10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-14443
Gartner, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3099750 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
P.O. Box 10212
|
|
06902-7700 |
56 Top Gallant Road
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Stamford, CT |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (203) 316-1111
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 24, 2007, 105,517,056 shares of the registrants common shares were outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
GARTNER, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
102,838 |
|
|
$ |
67,801 |
|
Fees receivable, net |
|
|
303,508 |
|
|
|
328,383 |
|
Deferred commissions |
|
|
43,520 |
|
|
|
46,822 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
65,792 |
|
|
|
41,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
515,658 |
|
|
|
484,033 |
|
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
60,653 |
|
|
|
59,715 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
410,956 |
|
|
|
408,545 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
5,978 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
87,625 |
|
|
|
81,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,079,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,039,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
177,905 |
|
|
$ |
208,002 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
377,183 |
|
|
|
375,881 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
748,588 |
|
|
|
803,883 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
166,500 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
83,956 |
|
|
|
59,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
999,044 |
|
|
|
1,013,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
539,506 |
|
|
|
544,686 |
|
Unearned compensation, net |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(2,208 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net |
|
|
18,098 |
|
|
|
13,097 |
|
Accumulated earnings |
|
|
271,244 |
|
|
|
249,004 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(747,829 |
) |
|
|
(778,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
80,461 |
|
|
|
26,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,079,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,039,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GARTNER, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research |
|
$ |
163,753 |
|
|
$ |
138,321 |
|
|
$ |
322,553 |
|
|
$ |
275,413 |
|
Consulting |
|
|
83,555 |
|
|
|
83,663 |
|
|
|
159,822 |
|
|
|
159,556 |
|
Events |
|
|
53,005 |
|
|
|
58,599 |
|
|
|
79,932 |
|
|
|
73,094 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,178 |
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
5,381 |
|
|
|
6,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
303,491 |
|
|
|
284,093 |
|
|
|
567,688 |
|
|
|
515,022 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and product development |
|
|
144,211 |
|
|
|
137,283 |
|
|
|
267,924 |
|
|
|
242,632 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
120,523 |
|
|
|
106,701 |
|
|
|
236,269 |
|
|
|
206,168 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
6,012 |
|
|
|
6,098 |
|
|
|
11,747 |
|
|
|
11,758 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
6,799 |
|
META integration charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
Other charges |
|
|
9,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
280,426 |
|
|
|
253,498 |
|
|
|
526,149 |
|
|
|
468,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,065 |
|
|
|
30,595 |
|
|
|
41,539 |
|
|
|
46,215 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(5,398 |
) |
|
|
(4,479 |
) |
|
|
(11,661 |
) |
|
|
(8,842 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
(521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
19,481 |
|
|
|
26,289 |
|
|
|
31,654 |
|
|
|
36,852 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
8,045 |
|
|
|
9,414 |
|
|
|
10,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,048 |
|
|
$ |
18,244 |
|
|
$ |
22,240 |
|
|
$ |
26,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
104,259 |
|
|
|
113,525 |
|
|
|
103,890 |
|
|
|
113,646 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
109,571 |
|
|
|
115,743 |
|
|
|
108,941 |
|
|
|
115,911 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
GARTNER, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income: |
|
$ |
22,240 |
|
|
$ |
26,014 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles |
|
|
12,872 |
|
|
|
18,557 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
6,997 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(13,726 |
) |
|
|
(3,653 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(2,302 |
) |
Amortization and writeoff of debt issue costs |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees receivable, net |
|
|
28,012 |
|
|
|
32,829 |
|
Deferred commissions |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
12,278 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(22,955 |
) |
|
|
(413 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(6,540 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(3,030 |
) |
|
|
1,568 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
9,158 |
|
|
|
(58,727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
43,693 |
|
|
|
32,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(12,430 |
) |
|
|
(7,978 |
) |
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,421 |
) |
|
|
(8,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from interest rate swap termination |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock issued for stock plans |
|
|
27,522 |
|
|
|
22,073 |
|
Proceeds from debt issuance |
|
|
405,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt issuance costs |
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on debt |
|
|
(415,000 |
) |
|
|
(16,666 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(29,690 |
) |
|
|
(37,025 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
13,726 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided (used) in financing activities |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
(27,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
32,740 |
|
|
|
(3,173 |
) |
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
67,801 |
|
|
|
70,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
102,838 |
|
|
$ |
69,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
GARTNER, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes of Gartner, Inc. (Gartner or the Company) filed in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of operating revenues and
expenses. These estimates are based on managements knowledge and judgments. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a
fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for
the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007 may not be indicative of the results of operations for the remainder of 2007.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Sales tax collected from customers remitted to governmental authorities is presented on a net basis
in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 2 Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, net of tax effect, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,048 |
|
|
$ |
18,244 |
|
|
$ |
22,240 |
|
|
$ |
26,014 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
Realized gain on interest rate swap (a) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of pension unrealized loss |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
|
$ |
22,039 |
|
|
$ |
27,241 |
|
|
$ |
31,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The six months ended June 30, 2007 is net of approximately $0.2 million reclassified to
earnings. |
Note 3 Computations of Income per Share of Common Stock
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the basic and diluted income per share (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used for calculating basic and diluted income
per share |
|
$ |
14,048 |
|
|
$ |
18,244 |
|
|
$ |
22,240 |
|
|
$ |
26,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in
the calculation of basic income per share |
|
|
104,259 |
|
|
|
113,525 |
|
|
|
103,890 |
|
|
|
113,646 |
|
Common stock equivalents associated with
stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Shares used in the calculation of diluted income per share |
|
|
109,571 |
|
|
|
115,743 |
|
|
|
108,941 |
|
|
|
115,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, 0.6 million and 2.2 million options and stock
appreciation rights, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted income per share
because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, 0.5 million and 2.0 million options and stock
appreciation rights, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted income per share
because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 4 Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants stock-based compensation awards as an incentive for employees and directors to
contribute to the Companys long-term success. The Companys awards include stock options,
stock-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, service- and performance-based
restricted stock units, and common stock equivalents.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), as interpreted by SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107). Under SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation
expense is based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant, which is recognized over the
related service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The service period is the period over which
the related service is performed, which is generally the same as the vesting period. All of the
Companys stock-based compensation awards are classified as equity awards in accordance with SFAS
No. 123(R). The Company recognized the following amounts of stock-based compensation expense under
SFAS No. 123(R) in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Amount recorded in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services and product development expense |
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
13,400 |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007, the Company had $50.5 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation
cost, which is expected to be recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining
weighted-average service period of approximately 2.6 years. For the six months ended June 30, 2007,
excess tax benefits realized from the exercise of stock-based compensation awards was $13.7
million, compared to $3.7 million in the prior year period. Currently the Company issues treasury
shares upon the exercise or settlement of stock-based compensation awards.
