e20vf
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
o
OR
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
x
For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
.
o
OR
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
o
Date of event requiring this shell company report
.
Commission file
number: 1-15000
Infineon Technologies
AG
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
Am Campeon 1-12,
D-85579 Neubiberg
Federal Republic of
Germany
(Address of principal executive
offices)
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or
Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of each class
American Depositary Shares, each
representing one ordinary share, notional value 2.00 per
share
Ordinary shares, notional value
2.00 per share*
|
|
* |
Registered, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in
connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
|
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close
of the period covered by the annual report. 1,086,742,085
ordinary shares, notional value 2.00 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes
x
No
o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by
check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
Yes
o
No
x
Note Checking the box above will not relieve any
registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their
obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer
x
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant
has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:
U.S.
GAAP o International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board
x Other o
If Other has been checked in response to the
previous question, indicate by check mark which financial
statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17
o
Item 18
x
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
x
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12,
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to
the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes
o
No
o
INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 20-F
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
PRESENTATION OF
FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB). Our consolidated financial
statements are expressed in Euro. In this annual report,
references to Euro or are to Euro
and references to U.S. dollars or $
are to United States dollars. For convenience, this annual
report contains translations of Euro amounts into
U.S. dollars at the rate of 1.00 = $1.4630, the noon
buying rate of the Federal Reserve Board for Euro on
September 30, 2009. The noon buying rate for Euro on
November 30, 2009 was 1.00 = $1.5022. Our fiscal year ends
on September 30 of each year. References to any fiscal year
refer to the year ended September 30 of the calendar year
specified. In this annual report, references to:
|
|
|
|
|
our company are to Infineon Technologies AG and its
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
we, us or Infineon are to
Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries, other than
Qimonda, unless the context otherwise indicates; and
|
|
|
|
Qimonda are to Qimonda AG and its subsidiaries.
|
This annual report contains market data that has been prepared
or reported by Gartner Inc. and its unit Dataquest, Inc.
(together Gartner Dataquest), Frost &
Sullivan, iSuppli Corporation (iSuppli), IMS
Research, Strategy Analytics, Inc. (Strategy
Analytics), and World Semiconductor Trade Statistics
(WSTS).
Amounts presented in tabular format may not add up due to
rounding.
Special terms used in the semiconductor industry are defined in
the glossary.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements.
Statements that are not historical facts, including statements
about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements. These statements are based on current plans,
estimates and projections. Forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to
update any of them in light of new information or future events.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. We caution you that a number of important factors
could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from
those expressed in any forward-looking statement. These factors
include those identified under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this annual report.
Use of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This document contains non-GAAP financial measures.
Non-GAAP financial measures are measures of our historical or
future performance, financial position or cash flows that
contain adjustments that exclude or include amounts that are
included or excluded, as the case may be, from the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with
IFRS in our consolidated financial statements. For descriptions
of these non-GAAP financial measures and the adjustments made to
the most directly comparable IFRS financial measures, please
refer to Operating and Financial Review.
Principal
Business Address
Our principal business address is Am Campeon 1-12, D-85579
Neubiberg, Federal Republic of Germany.
iii
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following selected consolidated financial
data in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements,
the related notes and Operating and Financial
Review, all of which appear elsewhere in this annual
report.
We have derived the selected consolidated statements of
operations and cash flow data for the 2007 through 2009 fiscal
years and the selected consolidated balance sheet data at
September 30, 2007 through 2009 from our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with IFRS and audited by KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, an independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,(1)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009(2)
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
$
|
4,428
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(2,935
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to
shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG (in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
Basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
(3.38
|
)
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
(3.61
|
)
|
|
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
$
|
2,069
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Working capital
(deficit)(3)
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,599
|
|
|
|
6,982
|
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for disposal
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
6,004
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the 2008 fiscal year, we
committed to a plan to dispose of Qimonda. As a consequence, the
results of Qimonda are reported as discontinued operations in
the Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009. The
assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been classified as held
for disposal in the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2008. On January 23, 2009, Qimonda and
its wholly owned subsidiary Qimonda Dresden GmbH & Co.
oHG filed an application at the Munich Local Court to commence
insolvency proceedings. As a result of this application, we
deconsolidated Qimonda during the second quarter of the 2009
fiscal year. On April 1, 2009, the insolvency proceedings
formally opened. In July 2009, we committed to a plan to sell
our Wireline Communications business. As a consequence, the
results of the Wireline Communications business are reported as
discontinued operations in the Selected Consolidated Statements
of Operations data for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2007, 2008 and 2009. Assets and liabilities of the Wireline
Communications business have been classified as held for
disposal in the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
September 30, 2009. The sale of the Wireline Communications
business closed on November 6, 2009.
|
|
(2) |
|
Converted from Euro into U.S.
dollars at an exchange rate of 1 = $1.4630, which was the
noon buying rate on September 30, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Working capital consists of current
assets less cash and cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
financial assets and assets held for disposal less short-term
liabilities excluding short-term debt and current maturities of
long-term debt and liabilities associated with assets classified
as held for disposal.
|
1
OPERATING AND
FINANCIAL REVIEW FOR THE 2009 FISCAL YEAR
This discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements
and other financial information included elsewhere in this
annual report. Our audited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared on the basis of a number of policies and
assumptions more fully explained in Note 1 (Description of
Business and Basis of Presentation) and Note 2 (Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies) to our audited consolidated
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual
report.
Effective October 1, 2008, to better align our business
with its target markets, we reorganized our core business into
five operating segments: Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security, Wireless Solutions,
and Wireline Communications. Furthermore, our Management Board
changed the measure it uses to assess the operating performance
of our operating segments to Segment
Result(1)
. In July 2009, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to
sell our Wireline Communications business, which closed on
November 6, 2009. As a result of the planned sale, the
Management Board determined that Wireline Communications ceased
to be an operating segment in September 2009. All periods
presented have been recast to reflect the new segment
presentation (see note 39 to our consolidated financial
statements). All assets and liabilities of the Wireline
Communications business to be sold are presented as Assets
classified as held for disposal and Liabilities
associated with assets classified as held for disposal in
our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009,
and the results of the Wireline Communications business to be
sold are presented as Discontinued operations, net of
income taxes in our consolidated statements of operations
for all periods presented.
Overview of the
2009 Fiscal Year
During our 2009 fiscal year, which ended September 30, the
world economy entered into its deepest recession of the last
60 years. The global semiconductor market contracted
20 percent (in U.S. dollar terms) in the 2009 fiscal
year compared to the prior fiscal year, according to WSTS
(September 2009).
The following were the key developments in our business during
the 2009 fiscal year:
Financial
Results
|
|
|
|
|
Our 2009 fiscal year was significantly impacted by the overall
economic slowdown, resulting in an overall 22 percent
decrease in our revenues from 3,903 million in the
2008 fiscal year to 3,027 million in the 2009 fiscal
year. In particular, during the first half of the 2009 fiscal
year we experienced a sharp decline in revenues, while in the
second half and particularly in the fourth quarter, we
experienced a partial recovery of our revenues. All our
operating segments faced revenue decreases in the 2009 fiscal
year compared to the 2008 fiscal year. Revenues of our operating
segments in the 2009 fiscal year were as follows: Automotive
revenues were 839 million (2008 fiscal year:
1,257 million), Industrial & Multimarket
revenues were 905 million (2008 fiscal year:
1,171 million), Chip Card & Security
revenues were 341 million (2008 fiscal year:
465 million), and Wireless Solutions revenues were
917 million (2008 fiscal year:
941 million). With a revenue decline of
33 percent, our Automotive segment was affected most by the
worldwide recession, while the revenue decline in our Wireless
Solutions segment was only 3 percent, which, among others,
reflects the successful
ramp-up of
our 3G-mobilephone-platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Segment Result of our operating segments in the 2009 fiscal
year was as follows: Automotive was negative
117 million (2008 fiscal year:
105 million), Industrial & Multimarket was
35 million (2008 fiscal year:
134 million), Chip Card & Security was
negative 4 million (2008 fiscal year:
52 million), and Wireless Solutions was negative
36 million (2008 fiscal year: negative
18 million). Thus, the Segment Results for all our
operating segments decreased in the 2009 fiscal year
|
(1) We
define Segment Result as operating income (loss) excluding asset
impairments, net, restructuring charges and other related
closure costs, net,share-based compensation expense,
acquisition-related amortization and gains (losses), gains
(losses) on sales of assets, businesses, or interests in
subsidiaries, and other income (expense), including litigation
settlement costs.
2
|
|
|
|
|
compared to the 2008 fiscal year, primarily reflecting the
decrease in revenues and resulting increased idle capacity cost,
which could only be partially offset by cost savings realized
through the 2009 fiscal year. With a decrease in Segment Result
of 222 million, our Automotive segment was impacted
the most by the economic slowdown compared to our other
segments. We experienced a partial recovery in the Segment
Results during the second half of the 2009 fiscal year compared
to the first half of the 2009 fiscal year as a result of higher
revenues, which also led to lower idle capacity cost, and the
positive impact of cost savings realized under our IFX10+
cost-reduction program and from short-time work and unpaid
leave. In particular, our Wireless Solutions segment improved
its Segment Result during the second half of the 2009 fiscal
year compared to the first half of the fiscal year and the
second half of the 2008 fiscal year. For all other operating
segments, their respective Segment Results in the second half of
the 2009 fiscal year were lower than their respective Segment
Results in the second half of the 2008 fiscal year. Segment
Result of Other Operating Segments was negative
13 million (2008 fiscal year: negative
12 million) and Corporate and Elimination Segment
Result was negative 32 million (2008 fiscal year:
negative 24 million).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our loss from continuing operations before income taxes
increased by 103 million from negative
165 million in the 2008 fiscal year to negative
268 million in the 2009 fiscal year. This increase
primarily reflected decreased gross profit due to decreased
revenues and corresponding higher idle capacity cost, which was
only partly offset by decreases in research and development
expenses as well as selling, general and administrative expenses
and other operating expenses. Furthermore, the increase of
financial income by 43 million and the decrease of
financial expense by 25 million in the 2009 fiscal
year compared to the 2008 fiscal year positively impacted our
results from continuing operations before income taxes for the
2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the
2009 fiscal year was 398 million compared to
3,543 million for the prior fiscal year. Loss from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes, attributable to
Qimonda was 420 million. This amount primarily
reflected the realization of accumulated currency translation
losses totaling 188 million and charges for
provisions and allowances of 227 million, in
connection with Qimondas insolvency proceedings. The
results attributable to the Wireline Communications business in
the 2009 fiscal year which are presented in loss from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of positive
22 million only partially offset the negative impact
of Qimonda. In the 2008 fiscal year, loss from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes, was 3,543 million,
including Qimondas negative results of
2,084 million and an after tax write-down of
1,475 million in order to remeasure Qimonda to its
estimated fair value less costs to sell as of September 30,
2008. Also included in loss from discontinued operations, net of
income taxes, for the 2008 fiscal year is positive
16 million from the Wireline Communications business.
|
|
|
|
As a result of the developments described above, our net loss
decreased from 3,747 million in the 2008 fiscal year
to 671 million in the 2009 fiscal year. In
particular, we incurred significant net losses during the first
half of the 2009 fiscal year resulting from the deconsolidation
of Qimonda and the impact of Qimondas insolvency and the
effects of the economic slowdown on our business. As a result of
the partial recovery of our revenues during the second half of
the 2009 fiscal year together with our cost savings efforts and
lower charges in connection with Qimondas insolvency, our
net loss in the second half of the 2009 fiscal year
significantly decreased and we reached break even for the fourth
quarter of the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Our cash flow provided by operating activities from continuing
operations decreased from 540 million in the 2008
fiscal year to 268 million in our 2009 fiscal year.
Cash flow used in operating activities from discontinued
operations was 380 million in the 2009 fiscal year,
compared to 624 million in the prior year. The
operating cash flow used in discontinued operations primarily
reflects the losses incurred by Qimonda in the 2008 and 2009
fiscal years. The sum of our cash flows used in operating
activities (continuing and discontinued operations combined)
increased from 84 million during the 2008 fiscal year
to 112 million during the 2009 fiscal year.
|
3
Corporate
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to dealing with the impact of the economic slowdown,
our 2009 fiscal year was characterized by several measures to
improve our financial condition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2009 fiscal year, we repurchased and redeemed
notional amounts of 215 million of our exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 and 152 million of our
convertible subordinated notes due 2010. The repurchases were
made out of available cash. We realized pre tax-gains of
61 million net of transaction costs, which were
recognized in financial income for the 2009 fiscal year for
repurchases totaling 167 million of our exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 and 78 million of our
convertible subordinated notes due 2010. For repurchases and
redemptions totaling 48 million of our exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 and 74 million of our
convertible subordinated notes due 2010, we realized pre-tax
losses of 6 million, which were recognized in
financial expense during the 2009 fiscal year. As of
September 30, 2009, the outstanding notional amount of our
convertible subordinated notes due 2010 was
448 million. Our exchangeable subordinated notes due
2010 were fully redeemed as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
On May 26, 2009, through our subsidiary Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands, we issued
new convertible subordinated notes due 2014 in the notional
amount of 196 million at a discount of
7.2 percent. The subordinated notes due 2014 bear interest
of 7.5 percent and were originally convertible, at the
option of the holders, into a maximum of 74.9 million
ordinary shares of Infineon, at a conversion price of 2.61
per share through maturity. As a result of our share capital
increase described below, the conversion price has been adjusted
to 2.33 in accordance with an antidilution provision
contained in the notes. The subordinated notes due 2014 are
listed on the Open Market (Freiverkehr ) of the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
|
|
|
|
On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business to
Lantiq, affiliates of Golden Gate Private Equity Inc.
(Lantiq). The majority of the purchase price was
paid at closing on November 6, 2009, in the amount of
223 million, with up to an additional
20 million of the purchase price being payable nine
months after the closing date. The sale of the Wireline
Communications business allows us to concentrate on our four
remaining operating segments, while at the same time further
improving our balance sheet and strengthening our liquidity
position.
|
|
|
|
On July 16, 2009, we announced the launch of a rights issue
for up to 337 million shares, with a subscription price of
2.15 per share and a subscription period from
July 20, 2009 through August 3, 2009. The new shares
were offered to our existing shareholders for subscription at a
ratio of four new shares for every nine outstanding shares held.
Settlement for the new shares subscribed for under the rights
offering occurred August 5, 2009, resulting in the issuance
of 323 million new shares. In connection with the rights
issue, we entered into a backstop arrangement with a financial
investor to purchase any unsubscribed shares, subject to certain
conditions. In the second step of the rights issue, on
August 11, 2009, 14 million shares were issued to
Admiral Participations (Luxembourg) S.a.r.l., a subsidiary of a
fund managed by Apollo Global Management LLC. After the
execution of the capital increase, our share capital consisted
of 2,173 million. The capital increase resulted in
gross proceeds to us of 725 million. Costs incurred
in connection with the capital increase amounted to
45 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To address rising risks in the market environment, adverse
currency trends and partially below benchmark margins, we
implemented our cost-reduction program IFX10+ in the
third quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. Subsequent to the end of
the 2008 fiscal year, and in light of continuing adverse
developments in general economic conditions and in particular in
our industry, we identified significant further costs savings in
addition to those originally anticipated. In response to the
continued and increasingly severe deterioration in the general
market environment, additional substantial cost reductions and
cash savings were achieved. Among others, we implemented reduced
working hours and unpaid leave during the 2009 fiscal year. In
addition, we changed our bonus schemes for the 2009 fiscal year,
issued a tightened travel policy, and terminated a service
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
anniversary bonus payment scheme. Our operating expenses
(including research and development cost as well as selling,
general and administrative expense) for the 2009 fiscal year
decreased by 263 million compared to the 2008 fiscal
year. Our management believes that these savings are primarily
due to our IFX 10+ cost-reduction program. This figure includes
cost savings resulting from reduced working hours and unpaid
leave, but excludes the cost savings realized in our Wireline
Communications business, which are included in results from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes.
|
We also made significant progress in reducing the number of
employees. As of September 30, 2009, our workforce was
26,464 compared to 29,119 as of September 30, 2008, a
reduction of 9 percent. Compared to June 30, 2008,
(before we implemented the IFX10+ cost-reduction program), we
reduced our workforce by 10 percent.
|
|
|
|
|
On March 4, 2009, we sold the business of our wholly-owned
subsidiary Infineon Technologies SensoNor AS
(SensoNor), including property, plant and equipment,
inventories, and pension liabilities, and transferred employees
of this subsidiary to a newly formed company called SensoNor
Technologies AS, for cash consideration of 4 million
and one share in the capital of the new company. In addition, we
granted licenses for intellectual property and entered into a
supply agreement through December 2011 with the new company. As
a result of this transaction, we realized pre-tax losses of
17 million, which were recorded in other operating
expense in the 2009 fiscal year. We have entered into business
agreements with the new company to ensure a continued supply of
the components for our tire pressure monitoring systems until we
ramp up production at our Villach site.
|
|
|
|
On June 9, 2009, we signed an agreement with LS Industrial
Systems Co., Ltd., South Korea, to establish the joint venture
LS Power Semitech Co., Ltd., to jointly develop, produce and
market molded power modules for low power applications. We
intend to license to the joint venture intellectual property
(IP), technology and process know-how for our power
module family
CIPOStm
(Control Integrated Power System), and intend to transfer
existing CIPOS backend manufacturing equipment from Regensburg,
Germany to the joint venture. We will hold 46 percent of
the joint venture, which will be headquartered in South Korea.
|
|
|
|
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve our production
processes and improve our cost position, we:
|
|
|
|
|
|
are currently ramping up production of products using
65-nanometer technology at several manufacturing partners and
have begun to develop products based on 40-nanometer technology,
which we currently plan to have manufactured by one of our
manufacturing partners; and
|
|
|
|
are proceeding with our development agreements with
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
and its development and manufacturing partners to develop
32-nanometer technology. This agreement builds on the success of
earlier joint development and manufacturing agreements.
|
Product and
Technology Developments
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to invest in research and development and achieved a
number of significant milestones and product developments during
the 2009 fiscal year:
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
|
|
|
Further expanding our leading role in fluorescent,
high-intensity discharge (HID) and solid-state
lighting applications, we launched our next-generation smart
ballast controller for use in compact fluorescent lamps, linear
fluorescent T5 and T8 lamps, dimmable fluorescent lamps and
emergency lighting. Today, around one third of all energy
consumption is electrical energy of which around 15 percent
is consumed by lighting, creating a growing demand for efficient
lighting systems. The new lamp ballast controller has been
selected by a number of the worlds leading lighting
manufacturers.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
We and Robert Bosch GmbH (Bosch) are widening our
cooperation to include power semiconductors. The collaboration
between the companies has two key aspects. First, Bosch licenses
from us certain manufacturing processes for power
semiconductors specifically, for low-voltage power
MOSFETs (metal oxide semiconductor field-effect
transistors) along with the requisite manufacturing
technologies. Second, the collaboration includes a second-source
agreement. Parallel to Boschs own semiconductor
manufacturing in Reutlingen, Germany, we will produce components
developed on the basis of these processes and will supply Bosch
with these components. We and Bosch are also working jointly on
the development of enabling technologies for the production of
power semiconductors.
|
|
|
|
With the 600V
CoolMOStm
C6 series, our latest high-performance power MOSFETs, we enable
energy conversion applications such as PFC (Power Factor
Correction) or PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) stages to be made
significantly more energy efficient.
CoolMOStm
C6 devices target various energy efficient applications such as
power supplies or adapters for PCs, notebooks or mobile phones,
lighting (HID) products, as well as displays (LCD or Plasma TV)
and consumer applications like gaming consoles. Our latest power
semiconductor generation allows for highly reliable end products
compliant with todays high efficiency requirements and
government regulations.
|
Security
|
|
|
|
|
We have maintained our strong position in the chip card and
security IC market. U.S. market research company
Frost & Sullivan named us, for the twelfth consecutive
year, as the top supplier of chip card semiconductors. In 2008,
our market share was 26 percent of the overall chip card IC
(integrated circuit) market, which totals about 2.4 billion
U.S. dollar according to Frost & Sullivan. Our
strong market position is particularly driven by our leadership
in the Government Identification (ID) and payment
market segments.
|
In government ID applications, roughly half of all government ID
documents (excluding the China national ID project) issued in
2008 incorporated one of our security chips. Government ID
applications include electronic documents, such as passports,
national ID cards, health cards, drivers licenses and social
security cards. Today, our products are used in the public
domain of about one third of the 192 UN member states. A key
success factor in this sensitive market is the ability to
provide long-term security and robust, high-quality products
with excellent contactless performance. In the payment market we
are also a key partner of the secure chip card industry. We are
a major supplier for many of the worlds largest financial
card applications, including credit and debit card programs in
France, Germany, the UK and Korea.
|
|
|
|
|
Our position as key innovator in the chip card industry was
again recognized when we were awarded the 2008 Sesame Award in
the category of Best Hardware for our latest 16-bit
security microcontroller family, SLE 78. We received the award
because the new chips integrate a highly innovative
self-checking security mechanism called
Integrity Guard which we specifically
developed for chip card and security applications. This is the
fifth time we have received this prestigious award.
|
Communications
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2009, we won the Innovation Award of German Industry
for the best technological innovation in the category of
large-scale enterprises for our
X-GOLDtm
101 mobile phone chip. This chip enables the production of a
simple mobile phone from a single-chip, cutting the
manufacturing cost of mobile phones by over 30 percent. It
is the second time we have received this prestigious award.
|
|
|
|
We announced our third-generation ultra-low-cost
(ULC) mobile phone chips. The
X-GOLDtm
110 is the industrys most integrated and cost-effective
one-chip solution for GSM/GPRS ultra low-cost phones. The bill
of material for mobile phone manufacturers is approximately
20 percent
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
lower compared to existing GSM/GPRS solutions. The new platform
supports color display, MP3 playback, FM radio, and USB
charging, and can be used in Dual-SIM and camera solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our RF business, we announced the sampling of the second
generation of our Long-Term-Evolution (LTE) RF transceiver. The
SMARTitm
LU is a single-chip-65-nanometer CMOS RF transceiver providing
LTE/3G/2G functionality with digital baseband interface in LTE
networks for data rates up to 150 megabit per second. The latest
revision of
SMARTitm
LU adds LTE FDD/TDD mode and new frequency bands supporting
leading operators in North America and China.
SMARTitm
LU will ship in volume in the second half of the 2010 calendar
year. In addition, we announced the third generation of our 3G
RF transceiver family
SMARTitm
UE. The
SMARTitm
UEmicro is optimized for lowest cost 3G designs and enables a
40 percent lower bill of material than available solutions
on the market.
SMARTitm
UEmicro meets the feature requirements and cost targets of
emerging 3G mass markets in China and India. Volume shipments
are expected to start in the first half of the 2010 calendar
year.
|
Our
Business
We design, develop, manufacture and market a broad range of
semiconductors and complete system solutions used in a wide
variety of microelectronic applications, including computer
systems, telecommunications systems, consumer goods, automotive
products, industrial automation and control systems, and chip
card applications. Our products include standard commodity
components, full-custom devices, semi-custom devices, and
application-specific components for analog, digital, and
mixed-signal applications. We have operations, investments, and
customers located primarily in Europe, Asia and North America.
Our core business is currently organized in four operating
segments: Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, Chip
Card & Security, and Wireless Solutions:
|
|
|
|
|
The Automotive segment designs, develops, manufactures and
markets semiconductors for use in automotive applications.
Together with its product portfolio, we offer corresponding
system know-how and support to our customers.
|
|
|
|
The Industrial & Multimarket segment designs,
develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and complete
system solutions primarily for use in industrial applications
and in applications with customer-specific product requirements.
|
|
|
|
The Chip Card & Security segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of security controllers
and security memories for chip card and security applications.
|
|
|
|
The Wireless Solutions segment designs, develops, manufactures
and markets a wide range of ICs, other semiconductors and
complete system solutions for wireless communication
applications.
|
Our current segment structure reflects a reorganization of our
operations effective October 1, 2008. To better align our
business with our target markets, we reorganized our core
business into five operating segments: Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket, Chip Card &
Security, Wireless Solutions, and Wireline Communications. In
July 2009, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell
our Wireline Communications business, which closed on
November 6, 2009. As a result of the planned sale, our
Management Board determined that the Wireline Communications
business ceased to be an operating segment in September 2009,
and the results of the Wireline Communications business are
reported as discontinued operations in our consolidated
statements of operations for all periods presented. Segment
results for all periods presented have been recast to be
consistent with the current reporting structure and
presentation, as well as to facilitate analysis of operating
segment information. Assets and liabilities of the Wireline
Communications business in the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009 are classified as held for
disposal.
We have two additional segments for reporting purposes, our
Other Operating Segments, which includes remaining activities
for certain product lines that have been disposed of, and other
business activities, and our Corporate and Eliminations segment,
which contains items not allocated to our
7
operating segments, such as certain corporate headquarters
costs, strategic investments, unabsorbed excess capacity and
restructuring costs.
In addition, we currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in
Qimonda, which was carved-out in 2006. On January 23, 2009,
Qimonda and its wholly owned subsidiary Qimonda Dresden
GmbH & Co. oHG (Qimonda Dresden) filed an
application to commence insolvency proceedings, and formal
insolvency proceedings were opened on April 1, 2009. Formal
insolvency proceedings have also been commenced by several
additional subsidiaries of Qimonda in various jurisdictions. The
final resolution of the insolvency proceedings, including the
final disposition of the remaining assets and liabilities of
Qimonda, cannot be predicted at this time. As a result of the
application, we deconsolidated Qimonda during the second quarter
of the 2009 fiscal year. During the second quarter of the 2008
fiscal year, we committed to a plan to dispose of Qimonda. As a
result, the assets and liabilities of Qimonda in the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, were
classified as held for disposal, and the results of
Qimonda are reported in our consolidated statements of
operations as discontinued operations through deconsolidation
for all periods presented.
The Semiconductor
Industry and Factors that Impact Our Business
Our business and the semiconductor industry generally are highly
cyclical and characterized by constant and rapid technological
change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving
standards, short product life-cycles and wide fluctuations in
product supply and demand.
Cyclicality
The market for semiconductors has historically been volatile.
Supply and demand have fluctuated cyclically and have caused
pronounced fluctuations in prices and margins. According to WSTS
(November 2009), the overall market growth (in
U.S. dollar terms) compared to the previous year was
8.9 percent in 2006 and 3.2 percent in 2007, before
decreasing by 2.8 percent in 2008. WSTS predicts that the
overall market will contract by approximately 11 percent in
the 2009 calendar year.
The industrys cyclicality results from a complex set of
factors, including, in particular, fluctuations in demand for
the end products that use semiconductors and fluctuations in
manufacturing capacity. This cyclicality is especially
pronounced in the memory portion of the industry. Semiconductor
manufacturing facilities (so-called fabrication facilities, or
fabs) can take several years to plan, construct, and
begin operations. Semiconductor manufacturers have in the past
made capital investments in plant and equipment during periods
of favorable market conditions, in response to anticipated
demand growth for semiconductors. If more than one of these
newly built fabs comes on-line at about the same time, the
supply of chips to the market can be vastly increased. Without
sustained growth in demand, this cycle has typically led to
manufacturing over-capacity and oversupply of products, which in
turn has led to sharp drops in semiconductor prices. When prices
drop, manufacturers have in the past cut back on investing in
new fabs. As demand for chips grows over time, without
additional fabs coming on-line, prices tend to rise, leading to
a new cycle of investment. The semiconductor industry has
generally been slow to react to declines in demand, due to its
capital-intensive nature and the need to make commitments for
equipment purchases well in advance of planned expansion.
We attempt to mitigate the impact of cyclicality by investing in
manufacturing capacities throughout the cycle and entering into
alliances and foundry manufacturing arrangements that provide
flexibility in responding to changes in the cycle.
Substantial
Capital and Research & Development
Expenditures
Semiconductor manufacturing is very capital-intensive. The
manufacturing capacities that are essential to maintain a
competitive cost position require large capital investments. The
top 10 capital spenders in the industry, according to IC
Insights, account for approximately 60 percent of the
industrys projected 2009 capital spending budgets.
Manufacturing processes and product designs are based on
leading-edge technologies that require considerable research and
development expenditures. A high percentage of the
8
cost of operating a fab is fixed; therefore, increases or
decreases in capacity utilization can have a significant effect
on profitability.
Because pricing, for commodity products in particular, is
market-driven and largely beyond our control, a key factor in
achieving and maintaining profitability is to continually lower
our per-unit
costs by reducing total costs and by increasing unit production
output through productivity improvements.
To reduce total costs, we intend to continue to seek to share
the costs of our research and development (R&D)
and manufacturing with third parties, either by establishing
alliances or through the use of foundry facilities for
manufacturing. We believe that cooperation in alliances for
R&D, as well as manufacturing and foundry partnerships,
provide us with a number of important benefits, including the
sharing of risks and costs, reductions in our own capital
requirements, acquisitions of technical know-how, and access to
additional production capacities. Our principal alliances are
with the International Semiconductor Development Alliance
(ISDA), a technology alliance among IBM,
GlobalFoundries Inc., Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd.
(Chartered Semiconductor), Freescale Seminconductor,
Inc., NEC Corporation, Samsung Electronics Ltd.,
STMicroelectronics NV, Toshiba Corporation and Infineon for CMOS
development and manufacturing at 45-nanometer and 32-nanometer
process technologies. We have established foundry relationships
with United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) for
130-nanometer, 90-nanometer and 65-nanometer manufacturing as
well as with Chartered Semiconductor and Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (TSMC) for 65-nanometer
manufacturing. Further, we announced in November 2009 the
signing of a joint development agreement for 65-nanometer
embedded Flash technology with TSMC.
In the backend field, STMicroelectronics NV, STATS ChipPAC Ltd.
and Infineon are jointly developing the next-generation of
embedded Wafer-Level Ball Grid Array (eWLB)
technology, based on our first-generation technology, for use in
manufacturing future-generation semiconductor packages. This
builds on our existing eWLB packaging technology, which we have
licensed to our development partners. The new R&D effort,
for which the resulting IP will be jointly owned by the three
companies, will focus on using both sides of a reconstituted
wafer to provide solutions for semiconductor devices with a
higher integration level and a greater number of contact
elements.
We expect to continue to increase unit production output through
improvements in manufacturing, which is achieved by producing
chips with smaller structure sizes (more bits per chip) and by
producing more chips per silicon wafer (by using larger wafers).
Currently, a substantial portion of our capacity is based on
130-nanometer and 90-nanometer structure sizes. Our
130-nanometer process technology, with up to eight layers of
copper metallization, is in volume production at several
manufacturing sites, including our Dresden facility. Additional
130-nanometer process options have been developed to fulfill the
needs of specialty applications. Our 90-nanometer technology is
in production. We are currently manufacturing 65-nanometer
technology at several foundry partners and are developing
products based on 40-nanometer technology which we currently
plan to manufacture initially at one of our manufacturing
partners.
About half of our internal fab capacity is used for the
manufacture of power semiconductors used in automotive and
industrial applications. We have power semiconductor
manufacturing sites in Regensburg, Germany, in Villach, Austria
and in Kulim, Malaysia. We continue to focus on innovation for
power semiconductors, introducing power copper metallization and
special processes to fabricate ever thinner wafers to optimize
electrical resistance.
Technological
Development and Competition
Sales prices per unit are volatile and generally decline over
time due to technological developments and competitive pressure.
Although logic products generally have a certain degree of
application specification, unit sales prices for logic products
typically decline over time as technology develops.
We aim to offset the effects of declining unit sales prices on
total revenue by optimizing product mix, by increasing unit
sales volume and by continually reducing
per-unit
production costs. The growth in volume
9
depends in part on productivity improvements in manufacturing,
for example by moving to ever-smaller structure sizes.
Seasonality
Our sales are affected by seasonal and cyclical influences, with
sales historically strongest in our fourth fiscal quarter. These
short cycles are influenced by longer cycles that are a response
to innovative technical solutions from our customers that
incorporate our products. The short-term and mid-term
cyclicality of our sales reflects the supply and demand
fluctuations for the products that contain our semiconductors.
If anticipated sales or shipments do not occur when expected,
expenses and inventory levels in a given quarter can be
disproportionately high, and our results of operations for that
quarter, and potentially for future quarters, may be adversely
affected.
Product
Development Cycles
For our products, the cycle for test, evaluation and adoption of
our products by customers before the start of volume production
can range from several months to more than one year. Due to this
lengthy cycle, we may experience significant delays from the
time we incur expenses for R&D, marketing efforts, and
investments in inventory, to the time we generate corresponding
revenue, if any.
Acquisition
and Divestiture Strategy
A key element of our core business strategy is to seek to reduce
the time required to develop new technologies and products and
bring them to market, and to optimize our existing product
offerings, market coverage, engineering workforce, and
technological capabilities. We plan to continue to evaluate
strategic opportunities as they arise, including business
combination transactions, strategic relationships, capital
investments, and the purchase or sale of assets or businesses.
Intellectual
Property
Due to the high-technology nature of the semiconductor industry,
Intellectual Property (IP), meaning intangible
assets relating to proprietary technology, is of significant
importance. We also derive modest revenues from the licensing of
our IP, generally pursuant to cross licensing agreements. Our IP
rights include patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks,
utility models and designs. The subjects of our patents
primarily relate to IC designs and process technologies. We
believe that our intellectual property is a valuable asset not
only to protect our investment in technology but also a vital
prerequisite for cross licensing agreements with third parties.
As of September 30, 2009, we owned more than 20,800 patent
applications and patents (both referred to as
patents below) in over 40 countries throughout the
world. These patents belong to approximately 8,150 patent
families (each patent family containing all patents
originating from the same invention). 1,900 of those patent
applications and patents (approximately 820 patent families)
were transferred to Lantiq upon the closing of the sale of our
Wireline Communications business on November 6, 2009.
We record assets on our balance sheet for self-developed IP.
Costs for development activities may be capitalized if
development costs can be measured reliably, the product or
process is technically and commercially feasible, future
economic benefits are probable, and we intend, and have
sufficient resources, to complete development and use or sell
the asset. The costs capitalized include the cost of materials,
direct labor and directly attributable general overhead
expenditures that serve to prepare the asset for use. Costs of
research activities which do not fulfill the criteria for
capitalization are expensed as incurred. IP licensed from others
or acquired through a business combination is also reflected on
our balance sheet, and reduced through amortization over its
expected useful life. The value of such acquired IP is often
complex and difficult to estimate.
10
Challenges
that Lie Ahead
Going forward, our success will remain highly dependent on our
ability to stay at the leading edge of technology development,
and to continue to optimize our product portfolio. We must
achieve both objectives to ensure that we have the flexibility
to react to fluctuations in market demand for different types of
semiconductor products. We believe that the ability to offer and
the flexibility to manufacture a broad portfolio of products
will be increasingly important to our long-term success in many
markets in the semiconductor industry. Establishing and
maintaining advantageous technology, development and
manufacturing alliances, including the use of third-party
foundries, and continuing our efforts to broaden our product
portfolio will make it easier for us to respond to changes in
market conditions and to improve our financial performance.
Semiconductor
Market Conditions in the 2009 Fiscal Year
According to WSTS (September 2009), the global semiconductor
market contracted (in U.S. dollar terms) by 20 percent
through the first nine months of the 2009 calendar year compared
to the same period in the prior year, following a market
contraction of 2.8 percent in the 2008 calendar year. In
November 2009, WSTS predicted the global semiconductor market
would shrink by approximately 11 percent in the full 2009
calendar year. Sales in North America are expected to decrease
by 1 percent and in Europe by 24 percent in the 2009
calendar year, according to WSTS. The semiconductor market in
Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan) is expected to contract by
7 percent; the Japanese market is expected to contract by
21 percent compared to the 2008 calendar year. Sales of
non-memory products (logic chips, analog, and discretes), which
accounted for 81 percent of the entire market in the first
nine months of the 2009 calendar year, are predicted to decrease
by 12 percent compared with the 2008 calendar year. Sales
of memory products are predicted to decline by 8 percent
compared with the 2008 calendar year. In the 2008 calendar year,
the memory market contracted by 20 percent (WSTS, November
2009).
11
Results of
Operations
Results of
Operations as a Percentage of Revenue
The following table presents the various line items in our
consolidated statements of operations expressed as percentages
of revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September
30,(1)
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
(67.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(66.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(78.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Financial expense
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(90.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(96.0
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(22.2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
%
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(75.2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(1) |
Columns may not add up due to rounding.
|
Reorganization
Our organizational structure for the period through
March 31, 2008, became effective on May 1, 2006,
following the legal separation of our memory products business
into the stand-alone legal company Qimonda. Effective
March 31, 2008, the results of Qimonda until
deconsolidation are reported as discontinued operations in our
consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented,
and the assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been classified
as held for disposal in the consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2008.
Following the completion of the Qimonda carve-out, certain
corporate overhead expenses are no longer apportioned to Qimonda
and are instead allocated to our segments. In addition, Other
Operating Segments includes revenue and earnings that our
200-millimeter production facility in Dresden recorded from the
sale of wafers to Qimonda under a foundry agreement, which was
cancelled during the 2008 fiscal year. The Corporate and
Eliminations segment reflects the elimination of these revenue
and earnings. Also, effective October 1, 2007, we record
gains and losses from sales of investments in marketable debt
and equity securities in the Corporate and Eliminations segment.
Effective October 1, 2008, to better align our business
with our target markets, we reorganized our core business into
five operating segments: Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security,
12
Wireless Solutions and Wireline Communications. On July 7,
2009, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to sell our
Wireline Communications business which closed on
November 6, 2009. As a result of the planned sale, our
Management Board determined that the Wireline Communications
business ceased to be an operating segment in September 2009,
and the results of the Wireline Communications business are
reported as discontinued operations in our consolidated
statements of operations for all periods presented, and the
assets and liabilities of the Wireline Communications Business
in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009
are classified as held for disposal.
Segment results for all periods presented have been recast to
be consistent with the current reporting structure and
presentation, as well as to facilitate analysis of operating
segment information.
Revenue
We generate our revenues primarily from the sale of our
semiconductor products and systems solutions. Our semiconductor
products include a wide array of chips and components used in
electronic applications ranging from wireless communication
systems, to chip cards, automotive electronics, and industrial
applications.
We generated the majority of our product revenues in the 2009
fiscal year through our direct sales force, with approximately
20 percent of revenues derived from sales made through
distributors.
We derive our modest license revenue from royalties and license
fees earned on technology that we own and license to third
parties. This enables us to recover a portion of our research
and development expenses, and also often allows us to gain
access to manufacturing capacity at foundries through joint
licensing and capacity reservation arrangements.
Our revenues fluctuate in response to a combination of factors,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the market prices for our products, including fluctuations in
currency exchange rates that affect our prices;
|
|
|
|
our overall product mix and sales volumes;
|
|
|
|
the stage of our products in their respective life cycles;
|
|
|
|
the effects of competition and competitive pricing strategies;
|
|
|
|
governmental regulations influencing our markets (e.g., energy
efficiency regulations); and
|
|
|
|
the global and regional economic cycles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
%
|
Of which:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License income
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
Effect of foreign exchange over prior year
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
%
|
Impact of acquisitions over prior year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
In the 2008 fiscal year, revenues increased primarily as a
result of the revenue increase in the Wireless Solutions
segment, partially offset by the revenue decline in other
operating segments due to the sale of our HDD business to LSI in
April 2008. The slight revenue decreases in our Automotive and
our Industrial & Multimarket segments were offset by
revenue increases in our Chip Card & Security segment.
13
In the 2009 fiscal year, revenues decreased by 22 percent
compared to the 2008 fiscal year, primarily due to the economic
slowdown. Revenues decreased across all of our segments.
The strength of the Euro (primarily against the
U.S. dollar) during the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years
negatively impacted revenue, while the partial recovery of the
U.S. dollar against the Euro in the 2009 fiscal year
positively impacted our revenues. The effect of foreign exchange
over the prior year is calculated as the estimated change in
current year revenues if the average exchange rate for the
preceding year were applied as a constant rate in the current
year.
Revenues for the 2008 fiscal year include the effect of the
acquisition of the mobility products business from LSI from
October 25, 2007 and Primarion Inc. from April 28,
2008. The impact of acquisitions over the prior fiscal year
reflects the increase in revenue resulting from business
acquisitions since the beginning of the prior fiscal year, and
in particular the inclusion of a full-year consolidation of
revenue from such acquisition in the year after the initial
acquisition.
Actual
Revenues in the 2009 Fiscal Year Compared to Previously Reported
Outlook
When we initially presented our outlook for the 2009 fiscal
year, in December 2008, our visibility with respect to economic
developments in the 2009 fiscal year was very limited. Based on
forecasts at that time, we forecast that total revenues in the
2009 fiscal year would decrease by at least 15 percent
compared to the 2008 fiscal year. In April 2009, we revised our
outlook for the 2009 fiscal year; however, considerable
uncertainties regarding the economic situation remained. Based
on the results for the first six months of the 2009 fiscal year,
as of April we forecasted revenues for the 2009 fiscal year to
decrease by more than 20 percent compared to the 2008
fiscal year.
As expected, the economic slowdown during the 2009 fiscal year
resulted in revenue decreases in all our segments. As we
forecasted in April 2009 in our revised outlook for the 2009
fiscal year, our overall revenue decreased by 22 percent in
the 2009 fiscal year compared to the 2008 fiscal year. Revenues
of each of our operating segments, other than Wireless
Solutions, decreased by more than 20 percent each in the
2009 fiscal year compared to the 2008 fiscal year. As we
forecasted, the economic slowdown had the least impact on our
Wireless Solutions segment, which experienced a decrease of
revenues of only 3 percent in the 2009 fiscal year compared
to the 2008 fiscal year.
Revenue by
Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
%
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
%
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
%
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
%
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
%
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
%
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
%
|
Wireless
Solutions(1)
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
%
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
%
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
%
|
Other
Operating
Segments(2)
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
%
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
Corporate and
Eliminations(3)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
%
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
%
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes revenues of 30 million,
10 million and 1 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, from sales of wireless communication applications
to Qimonda.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes revenues of 189 million and
79 million for fiscal years ended September 30,
2007, and 2008, respectively, from sales of wafers from
Infineons 200-millimeter facility in Dresden to Qimonda
under a foundry agreement.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes the elimination of revenues of 219 million,
89 million and 1 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, since these sales were not part of the Qimonda
disposal plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive In the 2008 fiscal year, revenues
were 1,257 million, and remained broadly unchanged
compared to 1,267 million in the 2007 fiscal year.
Higher sales volumes partially offset the continued pricing
pressures caused by technological developments and competition.
In the 2009 fiscal year, revenues were 839 million, a
decrease of 33 percent compared to the 2008
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
fiscal year. The revenue decline was in line with the volume
reduction in the automobile market driven by the economic
downturn. In addition, we saw a market shift to smaller-sized
cars with lower semiconductor content triggered by national
car-scrap bonus programs and an economic stimulus program in
China. During the second half of the 2009 fiscal year, revenues
of the Automotive segment partially recovered compared to the
first half of the 2009 fiscal year, however revenues in the
second half of the 2009 fiscal year were still significantly
lower compared to revenues in the second half of the 2008 fiscal
year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket In the
2008 fiscal year, revenues slightly decreased due to the sale of
an interest in Infineon Technologies Bipolar GmbH &
Co. KG (Bipolar) to Siemens AG, which is being
consolidated under the equity method of accounting effective
October 1, 2007. Revenues of the remaining businesses
increased as higher sales volumes more than offset the continued
pricing pressures caused by technological developments and
competition. Growth in revenues was driven primarily by
continued strong demand for industrial high power applications,
and increases in sales of multimarket applications. In the 2009
fiscal year, revenues amounted to 905 million and
were 23 percent below revenues for the 2008 fiscal year.
Against the background of the global economic crisis,
particularly in consumer oriented markets like computing,
communication and automotive, sales declined. The primary causes
for the decline were a significant slump in demand by
end-consumers as well as stock clearance within the value chain.
The industrial business showed a comparatively slight decline in
sales compared to the 2008 fiscal year. Economic stimulus plans
throughout the world helped to partially counterbalance the
impact of the economic crisis in the industrial segment.
Revenues increased in the second half of the 2009 fiscal year
compared to the first half. In the fourth quarter of our 2009
fiscal year, revenues increased significantly compared to the
third quarter of the 2009 fiscal year. This increase primarily
reflected the seasonality typical in consumer oriented markets
and was comparable to the growth rate in the fourth quarter of
the 2008 fiscal year compared to the third quarter of the 2008
fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security In the 2008
fiscal year, revenues were 465 million, an increase
of 6 percent compared to 438 million in the 2007
fiscal year. This increase primarily reflected growing demand
for government ID applications, especially the introduction of
electronic passports, as well as market share gains in
Pay-TV and
payment applications. In the 2009 fiscal year, revenues were
341 million, a decrease of 27 percent compared
to the 2008 fiscal year. This decrease was driven by weaker
demand for government ID as well as for platform security,
Pay-TV,
mobile communication and payment applications, caused primarily
by the economic and financial crisis. Investments in
infrastructure improvements were particularly delayed due to the
crisis, which resulted in a slow down, for example, in the
migration towards high-end products in payment applications.
