e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2009
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number 0-8408
WOODWARD GOVERNOR
COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
36-1984010
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
80525
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(970)
482-5811
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class:
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered:
|
Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated
filer. See definitions of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 20, 2009, 67,926,896 shares of the common
stock with a par value of $0.001455 per share were outstanding.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
WOODWARD
GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
386,193
|
|
|
$
|
329,847
|
|
|
$
|
1,065,598
|
|
|
$
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
287,094
|
|
|
|
231,955
|
|
|
|
766,919
|
|
|
|
633,162
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
33,182
|
|
|
|
28,434
|
|
|
|
94,735
|
|
|
|
86,081
|
|
Research and developments costs
|
|
|
20,676
|
|
|
|
18,994
|
|
|
|
58,556
|
|
|
|
53,401
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,286
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
18,169
|
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10,886
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
24,130
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(902
|
)
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
359,500
|
|
|
|
280,751
|
|
|
|
975,979
|
|
|
|
776,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
26,693
|
|
|
|
49,096
|
|
|
|
89,619
|
|
|
|
131,232
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
(16,682
|
)
|
|
|
(19,084
|
)
|
|
|
(43,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
24,997
|
|
|
$
|
32,414
|
|
|
$
|
70,535
|
|
|
$
|
87,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
67,805
|
|
|
|
67,245
|
|
|
|
67,762
|
|
|
|
67,590
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
68,950
|
|
|
|
69,183
|
|
|
|
69,005
|
|
|
|
69,586
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
0.060
|
|
|
$
|
0.060
|
|
|
$
|
0.180
|
|
|
$
|
0.175
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
3
WOODWARD
GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
67,556
|
|
|
$
|
109,833
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $2,680 and
$1,648, respectively
|
|
|
233,650
|
|
|
|
178,128
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
340,631
|
|
|
|
208,317
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
33,859
|
|
|
|
25,128
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
|
|
16,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
701,991
|
|
|
|
538,055
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
214,521
|
|
|
|
168,651
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
469,566
|
|
|
|
139,577
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
350,985
|
|
|
|
66,106
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
15,534
|
|
|
|
8,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,757,888
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,031
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
42,926
|
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
82,154
|
|
|
|
65,427
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
117,228
|
|
|
|
85,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
285,308
|
|
|
|
168,844
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
606,978
|
|
|
|
33,337
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
94,845
|
|
|
|
27,513
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
80,678
|
|
|
|
67,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,067,809
|
|
|
|
297,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 4, 14, and 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.003 per share, 10,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share, 150,000 shares
authorized, 72,960 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
72,741
|
|
|
|
68,520
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
16,183
|
|
|
|
20,319
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
4,944
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
721,768
|
|
|
|
663,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815,742
|
|
|
|
757,670
|
|
Less: Treasury stock at cost, 5,043 shares and
5,261 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(120,719
|
)
|
|
|
(122,759
|
)
|
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, at average cost,
397 shares and 404 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(4,944
|
)
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
690,079
|
|
|
|
629,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,757,888
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
WOODWARD
GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
70,535
|
|
|
$
|
87,453
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
46,066
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
|
Net loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(9,555
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
16,777
|
|
|
|
7,898
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,120
|
|
|
|
(8,190
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
22,345
|
|
|
|
(37,966
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(48,146
|
)
|
|
|
(7,592
|
)
|
Current income taxes
|
|
|
(4,564
|
)
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(8,950
|
)
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
115,158
|
|
|
|
85,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchase of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(17,915
|
)
|
|
|
(24,517
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of assets
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
Business acquisitions
|
|
|
(749,844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(763,421
|
)
|
|
|
(23,654
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(12,209
|
)
|
|
|
(11,829
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of treasury stock as a result of exercises
of stock options
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
7,649
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,701
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
9,555
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
620,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
140,293
|
|
|
|
41,760
|
|
Payments on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(101,324
|
)
|
|
|
(47,256
|
)
|
Payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(14,833
|
)
|
|
|
(14,691
|
)
|
Payment of long-term debt assumed in MPC acquisition
|
|
|
(18,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment for cash flow hedge
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(5,602
|
)
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
608,331
|
|
|
|
(53,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(42,277
|
)
|
|
|
9,341
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
109,833
|
|
|
|
71,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
67,556
|
|
|
$
|
80,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
5
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 1.
|
Basis of
presentation and nature of operations
|
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Woodward
Governor Company (Woodward or the
Company) as of June 30, 2009 and for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, included
herein, have not been audited by an independent registered
public accounting firm. These Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments which are,
in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly
Woodwards financial position as of June 30, 2009, and
the results of operations and cash flows for the periods
presented herein. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2008 was derived from Woodwards Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The results
of operations for the three and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results to be expected for other interim periods or
for the full fiscal year. Dollar amounts contained in these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are in thousands,
except per share amounts.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein
have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements
and Notes thereto included in Woodwards Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and other
financial information filed with the SEC.
The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements requires management to make use of estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the
reported revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting
period and certain financial statement disclosures. Significant
estimates in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
include allowances for losses, net realizable value of
inventories, percent complete on long-term fully-funded
contracts, cost of sales incentives, useful lives of property
and identifiable intangible assets, the evaluation of
impairments of property, identifiable intangible assets and
goodwill, income tax and valuation reserves, the valuation of
assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations,
assumptions used in the determination of the funded status and
annual expense of pension and postretirement employee benefit
plans, and the valuation of stock compensation instruments
granted to employees. Actual results could vary materially from
Woodwards estimates.
Woodward is an independent designer, manufacturer, and service
provider of energy control and optimization solutions for
commercial and military aircraft and ground vehicles, turbines,
reciprocating engines, and electrical power system equipment.
Woodwards innovative fluid energy, combustion control,
electrical energy, and motion control systems help customers
offer cleaner, more reliable and more cost-effective equipment.
Leading original equipment manufacturers use Woodwards
products and services in aerospace, power and process
industries, and transportation.
Woodward operates in the following four business segments:
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems develops and manufactures systems and
components that provide energy control and optimization
solutions for the aircraft and industrial gas turbine markets.
|
|
|
|
Airframe Systems develops and manufactures
high-performance cockpit, electromechanical and hydraulic motion
control systems, and mission-critical actuation systems and
controls for weapons, aircraft, turbine engines and combat
vehicles, primarily for aerospace and military applications.
|
6
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems develops and manufactures
systems and components that provide power sensing and energy
control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability,
and availability of electrical power networks for industrial
markets, which include the power generation, power distribution,
and power conversion industries.
|
|
|
|
Engine Systems develops and manufactures systems and
components that provide energy control and optimization
solutions for the industrial engine and steam turbine markets,
which include the power generation, transportation, and process
industries.
|
On October 1, 2008, Woodward completed the acquisition of
MPC Products Corporation (MPC Products), and
Techni-Core, Inc. (Techni-Core and, together with
MPC Products, MPC), which formed the basis for the
Airframe Systems business segment.
On April 3, 2009, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of HR Textron Inc. from Textron Inc., its parent
company, and the United Kingdom assets and certain liabilities
related to HR Textron Inc.s business (collectively
HRT). HR Textron Inc. became a wholly owned
subsidiary of Woodward and was renamed Woodward HRT, Inc.
following the consummation of the acquisition. HRT is being
integrated into Woodwards Airframe Systems business
segment.
Additional information about Airframe Systems and the MPC and
HRT acquisitions is included in Note 3, Business
acquisitions.
|
|
C.
|
Recently
adopted accounting policies related to acquisitions
|
Revenue Recognition Woodward generally
recognizes revenue upon shipment or delivery for the sale of
products that are not under long-term contracts. Delivery is
upon completion of manufacturing, customer acceptance, and the
transfer of the risks and rewards of ownership. In countries
whose laws provide for retention of some form of title by
sellers, enabling recovery of goods in the event of customer
default on payment, product delivery is considered to have
occurred when the customer has assumed the risks and rewards of
ownership of the products.
Revenue from cost-reimbursable type contracts is recognized on
the basis of reimbursable contract costs incurred during the
period, including applicable fringe, overhead expenses, and
general administrative expenses, as permitted by the specific
contracts. For most cost reimbursable contracts, sales are
calculated based on the percentage that total costs incurred
bear to total estimated costs at completion. For certain
contracts with large upfront purchases of material, sales are
calculated based on the percentage that incurred direct labor
costs bear to total estimated direct labor costs. Airframe
Systems does not progress bill for any services where the
contract has not been completed or where the contract does not
have specified milestones, unless specifically permitted by the
contract.
Long-Term Development Contracts Airframe
Systems provides development services under long-term
development contracts. Development services may be fully-funded
or partially-funded by the customer based on the terms of the
contract.
Revenues under long-term fully-funded contracts and fixed price
contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting in accordance with American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
No. 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and
Certain Production-Type Contracts. Under the
percentage-of-completion method, Woodward estimates profit as
the difference between the total estimated revenue and the cost
of a contract. Woodward then recognizes this estimated profit
over the contract term based on either the costs incurred (under
the cost-to-cost method, which is typically used for development
effort) or the units delivered (under the units-of-delivery
method, which is used for production effort), as appropriate
under the circumstances. Revenues under all cost-reimbursement
contracts are recorded
7
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
using the cost-to-cost method. Revenues under fixed-price
contracts generally are recorded using the units-of-delivery
method; however, when the contracts provide for periodic
delivery after a lengthy period of time over which significant
costs are incurred or when they require a significant amount of
development effort in relation to total contract volume,
revenues are recorded using the cost-to-cost method.
Profits from long-term fully-funded development contracts are
based on estimates of total contract cost and revenue utilizing
current contract specifications, expected engineering
requirements and the achievement of contract milestones,
including product deliveries. Certain contracts are awarded with
price redetermination or for cost
and/or
performance incentives. Such redetermined amounts or incentives
are included in sales when the amounts can reasonably be
determined and estimated. Amounts representing contract change
orders, claims requests for equitable adjustment, or limitations
in funding are included in sales only when they can be reliably
estimated and realization is probable. Contract costs typically
are incurred over a period of several years, and the estimation
of these costs requires substantial judgment. Woodward reviews
and revises these estimates periodically throughout the contract
term. Revisions to contract profits are recorded when the
revisions to estimated revenues or costs are made. Anticipated
losses on contracts are recognized in full during the period in
which the losses become probable and estimable. In the period in
which it is determined that a loss will result from the
performance of a contract, the entire amount of the estimated
ultimate loss is charged against income. Loss provisions are
first offset against costs that are included in inventories,
with any remaining amount reflected in liabilities. Changes in
estimates of contract sales, costs, and profits are recognized
using the cumulative
catch-up
method of accounting. This method recognizes in the current
period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior
periods. As a result, the effect of the changes on future
periods of contract performance is recognized as if the revised
estimate had been the original estimate. A significant change in
an estimate on one or more contracts could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Costs related to partially funded contracts are accounted for
using the guidance provided in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
99-5,
Accounting for Pre-Production Costs Related to
Long-Term Supply Arrangements
(EITF 99-5).
EITF 99-5
addresses whether design and development costs related to
long-term supply arrangements should be expensed or capitalized.
Airframe Systems also produces goods to customers
specifications. All pre-production costs to design, develop, and
test prototypes, in excess of a buyers funding, are
expensed as incurred. In the event costs are equal to or less
than a buyers funding levels, the costs are capitalized.
Costs incurred to produce deliverable hardware are inventoried.
On customer programs where such costs exceed market value,
inventory is written down to reflect market value. In addition,
losses are recorded for outstanding purchase orders for
materials procured specifically for such programs. Revenue and
capitalized costs are recognized in earnings as milestones are
achieved.
Certain of Airframe Systems contracts are with the
U.S. government and commercial customers who supply the
U.S. government, and are subject to audit and adjustment.
For all such contracts, revenues have been recorded based upon
those amounts expected to be realized upon final settlement. The
Federal Acquisition Regulations provide guidance on the types of
costs that will be reimbursed in establishing contract price.
8
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
D.
|
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense paid
|
|
$
|
19,048
|
|
|
$
|
4,026
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
16,446
|
|
|
|
24,193
|
|
Income taxes received
|
|
|
2,781
|
|
|
|
12,726
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment on account
|
|
$
|
3,756
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
Long-term debt assumed in a business acquisition
|
|
|
18,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets sold for note receivable
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
Note 2.
|
Recently
adopted and issued but not yet effective accounting
standards
|
|
|
A.
|
Accounting
changes and recently adopted accounting standards
|
SFAS 157: In September 2006, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires
additional disclosures about a companys financial assets
and liabilities that are measured at fair value. SFAS 157
does not change existing guidance on whether or not an
instrument is carried at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP
FAS 157-1)
which excludes SFAS No. 13, Accounting for
Leases and certain other accounting pronouncements
that address fair value measurements, from the scope of
SFAS 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP
FAS 157-2),
which delays the effective date for SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
after November 15, 2008. In October 2008, the FASB issued
FSP
No. FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a
Market That Is Not Active (FSP
FAS 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the market
for a financial asset is inactive. Specifically, FSP
FAS 157-3
clarifies how (1) managements internal assumptions
should be considered in measuring fair value when observable
data are not present, (2) observable market information
from an inactive market should be taken into account, and
(3) the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be
considered in assessing the relevance of observable and
unobservable data to measure fair value.
On October 1, 2008, Woodward adopted the measurement and
disclosure impact of SFAS 157 as amended by FSP
FAS 157-1
and FSP
FAS 157-3
only with respect to financial assets and liabilities. The
adoption did not have a material impact on its Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. Woodward expects to adopt the
nonfinancial assets and liabilities portion of SFAS 157 in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and is currently evaluating the
impact the adoption may have on its Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet are categorized based upon
the fair value hierarchy established by SFAS 157, which
prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into the
following levels:
Level 1: Inputs based on quoted market prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement
date.
9
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
Level 2: Quoted prices included in Level 1, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and
liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that
are observable and can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Inputs reflect managements best estimates
and assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are
unobservable in the market and significant to the valuation of
the instruments.
The following table presents information about Woodwards
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of June 30, 2009, and indicate the fair value
hierarchy of the valuation techniques Woodward utilized to
determine such fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds
|
|
$
|
10,343
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,343
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
$
|
15,132
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds: Woodward
sometimes invests excess cash in money market funds not insured
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
The investments in money market funds are reported at fair
value, with realized gains or, potentially, losses, realized in
earnings and are included in Cash and cash
equivalents. The fair values of Woodwards
investments in money market funds are based on the quoted market
prices for the net asset value of the various money market funds.
Trading securities: Woodward holds marketable
equity securities, through investment in various mutual funds,
related to its deferred compensation program. In accordance with
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities and based on Woodwards
intentions regarding these instruments, marketable equity
securities are classified as trading securities. The trading
securities are reported at fair value, with realized gains and
losses recognized in earnings. The trading securities are
included in Other current assets. The fair values of
Woodwards trading securities are based on the quoted
market prices for the net asset value of the various mutual
funds.
SFAS 159: In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 expands the use of
fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards
that require certain assets or liabilities to be carried at fair
value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial
reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to
apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS 159,
a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure
eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159
became effective for Woodward on October 1, 2008. Woodward
has not elected to apply SFAS 159 to any eligible items as
of June 30, 2009.
SFAS 161: In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable
investors to better understand their effects on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
new standard is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 became effective for
Woodward on January 1, 2009. Woodward adopted the
provisions of SFAS 161 effective January 1, 2009. See
Note 11 for Woodwards disclosures about its
derivative instruments.
10
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8: In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 140-4
and Financial Interpretations No. (FIN) 46(R)-8
(FIN 46(R)-8), Disclosures by Public
Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and
Interests in Variable Interest Entities (FSP
FAS 140-4).
The document increases disclosure requirements for public
companies and is effective for reporting periods (interim and
annual) that end after December 15, 2008. FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 became effective for Woodward on
October 1, 2008. The adoption of FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 had no impact on Woodwards Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1: On
April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, (FSP
FAS 107-1).
FSP
FAS 107-1
relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments
that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair
value. Prior to issuing FSP
FAS 107-1,
fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed
once per year. FSP
FAS 107-1
requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing
qualitative and quantitative information about fair value
estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on
the balance sheet at fair value. The Company has provided these
disclosures in Note 19 to these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
SFAS 165: In May 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
(SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure
of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date and alerts all users of
financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent
events after that date in the set of financial statements being
presented. The new standard is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009. SFAS 165 became effective for
Woodward on April 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 165
had no impact on Woodwards Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. In regards to the issuance of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management
evaluated subsequent events through July 22, 2009.
|
|
B.
|
Issued
but not yet effective accounting standards:
|
EITF 07-1:
In November 2007, the EITF issued
EITF 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements
(EITF 07-1).
EITF 07-1,
which will be applied retrospectively, requires expanded
disclosures for contractual arrangements with third parties that
involve joint operating activities and may require
reclassifications to previously issued financial statements.
EITF 07-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 (fiscal year 2010 for Woodward). Woodward is currently
evaluating the impact
EITF 07-1
may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 141(R): In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141 (Revised) Business
Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)).
