ek10qsept2008.htm
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X] Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
or
[ ] Transition
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the transition period from ___ to ___
Commission
File Number 1-87
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW
JERSEY
|
16-0417150
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
343
STATE STREET, ROCHESTER, NEW YORK
|
14650
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code: 585-724-4000
_____________
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
"accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated
filer [X] Accelerated
filer [ ] Non-accelerated
filer [ ] Smaller
reporting company [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Title of each Class
|
Number of shares Outstanding
at
October 24, 2008
|
Common
Stock, $2.50 par value
|
268,460,335
|
|
|
|
|
Eastman
Kodak Company
Form
10-Q
September
30, 2008
Table
of Contents
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
2,405 |
|
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Restructuring
costs, rationalization and other
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Other
operating expenses (income), net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before interest expense,
other
income
(charges), net and income taxes
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Other
income (charges), net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
(Loss)
earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
NET
EARNINGS
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
(1.03 |
) |
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of common shares used in basic net earnings (loss) per
share
|
|
|
283.1 |
|
|
|
287.8 |
|
|
|
286.2 |
|
|
|
287.6 |
|
Incremental
shares from assumed issuance of unvested share-based
awards
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Convertible
securities
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Number
of common shares used in diluted net earnings (loss) per
share
|
|
|
301.9 |
|
|
|
288.6 |
|
|
|
286.4 |
|
|
|
287.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
dividends paid per share
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
(in
millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
earnings at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
6,772 |
|
|
$ |
6,305 |
|
|
$ |
6,474 |
|
|
$ |
5,967 |
|
Net
earnings
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Cash
dividends
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Loss
from issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Retained
earnings at end of period
|
|
$ |
6,865 |
|
|
$ |
6,333 |
|
|
$ |
6,865 |
|
|
$ |
6,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
(in
millions)
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
2,947 |
|
Receivables,
net
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
Inventories,
net
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
6,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,482
and $5,516, respectively
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$ |
11,913 |
|
|
$ |
13,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and other current liabilities
|
|
$ |
3,006 |
|
|
$ |
3,794 |
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Accrued
income and other taxes
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
4,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
Pension
and other postretirement liabilities
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
7,536 |
|
|
|
10,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
Additional
paid in capital
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
6,865 |
|
|
|
6,474 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
10,343 |
|
|
|
8,793 |
|
Less:
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
5,764 |
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
$ |
11,913 |
|
|
$ |
13,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(758 |
) |
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Gain
on sales of businesses/assets
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Non-cash
restructuring and rationalization costs, asset impairments and other
charges
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
286 |
|
Provision
for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Decrease
(increase) in receivables
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Increase
in inventories
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(183 |
) |
Decrease
in liabilities excluding borrowings
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Other
items, net
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
Total
adjustments
|
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
Net
cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
(694 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
to properties
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
Net
proceeds from sales of businesses/assets
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Acquisitions,
net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Marketable
securities - sales
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Marketable
securities - purchases
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Net
cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Net
cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,335 |
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
2,292 |
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
repurchases
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds
from borrowings
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Repayment
of borrowings
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
Dividends
to shareholders
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Exercise
of employee stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
|
|
378 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
1,847 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
NOTE
1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited, and certain information
and footnote disclosures related thereto normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been omitted in accordance with Rule 10-01
of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared following the same
policies and procedures used in the preparation of the audited financial
statements and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the results of operations, financial
position and cash flows of Eastman Kodak Company and its subsidiaries (the
Company). The results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal
year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Certain
amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current
period presentation. Prior period reclassifications relate to changes
in the Company’s segment reporting structure and cost allocation methodologies
related to employee benefits and corporate expenses. Refer to Note
13, “Segment Information.”
CHANGE
IN ESTIMATE
During
2005, the Company performed an assessment of the expected industry-wide declines
in its traditional film and paper businesses. Based on this
assessment, the Company revised the useful lives in 2005 of its existing
production machinery and equipment from 3-20 years to 3-5 years and
manufacturing-related buildings from 10-40 years to 5-20 years.
In the
first quarter of 2008, the Company performed an updated analysis of expected
industry-wide declines in the traditional film and paper businesses and its
useful lives on related assets. This analysis indicated that the
assets will continue to be used in these businesses for a longer period than
previously anticipated. As a result, the Company revised the useful
lives of certain existing production machinery and equipment, and
manufacturing-related buildings effective January 1, 2008. These
assets, which were previously set to fully depreciate by mid-2010, are now being
depreciated with estimated useful lives ending from 2011 to 2015. The
change in useful lives reflects the Company’s estimate of future periods to be
benefited from the use of the property, plant, and equipment.
The
effect of this change in estimate for the three months ended September 30, 2008
was a reduction in depreciation expense of $26 million, $14 million of which has
been recognized in cost of goods sold and is a benefit to earnings from
continuing operations. In addition, $12 million of the reduction in
depreciation is capitalized as a reduction in inventories at September 30,
2008. The net impact of the change to earnings from continuing
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 is an increase of $26
million, or $.09 on a fully-diluted earnings per share basis. This
includes the $14 million of current quarter depreciation recognized in cost of
goods sold, plus $12 million of depreciation from the previous quarter-to-date
which was capitalized as a reduction in inventories at June 30, 2008, but was
recognized in cost of goods sold in the current quarter.
The
effect of this change in estimate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
was a reduction in depreciation expense of $81 million, $69 million of which has
been recognized in cost of goods sold, and $12 million of which is capitalized
as a reduction in inventories at September 30, 2008. The net impact
of this change is an increase in earnings from continuing operations for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $69 million, or $.24 on a fully-diluted
earnings per share basis.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB
Statement No. 157
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, "Fair Value
Measurements," which establishes a comprehensive framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. Specifically, this Statement sets forth a definition of
fair value, and establishes a hierarchy prioritizing the inputs to valuation
techniques, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets and liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs. The Statement defines levels within the hierarchy as
follows:
·
|
Level
1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date.
|
·
|
Level
2 inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1,
which are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly.
|
· |
Level
3 inputs are unobservable inputs. |
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, which delays the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually) until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact that the application of SFAS No. 157 to its
nonfinancial assets and liabilities will have on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The
Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and
liabilities as of January 1, 2008. There was no significant impact to
the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of this
adoption.
The
following table sets forth financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the respective
levels to which the fair value measurements are classified within the fair value
hierarchy as of September 30, 2008:
|
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
Total Financial Assets &
Liabilities
|
|
|
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
As of
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency forward contracts
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Silver
forward contracts
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency forward contracts
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
Silver
forward contracts
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values
for the Company’s forward contracts are determined based on the present value of
expected future cash flows considering the risks involved and using discount
rates appropriate for the duration of the contracts.
FASB
Statement No. 159
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," which permits entities to choose to
measure, on an item-by-item basis, specified financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for
which the fair value option has been elected are required to be reported in
earnings at each reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. The provisions of this
statement are required to be applied prospectively. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 159 in the first quarter of 2008. There was no
significant impact to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements from the
adoption of SFAS No. 159.
FASB
Statement No. 141R
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations,” a
revision to SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R
provides revised guidance for recognition and measurement of identifiable assets
and goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree at fair value. The Statement also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of a
business combination. SFAS No. 141R is required to be applied
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for the Company). The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No.
141R on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
FASB
Statement No. 160
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This
Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests
in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent. Specifically,
SFAS No. 160 requires the presentation of noncontrolling interests as equity in
the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, and separate identification
and presentation in the Consolidated Statement of Operations of net income
attributable to the entity and the noncontrolling interest. It also
establishes accounting and reporting standards regarding deconsolidation and
changes in a parent’s ownership interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for the Company). The
provisions of SFAS No. 160 are generally required to be applied prospectively,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which must be applied
retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
FASB
Statement No. 161
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” This Statement amends and expands the disclosure requirements
for derivative instruments and hedging activities, with the intent to provide
users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for, and how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15,
2008. The Company will comply with the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 161 beginning in the first quarter of 2009.
NOTE
2: RECEIVABLES, NET
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
$ |
1,438 |
|
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
Miscellaneous
receivables
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Total
(net of allowances of $95 and $114 as of September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)
|
|
$ |
1,833 |
|
|
$ |
1,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the
total trade receivable amounts of $1,438 million and $1,697 million as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $171
million and $266 million, respectively, are expected to be settled through
customer deductions in lieu of cash payments. Such deductions
represent rebates owed to the customer and are included in accounts payable and
other current liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position at each respective balance sheet date.
The
increase in miscellaneous receivables is primarily the result of the execution
of an amendment to an intellectual property licensing agreement during the
current quarter. Under the terms of this amendment, cash
consideration is to be received in 2009. Refer to Note 6, “Other
Long-Term Liabilities.”
NOTE
3: INVENTORIES, NET
|
|
As of
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished
goods
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
Work
in process
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
Raw
materials
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
4: GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
was $1,700 million and $1,657 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by
reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were as
follows:
(in
millions)
|
|
As
of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Film,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Photofinishing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital
Imaging
|
|
|
and
Entertainment
|
|
|
Graphic
Communications
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Purchase
accounting adjustments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Currency
translation adjustments
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Balance
as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
aggregate amount of goodwill additions of $24 million was attributable to $14
million for the purchase of Intermate A/S and $10 million for the purchase of
Design2Launch in the second quarter of 2008, both in the Graphic Communications
Group segment. Refer to Note 14: “Acquisitions.”
Due to
the realignment of the Kodak operating model and change in reporting structure,
as described in Note 13, “Segment Information,” effective January 1, 2008, the
Company reassigned goodwill to its reportable segments using a relative fair
value approach as required under SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets." Prior period amounts have been restated to reflect this
reassignment.
The gross
carrying amount and accumulated amortization by major intangible asset category
as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows:
(in
millions)
|
|
As
of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Amortization
Period
|
Technology-based
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
7
years
|
Customer-related
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
10
years
|
Other
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
9
years
|
Total
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
8
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Amortization
Period
|
Technology-based
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
7
years
|
Customer-related
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
10
years
|
Other
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
8
years
|
Total
|
|
$ |
689 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
$ |
362 |
|
8
years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the second quarter of 2008, the Company acquired Design2Launch and Intermate
A/S. The intangible assets of $4 million and $7 million,
respectively, related to these two acquisitions are included in the balances as
of September 30, 2008 above.
During
the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold its stake in Lucky Film Co., Ltd.
including its rights under a manufacturing exclusivity agreement, which resulted
in a decrease in the net intangible asset amount of approximately $25
million.
Amortization
expense related to purchased intangible assets for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $21 million and $27 million,
respectively. Amortization expense related to purchased intangible
assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $61 million and
$83 million, respectively.
Estimated
future amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets as of
September 30, 2008 is as follows (in millions):
2008
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
2009
|
|
|
76 |
|
2010
|
|
|
65 |
|
2011
|
|
|
41 |
|
2012
|
|
|
26 |
|
2013
and thereafter
|
|
|
57 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
5: INCOME TAXES
In June
of 2008, the Company received a tax refund from the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) of $581 million. The refund is related to the audit of
certain claims filed for tax years 1993-1998, and is composed of a refund of
past federal income taxes paid of $306 million and $275 million of interest
earned on the refund.
The
federal tax refund claim related primarily to a 1994 loss recognized on the
Company’s sale of stock of a subsidiary, Sterling Winthrop Inc., which was
originally disallowed under IRS regulations in effect at that
time. The IRS subsequently issued revised regulations that served as
the basis for this refund.
The
refund had a positive impact of $565 million on the Company’s net earnings for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Of the $565 million
increase in net earnings, $295 million relates to the 1994 sale of Sterling
Winthrop Inc., which is reflected in earnings from discontinued operations, net
of income taxes. The balance of $270 million, which represents interest, is
reflected in earnings from continuing operations. The difference
between the cash refund received of $581 million and positive net earnings
impact of $565 million represents incremental state tax expense incurred and the
release of an existing income tax receivable related to the refund.
The
Company’s income tax provision (benefit) and effective tax rate were as
follows:
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
Effective
tax rate
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
(28.0 |
)% |
|
|
(345.2 |
)% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes @ 35%
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
Difference
between tax at effective vs. statutory rate
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(160 |
) |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
three months ended September 30, 2008, the difference between the Company’s
recorded provision and the provision that would result from applying the U.S.
statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable
to: (1) earnings generated within the U.S. that were not taxed due to the
impact of valuation
allowances, (2) losses generated in certain jurisdictions outside the
U.S. that were not benefited due to the impact of valuation
allowances, (3) the mix of earnings from operations in certain
lower-taxed jurisdictions outside the U.S., and (4) adjustments for uncertain
tax positions and tax audits.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, the difference between the Company’s
recorded benefit and the provision that would result from applying the U.S.
statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to: (1) interest of $270
million earned on the IRS tax refund, (2) losses generated within the U.S. and
in certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. that were not benefited due to the
impact of valuation allowances, (3) the mix of earnings from operations in
certain lower-taxed jurisdictions outside the U.S., and (4) adjustments for
uncertain tax positions and tax audits.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2007, the difference between the Company’s
recorded benefit and the provision that would result from applying the U.S.
statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to: (1) losses generated in
certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. that were not benefited due to valuation
allowances, (2) the mix of earnings from operations in certain lower-taxed
jurisdictions outside the U.S., (3) adjustments for uncertain tax positions, and
(4) the impact of foreign legislative tax rate changes.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, the difference between the Company’s
recorded benefit and the benefit that would result from applying the U.S.
statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to: (1) losses generated in
certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. that were not benefited due to valuation
allowances, (2) the mix of earnings from operations in certain
lower-taxed jurisdictions outside the U.S., (3) adjustments for
uncertain tax positions and tax audits, and (4) the impact of foreign
legislative rate changes.
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded a tax
benefit in continuing operations associated with the realization of current year
losses in certain jurisdictions where it has historically had a valuation
allowance due to the recognition of the pre-tax gain in discontinued
operations.
NOTE
6: OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
royalty revenue from licensees
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
Non-current
tax-related liabilities
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Environmental
liabilities
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Deferred
compensation
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Asset
retirement obligations
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Other
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
reduction in deferred royalty revenue from licensees is primarily due to an
amendment of an intellectual property licensing agreement with an existing
licensee. Revenue related to this arrangement was previously being
recognized over the term of the original agreement. The amendment
relieved the Company of its continuing obligations that were to be performed
over the term of the previous agreement. This amendment also resulted
in the recognition of previously deferred royalty revenue offset by the
elimination of a long-term note receivable of approximately the same
amount. The terms of the amendment result in immediate recognition of
royalty revenue in addition to previously recognized revenue under the original
agreement. Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008
related to the amended agreement is $112 million net of fees and revenue
deferred under the amended agreement, the proceeds for which will be received in
2009.
