SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003
Commission file number 0-12370
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 95-3381440 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
14192 Franklin Avenue, Tustin, CA 92780
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
714-505-6483
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g):
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by checkmark if no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange A Rule 12b-2) Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing price of such stock, as reported by the NASDAQ national market on January 31, 2003 is $4,032,410.
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants common stock as of October 31, 2003 was 4,026,996.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual meeting of Stockholders to be held on December 11, 2003 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
SI Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (SI, SI Technologies or the Company) is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of high-performance industrial sensors, weighing and factory automation systems, and related products. Acquisitions over the past seven years have diversified the Companys revenue base and positioned SI as an integrator of technologies, products and companies that are enabling SI to become a leading global provider of devices, equipment and systems that handle, measure and inspect goods and materials. SI products are used throughout the world in a wide variety of industries, including aerospace, agriculture, aviation, food processing and packaging, forestry, manufacturing, mining, transportation/distribution and waste management.
Since 1996, the Company has been capitalizing on its technology and existing customer relationships through product and market expansion in selected segments of a $70 billion industrial measurement and automation industry.
The Company was incorporated in California on May 29, 1979 as Invention, Design, Engineering Associates, Inc. and was reincorporated in Delaware on April 20, 1983. In February 1996, the Company changed its name to SI Technologies, Inc. The name SI Technologies serves to preserve a loyal customer following in the Companys dynamic weighing systems business while at the same time representing the broader technologies and business interests of the Company.
The Companys principal executive offices and headquarters are located at 14192 Franklin Avenue, Tustin, California. Headquarters communication information is as follows: telephone, 714-505-6483, fax, 714-573-2034, e-mail address, sitech@sitechnologies.com, Web site, www.sitechnologies.com.
Business Strategy
The Company aspires to become a leading provider of manufactured devices, equipment, engineered systems and services used in the niche industrial markets in which it operates and to expand its markets through product development and acquisition of complementary products as an industry integrator in the $70 billion industrial measurement and automation industry.
Operations Integration
SI believes its operations integration strategy will allow it to achieve greater efficiencies in acquired companies through elimination of redundant costs and by leveraging economies of scale in manufacturing operations, and procurement of materials and services.
Since 1996, SI Technologies has completed five acquisitions.
Acquired Company |
Date Acquired |
Primary Products |
Industries Served | |||
Evergreen Weigh, Inc. |
1996 | Dynamic & Static Weighing Systems | Aviation, mining, transportation | |||
AeroGo, Inc. |
1997 | Factory Automation Equipment & Systems |
Aviation/aerospace, automotive, manufacturing, general industry | |||
NV Technology, Inc. |
1998 | Sensors | General industry, food, transportation | |||
Allegany Technology, Inc. |
1998 | Sensors & Dynamic Weighing Systems | Aerospace, transportation, general industry | |||
Revere Transducers, Inc. |
1998 | Sensors & Static Weighing Equipment | Aviation/aerospace, food, general industry |
Further acquisition detail may be found under the Acquisition History section.
2
On-going Acquisition/Merger Activities
In pursuit of the Companys growth strategy, management is continuously evaluating acquisition/merger opportunities with numerous companies. Companies of interest are leading manufacturers, distributors and service providers who compete with technology advantage, are generating internal growth, and show potential for strong synergy with the Companys technology, manufacturing operations and marketing and sales organization.
Products and Services
Industrial Measurement
The Companys industrial sensor and control products consist of a wide range of NTEP and OIML approved, EX, Factory Mutual and IP rated load cells, transducers, translators and sensors. These devices, representing a core SI technology, are electromechanical components that convert a physical force to an electrical signal. When matched with microprocessor-controlled digital electronics, they measure forces such as pressure, weight, mass and torque. Commercially, the products are used for measurement, inspection and control. SI sensor and control products are principally used in electronic weighing equipment; batching, blending, mixing, fill-by-weight and product inspection operations and, machinery operation and control systems. SI controls/instrumentation is normally designed as an integral part of a complete weighing system. In recent years, SI instrumentation has been expanded to provide users with the ability to acquire, record in memory and download to management information systems operational information other than weight information. In this expanded capacity, SI instrumentation becomes a critical link between operations and management information systems.
SI designs and manufactures dynamic and static electronic weighing equipment and systems for use in a wide array of industrial applications. As a result of the uniqueness of the Companys combined sensor, weighing and automation system technologies, SI is one of few manufacturers in the industry who design and manufacture all three of the primary components of an electronic scale. These components are the load-handling structure, sensors and instrumentation. Many manufacturers of conventional scale systems manufacture only load-handling structures, outsourcing to industry suppliers their sensor and instrumentation requirements. The Company utilizes its expertise and manufacturing know-how in each of these critical components to competitive advantage and believes our broad expertise can be exploited through our acquisition/integration growth strategy.
Dynamic weighing systems are installed on transportation vehicles, material-handling equipment and in manufacturing process systems for weight measurement of goods and materials. Weight information generated by these systems has broad application including loading, transporting and delivery payload management; manufacturing process, inventory and quality control; and operations automation. Key products marketed under the AirScale, Allegany, Checkmate, Evergreen Weigh, Structural Instrumentation, RouteMan, SmartPin, The Logger, Trojan, and Tuffer trade names are dynamic weigh-in-motion and mobile on-board vehicle and material-handling equipment scales, pallet weighers, crane scales and engineered system scales. SI systems are available as standard products for use with most major original equipment manufacturer (OEM) trucks, trailers, forklifts, loaders, cranes and lifting devices. Products are marketed predominately to the agriculture, construction, forestry, foundry, freight, manufacturing, mining, steel, transportation and waste management industries.
Depending on application, specific economic benefit is derived from reduced overweight vehicle fines and delays; reduced time loading, checkweighing and adjusting loads to maximum legal limits; reduced mileage and driving time to checkweighing locations such as commercial in-ground truck scales; immediate measurement and recording of pick-up and delivery weights; reduced equipment abuse, maintenance downtime and expense; and higher capital equipment capacity utilization. Additionally, the weight information produced by these systems is often the critical measurement in controlling, batching, blending and mixing operations in the manufacture of materials.
3
All systems include force measurement sensors and microprocessor-based electronic instrumentation. The instrumentation supplies power to the sensors, provides all operator interface and controls, processes sensor electronic signals to determine weights, and displays and records in memory weight information and other inputs from the system and/or the operator. Force measurement sensors employing electronic strain gage technology measure force values. The electrical resistance of force measurement sensors changes proportionally to the force applied; thus the return signal to the meter varies by load or force.
The Companys static weighing system product line consists of scales designed for numerous industrial and aviation weighing applications. Key products marketed under the trade names Air Guardian, Jet Weigh, Lodec, MTSERIES, Road Guardian, and Road Runner are permanent and portable axle scales, wheel-load weighers, canister load cell systems and heavy-capacity platform scales. Much like dynamic weighing systems, the static weighing systems have broad industrial application. Key markets in which these products enjoy significant market share include aggregate, aviation, construction, freight terminals, land remediation, mining and weight enforcement. Static weighing systems utilize the same technology as dynamic weighing systems; however, they are designed to weigh loads in a static or stationary mode.
Industrial Automation
SIs industrial automation products consist of load handling, moving and positioning equipment and systems. These products often utilize highly specialized air-bearing movement systems to move loads of any weight efficiently and with extreme precision. Air bearings are air-cushion devices that are used to float heavy loads on a thin film of air. Additionally, the Company manufactures systems utilizing water bearings for use in large outdoor applications where water is used as the flotation medium rather than air. These products, marketed under the trade names AeroCaster, AeroGo, AeroPallets, AeroPlanks and AirShuttle are the world leaders in practical and efficient methods of movement, transfer, location, rotation and alignment of materials and products weighing from several hundred pounds to more than 6,000 tons.
The Companys industrial automation product line comprises two distinct categories. The first is a standard product line of rugged, industrial, off-the-shelf air-cushion devices that allow a single person to easily and safely move loads weighing from a few hundred pounds to many tons. Standard products routinely move manufacturing fixtures, printing press bulky paper rolls, jet engines, and other heavy loads. The other category of the product line consists of engineered products. Engineered products and specialized systems designed and manufactured by the Company in recent years are currently moving 100,000-pound dies, launching ships, moving 4,500-ton stadium sections, transporting aerospace booster rockets and moving large assemblies in and out of assembly line operations in numerous heavy equipment manufacturing facilities.
Additional examples of engineered products include: automated guided vehicle systems, transporters, assembly line turntable systems, precision handling and positioning fixtures, quick die/mold changing carts, caisson manufacturing and moving systems, and aircraft inspection turntables.
SI industrial automation products commonly represent significant economic benefit in comparison to conventional material handling equipment through lower capital investment in manufacturing site construction, preparation and system installation, and greater operating efficiencies based on system versatility (not limited to following rails or tracks, as typically required with cranes and conveyors). These systems often represent the most viable means for handling extreme material handling applications involving very heavy loads, precision movement and positioning, and high efficiency assembly line automation.
4
Marketing and Sales
The Companys products are marketed throughout the world primarily through 300 distributors and manufacturer representatives, each operating in a specific trade area and serving industrial customers, engineering firms and various government agencies. In addition to headquarters marketing and sales personnel, and subsidiary business unit marketing and sales operations, the Company maintains North American regional sales offices in California, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia, Canada; and European regional sales offices in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Company regional sales personnel assist distributors and representatives, make direct sales calls on potential customers in areas not covered by distribution, and support the Companys direct major accounts.
The Company generates leads through a full complement of marketing practices, including advertisement in industry publications, direct-mail advertising, trade show participation and telemarketing. Headquarters and subsidiary personnel initiate the Companys sales process on all inquiries by providing the inquirer with information on Company products and services and qualifying the lead. After qualification, inquiries are either maintained in sales for follow-up by Company sales personnel and distribution, or dispatched to engineering for design, cost estimating and preparation of price quotations or bid packages.
Due to the Companys mix of standard off-the-shelf products and custom-engineered products, the time period between initial inquiry, purchase order receipt and shipment varies widely. Standard product orders are normally shipped within one to three days of purchase order receipt at published prices and with trade terms of FOB factory and 30 days net. Engineered products and projects are subject to specific contract terms negotiated between the Company and customer. Typically, contract terms provide for progress payments, provision for change orders and, on longer-term projects, provision for inflation- based price adjustment. On certain projects, the Company provides complete site preparation, system installation, start-up and customer training services. In this capacity, from time to time, the Company serves as a contractor on a time and material basis. The Companys business is not seasonal in nature.
Market Conditions and Competition
Market Conditions
Worldwide capital expenditures for industrial measurement and automation equipment and systems have averaged about $70 billion in recent years, with domestic spending accounting for approximately 30% of the total. Overall industry growth normally approximates inflation. Over the past eighteen months the Company believes the market and specifically key market sectors in which it does business has contracted due to the global manufacturing recession, which began in calendar year 2000. Beyond the current economic situation, the Company believes its unique products, diversity of markets and worldwide geographic presence present significant opportunities for internal growth within the industry.