SFAS 141(R)
is intended to improve, simplify, and converge internationally
the accounting for business combinations. Under
SFAS 141(R),
an acquiring entity in a business combination must recognize the
assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition date fair
values, with limited exceptions. In addition, SFAS 141(R)
requires the acquiror to disclose all information that investors
and other users need to evaluate and understand the nature and
financial impact of the business combination. SFAS 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. Accordingly, Woodward will
record and disclose business combinations under the revised
standard beginning October 1, 2009.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1: In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
SFAS No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That
Arise from Contingencies (FSP
SFAS 141(R)-1). This FSP amends and clarifies
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), to
require that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the
acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a
business combination that arises from a contingency if the
acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be
11
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
determined during the measurement period. If the
acquisition-date fair value of such an asset acquired or
liability assumed cannot be determined, the acquiror should
apply the provisions of SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS 5), to determine whether the
contingency should be recognized at the acquisition date or
after it. FSP SFAS 141(R)-1 is effective for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations
for which the acquisition date is after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning after December 15,
2008. Accordingly, Woodward will adopt FSP SFAS 141(R)-1
prospectively in fiscal year 2010.
SFAS 160: In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of
Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51
(SFAS 160). This statement amends ARB 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require
(i) noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component
of equity, (ii) changes in a parents ownership
interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be
accounted for as equity transactions, and (iii) any
retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair
value. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations consummated on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008.
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. As a result, SFAS 160 is effective
for Woodward in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Woodward
anticipates that, upon the adoption of SFAS 160,
approximately $3,000 will be reclassified within its Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet from other liabilities to
stockholders equity.
FSP
FAS 142-3:
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP
FAS 142-3),
which improve the consistency of the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset among various pronouncements. FSP
FAS 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 (fiscal year 2010 for Woodward). Woodward is currently
assessing the impact that FSP
FAS 142-3
may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
FSP
EITF 03-6-1:
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities
(FSP
EITF 03-6-1).
The FSP addresses whether instruments granted in stock-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
The new FSP is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim
periods within those years (fiscal year 2010 for Woodward).
Early application is not permitted. Woodward anticipates that,
upon the adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1,
outstanding restricted stock will be included in the denominator
of both the basic and fully diluted earnings per share
calculations in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
FSP 132(R)-1: In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures
about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP
FAS 132(R)-1). The guidance requires employers to
disclose factors that help investors understand a plans
investment policies and strategies, the nature of each asset
category in the plan and the risks associated with the
categories, information that helps investors assess the data and
valuation methods used to develop fair value measurements for
plan assets, particularly for instruments that are not actively
trading in open markets, and concentrations of risk in the plan.
FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will be effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2010 for Woodward).
Woodward is currently assessing the impact that FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 may have on its Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
SFAS 166: In June 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets (SFAS 166).
SFAS 166 removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity (QSPE) from
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities (SFAS 140) and removes
the exception from applying FIN 46 (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46(R)). This statement also clarifies
the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of
financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting.
SFAS 166 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
12
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
November 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2011 for Woodward). Woodward
is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 166 may have on
its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 167: In June 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends FIN 46(R)
to require an analysis to determine whether a variable interest
gives the entity a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. This statement requires an ongoing reassessment
and eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for
determining whether an entity is the primary beneficiary.
SFAS 167 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2011 for Woodward). Woodward
is currently assessing the impact that SFAS 167 may have on
its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 162 and SFAS 168: In May 2008, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 162). SFAS 162 is technically
effective for periods ending after September 15, 2009
(fiscal year 2009 for Woodward). In June 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 is
also effective for periods ending after September 15, 2009
and effectively supersedes SFAS 162; therefore, Woodward
does not anticipate that it will ever adopt SFAS 162.
SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification) as the source of
authoritative U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities, in
combination with rules and interpretive releases of the SEC
under authority of U.S. federal securities laws for SEC
registrants. The Codification organizes and simplifies all
authoritative U.S. GAAP literature, and establishes that
all authoritative U.S. GAAP in the Codification carries an
equal level of authority. SFAS 168 will be effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009 (fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2009 for Woodward). Woodward does not anticipate that the
adoption of SFAS 168 will have any impact on its Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Note 3.
|
Business
acquisitions
|
Woodward has recorded the recent acquisitions described in this
Note 3 using the purchase method of accounting and,
accordingly, has included the results of operations of the
acquired businesses in its consolidated results as of the date
of each acquisition. In accordance with SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations, the respective
purchase prices for these acquisitions are allocated to the
tangible assets, liabilities and intangible assets acquired
based on their estimated fair values. The excess purchase price
over the respective fair values of assets is recorded as
goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized for book purposes in
accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. The goodwill resulting from
the MPC and MotoTron Corporation (MotoTron)
acquisitions is not tax deductible while the goodwill resulting
from the HRT acquisition will be tax deductible.
Woodward has evaluated and continues to evaluate pre-acquisition
contingencies related to its recent acquisitions that may have
existed as of the acquisition dates. If these pre-acquisition
contingencies become probable in nature and estimable during the
remainder of the purchase price allocation period, amounts will
be recorded to goodwill for such matters. If these
pre-acquisition contingencies become probable in nature and
estimable after the end of the purchase price allocation period,
amounts will be recorded for such matters in Woodwards
results of operations.
MPC
acquisition
On October 1, 2008, Woodward acquired all of the
outstanding stock of Techni-Core and all of the outstanding
stock of MPC Products not owned by Techni-Core for approximately
$370,435. The estimated purchase price, less approximately
$18,610 of assumed outstanding debt, is included in Cash
flows from investing activities in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Woodward paid cash at
closing of approximately $334,702, a portion of which was used
by the Company to repay the outstanding debt of MPC in an
aggregate amount equal to
13
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
approximately $18,610. In addition, contractual change of
control payments totaling $32,175 were made to certain MPC
employees during October 2008 as a result of employment
agreements in place prior to the acquisition. Direct transaction
costs include investment banking, legal, and accounting fees and
other external costs directly related to the acquisition.
MPC is an industry leader in the manufacture of high-performance
electromechanical motion control systems, primarily for
aerospace applications. MPCs main product lines include
high performance electric motors and sensors, analog and digital
control electronics, rotary and linear actuation systems, and
flight deck and
fly-by-wire
systems for commercial and military aerospace programs. Through
an improved focus on aerospace energy control solutions, MPC
complements Woodwards energy and motion control
technologies and is expected to enhance Woodwards system
offerings. MPC formed the basis of the fourth Woodward business
segment, Airframe Systems.
The preliminary purchase price of the MPC acquisition is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to owners
|
|
$
|
316,092
|
|
Long-term liabilities assumed
|
|
|
18,610
|
|
Contractual change in control obligations
|
|
|
32,175
|
|
Estimated direct transaction costs
|
|
|
3,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated purchase price
|
|
$
|
370,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPC Products is subject to an investigation by the
U.S. Department of Justice (the DOJ) regarding
certain of its government contract pricing practices prior to
2005 and a related temporary suspension from participation in
federal procurements and grants (See Note 18.
Contingencies). Payments associated with this
pre-acquisition contingency will be incremental to the estimated
purchase price above. The purchase price paid by Woodward in
connection with the MPC acquisition, as shown above, was reduced
by this contingency totaling $25,000 at closing.
The following table summarizes preliminary estimated fair values
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
the MPC acquisition, including accrued restructuring charges:
|
|
|
|
|
At October 1, 2008
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
112,116
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
21,885
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
164,200
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
23,940
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
182,619
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
506,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
33,665
|
|
Department of Justice matter
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
65,009
|
|
Other tax noncurrent
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
135,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
370,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
A summary of the intangible assets acquired, amortization
methods, and estimated useful lives follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Method
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Product Software
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
25,600
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
114,200
|
|
|
|
16 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
164,200
|
|
|
|
14 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated amortization is calculated based on the pattern of
estimated future economic benefits of the related intangible
asset.
Woodward is in the process of finalizing valuations of
intangible assets, estimates of liabilities, including
restructuring reserves, and related income tax adjustments
associated with the MPC acquisition.
The results of MPCs operations are included in
Woodwards Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
beginning October 1, 2008.
MotoTron
acquisition
On October 6, 2008, Woodward acquired MotoTron and the
intellectual property assets owned by its parent company,
Brunswick Corporation, which were used in connection with the
MotoTron business for approximately $17,237. The estimated
purchase price is included in Cash flows from investing
activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows. The Company paid cash at closing of $17,000. In January
2009, Woodward received $29 based on the outcome of working
capital adjustment procedures.
MotoTron specializes in software tools and processes used to
rapidly develop control systems for marine, power generation,
industrial and other engine equipment applications. MotoTron was
integrated into Woodwards Engine Systems business segment.
MotoTron has been an important supplier and partner to Woodward
since 2002 and has helped Woodward to better position itself in
electronic control technologies for the alternative-fueled bus
and mobile equipment markets. The acquisition of MotoTron
further strengthens Woodwards ability to serve the
transportation and power generation markets.
The preliminary purchase price of the MotoTron acquisition is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to owners
|
|
$
|
16,971
|
|
Estimated direct transaction costs
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated purchase price
|
|
$
|
17,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
A summary of the preliminary estimated fair values of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the MotoTron
acquisitions, including accrued restructuring charges, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
At October 1, 2008
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
3,886
|
|
Deferred income tax assets current
|
|
|
271
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
939
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
7,771
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,318
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
8
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
19,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges
|
|
|
332
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
17,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the intangible assets acquired, amortization
methods, and estimated lives follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Method
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
17 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Product Software
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
Process technology
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated amortization is calculated based on the pattern of
estimated future economic benefits of the related intangible
asset.
Woodward is in the process of finalizing valuations of estimates
of liabilities, including restructuring reserves, and related
income tax adjustments associated with the MotoTron acquisition.
The results of MotoTrons operations are included in
Woodwards Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings as
of October 6, 2008. If the MotoTron acquisition had been
completed on October 1, 2008, Woodwards net sales and
net earnings for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009 would not have been materially different from amounts
reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
HRT
acquisition
On April 3, 2009, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding
stock of HR Textron Inc. from Textron Inc., its parent company,
and the United Kingdom assets and certain liabilities related to
HR Textron Inc.s business for approximately $380,749. The
estimated purchase price is included in Cash flows from
investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows. Woodward paid cash at closing of
approximately $377,660.
HRT is an industry leader in the advanced technology,
engineering development, and manufacturing of mission-critical
actuation systems and controls for weapons, aircraft, turbine
engines and combat vehicles. It is recognized for hydraulic and
electric primary flight control actuation products, including
electro-mechanical
16
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
actuation systems for unmanned combat air vehicles and weapons,
such as the Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) and the AIM-9X
Sidewinder; hydraulic and electric flight controls for fixed and
rotor wing aircraft; servovalves for global aerospace; turret
controls and stabilization systems for the U.S. M1 Abrams
Main Battle Tank and other armored vehicles worldwide; and fuel
and pneumatics valves for aircraft and helicopters. HRT is
expected to complement the MPC business and is being integrated
into Woodwards Airframe Systems business segment.
The preliminary purchase price of the HRT acquisition is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to owners
|
|
$
|
377,660
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Estimated direct transaction costs
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated purchase price
|
|
$
|
380,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes preliminary estimated fair values
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
the HRT acquisition, including accrued restructuring charges:
|
|
|
|
|
At April 3, 2009
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
115,502
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
38,326
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
130,800
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
141,143
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
425,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
24,078
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
6,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
45,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
380,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the intangible assets acquired, amortization
methods, and estimated useful lives follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Method
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
Favorable lease contracts
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
ERP System
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
Product Software
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
68,500
|
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
130,800
|
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
Accelerated amortization is calculated based on the pattern of
estimated future economic benefits of the related intangible
asset.
Woodward made a 338(h)(10) election with the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service, which allows the HRT acquisition to be treated
as an asset purchase for income tax purposes. Accordingly, any
deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded by Textron Inc. at
the acquisition date are not available to Woodward because the
election causes the HRT acquisition to be treated, for income
tax purposes, as though Woodward did not purchase an ongoing
business.
In connection with the HRT acquisition, Woodward assumed certain
defined benefit pension obligations contingent upon transfer of
related pension plan assets (See Note 14. Retirement
benefits). If for any reason the pension plan assets are not
transferred, Woodward is not contractually obligated to assume
the related pension benefit obligation, which would reduce both
the assumed postretirement benefits liabilities and goodwill by
approximately $10,000.
Woodward is in the process of finalizing valuations of property,
plant, and equipment, other intangibles, defined benefit plan
assets and liabilities, estimates of other liabilities,
including restructuring reserves, and related income tax
adjustments associated with the HRT acquisition.
The results of HRTs operations are included in
Woodwards Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings as
of April 3, 2009.
Pro forma
results for MPC and HRT acquisitions
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents
the combined results of operations of Woodward, MPC, and HRT as
if the acquisitions had occurred as of the beginning of each of
the fiscal years presented. The pro forma financial information
is presented for informational purposes and is not indicative of
the results of operations that would have been achieved if the
acquisitions and related borrowings had taken place at the
beginning of each of the fiscal years presented. The unaudited
pro forma financial information for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2009 includes the historical results of
Woodward, including the post-acquisition results of MPC since
October 1, 2008 and HRT since April 3, 2009. The
unaudited pro forma financial information for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008 combines the historical results
of Woodward with the historical results of MPC and HRT for those
periods. The unaudited pro forma financial information for the
nine months ended June 30, 2009 combines the historical
results of Woodward with the historical results of HRT for the
approximately six months ended April 2, 2009. Prior to the
HRT acquisition by Woodward, HRT was a wholly owned subsidiary
of Textron Inc. and as such was not a stand-alone entity.
Accordingly, the historical operating results of HRT may not be
indicative of the results that might have been achieved,
historically or in the future, if HRT had been a stand-alone
entity. The unaudited pro forma results for all periods
presented include amortization charges for acquired intangible
assets, eliminations of intercompany transactions, adjustments
for stock options and restricted stock issued, adjustments for
depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment,
adjustments to interest expense, adjustments for estimated
general and administrative costs for HRTs historical
management and administrative structure and functions, and
related tax effects. The unaudited pro forma results follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
386,193
|
|
|
$
|
451,323
|
|
|
$
|
1,186,667
|
|
|
$
|
1,248,989
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
26,147
|
|
|
$
|
31,508
|
|
|
$
|
72,347
|
|
|
$
|
53,804
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
18
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
U.S. GAAP requires that the interim period tax provision be
determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of each quarter, Woodward estimates the tax that will
be provided for the fiscal year stated as a percent of estimated
ordinary income for the fiscal year. The term
ordinary income refers to earnings from continuing operations
before income taxes, excluding significant unusual or
infrequently occurring items.
|
The estimated annual effective rate is applied to the
year-to-date ordinary income at the end of each
quarter to compute the year-to-date tax applicable to ordinary
income. The tax expense or benefit related to ordinary income in
each quarter is the difference between the most recent
year-to-date and the prior quarter year-to-date computations.
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of significant unusual or infrequently occurring
items are recognized as discrete items in the interim period in
which the events occur. The impact of changes in tax laws or
rates on deferred tax amounts, the effects of changes in
judgment about beginning of the year valuation allowances and
changes in tax reserves resulting from the finalization of tax
audits or reviews are examples of significant unusual or
infrequently occurring items that are recognized as discrete
items in the interim period in which the event occurs.
|
The determination of the annual effective tax rate is based upon
a number of significant estimates and judgments, including the
estimated annual pretax income of Woodward in each tax
jurisdiction in which it operates and the development of tax
planning strategies during the year. In addition, as a global
commercial enterprise, Woodwards tax expense can be
impacted by changes in tax rates or laws, the finalization of
tax audits and reviews, as well as other factors that cannot be
predicted with certainty. As such, there can be significant
volatility in interim tax provisions.
The following table sets out the tax expense and the effective
tax rate for Woodwards income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$
|
26,693
|
|
|
$
|
49,096
|
|
|
$
|
89,619
|
|
|
$
|
131,232
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
16,682
|
|
|
|
19,084
|
|
|
|
43,779
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
Income taxes for the nine months ended June 30, 2009
included expense reductions of $1,637 related to the retroactive
extension of the U.S. research and experimentation tax
credit. This expense reduction related to the estimated amount
of the credit applicable to the period from January 1 through
September 30, 2008. There was no similar benefit in the
three or nine months ended June 30, 2008.
The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide
unrecognized tax benefits reported in other liabilities in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was $17,142 at
June 30, 2009 and $22,576 at September 30, 2008.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, Woodward
reached a favorable resolution of an international tax matter,
causing its liability for worldwide unrecognized tax benefits to
decline by $4,992. At June 30, 2009, the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodwards
effective tax rate, if recognized, was $12,529. At this time,
Woodward estimates that it is reasonably possible that the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much
as $3,794 in the next twelve months through completion of
reviews by various worldwide tax authorities.
Woodward recognizes interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. Woodward had accrued
interest and penalties of $3,321 and $5,956 as of June 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively.