The Other
component consists of other miscellaneous long-term liabilities that,
individually, are less than 5% of the total liabilities component in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, and therefore, have
been aggregated in accordance with Regulation S-X.
NOTE
7: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental
The
Company’s undiscounted accrued liabilities for future environmental
investigation, remediation, and monitoring costs are composed of the following
items:
|
|
As
of
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kodak
Park site, Rochester, NY
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
Other
operating sites
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Sites
associated with former operations
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Sites
associated with the non-imaging health business sold in
1994
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These
amounts are reported in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
Statement of Financial Position, as indicated in Note 6, “Other Long-Term
Liabilities.”
Cash
expenditures for the aforementioned investigation, remediation and monitoring
activities are expected to be incurred over the next twenty-seven years for
several of the sites. For these known environmental liabilities, the
accrual reflects the Company’s best estimate of the amount it will incur under
the agreed-upon or proposed work plans. The Company’s cost estimates
were determined using the ASTM Standard E 2137-06, "Standard Guide for
Estimating Monetary Costs and Liabilities for Environmental Matters," and have
not been reduced by possible recoveries from third parties. The
overall method includes the use of a probabilistic model which forecasts a range
of cost estimates for the remediation required at individual
sites. The projects are closely monitored and the models are reviewed
as significant events occur or at least once per year. The Company’s
estimate includes investigations, equipment and operating costs for remediation
and long-term monitoring of the sites. The Company does not believe
it is reasonably possible that the losses for the known exposures could exceed
the current accruals by material amounts.
The
Company is presently designated as a potentially responsible party (PRP) under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of
1980, as amended (the Superfund Law), or under similar state laws, for
environmental assessment and cleanup costs as the result of the Company’s
alleged arrangements for disposal of hazardous substances at eight Superfund
sites. With respect to each of these sites, the Company’s liability
is minimal. In addition, the Company has been identified as a PRP in
connection with the non-imaging health businesses in two active Superfund
sites. Numerous other PRPs have also been designated at these
sites. Although the law imposes joint and several liability on PRPs,
the Company’s historical experience demonstrates that these costs are shared
with other PRPs. Settlements and costs paid by the Company in
Superfund matters to date have not been material. Future costs are
also not expected to be material to the Company’s financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Estimates
of the amount and timing of future costs of environmental remediation
requirements are by their nature imprecise because of the continuing evolution
of environmental laws and regulatory requirements, the availability and
application of technology, the identification of presently unknown remediation
sites and the allocation of costs among the potentially responsible
parties. Based upon information presently available, such future
costs are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s competitive or
financial position. However, such costs could be material to results
of operations in a particular future quarter or year.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
The
Company has asset retirement obligations which primarily relate to asbestos
contained in buildings owned by the Company. In many of the countries
in which the Company operates, environmental regulations exist that require the
Company to handle and dispose of asbestos in a special manner if a building
undergoes major renovations or is demolished. Otherwise, the Company
is not required to remove the asbestos from its buildings. The
Company records a liability equal to the estimated fair value of its obligation
to perform asset retirement activities related to the asbestos, computed using
an expected present value technique, when sufficient information exists to
calculate the fair value. The Company does not have a liability
recorded related to each building that contains asbestos because the Company
cannot estimate the fair value of its obligation for certain buildings due to a
lack of sufficient information about the range of time over which the obligation
may be settled through demolition, renovation or sale of the
building. The Company’s asset retirement obligations are included
within other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position, as indicated in Note 6, “Other Long-Term
Liabilities.”
The
change in the Company's asset retirement obligations from December 31, 2007 to
September 30, 2008 was as follows:
(in
millions)
Asset
retirement obligations as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
Liabilities
incurred in the current period
|
|
|
7 |
|
Liabilities
settled in the current period
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Accretion
expense
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1 |
|
Asset
retirement obligations as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Commitments and Contingencies
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $134
million and surety bonds in the amount of $66 million primarily to ensure the
payment of possible casualty and workers’ compensation claims, environmental
liabilities, and to support various customs, tax and trade
activities.
The
Company’s Brazilian operations are involved in labor claims and governmental
assessments of indirect and other taxes in various stages of
litigation. The Company is disputing these matters and intends to
vigorously defend its position. Based on the opinion of legal
counsel, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will materially impact the Company’s results of operations, financial
position or cash flows. The Company routinely assesses all these
matters as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability in its
Brazilian operations, and records its best estimate of the ultimate loss in
situations where it assesses the likelihood of loss as probable.
The
Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits, claims,
investigations and proceedings, including commercial, customs, employment,
environmental, and health and safety matters, which are being handled and
defended in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company
is subject to various assertions, claims, proceedings and requests for
indemnification concerning intellectual property, including patent infringement
suits involving technologies that are incorporated in a broad spectrum of the
Company’s products. These matters are in various stages of
investigation and litigation and are being vigorously
defended. Although the Company does not expect that the outcome in
any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition or results of operations, litigation is
inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered or
settlements entered, that could adversely affect the Company’s operating results
or cash flow in a particular period. The Company routinely assesses
all its litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately
incurring a liability, and records its best estimate of the ultimate loss in
situations where it assesses the likelihood of loss as probable.
NOTE
8: GUARANTEES
The
Company guarantees debt and other obligations of certain
customers. The debt and other obligations are primarily due to banks
and leasing companies in connection with financing of customers' purchases of
product and equipment from the Company. As of September 30, 2008, the
following customer guarantees were in place:
(in
millions)
|
|
As
of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Maximum Amount
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
amounts due to banks and leasing companies
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
Other
third-parties
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
guarantees of customer debt and other obligations
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
guarantees for the third party debt, presented in the table above, mature
between 2008 and 2013. The customer financing agreements and related
guarantees typically have a term of 90 days for product and short-term equipment
financing arrangements, and up to five years for long-term equipment financing
arrangements. These guarantees would require payment from the Company
only in the event of default on payment by the respective debtor. In
some cases, particularly for guarantees related to equipment financing, the
Company has collateral or recourse provisions to recover and sell the equipment
to reduce any losses that might be incurred in connection with the
guarantees.
Eastman
Kodak Company (“EKC”) also guarantees debt owed to banks and other third parties
for some of its consolidated subsidiaries. The maximum amount
guaranteed is $517 million, and the outstanding debt under those guarantees,
which is recorded within the short-term borrowings and long-term debt, net of
current portion components in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position, is $187 million. These guarantees expire in 2009
through 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Company's $2.7 billion
Senior Secured Credit Agreement dated October 18, 2005, obligations under the
$2.7 billion Secured Credit Facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) and other
obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries to the Credit Facilities’
lenders are guaranteed.
During
the fourth quarter of 2007, EKC issued a guarantee to Kodak Limited (the
“Subsidiary”) and the Trustees (the “Trustees”) of the Kodak Pension Plan of the
United Kingdom (the “Plan”). Under this arrangement, EKC guarantees
to the Subsidiary and the Trustees the ability of the Subsidiary, only to the
extent it becomes necessary to do so, to (1) make contributions to the Plan to
ensure sufficient assets exist to make plan benefit payments, and (2) make
contributions to the Plan such that it will achieve full funded status by the
funding valuation for the period ending December 31, 2015. The
guarantee expires upon the conclusion of the funding valuation for the period
ending December 31, 2015 whereby the Plan achieves full funded status or
earlier, in the event that the Plan achieves full funded status for two
consecutive funding valuation cycles which are typically performed at least
every three years. The limit of potential future payments is
dependent on the funding status of the Plan as it fluctuates over the term of
the guarantee. Currently, the Plan’s local funding valuation is in
process and expected to be completed by March 2009. As of September
30, 2008, management believes that performance under this guarantee by EKC is
unlikely given expected investment performance and cash available at the Plan’s
sponsoring company, the Subsidiary, should future cash contributions be
needed. The funding status of the Plan is included in Pension and
other postretirement liabilities presented in the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position.
Indemnifications
The
Company issues indemnifications in certain instances when it sells businesses
and real estate, and in the ordinary course of business with its customers,
suppliers, service providers and business partners. Further, the
Company indemnifies its directors and officers who are, or were, serving at the
Company's request in such capacities. Historically, costs incurred to
settle claims related to these indemnifications have not been material to the
Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. Additionally, the fair value of the indemnifications that the
Company issued during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was not material to
the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Warranty
Costs
The
Company has warranty obligations in connection with the sale of its products and
equipment. The original warranty period is generally one year or
less. The costs incurred to provide for these warranty obligations
are estimated and recorded as an accrued liability at the time of
sale. The Company estimates its warranty cost at the point of sale
for a given product based on historical failure rates and related costs to
repair. The change in the Company's accrued warranty obligations
balance, which is reflected in accounts payable and other current liabilities in
the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, was as
follows:
(in
millions)
Accrued
warranty obligations as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
Actual
warranty experience during 2008
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
2008
warranty provisions
|
|
|
100 |
|
Accrued
warranty obligations as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company also offers its customers extended warranty arrangements that are
generally one year, but may range from three months to three years after the
original warranty period. The Company provides repair services and
routine maintenance under these arrangements. The Company has not
separated the extended warranty revenues and costs from the routine maintenance
service revenues and costs, as it is not practicable to do
so. Therefore, these revenues and costs have been aggregated in the
discussion that follows. Costs incurred under these arrangements for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 amounted to $133
million. The change in the Company's deferred revenue balance in
relation to these extended warranty and maintenance arrangements from December
31, 2007 to September 30, 2008, which is reflected in accounts payable and other
current liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position, was as follows:
(in
millions)
Deferred
revenue as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
New
extended warranty and maintenance arrangements in 2008
|
|
|
282 |
|
Recognition
of extended warranty and maintenance arrangement revenue in
2008
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
Deferred
revenue as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
9: RESTRUCTURING AND RATIONALIZATION LIABILITIES
The
Company has completed the cost reduction program that was initially announced in
January 2004, which was referred to as the “2004–2007 Restructuring
Program.” With the completion of the 2004-2007 Restructuring Program,
the Company has drastically reduced the amount and scope of workforce reduction
plans and exit and disposal activities. However, the Company
recognizes the need to continually rationalize its workforce and streamline its
operations to remain competitive in the face of an ever-changing business and
economic climate. These initiatives, referred to as ongoing
rationalization activities, began in the first quarter of 2008.
The
actual charges for restructuring and ongoing rationalization initiatives are
recorded in the period in which the Company commits to formalized restructuring
or ongoing rationalization plans, or executes the specific actions contemplated
by the plans and all criteria for liability recognition under the applicable
accounting guidance have been met.
Restructuring
and Ongoing Rationalization Reserve Activity
The
activity in the accrued balances and the non-cash charges and credits incurred
in relation to restructuring programs and ongoing rationalization activities for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exit
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
and
Inventory
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
Write-downs
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as of 12/31/07
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1
2008 charges
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Q1
2008 utilization/cash payments
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Q1
2008 other adjustments & reclasses
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Balance
as of 3/31/08
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
2008 charges
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Q2
2008 reversals
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Q2
2008 utilization/cash payments
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
Q2
2008 other adjustments & reclasses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Balance
as of 6/30/08
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3
2008 charges (1)
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Q3
2008 reversals
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Q3
2008 utilization/cash payments
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Q3
2008 other adjustments & reclasses (2)
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Balance
as of 9/30/08
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes
severance charges of $51 million, offset by net curtailment gains related
to these actions of $6 million.
|
(2)
Primarily related to foreign currency translation
adjustments.
|
The $52
million of charges, net of reversals, for the third quarter of 2008 includes $2
million of charges for accelerated depreciation and $2 million of charges for
inventory write-downs, which were reported in cost of goods sold in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The remaining costs incurred, net of reversals,
of $48 million were reported as restructuring costs, rationalization and other
in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The severance and exit costs reserves
require the outlay of cash, while long-lived asset impairments, accelerated
depreciation and inventory write-downs represent non-cash items.
The
charges, net of reversals, of $52 million recorded in the third quarter of 2008
included $6 million applicable to FPEG, $23 million applicable to CDG, $17
million applicable to GCG, and $6 million that was applicable to manufacturing,
research and development, and administrative functions, which are shared across
all segments.
As a
result of these initiatives, severance payments will be paid during periods
through 2009 since, in many instances, the employees whose positions were
eliminated can elect or are required to receive their payments over an extended
period of time. In addition, certain exit costs, such as long-term
lease payments, will be paid over periods throughout 2008 and
beyond.
NOTE
10: RETIREMENT PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Components
of the net periodic benefit cost for all major funded and unfunded U.S. and
Non-U.S. defined benefit plans for the three and nine months ended September 30,
are as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
Major
defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Expected
return on plan
assets
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
Amortization
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
net actuarial
loss
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Pension
(income) expense
before special
termination
benefits, curtailments,
and
settlements
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Special
termination
benefits
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Curtailment
gains
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Settlement
gains
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net
pension (income) expense
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Other
plans including unfunded plans
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Total
net pension (income) expense from
continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, $7 million and $17 million,
respectively, of special termination benefits charges were incurred as a result
of the Company's restructuring actions and, therefore, have been included in
restructuring costs and other in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
The
Company made contributions (funded plans) or paid benefits (unfunded plans)
totaling approximately $30 million relating to its major U.S. and non-U.S.
defined benefit pension plans in the third quarter of 2008. The
Company expects its contribution (funded plans) and benefit payment (unfunded
plans) requirements for its major U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension
plans for the balance of 2008 to be approximately $29 million.
Postretirement
benefit cost for the Company's U.S., United Kingdom and Canada postretirement
benefit plans, which represent the Company's major postretirement plans,
includes:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Amortization
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior
service credit
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Actuarial
loss
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other
postretirement benefit cost
before curtailments and
settlements
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Curtailment
gain
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Settlement
gain
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Total
net postretirement benefit
(income) expense
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company paid benefits totaling approximately $52 million relating to its U.S.,
United Kingdom and Canada postretirement benefit plans in the third quarter of
2008. The Company expects to pay benefits of $51 million for these
postretirement plans for the balance of 2008.
On August
1, 2008, the Company adopted and announced certain changes to its U.S.
postretirement benefit plan affecting its post-September 1991 retirees beginning
January 1, 2009. For affected participants, the terms of the
amendment reduce the Company’s contribution toward retiree medical coverage from
its 2008 level by one percentage point per year for a 10-year period, phase-out
Company contributions for dependent medical coverage over the same 10-year
period with access only coverage beginning in 2018, and discontinue retiree
dental coverage and Company paid life insurance.
