UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________________________________ to ________________________________
Commission File Number 1-9789
SEVCON, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
04-2985631
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
155 Northboro Road, Southborough, Massachusetts 01772
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(508) 281-5510
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Outstanding at May 11, 2012
|
Common stock, par value $.10
|
3,485,322
|
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
INDEX
|
PAGE
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5-13
|
|
|
|
13-18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19-20
|
|
|
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20-21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures |
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Sevcon, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands of dollars except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(derived from audited statements)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
Trade receivables net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $51 at March 31, 2012
and $49 at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
5,315 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
18,193 |
|
|
|
16,508 |
|
Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost
|
|
|
|
11,165 |
|
|
|
10,648 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
(8,893 |
) |
|
|
(8,401 |
) |
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
Long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$ |
24,647 |
|
|
$ |
22,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
4,907 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
Accrued and deferred taxes on income
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
6,558 |
|
|
|
6,010 |
|
Liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
|
7,760 |
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
16,113 |
|
|
|
15,457 |
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.10 per share – authorized – 1,000,000 shares;
outstanding – none
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock, par value $.10 per share – authorized – 8,000,000 shares;
Outstanding 3,485,322 shares at March 31, 2012 and 3,360,322 shares at
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Premium paid in on common stock
|
|
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
9,221 |
|
|
|
8,467 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
(6,445 |
) |
|
|
(6,608 |
) |
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
8,534 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
$ |
24,647 |
|
|
$ |
22,947 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Sevcon, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$ |
10,101 |
|
|
$ |
7,787 |
|
|
$ |
18,616 |
|
|
$ |
14,670 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
(6,479 |
) |
|
|
(5,099 |
) |
|
|
(12,012 |
) |
|
|
(9,614 |
) |
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
Selling, research and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(4,816 |
) |
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Foreign currency (loss) gain
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
Income taxes provision
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Basic income per share
|
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
Fully diluted income per share
|
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
Sevcon, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
917 |
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Sevcon, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Pension contributions less than pension expense
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Deferred tax provision
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(733 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
555 |
|
Accrued and deferred taxes on income
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
Cash flow (used by) generated from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
Proceeds of sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
Net cash (used by) generated from investing activities
|
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
864 |
|
Cash flow used by financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long term debt
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
311 |
|
Beginning balance – cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
Ending balance – cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – March 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Sevcon, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation organized on December 22, 1987 to carry on the electronic controls business previously performed by Tech/Ops, Inc. Through wholly-owned subsidiaries located in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, South Korea and Japan, the Company designs and sells, under the Sevcon name, microprocessor based controls for zero emission and hybrid electric vehicles. The controls are used to vary the speed and movement of vehicles, to integrate specialized functions and to prolong the shift life of vehicles’ power source. The Company’s customers are manufacturers of on-road, off-road and industrial vehicles including automobiles, buses, fork lift trucks, aerial lifts, mining vehicles, airport ground support vehicles, utility vehicles, sweepers and other battery powered vehicles. Through another subsidiary located in the United Kingdom, Sevcon, Inc manufactures special metalized film capacitors that are used as components in the power electronics, signaling and audio equipment markets.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normally recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position of Sevcon, Inc. as of March 31, 2012 and the results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended March 31, 2012. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2011 annual consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the 2011 Sevcon, Inc. Annual Report filed on Form 10-K (the “2011 10-K”). Unless otherwise indicated, each reference to a year means the Company’s fiscal year, which ends on September 30.
The results of operations for the six month period ended March 31, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
(2) Summary of significant accounting policies
Other than the new accounting pronouncement as set forth in Note 3 below, there have been no changes since the end of 2011 to the significant accounting policies followed by Sevcon, Inc.
(3) New accounting pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, a company may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, a company is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. Regardless of choice in presentation, a company is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements when implemented.
On September 15, 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance in respect of the simplification of the testing of goodwill impairment. The Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) is, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This ASU gives an entity the option in its annual goodwill impairment test to first assess revised qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. In certain cases this will allow an entity to forego the existing two-step goodwill impairment test. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on either the Company’s consolidated results from operations or its financial position.
(4) Stock-based compensation plans
Under the Company’s 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) there were 122,800 shares reserved and available for grant at March 31, 2012. There were no options granted or exercised in the periods ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011.
Recipients of grants must execute a standard form of non-competition agreement. The Plan provides for the grant of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Options, and Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”). SARs may be awarded either separately, or in relation to options granted, and for the grant of bonus shares. Options granted are exercisable at a price not less than fair market value on the date of grant.
A summary of option activity for all plans for the six months ended March 31, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
|
Options
No. of shares
|
|
|
Weighted average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.62 |
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
$ |
65,500 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
9.60 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
$ |
80,600 |
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.50 |
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
$ |
69,700 |
|
Exercisable and expected to
vest at March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
$ |
80,600 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value included in the table above represents the difference between the exercise price of the options and the market price of the Company’s common stock for the options that had exercise prices that were lower than the $6.75 and $6.33 closing market price of the Company’s common stock at March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011 respectively.
