AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 20, 2006.
Subject to Amendment.
Registration
No. 333-133557
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
PRE-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(Exact name of each registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Bermuda |
|
6411 |
|
Not applicable |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
44 Church Street
P.O. Box HM2064
Hamilton HM HX, Bermuda
(441) 296-8560
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including
Area Code of Each Registrants Principal Executive
Offices)
Steven B. Mathis
American Safety Holdings Corp.
1845 The Exchange
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 916-1908
FAX: (678) 718-2694
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Codes of Agent For Service)
With Copies to:
|
|
|
W. Brinkley Dickerson, Jr.
Troutman Sanders LLP
600 Peachtree Street, Suite 5200
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
(404) 885-3000
FAX: (404) 962-6743 |
|
Nancy H. Corbett
Sidley Austin llp
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, New York 10019
(212) 839-5300
FAX: (212) 839-5599 |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange
Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
Information
contained in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed.
We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities, and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities, in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to Completion, dated
June 20, 2006
PROSPECTUS
3,200,000 Shares
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
Common Shares
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. is offering
3,200,000 Common Shares, $.01 par value.
The Common Shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol ASI. On June 19, 2006, the
last reported sale price of the Common Shares was
$16.24 per share.
You should carefully review the Risk Factors
section beginning on page 10 in connection with this
offering and an investment in the Common Shares.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to | |
|
|
|
|
Underwriting Discounts | |
|
American Safety | |
|
|
Price to Public | |
|
and Commissions(1) | |
|
Insurance(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Per Share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total(3)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
American Safety Insurance has agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See
Underwriting. |
|
|
(2) |
Before deducting expenses of this offering payable by us
estimated at $600,000. |
|
|
(3) |
This is a firm commitment underwriting. The Company has granted
the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional
480,000 Common Shares to cover over-allotments. The
underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or
about .
For further discussion, see Underwriting. |
|
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods
a
division of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information from this prospectus that
we believe is the most important regarding this offering. It may
not contain all of the information that is important to you. You
should read the entire prospectus carefully before investing in
the Common Shares.
The terms we, our, us,
Company and American Safety Insurance
refer to American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and, unless
the context requires otherwise, include our subsidiaries.
Who We Are
We are a specialty insurance company that provides customized
insurance products and solutions to small and medium-sized
businesses in industries that we believe are underserved by the
standard insurance market. For twenty years, we have developed
specialized insurance coverages and alternative risk transfer
products not generally available to our customers in the
standard insurance market because of the unique characteristics
of the risks involved and the associated needs of the insureds.
We specialize in underwriting these products for insureds with
environmental risks and construction risks as well as in
developing programs for other specialty classes of risks.
We were formed in 1986 as an insurance company in Bermuda and
began our operations providing insurance solutions to
environmental remediation businesses in the U.S. at a time
when insurance coverage for these risks was virtually
unavailable. Since then, we have continued to identify
opportunities in other industry sectors underserved by standard
insurance carriers where we believe we can achieve strong and
consistent returns on equity. We capitalize on these
opportunities by (i) leveraging our strong relationships
with agents and brokers, which we refer to as producers, among
whom we believe we have a recognized commitment to the specialty
insurance market, (ii) charging a higher premium for the
risks we underwrite and the services we offer due to the limited
availability of insurance coverages for these risks and
(iii) mitigating our loss exposure through customized
policy terms, specialized underwriting and proactive loss
control and claims management.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, our net earnings from
insurance operations were $13.6 million, a 219.5% increase
over 2004. For the same period, our net earnings were
$14.7 million, or $2.05 per diluted share, compared to
$14.8 million, or $2.01 per diluted share, for 2004.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, our gross premiums
written were $237.9 million, a 7.4% increase over 2004. At
December 31, 2005, we had total assets of
$697.1 million and shareholders equity of
$118.4 million, or $17.54 per share.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, our net earnings
were $4.1 million, or $0.57 per diluted share,
compared to $3.6 million, or $0.50 per diluted share,
for the same period of 2005. For the three months ended
March 31, 2006, our gross premiums written were
$53.2 million, a 17.2% decrease over the same period of
2005. At March 31, 2006, we had total assets of
$709.6 million and shareholders equity of
$119.7 million, or $17.66 per share.
Our Products
Our core product segments include excess and surplus lines
(E&S) and alternative risk transfer
(ART).
Excess and Surplus Lines. Excess and surplus lines
insurers provide coverage for difficult to place risks that do
not fit the underwriting criteria of insurance companies
operating in the standard insurance market. We focus our excess
and surplus lines segment on small to medium-sized businesses in
industries such as environmental and construction because we
believe that, due to the complex risk profile of those
businesses and their smaller account sizes, there is less
competition to underwrite these risks. We provide the following
excess and surplus lines products:
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental. We underwrite various types of
environmental risks, including contractors pollution
liability, environmental consultants professional
liability and environmental impairment liability. We do not
provide coverage for manufacturers or installers of products
containing asbestos |
|
|
|
|
|
that have been the subject of class action lawsuits, but instead
insure the contractors who remediate asbestos. |
|
|
|
Construction. We underwrite various types of residential
and commercial construction risks. Our construction insurance
coverages consist mostly of primary general and excess general
liability coverages for insureds primarily located in the
western U.S. Also included in our construction business
line are other insurance coverages for underserved markets,
including general liability for building owners and equipment
dealers and products liability for product manufacturers and
distributors. |
|
|
|
Surety. We are listed as an acceptable surety on federal
bonds, commonly known as a Treasury-listed or
T listed surety, primarily providing contract
performance and payment bonds to environmental contractors and
general construction contractors in 47 states and the
District of Columbia. |
Alternative Risk Transfer. In the alternative risk
transfer market, companies provide insurance and risk management
products for insureds who want more control over the claims
administration process and who pay very high insurance premiums
or are unable to find adequate insurance coverage. We provide
the following alternative risk transfer products:
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs. Working with third party program
managers, reinsurance intermediaries and reinsurers, we target
small and medium-sized businesses with homogenous groups of
specialty risks where the principal insurance requirements are
general, professional or pollution liability. We outsource the
underwriting and administration duties for these programs to
program managers with established underwriting expertise in the
specialty program area. Our specialty programs consist primarily
of casualty insurance coverages for construction contractors,
pest control operators, small auto dealers, real estate brokers,
apartment owners, restaurant owners, tavern owners, bail
bondsmen and Hawaii taxicab operators. |
|
|
|
Fully-Funded. Fully-funded policies allow us to meet the
needs of insureds that, due to the nature of their businesses,
pay very high insurance premiums or are unable to find adequate
insurance coverage. Typically, our insureds are required to
maintain insurance coverage to operate their businesses and the
fully-funded product allows these insureds to provide evidence
of insurance, yet at the same time maintain more control over
insurance costs and handling of claims. We do not assume
underwriting risk on these polices, but instead earn fees for
providing the policies, which are recorded as premiums. We write
fully-funded general and professional liability policies for
businesses operating primarily in the healthcare and
construction industries. |
2
The following table sets forth our gross premiums written (in
thousands) by business line and the allocation of those premiums
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total | |
|
|
Gross Premiums Written | |
|
Gross Premiums Written | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
34,603 |
|
|
$ |
44,157 |
|
|
$ |
51,014 |
|
|
$ |
13,594 |
|
|
$ |
12,641 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
Construction
|
|
|
85,793 |
|
|
|
96,905 |
|
|
|
95,406 |
|
|
|
27,053 |
|
|
|
23,064 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
121,133 |
|
|
|
142,787 |
|
|
|
149,001 |
|
|
|
41,144 |
|
|
|
36,575 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
73,152 |
|
|
|
76,264 |
|
|
|
85,138 |
|
|
|
22,743 |
|
|
|
16,345 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
Fully-Funded
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
73,690 |
|
|
|
77,545 |
|
|
|
88,960 |
|
|
|
23,060 |
|
|
|
16,608 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) (1) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
212,667 |
|
|
$ |
221,575 |
|
|
$ |
237,880 |
|
|
$ |
64,211 |
|
|
$ |
53,183 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents premiums returned to insureds by us. |
The following table sets forth our net premiums written (in
thousands) by business line and the allocation of those premiums
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total | |
|
|
Net Premiums Written | |
|
Net Premiums Written | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
27,233 |
|
|
$ |
35,024 |
|
|
$ |
41,477 |
|
|
$ |
10,967 |
|
|
$ |
8,071 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
Construction
|
|
|
73,572 |
|
|
|
77,894 |
|
|
|
78,026 |
|
|
|
22,185 |
|
|
|
20,353 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
101,539 |
|
|
|
114,092 |
|
|
|
120,848 |
|
|
|
33,402 |
|
|
|
28,864 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
Fully-Funded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
17,530 |
|
|
|
21,749 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) (1) |
|
|
(35 |
) (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
131,478 |
|
|
$ |
131,921 |
|
|
$ |
140,552 |
|
|
$ |
36,770 |
|
|
$ |
33,578 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents premiums returned to insureds by us. |
3
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that certain aspects of our business model support
our competitive position in the specialty insurance market,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on underserved insurance markets. We focus on
providing insurance products and solutions to niche, underserved
markets which exhibit less competition than the standard
insurance market and where we have specialized expertise. The
coverages we provide are typically nondiscretionary for the
insurance buyer, where the purchase of the insurance coverage is
required for the continued operation of the insureds
business. We believe that we have developed an effective
approach to identifying voids in the insurance market where we
have more flexibility over the premiums we can charge and the
terms and conditions we can offer for our policies. |
|
|
|
Versatile organizational structure. Unlike many of our
specialty market competitors, our structure includes both
Bermuda-domiciled reinsurance and captive companies and
U.S.-domiciled admitted
and non-admitted insurance companies and a non-affiliated risk
retention group. This structure gives us the flexibility to
utilize our
U.S.-domiciled
insurance companies to write admitted and non-admitted policies,
our Bermuda reinsurance companies to act as a reinsurer of those
policies, our Bermuda captive to serve as a risk sharing vehicle
for program managers and insureds and our risk retention group
to write policies without having to qualify to do so in each
state. Our organizational structure allows us to effectively
respond to market trends and to meet the needs of our producers
and insureds. |
|
|
|
Commitment to underwriting discipline. Our assessment of
our ability to produce an underwriting profit is a driving
factor in deciding whether or not to expand our business or,
conversely, to contract our capacity in the markets we serve.
Our loss ratio, as compared to the property and casualty
industry average, is a testament to our underwriting discipline.
According to Bests Aggregates and Averages for Property
and Casualty Insurers published by A.M. Best Company
(A.M. Best), from 1998 through 2004 the average
net loss ratio for the property and casualty industry was 79.2%,
while our average net loss ratio over the same time period was
58.2%. |
|
|
|
Proactive claims management and loss control practices.
We emphasize a fair but firm claims handling philosophy. Our
adjusters promptly and thoroughly investigate claims and
strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of our policies. We
also employ loss control practices designed to monitor and
improve our insureds safety and quality control
procedures. Claims management and loss control play an important
part in our underwriting process by enhancing our
underwriters awareness of emerging issues. |
|
|
|
Valuable distribution relationships. We utilize the
services of producers to attract new business and to retain
existing clients. During our twenty-year history, we have
developed strong relationships with producers who we believe
consider us to be a preferred source for insurance solutions for
unique or difficult to place risks. We currently market our
products through over 230 producers in all 50 states and
the District of Columbia. |
|
|
|
Strong financial strength rating. We are rated
A (Excellent), with a negative outlook,
and have been assigned a financial size category of VIII by A.M.
Best. We believe our rating from A.M. Best is important to our
producers and insureds because it instills confidence in our
capital strength and ability to pay claims. A.M. Best assigned a
negative outlook to the rating in September 2004 in
response to our reserve strengthening in the second quarter of
2004 because of a concern by A.M. Best with the underwriting
results from our core business lines and the potential for
further reserve strengthening in the future. A.M. Best
reaffirmed this rating and outlook in November 2005. A.M.
Bests rating and outlook should not be considered as an
investment recommendation. For additional information on our
A.M. Best rating, see Risk Factors and
Business Rating. |
4
Our Strategy
We intend to support the managed growth of our business and
enhance shareholder value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase our retention of the business we currently
write. In the past, we have relied heavily on reinsurance
due to capital and rating agency considerations. In July 2005,
however, we ceased purchasing reinsurance on the primary general
liability portion of our construction business line. We made
this decision after performing a loss cost and dynamic financial
analysis and concluding that our reinsurance purchases were
uneconomical. We believe retaining this exposure will enhance
our financial results and returns on capital. We also plan to
reduce our dependence on reinsurance and increase our retention
of the business that we write in other areas such as specialty
programs, environmental and surety. |
|
|
|
Grow opportunistically our core business lines. We plan
to grow opportunistically our business in markets where we have
specialized expertise to control risk and maximize underwriting
profits, both by expanding premium writings in existing products
and by expanding in geographic areas where we have less market
presence. |
|
|
|
|
|
In our environmental business line, approximately 4.0% of our
gross premiums written were generated from our environmental
impairment liability product for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. We plan to expand writings in this product
and have recently added underwriting expertise necessary to
support this growth. We also intend to contribute to the
expansion of the environmental business line by increasing our
web-based distribution capabilities. |
|
|
|
In our construction business line, 93.0% of our gross premiums
written were generated from policies written in the western
U.S., primarily California, for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. We plan to expand geographically in
response to decreasing availability of general liability
insurance for residential contractors in other areas of the U.S. |
|
|
|
In our alternative risk transfer segment, we plan to expand
writings of our fully-funded product by increasing our
distribution sources. A significant portion of our fully-funded
fees are generated through five producers. We also plan to
expand our specialty program business line by adding new
programs as well as increasing our capacity in existing
programs. For example, in January 2006 we implemented a new
program providing general liability coverage for owners of
senior habitational facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Grow into new product lines. In the past, we have
identified profitable opportunities in underserved sectors of
the insurance industry to expand our business lines and
products. We plan opportunistically to develop new insurance
products outside our core business lines for customers in
underserved markets. As an example, in 2004 we introduced our
fully-funded business line, which reflected our ability to
expand our product offerings to meet the specific insurance
needs of our customers. |
|
|
|
Pursue potential acquisitions on a selective basis. We
continually pursue opportunities to acquire managing general
agents, program managers, specialty books of business and
experienced underwriting teams with a demonstrated history of
profitable underwriting in specialty business lines. The
acquisition of managing general agents and program managers
would present an opportunity to grow our specialty program
business, and the acquisition of specialty books of business and
experienced underwriting teams would provide an opportunity to
expand our product offerings. Historically, acquisitions have
not played a large role in our business, but we expect them to
be an important part of our strategy in the future. |
|
|
|
Leverage our investments in information technology and
enhance operational efficiencies. We have worked extensively
to increase the efficiency and decrease the cost of processing
the business we produce. We believe our technology is scalable
and can be modified at minimal cost to accommodate our growth.
We expect that our investments in information technology and
improved operational efficiency will contribute to a lower
expense ratio as we achieve premium growth over |
5
|
|
|
|
|
time. For more information on the investments we have made in
information technology, see Business
Technology. |
|
|
|
Actively manage our capital. The level of capital that we
maintain, and how we deploy that capital, is an important factor
in maintaining our A (Excellent) financial strength
rating from A.M. Best. In evaluating our strategic initiatives,
we actively consider the associated impact that these
initiatives may have on our capital requirements. We believe our
rating from A.M. Best is a competitive advantage to us and
maintaining it will be a principal consideration in our
decisions regarding growth and capital management. |
Our Challenges
As part of the evaluation of our business, you should consider
the challenges we face in implementing our business strategy,
including but not limited to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A downgrade in our A.M. Best rating or increased capital
requirements could impair our ability to sell insurance
policies. |
|
|
|
The risks we underwrite are concentrated in relatively few
industries. |
|
|
|
Our actual incurred losses may be greater than our reserves
for losses and loss adjustment expenses. |
|
|
|
We may be unable to recover amounts due from our
reinsurers. |
|
|
|
We are subject to risks related to litigation. |
|
|
|
Policy pricing in our industry is cyclical, and our financial
results are impacted by that cyclicality. |
|
|
|
Our industry is subject to significant and increasing
regulatory scrutiny. |
For further discussion of these and other risks we face, see
Risk Factors.
Our Offices
Our office is located at 44 Church Street, Hamilton, Bermuda,
and the telephone number is (441) 296-8560. The corporate
offices of our U.S. subsidiaries are located at 1845 The
Exchange, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, and the telephone number is
(770) 916-1908.
6
The Offering
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock offered by us |
|
3,200,000 shares(1) |
|
|
Price |
|
$ per
share |
|
|
Shares of Common Stock to be issued and outstanding after the
offering |
|
10,030,165 shares(1)(2) |
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
See Use of Proceeds. |
|
NYSE market symbol |
|
ASI |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors. |
|
|
|
(1) |
This number does not include the 480,000 Common Shares the
underwriters have the option to purchase to cover
over-allotments. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Excludes 858,999 Common Shares that are subject to stock options. |
|
7
Summary Financial Data
The following consolidated financial data presented below, as
of or for each of the years ended December 31, 2003,
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005, are derived
from our audited consolidated financial statements. The
following consolidated data presented below, as and for each of
the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, are
derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements.
This data is qualified in its entirety by reference to and,
therefore, should be read together with, the detailed
information and financial statements appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data and ratios) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$ |
212,667 |
|
|
$ |
221,576 |
|
|
$ |
237,880 |
|
|
$ |
64,211 |
|
|
$ |
53,183 |
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
131,478 |
|
|
|
131,921 |
|
|
|
140,552 |
|
|
|
36,770 |
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
109,334 Net premiums earned
|
|
|
136,391 |
|
|
|
138,536 |
|
|
|
34,621 |
|
|
|
35,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
9,773 |
|
|
|
14,316 |
|
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
4,544 |
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
|
57,555 |
|
|
|
67,967 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
175,991 |
|
|
|
214,656 |
|
|
|
155,874 |
|
|
|
40,140 |
|
|
|
40,028 |
|
|
65,834 Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
93,503 |
|
|
|
84,406 |
|
|
|
20,781 |
|
|
|
22,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
21,818 |
|
|
|
26,529 |
|
|
|
28,512 |
|
|
|
7,126 |
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
Real estate expenses
|
|
|
53,999 |
|
|
|
55,480 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
10,090 Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
|
14,757 |
|
|
|
14,656 |
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents used in computing net
basic earnings per share
|
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
6,737 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents used in computing net
diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments, excluding real estate
|
|
$ |
222,418 |
|
|
$ |
327,037 |
|
|
$ |
415,497 |
|
|
$ |
339,951 |
|
|
$ |
421,544 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
514,260 |
|
|
|
584,160 |
|
|
|
697,135 |
|
|
|
609,382 |
|
|
|
709,575 |
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
230,104 |
|
|
|
321,624 |
|
|
|
394,873 |
|
|
|
336,843 |
|
|
|
403,197 |
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
99,939 |
|
|
|
93,798 |
|
|
|
100,241 |
|
|
|
102,757 |
|
|
|
96,828 |
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
30,441 |
|
|
|
13,019 |
|
|
|
37,810 |
|
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
418,916 |
|
|
|
475,380 |
|
|
|
578,700 |
|
|
|
500,321 |
|
|
|
589,867 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
95,344 |
|
|
|
108,780 |
|
|
|
118,435 |
|
|
|
109,061 |
|
|
|
119,707 |
|
GAAP Underwriting Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
ratio(1)
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
68.6 |
% |
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
Expense
ratio(2)
|
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
ratio(3)
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
102.7 |
% |
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average shareholders
equity(4)
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
Debt to total
capitalization(5)
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
Net premiums written to equity
|
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
1.2 |
x |
|
|
1.2 |
x |
|
|
1.3 |
x |
|
|
1.1 |
x |
8
|
|
(1) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio: The losses and
loss adjustment expenses ratio is the ratio, expressed as a
percentage, of losses and loss adjustment expenses to net
premiums earned, net of the effects of reinsurance. |
|
(2) |
Expense ratio: The expense ratio is the ratio, expressed
as a percentage, of acquisition and other operating expenses to
net premiums earned. Our reported expense ratio excludes certain
holding company expenses such as interest expense as well as
real estate and rescission expenses. |
|
(3) |
Combined ratio: The combined ratio is the sum of the
losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio and the expense ratio. |
|
|
(4) |
Return on average shareholders equity: Return on
average shareholders equity is the ratio, expressed as a
percentage, of net earnings, excluding realized gains and
losses, to the average of the beginning of period and end of
period total shareholders equity, excluding accumulated
other comprehensive income. |
|
|
(5) |
Debt to total capitalization ratio: The debt to total
capitalization ratio is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of
total debt to the sum of total debt and shareholders
equity. The Companys total debt consists solely of loans
payable. |
9
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the Common Shares involves a number of
risks, some of which relate to American Safety Insurance and its
business, some of which relate to the property and casualty
insurance industry generally and some of which relate to the
Common Shares. You should carefully review the following
information about these risks together with other information
contained in this prospectus before purchasing any Common
Shares.
Risk Factors Relating to American Safety Insurance
|
|
|
A downgrade in our A.M. Best rating or increased capital
requirements could impair our ability to sell insurance
policies. |
Some policyholders are required to obtain insurance coverage
from insurance companies that have an A- (Excellent)
rating or higher from A.M. Best, the most widely recognized
insurance company rating agency. Additionally, many producers
are prohibited by their internal guidelines from representing
insurance companies that are rated below A-
(Excellent) by A.M. Best. In November 2005, A.M. Best reaffirmed
its rating of A (Excellent), with a
negative outlook on a group basis of American Safety
Insurance, including our two U.S. insurance subsidiaries,
our Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary and our
U.S. non-subsidiary risk retention group affiliate. An
A (Excellent) rating is assigned to companies that
have, in the opinion of A.M. Best, an excellent ability to meet
their ongoing obligations to policyholders. A.M. Best assigned a
negative outlook to the rating in September 2004 in
response to our reserve strengthening in the second quarter of
2004 because of a concern by A.M. Best with the underwriting
results from our core business lines and the potential for
further reserve strengthening in the future. A.M. Best
reaffirmed this rating and outlook in November 2005. If A.M.
Best requires us to increase our capital in order to maintain
our rating and we are unable to raise the required amount of
capital to be contributed to our insurance subsidiaries, A.M.
Best may downgrade us.
A.M. Best assigns ratings that represent an independent opinion
of an insurers ability to meet its obligations to
policyholders that is of concern primarily to policyholders,
insurance brokers and agents and its rating and outlook should
not be considered an investment recommendation. Because A.M.
Best continually monitors companies with regard to their
ratings, our ratings could change at any time, and any downgrade
of our current rating could impair our ability to sell insurance
policies and, ultimately, our financial condition and operating
results.
|
|
|
The exclusions and limitations in our policies may not be
enforceable. |
We draft the terms and conditions of our excess and surplus
lines policies to manage our exposure to expanding theories of
legal liability in business lines such as asbestos abatement,
construction defect, environmental and professional liability.
Many of the policies we issue include exclusions or other
conditions that define and limit coverage. In addition, many of
our policies limit the period during which a policyholder may
bring a claim under the policy, which period in many cases is
shorter than the statutory period under which these claims can
be brought against our policyholders. While these exclusions and
limitations help us assess and control our loss exposure, it is
possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or
void an exclusion or limitation, or legislation could be enacted
modifying or barring the use of these exclusions and
limitations, particularly with respect to evolving business
lines such as construction defect. This could result in higher
than anticipated losses and loss adjustment expenses by
extending coverage beyond our underwriting intent or increasing
the number or size of claims, which could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results. In some instances,
these changes may not become apparent until some time after we
have issued the insurance policies that are affected by the
changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our
insurance contracts may not be known for many years after a
policy is issued.
10
|
|
|
The risks we underwrite are concentrated in relatively few
industries. |
We focus much of our underwriting on specialty risks in the
construction and environmental remediation industries. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 61.6% of our
gross premiums written were in these two industries. In
addition, we plan to use a portion of the net proceeds from this
offering to increase our retention in certain business lines
that we currently write, increasing our exposure to unfavorable
changes in these industries. Accordingly, our operating results
could be more exposed than our more diversified competitors to
unfavorable changes in business, economic or regulatory
conditions, changes in federal, state or local environmental
standards and establishment of legal precedents affecting these
industries. Similarly, a significant incident impacting one of
these industries that has the effect of increasing claims
generally (or their settlement value) could negatively impact
our financial condition and operating results.
|
|
|
We may respond to market trends by expanding or
contracting our underwriting activities, which may cause our
financial results to be volatile. |
Although we perform substantial due diligence and risk analysis
before entering into a new business line or insuring a new type
of risk, and carefully assess the impact of exiting a business
line, changing business lines inherently has more risk than
remaining in the same business lines over a period of time.
Because we actively seek to expand or contract our capacity in
the markets we serve in response to factors such as loss
experience and premium production, our operating results may
experience material fluctuations.
|
|
|
Our industry is highly competitive and we may lack the
financial resources to compete effectively. |
We believe that competition in the specialty insurance markets
that we target is fragmented and not dominated by one or more
competitors. We face competition from several companies, such as
insurance companies, reinsurance companies, underwriting
agencies, program managers and captive insurance companies. Many
of our competitors are significantly larger and possess greater
financial, marketing and management resources than we do. We
compete on the basis of many factors, including coverage
availability, claims management, payment terms, premium rates,
policy terms, types of insurance offered, overall financial
strength, financial strength ratings and reputation. If any of
our competitors offers premium rates, policy terms or types of
insurance that are more competitive than ours, we could lose
business. If we are unable to compete effectively in the markets
in which we operate or to establish a competitive position in
new markets, our financial condition and operating results would
be adversely impacted.
|
|
|
Our actual incurred losses may be greater than reserves
for our losses and loss adjustment expenses. |
Insurance companies are required to maintain reserves to cover
their estimated liability for losses and loss adjustment
expenses with respect to both reported and incurred but not
reported (IBNR) claims. Reserves are estimates at a
given time involving actuarial and statistical projections of
what we expect to be the cost of the ultimate resolution and
administration of claims. These estimates are based on facts and
circumstances then known, predictions of future events,
estimates of future trends, projected claims frequency and
severity, potential judicial expansion of liability precedents,
legislative activity and other factors, such as inflation. A
full actuarial analysis of our reserves is performed on an
annual basis, which may include reserve studies, rate studies
and regulatory opinions.
Notwithstanding these efforts, the establishment of appropriate
reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses is an
inherently uncertain process, particularly in the environmental
remediation industry, construction industry and some of the
other industries for which we write policies where extensive
historical data may not exist or where the risks insured are
long-tail in nature, in that claims that have occurred may not
be reported to us for long periods of time. For instance, there
is little empirical data for residential construction defect
claims and hence, traditional actuarial analysis may be
inapplicable or less reliable, which may cause our reserve
estimates for this business line to be more volatile. Due to
these
11
uncertainties, our ultimate losses could materially exceed our
reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses, especially in
business lines where we intend to increase our risk retention.
For example, during the last two years, we increased our loss
reserves as a result of litigation matters specifically related
to our construction lines policies and policies written on
runoff lines, which lowered our net earnings and
shareholders equity during these periods.
To the extent that reserves for losses or loss adjustment
expenses are estimated in the future to be inadequate, we would
have to increase our reserves and incur charges to earnings in
the periods in which the reserves are increased. In addition,
increases in reserves may also cause additional reinsurance
premiums to be payable to our reinsurers in the form of
reinstatement premiums. These increases in reserves and
reinstatement premiums would adversely impact our financial
condition and operating results. To the extent any individual
case reserves prove to be inadequate, our financial condition
and operating results would be adversely affected. For more
information on our losses and loss adjustment expenses, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
If we are unable to obtain reinsurance on favorable terms,
our ability to write new polices would be adversely
affected. |
Reinsurance is a contractual arrangement under which one insurer
(the ceding company) transfers to another insurer (the
reinsurer) a portion of the liabilities that the ceding company
has assumed under an insurance policy it has issued. Our
business continues to involve ceding portions of the risks that
we underwrite to reinsurers. The availability and cost of
reinsurance are subject to prevailing market conditions that are
beyond our control and are factors that could materially impact
our financial condition and operating results. There is no
certainty that reinsurance will continue to be available in the
form or in the amount that we require or, if available, at an
affordable cost. The availability of reinsurance is dependent
not only on reinsurers reactions to the specific risks
that we underwrite, but also events that impact the overall
reinsurance industry, such as the recent hurricanes in 2005. If
we are unable to maintain or replace our reinsurance, our total
loss exposure would increase and, if we were unwilling or unable
to assume that increase in exposure, we would be required to
mitigate the increase in exposure by writing fewer policies or
writing policies with lower limits or different coverage.
|
|
|
We may be unable to recover amounts due from our
reinsurers. |
While reinsurance contractually obligates the reinsurer to
reimburse us for a portion of our losses, it does not relieve us
of our primary financial liability to our insureds. If our
reinsurers are either unwilling or unable to pay some or all of
the claims made by us on a timely basis, we bear the financial
exposure. As a result, we are subject to credit risk with
respect to our reinsurers. The total amount of reinsurance
recoverables at December 31, 2005 was $203.4 million,
or 171.7% of shareholders equity. Of this amount,
$72.2 million, or approximately 35.5% of the total amount
recoverable was collateralized by cash, irrevocable letters of
credit or other acceptable forms of collateral posted by the
reinsurer.
We purchase reinsurance from reinsurers we believe to be
financially sound. We have written reinsurance security
procedures that establish financial requirements for reinsurance
companies that must be met prior to reinsuring any of the
business we write. Among these requirements is a stipulation
that reinsurance companies must have an A.M. Best rating of at
least A- (Excellent) and a financial size category
of Class VIII or greater at the time of writing any
reinsurance unless sufficient collateral has been provided at
the time we enter into our reinsurance agreement. A financial
size category of Class VIII is assigned by A.M. Best to
companies with adjusted policyholder surplus of
$100 million to $250 million, which, on a statutory
basis of accounting, is the amount remaining after all
liabilities, including loss reserves, are subtracted from all
admitted assets. We have also established an internal
reinsurance security committee, consisting of members of senior
management, which meets quarterly to discuss and approve
reinsurance security. To protect against our reinsurers
inability to satisfy their contractual obligations to us, our
reinsurance contracts stipulate a collateral requirement for
reinsurance companies that do not meet the financial strength
and size requirements described above. These collateral
requirements can be met through the issuance of unconditional
letters of credit, the establishment and funding of escrow
accounts
12
for our benefit or cash advances paid into a segregated account.
In the event collateral is not sufficient, there is no certainty
that these reinsurers will be able to provide additional capital.
We are unable to ensure the credit worthiness of our reinsurers.
For example, in 2005 and 2006, as a result of significant
adverse loss reserve development, A.M. Best and Standard and
Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
(S&P), downgraded the financial strength ratings
of the insurance and reinsurance operating subsidiaries of Alea
Group Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd. (Alea) several times.
Subsequently, Alea requested that A.M. Best withdraw all ratings
of Alea. A.M. Best currently has assigned an NR-4 (Company
Request) to Alea. As of December 31, 2005, our unsecured
estimated net exposure to Alea was approximately
$8.8 million, primarily related to our specialty programs
business line. This estimate was based upon our estimates of
losses and will not reflect our exposure if our actual losses
differ from those estimates. While Alea continues to indemnify
us under our reinsurance agreements, we are in the process of
removing Alea as one of our reinsurers.
|
|
|
We are subject to risks related to litigation. |
From time to time, we are subject to lawsuits and other claims
arising out of our insurance and real estate operations. We have
responded to the lawsuits we face and, although the outcome of
these lawsuits cannot be predicted, we believe that there are
meritorious defenses and intend to vigorously contest these
claims. Adverse judgments in one or more of these lawsuits could
require us to change aspects of our operations in addition to
paying significant damage amounts. In addition, the expenses
related to these lawsuits may be significant. Lawsuits can have
a material adverse effect on our business and operating results,
particularly where we have not established an accrual, or a
sufficient accrual, for damages or expenses. For information on
the material litigation in which we are involved, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Legal
Proceedings.
|
|
|
We rely on independent insurance agents and brokers to
market our products. |
We market most of our insurance products through approximately
230 independent insurance agents and brokers, which we refer to
as producers. These producers are not obligated to promote our
products and may sell competitors products. Our
profitability depends, in part, on the marketing efforts of
these producers and on our ability to offer insurance products
and services while maintaining financial strength ratings that
meet the requirements of our producers and their customers. The
failure or inability of producers to market our insurance
products successfully would have a material adverse effect on
our business and operating results. Furthermore, as of
December 31, 2005, approximately 45.0% of our gross
premiums written for our excess and surplus lines segment (or
approximately 28.2% of our aggregate gross premiums written)
were produced through two producers (who focus on our
construction business line). The loss of one or more of these
producers could have a material adverse effect on our operating
results.
|
|
|
We are subject to credit risk in connection with producers
that market our products. |
In accordance with industry practice, when the insured pays
premiums for our policies to producers for payment over to us,
these premiums are considered to have been paid and, in most
cases, the insured is no longer liable to us for those amounts,
whether or not we actually have received the premiums.
Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with
the producers with whom we choose to do business. To date, we
have not experienced any material losses related to these credit
risks.
13
|
|
|
Our growth strategy is dependent on several factors, the
failure to achieve any one of which may impair our ability to
expand our operations or may prevent us from operating
profitably. |
Our growth strategy includes expanding in our existing markets,
entering new geographic markets, creating relationships with new
producers and developing new insurance products. In order to
generate this growth, we are subject to various risks, including
risks associated with our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
identify insurable risks not adequately served by the standard
insurance market; |
|
|
|
maintain adequate levels of capital; |
|
|
|
obtain reinsurance on favorable terms; |
|
|
|
obtain necessary regulatory approvals when writing on an
admitted basis; |
|
|
|
attract and retain qualified personnel to manage our expanded
operations; and |
|
|
|
maintain our financial strength ratings. |
Our inability to achieve any of the above objectives could
affect our growth strategy and may cause our business and
operating results to suffer.
|
|
|
If we lose key personnel or are unable to recruit
qualified personnel, our ability to implement our business
strategies could be delayed or hindered. |
Our future success will depend, in part, upon the efforts of our
executive officers and other key personnel. Our ability to
recruit and retain key personnel will depend upon a number of
factors, such as our results of operations, business prospects
and the level of competition then prevailing in the market for
qualified personnel. The loss of any of these officers or other
key personnel or our inability to recruit key personnel could
prevent us from fully implementing our business strategies and
could materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and operating results.
|
|
|
We routinely evaluate opportunities to expand our business
through acquisitions of other companies or business lines. There
are many risks associated with acquisitions that we may be
unable to control. |
We evaluate potential acquisition opportunities as a means to
grow our business. There are a number of risks attendant to any
acquisition. These risks include, among others, the difficulty
in integrating the operations and personnel of an acquired
company; potential disruption of our ongoing business; inability
to successfully integrate acquired systems and insurance
programs into our operations; maintenance of uniform standards,
controls and procedures; possible impairment of relationships
with employees and insureds of an acquired business as a result
of changes in management; and that the acquired business may not
produce the level of expected profitability. As a result, the
impact of any acquisition on our future performance may not be
consistent with original expectations, and may impair our
business, financial condition and operating results.
|
|
|
We may require additional capital in the future, which may
not be available or may only be available on unfavorable
terms. |
Our future capital requirements depend on many factors,
including our ability to write profitable new business, retain
existing customers and establish premium rates and reserves at
levels sufficient to cover losses and related expenses. To the
extent that the net proceeds from this offering are insufficient
to fund future operating costs and potential losses and loss
adjustment expenses, we may need to raise additional funds
through financings or curtail our growth. Many factors will
affect our capital needs and their amount and timing, including
our growth and profitability, our claims experience and the
availability of reinsurance, as well as possible acquisition
opportunities, market disruptions and other unforeseeable
developments. If we have to raise additional capital, equity or
debt financing may not be available at all or may be available
only on terms that are unfavorable to us. In the case of equity
financings, dilution to our shareholders could result. In any
case, those securities may have rights, preferences and
privileges that are
14
senior to those of the Common Shares offered hereby. In the case
of debt financings, we may be subject to covenants that restrict
our ability to freely operate our business. If we cannot obtain
adequate capital on favorable terms or at all, we may not have
sufficient funds to implement our operating plans and our
business, financial condition and operating results could be
adversely affected.
|
|
|
Changes in the value of our investment portfolio may have
a material impact on our operating results. |
We derive a significant portion of our net income from our
invested assets. As a result, our operating results depend in
part on the performance of our investment portfolio. As of, and
for the year ended December 31, 2005, the fair value of our
investment portfolio was $415.5 million and our income
derived from these assets was $14.3 million, or 89.2%, of
our pre-tax earnings. As of, and for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, the fair value of our investment portfolio
was $421.5 million and our income derived from these assets
was $4.5 million, or 110.4%, of our pre-tax earnings. Our
investment portfolio is subject to various risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
credit risk, which is the risk that our invested assets will
decrease in value due to unfavorable changes in the financial
prospects or a downgrade in the credit rating of an entity in
which we have invested; |
|
|
|
interest rate risk, which is the risk that our invested assets
may decrease due to changes in interest rates; |
|
|
|
equity price risk, which is the risk that we will incur economic
loss due to a decline in equity prices; and |
|
|
|
duration risk, which is the risk that our invested assets may
not adequately match the duration of our insurance liabilities. |
Our investment portfolio is comprised mostly of fixed-income
securities. We do not hedge our investments against interest
rate risk and, accordingly, changes in interest rates may result
in fluctuations in the value of these investments.
Our investment portfolio is managed by a professional investment
management firm in accordance with detailed investment
guidelines established by our Board of Directors that stress
diversification of risks, conservation of principal and
liquidity. If our investment portfolio is not appropriately
matched with our insurance and reinsurance liabilities, we may
be forced to liquidate investments prior to their maturity at a
significant loss in order to cover these liabilities. This might
occur, for instance, in the event of a large or unexpected claim
or series of claims. Large investment losses could significantly
decrease our asset base, thereby affecting our ability to
underwrite new business. For more information about our
investment portfolio, see Business
Investments.
|
|
|
We rely upon the successful and uninterrupted functioning
of our information technology, information processing and
telecommunication systems. |
Our business is highly dependent upon the successful and
uninterrupted functioning of our information technology,
information processing and telecommunications systems. We rely
on these systems to support our marketing operations, process
new and renewal business, provide customer service, make claims
payments and facilitate premium collections and policy
cancellations. These systems also enable us to perform actuarial
and other modeling functions necessary for underwriting and rate
development. We have a highly trained staff that is committed to
the development and maintenance of these systems. However, the
failure of these systems could interrupt our operations or
materially impact our ability to evaluate and write new
business. Because our information technology, information
processing and telecommunications systems interface with and
depend on third party systems, we could experience service
denials if demand for this service exceeds capacity or if the
third party systems fail or experience interruptions. If
sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could
result in a deterioration of our ability to write and process
new and renewal business and provide customer service or
compromise our ability to pay claims in a timely manner. There
can be no guarantee that these systems can effectively support
our continued
15
growth. Additionally, some of our systems are not fully
redundant, and our disaster recovery planning does not account
for all eventualities, which could adversely affect our business.
Risk Factors Related to Taxation
|
|
|
Our Bermuda operations may be subject to
U.S. tax. |
American Safety Insurance, its reinsurance subsidiary, American
Safety Reinsurance (American Safety Re), and its
segregated account captive, American Safety Assurance Ltd.
(American Safety Assurance), are organized in
Bermuda. American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and
American Safety Assurance are operated in a manner such that
none should be subject to U.S. tax (other than
U.S. excise tax on insurance and reinsurance premium income
attributable to insuring or reinsuring U.S. risks and
U.S. withholding tax on some types of U.S. source
investment income) because none of these companies should be
treated as engaged in a trade or business within the
U.S. (and, in the case of American Safety Re and American
Safety Assurance, to be doing business through a permanent
establishment within the U.S.). However, because there is
considerable uncertainty as to the activities that constitute
being engaged in a trade or business within the U.S. (and
what constitutes a permanent establishment under the income tax
treaty between the U.S. and Bermuda (the Bermuda
Treaty) as well as the entitlement of American Safety Re
and American Safety Assurance to treaty benefits), there can be
no assurances that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) will not contend successfully that American
Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and/or American Safety
Assurance is engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. (or
that American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance is carrying
on business through a permanent establishment in the U.S.). If
any of American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re or American
Safety Assurance were considered to be engaged in a trade or
business in the U.S., it could be subject to U.S. corporate
income taxes and additional branch profits taxes on the portion
of its earnings effectively connected to such
U.S. business, in which case its operating results could be
materially adversely affected. See Certain Tax
Considerations Certain U.S. Federal Tax
Considerations U.S. Taxation of American Safety
Insurance and its Bermuda Subsidiaries.
|
|
|
If you acquire 10% or more of the Common Shares, you may
be subject to taxation under the controlled foreign
corporation (CFC) rules. |
Under certain circumstances, a U.S. 10%
shareholder (as defined in Certain Tax
Considerations Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations Tax Treatment of
Shareholders Classification as a Controlled Foreign
Corporation) of a foreign corporation that is a CFC for an
uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during a taxable
year must include in gross income for U.S. federal income
tax purposes that U.S. 10% shareholders Subpart
F Income, even if the Subpart F Income is not
distributed to that U.S. 10% shareholder. Subpart F
Income of a foreign insurance corporation typically
includes foreign personal holding company income (such as
interest, dividends and other types of passive income), as well
as insurance and reinsurance income (including underwriting and
investment income) attributable to the insurance of risks
situated outside the CFCs country of incorporation.
We believe that because of the dispersion of our Common Share
ownership, provisions in our organizational documents that limit
voting power and other factors, no U.S. person who acquires
Common Shares directly or indirectly through one or more foreign
entities should be required to include our Subpart F
Income in income under the CFC rules of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). It is
possible, however, that the IRS could challenge the
effectiveness of these provisions and that a court could sustain
that challenge, in which case your investment could be
materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
U.S. persons who hold Common Shares may be subject to
U.S. federal income taxation at ordinary income rates on
their proportionate share of our related party insurance
income (RPII). |
If the RPII of American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance
were to equal or exceed 20% of its gross insurance income in any
taxable year and direct or indirect insureds (and persons
related to those
16
insureds) own directly or indirectly through entities 20% or
more of the voting power or value of American Safety Re or
American Safety Assurance, then a U.S. person who owns any
Common Shares (directly or indirectly through foreign entities)
on the last day of the taxable year would be required to include
in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes that
persons pro rata share of that companys RPII for the
entire taxable year, determined as if that RPII were distributed
proportionately only to U.S. persons at that date
regardless of whether that income is distributed. In addition,
any RPII that is includible in the income of a
U.S. tax-exempt organization may be treated as unrelated
business taxable income. Neither American Safety Re nor American
Safety Assurance expects gross RPII to equal or exceed 20% of
its gross income for 2005 or subsequent years, and neither
expects its direct or indirect insureds (including related
persons) to directly or indirectly hold 20% or more of its
voting power or value, but we cannot be certain that this will
be the case because some of the factors which determine the
extent of RPII may be beyond our control. If these thresholds
are met or exceeded, and if you are an affected
U.S. person, your investment could be materially adversely
affected. The RPII provisions, however, have never been
interpreted by the courts or the U.S. Treasury Department
(the Treasury Department) in final regulations, and
regulations interpreting the RPII provisions of the Code exist
only in proposed form. It is not certain whether these
regulations will be adopted in their proposed form or what
changes or clarifications might ultimately be made thereto or
whether any of those changes, as well as any interpretation or
application of RPII by the IRS, the courts or otherwise, might
have retroactive effect. The Treasury Department has authority
to impose, among other things, additional reporting requirements
with respect to RPII. Accordingly, the meaning of the RPII
provisions and the application thereof to us is uncertain. See
Certain Tax Considerations Certain
U.S. Federal Tax Considerations Tax Treatment
of Shareholders Related Person Insurance
Income.
|
|
|
U.S. persons who dispose of Common Shares may be
subject to U.S. federal income taxation at the rates
applicable to dividends on a portion of their gain, if
any. |
Section 1248 of the Code provides that if a
U.S. person sells or exchanges stock of a foreign
corporation and that person owned, directly, indirectly through
certain foreign entities or constructively, 10% or more of the
voting power of the corporation at any time during the five-year
period ending on the date of disposition when the corporation
was a CFC, any gain from the sale or exchange of the shares will
be treated as a dividend to the extent of that persons
share of the CFCs earnings and profits (determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles) during the period that
person held the shares and while the corporation was a CFC (with
certain adjustments). We believe that because of the dispersion
of our Common Share ownership, provisions in our organizational
documents that limit voting power and other factors, no
U.S. shareholder of American Safety Insurance, other than
Frederick C. Treadway or Treadway Associates, L.P., or their
successors, heirs or assigns, should be treated as owning
(directly, indirectly through foreign entities or
constructively) 10% or more of the total voting power of
American Safety Insurance. As a result, American Safety
Insurance should not be a CFC and Section 1248 of the Code,
as applicable under the general CFC rules, should not apply to
dispositions of our shares. It is possible, however, that the
IRS could challenge these provisions in our organizational
documents and that a court could sustain that challenge. To the
extent American Safety Insurance is a CFC, a 10%
U.S. Shareholder may in certain circumstances be required
to report a disposition of Common Shares by attaching IRS
Form 5471 to the U.S. federal income tax or
information return that it would normally file for the taxable
year in which the disposition occurs.
For purposes of Section 1248 of the Code and the
requirement to file Form 5471, special rules apply with
respect to a U.S. persons disposition of shares of a
foreign insurance company that has RPII during the five-year
period ending on the date of the disposition. In general, if a
U.S. person disposes of shares in a foreign insurance
corporation in which U.S. persons own 25% or more of the
shares (even if the amount of gross RPII is less than 20% of the
corporations gross insurance income and the ownership of
its shares by direct or indirect insureds and related persons is
less than the 20% threshold), any gain from the disposition will
generally be treated as a dividend to the extent of that
persons shares of the corporations undistributed
earnings and profits that were accumulated during the period
that person owned the shares (whether or not those earnings and
profits are attributable to RPII). As a result of the special
rules and
17
proposed Treasury Department regulations, the IRS may assert
that Section 1248 of the Code and the requirements to file
Form 5471 apply to dispositions of Common Shares because
American Safety Insurance is engaged in the insurance business
indirectly through subsidiaries. See Certain Tax
Considerations Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations Tax Treatment of
Shareholders Dispositions of Shares in a CFC or RPII
CFC.
|
|
|
U.S. persons who hold Common Shares will be subject
to adverse tax consequences if American Safety Insurance is
considered to be a Passive Foreign Investment Company (a
PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. |
If American Safety Insurance is considered a PFIC for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. person who
owns Common Shares will be subject to adverse tax consequences,
including subjecting the investor to a greater tax liability
than might otherwise apply and subjecting the investor to tax on
amounts in advance of when tax would otherwise be imposed, in
which case your investment could be materially adversely
affected. In addition, if American Safety Insurance were
considered a PFIC, upon the death of any U.S. individual
owning Common Shares, that individuals heirs or estate
would not be entitled to a
step-up in
the basis of the shares which might otherwise be available under
U.S. federal income tax laws. American Safety Insurance
does not believe that it is, and does not expect to become, a
PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. No assurance can
be given, however, that American Safety Insurance will not be
deemed a PFIC by the IRS. If American Safety Insurance were
considered a PFIC, it could have material adverse tax
consequences for an investor that is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation. There are currently no
regulations regarding the application of the PFIC provisions to
an insurance company. New regulations or pronouncements
interpreting or clarifying these rules may be forthcoming. We
cannot predict what impact, if any, that guidance would have on
an investor that is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation. See Certain Tax Considerations
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
Tax Treatment of Shareholders Passive Foreign
Investment Company.
|
|
|
American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and American
Safety Assurance may become subject to Bermuda taxes in the
future. |
Bermuda currently imposes no income tax on corporations.
American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re and American
Safety Assurance have received an assurance from the Bermuda
Minister of Finance, under The Exempted Undertakings Tax
Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda, as amended (the Tax
Protection Act), that if any legislation is enacted in
Bermuda that would impose tax computed on profits or income, or
computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax
in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the
imposition of that tax will not be applicable to American Safety
Insurance, American Safety Re or American Safety Assurance until
March 28, 2016. No assurance can be given that American
Safety Insurance, American Safety Re or American Safety
Assurance will not be subject to any Bermuda tax after that date.
|
|
|
The impact of Bermudas letter of commitment to the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to
eliminate harmful tax practices is uncertain and could adversely
affect American Safety Insurances, American Safety
Res and American Safety Assurances tax status in
Bermuda. |
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (the
OECD) has published reports and launched a global
dialogue among member and non-member countries on measures to
limit harmful tax competition. These measures are largely
directed at counteracting the effects of tax havens and
preferential tax regimes in countries around the world. In the
OECDs report dated April 18, 2002 and updated as of
June 2004, Bermuda was not listed as an uncooperative tax haven
jurisdiction because it had previously committed to eliminate
harmful tax practices and to embrace international tax standards
for transparency, exchange of information and the elimination of
any aspects of the regimes for financial and other services that
attract business with no substantial domestic activity. We are
not able to predict what changes will arise from the commitment
or whether these changes will subject us to additional taxes.