The
changes made to the plan resulted in the remeasurement of the plan’s obligations
as of August 1, 2008, the date the changes were adopted and announced by the
Company. This remeasurement reduced the Company’s other
postretirement benefit obligation by $919 million of which $772 million is
attributable to the plan changes. In addition, the Company recognized
a curtailment gain of $79 million as a result of the amendment. The
curtailment gain is included in cost of goods sold, selling, general and
administrative expenses, and research and development costs in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008.
The
Company’s benefits to U.S. long-term disability recipients were also amended as
described above. These changes resulted in a reduction in Pension and
other postretirement liabilities, and a corresponding gain of $15 million has
been included in the cost of goods sold, selling, general and administrative
expenses, and research and development costs in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In
addition to the curtailment and other gain noted above, and as a result of the
Company’s restructuring actions, the Company recognized net curtailment gains of
$6 million in certain of its defined benefit and other postretirement benefit
obligation plans that have been included in restructuring costs, rationalization
and other in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
The
Company accounts for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans
in accordance with SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106 and 132(R)).” SFAS No. 158 requires that the funded status of
all overfunded plans be aggregated and presented as an asset. The
funded status of all underfunded plans must also be aggregated and presented as
a liability. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 the
funded status of all overfunded plans was approximately $2.6 billion and $2.5
billion, respectively, which is reflected in Other long-term assets in the
Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. As of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the funded status of all underfunded
plans was approximately $1.9 billion and $3.4 billion,
respectively. In accordance with SFAS No. 158 the measurement date
used to determine the funded status of each of the Company’s pension and other
postretirement benefits plan is December 31 unless certain remeasurement events
occur. The Company’s most significant overfunded pension plan has not
been remeasured since December 31, 2007 and plan assets are therefore reflected
as of that date.
Certain
of the Company's retirement plans were remeasured during the third quarter of
2008. The remeasurement of the funded status of those plans during
the quarter decreased the Company's recognized defined benefit and other
postretirement benefit plan obligation by $1,244 million, inclusive of the $919
million benefit obligation reduction noted above.
NOTE
11: EARNINGS PER SHARE
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company calculated diluted
net earnings per share excluding the assumed conversion of outstanding options
to purchase 22.9 million and 25.3 million shares, respectively, of the Company’s
common stock. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, the
Company calculated diluted net earnings per share excluding the assumed
conversion of outstanding options to purchase 25.7 million shares of the
Company’s common stock. These options were excluded in the
computation of diluted net earnings per share because the options’ exercise
prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for each
of these periods.
As a
result of the net loss from continuing operations presented for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, the Company calculated the diluted net earnings per
share using weighted average basic shares outstanding for the respective
periods, as utilizing diluted shares would be
anti-dilutive. Therefore, outstanding options to purchase 29.8
million shares of the Company's common stock were not included in the
computation of diluted net earnings per share for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
The
Company currently has $575 million in contingent convertible notes (the
Convertible Securities) outstanding that were issued in October
2003. Interest on the Convertible Securities accrues at a rate of
3.375% and is payable semi-annually. Under certain conditions, the
Convertible Securities are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 32.2373
shares of the Company's common stock for each $1,000 principal of the
Convertible Securities. The Company's diluted net earnings per share
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 excludes the effect of the Convertible Securities, as they
were anti-dilutive for each of these periods. Diluted net earnings
per share for the three months ended September 30, 2008 includes the effect of
the convertible securities, as they were dilutive to earnings per
share.
The
following tables set forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss)
from continuing operations per share of common stock for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Earnings (Numerator)
|
|
|
Shares (Denominator)
|
|
|
Per Share Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from continuing operations available to common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
|
283.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
share-based awards
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
securities
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
earnings from continuing operations available to common stockholders and
assumed issuances and conversions
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
|
301.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Earnings (Numerator)
|
|
|
Shares (Denominator)
|
|
|
Per Share Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
from continuing operations available to common
stockholders
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
286.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
share-based awards
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
earnings from continuing operations available to common stockholders and
assumed issuances and conversions
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
286.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
12: SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
The
Company has 950 million shares of authorized common stock with a par value of
$2.50 per share, of which 391 million shares had been issued as of September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007. Treasury stock at cost consists of
approximately 117 million and 103 million shares as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
Share
Repurchase Program
On June
24, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new
share repurchase program allowing the Company, at management’s determination, to
purchase up to $1.0 billion of its common stock. The program will
expire at the earlier of December 31, 2009 or when the Company has used all
authorized funds for repurchase. The share repurchase program does
not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares of
its common stock, and the program may be extended, modified, suspended, or
discontinued at any time. As of September 30, 2008, the Company has
repurchased approximately 14 million shares under the program with an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $219 million, representing an average price paid
per share of $15.53.
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
Realized
and unrealized (loss) gain from hedging activity,
net of tax
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Currency
translation adjustments
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
Pension
and other postretirement benefit plan obligation
activity, net of tax
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Total
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
pension and other postretirement benefit plan obligation activity is primarily
the result of a benefit plan amendment and remeasurement of certain benefit plan
obligations. Refer to Note 10, “Retirement Plans and Other
Postretirement Benefits” for more information.
NOTE
13: SEGMENT INFORMATION
Kodak
Operating Model and Reporting Structure
The
Company has three reportable segments: Consumer Digital Imaging Group (CDG),
Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group (FPEG), and Graphic Communications
Group (GCG). The balance of the Company's continuing operations,
which individually and in the aggregate do not meet the criteria of a reportable
segment, are reported in All Other. A description of the segments is
as follows:
Consumer Digital Imaging Group
Segment (CDG): CDG encompasses digital still and video
cameras, digital devices, such as picture frames, snapshot printers and related
media, kiosks and related media, APEX drylab systems which were introduced in
the second quarter of 2008, consumer inkjet printing, Kodak Gallery, and imaging
sensors. The APEX drylab system provides an alternative to
traditional photofinishing processing at retail locations. CDG also
includes the licensing activities related to the Company's intellectual property
in digital imaging products.
Film, Photofinishing and
Entertainment Group Segment (FPEG): FPEG encompasses consumer
and professional film, one-time-use cameras, graphic arts film, aerial and
industrial film, and entertainment imaging products and
services. In addition, this segment includes paper and output
systems, and photofinishing services. This segment provides
consumers, professionals, cinematographers, and other entertainment imaging
customers with film-related products and services, and also provides graphic
arts film to the graphics industry.
Graphic
Communications Group Segment (GCG): GCG serves a
variety of customers in the creative, in-plant, data center, commercial
printing, packaging, newspaper and digital service bureau market segments with a
range of software, media and hardware products that provide customers with a
variety of solutions for prepress equipment, workflow software, digital and
traditional printing, document scanning and multi-vendor
services. Products and related services include workflow software and
digital controller development; digital printing, which includes continuous
inkjet and electrophotographic products, including equipment, consumables and
service; prepress consumables; output devices; proofing hardware, media and
software; and document scanners.
All Other: All
Other is composed of Kodak's display business and other small, miscellaneous
businesses.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company changed its cost allocation methodologies related
to employee benefits and corporate expenses. For the three months
ended September 30, 2007, this change decreased cost of goods sold by $6
million, increased selling, general, and administrative costs by $3 million, and
increased research and development costs by $3 million. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, this change decreased cost of goods sold by $21
million, increased selling, general, and administrative costs by $11 million,
and increased research and development costs by $10 million.
Prior
period segment results have been revised to reflect the changes in segment
reporting structure and cost allocation methodologies outlined
above.
The
changes in cost allocation methodologies referred to above increased (decreased)
segment operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
All
Other
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Consolidated
impact
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
financial information is shown below:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
|
2,738 |
|
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
All
Other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Consolidated
total
|
|
$ |
2,405 |
|
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before interest expense, other income
(charges), net
and income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
All
Other
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Total
of segments
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Restructuring
costs, rationalization and other
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(594 |
) |
Postemployment
benefit changes
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
operating income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Legal
contingency
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Legal
settlement
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Other
income (charges), net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Consolidated
earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
As of
September 30,
2008
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
|
$ |
2,442 |
|
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
All
Other
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Total
of segments
|
|
|
9,476 |
|
|
|
9,960 |
|
Cash
and marketable securities
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
2,976 |
|
Deferred
income tax assets
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
Other
corporate assets/reserves
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Consolidated
total assets
|
|
$ |
11,913 |
|
|
$ |
13,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
14: ACQUISITIONS
On April
4, 2008, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of
Design2Launch (D2L), a developer of collaborative end-to-end digital workflow
solutions for marketers, brand owners and creative teams. D2L is part
of the Company’s Graphic Communications Group segment.
On April
10, 2008, the Company announced that it had completed the acquisition of
Intermate A/S, a global supplier of remote monitoring and print connectivity
solutions used extensively in transactional printing. Intermate A/S
is part of the Company’s Graphic Communications Group segment.
The two
acquisitions had an aggregate purchase price of approximately $37 million and
were individually immaterial to the Company’s financial position as of September
30, 2008, and its results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
NOTE
15: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The
significant components of earnings from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes, are as follows:
(in
millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30, |
|
|
September
30, |
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
from Health Group operations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
Revenues
from HPA operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Total
revenues from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
income from Health Group operations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Pre-tax
gain on sale of Health Group segment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
986 |
|
Pre-tax
income from HPA operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
(Provision)
benefit for income taxes related to discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
All
other items, net
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
(Loss)
earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Refund
In the
second quarter of 2008, the Company received a tax refund from the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service. The refund was related to the audit of certain
claims filed for tax years 1993-1998. A portion of the refund related
to past federal income taxes paid in relation to the 1994 sale of a subsidiary,
Sterling Winthrop Inc., which was reported in discontinued
operations. The refund had a positive impact on the Company’s
earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 of $295 million. Refer to Note 5, “Income
Taxes,” for further discussion of the tax refund.
Health
Group
On April
30, 2007, the Company sold all of the assets and business operations of its
Health Group segment to Onex Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (“Onex”) (now known as
Carestream Health, Inc.), a subsidiary of Onex Corporation, for up to $2.55
billion. The price was composed of $2.35 billion in cash at closing
and $200 million in additional future payments if Onex achieves certain returns
with respect to its investment.
The
Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $980 million on the sale of the Health
Group segment in the second quarter of 2007, and recorded pre-tax true-up
adjustments to the gain on sale totaling $6 million in the third quarter of
2007, primarily related to gains from pension settlements. The
pre-tax gain excluded the following: up to $200 million of potential future
payments related to Onex's return on its investment as noted above; potential
charges or credits related to settling pension obligations with Onex in future
periods; and any adjustments that may be made in the future that are currently
under review.
The
Company was required to use a portion of the initial $2.35 billion cash proceeds
to fully repay its approximately $1.15 billion of Secured Term
Debt. In accordance with EITF No 87-24, “Allocation of Interest to
Discontinued Operations,” the Company allocated to discontinued operations the
interest expense related to the Secured Term Debt because it was required to be
repaid as a result of the sale. Interest expense allocated to
discontinued operations totaled $30 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007, respectively.
HPA
On
October 17, 2007, the shareholders of Hermes Precisa Pty. Ltd. (“HPA”), a
majority owned subsidiary of Kodak (Australasia) Pty. Ltd., a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, approved an agreement to sell all of the shares of
HPA to Salmat Limited. The sale was approved by the Federal Court of
Australia on October 18, 2007, and closed on November 2, 2007. Kodak
received $139 million in cash at closing for its shares of HPA, and recognized a
pre-tax gain on the sale of $123 million during the fourth quarter of
2007. HPA, a publicly traded Australian company, is a provider of
outsourced services in business communication and data processes and was
formerly reported within the Company’s Graphic Communications Group
segment.
Due to
recent disruptions in the broad financial markets and global economic weakness,
management has placed increased emphasis on monitoring and managing the risks
associated with the current economic environment, particularly the
collectability of receivables, the fair value of assets, and the Company’s
liquidity. Management has assessed the implications of these recent
events on the Company’s current businesses and believes that there has not been
a significant impact to the Company’s financial position as of September 30,
2008 or liquidity during the first nine months of 2008. Management
will continue to monitor and manage the risks associated with the current
economic environment and their impact on the Company’s financial
position. Refer to Item 1A of Part II, “Risk Factors.”
Kodak
Operating Model and Reporting Structure
The
Company has three reportable segments: Consumer Digital Imaging Group (CDG),
Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group (FPEG), and Graphic Communications
Group (GCG). Within each of the Company’s reportable segments are
various components, or Strategic Product Groups (SPGs). Throughout
the remainder of this document, references to the segments' SPGs are indicated
in italics. The balance of the Company's continuing operations, which
individually and in the aggregate do not meet the criteria of a reportable
segment, are reported in All Other. A description of the segments is
as follows:
Consumer Digital Imaging Group
Segment (CDG): CDG encompasses digital still and video
cameras, digital devices such as picture frames, snapshot printers and related
media, kiosks and related media, APEX drylab systems which were introduced in
the second quarter of 2008, consumer inkjet printing, Kodak Gallery, and imaging
sensors. The APEX drylab system provides an alternative to
traditional photofinishing processing at retail locations. CDG also
includes the licensing activities related to the Company's intellectual property
in digital imaging products.
Film, Photofinishing and
Entertainment Group Segment (FPEG): FPEG encompasses consumer
and professional film, one-time-use cameras, graphic arts film, aerial and
industrial film, and entertainment imaging products and
services. In addition, this segment also includes paper and
output systems, and photofinishing services. This segment provides
consumers, professionals, cinematographers, and other entertainment imaging
customers with film-related products and services and also provides graphic arts
film to the graphics industry.
Graphic
Communications Group Segment (GCG): GCG serves a
variety of customers in the creative, in-plant, data center, commercial
printing, packaging, newspaper and digital service bureau market segments with a
range of software, media and hardware products that provide customers with a
variety of solutions for prepress equipment, workflow software, digital and
traditional printing, document scanning, and multi-vendor
services. Products and related services include workflow software and
digital controller development; digital printing, which includes continuous
inkjet and electrophotographic products, including equipment, consumables and
service; prepress consumables; output devices; proofing hardware, media and
software; and document scanners.
All Other: All
Other is composed of Kodak's display business and other small, miscellaneous
businesses.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company changed its cost allocation methodologies related
to employee benefits and corporate expenses. For the three months
ended September 30, 2007, this change decreased cost of goods sold by $6
million, increased selling, general, and administrative costs by $3 million, and
increased research and development costs by $3 million. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, this change decreased cost of goods sold by $21
million, increased selling, general, and administrative costs by $11 million,
and increased research and development costs by $10 million.
