UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
ý | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
o | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý | No fee required. | |||
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
SEC 1913 (11-01) | Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number. |
Penske Automotive Group 2015 Proxy Statement |
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. will be held May 5, 2015
2555 Telegraph Road
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
You are invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Penske Automotive Group, Inc. to be held at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time on May 5, 2015, at our corporate headquarters, 2555 Telegraph Rd., Bloomfield Hills, Michigan.
The agenda for this year's annual meeting includes the annual election of directors, approval of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, ratification of the selection of our independent auditing firm and an advisory vote regarding our executive officer compensation. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the director nominees, FOR approval of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, FOR the ratification of our independent auditors and FOR approval of our executive officer compensation. Please refer to the detailed information on each of these proposals and our annual meeting of stockholders in the accompanying materials.
We have elected to deliver our proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. This delivery process provides stockholders with the information they need, while at the same time conserving natural resources and lowering the cost of printing and delivery. On or about March 20, 2015, we will mail to our stockholders a notice of internet availability of proxy materials containing instructions on how to access our 2015 proxy statement and 2014 annual report to stockholders. This notice also provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes information on how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.
The annual meeting provides an excellent opportunity for stockholders to become better acquainted with the Company and its directors and officers, and I hope that you will attend. Whether or not you plan to attend, we ask that you cast your vote as soon as possible. This will assure your shares are represented at the meeting. Thank you for your continued support of Penske Automotive Group.
Sincerely, | ||
/s/ Roger S. Penske |
||
Roger S. Penske Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
||
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan March 11, 2015 |
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. |
Notice of 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date: | May 5, 2015 | |
Time: |
8:00 a.m. Eastern Time |
|
Place: |
2555 Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 |
|
Record date: |
March 10, 2015. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. |
|
Items of business: |
To elect twelve directors to serve until the next annual meeting Approval of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for 2015 To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers To transact other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting |
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the stockholder meeting to be held on May 5, 2015. Our Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.envisionreports.com/pag.
By order of the Board of Directors
/s/
Shane M. Spradlin
Shane M. Spradlin
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Bloomfield
Hills, Michigan
March 11, 2015
Proxy summary |
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date: | May 5, 2015 | |
Time: |
8:00 a.m. Eastern Time |
|
Place: |
2555 Telegraph Road Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 |
|
Record date: |
March 10, 2015 |
|
Voting: |
Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on. |
|
Admission to meeting: |
Proof of share ownership will be required to enter the Penske Automotive Annual Meeting see "Information about Attending the meeting" on page 44 for details. |
Meeting agenda
Voting matters and vote recommendation
Matter |
|
Board vote recommendation |
| Page Reference | ||||
Election of directors | For each director nominee | Page 5 | ||||||
Approval of the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan | | For | | Page 13 | ||||
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for 2015 |
For |
Page 19 |
||||||
Advisory vote on executive compensation | | For | | Page 22 |
Our director nominees |
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast.
Name |
|
Age |
|
Director since |
|
Occupation |
|
Independent |
| Committee Memberships | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
AC |
|
CC |
|
NCG |
| EC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
John D. Barr |
67 | 2002 | Chairman Papa Murphy's Holdings, Inc. |
· | F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael R. Eisenson |
| 59 | | 1993 | |
Managing Director & CEO Charlesbank Capital Partners |
| · | | C, F | | | | | | M | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
53 | 2006 | President, Penske Automotive Group | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William J. Lovejoy |
| 74 | | 2004 | |
General Manager Lovejoy & Associates |
| · | | | | M | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kimberly J. McWaters |
50 | 2004 | Chairman and CEO, Universal Technical Institute | · | M | C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lucio A. Noto |
| 76 | | 2001 | |
Retired Vice Chairman ExxonMobil Corporation |
| | | | | | | | | M | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greg Penske |
52 | 2014 | Chairman and CEO Penske Motor Group |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roger S. Penske |
| 78 | | 1999 | |
Chairman and CEO Penske Automotive Group |
| | | | | | | | | C | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sandra E. Pierce |
56 | 2012 | Vice-Chairman FirstMerit Corporation |
· | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kanji Sasaki |
| 45 | | 2014 | |
Sr. Vice President International Business Development Penske Automotive Group |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ronald G. Steinhart |
74 | 2001 | Retired Chairman and CEO Commercial Banking Group Bank One Corporation |
· | F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H. Brian Thompson |
| 75 | | 2002 | |
Executive Chairman GTT Communications, Inc. |
| · | | | | C | | M | | M |
AC | Audit Committee | C | Chair | |||
CC | Compensation and Management Development Committee | F | Financial expert | |||
NCG | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | M | Member | |||
EC | Executive Committee |
2015 Equity Incentive Plan |
In light of the expiration of the company's existing 2012 equity incentive plan later this year, our stockholders are being asked to approve a new 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. This plan provides up to 4.0 million shares for equity awards, including awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and terminates in 2020. In the last three years, we have granted a gross amount of 1,337,274 incentive equity awards, which represents an average annual rate of shares issued as compared to shares outstanding of approximately 0.5%.
Auditors |
As a matter of good corporate governance, we ask that our stockholders ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for 2015. Set forth below is summary information with respect to 2014 auditor fees.
|
|
Deloitte |
| KPMG | ||||
|
||||||||
Audit Fees |
$ | 1,320,500 | $ | 1,253,265 | ||||
Audit Related Fees |
188,500 | 46,175 | ||||||
Tax Fees |
| | ||||||
Tax Compliance |
128,359 | | ||||||
Other Tax Fees |
| 490,618 | | 23,000 | ||||
All Other Fees |
| 9,600 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total Fees |
$ | 2,127,977 | $ | 1,332,040 |
Executive Compensation |
We ask that our stockholders annually approve on an advisory basis our named executive officer compensation. The Board recommends a FOR vote because it believes that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving the Company's goals of rewarding sustained financial and operating performance and leadership excellence, aligning the executives' long-term interest with those of our stockholders and motivating the executives to remain with the Company for long and productive careers. In 2014, over 99% of the votes cast by our stockholders approved our 2013 executive compensation and there have not been significant changes to the elements of our executive compensation in 2014.
2014 Compensation Summary
Set forth below is the 2014 compensation for each named executive officer as determined under SEC rules.
Name and Principal Position |
|
Salary ($) |
|
Bonus ($) |
|
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
|
All Other Compensation ($) |
|
Total ($) |
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Roger S. Penske |
| 1,200,000 | | | | 3,600,000 | (2) | | 380,298 | (3) | | 5,180,298 | |||||
Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
| 700,000 | | | | 700,000 | (4) | | 128,649 | (5) | | 1,528,649 | |||||
President |
| | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
David K. Jones |
| 466,058 | | 235,000 | | 357,175 | | 69,483 | (6) | | 1,127,716 | ||||||
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Calvin C. Sharp |
| 459,327 | | 130,000 | | 153,860 | | 64,705 | (7) | | 807,892 | ||||||
Executive Vice President Human Resources |
| | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shane M. Spradlin |
| 474,327 | | 235,000 | | 322,720 | | 59,273 | (8) | | 1,091,320 | ||||||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Sec. |
| | | | |
Please see the footnote references beginning on page 32 for further information regarding our named executive officer compensation.
Proxy statement table of contents |
1
Q. What am I voting on?
A. | Proposal 1: | Election of twelve directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified | ||
Proposal 2: | Approval of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan | |||
Proposal 3: | Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditing firm for 2015 | |||
Proposal 4: | Advisory vote regarding executive compensation |
Q. Who can vote?
A. Our stockholders as of the close of business on the record date, March 10, 2015, can vote at the annual meeting. Each share of our common stock gets one vote. Votes may not be cumulated. As of March 10, 2015, there were 90,324,351 shares of our common stock outstanding.
Q. Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?
A. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials primarily over the Internet rather than mailing paper copies of those materials to each stockholder. On or about March 20, 2015, we will mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") to our stockholders, which provides website and other information for the purpose of accessing our proxy materials. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request a printed or electronic set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. We encourage you to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the cost and environmental impact of the annual meeting.
Q. How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?
A. The Notice provides you with instructions regarding how to view our proxy materials for the annual meeting on the Internet and instruct us to send proxy materials to you by email. Choosing to receive proxy materials by email will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of our annual meeting on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email message next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect unless and until you rescind it.
Q. What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?
A. Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, you are the stockholder of record with respect to those shares and we sent the Notice directly to you. If you request copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a proxy card.
Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name," and the Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct
2
that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. If you request copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form.
Q. How do I vote my shares?
A. If you are a stockholder of record or a participant in the Company's stock fund within our Company 401(k) plan (the "401(k) plan"), you may vote in any of the following ways:
By Internet. You may vote online by accessing www.envisionreports.com/pag and following the on-screen instructions. You will need the Control Number included on the Notice or on your proxy card, as applicable. You may vote online 24 hours a day. If you vote online, you do not need to return a proxy card.
By Telephone. In the U.S., you may vote by calling toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (1-800-652-8683) and following the instructions. You will need the Control Number included on the Notice or on your proxy card, as applicable. You may vote by telephone 24 hours a day. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card.
By Mail. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, you will receive a proxy card, and you may vote by signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the envelope provided. Votes submitted by mail must be received at our headquarters on or before May 4, 2015.
In Person. You may vote in person at the annual meeting by requesting a ballot from the inspector of election at the meeting.
A. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may vote in any of the following ways:
By Internet. You may vote online by following the instructions provided in the Notice. You will need the Control Number included on the Notice or on your voting instruction form, as applicable. You may vote online 24 hours a day. If you vote online, you do not need to return a voting instruction form.
By Telephone. You may vote by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice. You will need the Control Number included on the Notice or on your voting instruction form, as applicable. You may vote by telephone 24 hours a day. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a voting instruction form.
By Mail. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, you will receive a voting instruction form, and you may vote by signing, dating and mailing it in the envelope provided. Votes submitted by mail must be received at our headquarters on or before May 4, 2015.
In Person. You must obtain a legal proxy from the organization that holds your shares in order to vote your shares in person at the annual meeting. Follow the instructions on the Notice to obtain this legal proxy.
For both stockholders of record and beneficial owners of shares held in street name (other than stockholders within our Company 401(k) plan), online and telephone voting is available through 11:59 p.m. ET on Monday, May 4, 2015. For shares held by the stock fund within the Company's 401(k) plan, online and telephone voting is available through 11:59 p.m. ET on Friday, May 1, 2015.
Q. Can I change my mind after I vote?
A. You may change your vote at any time before the meeting by (1) signing and returning another proxy card with a later date (or voting through the Internet or telephone again), (2) voting at the meeting if you are a registered stockholder or have obtained a legal proxy from your bank or broker or (3) sending a notice to our Corporate Secretary prior to the meeting stating that you are revoking your proxy.
3
Q. What if I return my proxy card but do not provide voting instructions?
A. Proxies that are signed and returned but do not contain instructions will be voted (1) FOR the election of the twelve nominees for director, (2) FOR the approval of the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, (3) FOR the ratification of our independent auditors, (4) FOR approval of our executive officer compensation and (5) in accordance with the best judgment of the named proxies on any other matters properly brought before the meeting.
Q. Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy instruction form?
A. If you are a stockholder of record and do not provide a proxy, you must attend the meeting in order to vote your shares. If you are a beneficial holder of shares held in street name, your shares may be voted even if you do not provide voting instructions on your instruction form. Brokers have the authority under New York Stock Exchange rules to vote shares for which their customers do not provide voting instructions on certain "routine" matters. Under these rules, only the proposal to ratify our independent auditing firm is a "routine matter" being voted on by our stockholders this year.
Q. May stockholders ask questions at the meeting?
A. Yes. Our representatives will answer stockholders' questions of general interest at the end of the meeting. In order to give a greater number of stockholders an opportunity to ask questions, individuals or groups may be allowed to ask only one question and repetitive or follow-up questions may not be permitted.
Q. How many votes must be present to hold the meeting?
A. Your shares are counted as present at the meeting if you attend the meeting and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy card or vote via the Internet or telephone. In order for us to conduct our meeting, a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of March 10, 2015 must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting (45,162,176 shares). This is referred to as a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum at the meeting.
Q. How many votes are needed to approve the proposals?
A. Regarding proposal 1, the twelve nominees receiving the highest number of "For" votes will be elected as directors. This number is called a plurality. Shares not voted, whether by marking "Abstain" on the proxy card or otherwise, will have no impact on the election of directors. Regarding proposals 2, 3 and 4, the measures will pass if each receives the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. On these items, abstentions will count as votes against the proposal and broker non-votes will not be counted.
4
The first proposal to be voted on at the annual meeting will be the election of twelve director nominees. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board of Directors recommend approval of each of the nominees outlined below. If elected, each will serve a one-year term. Pursuant to a stockholders agreement, certain of our stockholders affiliated with Roger S. Penske and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. have agreed to vote together to elect members of our Board of Directors. See "Related Party Transactions" for a description of this stockholders agreement.
Penske Corporation recommended Greg Penske (Roger S. Penske's son) to our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as a candidate for election to our Board of Directors at the 2014 annual meeting. Penske Corporation has also informed us that it intends to recommend Greg Penske for re-election to our Board at the 2016 annual meeting. Beginning in 2017, in lieu of Greg Penske, Penske Corporation presently intends to recommend one of Mr. Penske's other sons, Roger Penske, Jr., to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for nomination as a candidate for election to our Board at the 2017, 2018 and 2019 annual meetings. It is expected that Mr. Penske, Jr. will serve as an advisory committee member of Penske Truck Leasing (PTL) for 2015 and 2016 and it is expected that Greg Penske will step down from our Board at the 2017 annual meeting and will serve as an advisory committee member of PTL beginning in 2017.
Director Nominees. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has established minimum qualifications for director nominees, including having personal
integrity, loyalty to
Penske Automotive Group and concern for its success and welfare, willingness to apply sound and independent business judgment and having sufficient time available for Penske Automotive Group matters.
Experience in at least one of the following is also desired: high level of leadership experience in business or administration, breadth of knowledge concerning issues affecting Penske Automotive
Group, willingness to contribute special competence to board activities, accomplishments within the director's respective field, and experience reading and understanding financial statements.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board of Directors reviewed the qualities of the Board members as a group, including the diversity of the Board's career experiences, viewpoints, company affiliations, expertise with respect to the various facets of our business operations, and business experiences. The Board did not employ any particular benchmarks with respect to these qualities, but was mindful of achieving an appropriate balance of these qualities with respect to the Board of Directors as a whole. Moreover, the Board of Directors and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered each nominee's overall service to Penske Automotive Group during the previous term, each nominee's personal integrity and adherence to the standards noted above, as well as the individual experience of each director noted within their biographies below.