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
A summary of the changes in stock options outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2007
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Options in |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
|
millions |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
5.17 |
years |
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
11.41 |
|
|
nm |
Exercised (1) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
11.49 |
|
|
nm |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 (2) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.01 |
|
|
4.84 |
years |
|
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2007 (2) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
10.99 |
|
|
4.70 |
years |
|
|
nm=not meaningful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company received approximately $26.1 million in cash from stock option exercises in the
first six months of 2007. Options exercised during the first six months of 2007 had an intrinsic
value of approximately $30.0 million |
|
(2) |
|
At June 30, 2007, options outstanding and options vested and exercisable had aggregate
intrinsic values of $141.9 million and $120.1 million, respectively. |
A summary of the changes in stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs) outstanding during the
six months ended June 30, 2007 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
|
SARs in |
|
Average |
|
Grant Date |
|
Contractual |
|
|
millions |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Fair Value |
|
Term |
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
14.48 |
|
|
$ |
6.02 |
|
|
6.38 |
years |
Granted (1) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
21.93 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
6.99 |
years |
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs outstanding at June 30, 2007 (2) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
17.07 |
|
|
$ |
6.71 |
|
|
6.14 |
years |
|
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.44 |
|
|
$ |
6.01 |
|
|
5.87 |
years |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
SARs generally vest ratably over a four-year service period and expire in seven years. |
|
(2) |
|
At June 30, 2007, SARs outstanding had an aggregate intrinsic value of $13.6 million, and SARs
vested and exercisable had an intrinsic value of $2.9 million. |
The fair value of the Companys stock options and SARs was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model with the weighted-average assumptions in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 (1) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Expected dividend yield (2) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility (3) |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate (4) |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Expected life in years (5) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No awards were made in this period. |
|
(2) |
|
The dividend yield assumption is based on the history and expectation of the Companys dividend
payouts. Historically, Gartner has not paid dividends on its common stock. |
|
(3) |
|
Expected stock price volatility was based on both historical Gartner common stock prices and
implied volatility from publicly traded options in Gartner common stock. |
|
(4) |
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a U.S. treasury bond with a similar
maturity of the expected life of the award. |
|
(5) |
|
The expected life in years was based on the simplified calculation provided for in SAB No.
107. The simplified method determines the expected life in years based on the vesting period and
contractual terms as set forth when the award is made. |
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, and Common Stock Equivalents
The fair value of restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), and common stock equivalents
(CSEs) is determined on the date of grant based on the market price of the Companys common stock.
The fair value of these awards is recognized as compensation expense as follows: (i) restricted
stock awards generally vest based on the achievement of a market condition and are expensed on a
straight-line basis over approximately three years; (ii) service-based RSUs vest ratably over four years and are
expensed on a straight-line basis over four years; (iii) performance-based RSUs are subject to both
performance and service conditions, vest
8
ratably over four years, and are expensed on an accelerated basis as required by SFAS No. 123(R);
and (iv) CSEs vest immediately and are recorded as expense on the date of grant.
A summary of the changes in restricted stock, restricted stock units, and common stock equivalents
during the six months ended June 30, 2007, is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Common |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Restricted |
|
Average |
|
Stock |
|
Average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Grant Date |
|
Stock Units |
|
Grant Date |
|
Equivalents |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Stock |
|
Fair Value |
|
(RSUs) |
|
Fair Value |
|
(CSEs) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
511,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.81 |
|
|
|
1,521,620 |
|
|
$ |
14.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted (1), (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054,634 |
|
|
|
22.13 |
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
24.55 |
|
Vested or settled (2), (3) |
|
|
(311,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401,415 |
) |
|
|
14.16 |
|
|
|
(8,961 |
) |
|
|
24.55 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,680 |
) |
|
|
15.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2007 (3), (4) |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.30 |
|
|
|
2,142,159 |
|
|
$ |
18.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 1,054,634 RSUs included 516,243 performance-based RSUs awarded to executives and 538,391
service-based RSUs awarded to executive and non-executive staff. The performance-based RSUs are
subject to a performance condition tied to an annual increase in the Companys subscription-based
contract value for 2007. With respect to the performance condition, the 516,243 performance-based
RSUs granted represent the target amount, and the number of RSUs that will ultimately vest will be
between 0% and 200% of the target amount depending on which performance level is achieved. If the
specified minimum performance condition is not met, the performance-based RSUs will expire, and any
compensation expense already recorded will be reversed. |
|
(2) |
|
Director fees are paid to directors in CSEs. The CSEs vest immediately and are convertible into
common shares when the director leaves the Board of Directors. |
|
(3) |
|
During the second quarter of 2007, 300,000 shares of the restricted stock vested based on the
achievement of a specified market condition, and 11,000 shares vested based on the achievement of
the specified service condition. Vesting on the remaining 200,000 shares of restricted stock is
also subject to the achievement of a specified market condition, as follows: (i) 100,000 shares
vest when the Companys common stock trades at an average price of $25 or more for sixty
consecutive trading days; and (ii) 100,000 shares vest when the Companys common stock trades at an
average price of $30 or more for sixty consecutive trading days. |
|
(4) |
|
The weighted-average remaining contractual term of the RSUs is 1.98 years. The restricted stock
has no defined contractual term. |
Note 5
Segment Information
The Company manages its business in three reportable segments: Research, Consulting and Events.
Research consists primarily of subscription-based research products, access to research inquiry, as
well as peer networking services and membership programs. Consulting consists primarily of
consulting, measurement engagements, and strategic advisory services. Events consists of various
symposia, conferences, and exhibitions.
The Company evaluates reportable segment performance and allocates resources based on gross
contribution margin. Gross contribution is defined as operating income excluding certain Cost of
services and product development and selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation,
META integration charges, amortization of intangibles, and Other charges. Certain costs included in
consolidated Cost of services and product development are not allocated to segment expense,
primarily web maintenance and customer relationship database costs, and certain bonus and fringe
charges. The accounting policies used by the reportable segments are the same as those used by the
Company.
The Company does not identify or allocate assets, including capital expenditures, by operating
segment. Accordingly, assets are not reported by segment because the information is not available
and is not reviewed in the evaluation of segment performance or in making decisions in the
allocation of resources.
The following tables present information about the Companys reportable segments (in thousands).
The Other column includes certain revenues and other expenses unallocated to reportable segments,
expenses allocated to operations that do not meet the segment reporting quantitative threshold, and
other charges. There are no inter-segment revenues:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
163,753 |
|
|
$ |
83,555 |
|
|
$ |
53,005 |
|
|
$ |
3,178 |
|
|
$ |
303,491 |
|
Gross Contribution |
|
|
102,574 |
|
|
|
34,310 |
|
|
|
22,613 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
161,902 |
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
138,321 |
|
|
$ |
83,663 |
|
|
$ |
58,599 |
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
|
$ |
284,093 |
|
Gross Contribution |
|
|
83,913 |
|
|
|
37,040 |
|
|
|
26,591 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
150,405 |
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
322,553 |
|
|
$ |
159,822 |
|
|
$ |
79,932 |
|
|
$ |
5,381 |
|
|
$ |
567,688 |
|
Gross Contribution |
|
|
201,876 |
|
|
|
62,345 |
|
|
|
36,784 |
|
|
|
4,056 |
|
|
|
305,061 |
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(263,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
275,413 |
|
|
$ |
159,556 |
|
|
$ |
73,094 |
|
|
$ |
6,959 |
|
|
$ |
515,022 |
|
Gross Contribution |
|
|
168,400 |
|
|
|
70,866 |
|
|
|
33,018 |
|
|
|
5,675 |
|
|
|
277,959 |
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reporting segment, for the six months ended June
30, 2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Adjustments (1) |
|
|
2007 |
|
Research |
|
$ |
282,467 |
|
|
$ |
2,194 |
|
|
$ |
(180 |
) |
|
$ |
284,481 |
|
Consulting |
|
|
87,666 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
88,021 |
|
Events |
|
|
36,330 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
36,372 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
$ |
408,545 |
|
|
$ |
2,622 |
|
|
$ |
(211 |
) |
|
$ |
410,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company adjusted a
lease obligation (See Note 7 Other
Charges and EITF 95-3 Liabilities), resulting in a reduction of $0.2 million of recorded goodwill. |
10
The following table presents the Companys intangible assets subject to amortization (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cost |
|
$ |
7,700 |
|
|
$ |
951 |
|
|
$ |
8,651 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3,465 |
) |
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
(4,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
4,235 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
$ |
4,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cost |
|
$ |
7,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,265 |
|
|
$ |
8,965 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,695 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(2,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
5,005 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
5,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Other category includes noncompete agreements and trademarks. Amortization expense for
intangibles was $0.6 million and $3.4 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, amortization expense
for intangibles was $1.1 million and $6.8 million, respectively.
