10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 001-33077
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   38-3164336
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
29110 Inkster Road    
Suite 100   48034
Southfield, Michigan   (Zip Code)
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)    
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 762-6837
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
     Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer þ    Non-accelerated filer   o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding on May 5, 2009 was 17,929,837.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
Item
  Page  
       
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    19  
    35  
    35  
 
       
       
    36  
 EX-31.A
 EX-31.B
 EX-32.A
 EX-32.B

2


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)          
    (Dollars in thousands,  
    except share and per share data)  
ASSETS
               
Investments
               
Debt securities
  $ 528,271     $ 495,799  
Equity securities and other
    24,714       15,089  
Short-term
    38,537       32,142  
 
           
Total Investments
    591,522       543,030  
Cash and cash equivalents
    14,586       31,833  
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
    56,930       56,398  
Accrued investment income
    5,648       5,400  
Accrued profit sharing commissions
    12,095       11,315  
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
    145,023       135,617  
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    51,902       48,921  
Deferred acquisition costs
    27,147       27,369  
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
    38,776       39,351  
Goodwill
    25,483       25,483  
Deferred federal income taxes
          2,161  
Other assets
    16,529       16,775  
 
           
Total Assets
  $ 985,641     $ 943,653  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
               
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
  $ 400,152     $ 372,721  
Unearned premium reserves
    148,137       147,849  
Long-term debt
    67,013       67,013  
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
    55,867       49,419  
Premiums payable to insurance companies
    27,279       27,831  
Reinsurance payable on paid losses
    1,400       1,167  
Deferred federal income taxes
    415        
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
    10,994       16,016  
 
           
Total Liabilities
    711,257       682,016  
 
           
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 17,929,837 and 17,836,337 shares
    179       178  
Paid-in-capital
    162,569       161,957  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    426       (3,027 )
Retained earnings
    111,709       103,028  
Treasury stock; 33,600 and 33,600 shares
    (499 )     (499 )
 
           
Total Stockholders’ Equity
    274,384       261,637  
 
           
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 985,641     $ 943,653  
 
           
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)  
Operating Revenue
               
Net earned premiums
  $ 52,594     $ 43,571  
Commissions and fees
    6,894       4,053  
Net investment income
    6,434       4,848  
Net realized gains on investments
    1,757       1  
 
           
Total Operating Revenues
    67,679       52,473  
 
           
 
               
Operating Expenses
               
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
    30,493       23,444  
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
    13,329       8,213  
Underwriting, agency and other expenses
    9,223       5,984  
Amortization of intangible assets
    575       399  
 
           
Total Operating Expenses
    53,620       38,040  
 
           
 
               
Operating Income
    14,059       14,433  
Interest Expense
    1,416       1,464  
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
    (106 )     435  
 
           
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
    12,749       12,534  
Income Taxes
    4,068       3,898  
 
           
Income From Continuing Operations
    8,681       8,636  
Income From Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
          1,085  
 
           
Net Income
  $ 8,681     $ 9,721  
 
           
 
               
Basic Net Income Per Share:
               
Income From Continuing Operations
  $ 0.49     $ 0.48  
Income From Discontinued Operations
          0.06  
 
           
Total
  $ 0.49     $ 0.54  
 
           
 
               
Diluted Net Income Per Share:
               
Income From Continuing Operations
  $ 0.48     $ 0.46  
Income From Discontinued Operations
          0.06  
 
           
Total
  $ 0.48     $ 0.52  
 
           
 
               
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
               
Basic
    17,775,560       18,106,063  
 
           
Diluted
    18,109,331       18,793,264  
 
           
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
                                                 
                    Accumulated                    
                    Other                    
    Common     Paid-in     Comprehensive     Retained     Treasury        
    Stock     Capital     Income     Earnings     Stock     Total  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share data)  
Balance, January 1, 2008
  $ 180     $ 165,836     $ 1,177     $ 62,187     $     $ 229,380  
Exercise of stock options
    3       518                         521  
Stock-based compensation expense
          327                         327  
Common stock repurchased and held in treasury
                            (499 )     (499 )
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
                      9,721             9,721  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
                                               
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period, net of tax of ($436)
                809                   809  
Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax of $324
                (602 )                 (602 )
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax of $92
                (170 )                 (170 )
 
                                   
Total other comprehensive income
                                  37  
 
                                   
Total comprehensive income
                                  9,758  
 
                                   
Balance, March 31, 2008
  $ 183     $ 166,681     $ 1,214     $ 71,908     $ (499 )   $ 239,487  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Balance, January 1, 2009
  $ 178     $ 161,957     $ (3,027 )   $ 103,028     $ (499 )   $ 261,637  
Issuance of restricted stock
    1       (1 )                        
Stock-based compensation expense
          613                         613  
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
                      8,681             8,681  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
                                               
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period, net of tax of ($1,899)
                3,527                   3,527  
Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax of ($25)
                46                   46  
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax of $64
                (120 )                 (120 )
 
                                   
Total other comprehensive income
                                  3,453  
 
                                   
Total comprehensive income
                                  12,134  
 
                                   
Balance, March 31, 2009
  $ 179     $ 162,569     $ 426     $ 111,709     $ (499 )   $ 274,384  
 
                                   
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
               
Net Income
  $ 8,681     $ 9,721  
Less: Income from discontinued operations
          1,085  
 
           
Income from continuing operations
    8,681       8,636  
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities
               
Depreciation and amortization
    998       750  
Realized gains on investments
    (1,757 )     (1 )
Deferrals of acquisition costs, net
    222       (5,058 )
Deferred income taxes
    2,575       (221 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    613       327  
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in assets and liabilities
               
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
    (532 )     (1,443 )
Accrued investment income
    (248 )     47  
Receivable from related entity
          75  
Accrued profit sharing commissions
    (780 )     2,889  
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
    (9,406 )     (9,999 )
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    (2,981 )     4,975  
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
    27,431       24,459  
Unearned premium reserves
    288       8,802  
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
    6,448       2,547  
Reinsurance payable on paid losses
    233       842  
Premiums payable to insurance companies
    (552 )     (3,745 )
Other
    (5,151 )     (8,743 )
 
           
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities — Continuing Operations
    26,082       25,139  
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities — Discontinued Operations
          1,023  
 
           
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities — Total
    26,082       26,162  
 
               
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
               
Cost of short-term investments acquired
    (127,598 )     (135,182 )
Proceeds from disposals of short-term investments
    121,202       155,618  
Cost of debt and equity securities acquired
    (63,161 )     (52,616 )
Proceeds from debt and equity securities
    26,228       27,410  
Acquisition, net of cash acquired
          (18,466 )
Cost of fixed asset purchases
          (544 )
 
           
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
    (43,329 )     (23,780 )
 
               
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
               
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
           
Stock issued on stock options exercised
          521  
Repurchase of common stock
          (499 )
Issuance of long-term debt
           
 
           
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities
          22  
 
           
 
               
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents
    (17,247 )     2,404  
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
    31,833       18,432  
 
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period
  $ 14,586     $ 20,836  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $ 1,372     $ 1,787  
Income taxes
  $     $  
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
     Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes of First Mercury Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries (“FMFC” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Readers are urged to review the Company’s 2008 audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a more complete description of the Company’s business and accounting policies. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the full year. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 was derived from the Company’s audited annual consolidated financial statements.
     Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
     Use of Estimates
     In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses reported for the periods then ended. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term relate primarily to the determination of the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and valuation of intangible assets.
     Recently Issued Accounting Standards
     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP FAS 115-2”). FSP FAS 115-2 modifies the existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance to require the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment when an entity has the intent to sell a debt security or when it is more likely than not an entity will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. Additionally, FSP FAS 115-2 changes the presentation and amount of other-than-temporary losses recognized in the income statement for instances when the Company determines that there is a credit loss on a debt security but it is more likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to the anticipated recovery of its remaining cost basis. For these debt securities, the amount representing the credit loss will be reported as an impairment loss in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income and the amount related to all other factors will be reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 also requires the presentation of other-than-temporary impairments separately from realized gains and losses on the face of the income statement. In addition to the changes in measurement and presentation, FSP FAS 115-2 is intended to enhance the existing disclosure requirements for other-than-temporary impairments and requires all disclosures related to other-than-temporary impairments in both interim and annual periods. The provisions of FSP FAS 115-2 are effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to early adopt FSP FAS 115-2/124-2 effective March 31, 2009 as this standard would have no material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”). Under FSP FAS 157-4, if an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly; the entity shall place little, if any weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to adopt FSP FAS 157-4 effective March 31, 2009 as this standard would not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to adopt FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 effective March 31, 2009.