Our Board of Directors Recommends a Vote "FOR" Each of the Following Nominees:
John D. Barr Chairman, Papa Murphy's Holdings, Inc.
Mr. Barr, 67, has served as a director since December 2002. Mr. Barr has been the Chairman of Papa Murphy's Holdings, Inc., a take-and-bake pizza chain, since September 2009 and was its Chief Executive Officer from April 2005 to January 1, 2012. From 1999 until April 2004, Mr. Barr served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Automotive Performance Industries, a vehicle transportation service provider. Prior thereto, Mr. Barr was President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as a member of the Board of Directors, of the Quaker State Corporation from June 1995 to 1999. Prior to joining Quaker State, Mr. Barr
5
spent 25 years with The Valvoline Company, a subsidiary of Ashland, Inc., where he was President and Chief Executive Officer from 1987 to 1995. Individual experience: Extensive oil industry experience from serving ultimately as COO and director of Quaker State Corporation; breadth of knowledge concerning issues affecting our Company; experience with franchise business model as CEO of Papa Murphy's Holdings.
Michael R. Eisenson Managing Director and CEO of Charlesbank Capital Partners LLC
Mr. Eisenson, 59, has served as a director since December 1993. He is a Managing Director and CEO of Charlesbank Capital Partners LLC, a private investment firm and the successor to Harvard Private Capital Group, Inc., which he joined in 1986. Mr. Eisenson is also a director of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P., Montpelier RE Holdings Ltd. and a number of private companies. In the previous five years, Mr. Eisenson was formerly a director of Animal Health International, Inc. and CIFC Corp. Individual experience: Familiarity with all of the Company's key operations from serving as our director since 1993; experience managing Charlesbank and affiliates and their portfolio companies; experience in commercial finance, private equity and leveraged finance; demonstrated success serving as our audit committee chairman.
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. President of Penske Automotive Group
Mr. Kurnick, Jr., 53, has served as our President since April 2008 and has been a director since May 2006. He also serves as President and a director of Penske Corporation, which he joined in 1995. Penske Corporation is a privately owned diversified transportation services company that holds, through its subsidiaries, interests in a number of businesses. Individual experience: Familiarity with all of the Company's key operations; breadth of knowledge concerning issues affecting our Company; extensive automotive industry experience; experience as President of Penske Corporation.
William J. Lovejoy General Manager of Lovejoy & Associates
Mr. Lovejoy, 74, has served as a director since March 2004. Since September 2003, Mr. Lovejoy has served as General Manager of Lovejoy & Associates, an automotive consulting firm. From January 2000 until December 2002, Mr. Lovejoy served as Group Vice President, North American vehicle sales, service and marketing for General Motors Corporation. From 1994 until December 1999, Mr. Lovejoy served as Vice President of General Motors service and parts operation. From 1962 until 1992, Mr. Lovejoy served in various capacities for General Motors Acceptance Corporation ("GMAC") and ultimately President of GMAC in 1990. Mr. Lovejoy also serves on the Advisory Board of On My Own of Michigan. Individual experience: Extensive automotive industry experience with General Motors, including its sales and service and parts operations; automotive finance experience culminating with experience as President of GMAC; breadth of knowledge concerning issues affecting our Company.
Kimberly J. McWaters Chairman and CEO of Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
Ms. McWaters, 50, has served as a director since December 2004. Ms. McWaters has served as CEO of Universal Technical Institute, Inc. ("UTI"), a nationwide provider of technical educational training for individuals seeking careers as professional automotive technicians, since October 2003, as Chairman of the Board of UTI since December 9, 2013 and as a director on UTI's board since February 2005. From February 2000 to February 2011, Ms. McWaters served as President of UTI. From 1984 until 2000, Ms. McWaters held several positions at UTI including Vice President of Marketing and Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Ms. McWaters is also a director of Mobile Mini, Inc. Individual experience: Automotive industry experience with Universal Technical Institute; accomplishment within her field culminating with leadership experience as Chief Executive Officer of UTI; expertise relating to service and parts operations and particularly service technicians.
6
Lucio A. Noto Retired Vice Chairman of ExxonMobil Corporation
Mr. Noto, 76, has served as a director since March 2001. Mr. Noto retired as Vice Chairman of ExxonMobil Corporation in January 2001, a position he had held since the merger of Exxon and Mobil companies in November 1999. Before the merger, Mr. Noto was Chairman and CEO of Mobil Corporation, where he had been employed since 1962. Mr. Noto is a managing partner of Midstream Partners LLC, an investment company specializing in energy and transportation projects. He is also a director of Philip Morris International and an Emeritus member of Temasek's International Advisory Panel. In the last five years, he has been a director of RHJ International SA. Individual experience: Extensive oil industry experience culminating with appointments as CEO of Mobil Corporation and Vice Chairman of ExxonMobil Corporation; breadth of knowledge concerning issues affecting our Company; experience as an executive and a director of some of the world's leading global corporations.
Greg Penske Chairman of the Board and CEO of Penske Motor Group
Mr. Penske, 52, has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Penske Motor Group, LLC, an automotive group that includes Longo Toyota, the largest automotive retail dealership in the United States by volume, since 1993. From 1997 to 1999 he was the President and CEO of Penske Motorsports, a publicly traded company which operated racetracks in the U.S. Mr. Penske currently serves as a director of Penske Corporation. In the last five years, he has been a director of Ares Capital Corporation. Mr. Penske is the son of our Chief Executive Officer, Roger S. Penske. Individual experience: Extensive automotive retail industry experience; relationships with key automotive partners; familiarity with all of the Company's key operations through Penske Corporation directorship.
Roger S. Penske Chairman of the Board and CEO of Penske Automotive Group
Mr. Penske, 78, has served as our Chairman and CEO since May 1999. Mr. Penske has also been Chairman of the Board and CEO of Penske Corporation since 1969. Mr. Penske has also been Chairman of the Board of Penske Truck Leasing Corporation since 1982. Mr. Penske serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Universal Technical Institute, and was formerly a director of General Electric Company in the previous five years. Mr. Penske also is Vice Chairman of the Downtown Detroit Partnership and a director of Business Leaders for Michigan. Individual experience: Extensive automotive industry experience; relationships with our key automotive partners; familiarity with all of the Company's key operations; experience as an executive and a director of some of the world's leading companies; significant ownership position of our stock through Penske Corporation and other affiliates.
Sandra E. Pierce Vice Chairman of FirstMerit Corporation and Chairman and CEO of FirstMerit Michigan
Ms. Pierce, 56, has served as a director since December 2012. Since February 1, 2013, Ms. Pierce has served as Vice Chairman of FirstMerit Corporation, and Chairman and CEO of FirstMerit Michigan. From 2005 until June 2012, Ms. Pierce served as the Chief Executive Officer and President at Charter One Bank Michigan, a division of Royal Bank of Scotland ("RBS"). In that role, she was responsible for the bank's commercial banking business, overseeing all state bank activities and was involved in local marketing and community giving. From July through December 2012, Ms. Pierce was a consultant for RBS. In addition, Ms. Pierce was the Regional Executive for the Midwest, overseeing activities in Illinois and Ohio. From 1978 through 2004, Ms. Pierce served as Regional Executive of Midwest Retail Operations for JPMorgan Chase, with responsibilities for Michigan and Indiana, and she held a number of management positions in the retail, commercial lending, and private banking businesses at JPMorgan Chase and its predecessor companies, Bank One, First Chicago NBD Corp. and NBD Bancorp. Ms. Pierce has performed leadership duties with numerous civic organizations, including Chairman and Trustee of Henry Ford Health System, Inc. since January 2012. Individual
7
Experience: Extensive retail and commercial banking experience; accomplished within her field culminating in CEO experience; extensive experience on private company boards and demonstrated commitment to civic works.
Kanji Sasaki Senior Vice President, International Business Development of Penske Automotive Group
Mr. Sasaki, 45, has served as a director since July 2014 and our Senior Vice President International Business Development since October 2014. Mr. Sasaki is currently an employee of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (Japan) and has held several positions with Mitsui since April, 1992. Mr. Sasaki served as the General Manager of Mitsui's First Motor Vehicles Division, Second Business Department from July 2013 to June 2014. From August 2011 to June 2013, he served as a General Manager in Mitsui's Motor Vehicles Americas Division, Penske & Logistics Business Department. From June 2007 to June 2011, Mr. Sasaki was on secondment to Hino Motors Sales U.S.A., serving as a Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Sasaki began his career at Mitsui in April 1992 and served in various capacities with Mitsui, including secondment to Toyota Motor Corporation and Hino Motors Ltd. Individual Experience: Global automotive industry experience; breadth of knowledge concerning international opportunities; affiliation with Mitsui, which is the Company's second largest stockholder.
Ronald G. Steinhart Retired Chairman and CEO, Commercial Banking Group, Bank One Corporation
Mr. Steinhart, 74, has served as a director since March 2001. Mr. Steinhart served as Chairman and CEO, Commercial Banking Group, of Bank One Corporation from December 1996 until his retirement in January 2000. From January 1995 to December 1996, Mr. Steinhart was Chairman and CEO of Bank One, Texas, N.A. Mr. Steinhart joined Bank One in connection with its merger with Team Bank, which he founded in 1988. Mr. Steinhart also serves as a director of Southcross Energy Partners, L.P. In the previous five years, Mr. Steinhart formerly served as a director of Texas Industries, Inc., Susser Holdings Corporation, Animal Health International, Inc. and as a Trustee of the MFS/Compass Group of mutual funds. Individual experience: Extensive experience in banking and commercial lending industries; experience with respect to automotive retail finance and insurance operations; extensive public company audit committee experience.
H. Brian Thompson Executive Chairman of GTT Communications, Inc.
Mr. Thompson, 75, has served as a director since March 2002. Mr. Thompson is Executive Chairman of GTT Communications, Inc., a leading global cloud network provider to multinational clients. Mr. Thompson continues to head his own private equity investment and advisory firm, Universal Telecommunications, Inc. From December 2002 to June 2007, Mr. Thompson was Chairman of Comsat International and also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Global TeleSystems Group, Inc. from March 1999 through September of 2000. Mr. Thompson was Chairman and CEO of LCI International from 1991 until its merger with Qwest Communications International Inc. in June 1998. Mr. Thompson became Vice Chairman of the board for Qwest until his resignation in December 1998. Mr. Thompson previously served as Executive Vice President of MCI Communications Corporation from 1981 to 1990, and prior to MCI, was a management consultant with the Washington, DC offices of McKinsey & Company for nine years, where he specialized in the management of telecommunications. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Axcelis Technologies, Inc., Pendrell Corporation, and Sonus Networks, Inc. Mr. Thompson received his MBA from Harvard's Graduate School of Business, and holds an undergraduate degree in chemical engineering from the University of Massachusetts. Individual experience: Extensive experience as an executive and director of numerous public companies; experience in a leadership role directing international corporations; perspective gained from leadership role in communications industry; demonstrated success serving as our lead independent director.
8
CURRENT DIRECTORS |
BOD |
Audit Committee |
Compensation & Management Development Committee |
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee |
Executive Committee |
|||||
John D. Barr |
M | F | | | | |||||
Michael R. Eisenson |
M | C, F | M | |||||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
M | | | | M | |||||
William J. Lovejoy |
M | M | ||||||||
Kimberly J. McWaters |
M | M | | C | | |||||
Lucio A. Noto |
M | M | ||||||||
Greg Penske |
M | | | | | |||||
Roger S. Penske |
C | C | ||||||||
Sandra E. Pierce |
M | | M | M | | |||||
Kanji Sasaki |
M | |||||||||
Ronald G. Steinhart |
M | F | | | | |||||
H. Brian Thompson |
M | C | M | M | ||||||
No. of Meetings 2014 |
6 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
Our Board of Directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Management Development Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Executive Committee. Charters for the Audit, Compensation and Management Development, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are available on our website, www.penskeautomotive.com, under the tab "Corporate Governance." The principal responsibilities of each committee are described below. Collectively, our directors attended over 93% of our board and committee meetings in 2014, and each director attended at least 83% of their meetings, other than Mr. Greg Penske who joined our Board in May 2014 and, due to business commitments prior to joining our Board, attended 60% of the meetings including three of four regularly scheduled meetings. All of our directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders and 11 of 12 directors serving at that time attended the annual meeting in 2014.
Committee Member Qualifications. Each of the members of our Audit, Compensation and Management Development, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are independent under New York Stock Exchange guidelines and our guidelines for director independence. The Board of Directors has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are "independent" and "financially literate" under New York Stock Exchange rules and applicable law, and three of the four are "audit committee financial experts," as that term is defined in Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to the:
9
The Compensation and Management Development Committee assists the Board of Directors in discharging its responsibility relating to:
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
Executive Committee. Our Executive Committee's primary function is to act upon matters when the Board of Directors is not in session. The Executive Committee has the full power and authority of the Board of Directors, except to the extent limited by law or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or other governance documents.
Board Structure and Lead Director. Roger S. Penske is the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer. We believe the combination of
these two offices represents the
most appropriate approach for our company due to Mr. Penske's significant ownership position through Penske Corporation, his extensive automotive industry experience, his relationships with our
key automotive partners and his experience as an executive and a director of some of the world's leading companies. In light of the combination of these positions, one of our governance principles is
to have an independent "Lead Director." Our Lead Director is responsible for:
Our Lead Director is H. Brian Thompson. He may be contacted by leaving a message at the following telephone number: 800-469-1634. All messages will be reviewed by our Corporate Secretary's office and all (other than frivolous messages) will be forwarded to the Lead Director. Any written communications to the independent directors as a group or the entire Board of Directors may be sent care of the Corporate Secretary to our principal executive office. These communications (other than frivolous messages) will also be forwarded to the Lead Director.
Director Independence. A majority of our Board of Directors is independent and each of the members of our audit, compensation and nominating committees is
independent. The Board of
Directors has determined that Ms. McWaters and Pierce and Messrs. Barr, Eisenson, Lovejoy, Steinhart and Thompson are each independent in accordance with the listing requirements of the
New York Stock Exchange and our guidelines for independent directors which can be found in our corporate governance guidelines on our website www.penskeautomotive.com and as set forth below. As
required by New York Stock Exchange rules, our Board of Directors determined that no material relationship exists which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of the independent directors.
