UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10–Q

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

 

Commission File Number 1-4422

 

ROLLINS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

2170 Piedmont Road, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

30324

(Zip Code)

 

(404) 888-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

________________________________

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

 

 

Rollins, Inc. had 100,868,919 shares of its $1 par value Common Stock outstanding as of July 15, 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

 

 

 

 

 

Basis of Preparation - The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Rollins, Inc. (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reporting on Form 10-Q. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 94, “Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries” (“SFAS 94”) and Rule 3A-02(a) of Regulation S-X. In accordance with SFAS 94 and Rule 3A-02(a) of Regulation S-X, the Company’s policy is to consolidate all subsidiaries and investees where it has voting control. The Company does not have any subsidiaries or investees where it has less than a 100% equity interest or less than 100% voting control, nor does it have any interest in other investees, joint ventures, or other variable interest entities that require consolidation under FASB interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46R).

 

Footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the results of its operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008.

 

The Company has only one reportable segment, its pest and termite control business. The Company’s results of operations and its financial condition are not reliant upon any single customer or a few customers or the Company’s foreign operations.

 

A group that includes the Company’s Chairman of the Board, R. Randall Rollins, and his brother, Gary W. Rollins, who is also a director of the Company, and certain companies under their control, controls in excess of 50% of the Company’s voting power.

 

Estimates Used in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements—The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying notes and financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all investments with an original or purchased maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments, all of which are cash equivalents, are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the Company classifies intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization; (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization; and (3) goodwill. The Company does not amortize intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired. Such conditions may include an economic downturn or a change in the assessment of future operations. The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill at the company level. Such impairment tests for goodwill include comparing the fair value of the appropriate reporting unit (the Company) with its carrying value. The Company performs impairment tests for indefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset unit to its carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment charge if the asset’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company completed its most recent annual impairment analyses as of September 30, 2007. Based upon the results of these analyses, the Company has concluded that no impairment of its goodwill or other intangible assets was indicated.

 

 

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - In accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the Company’s long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets with definite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Based upon the results of these analyses, the Company has concluded that no impairment of its long-lived assets was indicated.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)—Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) results from foreign currency translations and changes in the pension liability.

Franchising Program – Orkin had 62 franchises as of June 30, 2008, including international franchises in Mexico, established in 2000, Panama, established in 2003, and Costa Rica, established in 2006, along with Honduras, the United Arab Emirates, the Dominican Republic and South Korea all of which were established in 2007 and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the Kingdom of Bahrain were established in 2008. Transactions with franchises involve sales of customer contracts to establish new franchises, initial franchise fees and royalties. The customer contracts and initial franchise fees are typically sold for a combination of cash and notes due over periods ranging up to 5 years.

 

 

 

The Company recognizes gains from the sale of customer contracts at the time they are sold to franchises and collection on the notes is reasonably assured.

The Company recognized a net gain for the sale of customer contracts for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and a loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 due to customer adjustments. These amounts are included as revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

 

 

Initial franchise fees are deferred for the duration of the initial contract period and are included as unearned revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Royalties from franchises are accrued and recognized as revenues as earned on a monthly basis.

 

 

 

 

The Company’s maximum exposure to loss relating to the franchises (notes receivable less deferred franchise fees) aggregated $2.1 million and $1.9 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, trade and notes receivables, accounts payable and other short-term liabilities. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate their fair values.

 

Seasonality— The business of the Company is affected by the seasonal nature of the Company’s pest and termite control services. The increase in pest pressure and activity, as well as the metamorphosis of termites in the spring and summer (the occurrence of which is determined by the timing of the change in seasons), has historically resulted in an increase in the revenue of the Company’s pest and termite control operations during such periods as evidenced by the following chart.

 

 

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

Statements of Financial Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. For financial assets and liabilities, this statement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007 and does not require any new fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 was issued which delayed the effective date of FASB Statement No. 157 to fiscal years ending after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company did not elect the fair value

 

 

 

option for any of its existing financial instruments as of June 30, 2008 and the Company has not determined whether or not it will elect this option for financial instruments it may acquire in the future.