18
Risk Factors Relating to the Property and Casualty Insurance
Industry
|
|
|
Policy pricing in our industry is cyclical, and our
financial results are impacted by that cyclicality. |
The property and casualty insurance industry has historically
been a cyclical industry consisting of both soft
market periods and hard market periods. During
soft market periods, insurers tend to be more aggressive in
writing policies and competitive in the pricing of those
policies. Hard market periods are characterized by shortages of
underwriting capacity and high premium rates. Beginning in 2000,
we believe our industry experienced a hardening market,
reflected by increasing rates and more restrictive coverage
terms. These trends appeared to have started slowing in 2004. We
believe the industry is now experiencing a softening market,
where pricing generally has become more competitive and policy
terms and conditions have become less restrictive. Therefore, we
may not be able to achieve our growth and profitability goals.
Because this cyclicality is due in large part to the economy,
the particular needs of insureds and the actions of our
competitors, we cannot predict the timing or duration of changes
in the insurance market cycle.
|
|
|
Our industry is subject to significant and increasing
regulatory scrutiny. |
Recently, the insurance industry has been subject to a
significant and increasing level of scrutiny by various
regulatory bodies, including state attorneys general and
insurance departments, concerning certain practices within the
insurance industry. These practices include the receipt of
contingent commissions by insurance brokers and agents from
insurance companies and the extent to which this compensation
has been disclosed, bid rigging and related matters. As a result
of these and related matters, there have been a number of recent
revisions to existing, or proposals to modify or enact new, laws
and regulations regarding the relationship between insurance
companies and producers. Any changes or further requirements
that are adopted by federal, state or local governments could
adversely affect our business and operating results.
|
|
|
We operate in a heavily regulated industry, and existing
and future regulations may constrain how we conduct our business
and could impose liabilities and other obligations upon
us. |
Insurance Regulation. Our primary insurance and
reinsurance subsidiaries, as well as our non-subsidiary risk
retention group affiliate, are subject to regulation under
applicable insurance statutes of the jurisdictions in which they
are domiciled or licensed and write insurance. This regulation
may limit our ability to, or speed with which we can,
effectively respond to market opportunities and may require us
to incur significant annual regulatory compliance expenditures.
Insurance regulation is intended to provide safeguards for
policyholders rather than to protect shareholders of our
insurance companies. Insurance regulation relates to authorized
business lines, capital and surplus requirements, types and
amounts of investments, underwriting limitations, trade
practices, policy forms, claims practices, mandated
participation in shared markets, loss reserve adequacy, insurer
solvency, transactions with related parties, changes in control,
payment of dividends and a variety of other financial and
nonfinancial components of an insurance companys business.
For instance, our insurance subsidiaries are subject to
risk-based capital, or RBC, restrictions. RBC is a method of
measuring the amount of capital appropriate for an insurance
company to support its overall business in light of its size and
risk profile. The ratio of a companys actual policyholder
surplus to its minimum capital requirements will determine
whether any state regulatory action is required. State
regulatory authorities use the RBC formula to identify insurance
companies which may be undercapitalized and may require further
regulatory attention. Each of our domestic insurance
subsidiaries satisfies its minimum capital requirements and none
of them has been identified by any regulatory authority as being
undercapitalized or requiring further regulatory attention. A
number of legislative initiatives currently are under
consideration by Congress. Any changes in insurance laws and
regulations could materially adversely affect our operating
results. We are unable to predict what additional laws and
regulations, if any, affecting our business may be promulgated
in the future or how they might be interpreted.
Dividend Regulation. Like other insurance holding
companies, American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. relies
on dividends from its insurance subsidiaries to be able to pay
dividends and fulfill its other
19
financial obligations. The payment of dividends by these
subsidiaries and other intercompany transactions are subject to
regulatory restrictions and will depend on the surplus and
earnings of these subsidiaries. As a result, insurance holding
companies may not be able to receive dividends from their
subsidiaries at times and in amounts sufficient to pay dividends
and fulfill their other financial obligations. Additionally, as
a Bermuda holding company, American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd. is subject to Bermuda regulatory constraints that will
affect its ability to pay dividends on the Common Shares and to
make other payments. Under the Companies Act, 1981 of Bermuda
(the Companies Act), insurance holding companies may
declare or pay a dividend out of distributable reserves only if
it has reasonable grounds to believe that it is, and would after
the payment be, able to pay liabilities as they become due and
if the realizable value of its assets would thereby not be less
than the aggregate of its liabilities and issued share capital
and share premium accounts. We do not anticipate paying cash
dividends on the Common Shares in the near future.
Environmental Regulation. Environmental remediation
activities and other environmental risks are heavily regulated
by both federal and state governments. Environmental regulation
is continually evolving, and changes in the regulatory patterns
at federal and state levels may have a significant effect upon
potential claims against our insureds and us. These changes also
may affect the demand for the types of insurance offered by and
through us and the availability or cost to us of reinsurance. We
are unable to predict what additional laws and regulations, if
any, affecting environmental remediation activities and other
environmental risks may be promulgated in the future, how they
might be applied, and what their impact might be.
Risk Factors Relating to the Common Shares
|
|
|
Our stock price may be subject to significant
fluctuations. |
The stock price for the Common Shares may fluctuate in response
to a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
quarterly variations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
changes in expectations about our future operating results; |
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities
analysts concerning us or the insurance industry generally; |
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of other companies that
investors may deem comparable; |
|
|
|
news reports relating to our business and trends in our markets; |
|
|
|
changes in the laws and regulations affecting our business; |
|
|
|
acquisitions and financings by us or others in the insurance
industry; and |
|
|
|
sales, or the possibility of future sales, of substantial
amounts of Common Shares by our executive officers, directors or
principal shareholders, or the perception that these sales will
or could occur. |
Common Shares held by our executive officers and directors are
subject to lock-up
agreements for a period of 90 days after the date of the
underwriting agreement. See Underwriting.
|
|
|
The trading market for the Common Shares is thin, which
could result in illiquidity of an investment in the Common
Shares. |
The Common Shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The
average daily trading volume of the 52 weeks ended
June 19, 2006 was approximately 12,600 shares. While
the Common Shares to be sold in this offering will increase the
number of shares available for trading, a more active trading
market may not develop and, if it does develop, it may not be
sustained, which could result in illiquidity of an investment in
the Common Shares.
20
|
|
|
Limitations on share ownership and voting rights might
prevent a third party from acquiring us. |
Our Bye-Laws provide that no shareholder may vote more than 9.5%
of the outstanding Common Shares, regardless of the percentage
of the Common Shares a shareholder owns. This restriction does
not apply to Frederick C. Treadway (one of our founders) or
Treadway Associates, L.P., a limited partnership owned by
Mr. Treadway and his children, including their respective
heirs, successors and assigns. Additionally, this provision may
only be amended with the consent of Mr. Treadway or
Treadway Associates, L.P.
Our Bye-Laws contain other provisions that may be viewed as
preventing a third party from acquiring us. Specifically, our
Bye-Laws prohibit an interested shareholder of
American Safety Insurance from either directly or indirectly
being a party to or taking any action in connection with any
business combination with American Safety Insurance
for a period of five years following the date that person first
became an interested shareholder, unless
(a) the business combination was approved by a
prior resolution of the continuing directors of our
Board of Directors or (b) the business
combination was approved by a prior resolution of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting shares of American Safety Insurance
other than those voting shares beneficially held by an
interested shareholder. Under these provisions,
Mr. Treadway and Treadway Associates L.P., and their
respective heirs, successors and assigns, are not interested
shareholders. Our Bye-Laws require the affirmative vote of at
least
662/3
% of the outstanding voting shares to amend, repeal or
adopt any provision inconsistent with the foregoing provision.
In addition, our Bye-Laws provide for a classified or
staggered Board of Directors.
These provisions could have the effect of discouraging a
prospective acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise
attempting to acquire us. To the extent that these provisions
discourage takeover attempts, they could deprive shareholders of
opportunities to realize takeover premiums for their shares or
could depress the market price of the Common Shares. Further,
any acquisition of us would require the prior approval of the
Bermuda Monetary Authority. In addition, under Delaware and
Oklahoma law, as a result of our ownership of American Safety
Casualty Insurance Company and American Safety Indemnity
Company, respectively, no person may obtain 10% or more of our
voting shares without the prior approval of the insurance
departments of those states. For more information on the
limitations on our share ownership and the ability to exercise
voting power on our shares, see Description of the Common
Shares.
* * * * * *
The risk factors presented above are all of the ones we consider
material as of the date of this prospectus. However, they are
not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks not
presently known to us, or which we consider immaterial, may also
adversely affect us. There may be risks that a particular
investor views differently from us, and our analysis may be
incorrect. If any of the risks that we face actually occurs, our
business, financial condition and operating results could be
materially adversely affected and could differ materially from
any possible results suggested by any forward-looking statements
that we have made or might make. In that case, the trading price
of the Common Shares could decline, and you could lose part or
all of your investment. We expressly disclaim any obligation to
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
required by law.
21
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this prospectus are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of U.S. securities laws. You
can generally identify these statements by the use of
forward-looking terminology, such as may,
will, expect, estimate,
anticipate, believe, target,
plan, project or continue or
the negatives or other variations or similar terminology.
Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and other factors, including
prevailing interest rate levels and stock market performance,
which may affect our ability to sell our insurance products and
services, the market value of our investments and the lapse rate
and profitability of our policies; |
|
|
|
the availability and terms of future strategic acquisitions; |
|
|
|
changes in the federal income tax laws and regulations which may
affect the relative tax advantages of some of our products; |
|
|
|
legal or regulatory changes or actions, including those relating
to the underwriting of insurance products, regulation of the
sale, underwriting and pricing of insurance products and
services; |
|
|
|
our ability to maintain or improve our current rating by A.M.
Best; |
|
|
|
expectations regarding the adequacy of our reserves for losses
and loss adjustment expenses; |
|
|
|
our ability to leverage our relationships with producers; |
|
|
|
our areas of projected growth, growth opportunities and growth
strategy; |
|
|
|
our ability to expand our information technology capabilities; |
|
|
|
the diversification of our insurance risk portfolio; and |
|
|
|
our future liquidity requirements. |
Actual results may differ materially from the results suggested
by the forward-looking statements for a number of reasons,
including the risks described under the caption Risk
Factors beginning on page 10. We have made these
statements based on our plans and analyses of our company, our
business and the insurance industry as a whole. Although we
believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking
statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the
assumptions could over time prove to be inaccurate and,
therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking
statements included in this prospectus will themselves prove to
be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent
in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion
of this information should not be regarded as a representation
by us or any other person that our objectives will be achieved.
We expressly disclaim any obligation to update any
forward-looking statement unless required by law.
You may rely on the information contained in this prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide information different from
that contained in this prospectus. Neither the delivery of this
prospectus nor the sale of the Common Shares means that
information contained in this prospectus is correct after the
date of this prospectus and, except to the extent required by
law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to update the
information. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or
solicitation of an offer to buy the Common Shares in any
circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful.
22
USE OF PROCEEDS
The net proceeds of this offering to the Company are expected to
be $48,509,760, assuming a public offering price of
$16.24 per share and after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses. We intend to
use the net proceeds from the sale of the Common Shares in this
offering to implement our business and growth strategy by
(i) increasing the capital and surplus base of our
insurance subsidiaries in order to expand in the markets where
we currently operate and to retain additional premium on the
policies we currently underwrite and (ii) use the balance
of the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including
potential acquisitions. The precise amounts and timing of
expenditures of the net proceeds will depend on our funding
requirements and the availability of other capital resources.
23
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
There are no selling shareholders participating in the Offering.
24
DIVIDEND POLICY
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on the Common Shares
in the near future. In the past, we have paid dividends on the
Common Shares. In June 2003, our Board of Directors decided to
suspend paying dividends on the Common Shares so that we could
retain the capital to support our growth. As an insurance
holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends to our
shareholders depends on the ability of our insurance
subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to us. The jurisdictions in
which we and our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled place
limitations on the amount of dividends or other distributions
payable by insurance companies in order to protect the solvency
of the insurers. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources,
Business Regulatory Environment and
Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements
(audited) herein regarding the limitations on our regulated
insurance subsidiaries with respect to the payment of dividends.
25
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows the consolidated capitalization of
American Safety Insurance at March 31, 2006, and as
adjusted to give effect to the receipt and application of the
estimated net proceeds from this offering specified under
Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
for this Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Short-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized
5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized
15,000,000 shares; 6,779,031 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 10,030,165 shares issued
and outstanding as adjusted for this Offering
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
49,787 |
|
|
|
98,265 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income loss
|
|
|
(4,706 |
) |
|
|
(4,706 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
74,558 |
|
|
|
74,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
119,707 |
|
|
|
168,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
157,501 |
|
|
$ |
206,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information regarding our capital resources, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
26
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Common Shares are listed and traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol ASI. As of June 19,
2006, there were approximately 2,800 record holders of the
Common Shares.
The following table sets forth the high, low and closing prices
per share of the Common Shares for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
7.33 |
|
|
|
6.69 |
|
|
$ |
6.95 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
9.15 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
8.98 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
13.60 |
|
|
|
9.03 |
|
|
|
12.35 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
11.85 |
|
|
|
13.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Close |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
|
$ |
14.56 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
13.50 |
|
|
|
15.01 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
15.21 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
13.70 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
16.45 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
|
|
|
16.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
|
$ |
14.27 |
|
|
$ |
14.90 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
15.75 |
|
|
|
14.20 |
|
|
|
15.28 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
17.98 |
|
|
|
15.17 |
|
|
|
17.24 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
18.00 |
|
|
|
16.01 |
|
|
|
16.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
16.97 |
|
|
$ |
15.60 |
|
|
$ |
16.71 |
|
Second Quarter (through June 19, 2006)
|
|
$ |
17.58 |
|
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
27
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following consolidated financial data presented below, as
of or for each of the years in the five-year period ended
December 31, 2005, are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements. The following consolidated
financial data presented below, as of or for each of the three
month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, are derived
from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. This data
is qualified in its entirety by reference to and, therefore,
should be read together with, the detailed information and
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data and ratios) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$ |
163,018 |
|
|
$ |
159,290 |
|
|
$ |
212,667 |
|
|
$ |
221,576 |
|
|
$ |
237,880 |
|
|
$ |
64,211 |
|
|
$ |
53,183 |
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
87,958 |
|
|
|
86,922 |
|
|
|
131,478 |
|
|
|
131,921 |
|
|
|
140,552 |
|
|
|
36,770 |
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
73,311 |
|
|
|
73,582 |
|
|
|
109,334 |
|
|
|
136,391 |
|
|
|
138,536 |
|
|
|
34,621 |
|
|
|
35,057 |
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
4,064 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
9,773 |
|
|
|
14,316 |
|
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
4,544 |
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
Real estate sales
|
|
|
27,561 |
|
|
|
51,780 |
|
|
|
57,555 |
|
|
|
67,967 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
108,418 |
|
|
|
130,663 |
|
|
|
175,991 |
|
|
|
214,656 |
|
|
|
155,874 |
|
|
|
40,140 |
|
|
|
40,028 |
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
45,585 |
|
|
|
42,031 |
|
|
|
65,834 |
|
|
|
93,503 |
|
|
|
84,406 |
|
|
|
20,781 |
|
|
|
22,155 |
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
15,859 |
|
|
|
14,507 |
|
|
|
21,818 |
|
|
|
26,529 |
|
|
|
28,512 |
|
|
|
7,126 |
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
|
Real estate expenses
|
|
|
25,126 |
|
|
|
48,527 |
|
|
|
53,999 |
|
|
|
55,480 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
10,090 |
|
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
4,154 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
|
14,757 |
|
|
|
14,656 |
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents used in computing net
basic earnings per share
|
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
6,737 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents used in computing net
diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments, excluding real estate
|
|
$ |
90,078 |
|
|
$ |
111,926 |
|
|
$ |
222,418 |
|
|
$ |
327,037 |
|
|
$ |
415,497 |
|
|
$ |
339,951 |
|
|
$ |
421,544 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
322,520 |
|
|
|
389,342 |
|
|
|
514,260 |
|
|
|
584,160 |
|
|
|
697,135 |
|
|
|
609,382 |
|
|
|
709,575 |
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
137,391 |
|
|
|
179,164 |
|
|
|
230,104 |
|
|
|
321,624 |
|
|
|
394,873 |
|
|
|
336,843 |
|
|
|
403,197 |
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
59,768 |
|
|
|
71,675 |
|
|
|
99,939 |
|
|
|
93,798 |
|
|
|
100,241 |
|
|
|
102,757 |
|
|
|
96,828 |
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
16,403 |
|
|
|
22,182 |
|
|
|
30,441 |
|
|
|
13,019 |
|
|
|
37,810 |
|
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
37,794 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
262,540 |
|
|
|
326,890 |
|
|
|
418,916 |
|
|
|
475,380 |
|
|
|
578,700 |
|
|
|
500,321 |
|
|
|
589,867 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
59,980 |
|
|
|
62,452 |
|
|
|
95,344 |
|
|
|
108,780 |
|
|
|
118,435 |
|
|
|
109,061 |
|
|
|
119,707 |
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data and ratios) | |
GAAP Underwriting Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
ratio(1)
|
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
68.6 |
% |
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
Expense
ratio(2)
|
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
ratio(3)
|
|
|
102.9 |
% |
|
|
101.3 |
% |
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
102.7 |
% |
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average shareholders
equity(4)
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
Debt to total capitalization
(5)
|
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
24.2 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
Net premiums written to equity
|
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
1.4 |
x |
|
|
1.2 |
x |
|
|
1.2x |
|
|
|
1.3 |
x |
|
|
1.1 |
x |
|
|
(1) |
Losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio: The losses and
loss adjustment expenses ratio is the ratio, expressed as a
percentage, of losses and loss adjustment expenses to net
premiums earned, net of the effects of reinsurance. |
|
(2) |
Expense ratio: The expense ratio is the ratio, expressed
as a percentage, of acquisition and other operating expenses to
net premiums earned. Our reported expense ratio excludes certain
holding company expenses such as interest expense as well as
real estate and rescission expenses. |
|
(3) |
Combined ratio: The combined ratio is the sum of the
losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio and the expense ratio. |
|
|
(4) |
Return on average shareholders equity: Return on
average shareholders equity is the ratio, expressed as a
percentage, of net earnings, excluding realized gains and
losses, to the average of the beginning of period and end of
period total shareholders equity, excluding accumulated
other comprehensive income. |
|
|
(5) |
Debt to total capitalization ratio: The debt to total
capitalization ratio is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of
total debt to the sum of total debt and shareholders
equity. The Companys total debt consists solely of loans
payable. |
29
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a specialty insurance company that provides customized
insurance products and solutions to small and medium-sized
businesses in industries that we believe are underserved by the
standard insurance market. For twenty years, we have developed
specialized insurance coverages and alternative risk transfer
products not generally available to our customers in the
standard insurance market because of the unique characteristics
of the risks involved and the associated needs of the insureds.
We specialize in underwriting these products for insureds with
environmental risks and construction risks as well as in
developing programs for other specialty classes of risks.
During 2005, we changed our segment reporting to coincide with
our strategic direction. In our segment reporting for periods
prior to the year ended December 31, 2005, we segregated
our business into real estate operations, insurance operations
and other (which included realized gains and losses on
investments and rescission expenses). As described in this
prospectus, we continue to segregate our business into real
estate operations, insurance operations and other, but the
insurance operations segment is further classified into three
additional segments: excess and surplus lines; alternative risk
transfer; and runoff. The excess and surplus lines segment is
then further classified into three business lines:
environmental; construction; and surety. The alternative risk
transfer segment is further classified into two business lines:
specialty programs; and fully-funded. Prior year amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Our real estate operations consist solely of our development of
the Harbour Village property as described below under
Business Harbour Village Development.
See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements for
more information on our segment reporting.
The following information is presented on the basis of
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) and should be read in conjunction
with Risk Factors, Business,
Selected Financial Data and our consolidated
financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. All amounts and percentages are rounded.
30
The table below summarizes the Companys net premiums
written and net premiums earned by business line, consolidated
revenues and percentage change period over period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
2003 to | |
|
2004 to | |
|
2005 to | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
27,233 |
|
|
$ |
35,024 |
|
|
$ |
41,477 |
|
|
$ |
10,967 |
|
|
$ |
8,071 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
(26.4 |
)% |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
73,572 |
|
|
|
77,894 |
|
|
|
78,026 |
|
|
|
22,185 |
|
|
|
20,353 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
101,539 |
|
|
|
114,092 |
|
|
|
120,848 |
|
|
|
33,402 |
|
|
|
28,864 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
Fully-Funded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
692.6 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
17,530 |
|
|
|
21,749 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
Runoff
|
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.9 |
) |
|
|
(783.9 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net premiums written
|
|
$ |
131,478 |
|
|
$ |
131,921 |
|
|
$ |
140,552 |
|
|
$ |
36,770 |
|
|
$ |
33,578 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
22,446 |
|
|
$ |
32,152 |
|
|
$ |
38,081 |
|
|
$ |
8,745 |
|
|
$ |
8,320 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
57,379 |
|
|
|
79,781 |
|
|
|
81,908 |
|
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
|
21,035 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
80,495 |
|
|
|
113,071 |
|
|
|
121,137 |
|
|
|
30,068 |
|
|
|
29,708 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
16,516 |
|
|
|
18,297 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
Fully-Funded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
974.2 |
|
|
|
313.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
16,605 |
|
|
|
19,253 |
|
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Runoff
|
|
|
14,771 |
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.5 |
) |
|
|
(127.6 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net premiums earned
|
|
|
109,334 |
|
|
|
136,391 |
|
|
|
138,536 |
|
|
|
34,621 |
|
|
|
35,057 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
9,773 |
|
|
|
14,316 |
|
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
4,544 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(93.4 |
) |
|
|
(125.9 |
) |
|
|
598.1 |
|
Real estate income
|
|
|
57,555 |
|
|
|
67,967 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
(95.6 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
Other income
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
(76.1 |
) |
|
|
3,100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$ |
175,991 |
|
|
$ |
214,657 |
|
|
$ |
155,874 |
|
|
$ |
40,140 |
|
|
$ |
40,028 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
(27.4 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
The following table sets forth the components of the
Companys insurance operations GAAP combined ratio for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Insurance Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses & Loss Adjustment Expenses Ratio
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
68.6 |
% |
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
|
63.2 |
% |
|
Expense Ratio
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Ratio
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
102.7 |
% |
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006
Net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2006
increased 12.5% to $4.1 million, or $0.57 per diluted
share, compared to $3.6 million, or $0.50 per diluted
share, for the same period of 2005.
The 2006 first quarter results included a $2.8 million
charge (which included $764,000 for the Companys
non-subsidiary affiliate, American Safety Risk Retention Group,
Inc. (American Safety RRG)), related to the
settlement of a prior year claim, which primarily arose from our
runoff workers compensation business line. The claim,
which occurred in New York, also triggered coverage on certain
environmental policies due to the state labor laws in New York.
The Company does not expect a recurrence of this type of claim
in the future. The settlement reduced net premiums earned by
$1.8 million due to reinsurance reinstatement premiums, and
increased losses and loss adjustment expenses by
$1.0 million. Net of $1.3 million in minority interest
and taxes, the impact of the settlement of the claim on net
earnings was $1.5 million. The Company previously reported
a charge in the third quarter of 2005 of $2.3 million for
reinsurance reinstatement premiums associated with this claim
after an increase in the case reserves based on the input from
an outside law firm and an independent consultant. The Company
elected to settle the case in late March 2006 for an amount
exceeding the established reserve as a result of additional
information received during a mediation process, creating the
earnings charge in the first quarter. The combined ratio for the
first quarter of 2006 increased to 99.6%, comprised of a loss
ratio of 63.2% and an expense ratio of 36.4%. The claim
settlement increased the loss ratio by 5.7 percentage
points and the expense ratio by 1.8 percentage points. In
the first quarter of 2005, the combined ratio was 94.5%,
comprised of a loss ratio of 60.0% and expense ratio of 34.5%.
Revenues for the first quarter of 2006 totaled
$40.0 million compared to $40.1 million in 2005 as
increased premiums earned, investment income and realized gains
on investments offset the non-recurring real estate income
generated during the first quarter of 2005. Net premiums written
for the first quarter of 2006 decreased 8.7% to
$33.6 million. Included in this decrease were the
reinstatement premiums discussed above, which represented
4.9 percentage points of this decrease. Net premiums earned
increased 1.3% to $35.1 million from the first quarter of
2005 to the first quarter of 2006. Included in this increase
were the reinstatement premiums discussed above, which reduced
the increase in net earned premiums by 5.1 percentage
points. The decrease in net premiums written from the first
quarter of 2005 to the first quarter of 2006 was driven
primarily by decreased premium writings in our construction
business line. The increase in net premiums earned from the
first quarter of 2005 to the first quarter of 2006 was primarily
the result of higher premiums earned in the specialty programs
and environmental business lines.
The Companys book value per share increased to $17.66 at
March 31, 2006 from $17.54 at December 31, 2005 due to
net earnings of $4.1 million, partially offset by an
increase in unrealized losses on investments due to changes in
market interest rates.
32
Environmental. Net premiums earned decreased 4.9% to
$8.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006
compared to $8.7 million for the same period of 2005. Net
premiums written decreased 26.4% to $8.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$11.0 million for the same period of 2005. The decline in
premium writings was due primarily to three factors: (i)
$1.8 million of reinstatement reinsurance premiums
resulting from the settlement of the previously discussed prior
year New York claim; (ii) a decline in the Companys
middle-market business, which includes environmental accounts
with insureds with greater than $3.0 million in annual
revenue, due to increased competition and the overall changing
pricing conditions in the market place; and (iii) an
expected decline in the Companys book of environmental
contractor and consultant premiums in the State of New York as a
result of changes in the underwriting process, which the Company
believes will improve the ultimate profitability of the
environmental business line. The Company expects the decline in
New York business to be complete by the end of the second
quarter of 2006. These decreases were offset, in part, by strong
growth in business submitted through the Companys ProStar
online rating and quoting system (ProStar) and
business from the Companys environmental impairment
liability products, which increased 30.8% and 19.7%,
respectively, compared to the same period of 2005. The Company
intends to focus its efforts on expanding ProStars
capabilities and increasing its market share of insuring
environmental risks of small and medium-sized businesses.
The Company renewed its environmental reinsurance treaty
effective April 1, 2006. The Company maintained the same
reinsurance structure as the expiring treaty but increased its
maximum exposure on a per occurrence basis from $500,000 to
$800,000. The balance of the risk, up to $10.2 million in
excess of the Companys retention, is ceded to unaffiliated
reinsurers.
Construction. Net premiums earned decreased 0.3% to
$21.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 compared to $21.1 million for the same period of 2005.
Net premiums written decreased 8.3% to $20.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$22.2 million for the same period of 2005. The decline in
premium writings was attributable to a reduction in the
Companys renewal retention rate as the Company shifted its
renewal book of commercial construction business toward the
Companys targeted smaller account profile. In addition,
increased competition and a general softening of premium rates
contributed to the decline in premium writings. New business
volume for the quarter remained consistent with 2005 levels as a
result of increased premiums from the Companys geographic
diversification efforts and from the Companys excess
liability product. The Company intends for residential
construction risks to be a focus of its new business efforts as
it believes this area continues to offer modest growth
opportunities in selected geographic areas. Effective
July 1, 2005, the Company discontinued purchasing
reinsurance on the primary general liability portion of this
business line. The Company made this decision after performing a
loss cost and dynamic financial analysis and concluding that its
reinsurance purchases were uneconomical. The Company believes
retaining this exposure will enhance its financial results and
returns on capital.
Surety. Surety is a contract under which an
insurer guarantees certain obligations of a second party to a
third party. The Company is listed as an acceptable surety on
federal bonds, commonly known as a Treasury-listed
or T-listed surety. The Company primarily provides
contract performance and payment bonds to environmental
contractors and general construction contractors in 47 states
and the District of Columbia. Net premiums earned increased
61.2% to $353,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006
compared to $219,000 for the same period of 2005. Net premiums
written increased 76.0% to $440,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to $250,000 for the same period of
2005. These increases were attributable to the Companys
effort to modestly expand its surety business as a supporting
business line due to what the Company believes is the lack of
surety capacity serving this area of the market.
33
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
Specialty Programs. Net premiums earned increased 15.6%
to $5.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 compared to $4.3 million for the same period of 2005.
Net premiums written increased 38.4% to $4.5 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$3.3 million for the same period of 2005. These increases
were attributable to increased retention levels on this business
line. The Company has focused its efforts on increasing its
retention levels on specialty programs, thereby allowing the
Company the opportunity to increase its earnings potential from
underwriting profits, while also earning fee income as the
policy issuer. Despite increases in net premiums earned and net
premiums written, gross premiums written for the quarter
decreased 28.1% to $16.3 million from $22.7 million
for the same period of 2005. The decrease primarily was
attributable to the non-renewal of one professional liability
program in the fourth quarter of 2005 and a reduction in
writings in one of the Companys construction programs due
to a delay in writings that the Company expected for the first
quarter of 2006. The Company added one new program in January
2006, a general liability program coverage for owners of senior
habitational facilities. The Company had nine active programs at
the end of the first quarter of 2006 as compared to twelve at
the end of the first quarter of 2005. See
Business Our Products Alternative
Risk Transfer Specialty Programs for
additional information on the Companys programs.
Fully-Funded. Net premiums earned increased 313.5% to
$368,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared
to $89,000 for the same period of 2005. Net premiums written
increased 41.4% to $188,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to $133,000 for the same period of
2005. Fee income earned in the quarter increased to $492,000
from $160,000 for the same period of 2005. These increases
primarily were attributable to the healthcare and residential
construction industries. The Company expects continued growth in
this business line for the remainder of 2006 in the healthcare
and residential construction industries and new growth in the
product manufacturing industry.
Both net premiums earned and net premiums written decreased to
zero for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$155,000 and negative $35,000 for the same period of 2005,
respectively. The decreases in runoff net premiums earned and
net premiums written were attributable to the Companys
exit from its assumed liability program and workers
compensation business. These businesses were put into runoff in
2004 because they did not meet the Companys profit or
production expectations. See Business Our
Products Runoff for additional information
about the Companys runoff segment.
Net investment income increased 44.0% to $4.5 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 from
$3.2 million for the same period of 2005 due to an increase
in the Companys invested assets and higher investment
yields. Average invested assets increased to $418.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from
$333.5 million for the same period of 2005, reflecting
$64.8 million of cash flows from operations from the second
quarter of 2005 through the first quarter of 2006 and
$24.4 million in net proceeds from the issuance of trust
preferred securities in November 2005. The average pre-tax and
after tax investment yields were 4.3% and 3.6% compared to 3.8%
and 3.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The increase in yields was consistent with
overall market interest rate increases.
Net realized gains and losses from the sale of investments
increased to $363,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2006 from $52,000 for the same period of 2005. Sales of
investments are generally the result of implementing investment
strategies to maximize investment income. In the first quarter
of 2006, the Company rebalanced its common stock investment
portfolio, in accordance with its investment policies, which
resulted in $215,000 of net realized gains. The remainder of net
realized gains were from sales of
34
fixed income securities. See Business
Investments for additional information about the
Companys investment policies.
The Company did not have any real estate income in the first
quarter of 2006 compared to $2.3 million in the first
quarter of 2005. The reduction in real estate income was due to
the substantial completion of the Harbour Village project. The
final condominium units at Harbour Village were sold and closed
in the second quarter of 2005.
The Company does not engage in any real estate activities,
except in connection with the completion of the remainder of the
Harbour Village project, which includes the construction of a
beach club and the management of remaining warranty claims on
closed condominium units. The Company does not expect to engage
in any real estate activities in the future. The earnings and
funds generated from Harbour Village have been invested into the
Companys insurance operations. See
Business Harbour Village Development and
Note 3 to the Companys consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding Harbour Village.
|
|
|
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
The Companys losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio
increased by 3.2 percentage points to 63.2% for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 from 60.0% for the same period of
2005. The increase was attributable to total reserve
strengthening of $688,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to no reserve strengthening for the
same period of 2005. This reserve strengthening primarily was
related to the settlement of the previously discussed prior year
New York claim which required $1.0 million of reserve
strengthening, offset in part by favorable development in the
Companys environmental business line.
Policy acquisition expenses are amounts that are paid to
producers for the production of premium for the Company offset
by the ceding commissions the Company retains from its
reinsurers. For the Companys specialty program business,
fees typically are earned through ceding commissions and have
the effect of lowering its policy acquisition expenses. Policy
acquisition expenses also include amounts paid for premium taxes
to the states where the Company does business on an admitted
basis. Policy acquisition expenses decreased 2.8% to
$6.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006
compared to $7.1 million for the same period of 2005.
Policy acquisition expenses as a percentage of net premiums
earned were 19.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 20.6% for the same period of 2005. This decrease was
primarily the result of the Companys increased retention
on its construction business line.
Interest expense increased to $903,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 from $267,000 for the same period of
2005. The increase was primarily as a result of the issuance of
trust preferred securities in November 2005 in the amount of
$25.0 million, which increased the Companys loans
payable to $37.8 million at March 31, 2006 from
$12.6 million at March 31, 2005. See
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Real estate expenses associated with the Harbour Village project
decreased to $67,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2006 from $2.3 million for the same period of 2005. The
reduction in real estate expenses was due to the substantial
completion of the Harbour Village project. The final condominium
units were sold and closed in the second quarter of 2005.
35
|
|
|
Minority Interest Expense |
Minority interest expense is associated with our non-subsidiary
affiliate, American Safety RRG. In the past, given the
historical loss position of American Safety RRG, a valuation
allowance on its net deferred tax assets had been established.
In the first quarter of 2005, American Safety RRG included in
income the reduction of its $554,000 valuation allowance as
judgment about the realizability of American Safety RRGs
deferred tax assets changed due to its profitability. As a
result, the Companys minority interest expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 was $588,000. In the
first quarter of 2006, American Safety RRG included in expense
$764,000 related to the settlement of the previously discussed
prior year New York claim. Net of taxes, the claim affected
American Safety RRGs net earnings by $505,000. As a
result, minority interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 was a benefit of $472,000.
|
|
|
Payroll and Other Expenses |
Payroll and other expenses increased 30.9% to $7.2 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$5.5 million for the same period of 2005. The change is
primarily due to increased interest costs of $636,000 resulting
from the issuance of trust preferred securities in November
2005, an increase in professional services of $196,000, an
increase in depreciation of $161,000 and increases in payroll
and related expenses of $444,000 due to increased staff.
Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2006 was $16,000, or
less than 1% of pre-tax income, compared to $251,000, or 6.4% of
pre-tax income, for the same period of 2005. The primary reason
for the lower tax rate in the first quarter of 2006 was due to
the settlement of the previously discussed prior year New York
claim, which resulted in a $2.8 million pre-tax charge. The
majority of this settlement was incurred by the Companys
U.S. subsidiaries. For the three months ended March 31,
2006, earnings in Bermuda were 74.2% of the Companys total
pre-tax earnings, and earnings in the U.S. were 25.8% of the
Companys total pre-tax earnings. The Companys
effective tax rate was 0.4% for the first quarter of 2006.
Included in this rate was the impact of the settlement of the
previously discussed prior year New York claim, which reduced
the rate by 11.3 percentage points.
|
|
|
Operations by Geographic Segment |
The Company conducts business in the U.S. and Bermuda.
Significant differences exist in the regulatory environment in
each country, which requires the Company to set forth operations
by those geographic segments. The table below describes the
Companys operations by geographic segment for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
U.S. | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
471,346 |
|
|
|
138,036 |
|
|
|
609,382 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
55,927 |
|
|
|
53,134 |
|
|
|
109,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
U.S. | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
3,055 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
537,187 |
|
|
|
172,388 |
|
|
|
709,575 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
58,348 |
|
|
|
61,359 |
|
|
|
119,707 |
|
Net earnings. Net earnings from Bermuda operations
increased to $3.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 compared to $2.1 million for the same
period of 2005. Net earnings from Bermuda
36
operations increased in 2006 due to improved underwriting
results in the Companys insurance operations. Net earnings
from U.S. operations decreased to $1.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$1.6 million for 2005. This decrease is due to the
settlement of the previously discussed prior year New York claim.
Assets and Equity. Assets from Bermuda operations
increased to $172.4 million at the end of the first quarter
of 2006 compared to $167.4 million at the end of 2005.
Assets from U.S. operations increased to $537.2 million at
the end of the first quarter of 2006 compared to
$529.8 million at the end of 2005. Equity of the Bermuda
operations increased to $61.4 million at the end of the
first quarter of 2006 compared to $59.4 million at the end
of 2005. Equity of the U.S. operations decreased to
$58.3 million at the end of the first quarter of 2006
compared to $59.0 million at the end of 2005.
Year Ended December 31, 2004 compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Net earnings from insurance operations increased to
$13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
from $4.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2004. Net earnings were $14.7 million, or $2.05 per
diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
compared to $14.8 million, or $2.01 per diluted share,
for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The following table sets forth the Companys net earnings
(in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Insurance Operations
|
|
$ |
4,263 |
|
|
$ |
13,618 |
|
Real Estate Operations
|
|
|
7,816 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Other, including realized gains and (losses) from sale of
investments and rescission expenses
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$ |
14,757 |
|
|
$ |
14,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from insurance operations for the year ended
December 31, 2005 increased from 2004 as a result of
improved underwriting results and increased investment income.
The decrease in net earnings from real estate operations was due
to the substantial completion of the Harbour Village project. In
2004, earnings from other items included a $2.6 million
payment received by the Company in settlement of an impaired
note receivable. Total revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2005 decreased 27.4% to $155.9 million
compared to 2004 as a result of lower real estate income. Net
premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2005
increased 1.6% to $138.5 million from 2004 due to increased
production in the Companys core business lines. Investment
income increased 46.5% to $14.3 million compared to 2004 as
a result of increased invested assets of $88.5 million. Net
cash flow from operations decreased to $70.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005 from $89.8 million
for 2004 as a result of increased loss payments, which were
anticipated as a result of the long-tail nature of the risks
that the Company insures, where, with the maturity of the
Companys business, loss payments are expected to continue
to increase.
The Companys book value per share increased 9.4% to $17.54
at December 31, 2005 from $16.04 at December 31, 2004,
primarily due to the Companys continued profitability
during the year, offset by an unrealized loss of
$3.4 million in the Companys investment portfolio.
Environmental. Net premiums earned increased 18.4% to
$38.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to $32.2 million for 2004. Net premiums written
increased 18.4% to $41.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $35.0 million for 2004.
Most of the growth in this business line for 2005 was due to an
increase in online production, as well as an increase in
37
gross premiums of $2.4 million generated as a result of
standard audits that were performed on certain expired policies
in order to adjust estimated premiums to actual premiums. The
Company believes that these increases were offset by a decline
in the State of New York environmental contractor and consultant
premiums as a result of changes implemented in its underwriting
process in the State of New York, which the Company believes
will improve the ultimate profitability of the environmental
business line. The Company continued to experience a slight
decline in premium rates from 2004 primarily in its
middle-market business, which includes environmental accounts
with insureds with greater than $3.0 million in annual
revenue, due to increased competition and the overall changing
pricing conditions in the market place. See
Business Our Market Excess and
Surplus Lines for a description of these changing
conditions. Premium rates on business submitted through ProStar
remained stable.
Construction. Net premiums earned increased 2.7% to
$81.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to $79.8 million for 2004. Net premiums written
increased 0.2% to $78.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $77.9 million for 2004.
During 2005, the Company had $14.3 million of gross
premiums written generated as a result of premium audits.
Premium rates on the residential construction business have
remained stable. The Company, however, started to experience a
slight decline in premium rates on its renewal book of
commercial construction business due to increased competition
and a general softening of pricing in the market place. The
changing market conditions resulted in a decline in the
Companys renewal retention rates and new business volume.
See Business Our Market Excess and
Surplus Lines for a description of these changing
conditions. The Company remained committed to its disciplined
underwriting approach and did not broaden its policy terms and
conditions. Residential construction risks became a focus of the
Companys new business efforts due to its belief that this
area would continue to offer modest growth opportunities in
selected geographic areas. Effective July 1, 2005, the
Company discontinued purchasing reinsurance on the primary
general liability portion of this business line. The Company
made this decision after performing a loss cost and dynamic
financial analysis and concluding that its reinsurance purchases
were uneconomical. The Company believes retaining this exposure
will enhance its financial results and returns on capital.
Surety. Net premiums earned remained stable at
$1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
2004. Net premiums written increased 14.6% to $1.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005 from $1.2 million
for 2004. This increase was attributable to the Companys
efforts to modestly expand its surety business as a supporting
product line to the environmental business line.
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
Specialty Programs. Net premiums earned increased 10.8%
to $18.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to $16.5 million for 2004. Net premiums written
increased 14.1% to $19.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $17.3 million for 2004.
The increase in 2005 was due primarily to premiums written from
three new programs added in late 2004 and the first half of
2005. The Company had nine active programs at the end of 2005 as
compared to twelve at the end of 2004. The Company focused its
efforts on increasing its retention levels on programs, thereby
allowing the Company the opportunity to increase its earnings
potential from underwriting profits. These increased retentions,
in part, drove the increase in premiums earned in 2005.
Fully-Funded. Net premiums earned increased to
$0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
compared to $89,000 for 2004. Net premiums written increased to
$2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
compared to $257,000 for 2004. Fee income earned for the year
ended December 31, 2005 increased to $1.2 million from
$210,000 for 2004.
Net premiums earned decreased to negative $1.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to
$6.7 million for 2004. Net premiums written decreased to
negative $2.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2005 compared to $299,000 for 2004. The decrease in runoff net
premiums earned and net premiums written was attributable to the
Companys exit from its assumed liability program and
38
workers compensation business. These businesses were put
into runoff in 2004 because they did not meet the Companys
profit or production expectations. In addition, in 2005 net
premiums earned and net premiums written decreased due to an
accrual of $2.0 million for a reinstatement premium to
reinstate reinsurance coverage in connection with the previously
discussed prior year New York claim. See
Business Our Products Runoff
for additional information about the Companys runoff
segment.
Net investment income increased 46.5% to $14.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005 from $9.8 million for
2004 due to an increase in the Companys invested assets
and higher investment yields. Average invested assets increased
to $371.3 million as of December 31, 2005 from
$274.7 million as of December 31, 2004, reflecting
approximately $70.4 million in cash flows from operations
and $24.4 million in net proceeds from the issuance of
trust preferred securities in November 2005. The average pre-tax
and after tax investment yields were 3.9% and 3.2% compared to
3.6% and 2.8% for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
Net realized gains and losses from the sale of investments
decreased to a net loss of $54,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from a net gain of $208,000 for 2004. In
2005, the Company sold fixed income securities and common stock
in accordance with its investment policies described under
Business Investments.
Real estate income decreased to $3.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 compared to $68.0 million in
2004. The reduction in real estate income was due to the
substantial completion of the Harbour Village project. The final
condominium units at Harbour Village were sold and closed in the
second quarter of 2005. See Business Harbour
Village Development and Note 3 to the Companys
consolidated financial statements for additional information
regarding Harbour Village.
|
|
|
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Companys
losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio decreased
7.7 percentage points to 60.9% from 68.6% primarily due to
improved underwriting results. The table below sets forth the
reserve strengthening (in thousands) made for prior years by the
Company for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
(754 |
) |
|
Construction
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Runoff
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
14,402 |
|
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve strengthening on the construction business line was
$2.2 million in 2005 compared to $7.7 million in 2004.
The construction business line reserve strengthening in 2005 was
primarily
39
attributable to the commutation of reinsurance contracts with a
former reinsurer, which permitted the reinsurer to discharge all
future obligations to the Company by making a payment to the
Company based on an estimate of those obligations. This
transaction resulted in the Company recognizing losses of
$1.0 million in 2005. During 2005, reserve strengthening on
the runoff segment was $1.1 million compared to
$5.1 million in 2004. In 2005, the reserve strengthening in
this segment included $1.2 million relating to the excess
municipality program offset by reserve redundancies from the
workers compensation business line. See
Business Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense
Reserves and Note 12 to the Companys
consolidated financial statements for additional information
regarding the Companys reserves for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses.
Policy acquisition expenses increased to $28.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005 from $26.5 million
for 2004. Policy acquisition expenses as a percentage of net
premiums earned increased to 20.6% for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from 19.5% for 2004, primarily due to
higher earned premiums in 2004 and lower acquisition expenses in
2004 due to the accrual of profit commissions on reinsurance.
Real estate expenses associated with the Harbour Village project
decreased to $2.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from $55.5 million for 2004. In
2005, the Company received $980,000 as a settlement related to
litigation involving Harbour Village. This receipt was applied
as a reduction to real estate expenses as it had been expensed
previously.
Payroll expenses increased to $12.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 from $10.3 million for 2004.
This increase reflected an accrual for bonuses based on the
Companys performance and normal salary increases.
Other expenses increased to $13.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 from $9.6 million for 2004. In
2004, the Company collected $2.6 million as final
settlement of a notes receivable, which was applied as a
reduction to 2004 other expenses. Absent this $2.6 million
receipt, other expenses increased $1.0 million in 2005
primarily due to the establishment of a $1.3 million
reinsurance recoverable allowance, which was reflected in the
Companys insurance operations results.
In connection with the Companys acquisition in 2000 of a
brokerage firm and a related entity, the Company recorded a
benefit of $1.4 million in 2005 due to the reversal of an
accrual. This compared to a net benefit of $230,000 in 2004
related to the same dispute as a result of a settlement of
litigation. See Legal Proceedings for
additional information.
The effective tax rate decreased to 8.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2005 from 20.0% for 2004. This decrease was
due primarily to the reversal of a deferred tax asset reserve of
American Safety RRG of $555,000. Absent this adjustment, the
effective tax rate would have been 12.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2005. In addition, the effective tax rate was
lower due to a decrease in real estate earnings and lower
taxable income of the Companys U.S. insurance
subsidiaries.
40
|
|
|
Operations by Geographic Segment |
The Company conducts business in the U.S. and Bermuda.
Significant differences exist in the regulatory environment in
each country, which requires the Company to set forth operations
by those geographic segments. The table below describes the
Companys operations by geographic segments for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
U.S. | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
10,260 |
|
|
|
14,656 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
529,768 |
|
|
|
167,367 |
|
|
|
697,135 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
59,002 |
|
|
|
59,433 |
|
|
|
118,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
U.S. |
|
Bermuda |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
9,214 |
|
|
|
14,757 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
449,322 |
|
|
|
134,838 |
|
|
|
584,160 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
56,126 |
|
|
|
52,654 |
|
|
|
108,780 |
|
Net earnings. Net earnings from Bermuda operations
increased to $10.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 compared to $9.2 million for 2004.
Net earnings from Bermuda operations increased in 2005 due to
improved underwriting results in the Companys insurance
operations. Net earnings from U.S. operations decreased to
$4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
compared to $5.5 million for 2004. This decrease was due to
lower real estate income offset by improved insurance
operations. U.S. insurance earnings increased by
$6.5 million to $4.2 million at December 31, 2005
compared to a loss of $2.3 million at December 31,
2004. Real estate income decreased to $209,000 at
December 31, 2005 compared to $7.8 million for the
same period of 2004.
Assets. Assets from Bermuda operations increased to
$167.4 million at the end of 2005 compared to
$134.8 million at the end of 2004. This increase resulted
from an increase in premium writings assumed from growing
U.S. operations. Assets from U.S. operations at the
end of 2005 increased to $529.7 million, compared to
$449.3 million at the end of 2004. This increase resulted
from the Company issuing trust preferred securities in 2005
raising approximately $24.4 million and the growth in the
Companys core business lines offset by a decrease in real
estate assets as the Harbour Village project was substantially
complete.
Equity. Equity of the Bermuda operations increased to
$59.4 million at the end of 2005 compared to
$52.6 million at the end of 2004. This increase was largely
due to higher net income offset by a stock repurchase during the
second quarter of 2005 and an increase in the net unrealized
losses on the Companys investment portfolio. Equity of the
U.S. operations increased to $59.0 million at the end
of 2005 compared to $56.1 million at the end of 2004. This
increase was a result of higher net income offset by an increase
in net unrealized losses on the Companys investment
portfolio.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Net earnings from insurance operations decreased to
$4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net
earnings increased to $14.8 million, or $2.01 per
diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$7.4 million, or $1.42 per diluted share, for the year
ended December 31, 2003.
41
The following table sets forth the Companys net earnings
(in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Insurance Operations
|
|
$ |
7,076 |
|
|
$ |
4,263 |
|
Real Estate Operations
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
7,816 |
|
Other, including realized gains and (losses) from sale of
investments and rescission expenses
|
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings
|
|
$ |
7,414 |
|
|
$ |
14,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from insurance operations for the year ended
December 31, 2004 included reserve strengthening of
$14.4 million relating to prior years. The increase in net
earnings from real estate operations was due to closings of
units at Harbour Village with higher profit margins. Earnings
from other items included a $2.6 million payment received
by the Company in settlement of an impaired note receivable that
was written off in the fourth quarter of 2003. Total revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased 22.0% to
$214.7 million compared to 2003 as a result of increased
net premiums earned and real estate and investment income. Net
premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2004
increased 24.8% to $136.4 million from 2003 due to
increased production in the Companys core business lines.
