lkfn10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
[ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to _____________
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana |
0-11487 |
35-1559596 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer |
Of incorporation) |
|
Identification No.) |
202 East Center Street, P.O. Box 1387, Warsaw, Indiana 46581-1387
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(574) 267-6144
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (check one):
Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES NO
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at October 21, 2009: 12,442,030
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
PART I.
|
|
Page Number |
Item 1. |
|
1 |
Item 2. |
|
|
|
|
21 |
Item 3. |
|
38 |
Item 4. |
|
38 |
PART II.
|
|
Page Number |
Item 1. |
|
39 |
Item 1A. |
|
39 |
Item 2. |
|
39 |
Item 3. |
|
39 |
Item 4. |
|
40 |
Item 5. |
|
40 |
Item 6. |
|
40 |
|
|
|
Form 10-Q |
|
41 |
PART 1
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
(in thousands except for share data)
(Page 1 of 2)
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
31,188 |
|
|
$ |
57,149 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
8,072 |
|
|
|
6,858 |
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
39,260 |
|
|
|
64,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale (carried at fair value) |
|
|
407,331 |
|
|
|
387,030 |
|
Real estate mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $28,778 and $18,860 |
|
|
1,912,333 |
|
|
|
1,814,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, premises and equipment, net |
|
|
30,108 |
|
|
|
30,519 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
34,383 |
|
|
|
33,966 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
8,990 |
|
|
|
8,599 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
30,314 |
|
|
|
33,066 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,469,882 |
|
|
$ |
2,377,445 |
|
(continued)
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
(in thousands except for share data)
(Page 2 of 2)
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
231,970 |
|
|
$ |
230,716 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
1,589,061 |
|
|
|
1,654,583 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,821,031 |
|
|
|
1,885,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
122,672 |
|
|
|
137,769 |
|
U.S. Treasury demand notes |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
Total short-term borrowings |
|
|
340,235 |
|
|
|
202,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses payable |
|
|
16,535 |
|
|
|
17,163 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
40,042 |
|
|
|
90,043 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,250,168 |
|
|
|
2,227,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative perpetual preferred stock: 1,000,000 shares authorized, no par value, $1 liquidation value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,044 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
53,992 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Common stock: 90,000,000 shares authorized, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,441,930 shares issued and 12,341,593 outstanding as of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,373,080 shares issued and 12,266,849 outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
23,846 |
|
|
|
20,632 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
147,295 |
|
|
|
141,371 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(5,437 |
) |
|
|
(12,024 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost (2009 - 100,337 shares, 2008 - 106,231 shares) |
|
|
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
Total stockholders' equity |
|
|
219,625 |
|
|
|
149,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
219,714 |
|
|
|
149,969 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,469,882 |
|
|
$ |
2,377,445 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands except for share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
(Page 1 of 2)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
24,561 |
|
|
$ |
25,872 |
|
|
$ |
71,101 |
|
|
$ |
75,673 |
|
Tax exempt |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
4,335 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
|
|
11,793 |
|
Tax exempt |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
Interest on short-term investments |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Total interest income |
|
|
29,530 |
|
|
|
30,966 |
|
|
|
86,301 |
|
|
|
89,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
7,431 |
|
|
|
10,854 |
|
|
|
25,464 |
|
|
|
33,592 |
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
5,164 |
|
Long-term |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
8,268 |
|
|
|
13,694 |
|
|
|
28,486 |
|
|
|
42,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
21,262 |
|
|
|
17,272 |
|
|
|
57,815 |
|
|
|
47,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
14,952 |
|
|
|
7,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOAN LOSSES |
|
|
15,762 |
|
|
|
13,562 |
|
|
|
42,863 |
|
|
|
39,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth advisory fees |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
2,541 |
|
Investment brokerage fees |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
Loan, insurance and service fees |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
Merchant card fee income |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
Other income |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Net securities gains |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Gain on redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
Impairment on available-for-sale securities (includes total losses of $2,831, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of $2,606 recognized in other comprehensive income, pre-tax) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
5,279 |
|
|
|
6,202 |
|
|
|
16,871 |
|
|
|
17,943 |
|
(continued)
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands except for share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
(Page 2 of 2)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
7,327 |
|
|
$ |
6,411 |
|
|
$ |
20,516 |
|
|
$ |
19,113 |
|
Occupancy expense |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
Equipment costs |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
Data processing fees and supplies |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
2,662 |
|
Credit card interchange |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
11,119 |
|
|
|
7,827 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
13,097 |
|
|
|
11,942 |
|
|
|
39,937 |
|
|
|
34,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
|
|
7,944 |
|
|
|
7,822 |
|
|
|
19,797 |
|
|
|
22,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,677 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
5,267 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
13,597 |
|
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS |
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
11,706 |
|
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/loss, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss on pension and SERP plans |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on securities available for sale |
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
9,789 |
|
|
$ |
3,997 |
|
|
$ |
20,184 |
|
|
$ |
11,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES |
|
|
12,432,135 |
|
|
|
12,290,055 |
|
|
|
12,416,894 |
|
|
|
12,256,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES |
|
|
12,531,264 |
|
|
|
12,468,446 |
|
|
|
12,519,460 |
|
|
|
12,454,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Page 1 of 2)
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,598 |
|
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
14,952 |
|
|
|
7,884 |
|
Write down of other real estate owned |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Amortization of loan servicing rights |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Net change in loan servicing rights valuation allowance |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Loans originated for sale |
|
|
(108,386 |
) |
|
|
(37,940 |
) |
Net gain on sales of loans |
|
|
(1,713 |
) |
|
|
(666 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
107,798 |
|
|
|
36,227 |
|
Net gain on redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(642 |
) |
Net loss on sales of premises and equipment |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net loss on sales of other real estate |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Net gain on sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Impairment on available for sale securities |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net securities amortization |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Earnings on life insurance |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(876 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock option exercises |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
Net change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
529 |
|
Accrued expenses payable |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(4,303 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
13,021 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
26,619 |
|
|
|
15,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal paydowns of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities available for sale |
|
|
91,896 |
|
|
|
53,146 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(102,018 |
) |
|
|
(119,015 |
) |
Purchase of life insurance |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(11,441 |
) |
Net increase in total loans |
|
|
(112,955 |
) |
|
|
(199,722 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of land, premises and equipment |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Purchases of land, premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of other real estate |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(124,185 |
) |
|
|
(276,467 |
) |
(Continued)
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Page 2 of 2)
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in total deposits |
|
$ |
(64,268 |
) |
|
$ |
229,012 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
|
|
137,626 |
|
|
|
(58,874 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(50,001 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(7,091 |
) |
|
|
(5,510 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
56,044 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercise |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
72,819 |
|
|
|
255,754 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(24,747 |
) |
|
|
(5,230 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
64,007 |
|
|
|
67,691 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
39,260 |
|
|
$ |
62,461 |
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
28,778 |
|
|
$ |
44,530 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
7,705 |
|
|
|
7,245 |
|
Supplemental non-cash disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Table Amounts In thousands)
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
This report is filed for Lakeland Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Lake City Bank (the “Bank”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Also included is the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary, LCB Investments II, Inc. (“LCB
Investments”). LCB Investments also owns LCB Funding, Inc. (“LCB Funding”), a real estate investment trust.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with instructions for Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring in nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. The 2008 Lakeland Financial Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with these statements.
