Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[Mark One]
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 001-33057
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0837053 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
220 Miracle Mile |
|
|
Suite 234 |
|
|
Coral Gables, Florida
|
|
33134 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (305) 529-2522
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 12,527,564 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were
outstanding as of May 11, 2007.
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
(a development stage company)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
19,064,940 |
|
|
$ |
20,434,702 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
86,230 |
|
|
|
85,787 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
184,805 |
|
|
|
67,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
19,335,975 |
|
|
|
20,587,822 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
22,180 |
|
|
|
20,157 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
20,388 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
19,378,543 |
|
|
$ |
20,619,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
312,465 |
|
|
$ |
448,072 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
211,881 |
|
|
|
324,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
524,346 |
|
|
|
772,846 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share,
100,000,000 shares authorized, 12,527,564 and
12,516,620 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
12,528 |
|
|
|
12,517 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
25,852,961 |
|
|
|
25,593,330 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(7,011,292 |
) |
|
|
(5,759,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
18,854,197 |
|
|
|
19,846,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
19,378,543 |
|
|
$ |
20,619,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
3
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
(a development stage company)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from January 4, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 (date of |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
inception) to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
762,520 |
|
|
|
162,615 |
|
|
|
3,866,942 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
734,626 |
|
|
|
155,382 |
|
|
|
3,587,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1,497,146 |
|
|
|
317,997 |
|
|
|
7,454,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,497,146 |
) |
|
|
(317,997 |
) |
|
|
(7,454,856 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
245,068 |
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
443,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(1,252,078 |
) |
|
|
(312,829 |
) |
|
|
(7,011,292 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,252,078 |
) |
|
$ |
(312,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,011,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
basic and diluted |
|
|
12,518,809 |
|
|
|
6,887,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
4
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
(a development stage company)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Stage |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,517 |
|
|
$ |
25,593,330 |
|
|
$ |
(5,759,214 |
) |
|
$ |
19,846,633 |
|
Issuance of stock options
for services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,330 |
|
Amortization of
restricted
shares for services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
Issuance of common
stock for services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
59,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,274 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,252,078 |
) |
|
|
(1,252,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,528 |
|
|
$ |
25,852,961 |
|
|
$ |
(7,011,292 |
) |
|
$ |
18,854,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
5
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
(a development stage company)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from January 4, |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
2002 (date of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
inception) through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,252,078 |
) |
|
$ |
(312,829 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,011,292 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
8,757 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
200,368 |
|
|
|
120,563 |
|
|
|
3,080,356 |
|
Change in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in interest receivable |
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,230 |
) |
Increase in other prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
(126,360 |
) |
|
|
(2,396 |
) |
|
|
(205,193 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable |
|
|
(135,607 |
) |
|
|
(8,467 |
) |
|
|
312,464 |
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses |
|
|
(53,619 |
) |
|
|
25,093 |
|
|
|
211,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,365,649 |
) |
|
|
(177,463 |
) |
|
|
(3,689,256 |
) |
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(4,113 |
) |
|
|
(6,309 |
) |
|
|
(30,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,113 |
) |
|
|
(6,309 |
) |
|
|
(30,937 |
) |
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,789,536 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,895,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,685,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(1,369,762 |
) |
|
|
(183,772 |
) |
|
|
18,964,940 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
20,434,702 |
|
|
|
771,127 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
19,064,940 |
|
|
$ |
587,355 |
|
|
$ |
19,064,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
6
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICAL PARTNERS, INC.
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. |
|
Organization and Description of Business. |
Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (the Company) is a development-stage specialty
pharmaceutical company focused on the acquisition, development and commercialization of
prescription drugs for the treatment of drug addiction. The Company was incorporated in Delaware
in July 2006. It is the successor by merger to Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc., a Florida
corporation, which commenced operations in January 2002.
The Company has incurred operating losses in each period from inception through March 31,
2007. The Company has been able to fund its cash needs to date through an initial funding from its
founders, four subsequent private placements and an initial public offering (IPO) of its common
stock.
