e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8514
Smith International, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-3822631 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1310 Rankin Road
|
|
77073 |
Houston, Texas
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(281) 443-3370
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were
248,507,612 shares of common stock outstanding, net of treasury shares held, on April 26, 2010.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oilfield operations |
|
$ |
1,686,021 |
|
|
$ |
1,841,737 |
|
Distribution operations |
|
|
451,790 |
|
|
|
569,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
2,137,811 |
|
|
|
2,411,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of oilfield revenues |
|
|
1,161,161 |
|
|
|
1,229,191 |
|
Cost of distribution revenues |
|
|
385,470 |
|
|
|
489,986 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
466,301 |
|
|
|
450,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
2,012,932 |
|
|
|
2,169,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
124,879 |
|
|
|
241,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
37,722 |
|
|
|
27,524 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
87,835 |
|
|
|
214,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
41,239 |
|
|
|
70,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
46,596 |
|
|
|
144,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
35,055 |
|
|
|
47,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Smith |
|
$ |
11,541 |
|
|
$ |
96,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
248,360 |
|
|
|
219,201 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
249,761 |
|
|
|
219,603 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
547,775 |
|
|
$ |
988,346 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
1,917,994 |
|
|
|
1,791,498 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,823,950 |
|
|
|
1,820,355 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
71,832 |
|
|
|
65,667 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
144,608 |
|
|
|
149,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,506,159 |
|
|
|
4,815,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,921,950 |
|
|
|
1,923,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
3,074,555 |
|
|
|
3,068,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
592,998 |
|
|
|
614,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
307,050 |
|
|
|
317,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,402,712 |
|
|
$ |
10,739,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
486,360 |
|
|
$ |
358,768 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
666,422 |
|
|
|
589,748 |
|
Accrued payroll costs |
|
|
147,741 |
|
|
|
146,364 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
89,878 |
|
|
|
82,260 |
|
Other |
|
|
204,521 |
|
|
|
233,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,594,922 |
|
|
|
1,410,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,316,589 |
|
|
|
1,814,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
506,493 |
|
|
|
533,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
151,979 |
|
|
|
150,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 5,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued or outstanding in 2010 or 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value; 500,000 shares authorized;
266,430 shares issued in 2010 (266,125 shares issued in 2009) |
|
|
266,430 |
|
|
|
266,125 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,720,006 |
|
|
|
2,706,564 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,907,198 |
|
|
|
2,925,467 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
24,115 |
|
Less Treasury securities, at cost; 17,954 common shares
in 2010 (17,891 common shares in 2009) |
|
|
(483,709 |
) |
|
|
(481,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith stockholders equity |
|
|
5,416,381 |
|
|
|
5,440,567 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,416,348 |
|
|
|
1,389,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
6,832,729 |
|
|
|
6,829,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
10,402,712 |
|
|
$ |
10,739,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46,596 |
|
|
$ |
144,194 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
94,084 |
|
|
|
91,095 |
|
LIFO inventory reserves |
|
|
(4,669 |
) |
|
|
(7,622 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
12,147 |
|
|
|
12,354 |
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
(16,808 |
) |
|
|
13,779 |
|
Provision for losses on receivables |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
5,020 |
|
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss |
|
|
24,289 |
|
|
|
(9,514 |
) |
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(7,651 |
) |
|
|
(11,653 |
) |
Equity earnings, net of dividends received |
|
|
(5,355 |
) |
|
|
(2,976 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(142,019 |
) |
|
|
155,004 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(3,815 |
) |
|
|
78,109 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
78,460 |
|
|
|
(206,066 |
) |
Other current assets and liabilities |
|
|
(28,853 |
) |
|
|
(53,614 |
) |
Other non-current assets and liabilities |
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
(10,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
52,989 |
|
|
|
197,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related payments, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(8,798 |
) |
|
|
(7,236 |
) |
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(96,180 |
) |
|
|
(97,101 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
22,397 |
|
Proceeds from sale of operations |
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
65,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(83,240 |
) |
|
|
(16,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
Principal payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(354,270 |
) |
|
|
(63,981 |
) |
Principal payment of short-term bridge loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
Net change in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(15,803 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,099 |
) |
Settlement of interest rate derivative contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,383 |
) |
Payment of common stock dividends |
|
|
(29,786 |
) |
|
|
(26,290 |
) |
Distributions to noncontrolling joint venture partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
(3,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(400,437 |
) |
|
|
(139,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(9,883 |
) |
|
|
(2,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(440,571 |
) |
|
|
39,001 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
988,346 |
|
|
|
162,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
547,775 |
|
|
$ |
201,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
59,873 |
|
|
$ |
27,554 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
30,082 |
|
|
|
57,138 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
236,726 |
|
|
$ |
1,975,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,885,792 |
|
|
$ |
(73,833 |
) |
|
$ |
(474,448 |
) |
|
$ |
4,549,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,310,970 |
|
|
$ |
5,860,309 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,935 |
|
|
|
47,259 |
|
|
|
144,194 |
|
Changes in fair value of derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,966 |
|
Currency translation adjustments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,542 |
) |
|
|
(4,186 |
) |
|
|
(13,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,935 |
|
|
|
29,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,359 |
|
|
|
43,073 |
|
|
|
169,432 |
|
Common stock dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,372 |
) |
Distribution to noncontrolling joint venture partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Long-term incentive compensation activity |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
9,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
9,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
236,919 |
|
|
$ |
1,984,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,956,355 |
|
|
$ |
(44,409 |
) |
|
$ |
(475,431 |
) |
|
$ |
4,658,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,350,043 |
|
|
$ |
6,008,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
266,125 |
|
|
$ |
2,706,564 |
|
|
$ |
2,925,467 |
|
|
$ |
24,115 |
|
|
$ |
(481,704 |
) |
|
$ |
5,440,567 |
|
|
$ |
1,389,363 |
|
|
$ |
6,829,930 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,541 |
|
|
|
35,055 |
|
|
|
46,596 |
|
Changes in fair value of derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
Currency translation adjustments and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,186 |
) |
|
|
(8,070 |
) |
|
|
(25,256 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,541 |
|
|
|
(17,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,118 |
) |
|
|
26,985 |
|
|
|
20,867 |
|
Common stock dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,810 |
) |
Long-term incentive compensation activity |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
13,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,005 |
) |
|
|
11,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
266,430 |
|
|
$ |
2,720,006 |
|
|
$ |
2,907,198 |
|
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
$ |
(483,709 |
) |
|
$ |
5,416,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,416,348 |
|
|
$ |
6,832,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
6
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All dollar amounts are expressed in thousands, unless otherwise noted)
(Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Smith International, Inc.
and subsidiaries (Smith or the Company) were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Commission) pertaining to interim financial information. These interim financial
statements do not include all information or footnote disclosures required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements and, therefore, should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other current filings with the Commission. All adjustments
that are, in the opinion of management, of a normal and recurring nature and are necessary for a
fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included.
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosed amounts of contingent assets and liabilities and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Management believes the most significant estimates
and assumptions are associated with the valuation of accounts receivables, inventories, goodwill,
indefinite-lived intangibles and deferred taxes as well as the determination of liabilities related
to self-insurance programs. If the underlying estimates and assumptions, upon which the financial
statements are based, change in future periods, actual amounts may differ from those included in the
accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements.
Management believes the consolidated condensed financial statements present fairly the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of the dates indicated. The
results of operations for the interim period presented may not be indicative of results which may
be reported on a fiscal year basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB). On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted a new accounting standard, which amends
previous guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIE). The standard
modifies how an enterprise determines the primary beneficiary that would consolidate the VIE from a
quantitative risks and rewards calculation to a qualitative approach. Such assessment is required
to be performed on a continuous basis and is influenced by, among other things, an enterprises
ability to direct the most significant activities that influence the VIEs operating performance.
The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated condensed financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance with respect to revenue recognition
for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update will allow allocation of consideration
received for qualified separate deliverables based on estimated selling prices for both delivered
and undelivered items when vendor-specific or third-party evidence is not available. Additionally,
disclosure of the nature of multiple element arrangements, the general timing of their delivery,
and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. The
Company is currently evaluating this update, which will be adopted for new revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011.
Management believes the impact of other recently issued standards and updates, which are not yet
effective, will not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows upon adoption.
7
2. Schlumberger Limited Merger Agreement
On February 21, 2010, the Company, Schlumberger Limited (Schlumberger) and Turnberry Merger Sub,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Schlumberger, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
Merger Agreement), pursuant to which Turnberry Merger Sub, Inc. will merge with and into the
Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Schlumberger, and each share of
Company common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.6966 shares of Schlumberger
common stock (the Merger). Completion of the Merger is subject to (i) approval of the Merger by
the stockholders of the Company, (ii) applicable regulatory approvals, including the termination or
expiration of the applicable waiting period (and any extensions thereof) under the U.S.
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and European Community merger
regulations, and (iii) other customary closing conditions. In early April 2010, the parties
received a request for additional information and documentary material, often referred to as a
second request, from the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, which
extends the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.
Under the Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course while
the Merger is pending, and, except as permitted under the Merger Agreement, to generally refrain
from, among other things, acquiring new or selling existing businesses, incurring new indebtedness,
repurchasing Company shares, issuing new common stock or equity awards, or entering into new
material contracts or commitments outside the normal course of business, without the consent of
Schlumberger. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company incurred $15.4 million in expenses
associated with the proposed Merger, which expenses are included within selling, general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated condensed statements of operations.
3. Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes
In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar
Fuertes which modified the official fixed rate from 2.15 Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes per U.S. dollar
to a multi-rate system. The Company accounts for its operations in Venezuela using the U.S. dollar
as its functional currency. Exchange rates used in translating Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes
denominated transactions, assets and liabilities subsequent to the devaluation date are dependent
upon a number of factors, including the nature of contracts and the types of goods and services
provided, which range between
2.6 and 4.3 Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes per U.S. dollar. In connection with the revaluation of its
Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes denominated net asset position, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss of
$23.0 million in the first quarter of 2010, which is included within selling, general and
administrative expenses.
4. Acquisitions and Dispositions
Acquisitions
From time to time, the Company enters into transactions involving the purchase of a full or partial
ownership interest in complementary business operations. No material acquisitions were finalized
during the first quarter of 2010 or 2009.
On April 16, 2010, the Company acquired the remaining 65 percent ownership interest in @Balance,
B.V. (@ Balance) in exchange for cash consideration of
$74.0 million. @Balance is a supplier of managed pressure drilling services. Generally accepted accounting
principles require that an acquirer remeasure its previously held equity interest in an acquiree at
its acquisition date fair value and recognize the resulting gain or loss in earnings. The Company
expects to recognize a pre-tax gain ranging between $15 million and $25 million in the second
quarter of 2010 as a result of remeasuring its previously held equity interest in @Balance.
Dispositions
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company disposed of certain non-core operations acquired in
connection with the
W-H transaction. The Company received cash proceeds of $65.0 million and is entitled to future
consideration in the event financial metrics established under earn-out arrangements are met. The
accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements reflect no gain or loss associated with
the sale of these operations.
8
5. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to the potential dilution of earnings that
could have occurred if additional shares were issued for stock option and restricted stock awards
under the treasury stock method. For each of the periods presented, an immaterial number of
outstanding stock-based awards were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because they were
anti-dilutive. The following schedule reconciles the income and shares used in the basic and
diluted EPS computations
(in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income attributable to Smith |
|
$ |
11,541 |
|
|
$ |
96,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
248,360 |
|
|
|
219,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Smith |
|
$ |
11,541 |
|
|
$ |
96,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
248,360 |
|
|
|
219,201 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,761 |
|
|
|
219,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the average cost
method for the majority of the Companys inventories; however, certain of the Companys U.S.-based
inventories are valued utilizing the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Inventory costs,
consisting of materials, labor and factory overhead, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
170,757 |
|
|
$ |
173,953 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
166,701 |
|
|
|
163,489 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
1,655,558 |
|
|
|
1,656,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,993,016 |
|
|
|
1,994,090 |
|
Reserves to state certain U.S.
inventories (FIFO cost of $807,473 and
$840,326 in 2010 and 2009, respectively)
on a LIFO basis |
|
|
(169,066 |
) |
|
|
(173,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,823,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,820,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
87,847 |
|
|
$ |
88,154 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
363,163 |
|
|
|
357,521 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
1,186,222 |
|
|
|
1,181,269 |
|
Rental tools |
|
|
1,469,043 |
|
|
|
1,435,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,106,275 |
|
|
|
3,062,814 |
|
Less Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,184,325 |
) |
|
|
(1,139,349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,921,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,923,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following table presents goodwill on a segment basis as of the dates indicated as well as
changes in the account during the period shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
|
Oilfield |
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
752,821 |
|
|
$ |
2,264,920 |
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
3,068,828 |
|
Purchase price revisions |
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
758,836 |
|
|
$ |
2,264,632 |
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
3,074,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
The components of other intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Patents |
|
$ |
430,935 |
|
|
$ |
91,125 |
|
|
$ |
339,810 |
|
|
$ |
445,973 |
|
|
$ |
83,387 |
|
|
$ |
362,586 |
|
Trademarks(a) |
|
|
207,807 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
203,063 |
|
|
|
205,031 |
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
|
200,641 |
|
License agreements |
|
|
42,710 |
|
|
|
22,268 |
|
|
|
20,442 |
|
|
|
41,677 |
|
|
|
20,517 |
|
|
|
21,160 |
|
Non-compete
agreements |
|
|
38,445 |
|
|
|
29,531 |
|
|
|
8,914 |
|
|
|
37,928 |
|
|
|
28,410 |
|
|
|
9,518 |
|
Customer relationships
and contracts |
|
|
61,913 |
|
|
|
41,144 |
|
|
|
20,769 |
|
|
|
58,438 |
|
|
|
38,257 |
|
|
|
20,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
781,810 |
|
|
$ |
188,812 |
|
|
$ |
592,998 |
|
|
$ |
789,047 |
|
|
$ |
174,961 |
|
|
$ |
614,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included within the gross carrying amount of trademarks is $195.7 million of
indefinite-lived assets. |
Intangible amortization expense totaled $13.9 million and $12.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The weighted average life for other intangible assets
subject to amortization, which excludes certain indefinite-lived trademarks, approximates 13 years.
Amortization expense on existing intangible assets is expected to
approximate $53 million for fiscal year 2010 and is
anticipated to range between $32 million and $47 million per year for the 2011 2014 fiscal
years.
Changes during the first quarter of 2010 to the gross carrying amounts of goodwill and other
components of intangible assets primarily relate to revisions of preliminary purchase price
allocations for 2009 acquisitions.
9. Debt
The following summarizes the Companys outstanding debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
71,464 |
|
|
$ |
87,267 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
414,896 |
|
|
|
271,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
486,360 |
|
|
$ |
358,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes, net of unamortized discounts |
|
$ |
1,493,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,493,634 |
|
Revolving credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans |
|
|
237,767 |
|
|
|
592,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731,485 |
|
|
|
2,085,755 |
|
Less Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(414,896 |
) |
|
|
(271,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,316,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,814,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company used a portion of the cash received in the
November 2009 equity offering to repay $370.1 million of outstanding borrowings under various loan
agreements. Additionally, $220.0 million of senior notes maturing in February 2011 and classified
as long-term debt as of December 31, 2009 are classified within the current portion of long-term
debt as of March 31, 2010.
In December 2009, the Company entered into a $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility
provided by a syndicate of financial institutions, under which M-I SWACO can utilize up to $125
million. The revolving credit agreement allows for the election of interest at a base rate or a
Eurodollar rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points, and requires the payment of a quarterly commitment
fee of 37.5 basis points on the unutilized portion of the facility. The credit facility, which
expires in March 2013, contains customary covenants, a debt-to-total capitalization limitation and
remained undrawn at March 31, 2010. Additionally, the Company has a $375.0 million unsecured
revolving credit facility, which expires in July 2010 and was undrawn at March 31, 2010.
Principal payments of long-term debt for the twelve-month periods ending subsequent to March 31,
2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
22,652 |
|
2012 |
|
|
19,957 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
299,410 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
974,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,316,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company was in compliance with its loan covenants under the various loan indentures, as
amended, at March 31, 2010.
10. Derivative Financial Instruments
The nature of the Companys business activities involves the management of various financial and
market risks, including those related to changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates. In
an effort to mitigate these risks, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments, which
are accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges in accordance with the authoritative accounting
standard. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
For foreign exchange and interest rate derivative instruments that do not qualify as cash flow
hedges, realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized currently through earnings.
Foreign exchange hedge contracts not designated as cash flow hedges with a notional amount of
$134.5 million and $114.5 million were outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
For foreign exchange and interest rate derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges,
realized and unrealized gains and losses are deferred to accumulated other comprehensive income
(AOCI) and recognized in the consolidated statements of operations when the hedged item affects
earnings. At March 31, 2010, the Company had one outstanding interest rate cash flow hedge
contract with a notional amount of $59.9 million and various outstanding foreign exchange cash flow
hedge contracts with notional amounts totaling $26.6 million. At December 31, 2009, the Company
had one outstanding interest rate cash flow hedge contract with a notional amount of $63.9 million
and no outstanding foreign exchange cash flow hedge contracts. Approximately $3.2 million of
losses deferred in AOCI related to cash flow foreign exchange and interest rate derivative
contracts, or $1.5 million net of taxes and noncontrolling interests, will be reclassified into
earnings during the remainder of fiscal 2010.
The Company has recognized $7.0 million of derivative contract losses in the consolidated condensed
statements of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. During the first quarter
of 2009, the Company recognized $7.1 million of derivative contract losses and a $2.4 million
mark-to-market interest rate derivative loss on a non-qualifying cash flow hedge contract.
11
The following table provides required information with respect to the classification and loss
amounts recognized in income as well as the derivative-related contract losses deferred in AOCI for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Location of |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
as Cash Flow Hedging |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassified |
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
Instruments |
|
in AOCI |
|
|
from AOCI to Income |
|
AOCI to Income |
|
|
(Ineffective) |
|
(Ineffective) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(357 |
) |
|
$ |
(490 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(869 |
) |
|
$ |
(642 |
) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
Cost of oilfield revenues |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1,488 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,551 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(920 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,050 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
Recognized in Income |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
(6,043 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of outstanding foreign exchange derivative instruments is determined using
composite pricing from published financial market sources whereas the fair value of the outstanding
interest rate derivative instruments is determined by obtaining quoted prices in active markets for
similar contracts. Both measurement methodologies are classified as Level Two tier under the
applicable accounting standard. The recorded fair value of derivative instruments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Classification |
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
$ |
2,648 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(4,146 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,623 |
) |
|
Other current liabilities |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
Derivatives Not Designated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(7,074 |
) |
|
|
(4,138 |
) |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(12,151 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Instruments
The fair value of outstanding long-term debt instruments is determined using quoted prices for
similar debt instruments, which is classified as a Level Two tier measurement methodology under the
applicable accounting standard. At March 31, 2010, the fair value of long-term debt instruments
approximated $2.05 billion and the recorded value totaled $1.73 billion. The fair and recorded
values of long-term debt instruments totaled $2.33 billion and $2.09 billion, respectively, at
December 31, 2009.