A summary of restricted stock activity for the six months ended March 31, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
|
Number of shares of
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant – Date
Fair Value
|
|
Non-vested balance as of September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
125,200 |
|
|
$ |
5.69 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
|
$ |
7.10 |
|
Non-vested balance as of March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
144,200 |
|
|
$ |
5.22 |
|
In December 2011, the Company granted 110,000 shares of restricted stock to seven employees, which will vest in five equal annual installments so long as the employee is then employed by the Company or as determined by the Compensation Committee. The estimated fair value of the stock on the date of grant was $561,000 based on the fair market value of stock on the date of issue. Compensation expense is being charged to income on a straight line basis over five years. The charge to income for this employee restricted stock will be approximately $28,000 on a quarterly basis.
In January 2012, the Company granted 15,200 shares of restricted stock to eight non-employee directors, which will vest on the day before the 2013 annual meeting providing that the grantee remains a director of the Company, or as otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. The aggregate fair value of the stock measured on the date of grant was $80,000, based on the closing sale price of the stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is being charged to income on a straight line basis over the twelve month period during which the forfeiture conditions lapse. The charge to income for these restricted stock grants in the first six months of fiscal 2012 was $13,000 and the subsequent charge will be approximately $20,000 on a quarterly basis.
Stock based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2012 was $66,000 and $126,000, respectively and for the three and six month periods ended April 2, 2011 was $43,000 and $79,000, respectively. At March 31, 2012 there was $647,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to share options and restricted stock granted under the plan. The Company expects to recognize that cost over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.
(5) Cash dividends
The Company suspended the payment of dividends in order to conserve cash to meet the needs of the business during the recent global recession. The Board of Directors will consider whether to resume paying dividends as conditions and the Company’s operating results improve.
(6) Calculation of earnings per share and weighted average shares outstanding
Basic and fully diluted earnings per share were calculated as follows:
(in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic
|
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
3,296 |
|
Basic income per share
|
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
$ |
.23 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
Common stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted
|
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
3,356 |
|
|
|
3,332 |
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
|
$ |
.22 |
|
|
$ |
.15 |
|
No. of options that are anti-dilutive excluded from calculation of common stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10 |
|
(7) Segment information
The Company has two reportable segments: electronic controls and capacitors. The electronic controls segment produces microprocessor based control systems for zero emission and hybrid electric vehicles. The capacitors segment produces metalized film capacitors for sale to electronic equipment manufacturers. Each segment has its own management team and sales force and the capacitors segment has its own manufacturing facility.
The significant accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the 2011 10-K. Inter-segment revenues are accounted for at current market prices. The Company evaluates the performance of each segment principally based on operating income. The Company does not allocate income taxes, interest income and expense or foreign currency translation gains and losses to segments. Information concerning operations of these businesses is as follows:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
|
$ |
9,702 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
10,101 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
695 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
24,647 |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended April 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
|
$ |
7,154 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,787 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
658 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
|
20,142 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
21,472 |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
|
$ |
17,775 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
18,616 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
24,647 |
|
|
|
|
Six months ended April 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
|
$ |
13,540 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
14,670 |
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
691 |
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
|
20,142 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
21,472 |
|
In the electronic controls segment, the revenues were derived from the following products and services:
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Electronic controls for zero emission and hybrid electric vehicles
|
|
|
$ |
7,595 |
|
|
$ |
6,207 |
|
|
$ |
13,179 |
|
|
$ |
9,908 |
|
Accessory and aftermarket products and services
|
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
Total electronic controls segment revenues
|
|
|
$ |
9,702 |
|
|
$ |
7,154 |
|
|
$ |
17,775 |
|
|
$ |
13,540 |
|
(8) Research and development
The cost of research and development programs is charged against income as incurred and was as follows:
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Research and development expense, net of grants receivable
|
|
|
$ |
826 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
1,643 |
|
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
Percentage of sales
|
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
In fiscal 2010 the Company was awarded a research and development grant by the Technology Strategy Board, a public body established by the U.K. government in 2007 to stimulate technology-enabled innovation. The Company is one of a consortium of organizations participating in a project to research and design ultra-efficient systems for electric and hybrid vehicles. In the second quarter of 2012, the Company recorded grant income from this Technology Strategy Board project of $110,000 associated with research and development expense of $240,000. The grant income was recorded as a reduction of research and development expense. In the second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, the Company was awarded research and development grants by One North East, the Regional Development Agency responsible for the support of business in the North East of England, to accelerate the development of two new products. These two projects were completed in March 2011 as required by the grant awards. The Company recorded grant income of $217,000 and $383,000 in the first and second quarters of 2011, respectively, associated with research and development expense of $620,000 and $1,094,000 in the first and second quarters of 2011, respectively, on these two projects. The grant income was recorded as a reduction of research and development expense.