Prior
period segment results have been revised to reflect the changes in segment
reporting structure and cost allocation methodologies outlined
above.
The
changes in cost allocation methodologies referred to above increased (decreased)
segment operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
All
Other
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Consolidated
impact
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales from Continuing Operations by Reportable Segment and All
Other
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Impact*
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Impact*
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside
the U.S.
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
+2 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,122 |
|
|
|
+4 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Outside
the U.S.
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
+15 |
|
|
|
+4 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
+28 |
|
|
|
+8 |
|
Total
Consumer Digital Imaging Group
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
+7 |
|
|
|
+2 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
+14 |
|
|
|
+3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside
the U.S.
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
-24 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
-19 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Outside
the U.S.
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
-15 |
|
|
|
+3 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
-13 |
|
|
|
+5 |
|
Total
Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment
Group
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
-18 |
|
|
|
+2 |
|
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
|
2,738 |
|
|
|
-15 |
|
|
|
+4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside
the U.S.
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
-18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Outside
the U.S.
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
+7 |
|
|
|
+6 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
+9 |
|
|
|
+9 |
|
Total
Graphic Communications Group
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
+4 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
|
|
+2 |
|
|
|
+6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside
the U.S.
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Outside
the U.S.
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
All Other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside
the U.S.
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
-11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
-7 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Outside
the U.S.
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
+5 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
4,272 |
|
|
|
+3 |
|
|
|
+7 |
|
Consolidated
Total
|
|
$ |
2,405 |
|
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
+3 |
% |
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
+4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Represents the percentage point change in segment net sales for the period
that is attributable to foreign currency
fluctuations
|
Earnings
(Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Interest Expense, Other Income
(Charges), Net and Income Taxes by Reportable Segment and All Other
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Digital Imaging Group
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
+28 |
% |
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
|
-27 |
% |
Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
-32 |
% |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
-41 |
% |
Graphic
Communications Group
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
-36 |
% |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
-53 |
% |
All
Other
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
+29 |
% |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
+24 |
% |
Total
of segments
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
|
-26 |
% |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
|
-80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
costs, rationalization and other
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Postemployment
benefit changes
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
operating income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
contingency
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
settlement
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other
income (charges), net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
+416 |
% |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
|
|
+112 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
COMPARED WITH 2007
Third
Quarter
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS – CONTINUING OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
2,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(128 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
-2 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
-24 |
% |
Restructuring
costs, rationalization and other
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
-52 |
% |
Other
operating expenses (income), net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
-50 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net and income
taxes
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
880 |
% |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
-7 |
% |
Other
income (charges), net
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
-79 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
416 |
% |
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
-500 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
216 |
% |
(Loss)
earnings from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
-200 |
% |
NET
EARNINGS
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
159 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
2,405 |
|
|
|
-5.1 |
% |
|
|
-3.2 |
% |
|
|
-4.7 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
0.8pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-5.1pp
|
|
|
0.3pp
|
|
|
5.6pp
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
For the
three months ended September 30, 2008, net sales decreased compared with the
same period in 2007 due to unfavorable price/mix within all three segments and
industry-related volume declines driven by Film Capture and Traditional Photofinishing
within FPEG. These declines were partially offset by volume
increases in CDG, Document
Imaging within GCG, and favorable foreign exchange across all segments.
Within CDG, Digital Capture and Devices and Consumer Inkjet Systems
experienced significant increases in volume over the prior-year
period. Unfavorable price/mix was primarily driven by Digital Capture and Devices
within CDG.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit declined in the third quarter of 2008 in dollars but increased as a
percentage of sales, primarily due to reductions in manufacturing and other
costs within CDG, partially offset by unfavorable price/mix across all
segments. The improvements in manufacturing and other costs were
driven by manufacturing efficiencies within CDG, the benefit of lower
depreciation expense as a result of the change in useful lives executed during
the first quarter of 2008, lower restructuring-related charges and curtailment
and other gains caused by changes to certain of the Company’s U.S.
postemployment benefit plans (see below), partially offset by an increase in
silver, paper and petroleum-based raw material and other costs.
Included
in gross profit for the quarter is a non-recurring amendment of an intellectual
property licensing agreement within Digital Capture and
Devices. The amendment of this licensing agreement contributed
approximately 4.7% of consolidated revenue to consolidated gross profit dollars
in the current quarter, as compared with 2.7% of consolidated revenue to
consolidated gross profit dollars for a non-recurring arrangement in the prior
year quarter.
In the
first quarter of 2008, the Company performed an updated analysis of expected
industry-wide declines in the traditional film and paper businesses and its
useful lives on related assets. This analysis indicated that the
assets will continue to be used in these businesses for a longer period than
previously anticipated. As a result, the Company revised the useful
lives of certain existing production machinery and equipment, and
manufacturing-related buildings effective January 1, 2008. These
assets, which were previously set to fully depreciate by mid-2010, are now being
depreciated with estimated useful lives ending from 2011 to 2015. The
change in useful lives reflects the Company’s estimate of future periods to be
benefited from the use of the property, plant, and equipment. As a
result of these changes, for 2008 the Company expects that depreciation expense
will be reduced by approximately $107 million, of which approximately $95
million will benefit pretax earnings from continuing operations. The
net impact of the change in estimate to earnings from continuing operations for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 is an increase of $26 million, or $.09
on a fully-diluted earnings per share basis. Refer to Note 1, “Basis
of Presentation.”
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
decrease in consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A)
was a result of company-wide cost reduction actions and curtailment and other
gains recognized due to changes to certain of the Company’s U.S. postemployment
benefit plans (see below), partially offset by unfavorable foreign
exchange.
Research
and Development Costs
The
decrease in consolidated research and development costs (R&D) was a result
of curtailment and other gains recognized due to changes to certain of the
Company’s U.S. postemployment benefit plans (see below), and reduced spending in
2008 in CDG related to the introduction of consumer inkjet printers in
2007.
Postemployment
Benefit Plan Changes
In the
third quarter of 2008, the Company amended certain of its U.S. postemployment
benefits effective as of January 1, 2009. As a result of these plan
changes, curtailment and other gains of $94 million were recognized in the third
quarter of 2008. The gains are reflected in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations as follows: $48 million in cost of goods sold, $27
million in SG&A, and $19 million in R&D. The impact of these
gains is not reflected in segment results. Refer to Note 10,
“Retirement Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits” and Note 13, “Segment
Information.”
Restructuring
Costs, Rationalization and Other
These
costs, as well as the restructuring and rationalization-related costs reported
in cost of goods sold, are discussed under "RESTRUCTURING COSTS, RATIONALIZATION
AND OTHER" section.
Other Income
(Charges), Net
The other
income (charges), net category primarily includes interest income, income and
losses from equity investments, and foreign exchange gains and
losses. The decrease in other income (charges), net was primarily
attributable to a decrease in interest income due to lower interest rates and
lower cash balances in the third quarter of 2008 as compared with 2007, and an
increase in losses on foreign exchange transactions as compared with the prior
year quarter.
Income
Tax Provision (Benefit)
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Earnings
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
Effective
tax rate
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
(28.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the
Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations is primarily
attributable to: (1) earnings generated within the U.S. in the third
quarter of 2008 that were not taxed due to the impact of valuation
allowances, (2) a tax benefit recorded in
continuing operations in 2007 for losses in certain jurisdictions where
historically there have been valuation allowances due to the
recognition of the pre-tax gain in discontinued operations, (3) losses
generated in certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. that were not benefited due
to the impact of valuation allowances, (4) the mix of earnings from
operations in certain lower-taxed jurisdictions outside the U.S., and (5)
adjustments for uncertain tax positions and audit settlements.
CONSUMER
DIGITAL IMAGING GROUP
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net
and income taxes
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
-10.0 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
-3.3pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-9.9pp
|
|
|
0.8pp
|
|
|
5.8pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
Net sales
for CDG increased 7% due to growth in Digital Capture and Devices
and Consumer Inkjet
Systems.
Net sales
of Digital Capture and
Devices, which includes consumer digital still and video cameras, digital
picture frames, accessories, memory products, snapshot printers and related
media, and intellectual property royalties, increased 7% in the third quarter of
2008 as compared with the prior year quarter, primarily reflecting higher
volumes of digital cameras and digital picture frames, increased intellectual
property royalties (see gross profit discussion below), and favorable foreign
exchange, partially offset by unfavorable price/mix.
Net
worldwide sales of Consumer
Inkjet Systems, which includes inkjet printers and related consumables,
increased significantly, reflecting volume improvements due to the launch of the
product line at the end of the first quarter of 2007 and the introduction of the
second generation of printers in the first quarter of 2008, and favorable
foreign exchange, partially offset by unfavorable price/mix.
Net sales
of Retail Systems Solutions,
which includes kiosks and related media and APEX drylab systems,
increased 2% in the third quarter of 2008, reflecting higher media volumes and
favorable foreign exchange. These increases were partially offset by
unfavorable price/mix.
Gross Profit
The
decrease in gross profit margin for CDG was primarily attributable to
unfavorable price/mix primarily within Digital Capture and Devices
and Consumer Inkjet
Systems, partially offset by reduced manufacturing and other costs and
favorable foreign exchange within both of these SPGs. The reduction
in manufacturing and other costs was due to manufacturing efficiencies driven by
improved leverage of product platforms.
Included
in gross profit for the quarter is a non-recurring amendment of an intellectual
property licensing agreement with an existing licensee. The impact of
this licensing arrangement contributed approximately 13.7% of segment revenue to
segment gross profit dollars in the current quarter, as compared with 8.8% of
segment revenue to segment gross profit dollars for a non-recurring arrangement
in the prior year quarter.
The
current quarter results also include approximately $32 million related to
intellectual property licensing arrangements under which the Company’s
continuing obligations are expected to be fulfilled by the end of
2008. The Company expects to secure other new licensing arrangements,
the timing and amounts of which are difficult to predict. These types
of arrangements provide the Company with a return on portions of historical
R&D investments and new licensing opportunities are expected to have a
continuing impact on the results of operations.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
decrease in SG&A expenses for CDG was primarily driven by ongoing efforts to
achieve target cost models, partially offset by unfavorable foreign
exchange.
Research
and Development Costs
The decrease in research and
development (R&D) costs for CDG was primarily attributable to lower spending
in 2008 as compared to the prior year due to the introduction of consumer inkjet
printers in 2007, and decreased spending in the current quarter as a result of
cost reduction actions taken throughout the segment. These decreases were partially offset
by increased spending on CMOS sensor R&D
activities.
FILM,
PHOTOFINISHING AND ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
|
-18 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
-26 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
-23 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net
and income taxes
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
|
-32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
|
-17.7 |
% |
|
|
-18.9 |
% |
|
|
-1.3 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
-2.8pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-3.1pp
|
|
|
0.0pp
|
|
|
0.3pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
Net sales
for FPEG decreased 18% primarily due to decreases in Film Capture and Traditional Photofinishing.
Net worldwide sales of Film
Capture and Traditional
Photofinishing decreased 40% and 17%, respectively, in the third quarter
of 2008 as compared with the third quarter of 2007, primarily reflecting
continuing declines in the consumer film industry, partially offset by favorable
foreign exchange.
Net
worldwide sales for Entertainment Imaging
decreased 3% compared with the prior year, reflecting slight unfavorability in
volumes and price/mix, partially offset by favorable foreign
exchange. These volume declines are primarily due to the delay in
creation of feature films resulting from current contract negotiations between
the studios and the Screen Actors’ Guild.
Gross
Profit
The
decrease in FPEG gross profit dollars is primarily a result of declines in sales
volume within Film Capture
as described above, and unfavorable price/mix within Entertainment Imaging and
Film
Capture.
The
decrease in FPEG gross profit margin was primarily driven by unfavorable
price/mix within Entertainment
Imaging and Film
Capture. The manufacturing and other costs decreased slightly
due to the benefit of lower depreciation expense as a result of the change in
useful lives executed during the first quarter of this year. These
cost decreases were mostly offset by higher costs for silver, paper, and
petroleum-based raw material and other costs. Refer to Note 1, “Basis
of Presentation.”
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
decline in SG&A expenses for FPEG was attributable to ongoing efforts to
achieve target cost models, partially offset by unfavorable foreign
exchange.
GRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
-2 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations
before
interest expense, other income
(charges),
net and income taxes
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
|
-36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
821 |
|
|
|
-1.9 |
% |
|
|
-2.6 |
% |
|
|
-3.5 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
-1.2pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-2.2pp
|
|
|
0.0pp
|
|
|
1.0pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
GCG net
sales for the quarter decreased 2% as compared with the prior-year quarter as a
result of volume declines and unfavorable price/mix within Prepress Solutions and Digital Printing Solutions,
partially offset by favorable
foreign exchange. Recent global financial market disruptions have
affected equipment placements across most product lines, and tightening credit
availability has resulted in deferrals of some orders taken earlier this year at
the drupa tradeshow.
Net
worldwide sales of Prepress
Solutions decreased 3%, primarily driven by volume declines and
unfavorable price/mix in analog plates, partially offset by favorable foreign
exchange and volume growth in digital plates. The overall volume
performance was driven largely by softness in the U.S. market. New
product introductions continue to enhance digital plate growth.
Net
worldwide sales of Digital
Printing Solutions decreased 7%, primarily driven by unfavorable
price/mix and lower volumes in digital printing equipment, partially offset by
favorable foreign exchange and growth in digital printing consumable
volumes. Inkjet and electrophotographic color equipment volumes were
negatively impacted by the economic issues in the financial markets that have
restricted the availability of credit and delayed purchase
decisions. The decline in black-and-white electrophotographic
equipment volumes continues as customers convert to solutions that offer color
options. Page volume growth of 15% in the color electrophotographic
space was a key contributor to the growth of consumable sales volumes in the
quarter.
Net
worldwide sales of Document
Imaging increased 3%. Unfavorable price/mix was more than
offset by volume growth and favorable foreign exchange. For the
quarter, strong growth was realized in both Distributed Scanners and Production
Scanners.
Net
worldwide sales of Enterprise
Solutions increased 6%, primarily due to favorable foreign exchange,
strong volume growth in the production workflow products, and acquisitions made
in the second quarter of 2008.
Gross
Profit
The
decline in gross profit, in both dollars and as a percentage of sales, was
driven by Prepress Solutions,
due to unfavorable price/mix in plates and output devices and unfavorable
manufacturing costs related to higher petroleum-based raw material costs,
increased distribution expense, and manufacturing volume
declines. Favorable aluminum costs versus the prior year quarter, and
foreign exchange partially offset these factors in Prepress
Solutions.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
slight increase in SG&A expenses for GCG was attributable to unfavorable
foreign exchange.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
For
discussion of the results of operations – discontinued operations please refer
to Note 15, “Discontinued Operations,” in the Notes to Financial
Statements.