19
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
Woodwards tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and
foreign tax authorities and these audits are at various stages
of completion at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to
examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2002
and forward. Woodward is subject to U.S. Federal income tax
examinations for fiscal years 2006 and forward and is subject to
U.S. state income tax examinations for fiscal years 2005
and forward.
|
|
Note 5.
|
Net
earnings per share
|
Net earnings per share basic is computed by dividing
net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the
period. Net earnings per share diluted reflects the
weighted average number of shares outstanding after
consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options and
restricted stock.
The following is a reconciliation of net earnings to net
earnings per share basic and net earnings per
share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
24,997
|
|
|
$
|
32,414
|
|
|
$
|
70,535
|
|
|
$
|
87,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
67,805
|
|
|
|
67,245
|
|
|
|
67,762
|
|
|
|
67,590
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
68,950
|
|
|
|
69,183
|
|
|
|
69,005
|
|
|
|
69,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following stock option grants were outstanding during the
three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
but were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
55,302
|
|
|
$
|
16,221
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
77,932
|
|
|
|
41,047
|
|
Component parts and finished goods
|
|
|
207,397
|
|
|
|
151,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
340,631
|
|
|
$
|
208,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
Note 7.
|
Property,
plant, and equipment net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
13,709
|
|
|
$
|
13,343
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
198,681
|
|
|
|
188,359
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
334,717
|
|
|
|
286,074
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
12,065
|
|
|
|
16,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559,172
|
|
|
|
504,300
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(344,651
|
)
|
|
|
(335,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
214,521
|
|
|
$
|
168,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
9,422
|
|
|
$
|
7,220
|
|
|
$
|
27,897
|
|
|
$
|
21,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Additions and
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
86,565
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,565
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,762
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
324,770
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
17,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
17,021
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
35,631
|
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
41,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
139,577
|
|
|
$
|
330,087
|
|
|
$
|
(98
|
)
|
|
$
|
469,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward tests goodwill on the reporting unit level on an annual
basis as of March 31 each year and more often if an event occurs
or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce
the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
The impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of the
reporting unit, determined using discounted cash flows, with its
carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of
the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, Woodward compares the
implied value of goodwill with its carrying amount. If the
carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the
carrying amount to its implied fair value. Woodward considers
all operating segments to be reporting units for purposes of
testing for goodwill impairment.
21
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
Note 9.
|
Other
intangibles net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Customer relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
44,327
|
|
|
$
|
(16,376
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,951
|
|
|
$
|
44,327
|
|
|
$
|
(15,268
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,059
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
182,905
|
|
|
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
|
181,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
|
|
(11,257
|
)
|
|
|
9,418
|
|
|
|
20,607
|
|
|
|
(9,877
|
)
|
|
|
10,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
250,129
|
|
|
$
|
(29,712
|
)
|
|
$
|
220,417
|
|
|
$
|
67,124
|
|
|
$
|
(25,531
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
(1,220
|
)
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
(5,988
|
)
|
|
|
6,648
|
|
|
|
12,705
|
|
|
|
(5,408
|
)
|
|
|
7,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,961
|
|
|
$
|
(7,909
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,052
|
|
|
$
|
15,495
|
|
|
$
|
(6,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process technology:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
11,941
|
|
|
$
|
(4,412
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,529
|
|
|
$
|
11,941
|
|
|
$
|
(4,113
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,828
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
70,317
|
|
|
|
(1,911
|
)
|
|
|
68,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
(1,249
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
12,593
|
|
|
|
(3,561
|
)
|
|
|
9,032
|
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
|
|
(2,853
|
)
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
96,183
|
|
|
$
|
(11,133
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,050
|
|
|
$
|
18,629
|
|
|
$
|
(8,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
|
|
4,442
|
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,423
|
|
|
$
|
(960
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,463
|
|
|
$
|
4,442
|
|
|
$
|
(693
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
42,158
|
|
|
|
(9,856
|
)
|
|
|
32,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,174
|
|
|
$
|
(10,171
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,003
|
|
|
$
|
1,563
|
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
410,870
|
|
|
$
|
(59,885
|
)
|
|
$
|
350,985
|
|
|
$
|
107,253
|
|
|
$
|
(41,147
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
$
|
8,286
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
18,169
|
|
|
$
|
5,259
|
|
Amortization expense associated with current intangibles is
expected to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
2009 (remaining)
|
|
$
|
8,315
|
|
2010
|
|
|
36,171
|
|
2011
|
|
|
35,448
|
|
2012
|
|
|
32,588
|
|
2013
|
|
|
30,010
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
208,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
350,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10.
|
Long-term
debt and line of credit facilities
|
2008 Term
Loan Credit Agreement
On October 1, 2008, Woodward entered into a Term Loan
Credit Agreement (the 2008 Term Loan Credit
Agreement), which provides for a $150,000 unsecured term
loan facility, and may, from time to time, be expanded by up to
$50,000 of additional indebtedness, subject to the
Companys compliance with certain conditions and the
lenders participation. The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement
bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 2.25%, requires quarterly
principal payments of $1,875 beginning in March 2009, and
matures in October 2013.
The 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement contains customary terms and
conditions, including, among others, covenants that place limits
on the Companys ability to incur liens on assets, incur
additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based
maintenance test), transfer or sell the Companys assets,
merge or consolidate with other persons, make capital
expenditures, make certain investments, make certain restricted
payments, make dividend payments, and enter into material
transactions with affiliates. The 2008 Term Loan Credit
Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that
(a) the Companys ratio of consolidated net debt to
consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization, plus any unusual non-cash charges to the extent
deducted in computing net income minus any unusual non-cash
gains to the extent added in computing net income
(EBITDA), not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 and (b) the
Company have a minimum consolidated net worth of $400,000 plus
50% of net income for any fiscal year and 50% of the net
proceeds of certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on
a rolling four quarter basis. The 2008 Term Loan Credit
Agreement also contains customary events of default, including
certain cross default provisions related to Woodwards
other outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $15,000, the
occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the
amounts due.
Woodwards obligations under the 2008 Term Loan Credit
Agreement are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC Products and
Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Woodward.
2009 Term
Loan Credit Agreement
On April 3, 2009, Woodward entered into a Term Loan Credit
Agreement (the 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement), by
and among Woodward, the institutions from time to time parties
thereto, as lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent. The 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement provides for a $120,000 unsecured term loan facility,
and may be expanded by up to $50,000 of additional indebtedness
from time to time, subject to the Companys compliance with
certain conditions and the lenders participation. The 2009
Term Loan Credit Agreement generally bears interest at LIBOR
plus 2.50% to 3.50% and matures on April 3, 2012.
23
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
Quarterly principal payments of $6,000 are due beginning
September 30, 2009 through June 30, 2010. Quarterly
principal payments of $9,000 are due beginning
September 30, 2010 until maturity. The 2009 Term Loan
Credit Agreement can be prepaid without penalty.
The 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement contains customary terms and
conditions, including, among others, covenants that place limits
on the Companys ability to incur liens on assets, incur
additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based
maintenance test), transfer or sell the Companys assets,
merge or consolidate with other persons, make certain
investments, make certain restricted payments, and enter into
material transactions with affiliates. The 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that
(a) the Companys ratio of consolidated net debt to
consolidated EBITDA not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 and (b) the
Company have a minimum consolidated net worth of $510,000 plus
50% of net income for any fiscal year and 50% of the net
proceeds of certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on
a rolling four quarter basis. The 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement also contains customary events of default, including
certain cross default provisions related to Woodwards
other outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $15,000, the
occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the
amounts due thereunder.
Woodwards obligations under the 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC Products and
Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Woodward.
2008 Note
Purchase Agreement
On October 1, 2008, Woodward entered into a Note Purchase
Agreement (the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement)
relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal
amount of $250,000 comprised of (a) $100,000 aggregate
principal amount of Series B Senior Notes due
October 1, 2013 (the Series B Notes),
(b) $50,000 aggregate principal amount of Series C
Senior Notes due October 1, 2015 (the Series C
Notes) and (c) $100,000 aggregate principal amount of
Series D Senior Notes due October 1, 2018 (the
Series D Notes and, together with the
Series B Notes and Series C Notes, the 2008
Notes) in a series of private placement transactions which
were consummated on October 1, 2008 and October 30,
2008.
The 2008 Notes issued in the private placement have not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be
offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an
applicable exemption from registration requirements. Holders of
the 2008 Notes do not have any registration rights.
The Series B Notes have a maturity date of October 1,
2013 and generally bear interest at a rate of 5.63% per annum.
The Series C Notes have a maturity date of October 1,
2015 and generally bear interest at a rate of 5.92% per annum.
The Series D Notes have a maturity date of October 1,
2018 and generally bear interest at a rate of 6.39% per annum.
Under certain circumstances, the interest rate on each series of
2008 Notes is subject to increase if Woodwards leverage
ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated EBITDA increases
beyond 3.5 to 1.0. Interest on the 2008 Notes is payable
semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year until all
principal is paid. Interest payments commenced on April 1,
2009.
Woodwards obligations under the 2008 Note Purchase
Agreement and the 2008 Notes rank equal in right of payment with
all of Woodwards other unsecured unsubordinated debt,
including its outstanding debt under Woodwards existing
term loan facilities, existing revolving credit facility and
existing note purchase agreements.
The 2008 Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive
covenants, including, among other things, covenants that place
limits on Woodwards ability to incur liens on assets,
incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based
maintenance test), transfer or sell its assets, merge or
consolidate with other persons, and enter into material
transactions with affiliates. The 2008 Note Purchase Agreement
also contains customary events of default, including certain
cross default provisions related to Woodwards other
outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $25,000, the
occurrence of which would permit the holders of the 2008 Notes
to accelerate the amounts due.
24
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The 2008 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants
requiring that Woodwards (a) ratio of consolidated
net debt to consolidated EBITDA not exceed 4.0 to 1.0 during any
material acquisition period, or 3.5 to 1.0 at any other time on
a rolling four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated net
worth at any time equal or exceed $425,000 plus 50% of
consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Additionally,
under the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit
the aggregate amount of priority debt to at any time exceed 20%
of its consolidated net worth at the end of the then most
recently ended fiscal quarter. Priority debt generally refers to
certain unsecured debt of Woodwards subsidiaries and all
debt of Woodward and its subsidiaries secured by liens other
than certain permitted liens.
Woodward is permitted at any time, at its option, to prepay all,
or from time to time prepay any part of, the then outstanding
principal amount of any series of the 2008 Notes at 100% of the
principal amount of the series of 2008 Notes to be prepaid (but,
in the case of partial prepayment, not less than $1,000),
together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to
the date of payment, plus any applicable make-whole amount. The
make-whole amount is computed by discounting the remaining
scheduled payments of interest and principal of the 2008 Notes
being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of
50 basis points and the yield to maturity of
U.S. Treasury securities having a maturity equal to the
remaining average life of the 2008 Notes being prepaid.
Woodwards obligations under the 2008 Note Purchase
Agreement and the 2008 Notes are guaranteed by Woodward FST,
Inc., MPC Products and Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward.
2009 Note
Purchase Agreement
On April 3, 2009, Woodward entered into a Note Purchase
Agreement (the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement)
relating to the sale by Woodward of an aggregate principal
amount of $100,000 of senior unsecured notes comprised of
(a) $57,000 aggregate principal amount of Series E
Senior Notes due April 3, 2016 (the Series E
Notes) and (b) $43,000 aggregate principal amount of
Series F Senior Notes due April 3, 2019 (the
Series F Notes and together with the
Series E Notes, the 2009 Notes) in a private
placement transaction consummated on April 3, 2009.
The 2009 Notes issued in the private placement have not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be
offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an
applicable exemption from registration requirements. Holders of
the 2009 Notes do not have any registration rights.
The Series E Notes have a maturity date of April 3,
2016 and bear interest at a rate of 7.81% per annum. The
Series F Notes have a maturity date of April 3, 2019
and bear interest at a rate of 8.24% per annum. Interest on the
2009 Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15
of each year until the principal is paid. Interest payments
commence on October 15, 2009.
Woodwards obligations under the 2009 Note Purchase
Agreement and the 2009 Notes rank equal in right of payment with
all of Woodwards other unsecured unsubordinated debt,
including outstanding debt under Woodwards existing term
loan facilities, existing revolving credit facility and existing
note purchase agreements.
The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive
covenants, including, among other things, covenants that place
limits on Woodwards ability to incur liens on assets,
incur additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based
maintenance test), transfer or sell Woodwards assets,
merge or consolidate with other persons, and enter into material
transactions with affiliates. The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement
also contains customary events of default, including certain
cross default provisions related to Woodwards other
outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $30,000, the
occurrence of which would permit the holders of the 2009 Notes
to accelerate the amounts due.
25
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants
requiring that Woodwards (a) ratio of consolidated
net debt to consolidated EBITDA not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 at any
time on a rolling four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated
net worth at any time equal or exceed $485,940 plus 50% of
consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009. Additionally,
under the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit
the aggregate amount of priority debt to at any time exceed 20%
of its consolidated net worth at the end of the then most
recently ended fiscal quarter. Priority debt generally refers to
certain unsecured debt of Woodwards subsidiaries and all
debt of the Woodward and its subsidiaries secured by liens other
than certain permitted liens.
Woodward is permitted at any time, at its option, to prepay all,
or from time to time prepay any part of, the then outstanding
principal amount of any series of the 2009 Notes at 100% of the
principal amount of the series of 2009 Notes to be prepaid (but,
in the case of partial prepayment, not less than $1,000),
together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to
the date of payment, plus any applicable make-whole amount. The
make-whole amount is computed by discounting the remaining
scheduled payments of interest and principal of the 2009 Notes
being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of
50 basis points and the yield to maturity of
U.S. treasury securities having a maturity equal to the
remaining average life of the 2009 Notes being prepaid.
Woodwards obligations under the 2009 Note Purchase
Agreement and the 2009 Notes are guaranteed by Woodward FST,
Inc., MPC Products and Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward.
The proceeds from the 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement and the
issuance of the 2008 Notes were used primarily to finance the
MPC and MotoTron acquisitions. The proceeds from the 2009 Term
Loan Credit Agreement and the issuance of the 2009 Notes were
used primarily to finance the HRT acquisition.
Woodward was in compliance with its financial debt covenants at
June 30, 2009.
Outstanding
long-term debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Senior notes 6.39%, due October 2011; unsecured
|
|
$
|
32,143
|
|
|
$
|
42,857
|
|
Term notes 4.25% 6.95%, due September
2009 to June 2012, secured by land and buildings
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
2008 Term loan Variable rate of 1.81% at
June 30, 2009, matures October 2013; unsecured
|
|
|
146,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Term loan Variable rate of 3.30% at
June 30, 2009, matures April 2012; unsecured
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Notes 5.63%, due October 2013;
unsecured
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Notes 5.92%, due October 2015;
unsecured
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Notes 6.39%, due October 2018;
unsecured
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series E Notes 7.81%, due April 2016; unsecured
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series F Notes 8.24%, due April 2019; unsecured
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge
gains
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,904
|
|
|
|
44,897
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(42,926
|
)
|
|
|
(11,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
$
|
606,978
|
|
|
$
|
33,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The senior notes, 2008 and 2009 term loans, and Series B,
C, D, E and F Notes are held by multiple institutions. The term
notes are held by banks in Germany.
The senior notes, 2008 and 2009 term loans, and Series B,
C, D, E and F Notes are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC
Products and Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Woodward.
The current portion of long-term debt includes $142 and $183 at
June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively,
related to the fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized
discontinued hedge gains.
Required future principal payments of outstanding long-term debt
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009 (remaining)
|
|
$
|
8,150
|
|
2010
|
|
|
45,696
|
|
2011
|
|
|
54,563
|
|
2012
|
|
|
69,377
|
|
2013
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
464,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
649,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Issuance Costs
During 2009, Woodward incurred $5,602 of debt issuance costs,
which are being amortized using the effective interest method or
patterns that approximate the effective interest method, over
the term of the debt to which the costs relate. The related
amortization is recognized as interest expense. As of
June 30, 2009, Woodward had $4,995 of unamortized debt
issuance costs related to the 2009 debt issuances.
Lines of
Credit
Woodward has a $225,000 revolving credit facility related to
unsecured financing arrangements with a syndicate of
U.S. banks. The agreement provides for an option to
increase the amount to $350,000, subject to the lenders
participation, and has an expiration date of October 2012. The
interest rate on borrowings under the agreement, which varies
with LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or the prime rate, was 0.91%
as of June 30, 2009. Borrowings under the revolving credit
facility were $43,000 and $0 as of June 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, respectively.
Woodward also has various foreign lines of credit. The lines are
generally reviewed annually for renewal and are subject to the
usual terms and conditions applied by the banks. Aggregate
borrowings under such foreign lines of credit were $0 and $4,031
as of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008,
respectively.
|
|
Note 11.
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Woodward enters into derivative instruments for risk management
purposes only, including derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), and those utilized as economic
hedges. Woodward uses interest rate related derivative
instruments to manage its exposure to fluctuations of interest
rates. By using these instruments, Woodward is exposed, from
time to time, to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the
failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the
derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative
contract is positive, the counterparty owes Woodward, which
creates credit risk for Woodward. Woodward minimizes this credit
risk by entering into
27
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
transactions with high quality counterparties. Market risk is
the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that
results from a change in interest rates, commodity prices,
currency exchange rates, or the market price of Woodwards
common stock. Woodward minimizes this market risk by
establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and
degree of market risk that may be undertaken. As of
June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, all derivative
instruments into which Woodward had entered were terminated.
