefundable license fees when due under contractual
agreement, unless we have specific continuing performance
obligations requiring deferral of all or a portion of these
fees. If it cannot be concluded that a licensee fee is fixed or
determinable at the outset of an arrangement, revenue is
recognized as payments from third-parties become due. Should
information on licensee product sales become available so as to
enable us to recognize royalty revenue on an accrual basis,
materially different revenues
62
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
and results of operations could occur. Royalty revenue totaled
$130.4 million, $122.4 million and $51.0 million
for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Revenue recorded under proportional performance for projects in
process is designed to approximate the amount of revenue earned
based on the percentage of efforts completed within the scope of
the contractual arrangement. We undertake a review of these
arrangements to determine the percentage of the work that has
completed and the appropriate amount of revenue to recognize.
Shipping and handling costs are included in costs of sales.
Shipping and handling costs charged to customers are recorded as
revenue in the period the related product sales revenue is
recognized.
Restricted
Cash and Related Liabilities
The Company had restricted cash of $18.2 million and
$40.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, which was held in Rabbi Trusts for the payment of
certain non-qualified pension plan liabilities or for the
termination benefits that resulted from prior acquisitions and
mergers. The funds are invested primarily in money market
accounts. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had
zero and $3.2 million, respectively, for termination
benefit liabilities recognized in the restructuring accrual, and
$18.3 million and $36.7 million, respectively, for
non-qualified pension plan liabilities recognized in current
liabilities and pension liabilities in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets in association with the funds held in the Rabbi Trusts.
Rabbi Trusts remain in place for the term of benefits payable,
which in the case of non-qualified pension plans is the death of
the participants or their designated beneficiaries. The Rabbi
Trust assets are subject to the claims of the Companys
creditors in the event of the Companys insolvency. No
further contributions are required to be made to the Rabbi
Trusts as of December 31, 2010.
Accounts
Receivable
The Company provides reserves against trade receivables for
estimated losses that may result from a customers
inability to pay. The amount is determined by analyzing known
uncollectible accounts, aged receivables, economic conditions in
the customers country or industry, historical losses and
customer credit-worthiness. Bad debt expense is recorded as
necessary to maintain an appropriate level of allowance for
doubtful accounts in selling, general and administrative
expense. Additionally, our policy is to fully reserve for all
accounts with aged balances greater than one year, with certain
exceptions determined necessary by management. Amounts
determined to be uncollectible are charged or written off
against the reserve. To date such doubtful accounts reserves, in
the aggregate, have been adequate to cover collection losses.
Inventories
Inventories are generally stated at lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out method) or market. Cost is determined principally on
the standard cost method for manufactured goods that
approximates cost on the
first-in,
first-out method. The Company reviews the components of its
inventory on a regular basis for excess, obsolete and impaired
inventory and makes appropriate dispositions as obsolete
inventory is identified. Reserves for excess, obsolete and
impaired inventory were $92.4 million and
$106.3 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Inventories include material, labor and overhead
costs in addition to purchase accounting adjustments to
write-up
acquired inventory to estimated selling prices less costs to
complete, costs of disposal and a reasonable profit allowance.
63
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Inventories consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Raw materials and components
|
|
$
|
87,557
|
|
|
$
|
87,369
|
|
Work in process (materials, labor and overhead)
|
|
|
63,772
|
|
|
|
52,307
|
|
Finished goods (materials, labor and overhead)
|
|
|
171,989
|
|
|
|
213,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net
|
|
$
|
323,318
|
|
|
$
|
353,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the
following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Hedge assets
|
|
$
|
15,189
|
|
|
$
|
19,803
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
70,395
|
|
|
|
67,851
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
104,419
|
|
|
|
96,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
190,003
|
|
|
$
|
183,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For details on hedging activity, refer to Note 11 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
For details on the assets and liabilities subject to fair value
measurements and the related valuation techniques used, and for
details on derivative instruments, refer to Note 11 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We account for our financial instruments at fair value based on
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
and ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. In
determining fair value, we consider both the credit risk of our
counterparties and our own creditworthiness. ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value
and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The
framework requires the valuation of investments using a three
tiered approach. The Company reviews and evaluates the adequacy
of the valuation techniques periodically. In the current year,
there have not been any changes to the Companys valuation
methodologies.
A derivative is an instrument whose value is derived from an
underlying instrument or index, such as interest rates, equity
securities, currencies, commodities or credit spreads.
Derivatives include futures, forwards, swaps, or option
contracts, or other financial instruments with similar
characteristics. Derivative contracts often involve future
commitments to exchange interest payment streams or currencies
based on a notional or contractual amount (e.g., interest rate
swaps or currency forwards).
The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative
instrument depends on the nature of the derivative and whether
the derivative qualifies as a hedging instrument in accordance
with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Those
hedging instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are
included as an adjustment to revenue or interest expense,
depending upon the underlying transactions the Company is
hedging for. Those hedges that do not qualify for hedge
accounting are included in non-operating income.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles
The Company reviews long-lived assets and intangibles for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We
periodically evaluate the original assumptions and rationale
utilized in the establishment of the carrying value and
estimated lives of our long-lived assets. The criteria used for
these evaluations include managements estimate of the
assets continuing ability to generate income from
operations and positive cash flow in future periods as well as
the strategic significance of any intangible asset in the
Companys business objectives. If assets are considered to
be impaired,
64
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying
value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets, which
is determined by applicable market prices, when available. There
was no material impairment loss recognized for long-lived assets
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
Property
and Equipment
We capitalize major renewals and improvements that significantly
add to productive capacity or extend the life of an asset. We
expense repairs, maintenance, and minor renewals and
improvements as incurred. We remove the cost of assets and
related depreciation from the related accounts on the balance
sheet when assets are sold, or otherwise disposed of, and any
related gains or losses are reflected in current earnings.
Leased capital assets are included in property and equipment.
Depreciation of property and equipment under capital leases is
included in depreciation expense. We compute depreciation
expense of owned property and equipment based on the expected
useful lives of the assets primarily using the straight-line
method. We amortize leasehold improvements over their estimated
useful lives or the term of the applicable lease, whichever is
less.
Capitalized internal-use software costs include only those
direct costs associated with the actual development or
acquisition of computer software for internal use, including
costs associated with the design, coding, installation and
testing of the system. Costs associated with preliminary
development, such as the evaluation and selection of
alternatives, as well as training, maintenance and support are
expensed as incurred. At December 31, 2010 and 2009 the
Company had $129.0 million and $114.6 million in
unamortized capitalized software costs, respectively. For the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company
amortized into expense $25.2 million, $19.6 million
and $10.0 million, respectively, related to capitalized
computer software costs.
Property and equipment consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,638
|
|
|
$
|
134,647
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
1-50
|
|
|
|
449,962
|
|
|
|
397,052
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1-10
|
|
|
|
413,004
|
|
|
|
371,325
|
|
Internal use software
|
|
|
1-10
|
|
|
|
207,904
|
|
|
|
163,056
|
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,236
|
|
|
|
109,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,269,744
|
|
|
|
1,175,861
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421,760
|
)
|
|
|
(346,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
847,984
|
|
|
$
|
829,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method
over their estimated useful lives. Amortization expense related
to intangible assets associated with product sales for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was
$293.8 million, $282.6 million and $86.9 million,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010,
according to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations,
$74.9 million of acquired in-process research and
development was capitalized and assigned an indefinite life.
Such assets will be accounted for as indefinite life intangible
assets subject to annual impairment test, or earlier if an event
or circumstance indicates that impairment may have occurred,
until completion or abandonment of the acquired projects. Upon
reaching the end of the research and development project, the
Company will amortize the acquired in-process research and
development over its estimated useful life or expense the
acquired in-process research and development should the research
and development project be unsuccessful with no future
alternative use. In connection with acquisitions,
$1.7 million, $1.7 million and $93.3 million of
the purchase price was allocated to in-process research and
development and expensed in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, according to SFAS 141, Accounting
for Business Combinations. In addition, the Company recorded
65
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
$0.8 million, $9.7 million and $0.8 million of
amortization expense in other income (expense) for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively, in
connection with its former joint venture investment.
Intangible assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
life
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
life
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
amortization
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,227,942
|
|
|
$
|
(797,694
|
)
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,109,976
|
|
|
$
|
(705,015
|
)
|
Purchased tradenames and trademarks
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
|
|
323,863
|
|
|
|
(120,573
|
)
|
|
|
9 years
|
|
|
|
307,785
|
|
|
|
(75,485
|
)
|
Purchased customer base
|
|
|
12 years
|
|
|
|
1,441,781
|
|
|
|
(305,865
|
)
|
|
|
12 years
|
|
|
|
1,423,383
|
|
|
|
(167,856
|
)
|
Other intellectual properties
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
299,586
|
|
|
|
(111,216
|
)
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
248,964
|
|
|
|
(80,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,293,172
|
|
|
$
|
(1,335,348
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,090,108
|
|
|
$
|
(1,028,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased tradenames
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets
owned as of December 31, 2010 for each of the five
succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
303,916
|
|
2012
|
|
|
287,576
|
|
2013
|
|
|
275,077
|
|
2014
|
|
|
233,516
|
|
2015
|
|
|
215,985
|
|
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price of net tangible
and intangible assets acquired in business combinations over
their estimated fair value. In accordance with ASC Topic 350,
IntangiblesGoodwill and Other, goodwill is tested for
impairment on an annual basis and earlier if there is an
indicator of impairment. Furthermore, purchased intangible
assets other than goodwill are amortized over their useful lives
unless these lives are determined to be indefinite.
The Company performs its goodwill impairment tests annually
during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year and earlier if an
event or circumstance indicates that impairment has occurred.
The Company utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate
the fair value of each reporting unit. The evaluation included
management estimates of cash flow projections based on an
internal strategic review. Key assumptions from this strategic
review included revenue growth, future gross and operating
margin growth, and the Companys weighted cost of capital.
The Company also used internal allocations of assets and
liabilities and Company specific discount rates to determine the
estimated value of each reporting unit. Based on this analysis,
the Company determined that no impairment exists at
October 1, 2010. No indicators of impairments were noted
through December 31, 2010 and consequently, no impairment
charge has been recorded during the year.
66
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,574,779
|
|
Purchase adjustments of income tax considerations
|
|
|
(20,789
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
148,162
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
31,156
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
50,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,783,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase adjustments of income tax considerations
|
|
|
(4,944
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
593,297
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,372,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the Company finalized its purchase price allocation related
to the AB acquisition in 2009, the Company made purchase
adjustments for certain income tax considerations, established
its restructuring plan, as well as finalized other miscellaneous
adjustments, driving the increase in other adjustments during
2009. Goodwill acquired during 2010 primarily consisted of the
goodwill acquired from the Ion Torrent acquisition. See
Note 2 Business Combinations for further
details on business acquisitions.
Product
Warranties
We accrue warranty costs for product sales at the time of
shipment, or when the associated revenue is recognized, based on
historical experience as well as anticipated product
performance. Our product warranties extend over a specified
period of time ranging up to two years from the date of sale
depending on the product subject to warranty. The product
warranty accrual covers parts and labor for repairs and
replacements covered by our product warranties. We periodically
review the adequacy of our warranty reserve, and adjust, if
necessary, the warranty percentage and accrual based on actual
experience and estimated costs to be incurred. At
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the outstanding balance of
product warranties was $7.2 million and $12.6 million,
respectively.
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the
following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accrued hedge liabilities
|
|
$
|
46,290
|
|
|
$
|
21,138
|
|
Accrued royalties
|
|
|
64,552
|
|
|
|
57,399
|
|
Accrued warranty
|
|
|
7,177
|
|
|
|
12,586
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
130,642
|
|
|
|
112,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
248,661
|
|
|
$
|
203,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and Development Costs
Costs incurred in research and development activities are
expensed as incurred. Research and development costs incurred
for collaborations that generate revenue where there are
specific product deliverables, research and development services
incurred for defined performances or other design specifications
are recorded in cost of sales. During the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 research and development
expenses were $375.5 million, $337.1 million and
$142.5 million, respectively.
67
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes, using enacted tax rates in effect
for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Accounting
for Share-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation under the
guidance prescribed by ASC Topic 718, CompensationStock
Compensation. The Company uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model (Black-Scholes model) to estimate the fair
value of share-based compensation cost at the grant date, which
is recognized as expense over the employees requisite
service period for all share-based awards granted and adjusted
by modification or cancellation as necessary. For details on the
share-based compensation recognized and assumptions used, refer
to Note 10 Employee Stock Plans.
Computation
of Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income
attributable to Life Technologies by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings
per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur from
the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes where the effect of those securities is
dilutive;
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options and restricted stock units;
|
|
|
Dilutive performance awards; and
|
|
|
Dilutive Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
|
Computations for basic and diluted earnings per share for the
years ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
$
|
378,295
|
|
|
|
183,398
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive performance awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
2% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/2% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2024
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
31/4% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies plus assumed
conversions
|
|
$
|
378,466
|
|
|
|
190,591
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities not included above since they
are antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
$
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
175,872
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive performance awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
2% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
31/4% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies plus assumed
conversions
|
|
$
|
144,764
|
|
|
|
181,415
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities not included above since they
are antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/2% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Life
Technologies
|
|
$
|
4,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax attributable
to Life Technologies
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total basic earnings
|
|
$
|
5,714
|
|
|
|
99,229
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive performance awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
2% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/2% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2024
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations plus assumed conversions
attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
|
4,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax attributable
to Life Technologies
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted earnings
|
|
$
|
5,849
|
|
|
|
103,685
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive securities not included above since they
are antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
31/4% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income, including unrealized
gains and losses that are excluded from the Consolidated
Statements of Operations, is reported as a separate component in
stockholders equity. The unrealized gains and losses
include foreign currency translation adjustments, unrealized
gains or losses from hedging transactions, and pension liability
adjustments, net of tax.
69
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes, consists
of the following at December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
158,106
|
|
|
$
|
86,701
|
|
Unrealized loss on hedging transactions
|
|
|
(23,846
|
)
|
|
|
(8,428
|
)
|
Pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(37,648
|
)
|
|
|
(26,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
96,612
|
|
|
$
|
51,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
Interest in Subsidiaries
The effects of changes in the Companys ownership interest
in its subsidiaries during the years ended December 31,
2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
$
|
378,295
|
|
|
$
|
144,594
|
|
Decrease in Life Technologies paid-in capital for
purchases of subsidiaries shares
|
|
|
(5,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change from net income attributable to Life Technologies and
transfers to noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
372,902
|
|
|
$
|
144,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations
The components of discontinued operations relate to the sale of
the Companys BioReliance business unit and its subsidiary,
BioSource Europe, S.A. for the periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year 2007, the Company completed the sale of
its BioReliance subsidiary to Avista Capital Partners and also
finalized the sale of BioSource Europe, S.A., a diagnostic
business located in Belgium, to a private investor group. Net
proceeds from these divestitures less cash spent as part of the
disposal process were $209.9 million. The Company accounted
for its discontinued operations in accordance with ASC Topic
205-20,
Discontinued Operations.
Insignificant
Business Combinations
During 2010 and 2009, the Company completed several acquisitions
that were notindividually or collectivelyconsidered
material to the overall consolidated financial statements and
the results of the Companys operations. These acquisitions
have been included in the consolidated financial statements from
the respective dates of the acquisitions. Certain acquisitions
included contingent consideration that requires the Company to
continuously assess and adjust the fair value of the contingent
consideration liabilities, if necessary, until the settlement or
70
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
expiration of contingency occurs. The Company has included
summary information around acquisitions during the reporting
period to supplement the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheets, Statement of Operations and Statement of Cash Flows.
On October 1, 2010, the Company acquired all outstanding
equity shares of Ion Torrent with an upfront payment of
$375.0 million, and time and technology based milestones of
$350.0 million. The acquisition includes a
$50.0 million milestone, which was earned and paid in
November 2010 and a subsequent milestone of $300.0 million
that, if earned, will be paid in January 2012, all of which
milestones are paid with a combination of cash and the
Companys common stock. The Company issued, as part of the
upfront payment and satisfaction of the $50.0 million
milestone, 3.4 million shares of common stock through
December 31, 2010, or the equivalent of
$159.3 million, and cash in the amount of
$263.2 million. In performing the accounting for the
transaction, all consideration transferred was measured at its
acquisition date fair value.
Ion Torrent has developed a new method of DNA sequencing by
enabling a direct connection between chemical and digital
information through the use of proven semiconductor technology.