Additionally, the economic crisis negatively impacted worldwide
travel activities, leading to significantly lower end-customer
demand for electronic passports. In the fourth quarter of the
2009 fiscal year, revenue increased compared to the third
quarter of the 2009 fiscal year. This increase was significantly
higher than the increase in the fourth quarter of the 2008
fiscal year compared to the third quarter of the 2008 fiscal
year. This was mainly driven by stronger demand for
communication chips as well as a recovery of market demand for
platform security chips in laptops and PCs.
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions In the 2008 fiscal year,
revenues were 941 million, an increase of
48 percent compared to 637 million in the 2007
fiscal year, primarily resulting from a strong increase in
mobile phone platform shipments and the consolidation of the
mobility products business acquired from LSI. In the 2009 fiscal
year, revenues were 917 million, a slight decrease of
3 percent compared to the 2008 fiscal year. Despite the
turbulent market environment, particularly in the first half of
the 2009 fiscal year, the segment succeeded in stabilizing
revenues at the previous fiscal years level. Our
innovative ULC-, Entry Phone-, UMTS- and HSPA solutions were
positively received and had strong market momentum.
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Segments In the 2007 and 2008
fiscal years, revenues comprised mainly inter-segment revenues
of wafers from our 200-millimeter facility in Dresden to Qimonda
under a foundry agreement, which are eliminated in the Corporate
and Eliminations segment. Effective
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2007, Qimonda canceled the foundry agreement
with us, resulting in a significant decline in revenue during
the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years. The last wafers were delivered
to Qimonda in May 2008. The majority of the revenues in the 2009
fiscal year were derived from our HDD business which we sold to
LSI in April 2008, and which were also included in the revenues
of other operating segments in the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years.
|
Revenue by
Region and Customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
%
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
%
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
%
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
%
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
%
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
%
|
North America
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
%
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
%
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
%
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
%
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
%
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
%
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
%
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The absolute and relative increase in the share of revenues in
Asia/Pacific in the 2008 fiscal year was primarily due to the
acquisition of the mobility products business from LSI and
higher shipments of mobile phone platforms solutions to
customers in Asia/Pacific in our Wireless Solutions segment.
The regional distribution of revenues in the 2009 fiscal year
changed slightly compared to the 2008 fiscal year, primarily
reflecting changes in the revenues of the segments. The shift in
the regional distribution from Germany, Other Europe, and North
America to Asia/Pacific resulted primarily from the significant
revenue decreases of our Automotive segment, whose customers are
based largely in Germany, Other Europe and North America.
Furthermore, increased revenues of our Wireless Solutions
segment in Asia/Pacific during the 2009 fiscal year compared to
the 2008 fiscal year contributed to the changes in the regional
distribution of revenues.
No single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of
our revenues in the 2009 fiscal year, while our top 25 customers
accounted for 72 percent of our revenues.
Cost of Goods
Sold and Gross Margin
Our cost of goods sold consists principally of:
|
|
|
|
|
direct materials, which consist principally of raw wafer costs;
|
|
|
|
labor costs;
|
|
|
|
overhead, including maintenance of production equipment,
indirect materials, utilities and royalties;
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization, including amortization of
capitalized development cost;
|
|
|
|
subcontracted expenses for assembly and test services;
|
|
|
|
production support, including facilities, utilities, quality
control, automated systems and management functions; and
|
|
|
|
foundry production costs.
|
In addition to factors that affect our revenue, our gross margin
is impacted by:
|
|
|
|
|
factory utilization rates and related idle capacity costs;
|
|
|
|
amortization of purchased intangible assets and capitalized
development costs;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
product warranty costs;
|
|
|
|
provisions for excess or obsolete inventories; and
|
|
|
|
government grants, which are recognized over the remaining
useful life of the related manufacturing assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
%
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
%
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
68
|
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue (gross margin)
|
|
|
32
|
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
|
%
|
We include in cost of goods sold the cost of inventory purchased
from our joint ventures and other associated and related
companies. Our purchases from these associated and related
companies amounted to 47 million,
148 million and 138 million in the 2007,
2008 and 2009 fiscal years, respectively.
During the 2008 fiscal year our gross margin slightly increased
primarily as a result of productivity measures. In the 2009
fiscal year our gross margin decreased significantly from
34 percent to 22 percent. In particular during the
first half of the 2009 fiscal year, lower sales volumes and
significantly higher idle capacity costs, reflecting fixed cost
in production that could not be reduced proportionately to the
reduced sales volume, resulted in a significant decline of our
gross margin. The increased sales volumes during the second half
of the 2009 fiscal year compared to the first half of the 2009
fiscal year resulted in a partial recovery of our gross margin
in the second half of the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive In the 2008 fiscal year, gross
profit of the segment remained broadly unchanged compared to the
2007 fiscal year due to measures to increase productivity and
despite an increase in idle capacity cost. Compared to the 2008
fiscal year, gross profit in the 2009 fiscal year decreased due
to volume decline and further increasing costs for idle capacity.
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket In the
2008 fiscal year, gross profit of the segment remained broadly
unchanged compared to the 2007 fiscal year due to measures to
increase productivity and despite an increase in idle capacity
cost. Due to significantly lower revenues and higher idle
capacity cost in the 2009 fiscal year, gross profit declined in
the 2009 fiscal year compared to the 2008 fiscal year. The
decrease in gross profit was limited by structural improvements
in our product portfolio and cost and process enhancements as
well as by our significant savings measures. Price erosion
affecting our products in the 2009 fiscal year remained on the
same level as in the 2008 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security In the 2008
fiscal year, gross profit of the segment increased significantly
primarily due to the increase in revenue as well as changes in
product mix, driven by our differentiation strategy in the
product portfolio. In the 2009 fiscal year, gross profit
decreased in line with revenues and due to higher idle capacity
cost, reflecting reduced loading of the manufacturing facilities.
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions In the 2008 fiscal year,
gross profit of the segment increased compared to that of the
2007 fiscal year, primarily due to the revenue increases, cost
savings and productivity measures, despite the negative impact
of currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the
Euro. In the 2009 fiscal year gross profit of the segment
decreased compared to the 2008 fiscal year, reflecting higher
idle capacity cost resulting from lower factory loading.
|
Research and
Development Expenses
R&D expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for
R&D personnel, material costs, depreciation and maintenance
of equipment used in our R&D efforts, and contracted
technology development
17
costs. R&D expenses also include our joint technology
development arrangements with partners. Costs of research
activities undertaken with the prospect of gaining new
scientific or technical knowledge and understanding are expensed
as incurred. Costs for development activities, whereby research
findings are applied to a plan or design for the production of
new or substantially improved products and processes, are
capitalized if development costs can be measured reliably, the
product or process is technically and commercially feasible,
future economic benefits are probable, and we intend, and have
sufficient resources, to complete development and use or sell
the asset. The costs capitalized include the cost of materials,
direct labor and directly attributable general overhead
expenditure that serves to prepare the asset for use.
We continue to focus our investments on the development of
leading-edge manufacturing technologies and products with high
potential for growth and profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
%
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
17
|
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
|
%
|
Government subsidies
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
Capitalized development costs
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Percentage of research and development expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
|
%
|
Some of our R&D projects qualify for subsidies from local
and regional governments where we do business. If the criteria
to receive a grant are met, the subsidies received reduce
R&D expenses over the project term as expenses are incurred.
In the 2008 fiscal year R&D expenses decreased by
15 million or 2 percent compared to the 2007
fiscal year, and further decreased in the 2009 fiscal year by
138 million or 23 percent compared to the 2008
fiscal year. The absolute decline during our 2009 fiscal year
resulted from our IFX10+ cost-reduction program, savings from
short-time work and unpaid leave, and deferred R&D
activities. Furthermore, reduced expenses reflecting lower
profit-related bonuses contributed to cost reduction in the 2009
fiscal year. Continued increases in our R&D efficiency also
contributed to the decline of R&D expenses in the 2009
fiscal year compared to the 2008 fiscal year. We believe that
the cost savings achieved have not harmed our technological
competitive position.
We capitalized development costs of 22 million,
38 million and 43 million in the 2007,
2008 and 2009 fiscal year, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive In the 2008 fiscal year, R&D
expenses remained stable as a percentage of revenues and
decreased in absolute terms. In the 2009 fiscal year, R&D
cost was reduced in absolute terms; however R&D expense
slightly increased as a percentage of revenue due to the
significant reduction in revenue.
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket In the
2008 fiscal year, R&D expenses remained stable as a
percentage of revenues and decreased in absolute terms. R&D
expenses in the 2009 fiscal year declined in absolute terms, but
increased as a percentage of revenues due to the significant
reduction in revenue.
|
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security In the 2008
fiscal year, R&D expenses increased both as a percentage of
revenues and in absolute terms. In the 2009 fiscal year,
R&D expenses decreased strongly. As a percentage of
revenues, R&D expenses of the segment increased slightly
due to the reduction in revenues.
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions In the 2008 fiscal year,
despite the acquisition of the mobility products business from
LSI, R&D expenses decreased as efficiency gains and cost
reduction measures initiated during the 2007 fiscal year for the
first time were taking effect for a full fiscal year. As a
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
percentage of revenue, R&D expenses declined sharply,
mainly driven by the revenue increase. In the 2009 fiscal year,
R&D expenses significantly decreased in both relative and
absolute terms.
|
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits for
personnel engaged in sales and marketing activities, costs of
customer samples, other marketing incentives, and related
marketing expenses.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and benefits for administrative personnel,
non-manufacturing related overhead costs, and consultancy, legal
and other fees for professional services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
Changes
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
%
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
%
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
12
|
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
|
%
|
The
year-on-year
increase in absolute terms in the 2008 fiscal year primarily
reflects increased selling expenses following the acquisition of
the mobility products business from LSI. In the 2009 fiscal year
selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by
125 million or 24 percent compared to the 2008
fiscal year. This decrease reflects cost savings as a result of
our IFX10+ cost-reduction program, short-time work, and unpaid
leave. Additionally, the reversal of bonus provisions and lower
bonus and incentive expenses due to our 2009 fiscal year results
contributed to the decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the 2009 fiscal year. As a percentage
of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses
remained broadly unchanged for the 2009 fiscal year compared to
the 2008 fiscal year.
Other
Operating Income and Other Operating Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
%
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
Other Operating Income. In the 2007 fiscal
year, other operating income consisted primarily of gains of
17 million from the sale of the Polymer Optical fiber
(POF) business to Avago Technologies Ltd.
(Avago), and gains of 3 million from the
sale of the Sci-Worx business to Silicon Image Inc. Other
operating income increased by 83 million from
37 million in the 2007 fiscal year to
120 million in the 2008 fiscal year, and decreased to
29 million in the 2009 fiscal year. Other operating
income in the 2008 fiscal year related primarily to the gains of
80 million from the sale of 40 percent of our
interest in Bipolar to Siemens, the sale of our HDD business to
LSI, and the sale of our bulk acoustic wave filter business
(BAW) to Avago. Additionally, we realized gains from
disposals of long-term assets of 4 million in the
2008 fiscal year. Included in other operating income for the
2009 fiscal year were 10 million of payments from the
insolvency administrator of BenQ, a former customer.
Other Operating Expense. Other operating
expense increased by 308 million from
57 million in the 2007 fiscal year to
365 million in the 2008 fiscal year, and decreased to
48 million in the 2009 fiscal year by
317 million compared to the 2008 fiscal year. Other
operating expense in the 2008 fiscal year related primarily to
higher restructuring and impairment charges in the 2008 fiscal
year compared to the 2007 fiscal year. To address rising risks
in the market environment, adverse currency trends and partially
below benchmark margins, we implemented the IFX10+
cost-reduction program in the third quarter of the
19
2008 fiscal year. The IFX10+ cost-reduction program targeted
certain areas to reduce costs including product portfolio
management, manufacturing costs reduction, value chain
optimization, processes efficiency, reorganization of our
structure along our target markets, and reductions in workforce.
Approximately 10 percent of our workforce worldwide was
impacted by IFX10+. In the 2008 fiscal year, we recorded
restructuring charges totaling 188 million, of which
172 million was attributable to the IFX10+
cost-reduction program. We recorded impairment charges of
130 million on property, plant and equipment and
intangible assets during the 2008 fiscal year, primarily
relating to the write-down of ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C,
Essonnes, France (ALTIS), to its estimated fair
value. In August 2007, we and IBM signed an agreement in
principle to divest our shares in ALTIS via a sale to Advanced
Electronic Systems AG (AES). As of
September 30, 2008, negotiations with AES had not
progressed as previously anticipated and could not be completed.
Despite the fact that negotiations were ongoing with additional
parties, the outcome of these negotiations was uncertain. As a
result, we reclassified related assets and liabilities
previously classified as held for sale into
held and used in the consolidated balance sheet as
of September 30, 2008, and recognized an impairment of
ALTIS to its estimated fair value, which contributed to the
increase in other operating expense in the 2008 fiscal year.
Additionally, we recorded a write-down of in-process R&D
acquired from LSI of 14 million as no future economic
benefit from its use or disposal was expected in the 2008 fiscal
year. In the 2009 fiscal year, impairment charges of only
3 million were recognized in other operating expense.
Furthermore, in the 2009 fiscal year as most significant
effects, we recognized a partial reversal of
25 million of provisions for expected termination
benefits attributable to the IFX10+ cost-reduction program and
5 million of additional restructuring charges in
other operating expense. Also included in other operating
expense is a loss before tax of 17 million from the
sale of the business of SensoNor. Other miscellaneous operating
expenses in the 2009 fiscal year remained unchanged compared to
the 2008 fiscal year.
Operating
Income (Loss)
In the 2007 fiscal year, our operating income was
101 million, compared to an operating loss of
46 million and 220 million in the 2008 and
2009 fiscal years, respectively.
Segment
Result
Segment Result for our separate reporting segments was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Result development for our reporting segments was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive In the 2008 fiscal year, Segment
Result was 105 million, a decline of 14 percent
compared to 122 million in the 2007 fiscal year,
primarily as a result of ongoing pricing pressure and higher
idle capacity costs. In the 2009 fiscal year, Segment Result was
negative 117 million compared to positive
105 million in the previous fiscal year. Despite
ongoing price pressure, the negative result was primarily caused
by the steep volume decline and higher cost for idle capacity,
particularly in the first half of the 2009 fiscal year. Cost
saving measures under our IFX10+ cost-reduction program partly
compensated for the negative impact from the economic downturn.
Higher sales volume and lower idle capacity cost in the second
half of the 2009 fiscal year compared to the first half of the
fiscal year, together with cost savings achieved under our
IFX10+ cost-reduction
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
program as well as short-time work and unpaid leave in all
areas, resulted in a partial recovery of Segment Result in the
second half of the 2009 fiscal year. For the fourth quarter of
the 2009 fiscal year, Segment Result of the Automotive segment
was positive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket In the
2008 fiscal year, Segment Result was 134 million, an
increase of 6 percent compared to 127 million in
the 2007 fiscal year, primarily reflecting the increase in gross
profit as a result of changes in the product mix, despite
ongoing pricing pressure. In the 2009 fiscal year, Segment
Result was 35 million, a decrease of 74 percent
compared to the 2008 fiscal year. This decline reflects
significantly lower revenues and higher idle capacity cost, and
therefore lower gross profit, which was partially offset by cost
reductions in R&D and in selling, general and
administrative expenses. These savings primarily resulted from
short-time work and from our IFX10+ cost-reduction program.
During the second half of the 2009 fiscal year, Segment Result
significantly improved compared to the first half of the fiscal
year but was still below the Segment Result for the second half
of the 2008 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Chip Card & Security In the 2008
fiscal year, Segment Result was 52 million, which was
an increase of 32 million from Segment Result of
20 million in the 2007 fiscal year. This increase
primarily reflected the increase in revenues and productivity as
well as effects from changes in product mix. Segment Result in
the 2009 fiscal year was negative 4 million, a
decrease of 56 million compared to the 2008 fiscal
year. This decrease was primarily caused by reduced gross profit
in line with the revenue decline and accompanied by increased
idle capacity costs, in particular in the first half of the 2009
fiscal year. Substantial savings under the IFX 10+ cost
reduction program, short time work and unpaid leave measures
only partially offset these effects. During the second half of
the 2009 fiscal year, Segment Result significantly improved
compared to the first half of the 2009 fiscal year and was
positive, as idle capacity cost decreased significantly in the
second half of the 2009 fiscal year due to increasing production
volumes. Segment Result for the second half of the 2009 fiscal
year was still below the Segment Result for the second half of
the 2008 fiscal year, however.
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions In the 2008 fiscal year,
Segment Result was negative 18 million, which was an
improvement of 86 percent from Segment Result of negative
126 million in the 2007 fiscal year. Despite the
negative impact of currency fluctuations between the
U.S. dollar and the Euro, this increase was primarily
driven by a strong increase in revenues and efficiency gains and
cost reduction measures initiated during the 2007 fiscal year
that were taking effect for a full fiscal year. In the 2009
fiscal year, Segment Result was negative 36 million,
compared to negative 18 million in the 2008 fiscal
year. This decrease was primarily due to the sales decline and
high idle capacity costs in the first half of the 2009 fiscal
year. These effects could be partially offset by the positive
development of Segment Result in the second half of the 2009
fiscal year, primarily resulting from increasing revenues and
lower idle capacity cost. Cost saving measures implemented under
the IFX10+ cost-reduction program and savings from short-time
work and unpaid leave also contributed to the increase in
Segment Result in the second half of the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Segments In the 2008 fiscal
year, Segment Result was negative 12 million, which
reflected a decline of 6 million compared with
Segment Result of negative 6 million in the 2007
fiscal year. This decline resulted primarily from a decrease in
revenues. In the 2009 fiscal year, Segment Result decreased
further by 1 million to negative
13 million. Included in the Segment Result of Other
Operating Segments for the 2007, 2008 and 2009 fiscal years are
overhead costs of 9 million, 10 million
and 7 million, respectively, which remain with us
after the sale of the Wireline Communications business and which
were previously allocated to the Wireline Communications
business.
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations In the 2008 fiscal
year, Segment Result was negative 24 million, which
reflected a decline of 31 million against Segment
Result of positive 7 million in the 2007 fiscal year.
This decline resulted primarily from increased unabsorbed excess
capacity cost. In the 2009 fiscal year, Segment Result further
decreased by 8 million to negative
32 million, primarily
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
due to a further increase in unabsorbed idle capacity cost of
20 million to 41 million, compared with
21 million in the 2008 fiscal year. This increase in
unabsorbed idle capacity cost was partly offset by a reduction
of provisions for staff anniversary bonus payments as we
terminated the anniversary bonus payment scheme in the 2009
fiscal year.
|
The following table provides the reconciliation of Segment
Result to our operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Total Segment Result
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
Adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges and other related closure costs, net
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Acquisition-related amortization and losses
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on sales of assets, businesses, or interests in
subsidiaries
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Financial Income
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
3
|
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
|
%
|
Financial Expense
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
%
|
Financial Income. In the 2008 fiscal year,
financial income decreased by 49 million compared to
the 2007 fiscal year, primarily as a result of the negative
impact of the worldwide financial crisis in the 2008 fiscal
year. This resulted in lower income derived from the valuation
of available-for-sale financial assets and gains realized on the
sale of available-for-sale financial assets. This lower income
was only partly offset by higher interest income in the 2008
fiscal year compared to the 2007 fiscal year, which we derive
primarily from cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale
financial assets. In the 2009 fiscal year, financial income
increased by 43 million to 101 million.
This increase primarily resulted from the 61 million
gain realized from the repurchase of our exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 and our convertible subordinated
notes due 2010, which was partially offset by lower other
interest income we realized during the 2009 fiscal year compared
to the 2008 fiscal year. In addition, gains from the valuation
of interest rate swaps contributed to the increase of financial
income during the 2009 fiscal year.
Financial Expense. In the 2007 fiscal year,
financial expense was 242 million compared to
181 million in the 2008 fiscal year and
156 million in the 2009 fiscal year. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, we entered into agreements
with Molstanda Vermietungsgesellschaft mbH
(Molstanda) and a financial institution. Molstanda
is the owner of a parcel of land located in the vicinity of our
headquarters south of Munich. Pursuant to SIC 12
Consolidation Special Purpose
Entities, we determined that Molstanda meets the
criteria of a Special Purpose Entity (SPE) and, as a
result of the agreements, we control it. Accordingly, we
consolidated Molstandas assets with a fair value of
41 million and liabilities with a fair value of
76 million beginning in the second quarter of the
2007 fiscal year. The 35 million excess in fair value
of liabilities over the fair value of identifiable assets was
recorded as other financial expense during the second quarter of
the 2007 fiscal year. Due to our loss situation, no tax benefit
was provided on this loss. We subsequently acquired the majority
of the outstanding capital of
22
Molstanda during the fourth quarter of the 2007 fiscal year.
Furthermore, we incurred lower valuation charges and losses on
sales of available-for-sale financial assets in the 2008 fiscal
year compared to the 2007 fiscal year. This decrease was
partially offset by the 8 million loss we incurred in
connection with the repurchase during the 2008 fiscal year of
notional amounts of 100 million of our convertible
subordinated notes due 2010. In the 2009 fiscal year, financial
expense further decreased by 25 million compared to
the 2008 fiscal year to 156 million. This was due
primarily to reduced interest expense of 24 million
in the 2009 fiscal year compared to the 2008 fiscal year, which
resulted from lower interest rates and lower indebtedness as
well as lower losses incurred in connection with repurchases of
our exchangeable subordinated notes due 2010 and our convertible
subordinated notes due 2010.
Income from
Investments Accounted for Using the Equity Method
In the 2007, 2008 and 2009 fiscal years, income from investments
accounted for using the equity method was 1 million,
4 million and 7 million, respectively, and
primarily reflected our share in the net income of Bipolar.
Income Tax
Benefit (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Percentage of revenue
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
6
|
|
%
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
%
|
Generally, deferred tax assets in tax jurisdictions that have a
three-year cumulative loss are subject to a valuation allowance
excluding the impact of forecasted future taxable income. In the
2007, 2008 and 2009 fiscal years we continued to have a
three-year cumulative loss in certain tax jurisdictions and,
accordingly, we recorded increases in the valuation allowance of
25 million, 183 million and
88 million in those periods, respectively. We assess
our deferred tax asset position on a regular basis. Our ability
to realize benefits from our deferred tax assets is dependent on
our ability to generate future taxable income sufficient to
utilize tax loss carry-forwards or tax credits before
expiration. We expect to continue to recognize no tax benefits
in these jurisdictions until we have ceased to be in a
cumulative loss position for the preceding three-year period.
23
Loss from
Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
The results of Qimonda and the Wireline Communications business,
which are presented in the consolidated statements of operations
as discontinued operations for the 2007, 2008 and 2009 fiscal
years, consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Qimonda(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(3,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
Reversal (write-down) of measurement to fair value less costs to
sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
Expenses resulting from Qimondas application to open
insolvency proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
Losses resulting from the realization from accumulated losses
related to unrecognized currency translation effects primarily
upon deconsolidation and from Qimondas sale of Inotera
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimondas share of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before tax
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications share of discontinued operations,
net of tax
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
No further information concerning Qimondas condensed
consolidated statements of operations is available for the
period from January 1, 2009, to January 23, 2009, the
date of the application by Qimonda to commence insolvency
proceedings. As disclosed below, due to the write-down of
Qimondas net assets to zero as of September 30, 2008,
the operating losses of Qimonda for the period from
October 1, 2008 to January 23, 2009 did not affect our
consolidated net income, but instead were eliminated via an
offsetting partial reversal of previously recorded impairments.
Therefore, while the amount of revenue and costs and expenses in
the table above exclude amounts for the period from
January 1, 2009 to January 23, 2009, Qimondas
share of loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
of 420 million is unaffected.
|
Qimonda
In the 2008 fiscal year Qimondas total revenues decreased
by 1,823 million, or 51 percent, to
1,785 million from 3,608 million in the
2007 fiscal year. This decrease resulted primarily from a
significant decrease in DRAM prices and to a lesser extent the
average exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against the Euro.
These decreases were partly offset by increases of higher bit
shipments.
Cost and expenses of Qimonda decreased by 183 million
from 3,956 million in the 2007 fiscal year to
3,773 million in the 2008 fiscal year, primarily as a
result of a decrease in cost of goods sold. This decrease was
partly offset by restructuring charges, impairment charges and
higher R&D expenses primarily related to Qimondas
efforts in the new Buried Wordline technology for 65-nanometers
and
46-nanometers.
Restructuring expenses of Qimonda during the 2008 fiscal year
related primarily to the relocation of the back-end production
in Malaysia, the combination of the research centers in
24
North America, a comprehensive cost reduction program, the
shutdown of Qimondas Flash activities in Italy and a
global repositioning program. During the 2008 fiscal year,
Qimonda recognized impairment charges for goodwill and for
long-lived assets of the Richmond 200-millimeter facility.
Additionally, as a result of Qimondas agreement to sell
its 35.6 percent interest in Inotera Memories Inc.
(Inotera) to Micron Technology, Inc.
(Micron) for U.S. dollar 400 million,
Qimonda recognized impairment charges to reduce the carrying
value of its investment in Inotera to the sales price less costs
to sell. Furthermore, we recognized a write-down of
1,475 million to reduce Qimonda to its estimated fair
value less cost to sell.
On January 23, 2009, Qimonda and its wholly owned
subsidiary Qimonda Dresden filed an application at the Munich
Local Court to commence insolvency proceedings. As a result of
this application, we deconsolidated Qimonda in accordance with
IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements during the second quarter of the 2009 fiscal
year. On April 1, 2009, the insolvency proceedings formally
opened. Formal insolvency proceedings have also been commenced
by several additional subsidiaries of Qimonda in various
jurisdictions. The final resolution of the insolvency
proceedings, including the final disposition of the remaining
assets and liabilities of Qimonda, cannot be predicted at this
time.
The results presented for Qimonda from October 1, 2008
through January 23, 2009 (the date of deconsolidation) are
based on preliminary results provided by Qimonda prior to its
insolvency filing, and were prepared on a going concern basis.
Financial statements on a liquidation basis, which would be
required when the going concern assumption is not assured, are
not available from Qimonda. There can be no assurance that
recorded book values of individual assets and liabilities held
for disposal by us would not be materially different if
presented on a liquidation basis; however, as the net assets of
Qimonda held for disposal by us through deconsolidation are
already valued at the fair value less costs to sell of zero as
of September 30, 2008, the net value presented in the
consolidated financial statements would not be impacted.
The operating losses of Qimonda from October 1, 2008
through the date of deconsolidation, exclusive of depreciation,
amortization and impairment of long-lived assets, were offset by
a partial reversal of 460 million of the write-downs
recorded in the 2008 fiscal year to reduce the net assets of
Qimonda to fair value less costs to sell of zero.
During the fiscal year 2009, Qimonda-related amounts included in
loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes consisted
principally of:
|
|
|
|
|
the realization of accumulated foreign currency translation
losses of 88 million which were directly recorded in
equity, and not included in assets and liabilities held for
disposal as of September 30, 2008, mainly from
Qimondas sale of its interest in Inotera to Micron,
|
|
|
|
the realization of accumulated foreign currency translation
losses which were directly recorded in equity related to the
deconsolidation of Qimonda totaling
100 million, and
|
|
|
|
charges for provisions and allowances of 227 million
in connection with Qimondas insolvency (see below).
|
As a result of the commencement of insolvency proceedings by
Qimonda, we are exposed to further potential liabilities arising
in connection with the Qimonda business, which include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We are a named defendant in certain pending antitrust and
securities law claims. Qimonda is required to indemnify us, in
whole or in part, for such claims, including any related
expenses. As a result of Qimondas insolvency, however, we
expect that Qimonda will not be able to indemnify us for these
claims. For more information on these pending antitrust and
securities law claims and their potential impact on us, see
note 38 to our consolidated financial statements
(Commitments and Contingencies Litigation
and Government Inquiries Antitrust Litigation,
Other Government Inquiries, and
Securities Litigation).
|
|
|
|
We are the named defendant in a lawsuit in Delaware in which the
plaintiffs are seeking to hold us liable for the payment of
severance and other benefits allegedly due by Qimondas
North American
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries in connection with the termination of employment
related to Qimondas insolvency. For more information on
this suit, see note 38 to our consolidated financial
statements (Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation and Government Inquiries Employment
Litigation).
|
|
|
|
|
|
We face potential liabilities arising from our former interest
in Qimonda Dresden. Before the carve-out of the Qimonda
business, we were a general partner of Qimonda Dresden, and as
such may in certain circumstances, as a matter of law, be held
liable for certain liabilities of Qimonda Dresden that
originated prior to the carve-out. These include, among others,
the potential repayment of governmental subsidies as well as
employee-related claims, including salaries and social security
contributions. We are in negotiations with the Free State of
Saxony and the Qimonda insolvency administrator regarding these
matters. We recorded provisions in connection with these
matters, but disclosure of the amount of the provision could
seriously prejudice our negotiations regarding these matters.
|
|
|
|
We and our subsidiary Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH
(Infineon Dresden) are subject to lawsuits by
approximately 70 former employees who were transferred to
Qimonda or Qimonda Dresden as part of the carve-out and who seek
to be re-employed by us. No reasonable estimated amount can be
attributed at this time to the potential outcome of any such
claims.
|
In addition to the matters described above, we may be subject to
claims by the insolvency administrator under German insolvency
laws for repayment of certain amounts received by us from
Qimonda, such as payments for intra-group services and supplies
during defined periods prior to the commencement of insolvency
proceedings. Depending on future developments in Qimondas
operations in Portugal, there is a possibility that claims could
be made against us in connection with governmental subsidies
received by Qimonda Portugal, S.A. prior to the carve-out. No
such claims have been made to date, and no reasonable estimated
amount can be attributed at this time to the size or potential
outcome of any such claims. The insolvency of Qimonda may also
subject us to other claims arising in connection with the
contracts, offers, uncompleted transactions, continuing
obligations, risks, encumbrances and other liabilities
contributed to Qimonda in connection with the carve-out of the
Qimonda business, as we expect that Qimonda will not be able to
fulfill its obligation to indemnify us against any such
liabilities. Moreover, we may lose rights and licenses to
Qimondas intellectual property rights to which we are
entitled under the contribution agreement in connection with the
carve-out of the Qimonda business, due to fact that the
administrator has declared non-performance of this agreement. We
are evaluating the scope of any potentially affected
intellectual property, and are unable to provide reasonable
estimates at this time of any potential costs in this regard.
As of September 30, 2009, we recorded aggregate liabilities
of 21 million and provisions
of 163 million in connection with these matters.
The recorded provisions are primarily reflected within
Current provisions, and the remainder are recorded
within Long-term provisions. The recorded provisions
reflect the amount of those liabilities that management believes
are probable and can be estimated with reasonable accuracy at
that time. There can be no assurance that such provisions
recorded will be sufficient to cover all liabilities that may
ultimately be incurred in relation to these matters. Disclosure
of individual amounts with respect to these matters could
seriously prejudice our legal or negotiating position, and
therefore have been omitted. No reasonable estimate can be made
at this time related to those potential liabilities that may be
incurred, but that are currently not viewed to be probable.
Wireline
Communications Business
In the 2008 fiscal year, revenues of the Wireline Communications
business were 418 million, a slight increase
compared to 414 million in the 2007 fiscal year,
primarily due to growth in broadband solutions, mainly driven by
the consolidation of the Customer Premises Equipment
(CPE) business acquired from Texas Instruments, Inc.
The increase was partially offset by declining legacy revenues
and negative currency effects. In the 2009 fiscal year, revenues
decreased by 20 percent to 333 million.
This decrease was primarily driven by the economic slowdown that
affected both the CPE and the infrastructure businesses.
26
In the 2008 fiscal year, profit before tax of the Wireline
Communications business was 18 million, an
increase of 28 million compared to a loss before
tax of 10 million in the 2007 fiscal year. This
increase primarily resulted from efficiency gains and cost
reduction measures initiated during the 2007 fiscal year.
In 2009 fiscal year, profit before tax of the Wireline
Communications business was 24 million, an
increase of 6 million compared to the 2008
fiscal year despite a 20 percent revenue decline compared
to the 2008 fiscal year. This positive development was a result
of the measures implemented under the IFX10+ cost-reduction
program as well as cost reductions realized from short-time work
and unpaid leave.
Net
Loss
In the 2007 fiscal year, net loss was significantly impacted by
the results from discontinued operations, net of income tax,
primarily due to Qimondas net loss, which resulted from
the deterioration in memory product prices and a weaker
U.S. dollar, and consequently a significant decrease in
Qimondas gross margin. Net loss from discontinued
operations in the 2007 fiscal year also included
an 84 million loss from the sale of
28.75 million Qimonda ADSs. Restructuring charges
of 45 million and the expenses
of 35 million resulting from the consolidation
of Molstanda also contributed to the net loss in the 2007 fiscal
year.
In the 2008 fiscal year, the increase in net loss
to 3,747 million was primarily due to the
increase in losses from discontinued operations, resulting from
Qimondas net loss and the write-downs
of 1,475 million to reduce Qimonda to its
estimated current fair value less costs to sell. Furthermore,
restructuring charges of 188 million primarily
related to the IFX10+ program, and impairment charges
of 130 million on property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets, contributed to the net loss in the 2008
fiscal year.
In the 2009 fiscal year, our net loss significantly decreased,
to 671 million. Our operating segments were
deeply impacted by the economic slowdown, in particular during
the first half of the 2009 fiscal year. Additionally, the
results of discontinued operations, net of income taxes,
significantly impacted our net loss in the first half of the
2009 fiscal year, which primarily resulted from the
deconsolidation of Qimonda and the charges for provisions and
allowances in connection with Qimondas insolvency. We
experienced a significant reduction in our net loss in the
second half of the 2009 fiscal year and reached break even for
the fourth quarter of the 2009 fiscal year. This improvement
resulted from the partial recovery of the economy during the
second half of the 2009 fiscal year, together with the positive
impact of our cost saving measures and significantly lower
charges in connection with Qimondas insolvency in the
second half of the 2009 fiscal year compared to the first half
of the 2009 fiscal year.
27
Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
year-on-year
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
(in %)
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
4,648
|
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
%
|
thereof: assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
%
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
2,334
|
|
|
|
|
1,862
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,982
|
|
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
%
|
thereof: liabilities associated with assets classified as held
for disposal
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
%
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
%
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, our total assets decreased by
34 percent to 4,606 million
from 6,982 million as of September 30,
2008. This decrease was primarily due to the deconsolidation of
Qimonda, which led to a reduction in total assets
of 2,129 million that were presented as assets
classified as held for disposal in the prior year. In connection
with the sale of the Wireline Communications business, assets
and liabilities to be transferred to Lantiq were presented as
assets and liabilities classified as held for disposal in the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009, thus
decreasing non-current assets by 67 million and
non-current liabilities by 1 million and
increasing current assets and liabilities, accordingly.
Within current assets, cash and cash equivalents increased
significantly, by 665 million
from 749 million as of September 30, 2008
to 1,414 million as of September 30, 2009,
primarily as a result of our share capital increase and the
issuance of new convertible subordinated notes due 2014, which
were partly offset by repurchases and redemptions of convertible
subordinated notes and exchangeable subordinated notes due 2010.
The receipt of 120 million from the German
banks deposit protection fund throughout the 2009 fiscal
year also contributed positively to cash and cash equivalents.
This increase in current assets was partly offset by a reduction
of trade and other receivables by 285 million
to 514 million and of inventory
by 205 million to 460 million as
of September 30, 2009, primarily due to lower revenues
followed by improved working capital management. The change in
inventory also relates to a reclassification
of 43 million to assets held for disposal in
connection with the sale of the Wireline Communications
business. Furthermore, the receipt
of 120 million from the German banks
deposit protection fund in the 2009 fiscal year and allowances
for doubtful accounts recorded on receivables against Qimonda
following Qimondas insolvency proceedings contributed to
the decrease in trade and other receivables.
Within non-current assets, property, plant and equipment
decreased by 382 million
from 1,310 million
to 928 million, primarily as capital
expenditures were more than offset by depreciation and
amortization during the 2009 fiscal year. Furthermore, the sale
of the SensoNor business contributed to the decrease in
property, plant and equipment and 9 million were
reclassified as assets held for disposal, mainly in connection
with the sale of the Wireline Communications business. Out of
goodwill and other intangible assets, 58 million
in connection with our Wireline Communications business were
classified as assets held for disposal, which also includes the
goodwill relating to the acquisition of the CPE business from
Texas Instruments Inc. (see note 4 of our consolidated
financial statements).
Total liabilities decreased by 2,548 million, or
53 percent, from 4,821 million as of
September 30, 2008, to 2,273 million as of
September 30, 2009. This decrease was primarily caused by
the
28
deconsolidation of Qimonda, which led to a reduction in total
liabilities of 2,123 million, which were
classified as liabilities associated with assets held for
disposal as of September 30, 2008.
Furthermore, in June 2009, we
reclassified 487 million of our convertible
subordinated notes due 2010 with notional amounts
of 522 million from long-term debt into
short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt, as
they mature in June 2010. Subsequently, we repurchased notional
amounts of 74 million of our convertible
subordinated notes due 2010. As of September 30, 2009,
notional amounts of our convertible subordinated notes due 2010
of 448 million and a book value
of 425 million were included in our short term
debt. Other changes in current liabilities related to a decrease
in trade and other payables as of September 30, 2009,
by 113 million compared to September 30,
2008, primarily resulting from lower trade accounts payables due
to lower purchased services and lower capital expenditures.
Also, other current liabilities decreased
by 116 million, resulting from the decrease of
employee-related liabilities, primarily due to payments of
termination benefits in connection with our IFX 10+
cost-reduction program, which were recorded in the 2008
financial statements, and the reduction of liabilities for bonus
payments.
Non-current liabilities decreased as of September 30, 2009,
by 533 million compared to September 30,
2008. This was primarily due to the reclassification of
convertible subordinated notes due 2010 from long-term debt into
short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt and due
to repurchases and redemptions of notional amounts of our
exchangeable subordinated notes due 2010
of 215 million and of our convertible
subordinated notes due 2010 of 152 million
including the repurchase of 74 million as described
above. This decrease was partly offset by the issuance of new
convertible subordinated notes due 2014 with a notional amount
of 196 million, resulting in an increase of
long-term debt by 145 million as
September 30, 2009, net of debt issuance cost, discount and
the conversion component recognized in equity. Long-term
provisions increased by 62 million, primarily
for potential liabilities resulting from Qimondas
insolvency.
Total equity increased by 172 million as of
September 30, 2009, as a result of our share capital
increase of 680 million, which was partly offset
by the net loss incurred in the 2009 fiscal year.
Financial
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Non-current
asset
intensity(1)
|
|
|
51
|
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
|
%
|
Current asset
intensity(2)
|
|
|
49
|
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
|
%
|
Degree of
wear of fixed
assets(3)
|
|
|
72
|
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
|
%
|
Depreciation
rate of fixed
assets(4)
|
|
|
10
|
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
|
%
|
Inventory
intensity(5)
|
|
|
11
|
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
%
|
Inventory
turnover(6)
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Inventory
reach in
days(7)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Days sales
outstanding(8)
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
Equity
ratio(9)
|
|
|
57
|
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
|
%
|
Return on
equity(10)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
%
|
Return on
assets(11)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
%
|
Equity-to-fixed-assets
ratio(12)
|
|
|
165
|
|
%
|
|
|
165
|
|
%
|
|
|
251
|
|
%
|
Debt-to-equity
ratio(13)
|
|
|
26
|
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
|
%
|
The aforementioned financial condition ratios are calculated as
follows:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-current asset intensity =
non-current assets/total assets
|
|
(2) |
|
Current asset intensity = current
assets/total assets
|
|
(3) |
|
Degree of wear of property, plant
and equipment = accumulated depreciation on property, plant and
equipment /historical costs of property, plant and equipment at
the end of the fiscal year
|
|
(4) |
|
Depreciation rate of property,
plant and equipment = annual depreciation of property, plant and
equipment /historical costs of property, plant and equipment at
the end of the fiscal year
|
29
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Inventory intensity =
inventory/total assets
|
|
(6) |
|
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods
sold/average inventory
|
|
(7) |
|
Inventory reach in days = average
inventory x 360 days/annual revenues
|
|
(8) |
|
Days sales outstanding = average
trade and other receivables x 360 days/annual revenues
|
|
(9) |
|
Equity ratio = equity/total assets
|
|
(10) |
|
Return on equity = net income
(loss) for the year/average equity
|
|
(11) |
|
Return on assets = net income
(loss) for the year/average total assets
|
|
(12) |
|
Equity-to-fixed-assets ratio =
equity/property, plant and equipment
|
|
(13) |
|
Debt-to-equity ratio = (short-term
debt + long-term debt)/equity
|
|
|
|
The average of a balance sheet
position is calculated as the arithmetic average of the amount
as of the balance sheet dates of the current and the prior years.
|
In the 2008 fiscal year, the net loss incurred was primarily the
result of Qimondas operating losses and the recorded
write-down in order to remeasure Qimonda to its current fair
value less cost to sell. Accordingly, our equity and total
assets decreased significantly compared to 2007. This resulted
in significant decreases in non-current asset intensity, equity
ratio, return on equity, and return on assets, while current
asset intensity and debt to equity ratios increased. In the 2009
fiscal year, we deconsolidated Qimonda, which led to a further
reduction in total assets, and thus led to an increase in
non-current asset intensity and equity ratio.
In the 2008 fiscal year, lower net capital expenditures in
property, plant and equipment resulted in an increase in our
degree of wear of fixed assets and a decrease in our
depreciation rate of fixed assets. This development continued in
the 2009 fiscal year as a result of the ongoing decrease of our
investing activities year-over-year.
While the debt-to-equity ratio significantly increased in the
2008 fiscal year compared to the 2007 fiscal year due to the
equity decrease as a result of the Qimonda losses, in the 2009
fiscal year the debt-to-equity, equity and return on equity
ratios improved considerably and decreased as a result of the
share capital increase and repurchases and redemptions of
exchangeable subordinated notes and convertible subordinated
notes due 2010. This was partially offset by the issuance of new
convertible subordinated notes due 2014.
The development of the ratios inventory turnover, inventory
reach in days, and days sales outstanding was strongly impacted
by the change in business environment, which occurred primarily
in the first and second quarters of the 2009 fiscal year,
followed by strict working capital management. This resulted in
significantly lower accounts receivable and strong decreases in
inventory throughout the 2009 fiscal year.
30
Liquidity
Cash
Flow
Our consolidated statements of cash flows show the sources and
uses of cash and cash equivalents during the reported periods.
They are of key importance for the evaluation of our financial
position.
Cash flows from investing and financing activities are both
directly determined based on payments and receipts. Cash flows
from operating activities are determined indirectly from net
loss. The changes in balance sheet items have been adjusted for
the effects of foreign currency exchange fluctuations and for
changes in the scope of consolidation. Therefore, they do not
conform to the corresponding changes in the respective balance
sheet line items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from
operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations was 268 million in the 2009 fiscal year,
and reflected primarily the loss from continuing operations of
273 million, excluding non-cash charges for
depreciation and amortization of 513 million, and
17 million resulting from the sale of the SensoNor
business. Net cash provided by operating activities from
continuing operations included 19 million received
from the German banks deposit protection fund as well as
10 million received from the BenQ insolvency
administrator, and was also positively impacted by income tax
refunds received of 16 million and interest received
of 21 million. Interest paid of 49 million
reduced net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash flow from
investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
of 14 million in the 2009 fiscal year mainly reflects
capital expenditures of 51 million for the
capitalization of internally developed intangible assets and the
purchase of intangible assets and of 103 million for
the purchase of property, plant and equipment. This was offset
by 101 million principal amount received from the
German banks deposit protection fund in the second and
third quarters of the 2009 fiscal year for cash deposits.
Furthermore, net proceeds (sales less purchases) of
33 million from available-for-sale financial assets
and the consideration of 4 million received from the
sale of the SensoNor business contributed positively to cash
used in investing activities from continuing operations.
Cash flow from
financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing
operations was 391 million for the year ended
September 30, 2009, compared to net cash used in financing
activities from continuing operations
of 230 million for the year ended
September 30, 2008. In the 2009 fiscal year, we increased
our ordinary share capital by 674 million, with
the net excess issuance proceeds reflected in additional
paid-in-capital.
This increased our net cash provided by financing activities
from continuing operations by 680 million.