(9) Employee benefit plans
Sevcon has a defined benefit plan covering the majority of its U.K. employees and a frozen defined benefit pension plan in the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Sevcon USA, Inc. There is also a small defined contribution plan covering senior managers in the capacitor business and a defined contribution plan for employees in the U.S. controls business. The following table sets forth the components of the net pension cost for the defined benefit plans:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
Net cost of defined contribution plans
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Non current liabilities
|
|
|
$ |
7,760 |
|
|
$ |
7,272 |
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss net of tax benefit
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost net of tax benefit
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Actuarial gain net of tax benefit
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
806 |
|
Net cost of defined contribution plans
|
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
Sevcon, Inc. contributed $13,000 to its frozen U.S. pension plan in the six months ended March 31, 2012; it presently anticipates contributing a further $38,000 to fund this U.S. plan in the remainder of 2012. In addition, employer contributions to the U.K. defined benefit plan were $245,000 in the first six months and are estimated to total $498,000 in 2012.
The table below presents information about the Company’s pension plan assets measured and recorded at fair value as of March 31, 2012 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized by the Company to determine the fair values.
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1*
(Quoted prices in active markets)
|
|
|
Level 2**
(Significant observable inputs)
|
|
|
Level 3***
(Unobservable inputs)
|
|
Mutual Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Standard Life Pension Global Absolute Returns Strategies Fund
|
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Standard Life UK Indexed Linked Fund
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Standard Life Long Corporate Bond Fund
|
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
CF Ruffer Absolute Return Fund
|
|
|
|
6,220 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
U.S. Equity Funds
|
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
U.S. Fixed Income Funds
|
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other Types of Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
*
|
Level 1 investments represent mutual funds for which a quoted market price is available on an active market. These investments will primarily hold stocks or bonds, or a combination of stocks and bonds.
|
**
|
The Company currently does not have any Level 2 pension plan financial assets.
|
***
|
The Company currently does not have any Level 3 pension plan financial assets.
|
The following estimated benefit payments, which reflect future service, as appropriate have been or are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
(in thousands
of dollars)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
2013
|
|
|
|
371 |
|
2014
|
|
|
|
513 |
|
2015
|
|
|
|
658 |
|
2016
|
|
|
|
726 |
|
2017 – 2021 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
The following table sets forth the movement in the liability for pension benefits in the six months ended March 31, 2012:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
Liability for pension benefits at September 30, 2011
|
|
|
$ |
7,634 |
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
Plan contributions
|
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
Liability for pension benefits at March 31, 2012
|
|
|
$ |
7,760 |
|
(10) Inventories
Inventories were comprised of:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,653 |
|
|
$ |
7,478 |
|
(11) Fair Value Measurements
The fair value topic of FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The accounting guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
At March 31, 2012, the Company had no financial instruments that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, a bank loan payable, and a revolving credit facility payable.
The recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value based on their short-term nature. The carrying value of the Company’s bank loan payable and the revolving credit facility payable approximate their fair value due to their fixed and variable interest rates, respectively, which are Level 2 inputs.
(12) Accrued expenses
Set out below is an analysis of other accrued expenses at March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011, which shows separately any items in excess of 5% of total current liabilities:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
Warranty reserves
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,611 |
|
|
$ |
2,106 |
|
(13) Warranty reserves
The movement in warranty reserves was as follows:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
Six Months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2
2011
|
|
Warranty reserves at beginning of period
|
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
Decrease in beginning balance for warranty obligations settled during the period
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Other changes to pre-existing warranties
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net increase in warranty reserves for products sold during the period
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Warranty reserves at end of period
|
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
(14) Debt
At March 31, 2012 the Company had $135,000 (September 30, 2011, $152,000) outstanding under a U.K. bank loan entered into in April 2010, with a fixed interest rate of 6.8%. The loan, which was entered into by the U.K. metalized film capacitor subsidiary to purchase an item of capital equipment, is denominated in British Pounds. The loan agreement provides for equal monthly installments comprising interest and principal for a five year period which commenced in May 2010. Of the total amount outstanding at March 31, 2012, $40,000 is shown in the current liabilities section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under current portion of long-term debt, representing the principal element of the loan installments in the twelve months commencing March 31, 2012. Included in long term debt, at March 31, 2012, is $95,000 which represents the principal element of the loan installments for the years 2013 to 2015. The carrying value of the debt at March 31, 2012 approximated to fair value based on current interest rates.