NOTE 2. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding for the year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,416,894 and 12,256,389, respectively. Basic
weighted average common shares outstanding for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,432,135 and 12,290,055, respectively. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options, stock awards and warrants. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,519,460 and 12,454,426, respectively. Diluted weighted
average common shares outstanding for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 12,531,264 and 12,468,446, respectively. Stock options for 121,000 and 87,000 shares for the period ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively, were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share because they were antidilutive. In addition, warrants for 396,538 shares for the periods ended September 30, 2009 were not considered in computing diluted earnings
per share because they were antidilutive. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issuance of the financial statements. The common shares included in Treasury Stock for 2009 and 2008 reflect the acquisition of 100,337 and 105,473 shares, respectively, of Lakeland Financial Corporation common stock that have been purchased under a directors’ deferred compensation plan. Because these shares are held in trust for the participants, they
are treated as outstanding when computing the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share.
NOTE 3. LOANS
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
$ |
691,012 |
|
|
$ |
652,107 |
|
Commercial real estate – owner occupied |
|
|
340,899 |
|
|
|
337,060 |
|
Commercial real estate – nonowner occupied |
|
|
242,278 |
|
|
|
212,444 |
|
Commercial real estate - multifamily loans |
|
|
25,651 |
|
|
|
25,428 |
|
Commercial real estate construction loans |
|
|
153,426 |
|
|
|
116,970 |
|
Agri-business and agricultural loans |
|
|
178,683 |
|
|
|
189,007 |
|
Residential real estate mortgage loans |
|
|
95,095 |
|
|
|
117,230 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
158,706 |
|
|
|
128,219 |
|
Installment loans and other consumer loans |
|
|
57,504 |
|
|
|
55,102 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,943,254 |
|
|
|
1,833,567 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(28,778 |
) |
|
|
(18,860 |
) |
Net deferred loan fees |
|
|
(2,143 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
Loans, net |
|
$ |
1,912,333 |
|
|
$ |
1,814,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
28,236 |
|
|
$ |
20,304 |
|
Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated |
|
$ |
5,963 |
|
|
$ |
3,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans |
|
$ |
29,255 |
|
|
$ |
21,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.48 |
% |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
18,860 |
|
|
$ |
15,801 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
14,952 |
|
|
|
7,884 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(5,338 |
) |
|
|
(5,954 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
Net loans charged-off |
|
|
(5,034 |
) |
|
|
(5,561 |
) |
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
28,778 |
|
|
$ |
18,124 |
|
NOTE 4. SECURITIES
Information related to the fair value of securities available for sale and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is provided in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Cost |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
267,278 |
|
|
|
8,832 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
258,593 |
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
74,409 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(18,158 |
) |
|
|
92,503 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
58,984 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
56,128 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
407,331 |
|
|
$ |
11,834 |
|
|
$ |
(18,316 |
) |
|
$ |
413,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,453 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
229,571 |
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
225,892 |
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
85,098 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(21,692 |
) |
|
|
106,790 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
55,651 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
55,081 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
387,030 |
|
|
$ |
5,133 |
|
|
$ |
(22,320 |
) |
|
$ |
404,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information regarding the fair value of available for sale debt securities by maturity as of September 30, 2009 is presented below. Maturity information is based on contractual maturity for all securities other than mortgage-backed securities. Actual maturities of securities may differ from
contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay the obligation without prepayment penalty.
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
6,876 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
5,027 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
36,223 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
17,518 |
|
|
|
|
65,644 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
341,687 |
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
407,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information regarding security proceeds, gross gains and gross losses are presented below.
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Gross gains |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Gross gains |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no security sales for the first three quarters in 2009 and 2008. All of the gains and losses were from calls or maturities.
Purchase premiums or discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities or over estimated lives for mortgage-backed securities. Gains and losses on sales are based on the amortized cost of the security sold and recorded on the trade date.
Information regarding the securities gain and loss activity included in accumulated other comprehensive income is presented below.
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrealized holding gain/(loss) on securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
arising during the period |
|
$ |
10,482 |
|
|
$ |
(6,945 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains)/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net income |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than temporary impairment |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net securities gain /(loss) activity during the period |
|
|
10,705 |
|
|
|
(6,984 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
(4,189 |
) |
|
|
2,788 |
|
Net of tax amount |
|
$ |
6,516 |
|
|
$ |
(4,196 |
) |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrealized holding gain/(loss) on securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
arising during the period |
|
$ |
7,099 |
|
|
$ |
(2,069 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains)/losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net income |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than temporary impairment |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Net securities gain /(loss) activity during the period |
|
|
7,322 |
|
|
|
(2,080 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
(2,830 |
) |
|
|
837 |
|
Net of tax amount |
|
$ |
4,492 |
|
|
$ |
(1,243 |
) |
Securities with carrying values of $209.8 million and $322.0 million were pledged as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, as collateral for deposits of public funds, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, borrowings from the FHLB and for other purposes as permitted or required by law.
Information regarding securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is presented below. The tables distribute the securities between those with unrealized losses for less than twelve months and those with unrealized losses for twelve months or more.
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
12,241 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
70,796 |
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
70,796 |
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
13,915 |
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
72,212 |
|
|
$ |
18,168 |
|
|
$ |
86,127 |
|
|
$ |
18,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
28,415 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
9,667 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
38,082 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
68,698 |
|
|
|
15,270 |
|
|
|
16,413 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
85,111 |
|
|
|
21,692 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
14,663 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
15,540 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
111,776 |
|
|
$ |
15,735 |
|
|
$ |
26,957 |
|
|
$ |
6,585 |
|
|
$ |
138,733 |
|
|
$ |
22,320 |
|
The number of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is presented below.
|
Less than |
|
12 months |
|
|
|
12 months |
|
or more |
|
Total |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
U.S. Government agencies |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Mortgage-backed securities |
4 |
|
4 |
|
8 |
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
0 |
|
23 |
|
23 |
State and municipal securities |
4 |
|
1 |
|
5 |
Total temporarily impaired |
8 |
|
28 |
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
U.S. Government agencies |
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Mortgage-backed securities |
12 |
|
12 |
|
24 |
Non-agency mortgage-backed securities |
19 |
|
5 |
|
24 |
State and municipal securities |
37 |
|
2 |
|
39 |
Total temporarily impaired |
68 |
|
19 |
|
87 |
All of the following are considered to determine whether or not the impairment of these securities is other-than-temporary. Seventy-one percent of the securities are backed by the U.S. Government, government agencies, government sponsored agencies or are A rated or better, except for certain non-local municipal securities. Mortgage-backed
securities which are not issued by the U.S. Government or government sponsored agencies (private label mortgage-backed securities) met specific criteria set by the Asset Liability Management Committee at their time of purchase, including having the highest rating available by either Moody’s or S&P. None of the securities have call provisions (with the exception of the municipal securities) and payments as originally agreed have been received. For the government, government-sponsored agency and municipal
securities, management had no concerns of credit losses and there was nothing to indicate that full principal will not be received. Management considered the unrealized losses on these securities to be primarily interest rate driven and did not expect material losses given current market conditions unless the securities are sold, which at this time management does not have the intent to sell nor will it more likely than not be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $74.4 million of collateralized mortgage obligations which were not issued by the federal government or government sponsored agencies, but were rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s at the time of purchase. At December 31, 2008, the Company had $85.1 million of these collateralized mortgage
obligations. Five of the 24 private label mortgage backed securities were still rated AAA/Aaa as of September 30, 2009, but nineteen were downgraded by S&P, Fitch and/or Moody’s, including sixteen which were ranked below investment grade by one or more rating agencies. For these private label mortgage-backed securities, additional analysis is performed to determine if the impairment is temporary
or other-than-temporary in which case impairment would need to be recorded for these securities. The initial analysis is based upon outside, third party reports which include projections of the cash flows of the individual securities under several different scenarios based upon assumptions as to collateral defaults, prepayment speeds, expected losses and the severity of potential losses. Based upon the initial review using the third party reports, securities may be identified for further analysis. If
any are identified, management makes assumptions as to prepayment speeds, default rates, severity of losses and lag time until losses are actually recorded for each security based upon historical data for each security and other factors. Cash flows for each security using these assumptions are generated and the net present value is computed using an appropriate discount rate (the current accounting yield) for the individual security. The net present value is then compared to the book value
of the security to determine if there is any other-than-temporary impairment that must be recorded. Based on this analysis of the private label mortgage-backed securities, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $225,000 relating to three separate securities in the third quarter of 2009, which is equal to the credit loss, establishing a new, lower amortized cost basis. Because management did not have the intent to sell nor did management believe that it was more likely than not be
required to sell these securities before the recovery of their new, lower amortized cost basis, management did not consider the remaining balances of the investment securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009.