7


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Concluded)
     We adopted the following accounting standards in the first quarter 2009, none of which had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity:
    SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations;”
 
    SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51;”
 
    SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;”
 
    FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities;” and
 
    FSP FAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.”
2. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
American Management Corporation
     On February 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of American Management Corporation (“AMC”). AMC is a managing general agency (“MGA”) that has focused primarily on the niche fuel-related marketplace for over 20 years. In addition, AMC owns and operates American Underwriters Insurance Company (“AUIC”), a single state, non-standard auto insurance company domiciled in the state of Arkansas, and AMC Re, Inc. (“AMC Re”), a captive reinsurer incorporated under the laws of Arkansas. AMC underwrites premiums for third party carriers and for AUIC. The acquisition gave the Company access to an established and experienced specialty admitted underwriting franchise with a definable niche market.
     The cash purchase price was $38.1 million, which was financed through cash on hand. We incurred $0.8 million in acquisition related costs, which are included in the initial cost of the investment of $38.9 million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company and the seller entered into an escrow agreement whereby $4.0 million of the cash purchase price was escrowed with a major financial institution to partially secure the majority selling shareholder’s indemnity obligations of up to $12.0 million under the stock purchase agreement.
     The results of operations of AMC and the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are included in our consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date. The estimated excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired of $13.4 million was recorded as goodwill in the amount of $25.5 million. We have completed the valuations of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired with the new business and have finalized the allocation of the excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired. The acquired goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

8


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
2. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS — (Concluded)
     The following table represents the final allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
         
    $ in thousands  
Assets Acquired
       
Investments
  $ 8,988  
Cash and cash equivalents
    20,012  
Premiums receivable
    19,570  
Other assets
    1,133  
Goodwill
    25,483  
Intangible assets:
       
Agent relationships
    9,150  
Tradename
    2,130  
Customer relationships
    520  
 
     
Total Assets Acquired
  $ 86,986  
 
     
 
       
Liabilities Assumed
       
Premiums payable to insurance companies
  $ 23,218  
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
    4,490  
Unearned premium reserves
    1,734  
Deferred federal income taxes
    3,917  
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
    14,745  
 
     
Total Liabilities Assumed
    48,104  
 
     
 
       
Net Assets Acquired
  $ 38,882  
 
     
     Agent relationships are being amortized as the economic benefits of these intangible assets are utilized over their estimated useful lives of approximately 18 years. The tradename is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of 20 years. The customer relationships are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the utilization of the economic benefits of these assets, over their estimated useful lives of 15 years.
     In connection with the AMC acquisition, we entered into an operating lease agreement for real property in Conway, Arkansas with an entity owned by the former majority shareholder and current president of AMC. The lease term is for ten years, with annual rent of approximately $0.5 million, payable in monthly installments.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
     On June 27, 2008, the Company sold all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of ARPCO Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“ARPCO”) for a purchase price of $43.0 million. The net assets disposed of in the transaction were $7.2 million and were principally intangible assets.
     The operating results of discontinued operations included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income are as follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2009   2008
    (Dollars in thousands)
Revenues
  $     $ 2,976  
Income Before Income Taxes
  $     $ 1,773  

9


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
4. NET INCOME PER SHARE
     Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if common stock equivalents were issued and exercised.
     The following is a reconciliation of basic number of common shares outstanding to diluted common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)  
Income from Continuing Operations
  $ 8,681     $ 8,636  
Income from Discontinued Operations
          1,085  
 
           
Net income as reported
    8,681       9,721  
Net income allocated to unvested restricted stock shares
    (28 )     (13 )
 
           
Net income available to common
  $ 8,653     $ 9,708  
 
               
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
               
 
               
Basic number of common shares outstanding
    17,775,560       18,106,063  
 
           
Dilutive effect of stock options
    333,669       686,122  
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted stock
    102       1,079  
 
           
Dilutive number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
    18,109,331       18,793,264  
 
           
 
               
Basic Net Income Per Common Share:
               
Income from Continuing Operations
  $ 0.49     $ 0.48  
Income from Discontinued Operations
          0.06  
 
           
Total
  $ 0.49     $ 0.54  
 
           
 
               
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share:
               
Income from Continuing Operations
  $ 0.48     $ 0.46  
Income from Discontinued Operations
          0.06  
 
           
Total
  $ 0.48     $ 0.52  
 
           
 
               
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from diluted net income per common share
    1,221,688       706,188  
 
           
     On January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”), which requires that unvested restricted stock with a nonforfeitable right to receive dividends be included in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 did not have an impact on our reported earnings per share amounts.

10


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. INVESTMENTS
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable investment securities classified as available-for-sale at March 31, 2009 by major security type were as follows:
                                 
            Gross Unrealized        
    Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Market Value  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $ 5,039     $ 254     $     $ 5,293  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    81,037       3,643       (12 )     84,668  
Government agency obligations
    3,145       65             3,210  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    74,406       929       (6,316 )     69,019  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    204,477       8,107       (560 )     212,024  
Corporate bonds
    111,061       2,672       (4,662 )     109,071  
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    479,165       15,670       (11,550 )     483,285  
Preferred stocks
    1,416             (618 )     798  
Short-term investments
    38,537                   38,537  
 
                       
Total
  $ 519,118     $ 15,670     $ (12,168 )   $ 522,620  
 
                       
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable investment securities classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2008 by major security type were as follows:
                                 
            Gross Unrealized        
    Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Market Value  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $ 5,256     $ 307     $     $ 5,563  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    82,548       2,422       (39 )     84,931  
Government agency obligations
    3,163       76             3,239  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    71,378       337       (7,087 )     64,628  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    205,425       5,634       (694 )     210,365  
Corporate bonds
    89,383       1,499       (3,874 )     87,008  
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    457,153       10,275       (11,694 )     455,734  
Preferred stocks
    1,416             (367 )     1,049  
Short-term investments
    32,142                   32,142  
 
                       
Total
  $ 490,711     $ 10,275     $ (12,061 )   $ 488,925  
 
                       
     The amortized cost and market value of debt securities classified as available-for-sale, by contractual maturity, as of March 31, 2009 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Additionally, the expected maturities of the Company’s investments in putable bonds fluctuate inversely with interest rates and therefore may also differ from contractual maturities.
                 
    Amortized Cost     Market Value  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Due in one year or less
  $ 73,469     $ 73,567  
Due after one year through five years
    175,422       179,279  
Due after five years through ten years
    108,355       109,530  
Due after ten years
    6,429       6,557  
 
           
 
    363,675       368,933  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    81,037       84,668  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    74,406       69,019  
 
           
Total
  $ 519,118     $ 522,620  
 
           

11


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
5. INVESTMENTS — (Concluded)
Hybrid Instruments
     As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the market value of convertible securities accounted for as hybrid instruments was $51.2 million and $43.5 million, respectively. Convertible bonds and bond units had a market value of $44.2 million and $39.0 million and were included in Debt securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Convertible preferred stocks had a market value of $7.0 million and $4.5 million and were included in Equity securities and other in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company recorded an increase in the fair value of the hybrid instruments of $2.5 million in Net realized gains on investments for the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no convertible securities that were not accounted for as hybrid instruments in accordance with SFAS 155.
Alternative Investments
     During March 2008 the Company invested $10.0 million in a limited partnership, which invests in high yield convertible securities. An additional $2.0 million was invested during January 2009 for a total cost of $12.0 million. The market value of this investment was $7.9 million at March 31, 2009. During June 2008, the Company invested $5.0 million in a limited partnership, which invests in distressed structured finance products. An additional $5.0 million was invested during March 2009 for a total cost of $10.0 million. The market value of this investment was $9.8 million at March 31, 2009. The Company elected the fair value option for these investments in accordance with SFAS 159. The change in fair value of these investments is recorded in Net investment income and Net realized gains on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. These investments are recorded in Equity securities and other in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
6. INCOME TAXES
     At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations, and we have taken no tax positions which would require disclosure under FIN 48. Although the IRS is not currently examining any of our income tax returns, tax years 2005, 2006 and 2007 remain open and are subject to examination.
     The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries. Taxes are allocated among the Company’s subsidiaries based on the Tax Allocation Agreement employed by these entities, which provides that taxes of the entities are calculated on a separate-return basis at the highest marginal tax rate.
     Income taxes in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income differ from the statutory tax rate of 35.0% primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses, and the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest.