Merger
On September 7, 2006, the Company completed a merger with Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners,
Inc., a Florida corporation (CPP-Florida) in which CPP-Florida was merged with and into the
Company and all of CPP-Floridas assets, liabilities and attributes were transferred to the Company
by operation of law. Prior to the merger, the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of
CPP-Florida. The merger was effected to reincorporate the Company in Delaware.
2. |
|
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. |
|
a. |
|
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY. Since inception, the Company has devoted
substantially all of its efforts to business planning, research and development,
recruiting management and technical staff, acquiring operating assets and raising
capital. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage and the
Companys financial statements are presented in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.
The Companys primary focus is on the development and commercialization of the chemical
compound gamma-vinyl-GABA, commonly referred to as vigabatrin, as a potential treatment
for drug addiction, including cocaine addiction, methamphetamine addiction, and certain
obsessive compulsive disorders. |
|
|
b. |
|
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed
financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting of interim financial information.
Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. |
7
2. |
|
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. (continued) |
|
|
|
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial
statements of the Company contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods presented. The interim condensed
financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim financial reporting.
Accordingly, these statements do not include all the disclosures normally required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in the
Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
consolidated results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or for
the full fiscal year. |
|
|
c. |
|
USE OF ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
|
d. |
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by
dividing net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by
dividing net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of common stock
equivalents, such as restricted common stock and stock options. For all periods
presented, all common stock equivalents were excluded because their inclusion would
have been anti-dilutive. |
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents as of
March 31, 2007 included (i) stock
options to purchase 2,458,149 shares of common stock at exercise prices
ranging from $0.69 to $6.00 per share and (ii) 15,000 shares of restricted common
stock that will vest over the next three years. |
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents as of
March 31, 2006 included stock
options to purchase 2,206,333 shares of common stock at exercise prices
ranging from $0.69 to $2.98 per share. |
|
|
e. |
|
STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS. Through July 2006, the Company did not have a formal
stock option plan, although stock options were granted pursuant to written agreements.
In July 2006, the Company adopted the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan). See Note
7. |
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, there were outstanding stock options to purchase 2,458,149
shares of common stock (including options to purchase 105,888 shares granted under
the Plan), of which stock options to purchase 2,243,672 shares of common stock were
exercisable as of March 31, 2007. Additionally, as of March 31, 2007 there were
15,000 shares of restricted common stock granted under the Plan, none of which were
vested. |
|
|
|
|
For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded
stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Research & development |
|
$ |
78,393 |
|
|
$ |
82,068 |
|
General & administrative |
|
|
121,975 |
|
|
|
38,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock based compensation |
|
$ |
200,368 |
|
|
$ |
120,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
2. |
|
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies. (continued) |
|
f. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
No. 157). This statement provides a single definition of fair value, a framework
for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosures concerning fair value.
Previously, different definitions of fair value were contained in various accounting
pronouncements creating inconsistencies in measurement and disclosures. SFAS No. 157
applies under those previously issued pronouncements that prescribe fair value as
the relevant measure of value, except SFAS No. 123(R) and related interpretations
and pronouncements that require or permit measurement similar to fair value but are
not intended to measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 157, but does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material
impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
159 (SFAS 159) The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The provisions of SFAS 159 will
be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is in the
process of determining the effect, if any, the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its
financial statements. |
3. |
|
Property and Equipment. |
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net consists of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
$ |
21,651 |
|
|
$ |
18,368 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
8,457 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(8,758 |
) |
|
|
(6,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
22,180 |
|
|
$ |
20,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Accrued Liabilities. |
|
|
|
Accrued expenses consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Common stock issuable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59,274 |
|
Accrued license fee |
|
|
165,869 |
|
|
|
165,869 |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
72,571 |
|
Accrued compensation & benefits |
|
|
15,201 |
|
|
|
21,198 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,811 |
|
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
211,881 |
|
|
$ |
324,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The Company has executed noncancellable operating lease agreements for its corporate offices.