Net investment income increased 68.5% to $9.8 million
compared to 2003 as a result of an increase in invested assets
of $104.6 million, excluding real estate. Net cash flow
from operations increased to $89.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $80.2 million for 2003.
The Companys book value per share increased 16.2% to
$16.04 at December 31, 2004 from $13.80 at
December 31, 2003, primarily due to the Companys net
earnings during the year.
Environmental. Net premiums earned increased 43.2% to
$32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $22.4 million for 2003. Net premiums written
increased 28.6% to $35.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $27.2 million for 2003.
This growth was attributable primarily to growth in premiums
originated through ProStar as well as increased business written
in the Companys middle-market offices, which target
environmental accounts of insureds with greater than
$3.0 million in annual revenue. ProStar was introduced by
the Company in 2001 as part of its strategy to grow the
environmental business line. Gross premiums written through
ProStar were $12.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Construction. Net premiums earned increased 39.0% to
$79.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $57.4 million for 2003. Net premiums written
increased 5.9% to $77.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $73.6 million for 2003.
The Company continued to capitalize on market conditions,
specifically, the lack of insurance capacity for certain
construction risks. In addition, the Company introduced a new
excess general liability coverage product in the second quarter
of 2004 to meet the market need for higher limits of liability
above the Companys primary policies.
Surety. Net premiums earned increased 69.8% to
$1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$670,000 for 2003. Net premiums written increased 59.9% to
$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$734,000 for 2003. This increase was attributable to the
Companys efforts to modestly expand its surety business as
a supporting product line to the environmental business line. In
addition, in order to capitalize on underwriting opportunities
in this business line, the Company entered into a quota share
reinsurance treaty during the second quarter of 2004. This
treaty allowed the Company to cede half of the exposures in an
amount up to $2 million per bond to the reinsurer, which
allowed more
42
premiums to be written. This reinsurance agreement had the
effect of lowering the Companys premiums and losses in
this business line by 50%.
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
Specialty Programs. Net premiums earned increased 17.4%
to $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $14.1 million for 2003. Net premiums written
increased 13.9% to $17.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $15.2 million for 2003.
Prior to 2002, the Company had not retained significant portions
of risk in this business line. In 2003, the Company expanded its
risk position in certain programs. These increased retentions
drove the increase in premiums earned. The Company also earned
fee income on certain specialty program business that it wrote.
The Company had twelve active programs at the end of 2004 and at
the end of 2003.
Fully-Funded. Net premiums earned increased to $89,000
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to $0 for
2003. Net premiums written increased to $257,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as compared to $0 for 2003. Fee
income earned for the year ended December 31, 2004
increased to $210,000 from $62,000 for 2003.
Net premiums earned decreased 54.5% to $6.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $14.8 million
for 2003. Net premiums written decreased 97.9% to $299,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to
$14.8 million for 2003. The decrease in runoff net premiums
earned was attributable to the Companys exit from specific
business lines that did not meet its profit or production
expectations, such as workers compensation.
Net investment income increased 68.5% to $9.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 from $5.8 million for
2003 due to an increase in the Companys invested assets
and higher investment yields. Average invested assets increased
to $274.7 million as of December 31, 2004 from
$167.2 million as of December 31, 2003. The average
pre-tax and after tax investment yields were 3.6% and 2.8%
compared to 3.5% and 2.7% for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
Net realized gains from the sale of investments decreased to
$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from
$3.1 million for 2003. This decrease was due to the
Companys decision to realize gains on fixed income
securities in 2003.
Real estate income increased to $68.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to $57.6 million for
2003. This revenue was generated from closings of condominium
units and boat slips at the Companys Harbour Village
project. The Company did not recognize revenue until a closing
occurred and title passed to the buyer. The following chart
shows the number of condominium units and boat slips that were
closed each year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Condominium Units
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Boat Slips
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
The Company had an increase in real estate income in 2004 as
compared to 2003 resulting from increased closings of
condominium units and higher priced unit closings at the Harbour
Village project. The average sales price of condominiums closed
in 2004 was $297,000 as compared to $275,000 in 2003.
|
|
|
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Companys
losses and loss adjustment expenses ratio increased
8.4 percentage points to 68.6% from 60.2%, primarily due to
reserve strengthening for prior years. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, reserve strengthening for prior years
increased to $14.4 million from $5.2 million for 2003.
The table below sets forth the reserve strengthening (in
thousands) made for prior years by the Company for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
14,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, reserve strengthening for the construction business
line was $7.7 million. Of this amount, $4.7 million
was attributable to certain New York contractor risks written in
2001. Exposure to New York contractor risks was significantly
reduced during 2002 and 2003. In response to this reserve
strengthening and managements concern that existing
reserves for this business line might be inadequate, the Company
commenced an actuarial reserve evaluation of this business line.
Following completion of this evaluation, the Company changed
actuarial reserving methodologies and recorded $3.0 million
of additional reserves for the construction line during the
third quarter of 2004. During 2004, reserve strengthening for
the runoff segment was $5.1 million. Of this amount
$1.6 million related to the Companys excess
municipality program, $2.9 million related to increases in
workers compensation reserves and $550,000 related to
increases in commercial lines reserves.
Policy acquisition expenses increased to $26.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 from $21.8 million
for 2003 due to higher net premium volume. Policy acquisition
expenses as a function of net premiums earned decreased to 19.5%
for the year ended December 31, 2004 from 20.0% for 2003
primarily due to a shift in business mix toward business with
lower acquisition costs.
Real estate expenses associated with the Harbour Village project
increased to $55.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $54.0 million for 2003. The
majority of real estate expenses, including construction costs,
capitalized interest and commissions were recognized at the same
time as revenue is recognized. General and administrative
expenses were expensed as incurred.
44
|
|
|
Payroll and Other Expenses |
Payroll and other expenses decreased to $19.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 from $23.7 million
for 2003. Payroll expenses increased to $10.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 from $9.0 million for
2003 due to additional employees. Other expenses in 2004
included a $2.6 million recovery related to impaired notes
receivable, and other expenses in 2003 included a
$3.9 million impairment charge.
Rescission expenses decreased to a benefit of $230,000 in 2004
from an expense of $255,000 in 2003. The benefit in 2004
included a $1.8 million payment received in settlement of
professional liability claims in a rescission matter relating to
the Companys acquisition of a brokerage firm and a related
entity. Also included in 2004 are $1.4 million of
additional expenses as a result of adverse court rulings in
March 2005 in connection with the same dispute. See
Legal Proceedings for additional
information.
The effective tax rate decreased to 20.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from 26.5% for 2003. This decrease was
the result of lower taxable income in the Companys
U.S. subsidiaries during 2004.
|
|
|
Operations by Geographic Segment |
The Company conducts business in the U.S. and Bermuda.
Significant differences exist in the regulatory environment in
each country, which requires the Company to set forth operations
by those geographic segments. The table below describes the
Companys operations by geographic segment for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
U.S. |
|
Bermuda |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,696 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
9,214 |
|
|
|
14,757 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
449,322 |
|
|
|
134,838 |
|
|
|
584,160 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
56,126 |
|
|
|
52,654 |
|
|
|
108,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
U.S. |
|
Bermuda |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
|
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
410,177 |
|
|
|
104,083 |
|
|
|
514,260 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
50,445 |
|
|
|
44,898 |
|
|
|
95,343 |
|
Net earnings. Net earnings from Bermuda operations
increased to $9.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $1.6 million for 2003.
This increase was attributable to the Company collecting
$2.6 million as final settlement of a note receivable for
which an allowance was established in 2003 and the remainder of
the increase was due to growth in insurance operations. Net
earnings from U.S. operations decreased to
$5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $5.8 million in 2003. The overall decrease in
net earnings from U.S. operations primarily resulted from a
decrease in insurance operations earnings due to reserve
strengthening offset by an increase in real estate income.
U.S. insurance earnings decreased to a loss of
$2.3 million at December 31, 2004 compared to a gain
of $3.6 million at December 31, 2003. Real estate
income increased to $7.8 million at December 31, 2004
compared to $2.2 million for the same period of 2003.
Assets. Assets from Bermuda operations increased to
$134.8 million at the end of 2004 compared to
$104.1 million at the end of 2003. This increase was a
result of an increase in premium writings assumed from growing
U.S. operations. Assets from U.S. operations at the
end of 2004 increased to $449.3 million, compared to
$410.2 million at the end of 2003. This change was a result
of increased premium writings as
45
the Company capitalized on favorable market conditions offset by
a decrease in real estate assets at the end of 2004. Real estate
assets decreased at the end of 2004 as the Harbour Village
project neared completion.
Equity. Equity of the Bermuda operations increased to
$52.6 million at the end of 2004 compared to
$44.9 million at the end of 2003. This increase was due to
higher net income and increased net unrealized gains in the
Companys investment portfolio offset by a stock repurchase
during the third quarter of 2004. Equity of the
U.S. operations increased to $56.1 million at the end
of 2004 compared to $50.4 million at the end of 2003. This
increase was a result of higher net income and increased net
unrealized gains in the Companys investment portfolio.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We meet our cash requirements and finance our growth principally
through cash flows generated from operations. From 2000 until
2004, we operated in a hardening market with increased insurance
premium rates for our general liability coverages and increased
fees for program business opportunities. During 2004 and 2005
and the first quarter of 2006, we began to experience a leveling
of premium rates due to the entrance of new insurance
competitors and overall market conditions. Our primary sources
of short-term cash flow are premium writings and investment
income. Short-term cash requirements relate to claims payments,
reinsurance premiums, commissions, salaries, employee benefits,
real estate development expenses and other operating expenses.
Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of
settlements of unpaid claims, our future liquidity requirements
may vary; therefore, we have structured our investment portfolio
maturities to help mitigate the variations in those factors. We
believe our current cash flows are sufficient for the short-term
needs of our current business and our invested assets are
sufficient for the long-term needs of our insurance business.
Net cash provided from operations was $12.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, and $17.8 million
for the same period of 2005. This decrease was primarily caused
by increased loss payments, which increased to
$14.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 from $11.7 million for the same period of 2005.
Net cash provided from operations was $70.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005, $89.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and $80.2 million for the year ended December
31, 2003. The decrease in cash flow from operations between 2005
and 2004 was primarily caused by increased loss payments, which
increased to $46.9 million from $20.5 million. During
2004, we received $2.6 million in final settlement of
previously fully reserved notes receivable and also received
$1.8 million from the settlement of professional liability
claims in a rescission matter relating to our acquisition of a
brokerage firm and a related entity. See Legal
Proceedings for additional information.
Our ability to pay future dividends to shareholders will depend,
to a significant degree, on the ability of our subsidiaries to
generate earnings from which to pay dividends. The jurisdictions
in which we and our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are
domiciled place limitations on the amount of dividends or other
distributions payable by insurance companies in order to protect
the solvency of insurers. Given our growth and the capital
requirements associated with that growth, we do not anticipate
paying dividends on the Common Shares in the near future.
We substantially completed the Harbour Village project in 2005.
The estimated completion cost for the remainder of Harbour
Village is approximately $1.4 million and represents
amounts needed to complete construction of a beach club and
manage remaining warranty claims on closed condominium units. An
accrual of this amount has been established. Management believes
that cash on hand will meet the remaining liquidity needs of
Harbour Village.
To further provide for the capital requirements associated with
our growth strategy, we entered into the following arrangements.
In May 2003, in conjunction with American Safety Capital Trust,
a non-consolidated, 100%-owned subsidiary, we issued a
30-year trust preferred
obligation in the amount of $8.0 million. This obligation
bears interest at the three-month London Interbank Offer Rate
(LIBOR)
46
plus 4.2%, is payable on a quarterly basis and may be called
solely at our option after five years. In order to hedge this
obligation for the first five years, we entered into an interest
rate swap with an interest rate of 7.1% for five years. In
September 2003, in conjunction with American Safety Capital
Trust II, a non-consolidated, 100%-owned subsidiary, we
issued a 30-year trust
preferred obligation in the amount of $5.0 million. This
obligation bears interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.95%, is
payable on a quarterly basis and may be called solely at our
option after five years. In order to hedge this obligation for
the first five years, we entered into an interest rate swap with
an interest rate of 7.6% for five years. In November 2003, we
completed a secondary offering of over 2.1 million common
shares whereby we received $27.2 million of additional
capital. Additionally, in November 2005, in conjunction with
American Safety Capital Trust III, we issued a
30-year trust preferred
obligation in the amount of $25.0 million. This obligation
bears a fixed interest rate of 8.31% for the first five years,
and a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.4% thereafter.
At the current time, we do not anticipate entering into an
interest rate swap with respect to this issuance. Interest is
payable on a quarterly basis and the securities may be called
solely at our option after five years.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations (in thousands) as of
December 31, 2005 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More | |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3-5 | |
|
Than 5 | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
37,810 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,810 |
|
Interest(1)
|
|
|
95,062 |
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
6,155 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
|
|
79,410 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
$ |
134,134 |
|
|
$ |
3,687 |
|
|
$ |
6,745 |
|
|
$ |
6,482 |
|
|
$ |
117,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The above table includes all interest payments through the
expiration of interest rate swaps as discussed in Note 8 to
our consolidated financial statements. At that time we may
redeem the debt or continue with variable interest payments. All
amounts are reflected based on final maturity dates. Variable
rate interest obligations are estimated based on current
interest rates. Fixed rates include, where applicable, the
effects of interest rate derivatives employed to manage interest
rate risk. |
For these purposes, routine purchase of services, including
insurance, that are expected to be used in the ordinary course
of our business have been excluded. More information about our
contractual obligations may be found in Note 8 to our
consolidated financial statements. Our contractual obligations
have not changed materially since December 31, 2005.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting policies described below are those we consider
critical in preparing our financial statements. These policies
include significant estimates made by management using
information available at the time the estimates are made.
However, as described below, these estimates could change
materially if different information or assumptions were used.
Investments. We routinely review our investments that
have experienced declines in fair value to determine if the
decline is other than temporary. These reviews are performed
with consideration of the facts and circumstances of an issuer
in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59,
Accounting for Non-Current Marketable Equity Securities;
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities; and related guidance. The identification of
distressed investments, and the
47
assessment of whether a decline is other than temporary, involve
significant management judgment and require evaluation of
factors including but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage decline in value and the length of time during which
the decline has occurred; |
|
|
|
Recoverability of principal and interest; |
|
|
|
Market conditions; |
|
|
|
Ability to hold the investment to maturity; |
|
|
|
A pattern of continuing operating losses of the issuer; |
|
|
|
Rating agency actions that affect the issuers credit
status; |
|
|
|
Adverse changes in the issuers availability of production
resources, revenue sources, technological conditions; and |
|
|
|
Adverse changes in the issuers economic, regulatory or
political environment. |
Reserves. Certain of our insurance policies and
reinsurance assumed, including general and pollution liability
policies covering environmental remediation, construction, and
workers compensation risks, may be subject to claims
brought years after an incident has occurred or the policy
period has ended. Claims made policies provide coverage for
claims that are reported during the policy period. Occurrence
form policies provide coverage for claims that occur during the
policy period regardless of when they are reported. We are
required by our regulators to maintain reserves to cover the
unpaid portion of our ultimate liability for losses and loss
adjustment expenses with respect to (i) reported claims and
(ii) IBNR claims. A full actuarial analysis is performed to
estimate all of our unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
under the terms of our contracts and agreements. In evaluating
whether the reserves are reasonable for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses, it is necessary to project payments for
future losses and loss adjustment expenses. It is probable that
the actual future losses and loss adjustment expenses will not
develop exactly as projected and may, in fact, vary
significantly from the projections. If the net loss reserves
were to increase by 5% this would reduce pre-tax income by
$12.2 million. If the net loss reserves were to decrease by
5% this would increase pre-tax income by $12.2 million.
With respect to reported claims, reserves are established on a
case-by-case basis. The reserve amounts on each reported claim
are determined by taking into account the circumstances
surrounding each claim and policy provisions relating to the
type of loss. Loss reserves are reviewed on a regular basis, and
as new information becomes available, appropriate adjustments
are made to reserves.
Our reserve methodology does not differ among business lines,
except with respect to our construction business line as
described below. In establishing reserves, we employ several
methods in determining our ultimate losses: (i) the
expected loss ratio method; (ii) the loss development
method based on paid and reported losses; and (iii) the
Bornhuetter-Ferguson method based on expected loss ratios, paid
losses and reported losses. The expected loss ratio method
incorporates industry expected losses which are adjusted for our
historical loss experience. The loss development method relies
on industry payment and reporting patterns to develop our
estimated losses. The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method is a
combination of the other two methods, using expected loss ratios
to produce expected losses, then applying loss payment and
reporting patterns to our expected losses to produce our
expected IBNR losses. We review the ultimate projections from
all three methods and, based on the merits of each method,
determine our estimated ultimate losses. In response to our
reserve strengthening in the first two quarters of 2004 in our
construction business line and managements concern that
existing reserves for this line of business might be inadequate,
we commenced an actuarial reserve evaluation. This evaluation
analyzed reserves by specific risk categories within the
construction business line, such as general liability for
building owners and California contractors in addition to
analyzing by a single risk category for the entire construction
business line. The results of the specific risk analysis were
then compared to the single risk analysis in determining the
final carried reserves. The establishment of appropriate loss
reserves is an inherently uncertain process, and there can be no
assurance our ultimate liabilities will not materially exceed our
48
reserves. For more information on our reserves, see
Business Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense
Reserves.
Reinsurance. Ceded unearned premiums and reinsurance
balances recoverable on paid and unpaid losses and settlement
expenses are reported separately as assets, instead of being
netted with the related liabilities, because reinsurance does
not relieve us of our legal liability to our policyholders. We
continuously monitor the financial condition of our reinsurers.
Our policy is to periodically charge to earnings, in the form of
an allowance, as necessary, an estimate of unrecoverable amounts
from troubled or insolvent reinsurers. We believe that current
reserve levels for uncollectible reinsurance are sufficient to
cover our exposures.
Policy Acquisition Costs. We defer commissions and
premium taxes that are related to the acquisition of insurance
contracts. These costs are capitalized and charged to expense in
proportion to premium revenue recognized. The method followed in
computing deferred policy acquisition costs limits the amount of
these deferred costs to their estimated realizable value. This
method would also take into account the premiums to be earned
and anticipated losses and settlement expenses, as well as
certain other costs expected to be incurred as the premiums are
earned. Judgments as to the ultimate recoverability of deferred
costs are highly dependent upon estimated future loss costs
associated with the premiums written.
Deferred Income Taxes. We are required to establish a
valuation allowance for the portion of any deferred tax asset
that we believe will not be realized. The majority of our
deferred tax assets associated with the Harbour Village project
were realized in 2005. The majority of our deferred taxes
associated with our premium writings will be realized over the
policy period and payout of related claims. We believe it is
more likely than not that we will realize the full benefit of
our deferred tax assets; therefore no valuation allowance has
been established. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial
statements for additional information on deferred tax assets.
Recognition of Premium Income. General liability premiums
are estimated based upon the annual revenues of the underlying
insureds. Additional or return premiums are recognized for
differences between provisional premiums billed and estimated
ultimate general liability premiums due when the final audit is
complete after the policy has expired. General liability,
surety, commercial auto, other commercial lines and
workers compensation premiums are recorded ratably over
the policy period with unearned premium calculated on a pro rata
basis over the lives of the underlying coverages.
Income Taxes
We are incorporated under the laws of Bermuda and, under current
Bermuda law, are not obligated to pay any taxes in Bermuda based
upon income or capital gains. We have received an undertaking
from the Minister of Finance in Bermuda pursuant to the
provisions of the Tax Protection Act, which exempts us and our
shareholders, other than shareholders ordinarily resident in
Bermuda, from any Bermuda taxes computed on profits, income or
any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the
nature of estate, duty or inheritance until March 28, 2016.
Exclusive of our U.S. subsidiaries, we do not consider
ourselves to be engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. and
accordingly do not expect to be subject to direct
U.S. income taxation. Our U.S. subsidiaries are
subject to taxation in the U.S.
Impact of Inflation
Property and casualty insurance premiums are established before
the amounts of losses and loss adjustment expenses are known and
therefore before the extent by which inflation may affect these
expenses is known. Consequently, we attempt, in establishing our
premiums, to anticipate the potential impact of inflation.
However, for competitive and regulatory reasons, we may be
limited in raising premiums consistent with anticipated
inflation, in which event we, rather than our insureds, would
absorb inflation costs. Inflation also affects the rate of
investment return on our investment portfolio with a
corresponding effect on our investment income.
49
Combined Ratio
The combined ratio of an insurance company measures only the
underwriting results of insurance operations and not the
profitability of the overall company. Our reported combined
ratio for our insurance operations may not provide an accurate
indication of our overall profitability. For instance, depending
on our mix of business, the combined ratio may fluctuate from
time to time and may not reflect the overall profitability of
our insurance operations. Our reported combined ratio excludes
certain holding company expenses such as interest expense as
well as real estate and rescission expenses.
Variable Interest Entities (VIE)
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46). This interpretation requires the
consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a
majority of the entitys expected losses, receives a
majority of the expected residual gains or both, as a result of
ownership, contractual or other financial interests in the
entity. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised version of
FIN 46, FIN 46(R), which finalized the accounting
guidance for VIEs. As a result of adopting FIN 46(R), we
consolidated our non-subsidiary affiliate American Safety RRG,
and deconsolidated our trust subsidiaries, American Safety
Capital Trust, American Safety Capital Trust II and
American Safety Capital Trust III.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has guaranteed a $2.0 million letter of credit
to the State of Vermont on behalf of American Safety RRG, its
non-subsidiary affiliate. This letter of credit served as
initial capitalization of American Safety RRG and may be drawn
upon in the event of the insolvency of American Safety RRG.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of economic losses due to adverse
changes in the estimated fair value of a financial instrument as
the result of changes in equity prices, interest rates, foreign
exchange rates or commodity prices. Our consolidated balance
sheets include assets whose estimated fair values are subject to
market risk. The primary market risks to us are interest rate
and credit risk associated with our investments. We have no
direct commodity or foreign exchange risk as of March 31,
2006. The estimated fair value of our investment portfolio at
December 31, 2005 was $415.5 million, of which 93.9%
was invested in fixed maturities and short-term investments and
6.1% was invested in equities. The estimated fair value of our
investment portfolio at March 31, 2006 was
$421.5 million, of which 93.0% was invested in fixed
maturities and short-term investments and 7.0% was invested in
equities.
Interest Rate Risk. Our fixed rate holdings are invested
predominantly in high quality corporate, government and
municipal bonds with relatively short durations. The fixed rate
portfolio is exposed to interest rate fluctuations; assuming all
other factors remain constant, as interest rates rise, their
fair values decline and as interest rates fall, their fair
values rise. The changes in the fair market value of the fixed
rate portfolio are presented as a component of
shareholders equity in accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of taxes.
We work to manage the impact of interest rate fluctuations on
our fixed rate portfolio. The effective duration of the fixed
rate portfolio is managed with consideration given to the
estimated payout timing of our liabilities. We have investment
policies which limit the maximum duration and maturity of
individual securities within the portfolio and set target levels
for average duration and maturity of the entire portfolio. For
additional information on our investments and investment
policies, see Business Investments.
50
The table below summarizes our interest rate risk and shows the
effect of hypothetical changes in interest rates as of
March 31, 2006. The selected hypothetical changes do not
indicate what would be the potential best or worst case
scenarios (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Hypothetical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Hypothetical |
|
After |
|
Increase |
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
Change in Interest |
|
Hypothetical |
|
(Decrease) in |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Rate (bp=basis |
|
Change in |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
2006 |
|
points) |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Maturity Investments
|
|
$ |
391,980 |
|
|
|
200bp decrease |
|
|
$ |
421,814 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
(including short-term investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100bp decrease |
|
|
|
407,423 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100bp increase |
|
|
|
375,953 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200bp increase |
|
|
|
360,190 |
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
Interest rate risk related to our loans payable to American
Safety Capital Trust and American Safety Capital Trust II,
two of our non-consolidated 100% owned subsidiaries, is hedged
for the first five years of the debt obligations through the use
of interest rate swaps. We have not hedged the interest rate
risk related to our loan payable to American Safety Capital
Trust III.
Credit Risk. We invest primarily in the debt securities
markets, which exposes us to credit risk. Credit risk is a
consequence of extending credit and/or carrying investment
positions. We require that all securities be rated investment
grade at the time of purchase. We use specific criteria to judge
the credit quality and liquidity of our investments and use a
variety of credit rating services to monitor these criteria. For
additional information on our investments and our investment
criteria, see Business Investments.
Legal Proceedings
We, through our subsidiaries, are routinely a party to pending
or threatened litigation or arbitration disputes in the normal
course of our business. Based upon information presently
available, in view of legal and other defenses available to our
subsidiaries, management does not believe that any pending or
threatened litigation or arbitration disputes will have any
material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating
results, except for the following matters.
Assumed Reinsurance Litigation. We are a defendant in
several cases, liquidation actions and reinsurance claims,
collectively identified as the National Warranty
issue. American Safety Re was an excess of loss reinsurer
through a reinsurance treaty with National Warranty Risk
Retention Group (National Warranty) that, in turn,
provided insurance coverage to automobile dealerships and other
providers that became obligors pursuant to extended automobile
warranty contracts they sold to consumers. National Warranty
filed for liquidation in the Cayman Islands (the location of its
legal creation). This liquidation had a cascading effect,
including the subsequent filing of bankruptcy by various
obligors of vehicle service contracts insured by National
Warranty. As a result, there are potentially over one million
vehicle service contracts that are not being honored by the
obligors.
The liquidators of National Warranty have made claims in excess
of $25.0 million pursuant to two reinsurance contracts
issued by American Safety Re to National Warranty in 2002 and
2003. In addition, purchasers of vehicle service contracts have
made claims against American Safety Re, including a claim by one
purchaser group for $10.0 million. This case has been
certified as a class action, although we are appealing that
determination. Lastly, claims have been made by sellers/obligors
of the vehicle service contracts who were insured by National
Warranty. There are nine cases against us and other professional
services providers, including other reinsurers, relating to
National Warranty, with claims in excess of $2.6 million.
All of these claims are based on fraud and/or theories of
contractual violations. We continue to believe that American
Safety Re has valid defenses to the claims including, among
others, that it had commuted its obligations under reinsurance
treaties, its liability is limited to the amount of coverage
provided under the policies, which varies based on premium and
loss ratios, and that most of the claimants cannot make claims
directly against it. We have an accrual in place that we believe
will be sufficient to satisfy any potential liability relating
to the outcome of these matters.
51
Griggs et al. v. American Safety Reinsurance, Ltd. et
al., Case No 2003-31509, Circuit Court, Seventh Judicial
District, Volusia County, Florida. Seven plaintiffs filed suit
against us and three of our subsidiaries seeking to recover a
$2.1 million loan made by the plaintiffs in 1986 to Ponce
Marina, Inc., the former owner of the Harbour Village property.
The plaintiffs claimed that we were responsible for the
repayment of the loan, with interest. The plaintiffs propounded
four theories of liability and the court granted judgment for us
on three of the theories. However, the court entered judgment on
August 10, 2005 against us for approximately
$3.4 million, which includes interest, on the remaining
theory. The court held that we, as a condition of our loan,
required Ponce Marina, Inc. to demand that the plaintiffs enter
into an agreement with Ponce Marina, Inc., to the detriment of
their loans and to our benefit, and thus, we had entered into a
quasi-contract with the plaintiffs to repay their loan with
interest.
We filed an appeal and our appelate brief in December 2005. The
plaintiffs filed their appelate brief in May 2006. Based on
the merits of the case and the likelihood of ultimate payment,
we have not established an accrual for the decision.
Sizemore v. American Safety Insurance Services, Inc. et
al., Case No 2005-31704, Circuit Court, Seventh Judicial
District, Volusia County, Florida. ASI Services, its parents and
a number of its affiliates are defendants in a suit brought by
an individual who contends that defendants are liable to him for
a debt owed to him by Ponce Marina, Inc. in the amount of
$400,000 plus interest and costs. The plaintiff also intends to
seek class certification on behalf of himself and 21 other
unnamed plaintiffs for the case on these claims in excess of
$1.7 million plus interest and costs. On January 27,
2006, the trial court dismissed the case. The plaintiff was
permitted to file an amended complaint on or before
March 6, 2006. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on
March 7, 2006, alleging various theories of recovery, which
were also alleged in the Griggs case. On May 4,
2006, the trial court dismissed the case and gave the plaintiffs
20 days to file an amended complaint. We continue to
vigorously defend this case, as we believe that the case is
without merit. Based on the merits of the case and the
likelihood of ultimate payment, we have not established an
accrual for the decision.
Baber v. Boroweic v. American Safety Casualty
Insurance Company. This case arose out of a malpractice
claim brought by the Baber family in 2003 against two lawyers,
the Boroweics. During the adjustment of this claim, American
Safety Casualty issued a reservation of rights letter, denied
the claim based on a coverage issue, rejected a policy limits
demand and intervened into the underlying suit. The Babers and
Boroweics eventually entered into a Morris Agreement
wherein the Babers agreed not to pursue any judgment against the
Boroweics. Rather, the Boroweics assigned their bad faith rights
against American Safety Casualty to the Babers. The court found
this to be reasonable and also found that the Babers, as a
result of the accident, had incurred $11.0 million in
damages. The Babers sued American Safety Casualty for bad faith.
This case was settled in December 2005 for $5.5 million.
We anticipate $1.3 million of the loss to be our ultimate
exposure after recovery from our reinsurers, which was recorded
in 2005.
Acquisition Rescission Litigation. In April 2000, we
filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia for damages and, alternatively, to rescind
the stock purchase of a Michigan insurance agency and two
related insurance companies specializing in insurance program
business based upon the sellers breach of the
representations and warranties made in the definitive agreements
concerning the business affairs and financial condition of the
acquired companies. This case and related litigation were
settled in December 2005 with the release of 109,716 shares
of escrowed stock and cash of $355,000 payable to the various
defendants.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure
On July 26, 2004 the Company dismissed KPMG LLP
(KPMG) as the principal accountant to audit the
Companys financial statements. The decision to change
accountants was approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of the Company.
52
KPMGs audit report on the Companys consolidated
financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 did not contain an adverse opinion or
disclaimer of opinion nor was that report qualified or modified
as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
In connection with the audit of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 and the subsequent interim period through
July 26, 2004, there were no disagreements with KPMG on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure or auditing scope of procedure that, if not
resolved to KPMGs satisfaction, would have caused KPMG to
make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in
connection with its report. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003, and the subsequent interim period, the
Company has had no reportable events as defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act).
BDO Seidman, LLP was engaged by the Company as its new principal
accountants to audit the Companys financial statements,
and began such engagement in auditing the Companys
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.
53
BUSINESS
Who We Are
We are a specialty insurance company that provides customized
insurance products and solutions to small and medium-sized
businesses in industries that we believe are underserved by the
standard insurance market. For twenty years, we have developed
specialized insurance coverages and alternative risk transfer
products not generally available to our customers in the
standard insurance market because of the unique characteristics
of the risks involved and the associated needs of the insureds.
We specialize in underwriting these products for insureds with
environmental risks and construction risks as well as in
developing programs for other specialty classes of risks.
We were formed in 1986 as an insurance company in Bermuda and
began our operations providing insurance solutions to
environmental remediation businesses in the U.S. at a time
when insurance coverage for these risks was virtually
unavailable. Since then, we have continued to identify
opportunities in other industry sectors underserved by standard
insurance carriers where we believe we can achieve strong and
consistent returns on equity. We capitalize on these
opportunities by (i) leveraging our strong relationships
with agents and brokers, which we refer to as producers, among
whom we believe we have a recognized commitment to the specialty
insurance market, (ii) charging a higher premium for the
risks we underwrite and the services we offer due to the limited
availability of insurance coverages for these risks and
(iii) mitigating our loss exposure through customized
policy terms, specialized underwriting and proactive loss
control and claims management.
We insure and place risks primarily through our two
U.S. insurance subsidiaries, American Safety Casualty
Insurance Company (American Safety Casualty) and
American Safety Indemnity Company (American Safety
Indemnity), and our U.S. non-subsidiary risk
retention group affiliate, American Safety Risk Retention Group,
Inc. (American Safety RRG). We reinsure a portion of
these risks through our Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary, American
Safety Reinsurance, Ltd. (American Safety Re) and
our Bermuda segregated account captive, American Safety
Assurance Ltd. (American Safety Assurance). American
Safety Assurance serves as a risk sharing vehicle for program
managers and insureds. Our Bermuda subsidiaries also facilitate
the allocation of risk among our insurance subsidiaries and
provide us with greater flexibility in managing our capital. Our
subsidiary American Safety Insurance Services, Inc. (ASI
Services) provides a range of insurance management and
administrative services for American Safety Casualty, American
Safety Indemnity and American Safety RRG.
Our Market
We actively participate in both the excess and surplus lines
(E&S) and the alternative risk transfer
(ART) insurance markets.
Excess and surplus lines insurers provide coverage for difficult
to place risks that do not fit the underwriting criteria of
insurance companies operating in the standard insurance market.
In the standard insurance market, policies must be written by
insurance companies that are licensed to transact business as
admitted carriers by the state insurance regulators in the state
in which the policies are issued. Standard insurance market
policy rates and forms are highly regulated and coverages are
largely uniform. In contrast, excess and surplus lines insurers
are less restricted by these rate and form filing regulations,
thereby providing them with more flexibility over the premiums
they can charge and the policy terms and conditions they can
offer.
Also included in our description of the excess and surplus lines
market is the specialty admitted market. Insurance carriers
operating in the specialty admitted market underwrite complex
risks similar to excess and surplus lines carriers, but are
licensed by the insurance regulators in the states in which they
operate as admitted insurance companies. Although they are
admitted in the jurisdictions in which they operate, specialty
admitted carriers are typically less restricted by policy rate
and form regulations than
54
standard admitted carriers due to the complexity of the risks
being underwritten, the absence of standard market coverage or
the nature of the coverages provided. Some insureds with complex
insurance needs require coverage from an admitted insurance
company due to regulatory, legal, marketing or other factors. We
currently underwrite specialty admitted policies in our
environmental business line in California, Illinois, New Jersey,
Texas and New York. We also write a small portion of our
specialty program business on an admitted basis. Additionally,
all of our surety bonds are written on an admitted basis in
accordance with standard industry practice.
The property and casualty insurance industry has historically
been a cyclical industry consisting of both hard
market periods and soft market periods. The
excess and surplus lines market historically has tended to move
in response to the underwriting cycles in the standard insurance
market. Hard market periods are characterized by shortages of
underwriting capacity, limited availability of capital, less
competition and higher premium rates. Typically, during hard
markets, as rates increase and coverage terms become more
restrictive, business shifts from the standard insurance market
to the excess and surplus lines market as standard insurance
market carriers rely on traditional underwriting techniques and
focus on their core business lines. In soft markets, business
shifts from the excess and surplus lines market to the standard
insurance market as standard insurance market carriers tend to
loosen underwriting standards and seek to expand market share by
moving into business lines traditionally characterized as
surplus lines.
Since 2000, the excess and surplus lines market has grown
substantially both in terms of available premium as well as in
relation to the overall U.S. commercial property and
casualty market. According to A.M. Best, from 2000 to 2003, the
excess and surplus lines market grew at a 29.5% compounded
annual growth rate, and increased as a percentage of the overall
U.S. commercial property and casualty insurance market from
7.6% to 13.7%. However, from 2003 to 2004, the latest year for
which industry data is available from A.M. Best, the
year-over-year growth rate was 0.7% as competition increased and
the rate of price increases slowed. In 2004, U.S. excess
and surplus lines direct premiums written totaled over
$33.0 billion and represented approximately 14.9% of the
total U.S. commercial property and casualty insurance
market.
Since 2004, we believe the property and casualty insurance
market has started to soften and that the number of insurers
competing for premium in the excess and surplus lines market has
increased. These competitors include several
start-up companies as
well as larger standard market insurers looking to capture
market share by moving from the admitted market to the excess
and surplus lines market. This increased competition has caused
rates to modestly decline in some of our targeted markets.
Despite this modest softening trend, we believe that the current
market environment is favorable and believe there are profitable
growth opportunities from which we can benefit.
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
The alternative risk transfer market provides insurance and risk
management products for insureds who want more control over the
claims administration process and who pay very high insurance
premiums or are unable to find adequate insurance coverage. The
ART market originated during the 1980s when obtaining various
types of commercial liability insurance coverages was difficult
for businesses in certain industries due to the nature of their
operations or the industries in which they operated. To meet the
risk management or insurance needs of these businesses, new risk
transfer solutions were developed, such as captive insurance
companies and risk retention groups. Captive insurance companies
are risk sharing vehicles, the assets of which are contributed
by one interest or a group of related interests so as to provide
insurance coverage for their business operations. Risk retention
groups are companies that are owned by their insureds that,
while being licensed only in the state of their formation, are
able to write insurance in all states. These alternative risk
transfer arrangements blend risk transfer and risk retention
mechanisms and, along with self-insurance, form the ART market.
The ART market has grown substantially over the past five years
through the creation of additional captives and risk retention
groups. According to A.M. Best, net premiums written in the ART
market
55
grew approximately 56% between 2000 and 2004, although only by
3.6% from 2003 to 2004. During this time, the ART market
expanded to include a wider range of risk sharing vehicles, and
benefited from more favorable regulation in certain
jurisdictions in the U.S. The ART market has responded
effectively to the strategic needs of insureds for better
financial management, improved claims handling, more effective
risk management, customized insurance programs and access to
reinsurance markets.
The ART market has traditionally been inversely correlated to
the standard markets underwriting cycle, expanding in hard
market periods and retracting in soft market periods. We
believe, however, that this correlation has become less
meaningful in recent years as ART solutions have become more
accessible and better managed, evidenced by a sharp increase in
the number of captive formations and more domestic and offshore
domiciles, such as Vermont and Bermuda, offering regulatory
environments conducive to captive formations and operations.
While this continued growth has contributed to the competitive
environment in the ART market, customers in certain industries,
such as healthcare and construction, continue to experience
difficulty obtaining adequate and affordable coverages that meet
their needs.
Our Products
Our core product segments include excess and surplus lines and
alternative risk transfer.
Excess and Surplus Lines. We focus our excess and surplus
lines segment on small to medium-sized businesses in industries
such as environmental and construction because we believe that,
due to the complex risk profile of those businesses and their
smaller account sizes, there is less competition to underwrite
these risks. We provide the following excess and surplus lines
products in the following industries:
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental. We underwrite various types of
environmental risks, including contractors pollution
liability, environmental consultants professional
liability and environmental impairment liability. We do not
provide coverage for manufacturers or installers of products
containing asbestos that have been the subject of class action
lawsuits, but instead insure the contractors who remediate
asbestos. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we had
gross premiums written of $51.0 million and net premiums
written of $41.5 million in our environmental business
line, representing 21.4% and 29.5% of our total gross and net
premiums written, respectively. For the three months ended March
31, 2006, we had gross premiums written of $12.6 million and net
premiums written of $8.1 million in our environmental business
line, representing 23.8% and 24.0% of our total gross and net
premiums written, respectively. From 2000 through 2005, we
achieved a compounded annual growth rate in gross premiums
written of 30.4% in our environmental business line. |
The environmental risks we underwrite are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Contractors Pollution Liability. Includes general
and pollution liability coverage for third party claims for
bodily injury and property damage, including
clean-up costs
resulting from pollution conditions. Many of these contractors
operate in the pollution remediation industry, engaging in
activities such as hazardous waste remediation, soil
remediation, emergency response and storage tank installation or
removal. This coverage is offered on either an occurrence basis
or a claims made and reported basis. Coverage written on an
occurrence basis provides coverage to the insured for
occurrences during the coverage period while coverage written on
a claims made and reported basis provides coverage to the
insured only for losses reported during the coverage period. |
|
|
|
Environmental Consultants Professional Liability.
Includes professional liability coverage for the unique
exposures inherent to environmental professionals including
consultants, engineers, design professionals and laboratories.
We provide coverage for third party claims resulting from
professional services rendered by the insured. This coverage is
written on a claims made and reported basis. |
56
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Impairment Liability. Includes coverage for
both off-site and
on-site third party
bodily injury, property damage and
clean-up costs arising
from pollution conditions emanating from or at sites owned or
operated by an insured. Our typical insureds for this coverage
include waste treatment and disposal facilities, manufacturing
facilities, chemical manufacturers and blenders, electric
utilities, recyclers, owners and operators of storage tank
facilities, dry cleaners, convenience stores, gasoline stations,
trucking and distribution centers and petroleum marketers.
Coverage is written on a claims made and reported basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction. We underwrite various types of residential
and commercial construction risks. Our construction insurance
coverages consist mostly of primary general and excess general
liability coverages for insureds located primarily in the
western U.S. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we
had gross premiums written of $95.4 million and net
premiums written of $78.0 million in our construction
business line, representing 40.1% and 55.5% of our total gross
premiums written and net premiums written, respectively. For the
three months ended March 31, 2006, we had gross premiums written
of $23.1 million and net premiums written of $20.4 million in
our construction business line, representing 43.4% and 60.6% of
our total gross premiums written and net premiums written,
respectively. From 2000 through 2005, we achieved a compounded
annual growth rate in gross premiums written of 51.6% in our
construction business line. |
The construction risks we underwrite include:
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Construction. We provide coverage for
contractors involved with the construction and remodeling of
residential homes. The types of residential contractors we
insure primarily include graders, framers, concrete workers and
drywall installers. For the year ended December 31, 2005,
residential construction represented 57.0% of our total
construction gross premiums written. For the three months ended
March 31, 2006, residential construction represented 63.0%
of our total construction gross premiums written. |
|
|
|
Commercial Construction. The commercial contractors we
insure primarily include framers (predominantly for apartments),
concrete workers and graders. Many of the commercial contractors
we insure derive a portion of their revenues from residential
construction work, and consequently, most standard market
insurance companies will not offer them coverage. Due to our
understanding of the residential construction market, we are
able to fill a market void for certain commercial contractors
and can insure these contractors for an attractive premium per
dollar of risk and with customized policy terms. For the year
ended December 31, 2005, commercial construction
represented 34.0% of our total construction gross premiums
written. For the three months ended March 31, 2006,
commercial construction represented 26.4% of our total
construction gross premiums written. |
|
|
|
Also included in our construction business line are other excess
and surplus lines coverages for underserved markets, including
general liability for building owners and equipment dealers and
products liability for product manufacturers and distributors.
The gross premiums written associated with these excess and
surplus lines policies represented 9.0% of our total
construction gross premiums written for the year ended
December 31, 2005. For the three months ended
March 31, 2006, gross premiums written associated with
these excess and surplus lines policies represented 10.6% of our
total construction gross premiums written. |
|
|
|
|
|
Surety. Surety is a contract under which an
insurer guarantees certain obligations of a second party to a
third party. We are listed as an acceptable surety on federal
bonds, commonly known as a Treasury-listed or
T-listed surety, primarily providing contract
performance and payment bonds to environmental contractors and
general construction contractors in 47 states and the
District of Columbia. For the year ended December 31, 2005,
we had gross premiums written of $2.6 million and net
premiums written of $1.3 million in our surety business
line, representing 1.1% and 1.0% of our total gross premiums
written and net premiums written, respectively. For the three
months ended March 31, 2006, we had gross premiums written
of $870,000 and net premiums |
57
|
|
|
|
|
written of $440,000 in our surety business line, representing
1.6% and 1.3% of our total gross premiums written and net
premiums written, respectively. |
Alternative Risk Transfer. We provide the following
alternative risk transfer products:
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs. Working with third party program
managers, reinsurance intermediaries and reinsurers, we target
small and medium-sized businesses with homogenous groups of
specialty risks where the principal insurance requirements are
general, professional or pollution liability. We outsource the
underwriting and program administration duties for these
programs to program managers with established underwriting
expertise in the specialty program area. Our specialty programs
consist primarily of casualty insurance coverages for
construction contractors, pest control operators, small auto
dealers, real estate brokers, apartment owners, restaurant
owners, tavern owners, bail bondsmen and Hawaii taxicab
operators. |
|
|
|
We differentiate ourselves from our program competitors in
primarily two ways. First, we typically require the originators
of the business, the program managers, to share in the risk and
profits of the business they produce by assuming a portion of
the premiums and the losses on the coverage being offered
through the provision of collateral. Our Bermuda segregated
account captive, American Safety Assurance, facilitates the risk
sharing position of program managers by providing a vehicle
through which program managers collateralize their portion of
the risk. The requirement to share a portion of the risk
encourages program managers to focus on underwriting
profitability rather than solely on the production of commission
income through premium volume. Second, we choose to focus on
smaller programs where there are fewer competitors, thereby
allowing us to obtain terms and conditions more favorable to us. |
|
|
In 2005, we had gross premiums written of $85.1 million and
net premiums written of $19.7 million in our specialty
programs business line, representing 35.8% and 14.0% of our
total gross and net premiums written, respectively. For the
three months ended March 31, 2006, we had gross premiums written
of $16.3 million and net premiums written of $4.5 million in our
specialty programs business line, representing 30.7% and 13.5%
of our total gross and net premiums written, respectively. From
2000 through 2005, we have achieved a compounded annual growth
rate in gross premiums written of 20.2% in our specialty
programs business line. We also earn fee income on certain
specialty program business that we write. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fully-Funded. Fully-funded policies allow us to meet the
needs of insureds that, due to the nature of their businesses,
pay very high insurance premiums or are unable to find adequate
insurance coverage. Typically, our insureds are required to
maintain insurance coverage to operate their business and the
fully-funded product allows these insureds to provide evidence
of insurance, yet at the same time maintain more control over
insurance costs and handling of claims. Our fully-funded product
accomplishes this by giving our insureds the ability to fund
their liability exposures via a self-insurance vehicle, such as
our segregated account captive, American Safety Assurance, or
through another captive vehicle established by the insured. We
do not assume underwriting risk on these policies, but instead
earn fees for providing the policies, which are recorded as
premiums. Policy limits are set based on the requirements of the
insured, and the insured funds the entire aggregate limit
through a combination of cash and irrevocable letters of credit.
These cash amounts are not accounted for as premiums written.
The aggregate policy limit caps the total damages payable under
the policy, including all defense costs. We write fully-funded
general and professional liability policies for businesses
operating primarily in the healthcare and construction
industries. During 2005 we generated $1.2 million in fees
from fully-funded business. Fee income for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 was $492,000 compared to $160,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2005. |
Runoff. When certain business lines do not meet our
profit or production expectations, we take corrective actions,
which may include exiting those business lines. When we exit a
business line, we no longer renew or write any new policies in
that business line, although we do continue to service existing
58
policies until they expire and administer any claims associated
with those policies. The business lines we have exited since
2002 are:
|
|
|
|
|
Workers Compensation. In 1994, we began writing
workers compensation insurance for environmental
contractors. During 2003, we placed this business line into
runoff due to unfavorable loss experience as well as the high
expenses associated with servicing this business line. The
claims associated with this business line are being administered
by a third party. At December 31, 2005, we were carrying
net reserves of $12.0 million related to this business line. |
|
|
|
Excess Liability Insurance for Municipalities. We began
writing excess liability insurance for municipalities in 2000.
During 2003, we placed this business line into runoff due to a
lack of premium production and difficulty in obtaining
affordable reinsurance coverage. At December 31, 2005, we
were carrying net reserves of $11.1 million related to this
business line. |
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that certain aspects of our business model support
our competitive position in the specialty insurance market,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Focus on underserved insurance markets. We focus on
providing insurance products and solutions to niche, underserved
markets which exhibit less competition than the standard
insurance market and where we have specialized expertise. The
coverages we provide are typically nondiscretionary for the
insurance buyer, where the purchase of the insurance coverage is
required for the continued operation of the insureds
business. We believe that we have developed an effective
approach to identifying voids in the insurance market where we
have more flexibility over the premiums we can charge and the
terms and conditions we can offer for our policies. |
|
|
|
Versatile organizational structure. Unlike many of our
specialty market competitors, our structure includes both
Bermuda-domiciled reinsurance and captive companies and
U.S.-domiciled admitted
and non-admitted insurance companies and a non-affiliated risk
retention group. This structure gives us the flexibility to
utilize our
U.S.-domiciled
insurance companies to write admitted and non-admitted policies,
our Bermuda reinsurance companies to act as a reinsurer of those
policies, our Bermuda captive to serve as a risk sharing vehicle
for program managers and insureds and our risk retention group
to write policies without having to qualify to do so in each
state. Our organizational structure allows us to effectively
respond to market trends and to meet the needs of our producers
and insureds. |
|
|
|
Commitment to underwriting discipline. Our assessment of
our ability to produce an underwriting profit is a driving
factor in deciding whether or not to expand our business or,
conversely, to contract our capacity in the markets we serve.
Our loss ratio, as compared to the property and casualty
industry average, is a testament to our underwriting discipline.
According to A.M. Bests Aggregates and Averages for
Property and Casualty Insurers, from 1998 through 2004 the
average net loss ratio for the property and casualty industry
was 79.2%, while our average net loss ratio over the same period
was 58.2%. |
|
|
|
Proactive claims management and loss control practices.