The estimated future amortization expense on purchased intangibles is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2007 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
985 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,610 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,610 |
|
2010 |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Other Charges and EITF 95-3 Liabilities
Other Charges
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded Other charges of approximately $9.1 million,
which included charges of $8.7 million related to a litigation settlement and $2.7 million related
to a restructuring. Offsetting these charges was a credit of $2.3 million related to an excess
facility.
The $8.7 million charge relates to a settlement agreement the Company entered into with Expert
Choice, Inc. and the Companys insurance carriers to settle all claims, causes of action and
disputes arising out of the litigation entitled Expert Choice, Inc. v. Gartner, Inc., U.S.
District Court, District of Connecticut, Civil Docket 3:03cv02234. The settlement agreement
provided for full and complete mutual releases among the parties, dismissal of the litigation and
resolved all disputes between the parties. The total amount of the settlement was $21.5 million, of
which $9.5 million will be paid by the Company, and an aggregate of $12.0 million will be paid by
the Companys insurers. The $8.7 million charge includes
$8.5 million for the settlement of the claim and approximately
$0.2 million of related legal expenses. The Company had previously accrued $1.0 million toward the settlement of
this claim.
The Company also recorded a restructuring charge of $2.7 million for termination costs related to
the Companys decision to exit from consulting operations in
Asia. The decision to exit APAC consulting resulted in a reduction of
39 consultants, of which 32 received termination benefits
included in the $2.7 million charge. In addition, the Company also recorded a credit of approximately $2.3 million to
reduce an accrual related to an excess facility, which was returned to service. The Company had
recorded the original accrual for this excess facility in 2002.
The Company did not record any Other charges in 2006.
11
The following table summarizes the activity related to the liability for restructuring programs
recorded as Other charges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce |
|
|
Excess |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
And Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Accrued liability at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
3,591 |
|
|
$ |
20,595 |
|
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
24,773 |
|
Currency translation and reclassifications |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(3,128 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(5,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
17,693 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
19,361 |
|
Currency translation and reclassifications |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Payments during the remainder of 2006 |
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
(2,721 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(3,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
15,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,711 |
|
Charges (a) |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,681 |
|
|
|
11,363 |
|
Currency translation and reclassifications |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
Adjustment for excess facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,280 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,280 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(1,230 |
) |
|
|
(2,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
$ |
10,131 |
|
|
$ |
8,681 |
|
|
$ |
20,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The $8.7 million charge recorded in the second quarter of 2007 includes $8.5 million for the
settlement of the claim and approximately $0.2 million of related legal expenses. The Company had
also recorded a charge of $1.0 million related to the Expert Choice claim in 2003 which was
recorded in Selling, general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations. |
The Company expects to pay the $9.5 million Expert Choice claim in August 2007 and the remaining
workforce reduction costs to be paid during 2007, while costs for excess facilities will be paid as
the leases expire, through 2011. The Company intends to fund these payments from existing cash.
EITF 95-3 Liabilities
The Company has certain liabilities recorded under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Combination (EITF 95-3) related to the
Companys purchase of META in 2005. The following table provides the activity under EITF 95-3 for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Adjustments (1) |
|
|
Payments (2) |
|
|
2007 |
|
Lease terminations |
|
$ |
3,211 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,638 |
) |
|
$ |
1,388 |
|
Costs to exit activities |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
219 |
|
Tax contingencies |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,969 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,674 |
) |
|
$ |
2,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company reduced a lease obligation due to revised
subleasing assumptions. The offset was to goodwill (see Note 6 Goodwill and Intangible Assets). |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $1.0 million and $0.7 million paid in the first and second quarters of 2007,
respectively. |
The Company expects the remaining exit costs to be paid in 2007, while the lease obligations will
be paid over their respective contract periods through 2012. The Company is uncertain at this time
regarding the timing of payment of the remaining tax contingencies.
Note 8 Debt
On January 31, 2007, the Company refinanced its existing borrowing arrangements by entering into a
five-year, $180.0 million term loan and a $300.0 million revolving credit facility which may be
increased, at Gartners option, by up to an additional $100.0 million, for a total revolving credit
facility of $400.0 million (the Credit Agreement). The term loan will be repaid in 18 consecutive
quarterly installments commencing September 30, 2007, plus a final payment due on January 31, 2012,
and may be prepaid at any time without penalty or premium at the option of Gartner. The revolving
credit facility may be used for loans, and up to $15.0 million may be used for letters of credit.
The revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until January 31, 2012, at which time
all amounts borrowed must be repaid. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be either
prime-based or Libor-based. Interest rates under these borrowings include a base rate plus a margin
between 0.00% and 0.25% on prime borrowings and between .625% and 1.25% on Libor borrowings.
Generally, the Companys borrowings are Libor-based.
12
The Company incurred approximately $1.3 million of debt issuance costs related to the
refinancing, which will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the new debt. In
addition, the Company also expensed approximately $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 related
to previously capitalized debt issuance costs.
Also on January 31, 2007, and in conjunction with the refinancing, the Company drew down $190.0
million from the revolving facility and $180.0 million from the term loan facility under the new
Credit Agreement and repaid $370.0 million outstanding under its prior borrowing arrangement, which
was terminated. In conjunction with the refinancing, the Company also terminated its existing
interest rate swap contract which resulted in a realized gain of approximately $1.2 million. In
accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), the gain was recorded in other comprehensive income and will
be amortized to interest expense.
The Company repaid $45.0 million of the revolver in the second quarter of 2007, and as of June 30,
2007, had $180.0 million outstanding on the term loan and $180.0 outstanding on the revolver. As of
June 30, 2007, the annualized interest rate on this debt was approximately 6.36%, which includes a
base rate of 5.36% plus a margin of 1.0%. The Company had approximately $117.0 million of remaining
borrowing capacity under the revolver as of June 30, 2007.
In conjunction with the refinancing, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that
hedges the base interest rate risk on the term loan. The swap effectively converts the floating
base rate on the term loan to a fixed rate. Under the swap terms, the Company pays a 5.06% fixed
rate and in return receives a three-month floating LIBOR rate. The three-month LIBOR rate on the
swap matches the base rate paid on the term loan since both use three-month LIBOR. The swap had an
initial notional value of $180.0 million which declines as payments are made on the term loan so
that the amount outstanding under the term loan and the notional amount of the swap will always be
equal. The swap had a notional amount of $180.0 million at June 30, 2007, which was the same as
the outstanding amount of the term loan. Including the impact of the interest rate swap, the
annualized effective interest rate on the term loan was approximately 5.06% as of June 30, 2007.
The Company accounts for the swap as a cash flow hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133 which
requires all derivatives, whether designated as hedges or not, to be recorded on the balance sheet
at fair value. Since the swap qualifies as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, changes in the
fair value of the swap will be recorded in other comprehensive income as long as the swap continues
to effectively hedge the base interest rate risk on the term loan. Any ineffective portion of
changes in the fair value of the hedge will be recorded in earnings. At June 30, 2007, there was no
ineffective portion of the hedge as defined under SFAS No. 133. The interest rate swap had a
positive fair value of approximately $1.4 million at June 30, 2007, which is recorded in other
comprehensive income.