12


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
7. LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES
     The Company establishes a reserve for both reported and unreported covered losses, which includes estimates of both future payments of losses and related loss adjustment expenses. The following represents changes in those aggregate reserves for the Company during the periods presented below:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 372,721     $ 272,365  
Less reinsurance recoverables
    128,552       91,444  
 
           
Net Balance, beginning of period
    244,169       180,921  
 
           
 
               
AUIC net reserves, date of acquisition
          4,490  
 
               
Incurred Related To
               
Current year
    31,243       23,444  
Prior years
    (750 )      
 
           
Total Incurred
    30,493       23,444  
 
           
 
               
Paid Related To
               
Current year
    906       334  
Prior years
    12,547       10,275  
 
           
Total Paid
    13,453       10,609  
 
           
 
               
Net Balance
    261,209       198,246  
Plus reinsurance recoverables
    138,943       103,068  
 
           
Balance, end of period
  $ 400,152     $ 301,314  
 
           
8. REINSURANCE
     Net written and earned premiums, including reinsurance activity, were as follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Written Premiums
               
Direct
  $ 73,120     $ 76,214  
Assumed
    4,758       4,993  
Ceded
    (28,053 )     (22,704 )
 
           
Net Written Premiums
  $ 49,825     $ 58,503  
 
           
 
               
Earned Premiums
               
Direct
  $ 73,304     $ 68,653  
Assumed
    4,287       3,752  
Ceded
    (25,072 )     (27,679 )
Earned but unbilled premiums
    75       (1,155 )
 
           
Net Earned Premiums
  $ 52,594     $ 43,571  
 
           
     The Company manages its credit risk on reinsurance recoverables by reviewing the financial stability, A.M. Best rating, capitalization, and credit worthiness of prospective and existing risk-sharing partners. The Company customarily collateralizes reinsurance balances due from unauthorized reinsurers through funds withheld, grantor trusts, or stand-by letters of credit issued by highly rated banks.
     The Company’s 2009 and 2008 ceded reinsurance program includes quota share reinsurance agreements with authorized reinsurers that were entered into and are accounted for on a “funds withheld” basis. Under the funds withheld basis, the Company

13


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
8. REINSURANCE (Concluded)
records the ceded premiums payable to the reinsurer, less ceded paid losses and loss adjustment expenses receivable from the reinsurer, less any amounts due to the reinsurer for the reinsurer’s margin, or cost of the reinsurance contract, as a liability, and reported $55.9 million and $49.4 million as Funds held under reinsurance treaties in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As specified under the terms of the agreements, the Company credits the funds withheld balance at stated interest crediting rates applied to the funds withheld balance. If the funds withheld liability is exhausted, interest crediting would cease and additional claim payments would be recoverable from the reinsurer.
     Interest cost on reinsurance contracts accounted for on a funds withheld basis is incurred during all periods in which a funds withheld liability exists or as otherwise specified under the terms of the contract and is included in Underwriting, agency and other expenses. The amount subject to interest crediting rates was $22.2 million and $17.9 million at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
9. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
     The Board of Directors of the Company authorized a share repurchase plan to purchase up to 1.5 million shares of common stock through open market or privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program expires on August 18, 2009. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has 801,423 shares of remaining capacity under the share repurchase program. Shares purchased under the program are retired and returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares.
10. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
     The 1998 Stock Compensation Plan (the “1998 Plan”) was established September 3, 1998. Under the terms of the plan, directors, officers, employees and key individuals may be granted options to purchase the Company’s common stock. Option and vesting periods and option exercise prices are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, provided no stock options shall be exercisable more than ten years after the grant date. All outstanding stock options under the plan became fully vested on August 17, 2005 under the change in control provision in the plan. Of the 4,625,000 shares of the Company’s common stock initially reserved for future grant under the 1998 Plan, shares available for future grant totaled 2,443,387 at March 31, 2009, however, the Company does not intend to issue any additional awards under this plan.
     The First Mercury Financial Corporation Omnibus Incentive Plan of 2006 (the “Omnibus Plan”) was established October 16, 2006. The Company has reserved 1,500,000 shares of its common stock for future granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SAR”), restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSU”), deferred stock units (“DSU”), performance shares, performance cash awards, and other stock or cash awards to employees and non-employee directors at any time prior to October 15, 2016. All of the terms of the vesting or other restrictions will be determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The exercise price will not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company granted 197,500 stock options and 93,500 shares of restricted stock to employees under the Omnibus Plan. The stock options and shares of restricted stock vest in three equal installments over a period of three years commencing on March 5, 2010. Stock-based compensation will be recognized over the expected vesting period of the stock options and shares of restricted stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company granted 148,500 stock options and 15,000 shares of restricted stock to employees under the Omnibus plan. The stock options and shares of restricted stock vest in three equal installments over a period of three years commencing on March 6, 2009. Stock-based compensation will be recognized over the expected vesting period of the stock options and shares of restricted stock. Shares available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan totaled 185,740 at March 31, 2009. A proposal currently pending before the Company’s stockholders would amend and restate the Omnibus Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 1,650,000 shares (which would bring the total number of shares reserved under the Omnibus Plant to 3,150,000) and to make certain other changes to the Omnibus Plan. The Company’s stockholders are voting on this proposal at the 2009 annual stockholders meeting scheduled for May 13, 2009.

14


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)
     The following table summarizes stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
                                 
    1998 Plan     Omnibus Plan  
    Number of     Weighted Average     Number of     Weighted Average  
    Options     Exercise Price     Options     Exercise Price  
Oustanding at January 1, 2008
    927,775     $ 2.24       573,688     $ 19.10  
Granted during the period
                148,500       14.93  
Forfeited during the period
                12,700       18.77  
Exercised during the period
    287,960       1.81              
Cancelled during the period
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at March 31, 2008
    639,815     $ 2.48       709,488     $ 18.24  
 
                               
Oustanding at January 1, 2009
    431,050     $ 2.82       932,188     $ 17.93  
Granted during the period
                197,500       13.01  
Forfeited during the period
                       
Exercised during the period
                       
Cancelled during the period
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at March 31, 2009
    431,050     $ 2.82       1,129,688     $ 17.07  
 
                               
Exercisable at:
                               
March 31, 2008
    639,815     $ 2.48       150,355     $ 18.75  
March 31, 2009
    431,050       2.82       379,465       18.43  
     The aggregate intrinsic value of fully vested options outstanding and exercisable under the 1998 Plan was $5.0 million at March 31, 2009. There was no aggregate intrinsic value of options expected to vest under the Omnibus Plan at March 31, 2009.
     There were no stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
     The number of stock option awards outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009 by range of exercise prices was as follows:
                                         
    Options Outstanding     Options Exercisable
            Weighted-Average   Weighted-Average           Weighted-Average
Range of
  Outstanding as of   Remaining   Exercise Price Per   Exercisable as of   Exercise Price Per
Exercisable Price
  March 31, 2009   Contractual Life   Share   March 31, 2009   Share
1998 Plan
                                       
$1.51 - $1.95
    319,125     3.85 Years   $ 1.71       319,125     $ 1.71  
$4.86 - $6.49
    111,925     1.55     5.97       111,925       5.97  
 
                                       
Total
    431,050     3.25     2.82       431,050       2.82  
 
                                       
 
                                       
Omnibus Plan
                                       
$10.98 - $14.93
    352,000     9.52 Years   $ 13.72       47,495     $ 14.93  
$17.00 - $20.75
    777,688     7.33     18.59       331,970       18.94  
 
                                       
Total
    1,129,688     8.01     17.07       379,465       18.43  
 
                                       
     As of March 31, 2009, there was approximately $5.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

15


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
10. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS — (Concluded)
     The fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were determined on the dates of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
                 
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2009   2008
Omnibus Plan
               
Expected term
    6.0       6.0  
Expected stock price volatility
    41.11 %     29.23 %
Risk-free interest rate
    2.16 %     2.90 %
Expected dividend yield
           
Estimated fair value per option
  $ 5.53     $ 5.13  
     The expected term of options was determined based on the simplified method from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 (“SAB 107”), as amended by Staff Accounting Bulletin 110 (“SAB 110”). Expected stock price volatility was based on an average of the volatility factors utilized by companies within the Company’s peer group with consideration given to the Company’s historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury securities with an equivalent remaining term. The Company has not paid dividends in the past.
     The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. The calculated fair value is recognized as compensation cost in the Company’s financial statements over the requisite service period of the entire award. Compensation cost is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant and evaluated and adjusted periodically to reflect the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. Any change in the forfeiture assumption is accounted for as a change in estimate, with the cumulative effect of the change on periods previously reported being reflected in the financial statements of the period in which the change is made. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
     Our available-for-sale investment portfolio consists of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments, and is recorded at fair value in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”). The change in the fair value of these investments is recorded as a component of Other comprehensive income (loss).
     We adopted FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”) effective January 1, 2008. Under this standard, we are permitted to elect to measure financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, with the change in fair value recorded in earnings. On January 1, 2008, we elected not to measure any eligible items using the fair value option in accordance with SFAS 159. We believe the current accounting is appropriate for our available-for-sale investments as we have the intent and ability to hold our investments, therefore, SFAS 159 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations on the adoption date.
     We also adopted FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) effective January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or would be paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, and establishes a framework to make the measurement of fair value more consistent and comparable. In determining fair value, we primarily use prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, or “market approach” as defined by SFAS 157. The implementation of SFAS 157 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. The implementation of SFAS 157 resulted in expanded disclosures about securities measured at fair value, as discussed below.
     SFAS 157 established a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that distinguishes between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (“observable inputs”) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (“unobservable inputs”). The hierarchy level assigned to each security in our available-for-sale, hybrid securities, and

16


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
alternative investments portfolios is based on our assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used in the valuation of such instrument at the measurement date. The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
      Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities. The fair values of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 1 category were based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market. The Level 1 category includes publicly traded equity securities; highly liquid U.S. Government notes, treasury bills and mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association; highly liquid cash management funds; and short-term certificates of deposit.
      Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 2 category were based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information and price quotes from well established independent broker-dealers. The independent pricing service monitors market indicators, industry and economic events, and for broker-quoted only securities, obtains quotes from market makers or broker-dealers that it recognizes to be market participants. The Level 2 category includes corporate bonds, municipal bonds, redeemable preferred stocks and certain publicly traded common stocks with no trades on the measurement date.
      Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, and involve management judgment.
     If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, a financial security’s hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. A number of our investment grade corporate bonds are frequently traded in active markets and traded market prices for these securities existed at March 31, 2009. These securities were classified as Level 2 at March 31, 2009 because our third party pricing service uses valuation models which use observable market inputs in addition to traded prices.
     The following table presents our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 classified by the SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy (as discussed above):
                                 
    Fair Value Measurements Using  
    Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Available for sale investments:
                               
Fixed maturity securities
  $ 483,285     $ 5,293     $ 477,379     $ 613  
Equity securities
    798             798        
Short-term investments
    38,537       38,537              
Hybrid securities
    51,172             51,172        
Alternative investments
    17,730             9,831       7,899  
 
                       
Total
  $ 591,522     $ 43,830     $ 539,180     $ 8,512  
 
                       
     Level 3 assets above include one asset-backed security collateralized by home equity loans with a market value of $0.6 million within fixed maturity securities. Liquidity remains extremely low in markets for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, especially those with ratings below AAA. This security’s market value was adjusted to a model price that assumed stressed default assumptions, which generated a 20.9% principal loss, and included a 10.5% discount rate. Also included within Level 3 assets is a $7.9 million investment in a limited partnership. At times, this limited partnership will invest in highly illiquid high yield convertible securities for which observable inputs are not available. The manager of this limited partnership valued this investment through an internally developed model.

