Hersha Hospitality 10-KA 12-31-2004
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
______________________
FORM
10-K/A
Amendment
No. 1
FOR
ANNUAL AND TRANSITIONAL
REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark
One)
|
x |
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
OR
|
o |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the
transition period from to
Commission
file number:
001-14765
HERSHA
HOSPITALITY TRUST
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
Maryland
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization) |
|
251811499
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.) |
|
|
148
Sheraton Drive, Box A, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania
(Address
of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) |
|
17070
(Zip
Code) |
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:
(717) 770-2405
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each
class |
Name of each
exchange on which registered |
Class
A Common Shares of Beneficial Interest,
par
value $.01 per share |
American
Stock Exchange |
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of
class)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No o
The
aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2004, was approximately $161.9
million.
As of
March 14, 2005, the number of outstanding Class A common shares of beneficial
interest outstanding was 20,292,631.
Documents
Incorporated By Reference: None.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
This
Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A is being filed to amend and restate Item 9A
hereof to provide management’s
annual report on internal control over financial reporting required by Item
308(a) of Regulation S-K and the related attestation
report of the independent registered public accounting firm, as
required by Item 308(b) of Regulation S-K. Securities and Exchange Commission
Release No. 34-50754, provides up to 45 additional days beyond the due date of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the filing of management’s annual
report on internal control over financial reporting and the related attestation
report of the independent registered public accounting firm. Pursuant to such
release, management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and
the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, are contained
herein.
PART
II
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) |
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures |
The
Company’s management, under the supervision of and with the participation of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term
is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by
this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective and reasonably
designed to ensure that all material information relating to the Company
required to be included in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange
Commission due to the material weaknesses described below.
(b) |
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting |
The
Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting
refers to the processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and includes policies and procedures that:
|
· |
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; |
|
· |
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and |
|
· |
provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal control can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within the Company have been detected.
A
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a significant
deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more
than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected
Management,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting based on the criteria contained in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.
Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that, as of December 31,
2004, the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting because of the following material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting:
|
· |
The
Company identified three material weaknesses associated with internal
control activities in its interim and annual financial reporting
processes. First, the Company lacks appropriately designed controls over
account reconciliations and account analysis preparation. Second, the
Company lacks appropriately designed controls over the review of recurring
journal entries. Third, the Company did not maintain sufficient levels of
appropriately qualified personnel in its financial reporting processes. As
a result, Company personnel did not consistently follow established
internal control over financial reporting procedures related to (a) the
timely preparation of comprehensive documentation supporting management’s
analysis of the accounting treatment for non-routine and complex
transactions and (b) the review of such documentation by internal staff or
outside advisors to determine its completeness and the propriety of
conclusions. As a result of the aforementioned material weaknesses in the
Company’s financial reporting process, accounting errors, which were
evaluated to be material misstatements in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin 99, occurred requiring restatement of the Company’s previously
reported interim financial information as of and for the periods
ending March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004. Note 14
to the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the
restatements required to correct these errors in
accounting. |
|
· |
The
Company’s internal control activities designed to ensure completeness and
accuracy of payroll expense did not operate effectively as of December 31,
2004. Failure of these internal control activities could have resulted in
the material misstatement of amounts reported for payroll expenses. A
control was designed to compare the payroll costs as calculated by the
third party who administers the Company’s payroll to estimated payroll
expense developed from daily employee time and rate data by hotel
management. The control was designed effectively but not consistently
performed at all hotel properties. |
|
· |
The
Company’s internal control activities designed to ensure the existence and
accuracy of reported revenue did not operate effectively as of December
31, 2004. Failure of these internal control activities could have resulted
in the material misstatement of amounts reported for revenue. A control
was designed to reconcile revenue per the hotel reservation system of the
relevant hotel chain used in recording revenue in the financial statements
to rooms occupied and charges applied data for each hotel. The control was
designed effectively but not consistently performed at all hotel
properties |
Management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears
herein.