Emerging Issues Task Force

In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued Issue 06-11 “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards”. The guidance in EITF Issue 06-11 addresses how an employer should account for the income tax benefits related to dividend or dividend equivalent payments made to employees holding certain share-based payment awards. Entities are required to recognize tax benefits realized from dividend or dividend equivalents paid to employees for certain share-based payment awards as an increase to additional paid-in capital and include such amounts in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. The Company is subject to the provisions of EITF Issue 06-11 as of January 1, 2008. The effect on the consolidated results of operations, cash flow and financial position is immaterial.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

Statements of Financial Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be identified in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. The Company will apply the provisions of this statement prospectively, as required, beginning on January 1, 2009 and does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. In general, the statement 1) broadens the guidance of SFAS No. 141, extending its applicability to all events where one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, 2) broadens the use of fair value measurements used to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, 3) changes the accounting for acquisition related fees and restructuring costs incurred in connection with an acquisition, and 4) increases required disclosures. The Company will apply the provisions of this statement prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009 and is currently assessing the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: 1) How and why an entity uses derivative instruments; 2) How derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and 3) How derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 161 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, “Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, which simply moves the requirements related to which authoritative literature to look to first from the audit standards to GAAP.  SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the PCAOB’s amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.   The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts”, which clarifies how FASB Statement No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises”, applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts issued by insurance enterprises.    The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, including interim periods in that year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 163 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Staff Interpretations

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, which amends the factors that must be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life over which to amortize the cost of a recognized intangible asset

 

 

 

under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The FSP requires an entity to consider its own assumptions about renewal or extension of the term of the arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset, and is an attempt to improve consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and the guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Acquisition of HomeTeam Pest Defense:

On April 3, 2008, The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Centex Home Services, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, HomeTeam Pest Defense, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and HomeTeam Pest Defense, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, related to the business of providing termite and pest control services to homebuilders, businesses and homeowners.  Subject to post-closing adjustments, the purchase price paid for the acquisition was approximately $137.7 million. The purchase price was negotiated at arms length.

HomeTeam Pest Defense has a customer base of approximately 400,000 customers, which are served from 50 service locations in 13 states. HomeTeam Pest Defense recorded revenues of approximately $134 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. This acquisition will broaden Rollins’ market share considerably. The Company's consolidated statements of income include the results of operations of HomeTeam Pest Defense for the period beginning April 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008.

The Company engaged an independent valuation firm to determine the allocation of the purchase price to Goodwill and identifiable Intangible assets. Such valuation resulted in the allocation of $56.4 million to Goodwill and $89.7 million to other intangible assets, principally customer contracts. The Company is in the process of analyzing the estimated values of assets and liabilities acquired and are evaluating third-party valuations of certain tangible and intangible assets and finalizing its operating plans and, thus, the allocation of the purchase price is subject to material revision in its future financial statements. The finite-lived intangible assets, principally customer contracts, are being amortized over periods principally ranging from 8 to 20 years on a straight-lined basis.

 

 

 

The fair values of HomeTeam’s assets and liabilities, at the date of acquisition, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The pro forma financial information presented below gives effect to the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition as if it had occurred as of the beginning of our fiscal year 2007. The information presented below is for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of results that would have been achieved if the acquisition actually had occurred as of the beginning of such years or results which may be achieved in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 4. DEBT                                                                                                                                                                

 

On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement with SunTrust Bank and Bank of America, N.A. for an unsecured line of credit of up to $175 million, which includes a $75 million letter of credit subfacility, and a $10 million swingline subfacility. As of June 30, 2008, borrowings of $50.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit and $4.0 million under the swingline subfacility. The Company maintains approximately $35.7 million in letters of credit, which reduces its borrowing capacity under the credit facility. These letters of credit are required by the Company’s fronting insurance companies and/or certain states, due to the Company’s self-insured status, to secure various workers’ compensation and casualty insurance contracts, although the Company believes that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate such claims. The Revolving Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of Rollins’ domestic subsidiaries. The maturity date of all revolving loans under the Credit Agreement is March 27, 2013. Revolving loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at one of the following two rates, at the Company’s election:

 

 

 

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, without limitation, certain financial covenants including covenants restricting the Company’s ability to incur certain indebtedness or liens, or to merge or consolidate with or sell substantially all of its assets to another entity. Further, the Revolving Credit Agreement contains financial covenants restricting the Company’s ability to permit the ratio of the Company’s consolidated debt to EBITDA to exceed 2.5 to 1. The Company used $90.0 million of the available line of credit to fund the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition and to date has repaid $36.0 million of the loan.

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share (“EPS”), the Company presents basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed on the basis of weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of weighted-average shares outstanding plus common stock options outstanding during the period, which, if exercised, would have a dilutive effect on EPS. Prior period basic and diluted EPS has been restated for the stock split effective December 10, 2007. A reconciliation of the number of weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted EPS is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

During the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 262,775 shares of its common stock in the open market at a weighted-average of $15.85 per share with a total of 498,775 shares repurchased year to date at a weighted-average of $16.44 per share. In total, 515,491 additional shares may be purchased under its share repurchase program. Rollins, Inc. has had a buyback program in place for a number of years and has routinely purchased shares when it felt the opportunity was desirable. The Board authorized the purchase of 4.0 million additional shares of the Company’s common stock at its quarterly meeting on April 26, 2005. This authorization enables the Company to continue the purchase of Rollins, Inc. common stock when appropriate, which is an important benefit, resulting from the Company’s strong cash flows. The stock buy-back program has no expiration date.