The fair value of the remaining financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
receivables, payables and short-term borrowings, approximates the carrying value due to the nature
of these instruments.
12
11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheets
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
14,042 |
|
|
$ |
31,290 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
(2,747 |
) |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
(4,839 |
) |
|
|
(4,901 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
$ |
24,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Long-Term Incentive Compensation
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding restricted stock and stock option awards granted
under the Third Amended and Restated 1989 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the LTIC Plan).
As of March 31, 2010, approximately 775 thousand shares were authorized for future issuance pursuant to the
LTIC Plan.
Restricted Stock
The restricted stock program consists of a combination of performance-based restricted stock units
(performance-based units) and time-based restricted stock units (time-based units). The number
of performance-based units issued under the program, which can range from zero to 150 percent of
the target units granted, is solely dependent upon financial metrics achieved by the Company in the
fiscal year subsequent to the award. Activity under the Companys restricted stock program for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2010 is presented below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-Based Awards |
|
|
Performance-Based Awards |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
No. of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
No. of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value(a) |
|
|
Units(b) |
|
|
Value(a) |
|
|
Stock Units |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,366 |
|
|
$ |
29.33 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
$ |
27.52 |
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
Granted |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
30.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
27.61 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
43.18 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
22.82 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
29.36 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
28.17 |
|
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the weighted average grant date fair value.
|
|
(b) |
|
Performance-based units outstanding assume achievement of target level financial metrics related to the December 2009 grants. |
Restrictions on approximately 1.2 million restricted stock units outstanding at March 31, 2010
are expected to lapse and issue during the 2010 fiscal year.
Stock Options
Activity under the Companys stock option program for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010
is presented below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Option |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
20.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
18.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
and exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
20.19 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
22,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Share-based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense, consisting of restricted stock and stock option awards, was $12.1
million and $12.4 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Assuming achievement of target-level financial metrics for performance-based awards granted in
December 2009, unrecognized share-based compensation expense totaled $97.4 million for awards
outstanding as of March 31, 2010. After adjusting for taxes and noncontrolling interests,
approximately $62.3 million of additional share-based compensation is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 2.4 years.
13. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the March 2010 quarter was 47.0 percent as compared to 32.8 percent for
the prior-year period. The Companys current quarter results include $23.0 million of losses
related to devaluation of the Venezuelan local currency denominated net asset position and certain
business combination transaction-related expenses for which no tax benefit was recognized. On a
combined basis, the effect of these items accounted for the year-over-year increase in the
effective tax rate. The consolidated tax provision assumes completion of the proposed Merger as
well as other business combination transactions. If these transactions do not close, an additional
tax benefit would be recorded.
14. Industry Segments and International Operations
The Company is a global provider of products and services used during the drilling, completion and
production phases of oil and natural gas development activities. Our business is segregated into
three operating segments, M-I SWACO, Smith Oilfield and Distribution, which is the basis upon which
we report our results.
The M-I SWACO segment consists of a majority-owned drilling fluid and environmental services joint
venture operation. The Smith Oilfield segment is comprised of our wholly-owned drilling and
completion services operations, which includes drill bits, directional drilling services and
downhole tools. The Distribution segment consists of the Wilson distribution operations and a
majority-owned interest in CE Franklin Ltd., a publicly-traded Canadian distribution company.
Finally, general corporate primarily reflects expenses related to corporate personnel,
administrative support functions and long-term incentive compensation programs.
The following table presents consolidated revenues by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
838,432 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,540 |
|
Canada |
|
|
227,713 |
|
|
|
192,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
1,066,145 |
|
|
|
1,281,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America |
|
|
270,809 |
|
|
|
276,107 |
|
Europe/Africa |
|
|
541,454 |
|
|
|
539,815 |
|
Middle East/Asia |
|
|
259,403 |
|
|
|
313,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-North America |
|
|
1,071,666 |
|
|
|
1,129,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,137,811 |
|
|
$ |
2,411,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
The following table presents financial information for each reportable segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
1,111,190 |
|
|
$ |
1,159,337 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
574,831 |
|
|
|
682,400 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
451,790 |
|
|
|
569,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,137,811 |
|
|
$ |
2,411,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
120,404 |
|
|
$ |
147,508 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
56,548 |
|
|
|
105,765 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
General corporate |
|
|
(56,775 |
) |
|
|
(27,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
124,879 |
|
|
$ |
241,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize charges, included within selling, general and administrative
expenses, on a reportable segment basis:
For the three-months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (Provision) |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Cost |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Net |
|
Venezuelan currency devaluation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
11,646 |
|
|
$ |
(3,166 |
) |
|
$ |
5,925 |
|
|
$ |
8,887 |
|
General corporate |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,976 |
|
|
|
(2,658 |
) |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
19,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business combination transaction-related costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
General corporate |
|
|
15,392 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,555 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
15,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,531 |
|
|
$ |
(1,866 |
) |
|
$ |
6,390 |
|
|
$ |
35,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges incurred in the March 2010 quarter include a $23.0 million charge associated with the
Venezuelan governments devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes, resulting in a revaluation
of the Companys Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes denominated net asset position. The quarter also
includes $16.6 million in transaction-related charges, primarily attributable to expenses
associated with the proposed Merger.
For the three-months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (Provision) |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Cost |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Net |
|
Employee severance and other costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
19,301 |
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,023 |
|
|
$ |
7,528 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
12,359 |
|
|
|
4,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,034 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,311 |
|
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
7,023 |
|
|
|
15,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contract-related loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General corporate |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,792 |
|
|
$ |
10,172 |
|
|
$ |
7,023 |
|
|
$ |
17,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges incurred during the first quarter of 2009 are attributable to severance-related expenses of
$31.0 million associated with a reduction in North American personnel levels and $1.3
million in facility closure costs. During the quarter, the Company also recognized a $2.5 million
loss on an interest rate derivative contract.
15
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
Subsequent to the announcement of the proposed Merger, five putative class action lawsuits were
commenced on behalf of stockholders of the Company against the Company and its directors and in
certain cases against Schlumberger and one of its affiliates, challenging the proposed transaction.
Four of the lawsuits were filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, which have been
consolidated into a single action in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas
(the Texas Action), and one lawsuit is pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the Delaware
Action, and collectively with the Texas Action, the Actions). The plaintiff in the Texas Action
has filed a First Amended Petition. The Actions variously allege that the Companys directors
breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, causing Smith to enter into the Merger
Agreement at an allegedly inadequate and unfair price and agreeing to transaction terms that
improperly inhibit alternative transactions. The Texas Action separately alleges that the Company
aided and abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties, and both Actions allege that
Schlumberger aided and abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints seek,
among other things, an injunction barring defendants from consummating the proposed transaction,
declaratory relief and attorneys fees. The parties in the Texas Action and Delaware Action have
agreed to an expedited discovery schedule and to the coordination of pleadings and discovery in
advance of any preliminary injunction hearing, which will be heard only in the Texas Action. On
April 19, 2010, the court in the Delaware Action approved the parties agreement concerning the
coordination of the Texas and Delaware actions and agreed to otherwise stay the Delaware
proceedings through any preliminary injunction hearing in Texas. The Company believes that the
lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend these lawsuits vigorously.
The Company is also a defendant in various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
M-I SWACO Noncontrolling Interest
If the proposed Merger is not consummated, either the Company or its M-I SWACO joint venture
partner, Schlumberger, can offer to sell to the other party its entire ownership interest in the
joint venture in exchange for a cash purchase price specified by the offering partner. If the
initiating partners offer to sell is not accepted, such party is obligated to purchase the other
partys interest at the same valuation per interest. If the Company agrees to purchase
Schlumbergers joint venture interest, whether pursuant to these provisions or otherwise, Smith
would need to fund the transaction. The Companys funding could include issuing equity, resulting
in dilution to existing stockholders, obtaining additional debt, which may require waivers of
applicable debt covenants, or obtaining other financing, as well as using available cash to fund
the purchase. Should the Company instead not purchase Schlumbergers interest, the Company would
no longer have an interest in the joint venture.
Standby Letters of Credit
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, the Company is contingently
liable for performance under standby letters of credit and bid, performance and surety bonds.
Certain of these outstanding instruments guarantee payment to insurance companies with respect to
certain liability coverages of the Companys insurance captive. Excluding the impact of these
instruments, for which $19.1 million of related liabilities are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated condensed balance sheet, the Company was contingently liable for approximately $252
million of standby letters of credit and bid, performance and surety bonds at March 31, 2010.
Management does not expect any material amounts to be drawn on these instruments.
Insurance
The Company maintains insurance coverage for various aspects of its business and operations. The
Company has elected to retain a portion of losses that occur through the use of deductibles and
retentions under its insurance programs. Amounts in excess of the self-insured retention levels
are fully insured to limits believed appropriate for the Companys operations. Self-insurance
accruals are based on claims filed and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. While
management believes that amounts accrued in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial
statements are adequate for expected liabilities arising from the Companys portion of losses,
estimates of these liabilities may change as circumstances develop.
16
Environmental
The Company routinely establishes and reviews the adequacy of reserves for estimated future
environmental clean-up costs for properties currently or previously operated by the Company. In
the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations is provided to assist readers in understanding the Companys financial performance
during the periods presented and significant trends which may impact the future performance of the
Company. This discussion includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements of the Company and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, the
Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other current filings with the Commission.