Further increases resulted from proceeds
of 182 million, net of debt issuance cost and
discount, from the issuance of convertible subordinated notes
due 2014 with a notional amount of 196 million.
This was partly offset by principal repayments of long-term debt
of 455 million, of which the majority related to
the
31
repurchase and redemption of our exchangeable subordinated notes
due 2010 and our convertible subordinated notes due 2010 for an
aggregate of 285 million in cash including
transaction costs of 3 million. Additional debt
repayments related primarily to the repayment of our syndicated
loan.
Change in cash
and cash equivalents from discontinued operations
The net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued
operations was 393 million in the 2009 fiscal
year, compared to 291 million in the prior year.
The net decrease in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued
operations primarily reflected Qimondas net cash used in
operating activities of 416 million as well as
cash used in financing activities of 40 million,
which was partly offset by Qimondas net cash provided by
investing activities of 21 million.
Qimondas cash used in operating activities primarily
reflected Qimondas net loss in the first quarter, before
Qimonda was deconsolidated. The net cash provided by investing
activities of 21 million consisted primarily of cash
received by Qimonda in connection with the sale of Inotera to
Micron in November 2008 for 400 million U.S. dollars
(approximately 296 million), partially offset,
due to the deconsolidation of Qimonda, by the cash and cash
equivalents totaling 286 million of Qimonda as
of January 23, 2009, the date Qimonda filed an application
to commence insolvency proceedings.
In the 2009 fiscal year our Wireline Communications business
contributed 36 million to the operating cash
flow from discontinued operations, primarily reflecting net
income excluding depreciation and amortization, and
contributed 6 million to net cash provided by
investing activities from discontinued operations,
reflecting 13 million received as a refund of
contingent consideration from Texas Instruments Inc. due to the
failure to achieve agreed revenue targets of the CPE business
and 7 million paid for investments in intangible
assets and property, plant and equipment.
Free Cash
Flow
We define free cash flow as cash flow from operating and
investing activities from continuing operations excluding
purchases or sales of available-for-sale financial assets. Since
we hold a portion of our available monetary resources in the
form of readily available-for-sale financial assets, and operate
in a capital intensive industry, we report free cash flow to
provide investors with a measure that can be used to evaluate
changes in liquidity after taking capital expenditures into
account. Free cash flow is not intended to represent the
residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures,
since debt service requirements or other non-discretionary
expenditures are not deducted. Free cash flow includes only
amounts from continuing operations, and is determined as follows
from the consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
Sales of securities available-for-sale, net
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow was positive 221 million in the
2009 fiscal year, compared to
negative 139 million in the 2008 fiscal year, a
significant improvement of 360 million. Free
cash flow in the 2008 fiscal year, compared to the 2009 fiscal
year, included higher cash used in investing activities from
continuing operations, due to the acquisitions of the mobility
products business of LSI and Primarion Inc.
for 353 million, and higher capital expenditures
of 308 million for property, plant and
equipment, which were only partly offset by higher cash provided
by operating activities from continuing operations. Free cash
flow in the 2009 fiscal year included cash inflow
of 120 million from the German banks
deposit protection fund and cash outflows for our IFX10+
cost-reduction program.
32
Net
Cash/(Debt) Position
The following table presents our gross and net cash/(debt)
positions and the maturity of debt. It is not intended to be a
forecast of cash available in future periods. Since we hold a
portion of our available monetary resources in the form of
readily available-for-sale financial assets, which for IFRS
purposes are not considered to be cash, we report
our gross and net cash/(debt) positions to provide investors
with an understanding of our overall liquidity. The gross and
net cash/(debt) position is determined as follows from the
consolidated balance sheets, without adjustment to the IFRS
amounts presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-2
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
3-4
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash position
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial debt
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash/(debt) position
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our gross cash position, representing cash and cash equivalents
plus available-for-sale financial assets,
was 1,507 million at September 30, 2009,
compared to 883 million at the prior year end.
The increase resulted from our share capital increase
of 680 million, positive free cash flow
of 221 million, and the issuance of new
convertible subordinated notes due 2014. The increase was partly
offset by the repurchase and redemption of exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 and convertible subordinated notes
due 2010.
Our net cash/(debt) position as of September 30, 2009,
defined as gross cash position less short and long-term debt,
was 657 million, an improvement
of 944 million from
negative 287 million as of September 30,
2008, primarily reflecting the increase in gross cash position
described above and a reduction in total financial debt
of 320 million. The reduction in debt relates to
repurchases and redemptions of exchangeable subordinated notes
due 2010 and convertible subordinated notes due 2010, net of
accretion, as well as repayments of other debt, partly offset by
the issuance of new convertible subordinated notes due 2014.
Long-term debt and short-term debt principally consist of
convertible subordinated notes that were issued in order to
strengthen our liquidity position and allow us more financial
flexibility in conducting our business operations. The total
notional amount of outstanding convertible notes as of
September 30, 2009, amounted
to 644 million, of
which 196 million are long-term for subordinated
convertible notes due 2014 and 448 million are
short-term for convertible subordinated notes due 2010.
On June 5, 2003, we issued at
par 700 million in convertible subordinated
notes due 2010. The notes are unsecured and accrue interest at
5 percent per year. The notes were originally convertible,
at the option of the noteholders, into a maximum of
68.4 million ordinary shares of our company, at a
conversion price of 10.23 per share through maturity. As a
result of our share capital increase in August 2009 the
conversion price has been adjusted to 9.14 in
accordance with an antidilution provision contained in the
notes. During the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years, we repurchased
notional amounts of 100 million
and 152 million, respectively, of convertible
subordinated notes due 2010. The repurchases were made out of
available cash. These notes were subsequently cancelled.
33
On September 26, 2007, we
issued 215 million in exchangeable subordinated
notes due 2010 at par. The notes were unsecured and accrued
interest at 1.375 percent per year. In the 2009 fiscal year
we repurchased and redeemed all of our notional amounts
of 215 million of our exchangeable subordinated
notes due 2010. The repurchases and redemptions were made out of
available cash.
On May 26, 2009, we issued 196 million in
new subordinated convertible notes due 2014 at a discount of
7.2 percent. The notes were originally convertible, at the
option of the holders of the notes, into a maximum of
74.9 million of our ordinary shares at a conversion price
of 2.61 per share through maturity. As a result of
our share capital increase in August 2009, the conversion price
has been adjusted to 2.33 in accordance with an
antidilution provision contained in the notes. The notes accrue
interest at 7.5 percent per year. The notes are unsecured
and rank pari passu with all present and future unsecured
subordinated obligations of the issuer.
To secure our cash position and to keep flexibility with regards
to liquidity, we have implemented a policy with risk limits for
the amounts deposited with respect to the counterparty, credit
rating, sector, duration, credit support and type of instrument.
Capital
Requirements
We require capital in our 2010 fiscal year to:
|
|
|
|
|
finance our operations;
|
|
|
|
make scheduled debt payments;
|
|
|
|
settle contingencies if they occur; and
|
|
|
|
make planned capital expenditures.
|
We expect to meet these requirements through:
|
|
|
|
|
cash flows generated from operations;
|
|
|
|
cash on hand and securities we can sell; and
|
|
|
|
available credit facilities.
|
As of September 30, 2009, we require funds for the 2010
fiscal year aggregating 1,073 million,
consisting of 521 million for short-term debt
payments and 552 million for commitments. In
addition, we may need up to 18 million for
currently known and estimable contingencies. We also plan to
invest approximately 220 million
to 250 million in capital expenditures. As of
September 30, 2009, we had a gross cash position
of 1,507 million, and the ability to draw funds
from available credit facilities of 211 million.
34
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due/Expirations by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
1-2
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
3-4
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
5
|
|
As of September 30,
2009(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Contractual obligations and commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and short-term debt obligations
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
Unconditional purchase commitments
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future interest payments
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other contingencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(2)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Contingent
government
grants(3)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contingencies
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain payments of obligations or
expiration of commitments that are based on the achievement of
milestones or other events that are not date-certain are
included for purposes of this table, based on our estimate of
the reasonably likely timing of payments or expirations in each
particular case. Actual outcomes could differ from those
estimates.
|
|
(2) |
|
Guarantees are primarily issued for
the payment of import duties, rentals of buildings and
contingent obligations related to government grants received.
|
|
(3) |
|
Contingent government grants refer
to amounts previously received, related to the construction and
financing of certain production facilities, which are not
guaranteed otherwise and could be refundable if the total
project requirements are not met. They do not include any
potentially contingent government grants in relation to Qimonda.
|
The above table should be read together with note 38 to our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2009.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We issue guarantees in the normal course of business, primarily
for the payment of import duties, rentals of buildings and
contingent obligations related to government grants received. As
of September 30, 2009, the undiscounted amount of potential
future payments for guarantees was 81 million.
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
Intangible assets internally developed
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Intangible assets purchased
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In our 2009 fiscal year budget prepared in the prior year, we
expected to invest approximately 200 million,
primarily for our manufacturing facilities in Malacca, Malaysia,
and in Kulim, Malaysia. As a result of the economic downturn, we
reconsidered our investment decisions and considerably reduced
actual investments in property, plant and equipment
to 103 million in the 2009 fiscal year. As
research and development activities are important for our
business, we only reduced research and development activities to
a limited extent as a result of the economic situation. The
level of capitalized development
35
cost remained substantially unchanged, and approximately the
same absolute amount of development cost qualified for
capitalization under IFRS compared to our 2008 fiscal year.
Depending on market developments and our business situation, we
currently expect to invest
approximately 220 million
to 250 million in capital expenditures in the
2010 fiscal year. We also continuously seek to improve
productivity and upgrade technology at existing facilities. As
of September 30, 2009, 35 million of this
amount was committed and included in unconditional purchase
commitments. Due to the lead times between ordering and delivery
of equipment, a substantial amount of capital expenditures
typically is committed well in advance.
Credit
Facilities
We have established both short- and long-term credit facilities
with a number of different financial institutions in order to
meet our anticipated funding requirements. These facilities
aggregate 491 million, of
which 211 million remained available at
September 30, 2009, and comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of financial
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
institution
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
commitment
|
|
Purpose/intended use
|
|
facility
|
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
general corporate purposes, working capital, guarantees
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
no firm commitment
|
|
working capital, cash management
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
Long-term(1)
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
project finance
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Including current maturities.
|
In September 2004, we executed a $400/400 million
syndicated credit facility with a five-year term, which was
subsequently reduced to $345/300 million in August
2006. In January 2006, we drew $345 million under
Tranche A, on the basis of a repayment schedule that
consisted of equal installments falling due in March and
September each year. On September 23, 2009, Tranche A
was fully repaid at its final maturity. Tranche B, which
was a multicurrency revolving facility to be used for general
corporate purposes, expired undrawn at its final maturity on
September 23, 2009.
In June 2009, local financial institutions granted working
capital and project loan facilities to our subsidiary, Infineon
Technologies (Wuxi) Co. Ltd., amounting to a total of
$141 million (97 million). These multi-year
facilities are available for general corporate purposes and the
expansion of manufacturing facilities in Wuxi, China, including
intragroup asset transfers. As of September 30, 2009, there
were no drawings outstanding under these facilities. Any amounts
drawn under these facilities will be partially secured by an
asset pledge and a corporate guarantee.
Furthermore, we have established various independent financing
arrangements with several financial institutions, in the form of
both short- and long-term credit facilities, which are available
for various funding purposes.
We plan to fund our working capital and capital requirements
from cash provided by operations, available funds, bank loans,
government subsidies and, if needed, the issuance of additional
debt or equity securities. We have also applied for governmental
subsidies in connection with certain capital expenditure
projects, but can provide no assurance that such subsidies will
be granted on a timely basis or at all.
Taking into consideration the financial resources available to
us, including our internally generated funds and currently
available banking facilities, we believe that we will be in a
position to fund our capital requirements in the 2010 fiscal
year.
36
Pension Plan
Funding
Our defined benefit obligation, which takes into account future
compensation increases, amounted to 413 million
at September 30, 2009, compared
to 376 million at September 30, 2008. The
fair value of plan assets as of September 30, 2009,
was 319 million, compared
to 333 million as of September 30, 2008.
The actual return on plan assets between the last measurement
dates amounted to 2.4 percent,
or 7 million, for domestic (German) plans and
negative 6.0 percent, or
negative 2 million, for foreign plans, compared
to the expected return on plan assets for that period of
7.1 percent for domestic plans and 7.2 percent for
foreign plans. We have estimated the return on plan assets for
the next fiscal year to be 6.3 percent,
or 18 million, for domestic plans and
7.2 percent, or 2 million, for foreign
plans.
At September 30, 2008 and 2009, the combined funding status
of our pension plans reflected an under-funding
of 43 million and 94 million,
respectively.
Our investment approach with respect to the pension plans
involves employing a sufficient level of flexibility to capture
investment opportunities as they occur, while maintaining
reasonable parameters to ensure that prudence and care are
exercised in the execution of the investment program. The
pension plans assets are invested with several investment
managers. The plans employ a mix of active and passive
investment management programs. Considering the duration of the
underlying liabilities, a portfolio of investments of plan
assets in equity securities, debt securities and other assets is
targeted to maximize the long-term return on plan assets for a
given level of risk. Investment risk is monitored on an ongoing
basis through periodic portfolio reviews, meetings with
investment managers and liability measurements. Investment
policies and strategies are periodically reviewed to ensure the
objectives of the plans are met considering any changes in
benefit plan design, market conditions or other material items.
Our asset allocation targets for pension plan assets are based
on our assessment of business and financial conditions,
demographic and actuarial data, funding characteristics, related
risk factors, market sensitivity analyses and other relevant
factors. The overall allocation is expected to help protect the
plans level of funding while generating sufficiently
stable real returns (i.e., net of inflation) to meet current and
future benefit payment needs. Due to active portfolio
management, the asset allocation may differ from the target
allocation up to certain limits. As a matter of policy, our
pension plans do not invest in our shares.
Financial
Instruments
We periodically enter into derivatives, including foreign
currency forward and option contracts as well as interest rate
swap agreements. The objective of these transactions is to
reduce the impact of interest rate and exchange rate
fluctuations on our foreign currency denominated net future cash
flows. We do not enter into derivatives for trading or
speculative purposes. For further details regarding our
financial risk management and risks arising in connection with
financial instruments, see notes 36 and 37 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Overall statement
of the Management Board with respect to Our Financial Condition
as of the Date of this Report
Our 2009 fiscal year was significantly impacted by the overall
slowdown of the economy. Our cost saving efforts, which we
started to implement with our IFX10+ cost-reduction program
during the fourth quarter of the 2008 fiscal year, helped us to
reduce the negative impact of the economic slowdown. However, we
must continue to improve our cost structure and product margin
to adjust them to reduced revenues in order to reach our overall
margin goal of a minimum of 10 percent while maintaining
our technological leadership.
The successful financing measures we executed during the 2009
fiscal year resulted in a significant improvement in our
financial condition. As of September 30, 2009, our debt to
equity ratio is 36 percent and our net cash position
amounts to 657 million compared to a
debt-to-equity-ratio of 54 percent and a net debt position
of 287 million as of September 30, 2008.
This should give us a strong foundation to meet future
obligations and our strategic objectives.
37
Employees
The following table indicates the composition of our workforce
by function and region at the end of the fiscal years
indicated(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Function:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
20,376
|
|
|
|
|
19,358
|
|
|
|
|
17,338
|
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
5,833
|
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
Sales & Marketing
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
|
1,583
|
|
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon
|
|
|
29,598
|
|
|
|
|
29,119
|
|
|
|
|
26,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda
|
|
|
13,481
|
|
|
|
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
43,079
|
|
|
|
|
41,343
|
|
|
|
|
26,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
|
10,053
|
|
|
|
|
9,160
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
5,564
|
|
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
|
|
|
4,676
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
13,145
|
|
|
|
|
12,897
|
|
|
|
|
11,803
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon
|
|
|
29,598
|
|
|
|
|
29,119
|
|
|
|
|
26,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda
|
|
|
13,481
|
|
|
|
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
43,079
|
|
|
|
|
41,343
|
|
|
|
|
26,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately 860 employees are to
be transferred to Lantiq upon closing of the sale of the
Wireline Communications business.
|
During the 2008 fiscal year, the number of employees in our
logic business decreased slightly, primarily due to the
formation of the Bipolar joint venture with Siemens and further
decreases in the number of production employees, primarily in
Asia/Pacific. These decreases were partly offset by employees
that joined the company as a result of the acquisitions we made
during the year.
In the 2009 fiscal year, our workforce decreased throughout all
functions and regions by 9 percent, primarily as a result
of our IFX 10+ cost-reduction program as well as the sale of the
SensoNor business. Furthermore, Qimonda was deconsolidated upon
filing for insolvency.
In addition to our own employees, we hire temporary staff in our
different business areas; the number of hired temporary staff is
adjusted flexibly based on our capacity needs.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent
upon accounting methods, assumptions and estimates that we use
as a basis for the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements. We have identified the following critical accounting
policies and related assumptions, estimates and uncertainties,
which we believe are essential to understanding the underlying
financial reporting risks and the impact that these accounting
methods, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties have on our
reported financial results.
Revenue
Recognition
We generally market our products to a wide variety of customers
and a network of distributors. Our policy is to record revenue
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, the risks and rewards
of ownership have been transferred to the customer,
38
the amount of revenue can be measured reliably, and collection
of the related receivable is reasonably assured. We recognize
revenue on sales to distributors using the sell in
method (i.e. when product is sold to the distributor) rather
than the sell through method (i.e. when the product
is sold by the distributor to the end user). In accordance with
established business practice in the semiconductor industry,
distributors can apply for price protection. Under price
protection a credit may be provided to the distributor if we
lower our price on products held in the distributors
inventory. In addition, a distributor can apply for a
ship & debit credit, when the distributor wishes to
reduce the sales price to an end customer on a specific sales
transaction. The authorization of the distributors refund
remains fully within our control. We calculate the provision for
price protection in the same period the related revenue is
recorded based on historical price trends and sales rebates,
analysis of credit memo data, specific information contained in
the price protection agreement, and other factors known at the
time. The historical price trend is determined based on the
difference between the invoiced price and the standard list
price to the distributor. The outstanding inventory period, the
visibility into the standard inventory pricing for standard
products, and the long distributor pricing history enable us to
reliably estimate price protection provisions. We monitor
potential price adjustments on an ongoing basis.
In addition, distributors can, in certain cases, also apply for
stock rotation and scrap allowances. Allowances for stock
rotation returns are accrued based on expected stock rotation as
per the contractual agreement. Distributor scrap allowances are
accrued based on the contractual agreement and, upon
authorization of the claim, reimbursed up to a certain maximum
of the average inventory value. Historically, actual returns
under such return provisions have been insignificant. We monitor
such product returns on an ongoing basis.
In some cases, rebate programs are offered to specific customers
or distributors whereby the customer or distributor may apply
for a rebate upon achievement of a defined sales volume.
Distributors are also partially compensated for commonly defined
cooperative advertising on a
case-by-case
basis.
The determination of these provisions and allowances requires
the exercise of substantial judgment in evaluating the
above-mentioned factors and requires material estimates,
including forecasted demand, returns and industry pricing
assumptions.
In future periods, we may be required to accrue additional
provisions due to (1) deterioration in the semiconductor
pricing environment, (2) reductions in anticipated demand
for semiconductor products or (3) lack of market acceptance
for new products. If these or other factors result in a
significant adjustment to sales discount and price protection
allowances, they could significantly impact our future operating
results.
We have entered into licensing agreements for our technology in
the past, and anticipate that we will increase our efforts to
monetize the value of our technology in the future. As with
certain of our existing licensing agreements, any new licensing
arrangements may include capacity reservation agreements with
the licensee. The process of determining the appropriate revenue
recognition in such transactions is highly complex and requires
significant judgment, which includes evaluating material
estimates in the determination of fair value and the level of
our continuing involvement.
Recoverability
of Non-Financial Assets
Our business is extremely capital-intensive, and requires a
significant investment in property, plant and equipment. Due to
rapid technological change in the semiconductor industry, we
anticipate the level of capital expenditures to be significant
in future periods. During the 2009 fiscal year, we
spent 103 million on purchases of property,
plant and equipment. At September 30, 2009, the carrying
value of our property, plant and equipment
was 928 million. We have acquired other
businesses, which resulted in the generation of significant
amounts of long-lived intangible assets, including goodwill. At
September 30, 2009, we had long-lived intangible assets of
369 million.
In accordance with the provisions of International Accounting
Standard (IAS) 36, Impairment of Assets,
we test goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets for
impairment at least once a year.
39
We also review long-lived assets, including intangible assets,
for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying value of an asset to the recoverable
amount, which is the higher of the assets value in use and
its fair value less costs to sell. If such assets are considered
to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the
amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their
recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is generally based on
discounted estimated future cash flows. Considerable management
judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows.
During the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years, impairment charges
of 130 million and 3 million,
respectively, were recognized on long-lived assets, including
intangible assets.
Goodwill is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment
annually in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year as well as
whenever there are events or changes in circumstances
(triggering events) that suggest that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Goodwill is carried at cost less
any accumulated impairment losses. The recoverable amount is the
higher of fair value less costs to sell and of value in use. We
do not determine fair value less costs to sell or value in use
using estimates, averages or computational short-cuts, but apply
the cash-generating unit concept (CGU). Goodwill
acquired in a business combination is allocated to CGUs that are
expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Our
CGUs represent the lowest level at which the goodwill is
monitored for internal management purposes. This level is
beneath the segment level and the smallest group of assets that
generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely
independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups
thereof. If the carrying amount of the allocated goodwill
exceeds its recoverable amount, the allocated goodwill must be
reduced accordingly. An impairment loss recognized for goodwill
is not reversed in a subsequent period. The determination of
fair value of the CGUs requires considerable judgment by
management.
We determine the recoverable amount of a CGU based on discounted
cash flow calculations. We believe that this is the most
meaningful method, in order to reflect the cyclicality of the
industry and to determine the recoverable amount of the CGUs.
This approach was applied consistently in fiscal years 2008 and
2009. The material assumptions underlying our discounted cash
flow model for all of our CGUs include the weighted average cost
of capital (WACC) as well as the terminal growth
rate of the CGUs. The calculation of the discount rate is based
on a market participants view of the asset or CGU. In
accordance with IAS 36, we determine the appropriate WACC for
the CGUs based on market information, including our peer
groups beta factors and leverage, and other market
borrowing rates. The terminal value growth rate has been taken
from available market studies from market research institutes.
For specific assumptions used see note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements.
The assumptions used in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 reflected
market-driven changes but did not differ significantly.
In addition, the individual impairment tests include sensitivity
analyses taking into account the above-mentioned material
assumptions. As part of the sensitivity analysis for each
impairment test for a CGU, these parameters were also
subsequently reviewed until the approval of the consolidated
financial statements by the management board.
We did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges in the
2007, 2008, and 2009 fiscal years.
Valuation of
Inventory
Historically, the semiconductor industry has experienced periods
of extreme volatility in product demand and in industry
capacity, resulting in significant price fluctuations. Since
semiconductor demand is concentrated in such highly-volatile
industries as wireless communications and the computer industry,
this volatility can be extreme. This volatility has also
resulted in significant fluctuations in price within relatively
short time-frames.
40
As a matter of policy, we value inventory at the lower of
acquisition or production cost or net realizable value. We
review the recoverability of inventory based on regular
monitoring of the size and composition of inventory positions,
current economic events and market conditions, projected future
product demand, and the pricing environment. This evaluation is
inherently judgmental and requires material estimates, including
both forecasted product demand and pricing environment, both of
which may be susceptible to significant change. At
September 30, 2008 and 2009, total inventory
was 665 million and 460 million,
respectively.
In future periods, write-downs of inventory may be necessary due
to (1) reduced semiconductor demand in the industries we
serve, including the computer and wireless communications
industries, (2) technological obsolescence due to rapid
developments of new products and technological improvements, or
(3) changes in economic or other events and conditions that
impact the market price for our products. These factors could
result in adjustments to the valuation of inventory in future
periods, and significantly impact our future operating results.
Pension Plan
Accounting
We operate various pension plans. The plans are generally funded
through payments to trustee-administered funds, determined by
periodic actuarial calculations. We have both defined benefit
and defined contribution plans. A defined contribution plan is a
pension plan under which we pay fixed contributions into a
separate entity (a fund). We therefore have no legal or
constructive obligations to pay further contributions if one of
its defined contribution plans does not hold sufficient assets
to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service
in the current and prior periods.
A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that is not a defined
contribution plan. The liability recognized in the balance sheet
in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value
of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less
the fair value of the plan assets, together with adjustments for
past service costs. The defined benefit obligation is calculated
annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit
credit method. The present value of the defined benefit
obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future
cash outflows using interest rates of high-quality corporate
bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits
will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating the
terms of the related pension liability.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions are recognized outside
profit or loss in the Consolidated Statement of Income and
Expense Recognized in Equity in the period in which they occur
(SoRIE approach).
Past-service costs are recognized immediately in profit or loss,
unless the changes to the pension plan are conditional on the
employees remaining in service for a specified period of time
(the vesting period). In this case, the past-service costs are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
We pay contributions to publicly or privately administered
pension insurance plans. We have no further payment obligations
once the contributions have been paid. The contributions are
recognized as employee benefit expense when they are due. We
record a liability for amounts payable under the provisions of
our various defined contribution plans. Prepaid contributions
are recognized as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a
reduction in the future payments is available.
A significant variation in one or more of the underlying
assumptions could have a material effect on the measurement of
our long-term obligation.
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Defined
benefit plans determine the entitlements of their beneficiaries.
The net present value of the ultimate future benefit entitlement
for service already rendered is represented by the defined
benefit obligation (DBO), which is actuarially
calculated with consideration for future compensation increases.
41
The pension liabilities are equal to the DBO when the
assumptions used to calculate the DBO such as discount rate,
compensation increase rate and projected future pension
increases are achieved. In the case of funded plans, the market
value of the external assets is offset against the benefit
obligations. The net liability or asset recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets is in general equal to the under- or
over-funding of the DBO in this case, when the expected return
on plan assets is subsequently realized.
The actuarial gains or losses from differences between actual
experience and the assumptions made for the compensation
increase rate and projected future pension increases, as well as
the differences between actual and expected returns on plan
assets, are recognized directly in the equity in the statement
of recognized income and expense.
Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The recognized expense related to
pension plans and similar commitments in the consolidated
statements of operations is referred to as net periodic pension
cost (NPPC) and consists of several separately
calculated and presented components, including service cost,
which is the actuarial net present value of the part of the DBO
for the service rendered in the respective fiscal year; the
interest cost for the expense derived from the addition of
accrued interest on the DBO at the end of the preceding fiscal
year on the basis of the identified discount rate; and the
expected return on plan assets in the case of funded benefit
plans.
In the consolidated statements of operations, NPPC is allocated
among functional costs (cost of sales, research and development
expenses, selling and general administrative expenses),
according to the function of the employee groups accruing
benefits.
In the consolidated statements of operations, NPPC expenses
before income taxes for our pension plans for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
were 29 million, 15 million, and
5 million, respectively.
The consolidated balance sheets include the following
significant components related to pension plans and similar
commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Non-current pension assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current pension liabilities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current pension liabilities
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows. We make payments directly to the
participants in the case of unfunded benefit plans and the
payments are included in net cash used in operating activities.
For funded pension plans, the participants are paid by the
external pension fund and accordingly these payments are cash
neutral to us. In this case, our regular funding (service cost)
and supplemental cash contributions result in net cash used in
operating activities.
In the consolidated statements of cash flows, our principal
pension and other postretirement benefits resulted in net cash
used in operating activities from continuing operations
of 6 million and 11 million in the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
42
Pension benefits Sensitivity
Analysis. A one percentage point change in
the established assumptions used for the calculation of the NPPC
for the 2010 fiscal year would result in the following impact on
the NPPC for the 2010 fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on net periodic pension costs
|
|
|
|
One percentage
|
|
|
One percentage
|
|
|
|
increase
|
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Rate of projected future pension increases
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Increases and decreases in the discount rate, rate of
compensation increase and rate of projected future pension
increases which are used in determining the DBO do not have a
symmetrical effect on NPPC primarily due to the compound
interest effect created when determining the present value of
the future pension benefit. If more than one of the assumptions
were changed simultaneously, the impact would not necessarily be
the same as would be the case if only one assumption were
changed in isolation.
For a discussion of our current funding status and the impact of
these critical assumptions, see note 35 to our consolidated
financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2009.
Realization of
Deferred Tax Assets
At September 30, 2009, total net deferred tax assets
were 383 million. Included in this amount are
the tax benefits of net operating loss and credit carry-forwards
of approximately 361 million, net of the
valuation allowance. These tax loss and credit carry-forwards
generally do not expire under current law.
We evaluate our deferred tax asset position and the need for a
valuation allowance on a regular basis. The assessment requires
the exercise of judgment on the part of our management with
respect to, among other things, benefits that could be realized
from available tax strategies and future taxable income, as well
as other positive and negative factors. The ultimate realization
of deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate
the appropriate character of future taxable income sufficient to
utilize loss carry-forwards or tax credits before their
expiration. Since we have incurred a cumulative loss in certain
tax jurisdictions over the three-year period ended
September 30, 2009, the impact of forecasted future taxable
income is excluded from such an assessment. For these tax
jurisdictions, the assessment was therefore based only on the
benefits that could be realized from available tax strategies
and the reversal of temporary differences in future periods.
As a result of this assessment, we increased the deferred tax
asset valuation allowance in the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years
by 183 million and 88 million,
respectively, in order to reduce the deferred tax asset to an
amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized in
the future. We expect to continue to recognize low levels of
deferred tax benefits in the 2010 fiscal year, until such time
as taxable income is generated in tax jurisdictions that would
enable us to utilize our tax loss carry-forwards in those
jurisdictions.
The recorded amount of total deferred tax assets could be
reduced if our estimates of projected future taxable income and
benefits from available tax strategies are lowered, or if
changes in current tax regulations are enacted that impose
restrictions on the timing or extent of our ability to utilize
tax loss and credit carry-forwards in the future.
43
Provisions
We are subject to various legal actions and claims, including
intellectual property matters, which arise in and outside the
normal course of business. Current proceedings are described in
detail in note 38 to our consolidated financial statements.
We regularly assess the likelihood of any adverse outcome or
judgments related to these matters, as well as estimating the
range of possible losses and recoveries. Liabilities, including
provisions for significant litigation costs, related to legal
proceedings are recorded when it is probable that a liability
has been incurred and the associated amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount of loss is
within a range of amounts and no amount within the range is a
better estimate than any other amount, the mid-point in the
range is accrued. Accordingly, we have recorded a provision and
charged operating income in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements related to certain asserted and unasserted
claims existing as of each balance sheet date. As additional
information becomes available, any potential liability related
to these matters is reassessed and the estimates are revised, if
necessary. These provisions would be subject to change in the
future based on new developments in each matter, or changes in
circumstances, which could have a material impact on our results
of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
notes 2, 36 and 37 to our consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Market risk is the risk of loss related to adverse changes in
market prices of financial instruments, including those related
to commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates.
We are exposed to various financial market risks in the ordinary
course of business transactions, primarily resulting from
changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest
rates. We enter into diverse financial transactions with
multiple counterparties to limit such risks. Derivative
instruments are used only for hedging purposes and not for
trading or speculative purposes.
Commodity
Price Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risks with respect to raw
materials used in the manufacture of our products. We seek to
minimize these risks through our sourcing policies (including
the use of multiple sources, where possible) and our operating
procedures. We do not use derivative financial instruments to
manage any exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices
remaining after these operating measures.
Foreign
Exchange and Interest Risk
Although we prepare our consolidated financial statements in
Euro, major portions of our sales volumes as well as costs
relating to the design, production and manufacturing of products
are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a multinational
company, our activities in markets around the world create cash
flows in a number of different currencies. Exchange rate
fluctuations may have substantial effects on our sales, our
costs and our overall results of operations.
Management has established a policy to require our individual
legal entities to manage their respective foreign exchange risk
against their respective functional currencies. The legal
entities are required to internally hedge their respective
foreign exchange risk exposure with our Finance and Treasury
department. To manage their foreign exchange risk arising from
future commercial transactions and recognized assets and
liabilities, the individual entities use forward contracts
transacted with our Finance and Treasury department.
44
Our policy with respect to limiting short-term foreign currency
exposure generally is to economically hedge at least
75 percent of our estimated net exposure for the initial
two-month period, at least 50 percent of our estimated net
exposure for the third month and, depending on the nature of the
underlying transactions, a significant portion for the periods
thereafter. Part of the foreign currency exposure cannot be
mitigated due to differences between actual and forecasted
amounts. We calculate this net exposure on a cash-flow basis
considering balance sheet items, actual orders received or made
and all other planned revenues and expenses.
The table below provides information about our derivative
financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in foreign
currency exchange and interest rates as of the end of our 2009
fiscal year. For foreign currency exchange forward contracts
related to certain sale and purchase transactions and debt
service payments denominated in foreign currencies, the table
presents the notional amounts and the weighted average
contractual foreign exchange rates. At September 30, 2009,
our foreign currency forward contracts mainly had terms up to
one year. Our interest rate swaps expire in 2010. We do not
enter into derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
Contract amount
|
|
|
forward
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
buy/(sell)
|
|
|
exchange rate
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
1.36090
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
1.42415
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
133.07333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
134.06714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2.05716
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2.05438
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Britain pound
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0.87702
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
4.85275
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We record our derivative instruments according to the provisions
of IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation
and IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement. IAS 32 and IAS 39 require all derivative
instruments to be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair
value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair
values of those derivatives are accounted for depending on the
use of the derivative instrument and whether it qualifies for
hedge accounting. During the 2009 fiscal year, we designated as
cash flow hedges certain foreign exchange forward contracts
related to highly probable forecasted sales denominated in U.S.
dollars. We did not record any ineffectiveness for these hedges
in the 2009 fiscal year. However, we excluded differences
between spot and forward rates and the time value from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness and included this component of
the financial instruments gain or loss as a part of cost
of goods sold. We estimate that 0 million of the net
result recognized directly in other components of equity as of
September 30, 2009, will be reclassified into earnings
during the 2010 fiscal year. All foreign exchange derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges held as of September 30,
2009 have maturities of five months or less. Foreign exchange
derivatives entered into to offset exposure to anticipated cash
flows that do not meet the requirements for applying hedge
accounting are marked to market at each reporting period, with
unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings. For the 2009
fiscal year, no gains or losses were reclassified from other
components of equity as a result of the discontinuance of
foreign exchanges cash flow hedges resulting from a
determination that it was probable that the original forecasted
transaction would not occur.
45
In the 2009 fiscal year, foreign exchange transaction gains
were 5 million and were offset by losses from
our economic hedge transactions of 16 million,
resulting in net foreign exchange losses
of 11 million. This compared to foreign exchange
transaction result of 0 million, which were
offset by gains from our economic hedge transactions
of 15 million, resulting in net foreign exchange
gains of 15 million in the 2008 fiscal year. A
large portion of our manufacturing, selling and marketing,
general and administrative, and R&D expenses are incurred
in currencies other than the Euro, primarily the
U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, Singapore dollar, and Malaysian
ringgit. Fluctuations in the exchange rates of these currencies
to the Euro had an effect on profitability in the 2007, 2008 and
2009 fiscal years.
Interest Rate
Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk through our financial
assets and debt instruments resulting from issuance of bonds and
credit facilities. Due to the high volatility of our core
business and the need to maintain high operational flexibility,
our liquid financial assets are kept at a high level. These
assets are mainly invested in short-term interest rate
instruments. The risk of changing interest rates affecting these
assets is partially offset by financial liabilities, some of
which are based on variable interest rates.
To reduce the risk caused by changes in market interest rates,
we attempt to align the duration of the interest rates of our
debts and current assets by the use of interest rate derivatives.
We entered into interest rate swap agreements that primarily
convert the fixed interest rate on our 2003 convertible bond to
a floating interest rate based on the relevant European
Interbank Offering Rate (EURIBOR).
Outlook
Industry
Environment and Outlook
In the fall of 2008, the world economy entered the deepest
recession of the last 60 years, which significantly
affected the global semiconductor market. Strong monetary and
fiscal policy measures across advanced and emerging economies,
however, supported demand and mitigated an imminent global
financial collapse. In the summer of 2009, several Asian
economies began growing again and economies elsewhere stabilized
or began modest recoveries. Nevertheless, the pace of recovery
is expected to be slow (International Monetary Fund, October
2009).
A return to growth in the world economy should positively affect
the global semiconductor market. After a low double-digit
contraction of the market in the 2009 calendar year, analysts
expect the global semiconductor market to grow in the 2010
calendar year. WSTS, for example, forecasts in November 2009
that the overall market will increase by 12.2 percent (in
U.S. dollar terms) in the 2010 calendar year (compared with
its spring 2009 forecast of 7.3 percent growth). In
November 2009, WSTS forecasts for the 2009 calendar year a
decline of world semiconductor revenues of 11.5 percent,
compared to a decline of 21.6 percent predicted in its
spring 2009 forecast. For the 2011 calendar year, WSTS currently
forecasts world semiconductor revenue-growth of 9.3 percent.
Outlook
Significant planning assumptions: When
preparing this outlook, we made certain important planning
assumptions.
Due to the fast pace of developments in the semiconductor market
and the cyclical nature of our industry, we can only give an
outlook for our 2010 fiscal year. Beyond the 2010 fiscal year,
we can only comment on general trends in the semiconductor
market.
On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business to
Lantiq. This transaction closed on November 6, 2009. We and
Lantiq have entered into product
46
supply agreements as well as into various transitional service
agreements. Since closing, our business with Lantiq is reported
in the Other Operating Segments.
All statements below reflect our operations without the former
Wireline Communications business. In the future, we will focus
on our four segments Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security and Wireless
Solutions, and will concentrate our resources more closely on
growth and leadership in these four market segments.
Our Management Board uses Segment Result to assess the operating
performance of the reportable segments and as a basis for
allocating resources among our segments. We define Segment
Result as operating income (loss), excluding asset impairments,
net, restructuring and other related closure costs, net,
stock-based compensation expense, acquisition-related
amortization and gains (losses), gains (losses) on sales of
assets, businesses, or interests in subsidiaries, and other
income (expense), including litigation settlement costs. The
gain from the sale of the Wireline Communications business will
be included in results from discontinued operations, net of
income taxes, for the first quarter of the 2010 fiscal year and
therefore will have no impact on Segment Result.
The outlook for the 2010 fiscal year assumes that we will
complete the sale of ALTIS, our manufacturing joint venture with
IBM in France, in the first half of the 2010 fiscal year. Should
this not be feasible, we have to re-assess all options. In all
conceivable scenarios, we anticipate non-recurring charges as
part of our non-segment result. Although the exact amount of
such charges cannot be reliably assessed currently, such
expenses could have a material adverse effect on our results and
financial position.
For the purpose of forecasting our total Segment Result from
continuing operations in the 2010 fiscal year, we assumed a
U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rate of 1.50. About
50 percent of our revenues and 35 percent of our costs
are exposed to the U.S. dollar or to currencies strongly
correlated to the U.S. dollar. Any strengthening
(weakening) of the U.S. dollar against the Euro would have
a positive (negative) impact on revenues and earnings, primarily
in the segments with the largest exposure to the
U.S. dollar and currencies strongly correlated to the
U.S. dollar, namely Industrial & Multimarket and
Wireless Solutions. A fluctuation of the U.S. dollar/Euro
exchange rate would not, however, have any material impact on
earnings for the first half of the 2010 fiscal year, as we have
already hedged a significant portion of the expected cash flow
for this period. For the remainder of the 2010 fiscal year,
however, fluctuations in the U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rate
would have a material impact on revenues and earnings. If the
exchange rate for the U.S. dollar against the Euro deviates
from our forecast by one cent, we estimate that such deviation
would lead to a corresponding deviation in combined Segment
Result versus our planning assumption of approximately
1.5 million per quarter.
Revenues
Orders have started to recover early in the 2009 calendar year
and so far have continued to increase. General demand trends
therefore appear positive. That said, the speed of the bookings
recovery in the final months of our 2009 fiscal year leaves an
element of uncertainty with regards to the sustainability of the
pace of recovery. As such, the industry recovery as well as our
outlook is subject to risks. Nonetheless, based on the current
order backlog and outlook, we expect total revenues in the 2010
fiscal year, consisting of the operating segments Automotive,
Industrial & Multimarket, Chip Card &
Security, and Wireless Solutions, as well as Other Operating
Segments and Corporate & Eliminations, to increase by
ten percent or more compared to the 2009 fiscal year. The
year-over-year
increase is expected to be driven by increases in revenues in
all operating segments, particularly in our Automotive segment,
with lower revenue increases in the Wireless Solutions and
Industrial & Multimarket segments, and the lowest
growth rate in the Chip Card & Security segment. Our
product supply agreements with Lantiq are expected to positively
impact revenues in the Other Operating Segments by a mid- to
high double-digit million Euro amount.
Beyond the 2010 fiscal year, we believe that the three current
global trends towards improved energy efficiency, security, and
communications will continue to gain in importance, positively
impacting revenue
47
growth in our four operating segments. In particular, the need
for energy efficient semiconductors predominantly drives demand
for products in our Automotive and Industrial &
Multimarket businesses. Data protection and secure
authentication issues are mostly addressed by our Chip
Card & Security segment, while our Wireless Solutions
segment benefits from the continued growth in mobile
communications and data access. In terms of regions, we expect
the most important growth driver to be demand from Asia. In the
2009 fiscal year, we generated 45 percent of our total
revenues in this region. Semiconductor demand growth in Asia is
driven by general economic growth in the region and by
country-specific trends. China, for example, is investing
heavily in the build-out of its railway network along with its
fleet of trains. Furthermore, Asian countries generally are
building-out their electricity generation and distribution
infrastructure and are focusing on high silicon content wind and
solar power plants for energy generation. We expect that
projects such as these will have a favorable impact on demand
for the power semiconductors offered by our
Industrial & Multimarket segment.
With regards to our individual operating segments, the
Automotive segment is benefiting from end market demand for
vehicles generally stabilizing and in some regions returning to
growth. In addition to improving end demand trends, as a
component supplier we anticipate benefiting from inventory
replenishment throughout the supply chain. Finally, the shift
from mid-range and high-end vehicles with comparatively higher
semiconductor content towards small cars with comparatively
lower silicon content appears to be coming to a halt and may
potentially reverse. As one of the two leading automotive
semiconductor companies worldwide, with a 9.5 percent
market share in 2008 (Strategy Analytics, May 2009), we are
well-positioned to benefit from these trends. Longer-term, our
products will continue to support the electrification of the
drive train and the increased market penetration of hybrid cars,
which we serve with our
HybridPACKtm
modules and other automotive power components such as discrete
IGBTs and Power MOSFETs.
We were the number one supplier of power semiconductors and
power modules with a 10.2 percent market share in 2008 (IMS
Research, July 2009). We expect revenues to increase in the
Industrial & Multimarket segment in the 2010 fiscal
year, driven by a recovery in end demand for computing,
communications and industrial products and inventory
replenishment throughout the supply chain. The expansion of
infrastructure projects and building of power lines, mostly in
China, should add to the 2010 revenue increase. Beyond 2010, the
segment will, among others, benefit from growth in demand for
power semiconductors for renewable energy applications. In terms
of regions, Asia is expected to be a major contributor to such
growth as local economic dynamics, including increased wealth
and per capita income, support middle class demand for home
appliances and electronic goods.
In the Wireless Solutions segment, where we were number four in
the wireless ASSP business in the 2008 calendar year in terms of
global market share (iSuppli, June 2009), we anticipate revenues
will increase in the 2010 fiscal year. This is expected to be
driven primarily by the
ramp-up of
single-chip mobile phone platforms at Nokia and other major
customers as well as generally increased demand of major mobile
phone platform customers for both HSDPA and Ultra Low Cost
solutions. In the 2010 fiscal year, we also expect additional
growth from the launch of our mobile phone platform for HSUPA
solutions based on 65-nanometer structure size.
Finally, revenues in the Chip Card & Security segment
are also anticipated to increase in the 2010 fiscal year
compared to the 2009 fiscal year, mostly due to sales growth in
the ID card (government ID, health cards, driver licenses,
etc.), Pay-TV, and SIM card businesses. As the number one
supplier of chip card and security solutions, with a
26 percent market share in 2008 (Frost &
Sullivan, October 2009), we will focus on further developing our
core competencies, tailored security, contactless applications
and embedded control.
Combined Segment
Result
In the 2010 fiscal year, we expect combined Segment Result to
improve considerably from the 2009 fiscal year and to be
significantly positive, with a combined Segment Result margin of
a mid single-digit
48
percentage. This outlook is given under the assumption that our
manufacturing capacity utilization will not experience any
significant decline over the course of the 2010 fiscal year,
which could occur, for example, as a result of lower customer
orders due to renewed inventory correction in the supply chain.