Note 9 Equity and Stock Programs
In February 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a new program to repurchase up to
$200.0 million of Gartner common stock. The program replaces the $100.0 million share repurchase
program approved in October 2005. Repurchases will be made from time-to-time through open market
purchases or in privately negotiated transactions. Repurchases are subject to the availability of
stock, prevailing market conditions, the trading price of the stock, the Companys financial
performance and other conditions. Repurchases will be funded from cash flow from operations and
possible borrowings under the Companys credit arrangement. The Company repurchased 1,307,772
shares of its common stock in the first six months of 2007 under the new program at a cost of
approximately $29.7 million.
During the first six months of 2006, the Company repurchased 2,564,550 shares of its common stock
under its prior repurchase program, which included 1,000,000 shares repurchased directly from
Silver Lake Partners and affiliates.
Note 10 Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $5.4 million for the second quarter of 2007 as compared to $8.0
million for the second quarter of 2006. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2007 was
27.9% as compared to 30.6% for the second quarter of 2006. The decrease in the rate is primarily
due to the impact of certain discrete items that occurred in the second quarter of 2007 which
included the release of valuation allowances that had previously been established for net operating
losses in certain Asian countries. As a result of the Companys decision to exit from consulting
operations in Asia (see Note 7 Other Charges and EITF 95-3
Liabilities), the Company now believes that it is more likely than not that
these assets will be realized. The discrete items also included the receipt of $1.8 million of
income related to the settlement of a claim (see Note 12 Claim
Settlement). There was no tax cost associated with
the settlement. The impact of these items was offset, in part, by an increase to the effective tax
rate related to differences in the estimated mix of pre-tax income by jurisdiction.
13
In addition to the discrete items noted above, the Company also recorded a charge of $8.6 million
in the second quarter of 2007 related to a settlement agreement the Company entered into with
Expert Choice, Inc (Note 7 Other Charges and EITF 95-3 Liabilities). This item did not have a
material impact on the effective tax rate for the quarter.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 is an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, and it seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of
measurement and recognition in accounting for income taxes. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and accounting in interim periods and
requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income taxes. The cumulative
effect, if any, of applying FIN 48 is to be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings in the year of adoption.
The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation the Company
decreased its reserves for uncertain tax positions by approximately $1.4 million and decreased its
deferred tax assets by approximately $1.4 million. Because the amounts were offsetting, there was
no adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings on the balance sheet. As of the
adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $25.1 million.
Of this amount, $20.0 million would favorably affect the effective income tax rate if recognized
in future periods. It is reasonably possible that $5.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of
January 1, 2007 will reverse prior to December 31, 2007.
FIN 48 also requires companies to reclassify uncertain tax positions not expected to be settled
within one year to long term liabilities. Therefore, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
decreased by approximately $19.6 million and Other Liabilities increased by approximately $19.6
million.
Upon adoption of FIN 48, we have elected an accounting policy to classify accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our income tax provision. Previously, our policy
was to classify interest and penalties as an operating expense in arriving at pretax income. The
Company has $0.1 million of accrued interest and penalties recorded as of January 1, 2007 related
to the unrecognized tax benefits.
There have been no significant changes to the above amounts in the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The number of years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. Generally, our
statutes are open for tax years ended September 30, 1999 and forward. Our major taxing
jurisdictions include the U.S. (federal and state), the United Kingdom, Italy, Denmark, and Canada.
The Company received Examination Reports from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in October 2005
and October 2006 in connection with audits of the Companys federal income tax returns for the tax
years ended September 30, 1999 through December 31, 2004. The IRS proposed adjustments relating
primarily to the valuation of intangible assets licensed by Gartner to a foreign subsidiary and the
calculation of payments made pursuant to a cost sharing arrangement between Gartner and a foreign
subsidiary. Gartner appealed the initial findings and has reached a settlement on the issues with
the IRS Appeals Office. With respect to the audits, the Company had recorded provisions in prior
periods based on estimates of the amount for which the claim would be settled. Based on the
outcome of our negotiations, we released reserves and recorded a benefit of $1.5 million in 2006.
The Company has considered the impact of the adoption of FIN 48 on the settlement of the IRS
examination and there is no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Note 11 Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company has defined-benefit pension plans in several of its international locations. Benefits
paid under these plans are based on years of service and level of employee compensation. The
Company accounts for material defined benefit plans in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, as amended (SFAS No. 87).
None of these plans have plan assets as defined under SFAS No. 87.
Net periodic pension expense was $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the second quarters of 2007 and
2006, respectively, and $1.4 million and $1.5 million for the first six months of 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Note 12 Claim Settlement
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company received cash proceeds of $1.8 million related to the
settlement of a claim. The $1.8 million was recorded as a gain in Other expense, net in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
14
Note 13 Contingencies
We are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We
believe that the potential liability, if any, in excess of amounts already accrued from all
proceedings, claims and litigation will not have a material effect on our financial position or
results of operations when resolved in a future period.
The Company has various agreements that may obligate us to indemnify the other party with respect
to certain matters. Generally, these indemnification clauses are included in contracts arising in
the normal course of business under which we customarily agree to hold the other party harmless
against losses arising from a breach of representations related to such matters as title to assets
sold and licensed or certain intellectual property rights. It is not possible to predict the
maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements due to the
conditional nature of the Companys obligations and the unique facts of each particular agreement.
Historically, payments made by us under these agreements have not been material. As of June 30,
2007, we did not have any indemnification agreements that would require material payments.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The purpose of the following Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is to help facilitate
the understanding of significant factors influencing the operating results, financial condition and
cash flows of Gartner, Inc. Additionally, the MD&A also conveys our expectations of the potential
impact of known trends, events or uncertainties that may impact future results. You should read
this discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006. Historical results and percentage relationships are not necessarily indicative of operating
results for future periods.
References to the Company, we, our, and us are to Gartner, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are any statements other
than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our expectations, beliefs,
hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements can
be identified by the use of words such as may, will, expects, should, believes, plans,
anticipates, estimates, predicts, potential, continue, or other words of similar meaning.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements.
Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in
Factors That May Affect Future Performance and elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Readers should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements opinion only as of the date on which they
were made. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances as they occur. Readers also should
review carefully any risk factors described in other reports filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
OVERVIEW
Gartner, Inc. is a leading research and advisory firm that helps executives use technology to
build, guide and grow their enterprises. We offer independent and objective research and analysis
on the information technology, computer hardware, software, communications and related technology
industries. We provide comprehensive coverage of the IT industry to approximately 10,000 client
organizations, including approximately 400 Fortune 500 companies, across 75 countries. Our client
base consists primarily of CIOs and other senior IT and business executives from a wide variety of
enterprises, government agencies and the investment community.
We employ a diversified business model that utilizes and leverages the breadth and depth of our
research intellectual capital while enabling us to maintain and grow our market-leading position
and brand franchise. The foundation for our business model is our ability to create and distribute
our unique, proprietary research content as broadly as possible via:
|
|
|
published reports and briefings, |
|
|
|
|
consulting and advisory services, and |
|
|
|
|
hosting symposia, conferences and exhibitions. |
In early 2005, we undertook an initiative to better utilize the intellectual capital associated
with our core research product. Our diversified business model provides multiple entry points and
synergies that facilitate increased client spending on our research, consulting and events. A
critical part of our long-term strategy is to increase business volume with our most valuable
clients, identifying relationships with the greatest sales potential and expanding those
relationships by offering strategically relevant research and analysis. We also seek to extend the
Gartner brand name to develop new client relationships, and augment our
15
sales capacity and expand into new markets around the world. In addition, we seek to increase our
revenue and operating cash flow through more effective pricing of our products and services. These
initiatives have created additional revenue streams through more effective packaging, campaigning
and cross-selling of our products and services.