In 2001, Woodward entered into treasury lock agreements that
were designated as cash flow hedges of its long-term debt. The
discontinuance of these treasury lock agreements resulted in
losses that are recognized as an increase of interest expense
over the term of the associated debt (10 years) using the
effective interest method. The unrecognized portion of the loss
is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
In 2002, Woodward entered into certain interest rate swaps that
were designated as fair value hedges of its long-term debt. The
discontinuance of these interest rate swaps resulted in gains
that are recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the
term of the associated debt (10 years) using the effective
interest method. The unrecognized portion of the gain is
presented as an adjustment to long-term debt based on the
accounting guidance in effect at the time the interest rate
swaps were terminated.
In September 2008, the Company entered into treasury lock
agreements with a notional amount totaling $100,000 that
qualified as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. The objective
of this derivative instrument was to hedge the risk of
variability in cash flows related to future interest payments of
a portion of the anticipated future debt issuances attributable
to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated
with the expected issuance of long-term debt to acquire MPC. The
hedges were terminated prior to September 30, 2008
resulting in a gain of approximately $108 and the gain was
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of
September 30, 2008, net of tax. The realized gain on the
termination of the treasury lock agreements will be recognized
as a reduction of interest expense over a seven-year period on
the hedged debt issued on October 1, 2008 using the
effective interest method.
In March 2009, Woodward entered into LIBOR lock agreements with
a total notional amount of $50,000 that qualified as cash flow
hedges under SFAS 133. The objective of this derivative
instrument was to hedge the risk of variability in cash flows
over a seven-year period related to future interest payments of
a portion of anticipated future debt issuances attributable to
changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated
with the expected issuance of long-term debt to acquire HRT. The
hedges were terminated prior to June 30, 2009, resulting in
a loss of $1,308. The realized loss was recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2009, net of tax.
The realized loss on the terminated LIBOR lock agreements will
be recognized as an increase of interest expense over a
seven-year period on the hedged debt issued on April 3,
2009 using the effective interest method.
The following table discloses the remaining unrecognized gains
and losses associated with the terminated derivative instruments
on Woodwards Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
Unrecognized
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(211
|
)
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term debt |
|
(2) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
28
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The following tables disclose the impact of terminated
derivative instruments on Woodwards Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three months ended June 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
in OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into
|
|
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables disclose the impact of terminated
derivative instruments on Woodwards Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the nine months ended June 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
in OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into
|
|
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the carrying value of the unrecognized gains and losses
on terminated derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges as of June 30, 2009, Woodward expects to reclassify
$294 of net unrecognized losses on terminated derivative
instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
to earnings during the next twelve months.
29
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
Note 12.
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Salaries and other member benefits
|
|
$
|
28,152
|
|
|
$
|
51,773
|
|
Department of Justice matter (see Note 18)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
10,860
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Warranties
|
|
|
10,535
|
|
|
|
7,232
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
6,339
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
Accrued retirement benefits
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
Taxes, other than income
|
|
|
4,949
|
|
|
|
6,908
|
|
Other
|
|
|
28,656
|
|
|
|
11,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
117,228
|
|
|
$
|
85,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions of the Companys sales agreements include
product warranties customary to such agreements. Accruals are
established for specifically identified warranty issues that are
probable to result in future costs. Warranty costs are accrued
on a non-specific basis whenever past experience indicates a
normal and predictable pattern exists. Changes in accrued
product warranties were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
7,232
|
|
Increases in accruals related to warranties during the period
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
Increases due to acquisition of MPC, MotoTron, and HRT
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
Settlements of amounts accrued
|
|
|
(3,729
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
10,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward recognized non-acquisition related restructuring and
other charges totaling $15,159 during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The main components of these charges
included $14,254 of workforce management related costs
associated with the early retirement of approximately
100 employees and the involuntary separation of
approximately 350 employees in connection with a strategic
realignment of global workforce capacity. Other charges totaling
$905 were accrued for an impairment loss related to the sale of
a building that is being vacated.
Restructuring charges related to business acquisitions of
$12,832 include a number of items such as those associated with
integrating similar operations, workforce management, vacating
certain facilities, and the cancellation of some contracts.
30
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The summary of the activity in accrued restructuring charges
during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,341
|
|
|
|
10,341
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,936
|
|
|
|
10,936
|
|
Restructuring provision incurred
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
Payments
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
Non-cash charge for impairment of vacated facility
|
|
|
(905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, March 31, 2009
|
|
|
13,691
|
|
|
|
9,943
|
|
|
|
23,634
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(8,050
|
)
|
|
|
(7,406
|
)
|
|
|
(15,456
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,758
|
|
|
$
|
5,102
|
|
|
$
|
10,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward estimates that its restructuring charges will be
substantially completed within twelve months. Accordingly, the
entire amount is classified as current.
|
|
Note 13.
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net accrued retirement benefits, less amounts recognized with
accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
58,480
|
|
|
$
|
42,103
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22,198
|
|
|
|
25,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,678
|
|
|
$
|
67,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14.
|
Retirement
benefits
|
A September 30 measurement date is utilized to value plan assets
and obligations for all of Woodwards retirement and
healthcare benefit plans, excluding those obligations assumed in
connection with the acquisition of HRT.
In connection with the acquisition of HRT (see Note 3,
Business acquisitions), Woodward recorded approximately
$50,700 of estimated pension benefit obligations related to a
Textron-sponsored defined benefit plan that will be assumed by a
Woodward defined benefit plan established for certain HRT
employees (the Woodward HRT Plan), net of
approximately $40,700 of the estimated related pension plan
assets to be transferred directly to the trustee of the Woodward
HRT Plan by the trustee of the related Textron-sponsored defined
benefit plan. The value of the pension plan assets to be
transferred will be equal to the present value of the
accumulated benefit obligation as of the April 3, 2009, the
date of the HRT acquisition, based upon certain actuarial
assumptions described in the acquisition agreement as adjusted
for investment earnings and benefit payments between the date of
the acquisition
31
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
and the actual date of the funds transfer. If for any reason the
pension plan assets are not transferred to the trustee of the
Woodward HRT Plan, Woodward is not contractually obligated to
assume the related pension benefit obligation. Also, in
connection with the acquisition of HRT, Woodward assumed a
retirement healthcare benefit obligation of approximately
$2,437. Woodward is in the process of finalizing valuations of
the assumed benefit liabilities and related transferred assets.
U.S. GAAP requires that, for obligations outstanding as of
September 30, 2008, the funded status reported in interim
periods shall be the same asset or liability recognized in the
previous year-end statement of financial position adjusted for
(a) subsequent accruals of net periodic benefit cost that
exclude the amortization of amounts previously recognized in
other comprehensive income (for example, subsequent accruals of
service cost, interest cost, and return on plan assets) and
(b) contributions to a funded plan, or benefit payments.
For obligations assumed in the acquisition of HRT, the funded
status reported in interim periods is based on the estimated
value of the net liability assumed on the acquisition date.
The components of the net periodic pension cost related to
continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Retirement pension benefits United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (cost)
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,323
|
|
|
$
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement pension benefits other countries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(545
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
(1,606
|
)
|
|
|
(2,247
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Curtailment cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Settlement cost
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
1,690
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The components of the net periodic retirement healthcare
benefits related to continuing operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Retirement healthcare benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service costs
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
|
(2,424
|
)
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (cost)
|
|
$
|
(129
|
)
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
(487
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
$
|
2,730
|
|
|
$
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward expects its contributions for retirement pension
benefits will be $0 in the United States and $2,179 in other
countries in 2009. Woodward also expects its contributions for
retirement healthcare benefits will be $2,990 in 2009, less
amounts received as U.S. subsidies. The exact amount of
cash contributions made to these plans in any year is dependent
upon a number of factors including minimum funding requirements
in the jurisdictions in which Woodward operates and arrangements
made with trustees of certain foreign plans. As a result, the
actual funding in fiscal 2009 may differ from the current
estimate.
|
|
Note 15.
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
Stock options are granted to Woodwards key management
members. The grant date for these awards is used for the
measurement date. These awards are valued as of the measurement
date and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
requisite vesting period.
Woodward uses the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model to value
its stock options. Expected volatilities are based on historical
volatility using daily stock price observations. Beginning
October, 1, 2008, Woodward, as required by SFAS 123(R),
Share Based Payment, calculates the expected
life based on experience. Prior to October 1, 2008,
Woodward calculated an expected life equal to the midpoint
between the vesting date and the date of contractual expiration
of the options, as permitted by the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletin 107 Share-Based Payment.
Dividend yields are based on historical dividends. The risk-free
interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at
the time of grant. Assumptions used to value options granted are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Estimated volatility
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Estimated dividend yield
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
33
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
The following is a summary of the activity for stock option
awards during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
4,387
|
|
|
$
|
13.29
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
18.67
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
6.97
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
20.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
$
|
13.45
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
12.70
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
16.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,652
|
|
|
$
|
13.64
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
13.37
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
8.66
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
22.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
$
|
13.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the activity for restricted stock
awards during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Price
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Number
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
|
|
Note 16.
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
23,543
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,424
|
)
|
Taxes associated with foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
20,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized derivative losses:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
(137
|
)
|
Realized loss on cash flow hedge, net
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Reclassification to interest expense
|
|
|
154
|
|
Taxes associated with interest reclassification
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated minimum pension liability adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
(3,087
|
)
|
Minimum benefit liability adjustment
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Taxes associated with minimum benefit liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
16,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17.
|
Total
comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
24,997
|
|
|
$
|
32,414
|
|
|
$
|
70,535
|
|
|
$
|
87,453
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
13,964
|
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
|
(3,329
|
)
|
|
|
12,624
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Loss from cash flow hedge, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
38,712
|
|
|
$
|
31,151
|
|
|
$
|
66,399
|
|
|
$
|
99,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward is currently involved in pending or threatened
litigation or other legal proceedings regarding employment,
product liability, and contractual matters arising from the
normal course of business. The Company has accrued for
individual matters that it believes are likely to result in a
loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely
amount of loss.
In addition, MPC Products, one of Woodwards recently
acquired subsidiaries, is subject to an investigation by the DOJ
regarding certain of its government contract pricing practices
prior to June 2005. MPC Products government contract
pricing practices after June 2005 are not the subject of the
investigation nor is MPC Products
35
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
product quality. Prior to Woodwards acquisition of MPC
Products, MPC Products implemented changes to address the issues
raised in the government investigation. MPC Products
current accounting system has been in place for over four years
and is approved by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. MPC
Products and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of
Illinois have reached a settlement in principle and are in the
process of finalizing and obtaining approvals from the DOJ. The
process of finalizing and obtaining the necessary approvals with
the DOJ has taken longer than anticipated. Final disposition
will be subject to acceptance and approval by the
U.S. District Court. It is anticipated that any settlement
of the matter would involve the payment of monetary fines and
other amounts by MPC Products. There can be no assurance as to
the resolution of any of these matters.
On July 8, 2009, MPC Products received a notice of
suspension from the U.S. Department of Defense (the
DOD) stating that MPC Products has been temporarily
suspended from participating in new federal procurements and
grants, effective July 8, 2009. The temporary suspension
applies only to MPC Products. Woodward and its other affiliate
entities, including HRT, are not suspended from government
contracting activities and remain eligible to participate in
federal procurement and grant programs. While the temporary
suspension remains in place, the federal government will not
solicit MPC Products for new contracts and will not award MPC
Products new contracts or contract modifications that add work
to or extend the duration of existing contracts, unless a
compelling need determination is issued by the applicable
agency. In addition, certain government contractors must provide
written notice before awarding to MPC Products subcontracts
exceeding $30 in value, unless a particular agency directs
otherwise. Government contractors are not prohibited from
awarding subcontracts to MPC Products under $30 in value, unless
a particular agency directs otherwise. MPC Products may continue
to perform existing work under prime contracts in existence as
of the date of this suspension, unless a particular agency
directs otherwise. MPC Products has been operating under
government contracts since the DOJ investigation commenced in
2005, and has been discussing a resolution to all of these
issues with the DOD for over a year while awaiting final
approval of a settlement with the DOJ. MPC Products has not
received any notice that the suspension arises out of any
activities other than activities related to MPC Products
government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005.
Woodward does not believe the timing of the DODs notice of
suspension is related to any concerns of misconduct other than
MPC Products government contract pricing practices prior
to June 2005, and MPC Products continues to work with the DOD to
remove the suspension as soon as possible. Woodward believes
this effort will be successful, but cannot predict how long it
will take and there can be no assurance as to its resolution.
Woodward has taken the issues raised in the DOJ investigation
and DOD suspension very seriously. In addition to the changes
described above that were implemented by MPC Products prior to
the acquisition, Woodward has made significant progress since
the acquisition in the implementation and integration of
Woodwards policies and system of internal controls at MPC
Products.
The purchase price paid by Woodward in connection with the
acquisition of MPC was reduced by $25,000, which represents the
amount agreed to in principle by MPC Products with the
U.S. Attorney. Any resulting fines beyond this amount or
other sanctions, ongoing suspensions or debarment could have a
material adverse effect on Woodward.
There are also other individual matters that management believes
the likelihood of a loss when ultimately resolved is less than
likely but more than remote, which were not accrued. While it is
possible there could be additional losses that have not been
accrued, management currently believes the possible additional
loss in the event of an unfavorable resolution of every matter
is less than $10,000 in the aggregate, excluding the DOJ and DOD
matters.
Woodward currently does not have any material administrative or
judicial proceedings arising under any federal, state, or local
provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment or primarily for the purpose of protecting the
environment.
36
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
Woodward does not recognize contingencies that might result in a
gain until such contingencies are resolved and the related
amounts are realized.
In the event of a change in control of the Company, as defined
in certain executive officers employment agreements,
Woodward may be required to pay termination benefits to such
executive officers.
|
|
Note 19.
|
Financial
instruments
|
The estimated fair values of Woodwards financial
instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
67,556
|
|
|
$
|
67,556
|
|
|
$
|
109,833
|
|
|
$
|
109,833
|
|
Investments in deferred compensation program
|
|
|
4,789
|
|
|
|
4,789
|
|
|
|
3,931
|
|
|
|
3,931
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(43,000
|
)
|
|
|
(43,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,031
|
)
|
|
|
(4,031
|
)
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
(636,740
|
)
|
|
|
(649,661
|
)
|
|
|
(44,836
|
)
|
|
|
(44,516
|
)
|
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term
borrowings at variable interest rates are assumed to be equal to
their carrying amounts. Cash and cash equivalents have
short-term maturities and short-term borrowings have short-term
maturities and market interest rates.
Investments related to the deferred compensation program used to
provide deferred compensation benefits to certain employees are
assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts since the assets
are marked to market value each reporting period.
The fair value of long-term debt at fixed interest rates was
estimated based on a model that discounted future principal and
interest payments at interest rates available to the Company at
the end of the period for similar debt of the same maturity. The
weighted-average interest rates used to estimate the fair value
of long-term debt at fixed interest rates were 7.17% at
June 30, 2009 and 6.0% at September 30, 2008.
|
|
Note 20.
|
Segment
information
|
Segment profit is determined based on internal performance
measures used by the Chief Executive Officer to assess the
performance of each business in a given period. In connection
with that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer excludes
matters such as charges for restructuring costs, interest income
and expense, and certain gains and losses from asset
dispositions.