The following table provides information about debt securities for which only a credit loss was recognized in income and other losses are recorded in other comprehensive income. The table represents both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
Accumulated Credit Losses in 2009 |
|
Balance January 1, 2009 and July 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
Additions related to other-than-temporary impairment losses not previously recognized |
|
|
225 |
|
Balance September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
Information on securities with at least one rating below investment grade as of September 30, 2009 is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/30/2009 |
1-Month |
3-Month |
6-Month |
|
|
|
Other Than |
September 30, 2009 |
Lowest |
Constant |
Constant |
Constant |
|
|
|
Temporary |
Par |
Book |
Market |
Unrealized |
Credit |
Default |
Default |
Default |
Credit |
Description |
CUSIP |
Impairment |
Value |
Value |
Value |
Gain/(Loss) |
Rating |
Rate |
Rate |
Rate |
Support |
CWALT 2006-32CB A16 |
02147XAR8 |
No |
2,268 |
2,162 |
1,316 |
(846) |
CCC |
5.41 |
3.58 |
3.23 |
10.88 |
CWHL 2006-18 2A7 |
12543WAJ7 |
No |
5,000 |
4,903 |
4,263 |
(640) |
CCC |
0.00 |
1.30 |
0.63 |
4.89 |
CWALT 2005-J10 1A7 |
12667G4N0 |
No |
5,011 |
4,961 |
4,039 |
(922) |
B- |
3.17 |
2.56 |
2.18 |
7.79 |
CWALT 2005-46CB A1 |
12667G6U2 |
No |
4,833 |
4,607 |
3,325 |
(1,282) |
CCC |
1.01 |
1.36 |
1.35 |
5.15 |
CWALT 2005-J8 1A3 |
12667GJ20 |
No |
6,734 |
6,456 |
4,731 |
(1,725) |
B- |
2.79 |
0.91 |
1.20 |
6.54 |
CHASE 2006-S3 1A5 |
16162XAE7 |
No |
4,040 |
4,032 |
3,132 |
(900) |
CCC |
2.66 |
1.95 |
2.72 |
5.41 |
CHASE 2006-S2 2A5 |
16163BBA1 |
No |
5,051 |
5,029 |
4,886 |
(143) |
CCC |
1.92 |
4.49 |
2.83 |
5.66 |
FHAMS 2006-FA1 1A3 |
32051GS63 |
No |
4,082 |
3,972 |
3,364 |
(608) |
CCC |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
5.00 |
GSR 2006-10F 1A1 |
36266WAC6 |
No |
6,560 |
6,103 |
4,254 |
(1,849) |
CCC |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
4.71 |
MANA 2007-F1 1A1 |
59023YAA2 |
No |
3,736 |
3,663 |
3,022 |
(641) |
CC |
0.00 |
4.32 |
2.08 |
5.53 |
RALI 2006-QS4 A2 |
749228AB8 |
Yes |
3,209 |
3,059 |
1,735 |
(1,324) |
CC |
22.89 |
13.96 |
11.28 |
3.67 |
RFMSI 2006-S5 A14 |
74957EAP2 |
No |
4,949 |
4,865 |
2,743 |
(2,122) |
CCC |
3.97 |
5.30 |
4.18 |
4.42 |
RALI 2005-QS7 A5 |
761118AE8 |
No |
5,327 |
5,064 |
3,833 |
(1,231) |
CCC |
13.64 |
6.29 |
5.54 |
11.71 |
RALI 2006-QS3 1A14 |
761118XS2 |
Yes |
3,239 |
3,074 |
2,264 |
(810) |
CC |
8.15 |
11.23 |
11.29 |
8.27 |
RAST 2006-A14C 1A2 |
76114BAB4 |
Yes |
1,629 |
1,541 |
1,068 |
(473) |
C |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
3.16 |
TBW 2006-2 3A1 |
878048AG2 |
No |
3,130 |
3,022 |
2,778 |
(244) |
C |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
7.87 |
|
|
|
68,798 |
66,513 |
50,753 |
(15,760) |
|
|
|
|
|
All of these securities are super senior or senior tranche residential non-agency mortgage-backed securities. The credit support is the credit support percentage for a tranche from other subordinated tranches, which is the amount of principal in the subordinated tranches expressed as a percentage of the remaining principal in the
super senior/senior tranche. The super senior/senior tranches receive the prepayments and the subordinate tranches absorb the losses. The super senior/senior tranches do not absorb losses until the subordinate tranches are gone.
The Company does not have a history of actively trading securities, but keeps the securities available for sale should liquidity or other needs develop that would warrant the sale of securities. While these securities are held in the available for sale portfolio, the current intent and ability is to hold them until a recovery in fair value
or maturity.
NOTE 5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
SERP Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Net pension expense |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
SERP Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Net pension expense |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 that it expected to contribute $250,000 to its pension plan and $136,000 to its SERP plan in 2009. As of September 30, 2009, $0 had been contributed to the pension plan and $0 to the
SERP plan. After discussions with the plan actuary by management, the Company does not expect to make any contributions to its pension and SERP plans in 2009.
NOTE 6. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”. This ASU provides amendments for fair value measurements of liabilities. It provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active
market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more techniques. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating a fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after
issuance or fourth quarter 2009. The Company is assessing the impact of ASU 2009-05 on our financial condition, results of operations, and disclosures.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-01 (formerly Statement No. 168), “Topic 105 - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Codification is
the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Codification does not change current GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Company adopted this standard for the interim reporting
period ending September 30, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s operating results or financial position.
NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” effective January 1, 2008, which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP.
The Company also deferred until January 1, 2009 the application of FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not recognized or disclosed at least annually at fair value. Items affected by this deferral
included goodwill, repossessions and other real estate, all for which any necessary impairment analyses are performed using fair value measurements.
FASB ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter
markets. |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities
with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and securities whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, private mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate debt securities, municipal bonds and residential mortgage loans held-for-sale. |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value can be determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for
which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes residential mortgage servicing rights. |
Securities available for sale are valued primarily by a third party pricing service. The fair values of securities available for sale are determined on a recurring basis by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or pricing models utilizing
significant observable inputs such as matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). There were no transfers from or into Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 during the third quarter of 2009.
The table below presents the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,659 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
267,278 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
267,278 |
|
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
74,409 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
74,409 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
58,984 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
58,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
406,330 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
407,331 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,685 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
229,571 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
229,571 |
|
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
85,098 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
85,098 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
55,651 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
55,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
|
$ |
386,005 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
387,030 |
|
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-fair-value accounting or write-downs of
individual assets. The table below presents the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
22,273 |
|
|
$ |
22,273 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
23,471 |
|
|
$ |
23,471 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
17,076 |
|
|
$ |
17,076 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
17,197 |
|
|
$ |
17,197 |
|
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a gross carrying amount of $28.2 million, with a valuation allowance of $5.9 million, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $2.7 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2009. In addition, $170,000 and $45,000, respectively, in impairment of mortgage servicing rights, measured using Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, was recognized during the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2009. The mortgage servicing rights impairment was recorded in loan, insurance and service fees. The Company also recognized a $50,000 reduction in value on other real estate
owned during the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2009.