 

The Company adopted SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” and FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” in the first quarter of 2008 for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about items measured at fair value. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. It applies to accounting pronouncements that already require or permit fair value measures. As a result, the Company will not be required to recognize any new assets or liabilities at fair value. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis.

SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three broad levels as follows:

 

Notes Receivable from Franchises:

Transactions with franchises involve sales of customer contracts to establish new franchises in the United States and initial franchise fees and royalties in both the United States and International Franchises. The customer contracts and initial franchise fees are typically sold for a combination of cash and notes due over periods ranging up to 5 years.

 

Outstanding Loans:

The Company has a Revolving Credit Agreement with SunTrust Bank and Bank of America, N.A. for an unsecured line of credit of up to $175 million, which includes a $75 million letter of credit subfacility, and a $10 million swingline subfacility. As of June 30, 2008, borrowings of $50.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit and $4.0 million under the swingline subfacility.

The following table summarizes the valuation of financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Company’s balance sheet as of June 30, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company measures the fair value of its notes receivable from franchises based on the Company’s historical experiences collecting from franchisees and current terms offered for similar notes.

 

Orkin, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, is a named defendant in Mark and Christine Butland et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., et al. pending in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida. The plaintiffs filed suit in March of 1999 and are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Court ruled in early April 2002, certifying the class action lawsuit against Orkin. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which remanded the case back to the trial court for further findings. In December 2004 the Court issued a new ruling certifying the class action. Orkin appealed this new ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals. In June 2006, the Florida Second District Court of Appeals issued a ruling denying certification of the class.  Following the Plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing, the court upheld its prior decision that class certification was improper but also ruled that the Plaintiffs can return to the trial court and attempt to certify a narrower class. Orkin will vigorously oppose any effort by the Plaintiffs to do so. Orkin believes this case to be without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously through trial, if necessary. At this time, the final outcome of the litigation cannot be determined. The Company does not believe that any pending claim, proceeding or litigation, either alone or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position; however, it is possible that an unfavorable outcome of some or all of the matters, however unlikely, could result in a charge that might be material to the results of an individual quarter.

Additionally, in the normal course of business, Orkin is a defendant in a number of lawsuits or arbitrations, which allege that plaintiffs have been damaged as a result of the rendering of services by Orkin. Orkin is actively contesting these actions. Some lawsuits have been filed (John Maciel v. Orkin, Inc., et al.; Ronald and Ileana Krzyzanowsky et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.; Adam Stauber v. Rollins, Inc. et al.; and Roy Sheppard et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.) in which the plaintiffs are seeking certification of a class. The cases originate in California and Arkansas, respectively. The Maciel lawsuit, a wage and hour related matter, was filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California and has not been scheduled for a class certification hearing. The Krzyzanowsky lawsuit, a termite service related matter, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and has not been scheduled for a class certification hearing. The Stauber lawsuit, a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act related matter, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and a date has not been scheduled for a hearing on class certification. The Sheppard lawsuit, a termite related matter, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas and a date has not been scheduled for a hearing on class certification. The Company believes these matters to be without merit and intends to vigorously contest certification and defend itself through trial or arbitration, if necessary. The Company does not believe that any pending claim, proceeding or litigation, either alone or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position; however, it is possible that an unfavorable outcome of some or all of the matters, however unlikely, could result in a charge that might be material to the results of an individual quarter.

Orkin is involved in certain environmental matters primarily arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company’s liability under any of these matters would not materially affect its financial condition or results of operations.  Consistent with the Company’s responsibilities under these regulations, the Company undertakes environmental assessments and remediation of hazardous substances from time to time as the Company determines its responsibilities for these purposes.  As these situations arise, the Company accrues management’s best estimate of future costs for these activities.  Based on management’s current estimates of these costs, management does not believe these costs are material to the Company’s financial condition or operating results or liquidity.

 

 

 

 

During the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 262,775 shares of its $1 par value common stock at a weighted average price of $15.85 per share with a total of 498,775 shares repurchased during the six months ended June 30, 2008 at a weighted average of $16.44 per share. In addition, during the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, approximately 55,000 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees; in total for the six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately 193,000 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees.

Stock options, time lapse restricted shares (TLRS’s) and restricted stock units have been issued to officers and other management employees under the Company’s Employee Stock Incentive Plans.  The stock options generally vest over a five-year period and expire ten years from the issuance date. 

TLRS’s provide for the issuance of a share of the Company’s Common Stock at no cost to the holder and generally vest after a certain stipulated number of years from the grant date, depending on the terms of the issue. TLRS’s vest in 20 percent increments starting with the second anniversary of the grant, over six years from the date of grant.  During these years, grantees receive all dividends declared and retain voting rights for the granted shares.  The agreements under which the restricted stock is issued provide that shares awarded may not be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions established under the plans have lapsed. The Company also issues restricted stock units to non-U.S. residents. These awards are similar to TLRS’s except that the recipient does not receive voting rights or dividends on the unvested units.