We expect an improvement in combined Segment Result despite the
termination of temporary cost reduction measures initiated under
our cost reduction program IFX10+ in the 2009 fiscal year. Most
notably, our temporary labor cost reduction measures (short-time
work and unpaid leave) ended on a world-wide basis effective
October 1, 2009, which we anticipate will lead to an
increase in quarterly expenses of around 25 million
in the 2010 fiscal year, compared to the third and fourth
quarters of the 2009 fiscal year. Despite such cost increases,
we expect positive combined Segment Result for the 2010 fiscal
year. This will be driven by generally higher revenues,
significantly higher utilization rates in our manufacturing
facilities and continued strict cost discipline. Regarding the
latter, we will continue to streamline and reduce the number of
processes and interfaces in the company. Beyond the 2010 fiscal
year, and assuming continued revenue growth, we expect to
realize earnings growth in excess of our revenue growth also
driven by an effort to improve the gross margin of our product
portfolio.
Research and
Development Expenses
We expect expenses for R&D in the 2010 fiscal year to
increase broadly in line with revenues, compared to the 2009
fiscal year when excluding the effects of the termination of
temporary cost reduction measures initiated under our cost
reduction program IFX10+. The increase of our R&D expenses,
aside from the end of our temporary labor cost reduction
measures, will be driven by expenditures for new products and
technologies. Beyond the 2010 fiscal year, we expect that
expenditures for R&D will rise in order to support the
maintenance and broadening of our product base, which will be
required to address the numerous growth opportunities in our
markets. The longer term growth rate of our R&D expenses,
however, is expected to remain below the rate of revenue growth.
In the Automotive segment, our R&D efforts in the 2010
fiscal year are mainly focused on development of power,
microcontroller, and sensor products based on CMOS, bipolar,
embedded flash and smart power technologies.
Energy efficiency and system miniaturization are key drivers for
R&D in the Industrial & Multimarket segment in
the 2010 fiscal year. The development of next-generation power
technologies for industrial drives, power supply applications
and new package concepts are examples of areas of emphasis in
our R&D efforts.
In the Chip Card & Security segment, we have
intensified our R&D efforts in developing next-generation,
highly secure technologies and platforms for use in many fields
of application.
In the Wireless Solutions segment, our R&D spending is
focused, for example, on developing next-generation
system-on-a-chip
products and system solutions for mobile phones. In addition, we
develop process technologies in alliances with several partners
and consortia in order to maintain a competitive technology
roadmap at an affordable cost level.
Fixed assets
investment and depreciation
We continue to pursue a differentiated manufacturing strategy
for our four operating segments. In the context of this
strategy, we will continue to invest in manufacturing capacities
for special processes, particularly in the power semiconductor
arena. In contrast, we do not plan to invest in our own
manufacturing capacities starting with 65-nanometer structure
sizes for the standard semiconductor manufacturing process (so
called CMOS technology).
Given the demand trends described above, we anticipate that our
annual investment in property, plant and equipment and
intangible assets, including capitalized development costs, will
increase to approximately 220 million to
250 million in the 2010 fiscal year. This compares to
an investment in property, plant and equipment and intangible
assets including capitalized development costs of
154 million in the
49
2009 fiscal year. In subsequent fiscal years, we will tailor our
capital investment to the demand development, but expect to
limit such investments to less than 10 percent of our
revenues.
In the 2010 fiscal year, we expect depreciation expense for
tangible assets to decrease compared to the 2009 fiscal year and
to total around 340 million. Additional amortization
of intangible assets, including capitalized development costs,
should be around 60 million. Total depreciation and
amortization is therefore expected to be approximately
400 million in the 2010 fiscal year. In the 2009
fiscal year, depreciation was 466 million and
amortization was 47 million, for total
depreciation & amortization of 513 million.
Beyond the 2010 fiscal year, we expect annual depreciation and
amortization expense, including amortization charges for
capitalized development costs, to decrease further and to
approach our capital investment.
Major financing
measures
Having placed subordinated convertible notes due 2014 with a
nominal value of 196 million and having issued
337 million new shares for a gross cash inflow of
725 million in the 2009 fiscal year, we currently do
not foresee undertaking any major capital raising measures in
the 2010 fiscal year in order to finance our operations or meet
our debt maturities.
On June 5, 2010, our subordinated convertible notes with a
book value outstanding as of September 30, 2009 of
425 million will come due. Given our gross cash
position of 1,507 million as of September 30,
2009, our expected improvement in combined Segment Result and
expected depreciation and amortization in excess of capital
expenditures for the 2010 fiscal year, we expect to redeem these
convertible notes out of existing cash reserves. Similarly, over
the course of the 2010 fiscal year, we expect to make other debt
repayments totaling 96 million out of existing cash
reserves.
Over the course of the 2010 fiscal year, we anticipate that the
expected improvement in combined Segment Result, lower cash
outflows for restructuring measures, the cash inflow from the
sale of our Wireline Communications business, and depreciation
and amortization in excess of capital expenditures should
contribute positively to free cash flow. Nonetheless, given the
debt maturities described above, potential cash outflows in
connection with ALTIS as well as the insolvency of Qimonda and
given an increase in our net working capital, our gross cash
position as of September 30, 2010 is expected to be below
our gross cash position as of September 30, 2009.
Nevertheless, we expect that we will have ample cash at the end
of our 2010 fiscal year to meet all of our anticipated
obligations.
Recent
Developments Related to Qimonda
We currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in the memory
products company Qimonda, which was carved out from Infineon in
2006. On January 23, 2009, Qimonda filed for insolvency,
and formal insolvency proceedings were opened in the local
registry court in Munich on April 1, 2009. We report the
results of Qimonda as discontinued operations in our
consolidated financial statements and have deconsolidated
Qimonda as of January 23, 2009. The resolution of
Qimondas insolvency proceedings remains highly uncertain.
See Risk Factors We may face significant
liabilities as a result of the insolvency of Qimonda.
For further details regarding the impact of Qimondas
insolvency on our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows in the 2009 fiscal year see note 5 to our
consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent
Events
We closed the sale our Wireline Communications business to
Lantiq on November 6, 2009. The final purchase price
amounts to approximately 243 million reflecting
adjustments under the asset purchase agreement. On the closing
date we received cash consideration
of 223 million. The final portion of the
purchase price of up to 20 million will become
due in the fourth quarter of the 2010 fiscal year.
50
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below
before making an investment decision. The occurrence of any of
the following events could harm us. If these events occur, the
trading price of our shares could decline, and you may lose all
or part of your investment. Additional risks not currently known
to us or that we now deem immaterial may also harm us and affect
your investment.
Risks related to
us and our market
Ongoing financial market volatility and adverse
developments in the global economic environment have had and
could continue to have a significant adverse impact on our
business, financial condition and operating results.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations have
been and could in the future be significantly negatively
impacted by general economic conditions and the related downturn
in the semiconductor market. The global economy has recently
experienced a significant downturn, reflecting the effects of
the credit market crisis, slower economic activity, a generally
negative economic outlook, and a decrease in consumer and
business confidence. A prolonged economic downturn would pose a
number of significant risks for Infineon, including:
|
|
|
|
|
significant declines in revenue;
|
|
|
|
significant reductions in selling prices;
|
|
|
|
increased volatility
and/or
declines in our share price;
|
|
|
|
increased volatility or adverse movements in foreign currency
exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
delays in, or curtailment of, purchasing decisions by our
customers or potential customers either as a result of overall
economic uncertainty or as a result of their inability to access
the liquidity necessary to engage in purchasing initiatives or
new product development;
|
|
|
|
increased credit risk associated with our customers or potential
customers, particularly those that may operate in industries
most affected by the economic downturn, such as automotives;
|
|
|
|
unprofitable operations;
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill or other long-lived assets; and
|
|
|
|
negative cash flows.
|
To the extent that the current economic downturn worsens or is
prolonged, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could continue to be significantly and adversely
affected.
If we are
unsuccessful in implementing our operational restructuring
plans, our revenues and profitability may be adversely
affected.
Our future success and financial performance are largely
dependent on our ability to successfully implement our business
strategy and achieve sustained profitability. In furtherance of
our overall strategy, we have restructured and are continuing to
restructure our operations to improve our focus on our main
business. These operational restructuring plans include the
implementation of our cost-reduction program IFX10+, which have
included the following primary measures:
|
|
|
|
|
product portfolio management to eliminate unprofitable or
insufficiently profitable product families and to increase
efficiency in R&D;
|
|
|
|
reduction of manufacturing costs and optimization of the value
chain;
|
|
|
|
improved efficiency of processes and tasks in the fields of
general and administrative expenses, R&D, and marketing and
sales; and
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
re-organization of our structure along our target
markets; and
|
|
|
|
reductions in workforce.
|
Any failure to continue to execute our strategy successfully,
including the execution of our cost reduction program
IFX10+, could have a material adverse effect on our
operations or financial performance.
The
semiconductor industry is characterized by intense competition,
which could reduce our revenues or put continued pressure on our
sales prices.
The semiconductor industry is highly competitive, and has been
characterized by rapid technological change, short product
lifecycles, high capital expenditures, intense pricing pressure
from major customers, periods of oversupply and continuous
advancements in process technologies and manufacturing
facilities. Increased competitive pressure or the relative
weakening of our competitive position could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We operate in
a highly cyclical industry and our business has in the past
suffered, is currently suffering and could again suffer from
periodic downturns.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has suffered
from significant economic downturns at various times. These
downturns have involved periods of production overcapacity,
oversupply, lower prices and lower revenues. In addition,
average selling prices for our products can fluctuate
significantly from quarter to quarter or month to month.
There can be no assurance that the markets in which we operate
will experience sustained growth in the near term, that the
growth rates experienced in past periods will be attainable
again in future years, or that we will be successful in managing
any future downturn or substantial decline in average selling
prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be
able to match our production capacity to demand.
It is difficult to predict future developments in the markets we
serve, making it hard to estimate requirements for production
capacity. If markets do not grow as we have anticipated, or
shrink faster than we have anticipated, we risk
under-utilization of our facilities or having insufficient
capacity to meet customer demand.
Market developments and industry overcapacity may lead to
under-utilization of our facilities, which may result in idle
capacity costs, write-offs of inventories and losses on products
due to falling average selling prices. Such a development could
potentially require us to undertake restructuring activities
that may involve significant charges to our results of
operations. In particular, semiconductor companies have added
significant capacity from time to time, including in recent
periods prior to the economic downturn. In the past, the net
increases of supply sometimes exceeded demand requirements,
leading to oversupply situations and downturns in the industry.
Downturns, such as the current downturn, have had a severe
negative effect on the profitability of the industry. Given the
volatility and competition in the semiconductor industry, we are
likely to face downturns again in the future, which would likely
have similar effects. Fluctuations in the rate at which industry
capacity grows relative to the growth rate in demand for
semiconductor products may in the future put pressure on our
average selling prices and negatively affect our results of
operations.
In addition, during periods of increased demand, we may not have
sufficient capacity to meet customer orders. In the past, we
have responded to increased demand by opening new production
facilities or entering into strategic alliances, which in many
cases resulted in significant expenditures. We have also
purchased an increasing number of processed wafers and packages
from semiconductor foundries and subcontractors to meet higher
levels of demand and have incurred higher costs of goods sold as
a result. To expand our production capacity in the future, we
may have to invest substantial amounts, which could negatively
affect our results of operations.
52
Our business
could suffer as a result of volatility in different parts of the
world.
We operate globally, with numerous development, manufacturing,
assembly and testing facilities on three continents, including
facilities that we operate jointly with partners. In the 2009
fiscal year, 82 percent of our revenues were generated
outside Germany and 64 percent were generated outside
Europe. Our business is therefore subject to risks involved in
international business, including:
|
|
|
|
|
negative economic developments in foreign economies and
instability of foreign governments, including the threat of war,
terrorist attacks, epidemic, pandemic or civil unrest;
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and policies affecting trade and
investment; and
|
|
|
|
varying practices of the regulatory, tax, judicial and
administrative bodies in the jurisdictions where we operate.
|
Substantial changes in any of these conditions could have an
adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Our
results of operations could also be hurt if demand for the
products made by our customers decreases due to adverse economic
conditions in any of the regions where they sell their own
products.
In difficult
market conditions, our high fixed costs adversely affect our
results.
In less favorable industry conditions, in addition to price
pressure, we are faced with a decline in the utilization rates
of our manufacturing facilities due to decreases in product
demand. Since the semiconductor industry is characterized by
high fixed costs, our ability to reduce our total costs in line
with revenue declines is limited. The costs associated with
excess capacity, particularly for our front-end fabrication
facilities (fabs), are charged directly to cost of
sales as idle capacity charges. We cannot guarantee that
difficult market conditions will not adversely affect the
capacity utilization of our fabs and, consequently, our future
gross profits.
The
competitive environment of the semiconductor industry has led to
industry consolidation, and we may face even more intense
competition from newly merged competitors.
The highly competitive environment of the semiconductor industry
and the high costs associated with manufacturing technologies
and developing marketable products have resulted in significant
consolidation in the industry and are likely to lead to further
consolidation in the future. Such consolidation can allow our
competitors to further benefit from economies of scale, enjoy
improved or more comprehensive product portfolios and increase
the size of their serviceable markets. In addition, we may
become a target for a company looking to improve its competitive
position. Any such corporate event could result in unpredictable
consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition. Consequently, our
competitive position may be adversely impacted by consolidation
among other industry participants, who may leverage increased
market share and economies of scale to improve their competitive
position.
We intend to
continue to engage in acquisitions, joint ventures and other
transactions that may complement or expand our business. We may
not be able to complete these transactions, and even if
executed, these transactions pose significant risks and could
have a negative effect on our operations.
Our future success may be dependent on opportunities to enter
into joint ventures and to buy other businesses or technologies
that could complement, enhance or expand our current business or
products or that might otherwise offer us growth opportunities
or gains in productivity. If we are unable to identify suitable
targets, our growth prospects may suffer, and we may not be able
to realize sufficient scale advantages to compete effectively in
all relevant markets. We may also face competition for desirable
targets from other companies in the semiconductor industry. Our
ability to acquire targets may also be limited by applicable
antitrust laws and other regulations in the United States, the
European Union and other jurisdictions in which we do business.
We may not be able to complete such transactions, for reasons
including, but not limited to, a failure to secure financing or
as a result of restrictive covenants in our debt
53
instruments. Any transactions that we are able to identify and
complete may involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the diversion of our managements attention from our
existing business to integrate the operations and personnel of
the acquired or combined business or joint venture;
|
|
|
|
possible negative impacts on our operating results during the
integration process; and
|
|
|
|
our possible inability to achieve the intended objectives of the
transaction.
|
We may be
unable to successfully integrate businesses we acquire and may
be required to record charges related to the goodwill or other
long-lived assets associated with the acquired
businesses.
We have acquired other companies, businesses and technologies
from time to time. We intend to continue to make acquisitions
of, and investments in, other companies. We face risks resulting
from the expansion of our operations through acquisitions,
including the risk that we might be unable to successfully
integrate new businesses or teams with our culture and
strategies on a timely basis or at all. We also cannot be
certain that we will be able to achieve the full scope of the
benefits we expect from a particular acquisition or investment.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations may
suffer if we fail to coordinate our resources effectively to
manage both our existing businesses and any businesses we
acquire.
We review the goodwill associated with our acquisitions for
impairment at least once a year. Changes in our expectations due
to changes in market developments which we cannot foresee have
in the past resulted in us writing off amounts associated with
the goodwill of acquired companies, and future changes may
require additional write-offs in future periods, which could
have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We may not be
able to protect our proprietary intellectual property and may be
accused of infringing the intellectual property rights of
others.
Our success depends on our ability to obtain patents, licenses
and other intellectual property rights covering our products and
our design and manufacturing processes. The process of seeking
patent protection can be long and expensive. Patents may not be
granted on currently pending or future applications or may not
be of sufficient scope or strength to provide us with meaningful
protection or commercial advantage. In addition, effective
copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may be
unavailable or limited in some countries, and our trade secrets
may be vulnerable to disclosure or misappropriation by
employees, contractors and other persons.
Competitors may also develop technologies that are protected by
patents and other intellectual property rights. These
technologies may therefore either be unavailable to us or be
made available to us only on unfavorable terms and conditions.
Litigation, which could require significant financial and
management resources, may be necessary to enforce our patents or
other intellectual property rights or to defend against claims
of infringement of intellectual property rights brought against
Infineon by others. Lawsuits may have a material adverse effect
on our business. We may be forced to stop producing
substantially all or some of our products or to license the
underlying technology upon economically unfavorable terms and
conditions or we may be required to pay damages for the prior
use of third-party intellectual property.
Our business
could suffer due to decreases in customer demand.
Our sales volume depends significantly on the market success of
our customers in developing and selling end-products that
incorporate our products. The fast pace of technological change,
difficulties in the execution of individual projects, general
economic conditions and other factors may limit the market
success of our customers, resulting in a decrease in the volume
of demand for our products and adversely affecting our results
of operations.
54
Due to the time needed to develop the final product for end
customers and the time until such products are ultimately
introduced to the market, we may face significant and sometimes
unpredictable delays between the implementation of our products
and volume ramp up. This may cause significant idle capacity
costs.
The loss of
one or more of our key customers may adversely affect our
business.
Historically, a significant portion of our revenue has come from
a relatively small number of customers and distributors. The
loss or financial failure of any significant customer or
distributor, or any reduction in orders by any of our key
customers or distributors, could materially and adversely affect
our business.
Fluctuations
in the mix of products sold may adversely affect our financial
results.
We achieve differing gross profits across our wide range of
products. Our financial results therefore depend in part on the
structure of our product portfolio. Fluctuations in the mix and
types of our products may also affect the extent to which we are
able to recover our fixed costs and investments that are
associated with a particular product, and as a result can
negatively impact our financial results.
If we fail to
successfully implement an optimum make-or-buy strategy, our
business could suffer from higher costs.
We intend to continue to invest in leading-edge process
technologies such as power, embedded flash and radio-frequency
technologies. At the same time, for complementary
metal-oxide-semiconductors, or CMOS, below 90-nanometers, we
plan to continue to share risks and expand our access to
leading-edge technology through long-term strategic partnerships
with other leading industry participants and by making more
extensive use of manufacturing at silicon foundries. However,
the decision to develop our own solutions or to cooperate with
third-party suppliers could adversely affect our results of
operations if we fail to achieve sufficient volume production,
if market conditions for the services we obtain from foundries
become more expensive due to increases in worldwide demand for
foundry services, or if strategic partners fail to perform
properly.
Our business
could suffer from problems with manufacturing.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by the introduction
of new or enhanced products with short life cycles in a rapidly
changing technological environment. We manufacture our products
using processes that are highly complex, require advanced and
costly equipment and must continuously be modified to improve
yields and performance. Difficulties in the manufacturing
process can reduce yields or interrupt production, especially
during rapid ramp up periods, and as a result of such problems
we may on occasion not be able to deliver products on time or in
a cost-effective, competitive manner.
We cannot foresee and prepare for every contingency. If
production at a fabrication facility is interrupted, we may not
be able to shift production to other facilities on a timely
basis or customers may purchase products from other suppliers.
In either case, the loss of revenues and damage to the
relationship with our customers could be significant. Increasing
production capacity to reduce exposure to potential production
interruptions would increase our fixed costs. If demand for our
products does not increase proportionally to the increase in
production capacity, our operating results could be harmed.
If our outside
foundry suppliers fail to meet our expectations, our results of
operations and our ability to exploit growth opportunities could
be adversely affected.
We outsource production of some of our products to third-party
suppliers, including semiconductor foundry manufacturers and
assembly and test facilities, and expect that our reliance on
outsourcing will increase. If our outside suppliers are unable
to satisfy our demand, or experience manufacturing difficulties,
delays or reduced yields, our results of operations and ability
to satisfy customer demand could suffer. In addition, purchasing
rather than manufacturing these products may adversely affect
our gross profit margin if the purchase costs of these products
are higher than our own manufacturing costs. Our
55
internal manufacturing costs include depreciation and other
fixed costs, while costs for products outsourced are based in
large part on market conditions. Prices for foundry products
also vary depending on capacity utilization rates at our
suppliers, quantities demanded, product technology and geometry.
Furthermore, these outsourcing costs can vary materially from
quarter to quarter and, in cases of industry shortages, they can
increase significantly, negatively impacting our results of
operations.
Products that
do not meet customer specifications or that contain, or are
perceived to contain, defects or errors or that are otherwise
incompatible with their intended end use could impose
significant costs on us.
The design and production processes for our products are highly
complex. It is possible that we may produce products that do not
meet customer specifications, contain or are perceived to
contain defects or errors, or are otherwise incompatible with
their intended uses. We may incur substantial costs in remedying
such defects or errors, which could include material inventory
write-downs. Moreover, if actual or perceived problems with
nonconforming, defective or incompatible products occur after we
have shipped the products, we might not only bear direct
liability for providing replacements or otherwise compensating
customers, but could also suffer from long-term damage to our
relationship with important customers or to our reputation in
the industry generally. This could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We may be
adversely affected by property loss and business
interruption.
Damage and loss caused by fire, natural hazards, supply
shortage, or other disturbance at semiconductor facilities or
within our supply chain at customers as well as at
suppliers can be severe. Thus, even though we have
constructed and operate our facilities in ways that minimize the
specific risks and that enable a quick response if such event
should occur, damages from such events could nonetheless be
severe. Furthermore, despite our continued expectations to
invest in prevention and response measures at our facilities and
to maintain property loss and business interruption insurance,
any loss may exceed the amounts recoverable under our insurance
policies. As a result, any such events could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations, and any such loss may exceed the amounts
recoverable under our insurance policies.
Our business
could suffer if we are not able to secure the development of new
technologies or if we cannot keep pace with the technology
development of our competitors.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid
technological changes. New process technologies using smaller
feature sizes and offering better performance characteristics
are introduced every one to two years. The introduction of new
technologies allows us to increase the functions per chip while
at the same time improving performance parameters, such as
decreasing power consumption or increasing processing speed. In
addition, the reduction of feature sizes allows us to produce
smaller chips offering the same functionality and thereby
considerably reduce the costs per function. In order to remain
competitive, it is essential that we secure the capabilities to
develop and qualify new technologies for the manufacturing of
new products. If we are unable to develop and qualify new
technologies and products, or if we devote resources to the
pursuit of technologies or products that fail to be accepted in
the marketplace or that fail to be commercially viable, our
business may suffer.
We rely on
strategic partners and other third parties, and our business
could be harmed if they fail to perform as expected or
relationships with them were to be terminated.
As part of our strategy, we have entered into a number of
long-term strategic alliances with leading industry
participants, both to manufacture semiconductors and to develop
new manufacturing process technologies and products. If our
strategic partners encounter financial difficulty or change
their business strategies, they may no longer be able or willing
to participate in these alliances. Some of the agreements
governing our strategic alliances allow our partners to
terminate the agreement if our equity ownership changes so that
a third party gains control of Infineon or of a significant
portion of our shares. Our business
56
could be harmed if any of our strategic partners were to
discontinue our participation in a strategic alliance or if the
alliance were otherwise terminated. To the extent we rely on
alliances and third-party design
and/or
manufacturing relationships, we face the risks of:
|
|
|
|
|
reduced control over delivery schedules and product costs;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing costs that are higher than anticipated;
|
|
|
|
the inability of our manufacturing partners to develop
manufacturing methods appropriate for our products and their
unwillingness to devote adequate capacity to produce our
products;
|
|
|
|
a decline in product reliability;
|
|
|
|
an inability to maintain continuing relationships with our
suppliers; and
|
|
|
|
limited ability to meet customer demand when faced with product
shortages.
|
If any of these risks materialize, we could experience an
interruption in our supply chain or an increase in costs, which
could delay or decrease our revenues or adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
New business
is often subject to a competitive selection process that can be
lengthy and uncertain and that requires us to incur significant
expenses in advance. Even if we win and begin a product design,
a customer may decide to cancel or change our product plans,
which could cause us to generate no sales from a product and
adversely affect our results of operations.
In several of our business areas, we focus on winning
competitive bid selection processes, known as design
wins, to develop products for use in our customers
products. These selection processes can be lengthy and can
require us to incur significant design and development
expenditures. We may not win the competitive selection process
and may never generate any revenues despite incurring
significant design and development expenditures.
If we win a product design and receive corresponding orders from
our customers, we may experience delays in generating revenues
from our products as a result of the lengthy development and
design cycle. In addition, a delay or cancellation of a
customers plans could significantly adversely affect our
financial results, as we may have incurred significant expenses
and generated no revenues. Finally, if our customers fail to
successfully market and sell their products, our results of
operations could be materially adversely affected as the demand
for our products falls.
We rely on a
limited number of suppliers of manufacturing equipment and
materials and could suffer shortages if these suppliers were to
interrupt supply or increase their prices.
Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining deliveries of
equipment and adequate supplies of materials on a timely basis.
We purchase equipment and materials from a number of suppliers
on a
just-in-time
basis. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit
supply to us or increase prices due to capacity constraints or
other factors. Because the equipment that we purchase is
complex, it is difficult for us to substitute one supplier for
another or one piece of equipment for another. Some materials
are only available from a limited number of suppliers. Although
we believe that supplies of the materials we use are currently
adequate, shortages could occur in critical materials, such as
silicon wafers or specialized chemicals used in production, due
to interruption of supply or increased industry demand. Our
results of operations would be hurt if we were not able to
obtain adequate supplies of quality equipment or materials in a
timely manner or if there were significant increases in the
costs of equipment or materials.
57
We may be
adversely affected by rising raw material prices.
We are exposed to fluctuations in raw material prices. In the
recent past, gold, copper and petroleum-based organic polymer
prices in particular have fluctuated on a worldwide basis. If we
are not able to compensate for or pass on our increased costs to
customers, such price increases could have a material adverse
impact on our financial results.
Our business
could suffer if we are unable to secure dependable power
supplies at reasonable cost.
Our business requires reliable electrical power at reasonable
cost and may be adversely affected by power shortages due to
disruptions in supply, as well as by increases in market prices
for fuel or electricity.
Our operations
rely on complex information technology systems and networks, and
any disruptions in such systems or networks could have a
material adverse impact on our business and results of
operations.
We rely heavily on information technology systems and networks
to support business processes as well as internal and external
communications. These systems and networks are potentially
vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources.
However, despite precautions taken by us to manage our risks
related to system and network disruptions, including the use of
multiple suppliers, an extended outage in a telecommunications
network utilized by our systems or a similar event could lead to
an extended unanticipated interruption of our systems or
networks, which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Furthermore, any data leaks resulting from information
technology security breaches despite use of sophisticated
information technology security to protect our highly
confidential information could adversely affect our business
operations or reputation.
We have
recorded significant reorganization and impairment charges in
the past and may do so again in the future, which could
materially adversely affect our business.
In the past, we have recorded restructuring and asset impairment
charges relating to our efforts to consolidate and refocus our
business. As we respond to continuing rapid change in the
semiconductor industry in order to remain competitive, we may
incur additional employee termination, restructuring and asset
impairment charges in the future.
In addition, we test our long-lived assets, including intangible
assets, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that our carrying value may not be recoverable. We
believe that the substantial decrease in our market value in
recent periods was largely due to factors which do not impact
the fair value of our cash generating units to the same extent,
and therefore concluded that long-lived assets were not impaired
as of such date. We will continue to review our long-lived
assets for potential impairment, and may in the future be
required to record charges in that regard.
Charges related to employee termination, restructuring and asset
impairments may have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations, especially in the
periods in which such charges are recorded.
Our business
could suffer if third-party service providers fail to perform as
expected.
We have outsourced a number of business functions and processes,
including some of our IT services, and therefore are subject to
risks customarily encountered in outsourcing arrangements. For
example, if a service provider is not able to provide the agreed
services at the level of quality we require, we may not be able
to replace such service provider on short notice, which may have
an adverse effect on our business.
58
Our success
depends on our ability to recruit and retain sufficient
qualified key personnel.
Our success depends significantly on the recruitment and
retention of highly skilled personnel, particularly in the areas
of R&D, marketing, production management and general
management. The competition for such highly skilled employees is
intense and the loss of the services of key personnel without
adequate replacement or the inability to attract new qualified
personnel could have a material adverse effect on Infineon. We
can provide no assurance that we will be able to successfully
retain
and/or
recruit the key personnel we require.
Reductions in
government subsidies or demands for repayment of such subsidies
could increase our reported expenses or limit our ability to
fund capital expenditures.
Our reported expenses have been reduced in recent years by
various subsidies received from governmental entities. In
particular, we have received, and expect to continue to receive,
subsidies for investment projects as well as for R&D
projects. We recognized governmental subsidies as a reduction of
R&D expenses and cost of sales in an aggregate amount
of 106 million in the 2007 fiscal
year, 78 million in the 2008 fiscal year
and 66 million in the 2009 fiscal year.
As the general availability of government funding is outside our
control, we can provide no assurance that we will continue to
benefit from such support, that sufficient alternative funding
would be available if necessary or that any such alternative
funding would be provided on terms as favorable to us as those
we currently receive. In addition, if certain conditions are not
met or certain events occur, we may have to repay the government
subsidies that we have already received.
The application for and implementation of such subsidies often
involves compliance with extensive regulatory requirements,
including, in the case of subsidies to be granted within the
European Union, notification to the European Commission of the
contemplated grant prior to disbursement. In particular,
establishment of compliance with project-related ceilings on
aggregate subsidies defined under European Union law often
involves highly complex economic evaluations. If we fail to meet
applicable requirements, we may not be able to receive the
relevant subsidies or may be obliged to repay current or future
subsidies, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
The terms of certain of the subsidies we have received impose
conditions that may limit our flexibility to utilize subsidized
facilities as we deem appropriate, to move equipment to other
facilities, to reduce employment at the site, or to use related
intellectual property outside the European Union. This could
impair our ability to operate our business in the manner we
believe to be most cost effective.
Our operating
results fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and as
a result we may fail to meet the expectations of securities
analysts and investors, which could cause our stock price to
decline.
Our operating results have fluctuated significantly from quarter
to quarter in the past and are likely to continue to do so due
to a number of factors, many of which are not within our
control. If our operating results do not meet the expectations
of securities analysts or investors, the market price of our
shares will likely decline. Our reported results can be affected
by numerous factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the overall cyclicality of, and changing economic and market
conditions in, the semiconductor industry, as well as
seasonality in sales of consumer products in which our products
are incorporated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to scale our operations in response to changes in
demand for our existing products and services or demand for new
products requested by our customers;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property disputes, customer indemnification claims
and other types of litigation risks;
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of a key customer, design win or order;
|
|
|
|
the timing, rescheduling or cancellation of significant customer
orders and our ability, as well as the ability of our customers,
to manage inventory;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting rules;
|
|
|
|
our success in implementing cost reductions measures;
|
|
|
|
the length of particular product development cycles; and
|
|
|
|
liabilities arising as a result of Qimondas insolvency.
|
Due to the foregoing factors and the other risks discussed in
this annual report, investors should not rely on
quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results as an
indicator of future performance.
Our results of
operations and financial condition can be adversely impacted by
changes in exchange rates.
Our results of operations can be negatively affected by changes
in exchange rates, particularly between the Euro and the
U.S. dollar or the Japanese yen. In addition, the balance
sheet impact of currency translation adjustments has been, and
may continue to be, material. Furthermore, while we operate in
an industry with prices primarily denominated in
U.S. dollars and therefore receive a large proportion of
our revenues in U.S. dollars, a large proportion of our
expenses are in Euro; and we also report our financial results
in Euro, which is our operational currency. As a result, our
financial results can be significantly negatively affected by
exchange rate fluctuations of the U.S. dollar against the
Euro. See Operating and Financial Review
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risks.
If we fail to
maintain effective internal controls, we may not be able to
report financial results accurately or on a timely basis, or to
detect fraud, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business or share price.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide
reasonable assurance with respect to our financial reports and
to effectively prevent financial fraud. Pursuant to the Sarbanes
Oxley Act, we are required to periodically evaluate the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal
controls. Internal controls over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements because of inherent limitations,
including the possibility of human error or collusion, the
circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. If we fail to
maintain an effective system of internal controls, our business
and operating results could be harmed, and we could fail to meet
our reporting obligations, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business and our share price.
We are exposed
to various tax risks, and several factors could have an adverse
effect on our tax burden.
Our German and foreign tax returns are periodically examined by
tax authorities, and several entities of the consolidated group
are currently subject to such an examination. The most recent
finalized corporate income, trade and sales tax audit of
Infineon and our German subsidiaries covered the 1999 through
2001 fiscal years; for the 2002 through 2005 fiscal years a tax
audit has started. Given the considerable amount of available
tax losses incurred by us, additional tax assessments at
Infineon level should not trigger substantial tax charges, if
any. We regularly assess the adequacy of our domestic and
foreign tax provisions in light of new evidence and make
adjustments to the extent necessary. Due to the complexities in
tax laws and their interpretation by the tax authorities there
can be no assurance that the outcome of German and foreign tax
audits will not differ from these estimates, and therefore,
additional tax charges imposed by the tax authorities may exceed
taxes accrued as liabilities or provisions and may require
additional liquidity.
In case of changes in the shareholder structure of Infineon,
there is a risk that our tax losses, tax loss carry-forwards and
interest carry-forwards may be eliminated entirely or in part.
Such elimination in whole or in part may, in particular, result
from a direct or indirect acquisition of shares (e.g.,
acquisition or capital increase) of more than 50 percent or
of more than 25 percent up to 50 percent,
respectively, by an individual shareholder, a related party, or
a defined group of shareholders within a five-year period (see
Section 8c of the German Corporate Income Tax Act
(Körperschaftsteuergesetz)). Such elimination of the
60
tax loss carry-forwards could have a non-cash effect in our
consolidated financial statements as a consequence of the
derecognition of deferred tax assets relating to those tax loss
carry-forwards. In addition, the tax burden in Germany for
future tax assessment periods could increase as respective tax
losses, tax loss carry-forwards or interest carry-forwards may
no longer be available to offset future taxable income.
Furthermore, future changes of the tax laws in Germany or other
jurisdictions relevant for us could increase our tax burden. Any
such changes, as well as the above mentioned risks, could have a
material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our deferred
tax assets are subject to regular reassessment, which may result
in additional valuation allowances.
We recognized deferred tax assets in a total amount
of 396 million as of September 30, 2009. We
evaluate our deferred tax asset position and the need for a
valuation allowance on a regular basis. The assessment requires
the exercise of judgment on the part of our management with
respect to, among other things, benefits that could be realized
from available tax strategies and future taxable income, as well
as other positive and negative factors. The ultimate realization
of deferred tax assets is dependent upon, among other things,
our ability to generate the appropriate character of future
taxable income sufficient to utilize loss carry-forwards or tax
credits before their expiration. The recorded amount of total
deferred tax assets could be reduced, resulting in a decrease in
our total assets and consequently in our shareholders
equity, if our estimates of projected future taxable income and
benefits from available tax strategies are lowered as a result
of a change in managements assessment or due to other
factors, or if changes in current tax regulations are enacted
that impose restrictions on the timing or extent of our ability
to utilize tax loss and credit carry-forwards in the future. A
change of the estimated amounts and character of future income
may require additional valuation allowances.
Environmental
laws and regulations may expose us to liability and increase our
costs.
Our operations are subject to many environmental laws and
regulations wherever we operate, governing, among other things,
air and noise emissions, wastewater discharges, the use and
handling of hazardous substances, waste disposal and the
investigation and remediation of soil and ground water
contamination.
An EU Directive imposes a take-back obligation on
manufacturers to finance the collection, recovery and disposal
of electrical and electronic equipment. Because of unclear
statutory definitions and interpretations in individual member
states, as well as ongoing discussions on national implementing
measures, we are unable at this time to determine in detail the
consequences of this directive for us. Additional European
legislation restricts the use of lead and other hazardous
substances in electrical and electronic equipment from July
2006. Both Directives are under revision and their possible
impacts currently cannot be determined in detail. A further EU
Directive restricts the use of hazardous substances in
automotive vehicles. Because the Directive has been changed and
further revision is foreseen, the future impact on Infineon
cannot currently be determined in detail.
Another Directive describes eco-design requirements for
energy-using products, including information requirements for
components and sub-assemblies. Furthermore the European
regulatory framework for chemicals, called REACH, deals with the
registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of
chemicals. This legislation may complicate our R&D
activities and may require us to change certain of our
manufacturing processes to utilize more costly materials or to
incur substantial additional costs. In addition, pursuant to the
EU Directive on environmental liability with regard to the
prevention and remedying of environmental damage, we could face
increased environmental liability, which may result in higher
costs and potential damage claims.
In addition, the Chinese government restricts the use of lead
and other hazardous substances in electronic products. Because
neither all implementing measures nor the key product catalogue
are in place, the consequences for Infineon cannot currently be
determined in detail. Similar regulations or
61
substance bans are being proposed or implemented in various
countries of the world. We are not able at this time to estimate
the amount of additional costs that we may incur in connection
with these regulations.
There is a risk that we may become the subject of environmental,
health or safety liabilities or litigation. Environmental,
health, and safety claims or the failure to comply with current
or future regulations could result in the assessment of damages
or imposition of fines against us, suspension of production or a
cessation of operations. Significant financial reserves or
additional compliance expenditures could be required in the
future due to changes in law or new information regarding
environmental conditions or other events, and those expenditures
could adversely affect our business or financial condition. As
with other companies engaged in similar activities, we face
inherent risks of environmental liability in our current and
historical manufacturing locations. Costs associated with future
additional environmental compliance or remediation obligations
could adversely affect our business.
We may face
significant liabilities as a result of the insolvency of
Qimonda.
As a result of the commencement of insolvency proceedings by
Qimonda, we are exposed to potential liabilities arising in
connection with the Qimonda business. Such potential liabilities
include, among others, pending antitrust and securities law
claims, potential liabilities arising from our former
participation in Qimonda Dresden, potential claims for repayment
of governmental subsidies, claims by former employees of Qimonda
and other employee-related contingencies.
In addition, we may be subject to claims by the insolvency
administrator under German insolvency laws for repayment of
certain amounts received by us from Qimonda, such as payments
for intra-group services and supplies, during defined periods
prior to the commencement of insolvency proceedings. Depending
on future developments in Qimondas operations in Portugal,
there is also a risk that claims could be made against us in
connection with governmental subsidiaries received by Qimonda
Portugal S.A. prior to the carve-out. The insolvency of Qimonda
may also subject us to other claims arising in connection with
the contracts, offers, uncompleted transactions, continuing
obligations, risks, encumbrances and other liabilities
contributed to Qimonda in connection with the carve-out of the
Qimonda business, as we expect that Qimonda will not be able to
fulfill its obligation to indemnify us against any such
liabilities.
Furthermore, we may lose rights and licenses to Qimondas
intellectual property that we are entitled to under the
contribution agreement between us and Qimonda due the fact that
the insolvency administrator has declared non-performance of
this agreement. We are evaluating the scope of any potentially
affected intellectual property, and we are unable to provide any
reasonable estimate of any potential related costs to us.
As of September 30, 2009, we recorded aggregate liabilities
of 21 million and provisions of
163 million in connection with these matters. The
provisions reflect the amount of those liabilities that
management believes are probable and can be estimated with
reasonable accuracy at that time. There can be no assurance that
such provisions and allowances recorded will be sufficient to
cover all liabilities that may ultimately be incurred in
relation to these matters.
Finally, there can be no assurance that the insolvency
administrator or creditors of Qimonda will not seek to recover
money from us by asserting claims that we cannot currently
foresee. Even if a court were to dismiss or otherwise rule
against such claims, defending against them could require us to
expend significant time, money and management attention.
A sale or
closure of the ALTIS facility may result in us incurring
material additional costs and charges.
We and our joint venture partner IBM are currently involved in
ongoing negotiations with strategic and financial partners
regarding a divestiture of our respective shares in ALTIS, a
manufacturing joint venture in France. The outcome of these
negotiations cannot be predicted at this stage. In the event of
a failure to reach an agreement with the potential buyers, we
will have to reassess all options. All currently
62
conceivable scenarios may result in our company incurring
material additional costs and charges. In the event of a sale,
we may incur, among others, expenses under a wafer supply
agreement that is to be concluded between the joint venture
partners and the potential buyer. In the event of a closure, we
and IBM may incur material expenses relating to the closing.
Although the exact amount of any such expenses cannot be
reliably assessed as yet, such expenses could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
position.
Our business
and financial condition could be adversely affected by current
or future litigation.
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business,
including suits involving allegations of intellectual property
infringement, product liability and breaches of contract. The
results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict.
There can be no assurance that the results of current or future
legal proceedings will not materially harm our business,
reputation or brand.
We record a provision for litigation risks when it is probable
that a liability has been incurred and the associated amount can
be reasonably estimated. We maintain liability insurance for
certain legal risks at levels our management believes are
appropriate and consistent with industry practice. We may incur
losses relating to litigation beyond the limits, or outside the
coverage, of such insurance and such losses may have a material
adverse effect on the results of our operations or financial
condition, and our provisions for litigation-related losses may
not be sufficient to cover our ultimate loss or expenditure. An
unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or
financial condition.
We are a
subject of investigations in several jurisdictions in connection
with pricing practices in the Dynamic Random Access Memory
(DRAM) industry, and are a defendant in civil
antitrust claims in connection with these matters.
In September 2004, we entered into a plea agreement with the
Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the
DOJ) in connection with its investigation of alleged
antitrust violations in the DRAM industry. Pursuant to this plea
agreement, we agreed to plead guilty to a single count relating
to the price fixing of DRAM products and to pay a fine of
$160 million, payable in equal annual installments through
2009. The last installment was paid in October 2009.
Subsequent to the commencement of the DOJ investigation, a
number of purported class action lawsuits were filed against us
and other DRAM suppliers in U.S. federal courts and in
state courts in various U.S. states and Canadian provinces.
The complaints allege violations of U.S. federal and state
or Canadian antitrust and competition laws and seek treble
damages in unspecified amounts, costs, attorneys fees and
an injunction against the allegedly unlawful conduct on behalf
of the plaintiffs. In July 2006, the state attorney generals of
a number of U.S. states and territories filed actions
against us and other DRAM suppliers in U.S. federal courts.
The claims involve allegations of DRAM price fixing and
artificial price inflation and seek to recover three times
actual damages and other relief.
In April 2003, we received a request for information from the
European Commission in connection with alleged anti-competitive
practices in the European market for DRAM products. The European
Commission opened formal proceedings in February 2009. We are
cooperating with the European Commission in its investigation.
Qimonda is obligated to indemnify us for any liabilities arising
from the claims and proceedings described above. Due to
Qimondas recent insolvency filing, however, we expect that
Qimonda will not be able to indemnify us against any such
potential liabilities.
In May 2004, we received a notice of a formal inquiry into
alleged DRAM industry competition law violations from the
Canadian Competition Bureau. We are cooperating with the
Canadian Competition Bureau in its inquiry.
63
An adverse final resolution of the matters described above could
result in significant financial liability to, and other adverse
effects upon, us which would have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Irrespective of the validity or the successful assertion of the
above-referenced claims, we could incur significant costs with
respect to defending against or settling such claims, which
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition and cash flow. For further
detail, see note 38 to our consolidated financial statements.
Purported
class action lawsuits have been filed against us alleging
securities fraud.
Following our announcement in September 2004 of our agreement to
plead guilty in connection with the DOJs antitrust
investigation and to pay a fine of $160 million, several
purported securities class action lawsuits have been brought
against us in U.S. district courts. The lawsuits were
consolidated into one complaint that is pending at the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. Plaintiffs allege violations of the
U.S. securities laws and assert that we made materially
false and misleading public statements about our historical and
projected financial results and competitive position and
manipulated the price of our securities, thereby injuring our
shareholders. These matters are currently subject to mediation.
Although we are defending against these suits vigorously, a
significant settlement or negative outcome at trial could have a
material adverse effect on our financial results.
We are the
subject of an investigation by the European Commission in
connection with alleged violations of competition laws in the
Chip Card & Security segment.
In October 2008, we learned that the European Commission had
commenced an investigation involving our Chip Card &
Security segment for alleged violations of competition laws. In
September and October 2009, we and our French subsidiary
received written requests for information from the European
Commission. If the European Commission were to find that our
Chip Card & Security segment violated European Union
competition laws, the fines and penalties that would likely be
imposed on us could be substantial and would be expected to have
a material adverse effect on our business, operations and
financial condition.
We might be
faced with product liability or warranty claims.
Despite our current efforts, defects may occur in our products.