We emphasize a fair but firm claims handling philosophy. Our
adjusters promptly and thoroughly investigate claims and
strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of our policies. We
also employ loss control practices designed to monitor and
improve our insureds safety and quality control
procedures. Claims management and loss control play an important
part in our underwriting process by enhancing our
underwriters awareness of emerging issues. |
|
|
|
Valuable distribution relationships. We utilize the
services of producers to attract new business and to retain
existing clients. During our twenty-year history, we have
developed strong relationships with producers who we believe
consider us to be a preferred source for insurance solutions for
unique or difficult to place risks. We currently market our
products through over 230 producers in all 50 states
and the District of Columbia. |
59
|
|
|
|
|
Strong financial strength rating. We are rated
A (Excellent), with a negative outlook,
and have been assigned a financial size category of VIII by A.M.
Best. We believe our rating from A.M. Best is important to our
producers and insureds because it instills confidence in our
capital strength and ability to pay claims. A.M. Best assigned a
negative outlook to the rating in September 2004 in
response to our reserve strengthening in the second quarter of
2004 because of a concern by A.M. Best with the underwriting
results from our core business lines and the potential for
further reserve strengthening in the future. A.M. Best
reaffirmed this rating and outlook in November 2005. A.M.
Bests rating and outlook should not be considered as an
investment recommendation. For additional information on our
A.M. Best rating, see Risk Factors and
Rating. |
Our Strategy
We intend to support the managed growth of our business and
enhance shareholder value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase our retention of the business we currently
write. In the past, we have relied heavily on reinsurance
due to capital and rating agency considerations. In July 2005,
however, we ceased purchasing reinsurance on the primary general
liability portion of our construction business line. We made
this decision after performing a loss cost and dynamic financial
analysis and concluding that our reinsurance purchases were
uneconomical. We believe retaining this exposure will enhance
our financial results and returns on capital. We also plan to
reduce our dependence on reinsurance and increase our retention
of the business that we write in other areas such as specialty
programs, environmental and surety. |
|
|
|
Grow opportunistically our core business lines. We plan
to grow opportunistically our business in markets where we have
specialized expertise to control risk and maximize underwriting
profits, both by expanding premium writings in existing products
and by expanding in geographic areas where we have less market
presence. |
|
|
|
|
|
In our environmental business line, approximately 4.0% of our
gross premiums written were generated from our environmental
impairment liability product for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. We plan to expand writings in this product
and have recently added underwriting expertise necessary to
support this growth. We also intend to contribute to the
expansion of the environmental business line by increasing our
online distribution capabilities. |
|
|
|
In our construction business line, 93.0% of our gross premiums
written were generated from policies written in the western
U.S., primarily California, for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. We plan to expand geographically in
response to decreasing availability of general liability
insurance for residential contractors in other areas of the U.S. |
|
|
|
In our alternative risk transfer segment, we plan to expand
writings of our fully-funded product by increasing our
distribution sources. A significant portion of our fully-funded
fees are generated through five producers. We also plan to
expand our specialty programs business line by adding new
programs as well as increasing our capacity in existing
programs. For example, in January 2006 we implemented a new
program providing general liability coverage for owners of
senior habitational facilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Grow into new product lines. In the past, we have
identified profitable opportunities in underserved sectors of
the insurance industry to expand our business lines and
products. We plan opportunistically to develop new insurance
products outside our core business lines for customers in
underserved markets. As an example, in 2004 we introduced our
fully-funded business line, which reflected our ability to
expand our product offerings to meet the specific insurance
needs of our customers. |
|
|
|
Pursue potential acquisitions on a selective basis. We
continually pursue opportunities to acquire managing general
agents, program managers, specialty books of business and
experienced underwriting teams with a demonstrated history of
profitable underwriting in specialty business |
60
|
|
|
|
|
lines. The acquisition of managing general agents and program
managers would present an opportunity to grow our specialty
program business, and the acquisition of specialty books of
business and experienced underwriting teams would provide an
opportunity to expand our product offerings. Historically,
acquisitions have not played a large role in our business, but
we expect them to be an important part of our strategy in the
future. |
|
|
|
Leverage our investments in information technology and
enhance operational efficiencies. We have worked extensively
to increase the efficiency and decrease the cost of processing
the business we produce. We believe our technology is scalable
and can be modified at minimal cost to accommodate our growth.
We expect that our investment in information technology and
improved operational efficiency will contribute to a lower
expense ratio as we achieve premium growth over time. For more
information on the investments we have made in information
technology, see Technology. |
|
|
|
Actively manage our capital. The level of capital that we
maintain, and how we deploy that capital, is an important factor
in maintaining our A (Excellent) financial strength
rating from A.M. Best. In evaluating our strategic initiatives,
we actively consider the associated impact that these
initiatives may have on our capital requirements. We believe our
rating from A.M. Best is a competitive advantage to us and
maintaining it will be a principal consideration in our
decisions regarding growth and capital management. |
Our Competition
The property and casualty insurance market is highly competitive
with respect to a number of factors, including overall financial
strength of a given insurer, ratings of insurance companies by
rating agencies, premium rates, policy terms and conditions,
services offered, reputation and commission rates. We believe
competition in the sectors of the specialty insurance market we
target is fragmented and not dominated by one or more
competitors. We frequently encounter competition from other
insurance companies that insure risks in business lines that may
encompass the specialty markets in which we operate, as well as
from standard insurance carriers as they try to gain market
share and become more comfortable underwriting the risks in the
markets which we serve. The insurance companies with which we
compete vary by the industries we target and the types of
coverage we offer.
We believe our A (Excellent) rating from
A.M. Best, focus on underserved markets, strong
relationships with producers and versatile corporate structure
are competitive strengths for us and are important factors in
providing opportunities for growth.
Rating
In November 2005, A.M. Best, the most widely recognized
insurance company rating agency, reaffirmed its rating of
A (Excellent), with a negative outlook
on a group basis of American Safety Insurance, including our two
U.S. insurance subsidiaries, our Bermuda reinsurance
subsidiary and our U.S. non-subsidiary risk retention group
affiliate. An A (Excellent) rating is the third
highest of fifteen ratings assigned by A.M. Best to companies
that have, in the opinion of A.M. Best, an excellent ability to
meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders. A.M. Best
assigned a negative outlook to the rating in
September 2004 in response to our reserve strengthening in the
second quarter 2004 because of a concern by A.M. Best with the
underwriting results from our core business lines and the
potential for further reserve strengthening in the future.
Some policyholders are required to obtain insurance coverage
from insurance companies that have an A- (Excellent)
rating or higher from A.M. Best. Additionally, many producers
are prohibited by their internal guidelines from representing
insurance companies that are rated below A-
(Excellent) by A.M. Best. A.M. Best assigns ratings
that represent an independent opinion of an insurers
ability to meet its obligations to policyholders that is of
concern primarily to policyholders, insurance brokers and agents
and its rating and outlook should not be considered an
investment recommendation. This rating is not a continually
monitored rating and is subject to change. Any investor for whom
this rating may be important
61
as of any date subsequent to the date of this prospectus should
obtain this rating from A.M. Best and not rely on the rating set
out above.
We have also been assigned a financial size category of
Class VIII by A.M. Best. A financial size category of
Class VIII is assigned by A.M. Best to companies with
adjusted policyholder surplus of $100 million to
$250 million, which, on a statutory basis of accounting, is
the amount remaining after all liabilities, including loss
reserves, are subtracted from all admitted assets.
The Company has not retained S&P or any other service to
rate its subsidiaries. Despite this, based solely on publicly
available information, in October 2005, S&P rated American
Safety RRG, American Safety Casualty and American Safety
Indemnity Bpi, and Fitch Ratings rated these three
entities BBBq. An S&P pi rating is a
financial strength rating based on published financial
information, as distinguished from ratings determined through
in-depth meetings with company officials. Similarly, a rating
from Fitch Ratings with a q subscript is generated
solely using a model that utilizes publicly available financial
statement information, without any discussion with senior
management.
Distribution
The specific distribution channels we use vary by business line.
We market our excess and surplus products through approximately
230 producers in all 50 states and the District of
Columbia. Within our excess and surplus lines segment, our
environmental insurance products are written through a mix of
retailers and wholesalers, while our construction insurance
products are marketed exclusively through wholesale brokers. The
only producer that produces greater than 10% of our total gross
premiums written is Cooney, Rikard & Curtain Insurance
Services, Inc., which produced approximately 18.5% of our total
gross premiums written for the year ended December 31,
2005, which was 45.9% of our total construction gross premiums
written for the same period. In addition, Brown & Brown,
Inc. produced approximately 9.6% of our total gross premiums
written for the year ended December 31, 2005, which was
23.1% of our construction gross premiums written for the same
period. Our alternative risk transfer specialty program products
are distributed through active solicitation by program managers
and managing general agents with established underwriting
expertise in a specialty program area, to whom we outsource the
underwriting and program administration duties. In addition to
program managers, reinsurance intermediaries and brokers also
serve as a distribution source of program business. Our
fully-funded products are marketed primarily through retail
brokers, particularly those with a sophisticated understanding
of the alternative risk transfer market.
Technology
We seek to improve the efficiency of our operations by
integrating data throughout the organization and by moving data
entry functions closer to the source of the information by
providing our producers access to our systems via the Internet.
We utilize two primary information processing systems that are
an integral part of our operations and are discussed below.
Ultimately, we believe that these investments in technology will
result in a decrease in our expense ratio by enabling us to
increase premium volume without requiring significant additional
staff. Our information technology department consists of eleven
full-time employees, as well as third-party vendors who support
our existing technology platform.
|
|
|
|
|
ProStar. Launched in 2001, ProStar is an online
electronic submission, rating and quoting system used to process
new and renewal business submissions for smaller businesses with
environmental risks. The policies we process through ProStar are
combined general, professional and pollution liability policies
designed for environmental contractors and consultants with
annual revenues of $3.0 million or less. ProStar increases
product distribution for smaller environmental accounts while
reducing associated underwriting and operating costs. In 2005,
gross premiums written generated through ProStar totaled
approximately $27.0 million, representing a 103.0% increase
from 2004. In addition, policy counts were up 25.0% in 2005 as
compared to 2004. For the three months ended March 31,
2006, gross premiums written generated through ProStar totaled
approximately $7.5 million, representing a 30.8% increase
from the same period of 2005. ProStar policy counts |
62
|
|
|
|
|
increased 7.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as
compared to the same period of 2005. We believe this technology
is scalable to other products and can be modified to accommodate
our growth. |
|
|
|
Integrated Software Package. We purchased an integrated
software package in 2003 that addresses underwriting, premium
accounting, claims and forms processing functions and is a
secure and consolidated collection of primary insurance data
that feeds a data warehouse for management reporting and
analysis. The system has been implemented in our construction
and environmental business lines, and we believe it is scalable
to other products as they are developed. |
|
|
|
WorkSmart Initiative. In 2004, we began a process
improvement initiative in our underwriting and claims
departments, which we internally refer to as
WorkSmart. This initiative has resulted in the
restructuring of workflow within the Company. As a result, we
have improved both the efficiency of how we process business and
the productivity of our underwriting and claims personnel. We
believe this initiative will result in our ability to expand our
operations without increasing personnel. |
Underwriting
Our underwriting staff handles the insurance underwriting
functions for all excess and surplus lines products, with
specific underwriting authority related to the experience and
knowledge level of each underwriter. Risks that are perceived to
be more difficult and complex are underwritten by experienced
staff and reviewed by management. The principal factors we use
for underwriting these risks include the professional experience
of the insured, its operating history, its loss history and, in
the case of renewals, its demonstrated commitment to effective
loss control and risk management practices.
Most of our underwriters have approximately twenty years of
underwriting experience and in excess of ten years of
underwriting experience in the specialty areas we target. We
differentiate ourselves from other companies by individually
underwriting and pricing each risk, as opposed to the general
classification pricing practices which are often performed by
larger insurance companies. We seek to instill a culture of
underwriting profitability over premium volume and our
underwriters incentive compensation is based on
underwriting profits rather than premium growth. We also enforce
an internal quality control standard through periodic audits of
underwriter files. Underwriters meet monthly to discuss the
status of renewal business with members of the claims
department, who adjust claims as reported under a policy, and
members of the loss control department, who measure and monitor
an insureds safety and risk management policies.
An important part of the underwriting and risk control process
is the use of customized policy forms and contract wording to
limit our ultimate exposure on many of the specialty risks we
insure and to adequately respond to evolving claims trends in
our core product lines. These trends are often identified
through the monthly meetings among claims, loss control and
underwriting personnel. Policy terms and conditions are crafted
in cooperation with legal counsel to avoid or restrict coverage
for certain high exposure risks. Standard, or admitted, carriers
do not have the same flexibility to control policy language
because they are more heavily regulated by the individual states
in which they operate, and are generally required to use
standard insurance forms that are broader in coverage.
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
We perform an extensive due diligence process which involves
detailed reviews of underwriting, policy pricing practices,
claims handling, management expertise, information systems and
distribution networks on every new program we develop. Based on
the results of the due diligence, underwriting guidelines are
developed that are specific to each program, and must be adhered
to by program managers. We also perform an actuarial analysis on
each program, to ensure that the business projections meet our
profitability requirements, as well as to determine the
appropriate level of risk participation by us and the program
manager. After the program is implemented, we utilize our
internal underwriting, claims,
63
accounting and regulatory personnel to conduct semi-annual
audits of each programs underwriting, actuarial, claim
handling and insurance processing functions to ensure adherence
to established guidelines and to assess the long-term profit
potential of the program.
Claims Management
The specialty risks that we underwrite are complex and the
claims reported by our insureds often involve coverage issues,
or may result in litigation, that require handling by a claims
professional with specialized knowledge and claims management
expertise. Accordingly, we employ experienced claims
professionals with broad backgrounds, many with more than
20 years of experience in resolving the types of claims
that typically arise from the specialty risks we underwrite. Our
Chief Claims Officer has more than 25 years of diverse
experience in claims management for specialty risks, including
specific experience with claims involving complex coverage
issues, and has managed claims operations with as many as
1,000 employees. We believe our claims management approach,
which is focused on achieving the best possible financial
outcome through prompt case evaluation and proactive litigation
management practices, combined with our industry expertise is
integral to controlling our losses and loss adjustment expenses.
We also utilize the knowledge and expertise that we gain through
the claims management process to enhance our underwriting and
marketing activities through frequent interaction among the
claims, underwriting and loss control staffs.
With the exception of construction defect claims associated with
our construction business line, claims arising out of policies
issued in our excess and surplus lines segment are handled
primarily by our internal claims adjustors. Because construction
defect claims require specialized knowledge of local markets and
regulations, since 2004, the majority of our construction defect
claims have been handled by third party administrators
(TPAs) located in California. However, as a result
of premium growth in the construction business line and our
decision to take a larger risk position on the construction
policies we underwrite, in February 2006 we established an
internal claims handling office in California to manage our
construction defect claims. This office is staffed with eight
adjustors with an average of more than 15 years of
experience managing construction defect claims. We believe that
the establishment of this office will reduce our reliance on
TPAs, enhance our market presence in the western U.S. and enable
us to more effectively and profitably manage our construction
defect claims.
We have established claims management best practices, which
emphasize the thorough investigation of claims, prompt
settlement of valid claims, aggressive defense against claims we
believe to be without merit and the accurate establishment of
reserves. We recently established a quality assurance unit that
is responsible for establishing and maintaining claims handling
best practices and monitoring the uniform and consistent
application of these practices. This is accomplished primarily
through monthly audits of claims files as well as broader
departmental audits, as necessary. The audit process includes a
detailed evaluation of all facets of the claims management
process including investigation, litigation and reserving. These
audits are used to measure both departmental and individual
performance and identify areas for improvement. We have a claims
committee, comprised of claims adjusting staff and claims
management, that meets on a bi-weekly basis to discuss high
exposure and complex claims to address litigation management
strategies, coverage issues and the setting of reserves above
established authority levels.
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
Claims management also plays an important role in achieving our
profitability goals in our alternative risk transfer segment. We
use TPAs to handle substantially all of the claims arising from
policies written in our alternative risk transfer segment. In
some cases, the program manager responsible for the development
and management of a particular program has established claims
management expertise in the business line written under the
program and will act as the TPA for the program. By utilizing
TPAs, we gain immediate access to the required claims handling
expertise in the unique business lines we underwrite. Our
selected TPAs undergo a rigorous pre-qualification process and
are closely monitored and
64
regularly audited. We select only TPAs with claims personnel
experienced in handling claims for the types of risks typical of
our specialty programs and fully-funded accounts.
To assist us in our selection and monitoring of TPAs, we employ
an internal claims staff responsible for both selecting the TPAs
as well as ensuring the quality of claims adjudication by the
TPAs. Our internal program claims staff pre-qualifies TPAs based
on a detailed process that considers, among other
characteristics, expertise in a particular business line,
reserving philosophy, litigation management philosophy and
management controls.
Once a TPA is qualified and selected, it is given limited
reserve and settlement authority. We approve every claim in
excess of a TPAs established settlement authority.
Additionally, all coverage issues or disputes are required to be
reported to our internal staff. To ensure that the TPAs we
employ meet our performance standards, we conduct regular
on-site claims audits.
Recommendations arising from the claims audits are communicated
to the TPA and an agreed upon action plan is implemented.
Compliance with the action plan is closely monitored by our
staff to ensure acceptable resolution to all recommendations.
Loss Control
Loss control is not a widely utilized risk management tool by
excess and surplus lines companies. We believe, however, that
loss control provides significant value to our underwriters as
part of their risk selection process, and to our insureds in the
improvement of their risk management practices. Our loss control
unit assists insureds and our underwriters with regulatory
compliance monitoring, the identification and analysis of risk
exposures and the selection and implementation of effective risk
management practices. Loss control services are utilized most
often by our environmental and construction underwriting units
as part of their account evaluation and maintenance process.
Loss control reports are generated on individual accounts and
reviewed by underwriters as part of their underwriting
evaluation. Underwriters meet monthly with the loss control unit
to discuss the results of inspections on individual accounts as
part of their renewal risk selection process. Our loss control
services for individual accounts include an initial assessment
of regulatory policies and procedures and risk management
practices and targeted physical inspections, which are performed
by outside professional loss control services companies.
Within our construction and environmental business lines, the
only business lines for which we perform loss control, our
inspection process includes an office interview with company
management to assess the written policies and procedures as well
as the overall corporate approach toward risk management
processes. In our environmental business line, we have developed
specific work standards or guidelines to which
insureds must adhere. In our construction business line, we
review standard contracts utilized for projects as part of our
risk management analysis. A jobsite survey is also performed to
assess the implementation and adherence to company, state and
federal regulations.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance is a contractual arrangement under which one insurer
(the ceding company) transfers to another insurer (the
reinsurer) a portion of the liabilities that the ceding company
has assumed under an insurance policy it has issued. A ceding
company may purchase reinsurance for any number of reasons,
including obtaining, through the transfer of a portion of its
liabilities, greater underwriting capacity than its own capital
resources would otherwise support, to stabilize its underwriting
results, to protect against catastrophic loss and to enter into
or withdraw from a business line. Reinsurance can be written on
either a quota share basis (where premiums and losses are shared
proportionally) or excess of loss basis (where losses are
covered if they exceed a certain amount), under either a treaty
(involving more than one policy) or facultative (involving only
one policy) reinsurance agreement.
65
Our philosophy is to utilize reinsurance for asset protection
against business and capital risks where economically
appropriate and to maximize our use of capital. A description of
our reinsurance structure for our business is as follows:
Environmental. Our reinsurance treaty for environmental
products operates on an excess of loss basis. Prior to
April 1, 2006, our maximum exposure, on a per occurrence
basis, was limited to $500,000. The balance of the risk, up to
$10.5 million in excess of our retention, was ceded to
unaffiliated reinsurers. Effective April 1, 2006, our
reinsurance treaty for environmental products was renewed with
our current maximum exposure on a per occurrence basis limited
to $800,000. The balance of the risk, up to $10.2 million in
excess of our retention, is ceded to unaffiliated reinsurers.
Construction. Effective July 1, 2005, we
discontinued purchasing reinsurance on the primary general
liability portion of our construction business line. We made
this decision after performing a loss cost and dynamic financial
analysis and concluding that our reinsurance purchases were
uneconomical. We believe retaining this exposure will enhance
our financial results and returns on capital. Prior to
July 1, 2005, the reinsurance treaty for our primary
general liability portion of our construction business line
operated on an excess of loss basis providing reinsurance of
$650,000 for each occurrence in excess of a $350,000 per
occurrence retention. We continue to maintain a 25% quota share
participation reinsurance treaty for our excess liability
construction insurance business line. The excess liability
construction policies we write provide reinsurance coverage of
$2.0 million for each occurrence in excess of a primary
general liability policy that provides $1.0 million of
coverage.
Specialty Programs. The majority of our program business
is reinsured under separate quota share reinsurance treaties
that are purchased for each program. Effective September 1,
2005, we entered into an excess of loss reinsurance structure
with several unaffiliated reinsurers that provides reinsurance
limits of up to $800,000 in excess of a $200,000 per
occurrence retention for each program covered under the treaty.
This treaty allows us to consolidate our programs under one
reinsurance treaty and provides a more efficient means of
securing reinsurance for our programs from both a time and cost
standpoint. We have the option of purchasing quota share
reinsurance for a portion of our retention amount if we choose
not to retain the full $200,000 of each occurrence for a given
program.
Surety. For our surety business, we entered into a quota
share reinsurance treaty during the second quarter of 2004 which
provides reinsurance for a single bond limit not to exceed
$3.0 million subject to a maximum for any one principal of
$6.0 million. We retain a 50% participation in this treaty
with the balance reinsured by unaffiliated reinsurers.
Other. We also purchase reinsurance coverage on certain
products that protects us from claims associated with bad faith
allegations, improper claims handling and multiple insureds
being involved in the same occurrence. This reinsurance provides
limits of $5.0 million for any one event, subject to an
aggregate limit of $10.0 million.
We do not have any exposures that exceed the limits stated
above. We may decide to purchase reinsurance that exceeds this
coverage for certain programs. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, we ceded $97.3 million of premium
(40.9% of direct premiums written) to unaffiliated third party
reinsurers. Ceded reinsurance premiums from the specialty
programs business line were 67.2% of this amount.
While reinsurance obligates the reinsurer to reimburse us for a
portion of our losses, it does not relieve us of our primary
liability to our insureds. If our reinsurers are either
unwilling or unable to pay some or all of the claims made by us
on a timely basis, we bear the financial exposure. We have
written reinsurance security procedures that establish financial
requirements for reinsurance companies that must be met prior to
reinsuring any of the business we write. Among these
requirements is a stipulation that reinsurance companies must
have an A.M. Best rating of at least A- (Excellent)
and a financial size category of Class VIII or greater at
the time of writing any reinsurance, unless sufficient
collateral has been provided at the time we enter into our
reinsurance agreement. A financial size category of
Class VIII
66
is assigned by A.M. Best to companies with adjusted policyholder
surplus of $100 million to $250 million, which, on a
statutory basis of accounting, is the amount remaining after all
liabilities, including loss reserves, are subtracted from all
admitted assets. We have also established an internal
reinsurance security committee, consisting of members of senior
management, which meets quarterly to discuss and monitor our
reinsurance coverage.
To protect against our reinsurers inability to satisfy their
contractual obligations to us, our reinsurance contracts
stipulate a collateral requirement for reinsurance companies
that do not meet the financial strength and size requirements
described above. These collateral requirements can be met
through the issuance of unconditional letters of credit, the
establishment and funding of escrow accounts for our benefit or
cash advances paid into a trust account. Collateral may also
include amounts we owe reinsurers for premium in the ordinary
course of business. The following table is a listing of our
largest reinsurers ranked by reinsurance recoverables and
includes the collateral posted by these reinsurance companies as
of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverables at | |
|
Collateral at | |
|
Net Exposure at | |
|
|
A.M. Best | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
Reinsurers |
|
Rating | |
|
2005(1) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Berkley Insurance Company
|
|
|
A |
|
|
$ |
27,377 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,377 |
|
American Constantine Insurance Company,
Ltd.(3)
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
22,678 |
|
|
|
22,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alea Group of Companies
|
|
|
NR-4 |
|
|
|
16,856 |
|
|
|
8,068 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
Folksamerica Reinsurance Company
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
14,638 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
13,387 |
|
QBE Reinsurance Corporation
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
10,799 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
Partner Reinsurance Company
|
|
|
A+ |
|
|
|
10,752 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
9,654 |
|
Aspen Insurance UK Limited
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
10,592 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
9,139 |
|
Louisiana Pest Control Insurance Company
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
8,944 |
|
|
|
8,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transatlantic Reinsurance Company
|
|
|
A+ |
|
|
|
8,230 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
6,919 |
|
Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
7,886 |
|
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
5,106 |
|
America Re-insurance Company
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
7,011 |
|
Odyssey American Reinsurance Corporation
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
7,182 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
7,068 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,421 |
|
|
|
23,006 |
|
|
|
28,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,689 |
|
|
|
72,211 |
|
|
|
132,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
203,371 |
|
|
$ |
72,211 |
|
|
$ |
131,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Total recoverables includes recoverable amounts for paid losses,
case reserves, incurred but not reported reserves and ceded
unearned premiums. |
|
(2) |
For purposes of this table, for a reinsurer who is
overcollateralized, net exposure is reflected as zero. |
|
(3) |
Constitutes a captive supporting risk positions assumed by
program managers on certain specialty programs. |
For more information on the financial exposure we bear with
respect to our reinsurers, see Risk Factors.
67
Selected Operating Information
The following table sets forth our gross premiums written (in
thousands) by business line and the allocation of those premiums
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total | |
|
|
Gross Premiums Written | |
|
Gross Premiums Written | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
34,603 |
|
|
$ |
44,157 |
|
|
$ |
51,014 |
|
|
$ |
13,594 |
|
|
$ |
12,641 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
Construction
|
|
|
85,793 |
|
|
|
96,905 |
|
|
|
95,406 |
|
|
|
27,053 |
|
|
|
23,064 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
121,133 |
|
|
|
142,787 |
|
|
|
149,001 |
|
|
|
41,144 |
|
|
|
36,575 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
73,152 |
|
|
|
76,264 |
|
|
|
85,138 |
|
|
|
22,743 |
|
|
|
16,345 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
Fully-Funded
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
73,690 |
|
|
|
77,545 |
|
|
|
88,960 |
|
|
|
23,060 |
|
|
|
16,608 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) (1) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
212,667 |
|
|
$ |
221,575 |
|
|
$ |
237,880 |
|
|
$ |
64,211 |
|
|
$ |
53,183 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents premiums returned to insureds by us. |
The following table sets forth our net premiums written (in
thousands) by business line and the allocation of those premiums
for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total | |
|
|
Net Premiums Written | |
|
Net Premiums Written | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
27,233 |
|
|
$ |
35,024 |
|
|
$ |
41,477 |
|
|
$ |
10,967 |
|
|
$ |
8,071 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
Construction
|
|
|
73,572 |
|
|
|
77,894 |
|
|
|
78,026 |
|
|
|
22,185 |
|
|
|
20,353 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
101,539 |
|
|
|
114,092 |
|
|
|
120,848 |
|
|
|
33,402 |
|
|
|
28,864 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
85.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
Fully-Funded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
17,530 |
|
|
|
21,749 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) (1) |
|
|
(35 |
) (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
131,478 |
|
|
$ |
131,921 |
|
|
$ |
140,552 |
|
|
$ |
36,770 |
|
|
$ |
33,578 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents premiums returned to insureds by us. |
68
The combined ratio is a standard measure of a property and
casualty insurers performance in managing its losses and
expenses. Underwriting results are generally considered
profitable when the combined ratio is less than 100%. On a GAAP
basis, the combined ratio is determined by adding losses and
loss adjustment expenses incurred and acquisition and other
underwriting insurance expenses and dividing the sum of those
numbers by net premiums earned. Our GAAP combined ratio was
96.8% in 2003, 102.7% in 2004 and 97.8% in 2005 and was 94.5%
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to 99.6%
for the same period in 2006.
The combined ratio of an insurance company measures only the
underwriting results of insurance operations and not the
profitability of the overall company. Our reported combined
ratio for our insurance operations may fluctuate from time to
time depending on our mix of business and may not reflect the
overall profitability of our insurance operations.
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
We are required to maintain reserves to cover the unpaid portion
of our ultimate liability for losses and loss adjustment
expenses with respect to (i) reported claims and
(ii) IBNR claims. A full actuarial analysis is performed to
estimate our unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses under
the terms of our contracts and agreements. In evaluating whether
the reserves are reasonable for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses, it is necessary to project future loss and
loss adjustment expense payments. It is probable that the actual
future losses and loss adjustment expenses will not develop
exactly as projected and may, in fact, vary significantly from
the projections. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for additional information regarding our historical losses and
loss adjustment expenses.
With respect to reported claims, reserves are established on a
case-by-case basis. The reserve amounts on each reported claim
are determined by taking into account the circumstances
surrounding each claim and policy provisions relating to the
type of loss. Loss reserves are reviewed on a regular basis, and
as new information becomes available, appropriate adjustments
are made to reserves.
As of December 31, 2005, approximately $188.3 million,
or 80.5%, of our net reserves related to our excess and surplus
lines segment, $21.4 million, or 9.2%, of our net reserves
were attributable to our alternative risk transfer segment and
the balance of our net reserves, or $24.2 million, was
allocated to our runoff segment.
Our reserve methodology does not differ among business lines,
except with respect to our construction business line as
described below. In establishing reserves, we employ several
methods in determining our ultimate losses: (i) the
expected loss ratio method; (ii) the loss development
method based on paid and reported losses; and (iii) the
Bornhuetter-Ferguson method based on expected loss ratios, paid
losses and reported losses. The expected loss ratio method
incorporates industry expected losses which are adjusted for our
historical loss experience. The loss development method relies
on industry payment and reporting patterns to develop our
estimated losses. The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method is a
combination of the other two methods, using expected loss ratios
to produce expected losses, then applying loss payment and
reporting patterns to our expected losses to produce our
expected IBNR losses. We review the ultimate projections from
all three methods and, based on the merits of each method,
determine our estimated ultimate losses. In response to the
reserve strengthening in the first two quarters of 2004 in our
construction business line and managements concern that
existing reserves for this business line might be inadequate, we
commenced an actuarial reserve evaluation. This evaluation
analyzed reserves by specific risk categories within the
construction business line, such as general liability for
building owners and California contractors, in addition to
analyzing by a single risk category for the entire construction
business line. The results of the specific risk analysis were
then compared to the single risk analysis in determining the
final carried reserves. The establishment of appropriate loss
reserves is an inherently uncertain process, and there can be no
assurance our ultimate liabilities will not materially exceed
our reserves.
69
All of the methods used, as described above, are generally
accepted actuarial methods and rely in part on loss reporting
and payment patterns while considering the long term nature of
some of the coverages and inherent variability in projected
results from
year-to-year. The
patterns used are generally based on industry data with
supplemental consideration given to our experience as deemed
warranted. Industry data is also relied upon as part of the
actuarial analysis, and is used to provide the basis for reserve
analysis on newer business lines. Provisions for inflation are
implicitly considered in the reserving process. Our reserves are
carried at the total estimate for ultimate expected losses and
loss adjustment expenses, without any discount to reflect the
time value of money. Reserve calculations are reviewed regularly
by management and periodically by regulators. A full actuarial
analysis is performed annually, assessing the adequacy of
statutory reserves established by our management. A statutory
actuarial opinion is filed with the various jurisdictions in
which our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries and our
non-subsidiary risk retention group affiliate are licensed.
Statutory reserves are reserves established to
provide for future obligations with respect to all insurance
policies as determined in accordance with statutory accounting
principles (SAP), the rules and procedures
prescribed or permitted by state insurance regulatory
authorities for recording transactions and preparing financial
statements. Based upon the practices and procedures employed by
us described above, management believes that our reserves are
adequate.
The net carried reserves at December 31, 2003, 2004 and
2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
20,700 |
|
|
$ |
32,889 |
|
|
$ |
45,205 |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
60,176 |
|
|
|
106,739 |
|
|
|
142,919 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
81,216 |
|
|
|
139,898 |
|
|
|
188,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
13,746 |
|
|
|
17,560 |
|
|
|
21,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
20,081 |
|
|
|
26,582 |
|
|
|
24,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
115,043 |
|
|
$ |
184,040 |
|
|
$ |
233,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and
ending losses and loss adjustment expenses reserve liability
balances on a GAAP basis for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Gross reserves, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
179,164 |
|
|
$ |
230,104 |
|
|
$ |
321,623 |
|
Ceded reserves, beginning of year
|
|
|
109,543 |
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
137,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves, beginning of year
|
|
|
69,621 |
|
|
|
115,043 |
|
|
|
184,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
60,598 |
|
|
|
79,101 |
|
|
|
81,800 |
|
Prior years
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
14,402 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred
|
|
|
65,834 |
|
|
|
93,503 |
|
|
|
84,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim payments related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
Prior years
|
|
|
17,922 |
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
|
|
31,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claim payments
|
|
|
20,412 |
|
|
|
24,506 |
|
|
|
34,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves, end of year
|
|
|
115,043 |
|
|
|
184,040 |
|
|
|
233,978 |
|
Ceded reserves, end of year
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
137,583 |
|
|
|
160,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross reserves, end of year
|
|
$ |
230,104 |
|
|
$ |
321,623 |
|
|
$ |
394,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The reserve strengthening for prior years for 2003, 2004 and
2005 occurred in the following business lines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
(754 |
) |
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Programs
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
14,402 |
|
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve strengthening for prior years in the construction
business line in 2003 was attributable to developing losses on
(i) contractors liability business written in New
York during 1999 and 2000 and (ii) products liability on
certain types of risk. Reserve strengthening for prior years in
2003 in the runoff lines was primarily due to a
$3.6 million increase in workers compensation
reserves reflecting claim development trends that exceeded
actuarial modeling expectations. In response to this trend, we
changed the assumptions in our workers compensation
valuation model to better reflect historical loss development
patterns.
Reserve strengthening for prior years in the construction
business line in 2004 was attributable to developing losses on
(i) certain New York contractor risks written in 2001 and
(ii) a change in actuarial reserving methodologies to
reflect the creation of more specific risk categories. Exposure
to New York contractor risks was significantly reduced during
2002 and 2003. The runoff lines reserve strengthening in
2004 for prior years was primarily due to $2.9 million of
increases in workers compensation reserves and
$1.6 million of increases in reserves on our assumed
liability program.
Reserve strengthening for prior years in the construction
business line in 2005 was primarily attributable to the
commutation of reinsurance contracts with a former reinsurer.
This transaction resulted in the Company recognizing losses of
$1.0 million in 2005. The runoff lines reserve
strengthening for prior years included $1.2 million
relating to the excess municipality program offset by reserve
redundancy from the workers compensation business line.
71
The following table shows the gross, ceded and net development
of the reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
from 1995 through 2005 for our primary insurance and reinsurance
subsidiaries and our non-subsidiary risk retention group
affiliate on a GAAP basis. The top line of the table shows the
liabilities at the balance sheet date for each of the indicated
years and reflects the estimated amounts for losses and loss
adjustment expenses for claims arising in that year and all
prior years that are unpaid at the balance sheet date, including
IBNR losses. In the gross and ceded sections of the table, the
second line shows the re-estimated amount of previously recorded
liabilities based on experience as of the end of each succeeding
year. The lower portion of the table in the net section shows
the cumulative amounts subsequently paid as of successive years
with respect to the liabilities. The estimates change as more
information becomes known about the frequency and severity of
claims for individual years. A redundancy
(deficiency) exists when the re-estimated liabilities at
each December 31 is less (greater) than the prior
liability estimate. The cumulative redundancy
(deficiency) depicted in the table, for any particular
calendar year, represents the aggregate change in the initial
estimates over all subsequent calendar years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1995 | |
|
1996 | |
|
1997 | |
|
1998 | |
|
1999 | |
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Gross reserves
|
|
|
$8,294 |
|
|
$ |
8,914 |
|
|
$ |
11,572 |
|
|
$ |
14,701 |
|
|
$ |
20,413 |
|
|
|
$50,509 |
|
|
$ |
137,391 |
|
|
$ |
179,164 |
|
|
$ |
230,104 |
|
|
$ |
321,623 |
|
|
|
$394,873 |
|
Re-estimated at 12/31/05
|
|
|
5,712 |
|
|
|
11,591 |
|
|
|
13,486 |
|
|
|
15,322 |
|
|
|
29,498 |
|
|
|
91,793 |
|
|
|
206,276 |
|
|
|
251,745 |
|
|
|
303,217 |
|
|
|
343,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative redundancy (deficiency) on gross reserves
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
(2,677 |
) |
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
(9,085 |
) |
|
|
(41,284 |
) |
|
|
(68,885 |
) |
|
|
(72,581 |
) |
|
|
(73,113 |
) |
|
|
(21,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ceded reserves
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
27,189 |
|
|
|
89,697 |
|
|
|
109,543 |
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
137,583 |
|
|
|
160,895 |
|
Re-estimated at 12/31/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
3,103 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
12,995 |
|
|
|
61,558 |
|
|
|
130,377 |
|
|
|
145,481 |
|
|
|
159,134 |
|
|
|
156,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative redundancy (deficiency) on ceded reserves
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(3,724 |
) |
|
|
(2,324 |
) |
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
|
(6,930 |
) |
|
|
(34,369 |
) |
|
|
(40,721 |
) |
|
|
(35,938 |
) |
|
|
(44,073 |
) |
|
|
(19,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
10,793 |
|
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
14,348 |
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
47,734 |
|
|
|
69,621 |
|
|
|
115,043 |
|
|
|
184,040 |
|
|
|
233,978 |
|
Net Reserves re-estimated at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year later
|
|
|
7,482 |
|
|
|
9,850 |
|
|
|
11,460 |
|
|
|
12,298 |
|
|
|
15,498 |
|
|
|
24,837 |
|
|
|
49,469 |
|
|
|
74,857 |
|
|
|
129,445 |
|
|
|
186,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 years later
|
|
|
7,518 |
|
|
|
9,926 |
|
|
|
12,244 |
|
|
|
12,967 |
|
|
|
15,541 |
|
|
|
26,853 |
|
|
|
53,912 |
|
|
|
93,943 |
|
|
|
144,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 years later
|
|
|
7,398 |
|
|
|
9,606 |
|
|
|
12,550 |
|
|
|
12,677 |
|
|
|
16,452 |
|
|
|
29,242 |
|
|
|
67,072 |
|
|
|
106,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 years later
|
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
|
9,767 |
|
|
|
11,556 |
|
|
|
13,054 |
|
|
|
16,510 |
|
|
|
28,708 |
|
|
|
75,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 years later
|
|
|
7,251 |
|
|
|
8,677 |
|
|
|
11,558 |
|
|
|
11,995 |
|
|
|
16,208 |
|
|
|
30,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 years later
|
|
|
6,261 |
|
|
|
8,646 |
|
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
11,697 |
|
|
|
16,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 years later
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
7,952 |
|
|
|
10,303 |
|
|
|
12,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 years later
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
|
|
10,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 years later
|
|
|
5,813 |
|
|
|
7,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 years later
|
|
|
5,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative redundancy (deficiency) on net reserves
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
(2,155 |
) |
|
|
(6,915 |
) |
|
|
(28,164 |
) |
|
|
(36,643 |
) |
|
|
(29,040 |
) |
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative amount of net liability paid through December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year later
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
10,514 |
|
|
|
15,406 |
|
|
|
17,873 |
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
|
|
31,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 years later
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
6,057 |
|
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
9,616 |
|
|
|
15,865 |
|
|
|
28,577 |
|
|
|
35,642 |
|
|
|
48,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 years later
|
|
|
2,906 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
|
|
7,443 |
|
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
11,060 |
|
|
|
22,750 |
|
|
|
38,290 |
|
|
|
55,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 years later
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
6,034 |
|
|
|
8,991 |
|
|
|
9,086 |
|
|
|
13,558 |
|
|
|
24,131 |
|
|
|
47,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 years later
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
8,479 |
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
|
13,646 |
|
|
|
25,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 years later
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
9,320 |
|
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
14,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 years later
|
|
|
4,793 |
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
10,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 years later
|
|
|
5,266 |
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
9,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 years later
|
|
|
5,266 |
|
|
|
7,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 years later
|
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves December 31
|
|
|
8,288 |
|
|
|
8,869 |
|
|
|
10,793 |
|
|
|
12,860 |
|
|
|
14,348 |
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
47,734 |
|
|
|
69,621 |
|
|
|
115,043 |
|
|
|
184,040 |
|
|
|
233,978 |
|
Ceded Reserves
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
27,189 |
|
|
|
89,657 |
|
|
|
109,543 |
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
137,583 |
|
|
|
160,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Reserves
|
|
|
$8,294 |
|
|
$ |
8,914 |
|
|
$ |
11,572 |
|
|
$ |
14,701 |
|
|
$ |
20,413 |
|
|
|
$50,509 |
|
|
$ |
137,391 |
|
|
$ |
179,164 |
|
|
$ |
230,104 |
|
|
$ |
321,623 |
|
|
|
$394,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Only years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and
2005 include the consolidated values of American Safety RRG. |
72
Investments
The Companys investment portfolio is managed to maximize
total economic return, with due consideration for the
preservation of principal, operating income targets and the
Companys overall asset/liability strategy.
Our investment portfolio is managed by an independent,
nationally recognized investment management company that manages
our investment portfolio pursuant to the investment policies and
guidelines established by our Board of Directors. We have
investment policies which limit the maximum duration and
maturity of individual securities within the portfolio and set
target levels for average duration and maturity of the entire
portfolio. The maturity structure and duration target for our
investment portfolio takes into account the need to manage a
part of the portfolio to produce cash flow to cover operational
needs while allowing flexibility to manage our assets. Our
investment guidelines limit the percentage of our portfolio that
is permitted to be invested in any one market sector. At
December 31, 2005, equity securities represented 20.0% of
our prior year-end GAAP shareholders equity, the maximum
percentage permitted by our investment guidelines. The
guidelines further limit the amount that may be invested by
issuer quality rating. Additionally, we use specific criteria to
judge the credit quality and liquidity of our investments and
use a variety of credit rating services to monitor these
criteria. In conjunction with our investment policy, guidelines
and strategy, we have invested predominantly in investment grade
fixed income securities. Our investment portfolio consists
primarily of government and government agency securities and
high quality marketable corporate securities which are rated
investment grade or better. We also invest in equity securities
that track the S&P 500. At December 31, 2005, we had
$3.5 million invested in dividend paying preferred stocks
to increase our investment yield.
At December 31, 2004, December 31, 2005, and
March 31, 2006, our cash and invested assets totaled
approximately $353.9 million, $438.8 million and
$446.3 million, respectively, and were classified as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
Type of Investment |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and Short-Term Investments
|
|
$ |
50,742 |
|
|
$ |
50,742 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
Fixed Income Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
|
66,221 |
|
|
|
65,887 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
States of the U.S. and Political Subdivisions of the States
|
|
|
31,324 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
96,802 |
|
|
|
97,244 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
90,742 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Income Securities
|
|
|
286,057 |
|
|
|
284,940 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
15,081 |
|
|
|
14,002 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
353,885 |
|
|
$ |
351,689 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
Type of Investment |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and Short-Term Investments
|
|
$ |
48,617 |
|
|
$ |
48,617 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Fixed Income Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
|
85,976 |
|
|
|
86,740 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
States of the U.S. and Political Subdivisions of the States
|
|
|
64,628 |
|
|
|
64,740 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
130,469 |
|
|
|
132,992 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
83,784 |
|
|
|
84,764 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Income Securities
|
|
|
364,857 |
|
|
|
369,236 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
25,313 |
|
|
|
23,484 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
438,787 |
|
|
$ |
441,337 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and Short-Term Investments
|
|
$ |
46,239 |
|
|
$ |
46,239 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
Fixed Income Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
|
82,551 |
|
|
|
84,432 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
States of the U.S. and Political Subdivisions of the States
|
|
|
65,716 |
|
|
|
66,966 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
140,933 |
|
|
|
145,216 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
81,341 |
|
|
|
83,214 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Income Securities
|
|
|
370,541 |
|
|
|
379,828 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
29,564 |
|
|
|
27,170 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
446,344 |
|
|
$ |
453,237 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of our bond portfolio, classified by rating, as
of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and March 31, 2006 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
S&Ps/Moodys Rating(1) |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
AAA/Aaa (including U.S. Treasuries of $40,056)
|
|
$ |
190,476 |
|
|
$ |
189,941 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
% |
AA/Aa
|
|
|
15,083 |
|
|
|
16,757 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
A/A
|
|
|
69,487 |
|
|
|
65,221 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
BBB/Baa
|
|
|
11,011 |
|
|
|
13,021 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
286,057 |
|
|
$ |
284,940 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
S&Ps/Moodys Rating(1) |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
AAA/Aaa (including U.S. Treasuries of $46,076)
|
|
$ |
276,625 |
|
|
$ |
279,883 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
% |
AA/Aa
|
|
|
16,542 |
|
|
|
16,644 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
A/A
|
|
|
60,718 |
|
|
|
61,556 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
BBB/Baa
|
|
|
8,346 |
|
|
|
8,374 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Less than
BBB/Baa(2)
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
364,857 |
|
|
$ |
369,236 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
S&Ps/Moodys Rating(1) |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
AAA/Aaa (including U.S. Treasuries of $45,171)
|
|
$ |
264,618 |
|
|
$ |
271,404 |
|
|
|
71.4 |
% |
AA/Aa
|
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
A/A
|
|
|
85,633 |
|
|
|
87,863 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
BBB/Baa
|
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Less than
BBB/Baa(2)
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
370,541 |
|
|
$ |
379,828 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Ratings are assigned by S&P or, if no S&P rating is
available, by Moodys Investors Service Inc. |
|
(2) |
The BB rated securities were investment grade rated at the time
of investment; they mature in 2006. |
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (the
NAIC) has a security rating system by which it
assigns investments to classes called NAIC
designations that are used by insurers when preparing
their annual financial statements. The NAIC assigns designations
to publicly traded as well as privately placed securities. The
designations assigned by the NAIC range from class 1 to
class 6, with a rating in class 1 being the highest
quality. As of December 31, 2005, the majority of our
portfolio was invested in securities rated in class 1 or
class 2 by the NAIC, which are considered investment grade.
The weighted average maturity of our bond portfolio at
December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, was
4.4 years. The maturity distribution of our bond portfolio,
as of December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006, based on
stated maturity dates with no prepayment assumptions, was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Amortized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Amortized | |
Maturity |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
35,834 |
|
|
$ |
36,205 |
|
|
$ |
3,873 |
|
|
$ |
3,475 |
|
Due from one to five years
|
|
|
107,332 |
|
|
|
108,951 |
|
|
|
119,651 |
|
|
|
122,376 |
|
Due from five to ten years
|
|
|
53,865 |
|
|
|
54,521 |
|
|
|
76,431 |
|
|
|
78,784 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
37,357 |
|
|
|
36,567 |
|
|
|
29,652 |
|
|
|
29,978 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
130,469 |
|
|
|
132,992 |
|
|
|
140,934 |
|
|
|
145,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
364,857 |
|
|
$ |
369,236 |
|
|
$ |
370,541 |
|
|
$ |
379,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our mortgage-backed securities are subject to risks associated
with the variable prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans.
75
Our Non-Subsidiary Affiliate
Enacted in 1986, the Risk Retention Act of 1986 (the Risk
Retention Act) allowed companies with specialized
liability insurance needs not available in the standard
insurance market to create a new type of entity called a risk
retention group. We assisted in the formation of American Safety
RRG in 1988 in order to establish a U.S. insurance company
to market and underwrite specialty environmental coverages. The
advantage of writing policies through a risk retention group is
that it is permitted to write policies without having to qualify
to do so in each state.
American Safety RRG is not owned by us, but by its insureds, and
is managed by ASI Services. American Safety RRG is authorized to
write liability insurance in all 50 states as a result of
the Risk Retention Act and is licensed by the Vermont Department
of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Healthcare Administration
(the Vermont Department) under Title 8 of the
Vermont Statutes Annotated (the Vermont Captive Act)
as a stock captive insurance company. Presently, five of our
directors are also directors of American Safety RRG: David V.
Brueggen, William O. Mauldin, Jr., Thomas W. Mueller, Cody
W. Birdwell and Stephen R. Crim. The directors of American
Safety RRG are elected annually by the shareholders/insureds of
American Safety RRG.
We transferred our book of environmental insurance business to
American Safety RRG in 1988 to allow us to write that insurance
on a domestic basis. Our insurance subsidiaries participate in
the ongoing business of American Safety RRG through a pooling
agreement (whereby we retain 75% of the premiums and risk), and
write other environmental coverages.
In December 2003, the FASB revised Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which requires the
consolidation of the financial statements of American Safety RRG
into our financial statements. See Note 1(n) to our
consolidated financial statements herein for more information
relating to this matter. As a result, the financial information
presented herein, unless specifically noted, includes balances
of American Safety RRG.