The Company issues new shares from its authorized but unissued share pool. At June 30, 2008, approximately 4.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock were reserved for issuance.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), which requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for all equity awards granted including stock options and TLRS’s based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. SFAS 123R supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). The Company has adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application method of adoption which requires the Company to record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2005 by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the remaining service periods of those awards with no change in historical reported earnings. Awards granted after December 31, 2005 are valued at fair value in accordance with provisions of SFAS 123R and recognized on a straight line basis over the service periods of each award. The Company estimated forfeiture rates for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 based on its historical experience.

 

In order to estimate the fair value of stock options, the Company used the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of publicly traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions and these assumptions can vary over time.

 

The only options outstanding at June 30, 2008 for SFAS 123R purposes are the options granted during the first quarter of 2003. The Company did not grant any stock options in any years following the 2003 grant; therefore no Black-Scholes calculation was necessary.

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s stock-based compensation programs recorded as expense ($ in thousands):

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2008, $20.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to time-lapse restricted shares is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 5.6 years for TLRS’s.

Options activity outstanding under the Company’s stock option plan as of June 30, 2008 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2008, were as follows:

 

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the second quarter of 2008 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2008. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the periods ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 was $2.3 million and $12.3 million, respectively. Exercise of options through the second quarters of 2008 and 2007 resulted in cash receipts of $0.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $60,000 in the quarter

 

 

 

ended June 30, 2008 and approximately $65,000 for the year related to the exercise of employee stock options, which has been recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

The following table summarizes information on unvested restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2008:

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” the Company maintains an accrual for termite claims representing the estimated costs of reapplications, repairs and associated labor and chemicals, settlements, awards and other costs relative to termite control services. Factors that may impact future cost include termiticide life expectancy and government regulation.

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the accrual for termite contracts is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following represents the net periodic pension benefit costs and related components in accordance with SFAS 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”:

 

 

 

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company did not make a contribution to its defined benefit plan. The Company is currently evaluating the defined benefit plan and has not determined if there will be a payment during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.

 

The Company determines its periodic income tax expense based upon the current period income and the annual estimated tax rate for the Company, adjusted for any change to prior year estimates. The estimated tax rate is revised, if necessary, as of the end of each successive interim period during the fiscal year to the Company’s current annual estimated tax rate.

 

 

 

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF

 

Overview

The Company’s revenues for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased 18.7% to $284.5 million compared to $239.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Net Income for the quarter improved 7.1% to $22.7 million compared to $21.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Earnings per share on a diluted basis was $0.23 cents, up 9.5% compared to the split adjusted $0.21 cents reported for the second quarter last year.

 

Business Overview

Rollins experienced record revenue and record profits this quarter due to growth within its prior existing base of business and contributions from its most recent acquisition, HomeTeam Pest Defense, Inc. (“HomeTeam”).  New leads in residential pest control, which are an indicator of demand and future growth, grew in the quarter. Historically, the pest control business has proven to be recession resistant.  In economic downturns demand may slow, but in the past the Company has continued to make progress both in revenue and profit growth. 

The Company’s revenues before including HomeTeam’s contribution grew 4.7% for the second quarter, and 18.7% including the $33.7 million second quarter revenue contribution resulting from the HomeTeam acquisition. The quarter’s growth was the result of contributions by both the commercial and residential service lines.  The commercial pest control business, which now represents 39% of the Company’s business, grew 9.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to the 2nd quarter last year. New commercial were 10.0% better compared to the same quarter last year.  Additionally, the Company’s commercial customer retention improved slightly, approximately ½ of a point over last year’s record best.  Residential pest control revenues, which represent a little more than 39% of the Company’s business, grew 2.0% before including HomeTeam’s contribution and with the HomeTeam 30.4% in the second quarter compared to the prior year quarter.  The termite service business, which represents less than 21.0% of the Company’s business, grew 17.2% all due to the HomeTeam acquisition as the existing base of business declined slightly, less than .5%.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company’s gross margin declined by 60 basis points or 48.7% compared to 49.3% last year’s second quarter. Improvements due to greater service technician productivity and a decrease in pension cost which were offset by a $1.4 million increase in fleet cost due to higher cost of fuel and HomeTeam’s higher cost of services provided

Sales, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased $15.2 million or 19.9%, to 32.3% of revenues from 32.0% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2007, due to increased sales salaries, fleet expense and an additional  $ .9 million in expenses related to the acquisition of the HomeTeam.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, sales, general and administrative expenses increased $19.7 million, or 13.7% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 representing 33.1% of revenues compared to 32.6% in last year’s sales, general and administrative expenses.  The increase in sales, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to $2.0 million in non-recurring expenses related to the acquisition of the HomeTeam.