As of March 31, 2007, future minimum lease payments under the noncancellable operating lease
agreements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
37,896 |
|
2008 |
|
|
63,564 |
|
2009 |
|
|
58,694 |
|
2010 |
|
|
60,455 |
|
2011 |
|
|
62,268 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
47,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
330,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2007 the Company entered into a new lease
agreement for its corporate offices in Coral Gables, Florida. Rent expense was $7,711 and $4,651 for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The Companys office leases expire on various dates from December 2007 to September
2012.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, (FIN No. 48), on January 1, 2007. Previously, the Company had accounted for
tax contingencies in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting
for Contingencies. As required by FIN 48, which clarifies
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after
determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely sustain the position following an
audit. For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the
financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. At the adoption date, the
Company applied FIN 48 to all tax positions for which the statute of limitation remained open. No
resulting unrecognized tax benefits were identified in connection with the implementation of FIN
48.
The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states
jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the
related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to
apply. The Company is not subject to U.S. federal, state and local
tax examinations by tax authorities for the years before 2002. If the
Company were to subsequently record an unrecognized tax benefit,
associated penalties and tax related interest expense would be
reported as a component of income tax expense.
Stock Options
The Company has granted stock options to employees, officers, directors and scientific
advisors of the Company generally, at exercise prices equal to the market value of the stock at the
date of grant. The options generally vest ratably over four years, based on continued employment,
with a maximum term of 5 to 10 years.
10
7. |
|
Stock Compensation. (continued) |
|
|
|
The tables below summarize options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,374,149 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.95 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,458,149 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
|
|
$ |
8,019,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,243,672 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
$ |
7,870,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$0.69 - $1.37 |
|
|
2,060,417 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
2,060,417 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
$2.98 |
|
|
291,844 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
|
145,922 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
$3.99 |
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
|
|
37,333 |
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
$6.00 |
|
|
61,888 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,458,149 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
2,243,672 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123(R)
Share-Based Payment (SFAS No.123R) beginning January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective
transition method. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the
fair value of stock options on the date of grant. This model derives the fair value of stock
options based on certain assumptions related to expected stock price volatility, expected option
life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The Companys expected volatility is based on
the historical volatility of other publicly traded development stage companies in the same
industry. The estimated expected option life is based upon estimated employee exercise patterns
and considers whether and the extent to which the options are in-the-money. The risk-free interest
rate assumption is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve appropriate for the estimated expected
life of the Companys stock options awards. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, the assumptions used were an estimated annual volatility of 100%, average expected holding
periods of four to five years, and risk-free interest rates of 4.57%
and 5.50%, respectively. The
expected dividend rate is zero and no forfeiture rate was applied.
The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 were $2.73 and $5.42, respectively. The total fair value
of vested stock options for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $129,753 and $23,729,
respectively.
As of March 31, 2007, there was approximately $964,000 of unrecognized compensation expense
related to non-vested stock compensation awards granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.71 years.
11
7. |
|
Stock Compensation. (continued) |
Restricted Stock Units
Under the Plan, participants may be granted restricted stock units, each of which represents a
conditional right to receive shares of common stock in the future. The restricted stock units
granted under this plan generally vest ratably over a four-year period. Upon vesting, the
restricted stock units will convert into an equivalent number of shares of common stock. The
amount of expense relating to the restricted stock units is based on the closing market price of
the Companys common stock on the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period. Restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2007
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Average Grant Date |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded stock-based compensation totaling $5,038 and $0, respectively, related to
restricted stock units granted to a new employee during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. As of March 31,
2007, there was $55,412 of total restricted stock unit compensation expense related to non-vested
awards not yet recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.75 years.
8. |
|
Related Party Transactions. |
Since its inception in 2002, the Company has entered into various consulting agreements with
non-employee officers and with members of the Companys Scientific Advisory Board. Several of these
agreements are with related parties under common ownership and control. During the three month
period ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid approximately $13,000 and $55,000,
respectively, in consulting fees to related parties.