(c) |
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting |
There was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended December 31, 2004, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
In
response to the material weaknesses described above, subsequent to December 31,
2004, the Company has taken, and intends to take further, remedial measures in
response to these identified material weaknesses. To date, those remedial
measures include the following:
|
· |
The
Company is seeking to hire additional senior accounting professionals,
including a Chief Accounting Officer whose responsibilities were
previously performed by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. The
Company also has established additional procedures to more thoroughly
prepare and review its financial statements prior to release of financial
information. |
|
· |
The
Company has changed third party payroll service providers, and the new
provider is able to provide a report known as a Type II SAS 70 Report,
which evaluates and tests design and operating effectiveness of certain
internal controls allowing management to better evaluate the controls over
the payroll process. |
|
· |
The
Company is taking steps to better inform and train hotel level accounting
employees of its management company regarding the internal control
activities associated with revenue
accounting. |
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The
Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Hersha
Hospitality Trust:
We have
audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control (Item 9A(b)), that Hersha Hospitality
Trust (the Company) did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of material weaknesses
identified in management’s assessment based on criteria established in
Internal
Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Hersha
Hospitality Trust’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A
material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material
misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included
in management's assessment:
The
Company identified three material weaknesses associated with internal control
activities in its interim and annual financial reporting processes. First, the
Company lacks appropriately designed controls over account reconciliations and
account analysis preparation. Second, the Company lacks appropriately designed
controls over the review of recurring journal entries. Third, the Company did
not maintain sufficient levels of appropriately qualified personnel in its
financial reporting processes. As a result, Company personnel did not
consistently follow established internal control over financial reporting
procedures related to (a) the timely preparation of comprehensive documentation
supporting management’s analysis of the accounting treatment for non-routine and
complex transactions and (b) the review of such documentation by internal staff
or outside advisors to determine its completeness and the propriety of
conclusions. As a result of the aforementioned material weaknesses in the
Company’s financial reporting process, accounting errors, which were evaluated
to be material misstatements in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 99,
occurred requiring restatement of the Company’s previously reported interim
financial information as of and for the periods ending March 31, 2004,
June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004.
The
Company’s internal control activities designed to ensure completeness and
accuracy of payroll expense did not operate effectively as of December 31, 2004.
A control was designed to compare the payroll costs as calculated by the third
party who administers the Company’s payroll to estimated payroll expense
developed from daily employee time and rate data by hotel management. This
control was not consistently performed at all hotel properties. Failure of these
internal control activities could have resulted in the material misstatement of
amounts reported for payroll expenses.
The
Company’s internal control activities designed to ensure the existence and
accuracy of reported revenue did not operate effectively as of December 31,
2004. A control was designed to reconcile revenue per the hotel reservation
system of the relevant hotel chain used in recording revenue in the financial
statements to rooms occupied and charges applied data for each hotel. This
control was not consistently performed at all hotel properties. Failure of these
internal control activities could have resulted in the material misstatement of
amounts reported for revenue.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company
as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statement of operations,
shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the year then
ended. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature,
timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004 consolidated
financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 12,
2005 which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.
In our
opinion,
management's assessment that the Company did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on
criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses
described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria,
the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by COSO.
/s/
KPMG LLP
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
April 28, 2005
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
HERSHA HOSPITALITY
TRUST |
|
|
|
April 30, 2005 |
|
/s/ Hasu P. Shah |
|
Hasu P. Shah |
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer |
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE |
DATE |
/s/
Hasu P. Shah
Hasu P. Shah |
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) |
April
30, 2005 |
/s/ Thomas
S. Capello
Thomas
S. Capello |
Trustee |
April
30, 2005 |
John
M. Sabin |
Trustee |
April
30, 2005 |
/s/ Donald J. Landry
Donald J.
Landry |
Trustee |
April
30, 2005 |
William
Lehr, Jr. |
Trustee |
April
30, 2005 |
Michael
A. Leven |
Trustee |
April
30, 2005 |
K.D.
Patel |
Trustee |
April
30, 2005 |
/s/
Ashish R. Parikh
Ashish
R. Parikh |
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
April
30, 2005 |
/s/
David Desfor
David
Desfor |
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
April
30, 2005 |
List
of Exhibits
Unless
otherwise indicated, the exhibits listed below are incorporated by reference to
our Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 333-56087.
23.1 |
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
31.1 |
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
31.2 |
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
_____________________