The Company generated $45.0 million in free cash flow (cash provided from operations of $52.1 million less capital expenditures of $7.1 million) year-to-date, representing 9.1% of revenue.  The Company’s strong cash flow allowed it to pay back $36 million of the $90 million borrowed in April 2008 to fund the purchase of HomeTeam Pest Defense.  In addition $8.2 million was expended under the Company’s share buyback program.

Stock Repurchases

During the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 262,775 shares of its $1 par value common stock at a weighted average price of $15.85 per share with a total of 498,775 shares repurchased year to date at a weighted-average price of $16.44 per share. In total, 515,491 additional shares may be purchased under its share repurchase program.

 

HomeTeam Pest Defense

On April 3, 2008, the Company closed the purchase of the HomeTeam Pest Defense. HomeTeam Pest Defense provides termite and pest control services to homebuilders, businesses and homeowners. HomeTeam Pest Defense has a customer base of approximately 400,000 customers, which are served from 50 service locations in 13 states. HomeTeam Pest Defense recorded revenues of approximately $134 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. This acquisition will broaden Rollins’ market share considerably.

 

 

 

HomeTeam was attractive to the Company for a number of reasons. The acquisition provides a strategic opportunity to penetrate a market channel in new home construction that Orkin had not previously pursued. Although home building is lagging at this time, historically it slows but does not stop. More than 90 % of HomeTeam’s business is pest control, servicing residential customers with conventional pest control and termites treatments similar to Orkin along with HomeTeam’s tubes in the wall pest defense systems. Less than 10% of HomeTeam’s revenues come from sales to home builders for installing new systems for future residential customers. HomeTeam has extremely high customer retention rates, one of the highest in the industry, coupled with a very high customer satisfaction rating. Even as home construction has slowed, there are numerous new home owners that have yet to activate their tube in the wall pest defense systems, and the Company expects to benefit from this untapped asset in the future.

With its unique proprietary Taexx tube in the wall system, the HomeTeam business has gained a number of competitive advantages such as significant barriers to entry, great builder acceptance with relationships with 18 of the nations 20 largest builders, and a lower cost to deliver service with high route density in most of its markets. This pest control service is less invasive as the customer does not need to be home for service and as a result, homeowners value this company’s innovative “tubes in the wall” pest control delivery system and consider it a smart home investment. Customer convenience and a high level of quality service provided by HomeTeam have translated into very high customer satisfaction ratings and customer retention.

 

Results of Operations

 

 

Revenues for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased to $284.5 million, an increase of $44.9 million or 18.7% with increases in all areas due to the $33.7 million or 14% increase in second quarter revenues supplied by the HomeTeam acquisition as well as an increase in commercial sales. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, revenues increased to $494.6 million, an increase of $53.7 million or 12.2%. The increase is due to the Company’s efforts to increase commercial business which made up over 42% of the Company’s revenues year-to-date, an increase in the number of sales, better customer retention and the acquisition of HomeTeam which contributed revenues of $33.7 million or 7.7% of the Company’s year-to-date increase. The Company’s foreign operations accounted for less than 8% of total revenues during the second quarter and first six months 2008 and 2007.

 

The revenues of the Company are affected by the seasonal nature of the Company’s pest and termite control services. The increase in pest pressure and activity, as well as the metamorphosis of termites in the spring and summer (the occurrence of which is determined by the timing of the change in seasons), has historically resulted in an increase in the revenue of the Company’s pest and termite control operations during such periods as evidenced by the following chart.

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of Services provided for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased $24.5 million or 20.1%, compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Gross margin for the quarter decreased to 48.7% for the second quarter versus 49.3% in the prior year. $19.7 million of the dollar increase was due to the acquisition of HomeTeam. Margins excluding the impact of HomeTeam improved 40 basis points due to greater service technician productivity and a decrease in pension cost which was partially offset by increase in fleet cost due to higher cost of fuel.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, cost of service provided increased $27.6, or 12.1% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Gross margins remained at 48.2%. Margins excluding the impact of HomeTeam improved 58 basis points due to continued improvements in the cost of risk related to our termite work, greater service technician productivity and reduced pension expense. Claims for the year were 32% less than a year ago and totaled $2.7 million. The excellent claims experience coupled with the favorable resolution of some termite litigation resulted in $1.2 million reduction in our insurance and claim cost. Fleet cost excluding HomeTeam expenses rose $3.0 million or 50 basis points this year driven primarily by the higher cost of fuel.

 

Depreciation and Amortization expenses for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased to $8.7 million, an increase of 25.7% or $1.8 million versus the prior year second quarter due to the $89.7 million assigned to Customer Contracts and Other Intangible Assets as part of the HomeTeam acquisition in the second quarter.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, Depreciation and Amortization increased $1.7 million, an increase of 12.6% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase is due to the acquisition of HomeTeam on April 3, 2008.