17


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Concluded)
(Unaudited)
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS — (Concluded)
         
    Quarter Ended  
    March 31, 2009  
Level 3 investments as of January 1, 2009
  $ 6,282  
Purchases
    2,000  
Increase in market value
    230  
 
     
Level 3 investments as of March 31, 2009
  $ 8,512  
 
     
     The Company uses derivatives to hedge its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. For these derivatives, the Company uses quoted market prices to estimate fair value and includes the estimate as a Level 2 measurement.
12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
     The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income included the following:
                 
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Unrealized holding gains on securities, net of tax
  $ 1,956     $ 2,440  
Fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax
    (1,530 )     (1,226 )
 
           
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
  $ 426     $ 1,214  
 
           

18


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that relate to future periods and includes statements regarding our anticipated performance. Generally, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “plans” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements or industry results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: recent and future events and circumstances impacting financial, stock, and capital markets, and the responses to such events by governments and financial communities; the impact of catastrophic events and the occurrence of significant severe weather conditions on our operating results; our ability to maintain or the lowering or loss of one of our financial or claims-paying ratings; our actual incurred losses exceeding our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; the failure of reinsurers to meet their obligations; our inability to obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable prices; the failure of any loss limitations or exclusions or changes in claims or coverage; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions that we make such as our acquisition of AMC; our lack of long-term operating history in certain specialty classes of insurance; our ability to acquire and retain additional underwriting expertise and capacity; the concentration of our insurance business in relatively few specialty classes; the increasingly competitive property and casualty marketplace; fluctuations and uncertainty within the excess and surplus lines insurance industry; the extensive regulations to which our business is subject and our failure to comply with those regulations; our ability to maintain our risk-based capital at levels required by regulatory authorities; our inability to realize our investment objectives; and the risks identified in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or revise them or provide reasons why actual results may differ.
     The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
     Overview
     We are a provider of insurance products and services to the specialty commercial insurance markets, primarily focusing on niche and underserved segments where we believe that we have underwriting expertise and other competitive advantages. During our 35 years of underwriting security risks, we have established CoverX ® as a recognized brand among insurance agents and brokers and developed significant underwriting expertise and a cost-efficient infrastructure. Over the last eight years, we have leveraged our brand, expertise and infrastructure to expand into other specialty classes of business, particularly focusing on smaller accounts that receive less attention from competitors.
     First Mercury Financial Corporation (“FMFC”) is a holding company for our operating subsidiaries. Our operations are conducted with the goal of producing overall profits by strategically balancing underwriting profits from our insurance subsidiaries with the commissions and fee income generated by our non-insurance subsidiaries. FMFC’s principal operating subsidiaries are CoverX Corporation (“CoverX”), First Mercury Insurance Company (“FMIC”), First Mercury Casualty Company (“FMCC”), First Mercury Emerald Insurance Services, Inc. (“FM Emerald”), and American Management Corporation (“AMC”).
     CoverX produces and underwrites insurance policies for which we retain risk and receive premiums. As a wholesale insurance broker, CoverX markets our insurance policies through a nationwide network of wholesale and retail insurance brokers who then distribute these policies through retail insurance brokers. CoverX also provides underwriting services with respect to the insurance policies it markets in that it reviews the applications submitted for insurance coverage, decides whether to accept all or part of the coverage requested and determines applicable premiums. CoverX receives commissions from affiliated insurance companies, reinsurers, and non-affiliated insurers as well as policy fees from wholesale and retail insurance brokers.
     FM Emerald is a wholesale insurance agency producing commercial lines business on primarily an excess and surplus lines basis for CoverX via a producer agreement. As a wholesale insurance agency, FM Emerald markets insurance products for CoverX through a nationwide network of wholesale and retail insurance brokers who then distribute these products through retail insurance brokers.
     FMIC and FMCC are two of our insurance subsidiaries. FMIC writes substantially all the policies produced by CoverX. FMCC provides reinsurance to FMIC. FMIC and FMCC have entered into an intercompany pooling reinsurance agreement wherein all premiums, losses and expenses of FMIC and FMCC, including all past liabilities, are combined and apportioned between FMIC and FMCC in accordance with fixed percentages. FMIC also provides claims handling and adjustment services for policies produced by CoverX and directly written by third parties.

19


Table of Contents

     On June 27, 2008, the Company sold all of the outstanding capital stock of American Risk Pooling Consultants, Inc. (“ARPCO”). The results of ARPCO’s operations are presented as Discontinued Operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. ARPCO provided third party administrative services for risk sharing pools of governmental entity risks, including underwriting, claims, loss control and reinsurance services. ARPCO was solely a fee-based business and received fees for these services and commissions on excess per occurrence insurance placed in the commercial market with third party companies on behalf of the pools.
     On February 1, 2008, we acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of American Management Corporation. AMC is a managing general agency writing primarily commercial lines package policies focused primarily on the niche fuel-related marketplace. AMC distributes these insurance policies through a nationwide distribution system of independent general agencies. AMC underwrites these policies for third party insurance carriers and receives commission income for its services. AMC also provides claims handling and adjustment services for policies produced by AMC and directly written for third parties. In addition, AMC owns and operates American Underwriters Insurance Company (“AUIC”), a single state, non-standard auto insurance company domiciled in the state of Arkansas, and AMC Re, Inc. (“AMC Re”), a captive reinsurer incorporated under the provisions of the laws of Arkansas. Effective July 1, 2008, FMIC and AUIC entered into an intercompany reinsurance agreement wherein all premiums and losses of AUIC, including all past liabilities, are 100% assumed by FMIC.
     GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Performance Metrics
     Throughout this report, we present our operations in the way we believe will be most meaningful, useful, and transparent to anyone using this financial information to evaluate our performance. In addition to the GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America) presentation of net income and certain statutory reporting information, we show certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are valuable in managing our business and drawing comparisons to our peers. These measures are gross written premiums, net written premiums, and combined ratio.
     Following is a list of non-GAAP measures found throughout this report with their definitions, relationships to GAAP measures, and explanations of their importance to our operations:
     Gross written premiums. While net premiums earned is the related GAAP measure used in the statements of earnings, gross written premiums is the component of net premiums earned that measures insurance business produced before the impact of ceding reinsurance premiums, but without respect to when those premiums will be recognized as actual revenue. We use this measure as an overall gauge of gross business volume in our insurance underwriting operations with some indication of profit potential subject to the levels of our retentions, expenses, and loss costs.
     Net written premiums. While net premiums earned is the related GAAP measure used in the statements of earnings, net written premiums is the component of net premiums earned that measures the difference between gross written premiums and the impact of ceding reinsurance premiums, but without respect to when those premiums will be recognized as actual revenue. We use this measure as an indication of retained or net business volume in our insurance underwriting operations. It is an indicator of future earnings potential subject to our expenses and loss costs.
     Combined ratio. This ratio is a common industry measure of profitability for any underwriting operation, and is calculated in two components. First, the loss ratio is losses and settlement expenses divided by net premiums earned. The second component, the expense ratio, reflects the sum of policy acquisition costs and insurance operating expenses, net of insurance underwriting commissions and fees, divided by net premiums earned. The sum of the loss and expense ratios is the combined ratio. The difference between the combined ratio and 100 reflects the per-dollar rate of underwriting income or loss. For example, a combined ratio of 85 implies that for every $100 of premium we earn, we record $15 of pre-tax underwriting income.
     Critical Accounting Policies
     The critical accounting policies discussed below are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise significant judgment. We use significant judgments concerning future results and developments in making these critical accounting estimates and in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These judgments and estimates affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of material contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on a continual basis using information that we believe to be relevant. Actual results may differ materially from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
     Readers are also urged to review “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements thereto included in the Annual Report on