37
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
A summary of consolidated net sales and earnings follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Segment net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
$
|
145,074
|
|
|
$
|
148,622
|
|
|
$
|
439,612
|
|
|
$
|
418,702
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
$
|
148,188
|
|
|
$
|
153,684
|
|
|
$
|
450,735
|
|
|
$
|
431,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
$
|
106,873
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,442
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
$
|
107,676
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
211,604
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
$
|
57,320
|
|
|
$
|
60,003
|
|
|
$
|
150,458
|
|
|
$
|
149,961
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
11,745
|
|
|
|
17,178
|
|
|
|
38,970
|
|
|
|
49,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
$
|
69,065
|
|
|
$
|
77,181
|
|
|
$
|
189,428
|
|
|
$
|
199,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
$
|
76,926
|
|
|
$
|
121,222
|
|
|
$
|
266,086
|
|
|
$
|
339,000
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
9,695
|
|
|
|
24,592
|
|
|
|
31,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
$
|
83,979
|
|
|
$
|
130,917
|
|
|
$
|
290,678
|
|
|
$
|
370,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated external net sales
|
|
$
|
386,193
|
|
|
$
|
329,847
|
|
|
$
|
1,065,598
|
|
|
$
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
30,840
|
|
|
$
|
29,330
|
|
|
$
|
94,774
|
|
|
$
|
87,509
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
(5,990
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
10,778
|
|
|
|
30,804
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
16,982
|
|
|
|
25,748
|
|
|
|
42,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment earnings
|
|
|
43,686
|
|
|
|
57,090
|
|
|
|
150,370
|
|
|
|
157,075
|
|
Nonsegment expenses
|
|
|
(6,126
|
)
|
|
|
(7,437
|
)
|
|
|
(37,523
|
)
|
|
|
(24,344
|
)
|
Interest expense and income, net
|
|
|
(10,867
|
)
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(23,228
|
)
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings before income taxes
|
|
$
|
26,693
|
|
|
$
|
49,096
|
|
|
$
|
89,619
|
|
|
$
|
131,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Woodward
Governor Company
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share
amounts) (Continued)
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventories,
property, plant, and equipment net, goodwill, and
other intangibles net. A summary of consolidated
total assets follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Segment assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
374,419
|
|
|
$
|
371,275
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
864,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
137,007
|
|
|
|
133,928
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
216,899
|
|
|
|
242,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
|
1,593,094
|
|
|
|
747,553
|
|
Unallocated corporate property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
13,226
|
|
Other unallocated assets
|
|
|
151,000
|
|
|
|
166,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$
|
1,757,888
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (amounts in thousands except per share
amounts)
|
Forward
Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
including Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains
forward-looking statements regarding future events and our
future results within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than
statements of historical fact are statements that are deemed
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on
current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections
about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and
assumptions of management. Words such as anticipate,
believe, estimate, seek,
goal, expect, forecasts,
intend, continue, outlook,
plan, project, target,
can, could, may,
should, will, would,
variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended
to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any
statements that refer to projections of our future financial
performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our
businesses, and other characteristics of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements may include, among others, statements relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
future sales, earnings, cash flow, uses of cash and other
measures of financial performance;
|
|
|
|
descriptions of our plans and expectations for future
operations;
|
|
|
|
the effect of economic downturns or growth in particular
regions;
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in the level of activity in particular
industries or markets;
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of materials, components, services,
and supplies;
|
|
|
|
the scope, nature, or impact of acquisition activity and
integration into our businesses;
|
|
|
|
the development, production, and support of advanced
technologies and new products and services;
|
|
|
|
new business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
restructuring costs and savings;
|
|
|
|
our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions with
respect to recent acquisitions and expected business
opportunities that may be available to us;
|
|
|
|
the outcome of contingencies;
|
|
|
|
future repurchases of common stock;
|
|
|
|
future levels of indebtedness and capital spending; and
|
|
|
|
pension plan assumptions and future contributions.
|
Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements
are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties,
and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including:
|
|
|
|
|
a decline in business with or financial distress of our
significant customers;
|
|
|
|
the long sales cycle, customer evaluation process, and
implementation period of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
our ability to implement, and realize the intended effects
of, our restructuring efforts;
|
|
|
|
the recent instability of the credit markets and other
adverse economic and industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
fines, other sanctions, continued suspensions or debarment
related to the recent notice of suspension from the
U.S. Department of Defense (the DOD) or
otherwise resulting from the outcome of the related
investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (the
DOJ) regarding certain pricing practices of MPC
Products Corporation, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries
(MPC Products), prior to June 2005;
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage competitive factors,
including prices, promotional incentives, industry
consolidation, and commodity and other input cost increases;
|
|
|
|
our ability to reduce our expenses in proportion to any sales
shortfalls;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our suppliers to provide us with materials of
sufficient quality or quantity required to meet our production
needs at favorable prices or at all;
|
|
|
|
the success of or expenses associated with our product
development activities;
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate acquisitions and costs related
thereto;
|
|
|
|
our substantial debt and debt service requirements and our
ability to operate our business and pursue business strategies
in the light of certain restrictive covenants in our outstanding
debt documents;
|
|
|
|
future impairment charges resulting from changes in the
estimates of fair value of reporting units or of long-lived
assets;
|
|
|
|
changes in domestic or international tax statutes and future
subsidiary results;
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities related to manufacturing
activities;
|
|
|
|
the geographical location of a portion of our business is in
California, which historically has been susceptible to certain
natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
our continued access to a stable workforce and favorable
labor relations with our employees;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage regulatory, tax and legal
matters (including government contracting, product liability,
patent and intellectual property matters);
|
|
|
|
risks from operating internationally, including the impact on
reported earnings from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates; and
|
|
|
|
certain provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law
that could discourage or prevent others from acquiring our
company.
|
These factors are representative of the risks, uncertainties,
and assumptions that could cause actual outcomes and results to
differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in our
forward-looking statements. Other factors are discussed under
Risk Factors in our SEC filings and are incorporated
by reference.
Therefore, actual results could differ materially and
adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements. For additional information regarding factors that
may affect our actual financial condition and results of
operations, see the information under the caption Risk
Factors in Item 1A in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008 and in Part II,
Item 1A in our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009. We undertake no
obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements
for any reason.
Unless we have indicated otherwise or the context otherwise
requires, references in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
to Woodward, the Company,
we, us, and our refer to
Woodward Governor Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
OVERVIEW
We are an independent designer, manufacturer, and service
provider of energy control and optimization solutions for
commercial and military aircraft and ground vehicles, turbines,
reciprocating engines, and electrical power system equipment.
Our innovative fluid energy, combustion control, electrical
energy, and motion control systems help customers offer cleaner,
more reliable and more cost-effective equipment. Leading
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) use our
products and services in aerospace, power and process
industries, and transportation.
Our strategic focuses are energy control and optimization
solutions. The control of energy, including fluid energy,
combustion, electrical energy and motion, is a growing
requirement in the markets we serve. Our customers
41
look to us to optimize the efficiency, emissions, and operations
of power equipment. Our core technologies leverage well across
our markets and customer applications, enabling us to develop
and integrate cost-effective and
state-of-the-art
fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation, and electronic systems. We
focus primarily on OEMs and equipment packagers, partnering with
them to bring superior component and system solutions to their
demanding applications.
We have four operating business segments Turbine
Systems, Airframe Systems, Electrical Power Systems and Engine
Systems.
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems develops and manufactures systems and
components that provide energy control and optimization
solutions for the aircraft and industrial gas turbine markets.
|
|
|
|
Airframe Systems develops and manufactures
high-performance cockpit, electromechanical and hydraulic motion
control systems, and mission-critical actuation systems and
controls for weapons, aircraft, turbine engines, and combat
vehicles, primarily for aerospace and military applications.
|
Airframe Systems was formed on October 1, 2008 when we
acquired all of the outstanding stock of Techni-Core, Inc.
(Techni-Core) and all of the outstanding stock of
MPC Products Corporation not owned by Techni-Core (MPC
Products and, together with Techni-Core, MPC)
for approximately $370,435.
MPC is an industry leader in the manufacture of high-performance
electromechanical motion control systems, primarily for
aerospace applications. MPCs main product lines include
high performance electric motors and sensors, analog and digital
control electronics, rotary and linear actuation systems, and
flight deck and
fly-by-wire
systems for commercial and military aerospace programs. Through
an improved focus on aerospace energy control solutions, MPC
complements Woodwards energy and motion control
technologies and is expected to enhance Woodwards system
offerings. MPC formed the basis of the fourth Woodward business
segment, Airframe Systems.
On April 3, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of HR Textron Inc. from Textron Inc., its parent
company, and the United Kingdom assets and certain liabilities
related to HR Textron Inc.s business (collectively
HRT) for approximately $380,749.
HRT is an industry leader in the advanced technology,
engineering development, and manufacturing of mission-critical
actuation systems and controls for weapons, aircraft, turbine
engines, and combat vehicles. It is recognized for hydraulic and
electric primary flight control actuation products, including
electro-mechanical actuation systems for unmanned combat air
vehicles and weapons, such as the Joint Direct Attack Munitions
(JDAM) and the AIM-9X Sidewinder; hydraulic and electric flight
controls for fixed and rotor wing aircraft; servovalves for
global aerospace; turret controls and stabilization systems for
the U.S. M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank and other armored
vehicles worldwide; and fuel and pneumatics valves for aircraft
and helicopters.
HR Textron Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward
following the completion of the acquisition, and was renamed
Woodward HRT, Inc. HRT is expected to complement the MPC
business and is being integrated into Woodwards Airframe
Systems business segment. Additional information about HRT and
the acquisition is included in Note 3 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, Business
acquisitions in Item 1
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems develops and manufactures
systems and components that provide power sensing and energy
control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability
and availability of electrical power networks for industrial
markets, which include the power generation, power distribution
and power conversion industries.
|
|
|
|
Engine Systems develops and manufactures systems and
components that provide energy control and optimization
solutions for the industrial engine and steam turbine markets,
which include the power generation, transportation, and process
industries.
|
We use segment information internally to assess the performance
of each segment and to make decisions on the allocation of
resources.
42
This discussion should be read together with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008, and the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in this
report. Dollar amounts contained in this discussion and
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
are in thousands, except per share amounts.
Financial information for the acquired MPC and HRT businesses
are reflected in our financial statements from each acquisition
date, October 1, 2008 and April 3, 2009. As a result
of these acquisitions, a comparison of results for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2009 to the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008 may not be particularly
meaningful. References to organic sales or earnings
refer to financial information of Woodward businesses excluding
the businesses acquired in the MPC and HRT acquisitions that are
being integrated into the Airframe Systems business segment.
Quarterly
Highlights
Net sales for the third quarter were $386,193, including net
sales of $106,873 related to Airframe Systems, an increase of
17.1% from $329,847 for the third quarter of the prior year.
Without the effects of Foreign exchange rates, net sales for the
quarter would have been 3% higher.
Net earnings for the third quarter of 2009 were $24,997, or
$0.36 per share, compared to $32,414, or $0.47 per share, for
the three months ended June 30, 2008. Net earnings for the
quarter included the special items set forth in the table below.
Foreign exchange rates had a negative impact on earnings in the
quarter of approximately $0.02 per share.
Items that (increased) decreased net earnings in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Purchase accounting inventory basis
step-up
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: income tax impact
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After income tax impact
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce management and other charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: income tax impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After income tax impact
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,295
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable resolution of prior year tax issues
|
|
$
|
(4,992
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,992
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 reflect our
continued focus on generating cash from both operations and
working capital, which allowed us to reduce debt after the MPC
and HRT acquisitions. Net cash provided by operating activities
for the quarter was $63,332 compared to $56,160 for the prior
year quarter. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we
acquired HRT and, in connection with the acquisition, added
$220,000 of long-term debt and $105,000 of short-term borrowings
under our revolving credit facility. Cash flows from operating
activities allowed us to pay down approximately $64,000 of debt
during the quarter.
Both the MPC and HRT businesses are performing in line with our
operational expectations and we believe that we have begun to
realize some of the identified synergies.
Year to
Date Highlights
Net sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 were
$1,065,598, an increase of 17.4% over $907,663 for the same
period of the prior year. Foreign exchange rates had a negative
impact on net sales of approximately 3%.
Year to date net earnings were $70,535, or $1.02 per share,
which included the special items noted in the above table,
compared to $87,453, or $1.26 per share, in the same period last
year. Foreign exchange rates had a negative impact on
2009 year to date earnings per share of approximately $0.09.
43
We implemented a number of projects aimed at improving our
earnings through cost reduction and efficiency enhancements.
Savings from these initiatives are expected to primarily impact
manufacturing overhead expenses and selling, general, and
administrative expenses.
Cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 was $115,158 compared to $85,351 for the same
period last year.
At June 30, 2009, our total assets were $1,757,888,
including $67,556 in cash and cash equivalents, and our total
debt was $692,904. As of June 30, 2009, we had liquidity
available under our revolving credit facility of approximately
$180,000. We believe liquidity and cash generation will be
critical to funding our ongoing operating needs. We also believe
that the restructuring and other cost reduction actions we have
implemented will generate improved cash flow from operations and
that this level of cash generation, together with our existing
current assets and available borrowing capacity, will adequately
support our operations and the strategic initiatives we have
identified.
Results
of Operations
Net
Sales
The following table presents the breakdown of consolidated net
sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
Segment net sales
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
148,188
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
$
|
153,684
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
$
|
450,745
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
431,931
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
107,676
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,604
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
69,065
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
77,181
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
189,428
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
199,546
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
83,979
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
130,917
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
290,678
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
370,779
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
|
408,908
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
361,782
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
1,142,445
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1,002,256
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less intersegment net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
|
(3,114
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(5,062
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(11,123
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(13,229
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
(11,745
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(17,178
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(38,970
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(49,585
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
(7,053
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(9,695
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(24,592
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(31,779
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
386,193
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
329,847
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,065,598
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009 increased 17.1% and 17.4% compared to the
same periods in fiscal 2008. Total organic sales were down 15.3%
(approximately 11% excluding the effects of foreign exchange
rates), largely reflecting the economic impact of decreased net
sales in our Engine Systems business segment. Total organic net
sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 were down
5.7% (approximately 2% excluding the effects of foreign
exchange) compared to the same period last year. We expect our
end markets to be mixed, with a slight overall decline in 2010.
Turbine Systems segment net sales (including
intersegment sales) decreased 3.6% in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and increased 4.4% in the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods a year ago. Net
sales for the quarter reflected slowing deliveries of new
aerospace equipment and aftermarket sales, partially offset by
continued strength in industrial offerings this quarter. The
year to date net sales increase was driven by higher demand for
industrial gas turbine products partially offset by a decline in
the business jet portion of the market. Year to date, our
aftermarket business has been flat compared to the same period
last year. Aircraft containing Woodward product has grown,
increasing our installed base. In addition, there was a
favorable mix of aircraft still in service, offset by the
negative impact of revenue passenger miles and cargo service in
2009 compared to 2008 and airline withdrawals of some older
aircraft from service.
44
Airframe Systems segment net sales
(including intersegment sales) were $107,676 and
$211,604 for the three and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2009. On April 3, 2009, we acquired HRT and
have been integrating this business into our Airframe Systems
business segment. Our defense business remains stable, and
commercial airframe sales are showing weakness.
Electrical Power Systems segment net sales
(including intersegment sales) decreased 10.5% and 5.1%
in the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009,
compared to the same periods a year ago. Foreign exchange rates
had a negative impact of approximately 10% on segment net sales
for both the three and nine month periods ended June 30,
2009. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange rates, net
segment sales are essentially flat for the quarter. Year to
date, excluding the effects of foreign exchange rates, segment
sales were up approximately 5% largely driven by increased wind
turbine converter sales. This increase was partially offset by
declines in other products for the power generation and
distribution markets.
Engine Systems segment net sales (including
intersegment sales) decreased 35.9% and 21.6% for the three and
nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
periods a year ago. The lower sales levels were attributable to
broad declines across the transportation and power generation
markets. Foreign exchange rates had a negative impact on segment
net sales of approximately $3,054 (2.3%) and $9,474 (2.6%) for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009.
Costs and
Expenses
The following table presents costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
|
|
External
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
Consolidated net external sales
|
|
$
|
386,193
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
329,847
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,065,598
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
907,663
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
287,094
|
|
|
|
74.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
231,955
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
766,919
|
|
|
|
72.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
633,162
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
%
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
33,182
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
28,434
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
94,735
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
86,081
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
20,676
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
18,994
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
58,556
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
53,401
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,286
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
18,169
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10,886
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
24,130
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(902
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1,470
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
359,500
|
|
|
|
93.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
280,751
|
|
|
|
85.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
975,979
|
|
|
|
91.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
776,431
|
|
|
|
85.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2009 increased to 74.3% and 72.0% from 70.3%
and 69.7% in the same periods last year. Correspondingly, gross
margins (as measured by net sales less cost of goods sold)
decreased to 25.7% and 28.0% for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to 29.7% and 30.3% for the same
periods last year. The decrease in gross profit margin was
attributable to the $12,500 charge related to purchase
accounting for HRT, decreases in sales volume and the addition
of the MPC and HRT businesses, which generally have lower gross
margins than our other businesses.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a
percent of sales were 8.6% and 8.9% for the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 8.6% and 9.5% for
the same periods last year. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009
increased 16.7% and 10.1% compared with the same period in the
prior year, primarily due to the addition of the related
expenses of the MPC and HRT business activity, offset by
reductions in variable compensation accruals and the favorable
effects of foreign exchange rates. Accruals of variable
compensation are affected by projections of company-wide
performance-based factors for the entire fiscal year.
Research and development costs as a percent of
sales were 5.4% and 5.5% for the three and nine month periods in
fiscal 2009 as compared to 5.8% and 5.9% in fiscal 2008.
Research and development costs increased
45
8.9% and 9.7% for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2008. The change
reflects research and development added as a result of the
acquisitions of MPC, MotoTron and HRT, offset by lower levels of
development activity during the quarter for our other business
segments. We continue to invest in next-generation technologies
and products in all of our businesses. While the pace of
research is expected to be tempered, our current level of
spending is consistent with our expectations and longer-term
requirements, although some quarterly variability is expected to
continue.
We believe that the result of our investments within Turbine
Systems contributed to the selection of our integrated fuel
system by GE Aviation for its GEnx turbofan engine, powering the
Boeing 787 Dreamliner and Boeing
747-8
airliner, and our fuel and combustion components for the
Pratt & Whitney F135 and GE Rolls-Royce F136 engines,
powering the Lockheed-Martin Joint Strike Fighter. We have
expanded our collaboration with key customers by signing joint
technology demonstration or production contracts with GE
Aviation and Pratt & Whitney for their next generation
of commercial aircraft engines and with GE Energy and
Pratt & Whitney Power Systems for their next
generation of industrial gas turbine applications.