Product uniqueness (niche products) is a competitive advantage for SI. Manufacturers of conventional mature products competing for market share with non-differentiated products normally compete primarily on product price and availability. SIs unique products such as dynamic weighing and air-bearing load-handling and factory automation systems frequently compete within the industry as substitute products or as an alternative means for meeting the customers needs. As a result of this high level of product differentiation and the application versatility of SIs unique products, the Company believes demand for SI products is more elastic than demand for conventional products within the industry.
Market diversity is a growing competitive advantage for SI. Over the past few years, SI has been redirecting its focus to new markets in an effort to mitigate a sharp capital spending downturn in the Companys traditionally strong forestry and waste management markets. Since the 1996 acquisition of Evergreen Weigh cross-selling of products and integration of Company sales organizations have steadily increased market share in several markets including, aggregate, aviation, and construction industries. With the acquisition of AeroGo in fiscal 1997, and the acquisitions of NV Technology, Allegany Technology and Revere Transducers in fiscal 1998, the Company has
5
further expanded its market diversity and potential for revenue synergies. The Company intends to capitalize on its growing market diversity, worldwide presence and cross-selling opportunities with an expanding product line to create internal growth.
SI maintains inventories of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods. To supply products with competitive availability, the Company carries approximately 47% of inventory in finished goods. While the Company manufacturers the majority of its value-added components, certain components, manufacturing processes and sub-assemblies are outsourced. Outsourced items are normally purchased on fixed price contracts on a just-in-time basis. Should the need arise, the Company believes that any supplier and/or subcontractor could be replaced without significant disruption to its business.
Competition
Competition in the industrial measurement and automation equipment and system industry is extremely fragmented with approximately 6,000 manufacturers and a greater number of distributors and service companies. To the Companys knowledge, there are no competitors with the same product mix as SI. Direct competitors (competing head-to-head with similar products) normally compete on a single product line and are smaller and may have less financial resources than SI. General industry-wide competitors (competing with alternative conventional products) range from very small, local companies to large, international companies with greater financial resources than SI.
In the dynamic and static weighing systems product line, direct competitors are all smaller, privately held companies. Occasionally and on specific applications, the weighing systems product line competes as an alternative product with larger companies that manufacture conventional, industrial weighing systems. These companies include Cardinal Scale Manufacturing Company, Fairbanks Scale Company, Mettler-Toledo Holding, Inc. and Weigh-Tronix, Inc. Competition among larger manufacturers of conventional weighing systems, due to lack of product differentiation, is principally based on price, local dealer trade-area presence and relationships, and product availability.
Competition in the industrial sensor and control product line varies widely depending on customer type and application. Industry standard sensors sold directly to large industrial scale manufacturers compete primarily on price, quality and service. Standard and custom sensors sold to OEMs of other types of products and equipment, and to user customers in process industries, primarily compete on the suppliers ability to provide engineering expertise and assistance, quality, and on-going customer support and service. Competitors range from small, local companies to large, international companies.
Competition in load handling and factory automation products is similar to weighing system products. In the air and water bearing product line, all competitors are smaller, privately held companies which may have less financial resources than the Company. Direct competitors include Airfloat, Hovair, and Aircaster. In custom-engineered products and projects, the Company normally competes as a substitute or alternative product versus conventional material-handling equipment manufactured by companies ranging in size from much smaller to significantly larger than the Company.
International markets vary widely in competitive issues. In some countries, price competition is more intense than in North America, while in others prior relationships and product quality receive more customer emphasis than do marginal pricing differentials, thus price competition is less intensive. As a result of product uniqueness, innovative design solutions, quality of product and dependability, SI products and services are frequently sold in situations where the Company is not the low bidder.
Significant Customers
Historically the Companys primary customers have been transportation, agriculture, forestry, manufacturing, waste management and general industrial companies. Over the past few years, as a result of the
6
Companys growth strategy, the customer base has expanded to include the aviation/aerospace, automotive, food processing, construction and maritime industries. Significant customers in recent years include Boeing, Caterpillar, Carrier, Chrysler, Ford, Hyundai, Mettler-Toledo, Lockheed, Michelin, Mitsubishi, NASA, Siemens, and Thiokol.
While a significant portion of the Companys annual revenues represent repeat business from its customers, no individual customer represents 10% or more of the Companys revenues.
Acquisition History
Acquisition of Evergreen Weigh, Inc.
In April 1996, the Company acquired Evergreen Weigh, Inc. (Evergreen), a Washington corporation. Evergreen is a manufacturer of dynamic and static weighing systems. Evergreens primary products include weigh-in-motion on-board scales for material-handling equipment, axle scales and wheel-load weighers. Key markets served by Evergreen products include the aviation, heavy construction, mining, quarry and transportation industries. The acquisition of Evergreen expanded the Companys product line and increased the number of markets in which the Company sells products. SI and Evergreen sales organizations merged into one integrated sales organization shortly after the acquisition.
Acquisition of AeroGo, Inc.
In July 1997 the Company acquired AeroGo, Inc., a Washington corporation. AeroGo is a world leader in the design and manufacture of load-handling, moving, positioning and factory automation equipment and systems. AeroGo products, utilizing both standard and highly specialized air bearing movement systems, are marketed chiefly to aviation/aerospace, automotive, construction, manufacturing, maritime and general industry. AeroGos factory automation expertise lies in the design and manufacturing of heavy load moving equipment, die carts, automated guided vehicle systems, transport skates, sideloaders, step conveyors and flexible manufacturing systems. The acquisition of AeroGo provided the Company with an entrance to the industrial automation industry.
Acquisition of NV Technology, Inc.
In February 1998, the Company acquired NV Technology, Inc. (NV), a Nevada corporation. The transaction, which was a tax-free merger, was accounted for as a pooling-of-interest. NV is a manufacturer of high-performance, stainless steel load cells and sensors. The addition of NVs National Institute of Science & Technology (NIST) certified products expanded the Companys business in legal-for-trade, weighing and process control applications.
Acquisition of Allegany Technology, Inc.
In July 1998, the Company acquired Allegany Technology, Inc. (Allegany), a Delaware corporation. Allegany is a leading designer and manufacturer of specialty load cells and sensors, industrial crane, and lift truck scales, along with billet weighing systems. Alleganys unique billet weighing systems increase productivity and profitability in the steel and heavy metals industries. Other major markets for Allegany products include aerospace, distribution, manufacturing, transportation and warehousing. Allegany products expanded the Companys strong position as a manufacturer of weighing products for niche markets.
Acquisition of Revere Transducers
In July 1998, the Company acquired Revere Transducers, Inc. and Revere Transducers Europe B.V. (Revere) from Harnischfeger Industries (NYSE-HPH). Revere is headquartered in Tustin, California, with
7
operations in Tustin and Breda, the Netherlands. Revere is one of the four largest manufacturers of electronic weighing load cells, sensors and related devices in the industry, with worldwide market share estimated at 8%. In addition to a highly recognized brand name, the acquisition of Revere brought the Company new technology and manufacturing capability in the design and manufacture of proprietary strain gages and a manufacturing facility and marketing organization in Europe.
Restructuring Plan
In the third quarter of 2001, the Company announced a Restructuring Plan to address a significant decline in sales brought about by the then nine-month old global manufacturing recession and to position the Company for improved profitability in the future. The plan announced was comprised of the three key components. First, was the consolidation of the SI/Allegany business unit and Revere Transducers, resulting in the closing of operations in Cumberland, Maryland. Second, the plan called for development of offshore manufacturing sources to reduce costs on certain high-volume, highly competitive load cells and sensors. The third component of the plan was for a downsizing of the Companys Tustin, California, headquarters and manufacturing facility to a more appropriately sized facility in the same general area. In recognition of the expenses associated with this restructuring, the Company recorded a $3,844,000 charge in fiscal 2001 to cover expenses related to implementation of the plan and costs associated with elimination of fixed assets and employee severance. Key cost components of the plan include: (1) reduction of manufacturing capacity by abandoning and/or downsizing facilities, (2) disposing of redundant assets, (3) termination of approximately 50 employees, and (4) outsourcing a significant portion of the combined operations higher volume products.
The Company has been unable to sublet the Maryland facility. An additional restructuring charge of $486,000 was recorded in 2003 representing the balance of lease payments for the facility. The Company will continue to actively market it, however at this time, it is uncertain if a suitable tenant can be found within the lease period. See additional discussion in Item 7.
Goodwill Impairment
As a result of the evaluation of its Allegany Technology subsidiary in connection with the restructuring plan in 2001 noted above, the Company estimated the discounted future cash flows of the continuing products, and determined that almost 40% of the remaining goodwill associated with the acquisition of companies previously incorporated into the Allegany Technology operation has been impaired. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of, a $2,000,000 charge for goodwill impairment was recorded in operating expenses for the quarter ended April 30, 2001.
Backlog
At July 31, 2003, the Companys backlog was $3,093,000, compared with $4,286,000 on July 31, 2002. The Companys backlog consists of written orders and commitments believed to be firm, approximately 95% of which is shippable in fiscal 2004. Purchase orders and contracts for products and services are from time to time modified and/or canceled by mutual consent between the Company and the customer. Therefore, the backlog on any specific date may not be indicative of the Companys future performance.
Employees
At July 31, 2003, the Company employed 240 full time employees.
Sources of Supply
The materials and components used by the Company to manufacture its products are available from a variety of sources. The Company believes that it is not dependent at this time on any particular supplier for either its materials or components and has experienced no difficulty in obtaining supplies.
8
Patents and Trademarks
The Company holds numerous patents on various force measurement devices and weighing system design applications. The patents have expiration dates ranging from 2003 to 2016. The Company also has patent license agreements to build force measurement devices under patents held by others. The license agreements are fully paid up and irrevocable for the lifetime of these patents. The Company has no reason to believe its patents are not valid. However, if the patents were successfully contested, management does not believe it would have a material adverse impact on the Company.
Financial Information about Foreign Operations
Foreign Operations
Included in the consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2003 are the identifiable assets of the Companys subsidiary, Revere Transducers Europe B.V., which total approximately $4,327,000. The Company acquired Revere Transducers Europe, located in the Netherlands, at July 1, 1998.
The Company derives approximately 59% of its revenues from customers within the United States. Approximately 30% come from sales to customers in 16 different countries in Europe. The balance of sales are to Canada, Mexico and Latin America. Sales outside the United States are primarily to developed countries.