20


Table of Contents

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a more complete description of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
     Use of Estimates
     In preparing our consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses reported for the periods then ended. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term relate primarily to the determination of the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and valuation of intangible assets.
     Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
     The reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses represent our estimated ultimate costs of all reported and unreported losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred and unpaid at the balance sheet date. Our reserves reflect our estimates at a given time of amounts that we expect to pay for losses that have been reported, which are referred to as Case reserves, and losses that have been incurred but not reported and the expected development of losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses on reported cases, which are referred to as IBNR reserves. We do not discount the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses.
     We allocate the applicable portion of our estimated loss and loss adjustment expense reserves to amounts recoverable from reinsurers under ceded reinsurance contracts and report those amounts separately from our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as an asset on our balance sheet.
     The estimation of ultimate liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses is an inherently uncertain process, requiring the use of informed estimates and judgments. Our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves do not represent an exact measurement of liability, but are our estimates based upon various factors, including:
    actuarial projections of what we, at a given time, expect to be the cost of the ultimate settlement and administration of claims reflecting facts and circumstances then known;
 
    estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency;
 
    assessment of asserted theories of liability; and
 
    analysis of other factors, such as variables in claims handling procedures, economic factors, and judicial and legislative trends and actions.
     Most or all of these factors are not directly or precisely quantifiable, particularly on a prospective basis, and are subject to a significant degree of variability over time. In addition, the establishment of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves makes no provision for the broadening of coverage by legislative action or judicial interpretation or for the extraordinary future emergence of new types of losses not sufficiently represented in our historical experience or which cannot yet be quantified. Accordingly, the ultimate liability may be more or less than the current estimate. The effects of changes in the estimated reserves are included in the results of operations in the period in which the estimate is revised.
     Our reserves consist of reserves for property and liability losses, consistent with the coverages provided for in the insurance policies directly written or assumed by the Company under reinsurance contracts. In many cases, several years may elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us and our payment of the loss. Although we believe that our reserve estimates are reasonable, it is possible that our actual loss experience may not conform to our assumptions and may, in fact, vary significantly from our assumptions. Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly from the estimates included in our financial statements. We continually review our estimates and adjust them as we believe appropriate as our experience develops or new information becomes known to us.

21


Table of Contents

     Our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, gross and net of ceded reinsurance were as follows:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Gross
               
Case reserves
  $ 95,135     $ 91,057  
IBNR and ULAE reserves
    305,017       281,664  
 
           
Total reserves
  $ 400,152     $ 372,721  
 
           
 
               
Net of reinsurance
               
Case reserves
  $ 64,259     $ 62,497  
IBNR and ULAE reserves
    196,950       181,672  
 
           
Total
  $    261,209     $ 244,169  
 
           
     Revenue Recognition
     Premiums. Premiums are recognized as earned using the daily pro rata method over the terms of the policies. When premium rates change, the effect of those changes will not immediately affect earned premium. Rather, those changes will be recognized ratably over the period of coverage. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that relate to the unexpired terms of policies-in-force. As policies expire, we audit those policies comparing the estimated premium rating units that were used to set the initial premium to the actual premiums rating units for the period and adjust the premiums accordingly. Premium adjustments identified as a result of these audits are recognized as earned when identified.
     Commissions and Fees. Wholesale agency commissions and fee income from unaffiliated companies are earned at the effective date of the related insurance policies produced or as services are provided under the terms of the administrative and service provider contracts. Related commissions to retail agencies are concurrently expensed at the effective date of the related insurance policies produced. Profit sharing commissions due from certain insurance companies, based on losses and loss adjustment expense experience, are earned when determined and communicated by the applicable insurance company.
     Investments
     Our marketable investment securities, including money market accounts held in our investment portfolio, are classified as available-for-sale and, as a result, are reported at market value. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which resulted in no material changes in valuation techniques we previously used to measure fair values. See Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete description. A decline in the market value of any security below cost that is deemed other than temporary is charged to earnings and results in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security. In most cases, declines in market value that are deemed temporary are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of the related taxes, until realized. The exception to this rule relates to investments in convertible securities with embedded derivatives and our alternative investments. Convertible securities were accounted for under FASB Statement No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 155”) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Alternative investments consist of our investments in limited partnerships, which invest in high yield convertible securities and distressed structured finance products. These alternative investments are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”), for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
     Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related debt security as an adjustment to yield using the effective-interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.
     Impairment of Investment Securities
     Impairment of investment securities results in a charge to operations when a market decline below cost is other-than-temporary. Management regularly reviews our fixed maturity securities portfolio to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. Factors considered in evaluating potential impairment include, but are not limited to, the current fair value as compared to cost or amortized cost of the security, as appropriate, the length of time the

22


Table of Contents

investment has been below cost or amortized cost and by how much, our intent and ability to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value, specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions. Other-than-temporary impairment losses result in a permanent reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. Significant changes in the factors we consider when evaluating investments for impairment losses could result in a significant change in impairment losses reported in the consolidated financial statements.
     As mentioned above, the Company considers its intent and ability to hold a security until the value recovers as part of the process of evaluating whether a security’s unrealized loss represents an other-than-temporary decline. The Company’s ability to hold such securities is supported by sufficient cash flow from its operations and from maturities within its investment portfolio in order to meet its claims payment and other disbursement obligations arising from its underwriting operations without selling such investments. With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the security’s value is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, changing information and market conditions. Management of the Company’s investment portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers, which is directed and monitored by the investment committee. While these investment managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based upon a change in market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the Company’s portfolio as available-for-sale.
     Investment managers are required to notify management of rating agency downgrades of securities in their portfolios as well as any potential investment valuation issues no later than the end of each quarter. Investment managers are also required to notify management, and receive prior approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may result in a realized loss above a certain threshold. Additionally, investment managers are required to notify management, and receive approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may result in any realized loss up until a certain period beyond the close of a quarterly accounting period.
     Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
     Policy acquisition costs related to direct and assumed premiums consist of commissions, underwriting, policy issuance, and other costs that vary with and are primarily related to the production of new and renewal business, and are deferred, subject to ultimate recoverability, and expensed over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Investment income is included in the calculation of ultimate recoverability.
     Goodwill and Intangible Assets
     In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and intangible assets that are not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test for goodwill shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit to which it is assigned. The impairment test for intangible assets shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with their carrying amounts. If the carrying amount of the goodwill or intangible assets exceed their fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
     In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,” the carrying value of long-lived assets, including amortizable intangibles and property and equipment, are evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred relative to a given asset or assets. Impairment is deemed to have occurred if projected undiscounted cash flows associated with an asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. The estimated cash flows include management’s assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of that asset in operations. The amount of the impairment loss recognized is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its then estimated fair value.

23


Table of Contents

     Results of Operations
     Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
     The following table summarizes our results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    March 31,        
    2009     2008     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
Operating Revenue
                       
Net earned premiums
  $ 52,594     $ 43,571       21 %
Commissions and fees
    6,894       4,053       70  
Net investment income
    6,434       4,848       33  
Net realized gains on investments
    1,757       1       N/M  
 
                 
Total Operating Revenues
    67,679       52,473       29  
 
                 
Operating Expenses
                       
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
    30,493       23,444       30  
Amortization of intangible assets
    575       399       44  
Other operating expenses
    22,552       14,197       59  
 
                 
Total Operating Expenses
    53,620       38,040       41  
 
                 
Operating Income
    14,059       14,433       (3 )
Interest Expense
    1,310       1,899       (31 )
 
                 
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
    12,749       12,534       2  
Income Taxes
    4,068       3,898       4  
 
                 
Income From Continuing Operations
    8,681       8,636       1 %
Income From Discontinued Operations,
Net of Income Taxes
          1,085       (100 )
 
                 
Net Income
  $ 8,681     $ 9,721       (11 )%
 
                 
Loss Ratio
    58.0 %     53.8 %   4.2 points  
Underwriting Expense Ratio
    30.4 %     21.2 %   9.2 points  
 
                 
Combined Ratio
    88.4 %     75.0 %   13.4 points  
 
                 

24


Table of Contents

     Operating Revenue
     Net Earned Premiums
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    March 31,        
    2009     2008     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
Written premiums
                       
Direct
  $ 73,120     $ 76,214       (4 )%
Assumed
    4,758       4,993       (5 )
Ceded
    (28,053 )     (22,704 )     24  
 
                 
Net written premiums
  $ 49,825     $ 58,503       (15 )%
 
                 
 
                       
Earned premiums
                       
Direct
  $ 73,304     $ 68,653       7 %
Assumed
    4,287       3,752       14  
Ceded
    (25,072 )     (27,679 )     (9 )
Earned but unbilled premiums
    75       (1,155 )     (106 )
 
                 
Net earned premiums
  $ 52,594     $ 43,571       21 %
 
                 
     Direct written premiums decreased $3.1 million, or 4%, primarily due to decreases in premium production from the Company’s Security and Specialty underwriting platforms offset somewhat by increases in production from the Company’s FM Emerald underwriting platform during the three months ended March 31, 2009. Direct earned premiums increased $4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009, or 7%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
     Assumed written premiums decreased $0.2 million, or 5%, and assumed earned premiums increased $0.5 million, or 14%. The decrease in assumed written premiums is primarily due to a decrease in production for the admitted legal liability business.
     Ceded written premiums increased $5.3 million, or 24%, and ceded earned premiums decreased $2.6 million, or 9%, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. Ceded written premiums increased to 36% of direct and assumed written premiums during the first quarter of 2009 compared to 28% of direct and assumed written premiums during the first quarter of 2008 principally due to purchasing more quota share reinsurance during the first quarter of 2009 for the Company’s primary casualty business compared to the first quarter of 2008. The increase in quota share cessions was offset somewhat by lower cessions under our excess of loss treaties during the first quarter of 2009 and the elimination of a 50% quota share on a contract underwriting class of business during the fourth quarter of 2008, which impacted the first quarter of 2009. Ceded earned premiums decreased primarily due to ceded written premiums continuing to be earned on the Company’s 2008 quota share reinsurance treaties.
     Earned but unbilled premiums increased $1.2 million, or 106%, primarily due to the net earned premiums subject to audit during the three months ended March 31, 2009 increasing compared to the net premiums earned subject to audit during the three months ended March 31, 2008.