Airframe Systems is developing highly integrated and advanced
cockpit control and actuation systems and components for motion
control and sensing in the weapons, aerospace and defense
markets. The aerospace industry continues to move toward more
electric (fly-by-wire), lighter weight aircraft,
while demanding increased reliability and redundancy. Airframe
Systems invests in development programs to address the
anticipated requirements of the industry and our customers.
Airframe Systems is investing in development programs which
include: integrated electromechanical sensor and actuation
solutions to support the more electric aircraft effort,
technology to use composites for weight reductions in large
hydraulic actuation systems, and technologies to provide fault
tolerant capabilities for component, sensor and actuation
systems. In addition, Airframe Systems is developing an expanded
family of cockpit control products (including throttle and
rudder controls) for both conventional and
fly-by-wire
technology.
Electrical Power Systems continues to develop grid connected
inverter platforms that enable large scale wind turbine power
integration.
Electrical Power Systems is also developing electrical
protection and metering devices that would provide safer and
more reliable electrical power distribution to commercial and
industrial users and utilities in a networked environment. The
new power distribution platform is expected to be IEC 61850
enabled and a key component for smart grid implementation. We
continue to develop products for distributed energy resource
integration based on our latest power generation controls
platform. A recent derivative of our power generation platform
focuses on combined heat and power application, which is
intended to increase overall efficiency.
Engine Systems continues to develop components and integrated
systems that allow our customers to meet developed
countries future emissions regulations, ever increasing
fuel efficiency demands, and support the growing infrastructure
needs in India, China, and the rest of Asia. Development
projects include components for our market leading Compressed
Natural Gas (CNG) systems for buses and trucks, next generation
injectors and pumps for diesel fuel systems used in shipping,
construction equipment, and power generation markets, a new line
of steam turbine control products, and control systems for the
new and growing diesel particulate filter market.
Amortization of intangible assets as a percent of
sales was 2.1% and 1.7% for the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to 0.5% and 0.6% for the same
periods last year reflecting higher levels of amortization
expense related to $302,771 of intangible assets acquired with
MPC and MotoTron in October 2008 and HRT in April 2009.
Restructuring and Other Charges resulted from a
number of projects we have been implementing aimed at improving
our margins through cost reduction and efficiency enhancements.
The savings were primarily related to indirect expenses,
selling, general, and administrative expenses and facility
rationalization.
We recognized non-acquisition related restructuring and other
charges totaling $15,159 during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. No additional restructuring charges were
recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2009. No
restructuring costs were incurred in the three or nine month
periods ended June 30, 2008. The main components of the
charges included $14,254 of workforce management related costs
associated with voluntary early retirements and involuntary
separations impacting approximately 450 employees, in
connection
46
with a strategic realignment of global workforce capacity.
Charges totaling $905 were accrued for an impairment loss
related to the sale of a building that was vacated. Included
elsewhere in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements is
an additional $1,446 of special charges, for a total impact of
$16,605.
Interest expense as a percent of sales was 2.8%
and 2.3% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009
as compared to 0.3% for both periods last year reflecting
$400,000 of long-term debt issued in October 2008, which was
used primarily to finance the acquisitions of MPC and MotoTron
and $220,000 of long-term debt issued in April 2009 and $105,000
of borrowings from the revolving credit facility incurred in
April 2009, which was used primarily to finance the HRT
acquisition.
Earnings
The following table presents earnings by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
30,840
|
|
|
$
|
29,330
|
|
|
$
|
94,774
|
|
|
$
|
87,509
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
(5,990
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
10,778
|
|
|
|
30,804
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
16,982
|
|
|
|
25,748
|
|
|
|
42,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment earnings
|
|
|
43,686
|
|
|
|
57,090
|
|
|
|
150,370
|
|
|
|
157,075
|
|
Nonsegment expenses and eliminations
|
|
|
(6,126
|
)
|
|
|
(7,437
|
)
|
|
|
(37,523
|
)
|
|
|
(24,344
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(10,867
|
)
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(23,228
|
)
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
26,693
|
|
|
|
49,096
|
|
|
|
89,619
|
|
|
|
131,232
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
(16,682
|
)
|
|
|
(19,084
|
)
|
|
|
(43,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings
|
|
$
|
24,997
|
|
|
$
|
32,414
|
|
|
$
|
70,535
|
|
|
$
|
87,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents earnings by segment as a percent of
segment net sales, including intersegment sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Organic net earnings decreased approximately 22.6% excluding the
effects of foreign exchange rates for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period last year.
Organic net earnings decreased approximately 12.4% excluding the
effects of foreign exchange rates for the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period last year.
47
Turbine Systems segment earnings increased
5.1% and 8.3% in the three and nine months ended June 30,
2009, as compared to the same periods last year due to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
29,330
|
|
|
$
|
87,509
|
|
Sales volume changes
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
7,296
|
|
Selling price changes
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
4,640
|
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
(1,514
|
)
|
|
|
(8,266
|
)
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
3,008
|
|
|
|
8,936
|
|
Cost inflation
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,930
|
)
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,151
|
)
|
|
|
(1,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
30,840
|
|
|
$
|
94,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems segment earnings for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 reflect cost management actions taken
on lower sales.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, Turbine
Systems segment earnings improved from the same period a
year ago as a result of the selling price and cost and expense
management actions mentioned above, and from increased sales
volume, driven by higher demand for industrial gas turbine
products, partially offset by a decline in demand in the
business jet portion of the market. Accruals of variable
compensation are affected by projections of company-wide
performance-based factors for the entire fiscal year. We
continued to make significant investments in research and
development activity, while implementing targeted cost
reductions among these activities.
Airframe Systems segment loss was $5,990 and
$956 for the three and nine month periods ended June 30,
2009. The segment loss for the quarter reflects $12,500 in
charges to cost of goods sold related to the purchase accounting
step-up in
inventory values associated with the HRT acquisition and $6,640
in amortization of intangibles related to the MPC and HRT
acquisitions, all of which are non-cash charges. Non-cash
intangible amortization in the nine month period ended
June 30, 2009 totaled $13,253 related to the recent MPC and
HRT acquisitions. Our Airframe Systems integration is expected
to contribute to improved profitability, broader control system
content, and better aftermarket presence and support. Airframe
Systems has begun to realize anticipated cost savings, and
further cost and marketing synergies are expected in coming
quarters. Operational integration of MPC and HRT is proceeding
consistent with our expectations.
Electrical Power Systems segment earnings
increased 16.0% and 11.9% in the three and nine month
periods ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods
last year due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
10,778
|
|
|
$
|
27,518
|
|
Sales volume changes
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
5,919
|
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
Increased labor costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,834
|
)
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
(3,601
|
)
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
12,501
|
|
|
$
|
30,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind inverter sales continued to show growth, excluding the
effects of foreign exchange rates, but this growth was partially
offset by declines in sales of products related to power
generation and distribution. Segment earnings
48
were favorably affected by product mix and previously taken
actions to manage costs, partially offset by $1,345 and $3,601
of unfavorable effects of foreign exchange rates during the
three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009.
Engine Systems segment earnings decreased
62.7% and 38.8% in the three and nine month periods ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the same periods last year due
to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
16,982
|
|
|
$
|
42,048
|
|
Sales volume changes
|
|
|
(19,743
|
)
|
|
|
(32,767
|
)
|
Selling price changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
6,665
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
Decreased infrastructure and overhead related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
Decrease in freight and duty
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
3,267
|
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,335
|
|
|
$
|
25,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in Engine Systems segment earnings was significantly
affected by the decrease in sales volumes, partially offset by
our cost reduction actions and reductions in freight costs.
Nonsegment expenses for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 were $6,126 or 1.6% of net sales, down from
$7,437 or 2.3% of net sales last year. Nonsegment expenses for
the nine months ended June 30, 2009 were $37,523 compared
to $24,344 for the same period last year. Excluding the effect
of the $16,605 restructuring and special charges recorded in the
second quarter, nonsegment expenses decreased to $20,918 on a
year to date basis, or 2.0% of current year net sales, compared
to 2.7% of net sales in fiscal 2008.
Income taxes were provided at an effective rate on
earnings before income taxes of 6.4% and 21.3% for the three and
nine month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to 34.0%
and 33.4% for the same periods last year. The change in the
effective tax rate (as a percent of earnings before income
taxes) was attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Nine Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Effective tax rate at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
33.4
|
%
|
Research credit in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Change in estimate for previous periods and settlements with tax
authorities
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
Foreign earnings mix
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Other changes, net
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide
unrecognized tax benefits was $17,142 at June 30, 2009, and
$22,576 at September 30, 2008. During the three months
ended June 30, 2009, we reached a favorable resolution of
an international tax matter, causing our liability for worldwide
unrecognized tax benefits to decline by $4,992. At June 30,
2009, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact
our effective tax rate, if recognized, was $12,529. At this
time, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to
$3,794 in the next twelve months through completion of reviews
by various worldwide tax authorities.
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits in tax expense. We had accrued interest and penalties
of $3,321 and $5,956 as of June 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008.
49
Our tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax
authorities and these audits are at various stages of completion
at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to examination in
significant foreign jurisdictions include 2002 and forward. We
are subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for
fiscal years 2006 and forward and U.S. state income tax
examinations for fiscal years 2005 and forward.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
Our ability to service our long-term debt, to remain in
compliance with the various restrictions and covenants contained
in our debt agreements and to fund working capital, capital
expenditures and product development efforts will depend on our
ability to generate cash from operating activities which in turn
is subject to, among other things, future operating performance
as well as general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory, and other conditions, some of which may
be beyond our control.
Historically, we have been able to finance the ongoing business,
including capital expenditure and product development, with cash
flow provided by operating activities. We expect that cash
generated from our operating activities will continue to fund
our operating needs in the near term. In the event we are unable
to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities, we
have a revolving credit facility related to unsecured financing
arrangements with a syndicate of U.S. banks totaling
$225,000, with an option to increase the amount to $350,000,
subject to the lenders participation. On April 3,
2009, we borrowed $105,000 under the revolving credit facility
to finance a portion of the HRT acquisition, of which $43,000
remained outstanding as of June 30, 2009. In addition, we
have various foreign lines of credit tied to net amounts on
deposit at certain foreign financial institutions, which are
generally reviewed annually for renewal. Historically, we have
used borrowings under these foreign lines of credit to finance
certain local operations.
The additional debt incurred in connection with the HRT
acquisition could make it more difficult for us to meet
financial covenants contained in our debt agreements and has
limited the amount of additional debt we can incur. At
June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with the financial
covenants under our existing long-term agreements and revolving
credit facility.
We believe liquidity and cash generation are important to fund
our ongoing operating needs. We also believe that the
restructuring and other cost reduction actions we have been
taking will continue to generate cash flow from operations and
that this level of cash generation, together with our existing
current assets and available borrowings, will adequately support
our operations and the strategic initiatives we have identified.
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
374,419
|
|
|
$
|
371,275
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
864,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
137,007
|
|
|
|
133,928
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
216,899
|
|
|
|
242,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
|
1,593,094
|
|
|
|
747,553
|
|
Nonsegment assets
|
|
|
164,794
|
|
|
|
179,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$
|
1,757,888
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems segment assets increased
$3,144 during the nine months ended June 30, 2009,
reflecting higher inventories and accounts receivable.
Inventories increased during the nine months ended June 30,
2009 due to higher incoming material relative to sales caused by
supplier lead times. In an effort to decrease inventories, we
have taken steps to more accurately align future purchases of
inventories with current sales demand and, as a result,
inventories have decreased during the last quarter. Customer
billings were higher than collections of accounts receivable
during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to
sales growth with customers whose contractual payment terms are
longer than our average collection period. Capital expenditures
were lower than
50
depreciation during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 due
to a focus on optimizing the use of existing fixed assets to
meet business needs rather than acquiring new assets.
Airframe Systems segment assets increased
$864,769 from October 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009 due to
the formation of the business segment from the recent
acquisitions of MPC and HRT during the nine month period. During
the nine month period of operations, Airframes Systems segment
assets have primarily decreased through lower inventories,
intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment, with
accounts receivable remaining relatively stable. The decrease in
inventory was primarily due to amortization of purchase price
adjustments and supply chain management of material receipts.
The decrease in intangible assets is due to amortization
expense. The decrease in property, plant, and equipment was due
to depreciation expense outpacing capital expenditures.
In connection with the acquisition of HRT, we recorded
approximately $50,700 of estimated pension benefit obligations
related to a Textron-sponsored defined benefit plan that will be
assumed by a Woodward defined benefit plan established for
certain HRT employees (the Woodward HRT Plan), net
of approximately $40,700 of the estimated related pension plan
assets to be transferred directly to the trustee of the Woodward
HRT Plan by the trustee of the related Textron-sponsored defined
benefit plan. The value of the pension plan assets to be
transferred will be equal to the present value of the
accumulated benefit obligation as of the April 3, 2009, the
date of the HRT acquisition, based upon certain actuarial
assumptions described in the acquisition agreement as adjusted
for investment earnings and benefit payments between the date of
the acquisition and the actual date of the funds transfer. Also,
in connection with the acquisition of HRT, we assumed a
retirement healthcare benefit obligation of approximately
$2,437. We are in the process of finalizing valuations of the
assumed benefit liabilities and related transferred assets.
Electrical Power Systems segment assets
increased $3,079 during the nine months ended
June 30, 2009 primarily due to the purchase of land for the
expanded operations in Krakow, Poland and increases in inventory
supporting the buildup of global converter production activity,
partially offset by reduced accounts receivable as a result of
lower quarterly sales.
Engine Systems segment assets decreased by
$25,451 during the nine months ended June 30, 2009 due to
lower levels of inventory and accounts receivable balances
resulting from year over year decreases in sales. Capital
expenditures were lower than depreciation during the nine months
ended June 30, 2009.
Nonsegment assets decreased $14,670 during the
nine months ended June 30, 2009 primarily because of
decreases in cash and cash equivalents, partially offset by
increases in deferred taxes and debt issuance costs. The debt
issuance costs are related to the approximately $400,000 of
long-term debt issued in October 2008, which was used primarily
to finance the acquisitions of MPC and MotoTron, including the
repayment of certain obligations associated with those
acquisitions, and $220,000 of long-term debt issued in April
2009, which was used primarily to finance the acquisition of
HRT. Changes in cash are discussed more fully in a separate
section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Other
Balance Sheet Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
416,683
|
|
|
$
|
369,211
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
606,978
|
|
|
|
33,337
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
80,678
|
|
|
|
67,695
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
690,079
|
|
|
|
629,628
|
|
Working capital (current assets less current
liabilities) increased to $416,683 at June 30, 2009 from
$369,211 at September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of
the working capital added through the acquisitions of MPC,
MotoTron, and HRT.
Long-term debt, less current portion increased in
the nine months ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the
issuance of $400,000 of long-term debt in October 2008, which
was used primarily to finance the acquisitions of MPC and
MotoTron, including the repayment of certain obligations
associated with those acquisitions, and $220,000 of long-term
debt issued in April 2009 which was used primarily to finance
the acquisition of HRT. See
51
additional discussion in Note 10 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, Long-term debt and
line of credit facilities, in
Item 1 Financial Statements.
We have a $225,000 revolving credit facility, with an option to
increase the amount to $350,000, subject to the lenders
participation. In addition, we have additional short-term
borrowing capabilities under various foreign lines of credit
tied to net amounts on deposit at certain foreign financial
institutions, which are generally reviewed annually for renewal.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility were $43,000 and
$0 as of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008.
Aggregate borrowings under our foreign lines of credit were $0
and $4,031 as of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008.
The debt agreements contain customary events of default,
including certain cross default provisions related to
Woodwards other outstanding debt arrangements.
Provisions of the debt agreements also include covenants
customary to such agreements that require us to maintain
specified minimum or maximum financial measures and place
limitations on various investing and financing activities. The
agreements also permit the lenders to accelerate repayment
requirements in the event of a material adverse event. Our most
restrictive covenants require us to maintain a minimum
consolidated net worth, a maximum consolidated debt to
consolidated operating cash flow ratio, and a maximum ratio of
consolidated debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization, plus any unusual non-cash
charges to the extent deducted in computing net income, minus
any unusual non-cash gains to the extent added in computing net
income (EBITDA).
Financing activities related to the HRT
acquisition On April 3, 2009, we
entered into a series of financing arrangements, discussed
below, to partially fund the acquisition of HRT.
On April 3, 2009, we entered into a Term Loan Credit
Agreement (the 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement), by
and among Woodward, the institutions from time to time parties
thereto, as lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent. The 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement provides for a $120,000 unsecured term loan facility,
and may be expanded by up to $50,000 of additional indebtedness
from time to time, subject to the Companys compliance with
certain conditions and the lenders participation. The 2009
Term Loan Credit Agreement generally bears interest at LIBOR
plus 2.50% to 3.50% and matures on April 3, 2012. Quarterly
principal payments of $6,000 are due beginning
September 30, 2009 through June 30, 2010. Quarterly
principal payments of $9,000 are due beginning
September 30, 2010 until maturity. The 2009 Term Loan
Credit Agreement can be prepaid without penalty.