In January 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with Patrick J. McEnany, to act as the
Companys Chief Executive Officer. The agreement called for an annual salary of $100,000 per year
commencing on March 1, 2005. The agreement stipulated that half of Mr.McEnanys salary was to be
deferred until the Company raised equity in the amount of not less than $2,000,000. Mr. McEnany
also deferred the other half of his compensation until the equity minimum was met. The condition
requiring full payment of this obligation was satisfied in July 2006 when the Company closed a
private placement, at which time all deferred compensation was paid to Mr. McEnany.
12
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
report and the information incorporated by reference into it includes forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe
harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in these sections. All statements regarding our
expected financial position and operating results, our business strategy, our financing plans and
forecasted demographic and economic trends relating to our business and industry are
forward-looking statements. These statements can sometimes be identified by our use of
forward-looking words such as may, will, anticipate, estimate, expect, or intend and
similar expressions. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. We cannot promise that our expectations described in such forward-looking statements
will turn out to be correct. Factors that may impact such forward-looking statements include, among
others, our ability to successfully complete clinical trials required to file a new drug
application for CPP-109, our product candidate based on vigabatrin, our ability to complete such
trials on a timely basis and within the budgets we establish for such trials, our ability to
protect our intellectual property, the activities of others who seek to develop and commercialize products
competitive to our products, changes in the regulations affecting our business, our ability to
attract and retain skilled employees, and changes in general economic conditions and interest
rates. The risk factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006 describes the significant risks associated with our business. We undertake no obligation to
update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Overview
We are a development-stage specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the acquisition,
development and commercialization of prescription drugs for the treatment of drug addiction. Our
initial product candidate is CPP-109, which is based on the chemical compound gamma-vinyl-GABA,
commonly referred to as vigabatrin. We intend to commence a U.S. Phase II clinical trial evaluating
CPP-109 as a treatment for cocaine addiction at the end of the 2007 second quarter and a U.S. Phase
II clinical trial evaluating CPP-109 as a treatment for methamphetamine addiction during the third
quarter of 2007.
We recently completed an initial public offering in which we raised net proceeds of
approximately $17.6 million. We are using these proceeds to complete the clinical and non-clinical
studies that we believe, based on currently available information, will be required for us to file
a new drug application, or NDA, for the use of CPP-109 to treat cocaine addiction. Subject to the
availability of funding, we also hope to develop CPP-109 for the treatment of other addictions.
There can be no assurance that we will ever receive approval of an NDA for CPP-109.
The successful development of CPP-109 or any other product we may develop, acquire, or license
is highly uncertain. We cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing, or estimated
expenses of the efforts necessary to complete the development of, or the period in which material
net cash inflows are expected to commence due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated
with developing, such products, including the uncertainty of:
|
|
|
the scope, rate of progress and expense of our clinical trials and our other product
development activities; |
|
|
|
|
the results of future clinical trials, and the number of clinical trials (and the
scope of such trials) that will be required to seek and obtain approval of an NDA for
CPP-109; and |
|
|
|
|
the expense of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and
other intellectual property rights. |
13
Research and development expenses, in the aggregate, represented approximately 51% of our
total operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Research and
development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for clinical trials and development costs
related to CPP-109, personnel and related costs related to our product development activities, and
outside professional fees related to clinical development and regulatory matters.
We expect that our research and development expenses will substantially increase due to the
estimated expenses of our planned U.S. Phase II clinical trials, our anticipated costs related to a
clinical trial that we are sponsoring which is presently being conducted in Mexico, and any
required Phase I studies and non-clinical studies that we may undertake. We estimate, based on the
information available to us at this date, that we will incur approximately $15.7 million in
expenses, in addition to costs previously incurred, for our further clinical trials and development
costs for CPP-109 to treat cocaine addiction. These estimates assume that only one U.S. Phase III
clinical trial will be required by the FDA before we are able to obtain approval of an NDA for
CPP-109.
The above costs include assumptions about facts and events that are outside of our control.
For example, most of the expenses for completing the development of CPP-109 to treat cocaine
addiction will be in the form of fees and expenses we will be required to pay a contract research
organization (CRO) to conduct this work for us. The actual cost to us could be significantly
greater than we currently expect. In addition, the FDA could require us to alter or delay our
clinical trials at any stage, which may significantly increase the costs of that trial, as well as
delay our commercialization of CPP-109 and our future revenue.