The following table contains the estimated fair values and the related carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments. Items which are not financial instruments are not included.
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
39,260 |
|
|
$ |
39,260 |
|
|
$ |
64,007 |
|
|
$ |
64,007 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
407,331 |
|
|
|
407,331 |
|
|
|
387,030 |
|
|
|
387,030 |
|
Real estate mortgages held for sale |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,912,333 |
|
|
|
1,922,002 |
|
|
|
1,814,474 |
|
|
|
1,827,967 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
9,849 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
9,849 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
8,588 |
|
|
|
8,588 |
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(977,052 |
) |
|
|
(983,445 |
) |
|
|
(998,344 |
) |
|
|
(1,013,798 |
) |
All other deposits |
|
|
(843,979 |
) |
|
|
(843,978 |
) |
|
|
(886,955 |
) |
|
|
(886,955 |
) |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(122,672 |
) |
|
|
(122,672 |
) |
|
|
(137,769 |
) |
|
|
(137,769 |
) |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(217,563 |
) |
|
|
(217,637 |
) |
|
|
(64,840 |
) |
|
|
(64,840 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
(40,042 |
) |
|
|
(41,431 |
) |
|
|
(90,043 |
) |
|
|
(94,002 |
) |
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
(30,928 |
) |
|
|
(30,851 |
) |
|
|
(30,928 |
) |
|
|
(30,917 |
) |
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(9,520 |
) |
|
|
(9,520 |
) |
|
|
(9,812 |
) |
|
|
(9,812 |
) |
For purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following assumptions were used as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, demand and savings deposits, variable rate loans, variable rate short term borrowings and
accrued interest is considered to approximate cost. The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock is not determinable as there are restrictions on its transferability. The estimated fair value for fixed rate loans, certificates of deposit and fixed rate borrowings is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life. Real estate mortgages held for sale are based upon the actual contracted price for those loans sold but not yet
delivered, or the current Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation price for normal delivery of mortgages with similar coupons and maturities at year-end. The fair value of subordinated debentures is based on the rates currently available to the Company with similar term and remaining maturity. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements. The estimated fair value of other financial instruments
approximate cost and are not considered significant to this presentation.
NOTE 8. ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK
On February 27, 2009, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) 56,044 shares of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and (ii) a warrant
(the “Warrant”) to purchase 396,538 shares of the Company’s common stock, no par value (the “Common Stock”), for an aggregate purchase price of $56,044,000 in cash. This transaction was conducted in accordance with Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program implemented under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”).
The Series A Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and will pay 9% per annum thereafter. The Series A Preferred Stock is non-voting except with respect to certain matters affecting the rights of the holders thereof. The Series A Preferred Stock
was valued using a discounting of cash flows at a 12% discount rate based on an average implied cost of equity over 5 years.
The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an exercise price, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, equal to $21.20 per share of the Common Stock (trailing 20-day Lakeland average closing price as of December 17, 2008, which was the last trading day prior to date of receipt of Treasury’s preliminary
approval for our participation in the Capital Purchase Program). The Warrants were valued using the Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: Market Price of $17.45; Exercise Price of $21.20; Risk-free interest rate of 3.02%; Expected Life of 10 years; Expected Dividend rate on common stock of 4.5759% and volatility of common stock price of 41.8046%. This resulted in a value of $4.4433 per share.
The total amount of funds received were allocated to the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrant based on their respective fair values to determine the amounts recorded for each component. The method used to amortize the resulting discount on the Series A Preferred Stock is accretion over the assumed life of five years using the
effective yield.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company invested $56.0 million of the Capital Purchase Program funds received by the Bank. This additional capital positively impacted the Bank’s capital ratios and liquidity.
NOTE 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent events have been evaluated through October 26, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. There were no items that would have a material impact to the financial statements presented in this Form 10-Q.
NOTE 10. RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain amounts appearing in the financial statements and notes thereto for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation. The reclassification had no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
Part 1
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
and
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
September 30, 2009
OVERVIEW
Lakeland Financial Corporation is the holding company for Lake City Bank. The Company is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana and operates 43 offices in 12 counties in northern Indiana. The Company earned $13.6 million for the first nine months of 2009, versus $15.3 million in the same period of 2008, a decrease of 10.9%. Net income
was positively impacted by a $10.5 million increase in net interest income. Offsetting this positive impact was an increase of $7.1 million in the provision for loan losses, an increase of $5.0 million in noninterest expense and a decrease of $1.1 million in noninterest income. Basic earnings per common share for the first nine months of 2009 were $0.94 per share, versus $1.25 per share for the first nine months of 2008. Diluted earnings per common share reflect the potential
dilutive impact of stock options, stock awards and warrants. Diluted earnings per common share for the first nine months of 2009 were $0.94 per share, versus $1.23 for the first nine months of 2008. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the first nine months of 2009 were impacted by $1.9 million in dividends and accretion of discount on preferred stock.
Net income for the third quarter of 2009 was $5.3 million, an increase of 0.8% versus $5.2 million for the comparable period of 2008. The increase was driven by an increase of $4.0 million in net interest income. Offsetting this positive impact was a $1.8 million increase in the provision for loan losses as well as a
$1.2 million increase in noninterest expense and a decrease of $923,000 in noninterest income. Basic earnings per share for the third quarter of 2009 were $0.36 per share, versus $0.43 per share for the third quarter of 2008. Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of 2009 were $0.36 per share, versus $0.42 per share for the third quarter of 2008. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of 2009 were impacted by $801,000 in dividends and accretion of
discount on preferred stock.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, net interest income totaled $57.8 million, an increase of 22.3%, or $10.5 million, versus the first nine months of 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $289.4 million, or 14.4%, increase in average earning assets to $2.29 billion. In addition, the Company’s
net interest margin improved to 3.42% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, versus 3.20% for the comparable period in 2008. For the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, net interest income totaled $21.3 million, an increase of 23.1%, or $4.0 million, versus the third quarter of 2008. This increase was primarily due to a 34 basis point increase in the Company’s net interest margin to 3.69%, versus 3.35% for the third quarter of 2008. In addition, average
earning assets increased by $237.1 million, or 11.4%, to $2.322 billion in the third quarter of 2009, versus the third quarter of 2008.
Given the Company’s mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities at September 30, 2009, the Company would generally be considered to have a relatively neutral balance sheet structure. The Company’s balance sheet structure would normally be expected to produce a stable or declining net interest margin
in a declining rate environment. As the Company’s balance sheet has become more neutral in structure, management believes rate movements and other factors such as deposit mix, market deposit rate pricing and non-bank deposit products could have an impact on net interest margin. Over time, the Company’s mix of deposits has shifted to more reliance on certificates of deposits, specifically public fund deposits and brokered deposits, and corporate and public fund money market and
repurchase agreements, which generally carry a higher interest rate cost than other types of interest bearing deposits. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using the Federal Reserve Bank’s Term Auction Facility and has increased its usage through the second and third quarters.