Insurance Services
ASI Services, directly and through its subsidiaries, provides
business development, underwriting, accounting, program
management, brokerage, claims administration, marketing and
administrative services to our U.S. insurance operations
and our non-subsidiary risk retention group affiliate. ASI
Services has developed many of our primary insurance and
reinsurance programs. Since 1990, ASI Services has served as the
program manager for American Safety RRG, providing it with
program management, underwriting, loss control, marketing and
accounting services pursuant to guidelines and procedures
established by the Board of Directors of American Safety RRG.
ASI Services provides a number of services to our two
U.S. insurance subsidiaries and to American Safety RRG.
These services include:
|
|
|
|
|
business development services for developing new producer
relationships and new business opportunities; |
|
|
|
program management services for the overall management and
administration of a program; |
|
|
|
underwriting services for evaluating individual risks or classes
of risk; |
|
|
|
reinsurance services for placing reinsurance for a program; |
|
|
|
loss control services for evaluating the risks posed by a
particular class of risk, as well as the ability of insureds to
control their losses; |
|
|
|
claims administration services for the prompt reporting and
handling of claims, and the supervision of claims adjusters and
TPAs; |
|
|
|
marketing services for designing and placing advertisements and
other marketing materials, as well as marketing insurance
programs to producers; and |
76
|
|
|
|
|
administrative services, including policy and endorsement
issuance, data processing, billing, collecting and reporting
premiums, producing financial reports and paying claims. |
Regulatory Environment
|
|
|
Insurance Regulation Generally |
Our insurance operations are subject to regulation under
applicable insurance statutes of the jurisdictions or states in
which each subsidiary is domiciled and writes insurance.
Insurance regulations are intended to provide safeguards for
policyholders rather than to protect shareholders of insurance
companies or their holding companies.
The nature and extent of state regulation varies from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but typically involves prior
approval of the acquisition of control of an insurance company
or of any company controlling an insurance company, regulation
of certain transactions entered into by an insurance company
with an affiliate, approval of premium rates for lines of
insurance, standards of solvency and minimum amounts of capital
and surplus which must be maintained, limitations on types and
amounts of investments, restrictions on the size of risks which
may be insured by a single company, deposits of securities for
the benefit of policyholders and reports with respect to
financial condition and other matters. In addition, state
regulatory examiners perform periodic examinations of insurance
companies. American Safety Casualty, American Safety Indemnity
and American Safety RRG are all subject to examination by state
regulatory examiners every three years, and the last state
regulatory examination for each entity occurred in 2005, 2003
and 2003, respectively. No exams are currently ongoing.
Although the federal government does not directly regulate the
business of insurance in the U.S., federal initiatives often
affect the insurance business in a variety of ways. The
insurance regulatory structure has also been subject to scrutiny
in recent years by the NAIC, federal and state legislative
bodies and state regulatory authorities. Various new regulatory
standards have been adopted and proposed in recent years. The
development of standards to ensure the maintenance of
appropriate levels of statutory surplus by insurers has been a
matter of particular concern to insurance regulatory
authorities. The statutory surplus is the amount
remaining after all liabilities, including loss reserves, are
subtracted from all admitted assets and determined in accordance
with SAP.
Our Bermuda subsidiaries that conduct reinsurance business,
American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance, are subject to
regulation under The Insurance Act 1978, as amended, of Bermuda
and related regulations (the Bermuda Act), which
provide that no person shall conduct insurance business
(including reinsurance) in or from Bermuda unless registered as
an insurer under the Bermuda Act by the Supervisor of Insurance
(the Supervisor).
The Bermuda Act requires, among other things, Bermuda insurance
companies to meet and maintain certain standards of solvency, to
file periodic reports in accordance with the Bermuda Statutory
Accounting Rules, to produce annual audited financial statements
and to maintain a minimum level of statutory capital and
surplus. In general, the regulation of insurers in Bermuda
relies heavily upon the auditors, directors and managers of the
Bermuda insurer, each of which must certify that the insurer
meets the solvency capital requirements of the Bermuda Act.
Furthermore, the Supervisor is granted powers to supervise,
investigate and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies.
Neither American Safety Insurance, American Safety Re nor
American Safety Assurance are registered or licensed as an
insurance company in any state or jurisdiction in the U.S.
As a Bermuda insurance holding company, we do not do business in
the U.S. Our two U.S. insurance subsidiaries
operations are subject to state regulation where each is
domiciled and where each writes insurance.
77
We acquired American Safety Casualty, a U.S. insurance
subsidiary domiciled in Delaware, in 1993. American Safety
Casualty is licensed as a property and casualty insurer in
48 states and the District of Columbia. American Safety
Casualty is subject to regulation and examination by the
Delaware Insurance Department and the other states in which it
is an admitted insurer. The Delaware Insurance Department
examines American Safety Casualty on a triennial basis. The
insurance laws of Delaware place restrictions on a change of
control of American Safety Insurance as result of our ownership
of American Safety Casualty. Under Delaware law, no person may
obtain 10% or more of our voting securities without the prior
approval of the Delaware Insurance Department.
American Safety Casualty, as a licensed insurer, is subject to
state regulation of rates and policy forms in the various states
in which its direct premiums are written. Under these
regulations, a licensed insurer may be required to file and
obtain prior approval of its policy form and the rates that are
charged to insureds. American Safety Casualty is also required
to participate in state insolvency funds, or shared markets,
which are designed to protect insureds or insurers that become
unable to pay claims due to an insurers insolvency.
Assessments made against insurers participating in these funds
are usually based on direct premiums written by participating
insurers, as a percentage of total direct premiums written of
all participating insurers. Premiums Written are
those premiums written, whether or not earned, during a time
period.
We acquired American Safety Indemnity, a U.S. insurance
subsidiary domiciled in Oklahoma, in 2000. American Safety
Indemnity is currently licensed or approved as an excess and
surplus lines insurer in 40 states and the District of
Columbia. American Safety Indemnity is subject to examination by
the Oklahoma Insurance Department and the other states in which
it is approved as an excess and surplus lines insurer. The
Oklahoma Insurance Department examines American Safety Indemnity
on a triennial basis. The insurance laws of Oklahoma place
restrictions on a change of control of American Safety Insurance
as a result of our ownership of American Safety Indemnity. Under
Oklahoma law, no person may obtain 10% or more of our voting
securities without the prior approval of the Oklahoma Insurance
Department.
The premium rates of American Safety Indemnity, as an excess and
surplus lines insurer, are not filed and approved with the
various state insurance departments, but certain requirements
regarding the types of insurance written by excess and surplus
lines insurers still must be met. Generally, excess and surplus
lines insurers may only write coverage that is not available in
the admitted market and strict guidelines regarding
the coverages are set forth in various state statutes. Surplus
lines brokers are the licensed individuals or entities placing
coverage with excess and surplus lines insurers, and in most
states, the broker is responsible for the payment of surplus
lines taxes which are payable to the state in which the surplus
lines risk is located. Surplus lines insurers are exempt from
participation in state insolvency funds which are designed to
protect insureds if admitted insurers become
insolvent and are unable to pay claims. While American Safety
Indemnity is exempt from the majority of state regulatory
requirements, it must be approved to write the type
of insurance in the states where its surplus business lines
insurance is written. The Oklahoma Insurance Department retains
primary regulatory authority over American Safety Indemnity, as
a licensed and admitted insurance company in Oklahoma.
Additionally, American Safety Casualty and American Safety
Indemnity are required to comply with NAIC risk-based capital
(RBC) requirements. RBC is a method of measuring the
amount of capital appropriate for an insurance company to
support its overall business in light of its size and risk
profile. The ratio of a companys actual policyholder
surplus to its minimum capital requirements will determine
whether any state regulatory action is required. State
regulatory authorities use the RBC formula to identify insurance
companies which may be undercapitalized and may require further
regulatory attention.
|
|
|
Regulation of Our Non-Subsidiary Affiliate |
The Risk Retention Act facilitates the establishment of risk
retention groups to insure certain liability risks of its
members. The statute applies only to liability insurance and
does not permit coverage of personal risk liability or
workers compensation.
78
The Risk Retention Act and the Vermont Captive Act require that
each insured of American Safety RRG be a shareholder. Each
insured is required to purchase one share of American Safety
RRGs common stock upon acceptance as an insured. There is
no trading market for the shares of common stock of American
Safety RRG and each share is restricted as to transfer. If and
when a holder of American Safety RRG common stock ceases to be
an insured, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, that
holders share of common stock is automatically canceled
and that person is no longer a shareholder of American Safety
RRG. The ownership interests of members in a risk retention
group are considered to be exempt securities for purposes of the
registration provisions of the Securities Act and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)
and are likewise not considered securities for purposes of any
state securities law.
Congress intended under the Risk Retention Act that the primary
responsibility for regulating the financial condition of a risk
retention group would rest on the state in which the group is
licensed or chartered. American Safety RRG is subject to
regulation as a captive insurer under the insurance laws of
Vermont and, to a lesser extent, under the laws of each state in
which it does business. Any merger or acquisition of American
Safety RRG is subject to the prior written approval of the
commissioner of the Vermont Department. The Risk Retention Act
requires a risk retention group to provide a notice on each
insurance policy which it issues to the effect that (i) the
policy is issued by a risk retention group; (ii) the risk
retention group may not be subject to all of the insurance laws
and regulations of the state in which the policy is being
issued; and (iii) no state insurance insolvency guaranty
fund is available to the policies issued by the risk retention
group.
Additionally, American Safety RRG is also required to comply
with NAIC RBC requirements, as discussed above.
Harbour Village Development
In March 2000, our subsidiary Ponce Lighthouse Properties Inc.
and our general contracting subsidiary Rivermar Contracting
Company began development of Harbour Village, located in Ponce
Inlet, Florida, with 676 condominium units, a marina containing
142 boat slips, a par-3 golf course and beach club. We acquired
the Harbour Village property (comprising 173 acres) through
foreclosure in April 1999 from an individual to whom the Company
had extended a loan in order to satisfy the loan after it was in
default. Development of Harbour Village is substantially
complete and all of the condominium units and boat slips had
been sold and closed by the second quarter of 2005. We do not
plan to engage in any additional real estate development
activities. However, we are in the process of building a beach
club facility that we expect to be completed by the end of the
second quarter of 2006. There are two remaining employees that
focus on managing the remaining warranty claims on closed
condominium units and who oversee the beach club construction.
We have an accrual for the estimated completion cost for the
remainder of Harbour Village of $1.4 million.
79
Real estate income was $3.0 million in 2005,
$68.0 million in 2004 and $57.6 million in 2003. This
revenue was generated from the sales of condominium units and
boat slips at Harbour Village. We recognized revenue when a
closing occurred and title passed to the buyer. The following
chart shows the number of condominium units and boat slips that
were closed each year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Condominium Units
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Boat Slips
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate expenses were $2.4 million in 2005,
$55.5 million in 2004 and $54.0 million in 2003. The
majority of real estate expenses, including construction costs,
capitalized interest and commissions were recognized at the same
time as revenue. General and administrative expenses were
expensed as incurred.
Employees
At March 31, 2006, we employed 129 persons, none of whom
were represented by a labor union.
Properties
Our office is located at 44 Church Street, Hamilton, Bermuda,
and the telephone number is (441) 296-8560. The corporate
offices of our U.S. subsidiaries are located at 1845 The
Exchange, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, and the telephone number is
(770) 916-1908. The Company does not own either of these
properties, although see Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions.
80
MANAGEMENT
The executive officers, senior management and directors of
American Safety Insurance are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Stephen R. Crim
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(E) |
Joseph D. Scollo, Jr.
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
William C. Tepe
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Steven B. Mathis
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Vice President - Planning and Treasurer |
Ambuj Jain
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President - Planning and Operations Support |
Dorothy J. Giglio
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Secretary |
Pamela M. Moniz
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President - Finance |
Cody W. Birdwell
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Director and
Chairman(E)(F) |
David V. Brueggen
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director(A)(E)(N) |
Lawrence I. Geneen
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Director(C)(N) |
Frank D. Lackner
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Director(C)(F) |
William O. Mauldin, Jr.
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director(C)(N) |
Thomas W. Mueller
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director(E) |
William A. Robbie
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director(A)(E)(F) |
Jerome D. Weaver
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Director(A) |
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Audit Committee Member |
|
(C) |
|
Compensation Committee Member |
|
(E) |
|
Executive Committee Member |
|
(F) |
|
Finance Committee Member |
|
(N) |
|
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member |
Stephen R. Crim became President and Chief Executive
Officer of American Safety Insurance in January 2003 and became
President of American Safety Insurances insurance and
reinsurance operations in January 2002. Prior to becoming
President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Crim was
responsible for all of the Companys underwriting functions
since he joined American Safety Insurance in 1990. Previously,
Mr. Crim was employed in the underwriting department of
Aetna Casualty and Surety and The Hartford Insurance Co. between
1986 and 1990. Mr. Crim has over 19 years of
experience in the insurance industry.
Joseph D. Scollo, Jr. became Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2006.
Mr. Scollo served as Executive Vice President of American
Safety Insurance since January 2003 and served as Senior Vice
President - Operations since November 1998. Previously,
Mr. Scollo served as Senior Vice President -
Operations of United Coastal Insurance Company, New Britain,
Connecticut since 1989. Mr. Scollo has over 17 years
of experience in the insurance industry. Mr. Scollo holds a
certified public accountant certificate.
William C. Tepe became Chief Financial Officer of
American Safety Insurance in November 2005. Mr. Tepe joined
American Safety Insurance with over 24 years of experience
in accounting, financial reporting, financial planning and
corporate development. Prior to joining American Safety
Insurance, Mr. Tepe was the Chief Financial Officer for GAB
Robins Inc., an international insurance claims management and
adjusting company. Mr. Tepe has also been employed in
senior financial reporting and accounting positions within major
property and casualty insurance companies such as W. R. Berkley
Corp. and USF&G Corporation. Mr. Tepe is a certified
public accountant.
81
Steven B. Mathis became Vice President
Planning and Treasurer in November 2005. Previously, he served
as Chief Financial Officer of American Safety Insurance since
August 1998. He also served as American Safety Insurances
Controller from 1992 to 1998. Mr. Mathis has over
16 years accounting experience in the insurance industry
having held accounting positions with American Insurance
Managers, Inc. and American Security Group.
Ambuj Jain joined American Safety Insurance in 2004 and
is Vice President Planning and Operations Support.
Mr. Jain has over 20 years of marketing and operations
experience. Previously, he served as a consultant to the
Companys Executive Management Team since 1999 and as
Senior Vice President, Marketing and Planning for Resort
Condominiums International. Mr. Jain has also served as
Senior Manager with Deloitte Consulting, Partner with WorldMark
Group, Inc., and a marketing professor at Southern Methodist
University in Dallas.
Dorothy J. Giglio became Secretary of American Safety
Insurance in January 2005. Ms. Giglio joined American
Safety Insurance in August 1990 as the Office Manager and served
in that capacity until 1993. Ms. Giglio returned to the
Company in 1996 as the Office Manager and was subsequently
promoted to Director of Special Projects in 2000. In 2004, she
was named Director of Operations Support Group.
Pamela M. Moniz joined American Safety Insurance in April
2005 and is Vice President Finance. Ms. Moniz
has over 23 years of experience in the accounting field.
From 2002 until joining American Safety Insurance,
Ms. Moniz was Group Accountant for Goshawk Insurance
Holdings, a member of the London Stock Exchange. From 2000 to
2002, Ms. Moniz was Senior Statutory Accountant for
SAFECOs property and casualty companies.
Cody W. Birdwell has served as a director of American
Safety Insurance since 1986 and as Chairman of the Board of
Directors since 2004. Mr. Birdwell has been president of
Houston Sunbelt Communities, L.C. in Houston, Texas, since 1993,
which is engaged in subdivision and mobile home community
development and sales. Mr. Birdwell has over 18 years
of experience in general and environmental contracting.
David V. Brueggen has served as a director of American
Safety Insurance since 1986. Mr. Brueggen is senior vice
president of finance of Anson Industries, Inc. in Melrose Park,
Illinois, which is engaged in drywall, acoustical and foam
insulation contracting. Mr. Brueggen has been employed by
Anson Industries, Inc. since 1982. Previously, he was an audit
manager with an international public accounting firm for ten
years. Mr. Brueggen is a certified public accountant.
Lawrence I. Geneen has served as a director of American
Safety Insurance since 2003. Mr. Geneen is president and
owner of an insurance risk management and strategic consulting
firm in Scarsdale, New York. From 1999 to 2001,
Mr. Geneen was executive vice president and chief operating
officer of American Management Association in New York, New
York, which is engaged in management training and publishing.
From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Geneen was a managing director of
Marsh & McLennan, Inc. in New York where he was
responsible for global sales and client management leadership in
its insurance brokerage business. From 1992 to 1997,
Mr. Geneen was a managing principal and owner of Johnson
and Higgins and from 1974 to 1992 Mr. Geneen was employed
in a number of executive sales positions and management
positions in its insurance brokerage business. Mr. Geneen
has over 39 years of experience in the insurance industry.
Frank D. Lackner has been a director of the Company since
2004. Since 2001, Mr. Lackner has been a managing director
with Torsiello Capital Partners LLC in New York, New York,
engaged in providing investment banking and financial advisory
services to the global insurance and financial services
industry. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Lackner was co-founder and
president of RiskContinuum, Inc., an online reinsurance exchange
start-up venture
established to facilitate reinsurance opportunities for
insurance brokers, corporate risk managers, insurance and
reinsurance companies, which has ceased operations. From 1993 to
1997, he was a vice president with Insurance Partners L.P., a
private equity investment partnership specializing in financial
services. From 1992 to 1993, Mr. Lackner was an assistant
underwriter with Centre Reinsurance Companies, a subsidiary of
Zurich Financial Services, engaged in finite risk
82
reinsurance and insurance transactions. Prior to joining Centre
Re, Mr. Lackner was an investment banking analyst in the
insurance group at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Securities Corp. from 1990 to 1992. Mr. Lackner has over
15 years of experience in the insurance and reinsurance
industry.
William O. Mauldin, Jr. has served as a director of
American Safety Insurance since 1986. Mr. Mauldin has been
president of Midwest Materials Co. in Springfield, Missouri,
since 1975, which is engaged in insulation and cold storage
contracting. Mr. Mauldin has over 37 years of
experience in the construction industry.
Thomas W. Mueller has served as a director of American
Safety Insurance since 1986. Mr. Mueller has been vice
president of Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. in
Louisville, Kentucky, since 1975, which is engaged in industrial
insulation and asbestos and sound abatement. Mr. Mueller
has over 29 years of experience in the construction
industry.
William A. Robbie began serving as a director of the
Company in 2005. Mr. Robbie has provided financial advisory
services to the insurance industry through his own firm since
December 2004. From November 2002 to November 2004,
Mr. Robbie was the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Platinum Underwriters Holdings Ltd., a
property and casualty reinsurance company in Bermuda. From
August 2002 to November 2002, Mr. Robbie held the same
position for St. Paul Re. From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Robbie
held various positions with XL Capital Ltd. and its subsidiaries
including Executive Vice President - Global Financial
Services, Senior Vice President - Treasurer and Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial & Administrative
Officer of XL Re, Ltd. From 1977 to 1997 Mr. Robbie held
executive financial positions with Prudential AARP Operations,
Continental Insurance Companies, Monarch Life Insurance and
Aetna Life and Casualty. Previously, Mr. Robbie was an
auditor with an international public accounting firm for three
years. He is a certified public accountant. Mr. Robbie has
over 27 years of experience in the insurance and
reinsurance industry.
Jerome D. Weaver has served as a director of American
Safety Insurance since 2001. Mr. Weaver has been chief
executive officer of Specialty Systems, Inc. in Indianapolis,
Indiana, since 1996, which is engaged in general construction
and asbestos abatement. Mr. Weaver has been employed by
Specialty Systems, Inc. since 1989 and has over 14 years of
experience in the construction industry.
Mr. Steven L. Groot is expected to be nominated and elected as a
director of the Company at its Annual General Meeting of
Shareholders on June 19, 2006. Mr. Groot, age 56, served in
various positions at Allstate Insurance Company in Northbrook,
Illinois from 1970 to 2002, most recently as President of Direct
Distribution and e-Commerce and as a member of its board of
directors. Mr. Groot has over 35 years of experience in the
insurance industry. Mr. Groot presently owns 2,000 Common
Shares.
Board of Directors and Committees of the Board of
Directors
The Companys Board of Directors consists of nine directors
and is divided into three groups, each of whom serves a
three-year term. Messrs. Birdwell, Lackner and Mueller
serve as directors until the 2006 annual meeting of
shareholders. Messrs. Mauldin, Weaver and Robbie serve as
directors until the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders.
Messrs. Brueggen, Crim and Geneen serve as directors until
the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
The Board of Directors has established five standing committees:
the audit committee; the compensation committee; the executive
committee; the finance committee; and the nominating and
corporate governance committee.
The audit committee is comprised of independent directors and
reviews the scope of the Companys audit, recommends to the
Board of Directors the engagement of the independent registered
public accounting firm and reviews that firms reports. The
audit committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy
of which is available on the Companys website
www.americansafetyinsurance.com in the Corporate
Governance section. The current members of the audit
committee are Messrs. Brueggen, Robbie (chairman) and
Weaver. The Board of Directors has determined that each member
of the audit committee is financially literate. The Board of
Directors has determined that Mr. Robbie is qualified as an
83
audit committee financial expert within the meaning
of the SEC regulations, and that he, therefore, meets the
requirement under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards
that at least one member of the audit committee have accounting
or related financial management expertise.
The compensation committee is comprised of independent directors
and recommends to the Board of Directors matters regarding
executive compensation and stock options. The compensation
committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a copy of
which is available on the Companys website
www.americansafetyinsurance.com in the Corporate
Governance section. The current members of the
compensation committee are Messrs. Geneen (chairman),
Lackner and Mauldin.
The executive committee exercises the general power and
authority of the Board of Directors between meetings of the
Board of Directors. The current members of the executive
committee are Messrs. Birdwell (chairman), Brueggen, Crim,
Mueller and Robbie.
The finance committee is comprised of independent directors and
is responsible for recommending portfolio allocations to the
Board of Directors, approving the Companys guidelines
which provide standards to ensure portfolio liquidity and
safety, approving investment managers and custodians for
portfolio assets and considering other matters regarding the
financial affairs of the Company. The current members of the
finance committee are Messrs. Birdwell, Lackner (chairman)
and Robbie.
The nominating and corporate governance committee is comprised
of independent directors. The committee has as its purposes
identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board
of Directors and recommending to the Board of Directors
candidates for election or reelection as directors; monitoring
and recommending corporate governance and other Board of
Directors practices; and overseeing performance reviews of the
Board of Directors, its committees and the individual members of
the Board of Directors. The committee operates pursuant to a
written charter, which is available on the Companys
website www.americansafetyinsurance.com in the
Corporate Governance section. The current members of
the nominating and corporate governance committee are
Messrs. Brueggen (chairman), Geneen and Mauldin.
Shareholders may obtain a printed copy without charge of any of
the committee charters referenced above upon written request to
the Secretary of the Company, 44 Church Street, Hamilton
HM HX Bermuda.
Executive Sessions
The independent directors meet in executive sessions, at which
only independent directors are present, on a regularly scheduled
basis at each meeting of the Board of Directors and as needed.
Mr. Birdwell presides over the executive sessions of the
Board of Directors.
Independence
The New York Stock Exchange listing standards require listed
companies to have a Board of Directors with at least a majority
of independent directors. The Board of Directors has determined
that each current director and each nominee for election, with
the exception of Mr. Crim (who is currently employed by the
Company), qualifies as an independent director. In determining
each directors independence, the Board of Directors did
consider that Messrs. Brueggen, Mueller and Birdwell are
officers of American Safety RRG. This entity is consolidated
with the Company for accounting purposes but, for purposes of
independence analysis, is considered an affiliate of the Company
rather than a subsidiary of the Company. The Board of Directors
has determined that this relationship does not prevent these
directors from being considered independent.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board of Directors has approved a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics in accordance with rules of the SEC and the New York
Stock Exchange listing standards applicable to all directors,
officers and employees, including the principal executive
officers, principal financial officers, principal and senior
84
accounting officers or controller, or person performing similar
functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is intended
to provide guidance to directors and management to assure
compliance with law and promote ethical behavior. The
Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available
on its website www.americansafetyinsurance.com in the
Corporate Governance section. Shareholders may
request a printed copy of the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics upon written request to the Secretary of the Company,
44 Church Street, Hamilton HM HX Bermuda.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Company is committed to having sound corporate governance
practices, and the Board of Directors has adopted Corporate
Governance Guidelines that provide a framework for the
governance of the Company. The Board of Directors reviews these
guidelines periodically and monitors developments in the area of
corporate governance. The Companys Corporate Governance
Guidelines are available on its website
www.americansafetyinsurance.com in the Corporate
Governance section. Shareholders may request a printed
copy without charge upon written request to the Secretary of the
Company, 44 Church Street, Hamilton HM HX Bermuda.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The compensation committee, consisting of Messrs. Geneen,
Lackner and Mauldin, is made up of non-employee directors who
have never served as executive officers of the Company. None of
the Companys executive officers serve on the Board of
Directors of any entity whose directors or officers serve on the
Companys compensation committee.
Compensation of Directors
Pursuant to the 1998 Director Stock Award Plan,
non-employee directors are awarded an annual retainer in the
form of the Common Shares having a fair market value of $30,000.
The Common Shares are granted to the directors who are serving
as directors immediately after each annual general meeting of
shareholders and the fair market value of the Common Shares is
determined as of that date. The Common Shares vest as of the day
immediately preceding the next annual general meeting of
shareholders following the date of grant.
Non-employee directors also are paid $1,000 per day for
attendance at each meeting of the Companys Board of
Directors and the committees of the Board of Directors on which
they serve. In addition, each of the Companys directors
also serves on the Board of Directors of American Safety
Holdings Corp. and is paid $1,000 per day for attendance at
meetings of that Board of Directors and the committees thereof
on which they serve. Directors are also reimbursed for their
reasonable travel expenses in connection with their service.
85
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information regarding the annual
compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and the three
other executive officers of the Company who received a combined
salary and bonus in excess of $100,000 (the Named
Executive Officers) for services rendered to the Company
during the years indicated:
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Awards | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted | |
|
Underlying | |
|
|
Name and Principal |
|
|
|
Base | |
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Options | |
|
All Other | |
Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Awards | |
|
Granted | |
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stephen R. Crim
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
Chief Executive |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
Officer and
President(2) |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
|
$ |
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
Joseph D. Scollo, Jr.
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
270,000 |
|
|
$ |
135,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,400 |
|
|
Executive Vice |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
President
Operations(3) |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
239,583 |
|
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
William C. Tepe
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
40,157 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven B. Mathis
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
173,250 |
|
|
$ |
48,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,479 |
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
166,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
Planning and
Treasurer(5) |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents amounts accrued for contributions by us with respect
to our 401(k) plan. |
|
(2) |
Mr. Crims Other Annual Compensation for
2005 consists of $20,000 for annual insurance premiums paid by
the Company. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Scollo became Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer, effective January 1, 2006.
Mr. Scollos Other Annual Compensation for
2005 consists of $15,000 for annual insurance premiums paid by
the Company. |
|
(4) |
Mr. Tepe became Chief Financial Officer, effective
November 14, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Mr. Mathis became Vice President - Planning and
Treasurer, effective November 14, 2005. |
Stock Option Grants, Exercises and Year-End Values
The following table sets forth information regarding stock
option grants, exercises and year-end values as of
December 31, 2005 by the Named Executive Officers
identified in the Summary Compensation Table above. For more
information, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial
statements (audited) herein.
Option Grants in 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed Annual | |
|
|
of | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
Rates of Stock Price | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Granted | |
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation for Option | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
to | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Term(1) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees | |
|
Price per | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted | |
|
in 2005 | |
|
Share | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
William C. Tepe
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
$ |
16.18 |
|
|
|
11/14/15 |
|
|
$ |
254,388 |
|
|
$ |
644,669 |
|
Steven B. Mathis
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
16.72 |
|
|
|
9/22/15 |
|
|
$ |
52,576 |
|
|
$ |
133,237 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The dollar amounts calculated represent hypothetical values that
may be realized upon exercise of the options immediately prior
to the expiration of their term, assuming that the stock price
on the date of grant appreciates at the specified annual rates
of appreciation, compounded annually over the term of the
option. These calculations are based on rules promulgated by the
SEC. |
86
The following table sets forth information regarding options
exercised in 2005 and the number and value of exercised and
unexercised stock options held as of December 31, 2005 by
the Named Executive Officers identified in the Summary
Compensation Table above.
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2005 and Year-End Option
Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at Year-End | |
|
Options at Year-End(1) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stephen R. Crim
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
127,000 |
|
|
|
101,000 |
|
|
$ |
958,440 |
|
|
$ |
794,570 |
|
Joseph D. Scollo, Jr.
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
$ |
434,110 |
|
|
$ |
420,780 |
|
William C. Tepe
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
Steven B. Mathis
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
$ |
326,100 |
|
|
$ |
131,860 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The dollar value was calculated determining the difference
between the fair market value of the underlying securities at
December 31, 2005 ($16.74 per share) and the exercise
price of the options. |
Stock Option Plan
The Company maintains the 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as
amended (the Incentive Plan), which was approved by
shareholders and is intended to further the interests of the
Company and its shareholders by attracting, retaining and
motivating officers, employees, consultants and advisors to
participate in the long-term development of the Company through
ownership of common shares. The Incentive Plan provides for the
grant of stock options, which may be either non-qualified stock
options or incentive stock options for tax purposes.
The Incentive Plan is administered by the compensation committee
of the Companys Board of Directors. The compensation
committee is authorized to determine the terms and conditions of
all option grants, subject to the limitations set forth in the
Incentive Plan. In accordance with the terms of the Incentive
Plan, the option price per share will not be less than the fair
market value of the common shares on the date of grant, the term
of any options granted may be no longer than ten years and there
may or may not be a vesting period before any recipient may
exercise any of those options. The rights of recipients
receiving these stock options generally vest equally over three
years, beginning with the first anniversary date of grant, and
expiring ten years from the date of grant. As of
December 31, 2005, there were 430,627 remaining options
available to be granted under the Incentive Plan.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
The compensation of Mr. Stephen R. Crim, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is determined pursuant
to the principles noted above and specific consideration is
given to Mr. Crims responsibilities and his
contribution to the Companys operating results. In 2005,
Mr. Crims annual base salary was $360,000, in
accordance with a three-year employment agreement entered into
with the Company in 2005. This contract also provides for an
annual base salary of $380,000 in 2006 and $400,000 in 2007.
This contract also provides for an annual discretionary bonus,
and other customary executive benefits including stock options
and health insurance. Pursuant to the contract, an annual
discretionary bonus is the amount as may be determined by the
Board of Directors, in its discretion. No specific performance
criteria or objectives are utilized in making this
determination. However, Mr. Crims annual discretionary
bonus historically has been related to the achievement of goals
and objectives established by the compensation committee under
the Companys Incentive Compensation Plan. Mr. Crim
received a bonus of $180,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
87
Other Employment Agreements
Joseph D. Scollo, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company, entered into a three-year
employment agreement with the Company in March 2005, which
provided for an annual base salary of $270,000 in 2005, $285,000
in 2006 and $300,000 in 2007, an annual discretionary bonus, and
other customary executive benefits including stock options and
health insurance. Mr. Scollos annual discretionary
bonus historically has been granted pursuant to the criteria
established by the compensation committee under the Incentive
Compensation Plan. Mr. Scollo entered into an amendment to
his employment agreement on January 1, 2006, reflecting his
new position and duties as Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer. As part of that amendment,
Mr. Scollos annual base salary was increased to
$325,000 in 2006 and 2007.
William C. Tepe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, entered
into an employment agreement with the Company in November 2005
which will expire at the end of 2007. This agreement provides
for a base annual salary of $300,000 in 2006, which may be
increased pursuant to a merit increase at each annual
performance evaluation, beginning April 1, 2007.
Mr. Tepe is eligible to receive an annual discretionary
bonus, which has historically been granted pursuant to the
criteria established by the compensation committee under the
Incentive Compensation Plan, and other customary executive
benefits including stock options and health insurance.
88
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
Common Shares of American Safety Insurance owned as of
June 19, 2006 (i) by each of our directors,
(ii) by each of our Named Executive Officers identified in
the Summary Compensation Table above, (iii) by each person
who beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding Common
Shares and (iv) by all directors and executive officers of
American Safety Insurance as a group. Except as otherwise
indicated, each person listed below has sole voting and
investment power with respect to those Common Shares.
Common Shares beneficially owned include shares that may be
acquired pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options
that are exercisable within 60 days of June 19, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares that | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May be | |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Acquired | |
|
Percentage | |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Common Shares | |
|
Within 60 Days | |
|
Ownership | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas W. Mueller(1)
|
|
|
329,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
David V. Brueggen(2)
|
|
|
294,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
William O. Mauldin, Jr.(3)
|
|
|
235,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
Cody W. Birdwell(4)
|
|
|
203,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
Jerome D. Weaver
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Frank L. Lackner
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
William A. Robbie
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Lawrence I. Geneen
|
|
|
2,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven L. Groot
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Stephen R. Crim(5)
|
|
|
84,914 |
|
|
|
127,000 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
Joseph D. Scollo, Jr.
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven B. Mathis
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William C. Tepe
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Frederick C. Treadway(6)
|
|
|
834,716 |
|
|
|
232,000 |
|
|
|
15.10 |
|
Walsh R.E., Ltd.(7)
|
|
|
475,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
Royce and Associates(8)
|
|
|
422,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
Goldman Capital Management(9)
|
|
|
363,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)
|
|
|
1,167,882 |
|
|
|
228,000 |
|
|
|
19.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
Includes Common Shares held of record by The Mark C. Mueller
Trust for which Mr. Thomas W. Mueller is the sole trustee.
Mark C. Mueller is a brother of Thomas W. Mueller. Includes
160,000 Common Shares held of record by The Thomas W. Mueller
Trust for which Mark C. Mueller is the sole trustee. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes 291,218 Common Shares held of record by Anning-Johnson
Company, of which Mr. Brueggen is the Chief Financial
Officer. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes 226,074 Common Shares held of record by A.R.I.
Incorporated. Mr. Mauldin and his wife are the sole owners
of A.R.I. Incorporated. |
|
(4) |
Includes 98,250 Common Shares of record held by The Cody
Birdwell Family Limited Partnership, over which
Mr. Birdwell has sole voting power with respect to the
Common Shares. |
|
(5) |
Includes 83,340 Common Shares owned by his spouse and 144 Common
Shares held of record as custodian for a child. |
89
|
|
(6) |
Includes 644,027 Common Shares held of record by Treadway
Associates, L.P., a limited partnership owned by
Mr. Treadway and his children. Mr. Treadways
address is 9406 Promontory Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana 46236. |
|
(7) |
Includes 270,005 Common Shares held of record by
Walsh R.E., Ltd. Its address is 588 Washburn Road,
Tallmadge, Ohio 44278 according to a Schedule 13(d) as
filed with the SEC. Also includes Common Shares held of record
by individuals within the Walsh family or entities owned by
those individuals. |
|
(8) |
Its address is 1414 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York
10019 according to a Schedule 13(d) as filed with the SEC. |
|
(9) |
Its address is 220 East
42nd Street,
New York, New York, 10017 according to Schedule 13(d) as
filed with the SEC. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Messrs. Birdwell, Brueggen, Crim, Mauldin and Mueller,
members of the Companys Board of Directors, are also
directors of American Safety RRG, and Mr. Birdwell is
President and Chairman of the Board of American Safety RRG, a
non-subsidiary affiliate, which is managed by ASI Services, the
Companys principal U.S. program development,
underwriting and administrative services subsidiary, on a
fee-for-service basis. This entity is consolidated with the
Company for accounting purposes and, for purposes of
independence analysis, is considered an affiliate of the
Company. American Safety RRG is a stock captive insurance
company licensed in Vermont and is authorized to write liability
insurance in all 50 states as a result of the Risk
Retention Act. The directors of American Safety RRG are elected
annually by its shareholder/insureds.
Mark Mueller, the brother of Mr. Mueller, a member of the
Companys Board of Directors, serves as advisory director
of the Company.
ASI Services leases approximately 25,000 square feet of
office space in Atlanta, Georgia from a company that is owned by
Messrs. Crim, Mathis, Mueller and Scollo, all of whom are
officers or directors of the Company. The lease, which expires
August 31, 2007, provides for a base annual rent and a five
year option to extend (with a 4% annual increase during that
extension). ASI Services paid rent to the landlord of $533,093
in 2005. The Company believes that the terms of this lease are
at least as favorable as the terms that the subsidiary could
obtain from an unrelated third party.
90
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON SHARES
General
As of March 31, 2006, our authorized capital stock
consisted of 15 million common shares, par value
$.01 per share (the Common Shares), and
5 million preferred shares, par value $.01 per share
(the Preferred Shares).
Set forth below is a summary description of all of the material
terms of our capital stock. This description is qualified in its
entirety by reference to our Memorandum of Association and
Bye-Laws, a copy of each of which is filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Common Shares
The Common Shares offered hereby will be validly issued, fully
paid and nonassessable. There are no provisions of Bermuda law
or our Bye-Laws which impose any limitations on the rights of
shareholders to hold or vote Common Shares by reason of
those shareholders not being residents of Bermuda.
Our Common Shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol ASI. Under our Bye-Laws, the
registration of transfer of any of our shares may be suspended
at any time after appropriate notice has been given and for any
period (not exceeding 30 days in any year) as the Board of
Directors may determine. However, our listing agreement with the
New York Stock Exchange does not provide us with that right. As
a result, the Board of Directors does not expect to exercise
that right.
Dividend Rights. We do not anticipate paying cash
dividends on the Common Shares in the near future. In June 2003,
our Board of Directors decided to suspend paying dividends on
the Common Shares so that we could utilize the capital to take
advantage of improving premium rates in the property and
casualty insurance market. As an insurance holding company, our
ability to pay cash dividends to our shareholders depends, to a
significant degree, on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay
cash dividends to us. The jurisdictions in which we and our
subsidiaries are domiciled place limitations on the amount of
dividends or other distributions payable by insurance companies
in order to protect the solvency of the insurers. Further, in
connection with the issuance of trust preferred securities by
our subsidiaries for whom American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd. acts as parent guarantor, American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd. may not pay dividends on the Common Shares during
an event of default under the governing documents of those
transactions or if the issuing trust chooses to defer payment of
dividends on the trust preferred securities. Our current policy
is for our primary insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries to
retain their capital for growth and to not pay dividends on the
Common Shares for the foreseeable future.
Holders of Common Shares, however, will be entitled to receive
dividends ratably if, when and as declared by the Board of
Directors out of funds legally available therefor.
Voting Rights. Each holder of Common Shares is entitled
to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of our
shareholders, subject to the 9.5% voting limitation described
below. All matters, including the election of directors, voted
upon at any duly held shareholders meeting must be authorized by
a majority of the votes cast at the meeting by shareholders
represented in person or by proxy, except (i) approval of a
merger, consolidation or amalgamation, (ii) the sale, lease
or exchange of all or substantially all of our assets and
(iii) the amendment of certain provisions of the Bye-Laws,
which each require the approval of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding voting shares entitled to vote. In
addition, in the case of (i) and (ii), regulatory approval
from the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the Delaware Insurance
Department, the Oklahoma Insurance Department may be required
prior to taking that action. No further approval for any merger,
consolidation or amalgamation, other than the approval described
above, is required under applicable provisions of Bermuda law.
The Common Shares have non-cumulative voting rights, which means
that the holders of a majority of the Common Shares may elect
all of our directors and, in that event, the holders of the
remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors.
91
The Bye-Laws contain certain provisions that limit the voting
rights that may be exercised by certain holders of Common
Shares. The Bye-Laws provide that each holder of Common Shares
is entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a
vote of our shareholders, except that if, and so long as, the
Controlled Shares (as defined below) of any person constitutes
more than 9.5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, the
voting rights with respect to the Controlled Shares owned by
that person will be limited, in the aggregate, to a voting power
of 9.5% (the Maximum Percentage), other than the
voting rights of Frederick C. Treadway (one of our founding
shareholders) or Treadway Associates, L.P., a limited
partnership owned by Mr. Treadway and his children,
including their respective heirs, successors and assigns. In
addition, any amendment of the term Maximum
Percentage must be consented to by Mr. Treadway or
Treadway Associates, L.P. Controlled Shares means,
with respect to any person, (i) all of our shares directly,
indirectly or constructively owned by that person and
(ii) all of our shares directly, indirectly or beneficially
owned by that person within the meaning of Section 13(d) of
the Exchange Act (including any shares owned by a group of
persons, as so defined and including any shares that would
otherwise be excluded by the provisions of Section 13(d) of
the Exchange Act). Under these provisions, if, and so long as,
any person directly, indirectly or constructively owns
Controlled Shares having more than 9.5% of the total number of
votes exercisable in respect of all of our voting shares, the
voting rights attributable to those shares will be limited, in
the aggregate, to 9.5% of the total number of votes.
Preemptive Rights. No holder of our Common Shares will,
by reason only of those holdings, have any preemptive right to
subscribe to any additional issue of shares of any class or
series nor to any security convertible into those shares.
Preferred Shares
Pursuant to our Bye-Laws, our Board of Directors may by
resolution establish one or more series of preferred shares
having such number of shares, designations, relative voting
rights, dividend rates, liquidation and other rights,
preferences and limitations as may be fixed by the Board of
Directors without any further shareholder approval. These
rights, preferences and limitations as may be established could
also have the effect of impeding or discouraging the acquisition
of control of American Safety Insurance.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Bye-Laws
The Bye-Laws contain certain provisions that may be viewed as
making the acquisition of control of American Safety Insurance
more difficult. Specifically, our Bye-Laws:
|
|
|
|
|
require the prior resolution of the continuing
directors of our Board of Directors or the affirmative
vote of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding voting shares entitled to vote to
approve a business combination as described below
under Bye-Laws Restrictions on
Certain Business Combinations; |
|
|
|
require the affirmative vote of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding voting shares to amend, repeal or
adopt any provision inconsistent with the foregoing provision of
the Bye-Laws; |
|
|
|
provide for a classified or staggered Board of
Directors; and |
|
|
|
reduce the voting power of any shareholder (other than the
persons described above) who owns greater than 9.5% of the
voting shares of American Safety Insurance so that the voting
power of that shareholder will be limited to 9.5% of the voting
power of American Safety Insurance, regardless of the percentage
of voting shares owned. |
These provisions are designed to encourage persons seeking to
acquire control of us to negotiate with the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors believes that, in general, the interests
of our shareholders would be best served if any change in
control results from negotiations with the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors would negotiate based upon careful
consideration of the proposed terms, such as the price to be
paid to shareholders, the form of consideration to be paid and
the anticipated tax effects of the transaction. However, these
provisions could have the effect of discouraging a prospective
acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to
obtain control of American Safety Insurance. To the
92
extent these provisions discourage takeover attempts, they could
deprive shareholders of opportunities to realize takeover
premiums for their shares or could depress the market price of
the Common Shares.
Bye-Laws
The Bye-Laws provide for the internal regulation of American
Safety Insurance, including, among other things, the
establishment of share rights, modification of those rights,
issuance of share certificates, the transfer of shares,
alterations to capital, the convening and conduct of general
meetings, proxies, the appointment and removal of directors,
conduct and power of directors, dividends and the appointment of
any auditor.
In addition to the provisions of the Bye-Laws discussed above,
set forth below is a description of other relevant provisions of
the Bye-Laws. The descriptions are intended as a summary only
and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Bye-Laws
which are filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part.
Shareholder Proposals. The Bye-Laws provide that
shareholders have the right to submit a proposal for
consideration at an annual general meeting or special general
meeting of shareholders or to nominate persons for election as
directors, provided that written notice of that
shareholders intent to make a proposal or nomination must
be received by the Secretary of American Safety Insurance at our
registered offices not later than 60 days prior to that
meeting. A shareholders request for a proposal to be
considered at a meeting must set forth: (i) the name and
record address of the shareholder proposing that proposal;
(ii) a representation that the shareholder is a holder of
record of the shares of American Safety Insurance entitled to
vote at that meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy
at the meeting to present that proposal; (iii) the class
and number of shares of American Safety Insurance which are
beneficially owned by that shareholder; (iv) a brief
description of the business desired to be brought before the
meeting; (v) the reasons for conducting that proposed
business at the meeting; and (vi) any material interest of
the shareholder in that business. In the case of a nomination of
any person for election as a director, the shareholders
request must set forth: (a) the name, age, business address
and residence address of any person to be nominated;
(b) the principal occupation or employment of the person;
(c) the class and number of Common Shares which are
beneficially owned by that person; (d) such other
information regarding the nominee proposed by that shareholder
as would be required to be included in a solicitation for
proxies for election of directors pursuant to Schedule 14A
under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, whether or not
American Safety Insurance is then subject to that Regulation;
and (e) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director
of American Safety Insurance if so elected. The presiding
officer of the meeting will, if the facts warrant, refuse to
acknowledge a proposal or nomination not made in compliance with
the foregoing procedure.
In addition, under the Companies Act, shareholders holding not
less than one tenth of the paid in capital of American Safety
Insurance carrying the right to vote at a general meeting may,
by written notice to the Board of Directors or the Secretary of
American Safety Insurance, require the Board of Directors to
convene a special general meeting of American Safety Insurance
within 60 days after the receipt of that notice. If the
Board of Directors fails to proceed to convene a special general
meeting within 21 days of receipt by American Safety
Insurance of the shareholders request to hold that
meeting, the shareholders may do so themselves in accordance
with the Companies Act.
The advance notice requirements regulating shareholder
nominations and proposals may have the effect of precluding a
contest for the election of directors or the introduction of a
shareholder proposal if the procedures summarized above are not
followed and may discourage or deter a third party from
conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of
directors or to introduce a proposal.
Restrictions on Certain Business Combinations. Our
Bye-Laws contain provisions which restrict certain
business combinations. In general, the Bye-Laws
prohibit an interested shareholder of American
Safety Insurance from either directly or indirectly being a
party to or taking any action in connection with any
business combination with American Safety Insurance
or any of its subsidiaries for a period of five years following
the date that person first became an interested
shareholder, unless
93
(a) the business combination was approved by a
prior resolution of the continuing directors of our
Board of Directors or (b) the business
combination was approved by a prior resolution of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding voting shares of American Safety
Insurance other than those voting shares beneficially held by an
interested shareholder.
A business combination includes (i) any
arrangement, reconstruction or amalgamation involving American
Safety Insurance or any of its subsidiaries and an
interested shareholder, (ii) any transaction or
series of transactions involving the sale, purchase, lease,
exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition or
encumbrance of assets between American Safety Insurance and an
interested shareholder having an aggregate market
value in excess of 5% of the consolidated value of American
Safety Insurance and its subsidiaries prior to the transaction,
(iii) the issue or transfer to an interested
shareholder or any affiliate thereof of any securities by
American Safety Insurance or any of its subsidiaries other than
an issue or distribution to all shareholders of American Safety
Insurance entitled to participate therein, (iv) the
adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or
dissolution of American Safety Insurance or any of its
subsidiaries unless that plan or proposal is initiated, proposed
or adopted independently of any interested
shareholder or any affiliate thereof, (v) the
reclassification of any securities or other restructuring of the
capital of American Safety Insurance or any of its subsidiaries
in such a way as to confer a benefit on the interested
shareholder or any affiliate thereof which is not
conferred on all shareholders of American Safety Insurance and
(vi) the making by American Safety Insurance or any of its
subsidiaries of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or
financial assistance to an interested shareholder.
An interested shareholder is any shareholder of
American Safety Insurance or an affiliate or associate of any
shareholder of American Safety Insurance, other than
(i) Frederick C. Treadway (one of our founding
shareholders) or Treadway Associates, L.P., a limited
partnership owned by Mr. Treadway and his children,
including their respective heirs, successors and assigns or
(ii) any other entity beneficially owned by American Safety
Insurance or any of its subsidiaries, any profit-sharing
employee share ownership or other employee benefit plan of
American Safety Insurance or any of its subsidiaries or any
trustee of or fiduciary with respect to that plan when acting in
that capacity, who is, or has publicly disclosed a plan or
intention to become, the beneficial owner of Common Shares
representing ten percent or more of the value of American Safety
Insurance.
A continuing director includes (i) any member
of our Board of Directors who while a member thereof is not an
interested shareholder or an affiliate, associate or
representative of an interested shareholder and was
a member of our Board of Directors prior to the time that the
interested shareholder became an interested
shareholder and (ii) any person who subsequently
becomes a member of our Board of Directors who, while a member
thereof is not an interested shareholder or an
affiliate, associate or representative of an interested
shareholder, if that persons nomination for election
or election to our Board of Directors is recommended or approved
by a majority of the continuing directors then in
office.
As a result of the application of this provision of the American
Safety Insurances Bye-Laws, potential acquirers of
American Safety Insurance may be discouraged from attempting to
effect an acquisition transaction with American Safety
Insurance, thereby possibly depriving holders of the Common
Shares of certain opportunities to sell or otherwise dispose of
the Common Shares at above-market prices pursuant to that
transaction.