Recent Developments
Top-line results of bioequivalence study
On May 9, 2007, we issued a press release announcing that we have received positive
initial top-line results in our bioequivalence study demonstrating that CPP-109 (our
product-candidate based on vigabatrin) is bioavailable and bioequivalent to Sabril®, the version of
vigabatrin marketed in Europe by Sanofi Aventis. This data potentially provides a basis for
linking CPP-109 to the extensive body of published pre-clinical and clinical literature on Sabril®.
In the bioequivalence study, investigators randomized 30 healthy male and female subjects to
either of two treatments a 500 mg. tablet of Sabril® or 500 mg. tablet of CPP-109. The
researchers dispensed the assigned medication tablet to the participants after an overnight fast
and collected blood plasma samples before dosing. An additional 21 blood plasma samples were
collected after dosing over a period of 36 hours. After a washout period of eight days, each
participant was crossed over to receive the alternate tablet, and plasma samples were collected
according to the same schedule. A total of 28 subjects completed both arms of the study. This
study was conducted as recommended by the Food and Drug Administrations Guidance for Industry,
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products General
Considerations.
Bioequivalence of the two tablet formulations is supported by the pharmacokinetic data
collected for CPP-109 and Sabril®. Specifically, the maximum plasma concentration and area under
the curve for vigabatrin were similar for CPP-109 and Sabril® Tablets. The 90% geometric
confidence intervals attained for these pharmacokinetic parameters were well within the 80% to 125%
range recommended by the Food and Drug Administrations Guidance for Industry, Statistical
Approaches to Establishing Bioequivalence, and the two products meet the requirements to be
considered both bioavailable and bioequivalent.
While the top-line results of our bioequivalence study were positive, and while we anticipate
that the final results of the bioequivalence study will be positive, there can be no assurance that
the final results of the bioequivalence study will be positive.
A copy of our May 9, 2007 press release is Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-Q and is incorporated
herein by this reference.
14
Lease for new facilities
On March 26, 2007, we entered into a lease for approximately 1,616 square feet of
office space in a building located at 355 Alhambra Plaza in Coral Gables, Florida. The lease is for
a 63 month term and we will pay base rent under the new lease of approximately $56,560 per annum.
We expect to move into our new office facility in July 2007.
Status of U.S. Phase II clinical trial for cocaine addiction
We have retained Health Decisions, Inc. as the CRO to conduct our U.S. Phase II
clinical trial to evaluate CPP-109 as a treatment for cocaine addiction. Under the agreement, we
will pay the CRO approximately $3,700,000 over the next
15 months based on the achievement of milestones.
We
anticipate that our clinical trial will be a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
involving approximately 180 patients at multiple treatment sites in the United States and Canada.
To be eligible to participate in the trial, participants will have to
meet specific clinical standards for
cocaine dependence, as specified in DSM-IV, a set of diagnosis guidelines established for clinical
professionals. Additionally, trial participants cannot meet the DSM-IV criteria for dependence on
other addictive substances. Further, eye safety studies will be conducted on all trial
participants to determine the extent of visual field defects among such participants, if any.
The treatment phase of the trial is expected to be 12 weeks in duration, with subjects
randomly assigned into two equal groups. One group will receive CPP-109 and the second group will
receive a placebo. The primary endpoint of the trial will be the proportion of subjects in each
treatment group who are cocaine abstinent during the last two weeks of the treatment phase.
Secondary endpoints include, among others, the maximum number of consecutive treatment phase
cocaine non-use days. Subjects completing the treatment phase will be followed up for an additional
12 weeks to obtain additional information to support the safety and efficacy of CPP-109.
Basis of Presentation
Revenues
We are a development stage company and have had no revenues to date. We will not have
revenues until such time as we receive approval of an NDA for CPP-109 and successfully commercialize our
product, of which there can be no assurance.