For additional information regarding foreign assets and operations, see Note K to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
9
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Location |
Segment |
Utilization |
Square Footage |
Leased or Owned |
Lease Termination | |||||
UNITED STATES |
||||||||||
Tustin, CA |
Industrial Measurement | Corporate offices, headquarters and U.S. operations for Revere Transducers and SI/Allegany | 93,000 | Leased | September 2004 | |||||
Seattle, WA |
Industrial Automation | Offices and operations for AeroGo, Inc. | 55,326 | Leased | April 2004 | |||||
Cumberland, MD |
Industrial Measurement | Discontinued use as operations for SI/Allegany. Partial use as East Coast Sales and Service Center | 33,000 | Leased | May 2006 | |||||
Cumberland, MD |
Industrial Measurement | Aircraft hanger | 4,200 | Owned | ||||||
INTERNATIONAL |
||||||||||
Breda, the Netherlands |
Industrial Measurement | European operations for Revere Transducers | 22,000 | Leased | June 2007 | |||||
Kelowna, B.C., Canada |
Industrial Measurement | Canadian Sales & Service Center | 3,000 | Leased | May 2006 |
The Company believes that its properties have been adequately maintained, are in generally good condition and are suitable for the Companys business as presently conducted. The Company believes its existing facilities provide sufficient production capacity for its present needs and for its anticipated needs in the foreseeable future. The Company also believes that upon the expiration of its current leases, it either will be able to secure renewal terms or enter into leases for alternative locations at market terms. The Company has readied the Maryland facility for sublet, and is currently actively marketing it, however due to local market conditions, the Company can not make any assurances that the facility will be sublet.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is engaged in various legal actions as of July 31, 2003. In the opinion of management, based upon the advice of counsel, the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of Security Holders during the quarter ended July 31, 2003.
10
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
As of October 31, 2003, there were 199 shareholders of record of the Companys Common Stock. Management believes this represents approximately 600 beneficial owners of SI common stock. SIs common stock is traded on the over-the-counter market on the NASDAQ system under the symbol SISI. The Company has not declared nor paid any dividends since its inception. The following chart describes the price range of Common Shares of SI, as quoted by NASDAQ as the last closing price, by quarter for fiscal 2003 and 2002:
Price Range of Common Shares
2003 |
2002 | |||||||
High |
Low |
High |
Low | |||||
1st Quarter |
1.55 | .50 | 1.88 | .90 | ||||
2nd Quarter |
2.28 | 1.05 | 3.40 | 1.00 | ||||
3rd Quarter |
2.07 | 1.45 | 1.88 | 1.15 | ||||
4th Quarter |
3.79 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 1.04 |
Dividend Policy
The Company has never declared nor paid cash dividends on the Common Stock. The Company intends to retain all future earnings for reinvestment in its business and does not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, the Company is prohibited from declaring and/or paying cash dividends on its capital stock under the terms of certain indebtedness.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following tables summarize information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable stock options:
Plan Category |
(a) Number of securities |
(b) Weighted-average exercise |
(c) Number of securities remaining | |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
682,500 | $2.49 | 17,500 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
168,824 | $2.50 | None | |||
TOTAL |
851,324 | $2.49 | 17,500 |
11
On April 22, 2003, the Company sold an aggregate of 281,374 shares of the Companys common stock (the Common Stock) to two accredited investors, Ralph E. Crump (Chairman of the Board, Treasurer, and Director of the Company) and his wife, Marjorie Crump, for a total sale price of $500,000. The sale was made in reliance upon the private placement exemption contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D. In connection with the offering the Company also issued a five-year warrant to purchase 56,275 shares of Common Stock to Ralph E. Crump and five-year warrant to purchase 56,275 shares of Common Stock to Marjorie Crump. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.50 per share. Both Ralph E. Crump and Marjorie Crump have signed an agreement with the Company agreeing not to exercise these warrants, purchase any additional shares of common stock or obtain any benefit associated with holding the Common Stock of the warrants until shareholder approval of this sale is obtained at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
In June 2003, the Company sold an aggregate of 140,687 shares of Common Stock to 4 additional unaffiliated accredited investors, for a total sale price of $250,000. The sale was made in reliance upon the private placement exemption contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D. In connection with the offering the Company also issued a five-year warrants to purchase 56,275 shares of Common Stock to these investors. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.50 per share
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year ended July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
|||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 33,047,000 | $ | 32,613,000 | $ | 36,291,000 | $ | 41,329,000 | $ | 44,689,000 | |||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
1,197,000 | 1,673,000 | (7,128,000 | ) | 351,000 | (230,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share basic |
.33 | .47 | (2.00 | ) | .10 | (.07 | ) | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share diluted |
.32 | .47 | (2.00 | ) | .09 | (.07 | ) | ||||||||||
Total assets |
26,943,000 | 25,782,000 | 25,910,000 | 33,018,000 | 37,668,000 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
3,366,000 | 4,039,000 | | 10,809,000 | 11,418,000 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term obligations |
408,000 | 360,000 | 569,000 | 976,000 | 1,423,000 |
12
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
As an aid to understanding the Companys operating results, the following table indicates the percentage of revenues that each income statement item represents and the percentage increase or decrease in such items for the years indicated. Since 1996, the Company has acquired five businesses.
Total SI Technologies
Year ended July 31, |
Percent Increase/(Decrease) |
||||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2003 vs. 2002 |
2002 vs. 2001 |
|||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 1.3 | % | (10.1 | )% | |||||
Cost of sales |
65.1 | 64.1 | 67.1 | 2.9 | (14.2 | ) | |||||||||
Gross profit |
34.9 | 35.9 | 32.9 | (1.5 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
25.8 | 24.6 | 24.7 | 6.4 | (10.6 | ) | |||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
4.7 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 12.8 | (14.4 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
-0- | 1.1 | 1.2 | (100.0 | ) | (14.3 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
1.6 | -0- | 10.6 | 100.0 | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment loss |
-0- | -0- | 5.5 | -0- | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||
Operating expenses |
32.1 | 30.0 | 46.4 | 8.4 | (42.0 | ) | |||||||||
Operating profit |
2.8 | 5.9 | (13.5 | ) | (51.5 | ) | 139.5 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(2.9 | ) | (2.8 | ) | (4.3 | ) | 8.0 | (42.2 | ) | ||||||
Other income |
0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 62.8 | 754.5 | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income tax expense |
0.4 | 3.4 | (17.8 | ) | (89.5 | ) | 117.5 | ||||||||
Income tax (expense) benefit |
3.2 | 1.7 | (1.8 | ) | 99.6 | 181.6 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
3.6 | 5.1 | (19.6 | ) | (29.5 | ) | 123.5 | ||||||||
Industrial Measurement
Year ended July 31, |
Percent Increase/(Decrease) |
||||||||||||||
2002 |
2002 |
2001 |
2003 vs. 2002 |
2002 vs. 2001 |
|||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 4.4 | % | (10.2 | )% | |||||
Cost of sales |
67.0 | 66.2 | 70.7 | 5.6 | (15.8 | ) | |||||||||
Gross profit |
33.0 | 33.8 | 29.3 | (2.0 | ) | 3.4 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
24.1 | 22.0 | 22.9 | 14.3 | (13.9 | ) | |||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
5.0 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 12.8 | (11.9 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
-0- | .7 | .9 | (95.1 | ) | (24.0 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
1.8 | -0- | 13.6 | 100.0 | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment loss |
-0- | -0- | 7.1 | -0- | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||
Operating expenses |
30.9 | 27.3 | 49.2 | 18.1 | (50.0 | ) | |||||||||
Operating profit |
2.1 | 6.5 | (19.9 | ) | (66.4 | ) | (129.1 | ) |
13
Industrial Automation
Year ended July 31, |
Percent Increase/ |
||||||||||||||
2002 |
2002 |
2001 |
2003 vs. 2002 |
2002 vs. 2001 |
|||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | (9.5 | )% | (9.9 | )% | |||||
Cost of sales |
57.2 | 56.4 | 54.3 | (8.2 | ) | (6.5 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit |
42.8 | 43.6 | 45.7 | (11.1 | ) | (14.1 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
32.0 | 33.8 | 31.1 | (11.7 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
4.7 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 12.7 | (14.4 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
-0- | 2.4 | 2.2 | (100.0 | ) | (0.0 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
36.7 | 39.3 | 36.9 | (15.3 | ) | (4.3 | ) | ||||||||
Operating profit |
6.1 | 4.3 | 8.7 | 27.1 | (55.7 | ) |
NET SALES
Net sales for the year ended July 31, 2003 increased to $33,047,000 or 1.3% from $32,613,000 for the year ended July 31, 2002. The increase in sales in industrial measurement products is primarily attributable to favorable exchange rates from Euros to the dollar. Sales of industrial automation products decreased $682,000 or 9.5%, due to decreased volume demand for these products resulting from lower capital equipment spending globally.
Net sales for the year ended July 31, 2002 declined to $32,613,000 or 10.1% from $36,291,000 for the year ended July 31, 2001. The decrease in sales was primarily attributable to continuation of the global manufacturing recessions impact on capital equipment markets. Following a sales decline of 7-16% year-over-year in the first three quarters of 2002, the fourth quarter sales were comparable to 2001. Sales of industrial automation products decreased $796,000 or 9.9%.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit for the year ended July 31, 2003 decreased $180,000 or 1.5% to $11,539,000 from $11,719,000 for the year ended July 31, 2002. The decrease in gross profit was primarily attributable to continued downward price pressure in many of the Company products, and a shift to lower margin products during the second half of the year as product mix continued to shift between scale components and complete scale systems. Traditionally, the Companys complete scale system products earn substantially higher gross profit than the load cell or scale components product line.
Gross profit for the year ended July 31, 2002 decreased $230,000 or 1.9% to $11,719,000 from $11,949,000 for the year ended July 31, 2001. The decrease in gross profit was primarily attributable to lower sales volume, however, the contribution of the benefit of outsourcing products to lower cost producers resulted in a significant improvement in the gross margin percentage. The corresponding gross margins for the periods were 35.9% and 32.9%, respectively. The year-over-year increase in gross margin was the result of the consolidation of the Companys operations and placing into effect the restructuring.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended July 31, 2003 and 2002 were $8,537,000 and $8,023,000 respectively. The increase of $514,000 or 6.4%, was the result the expansion of the Companys marketing efforts including staff additions of $418,000. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were 25.8% in 2003 as compared to 24.6% in 2002. Selling, general and administrative
14
expenses for industrial automation decreased by $285,000 or 11.7% as a result of lower sales activity and reductions of administrative costs where practical.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended July 31, 2002 and 2001 were $8,023,000 and $8,971,000, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were 24.6% in 2002 as compared to 24.7% in 2001. The decrease in total expenditures was the result of consolidating the Companys sales, administrative and engineering functions, resulting in a $561,000 reduction in personnel costs.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING EXPENSES
Research, development and engineering expenses for the years ended July 31, 2003 and 2002 were $1,565,000 and $1,388,000, respectively. The increase of $177,000 or 12.8% represents salaries for engineering support of manufacturing. The Companys expenditures are primarily for sales, manufacturing and customer support and development of product enhancements.