Recent Developments
Schlumberger Limited Merger Agreement
On February 21, 2010, the Company, Schlumberger Limited (Schlumberger) and Turnberry Merger Sub,
Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Schlumberger, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement), pursuant to which Turnberry Merger Sub, Inc. will merge with and into the Company,
with the Company surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Schlumberger, and each share of Company
common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.6966 shares of Schlumberger common stock
(the Merger). Completion of the Merger is subject to (i) approval of the Merger by the
stockholders of the Company, (ii) applicable regulatory approvals, including the termination or
expiration of the applicable waiting period (and any extensions thereof) under the
U.S. Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and European Community
merger regulations, and (iii) other customary closing conditions. In early April 2010, the parties
received a request for additional information and documentary material, often referred to as
second request, from the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, which
extends the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.
Under the Merger Agreement, the Company agreed to conduct its business in the ordinary course while
the Merger is pending, and, except as permitted under the Merger Agreement, to generally refrain
from, among other things, acquiring new or selling existing businesses, incurring new indebtedness,
repurchasing Company shares, issuing new capital stock or equity awards, or entering into new
material contracts or commitments outside the ordinary course of business, without the consent of
Schlumberger. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company incurred $15.4 million in expenses
associated with the proposed Merger, which expenses are included within selling, general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated condensed statements of operations.
Stockholder Litigation
Subsequent to the announcement of the proposed Merger, five putative class action lawsuits were
commenced on behalf of stockholders of the Company against the Company and its directors, and in
certain cases against Schlumberger and one of its affiliates, challenging the Merger. Four of the
lawsuits were filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, which have been consolidated
into a single action in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas (the Texas
Action), and one lawsuit is pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the Delaware Action, and
collectively with the Texas Action, the Actions). The plaintiff in the Texas Action has filed a
First Amended Petition. The Actions variously allege that the Companys directors breached their
fiduciary duties by, among other things, causing Smith to enter into the proposed transaction at an
allegedly inadequate and unfair price and agreeing to transaction terms that improperly inhibit
alternative transactions. The Texas Action separately alleges that the Company aided and abetted
the directors breaches of fiduciary duties, and both Actions allege that Schlumberger aided and
abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints seek, among other things, an
injunction barring defendants from consummating the proposed transaction, declaratory relief and
attorneys fees. The parties in the Texas Action and Delaware Action have agreed to an expedited
discovery schedule and to the coordination of pleadings and discovery in advance of any preliminary
injunction hearing, which will be heard only in the Texas Action. On April 19, 2010, the court in
the Delaware Action approved the parties agreement concerning the coordination of the Texas and
Delaware actions and agreed to otherwise stay the Delaware proceedings through any preliminary
injunction hearing in Texas. The Company believes that the lawsuits are without merit and intends
to defend these lawsuits vigorously.
18
Where to Find Additional Information
Additional information about Schlumberger is included in documents that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Additional information concerning the Merger is contained in Item 1A, Risk Factors, and in the proxy statement/prospectus and registration statement
filed with the SEC on April 27, 2010. STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND REGISTRATION
STATEMENT REGARDING THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION AS IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED
TRANSACTION. These materials are available to the stockholders of Smith at no expense to them. Investors and security holders are able to obtain
the documents free of charge at the SECs website, www.sec.gov. In addition, such materials (and all other documents filed with the SEC) are available free of charge at www.smith.com or www.slb.com. A stockholder may also read and copy any reports,
statements and other information filed by Smith or Schlumberger with the SEC at the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at (800) 732-0330 or visit the SECs website for further information on its public reference room.
Each companys directors and executive officers and other persons may be deemed, under SEC rules, to be participants in the solicitation of proxies
in connection with the proposed transaction. Information regarding Schlumbergers directors can be found in its proxy statement filed with the SEC
on March 4, 2010 and officers can be found in its 2009 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 5, 2010. Information regarding Smiths directors
can be found in the proxy statement/prospectus filed on April 27, 2010 and officers can be found in Smiths 2009 Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 1, 2010. Additional information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation and a description of their direct and indirect interests in the
transaction, by security holdings or otherwise, are contained in the proxy statement/prospectus filed on April 27, 2010 and other relevant materials to
be filed with the SEC.
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes
In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation of the Venezuelan Bolivar
Fuertes which modified the official fixed rate from 2.15 Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes per U.S. dollar
to a multi-rate system. The Company accounts for its operations in Venezuela using the U.S. dollar
as its functional currency. Exchange rates used in translating Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes
denominated transactions, assets and liabilities subsequent to the devaluation date are dependent
upon a number of factors, including the nature of contracts and the types of goods and services
provided, which range between
2.6 and 4.3 Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes per U.S. dollar. In connection with the revaluation of its
Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes denominated net asset position, the Company recorded a pre-tax loss of
$23.0 million in the first quarter of 2010, which is included within selling, general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated condensed statements of operations.
Company Products and Operations
The Company is a leading global provider of premium products and services used during the drilling,
completion and production phases of oil and natural gas exploration and development activities. We
provide a comprehensive line of technologically-advanced products and engineering services,
including drilling and completion fluid systems, solids-control and separation equipment,
waste-management services, three-cone and diamond drill bits, borehole enlargement services,
tubulars, directional systems, measurement-while-drilling and logging-while-drilling services,
coiled tubing, cased-hole wireline and other complementary downhole tools and services. The
Company also offers supply-chain management solutions through an extensive North American branch
network providing pipe, valves and fittings as well as mill, safety and other maintenance products.
The Companys operations are driven principally by the level of exploration and production (E&P)
spending in major energy-producing regions around the world and the depth and complexity of these
projects. Although E&P spending is significantly influenced by the market price of oil and natural
gas, it may also be affected by supply and demand fundamentals, finding and development costs,
decline and depletion rates, environmental concerns, the
financial condition of independent E&P companies, the overall level of global economic growth
and activity, and political actions and uncertainties including, but not
limited to, increased taxation and royalties. In addition, approximately five percent of the Companys consolidated revenues
relate to the downstream energy sector, including petrochemical plants and refineries, whose
spending is largely impacted by the general condition of the
U.S. economy.
19
Capital investment by energy companies is largely divided into two markets, which vary greatly in
terms of primary business drivers and associated volatility levels. North American drilling
activity is primarily influenced by natural gas fundamentals, with
approximately 60 percent of the
first quarter 2010 rig count focused on natural gas finding and development activities. Conversely, drilling
in areas outside of North America is more dependent on crude oil fundamentals, which influence
three-quarters of international drilling activity. Historically, business in markets outside of
North America has proved to be less volatile as the high cost E&P programs in these regions are
generally undertaken by major oil companies, consortiums and national oil companies as part of a
longer-term strategic development plan. Although approximately half of the Companys consolidated
revenues were generated in North America during the first quarter of 2010, Smiths profitability
was influenced by business levels in markets outside of North America. The Distribution segment,
which accounts for 21 percent of consolidated revenues and primarily supports a North American
customer base, masks the geographic revenue mix of the Companys oilfield operations. Excluding
the impact of the Distribution segment, approximately 62 percent of the Companys revenues were
generated in markets outside of North America during the first quarter of 2010.
Business Outlook
The Companys current year results will be influenced by worldwide drilling activity and the
general state of the global economic environment. On a worldwide basis, drilling activity is
currently expected to increase moderately over 2009 levels. The majority of the anticipated
increase is expected in the North
American market, which is largely dependent on natural gas
fundamentals. Markets outside of North America, which focus on oil-directed activities, will be
influenced by global energy demand and oil-targeted drilling projects. Near-term activity levels
will likely be influenced by the annual spring break-up in Canada, which limits land-based drilling
activity in that market during a portion of the second quarter. Seasonal drilling restrictions
have resulted in a significant decline in the Canadian rig count from the levels reported for the
first quarter of 2010, which will likely contribute to a temporary decline in average worldwide
drilling activity for the second quarter. Although additional deterioration in the global economic
environment could lead to lower exploration and production spending, further reducing demand for
the Companys products and services and adversely impacting future results, the long-term outlook
for the energy sector is favorable due to supply and demand fundamentals.
The Merger
Agreement with Schlumberger contains a number of restrictions on the
Companys operations during
the pendency of the Merger. Smiths ability to implement its business plan and respond to market
conditions will be subject to compliance with these restrictions. Further information on these
restrictions can be found in the Merger Agreement and in the proxy statement/prospectus filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2010.
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, concerning, among other things, our outlook, financial
projections and business strategies, all of which are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms such as
anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, project, should and similar terms.
These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses that we believe are appropriate
under the circumstances. Such statements are subject to, among other things, satisfaction of the
closing conditions to the Merger, the risk that the contemplated Merger does not occur, negative
effects from the pendency of the Merger, the ability to successfully integrate the merged
businesses and to realize expected synergies, the risk that we will not be able to retain key
employees, expenses of the Merger, overall demand for and pricing of the Companys products and
services, general economic and business conditions, the level of oil and natural gas exploration
and development activities, global economic growth and activity, political stability of
oil-producing countries, finding and development costs of operations, decline and depletion rates
for oil and natural gas wells, seasonal weather conditions, industry conditions, and changes in
laws or regulations and other risk factors that are discussed beginning on page 29 of this Form
10-Q, in the Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and other documents
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, many of which are beyond the control of the
Company. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions
prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those expected, estimated or projected.
Management believes these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, a stockholder should
not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based only on our current
expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake
no obligation to publicly update or revise any of them in light of new information, future events
or otherwise.