Year
to Date
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS – CONTINUING OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
% |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
-7 |
% |
Restructuring
costs, rationalization and other
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
-92 |
% |
Other
operating expenses (income), net
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
-58 |
% |
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net and
income
taxes
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
123 |
% |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
Other
income (charges), net
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
-52 |
% |
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
112 |
% |
Benefit
for income taxes
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
113 |
% |
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
163 |
% |
Earnings
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(469 |
) |
|
|
-62 |
% |
NET
EARNINGS
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
6,983 |
|
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
|
|
-0.4 |
% |
|
|
-5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
-0.8pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-5.8pp
|
|
|
0.9pp
|
|
|
4.1pp
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, net sales decreased compared with the same
period in 2007 due primarily to unfavorable price/mix across all segments and
industry related volume declines, driven largely by Film Capture and Traditional Photofinishing
within FPEG. These declines were partially offset by volume
increases in CDG, and Document
Imaging within GCG, and favorable foreign exchange. Within
CDG, Digital Capture and
Devices and Consumer
Inkjet Systems experienced significant increases in volume over the
prior-year period. Unfavorable price/mix was primarily driven by
Consumer Inkjet Systems
and Digital Capture and
Devices within CDG.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit declined in the nine months of 2008 in both dollars and as a percentage
of sales, due largely to unfavorable price/mix across all segments, partially
offset by reductions in manufacturing and other costs within CDG, and favorable
foreign exchange. The improvements in manufacturing and other costs
were driven by manufacturing efficiencies within CDG, the benefit of lower
depreciation expense as a result of the change in useful lives executed during
the first quarter of 2008, changes to the Company’s U.S. postemployment benefit
plans (see below), and lower restructuring-related charges, partially offset by
increased silver, aluminum, paper, and petroleum-based raw material and other
costs. The net impact of the change in useful lives is an increase in
earnings from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
of $69 million, or $.24 on a fully-diluted earnings per share
basis. Refer to Note 1, “Basis of Presentation.”
Included
in gross profit is a non-recurring amendment of an intellectual property
licensing agreement within Digital Capture and
Devices. This licensing arrangement amendment contributed
approximately 1.6% of consolidated revenue to consolidated gross profit dollars
in the current period, as compared with 1.0% of consolidated revenue to
consolidated gross profit dollars for a non-recurring arrangement in the prior
year period.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
year-over-year decrease in consolidated SG&A was primarily attributable to
Company-wide cost reduction actions, and curtailment and other gains recognized
due to changes to certain of the Company’s U.S. postemployment benefit plans
(see below), partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange, increased
expenses to support Consumer
Inkjet Systems’ and
Retail Systems Solutions’ go-to-market activities, and costs associated with
the Company’s participation in the drupa tradeshow in the second quarter of
2008.
Research
and Development Costs
The
decrease in R&D spending compared with prior year was primarily attributable
to curtailment and other gains recognized due to changes to certain of the
Company’s U.S. postemployment benefit plans (see below), and significantly
reduced spending in 2008 in CDG due to the introduction of consumer inkjet
printers in 2007. These decreases in R&D spending were partially
offset by investments in new workflow products in Enterprise Solutions and
R&D related acquisitions made in the second quarter of 2008, both within
GCG.
Postemployment
Benefit Plan Changes
In the
third quarter of 2008, the Company amended certain of its U.S. postemployment
benefits effective as of January 1, 2009. As a result of these plan
changes, curtailment and other gains of $94 million were recognized in the third
quarter of 2008. The gains are reflected in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations as follows: $48 million in cost of goods sold, $27
million in SG&A, and $19 million in R&D. The impact of these
gains is not reflected in segment results. Refer to Note 10,
“Retirement Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits” and Note 13, “Segment
Information.”
Restructuring
Costs, Rationalization and Other
These
costs, as well as the restructuring and rationalization-related costs reported
in cost of goods sold, are discussed under "RESTRUCTURING COSTS, RATIONALIZATION
AND OTHER" section.
Other
Operating Expenses (Income), Net
The other
operating expenses (income), net category includes gains and losses on sales of
capital assets and businesses and certain asset impairment
charges. The year-over-year change in other operating expenses
(income), net was largely driven by higher gains on sales of capital assets and
businesses in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared with
2008.
Other
Income (Charges), Net
The other
income (charges), net category includes interest income, income and losses from
equity investments, and foreign exchange gains and losses. The
decrease in other income (charges), net was primarily attributable to a decrease
in interest income due to lower interest rates and lower cash balances in 2008
as compared with 2007, an increase in losses on foreign exchange as compared
with the prior year, and expense related to support of an educational
institution in the second quarter of 2008.
Income
Tax Benefit
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
Benefit
for income taxes
|
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
Effective
tax rate
|
|
|
(345.2 |
)% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
change in the Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations is
primarily attributable to: (1) a $270 million benefit recognized during the
second quarter of 2008 for interest earned on a refund received from the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service, (2) losses generated within the U.S. and in certain
jurisdictions outside the U.S. in the nine months of 2008 that were not
benefited due to the impact of valuation allowances, (3) a tax benefit recorded
in continuing operations in 2007 for losses in certain jurisdictions where
historically there have been valuation allowances due to the recognition of the
pre-tax gain in discontinued operations, (4) the mix of earnings from operations
in certain lower-taxed jurisdictions outside the U.S., and (5) adjustments for
uncertain tax positions and tax
audits.
CONSUMER
DIGITAL IMAGING GROUP
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
net sales
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
Loss
from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net
and income taxes
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
|
-27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
-13.5 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
-4.8pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-14.4pp
|
|
|
2.0pp
|
|
|
7.6pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
Net sales
for CDG increased 14% primarily due to growth in Consumer Inkjet Systems, Digital
Capture and Devices, and Retail Systems
Solutions.
Net worldwide sales of Digital Capture and
Devices, which includes
consumer digital still and video cameras, digital picture frames, accessories,
memory products, snapshot printers and related media, and intellectual property
royalties, increased 16% in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared
with the prior year period. This increase primarily reflects higher
volumes for digital cameras and digital picture frames, increased intellectual
property royalties (see gross profit discussion below) and favorable foreign
exchange, partially offset by unfavorable price/mix for digital cameras and
digital picture frames. Digital picture frames were introduced at the
end of the first quarter of 2007.
Net
worldwide sales of Consumer
Inkjet Systems, which includes inkjet printers and related consumables,
increased significantly in the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
reflecting volume improvements due to the launch of the product line at the end
of the first quarter of 2007 and the introduction of the second generation of
printers in the first quarter of 2008, and favorable foreign exchange, partially
offset by unfavorable price/mix.
Net
worldwide sales of Retail
Systems Solutions, which includes kiosks and related media and APEX
drylab systems, increased 6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as
compared with the prior year period, reflecting higher equipment and media
volumes as well as favorable foreign exchange, partially offset by unfavorable
price/mix.
Gross Profit
The
decrease in gross profit margin for CDG was primarily attributable to
unfavorable price/mix within Consumer Inkjet Systems and
Digital Capture and
Devices, partially offset by reduced manufacturing and other costs for
those two SPGs, and favorable foreign exchange across all SPGs. The
reduction in manufacturing and other costs was due to manufacturing efficiencies
driven by improved leverage of product platforms.
Included
in gross profit is a non-recurring amendment of an intellectual property
licensing agreement with an existing licensee. The impact of this
amendment contributed approximately 5.3% of segment revenue to segment gross
profit dollars in the current period, as compared with 3.6% of segment revenue
to segment gross profit dollars for a non-recurring arrangement in the prior
year period.
The
current year-to-date results also include approximately $95 million related to
intellectual property licensing arrangements under which the Company’s
continuing obligations are expected to be fulfilled by the end of
2008. The Company expects to secure other new licensing agreements,
the timing and amounts of which are difficult to predict. These types of
arrangements provide the Company with a return on portions of historical R&D
investments and new licensing opportunities are expected to have a continuing
impact on the results of operations.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
increase in SG&A expenses for CDG was primarily driven by increased expenses
to support Consumer Inkjet
Systems’ and Retail
Systems Solutions’ go-to-market activities, and unfavorable foreign
exchange. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
SG&A expenses in Digital
Capture and Devices driven primarily by ongoing efforts to achieve target
cost models.
Research
and Development Costs
The
decrease in research and development (R&D) costs for CDG was primarily
attributable to lower spending in 2008 as compared to the prior year due to the
introduction of consumer inkjet printers in 2007 , and decreased spending in the
current period as a result of cost reduction actions taken throughout the
segment.
FILM,
PHOTOFINISHING AND ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
net sales
|
|
$ |
2,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(403 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
-26 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
-18 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net
and income taxes
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
|
-41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
net sales
|
|
$ |
2,335 |
|
|
|
-14.7 |
% |
|
|
-16.9 |
% |
|
|
-1.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
-3.4pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-2.0pp
|
|
|
0.5pp
|
|
|
-1.9pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
Net sales
for FPEG decreased 15% primarily due to Film Capture and Traditional
Photofinishing. Net worldwide sales of Film Capture and Traditional Photofinishing
decreased 36% and 16%, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2008
as compared with the comparable period of 2007, primarily reflecting continuing
industry volume declines in both of these SPGs, partially offset by favorable
foreign exchange.
Net
worldwide sales for Entertainment Imaging
decreased 3% compared with the prior year period, primarily reflecting the
effects of the writers’ strike that negatively impacted volumes in the first
quarter of 2008, and reduced demand from the delay in creation of feature films
resulting from current contract negotiations between the studios and the Screen
Actors’ Guild. These decreases were partially offset by favorable
foreign exchange.
Gross
Profit
The
decrease in FPEG gross profit dollars is primarily a result of declines in sales
volume within Film Capture
as described above, unfavorable price/mix primarily within Entertainment Imaging and
Traditional
Photofinishing, and increased manufacturing costs across all
SPGs. These declines were partially offset by favorable foreign
exchange.
The
decrease in FPEG gross profit margin was primarily driven by unfavorable
price/mix and increased manufacturing and other costs across all SPGs, partially
offset by favorable foreign exchange. The increased manufacturing and other
costs were driven by higher costs of silver, paper, and petroleum-based raw
material and other costs. These cost increases were partially offset
by the benefit of lower depreciation expense as a result of the change in useful
lives. Refer to Note 1, “Basis of Presentation.”
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
decline in SG&A expenses for FPEG was attributable to ongoing efforts to
achieve target cost models, partially offset by unfavorable foreign
exchange.
GRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Sales
|
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
net sales
|
|
$ |
2,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Research
and development costs
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Earnings
from continuing operations before interest
expense, other income (charges), net
and income taxes
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
|
-53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
Percent
Change vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
2008
Amount
|
|
|
Change
vs. 2007
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price/Mix
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange
|
|
|
Manufacturing
and Other Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
2,513 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
-0.5 |
% |
|
|
-3.4 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit margin
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
-0.9pp
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
-1.5pp
|
|
|
-0.1pp
|
|
|
0.7pp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worldwide
Revenues
GCG net
sales increased 2% as compared with the prior year period, primarily driven by
favorable foreign exchange. Volume growth in digital plates within
Prepress Solutions and in Document Imaging was offset
by volume declines and unfavorable price/mix in analog plates within Prepress Solutions and in
other SPGs. Recent global financial market
disruptions have affected equipment placements across most product lines, and
tightening credit availability has resulted in deferrals of some orders taken
earlier this year at the drupa tradeshow.
Net
worldwide sales of Prepress
Solutions increased 3%, driven primarily by volume growth in digital
plates and favorable foreign exchange, partially offset by volume declines
in analog plates and output devices. New product introductions continue to
enhance digital plate growth.
Net
worldwide sales of Digital
Printing Solutions decreased 2%. Declines in volume and
unfavorable price/mix attributable to equipment products were partially offset
by volume growth in consumables and favorable foreign exchange for all
products. Volume declines were largely attributable to inkjet
equipment placements, where certain customers have delayed purchases based on
the availability of credit and the current economic issues in the marketplace,
and black-and-white electrophotographic equipment, which continues to decline as
certain customers convert to solutions that offer color
options. Color electrophotographic equipment volumes increased,
driven by new product line introductions and enhancements. Page
volume growth of 19% in the color electrophotographic space was a key
contributor to the growth of consumable sales volumes.
Net
worldwide sales of Document
Imaging increased 3% compared with the prior
year period. Unfavorable price/mix was more than offset by volume
growth and favorable foreign exchange. Volume growth in both the
Distributed Scanners and Production Scanners contributed to year over year
performance.
Net
worldwide sales of Enterprise
Solutions increased 2% as compared with the prior year
period. Favorable foreign exchange and acquisitions made during the
second quarter of 2008 were partially offset by unfavorable price/mix and volume
declines.
Gross
Profit
The
decline in gross profit margin was primarily driven by Prepress Solutions, as
increased manufacturing costs related to aluminum and petroleum-based raw
materials, as well as higher distribution expense and manufacturing volume
declines were partially offset by favorable foreign exchange. Document Imaging gross profit
improvements partially offset the declines in Prepress
Solutions.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
increase in SG&A expenses for GCG was attributable to increased costs
associated with the Company’s participation in the drupa tradeshow in the second
quarter of 2008, go-to-market investments, and unfavorable foreign
exchange.
Research
and Development Costs
The
increase in R&D costs for GCG was driven by investments in new workflow
products in Enterprise
Solutions, R&D related to acquisitions made in the second quarter of
2008, and increased investments in Document Imaging
technologies.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
For
discussion of the results of operations – discontinued operations please refer
to Note 15, “Discontinued Operations,” in the Notes to Financial
Statements.
RESTRUCTURING
COSTS, RATIONALIZATION AND OTHER
The
Company has completed the cost reduction program that was initially announced in
January 2004, which was referred to as the “2004–2007 Restructuring
Program.” With the completion of the 2004-2007 Restructuring Program,
the Company has drastically reduced the amount and scope of workforce reduction
plans and exit and disposal activities. However, the Company
recognizes the need to continually rationalize its workforce and streamline its
operations to remain competitive in the face of an ever-changing business and
economic climate. These initiatives, referred to as ongoing
rationalization activities, began in the first quarter of 2008.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company made cash
payments of approximately $21 million and $101 million, respectively, related to
restructuring and rationalization.