On June 15, 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Sevcon USA, Inc., entered into a $3,500,000 secured revolving credit facility with RBS Citizens, National Association for working capital and general corporate purposes. The loan and security agreement will expire on June 14, 2014 when all outstanding principal and unpaid interest will be due and payable in full. The facility may be paid before maturity in whole or in part at the option of Sevcon USA, Inc., without penalty or premium. Interest on the loan is payable monthly, and in the first quarter of 2012, was calculated at a margin over LIBOR. Upon entering into the revolving credit facility, Sevcon USA, Inc. drew down $1,700,000, which was the total amount outstanding at March 31, 2012. This $1,700,000 is shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under long-term debt. The carrying value of the debt approximated to fair value based on current interest rates.
In March 2012, the Company’s U.K. bank renewed the overdraft facilities of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary operations. The Company’s U.K. subsidiaries have a multi-currency overdraft facility of $1,450,000 which is secured against real estate owned by the U.K. subsidiary companies. In common with bank overdrafts in Europe, the facility renewal is for a twelve month period although in line with normal practice in Europe, it can be withdrawn on demand by the bank. The facilities were unused at March 31, 2012.
Annual principal payments on long term debt at March 31, 2012 are as follows:
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
2012-13 |
$ |
40 |
|
2013-14 |
|
1,748 |
|
2014-15 |
|
43 |
|
2015-16 |
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
(15) Subsequent events
In preparing these interim consolidated financial statements, the Company has evaluated, for potential recognition or disclosure, events or transactions subsequent to the end of the most recent quarterly period and through the date these financial statements were available to be issued. No material subsequent events were identified that require recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this discussion and analysis about the Company’s anticipated financial results and growth, as well as those about the development of its products and markets, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These include the risks referred to and described under “Risk Factors” below and others discussed in this report.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
As of March 31, 2012, there have been no material changes to the critical accounting estimates described in the Company’s 2011 10-K. However, if the continuing worldwide economic uncertainty continues to have a negative effect on our business, estimates used in future periods may vary materially from those included in the Company’s previous disclosures.
For example:
(i)
|
if the financial condition of any of the Company's customers deteriorates as a result of further business declines, the Company may be required to increase its estimated allowance for bad debts;
|
(ii)
|
if actual future demand is less than previously projected, inventory write-downs may be required;
|
(iii)
|
significant negative industry or economic trends that adversely affect our future revenues and profits, or a reduction of our market capitalization relative to net book value, among other factors, may change the estimated future cash flows or other factors that we use to determine whether or not goodwill has been impaired and lead us to conclude that an impairment charge is required.
|
All of these factors, and others resulting from the current economic situation, may have a material adverseimpact on the Company’s results.
OVERVIEW OF SECOND QUARTER AND FIRST SIX MONTHS
Results of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011
The following table compares the results by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 with the same period in the prior year. The table shows the effect of currency and volume changes in percentage terms.
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Favorable (unfavorable)
% change due to:
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls - to external customers
|
|
|
$ |
9,702 |
|
|
$ |
7,154 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
Capacitors - to external customers
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Capacitors - inter-segment
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Capacitors – total
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Total sales to external customers
|
|
|
|
10,101 |
|
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Total
|
|
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
Selling, research and administrative expenses and gain on sale of fixed assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Capacitors
|
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Unallocated corporate expense
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Total
|
|
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Capacitors
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
Unallocated corporate expense
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other income and expense
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Sales in the second quarter of 2012 were $10,101,000, an increase of $2,314,000 or 30% compared to $7,787,000 reported in the same quarter last year. This increase was due to higher shipment volumes of the Company’s Gen4 controller to both new and traditional markets, partially offset by lower shipments from the capacitor business. Volumes were $2,548,000 or 36% higher in the controls business segment but were $234,000 lower in the capacitor segment. Foreign currency fluctuations decreased reported sales in the second fiscal quarter by $205,000, or 3%, mainly due to a weaker U.S. Dollar compared to both the British Pound and the Euro than in the prior year period.
In the controls business segment, demand for the Company’s products grew globally. Volumes shipped were higher by 52% in the Far East, 40% in Europe and 19% in North America compared to the same period last year. Increased sales volume was mainly due to further customer gains and the start of production in a range of on-road and off-road EV applications; sales in this sector increased by 146%. Customer demand grew by 17% overall in the Company’s traditional markets of industrial applications for construction, distribution, mining, airport ground support and utility applications. In the capacitor business, volumes shipped were 36% lower than last year due to lower demand from customers in the industrial sector.
Gross profit was 35% higher compared to the same fiscal period last year. Gross profit of $3,622,000 was 35.9% of sales in the second quarter compared to $2,688,000 or 34.5% of sales in the same quarter last year. Foreign currency fluctuations decreased the reported gross profit by $32,000, or 1.2%, compared to the same period last year.