 

Sales, General and Administrative Expenses for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased $15.2 million or 19.9%, to 32.3% of revenues from 32.0% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2007. $10.1 million of the dollar increase was due to the addition of HomeTeam. Sales, general and administrative expenses excluding the impact of HomeTeam as a percent of revenues increased 60 basis points due to sales salaries, fleet expense and an additional $0.9 million in expenses related to the acquisition of the HomeTeam.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, sales, general and administrative expenses increased $19.7 million, or 13.7% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 representing 33.1% of revenues compared to 32.6% of revenues in the prior year period. $2.0 million in non-recurring expenses related to the acquisition of the HomeTeam was the most significant factor in the increase.

 

Interest (Income)/Expense for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $0.9 million or 175.3% and $0.7 million or 69.6%, respectively due to interest on outstanding debt related to the April 2008 HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition.

 

Income Taxes for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 increased to $14.6 million or 6.6% and reflects increased pre-tax income over the prior year period. The effective tax rate was 39.1% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008 versus 39.2% for the second quarter ended June 30, 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the effective tax rate was 39.1% versus 39.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company views its critical accounting policies to be those policies that are very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require management’s most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. The

 

 

 

circumstances that make these judgments difficult or complex relate to the need for management to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes its critical accounting policies to be as follows:

 

Accrual for Termite Contracts—The Company maintains an accrual for termite claims representing the estimated costs of reapplications, repairs and associated labor and chemicals, settlements, awards and other costs relative to termite control services. Factors that may impact future cost include chemical life expectancy and government regulation. It is significant that the actual number of claims has decreased in recent years due to changes in the Company’s business practices. However, it is not possible to precisely predict future significant claims. Positive changes to our business practices include revisions made to our contracts, more effective treatment methods that include a directed-liquid and baiting program, more effective termiticides, and expanding training.

Accrued Insurance—The Company self-insures, up to specified limits, certain risks related to general liability, workers’ compensation and vehicle liability. The estimated costs of existing and future claims under the self-insurance program are accrued based upon historical trends as incidents occur, whether reported or unreported (although actual settlement of the claims may not be made until future periods) and may be subsequently revised based on developments relating to such claims. The Company contracts an independent third party actuary on an annual basis to provide the Company an estimated liability based upon historical claims information. The actuarial study is a major consideration, along with management’s knowledge of changes in business practices and existing claims compared to current balances. The reserve is established based on all these factors. Due to the uncertainty associated with the estimation of future loss and expense payments and inherent limitations of the data, actual developments may vary from the Company’s projections. This is particularly true since critical assumptions regarding the parameters used to develop reserve estimates are largely based upon judgment. Therefore, changes in estimates may be material. Management’s judgment is inherently subjective and a number of factors are outside management’s knowledge and control. Additionally, historical information is not always an accurate indication of future events. It should be noted that the number of claims has been decreasing due to the Company’s proactive risk management to develop and maintain ongoing programs. Initiatives that have been implemented include pre-employment screening and an annual motor vehicle report required on all its drivers, utilization of a Global Positioning System that has been fully deployed to Company vehicles, pre-offer physicals for new employees, and pre-hire, random and post-accident drug testing. The Company has improved the time required to report a claim by utilizing a “Red Alert” program that provides serious accident assessment twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week and has instituted a modified duty program that enables employees to go back to work on a limited-duty basis.

Revenue Recognition—The Company’s revenue recognition policies are designed to recognize revenues at the time services are performed. For certain revenue types, because of the timing of billing and the receipt of cash versus the timing of performing services, certain accounting estimates are utilized. Residential and commercial pest control services are primarily recurring in nature on a monthly or bi-monthly basis, while certain types of commercial customers may receive multiple treatments within a given month. In general, pest control customers sign an initial one-year contract, and revenues are recognized at the time services are performed. For pest control customers, the Company offers a discount for those customers who prepay for a full year of services. The Company defers recognition of these advance payments and recognizes the revenue as the services are rendered. The Company classifies the discounts related to the advance payments as a reduction in revenues. Termite baiting revenues are recognized based on the delivery of the individual units of accounting. At the inception of a new baiting services contract upon quality control review of the installation, the Company recognizes revenue for the delivery of the monitoring stations, initial directed liquid termiticide treatment and installation of the monitoring services. The amount deferred is the fair value of monitoring services to be rendered after the initial service. Fair values are generally established based on the prices charged when sold separately by the Company. The amount deferred for the undelivered monitoring element is then recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract term, which results in recognition of revenue in a pattern that approximates the timing of performing monitoring visits. Baiting renewal revenue is deferred and recognized over the annual contract period on a straight-line basis that approximates the timing of performing the required monitoring visits.