Ion Torrents proprietary chip-based sequencing represents
a new paradigm in DNA sequencing by using
PostLighttm
sequencing technology, the first of its kind to eliminate the
cost and complexity associated with the extended optical
detection currently used in all other sequencing platforms. The
result is a sequencing system that is simpler, faster, less
expensive and more scalable than other sequencing technologies.
The purchase price exceeded the value of acquired tangible and
identifiable intangible assets, and therefore the Company has
allocated such excess to goodwill. The goodwill is related to
estimated synergies in the purchase price and non-capitalizable
intangible assets, such as employee workforce, acquired in
association with the acquisition. With this merger, the Company
expects to benefit from synergies created by combining Ion
Torrents proprietary technologies, product pipeline and
R&D capabilities with the Companys commercial
channel, sample preparation, sequencing automation, informatics,
and reagent expertise. The goodwill is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
The Company is still finalizing the allocation of the purchase
price, therefore, the purchase price allocation or the
provisional measurements of intangible assets, goodwill and
deferred income tax assets may be adjusted if the Company
recognizes additional assets or liabilities to reflect new
information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed
as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected
the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date. The
Company expects to complete the allocation of purchase price
during fiscal year 2011.
The components of the preliminary purchase price allocation at
the acquisition date and the purchase price consideration
transferred at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Consideration:
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to Ion Torrent security holders
|
|
$
|
263,200
|
|
Fair value of common stock issued to Ion Torrent security holders
|
|
|
159,300
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
260,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
683,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price:
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
145,100
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
74,900
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
504,300
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
27,400
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(88,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
683,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquired identified intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Intangible Assets
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Average Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technologies
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
$
|
104,800
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
74,900
|
|
Purchased patents and trade secrets
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
40,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchased technologies and purchased patents and trade
secrets include the technologies that support the Personal
Genome Machine
PGMtm
and the next several generations derived from the same
technologies applied to
PGMtm
technologies. The Company amortizes these intangible assets
based on the straight line method of amortization over periods
that expected cash flows of the acquired intangibles are
generated. The Company allocated $74.9 million of the
purchase price of Ion Torrent to purchased in-process research
and development, or IPR&D. The IPR&D assets are
capitalized as indefinite lived assets, and are subject to
impairment review at least annually or at a time a triggering
event indicates a possible impairment, until the completion or
abandonment of the associated research and development efforts.
Upon completion, the capitalized assets will be amortized at
their respective projected remaining useful life as of the
completion date, as assessed on the completion date.
The merger agreement with Ion Torrent contained an aggregate
$350.0 million of milestone arrangements, which under
ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, the Company is
required to fair value contingent consideration at the date of
acquisition. The $300.0 million milestone was considered
contingent consideration and fair valued at the acquisition
date. The $50.0 million milestone was assessed at 100%
probability of occurring, and therefore considered a financing
arrangement and accrued at the acquisition date. The
$50.0 million milestone was paid in cash and in the
Companys common stock in November 2010. The contingent
consideration was fair valued at $260.8 million at the date
of acquisition by applying a weighted average probability on the
achievement of the technological milestones based on the
assessment developed during the valuation process, then deriving
the present value of the outcome from the time at which the
obligation is settled, by applying a discount rate that
incorporated a market participants view of the risk
associated with the expected milestone payment. The Company will
assess the fair value of contingent consideration periodically
with subsequent revisions reflected in the Statement of
Operations.
Some transactions related to the Ion Torrent acquisition were
accounted for separately from the acquisition purchase price
because they represented separate units of accounting. In the
acquisition agreement, unvested stock options were accelerated
and milestone payments to certain continuing employees are
contingent upon future employment. As a result, a portion of
upfront payments and milestone payments are deemed compensatory
in nature and thus expensed in the Statement of Operations at
the date of acquisition or accrued over the periods which the
post acquisition services are rendered, respectively. For the
year ended December 31, 2010, the Company expensed
$17.3 million in the Statement of Operations related to the
acceleration of unvested stock options.
72
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Divestiture
of Equity Investment
In January 2010, the Company completed the sale of its 50%
ownership stake in the Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical
Technologies Instruments joint venture and selected assets and
liabilities directly attributable to the joint venture to
Danaher Corporation for $428.1 million in cash, excluding
transactions costs, and recorded a gain of $37.3 million in
other income in Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
year ended December 31, 2010. Included in the sale was the
carrying value of the equity investments of $330.4 million,
accounts receivable of $71.3 million, net inventory of
$55.1 million, other current assets of $17.6 million,
long-term assets of $13.7 million, accounts payable of
$9.8 million, other current liabilities of
$80.8 million, and long-term liabilities of
$6.7 million. The transaction allows the Company to focus
on its core competencies for biological solutions in life
science research, genomic medicine, molecular diagnostics and
applied markets.
The
Company acquired the joint venture as a part of the merger with
AB consummated in November 2008. The Company accounted for its
investment in the joint venture using the equity method which
required us to show our share of earnings or losses from the
investment in other income as a single amount in accordance with
the guidance in ASC Topic 323, InvestmentsEquity Method
and Joint Ventures. At December 31, 2009, the
investment value in the equity was $337.4 million and was
included in long-term investments in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Business
Consolidation Costs
The Company continues to integrate recent and pending
acquisitions and divestitures into its operations and recorded
approximately $93.5 million, $112.9 million and
$38.6 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
primarily related to integration and restructuring efforts,
including severance and site consolidation currently underway
related to various mergers, acquisitions and divestitures. In
association with the AB merger the Company has undergone a
separate restructuring plan, details of which are included at
Note 12 Restructuring Costs.
73
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
3.
|
GEOGRAPHIC
INFORMATION
|
Information by geographic area for the years ended
December 31, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Product and service sales to unrelated customers located
in(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,394,799
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,637
|
|
|
$
|
688,304
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
191,457
|
|
|
|
157,891
|
|
|
|
72,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
1,586,256
|
|
|
|
1,394,528
|
|
|
|
760,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,087,523
|
|
|
|
1,083,487
|
|
|
|
540,057
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
716,152
|
|
|
|
622,897
|
|
|
|
261,119
|
|
Other Foreign
|
|
|
67,799
|
|
|
|
57,018
|
|
|
|
7,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product and service revenue
|
|
|
3,457,730
|
|
|
|
3,157,930
|
|
|
|
1,569,286
|
|
Total other revenue
|
|
|
130,364
|
|
|
|
122,414
|
|
|
|
51,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
3,588,094
|
|
|
$
|
3,280,344
|
|
|
$
|
1,620,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-lived assets located
in(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
710,475
|
|
|
$
|
707,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
3,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
713,832
|
|
|
|
711,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
48,763
|
|
|
|
50,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
40,176
|
|
|
|
26,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe
|
|
|
88,939
|
|
|
|
77,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
41,742
|
|
|
|
38,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Foreign
|
|
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
847,984
|
|
|
$
|
829,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Product and service revenues exclude royalties since they are
not allocated on a geographic basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Net long-lived assets relate to the Companys property,
plant and equipment. The Company does not allocate other
long-term assets by location. |
Under the Credit Agreement, the Company entered into a revolving
credit facility of $250.0 million (the Revolving Credit
Facility) with Bank of America, N.A in November 2008. In May
2010, the Company amended and restated the Credit Agreement,
expanding the Revolving Credit Facility to $500.0 million
for the purpose of general working capital, capital
expenditures,
and/or other
capital needs. Fees associated with the Revolving Credit
Facility include a commitment fee for unused funds ranging from
25.0 to 50.0 basis points; letter of credit fees ranging
from 150.0 to 250.0 basis points; and interest on
borrowings accrued at the Companys election based on base
rate borrowing or Eurocurrency rate borrowing. The base rate
borrowing rate is a margin of 50.0 to 150.0 basis points
plus the higher of a) the Federal Funds Rate plus
50.0 basis points, b) Bank of Americas prime
rate, or c) the Eurocurrency rate plus 100.0 basis
points. The Eurocurrency borrowing rate is a margin of 150.0 to
250.0 basis points plus the Eurocurrency borrowing rate.
Margins and fees are based on a rate table specified in the
agreement and determined by the Companys consolidated
leverage ratio for the period. As of December 31, 2010, the
Company has issued $13.9 million of letters of credit under
the Revolving Credit Facility and accordingly, the remaining
available credit is $486.1 million. The applicable
borrowing rate would have been 1.80% and 2.75% at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
74
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, foreign subsidiaries in
China, India, Mexico and Japan had available bank lines of
credit denominated in local currency to meet short-term working
capital requirements. The credit facilities bear interest at
fixed rates or based on the TIBOR rate. Under these lines of
credit, the United States dollar equivalent of these facilities
totaled $13.5 million and $13.4 million at December 31
2010 and 2009, respectively, of which $0.2 million and zero
was outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3.375% Senior Notes (principal due 2013), net of
unamortized discount
|
|
$
|
249,914
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
4.400% Senior Notes (principal due 2015), net of
unamortized discount
|
|
|
498,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.500% Senior Notes (principal due 2016), net of
unamortized discount
|
|
|
399,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.000% Senior Notes (principal due 2020), net of
unamortized discount
|
|
|
748,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.000% Senior Notes (principal due 2021), net of
unamortized discount
|
|
|
398,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
2% Convertible Senior Notes (principal due 2023), net of
unamortized discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,595
|
|
11/2% Convertible
Senior Notes (principal due 2024) , net of unamortized discount
|
|
|
428,356
|
|
|
|
409,858
|
|
31/4% Convertible
Senior Notes (principal due 2025), net of unamortized discount
|
|
|
345,360
|
|
|
|
336,481
|
|
Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330,000
|
|
Term Loan B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,500
|
|
Secured Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,800
|
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
|
|
8,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
3,075,373
|
|
|
|
3,101,790
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(347,749
|
)
|
|
|
(481,701
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
2,727,624
|
|
|
$
|
2,620,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of the long-term debt listed above at
December 31, 2010, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imputed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest On
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Payments
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Under Capital
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
347,988
|
|
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
$
|
347,749
|
|
2012
|
|
|
430,936
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
430,701
|
|
2013
|
|
|
251,857
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
251,680
|
|
2014
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
228
|
|
2015
|
|
|
498,725
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
498,713
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,546,316
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
1,546,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,076,073
|
|
|
$
|
(700
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,075,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Senior
Notes
On February 10, 2010, the Company filed a prospectus that
allows the Company to issue in one or more offerings, senior or
subordinated debt securities covered by the prospectus by filing
a prospectus supplement that contains specific information about
the securities and specific terms being offered. In aggregate,
the Company has issued a principal amount of
$2,300.0 million of fixed unsecured and unsubordinated
Senior Notes (the Notes) as of December 31,
2010, of which $1,500.0 million were offered in February
2010 and $800.0 million were offered in December 2010.
During February 2010, the Company issued $1,500.0 million
of fixed rate unsecured notes which consisted of an aggregate
principal amount of $250.0 million of 3.375% Senior
Notes due 2013 (the 2013 Notes) at an issue price of
99.95%, an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million of
4.40% Senior Notes due 2015 (the 2015 Notes) at
an issue price of 99.67% and an aggregate principal amount of
$750.0 million of 6.00% Senior Notes due 2020 (the
2020 Notes) at an issue price of 99.80%. During
December 2010, the Company issued an additional
$800.0 million of fixed rate unsecured notes which
consisted of an aggregate principal amount of
$400.0 million of 3.50% Senior Notes due 2016 (the
2016 Notes) at an issue price of 99.84% and an
aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million of
5.00% Senior Notes due 2021 (the 2021 Notes) at
an issue price of 99.56%.
As a result, the Company recorded an aggregate $3.3 million
of debt discounts for the 2013 Notes, 2015 Notes and 2020 Notes
at the time of issuance in February 2010, and an aggregate
$2.4 million of debt discounts for the 2016 Notes and 2021
Notes at the time of issuance in December 2010. At
December 31, 2010, the unamortized debt discount balance
was $2.9 million for the 2013 Notes, 2015 Notes, and 2020
Notes, and $2.4 million for the 2016 Notes and 2021 Notes.
The debt discounts are amortized over the lives of the
associated Notes using the effective interest method.
The aggregate net proceeds from the offering in February 2010
were $1,484.8 million after deducting the debt discount as
well as an underwriting discount of $11.9 million. Total
deferred financing costs associated with the issuance of these
senior notes were $14.4 million, including the
$11.9 million underwriting discount and $2.5 million
of legal and accounting fees. The aggregate net proceeds from
the offering in December 2010 were $791.6 million after
deducting the debt discount as well as underwriting discounts of
$6.0 million. Total deferred financing costs were
$7.4 million, including the $6.0 million underwriting
discount and $1.4 million of legal and accounting fees.
At December 31, 2010, the unamortized issuance costs for
the Senior Notes were $12.7 million for the February 2010
offering, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 6.8 years, and $7.4 million for the
December 2010 offering, which are expected to be recognized over
a weighted average period of 7.7 years. The Company
recognized aggregate interest expense, net of hedging
transactions, of $65.3 million and $1.6 million for
the February 2010 offering and December 2010 offering,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010 based on
the effective interest rates of 3.39%, 4.47%, 3.53%, 6.03%, and
5.06% for the 2013, 2015, 2016, 2020 and 2021 Notes,
respectively, with interest payments due semi-annually.
The Company, at its option, may redeem the Notes (prior to
October 15, 2020 for the 2021 Notes) in whole or in part at
any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% of
the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed and the sum of
the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of the
notes to be redeemed discounted on a semi-annual basis at a
treasury rate equal to a comparable United States Treasury Issue
at the redemption date plus 25 basis points for the 2016
Notes, 30 basis points for the 2013 Notes, the 2015 Notes,
and the 2021 Notes, and 35 basis points for the 2020 Notes,
plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption,
if any. Commencing on October 15, 2020, the Company may
redeem the 2021 Notes, in whole or in part, at any time, at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest through
the redemption date. Upon the occurrence of a change of control
of the Company that results in a downgrade of the notes below an
investment grade rating, the indenture requires under certain
circumstances that the Company makes an offer to purchase then
outstanding Senior Notes equal to 101% of the principal amount
plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
76
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The indentures governing the Senior Notes contain certain
covenants that, among other things, limit the Companys
ability to create or incur certain liens and engage in sale and
leaseback transactions. In addition, the indenture limits the
Companys ability to consolidate, merge, sell, convey,
transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all
of its property and assets. These covenants are subject to
certain exceptions and qualifications.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
entered into forward interest rate swap agreements for a
notional amount totaling $1,500.0 million for a certain
part of Senior Notes issuances. These agreements were to hedge
the variability in future probable interest payments
attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate from the
date the Company entered into the forward interest rate swap
agreements to the date the Company issued the Senior Notes.
These agreements effectively hedged a series of semi-annual
future interest payments to the fixed interest rates for
forecasted debt issuances. The Company recorded total proceeds
of $4.3 million from the forward interest rate swaps in
accumulated other comprehensive income, which will be
reclassified to interest expense in the same period during which
the hedged transactions affect interest expense.
The entire net proceeds from the 2013, 2015, and 2020 Notes
offering in February 2010 were used to repay the outstanding
balance of term loan A and term loan B, together with the net of
tax proceeds from the sale of our 50% ownership stake in the
Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies Instruments joint
venture and selected assets and liabilities directly
attributable to the joint venture, and cash on hand. The net
proceeds from the 2016 and 2021 Notes offering in December 2010
will be used for general corporate purposes, which may include
the repayment of existing indebtedness.
The
Credit Agreement
In November 2008, the Company entered into a
$2,650.0 million credit agreement (the Credit Agreement)
consisting of a revolving credit facility of
$250.0 million, a term loan A facility of
$1,400.0 million, and a term loan B facility of
$1,000.0 million to fund a portion of the cash
consideration paid for the AB merger. During February 2010, the
Company used the proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Notes,
the net of tax proceeds from the sale of its 50% ownership stake
in the Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies
Instruments joint venture and selected assets and liabilities
directly attributable to the joint venture, along with cash on
hand to pay off the entire outstanding term loan principal of
$1,972.5 million, which consisted of the carrying value of
$1,330.0 million of term loan A and $642.5 million of
term loan B, plus respective accrued interest due on the date of
repayment. The Company recognized a loss of $54.2 million
on unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the
repayments of term loan A and term loan B during the year ended
December 31, 2010. After the repayment of the term loans,
the Credit Agreement was amended and restated related to the
revolving credit facility. For details on the revolving credit
facility, refer to Note 4 Lines of Credit.
The Company entered into interest rate swaps with a
$1,000.0 million notional amount in January 2009 to convert
a portion of variable rate interest payments of term loan A to
fixed rate interest payments. As a result of the repayment of
term loan A in February 2010, the Company de-designated and
terminated the interest rate swaps in accordance with ASC
Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, as the underlying
transaction was no longer probable of occurring. The Company
recognized a $12.9 million loss in conjunction with the
termination of the interest rate swaps during the year ended
December 31, 2010.