The occurrence of defects, particularly in consumer areas and
areas in which personal injury could result, such as our
automotive business, could give rise to warranty claims or to
liability for damages caused by such defects. We could also
incur consequential damages and experience limited acceptance of
our products in the market. In addition, customers have from
time to time notified us of potential contractual warranty
claims in respect of products that we supplied, and are likely
to do so in the future. These matters could have a material
adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Risk related to
our shares
Our share
price is subject to significant fluctuations.
The price of our shares could vary considerably, especially
because of fluctuations in actual or forecast results of
operations, changes in profit forecasts or the non-fulfillment
of securities analysts profit expectations, changes in
general economic conditions, or other factors. The general
volatility of share prices, which has increased considerably
over the course of the worsening credit crisis in the financial
markets in 2008 and 2009, could also put pressure on the price
of our shares without this being directly related to our
business activities, cash flow, financial condition, results of
operations, or business outlook. Furthermore, the possibility
exists that hedge funds having short-term investment goals have
already acquired, or will acquire, large blocks of shares, which
would enable such funds to deliberately affect our share price.
64
BUSINESS
Overview
We are one of the worlds leading semiconductor suppliers
by revenue. We have been at the forefront of the development,
manufacture and marketing of semiconductors for more than
50 years, first as the Siemens Semiconductor Group and
then, from 1999, as an independent group. Infineon Technologies
AG has been a publicly traded company since March 2000.
According to the market research company iSuppli (August 2009),
we were ranked the number 10 semiconductor company in the world
by revenue in the first six months of the 2009 calendar year.
We design, develop, manufacture and market a broad range of
semiconductors and complete system solutions used in a wide
variety of applications for energy efficiency, security and
communications. Our main business is currently conducted through
our four operating segments: Automotive, Industrial &
Multimarket, Chip Card & Security and Wireless
Solutions. On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset
purchase agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business,
and such sale closed on November 6, 2009.
In the 2009 fiscal year, we took significant measures, in
particular through our capital increase in August 2009 and
our cost-reduction program IFX10+, with the aim of cutting
costs, reducing debt, preserving cash and otherwise improving
our financial condition. The efforts continue at present. We
believe that due to the positive impact of our overall cost
reduction and cash preservation measures to retain liquidity we
will be able to finance our normal business operations out of
cash flows from continuing operations despite the sharp decline
in revenue levels.
The address of our principal executive offices is: Am Campeon
1-12, D-85579, Neubiberg, Germany, and our main telephone number
is +49-89-234-0. Our agent in the United States is Infineon
Technologies North America Corp., which has its principal
executive offices at 640 N. McCarthy Blvd., Milpitas,
CA 95035.
The principal developments during the 2009 fiscal year included
the following:
Corporate and
Commercial Developments
|
|
|
|
|
On July 16, 2009, we launched a rights issue for up to
337 million shares with a subscription price
of 2.15 per share. On August 5 and August 11,
2009, we completed the rights issue and issued approximately
323 million shares to our then existing shareholders and
approximately 14 million new shares, representing
approximately 1.3 percent of our total share capital, to a
financial investor, respectively. The capital increase raised
approximately 725 million in gross proceeds.
|
|
|
|
On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business to
Lantiq, affiliates of Golden Gate Private Equity Inc. The
majority of the purchase price was paid at closing on
November 6, 2009 in the amount of 223 million,
with up to an additional 20 million of the
purchase price being payable 9 months after the closing
date. We sold the Wireline Communications business in order to
focus on the further development of our main business, our
strategy and strong position in the key areas of energy
efficiency, security and communications, while at the same time
further improving our balance sheet and strengthening our
liquidity position.
|
|
|
|
On May 26, 2009, we, through our subsidiary, Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., issued a nominal amount
of 196 million guaranteed subordinated
convertible notes due 2014 at a discount of 7.2 percent.
|
|
|
|
In the 2009 fiscal year, we repurchased and redeemed a total
of 215 million in nominal amount of our
guaranteed subordinated exchangeable notes due 2010 that were
issued by our subsidiary Infineon Technologies Investment B.V.
and 152 million in nominal amount of our
guaranteed subordinated convertible notes due 2010 that were
issued by our subsidiary Infineon Technologies
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
Holding B.V. for an aggregate of 285 million in
cash, including transaction costs of 3 million.
All notes repurchased were subsequently cancelled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 29, 2009, we redeemed the remaining
outstanding balance of a nominal amount of
19.35 million of our subordinated exchangeable notes
due 2010 at par.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2009, we voluntarily delisted our ADSs from the New
York Stock Exchange and our ADSs began trading over-the-counter
on the OTCQX International market.
|
|
|
|
On January 23, 2009, Qimonda filed for insolvency and
formal insolvency proceedings were opened in the local registry
court in Munich on April 1, 2009. Infineon deconsolidated
Qimonda during the second quarter of the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We, together with 17 European partner companies, formed the
technology consortium SmartPM (Smart Power Management in Home
and Health) to significantly increase the energy efficiency of
home appliances, power supplies and healthcare and medical
equipment by 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We, BMW Forschung und Technik GmbH, Continental AG, Daimler AG
and Bosch had formed the Radar on Chip for Cars
(RoCC) technology cooperation project. The aim of the three-year
project is to significantly increase driving safety by making
highly reliable radar systems available in all vehicle classes.
|
|
|
|
The Hirose plant of the car manufacturer Toyota awarded us the
Best of Excellent Quality Award 2009 for our
extraordinary product quality. This is the first time that a
non-Japanese company was honored with such an award and we are
the only recipient of the award in 2009.
|
|
|
|
We and Nokia entered into a collaboration for Enhanced Data rate
for GSM Evolution (EDGE) technology. We will supply
our
XMMtm
2130 EDGE platform to Nokia, enabling the mobile device
manufacturer to bring a new breed of internet capable devices to
the market.
|
|
|
|
We signed a collaboration contract with Bosch under which we
will license to Bosch certain manufacturing processes for power
semiconductors. Additionally, the contract includes a
second-source agreement. In addition to Boschs own
semiconductor manufacturing in Reutlingen, we will produce
components developed on the basis of these processes and will
supply Bosch with these components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We announced that we had sold more than 100 million of our
chips for entry-level handset models, often referred to as
Ultra Low Cost telephones. The
X-GOLDtm
101
(E-GOLDtmvoice)
mobile communications chip is the second generation of our
highly integrated baseband chips for GSM/GPRS handsets. We also
unveiled our third-generation ultra-low-cost (ULC) mobile
communications chip, the new
X-GOLDtm
110.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We announced that Bosch will use a chip from our
RASICtm
(Radar System IC) product family in its new LRR3 radar
sensor system (third-generation Long Range Radar).
|
|
|
|
We announced that our 16-bit security microcontroller family SLE
78 was selected as the winner of the 2008 Sesame Award in the
category of Best Hardware.
|
|
|
|
We announced a strategic technology collaboration with Micron
for the development of high-density subscriber identity module
(HD-SIM) cards with storage capacities above 128 megabytes.
HD-SIMs are ideal for delivering expanded storage and greater
services while improving the operators processes.
|
|
|
|
Autoliv the worlds largest supplier of
automotive safety systems selected us as the sole
supplier of power semiconductors for its next-generation
seatbelt pretension systems, called Active Seatbelts.
Autolivs Active Seatbelts use a small motor device
containing the Infineon
NovalithICtm
power chip, which enables additional safety and comfort features
in cars.
|
66
Technical and
Product Developments
|
|
|
|
|
We expanded our application kit portfolio to simplify and
accelerate the design of energy-efficient motor drives based on
our 8-bit and 16-bit microcontrollers. The new kits are built
around members of our 8-bit XC800 and 16-bit XE166 family
supporting advanced motor control techniques like Field Oriented
Control (FOC) and Power Factor Control (PFC).
|
|
|
|
We expanded our product portfolio for automotive infotainment
applications by introducing a single-chip linear voltage
regulator with integrated diagnosis and car radio system
protection functions. The integration of the functions improves
the reliability of car radios.
|
|
|
|
We launched the next-generation 600V
CoolMOStm
C6 series of high-performance MOSFETs (metal-oxide semiconductor
field-effect transistors). With the 600V
CoolMOStm
C6 series, energy conversion applications such as Power Factor
Correction (PFC) or Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) stages can be
made significantly more energy efficient.
|
|
|
|
We introduced our new lamp ballast controller that integrates
Power Factor Correction (PFC), lamp controller, and high-voltage
half-bridge driver functions into a single, compact,
surface-mounted package. Typical applications for the ICB2FL01G
product are electronic ballasts for compact fluorescent lamps,
linear fluorescent T5 and T8 lamps, dimmable fluorescent lamps
and emergency lighting.
|
|
|
|
We announced production availability of our
OptiMOStm
3 75V power MOSFET family for energy efficient power conversion
applications. The new devices feature industry leading on-state
resistance and Figure of Merit (FOM) characteristics.
|
|
|
|
We launched the worlds smallest transient voltage
suppression (TVS) diode for the protection of antennas in the
latest electronic equipment. Applications include GPS, mobile
TV, FM radio, and Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) and Tire Pressure
Monitoring Systems (TPMS) in vehicles.
|
|
|
|
We announced the further expansion of our RFID (Radio Frequency
Identification) product portfolio. Our new RFID chip PJM
Light (Phase Jitter Modulation) provides a memory capacity
of one kilobit and privacy features designed to prevent
unauthorized access to the protected data.
|
|
|
|
We introduced two new RF-chips for LTE (Long-Term-Evolution) and
3G. The
SMARTitm
LU is a single-chip 65nm CMOS RF transceiver providing 2G/3G/LTE
functionality with a DigRF digital baseband interface for data
rates of up to 150 Mbps in LTE Networks. The
SMARTitm
UEmicro is optimized for low-cost 3G designs.
|
|
|
|
We and Seiko Epson Corporation developed the next generation of
advanced global positioning system (GPS) technology. The new GPS
single-chip design, the
XPOSYStm,
is optimized for mobile devices for the consumer market;
especially cellular phones with GPS navigation.
|
|
|
|
We presented our latest single-chip VDSL/ADSL solutions for next
generation telecom networks. The
XWAYtm
xRX200 family offers high integration, with a more than
50 percent smaller footprint compared to existing
solutions, and
best-in-class
energy efficiency, with more than 50 percent lower power
consumption compared to similar single-chip solutions.
|
|
|
|
We introduced a new family of single-chip WLAN integrated
circuits (ICs). The new
XWAYtm
WAVE100 ICs provide a high-performance and cost-effective
solution for wireless network access points that are compliant
with the 802.11n draft standard for data rates up to 150Mbit/s
and the 802.11 b/g standard.
|
Industry
Background
Semiconductors power, control and enable an increasing variety
of electronic products and systems. Improvements in
semiconductor process and design technologies continue to result
in ever more powerful, complex and reliable devices at a lower
cost per function. As their performance has increased and size
and costs have decreased, semiconductors have become common
components in an ever increasing number
67
of products used in everyday life, including personal computers,
telecommunications systems, wireless handheld devices,
automotive products, industrial automation and control systems,
digital cameras, digital audio devices, digital TVs, chip cards,
security applications and game consoles. According to WSTS
(November 2009), the global market for semiconductors in 2008
was $249 billion.
In addition to the adverse effects of the global economic
downturn and financial crisis on the entire semiconductor
industry, the semiconductor market, and hence our business, is
characterized by a number of distinct factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility: The market for
semiconductors has historically been volatile. Supply and demand
have fluctuated cyclically and have caused pronounced
fluctuations in prices and margins.
|
|
|
|
Cyclicality: The industrys
cyclicality results from a complex set of factors, including, in
particular, fluctuations in demand for the end products that use
semiconductors and fluctuations in the manufacturing capacity
available to produce semiconductors. We attempt to mitigate the
impact of cyclicality by investing in manufacturing capacities
throughout the cycle and entering into alliances and foundry
manufacturing arrangements that provide flexibility in
responding to changes in the cycle.
|
|
|
|
Seasonality: Our sales are affected by
seasonal and cyclical influences, with sales historically
strongest in our fourth fiscal quarter.
|
|
|
|
Product Life Cycles: Our business is
affected by the product life cycles determined by our customers
as a response to innovative technical solutions. The product
life cycle prior to the start of volume production can range
from several months to more than one year, or even several years
for automotive products. Due to this lengthy cycle, we may
experience significant delays from the time we incur expenses
for R&D, marketing efforts, and investments in inventory,
to the time we generate corresponding revenue, if any.
|
|
|
|
Substantial Capital and R&D
Expenditures: Semiconductor manufacturing is
very capital-intensive. The manufacturing capacities that are
essential to maintain a competitive cost position require large
capital investments. A high percentage of the cost of operating
a fab is fixed; therefore, increases or decreases in capacity
utilization can have a significant effect on profitability. To
reduce total costs, we intend to share the costs of our R&D
and manufacturing facilities with third parties, either by
establishing alliances or through the use of foundry facilities
for manufacturing.
|
|
|
|
Price Declines and Competition: Our
products generally have a certain degree of application
specification. Sales prices per unit are volatile and generally
decline over time due to technological developments and
competitive pressure. We aim to offset the effects of declining
unit sales prices on total net sales by optimizing product mix,
by increasing unit sales volume and by continually reducing
per-unit
production costs.
|
See Operating and Financial Review The
Semiconductor Industry and Factors that Impact Our
Business.
Strategy
We strive to achieve profitable growth by maintaining and
expanding our leadership position in semiconductor solutions in
our target markets. We are leveraging key market trends towards
energy efficiency, security, and communications and seek to:
|
|
|
|
|
Build on our leadership position in key markets, in
particular by helping to improve energy
efficiency. We believe that our success to
date has been based on a deep understanding of a wide range of
applications for the automotive and industrial sectors as well
as for personal computers and other consumer devices. Our
leading position in these areas is built on high-performance
products, superior process technologies and optimized in-house
manufacturing capabilities. We see significant growth potential
for our power business, in particular, driven by
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
high energy costs, a shift towards renewable energy generation,
and the need for ever longer battery life in mobile devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strengthen our leadership position in security
solutions. We seek to benefit from growth in
electronic and mobile communication and the growing desire to
access data anywhere and at any time, which drives demand for
data protection and data integrity such as secure authentication
and identification of users. We intend to leverage our know-how
to address applications in new areas, and believe we are well
positioned to benefit from future trends, such as the transition
to
e-Passports,
e-Health
cards and RFID ICs in logistics.
|
|
|
|
Provide the technology to be connected every day and
everywhere. We seek to continue to profit
from our key strengths in areas such as RF and mixed signal
technologies employed, in particular, in our wireless business.
In order to benefit from the ever-increasing need for mobility
and communication in all aspects of day-to-day life, we intend
to grow our broad customer base and to focus on the most
promising solutions for future profitable growth, such as
cellular phone platforms. In the wireless market, these include,
in particular, highly integrated, cost efficient single-chip
solutions and highly integrated cellular phone platforms for
wireless high speed data transfer in HSPA-enabled phones and
smart phones.
|
In addition, it is part of our manufacturing strategy to
carefully manage the mix of in-house versus outsourced
manufacturing capacity and process technology development. We
intend to continue to invest in those process technologies that
provide us with a competitive advantage. This is the case
particularly for our power process technologies and in
manufacturing capacity that can meet the very strict quality
requirements of automotive customers. At the same time, in
standard CMOS below the 90-nanometer node, we will continue to
share risks and expand our access to leading-edge technology
through long-term strategic partnerships with other leading
industry participants. We do not intend to invest in in-house
capacity for standard CMOS processes below the 90-nanometer
node, and will make use of outsourced manufacturing capacity at
silicon foundries instead.
We believe that ongoing cost control and projects to continually
improve productivity are important elements to support the
successful implementation of our profitable growth strategy.
69
Products and
Applications
Principal
Products, Applications and Customers
The following summary provides an overview of some of our more
significant products and applications and some of the more
significant direct customers of each of our segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the 2009
|
Segment
|
|
Principal Products
|
|
Principal Applications
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Automotive
|
|
Power semiconductors (discretes, ICs and modules), sensors and
microcontrollers (8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit) with and without
embedded memory, silicon discretes
|
|
Powertrain (engine control, transmission control, hybrid), body
and convenience (comfort electronics, air conditioning), safety
and vehicle dynamics (ABS, airbag, stability control),
connectivity (wireless communication, telematics/navigation)
|
|
Avnet, Bosch, Continental, Delphi
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
Power semiconductors (discretes, ICs and modules), silicon
discretes, ASIC solutions including secure ASICs
|
|
Power management & supplies, lighting, drives, renewable
energy, power generation and distribution, industrial control,
RF and protection devices for multimarket applications, ASICs
(for example, for game consoles, hearing aids, computer
peripherals)
|
|
Avnet, Delta, Siemens, WPG Holdings
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
Chip card and security ICs
|
|
Security memory ICs and security microcontroller ICs for
identification documents, payment cards, SIM cards, prepaid
telecom cards, access and transportation cards, Pay TV and
platform security products for computers and networks (for
example, Trusted Platform Modules), RFID ICs for object
identification
|
|
Gemalto, Giesecke & Devrient, Oberthur Card Systems, U.S.
Government Printing Office
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
Baseband ICs, RF transceivers, power management ICs, single chip
ICs integrating these components, mobile phone platform
solutions including software, tuner ICs, RF-power transistors
|
|
Mobile telephone solutions for major standards (GSM, GPRS, EDGE,
UMTS, HSPA, LTE), RF connectivity solutions (for example,
Bluetooth, GPS), cellular base stations
|
|
Hon Hai Precision, LG Electronics, Nokia, Samsung
|
Automotive
The Automotive segment designs, develops, manufactures and
markets semiconductors and complete system solutions for use in
automotive applications. Our Automotive segment focuses on
microcontrollers and power semiconductors (which handle higher
voltage and higher current than standard semiconductors),
discrete semiconductors, modules and sensors. According to
Strategy Analytics (May 2009), we have been the number two chip
manufacturer for the automotive industry by revenue for the past
five years, with more than 9 percent of the worldwide market,
and the largest in Europe.
The market for semiconductors for automotive applications has
grown substantially in recent years, reflecting increased
electronic content in automotive applications in the areas of
safety, powertrain, body and convenience systems. This growth
also reflects increasing substitution of mechanical devices,
such as relays, by semiconductors, in order to meet more
demanding reliability, space, weight, and power reduction
requirements. However, the market for semiconductors for
automotive applications contracted during the 2009 fiscal year
due to the economic downturn. The resulting decrease in revenue
was in line with the volume reduction in the automobile market
driven by the economic downturn. In addition, we saw a temporary
market shift to smaller-sized cars with lower semiconductor
content triggered by national car-scrap bonus programs and an
economic stimulus program in China.
70
Our automotive division offers semiconductors and complete
system solutions in the engine management, safety and chassis,
body and convenience, and infotainment markets, in some cases
including software. Our principal automotive products include:
|
|
|
|
|
semiconductors for powertrain applications, which perform, for
example, engine and transmission control and enable hybrid
powertrains;
|
|
|
|
semiconductors for safety management, which manage tasks such as
the operation of airbags, anti-lock braking systems, electronic
stability systems, power steering systems and tire pressure
monitoring systems;
|
|
|
|
semiconductors for body and convenience systems, which include
light modules, heating, ventilation and air conditioning
systems, door modules (power windows, door locks, mirror
control) and electrical power distribution systems.
|
According to Strategy Analytics (January 2009), the safety,
chassis and security segment comprises the largest portion of
the market, followed by powertrain applications, such as
transmission, engine and exhaust control, then body
applications, and finally in-car entertainment and driver
information.
Our automotive products include power semiconductors,
microcontrollers, discrete semiconductors and silicon sensors,
along with related technologies and packaging. To take advantage
of expected growth in the market for green vehicles,
our power competencies across all of our business divisions are
bundled in order to better enable us to provide semiconductor
and power module solutions for hybrid vehicles.
Time periods between design and sale of our automotive products
are relatively prolonged (three to four years) because of the
long periods required for the development of new automotive
platforms, many of which may be in different stages of
development at any time. This is one of the reasons why
automotive products tend to have relatively long life-cycles
compared to our other products. The nature of this market,
together with the need to meet demanding quality and reliability
requirements designed to ensure safe automobile operation, makes
it relatively difficult for new suppliers to enter.
In order to strengthen our position in all areas of automotive
electronics, we seek to further develop our strong relationships
with world-wide leading car manufacturers and their suppliers,
with a particular focus on those at the forefront in using
electronic components in cars. We believe that our ability to
offer complete semiconductor solutions integrating power, analog
and mixed-signal ICs and sensor technology is an important
differentiating factor among companies in the automotive market.
We strongly emphasize high quality in our products. We have
implemented a program called Automotive Excellence, through
which we aim for the goal of zero defects in our
automotive semiconductors and solutions.
Industrial &
Multimarket
The Industrial & Multimarket segment designs,
develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and complete
system solutions primarily for use in industrial and multimarket
applications, in addition to applications with customer-specific
product requirements. Within the fragmented market for
industrial semiconductor applications, we focus on power
management and supply, as well as drives and power generation
and distribution. IMS Research (July 2009) reported that we
were the number one supplier worldwide for power semiconductors
and power modules by total revenue in 2008 with a market share
of more than 10 percent. We have a broad portfolio
addressing consumer, computing and communication applications.
The market for semiconductors for industrial applications is
highly fragmented in terms of both suppliers and customers. It
is characterized by large numbers of both standardized and
application-specific products employed in a large number of
diverse applications in industries such as transportation,
factory automation and power supplies.
71
Within the industrial business, we focus on two major
applications: power management & supply and power
conversion. We provide differentiated products combining diverse
technologies to meet our customers specific needs. With
global energy demand continuing to rise, supplies generally
tightening and concerns over the environmental impact of power
generation rising, power semiconductors can make a major
contribution by addressing the increasing need for energy
savings.
We have a strong position in power applications. According to
IMS Research (July 2009), we have been the global market leader
for power semiconductors and power modules for the past six
years, with a 10.2 percent market share in 2008.
Our broad portfolio comprises power modules, small signal and
discrete power semiconductors and power management ICs. Our
industrial products are used in a wide range of applications,
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
power supplies (AC/DC), divided into two main categories:
uninterruptible power supplies, such as power backbones for
internet servers; and switched-mode power supplies for PCs,
servers and consumer electronics such as televisions and gaming
consoles, as well as battery chargers for mobile phones,
notebook computers and other handheld devices;
|
|
|
|
DC/DC power converters for computing and communication
applications such as motherboards, telecommunications equipment
and graphic cards;
|
|
|
|
lighting (electronic lamp ballast and control and LED drivers);
|
|
|
|
drives for machine tools, motor controls, pumps, fans and
heating, ventilation, consumer appliances (such as washing
machines), air-conditioning systems and transportation as well
as power supplies for additional consumer appliances such as
inductive cooking;
|
|
|
|
industrial automation and metering systems;
|
|
|
|
power generation, especially in the fields of renewable energy
and power distribution systems; and
|
|
|
|
other industrial applications such as medical equipment.
|
Our portfolio of RF and protection devices includes:
|
|
|
|
|
radio frequency (RF) devices (diodes, transistors, Monolithic
Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMICs), CMOS based RF switches,
Small Scale Integrated Circuits (SSICs));
|
|
|
|
protection devices such as Transient Voltage Suppressor diodes
(TVS diodes) and High Performance Active and Passive Integration
(HIPAC) devices offering Electro Static Discharge/Electro
Magnetic Interference (ESD/EMI) protection and high integration
in advanced applications (for example, in mobile communication
devices);
|
|
|
|
High Reliability Discretes (bipolar transistors and diodes) for
use in space and avionic applications;
|
|
|
|
Silicon MEMS Microphone (SMM): acoustical sensors based on
Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) semiconductor technology
(for use in mobile phone applications, for example); and
|
|
|
|
audio frequency (AF) discretes (general purpose diodes and
transistors, switching diodes, digital transistors).
|
Within our ASIC activities, we focus on customer-specific
products integrating intellectual property from our customers
with our own IP. These products are used in a variety of
markets, with a special focus on industrial usage, mobility, and
security. The main products of this business unit include:
|
|
|
|
|
products for computer and gaming peripherals;
|
|
|
|
secure ASICs and ASSPs for authentication or copy protection
applications, taking advantage of our security know-how; and
|
|
|
|
customer designs manufactured by us on a foundry basis.
|
72
Most of these products are tailored to customer specifications
and are often provided by us on a sole-source basis. As a
result, we are often able to establish long-term relationships
with customers in this area, in some cases actively supporting
the customers product roadmap.
Chip
Card & Security
Our Chip Card & Security segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of security controllers
and security memories for chip card and security applications.
According to Frost & Sullivan (October 2009), we
remained the market leader in ICs for smart card applications in
the 2008 calendar year for the twelfth consecutive year, with a
market share of 26 percent.
The markets for our security products are characterized by an
increasing emphasis on high-security applications, such as
identification and payment, and by trends towards lower prices
and higher demand for embedded non-volatile memory in SIM cards.
In our Chip Card & Security business, we focus on
products making use of our core competencies in security,
contactless ICs and embedded control. Our products are used in a
variety of markets, with a special focus on communication,
payment, government identification, personal and object
identification, and platform security. The main products of this
segment include:
|
|
|
|
|
contact-based and contactless security microcontroller ICs for
identification documents (for example, passports, national
identification cards and health cards), payment cards, SIM cards
and Pay-TV applications;
|
|
|
|
security memory ICs in prepaid telecom cards, access and
transportation cards;
|
|
|
|
Trusted Platform Module (TPM) products
(hardware-based security for trusted computing) in computers and
networks; and
|
|
|
|
RFID ICs for object identification (for example, in logistics).
|
Wireless
Solutions
Our Wireless Solutions segment designs, develops, manufactures
and markets a wide range of ICs, other semiconductors and
complete system solutions for wireless communication
applications. We are among the leading players in the markets
for semiconductor solutions for mobile phones.
In the Wireless Solutions segment, our principal products
include baseband ICs, RF transceivers and single-chip ICs for
the major air interface standards (GSM, GPRS, EDGE, UMTS and
HSPA), power management ICs, radio-frequency products such as
Bluetooth ICs, GPS ICs, and Tuner ICs, as well as
RF-power
components for wireless infrastructure (base stations). Our
principal solutions include hardware system design and software
solutions for mobile telephone systems (addressing primarily the
GSM, GPRS, EDGE, UMTS and HSPA standards).
According to iSuppli (June 2009), in the 2008 calendar year we
held the number four position in wireless ASSPs with a worldwide
market share of 6 percent.
The markets for products in which our cellular communication ICs
and systems are utilized are characterized by trends towards
lower cost, increasingly rapid succession of product
generations, increased system integration, and market
consolidation. According to Strategy Analytics (May 2009),
approximately 1.2 billion cellular handsets were produced
in the 2008 calendar year, compared with approximately
1.1 billion devices in 2007. This growth was to a large
extent driven by strong demand in emerging markets. Increasing
demand for connectivity and multimedia capability is expected to
increase the IC content of mobile phones. However, despite such
increased demand, the average selling prices for cellular phone
ICs have declined in recent years. We expect that a further
price decline of entry-level handset models, often referred to
as Ultra Low Cost telephones, will generate
additional demand in emerging markets. We expect these trends to
create both opportunities and threats for suppliers of cellular
73
communication semiconductors and systems. In recent periods,
however, the market for semiconductors for wireless solutions
has contracted due to the current economic downturn.
We offer products and solutions to customers in the following
principal application areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM), which
is the de facto wireless telephone standard in Europe and
available in more than 120 countries. GSM is a wireless mobile
telecommunication standard that includes, among others, General
Packet Radio Service (GPRS) and EDGE. We offer
products and solutions such as baseband ICs, RF transceivers,
power management ICs, single-chip ICs integrating these
components, mobile software, and reference designs addressing
all of these wireless communication standards;
|
|
|
|
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), a
GSM-based standard for third-generation (3G)
broadband, packet-based transmission of text, digitized voice,
video, and multimedia at data rates up to 2 megabits per second
(Mbps). We offer complete multimedia mobile phone
platforms, RF transceivers and mobile software for UMTS and also
for the High-Speed Packet Access standard (HSPA)
that supports data rates of up to 7.2 Mbps;
|
|
|
|
Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) and other digital
and analog television standards. We offer tuner ICs for
stationary, portable and mobile television receivers for the
analog (PAL, NTSC, SECAM) and digital (DVB-C/T/H, ISDB-T, ATSC,
DAB, T-DMB, CMMB) TV standards;
|
|
|
|
The Global Positioning System (GPS), a location
system based on a network of satellites. GPS is widely used in
automotive, wireless, mobile computing and consumer
applications. Together with a development partner, we have
introduced
XPOSYStm,
our next generation of single-chip advanced GPS receiver for
mobile telephones, smart phones and PDAs with competitive
superiority in terms of sensitivity, power consumption and
footprint;
|
|
|
|
Bluetooth, a computing and telecommunications industry
specification that allows mobile phones, computers and PDAs to
connect with each other and with home and business phones and
computers using a short-range wireless connection. We offer
BlueMoontm
UniCellular, a fast and energy-efficient Bluetooth-chip which
supports the Bluetooth enhanced data rate (EDR)
protocol; and
|
|
|
|
Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service (SDARS), a
satellite-based radio communication service through which audio
programming is digitally transmitted by space-based satellites
and terrestrial repeaters to fixed, mobile,
and/or
portable subscription consumer radios.
|
Wireline
Communications
On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business, which
closed on November 6, 2009. The Wireline Communications
business designs, develops, manufactures and markets a wide
range of ICs, other semiconductors and complete system solutions
focused on wireline access applications.
Customers, Sales
and Marketing
Customers
We sell our products to customers located mainly in Europe, the
United States, the Asia/Pacific region and Japan.
We target our sales and marketing efforts on creating demand at
approximately 440 direct customers worldwide.
No customer accounted for more than 10 percent of our sales
in the 2009 fiscal year, and our top 25 customers accounted for
approximately 72 percent of our sales.
74
We focus our sales efforts on semiconductors customized to meet
our customers needs. We therefore seek to design our
products and solutions in cooperation with our customers so as
to become their preferred supplier. We also seek to create
relationships with our major customers that are leaders in their
market segments and have the most demanding technological
requirements in order to obtain the system expertise necessary
to compete in the semiconductor markets.
We have sales offices throughout the world. We believe that this
global presence enables us not only to respond promptly to our
customers needs, but also to be involved in our
customers product development processes and thereby be in
a better position to design customized ICs and solutions for
their new products. We believe that cooperation with customers
that are leaders in their respective fields provides us with a
special insight into these customers concerns and future
development of the market. Contacts to our customers
customers and market studies about the end consumer also
position us to be an effective partner for our customers.
We believe that a key element of our success is our ability to
offer a broad portfolio of technological capabilities and
competitive services to support our customers in providing
innovative and competitive products to their customers and
markets. This ability permits us to balance variations in demand
in different markets and, in our view, is a significant factor
in differentiating us from many of our competitors.
Customers by
principal segment
Automotive
In the Automotive segment, which includes sales of
microcontrollers, power devices and sensors, our customer base
includes most of the worlds major automotive suppliers.
Our two largest customers in the 2009 fiscal year were Bosch and
Continental. Sales of automotive products are made primarily in
Europe and, to an increasing extent, in the United States,
China, Korea and Japan. A significant portion of our automotive
sales came from the distribution channel, with Avnet and Arrow
accounting for the highest revenues among our distribution
partners.
Industrial &
Multimarket
In the Industrial & Multimarket segment, the Siemens
group is the largest OEM customer. The bulk of our sales of
industrial products are made in small volumes to customers that
are either served directly or through third-party distributors
such as Arrow, Avnet and WPG Holdings. Our sales of industrial
products vary by type of product, with devices for drive and
power conversion applications sold primarily in Europe and the
United States, and devices for power management and supply sold
primarily in Asia (other than Japan) and Europe. Our wide
variety of RF and protection devices is targeted at customers in
all major fields of applications, including automotive,
consumer, computing and communication.
With our broad and complementary IP portfolio, system
integration skills, and manufacturing expertise, we seek to
leverage our IP in ASIC-based system solutions. We concentrate
on customized designs for customers such as Siemens and
Microsoft Corporation.
Chip
Card & Security
Our Chip Card & Security segment derives a large
portion of its revenues from large-scale projects like ePassport
projects. Within this segment, three card
manufacturers Gemalto, Giesecke & Devrient
and Oberthur Card Systems currently account for a
significant portion of sales. Other than the card manufacturers,
our customer base includes secure printers, such as the
U.S. Government Printing Office, and customers served
through distribution channels.
Wireless
Solutions
In our Wireless Solutions segment, we sell a variety of products
addressing applications such as cellular phones, ICs for GPS and
wireless infrastructure to most of the worlds leading
wireless device and equipment suppliers. In cellular phone
applications, customers purchase products that range from ASSPs
75
and customized ASSPs that we produce to customer design and
specifications to complete system solutions including mobile
software. With complete system solutions, we target OEMs as well
as design houses and ODMs. Our largest announced cellular phone
customers include LG Electronics, Nokia and Samsung. We supply
RF-power products to wireless infrastructure customers such as
Ericsson. In the 2009 fiscal year. Our Wireless Solutions
segment derived 27 percent of its revenues from two related
customers.
Sales and
Marketing
As of September 30, 2009, we had 1,680 sales and marketing
employees worldwide, including approximately 30 sales and
marketing employees worldwide in the Wireline Communications
segment.
We create and fulfill our product sales either directly or
through our network of distribution partners.
A team of Corporate Account Executives is assigned to develop
business relationships with our most important strategic
customers. Dedicated Account Managers foster our relationships
with all other important direct customers. Regional sales units
offer additional support for global accounts based in their
regions, as well as local accounts that are key players in
specific markets. In three smaller markets, we have contractual
arrangements with the Siemens and Epcos sales organizations to
provide defined sales support.
To serve the broader market and expand our indirect sales, a
dedicated organization develops, maintains and interacts with a
strong network of distribution partners. This optimized network
includes globally active distributors, strong regional partners
and committed niche specialists. In addition, third-party sales
representatives help to identify and create business,
particularly in the United States.
A number of our important direct customers increasingly
outsource activities ranging from product design and procurement
to manufacturing and logistics to global Electronics
Manufacturing Services (EMS). To meet the specific
requirements of the EMS industry, we have a dedicated EMS sales
team. Focusing on the EMS market leaders, these account managers
follow up on manufacturing transfers from OEM to EMS and
conclude strategic partnerships for design and technology to
increase our market share within the EMS channel.
Within each of our business divisions, we have product- and
application-oriented marketing employees. These employees
investigate market trends and the needs of their respective
segments to grow our market share. They define, develop,
optimize and position new products and provide product support
from market introduction up to the end-of-life stage.
Finally, we utilize advertising campaigns, mainly in the trade
press, to establish and strengthen our identity as a major
semiconductor provider. Furthermore, we actively participate in
trade shows, conferences and events to strengthen our brand
recognition and industry presence.
Backlog
Standard
Products
Industry cyclicality makes it undesirable for many customers to
enter into long-term, fixed-price contracts to purchase standard
(that is, non-customized) semiconductor products. As a result,
the market prices of our standard semiconductor products, and
our revenues from sales of these products, fluctuate very
significantly from period to period. Most of our standard
products are priced, and orders are accepted, with an
understanding that the price and other contract terms may be
adjusted to reflect market conditions at the delivery date. It
is a common industry practice to permit major customers to
change the date on which products are delivered or to cancel
existing orders. For these reasons, we believe that the backlog
at any time of standard products is not a reliable indicator of
future sales.
76
Non-Standard
Products
For more customized products, orders are generally made well in
advance of delivery. Quantities and prices of such products may
nevertheless change between the times they are ordered and when
they are delivered, reflecting changes in customer needs and
industry conditions. During periods of industry overcapacity and
falling sales prices, customer orders are generally not made as
far in advance of the scheduled shipment date as during periods
of capacity constraints, and more customers request logistics
agreements based on rolling forecasts. The resulting lower
levels of backlog reduce our managements ability to
forecast optimum production levels and future revenues. As a
result, we do not rely solely on backlog to manage our business
and do not use it to evaluate performance.
Competition
The markets for many of our products are intensely competitive,
and we face significant competition in each of our product
lines. We compete with other major international semiconductor
companies, some of which have substantially greater financial
and other resources with which to pursue research, development,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products.
Smaller niche companies are also becoming increasingly important
players in the semiconductor market, and semiconductor foundry
companies have expanded significantly. Competitors include
manufacturers of standard semiconductors, application-specific
ICs and fully customized ICs, including both chip and
board-level products, as well as customers that develop their
own integrated circuit products and foundry operations. We also
cooperate in some areas with companies that are our competitors
in other areas.
The following table shows key competitors for each of our
principal operating segments in alphabetical order:
Key Competitors
by Segment
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
Freescale, International Rectifier, Mitsubishi, ON
Semiconductor, NEC, NXP, Renesas, STMicroelectronics, Texas
Instruments
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
Fairchild, Fuji Electric, International Rectifier, Mitsubishi,
NXP, ON Semiconductor, Renesas, STMicroelectronics, Texas
Instruments, Toshiba, Vishay
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
Atmel, NXP, Renesas, Samsung, STMicroelectronics, Texas
Instruments
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
Broadcom, Mediatek, Qualcomm, ST-Ericsson
|
We compete in different product lines to various degrees on the
basis of product design, technical performance, price,
production capacity, product features, product system
compatibility, delivery times, quality and level of support.
Innovation and quality are competitive factors for all segments.
Production capacity as well as the ability to deliver products
reliably and within a very short period of time play
particularly important roles.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on elements both
within and outside of our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
successful and timely development of new products, services and
manufacturing processes;
|
|
|
|
product performance and quality;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing costs, yields and product availability;
|
|
|
|
pricing;
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet changes in our customers demands by
altering production at our facilities;
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide solutions that meet our customers
specific needs;
|
|
|
|
the competence and agility of our sales, technical support and
marketing organizations; and
|
|
|
|
the resilience of our supply chain for services that we
outsource and the delivery of products, raw materials and
services by third-party providers needed for our manufacturing
capabilities.
|
Manufacturing
Our production of semiconductors is generally divided into two
steps, referred to as the front-end process and the back-end
process.
Front-end
In the first step, the front-end process, electronic circuits
are produced on raw silicon wafers through a series of
patterning, etching, deposition and implantation processes. At
the end of the front-end process, we test the chips for
functionality.
The structure size of our current products is as small as
65-nanometers, with our 65-nanometer technology being qualified
at multiple manufacturing sites of external partners.
We believe that we achieve substantial differentiation at our
customers due to our power semiconductor process technology and
our world-wide network of manufacturing sites that combine the
highest quality standards and flexibility.
Back-end
In the second step of semiconductor production, the back-end
process (also known as the packaging, assembly and test phase),
the processed wafers are ground and mounted on a synthetic foil,
which is fixed in a wafer frame. Mounted on this foil, the wafer
is diced into small silicon chips, each one containing a
complete integrated circuit. One or multiple individual chips
are removed from the foil and fixed onto a substrate or
lead-frame base, which will enable the physical connection of
the product to the electronic board. The next step is creating
electrical links between the chip and the base by soldering or
wiring. Subsequently, the chips and electrical links are molded
with plastic compounds for stabilization and protection.
Depending on the package type, the molded chips undergo a
separation and pin bending process. Finally, the semiconductor
is subject to functional tests.
Our back-end facilities are equipped with
state-of-the-art
equipment and highly automated manufacturing technology,
enabling us to perform assembly and test on a cost-effective
basis. We have improved our cost position by moving significant
production volumes to lower-cost countries such as Malaysia and
China. Our back-end facilities also provide us with the
flexibility needed to customize products according to individual
customer specifications (giving us System in Package
capabilities). We are continuing the process of converting our
packages to comply with new international environmental
requirements for lead-
and/or
halogen-free green packages.
78
Manufacturing
Facilities
We operate manufacturing facilities around the world, including
through joint ventures in which we participate. There are no
material encumbrances on our manufacturing facilities. The
following table shows selected key information with respect to
our current major manufacturing facilities:
Manufacturing
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
|
commencement
|
|
|
|
|
of first
|
|
|
|
|
production line
|
|
Principal products or functions
|
|
Front-end facilities wafer fabrication plants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
ASICs and MCUs with embedded flash memory, logic ICs
|
Essonnes,
France(1)
|
|
|
1963
|
(2)
|
|
Logic ICs and ASICs with embedded flash memory
|
Kulim, Malaysia
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Power, smart power, ASICs and MCUs with embedded flash memory
|
Regensburg, Germany
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Power, smart power, sensors, mixed signal
|
Villach, Austria
|
|
|
1979
|
|
|
Power, smart power and discretes
|
Warstein, Germany
|
|
|
1965
|
(2)
|
|
High power
|
Back-end facilities assembly and final testing
plants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Batam, Indonesia
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Leaded power and non-power ICs
|
Cegléd, Hungary
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
High power
|
Morgan Hill, California
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
RF-power
|
Regensburg, Germany
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Chip card modules, sensors and pilot lines
|
Singapore
|
|
|
1970
|
|
|
Leadless non-power ICs, wafer test
|
Warstein, Germany
|
|
|
1965
|
(2)(3)
|
|
High power
|
Wuxi, China
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Discretes, chip card modules
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
Discretes, power packages, sensors, leaded and non-leaded logic
IC
|
Notes
|
|
(1)
|
ALTIS, our joint venture with IBM.
|
|
(2)
|
The current main production line began operations in 1991.
|
|
(3)
|
Part of the Infineon Technologies Bipolar joint venture with
Siemens.
|
In addition to our own manufacturing capacity, we have entered
into a number of alliances and joint ventures, and have
relationships with several foundry partners, which give us
access to substantial additional manufacturing capacity,
allowing us to more flexibly meet variable demand for products
over market cycles. These arrangements are described below and
under the heading Strategic Alliances and Other
Collaborations.
Front-end
Our front-end facilities currently have a capacity of
approximately 240,000 200-millimeter equivalent wafer starts per
month. In implementing our fab-light strategy, we
have begun to shift the focus of our in-house manufacturing
toward power logic products and to shift manufacturing of
advanced CMOS logic products to foundries.
Currently, in-house production of advanced logic wafers (with
structure sizes of 250-nanometers or less) is carried out at our
200-millimeter wafer manufacturing facility in Dresden and at
our ALTIS joint-venture with IBM in Essonnes, France, while
in-house production of power logic wafers (with structure
79
sizes of more than 250-nanometers) is largely carried out at our
front-end manufacturing facilities in Kulim, Regensburg, and
Villach.
Generally, we use foundries to provide flexibility in meeting
demand, as well as managing investment expenditures. In recent
years, we have enhanced our manufacturing cooperation with
United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC), Chartered
Semiconductor (CSMC) and Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC), particularly with
respect to leading-edge CMOS products for wireless
communications down to 65-nanometers.
We are partnering within the International Semiconductor
Development Alliance (ISDA), a technology alliance
between IBM, AMD/GlobalFoundries, Chartered Semiconductor,
Freescale, us, NEC, Samsung, STMicroelectronics and Toshiba for
CMOS development and manufacturing at 45-nanometer and
32-nanometer process to accelerate the move to 65-nanometer and
below. We currently deliver 65-nanometer products to customers
and have begun to develop products based on 40-nanometer
technology, which we currently plan will first be manufactured
at one of our manufacturing partners. Our current agreements
build on the success of earlier joint development and
manufacturing agreements. Starting with 65-nanometer technology,
our advanced logic front-end manufacturing will be solely
sourced from manufacturing partners, optimizing capital
investment and business flexibility. In November 2009, we
announced the signing of a joint development agreement on
65-nanometer embedded Flash technologies together with TSMC.
We are continuing the ramp up of our power-logic plant in the
Kulim Hi-Tech Park in the north of Malaysia and plan to further
increase our production capacity at that site. This will allow
us to further expand our presence in the growing Asian market,
as well as to strengthen our cost and competitive positions. We
expect that maximum capacity could reach approximately 100,000
wafer starts per month when the facility is fully ramped up, as
and when market demand dictates.
Back-end
We have a number of back-end facilities, located primarily in
Asia. We also use assembly and test subcontractors to provide us
with flexibility in meeting demand, as well as managing
investment expenditures. For assembly services, we have further
intensified our partnership with AMKOR Technology on leadless
and flip-chip technologies.
We and Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc.,
(ASE) announced in November 2007 a partnership to
introduce semiconductor packages with a higher integration level
of package size, the Wafer-Level Ball Grid Array
technology, which achieves a 30 percent reduction of
dimension compared to conventional (lead-frame laminate)
packages. This partnership unites the technology developed by us
with the packaging know-how of ASE in a license model.
In August 2008, we, STMicroelectronics and STATS ChipPAC
announced an agreement to jointly develop the next-generation of
eWLB technology, based on our first-generation technology, for
use in manufacturing future-generation semiconductor packages.
This will build on our existing eWLB packaging technology, which
we have licensed to our development partners. The R&D
effort, for which the resulting IP will be jointly owned by the
three companies, focuses on using both sides of a reconstituted
wafer to provide solutions for semiconductor devices with a
higher integration level and a greater number of contact
elements.