The 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement contains customary terms and
conditions, including, among others, covenants that place limits
on our ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt
(including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test),
transfer or sell our assets, merge or consolidate with other
persons, make certain investments, make certain restricted
payments, and enter into material transactions with affiliates.
The 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement contains financial covenants
requiring that (a) our ratio of consolidated net debt to
consolidated EBITDA not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 and (b) we have a
minimum consolidated net worth of $510,000 plus 50% of net
income for any fiscal year and 50% of the net proceeds of
certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on a rolling
four quarter basis. The 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement also
contains customary events of default, including certain cross
default provisions related to Woodwards other outstanding
debt arrangements in excess of $15,000, the occurrence of which
would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due
thereunder.
Our obligations under the 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement are
guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC Products, and Woodward
HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Woodward.
On April 3, 2009, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement
(the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement) relating to the
sale by us of an aggregate principal amount of $100,000 of
senior unsecured notes comprised of (a) $57,000 aggregate
principal amount of Series E Senior Notes due April 3,
2016 (the Series E Notes) and (b) $43,000
aggregate principal amount of Series F Senior Notes due
April 3, 2019 (the Series F Notes and
together with the Series E Notes, the 2009
Notes) in a private placement transaction consummated on
April 3, 2009.
52
The 2009 Notes issued in the private placement have not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be
offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an
applicable exemption from registration requirements. Holders of
the 2009 Notes do not have any registration rights.
The Series E Notes have a maturity date of April 3,
2016 and bear interest at a rate of 7.81% per annum. The
Series F Notes have a maturity date of April 3, 2019
and bear interest at a rate of 8.24% per annum. Interest on the
2009 Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15
of each year until the principal is paid. Interest payments
commence on October 15, 2009.
Our obligations under the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement and the
2009 Notes rank equal in right of payment with all of our other
unsecured unsubordinated debt, including outstanding debt under
our existing term loan facilities, existing revolving credit
facility and existing note purchase agreements.
The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement contains customary restrictive
covenants, including, among other things, covenants that place
limits on our ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional
debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test),
transfer or sell our assets, merge or consolidate with other
persons, and enter into material transactions with affiliates.
The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement also contains customary events
of default, including certain cross default provisions related
to our other outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $30,000,
the occurrence of which would permit the holders of the 2009
Notes to accelerate the amounts due.
The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants
requiring that our (a) ratio of consolidated net debt to
consolidated EBITDA not exceed 3.5 to 1.0 at any time on a
rolling four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated net worth
at any time equal or exceed $485,940 plus 50% of consolidated
net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2009. Additionally, under the 2009
Note Purchase Agreement, we may not permit the aggregate amount
of priority debt to at any time exceed 20% of our consolidated
net worth at the end of the then most recently ended fiscal
quarter. Priority debt generally refers to certain unsecured
debt of the Companys subsidiaries and all debt of the
Company and its subsidiaries secured by liens other than certain
permitted liens.
We are permitted at any time, at our option, to prepay all, or
from time to time prepay any part of, the then outstanding
principal amount of any series of the 2009 Notes at 100% of the
principal amount of the series of 2009 Notes to be prepaid (but,
in the case of partial prepayment, not less than $1,000),
together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to
the date of payment, plus any applicable make-whole amount. The
make-whole amount is computed by discounting the remaining
scheduled payments of interest and principal of the 2009 Notes
being prepaid at a discount rate equal to the sum of
50 basis points and the yield to maturity of
U.S. treasury securities having a maturity equal to the
remaining average life of the 2009 Notes being prepaid.
Our obligation under the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement and the
2009 Notes are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC Products
and Woodward HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Woodward.
The acquisition of HRT was financed with available cash,
borrowings of $105,000 under our existing revolving credit
facility, and the proceeds from the 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement and the issuance of the 2009 Notes.
Commitments and contingencies at June 30,
2009, include various matters arising from the normal course of
business. We are currently involved in pending or threatened
litigation or other legal proceedings regarding employment,
product liability, and contractual matters arising from the
normal course of business. We have accrued for individual
matters that we believe are likely to result in a loss when
ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of
loss.
In addition, MPC Products, one of our recently acquired
subsidiaries, is subject to an investigation by the DOJ
regarding certain of its government contract pricing practices
prior to June 2005. MPC Products government contract
pricing practices after June 2005 are not the subject of the
investigation, nor is MPC Products product quality. Prior
to our acquisition of MPC Products, MPC Products implemented
changes to address the accounting issues raised in the
government investigation. MPC Products current accounting
system has been in place for over four years and is approved by
the Defense Contract Audit Agency. MPC Products and the
U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois have
reached a settlement in principle and are in the process of
finalizing and obtaining approvals from the DOJ. The process of
finalizing and obtaining the necessary approvals with the DOJ
has taken
53
longer than anticipated. Final disposition will be subject to
acceptance and approval by the U.S. District Court. It is
anticipated that any settlement of the matter would involve the
payment of monetary fines and other amounts by MPC Products.
There can be no assurance as to the resolution of any of these
matters.
On July 8, 2009, MPC Products received a notice of
suspension from the DOD stating that MPC Products has been
temporarily suspended from participating in new federal
procurements and grants, effective July 8, 2009. The
temporary suspension applies only to MPC Products. Woodward and
its other affiliate entities, including HRT, are not suspended
from government contracting activities and remain eligible to
participate in federal procurement and grant programs. While the
temporary suspension remains in place, the federal government
will not solicit MPC Products for new contracts and will not
award MPC Products new contracts or contract modifications that
add work to or extend the duration of existing contracts, unless
a compelling need determination is issued by the applicable
agency. In addition, certain government contractors must provide
written notice before awarding to MPC Products subcontracts
exceeding $30 in value, unless a particular agency directs
otherwise. Government contractors are not prohibited from
awarding subcontracts to MPC Products under $30 in value unless
a particular agency directs otherwise. MPC Products may continue
to perform existing work under prime contracts in existence as
of the date of this suspension, unless a particular agency
directs otherwise. MPC Products has been operating under
government contracts since the DOJ investigation commenced in
2005, and has been discussing a resolution to all of these
issues with the DOD for over a year while awaiting final
approval of a settlement with the DOJ. MPC Products has not
received any notice that the suspension arises out of any
activities other than activities related to MPC Products
government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005. We do
not believe the timing of the DODs notice of suspension is
related to any concerns of misconduct other than MPC
Products government contract pricing practices prior to
June 2005, and MPC Products continues to work with the DOD to
remove the suspension as soon as possible. We believe this
effort will be successful, but cannot predict how long it will
take and there can be no assurance as to its resolution.
We have taken the issues raised in the DOJ investigation and DOD
suspension very seriously. In addition to the changes described
above that were implemented by MPC Products prior to the
acquisition, we have made significant progress since the
acquisition in the implementation and integration of our
policies and system of internal controls at MPC Products.
The purchase price paid by us in connection with the acquisition
of MPC was reduced by $25,000, which represents the amount
agreed to in principle by MPC Products with the
U.S. Attorney. Any resulting fines beyond this amount or
other sanctions, ongoing suspensions or debarment could have a
material adverse effect on Woodward.
There are also other individual matters that we believe the
likelihood of a loss when ultimately resolved is less than
likely but more than remote, which were not accrued. While it is
possible that there could be additional losses that have not
been accrued, we currently believe the possible additional loss
in the event of an unfavorable resolution of every matter is
less than $10,000 in the aggregate, excluding the DOJ and DOD
matters.
We currently do not have any material administrative or judicial
proceedings arising under any federal, state, or local
provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment or primarily for the purpose of protecting the
environment.
We do not recognize contingencies that might result in a gain
until such contingencies are resolved and the related amounts
are realized.
In the event of a change in control of Woodward, as defined in
certain executive officers employment agreements, we may
be required to pay termination benefits to such officers.
Stockholders equity increased in the three
and nine month periods ended June 30, 2009. Increases due
to net earnings and sales of treasury stock during the periods
were partially offset by cash dividend payments.
Contractual
Obligations
We have various contractual obligations, including obligations
related to long-term debt, operating leases, purchases,
retirement pensions, and retirement healthcare. These
contractual obligations are summarized and
54
discussed more fully in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in
Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008.
As discussed in Note 10 Long-term debt and line of
credit facilities to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 1 Financial
Statements, an aggregate $220,000 of additional long-term
debt was issued on April 3, 2009 primarily to finance the
HRT acquisition. Scheduled future principal payments on the
$220,000 of long-term debt issued on April 3, 2009, and
associated interest expense, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,047
|
|
2010
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
11,688
|
|
2011
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
10,580
|
|
2012
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,995
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
30,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
220,000
|
|
|
$
|
75,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows
Cash flows were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
115,158
|
|
|
$
|
85,351
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(763,421
|
)
|
|
|
(23,654
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
608,331
|
|
|
|
(53,925
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(42,277
|
)
|
|
|
9,341
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at prior September 30
|
|
|
109,833
|
|
|
|
71,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30
|
|
$
|
67,556
|
|
|
$
|
80,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
increased by $29,807 for the nine month period compared
to the same period last year.
We generated $63,332 of cash flow from operations in the third
quarter. As credit and the economy tighten, we believe adequate
liquidity and cash generation will be important to the execution
of our strategic initiatives. We believe that the restructuring
and other cost reduction actions we have taken will continue to
generate cash flow from operations. We believe that this level
of cash generation, together with our existing current assets
and available borrowings, will adequately support our operations
and the strategic initiatives we have identified. The impacts of
changes in currency rates, while affecting our reported
earnings, are not expected to significantly affect our economic
results due to strategic investment opportunities outside of the
United States.
Net cash flows used in investing activities
increased by $739,767 compared to the same period last
year, primarily as a result of the acquisitions of MPC and
MotoTron during October 2008 and the acquisition of HRT in April
2009.
Capital expenditures decreased by $6,602 during the nine months
ended June 30, 2009 to $17,915, compared to $24,517 during
the same period last year reflecting deferral of certain capital
expenditures to future periods. In 2009, we intend to focus on
our strategy to reduce operating costs, continue our expansion
in Poland, and support our wind growth through expansions in
Colorado and China.
Future capital expenditures are expected to be funded through
cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, and available foreign lines of credit.
55
Net cash flows from financing activities increased
by $662,256 during the nine months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result of
the issuance of $400,000 of long-term debt in October 2008,
which was used primarily to finance the acquisitions of MPC and
MotoTron, including the repayment of certain obligations
associated with these acquisitions, and $220,000 of long-term
debt and borrowed $105,000 under our revolving credit facility
in April 2009, which was used primarily to finance the HRT
acquisition.
As a result of the increases in long-term debt and short-term
borrowings, our debt to total capitalization ratio was 50.1% as
of June 30, 2009 compared to 7.2% as of September 30,
2008.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures
in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make judgments,
assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying
notes. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008 describes the
significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our
critical accounting estimates, discussed in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008, include estimates
for inventory valuation, postretirement benefit obligations,
reviews for impairment of goodwill, and our provision for income
taxes. Such accounting policies and estimates require
significant judgments and assumptions to be used in the
preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
and actual results could differ materially from the amounts
reported based on variability in factors affecting these
estimates.
Our management discusses the development and selection of our
critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit
committee of our board of directors at least annually.
Recently
adopted accounting policies related to acquisitions
Revenue Recognition We generally recognize
revenue upon shipment or delivery for the sale of products that
are not under long-term contracts. Delivery is upon completion
of manufacturing, customer acceptance, and the transfer of the
risks and rewards of ownership. In countries whose laws provide
for retention of some form of title by sellers, enabling
recovery of goods in the event of customer default on payment,
product delivery is considered to have occurred when the
customer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the
products.
Revenue from cost-reimbursable type contracts is recognized on
the basis of reimbursable contract costs incurred during the
period, including applicable fringe, overhead expenses, and
general administrative expenses, as permitted by the specific
contract. For most cost reimbursable contracts, sales are
calculated based on the percentage that total costs incurred
bear to total estimated costs at completion. For certain
contracts with large upfront purchases of material, sales are
calculated based on the percentage that incurred direct labor
costs bear to total estimated direct labor costs. We do not
progress bill for any services where the contract has not been
completed or where the contract does not have specified
milestones, unless specifically permitted by the contract.
Long-Term Development Contracts Airframe
Systems provides development services under long-term
development contracts. Development services may be fully-funded
or partially-funded by the customer based on the terms of the
contract.
Revenues under long-term fully-funded contracts and fixed price
contracts are accounted for under the
percentage-of-completion
method of accounting in accordance with American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
No. 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and
Certain Production-Type Contracts. Under the
percentage-of-completion
method, Woodward estimates profit as the difference between the
total estimated revenue and the cost of a contract. This
estimated profit is recognized over the contract term based on
either the costs incurred (under the
cost-to-cost
method, which is typically used for development effort) or the
units delivered (under the
units-of-delivery
method, which is used for production effort), as appropriate
under the circumstances. Revenues under all cost-reimbursement
contracts are recorded using the
cost-to-cost
method. Revenues under fixed-price contracts generally are
recorded using the
units-of-delivery
method; however, when the contracts provide for periodic
delivery after a lengthy period of time over which
56
significant costs are incurred or when they require a
significant amount of development effort in relation to total
contract volume, revenues are recorded using the
cost-to-cost
method.
Profits from long-term fully-funded development contracts are
based on estimates of total contract cost and revenue utilizing
current contract specifications, expected engineering
requirements and the achievement of contract milestones,
including product deliveries. Certain contracts are awarded with
price redetermination or for cost
and/or
performance incentives. Such redetermined amounts or incentives
are included in sales when the amounts can reasonably be
determined and estimated. Amounts representing contract change
orders, claims requests for equitable adjustment, or limitations
in funding are included in sales only when they can be reliably
estimated and realization is probable. Contract costs typically
are incurred over a period of several years, and the estimation
of these costs requires substantial judgment. We review and
revise these estimates periodically throughout the contract
term. Revisions to contract profits are recorded when the
revisions to estimated revenues or costs are made. Anticipated
losses on contracts are recognized in full during the period in
which the losses become probable and estimable. In the period in
which it is determined that a loss will result from the
performance of a contract, the entire amount of the estimated
ultimate loss is charged against income. Loss provisions are
first offset against costs that are included in inventories,
with any remaining amount reflected in liabilities. Changes in
estimates of contract sales, costs, and profits are recognized
using the cumulative
catch-up
method of accounting. This method recognizes in the current
period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior
periods. As a result, the effect of the changes on future
periods of contract performance is recognized as if the revised
estimate had been the original estimate. A significant change in
an estimate on one or more contracts could have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
Costs related to partially funded contracts are accounted for
using the guidance provided in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
99-5,
Accounting for Pre-Production Costs Related to
Long-Term Supply Arrangements
(EITF 99-5).
EITF 99-5
addresses whether design and development costs related to
long-term supply arrangements should be expensed or capitalized.
Airframe Systems also produces goods to customers
specifications. All pre-production costs to design, develop, and
test prototypes, in excess of a buyers funding, are
expensed as incurred. In the event costs are equal to or less
than a buyers funding levels, the costs are capitalized.
Costs incurred to produce deliverable hardware are inventoried.
On customer programs where such costs exceed market value,
inventory is written down to reflect market value. In addition,
losses are recorded for outstanding purchase orders for
materials procured specifically for such programs. Revenue and
capitalized costs are recognized in earnings as milestones are
achieved.
Certain of Airframe Systems contracts are with the
U.S. government and commercial customers who supply the
U.S. government, and are subject to audit and adjustment.
For all such contracts, revenues have been recorded based upon
those amounts expected to be realized upon final settlement. The
Federal Acquisition Regulations provide guidance on the types of
costs that will be reimbursed in establishing contract price.
Goodwill
We test goodwill on the reporting unit level on an annual basis
and more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that
would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting
unit below its carrying amount. The impairment tests consists of
comparing the fair value of the reporting unit, determined using
discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount including
goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds
its fair value, we compare the implied value of goodwill with
its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be
recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its implied fair
value. We consider all operating segments to be reporting units
for purposes of testing for goodwill impairment.
Market
Risks
In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest
rate risk from our long-term debt, foreign exchange rate risk
related to our foreign operations, and foreign currency
transactions. We are also exposed to various market risks that
arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of
business related to items such as the cost of raw materials and
changes in inflation. Certain contractual relationships with
customers and vendors
57
mitigate risks from changes in raw material costs and currency
exchange rate changes that arise from normal purchasing and
normal sales activities.
These market risks are discussed more fully in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008.