10
For a director to be considered independent under our corporate governance guidelines, the Board of Directors must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with us. In addition to applying these guidelines, the Board of Directors considers relevant facts and circumstances in making the determination of independence, and not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from that of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. The Board considers the transactions, relationships and arrangements between the Company and affiliates of the director, including those described under "Related Party Transactions" and elsewhere in the proxy statement, in its independence determination. The Board also considers ownership of our or our affiliates' securities by the directors and their affiliates, ownership by our management team of any securities of affiliates of directors, and any direct or indirect investments in affiliates of Charlesbank Capital Partners, an affiliate of Michael Eisenson, or Transportation Resource Partners, an affiliate of Penske Corporation.
Under our guidelines, which are more stringent than the New York Stock Exchange guidelines, a director will not be independent if:
Risk Management. We have designed and implemented processes to manage risk in our operations. The Board of Director's role in risk management is primarily one of
oversight.
Management is responsible for the implementation and execution of our risk management initiatives. Our Board of Directors executes its oversight role directly and also through its various committees
as set forth below.
Audit Committee
11
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Compensation and Management Development Committee
Full Board of Directors
Securities Trading Policy/Anti-Hedging. Our securities trading policy applies to all of our directors, officers and employees and restricts trading in our
securities while in possession of material
nonpublic information. The policy prohibits our directors, officers, employees and their designees from engaging in hedging, short sales and other trading techniques that offset any decrease in market
value of our equity securities without the approval of our General Counsel. No such approvals were requested in 2014.
Stock Ownership Guidelines/Pledging. Our stock ownership guidelines, discussed in the CD&A below, require threshold levels of our stock to be held by executive
officers, other senior officers and
directors. These guidelines exclude any shares that are pledged by our directors and officers.
Controlled Company. Under the New York Stock Exchange rules, if a company is "controlled" it need not have a majority of independent directors or solely independent
compensation or
nominating committees. We are a "controlled company" because more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by Penske Corporation through its voting agreement with
Mitsui & Co. and their affiliates. These entities are considered a group due to the provisions of the stockholders agreement between these parties described under "Related Party
Transactions." Even though we are a "controlled company," we are fully compliant with the New York Stock Exchange rules for non-controlled companies.
Director Candidates. When considering new candidates for our Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses the network of contacts of
the Board of
Directors to compile potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a professional search firm. The committee considers whether the nominee would be independent and meets with
each candidate to discuss and consider his or her qualifications. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders pursuant to procedures
outlined below. Stockholder proposals for nominees should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary, Penske Automotive Group, 2555 Telegraph Road, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302. The committee's evaluation
of stockholder-proposed candidates will be the same as for any other candidates.
Director candidate submissions are to include:
12
Recommendations received by November 21, 2015, will be considered for nomination at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. Recommendations received after November 21, 2015 will be considered for nomination at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.
Location of Corporate Governance Documents. Our corporate governance guidelines and the other documents referenced in this section are posted on our website,
www.penskeautomotive.com, under the tab
"Corporate Governance." We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees and directors. We intend to disclose waivers, if any, for our executive officers
or directors from the code, and changes to the code, on our website.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers, directors
and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our stock
to file reports of ownership with the SEC. Our employees prepare these reports using information obtained from them and our records. We believe all Section 16(a) reports were timely filed in
2014.
Stockholder Nominations and Proposals for 2016. We must receive any proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14(a)-8 of the SEC proxy rules intended to be
presented to stockholders at our 2016 annual meeting
of stockholders at our principal executive offices at 2555 Telegraph Road, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0954 for inclusion in the proxy statement by November 21, 2015. These proposals must
also meet other requirements of the rules of the SEC relating to stockholder proposals. Stockholders who intend to present an item of business at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2016 (other than
a proposal submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement) must follow the procedures set forth in our bylaws and provide us notice of the business no later than February 5, 2016.
Summary
In light of the expiration of our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan later this year, our stockholders are being asked to approve the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan") which will be used to award incentive cash and equity compensation to our management and board of directors. We are implementing a new equity incentive plan due to the expiration of our prior equity incentive plan on November 1, 2015. Both our Compensation and Management Development Committee and Board of Directors have approved the Equity Incentive Plan, subject to stockholder approval at the annual meeting.
This plan provides up to 4.0 million shares for equity awards, including awards that are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and terminates in 2020. In the last three years, we have granted a gross amount of 1,337,274 incentive equity awards, which represents an average annual rate of shares issued as compared to shares outstanding of approximately 0.5%.
General
Upon adoption by stockholders at the annual meeting, the Equity Incentive Plan will authorize 4.0 million shares of our common stock for issuance as incentive awards. Incentive awards under the Equity Incentive Plan may be in the form of cash, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance compensation awards or common
13
stock. The number of shares available for incentive awards under the Equity Incentive Plan will be increased in an amount equal to incentive awards that are forfeited or terminated without issuance of shares and shares withheld by or tendered to us in connection with satisfaction of tax withholding obligations of an award. Adjustments will be made in the aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan in the event of a change affecting shares of our common stock, such as a stock dividend or split, recapitalization, reorganization, or merger. No more than 1,000,000 shares may be allocated for incentive awards to any one participant during any single calendar year and the maximum dollar amount payable to any employee in any one year for a cash incentive award is the lesser of $10.0 million or ten times their base salary.
Administration and Term
Our Compensation and Management Development Committee will administer the Equity Incentive Plan, including the power to determine when to grant incentive awards; which eligible participants will receive incentive awards; whether the award will be an option, stock appreciation right, restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance compensation award or company common stock; whether stock appreciation rights will be attached to options; and the number of shares or units to be allocated to each incentive award. The committee may impose conditions on the exercise of options and stock appreciation rights and upon the transfer of restricted stock or restricted stock units under the Equity Incentive Plan and may impose such other restrictions and requirements as it may deem appropriate, including reserving the right for us to reacquire shares issued pursuant to an incentive award.
The committee has delegated limited authority to the company's CEO to grant equity awards to the company's non-executive officer employees. The committee delegated this authority in order to permit the CEO to award limited equity grants without the specific action of the committee. Pursuant to this delegation, the CEO has had the discretion to make a maximum of 50,000 awards, which authority has been reviewed from time to time.
The Equity Incentive Plan will terminate on May 5, 2020, unless our Board of Directors terminates it prior to that date. Incentive awards existing after the termination date will continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the Equity Incentive Plan.
Eligibility
All present and future employees, directors and any company contributors are eligible to receive incentive awards under the Equity Incentive Plan.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock and restricted stock units issued pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan are subject to the following general restrictions: (1) no such shares or units may be sold, transferred, pledged, or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until the restrictions on such shares or units have lapsed or been removed under the provisions of the Equity Incentive Plan and (2) if a holder of restricted stock or restricted stock units ceases to be employed by us or one of our affiliates or ceases to be a company contributor, any shares of restricted stock, or restricted stock units, on which the restrictions have not lapsed or been otherwise removed will be forfeited. The committee is also authorized to impose further restrictions on restricted stock or restricted stock units, including additional events of forfeiture. The committee will establish the terms and conditions upon which the restrictions on those shares or units will lapse; provided that, unless otherwise specified in an award, the period of restriction must be at least one year from the date of grant. The terms and conditions may include, without limitation, the lapsing of those restrictions at the end of a specified period of time as a result of the disability or death of the participant, or as a result of the occurrence of a change-in-control. In addition, the committee may at any time, in its sole discretion, accelerate the time at which any or all restrictions will lapse or remove any and all restrictions.
14
Participants holding shares of restricted stock may exercise full voting rights with respect to those shares and are entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to those shares. Participants holding restricted stock units do not possess any voting rights with respect to those units, but are entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to those units if and as so provided in the related award agreement. Restricted stock units may be settled by the company in the form of shares of company common stock, cash, or a fixed combination of both, as determined by the committee.
Stock Options
Options granted under the Equity Incentive Plan may be incentive stock options (qualifying for favorable income tax treatment under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) or non-statutory stock options. The option price for any option awarded under the plan may not be less than 100% (or, in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder, 110%) of the fair market value of the our common stock on the date of the grant. The committee determines any vesting requirement for option awards. Payment of the option exercise price may be made in cash or as otherwise provided in an option award or by separate action of the committee. The maximum term of any option granted under the plan is ten years. To date, no stock options have been issued pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan.
Stock Appreciation Rights
The committee may award stock appreciation rights under the Equity Incentive Plan either with or without related options, or the committee may subsequently award and attach stock appreciation rights to a previously awarded nonstatutory option, and impose such conditions upon their exercise as it deems appropriate. When the stock appreciation right is exercisable, the holder may surrender to us all or a portion of the unexercised stock appreciation right and receive in exchange an amount equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value on the date of exercise of the common stock covered by the surrendered portion of the stock appreciation right and (ii) the exercise price of the common stock under the related option or, if the stock appreciation right is not related to an option, the fair market value of the common stock on the date the stock appreciation right was awarded. The committee may limit the amount that can be received when a stock appreciation right is exercised. When a stock appreciation right related to an option is exercised, the underlying option, to the extent of the stock appreciation right's surrender, will no longer be exercisable. Similarly, when an option is exercised, any stock appreciation rights attached to the option will no longer be exercisable. Our obligation arising upon exercise of a stock appreciation right may be paid in the company's common stock or in cash, or in any combination of the two, as the committee may determine. Stock appreciation rights may only be exercised when the underlying option is exercisable or, if there is no underlying option, at the times specified by the committee.
Performance Compensation Awards
At the time of grant, the committee may designate any incentive award (other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) as a performance compensation award as part of its intention to qualify the award as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. For incentive awards designated as performance compensation awards, the committee shall determine, among other items, the performance goals and performance period applicable to the awards. After the end of the performance period, the committee will certify in writing the level of performance goal that was attained for the performance period. The maximum performance award for a participant for a calendar year is 1,000,000 shares of company stock and the maximum dollar amount payable to any employee in any one year for a cash incentive award is the lesser of $10.0 million or ten times their base salary.
The committee may develop applicable performance goals using the following measurements: specified levels of or increases or decreases in revenue, return on equity,
15
earnings per share, total earnings, earnings growth, earnings from continuing operations, EBITDA, EBITDAR, return on capital/equity, return on assets, gross profit, earnings before interest and taxes, sales, sales growth, gross or operating margin, cost reduction goals, fixed cost coverage measurements (including the ratio of service and parts revenues to operating costs), return on investment, increase in the fair market value of our common stock, share price (including growth measures and total stockholder return), market capitalization, operating profit, profit margin, net income, cash flow (including operating cash flow and free cash flow), financial return ratios, expense ratios, total return to stockholders, market share, earnings measures/ratios, balance sheet measurements (including debt to equity ratios, maintenance of specified credit availability levels, compliance with credit covenants, inventory measurements and receivables/payables metrics), human resources measurements (including measurements of employee turnover, workers' compensation costs and employee satisfaction), internal rate of return, unit sales, same store sales, specified levels of acquisitions/acquired revenue, customer satisfaction and productivity and compliance objectives (including lack of material weakness in internal controls, each as determined in accordance with the relevant AICPA or PCAOB principles), or where applicable, as adjusted to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code, to omit the effects of extraordinary items, acquisitions or dispositions, the gain or loss on the disposal of a business segment, unusual or infrequently occurring events and transactions, accruals for incentive awards under the Equity Incentive Plan and/or cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles. These criteria may relate to the Company, one or more of its subsidiaries or one or more of its or their divisions or units, or any combination of the foregoing, and may be applied on an absolute basis and/or be relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, or any combination thereof, all as the committee shall determine.
Change-in-Control
The committee may, in its discretion, include provisions in award agreements that will make the incentive awards vested and/or fully exercisable upon a change in control of our Company. A change of control will be deemed to have taken place if any individual, entity or group other than the specified holders of common stock affiliated with Penske Corporation become the beneficial owner of Company securities that constitute more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company that may be cast for the election of directors to the Board of the Company (other than as a result of an issuance of securities initiated by the Company in the ordinary course of business).
Transferability of Incentive Awards
No options or stock appreciation rights granted under the Equity Incentive Plan, and, during the applicable period of restriction, no shares of restricted stock, may be sold, transferred, pledged, or otherwise disposed of, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Restricted stock units are not transferable by means of sale, assignment, exchange, pledge or otherwise. All rights granted to a participant under the plan will be exercisable during the participant's lifetime only by such participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the participant's guardians or legal representatives. Upon the death of a participant, the participant's personal representative or beneficiary may exercise the participant's rights under the plan. No incentive awards may be transferred for value or consideration without the prior approval of our stockholders.
Re-pricing Prior Awards
Except in connection with certain corporate transactions, the terms of outstanding incentive awards may not be amended to reduce the exercise price of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights or cancel outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for cash, other incentive awards or options or stock appreciation rights with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original
16
options or stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval.
Federal Income Tax Information
The following is a general summary of the current federal income tax treatment of incentive awards that would be authorized to be granted under the Equity Incentive Plan, based upon the current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder. As the rules governing the tax treatment of such awards are technical in nature, the following discussion of tax consequences is necessarily general in nature and does not purport to be complete. In addition, statutory provisions are subject to change, as are their interpretations, and their application may vary in individual circumstances. This discussion does not address the tax consequences under applicable state and local law.
Incentive Stock Options. A participant generally will not recognize income on the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. However, the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise is an adjustment item for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If a participant disposes of the stock received upon the exercise of an incentive stock option within certain specified periods (a "disqualifying disposition"), the participant will recognize ordinary income on the exercise of such incentive stock option in the same manner as on the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, as described below.
Non-qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant generally is not required to recognize income on the grant of a nonqualified stock option or a stock appreciation right. Instead, ordinary income generally is required to be recognized on the date the nonqualified stock option or stock appreciation right is exercised. In general, the amount of ordinary income required to be recognized is (i) in the case of a nonqualified stock option an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date over the exercise price and (ii) in the case of a stock appreciation right, the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of any shares received upon exercise.
Restricted Stock. Unless a participant who receives an award of restricted stock makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as described below, the participant generally is not required to recognize ordinary income on the award of restricted stock. Instead, on the date the restrictions lapse and the shares vest (that is, become transferable and no longer subject to forfeiture), the participant will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on that date over the amount paid, if any for those shares. If a participant makes a Section 83(b) election to recognize ordinary income on the date the shares are awarded, the amount of ordinary income required to be recognized is an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares on the date of award over the amount paid, if any for those shares. In that case, the participant will not be required to recognize additional ordinary income when the restrictions lapse and the shares vest.