The contractual interest rates the Company made the interest
payments on from the inception of the loan to the date of
retirement were from 2.75% to 3.91% on term loan A based on
LIBOR plus 2.5%, and from 5.25% to 6.00% on term loan B based on
the base rate plus 2.0%. The Company recognized aggregate
interest expense, net of hedging transactions, of
$11.0 million and $113.8 million during the years
ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Company recognized aggregate interest expense on the term loans,
net of hedging transactions, of $12.8 million.
77
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Convertible
Senior Notes
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted a
bifurcation requirement prescribed by ASC Topic
470-20, Debt
with Conversion and Other Options, with retrospective
application for our then outstanding $1,150.0 million of
Convertible Senior Notes, which consisted of $350.0 million
related to the 2% Convertible Senior Note (2023 Note),
$450.0 million related to the
11/2% Convertible
Senior Note (2024 Note) and $350.0 million related to the
31/4% Convertible
Senior Note (2025 Note). Upon adoption of the provision, the
Company retroactively recognized the carrying amount of
$100.0 million, $129.8 million, and $47.6 million
for the equity components of the 2023, 2024 and 2025 Notes,
respectively, with deferred tax impacts of $39.1 million,
$50.7 million and $18.6 million for the 2023, 2024 and
2025 Notes, respectively, and a liability component classified
in long-term debt of $250.0 million, $320.2 million
and $302.4 million for the 2023, 2024 and 2025 Notes,
respectively. The terms of the 2023 Notes, 2024 Notes, and 2025
Notes require the Company to settle the par value of such notes
in cash and deliver shares only for the excess, if any, of the
notes conversion value based on conversion prices of
$34.12, $51.02, and $49.13 per share, respectively, over their
par values.
At December 31, 2010, the Company carried unamortized debt
discounts of $21.6 million and $4.6 million for the
2024 and 2025 Notes, respectively, which are expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year. At
December 31, 2009 the Company carried unamortized debt
discounts of $10.4 million, $40.4 million and
$13.5 million for the 2023, 2024 and 2025 Notes,
respectively. The Company recognized total interest cost of
$60.2 million, $67.9 million, and $65.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively, based on the effective interest rates of 7.21%,
6.10% and 5.95% for the 2023, 2024 and 2025 Notes, respectively.
The interest expense consisted of $22.2 million,
$25.1 million, and $25.1 million of contractual
interest based on the stated coupon rate and $38.0 million,
$42.8 million and $40.2 million of amortization of the
discount on the liability component for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Costs incurred to issue the convertible senior notes totaled
$7.6 million for the
31/4% Notes,
$9.3 million for the Old
11/2% Notes,
and $9.3 million for the Old 2% Notes. Finance costs
(excluding legal and accounting fees) incurred to conduct the
exchange of the Old Notes totaled $1.8 million
($0.8 million related to the Old 2% Notes and
$1.0 million related to the Old
11/2% Notes).
These costs have been deferred and included in other assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets and amortized over the terms of
the respective debt using the effective interest method. In
conjunction with the adoption of the bifurcation provision, the
Company applied the guidance to the Companys debt issuance
costs. As a result, the Company allocated the underlying
issuance costs associated with the Convertible Senior Notes to
equity in the same ratio as when determining the appropriate
debt discount. The Company allocated $6.9 million to equity with
a deferred tax impact of $2.7 million, and reduced the
amount of the debt issuance costs by $6.9 million. At
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the unamortized balances of the
issuance costs were $1.8 million and $4.6 million,
respectively.
The indenture allowed holders of our 2023 Notes to require the
Company to purchase all or a portion of the 2023 Notes at par
plus accrued and unpaid interest at the earliest on
August 1, 2010 and it also permitted the Company to redeem,
in whole or in part, the 2023 Notes at the Companys option
on or after August 1, 2010. During July 2010, the Company
notified the holders of 2023 Notes its intention to redeem all
of the outstanding 2023 Notes on August 6, 2010 at par
value. In response to the Companys announcement and prior
to the August 6, 2010 redemption date, Note holders holding
a total principal value of $347.8 million exercised their
option to exercise the redemption and conversion feature. As a
result, total cash consideration of $347.8 million and
2.4 million shares of the Companys common stock was
issued to settle the par value and the excess of the Notes
conversion value based on a conversion price of $34.12 per
share. On August 6, 2010, the Company redeemed all of the
remaining outstanding 2023 Notes for cash at par value. The
amortization of debt discount and the issuance cost for the 2023
Notes was completed in July 2010, commensurate with the holder
conversion option date. The Company did not recognize any gain
or loss on the settlement of the 2023 Notes.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company reclassified the
carrying value of the 2025 Notes from long-term debt to current
liabilities according to the respective indenture, which allows
our holders of the 2025 Notes to
78
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
require the Company to purchase all or a portion of the 2025
Notes at par plus any accrued and unpaid interest at the
earliest on June 15, 2011. In the event that the holders do
not exercise such rights, the remaining balance of the 2025
Notes will be reclassified back to long-term debt. The indenture
also permits the Company to redeem, in whole or in part, the
2025 Notes at the Companys option on or after
June 15, 2011.
The Company issued the 2023 Notes in August 2003, the 2024 Notes
in February 2004, and the 2025 Notes in June 2005.
In June, 2005, the Company sold the 2025 Notes to certain
qualified institutional investors at par value. Including the
exercise of the over-allotment option, the total size of the
offering was $350.0 million. After expenses, net proceeds
to the Company were $343.0 million. Interest is payable on
the 2025 Notes semi-annually. In addition to the coupon interest
of 3.25%, additional interest of 0.225% of the market value of
the 2025 Notes may be required to be paid per six-month period
beginning June 15, 2011, if the market value of the 2025
Notes during a specified period is 120% or more of the 2025
Notes principal value. The holders of the 2025 Notes may
require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the 2025
Notes for 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest, on June 15, 2011, 2015 and 2020 or upon
the occurrence of certain fundamental changes. Prepayment of
amounts due under the 2025 Notes will be accelerated in the
event of bankruptcy or insolvency and may be accelerated by the
trustee or holders of 25% of the 2025 Notes principal
value upon default of payment of principal or interest when due
for over thirty days, the Companys default on its
conversion or repurchase obligations, the failure of the Company
to comply with any of its other agreements in the 2025 Notes or
indenture, or upon cross-default by the Company or a significant
subsidiary for failure to make a payment at maturity or the
acceleration of other debt of the Company or a significant
subsidiary, in either case exceeding $50.0 million. The
terms of the 2025 Notes require the Company to settle the par
value of the 2025 Notes in cash and deliver shares only for the
excess, if any, of the conversion value (based on a conversion
price of $49.13) over the par value.
In February 2004 and August 2003, the Company issued
$450.0 million principal amount of the 2024 Notes (the Old
2024 Notes) due February 15, 2024 and $350.0 million
principal amount of the 2023 Convertible Senior Notes (the Old
2023 Notes) due August 1, 2023 to certain qualified
institutional buyers, respectively. After expenses, the Company
received net proceeds of $440.1 million and
$340.7 million for the Old 2024 Notes and Old 2023 Notes,
respectively. Interest on the Old Notes was payable
semi-annually. In addition to the coupon interest of
11/2%
and 2%, additional interest of 0.35% of the market value of the
Old Notes may have been required to be paid beginning
February 15, 2012 and August 1, 2010, if the market
value of the Old Notes during specified testing periods was 120%
or more of the principal value, for the Old 2024 Notes and the
Old 2023 Notes. This contingent interest feature was an embedded
derivative with a de minimis value, to which no value had been
assigned at issuance of either of the Old Notes or subsequently.
The Old Notes were issued at 100% of principal value, and were
convertible into shares of common stock at the option of the
holder, subject to certain conditions described below, at a
price of $51.02 and $34.12 per share for the Old 2024 Notes and
Old 2023 Notes, respectively. The Old Notes were to be redeemed,
in whole or in part, at the Companys option on or after
February 15, 2012 (for the Old 2024 Notes) and
August 1, 2010 (for the Old 2023 Notes) at 100% of the
principal amount. In addition, the holders of the Old Notes may
have required the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the
Old Notes for 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued
interest, on three separate dates per their issuance agreement.
The Old Notes also contained restricted convertibility features
that did not affect the conversion price of the notes but,
instead, placed restrictions on the holders ability to
convert their notes into shares of the Companys common
stock (conversion shares). Holders were able to convert their
Old Notes into shares of the Companys common stock prior
to stated maturity.
During December 2004, the Company offered up to
$350.0 million and $450.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 2% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (the New
2023 Notes) and 2024 Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the New
2024 Notes), respectively, in a non-cash exchange for any and
all outstanding balance, that were validly tendered on that
date. Approximately 99% or $446.5 million of the Old 2024
Notes have been exchanged by their holders for New 2024 Notes as
of December 31, 2010. The New 2024 Notes carry the same
rights and attributes as the Old 2024 Notes except for the
following: the terms of the New 2024 Notes require the Company
to settle the par value of such notes in cash and deliver shares
only for the excess, if any, of the notes conversion value
79
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
(based on a conversion price of $51.02) over their par values.
As such, the Company uses the treasury stock equivalent method
to calculate diluted earnings per share, as if the New 2024
Notes were outstanding since date of issuance, the date the Old
2024 Notes were issued.
In the event of a change of control of the Company, the holders
of the 2025 Notes, the Old 2024 Notes and the New 2024 Notes
each have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or
a portion of their notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the notes plus all accrued and unpaid
interest.
Secured
Loan
The Company held auction rate securities with UBS Investment
Bank (UBS). However, beginning in February 2008, a significant
number of auction transactions failed because sell orders
exceeded buy orders. As a result of the failed auctions, the
Company held illiquid securities because the funds associated
with these failed auctions will not be accessible until the
issuer calls the security, a successful auction occurs, a buyer
is found outside of the auction process, or the security
matures. To respond to the matter, UBS announced that it has
agreed to a settlement in principle with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) and other state regulatory agencies
represented by North American Securities Administrators
Association to restore liquidity to all remaining clients who
held auction rate securities. Consequently, in November 2008,
UBS loaned $35.6 million in cash to the Company which
equaled the par value of the auction rate securities the Company
held at that time, without recourse, and with the auction rate
securities serving as collateral with interest charges accruing
at the same rate as the yields earned on the underlying
securities. In July 2010, the Company settled the entire
remaining outstanding principal balance of $29.0 million of
auction rate securities the Company held with UBS, plus interest
earned thereon, with the $29.0 million of loan principal
balance outstanding with UBS plus interest accrued thereon. The
Company did not recognize any net gain or loss in association
with this settlement. For information on auction rate
securities, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
6.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Operating
Leases
The Company leases certain equipment and office and
manufacturing facilities under operating leases, which expire
through December 2048. Certain rental commitments provide for
escalating rental payments and certain commitments have renewal
options extending through various years. Rent expense under
operating leases was $49.7 million, $56.4 million and
$24.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Sublease income totaled
$1.2 million, $2.9 million and $1.3 million for
the years ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Future minimum lease commitments and sublease rentals for
operating leases at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Sublease
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Rentals
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
43,331
|
|
|
$
|
1,071
|
|
|
$
|
42,260
|
|
2012
|
|
|
35,420
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
34,633
|
|
2013
|
|
|
28,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,487
|
|
2014
|
|
|
24,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,544
|
|
2015
|
|
|
19,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,451
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
101,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
252,375
|
|
|
$
|
1,858
|
|
|
$
|
250,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Guarantees
The Company is a guarantor of a pension plan benefit that was
assumed in conjunction with the AB merger, that is accounted for
under the ASC Topic 460, Guarantees. As part of the
divestiture of the Analytical Instruments business in 1999 by
AB, the purchaser of the Analytical Instruments business has
agreed to pay for the pension benefits for employees of a former
German subsidiary. However, the Company was required to
guarantee payment of these pension benefits should the purchaser
fail to do so, as these payment obligations were not
transferable to the buyer under German law. The guaranteed
payment obligation is approximately at $54.4 million at
December 31, 2010, which is not expected to have a material
adverse effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, we enter into some agreements
under which we indemnify third-parties for intellectual property
infringement claims or claims arising from breaches of
representations or warranties. In addition, from time to time,
we provide indemnity protection to third-parties for claims
relating to past performance arising from undisclosed
liabilities, product liabilities, environmental obligations,
representations and warranties, and other claims. In these
agreements, the scope and amount of remedy, or the period in
which claims can be made, may be limited. It is not possible to
determine the maximum potential amount of future payments, if
any, due under these indemnities due to the conditional nature
of the obligations and the unique facts and circumstances
involved in each agreement. Historically, payments made related
to these indemnifications have not been material to our
consolidated financial position.
Licensing
and Purchasing Agreements
The Company develops, manufactures and sells certain products
under several licensing and purchasing agreements. The licensing
agreements require royalty payments based upon various
percentages of sales or profits from the products. Terms of the
licensing agreements generally range from the remaining life of
the patent up to 20 years and initial costs are amortized
over periods from seven to ten years, not to exceed their terms,
using various methods, including the straight-line method. To
maintain exclusivity, certain of the licensing agreements
require guaranteed minimum annual royalty payments. Total
royalty expense was $87.1 million, $85.2 million and
$38.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company also has purchase
agreements, which expire on various dates through 2013, under
which it is obligated to purchase a minimum amount of raw
materials and finished goods each year through the expiration of
the contracts and certain capital expenditure commitments.
Future minimum guaranteed royalties and unconditional purchase
obligations at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
58,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
7,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters
of Credit
The Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling
$36.7 million at December 31, 2010, of which
$10.7 million was to support liabilities associated with
the Companys self-insured workers compensation
81
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
programs, $3.4 million was to support its building lease
requirements, $18.9 million was to support performance bond
agreements, and $3.7 million was to support duty on
imported products.
Executive
Employment Agreements
The Company has employment contracts with key executives that
provide for the continuation of salary if terminated for reasons
other than cause, as defined in those agreements. At
December 31, 2010, future employment contract commitments
for such key executives were approximately $35.6 million.
In certain circumstances, the employment agreements call for the
acceleration of equity vesting. Those figures are not reflected
in the above information.
Acquisition-Related
Contingent Obligations
The Company may have future payment obligations due to the
contingent consideration arrangements agreed to between the
Company and the respective sellers in conjunction with business
combinations entered into during the current and prior years.
Such payments are based on certain technological milestones,
patent milestones or the achievement of targeted sales
milestones. According to the ASC Topic 805, Business
Combinations, the Company records these obligations at fair
value at the time of acquisition with subsequent fair value
adjustments to the contingent consideration reflected in the
line items of the Consolidated Statement of Operations
commensurate with the nature of the contingent consideration. At
December 31, 2010 and 2009, $263.3 million and
$8.8 million, respectively, of contingent consideration
liabilities are included in other long-term
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the
year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded a
reduction to cost of revenues for fair value adjustments
identified during the period associated with contingent
consideration liabilities of $6.3 million. The Company did
not record any such adjustments during the year ended
December 31, 2009. For the acquisitions the Company
accounted for as asset purchases, contingent consideration
liabilities are recorded and become an additional element of
cost of the acquired assets when the contingency is resolved.
During each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, $1.7 million of the contingent
payments were earned and expensed. Some acquisitions do not
limit the maximum payment amount, nor restrict the payment
deadlines. For more information on our business combination
accounting, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Environmental
Liabilities
As a result of previous mergers and acquisitions, the Company
assumed certain environmental exposure liabilities. At
December 31, 2010, aggregate undiscounted environmental
reserves were $8.0 million, including current reserves of
$4.2 million. Based upon currently available information,
the Company believes that it has adequately provided for these
environmental exposures and that the outcome of these matters
will not have a material adverse effect on its Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
Intellectual
Properties
The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings
of a nature considered normal to its business, including
protection of its owned and licensed intellectual property. The
Company accrues for such contingencies when it is probable that
a liability is incurred and the amount can be reasonably
estimated. These accruals are adjusted periodically as
assessments change or additional information becomes available.
Specific contingent liabilities for royalty obligations related
to acquired businesses have been recorded on the Companys
consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2010.
Litigation
The Company is subject to other potential liabilities under
government regulations and various claims and legal actions that
are pending or may be asserted. These matters have arisen in the
ordinary course and conduct of
82
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
the Companys business, as well as through acquisitions and
some are expected to be covered, at least partly, by insurance.