We intend to maintain a balance between (1) pursuing opportunities and applying resources with a
strict focus on growing our three core businesses and (2) generating profitability through a
streamlined cost structure.
We have three business segments: Research, Consulting and Events.
|
|
Research provides insight for CIOs, IT professionals, technology companies and the investment community through reports
and briefings, access to our analysts, as well as peer networking services and membership programs designed
specifically for CIOs and other senior executives. |
|
|
|
Consulting consists primarily of consulting, measurement engagements and strategic advisory services (paid one-day
analyst engagements) (SAS), which provide assessments of cost, performance, efficiency and quality focused on the IT
industry. |
|
|
|
Events consists of various symposia, conferences and exhibitions focused on the IT industry. |
We believe the following business measurements are important performance indicators for our
business segments:
|
|
|
BUSINESS SEGMENT |
|
BUSINESS MEASUREMENTS |
|
|
Research
|
|
Contract value represents the value attributable to all of our
subscription-related research products that recognize revenue on a ratable
basis. Contract value is calculated as the annualized value of all subscription
research contracts in effect at a specific point in time, without regard to the
duration of the contract. |
|
|
|
Client retention rate represents a measure of client satisfaction and renewed
business relationships at a specific point in time. Client retention is
calculated on a percentage basis by dividing our current clients, who were also
clients a year ago, by all clients from a year ago. |
|
|
|
Wallet retention rate represents a measure of the amount of contract value we
have retained with clients over a twelve-month period. Wallet retention is
calculated on a percentage basis by dividing the contract value of clients, who
were clients one year earlier, by the total contract value from a year earlier.
When wallet retention exceeds client retention, it is an indication of
retention of higher-spending clients, or increased spending by retained
clients, or both. |
|
|
|
Number of executive program members represents the number of paid participants
in executive programs. |
|
|
|
Consulting
|
|
Consulting backlog represents future revenue to be derived from in-process
consulting, measurement and strategic advisory services engagements. |
|
|
|
Utilization rates represent a measure of productivity of our consultants.
Utilization rates are calculated for billable headcount on a percentage basis
by dividing total hours billed by total hours available to bill. |
|
|
|
Billing Rate represents earned billable revenue divided by total billable hours.
|
|
|
|
Average annualized revenue per billable headcount represents a measure of the
revenue generating ability of an average billable consultant and is calculated
periodically by multiplying the average billing rate per hour times the
utilization percentage times the billable hours available for one year. |
|
|
|
Events
|
|
Number of events represents the total number of hosted events completed during
the period. |
|
|
|
Number of attendees represents the number of people who attend events. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL POSITION
We had net income of $14.0 million in the second quarter of 2007, or $0.13 per diluted share,
compared to $0.20 per diluted share for the prior year period. Net income and diluted earnings per
share for the second quarter of 2007 include net pre-tax charges and non-operating items of
approximately $7.2 million, or about $(0.04) per share, net of tax. Among these items was a charge
related to the settlement of previously disclosed litigation involving Expert Choice, Inc.
16
We continue to focus on executing our strategy of investing in our sales capability, and our sales
force of 765 associates is up approximately 25% over the prior year quarter, and we have added 102
sales associates through June 30, 2007. The Research segment continues to benefit strongly from
this continued investment in our sales force, with revenue up 18% in the second quarter of 2007, to
$163.8 million, and is up 17% year-over-year. Contract value at June 30, 2007 was $683.0 million,
up 19% from June 30, 2006, and was up 15% excluding the impact of foreign currency. The $683.0
million of contract value represents a new record level for Gartner, reflecting the successful
execution of our strategy to accelerate the growth of our research business by productively growing
our sales force. Both our research client retention rate and wallet retention rate remained strong
at 82% and 103%, respectively.
Revenue from our Consulting segment was $83.6 million in the second quarter of 2007, compared to
$83.7 million in the prior year quarter. Consulting backlog at June 30, 2007 was $108.8 million,
which is up about 9% from June 30, 2006. While our revenue was basically flat, our key metrics
continued to improve in the quarter. The consultant utilization rate increased 6 points, to 73% in
the current quarter from 67% in the second quarter of 2006, reflecting improved engagement
management. While the average hourly billing rate was down slightly
from the prior year quarter, the average annualized revenue per billable
headcount was up from the prior year. Billable headcount was 487 at June 30, 2007, which is down
about 5% year-over-year, primarily due to the exit from Asia discussed above.
Our Events business strategy is to continue to focus on managing the Events portfolio by retaining
successful events and introducing promising new events that will yield greater profitability.
Events revenue for the second quarter of 2007 as compared to the prior year was impacted by a shift
in our events schedule. Four events that were held in the first quarter of 2007 were held in the
second quarter in 2006. As a result, we held 27 events in the second quarter of 2007 and 33 in the
prior year period and revenue was down 10% year-over-year. Adjusted for this shift in our events
calendar, quarterly revenue was up approximately 2%. We held 39 events in both the first half of
2007 and 2006, and our year-over-year events revenue was up 9%.
We also continue to focus on enhancing shareholder value through the continued evolution of our
capital structure. In the first half of 2007 we closed on a new credit facility which increased our
total debt capacity to $480.0 million, and our Board of Directors approved a new $200.0 million
share buyback program. We repurchased 1.3 million shares in the first half of 2007 under this
program. We ended the quarter with $102.8 million of cash
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements requires the application of appropriate accounting policies
and the use of estimates. The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical
to an understanding of Gartners financial statements because their application requires
significant management judgments and estimates. Specific risks for these critical accounting
policies are described below.
Revenue recognition We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, and SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Revenue
by significant source is accounted for as follows:
|
|
Research revenues are derived from subscription contracts for research products. Revenues from research products
are deferred and recognized ratably over the applicable contract term; |
|
|
|
Consulting revenues are generated from fixed fee and time and material engagements. Revenue from fixed fee
contracts is recognized on a percentage of completion basis. Revenues from time and materials engagements is
recognized as work is delivered and/or services are provided; |
|
|
|
Events revenues are deferred and recognized upon the completion of the related symposium, conference or exhibition; |
|
|
|
Other revenues consist primarily of fees from research reprints and software licensing. Reprint fees are
recognized when the reprint is shipped. Fees from software licensing are recognized when a signed non-cancelable
software license exists, delivery has occurred, collection is probable, and the fees are fixed or determinable. |
The majority of research contracts are billable upon signing, absent special terms granted on a
limited basis from time to time. All research contracts are non-cancelable and non-refundable,
except for government contracts that have a 30-day cancellation clause, but have not produced
material cancellations to date. It is our policy to record the entire amount of the contract that
is billable as a fee receivable at the time the contract is signed with a corresponding amount as
deferred revenue, since the contract represents a legally enforceable claim. For those government
contracts that permit termination, we bill the client the full amount billable under the contract
but only record a receivable equal to the earned portion of the contract. In addition, we
17
only record deferred revenue on these government contracts when cash is received. Deferred revenues
attributable to government contracts were $45.3 million and $47.9 million at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. As regards government contracts
that permit termination, at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company
had not recognized uncollected receivables or deferred revenues of $8.2 million and $9.6 million, respectively.
Uncollectible fees receivable The allowance for losses is composed of a bad debt and a sales and
allowance reserve. Provisions are charged against earnings. The measurement of likely and probable
losses and the allowance for uncollectible fees receivable is based on historical loss experience,
aging of outstanding receivables, an assessment of current economic conditions and the financial
health of specific clients. This evaluation is inherently judgmental and requires material
estimates. These valuation reserves are periodically re-evaluated and adjusted as more information
about the ultimate collectibility of fees receivable becomes available. Circumstances that could
cause our valuation reserves to increase include changes in our clients liquidity and credit
quality, other factors negatively impacting our clients ability to pay their obligations as they
come due, and the effectiveness of our collection efforts. Trade receivables at June 30, 2007 were
$303.5 million, which is net of an allowance for losses of approximately $7.8 million. Trade
receivables at December 31, 2006 were $328.4 million, net of an allowance for losses of
approximately $8.7 million.