25


Table of Contents

     Commissions and Fees
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    March 31,        
    2009     2008     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
Insurance underwriting commissions and fees
  $ 1,357     $ 1,329       2 %
Insurance services commissions and fees
    5,537       2,724       103  
 
                 
Total commissions and fees
  $ 6,894     $ 4,053       70 %
 
                 
     Insurance underwriting commissions and fees were flat from the three months ended March 31, 2008 to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Insurance services commissions and fees, which were principally AMC income and not related to gross written premiums, increased $2.8 million, as the result of three months of commission and fee income during the first quarter of 2009 for AMC compared to two months during the first quarter of 2008.
     Net Investment Income and Realized Gains on Investments. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, net investment income was $6.4 million, a $1.6 million, or 33%, increase from $4.9 million reported for the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily due to the increase in invested assets over the period. At March 31, 2009, invested assets were $591.5 million, a $117.6 million, or 25%, increase over $473.9 million of invested assets at March 31, 2008. This increase was due to increases in net written premiums, from the cash retained on our quota share reinsurance contracts on a “funds withheld” basis, and the proceeds from the sale of ARPCO. The annualized investment yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.6% and 4.0% at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 5.2% and 4.8% at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2009, net realized gains were $1.8 million compared to the net realized gains of $1,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. The first quarter 2009 net realized gains were principally due to the mark to market increase in securities carried at market in accordance with SFAS 155 and SFAS 159 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 of approximately $2.3 million, offset somewhat by losses on the sale of certain securities.
     Operating Expenses
     Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred increased $7.0 million, or 30%, in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to the increase in net earned exposures reflected in the 21% increase in net earned premiums, and an increase in the accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio from decreased premium rates. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 included approximately $0.8 million of favorable development of December 31, 2008 prior years’ loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. There was no development of December 31, 2007 prior years’ loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
     Other Operating Expenses
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    March 31,        
    2009     2008     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
  $ 13,329     $ 8,213       62 %
Ceded reinsurance commissions
    (10,140 )     (8,483 )     20  
Other underwriting and operating expenses
    19,363       14,467       34  
 
                 
Other operating expenses
  $ 22,552     $ 14,197       59 %
 
                 
     During the three months ended March 31, 2009, other operating expenses increased $8.4 million, or 59%, from the three months ended March 31, 2008. Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses increased by $5.1 million, or 62% due to the impact of purchasing less quota share reinsurance and increased acquisition expenses on new underwriting initiatives. Ceded reinsurance commissions increased $1.7 million, or 20%, principally due to the effect of purchasing more quota share reinsurance during the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008, offset by lower ceding commissions related to profit sharing on ceded written premiums. Other underwriting and operating expenses, which consist of commissions, other acquisition costs, and general and

26


Table of Contents

underwriting expenses, net of acquisition cost deferrals, increased by $4.9 million, or 34%. The increase was principally due to an increase of $3.8 million in commissions and other acquisition costs, net of deferrals of net acquisition costs, an increase of $1.9 million in general and underwriting expenses related to our insurance services operations principally due to having three months of AMC results compared to two months during the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to the closing of the AMC acquisition on February 1, 2008, and a decrease in corporate expenses of $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
     Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased 31% from the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.5 million decrease in the change in fair value of the interest rate swap on junior subordinated debentures as discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
     Income Taxes. Our effective tax rates were approximately 31.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 31.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses, and the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest.
     Discontinued Operations. On June 27, 2008, the Company sold all of the outstanding capital stock of American Risk Pooling Consultants, Inc. (“ARPCO”). The results of ARPCO’s operations are presented as Discontinued Operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, income from discontinued operations consisted principally of ARPCO’s operating income, net of taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     Sources and Uses of Funds
     FMFC. FMFC is a holding company with all of its operations being conducted by its subsidiaries. Accordingly, FMFC has continuing cash needs for primarily administrative expenses, debt service and taxes. Funds to meet these obligations come primarily from management and administrative fees from all of our subsidiaries, and dividends from our non-insurance subsidiaries.
     Insurance Subsidiaries. The primary sources of our insurance subsidiaries’ cash are net written premiums, claims handling fees, amounts earned from investments and the sale or maturity of invested assets. Additionally, FMFC has in the past and may in the future contribute capital to its insurance subsidiaries.
     The primary uses of our insurance subsidiaries’ cash include the payment of claims and related adjustment expenses, underwriting fees and commissions and taxes and making investments. Because the payment of individual claims cannot be predicted with certainty, our insurance subsidiaries rely on our paid claims history and industry data in determining the expected payout of claims and estimated loss reserves. To the extent that FMIC, FMCC, and AUIC have an unanticipated shortfall in cash, they may either liquidate securities held in their investment portfolios or obtain capital from FMFC. However, given the cash generated by our insurance subsidiaries’ operations and the relatively short duration of their investment portfolios, we do not currently foresee any such shortfall.
     Non-insurance Subsidiaries. The primary sources of our non-insurance subsidiaries’ cash are commissions and fees, policy fees, administrative fees and claims handling and loss control fees. The primary uses of our non-insurance subsidiaries’ cash are commissions paid to brokers, operating expenses, taxes and dividends paid to FMFC. There are generally no restrictions on the payment of dividends by our non-insurance subsidiaries, except as may be set forth in our borrowing arrangements.

27


Table of Contents

Cash Flows
     Our sources of funds have consisted primarily of net written premiums, commissions and fees, investment income and proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and debt. We use operating cash primarily to pay operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses and for purchasing investments. A summary of our cash flows is as follows:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
               
Operating activities — continuing operations
  $ 26,082     $ 25,139  
Operating activities — discontinued operations
          1,023  
Investing activities
    (43,329 )     (23,780 )
Financing activities
          22  
 
           
Change in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (17,247 )   $ 2,404  
 
           
     Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was primarily from cash received on net written premiums and less cash disbursed for operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses. Cash received from net written premiums for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were retained on a “funds withheld” basis in accordance with the quota share reinsurance contracts.
     Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily from cash received on commissions and service fees less cash disbursed for operating expenses.
     Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily resulted from our net investment in short-term, debt and equity securities. The $19.5 million increase in net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily due to timing related to the redemption of short-term investments.
     Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 resulted from the issuance of common stock as a result of the exercise of stock options.
     Based on historical trends, market conditions, and our business plans, we believe that our existing resources and sources of funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs in the next twelve months. Because economic, market and regulatory conditions may change, however, there can be no assurances that our funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. In addition, competition, pricing, the frequency and severity of losses, and interest rates could significantly affect our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
     Long-term debt
     Junior Subordinated Debentures. We have $67.0 million cumulative principal amount of floating rate junior subordinated debentures outstanding. The debentures were issued in connection with the issuance of trust preferred stock by our wholly-owned, non-consolidated trusts. Cumulative interest on $46.4 million cumulative principal amount of the debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a variable annual rate, reset quarterly, equal to the three month LIBOR plus 3.75% for $8.2 million, the three month LIBOR plus 4.00% for $12.4 million, and the three month LIBOR plus 3.0% for $25.8 million principal amount of the debentures. Cumulative interest on $20.6 million of the cumulative principal amount of the debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a fixed annual rate of 8.25% through December 15, 2012, and a variable annual rate, reset quarterly, equal to the three month LIBOR plus 3.30% thereafter. For our floating rate junior subordinated debentures, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to pay a fixed rate of interest. See “Derivative Financial Instruments” for further discussion. At March 31, 2009, the three month LIBOR rate was 1.19%. We may defer the payment of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods; however, no such deferral has been made.
     Credit Facility. In October 2006, we entered into a credit facility which provided for borrowings of up to $30.0 million. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at our election as follows: (i) at a rate per annum equal to the greater of the lender’s prime rate and the federal funds rate less 0.5%, each minus 0.75%; or, (ii) a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin

28


Table of Contents

which is currently 0.75% or 1.0% based on our leverage ratio. The obligations under the credit facility are guaranteed by our material non-insurance subsidiaries. The maturity date of borrowings made under the credit facility is September 2011. The credit facility contains covenants which, among other things, restrict our ability to incur indebtedness, grant liens, make investments and sell assets. The credit facility also has certain financial covenants. At March 31, 2009, there were no borrowings under the agreement. We are not required to comply with the financial-related covenants until we borrow under the credit facility. However, at March 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants related to the credit facility.
     Derivative Financial Instruments. Financial derivatives are used as part of the overall asset and liability risk management process. We use interest rate swap agreements with a combined notional amount of $45.0 million in order to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations with respect to our junior subordinated debentures. Under two of our swap agreements, which expire in August 2009, we pay interest at a fixed rate of 4.12%; under our other swap agreement, which expires in December 2011, we pay interest at a fixed rate of 5.013%. Under all three swap agreements, we receive interest at the three month LIBOR, which is equal to the contractual rate under the junior subordinated debentures. At March 31, 2009, we had no exposure to credit loss on the interest rate swap agreements.
     Cash and Invested Assets
     Our cash and invested assets consist of fixed maturity securities, convertible securities, equity securities, and cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2009, our investments had a market value of $591.5 million and consisted of the following investments:
                 
    March 31, 2009  
    Market Value     % of Portfolio  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Short Term Investments
  $ 38,537       6.5 %
U.S. Treasuries
    5,293       0.9 %
U.S. Agencies
    3,210       0.5 %
Municipal Bonds
    212,024       35.9 %
Corporate Bonds
    93,727       15.8 %
High Yield Bonds
    15,344       2.6 %
MBS Passthroughs
    53,540       9.1 %
CMOs
    41,551       7.0 %
Asset Backed Securities
    21,472       3.6 %
Commercial MBS
    37,124       6.3 %
Convertible Securities
    51,172       8.7 %
High Yield Convertible Fund
    7,899       1.3 %
Structured Finance Fund
    9,831       1.7 %
Preferred Stocks
    798       0.1 %
Common Stocks
          0.0 %
 
           
Total
  $ 591,522       100.0 %
 
           
     The following table shows the composition of the investment portfolio by remaining time to maturity at March 31, 2009. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Additionally, the expected maturities of our investments in putable bonds fluctuate inversely with interest rates and therefore may also differ from contractual maturities.

29


Table of Contents

         
    % of Total
Average Life   Investment
Less than one year
    21.0 %
One to two years
    15.9 %
Two to three years
    13.9 %
Three to four years
    14.0 %
Four to five years
    12.5 %
Five to seven years
    8.5 %
More than seven years
    14.2 %
 
       
Total
    100.0 %
 
       
     The effective duration of the portfolio as of March 31, 2009 is approximately 3.0 years and the taxable equivalent duration is 2.6 years. Excluding cash and cash equivalents, equity and convertible securities, the portfolio duration and taxable equivalent duration are 3.3 years and 2.9 years, respectively. The shorter taxable equivalent duration reflects the significant portion of the portfolio in municipal securities. The annualized investment yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.6% at March 31, 2009 and 4.0% at March 31, 2008. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 5.2% at March 31, 2009 and 4.8% at March 31, 2008.
     The majority of our portfolio consists of AAA or AA rated securities with a Standard and Poor’s weighted average credit quality of AA- at March 31, 2009. The fixed income portfolio had a weighted average credit quality of AA at March 31, 2009. The majority of the investments rated BBB and below are convertible securities. Consistent with our investment policy, we review any security if it falls below BBB- and assess whether it should be held or sold. The following table shows the ratings distribution of our investment portfolio as of March 31, 2009 as a percentage of total market value.
         
    % of Total
S&P Rating   Investments
AAA
    50.5 %
AA
    20.4 %
A
    12.9 %
BBB
    7.8 %
BB
    4.7 %
B
    1.9 %
CCC
    0.1 %
NR
    1.7 %
 
       
Total
    100.0 %
 
       
     Within Mortgages, the Company invests in residential collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) that typically have high credit quality and are expected to provide an advantage in yield compared to U.S. Treasury securities. The Company’s investment strategy is to purchase CMO tranches which offer the most favorable return given the risks involved. One significant risk evaluated is prepayment sensitivity. While prepayment risk (either shortening or lengthening of duration) and its effect on total return cannot be fully controlled, particularly when interest rates move dramatically, the investment process generally favors securities that control this risk within expected interest rate ranges. The Company does not purchase residual interests in CMO’s.
     At March 31, 2009, the Company held CMO’s classified as available-for-sale with a fair value of $41.6 million. Approximately 76.9% of those CMO holdings were guaranteed by or fully collateralized by securities issued by a full faith and credit agency such as GNMA, or government sponsored enterprises (“GSE”) such as FNMA or FHLMC. In addition, at March 31, 2009, the Company held $52.7 million of mortgage-backed pass-through securities issued by one of the GSE’s and classified as available-for-sale.
     The Company held commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) of $37.1 million, of which 86.6% are pre-2006 vintage, at March 31, 2009. The weighted average credit support (adjusted for defeasance) of our CMBS portfolio was 39.7% and comprised mainly of super senior structures. The average loan to value at origination was 67.6%. The average credit rating of these securities was AAA. The CMBS portfolio was supported by loans that were diversified across economic sectors and geographical areas. It is not believed that this portfolio exposes the Company to a material adverse impact on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity, due to the underlying credit strength of these securities.

30


Table of Contents

     The Company’s fixed maturity investment portfolio included asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations collateralized by sub-prime mortgages and alternative documentation mortgages (“Alt-A”) with market values of $0.1 million and $1.4 million at March 31, 2009, respectively. The Company defines sub-prime mortgage-backed securities as investments with weighted average FICO scores below 650. Alt-A securities are defined by above-prime interest rates, high loan-to-value ratios, high debt-to-income ratios, low loan documentation (e.g., limited or no verification of income and assets), or other characteristics that are inconsistent with conventional underwriting standards employed by government-sponsored mortgage entities. The average credit rating on these securities and obligations held by the Company at March 31, 2009 was BBB-.
     The Company’s fixed maturity investment portfolio at March 31, 2009 included securities issued by numerous municipalities with a total carrying value of $212.0 million. Approximately $31.6 million, or 14.9%, were pre-refunded (escrowed with Treasuries). Approximately $105.2 million, or 49.6%, of the securities were enhanced by third-party insurance for the payment of principal and interest in the event of an issuer default. Such insurance, prior to the downgrades of many of the monolines, results in a rating of AAA being assigned by independent rating agencies to those securities. The downgrade of credit ratings of insurers of these securities could result in a corresponding downgrade in the ratings of the securities from AAA to the underlying rating of the respective security without giving effect to the benefit of insurance. Of the total $105.2 million of insured municipal securities in the Company’s investment portfolio at March 31, 2009, 99.0% were rated at A- or above, and approximately 78.1% were rated AA- or above, without the benefit of insurance. The average underlying credit rating of the entire municipal bond portfolio was AA at March 31, 2009. The Company believes that a loss of the benefit of insurance would not result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity, due to the underlying credit strength of the issuers of the securities, as well as the Company’s ability and intent to hold the securities.
     The Company’s investment portfolio does not contain any exposure to Collateralized Debt Obligations (“CDO”) or investments collateralized by CDOs. In addition, the Company’s investment portfolio does not contain any exposure to auction-rate securities.
     Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash on hand of $14.6 million at March 31, 2009.
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable investment securities classified as available-for-sale at March 31, 2009 by major security type were as follows:
                                 
            Gross Unrealized     Estimated  
    Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Market Value  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $ 5,039     $ 254     $     $ 5,293  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    81,037       3,643       (12 )     84,668  
Government agency obligations
    3,145       65             3,210  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    74,406       929       (6,316 )     69,019  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    204,477       8,107       (560 )     212,024  
Corporate bonds
    111,061       2,672       (4,662 )     109,071  
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    479,165       15,670       (11,550 )     483,285  
Preferred stocks
    1,416             (618 )     798  
Short-term investments
    38,537                   38,537  
 
                       
Total
  $ 519,118     $ 15,670     $ (12,168 )   $ 522,620  
 
                       
     At March 31, 2009 the total unrealized loss of all impaired securities totaled $12.2 million. This represents approximately 2.1% of quarter end invested assets of $591.5 million. This unrealized loss position is a function of the purchase of specific securities in a lower interest rate or spread environment than what prevails as of March 31, 2009. Some of these losses are due to the increase in spreads of select corporate bonds or structured securities. We have viewed these market value declines as being temporary in nature. Our portfolio is relatively short as the duration of the core fixed income portfolio excluding cash, convertible securities, limited partnerships and equity is approximately 3.3 years. We expect to hold the majority of these temporarily impaired securities until maturity in the event that interest rates do not decline from current levels. In light of our significant growth over the past 24 months, liquidity needs from the portfolio are minimal. As a result, we would not expect to have to liquidate temporarily impaired securities to pay claims or for any other purposes. There have been certain instances over the past year, where due to market based opportunities; we have elected to sell a small portion of the portfolio. These situations were unique and infrequent occurrences and in our opinion, do not reflect an indication that we do not have the intent and ability to hold these securities until they mature or recover in value.