Selling, research and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2012 were $2,927,000, an increase of $446,000 or 18%, compared to $2,481,000 reported in the same period last year. In the second quarter of 2012 the company recorded grant income of $110,000 from on-going project work sponsored by the Technology Strategy Board, a U.K. government body. Prior to the grant income, operating expenses were $3,037,000.
In the second quarter of 2011, selling, research and administrative expenses were partially offset by grant income of $383,000 from One North East, a U.K. government regional development organization. Prior to the grant, income, selling, research and administrative expenses in 2011 were $2,864,000 on a comparable basis. The increase in expenses after adjusting for government grant income in each period was $173,000. The increase of $173,000 was due to one-time employment costs and the salary costs of additional staff which were added later in the 2011 fiscal year. Foreign currency fluctuations decreased operating expense by $48,000 or 1.9%, compared with the same quarter last year.
Operating income in the second quarter of 2012 was $695,000, which includes grant income of $110,000. Operating income in the same period last year was $658,000 which included a one-time gain of $451,000 from the disposal of a surplus building in the U.K. and grant income of $383,000. Before these adjustments the Company recorded an operating loss in 2011 of $176,000. The $761,000 improvement in operating income after adjusting for the one-time gain on the property sale in 2011 and also adjusting for grant income in each period was due to higher shipment volumes partially offset by higher operating costs.
The Company recorded income before income taxes of $628,000 in the second quarter of 2012 compared to income before income taxes of $585,000 in the same period last year.
The Company recorded an effective tax rate of 25.1% and 13.7% of pre-tax income in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in effective income tax rates from 2011 to 2012 was due to a number of factors, the most significant of which being that the gain on the sale of the surplus U.K. property recognized in the second quarter of 2011was not subject to tax. In addition, in 2011, the Company recorded a $176,000 provision to reduce the balance sheet value of certain U.K. deferred tax assets due to a change in the U.K. Corporation tax rate from 28% to 26%, effective April 1, 2011. The Company also re-evaluated the realizability of its deferred tax assets in the second quarter of 2011 as a result of economic conditions, the Company's operating results, and the Company's revised estimate of pre-tax income in the near-term. Based on the review, the Company reversed, in the second quarter of 2011, $207,000 of a $379,000 deferred tax valuation allowance recognized in 2009. This valuation allowance related primarily to deferred tax assets in the U.S. The total income tax provision for the second quarter of 2011 was $80,000.
There was net income for the quarter of $470,000 or $.14 per diluted share compared to net income of $505,000 or $.15 per diluted share in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Six months ended March 31, 2012 and April 2, 2011
The following table compares first half year results by segment for the six months ended March 31 2012 with the same period in the prior year. The table shows the effect of currency and volume changes in percentage terms.
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
Favorable (unfavorable)
% change due to:
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
April 2,
2011
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls - to external customers
|
|
|
$ |
17,775 |
|
|
$ |
13,540 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
Capacitors - to external customers
|
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Capacitors - inter-segment
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Capacitors - total
|
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Total sales to external customers
|
|
|
|
18,616 |
|
|
|
14,670 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Total
|
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Selling, research and administrative expenses and gain on sale of fixed assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
|
(5,276 |
) |
|
|
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Unallocated corporate expense
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Total
|
|
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
(4,365 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controls
|
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
Capacitors
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Unallocated corporate expense
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
Other income and expense
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Sales in the six months ended March 31, 2012 were $18,616,000, an increase of $3,946,000, or 27%, compared to the same period last year when sales were $14,670,000. The increase in sales was due to increased volumes shipped, which were $4,166,000, or 28.4%, higher than in the same period last year. Foreign currency fluctuations accounted for a reduction in reported sales of $220,000, or 1.5%, mainly due to a stronger Euro compared to the US Dollar from the same period in 2011.
In the controls business segment, volumes shipped were higher in all geographic regions in which the Company operates, Europe, North America and the Far East were 54%, 12% and 34% higher respectively compared to the same period last year. The increase in sales volume is due to the release of new products and continued customer gains in a range of on-road and off-road EV applications coupled with the start of production at new customers. The Company’s traditional markets for industrial vehicles like fork lift trucks, aerial work platforms and mining equipment continued recovery in the half year. Following significant reductions during the 2009 recession these markets have improved but are still lower than pre-recession levels. Sales to these sectors increased by 18% compared to the same period in fiscal 2011. Volumes shipped in the capacitor business were 25% lower in the first half year, largely due to lower demand from the railway signaling sector. The railway signaling sector in the capacitor business is mainly driven by infrastructure project demand.
Gross profit of $6,604,000 was 35.5% of sales in this period compared to $5,056,000 or 34.5% in the comparable period in fiscal 2011. Foreign currency fluctuations reduced reported gross profit by $58,000 compared with the prior year period; excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, gross profit increased by $1,606,000, or 31.8%, compared to the first half of last year due to the increase in volumes shipped in the period. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, in the controller business, gross profit increased by $1,868,000, or 41.5%, compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011 due to increased volumes shipped; in the capacitor business, gross profit decreased by $262,000, or 47.5%, due to lower demand in the first half year compared to the prior year due to lower demand from the railway signaling sector.