Research, development and engineering expenses for the years ended July 31, 2002 and 2001 were $1,388,000 and $1,621,000, respectively. This is a decrease of $233,000 or 14.4%, attributable primarily to a reduction in personnel costs of approximately $100,000. The decrease was also attributable to the business unit combinations and facility consolidation implemented during the year.
AMORTIZATION EXPENSES
In 2003, amortization of goodwill was discontinued when the Company changed the treatment of amortization of goodwill to comply with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
Intangible amortization expenses amounted to $365,000 in 2002 as compared to $426,000 in 2001, and were lower due to the impairment in the carrying value of the unamortized goodwill recorded during the 2001 restructuring.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME
Interest expense in 2003 was $976,000 in comparison to $904,000 in 2002. A larger line of credit borrowings accounted for the increase in interest expense as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, while interest rates remained relatively stable. Other income was $153,000 in 2003 as compared to $94,000 in 2002.
Interest expense for 2002 decreased $660,000 or 42.2% from $1,564,000 in 2001 to $904,000 in 2002. This decrease was directly attributable to lower interest rates during the current year in comparison to the prior year and a reduction of overall debt of $1,027,000.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In the third quarter of 2001, the Company announced a Restructuring Plan to address a significant decline in sales brought about by the then nine-month old global manufacturing recession and to position the Company for improved profitability in the future. The plan announced was comprised of the three key components. First, was the consolidation of the SI/Allegany business unit and Revere Transducers, resulting in the closing of operations in Cumberland, Maryland. Second, the plan called for development of offshore manufacturing sources to reduce costs on certain high-volume, highly competitive load cells and sensors. The third component of the plan was for a downsizing of the Companys Tustin, California, headquarters and manufacturing facility to a more appropriately sized facility in the same general area. In recognition of the expenses associated with this restructuring, the Company recorded a $3,844,000 charge in fiscal 2001 to cover expenses related to implementation of the plan and costs associated with elimination of fixed assets and employee severance. Key cost components of the plan include: (1) reduction of manufacturing capacity by abandoning and/or downsizing
15
facilities, (2) disposing of redundant assets, (3) termination of approximately 50 employees, and (4) outsourcing a significant portion of the combined operations higher volume products.
The Company was in negotiations to sublet the Maryland facility in the fall of 2002, but was subsequently unable to secure a long-term tenant. The Company has since been unable to sublet the Maryland facility and accordingly, an additional restructuring charge of $486,000 was recorded in 2003 representing the balance of lease payments for the facility. The Company will continue to actively market it, however at this time, it is uncertain if a suitable tenant can be found within the lease period. The Company will relocate the Tustin operations to a new facility in September 2004.
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
Income tax benefit for the years ended July 31, 2003 and 2002 was $1,078,000 and $540,000, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate (income tax benefit/expense as a percentage of pretax income) was 905.9% and 47.7% in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The U.S. federal corporate income tax rate exceeds the effective tax rate due primarily to the amortization of intangible assets that are not deductible for income tax purposes (in 2002 only), state and foreign income taxes, utilization of net operating loss carryforward and the valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance for deferred tax was reduced in 2002 and eliminated in 2003. Based on results from 2002 and 2003, the Company expects to be in a profitable position and able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future and has accordingly reduced the valuation allowance.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations is based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates estimates, including those related to the valuation of inventory and stock adjustments, for reasonableness. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
SI Technologies, Inc. (SI or Company) designs, manufactures and markets high performance industrial sensors, weighing and factory automation equipment, and related products. SI products incorporate devices, equipment and systems for the handling, inspection and measurement of goods and materials. Key markets served by SI include aerospace/aviation, food, forestry, manufacturing, mining, transportation/distribution and waste management. The Company sells throughout the United States and international markets. Approximately 48% of total revenues are international. Additional disclosure regarding components of the Companys businesses is in Note NIndustry and Geographic Area Segment Information.
1. Equity Compensation Plan Information
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation under the requirements of APB Opinion No. 25, which does not require compensation to be recorded if the consideration to be received is at least equal to fair value at the measurement date. Nonemployee stock-based transactions and stock warrants are accounted for under the requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires compensation to be recorded based on the fair value of the securities issued or the services received, whichever is more reliably measurable.
16
2. Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
The Company recognizes revenue only when all of the four following criteria are met: 1) Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, usually in the form of a written purchase order; 2) Delivery has occurred (or a shipment has been made, depending upon the terms of the purchase order) or services have been rendered; 3) The Companys price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, usually evidenced by a written purchase order; and 4) Collectability is reasonably assured, based on credit evaluation and history with the customer.
Additionally, on long-term contracts, sales are recorded based on the percentage that incurred costs bear to the total estimated costs at completion. Estimated cost to complete is based on the budget, incurred cost, risk assessment of the cost, and is then adjusted for normal/historical variance of project actual versus budget. Estimated losses are recorded in total when they become evident. These contracts are generally billed and collected based on contractual milestones throughout the project.
3. Reserves
Valuation allowances are maintained for doubtful accounts for estimated losses from the inability of the Companys customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. All receivable accounts are reviewed regularly by management and written off against the uncollectable reserve when it is determined that the account cannot reasonably be expected to be collected. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received. No interest is charged on past due accounts.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Each quarter, the Company evaluates its inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. These estimates are dependent on the Companys assessment of current and expected orders from its customers. Management estimates a reserve percentage for the estimated net realizable value of slow moving product based upon the number of years sales on hand. The Company reserves for potential excess and obsolete inventory based upon historical usage.
The Company offers warranties of various lengths to its customers depending on the specific product and terms of the customer purchase agreement. The average length of the warranty period is 12 months. The Companys warranties require it to repair or replace defective products during the warrant period at no cost to the customer. At the time the product revenue is recognized, the Company records a liability for estimated costs that may be incurred under its warranties. The costs are estimated based on historical experience and any specific warranty issues that may have been identified. (Although historical warranty costs have been within expectations, there can be no assurance that future warranty costs will not exceed historical amounts.) The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the balance as necessary.
Management also records a valuation allowance to reduce the Companys deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Management considers estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance.
4. Income taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities, including operating loss carryforwards, are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
17
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives, principally on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Estimated service lives of property and equipment are as follows:
Machinery and equipment |
2 to 10 years | |
Buildings |
35 years | |
Leasehold improvements |
2 to 10 years |
The straight-line method of depreciation is followed for substantially all assets for financial reporting purposes, while accelerated methods are used for tax purposes.
6. Goodwill
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company adopted SFAS 142 effective August 1, 2002.
In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company was required to carry out a transitional goodwill impairment evaluation, which requires an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. Initially, the Company identified its reporting units and determined the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities (including goodwill) to those reporting units as of the date of adoption. If the fair value of a reporting unit was below the units carrying amount, as computed in step one, the Company must complete step two of the transitional goodwill impairment test for that reporting unit as soon as possible, but not later than the end of the year of adoption. If the implied fair value of a reporting units goodwill is less than its recorded goodwill, a transitional goodwill impairment loss will be recognized and reported as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 20, Accounting Changes. Any subsequent impairment losses resulting from events or circumstances that occur after the first day of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 142 is adopted will be reported as a component of income from continuing or discontinued operations, as appropriate.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, management determined there were three reporting units. The carrying value of each respective reporting unit was compared to its current fair value determined using a discounted future cash flows approach. Due to the fair value of each reporting unit exceeding its carrying value, management determined no impairment existed. Management completed its annual goodwill impairment evaluation as of July 31, 2003, and further concluded that no additional impairment exists.
7. Impairment of long lived assets
The Company periodically reviews its long-lived assets, including patents, to determine potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets with the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cash flows from disposition. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss at that date. An impairment loss would be measured by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value (estimated discounted future cash flows) of the long-lived assets. For the year ended July 31, 2003, management has determined that no impairment of long-lived assets, including patents, exists.
18
Changes in circumstances, such as the passage of new laws or changes in regulations, technological advances or changes to the Companys business strategy, could result in the actual useful lives of long-lived assets differing from initial estimates. Factors such as changes in the planned use of equipment, customer attrition, contractual amendments or mandated regulator requirements could result in shortened useful lives. In those cases where the Company determines that the useful life of a long-lived asset should be revised, the Company will amortize or depreciate the net book value in excess of the estimated residual value of its revised remaining useful life.
8. Use of Estimates
In preparing the Companys financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns, reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventory, warrant obligations, excess facility capacity, deferred tax valuation allowances and recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including goodwill.
9. Pending Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entitiesan interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. This Interpretation defines a variable interest entity and provides that if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of the activities of the variable interest entity should be included in consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. Furthermore, the Board indicates that the voting interest approach of ARB No. 51 is not effective in identifying controlling financial interests in entities that are not controllable through voting interest or in which the equity investors do not bear the residual economic risk. This Interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after December 15, 2003, to variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Management believes the implementation of this Interpretation will not have a material effect upon the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003 FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, which requires that certain financial instruments previously presented as equity or temporary equity be presented as liabilities. Such instruments include mandatory redeemable preferred and common stock, and certain options and warrants. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments issued, entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and is generally effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of its operations.
INFLATION
Historically, the impact of inflation has been negligible, as the Company has been able to offset the effects through efficiency and price adjustments.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
None
19
CONSOLIDATED LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
At July 31, 2003, the Companys cash position was $284,000 compared to $238,000 at July 31, 2002. Cash available in excess of that required for general corporate purposes is used to reduce borrowings under the Companys line of credit. Working capital increased to $1,624,000 from $1,125,000 at July 31, 2002.
The Companys existing capital resources consist of cash balances and funds available under its line of credit, which are increased or decreased by cash provided by or used in operating activities. Cash used by operating activities in 2003 was $612,000. Operating income, reduction of trade receivables and the cash benefit of depreciation was used to reduce trade payables and increase inventories. Management anticipates generating cash from operating activities in 2004 by reducing inventories assuming revenues remain stable.
The Companys cash requirements consist of its general working capital needs, capital expenditures, and obligations under its leases and notes payable. Working capital requirements include the salary costs of employees and related overhead and the purchase of material and components. The Company anticipates capital expenditures of approximately $280,000 in 2004 as compared to $270,000 in 2003. The Company expects to refinance its current lines of credit and has sufficient cash flow available to pay current maturities of long-term debt of $1,898,000. A portion of the current maturities represents a note which has been renewed in the past. As of July 31, 2003, the Company had $385,000 available under its lines of credit.