Restricted Stock Units. A participant generally is not required to recognize income on the grant of a restricted stock unit. In general, on the date the units are paid, the participant will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the units on that date.
Company Common Stock. A participant generally is required to recognize income on the date of grant of company common stock in the amount of the fair market value of the stock received.
Gain or Loss on Sale or Exchange of Shares. In general, gain or loss from the sale or exchange of shares granted under the Equity Incentive Plan will be treated as capital gain or loss, provided that the shares are held as capital assets at the time of the sale or exchange.
Deductibility by Us. We generally are not allowed a deduction in connection with the grant
17
or exercise of an incentive stock option. However, if a participant is required to recognize income as a result of a disqualifying disposition, we will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income so recognized. In the case of a nonqualified stock option (including an incentive stock option that is treated as a nonqualified stock option, as described above), a stock appreciation right, or restricted stock or restricted stock unit, in general, we will be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by a participant, provided that certain income tax reporting requirements are satisfied.
Performance-Based Compensation. Subject to certain exceptions, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, disallows federal income tax deductions for compensation paid by a publicly-held corporation to certain executives to the extent the amount paid to an executive exceeds $1 million for the taxable year. The Equity Incentive Plan has been designed to allow the committee to grant cash awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights and performance compensation awards that are intended to qualify under an exception to the deduction limit of Section 162(m) for "performance-based compensation."
Modification of Equity Incentive Plan
Our board of directors may amend, alter, or terminate the Equity Incentive Plan as it deems advisable, provided that our stockholders must approve any amendment that would (i) materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the Equity Incentive Plan, (ii) materially increase the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan or (iii) materially modify the requirements of eligibility for participation in the Equity Incentive Plan. Incentive awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan may be amended with the consent of the participant so long as the amended award is consistent with the terms of the plan.
New Plan Benefits
Because awards under the Equity Incentive Plan are subject to the discretion of the Compensation and Management Development Committee, the benefits and amounts that will be received or allocated in the future under the Equity Incentive Plan, as well as amounts that would have been received in the last fiscal year had the Equity Incentive Plan been in effect, are not determinable.
Vote Required
In order to be adopted, the Equity Incentive Plan must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present and entitled to vote at the meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast against the proposal. If our stockholders do not approve the Equity Incentive Plan, we will be unable to make any incentive awards to our management team or board of directors upon the expiration of our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan later this year.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL 2
18
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table provides details regarding the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights granted under our equity compensation plans (including individual equity compensation arrangements) as of December 31, 2014.
Plan Category |
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (A) |
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (B) |
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (A)) (C) |
||||
|
||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
| | $ | | | 1,379,587 | ||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
| | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
| | | | | 1,379,587 |
Our Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, and their respective affiliates (collectively referred to as "Deloitte") as our principal independent auditing firm for 2015. In performing its services for 2015, we anticipate Deloitte will not audit our subsidiaries which own the majority of our international operations and their opinions, insofar as they relate to those operations, will be based solely on the report of the independent auditor of those operations, KPMG Audit Plc ("KPMG"). We refer to Deloitte and KPMG collectively as our independent auditing firms.
We have determined to submit the selection of auditors to stockholder ratification, even though it is not required by our governing documents or Delaware law. If the selection of Deloitte as our independent auditors is not ratified by our stockholders, our Audit Committee will re-evaluate its selection, taking into consideration the stockholder vote on the ratification and the advisability of selecting new auditors prior to completion of the 2015 audit.
Our Audit Committee is solely responsible for selecting, engaging and terminating our independent auditing firms, and may do so at any time at its discretion. It is anticipated that a representative of Deloitte will be present at the annual meeting with the opportunity to make a statement and to answer appropriate questions.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
19
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT |
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of our accounting functions and internal controls as more fully discussed above under "Our Corporate Governance." The Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate our independent auditing firms, and is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors that our financial statements be included in our annual report on Form 10-K.
The Audit Committee took a number of steps in making this recommendation for our 2014 annual report. The Audit Committee discussed with our independent auditing firms those matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), including information regarding their independence and the scope and results of their audit. These communications and discussions were intended to assist the Audit Committee in overseeing the financial reporting and disclosure process. The Audit Committee also discussed the independent auditing firms' independence and received the letters and written disclosures from the independent auditing firms required by the PCAOB. Finally, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the annual audited financial statements with our management and the independent auditing firms in advance of the public release of operating results, and before the filing of our annual and quarterly reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Based on the foregoing, and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our audited financial statements be included in our 2014 annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2015.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Michael R. Eisenson (Chairman)
John D. Barr
Kimberly J. McWaters
Ronald G. Steinhart
20
INDEPENDENT AUDITING FIRMS
We paid the independent auditing firms the fees described below in 2014 and 2013, all of which services were approved by our Audit Committee:
Audit Services:
Audit Related Services:
Tax Fees:
All Other Fees:
|
|
Deloitte |
|
KPMG | ||||||||||
|
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Audit Fees |
$ | 1,320,500 | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,253,265 | $ | 979,400 | ||||||
Audit Related Fees |
188,500 | 81,500 | 46,175 | 36,000 | ||||||||||
Tax Fees |
| | | | ||||||||||
Tax Compliance |
128,359 | 50,000 | | | ||||||||||
Other Tax Fees |
| 490,618 | | 470,750 | | 23,000 | | | ||||||
All Other Fees |
| | 9,600 | 9,600 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Fees |
$ | 2,127,977 | $ | 1,852,250 | $ | 1,332,040 | $ | 1,025,000 |
The Audit Committee has considered the nature of the above-listed services provided by the independent auditing firms and determined that they are compatible with their provision of independent audit services under relevant guidance. The Audit Committee has discussed these services with the independent auditing firms and management and determined that they are permitted under the Code of Professional Conduct of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the auditor independence requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and the laws and regulations administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Pre-approval Policy. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy requiring pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditing firms. The primary purpose of this policy is to ensure that we engage our public accountants with a view toward maintaining independence. The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all services relating to work performed for us by our independent auditing firms and related fees. The Audit Committee must also approve fees incurred for pre-approved services that are in excess of the approved amount. Pre-approval of audit and non-audit services and fees may be given at any time up to a year before commencement of the specified service. The Chairman of the Audit Committee may independently approve fees and services as long as they are reviewed and ratified by the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. All of the services and related fees set forth above were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.
21
Last year, our stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers as described under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and "Executive Compensation" with over 99% of the votes cast by our stockholders voting in favor. We are again seeking a non-binding advisory vote on our executive compensation and there have not been any significant changes to the elements of our executive compensation program in 2014. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Compensation and Management Development Committee however, the committee will take the outcome of the vote into account when making future executive compensation decisions.
Our compensation program is designed to motivate our executive officers to enhance long-term stockholder value and to attract and retain the highest quality executive and key employee talent available. We believe our executive compensation is aligned with increasing the value of our common stock and promoting our key strategies, values and long term financial and operational objectives. In this regard, we note that:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS BELIEVES THAT THE COMPENSATION OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IS APPROPRIATE AND RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY RESOLUTION:
"RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED."
22
Our executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors and hold office until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal from office. Biographies of Messrs. Kurnick and Penske are set forth above. Biographies of our other executive officers are provided below:
David K. Jones, 45, has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 3, 2011. Mr. Jones served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for our international operations from October 2010 to May 2011. He also has served as our Vice President Financial Compliance and Controls from April 2006 to May 2011. Mr. Jones joined the Company in 2003 as our Director of Financial Reporting. Prior to joining us, Mr. Jones was a Senior Manager at Andersen LLP, an accounting and financial advisory services firm, which he joined in 1991.
Calvin C. Sharp, 63, has served as our Executive Vice President Human Resources since July 1, 2007. Mr. Sharp served as Senior Vice President Human Resources for our Eastern Region from October 2003 to July 2007. From 1988 to 2003, Mr. Sharp served in numerous positions with Detroit Diesel Corporation, culminating in his appointment as Senior Vice President Administration. From 1974 to 1988, Mr. Sharp held various positions in Human Resources Management with General Motors.
Shane M. Spradlin, 45, has served as our Executive Vice President since February 2010, our General Counsel since December 2007, and our Corporate Secretary since March 2004. Mr. Spradlin joined our Company in March 2003. From 1999 to 2003, he served as Corporate Counsel to Nextel Communications in Reston, Virginia. From 1995 through 1999, Mr. Spradlin was an associate with the New York and Washington, D.C. offices of Latham & Watkins, specializing in corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions.
J.D. Carlson, 45, has served as our Senior Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer since May 3, 2011. Mr. Carlson has served as our Corporate Controller since April 2006. Prior to joining us, Mr. Carlson was Corporate Controller for Tecumseh Products. He was previously a Senior Manager for PricewaterhouseCoopers, an accounting and financial advisory services firm, which he joined in 1995.
The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth below with management. Based on this review and these discussions with management, the committee has recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Disclosure and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
The Compensation & Management
Development Committee of the Board of Directors
H.
Brian Thompson (Chairman)
William J. Lovejoy
Sandra A. Pierce
23
Executive Summary. Our compensation program is designed to motivate our executive officers to enhance long-term stockholder value and to attract and retain the highest quality executive and key employee talent available. We believe our executive compensation should be aligned with increasing the value of our common stock and promoting our key strategies, values and long term financial and operational objectives. As further discussed below:
In recent years, Mr. Penske has received an annual performance based award payable in shares of restricted stock. For 2014, Mr. Penske was eligible to attain up to 150% of his target performance based award. As detailed below, Mr. Penske achieved 92% of the performance targets listed below, entitling him to approximately $3.3 million in shares of restricted stock granted in February 2015.
In 2014, over 99% of the votes cast by our stockholders approved our 2013 executive compensation and there have not been any significant changes to the elements of our executive compensation in 2014.
Compensation Philosophy. Other than with respect to Mr. Penske, the majority of our executive and employee compensation is payable in cash in the short-term,
and is comprised
principally of salary and cash bonuses. We use cash compensation as the majority of our compensation because we believe it provides the most flexibility for our employees and is less dilutive to
existing stockholders than equity compensation. The compensation committee also recognizes that stock prices may reflect factors other than long-term performance, such as general economic conditions
and varying attitudes among investors toward the stock market in general and toward automotive retail companies specifically. However, we also provide long-term compensation in the form of restricted
stock awards for senior employees. Our restricted stock program awards typically vest over four years, with 70% of any award vesting in the third and fourth years. We believe this long term
compensation helps to align management's goals with those of our other stockholders and provides a long-term retention inducement for our key employees, as discussed below under the heading "Incentive
Equity Awards."
Outside Advisors and Consultants. Our compensation committee has full access to any
24
of our employees and has the authority to hire outside consultants and advisors at its discretion, though it did not do so in 2014. Notwithstanding management's participation in the executive compensation process, all executive officer compensation determinations are made by the committee, using its independent judgment and analysis.
Role of Executive Officers. The compensation committee relies on our senior management to assist in fulfilling many of its duties, in particular our Executive Vice
President Human Resources and Chief Executive Officer, each of whom attends part of most committee meetings. These executives make recommendations concerning our compensation
policies generally, certain specific elements of compensation for senior management (such as equity awards and bonuses), and report to the committee as to company personnel and developments. Our Chief
Executive Officer also makes specific compensation recommendations concerning our other executive officers and certain other employees. Our Chief Executive Officer does not participate in determining
his own compensation.
Addressing Risk. Our compensation committee recognizes that any incentive based compensation arrangement induces an inherent element of risk taking by senior
management. We incent
management through annual discretionary bonuses, restricted stock grants and, in some cases, performance based bonuses. The committee assesses the risk related to our compensation policies for the
named executive officers and for the employees generally, and has determined that our compensation arrangements do not lend themselves to unnecessary or excessive risk taking. The committee believes
that any inherent risk is mitigated by the following factors:
The responsibilities of the compensation committee and committee member independence are described under "Our Corporate Governance" beginning on page 9.
Compensation Recovery Policy. We have a policy regarding the recovery of unfairly earned compensation. Under the policy, if our Board determines that a member of
management earned performance
based compensation or incentive compensation within the last three years due to fraud, negligence or intentional misconduct, and such conduct was a significant contributing factor to our restating our
financial statements or the reporting of material inaccuracies relating to financial reporting or other performance metrics used in those awards, our Board has the discretion to cause that employee to
repay and/or forfeit all compensation that was expressly conditioned upon the achievement of the misreported financial results.
Equity Award Approval Policy. We have an equity award approval policy which requires that all equity awards be approved by the committee and that the grant date of
all awards except those
discussed below shall be the date of the approval by the committee. As part of that policy, the compensation committee delegated to our Chief Executive Officer the authority to grant awards of up to
an aggregate of 50,000 shares of our common stock (or stock equivalents) for new hires or spot awards, provided that the awards are reported to the committee at its next meeting. Our compensation
committee believes that this delegation of authority allows us to meet our ongoing business needs in a practical manner. Our Chief Executive Officer approved awards for 10,082 shares under that
authority in 2014, which awards were ratified by the committee.
25
Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our stock ownership guidelines are designed to align our management and Board members' interests with our stockholders. The guidelines
require that officers and
directors own the following levels of common stock, expressed as a multiple of base salary.
Executive Officer Level |
|
Multiple of Base Salary |
||
CEO | | 8x | ||
President | 4x | |||
Executive Vice Presidents | | 2x | ||
Principal Accounting Officer | 1x |
Non-employee board members are required to own common stock equal to five times our annual retainer (currently, $40,000 × 5= $200,000). Directors and officers have until the later of five years from adoption of the policy or appointment, to reach the minimum ownership level, though our policy allows extensions at the discretion of the Chairman and Lead Independent Director. These guidelines exclude any shares that are pledged by any of our directors and officers.
Determination of Amounts. The compensation committee reviews and determines all aspects of compensation for our executive officers. In making decisions regarding
non-CEO compensation, the
committee receives input from our Chief Executive Officer. Except with respect to our annual performance awards to our Chef Executive Officer and President (discussed below), our compensation
committee does not use formulas in determining the amount and mix of compensation. The committee believes that solely using annual quantitative performance measurements does not create the appropriate
balance of incentives to build long-term value. Thus, the committee evaluates a broad range of qualitative factors, including reliability, a track record of integrity, good judgment, foresight and the
ability to lead others.