Selling, research and administrative expenses were $5,657,000, an increase of $841,000, or 17.5% from the $4,816,000 in the same period last year. In the second quarter of fiscal 2012 the Company recorded grant income of $110,000 from a U.K. government sponsored development program for a new integrated electric drivetrain. Excluding grant income, expenses were $5,767,000 in the first half of fiscal 2012. In the first six months of 2011 the Company recorded U.K. government grant income of $600,000 which partially offset selling, research and administrative expenses. Excluding grant income, selling, research and administrative expenses were $5,416,000 in the first half of fiscal 2011. The increase of $351,000 in fiscal 2012 was due to higher staffing costs associated with business growth and our investment in new product development resources.
Operating income in the first half of fiscal 2012 was $947,000 including $110,000 of grant income, compared with $691,000 last year, which included $600,000 of grant income and a $451,000 gain from the sale of the surplus property in the U.K. Prior to these adjustments there was an operating loss of $360,000 in the same period in 2011. The increase in operating profit of $1,197,000 on a comparable basis was due to higher shipment volumes partially offset by higher expenses in growing and supporting new business.
In the first half of fiscal 2012 there was a foreign currency gain of $121,000 compared to a loss of $71,000 in the same period last year, mainly due to a stronger U.S. Dollar compared to the Euro in the prior year period.
In the first half of fiscal 2012 the Company recorded an effective income tax rate of 24.7% of pre-tax income. This relatively low rate being largely due to the availability of research and development income tax credits in the Company’s two U.K. subsidiaries which reduced the income tax rate to 12.2% on the combined results of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary operations.
In the first half of fiscal 2011 the Company recorded an effective income tax rate of 13.7% of pre-tax income; this low effective rate was largely due to there being no income tax payable in respect of the gain on the sale of the U.K. property recognized in the second quarter of 2011. In addition, in 2011, the Company recorded a $176,000 provision to reduce the balance sheet value of U.K. deferred tax asset due to a change in the U.K. Corporation tax rate from 28% to 26%, effective April 1, 2011. The Company also re-evaluated the realizability of its deferred tax assets in the second quarter of 2011as a result of economic conditions, the Company's operating results, and the Company's revised estimate of pre-tax income in the near-term. Based on the review, the Company reversed, in the second quarter of 2011, $207,000 of a $379,000 deferred tax valuation allowance recognized in 2009. This valuation allowance related primarily to deferred tax assets in the U.S. The total income taxes provision for the first six months of 2011 was $81,000.
In March 2012 the U.K. government announced a reduction in the U.K. Corporation tax rate from 25% to 24% effective April 1, 2012 and a further reduction to 23% effective April 1, 2013. It is anticipated that both tax rate reductions will be substantively enacted in U.K. law in July 2012. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of the change in the tax rates will be recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. It is estimated that the charge to income to write down the value of the U.K. deferred tax asset will be approximately $160,000 when the rate changes are enacted.
The Company recorded net income of for the first half of fiscal 2012 of $754,000 or $.22 per diluted share compared to net income of $510,000 and $.15 per diluted share in the same period in fiscal 2011.
Financial Condition
While the Company has paid regular quarterly dividends in the past, due to the continuing uncertain economic outlook, the Board of Directors continues to suspend the payment of dividends and will consider whether to resume paying dividends on a quarter by quarter basis.
Cash balances at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2012 were $1,284,000, compared to $1,797,000 on September 30, 2011, a decrease in cash of $513,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
In the first six months of fiscal 2012, there was a net income of $754,000 and operating activities used $294,000 of cash. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, receivables increased by $1,940,000 and inventories increased $38,000 both of which reduced cash during the period. Payables increased by $1,008,000 and accrued expenses decreased by $516,000, during the period. The number of days sales in receivables increased in the first six months of 2012 by one day from 62 days at September 30, 2011 to 63 days at March 31, 2012. Capital expenditures in the first six months were $272,000. Exchange rate changes increased reported cash by $71,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
The Company had a U.K. bank loan of $135,000, of which $40,000 was short-term and $95,000 long-term debt at March 31, 2012. It has overdraft facilities in the United Kingdom amounting to $1,450,000 which were unused as of March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011. The overdraft facility of the U.K. capacitor subsidiary is secured by a legal charge over the facility owned and occupied by that company. The overdraft facility of the U.K. controls subsidiary is secured by a legal charge over a facility owned by that company. Both facilities were renewed in 2012 for a period of twelve months but, in line with normal practice in Europe, can be withdrawn on demand by the bank. Management believes that, if these facilities were withdrawn, adequate alternative credit resources would be available. However, this would depend on the Company’s situation and the economic environment at the time. Accordingly, management does not rely on their availability in projecting the adequacy of the Company’s capital resources.