Claim estimates that are probable and can be reasonably
estimated are reflected as liabilities of the Company. The
ultimate resolution of these matters is subject to many
uncertainties. It is reasonably possible that some of the
matters, which are pending or may be asserted, could be decided
unfavorably to the Company. Although the amount of liability at
December 31, 2010, with respect to these matters cannot be
ascertained, the Company believes that any resulting liability
would not materially affect the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The differences between the United States federal statutory tax
rate and the Companys effective tax rate are as follows
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Statutory United States federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income tax
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Foreign earnings taxed at
non-United
States rates
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
Repatriation of other foreign earnings, net of related benefits
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
53.7
|
|
Benefits from global restructuring activities
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credits and incentives
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
Audit settlements
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Non-deductible in-process research and development
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on accruals
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income summarized by region for the years ended December
31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
111,805
|
|
|
$
|
(175,020
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,842
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
329,747
|
|
|
|
369,566
|
|
|
|
153,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax income
|
|
$
|
441,552
|
|
|
$
|
194,546
|
|
|
$
|
112,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following for
the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
90,153
|
|
|
$
|
111,557
|
|
|
$
|
27,064
|
|
State
|
|
|
22,046
|
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
126,014
|
|
|
|
87,777
|
|
|
|
37,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision
|
|
|
238,213
|
|
|
|
204,978
|
|
|
|
67,899
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(147,756
|
)
|
|
|
(114,041
|
)
|
|
|
53,447
|
|
State
|
|
|
(23,397
|
)
|
|
|
(7,077
|
)
|
|
|
(862
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(5,352
|
)
|
|
|
(8,682
|
)
|
|
|
(9,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision
|
|
|
(176,505
|
)
|
|
|
(129,800
|
)
|
|
|
42,851
|
|
Changes in tax rate
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(5,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in valuation allowance
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
(19,825
|
)
|
|
|
(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision
|
|
$
|
63,694
|
|
|
$
|
49,952
|
|
|
$
|
107,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
and liabilities are composed of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax loss and other carryforwards
|
|
$
|
93,794
|
|
|
$
|
102,641
|
|
Inventory adjustments
|
|
|
29,599
|
|
|
|
33,266
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
134,501
|
|
|
|
77,868
|
|
Postretirement obligations
|
|
|
140,642
|
|
|
|
152,490
|
|
Capitalized research and development
|
|
|
72,652
|
|
|
|
101,613
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
15,181
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
486,369
|
|
|
|
470,510
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(21,956
|
)
|
|
|
(18,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
464,413
|
|
|
|
451,815
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(714,784
|
)
|
|
|
(848,441
|
)
|
Unremitted earnings
|
|
|
(44,901
|
)
|
|
|
(65,073
|
)
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(31,439
|
)
|
|
|
(11,886
|
)
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
(115,406
|
)
|
|
|
(144,150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(906,530
|
)
|
|
|
(1,069,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(442,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(617,735
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes clarifies the accounting for
uncertain tax positions and prescribes a comprehensive model for
how companies should recognize, measure, present and disclose in
their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken on a tax return. Under the topic, tax
benefits shall initially be recognized in the financial
statements when it is more likely than not the position will be
sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax
positions shall initially, and subsequently, be measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority,
assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.
Disclosure requirements are also revised to include an annual
tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits.
The following table summarizes the activity related to our
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1
|
|
$
|
121,644
|
|
|
$
|
74,904
|
|
|
$
|
27,784
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
76,071
|
|
|
|
32,997
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(21,155
|
)
|
|
|
(3,772
|
)
|
|
|
(1,293
|
)
|
Increases in tax positions for current year relating to ongoing
operations
|
|
|
9,765
|
|
|
|
10,316
|
|
|
|
5,981
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for current year relating to ongoing
operations
|
|
|
(16,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in tax positions as a result of a lapse in statute of
limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in tax positions for current year relating to
acquisition
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
18,529
|
|
|
|
46,200
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior year relating to acquisition
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior year relating to acquisition
|
|
|
(13,908
|
)
|
|
|
(11,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases in tax positions due to settlements with taxing
authorities
|
|
|
(4,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31
|
|
$
|
152,697
|
|
|
$
|
121,644
|
|
|
$
|
74,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the gross uncertain tax benefits balance at
December 31, 2010 are $48.8 million of tax deductions
for which there is uncertainty only regarding the timing of the
tax benefit. In the event these deductions are deferred
84
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
to a later period, it would accelerate the payment of cash to
the taxing authority. Other than potential interest and
penalties, such deferral would have no impact on tax expense. Of
the $152.7 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits,
$80.8 million, if recognized, would reduce our income tax
expense and effective tax rate. Included in the
$80.8 million is $1.6 million of gross uncertain tax
benefits associated with current year acquisitions that would
reduce our income tax expense and effective tax rate only if
recognized after the applicable measurement period as described
in ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations.
The Company has resolved the United States federal tax audit of
certain acquired company pre-acquisition tax years. As a result
of the examination, the Company released approximately
$11.4 million of acquired tax reserves through income tax
expense.
In accordance with the disclosure requirements as described in
ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, the Company has classified
uncertain tax positions as non-current income tax liabilities
unless expected to be paid in one year. The Companys
continuing practice is to recognize interest
and/or
penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, the Company recognized approximately $6.1 million,
$7.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in
interest and penalties in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. The Company had approximately $15.8 million for
the payment of interest and penalties accrued at
December 31, 2010 in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
compared to $9.8 million accrued at December 31, 2009.
It is reasonably possible that there will be a reduction to the
balance of unrecognized tax benefits of up to $24.6 million
in the next twelve months due to United States federal,
Connecticut, Massachusetts and United Kingdom audit settlements
expected in 2011. The reduction is primarily attributable to
agreements with taxing authorities on positions involving
inventory capitalization, amortization and depreciation.
The United States federal audit cycle covering the
consolidated income tax returns for the years ended 2006 and
2007 is expected to be completed in 2011. In November 2010, the
Internal Revenue Service started its
2008-2009
federal audit cycle. After the United States federal
examinations of the 2006 through 2009 tax years conclude, the
remaining year subject to federal examination will be 2010. The
remaining years subject to state examination are 2006 through
2010.
The Company is subject to routine compliance reviews on various
tax matters around the world in the ordinary course of business.
Currently, income tax audits are in underway Canada, Italy,
Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Years
open, and therefore subject to tax examination, in the foreign
jurisdictions are 2006 through 2010. The impact on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is not anticipated to be
material.
The Company had provided for United States deferred tax
liabilities associated with the earnings of foreign acquired
subsidiaries as part of the acquisition of Applied Biosystems,
Inc. in November of 2008. With the exception of these acquired
earnings and these entities earnings generated in 2009,
the Company maintains the position that all other foreign
earnings are to be indefinitely reinvested. While the Company
has provided $44.9 million of taxes related to the acquired
foreign unremitted earnings that are to be repatriated, taxes on
approximately $459.8 million of other undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries have not been provided for at
December 31, 2010. Management considers the various cash
requirements in the United States, the tax impact of
repatriating each subsidiarys earnings and the reasonably
anticipated working capital needs of the foreign subsidiaries in
determining the Companys reinvestment policy. It is not
practicable to determine the amount of deferred income taxes
payable in the event we change our assertion and decide to
repatriate all unremitted foreign earnings in the future.
Under ASC Topic 718, CompensationEquity
Compensation, the fair value of share-based compensation is
required to be recognized as an expense, and the tax benefit
associated with such compensation will continue to be credited
to additional
paid-in-capital,
but only to the extent the excess tax benefits have not already
been recognized in the Statement of Operations. The excess tax
benefit associated with employee stock plans were estimated to
reduce income taxes payable by $21.1 million,
$13.9 million and $2.4 million for 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
85
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
At December 31, 2010, the Company had $119.8 million,
$50.9 million and $24.1 million of federal, state and
foreign net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, respectively,
that were obtained from acquired companies throughout the years.
There were also state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of
$50.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The
federal and state NOL carryforwards begin to expire in 2019.
Approximately $0.2 million of the foreign NOL carryforwards
begin to expire in 2015, while the remainder carries forward
indefinitely. Federal tax credit carryforwards begin to expire
in 2012 and state tax credits carry forward indefinitely.
The Company also had federal, state and foreign capital loss
carryforwards of $43.8 million, $305.2 million and
$0.5 million, respectively. Federal and state capital loss
carryforwards begin to expire in 2012; foreign capital losses
carry forward indefinitely. All of these capital losses are
fully offset by a valuation allowance due to uncertainty
surrounding the future taxable capital gain income in the
foreseeable future. An additional valuation allowance of
$2.1 million was recorded against certain deferred tax
assets related to increased capital losses realized, but not yet
recognized for tax purposes on capital investments.
Due to the change of ownership provision of the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, utilization of the Companys net
operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to an
annual limitation against taxable income in future periods. As a
result of any future ownership changes, the annual limitation
under IRC § 382 and § 383 may expire before
ultimately becoming available to reduce future income tax
liabilities.
The Company continues to benefit from reduced tax rates in
Singapore and Israel. Singapores taxing authority granted
the Company pioneer company status which provides an incentive
encouraging companies to undertake activities that have the
effect of promoting economic or technological development in
Singapore. This incentive equates to a tax exemption on earnings
associated with the Companys manufacturing activities and
continues through June 30, 2014. The Company qualifies for
an incentive tax benefit in Israel which provides for a reduced
3.5% tax rate on earnings from its subsidiary in Israel. This
incentive has been granted for an indefinite period given
minimum sales and investment levels are maintained. The impact
of the tax holiday in Singapore decreased Singapore taxes by
$21.2 million, $20.1 million and $0.6 million for
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As residual United States
deferred tax liabilities were provided on the 2008 and 2009
earnings of Singapore, income tax expense was reduced only for
the 2010 reduction in Singapore taxes. The impact of the tax
holiday in Israel decreased both taxes paid and income tax
expense by $1.5 million, $1.0 million and
$0.8 million for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
COMMON
STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
PLAN
|
Common
Stock Authorized Shares
The Company has authorized 400 million shares of common
stock.
Preferred
Stock Authorized Shares
The Company has authorized 6,405,884 shares of preferred
stock of which no shares were outstanding at December 31,
2010 and 2009. Upon issuance, the Company has the ability to
define the terms of the preferred shares, including voting
rights, liquidation preferences, conversion and redemption
provisions and dividend rates.
Preferred
Stock Purchase Rights Plan
The Company has a Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Plan under
which stockholders received one right to purchase
one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Preferred Stock
for each outstanding share of common stock held of record at the
close of business on March 30, 2001. The rights, which will
initially trade with the common stock, become exercisable to
purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Preferred
Stock, at $250.00 per right, when a person acquires 15% or more
of the Companys common stock or announces a tender offer
that could result in such person owning 15% or more of the
common stock. Each one one-hundredth of a share of Series B
Preferred
86
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Stock has terms designed to make it substantially the economic
equivalent of one share of common stock. Prior to a person
acquiring 15%, the rights can be redeemed for $0.001 each by
action of the Board of Directors. Under certain circumstances,
if a person acquires 15% or more of the common stock, the rights
permit the Company stockholders other than the acquirer to
purchase the Companys common stock having a market value
of twice the exercise price of the rights, in lieu of the
Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, in the event of
certain business combinations, the rights permit purchase of the
common stock of an acquirer at a 50% discount. Rights held by
the acquirer will become null and void in both cases. The rights
expire on April 1, 2011. The rights distribution will not
be taxable to stockholders.
Stock
Repurchase Program
In December 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
a program (the December 2010 program), authorizing management to
repurchase up to $500.0 million of common stock. As of
December 31, 2010, no shares were purchased under the
December 2010 program.
In July 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
program (the July 2010 program) authorizing management to
repurchase up to $520.0 million of common stock over the
next two years. During the year ended December 31, 2010,
the Company repurchased 8.4 million shares at a total cost
of $436.6 million under the July 2010 program. The cost of
repurchased shares is included in treasury stock and reported as
a reduction in total equity when a repurchase occurs.
In July 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
program (the July 2007 program) authorizing management to
repurchase up to $500.0 million of common stock, of which
$265.0 million was not used to purchase shares. This
program expired in July 2010. No shares were repurchased under
this program in 2009 and 2010. The cost of repurchased shares
were included in treasury stock and reported as a reduction in
total equity.
The Companys employee stock plan, further discussed in
Note 10 Employee Stock Plans, allows for
certain net share settlement of stock awards. The Company
accounts for the net share settlement withholding as a treasury
share repurchase transaction.
|
|
9.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
|
401(k)
Profit Sharing Plans
In December 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
the merger of the Employee 401(k) Savings Plan of Applied
Biosystems, Inc. (the AB Plan) into the Invitrogen
Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan (the
Invitrogen Plan). Effective January 1, 2010,
the surviving Plan (the Invitrogen Plan) was renamed the Life
Technologies Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan. The
Company may make matching contributions in amounts as determined
by the Board of Directors. The Life Technologies Plan allows
each eligible employee to voluntarily make pre-tax deferred
salary contributions subject to regulatory and plan limitations.
For each dollar a participant contributes up to 6% of their
salary, the plan offers a 75% match. The Company made matching
contributions of $22.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010 to the Life Technologies Corporation
401(k) Savings and Investment Plan. Prior to the merger of
Invitrogen Plan and AB Plan, the Invitrogen Plan allowed each
eligible employee to voluntarily make pre-tax deferred salary
contributions subject to regulatory and plan limitations. During
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company
made matching contributions of $5.6 million and
$5.1 million respectively, to the Invitrogen Plan. The
Company assumed the AB Plan in conjunction with its merger with
Applied Biosystems in 2008. The AB Plan covered domestic
employees that were employed by Applied Biosystems prior to its
merger and new hires of the Company post merger who worked for
legacy Applied Biosystems offices until transferring the AB plan
into the Invitrogen Plan in January 2010. During the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the plan offered a
dollar-for-dollar
matching of up to 6% salary contributions, and the Company made
matching contributions of $14.7 million and
$1.2 million, respectively.
87
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Pension
and Postretirement Plans
The Company is required to recognize the overfunded or
underfunded status of a defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its Consolidated
Balance Sheets and to recognize changes in that funded status in
the year in which the changes occur through other comprehensive
income. The Company is also required to measure the funded
status of a plan as of the date of its fiscal year-end for which
consolidated financial statements are presented.
The Company assumed the Applied Biosystems qualified
pension plan, non-qualified supplemental benefit plans, and
postretirement benefit plans upon the merger with Applied
Biosystems. The qualified pension plan covers a portion of
former Applied Biosystems worldwide employees. Pension
benefits earned are generally based on years of service and
compensation during active employment. The Company also sponsors
nonqualified supplemental benefit plans for select domestic
employees who were hired by Applied Biosystems prior to
July 1, 1999. The accrual of future service benefits for
all participants was frozen as of June 30, 2004. Benefits
earned under the plan will be paid out under the plan
provisions. These supplemental plans are unfunded, however,
Applied Biosystems prior to its acquisition had established a
rabbi trust, through which the assets may be used to pay
non-qualified plan benefits. The rabbi trust assets are subject
to the claims of the Companys creditors in the event of
the Companys insolvency. Plan participants are general
creditors of the Company with respect to these benefits. The
value of the assets held by these trusts, included in restricted
cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was $18.2 million
at December 31, 2010. The assumed postretirement benefit
plans are unfunded, however, its partially funded by
insurance policies. The plan provides healthcare and life
insurance benefits to domestic employees who retire under the
domestic pension plan provisions and satisfy certain service and
age requirements. In addition, employees hired prior to
January 1, 1993 also receive subsidized retirement medical
benefits. Generally, medical coverage pays a stated percentage
of most medical expenses, and in some cases, participants pay a
co-payment. Benefits are reduced for any deductible and for
payments made by Medicare or other group coverage. The Company
shares the cost of providing these benefits with retirees.
The Company also has a qualified pension plan for substantially
all United States employees that were employed by Life
Technologies Inc. prior to its acquisition by the Company in
September 2000. The domestic pension plan provides benefits that
are generally based upon a percentage of the employees
highest average compensation in any consecutive five-year period
in the ten years before retirement. The Company froze this plan
effective December 31, 2001. The Company will continue to
administer the plan but benefits will no longer accrue. The
Company also sponsors nonqualified supplementary retirement
plans for certain former senior management of Life Technologies
Inc. and Dexter Corp., which were acquired in 2000. The Company
has life insurance policies on the lives of participants
designed to provide sufficient funds to materially recover all
costs of the plans. In addition to the above plans, the Company
sponsors nonqualified executive supplemental plans for certain
former senior managers of Dexter and Life Technologies Inc. that
provide for a target benefit based upon a percentage of the
average annual compensation during the highest five consecutive
years of the last ten years before retirement, which benefit is
then combined with other work related benefits payable to the
participant. These nonqualified supplementary retirement plans
and nonqualified executive supplemental plans are unfunded. The
Company also administers the Dexter Postretirement Health and
Benefit Program (the Dexter PRMB Plan), which provides health
and life benefits to certain retired participants who are not
employees of the Company but were employees of Dexter prior to
the sale of their businesses and prior to the Companys
merger with Dexter. The Dexter PRMB Plan is fully funded.