80
Research and
Development
R&D is critical to our continuing success, and we are
committed to maintaining high levels of R&D over the long
term. The table below sets forth information with respect to our
R&D expenditures for the periods shown:
Research and
Development Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
( in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Expenditures (net of subsidies received)
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
As a percentage of revenue
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Our R&D activities are concentrated in the areas of
semiconductor based product and system development, as well as
process technology. Major R&D activities range from the
development of leading edge RF, analog and power circuits,
complex digital
system-on-chip
solutions, high and low power discretes, sensors, reusable
IP-blocks,
software blocks, CAD flow and libraries, and packaging
technology to complex mobile phone system integration.
Our ICs generally utilize complex
system-on-chip
designs and require a wide variety of intellectual property and
sophisticated design methodologies, to combine high performance
with low power consumption. We believe that our range of
intellectual property and methodologies for logic ICs, in
particular our capability to integrate various ICs and complex
software products, will enable us to continue to strengthen our
position in the logic IC market. We view expertise in
analog/mixed-signal devices and RF design as a particular
competitive strength.
Our power ICs and discrete power transistors utilize a
sophisticated co-design of circuits and technology procedures to
optimize parameters like on-resistance, switching speed and
reliability. We believe our expertise in all fields of power
applications up to the highest voltage and current levels will
enable us to retain a leading development position and help us
to remain a leading supplier for power semiconductors.
Process technologies are another important focus of our R&D
activities. We continuously develop our power technologies in
order to support our number one position in the power market.
Requirements for automotive and industrial applications, such as
high-temperature, high switching power and reliability, allow
for differentiation through in-house R&D. For advanced
logic technologies we are following a strategy of alliances with
several partners and consortia to maintain a competitive
technology roadmap at an affordable cost level. Our process
technologies benefit from many modular characteristics,
including special low-power variants, analog options and
high-voltage capabilities.
81
Locations
Our R&D activities are conducted at locations throughout
the world. The following table shows our major R&D
locations and their respective areas of competence:
Principal
Research and Development
Locations(1)
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Areas of Competence
|
|
Allentown, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
|
|
IC, software and system development for wireless products
|
Bangalore, India
|
|
IC, software and system development for wireless, automotive and
industrial products, CAD flow and library development
|
Bucharest, Romania
|
|
Power mixed-signal semiconductors, chip card ICs
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
Advanced technology development
|
Duisburg, Germany
|
|
IC and system development for wireless products, RF IC
development
|
Graz, Austria
|
|
Contactless systems, automotive power systems, sensor products
|
Linz, Austria
|
|
RF IC and software development for wireless and sensor products
|
Morgan Hill, California, U.S.A.
|
|
RF IC development for high power applications
|
Munich, Germany
|
|
Main product development site. Technology integration, CAD flow,
library development, IC, software and system development for
wireless products, microcontrollers, ASICs, chip card ICs,
automotive power and industrial products, process technology
development
|
Nuremberg, Germany
|
|
Software and system development for wireless products
|
Regensburg, Germany
|
|
Package development, process technology development
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
System development for wireless products
|
Singapore
|
|
IC, software and system development for wireless and industrial
products, package development
|
Sophia Antipolis, France
|
|
IC development for wireless products, library development, CAD
flow
|
Torrance, California, U.S.A.
|
|
Development of digital power ICs
|
Villach, Austria
|
|
Development for power semiconductor products, mixed signal
Development for automotive and communication products
|
Xian, China
|
|
IC development for automotive and communication products
|
Note:
|
|
(1) |
On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business, and the
sale closed on November 6, 2009. The sale affected
engineers in the principal research and development locations of
Bangalore, India, Duisburg, Germany, Munich, Germany, Singapore
and Villach, Austria, who were transferred to Lantiq but will
continue using our facilities under lease and
sub-lease
agreements.
|
As of September 30, 2009, our R&D staff consisted of
5,971 employees working in our R&D units throughout
the world, including 509 employees in our Wireline
Communications business. We have given particular emphasis in
recent years to the expansion of our R&D resources in
cost-attractive locations with good access to lead markets and
lead customers. We believe that appropriate utilization of
skilled R&D personnel in lower-cost locations will improve
our ability to maintain our technical position while controlling
expenses.
82
Intellectual
Property
Our intellectual property rights include patents, copyrights,
trade secrets, trademarks, utility models and designs. The
subjects of our patents primarily relate to IC designs and
process technologies. We believe that our intellectual property
is a valuable asset not only to protect our investment in
technology but also a vital prerequisite for cross licensing
agreements with third-parties.
As of September 30, 2009, we owned more than 20,800 patent
applications and patents (both referred to as
patents below) in over 40 countries throughout the
world. These patents belong to approximately 8,150 patent
families (each patent family containing all patents
originating from the same invention). We transferred 1,900 of
those patent applications and patents (approximately 820 patent
families) to Lantiq upon the closing of the sale of our Wireline
Communications business on November 6, 2009.
National and regional patent offices examine whether our patent
applications meet the necessary requirements. Owing to the
complex nature of our patent applications this examination
process typically takes several years until grant of a patent.
It is common industry practice for semiconductor companies to
enter into patent cross licensing agreements with each other.
These agreements enable each company to utilize the patents of
the other on specified conditions. In some cases, these
agreements provide for payments to be made by one party to the
other. We are a party to a number of patent cross licensing
agreements, including agreements with other major semiconductor
companies. We believe that our own substantial patent portfolio
enables us to enter into patent cross licensing agreements on
favorable terms and conditions. We are in ongoing patent cross
licensing negotiations with other industry participants.
Depending on new developments, new products or other business
necessities, we may initiate additional patent cross licensing
agreements in the future.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents,
licenses and other intellectual property rights covering our
products and their design and manufacturing processes. To that
end, we have obtained many patents and patent licenses and
intend to continue to seek patents on our developments. The
process of seeking patent protection can be lengthy and
expensive, and there can be no assurance that patents will be
issued from currently pending or future applications or that, if
patents are issued, they will be of sufficient scope or strength
to provide us with meaningful protection or a commercial
advantage, or that they will not be revoked upon a third-party
challenge. In addition, effective copyright, trademark and trade
secret protection may be limited in some countries or even
unavailable. In many jurisdictions, including Germany, when a
licensee or licensor becomes insolvent or bankrupt, the license
may be subject to limitation, termination or other impairment.
Thus, insolvency and bankruptcy issues concerning our
intra-group or extra-group licensing counterparties could have a
material adverse effect on our business, including, but not
limited to, competitors benefiting from license arrangements, or
termination of cross-licenses, that could leave us with
insufficient intellectual property rights to continue our
business as intended or at all.
Our competitors also seek to protect their technology by
obtaining patents and asserting other forms of intellectual
property rights. Third-party technology that is protected by
patents and other intellectual property rights may be
unavailable to us or available only on unfavorable terms and
conditions. Third parties may also claim that our technology
infringes their patents or other intellectual property rights,
and they may bring suit against us to protect their intellectual
property rights. From time to time, it may also be necessary for
us to initiate legal action to enforce our own intellectual
property rights. Litigation can be very expensive and can divert
financial resources and management attention from other
important issues. It is difficult or impossible to predict the
outcome of most litigation matters, and an adverse outcome can
result in significant financial costs that can have a material
adverse effect on the losing party. For a description of ongoing
disputes, see note 38 to our consolidated financial statements.
83
Strategic
Alliances and Other Collaborations
As a part of our long-term strategy, we have entered into a
number of strategic alliances with other leaders in the
semiconductor industry, primarily in the areas of R&D for
manufacturing process technologies and joint manufacturing
facilities as well as cooperative product design and development.
In addition to our own manufacturing capacity, we have entered
into a number of alliances and joint ventures, and have
relationships with several foundry partners, which give us
access to substantial additional manufacturing capacity,
allowing us to more flexibly meet variable demand for products
over market cycles. These arrangements are described below under
Manufacturing joint ventures;
Foundries.
Manufacturing
joint ventures; Foundries
Joint Venture
with IBM (ALTIS)
In 1991, we entered into an arrangement with IBM, under which
IBM manufactured DRAM products in its facility in Essonnes,
France and we received a share of the production. Later we
agreed with IBM to convert the Essonnes facility to the
production of logic devices and to convert the existing
production cooperation arrangement into a joint venture called
ALTIS. We currently own 50 percent of the joint
ventures shares plus one share and IBM owns the rest. Our
allocated percentage of the output of ALTIS is currently
100 percent.
In December 2005, we amended our agreements with IBM in respect
of ALTIS, and extended our product purchase agreement with ALTIS
through 2009. Under the December 2005 amendment, we and IBM
agreed to a number of administrative matters regarding the
governance and management of ALTIS, as well as related
cost-allocation and accounting matters. We began to fully
consolidate ALTIS following the December 19, 2005 amendment
whereby IBMs 50 percent less one vote ownership
interest has been reflected as a minority interest. In August
2009, we further amended our agreements with IBM in respect of
ALTIS and extended our product purchase agreement with ALTIS
through May 2010.
Manufacturing
Agreement with UMC and TSMC
We have established relationships with semiconductor foundry
partners particularly in Asia, including UMC and TSMC, to
increase our manufacturing capacities, and therefore our
potential revenues, without investing in additional
manufacturing assets. We outsource production to these
foundries, which manufacture the semiconductors that we design.
Foundry partnerships provide us with a number of important
benefits, including the sharing of risks and costs, reductions
in our own capital requirements, and access to additional
production capacities. We seek to make optimal use of
third-party foundries when strategically appropriate.
Joint Venture
with Siemens (Bipolar)
On September 28, 2007, we entered into a long-term joint
venture agreement with Siemens, whereby we contributed all
assets and liabilities of our high power bipolar business
(including licenses, patents, front-end and back-end production
assets) into the newly formed Bipolar business and Siemens
subsequently acquired a 40 percent interest in Bipolar for
37 million. We contributed all assets and liabilities
of our high power bipolar business into Bipolar with economic
effect as of September 30, 2007. The joint venture
agreement grants Siemens certain contractual participating
rights which will inhibit us from exercising control over the
newly formed entity. Accordingly, we account for our
60 percent interest in Bipolar under the equity method of
accounting. The transaction closed on November 30, 2007.
84
New
collaborations announced in the 2009 fiscal year
During the 2009 fiscal year, we also announced a number of
collaborations and partnerships, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
In the security and chip card segment, we entered into new
collaborations with Intel. One agreement concerns the
development of optimized chip solutions for high-density SIM
cards in the 4- to 64-megabit memory capacity range, for which
we are contributing our expertise in security hardware. Pursuant
to a second agreement, we are providing our Trusted Platform
Module professional package software to fully support
Intels TPM1.2 hardware solutions. This package will enable
PC designers to take advantage of a cost effective, flexible and
reliable security solution for Intel vPro technology, Intel
Centrino processor technology and other fundamental business
platforms.
|
|
|
|
We entered into a collaboration agreement with PGP Corporation
to increase and enhance security options. Together, we will
initially provide a combined solution towards Trusted Platform
Module provisioning and management in conjunction with PGP Whole
Disk Encryption.
|
|
|
|
We signed a license agreement for differential power analysis
countermeasures with Cryptography Research.
|
|
|
|
Based on our background in confidential data storage, smart
cards and security controllers, we expanded our cooperation with
the German Federal Ministry of the Interior on certification and
identity documents.
|
|
|
|
We entered into a cooperation with IBM on the technology and
manufacturing of security solutions for the US government,
specifically passports.
|
|
|
|
We expanded our cooperation with IMEC on innovative
design-technology interfaces in future technology nodes.
|
|
|
|
We signed a memorandum of understanding with the European
Commission on its automotive safety initiative. This move adds
momentum to eCall, an integrated, automatic accident alert
system for automobiles. The system collects data from key safety
components and transmits this data to an emergency call center
along with location information supplied by a GPS navigation
module.
|
|
|
|
Our subsidiary, Comneon, and Sonus Networks joined forces in
developing, testing and provisioning advanced consumer-ready
mobile services, including
IP-voice for
mobile networks and Voice Call Continuity (VCC), a
service that allows seamless roaming between operator controlled
mobile and open WiFi networks.
|
|
|
|
In order to strengthen our MEMS based business, we entered into
a cooperation with Hosiden on the development of silicon-based
microphones. Hosiden is contributing its competence in
electro-mechanics and acoustics as well as its market expertise,
while we are providing our rugged microphone MEMS technology.
|
|
|
|
With respect to our CPE business, we entered into a cooperation
with Jungo Ltd. to deliver production-ready carrier-grade
reference designs for the multi-service residential gateway
market. The partnership, currently based upon our ADSL2/2+ and
VDSL solutions, enables customers to offer complete solutions
for operator-specific products based on a pre-integrated,
carrier-ready software platform from Jungo Ltd.
|
85
Acquisitions,
Dispositions and Discontinued Operations
The principal transactions completed in the 2009 fiscal year
were as follows:
Sale of
Infineon Technologies SensoNor AS
On March 4, 2009, we sold the business of our wholly-owned
subsidiary Infineon Technologies SensoNor AS
(SensoNor), including property, plant and equipment,
inventories, and pension liabilities, and transferred employees
to a newly formed company called SensoNor Technologies AS for
cash consideration of 4 million and one share in the
capital of the new company. In addition, we granted a license
for intellectual property and entered into a supply agreement
through December 2011. As a result of this transaction, we
realized losses before tax of 17 million which were
recorded in other operating expense in the 2009 fiscal year. We
have entered into business agreements with the new company to
ensure both a continued supply of the components for our tire
pressure monitoring systems while we transfer production to our
Villach site and the smooth transition of all services and
functions to the new company.
Status of
Qimonda
We currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in the memory
products company Qimonda, which was carved out from Infineon in
2006. In connection with the formation of Qimonda as a separate
legal entity, we and Qimonda entered into a number of agreements
governing the carve-out of the memory products business, the
licensing of intellectual property, the use of our
200-millimeter fabrication facility in Dresden, and support
services in the areas of general support, IT services and
R&D services. On January 23, 2009, Qimonda and its
wholly owned subsidiary Qimonda Dresden GmbH & Co. oHG
filed an application to commence insolvency proceedings, and
formal insolvency proceedings were opened by the court on
April 1, 2009. We reported the results of Qimonda as
discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements
and deconsolidated Qimonda during the second quarter of the 2009
fiscal year. The resolution of Qimondas insolvency
proceedings remains highly uncertain. See Risk
Factors We may face significant liabilities as a
result of the insolvency of Qimonda. For further
details regarding the impact of Qimondas insolvency on our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in the
2009 fiscal year see note 5 to our consolidated financial
statements.
Status of
ALTIS
We and our joint venture partner IBM are currently involved in
ongoing negotiations with strategic and financial partners
regarding a divestiture of our respective shares in ALTIS, the
manufacturing joint venture in France. The outcome of these
negotiations cannot be predicted at this stage. In the event of
a failure to reach an agreement with the potential buyers, we
will have to reassess all options regarding ALTIS. In August
2009, we further amended our agreements with IBM in respect of
ALTIS and extended our product purchase agreement with ALTIS
through May 2010. All currently conceivable scenarios may result
in us incurring material additional costs and charges in
connection with ALTIS. See Risk Factors A
sale or closure of the ALTIS facility may result in us incurring
material additional costs and charges.
Joint Venture
with LS Industrial Systems for molded power module
products
On June 9, 2009, we signed a Joint Venture Agreement with
LS Industrial Systems, South Korea to develop, produce and
market molded power modules for low power applications. We will
provide the joint venture with a license for IP as well as
technology and process know-how for our power module family
CIPOStm
(Control Integrated Power System), and will transfer existing
CIPOS backend manufacturing equipment from Regensburg, Germany.
We will hold 46 percent of the joint venture which will be
headquartered in South Korea.
86
Divestiture of
the Wireline Communications Business
On November 6, 2009 we closed the sale of our Wireline
Communications business to Lantiq. The purchase price amounted
to approximately 243 million. We received a payment
of approximately 223 million from Lantiq on
November 6, 2009, and we will receive a further payment of
up to an additional 20 million from Lantiq in August
2010. The sale and transfer of our Wireline Communications
business to Lantiq comprised fixed assets, inventories,
contracts, customer relationships and intellectual property as
well as certain liabilities exclusively related to the Wireline
Communications business. In addition, we granted Lantiq a
license to certain of our intellectual property. We have further
agreed to provide Lantiq with certain transitional services
during an interim period, including wafers and backend services.
Employees
We employed a total of 26,464 employees as of
September 30, 2009. For a further description of our
workforce by location and function over the past two years, see
Operating and Financial Review
Employees. In connection with the sale of the Wireline
Communications business, approximately 860 employees are to
be transferred to Lantiq.
A significant percentage of our employees, especially in
Germany, are covered by collective bargaining agreements
determining remuneration, working hours and other conditions of
employment. On November 12, 2008, Infineon Technologies AG
terminated its membership in the Association of the Bavarian
Electrical and Metalworking Industries. However, according to
the German Collective Bargaining Agreements Act
(Tarifvertragsgesetz), all collective bargaining
agreements that were in effect on the termination date will
continue to be binding until they expire or are terminated in
accordance with their respective terms.
A significant percentage of our employees are also represented
by works councils. Works councils are employee-elected bodies
established at each location in Germany and also at the
parent-company level (Infineon Technologies AG). Furthermore,
works councils exist at our subsidiaries in Austria and France
(including ALTIS, our joint venture with IBM). In Germany, works
councils have extensive rights to notification and of
co-determination in personnel, social and economic matters.
Under the German Works Constitution Act
(Betriebsverfassungsgesetz), the works councils must be
notified in advance of any proposed employee termination, they
must approve hiring and relocation and similar matters, and they
have a right to codetermine social matters such as work
schedules and rules of conduct. We may also be required to
involve the relevant German works council prior to and in the
context of restructuring measures. Our management believes that
it has a positive relationship with the works councils. The
members of the senior management of Infineon Technologies AG are
represented by a senior management committee
(Sprecherausschuss).
During the last three fiscal years, we have not experienced any
labor disputes resulting in significant work stoppages in
Germany. In June 2009 a work stoppage was organized at ALTIS in
France in connection with the potential risk of closing ALTIS.
The work stoppage lasted from June 15, 2009 until
June 22, 2009.
As part of our IFX10+ cost-reduction program, approximately
10 percent of our worldwide workforce has been terminated
over the past twelve months. Since the primary objective is
to avoid redundancies for operational reasons, and as a first
step towards improving business results as quickly as possible,
we have offered a limited-term, voluntary severance bonus based
on a voluntary severance agreement for German locations except
Dresden. At the same time, we have entered into negotiations
with the central works council on a balancing of interest
procedure (Interessenausgleich) and a social plan
(Sozialplan). The balancing of interest procedure was
concluded on April 28, 2009. A social plan has neither been
negotiated nor concluded.
Furthermore, in light of the present crisis in the financial
markets, and in particular in our sales markets, and in light of
the associated decline in demand in the automotive, industrial,
security and communication sectors, we implemented reduced work
hours arrangements and income-reduction measures at the
beginning of 2009. In Germany and Austria, we introduced reduced
work hours
87
arrangements nationwide for non-exempt and exempt employees.
With certain exceptions, all of our other affected employees
worldwide participated in the Unpaid Leave Program.
Legal
Matters
Litigation and
Investigations
We are the subject of a number of governmental investigations
and civil lawsuits which are described in detail in note 38
to our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in
this annual report.
Provisions and
the Potential Effects of these Lawsuits on our
Business
Provisions related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount can be reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount
of loss is within a range of amounts and no amount within the
range is a better estimate than any other amount, the average
amount is accrued. Under the contribution agreement in
connection with the carve-out of the Qimonda business, Qimonda
is required to indemnify us, in whole or in part, for any claim
(including any related expenses) arising in connection with
liabilities we incur in connection with the antitrust actions
and the securities class action described in notes 5 and 38
to our consolidated financial statements. Due to Qimondas
recent insolvency, however, we expect that Qimonda will not be
able to indemnify us against any such potential liabilities.
As additional information becomes available, the potential
liability related to the matters described in notes 5 and
38 to our consolidated financial statements will be reassessed
and the estimates revised, if necessary. These provisions would
be subject to change in the future based on new developments in
each matter, or changes in circumstances, which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
An adverse final resolution of the investigations or lawsuits
described in notes 5 and 38 to our consolidated financial
statements could result in significant financial liability to,
and other adverse effects on, our company, which would have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows. In each of these matters, we are
continuously evaluating the merits of the respective claims and
defending ourselves vigorously or seeking to arrive at
alternative resolutions in our best interest, as we deem
appropriate. Irrespective of the validity or the successful
assertion of the claims described above, we could incur
significant costs with respect to defending against or settling
such claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are subject to various other lawsuits, legal actions, claims
and proceedings related to products, patents, environmental
matters, and other matters incidental to our businesses. We have
accrued a liability for the estimated costs of adjudication of
various asserted and unasserted claims existing as of the
balance sheet date. Based upon information presently known to
management, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of
such other pending matters will have a material adverse effect
on our financial position, although the final resolution of such
matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or cash flows in the period of settlement.
Environmental
Protection and Sustainable Management
Our Infineon Integrated Management Program for Environment,
Safety and Health (IMPRES) is a framework
integrating our safety, health, and environmental protection
processes, strategy, and objectives, using high standards
globally. IMPRES is certified according to OHSAS 18001 and EN
ISO 14001. The integration of both standards enables synergies
throughout our business. IMPRES is designed to minimize or
eliminate the possible impact of our manufacturing processes on
the environment, our employees and third parties.
Hazardous substances or materials are to a certain extent
necessary in the production of semiconductors. However, most of
our processes are carried out in closed loops and systems that
eliminate the
88
impact of hazardous substances or materials on the health of our
employees and on the environment. We regularly test and monitor
employees whose work may expose them to hazardous substances or
materials, in order to detect any potential health risks and to
take appropriate remedial measures by an early diagnosis. As
part of IMPRES, we train our employees in the proper handling of
hazardous substances. We have introduced a harmonized process
for risk assessment at the relevant sites.
Where we are not able to eliminate entirely adverse
environmental impact, we aim to minimize such impact. For
example, we must utilize perfluorinated compounds
(PFCs) as etching agents in the production of
semiconductors. As early as 1992, we started to install exhaust
air filter systems to reduce PFC emissions. We are a signatory
to the Memorandum of Agreement, a voluntary commitment by the
European Semiconductor Industry which has the goal of reducing,
by 2010, overall PFC emissions by approximately 10 percent
from the emission level of 1995, calculated in
CO2
equivalents. We have signed a similar commitment for Germany,
with a normalized target of 8 percent emission reduction on
the basis of
CO2
equivalents, which is on track. In respect of our European
sites, we achieved our European reduction target by the end of
calendar year 2007.
We believe that we are in substantial compliance with
environmental as well as health and safety laws and regulations.
There is, nevertheless, a risk that we may become the subject of
environmental, health or safety liabilities or litigation.
Environmental, health, and safety claims or the failure to
comply with current or future regulations could result in the
assessment of damages or imposition of fines against us,
suspension of production or a cessation of operations.
Significant financial reserves or additional compliance
expenditures could be required in the future due to changes in
law or new information regarding environmental conditions or
other events, and those expenditures could adversely affect
Infineons business or financial condition. See
Risk Factors Environmental laws and
regulations may expose us to liability and increase our
costs.
National legislation enacted pursuant to EU Directive 2002/96/EC
creates significant obligations regarding the collection,
recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic
equipment. This directive obligates manufacturers to finance the
collection, recovery and disposal of such products at the end of
their life cycle. The
end-of-life
obligations may affect us as supplier to electrical and
electronic equipment producers and as producer of electronic
equipment. Because the directive is currently under revision,
and because a number of statutory definitions and
interpretations remain unclear and are still pending, the
consequences for us cannot currently be determined in detail. As
a result, we are not able as of the date hereof to estimate the
amount of additional costs that we may incur in connection with
this legislation in the future.
Since July 1, 2006, another relevant EU Directive,
2002/95/EC, has restricted the use of lead and other hazardous
substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Because of
this directive, ongoing compliance expenditures could be
required in the future. This EU Directive is currently under
revision, which could result in additional adverse impacts on
our business.
A further EU Directive, 2000/53/EC, restricts the use of
hazardous substances in vehicles. The directive has been changed
and further revision is foreseen. The future impact on us cannot
currently be determined in detail.
EU Directive 2005/32/EC on the eco-design of energy-using
products concerns the ecologically sound development of
electrical and electronic devices. It also provides for the
possibility that manufacturers of components and
sub-assemblies
may be subject to specific information requirements regarding
environmentally relevant product characteristics. Implementing
measures and possible market requirements are not yet fully
defined. As a result, we are not able at this time to estimate
the amount of additional costs that we may incur in connection
with this legislation in the future.
EU Regulation 1907/2006, called REACH, dealing with the
registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of
chemicals, became effective on June 1, 2007. Subsequent
obligations will become effective in stages over the next few
years. This regulation could have a considerable impact not only
on producers and importers of chemical substances, but also on
downstream users like the semiconductor industry. The
89
availability of chemical substances could be significantly
reduced in the European Union, which could have a negative
impact on our production as well as research and development
activities. We are in close contact with our suppliers and
consider ourselves prepared according to the current status of
REACH obligations. However, we cannot exclude the possibility of
significant future costs in connection with this regulation.
The European Commission is considering further restrictions on
the use of PFOS (Perfluorooctane sulfonate) in the EU. PFOS is
an important constituent of key chemicals used in the
semiconductor industry. Any restriction affecting its use may
adversely impact our production and cost position.
The Chinese government restricts the use of lead and other
hazardous substances in electronic products. Because neither all
implementing measures nor the key product catalog are in place,
the consequences for us cannot currently be determined. As a
result, we are not able to estimate the impact, including the
additional costs, in connection with these regulations.
Similar regulations on substance bans are being established in
various countries of the world. We are not able at this time to
estimate the impact, including the amount of additional costs
that we may incur, in connection with these possible regulations.
Because some of our facilities, including some of those of our
joint ventures, are located close to or shared with those of
other companies, we may be subject to certain claims and certain
liabilities relating to environmental issues, such as
contamination, not entirely originating from our own operations.
Because the damage and loss caused by fire, natural hazards,
supply shortage, or other disturbance at a semiconductor
facility or within our supply chain at customers as
well as at suppliers can be severe, we have
constructed and operate our facilities in ways that minimize the
specific risks and that enable a quick response if such an event
should occur. We expect to continue to invest in prevention and
response measures at our facilities.
Real
Estate
We own approximately 1.3 million square meters of land at
Cegled (Hungary), Dresden, Neubiberg, Regensburg and Warstein
(Germany), Essonnes (France) and Villach (Austria).
Furthermore, we own approximately 730,200 square meters of
building space at Batam (Indonesia), Cegled (Hungary), Dresden,
Regensburg and Warstein (Germany), Essonne (France), Kulim and
Malacca (Malaysia), Singapore (Singapore), Villach (Austria) and
Wuxi (PR China).
In addition, we have long-term rental and lease arrangements
covering approximately 953,700 square meters of land at
Batam (Indonesia), Kulim and Malacca (Malaysia), Neubiberg and
Duisburg (Germany), Singapore (Singapore), Wuxi (PR China).
Furthermore we have long-term rental and lease arrangements
covering approximately 319,500 square meters of building
space in various locations in Asia Pacific, Europe and North
America. We believe that these properties are rented or leased
on ordinary market terms and conditions.
90
MANAGEMENT
Supervisory Board
Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership of other Supervisory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boards and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year ended
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
expires
|
|
|
Occupation
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Chairman
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Lawyer
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
SGL Carbon AG, Wiesbaden
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
BASF SE, Ludwigshafen
HeidelbergCement AG, Heidelberg
Schott AG, Mainz (until September 30, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors of
UniCredit S.p.A., Milan, Italy
(until April 29, 2009)
|
Gerd
Schmidt(1)
Deputy Chairman
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Chairman of the Infineon Central Works Council
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Infineon Works Council, Regensburg
|
|
|
Wigand
Cramer(1)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Labor union clerk IG Metall, Berlin
|
|
|
Alfred
Eibl(1)
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Chairman of the Infineon Works Council Munich-Campeon
|
|
|
Peter
Gruber(1)
Representative of Senior Management (since
February 12, 2009)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations Finance, Infineon Technologies
AG
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Infineon Technologies Dresden
GmbH, Dresden
(since December 15, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Partner Delegation of:
Comneon GmbH, Nuremberg
COMNEON Electronic Technology
GmbH, Linz, Austria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors of
ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C.,
Essonnes, France
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon Technologies Savan Ltd.,
Netanya, Israel (inactive)
Infineon Technologies (Kulim) Sdn.
Bhd., Kulim, Malaysia
|
Gerhard
Hobbach(1)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deputy Chairman of the Works Council, Infineon Munich-Campeon
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Managing Director Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach GmbH,
Allensbach
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Allianz SE, Munich
MAN AG, Munich
BMW AG, Munich
|
Dr. Siegfried Luther
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Managing Director of Reinhard Mohn Verwaltungs GmbH,
Gütersloh
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of:
WestLB AG, Duesseldorf/Muenster
Wintershall Holding AG, Kassel
EVONIK Industries AG, Essen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Administration of
RTL Group S.A., Luxembourg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Administration of
Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille
S.A., Loverval, Belgium
|
Dr. Manfred Puffer (since July 30, 2009)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Management Consultant
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership of other Supervisory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boards and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year ended
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
expires
|
|
|
Occupation
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Prof. Dr. rer. nat.
Doris
Schmitt-Landsiedel
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Professor at the Munich Technical University, Munich
|
|
|
Horst
Schuler(1)
(since February 12, 2009)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deputy Chairman of the Infineon Central Works Council
|
|
|
Kerstin
Schulzendorf(1)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Member of the Works Council, Infineon Dresden
|
|
|
Dr. Eckart Sünner
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
President and Chief Compliance Officer of BASF SE, Ludwigshafen
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
K+S AG, Kassel
|
Alexander
Trüby(1)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Member of the Works Council, Infineon Dresden
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Infineon Technologies Dresden
GmbH (since March 31, 2009)
|
Arnaud de Weert
(since February 1, 2009)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
President of Novelis Europe, Novelis AG, Zurich, Switzerland
(until September 30, 2009)
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
Aluminium Norf GmbH, Neuss
Novelis Deutschland GmbH,
Goettingen (until September 30, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Consultant (since October 1, 2009)
|
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Management Consultant
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Deutsche Messe AG, Hanover
(until December 31, 2008)
Leoni AG, Nuremberg
SAP AG, Walldorf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Administration of Siemens Ltd., Seoul, Korea (until January 31, 2009)
|
Former members of the Supervisory Board
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer
(until February 18, 2009)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Consultant
|
|
|
Jakob
Hauser(1)
(until February 12, 2009)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Works Council, Qimonda AG, Munich
|
|
|
Michael
Ruth(1)
Representative of Senior Management (until February 12,
2009)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Vice President Reporting, Planning and Controlling,
Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
Prof. Dr. rer. nat.
Martin Winterkorn (until January 31, 2009)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Management Board of: Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
Audi AG, Ingolstadt
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Salzgitter AG, Salzgitter
FC Bayern München AG, Munich
TÜV Süddeutschland Holding AG, Munich
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member of the Board of Administration of
SEAT S.A., Barcelona, Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of Board of Directors of:
Scania AB, Södertälje, Sweden
|
|
|
(1) |
Employee representative
|
92
The Supervisory Board maintains the following principal
committees:
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
Members
|
|
Executive Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley (Chairman)
Gerd Schmidt
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
Investment, Finance and Audit Committee
|
|
Dr. Siegfried Luther (Chairman)
Max Dietrich Kley
Gerd Schmidt
|
Mediation Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley (Chairman)
Alfred Eibl
Gerd Schmidt
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
Nomination Committee
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher
Dr. Siegfried Luther
Dr. Manfred Puffer
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Doris Schmitt-Landsiedel
Dr. Eckart Sünner
Arnaud de Weert
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
|
Strategy and Technology Committee
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. E.h. Klaus Wucherer
(Chairman)
Wigand Cramer
Alfred Eibl
Gerhard Hobbach
Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Doris Schmitt-Landsiedel
Arnaud de Weert
|
93
Management Board
Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memberships of Supervisory Boards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and comparable governing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies of domestic and foreign
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
|
companies during the fiscal year
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
expires
|
|
Position
|
|
ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Peter Bauer
|
|
49
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
Spokesman of the Management Board, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Member of the Board of Directors of
Infineon Technologies China Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai, Peoples
Republic of China
Infineon Technologies Asia
Pacific Pte., Ltd.,
Singapore
Infineon Technologies North
America Corp.,
Wilmington,
Delaware, USA
Infineon Technologies Japan K.K.,
Tokyo, Japan
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
50
|
|
August 31, 2012
|
|
Member of the Management Board and Executive Vice President
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
7 Layers AG, Ratingen
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Infineon Austria AG, Villach, Austria
(since July 18, 2008)
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
53
|
|
May 31, 2012
|
|
Member of the Management Board and Executive Vice President
|
|
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of
Infineon Technologies Austria
AG, Villach, Austria
Infineon Technologies Dresden
GmbH, Dresden, Germany
(since February 13, 2009)
Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Infineon Technologies (Kulim)
Sdn. Bhd., Kulim,
Malaysia
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Qimonda AG, Munich
|
Dr. Marco Schröter
|
|
46
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
Member of the Management Board, Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Labor Director
|
|
Member of the Supervisory Board of
Infineon Technologies Austria
AG, Villach, Austria
Member of the Board of Directors of
Infineon Technologies Asia
Pacific Pte., Ltd., Singapore
Infineon Technologies China Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai, Peoples Republic of
China
Infineon Technologies North
America Corp., Wilmington,
Delaware, USA
|
Peter Bauer is member of the Management Board and has
been our Chief Executive Officer since June 1, 2008. He has
been a member of the Management Board from our formation in
1999. From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Bauer served as head of our
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket Business Group
and was responsible for the Central Sales Functions. From 1999
until 2004, he served as our Executive Vice President and Chief
Sales and Marketing Officer. He was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Siemens Microelectronics, Inc. from 1998 to
April 1999. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Bauer was President of
Sales and Solution Centers for the Siemens Semiconductor Group.
He began his career with the Siemens Semiconductor Group in 1986
as a development engineer. Mr. Bauer holds a degree in
electrical engineering from the Munich Technical University.
Dr. Marco Schröter is member of the Management
Board, our Chief Financial Officer and Labor Director since
April 1, 2008. From 2002 to 2008 he was a Member of
Management Board and Chief Financial Officer at Schenker AG,
Essen, responsible for accounting, finance, controlling, risk
management and purchasing. From 1994 to 2002,
Dr. Schröter held several management positions,
including Head of Central Controlling, at Stinnes AG, Muehlheim.
Dr. Schröter holds a degree in business administration
and a Ph.D. in economics.
94
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul is member of the Management
Board and is responsible for Sales, Marketing, Technology and
R&D. He was appointed Deputy Executive Vice President of
our Management Board as of August 2005 and subsequently
Executive Vice President as of December 1, 2006. Until 1999
he was General Manager of the Digital TeleCom and Data Com ICs
operations at Siemens. When our company was formed, he took over
the Wireless Baseband and Systems Business Unit as Vice
President and General Manager. From 2001 to 2002, he was
responsible for Security & Chip Card ICs operations as
Chief Executive Officer. In 2003, he was appointed as full
Professor and Faculty Chair for RF-Technology and Radio-Systems
at Hanover University. In 2004, he returned to Infineon where he
first managed the Wireline Communications Business Group as
Senior Vice President and General Manager, and then, following a
reorganization, became President and General Manager of the
Communication Solutions Business Group comprising all of our
communication businesses. Professor Eul studied electrical
engineering and has a doctorate and professorate in engineering.
Dr. Reinhard Ploss is member of the Management Board
and is responsible for Operations. He was appointed Executive
Vice President and Head of Operations effective June 1,
2007. Dr. Ploss joined Siemens in 1986 as a process
engineer. In 1996 he took over the Power Semiconductor business
unit, focusing on development and manufacturing. In 1999, he was
appointed President of eupec GmbH Co. KG. In 2000,
Dr. Ploss became head of the Automotive &
Industrial segment, which at the time consisted of power
semiconductors, electric drives, automotive applications and the
microcontroller business unit. In 2005, he assumed
responsibility for manufacturing, development and operational
management in the Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket
segment. Dr. Ploss studied chemical engineering and has a
doctorate in engineering.
The members of our Management Board, individually or in the
aggregate, do not own, directly or indirectly, more than
1 percent of our outstanding share capital.
The business address of each of the members of our Management
Board is Infineon Technologies AG, Am Campeon 1-12, 85579
Neubiberg, Germany.
Corporate
Governance
Overview of
Corporate Governance Structure
The corporate bodies of our company are the Management Board
(Vorstand), the Supervisory Board (Aufsichtsrat)
and the general shareholders meeting
(Hauptversammlung). The powers vested in these bodies are
governed by the German Stock Corporation Act, the Articles of
Association (Satzung), and, with respect to our
Management Board and our Supervisory Board, their respective
rules of procedure (Geschäftsordnungen). Our
Management Board and our Supervisory Board are separate and no
individual may simultaneously exercise functions or serve as a
member of both boards.
Our Management Board is responsible for managing our business in
accordance with applicable laws, our Articles of Association and
the rules of procedure of the Management Board, taking into
account the resolutions adopted by the general shareholders
meeting. It represents us in our dealings with third parties.
The Management Board is required to ensure the establishment and
operation by our company of an appropriate risk management and
internal monitoring system facilitating the timely
identification of developments that might jeopardize our
continued existence (Sec. 91 (2) of the German Stock
Corporation Act).
Members of the Management Board are appointed by the Supervisory
Board and can be dismissed for good cause. The Supervisory Board
is required to supervise and advise the Management Board in its
management of our company, but is not permitted to make
management decisions. To ensure that these functions are carried
out properly, the Management Board must, among other things,
inform the Supervisory Board on a regular, timely and
comprehensive basis about all issues of relevance to our company
with respect to planning, the course of business, risks and risk
management, as well as strategic measures. In this regard, the
Management Board is also required to describe and explain any
deviations in the course of business from plans and targets that
have been set. Furthermore, the chairman of the
95
Supervisory Board must be informed of any other important
developments. The Management Board must obtain the consent of
the Supervisory Board for certain transactions as determined by
the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board is also entitled to
request special reports at any time.
In carrying out their duties, members of both the Management
Board and Supervisory Board must exercise the standard of care
of a prudent and diligent businessman, and they are liable to us
for damages if they fail to do so. Both boards are required to
take into account a broad range of considerations in their
decisions, including the interests of our company and our
shareholders, employees and creditors. The Management Board is
required to respect the shareholders rights to equal
treatment and equal information. Both the Management Board
members and the Supervisory Board members are jointly and
severally liable vis-à-vis our company for breaches of
their duties if, as a result, we suffer damages.
As a general rule under German law, a shareholder has no direct
recourse against the members of the Management Board or the
Supervisory Board in the event that they are believed to have
breached a duty to our company. Apart from insolvency or other
special circumstances, only our company has the right to claim
damages from members of either board. We may waive these damages
or settle these claims only if at least three years have passed
and if the shareholders approve the waiver or settlement at the
shareholders general meeting with a simple majority,
provided that opposing shareholders do not hold, in the
aggregate, one-tenth or more of the share capital of our company
and do not have their opposition formally noted in the minutes
maintained by a German notary.
Supervisory
Board
Our Supervisory Board currently consists of 16 members. The
shareholders, by a majority of the votes cast in a general
meeting, currently elect eight members and the employees
currently elect the remaining eight members. Among the eight
employee representatives on the Supervisory Board, one member is
from the ranks of the executive employees (Leitende
Angestellte), five members are from the ranks of the
employees (excluding executive employees) and two are
representatives of the trade unions represented in the Infineon
group in Germany. According to German law, the shareholders may
determine the term of each shareholder-elected member of the
Supervisory Board. The maximum term of office of
shareholder-elected Supervisory Board members expires at the end
of shareholders general meeting in which the shareholders
discharge the Supervisory Board members for the fourth fiscal
year after the start of their term as a Supervisory Board
member. The fiscal year in which the term of office begins is
not included in this calculation. Supervisory Board members may
be re-elected. The term of all current shareholder
representatives ends with the annual general meeting to be held
in 2010. The employee representatives on the Supervisory Board
took office on February 12, 2009.
The Supervisory Board is composed of the minimum number of
members required by law. Under the German Co-Determination Act
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz), a company that employs more than
10,000 employees is required to have a supervisory board
comprised of at least 16 members. Companies that employ not more
than 10,000 employees are required to have a supervisory board
comprised of at least 12 members. As the number of employees
working for us or any of our domestic group companies in Germany
has fallen below 10,000, the Management Board initiated
statutory proceedings (Statusverfahren) in July 2009 to
reduce the size of the Supervisory Board to 12 seats.
Consequently, the term of office of all current members of our
Supervisory Board will end and our employees and shareholders
will each elect six new representatives to the Supervisory
Board. We expect such proceedings to be finalized with the
election of the shareholder representatives by the general
shareholders meeting in February 2010.
Any member of the Supervisory Board elected by shareholders may
be removed by a resolution of the general shareholders
meeting if such resolution is approved by a simple majority of
the votes cast. Any member of the Supervisory Board elected by
employees may be removed by three quarters of the votes cast by
the electoral delegates representing the employees and any
member of the Supervisory Board elected by unions may be removed
by the union that nominated the member. In addition, the
Articles of
96
Association provide that all members of the Supervisory Board
may resign at any time, with or without good cause, by providing
four weeks prior written notice to the Supervisory Board
chairman.
The Supervisory Board elects a chairman and a deputy chairman
from among its members. If no candidate is elected by a vote of
two-thirds of the members of the Supervisory Board, the
representatives of the shareholders have the right to elect the
chairman and the representatives of the employees have the right
to elect the deputy chairman. Should the chairman or the deputy
chairman leave office prior to the expiry of his or her term,
the Supervisory Board must without delay elect a successor to
fill the remaining term of the departing chairman or deputy
chairman. The German Accounting Law Modernization Act
(Bilanzrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz) provides that at
least one independent member of the Supervisory Board of
publicly traded companies must have expertise in the fields of
accounting or auditing that is, be an independent
financial expert. On the Supervisory Board, Max Dietrich Kley
and Dr. Siegfried Luther, among others, have the required
financial expertise and independence.
Under mandatory statutory provisions and the Articles of
Association, the Supervisory Board issues rules of procedure for
itself. The Supervisory Boards current rules of procedure
are effective as of November 26, 2009.
The Supervisory Board meets at least once every calendar
quarter. The meetings may also be held in the form of a
telephone or video conference and individual members may
participate in the meeting by way of telephone or video
communication. Unless otherwise required by law or by the
Articles of Association, Supervisory Board resolutions are
passed with a simple majority of votes cast. This applies also
to election and deselection processes (except for the election
of the chairman and the deputy chairman, which require a
two-thirds majority). In the event of an equality of votes, a
new vote will be held in which the chairman of the Supervisory
Board shall have two votes.
The main functions of the Supervisory Board are:
|
|
|
|
|
to monitor our management;
|
|
|
|
to appoint our Management Board and determine the Management
Board members compensation;
|
|
|
|
to approve decisions of our Management Board in relation to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
finance and investment planning, including the budget and the
establishment of limits on indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
any investment or disposition that exceeds 10 percent of
our total investment budget; and
|
|
|
|
the granting of sureties, guarantees and loans to third parties
outside the group, if the amount exceeds 5 percent of the
share capital of our company;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve matters in areas that the Supervisory Board has made
generally subject to its approval; and
|
|
|
|
to approve matters that the Supervisory Board decides on a
case-by-case
basis to make subject to its approval.
|
The Supervisory Board may form committees from among its members
and charge them with the performance of specific tasks. The
committees tasks, authorizations and processes are
determined by the Supervisory Board. Where permissible by law,
important powers of the Supervisory Board may also be
transferred to the committees. The Supervisory Board has
established and maintains the following committees:
Our Supervisory Board has established an Investment, Finance and
Audit Committee, comprising the chairman of the Supervisory
Board and two other members of the Supervisory Board, one of
whom is elected from the shareholder representatives and the
other from the employee representatives on the Supervisory
Board. All members of the Investment, Finance and Audit
Committee are independent under U.S. securities
regulations applicable to our company. The Investment, Finance
and Audit Committee
97
carries out the functions normally carried out by the audit
committee of a U.S. company including, among other duties:
|
|
|
|
|
monitoring our companys financial reporting system and
preparing the decisions of the Supervisory Board regarding
approval of our annual financial statements and the consolidated
financial statements, including review of the financial
statements, combined operating and financial reviews, the
proposed application of earnings and the reports of our auditors;
|
|
|
|
reviewing our interim financial statements that are made public
or otherwise filed with any securities regulatory authority;
|
|
|
|
issuing to our auditors terms of reference for their audit of
our annual financial statements;
|
|
|
|
examining the effectiveness of our compliance, internal control,
internal audit and risk management systems; and
|
|
|
|
approving decisions of our Management Board or a committee
thereof regarding increases of our companys capital
through the issuance of new shares out of authorized or
conditional capital, to the extent they are not issued to
employees as part of a share option plan.
|
The Investment, Finance and Audit Committee also supports the
Supervisory Board in its duty of supervising our business and
may exercise the oversight powers conferred upon the Supervisory
Board by German law for this purpose. Decisions of the
Investment, Finance and Audit Committee require a simple
majority.