In June 2002, the Company amended its principal credit agreement with its bank. The terms provide for a revolving line of credit up to a maximum of $6,500,000 with interest at prime plus 2.75%. Monthly payments on the line are interest only with principal due January 2, 2004. The credit agreement provides a term note for $1,500,000 with interest at prime plus 3.25%. Monthly payments on the new term note are $25,000 plus interest with principal due January 2, 2004. Monthly payments on the existing note payable are reduced to $56,058 plus interest at prime plus 1.75%, with the remaining terms of the existing note unchanged. The line and both notes are secured by substantially all of the Companys assets and are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. The Company is required to maintain certain levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, tangible net worth and fixed charge coverage and may not pay any cash dividends under terms of the agreement. The Company was in violation of one of these covenants at year end and has received a waiver from the bank.
The Company believes that cash flow from operations and funds available under its bank facilities will be sufficient to meet the Companys working capital needs and principal payments on long-term debt. No assurances can be made that the debt can be refinanced or replaced at favorable rates.
In the 4th Quarter the Company completed a private placement, as more fully described in Item 5, in which $750,000 of common stock was sold along with warrants.
20
CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS
As of July 31, 2003 the Company had contractual obligations in the form of non-cancelable operating leases (see Note H to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and long-term debt obligations (see Note E to the Consolidated Financial Statements), as follows:
(in thousands)
Total |
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||
Less than 1 year |
1-3 years |
4-5 years | ||||||||||
Operating Leases |
$ | 1,964 | $ | 1,117 | $ | 724 | $ | 123 | ||||
Long Term Debt |
5,264 | 1,898 | 3,366 | | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,228 | $ | 3,015 | $ | 4,090 | $ | 123 | ||||
Included in operating leases are payments included in other liabilities for which reserves have been established as more fully described in Note F to the financial statements.
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in the preceding discussion regarding the Companys financial position, business strategy and plans of management for future operations are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable; it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk represents the potential loss that may impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows due to adverse changes in the financial markets. The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in the base rates on our variable rate debt.
Interest rates-the domestic bank revolving line of credit and term debt (totaling $11,379 at July 31, 2003) bear interest at a variable rate of prime (4.0% at July 31, 2003) plus an additional amount, as defined in each respective debt agreement.
The Company has experienced minimal foreign currency fluctuation.
21
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
SI Technologies, Inc.
(Form 10-K) Pages(s) | ||
23-25 | ||
26 | ||
27 | ||
28 | ||
29 | ||
30-46 |
22
To the Board of Directors
SI Technologies, Inc.
Tustin, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of SI Technologies, Inc. as July 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of Revere Transducers Europe BV, a consolidated subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets and revenue constituting 16.3% and 32.9%, in 2003 of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Revere Transducers Europe BV, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SI Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in Note A to the financial statements, effective August 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
/S/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
Irvine, California
October 23, 2003, except for the 2nd paragraph of Note E which is dated November 13, 2003
23
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
Board of Directors
SI Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of SI Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of July 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended July 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of SI Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of July 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their consolidated cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended July 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/S/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Irvine, California
October 11, 2002
24
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
Board of Directors
Revere Transducers Europe BV and SI Technologies, Inc.
We have audited the balance sheet of Revere Transducers Europe BV (a wholly owned subsidiary of SI Technologies, Inc.) as of July 31, 2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Revere Transducers Europe BV as of July 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/S/ ARENTHALS GRANT THORNTON
Amsterdam
October 3, 2003
25
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
July 31,
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 284 | $ | 238 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $296 in 2003 and $251 in 2002 |
5,516 | 5,570 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
10,234 | 9,665 | ||||||
Other current assets |
337 | 842 | ||||||
Total current assets |
16,371 | 16,315 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
1,679 | 1,968 | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
1,509 | 446 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
||||||||
Goodwill, net |
7,002 | 7,002 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
91 | 51 | ||||||
Other assets |
291 | | ||||||
$ | 26,943 | $ | 25,782 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Revolving lines of credit |
$ | 8,242 | $ | 7,300 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
1,898 | 2,148 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
3,050 | 3,307 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
1,557 | 2,435 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
14,747 | 15,190 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
3,366 | 4,039 | ||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
408 | 360 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
| | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized, 2,000,000 shares; none outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized, 10,000,000; 4,026,996 and 3,579,935 (2003 and 2002, respectively) issued and outstanding |
40 | 36 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
11,163 | 10,377 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(2,798 | ) | (3,995 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
17 | (225 | ) | |||||
8,422 | 6,193 | |||||||
$ | 26,943 | $ | 25,782 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
26
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended July 31,
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 33,047 | $ | 32,613 | $ | 36,291 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
21,508 | 20,894 | 24,342 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
11,539 | 11,719 | 11,949 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
8,537 | 8,023 | 8,971 | |||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
1,565 | 1,388 | 1,621 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
9 | 365 | 426 | |||||||||
Restructuring charges |
486 | | 3,844 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| | 2,000 | |||||||||
10,597 | 9,776 | 16,862 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
942 | 1,943 | (4,913 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(976 | ) | (904 | ) | (1,564 | ) | ||||||
Other income, net |
153 | 94 | 11 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
119 | 1,133 | (6,466 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
1,078 | 540 | (662 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,197 | $ | 1,673 | $ | (7,128 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) per common share, basic |
$ | .33 | $ | .47 | $ | (2.00 | ) | |||||
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding |
3,684,926 | 3,579,935 | 3,563,529 | |||||||||
Income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution |
$ | .32 | $ | .47 | $ | (2.00 | ) | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
3,752,837 | 3,584,571 | 3,563,529 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
27
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Three years ended July 31, 2003
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)
Common Stock |
Additional paid-in capital |
Retained earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive income (loss) |
Total stockholders equity |
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2000 |
3,547,123 | $ | 35 | $ | 10,327 | $ | 1,460 | $ | (130 | ) | $ | 11,692 | ||||||||||||
Issuance of stock for legal settlement |
32,812 | 1 | 50 | | | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustmentnet of tax |
| | | | (294 | ) | (294 | ) | $ | (294 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (7,128 | ) | | (7,128 | ) | (7,128 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (7,422 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2001 |
3,579,935 | 36 | 10,377 | (5,668 | ) | (424 | ) | 4,321 | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustmentnet of tax |
| | | | 199 | 199 | $ | 199 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,673 | | 1,673 | 1,673 | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 1,872 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2002 |
3,579,935 | 36 | 10,377 | (3,995 | ) | (225 | ) | 6,193 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
25,000 | | 40 | | | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash |
422,061 | 4 | 746 | | | 750 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustmentnet of tax |
| | | | 242 | 242 | $ | 242 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,197 | | 1,197 | 1,197 | |||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 1,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2003 |
4,026,996 | $ | 40 | $ | 11,163 | $ | (2,798 | ) | $ | 17 | $ | 8,422 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
28
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended July 31,
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,197 | $ | 1,673 | $ | (7,128 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
643 | 1,017 | 1,530 | |||||||||
Restructuring charges |
486 | | 3,844 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| | 2,000 | |||||||||
Deferred lease and deferred rent costs |
(261 | ) | (209 | ) | (248 | ) | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(1,063 | ) | (557 | ) | 810 | |||||||
Non-cash common stock and options expenses |
| | 51 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
54 | 410 | 1,177 | |||||||||
Inventories |
(819 | ) | (1,081 | ) | 142 | |||||||
Income taxes receivable/payable |
209 | 404 | (255 | ) | ||||||||
Other current assets |
255 | (29 | ) | 54 | ||||||||
Accounts payable |
(257 | ) | 58 | (76 | ) | |||||||
Accrued liabilities |
(1,056 | ) | (776 | ) | (869 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
(612 | ) | 910 | 1,032 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Acquisition of intangibles and other assets |
| | (296 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(269 | ) | (118 | ) | (306 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(269 | ) | (118 | ) | (602 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of stock and option exercises |
790 | | | |||||||||
Net borrowings provided by (used in) line of credit |
941 | 258 | 1,404 | |||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(923 | ) | (1,285 | ) | (1,504 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
808 | (1,027 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes in cash |
119 | 93 | (62 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
46 | (142 | ) | 268 | ||||||||
Cash at beginning of year |
238 | 380 | 112 | |||||||||
Cash at end of year |
$ | 284 | $ | 238 | $ | 380 | ||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | 976 | $ | 904 | $ | 1,405 | ||||||
Income taxes |
$ | | $ | | $ | 23 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
29
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three Years Ended July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)
NOTE ASUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
SI Technologies, Inc. (SI or Company) designs, manufactures and markets high performance industrial sensors, weighing and factory automation equipment, and related products. SI products incorporate devices, equipment and systems for the handling, inspection and measurement of goods and materials. Key markets served by SI include aerospace/aviation, food, forestry, manufacturing, mining, transportation/distribution and waste management. The Company sells throughout the United States and international markets. Approximately 48% of total revenues are international. Additional disclosure regarding components of the Companys businesses is in Note KIndustry and Geographic Area Segment Information.
1. Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SI Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries; AeroGo, Inc., Allegany Technology, Inc., Revere Transducers, Inc., Revere Transducers Europe B.V., AeroGo Export, Inc., and IDEAutomation International, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
2. Equity Compensation Plan Information
The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation under the requirements of APB Opinion No. 25, which does not require compensation to be recorded if the consideration to be received is at least equal to fair value of the Companys common stock at the measurement date. Nonemployee stock-based transactions and stock warrants are accounted for under the requirements of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires compensation to be recorded based on the fair value of the securities issued or the services received, whichever is more reliably measurable.
The following table shows the proforma effect of stock based compensation on net income had the Company used the fair value method of accounting for stock option:
Years ended July 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 1,197 | $ | 1,673 | $ | (7,128 | ) | |||||
Deduct total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(204 | ) | (73 | ) | (151 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 993 | $ | 1,600 | $ | (7,279 | ) | |||||
Net income per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$.33 | $.47 | ($2.00 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$.27 | $.45 | ($2.04 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$.32 | $.47 | ($2.00 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$.26 | $.45 | ($2.04 | ) |
The fair value of each option and warrant grant, with the exception of warrants subject to repurchase as further discussed in Note J for which the measurement date will be the date of shareholder approval, is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: for fiscal 2003, 2002, and 2001 respectively, risk-free interest rate of approximately 3%, 4.05% and 4.84%; expected dividend yields of 0 percent; expected lives of 5 years and expected volatility of 73%, 69% and 64% percent. The
30
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
weighted-average fair value of options granted during the periods ending July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, for which the exercise price equals the market price on the grant date was $1.02 $.88 and $1.47 respectively. The option or warrant exercise price is equal to or more than the stocks market price on date of grant.
3. Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
The Company recognizes revenue only when all of the four following criteria are met: 1) Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, usually in the form of a written purchase order; 2) Delivery has occurred (or a shipment has been made, depending upon the terms of the purchase order) or services have been rendered; 3) The Companys price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, usually evidenced by a written purchase order; and 4) Collectability is reasonably assured, based on credit evaluation and history with the customer.