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets The evaluation of goodwill is performed in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. This standard requires ongoing annual assessments of goodwill impairment. The evaluation
of other intangible assets is performed on a periodic basis. These assessments require management
to estimate the fair value of our reporting units based on estimates of future business operations
and market and economic conditions in developing long-term forecasts. If we determine that the fair
value of any reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we must recognize an impairment
charge, for the associated goodwill of that reporting unit, to earnings in our financial
statements. The amount of the impairment is based upon the implied fair value of the reporting unit
compared to the carrying amount of goodwill. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at least
annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not
be recoverable. Factors we consider important that could trigger a review for impairment include
the following: significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating
results, significant changes in the manner of our use of acquired assets or the strategy for our
overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, significant decline in our
stock price for a sustained period, and our market capitalization relative to net book value.
Due to the numerous variables associated with our judgments and assumptions relating to the
valuation of the reporting units and the effects of changes in circumstances affecting these
valuations, both the precision and reliability of the resulting estimates are subject to
uncertainty, and as additional information becomes known, we may change our estimates.
Accounting for income taxes As we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we estimate our
income taxes in each of the jurisdictions where we operate. This process involves estimating our
current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets
and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when future realization is in question. We consider the
availability of loss carryovers, existing deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income and
ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation
allowance. In the event we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in
the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would
increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should we determine that we
would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment
to the deferred tax asset would be charged against income in the period such determination was
made.
We operate in numerous foreign taxing jurisdictions and our level of operations and profitability
in each jurisdiction could have an impact upon the amount of income taxes that we provide in any
given year. In addition, our tax filings for various tax years are subject to audit by the tax
authorities in jurisdictions where we conduct business. These audits may result in assessments of
additional taxes. We have provided for the amounts we believe will ultimately result from these
audits. However, resolution of these matters involves uncertainties and there are no assurances
that the ultimate resolution will not exceed the amounts provided.
Accounting for stock-based compensation We account for awards of stock-based compensation in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No,
123(R)), as interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107). In accordance
with SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense, which is based on
the fair value of the award on the date of grant, over the related service period, net of estimated
forfeitures (see Note 4 Stock-Based Compensation in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements).
18
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock compensation
awards requires the input of certain highly complex and subjective assumptions, including the
expected life of the stock compensation awards and the Companys common stock price volatility. In
addition, determining the appropriate amount of associated periodic expense requires management to
estimate the rate of employee forfeitures and for some awards, the likelihood of achievement of
certain performance targets. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock
compensation awards and the associated periodic expense represent managements best estimates, but
these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of judgment. As a result, if
factors change and the Company deems it necessary in the future to modify the assumptions it made
or to use different assumptions, or if the quantity and nature of the Companys stock-based
compensation awards changes, then the amount of expense may need to be adjusted and future stock
compensation expense could be materially different from what has been recorded in the current
period.
Contingencies and other loss reserves and accruals We may record accruals for severance costs,
lease costs associated with excess facilities, contract terminations and asset impairments as a
result of actions we undertake to streamline our organization, reposition certain businesses and
reduce ongoing costs. Estimates of costs to be incurred to complete these actions, such as future
lease payments, sublease income, the fair value of assets, and severance and related benefits, are
based on assumptions at the time the actions are initiated. To the extent actual costs differ from
those estimates, reserve levels may need to be adjusted against earnings. In addition, these
actions may be revised due to changes in business conditions that we did not foresee at the time
such plans were approved. Additionally, we record accruals for estimated incentive compensation
costs during each year. Amounts accrued at the end of each reporting period are based on our
estimates and may require adjustment as the ultimate amount paid associated with these incentives
are sometimes not known until after year-end.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overall Results
Total revenues increased 7% in the second quarter of 2007, to $303.5 million compared to
$284.1 million for the second quarter of 2006, and increased $52.7 million, or 10%, when comparing
the first six months of 2007 to the first six months of 2006, to $567.7 million from $515.0
million. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation, revenues for the second quarter and
year-to-date 2007 would have increased 4% and 8%, respectively. Please refer to the section of this
MD&A entitled Segment Results for a further discussion of revenues by segment.
Cost of services and product development increased $6.9 million, or 5%, to $144.2 million
in the second quarter of 2007 from $137.3 million in the second quarter of 2006, and increased
$25.3 million, or 10%, when comparing the first six months of 2007 with the first six months of
2006, to $267.9 million from $242.6 million. Excluding the effects of foreign currency translation,
cost of services and product development would have increased 2% and 7%, respectively. Cost of
services and product development increased 5% for the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to the
impact of foreign exchange, which added $4.0 million of expense, merit salary increases, and
additional charges for stock-based compensation expense under SFAS No. 123(R). As a percentage of
sales, cost of services and product development was 48% for both the second quarter of 2007 and
2006.
Cost of services and product development increased 10%, or $25.3 million, for the first six months
of 2007 compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the impact of foreign
currency, which added about $10.3 million of expense, approximately $6.6 million of merit salary
increases, $4.0 million of higher event fulfillment costs driven by higher events revenue, and
additional stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R) of about $2.0 million. For the first six
months of 2007 and 2006, cost of services and product development as a percentage of sales was 47%
for both periods.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $13.8 million, or 13%, to $120.5
million in the second quarter of 2007 from $106.7 million in the second quarter of 2006. SG&A
expenses increased $30.1 million, or 15% to $236.3 million from $206.2 million when comparing the
first six months of 2007 to the first six months of 2006. Excluding the effects of foreign
currency translation, SG&A expense would have increased by 10%
and 12% for the quarter and
year-over-year periods, respectively. The increase in SG&A expenses on a year-to-date and
quarterly basis resulted primarily from increased investment in our sales organization. We now have
765 quota-bearing sales associates, a 25% increase over the prior year, with 49 added in the second
quarter of 2007 and 102 added in the first half of 2007.
In addition to higher compensation costs related to the increased sales headcount, SG&A expense was
up on a quarter and year-to-date basis due to the impact of foreign exchange, which added $3.0
million and $5.6 million of expense, respectively. We had increased recruiting and relocation
expenses related to the increased sales headcount, as well as $2.5 million and $4.3 million of
additional charges for stock-based compensation under SFAS 123(R) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.
19
Depreciation expense for the second quarter of 2007 decreased slightly, to $6.0 million,
compared to $6.1 million for the second quarter 2006 and was $11.7 million for the first six months
of 2007 and 2006.