The Executive Committee, composed of the Chairman of the
Supervisory Board, the Vice-Chairman, and one shareholder
representative, recommends the appointment and dismissal of
members of the Management Board as well as the resolution of the
Supervisory Board plenum on the Management Board members
compensation and is responsible for the negotiation,
modification and termination of contracts with Management Board
members.
The Mediation Committee, which consists of the Chairman of the
Supervisory Board, the
Vice-Chairman,
one shareholder representative, and one employee representative,
submits proposals to the Supervisory Board in the event that the
Supervisory Board cannot reach the two-thirds majority required
to appoint a Management Board member. The Mediation Committee
was not convened in the 2009 fiscal year.
The Nomination Committee, which consists exclusively of
shareholder representatives of the Supervisory Board, recommends
candidates as future shareholder representatives of the
Supervisory Board.
The Strategy and Technology Committee, which consists of three
shareholder representatives and three employee representatives,
deals with topics concerning our business strategy.
Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries have entered into special
service contracts with the members of the Supervisory Board that
provide for benefits during or upon termination of their board
membership other than as described under
Compensation.
Management
Board
The Supervisory Board determines the number of Management Board
members. According to Section 5 of the Articles of
Association, the Management Board must consist of at least two
members. In accordance with the rules of procedure for the
Management Board, the Supervisory Board may appoint one
Management Board member as the chairman or the speaker of the
Management Board. Our Management Board currently consists of
four members.
Management Board members are appointed by the Supervisory Board
in accordance with the provisions of the German Stock
Corporation Act and the German Codetermination Act
(Mitbestimmungsgesetz) for a maximum term of five years.
Reappointment or extension of the term for up to five years in
each case is permissible. The Supervisory Board may revoke the
appointment of a member of the Management Board
98
prior to the expiry of his term of office for good cause, such
as for gross violation of duties or a vote of no confidence in
the board member by the general shareholders meeting,
unless the vote of no confidence was made on blatantly arbitrary
grounds (Sec. 84 (3) of the German Stock Corporation Act).
The Supervisory Board is also responsible for entering into,
amending and terminating employment agreements with the members
of the Management Board and determining the Management Board
Members compensation.
In accordance with Section 5(2) of the Articles of
Association, our company is represented by two members of the
Management Board or by one Management Board member acting
jointly with an authorized signatory (Prokurist).
Under our Articles of Association and German law, the Management
Board adopts rules of procedure for the conduct of its affairs,
and may amend them at any time. The adoption and amendment of
these rules require the unanimous vote of the Management Board
and the consent of the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board
may, however, decide to adopt rules of procedure for the
Management Board instead.
Our Management Board has adopted rules of procedure, which our
Supervisory Board has approved. The rules of procedure provide,
among other things, that the chairman of the Management Board
must notify the chairman of the Supervisory Board of any pending
matter that is significant. The Supervisory Board may, on a
case-by-case
basis, designate such matter as one requiring Supervisory Board
approval.
The chairman of the Management Board must propose a plan that
allocates responsibilities among the Management Board members
and must obtain the consent of the Supervisory Board without
delay once the Management Board has adopted the plan. This
consent has been obtained.
The rules of procedure provide that decisions of the Management
Board require simple majority, unless statutory law, the
Articles of Association of our company or the rules of procedure
require otherwise. A member of the Management Board may not deal
with, or vote on, matters that relate to proposals, arrangements
or contracts between such member and our company.
Compensation
In compliance with legal requirements and the recommendations of
the German Corporate Governance Code as amended on June 18,
2009, this report provides information on the principles for
determining the compensation of the Management Board and
Supervisory Board of Infineon Technologies AG and the amount of
compensation paid to the individual members of the Management
Board and Supervisory Board.
Compensation of
the Management Board
Compensation
structure
So far, the Supervisory Board plenum was responsible for
resolving the Management Board compensation system while the
compensation of the individual members of the Management Board
was determined by the executive committee of the Supervisory
Board (the Executive Committee). Since the
respective legal provisions became effective, Management Board
compensation is determined and regularly reviewed by the
Supervisory Board plenum at the proposal of the Executive
Committee. The compensation of the members of the Management
Board is intended to reflect our size and global presence, its
economic condition and performance, and the typical level and
structure of the compensation paid to management boards of
comparable companies within Germany and abroad. Additional
factors taken into account are the duties, responsibilities and
the performance of each member of the Management Board as well
as our compensation structure. Their compensation is calculated
to be competitive both nationally and internationally and thus
to provide an incentive for dedicated and successful work within
a dynamic environment. The level of compensation is generally
re-evaluated every two years, taking into account an analysis of
the income paid to executives of comparable companies.
Currently, the compensation structure is reviewed by an
independent external compensation expert.
99
In the 2009 fiscal year, the compensation of the Management
Board comprised the following elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed annual base salary. The
non-performance-related annual base salary is contractually
fixed. It is partly paid in 12 equal monthly installments, and
partly paid as a lump sum at the end of each fiscal year,
referred to below as the Annual Lump Sum.
|
|
|
|
Performance-related compensation. The
annual bonus is dependent on the return on assets, which we
define as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) adjusted for
exceptional effects, in proportion to capital employed. This
ensures that a bonus is earned only if the business develops
positively. The annual bonus is determined by the Supervisory
Board in a two-phase process. In a first step, a target bonus
amount is determined from a table agreed in the service
agreements on the basis of the return on assets. The Supervisory
Board subsequently evaluates the personal performance of each
individual board member over the past fiscal year, and then
determines the actual bonus amount. In addition to the bonus
dependent on the return on assets, Management Board contracts
provide for a possible special bonus awarded in recognition of
special business achievements.
|
|
|
|
Infineon stock options. Management
Board members are eligible to receive stock options under the
2006 Stock Option Plan approved by the Infineon
Shareholders Annual General Meeting (the Annual
General Meeting) on February 16, 2006, as a variable
compensation element with a
long-term
incentive effect and a risk character. Each stock option
guarantees the right to acquire one share at a fixed exercise
price. The options are valid for six years and may be exercised
only after an initial waiting period of three years and not
during specified black-out periods. The Supervisory Board is
responsible for all decisions on granting options to members of
the Management Board. In the 2009 fiscal year, no options were
granted to members of the Management Board. Further details of
the Companys 2006 Stock Option Plan are described in
note 32 to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended September 30, 2009 and are available in full
text on the internet at www.infineon.com.
|
As the 2006 Stock Option Plan expired at the end of the 2009
fiscal year, a new long-term incentive plan is being developed
that will focus on the long-term success of the company.
Compensation
of the Management Board in the 2009 fiscal year
In the 2009 fiscal year, the current members of the Management
Board received total compensation of 3,605,108 (previous
year: 3,309,687, pro rata to the duration of membership on
the Management Board during the fiscal year). The total annual
compensation for all members of the Management Board who were
active in the previous fiscal year amounted to 4,920,006
and included the compensation for Mr. Fischl and
Dr. Ziebart who retired during the 2008 fiscal year. In
view of the economic situation, the members of the Management
Board decided in February 2009 to voluntarily forego part of
their fixed salaries for the 2009 fiscal year (the CEO will
forego 20 percent, the other members of the Management
Board will forego 10 percent). The annual lump sum payment
was reduced accordingly. No performance-related bonuses were
paid for the 2009 fiscal year.
100
The total annual compensation paid in the 2009 fiscal year
(gross without statutory deductions) consisted of the following
elements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performance-related compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Base
Salary(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash
|
Management Board member
|
|
Fiscal year
|
|
installments
|
|
Annual Lump Sum
|
|
Other(2)
|
|
compensation
|
|
Peter Bauer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
35,087
|
|
|
|
1,155,087
|
|
(CEO as of June 1, 2008)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
533,333
|
|
|
|
533,333
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
1,089,614
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
13,590
|
|
|
|
823,590
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|
|
914,457
|
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
10,616
|
|
|
|
640,616
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
20,859
|
|
|
|
720,859
|
|
Dr. Marco Schröter
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
85,815
|
|
|
|
985,815
|
|
(as of April 1, 2008)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
84,757
|
|
|
|
584,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,460,000
|
|
|
|
145,108
|
|
|
|
3,605,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
1,583,333
|
|
|
|
1,583,333
|
|
|
|
143,021
|
|
|
|
3,309,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Each in accordance with the duration of membership on the
Management Board during the respective fiscal year.
|
|
(2)
|
The compensation included under Other comprises
primarily the monetary value of the provision of a company car
and insurance contributions, and, in the case of
Dr. Schröter, the reimbursement of expenses for the
maintenance of double residences.
|
Stock-based
compensation
As in the previous year, no stock options were granted to
members of the Management Board in the 2009 fiscal year. In the
2009 fiscal year, no member of the Management Board exercised
stock options.
Commitments to
the Management Board upon termination of
employment
Allowances and
pension entitlements in the 2009 fiscal year
The current members of the Management Board are contractually
entitled to a fixed pension payment, which increases by
5,000 (and in the case of Mr. Bauer by 10,000)
annually until a maximum amount is attained. In accordance with
IFRS, for the current members of the Management Board, a total
of 786,292 was expensed and added to pension reserves in
the 2009 fiscal year (previous year: 534,275). Upon
termination of membership on the Management Board, pension
entitlements normally begin from age 60 but may be paid
earlier in case of retirement for medical reasons. Our agreement
with Mr. Bauer deviates from this model, and he is entitled
to a pension before age 60 if his contract is not renewed,
provided that there is no good cause for a revocation of the
appointment in accordance with Section 84(3) of the German
Stock Corporation Act. In any case of pension payment before
age 60, however, the income from other employment and
self-employed activities would be set off against up to
50 percent of the respective pension entitlements.
101
The following overview represents the annual pension
entitlements, as of the beginning of retirement, for current
Management Board members on the basis of the entitlements vested
through September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses in
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
connection with
|
|
|
entitlements
|
|
|
|
increase in pension
|
|
|
(annual) as of
|
|
|
|
reserves in
|
|
|
beginning of
|
|
Maximum
|
|
fiscal year 2009
|
Management Board member
|
|
pension period in
|
|
amount in
|
|
(IFRS) in
|
|
Peter Bauer (CEO)
|
|
|
290,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
235,967
|
|
Prof. Dr. Hermann Eul
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
202,178
|
|
Dr. Reinhard Ploss
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
173,184
|
|
Dr. Marco Schröter
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
174,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
925,000
|
|
|
|
1,230,000
|
|
|
|
786,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, our contract with Mr. Bauer provides for a
one-time transitional allowance upon termination of his
employment under certain circumstances, including due to
retirement or another reason. This transitional allowance is
equivalent to one years income, composed of the last 12
basic monthly installments, and a sum amounting to the average
of the bonus sums received over the last three fiscal years
prior to termination. The transitional allowance will not be
paid in the event of termination by a member of the Management
Board not prompted by us, or if we have good cause for the
termination.
Early
termination of employment
The contracts with the members of the Management Board include
change-of-control
clauses: A change of control within the meaning of these clauses
occurs when a third party, individually or in cooperation with
another party, acquires 30 percent of the voting rights in
Infineon as stipulated by Section 30 of the German
Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs-
und Übernahmegesetz-WpHG). The Management Board members
have the right to resign and terminate their contracts within a
period of 12 months after the announcement of such change
of control if the exercise of their office and the fulfillment
of their contract become unacceptable, due, for example, to
considerable restrictions in their areas of responsibility. In
such an event, board members are entitled to a continuation of
their annual target income for the full remaining duration of
their contracts and a minimum of two years. This amount is based
on the annual target income applicable to the resigning member
at the time of his resignation and the variable components
assuming a 6 percent return on our assets. In the event of
a termination by Infineon of the contracts of the Management
Board members within 12 months after the announcement of a
change of control, the Management Board members are entitled to
a continuation of their annual target income for the full
remaining duration of their contracts and a minimum of three
years. The Management Board members pension entitlements
remain unaffected. These rights in the event of a change of
control, however, only exist if there is no serious breach of
duty by the respective Management Board member.
Furthermore, the contract of Dr. Schröter provides for
a transitional allowance equivalent to 30 percent of his
annual base salary. This transitional allowance is paid until
the beginning of the pension payments if Dr. Schröter
leaves our company except for (i) resignation by
Dr. Schröter or (ii) our company having good
cause for a revocation of the appointment in accordance with
Section 84(3) of the German Stock Corporation Act. His
income from other employment and self-employed activities,
however, would be set off against the transitional allowance.
Other than described above, the Management Board contracts do
not generally provide for severance payments in the event of
their early termination.
102
Fringe
benefits and other awards in the 2009 fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
The members of the Management Board received no fringe benefits
besides the elements listed under Other in the
compensation table.
|
|
|
|
We do not provide loans to the members of the Management Board.
|
|
|
|
The members of the Management Board received no compensation or
promise of compensation with regard to their activities on the
Management Board from third parties in the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
We maintain directors and officers group liability
insurance (D&O insurance). The D&O
insurance policy covers personal liability in the event of
claims made against members of the Management Board for
indemnification of losses incurred in the exercise of their
duties. According to the existing contracts with the Management
Board members, the D&O insurance provides for a deductible
of 25 percent of such members fixed annual base salary
(which is compliant with the deductible provisions as outlined
in Section 93(2)3 of the German Stock Corporation Act in
connection with Section 23(1) of the introductory
provisions to the German Stock Corporation Act).
|
|
|
|
We have entered into a restitution agreement with each member of
the Management Board. According to the restitution agreements,
we cover all costs incurred in connection with proceedings
brought against members of the Management Board by courts,
government authorities, regulatory bodies or parliamentary
committees due to the exercise of their duties, to the extent
legally permitted. The agreements do not cover, in particular,
any restitution of costs incurred due to an infringement of
their duties as management board members pursuant to
Section 93(2) of the German Stock Corporation Act.
|
Payments to
former members of the Management Board in the 2009 fiscal
year
Former members of the Management Board received total severance
and pension payments of 1,798,225 (previous year:
916,896) in the 2009 fiscal year.
As of September 30, 2009, pension reserves for former
members of the Management Board amount to 27,034,008
(previous year: 26,566,664).
Compensation of
the Supervisory Board
Compensation
structure
The compensation of the Supervisory Board is determined in the
Articles of Association. It is intended to reflect our size, the
duties and responsibilities of the members of the Supervisory
Board, and our economic condition and performance. The
compensation of the Supervisory Board is governed by
Section 11 of the Articles of Association and comprises two
elements:
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed compensation of 25,000 per year and member.
|
|
|
|
A variable element in the form of 1,500 share
appreciation rights per annum, which are granted and may be
exercised on the same terms as provided for by the Infineon
Stock Option Plan 2006 approved by the Annual General Meeting.
These share appreciation rights, however, do not entitle the
holder to purchase shares but only to a settlement in cash. The
basic principles of our 2006 Stock Option Plan are described in
note 32 to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended September 30, 2009 and are available in full
text on the internet at www.infineon.com.
|
Additional compensation is paid for certain functions on the
Supervisory Board. The chairman of the Supervisory Board
receives an additional 100 percent of the fixed
compensation. Furthermore, each
vice-chairman
and each other member of a Supervisory Board committee, with the
exception of the Nomination Committee and the Mediation
Committee, receives an additional 50 percent of their fixed
compensation.
103
Members of the Supervisory Board, moreover, are reimbursed for
all expenses incurred in connection with their duties, as well
as the value-added tax (VAT), apportioned to their
compensation, to the extent that they can charge for VAT
separately and do so.
Compensation
of the Supervisory Board in the 2009 fiscal year
In the 2009 fiscal year, the members of the Supervisory Board
waived their share appreciation rights. The Supervisory Board
compensation otherwise remained unchanged from the previous
year. The individual current members of the Supervisory Board
received the following cash compensation (excluding
19 percent VAT), in the 2009 fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base compensation
|
|
|
special functions
|
|
|
Total payment
|
|
Supervisory Board member
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
in
|
|
|
Max Dietrich Kley
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Wigand Cramer
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
(1)
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
Alfred Eibl
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Prof. Johannes Feldmayer
|
|
|
10,417
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,417
|
|
Peter Gruber
|
|
|
16,667
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
Jakob Hauser
|
|
|
8,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
4,167
|
(3)
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Gerhard Hobbach
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
(1)
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
Prof. Dr. Renate Köcher
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Dr. Siegfried Luther
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Michael Ruth
|
|
|
8,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,333
|
|
Manfred Puffer
|
|
|
4,167
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
Gerd Schmidt
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Prof. Dr. Doris
Schmitt-Landsiedel
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Horst Schuler
|
|
|
16,667
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
Kerstin Schulzendorf
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Dr. Eckart Sünner
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Alexander Trüby
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
(3)
|
|
|
29,167
|
|
Arnaud de Weert
|
|
|
16,667
|
(6)
|
|
|
8,333
|
(1)
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Prof. Dr. Martin Winterkorn
|
|
|
8,333
|
(4)
|
|
|
4,167
|
(4)
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Wucherer
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
389,584
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
514,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Prorated from appointment on February 12, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
Prorated up to retirement from office on February 18, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
Prorated up to retirement from office on February 12, 2009.
|
|
(4)
|
Prorated up to retirement from office on January 31, 2009.
|
|
(5)
|
Prorated from appointment on July 30, 2009.
|
|
(6)
|
Prorated from appointment on February 1, 2009.
|
Other
We do not provide loans to the members of the Supervisory Board.
We maintain D&O insurance. The insurance covers personal
liability in the event of claims made against members of the
Supervisory Board for indemnification of losses incurred in the
exercise of their duties. Each member of the Supervisory Board
has agreed to an appropriate deductible.
104
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS
The following table shows the beneficial ownership of our
companys share capital by the principal shareholders (each
person or entity that has reported to us, as required by
applicable German law, that it beneficially owns 3 percent
or more of our shares). The percentages stated below refer to
the share capital held on the date of the applicable
notification. On August 5, 2009, the number of our
outstanding shares was increased to a total of 1,072,569,049 and
on August 11, 2009 was further increased to a total of
1,086,742,085. Therefore, the notifications received by us from
shareholders had different respective reference points depending
on the date of the notification and current shareholdings may
differ from the numbers and percentages stated below.
We are not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by any
foreign government.
The members of our Management Board and Supervisory Board, each
as a group, hold less than one percent of our outstanding share
capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage relating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to the number of
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
shares at the date
|
|
Shareholder
|
|
Number
|
|
|
of notification
|
|
|
Dodge &
Cox(1)
|
|
|
106,771,627
|
|
|
|
9.95
|
%
|
Capital
Group(2)
|
|
|
36,995,392
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
Odey Asset
Management
LLP(3)
|
|
|
23,687,180
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Notes
|
|
(1)
|
Based on a notification to Infineon by Dodge & Cox
Investment Managers on August 6, 2009 pursuant to the
requirements of the German Securities Trading Act. As the
notification was received prior to the effectiveness of the
second step of the capital increase completed on August 11,
2009, the number of shares and percentage ownership may vary
after the capital increase. The business address of the
shareholder is 555 California Street, 40th Floor,
San Francisco, California 94104, U.S.A.
|
|
(2)
|
Based on a notification to Infineon by the shareholder on
June 14, 2006 pursuant to the requirements of the German
Securities Trading Act. As the notification was received prior
to the first step of the capital increase completed on
August 5, 2009, the number of shares and percentage
ownership may vary after the capital increase. The business
address of the shareholder is 333 South Hope Street, Los
Angeles, CA
90071-1406,
U.S.A.
|
|
(3)
|
Based on a notification to Infineon by the shareholder on
May 6, 2009 pursuant to the requirements of the German
Securities Trading Act. As the notification was received prior
to the first step of the capital increase completed on
August 5, 2009, the number of shares and percentage
ownership may vary after the capital increase. The business
address of the shareholder is 12 Upper Grosvenor Street, London,
W1K 2ND, UK.
|
The German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz)
requires each person whose shareholding of a listed German
company reaches, exceeds or, after exceeding, falls below
3 percent, 5 percent, 10 percent,
15 percent, 20 percent, 25 percent,
30 percent, 50 percent or 75 percent voting
rights thresholds to notify the corporation and the German
Federal Supervisory Authority for Financial Services in writing
without undue delay, at the latest within four trading days
after they have reached, exceeded or fallen below such a
threshold. In their notification, they must also state the
number of shares they hold.
Other than as disclosed above, we have not been notified by any
party holding 3 percent or more of our shares as of
September 30, 2009.
Major shareholders do not have differing voting rights. Other
than as a result of the capital increase referenced above, there
were no significant changes in the percentage ownership held of
record by major shareholders in the last three fiscal years
To our knowledge, as of September 30, 2009, there were
36,833,316 of our American Depositary Shares outstanding
(representing an equivalent number of our ordinary shares),
which represented approximately 3.4 percent of our issued
and outstanding share capital, and there were 159 holders of
record of our American Depositary Shares.
105
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
In accordance with IFRS, we report related party transactions as
transactions in the normal course of business with associated
companies in which we have the ability to exercise significant
influence over the other partys operations and financial
policies and related persons such as Management and Supervisory
Board members in accordance with the International Accounting
Standard No. 24.
We purchase certain of our raw materials, especially chipsets,
from, and sell certain of our products to, related parties.
Purchases and sales to related parties are generally based on
market prices or manufacturing costs plus a
mark-up.
Qimonda
In connection with the formation of Qimonda as a separate legal
entity, we and Qimonda entered into a number of agreements in
2006 governing the carve-out of the memory products business,
the licensing of intellectual property, the use of our
200-millimeter fabrication facility in Dresden, and support
services in the areas of general support, IT services and
R&D services. Qimonda was carved out as our wholly-owned
subsidiary effective May 1, 2006.
On January 23, 2009, Qimonda and its wholly owned
subsidiary Qimonda Dresden GmbH & Co. oHG filed an
application at the Munich Local Court to commence insolvency
proceedings. As a result of this application, we deconsolidated
Qimonda during the second quarter of the 2009 fiscal year,
Qimonda ceased being a related party in accordance with IFRS and
subsequent transactions between us and Qimonda are no longer
reflected as related party transactions. Transactions between us
and Qimonda subsequent to the deconsolidation are no longer
reflected as related party transactions.
Due to Qimondas insolvency, we expect that Qimonda will
not be able to fulfill its indemnification obligations and
indemnify us against any potential liabilities.
For more information on related party transactions with Qimonda,
please see Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions Related Party Transactions in
the Annual Report on
Form 20-F
filed by Qimonda with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 16, 2007 (file
no. 001-32972).
106
ARTICLES OF
ASSOCIATION
This section summarizes the material rights of holders of the
shares of our company under German law and the material
provisions of the Articles of Association of our company. This
description is only a summary and does not describe everything
that the Articles of Association contain. Copies of the Articles
of Association are publicly available at our website,
www.infineon.com, and from the Commercial Register in Munich,
Germany. An English translation has been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States.
Equity
The issued share capital of our company amounts to
2,173,484,170 divided into 1,086,742,085 individual shares
in registered form with a notional value of 2.00 each.
Since the end of our 2006 fiscal year, changes in our share
capital have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2007 fiscal year, our share capital increased by
4,238,682 as a result of the exercise of
2,119,341 employee stock options. After these exercises our
share capital consisted of 1,499,457,270.
|
|
|
|
During the 2008 fiscal year, our share capital increased by
26,900 as a result of the exercise of 13,450 employee
stock options. After these exercises our share capital consisted
of 1,499,484,170.
|
|
|
|
On August 5, 2009, we increased our share capital by
645,653,928 by issuing 322,826,964 shares resulting
from the Authorized Capital 2007 (registered in the Commercial
Register as Authorized Capital 2007/I) resolved on
February 15, 2007 and part of the Authorized Capital 2009/I
resolved on February 12, 2009. The new shares were offered
to our shareholders for subscription at a ratio of four new
shares for every nine existing shares held. After the execution
of the capital increase, our share capital consisted of
2,145,138,098.
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2009, we further increased our share capital
by 28,346,072 by issuing 14,173,036 shares resulting
from the Authorized Capital 2009/I resolved on February 12,
2009. The new shares were issued to Admiral Participations
(Luxembourg) S.a.r.l. After the execution of the capital
increase, our share capital consisted of 2,173,484,170.
|
Registrar Services GmbH, the transfer agent and registrar of our
company in Germany, registers record holders of shares in the
share register on our behalf pursuant to a transfer agent
agreement. The transfer agent also maintains the register of our
shareholders.
Authorized
Capital
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, a stock
corporations shareholders can authorize the Management
Board to issue shares in a specified aggregate nominal amount of
up to 50 percent of the issued share capital at the time
the resolution is passed. The shareholders authorization
may extend for a period of no more than five years.
The Authorized Capital
II/2004
expired on January 19, 2009. Furthermore, the capital
increases in August 2009 were implemented by utilizing all of
our Authorized Capital 2007 as well as the Authorized Capital
2009/I. Therefore, our Articles of Association currently do not
provide for any authorized capital.
107
Conditional
Capital
Under the German Stock Corporation Act, a stock
corporations shareholders can create conditional capital
of up to 50 percent of the issued share capital at the time
of the resolution. Our conditional capital recorded in the
Commercial Register amounts to 665,335,548. It has been
created through six conditional capital increases.
|
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital I (registered in the Commercial Register as
Conditional Capital 1999/I) pursuant to
Section 4(4) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of up to 34.6 million that may be used
to issue up to 17.3 million new registered shares in
connection with our 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital III (registered in the Commercial
Register as Conditional Capital 2001/I) pursuant to
Section 4(6) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of up to 29 million that may be used
to issue up to 14.5 million new registered shares in
connection with our 2001 and 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plans;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2002 (registered in the Commercial Register
as Conditional Capital 2007/II) pursuant to
Section 4(7) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of up to 152 million that may be used
to issue up to 76 million new registered shares upon
conversion of convertible bonds issued in June 2003;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2007 (registered in the Commercial Register
as Conditional Capital 2007/I) pursuant to
Section 4(5) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of 149.9 million that may be used to
issue up to 74.95 million new registered shares upon
conversion of debt securities, which we may issue at any time
prior to February 14, 2012;*
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2008 (registered in the Commercial Register
as Conditional Capital 2008/I) pursuant to
Section 4(8) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of 149.9 million that may be used to
issue up to 74.95 million new registered shares upon
conversion of debt securities, which we may issue at any time
prior to February 13, 2013;*
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2009/I pursuant to Section 4(9) of the
Articles of Association is an aggregate nominal amount of
149.9 million that may be used to issue up to
74.95 million new registered shares upon conversion of
convertible bonds issued in May 2009.
|
|
|
* |
Due to the issuance of convertible bonds in May 2009, which are
covered by the Conditional Capital 2009/I, other debt securities
to be converted into our shares may no longer be issued under
authorizations existing as of September 30, 2009.
Accordingly, shares may no longer be issued from Conditional
Capitals 2007 and 2008.
|
All of these shares will have dividend rights from the beginning
of the fiscal year in which they are issued.
Subscription
Rights
The German Stock Corporation Act provides that all shareholders
generally have subscription rights with respect to newly issued
shares (as well as newly issued convertible bonds, bonds with
warrants, income bonds and profit participation certificates).
No subscription rights exist with respect to shares resulting
from conditional capital. Subscription rights are generally
freely transferable and may be traded on the stock exchanges
during a specific period prior to the expiration of the
subscription period. Our general shareholders meeting may
exclude subscription rights by a majority of at least
three-quarters
of the issued share capital represented at the meeting approving
the resolution. The articles of association may specify a higher
majority and additional requirements. The Articles of
Association of our company do not contain such specifications.
The exclusion of subscription rights further requires a
justification. The exclusion is justified if our interest in
excluding subscription rights outweighs the interest of
shareholders in the subscription rights being granted. Without
such a justification, subscription rights for the issuance of
new shares may only be excluded if the share capital is being
increased for cash consideration, the amount of the capital
increase does not exceed 10 percent of our existing share
capital and the issue price of the new shares is not
substantially lower than the market price of our shares. In each
case, the decision requires a report by the
108
Management Board that sets forth the justification or the
compliance with the requirements for the 10 percent
exclusion, as the case may be.
Shareholders
Meetings and Voting Rights
Our shareholders vote at general meetings. The general
shareholders meeting can be convened by the Management
Board, the Supervisory Board or, under certain circumstances, by
shareholders whose holdings together make up 5 percent of
the share capital. The Supervisory Board must convene a general
shareholders meeting if this is deemed necessary for the
well-being of our company. The annual general shareholders
meeting must take place within the first eight months of the
fiscal year. The Management Board calls this meeting upon the
receipt of the Supervisory Boards report on the annual
financial statements.
Unless a shorter period is permissible by law, the general
shareholders meeting must be convened at least
30 days before the day by which shareholders must register
for the meeting and be announced in the electronic Federal
Gazette (elektronischer Bundesanzeiger), stating the
agenda. Furthermore, the invitation to the general
shareholders meeting, including the agenda and the
relevant documents, must be made available on the companys
website. According to our Articles of Association, we may
communicate information to shareholders of our company using
electronic media.
A shareholder or group of shareholders holding a minimum of
either 5 percent of the share capital of our company or
shares representing at least 500,000 of our registered
capital may require that additional or modified proposals be
made at our shareholders general meeting.
Shareholders are entitled to participate in the general
shareholders meeting and to exercise their voting rights
if they are entered in our share register and have given
notification of attendance which must be received at least six
days prior to the meeting, not counting the day of notice and
the day of the meeting. Following the deadline for the
registration of attendance at the shareholders general
meeting, the shares are not blocked and may be transferred. In
certain cases, a shareholder can be prevented from exercising
his or her voting rights. This would be the case, for instance,
for resolutions on the waiver or assertion of a claim by our
company against the shareholder. Furthermore, a breach of the
notification requirements with regard to material holdings in
voting rights according to the German securities laws results in
a loss of the rights attached to the shares, including the
voting rights, until the satisfaction of the notification
requirement. In the event of willful or grossly negligent
breaches of the notification requirement, the loss of the rights
continues for six months following the subsequent submission of
the notification. Neither German law nor the Articles of
Association restricts the right of non-resident or foreign
shareholders to hold shares or any voting rights attached to the
shares.
Voting rights may be exercised by proxies. If neither a bank nor
a shareholders association is named as proxy, authority to
attend and vote by proxy must be granted in textual form
(Textform) in accordance with Section 126b German
Civil Code or via the internet as further detailed by the
company. If a proxy is instructed directly, the proxy will be
required to produce documentation of its authority at the
general meeting.
Each share carries one vote at general meetings of the
shareholders. Resolutions are generally passed with a simple
majority of the votes cast. Resolutions that require a capital
majority are passed with a simple majority of the issued
capital, unless statutory law or the Articles of Association of
our company require otherwise. Under the German Stock
Corporation Act, a number of significant resolutions must be
passed by a majority of the votes cast and at least
75 percent of the share capital represented in connection
with the vote taken on that resolution. The majority required
for some of these resolutions may be lowered by the Articles of
Association. The shareholders of our company have lowered the
majority requirements to the extent permitted by law.
Resolutions of fundamental importance that require a majority of
at least 75 percent of the votes cast include, in
particular:
|
|
|
|
|
changing the objects and purposes provision in the Articles of
Association;
|
|
|
|
approving authorized and conditional capital increases;
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
excluding preemptive rights of shareholders to subscribe for new
shares;
|
|
|
|
dissolving the company;
|
|
|
|
merging into, or consolidating with, another stock corporation;
|
|
|
|
transferring all or virtually all of the companys
assets; and
|
|
|
|
changing the companys corporate form.
|
Although our company must notify shareholders of an ordinary or
extraordinary shareholders meeting as described above,
neither the German Stock Corporation Act nor our Articles of
Association fix a minimum quorum requirement. This means that
holders of a minority of our shares could control the outcome of
resolutions not requiring a specified majority of our
outstanding share capital.
Dividend
Rights
Shareholders participate in profit distributions in proportion
to the number of shares they hold.
Under German law, we may declare and pay dividends only from
balance sheet profits as they are shown in our unconsolidated
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
applicable German law. In determining the distributable balance
sheet profits, the Management Board and the Supervisory Board
may allocate to profit reserves up to one half of the annual
surplus remaining after allocations to statutory reserves and
losses carried forward.
The shareholders, in determining the distribution of profits,
may allocate additional amounts to profit reserves and may carry
forward profits in part or in full.
According to the Articles of Association of our company the
shareholders general meeting may also resolve upon a
dividend in kind in addition to or instead of a dividend in cash.
Dividends approved at a shareholders general meeting are
payable on the first stock exchange trading day after that
meeting, unless otherwise decided at the shareholders
general meeting. Where shareholders hold physical certificates,
we will pay dividends to those shareholders who present us or
the paying agent or agents that we may appoint from time to
time, with the appropriate dividend coupon. If a shareholder
holds shares that are entitled to dividends in a clearing
system, the dividends will be paid according to that clearing
systems rules. We will publish notice of dividends paid
and the paying agent or agents that we have appointed in the
electronic Federal Gazette.
Liquidation
Rights
Except in the cases of a liquidation based on insolvency
proceedings or judicial decree, our company may only be
liquidated by a resolution of the general shareholders
meeting, which under the German Stock Corporation Act requires a
majority of at least three-quarters of the share capital
represented when the vote is taken. The articles of association
may specify a higher majority and additional requirements. The
Articles of Association of our company do not contain such
specifications. In this case, the assets remaining after all the
liabilities of the company have been settled will be distributed
among the shareholders proportionally to their holdings of the
share capital, as provided by the German Stock Corporation Act.
Certain requirements for the protection of creditors must be
complied with in this process.
Shareholders
Other Rights and Obligations
Our shareholders have other rights and obligations, for example
the right to participate in the general discussion at the
general shareholders meeting and ask questions of our
management. If shareholders believe that our company has been
harmed by members of the Management Board or Supervisory Board
they can initiate proceedings against those persons under
certain conditions. If a German court determines that members of
the Management Board or Supervisory Board have violated their
obligations towards our company, then they are liable for
damages to our company, but generally not to the shareholders
directly. Such direct claims would be successful under very rare
circumstances, for example
110
upon a finding that the member of the Management Board or the
Supervisory Board has engaged in willful misconduct with the
intention of harming shareholders.
Disclosure
Requirement
The German Securities Trading Act requires each person whose
shareholding of a listed company reaches, exceeds or, after
exceeding, falls below 3 percent, 5 percent,
10 percent, 15 percent, 20 percent,
25 percent, 30 percent, 50 percent or
75 percent voting rights thresholds to notify the
corporation and the German Federal Supervisory Authority for
Financial Services in writing without undue delay, at the latest
within four trading days after they have reached, exceeded or
fallen below such a threshold. In their notification, they must
also state the number of shares they hold. Such holders cannot
exercise any rights associated with those shares until they have
satisfied this disclosure requirement. In the event of willful
or grossly negligent breaches of the notification requirement,
the loss of the rights continues for six months following the
subsequent submission of the notification. In addition, the
German Securities Trading Act contains various rules designed to
ensure the attribution of shares to the person who has effective
control over the exercise of the voting rights attached to those
shares.
Repurchase of
Our Own Shares
We may repurchase our own shares pursuant to the authorization
granted by the shareholders general meeting on
February 12, 2009, or in other very limited circumstances
set out in the German Stock Corporation Act. The authorization
granted by our general shareholders meeting expires on
August 11, 2010. Shareholders may grant a new authorization
at our 2010 shareholders general meeting. According
to the new version of Section 71 of the German Stock
Corporation Act, Shareholders may not grant a share repurchase
authorization lasting for more than five years. The rules in the
German Stock Corporation Act generally limit repurchases to
10 percent of our share capital and resales must be made
either on the stock exchange, in a manner that treats all
shareholders equally or in accordance with the rules that apply
to preemptive rights relating to a capital increase.
Corporate
Purpose of Our Company
Pursuant to Section 2 of the Articles of Association, our
companys corporate purpose is to engage, directly or
indirectly, in the business of researching, developing,
producing and selling electronic devices, electronic systems and
software as well as providing corresponding services.
We are authorized to take all actions and measures which are
directly or indirectly incidental to the accomplishment of our
purposes. This includes the establishment of subsidiaries and
branches in Germany and abroad, and the participation in other
enterprises. We are authorized to buy or sell enterprises,
combine them under single management and conclude enterprise
agreements with such enterprises or restrict ourselves to
managing our participation. We are also authorized to spin off
operations, in whole or part, into affiliated enterprises.
Registration
of Our Company with the Commercial Register
Infineon Technologies AG is a stock corporation
(Aktiengesellschaft) organized under German law. It has
been a publicly traded company since March 2000. It was
established under the name Infineon Technologies AG on
March 7, 1999. Our registered office is in Neubiberg,
Germany. Our headquarters are located at Am Campeon 1-12, 85579
Neubiberg, Germany (telephone: +49-89-234-0). Our company was
entered into the commercial register of Munich, Germany, as a
stock corporation on July 14, 1999 under the number HRB
126492.
Our fiscal year runs from October 1 until September 30 of the
following year.
As a German stock corporation, we are governed by German
corporate law.
111
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Organizational
Structure
Infineon Technologies AG is the parent company of the Infineon
group, with subsidiaries incorporated in jurisdictions
throughout Europe and Asia, as well as in the United States. Our
most significant subsidiaries are set out below. Unless
otherwise indicated, all of the subsidiaries in the Infineon
group are directly or indirectly wholly owned by Infineon
Technologies AG as of September 30, 2009.
Principal
Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate name
|
|
Registered office
|
|
Principal activity
|
|
ALTIS Semiconductor
S.N.C(1)
|
|
Essonnes, France
|
|
Production
|
Comneon GmbH
|
|
Nuremberg, Germany
|
|
Research and Development
|
Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Production, distribution
|
Infineon Technologies Austria AG
|
|
Villach, Austria
|
|
Production and development
|
Infineon Technologies Bipolar GmbH & Co.
KG(2)
|
|
Warstein, Germany
|
|
Production and development
|
Infineon Technologies Center of Competence (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
|
|
Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China
|
|
Research and Development
|
Infineon Technologies China Co. Ltd.
|
|
Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China
|
|
Holding
|
Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies Finance GmbH
|
|
Neubiberg, Germany
|
|
Financial services
|
Infineon Technologies France S.A.S.
|
|
Saint Denis, France
|
|
Distribution and development
|
Infineon Technologies Holding B.V.
|
|
Rotterdam,
The Netherlands
|
|
Holding
|
Infineon Technologies Industrial Power, Inc.
|
|
Delaware, U.S.A.
|
|
Sales
|
Infineon Technologies Investment B.V.
|
|
Rotterdam,
The Netherlands
|
|
Holding
|
Infineon Technologies Japan K.K.
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Distribution
|
Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
|
|
Delaware, U.S.A.
|
|
Research, development and distribution
|
Infineon Technologies (Advanced Logic) Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Kulim) Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Kulim, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
Malacca, Malaysia
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.
|
|
Wuxi, Peoples Republic of China
|
|
Production
|
Infineon Technologies (Xian) Co., Ltd.
|
|
Xian, Peoples Republic of China
|
|
Research and Development
|
Notes
|
|
(1)
|
50 percent interest plus one share held by Infineon.
|
|
(2)
|
60 percent held by Infineon.
|
In addition, we currently hold a 77.5 percent interest in
the memory products company Qimonda, which filed an application
to commence insolvency proceedings on January 23, 2009.
Formal insolvency proceedings were opened in the local registry
court in Munich on April 1, 2009.
Dividend
Policy
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz),
the amount of dividends available for distribution to
shareholders is based on the level of earnings
(Bilanzgewinn) of the ultimate parent, Infineon
Technologies AG, as determined in accordance with HGB, the
German Commercial Code . All dividends must be approved by the
shareholders. The ordinary shareholders meeting held in February
2009 did not authorize a dividend in respect of the 2008
financial year. No earnings are available for distribution as a
dividend for the 2009 fiscal year, since Infineon Technologies
AG on a stand-alone basis as the ultimate parent incurred a
cumulative loss (Bilanzverlust) as of September 30,
2009. Subject to market conditions, we intend to retain future
earnings for investment in the development and expansion of our
business.
112
Significant
Changes
Except as discussed elsewhere in this annual report on
Form 20-F,
no significant change has occurred since the date of the annual
financial statements included in this annual report on
Form 20-F.
Market
Information
General
The principal trading market for our shares is the Frankfurt
Stock Exchange, where our ordinary shares trade under the
trading symbol IFX. Options on the shares trade on the German
options exchange (Eurex Deutschland) and other exchanges. All of
our shares are in registered form. ADSs, each representing one
share, were listed on the New York Stock Exchange and traded
under the symbol IFX until April 24, 2009, the date on
which the voluntary delisting of our ADSs took effect. Our ADSs
are currently traded through a Level I American
depositary receipt facility on the OTCQX International
over-the-counter
market under the symbol IFNNY. The depositary for the ADSs is
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.
Trading on the
Frankfurt Stock Exchange
Our shares have traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since
March 13, 2000. The table below sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low closing sales prices for our
companys shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, as
reported by the Frankfurt Stock Exchange Xetra trading
system(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per share in Euro
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
8.05
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
8.90
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
12.02
|
|
|
|
8.28
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
10.69
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
October 2007 through December 2007
|
|
|
10.69
|
|
|
|
6.82
|
|
January 2008 through March 2008
|
|
|
7.27
|
|
|
|
3.65
|
|
April 2008 through June 2008
|
|
|
6.36
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
July 2008 through September 30, 2008
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
October 2008 through December 2008
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
January 2009 through March 2009
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
April 2009 through June 2009
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
July 2009 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
June 2009
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
August 2009
|
|
|
3.67
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
September 2009
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
October 2009
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
November 2009
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
December
2009(2)
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On July 20, 2009, our shares began trading ex-rights, which
rights related to the right to subscribe for shares in the
rights offering we commenced on such date. The closing sales
prices presented in this table are adjusted to reflect the price
of our shares
ex-rights.
|
|
(2)
|
Up to and including December 4, 2009.
|
113
On December 4, 2009, the closing sales price per share on
the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, as reported by the Xetra trading
system, was 3.31, equivalent to $4.97 per share
(translated at the noon buying rate on November 30, 2009).
Trading on the
New York Stock Exchange and OTCQX International
ADSs representing our shares traded on the New York Stock
Exchange from March 13, 2000 until April 24, 2009, the
date on which the voluntary delisting of our ADSs took effect
and our ADSs started trading on the OTCQX International
over-the-counter
market under the symbol IFNNY. The table below sets forth, for
the periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices for
the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange and OTCQX International,
as
applicable(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per ADS in
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
10.86
|
|
|
|
7.77
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
11.72
|
|
|
|
8.28
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
|
|
10.88
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
15.84
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
October 2007 through December 2007
|
|
|
15.84
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
January 2008 through March 2008
|
|
|
10.98
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
April 2008 through June 2008
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
July 2008 through September 30, 2008
|
|
|
8.31
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
October 2008 through December 2008
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
January 2009 through March 2009
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
April 2009 through June 2009
|
|
|
3.47
|
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
July 2009 through September 30, 2009
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
June 2009
|
|
|
3.47
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
|
August 2009
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
September 2009
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
October 2009
|
|
|
5.95
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
November 2009
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
December
2009(2)
|
|
|
4.93
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On July 20, 2009, our shares began trading ex-rights, which
rights related to the right to subscribe for shares in the
rights offering we commenced on such date. The closing sales
prices presented in this table are adjusted to reflect the price
of our ADSs
ex-rights.
|
|
(2)
|
Up to and including December 4, 2009.
|
On December 4, 2009, the closing sales price per ADS on
OTCQX International was $4.85.
114
Exchange
Rates
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Euro and the
U.S. dollar will affect the U.S. dollar amounts
received by owners of shares or ADSs on conversion of dividends,
if any, paid in Euro on the shares and will affect the
U.S. dollar price of the ADSs on OTCQX International. In
addition, to enable you to ascertain how the trends in our
financial results might have appeared had they been expressed in
U.S. dollars, the table below states the average exchange
rates of U.S. dollars per Euro for the periods shown. The
annual average exchange rate is computed by using the
U.S. dollar/Euro exchange rate on the last business day of
each month during the period indicated. For periods up to
December 31, 2008, the exchange rate used is the Federal
Reserve Bank of New Yorks noon buying rate and, for
periods after December 31, 2008, the exchange rate used is
the Federal Reserve Boards noon buying rate in New York.