Additionally, on long-term contracts, sales are recorded based on the percentage that incurred costs bear to the total estimated costs at completion. Estimated cost to complete is based on the budget, incurred cost, risk assessment of the cost, and is then adjusted for normal/historical variance of project actual versus budget. Estimated losses are recorded in total when they become evident. These contracts are generally billed and collected based on contractual milestones throughout the project.
4. Reserves
Valuation allowances are maintained for doubtful accounts for estimated losses from the inability of the Companys customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. All receivable accounts are reviewed regularly by management and written off against the uncollectable reserve when it is determined that the account cannot reasonably be expected to be collected. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received. No interest is charged on past due accounts.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Each quarter, the Company evaluates its inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. These estimates are dependent on the Companys assessment of current and expected orders from its customers. Management estimates a reserve percentage for the estimated net realizable value of slow moving product based upon the number of years sales on hand. The Company reserves for potential excess and obsolete inventory based upon historical usage.
The Company offers warranties of various lengths to its customers depending on the specific product and terms of the customer purchase agreement. The average length of the warranty period is 12 months. The Companys warranties require it to repair or replace defective products during the warrant period at no cost to the customer. At the time the product revenue is recognized, the Company records a liability for estimated costs that may be incurred under its warranties. The costs are estimated based on historical experience and any specific warranty issues that may have been identified. (Although historical warranty costs have been within expectations, there can be no assurance that future warranty costs will not exceed historical amounts.) The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the balance as necessary.
Management also records a valuation allowance to reduce the Companys deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Management considers estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance.
5. Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs related to trade show and catalogue activity as incurred, which approximated $153, $275 and $242 for the years ended July 31, 2003 2002 and 2001 respectively.
31
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
6. Income taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities, including operating loss carryforwards, are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
7. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. There is no adjustment in the net income attributable to common stockholders. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options (67,911 and 4,636 equivalent shares in the fiscal years 2003 and 2002 respectively).
8. Fair value of financial instruments
Management believes that the carrying value of cash approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those financial instruments. Long-term debt bears interest at a rate indexed to the prime rate and, therefore, management believes the carrying value of the outstanding borrowings at July 31, 2003 approximates fair market value.
9. Research and Development
The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs expensed for the fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $1,565, $1,388 and $1,621 respectively.
10. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives, principally on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Estimated service lives of property and equipment are as follows:
Machinery and equipment |
2 to 10 years | |
Buildings |
35 years | |
Leasehold improvements |
2 to 10 years |
The straight-line method of depreciation is followed for substantially all assets for financial reporting purposes, while accelerated methods are used for tax purposes.
32
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
11. Goodwill
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company adopted SFAS 142 effective August 1, 2002.
In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company was required to carry out a transitional goodwill impairment evaluation, which requires an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption. Initially, the Company identified its reporting units and determined the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities (including goodwill) to those reporting units as of the date of adoption. If the fair value of a reporting unit was below the units carrying amount, as computed in step one, the Company must complete step two of the transitional goodwill impairment test for that reporting unit as soon as possible, but not later than the end of the year of adoption. If the implied fair value of a reporting units goodwill is less than its recorded goodwill, a transitional goodwill impairment loss will be recognized and reported as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 20, Accounting Changes. Any subsequent impairment losses resulting from events or circumstances that occur after the first day of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 142 is adopted will be reported as a component of income from continuing or discontinued operations, as appropriate.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, management determined there were three reporting units. The carrying value of each respective reporting unit was compared to its current fair value determined using a discounted future cash flows approach. Due to the fair value of each reporting unit exceeding its carrying value, management determined no impairment existed. Management completed its annual goodwill impairment evaluation as of July 31, 2003, and further concluded that no additional impairment exists.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended July 31, 2002 and 2003 are as follows:
Industrial Measurement |
Industrial Automation |
SI Consolidated |
||||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2001 |
$ | 3,514 | $ | 3,661 | $ | 7,175 | ||||||
Amortization |
(115 | ) | (175 | ) | (290 | ) | ||||||
Reclassification from other intangibles |
117 | 0 | 117 | |||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2002 |
3,516 | 3,486 | 7,002 | |||||||||
Change |
| | | |||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2003 |
$ | 3,516 | $ | 3,486 | $ | 7,002 | ||||||
33
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following is reconciliation of reported net income (loss) adjusted for adoption of SFAS No. 142 for the years ended July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Reported net income (loss) |
$ | 1,197 | $ | 1,673 | $ | (7,128 | ) | |||
Add back goodwill amortization, net of related tax |
| 183 | 236 | |||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) |
$ | 1,197 | $ | 1,856 | $ | (6,892 | ) | |||
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | .33 | $ | 0.47 | $ | (2.00 | ) | |||
Goodwill amortization, net of related tax |
| 0.05 | .07 | |||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) |
$ | .33 | $ | 0.52 | $ | (1.93 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||
Reported net (loss) income |
$ | .32 | $ | 0.47 | $ | (2.00 | ) | |||
Goodwill amortization, net of related tax |
| 0.05 | .07 | |||||||
Adjusted net income (loss) |
$ | .32 | $ | 0.52 | $ | (1.93 | ) | |||
12. Impairment of long lived assets
The Company periodically reviews its long-lived assets, including patents, to determine potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets with the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cash flows from disposition. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are grouped with other assets to the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss at that date. An impairment loss would be measured by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value (estimated discounted future cash flows) of the long-lived assets. For the year ended July 31, 2003, management has determined that no impairment of long-lived assets, including patents, exists.
Changes in circumstances, such as the passage of new laws or changes in regulations, technological advances or changes to the Companys business strategy, could result in the actual useful lives of long-lived assets differing from initial estimates. Factors such as changes in the planned use of equipment, customer attrition, contractual amendments or mandated regulator requirements could result in shortened useful lives. In those cases where the Company determines that the useful life of a long-lived asset should be revised, the Company will amortize or depreciate the net book value in excess of the estimated residual value over its revised remaining useful life.
The Company has acquired patents totaling approximately $829 which are being amortized over their respective useful lives of 15 years. Patent amortization for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 was approximately $8, $39, and $57, respectively, for each year. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is approximately $6 annually, all of which relates to these patents.
13. Comprehensive Income
The functional currency of Reverse Transducers Europe is determined to be the Euro. Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into their U.S. dollar equivalents based on year-end exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates for the appropriate fiscal year. Aggregate
34
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of foreign assets and liabilities are included in stockholders equity. Transaction gains and losses are included in income and have not been significant in amount.
14. Use of Estimates
In preparing the Companys financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns, reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventory, warranty obligations, excess facility capacity, deferred tax valuation allowances and recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including goodwill.
15. Pending Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. This Interpretation defines a variable interest entity and provides that if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities, and results of the activities of the variable interest entity should be included in consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. Furthermore, the Board indicates that the voting interest approach of ARB No. 51 is not effective in identifying controlling financial interests in entities that are not controllable through voting interest or in which the equity investors do not bear the residual economic risk. This Interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after December 15, 2003, to variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Management believes the implementation of this Interpretation will not have a material effect upon the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003 FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, which requires that certain financial instruments previously presented as equity or temporary equity be presented as liabilities. Such instruments include mandatory redeemable preferred and common stock, and certain options and warrants. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments issued, entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and is generally effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of its operations.
16. Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2002 amounts to be consistent with the 2003 presentation with no effect on net income or ending equity.
35
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE BINVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following at July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 4,769 | $ | 4,767 | ||||
Work in process |
1,257 | 1,162 | ||||||
Finished goods |
4,810 | 4,349 | ||||||
10,836 | 10,278 | |||||||
Less reserve for excess and obsolete inventories |
(602 | ) | (613 | ) | ||||
Inventories, net |
$ | 10,234 | $ | 9,665 | ||||
During 2003, approximately $250 of raw material critical to the Companys operations, yet in large quantities, was reclassified to other assets to reflect long term nature of the use of the material. Although the Company believes that the full value of the material will be realized, the reclassification more accurately reflects the use of the material. During 2002, approximately $293 of excess and obsolete inventory was disposed of during the year.
NOTE CPROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of the following at July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Machinery and equipment |
$ | 4,711 | $ | 4,301 | ||||
Buildings |
309 | 281 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
293 | 244 | ||||||
5,313 | 4,826 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(3,634 | ) | (2,858 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 1,679 | $ | 1,968 | ||||
The Company abandoned certain assets having a cost of $1,623 and accumulated depreciation of $1,470 as of July 31, 2002, respectively in connection with its restructuring plan (see Note M).
NOTE DACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following at July 31:
2003 |
2002 | |||||
Accrued salaries, wages and other compensation |
$ | 766 | $ | 767 | ||
Warranty reserve |
105 | 271 | ||||
Restructuring charges (see Note M) |
177 | 360 | ||||
Deferred lease and rent costcurrent |
205 | 205 | ||||
Other |
304 | 832 | ||||
$ | 1,557 | $ | 2,435 | |||
36
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE EDEBT
Debt consists of the following at July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
1) Revolving line of credit with a bank for up to $6,500 interest at the prime rate plus 2.75% (at July 31, 2003, totaling 6.75%), secured by the Companys trade accounts receivable, inventories and certain equipment. Principal and interest due January 2004. Utilized for U.S. operations. |
$ | 6,115 | $ | 5,344 | ||||
2) Revolving line of credit with a bank for up to $2,212 (Euro 2,250), interest at the rate of 6.75%, secured by certain of the Companys trade accounts receivable, inventories and equipment. Interest only due quarterly. Utilized for European operations. |
2,127 | 1,956 | ||||||
3) Note payable to bank in monthly installments of $56 plus interest at the prime rate plus 1.75% (totaling 5.75% at July 31, 2003), secured by substantially all of the Companys assets, due November 2005. |
4,039 | 4,712 | ||||||
4) Note payable to bank in monthly installments of $25 plus interest at the prime rate plus 3.25%, secured by substantially all of the Companys assets, due January 2004. |
1,225 | 1,475 | ||||||
13,506 | 13,487 | |||||||
Less current maturities of debt |
(10,140 | ) | (9,448 | ) | ||||
Long term debt |
$ | 3,366 | $ | 4,039 | ||||
Revolving lines of credit and current maturities of long term debt were $10,140 as of July 31, 2003 and consisted of $2,127 owed on the Companys European line of credit, $6,115 owed on the Companys U.S. line of credit and the current portion of the Companys long-term debt of $1,898.