20
Results of Operations
Segment Discussion
Our business is segregated into three operating segments, M-I SWACO, Smith Oilfield and
Distribution, which is the basis upon which we report our results. The M-I SWACO segment consists
of a majority-owned drilling fluid and environmental services joint venture operation. The Smith
Oilfield segment is comprised of our wholly-owned drilling and completion services operations,
which includes drill bits, directional drilling services and downhole tools. The Distribution
segment consists of the Wilson distribution operations and a majority-owned interest in CE
Franklin, Ltd., a publicly-traded Canadian distribution company. Finally, general corporate
primarily reflects expenses related to corporate personnel, administrative support functions and
long-term incentive compensation programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Financial Data: (Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
1,111,190 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
$ |
1,159,337 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
574,831 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
682,400 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
451,790 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
569,742 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,137,811 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
2,411,479 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
239,959 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
259,889 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
284,532 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
397,481 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
313,941 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
432,170 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United States |
|
|
838,432 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1,089,540 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
|
61,470 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
40,926 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
48,733 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
37,938 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
117,510 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
113,420 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Canada |
|
|
227,713 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
192,284 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-North America: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
|
809,761 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
858,522 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
241,566 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
246,981 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
20,339 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
24,152 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-North America |
|
|
1,071,666 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1,129,655 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
2,137,811 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
2,411,479 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-I SWACO |
|
$ |
120,404 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
147,508 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Smith Oilfield |
|
|
56,548 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
105,765 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
4,702 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
General corporate |
|
|
(56,775 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(27,116 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
124,879 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
241,678 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Market Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Worldwide Rig
Count: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Canada |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Non-North America |
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4,449 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Offshore |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
4,449 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Commodity Prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil ($/Bbl) (2) |
|
$ |
78.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas ($/mcf) (3) |
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Source: M-I SWACO (2009 revised effective January
2010). |
|
(2) |
|
Average daily West Texas Intermediate (WTI) spot closing prices, as quoted by NYMEX. |
|
(3) |
|
Average daily Henry Hub, Louisiana spot closing prices, as quoted by NYMEX. |
M-I SWACO
Revenues
M-I SWACO primarily provides drilling and completion fluid systems, engineering and technical
services to the oil and gas industry. Additionally, these operations provide oilfield production
chemicals and manufacture and market equipment and services used for solids control, particle
separation, pressure control, rig instrumentation and waste management.
M-I SWACO is significantly influenced by its exposure to the global offshore market, which
constitutes 50 percent of the revenue base, and to exploration and production spending for
land-based projects outside of North America, which contributes approximately 30 percent of the
segments revenues. The remaining 20 percent of M-I SWACOs revenues are derived from customer
spending for North American land-based projects. Offshore drilling programs, which accounted for
13 percent of the worldwide rig count in the first quarter of 2010, are generally more revenue
intensive than land-based projects due to the complex nature of the related drilling environment.
M-I SWACO reported revenues of $1.1 billion for the first quarter of 2010, four percent below the
March 2009 period. The majority of the period-to-period revenue decline was concentrated in the
Middle East/Asia region, where customer spending for drilling and completion fluids as well as
waste management services declined primarily due to the timing of certain customer projects.
Within North America, the impact of a 22 percent decline in drilling activity in the
revenue-intensive U.S. offshore sector on demand for drilling and completion fluids was partially
offset by higher land-based activity.
Operating Income
Operating income for the M-I SWACO segment totaled $120.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, translating into operating margins of 10.8 percent. Operating margins declined two
percentage points from the prior-year period, reflecting the impact of lower offshore activity on
demand for premium fluids, a reduction in higher-margin waste management services and lower overall
pricing. On an absolute dollar basis, operating income was $27.1 million below the prior years
level, impacted by lower revenue volumes and product mix factors. After excluding an $11.6 million
charge associated with the Venezuelan currency devaluation and $1.2 million of business combination
transaction-related charges in the March 2010 quarter, and
excluding $19.3 million of severance-related
charges in the March 2009 quarter, operating income declined $33.6 million from the comparable
prior-year period.
22
Smith Oilfield
Revenues
The Smith Oilfield segment provides three-cone and diamond drill bits, tubulars, borehole
enlargement tools, drill motors, directional drilling, measurement-while-drilling, and
logging-while-drilling services, as well as completions, coiled tubing, cased-hole wireline and
drilling related services. The Smith Oilfield segment has a high level of North American exposure
with 58 percent of revenues concentrated in those markets, driven in part, by the significance of
increased unconventional drilling projects in the U.S. land-based market and the complexity of
drilling programs, which drive demand for a wider range of product offerings. For the three months
ended March 31, 2010, Smith Oilfields revenues totaled $574.8 million, a 16 percent decline from
the comparable prior-year period, driven by reduced demand for premium tubular products,
U.S. pricing pressures and lower tender sales of three-cone drill bits.
Operating Income
Operating income for the Smith Oilfield segment was $56.5 million, or 9.8 percent of revenues, for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. Operating margins declined six percentage points from the
prior-year period reflecting the loss of a significant proportion of fixed-cost rental and service
offering revenue, U.S. pricing pressures and a decrease in higher-relative margin drill bit sales.
On an absolute dollar basis, operating income was $49.2 million below the prior years level,
influenced by reduced business volumes and lower product pricing. After excluding $12.4 million in
employee severance charges incurred in the prior-year quarter, operating income was $61.6 million
below the March 2009 quarter.
Distribution
Revenues
The Distribution segment markets pipe, valves, fittings and mill, safety and other maintenance
products to energy and industrial markets, primarily through an extensive network of supply
branches in the United States and Canada. The segment has the most significant North American
revenue exposure of any of the Companys operations with 95 percent of first quarter 2010 revenues
generated in those markets. Moreover, approximately 24 percent of the segments revenues relate to
sales to the downstream energy sector, including petrochemical plants and refineries, whose
spending is largely influenced by the general state of the U.S. economic environment.
Additionally, certain customers in this sector utilize petroleum products as a base material and,
accordingly, are impacted by crude oil and natural gas prices. Distribution revenues totaled
$451.8 million for the first quarter of 2010, a decline of 21 percent from the comparable
prior-year period. The reduction in revenue was concentrated in the U.S. market and attributable
primarily to reduced customer project spending for line pipe.
Operating Income
Operating income for the Distribution segment was $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, $10.8 million below the prior-year level reflecting the impact of the significant reduction
in revenue levels. After excluding $0.7 million in charges
related to cost-reduction initiatives incurred in the March 2009 quarter, operating results were $11.5 million below the comparable
prior-year period.
General Corporate
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for general corporate totaled $56.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, an increase of $29.7 million over the prior-year period. The year-over-year comparison was
influenced by charges reported in the first quarters of 2010 and 2009. During the first
quarter of 2010, the Company incurred $15.4 million of expenses associated with the proposed
Merger and an $11.3 million charge associated with the
Companys revaluation of its Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes denominated net asset position. In the
comparable prior-year period, the Company recognized a
$2.5 million loss on an interest-rate
contract. After excluding these charges, operating expenses increased $5.5 million from
the March 2009 quarter, attributable in part to higher expenses
associated with the Companys recent debt placements and
incentive compensation programs.
23
Consolidated Results
For the periods indicated, the following table summarizes the results of operations of the Company
and presents these results as a percentage of total revenues (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,137,811 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
2,411,479 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
591,180 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
692,302 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
466,301 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
450,624 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
124,879 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
241,678 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
37,722 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
27,524 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
87,835 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
214,512 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
41,239 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
70,318 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Noncontrolling interests in net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
35,055 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
47,259 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Smith |
|
$ |
11,541 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
96,935 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues were $2.1 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of 11
percent from the level reported in the comparable 2009 period. Over 90 percent of the
year-over-year decline in revenue was reported in the U.S. market, influenced by continued lower
customer demand for tubular products, including line pipe and premium drill collars and pipe, as
well as three-cone drill bits. The unfavorable revenue comparison also reflects the impact of a
decline in drilling activity in the offshore sector and 2009 market-driven pricing contraction for
the Companys products and services in response to the sharp fall in activity levels in the United
States. Revenues outside of the United States decreased two percent from the first quarter of 2009
due to the influence of the timing of customer activity on demand for drilling and completion
fluids and waste management systems in the Middle East/Far East region, partially offset by the
effect of higher activity levels in Canada.
Gross profit decreased $101.1 million, or 15 percent, from the prior-year period to $591.2 million
for the first quarter of 2010. The gross profit decline is attributable to the period-to-period
reduction in revenues across all business segments as well as lower pricing due to competitive
pressures in the U.S. market and the extension or award of a number of long-term contracts in 2009.
Consolidated gross profit margins were 27.7 percent in the first quarter of 2010, contracting one
percentage point from the prior-year level. The gross margin deterioration was reported within the
oilfield-related operations reflecting the impact of a shift in revenue mix and lower overall pricing.
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $466.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, a three percent increase over the amounts reported in the prior-year quarter. The
reported expenses during the first quarter 2010 were influenced by a $23.0 million charge
associated with the revaluation of the Companys Venezuelan Bolivar Fuertes denominated net asset
position and $16.6 million in business combination transaction-related expenses, primarily
associated with the proposed Merger. The comparable prior-year quarter included $32.3 million in
employee severance-related costs and a $2.5 million loss on an interest-rate contract. After excluding
these charges from the respective periods, selling, general and administrative expenses rose $10.9
million from the prior-year period reflecting a shift in revenue mix and continued investment in
infrastructure to support international growth.
Net interest expense, which represents interest expense less interest income, equaled $37.0 million
in the first quarter of 2010. The $9.9 million year-over-year reported increase in net interest
expense is attributable to higher interest rates associated with the refinancing of short-term
indebtedness with a fixed-rate debt issuance during March of 2009 and was partially offset by
reduced debt levels.