The committee reviews salary adjustments with a view to maintaining external compensation competitiveness. We benchmark competitiveness against a group of publicly traded automotive retailers (Asbury Automotive Group, AutoNation, CarMax, Group 1 Automotive, Lithia Motors and Sonic Automotive). While we benchmark our compensation against our industry peers, we do not target a specific quartile of pay for our executive officers as compared to our peers as we believe each of our executive officer's circumstances and challenges are unique to the individual and we base our compensation accordingly.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally imposes a $1 million per year ceiling
on the tax-deductibility of some
types of compensation paid to certain of the named executive officers of a public company, unless the remuneration is treated as performance-based. We have designed our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, and
our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, to facilitate the payment of performance-based compensation meeting these tax deductibility rules. For any of these awards, the compensation committee reserves
discretion to reduce (but not increase) the payout under the award.
Our Compensation Program. Our compensation program primarily consists of four elements:
Base Salary. The salaries of our executive officers are determined by scope of job responsibility, experience, individual performance, historical salary levels and
the
benchmarking information discussed above. The committee approves salary levels for executive officers and certain key employees in order to maintain external compensation competitiveness using the
benchmarks noted above, and to reflect the performance of those employees in the prior year and to reflect any
26
change in the employee's responsibilities. The evaluation of the individual's performance is based upon the committee's subjective perception of that performance, based in large part on input from our Chief Executive Officer and the factors noted above under "Determination of Amounts."
The committee also considers our Company-wide performance and general economic factors. The items of corporate performance that are considered for our named executive officers are the same as those with respect to the award detailed below under "2014 Compensation." Our compensation committee uses these factors in a subjective evaluation to gauge Company performance, keeping in mind the impact of the general performance of the automotive retail industry.
Annual Bonus Payments. Our senior management is eligible to receive annual discretionary cash bonus payments. In the past several years, our Chief Executive Officer
and President have
not received any discretionary bonus payments, receiving only the restricted stock grants resulting from their performance based awards described below under "2014 Compensation" and "President
Compensation." We pay annual bonuses to our other executive officers to provide an incentive for future performance and as a reward for performance during the prior year. These discretionary bonus
payments are determined in varying degrees based on three criteria:
The items of Company-wide performance that are considered for our named executive officers are the same as those detailed below under "2014 Compensation." Our compensation committee uses these factors in a subjective evaluation to gauge Company performance, keeping in mind the impact of the overall performance of the automotive retail industry. The evaluation of the individual's performance and the performance of the individual's business unit is based on the committee's perception of that performance, based in part on input from our Chief Executive Officer and the factors noted above under "Determination of Amounts."
Incentive Equity Awards. We issue equity incentive awards under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. This plan initially provided up to two million shares for equity
awards, including awards
that are intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and terminates on November 1, 2015. We have granted 910,723 incentive equity awards under
this plan since 2012, leaving availability for 1,089,277 awards (giving effect to certain forfeitures and shares withheld).
Each member of senior management is eligible to receive a restricted stock award because we believe these awards effectively align management's goals with those of our other stockholders. Restricted stock grants for management typically vest over four years at a rate of 15%, 15%, 20% and 50% per year, and are subject to forfeiture in the event the employee departs from the Company before vesting. We believe these awards provide a longer-term incentive for management because the majority of the award vests in the third and fourth year. We employ this form of compensation in part because many of our initiatives may take several years to yield benefits. We also believe that weighted vesting of these awards provides an additional incentive to retain our valuable employees due to the unvested value that may be created over time. Our restricted stock awards mirror our other outstanding stock, including the right to vote with our other stockholders and receive dividends. Under certain situations, we have issued restricted stock units to employees, in particular in foreign jurisdictions, which do not include voting rights but otherwise mirror the restricted stock awards.
Restricted stock grants are generally discretionary and are based upon the awards granted in the prior year adjusted to reflect changes in the responsibilities of the named executive officers, the individual's performance and Company-wide performance measures
27
detailed below under "2014 Compensation," keeping in mind the overall performance of the automotive retail industry. The amounts are also established to induce retention, as the awards are the sole aspect of long-term compensation for our named executive officers. In 2014, the committee approved the grant of approximately 285,013 incentive equity awards to employees (representing approximately 0.3% of our current outstanding equity), including the awards relating to the 2014 management incentive awards for our Chief Executive Officer and President and excluding awards to our non-employee directors.
Other Compensation. We may also provide employees with selected other benefits or perquisites in order to attract and retain highly skilled employees. With respect
to health and
welfare benefits, the committee believes that our employees should receive a meaningful benefit package commensurate with those of other automotive retailers, recognizing the increasing cost of those
benefits in recent years. We also provide our U.S. employees with company matching under our 401(k) plan. Our named executive officers and directors are also provided with an automobile allowance or
the use of a company vehicle. From time to time, we may provide other benefits to certain members of our senior management, such as payment for a country club membership or tax gross-ups for certain
items. We have valued these benefits in the following disclosure tables based on our cost except for situations where the employee or director has used a company owned vehicle, in which case we have
used Internal Revenue Service guidelines. We review these benefits on a case-by-case basis and believe, if limited in scope, such benefits can provide an incentive to long term performance and help
retain our valuable employees.
No Employment Agreements or Pre-arranged Severance Compensation. None of our current executive officers have been provided an employment agreement, nor are they
entitled to any pre-arranged severance compensation. We believe
our mix of short-term and long-term compensation provides a retention incentive that makes an employment contract unnecessary, while providing us flexibility with respect to managing the departure of
an executive officer. Our lack of pre-arranged severance compensation is consistent with our performance based compensation philosophy, and provides us the flexibility to enter into post-employment
arrangements based on circumstances existing upon departure. We have historically entered into varying types of severance arrangements with departing members of our senior management, which have
included vesting of restricted stock and consulting agreements, as we believe it may be important to have continuing access to these individuals' knowledge base and guidance. In the event we employ
consulting agreements, we have typically obtained a non-compete agreement with these individuals. With respect to a change in control, none of our current executive officers have been guaranteed any
change of control payments, however, certain of our outstanding restricted stock grants provide that in the event of a change of control, the award will vest.
2014 Compensation
Chief Executive Officer Compensation. Our compensation committee established 2014 performance targets for a performance based award for Mr. Penske in February 2014. The award established a threshold payout of $2.4 million (50% of targets), a target payout of $3.6 million (100% of targets) and a maximum potential payout of $4.8 million (150% of targets) to be paid in shares of restricted stock to be granted in 2015. Mr. Penske achieved 92% of the performance metrics noted below, which entitled him to approximately $3.3 million in shares of restricted stock granted in February 2015. Mr. Penske did not receive an annual cash bonus because he received this restricted stock grant in lieu of a cash bonus.
28
The specific 2014 performance objectives and related performance were as follows:
Objective |
Result |
% of Award |
Achievement | |||
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $565 million (100% attainment). EBITDA below $485 million results in no attainment, EBITDA of $485 million results in 50% attainment, and EBITDA of $600 million yields 200% attainment.(1)(2) |
$568.8 | 20% | 22% | |||
compliance with the covenants in our U.S. and U.K. credit facilities |
Compliant | 5% | 5% | |||
ROE (return on equity) of 17.8% to 18.5% (100% attainment). ROE below 17.8% results in no attainment, ROE above 18.5% yields 150% attainment.(1)(2)(3) |
18.46% | 20% | 20% | |||
common stock price performance exceeds the S&P 500 Index during 2014 (100% attainment) Performance below the S&P 500 results in no attainment and outperformance by 15% yields 150% attainment(2) |
4% vs 11% | 10% | 0% | |||
maintain quarter-end availability under our U.S. and U.K. credit facilities of at least $250 million, excluding funds used for repurchases of debt or common stock |
Achieved | 5% | 5% | |||
customer satisfaction scores exceed manufacturer objectives at 85% of our U.S. franchises |
Exceeds | 10% | 10% | |||
no material weaknesses in our internal controls |
None | 10% | 10% | |||
reduce selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of gross profit by 100 basis points (100% attainment). Reduction below 50 basis points results in no attainment, and reduction of 150 basis points yields 150% attainment.(1)(2) |
Not Achieved | 10% | 0% | |||
same-store revenue growth of 5% (100% attainment). Growth below 5% results in no attainment, and growth of 10% yields 200% attainment.(2) |
11.7% | 10% | 20% | |||
| | | | | | |
Total |
100% | 92% |
29
In February 2015, the committee established a similar performance based award for Mr. Penske with respect to 2015, with a threshold payout of $2.5 million (50% of target), a target payout of $5.0 million (100% of target) and a maximum potential payout of $7.5 million (150% of target) to be paid in shares of restricted stock to be granted in 2016. The performance objectives for 2015 are as follows:
Objective |
% of Award | |
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $664 million (100% attainment). EBITDA below $569 million results in no attainment, EBITDA of $569 million results in 50% attainment, and EBITDA of $700 million yields 200% attainment.(1)(2) |
20% | |
compliance with the financial covenants in our U.S. and U.K. credit facilities |
5% | |
ROE (return on equity) of 17.8% to 18.5% (100% attainment). ROE below 17.8% results in no attainment, ROE above 18.5% yields 150% attainment(1)(2)(3) |
20% | |
common stock price performance exceeds the S&P 500 Index during 2015 (100% attainment) Performance below the S&P 500 results in no attainment and outperformance by 15% yields 150% attainment.(2) |
10% | |
customer satisfaction scores exceed manufacturer objectives at 85% of our U.S. franchises |
12.5% | |
no material weaknesses in our internal controls |
12.5% | |
reduce selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of gross profit by 100 basis points (100% attainment). Reduction below 50 basis points results in no attainment, reduction of 50 basis points yields 50% attainment, and reduction of 150 basis points yields 150% attainment.(1) (2) |
10% | |
same-store revenue growth of 5% (100% attainment). Growth of 10% yields 200% attainment and growth below 5% results in no attainment.(2) |
10% | |
| | |
Total |
100% |
President Compensation. In February 2014, the committee established a similar performance based award for Mr. Kurnick with respect to 2014, with a threshold payout of $350,000 (50% of targets), a target payout of $700,000 (100% of targets) and a maximum potential payout of $1.05 million (150% of targets) to be paid in shares of restricted stock to be granted in 2015. The performance objectives and component percentages are the same as those set forth above with respect to the 2014 award for Mr. Penske. Mr. Kurnick achieved 92% of the performance metrics noted below, which entitled him to approximately $645,200 in shares of restricted stock granted in February 2015. Mr. Kurnick did not receive an annual cash bonus because he received this restricted stock grant in lieu of a cash bonus.
In February 2015, the committee established a similar performance based award for Mr. Kurnick with respect to 2015, with a threshold payout of $500,000 (50% of target), a target payout of $1.0 million (100% of target)
30
and a maximum potential payout of $1.5 million (150% of target) to be paid in shares of restricted stock to be granted in 2016. The performance objectives and component percentages are the same as those set forth above with respect to the 2015 award for Mr. Penske.
Mr. Kurnick is also the President of Penske Corporation (our controlling stockholder) and he receives a substantial amount of compensation from Penske Corporation. While Mr. Kurnick devotes a substantial amount of time and effort to our company, his total compensation paid by us reflects that he devotes time to Penske Corporation. Our committee does not track the exact percentage of time spent on Penske Automotive matters, recognizing that the amount varies from year to year, but it is generally expected to represent approximately 75% of his time. In determining Mr. Kurnick's pay, our compensation committee considers the impact of the time Mr. Kurnick spends on Penske Automotive matters, including the benefits of his leadership capabilities.
Other Executive Officer Compensation. Effective May 1, 2014, Mr. Jones's salary was increased from $450,000 to $475,000. Our compensation committee
approved this increase in recognition
of the Company's performance in 2013 and 2014 and based upon its benchmarking against our peer companies. Each of our named executive officers received the stock awards and bonuses set forth in the
tables below. In addition, in February 2015, Messrs. Jones, Sharp and Spradlin received 8,625, 3,750, and 7,500 shares of restricted stock, respectively, vesting over four years at a rate of
15%, 15%, 20% and 50% as part of our annual grant under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. In 2014, we were reimbursed approximately five percent of Mr. Spradlin's base salary by Penske
Corporation to reflect his efforts on behalf of Penske Corporation. The full amount of Mr. Spradlin's base salary is shown in the table below.
31
The following table contains information concerning 2014 annual and long-term compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers, collectively referred to as the "named executive officers." For a discussion of our methodology in valuing the items set forth under "All Other Compensation," see "CD&A Other Compensation."
2014 Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary ($) |
|
Bonus ($) |
|
Stock Awards ($)(1) |
|
All Other Compensation ($) |
|
Total ($) |
|||||||
Roger S. Penske |
| 2014 | $ | 1,200,000 | | | $ | 3,600,000 | (2) | $ | 380,298 | (3) | $ | 5,180,298 | |||||
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2013 | | 1,200,000 | | | | 3,600,000 | | 305,569 | | 5,105,569 | |||||||
|
| 2012 | | 1,200,000 | | | | 3,500,000 | | 209,336 | | 4,909,336 | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
| 2014 | | 700,000 | | | | 700,000 | (4) | | 128,649 | (5) | | 1,528,649 | |||||
President |
| 2013 | | 700,000 | | | | 700,000 | | 96,580 | | 1,496,580 | |||||||
|
| 2012 | | 700,000 | | | | 600,000 | | 71,576 | | 1,371,576 | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
David K. Jones |
| 2014 | | 466,058 | | 235,000 | | 357,175 | | 69,483 | (6) | | 1,127,716 | ||||||
Executive Vice President & Chief |
| 2013 | | 427,884 | | 210,000 | | 316,168 | | 62,487 | | 1,016,539 | |||||||
Financial Officer |
| 2012 | | 400,000 | | 180,000 | | 241,100 | | 72,597 | | 893,697 | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Calvin C. Sharp |
| 2014 | | 459,327 | | 130,000 | | 153,860 | | 64,705 | (7) | | 807,892 | ||||||
Executive Vice President Human |
| 2013 | | 435,000 | | 115,000 | | 136,338 | | 56,834 | | 743,172 | |||||||
Resources |
| 2012 | | 416,827 | | 100,000 | | 108,495 | | 50,280 | | 675,602 | |||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Shane M. Spradlin |
| 2014 | | 474,327 | | 235,000 | | 322,720 | | 59,273 | (8) | | 1,091,320 | ||||||
Executive Vice President, General |
| 2013 | | 450,000 | | 210,000 | | 305,420 | | 53,361 | | 1,018,781 | |||||||
Counsel & Secretary |
| 2012 | | 424,000 | | 180,000 | | 192,880 | | 66,996 | | 863,876 |
32
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2014
|
Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|
All other Awards: Number of Shares |
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock |
||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position |
Grant Date |
|
Threshold ($) |
|
Target ($) |
|
Maximum ($) |
|
of Stock |
|
Awards ($) |
||||||||
Roger S. Penske |
2/27/2014 | | 2,400,000 | | 3,600,000 | $ | 4,800,000 | | | $ | 3,600,000 | ||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2/27/2014 | | | | | | | | 105,259 | | 4,627,200 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
2/27/2014 | | 350,000 | | 700,000 | $ | 1,050,000 | | | | 700,000 | ||||||||
President |
2/27/2014 | | | | | | | | 22,739 | | 999,600 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
David K. Jones |
2/27/2014 | | | | | | | | 8,125 | | 357,175 | ||||||||
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Calvin C. Sharp |
2/27/2014 | | | | | | | | 3,500 | | 153,860 | ||||||||
Executive Vice President Human Resources |
| | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Shane M. Spradlin |
2/27/2014 | | | | | | | | 7,000 | | 307,720 | ||||||||
Executive Vice President, |
12/16/2014 | | | | | | | | 321 | | 15,000 | ||||||||
General Counsel & Secretary |
| | | | |
This table reflects two years of awards for Messrs. Penske and Kurnick: the 2013 awards attained that were paid in the form of restricted stock in 2014, and the awards relating to 2014 that were paid in 2015.
