☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
☐ |
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
☒ |
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
☐ |
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
|
CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
WINTERGREEN FUND, INC.
WINTERGREEN PARTNERS FUND, LP
WINTERGREEN PARTNERS OFFSHORE MASTER FUND, LTD.
WINTERGREEN ADVISERS, LLC
DAVID J. WINTERS
ELIZABETH N. COHERNOUR
EVAN H. HO
EDWARD W. POLLOCK
|
(Name of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
☒ No fee required.
|
☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
(5) Total fee paid:
|
☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
|
☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
|
(1) Amount previously paid:
|
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
(3) Filing Party:
|
(4) Date Filed:
|
1. |
"We believe that, Wintergreen, being the largest shareholder of CTO has proven its track record of improving the Company's corporate governance structure and shareholder value creation as demonstrated by the following: declassification of the Board, implementation of majority voting, separation of Chairman and CEO and annual say on pay voting."
|
2. |
"We believe that Wintergreen nominees, if elected, will make significant contributions to the Company as evident in their skills, experience and qualifications. Specifically, we take note of Wintergreen's initiative to a more diverse board by nominating Evan H. Ho, who could be the Company's asset in penetrating the real estate market in China and Chinese investors alike."
|
3. |
"We believe that the Company acted hostile to the dissident shareholders in the process of the negotiation because if not for Wintergreen suing the Company, Wintergreen's slate of nominees would not be considered."
|
4. |
"We believe that the Company's Compensation Committee fell short of its fiduciary duties in designing a competitive and fair compensation package that is commensurate to the Company's performance. As a matter of fact, at the 2016 Annual Meeting, 55% of the shareholders rejected the Company's Say on Pay proposal. Despite of the shareholders' manifestation of dissatisfaction, the Compensation Committee still approved the increase of the CFO and General Counsel's base salary, and even granted bonus payouts to the executives."
|