24
The effective tax rate for the March 2010 quarter was 47.0 percent as compared to 32.8 percent for
the prior-year period. The Companys current quarter results include $23.0 million of losses
related to devaluation of the Venezuelan local currency denominated net asset position and certain
business combination transaction-related expenses for which no tax benefit was recognized. On a
combined basis, the effect of these items accounted for the year-over-year increase in the
effective tax rate. After excluding non-deductible charges reported in 2010, the effective tax
rates for both periods were lower than the U.S. statutory rate due to the impact of M-I SWACOs
U.S. partnership earnings for which the noncontrolling interest partner is directly responsible for
its related income taxes. The Company properly consolidates the pretax income related to the
noncontrolling partners share of U.S. partnership earnings but excludes the related tax provision.
Noncontrolling interests in net income of subsidiaries reflects the portion of the results of
majority-owned operations which are applicable to the noncontrolling interest partners. Expense
related to noncontrolling interests totaled $35.1 million for the March 2010 quarter, $12.2 million
below the amount reported in the prior-year period primarily associated with a decline in
profitability levels in the M-I SWACO joint venture.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $440.5 million during the first quarter of 2010 and equaled
$547.8 million as of
March 31, 2010. During the first three months of 2010, the Company generated $53.0 million of cash
flows from operations, which compares to $197.8 million generated in the prior-year period. The
reduction in cash flows generated from operations was driven by the reduced year-on-year
profitability levels and increased investment in working capital, primarily accounts receivable.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the March 2010 period totaled $83.2 million, and
relates principally to investments in property, plant and equipment. When compared to the first
quarter of 2009, cash flows used in investing activities increased $66.3 million due to the $65.0
million of proceeds received in connection with the sale of the W-H fluid operations in the
prior-year period.
As a result of the more favorable industry environment, the Companys capital expenditure
expectation for fiscal 2010 has been increased by approximately 15 percent. The Company expects
that allocation of additional funds for capital expenditures
throughout the year is likely and will be
implemented in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement.
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $400.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, $260.9 million above the prior-year quarter. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company
used a portion of the cash received in the November 2009 equity offering to repay $370.1 million of
outstanding borrowings under various loan agreements and fund $29.8 million of common stock
dividends.
The Companys primary internal source of liquidity is cash flow generated from operations. Cash
flow generated from operations is primarily influenced by the level of worldwide drilling
activity, which affects profitability levels and working capital requirements. Capacity under
revolving credit agreements is also available, if necessary, to fund operating or investing
activities. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had no amounts drawn or letters of credit issued
under various U.S. revolving credit facilities, resulting in $1.4 billion of current capacity
available for operating or investing needs. The Company also has revolving credit facilities in
place outside of the United States, which are generally used to finance local operating needs. At
March 31, 2010, the Company had available borrowing capacity of $160 million under the non-U.S.
borrowing facilities.
The Companys external sources of liquidity include debt and equity financing in the public capital
markets, if needed. The Company carries an investment-grade credit rating with recognized rating
agencies, generally providing the Company with access to debt markets. The Companys overall
borrowing capacity is, in part, dependent on maintaining compliance with financial covenants under
the various credit agreements and is subject to the restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company was within the covenant compliance thresholds under its various
loan indentures, as amended, providing the ability to access available borrowing capacity.
Management believes internally generated cash flow combined with capacity available under existing
credit facilities will be sufficient to finance capital expenditures and working capital needs of
the existing operations for the foreseeable future.
25
Management continues to evaluate opportunities to acquire products and businesses complementary to
the Companys operations, subject to the restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement. In addition
to potential external acquisition candidates, if the Merger is not consummated, either we or our
M-I SWACO joint venture partner, Schlumberger, can offer to sell to the other party its entire
ownership interest in the joint venture in exchange for a cash purchase price specified by the
offering partner. If the initiating partners offer to sell is not accepted, such party is
obligated to purchase the other partys interest at the same valuation per interest. If we agree
to purchase Schlumbergers joint venture interest, whether pursuant to these provisions or
otherwise, we would need to fund the transaction. Our funding could include issuing equity,
resulting in dilution to our existing stockholders, obtaining additional debt, which may require
waivers of applicable debt covenants, or obtaining other financing, as well as using available cash
to fund the purchase. This financing and/or use of cash could impact our ability to fund working
capital requirements, make capital expenditures and investments or fund other general corporate
requirements, and could limit our ability to make future acquisitions. Should we instead not
purchase Schlumbergers interest, we would no longer have an interest in the joint venture.
The Company makes regular quarterly distributions under a dividend program. The current annual
payout under the program of approximately $120 million is expected to be funded with future cash
flows from operations and, if necessary, amounts available under existing credit facilities. The
level of future dividend payments will be at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors,
subject to the restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement, which permits regular quarterly
dividends in an amount up to $0.12 per share, and will depend upon the Companys financial
condition, earnings, cash flows, compliance with certain debt covenants and other relevant factors.
The Companys Board of Directors maintains a share repurchase program that allows for the
repurchase of up to 20 million shares of the Companys common stock, subject to regulatory issues,
market considerations and other relevant factors. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had 15.2
million shares remaining under the current authorization. Future repurchases under the program may
be executed from time to time, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and will
be funded with cash flows from operations or amounts available under existing credit facilities.
The share repurchase program has been suspended during the pendency of the Merger in order to
comply with the restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement.
Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
Subsequent to the announcement of the proposed Merger, five putative class action lawsuits were
commenced on behalf of stockholders of the Company against the Company and its directors and in
certain cases against Schlumberger and one of its affiliates, challenging the proposed transaction.
Four of the lawsuits were filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, which have been
consolidated into a single action in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas
(the Texas Action), and one lawsuit is pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the Delaware
Action, and collectively with the Texas Action, the Actions). The plaintiff in the Texas Action
has filed a First Amended Petition. The Actions variously allege that the Companys directors
breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, causing Smith to enter into the Merger
Agreement at an allegedly inadequate and unfair price and agreeing to transaction terms that
improperly inhibit alternative transactions. The Texas Action separately alleges that the Company
aided and abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties, and both Actions allege that
Schlumberger aided and abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints seek,
among other things, an injunction barring defendants from consummating the proposed transaction,
declaratory relief and attorneys fees. The parties in the Texas Action and Delaware Action have
agreed to an expedited discovery schedule and to the coordination of pleadings and discovery in
advance of any preliminary injunction hearing, which will be heard only in the Texas Action. On
April 19, 2010, the court in the Delaware Action approved the parties agreement concerning the
coordination of the Texas and Delaware actions and agreed to otherwise stay the Delaware
proceedings through any preliminary injunction hearing in Texas. The Company believes that the
lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend these lawsuits vigorously.
The Company is also a defendant in various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
26
Standby Letters of Credit
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, the Company is contingently
liable for performance under standby letters of credit and bid, performance and surety bonds.
Certain of these outstanding instruments guarantee payment to insurance companies with respect to
certain liability coverages of the Companys insurance captive. Excluding the impact of these
instruments, for which $19.1 million of related liabilities are reflected in the accompanying
consolidated condensed balance sheet, the Company was contingently liable for approximately $252
million of standby letters of credit and bid, performance and surety bonds at March 31, 2010.
Management does not expect any material amounts to be drawn on these instruments.
Insurance
The Company maintains insurance coverage for various aspects of its business and operations. The
Company has elected to retain a portion of losses that occur through the use of deductibles and
retentions under its insurance programs. Amounts in excess of the self-insured retention levels
are fully insured to limits believed appropriate for the Companys operations. Self-insurance
accruals are based on claims filed and an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. While
management believes that amounts accrued in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial
statements are adequate for expected liabilities arising from the Companys portion of losses,
estimates of these liabilities may change as circumstances develop.
Environmental
The Company routinely establishes and reviews the adequacy of reserves for estimated future
environmental clean-up costs for properties currently or previously operated by the Company. In
the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the
Companys consolidated condensed financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial
statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis, based on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. In its 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company has described the critical
accounting policies that require managements most significant judgments and estimates. There have
been no material changes in these critical accounting policies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting standards are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB). On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted a new accounting standard, which amends previous
guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIE). The standard modifies how an
enterprise determines the primary beneficiary that would consolidate the VIE from a quantitative
risks and rewards calculation to a qualitative approach. Such assessment is required to be
performed on a continuous basis and is influenced by, among other things, an enterprises ability
to direct the most significant activities that influence the VIEs operating performance. The
adoption of this accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
condensed financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance with respect to revenue recognition
for arrangements with multiple deliverables. This update will allow allocation of consideration
received for qualified separate deliverables based on estimated selling prices for both delivered
and undelivered items when vendor-specific or third-party evidence is not available. Additionally,
disclosure of the nature of multiple element arrangements, the general timing of their delivery,
and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required. The
Company is currently evaluating this update, which will be adopted for new revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011.
27
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk primarily associated with changes in interest rates and
foreign exchange rates and enters into various hedging transactions to mitigate these risks. The
Company does not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. During the
reporting period, no events or transactions have occurred which would materially change the
information disclosed in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our
principal executive and financial officers, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (Exchange Act)) as of March 31, 2010. Based upon that evaluation, our principal
executive and financial officers concluded that as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There has been no change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal controls
over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Subsequent to the announcement of the proposed Merger, five putative class action lawsuits were
commenced on behalf of stockholders of the Company against the Company and its directors and in
certain cases against Schlumberger and one of its affiliates, challenging the proposed transaction.