During the first nine months of 2009, total interest and dividend income decreased by $3.3 million, or 3.7%, to $86.3 million, versus $89.6 million during the first nine months of 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the tax equivalent yield on average earning assets. The tax equivalent yield
on average earning assets decreased by 94 basis points to 5.1% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 versus the same period of 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, total interest and dividend income decreased by $1.4 million, or 4.6%, to $29.5 million, versus $31.0 million during the third quarter of 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the tax equivalent yield on average earning assets. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets
decreased by 86 basis points to 5.1% for the third quarter of 2009 versus the same period of 2008.
During the first nine months of 2009, loan interest income decreased by $4.5 million, or 6.0%, to $71.2 million, versus $75.8 million during the first nine months of 2008. The decrease was driven by a 114 basis point decrease in the tax equivalent yield on loans to 5.1%, versus 6.2% in the first
nine months of 2008, somewhat offset by a $250.6 million, or 15.4%, increase in average daily loan balances. During the third quarter of 2009, loan interest income decreased by $1.3 million, or 5.1%, to $24.6 million, versus $25.9 million during the third quarter of 2008. The decrease was driven by a 99 basis point decrease in the tax equivalent yield on loans to 5.1%, versus 6.1% in the third quarter of 2008, somewhat offset by a $220.5 million, or 13.1%, increase in average daily loan balances. In
addition, loan interest income in the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2008, was positively impacted by $1.2 million as a result of the payoff of an impaired commercial credit, which had been in nonaccrual status.
The average daily securities balances for the first nine months of 2009 increased $32.1 million, or 8.8%, to $395.4 million, versus $363.4 million for the same period of 2008. During the same periods, income from securities increased by $1.4 million, or 10.4%, to $15.0 million versus $13.6 million during the first nine months of 2008. The
increase was primarily the result of the increase in average daily securities balances, as well as a seven basis point increase in the tax equivalent yield on securities, to 5.4%, versus 5.3% in the first nine months of 2008. The average daily securities balances for the third quarter of 2009 increased $11.4 million, or 2.9%, to $401.2 million, versus $389.8 million for the same period of 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, income from securities was $4.9 million, a decrease of $88,000,
or 1.8%, versus the third quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a 23 basis point decrease in the tax equivalent yield on securities.
Total interest expense decreased $13.8 million, or 32.7%, to $28.5 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, from $42.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a 116 basis point decrease in the Company’s daily cost of funds to 1.7%, versus 2.9% for the same period of 2008. Total
interest expense decreased $5.4 million, or 39.6%, to $8.3 million for the third quarter of 2009, versus $13.7 million for the third quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of a 118 basis point decrease in the Company’s daily cost of funds to 1.5%, from 2.7% for the same period of 2008.
On an average daily basis, total deposits (including demand deposits) increased $289.0 million, or 18.4%, to $1.859 billion for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, versus $1.570 billion during the same period in 2008. The average daily balances for the third quarter of 2009 increased $175.2 million, or 10.7%, to $1.817
billion from $1.642 billion during the third quarter of 2008. On an average daily basis, noninterest bearing demand deposits were $223.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, versus $219.2 million for the same period in 2008. The average daily noninterest bearing demand deposit balances for the third quarter of 2009 were $229.6 million, versus $221.2 million for the third quarter of 2008. On an average daily basis, interest bearing transaction accounts increased
$71.1 million, or 15.1%, to $542.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, versus the same period in 2008. Average daily interest bearing transaction accounts increased $45.5 million, or 9.0%, to $553.6 million for the third quarter of 2009, versus $508.1 million for the third quarter of 2008. When comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2009 with the same period of 2008, the average daily balance of time deposits, which pay a higher rate of interest compared to
demand deposit and transaction accounts, increased $213.8 million, primarily as a result of increases in brokered time deposits and time deposits of $100,000 or more. The rate paid on time deposit accounts decreased 143 basis points to 2.8% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, versus the same period in 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, the average daily balance of time deposits increased $118.5 million, and the rate paid decreased 133 basis points to 2.5%, versus the
third quarter of 2008.
Due to strong loan growth and additional relationship opportunities, the Company continued to focus on public fund deposits as a core funding strategy. In addition, the Company has increased its usage of brokered certificates of deposits as a result of loan growth and overall liquidity and funding management. On an average daily basis, total
brokered certificates of deposit increased $90.1 million to $160.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, versus $70.1 million for the same period in 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, average daily brokered certificates of deposit were $105.9 million, versus $93.2 million during the third quarter of 2008. On an average daily basis, total public fund certificates of deposit decreased $57.7 million to $201.7 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009,
versus $259.4 million for the same period in 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, average daily public fund certificates of deposit were $181.6 million, versus $252.8 million during the third quarter of 2008. Availability of public fund deposits can be cyclical, primarily due to the timing differences between when real estate property taxes are collected versus when those tax revenues are spent, as well as the intense competition for these funds. The Company is also a member
of the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) deposit program, and initiated its participation in the program in the fourth quarter of 2008. The program is a convenient way for participating customers to enjoy full FDIC insurance coverage on large certificates of deposit, and consists of a network of financial institutions which exchange funds. The average daily balances of CDARS certificates of deposit were $73.2 million and $61.8 million, respectively, in the nine months
and three months ended September 30, 2009. There were no CDARS deposits in the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2008.
Average daily balances of borrowings were $338.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, versus $387.0 million during the same period of 2008, and the rate paid on borrowings decreased 181 basis points to 1.2%. The decrease in average borrowings was driven by decreases of $76.3 million in notes payable, $35.6 million
in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and $31.1 million in federal funds purchased. During the third quarter of 2009 the average daily balances of borrowings decreased $10.6 million to $387.0 million, versus $397.6 million for the same period of 2008, and the rate paid on borrowings decreased 198 basis points to 0.9%. On an average daily basis, total deposits (including demand deposits) and purchased funds increased 12.3% and 8.1%, respectively, when comparing the nine-month
and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 versus the same period in 2008.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company began using the Federal Reserve Bank’s Term Auction Facility (TAF). Average daily balances of borrowings under the facility were $92.9 million and $171.1 million, respectively, during the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2009. The interest rate was 0.25%
during both periods. There were no outstanding TAF borrowings prior to the first quarter of 2009.
As a result of the unprecedented instability in the financial markets during the second half of 2008 and continuing into 2009, the Company reviewed its liquidity plan and has taken several actions designed to provide for an appropriate funding strategy in this unsettled environment. These actions include: actively communicating
with correspondent banks who provide federal fund lines to ensure availability of these funds; expanded use of brokered certificate of deposits, which have been readily available to the Company at competitive rates; increased allocation of collateral at the Federal Reserve Bank for borrowings under their programs; maintenance of collateral levels at the FHLB for borrowings under their programs at advantageous rates; participation in the CDARS deposit program and an increased focus on aggressively priced and structured
core deposit programs offered by the Company, such as Rewards Checking and Savings. The Company will continue to carefully monitor its liquidity planning and will make any necessary adjustments during this environment.