In June 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Sevcon USA, Inc., entered into a $3,500,000 secured revolving credit facility with RBS Citizens, National Association for working capital and general corporate purposes. The obligations under the revolving credit facility are guaranteed by the Company and are secured by all of the assets of Sevcon USA, Inc. and a pledge of all of the capital stock of Sevcon USA, Inc. The facility imposes customary limitations on Sevcon USA, Inc.’s ability to, among other things, pay dividends, make distributions, and incur additional indebtedness. Under the facility, Sevcon USA, Inc. must maintain, on a quarterly basis, a debt to tangible net worth ratio of no more than 2:1 and a debt service coverage ratio of no less than 1.25:1 for each rolling twelve-month period. At March 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with these covenants. Upon entering into the revolving credit facility, Sevcon USA, Inc. drew down $1,700,000, which was the total amount outstanding at March 31, 2012. The revolving credit facility will expire on June 14, 2014 when all outstanding principal and unpaid interest will be due and payable in full.
There were no significant capital expenditure commitments at March 31, 2012. It is estimated that the Company will make contributions to its U.K. and U.S. defined benefit pension plans of approximately $549,000 in fiscal 2012; should the Company suffer a material reduction in revenues in 2012 this commitment could adversely impact the Company’s financial position. In the opinion of management, the Company’s requirements for working capital to meet projected operational and capital spending in both the short and long term can be met by a combination of existing cash resources, future earnings and existing borrowing facilities in Europe. However, the outlook continues to remain uncertain, given the continuing worldwide economic situation and in particular the low economic growth in Europe and North America. Any material reduction in revenues will have a materially adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, which would be exacerbated if any of the Company’s lenders withdraws or reduces available credit. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash from operations and if the bank overdraft facilities are withdrawn, the Company would need to raise additional debt or equity capital from other sources to avoid significantly curtailing its business and materially adversely affecting its results.
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Foreign currency risk
The Company sells to customers throughout the industrialized world. The majority of the Company’s products are manufactured in, or sourced from, the United Kingdom. In the first six months of 2012, approximately 50% of the Company’s sales were made in U.S. Dollars, 17% were made in British Pounds and 33% were made in Euros. Approximately 80% of the Company’s cost of sales was incurred in British Pounds and Euros. This resulted in the Company’s sales and margins being exposed to fluctuations due to the change in the exchange rates of the U.S. Dollar, the British Pound and the Euro. The Company has trade accounts receivable and accounts payable denominated in both British Pounds and Euros that are exposed to exchange fluctuations.
In addition, the translation of the sales and income of foreign subsidiaries into U.S. Dollars is also subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
The following table provides information about the Company’s foreign currency accounts receivable, accounts payable and firmly committed sales contracts outstanding as of March 31, 2012. The information is provided in U.S. Dollar amounts, as presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The table presents the amounts at which the Company’s foreign currency accounts receivable, accounts payable and firmly committed sales contracts as of March 31, 2012 are expected to mature based on the exchange rate of the relevant foreign currency to U.S. Dollars at March 31, 2012:
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity or
transaction date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
On balance sheet financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In $ U.S. Functional Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable in British Pounds
|
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
988 |
|
Accounts receivable in Euros
|
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Accounts payable in British Pounds
|
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
521 |
|
Accounts payable in Euros
|
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
Anticipated Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In $ U.S. Functional Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firmly committed sales contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In British Pounds
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
In Euros
|
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,056 |
|
Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s policy is to invest surplus funds in instruments with maturities of less than 12 months at both fixed and floating interest rates. This investment portfolio is generally subject to general credit, liquidity, counterparty, market and interest rate risks that may be exacerbated by the current global economic instability. If the banking system or the fixed income or credit markets deteriorate further or remain volatile, the values and liquidity of these investments could be adversely affected. The Company did not have any surplus funds invested as of March 31, 2012.
At March 31, 2012, the Company had $135,000 of interest bearing debt related to a bank loan for the purchase of capital equipment by the Company’s U.K. metalized film capacitor business. The Company invests surplus funds in instruments with maturities of less than 12 months at both fixed and floating interest rates. The Company incurs short-term borrowings from time-to-time on its overdraft facilities in Europe at variable interest rates.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(e)), have concluded that, as of March 31, 2012, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have identified no change in the Company’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
In addition to the market risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our 2011 10-K and the considerations set out in Part I, Items 2 and 3 above, the Company believes that the following represent the most significant risk factors for the Company:
Capital markets are cyclical and weakness in the United States and international economies may harm our business.