Research and development expenses
Our research and development expenses consist of costs incurred for company-sponsored research
and development activities. These expenses consist primarily of direct and research-related
allocated overhead expenses such as facilities costs, material supply costs, and medical costs for
visual field defect testing. It also includes both cash and stock-based compensation paid to our
scientific advisors and consultants related to our product development efforts. To date, all of
our research and development resources have been devoted to the development of CPP-109. We expect
this to continue for the foreseeable future. Costs incurred in connection with research and
development activities are expensed as incurred.
Clinical trial activities require significant expenditures up front. We anticipate paying
significant portions of a trials cost before it begins, and incurring additional expenditures as
the trial progresses and reaches certain milestones.
Selling and marketing expenses
We do not currently have any selling or marketing expenses, as we have not yet received
approval for the commercialization of CPP-109. We expect we will begin to incur such costs upon
our filing of an NDA, so that we
15
can have a sales force in place to commence our selling efforts immediately upon receiving
approval of such NDA, of which there can be no assurance.
General and administrative expenses
Our
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries,
consulting fees and/or travel related expenses for certain employees,
consultants, directors and members of our Scientific Advisory Board. Other costs include
information technology, corporate administration functions, administrative
facility costs, regulatory fees, and professional fees for legal and accounting services.
Stock-based compensation
We recognize costs related to the issuance of stock-based awards to employees and consultants
by using the estimated fair value of the award at the date of grant, in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
Income taxes
We have incurred operating losses since inception. Our net deferred tax asset has a 100%
valuation allowance as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, as we believe it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If an ownership change, as defined
under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, occurs, the use of these carry-forwards may be subject to
limitation.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on
our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as
well as the reported revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate
our judgments, estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on the terms of underlying
agreements, our expected course of development, historical experience
and other factors that we believe
are reasonable based on the circumstances, the results of which form our managements basis for
making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The list below is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies.
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. There are also areas in which our managements
judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.
Our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report contain accounting
policies and other disclosures required by GAAP.
Pre-clinical study and clinical trial expenses
Research and development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Our expenses
related to clinical trials are expected to be based on actual and estimated costs of the services
received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple research institutions and the CRO
that conducts and manages our clinical trials. The financial terms of these agreements are subject
to negotiation and will vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows.
Generally, it is anticipated that these agreements will set forth the scope of the work to be
performed at a fixed fee or unit price. Payments under these contracts will depend on factors such
as the successful enrollment of patients or the completion of clinical trial milestones. Expenses
related to clinical trials generally are expected to be accrued based on contracted amounts applied
to the level of patient enrollment and activity according to the protocol. If timelines or
contracts are modified based upon changes in the clinical trial protocol or scope of work to be
performed, we would be required to modify our estimates accordingly on a prospective basis.
16
Stock-based compensation
Effective January 1, 2006 we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R,
Share-Based Payment. We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair
value of stock options on the date of grant. This model derives the fair value of stock options
based on certain assumptions related to expected stock price volatility, expected option life,
risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The Companys expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of other publicly traded development stage companies in the same industry.
The estimated expected option life is based upon estimated employee exercise patterns and considers
whether and the extent to which the options are in-the-money. The risk-free interest rate
assumption is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve appropriate for the estimated expected life
of the Companys stock options awards. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
the assumptions used were an estimated annual volatility of 100%, average expected holding periods
of four to five years, and risk-free interest rates of 4.57% and 5.50%, respectively. The expected
dividend rate is zero and no forfeiture rate was applied.