Indemnification of our directors and officers. Our
Bye-Laws provide that American Safety Insurance will indemnify
its directors and officers, and their heirs, executors and
administrators, against all actions, costs, charges, losses,
damages and expenses which they incur by or by reason of any act
done, concurred in or omitted in the execution of their duties,
or supposed duties, or for any loss, misfortune or damage which
may happen in the execution of those duties, provided that this
indemnity will not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud
or dishonesty which may attach to any of those individuals. Our
Bye-Laws further provide that expenses incurred in defending a
civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding will be paid by
American Safety Insurance in advance of the final disposition of
that action, suit or proceeding as
94
authorized by our Board of Directors in the specific case upon
receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director,
officer, liquidator or trustee to repay those amounts unless it
is ultimately determined that the individual is entitled to be
indemnified as authorized in the Bye-Laws or otherwise pursuant
to the laws of Bermuda.
In addition, under the Bye-Laws, each shareholder of American
Safety Insurance and American Safety Insurance itself agrees to
waive any claim or right of action he or it might have, whether
individually or by or in the right of American Safety Insurance,
against any director or officer on account of any action taken
by that director or officer, or the failure of that director or
officer to take any action, in the performance of his duties, or
supposed duties, with or for American Safety Insurance; provided
that this waiver will not extend to any matter in respect of any
fraud or dishonesty which may attach to that director or officer.
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding Common Shares entitled to vote will
be required to amend, repeal or adopt any provision inconsistent
with the foregoing provisions of the Bye-Laws.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Computershare Investor Services LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, is the
transfer agent and registrar for the Common Shares.
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon completion of this offering, we will have outstanding
10,030,165 Common Shares (10,510,165 Common Shares if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). The
3,200,000 Common Shares sold in this offering (3,680,000 Common
Shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option
in full) will be freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act, except that those shares
held by our affiliates (as defined in Rule 144)
will not be freely tradable even though they have been
registered under the Securities Act. In addition, Common Shares
held by directors and executive officers are subject to
lock-up agreements with
the representatives of the underwriters that prohibit their
resale prior to 90 days after the date of the underwriting
agreement without the prior consent of Keefe,
Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Upon the expiration of this
90 day period, these holders will be entitled generally to
dispose of their shares, subject to the provisions of
Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, any
person (or persons whose shares are aggregated), including any
affiliate of ours, who owns Common Shares which have not been
registered under the Securities Act and as to which a minimum of
one year has elapsed since the later of the date of acquisition
from and full payment to American Safety Insurance or an
affiliate of ours, and any affiliate of American Safety
Insurance who owns registered shares, will be entitled to sell,
within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the
date of this prospectus (but subject to the 90 day
lock-up period
described above), a number of Common Shares that does not exceed
the greater of: (i) 1% of the then outstanding Common
Shares or (ii) the average weekly trading volume in the
Common Shares in the public market during the four calendar
weeks preceding the date on which notice of the sale is filed
with the SEC. Sales of Common Shares pursuant to Rule 144
are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions, notice
requirements and the availability of current public information
about us. In addition, under Rule 144, any person who holds
Common Shares which have not been registered under the
Securities Act as to which a minimum of two years has elapsed
since the later of the date of acquisition from and full payment
to us or our affiliate and who is not, and for a period of three
months prior to the sale of those Common Shares has not been, an
affiliate of ours is free to sell those shares without regard to
the volume, manner of sale, notice and other provisions of
Rule 144.
95
CERTAIN BERMUDA LAW CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is based on the advice of Appleby
Spurling Hunter, our Bermuda counsel. We have been designated as
a non-resident for exchange control purposes by the Bermuda
Monetary Authority, Foreign Exchange Control, whose permission
for the issue and transfer of Common Shares has been obtained.
Consent under the Exchange Control Act, 1972 (and regulations
thereunder) has been obtained from the Bermuda Monetary
Authority for the issue and transfer of the Common Shares being
offered pursuant to this offering. In addition, a copy of this
prospectus has been delivered to the Registrar of Companies in
Bermuda in compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act.
In giving that consent and in accepting this prospectus for
filing, the Bermuda Monetary Authority and the Registrar of
Companies in Bermuda, respectively, accept no responsibility for
the financial soundness of any proposal, or for the correctness
of any of the statements made or opinions expressed herein.
The transfer of Common Shares between persons regarded as
non-resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes and the
issue of shares after the completion of this offering to those
persons may be effected without specific consent under the
Exchange Control Act, 1972 and regulations thereunder. Issues
and transfers of shares to any person regarded as resident in
Bermuda for exchange control purposes require specific prior
approval under the Exchange Control Act, 1972.
There are no limitations on the rights of persons regarded as
non-residents of Bermuda for foreign exchange control purposes
owning Common Shares to hold or vote their Common Shares.
Because American Safety Insurance has been designated as a
non-resident for Bermuda exchange control purposes, there are no
restrictions on its ability to transfer funds in and out of
Bermuda or to pay dividends to U.S. residents or other
non-residents of Bermuda who are holders of Common Shares, other
than in respect of local Bermuda currency. In addition, because
American Safety Insurance has been designated as a non-resident
for Bermuda exchange control purposes, it does not intend to
maintain Bermuda dollar deposits and, accordingly, will not pay
dividends on the Common Shares in Bermuda currency.
In accordance with Bermuda law, share certificates are issued
only in the names of corporations or individuals. In the case of
an applicant acting in a special capacity (for example, as an
executor or trustee), certificates may, at the request of the
applicant, record the capacity in which the applicant is acting.
Notwithstanding the recording of any special capacity, American
Safety Insurance is not bound to investigate or incur any
responsibility in respect of the proper administration of any
estate or trust. American Safety Insurance will take no notice
of any trust applicable to any of its Common Shares whether or
not it had notice of that trust.
96
CERTAIN TAX CONSIDERATIONS
Certain Bermuda Tax Considerations
Taxation of American Safety Insurance and its Bermuda
Subsidiaries
The following is a summary of certain Bermuda income tax
considerations under current law. This summary does not purport
to be a comprehensive discussion of all the tax considerations
that may be relevant to a decision to purchase Common Shares.
Prospective investors should consult their professional advisors
concerning the possible tax consequences of the subscription,
purchase, ownership, sale or redemption of Common Shares. Under
current Bermuda law, there is no income or capital gains tax
payable by American Safety Insurance or its Bermuda
subsidiaries. American Safety Insurance and its Bermuda
subsidiaries have received from the Minister of Finance
assurances, under the Tax Protection Act, to the effect that in
the event of there being enacted in Bermuda any legislation
imposing tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any
capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of
estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of that tax
will not be applicable to them or to any of their respective
operations or to their shares, debentures or other obligations
until March 28, 2016. These assurances are subject to the
provision that they are not to be construed so as to prevent the
application of any tax or duty to persons as are ordinarily
resident in Bermuda or to prevent the application of any tax
payable in accordance with the provisions of The Land Tax Act
1967 of Bermuda or otherwise payable in relation to any property
leased to American Safety Insurance or its Bermuda subsidiaries.
American Safety Insurance and its Bermuda subsidiaries are
required to pay certain annual Bermuda government fees. In
addition, American Safety Re and American Safety Assurance are
required to pay certain business fees as an insurer under the
Bermuda Act. Currently, there is no Bermuda withholding
requirement or other tax on dividends paid by the Bermuda
subsidiaries to American Safety Insurance. All entities
employing individuals in Bermuda are required to pay a payroll
tax and certain other taxes, directly or indirectly, to the
Bermuda government.
Tax Treatment of Shareholders
Under current Bermuda law, there is no Bermuda income tax,
withholding tax, capital gains tax, capital transfer tax, estate
duty or inheritance tax payable by shareholders of American
Safety Insurance with respect to an investment in, or subsequent
sale of, the Common Shares.
Certain U.S. Federal Tax Considerations
The following summary of the U.S. federal tax treatment of
American Safety Insurance, its subsidiaries and certain
shareholders of American Safety Insurance is for general
information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete
analysis of all tax considerations that may be applicable to
them. Unless otherwise stated, this discussion deals only with
Common Shares acquired by purchasers in this offering and held
as capital assets. This discussion does not deal with special
classes of purchasers such as
non-U.S. investors,
dealers in securities, traders in securities that elect to use
the mark-to-market
method of accounting, banks, thrifts, real estate investment
trusts, regulated investment companies, insurance companies, tax
exempt organizations, persons holding Common Shares as part of a
straddle or as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or
other integrated investment, or persons whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar. Further, unless otherwise
indicated, it does not address the federal alternative minimum
tax, the tax laws of any state, local or foreign government or
any taxes other than income taxes that may be applicable to
purchasers of Common Shares.
Special rules, not discussed herein, may apply to persons who
hold Common Shares through entities treated for U.S. tax
purposes as a partnership. Persons purchasing Common Shares
through a partnership should consult their own tax advisers.
This summary is based on the Code, the tax regulations
thereunder, administrative and judicial interpretations thereof
and other current laws and authorities, all as of the date
hereof, and all of which are
97
subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis). The
authorities on which this discussion is based are subject to
various interpretations, and it is therefore possible that the
federal income tax treatment of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of the Common Shares may differ from the discussion
provided below. We have not sought any ruling from the IRS with
respect to the statements made or conclusions reached in the
following discussion, and there can be no assurance that the IRS
will agree with those statements and conclusions. In addition,
the IRS is not precluded from asserting a contrary position.
As used herein, the term U.S. Holder means a
beneficial owner of Common Shares that is for U.S. federal
income tax purposes: (i) a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
(ii) a corporation or partnership created or organized
under the laws of the U.S. or a political subdivision
thereof; (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
federal income taxation regardless of its source; (iv) a
trust which is subject to the primary supervision of
U.S. courts and which one or more U.S. persons have
the authority to control all substantial decisions or
(v) any other person or entity that is treated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as if it were one of the
foregoing.
The tax treatment of a shareholder may vary depending on that
shareholders particular tax situation or status, and
therefore, each prospective investor is urged to consult its own
tax advisors as to the particular tax consequences of this
offering, including the effect and applicability of federal,
state, local and foreign income and other tax laws.
U.S. Taxation of American Safety Insurance and its
Bermuda Subsidiaries
In general, a foreign corporation is subject to
(i) U.S. federal income tax at graduated rates on its
taxable income that is treated as effectively connected with its
conduct of a trade or business within the U.S. and (ii) the
30% U.S. branch profits tax on its effectively connected
earnings and profits (with certain adjustments) deemed
repatriated from the U.S., unless the corporation is entitled to
relief under the provisions of a tax treaty into which the
U.S. has entered. If U.S. federal income tax is
imposed, the amount of effectively connected income would be
computed in a manner generally analogous to that applied to the
income of a U.S. corporation. Treasury Regulations provide
that a
non-U.S. corporation
can generally claim deductions and credits only if it files a
U.S. income tax return. The U.S. Tax Court, however,
recently invalidated this regulation and permitted a
non-U.S. corporation
to claim deductions and credits despite not timely filing a tax
return. Nevertheless, penalties may be assessed for failure to
file tax returns.
Whether a foreign corporation is engaged in a U.S. trade or
business or is carrying on an insurance business in the
U.S. depends upon the level of activities conducted in the
U.S. either directly by the foreign corporations
officers or employees or by other agents. For example, if the
activities carried on in the U.S. or on behalf of a foreign
company are continuous, regular, and considerable
the foreign company will be deemed to be engaged in a
U.S. trade or business. Management believes that American
Safety Insurance and its Bermuda subsidiaries have been operated
and, in the future, will continue to be operated in a manner
that will not cause any of them to be treated as being engaged
in a U.S. trade or business.
However, because the Code, Treasury Regulations and court
decisions do not identify definitively activities that
constitute being engaged in a U.S. trade or business, and
because of the factual nature of the determination, there can be
no assurance that the IRS will not contend that American Safety
Insurance and/or its Bermuda subsidiaries are engaged in a
U.S. trade or business. If American Safety Insurance and/or
its Bermuda subsidiaries were considered to be engaged in a
U.S. trade or business, each could be subject to
(i) U.S. federal income tax on income effectively
connected with that trade or business and (ii) the
U.S. branch profits tax.
If our Bermuda insurance subsidiaries were to qualify for
benefits under the Bermuda Treaty, business profits earned would
be taxed in the U.S. only if the profits were attributable
to the conduct of a trade or
98
business carried on through a permanent
establishment in the U.S. An insurance enterprise
resident in Bermuda generally will be entitled to the benefits
of the Bermuda Treaty if:
|
|
|
|
|
more than 50% of its equity is owned beneficially, directly or
indirectly, by individual residents of the U.S. or Bermuda
or U.S. citizens; and |
|
|
|
its income is not used in substantial part, directly or
indirectly, to make disproportionate distributions to, or to
meet certain liabilities to, persons who are not residents of
the U.S. or Bermuda or U.S. citizens. |
For purposes of the Bermuda Treaty, a permanent
establishment generally is defined to include (i) a
branch, office or other fixed place of business through which
the business of the enterprise is carried on, (ii) the
furnishing of certain services either for an associated
enterprise or for an aggregate of 90 days in a twelve-month
period or (iii) an agent (other than an agent of
independent status acting in the ordinary course of its business
and, where the activities of the agent are devoted substantially
on behalf of that enterprise, transacting with the enterprise
under arms-length conditions) that has, and habitually
exercises in the U.S., authority to conclude contracts in the
name of the enterprise. No regulations interpreting the Bermuda
treaty have been issued.
American Safety Insurance should not be eligible for benefits
under the Bermuda Treaty as it is a holding company and not an
insurance company. We cannot be certain that our Bermuda
insurance subsidiaries will be eligible for treaty benefits due
to uncertainty regarding the ownership, citizenship and
residency of American Safety Insurances shareholders.
Foreign insurance companies carrying on an insurance business
within the U.S. have a certain minimum amount of
effectively connected net investment income, determined in
accordance with a formula that depends, in part, on the amount
of U.S. risk insured or reinsured by those companies. If
our Bermuda insurance subsidiaries are considered to be engaged
in the conduct of an insurance business in the U.S. and they are
not entitled to the benefits of the Bermuda Treaty in general
(because they fail to satisfy one of the limitations on treaty
benefits discussed above), the Code could subject a significant
portion of their investment income to U.S. income tax. In
addition, while the Bermuda Treaty clearly applies to premium
income, it is uncertain whether the Bermuda Treaty applies to
other income such as investment income. If our Bermuda insurance
subsidiaries are considered engaged in the conduct of an
insurance business in the U.S. and are entitled to the benefits
of the Bermuda Treaty in general, but the Bermuda Treaty is
interpreted to not apply to investment income, a significant
portion of the investment income of our Bermuda insurance
subsidiaries could be subject to U.S. income tax.
Foreign corporations that are not engaged in a trade or business
in the U.S. (as well as foreign corporations engaged in the
conduct of a trade or business in the U.S., but only with
respect to their income that is not effectively connected with
that trade or business) are subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax on certain fixed or determinable annual or
periodical income (such as dividends and interest on
certain investments) derived from sources within the
U.S. unless an exemption applies. This tax is generally
imposed at a rate of 30% on the gross income subject to tax, and
is generally collected by withholding on the income unless the
withholding rate is reduced by a tax treaty. The Bermuda Treaty
does not provide for a reduction.
If a substantial portion of American Safety Insurances
and/or our Bermuda insurance subsidiaries income were
subject to U.S. federal income taxation, either because
(i) we or our Bermuda insurance subsidiaries were deemed
engaged in a U.S. trade or businesses, (ii) our
investments were not eligible for an exemption from the 30%
withholding tax or (iii) our Bermuda insurance subsidiaries
were deemed to have a permanent establishment in the U.S., the
value of the Common Shares could be materially adversely
affected.
U.S. Federal Excise Tax on Insurance Premiums
The U.S. also imposes an excise tax on insurance and
reinsurance premiums paid to foreign insurers or reinsurers with
respect to risks located in the U.S. The rates of tax
currently applicable are 4% of gross
99
casualty insurance premiums and 1% of gross reinsurance
premiums, unless reduced by an applicable income tax treaty. The
Bermuda Treaty does not reduce or eliminate this excise tax.
Accordingly, any insurance or reinsurance premiums paid to our
Bermuda insurance subsidiaries with respect to U.S. risks
will be subject to the U.S. federal excise tax. Although
payment of the tax is generally the responsibility of the person
who pays the premium, under the Code and regulations thereunder,
in the event that the tax is not paid by the purchaser of the
insurance, any person who makes, signs, issues or
sells any of the documents or instruments subject to the
tax is liable for the tax. In addition, the IRS has taken the
position that when a foreign insurer or reinsurer cedes
U.S. risks to a foreign reinsurer that is not eligible for
the excise tax exemption under an applicable treaty, an
additional excise tax may be imposed.
Tax Treatment of Shareholders
Subject to the discussion below relating to the potential
application of the controlled foreign corporation or passive
foreign investment company rules to American Safety Insurance,
cash distributions made with respect to the Common Shares will
constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes
to the extent paid out of the earnings and profits of American
Safety Insurance. Generally, dividends received by
U.S. Holders that are corporations will not be eligible for
the dividends received deduction. U.S. Holders (and foreign
corporations as to which distributions are considered
effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in
the U.S.), will generally be subject to U.S. federal income
tax on the receipt of dividends. Distributions in excess of
earnings and profits will not be taxed to the extent of a
U.S. Holders basis in its Common Shares, and will
reduce basis. Any amount in excess of basis will be treated as
gain from the sale or exchange of the Common Shares. The
character of this gain is described below under
Taxation of Capital Gains.
Qualified dividend income (generally, dividends received during
the tax year from domestic corporations and qualified
foreign corporations) is taxed at the same rates that
apply to net capital gain. Accordingly, the highest
U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to those dividends
would be 15% for individuals and 35% for corporations. Provided
that a foreign corporation is not a passive foreign
investment company (as defined in Code Section 1297
and as discussed below), that corporation will be treated as a
qualified foreign corporation if, among other
things, the stock with respect to which the dividend is paid is
readily tradable on an established securities market in the
U.S. It is anticipated that the Common Shares will be
readily tradable on the New York Stock Exchange. Because our
management believes that American Safety Insurance will not be
treated as a passive foreign investment company and because our
Common Shares are readily tradable on the New York Stock
Exchange, American Safety Insurance will be a qualified foreign
corporation, and dividends paid on Common Shares should qualify
as qualified dividend income eligible for favorable net capital
gain rates.
|
|
|
Taxation of Capital Gains |
Subject to the discussion below relating to disposition of
shares and the potential application of the passive foreign
investment company, controlled foreign corporation and related
party insurance income rules to the foreign corporation, upon
the sale or exchange of Common Shares, a U.S. Holder will
recognize a gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax
purposes equal to the difference between the amount realized
upon that sale or exchange and the U.S. Holders
U.S. federal income tax basis for the Common Shares
disposed of. Gain recognized by a U.S. Holder who is a
U.S. resident generally will be U.S. source income.
The rate of tax and treatment of such gain or loss depends on
whether the U.S. Holder is an individual or an entity, and
on the holding period of the Common Shares.
|
|
|
Classification as a Controlled Foreign Corporation |
If a foreign corporation is a controlled foreign
corporation (a CFC) for an uninterrupted
period of 30 days or more during any taxable year, its
U.S. 10% shareholders (as defined below) who
own stock in that corporation, directly, or indirectly through
foreign persons, on the last day in the year on
100
which that corporation is a CFC must include in their gross
income their respective pro rata shares of the CFCs
Subpart F Income, even if that income is not
distributed. Subpart F Income includes, among
other items, insurance income, which is defined as
any income (including underwriting and investment income) that
is attributable to the issuing or reinsuring of any insurance or
annuity contract attributable to risks outside the CFCs
country of incorporation, and which would be taxed under
subchapter L of the Code if that income were the income of a
U.S. insurance company (Subpart F Insurance
Income). However, Subpart F Insurance Income does not
include any income of a CFC from sources within the
U.S. that is effectively connected with the conduct of a
U.S. trade or business, unless the CFC is exempt from
U.S. taxation on the income under an income tax treaty into
which the U.S. has entered. Subpart F
Income also includes, to the extent not treated as part of
Subpart F Insurance Income, passive investment income such as
interest, dividends and certain capital gains.
In general, a foreign corporation is treated as a CFC if the
U.S. 10% shareholders of that corporation
collectively own directly, indirectly through foreign entities
or by constructively by applying the constructive ownership
rules of Section 958(b) of the Code, more than 50% of the
total combined voting power or total value of the
corporations stock. However, for purposes only of taking
into account Subpart F Insurance Income (as defined above), a
foreign corporation will be treated as a CFC if (i) more
than 25% of the total combined voting power or total value of
its stock is so owned by U.S. shareholders and
(ii) the gross amount of premiums in respect of reinsurance
or the issuing of insurance or annuity contracts with respect to
risks outside its country of organization exceeds 75% of the
gross amount of all premiums or other consideration in respect
of all risks. For these purposes, a U.S. 10%
shareholder means any U.S. person who owns directly,
indirectly through foreign entities or constructively by
applying the constructive ownership rules of Section 958(b)
of the Code, 10% or more of the total combined voting power of
all classes of stock of the foreign corporation.
Management believes that the anticipated dispersion of share
ownership among holders and the provisions of the Bye-Laws
restricting voting power of the Common Shares should prevent any
U.S. person, other than Frederick C. Treadway or Treadway
Associates, L.P., or their successors, heirs or assigns, who
(directly, indirectly through foreign entities or
constructively) owns Common Shares from becoming a U.S. 10%
shareholder of American Safety Insurance. However, due to the
attribution provisions of the Code regarding determination of
beneficial ownership, it is possible that one or more of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries
may be CFCs and U.S. Holders may be treated as owning 10%
or more of the total voting power of a subsidiary,
notwithstanding the reduction of voting rights discussed above.
These Bye-Law provisions, however, have not been directly passed
on by the IRS or by any court. There can be no assurance that if
a U.S. person were to become a U.S. 10% shareholder of
American Safety Insurance and/or one of our Bermuda
subsidiaries, such U.S. 10% shareholder would not have to
include in gross income its allocable share of
Subpart F Income of American Safety Insurance
and/or one of our Bermuda subsidiaries. Shareholders should
consult their tax advisers if they believe they may become a
U.S. 10% shareholder.
|
|
|
Related Person Insurance Income |
Special rules apply to the related person insurance
income (RPII), if any, of a foreign insurance
corporation. These rules do not apply to a foreign insurance
corporation if (i) less than 20% of the voting power and
less than 20% of the total value of the capital stock of that
corporation is owned at any time during the taxable year
(directly or indirectly) by persons who are (directly or
indirectly) insured under any policy of insurance or reinsurance
issued by that corporation, or who are related to that person,
(ii) the RPII of that corporation for the taxable year,
determined on a gross basis, is less than 20% of its gross
Subpart F Insurance Income (as defined above but without
provisions which limit insurance income to income from countries
other than the country in which the corporation was created or
organized) (the De Minimis Exception),
(iii) that corporation elects to treat its RPII as income
effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or
business or (iv) that corporation elects to be treated as a
U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If none of the above exceptions applies, and if all
U.S. shareholders (as defined below) in the
aggregate, own, directly or indirectly through foreign
101
entities, 25% or more of the total combined voting power or
total value of that corporation, its RPII must be included pro
rata in the gross income of those U.S. persons, even though
that income is not distributed.
RPII is defined as any insurance income attributable to a policy
of insurance or reinsurance with respect to which the person
(directly or indirectly) insured is a
U.S. shareholder in the foreign corporation, or
a related person to that shareholder. For the
purposes only of taking into account RPII, and subject to the
exceptions described below, the term
U.S. shareholder means with respect to any
foreign insurance corporation, a U.S. person that owns any
stock (rather than 10% or more of the voting power), either
directly or indirectly through foreign entities, in that foreign
insurance corporation (this type of person is hereinafter
sometimes referred to as an RPII Shareholder).
Hence, for purposes of testing if American Safety Insurance or
its
non-U.S. insurance
subsidiaries is a CFC solely for RPII purposes (an RPII
CFC), all U.S. Holders are included for purposes of
the 25% ownership test and the inclusion of RPII in taxable
income. The term related person for this purpose
generally means an individual, corporation, partnership, trust
or estate which has control of, or is controlled by, an RPII
CFC, or which is controlled by the same person or persons that
have control of the RPII CFC. For these purposes, control is
generally defined as control of more than 50% of either the
voting power or value of a corporation.
Our management does not believe that the RPII of American Safety
Insurance or any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
equals or exceeds (and will not in the future equal or exceed)
the 20% threshold and, as a result, the De Minimis Exception
should apply. In addition, our management believes that less
than 20% of the total value and voting power of the stock of
American Safety Insurance or any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
is or will be owned by persons who are (directly or indirectly)
insured by that entity or who are related to those persons. If
either of these exceptions applies (the De Minimis Exception, or
the exception from the RPII rules based on less than 20%
ownership by insureds and related persons), then the special
rules concerning RPII of a foreign insurance corporation will be
inapplicable. However, there can be no assurance that this will
be the case. Consequently, there can be no assurance that a
U.S. person will not be required to include amounts in its
income in respect of RPII in any taxable year. In addition, the
RPII provisions have not been interpreted by the courts and
regulations are in proposed form. Due to these uncertainties,
prospective investors should consult with their tax advisors.
Our management has no plan or intent to cause American Safety
Insurance or any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
to elect to treat its RPII as effectively connected income or to
be treated as a U.S. corporation.
If American Safety Insurance or any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
were characterized as an RPII CFC, U.S. persons who are
RPII Shareholders on the last day of the taxable year might be
required to include in gross income for U.S. federal income
tax purposes their pro rata portion of all the RPII of American
Safety Insurance (or any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries,
as applicable) for the entire taxable year, whether or not
distributed. Inclusion would be required even if the RPII
Shareholders owned shares only on the last day of the taxable
year. Conversely, a U.S. shareholder that owned shares
during the taxable year, but not on the last day, would not be
required to include in gross income.
|
|
|
Disposition of Shares in a CFC or RPII CFC |
Section 1248 of the Code generally applies to the sale or
exchange of shares of stock in a CFC by a U.S. person that
owned, directly or indirectly through foreign entities or by
applying the constructive ownership rules of Section 958(b)
of the Code, shares possessing 10% or more of the voting power
of that foreign corporation at any time during the five-year
period ending on the date of the sale or exchange when the
corporation was a CFC. Any gain recognized by that shareholder
may be treated as a dividend to the extent of certain earnings
and profits attributable to the shares sold or exchanged. That
shareholder generally will be required to report a disposition
of its shares by attaching Form 5471, Information Return of
U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations,
to its U.S. federal income tax return or information return
that it would normally file for the taxable year in which the
disposition occurs. As explained above, management believes that
neither American Safety Insurance nor any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
is currently or will be a CFC. Accordingly, to the extent that
Section 1248 of the Code applies to regular CFCs,
Section 1248 of the Code should not apply to any
shareholder of American
102
Safety Insurance because it can only apply if the foreign
corporation is a CFC at some point during the applicable
five-year period.
For purposes of Section 1248 of the Code and the
requirement to file Form 5471, special rules apply with
respect to a foreign insurance corporation that has RPII during
the five-year period ending on the date of the disposition. If
U.S. persons own 25% or more of the shares of the foreign
insurance corporation, the corporation will be characterized as
a RPII CFC even if the corporation qualifies for the De Minimis
Exception or the ownership of its shares by direct or indirect
insureds and related persons is less than the 20% threshold.
Additionally, proposed Treasury Department regulations issued in
1991 provide that Section 1248 of the Code and the
requirement to file Form 5471 apply to a U.S. person
that owned any stock (rather than 10% or more of the voting
power) of the foreign insurance corporation. However, existing
Treasury Department regulations do not address the issue. There
is no assurance that the Treasury Department or the IRS will not
take the position, as provided in the proposed regulations, that
Section 1248 of the Code and the requirement to file
Form 5471 are applicable to stock dispositions by
U.S. shareholders owning any shares (rather than 10% or
more of the voting power) in a corporation like American Safety
Insurance, which is engaged in the insurance business indirectly
through subsidiaries.
Because it is anticipated that U.S. persons will own a
majority of American Safety Insurances Common Shares, a
portion of the current income inclusions under the CFC, RPII and
passive foreign investment company rules, if any, and of the
dividends paid by American Safety Insurance (including any gain
from the sale or exchange of Common Shares that is treated as a
dividend under Section 1248 of the Code) may not be treated
as foreign source income for purposes of computing a
shareholders U.S. foreign tax credit limitation.
American Safety Insurance will consider providing shareholders
with information regarding the portion of the amounts
constituting foreign source income to the extent that
information is reasonably available. It is likely that
substantially all of the RPII and dividends that are foreign
source income will constitute either passive or
financial services income for foreign tax credit
limitation purposes. Thus, it may not be possible for most
U.S. shareholders to utilize excess foreign tax credits to
reduce U.S. tax on that income.
|
|
|
Passive Foreign Investment Company |
In general, a foreign corporation will be a passive foreign
investment company (a PFIC) if 75% or more of its
gross income constitutes passive income or 50% or
more of its assets produce passive income or are
held for the production of passive income.
The U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a special
tax and an interest charge at the time of the sale of (or
receipt of an excess distribution with respect to)
their capital stock in the PFIC, unless these
U.S. shareholders elect to be currently taxed on their pro
rata share of the PFICs earnings, whether or not
distributed. In general, a U.S. shareholder is treated as
having received an excess distribution if the amount
of the distribution was more than 125% of the average
distribution with respect to its capital stock during the three
preceding taxable years (or shorter period during which the
U.S. shareholder held the shares). In general, the special
tax is equivalent to an interest charge on taxes deemed due
during the period the U.S. shareholder owned the shares. It
is computed by assuming that the excess distribution or, in the
case of a sale, the gain with respect to the capital stock was
earned in equal portions throughout the
U.S. shareholders period of ownership. The portion
allocable to each year prior to the year of sale is taxed at the
maximum marginal tax rate applicable for each of those periods.
The interest charge is determined based on the applicable rate
imposed on underpayments of U.S. federal income tax of
those periods.
For the purposes of the PFIC rules, passive income
is defined to include income of the kind which would be foreign
personal holding company income under Section 954(c) of the
Code, and generally includes interest, dividends, annuities and
other investment income. However, passive income does not
include interest income or dividends received from controlled
subsidiaries or certain other related persons to the extent
properly allocable to income of that related person that is not
passive income. In addition,
103
the PFIC provisions specifically exclude from the definition of
passive income any income derived in the active
conduct of an insurance business by a corporation which is
predominantly engaged in an insurance business and which would
be subject to tax under Subchapter L if it were a domestic
corporation. This exception is intended to ensure that income
derived by a bona fide insurance company is not treated as
passive income. Thus, only income attributable to financial
reserves in excess of the reasonable needs of the insurance
business is treated as passive income. The PFIC provisions also
provide that for purposes of determining whether a foreign
corporation is a PFIC, the foreign corporation is treated as if
it held its proportionate share of the assets and received
directly its proportionate share of the income of any
corporation of which it owns (directly or indirectly) at least
25% of the value of the capital stock.
Our management believes that American Safety Insurance and its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
are, and will be, predominantly engaged in an insurance business
and do not, and will not, have financial reserves in excess of
the reasonable needs of their insurance business. Accordingly,
the income and assets of American Safety Insurance and its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
should not constitute passive income or passive assets. As
American Safety Insurance should be treated as holding all the
assets and receiving all the income of its subsidiaries,
including its
non-U.S. insurance
subsidiaries, and our management does not anticipate that 75% or
more of the gross income that American Safety Insurance is
thereby deemed to receive or actually receives will be passive
income, or that 50% or more of the assets that American Safety
Insurance is thereby deemed to hold or actually holds will be
passive assets, our management does not believe that American
Safety Insurance is or will be classified as a PFIC.
No regulations interpreting the substantive PFIC provisions have
yet been issued. Additionally, the IRS has announced that it
intends to scrutinize
non-U.S. insurance
companies and apply the PFIC rules to companies that are not
active insurance companies, and to apply the PFIC rules to a
non-U.S. companys
income not derived in the active conduct of an insurance
business. We cannot be certain, therefore, that the IRS will not
challenge our position that American Safety Insurance and our
Bermuda insurance subsidiaries are not PFICs.
|
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding |
Except as discussed below with respect to backup withholding,
dividends paid by American Safety Insurance will not be subject
to a U.S. withholding tax.
Information reporting to the IRS by paying agents and custodians
located in the U.S. will be required with respect to
payments of dividends to U.S. persons. A holder of Common
Shares may be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 28%
with respect to dividends paid by those paying agents and
customers unless the holder (i) establishes that it is a
corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories or
(ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and
otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup
withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax,
and may be credited against the holders U.S. federal
income tax liability. Additionally, RPII Shareholders,
U.S. 10% shareholders in a CFC, and in certain
circumstances, U.S. persons who acquire 10% of the vote or
value of a foreign corporation which is not a CFC, may be
required to file a Form 5471 with the IRS. The failure to
file a Form 5471 may result in penalties.
The foregoing discussion is general information. Accordingly,
we urge each prospective investor to consult a tax advisor as to
the particular tax consequences to that investor of the
ownership and disposition of common shares, including the
applicability and effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws
and any recent or prospective changes in applicable tax laws.
104
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the
underwriting agreement among us and the underwriters named
below, each of the underwriters has severally agreed to
purchase, and we have agreed to sell to each of the
underwriters, the respective number of Common Shares set forth
opposite the name of each of the underwriters below:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriter |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriters are subject to approval of certain matters by their
counsel and to various other conditions precedent. The
underwriters are committed to purchase and pay for all of the
Common Shares offered hereby, if any are purchased. The
underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the
Common Shares to the public at the offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus and to certain selected
dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of
$ per
share. The underwriters may allow, and those dealers may
reallow, a concession not in excess of
$ per
share to certain other dealers. After the public offering of the
Common Shares, the public offering price, concession and
reallowance to dealers may be changed by the underwriters. The
Common Shares are offered subject to receipt and acceptance by
the underwriters, and to certain other conditions, including the
right to reject orders in whole or in part.
The Company has granted to the underwriters an option,
exercisable during a period of 30 days from the date of the
underwriting agreement, to purchase up to 480,000 additional
Common Shares (the Option Shares), solely to cover
over-allotments, if any, at the public offering price less the
underwriting discounts set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus. To the extent that this option to purchase is
exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to
certain conditions, to purchase approximately the same
percentage of Option Shares as the number set forth next to that
underwriters name in the preceding table bears to the sum
of the total number of Common Shares in that table.
Each of American Safety Insurance and the executive officers and
directors of American Safety Insurance have agreed that it will
not, and American Safety Insurance has agreed that it will cause
its officers and directors and those of its direct and indirect
subsidiaries not to, without the prior written consent of Keefe,
Bruyette & Woods, Inc., during a period of 90 days
from the date of the underwriting agreement directly or
indirectly (i) offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell
any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or
contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase
or lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any Common Shares or any securities convertible into
or exercisable or exchangeable for Common Shares or file, or
cause to be filed, any registration statement under the
Securities Act with respect to any of the foregoing or
(ii) enter into any swap or any other agreement or any
transaction that transfers, in whole or in part, directly or
indirectly, the economic consequence of ownership of the Common
Shares, whether any such swap or transaction described in
clause (i) or (ii) above is to be settled by delivery
of Common Shares or other securities, in cash or otherwise. The
foregoing sentence will not apply to the offering of the Common
Shares described in this prospectus.
Subject to certain limitations, we have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against, and to contribute to losses arising out
of, certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
The foregoing is a summary of the principal terms of the
underwriting agreement and does not purport to be complete.
Reference is made to a copy of the underwriting agreement, which
is on file as an exhibit to the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part.
105
In connection with this offering, the underwriters and any
selling group members and their respective affiliates may engage
in transactions effected in accordance with Rule 104 of the
SECs Regulation M that are intended to stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the market price of the Common
Shares. These transactions may include over-allotment
transactions in which the underwriters create a short position
for their own account by selling more Common Shares than they
are committed to purchase from us. In this case, to cover all or
part of the short position, the underwriters may exercise the
over-allotment option described above or may purchase Common
Shares in the open market following completion of this offering.
The underwriters also may engage in stabilizing transactions in
which they bid for, and purchase Common Shares at a level above
that which might otherwise prevail in the open market for the
purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price
of the Common Shares. The underwriters may also reclaim any
selling concession allowed to a dealer if the underwriters
purchase shares distributed by that dealer. Any of the foregoing
transactions may result in the maintenance of a price for the
Common Shares at levels above that which might otherwise prevail
in the open market. Neither we nor the underwriters make any
representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of
any effect that the transactions described above may have on the
price of the Common Shares. The underwriters are not required to
engage in any of the foregoing transactions and, if commenced,
those transactions may be discontinued at any time without
notice.
The following table shows the amounts we will pay the
underwriters assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriter |
|
No Exercise | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that our share of the total expense of this
offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will
be approximately $600,000.
The underwriters and their affiliates engage in transactions and
perform services for the Company and its affiliates in the
ordinary course of business and have engaged, and may in the
future engage, in commercial banking and/or investment banking
transactions with the Company or its affiliates.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the Common Shares offered hereby will be passed
upon on behalf of American Safety Insurance by Appleby Spurling
Hunter, Hamilton, Bermuda. Certain legal matters with respect to
this offering will be passed upon for American Safety Insurance
by Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, and for the
underwriters by Sidley Austin
llp, New York, New
York. In connection therewith, Troutman Sanders LLP and Sidley
Austin llp
may rely with respect to certain matters of Bermuda law
on the opinion of Appleby Spurling Hunter.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements including schedules
incorporated by reference of American Safety Insurance as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2004 have been included
herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the
reports of KPMG LLP for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003 and BDO Seidman, LLP for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, each independent accountants,
appearing elsewhere herein and upon the authority of those firms
as experts in accounting and auditing.
106
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
This prospectus is part of a registration statement on
Form S-1 filed by
us with the SEC relating to the Common Shares offered under this
prospectus. As permitted by SEC rules, this prospectus does not
contain all of the information contained in the registration
statement and accompanying exhibits and schedules filed by us
with the SEC. The registration statement, the exhibits and
schedules provide additional information about us and the Common
Shares. The registration statement, exhibits and schedules are
also available at the SECs public reference rooms or the
SEC website at www.sec.gov.
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. These documents are
available for inspection and copying by the public at the Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. Our
filings are also available to the public on the internet through
a website maintained by the SEC, which contains reports, proxy
and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
www.sec.gov. You may also find our SEC filings and other
relevant information about us at our website at
www.americansafetyinsurance.com. The addresses of the
SECs and our websites are provided solely for the
information of prospective investors and are not intended to be
active links.
ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES UNDER U.S. FEDERAL
SECURITIES LAWS AND OTHERS MATTERS
We are a specialty insurance holding company organized under the
laws of Bermuda and some of our officers and directors are or
will be residents of various jurisdictions outside of the
U.S. In addition, some of our assets and the assets of our
officers and directors are or may be located in jurisdictions
outside of the U.S. However, we presently have only one
officer residing in a jurisdiction outside of the
U.S. Therefore, it ordinarily could be difficult for
investors to effect service of process within the U.S. on
us or any of our officers and directors who reside outside of
the U.S., and it may not be possible to enforce court judgments
obtained in the U.S. against us or those officers and
directors based on the civil liability provisions of the federal
and state securities law of the U.S. in Bermuda or in
countries other than the U.S. where we currently, and may
in the future, have assets. It may be difficult for you to
effect service of process within the U.S. upon any
directors, officers and experts who reside outside the
U.S. or to enforce in the U.S. judgments of
U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or any directors
and officers, as well as experts named in this document, who
reside outside the U.S.
We have been advised by Appleby Spurling Hunter, our Bermuda
counsel, that there is doubt as to whether the courts of Bermuda
would enforce (i) judgments of the U.S. courts
obtained in actions against those persons or us predicated upon
the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal
securities laws and (ii) original actions brought in
Bermuda against any persons or us predicated solely upon
U.S. federal securities laws. We have also been advised by
Appleby Spurling Hunter that the U.S. and Bermuda do not
currently have a treaty providing for the reciprocal recognition
and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and
there are grounds upon which Bermuda courts may not enforce
judgments of U.S. courts. Therefore, a final judgment for
the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in
the U.S. based on civil liability, whether or not based
solely on the U.S. federal or state securities laws, would
not automatically be enforceable in Bermuda. Certain remedies
available under the laws of U.S. jurisdictions, including
certain remedies available under U.S. federal securities
law, would not be allowed in Bermuda courts as contrary to
Bermudas public policy.
107
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
|
|
|
F-37 |
|
|
|
|
F-38 |
|
|
|
|
F-39 |
|
|
|
|
F-46 |
|
|
|
|
F-50 |
|
|
|
|
F-51 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2005 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity, cash flows
and comprehensive income for the years then ended. We have also
audited Schedules II, III, and IV as of and for the
period ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. These consolidated
financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedules
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
controls over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the years then
ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
the related schedules present fairly, in all material respects,
the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 10, 2006
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity, cash flows, and
comprehensive income of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003. In
connection with our audit of the consolidated financial
statements, we also have audited financial statement
schedules II, III, and IV for the year ended
December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements
and schedules are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements and schedules based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results
of operations and the cash flows of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2003, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedules, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 24, 2004, except as to Note 10,
which is as of March 16, 2006
F-3
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
$ |
286,057,489 |
|
|
$ |
364,856,826 |
|
Common stock, at fair value
|
|
|
15,081,360 |
|
|
|
21,706,103 |
|
Preferred stock, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,607,000 |
|
Investment in real estate, at cost
|
|
|
2,005,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
25,898,131 |
|
|
|
25,326,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
329,042,420 |
|
|
|
415,496,577 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
24,843,736 |
|
|
|
23,289,927 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
144,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
3,308,463 |
|
|
|
4,037,573 |
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
21,093,810 |
|
|
|
17,315,778 |
|
Ceded unearned premium
|
|
|
25,454,691 |
|
|
|
29,880,672 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
145,524,068 |
|
|
|
173,490,056 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
9,080,990 |
|
|
|
11,933,791 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
11,559,188 |
|
|
|
10,628,874 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,900,473 |
|
|
|
4,489,608 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
10,207,637 |
|
|
|
6,572,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
584,159,976 |
|
|
$ |
697,134,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$ |
321,623,730 |
|
|
$ |
394,872,581 |
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
93,798,378 |
|
|
|
100,241,061 |
|
Reinsurance on paid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
6,486,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded premiums payable
|
|
|
11,852,028 |
|
|
|
16,505,732 |
|
Escrow deposits
|
|
|
144,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
15,370,443 |
|
|
|
13,066,758 |
|
Funds held
|
|
|
8,334,794 |
|
|
|
11,190,989 |
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
13,019,489 |
|
|
|
37,810,099 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
4,750,782 |
|
|
|
5,012,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
475,380,293 |
|
|
|
578,699,616 |
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized
5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized
15,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2004 6,781,721 shares, and at
December 31, 2005 6,753,731 shares
|
|
|
67,817 |
|
|
|
67,537 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
51,067,506 |
|
|
|
49,460,019 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
55,800,942 |
|
|
|
70,457,352 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net
|
|
|
1,843,418 |
|
|
|
(1,549,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
108,779,683 |
|
|
|
118,435,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
584,159,976 |
|
|
$ |
697,134,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct premiums earned
|
|
$ |
175,916,243 |
|
|
$ |
223,715,154 |
|
|
$ |
231,518,793 |
|
Assumed premiums earned
|
|
|
8,486,420 |
|
|
|
4,000,601 |
|
|
|
(81,311 |
) |
Ceded premiums earned
|
|
|
(75,068,826 |
) |
|
|
(91,325,127 |
) |
|
|
(92,901,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
109,333,837 |
|
|
|
136,390,628 |
|
|
|
138,536,069 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5,800,536 |
|
|
|
9,772,722 |
|
|
|
14,315,891 |
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
3,139,907 |
|
|
|
208,135 |
|
|
|
(54,101 |
) |
Real estate income
|
|
|
57,555,194 |
|
|
|
67,967,125 |
|
|
|
3,000,078 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
161,785 |
|
|
|
317,784 |
|
|
|
76,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
175,991,259 |
|
|
|
214,656,394 |
|
|
|
155,874,223 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
65,833,743 |
|
|
|
93,503,285 |
|
|
|
84,406,158 |
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
21,817,717 |
|
|
|
26,528,722 |
|
|
|
28,511,675 |
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
|
|
9,048,799 |
|
|
|
10,297,037 |
|
|
|
12,130,136 |
|
Real estate expenses
|
|
|
53,998,892 |
|
|
|
55,480,408 |
|
|
|
2,439,022 |
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
14,635,404 |
|
|
|
9,635,383 |
|
|
|
13,158,004 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
311,774 |
|
|
|
988,202 |
|
|
|
515,233 |
|
Expenses due to (recovered from) rescission
|
|
|
255,145 |
|
|
|
(229,568 |
) |
|
|
(1,334,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
165,901,474 |
|
|
|
196,203,469 |
|
|
|
139,826,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
10,089,785 |
|
|
|
18,452,925 |
|
|
|
16,048,157 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,675,375 |
|
|
|
3,695,950 |
|
|
|
1,391,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
7,414,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,756,975 |
|
|
$ |
14,656,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
5,105,770 |
|
|
|
6,863,619 |
|
|
|
6,736,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
5,233,716 |
|
|
|
7,342,879 |
|
|
|
7,163,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
Years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Common stock number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
4,739,888 |
|
|
|
6,910,766 |
|
|
|
6,781,721 |
|
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
2,170,878 |
|
|
|
87,855 |
|
|
|
173,583 |
|
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219,900 |
) |
|
|
(201,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
6,910,766 |
|
|
|
6,781,721 |
|
|
|
6,753,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
47,399 |
|
|
$ |
69,108 |
|
|
$ |
67,817 |
|
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
21,709 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,170 |
) |
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
69,108 |
|
|
$ |
67,817 |
|
|
$ |
67,537 |
|
Additional paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
25,889,904 |
|
|
$ |
52,744,720 |
|
|
$ |
51,067,506 |
|
|
Issuance of common shares
|
|
|
26,854,816 |
|
|
|
805,825 |
|
|
|
1,336,211 |
|
|
Repurchase of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,483,039 |
) |
|
|
(2,943,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
52,744,720 |
|
|
$ |
51,067,506 |
|
|
$ |
49,460,019 |
|
Retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
33,629,557 |
|
|
$ |
41,043,967 |
|
|
$ |
55,800,942 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
7,414,410 |
|
|
|
14,756,975 |
|
|
|
14,656,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
41,043,967 |
|
|
$ |
55,800,942 |
|
|
$ |
70,457,352 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
2,884,989 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,328 |
|
|
$ |
1,843,418 |
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) during the period (net of deferred tax
benefit (expense) of $630,673, $(65,933), and $783,353,
respectively)
|
|
|
(1,399,661 |
) |
|
|
358,090 |
|
|
|
(3,393,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
1,485,328 |
|
|
$ |
1,843,418 |
|
|
$ |
(1,549,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
95,343,123 |
|
|
$ |
108,779,683 |
|
|
$ |
118,435,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
7,414,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,756,975 |
|
|
$ |
14,656,410 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (gains) losses on sale of investments
|
|
|
(3,139,907 |
) |
|
|
(208,135 |
) |
|
|
54,101 |
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
505,883 |
|
|
|
1,174,770 |
|
|
|
1,116,386 |
|
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, net
|
|
|
(3,409,574 |
) |
|
|
401,307 |
|
|
|
930,314 |
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable allowance
|
|
|
(1,122,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318,000 |
|
|
Impairment of notes receivable
|
|
|
3,900,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate impairment allowance
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium
|
|
|
928,757 |
|
|
|
2,450,153 |
|
|
|
2,326,835 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(3,456,444 |
) |
|
|
2,537,686 |
|
|
|
(2,063,916 |
) |
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
(912,803 |
) |
|
|
(536,772 |
) |
|
|
(729,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
(8,298,084 |
) |
|
|
6,850,698 |
|
|
|
3,778,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable and ceded unearned premiums
|
|
|
931,432 |
|
|
|
(16,883,317 |
) |
|
|
(40,196,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Funds held
|
|
|
(934,646 |
) |
|
|
3,383,326 |
|
|
|
2,856,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
50,940,161 |
|
|
|
91,519,976 |
|
|
|
73,248,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
28,263,973 |
|
|
|
(6,140,184 |
) |
|
|
6,442,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded premiums payable
|
|
|
8,654,275 |
|
|
|
(5,870,903 |
) |
|
|
4,653,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
240,457 |
|
|
|
1,109,634 |
|
|
|
(2,303,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
243,361 |
|
|
|
(1,817,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(840,610 |
) |
|
|
(2,891,671 |
) |
|
|
4,270,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
80,223,269 |
|
|
|
89,835,768 |
|
|
|
70,358,811 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed maturities
|
|
|
(189,680,363 |
) |
|
|
(107,194,605 |
) |
|
|
(150,861,495 |
) |
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(3,117,176 |
) |
|
|
(12,854,116 |
) |
|
|
(7,106,043 |
) |
Purchase of preferred stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500,900 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturities
|
|
|
68,628,271 |
|
|
|
32,172,791 |
|
|
|
64,219,528 |
|
Proceeds from sales of equity securities
|
|
|
612,080 |
|
|
|
1,380,010 |
|
|
|
1,195,954 |
|
Decrease (increase) in short-term investments
|
|
|
12,917,926 |
|
|
|
(20,217,314 |
) |
|
|
571,483 |
|
Decrease in notes receivable
|
|
|
989,518 |
|
|
|
1,435,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of investment in real estate
|
|
|
3,195,372 |
|
|
|
35,850,109 |
|
|
|
2,005,440 |
|
Purchases of fixed assets
|
|
|
(2,483,550 |
) |
|
|
(980,480 |
) |
|
|
(1,705,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(108,937,922 |
) |
|
|
(70,408,605 |
) |
|
|
(95,181,554 |
) |
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
26,998,725 |
|
|
|
638,495 |
|
|
|
1,218,455 |
|
Stock repurchase payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,485,209 |
) |
|
|
(2,945,714 |
) |
Proceeds from (repayment of) loan payable
|
|
|
8,259,075 |
|
|
|
(17,421,859 |
) |
|
|
24,996,193 |
|
Proceeds from redemption of escrow deposits
|
|
|
(5,572,681 |
) |
|
|
(9,091,347 |
) |
|
|
(144,500 |
) |
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(570,113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withdrawals from restricted cash, net
|
|
|
5,749,231 |
|
|
|
1,623,114 |
|
|
|
144,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
34,864,237 |
|
|
|
(26,736,806 |
) |
|
|
23,268,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
6,149,584 |
|
|
|
(7,309,643 |
) |
|
|
(1,553,809 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
26,003,795 |
|
|
|
32,153,379 |
|
|
|
24,843,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
32,153,379 |
|
|
$ |
24,843,736 |
|
|
$ |
23,289,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
6,693,941 |
|
|
$ |
3,525,270 |
|
|
$ |
287,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
581,868 |
|
|
$ |
1,121,713 |
|
|
$ |
983,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
7,414,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,756,975 |
|
|
$ |
14,656,410 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for sale, net
of minority interest of $(141,761), $(108,334) and$(259,129) for
2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
1,154,202 |
|
|
|
463,260 |
|
|
|
(4,541,890 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on hedging transactions
|
|
|
(95,953 |
) |
|
|
81,912 |
|
|
|
311,359 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses included
in net earnings, net of minority interest of $(51,324),
$(86,986) and $0 for 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively
|
|
|
(3,088,583 |
) |
|
|
(121,149 |
) |
|
|
54,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,030,334 |
) |
|
|
424,023 |
|
|
|
(4,176,430 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income, net of minority interest of $0 for 2003
and 2004 and $(5,534) for 2005 respectively
|
|
|
(630,673 |
) |
|
|
65,933 |
|
|
|
(783,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,399,661 |
) |
|
|
358,090 |
|
|
|
(3,393,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
6,014,749 |
|
|
$ |
15,115,065 |
|
|
$ |
11,263,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2004 and 2005
|
|
(1) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
(a) |
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of American
Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (American Safety)
and its subsidiaries and American Safety Risk Retention Group
Inc. (American Safety RRG), a non-subsidiary risk
retention group affiliate (collectively, the
Company) are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates,
based on the best information available, in recording
transactions resulting from business operations. The balance
sheet amounts that involve a greater extent of accounting
estimates and/or actuarial determinations subject to future
changes are the Companys invested assets, deferred income
taxes, and the liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses. As additional information becomes available (or actual
amounts are determinable), the recorded estimates may be revised
and reflected in operating results. While management believes
that these estimates are adequate, such estimates may change in
the future. |
|
|
(b) |
Description of Common Stock Voting and
Ownership Rights |
|
|
|
The authorized share capital of the Company is 20 million
shares, consisting of 15 million common shares, par value
$.01 per share (Common Shares), and
5 million preferred shares, par value $.01 per share
(Preferred Shares). The Common Shares are validly
issued, fully paid, and non-assessable. There are no provisions
of Bermuda law or the Companys Bye-Laws which impose any
limitations on the rights of shareholders to hold or
vote Common Shares by reason of such shareholders not being
residents of Bermuda. Holders of Common Shares are entitled to
receive dividends ratably when and as declared by the Board of
Directors out of funds legally available therefore. |
|
|
Each holder of Common Shares is entitled to one vote per share
on all matters submitted to a vote of the Companys
shareholders, subject to the 9.5% voting limitation described
below. All matters, including the election of directors, voted
upon at any duly held shareholders meeting shall be authorized
by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting by shareholders
represented in person or by proxy, except (i) approval of a
merger, consolidation or amalgamation; (ii) the sale,
lease, or exchange of all or substantially all of the assets of
the Company; and (iii) amendment of certain provisions of
the Bye-Laws, which each require the approval of at least
662/3
% of the outstanding voting shares (in addition to any
regulatory or court approvals). The Common Shares have non
cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of a
majority of the Common Shares may elect all of the directors of
the Company and, in such event, the holders of the remaining
shares will not be able to elect any directors. |
|
|
The Bye-Laws contain certain provisions that limit the voting
rights that may be exercised by certain holders of Common
Shares. The Bye-Laws provide that each holder of Common Shares
is entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a
vote of the Companys shareholders, except that if, and so
long as, the Controlled Shares (as defined below) of any person
constitute 9.5% or more of the issued and outstanding Common
Shares, the voting rights with respect to the Controlled Shares
owned by such person shall be limited, in the aggregate, to a
voting power of 9.5%, other than the voting rights of Frederick
C. Treadway or Treadway Associates, L.P., affiliates of a
founding shareholder of the Company. Controlled
Shares mean (i) all shares of the Company directly,
indirectly, or constructively owned by any person and
(ii) all shares of the Company directly, indirectly, or
beneficially owned by such person within the meaning of
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act (including any shares
owned by a group of persons, as so |
F-9
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
defined and including any shares that would otherwise be
excluded by the provisions of Section 13(d)(6) of the
Exchange Act). Under these provisions, if, and so long as, any
person directly, indirectly, or constructively owns Controlled
Shares having more than 9.5% of the total number of votes
exercisable in respect of all shares of voting stock of the
Company, the voting rights attributable to such shares will be
limited, in the aggregate, to 9.5% of the total number of votes. |
|
|
No holder of Common Shares of the Company shall, by reason only
of such holder, have any preemptive right to subscribe to any
additional issue of shares of any class or series nor to any
security convertible into such shares. |
|
|
(c) |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda
company, American Safety Reinsurance, Ltd.(American Safety
Re), American Safety Assurance Ltd., (ASA) two
100%-owned licensed Bermuda insurance companies, American Safety
Holdings Corp. (American Safety Holdings), a
100%-owned insurance holding company and American Safety Risk
Retention Group, Inc. (American Safety RRG), a
non-subsidiary risk retention group affiliate. American Safety
Holdings in turn wholly owns American Safety Casualty Insurance
Company (American Safety Casualty), a property and
casualty insurance company, American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. (ASI Services), an underwriting and
administrative subsidiary, Ponce Lighthouse Properties, Inc.