In November 2003, the Company obtained an extension to the principal credit agreement with its bank to January 2, 2004. The Company had excess borrowing capacity of $385 at July 31, 2003. The credit agreement provides for a revolving line of credit up to a maximum of $6,500 with interest at prime (4% at July 31, 2003) plus 2.75% (balance at July 31, 6.75%). Monthly payments on the line are interest only with principal due January 2, 2004. The credit agreement continues the $1,500 term note (balance at July 31, 2003 of $1,225) with interest at prime plus 3.25%. Monthly payments are $25 principal plus interest with the balance due January 2, 2004. Monthly payments on the second note payable of $4,207 are $56 plus interest at prime plus 1.75%. The line and both notes are secured by substantially all of the Companys assets and are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. The Company is required to maintain certain levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, tangible net worth and fixed charge coverage and may not pay any cash dividends. At July 31, 2003, the Company was not in compliance with one covenant which was subsequently waived on November 13, 2003.
The maturities on long-term debt are as follows:
Year ending July 31, |
|||
2004 |
$ | 1,898 | |
2005 |
673 | ||
2006 |
2,693 | ||
$ | 5,264 | ||
37
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
NOTE FOTHER LIABILITIES
Other liabilities consist of the following at July 31:
2003 |
2002 | |||||
Deferred lease costs |
$ | 26 | $ | 186 | ||
Deferred rent |
73 | 174 | ||||
Restructuring Reserve |
309 | | ||||
$ | 408 | $ | 360 | |||
Deferred lease costs arising from an acquisition represent the discounted operating lease costs for excess plant capacity acquired at the acquisition date totaling $995. The deferred lease cost is amortized over 40 months, the remaining life of the lease. The deferred rent is attributable to escalating rental payments on the Tustin facility lease, which is accounted for using the straight line method of the total lease cost. The restructuring reserve is related to the lease payments due on the Maryland facility.
NOTE GFOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION LOSS
In 2003 and 2002, respectively, the Company incurred a foreign currency translation gains of $242 and $199, respectively due to differences in the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Euro.
NOTE HCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
1. Leases
The Company conducts a portion of its operations in leased facilities under noncancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through 2007. A portion of one manufacturing facility is subleased under a lease, which expires in 2004. At July 31, 2003, total future minimum sublease rentals for 2003 through 2005 amount to $138.
The minimum rental commitments, excluding sublease income, under operating leases are as follows:
Year ending July 31, |
|||
2004 |
$ | 1,117 | |
2005 |
438 | ||
2006 |
286 | ||
2007 |
123 | ||
$ | 1,964 | ||
Rent expense under noncancelable operating leases was approximately $739, $713, and $726 for the years ended July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Sublease income was approximately $119, $119 and $113 for the years ended July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Portions of the rent expense for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were reduced by charges to the restructuring reserve of $327, $311 and $164, respectively.
38
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
2. Consulting and Non-compete Agreements
Certain former executives of acquired companies entered into consulting and non-compete agreements with the Company. The consulting agreements have a term of five years and the non-compete agreements have terms ranging from two to ten years. The following table summarizes remaining obligations under these agreements:
Year ending July 31, |
|||
2004 |
$ | 63 | |
2005 |
63 | ||
2006 |
47 | ||
$ | 173 | ||
The expense associated with these agreements totaled $123, $123, and $288 for the years ended July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
3. Litigation
The Company is engaged in various legal actions as of July 31, 2003. In the opinion of management, based upon the advice of counsel, the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
NOTE IINCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes on the liability method as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109).
Income tax benefit (expense) consists of the following for the year ended July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||
Current (expense ) benefit |
$ | 15 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | 255 | ||||
Deferred (expense ) benefit |
1,063 | 557 | (917 | ) | |||||||
$ | 1,078 | $ | 540 | $ | (662 | ) | |||||
The income tax benefit (expense) reconciled to the tax computed at the statutory federal rate was as follows for the year ended July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Tax at statutory rate |
$ | (42 | ) | $ | (391 | ) | $ | 2,198 | ||||
Valuation allowance |
1,040 | 875 | (1,915 | ) | ||||||||
Nondeductible goodwill |
(3 | ) | (134 | ) | (975 | ) | ||||||
Nondeductible meals and entertainment |
(31 | ) | | | ||||||||
Credits and net operating losses utilized |
129 | 156 | | |||||||||
State and foreign taxes |
(2 | ) | | 137 | ||||||||
Other |
(13 | ) | 34 | (107 | ) | |||||||
$ | 1,078 | $ | 540 | $ | (662 | ) | ||||||
39
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The components of deferred taxes included in the balance sheet are as follows at July 31:
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 181 | $ | | |||
Accrued compensation and warranty |
165 | 440 | |||||
Provision for bad debts |
110 | 95 | |||||
Inventory reserve and capitalized overhead |
223 | 218 | |||||
Asset write-downs |
| 902 | |||||
Accrued facility costs |
180 | 245 | |||||
Differences in book/tax depreciation |
444 | ||||||
Deferred lease costs |
69 | ||||||
Research and development tax credits |
129 | ||||||
Other |
8 | 15 | |||||
1,509 | 1,915 | ||||||
Valuation allowance |
| 1,040 | |||||
1,509 | 875 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|||||||
Excess of tax over book depreciation |
| (389 | ) | ||||
Deferred state taxes |
| (40 | ) | ||||
| (429 | ) | |||||
Net Deferred Tax Asset |
$ | 1,509 | $ | 446 | |||
The valuation allowance was reduced by $1,040 and $875 in 2003 and 2002 respectively. The reduction of the valuation allowance was a result of the Companys profitability in the current year and estimated profitability in the future years. Should the estimated profitability in the future decrease, a valuation allowance may be required. At July 31, 2003, the Company had approximately $525 in net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes and $240 in net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax purposes available to offset future taxable income. All federal net operating losses expire by fiscal year and July 31, 2023. State net operating losses expire as follows: 2012 $136; 2014 $87; 2016 $6; and 2023 $11.
NOTE JSTOCK OPTION PLAN AND WARRANTS
The Company implemented a stock option plan in 1995 (the Plan) and has authorized a total of 600,000 shares of common stock to be granted under the Plan. The Company has granted all options available to grant under the Plan at July 31, 2003, and will present to the shareholders the 2003 Stock Option Plan to authorize additional common stock to be granted under the new Plan. The vesting period and expiration dates of the stock options are at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and range up to five years. Additionally, options to purchase 100,000 shares are outstanding under the old stock option plan that expired July 31, 1994.
On April 22, 2003, the Company sold an aggregate of 281,374 shares of the Companys common stock (the Common Stock) to two accredited investors, Ralph E. Crump (Chairman of the Board, Treasurer, and Director of the Company) and his wife, Marjorie Crump, for a total sale price of $500,000. The sale was made in reliance upon the private placement exemption contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D. In connection with the offering the Company also issued a five-year warrant to purchase 56,275 shares of Common Stock to Ralph E. Crump and a five-year warrant to purchase 56,275 shares
40
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
of Common Stock to Marjorie Crump. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.50 per share. Both Ralph E. Crump and Marjorie Crump have signed an agreement with the Company agreeing not to exercise these warrants, purchase any additional shares of common stock or obtain any benefit associated with holding the Common Stock of the warrants until shareholder approval of this sale is obtained at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
In order for the transaction to be approved, a majority of the votes cast on the proposal in person or by proxy must be cast in favor of the transaction. The Company has agreed with Mr. and Mrs. Crump that, if the Transaction is not approved, the Company will repurchase 25,000 warrants from Mr. and Mrs. Crump at a price of $.75 per warrant share to reduce their beneficial ownership percentage to less than 20%. If shareholder approval was not obtained, and this repurchase were to occur, Mr. and Mrs. Crump would be the beneficial owners of approximately 19.9% of the outstanding common stock of the Company.
In June 2003, the Company sold an aggregate of 140,687 shares of Common Stock to 4 additional unaffiliated accredited investors, for a total sale price of $250,000. The sale was made in reliance upon the private placement exemption contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D. In connection with the offering the Company also issued a five-year warrant to purchase 56,275 shares of Common Stock to these investors. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.50 per share.
The following tables summarize information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable stock options:
Stock Options and Warrants Outstanding |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price |
Shares Exercisable |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2000 |
551,496 | $ | 3.29 | ||||||||
Granted |
100,000 | $ | 1.94 | ||||||||
Exercised |
| $ | | ||||||||
Expired/canceled |
| $ | | ||||||||
Balance, July 31, 2001 |
651,496 | $ | 3.16 | 427,500 | $ | 2.82 | |||||
Granted |
170,000 | $ | 1.13 | ||||||||
Exercised |
| $ | | ||||||||
Expired/canceled |
(75,000 | ) | $ | 1.81 | |||||||
Balance, July 31, 2002 |
746,496 | $ | 2.77 | 494,500 | $ | 2.76 | |||||
Granted |
238,824 | $ | 2.20 | ||||||||
Exercised |
25,000 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||
Expired/canceled |
(108,996 | ) | $ | 4.56 | |||||||
Balance, July 31, 2003 |
851,324 | $ | 2.41 | 797,824 | $ | 2.49 | |||||
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number of Shares Outstanding As of July 31, 2003 |
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life in Years |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||
$0-$1 |
10,000 | 9.0 | $ | 0.90 | |||
$1-$2 |
350,000 | 5.2 | $ | 1.46 | |||
$2-$3 |
333,824 | 5.3 | $ | 2.45 | |||
$3-$4 |
500 | 2.3 | $ | 3.25 | |||
$4-$5 |
157,000 | 3.5 | $ | 4.53 | |||
851,324 | |||||||
41
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number of Shares Exercisable as of July 31, |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price | |||
$0-$1 |
2,000 | $ | 0.90 | ||
$1-$2 |
308,500 | $ | 1.51 | ||
$2-$3 |
329,824 | $ | 2.46 | ||
$3-$4 |
500 | $ | 3.25 | ||
$4-$5 |
157,000 | $ | 4.53 | ||
797,824 | |||||
NOTE KINDUSTRY AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company applies the principles of SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The Company operates in three operating sements, two of which are combined resulting in two reporting business segments(1) industrial measurement, and (2) industrial automation. The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products. They are managed separately based on the fundamental differences in their operations. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note ASummary of Significant Accounting Policies.
For 2003, approximately 75% of the Americas sales are within the United States, and 5% are within Canada. European sales are primarily United Kingdom, and France. No single customer or control group represents more the 10% of total sales.
Included in the industrial measurement segment are industrial sensors and controls products consisting of a wide range of NTEP and OIML approved, EX, Factory Mutual and IP rated load cells, transducers, translators and sensors. When matched with microprocessor-controlled digital electronics, they measure forces such as pressure, weight, mass and torque. Weighing Systems products constitute the combination of load cells and microprocessor-controlled digital electronics that in combination provide for an integrated system providing weight data in both dynamic and static industrial weighing applications.
The industrial automation segment consists of load handling, moving and positioning equipment and systems for applications in manufacturing, construction and other environments in which heavy bulky materials are being transported and positioned.