The $52
million of charges, net of reversals, for the third quarter of 2008 includes $2
million of charges for accelerated depreciation and $2 million of charges for
inventory write-downs, which were reported in cost of goods sold in the
accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The remaining costs incurred, net of reversals,
of $48 million were reported as restructuring costs, rationalization and other
in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The severance and exit costs reserves
require the outlay of cash, while long-lived asset impairments, accelerated
depreciation and inventory write-downs represent non-cash items.
The
charges, net of reversals, of $52 million recorded in the third quarter of 2008
included $6 million applicable to FPEG, $23 million applicable to CDG, $17
million applicable to GCG, and $6 million that was applicable to manufacturing,
research and development, and administrative functions, which are shared across
all segments.
The
ongoing rationalization actions implemented in the third quarter of 2008 are
expected to generate future annual cash savings of approximately $62
million. These savings are expected to reduce future cost of goods
sold, SG&A, and R&D expenses by $41 million, $17 million, and $4
million, respectively. On a year-to-date basis, the ongoing
rationalization actions implemented during the first three quarters of 2008 are
expected to generate future annual cash savings of approximately $68
million. These savings are expected to reduce future cost of goods
sold, SG&A, and R&D expenses by $41 million, $20 million, and $7
million, respectively. The Company began realizing these savings in
the first quarter of 2008, and expects the savings to be fully realized by the
end of the second quarter of 2009 as most of the actions and severance payouts
are completed.
Rationalization
charges are expected in the fourth quarter of 2008 and beyond as the Company
will continue to explore and execute on cost efficiency opportunities with
respect to its sales, manufacturing and administrative
infrastructure.
Cash
Flow Activity
|
|
Nine
months ended
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(659 |
) |
|
$ |
(694 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
330 |
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Net
cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,335 |
|
|
|
(2,335 |
) |
Net
cash used in (provided by) investing activities
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
(1,105 |
) |
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
$ |
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Net cash
used in continuing operations from operating activities decreased $35 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared with the corresponding
period in 2007, due primarily to improvements on a year-over-year basis in
accounts receivable, lower restructuring payments, and the interest portion of a
federal income tax refund received in the second quarter of 2008. The
impact from these factors was partially offset by lower cash earnings from
continuing operations for the first nine months of 2008 as compared with the
prior period, mainly due to non-cash income related to curtailment and other
gains recognized in the third quarter of 2008 on the U.S. postemployment benefit
plan changes, and a non-recurring intellectual property licensing agreement
included in earnings for the third quarter of 2008, for which the cash will be
received in 2009. Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued
operations increased $330 million as compared with the prior year period due
primarily to the receipt, in the second quarter of 2008, of a refund of past
federal income taxes paid. Refer to Note 5, “Income
Taxes.”
Investing
Activities
Net cash
used in continuing operations from investing activities increased $106 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared with the corresponding
period in 2007 due primarily to lower cash proceeds received from sales of
assets and businesses. Net cash provided by discontinued operations
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $2,335 million represents the
proceeds received from the sale of the Health Group in the second quarter of
2007. Refer to Note 15, “Discontinued Operations.”
Financing
Activities
Net cash
used in financing activities decreased $633 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared with the corresponding period in 2007 due to
lower repayments of borrowings, mainly due to the repayment of the Company’s
Secured Term Debt in the second quarter of 2007 that was required as a result of
the sale of the Health Group. The impact on cash usage from lower
debt repayments was partially offset by repurchases of the Company’s common
stock that commenced in the third quarter of 2008.
On June
24, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new
share repurchase program allowing the Company, at management’s determination, to
purchase up to $1.0 billion of its common stock. The program will
expire at the earlier of December 31, 2009 or when the Company has used all
authorized funds for repurchase. For the nine months ended September
30, 2008, the Company repurchased approximately 14 million shares at an average
price of $15.53 per share, for a total cost of $219 million under this
program. Under the terms of this program, the Company is authorized
to repurchase an additional $781 million of its common stock through the end of
2009. See Note 12: “Shareholders’
Equity.” Since maintaining financial flexibility is critical in the
current environment, additional share repurchases will depend on the Company’s
assessment of overall economic and market
conditions.
The
Company has a dividend policy whereby it makes semi-annual payments which, when
declared, will be paid on the Company’s 10th business day each July and December
to shareholders of record on the close of the first business day of the
preceding month. On May 14, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a
semi-annual cash dividend of $.25 per share payable to shareholders of record at
the close of business on June 1, 2008. This dividend, which amounted
to $72 million, was paid on July 16, 2008. On October 14, 2008, the
Board of Directors declared a semi-annual cash dividend of $.25 per share
payable to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 3,
2008. This dividend will be paid on December 12, 2008.
The
Company believes that its current cash balance, combined with cash flows from
operating activities, will be sufficient to meet its anticipated needs,
including working capital, capital investments, scheduled debt repayments,
restructuring/rationalization and dividend payments, and employee benefit plan
payments or contributions required. If the global economic weakness
that resulted from recent disruptions in the broad financial markets were to
deteriorate or be prolonged for an extended period, it could impact the
Company’s profitability and related cash generation capability. Refer
to Item 1A of Part II, “Risk Factors.” In addition to its existing
cash balance, the Company may use financing arrangements currently available, as
described in more detail below, to bridge any future timing differences between
required expenditures and cash generated from operations or for unforeseen
shortfalls in cash flow from operating activities.
Short-Term
Borrowings
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis,
maintained $1,050 million in committed bank lines of credit and $497 million in
uncommitted bank lines of credit to ensure continued access to short-term
borrowing capacity.
Secured
Credit Facilities
On
October 18, 2005 the Company closed on $2.7 billion of Senior Secured Credit
Facilities (Secured Credit Facilities) under a new Secured Credit Agreement
(Secured Credit Agreement) and associated Security Agreement and Canadian
Security Agreement. The Secured Credit Facilities consist of a $1.0 billion
5-Year Committed Revolving Credit Facility (5-Year Revolving Credit Facility)
expiring October 18, 2010 and $1.7 billion of Term Loan Facilities (Term
Facilities) expiring October 18, 2012. The Term Facilities were
repaid during 2007 and are no longer available for new borrowings.
The
5-Year Revolving Credit Facility can be used by Eastman Kodak Company (U.S.
Borrower) for general corporate purposes including the issuance of letters of
credit. Amounts available under the facility can be borrowed, repaid
and re-borrowed throughout the term of the facility provided the Company remains
in compliance with covenants contained in the Secured Credit
Agreement. As of September 30, 2008, there was no debt outstanding
and $132 million of letters of credit issued under this facility.
Pursuant
to the Secured Credit Agreement and associated Security Agreement, each
subsidiary organized in the U.S. jointly and severally guarantees the
obligations under the Secured Credit Agreement and all other obligations of the
Company and its subsidiaries to the lenders. The guaranty is
supported by the pledge of certain U.S. assets of the U.S. Borrower and the
Company’s U.S. subsidiaries including, but not limited to, receivables,
inventory, equipment, deposit accounts, investments, intellectual property,
including patents, trademarks and copyrights, and the capital stock of "Material
Subsidiaries." Excluded from pledged assets are real property,
“Principal Properties” and equity interests in “Restricted Subsidiaries,” as
defined in the Company’s 1988 Indenture.
"Material
Subsidiaries" are defined as those subsidiaries with revenues or assets
constituting 5 percent or more of the consolidated revenues or assets of the
corresponding borrower. "Material Subsidiaries" are determined on an
annual basis under the Secured Credit Agreement.
Pursuant
to the Secured Credit Agreement and associated Canadian Security Agreement,
Eastman Kodak Company and Kodak Graphic Communications Company (KGCC, formerly
Creo Americas, Inc.), jointly and severally guarantee the obligations of Kodak
Graphic Communications Canada Company (the Canadian Borrower), to the
lenders. Subsequently, KGCC has been merged into Eastman Kodak
Company. Certain assets of the Canadian Borrower in Canada were also
pledged, including, but not limited to, receivables, inventory, equipment,
deposit accounts, investments, intellectual property, including patents,
trademarks and copyrights, and the capital stock of the Canadian Borrower's
Material Subsidiaries.
Interest
rates for borrowings under the Secured Credit Agreement are dependent on the
Company’s Long Term Senior Secured Credit Rating. The Secured Credit
Agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants customary in a
facility of this type, including two quarterly financial covenants: (1) a
consolidated debt for borrowed money to consolidated earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) (subject to adjustments to exclude
any extraordinary income or losses, as defined by the Secured Credit Agreement,
interest income and certain non-cash items of income and expense) ratio on a
rolling four-quarter basis of not greater than 3.50 to 1 as of December 31, 2006
and thereafter, and (2) a consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense
(subject to adjustments to exclude interest expense not related to borrowed
money) ratio, on a rolling four-quarter basis, of no less than 3.00 to
1. As of September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants under the Secured Credit Agreement.
In
addition, subject to various conditions and exceptions in the Secured Credit
Agreement, in the event the Company sells assets for net proceeds totaling $75
million or more in any year, except for proceeds used within 12 months for
reinvestments in the business of up to $300 million, proceeds from sales of
assets used in the Company's non-digital products and services businesses to
prepay or repay debt or pay cash restructuring charges within 12 months from the
date of sale of the assets, or proceeds from the sale of inventory in the
ordinary course of business, the amount in excess of $75 million must be applied
to prepay loans under the Secured Credit Agreement.
The
Company pays a commitment fee at an annual rate of 37.5 basis points on the
undrawn balance of the 5-Year Revolving Credit Facility at the Company’s current
Senior Secured credit rating of Ba1 and BB from Moody's Investor Services, Inc.
(Moody's) and Standard & Poor's Rating Services (S&P),
respectively. This fee amounts to $3.75 million annually, and is
reported as interest expense in the Company's Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
In
addition to the 5-Year Revolving Credit Facility, the Company has other
committed and uncommitted lines of credit as of September 30, 2008 totaling $50
million and $497 million, respectively. These lines primarily support
borrowing needs of the Company’s subsidiaries, which include term loans,
overdraft coverage, letters of credit and revolving credit
lines. Interest rates and other terms of borrowing under these lines
of credit vary from country to country, depending on local market
conditions. Total outstanding borrowings against these other
committed and uncommitted lines of credit as of September 30, 2008 were $4
million and $1 million, respectively. These outstanding borrowings
are reflected in the short-term borrowings in the accompanying Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position as of September 30, 2008.
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $134
million and surety bonds in the amount of $66 million primarily to ensure the
payment of possible casualty and workers' compensation claims, environmental
liabilities, and to support various customs and trade activities.
Debt
Shelf Registration and Convertible Securities
On
September 5, 2003, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3
(the primary debt shelf registration) for the issuance of up to $2.0 billion of
new debt securities. Pursuant to Rule 429 under the Securities Act of
1933, $650 million of remaining unsold debt securities under a prior shelf
registration statement were included in the primary debt shelf registration,
thus giving the Company the ability to issue up to $2.65 billion in public
debt. After issuance of $500 million in notes in October 2003, the
remaining availability under the primary debt shelf registration was $2.15
billion. The existing shelf registration is set to expire in December
2008. While the Company has no current intentions to access
borrowings under the shelf registration, the Company’s intent is to renew the
shelf registration.
The
Company has $575 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes
due 2033 (the Convertible Securities) on which interest accrues at the rate of
3.375% per annum and is payable semiannually. The Convertible
Securities are unsecured and rank equally with all of the Company’s other
unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The Convertible Securities
may be converted, at the option of the holders, to shares of the Company’s
common stock if the Company’s Senior Unsecured credit rating assigned to the
Convertible Securities by either Moody’s or S&P is lower than Ba2 or BB,
respectively. At the Company's current Senior Unsecured credit
rating, the Convertible Securities may be converted by their
holders.
The
Company's $1.0 billion 5-year Committed Revolving Credit Facility, along with
other committed and uncommitted credit lines, and cash balances, provide the
Company with adequate liquidity to meet its working capital and investing
needs.
Credit Quality
Moody's
and S&P's ratings for the Company, including their outlooks, as of the
filing date of this Form 10-Q are as follows:
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Most
|
|
Secured
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
|
Recent
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
|
Outlook
|
|
Update
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moody's
|
Ba1
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
B2 |
|
Stable
|
|
May
7, 2007
|
S&P
|
BB
|
|
|
B+ |
|
|
B |
|
Stable
|
|
April
23, 2008
|
On April
23, 2008, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) reconfirmed its ratings and changed
its outlook for the Company from negative to stable. Standard &
Poor’s reconfirmed its ratings and stable outlook on August 1,
2008.
The
Company is in compliance with all covenants or other requirements set forth in
its credit agreements and indentures. Further, the Company does not
have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of
its debt. However, the Company could be required to increase the
dollar amount of its letters of credit or provide other financial support up to
an additional $64 million at the current credit ratings. As of the
filing date of this Form 10-Q, the Company has not been requested to materially
increase its letters of credit or other financial support. Downgrades
in the Company’s credit rating or disruptions in the capital markets could
impact borrowing costs and the nature of its funding alternatives.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company guarantees debt and other obligations of certain
customers. The debt and other obligations are primarily due to banks
and leasing companies in connection with financing of customers' purchases of
product and equipment from the Company. As of September 30, 2008, the
following customer guarantees were in place:
(in
millions)
|
|
As
of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Maximum Amount
|
|
|
Amount Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
amounts due to banks and leasing companies
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
Other
third-parties
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
guarantees of customer debt and other obligations
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
guarantees for the third party debt, presented in the table above, mature
between 2008 and 2013. The customer financing agreements and related
guarantees typically have a term of 90 days for product and short-term equipment
financing arrangements, and up to five years for long-term equipment financing
arrangements. These guarantees would require payment from the Company
only in the event of default on payment by the respective debtor. In
some cases, particularly for guarantees related to equipment financing, the
Company has collateral or recourse provisions to recover and sell the equipment
to reduce any losses that might be incurred in connection with the
guarantees.
The
Company believes it is unlikely that material payments will be required under
any of the guarantees disclosed above. However, if the global
economic environment were to continue to deteriorate or a prolonged recession
were to occur, the likelihood of payments under these guarantees may
increase. With respect to the guarantees that the Company issued in
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company assessed the fair value of its
obligation to stand ready to perform under these guarantees by considering the
likelihood of occurrence of the specified triggering events or conditions
requiring performance as well as other assumptions and factors.
Eastman
Kodak Company (“EKC”) also guarantees debt owed to banks and other third parties
for some of its consolidated subsidiaries. The maximum amount
guaranteed is $517 million, and the outstanding debt under those guarantees,
which is recorded within the short-term borrowings and long-term debt, net of
current portion components in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position, is $187 million. These guarantees expire in 2009
through 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Company's $2.7 billion
Senior Secured Credit Agreement dated October 18, 2005, obligations under the
$2.7 billion Secured Credit Facilities (the “Credit Facilities”) and other
obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries to the Credit Facilities’
lenders are guaranteed.