The following tables set forth consolidated information regarding average balances and rates:
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY; |
|
INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL |
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Yield (1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Yield (1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable (2)(3) |
|
$ |
1,876,344 |
|
|
$ |
71,101 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
$ |
1,627,984 |
|
|
$ |
75,673 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
Tax exempt (1) |
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
|
Investments: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
395,424 |
|
|
|
15,912 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
363,367 |
|
|
|
14,445 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
16,176 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
9,293 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
2,294,411 |
|
|
|
87,218 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
2,005,027 |
|
|
|
90,430 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
39,309 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,111 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
30,305 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,402 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other nonearning assets |
|
|
76,135 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,022 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(22,738 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,257 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,417,422 |
|
|
$ |
87,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,125,305 |
|
|
$ |
90,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 35 percent tax rate for 2009 and 2008. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt securities included the TEFRA adjustment applicable to nondeductible interest expenses. |
(2) |
Loan fees, which are immaterial in relation to total taxable loan interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, are included as taxable loan interest income. |
(3) |
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of taxable loans. |
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY; |
|
INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (Cont.) |
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Yield |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
65,779 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
$ |
65,768 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
Interest bearing checking accounts |
|
|
542,598 |
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
|
471,465 |
|
|
|
7,987 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In denominations under $100,000 |
|
|
363,758 |
|
|
|
8,654 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
326,845 |
|
|
|
10,705 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
In denominations over $100,000 |
|
|
663,679 |
|
|
|
12,614 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
486,754 |
|
|
|
14,846 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
Miscellaneous short-term borrowings |
|
|
264,826 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
312,408 |
|
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
73,406 |
|
|
|
2,181 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
74,566 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
6.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,974,046 |
|
|
|
28,486 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
1,737,806 |
|
|
|
42,294 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and stockholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
223,228 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,163 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
20,092 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,352 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity |
|
|
200,056 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,984 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity |
|
$ |
2,417,422 |
|
|
$ |
28,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,125,305 |
|
|
$ |
42,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest differential - yield on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average daily earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,732 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,136 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY; |
|
INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL |
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Yield (1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Yield (1) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable (2)(3) |
|
$ |
1,903,864 |
|
|
$ |
24,561 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
$ |
1,683,423 |
|
|
$ |
25,872 |
|
|
|
6.11 |
% |
Tax exempt (1) |
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
Investments: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
401,192 |
|
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
389,817 |
|
|
|
5,291 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
13,104 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
6,949 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
2,322,134 |
|
|
|
29,835 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
|
2,085,042 |
|
|
|
31,245 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
38,705 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,839 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
30,293 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,418 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other nonearning assets |
|
|
75,173 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(26,458 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,332 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,439,847 |
|
|
$ |
29,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,208,067 |
|
|
$ |
31,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Tax exempt income was converted to a fully taxable equivalent basis at a 35 percent tax rate for 2009 and 2008. The tax equivalent rate for tax exempt loans and tax exempt securities included the TEFRA adjustment applicable to nondeductible interest expenses. |
(2) |
Loan fees, which are immaterial in relation to total taxable loan interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, are included as taxable loan interest income. |
(3) |
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of taxable loans. |
DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY; |
|
INTEREST RATES AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL (Cont.) |
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Yield |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
67,567 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
$ |
64,821 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
% |
Interest bearing checking accounts |
|
|
553,599 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
508,122 |
|
|
|
2,738 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In denominations under $100,000 |
|
|
355,923 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
326,060 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
In denominations over $100,000 |
|
|
610,014 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
521,364 |
|
|
|
4,865 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
Miscellaneous short-term borrowings |
|
|
316,033 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
276,643 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
70,970 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
120,971 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,974,106 |
|
|
|
8,268 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
1,817,981 |
|
|
|
13,694 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and stockholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
229,594 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,157 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
20,639 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity |
|
|
215,508 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,992 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity |
|
$ |
2,439,847 |
|
|
$ |
8,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,208,067 |
|
|
$ |
13,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest differential - yield on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average daily earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,567 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,551 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
Provision for Loan Losses
Based on management’s review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, provisions for loan losses of $15.0 million and $5.5 million were recorded during the nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009, versus provisions of $7.9 million and $3.7 million recorded during the same periods of 2008. Factors impacting
the provision included the amount and status of classified credits, the level of charge-offs, management’s overall view on current credit quality and the regional and national economic conditions impacting credit quality, the amount and status of impaired loans, the amount and status of past due accruing loans (90 days or more), and overall loan growth as discussed in more detail below in the analysis relating to the Company’s financial condition.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income categories for nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown in the following table:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth advisory fees |
|
$ |
2,213 |
|
|
$ |
2,541 |
|
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
Investment brokerage fees |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Loan, insurance and service fees |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
Merchant card fee income |
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
177.6 |
|
Net securities gains |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(94.9 |
) |
Gain on redemption of Visa shares |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Impairment on available-for-sale securities (includes total losses of $2,831, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of $2,606 recognized in other comprehensive income, pre-tax) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
16,871 |
|
|
$ |
17,943 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
)% |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth advisory fees |
|
$ |
747 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
Investment brokerage fees |
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
Loan, insurance and service fees |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Merchant card fee income |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
214.4 |
|
Net securities gains |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(81.8 |
) |
Impairment on available-for-sale securities (includes total losses of $2,831, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of $2,606 recognized in other comprehensive income, pre-tax) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
5,279 |
|
|
$ |
6,202 |
|
|
|
(14.9 |
)% |
Noninterest income decreased $1.1 million and $923,000, respectively, for the nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009, versus the same periods in 2008. The results for the first nine months of 2008 were positively impacted by a nonrecurring gain of $642,000 related to the Visa initial public offering, which
occurred in the first quarter of 2008. Excluding this gain, noninterest income in the nine-months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $430,000, or 2.5%, versus the same period of 2008. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased in the nine-month and three-month periods ending September 30, 2009, primarily due to decreases of $622,000 and $356,000, respectively in nonsufficient funds and overdraft fees, as customers have reined-in their spending. Also contributing to the lower noninterest
income performance was a change related to the processing of merchant credit card activities. Prior to the third quarter of 2009, transaction driven revenue and expenses related to this category were reported on a gross basis in merchant card fee income in noninterest income and credit card interchange fees in noninterest expense. Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the Company began converting clients to a new third party processor for this activity. As a result, only net
revenues with the new processor are being recognized in merchant card fee income in noninterest expense. The conversion is ongoing and will be completed by the end of 2009. This change was driven by the agreement with the third party processor, and not due to any change in the Company’s accounting policies. The Company also recognized $225,000 in non-cash other-than-temporary impairment, equal to credit losses, on available for sale securities. Noninterest income
for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2009 was positively impacted by increases in mortgage banking income. Recent declines in mortgage rates have led to greater numbers of loans refinancing as well as a larger pipeline of mortgage loan applications which, in turn, increase the amount of mortgage income.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense categories for the nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown in the following table:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
20,516 |
|
|
$ |
19,113 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
Occupancy expense |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Equipment costs |
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Data processing fees and supplies |
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Credit card interchange |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
11,119 |
|
|
|
7,827 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
39,937 |
|
|
$ |
34,937 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
7,327 |
|
|
$ |
6,411 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
Occupancy expense |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Equipment costs |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Data processing fees and supplies |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Credit card interchange |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
(53.6 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
13,097 |
|
|
$ |
11,942 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Noninterest expense increased $5.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in the nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 versus the same periods of 2008. Other expense increased by $3.3 million and $403,000, respectively, in the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2009, driven by regulatory expenses,
which increased due to higher FDIC insurance premiums. FDIC premiums increased by $2.6 million and $435,000, respectively, in the nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 versus the same periods of 2008. The effect of higher FDIC insurance premiums is impacting the banking industry as a whole and the assessments may remain higher than recent historical levels for the foreseeable future. Also impacting noninterest expense were increases in salaries and employee
benefits, which were higher in both the nine-month and three month periods of 2009. Salaries increased $1.2 million and $448,000, respectively, in the nine-month and three-month periods ended September 30, 2009, versus the same periods of 2008. The Company has added 14 full-time-equivalent positions, primarily in lending and other revenue producing areas, since September 30, 2008. In addition, employee health insurance expense increased by $443,000 and $201,000, respectively,
in the nine-month and three-month periods, versus the same periods of 2008. Also, incentive based compensation was $201,000 higher in the third quarter of 2009 versus the same period in 2008 as a result of improved performance versus key performance targets in these plans. Further impacting noninterest expense were increases in occupancy expense and data processing fees and supplies. Higher maintenance and repair costs led to the increase in occupancy expense while data processing
fees increased due to volume-driven account level activity fees and expanded technology-based client products.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense decreased $936,000, or 13.1%, for the first nine months of 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. The combined state franchise tax expense and the federal income tax expense, as a percentage of income before income tax expense, decreased to 31.3% during the first nine months of 2009 compared to 31.9% during
the same period of 2008. The combined tax expense increased to 33.7% in the third quarter of 2009, versus 33.2% during the same period of 2008. The changes were driven by fluctuations in the percentage of revenue being derived from tax-advantaged sources in the nine-month and three-month periods of 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material
changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Some of the facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include changes in interest rates, in the performance of the economy or in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. The Company’s critical accounting policies are discussed in detail in the Annual Report for the year ended December
31, 2008 (incorporated by reference as part of the Company’s 10-K filing).