Recently
adopted and issued but not yet effective accounting
standards
Recently
adopted accounting standards
SFAS 157: In September 2006, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires
additional disclosures about a companys financial assets
and liabilities that are measured at fair value. SFAS 157
does not change existing guidance on whether or not an
instrument is carried at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP
FAS 157-1)
which excludes SFAS No. 13, Accounting for
Leases and certain other accounting pronouncements
that address fair value measurements, from the scope of
SFAS 157. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP
FAS 157-2),
which delays the effective date for SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
after November 15, 2008. In October 2008, the FASB issued
FSP
No. FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a
Market That Is Not Active (FSP
FAS 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 when the market
for a financial asset is inactive. Specifically, FSP
FAS 157-3
clarifies how (1) managements internal assumptions
should be considered in measuring fair value when observable
data are not present, (2) observable market information
from an inactive market should be taken into account, and
(3) the use of broker quotes or pricing services should be
considered in assessing the relevance of observable and
unobservable data to measure fair value.
On October 1, 2008, we adopted the measurement and
disclosure impact of SFAS 157 as amended by FSP
FAS 157-1
and FSP
FAS 157-3
only with respect to financial assets and liabilities. The
adoption did not have a material impact on its Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to adopt the
nonfinancial assets and liabilities portion of SFAS 157 in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and are currently evaluating
the impact the adoption may have on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
SFAS 159: In February 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including
an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS 159). SFAS 159 expands the use of
fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards
that require certain assets or liabilities to be carried at fair
value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial
reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to
apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Under SFAS 159,
a company may choose, at specified election dates, to measure
eligible items at fair value and report unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159
became effective for us on October 1, 2008. We have not
elected to apply SFAS 159 to any eligible items as of
June 30, 2009.
SFAS 161: In March 2008, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable
investors to better understand their effects on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
new standard is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 became effective for us on
January 1, 2009. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 161
effective January 1, 2009. See Note 11
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
for the disclosures about our derivative instruments.
58
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8: In December 2008, the FASB issued
FSP
No. FAS 140-4
and Financial Interpretations No. (FIN) 46(R)-8
(FIN 46(R)-8) , Disclosures by Public
Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and
Interests in Variable Interest Entities (FSP
FAS 140-4).
The document increases disclosure requirements for public
companies and is effective for reporting periods (interim and
annual) that end after December 15, 2008. FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 became effective for us on October 1,
2008. The adoption of FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1: On
April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP
FAS 107-1).
FSP
FAS 107-1
relates to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments
that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair
value. Prior to issuing FSP
FAS 107-1,
fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed
once per year. FSP
FAS 107-1
requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing
qualitative and quantitative information about fair value
estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on
the balance sheet at fair value. We provided these disclosures
in Note 19 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 1, Financial
Statements.
SFAS 165: In May 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events
(SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure
of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date and alerts all users of
financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent
events after that date in the set of financial statements being
presented. The new standard is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009. SFAS 165 became effective for us
on April 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 165 had no
impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In
regard to the issuance of these Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements, management evaluated subsequent events through
July 22, 2009.
Issued
but not yet effective accounting standards
EITF 07-1: In
November 2007, the EITF issued
EITF 07-1,
Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements
(EITF 07-1).
EITF 07-1,
which will be applied retrospectively, requires expanded
disclosures for contractual arrangements with third parties that
involve joint operating activities and may require
reclassifications to previously issued financial statements.
EITF 07-1
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 (fiscal year 2010 for us). We are currently evaluating the
impact
EITF 07-1
may have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 141(R): In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141 (Revised) Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)).
SFAS 141(R) is intended to improve, simplify, and converge
internationally the accounting for business combinations. Under
SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity in a business combination
must recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity at the
acquisition date fair values, with limited exceptions. In
addition, SFAS 141(R) requires the acquiror to disclose all
information that investors and other users need to evaluate and
understand the nature and financial impact of the business
combination. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited.
Accordingly, we will record and disclose business combinations
under the revised standard beginning October 1, 2009.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1: In April 2009, the FASB
issued FSP SFAS No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies (FSP
SFAS 141(R)-1).
This FSP amends and clarifies SFAS No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)), to require that an acquirer
recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset
acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that
arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of
that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement
period. If the acquisition-date fair value of such an asset
acquired or liability assumed cannot be determined, the acquiror
should apply the provisions of SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS 5) to determine whether the contingency
should be recognized at the acquisition date or after it. FSP
SFAS 141(R)-1 is effective for assets or liabilities
arising from contingencies in business combinations for which
the acquisition date is
59
]after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, we will
adopt FSP SFAS 141(R)-1 prospectively in
fiscal year 2010.
SFAS 160: In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of
Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51
(SFAS 160). This statement amends ARB 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require
(i) noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component
of equity, (ii) changes in a parents ownership
interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be
accounted for as equity transactions, and (iii) any
retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair
value. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations consummated on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008.
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. As a result, SFAS 160 is effective
for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. We anticipate
that, upon the adoption of SFAS 160, approximately $3,000
will be reclassified within the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet from other liabilities to accumulated paid-in capital.
FSP
FAS 142-3: In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP
FAS 142-3),
which improves the consistency of the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset among various pronouncements. FSP
FAS 142-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008 (fiscal year 2010 for us). We are currently assessing the
impact that FSP
FAS 142-3
may have on our consolidated financial statements.
FSP
EITF 03-6-1: In
June 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities
(FSP
EITF 03-6-1).
The FSP addresses whether instruments granted in stock-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
The new FSP is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim
periods within those years (fiscal year 2010 for us). Early
application is not permitted. We anticipate that, upon the
adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1,
outstanding restricted stock will be included in the denominator
of both the basic and fully diluted earnings per share
calculations in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
FSP 132(R)-1: In December 2008, the FASB issued
FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
(FSP FAS 132(R)-1). The guidance requires
employers to disclose factors that help investors understand a
plans investment policies and strategies, the nature of
each asset category in the plan and the risks associated with
the categories, information that helps investors assess the data
and valuation methods used to develop fair value measurements
for plan assets, particularly for instruments that are not
actively trading in open markets, and concentrations of risk in
the plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will be effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2010 for
us). We are currently assessing the impact that FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 may have on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
SFAS 166: In June 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets (SFAS 166).
SFAS 166 removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity (QSPE) from
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities (SFAS 140) and removes
the exception from applying FIN 46 (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46(R)). This statement also clarifies the
requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of
financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting.
SFAS 166 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2011 for us). We are
currently assessing the impact that SFAS 166 may have on
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 167: In June 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation
No. 46(R)
(SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends
FIN 46(R)
to require an analysis to determine whether a variable interest
gives the entity a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. This statement requires an ongoing reassessment
and eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for
determining whether an entity is the primary beneficiary.
SFAS 167 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2011 for us).
60
We are currently assessing the impact that SFAS 167 may
have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 162 and SFAS 168: In May 2008, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS 162). SFAS 162 is technically
effective for periods ending after September 15, 2009
(fiscal year 2009 for us). In June 2009, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 is
also effective for periods ending after September 15, 2009
and effectively supersedes SFAS 162; therefore, we do not
anticipate that we will ever adopt SFAS 162. SFAS 168
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the source of authoritative
U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities, in combination with
rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of
U.S. federal securities laws for SEC registrants. The
Codification organizes and simplifies user access to all
authoritative U.S. GAAP literature, and establishes that
all authoritative U.S. GAAP in the Codification carries an
equal level of authority. SFAS 168 will be effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009 (fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2009 for us). We do not anticipate that the adoption of
SFAS 168 will have any impact on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest
rate risk from our long-term debt, foreign exchange rate risk
related to our foreign operations, and foreign currency
transactions. We are also exposed to various market risks that
arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of
business related to items such as the cost of raw materials and
changes in inflation. Certain contractual relationships with
customers and vendors mitigate risks from changes in raw
material costs and currency exchange rate changes that arise
from normal purchasing and normal sales activities.
These market risks are discussed more fully in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008.
Interest rate exposure A portion of our long
and short-term debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates.
As of June 30, 2009, our outstanding debt included $266,250
of term loans and $43,000 in advances on our revolving credit
facility with interest rates that fluctuate with market rates. A
hypothetical 1% increase in the assumed effective interest rates
that apply to the variable rate loans outstanding on
June 30, 2009 would cause our annual interest expense to
increase approximately $3,092. Likewise, a hypothetical 0.3%
decrease in interest rates that apply to our variable loans
outstanding on June 30, 2009, which would reduce the
variable LIBOR rate to 0%, would decrease our annual interest
expense by approximately $928.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
We have established disclosure controls and procedures, which
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. These disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated
and communicated to management, including our Principal
Executive Officer (Thomas A. Gendron, Chief Executive Officer
and President) and Principal Financial Officer (Robert F.
Weber, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer), as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Thomas A. Gendron and Robert F. Weber, Jr., evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by this
Form 10-Q.
Based on their evaluations, they concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2009.
Furthermore, there have been no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting, except as discussed below, during the
fiscal quarter covered by this
Form 10-Q
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
61
As discussed in Note 1 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, on October 1, 2008, we completed the
acquisition of MPC and on April 3, 2009, we completed the
acquisition of HRT. We considered the results of our
pre-acquisition due diligence activities, the continuation by
MPC and HRT of their established internal control over financial
reporting, and our implementation of additional internal control
over financial reporting activities as part of our overall
evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures as of
June 30, 2009. The objectives of MPC and HRTs
established internal control over financial reporting is
consistent, in all material respects, with Woodward objectives.
However, we believe the design of MPC and HRTs established
internal control over financial reporting is sufficiently
different from Woodwards overall design to conclude that
Woodwards internal control over financial reporting
materially changed during the quarters in which we completed our
acquisition of MPC, which was the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, and HRT, which was the quarter ended
June 30, 2009. We are in the process of completing a more
complete review of MPC and HRTs internal control over
financial reporting and will be implementing changes to better
align its reporting and controls with the rest of Woodward. As a
result of the timing of the acquisition and the changes that are
anticipated to be made, we currently intend to exclude MPC and
HRT from the September 30, 2009 assessment of
Woodwards internal control over financial reporting, but
expect to include MPC and HRT in the September 30, 2010
assessment. MPC accounted for 25.7% of total assets at
June 30, 2009. MPC accounted for 11.1% of Woodwards
total net sales and 4.4% of Woodwards total segment
earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. HRT accounted
for 23.5% of total assets at June 30, 2009. HRT accounted
for 16.6% of Woodwards total net sales and negative 18.1%
of Woodwards total segment earnings for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009.
62
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are currently involved in pending or threatened litigation or
other legal proceedings regarding employment, product liability,
and contractual matters arising from the normal course of
business. We have accrued for individual matters that we believe
are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using
estimates of the most likely amount of loss.
In addition, MPC Products, one of our recently acquired
subsidiaries, is subject to an investigation by the DOJ
regarding certain of its government contract pricing practices
prior to June 2005. MPC Products government contract pricing
practices after June 2005 are not the subject of the
investigation, nor is MPC Products product quality. Prior
to our acquisition of MPC Products, MPC Products implemented
changes to address the accounting issues raised in the
government investigation. MPC Products current accounting
system has been in place for over four years and is approved by
the Defense Contract Audit Agency. MPC Products and the
U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois have
reached a settlement in principle and are in the process of
finalizing and obtaining approvals from the DOJ. The process of
finalizing and obtaining the necessary approvals with the DOJ
has taken longer than anticipated. Final disposition will be
subject to acceptance and approval by the U.S. District
Court. It is anticipated that any settlement of the matter would
involve the payment of monetary fines and other amounts by MPC
Products. There can be no assurance as to the resolution of any
of these matters.
On July 8, 2009, MPC Products received a notice of
suspension from the DOD stating that MPC Products has been
temporarily suspended from participating in new federal
procurements and grants, effective July 8, 2009. The
temporary suspension applies only to MPC Products. Woodward and
its other affiliate entities, including HRT, are not suspended
from government contracting activities and remain eligible to
participate in federal procurement and grant programs. While the
temporary suspension remains in place, the federal government
will not solicit MPC Products for new contracts and will not
award MPC Products new contracts or contract modifications that
add work to or extend the duration of existing contracts, unless
a compelling need determination is issued by the applicable
agency. In addition, certain government contractors must provide
written notice before awarding to MPC Products subcontracts
exceeding $30 in value, unless a particular agency directs
otherwise. Government contractors are not prohibited from
awarding subcontracts to MPC Products under $30 in value, unless
a particular agency directs otherwise. MPC Products may continue
to perform existing work under prime contracts in existence as
of the date of this suspension, unless a particular agency
directs otherwise. MPC Products has been operating under
government contracts since the DOJ investigation commenced in
2005, and has been discussing a resolution to all of these
issues with the DOD for over a year while awaiting final
approval of a settlement with the DOJ. MPC Products has not
received any notice that the suspension arises out of any
activities other than activities related to MPC Products
government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005. We do
not believe the timing of the DODs notice of suspension is
related to any concerns of misconduct other than MPC
Products government contract pricing practices prior to
June 2005, and MPC Products continues to work with the DOD to
remove the suspension as soon as possible. We believe this
effort will be successful, but cannot predict how long it will
take and there can be no assurance as to its resolution.
We have taken the issues raised in the DOJ investigation and DOD
suspension very seriously. In addition to the changes described
above that were implemented by MPC Products prior to the
acquisition, we have made significant progress since the
acquisition in the implementation and integration of our
policies and system of internal controls at MPC Products.
The purchase price we paid in connection with the acquisition of
MPC was reduced by $25,000, which represents the amount agreed
to in principle by MPC Products with the U.S. Attorney. Any
resulting fines beyond this amount or other sanctions, ongoing
suspensions or debarment could have a material adverse effect on
Woodward.
There are also other individual matters that management believes
the likelihood of a loss when ultimately resolved is less than
likely but more than remote, which were not accrued. While it is
possible there could be additional losses that have not been
accrued, management currently believes the possible additional
loss in the event of an unfavorable resolution of every matter
is less than $10,000 in the aggregate, excluding the DOJ and DOD
63
matters. We currently do not have any significant administrative
or judicial proceedings arising under any Federal, state, or
local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment or primarily for the purpose of protecting the
environment.
Investment in our securities involves risk. An investor or
potential investor should consider the risks summarized below
and in Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I,
Item 1A. of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008, when making
investment decisions regarding our securities. The risk factors
that were disclosed in our
Form 10-K
have not materially changed since the date our
Form 10-K
was filed, except as previously disclosed in Part II,
Item 1A of our
Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 or as otherwise set
forth below.
Company
Risks
Fines, sanctions, suspensions or debarment resulting from the
investigation by the DOJ regarding MPC Products government
contract pricing practices could have a material adverse effect
on Woodward.
MPC Products, one of our recently acquired subsidiaries, is
subject to an investigation by the DOJ regarding certain of its
government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005. MPC
Products and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of
Illinois have reached a settlement in principle and are in the
process of finalizing and obtaining approvals from the DOJ.
Final disposition will be subject to acceptance and approval by
the U.S. District Court. It is anticipated that any
settlement of the matter would involve the payment of monetary
fines and other amounts by MPC Products. In addition, in
connection with the investigation, MPC Products received a
notice of suspension from the DOD stating that MPC Products has
been temporarily suspended from participating in new federal
procurements and grants, effective July 8, 2009. Additional
collateral administrative consequences of the MPC Products
settlement agreement could include ongoing suspension or
debarment of MPC Products from future federal procurement. MPC
Products continues to work with the DOD in an effort to resolve
these administrative matters and remove the suspension. There
can be no assurance as to the resolution of these matters. If
MPC Products is unable to remove the suspension or the
suspension continues for a prolonged period, or if MPC Products
becomes subject to debarment, MPC Products ability to transact
business with the U.S. government would be disrupted and
our growth prospects could be limited. In addition, the purchase
price for MPC was reduced to reflect the $25,000 that has been
agreed to in principle by MPC Products with the
U.S. Attorney. Accordingly, any fines beyond this amount or
other sanctions, ongoing suspensions or debarment, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(a) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Sales of common stock issued from treasury to one of our
directors during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
April 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
May 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The securities were sold in reliance upon the exemption
contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
64
(b) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
Value) of Shares
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
that may yet be
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Purchased under the
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Plans or Programs(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
April 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
168,075
|
|
May 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,075
|
|
June 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009(2)
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
19.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,075
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a new
stock repurchase program of up to $200,000 of our outstanding
shares of common stock on the open market or privately
negotiated transactions over a three-year period that will end
in October 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
The Woodward Governor Company Executive Benefit Plan, which is a
separate legal entity, acquired 1,208 shares of common
stock on the open market related to the reinvestment of
dividends for treasury stock shares under our deferred
compensation plan in June 2009. |
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders.
(a) Exhibits filed as Part of this Report are listed in the
Exhibit Index.
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
Thomas A. Gendron
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 23, 2009
Robert F. Weber, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: July 23, 2009
66
WOODWARD
GOVERNOR COMPANY
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Letter dated June 5, 2009 amending the Purchase and Sale
Agreement, dated February 27, 2009, by and among Textron
Inc., Textron Limited, Woodward Governor Company and Woodward
(U.K.) Limited filed as an exhibit.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated April 3, 2009, by and
among Woodward Governor Company, the institutions from time to
time parties thereto, as lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
National Association, as administrative agent (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2009, by and among
Woodward Governor Company and the purchasers named therein
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
certification of Thomas A. Gendron, filed as an exhibit.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 certifications, filed as an exhibit.
|
67