During
the fourth quarter of 2007, EKC issued a guarantee to Kodak Limited (the
“Subsidiary”) and the Trustees (the “Trustees”) of the Kodak Pension Plan of the
United Kingdom (the “Plan”). Under this arrangement, EKC guarantees
to the Subsidiary and the Trustees the ability of the Subsidiary, only to the
extent it becomes necessary to do so, to (1) make contributions to the Plan to
ensure sufficient assets exist to make plan benefit payments, and (2) make
contributions to the Plan such that it will achieve full funded status by the
funding valuation for the period ending December 31, 2015. The
guarantee expires upon the conclusion of the funding valuation for the period
ending December 31, 2015 whereby the Plan achieves full funded status or
earlier, in the event that the Plan achieves full funded status for two
consecutive funding valuation cycles which are typically performed at least
every three years. The limit of potential future payments is
dependent on the funding status of the Plan as it fluctuates over the term of
the guarantee. Currently, the Plan’s local funding valuation is in
process and expected to be completed by March 2009. As of September
30, 2008 management believes that performance under this guarantee by EKC is
unlikely given expected investment performance and cash available at the Plan’s
sponsoring company, the Subsidiary, should future cash contributions be
needed. The funding status of the Plan is included in pension and
other postretirement liabilities presented in the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position.
The
Company issues indemnifications in certain instances when it sells businesses
and real estate, and in the ordinary course of business with its customers,
suppliers, service providers and business partners. Further, the
Company indemnifies its directors and officers who are, or were, serving at the
Company's request in such capacities. Historically, costs incurred to
settle claims related to these indemnifications have not been material to the
Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. Additionally, the fair value of the indemnifications that the
Company issued during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was not material to
the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Other
Refer to
Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Financial Statements for
discussion regarding the Company’s undiscounted liabilities for environmental
remediation costs, asset retirement obligations, and other commitments and
contingencies including legal matters.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Certain
statements in this report may be forward-looking in nature, or "forward-looking
statements" as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. For example, references to the Company's expectations
regarding its revenue, cash flow, new licensing arrangements, proceeds from
licensing arrangements, working capital, capital investments, cost of
environmental compliance, results of litigation, cost of retirement related
benefits, guarantees, depreciation, receivables, rationalization charges, and
savings from rationalization charges are forward-looking
statements.
Actual
results may differ from those expressed or implied in forward-looking
statements. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent the
Company's estimates only as of the date they are made, and should not be relied
upon as representing the Company's estimates as of any subsequent
date. While the Company may elect to update forward-looking
statements at some point in the future, the Company specifically disclaims any
obligation to do so, even if its estimates change. The
forward-looking statements contained in this report are subject to a number of
factors and uncertainties, including the successful:
·
|
execution
of the digital growth and profitability strategies, business model and
cash plan;
|
·
|
execution
of our restructuring and rationalization
activities;
|
·
|
management
of the Company’s global shared services model including its outsourced
functions;
|
·
|
implementation
of, and performance under, the debt management program, including
compliance with the Company's debt
covenants;
|
·
|
development
and implementation of product go-to-market and e-commerce
strategies;
|
·
|
protection,
enforcement and defense of the Company's intellectual property, including
defense of its products against the intellectual property challenges of
others;
|
·
|
execution
of intellectual property licensing programs and other
strategies;
|
·
|
integration
of the Company's businesses to SAP, the Company's enterprise system
software;
|
·
|
execution
of the Company’s planned process driven productivity
gains;
|
·
|
commercialization
of the Company’s breakthrough
technologies;
|
·
|
expansion
of the Company’s product portfolios in each of its core
businesses;
|
·
|
ability
to accurately predict product, customer and geographic sales mix and
seasonal sales trends;
|
·
|
management
of inventories and capital
expenditures;
|
·
|
integration
of acquired businesses and consolidation of the Company's
subsidiary structure;
|
·
|
improvement
in manufacturing productivity and
techniques;
|
·
|
improvement
in working capital management and cash conversion
cycle;
|
·
|
continued
availability of essential components and services from concentrated
sources of supply;
|
·
|
performance
under the Company’s share repurchase
program;
|
·
|
improvement
in supply chain efficiency and dependability;
and
|
·
|
implementation
of the strategies designed to address the decline in the Company's
traditional businesses.
|
The
forward-looking statements contained in this report are subject to the following
additional risk factors:
·
|
inherent
unpredictability of currency fluctuations, commodity prices and raw
material costs;
|
·
|
competitive
actions, including pricing;
|
·
|
uncertainty
generated by volatility in the financial
markets;
|
·
|
the
nature and pace of technology
evolution;
|
·
|
changes
to accounting rules and tax laws, as well as other factors which could
impact the Company's reported financial position or effective tax
rate;
|
·
|
pension
and other postretirement benefit cost factors such as actuarial
assumptions, market performance, and employee retirement
decisions;
|
·
|
general
economic, business, geo-political and regulatory conditions or
unanticipated environmental liabilities or
costs;
|
·
|
changes
in market growth;
|
·
|
continued
effectiveness of internal controls;
and
|
·
|
other
factors and uncertainties disclosed from time to time in the Company's
filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
|
Any
forward-looking statements in this report should be evaluated in light of these
important factors and uncertainties.
The
Company, as a result of its global operating and financing activities, is
exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and
interest rates, which may adversely affect its results of operations and
financial position. In seeking to minimize the risks associated with
such activities, the Company may enter into derivative contracts. The
Company does not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes.
Foreign
currency forward contracts are used to hedge existing foreign currency
denominated assets and liabilities, especially those of the Company’s
International Treasury Center, as well as forecasted foreign currency
denominated intercompany sales. Silver forward contracts are used to
mitigate the Company’s risk to fluctuating silver prices.
The
Company’s exposure to changes in interest rates results from its investing and
borrowing activities used to meet its liquidity needs. Long-term debt
is generally used to finance long-term investments, while short-term debt is
used to meet working capital requirements.
Using a
sensitivity analysis based on estimated fair value of open foreign currency
forward contracts using available forward rates, if the U.S. dollar had been 10%
stronger at September 30, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of open forward
contracts would have decreased $32 million and $40 million,
respectively. Such losses would be substantially offset by gains from
the revaluation or settlement of the underlying positions hedged.
Using a
sensitivity analysis based on estimated fair value of open silver forward
contracts using available forward prices, if available forward silver prices had
been 10% lower at September 30, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of open forward
contracts would have decreased $3 million and $5 million,
respectively. Such losses in fair value, if realized, would be offset
by lower costs of manufacturing silver-containing products.
The
Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowing
activities and, to a lesser extent, through investments in marketable
securities. The Company may utilize borrowings to fund its working
capital and investment needs. The majority of short-term and
long-term borrowings are in fixed-rate instruments. There is inherent
roll-over risk for borrowings and marketable securities as they mature and are
renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not
predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and business
financing requirements.
Using a
sensitivity analysis based on estimated fair value of short-term and long-term
borrowings, if available market interest rates had been 10% (about 73 basis
points) lower at September 30, 2008, the fair value of short-term and long-term
borrowings would have increased less than $1 million and $58 million,
respectively. Using a sensitivity analysis based on estimated fair
value of short-term and long-term borrowings, if available market interest rates
had been 10% (about 57 basis points) lower at September 30, 2007, the fair value
of short-term and long-term borrowings would have increased $1 million and $59
million, respectively.
The
Company’s financial instrument counterparties are high-quality investment or
commercial banks with significant experience with such
instruments. The Company manages exposure to counterparty credit risk
by requiring specific minimum credit standards and diversification of
counterparties. The Company has procedures to monitor the credit
exposure amounts. The maximum credit exposure at September 30, 2008
was not significant to the Company.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s management,
with participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were
effective.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
During
March 2005, the Company was contacted by members of the Division of Enforcement
of the SEC concerning the announced restatement of the Company's financial
statements for the full year and quarters of 2003 and the first three unaudited
quarters of 2004. An informal inquiry by the staff of the SEC into
the substance of that restatement is continuing. The Company
continues to fully cooperate with this inquiry, and the staff has indicated that
the inquiry should not be construed as an indication by the SEC or its staff
that any violations of law have occurred.
On July
9, 2008, the Company received a proposed Consent Order from the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation ("DEC”) resolving alleged violations of
the environmental quality programs at the Company's primary manufacturing
facility in Rochester, New York ("Kodak Park") which have occurred between
February 28, 2005 and June 30, 2008. These alleged violations include
violations of the solid and hazardous waste management regulations, the
facility-wide air permit and the waste water discharge permit; most were
discovered by Kodak and self-reported to the DEC. An agreement was
reached on September 23, 2008, concluding this matter, with Kodak paying
$125,000 to the DEC.
The
Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits, claims,
investigations and proceedings, including commercial, customs, employment,
environmental, and health and safety matters, which are being handled and
defended in the ordinary course of business. In addition, the Company
is subject to various assertions, claims, proceedings and requests for
indemnification concerning intellectual property, including patent infringement
suits involving technologies that are incorporated in a broad spectrum of the
Company’s products. These matters are in various stages of
investigation and litigation, and are being vigorously
defended. Although the Company does not expect that the outcome in
any of these matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition or results of operations, litigation is
inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered or
settlements entered, that could adversely affect the Company’s operating results
or cash flows in a particular period. The Company routinely assesses
all its litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately
incurring a liability, and records its best estimate of the ultimate loss in
situations where it assesses the likelihood of loss as probable.
Recent
economic trends could adversely affect our financial performance.
Economic
downturns and declines in consumption in the Company’s global markets may affect
the levels of both commercial and consumer sales and
profitability. As widely reported, the global financial markets have
been experiencing extreme disruption in recent months, including severely
diminished liquidity and credit availability. Concurrently, economic
weakness has begun to accelerate globally. The Company believes these
conditions have not materially impacted its financial position as of September
30, 2008 or liquidity for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. However, the Company could be negatively impacted if either of
these conditions exists for a sustained period of time, or if there is further
deterioration in financial markets and major economies. First, the
current tightening of credit in financial markets may adversely affect the
ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for significant
purchases and operations, which could result in a decrease in, or cancellation
of, orders for our products and services. In addition, because
purchases of Kodak’s consumer products are, to a significant extent,
discretionary, weakening economic conditions and outlook may result in a further
decline in the level of consumer spending that could adversely affect Kodak’s
results of operations and liquidity. The Company is unable to predict
the likely duration and severity of the current disruption in financial markets
and adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and its other major markets outside
the U.S.
Our
future pension and other postretirement plan costs and required level of
contributions could be unfavorably impacted by changes in actuarial assumptions
and future market performance of plan assets which could adversely affect our
financial position, results of operations, and cash flow.
We have
significant defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit
obligations. The Company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plans, which
include the Company’s most significant defined benefit pension plan, were
overfunded by more than $2.1 billion as of December 31,
2007. (Additional information about the funded status of our U.S. and
non-U.S. benefit plans is available in Note 10, “Retirement Plans and Other
Postretirement Benefits.”) Nevertheless, the funded status of these
plans and our other benefit plans, and the related cost reflected in our
financial statements, are affected by various factors that are subject to an
inherent degree of uncertainty, particularly in the current economic
environment. Key assumptions used to value these benefit
obligations, funded status and expense recognition include the discount rate for
future payment obligations, the long-term expected rate of return on plan
assets, salary growth, healthcare cost trend rate, and other economic and
demographic factors. Significant differences in actual experience or
significant changes in future assumptions could lead to a potential future need
to contribute cash or assets to our plans and could have an adverse effect on
the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flow.
If
we do not timely implement our planned working capital improvements, this could
adversely affect our cash flow.
Unanticipated
delays in the Company's plans to continue working capital improvements could
adversely impact the Company’s cash flow. Planned inventory
reductions could be compromised by slower sales due to the deteriorating
economic environment, the competitive environment for digital products, and the
continuing decline in demand for traditional products, which could also place
pressures on Kodak’s sales and market share. Conversely, accounts
receivable goals could be missed due to a decline in our customers’ ability to
pay as a result of the recent economic downturn. In addition, if the
Company does not make the expected progress to align our accounts payable
metrics with our peer groups, our cash flow could be negatively
impacted. In the event Kodak is unable to successfully manage these
issues in a timely manner, they could adversely impact the planned working
capital improvement.
If
we do not effectively execute on our growth initiatives, our financial
performance could be adversely affected.
The
Company participates in digital product markets dominated by a few, large
competitors with broad, well-established distribution channels and supplier
arrangements. Achievement of scale, in those markets where Kodak has
nascent, but growing, businesses, is necessary for the Company to successfully
compete in these markets. The Company’s failure to obtain sustainable
growth in these businesses could adversely affect the Company’s financial
performance.
If
we fail to comply with the covenants contained in our Secured Credit Agreement,
including the two financial covenants, our ability to meet our financial
obligations could be severely impaired.
There are
affirmative, negative and financial covenants contained in the Company’s Secured
Credit Agreement. These covenants are typical for a secured credit
agreement of this nature. The Company’s failure to comply with these
covenants could result in a default under the Secured Credit
Agreement. If an event of default was to occur and is not waived by
the lenders, then all outstanding debt, letters of credit, interest and other
payments under the Secured Credit Agreement could become immediately due and
payable and any unused borrowing availability under the revolving credit
facility of the Secured Credit Agreement could be terminated by the
lenders. The failure of the Company to repay any accelerated debt
under the Secured Credit Agreement could result in acceleration of the majority
of the Company’s unsecured outstanding debt obligations.
If
we cannot effectively anticipate technology trends and develop new products to
respond to changing customer preferences, this could adversely affect our
revenues.
Due to
changes in technology and customer preferences, the market for traditional
photography products and services is in decline. In its Film,
Photofinishing and Entertainment Group, the Company continues to experience
declines in customer demand for film products, consistent with industry
trends. Management has developed initiatives to address the
anticipated impact of these trends on the Company’s performance. In
addition, the Company’s product development efforts are focused on digital
capture devices (digital cameras and scanners) designed to improve the image
acquisition or digitalization process, software products designed to enhance and
simplify the digital workflow, output devices (thermal and inkjet printers and
commercial printing systems and solutions) designed to produce high quality
documents and images, and media (thermal and silver halide) optimized for
digital workflows. Kodak’s success depends in part on its ability to
develop and introduce new products and services in a timely manner that keep
pace with technological developments and that are accepted in the
market. The Company continues to introduce new consumer and
commercial digital product offerings. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be successful in anticipating and developing new
products, product enhancements or new solutions and services to adequately
address changing technologies and customer requirements. In addition,
if the Company is unable to anticipate and develop improvements to its current
technology, to adapt its products to changing customer preferences or
requirements or to continue to produce high quality products in a timely and
cost-effective manner in order to compete with products offered by its
competitors, this could adversely affect the revenues of the
Company.