The Company’s traditional customers are mainly manufacturers of capital goods such as fork lift trucks, aerial lifts and railway signaling equipment. These markets are cyclical and depend heavily on worldwide transportation, shipping and other economic activity. They experienced a significant decline in demand during the recent global recession. Further, as our business has expanded globally, we have become increasingly subject to the risks arising from adverse changes in global economic conditions. While market conditions appear to be improving, economic instability remains. As a result, current or potential customers may be unable to fund purchases or manufacturing of products, which could cause them to delay, decrease or cancel purchases of our products or not to pay the Company or to delay paying for previously purchased products. In addition, the effect of the crisis on the Company’s banks and other banks may cause the Company to lose its current overdraft facilities and be unable otherwise to obtain financing for operations as needed.
Demand for on-road electric vehicles incorporating our products may not materialize.
The Company has become increasingly involved in developing products for the on-road electric vehicle market. We have relationships with several customers that incorporate our products into their EV products. Our competitors and others are also developing products for other entrants in the EV market, with similar and competing technologies. If our customers’ products or technology are not successful commercially, or if worldwide demand for EVs fails to grow as much as we hope, we may not realize the anticipated demand for our products in the EV market, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The Company relies on a small number of key customers for a substantial portion of its revenues.
Ten customers accounted for 49% of the Company’s revenues in the first six months of 2012 and the largest customer accounted for 10% of revenues. Although we have had business relationships with most of these customers for many years, there are no long-term contractual supply agreements in place. Accordingly our performance could be adversely affected by the loss of one or more of these key customers.
The Company has substantial sales and operations outside the United States that could be adversely affected by changes in international markets.
A significant portion of our operations is located, and a significant portion of our business comes from, outside the United States. Accordingly, our performance could be adversely affected by economic downturns in Europe or the Far East as well as in the United States. A consequence of significant international business is that a large percentage of our revenues and expenses are denominated in foreign currencies that fluctuate in value versus the U.S. Dollar. Significant fluctuations in foreign exchange rates can and do have a material impact on our financial results, which are reported in U.S. Dollars. Other risks associated with international business include: changing regulatory practices and tariffs; staffing and managing international operations, including complying with local employment laws; longer collection cycles in certain areas; and changes in tax and other laws.
The continuing debt crisis in the Eurozone may have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results, which could adversely affect our stock price.
There continues to be significant uncertainty about the stability of global credit and financial markets in light of the continuing debt crisis in certain European countries. A default or a withdrawal from the Eurozone by any of the countries involved, or the uncertainty alone, could cause the value of the Euro to deteriorate. This, or a change to a local currency, would reduce the purchasing power of affected European customers. We are unable to predict the likelihood of any of these events but, if any occurs, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Single source materials and sub-contractors may not meet the Company’s needs.
The Company relies on single, or a small number of, suppliers and sub-contractors for its requirements for most components, sub-assemblies and finished products. In the event that such suppliers and sub-contractors are unable or unwilling to continue supplying the Company, or to meet the Company’s cost and quality targets or needs for timely delivery, there is no certainty that the Company would be able to establish alternative sources of supply in time to meet customer demand.
Damage to the Company’s or sub-contractors’ buildings would hurt results.
In the electronic controls segment, the majority of the Company’s finished product is produced in three separate plants in Poland, Mexico and China; these plants are owned by sub-contractors. The capacitor business is located in a single plant in Wales. In the event that any of these plants was to be damaged or destroyed, there is no certainty that the Company would be able to establish alternative facilities in time to meet customer demand. The Company does carry property damage and business interruption insurance but this may not cover certain lost business due to the long-term nature of the relationships with many customers.
Failure to comply with financial covenants in our loan agreement could adversely affect us.
As of March 31, 2012, the Company’s subsidiary in the United States, Sevcon USA, Inc. had approximately $1,700,000 of outstanding indebtedness under a revolving credit facility with RBS Citizens, National Association. This indebtedness is secured by all of Sevcon USA, Inc.’s assets and a pledge of all the capital stock of Sevcon USA, Inc. The loan agreement includes financial covenants which require us to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios during the term of the agreement. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition”. Failure to comply with the financial covenants would be an event of default under the loan agreement that would give the lender the right to cease making additional advances, accelerate repayment of all sums due and take action to collect the monies owed to it, including foreclosing on its security interest, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.
Product liability claims may have a material adverse effect.
The Company’s products are technically complex and are installed and used by third parties. Defects in their design, installation, use or manufacturing may result in product liability claims against the Company. Such claims may result in significant damage awards, and the cost of any such litigation could be material.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3 Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
None.
See Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
SEVCON, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2012
|
By: /s/ Paul N. Farquhar
|
|
|
|
Paul N. Farquhar
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
Description
|
|
|
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2011).
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2011).
|
|
|
10.1
|
Sevcon, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (filed herewith).
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
32.1
101
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
The following materials formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These materials are furnished and not “filed” herewith.
|