31


Table of Contents

     The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the time period the investment had been in an unrealized loss position is as follows at March 31, 2009:
                                 
    Less than 12 Months     Greater than 12 Months  
    Fair Value             Fair Value        
    of             of        
    Investments             Investments        
    With     Gross     With     Gross  
    Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized  
    Losses     Losses     Losses     Losses  
        (Dollars in thousands)      
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $     $     $     $  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
                       
Government agency obligations
                       
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    22,235       (1,507 )     17,818       (4,821 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    7,005       (301 )     8,274       (259 )
Corporate bonds
    34,734       (2,470 )     13,284       (2,192 )
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    63,974       (4,278 )     39,376       (7,272 )
Preferred Stocks
    642       (267 )     155       (351 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 64,616     $ (4,545 )   $ 39,531     $ (7,623 )
 
                       
     Below is a table that illustrates the unrecognized impairment loss by sector. The increase in spread relative to U.S. Treasury Bonds was the primary factor leading to impairment for the year ended March 31, 2009. All asset sectors were affected by the overall increase in spreads as can be seen from the table below. In addition to the general level of rates, we also look at a variety of other factors such as direction of credit spreads for an individual issue as well as the magnitude of specific securities that have declined below amortized cost.
         
    Amount of  
    Unrealized Loss  
Sector   at March 31, 2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Short Term Investments
  $  
U.S. Treasuries
     
U.S. Agencies
     
Municipal Bonds
    (560 )
Corporate Bonds
    (4,231 )
High Yield Bonds
    (431 )
MBS Passthroughs
    (47 )
CMOs
    (1,575 )
Asset Backed Securities
    (571 )
Commercial MBS
    (4,135 )
Convertible Securities
     
High Yield Convertible Fund
     
Structured Finance Fund
     
Preferred Stocks
    (618 )
Common Stocks
     
 
     
 
  $ (12,168 )
 
     
     The most significant risk or uncertainty inherent in our assessment methodology is that the current credit rating of a particular issue changes over time. If the rating agencies should change their rating on a particular security in our portfolio, it could lead to a reclassification of that specific issue. The vast majority of our unrecognized impairment losses are investment grade and “AAA” or “AA” rated securities. Should the credit quality of individual issues decline for whatever reason then it would lead us to reconsider the classification of that particular security. Within the non-investment grade sector, we continue to monitor the particular status of each issue. Should prospects for any one issue deteriorate, we would potentially alter our classification of that particular issue.

32


Table of Contents

     The table below illustrates the breakdown of impaired securities by investment grade and non investment grade as well as the duration that these sectors have been trading below amortized cost. The average duration of the impairment has been greater than 12 months. The unrealized loss of impaired securities as a percent of the amortized cost of those securities is 10.5% as of March 31, 2009.
                                         
    % of Total     Total     Total     Average Unrealized Loss     % of Loss  
    Amortized Cost     Amortized Cost     Unrealized Losses     as % of Amortized Cost     > 12 Months  
            (Dollars in thousands)                  
Non Investment Grade
    4.5 %   $ 5,273     $ 652       12.4 %     41.6 %
Investment Grade
    95.5       111,044       11,516       10.4       63.8  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total
    100.0 %   $ 116,317     $ 12,168       10.5 %     62.6 %
 
                             
     The majority of these securities are “AAA” or “AA” rated. These issues are continually monitored and may be classified in the future as being other than temporarily impaired.
     The largest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is Corporate Bonds at approximately 34.8% of the total loss. Within Corporate Bonds 98.7% are rated investment grade BBB or better, and their temporary impairment results primarily from the widening of credit spreads. The next highest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is Commercial MBS at 34.0% of the total loss. These securities are all AAA rated and have been affected primarily by the widening of spreads within this sector and/or the general level of interest rates. The next highest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is CMOs at 13.0% of the total loss. Within CMOs 98.7% are rated AAA including the 76.9% of the CMO exposure that is agency issued, and have primarily been affected by the general level of interest rates as well.
     For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we sold approximately $8.0 million of market value of fixed income securities excluding convertibles, which were trading below amortized cost while recording a realized loss of $0.7 million. This loss represented 7.9% of the amortized cost of the positions. These sales were unique opportunities to sell specific positions due to changing market conditions. These situations were exceptions to our general assertion regarding our ability and intent to hold securities with unrealized losses until they mature or recover in value. This position is further supported by the insignificant losses as a percentage of amortized cost for the respective periods.
     During the three months ended March 31, 2009 net realized gains on investments were $1.8 million compared to net realized gains of $1,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Net realized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were principally due to mark to market increases in securities carried at market in accordance with SFAS 155 and SFAS 159 of approximately $2.3 million, offset somewhat by losses on the sale of certain securities.
     Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
     We defer a portion of the costs of acquiring insurance business, primarily commissions and certain policy underwriting and issuance costs, which vary with and are primarily related to the production of insurance business. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, $13.1 million of the costs were deferred. Deferred policy acquisition costs totaled $27.1 million, or 28.2% of unearned premiums (net of reinsurance), at March 31, 2009.

33


Table of Contents

     Reinsurance
     The following table illustrates our direct written premiums and premiums ceded for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Direct written premiums
  $ 73,120     $ 76,214  
Ceded written premiums
    28,053       22,704  
 
           
Net written premiums
  $ 45,067     $ 53,510  
 
           
Ceded written premiums as percentage of direct written premiums
    38.4 %     29.8 %
 
           
     The following table illustrates the effect of our reinsurance ceded strategies on our results of operations:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Ceded written premiums
  $ 28,053     $ 22,704  
Ceded premiums earned
    25,072       27,679  
Losses and loss adjustment expenses ceded
    17,608       14,893  
Ceding commissions
    6,666       10,866  
     Our net cash flows relating to ceded reinsurance activities (premiums paid less losses recovered and ceding commissions received) were approximately $8.3 million net cash paid for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to net cash paid of $10.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
     The assuming reinsurer is obligated to indemnify the ceding company to the extent of the coverage ceded. The inability to recover amounts due from reinsurers could result in significant losses to us. To protect us from reinsurance recoverable losses, FMIC seeks to enter into reinsurance agreements with financially strong reinsurers. Our senior executives evaluate the credit risk of each reinsurer before entering into a contract and monitor the financial strength of the reinsurer. On March 31, 2009, substantially all reinsurance contracts to which we were a party were with companies with A.M. Best ratings of “A” or better. One reinsurance contract to which we were a party was with a reinsurer that does not carry an A.M. Best rating. For this contract, we required full collateralization of our recoverable via a grantor trust and an irrevocable letter of credit. In addition, ceded reinsurance contracts contain trigger clauses through which FMIC can initiate cancellation including immediate return of all ceded unearned premiums at its option, or which result in immediate collateralization of ceded reserves by the assuming company in the event of a financial strength rating downgrade, thus limiting credit exposure. On March 31, 2009, there was no allowance for uncollectible reinsurance, as all reinsurance balances were current and there were no disputes with reinsurers.
     On March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, FMFC had a net amount of recoverables from reinsurers of $198.7 million and $181.2 million, respectively, on a consolidated basis.
     Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP FAS 115-2”). FSP FAS 115-2 modifies the existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance to require the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment when an entity has the intent to sell a debt security or when it is more likely than not an entity will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. Additionally, FSP FAS 115-2 changes the presentation and amount of other-than-temporary losses recognized in the income statement for instances when the Company determines that there is a credit loss on a debt security but it is more likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to the anticipated recovery of its remaining cost basis. For these debt securities, the amount representing the credit loss will be reported as an impairment loss in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income and the amount related to all other factors will be

34


Table of Contents

reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. FSP FAS 115-2 also requires the presentation of other-than-temporary impairments separately from realized gains and losses on the face of the income statement. In addition to the changes in measurement and presentation, FSP FAS 115-2 is intended to enhance the existing disclosure requirements for other-than-temporary impairments and requires all disclosures related to other-than-temporary impairments in both interim and annual periods. The provisions of FSP FAS 115-2 are effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to early adopt FSP FAS 115-2/124-2 effective March 31, 2009 as this standard would have no material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”). Under FSP FAS 157-4, if an entity determines that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or the liability in relation to the normal market activity for the asset or liability (or similar assets or liabilities), then transactions or quoted prices may not accurately reflect fair value. In addition, if there is evidence that the transaction for the asset or liability is not orderly; the entity shall place little, if any weight on that transaction price as an indicator of fair value. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to adopt FSP FAS 157-4 effective March 31, 2009 as this standard would not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
     In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We did not elect to adopt FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 effective March 31, 2009.
     We adopted the following accounting standards in the first quarter 2009, none of which had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity:
    SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations;”
 
    SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51;”
 
    SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;”
 
    FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities;” and
 
    FSP FAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.”
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     Refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a complete discussion of the Company’s market risk. There have been no material changes to the market risk information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding financial disclosures. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

35


Table of Contents

PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
     See Index of Exhibits following the signature page, which is incorporated herein by reference.

36


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
             
    FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION    
 
           
 
  By:   /s/ RICHARD H. SMITH
 
Richard H. Smith
   
 
      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer    
 
           
 
  By:   /s/ JOHN A. MARAZZA
 
John A. Marazza
   
 
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    
 
           
 
  Date:   May 7, 2009    

37


Table of Contents

INDEX OF EXHIBITS
             
Exhibit        
Number   Note   Description
 
           
31 (a)
    (1 )   Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
           
31 (b)
    (1 )   Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
           
32 (a)
    (1 )   Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
           
32 (b)
    (1 )   Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
(1)   - Filed herewith

38