The Company also provides a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan in which certain executives elect to defer compensation to
a future period. The Company holds assets and liabilities of
$28.6 million associated with the deferred compensation
plan, located on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in long term
other assets and other long term obligations.
The retirement benefits for most employees of foreign operations
are generally provided by government sponsored or insured
programs and, in certain countries, by defined benefit plans.
The Company has defined benefit
88
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
plans primarily for United Kingdom (U.K.), Germany, Netherlands,
Norway, and Japan employees. The Companys policy with
respect to the foreign pension plans is to fund amounts as
necessary on an actuarial basis to provide for benefits under
the pension plan in accordance with local laws and income tax
regulations. The pension plans generally provide benefits based
upon the employees final compensation basis or the
employees average base compensation over the terms
specified by the pension plans adjusted by number of years of
service or bonus, as necessary. A majority of the foreign
pension plans are frozen to additional members and for future
accrual of additional benefits for participants of the plan. The
Germany and Japan pension plans are unfunded plans with benefits
paid by the Company as needed.
The funded status of the Companys pension and
postretirement plans and amounts recognized at December 31,
2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Pension Plans
|
|
|
Foreign Pension Plans
|
|
|
Postretirement Plans
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
734,082
|
|
|
$
|
698,274
|
|
|
$
|
110,364
|
|
|
$
|
96,983
|
|
|
$
|
42,316
|
|
|
$
|
66,871
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
|
4,638
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
41,521
|
|
|
|
37,173
|
|
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,961
|
)
|
|
|
(18,297
|
)
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
40,731
|
|
|
|
61,305
|
|
|
|
3,521
|
|
|
|
(1,269
|
)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
(3,653
|
)
|
Curtailment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(1,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and administrative expenses paid
|
|
|
(45,548
|
)
|
|
|
(64,643
|
)
|
|
|
(3,486
|
)
|
|
|
(3,695
|
)
|
|
|
(8,164
|
)
|
|
|
(9,460
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(16,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare subsidies received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Plan transfer out due to divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
755,058
|
|
|
|
734,082
|
|
|
|
109,794
|
|
|
|
110,364
|
|
|
|
40,301
|
|
|
|
42,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
627,822
|
|
|
|
548,398
|
|
|
|
79,588
|
|
|
|
62,237
|
|
|
|
5,658
|
|
|
|
5,148
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
70,019
|
|
|
|
118,288
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
36,115
|
|
|
|
25,779
|
|
|
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
10,181
|
|
|
|
5,101
|
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
Benefits and administrative expenses paid
|
|
|
(45,548
|
)
|
|
|
(64,643
|
)
|
|
|
(3,486
|
)
|
|
|
(3,695
|
)
|
|
|
(8,164
|
)
|
|
|
(9,460
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(16,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare subsidies received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,154
|
)
|
|
|
5,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
671,635
|
|
|
|
627,822
|
|
|
|
87,321
|
|
|
|
79,588
|
|
|
|
6,127
|
|
|
|
5,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(83,423
|
)
|
|
|
(106,260
|
)
|
|
|
(22,473
|
)
|
|
|
(30,776
|
)
|
|
|
(34,174
|
)
|
|
|
(36,658
|
)
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
59,774
|
|
|
|
43,052
|
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
|
|
12,653
|
|
|
|
11,722
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,584
|
)
|
|
|
(17,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(22,488
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,989
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,005
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,221
|
|
|
$
|
7,211
|
|
|
$
|
1,465
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
|
(23,503
|
)
|
|
|
(1,713
|
)
|
|
|
(1,273
|
)
|
|
|
(5,059
|
)
|
|
|
(5,108
|
)
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(81,070
|
)
|
|
|
(82,757
|
)
|
|
|
(27,981
|
)
|
|
|
(36,714
|
)
|
|
|
(30,580
|
)
|
|
|
(31,885
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
|
|
|
60,935
|
|
|
|
44,271
|
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
|
|
(6,931
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(22,488
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,989
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,005
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(42,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
755,058
|
|
|
$
|
734,082
|
|
|
$
|
97,339
|
|
|
$
|
96,547
|
|
|
$
|
40,301
|
|
|
$
|
42,316
|
|
89
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The projected benefit obligations, accumulated benefit
obligations and fair values of plan assets for the pension and
postretirement plans with accumulated benefit obligations in
excess of plan assets at December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
Plans
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
755,058
|
|
|
$
|
734,082
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
78,797
|
|
|
$
|
35,640
|
|
|
$
|
36,993
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
755,058
|
|
|
|
734,082
|
|
|
|
21,634
|
|
|
|
73,796
|
|
|
|
35,640
|
|
|
|
36,993
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
671,635
|
|
|
|
627,822
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
43,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized
in other comprehensive income for the period ended
December 31, 2010, amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income at December 31, 2010 and the amounts
in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be
amortized into fiscal year 2011 net periodic benefit
expense are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
12,612
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
2,466
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,959
|
)
|
Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss)
|
|
|
4,110
|
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(1,536
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credit (cost)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
Effect of exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)
|
|
$
|
16,664
|
|
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic pension cost (income)
|
|
|
(3,386
|
)
|
|
|
6,224
|
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic and other comprehensive loss
(income)
|
|
$
|
13,278
|
|
|
$
|
5,545
|
|
|
$
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
59,774
|
|
|
$
|
5,092
|
|
|
$
|
12,653
|
|
Net prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
60,935
|
|
|
$
|
5,092
|
|
|
$
|
(6,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
1,749
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
Net prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be
amortized into fiscal year 2011 net periodic benefit
expense (credit)
|
|
$
|
1,807
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
(1,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The components of net periodic pension cost (income) for the
Companys pension and postretirement plans for the years
ended December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Pension Plans
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
41,521
|
|
|
|
37,173
|
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(41,900
|
)
|
|
|
(34,232
|
)
|
|
|
(6,687
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
1,909
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement (gain) loss
|
|
|
(5,473
|
)
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (income)
|
|
$
|
(3,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,753
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Pension Plans
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3,641
|
|
|
$
|
4,637
|
|
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
3,574
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4,073
|
)
|
|
|
(3,685
|
)
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Settlement cost
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment credit
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits and other
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
6,224
|
|
|
$
|
7,428
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Plans
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
3,481
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
3,982
|
|
|
$
|
4,353
|
|
|
$
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average assumptions used in accounting for the
pension and postretirement plans for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Discount rate to determine obligation
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
5.28
|
%
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
Discount rate to determine net benefit cost
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.28
|
%
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.00-8.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75-8.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.31
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses an actuarial measurement date of January 1 of
the current year to determine pension and other postretirement
benefit measurements as of December 31 of the current year. The
discount rate is the estimated rate at which the obligation for
pension benefits could effectively be settled using a yield
curve commensurate with the underlying cash flows of the plan.
The expected return on plan assets reflects the average rate of
earnings that the Company estimates to generate on the assets of
the plans using historical and forward looking expected returns.
91
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The rate of compensation increase reflects the Companys
best estimate of the future compensation levels of the
individual employees covered by the plans for those plans that
are still active.
Our asset investment goal is to achieve a long-term targeted
rate of return consistent with the ongoing nature of the
plans liabilities along with maintaining the desirable
level of funded status. The plans assets are invested so
that the total portfolio risk exposure and risk-adjusted returns
meet the plans long-term total return goal. Plan assets
are invested using active and passive investment strategies and
diversification that employ multiple investment funds. Funds
cover a diverse range of investment styles and approaches and
are combined in a way to achieve a target allocation across
capitalization and style biases (equities) and interest rate
expectations (fixed income) and to minimize the concentrations
of risk arising within or across categories of plan assets. The
Companys management monitors performance against benchmark
indices. The plans investment policy prohibits the use of
derivatives for speculative purposes. The assets of the plan are
periodically rebalanced to remain within the desired target
allocations. The expected rate of return on assets is determined
based on the historical results of the portfolio, the expected
investment mix of the plans assets, and estimates of
future long-term investment returns, and takes into
consideration of external actuarial and investment advisor
advice. The weighted average target asset allocations for
domestic pension plans and postretirement plans are 60% for
equity and 40% for fixed income for the year ended
December 31, 2010. Based on the level of our contributions
to the Applied Biosystems domestic pension plan, Life
Technologies Pension Plan and Dexter PRMB Plan during previous
and current fiscal years, we do not expect to have to fund these
pension plans in fiscal year 2011 in order to meet minimum
statutory funding requirements. The Companys funding
approach for its funded pension plans is based on the amount
needed to meet the minimum funding standards according to the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The Company may
also make additional contributions from time to time consistent
with the Companys cash flow and business conditions. Plan
benefits for nonqualified plans are paid as they become due.
92
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The fair value by asset category for the Companys funded
pension plans and postretirement plans at December 31, 2010
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active Markets
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level
2)(1)
|
|
|
(Level
3)(2)
|
|
|
Domestic Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
22,247
|
|
|
$
|
22,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic collective
trusts(3)
|
|
|
270,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
International collective
trusts(4)
|
|
|
133,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
404,509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
404,509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic collective
trusts(5)
|
|
|
244,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
671,635
|
|
|
$
|
22,247
|
|
|
$
|
649,388
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic collective
trusts(3)
|
|
$
|
2,544
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,544
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
International collective
trusts(4)
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
3,783
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,783
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic collective
trusts(5)
|
|
$
|
2,344
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,344
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
1,283
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed income
securities(6)
|
|
|
20,267
|
|
|
|
20,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
contracts(2)
|
|
|
65,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
87,321
|
|
|
$
|
21,550
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All investments measured with significant observable inputs
under the category level 2 are the collective funds, which
are quoted by net assets value, or NAV. The majority of these
shares are Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) based
commingled trusts, which are only offered to ERISA plans and are
privately placed. Although the shares are actively traded and
quoted by the market, due to the restriction on the trading and
the possible liquidation risk, the Company placed these funds
under the level 2. At December 31, 2010, NAV
approximated the fair value of the funds. |
(2) |
|
All investments measured with significant unobservable inputs
under the category level 3 are the insurance contracts held
by our foreign subsidiaries. The valuation of the insurance
contracts is determined by the cash surrender value, adjusted by
the income earned or expense incurred based on the specified
terms by the plan agreement, which approximate the fair value. |
(3) |
|
This category is comprised of 79% by large-cap domestic
commingled trusts and 21% by
small-to-mid-cap
domestic commingled trusts. |
(4) |
|
This category is primarily comprised of core international
commingled trusts. |
(5) |
|
This category is comprised of 70% by domestic core opportunistic
fixed income commingled trusts and 30% by domestic passive fixed
income commingled trusts. |
(6) |
|
This category is invested in publicly traded international funds. |
The Companys foreign pension plans assets are primarily
comprised of third party insurance investments. The investments
are invested by the third party with guaranteed minimum returns.
The Company values these contracts based on the net asset value
underlying the contract. In the event the returns are less than
the guaranteed return, the Company reviews the third party
solvency as part of the valuation of the investment. For those
assets measured with
93
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
significant Level 3 inputs, the following table summarizes
the activity for the year ended December 31, 2010 by asset
category for the Companys funded pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(Level
3)(2)
|
|
Description
|
|
Insurance Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Funded Foreign Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
64,191
|
|
|
$
|
64,191
|
|
Actual return on plan assets for assets still held at
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
Actual return on plan assets for assets sold during 2010
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Purchases, sales, and settlements
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
65,771
|
|
|
$
|
65,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for postretirement plans. A
one-percentage point change in weighted average assumed health
care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
1% increase
|
|
1% decrease
|
|
Effect on interest cost plus service cost
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
|
|
(1,654
|
)
|
The weighted average assumed health care cost trend rates on the
postretirement plans at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
Dental
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
8.70
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2028
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our estimated future employer contributions, gross expected
benefit payments, and gross amount of annual Medicare
Part D federal subsidy expected to be received at
December 31, 2010, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Employer Contributions 2011
|
|
$
|
2,353
|
|
|
$
|
3,162
|
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Benefit Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
48,450
|
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
2012
|
|
|
48,726
|
|
|
|
3,164
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
2013
|
|
|
48,858
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
2014
|
|
|
48,861
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
3,679
|
|
2015
|
|
|
49,038
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
251,248
|
|
|
|
20,209
|
|
|
|
15,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Federal Subsidy Receipts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
94
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
On April 30, 2009, the Companys stockholders approved
the Life Technologies Corporation 2009 Equity Incentive Plan
(the 2009 Plan), which replaced the Companys 1999 and 2004
stock option plans discussed below. Upon approval of the 2009
Plan, the 1999 and 2004 Plans were frozen and a total of
11 million shares of the Companys common stock were
reserved for granting of new awards under the 2009 Plan.
The Companys 2009 Plan permits the granting of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards,
restricted stock units, performance awards and deferred stock
awards of up to 11 million shares of stock. Shares of the
Companys common stock granted under the 2009 Plan in the
form of stock options or stock appreciation rights are counted
against the 2009 Plan share reserve on a
one-for-one
basis. Shares of the Companys common stock granted under
the 2009 Plan as an award other than as an option or as a stock
appreciation right are counted against the 2009 Plan share
reserve at 1.6 shares for each share of common stock basis.
Stock option awards are granted to eligible employees and
directors at an exercise price equal to no less than the fair
market value of such stock on the date of grant, generally vest
over a period of time of four years, are exercisable in whole or
in installments and expire ten years from the date of grant.
Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units are granted
to eligible employees and directors and represent rights to
receive shares of common stock at a future date. In addition,
the Company has a qualified employee stock purchase plan
(purchase rights) whereby eligible employees may
elect to withhold up to 15% of their compensation to purchase
shares of the Companys stock on a quarterly basis at a
discounted price equal to 85% of the lower of the
employees offering price or the closing price of the stock
on the date of purchase.
Prior to the adoption of the 2009 Plan on April 30, 2009,
the Company had ten stock option plans: the 1995, 1997, 2000,
2001, 2002, 2004, and 2009 Life Technologies Corporation stock
option plans, the 1996 and 1998 NOVEX Stock Option/Stock
Issuance Plans, and the Life Technologies 1995 and 1997
Long-Term Incentive Plans. During 2004, the Companys
stockholders approved the 2004 Invitrogen Corporation Equity
Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan), which was subsequently frozen by
the 2009 Plan on April 30, 2009. The 2004 Plan replaced the
Companys 1997, 2000, 2001 and 2002 stock option plans
(collectively, the Prior Plans). Upon approval of the 2004 Plan,
all Prior Plans were frozen. The total shares reserved for
issuance under the 2004 Plan included all options and other
awards that the Company granted that were still outstanding
under the Prior Plans prior to April 30, 2009. Pursuant to
an employment agreement entered in May 2003, the Company granted
an option to purchase 1.4 million shares of the
Companys common stock to its Chief Executive Officer,
which was granted outside any of the Companys option plans
discussed above.
Upon the merger with AB, the Company assumed five stock plans:
the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan, the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and
Restated 1993 Director Stock Purchase and Deferred
Compensation Plan, the Perkin-Elmer Corporation 1997 Stock
Incentive Plan, the Life Technologies Corporation Amended and
Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan), and the Life
Technologies Incorporated Amended and Restated 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (collectively, the Assumed Plans). Upon
assumption of the 1999 Plan (subsequently frozen by the 2009
plan), all prior plans were frozen. The total shares reserved
for issuance under the 1999 Plan included all options and other
awards that the Company granted that were still outstanding
under the Prior Plans prior to April 30, 2009.
Prior to February 1, 2010, the Company had a qualified (the
2004 ESPP Plan) employee stock purchase plan (purchase rights)
whereby eligible employees of Life Technologies (previously
known as Invitrogen Corporation) could elect to withhold up to
15% of their compensation to purchase shares of the
Companys stock on a quarterly basis at a discounted price
equal to 85% of the lower of the employees offering price
or the closing price of the stock on the date of purchase. The
Company also had a qualified (the 1999 ESPP Plan) employee stock
purchase plan whereby eligible legacy Applied Biosystems Inc.
(AB) employees could elect to withhold up to 10% of their
compensation to purchase shares of the Companys stock on a
quarterly basis at a discounted price equal to 85% of the lower
of the employees offering price or the closing price of
the stock on the date of purchase.
95
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Effective February 1, 2010 the Company created a new
qualified employee stock purchase plan (the 2010 ESPP Plan)
which covers all eligible employees of the Company. Eligible
employees may elect to withhold up to 15% of their compensation
to purchase shares of the Companys stock on a quarterly
basis at a discounted price equal to 85% of the lower of the
employees offering price or the closing price of the stock
on the date of purchase. The 2010 ESPP Plan replaces the 1999
ESPP Plan acquired as a result of the AB acquisition. Employees
grandfathered under the 2004 ESPP Plan may continue to purchase
under the 2004 Plan for a maximum of two years from the offering
date of their subscription.
The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
(Black-Scholes model) to value share-based employee stock option
and purchase right awards. The determination of fair value of
stock-based payment awards using an option-pricing model
requires the use of certain estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amount of share-based compensation cost
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Among these
include the expected term of options, estimated forfeitures,
expected volatility of the Companys stock price, expected
dividends and the risk-free interest rate.
The expected term of share-based awards represents the
weighted-average period the awards are expected to remain
outstanding and is an input in the Black-Scholes model. In
determining the expected term of options, the Company considered
various factors including the vesting period of options granted,
employees historical exercise and post-vesting employment
termination behavior, expected volatility of the Companys
stock and aggregation by homogeneous employee groups. The
Company used a combination of the historical volatility of its
stock price and the implied volatility of market-traded options
of the Companys stock with terms of up to approximately
two years to estimate the expected volatility assumption input
to the Black-Scholes model in accordance with ASC Topic 718,
CompensationEquity Compensation and the SECs
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). The
Companys decision to use a combination of historical and
implied volatility was based upon the availability of actively
traded options of its stock and its assessment that such a
combination was more representative of future expected stock
price trends. The expected dividend yield assumption is based on
the Companys expectation of future dividend payouts. The
Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its
common stock and currently does not anticipate paying such cash
dividends. The Company currently anticipates that it will retain
all of its future earnings for use in the development and
expansion of its business, for debt repayment and for general
corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the
future will be at the discretion of the Companys Board of
Directors and will depend upon its results of operations,
financial condition, tax laws and other factors as the Board of
Directors, in its discretion, deems relevant. The risk-free
interest rate is based upon United States Treasury securities
with remaining terms similar to the expected term of the
share-based awards.
Stock
Options and Purchase Rights
The underlying assumptions used to value employee stock options
and purchase rights granted during the year ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Purchase Rights
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Expected term of share-based awards
|
|
|
4.4 yrs
|
|
|
|
1.0 yrs
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
30.6
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average fair value of share-based awards granted
|
|
$
|
14.74
|
|
|
$
|
9.38
|
|
96
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Purchase Rights
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Expected term of share-based awards
|
|
|
4.4 yrs
|
|
|
|
0.4 yrs
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
42.7
|
%
|
|
|
58.1
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average fair value of share-based awards granted
|
|
$
|
13.27
|
|
|
$
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Purchase Rights
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Expected term of share-based awards
|
|
|
4.6 yrs
|
|
|
|
1.4 yrs
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
32.3
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average fair value of share-based awards granted
|
|
$
|
11.41
|
|
|
$
|
9.64
|
|
ASC Topic 718, CompensationEquity Compensation
requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash
flow. Excess tax benefits of $21.1 million and
$14.1 million were reported as net financing cash flows for
the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company is required to estimate forfeitures at the time of
grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods on a
cumulative basis in the period the estimated forfeiture rate
changes. The Company considered its historical experience of
pre-vesting option forfeitures as the basis to arrive at its
estimated pre-vesting option forfeiture rate of 4.1 percent
per year at the year ended December 31, 2010. All option
awards, including those with graded vesting, were valued as a
single award with a single average expected term and are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. At
December 31, 2010, there was $48.0 million remaining
in unrecognized compensation cost related to employee stock
options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.7 years. No compensation cost was
capitalized in inventory during the year ended December 31,
2010 as the amounts involved are not material.
Total share-based compensation expense for employee stock
options and purchase rights for the years ended December 31
is composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
4,950
|
|
|
$
|
3,452
|
|
|
$
|
4,037
|
|
Sales, general and administrative
|
|
|
29,326
|
|
|
|
28,291
|
|
|
|
27,120
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
5,760
|
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
|
3,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense before taxes
|
|
|
40,036
|
|
|
|
36,808
|
|
|
|
34,886
|
|
Related income tax benefits
|
|
|
12,159
|
|
|
|
12,320
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
27,877
|
|
|
$
|
24,488
|
|
|
$
|
24,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net share-based compensation expense per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was
$62.6 million, $64.7 million, and $13.5 million
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Total cash received from the exercise of employee
stock options and purchase rights was $94.1 million and
$37.2 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
97
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The total fair value of shares vested during the current year
was $23.9 million. A summary of employee stock option
activity for the year ended December 31, 2010 is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
16,408
|
|
|
$
|
39.86
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
299,157
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
51.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,049
|
)
|
|
|
31.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
97.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
13,335
|
|
|
$
|
35.04
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
272,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
8,372
|
|
|
$
|
31.65
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
199,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units
Restricted stock units represent a right to receive shares of
common stock at a future date determined in accordance with the
participants award agreement. There is no exercise price
and no monetary payment is required for receipt of restricted
stock units or the shares issued in settlement of the award.
Instead, consideration is furnished in the form of the
participants services to the Company. Restricted stock
units generally vest over three years. Compensation cost for
these awards is based on the estimated fair value on the date of
grant and recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period. There were no
pre-vesting forfeitures estimated for the year ended
December 31, 2010. For the years ended December 31,
2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $39.0 million and
$23.3 million, respectively, in share-based compensation
cost related to these restricted stock unit awards. At
December 31, 2010, there was $76.0 million remaining
in unrecognized compensation cost related to these awards, which
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.0 years. The estimated amortization expense of the
deferred compensation on the restricted stock unit awards as of
December 31, 2010 is $40.4 million,
$29.7 million, and $5.0 million for 2011, 2012 and
2013, respectively.
The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock
units granted during the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$52.18. A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the year
ended December 31, 2010 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Term in Years
|
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
167,507
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
182,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
$
|
14,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Stock Awards
The 2004 Plan also provides that certain participants who are
executives or members of a select group of highly compensated
employees may elect to receive, in lieu of payment in cash or
stock of all or any portion of such participants cash
and/or stock
compensation, an award of deferred stock units. A participant
electing to receive deferred stock units will be granted
automatically, on the effective date of such deferral election,
a deferred stock unit award for a number of stock units equal to
the amount of the deferred compensation divided by an amount
equal
98
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
to the fair market value of a share of the Companys common
stock on the date of grant. During the years ending
December 31, 2010 and 2009, no participants participated in
the program and therefore no shares were deferred under this
plan. The 2004 Plan is authorized to grant up to
200,000 shares of common stock as deferred stock units.
|
|
11.
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
Cash and
Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities
The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash
equivalents, foreign cash accounts, accounts receivable, prepaid
expenses, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued
expenses, and other current liabilities approximate the related
fair values due to the short-term maturities of these
instruments. The Company invests its excess cash into financial
instruments that are readily convertible into cash, such as
marketable securities, money market funds, corporate notes,
government securities, highly liquid debt instruments, time
deposits, and certificates of deposit with original maturities
of three months or less at the date of purchase. The Company
considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three
months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
The Company has established guidelines to maintain safety and
liquidity for our financial instruments, and the cost of
securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
Investments consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank time deposits
|
|
$
|
20,425
|
|
|
$
|
10,766
|
|
Foreign Bonds
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
|
23,079
|
|
|
|
10,766
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,827
|
|
Put option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,973
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
345,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
380,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
45,527
|
|
|
$
|
390,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
has redefined fair value and required the Company to
establish a framework for measuring fair value and expand
disclosures about fair value measurements. The framework
requires the valuation of assets and liabilities subject to fair
value measurements using a three tiered approach and fair value
measurement be classified and disclosed in one of the following
three categories:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
that are accessible at the measurement date for identical,
unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are
not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or
indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability;
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require
inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement
and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market
activity).
99
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table represents the financial instruments
measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the financial
statements of the Company subject to ASC Topic 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures and the valuation
approach applied to each class of financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Bank time deposits
|
|
$
|
20,425
|
|
|
$
|
20,425
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign bonds
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
284,251
|
|
|
|
284,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets
|
|
|
28,639
|
|
|
|
28,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets-derivative forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
15,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
351,158
|
|
|
$
|
335,969
|
|
|
$
|
15,189
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities-derivative forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
46,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Considerations
|
|
|
263,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
309,601
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,290
|
|
|
$
|
263,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the financial
instruments measured and classified within Level 1 was
based on quoted prices and marked to market.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
acquired foreign bonds that were classified as
available-for-sale
securities with a fair value of $2.7 million as of
December 31, 2010. During the year ended December 31,
2010, there was a de minimus amount of loss recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income, and there were no gains
or losses reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive
income to earnings as a result of the sales of
available-for-sale
securities.
Exchange traded derivatives are valued using quoted market
prices and classified within Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy. Level 2 derivatives include foreign currency
forward contracts for which fair value is determined by using
observable market spot rates and forward points adjusted by
risk-adjusted discount rates. The risk-adjusted discount rate is
derived by United States dollar zero coupon yield bonds for the
corresponding duration of the maturity of derivatives, then
adjusted with a counter party default risk for the value of our
derivative assets or our credit risk for the value of our
derivative liabilities. Credit risk is derived by observable
credit default swaps (CDS) spreads. Because CDS spreads
information is not available for our Company, our credit risk is
determined by analyzing CDS spreads of similar size public
entities in the same industry with similar credit ratings. The
value of our derivatives discounted by risk-adjusted discount
rates represents the present value of amounts estimated to be
received for the assets or paid to transfer the liabilities at
the measurement date from a marketplace participant in
settlement of these instruments.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
settled the entire remaining principal balance of
$34.8 million of auction rate securities the Company held
with UBS, plus interest earned thereon, with the
$34.8 million of loan principal balance outstanding with
UBS plus interest accrued thereon. In November 2008 UBS loaned
cash to the Company equal to the par value of the auction rate
securities, without recourse, and with the auction rate
securities serving as collateral with interest charges accruing
at the same rate as the yields earned on the underlying
securities, in an attempt to restore liquidity after the market
failed on executing auctions. Additionally, UBS committed to
repurchase auction rate securities from their private clients at
par. The Company considered these rights to sell the securities
at par as put options. At the same time the Company initiated
the loan, the Company elected the fair value option for these
put options in accordance with the ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures as a result of reclassification
of the auction rate securities from available for sales
securities to trading securities to reflect the change in
intended holding period. With the fair value option elected on
the put options, any subsequent change in fair value of the put
option offset the changes in the underlying fair value of the
100
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
related auction rate securities that resulted in no material net
impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The put
options and auction rate securities were measured at fair value
utilizing Level 3 inputs. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, the Company did not recognize any net
gain or loss related to the auction rate securities, the related
put option, or as a result of the settlement. Due to our fair
value election on the put option and our trading securities
designation on the auction rate securities, all realized and
unrealized gains or losses related to these financial
instruments, whose fair values were determined based on
Level 3 inputs, were included in other income (expense).
Contingent consideration arrangements obligate the Company to
pay former owners of an acquired entity if specified future
events occur or conditions are met such as the achievement of
certain technological milestones, patent milestones or the
achievement of targeted revenue milestones. The Company measures
such liabilities using level 3 unobservable inputs,
applying the income approach, such as the discounted cash flow
technique, or the probability-weighted scenario method. The
Company used various key assumptions, such as the probability of
achievement on the agreed milestones arrangement and the
discount rate, to represent the non-performing risk factors and
time value when applying the income approach. The Company
continuously monitors the fair value of the contingent
considerations, with subsequent revisions reflected in the
Statement of Operations in the line items commensurate with the
underlying nature of milestone arrangements. For a further
discussion on contingent consideration accounting, refer to
Note 2 Business Combinations and Note 6
Commitments and Contingencies.
For those financial instrument assets with significant
Level 3 inputs, the following table summarizes the activity
for the year ended December 31, 2010 by investment type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
Auction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Put Option
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
30,827
|
|
|
$
|
3,973
|
|
|
$
|
34,800
|
|
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements
|
|
|
(31,215
|
)
|
|
|
(3,585
|
)
|
|
|
(34,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of unrealized losses for the period included in
other comprehensive loss attributable to the change in fair
market value of related assets still held at the reporting date
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
For financial instrument liabilities with significant
Level 3 inputs, the following table summarizes the activity
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant
|
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
Contingent
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
8,800
|
|
|
$
|
8,800
|
|
Transfers into Level 3 from business combinations
|
|
|
260,811
|
|
|
|
260,811
|
|
Total realized/unrealized gains included in earnings
|
|
|
(6,300
|
)
|
|
|
(6,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
263,311
|
|
|
$
|
263,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of unrealized losses for the period included in
other comprehensive loss attributable to the change in fair
market value of related liabilities still held at the reporting
date
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
101
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring
Basis
Non-financial assets and liabilities are recognized at fair
value subsequent to initial recognition when they are deemed to
be
other-than-temporarily
impaired. There were no material non-financial assets and
liabilities deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired and measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for
the year ended December 31, 2010.
The Company evaluates its investments in equity and debt
securities that are accounted for using the equity method or
cost method to determine whether an
other-than-temporary
impairment or a credit loss exists at period end. At
December 31, 2010, the Company held an aggregate
$22.4 million of long-term investments in non-publicly
traded companies that are accounted for under the cost method.
The Company assesses these investments for impairment each
quarter, but does not calculate a fair value. Due to the nature
of these investments, mainly non-public and early stage
companies, the Company believes calculating a fair value not to
be practicable. In the event the Company identified an indicator
of impairment, the assessment of fair value would be based on
all available factors, and may include valuation methodologies
using level 3 unobservable inputs, which include discounted
cash flows, estimates of sales proceeds and appraisals, as
appropriate. At December 31, 2010, the Company determined
that there was no event or change in circumstances that occurred
which had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the
cost method investments during the year ended December 31,
2010.
Foreign
Currency and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company translates the financial statements of its foreign
subsidiaries using
end-of-period
exchange rates for assets and liabilities and average exchange
rates during each reporting period for results of operations.
Net gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign
financial statements and the effect of exchange rate changes on
intercompany receivables and payables of a long-term investment
nature are recorded as a separate component of
stockholders equity. These adjustments will affect net
income only upon sale or liquidation of the underlying
investment in a foreign subsidiary. The cumulative translation
adjustments included in accumulated other comprehensive income
reported as a separate component of stockholders equity
were a net cumulative gain of $158.1 million and
$86.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Some of the Companys reporting entities conduct a portion
of their business in currencies other than the entitys
functional currency. These transactions give rise to receivables
and payables that are denominated in currencies other than the
entitys functional currency. The value of these
receivables and payables is subject to changes in currency
exchange rates from the point at which the transactions are
originated until the settlement in cash. Both realized and
unrealized gains and losses in the value of these receivables
and payables are included in the determination of net income.
Net currency exchange gains (losses) recognized on business
transactions, net of hedging transactions, were
$0.4 million, $(9.0) million and $8.3 million for
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and are included in other income (expense) in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
To manage the foreign currency exposure risk, the Company uses
derivatives for activities in entities that have receivables and
payables denominated in a currency other than the entitys
functional currency. Realized and unrealized gains or losses on
the value of financial contracts entered into to hedge the
exchange rate exposure of these receivables and payables are
also included in the determination of net income as they have
not been designated for hedge accounting under ASC Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging. These contracts, which settle
January 2011 through May 2011, effectively fix the exchange rate
at which these specific receivables and payables will be settled
in, so that gains or losses on the forward contracts offset the
gains or losses from changes in the value of the underlying
receivables and payables. At December 31, 2010, the Company
had a notional principal amount of $1,012.7 million in
foreign currency forward contracts outstanding to hedge currency
risk relative to our foreign receivables and payables.
The Companys international operating units conduct
business in, and have functional currencies that differ from the
parent entity, and therefore, the ultimate conversion of these
sales to cash in United States dollars is subject
102
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
to fluctuations in foreign currency. The Companys intent
is to limit this exposure on the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows from changes in currency exchange rates through hedging.
Upon entering derivative transactions, when the United States
dollar strengthens significantly against foreign currencies, the
decline in the United States dollar value of future foreign
currency revenue is offset by gains in the value of the forward
contracts designated as hedges. Conversely, when the United
States dollar weakens, the opposite occurs. The Companys
currency exposures vary, but are primarily concentrated in the
euro, British pound sterling, Japanese yen and Canadian dollar.
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate
foreign currency risk on forecasted foreign currency
intercompany sales that are expected to be settled through July
2011. The change in fair value prior to their maturity is
accounted for as cash flow hedges, and recorded in other
comprehensive income, net of tax, in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets according to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and
Hedging. To the extent any portion of the forward contracts
is determined to not be an effective hedge, the increase or
decrease in value prior to the maturity is recorded in other
income/(expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had a notional principal
amount of $486.8 million in foreign currency forward
contracts outstanding to hedge foreign currency revenue risk
under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. During the
year ended December 31, 2010, the Company did not have any
material losses or gains related to the ineffective portion of
its hedging instruments in other expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. No hedging relationships were
terminated as a result of ineffective hedging or forecasted
transactions no longer probable of occurring for foreign
currency forward contacts. The Company continuously monitors the
probability of forecasted transactions as part of the hedge
effectiveness testing. The Company reclasses deferred gains or
losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income into
revenue when the consolidated earnings are impacted, which for
intercompany sales are when the inventory is sold to a third
party. For intercompany sales hedging, the Company uses an
inventory turnover ratio for each international operating unit
to align the timing of a hedged item and a hedging instrument to
impact the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the same
reporting period. At December 31, 2010, the Company expects
to recognize $44.7 million of net losses on derivative
instruments currently classified under accumulated other
comprehensive income to revenue, offsetting the change in
revenue due to foreign currency translation, during the next
twelve months.
In January of 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap
agreements that effectively converted variable rate interest
payments to fixed rate interest payments for a notional amount
of $1,000.0 million (a portion of term loan A) of
which $300.0 million of swap payment arrangements would
have expired in January of 2012 and $700.0 million of swap
payment arrangements would have expired in January of 2013.
During February 2010, term loan A and term loan B were fully
repaid in conjunction with the new senior notes issuance. As a
result, the Company de-designated the hedging relationship due
to the forecasted transactions no longer being probable of
occurring and recognized a $12.9 million loss during the
year ended December 31, 2010 as a discontinuance of the
cash flow hedges in accordance with ASC Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging. During the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, there was no
recognized gain or loss related to the ineffective portion of
its designated hedging instruments in other expense in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
entered into forward interest rate swap agreements for a
notional amount totaling $1,500.0 million for a certain
part of Senior Notes issuances. These agreements were to hedge
the variability in future probable interest payments
attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate from the
date the Company entered into the forward interest rate swap
agreements to the date the Company issued the Senior Notes.
These agreements effectively hedged a series of semi-annual
future interest payments to the fixed interest rates for
forecasted debt issuances. The Company recorded total proceeds
of $4.3 million from the forward interest rate swaps in
accumulated other comprehensive income, which will be
reclassified to interest expense in the same period during which
the hedged transactions affect interest expense.
103
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative
instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments designated and qualified as cash flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,333
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
41,558
|
|
|
$
|
11,582
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,333
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,558
|
|
|
$
|
16,702
|
|
Derivatives instruments not designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
15,189
|
|
|
$
|
15,470
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,732
|
|
|
$
|
9,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,189
|
|
|
$
|
15,470
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,732
|
|
|
$
|
9,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,189
|
|
|
$
|
19,803
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,290
|
|
|
$
|
26,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative
instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
from
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
AOCI into
|
|
AOCI into
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
AOCI into
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
|
OCI
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
OCI
|
|
|
Income
|
|
into Income
|
|
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments designated and qualified as cash flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
16,149
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
20,688
|
|
|
$
|
3,515
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
(13,308
|
)
|
Forward starting interest rate swap contracts
|
|
|
(4,312
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
|
7,772
|
**
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,120
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
$
|
19,609
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,871
|
|
|
$
|
8,635
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
recognized in
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
recognized in
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Income
|
|
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments designated and qualified as cash flow
hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other (income)expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
Forward starting interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Other (income)expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts
|
|
Other (income)expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
(Gain)/Loss
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
(in thousands)(unaudited)
|
|
Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments not designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward exchange contracts
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
$
|
(69,340
|
)
|
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
$
|
(19,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
(69,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
De minimus amount recognized in the hedge relationship. |
|
** |
|
$7.8 million was a part of the $12.9 million loss on
discontinuance of cash flow hedge related to term loan A
interest rate swaps. The difference of $5.1 million was
recognized in other comprehensive income in 2009. The entire
$12.9 million was reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income into other income/(expense) during the
first quarter of 2010. |
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk are cash and cash equivalents,
investments, and accounts receivable. We attempt to minimize the
risks related to cash and cash equivalents and investments by
using highly-rated financial institutions that invest in a broad
and diverse range of financial instruments. We have established
guidelines relative to credit ratings and maturities intended to
maintain safety and liquidity. Concentration of credit risk with
respect to accounts receivable is limited due to our large and
diverse customer base, which is dispersed over different
geographic areas. Allowances are maintained for potential credit
losses and such losses have historically been within our
expectations. Our investment portfolio is maintained in
accordance with our investment policy that defines allowable
investments, specifies credit quality standards and limits the
credit exposure of any single issuer.
Our derivatives instruments have an element of risk in that the
counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the
agreements. We attempt to minimize this risk by limiting the
counterparties to a diverse group of highly-rated domestic and
international financial institutions. In the event of
non-performance by these counterparties, the asset position
carrying values of our financial instruments represent the
maximum amount of loss we could incur as of December 31,
2010. However, we do not expect to record any losses as a result
of counterparty default in the foreseeable future. We do not
require and are not required to pledge collateral for these
financial instruments. The Company does not use derivative
financial instruments for speculation or trading purposes or for
activities other than risk management and we are not a party to
leveraged derivatives. In addition, we do not carry any master
netting arrangements to mitigate the credit risk. The Company
continually evaluates the costs and benefits of its hedging
program.
Debt
Obligations
The Company has certain financial instruments in which the
carrying value does not equal the fair value. The estimated fair
value of the senior notes, the convertible senior notes, the
secured loan, and the term loans was determined by using
observable market information.
105
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The fair value and carrying amounts of the Companys debt
obligations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amounts
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
3.375% Senior Notes (principal due 2013)
|
|
$
|
254,663
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,914
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
4.400% Senior Notes (principal due 2015)
|
|
|
520,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.500% Senior Notes (principal due 2016)
|
|
|
396,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.000% Senior Notes (principal due 2020)
|
|
|
805,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.000% Senior Notes (principal due 2021)
|
|
|
396,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
31/4% Convertible
Senior Notes (principal due 2025)
|
|
|
413,000
|
|
|
|
400,750
|
|
|
|
345,360
|
|
|
|
336,481
|
|
11/2% Convertible
Senior Notes (principal due 2024)
|
|
|
545,909
|
|
|
|
472,500
|
|
|
|
428,356
|
|
|
|
409,858
|
|
2% Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,595
|
|
Term Loan A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330,000
|
|
Term Loan B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,500
|
|
Secured Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,800
|
|
For details on the carrying amounts of the long-term debt
obligations, refer to Note 5 Long-Term Debt.
In November 2008, the Company completed the merger with AB to
form a company that combines both businesses into a global
leader in biotechnology reagents and instrument systems
dedicated to improving the human condition. In connection with
the merger and the desire to achieve synergies associated with
economies of scale, the Company initiated a restructuring plan
under two phases; the first phase was launched immediately after
the merger date to complete in the short-term, and the second
phase was launched to complete in approximately two years, to
provide one-time termination costs including severance costs and
retention bonuses related to elimination of duplicative
positions and change in control agreements to primarily sales,
finance, IT, research and development, and customer services
employees, one-time relocation costs to those employees whose
employment positions have been moved to another location, and
one-time charges associated with closure of certain leased
facilities which are no longer being used in the Companys
operations. The Company finalized its restructuring plan during
the fiscal year 2009 and expects to complete its entire plan in
early 2011.
For the restructuring activities related to the acquired
companys employees and facilities (the first phase), the
activities have been accounted for in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination. As a result, the Company increased the
purchase price of AB by $98.2 million, which consisted of
$90.3 million, $0.7 million, and $7.2 million of
one-time termination costs, one-time relocation costs, and
one-time site closure costs, respectively. If the actual payment
is less than the expected amount, any excess reserves will be
reversed with a corresponding decrease in goodwill. If the
actual payment exceeds the expected amount, any additional costs
will be recorded in business consolidation costs in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
106
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity
accounted for under
EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination, for the year ended December 31,
2010, as well as the remaining restructuring accrual in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Site Closure
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
10,221
|
|
|
$
|
4,752
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
15,450
|
|
Amounts paid
|
|
|
(9,426
|
)
|
|
|
(3,819
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(13,436
|
)
|
Accrual adjustment
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(1,225
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restructuring activities related to the acquirers
employees and facilities, as well as the activities related to
the acquirees employees and facilities initiated under the
second phase were accounted for under ASC Topic 420, Exit or
Disposal Cost. The Company recognized total restructuring
expenses of $49.5 million, which consisted of
$41.4 million for one-time termination costs,
$6.5 million for one-time relocation costs, and
$1.6 million for site closures, since inception of the
plan. The Company anticipates that the remaining restructuring
obligation of $8.7 million will be settled in early 2011.
During the year ended December 31, 2010,
$24.8 million, $3.5 million, and $0.4 million of
one-time termination costs, one-time relocation costs, and
one-time site closure costs, respectively, were included in
business consolidation costs in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity
accounted for under ASC Topic 420, Exit or Disposal Cost
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as the
remaining restructuring accrual in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Site Closure
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
9,274
|
|
|
$
|
445
|
|
|
$
|
1,379
|
|
|
$
|
11,098
|
|
Charged to expenses
|
|
|
24,777
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
28,657
|
|
Amounts paid
|
|
|
(23,812
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
(26,577
|
)
|
Accrual adjustment
|
|
|
(2,046
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(1,826
|
)
|
|
|
(3,892
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring reserves as of December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
7,649
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
8,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative amount incurred to date
|
|
$
|
41,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
|
$
|
6,511
|
|
|
$
|
49,472
|
|
|
|
13.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
85,262
|
|
|
$
|
121,192
|
|
|
$
|
37,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
189,304
|
|
|
$
|
145,214
|
|
|
$
|
44,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
LIFE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
14.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
(in thousands, except per share data) (unaudited)
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
884,943
|
|
|
$
|
903,732
|
|
|
$
|
867,082
|
|
|
$
|
932,337
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
533,103
|
|
|
|
540,681
|
|
|
|
514,361
|
|
|
|
517,996
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
$
|
91,506
|
|
|
$
|
110,568
|
|
|
$
|
105,540
|
|
|
$
|
70,681
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to Life Technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
775,737
|
|
|
$
|
832,763
|
|
|
$
|
800,729
|
|
|
$
|
871,115
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
384,686
|
|
|
|
481,628
|
|
|
|
462,785
|
|
|
|
495,625
|
|
Net income attributable to Life Technologies
|
|
$
|
15,604
|
|
|
$
|
38,943
|
|
|
$
|
41,136
|
|
|
$
|
48,912
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to Life Technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
The Company has completed an evaluation of all subsequent events
through the issuance date of these Consolidated Financial
Statements and the following represent subsequent events for
disclosure.
In January 2011, the Company repurchased 1.5 million shares
of its common stock under the July 2010 share repurchase
program at a total cost of approximately $83.4 million. The
Company thereby has completed the July 2010 program by
repurchasing aggregate of 9.9 million shares at a total
cost of $520.0 million, the maximum amount authorized. In
February 2011, the Company repurchased 1.9 million shares
of its common stock under the December 2010 share
repurchase program at a total cost of approximately
$100.0 million. The cost of all repurchased shares is
included in treasury stock and reported as a reduction in total
equity when a repurchase occurs.
108
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We
are responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other
procedures designed to ensure that the information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls
and procedures designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under
the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Based on our managements evaluation (with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer) of our disclosure controls and procedures as required
by
Rule 13a-15
under the Securities Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to achieve their stated
purpose as of December 31, 2010, the end of the period
covered by this report.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. We are responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act. Our internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision
of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and
effected by our Board of Directors, management, and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of
our financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made
only in accordance with the authorizations of our management and
directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
or disposition of our assets that could have a material adverse
effect on our financial statements.
Our management (with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer) assessed the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, our
management used the criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the
COSO criteria). Based on managements
assessment and the COSO criteria, our management concluded that
our internal control over financial reporting was effective as
of December 31, 2010.
Our independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, has issued a report on our internal
control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young
LLPs report appears below under this Item 9A and
expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of
Controls. Our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our
disclosure controls or our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
control systems objectives will be met. The design of a
control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
109
considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of
controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due
to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in
part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls
effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
110
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To The Board of Directors and the
Stockholders of Life Technologies Corporation
We have audited Life Technologies Corporations (the
Companys) internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Life Technologies
Corporations management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Life Technologies Corporation maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2010 of Life Technologies
Corporation and our report dated February 25, 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
San Diego, California
February 25, 2011
111
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
Amendment to Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement. On
February 23, 2011 at a meeting of the Compensation and
Organizational Development Committee of the Board of Directors
(C&OD Committee), the C&OD Committee approved an
amendment to the form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement used
under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan. Under the amended
Agreement, future Restricted Stock Unit grants to employees will
vest 25% on each anniversary of the grant date over a four-year
period, rather than cliff vesting on the third anniversary of
the grant date as previously provided.
The foregoing summary of the Amendment to the Form of Restricted
Stock Units Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the complete text of such agreement, as attached as
Exhibit 10.78.
Amendment to CEOs Employment Agreement. On
February 24, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors
approved an amended and restated employment agreement
(Employment Agreement) with Gregory T. Lucier, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board, modifying the existing employment agreement entered into
in 2003 between the Company and Mr. Lucier. While the
Company fully intends to retain Mr. Lucier for as long as
his performance continues at superior levels, the changes to his
Employment Agreement were designed to retain Mr. Lucier for
at least the next three years.
Under the terms of the Employment Agreement,
Mr. Luciers annual base salary is increased from
$1,150,000 to $1,200,000 effective April 2011 and his annual
bonus opportunity pursuant to the Companys Incentive
Compensation Plan remains the same at not less than one hundred
fifty percent (150%) of his base salary. Mr. Lucier will
also be eligible to participate in the Companys
equity-based incentive plans and other Company incentive plans
at the discretion of the C&OD Committee. On April 1,
2011, the Company will grant Mr. Lucier not less than
$8,000,000 in economic value of time-based vesting restricted
stock units that vest ratably over four years. The Company also
intends to grant Mr. Lucier at least 150,000 time-based
vesting restricted stock units on or about each of April 1 of
2012 and 2013; provided, however, that the economic value of
each such award in 2012 and 2013 will not exceed $12,000,000 on
the date of grant. Such grants made in 2012 and 2013 will
require approval by the C&OD Committee and the Board of
Directors at the time of award.
If Mr. Lucier voluntarily terminates his employment with
the Company for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment
Agreement) or the Company terminates Mr. Luciers
employment for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in
the Employment Agreement), the Company shall provide
Mr. Lucier (i) 1.5X his annual salary and target ICP
opportunity then in effect, (ii) 18 months of health
care benefits, and (iii) all equity-based incentives
(excluding stock options held by Mr. Lucier that have an
exercise price above the closing price of the Companys
common stock on his termination date) held by Mr. Lucier
which have not yet vested prior to the effective date of
termination shall become vested, and any stock options or stock
appreciation rights shall remain exercisable until the earlier
to occur of the first anniversary of Mr. Luciers
effective termination date, and their final stated expiration
date. In addition, if, at any time on or after September 1,
2013, Mr. Lucier provides to the Company written notice of
his voluntary resignation not less than six months prior to the
effective date of such resignation, all of
Mr. Luciers outstanding equity-based incentive
compensation (excluding stock options held by Mr. Lucier
that have an exercise price above the closing price of the
Companys common stock on his termination date) shall
become fully vested on his termination date; provided, however,
that such accelerated vesting shall not apply to any
equity-based incentives granted on or after January 1,
2013. All such vested stock options and stock appreciation
rights held by Mr. Lucier at the time of termination of
employment shall remain exercisable until their final stated
expiration date.
The foregoing summary of the Employment Agreement is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the
Employment Agreement, as attached as Exhibit 10.10.