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets of the Company were $2.470 billion as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $92.4 million, or 3.9%, when compared to $2.377 billion as of December 31, 2008.
Total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $24.7 million, or 38.7%, to $39.3 million at September 30, 2009 from $64.0 million at December 31, 2008.
Total securities available for sale increased by $20.3 million, or 5.3%, to $407.3 million at September 30, 2009 from $387.0 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was a result of a number of transactions in the securities portfolio. Securities purchases totaled $102.0 million. Offsetting this increase were securities paydowns
totaling $77.2 million, maturities and calls of securities totaling $14.7 million and the fair market value of the securities portfolio increased by $10.7 million. The increase in fair market value was due to higher market values for securities which are backed directly or indirectly by the federal government. The investment portfolio is managed to limit the Company’s exposure to risk by containing mostly mortgage-backed securities, other securities which are either directly or indirectly
backed by the federal government or a local municipal government and collateralized mortgage obligations rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s at the time of purchase. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $74.4 million of collateralized mortgage obligations which were not backed by the federal government, but were rated AAA by S&P and/or Aaa by Moody’s at the time of purchase.
Five of the 24 private label collateralized mortgage obligations are still rated AAA/Aaa as of September 30, 2009, but nineteen had been downgraded since the time of purchase by S&P, Fitch and/or Moody’s, including sixteen which were ranked below investment grade by one or more rating agencies. The Company, with the assistance
of an outside advisor, analyzes projections for these securities that include projections of future performance in the underlying collateral under various scenarios and under various prepayment assumptions. Based on the analyses as of September 30, 2009, the Company realized $225,000 in other than temporary impairment, equal to expected credit losses, on three of the 24 private label collateralized mortgage obligations.
Real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale increased by $1.5 million, to $1.9 million at September 30, 2009 from $401,000 at December 31, 2008. The balance of this asset category is subject to a high degree of variability depending on, among other things, recent mortgage loan rates and the timing of loan sales into the secondary market. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, $108.4 million in real estate mortgages were originated for sale and $106.1 million in mortgages were sold.
Total loans, excluding real estate mortgage loans held-for-sale, increased by $107.8 million, or 5.9%, to $1.941 billion at September 30, 2009 from $1.833 billion at December 31, 2008. The portfolio breakdown at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 reflected 84% commercial and industrial, including commercial real estate and agri-business,
13% residential real estate and home equity and 3% consumer loans. The Company did not participate in the subprime mortgage lending markets and therefore did not have direct exposure to this sector as a lender.
The Company has a high percentage of commercial and commercial real estate loans, most of which are extended to small or medium-sized businesses. Commercial loans represent higher dollar loans to fewer customers and therefore higher credit risk than other types of loans. Pricing is adjusted to manage the higher credit risk associated with
these types of loans. The Company also generally requires new and renewed variable rate commercial loans to have floor rates. The majority of fixed rate mortgage loans, which represent increased interest rate risk, are sold in the secondary market, as well as some variable rate mortgage loans. The remainder of the variable rate mortgage loans and a small number of fixed rate mortgage loans are retained.
Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the principal is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable incurred credit losses relating to specifically identified loans based on
an evaluation, as well as other probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay. Management also considers trends in adversely classified loans based upon a monthly review of those credits. An appropriate level of general allowance is determined after
considering the following factors: application of historical loss percentages, emerging market risk, commercial loan focus and large credit concentrations, new industry lending activity and current economic conditions. Federal regulations require insured institutions to classify their own assets on a regular basis. The regulations provide for three categories of classified loans – substandard, doubtful and loss. The regulations also contain a special mention category. Special mention is defined
as loans that do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification, but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management’s close attention. Assets classified as substandard or doubtful require the institution to establish specific allowances for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified as loss, the insured institution must either establish specified allowances for loan losses in the amount of 100% of the portion
of the asset classified loss, or charge off such amount. At September 30, 2009, on the basis of management’s review of the loan portfolio, the Company had loans totaling $162.5 million on the classified loan list versus $98.8 million on December 31, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $65.9 million of assets classified special mention, $96.3 million classified as substandard, $369,000 classified as doubtful and $0 classified as loss as compared to $47.2 million, $46.2 million, $5.4 million and
$0 at December 31, 2008. In addition, at September 30, 2009 the Company had two loans accounted for as troubled debt restructurings – a $179,000 mortgage loan with an allocation of $35,000, and a $6.4 million commercial credit with an allocation of $2.4 million. The Company has no commitments to lend additional funds to either borrower. There were no troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2008.
Allowance estimates are developed by management taking into account actual loss experience, adjusted for current economic conditions. The Company discusses this methodology with regulatory authorities to ensure compliance. Allowance estimates are considered a prudent measurement of the risk in the Company’s loan portfolio and are applied
to individual loans based on loan type. In accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies” and ASC Topic 310, “Receivables”, the allowance is provided for losses that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date and is based on past events and current economic conditions, and does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions.
The allowance for loan losses increased 52.6%, or $9.9 million, from $18.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $28.8 million at September 30, 2009. Pooled loan allocations increased $2.7 million from $7.0 million at December 31, 2008 to $9.7 million at September 30, 2009, which was primarily a result of higher pooled loan balances. Specific
loan allocations increased $6.1 million from $10.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $16.5 million at September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to the higher classified loan balance. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan losses increased $1.1 million from $1.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $2.6 million at September 30, 2009, based on management’s assessment of economic and other qualitative factors impacting the loan portfolio, particularly the ongoing economic
weakness in the Company’s market area. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2009 was at a level commensurate with the overall risk exposure of the loan portfolio. However, if economic conditions do not stabilize or improve, certain borrowers may experience difficulty and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies could rise and require further increases in the provision for loan losses.