Four of the lawsuits were filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, which have been
consolidated into a single action in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas
(the Texas Action), and one lawsuit is pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the Delaware
Action, and collectively with the Texas Action, the Actions). The plaintiff in the Texas Action
has filed a First Amended Petition. The Actions variously allege that the Companys directors
breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, causing Smith to enter into the Merger
Agreement at an allegedly inadequate and unfair price and agreeing to transaction terms that
improperly inhibit alternative transactions. The Texas Action separately alleges that the Company
aided and abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties, and both Actions allege that
Schlumberger aided and abetted the directors breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaints seek,
among other things, an injunction barring defendants from consummating the proposed transaction,
declaratory relief and attorneys fees. The parties in the Texas Action and Delaware Action have
agreed to an expedited discovery schedule and to the coordination of pleadings and discovery in
advance of any preliminary injunction hearing, which will be heard only in the Texas Action. On
April 19, 2010, the court in the Delaware Action approved the parties agreement concerning the
coordination of the Texas and Delaware actions and agreed to otherwise stay the Delaware
proceedings through any preliminary injunction hearing in Texas. The Company believes that the
lawsuits are without merit and intends to defend these lawsuits vigorously.
The Company is also a defendant in various other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
28
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risk factors discussed below update the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I
of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Risks Related To Our Business
|
|
The significant deterioration in the global business environment and related factors could
adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. |
The deterioration in the global business environment has led to a significant reduction in
commodity prices from average levels reported in 2008, which has contributed to lower cash flow
generation for oil and natural gas exploration and production companies. In addition, the
reduction in the availability and increased cost of financing which began in the second half of
2008 had a significant impact on a number of our customers. These factors, if continued or
worsened, could contribute to a sustained or further decline in our customers spending levels. As
a result, we must manage our costs, including our workforce levels, to match the decline. A
continued reduction in the level of future investment or our inability to reduce our costs
sufficiently to match the material slowdown in drilling activity could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Moreover, if the business environment experiences a significant deterioration from current
levels, we may be required to record goodwill and/or other intangible asset impairment losses,
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and
our compliance with applicable debt covenants.
|
|
The financial and credit market environment may limit our ability to expand our business through
acquisitions and to fund necessary expenditures. |
The
global financial and credit market environment has increased the cost
of financing and at times has limited its availability. Any inability to access the credit and capital
markets could limit our ability to make significant business acquisitions and pursue business
opportunities. If the Merger is not consummated, either we or our M-I SWACO joint venture partner,
Schlumberger, can offer to sell to the other party its entire ownership interest in the joint
venture in exchange for a cash purchase price specified by the offering partner. If the initiating
partners offer to sell is not accepted, such party is obligated to purchase the other partys
interest at the same valuation per interest. If we agree to purchase Schlumbergers
joint venture interest, whether pursuant to these provisions or otherwise, we would need to
fund the transaction. Our funding could include issuing equity, resulting in dilution to our
existing stockholders, obtaining additional debt, which may require waivers of applicable debt
covenants, or obtaining other financing, as well as using available cash to fund the purchase.
This financing and/or use of cash could impact our ability to fund working capital requirements,
make capital expenditures and investments or fund other general corporate requirements, and could
limit our ability to make future acquisitions. Should we instead not purchase Schlumbergers
interest, we would no longer have an interest in the joint venture. The failure to pursue
significant acquisition opportunities, or the consequences of seeking waivers, issuing equity or
obtaining other financing, could have a material adverse effect on our future results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows.
|
|
We are dependent on the level of oil and natural gas exploration and development activities. |
Demand for our products and services is dependent upon the level of oil and natural gas
exploration and development activities. The level of worldwide oil and natural gas development
activities is primarily influenced by the price of oil and natural gas, as well as price
expectations. The current state of world economies could lead to further weakness in exploration
and production spending levels, further reducing demand for our products and services and adversely
impacting future results. In addition to oil and natural gas prices, the following factors impact
exploration and development activity and may lead to significant changes in worldwide activity
levels:
|
|
|
overall level of global economic growth and activity; |
|
|
|
|
actual and perceived changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
political stability and policies of oil-producing countries; |
|
|
|
|
finding and development costs of operators; |
|
|
|
|
decline and depletion rates for oil and natural gas wells; |
29
|
|
|
seasonal weather conditions that temporarily curtail drilling operations; and |
|
|
|
|
laws and regulations related to environmental or energy security matters, including those
addressing alternative energy sources and the risks of global climate change. |
Changes in any of these factors could adversely impact our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
|
|
A significant portion of our revenue is derived in markets outside of North America. |
We are a multinational oilfield service company and generate the majority of our
oilfield-related revenues in markets outside of North America. Changes in conditions within certain
countries that have historically experienced a high degree of political and/or economic instability
could adversely impact our operations in such countries and as a result our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows. Additional risks inherent in our non-North American business
activities include:
|
|
|
changes in political and economic conditions in the countries in which we operate,
including civil uprisings, riots and terrorist acts; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements affecting oil and natural gas exploration
and development activities; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the value of the U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on repatriation of earnings or expropriation of property without fair
compensation; |
|
|
|
|
governmental actions that result in the deprivation of contract or proprietary rights in
the countries in which we operate; and |
|
|
|
|
governmental sanctions. |
|
|
We operate in a highly technical and competitive environment. |
We operate in a highly competitive business environment. Accordingly, demand for our products
and services is largely dependent on our ability to provide leading-edge, technology-based
solutions that reduce the operators overall cost of developing energy assets and to commercialize
performance-driven new technology. If competitive or other market conditions impact our ability to
continue providing superior-performing product offerings, our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows could be adversely impacted.
|
|
Regulatory compliance costs and liabilities could adversely impact our earnings and cash available
for operations. |
We are exposed to a variety of federal, state, local and international laws and regulations
relating to matters such as the use of hazardous materials, health and safety, labor and
employment, import/export control, currency exchange, bribery, corruption and taxation, and the
environment, including laws and regulations governing air emissions, wastewater discharges and
waste management. These laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to
become more stringent over time. In the event the scope of these laws and regulations expand in
the future, the incremental cost of compliance could adversely impact our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows. For example, the adoption of more stringent laws and
regulations that curtailed either directly or indirectly the level of oil and natural gas
exploration and development activities could adversely affect our operations by limiting demand for
our products and services.
|
|
Our industry is experiencing more litigation involving claims of infringement of intellectual
property rights. |
Over the past years, the industry in which we operate has experienced increased litigation
related to the infringement of intellectual property rights. Although no material matters are
pending or threatened at this time, we, as well as certain of our competitors, have been named as
defendants in various intellectual property matters in the past. These types of claims are
typically costly to defend, involve the risk of monetary judgments that, in certain circumstances,
are subject to being enhanced and are often brought in venues that have proved to be favorable to
plaintiffs. If we are served with any intellectual property claims that we are unsuccessful in
defending, it could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
30
|
|
Our business operations in countries outside the United States are subject to a number of U.S.
federal laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and the Commerce
Department. |
Our business operations in countries outside the United States are subject to a number of
U.S. federal laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act (FCPA) as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control
(OFAC) and the Commerce Department. The FCPA is intended to prohibit bribery of foreign
officials or parties and requires public companies in the United States to keep books and records
that accurately and fairly reflect those companies transactions. OFAC and the Commerce Department
administer and enforce economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national
security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations and individuals. If we fail to
comply with these laws and regulations, we could be exposed to claims for damages, financial
penalties, reputational harm, and incarceration of our employees or restrictions on our operations.
We have received an administrative subpoena with respect to our historical business practices in
Iran and Sudan. We are conducting a review of our business activities involving Iran and Sudan, and
are actively pursuing the termination of all business activities in Iran and Sudan. While the
nature and scope of issues that may emerge from this review are yet to be determined, there is a
risk that we could identify violations of U.S. sanctions laws, which if pursued by regulatory
authorities, could result in administrative or criminal penalties which in certain circumstances
could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
|
|
Our business may be affected by market or regulatory responses to climate change. |
Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are the subject of a significant attention within
and outside the United States. Future environmental regulatory developments (such as restrictions,
caps, taxes, or other controls) could adversely influence the cost of and demand for oil and
natural gas. A reduction in demand for these commodities may result in a decline in exploration
and production spending by our customers, which in turn could adversely impact demand and pricing
for our products and services. Additionally, restrictions on emissions or other climate change
related mandates could result in significant increases in the cost of our goods and services.
There is no assurance that in response to escalating expenses, we could increase our prices to
customers sufficiently to mitigate the financial impact of such cost expansion. These factors,
individually or together, or other unforeseen impacts of climate change regulation could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Risks Related to the Pending Merger with Schlumberger
|
|
The exchange ratio for the Merger is fixed and will not be adjusted in the event of any change in
either our or Schlumbergers stock price. |
Upon the closing of the Merger, each share of our common stock will be converted into the
right to receive 0.6966 shares of Schlumberger common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional
shares. This exchange ratio was fixed in the Merger Agreement and will not be adjusted for changes
in the market price of either our common stock or Schlumberger common stock. Changes in the price
of Schlumberger common stock prior to the merger will affect the market value that a stockholder
may be entitled to receive on the date of the Merger. Stock price changes may result from a
variety of factors (many of which are beyond our or Schlumbergers control), including the
following factors:
|
|
|
changes in our and Schlumbergers respective business, operations and prospects; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market assessments of the business, operations and prospects of either
company; |
|
|
|
|
market assessments of the likelihood that the Merger will be completed, including related
considerations regarding regulatory approvals of the Merger; |
|
|
|
|
interest rates, general market, industry and economic conditions and other factors
generally affecting the price of our and Schlumbergers common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
federal, state and local legislation, governmental regulation and legal developments in
the businesses in which we and Schlumberger operate. |
The price of Schlumberger common stock at the closing of the Merger may vary from its price on
the date the Merger Agreement was executed, on the date of this report, and on the date of our
annual meeting to vote on the Merger. As a result, the market value represented by the exchange
ratio will also vary.