Amortization of intangibles was $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 compared to
$3.4 million in the prior year quarter. Amortization of intangibles during the first six months of
2007 was $1.1 million compared to $6.8 million in the prior year period. Both of the decreases were
due to certain intangibles becoming fully amortized.
meta integration charges were zero in 2007 and zero and $1.5 million for the
three and six months ending June 30, 2006, respectively. These expenses related primarily to
severance, and for consulting, accounting, and tax services.
other
charges in the three and six months ending June 30, 2007 were approximately $9.1
million, which included charges of $8.7 million related to the Expert Choice litigation settlement
and $2.7 million of restructuring costs related to the Companys exit from consulting operations in
Asia. Offsetting these charges was a credit of $2.3 million related to an excess facility which the
Company returned to service. Other charges were zero for the three and six months ended June 30,
2006.
interest
expense, net was $5.4 million and $4.5 million for the three months ended June
30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $11.7 million and $8.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in our interest expense was primarily due to
approximately $144.0 million and $139.0 million of additional weighted-average debt outstanding in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in the
prior year, respectively. The additional interest expense resulting from higher average amounts of
debt outstanding was partially offset by a slight decline in rates. For the first six months of
2007, we also had $0.5 million of additional interest expense related to the amortization and
write-off of debt issuance costs from our debt refinancing in early 2007.
other
income (expense), net for the second quarter and first six months of 2007 was $1.8
million, due to a gain from settlement of a claim for $1.8 million. For the second quarter and
first six months of 2006, Other income (expense), net consisted primarily of net foreign currency
exchange gains and losses.
provision
for income taxes was $5.4 million for the second quarter of 2007 as compared to $8.0
million for the second quarter of 2006. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2007 was
27.9% as compared to 30.6% for the second quarter of 2006. The decrease in the rate is primarily
due to the impact of certain discrete items that occurred in the second quarter of 2007 which
included the release of valuation allowances that had previously been established for net operating
losses in certain Asian countries. As a result of the Companys decision to exit from consulting
operations in Asia, the Company now believes that it is more likely than not that these assets will
be realized. The discrete items also included the receipt of $1.8 million of income related to the
settlement of a claim. There was no tax cost associated with the settlement. The impact of these
items was offset, in part, by an increase to the effective tax rate related to differences in the
estimated mix of pre-tax income by jurisdiction.
In
addition to the discrete items noted above, the Company also recorded a charge of $8.7 million
in the second quarter of 2007 related to a settlement agreement the Company entered into with
Expert Choice, Inc. This item did not have a material impact on the effective tax rate for the
quarter.
SEGMENT RESULTS
We evaluate reportable segment performance and allocate resources based on gross contribution
margin. Gross contribution is defined as operating income excluding certain Cost of services and
product development, and Selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation, META
integration charges, amortization of intangibles and Other charges. Gross contribution margin is
defined as gross contribution as a percentage of revenues.
Research
Revenue in our Research business was up 18% in the second quarter of 2007, to $163.8 million, from
$138.3 million in the second quarter of 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, Research
revenues increased $47.1 million or 17%, to $322.5 million compared to $275.4 million for the same
period of 2006. For both the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2007 we had growth across
our entire product portfolio. Excluding the impact of foreign currency, revenue was up about 16%
and 15% over the prior year quarter and year-to-date periods, respectively.
Research gross contribution of $102.6 million for the second quarter of 2007 increased 22% from
$83.9 million for the second quarter of 2006, while gross contribution margin for the second
quarter of 2007 increased 2 points, to 63% from 61% in the
20
prior year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, gross contribution increased to $201.9
million, from $168.4 million in the comparable prior year period, a 20% increase, while the
contribution margin increased 2 points, to 63% from 61%. The quarter and year-over-year
contribution margin improved due to operating leverage from our stronger revenue performance.
At June 30, 2007, contract value was $683.0 million, up 19% from $574.4 million at June 30, 2006,
driven by increases in both core research and Executive Programs. Adjusted for the impact of
foreign currency translation, contract value was up about 15% year-over-year. At June 30, 2007, our
research client retention rate remained strong, at 82%, and was up from 80% at June 30, 2006.
Wallet retention was 103% at June 30, 2007, up from 90% at June 30, 2006. Our Executive Program
membership was 3,605 at June 30, 2007, which is up about 4% compared to the 3,451 members at June
30, 2006.
Consulting
Consulting
revenues were $83.6 million and $159.8 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007,
compared to $83.7 million and $159.6 million for the same periods in the prior year. Excluding the
favorable impact of foreign currency translation, revenues for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 were down 3% for both periods, primarily driven by lower SAS revenue and lower billable
headcount. Billable headcount was 487 at June 30, 2007, compared to 513 at June 30, 2006, a 5%
decrease. The reduced billable headcount reflects our decision to exit our consulting business in
Asia.
Consulting gross contribution of $34.3 million for the second quarter of 2007 decreased 7%, from
$37.0 million for the second quarter of 2006, while contribution margin for the second quarter of
2007 decreased to 41% from 44% in the prior year quarter. Gross contribution of $62.3 million for the first six months of 2007 decreased 12%, from $70.9
million for the same period of 2006, while contribution margin decreased to 39% in 2007 from 44% in
the prior year period.
The decrease in gross contribution and gross contribution margin for both the quarter and
year-to-date periods was driven by lower SAS revenue performance, as well as approximately $2.0
million and $5.0 million, respectively, of higher quarterly and year-to-date costs related to
additional investment in senior level resources.
The
consultant utilization rate was 73% and 70% for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2007, respectively, compared to 67% for both the same periods in the prior year. The billing rate
remained above $350 per hour for both the second quarter of 2007 and first six months of 2007. Our
average annualized revenue per billable headcount was approximately $430,000 for the first half of
2007, approximately the same as the prior year period, but was over $450,000 for the second quarter
of 2007 compared to approximately $409,000 in the prior year quarter. Consulting backlog, which
represents future revenues to be recognized from in-process consulting, measurement and SAS, was
$108.8 million compared to $100.0 million at June 30, 2006.
Events
Events revenues during the second quarter of 2007 were down 10%, declining to $53.0 million from
$58.6 million in the prior year quarter, which was primarily due to timing, as four on-going events
that were held in the second quarter of 2006 were held in 2007 in the first quarter. In total, we
held 27 events in the second quarter of 2007 compared to 33 in the prior year. Adjusted for the
impact of events timing, revenue was up approximately 2% year-over-year. Foreign exchange had an
immaterial impact on revenue. Attendance at events was 12,842 for the three month period ended June
30, 2007, compared to 13,905 in the comparable prior year period, an 8% decrease, reflecting the
shift in the events calendar. Adjusted for the timing of events, attendance was up 11%
year-over-year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, Events revenues increased 9%, or $6.8 million, to $79.9
million compared to $73.1 million for the same period of 2006, with 39 events held in both periods.
The increased revenue was primarily due to the addition of two new events in 2007 and an increase
in both attendee volume and ticket prices. The impact of foreign currency translation was
immaterial. Attendance at events was 20,234 for the six month period
ended June 30, 2007, compared
to 18,131 in the comparable prior year period, a 12% increase.
Gross
contribution was $22.6 million, or 43% of revenues, for the second quarter of 2007, compared
to $26.6 million, or 45% of revenues, for the second quarter of
2006. The 2 point decrease in gross
contribution margin was mainly due to the timing shift and some softness in our Vision events.
Gross contribution of $36.8 million for the first six months of 2007 increased from $33.0 million
compared to 2006, and gross contribution margin increased by 1 point, to 46% from 45%.
21
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $43.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007,
compared to cash provided of $33.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, a $10.7 million
increase. The increase in cash flow from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in
cash from our core operations and lower cash payments for severance and other charges.
Cash used in investing activities was $12.4 million for the six months ended June 20, 2007,
compared to $8.2 million in the prior year period. The increase was due to a year-over-year
increase in capital expenditures.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007,
compared to cash used of $28.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006, a decrease of $29.4
million in cash used. The decrease was due to several reasons, including an increase in excess tax
benefits from stock compensation, less cash used for share repurchases and debt repayments, and
higher proceeds from option exercises.
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation increased approximately $10.0 million, to $13.7 million
in the first six months of 2007 compared to $3.7 million in the same period of 2006. We decreased
our use of cash to repurchase shares by $7.3 million, as we repurchased $29.7 million of our common
stock in the first six months of 2007 compared to $37.0 million in the prior year period. On a net
basis, we repaid $10.0 million of debt in the first six months of 2007 compared to $16.7 million
for the same period in 2006, a $6.7 million decrease. We received proceeds from stock issued for
stock plans and our employee stock purchase plan of $27.5 million in the six months ended June 30,
2007, compared to $22.0 million in 2006, a $5.5 million increase.