Total impaired loans increased by $7.9 million to $28.2 million at September 30, 2009 from $20.3 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in the impaired loans category was primarily due to the addition of two commercial credits totaling $9.4 million. One of the credits is engaged in commercial real estate development, the other
is a real estate holding company which leased manufacturing buildings to an affiliated company involved in the recreational vehicle industry. Both real estate development and the recreational vehicles industry have been severely impacted by the current economic downturn. The increase in impaired loans was partially offset by $2.0 million in paydowns received and a $1.5 million charge-off taken on one commercial relationship. Of the $28.2 million in impaired loans, $22.9 million
were on nonaccrual status at September 30, 2009. A loan is impaired when full payment under the original loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated in the aggregate for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as residential mortgage, and consumer loans, and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing
rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. The following table summarizes nonperforming assets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
NONPERFORMING ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
23,708 |
|
|
$ |
20,810 |
|
Loans past due over 90 days and still accruing |
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
29,255 |
|
|
|
21,288 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
Repossessions |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
30,014 |
|
|
$ |
22,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
28,236 |
|
|
$ |
20,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
1.51 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets increased by $7.6 million, or 34.0%, to $30.0 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to the addition of two commercial credits to the impaired loan category, partially offset by paydowns and charge-offs on impaired commercial credits. Seven
commercial relationships represented 75.2% of total nonperforming loans. Three of the seven relationships are each less than $2.0 million. A $6.4 million credit to a manufacturer tied to the housing industry represented the largest exposure in the nonperforming category. Borrower collateral including real estate, receivables, inventory and equipment support the credit, however, there are no guarantors. The Company took a $906,000 charge-off related to this credit in
2008, and no charge-offs have been taken in 2009.
A $5.2 million loan to a company engaged in real estate development represents the second largest exposure in the nonperforming category. Borrower collateral, including real estate and the personal guarantees of its principals, support the credit and no charge-offs have yet been recognized. However, there can be no assurances
that full repayment of the loan will result. The Company has other exposure to this borrower in the form of performing loans which are secured by other collateral and guarantees.
A $4.1 million loan to a real estate holding company represents the third largest exposure in the nonperforming category. The entity leased buildings used for manufacturing to an affiliated company which is now in bankruptcy. Borrower collateral and personal guarantees support the credit. The Company took
a $1.1 million charge-off related to this credit in the third quarter of 2009.
A commercial relationship consisting of two loans totaling $2.7 million represents the fourth largest exposure in the nonperforming category. The borrower is engaged in sales tied to the recreational vehicle industry as well as residential real estate development. Borrower collateral, including real estate and the personal
guarantees of its principals, support the credit. However, there can be no assurances that full repayment of the loans will result. The Company took $1.3 million in charge-offs related to this relationship during 2008, and no charge-offs have been taken in 2009.
Management does not foresee a rapid recovery from the current distressed economic conditions in the Company’s markets as certain industries, including residential and commercial real estate development, recreational vehicle and mobile home manufacturing and other regional industries continue to experience general slow-downs and negative
growth. The Company’s continued growth strategy promotes diversification among industries as well as a continued focus on enforcement of a strong credit environment and an aggressive position on loan work-out situations. While the Company believes that the impact of these industry-specific issues will be somewhat mitigated by its overall growth strategy, the economic recession impacting its entire geographic footprint will continue to present challenges. Additionally, the
Company’s overall asset quality position can be influenced by a small number of credits due to the focus on commercial lending activity and the granularity inherent in this strategy.
Total deposits decreased by $64.3 million, or 3.4%, to $1.821 billion at September 30, 2009 from $1.885 billion at December 31, 2008. The decrease resulted from decreases of $160.1 million in brokered deposits, $96.6 million in interest bearing transaction accounts, primarily public fund deposit accounts, and $13.9 million in other certificates
of deposit. Offsetting these decreases were increases of $99.9 million in certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over, $46.1 million in public fund certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, $41.6 million in money market accounts, $10.7 million in savings accounts, $6.7 million in CDARS certificates of deposit and $1.3 million in demand deposits.
Total short-term borrowings increased by $137.6 million, or 67.9%, to $340.2 million at September 30, 2009 from $202.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase resulted primarily from increases of $130.0 million in other borrowings, primarily from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s Term Auction Facility and $21.0 million
in federal funds purchased. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $15.1 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase. In addition, long-term borrowings decreased by $50.0 million, primarily from long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis.
Total equity increased by $69.7 million, or 46.5%, to $219.7 million at September 30, 2009 from $150.0 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was driven by the February 2009 issuance of 56,044 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury in accordance with the Treasury’s Capital
Purchase Program implemented under the Troubled Assets Relief Program. Preferred stock totaled $54.0 million, net of unearned discount of $2.1 million, at September 30, 2009 versus $0 at December 31, 2008. The remainder of the increase in total equity resulted from net income of $13.6 million, plus the decrease in the accumulated other comprehensive loss of $6.6 million, less dividends of $7.1 million, plus $724,000 for stock issued through options exercised (including tax benefit), minus
$215,000 for net treasury stock purchased plus $233,000 in stock compensation expense, comprised most of this increase.
The FDIC’s risk based capital regulations require that all insured banking organizations maintain an 8.0% total risk based capital ratio. The FDIC has also established definitions of “well capitalized” as a 5.0% Tier I leverage capital ratio, a 6.0% Tier I risk based capital ratio and a 10.0% total risk based capital ratio.
All of the Bank’s ratios continue to be above these “well capitalized” levels. The Federal Reserve also has established minimum regulatory capital requirements for bank holding companies. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had regulatory capital in excess of these minimum requirements with a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio, Tier 1 risk based capital ratio and total risk based capital ratio of 10.2%, 11.8% and 13.0%, respectively.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to the financial condition, results of operations,
plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,”
“should” or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
The Company’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. The factors, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries are detailed in the “Risk Factors” section included under Item 1a. of Part
I of our Form 10-K. In addition to the risk factors described in that section, there are other factors that may impact any public company, including ours, which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company and its subsidiaries. These additional factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
· |
The economic impact of past and any future terrorist attacks, acts of war or threats thereof and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks. |
· |
The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation. |
· |
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. |
· |
The ability of the Company to manage risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated. |
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk represents the Company’s primary market risk exposure. The Company does not have a material exposure to foreign currency exchange risk, does not have any material amount of derivative financial instruments and does not maintain a trading portfolio. The board of directors annually reviews and approves the policy used
to manage interest rate risk. The policy was last reviewed and approved in May 2009. The policy sets guidelines for balance sheet structure, which are designed to protect the Company from the impact that interest rate changes could have on net income, but does not necessarily indicate the effect on future net interest income. The Company, through its Asset/Liability Committee, manages interest rate risk by monitoring the computer simulated earnings impact of various rate scenarios and general market conditions.
The Company then modifies its long-term risk parameters by attempting to generate the type of loans, investments, and deposits that currently fit the Company’s needs, as determined by the Asset/Liability Committee. This computer simulation analysis measures the net interest income impact of various interest rate scenario changes during the next 12 months. If the change in net interest income is less than 3% of primary capital, the balance sheet structure is considered to be within acceptable risk levels.
September 30, 2009, the Company’s potential pretax exposure was within the Company’s policy limit, and not significantly different from December 31, 2008.
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, management has evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective as of September 30, 2009. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, there were no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2009
Part II - Other Information
Item 1. Legal proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routinelitigation incidental to their respective businesses.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1a. to Part I of the Company’s 2008 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information as of September 30, 2009 with respect to shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter then ended:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Appropriate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value) of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1-31 |
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
$ |
18.33 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
August 1-31 |
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
19.91 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
September 1-30 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,984 |
|
|
$ |
18.58 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
(a) |
The shares purchased during the periods were credited to the deferred share accounts of |
|
non-employee directors under the Company’s directors’ deferred compensation plan. These
shares were purchased in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice. |
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
10.1 |
Lakeland Financial Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
31.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
32.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2009
Part II - Other Information
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
Date: October 26, 2009 |
/s/ Michael L. Kubacki |
|
Michael L. Kubacki – President and Chief |
|
Executive Officer |
Date: October 26, 2009 |
/s/ David M. Findlay |
|
David M. Findlay – Executive Vice President |
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: October 26, 2009 |
/s/ Teresa A. Bartman |
|
Teresa A. Bartman – Vice President |
|
and Controller |