Results of Operations
Revenues. We had no revenues for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $762,520 and $162,615, respectively, including stock-based
compensation expense in each of the three month periods of $78,393 and $82,068, respectively. The
stock-based compensation is non-cash and relates to shares of common stock issued to several of our
consultants and scientific advisors for services rendered and the expense of stock options awards
and restricted stock awards to our employees, officers, directors and
scientific advisors. During the first quarter of 2007 cash expenses for research and development grew significantly compared to
amounts incurred in the first quarter of 2006. The increase primarily
related to expenses for raw materials and finished products
for use in our clinical trials, an unrestricted grant to the sponsor
of a clinical trial that is being conducted in Mexico by a member of
our scientific advisory board and our bioequivalence
study comparing CPP-109 to the
version of
Sabril®
marketed in Europe by Sanofi-Aventis. These expenses totaled
approximately $605,000 and $0, respectively for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
Selling and Marketing Expenses. We had no selling and marketing expenses during the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. We anticipate that we will begin to incur sales and
marketing expenses when we file an NDA for CPP-109, in order to develop a sales organization to
market CPP-109 and other products we may develop upon the receipt of
required approvals, of which there can be no assurance.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were $734,626 and
$155,382, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. These expenses include
$121,975 and $38,495, respectively, in stock-based non-cash compensation expense relating to the
vesting of stock options and restricted stock grants. General and administrative expenses
increased substantially from period to period due to the addition of several executives in late
2006 and early 2007 who were not previously employees in the prior period and the expenses related
to our being a publicly traded entity commencing in November 2006.
General and administrative expenses includes among other expenses, office expenses, legal and
accounting fees and travel expenses for our employees, consultants and members of our Scientific
Advisory Board. We expect general and administrative efforts to further increase in future periods
as we incur general non-research expenses relating to the monitoring and oversight of our clinical
trials and otherwise expend funds to continue to develop our business as described herein and in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2006.
17
Stock-Based Compensation. Total stock based compensation for the three months ended March 31,
2007 and 2006 was $200,368 and $120,563, respectively. As of March 31, 2007, we had outstanding
stock options to purchase 2,458,149 shares of our common stock, of which options to purchase
2,243,672 shares were vested and options to purchase 214,477 shares were unvested. We also had
15,000 shares of restricted common stock granted as of March 31, 2007, none of which were vested at
that date.
Interest Income. We reported interest income in all periods relating to our investment of
funds received from our private placements and IPO. Interest income increased substantially from
period to period due to our investment in the 2007 first quarter of the proceeds of our IPO. All
such funds were invested in short term interest bearing obligations, certificates of deposit and
direct or guaranteed obligations of the United States government.
Income taxes. We have incurred net operating losses since inception. In both the first
quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2006 we have applied a 100% valuation allowance against
our deferred tax asset as we believe that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset
will not be realized.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the net proceeds of
private placements of our equity securities and through our IPO. At March 31, 2007, we had cash
and cash equivalents of $19.1 million and working capital of $18.8 million. At December 31, 2006
we had cash and cash equivalents of $20.4 million and working capital of $19.8 million.
Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements
We have to date incurred operating losses, and we expect these losses to increase
substantially in the future as we expand our product development programs and prepare for the
commercialization of CPP-109. We anticipate using the net proceeds from our IPO to finance these
activities. It may take several years to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals to
commercialize CPP-109 in the United States.
We believe that our available resources will be sufficient to meet our projected operating
requirements for the next 24 months, including our requirements relating to obtaining necessary
regulatory approvals of CPP-109 for use in treating cocaine addiction.
Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:
|
|
|
the scope, rate of progress and cost of our clinical trials and other product
development activities; |
|
|
|
|
future clinical trial results; |
|
|
|
|
the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and other arrangements that we
may establish; |
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
|
the cost and delays in product development as a result of any changes in regulatory
oversight applicable to our products; |
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of competition and market developments; |
|
|
|
|
the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other
intellectual property rights; and |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we acquire or invest in other products. |
18
If we do not have sufficient resources to fund our operations and product development plans,
we may seek to raise additional funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings,
capital lease transactions, corporate collaborations or other means. We may seek to raise
additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we have
sufficient funds for planned operations. Any sale by us of additional equity or convertible debt
securities could result in dilution to our stockholders.
To the extent that we raise additional funds through collaborative arrangements, it may be
necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or grant sublicenses on terms that are not
favorable to us. We do not know whether additional funding will be available on acceptable terms,
or at all. If we are not able to secure additional funding when needed, we may have to delay,
reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more research and development programs or sales and
marketing initiatives.