Foreign Operations
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Identifiable Assets: |
||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 22,616 | $ | 21,102 | $ | 21,812 | ||||
Europe |
4,327 | 4,680 | 4,098 | |||||||
Long-lived Assets: |
||||||||||
Americas |
9,741 | 8,547 | 9,064 | |||||||
Europe |
831 | 920 | 1,003 | |||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||
Americas |
23,102 | 23,946 | 27,566 | |||||||
Europe |
9,945 | 8,667 | 8,725 | |||||||
Operating Profit (Loss): |
||||||||||
Americas |
699 | 1,416 | (5,578 | ) | ||||||
Europe |
243 | 527 | 665 |
42
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Segment Information 2003
Industrial Measurement |
Industrial Automation |
SI Consolidated |
||||||||
Year ended July 31, 2003: |
||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 26,523 | $ | 6,524 | $ | 33,047 | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
17,774 | 3,734 | 21,508 | |||||||
Gross profit |
8,749 | 2,790 | 11,539 | |||||||
Gross profit % |
33% | 42% | 35% | |||||||
Operating expenses |
7,715 | 2,396 | 10,111 | |||||||
Restructuring charges |
486 | | 486 | |||||||
Operating profit |
$ | 548 | $ | 394 | 942 | |||||
Interest expense |
(976 | ) | ||||||||
Other income, net |
153 | |||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
119 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit |
1,078 | |||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 1,197 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 591 | $ | 52 | $ | 643 | ||||
Assets |
$ | 22,839 | $ | 4,104 | $ | 26,943 | ||||
Segment Information 2002
Industrial Measurement |
Industrial Automation |
SI Consolidated |
||||||||
Year ended July 31, 2002: |
||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 25,407 | $ | 7,206 | $ | 32,613 | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
16,827 | 4,067 | 20,894 | |||||||
Gross profit |
8,580 | 3,139 | 11,719 | |||||||
Gross profit % |
34% | 44% | 36% | |||||||
Operating expenses |
6,947 | 2,829 | 9,776 | |||||||
Operating profit |
$ | 1,633 | $ | 310 | 1,943 | |||||
Interest expense |
(904 | ) | ||||||||
Other income, net |
94 | |||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
1,133 | |||||||||
Income tax benefit |
540 | |||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 1,673 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 748 | $ | 269 | $ | 1,017 | ||||
Assets |
$ | 21,147 | $ | 4,635 | $ | 25,782 | ||||
43
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Segment Information 2001
Industrial Measurement |
Industrial Automation |
SI Consolidated |
|||||||||
Year ended July 31, 2001: |
|||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 28,289 | $ | 8,002 | $ | 36,291 | |||||
Cost of goods sold |
19,994 | 4,348 | 24,342 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
8,295 | 3,654 | 11,949 | ||||||||
Gross profit % |
29% | 46% | 33% | ||||||||
Operating expenses |
8,063 | 2,955 | 11,018 | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
3,844 | | 3,844 | ||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
2,000 | | 2,000 | ||||||||
Total expense |
13,907 | 2,955 | 16,862 | ||||||||
Operating profit (loss) |
$ | (5,612 | ) | $ | 699 | (4,913 | ) | ||||
Interest expense |
(1,564 | ) | |||||||||
Other income, net |
11 | ||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(6,466 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
(662 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (7,128 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 1,242 | $ | 288 | $ | 1,530 | |||||
Assets |
$ | 20,542 | $ | 5,368 | $ | 25,910 | |||||
NOTE LBENEFIT PLANS
The Company has defined contribution 401(k) plans for each subsidiary. All employees are eligible for participation upon completion of a waiting period. The contribution expense associated with these plans totaled approximately $6, $26, and $162 for the years ended July 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Companys matching contribution was decreased in 2002.
NOTE MRESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In the third quarter of 2001, the Company announced a Restructuring Plan to address a significant decline in sales brought about by the then nine-month old global manufacturing recession and to position the Company for improved profitability in the future. The plan announced was comprised of the three key components. First, was the consolidation of the SI/Allegany business unit and Revere Transducers, resulting in the closing of operations in Cumberland, Maryland. Second, the plan called for development of offshore manufacturing sources to reduce costs on certain high-volume, highly competitive load cells and sensors. The third component of the plan was for a downsizing of the Companys Tustin, California, headquarters and manufacturing facility to a more appropriately sized facility in the same general area. In recognition of the expenses associated with this restructuring, the Company recorded a $3,844 charge in fiscal 2001 to cover expenses related to implementation of the plan and costs associated with elimination of fixed assets and employee severance. Key cost components of the plan include: (1) reduction of manufacturing capacity by abandoning and/or downsizing facilities, (2) disposing of redundant assets, (3) termination of approximately 50 employees, and (4) outsourcing a significant portion of the combined operations higher volume products.
44
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The Company has been unable to sublet the Maryland facility. An additional restructuring charge of $486 was recorded in 2003 representing the balance of lease payments for the facility. The Company will continue to actively market it, however at this time, it is uncertain if a suitable tenant can be found within the lease period. The Company was in negotiations to sublet the facility in the fall of 2002, but subsequently unable to secure a long-term tenant.
NOTE NVALUATION AND ACCOUNT QUALIFYING INFORMATION
Fiscal Year |
Balance at beginning of year |
Provision charged to expense |
Net Recoveries |
Balance at end of year | |||||||
Doubtful accounts |
2003 | 251 | 146 | (101 | ) | 296 | |||||
2002 | 289 | 82 | (120 | ) | 251 | ||||||
2001 | 221 | 186 | (118 | ) | 289 | ||||||
Slow moving and obsolete inventory |
2003 | 613 | 202 | (213 | ) | 602 | |||||
2002 | 1,174 | 48 | (609 | ) | 613 | ||||||
2001 | 1,303 | 35 | (164 | ) | 1,174 | ||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
2003 | 1,040 | | 1,040 | | ||||||
2002 | 1,915 | | 875 | 1,040 | |||||||
2001 | | 1,915 | | 1,915 | |||||||
Restructuring reserve |
2003 | 360 | 486 | (360 | ) | 486 | |||||
2002 | 1,281 | | (921 | ) | 360 | ||||||
2001 | | 3,844 | (2,563 | ) | 1,281 | ||||||
Warranty reserve |
2003 | 271 | 78 | (245 | ) | 104 | |||||
2002 | 224 | 427 | (380 | ) | 271 | ||||||
2001 | 348 | 137 | (261 | ) | 224 |
NOTE OSELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth selected quarterly financial data for the eight quarters ended July 31:
Quarter Ended- |
||||||||||||||||
October 31, 2002 |
January 31, 2003 |
April 30, 2003 |
July 31, 2003 |
Total | ||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 7,836 | $ | 8,230 | $ | 8,663 | $ | 8,318 | $ | 33,047 | ||||||
Gross Profit |
3,035 | 3,052 | 2,877 | 2,575 | 11,539 | |||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operations |
552 | 532 | 393 | (535 | ) | 942 | ||||||||||
Net earnings |
314 | 353 | 243 | 287 | 1,197 | |||||||||||
Net income per share, basic |
$ | .09 | $ | .10 | $ | .07 | $ | .07 | $ | .33 | ||||||
Net income per share, diluted |
$ | .09 | $ | .10 | $ | .07 | $ | .06 | $ | .32 | ||||||
45
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Fourth quarter results reflect recognition of deferred tax benefits of $678. The Company has been unable to sublet the Maryland facility. An additional restructuring charge of $486 was recorded in the 4th quarter of 2003 representing the balance of lease payments for the facility. During the fourth quarter, a combination of adjustments to inventory reserves and write-offs of slow-moving inventory items, which were either ready to sell as finished goods or use to produce finished goods, totaled $50. Those adjustment amounts, which related to current estimates regarding the extent to which some inventory items would contribute to future sales, were charged to cost of revenues.
October 31, 2001 |
January 31, 2002 |
April 30, 2002 |
July 31, 2002 |
Total | |||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 8,536 | $ | 8,014 | $ | 7,759 | $ | 8,304 | $ | 32,613 | |||||
Gross Profit |
2,978 | 2,783 | 2,691 | 3,267 | 11,719 | ||||||||||
Earnings from operations |
570 | 441 | 393 | 539 | 1,943 | ||||||||||
Net earnings |
353 | 166 | 197 | 957 | 1,673 | ||||||||||
Net income per share, basic |
$ | .10 | $ | .05 | $ | .05 | $ | .27 | $ | .47 | |||||
Net income per share, diluted |
$ | .10 | $ | .05 | $ | .05 | $ | .27 | $ | .47 | |||||
NOTE PLEGAL MATTERS
From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal matters in the normal course of business. Management does not believe any matter exists at July 31, 2003, which would result in any significant adverse effect to the financial statements.
46
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
The Company changed its primary auditors to McGladrey & Pullen LLP, from Grant Thornton, LLP during the 2003. No disagreements occurred with the accountants on matters of accounting or financial disclosure.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
At the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Principal Executive Officer and the Companys Principal Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Companys Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date the Company completed its evaluation.
47
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The response to this Item is contained in part in the Companys definitive proxy statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the 2003 Proxy Statement) under the captions ManagementDirectors and Executive Officers, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, and Code of Ethics and the information contained therein is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The response to this Item is contained in the 2003 Proxy Statement under the caption Executive Compensation and the information contained therein is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The response to this Item is contained in the 2003 Proxy Statement under the caption Principal Holders of Voting Securities and the information therein is incorporated herein by reference.
The balance of the response to this item is found in Part II, item 5, under the caption Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The response to this Item is contained in the 2003 Proxy Statement under the caption Certain Transactions and the information therein is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICE
The response to this Item is contained in the 2003 Proxy Statement under the caption Audit Fees and Services and the information therein is incorporated herein by reference.
48
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed herewith as part of this report:
Pages(s) | ||
1. Audited Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules |
||
Reports of Independent Certified Public Accountants |
23-25 | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
26 | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
27 | |
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity |
28 | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
29 | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
30-46 | |
2. Exhibits: |
||
Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
||
Exhibit 31.1 Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer |
||
Exhibit 31.2 Certificate of the Principal Accounting Officer |
||
Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 |
||
Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATED: November 19, 2003 |
SI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | |||||||
By: | /s/ RICK A. BEETS | |||||||
Rick A. Beets President |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed as of November 19, 2003 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated:
/s/ RICK A. BEETS Rick A. Beets |
President, CEO, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|||
/s/ DAVID M. GERNAK David M. Gernak |
Principal Accounting Officer |
|||
/s/ EDWARD A. ALKIRE Edward A. Alkire |
Director, Secretary |
|||
/s/ RALPH E. CRUMP Ralph E. Crump |
Chairman of the Board, Director, Treasurer |
|||
/s/ D. DEAN SPATZ D. Dean Spatz |
Director |
|||
S. Scott Crump |
Director |
|||
Heinz Zweipfennig |
Director |
50