(Ponce), the development company of the Harbour
Village project, and Rivermar Contracting Company
(Rivermar), the general contractor of the Harbour
Village project. American Safety Casualty wholly owns American
Safety Indemnity Company, a property and casualty excess and
surplus lines insurance company. ASI Services wholly owns the
following subsidiaries: Sureco Bond Services, Inc.
(Sureco), a bonding agency; Environmental Claims
Services, Inc. (ECSI), a claims consulting firm;
American Safety Financial Corp., a financial services
subsidiary; and American Safety Purchasing Group, Inc., which
acts as a purchasing group for the placement of business with
American Safety Casualty. |
|
|
In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(VIEs) and FASB Interpretation No. 46 Revised
(FIN 46R), the accompanying financial statements
consolidate American Safety RRG, based on its status as VIE and
the Companys status as the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
A minority interest has been established for the equity holders
of American Safety RRG. The accompanying financial statements
also de-consolidate American Safety Capital Trust, American
Safety Capital Trust II and American Safety Capital
Trust III (American Safety Capital,
American Safety Capital II and American Safety
Capital III, respectively) based on their status as
variable interest special purpose entities of the Companys
status as not being the primary beneficiary. American Safety
Capital, American Safety Capital II and American Safety
Capital III are accounted for under the equity method. |
|
|
All significant intercompany balances have been eliminated, as
appropriate, in consolidation. |
|
|
|
The following is a description of certain risks facing the
Company and its subsidiaries: |
|
|
Legal/ Regulatory Risk is the risk that changes in the
legal or regulatory environment in which an insurer operates
will create additional expenses not anticipated by the insurer
in pricing its products and beyond those recorded in the
financial statements. That is, regulatory initiatives |
F-10
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
designed to reduce insurer profits or otherwise affecting the
industry in which the insurer operates, new legal theories or
insurance company insolvencies through guaranty fund
assessments, may create costs for the insurer beyond those
recorded in the financial statements. The Company attempts to
mitigate this risk by actively writing insurance business in
several states, thereby spreading this risk over a large
geographic area. |
|
|
The Potential Risk of United States Taxation of Bermuda
Operations. Under current Bermuda law, American Safety is
not required to pay any taxes in Bermuda on either income or
capital gains. American Safety has received an undertaking from
the Minister of Finance in Bermuda that will exempt American
Safety from taxation until the year 2016 in the event of any
such taxes being imposed. Whether a foreign corporation is
engaged in a United States trade or business or is carrying on
an insurance business in the United States depends upon the
level of activities conducted in the United States. If the
activities of a foreign company are continuous, regular,
and considerable, the foreign company will be deemed to be
engaged in a United States trade or business. Due to the fact
that American Safety will continue to maintain an office in
Bermuda and American Safetys, American Safety Res
and American Safety Assurances, sole business is
reinsuring contracts via treaty reinsurance agreements, which
are all signed outside of the United States, American Safety
does not consider itself to be engaged in a trade or business in
the United States and, accordingly, does not expect to be
subject to United States income taxes. This position is
consistent with the position taken by various other entities
that have similar operational structures as American Safety. |
|
|
However, because the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
the Treasury Regulations and court decisions do not definitively
identify activities that constitute being engaged in a United
States trade or business, and because of the factual nature of
the determination, there can be no assurance that the Internal
Revenue Service will not contend that American Safety or its
Bermuda insurance subsidiary are engaged in a United States
trade or business. In general, if American Safety or its Bermuda
insurance subsidiaries are considered to be engaged in a United
States trade or business, it would be subject to (i) United
States Federal income tax on its taxable income that is
effectively connected with a United States trade or business at
graduated rates and (ii) the 30 percent branch profits
tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits deemed
repatriated from the United States. Certain subsidiaries of
American Safety are, however subject to U.S. Federal and
state income tax, as they are domiciled and conduct business in
the United States. |
|
|
Credit Risk is the risk that issuers of securities owned
by the insurer or secured notes receivable will default or that
other parties, including reinsurers that have obligations to the
insurer, will not pay or perform. The Company attempts to
mitigate this risk by adhering to a conservative investment
strategy, by obtaining sufficient collateral for secured note
obligations and by maintaining sound reinsurance, credit and
collection policies. |
|
|
Interest Rate Risk is the risk that interest rates will
change and cause a decrease in the value of an insurers
investments. The Company attempts to mitigate this risk by
attempting to match the maturities of its assets with the
expected payouts of its liabilities. |
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities for which the Company has the positive
intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as
held to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.
Fixed maturity and equity securities that are bought and held
principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are
classified as trading and are reported at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.
Fixed maturity and equity securities not classified as either
held to |
F-11
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
maturity or trading are classified as available for
sale and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains
and losses (net of deferred taxes) charged or credited as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. |
|
|
While it is the Companys intent to hold fixed maturity
securities until the foreseeable future or until maturity, it
may sell such securities in response to, among other things,
market conditions, liquidity needs, or interest rate
fluctuations. At December 31, 2004 and 2005, the Company
considered all of its fixed maturity securities as
available-for-sale. |
|
|
Investment income is recorded as earned on the accrual basis and
includes amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
using the interest method. Realized gains or losses on disposal
of investments are determined on a specific identification basis
and are included in revenues. Investments in real estate are
carried at the lower of cost or fair value plus capitalized
development costs. Premiums and discounts arising from the
purchase of mortgage-backed securities are treated as yield
adjustments over their estimated lives. |
|
|
The Companys portfolio managers routinely monitor and
evaluate the difference between the cost and fair value of our
investments. Additionally, credit analysis and/or credit rating
issues related to specific investments may trigger more
intensive monitoring to determine if a decline in market value
is other than temporary. For investments with a market value
below cost, the process includes evaluating the length of time
and the extent to which cost exceeds market value, the prospects
and financial condition of the issuer, and evaluation for a
potential recovery in market value, among other factors. This
process is not exact and further requires consideration of risks
such as credit risk, which to a certain extent can be
controlled, and interest rate risk, which cannot be controlled.
Therefore, if an investments cost exceeds its market value
solely due to changes in interest rates, impairment may not be
appropriate. If, after monitoring and analysis, the Company
believes that a decline in fair value is other than temporary,
the Company adjusts the amortized cost of the security and
reports a realized loss in the consolidated statements of
earnings. |
|
|
(f) |
Recognition of Premium Income |
|
|
|
General liability premiums are estimated based upon the annual
revenues of the underlying insureds. Additional or return
premiums are recognized for differences between provisional
premiums billed and estimated ultimate general liability
premiums due when the final audit is complete after the policy
has expired. General liability, surety, commercial auto, other
commercial lines and workers compensation premiums are
recorded ratably over the policy period with unearned premium
calculated on a pro rata basis over the lives of the underlying
coverages. |
|
|
(g) |
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs |
|
|
|
The costs of acquiring business, primarily commissions and
premium tax expenses, are deferred (to the extent they are
recoverable from future premium income) and amortized to
earnings in relation to the amount of premiums earned. If
necessary, investment income is considered in the determination
of the recoverability of deferred policy acquisition costs.
Deferred revenue results when reinsurance ceding commissions
received exceed the related deferred acquisition costs for
direct and assumed business. |
F-12
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
An analysis of deferred policy acquisition costs follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
8,550,919 |
|
|
$ |
11,960,495 |
|
|
$ |
11,559,188 |
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
25,227,293 |
|
|
|
26,127,415 |
|
|
|
27,581,361 |
|
Costs amortized during the period
|
|
|
(21,817,717 |
) |
|
|
(26,528,722 |
) |
|
|
(28,511,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
11,960,495 |
|
|
$ |
11,559,188 |
|
|
$ |
10,628,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses |
|
|
|
The Company provides a liability for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses based upon aggregate case estimates for
reported claims and estimates for incurred but not reported
losses. Because of the length of time required for the ultimate
liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses to be
determined for certain lines of business underwritten, the
Company has limited experience upon which to base an estimate of
the ultimate liability. For these lines, management has
established loss and loss adjustment expense reserves based on
actuarial methods that determine ultimate losses and loss
adjustment expenses utilizing a combination of both industry and
the Companys reporting and settlement patterns, as
appropriate. One primary set of actuarial methods utilized,
Bornhuetter-Ferguson, entails developing an initial expected
loss ratio based upon gross ultimate losses from prior accident
years, estimating the portion of ultimate losses expected to be
reported and unreported, and adding the actual reported losses
to the expected unreported losses to derive the indicated
ultimate losses. However, the net amounts that will ultimately
be paid to settle the liability may be more or less than the
estimated amounts provided. |
|
|
|
For subsidiaries subject to taxation, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date. |
|
|
|
Reinsurance contracts do not relieve the Company from its
obligation to policyholders. Failure of reinsurers to honor
their obligations could result in losses to the Company. The
Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and
monitors concentration of credit risk to minimize its exposure
to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies. Reinsurance
recoverables on unpaid losses and prepaid reinsurance represent
amounts recoverable from reinsurers for unpaid losses and
unearned ceded reinsurance premiums, respectively. |
|
|
(k) |
Goodwill and Intangibles |
|
|
|
The Company adopted SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. Under
SFAS 142, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets
are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more
frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Prior
to adoption, the Company amortized goodwill |
F-13
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
over a 20 year period. Separable intangible assets that are
not deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be
amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). |
|
|
At December 31, 2004 and 2005, the Company had $1,467,000
of goodwill. |
|
|
In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 142
goodwill and intangibles there was no amortization recorded in
net income for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and
2005 respectively. |
|
|
(l) |
Net Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share are
computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number
of shares outstanding for the period (basic EPS) plus dilutive
shares subject to stock options (diluted EPS). |
|
|
Earnings per share are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
5,105,770 |
|
|
|
6,863,619 |
|
|
|
6,736,938 |
|
Shares attributable to stock options
|
|
|
127,946 |
|
|
|
479,260 |
|
|
|
426,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalents
|
|
|
5,233,716 |
|
|
|
7,342,879 |
|
|
|
7,163,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
|
(m) |
Employee Stock Options |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the Company had an employee stock
option plan, which is described more fully in Note 13. The
Company applies the recognition and measurement principles of
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations in accounting to the
plan. No compensation expense is reflected in net earnings as
all options granted under the stock option plan have an exercise
price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock
on the date of grant. The majority of options in the plan vest
evenly over a three year period. The following table illustrates
the effect on net earnings and earnings per share, |
F-14
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
assuming the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123R Accounting for Share Based Payments had
been applied. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per | |
|
|
share amounts) | |
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
7,414 |
|
|
$ |
14,757 |
|
|
$ |
14,656 |
|
|
Effect of stock options
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$ |
7,226 |
|
|
$ |
14,558 |
|
|
$ |
14,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
|
(n) |
Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
During the last two years, the Financial Accounting Standard
Board (FASB) has issued a number of accounting
pronouncements with various effective dates. |
|
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued a revised version of
SFAS 123, SFAS 123(R), Share- Based Payments, which
finalizes the accounting for stock options. The statement
requires that compensation related to share based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements. The cost
will be measured based on the grant date fair value of the
equity instrument issued. The Company plans to adopt
SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006. |
|
|
In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position Number
FAS 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
and Its Application to Certain Investments (FSP 115-1). FSP
115-1 addresses the determination as to when an investment is
considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than
temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. It also
includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition
of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain
disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been
recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in
FSP 115-1 amends FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and was
effective January 1, 2006. |
|
|
(o) |
Revenue Recognition of Real Estate |
|
|
|
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of real estate when
the title to each individual unit or boat slip passes to the
purchaser. When the title passes, the Company uses a percentage
of completion method, based on the ratio of actual costs to
total estimated costs (including allocated common costs that may
not yet have been expended) to recognize revenue. The revenue
recognized relates only to units and boat slips that have closed
that meet the criteria in paragraph 37 for SFAS 66,
Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. The actual and estimated
costs refer to costs that are allocated to each individual unit
or boat slip. The difference between total sales price and the
revenue recognized is set up as deferred revenue and is
recognized as the additional costs of each unit are incurred.
Please see Note 3 herein for more information regarding the
Companys real estate operations. |
F-15
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(p) |
Capitalizing Costs on Real Estate |
|
|
|
The Company capitalizes the following costs with respect to real
estate: (a) project costs, which include acquisition,
design and planning costs, and construction costs, all of which
are directly associated with the project; (b) taxes and
insurance incurred during the planning, design and construction
periods; (c) costs of amenities (since these items will
transfer to an owners association at no charge when the
project is complete); (d) interest costs on qualifying
assets until the assets are ready for their intended use; and
(e) indirect costs of construction management and
supervision. |
|
|
(q) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, money market
instruments and other debt instruments with a maturity of
90 days or less when purchased. |
|
|
|
The Company has limited activity with derivative financial
instruments. They are not used for trading purposes, nor does
the Company engage in leveraged derivative transactions. At
December 31, 2005, the Companys outstanding
derivative contracts were interest swaps related to certain of
its trust preferred obligations. See note 8. The Company
recognizes unrealized gain or loss on these interest rate swaps
as interest rates change. |
|
|
|
Certain items in the prior periods financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. In
2005 the Company changed its segment presentation, see
Note 10. |
|
|
|
Net investment income is summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
5,735,889 |
|
|
$ |
9,695,664 |
|
|
$ |
13,567,965 |
|
Common stock securities
|
|
|
12,264 |
|
|
|
195,009 |
|
|
|
367,697 |
|
Preferred stock securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,149 |
|
Short-term investments and cash
|
|
|
337,367 |
|
|
|
298,305 |
|
|
|
914,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,085,520 |
|
|
|
10,188,978 |
|
|
|
14,872,982 |
|
Less investment expenses
|
|
|
284,984 |
|
|
|
416,256 |
|
|
|
557,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
5,800,536 |
|
|
$ |
9,772,722 |
|
|
$ |
14,315,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
3,125,760 |
|
|
$ |
182,336 |
|
|
$ |
91,077 |
|
|
Common stock securities
|
|
|
57,806 |
|
|
|
118,952 |
|
|
|
154,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains
|
|
|
3,183,566 |
|
|
|
301,288 |
|
|
|
245,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
|
(36,756 |
) |
|
|
(66,977 |
) |
|
|
(250,383 |
) |
|
Common stock securities
|
|
|
(6,903 |
) |
|
|
(26,176 |
) |
|
|
(49,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses
|
|
|
(43,659 |
) |
|
|
(93,153 |
) |
|
|
(300,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
$ |
3,139,907 |
|
|
$ |
208,135 |
|
|
$ |
(54,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
(2,493,177 |
) |
|
$ |
(758,834 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,496,515 |
) |
|
Common stock securities
|
|
|
173,806 |
|
|
|
905,625 |
|
|
|
643,499 |
|
|
Preferred stock securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
$ |
(2,319,371 |
) |
|
$ |
146,791 |
|
|
$ |
(4,746,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 and 2005, the Company did not hold
fixed-maturity securities, which individually exceeded 10% of
shareholders equity, except U.S. government, and
government agency securities. |
F-17
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments at
December 31, 2004 and 2005 are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies
|
|
$ |
65,887,315 |
|
|
$ |
800,811 |
|
|
$ |
467,383 |
|
|
$ |
66,220,743 |
|
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
31,067,197 |
|
|
|
425,269 |
|
|
|
168,348 |
|
|
|
31,324,118 |
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
90,742,305 |
|
|
|
1,618,821 |
|
|
|
650,822 |
|
|
|
91,710,304 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
97,243,632 |
|
|
|
306,453 |
|
|
|
747,761 |
|
|
|
96,802,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
284,940,449 |
|
|
$ |
3,151,354 |
|
|
$ |
2,034,314 |
|
|
$ |
286,057,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
14,001,929 |
|
|
$ |
1,455,131 |
|
|
$ |
375,700 |
|
|
$ |
15,081,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies
|
|
$ |
86,740,033 |
|
|
$ |
547,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,311,628 |
|
|
$ |
85,976,073 |
|
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
64,740,408 |
|
|
|
386,303 |
|
|
|
498,465 |
|
|
|
64,628,246 |
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
84,763,525 |
|
|
|
618,765 |
|
|
|
1,598,413 |
|
|
|
83,783,877 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
132,992,335 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
|
|
2,579,971 |
|
|
|
130,468,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
369,236,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,609,002 |
|
|
$ |
5,988,477 |
|
|
$ |
364,856,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
19,983,174 |
|
|
$ |
2,721,304 |
|
|
$ |
998,374 |
|
|
$ |
21,706,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$ |
3,500,900 |
|
|
$ |
106,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,607,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of fixed maturities
at December 31, 2005, by contractual maturity are shown
below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities as certain borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Estimated Fair | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
36,205,149 |
|
|
$ |
35,833,780 |
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
108,950,946 |
|
|
|
107,332,422 |
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
54,520,516 |
|
|
|
53,864,556 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
36,567,355 |
|
|
|
37,357,439 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
132,992,335 |
|
|
|
130,468,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
369,236,301 |
|
|
$ |
364,856,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Bonds with an amortized cost of $24,206,791 and $34,405,204 were
on deposit with insurance regulatory authorities at
December 31, 2004 and 2005 in accordance with statutory
requirements. |
|
|
The fair value of the investments in debt securities can
fluctuate greatly as a result of changes in interest rates. The
Company believes that the declines in fair value noted below
primarily resulted from changes in interest rates rather then
credit issues. |
|
|
Therefore, the Company has no concern regarding the ultimate
collectibility of the security value, and accordingly, has not
recorded any impairment write-down. The tables below show the
securities the Company is holding which have been held at a loss
for less than 12 months and greater than 12 months at
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005 respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
12 Months or Longer | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury Securities & other government corp and
agencies
|
|
$ |
34,809,793 |
|
|
$ |
(235,002 |
) |
|
$ |
5,228,784 |
|
|
$ |
(232,381 |
) |
|
$ |
40,038,577 |
|
|
$ |
(467,383 |
) |
States of the US and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
9,673,457 |
|
|
|
(85,510 |
) |
|
|
6,793,847 |
|
|
|
(82,838 |
) |
|
|
16,467,304 |
|
|
|
(168,348 |
) |
Corporate securities
|
|
|
38,933,122 |
|
|
|
(413,969 |
) |
|
|
7,147,250 |
|
|
|
(236,853 |
) |
|
|
46,080,372 |
|
|
|
(650,822 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
31,599,014 |
|
|
|
(145,174 |
) |
|
|
19,610,565 |
|
|
|
(602,587 |
) |
|
|
51,209,579 |
|
|
|
(747,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal, fixed maturities
|
|
|
115,015,386 |
|
|
|
(879,655 |
) |
|
|
38,780,446 |
|
|
|
(1,154,659 |
) |
|
|
153,795,832 |
|
|
|
(2,034,314 |
) |
Common stock
|
|
|
3,163,470 |
|
|
|
(339,797 |
) |
|
|
165,743 |
|
|
|
(35,903 |
) |
|
|
3,329,213 |
|
|
|
(375,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
118,178,856 |
|
|
$ |
(1,219,452 |
) |
|
$ |
38,946,189 |
|
|
$ |
(1,190,562 |
) |
|
$ |
157,125,045 |
|
|
$ |
(2,410,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
12 Months or Longer | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Treasury Securities & other government corp and
agencies
|
|
$ |
39,303,992 |
|
|
$ |
(546,902 |
) |
|
$ |
25,829,191 |
|
|
$ |
(764,727 |
) |
|
$ |
65,133,183 |
|
|
$ |
(1,311,628 |
) |
States of the US and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
27,795,435 |
|
|
|
(329,164 |
) |
|
|
5,921,758 |
|
|
|
(169,302 |
) |
|
|
33,717,193 |
|
|
|
(498,465 |
) |
Corporate securities
|
|
|
30,765,595 |
|
|
|
(614,456 |
) |
|
|
34,496,894 |
|
|
|
(983,957 |
) |
|
|
65,262,490 |
|
|
|
(1,598,413 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
85,185,338 |
|
|
|
(1,360,455 |
) |
|
|
34,261,657 |
|
|
|
(1,219,516 |
) |
|
|
119,446,995 |
|
|
|
(2,579,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal, fixed maturities
|
|
|
183,050,361 |
|
|
|
(2,850,976 |
) |
|
|
100,509,500 |
|
|
|
(3,137,501 |
) |
|
|
283,559,861 |
|
|
|
(5,988,477 |
) |
Common stock
|
|
|
4,590,179 |
|
|
|
(502,397 |
) |
|
|
1,994,090 |
|
|
|
(495,977 |
) |
|
|
6,584,269 |
|
|
|
(998,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
187,640,540 |
|
|
$ |
(3,353,372 |
) |
|
$ |
102,503,590 |
|
|
$ |
(3,633,479 |
) |
|
$ |
290,144,130 |
|
|
$ |
(6,986,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Investment in Real Estate |
|
|
|
The Companys investment in real estate is known as Harbour
Village Golf and Yacht Club (Harbour Village)
comprised of 173 acres of property in Ponce Inlet, Florida
that was acquired in |
F-19
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
foreclosure during April 1999. At the date of foreclosure the
Company evaluated the carrying value of its investment in real
estate by comparing the fair value of the foreclosed collateral
to the book value of the underlying loan and accrued interest.
As the book value of the loan and accrued interest was less than
the fair value of the collateral, no loss was recognized on
foreclosure and the book balance of the loan and accrued
interest became the basis of the real estate. |
|
|
The Harbour Village project is substantially complete as all
units are sold and closed. The Company does not expect to engage
in any further real estate activities. No additional revenue
from Harbour Village is expected. There will be some ongoing
expenses for the project associated with legal, insurance and
other matters. |
|
|
(4) |
Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
The carrying amounts for short-term investments, cash, premiums
receivable, commissions receivable, accrued investment income,
ceded premiums payable, funds held, collateral held and accounts
payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due
to the short-term nature of these instruments. |
|
|
Estimated fair values for fixed maturities were provided by
outside consultants using market quotations, prices provided by
market makers or estimates of fair values obtained from yield
data relating to investment securities with similar
characteristics. |
|
|
|
The Company has excess of loss reinsurance treaties with various
reinsurers for the Companys general liability line of
business. These treaties provide varying levels of reinsurance
protection depending on the date the underlying insurance policy
was written. |
|
|
|
The Company previously had excess of loss treaties with various
reinsurers for the Companys construction line of business.
These treaties provide varying levels of reinsurance protection
depending on the date the underlying insurance policy was
written. |
|
|
Effective July 1, 2005, the Company discontinued purchasing
excess of loss reinsurance on our construction insurance
business. The Company made this decision after performing a loss
cost and dynamic financial analysis and concluding that our
reinsurance purchases were uneconomical. The Company believes
that retaining this exposure and not ceding a large percentage
of premiums to the reinsurance market will enhance our balance
sheet. |
|
|
|
For our surety business, we entered into a quota share
reinsurance treaty during the second quarter of 2004 which
provides reinsurance for a single bond limit not to exceed
$3.0 million, subject to a maximum for any one principal of
$6.0 million. We retain a 50% participation in this treaty
with the balance reinsured by unaffiliated reinsurers. |
F-20
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
|
|
|
The Companys program business division buys various forms
of reinsurance on both a quota share basis as well as an excess
of loss basis. These treaties cover the majority of risks
written by the Company in this division. Where appropriate,
collateral is obtained from the reinsurers to secure their
obligations. |
|
|
|
The Company has excess of loss treaties with various reinsurers.
These treaties provide varying levels of reinsurance protection
depending on the date the underlying insurance policy was
written. |
|
|
The approximate effects of reinsurance on the financial
statement accounts listed below are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Written premiums:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$ |
203,586 |
|
|
$ |
221,733 |
|
|
$ |
237,961 |
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
9,081 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(81,189 |
) |
|
|
(89,655 |
) |
|
|
(97,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$ |
131,478 |
|
|
$ |
131,921 |
|
|
$ |
140,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$ |
175,916 |
|
|
$ |
223,715 |
|
|
$ |
231,518 |
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
8,486 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(75,068 |
) |
|
|
(91,324 |
) |
|
|
(92,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$ |
109,334 |
|
|
$ |
136,391 |
|
|
$ |
138,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$ |
119,114 |
|
|
$ |
153,167 |
|
|
$ |
159,668 |
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
7,309 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(60,589 |
) |
|
|
(64,043 |
) |
|
|
(77,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$ |
65,834 |
|
|
$ |
93,503 |
|
|
$ |
84,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$ |
218,741 |
|
|
$ |
307,185 |
|
|
$ |
379,332 |
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
11,363 |
|
|
|
14,438 |
|
|
|
15,541 |
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(115,061 |
) |
|
|
(137,583 |
) |
|
|
(160,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$ |
115,043 |
|
|
$ |
184,040 |
|
|
$ |
233,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Total income tax expense for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005 was allocated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Tax expense attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
2,675,375 |
|
|
$ |
3,695,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,391,747 |
|
Unrealized gain on hedging transactions
|
|
|
32,624 |
|
|
|
27,851 |
|
|
|
105,861 |
|
Unrealized gain (losses) on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(663,297 |
) |
|
|
38,082 |
|
|
|
(894,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,044,702 |
|
|
$ |
3,761,883 |
|
|
$ |
602,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal and state income tax expense (benefit) from
continuing operations consists of the following components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
6,323,726 |
|
|
$ |
2,300,361 |
|
|
$ |
3,455,663 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(3,648,351 |
) |
|
|
1,395,589 |
|
|
|
(2,063,916 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,675,375 |
|
|
$ |
3,695,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,391,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The state income tax components aggregated $213,718, $677,840
and $307,485 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004
and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
Income tax expense from continuing operations for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 differed from the
amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax
rate of 34% to earnings before Federal income taxes as a result
of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected income tax
|
|
$ |
3,430,527 |
|
|
$ |
6,273,995 |
|
|
$ |
5,456,373 |
|
Foreign earned income not subject to direct taxation
|
|
|
(540,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,132,853 |
) |
|
|
(3,488,277 |
) |
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554,515 |
) |
State taxes and other
|
|
|
(215,152 |
) |
|
|
554,808 |
|
|
|
(21,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax
|
|
$ |
2,675,375 |
|
|
$ |
3,695,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,391,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes are based upon temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities. The following deferred taxes are recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserve discounting
|
|
$ |
7,565,625 |
|
|
$ |
9,288,244 |
|
|
Unearned premium reserves
|
|
|
3,145,646 |
|
|
|
3,118,965 |
|
|
Difference between tax and GAAP basis of Harbour Village project
|
|
|
366,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference between tax and GAAP method of Harbour Village project
|
|
|
146,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
282,556 |
|
|
|
154,980 |
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,823 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
611,443 |
|
|
|
348,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
12,118,356 |
|
|
|
13,411,021 |
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(554,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets after valuation allowance
|
|
|
11,563,841 |
|
|
|
13,411,021 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
2,033,536 |
|
|
|
1,477,230 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
288,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL Carryforward
|
|
|
(88,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
249,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
2,482,851 |
|
|
|
1,477,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
9,080,990 |
|
|
$ |
11,933,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes it is more likely than not that it will
realize the full benefit of the deferred tax assets; therefore,
a valuation allowance has not been established against these
assets. However, given the historical loss position of American
Safety RRG (RRG), it had established a 100% valuation allowance
on its net deferred tax assets totaling $554,515 at
December 31, 2004. In 2005, RRG reduced income tax expense
by reversing this valuation allowance as the realizability of
the deferred tax assets changed due to RRGs profitability.
This reduction in income tax expense was offset by an increase
in minority interest expense and had no overall effect on the
earnings or shareholders equity of the Company. |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with GAAP which vary in certain respects, for the
Company, American Safety Casualty, American Safety Indemnity and
American Safety RRG, from statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities. Statutory
accounting practices include state laws, regulations, and
general administrative rules, as well as a variety of
publications of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (the NAIC). In its March 1998 meeting,
the NAIC membership adopted the Codification of Statutory
Accounting Principles Project (the Codification) as
the NAIC-supported basis of accounting. The Codification was
approved with a provision allowing for commissioner discretion in |
F-23
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
determining appropriate statutory accounting for insurers.
Accordingly, such discretion will continue to allow prescribed
or permitted accounting practices that may differ from state to
state. |
|
|
The maximum amount of dividends the Companys insurance
subsidiaries can pay out without prior written approval from the
subsidiaries domicile state insurance commissioners, is
limited to the greater of 10% of surplus as regards to
policyholders or net income, excluding realized capital gains of
the preceding year. Dividends are also limited to the amount of
unassigned surplus. |
|
|
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (the
NAIC) has established risk-based capital
(RBC) requirements to help state regulators monitor
the financial strength and stability of property and casualty
insurers by identifying those companies that may be inadequately
capitalized. Under the NAICs requirements, each insurer
must maintain its total capital above a calculated threshold or
take corrective measures to achieve the threshold. The threshold
of adequate capital is based on a formula that takes into
account the amount of risk each company faces on its products
and investments. The RBC formula takes into consideration four
major areas of risk: (i) asset risk which primarily focuses
on the quality of investments; (ii) insurance risk which
encompasses coverage-related issues and anticipated frequency
and severity of losses when pricing and designing insurance
coverages; (iii) interest rate risk which involves
asset/liability matching issues; and (iv) other business
risks. |
|
|
American Safety Casualty, American Safety Indemnity and American
Safety RRG have calculated their RBC level and have determined
that their capital and surplus is in excess of threshold
requirements. |
|
|
The Bermuda Insurance Act of 1978 and related regulations (the
Act) requires American Safety Re to meet a minimum
solvency margin. American Safety Res statutory capital and
surplus as of December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 was
$19,333,539, $30,292,863 and $38,586,734, respectively, and the
amounts required to be maintained by the Company were $7,530,329
$9,576,055 and $12,868,524, respectively. American Safety
Assurance, Ltd (ASA) capital and surplus as of December 31,
2004 and 2005 was $44,646 and $1,480,424 respectively. ASA is
required to maintain a minimum of $120,000 in capital. In
addition, a minimum liquidity ratio must be maintained whereby
relevant assets, as defined by the Act, must exceed 75% of
relevant liabilities. Once these requirements have been met,
there is no restriction on the remaining retained earnings
available for distribution. |
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Offerings |
|
|
|
During 2003 American Safety Capital and American Safety
Capital II, both non-consolidated, wholly-owned
subsidiaries of the Company, issued $8 million and
$5 million, respectively, of variable rate
30-year trust preferred
securities. The proceeds are being used by the Company to
support the growth of its insurance business. The securities
require interest payments on a quarterly basis calculated at a
floating rate of LIBOR + 4.2% and LIBOR + 3.95% for American
Safety Capital and American Safety Capital II,
respectively. The securities can be redeemed by the Company
commencing five years from the date of original issuance. |
|
|
During 2005, the American Safety Capital Trust III a
non-consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued
a 30-year trust
preferred obligation in the amount of $25 million. This
obligation bears a fixed interest rate of 8.31% for the first
five years and LIBOR plus 3.4% thereafter. Interest is payable
on a quarterly basis and the securities may be called at the
Companys option in five years. |
F-24
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
The underlying debt obligations between the Company and American
Safety Capital and American Safety Capital II expose the
Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in
interest rates. Management entered into an interest rate swap
for these trust preferred offerings to manage that variability.
Under each interest rate swap, the Company receives variable
interest payments and makes fixed interest rate payments to the
applicable capital trust entity, thereby creating fixed rate
long-term debt. The overall effective fixed rate expense as a
result of this hedge is 7.1% and 7.6% for American Safety
Capital and American Safety Capital II, respectively, over
the first five years of the obligation. |
|
|
Interest expense for the twelve months ended December 31,
2004 and December 31, 2005 includes no gains or losses from
the interest rate swaps. Changes in fair value of the interest
rate swaps designated as hedging instruments of the variability
of cash flow associated with a floating rate, long-term debt
obligation are reported in accumulated other comprehensive
income. The gross unrealized gains and (losses) on the interest
rate swaps at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2005
were $192,589 and $347,481 for American Safety Capital and
$(14,724) and $141,742 for American Safety Capital II,
respectively. The interest rate swaps are 100% effective at
December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
The Company has trust preferreds payable totaling $37,810,099
that mature after 2010. |
|
|
(9) |
Related Party and Affiliate Transactions |
|
|
|
ASI Services, American Safetys underwriting and
administrative services subsidiary, leases office space from an
entity which is owned by certain directors, officers and
shareholders of the Company. The lease commenced on
March 1, 2001 and expires on August 31, 2007. The
Company paid rent of $533,093 and $512,666 in 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
|
|
The Company initially segregates its business into the following
segments: Real Estate Operations, Insurance Operations, and
Other. The Insurance Operations segment is further classified
into three additional lines: Excess and Surplus Lines (E&S),
Alternative Risk Transfer (ART), and Runoff lines. The E&S
lines is then further classified into three reportable lines of
business: Environmental Specialty (Env.), Construction (Const.),
and Surety. ART is then further classified into two reportable
lines of business: Specialty Programs (Programs) and Fully
Funded (FF). |
|
|
Real estate consists of the Harbour Village project in Ponce
Inlet, Florida as discussed in Note 3 herein. |
|
|
In our E&S line, Environmental Specialty writes insurance
coverages for the environmental remediation industry.
Construction provides commercial casualty insurance coverages,
generally in the area of construction and products liability.
Surety provides payment and performance bonds to the
environmental remediation industry. |
|
|
In our ART line, Specialty Programs facilitates the offering of
insurance to homogeneous niche groups of risks. Fully funded
provides a mechanism for insureds to post collateral and
self-insure their risks. We are paid a fee for arranging this
type of transaction. |
|
|
The Other segment consists of amounts associated with realized
gains and losses on investments and also for rescission expenses. |
F-25
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
The Company measures all segments using net income, total assets
and total equity. The Reportable Insurance Operations segments
are measured by net premiums earned, incurred losses and loss
adjustment expenses and acquisition expenses. Assets are not
allocated to the Reportable Insurance Operations segments. The
following table presents key financial data by segment for years
ended December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S | |
|
ART | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
Estate | |
|
Env. | |
|
Const. | |
|
Surety | |
|
Programs | |
|
FF | |
|
Runoff | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,603 |
|
|
|
85,793 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
73,152 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,667 |
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,233 |
|
|
|
73,572 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,478 |
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,446 |
|
|
|
57,379 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,334 |
|
Loss & loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,361 |
|
|
|
34,440 |
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,834 |
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,441 |
|
|
|
12,413 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,818 |
|
Underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,644 |
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
5,279 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(1,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,682 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
|
|
7,414 |
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
53,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
514,260 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
15,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
95,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S | |
|
ART | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Estate | |
|
Env. | |
|
Const. | |
|
Surety | |
|
Programs | |
|
FF | |
|
Runoff | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,157 |
|
|
|
96,905 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
76,264 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,575 |
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,024 |
|
|
|
77,894 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,921 |
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,152 |
|
|
|
79,781 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
16,516 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,391 |
|
Loss & loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,094 |
|
|
|
56,131 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
10,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,503 |
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,729 |
|
|
|
17,767 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,528 |
|
Underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,329 |
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,360 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,368) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
7,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
14,757 |
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
8,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
584,160 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
108,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S | |
|
ART | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Estate | |
|
Env. | |
|
Const. | |
|
Surety | |
|
Programs | |
|
FF | |
|
Runoff | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,014 |
|
|
|
95,406 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
85,138 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,880 |
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,477 |
|
|
|
78,026 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,552 |
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,081 |
|
|
|
81,908 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
18,297 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,536 |
|
Loss & loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,253 |
|
|
|
51,925 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
10,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,406 |
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
17,745 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,512 |
|
Underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
12,238 |
|
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
(3,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,618 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
14,656 |
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697,135 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,435 |
|
F-26
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Additionally, the Company conducts business in the following
geographic segments: United States and Bermuda. Significant
differences exist in the regulatory environment in each country.
Those differences include laws regarding the measurable
information about the insurance geographic segments for the
years ended December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005 (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
United States | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
7,414 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
410,177 |
|
|
|
104,083 |
|
|
|
514,260 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
50,445 |
|
|
|
44,898 |
|
|
|
95,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
United States | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
5,543 |
|
|
|
9,214 |
|
|
|
14,757 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
449,322 |
|
|
|
134,838 |
|
|
|
584,160 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
56,126 |
|
|
|
52,654 |
|
|
|
108,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
United States | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
10,260 |
|
|
|
14,656 |
|
Assets
|
|
|
529,768 |
|
|
|
167,367 |
|
|
|
697,135 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
59,002 |
|
|
|
59,433 |
|
|
|
118,435 |
|
|
|
(11) |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 and 2005, the Company had aggregate
outstanding irrevocable letters of credit which had not been
drawn amounting to $2,000,000 in favor of the Vermont Department
of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care
Administration. Investments in the amount of $2,000,000 have
been pledged as collateral to the issuing bank. |
F-27
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(12) |
Liability for Unpaid Loss and Loss Adjustment
Expenses |
|
|
|
Activity in the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment
expenses is summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, January 1
|
|
$ |
179,164 |
|
|
$ |
230,104 |
|
|
$ |
321,623 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses January 1
|
|
|
109,543 |
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
137,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, January 1
|
|
|
69,621 |
|
|
|
115,043 |
|
|
|
184,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
60,598 |
|
|
|
79,101 |
|
|
|
81,800 |
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
14,402 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred
|
|
|
65,834 |
|
|
|
93,503 |
|
|
|
84,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
17,922 |
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
|
|
31,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid
|
|
|
20,412 |
|
|
|
24,506 |
|
|
|
34,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, December 31
|
|
|
115,043 |
|
|
|
184,040 |
|
|
|
233,978 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss adjustment
expenses, December 31
|
|
|
115,061 |
|
|
|
137,583 |
|
|
|
160,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses, December 31
|
|
$ |
230,104 |
|
|
$ |
321,623 |
|
|
$ |
394,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reserve development for prior years for 2003, 2004 and 2005
occurred in the following business lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Excess and Surplus Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
(754 |
) |
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
Alternative Risk Transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Runoff
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
14,402 |
|
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction line reserve development in 2005 for prior years
was primarily attributable to the commutation of reinsurance
contracts with a former reinsurer. This transaction resulted in
the Company recognizing losses of $1.0 million. In 2005,
the runoff lines reserve development for prior years was
due to $1.2 million of increases in reserves on the
Companys excess municipality program. Construction line
reserve development in 2004 was attributable to developing
losses on |
F-28
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(i) certain New York contractor risks written in 2001 and
(ii) a change in actuarial reserving methodologies to
reflect risk categories. Exposure to New York contractor risks
was significantly reduced during 2002 and 2003. |
|
|
Management continually attempts to improve its loss estimation
process by refining its ability to analyze loss development
patterns, claims payments and other information, but many
reasons remain for potential adverse development of estimated
ultimate liabilities. For example, the uncertainties inherent in
the loss estimation process have become increasingly subject to
changes in legal trends. In recent years, this trend has
expanded the liability of insureds, established new liabilities
and reinterpreted contracts to provide unanticipated coverage
long after the related policies were written. Such changes from
past experience significantly affect the ability of insurers to
estimate the liabilities for unpaid losses and related expenses. |
|
|
Management recognizes the higher variability associated with
certain exposures and books of business and considers this
factor when establishing liabilities for losses. Management
currently believes the Companys gross and net liabilities
are adequate. |
|
|
The net liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses
maintained by the Companys insurance subsidiaries are
equal under both statutory accounting practices and GAAP. |
|
|
|
The Companys stock option plan grants incentive stock
options to employees. The options have a term of 10 years.
The exercise price is equal to the fair market value at the date
of grant. The majority of our options generally vest over three
years. At December 31, 2005, 430,627 shares were
available for future grants. |
|
|
The intrinsic value method is used to value stock options in
accordance with APB No. 25. Under this method, we do not
recognize compensation cost for stock options provided the
option price equals fair market value at the date of grant.
Under the terms of the stock option plan, the exercise price is
equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. |
F-29
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
The following table shows the stock option activity for the
Company during 2003, 2004 and 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Option Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
958,350 |
|
|
$ |
8.34 |
|
2003 activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
307,000 |
|
|
|
8.85 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(253,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,010,050 |
|
|
$ |
7.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
136,500 |
|
|
|
13.68 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(77,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(20,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,048,781 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
16.26 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(165,768 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(32,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
881,433 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 1,010,050 outstanding options at December 31, 2003,
636,550 were exercisable. |
|
|
Of the 1,048,781 outstanding options at December 31, 2004,
633,615 were exercisable. |
|
|
Of the 881,433 outstanding options at December 31, 2005,
599,183 were exercisable. |
F-30
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Grant | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Life | |
|
Price | |
|
Year | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$11.00
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
11.00 |
|
9.50
|
|
|
63,450 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
9.50 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
63,450 |
|
|
|
9.50 |
|
6.00
|
|
|
51,900 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
51,900 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
6.00
|
|
|
258,000 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
258,000 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
8.85
|
|
|
64,416 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
8.85 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
64,416 |
|
|
|
8.85 |
|
6.75
|
|
|
65,584 |
|
|
|
9.04 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
46,056 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
8.57
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
9.46 |
|
|
|
8.57 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
8.57 |
|
11.20
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7.54 |
|
|
|
11.20 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
11.20 |
|
13.62
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
8.42 |
|
|
|
13.62 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
13.62 |
|
13.77
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
13.67
|
|
|
90,583 |
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
13.67 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
36,194 |
|
|
|
13.67 |
|
15.99
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
9.08 |
|
|
|
15.99 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.72
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
16.72 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.18
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
|
16.18 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.00-16.72
|
|
|
881,433 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,183 |
|
|
$ |
7.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the pro-forma information presented in Note 1(m), the
fair value of each option granted during 2003, 2004 and 2005 was
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes multiple
option approach with the following assumptions: dividend yield
of 0.0% in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively; expected
volatility of 41.80%, 41.33% and 39.29% in 2003, 2004 and 2005,
respectively; risk-free interest rate of 3.5% for 2003 through
2005 and expected life from the grant dates ranging from
0.50 years to 10.00 years. |
|
|
The Company expects to grant additional awards in future years.