Narrative Discussion of Summary Compensation Table and Plan Based Awards
The amounts set forth in the two preceding tables reflect payments and awards to our named executive officers based on the principles and descriptions discussed under "CD&A."
Mr. Penske's Performance Based Award. Our compensation committee established 2014 performance targets for a performance based award for Mr. Penske in February 2014. The award established a threshold payout of $2.4 million (50% of targets), a target payout of $3.6 million (100% of targets) and a maximum potential payout of $4.8 million (150% of targets) to be paid in shares of restricted stock to be granted in 2015. Mr. Penske achieved 92% of the performance metrics noted above relating to this award, which entitled him to approximately $3.3 million in shares of restricted stock granted in February 2015, as more fully discussed above in "CD&A Chief Executive Officer Compensation." Mr. Penske did not receive an annual cash bonus because he received this restricted stock grant in lieu of a cash bonus.
Mr. Kurnick's Performance Based Award. In February 2014, the committee established a similar performance based award for Mr. Kurnick with respect to 2014, with a threshold payout of $350,000 (50%
33
of targets), a target payout of $700,000 (100% of targets) and a maximum potential payout of $1.05 million (150% of targets) to be paid in shares of restricted stock to be granted in 2015. Mr. Kurnick achieved 92% of the performance metrics noted above relating to this award, which entitled him to approximately $645,200 in shares of restricted stock granted in February 2015, as more fully discussed above in "CD&A President Compensation." Mr. Kurnick did not receive an annual cash bonus because he received this restricted stock grant in lieu of a cash bonus.
Other Restricted Stock Awards. The equity awards granted in February 2014 to Messrs. Jones, Sharp and Spradlin were awarded as part of an annual grant of restricted stock pursuant to the terms of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. The December award to Mr. Spradlin was in recognition of achievement by that officer in regards to performance in 2014.These awards each vest annually on June 1 over four years at a rate of 15%, 15%, 20% and 50% and were issued based on principles described in the "CD&A Incentive Equity Awards."
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2014 Year-End
|
| Stock Awards | ||||
Name |
|
Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested(1) |
|||
Roger S. Penske |
| 440,726 | (2) | $21,626,425 | ||
Chief Executive Officer |
| |||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
81,586 | (3) | 4,003,425 | |||
President |
||||||
David K. Jones |
| 28,720 | (4) | 1,409,290 | ||
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| |||||
Calvin C. Sharp |
12,353 | (5) | 606,162 | |||
Executive Vice President Human Resources |
||||||
Shane M. Spradlin |
| 24,421 | (6) | 1,198,338 | ||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary |
| |||||
|
|
(1) Market value is based upon the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2014 ($49.07). |
||||
(2) These restricted shares vest as follows: |
||||
June 1, 2015 133,596 |
June 1, 2018 66,384 | |||
June 1, 2016 115,306 |
June 1, 2019 34,386 | |||
June 1, 2017 91,054 |
||||
(3) These restricted shares vest as follows: |
||||
June 1, 2015 23,255 |
June 1, 2018 14,066 | |||
June 1, 2016 20,724 |
June 1, 2019 6,739 | |||
June 1, 2017 16,802 |
||||
(4) These restricted shares vest as follows: |
||||
June 1, 2015 9,323 |
June 1, 2017 6,975 | |||
June 1, 2016 8,359 |
June 1, 2018 4,063 | |||
(5) These restricted shares vest as follows: |
||||
June 1, 2015 3,873 |
June 1, 2017 3,025 | |||
June 1, 2016 3,705 |
June 1, 2018 1,750 | |||
(6) The restricted shares vest as follows: |
||||
June 1, 2015 7,198 |
June 1, 2017 6,464 | |||
June 1, 2016 7,099 |
June 1, 2018 3,660 |
34
Option Exercises and Stock Vested During 2014
|
| Stock Awards | |||||
Name |
|
Number of Shares acquired on Vesting (#) |
|
Value Realized On Vesting ($) |
|||
|
|||||||
Roger S. Penske |
| 159,786 | | 7,433,245 | |||
Chief Executive Officer |
| | |||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. |
20,625 | 959,475 | |||||
President |
|||||||
David K. Jones |
| 5,905 | | 274,701 | |||
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
| | |||||
Calvin C. Sharp |
3,572 | 166,169 | |||||
Executive Vice President Human Resources |
|||||||
Shane M. Spradlin |
| 6,150 | | 286,098 | |||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary |
| |
Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Our executive officers are not eligible to participate in any defined benefit or non-qualified deferred compensation plans.
"Golden Parachutes" or Termination/Change in Control Payments
None of our executive officers have been provided an employment agreement, nor are they entitled to any pre-arranged severance compensation. With respect to a change in control, none of our current executive officers have been guaranteed any change of control payments, however, certain of our outstanding restricted stock grants provide that in the event of a change of control the award will vest. Based on a closing stock price of $50.56 on March 2, 2015, the following number of shares would vest assuming a change of control occurred on that date: Roger Penske 275,498 shares ($13,929,179), Robert Kurnick 53,612 shares ($2,710,623) David Jones 25,845 shares ($1,306,723), Calvin Sharp 11,203 shares ($566,424), Shane Spradlin 23,321 shares ($1,179,110).
The Board of Directors believes that its members should receive a mix of cash and equity compensation, with the option to receive all compensation in the form of equity. The Board of Directors approves changes to director compensation only upon the recommendation of the Compensation and Management Development Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors. Although all of our directors are eligible for our charitable donation matching program discussed below, only those directors who are not our employees are eligible for director compensation.
Annual Fee and Stock Award. Each non-employee director receives an annual fee of $40,000, except for audit committee members, who receive $45,000. Committee
chairpersons receive an
additional $5,000. These fees are payable, at the option of each non-employee director, in cash or common stock valued on the date of receipt (generally in the fourth quarter of the year of service).
Our non-employee directors also receive an annual grant of 4,000 shares of stock.
35
Option to Defer Receipt until Termination of Board Service. Under our Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, the annual fee and equity awards earned by our
non-employee directors may be deferred in either cash (for the
annual fee) and/or deferred stock. Each deferred stock unit is equal in value to a share of common stock, and ultimately will be paid in cash after a director retires. These stock units do not have
voting rights, but do receive dividends in the form of additional stock units which are credited to the director's account on the date dividends are paid. All cash fees deferred are held in our
general funds, and interest on such deferred fees is credited to the director's account at the then current U.S. 90-day Treasury bill rate on a quarterly basis.
Charitable Donation Matching Program. All directors are eligible to participate in a charitable matching gift program. Under this program, in 2014 we matched up to
$50,000 per year in contributions by
each director to institutions qualified as tax-exempt organizations under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and other institutions approved at the discretion of management. We may decline to
match any contribution to an institution with goals that are incompatible with ours, or due to conflicts with our director independence policy. This program is not available for matching of political
contributions. While the contributions are directed by our directors, we retain the tax deduction for matching contributions paid by us.
Other Amounts. As part of our director continuing education program, each director is eligible to be reimbursed by us for the cost and expenses relating to one
education seminar
per year. These amounts are excluded from the table below. Each non-employee director is also entitled to the use of a company vehicle, including the cost of routine maintenance and repairs and
company-sponsored automobile insurance relating to that vehicle. All directors are also entitled to reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their travel to, and
attendance at, meetings of the Board of Directors or its committees. Because we expect attendance at all meetings, and a substantial portion of the Board of Directors' work is done outside of formal
meetings, we do not pay meeting fees.
2014 Director Compensation Table
Our directors serving in 2014 who are also our employees (Messrs. Kurnick, Namba, Penske and Sasaki) receive no additional compensation for serving as directors, though they are eligible for the charitable matching program noted above.
Name |
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) |
|
Stock Awards(2) |
|
All Other Compensation | | Total | |||||
|
|||||||||||||
John D. Barr |
$ | 45,000 | $ | 191,640 | $ | 67,138 | (3) | $ | 303,778 | ||||
Michael R. Eisenson |
50,000 | 191,640 | 75,968 | (4) | 317,608 | ||||||||
William J. Lovejoy |
| 40,000 | | 191,640 | | 74,411 | (5) | | 306,051 | ||||
Kimberly J. McWaters |
50,000 | 191,640 | 65,436 | (6) | 307,076 | ||||||||
Lucio A. Noto |
| 40,000 | | 191,640 | | 74,987 | (7) | | 306,627 | ||||
Greg Penske |
26,740 | (8) | 191,640 | | 218,380 | ||||||||
Sandra A. Pierce |
| 40,000 | | 191,640 | | 57,805 | (9) | | 289,445 | ||||
Ronald G. Steinhart |
45,000 | 191,640 | 68,361 | (10) | 305,001 | ||||||||
H. Brian Thompson |
| 45,000 | | 191,640 | | 106,364 | (11) | | 343,004 |
36
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 10, 2015 by (1) each person known to us to own more than five percent of our common stock, (2) each of our directors, (3) each of our named executive officers and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
"Beneficial ownership" is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares, including shares of restricted but unvested stock. The percentage of ownership is based on 90,324,351 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 10, 2015. Unless otherwise indicated in a footnote, each person identified in the table below has sole voting
37
and dispositive power with respect to the common stock beneficially owned by that person and none of the shares are pledged as security.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Economic Ownership(1) |
|
Beneficial Ownership(2) | | Percent | ||||
|
||||||||||
Principal Stockholders |
| | | |||||||
Penske Corporation(3) |
| 30,604,460 | | 30,604,460 | | 33.9% | ||||
2555 Telegraph Road, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0954 |
| | | |||||||
Mitsui(4) |
15,559,217 | 15,559,217 | 17.2% | |||||||
1-3, Marunouchi, 1-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan 100-8631 |
||||||||||
|
| | | |||||||
Current Directors and Nominees |
| | | |||||||
John D. Barr |
| 36,637 | | 7,000 | | * | ||||
Michael R. Eisenson |
81,607 | 81,607 | * | |||||||
Robert H. Kurnick, Jr.(5) |
| 96,152 | | 96,152 | | * | ||||
William J. Lovejoy |
71,688 | 16,000 | * | |||||||
Kimberly J. McWaters |
| 35,594 | | 18,924 | | * | ||||
Lucio A. Noto |
79,275 | 44,674 | * | |||||||
Greg Penske(6) |
| 29,420 | | 29,420 | | * | ||||
Roger S. Penske(7) |
31,487,613 | 31,487,613 | 34.9% | |||||||
Sandra A. Pierce |
| 11,867 | | 7,850 | | * | ||||
Kanji Sasaki |
0 | 0 | * | |||||||
Ronald G. Steinhart |
| 47,900 | | 47,900 | | * | ||||
H. Brian Thompson |
75,625 | 75,625 | * | |||||||
|
| | | |||||||
Officers Who Are Not Directors |
| | | |||||||
David K. Jones(8) |
| 38,118 | | 38,118 | | * | ||||
Calvin C. Sharp(9) |
34,815 | 34,815 | * | |||||||
Shane M. Spradlin(10) |
| 52,693 | | 52,693 | | * | ||||
All directors and named executive officers as a group (15 persons)(11) |
32,153,624 | 32,013,011 | 35.4% |
38
shares were deemed to be beneficially owned by Penske Corporation, its beneficial ownership would be 46,163,677 shares or 51.1%.
Our Board of Directors has adopted a written policy with respect to the approval of related party transactions. Under the policy, related party transactions valued over $5,000 must be approved by a majority of either the members of our Audit Committee or our disinterested Board members. Our Audit Committee approves all individual related party transactions valued below $1 million, all multiple-payment transactions valued below $5 million (such as a lease), and any transaction substantially similar to a prior year's transaction (regardless of amount). Our Board, by a vote of the disinterested directors, reviews and approves all other related party transactions. At each regularly scheduled meeting, our Audit Committee reviews any proposed new related party transactions for approval and reviews the status of previously approved transactions. Each of the transactions noted below was approved by our Board of Directors or Audit Committee pursuant to this policy.
Stockholders Agreement and Stock Purchase Agreement. Entities affiliated with Roger S. Penske, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, are parties to
a stockholders agreement described below.
Mr. Penske is also Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Penske Corporation, and, through entities affiliated with Penske Corporation, our largest stockholder. The parties to the
stockholders agreement are Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co, (USA), Inc. (collectively, "Mitsui"), Penske Corporation and Penske Automotive Holdings Corp.
(collectively the "Penske companies").
Pursuant to the stockholders agreement, the Penske companies agreed to vote their shares
39
for up to two directors who are representatives of Mitsui and Mitsui agreed to vote its shares for up to fourteen directors voted for by the Penske companies. In addition, the Penske companies agreed that if they transfer any of our shares of common stock, Mitsui would be entitled to "tag along" by transferring a pro rata amount of its shares upon similar terms and conditions, subject to certain limitations. This agreement terminates in 2024, or, if earlier, upon the mutual consent of the parties or when either party no longer owns any of our common stock.
Registration Rights Agreements. Both the Penske companies and Mitsui possess registration rights pursuant to which they are able on two remaining occasions each to
register all or part of our
common stock held by them, subject to specified limitations. They are also entitled to request inclusion of all or any part of their common stock in any registration of securities by us on
Forms S-1 or S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Other Related Party Interests. Several of our directors and officers are affiliated with Penske Corporation or related entities. Mr. Penske is a managing
member of Transportation
Resource Partners, a Penske affiliated organization that undertakes investments in transportation-related industries. Greg Penske, Roger Penske's son, is one of our directors. Robert H.