If we cannot continue to license or
enforce the intellectual property rights on which our business depends or
if third parties assert
that we violate their intellectual property rights our revenue, earnings and
expenses may be adversely impacted.
Kodak
relies upon patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws in the United
States and similar laws in other countries, and agreements with its employees,
customers, suppliers and other parties, to establish, maintain and enforce its
intellectual property rights. Any of the Company’s direct or indirect
intellectual property rights could, however, be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented, or such intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to
permit the Company to take advantage of current market trends or otherwise to
provide competitive advantages, which could result in costly product redesign
efforts, discontinuance of certain product offerings or other competitive
harm. Further, the laws of certain countries do not protect
proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United
States. Therefore, in certain jurisdictions, Kodak may be unable to
protect its proprietary technology adequately against unauthorized third party
copying or use, which could adversely affect its competitive
position. Also, because of the rapid pace of technological change in
the information technology industry, much of our business and many of our
products rely on key technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and we
may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from
these third parties at all or on reasonable terms.
Kodak has
made substantial investments in new, proprietary technologies and has filed
patent applications and obtained patents to protect its intellectual property
rights in these technologies as well as the interests of the Company’s
licensees. The execution and enforcement of licensing agreements
protects the Company's intellectual property rights and provides a revenue
stream in the form of royalties that enables Kodak to further innovate and
provide the marketplace with new products and services. There is no
assurance that such measures alone will be adequate to protect the Company's
intellectual property. The Company’s ability to execute its
intellectual property licensing strategies could also affect the Company’s
revenue and earnings. Kodak’s failure to develop and properly manage
new intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s market positions
and business opportunities. Furthermore, the Company’s failure to
identify and implement licensing programs, including identifying appropriate
licensees, could adversely affect the profitability of Kodak’s
operations.
Finally,
third parties may claim that the Company or customers indemnified by Kodak are
infringing upon their intellectual property rights. Such claims may
be made by competitors seeking to block or limit Kodak’s access to digital
markets. Additionally, in recent years, individuals and groups have
begun purchasing intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making
claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from large
companies like Kodak. Even if Kodak believes that the claims are
without merit, the claims can be time-consuming and costly to defend and
distract management’s attention and resources. Claims of intellectual
property infringement also might require the Company to redesign affected
products, enter into costly settlement or license agreements or pay costly
damage awards, or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting Kodak
from marketing or selling certain of its products. Even if the
Company has an agreement to indemnify it against such costs, the indemnifying
party may be unable to uphold its contractual agreement to Kodak. If
we cannot or do not license the infringed technology at all, license the
technology on reasonable terms or substitute similar technology from another
source, our revenue and earnings could be adversely impacted.
If
we cannot attract, retain and motivate key employees, our business could be
harmed.
In order
for the Company to be successful, we must continue to attract, retain and
motivate executives and other key employees, including technical, managerial,
marketing, sales, research and support positions. Hiring and
retaining qualified executives, research professionals, and qualified sales
representatives are critical to the Company’s future and competition for
experienced employees in the industries in which we compete can be
intense. The market for employees with digital skills is highly
competitive and, therefore, the Company’s ability to attract such talent will
depend on a number of factors, including compensation and benefits, work
location and persuading potential employees that the Company is well-positioned
for success in the new digital markets Kodak has and will enter. The
Company also must keep employees focused on the strategic initiatives and goals
in order to be successful. If we cannot attract properly qualified
individuals, retain key executives and employees or motivate our employees, our
business could be harmed.
System
integration issues could adversely affect our revenue and earnings.
Portions
of our IT infrastructure may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of
service or product errors in connection with systems integration or migration
work that takes place from time to time; in particular, installation of SAP
within our Graphic Communications Group. We may not be successful in
implementing new systems and transitioning data, which could cause business
disruptions and be more expensive, time consuming, disruptive and
resource-intensive. Such disruption could adversely affect our
ability to fulfill orders and interrupt other processes. Delayed
sales, higher costs or lost customers resulting from these disruptions could
adversely affect our financial results and reputation.
Our
inability to effectively complete, integrate and manage acquisitions,
divestitures and other significant transactions could adversely impact our
business performance including our financial results.
As part
of our business strategy, we frequently engage in discussions with third parties
regarding possible investments, acquisitions, strategic alliances, joint
ventures, divestitures and outsourcing transactions ("transactions") and enter
into agreements relating to such transactions in order to further our business
objectives. In order to pursue this strategy successfully, we must
identify suitable candidates for and successfully complete transactions, some of
which may be large and complex, and manage post-closing issues such as the
integration of acquired companies or employees. Integration and other
risks of transactions can be more pronounced for larger and more complicated
transactions, or if multiple transactions are pursued
simultaneously. If we fail to identify and complete successfully
transactions that further our strategic objectives, we may be required to expend
resources to develop products and technology
internally, we may be at a competitive disadvantage or we may be adversely
affected by negative market perceptions, any of which may have a material
adverse effect on our revenue, gross margin and profitability.
In 2005,
Kodak completed two large business acquisitions in its Graphic Communications
Group segment in order to strengthen and diversify its portfolio of businesses,
while establishing itself as a leader in the graphic communications
market. The Company has substantially completed its extensive
restructuring of its traditional manufacturing and corporate infrastructure, but
will need to continue to rationalize all items of cost to remain
competitive. In the event that Kodak fails to effectively manage the
continuing decline of its more traditional businesses while simultaneously
integrating these acquisitions, it could fail to obtain the expected synergies
and favorable impact of these acquisitions. Such a failure could
cause Kodak to lose market opportunities and experience a resulting adverse
impact on its revenues and earnings.
Delays
in our plans to improve manufacturing productivity and control cost of
operations could negatively impact our gross margins.
Kodak’s
failure to successfully manage operational performance factors could delay or
curtail planned improvements in manufacturing productivity. Delays in
Kodak’s plans to improve manufacturing productivity and control costs of
operations, could negatively impact the gross margins of the
Company. Furthermore, if Kodak is unable to successfully negotiate
competitive raw material costs with its suppliers, or incurs adverse pricing on
certain of its commodity-based raw materials, gross margins could be adversely
impacted.
We
depend on third party suppliers and, therefore, our revenue and gross margins
could suffer if we fail to manage supplier relationships properly.
Kodak’s
operations depend on its ability to anticipate the needs for components,
products and services and Kodak’s suppliers’ ability to deliver sufficient
quantities of quality components, products and services at reasonable prices in
time for Kodak to meet its customers’ demand. Given the wide variety
of products, services and systems that Kodak offers, the large number of
suppliers and contract manufacturers the Company depends upon that are dispersed
across the globe, and the long lead times that are required to manufacture,
assemble and deliver certain components and products, problems could arise in
planning production and managing inventory levels that could seriously harm
Kodak. Other supplier problems that Kodak could face include
component shortages, excess supply, risks related to terms of its contracts with
suppliers, and risks related to dependency on single source
suppliers.
We
have outsourced a significant portion of our overall worldwide manufacturing and
back-office operations and face the risks associated with relying on third party
manufacturers and external suppliers.
We have
outsourced a significant portion of our overall worldwide manufacturing,
customer support and administrative operations (such as human resource, credit
and collection, and general ledger accounting functions) to third parties and
various service providers. To the extent that we rely on third party
manufacturing relationships, we face the risk that those manufacturers may not
be able to develop manufacturing methods appropriate for our products, they may
not be able to maintain an adequate control environment, they may not be able to
quickly respond to changes in customer demand for our products, they may not be
able to obtain supplies and materials necessary for the manufacturing process,
they may experience labor shortages and/or disruptions, manufacturing costs
could be higher than planned and the reliability of our products could
decline. If any of these risks were to be realized, and assuming
alternative third-party manufacturing relationships could not be established, we
could experience interruptions in supply or increases in costs that might result
in our being unable to meet customer demand for our products, damage to our
relationships with our customers, and reduced market share, all of which could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
If
our ongoing efforts to improve our supply chain efficiency are not achieved,
this could adversely affect our revenue and earnings.
Kodak’s
improvement in supply chain efficiency, if not achieved, could adversely affect
its business by preventing shipments of certain products to be made in their
desired quantities and in a timely and cost-effective manner. The
ongoing efficiencies could be compromised if Kodak expands into new markets with
new applications that are not fully understood or if the portfolio broadens
beyond that anticipated when the plans were initiated. Any unforeseen
changes in manufacturing capacity could also compromise our supply chain
efficiencies.
The
competitive pressures we face could harm our revenue, gross margins and market
share.
The
markets in which we do business are highly competitive, and we encounter
aggressive price competition for all our products and services from numerous
companies globally. Over the past several years, price competition in
the market for digital products (including consumer inkjet printers), film and
services has been particularly intense as competitors have aggressively cut
prices and lowered their profit margins for these products. In the
Graphic Communications Group segment, aggressive pricing tactics by our
competitors have intensified the contract negotiation process. Our
results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by these
and other industry-wide pricing pressures. If the Company is unable
to obtain pricing or programs sufficiently competitive with current and future
competitors, Kodak could also lose market share, adversely affecting its revenue
and gross margins.
If
we fail to manage distribution of our products and services properly, our
revenue, gross margins and earnings could be adversely impacted.
The
Company uses a variety of different distribution methods to sell our products
and services, including third-party resellers and distributors and both direct
and indirect sales to both enterprise accounts and
customers. Successfully managing the interaction of direct and
indirect channels to various potential customer segments for our products and
services is a complex process. Moreover, since each distribution
method has distinct risks and costs, our failure to implement the most
advantageous balance in the delivery model for our products and services could
adversely affect our revenue, gross margins and earnings. Due to
changes in the Company’s go-to-market models, the Company is more reliant on
fewer distributors. This has concentrated the Company’s credit risk,
which, if not appropriately managed, could result in an adverse impact on the
Company’s financial performance.
We
may provide financing and financial guarantees to our customers, some of which
may be for significant amounts.
The
competitive environment in which we operate may require us to provide financing
to our customers in order to win a contract. Customer financing
arrangements may include all or a portion of the purchase price for our products
and services. We may also assist customers in obtaining financing
from banks and other sources and may provide financial guarantees on behalf of
our customers. Our success may be dependent, in part, upon our
ability to provide customer financing on competitive terms and on our customers’
creditworthiness. As noted previously, the recent tightening of
credit in the global financial markets could adversely affect the ability of our
customers to obtain financing for significant purchases, which could result in a
decrease in, or cancellation of, orders for our products and
services. If we are unable to provide competitive financing
arrangements to our customers or if we extend credit to customers whose
creditworthiness deteriorates, this could adversely impact our revenues,
profitability and financial position.
Because
we sell our products and services worldwide, we are subject to changes in
currency exchange rates and interest rates that may adversely impact our results
of operations and financial position.
Kodak, as
a result of its global operating and financing activities, is exposed to changes
in currency exchange rates and interest rates, which may adversely affect its
results of operations and financial position. Exchange rates and
interest rates in certain markets in which the Company does business tend to be
more volatile than those in the United States and Western
Europe. There can be no guarantees that the economic situation in
developing markets or elsewhere will not worsen, which could result in future
effects on revenue and earnings should such events occur.
If
we cannot protect our reputation due to product quality and liability issues,
our business could be harmed.
Kodak
products are becoming increasingly sophisticated and complicated to design and
build as rapid advancements in technologies occur. Although Kodak has
established internal procedures to minimize risks that may arise from product
quality and liability issues, there can be no assurance that Kodak will be able
to eliminate or mitigate occurrences of these issues and associated
damages. Kodak may incur expenses in connection with, for example,
product recalls, service and lawsuits, and Kodak’s brand image and reputation as
a producer of high-quality products could suffer.
Business
disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and
increase our costs and expenses.
Our
worldwide operations could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages,
telecommunications failures, water shortages, tsunamis, floods, hurricanes,
typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics and other natural
or manmade disasters or business interruptions, for which we are predominantly
self-insured. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions
could seriously harm our revenue and financial condition and increase our costs
and expenses. In addition, some areas, including parts of the east
coast of the United States, have previously experienced, and may experience in
the future, major power shortages and blackouts. These blackouts
could cause disruptions to our operations or the operations of our suppliers,
distributors and resellers, or customers. These events could
seriously harm our revenue and financial condition, and increase our costs and
expenses.
On June
24, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new
share repurchase program allowing the Company, at management’s determination, to
purchase up to $1.0 billion of its common stock. The program will
expire at the earlier of December 31, 2009 or when the Company has used all
authorized funds for repurchase. For the three months ended September
30, 2008, the Company purchased 14,113,000 shares in open market
purchases. Since maintaining financial flexibility is critical in the
current environment, additional share repurchases will depend on the Company’s
assessment of overall economic and market conditions.
The
following table shows the share repurchase activity for each of the three months
in the quarter ended September 30, 2008:
(in
millions, except average price paid per
share)
|
Period
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs
|
|
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased under the Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
1, 2008 to July 31, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August
1, 2008 to August 31, 2008
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
16.32 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
1, 2008 to September 30, 2008
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
$ |
15.53 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Exhibits
required as part of this report are listed in the index appearing on page
56.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
EASTMAN
KODAK COMPANY
(Registrant)
Date:October
30,
2008
/s/ Diane E. Wilfong
Diane
E. Wilfong
Chief
Accounting Officer and Controller
Eastman
Kodak Company and Subsidiary Companies
Exhibit
Number
(3) A. Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended and restated May 11,
2005.
|
|
(Incorporated
by reference to the Eastman Kodak Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, Exhibit
3.)
|
|
B. By-laws,
as amended and restated May 11,
2005.
|
|
(Incorporated
by reference to the Eastman Kodak Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, Exhibit
3.)
|
|
Amendments
to Eastman Kodak Company By-Laws
|
|
(Incorporated
by reference to the Eastman Kodak Company Current Report on Form 8-K for
the date December 11, 2007, as filed on December 14, 2007, Exhibit
3.1.) |
(10)
F. Form of Administrative Guide for Leadership Stock Program
under the 2005 Omnibus Long-Term Compensation Plan.
|
(Incorporated
by reference to the Eastman Kodak Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2008, Exhibit 10.)
|