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The Company has entered into a settlement agreement in which it is required to pay $9.5 million
(see Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings, for additional information). The Company anticipates that
the $9.5 million will be paid in August 2007.
We have a Credit Agreement that provides for a five-year, $180.0 million term loan and a $300.0
million revolving credit facility, which may be increased, at Gartners option, by up to an
additional $100.0 million, for a total revolving credit facility of $400.0 million. The term loan
will be repaid in 18 consecutive quarterly installments commencing September 30, 2007, plus a final
payment due on January 31, 2012, and may be prepaid at any time without penalty or premium at the
option of Gartner. The revolving credit facility may be used for loans, and up to $15.0 million may
be used for letters of credit. The revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until
January 31, 2012, at which time all amounts borrowed must be repaid. We had a total of $360.0
million outstanding under this borrowing arrangement as of June 30, 2007.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Through June 30, 2007, we have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions
with unconsolidated entities or other persons.
BUSINESS AND TRENDS
Our quarterly and annual revenue, operating income, and cash flow fluctuate as a result of many
factors, including the timing of the execution of research contracts, the timing of Symposia and
other events, as well as the extent of completion of consulting engagements, the amount of new
business generated, the mix of domestic and international business, changes in market demand for
our products and services, the timing of the development, introduction and marketing of new
products and services, and competition in the industry. The potential fluctuations in our operating
income could cause period-to-period comparisons of operating results not to be meaningful and could
provide an unreliable indication of future operating results.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE PERFORMANCE
We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and
uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, we and our clients are affected
by the economy. A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under
Risk Factors contained in Item 1A. of our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated
herein by reference.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and
expands disclosures about fair value
22
measurements. The statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for Gartner beginning in 2008. The Company
is in the process of evaluating the impact, if any, SFAS No. 157 will have on the Companys
financial position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilitiesincluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). This
standard permits an entity to choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at
fair value. The fair value option permits a company to choose to measure eligible items at fair
value at specified election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses on items for
which the fair value option has been elected in earnings after adoption. SFAS No. 159 will be
effective for Gartner beginning in 2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact, if
any, SFAS No. 159 will have on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2007, we have exposure to changes in interest rates since we had $180.0 million
outstanding on our term loan and $180.0 million outstanding on our revolver, both of which are
floating rate. Borrowings may be either prime-based or Libor-based. Interest rates under these
borrowings include a base rate plus a margin between 0.00% and 0.25% on prime borrowings and
between .625% and 1.25% on Libor borrowings.
We have an interest rate swap contract which effectively converts the base floating interest rate
on the term loan to a fixed rate. Accordingly, the base interest rate on the term loan is
effectively capped at 5.06%. However, we are still exposed to interest rate risk on the revolver. A
25 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would change pre-tax annual interest expense
on the revolver by approximately $0.7 million when fully utilized.
Investment Risk
None.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We face two risks related to foreign currency exchange: translation risk and transaction risk.
Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates
in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the stockholders equity section of
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay
expenses in currencies other than the United States dollar. Since the functional currencies of our
foreign operations are generally denominated in the local currency of our subsidiaries, the foreign
currency translation adjustments are reflected as a component of stockholders equity and do not
impact operating results. Revenues and expenses in foreign currencies translate into higher or
lower revenues and expenses in U.S. dollars as the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens against other
currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may negatively affect our consolidated revenues
and expenses (as expressed in U.S. dollars) from foreign operations.
We are exposed to foreign currency transaction risk since we enter into foreign currency forward
exchange contracts to offset the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates. These instruments are typically short term and are reflected at fair value with unrealized
and realized gains and losses recorded in earnings. At June 30, 2007, we had seven foreign
currency forward contracts outstanding with a total notional amount of approximately $48.0 million
and an immaterial net unrealized loss. All of these contracts expired by the end of July 2007.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the
information we are required to disclose in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.
Specifically, these controls and procedures ensure that the information is accumulated and
communicated to our executive management team, including our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
23
Management conducted an evaluation, as of June 30, 2007, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, under the supervision and with the
participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon that
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to
material Company information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Act.
In addition, there have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company has entered into a settlement agreement with Expert Choice, Inc. and the Companys
insurance carriers to settle all claims, causes of action and disputes arising out of the
litigation entitled Expert Choice, Inc. v. Gartner, Inc., U.S. District Court, District of
Connecticut, Civil Docket 3:03cv02234. The settlement agreement provided for full and complete
mutual releases among the parties, dismissal of the litigation and resolved all disputes between
the parties. The total amount of the settlement was $21.5 million, of which $9.5 million will be
paid by the Company, and an aggregate of $12.0 million will be paid by the Companys insurers.
In addition to the matter discussed above, we are involved in legal proceedings and litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the potential liability, if any, in
excess of amounts already accrued from all proceedings, claims and litigation will not have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations when resolved in a future
period.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under Risk Factors
contained in Item 1A. of our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by this report.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We have a $200.0 million common share repurchase program. The following table provides detail
related to repurchases of our common stock for treasury in 2007 under this program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
may yet be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under our |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Program |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
(inthousands) |
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
February |
|
|
639,300 |
|
|
|
21.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
417,000 |
|
|
|
21.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,056,300 |
|
|
$ |
21.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April |
|
|
450 |
|
|
$ |
25.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
May |
|
|
250,850 |
|
|
|
26.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
June |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
26.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
251,500 |
|
|
$ |
26.59 |
|
|
$ |
170.3 |
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Gartner, Inc. was held on June 5, 2007. A total of
91,957,517 shares of the Companys Common Stock were present or represented by proxy at the
meeting. This represented 88.39% of the Companys shares outstanding. The following matters were
voted on and approved:
25
1. Proposal 1 Election of Directors to a one year term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
Michael J. Bingle |
|
|
70,930,911 |
|
|
|
21,026,604 |
|
Richard J. Bressler |
|
|
86,300,895 |
|
|
|
5,656,620 |
|
Russell P. Fradin |
|
|
86,311,420 |
|
|
|
5,646,095 |
|
Anne Sutherland Fuchs |
|
|
86,302,343 |
|
|
|
5,655,172 |
|
William O. Grabe |
|
|
71,036,622 |
|
|
|
20,920,893 |
|
Eugene A. Hall |
|
|
75,572,508 |
|
|
|
16,385,007 |
|
Max D. Hopper |
|
|
66,351,572 |
|
|
|
25,605,943 |
|
John R. Joyce |
|
|
65,586,479 |
|
|
|
26,371,036 |
|
Stephen G. Pagliuca |
|
|
66,158,055 |
|
|
|
25,799,460 |
|
James C. Smith |
|
|
86,275,820 |
|
|
|
5,681,695 |
|
Jeffrey W. Ubben |
|
|
70,968,824 |
|
|
|
20.998,691 |
|
2. Proposal 2 Approval of Executive Performance Bonus Plan: 66,984,855 for, 12,860,305 against,
4,869,691 abstain, and 7,242,666 broker non-vote.
3.
Proposal 3 Ratify Selection of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2007: 91,771,373 for, 150,318 against, and 35,824 abstain.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of chief executive officer under Rule 13a 14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of chief financial officer under Rule 13a 14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
Items 3 and 5 of Part II are not applicable and have been omitted.
26
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gartner, Inc.
|
|
Date July 31, 2007 |
/s/ Christopher Lafond
|
|
|
Christopher Lafond |
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
27