Kurnick, Jr., our President and a director, is also the President and a director of Penske Corporation. In 2014, we were reimbursed approximately five percent of the base salary of Shane
Spradlin, our General Counsel, by Penske Corporation to reflect his efforts on behalf of Penske Corporation affiliates. These employees or directors may receive salary, bonus or other compensation
from Penske Corporation or its affiliates unrelated to their service at Penske Automotive. Our director Lucio A. Noto is an investor in Transportation Resources Partners.
Penske Truck Leasing. We own a 9% interest in Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. ("PTL"), a leading provider of transportation services and supply chain
management. PTL operates and maintains approximately 205,000 vehicles and serves customers in North America, South America, Europe and Asia. Product lines include full-service leasing, contract
maintenance, commercial and consumer truck rental used truck sales, transportation and warehousing management and supply chain management. PTL is owned 41.1% by Penske Corporation, 9.0% by us and the
remaining 49.9% of PTL is owned by General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC").
Historically GECC provided PTL with a majority of its financing and in 2012 PTL refinanced all of its GECC indebtedness. As part of that refinancing in 2012, we and the other PTL partners created a new company ("Holdings"), which, together with GECC, co-issued $700.0 million of 3.8% senior unsecured notes due 2019 (the "Holdings Bonds"). GECC agreed to be a co-obligor of the Holdings Bonds in order to achieve lower interest rates. Additional capital contributions from the members may be required to fund interest and principal payments on the Holdings Bonds. We have agreed to indemnify GECC for 9.0% of any principal or interest that GECC is required to pay as co-obligor, and pay GECC an annual fee of approximately $950,000 for acting as co-obligor. The maximum amount of our obligations to GECC under this agreement are 9.0% of the required principal repayment due in 2019 (which is expected to be $63.1 million) and 9.0% of interest payments under the Holdings Bonds, plus fees and default interest, if any.
As part of the refinancing transactions in 2012, we entered into a limited liability company agreement of Holdings which extends through 2023. We have governance rights in Holdings typical of a minority investor and, in light of our indemnification requirements related to the Holdings Bonds noted above, we have the right to approve certain additional debt obligations before incurrence by Holdings to the extent such incurrence would affect our indemnification requirements, any change in Holdings' business activities and changes to the maturity, interest rate and principal amount of the Holdings Bonds. The agreement contains restrictions on our ability to transfer our interests similar to those in the existing and revised PTL partnership agreement discussed below.
40
The PTL partnership agreement provides us with specified distribution and governance rights and restricts our ability to transfer our interests. As a limited partner, we are entitled only to a limited number of rights, including the right to act as an observer at all meetings of PTL's Advisory Committee and a right to pro rata quarterly distributions equal to 50% of its consolidated net income. Further, we may only transfer our interests with the unanimous consent of the other partners or if we and Penske Corporation provide the remaining partners with a right of first refusal to acquire our interests at fair market value. We and Penske Corporation have also agreed that (1) in the event of any transfer by Penske Corporation of their partnership interests to a third party, we shall be entitled to "tag-along" by transferring a pro rata amount of our partnership interests on similar terms and conditions, and (2) Penske Corporation is entitled to a right of first refusal in the event of any transfer of our partnership interests.
The agreement, extends through 2023, and also allows GECC or Penske Corporation, beginning December 31, 2017, to give notice to require PTL to begin to effect an initial public offering of equity securities, subject to certain limitations, as soon as practicable after the first anniversary of the initial notice. The party that is not exercising this right may seek to find a third party to purchase all of the partnership interests from the exercising party or to propose another alternative to such equity offers. In connection with the right to cause PTL to conduct an initial public offering, the PTL partners have agreed to customary demand and piggyback registration rights.
In 2014, we received $11.6 million from PTL in pro rata cash distributions. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also serves as chairman of PTL, for which he is compensated by PTL. As a limited partner, we do not influence or control the amount of that compensation. In April, 2014, our Australian subsidiary Penske Transportation Group International contributed $2.3 million for a 45% interest in a joint venture with a PTL subsidiary to lease trucks in Australia and New Zealand. The joint venture combines our sales expertise in Australia with PTL's truck leasing experience. We entered into a shareholder's agreement that provides us with specified distribution and governance rights and restricts our ability to transfer our interests.
Other Transactions. From time to time, we pay and/or receive fees from Penske Corporation and its affiliates for services rendered in the normal course of business, including payments to third parties by Penske Corporation on our behalf which we then reimburse to them, payments to third parties made by us on behalf of Penske Corporation which they then reimburse to us, shared office expenses, shared employee expenses and payments relating to the use of aircraft from Penske Aviation, a subsidiary of Penske Corporation. These transactions are reviewed periodically by our Audit Committee and reflect the provider's cost or an amount mutually agreed upon by both parties. Aggregate payments relating to such transactions amounted to $7.3 million paid by us.
In June 2008, RP Automotive, an affiliate of Mr. Penske, Jr., the son of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, purchased two of our subsidiaries operating six franchises in California. In connection with these transactions, the former subsidiaries continue to lease certain fixed assets from us. One of the leases has a term expiring in December 2037 with annual rent of $289,000 per year (or $6.6 million over the remaining period), and the second lease has a term expiring in February 2027 with annual rent of $219,000 per year (or $2.7 million over the remaining period).
We and Penske Corporation and certain of its affiliates have entered into a joint insurance agreement which provides that, with respect to any joint insurance policies (such as our commercial crime insurance policies), any available coverage with respect to a loss shall be paid to each party as stipulated in the policies. In the event of losses that exceed the limit of liability for any policy or policy period, the total policy proceeds will be allocated based on the ratio of premiums paid.
We have entered into a license agreement with an affiliate of Penske Corporation for a license of the "Penske Automotive" name. This
41
agreement provides us with a perpetual license of the name "Penske Automotive" and related trade names so long as Penske Corporation and its affiliates own in excess of 20% of our outstanding stock and we adhere to the other terms of the license agreement.
We own 31% of a provider of outsourced vehicle management solutions ("PVS"). Penske Corporation and Penske Truck Leasing also own 15% and 17% interests in that company, respectively. We and the other investors entered into a stockholders agreement relating to this investment which, among other things, provides us with specified management rights and rights to purchase additional shares, and restricts our ability to transfer shares. We also entered into a management agreement which provides that we and other investors are to be paid ongoing pro rata management fees. In 2014, we incurred $212,034 of compensation expense for the chief executive officer of PVS, who also provides consulting services to us.
From time to time, we enter into arrangements with Penske Truck Leasing and/or other Penske Corporation affiliates and third party vendors in order to achieve the benefits of scale or synergy opportunities as between the companies. These arrangements are reviewed by the Board in accordance with our policy noted above. For example, we aggregate several Penske entities in connection with sourcing certain telecommunications services to achieve the benefits of scale. In addition, we have a preferred arrangement with Shell Oil whereby we purchase targeted amounts of lubricants, fuel and other products on competitive terms to the Company.
In 2014, we had investments in two companies controlled by Transportation Resource Partners ("TRP"), an organization discussed above: Fleetwash, a mobile vehicle washing company and NPA, an auctioneer of powersport vehicles. In 2014, we paid $180,660 to NPA for hosting services in connection with our used vehicle auctions. In April 2014, we and the other investors sold our interests in Fleetwash on the same financial terms as TRP, generating $4.2 million in net proceeds. We have a continuing 7% ownership interest in NPA which is also owned 7% by Mitsui with TRP having a controlling interest.
In June 2013, we acquired a 27% interest in Around-The Clock Freightliner, which we have renamed Penske Commercial Vehicles US ("PCV US"), a retailer of Daimler branded medium, heavy and light-duty trucks in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Tennessee. TRP simultaneously (in 2013) acquired a controlling interest in this company on the same financial terms as our investment. We and several other investors, including TRP entered into a limited liability company agreement relating to this investment which, among other things, provided us with specified management rights, including the right to appoint one of seven directors, and rights to purchase additional shares, and restricted our ability to transfer shares. We guaranteed $1.5 million of PCV US's indebtedness (along with the other investors) and were also entitled to a management fee with respect to our ongoing advisory services provided to PCV US, which totaled $175,310 in 2014.
In November 2014, we purchased all of the PCV US ownership interests held by TRP for $58.8 million, as well as the ownership interests of other existing investors which resulted in our owning 91% of the total PCV US interests. As part of those transactions, we entered into a revised limited liability company agreement with the remaining management investors and terminated the prior agreement, including the right to management fees, and guaranteed substantially all of PCV US's indebtedness.
In 2014, we purchased $671,759 in vehicle window solar film for sale at our dealerships from Commonwealth Laminating & Coating, Inc., d/b/a SunTek, a company controlled by TRP, until its sale by TRP in December 2014. In 2014, we purchased $1.1 million in vehicle transportation services from United Road Services, a national auto transport company ("URS"). URS is indirectly majority owned by Charlesbank Capital Partners, an affiliate of Michael Eisenson, one of our directors. TRP and Roger Penske collectively own approximately 8% of URS.
42
Our officers, directors and their affiliates periodically purchase, lease or sell vehicles and parts or purchase graphic automotive services from us at fair market value. This includes purchases and sales of trucks, logistics and other services and parts as between our subsidiaries and those of PTL, as well as purchases by our commercial vehicle businesses of $1.2 million of truck lighting products from Truck Lite Company, a subsidiary of Penske Corporation. Additionally, we hire automotive technicians who have graduated from Universal Technical Institute ("UTI"), a provider of technical education, whose Chief Executive Officer, Kimberly McWaters, is one of our directors. We make no payments to UTI relating to the hiring of these graduates and hire them on the same terms as other employers.
In 2014, Mr. Namba, one of our former board members through July 2014, received $200,201 in total compensation relating to his service as Senior Vice President International Business Development, including a tax allowance of $9,492 relating to $19,940 of non-cash compensation. Additionally, Mr. Sasaki, one of our board members since July 2014, received $64,424 in total compensation relating to his service as Senior Vice President International Business Development, including a tax allowance of $1,740 relating to $7,299 of non-cash compensation. Messrs. Namba and Sasaki are employees of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (Japan). To the extent their salaries exceed or is less than an amount set annually by Mitsui, they make or receive payments to/from Mitsui intended to mitigate the effect of exchange rate changes.
An entity (the "Investor") controlled by one of our directors, Lucio A. Noto, owns a 17.8% interest in one of our subsidiaries, UAG Connecticut I, LLC, pursuant to an agreement which entitles the Investor to 20% of the operating profits of UAG Connecticut I. This agreement also provides the Investor with the right to appoint one of three directors, as well as "tag-along rights" in the event we intend to sell our interest in UAG Connecticut I. We have a right of first refusal with respect to any potential sale by the Investor of its interest. From time to time, we provide UAG Connecticut I with working capital and other debt financing. The Investor also paid $379,000 to us in 2014 pursuant to its option to purchase up to a 20% interest in UAG Connecticut I. In addition, UAG Connecticut I makes periodic pro rata distributions, pursuant to which the Investor was paid $1.2 million during 2014. A separate entity controlled by Mr. Noto (the "Additional Investor"), owns a 20% interest in our subsidiary that owns Mercedes-Benz of Greenwich. From time to time, we provide Mercedes-Benz of Greenwich with working capital and other debt financing and expect to make periodic pro rata distributions from Mercedes-Benz of Greenwich to the Investor which totaled $492,000 in 2014. We have entered into an operating agreement that provides rights and obligations similar as those described above with respect to UAG Connecticut I. Mr. Noto also has an indirect ownership interest in Putnam Leasing Company, which is a provider of leasing for premium vehicles. In 2014, Putnam Leasing purchased $11.7 million in automotive contracts from us, representing 61 vehicles, to offer leasing to our customers.
43
PAG 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
8:00 a.m.
Eastern Daylight Time, May 5, 2015
Penske Automotive Group
2555 Telegraph Road
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302
Voting in Person at the Meeting
We encourage you to submit proxies in advance by telephone, by Internet or by mail. You may also vote in person at the annual meeting instead, or may execute a proxy designating a representative to vote for you at the meeting. If your PAG shares are held for you in a brokerage, bank or other institutional account, you must obtain a proxy from that entity and bring it with you to hand in with your ballot in order to be able to vote your shares at the meeting.
Admission
You will be asked to verify proof of ownership of PAG stock before being admitted to our annual meeting. If you hold shares indirectly through a bank or brokerage firm, please bring a recent statement to verify your ownership. We reserve the right to deny admission to anyone who cannot verify he or she is one of our stockholders. Cameras and recording devices will not be permitted.
Proxies are solicited by or on behalf of our Board of Directors. We will bear the cost of this solicitation. In addition to the solicitation of the proxies by mail, some of our officers and regular employees, without extra remuneration, may solicit proxies personally, or by telephone or otherwise. In addition, we will make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxies and proxy material to their principals, and we will reimburse them for their expenses in forwarding soliciting materials, which are not expected to exceed an aggregate of $10,000.
We will provide without charge to each of our stockholders, on the written request of such stockholder, a copy of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and any of the other documents referenced herein. Copies can be obtained from Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Investor Relations, 2555 Telegraph Road, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302-0954 (248-648-2500) or (866-715-5289).
Dated: March 11, 2015
44
Appendix A 2015 Equity Incentive Plan
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
1. Purpose. The purpose of this 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is to further the long term stability and financial success of Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (the "Company") by (a) attracting and retaining key employees, members of the Board of Directors and other contributors to the Company through the use of equity and cash incentives and (b) encouraging equity ownership in the Company by members of the Company's Board of Directors and management. It is believed that ownership of Company Stock will stimulate the efforts of those Participants upon whose judgment and interest the Company is and will be dependent for the successful conduct of its business. It is also believed that awards granted under this Plan will strengthen their desire to remain with the Company and will further align those Participants' interests with those of the Company's shareholders.
2. Definitions. As used in the Plan, the following terms have the meanings indicated:
A-1
A-2
A-3
within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code), or at any time thereafter (but only to the extent the exercise of such authority after such period would not cause the Performance Compensation Awards granted to any Participant for the Performance Period to fail to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Code), in its sole discretion, to adjust or modify the calculation of a Performance Goal for such Performance Period to the extent permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code.
A-4
entity will be considered a Subsidiary for purposes of the Plan only if the Committee determines that the entity should be so considered. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, Subsidiary shall be limited to a subsidiary within the meaning of Code Section 424(f).