Contingency Accruals— The Company is a party to legal proceedings with respect to matters in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, the Company estimates and accrues for its liability and costs associated with the litigation. Estimates and accruals are determined in consultation with outside counsel. Because it is not possible to accurately predict the ultimate result of the litigation, judgments concerning accruals for liabilities and costs associated with litigation are inherently uncertain and actual liability may vary from amounts estimated or accrued. However, in the opinion of management, the outcome of the litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

 

 

 

The Company believes its current cash and cash equivalents balances, future cash flows expected to be generated from operating activities and available borrowings under its $190.0 million credit facilities will be sufficient to finance its current operations and obligations, and fund expansion of the business for the foreseeable future. The Company’s operating activities generated net cash of $52.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $45.5 million for the same period in 2007.

 

The Company invested approximately $7.1 million in capital expenditures during the first six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to $10.1 million during the same period in 2007, and expects to invest less than $9.0 million for the remainder of 2008. Capital expenditures for the first six months consisted primarily of the purchase of equipment replacements and technology related projects. During the first six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company made expenditures for acquisitions totaling $135.8 million, compared to $4.3 million during the same period in 2007. Cash on hand and borrowings under a senior unsecured revolving credit facility primarily funded expenditures for acquisitions. A total of $12.6 million was paid in cash dividends ($0.0125 per share) during the first six months of 2008, compared to $10.2 million or ($0.010 per share) during the same period in 2007. The Company repurchased 262,775 shares during the second quarter of 2008 of its $1 par value common stock at a weighted average price of $15.85 with a total of 498,775 shares repurchased year to date at a weighted-average price of $16.44 per share. The capital expenditures and cash dividends were funded entirely through existing cash balances and operating activities.

 

On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 28, 2008 to acquire, through the purchase of assets, the business of HomeTeam Pest Defense, which provides termite and pest control services to homebuilders, businesses and homeowners. The aggregate amount paid was a combination of $47.7 million in cash on hand, as well as $90.0 million in borrowings from the below mentioned credit facility, totaling $137.7 million. The Company closed the purchase of the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition on April 3, 2008. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, The Company has paid back $36.0 million of the $90.0 million that was borrowed to fund the HomeTeam acquisition.

 

On March 28, 2008, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement with SunTrust Bank and Bank of America, N.A. for an unsecured line of credit of up to $175 million, which includes a $75 million letter of credit subfacility, and a $10 million swingline subfacility. As of June 30, 2008, borrowings of $50.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit and $4.0 million under the swingline subfacility. The Company maintains approximately $35.7 million in letters of credit, which reduces its borrowing capacity under the credit facility. These letters of credit are required by the Company’s fronting insurance companies and/or certain states, due to the Company’s self-insured status, to secure various workers’ compensation and casualty insurance contracts, although the Company believes that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate such claims. The Revolving Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of Rollins’ domestic subsidiaries. The maturity date of all revolving loans under the Credit Agreement is March 27, 2013. Revolving loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at one of the following two rates, at the Company’s election:

 

 

 

 

 

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including, without limitation, certain financial covenants including covenants restricting the Company’s ability to incur certain indebtedness or liens, or to merge or consolidate with or sell substantially all of its assets to another entity. Further, the Revolving Credit Agreement contains financial covenants restricting the Company’s ability to permit the ratio of the Company’s consolidated debt to EBITDA to exceed 2.5 to 1. The Company used $90.0 million of the available line of credit to fund the HomeTeam Pest Defense acquisition.

Orkin, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, is aggressively defending a class action lawsuit filed in Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida. In early April 2002, the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County certified the class action status of Butland et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. et al. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which remanded the case back to the trial court for further findings. In December 2004 the Court issued a new ruling certifying the class action. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals. In June 2006, the Florida Second District Court of Appeals issued a ruling denying certification of the class.  Following the Plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing, the court upheld its prior decision that class certification was improper but also ruled that the Plaintiffs can return to the trial court and attempt to certify a narrower class. Orkin will vigorously oppose any effort by the Plaintiffs to do so.  John Maciel v. Orkin, Inc., et. al. (pending in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California); Ronald and Ileana Krzyzanowsky et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. (pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California); Adam Stauber v. Rollins, Inc. et al. (pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California); and Roy Sheppard et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. and Rollins, Inc. (pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas) is other pending litigation seeking class action certification which to date has not been scheduled for a class certification hearing. Other lawsuits against Orkin, and in some instances the Company, are also being vigorously defended. For further discussion, see the Contingencies section in the notes to the Company financial statements set forth under Item 1 of Part I, above.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

Statements of Financial Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. For financial assets and liabilities, this statement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2007 and does not require any new fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 was issued which delayed the effective date of FASB Statement No. 157 to fiscal years ending after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, including interim periods within that fiscal year. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its existing financial instruments as of June 30, 2008 and the Company has not determined whether or not it will elect this option for financial instruments it may acquire in the future.