31
|
|
Because the date that the Merger is completed will be later than the date of our annual meeting,
at the time of our annual meeting, a stockholder will not know the exact market value of the
Schlumberger common stock that will be received upon completion of the Merger. |
If the price of Schlumberger common stock declines between the date of our annual meeting and
the effective time of the Merger, including for any of the reasons described above, a stockholder
will receive shares of Schlumberger common stock that have a market value upon completion of the
Merger that is less than the market value calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio upon the date
of our annual meeting. Therefore, while the number of shares of Schlumberger common stock to be
issued in the Merger is fixed, a stockholder cannot be sure of the market value of the Schlumberger
common stock to be received upon completion of the Merger or the market value of Schlumberger
common stock at any time after the completion of the Merger.
|
|
Our ability to complete the Merger is subject to stockholder approval, certain closing conditions
and the receipt of consents and approvals from government entities which may impose conditions
that could adversely affect us or cause the Merger to be abandoned. |
The Merger Agreement contains certain closing conditions including approval of the Merger by
Smith stockholders, the absence of injunctions or other legal restrictions and that no material
adverse effect shall have occurred to either company. In addition, we will be unable to complete
the merger until approvals are received from the United States Department of Justice, the European
Commission and various other governmental entities. We and Schlumberger have each recently
received a request for additional information and documentary material, often referred to as a
second request from the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.
Regulatory entities may impose certain requirements or obligations as conditions for their
approval. The Merger Agreement may require us and/or Schlumberger to accept conditions from these
regulators that could adversely impact the combined company. We can provide no assurance that we
will satisfy the various closing conditions and that the necessary approvals will be obtained or
that any required conditions will not materially adversely affect the combined company following
the Merger. In addition, we can provide no assurance that these conditions will not result in the
abandonment or delay of the Merger.
|
|
Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact us. |
If the Merger is not completed, our ongoing businesses and the market price of our common
stock may be adversely affected and we will be subject to several risks, including being required,
under certain circumstances, to pay Schlumberger a termination fee of $340 million; having to pay
certain costs relating to the Merger, and diverting the focus of management from pursuing other
opportunities that could be beneficial to us, in each case, without realizing any of the benefits
of having the Merger completed.
|
|
The pendency of the Merger could adversely affect us. |
In connection with the pending Merger, some of our customers may delay or defer purchasing
decisions, which could negatively impact our revenues, earnings and cash flows regardless of
whether the Merger is completed. Additionally, we have agreed in the Merger Agreement to refrain
from taking certain actions with respect to our business and financial affairs during the pendency
of the Merger, which restrictions could be in place for an extended period of time if completion of
the Merger is delayed and could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
|
The combined company could incur substantial expenses related to the integration of the Company
and Schlumberger. |
We expect that the combined company will incur substantial expenses in connection with
integrating our business, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems with those of
Schlumberger. There are a large number of systems that must be integrated, including information
management, purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, payroll and benefits, fixed asset
and lease administration systems and regulatory compliance. There are a number of factors beyond
the control of either party that could affect the total amount or the timing of all of the expected
integration expenses. Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are
difficult to estimate accurately at the present time. These expenses could, particularly in the
near term, exceed the savings that Schlumberger expects to achieve from the elimination of
duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings and revenue
enhancements related to the integration of the businesses following the completion of the Merger.
These integration expenses may result in the combined company taking significant charges against
earnings following the completion of the Merger.
32
|
|
Following the Merger, the combined company may be unable to successfully integrate our business
and Schlumbergers business and realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger. |
The Merger involves the combination of two companies which currently operate as independent
public companies. The combined company will be required to devote management attention and
resources to integrating its business practices and operations. Potential difficulties the combined
company may encounter in the integration process include the following:
|
|
|
the inability to successfully integrate our business into Schlumbergers business in a
manner that permits the combined company to achieve the cost savings and operating synergies
anticipated to result from the Merger, which would result in the anticipated benefits of the
Merger not being realized partly or wholly in the time frame currently anticipated or at
all; |
|
|
|
|
lost sales and customers as a result of certain customers of either of the two companies
deciding not to do business with the combined company, or deciding to decrease their amount
of business in order to reduce their reliance on a single company; |
|
|
|
|
integrating personnel from the two companies while maintaining focus on providing
consistent, high quality products and customer service; |
|
|
|
|
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses, delays or regulatory
conditions associated with the Merger; and |
|
|
|
|
performance shortfalls at one or both of the two companies as a result of the diversion
of managements attention caused by completing the Merger and integrating the companies
operations. |
In addition, we and Schlumberger have operated and, until the completion of the Merger, will
continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in
the diversion of each companys management attention, the disruption or interruption of, or the
loss of momentum in, each companys ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls,
procedures and policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships
with customers and employees or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger, or
could reduce the earnings or otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of the
combined company.
|
|
We may be unable to retain key employees during the pendency of the Merger. |
In connection with the pending Merger, our current and prospective employees may experience
uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company following the Merger, which may
materially adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel during the pendency of
the Merger. Key employees may depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty
of integration or a desire not to remain with the combined company following the Merger.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be able to retain key employees to the same
extent that we have been able to in the past.
|
|
Multiple lawsuits have been filed against us challenging the Merger, and an adverse ruling in any
such lawsuit may prevent the Merger from being completed. |
Subsequent to the announcement of the Merger, five putative class actions were commenced on
behalf of our stockholders against us and our directors, and in certain cases against Schlumberger
and one of its affiliates, challenging the Merger. One of the conditions to the closing of the
Merger is that no law, order, injunction, judgment, decree, ruling or other similar requirement
shall be in effect that prohibits the completion of the Merger. Accordingly, if any of the
plaintiffs is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the completion of the Merger, then
such injunction may prevent the Merger from becoming effective, or from becoming effective within
the expected timeframe.
33
|
|
The required regulatory approvals may not be obtained or may contain materially burdensome
conditions that could have an adverse effect on Schlumberger. |
Completion of the Merger is conditioned upon the receipt of certain governmental approvals,
including, without limitation, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, the issuance by the European Commission of a decision under Council
Regulation No. 4064/89 of the European Community declaring the Merger compatible with the common
market and the approval of the Merger by the antitrust regulators in other specified jurisdictions.
Although we and Schlumberger have agreed in the Merger Agreement to use our reasonable best
efforts to obtain the requisite governmental approvals, there can be no assurance that these
approvals will be obtained. In addition, the governmental authorities from which these approvals
are required may impose conditions on the completion of the Merger or require changes to the terms
of the Merger. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Schlumberger is required to agree to take
all actions demanded by an antitrust regulator in order to resolve any objections to the Merger
(including divestitures, hold-separate restrictions or other restrictions) if doing so would not
exceed a specified threshold, which is referred to as the detriment limit. The detriment limit
would be exceed if the required divestitures of hold-separate restrictions affect assets other than
(1) the W-H Energy Services business and corresponding Schlumberger operations and (2) other assets
accounting for Schlumberger or Smith revenues of not more than $190 million in 2009, excluding from
such calculation any W-H Energy Services operations and our Wilson business unit. If Schlumberger
agrees to undertake divestitures or comply with operating restrictions in order to obtain any
approvals required to complete the Merger, Schlumberger may be less able to realize anticipated
benefits of the Merger, and the business and results of operations of the combined company after
the Merger may be adversely affected.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Companys Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program that allows for the
purchase of up to 20 million shares of the Companys common stock, subject to regulatory issues,
market considerations and other relevant factors. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company
did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the program. The number of shares that may be
purchased under the program as of March 31, 2010 is 15,158,913. Prior to January 1, 2010, the
Company has repurchased 4.8 million shares at an average cost of $43.61 per share under the
program. The acquired shares have been added to the Companys treasury stock holdings. Certain
participants in the long-term incentive plans surrender shares of common stock in order to satisfy
tax-withholding obligations. These shares are not considered acquisitions under the Companys
share repurchase program. The share repurchase program has been suspended during the pendency of
the Merger in order to comply with the restrictions imposed by the Merger Agreement.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
34
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits designated with an * are filed, and with an ** are furnished, as an exhibit to this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. Exhibits designated with a + are identified as management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements. Exhibits previously filed as indicated below are incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 21, 2010, by and among Schlumberger
Limited (Schlumberger N.V.), Turnberry Merger Sub Inc., and Smith International, Inc. Filed
as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3, dated as of February 21, 2010, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of June 8,
2000, between Smith International, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as rights
agent. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101**
|
|
|
|
The following materials from Smith International, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets,
(iii) Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows,
(iv) Consolidated Condensed Statements of Stockholders
Equity and Comprehensive Income and (v) Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, tagged as
blocks of text. |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Registrant
|
|
Date: April 28, 2010 |
/s/ John Yearwood
|
|
|
John Yearwood |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 28, 2010 |
/s/ William Restrepo
|
|
|
William Restrepo |
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits designated with an * are filed, and with an ** are furnished, as an exhibit to this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. Exhibits designated with a + are identified as management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements. Exhibits previously filed as indicated below are incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 21, 2010, by and among Schlumberger
Limited (Schlumberger N.V.), Turnberry Merger Sub Inc., and Smith International, Inc. Filed
as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3, dated as of February 21, 2010, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of June 8,
2000, between Smith International, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as rights
agent. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101**
|
|
|
|
The following materials from Smith International, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Condensed Statements
of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets,
(iii) Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows,
(iv) Consolidated Condensed Statements of Stockholders
Equity and Comprehensive Income and (v) Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, tagged as
blocks of text. |
37