3. General. Awards may be granted under the Plan in the form of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Company Stock Awards, Incentive Awards and Restricted Awards, with any of the foregoing being designated as Performance Compensation Awards. Options granted under the Plan may be Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options. The provisions of the Plan referring to Rule 16b-3 shall apply only to Participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Act.
4. Number of Shares of Company Stock and Cash Compensation Cap.
A-5
combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the shares of Company Stock authorized for grant under the Plan; provided that Awards using such available shares shall not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and shall only be made to individuals who were not Participants prior to such acquisition or combination.
5. Eligibility.
6. Company Stock Awards, Incentive Awards and Restricted Awards.
(i)None of such shares or units may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise encumbered or disposed of until the restrictions on such shares or units shall have lapsed or shall have been removed pursuant to paragraph (h) or (i) below.
A-6
(ii)Unless specified otherwise in a Participant's Restricted Award Agreement, the restrictions on such shares or units must remain in effect for a period of no less than one year from the Date of Grant, except as provided under paragraph (h) or (i) in the case of Disability, death or a Change in Control.
(iii)Unless specified otherwise in a Participant's Restricted Award Agreement, if a Participant ceases to be employed by the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company, or otherwise ceases employment with or otherwise ceases to be a Company Contributor, as applicable, the Participant shall forfeit to the Company any Restricted Awards, the restrictions on which shall not have lapsed or shall not have been removed pursuant to paragraph (h) or (i) below, on the date such Participant shall cease to be so employed, etc.
(iv)The Committee may establish such other restrictions on such shares or units that the Committee deems appropriate, including, without limitation, events of forfeiture and performance requirements for the vesting of awards.
A-7
7. Options.
(i)No Incentive Stock Option may be exercised after the first to occur of:
A-8
(ii)Except as otherwise provided in this Section, no Incentive Stock Option may be exercised unless the Participant is employed by the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company at the time of the exercise and has been so employed at all times since the Date of Grant. If a Participant's employment is terminated other than by reason of death or Disability at a time when the Participant holds an Incentive Stock Option that is exercisable (in whole or in part), the Participant may exercise any or all of the then exercisable portion of the Incentive Stock Option (to the extent exercisable on the date of termination) within three months after the Participant's employment. If a Participant's employment is terminated by reason of Disability at a time when the Participant holds an Incentive Stock Option that is exercisable (in whole or in part), the Participant may exercise any or all of the then exercisable portion of the Incentive Stock Option (to the extent exercisable on the date of Disability) within one year after the Participant's termination of employment. If a Participant's employment is terminated by reason of death at a time when the Participant holds an Incentive Stock Option that is exercisable (in whole or in part), the then exercisable portion of the Incentive Stock Option may be exercised (to the extent exercisable on the date of death) within one year after the Participant's death by the person to whom the Participant's rights under the Incentive Stock Option shall have passed by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
(iii)An Incentive Stock Option, by its terms, shall be exercisable in any calendar year only to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the Date of Grant) of the Company Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time during the calendar year does not exceed $100,000 (the "Limitation Amount"). Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan and all other plans of the Company and any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company shall be aggregated for purposes of determining whether the Limitation Amount has been exceeded. The Committee may impose such conditions as it deems appropriate on an Incentive Stock Option to ensure that the foregoing requirement is met. If Incentive Stock Options that first become exercisable in a calendar year exceed the Limitation Amount, the excess Options will be treated as Nonstatutory Stock Options to the extent permitted by law.
A-9
8. Stock Appreciation Rights.
(i)Stock Appreciation Rights shall entitle the Participant, upon exercise of all or any part of the Stock Appreciation Rights, to surrender to the Company unexercised that portion of the underlying Option relating to the same number of shares of Company Stock as is covered by the Stock Appreciation Rights (or the portion of the Stock Appreciation Rights so exercised) and to receive in exchange from the Company an amount equal to the excess of (x) the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the Company Stock covered by the surrendered portion of the underlying Option over (y) the exercise price of the Company Stock covered by the surrendered portion of the underlying Option, which shall be no less than 100% of Fair Market Value of the covered Company Stock on the Date of Grant. The Committee may limit the amount that the Participant will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right.
(ii)Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right and surrender of the related portion of the underlying Option, the Option, to the extent surrendered, shall not thereafter be exercisable.
(iii)The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Stock Appreciation Rights in connection with Options which by their terms become fully exercisable upon a Change of Control, which Stock Appreciation Rights shall only be exercisable following a Change of Control. The underlying Option may provide that such Stock Appreciation Rights shall be payable solely in cash. The terms of the underlying Option shall provide that the value of the Company Stock shall be calculated based on the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock on the day of exercise.
(iv)Subject to any further conditions upon exercise imposed by the Committee, a Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable only to the extent that the related Option is exercisable, and shall expire no later than the date on which the related Option expires.
(v)A Stock Appreciation Right may only be exercised at a time when the Fair Market Value of the Company Stock covered by the Stock Appreciation Right exceeds the exercise price of the Company Stock covered by the underlying Option.
(i)Stock Appreciation Rights shall entitle the Participant, upon the exercise of all or any part of the Stock Appreciation Rights, to receive from the Company an amount equal to the excess of (x) the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the Company Stock covered by the surrendered Stock Appreciation Rights over (y) the Fair Market Value on the Date of Grant of the Company Stock covered by the Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may limit the
A-10
amount that the Participant may be entitled to receive upon exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right.
(ii)Stock Appreciation Rights shall be exercisable, in whole or in part, at such times as the Committee shall specify in the Participant's Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement.
9. Method of Exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.
As an alternative to making a cash payment to the Company to satisfy Applicable Withholding
A-11
Taxes if the Option or Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement so provides, or the Committee by separate action so provides, a Participant may elect to (i) deliver shares of Company Stock or (ii) have the Company retain that number of shares of Company Stock that would satisfy all or a specified portion of the Applicable Withholding Taxes. Any such election shall be made only in accordance with procedures established by the Committee.
10. Performance Compensation Awards.
(i)Condition to Receipt of Payment. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, a Participant must be employed by the Company or Parent, or remain an employee of or otherwise be a Company Contributor, as applicable, on the last day of a Performance Period to be eligible for payment related to a Performance Compensation Award for such Performance Period.
A-12
(ii)Limitation. A Participant shall be eligible to receive payment related to a Performance Compensation Award only to the extent that: (A) the Performance Goals for such period are achieved; and (B) the Performance Formula as applied against such Performance Goals determines that all or some portion of such Participant's Performance Compensation Award has been earned for the Performance Period.
(iii)Certification. Following the completion of a Performance Period, the Committee shall review and approve whether, and to what extent, the Performance Goals for the Performance Period have been achieved and, if so, calculate and approve the amount of the Performance Compensation Awards earned for the period based upon the Performance Formula. The Committee shall then determine the actual size of each Participant's Performance Compensation Award for the Performance Period and, in so doing, may apply Negative Discretion in accordance with Section 10(d)(iv) hereof, if and when it deems appropriate.
(iv)Use of Discretion. In determining the actual size of an individual Performance Compensation Award for a Performance Period, the Committee may reduce or eliminate the amount of the Performance Compensation Award earned under the Performance Formula in the Performance Period through the use of Negative Discretion if, in its sole discretion, such reduction or elimination is appropriate. The Committee shall not have the discretion to (A) grant or provide payment related to a Performance Compensation Award for a Performance Period if the Performance Goals for such Performance Period have not been attained or (B) increase a Performance Compensation Award above the maximum amount payable under Section 10(d)(vi) of the Plan.
(v)Timing of Award Payments. Unless otherwise provided in a Performance Compensation Award Agreement or pursuant to an irrevocable deferral election made in compliance with Code Section 409A, Performance Compensation Awards granted for a Performance Period shall be paid to Participants as soon as administratively practicable following completion of the approvals required by this Section 10 but in no event later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the last day of the applicable Performance Period.
(vi)Maximum Award Payable. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Plan to the contrary, the maximum Performance Compensation Award payable to any one Participant under the Plan for a single calendar year is subject to the limits in Sections 4(b) and 4(g).
11. Nontransferability of Awards. Except as described below or as otherwise determined by the Committee in a Participant's Award agreement, no Award shall be transferable by a Participant except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and an Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercised only by a Participant during the lifetime of the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant may assign or transfer an Award that is not an Incentive Stock Option with the consent of the Committee to a family member (or trust or other entity for the benefit of the Participant or the Participant's family members), without consideration (each transferee thereof, a "Permitted Assignee"); provided that any such Permitted Assignee shall be bound by and subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and transferred Award and shall execute an Award Agreement satisfactory to the Company evidencing such obligations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant who transfers an Award also shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan.
12. Effective Date of the Plan. This Plan shall become effective as of May 5th, 2015, subject to the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy at a duly held meeting of shareholders of the Company.
A-13
13. Termination, Modification, Change. If not sooner terminated by the Board, this Plan shall terminate at the close of business on May 5th, 2020. No Awards shall be granted under the Plan after its termination. The Board may terminate the Plan or may amend the Plan in such respects as it shall deem advisable; provided that, if and to the extent required by the Code or Rule 16b-3, no change shall be made that increases the total number of shares of Company Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan (except pursuant to Section 14), expands the class of persons eligible to receive Awards, or materially increases the benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan unless such change is authorized by the shareholders of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may unilaterally amend the Plan and Awards as it deems appropriate to ensure compliance with Rule 16b-3 and to cause Awards to meet the requirements of the Code, including Code Sections 162(m), 422, 409A and regulations thereunder. Except as provided in the preceding sentence, a termination or amendment of the Plan shall not, without the consent of the Participant, adversely affect a Participant's rights under an Award previously granted to such Participant.
14. Change in Capital Structure.
15. Administration of the Plan. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall be the full Board or a committee appointed by the Board, consisting of not less than two members of the Board. Subject to paragraph (f) below, a committee appointed by the Board shall be the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board unless the Board shall appoint another committee to administer the Plan. The Committee shall have general authority to impose any limitation or condition
A-14
upon an Award that the Committee deems appropriate to achieve the objectives of the Award and the Plan and, without limitation and in addition to powers set forth elsewhere in the Plan, shall have the following specific authority:
A-15
resolutions, not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as may be adopted from time to time by the Board.
16. Notice. All notices and other communications required or permitted to be given under this Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally or mailed first class, postage prepaid, as follows:
17. Shareholder Rights. No Participant shall be deemed to be the holder of, or to have any of the rights of a holder with respect to, any shares of Company Stock subject to an Award unless otherwise stated herein or until such Participation has satisfied all requirements under the terms of the Award.
18. No Employment or Other Service Rights. Nothing in the Plan or any instrument executed or Award granted under the Plan shall confer upon any Participant any right to continue to serve the Company (or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company) in the capacity in effect at the time the Award was granted or shall affect the right of the Company (or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company) to terminate the employment or services of a Participant with or without notice and with or without cause.
A-16
19. Interpretation. The terms of the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to conflict of law provisions at any jurisdiction. The terms of this Plan are subject to all present and future regulations and rulings of the Secretary of the Treasury or his or her delegate relating to the qualification of Incentive Stock Options under the Code. If any provision of the Plan conflicts with any such regulation or ruling, then that provision of the Plan shall be void and of no effect. As to all Incentive Stock Options and all Nonstatutory Stock Options with an exercise price of at least 100% of Fair Market Value of the Company Stock on the Date of Grant, this Plan shall be interpreted for such Options to be excluded from applicable employee remuneration for purposes of Code Section 162(m).
20. Compliance with Code Section 409A.
21. Compliance with Code Section 162(m). To the extent the Committee issues any Award that is intended to be exempt from the deduction limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may, without shareholder or grantee approval, amend the Plan or the relevant Award Agreement retroactively or prospectively to the extent it determines necessary in order to comply with any subsequent clarification of Section 162(m) of the Code required to preserve the Company's federal income tax deduction for compensation paid pursuant to any such Award.
22. Clawback. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Plan, any Award that is subject to recovery under any law, government regulation or Stock Exchange listing requirement, will be subject to such deductions and clawback as may be required to be made pursuant to such law, government regulation or stock exchange listing requirement (or any policy adopted by the Company pursuant to any such law, government regulation or Stock Exchange listing requirement) and in compliance with Code Section 409A.
23. Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have, the members of the Committee shall be indemnified by the Company against the reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and necessarily incurred in connection with the defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in connection with any appeal therein, to which they or any of them may be a party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan or any Award granted hereunder, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by the Board) or paid by the Board in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except in relation to matters as to which it shall be determined in such action, suit or
A-17
proceeding that such Committee member has acted in bad faith; provided, however, that within sixty (60) days after receipt of notice of institution of any such action, suit or proceeding, a Committee member shall offer the Company in writing the opportunity, at its own cost, to handle and defend the same.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, this instrument has been executed as of the 5th day of May 2015.
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC | ||
By: |
Executive Vice President Human Resources |
A-18
Form of Proxy Card Penske Automotive Group, Inc. IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Proxy Penske Automotive Group, Inc. PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby revokes all prior proxies and appoints Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. and Shane M. Spradlin and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution, to vote on behalf of the undersigned the same number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Penske Automotive Group, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 5, 2015 at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, at our corporate headquarters, 2555 Telegraph Road, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof, on any matter properly coming before the meeting, and specifically the matters described on the reverse side hereof. THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, IT WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES NAMED HEREIN, FOR APPROVAL OF OUR 2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN, FOR RATIFICATION OF OUR AUDITORS, FOR APPROVAL OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION, AND ACCORDING TO THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY POSTPONEMENTS OR ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF. THE PROPOSALS HEREIN ARE PROPOSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE C Non-Voting Items Change of Address Please print your new address below. Comments Please print your comments below. Meeting Attendance Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. |
Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 5, 2015. Vote by Internet Go to www.envisionreports.com/pag Or scan the QR code with your smartphone Follow the steps outlined on the secured website Vote by telephone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A Proposals The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the following proposals: 1. Election of Directors: For Withhold 01 John D. Barr 02 Michael R. Eisenson 03 Robert H. Kurnick, Jr. 04 William J. Lovejoy 05 Kimberly J. McWaters 06 Lucio A. Noto 07 Roger S. Penske 08 Greg Penske 09 Sandra E. Pierce 10 Kanji Sasaki 11 Ronald G. Steinhart 12 H. Brian Thompson For Against Abstain 2. Approval of our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. 3. Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys independent auditing firm for the year ending December 31, 2015. 4. Approval, by non-binding vote, of executive compensation. 5. Transaction of such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof. B Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below. Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please keep signature within the box. / / IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. |