112
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Information required by this Item relating to our executive
officers appears under the caption Executive Officers of
the Registrant in Part I of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this Item relating to our directors and
the committees of our board of directors is incorporated by
reference to our definitive proxy statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within
120 days of December 31, 2010 (Proxy Statement), under
the heading Election of Directors. Information
about Section 16 reporting compliance is incorporated by
reference to the Proxy Statement under the heading
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance. Information regarding our code of ethics,
which we call our Protocol, is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement under the heading The Life Technologies
Protocol. The Life Technologies Protocol is also available
on our website at www.lifetechnologies.com.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information required by this Item relating to director and
officer compensation will appear under the headings
Executive Compensation, Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Compensation Committee Report
in our Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information required by this Item relating to the securities
authorized under our equity plans will appear under the heading
Equity Compensation Plan Information in our Proxy
Statement and the information required by this Item relating to
the beneficial ownership of our common stock will appear under
the heading Stock Ownership in our Proxy Statement,
which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this Item relating to our related
party transactions will appear under the heading Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions in our Proxy
Statement, and the information required by this Item relating to
the directors will appear under the heading Election of
Directors in our Proxy Statement, which sections are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
Information required by this Item relating to auditor fees is
incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement under the
heading Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
113
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) 1. Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of Life
Technologies Corporation are included in Item 8.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Financial Statement Schedules: Schedule IIValuation
and Qualifying Accounts Financial statements and schedules other
than those listed below in item (c) are omitted for reason
that they are not applicable, are not required, or the
information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements
or the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
3.
|
List of exhibits filed with this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
For a list of exhibits filed with this
Form 10-K,
refer to the exhibit index beginning on page 118.
|
|
|
(b) |
Exhibits: For a list of exhibits filed with this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K,
refer to the exhibit index beginning on page 118.
|
(c) Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts (see
next page).
114
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule IIValuation
and Qualifying Accounts
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Additions
|
|
(Excess Reserve
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
Charged
|
|
Reductions)
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
(Credited)
|
|
from Business
|
|
|
|
Effect on
|
|
End of
|
(in thousands)
|
|
of Period
|
|
to Expense
|
|
Combinations
|
|
Deductions(1)
|
|
Translation
|
|
Period
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
10,809
|
|
|
$
|
2,356
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
(2,713
|
)
|
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,389
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
14,649
|
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
8,211
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
9,035
|
|
|
|
(2,283
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
14,649
|
|
Allowance for Inventory Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
106,348
|
|
|
$
|
1,581
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
(16,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
|
$
|
92,361
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
95,515
|
|
|
|
15,306
|
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
(10,298
|
)
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
106,348
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
45,978
|
|
|
|
10,099
|
|
|
|
49,659
|
|
|
|
(8,249
|
)
|
|
|
(1,972
|
)
|
|
|
95,515
|
|
Restructuring Accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
26,548
|
|
|
$
|
24,765
|
|
|
$
|
(1,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(749
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,326
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
69,099
|
|
|
|
17,278
|
|
|
|
29,256
|
|
|
|
(89,480
|
)
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
26,548
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
11,151
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
68,962
|
|
|
|
(14,551
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,099
|
|
Insurance, Environmental and Divestiture Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
11,291
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(899
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,577
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
13,248
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,291
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
8,788
|
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
3,560
|
|
|
|
(993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,248
|
|
Product Warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
12,586
|
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,406
|
)
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
7,177
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
12,616
|
|
|
|
12,050
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(12,510
|
)
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
12,586
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
|
11,047
|
|
|
|
(2,026
|
)
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
12,616
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deductions for Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Allowance for
Inventory Accounts are for accounts receivable written off and
disposal of obsolete inventory. Deductions for all other
accounts are amounts paid in cash or reclassified to accounts
payable or other accrued expenses. |
Restructuring accrual costs are classified as follows at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
9,326
|
|
|
$
|
26,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total included above
|
|
$
|
9,326
|
|
|
$
|
26,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance, environmental and divestiture reserves are classified
as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
4,236
|
|
|
$
|
7,131
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
6,341
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total included above
|
|
$
|
10,577
|
|
|
$
|
11,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net additions charged to expense for business integration costs
reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations are as
follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Business consolidation costs
|
|
$
|
93,450
|
|
|
$
|
112,943
|
|
|
$
|
38,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total business consolidation costs
|
|
$
|
93,450
|
|
|
$
|
112,943
|
|
|
$
|
38,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 25, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Gregory
T. Lucier
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Lucier
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and
Authorized Signatory)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE
|
|
TITLE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gregory
T. Lucier
Gregory
T. Lucier
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
F. Hoffmeister
David
F. Hoffmeister
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kelli
A. Richard
Kelli
A. Richard
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ George
F. Adam, Jr.
George
F. Adam, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Raymond
V. Dittamore
Raymond
V. Dittamore
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald
W. Grimm
Donald
W. Grimm
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Balakrishnan
S. Iyer
Balakrishnan
S. Iyer
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Arnold
J. Levine, Ph.D.
Arnold
J. Levine, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. Longfield
William
H. Longfield
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley
G. Lorimier
Bradley
G. Lorimier
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald
A. Matricaria
Ronald
A. Matricaria
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE
|
|
TITLE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Per
A. Peterson, Ph.D.
Per
A. Peterson, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.
Ann Reynolds, Ph.D.
W.
Ann Reynolds, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
C. UPrichard, Ph.D.
David
C. UPrichard, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
117
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
|
|
|
NUMBER
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Underwriting Agreement by and among Life Technologies and Banc
of America Securities LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P
Morgan Securities Inc., as representatives of the several
underwriters named therein, dated as of February 11, 2010.(1)
|
|
1
|
.2
|
|
Underwriting Agreement by and among Life Technologies and
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith and RBS
Securities, Inc., dated as of December 9, 2010.(2)
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Invitrogen
Corporation, Atom Acquisition, LLC and Applera Corporation dated
as of June 11, 2008.(3)
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
Invitrogen Corporation, Atom acquisition, LLC and Applied
Biosystems Inc., dated as of September 9, 2008.(4)
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
Invitrogen Corporation, Atom acquisition, LLC and Applied
Biosystems Inc., dated as of October 15, 2008.(5)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Life Technologies.(6)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Life Technologies.(7)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(8)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
2% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2023, Registration Rights
Agreement, by and among Life Technologies and UBS Securities LLC
and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, as Initial Purchasers, dated
August 1, 2003.(9)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, by and between Life Technologies and U.S. Bank
National Association, dated August 1, 2003.(9)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
11/2% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2024, Registration Rights Agreement, by and
among Life Technologies and UBS Securities LLC and Bear Stearns
& Co Inc., as Initial Purchasers, dated February 19,
2004.(10)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Indenture, by and between Life Technologies and U.S. Bank
National Association, dated February 19, 2004.(10)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Indenture, by and between Life Technologies and U.S. Bank
National Association, dated as of December 14, 2004.(11)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2025, Registration
Rights Agreement, by and among Life Technologies and UBS
Securities LLC and Banc of America Securities LLC., as Initial
Purchasers, dated June 20, 2005.(12)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2025, Indenture, by and
between Life Technologies and U.S. Bank National Association,
dated June 20, 2005.(12)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Indenture between Life Technologies and U.S. Bank National
Association., as trustee, dated as of February 19, 2010.(13)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture between Life Technologies and U.S.
Bank National Association., as trustee, dated as of February 19,
2010, including the forms of the Life Technologies
3.375% Senior Notes due 2013, 4.400% Senior Notes due
2015 and 6.000% Senior Notes due 2020.(13)
|
|
4
|
.11
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture between Life Technologies and
U.S. Bank National Association., as trustee, dated as of
December 14, 2010, including the forms of the Life
Technologies 3.50% Senior Notes due 2016 and 5.00% Senior Notes
due 2021.(2)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive
officers.(14)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and forms of Incentive Stock
Option Agreement and Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement
thereunder.(14)(*)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, and form of
subscription agreement thereunder.(14)(39)(*)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan
effective as of August 1, 1979, as amended through October 1,
1996.(15)(*)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Rights Agreement, by and between Invitrogen and Fleet National
Bank Rights Agent, dated February 27, 2001.(16)
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
|
|
|
NUMBER
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated on
July 19, 2001.(17)(*)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Amended and Restated 401(k) Plan, effective as of January 1,
2002.(18)(*)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as
of April 28, 2010.(6)(*)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
NSO Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation and Gregory
T. Lucier, dated as of May 30, 2003.(19)(*)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Life
Technologies and Gregory T. Lucier, effective as of
February 24, 2010.(*)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation
and Gregory T. Lucier, dated as of May 26, 2003.(20)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Restricted Stock Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation
and Nicholas Barthelemy, dated as of March 10, 2004.(10)(*)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Excess Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective July 1,
2004.(21)(40)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Executive Health Plan.(22)(*)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Financial Planning Benefit Plan.(22)(*)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Supplemental Long Term Disability Plan.(22)(*)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Invitrogen Corporation Deferred Stock Unit Plan.(22)(*)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation and
David F. Hoffmeister, effective October 13, 2004.(23)(*)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Notice of Grant and Incentive Stock Option Agreement by and
between Invitrogen Corporation and David F. Hoffmeister,
effective October 13, 2004.(23)(*)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Notice of Grant and Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement by and
between Invitrogen Corporation and David F. Hoffmeister,
effective October 13, 2004.(23)(*)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement by and
between Invitrogen Corporation and David F. Hoffmeister, dated
October 13, 2004.(23)(*)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation
and David F. Hoffmeister, dated as of October 13, 2004.(23)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Director Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the Applied
Biosystems Group Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan.(24)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Director Stock Award Agreement pursuant to the Applied
Biosystems Group Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan.(24)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Summary of Life Technologies Corporation Mid-Term Incentive
Compensation Plan.(25)(*)
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement.(26)
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement.(26)
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program.(26)
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for executive
officers pursuant to The Perkin-Elmer Corporation 1997 Stock
Incentive Plan.(27)
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for executive
officers pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and
Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.(27)
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for executive officers
pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and Restated
1999 Stock Incentive Plan.(27)
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Bonus Agreement for executive officers
pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and Restated
1999 Stock Incentive Plan.(27)
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Letter Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation and Peter
M. Leddy, effective July 5, 2005.(28)(*)
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Change-in-Control Agreement by and between Invitrogen
Corporation and Peter M. Leddy, dated as of July 5, 2005.(28)(*)
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
|
|
|
NUMBER
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between Invitrogen Corporation
and Peter M. Leddy, dated as of July 5, 2005.(28)
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for awards to
executive officers pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan relating to
performance during the 2006 through 2009 fiscal years.(29)
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Amendment, dated as of November 17, 2005, to the Deferred
Compensation Plan.(29)
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan.(30)(*)
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement under 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan.(30)(*)
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement under 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan.(30)(*)
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for awards to
executive officers pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan that vest based
on performance.(31)
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement for executive officers
pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and Restated
1999 Stock Incentive Plan relating to performance during the
2007 through 2009 fiscal years.(32)
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective as of December
31, 2005, as amended and restated as of August 28, 2006.(32)(*)
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Form of Change-in-Control Agreement for executive officers
employed between February 28, 2007 and September 1, 2008.(33)(*)
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Agreement for the
Chief Executive Officer.(33)(*)
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
Form of Change-in-Control Agreement for executive officers
employed on or before February 28, 2007.(33)(*)
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for executive
officers pursuant to the Applied Biosystems Group Amended and
Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended on October 19,
2006.(34)
|
|
10
|
.48
|
|
Notice of Grant of Performance Shares.(35)(*)
|
|
10
|
.49
|
|
Performance Share Award Agreement.(35)(*)
|
|
10
|
.50
|
|
Commitment Letter dated as of June 11, 2008, among Bank of
America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, UBS Loan Finance
LLC, UBS Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc. and
Invitrogen Corporation.(2)
|
|
10
|
.51
|
|
Form of Change-in-Control Agreement for executive officers
employed after September 1, 2008.(36)(*)
|
|
10
|
.52
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2008, among Life
Technologies Corporation, as the Borrower, the lenders from time
to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer.(37)
|
|
10
|
.53
|
|
Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2008, among Life
Technologies, as the Guarantor, the guarantors from time to time
party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral
Agent.(37)
|
|
10
|
.54
|
|
Security Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2008, among Life
Technologies, as the Guarantor, the guarantors from time to time
party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral
Agent.(37)
|
|
10
|
.55
|
|
Employment Agreement between Life Technologies Corporation and
Mark P. Stevenson, dated November 20, 2008.(37)
|
|
10
|
.56
|
|
Limited Waiver and Release of Rights to Terminate for Good
Reason Under the Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and David F. Hoffmeister, dated
November 21, 2008.(37)
|
|
10
|
.57
|
|
Limited Waiver and Release of Rights to Terminate for Good
Reason Under the Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and Peter M. Leddy, Ph.D, dated
November 21, 2008.(37)
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
|
|
|
NUMBER
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
|
|
|
10
|
.58
|
|
Limited Waiver and Release of Rights to Terminate for Good
Reason Under the Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and Claude D. Benchimol, dated November
21, 2008.(37)
|
|
10
|
.59
|
|
Limited Waiver and Release of Rights to Terminate for Good
Reason Under the Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and Nicolas M. Barthelemy, dated
November 21, 2008.(37)
|
|
10
|
.60
|
|
Amendment to Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and David F. Hoffmeister, dated
November 21, 2008.(37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.61
|
|
Amendment to Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and Peter M. Leddy, Ph.D, dated
November 21, 2008.(37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.62
|
|
Amendment to Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and Claude D. Benchimol, dated November
21, 2008.(37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.63
|
|
Amendment to Change-in-Control Agreement between Life
Technologies Corporation and Nicolas M. Barthelemy, dated
November 21, 2008.(37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.64
|
|
Executive Officer Severance Plan and Summary Plan Description.
(37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.65
|
|
Agreement Regarding Chief Financial Officer Compensation. (37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.66
|
|
Agreement Regarding Named Executive Officer Compensation. (37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.67
|
|
Agreement Regarding Chief Executive Officer Compensation.(37)(*)
|
|
10
|
.68
|
|
The Perkin-Elmer Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan.(38)(*)
|
|
10
|
.69
|
|
Applied Biosystems Group Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan, effective October 21, 2004.(38)(*)
|
|
10
|
.70
|
|
Amended and Restated 1993 Director Stock Purchase and
Deferred Compensation Plan.(38)(*)
|
|
10
|
.71
|
|
PE Corporation/PE Biosystems Group 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan.(38)(*)
|
|
10
|
.72
|
|
Life Technologies Corporation Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan.(38)(*)
|
|
10
|
.73
|
|
Life Technologies Corporation Amended and Restated 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan.(39)(*)
|
|
10
|
.74
|
|
Life Technologies Corporation 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(39)(*)
|
|
10
|
.75
|
|
Life Technologies Corporation 2010 Incentive Compensation
Plan.(6)(*)
|
|
10
|
.76
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units under 2009
Equity Incentive Plan.(6)(*)
|
|
10
|
.77
|
|
Consulting Agreement between William S. Shanahan and Life
Technologies Corporation, dated as of June 30, 2010.(40)(*)
|
|
10
|
.78
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under 2009 Equity
Incentive Plan.(*)
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
101
|
. INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
. SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
101
|
. CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
101
|
. DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
101
|
. LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase
|
|
101
|
. PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on February 17, 2010 (File
No. 000-25317). |
121
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on June 16, 2008 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on June 16, 2008 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on September 10, 2008 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on May 3, 2010 (File
No. 000-25317),
as amended. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 27, 2009 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on October 18, 2010 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-68665). |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-3,
filed on October 29, 2003. (File No.
333-110060). |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2004 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 (File No.
000-25317),
as amended. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on June 24, 2005 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on February 19, 2010 (File No.
000-25317). |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
filed on December 10, 1998 (File No.
333-68665). |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended June 30, 2000 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on March 30, 2001 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2001 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 (File No.
000-25317),
as amended. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-8,
filed on May 30, 2003 (File No.
333-105730). |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended June 30, 2004 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2004. (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on October 18, 2004 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(24) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 8-K,
filed on October 27, 2004 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(25) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 31, 2005 (File
No. 000-25317). |
122
|
|
|
(26) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on February 14, 2005 (File No.
000-25317). |
|
(27) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 to Annual
Report of Applied Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended June 30, 2005 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(28) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 11, 2005 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(29) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(30) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on April 27, 2006 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(31) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended June 30, 2006 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(32) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(33) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on March 2, 2007 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(34) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report of Applied
Biosystems Inc. on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007 (File
No. 001-04389). |
|
(35) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on August 1, 2007 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(36) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 4, 2008 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(37) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 28, 2008 (File No.
000-25317). |
|
(38) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-8,
filed on December 2, 2008 (File No.
333-155809). |
|
(39) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Proxy
Statement, filed on March 20, 2009 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(40) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Proxy
Statement, filed on June 30, 2010 (File
No. 000-25317). |
|
(*) |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
123