The Company granted options in 2003, 2004 and 2005 at an amount
deemed to be fair market value at the date of grant. See
Note 1(m) for more information. |
|
|
|
The Company, through its subsidiaries, is routinely a party to
pending or threatened litigation or arbitration disputes in the
normal course of its business. Based upon information presently
available, in view of legal and other defenses available to the
Companys subsidiaries, management does not believe that
any pending or threatened litigation or arbitration disputes
will have any material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition or operating results, except for the
following matters. |
|
|
Acquisition Rescission Litigation. In April 2000, the
Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia for damages and, alternatively, to
rescind the stock purchase of a Michigan insurance agency and
two related insurance companies specializing in insurance
program business based upon the sellers breach of the
representations and warranties made in the definitive agreements
concerning the business affairs and financial condition of the
acquired companies. This case and related litigation were
settled in December 2005 with the release of 109,716 shares
of escrowed stock and cash of $355,000 payable to the various
defendants. |
F-31
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
Assumed Reinsurance Litigation. The Company is a
defendant in several cases, liquidation actions and reinsurance
claims, collectively identified as the National
Warranty issue. American Safety Reinsurance was an excess
of loss reinsurer through a reinsurance treaty with National
Warranty Risk Retention Group (National Warranty)
that, in turn, provided insurance coverage to automobile
dealerships and other providers that became obligors pursuant to
extended automobile warranty contracts they sold to consumers.
National Warranty filed for liquidation in the Cayman Islands
(the location of its legal creation). This liquidation had a
cascading effect, including the subsequent filing of bankruptcy
by various obligors of vehicle service contracts insured by
National Warranty. As a result, there are potentially over one
million vehicle service contracts that are not being honored by
the obligors. |
|
|
The liquidators of National Warranty have made claims in excess
of $24 million pursuant to two reinsurance contracts issued
by American Safety Reinsurance to National Warranty. In
addition, purchasers of vehicle service contracts have made
claims against American Safety Reinsurance, including a claim by
one purchaser group for $10 million. Lastly, claims have
been made by sellers/obligors of the vehicle service contracts
who were insured by National Warranty. One case has been
certified as a class action, although the Company is appealing
that determination. The Company continues to believe that
American Safety Reinsurance has valid defenses to the claims
including, among others, that it had commuted its obligations
under reinsurance treaties, its liability is limited to the
amount of coverage provided under the policies and that most of
the claimants cannot make claims directly against it. |
|
|
Donald Griggs et al. v. American Safety
Reinsurance, Ltd. Et al., Case No 2003-31509, Circuit Court,
Seventh District, Volusia County, Florida. Seven plaintiffs
filed suit against the Company and three of its subsidiaries
seeking to recover a $2,100,000 loan made by the plaintiffs in
1986 to Ponce Marina, Inc., the former owner of the Harbour
Village property. The plaintiffs claimed that the Company was
responsible for the repayment of the loan, with interest. The
plaintiffs propounded four theories of liability and the court
granted judgment for the Company on three of the theories.
However, the court entered judgment on August 10, 2005
against the Company for $3,426,703, which includes interest, on
the remaining theory. The court held that the Company, as a
condition of its loan, required the former owner to demand that
the plaintiffs take certain actions as to their loan, to their
detriment and to the benefit of the Company, and thus, the
Company had entered into a quasi-contract with the plaintiffs to
repay their loan with interest. |
|
|
The Company filed an appeal in December 2005. Based on the
merits of the case and the likelihood of ultimate payment, the
Company has not established an accrual for the decision. |
|
|
Dick Sizemore v. American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. Et al., Case No 2005-31704, Circuit Court of Volusia
County, Florida. ASI Services, its parents and a number of its
affiliates are defendants in a suit brought by an individual who
contends that defendants are liable to him for a debt owed to
him by ASI Services former borrowers, Ponce Marina, Inc.
and Herman McMurray, in the amount of $400,000 plus interest and
costs. The plaintiff also intends to seek class certification
for the case on these claims. On January 27, 2006, the
trial court dismissed the case. The plaintiff was permitted to
file an amended complaint on or before March 6, 2006. The
plaintiff filed an amended complaint on March 7, 2006,
alleging various theories of recovery. The Company continues to
vigorously defend this case, as it believes that the case is
without merit. |
|
|
Baber v. Boroweic v. American Safety Casualty
Insurance Company This case arises out of a claim brought by
the Baber family against two lawyers (the Boroweics)
for legal malpractice who were insured by American Safety
Casualty Insurance Company (American Safety
Casualty) under a lawyers professional liability
program underwritten and managed through American Safety
Casualtys program manager Professional Coverage Managers,
Inc. During the adjustment of this |
F-32
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
claim, American Safety Casualty issued a reservation of rights
letter, denied the claim based on a coverage issue, rejected a
policy limits demand and intervened into the underlying suit. |
|
|
The Babers and Boroweics eventually entered into a Morris
Agreement wherein the Babers agreed not to pursue any
judgment against the Boroweics. Rather, the Boroweics assigned
their bad faith rights against American Safety Casualty to the
Babers. The court found this to be reasonable and also found
that the Babers, as a result of the accident, had incurred
$11 million in damages. The Babers sued American Safety
Casualty for bad faith. This case was settled out of court in
December 2005 for $5.5 million. |
|
|
American Safety Casualty is billing reinsurers under a 90/10
Quota Share treaty with a $2.0 million ECO/ XPL limit and
also has a Clash Cover treaty with a $5.0 million limit,
and anticipates $1.3 million of the loss to be its ultimate
exposure, which was recorded in 2005. |
F-33
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the quarterly results of
consolidated operations for 2004 and 2005 (dollars in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Mar. 31 | |
|
June 30 | |
|
Sept. 30 | |
|
Dec. 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating revenues*
|
|
$ |
50,173 |
|
|
$ |
54,629 |
|
|
$ |
57,096 |
|
|
$ |
52,758 |
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
4,652 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
4,097 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
3,753 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
5,933 |
|
|
|
(1,439 |
) |
|
|
6,639 |
|
|
|
3,982 |
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
Common stock price ranges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
|
$ |
15.21 |
|
|
$ |
16.45 |
|
|
Low
|
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
13.50 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Mar. 31 | |
|
June 30 | |
|
Sept. 30 | |
|
Dec. 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating revenues*
|
|
$ |
40,088 |
|
|
$ |
38,687 |
|
|
$ |
34,911 |
|
|
$ |
42,243 |
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
3,347 |
|
|
|
4,524 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
7,002 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Common stock price ranges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$ |
16.24 |
|
|
$ |
15.75 |
|
|
$ |
17.98 |
|
|
$ |
17.98 |
|
|
Low
|
|
|
14.27 |
|
|
|
14.20 |
|
|
|
15.17 |
|
|
|
16.10 |
|
|
|
* |
Operating revenues are total revenues less realized gains and
losses. |
F-34
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
ASSETS |
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
$ |
364,856,826 |
|
|
$ |
370,540,951 |
|
|
Common stock, at fair value
|
|
|
21,706,103 |
|
|
|
24,513,436 |
|
|
Preferred stock, at fair value
|
|
|
3,607,000 |
|
|
|
5,050,200 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
25,326,648 |
|
|
|
21,439,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
415,496,577 |
|
|
|
421,543,709 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23,289,927 |
|
|
|
24,800,308 |
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
4,037,573 |
|
|
|
3,707,622 |
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
17,315,778 |
|
|
|
21,115,489 |
|
Ceded unearned premium
|
|
|
29,880,672 |
|
|
|
27,946,517 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
173,490,056 |
|
|
|
174,484,812 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11,933,791 |
|
|
|
12,751,580 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
10,628,874 |
|
|
|
10,505,500 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,489,608 |
|
|
|
4,590,880 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,572,007 |
|
|
|
8,128,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
697,134,863 |
|
|
$ |
709,574,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$ |
394,872,581 |
|
|
$ |
403,197,196 |
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
100,241,061 |
|
|
|
96,827,843 |
|
|
Ceded premiums payable
|
|
|
16,505,732 |
|
|
|
21,373,500 |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,066,758 |
|
|
|
10,873,834 |
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
37,810,099 |
|
|
|
37,793,777 |
|
|
Funds held
|
|
|
11,190,989 |
|
|
|
15,418,879 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
5,012,396 |
|
|
|
4,382,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
578,699,616 |
|
|
|
589,867,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized
5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized
15,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2005, 6,753,731 and March 31, 2006,
6,779,031 shares
|
|
|
67,537 |
|
|
|
67,790 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
49,460,019 |
|
|
|
49,787,701 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
70,457,352 |
|
|
|
74,558,351 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net
|
|
|
(1,549,661 |
) |
|
|
(4,706,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
118,435,247 |
|
|
|
119,707,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
697,134,863 |
|
|
$ |
709,574,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited).
F-35
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct premiums earned
|
|
$ |
55,245,400 |
|
|
$ |
56,595,812 |
|
|
Assumed premiums earned
|
|
|
6,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded premiums earned
|
|
|
(20,631,451 |
) |
|
|
(21,538,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
34,620,611 |
|
|
|
35,057,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
3,156,381 |
|
|
|
4,543,643 |
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
52,232 |
|
|
|
362,984 |
|
|
Real estate income
|
|
|
2,309,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
64,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
40,140,173 |
|
|
|
40,028,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
20,781,044 |
|
|
|
22,155,055 |
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
7,126,379 |
|
|
|
6,977,322 |
|
|
Payroll and related expenses
|
|
|
2,966,986 |
|
|
|
3,542,467 |
|
|
Real estate expenses
|
|
|
2,264,529 |
|
|
|
67,040 |
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,238,640 |
|
|
|
2,738,489 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
266,679 |
|
|
|
903,046 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
587,898 |
|
|
|
(472,456 |
) |
|
Expense due to rescission
|
|
|
10,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
36,243,023 |
|
|
|
35,910,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
3,897,150 |
|
|
|
4,117,199 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
250,807 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
3,646,343 |
|
|
$ |
4,100,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
6,791,476 |
|
|
|
6,762,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
7,265,523 |
|
|
|
7,164,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited).
F-36
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
3,646,343 |
|
|
$ |
4,100,999 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains on investments
|
|
|
(52,232 |
) |
|
|
(362,984 |
) |
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
218,597 |
|
|
|
379,550 |
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,556 |
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, net
|
|
|
392,121 |
|
|
|
123,374 |
|
|
|
Amortization of premiums on investments
|
|
|
611,941 |
|
|
|
465,986 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(324,115 |
) |
|
|
139,362 |
|
|
|
Change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment and interest income
|
|
|
232,239 |
|
|
|
329,951 |
|
|
|
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
(5,440,565 |
) |
|
|
(3,799,711 |
) |
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable, payable and ceded unearned premiums
|
|
|
(12,886,486 |
) |
|
|
939,399 |
|
|
|
|
Funds held
|
|
|
(402,513 |
) |
|
|
4,227,890 |
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
15,218,983 |
|
|
|
8,324,615 |
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
8,958,786 |
|
|
|
(3,413,218 |
) |
|
|
|
Ceded premiums payable
|
|
|
5,134,676 |
|
|
|
4,867,768 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(535,618 |
) |
|
|
(2,192,924 |
) |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3,071,437 |
|
|
|
(1,972,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
17,843,594 |
|
|
|
12,298,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturities
|
|
|
(42,342,488 |
) |
|
|
(34,467,012 |
) |
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(4,835,288 |
) |
|
|
(3,704,770 |
) |
|
Purchases of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,490,750 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed maturities
|
|
|
10,311,929 |
|
|
|
23,556,591 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
802,383 |
|
|
|
1,723,822 |
|
|
Decrease in short-term investments
|
|
|
17,664,266 |
|
|
|
3,887,526 |
|
|
Decrease in real estate investment
|
|
|
1,514,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets, net
|
|
|
(268,867 |
) |
|
|
(480,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(17,153,413 |
) |
|
|
(10,975,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
134,867 |
|
|
|
187,379 |
|
|
Repayment of loan payable
|
|
|
(382,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(248,006 |
) |
|
|
187,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
442,175 |
|
|
|
1,510,381 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
24,843,736 |
|
|
|
23,289,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
25,285,911 |
|
|
$ |
24,800,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$ |
264,810 |
|
|
$ |
1,540,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
248,067 |
|
|
$ |
951,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited).
F-37
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
3,646,343 |
|
|
$ |
4,100,999 |
|
Other comprehensive earnings before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of
minority interest of $(212,671) and $(239,276) for 2005 and
2006, respectively
|
|
|
(4,660,086 |
) |
|
|
(3,742,196 |
) |
Unrealized gains on hedging transaction
|
|
|
280,785 |
|
|
|
72,697 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net
earnings
|
|
|
(52,232 |
) |
|
|
(362,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss before taxes
|
|
|
(4,431,533 |
) |
|
|
(4,032,483 |
) |
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive
income, net of minority interest of $(1,363) and $(81,352) for
March 31, 2005 and 2006 respectively
|
|
|
(931,758 |
) |
|
|
(875,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss net of income taxes
|
|
|
(3,499,775 |
) |
|
|
(3,156,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive earnings
|
|
$ |
146,568 |
|
|
$ |
944,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited).
F-38
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of American
Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (American Safety)
and its subsidiaries and American Safety Risk Retention Group,
Inc. (American Safety RRG), a non-subsidiary risk
retention group affiliate (collectively, the
Company) are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates,
based on the best information available, in recording
transactions resulting from business operations. The balance
sheet amounts that involve a greater extent of accounting
estimates and/or actuarial determinations subject to future
changes are the Companys invested assets, deferred income
taxes, and the liabilities for unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses. As additional information becomes available (or actual
amounts are determinable), the recorded estimates may be revised
and reflected in operating results. While management believes
that these estimates are adequate, such estimates may change in
the future.
The results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 may not be indicative of the results that
may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2006. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes included in the audited consolidated
financial statements on
Form 10-K of the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of American Safety, each of its subsidiaries and
American Safety RRG. All significant intercompany balances have
been eliminated. In 2005, the Company changed its segment
presentation. See Note 5 for additional information. Prior
years have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation.
Note 2 Accounting Pronouncements
During the last two years, the Financial Accounting Standard
Board (FASB) has issued a number of accounting
pronouncements with various effective dates.
In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position Number
FAS 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
and Its Application to Certain Investments (FSP
115-1). FSP 115-1 addresses the determination as to when
an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is
other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss.
It also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the
recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires
certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been
recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The guidance in
FSP 115-1 amends FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and was
effective January 1, 2006. The adoption of this
pronouncement did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial statement.
In April 2006, the FASB issued a Staff Position Number
FIN 46(R)-6, Determining the Variability to be Considered
in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FSP
46R-6). FSP 46R-6 responds to the need for guidance on the
relevant risks and rewards that must be identified and evaluated
in order to apply FIN 46R, and is effective for fiscal
periods beginning after June 15, 2006. This pronouncement
will have no impact on the Company as it already consolidates
its non-subsidiary affiliate American Safety RRG.
F-39
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 3 Nature of Operations
The following is a description of certain risks facing the
Company:
|
|
|
Legal/ Regulatory Risk is the risk that changes in the
legal or regulatory environment in which an insurer operates
will create additional expenses not anticipated by the Company
in pricing its products and beyond those recorded in the
financial statements. That is, regulatory initiatives designed
to reduce insurer profits or otherwise affecting the industry in
which the insurer operates, new legal theories or insurance
company insolvencies through guaranty fund assessments may
create costs for the insurer beyond those recorded in the
financial statements. The Company attempts to mitigate this risk
by writing insurance business in several states, thereby
spreading this risk over a large geographic area. |
|
|
The Potential Risk of United States Taxation of Bermuda
Operations. Under current Bermuda law, American Safety is
not required to pay any taxes in Bermuda on either income or
capital gains. American Safety has received an undertaking from
the Minister of Finance in Bermuda that will exempt American
Safety from taxation until the year 2016 in the event of any
such taxes being imposed. Whether a foreign corporation is
engaged in a United States trade or business or is carrying on
an insurance business in the United States that would subject it
to United States taxation depends upon the level of activities
conducted in the United States. If the activities of a foreign
company are continuous, regular, and considerable,
the foreign company will be deemed to be engaged in a United
States trade or business. Management believes that American
Safety and its Bermuda subsidiaries have been operated and in
the future will continue to be operated in a manner that will
not cause any of them to be treated as being engaged in a
U.S. trade or business. |
|
|
However, because the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
Treasury Regulations and court decisions do not definitively
identify activities that constitute being engaged in a United
States trade or business, and because of the factual nature of
the determination, there can be no assurance that the Internal
Revenue Service will not contend that American Safety and/or its
Bermuda subsidiaries are engaged in a United States trade or
business. In general, if American Safety or its Bermuda
subsidiaries were engaged in a United States trade or business,
each could be subject to (i) United States Federal income
tax on income effectively connected with that trade or business
and (ii) United States branch profits tax. Certain
subsidiaries of American Safety are, however, subject to United
States federal and state income tax as they are domiciled and
conduct business in the United States. |
|
|
Credit Risk is the risk that issuers of securities owned
by the insurer or secured notes receivable will default or that
other parties, including reinsurers that have obligations to the
insurer, will not pay or perform. The Company attempts to
mitigate this risk by adhering to a conservative investment
strategy, by obtaining sufficient collateral for secured note
obligations and by maintaining sound reinsurance, credit and
collection policies. |
|
|
Interest Rate Risk is the risk that interest rates may
change and cause a decrease in the value of an insurers
investments. |
|
|
The Companys fixed maturity holdings are invested
predominantly in high quality corporate, government and
municipal bonds with relatively short durations. The fixed
maturity portfolio is exposed to interest rate fluctuations; as
interest rates rise, their fair values decline and as interest
rates fall, their fair values rise. The changes in the fair
market value of the fixed maturity portfolio are presented as a
component of shareholders equity in accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of taxes. |
F-40
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
We work to manage the impact of interest rate fluctuations on
our fixed maturity portfolio. The effective duration of the
fixed maturity portfolio is managed with consideration given to
the estimated payout timing of our liabilities. We have
investment policies which limit the maximum duration and
maturity of individual securities within the portfolio and set
target levels for average duration and maturity of the entire
portfolio. |
Note 4 Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of the
Companys investments at December 31, 2005 and
March 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies
|
|
$ |
86,740,033 |
|
|
$ |
547,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,311,628 |
|
|
$ |
85,976,073 |
|
|
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
64,740,408 |
|
|
|
386,303 |
|
|
|
498,465 |
|
|
|
64,628,246 |
|
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
84,763,525 |
|
|
|
618,765 |
|
|
|
1,598,413 |
|
|
|
83,783,877 |
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
132,992,335 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
|
|
2,579,971 |
|
|
|
130,468,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
369,283,174 |
|
|
|
1,609,002 |
|
|
|
5,988,477 |
|
|
|
364,856,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
$ |
19,983,174 |
|
|
$ |
2,721,304 |
|
|
$ |
998,374 |
|
|
$ |
21,706,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
$ |
3,500,900 |
|
|
$ |
106,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,607,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies
|
|
$ |
84,432,281 |
|
|
$ |
204,267 |
|
|
$ |
2,086,039 |
|
|
$ |
82,550,509 |
|
|
|
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
66,966,030 |
|
|
|
80,675 |
|
|
|
1,331,072 |
|
|
|
65,715,633 |
|
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
83,214,382 |
|
|
|
288,511 |
|
|
|
2,161,799 |
|
|
|
81,341,094 |
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
145,216,025 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
4,282,784 |
|
|
|
140,933,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
379,828,718 |
|
|
$ |
573,927 |
|
|
$ |
9,861,694 |
|
|
$ |
370,540,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
22,179,120 |
|
|
$ |
3,282,358 |
|
|
$ |
948,042 |
|
|
$ |
24,513,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$ |
4,991,650 |
|
|
$ |
74,450 |
|
|
$ |
15,900 |
|
|
$ |
5,050,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Segment Information
The Company initially segregates its business into the following
segments: Real Estate Operations, Insurance Operations, and
Other. The Insurance Operations segment is further classified
into three
F-41
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
additional lines: Excess and Surplus Lines (E&S),
Alternative Risk Transfer (ART), and Runoff lines. The E&S
lines is then further classified into three reportable lines of
business: Environmental Specialty (Env.), Construction (Const.),
and Surety. ART is then further classified into two reportable
lines of business: Specialty Programs (Programs) and
Fully-Funded (FF).
Real estate consists of the Harbour Village project in Ponce
Inlet, Florida.
In our E&S line, Environmental Specialty writes insurance
coverages for the environmental remediation industry.
Construction provides commercial casualty insurance coverages,
generally in the area of construction and products liability.
Surety provides payment and performance bonds to the
environmental remediation industry.
In our ART line, Specialty Programs facilitates the offering of
insurance to homogeneous niche groups of risks. Fully-funded
provides a mechanism for insureds to post collateral and
self-insure their risks. The Company is paid a fee for arranging
this type of transaction.
The Other segment consists of amounts associated with realized
gains and losses on investments.
The Company measures all segments using net earnings, total
assets and total equity. The Reportable Insurance Operations
segments are measured by net premiums earned, incurred losses
and loss adjustment expenses and acquisition expenses. Assets
are not allocated to the Reportable Insurance Operations
segments. The following table presents key financial data by
segment for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S | |
|
ART | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
Estate | |
|
Env. | |
|
Const. | |
|
Surety | |
|
Specialty Programs | |
|
FF | |
|
Runoff | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross premiums written
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$13,594 |
|
|
$ |
27,053 |
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
22,743 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,211 |
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
|
22,185 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,770 |
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
21,104 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,621 |
|
Losses & loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
12,888 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,781 |
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,126 |
|
Underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ 1,543 |
|
|
$ |
3,670 |
|
|
$ |
(205 |
) |
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,714 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ 222 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ 3,604 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
3,439 |
|
|
$605,940 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
609,382 |
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
$106,585 |
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
|
$ |
109,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S | |
|
ART | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Estate | |
|
Env. | |
|
Const. | |
|
Surety | |
|
Programs | |
|
FF | |
|
Runoff | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross premiums written
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,641 |
|
|
$ |
23,064 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
16,345 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53,183 |
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,071 |
|
|
|
20,353 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,320 |
|
|
|
21,035 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,057 |
|
Losses & loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,695 |
|
|
|
13,558 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,155 |
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
4,142 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,977 |
|
Underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
3,335 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,925 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ (41) |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ 3,863 |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
4,101 |
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
|
$707,107 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
709,575 |
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$119,095 |
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
119,707 |
|
F-42
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company conducts business in the following geographic
segments: United States and Bermuda. Significant differences
exist in the regulatory environment in each country, which
requires the Company to set forth operations by those geographic
segments. The table below describes the Companys
operations by geographic segment for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
United States | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
|
$ |
2,053 |
|
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
471,346 |
|
|
$ |
138,036 |
|
|
$ |
609,382 |
|
Equity
|
|
$ |
55,927 |
|
|
$ |
53,134 |
|
|
$ |
109,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
United States | |
|
Bermuda | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
|
$ |
3,055 |
|
|
$ |
4,101 |
|
Assets
|
|
$ |
537,187 |
|
|
$ |
172,388 |
|
|
$ |
709,575 |
|
Equity
|
|
$ |
58,348 |
|
|
$ |
61,359 |
|
|
$ |
119,707 |
|
Note 6 Income Taxes
Total income tax expense (benefit) for the periods ended
March 31, 2005 and 2006 was allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tax expense (benefit) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
250,807 |
|
|
$ |
16,200 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on hedging transactions
|
|
|
95,467 |
|
|
|
24,717 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale
securities
|
|
|
(1,028,588 |
) |
|
|
(981,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(682,314 |
) |
|
$ |
(940,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal and state income tax expense (benefit) from
continuing operations consists of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
574,926 |
|
|
$ |
(123,162 |
) |
Deferred
|
|
|
(324,119 |
) |
|
|
139,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
250,807 |
|
|
$ |
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The state income tax expense aggregated $42,226 and $15,168 for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2006,
respectively, and is included in the current provision.
F-43
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income tax expense from continuing operations for the periods
ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 differed from the amount
computed by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate of
34% to earnings before Federal income taxes as a result of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Expected income tax expense
|
|
$ |
1,325,031 |
|
|
$ |
1,399,848 |
|
Foreign earned income not subject to direct taxation
|
|
|
(698,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,038,762 |
) |
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(554,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
State taxes and other
|
|
|
178,583 |
|
|
|
(344,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax
|
|
$ |
250,807 |
|
|
$ |
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes are based upon temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities. The following deferred taxes are recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserve discounting
|
|
$ |
9,288,244 |
|
|
$ |
9,472,998 |
|
|
Unearned premium reserves
|
|
|
3,118,965 |
|
|
|
3,015,087 |
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
|
|
|
667,159 |
|
|
|
1,649,028 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
502,989 |
|
|
|
495,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
13,577,357 |
|
|
|
14,632,903 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
1,477,230 |
|
|
|
1,690,270 |
|
|
Unrealized gains on hedging transaction
|
|
|
166,336 |
|
|
|
191,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,643,566 |
|
|
|
1,881,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
11,933,791 |
|
|
$ |
12,751,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Employee Stock Options
The Companys stock option plan grants incentive stock
options to employees. The majority of the options outstanding
under the plan generally vest evenly over a three year period
and have a term of 10 years. The Company uses the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to value stock options.
The Company applied the recognition and measurement principles
of SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment in the first
quarter of 2006. Compensation expense of $140,556 is reflected
in net earnings for the first quarter of 2006.
F-44
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the effect on earnings and
earnings per share, assuming we had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R Accounting for
Share Based Payments for the three months ended March 31,
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ending | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, | |
|
|
except per share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
Net earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
|
Effect of stock options
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$ |
3,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
F-45
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. (PARENT ONLY)
SCHEDULE II CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
$ |
91,915,835 |
|
|
$ |
104,160,885 |
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
|
10,246,304 |
|
|
|
4,753,607 |
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
5,839,306 |
|
|
|
9,125,625 |
|
|
Short term investments
|
|
|
392,576 |
|
|
|
110,231 |
|
|
Secured note receivable from affiliate
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investments
|
|
|
18,978,186 |
|
|
|
16,489,463 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
67,040 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
84,137 |
|
|
|
48,615 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
165,497 |
|
|
|
21,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
111,210,695 |
|
|
$ |
120,722,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Due to related party
|
|
$ |
2,322,556 |
|
|
$ |
2,107,973 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
|
78,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,331,012 |
|
|
|
2,186,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
67,817 |
|
|
|
67,537 |
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
51,067,506 |
|
|
|
49,460,019 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses), net
|
|
|
1,843,418 |
|
|
|
(1,549,661 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
55,800,942 |
|
|
|
70,457,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
108,779,683 |
|
|
|
118,435,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
111,210,695 |
|
|
$ |
120,722,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying independent auditors report.
F-46
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. (PARENT ONLY)
SCHEDULE II CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004 AND 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
$ |
79,077 |
|
|
$ |
515,024 |
|
|
$ |
314,437 |
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,283 |
|
|
|
(20,140 |
) |
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
(500,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
(420,923 |
) |
|
|
522,304 |
|
|
|
294,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and LAE incurred
|
|
|
(630,077 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
853,030 |
|
|
|
1,792,178 |
|
|
|
1,398,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
222,953 |
|
|
|
1,792,178 |
|
|
|
1,398,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before equity in net earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
(643,876 |
) |
|
|
(1,269,874 |
) |
|
|
(1,103,970 |
) |
|
Equity in net earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
8,058,286 |
|
|
|
16,026,849 |
|
|
|
15,760,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
7,414,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,756,975 |
|
|
$ |
14,656,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying independent auditors report.
F-47
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. (PARENT ONLY)
SCHEDULE II STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004 AND 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before equity in earnings of subsidiary
|
|
$ |
(643,876 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,269,874 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,103,970 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
326,175 |
|
|
|
104,179 |
|
|
|
35,522 |
|
|
|
Premiums receivable/payable
|
|
|
485,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from/to affiliate
|
|
|
856,898 |
|
|
|
(752,043 |
) |
|
|
(214,583 |
) |
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(1,715,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
52,974 |
|
|
|
(176,678 |
) |
|
|
70,375 |
|
|
|
Assumed loss and LAE payable
|
|
|
(199,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(245,507 |
) |
|
|
797,694 |
|
|
|
135,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(1,083,627 |
) |
|
|
(1,296,722 |
) |
|
|
(1,076,890 |
) |
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in investments
|
|
|
(29,339,562 |
) |
|
|
7,428,345 |
|
|
|
2,456,282 |
|
|
Investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,307,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in short term investments
|
|
|
(431,372 |
) |
|
|
52,796 |
|
|
|
282,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(29,770,934 |
) |
|
|
3,173,899 |
|
|
|
2,738,627 |
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
26,876,525 |
|
|
|
638,495 |
|
|
|
1,218,455 |
|
|
Stock repurchase payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,485,209 |
) |
|
|
(2,945,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
26,876,525 |
|
|
|
(1,846,714 |
) |
|
|
(1,727,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
|
|
|
(3,978,036 |
) |
|
|
30,463 |
|
|
|
(65,522 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
4,014,613 |
|
|
|
36,577 |
|
|
|
67,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
36,577 |
|
|
$ |
67,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying independent auditors Report.
F-48
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD. (PARENT ONLY)
SCHEDULE II CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004 AND 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
7,414,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,756,975 |
|
|
$ |
14,656,410 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for sale, net
of minority interest of $(141,761) $(108,334) and $(259,129) for
2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
1,154,202 |
|
|
|
463,260 |
|
|
|
(4,541,890 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on hedging transactions
|
|
|
(95,953 |
) |
|
|
81,912 |
|
|
|
311,359 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses
included in net earnings, net of minority interest of $(51,324)
($86,986) and $0 for 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
(3,088,583 |
) |
|
|
(121,149 |
) |
|
|
54,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,030,334 |
) |
|
|
424,023 |
|
|
|
(4,176,430 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income, net of minority interest of $0 for 2003
and 2004 and $(5,534) for 2005 respectively
|
|
|
(630,673 |
) |
|
|
65,933 |
|
|
|
(783,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,399,661 |
) |
|
|
358,090 |
|
|
|
(3,393,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
6,014,749 |
|
|
$ |
15,115,065 |
|
|
$ |
11,263,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying independent auditors report.
F-49
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
SCHEDULE III SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
CONCERNING
PROPERTY-CASUALTY INSURANCE OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column B | |
|
Column C | |
|
Column D | |
|
Column E | |
|
Column F | |
|
Column G | |
|
Column H | |
|
Column I | |
|
Column J | |
|
Column K | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves for | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
Claims and | |
|
Discount, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to | |
|
Amortization of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy | |
|
Claim | |
|
if any, | |
|
Net | |
|
Net | |
|
Net | |
|
| |
|
Deferred Policy | |
|
Other | |
|
Net | |
|
|
Acquisition | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
Deducted in | |
|
Unearned | |
|
Earned | |
|
Investment | |
|
Current | |
|
Prior | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Operating | |
|
Premiums | |
|
|
Costs | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Column C | |
|
Premiums | |
|
Premiums | |
|
Income(1) | |
|
Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Costs | |
|
Expenses(1) | |
|
Written | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
3,318 |
|
|
$ |
20,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,528 |
|
|
$ |
22,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,818 |
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
6,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,233 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
60,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,280 |
|
|
|
57,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,838 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
12,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,572 |
|
Surety
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
81,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,967 |
|
|
|
80,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,812 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
19,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,539 |
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
13,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,009 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
|
Fully Funded
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
13,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,257 |
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,009 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,152 |
|
Runoff
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
20,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,605 |
|
|
|
14,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,777 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
11,960 |
|
|
$ |
115,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,829 |
|
|
$ |
109,334 |
|
|
$ |
5,801 |
|
|
$ |
60,598 |
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
21,818 |
|
|
$ |
23,684 |
|
|
$ |
131,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
4,107 |
|
|
$ |
32,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,384 |
|
|
$ |
32,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
5,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,024 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
7,337 |
|
|
|
107,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,393 |
|
|
|
79,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,431 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
19,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,894 |
|
Surety
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
140,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,972 |
|
|
|
113,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,871 |
|
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
|
25,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,092 |
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
18,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,993 |
|
|
|
16,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,433 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(2,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
Fully Funded
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
18,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,161 |
|
|
|
16,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,433 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
(3,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,530 |
|
Runoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,797 |
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
|
$ |
184,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,344 |
|
|
$ |
136,391 |
|
|
$ |
9,773 |
|
|
$ |
79,101 |
|
|
$ |
14,402 |
|
|
$ |
26,529 |
|
|
$ |
19,932 |
|
|
$ |
131,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E&S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
$ |
4,569 |
|
|
$ |
45,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,779 |
|
|
$ |
38,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,007 |
|
|
$ |
(754 |
) |
|
$ |
9,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,477 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
6,457 |
|
|
|
142,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,510 |
|
|
|
81,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,721 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
17,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,026 |
|
Surety
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
|
188,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,680 |
|
|
|
121,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,828 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
27,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,848 |
|
ART
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
21,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,432 |
|
|
|
18,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,375 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,712 |
|
|
Fully Funded
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
21,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,680 |
|
|
|
19,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,564 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,749 |
|
Runoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,629 |
|
|
$ |
233,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
70,360 |
|
|
$ |
138,536 |
|
|
$ |
14,316 |
|
|
$ |
81,800 |
|
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
$ |
28,512 |
|
|
$ |
23,970 |
|
|
$ |
140,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company does not allocate net investment income or other
operating expenses to the various business segments. See
accompanying independent auditors report. |
F-50
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
SCHEDULE IV REINSURANCE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004 AND 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed | |
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Ceded to | |
|
from | |
|
|
|
Amount | |
Property-Liability Insurance |
|
Gross | |
|
Other | |
|
Other | |
|
Net | |
|
Assumed to | |
Premiums Earned |
|
Amount | |
|
Companies | |
|
Companies | |
|
Amount | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
175,916 |
|
|
$ |
75,268 |
|
|
$ |
8,486 |
|
|
$ |
109,134 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
223,715 |
|
|
$ |
91,324 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
136,391 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
231,518 |
|
|
$ |
92,901 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
138,536 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Bermuda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
175,916 |
|
|
$ |
75,068 |
|
|
$ |
8,486 |
|
|
$ |
109,334 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
223,715 |
|
|
$ |
91,324 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
136,391 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
231,518 |
|
|
$ |
92,901 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
138,536 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
See accompanying independent auditors report.
F-51
3,200,000 Shares
AMERICAN SAFETY INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
Common Shares
PROSPECTUS
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods
a
division of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 13. |
OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION |
The estimated expenses to be paid in connection with the
issuance and distribution of the securities being registered,
other than underwriting discounts and commissions, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Registration Statement filing fees
|
|
$ |
10,630 |
|
NASD fees
|
|
|
10,434 |
|
Listing fees
|
|
|
19,266 |
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
215,000 |
|
Printing and preparation of Registration Statement, Prospectus,
etc.
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Blue Sky fees and expenses
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
59,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. |
|
|
|
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. |
American Safety Insurance is incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda. Section 98 of the Companies Act, 1981 of Bermuda
(the Companies Act) provides generally that a
Bermuda company may indemnify its directors, officers and
auditors against any liability which by virtue of Bermuda law
otherwise would be imposed on them, except in cases where that
liability arises from the fraud or dishonesty of which that
director, officer or auditor may be guilty in relation to
American Safety Insurance. Section 98 further provides that
a Bermudian company may indemnify its directors, officers and
auditors against liability incurred by them in defending any
proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is
awarded in their favor or they are acquitted or in which they
are acquitted or granted relief by the Supreme Court of Bermuda
in certain proceedings arising under Section 281 of the
Companies Act.
American Safety Insurance has adopted provisions in its Bye-Laws
that provide that American Safety Insurance will indemnify its
directors and officers, and their heirs, executors and
administrators, against all actions, costs, charges, losses,
damages and expenses which they incur by or by reason of any act
done, concurred in or omitted in the execution of their duties,
or supposed duties, or for any loss, misfortune or damage which
may happen in the execution of those duties, provided that this
indemnity will not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud
or dishonesty which may attach to any of those individuals.
American Safety Insurance has also adopted provisions in its
Bye-Laws that provide that each shareholder of American Safety
Insurance and American Safety Insurance itself agrees to waive
any claim or right of action he or it might have, whether
individually or by or in the right of American Safety Insurance,
against any director or officer on account of any action taken
by that director or officer, or the failure of that director or
officer to take any action, in the performance of his duties, or
supposed duties, with or for American Safety Insurance, provided
that this waiver will not extend to any matter in respect of any
fraud or dishonesty which may attach to that director or officer.
The underwriting agreement provides for reciprocal
indemnification between American Safety Insurance and the
underwriters against certain liabilities in connection with the
offering, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Reference is made to the form underwriting agreement filed
herewith as Exhibit 1.1.
American Safety Insurance has in force and effect an insurance
policy insuring our directors and officers against losses which
they or any of them will become legally obligated to pay by
reason of any actual or alleged error or misstatement or
misleading statement or act or omission or neglect or breach of
II-1
duty by the directors and officers in the discharge of their
duties, individually or collectively, or any matter claimed
against them solely by reason of their being directors or
officers. This coverage is limited by the specific terms and
provisions of the insurance policies.
|
|
ITEM 15. |
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES |
On May 22, 2003, American Safety Capital Trust issued
$8,000,000 of its Floating Rate InCapS Trust Preferred
Securities to InCapS Funding I, Ltd. and 248,000 of its
common securities to American Safety Holdings Corp., and in
connection therewith, American Safety Holdings Corp., issued
$8,248,000 aggregate principal amount of its Floating Rate
Junior Subordinated Notes due 2033 to the Trust. Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P. acted as placement agent.
This transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to
Regulation D and Section 4(2) under the Securities Act.
On September 30, 2003, American Safety Capital
Trust II issued $5,000,000 of its Floating Rate
Trust Preferred Securities to DeKania CDO I, Ltd. and
160,000 of its common securities to American Safety Holdings,
Corp., and in connection therewith, American Safety Holdings
Corp issued $5,160,000 aggregate principal amount of its Junior
Subordinated Notes due 2033 to the Trust. This transaction was
exempt pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act.
On November 18, 2005, American Safety Capital
Trust III issued $25,000,000 of its Fixed/ Floating Rate
Trust Preferred Securities to Keefe, Bruyette &
Woods, Inc. and 774,000 of its common securities to American
Safety Holdings Corp., and in connection therewith, American
Safety Holdings Corp. issued $25,774,000 aggregate principal
amount of its Junior Subordinated Notes due 2035 to the Trust.
This transaction was exempt from registration pursuant to
Regulation D and Section 4(2) under the Securities Act.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this registration
statement:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
*1 |
.1 |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Memorandum of Association of American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration
No. 333-42749) as filed with the SEC on January 27,
1998) and the Certificate of Incorporation of Change of Name
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-109799) as
filed with the SEC on October 17, 2003) |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Bye-Laws of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration
No. 333-42749) as filed with the SEC on January 27,
1998) |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Common Share Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-42749) as filed with the
SEC on January 27, 1998) |
|
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of American Safety
Capital Trust dated as of May 22, 2003 among Wilmington
Trust Company, as institutional trustee and Delaware trustee,
American Safety Holdings Corp., as sponsor, American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (formerly known as American Safety
Insurance Group, Ltd.), as guarantor, Steven B. Mathis, Stephen
R. Crim and Fred J. Pinckney, as administrators (incorporated by
reference to the Exhibits to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed May 22, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Indenture dated as of May 22, 2003 between American Safety
Holdings Corp., American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(formerly known as American Safety Insurance Group, Ltd.), as
guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 22, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of May 22, 2003, between
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (formerly known as
American Safety Insurance Group, Ltd.), as guarantor, and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference
to the Exhibits to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed May 22, 2003 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of American Safety Capital
Trust II dated as of September 30, 2003 among American
Safety Holdings Corp. as depositor, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
property trustee, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National
Association, as Delaware trustee, and Steven B. Mathis, Stephen
R. Crim and Fred J. Pinckney, as administrative trustees
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of September 30,
2003 between American Safety Holdings Corp. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as trustee (incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2003
(File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of September 30, 2003 among
American Safety Holdings Corp., as guarantor, American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd., as parent guarantor and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as guarantee trustee (incorporated by reference to the
Exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
October 15, 2003 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.8 |
|
Common Securities Subscription Agreement dated as of
September 30, 2003 between American Safety Holdings Corp.
and American Safety Capital Trust II, together as offerors
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.9 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of American Safety
Capital Trust III dated as of November 17, 2005 among
American Safety Holdings Corp., as sponsor, Wilmington Trust
Company, as institutional trustee and Delaware trustee, and
Steven B. Mathis and Stephen R. Crim, as administrators
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Indenture dated as of November 17, 2005 between American
Safety Holdings Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.11 |
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of November 17, 2005 between
American Safety Holdings Corp., as guarantor, and Wilmington
Trust Company, as guarantee trustee (incorporated by reference
to the Exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 16, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.12 |
|
Parent Guarantee Agreement dated as of November 17, 2005
between American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Wilmington
Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the
Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005
(File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Subscription Agreement dated as of November 17, 2005 among
American Safety Capital Trust III, American Safety Holdings
Corp. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report on
Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
*5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Appleby Spurling Hunter |
|
|
*8 |
.1 |
|
Tax Opinion of Troutman Sanders LLP |
|
|
10 |
.1+ |
|
Employment Agreement between American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. and Stephen R. Crim (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 21,
2005. (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.2+ |
|
Employment Agreement between American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. and Joseph D. Scollo (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 21,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.2a+ |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between American
Safety Insurance Services, Inc. and Joseph D. Scollo
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to American
Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.3+ |
|
Employment Agreement between American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. and William C. Tepe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 15, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.4+ |
|
Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd.(Registration No. 333-42749) as filed with
the SEC on January 27, 1998) |
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.5+ |
|
First Amendment to the Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.49(b) to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-100065) as filed with the
SEC on September 25, 2002) |
|
|
10 |
.6+ |
|
1998 Director Stock Award Plan (as amended through
June 23, 2005) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Lease Agreement between 1845 Tenants-In-Common (formerly known
as Windy Hill Exchange, L.L.C.) and American Safety Insurance
Services, Inc. (formerly known as Environmental Management
Services, Inc.) for office space in Atlanta, Georgia
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-42749) as
filed with the SEC on December 19, 1997) |
|
|
10 |
.7(a) |
|
First Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated July 1,
1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(a) to the
Form 10-K of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7(b) |
|
Second Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated
March 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4(b) to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7(c) |
|
Third Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated
March 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4(c) to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7(d) |
|
Fourth Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated
August 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4(d) to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amended and Restated Program Management Agreement dated as of
May 31, 2002 among American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc., American Safety Casualty Insurance Company, American
Safety Indemnity Company and American Safety Risk Retention
Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to
Registrants Registration Statement filed
September 25, 2002 on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-100065)) |
|
|
12 |
.1 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 12 to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Letter from KPMG LLP regarding change in Certifying Accountant
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibit to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed August 2, 2004 (File
No. 001-4795)) |
|
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the
Form 10-K for American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
*23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Appleby Spurling Hunter (included in Exhibit 5.1) |
|
|
*23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Troutman Sanders LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1) |
|
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP |
|
|
*24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney |
|
*99 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Steven L. Groot |
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
II-4
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
|
|
|
(a) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. |
|
|
(b) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(c) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on the 20th day of June, 2006
|
|
|
American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen R. Crim |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Stephen R. Crim
Stephen R. Crim |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
and Director |
|
June 20, 2006 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ William C. Tepe
William C. Tepe |
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) |
|
June 20, 2006 |
|
By: |
|
*
Cody W. Birdwell |
|
Chairman of the Board, Director |
|
* |
|
By: |
|
*
David V. Brueggen |
|
Director |
|
* |
|
By: |
|
*
Lawrence I. Geneen |
|
Director |
|
* |
|
By: |
|
Steven
L. Groot |
|
Director |
|
|
|
By: |
|
*
Frank D. Lackner |
|
Director |
|
* |
|
By: |
|
*
William O. Mauldin, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
* |
|
By: |
|
*
Thomas W. Mueller |
|
Director |
|
* |
|
By: |
|
*
William A. Robbie |
|
Director |
|
* |
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
*
Jerome D. Weaver |
|
Director |
|
* |
|
*By: |
|
/s/ Stephen R. Crim
Stephen R. Crim
Attorney-in-Fact |
|
|
|
June 20, 2006 |
II-7
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
*1 |
.1 |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Memorandum of Association of American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration
No. 333-42749) as filed with the SEC on January 27,
1998) and the Certificate of Incorporation of Change of Name
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-109799) as
filed with the SEC on October 17, 2003) |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Bye-Laws of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration
No. 333-42749) as filed with the SEC on January 27,
1998) |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Common Share Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-42749) as filed with the
SEC on January 27, 1998) |
|
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of American Safety
Capital Trust dated as of May 22, 2003 among Wilmington
Trust Company, as institutional trustee and Delaware trustee,
American Safety Holdings Corp., as sponsor, American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (formerly known as American Safety
Insurance Group, Ltd.), as guarantor, Steven B. Mathis, Stephen
R. Crim and Fred J. Pinckney, as administrators (incorporated by
reference to the Exhibits to the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed May 22, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Indenture dated as of May 22, 2003 between American Safety
Holdings Corp., American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(formerly known as American Safety Insurance Group, Ltd.), as
guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 22, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of May 22, 2003, between
American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (formerly known as
American Safety Insurance Group, Ltd.), as guarantor, and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee (incorporated by reference
to the Exhibits to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed May 22, 2003 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of American Safety Capital
Trust II dated as of September 30, 2003 among American
Safety Holdings Corp. as depositor, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
property trustee, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National
Association, as Delaware trustee, and Steven B. Mathis, Stephen
R. Crim and Fred J. Pinckney, as administrative trustees
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of September 30,
2003 between American Safety Holdings Corp. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as trustee (incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2003
(File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of September 30, 2003 among
American Safety Holdings Corp., as guarantor, American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd., as parent guarantor and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as guarantee trustee (incorporated by reference to the
Exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
October 15, 2003 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.8 |
|
Common Securities Subscription Agreement dated as of
September 30, 2003 between American Safety Holdings Corp.
and American Safety Capital Trust II, together as offerors
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2003 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
II-8
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.9 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of American Safety
Capital Trust III dated as of November 17, 2005 among
American Safety Holdings Corp., as sponsor, Wilmington Trust
Company, as institutional trustee and Delaware trustee, and
Steven B. Mathis and Stephen R. Crim, as administrators
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Indenture dated as of November 17, 2005 between American
Safety Holdings Corp. and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report
on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.11 |
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of November 17, 2005 between
American Safety Holdings Corp., as guarantor, and Wilmington
Trust Company, as guarantee trustee (incorporated by reference
to the Exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 16, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.12 |
|
Parent Guarantee Agreement dated as of November 17, 2005
between American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. and Wilmington
Trust Company (incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to the
Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005
(File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Subscription Agreement dated as of November 17, 2005 among
American Safety Capital Trust III, American Safety Holdings
Corp. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to the Exhibits to the Current Report on
Form 8-K dated November 16, 2005 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
*5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Appleby Spurling Hunter |
|
|
*8 |
.1 |
|
Tax Opinion of Troutman Sanders LLP |
|
|
10 |
.1+ |
|
Employment Agreement between American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. and Stephen R. Crim (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 21,
2005. (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.2+ |
|
Employment Agreement between American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. and Joseph D. Scollo (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 21,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.2a+ |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between American
Safety Insurance Services, Inc. and Joseph D. Scollo
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to American
Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 1, 2006 (File
No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.3+ |
|
Employment Agreement between American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc. and William C. Tepe (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to American Safety Insurance Holdings,
Ltd.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 15, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.4+ |
|
Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd.(Registration No. 333-42749) as filed with
the SEC on January 27, 1998) |
|
|
10 |
.5+ |
|
First Amendment to the Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.49(b) to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety Insurance
Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-100065) as filed with the
SEC on September 25, 2002) |
|
|
10 |
.6+ |
|
1998 Director Stock Award Plan (as amended through
June 23, 2005) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Lease Agreement between 1845 Tenants-In-Common (formerly known
as Windy Hill Exchange, L.L.C.) and American Safety Insurance
Services, Inc. (formerly known as Environmental Management
Services, Inc.) for office space in Atlanta, Georgia
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. (Registration No. 333-42749) as
filed with the SEC on December 19, 1997) |
|
|
10 |
.7(a) |
|
First Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated July 1,
1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(a) to the
Form 10-K of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
II-9
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.7(b) |
|
Second Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated
March 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4(b) to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7(c) |
|
Third Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated
March 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4(c) to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.7(d) |
|
Fourth Amendment to Commercial Lease Agreement dated
August 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4(d) to the Form 10-K of American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amended and Restated Program Management Agreement dated as of
May 31, 2002 among American Safety Insurance Services,
Inc., American Safety Casualty Insurance Company, American
Safety Indemnity Company and American Safety Risk Retention
Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Exhibits to
Registrants Registration Statement filed
September 25, 2002 on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-100065)) |
|
|
12 |
.1 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 12 to the Form 10-K for American Safety
Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Letter from KPMG LLP regarding change in Certifying Accountant
(incorporated by reference to the Exhibit to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed August 2, 2004 (File
No. 001-4795)) |
|
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the
Form 10-K for American Safety Insurance Holdings, Ltd. for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (File No. 001-14795)) |
|
|
*23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Appleby Spurling Hunter (included in Exhibit 5.1) |
|
|
*23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Troutman Sanders LLP (included in Exhibit 8.1) |
|
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP |
|
*24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney |
|
*99 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Steven L. Groot |
|
|
|
* |
|
Previously filed. |
|
+ |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
II-10