Cash Flows
Net
cash used in operations was $1,365,649 and $177,463, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, net cash used in
operating activities was primarily attributable to our net loss of $1,252,078 adjusted for $202,458
of non-cash expenses, decreases of $135,607 in accounts payable and $53,619 in accrued expenses,
offset in part by an increase of $126,360 in prepaid expenses and deposits. Non-cash expenses
included depreciation and stock-based compensation expense. During the three months ended March 31,
2006, net cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to our net loss of $312,829
and a decrease in accounts payable of $8,467. These effects were partially offset by $121,136 of
non-cash, primarily stock-based expenses, and an increase in accrued
expenses and other liabilities of $25,093.
Net
cash used in investing activities was $4,113 and $6,309, respectively, for the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006. Such funds were used primarily to purchase computer equipment.
No cash was provided by (used in) financing activities for the three months ended March 31,
2007 or 2006.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2007, we had contractual obligations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
years |
|
Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
330,620 |
|
|
|
56,970 |
|
|
|
179,089 |
|
|
|
94,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
330,620 |
|
|
$ |
56,970 |
|
|
$ |
179,089 |
|
|
$ |
94,561 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are also obligated to make the following payments:
|
|
|
Payment to Brookhaven under our license agreement. We have agreed to pay Brookhaven a
fee of $100,000 in the year of NDA approval for CPP-109, $250,000 in each of the second and
third years following approval, and $500,000 per year thereafter until the license
agreement expires. |
|
|
|
|
Payments to our contract manufacturer. We are obligated to pay our contract
manufacturer approximately $513,200, with payments to be based on the achievement of
milestones relating to the schedule of work that it has agreed to perform for us. At March
31, 2007, we had paid approximately $445,000 of this amount. |
|
|
|
|
Employment agreements. We have entered into employments agreements with two of our
executive officers that require us to make aggregate base salary payments of $515,000 per
annum. |
19
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
We
currently have no debt and no capital leases. We have operating leases for our office
facilities. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as such term is defined in rules
promulgated by the SEC.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
This statement provides a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value,
and expanded disclosures concerning fair value. Previously, different definitions of fair value
were contained in various accounting pronouncements creating inconsistencies in measurement and
disclosures. SFAS No. 157 applies under those previously issued pronouncements that prescribe fair
value as the relevant measure of value, except SFAS No. 123(R) and related interpretations and
pronouncements that require or permit measurement similar to fair value but are not intended to
measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. We are evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157, but do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157
to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159 (SFAS No. 159) The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The
provisions of SFAS No. 159 will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. We are in the process of
determining the effect, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on our financial statements.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk represents the risk of changes in the value of market risk-sensitive instruments
caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. Changes in
these factors could cause fluctuations in our results of operations and cash flows.
Our
exposure to interest rate risk is currently confined to our cash that
is invested in highly liquid money market funds. The primary objective of our investment activities is to
preserve our capital to fund our product development activities and operations. We also seek to maximize income from our investments
without assuming significant risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our
investment portfolio. Our cash and investments policy emphasizes liquidity and preservation of
principal over other portfolio considerations.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
a. |
|
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of March 31, 2007, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted by us under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, was recorded, processed, summarized or
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the SEC, and
include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in such reports was accumulated and communicated to management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. |
|
|
b. |
|
There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that
could have a material effect, or are reasonably likely to have a material effect to the
internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation in connection with the
preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings.
There are many factors that affect our business and the results of our operations. In addition to
the information set forth in this quarterly report, you should carefully read and consider Item
1A. Risk Factors in Part I, and Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006, which contain a description of significant factors that might cause the
actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected
or desired.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS |
None
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None
|
10.1 |
|
Lease Agreement, dated March 26, 2007, between the Company and 355 Alhambra Plaza, Ltd. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
99.1 |
|
Press Release issued May 9, 2007 |
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jack Weinstein
|
|
|
|
Jack Weinstein |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date:
May 14, 2007
22
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated March 26, 2007, between the Company and 355 Alhambra Plaza, Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
Press Release issued May 9, 2007 |