Emerging Issues Task Force

In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued Issue 06-11 “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards”. The guidance in EITF Issue 06-11 addresses how an employer should account for the income tax benefits related to dividend or dividend equivalent payments made to employees holding certain share-based payment awards. Entities are required to recognize tax benefits realized from dividend or dividend equivalents paid to employees for certain share-based payment awards as an increase to additional paid-in capital and include such amounts in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. The Company is subject to the provisions of EITF Issue 06-11 as of January 1, 2008. The effect on the consolidated results of operations, cash flow and financial position is immaterial.

 

 

 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

Statements of Financial Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be identified in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the parent’s ownership interest and requires fair value measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in a deconsolidation. The Company will apply the provisions of this statement prospectively, as required, beginning on January 1, 2009 and does not expect the adoption of SFAS 160 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. In general, the statement 1) broadens the guidance of SFAS No. 141, extending its applicability to all events where one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, 2) broadens the use of fair value measurements used to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, 3) changes the accounting for acquisition related fees and restructuring costs incurred in connection with an acquisition, and 4) increases required disclosures. The Company will apply the provisions of this statement prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009 and is currently assessing the impact of adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: 1) How and why an entity uses derivative instruments; 2) How derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and 3) How derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 161 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, “Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, which simply moves the requirements related to which authoritative literature to look to first from the audit standards to GAAP.  SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the PCAOB’s amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.   The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts”, which clarifies how FASB Statement No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises”, applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts issued by insurance enterprises.    The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, including interim periods in that year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 163 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Staff Interpretations

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3, which amends the factors that must be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life over which to amortize the cost of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The FSP requires an entity to consider its own assumptions about renewal or extension of the term of the arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset, and is an attempt to improve consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and the guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and should be included in the two-class method of computing EPS. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,

 

 

 

2008, and interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, the effect of the future adoption of recent accounting pronouncements on the Company’s financial statements; statements regarding management’s expectation regarding the effect of the ultimate resolution of pending legal actions on the Company’s financial position, results of operation and liquidity; management’s belief that future costs of the Company for environmental matters will not be material to the Company’s financial condition, operating results, and liquidity; the expected benefits of the HomeTeam acquisition; the Company’s belief that its current cash and cash equivalent balances, future cash flows expected to be generated from operating activities and available borrowings will be sufficient to finance its current operations and obligations, and fund planned investments for expansion of the business for the foreseeable future; estimated 2008 capital expenditures; the Company’s belief that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate various workers compensation and casualty insurance contracts; and the Company’s belief that interest rate exposure and foreign exchange rate risk will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations going forward. The actual results of the Company could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements because of various risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, the possibility of an adverse ruling against the Company in pending litigation; general economic conditions; market risk; changes in industry practices or technologies; the degree of success of the Company’s termite process reforms and pest control selling and treatment methods; the Company’s ability to identify and integrate potential acquisitions; climate and weather conditions; competitive factors and pricing practices; potential increases in labor costs; and changes in various government laws and regulations, including environmental regulations. All of the foregoing risks and uncertainties are beyond the ability of the Company to control, and in many cases the Company cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. A more detailed discussion of potential risks facing the Company can be found in the Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company does not undertake to update its forward looking statements.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

As of June 30, 2008, the Company maintained an investment portfolio (included in cash and cash equivalents) subject to short-term interest rate risk exposure. The Company is subject to interest rate risk exposure through borrowings on its $175 million credit facility. The Company is also exposed to market risks arising from changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company believes that this foreign exchange rate risk will not have a material effect upon the Company’s results of operations going forward. There have been no material changes to the Company’s market risk exposure since the end of fiscal year 2007.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROL AND PROCEDURES

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of June 30,  2008. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level such that the material information relating to Rollins, Inc., including our consolidated subsidiaries, and required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

 

In addition, except as noted in the following paragraph, management’s quarterly evaluation identified no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As of June 30, 2008, we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore no corrective actions were taken.

 

The Company acquired the HomeTeam Pest Defense business on April 3, 2008. Since the date of acquisition, the Company has been analyzing, evaluating, and implementing changes in HomeTeam’s procedures and controls to determine their effectiveness and to make them consistent with our internal controls and procedures. We have performed additional procedures to review accounting records and substantiate the financial information of HomeTeam included in this report. HomeTeam’s

 

 

 

total revenues following the acquisition accounted for 6.8 percent of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Because the Company's directors have staggered three-year terms, Messrs. Gary W. Rollins, Henry B. Tippie, Wilton Looney, bill J. Dismuke, and Thomas J. Lawley continue to serve as directors of the Company but were not up for reelection at the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 22, 2008.

 

The Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on April 22, 2008. At the meeting, stockholders voted on the following proposals: