UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2008

 

OR

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file no. 1-8598

 

Belo Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 977-6606

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  Series B Common Stock, $1.67 par value

(Title of class)                                             

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Act) Yes  X   No   

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act Yes     No  X 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X   No   

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

 

(Do not check in a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes     No  X 

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by nonaffiliates on June 30, 2008, based on the closing price for the registrant’s Series A Common Stock on such date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $651,468,216. *

 

Shares of Common Stock outstanding at January 31, 2009: 102,204,200 shares. (Consisting of 89,185,007 shares of Series A Common Stock and 13,019,193 shares of Series B Common Stock.)

 

* For purposes of this calculation, the market value of a share of Series B Common Stock was assumed to be the same as the share of Series A Common Stock into which it is convertible.

 

Documents incorporated by reference:

 

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement, prepared pursuant to Regulation 14A, relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 12, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this report.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 1 

 

 

BELO CORP.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

PAGE 2  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

 

Belo Corp. (Belo or the Company), a Delaware corporation, began as a Texas newspaper company in 1842 and today is one of the nation’s largest publicly-traded pure-play television companies. The Company owns 20 television stations (nine in the top 25 U.S. markets) that reach 14 percent of U.S. television households, including ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CW and MyNetwork TV (MNTV) affiliates, and their associated Web sites, in 15 highly-attractive markets across the United States. The Company also manages one television station through a local marketing agreement (LMA), owns two local and two regional cable news channels and holds ownership interests in two other cable news channels.

 

The Company believes the success of its media franchises is built upon providing the highest quality local and regional news, entertainment programming and service to the communities in which they operate. These principles have built durable relationships with viewers, advertisers and online users and have guided Belo’s success.

 

Spin-off of A. H. Belo Corporation

 

On February 8, 2008, the Company completed the spin-off of its former newspaper businesses and related assets into a separate public company, A. H. Belo Corporation (A. H. Belo), which has its own management and board of directors. The spin-off was accomplished by transferring the subject assets and liabilities to A. H. Belo and distributing a pro-rata, tax-free dividend to the Company’s shareholders of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series B common stock, owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008.

 

Except as noted below, the Company has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any newspaper businesses or related assets, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in the Company or any television station businesses or related assets. Belo did not recognize any revenues or costs generated by A. H. Belo that would have been included in its financial results were it not for the spin-off. Belo’s relationship with A. H. Belo is governed primarily by a separation and distribution agreement, a services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, and certain other agreements between the two companies or their respective subsidiaries as further discussed below. Belo and A. H. Belo also co-own certain downtown Dallas, Texas real estate and other investment assets and have some overlap in board members and shareholders. Although the services related to these agreements generate continuing cash flows between Belo and A. H. Belo, the amounts are not considered to be significant to the ongoing operations of either company. In addition, the agreements and other relationships do not provide Belo with the ability to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of A. H. Belo and, therefore, do not constitute significant continuing involvement.

 

The historical operations of the newspaper businesses and related assets are included in discontinued operations in the Company’s financial statements. See Item 7–Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Spin off of A. H. Belo for additional information regarding the spin-off.

 

Continuing Operations

 

The Company’s television broadcasting operations began in 1950 with the acquisition of WFAA-TV in Dallas/Fort Worth, shortly after the station began operations. During the next 53 years, through various transactions, Belo acquired 18 additional television stations in 14 markets across the United States, bringing the total owned television stations to 19. In February 2007, Belo purchased its 20th television station. Belo also manages one station through a local marketing agreement (LMA) in San Antonio, Texas, and has joint marketing and shared services agreements with the owner and operator of KFWD-TV, licensed to Fort Worth, Texas.

 

Belo is one of the nation’s largest publicly-traded pure-play television companies. In the 15 U.S. markets in which Belo’s television stations operate, 10 of Belo’s stations are ranked number one and two are ranked number two (including stations tied with one or more other stations in the market) in “sign-on/sign-off” audience rating, based on the November 2008 Nielsen Media Research report. Belo has six stations in the 14 largest U.S. markets and 14 stations in the 50 largest U.S. markets.

 

Belo’s stations are concentrated primarily in three high-population growth regions: Texas, the Northwest and the Southwest. Six of the Company’s stations are located in the following four major metropolitan areas in the United States:

 

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 3 

 

 

Belo’s television stations have been recognized with numerous local, state and national awards for outstanding news coverage. Since 1957, Belo’s television stations have garnered 25 Alfred I. duPont-Columbia Awards, 21 George Foster Peabody Awards, and 35 Edward R. Murrow Awards–the industry’s most prestigious honors. On January 23, 2009, WFAA, Belo’s Dallas/Fort Worth station, made history as the only local television station to ever receive the prestigious Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Gold Baton award. It is also the first Gold Baton award given since 2003.

 

The following table sets forth information for the Company’s television stations (including the station operated through an LMA) and regional cable channels and their markets as of December 31, 2008:

 

 

 

The principal source of revenue for Belo’s television stations is the sale of airtime to local, regional and national advertisers. Generally, rates for national and local spot advertising sold by the Company are determined by each station, and the station receives all of the revenues, net of agency commissions, for that advertising. Rates are influenced by the demand for advertising time. This demand is influenced by a variety of factors, including the size and demographics of the local population, the concentration of retail stores, local economic conditions in general, and the popularity of the station’s programming. In 2008, approximately 86.4 percent of the Company’s total revenues were derived from spot advertising with the largest percentage of the spot advertising revenues generated from the automotive category which accounted for approximately 19.5 percent of total revenues in 2008.

 

Web sites of each of the Company’s television stations provide consumers with accurate and timely news and information as well as a variety of other products and services. Belo obtains immediate feedback through online communication with its audience, which allows the Company to tailor the way in which it delivers news and information to serve the needs of its audience. According to fourth quarter 2008 comScore Ratings, the Company has three of the top 50 local television-affiliated

 

 

PAGE 4  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Web sites in the U.S. Revenues for the Company’s interactive media in 2008 represented 4.5 percent of the Company’s advertising revenues and were derived principally from advertising on the various Company Web sites.

 

Pursuant to FCC rules, every three years local television stations must elect to either (1) require cable and/or direct broadcast satellite operators to carry the stations’ signal or (2) enter into retransmission consent negotiations for carriage. At present, Belo has retransmission consent agreements with the majority of cable operators and the primary satellite providers for carriage of its television stations and cable news channels, with some agreements having terms of more than three years. Approximately 4.5 percent of total television station revenues were derived from retransmission fees in 2008. The revenue received from retransmission agreements is recorded as other revenue in the Company’s financial statements.

 

The Company has a balanced portfolio of broadcast network-affiliated stations, with four ABC affiliates, four NBC affiliates and five CBS affiliates, and at least one large-market station associated with each network. As such, Belo’s revenue streams are not significantly affected by which broadcast network leads in the primetime ratings. Belo also owns two independent (IND) stations, two CW affiliates, two MNTV affiliates and one FOX affiliate, and operates one additional CW affiliate through an LMA.

 

The Company has network affiliation agreements with ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CW and MNTV. The Company’s network affiliation agreements generally provide the station with the exclusive right to broadcast over the air in its local service area all programs transmitted by the network with which the station is affiliated. In return, the network has the right to sell most of the advertising time during such broadcasts. In connection with these network affiliation agreements, the Company’s stations may receive network compensation for broadcasting network programming. Each of these agreements has a stated expiration date. Some of the networks with which our stations are affiliated may require, as a condition to the renewal of affiliation agreements, the elimination of network affiliate compensation and, in some cases, cash payments to the network, and the acceptance of other material modifications of existing affiliation agreements. Approximately 2.1 percent of the Company’s revenues were derived from network compensation in 2008. Network compensation is expected to decline over time.

 

The Company also owns two regional cable news operations, Texas Cable News (TXCN) in Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, and Northwest Cable News (NWCN) in Seattle, Washington, and two local cable news operations, 24/7 NewsChannel (24/7) in Boise, Idaho and NewsWatch on Channel 15 in New Orleans, Louisiana. These operations provide news coverage in a comprehensive 24-hour a day format using the news resources of the Company’s television stations in Texas, Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Louisiana. The Company also operates, through joint ventures, two cable news channels in partnership with Cox Communications and other parties that provide local news coverage in Phoenix, Arizona (Arizona NewsChannel) and Hampton/Norfolk, Virginia (Local News on Cable). These cable news channels use the news resources of the television stations owned by the Company in those markets. During 2008, approximately 2.2 percent of the Company’s revenues were derived from Belo’s cable news operations and consisted primarily of advertising and subscriber-based fees.

 

Competition for audience share and advertising revenues at Belo’s television stations and cable news operations is primarily related to programming content and advertising rates. The four major national television networks (ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX) are represented in each television market in which Belo has a television station. Competition for advertising sales and local viewers within each market is intense, particularly among the network-affiliated television stations. Where Belo owns more than one television station or cable news operation within a region or market, such businesses may compete with each other for national, regional and local advertising. Additionally, the Company’s competitors include other broadcast stations, cable and satellite television channels, local, regional and national newspapers, magazines, radio, direct mail, yellow pages, the Internet, mobile devices and other media. Advertising rates are set based upon a program’s popularity, the size of the market served, the availability of alternative advertising media and the number of advertisers competing for the available time.

 

FCC Regulation

 

General.     Belo’s television broadcast operations are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Among other things, the Communications Act empowers the FCC to (1) issue, renew, revoke and modify station licenses; (2) regulate stations’ technical operations and equipment; and (3) impose penalties for violations of the Communications Act or FCC regulations. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of a broadcast license or the transfer of control of a broadcast licensee without prior FCC approval.

 

Station Licenses.     The FCC grants television station licenses for terms of up to eight years. A television license must be renewed if the FCC finds that: (1) the station has served the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (2) there have been no serious violations by the licensee of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules and regulations; and (3) there have been no other violations by the licensee of the Communications Act or the FCC’s rules and regulations that taken together,

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 5 

 

constitute a pattern of abuse. License renewal applications for KHOU, WFAA and KSKN are currently pending. Under the FCC’s rules, a license expiration date is automatically extended pending review and grant of the renewal application. The current license expiration dates for each of Belo’s television broadcast stations are listed below.

 

 

 

The FCC licenses for stations KCWX and KFWD, to which the Company provides certain programming and other services, but is not the FCC licensee, expire August 1, 2014.

 

Programming and Operations.     Rules and policies of the FCC and other federal agencies regulate certain programming practices and other areas affecting the business and operations of broadcast stations.

 

The Children’s Television Act of 1990 limits commercial matter in children’s television programs and requires stations to provide at least three hours of children’s educational programming per week on their analog channels. The FCC has determined that the amount of children’s educational programming a digital television, or DTV, broadcaster must air will increase proportionally with the number of free video programming streams it broadcasts simultaneously or multicasts. The FCC also restricts commercialization of children’s programming, including certain promotions of other programs and displays of Web site addresses during children’s programming.

 

In November 2007, the FCC adopted an order imposing new public file and public interest reporting requirements on broadcasters. These new requirements must be approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before they become effective, and the OMB has not yet approved them. Therefore, it is unclear when, if ever, these rules will be implemented. Pursuant to these new requirements, stations with Web sites will be obligated to make certain portions of their public inspection files available online and broadcast notifications on how to access the public file. Stations also will be required to file quarterly a new, standardized form that will track various types and quantities of local programming. The form will require, among other things, information about programming related to local civic affairs, local electoral affairs, public service announcements, and independently-produced programming. The new standardized form will significantly increase recordkeeping requirements for television broadcasters. Several station owners and other interested parties have asked the FCC to reconsider the new reporting requirements and have sought to postpone their implementation. In addition, the order imposing the new rules is currently on appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

 

In December 2007, the FCC issued a Report on Broadcast Localism and a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The report tentatively concluded that broadcast licensees should be required to have regular meetings with permanent local advisory boards to ascertain the needs and interests of communities. The report also tentatively adopted specific renewal application processing guidelines that would require broadcasters to air a minimum amount of local programming. The report sought comment on a variety of other issues concerning localism, including potential changes to the main studio rule, network affiliation rules, and sponsorship identification rules. The period for submitting comments on the rules proposed in this report closed in June 2008, but the FCC has not yet issued a final order on the matter. Belo cannot predict whether the FCC will codify some or all of the specific localism initiatives discussed in the report.

 

The FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity rules impose job information dissemination, recruitment, documentation and reporting requirements. Broadcasters are subject to random audits to ensure compliance with the Equal Employment Opportunity rules and could be sanctioned for noncompliance.

 

The FCC has increased its enforcement efforts regarding broadcast indecency and profanity over the past few years. In June 2006, the statutory maximum fine for broadcast indecency material increased from $33 to $325 per incident. Several judicial appeals of FCC indecency enforcement actions are currently pending, and their outcomes could affect future FCC policies in this area.

 

 

PAGE 6  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Digital Television.     In 1997, the FCC adopted rules for implementing DTV service. With certain limited exceptions, broadcasters holding licenses or construction permits for full-power television stations were temporarily assigned a second channel in order to provide DTV programming. Currently, all full-power stations licensed to Belo are broadcasting digitally. On February 11, 2009, President Obama signed the DTV Delay Act of 2009 (Delay Act) into law, extending the DTV transition deadline from February 17, 2009 to June 12, 2009. Stations are allowed to transition prior to June 12, 2009 if they so choose, unless the FCC objects. At the end of the DTV transition, analog television programming will cease, television broadcasters will surrender their analog spectrum to the government, and unused DTV channels will be reassigned to a smaller segment of the broadcast spectrum.

 

Broadcasters may either provide a single DTV signal or “multicast” several lower resolution DTV program streams. Broadcasters also may use some of their digital spectrum to provide non-broadcast “ancillary” services (i.e., subscription video, data transfer or audio signals), provided broadcasters pay the government a fee of five percent of gross revenues received from such services. Under the FCC’s rules relating to must-carry rights of digital broadcasters, which apply to cable and certain DBS systems: (1) broadcasters are not entitled to carriage of both their analog and their digital streams during the transition; (2) digital-only stations are entitled to must-carry rights; and (3) a digital-only station asserting must-carry rights is entitled to carriage of only a single programming stream and other “program related” content, even if the digital-only station multicasts. In November 2007, the FCC decided that after the transition, cable operators must ensure that all analog cable subscribers will continue to be able to receive the signals of stations electing must-carry status. Cable operators can choose either to deliver the signal in digital format for digital customers and “down convert” the signal to analog format for analog customers, or to deliver the signal in digital format to all subscribers but ensure that all subscribers with analog sets have set-top boxes that will convert the digital signal to analog format.

 

In December 2007, the FCC established policies to facilitate broadcasters’ construction of their final digital facilities by the transition deadline. Additionally, the FCC finalized most broadcasters’ post-transition DTV channel assignments in the Spring of 2008. The FCC also imposed consumer education requirements on broadcasters, effective March 31, 2008. Finally, Congress has charged the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) with implementing a $1,500,000 program to provide digital converter boxes to American households that do not have DTV sets or television sets connected to cable or satellite. Additional federal funds for the converter box program were authorized in connection with the Delay Act.

 

Cable and Satellite Transmission of Local Television Signals.     Under FCC regulations, cable systems must devote a specified portion of their channel capacity to the carriage of the signals of local television stations. Television stations may elect between “must-carry rights” or a right to restrict or prevent cable systems from carrying the station’s signal without the station’s permission (retransmission consent). Stations must make this election once every three years, and did so most recently on October 1, 2008. All broadcast stations that made carriage decisions on October 1, 2008, will be bound by their decisions through the 2009-2011 cycle and will not be allowed to change their carriage decisions at the end of the DTV transition in June 2009. The FCC has established a market-specific requirement for mandatory carriage of local television stations by direct broadcast satellite, or DBS, operators, similar to that applicable to cable systems, for those markets in which a DBS carrier provides any local signal. In addition, the FCC has adopted rules relating to station eligibility for DBS carriage and subscriber eligibility for receiving signals. There are also specific statutory requirements relating to satellite distribution of distant network signals to “unserved households” (i.e., households that do not receive at least a Grade B signal from a local network affiliate). One important law governing DBS distribution, the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization Act of 2004 (SHVERA), expires at the end of 2009 unless new legislation is adopted by Congress to extend such law.

 

Ownership Rules.     The FCC’s ownership rules affect the number, type and location of broadcast and newspaper properties that Belo may hold or acquire. The rules now in effect limit the common ownership, operation, or control of television stations serving the same area; television and radio stations serving the same area; and television stations and daily newspapers serving the same area; as well as the aggregate national audience of commonly-owned television stations. The FCC’s rules also define the types of positions and interests that are considered attributable for purposes of the ownership limits, and thus also apply to certain Belo principals and investors.

 

In addition, the Communications Act prohibits direct or indirect record ownership of a broadcast licensee or the power to vote more than one-fourth of the stock of a company controlling a licensee from being held by aliens, foreign governments or their representatives, or corporations formed under the laws of foreign countries.

 

In September 2003, the FCC relaxed many of its ownership restrictions. However, on June 24, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit rejected many of the FCC’s 2003 rule changes. The court remanded the rules to the FCC for further proceedings and extended a stay on the implementation of the new rules that the court had imposed in September 2003. In December 2007, the FCC adopted a Report and Order that left most of the FCC’s pre-2003 ownership restrictions in place, but made modifications to the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership restriction. A number of parties appealed the FCC’s order, and those appeals were consolidated in the Third Circuit in November 2008 and remain pending.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 7 

 

 

The FCC’s December 2007 action left in place the FCC’s current local television ownership rules. Under those rules, one entity may own two commercial television stations in a Designated Market Area (DMA) if no more than one of those stations is ranked among the top four stations in the DMA and eight independently owned, full-power stations will remain in the DMA.

 

 

The newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule generally prohibits one entity from owning both a commercial broadcast station and a daily newspaper in the same community. For FCC purposes, the common officers, directors and five percent or greater voting shareholders of Belo and A. H. Belo are deemed to hold attributable interests in each of the companies. As a result, the business and conduct of one company may have the effect of limiting the activities or strategic business alternatives available to the other company.

 

The radio/television cross-ownership rule allows a party to own one or two TV stations and a varying number of radio stations within a single market. The FCC’s December 2007 decision leaves the newspaper/broadcast and radio/television cross-ownership prohibitions in place, but provides that the FCC will evaluate newly proposed newspaper/broadcast combinations under a non-exhaustive list of four public interest factors. The FCC will apply a presumption that the combination is in the public interest if it is located in a top 20 DMA and involves the combination of a newspaper and only one television station or radio station. If the combination involves a television station, the presumption will apply only where the station is not among the top 4 in the DMA and at least eight independently owned and operated newspapers and/or full-power commercial television stations remain in the DMA. All other combinations will be presumed not in the public interest. That negative presumption can be reversed if the combination will result in a new local news source that provides at least seven hours of local news programming or if the property being acquired has failed or is failing.

 

 

The maximum percentage of U.S. households that a single owner can reach through commonly owned television stations is 39 percent and is not affected by the FCC’s December 2007 decision.

 

The foregoing does not purport to be a complete summary of the Communications Act, other applicable statutes or the FCC’s rules, regulations and policies. Proposals for additional or revised regulations and requirements are pending before, and are considered by, Congress and federal regulatory agencies from time to time. Belo cannot predict the effect of existing and proposed federal legislation, regulations and policies on its business. Also, several of the foregoing matters (e.g., the media ownership rules and the new reporting rules) are now, or may become, the subject of litigation and Belo cannot predict the outcome of any such litigation or the effect on its business.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately 2,553 full-time and 363 part-time employees, including approximately 594 employees represented by various employee unions. Belo believes its relations with its employees are satisfactory.

 

Available Information

 

Belo maintains its corporate Web site at www.belo.com. Belo makes available free of charge on www.belo.com this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, the Company’s current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to all those reports, all as filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

 

 

Sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and management’s public comments and press releases from time to time may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on management’s current knowledge and estimates of factors affecting our operations, both known and unknown. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking information as actual results may differ materially from those currently

 

 

PAGE 8  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

anticipated. The following discussion identifies some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. In addition, a number of other factors (those identified elsewhere in this document and others, both known and unknown) may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.

 

Decreases in advertising spending resulting from economic downturns, natural disasters, war, terrorism or other factors specific to the communities we serve can adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our revenues are subject to seasonal, cyclical and other fluctuations that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

A substantial majority of our revenues are generated from the sale of local, regional and national advertising. Advertisers generally reduce their advertising spending during economic downturns, so a recession or economic downturn could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The worldwide economy is currently undergoing unprecedented turmoil amid stock market volatility, tightening credit markets, inflation and deflation concerns, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions, and increased liquidity concerns and business insolvencies. This turmoil and uncertainty about future economic conditions could negatively impact our advertisers and cause them to postpone their advertising decision-making or decrease their advertising spending, among other things, which could adversely affect our business. Uncertainty about current global economic conditions could also affect the volatility of our stock price. We cannot predict the timing, magnitude or duration of the current (or any future) severe global economic downturn or subsequent recovery.

 

Our ability to generate advertising revenues is and will continue to be affected by financial market conditions, consumer confidence, advertiser challenges and changes in the national and sometimes international economy, as well as by regional economic conditions in each of the markets in which our stations operate. We have a significant concentration of assets in Texas, the Northwest and Arizona, which makes the economic condition of these regions of particular consequence to our financial condition and results of operations. The amount of advertisers’ budgets, which are affected by broad economic trends, affect the broadcast industry in general and the revenues of individual broadcast television stations in particular. Advertisers have purchased less advertising time from our stations in recent months due to the current decline in the national economy, as well as in regional economies.

 

Our advertising revenues depend upon a variety of other factors specific to the communities that we serve. Changes in those factors could negatively affect advertising revenues. These factors include, among others, the size and demographic characteristics of the local population, the concentration of retail stores and other businesses, and local economic conditions in general. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2008, 19.5 percent of our television advertising revenues were generated from the automotive industry. The economic challenges of the automotive industry will continue to affect its advertising spending which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.

 

Our revenues and results of operations are subject to seasonal, cyclical and other fluctuations that we expect to continue in future periods. In particular, we typically experience fluctuations in our revenues between even and odd numbered years. During elections for various state and national offices, which are primarily in even numbered years, advertising revenues tend to increase based on the demand for political advertising in our markets. Advertising revenues in odd numbered years tend to be less than in even numbered years due to the lack of demand for political advertising in our markets. Also, since NBC has exclusive rights to broadcast the Olympics through 2012, our NBC affiliate stations typically experience increased viewership and revenues during Olympic broadcasts, which also occur in even numbered years. Other seasonal and cyclical factors that affect our revenues and results of operations may be beyond our control, including changes in the pricing policies of our competitors, the hiring and retention of key personnel, wage and cost pressures and general economic factors. Fluctuations in revenues and results of operations may cause our stock price to be volatile.

 

Our television businesses operate in highly competitive markets, and our ability to maintain market share and generate revenues depends on how effectively we compete with existing and new competition.

 

Our television businesses operate in highly competitive markets. Our television stations compete for audiences and advertising revenue with newspapers and other broadcast and cable television stations, as well as with other media such as magazines, telephone and/or wireless companies, satellite television and the Internet. Some of our current and potential competitors may have greater financial, marketing, programming and broadcasting resources than we do and the ability to distribute more targeted advertising. Cable companies and others have developed national advertising networks in recent years that increase the competition for national advertising.

 

Our television stations compete for audiences and advertising revenues primarily on the basis of programming content and advertising rates. Advertising rates are set based upon a variety of factors, including a program’s popularity among the advertiser’s target audience, the number of advertisers competing for the available time, the size and demographic make-up

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 9 

 

of the market served and the availability of alternative advertising in the market. Our ability to maintain market share and competitive advertising rates depends in part on audience acceptance of our network, syndicated and local programming. Changes in market demographics, the entry of competitive stations into our markets, the transition to Local People Meters and other methods for measuring audiences, the introduction of competitive local news or other programming by cable, satellite, Internet, telephone or wireless providers, or the adoption of competitive offerings by existing and new providers could result in lower ratings and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

If we are unable to respond to changes in technology and evolving industry trends, our television businesses may not be able to compete effectively.

 

New technologies could also adversely affect our television stations. Information delivery and programming alternatives such as cable, direct satellite-to-home services, pay-per-view, the Internet, telephone company services, mobile devices, digital video recorders and home video and entertainment systems have fractionalized television viewing audiences and expanded the numbers and types of distribution channels for advertisers to access. Over the past decade, cable television programming services, other emerging video distribution platforms and the Internet have captured an increasing market share, while the aggregate viewership of the major television networks has declined. In addition, the expansion of cable and satellite television, the Internet and other technological changes have increased, and may continue to increase, the competitive demand for programming. Such increased demand, together with rising production costs, may increase our programming costs or impair our ability to acquire or develop desired programming.

 

In addition, video compression techniques, now in use with direct broadcast satellites and potentially soon for cable and wireless cable, are expected to permit greater numbers of channels to be carried within existing bandwidth. These compression techniques as well as other technological developments are applicable to all video delivery systems, including over-the-air broadcasting, and have the potential to provide vastly expanded programming to targeted audiences. Reduction in the cost of creating additional channel capacity could lower entry barriers for new channels and encourage the development of increasingly specialized niche programming, resulting in more audience fractionalization. This ability to reach very narrowly defined audiences may alter the competitive dynamics for advertising expenditures. We are unable to predict the effect that these and other technological changes will have on the television industry or on the future results of our television businesses.

 

The costs of television programming may increase, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Programming is a significant operating cost in our television businesses. We cannot be certain that we will not be exposed to future increases in programming costs. Should such an increase occur, it could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, television networks have been seeking arrangements with their affiliates to share the networks’ programming costs and to eliminate network compensation traditionally paid to broadcast affiliates. We cannot predict the nature or scope of any such potential compensation arrangements or the effect, if any, on our operations. Acquisitions of program rights for syndicated programming are usually made two or three years in advance and may require multi-year commitments, making it difficult to predict accurately how a program will perform. In addition, any significant shortfall, now or in the future, in advertising revenue and/or the expected popularity of the programming for which the Company has acquired rights could lead to less than expected revenue which could result in programming write-offs. Additionally, in some instances, programs must be replaced before their costs have been fully amortized, resulting in write-offs. These write-offs increase station operating costs and decrease station earnings.

 

The loss or modification of network affiliation agreements and changes by the national networks in their respective business models and practices could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The non-renewal, termination or material modification of our network affiliation agreements could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. We have four stations affiliated with ABC, five stations affiliated with CBS, four stations affiliated with NBC, three stations affiliated with CW, two stations affiliated with My Network TV and one station affiliated with FOX. Each of the big-three networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) generally provides our affiliated stations with 22 hours of prime time programming per week. Each of our affiliation agreements has a stated expiration date. Some of the networks with which our stations are affiliated may require, as a condition to the renewal of affiliation agreements, elimination of network affiliate compensation and, in some cases, cash payments to the network, and the acceptance of other material modifications of existing affiliation agreements. Consequently, our affiliation agreements may not all remain in place under existing terms and each network may not continue to provide programming or compensation to affiliates on the same basis as it currently provides programming or compensation. If this occurs, we would need to find alternative sources of programming, which may be less attractive and more expensive.

 

 

PAGE 10  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

In recent years, the networks have streamed their programming on the Internet and other distribution platforms in close proximity to network programming broadcast on local television stations, including those owned by the Company. These and other practices by the networks dilute the exclusivity and value of network programming originally broadcast by local stations and could adversely affect our stations’ results of operations.

 

If we are unable to secure or maintain carriage of our television stations’ signals over cable and/or direct broadcast satellite systems, our television stations may not be able to compete effectively.

 

Pursuant to the FCC rules, local television stations must elect every three years to either (1) require cable and/or direct broadcast satellite operators to carry the stations’ analog signals or (2) enter into retransmission consent negotiations for carriage. At present, Belo has retransmission consent agreements with the major cable operators in its markets and both satellite providers. If our retransmission consent agreements are terminated or not renewed, or if our broadcast signals are distributed on less favorable terms than our competitors, our ability to compete effectively may be adversely affected. Unless negotiated, cable and direct satellite operators are not required to carry our digital broadcast signals prior to the digital television transition. If we are unable to reach agreements for the carriage of those signals or if those signals are distributed on less favorable terms than our competitors, our ability to compete effectively may be adversely affected.

 

Our stock price can be volatile.

 

Because of the various factors which affect our business and the uncertainty of future economic conditions, our revenues, results of operations and prospects fluctuate, which may cause our stock price to be volatile. The volumes of daily trades in our stock typically exceed the daily volumes experienced prior to the spin-off. In recent months, our stock price has traded at times below $2.00 per share. If our stock price were to trade at less than $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days, the NYSE could seek to de-list our stock. The NYSE has currently suspended application of this rule until June 30, 2009. If the NYSE were to apply this rule, we may be required to take action, such as implementing a reverse stock split, to increase the trading price of our stock above $1.00 per share or seek to qualify our stock for trading on the NASDAQ system as an alternative to the NYSE listing. Because of overall market conditions, a number of companies, including some of our peers, are currently addressing similar matters.

 

Regulatory changes may affect our strategy and increase competition and operating costs in our media businesses.

 

As described in this Item 1–Business–FCC Regulation, our television businesses are subject to extensive and changing federal regulation. Changes in current regulations or the adoption of new laws and policies could affect our strategy, increase competition and our operating costs, and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Among other things, the Communications Act and FCC rules and policies govern the term, renewal and transfer of our television broadcasting licenses and limit certain concentrations of broadcasting control and ownership of multiple television stations. Relaxation of ownership restrictions may provide a competitive advantage to those with greater financial and other resources than we possess. Federal law also regulates indecency on broadcast television, political advertising rates and children’s programming.

 

The television industry is transitioning from analog to digital transmissions and Congress recently moved the final date from February 17, 2009 to June 12, 2009, as the date by which broadcasters must cease analog program broadcasts and return their analog spectrum to the government. The delay in the transition will allow viewers more time to obtain more converter box coupons and will provide additional time to prepare for the digital switchover. The impact of the delay cannot be fully determined. At a minimum, viewer confusion will likely exist, requiring broadcasters and others to commit more resources to meeting audience needs.

 

SHVERA establishes a statutory copyright license to enable direct broadcast satellite (DBS) companies to provide programming to local broadcasters and viewers. SHVERA expires at the end of 2009 and must be renewed or otherwise addressed to avoid significant disruption in the DBS business. If Congress passes legislation materially changing the existing regulatory scheme or adopts new legislation in place of existing law, the Company and other local broadcasters and viewers could be adversely affected. Furthermore, since SHVERA must be addressed in 2009, it is likely that other legislation, possibly unrelated to SHVERA, could be added to the required legislation which may or may not affect the Company in a material manner.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 11 

 

Adverse results from pending or new litigation or governmental proceedings or investigations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

 

From time to time we and our subsidiaries are subject to litigation and governmental proceedings and investigations. Current matters include those described under Item 3–Legal Proceedings. Adverse determinations in any of these pending or future matters could require us to make monetary payments or result in other sanctions or findings that could adversely affect our businesses, including renewal of our FCC licenses, and financial condition and results of operations.

 

If we cannot renew our FCC broadcast licenses, our broadcast operations will be impaired.

 

Our television businesses depend upon maintaining our broadcast licenses, which are issued by the FCC. Our broadcast licenses expired or will expire between 2006 and 2015 (although those that have already expired have been extended by the filing of a license renewal application with the FCC) and are renewable. Interested parties may challenge a renewal application. The FCC has the authority to revoke licenses, not renew them, or renew them only with significant qualifications, including renewals for less than a full term. Although we expect to renew all our FCC licenses, we cannot assure investors that our future renewal applications will be approved, or that the renewals will not include conditions or qualifications that could adversely affect our operations. If we fail to renew any of our licenses, it could prevent us from operating the affected stations. If we renew our licenses with substantial conditions or modifications (including renewing one or more of our licenses for a term of fewer than eight years), it could have a material adverse effect on the affected station’s revenue generation potential.

 

Belo may incur increased expenses or liabilities if some of the agreements with A. H. Belo are terminated or if A. H. Belo fails to perform.

 

In connection with the spin-off, Belo entered into a services agreement with A. H. Belo. If the agreement is terminated, Belo may be required to obtain needed services from third parties. This could affect the efficiency of Belo’s operations in the near-term or be more expensive than the fees that Belo is currently required to pay under the A. H. Belo agreement.

 

Also in connection with the spin-off, Belo and A. H. Belo agreed to share certain liabilities and expenses and to indemnify each other for certain expenses and liabilities attributable to one company or the other. For example, Belo agreed to retain complete sponsorship of The G. B. Dealey Retirement Pension Plan rather than divide the plan into two separate plans and in return, A. H. Belo agreed to reimburse Belo for 60 percent of all cash contributions made by Belo to the plan. The sharing ratio approximates the relative number of plan participants associated with each company. If A. H. Belo does not reimburse Belo promptly for its share of future plan contributions, Belo will be required to fund all of the contributions and seek reimbursement from A. H. Belo.

 

In addition, A. H. Belo assumed Belo’s liabilities relating to certain ongoing agreements and other matters. If A. H. Belo does not satisfy these contingent liabilities when due, it is possible that Belo may be required to satisfy them. While Belo is not expecting to be called on to meet any of these contingent obligations, if it were to happen, it could adversely affect Belo’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

Certain members of management, directors and shareholders may face actual or potential conflicts of interest.

 

The Company and A. H. Belo have several common directors. Most of the management and directors of Belo and A. H. Belo own both Belo common stock and A. H. Belo common stock. This ownership overlap and these common directors could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when Belo’s and A. H. Belo’s management and directors face decisions that could have different implications for each company. For example, potential conflicts of interest could arise in connection with the resolution of any dispute between Belo and A. H. Belo regarding the terms of the agreements governing the spin-off and the relationship between Belo and A. H. Belo thereafter. Potential conflicts of interest could also arise out of any commercial arrangements that Belo and A. H. Belo may enter into in the future.

 

We depend on key personnel, and we may not be able to operate and grow our businesses effectively if we lose the services of any of our senior executive officers or are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future.

 

We depend on the efforts of our senior executive officers. The success of our business depends heavily on our ability to retain our current management and to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Competition for senior management personnel is intense and we may not be able to retain our key personnel. We have not entered into employment agreements with our key management personnel and we do not have “key person” insurance for any of our senior executive officers or other key personnel.

 

 

PAGE 12  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

We have a large amount of indebtedness. Access to our existing credit facility requires that we meet several covenants, which could be more challenging in a difficult operating environment.

 

We currently use a portion of our operating cash flow for debt service. We may continue to borrow funds to finance capital expenditures, bond repurchases, acquisitions or to refinance debt, as well as for other purposes.

 

Our level of indebtedness could, for example:

 

 

In addition, our debt instruments require us to comply with certain covenants. At December 31, 2008, the maximum allowed leverage ratio was 5.75 and the minimum required interest coverage ratio was 2.25, as specified in our bank credit facility agreement. Effective February 26, 2009, the Company amended its credit facility agreement. Beginning February 26, 2009, through June 30, 2010, the maximum allowed leverage ratio is 6.25. The maximum allowed leverage ratio decreases by 50 basis points in the third quarter of 2010. Beginning December 31, 2010, and through the term of the agreement, the maximum allowed leverage ratio is 5.00. From January 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010, the minimum required interest coverage ratio is 2.25. Beginning April 1, 2010, the minimum required interest coverage ratio increases to 2.50. The failure to comply with the covenants in the agreements governing the terms of our indebtedness could be an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, would permit acceleration of all our indebtedness and payment obligations. See Item 7–Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources for further discussion on debt service.

 

Changes in accounting standards can significantly impact reported earnings and operating results.

 

Generally accepted accounting principles and accompanying pronouncements and implementation guidelines for many aspects of our business, including those related to intangible assets, pensions, income taxes, share-based compensation, and broadcast rights, are complex and involve significant judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation could significantly change our reported earnings and operating results. See Item 7–Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2–Recently Issued Accounting Standards.

 

We have a significant amount of intangible assets, and if we are required to write down intangible assets in future periods it would reduce net income.

 

Approximately 77.5 percent of our total assets as of December 31, 2008, consisted of intangible assets, principally broadcast licenses and goodwill. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” requires, among other things, an annual impairment testing of broadcast licenses and goodwill. Additionally, the Company continually evaluates whether current factors or indicators, such as the prevailing conditions in the economy and capital markets, require an interim impairment assessment of those assets, as well as of investments and long-lived assets. Recent trends in advertising revenues have negatively affected investors’ outlooks on the Company’s market value. If revenue trends worsen, this may be considered an indicator of impairment and could require the Company to perform an impairment analysis in advance of its annual impairment testing. In addition, any significant shortfall, now or in the future in advertising revenue could lead to a downward revision in the fair value of certain reporting units. A downward revision in the fair value of a reporting unit, indefinite-lived intangible assets, investments or long-lived assets could result in an impairment, and a non-cash charge would be required. Any such charge could be material to the Company’s reported net earnings. See Item 7–Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Critical Accounting Policies for further discussion of the goodwill and intangible asset assessment process and impairment charges recorded in 2008.

 

Failure of the spin-off to qualify as a tax-free transaction could result in substantial liability.

 

In connection with the spin-off, Belo received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to the effect that, among other things, the spin-off (including certain related transactions) qualifies as tax-free to Belo and Belo shareholders for United States federal income tax purposes. Although a private letter ruling generally is binding on the IRS,

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 13 

 

if the factual assumptions or representations made by Belo in the private letter ruling request are untrue or incomplete in any material respect, then Belo may not be able to rely on the ruling.

 

If the spin-off fails to qualify for tax-free treatment, a substantial corporate tax would be payable by Belo. However, A. H. Belo has agreed to indemnify Belo for certain tax liabilities under certain circumstances. Further, if the spin-off is not tax-free, each Belo shareholder generally would be taxed as if he or she had received a cash distribution equal to the fair market value of the shares of A. H. Belo common stock on the date of the spin-off.

 

 

None.

 

 

Television Station Properties

 

At December 31, 2008, Belo owned broadcast operating facilities in the following U.S. cities: Austin, Dallas, Houston and San Antonio, Texas; Seattle and Spokane, Washington; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Portland, Oregon; Charlotte, North Carolina; New Orleans, Louisiana; Norfolk, Virginia; Louisville, Kentucky, and Boise, Idaho. The Company leases broadcast facilities for operations in St. Louis, Missouri. Four of the Company’s broadcast facilities use primary broadcast towers that are jointly owned with another television station in the same market. The Company also leases broadcast towers in Tucson, Arizona for the digital transmission of KMSB-TV and for both the digital and analog transmission of KTTU-TV. The primary broadcast towers associated with the Company’s other television stations are wholly-owned by the Company.

 

The operations of the Company’s regional cable news businesses, TXCN and NWCN, are conducted from Company-owned broadcasting facilities in Dallas, Texas and Seattle, Washington, respectively.

 

The Company leases a facility in Washington, D.C. that is used for the gathering and distribution of news from the nation’s capital. This facility includes broadcast and production studios as well as general office space.

 

Corporate Properties

 

At December 31, 2008, the Company co-owned with A. H. Belo a 17-story office building in downtown Dallas, Texas, that houses the Company’s corporate operations and certain operations of A. H. Belo and its subsidiaries. In connection with the spin-off, this building and other downtown Dallas real estate were transferred to a limited liability company that is owned in equal parts by Belo and A. H. Belo.

 

In addition, in 2008, A. H. Belo and Belo consummated the exchange of certain real estate interests they and/or their subsidiaries owned in the approximate ten acre downtown campus jointly used by A. H. Belo’s The Dallas Morning News and Belo’s WFAA and Texas Cable News (TXCN). As a result of the exchange, The Dallas Morning News owns the building known as the TXCN Building on The Dallas Morning News/WFAA campus. Belo and its subsidiaries are vacating the TXCN Building and relocating those operations to other locations. Also, as part of the exchange, The Dallas Morning News has leased a parcel of land to Belo and WFAA under a long-term ground lease with an option to purchase for nominal value. As a result of the exchange, The Dallas Morning News owns various parcels of contiguous land containing the improvements that it uses in its operations, and WFAA and Belo own and lease under the ground lease contiguous parcels covering the land and improvements used by WFAA and TXCN. In addition, WFAA has entered into an arm’s-length lease with The Dallas Morning News for the lease of certain storage facilities in the parking garage located on Dallas Morning News property.

 

The Company has additional leasehold and other interests that are used in its activities, which interests are not material. The Company believes its properties are in satisfactory condition, are well maintained and are adequate for present operations.

 

 

Under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement between the Company and A. H. Belo, they will share equally in any liabilities, net of any applicable insurance, resulting from the circulation-related lawsuits described in the next two paragraphs below.

 

On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004, and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits, now consolidated, were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the

 

 

PAGE 14  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Company, Robert W. Decherd and Barry T. Peckham, a former executive officer of The Dallas Morning News. James M. Moroney III, an executive officer of The Dallas Morning News, was later added as a defendant. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News announced by the Company in 2004, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. No amount of damages has been specified. The plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004 and allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On April 2, 2008, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On April 16, 2008, plaintiffs filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit seeking permission to appeal that denial. On June 17, 2008, permission was granted, and plaintiffs are appealing the denial of class certification. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 2, 2009. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.

 

On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual shareholder of the Company in the 191st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W. Decherd, John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson, and James M. Moroney III; Barry T. Peckham; and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R. Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak and Arturo Madrid, current and former directors of the Company. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News. On May 30, 2007, after a prior discovery stay ended, the court issued an order administratively closing the case. Under the court’s order, the case is stayed and, as a result, no further action can be taken unless the case is reinstated. The court retained jurisdiction and the case is subject to being reinstated by the court or upon motion by any party. The court order was not a dismissal with prejudice.

 

Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, A. H. Belo has agreed to indemnify the Company for any liability arising out of the following lawsuit.

 

On October 24, 2006, 18 former employees of The Dallas Morning News filed a lawsuit against the The Dallas Morning News, the Company, and others in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The plaintiffs’ lawsuit alleges unlawful discrimination and ERISA violations and includes allegations relating to The Dallas Morning News circulation overstatement (similar to the circulation-related lawsuits described above). In June 2007, the court issued a memorandum order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to dismiss. In August 2007, the court dismissed certain additional claims. A trial date, originally set in January 2009, has been reset to April 2010. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.

 

In addition to the proceedings disclosed above, a number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition of the Company.

 

 

No matter was submitted to a vote of shareholders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

The Company’s authorized common equity consists of 450,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $1.67 per share. The Company has two series of common stock outstanding, Series A and Series B. Shares of the two series are identical in all respects except as noted herein. Series B shares are entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders; Series A shares are entitled to one vote per share. Transferability of the Series B shares is limited to family members and affiliated entities of the holder and Series B shares are convertible at any time on a one-for-one basis into Series A shares, and upon a transfer other than as described above, Series B shares automatically convert into Series A shares. Shares of the Company’s Series A common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE symbol: BLC). There is no established public trading market for shares of Series B common stock. See the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10–Common and Preferred Stock.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 15 

 

The following table lists the high and low trading prices and the closing prices for Series A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for each of the quarterly periods in the last two years, and cash dividends attributable to each quarter for both the Series A and Series B common stock. The first quarter 2008 and full year 2007 stock prices have been adjusted to reflect the spin-off of A. H. Belo.

 

 

On January 31, 2009, the closing price for the Company’s Series A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange was $1.43. The approximate number of shareholders of record of the Series A and Series B common stock at the close of business on such date was 570 and 278, respectively.

 

 

PAGE 16  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

The Company did not repurchase any Series A or Series B common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2008. See Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10–Common and Preferred Stock for share repurchase plan authorization information.

 

The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

 

The following graph compares (1) the annual cumulative shareholder return on an investment of $100 on December 31, 2003, in Belo’s Series A common stock, based on the market price of the Series A common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with (2) the cumulative total return of a similar investment in companies on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, with (3) the 2008 group of peer companies selected on a line-of-business basis and weighted for market capitalization and (4) the 2007 group of peer companies. As a result of the spin-off in 2008 of Belo’s newspaper businesses and related assets, Belo’s peer group companies have changed from companies that may have television stations and other media assets such as newspapers, to companies that are pure-play television companies like Belo. The chart below includes information regarding the previous peer group companies for reference. For 2008, the Company’s peer group includes the following companies: Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.; LIN TV Corp.; Gray Television; Nexstar Broadcasting Group; Sinclair Broadcasting Group; and Young Broadcasting Corporation. For 2007, the Company’s peer group included the following companies: Gannett Co., Inc.; Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.; Lee Enterprises, Inc.; LIN TV Corp.; McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.; Media General, Inc.; The New York Times Company; The E.W. Scripps Company; The Washington Post Company; and Young Broadcasting Corporation. Belo is not included in either calculation of peer group cumulative total shareholder return on investment.

 

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 17 

 

 

The following table presents selected financial data of the Company for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Certain amounts for the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. For a more complete understanding of this selected financial data, see Item 7–Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

 

 

 

The following information should be read in conjunction with the other sections of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Item–Business, Item 1A - Risk Factors, Item 6–Selected Financial Data, Item 7A–Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks, Item 9A–Controls and Procedures and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in Item 1A–Risk Factors.

 

All references to earnings per share represent diluted earnings per share.

 

Overview

 

Belo, a Delaware corporation, began as a Texas newspaper company in 1842 and today is one of the nation’s largest publicly-traded pure-play television companies. The Company owns 20 television stations (nine in the top 25 U.S. markets) that reach 14 percent of U.S. television households, including ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CW and MyNetwork TV affiliates, and their associated Web sites, in 15 highly-attractive markets across the United States. The Company also manages one television station through a local marketing agreement (LMA), and owns two local and two regional cable news channels and holds ownership interests in two other cable news channels.

 

The Company believes the success of its media franchises is built upon providing the highest quality local and regional news, entertainment programming and service to the communities in which they operate. These principles have built durable relationships with viewers, readers, advertisers and online users and have guided Belo’s success.

 

On February 8, 2008, the Company completed the spin-off of its former newspaper businesses and related assets into a separate public company, A. H. Belo, which has its own management and board of directors. The spin-off was accomplished by transferring the subject assets and liabilities to A. H. Belo and distributing a pro-rata, tax-free dividend to the Company’s shareholders of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series B common stock, owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion on the spin-off.

 

 

PAGE 18  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Except as otherwise noted, the Company has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any of the newspaper businesses or related assets, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in the Company or any television station businesses or related assets. The historical operations of the newspaper businesses and related assets are included in discontinued operations in the Company’s financial statements.

 

The Company intends for the discussion of its 2008 and prior period financial condition and results of operations that follows to provide information that will assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those statements from period to period and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles, policies and estimates affect the Company’s financial statements.

 

Results of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Consolidated Results of Operations

 

						Percentage								Percentage
Year Ended December 31,		2008				Change				2007				Change				2006
Net operating revenues		$	733,470				(5.6	)%		$	776,956				0.8	%		$	770,539
Impairment charges			464,760				1,999.5	%			22,137				100.0	%			—
Other operating costs and expenses			529,284				(4.9	)%			556,737				3.5	%			537,858
Total operating costs and expenses			994,044				71.7	%			578,874				7.6	%			537,858
Earnings (loss) from operations			(260,574	)			(231.5	)%			198,082				(14.9	)%			232,681
Other income (expense)			(63,247	)			(28.3	)%			(88,228	)			1.5	%			(86,964	)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes			(323,821	)			(394.8	)%			109,854				(24.6	)%			145,717
Income taxes			4,532				(90.8	)%			49,157				(2.3	)%			50,338
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$	(328,353	)			(641.0	)%		$	60,697				(36.4	)%		$	95,379

						Percentage								Percentage
Year Ended December 31,		2008				Change				2007				Change				2006
Non-political advertising		$	619,476				(13.0	)%		$	711,825				5.2	%		$	676,953
Political advertising			56,223				284.7	%			14,615				(68.9	)%			47,050
Other			57,771				14.4	%			50,516				8.6	%			46,536
Net operating revenues		$	733,470				(5.6	)%		$	776,956				0.8	%		$	770,539

 

Non-political advertising revenues decreased $92,349, or 13.0 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease is primarily due to a $95,832, or 14.2 percent, decrease in local and national spot revenue partially offset by a $3,785, or 14.1 percent, increase in advertising revenue generated from the television station’s Web sites as compared with the year ended December 31, 2007. Spot revenue decreases were noted in most categories, including the major categories of automotive, retail, entertainment, restaurants and home improvement. A few less significant categories such as consumer services and financial services showed increases versus the prior year. The decrease in non-political advertising revenue was partially offset by an increase in political advertising revenues. Political advertising revenues increased $41,608, or 284.7 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2007. Political revenues are generally higher in even numbered years than in odd numbered years due to elections for various state and national offices. Other revenues increased primarily due to an increase in retransmission revenues.

 

Non-political advertising revenues increased $34,872, or 5.2 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase is a combination of a $24,463, or 3.8 percent, increase in local and national spot revenue and a $7,767, or 40.9 percent, increase in advertising revenue generated from the Television Group’s Web sites as compared with the year ended December 31, 2006. Spot revenue increases in the home improvement, telecommunications, furniture and restaurant categories were partially offset by decreases in the automotive and department store categories. The increase in non-political advertising revenue was partially offset by a decrease in political advertising revenues. Political

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 19 

 

advertising revenues decreased $32,435, or 68.9 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2006. Other revenues increased primarily due to an increase in retransmission revenues.

 

Operating Costs and Expenses

 

Station salaries, wages and employee benefits decreased $9,106, or 3.8 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to an $8,529 decrease in bonus and commission expenses. Station programming and other operating costs decreased $3,155, or 1.4 percent, primarily due to a non-cash expense reduction of $6,379, relating to a 2005 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision that allowed a major wireless provider to finance the replacement of analog newsgathering equipment with digital equipment in exchange for stations vacating the analog spectrum earlier than required. Seven Belo markets converted to this digital equipment in 2008. Additionally, there was a $5,031 decrease in advertising and promotion and sales projects expenses and a $1,240 decrease in travel and entertainment expense. These credits and expense decreases were partially offset by a $5,173 increase in outside services and a $4,103 increase in programming costs.

 

Station salaries, wages and employee benefits increased $5,434, or 2.3 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to higher full-time salary, medical and workers compensation expenses partially offset by a decrease in pension expense resulting from the Company’s curtailment of its defined benefit pension plan effective March 31, 2007, and an increase in the discount rate applied to future pension obligations. Station programming and other operating costs increased $11,397, or 5.4 percent, primarily due to increases in consulting costs related to the technology outsourcing initiative announced in the second quarter 2006, and an increase in programming expense due to scheduled rate increases in syndicated programming.

 

Corporate operating costs decreased $9,241, or 22.8 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to a $6,197 decrease in share-based compensation, a $2,021 decrease in bonus expense and a $1,408 decrease in supplemental retirement expense related to plans that were suspended in December 2007.

 

Corporate operating costs decreased $8,231, or 20.3 percent, in the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to a $4,230 decrease in outside services that includes a decrease in consulting fees related to technology initiatives. Additionally, the Company recognized a $3,494 reduction in estimated pension expense primarily due to the Company’s curtailment of its defined benefit pension plan effective March 31, 2007

 

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred $4,659 and $9,267, respectively, in costs related to the spin-off of A. H. Belo. No spin-off costs were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

In the fourth quarter 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill of $350,540 and a non-cash impairment charge for intangible assets related to FCC licenses of $114,220. In the fourth quarter 2007, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for goodwill impairment of $22,137. See Critical Accounting Policies below for further discussion of the goodwill and intangible asset assessment process and impairment charges by reporting unit.

 

Interest expense decreased $11,401, or 12.1 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest expense decreased $1,160, or 1.2 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. During 2008, the Company repaid $350,000 of 8% Senior Notes due November 2008 with borrowings under the lower interest rate credit facility. Additionally, in 2008 the Company purchased $43,575 in Senior Notes at a discount. During 2007, the Company repaid $234,477 of 71/8% Senior Notes due June 2007 with available cash and borrowings under the lower interest rate credit facility.

 

Other income (expense), net, increased $13,580, or 216.7 percent, in 2008, primarily due to a $16,407 gain related to the Company’s fourth quarter 2008 purchase of a portion of its long-term notes. The notes were purchased on the open market at a discount. The 2008 gain is greater than the 2007 one-time gain of approximately $4,000 for Hurricane Katrina insurance proceeds received, resulting in the noted increase in 2008. Other income (expense), net, decreased $2,424 or 27.9 percent in 2007, compared to 2006 as the 2007 Hurricane Katrina insurance proceeds were less than the 2006 one-time gain of $7,536 in miscellaneous income related to a payment associated with a change-in-control provision in one of Belo’s vendor contracts.

 

Income taxes decreased $44,625, or 90.8 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared with the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to the tax benefit of $68,398 associated with the impairment charge for goodwill and FCC licenses. Even though the spin-off otherwise qualified for tax-free treatment to shareholders, the Company (but not its shareholders) recognized for tax purposes approximately $51,900 of previously deferred intercompany gains related to the transfer of certain intangibles to A. H. Belo, resulting in a federal income tax obligation of approximately $18,756 which

 

 

PAGE 20  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

partially offset the benefit previously noted. The Company’s effective tax rate was (1.4) percent for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

Income taxes decreased $1,181, or 2.3 percent, for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared with the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to lower taxable income and adjustments related to the implementation of the State of Texas margin tax. The Company’s effective tax rate was 44.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared with 34.5 percent for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in the Company’s effective tax rate in 2007 is principally due to increased state taxes related to the implementation of the Texas margin tax. In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation replacing its franchise tax with a new margin tax. Despite an effective date of January 1, 2008, the enactment of the Tax Reform Bill represents a change in tax law, and SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires that effects of the change be reflected in the financial statements in the quarter in which the new tax is enacted.

 

As a result of the matters discussed above, the Company recorded net loss from continuing operations of $(328,353), or $(3.21) per share, for 2008, compared with net earnings from continuing operations of $60,697, or $0.59 per share, for 2007, and net earnings from continuing operations of $95,379, or $0.92 per share, for 2006.

 

Discontinued Operations

 

The historical results of the Company’s former newspaper businesses and related assets are presented as discontinued operations due to the spin-off of these assets into a separate public company on February 8, 2008. All prior period amounts presented in the financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been adjusted to reflect this discontinued operations presentation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation and to reflect discontinued operations.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Statements in Items 7 and 7A and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K concerning Belo’s business outlook or future economic performance, anticipated profitability, revenues, expenses, dividends, capital expenditures, investments, future financings or other financial and non-financial items that are not historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” as the term is defined under applicable federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described throughout this filing, and particularly in Item 1A–Risk Factors, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those statements.

 

Such risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited to, uncertainties regarding the costs, consequences (including tax consequences) and other effects of the distribution of Belo’s newspaper businesses and related assets; changes in capital market conditions and prospects, and other factors such as changes in advertising demand, interest rates and programming and production costs; changes in viewership patterns and demography, and actions by Nielsen; changes in the network-affiliate business model for broadcast television; technological changes, including the transition to digital television and the development of new systems to distribute television and other audio-visual content; changes in the ability to secure, and in the terms of, carriage of Belo programming on cable, satellite, telecommunications and other program distribution methods; development of Internet commerce; industry cycles; changes in pricing or other actions by competitors and suppliers; Federal Communications Commission and other regulatory, tax and legal changes; adoption of new accounting standards or changes in existing accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting standard-setting bodies or authorities; the effects of Company acquisitions, dispositions and co-owned ventures; general economic conditions; and significant armed conflict, as well as other risks detailed in Belo’s other public disclosures, filings with the SEC and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Belo’s financial statements are based on the selection and application of accounting policies that require management to make significant estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that the following are some of the more critical accounting policies currently affecting Belo’s financial position and results of operations. See the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1–Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information concerning significant accounting policies.

 

Revenue Recognition     Broadcast advertising revenue is recorded, net of agency commissions, when commercials are aired. Advertising revenues for Internet Web sites are recorded, net of agency commissions, ratably over the period of time the advertisement is placed on Web sites.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 21 

 

Program Rights     Program rights represent the right to air various forms of first-run and existing second-run programming. Program rights and the corresponding contractual obligations are recorded when the license period begins and the programs are available for use. Program rights are carried at the lower of unamortized cost or estimated net realizable value on a program-by-program basis. Program rights and the corresponding contractual obligations are classified as current or long-term based on estimated usage and payment terms, respectively. Costs of off-network syndicated programs, first-run programming and feature films are amortized on a straight-line basis over the future number of showings allowed in the contract.

 

Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment, Goodwill and Intangible Assets     In assessing the recoverability of the Company’s property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges not previously recorded for these assets.

 

At December 31, 2008, Belo had net investments of $209,988 in property, plant and equipment. The Company reviews the carrying value of property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of property and equipment is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to the future net cash flows the property and equipment is expected to generate. Based on assessments performed during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, there were no indicators of impairment, therefore the Company did not record any impairment losses related to property, plant and equipment.

 

At December 31, 2008, Belo had investments in FCC licenses of $1,179,297. The Company classifies the FCC licenses apart from goodwill as separate indefinite-lived intangible assets. FCC licenses are tested for impairment at least annually on an individual market basis. For FCC licenses, if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Based on assessments performed for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to FCC licenses of $114,220. Of this amount, $51,740 related to the San Antonio, Texas market, $44,956 related to the Austin, Texas market, $16,473 related to the Louisville, Kentucky market, and $1,051 related to the Spokane, Washington market. There were no impairments of the FCC licenses in 2007 or 2006.

 

At December 31, 2008, Belo had investments in goodwill of $401,735. Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any.

 

The second step compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

 

The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination (i.e., the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all the assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit).

 

Goodwill is tested at least annually by reporting unit for impairment. A reporting unit consists of the television station(s) and cable news operations within a market. Fair value of the reporting units is determined using various valuation techniques, with the primary technique being discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires management to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. Assumptions about sales, operating margins and growth rates are based on the Company’s budgets, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data. Assumptions are also made for varying perpetual growth rates for periods beyond the Company’s long-term business plan period.

 

The fair value estimates for the reporting units assume normalized operating margin assumptions based on long-term expectations and margins historically realized by the individual reporting units and the broadcasting industry in general. In some cases, the assumed operating margins in certain future years are projected to be greater than the margins realized in 2008. The Company’s estimates contain uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively affect the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.

 

The Company has not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of goodwill and FCC licenses during the last three years. In 2008, as a result of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis, the fair

 

 

PAGE 22  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

value of 10 of 15 reporting units exceeded the carrying amount. For five of the reporting units, the carrying amount exceeded the fair value and the second step was performed. Based on second step assessments performed for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill of $350,540, of which $114,454 related to the Seattle, Washington market, $85,019 related to the Phoenix, Arizona market, $81,950 related to the Portland, Oregon market, $54,669 related to the St. Louis, Missouri market, and $14,449 related to the Spokane, Washington market. The impairment charges resulted primarily from a decline in the estimated fair value of the individual businesses, principally due to lower projected cash flows, particularly in the first few years of projection, versus prior year estimates. These lower projected cash flows reflect the current economic and advertising downturn. Based on assessments performed for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge related to goodwill of $22,137 related to the Louisville, Kentucky market. The non-cash goodwill impairment charge resulted from a decline in the estimated fair value of the market primarily due to lower estimated market growth rates versus previous year estimates. Based on the Company’s annual impairment test performed for the year ended December 31, 2006, there was no impairment of goodwill.

 

While the Company believes it has made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value of the reporting units, FCC licenses and implied fair value of goodwill, it is possible a material change could occur. If our actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used to calculate fair value, the Company may be required to perform an impairment analysis in advance of its annual impairment testing.

 

Contingencies     Belo is involved in certain claims and litigation related to its operations. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these claims and litigation would not have a material adverse effect on Belo’s consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual matter. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters.

 

Share-Based Compensation     The Company records compensation expense related to its stock options according to SFAS 123R, as adopted on January 1, 2006. The Company records compensation expense related to its options using the fair value as of the date of grant as calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton method. The Company records the compensation expense related to its restricted stock units using the fair value as of the date of grant.

 

Employee Benefits     Belo is in effect self-insured for employee-related health care benefits. A third-party administrator is used to process all claims. Belo’s employee health insurance liability is based on the Company’s historical claims experience and is developed from actuarial valuations. Belo’s reserves associated with the exposure to the self-insured liabilities are monitored by management for adequacy. However, actual amounts could vary significantly from such estimates.

 

Pension Benefits     Belo’s pension costs and obligations are calculated using various actuarial assumptions and methodologies as prescribed under SFAS 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” To assist in developing these assumptions and methodologies, Belo uses the services of an independent consulting firm. To determine the benefit obligations, the assumptions the Company uses include, but are not limited to, the selection of the discount rate. In determining the discount rate assumption of 6.88 percent, the Company used a measurement date of December 31, 2008 and constructed a portfolio of bonds to match the benefit payment stream that is projected to be paid from the Company’s pension plans. The benefit payment stream is assumed to be funded from bond coupons and maturities as well as interest on the excess cash flows from the bond portfolio.

 

To compute the Company’s pension expense in the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company used actuarial assumptions that include a discount rate and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The discount rate of 6.85 percent, used in this calculation, is the rate used in computing the benefit obligation as December 31, 2007. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.50 percent is based on the weighted average expected long-term returns for the target allocation of plan assets as of the measurement date, the end of the year, and was developed through analysis of historical market returns, current market conditions and the pension plan assets’ past experience. Although the Company believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences between assumed and actual experience may affect the Company’s operating results. See the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7–Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans, for additional information regarding the Company’s pension plan.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 141R, “Business Combinations.” SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 23 

 

The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, any business combinations Belo engaged in prior to January 1, 2009, were recorded and disclosed following existing accounting principles until January 1, 2009. The Company expects SFAS 141R will affect Belo’s consolidated financial statements but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions, if any, Belo consummates after January 1, 2009.

 

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements” for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities. On January 1, 2009 the Company adopted SFAS 157 for the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 establishes, among other items, a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a single definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and increases disclosures about estimates of fair value. The adoption of SFAS 157 has no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities.” This statement permits entities to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its eligible financial assets or liabilities, therefore the adoption of SFAS 159 had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Operating Cash Flows

 

Net cash provided by operations, bank borrowings and term debt are Belo’s primary sources of liquidity. Net cash provided by operations was $126,115, $218,802 and $245,928 in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The 2008 operating cash flows consisted of $144,436 provided by continuing operations and $18,321 used for discontinued operations. The 2007 operating cash flows consisted of $129,210 provided by continuing operations and $89,592 provided by discontinued operations. The 2006 operating cash flows consisted of $155,328 provided by continuing operations and $90,600 provided by discontinued operations. The operating cash flows were primarily used for routine changes in the Company’s working capital requirements.

 

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statements 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” requires the Company to recognize the funded status (i.e. the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations) of the Company’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Both the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations are measured annually on December 31. As of December 31, 2008, there is no pension funding requirement during the year ended December 31, 2009. However, changes in general market conditions may affect the funded status of the Company’s various plans when the obligations are assessed at the end of 2009. Please refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7–Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans for a full description of the Company’s postretirement benefit plans.

 

Investing Cash Flows

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities were $25,731, $75,921 and $109,372 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The 2008 investing cash flows consisted of $25,427 used in continuing operations investing activities and $304 used in discontinued operations investing activities. The 2007 investing cash flows consisted of $27,242 used in continuing operations investing activities and $48,679 used in discontinued operations investing activities. The 2006 investing cash flows consisted of $33,246 used in continuing operations investing activities and $76,126 used in discontinued operations investing activities. These cash flows are primarily attributable to capital expenditures as more fully described below.

 

 

PAGE 24  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Capital Expenditures

 

Total capital expenditures for continuing operations were $25,359, $27,393 and $34,535 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These were primarily for television station equipment and corporate-driven technology initiatives. As of December 31, 2008, projected capital expenditures for 2009 related to Belo’s television businesses and related assets are approximately $12,000. Belo expects to finance future capital expenditures using cash generated from operations and, when necessary, borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

 

Acquisition

 

On February 26, 2007, the Company purchased the assets of WUPL-TV, the My Network TV affiliate, in New Orleans, Louisiana.

 

Financing Cash Flows

 

Net cash flows used in financing activities were $113,594, $170,192 and $123,508 in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These net uses are primarily attributable to borrowings and repayments under the Company’s revolving credit facility, issuance of the Company’s 63/4% Senior Notes due 2013, dividends on common stock, proceeds from exercises of stock options and purchases of treasury stock as more fully described below.

 

Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2007:

 

 

The combined weighted average effective interest rate for these debt instruments was 5.1 percent and 7.3 percent as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The weighted average effective interest for the fixed rate debt was 7.2 percent and 7.5 percent as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

In 2008, the Company redeemed the 8% Senior Notes due November 1, 2008 with borrowings under the credit facility. Additionally in 2008, the Company purchased $33,575 of the outstanding 63/4% Senior Notes due May 30, 2013 and $10,000 of the outstanding 71/4% Senior Debentures due September 15, 2027 for a total cost of $26,788. These purchases were funded with borrowings under the credit facility. In 2007, the Company redeemed the 71/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2007. Subsequent to December 31, 2008, the Company purchased $14,000 of its outstanding 63/4% Senior Notes due May 30, 2013 for a total cost of $8,673.

 

On February 26, 2009, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated $550,000 Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders (the 2009 Credit Agreement). The 2009 Credit Agreement amended and restated the Company’s existing Amended and Restated $600,000 Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement (the 2008 Credit Agreement). The amendment reduced the total amount of the Credit Agreement and modified certain other terms and conditions. The facility may be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including letters of credit. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by the material subsidiaries of the Company. Revolving credit borrowings under the 2009 Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate, in either case plus an applicable margin that varies depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio. Competitive advance borrowings bear interest at a rate obtained from bids selected in accordance with JPMorgan Chase Bank’s standard competitive advance procedures. Commitment fees of up to 0.5 percent per year of the total unused commitment, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, accrue and are payable under the facility. The Company is required to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the agreement. Beginning February 26, 2009, through June 30, 2010, the maximum allowed leverage ratio is 6.25. The maximum allowed leverage ratio decreases by 50 basis points in the third quarter of 2010. Beginning December 31, 2010, and through the term of the agreement, the maximum allowed leverage ratio is 5.00.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 25 

 

From January 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010, the minimum required interest coverage ratio is 2.25. Beginning April 1, 2010, the minimum required interest coverage ratio increases to 2.50. The 2009 Credit Agreement contains additional covenants that are usual and customary for credit facilities of this type, including limits on dividends, bond repurchases, acquisitions and investments. The 2009 Credit Agreement does not permit share repurchases. Under the covenant related to dividends, the Company may declare its usual and customary dividend if its leverage ratio is then below 4.75. At a leverage ratio between 4.75 and 5.25, the Company may declare a dividend not to exceed 50 percent of the usual and customary amount. The Company may not declare a dividend if its leverage ratio exceeds 5.25.

 

On February 8, 2008, the date of the spin-off of A. H. Belo, the Company entered into the 2008 Credit Agreement. The 2008 Credit Agreement amended and restated the Company’s then existing Amended and Restated $1,000,000 Five-Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement (the 2006 Credit Agreement). The amendment reduced the total amount of the Credit Agreement and modified certain other terms and conditions. Revolving credit borrowings under the 2008 Credit Agreement bore interest at a variable interest rate based on either LIBOR or a base rate, in either case plus an applicable margin that varied depending upon the rating of the Company’s senior unsecured long-term, non-credit enhanced debt. Competitive advance borrowings bore interest at a rate obtained from bids selected in accordance with JPMorgan Chase Bank’s standard competitive advance procedures. Commitment fees which depend on the Company’s credit rating, of up to 0.375 percent per year of the total unused commitment, accrued and were payable under the facility. The 2008 Credit Agreement contained usual and customary covenants for credit facilities of this type, including covenants limiting liens, mergers and substantial asset sales. The Company was required to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the agreement. At December 31, 2008, the maximum allowed leverage ratio was 5.75 and the minimum required interest coverage ratio was 2.25, as specified in the agreement. At December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenant requirements. The credit facility borrowings were convertible at the Company’s option to revolving debt. Accordingly, such borrowings were classified as long-term in the Company’s financial statements. As of December 31, 2008, the balance outstanding under the 2008 Credit Agreement was $437,000 and the weighted average interest rate was 1.9 percent and all unused borrowings were available for borrowing. This 2008 Credit Agreement was amended and restated in 2009, as discussed above.

 

On June 7, 2006, the Company entered into the 2006 Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders. The 2006 Credit Agreement amended and restated the Company’s then existing $1,000,000 Five-Year Credit Agreement (the 2005 Credit Agreement) by, among other things, extending the term of the existing facility to June 2011. The Company was required to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios specified in the agreement. As of December 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenant requirements. As of December 31, 2007, the balance outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreement was $118,000. At December 31, 2007, all unused borrowings were available for borrowing. This 2006 Credit Agreement was amended and restated in 2008, as discussed above.

 

Prior to the 2008 Credit Agreement mentioned above, the Company had uncommitted lines of credit of $10,000. At December 31, 2007, there was $1,050 outstanding under the $10,000 line of credit. These borrowings were convertible at the Company’s option to revolving debt. Accordingly, such borrowings were classified as long-term in the Company’s financial statements. As of December 31, 2007, the weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the line of credit and the 2006 Credit Agreement was 6.1 percent.

 

In May 2006, Belo issued $250,000 of 63/4% Senior Notes due May 30, 2013 at a premium of approximately $1,118. Interest on these 63/4% Senior Notes is due semi-annually on November 30 and May 30 of each year. The Company may redeem the 63/4% Senior Notes at its option at any time in whole or from time to time in part at a redemption price calculated in accordance with the indenture under which the notes were issued. The net proceeds were used to repay debt previously outstanding under Belo’s revolving credit facility, with the remaining proceeds invested in cash and temporary cash investments for working capital needs at December 31, 2007. The $1,118 discount associated with the issuance of these 63/4% Senior Notes is being amortized over the term of the 63/4% Senior Notes using the effective interest rate method. As of December 31, 2008, the unamortized premium was $660.

 

Dividends

 

The following table presents dividend information for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:

 

 

 

PAGE 26  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Exercise of Stock Options

 

There were no stock options exercised in the year ended December 31, 2008. The following table presents stock option information for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:

 

 

Share Repurchase Program

 

On December 9, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had 13,030,716 remaining shares under this repurchase authority. There is not an expiration date for this repurchase program. Additionally, through 2008 Belo had in place a stock repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $2,500 of Company stock annually. During 2008, no shares were purchased under this program. In December 2008, the Company terminated this program. The total cost of the treasury shares purchased in 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $2,203, $17,152 and $144,429, respectively. All shares repurchased were retired in the year of purchase.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The table below summarizes the following specified commitments of the Company as of December 31, 2008. See the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13–Commitments, for more information on contractual obligations:

 

 

 

Spin-off of A. H. Belo

 

On February 8, 2008, the Company completed the spin-off of its former newspaper businesses and related assets into a separate public company, A. H. Belo Corporation (A. H. Belo), which has its own management and board of directors. The spin-off was accomplished by transferring the subject assets and liabilities to A. H. Belo and distributing a pro-rata, tax-free dividend to the Company’s shareholders of 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series A common stock for every share of Belo Series A common stock, and 0.20 shares of A. H. Belo Series B common stock for every share of Belo Series B common stock, owned as of the close of business on January 25, 2008.

 

Except as noted below, the Company has no further ownership interest in A. H. Belo or in any newspaper businesses or related assets, and A. H. Belo has no ownership interest in the Company or any television station businesses or related assets. Belo did not recognize any revenues or costs generated by A. H. Belo that would have been included in its financial results were it not for the spin-off. Belo’s relationship with A. H. Belo is governed primarily by a separation and distribution agreement, a services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, and certain other agreements between the two companies or their respective subsidiaries as further discussed below. Belo and A. H. Belo also co-own certain downtown Dallas, Texas real estate and other investment assets and have some overlap in board members and shareholders. Although the services related to these agreements generate continuing cash flows between Belo and A. H. Belo, the amounts are not considered to be significant to the ongoing operations of either company. In addition, the agreements and other relationships do not provide Belo with the ability to significantly influence the operating or financial policies of A. H. Belo and, therefore, do not constitute significant continuing involvement.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 27 

 

The historical operations of the newspaper businesses and related assets are included in discontinued operations in the Company’s financial statements.

 

In the separation and distribution agreement between Belo and A. H. Belo, effective as of the spin-off date, A. H. Belo and Belo indemnify each other and certain related parties, from all liabilities existing or arising from acts and events occurring, or failing to occur (or alleged to have occurred or to have failed to occur) regarding each other’s businesses, whether occurring before, at or after the effective time of the spin-off; provided, however, that under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement, the Company and A. H. Belo share equally in any liabilities, net of any applicable insurance, resulting from the circulation-related lawsuits described in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 14–Contingent Liabilities.

 

Under the services agreement, the Company and A. H. Belo (or their respective subsidiaries) provide each other various services and/or support for a period of up to two years after the spin-off date. Payments made or other consideration provided in connection with all continuing transactions between the Company and A. H. Belo will be on an arms-length basis or on a basis consistent with the business purpose of the parties.

 

The tax matters agreement sets out each party’s rights and obligations with respect to deficiencies and refunds, if any, of federal, state, local, or foreign taxes for periods before and after the spin-off and related matters such as the filing of tax returns and the conduct of IRS and other audits. Under this agreement, the Company will be responsible for all income taxes prior to the spin-off, except that A. H. Belo will be responsible for its share of income taxes paid on a consolidated basis for the period of January 1, 2008 through February 8, 2008. A. H. Belo will also be responsible for its income taxes incurred after the spin-off. In addition, even though the spin-off otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment to shareholders, the Company (but not its shareholders) recognized for tax purposes approximately $51,900 of previously deferred intercompany gains in connection with the spin-off, resulting in a federal income tax obligation of $17,954, and a state tax of $802. If such gains are adjusted in the future, then the Company and A. H. Belo shall be responsible for paying the additional tax associated with any increase in such gains in the ratio of one-third and two-thirds, respectively. With respect to all other taxes, the Company will be responsible for taxes attributable to the television businesses and related assets, and A. H. Belo will be responsible for taxes attributable to the newspaper businesses and related assets. In addition, the Company will indemnify A. H. Belo and A. H. Belo will indemnify the Company, for all taxes and liabilities incurred as a result of post-spin-off actions or omissions by the indemnifying party that affect the tax consequences of the spin-off, subject to certain exceptions.

 

The employee matters agreement allocates liabilities and responsibilities relating to employee compensation and benefits plans and programs and other related matters in connection with the spin-off, including, without limitation, the treatment of outstanding Belo equity awards, certain outstanding annual and long-term incentive awards, existing deferred compensation obligations, and certain retirement and welfare benefit obligations.

 

The Company’s Dallas/Fort Worth television station, WFAA and The Dallas Morning News, owned by A. H. Belo, provide media content, cross-promotion, and other services to the other on a mutually agreed upon basis. That sharing is expected to continue for the foreseeable future under the agreements discussed above. Prior to the spin-off, The Dallas Morning News and WFAA shared media content at no cost. In addition, the Company and A. H. Belo co-own certain downtown Dallas, Texas real estate through a limited liability company formed in connection with the spin-off and several investments in third-party businesses.

 

Other

 

The Company has various options available to meet its 2009 capital and operating commitments, including cash on hand, short term investments, internally generated funds and a $550,000 revolving credit facility. The Company believes its current financial condition and credit relationships are adequate to fund both its current obligations as well as near-term growth.

 

Other Matters

 

Under the terms of the separation and distribution agreement between the Company and A. H. Belo, they will share equally in any liabilities, net of any applicable insurance, resulting from the circulation-related lawsuits described in the next two paragraphs below.

 

On August 23, 2004, August 26, 2004, and October 5, 2004, respectively, three related lawsuits, now consolidated, were filed by purported shareholders of the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Company, Robert W. Decherd and Barry T. Peckham, a former executive officer of The Dallas Morning News. James M. Moroney III, an executive officer of The Dallas Morning News, was later added as a defendant. The complaints arise out of the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News announced by the Company in 2004, alleging that the overstatement artificially inflated Belo’s financial results and thereby injured investors. No amount of damages has been specified. The

 

 

PAGE 28  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

plaintiffs seek to represent a purported class of shareholders who purchased Belo common stock between May 12, 2003 and August 6, 2004 and allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On April 2, 2008, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On April 16, 2008, plaintiffs filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit seeking permission to appeal that denial. On June 17, 2008, permission was granted, and plaintiffs are appealing the denial of class certification. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 2, 2009. The Company believes the complaints are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.

 

On June 3, 2005, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed by a purported individual shareholder of the Company in the 191^st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Robert W. Decherd, John L. Sander, Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson, and James M. Moroney III; Barry T. Peckham; and Louis E. Caldera, Judith L. Craven, Stephen Hamblett, Dealey D. Herndon, Wayne R. Sanders, France A. Córdova, Laurence E. Hirsch, J. McDonald Williams, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Roger A. Enrico, William T. Solomon, Lloyd D. Ward, M. Anne Szostak and Arturo Madrid, current and former directors of the Company. The lawsuit makes various claims asserting mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty related to the circulation overstatement at The Dallas Morning News. On May 30, 2007, after a prior discovery stay ended, the court issued an order administratively closing the case. Under the court’s order, the case is stayed and, as a result, no further action can be taken unless the case is reinstated. The court retained jurisdiction and the case is subject to being reinstated by the court or upon motion by any party. The court order was not a dismissal with prejudice.

 

Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, A. H. Belo has agreed to indemnify the Company for any liability arising out of the following lawsuit.

 

On October 24, 2006, 18 former employees of The Dallas Morning News filed a lawsuit against the The Dallas Morning News, the Company, and others in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The plaintiffs’ lawsuit alleges unlawful discrimination and ERISA violations and includes allegations relating to The Dallas Morning News circulation overstatement (similar to the circulation-related lawsuits described above). In June 2007, the court issued a memorandum order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motion to dismiss. In August 2007, the court dismissed certain additional claims. A trial date, originally set in January 2009, has been reset to April 2010. The Company believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.

 

In addition to the proceedings disclosed above, a number of other legal proceedings are pending against the Company, including several actions for alleged libel and/or defamation. In the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from these other legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

 

The market risk inherent in the financial instruments issued by Belo represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. See the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9–Long-Term Debt, for information concerning the contractual interest rates of Belo’s debt. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of Belo’s fixed-rate debt was estimated to be $378,001 and $1,012,175, respectively, using quoted market prices and yields obtained through independent pricing sources, taking into consideration the underlying terms of the debt, such as the coupon rate and term to maturity. The decrease in fair value is related to current market conditions on the associated change in the Company’s credit rating. The carrying value of fixed-rate debt was $655,765 and $1,049,090 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Various financial instruments issued by Belo are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Interest rate changes would result in gains or losses in the market value of Belo’s fixed-rate debt due to differences between the current market interest rates and the rates governing these instruments. A hypothetical 10 percent decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate debt by $37,289 at December 31, 2008 ($29,512 at December 31, 2007). With respect to the Company’s variable-rate debt, a 10 percent change in interest rates for the year ended December 31, 2008 or 2007, would have resulted in an immaterial annual change to Belo’s pretax earnings and cash flows.

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial statement schedules have been omitted because the required information is contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements or related Notes, or because such information is not applicable.

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 29 

 

 

None.

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Belo’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in the Company’s SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

SEC rules implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K to contain management’s report regarding the effectiveness of internal control and an independent accountants’ attestation on management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. As a basis for our report, we tested and evaluated the design, documentation, and operating effectiveness of internal control.

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting of Belo Corp. and its subsidiaries (the Company). There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

 

Management has evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the standards promulgated by the PCAOB and in the Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that Belo maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.

 

Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. It appears immediately following this report.

 

 

PAGE 30  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Belo Corp.

 

We have audited Belo Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Belo Corp.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Belo Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Belo Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Dallas, Texas

February 27, 2009

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 31 

 

 

None.

 

 

The information set forth under the headings “Belo Corp. Stock Ownership — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Proposal One: Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance–Audit Committee,” “Corporate Governance–Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,” and “Executive Officers” contained in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 12, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Belo has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees, which can be found at the Company’s Web site, www.belo.com. The Company will post any amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the New York Stock Exchange, on the Company’s Web site. Information on Belo’s Web site is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees of the Board of Directors. These documents can be found at the Company’s Web site, www.belo.com.

 

A shareholder can also obtain, without charge, a printed copy of any of the materials referred to above by contacting the Company at the following address:

 

Belo Corp.
P.O. Box 655237
Dallas, Texas 75265-5237
Attn: Corporate Secretary
Telephone: (214) 977-6606

 

The information set forth under the headings “Executive Compensation–Compensation Discussion and Analysis,–Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,–Compensation Committee Report,–Summary Compensation Table,–Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2008,–Belo Corp. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2008,–A.H. Belo Corporation Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2008,–Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2008,–Post-Employment Benefits,–Pension Benefits at December 31, 2008,–Non-qualified Deferred Compensation,–Non-qualified Deferred Compensation for 2008,–Termination of Employment and Change In Control Arrangements,–Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control at December 31, 2008–Director Compensation” and “Corporate Governance–Compensation Committee” contained in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 12, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information set forth under the heading “Belo Corp. Stock Ownership” contained in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 12, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information regarding the number of shares of common stock available under the Company’s equity compensation plans is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5–Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

The information set forth under the heading “Director Compensation–Certain Relationships” and “Corporate Governance–Director Independence” contained in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 12, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information set forth under the heading “Proposal Two: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” contained in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 12, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

PAGE 32  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

 

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 33 

 

 

 

PAGE 34  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 35 

 

 

 

PAGE 36  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

BELO CORP.

 

Dunia A. Shive

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

Dated: March 2, 2009

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

The undersigned hereby constitute and appoint Dunia A. Shive, Dennis A. Williamson and Guy H. Kerr, and each of them and their substitutes, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power to execute in our name and behalf in the capacities indicated below any and all amendments to this report and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby ratify and confirm all that such attorneys-in-fact, or any of them, or their substitutes shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 37 

 

 

 

PAGE 38  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K

 

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Belo Corp.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Belo Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Belo Corp. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Belo Corp. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Dallas, Texas

February 27, 2009

 

 

Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K PAGE 39 

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

PAGE 40  Belo Corp. 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K