Annual average
exchange rates of the U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30,
|
|
Average
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1.2727
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.2364
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.3415
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1.5067
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1.3552
|
|
The table below shows the high and low Federal Reserve
Boards noon buying rates for Euro in U.S. dollars per
Euro for each month from April 2009 through September 2009:
Recent high and
low exchange rates of the U.S. dollar per Euro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
April 2009
|
|
|
1.3458
|
|
|
|
1.2903
|
|
May 2009
|
|
|
1.4126
|
|
|
|
1.3267
|
|
June 2009
|
|
|
1.4270
|
|
|
|
1.3784
|
|
July 2009
|
|
|
1.4279
|
|
|
|
1.3852
|
|
August 2009
|
|
|
1.4416
|
|
|
|
1.4075
|
|
September 2009
|
|
|
1.4795
|
|
|
|
1.4235
|
|
The noon buying rate on September 30, 2009 was 1.00 =
$1.4630, and on November 30, 2009 was 1.00 = $1.5022.
Taxation
German
Taxation
The following is a summary discussion of the material German tax
consequences for shareholders who are not resident in Germany
for income tax purposes and who do not hold shares or ADSs as
business assets of a permanent establishment or fixed base in
Germany (Non-German Shareholders). The discussion
does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the
tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to invest
in or hold our shares or ADSs. The discussion is based on the
tax laws of Germany as in effect on the date of this annual
report, which may be subject to change at short notice and,
within certain limits, possibly also with retroactive effect.
You are advised to consult your tax advisors in relation to the
tax consequences of the acquisition, holding and disposition or
transfer of shares and ADSs and in relation to the procedure
which needs to be observed in the event of a possible reduction
or refund of German withholding taxes. Only these advisors are
in a position to duly consider your specific tax situation.
115
Taxation of
the Company
In Germany, the Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2008 introduced
several changes to the taxation of German business activities,
including a reduction of the combined corporate and trade tax
rate for the company from approximately 37 percent to
approximately 28 percent.
In principle, German corporations are subject to corporate
income tax at a rate of 15 percent (25 percent prior
to 2008). This tax rate applies irrespective of whether profits
are distributed or retained. In addition, a solidarity surcharge
of 5.5 percent is levied on the assessed corporate income
tax liability, so that the combined effective tax burden of
corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge is
15.825 percent (26.375 percent prior to 2008). Certain
foreign source income is exempt from corporate income tax.
Generally, dividends received by us and capital gains realized
by us on the sale of shares in other corporations will also be
exempt from corporate income tax. However, 5 percent of
such dividends and capital gains are considered non-deductible
business expenses.
In addition, German corporations are subject to a profit-based
trade tax, the exact amount of which depends on the municipality
in which the corporation conducts its business. With effect for
fiscal years ending after December 31, 2007, the basic
factor for the calculation of trade tax applicable to
corporations has been reduced from 0.05 to 0.035. As a
compensation, trade tax is no longer a deductible item in
calculating the corporations tax base for corporate income
tax and trade tax purposes.
Tax losses carried forward in respect of German corporate income
tax and trade tax have an indefinite life. According to a
minimum taxation regime applicable as of 2004, not more than
1 million plus 60 percent of the amount
exceeding 1 million of the income of one fiscal year
may be offset against tax losses carried forward.
The Corporate Tax Reform Act of 2008 provides certain rules
regarding the computation of profits, which shall broaden the
tax base for corporate income tax and trade tax. Inter alia, the
deductibility of interest expenses of the company (payable to
shareholders or to third parties) may be limited to
30 percent of the companys taxable income before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization provided that the
net interest expense of the company (interest payable less
interest receivable) exceeds 1 million.
Non-deductible
interest can be carried forward.
Taxation of
Dividends
Tax must be withheld at a rate of 25 percent plus
solidarity surcharge of 5.5 percent (in total
26.375 percent) on dividends paid (if any).
Pursuant to most German tax treaties, including the income tax
treaty between Germany and the United States (the
Treaty), the German withholding tax may not exceed
15 percent of the dividends received by Non-German
Shareholders who are eligible for treaty benefits. The
difference between the withholding tax including solidarity
surcharge that was levied and the maximum rate of withholding
tax permitted by an applicable tax treaty is refunded to the
shareholder by the German Federal Tax Office
(Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, An der Küppe 1,
D-53225 Bonn, Germany) upon application. Forms for a refund
application are available from the German Federal Tax Office and
German embassies and consulates. A further reduction applies
pursuant to most tax treaties if the shareholder is a
corporation which holds a stake of 25 percent or more, and
in some cases (including under the Treaty) of 10 percent or
more, of the registered share capital (or according to some tax
treaties of the votes) of a company.
Withholding
Tax Refund for U.S. Shareholders
U.S. shareholders who are eligible for treaty benefits
under the Treaty (as discussed below in United States
Taxation) are entitled to claim a refund of the portion of
the otherwise applicable 25 percent German withholding tax
and 5.5 percent solidarity surcharge on dividends that
exceeds the applicable Treaty rate (generally 15 percent).
116
For shares or ADSs kept in custody with the Depository
Trust Company in New York or one of its participating
banks, the German tax authorities use a collective procedure for
the refund of German dividend withholding tax and solidarity
surcharge thereon. Under this procedure, the Depository
Trust Company may submit claims for refunds payable to
U.S. shareholders under the Treaty collectively to the
German tax authorities on behalf of these
U.S. shareholders. The German Federal Tax Office will pay
the refund amounts on a preliminary basis to the Depository
Trust Company, which will redistribute these amounts to the
U.S. shareholders according to the regulations governing
the procedure. The Federal Tax Office may review whether the
refund was made in accordance with the law within four years
after making the payment to the Depository Trust Company.
Details of this collective procedure are available from the
Depository Trust Company. This procedure is currently
permitted by German tax authorities but that permission may be
revoked, or the procedure may be amended, at any time in the
future.
Individual claims for refunds may be made on a special German
form, which must be filed with the German Federal Tax Office
(Bundeszentralamt für Steuern, An der Küppe 1,
D-53225 Bonn, Germany) within four years from the end of the
calendar year in which the dividend is received. Copies of the
required forms may be obtained from the German tax authorities
at the same address or from the Embassy of the Federal Republic
of Germany, 4645 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington D.C.
20007-1998.
As part of the individual refund claim, a U.S. shareholder
must submit to the German tax authorities the original
withholding certificate (or a certified copy thereof) issued by
the paying agent documenting the tax withheld and an official
certification of United States tax residency on IRS
Form 6166. IRS Form 6166 generally may be obtained by
filing a properly completed IRS Form 8802 with the Internal
Revenue Service, P.O. Box 71052, Philadelphia, PA
19176-6052.
Requests for certification must include the
U.S. shareholders name, Social Security Number or
Employer Identification Number, the type of U.S. tax return
filed, the tax period for which the certification is requested
and a user fee of $35. An online payment option is also
available. The Internal Revenue Service will send the
certification on IRS Form 6166 to the U.S. shareholder
who then must submit the certification with the claim for refund.
Taxation of
Capital Gains
In case of an acquisition of shares and ADSs prior to
January 1, 2009, capital gains from the disposition of such
shares and ADSs realized by a Non-German shareholder other than
a corporation are subject to German tax only if (i) such
shareholder at any time during the five years preceding the
disposition held directly or indirectly an interest of
1 percent or more in a companys issued share capital;
if the shareholder has acquired the shares or ADSs without
consideration, the previous owners holding period and size
of shareholding will also be taken into account, or
(ii) the shareholder has acquired the shares no earlier
than 12 months before the disposition. After 2008, the
disposition of shares acquired after December 31, 2008 will
be generally subject to German tax.
If the shareholder is an individual, 100 percent of the
capital gain realized will be taxable, but generally at a
uniform tax rate of 25 percent plus solidarity surcharge of
5.5 percent (in total: 26.375 percent). If the
shareholder is a corporation, effectively 5 percent of the
capital gain will generally be taxable. However, most German tax
treaties, including the Treaty, provide that Non-German
shareholders who are beneficiaries under the respective treaty
are generally not subject to German tax even under the
circumstances described in the preceding paragraph.
Special rules may apply to certain companies of the finance or
insurance sector (including pension funds) that are not
protected from German tax under a tax treaty.
Inheritance
and Gift Tax
Under German domestic law, the transfer of shares or ADSs will
be subject to German inheritance or gift tax on a transfer by
reason of death or as a gift if:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
the donor or transferor or the heir, donee or other beneficiary
is resident in Germany at the time of the transfer, or, if a
German citizen, was not continuously outside of Germany and
without German residence for more than five years; or
|
117
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
at the time of the transfer, the shares or ADSs are held by the
decedent or donor as assets of a business for which a permanent
establishment is maintained or a permanent representative is
appointed in Germany; or
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
the decedent or donor has held, alone or together with related
persons, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of a
companys registered share capital at the time of the
transfer.
|
The few presently existing German estate tax treaties (e.g. the
Estate Tax Treaty with the United States) usually provide
that German inheritance or gift tax may only be imposed in cases
(a) and (b) above.
Other
Taxes
There are no transfer, stamp or similar taxes which would apply
to the sale or transfer of the shares or ADSs in Germany. Net
worth tax is no longer levied in Germany.
United States
Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of the material United
States federal tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of shares or ADSs. This summary addresses only
U.S. Holders (as defined below) that hold shares or ADSs as
capital assets for United States federal income tax purposes and
that use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency.
As used in this document, the term U.S. Holder
means a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is for United
States federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, formed
under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the
District of Columbia; or
|
|
|
|
an estate or trust, the income of which is subject to United
States federal income taxation regardless of its source.
|
The tax consequences to a partner in a partnership holding
shares or ADSs will generally depend on the status of the
partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a
partner in a partnership that holds shares or ADSs, you are
urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the specific tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition by the
partnership of shares or ADSs.
The following summary is of a general nature and does not
address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to you
if you are a member of a special class of holders, some of which
may be subject to special rules, such as banks or other
financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated
investment companies, securities brokers-dealers, traders in
securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for security holdings, persons who are
owners of an interest in a partnership or other
pass-through
entity that is a holder of shares or ADSs, tax-exempt entities,
holders owning directly, indirectly or by attribution
10 percent or more of our voting shares, persons holding
shares or ADSs as part of a hedging, straddle, conversion or
constructive sale transaction or other integrated investment,
persons who receive shares or ADSs as compensation, or persons
who are resident in Germany for German tax purposes, hold the
shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of business
through a permanent establishment in Germany, or perform
personal services through a fixed base in Germany.
In addition, this summary does not discuss the tax consequences
of the exchange or other disposition of foreign currency in
connection with the purchase or disposition of shares or ADSs.
This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed
regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions,
as well as on the Treaty, all as currently in effect and all
subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect,
or to different interpretation. There can be no assurance that
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
will not challenge one or more of the tax consequences described
in this summary, and we have not obtained,
118
nor do we intend to obtain, a ruling from the IRS with respect
to the United States federal income tax consequences of the
purchase, ownership or disposition of shares or ADSs. In
addition, this discussion is based in part upon the
representations of the depositary and the assumption that each
obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement
will be performed in accordance with its terms.
In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes and for
purposes of the Treaty, holders of ADSs will be treated as the
owners of our shares represented by those ADSs. Exchanges of
shares for ADSs, and ADSs for shares, generally will not be
subject to United States federal income tax.
Taxation of
Dividends
For United States federal income tax purposes, the gross amount
of cash distributions (including the amount of foreign taxes, if
any, withheld therefrom) paid out of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal
income tax purposes) will be includible in your gross income as
dividend income on the date of receipt. Dividends paid by us
will be treated as foreign source income and will not be
eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed
to corporate shareholders under United States federal income tax
law. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be
treated, for United States federal income tax purposes, first as
a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis
in the shares or ADSs, and thereafter as capital gain. The
amount of any dividend paid in a
non-United
States currency will be equal to the United States dollar value
of the
non-United
States currency on the date of receipt, regardless of whether
you convert the payment into United States dollars. You will
have a tax basis in the
non-United
States currency distributed equal to such United States dollar
amount. Gain or loss, if any, recognized by you on the sale or
disposition of the
non-United
States currency generally will be United States source ordinary
income or loss.
Dividend income is generally taxed as ordinary income. However,
a maximum United States federal income tax rate of
15 percent will apply to qualified dividend
income received by individuals (as well as certain trusts
and estates) in taxable years beginning before January 1,
2011, provided that certain holding period requirements are met.
Qualified dividend income includes dividends paid on
shares of United States corporations as well as dividends
paid on shares of qualified foreign corporations if,
among other things: (i) the shares of the foreign
corporation are readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States; or (ii) the foreign
corporation is eligible with respect to substantially all of its
income for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty
with the United States which contains an exchange of information
program (a qualifying treaty). We believe we are
currently eligible for the benefits of the Treaty, and the IRS
has determined that the Treaty is a qualifying treaty.
Accordingly, we believe that dividends paid by us with respect
to our shares and ADSs should constitute qualified
dividend income for United States federal income tax
purposes, provided that the holding period requirements are
satisfied and none of the other special exceptions applies.
Any foreign tax withheld from a distribution will generally be
treated as a foreign income tax that you may elect to deduct in
computing your United States federal taxable income or, subject
to certain complex conditions and limitations which must be
determined on an individual basis by each U.S. Holder,
credit against your United States federal income tax liability.
The limitations include, among others, rules that may limit
foreign tax credits allowable with respect to specific
categories of income to the United States federal income taxes
otherwise payable with respect to each such category of income.
Dividends paid by us generally will be foreign source income and
will generally constitute passive category income,
but could, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, constitute
general category income for foreign tax credit
purposes.
Taxation of
Sales or Other Taxable Dispositions
Sales or other taxable dispositions by U.S. shareholders of
shares or ADSs generally will give rise to capital gain or loss
equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of
the amount realized on the disposition and the
U.S. shareholders U.S. dollar basis in the
shares or ADSs. Any such capital gain or loss will be a
long-term capital gain or loss, subject to taxation at reduced
rates for non-corporate taxpayers, if the shares or ADSs were
held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses
is subject to limitations.
119
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividends paid in respect of shares or ADSs, and payments of the
proceeds of a sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of
shares or ADSs, paid within the United States or through certain
U.S.-related
financial intermediaries are subject to information reporting
and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder
(i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or
(ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and
certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has
occurred. Holders that are not U.S. persons generally are
not subject to information reporting or backup withholding.
However, such a holder may be required to provide a
certification to establish its
non-U.S. status
in connection with payments received within the United States or
through certain
U.S.-related
financial intermediaries (generally an IRS
Form W-8BEN).
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld as
backup withholding may be credited against a holders
U.S. federal income tax liability. A holder may obtain a
refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for a refund
with the IRS and furnishing any required information.
United States
Gift and Estate Taxes
An individual U.S. Holder generally will be subject to
United States gift and estate taxes with respect to the shares
or ADSs in the same manner and to the same extent as with
respect to other types of personal property.
Exchange Controls
and Limitations Affecting Shareholders
Germany does not currently restrict the movement of capital
between Germany and other countries, except for prohibitions on
the provision of financial aid or capital to certain individuals
and in connection with banned weapons-related transactions to
Belarus, Burma/Myanmar, Iran, Ivory Coast, Democratic Republic
of the Congo, Lebanon, Liberia, Democratic Peoples
Republic of Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Uzbekistan and Zimbabwe.
Germany also imposes certain restrictions on the movement of
capital to Iraq, as well as the provision of financial aid or
capital to the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Similar provisions have
been imposed with regard to certain individuals in order to
support the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for
the Former Yugoslavia. Further information can be found in
German at
http://www.bundesbank.de/finanzsanktionen/finanzsanktionen.php.
For statistical purposes, with some exceptions, every
corporation or individual residing in Germany must report to the
German Central Bank any payment received from or made to a
non-resident corporation or individual if the payment exceeds
12,500 (or the equivalent in a foreign currency).
Additionally, corporations and individuals residing in Germany
must report to the German Central Bank any claims of a resident
corporation or individual against, or liabilities payable to, a
non-resident corporation or individual exceeding an aggregate of
5.0 million (or the equivalent in a foreign currency)
at the end of any calendar month.
Neither German law nor the Articles of Association restrict the
right of non-resident or foreign owners of shares to hold or
vote the shares.
Change of Control
Provisions
Our guaranteed subordinated convertible notes due 2010 that were
issued by our subsidiary Infineon Technologies Holding B.V. and
our guaranteed subordinated convertible notes due 2014 that were
issued by our subsidiary Infineon Technologies Holding B.V. (for
further information see note 27 to our consolidated
financial statements), each contain a change of control clause,
which grants the note holders an early redemption option in the
event of a change of control (as defined).
In addition, some of the cross-license agreements and
development agreements of our company contain change of control
clauses pursuant to which the counterparty is entitled to
terminate the agreement which require the other partys
approval of the change of control.
120
We have also entered into change of control provisions with the
members of the Management Board, which are designed to protect
the members of the Management Board and to contribute to their
independence in the event of a change of control. For further
information see Management
Compensation Compensation of the Management
Board Commitments to the Management Board upon
termination of employment.
Documents on
Display
Our company is subject to the reporting requirements of the
U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). In accordance with these
requirements, we file reports and other information with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials,
including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be
inspected and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549, and at the
SECs regional offices in Chicago, Illinois and
New York, NY. The public may obtain information on the
operation of the SECs Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC in the United States at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains a web site at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports and other information regarding
registrants. Material filed by us with the SEC can also be
inspected at the offices of Deutsche Bank as depositary for our
ordinary shares, at 60 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005.
Controls and
Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of our companys disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2009. Based on
this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2009, our
companys disclosure controls and procedures were
(1) designed to ensure that material information relating
to our company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer
by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report was being prepared, and (2) effective,
in that they provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is also responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, our chief executive and chief
financial officers and effected by our board, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards, and includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of our company;
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of our company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and board
of our company; and
|
|
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
companys assets that could have a material effect on our
financial statements.
|
121
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009.
In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in the Internal Control Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment, management concluded that,
as of September 30, 2009, our internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2009, has been audited by our
independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft. Their report thereon
appears on
page F-2
of this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
Changes in
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
No change in our internal control over financial reporting
occurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any
system of disclosure and internal controls, including the
possibilities of faulty judgments in decision-making, simple
error or mistake, fraud, the circumvention of controls by
individual acts or the collusion of two or more people, or
management override of controls. Accordingly, even an effective
disclosure and internal control system can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to disclosures and financial
statement preparation. Furthermore, because of changes in
conditions, the effectiveness of a disclosure and internal
control system may vary over time.
Audit Committee
Financial Expert
Our Supervisory Board has determined that Mr. Kley and
Dr. Luther are audit committee financial
experts, as such term is defined by the regulations of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued pursuant to
Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and are
independent, as such term is defined in
Rule 10A-3
under the Exchange Act.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics (as a part of our
Business Conduct Guidelines) that applies to all of
our employees worldwide, including our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer within the meaning of Item 16B of
Form 20-F.
These guidelines provide rules and conduct guidelines aimed at
ensuring high ethical standards throughout our organization. You
may obtain a copy of our code of ethics, at no cost, by writing
to us at Infineon Technologies AG, Am Campeon 1-12, D-85579
Neubiberg, Germany, Attention: Legal Department.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Audit Fees. KPMG, our independent auditors,
charged us an aggregate of 5.2 million in the 2008
fiscal year and 1.9 million in the 2009 fiscal year
in connection with professional services rendered for the audit
of our annual consolidated financial statements and of internal
control over financial reporting and services normally provided
by them in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
other compliance engagements. These services consisted of
quarterly review engagements and the annual audit.
Audit-Related Fees. In addition to the amounts
described above, KPMG charged us an aggregate of
1.3 million in the 2008 fiscal year and
1.8 million in the 2009 fiscal year for assurance and
related services in connection with the performance of the audit
of our annual consolidated financial statements. These services
consisted of transaction and accounting advisory services,
comfort letters, IT system audits and services related to the
transition to IFRS.
122
Tax Fees. In addition to the amounts described
above, KPMG charged us an aggregate of less than
0.1 million in the 2008 fiscal year and less than
0.1 million in the 2009 fiscal year for professional
services related primarily to tax compliance.
The above services fall within the scope of audit and permitted
non-audit services within the meaning of section 201 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our Investment, Finance and Audit
Committee has
pre-approved
KPMGs performance of these audit and permitted non-audit
services and set limits on the types of services and the maximum
cost of these services in any fiscal year. KPMG reports to our
Investment, Finance and Audit Committee on a quarterly basis on
the type and extent of non-audit services provided during the
period and compliance with these criteria.
Exemptions from
the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
As permitted by the rules of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, our audit committee includes one member who
is a non-executive employee of our company and who is named to
our Supervisory Board pursuant to the German law on employee
co-determination. We believe that our reliance on this exemption
from the listing standards for audit committees does not
materially adversely affect the ability of our audit committee
to act independently.
Material
Contracts
This section provides a summary of material contracts not in the
ordinary course of business to which we are a party and that
have been entered into during the two immediately preceding
fiscal years. Our joint venture and strategic alliance
agreements set out in
Business Strategic Alliances and Other
Collaborations contain additional information
regarding our material contracts. In addition, please see
Related Party Transactions for a summary of
material contracts with certain of our related parties.
Real Estate
Leasing Contract with MoTo Object CAMPEON GmbH & Co.
KG
On December 23, 2003, we entered into a long-term operating
lease agreement with MoTo Objekt Campeon GmbH & Co. KG
(MoTo) to lease an office complex constructed by
MoTo south of Munich, Germany. The office complex, called
Campeon, enables us to centralize the majority of our
Munich-area employees in one central physical working
environment. MoTo was responsible for the construction, which
was completed in the second half of 2005. We have no obligations
with respect to financing MoTo and have provided no guarantees
related to the construction. We occupied Campeon under an
operating lease arrangement in October 2005 and completed the
gradual move of our employees to this new location in the 2006
fiscal year. The complex was leased for a period of
20 years. After year 15, we have a non-bargain purchase
option to acquire the complex or otherwise continue the lease
for the remaining period of five years. Pursuant to the
agreement, we placed a rental deposit of 75 million
in escrow, which is included in restricted cash as part of the
Other Financial Assets line item on our balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009. Lease payments are subject to limited
adjustment based on specified financial ratios related to us.
The agreement was accounted for as an operating lease, in
accordance with IAS 17 Leases, with monthly lease
payments expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Backstop
Arrangement
In connection with the rights offering launched on July 16,
2009 and completed in August 2009, we and a financial
investor entered into an investment agreement on July 10,
2009 pursuant to which the financial investor agreed, subject to
certain conditions, to subscribe for all unsubscribed shares in
the capital increase. Upon completion of the capital increase,
the financial investor acquired approximately 14 million
new shares, representing approximately 1.3 percent of our
total share capital. Under the investment agreement, if the
financial investor acquired shares representing 25 percent
or less of our outstanding share capital, we were required to
pay the financial investor an amount equal to the sum of (i)
5.5 million plus (ii) an amount of 0.057
per share by which the number of shares acquired by the
financial investor fell short of 25 percent plus one share
of our outstanding share capital. Accordingly, we paid the
123
financial investor approximately 20.2 million under
the investment agreement. For more information regarding the
investment agreement, please see Description of the
Offering Backstop Arrangement in the
Registration Statement on
Form F-3
filed by us with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 16, 2009 (file
no. 333-160601).
Divestiture of
Wireline Communications Business
On July 7, 2009, we entered into an asset purchase
agreement to sell our Wireline Communications business, which
closed on November 6, 2009. See
Business Acquisitions, Dispositions and
Discontinued Operations Divestiture of the Wireline
Communications Business.
124
GLOSSARY
|
|
|
200-millimeter manufacturing, 300-millimeter manufacturing |
|
The size refers to the diameter of the wafers being processed in
a front-end fab. |
|
2G |
|
2G is short for second-generation wireless telephone technology.
Subsequent to the first generation (analog), 2G digital signals
offer improved overall sound quality and numerous data services.
Second generation mobile communications in Europe is also
referred to as GSM. |
|
3G |
|
See UMTS. |
|
x-nanometer technology |
|
The size refers to the structure size of the manufacturing
process used in a front-end fab. |
|
A-GPS |
|
Assisted Global Positioning System. GPS uses a network of
satellites to triangulate a receivers position and provide
latitude and longitude coordinates. Assisted GPS, or A-GPS, is a
technology that uses an assistance server to cut down the time
needed to find the location. |
|
AC/DC, DC/DC |
|
Electrical current appears as alternating current (AC) or as
direct current (DC). In alternating current the movement of
electric charge periodically reverses direction, whereas in
direct current the movement of electric charge is only in one
direction. AC/DC refers to the conversion from alternating
current to direct current. DC/DC refers to the change in voltage
from one direct current to another one. |
|
ADSL, ADSL2, ADSL2+ |
|
Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line. A form of Digital Subscriber
Line (see xDSL) in which the bandwidth available for
downloading data is significantly larger than for uploading
data. This technology is well suited for web browsing and client
server applications as well as for emerging applications such as
video on demand. There are different ADSL standards deployed
differing in the downstream and upstream rates. |
|
analog |
|
A continuous representation of phenomena in terms of points
along a scale, each point merging imperceptibly into the next.
Analog signals vary continuously over a range of values. Real
world phenomena, such as heat and pressure, are analog. See also
digital. |
|
ASIC |
|
Application Specific Integrated Circuit. A logic or mixed-signal
circuit designed for a specific use and for a specific customer. |
|
ASSP |
|
Application Specific Standard Product. A logic or mixed-signal
circuit designed for a specific application market, and sold to
more than one customer, and thus, standard. |
|
Back-end |
|
The packaging, assembly and testing stages of the semiconductor
manufacturing process, which take place after electronic
circuits are imprinted on silicon wafers in the front-end
process. |
|
Baseband IC |
|
The baseband IC is an essential part of a cell phone. It
includes a digital signal processor, a microcontroller, some
on-chip memory, interfaces to several external devices, and
mixed-signal functionality like a coder/decoder for speaker and
microphone. |
|
Bit |
|
A unit of information; a computational quantity (binary pulse)
that can take one of two values, such as true and false or 0 and
1; also the smallest unit of storage sufficient to hold one bit. |
125
|
|
|
Broadband |
|
Any network technology that combines and sorts multiple,
independent network frequencies onto a single cable. Commonly
used to refer to high-bandwidth copper or fiber cables with a
bandwidth of 1 Mbit per second and above. |
|
CAT-iq |
|
Cordless Advanced Technology internet and quality.
CAT-iq was created by the DECT forum, and allows standard
cordless DECT phones to be used for VoIP. It is a technology
made to bring together broadband internet and telephony. This
convergence is also part of the fixed mobile
convergence. |
|
Chip cards |
|
Cards that contain an IC. Frequently used for telephone cards,
debit cards, SIM cards, social cards, identification cards and
Pay-TV cards. |
|
CMOS |
|
Complementary Metal Oxide Substrate technology. A process
technology that uses complementary MOS transistors (NMOS and
PMOS) to make a chip that will consume relatively low power and
permit a high level of integration. |
|
CO |
|
Central Office. A common carrier switching office in which
users lines terminate. The nerve center of a telephone
system. |
|
Contactless chip card |
|
In contrast to contact-based chip cards, contactless chip cards
communicate with the card reader through induction technology.
Contactless cards require only close proximity to an antenna to
complete a transaction. |
|
CODEC |
|
Coder/Decoder. Hardware used to code and decode digital signals. |
|
CPE |
|
Customer Premises Equipment. CPE is telephone or other service
provider equipment that is located on the customers
premises (physical location) rather than on the providers
premises or in between. |
|
DECT |
|
Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications. A standard used
for pan-European digital cordless telephones. |
|
digital |
|
The representation of data by a series of bits or discrete
values such as 0 and 1. See also analog. |
|
Discrete semiconductors |
|
Semiconductor devices that involve only a single device like a
transistor or a diode. |
|
DigRF |
|
A digital interface intended for the cellular market. The DigRF
standard specifies a digital serial interface between the RF
transceiver and the baseband chip, which replaces the analog
interface in previous generation mobile handset architectures. |
|
DSL |
|
See xDSL. |
|
ECC |
|
Error Correction code. An error-correcting code is an algorithm
for expressing a sequence of numbers such that any errors which
are introduced can be detected and corrected (within certain
limitations) based on the remaining numbers. ECC is used in
computer systems for data transfer between the CPU and the
memory as well as in almost any kind of telecommunication
systems. |
|
Embedded DRAM, Embedded flash |
|
A process technology that combines DRAM or flash, respectively,
and logic functions on a single chip. |
126
|
|
|
Ethernet |
|
A protocol for high speed communications, principally used for
LAN networks. |
|
Fab |
|
A semiconductor fabrication facility, in which the front-end
manufacturing process takes place. (see also
Front-end.) |
|
FDD/TDD mode |
|
Refers to the operating mode of wireless communications devices.
Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) means that the transmitter
and receiver operates at different carrier frequencies.
Time-divison duplexing (TDD) is the application of time-division
multiplexing to separate outward and return signals. TDD has a
strong advantage in the case where the asymmetry of the uplink
and downlink data speed is variable. |
|
Flash memory |
|
A type of non-volatile memory that can be erased and
reprogrammed. See NAND. |
|
FlexRay |
|
FlexRay is a new automotive network communications protocol. It
is positioned above CAN (controller area network) and MOST
(media oriented systems transport) in terms of both performance
and price. |
|
Front-end |
|
The wafer processing stage of the semiconductor manufacturing
process, in which electronic circuits are imprinted onto raw
silicon wafers. This is followed by the packaging, assembly and
testing stages, which comprise the back-end process. |
|
Foundry |
|
A semiconductor manufacturer that makes chips for third parties. |
|
Gigabit (Gbit) |
|
Approximately one billion bits; precisely 2 to the power of 30
bits. |
|
GPRS |
|
General Packet Radio Services. A packet based wireless
communication service that promises data rates from 56 up to
114 Kbps and continuous connection to the Internet for
mobile phone and computer users. GPRS is based on GSM
communication. |
|
GSM |
|
Global System for Mobile communication. A digital mobile
telephone system that is the de facto wireless telephone
standard in Europe and widely used in other parts of the world.
GSM digitizes and compresses data, then sends it down a channel
with two other streams of user data, each in its own time slot.
It operates at either the 900 MHz or 1800 MHz
frequency band. |
|
HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA, HSxPA |
|
High-Speed Downlink Packet Access, High-Speed Uplink Packet
Access. HSDPA and HSUPA are 3G (third generation) mobile
telephony communications protocols in the High-Speed Packet
Access (HSPA; sometimes referred to as HSxPA) family, which
allows networks based on Universal Mobile Telecommunications
System (see also UMTS) to have higher data transfer
speeds and capacity. Current HSDPA deployments support down-link
speeds of 1.8 Mbit/s, 3.6 Mbit/s, 7.2 Mbit/s and 14.4 Mbit/s.
HSUPA deployments support up-link speeds of up to 5.76 Mbit/s. |
|
IC |
|
Integrated Circuit. A semiconductor device consisting of many
interconnected transistors and other components like resistors,
capacitors and diodes. |
|
ISDN |
|
Integrated Services Digital Network. A type of online connection
that speeds up data transmission by handling information in a
digital form. |
127
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional modem communications translate a computers
digital data into an analog wave form and send the signal, which
then must be converted back to a digital signal. ISDN can be
thought of as a direct digital connection. |
|
ISO |
|
International Standards Organization. The international
organization responsible for developing and maintaining
worldwide standards for manufacturing, environmental protection,
computers, data communications, and many other fields. |
|
LDMOS |
|
Laterally Diffused MOS transistor. LDMOS transistors are widely
used in RF/microwave power amplifiers for base-stations where
the requirement is for high output power. |
|
LTE |
|
Long-term evolution (LTE) is the last step towards the
4th
generation (4G) of radio technologies designed to increase the
capacity and speed of mobile telephone networks. |
|
MCU |
|
Microcontroller Unit. An MCU is a single chip that contains a
processor, RAM, ROM, clock and I/O control unit. Hundreds of
millions of MCUs are used in myriad devices ranging from
automobiles, to industrial applications and consumer electronics. |
|
Megabit (Mbit) |
|
Approximately one million bits; precisely 2 to the power of 20
bits. |
|
Memory |
|
Any device that can store data in machine-readable format. |
|
Microcontroller |
|
A microprocessor combined with memory and interfaces integrated
on a single circuit and intended to operate as an embedded
system. |
|
Micron (m) |
|
A metric unit of linear measure which equals one millionth of a
meter. A human hair is about 100 microns in diameter. There are
1000 microns in 1 millimeter. |
|
Mixed-signal IC |
|
An integrated circuit that includes both analog and digital
signal processing circuitry on a single semiconductor die.
Typically, mixed-signal chips perform some whole function or
sub-function
in a larger assembly such as the radio subsystem of a cell
phone. They often contain an entire
system-on-a-chip. |
|
MOSFET |
|
Metal-Oxide-Substrate Field Effect Transistor. A traditional
metal-oxide-substrate
(MOS) structure is obtained by depositing a layer of silicon
dioxide
(SiO2;
referred to as oxide) and a layer of metal (polycrystalline
silicon is commonly used instead of metal) on top of the wafer
base material (referred to as substrate). The MOSFET is a device
used to amplify or switch electronic signals. It is by far the
most common field-effect transistor in both digital and analog
circuits. |
|
NAND |
|
NAND flash architecture is one of two flash technologies (the
other being NOR) used in memory cards. It is also used in USB
flash drives and MP3 players, and provides the image storage for
digital cameras. NAND is best suited to flash devices requiring
high capacity data storage. |
|
Nanometer (nm) |
|
A metric unit of linear measure which equals one billionth of a
meter. There are 1000 nanometers in 1 micron. |
|
Non-volatile memory |
|
A memory storage device whose contents are preserved when its
power is off. Most common types are NAND flash and NOR flash. |
128
|
|
|
ODM |
|
Original Device Manufacturer. A company which manufactures a
product which ultimately will be branded by another firm for
sale. |
|
OHSAS |
|
Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series. The discipline
concerned with protecting the safety, health and welfare of
employees, organizations, and others affected by the work they
undertake (such as customers, suppliers, and members of the
public). |
|
PBX |
|
Private Branch eXchange. A telephone exchange that is owned by a
private business, as opposed to one owned by a common carrier or
by a telephone company. |
|
PFC |
|
Perfluorinated Compounds. Compounds derived from hydrocarbons by
replacement of hydrogen atoms by fluorine atoms. |
|
PHY |
|
Physical Layer. A part of the electrical or mechanical interface
to the physical medium. For example, the PHY determines how to
put a stream of bits from the upper (data link) layer on to the
pins for a parallel printer interface or network line card. |
|
RAM |
|
Random access memory. A type of data storage device for which
the order of access to different locations does not affect the
speed of access. This is in contrast to, for example, a magnetic
disk or magnetic tape where it is much quicker to access data
sequentially because accessing a non sequential location
requires physical movement of the storage medium rather than
electronic switching. |
|
REACH |
|
Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals. A
framework for regulation of chemicals in the European Union. |
|
RF transceiver |
|
Radio-frequency transceiver. Radio frequency radiation is a
subset of electromagnetic radiation. A transceiver is a device
that has both a transmitter and a receiver in a single package.
In mobile telecommunications RF transceivers are used to handle
electromagnetic waves with frequencies in the lower Gigahertz
range. |
|
RFID |
|
Radio frequency identification. Systems that read or write data
to RF tags that are present in a radio frequency field projected
from RF reading/writing equipment. Data may be contained in one
or more bits for the purpose of providing identification and
other information relevant to the object to which the tag is
attached. It incorporates the use of electromagnetic or
electrostatic coupling in the radio frequency portion of the
spectrum to communicate to or from a tag through a variety of
modulation schemes. |
|
Semiconductor |
|
Generic name for devices, such as transistors and integrated
circuits, that control the flow of electrical signals. More
generally a material, typically crystalline, that can be altered
to allow electrical current to flow or not flow in a pattern.
The most common semiconductor material for use in integrated
circuits is silicon. |
|
Silicon |
|
A type of semiconducting material used to make a wafer. Silicon
is the most widely used semiconductor material in the
semiconductor industry (other than Germanium) as a base material. |
|
SIM card |
|
Subscriber identification module card. Used in mobile handsets
for subscriber authentication. |
129
|
|
|
SLIC |
|
Subscriber line interface circuit. A circuit in a telephone
company switch to which a customers telephone line is
connected. |
|
SoC |
|
System-on-a-chip.
The packaging of all the necessary electronic circuit and parts
for a system (such as a cell phone or digital
camera) on a single IC. |
|
SRAM |
|
Static RAM. A type of memory that is more expensive and much
faster than DRAM but has much lower power consumption than DRAM.
SRAM are used in cell phones because of low power consumption
and in PCs as a fast first-level memory buffer. |
|
Structure size |
|
A measurement (generally in micron or nanometer) of the width of
the smallest patterned feature on a semiconductor chip. |
|
T/E |
|
T1/E1, T3/E3. A data transmission technology based on copper
wires. Various speed classes are available: T1: 1,544 Mbit/s;
E1: 2,048
Mbit/s; T3:
44,736 Mbit/s; E3: 34,368 Mbit/s. The T standards are prevalent
in NAFTA. The E standards are European standards. |
|
Telematics |
|
The combination of telecommunications and data processing. |
|
UMTS |
|
Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service. A so-called
third-generation (3G), broadband, packet based
transmission of text, digitized voice, video, and multimedia at
data rates up to two megabits per second (Mbps), that is based
on the GSM communication standard. UMTS aims to offer a
consistent set of services to mobile computer and phone users no
matter where they are located in the world. |
|
VDSL |
|
Very high bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line. A form of digital
subscriber line similar to ADSL but providing higher speeds at
reduced distances. See also xDSL. |
|
VoIP |
|
Voice Over Internet Protocol. The routing of voice conversations
over the Internet or any other
IP-based
network. |
|
Wafer |
|
A disk made of a semiconducting material such as silicon,
currently usually either 150-millimeters or 200-millimeters or
300-millimeters in diameter, used to form the substrate of a
chip. A finished wafer may contain several thousand chips. |
|
WDCT |
|
Worldwide Digital Cordless Telecommunications. |
|
WSTS |
|
World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS) is a non-profit
mutual benefit corporation which provides services for the world
semiconductor industry including management of the collection
and publication of trade net shipments and semiconductor
industry forecasts. |
|
xDSL |
|
Digital Subscriber Line (where x represents the type
of technology, e.g. ADSL, VDSL, SHDSL). A family of digital
telecommunications protocols designed to allow high speed data
communication over existing copper telephone lines between
end-users and the telephone company. See also ADSL
and VDSL. |
|
Yield |
|
When used in connection with manufacturing, the ratio of the
number of usable products to the total number of produced
products. |
130
INFINEON
TECHNOLOGIES AG AND SUBSIDIARIES
Prepared in accordance with
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Supervisory Board of Infineon Technologies AG:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Infineon Technologies AG and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, income and expense recognized in
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 2009. We also have audited the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of September 30, 2009 and 2008,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended September 30,
2009, in conformity with IFRS as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board and in conformity with IFRS as
adopted by the European Union. Also in our opinion, the Company
has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by COSO.
Munich, Germany
November 11, 2009
KPMG AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
F-2
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
For the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009
(in millions, except for per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
|
(2,368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
Other operating income
|
|
8
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other operating expense
|
|
8
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
9
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Financial expense
|
|
10
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
19
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
11
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
5
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(2,935
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to
shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG (in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
12
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations
|
|
12
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
(3.38
|
)
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
12
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
(3.61
|
)
|
|
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
|
(1.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
September 30, 2008 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
13
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
14
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Inventories
|
|
15
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other current financial assets
|
|
16
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
17
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
5
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
4,648
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
4,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
18
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
22
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
11
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
20
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Other assets
|
|
21
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
6,982
|
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
27
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
23
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
24
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Other current financial liabilities
|
|
25
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
26
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for
disposal
|
|
5
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
27
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
35
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
11
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Long-term provisions
|
|
24
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
28
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
29
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital
|
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
6,008
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
8,848
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
(5,252
|
)
|
|
|
(5,940
|
)
|
|
|
(8,690
|
)
|
Other components of equity
|
|
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity attributable to shareholders of Infineon
Technologies AG
|
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
6,982
|
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
For the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Actuarial gains (losses) on pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
Net change in fair value of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) recognized directly in equity, net of tax
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(820
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(2,959
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
For the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
( millions)
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
Less: net loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Losses (gains) on sales of current
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Losses (gains) on sales of businesses and interests in
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Losses (gains) on disposals of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Provisions
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest received
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Income tax received (paid)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of intangible assets, and other assets
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, and other
assets
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(925
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
(662
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in related party financial receivables and payables
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Principal repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of ordinary shares
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
Dividend payments to minority interests
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents at end of period classified as
held for disposal
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated
Changes in Equity
For the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009
(in millions of euro, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on
|
|
|
Attributable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
on
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Minority
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Hedge
|
|
|
of Infineon AG
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2006
|
|
|
747,609,294
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
5,947
|
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
5,332
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2,119,341
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
749,728,635
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
6,002
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
5,044
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
6,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,924
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,959
|
)
|
|
|
(820
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
13,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
749,742,085
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
6,008
|
|
|
|
(5,252
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income and expense recognized in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from public offering
|
|
|
337,000,000
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,086,742,085
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
(5,940
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
1.
|
Description of
Business and Basis of Presentation
|
Description of
Business
Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries (collectively,
Infineon or the Company) design,
develop, manufacture and market a broad range of semiconductors
and complete systems solutions used in a wide variety of
microelectronic applications, including computer systems,
telecommunications systems, consumer goods, automotive products,
industrial automation and control systems, and chip card
applications. The Companys products include standard
commodity components, full-custom devices, semi-custom devices
and application-specific components for memory, analog, digital
and mixed-signal applications. The Company has operations,
investments and customers located mainly in Europe, Asia and
North America.
Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) and related interpretations
effective as of September 30, 2009 as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The
consolidated financial statements include all information
required by IFRS, as adopted by the European Union
(EU), as well as the requirements as set forth in
section 315a paragraph 1 of the German Commercial Code
(Handelsgesetzbuch or HGB). The
fiscal year-end for the Company is September 30.
All standards and interpretations issued by the IASB and applied
by the Company in preparing its consolidated financial
statements have been adopted for use in the EU as of the date of
application. These consolidated financial statements also comply
with IFRS as published by the IASB. For preparation of the
consolidated financial statements there are no differences
between IFRS as adopted by the EU and IFRS as published by the
IASB. IFRS as endorsed by the EU and IFRS as published by the
IASB are referred to, collectively, as IFRS in these
consolidated financial statements.
The Management Board of the Company approved the consolidated
financial statements of the Company on November 9, 2009,
for submission to the Companys Supervisory Board.
All amounts herein are shown in Euro (or )
except where otherwise stated. Negative amounts are presented in
parentheses. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009, and the consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for the year then ended are also
presented in U.S. dollars ($), solely for the
convenience of the reader, at the rate of 1 = $1.4630, the
Federal Reserve noon buying rate on September 30, 2009. The
U.S. dollar convenience translation amounts have not been
audited.
F-8
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
followed in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
Basis of
Consolidation
The Infineon group, including entities held for disposal,
consists of the following numbers of entities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounted for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
using the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entities
|
|
|
equity method
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The disposal of 33 consolidated entities during the 2009 fiscal
year primarily reflected the deconsolidation of Qimonda (see
note 5).
Consolidated
Subsidiaries
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries that
are directly or indirectly controlled on a consolidated basis.
Control is the power to govern the financial and operating
policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its
activities and is generally conveyed by ownership of the
majority of voting rights. The existence and effect of potential
voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are
considered when assessing whether the Company controls another
entity. Additionally, the Company consolidates special purpose
entities (SPEs) pursuant to the Standing
Interpretations Committee (SIC) Interpretation
SIC-12 Consolidation Special Purpose
Entities where the substance of the relationship
indicates that the Company controls the SPE.
The effects of all significant intercompany transactions are
eliminated.
The Company deconsolidates a subsidiary when it loses the right
to control the financial and operating policies of such entity
and no longer benefits from such entitys activities, e.g.,
through a sale of all or a portion of the shares of a
subsidiary. Furthermore, the Company could lose control of an
entity that is subject to insolvency proceedings.
Equity Method
Investments
The Company uses the equity method to account for its investment
in Associated Companies and Joint Ventures (as defined below)
(collectively, Equity Method Investments; see
note 19):
An Associated Company is an entity in which the
Company has significant influence, but not a controlling
interest, over the operating and financial management policy
decisions of the entity. Associated Companies are accounted for
using the equity method. Significant influence is generally
presumed when the Company holds between 20 percent and
50 percent of the voting rights.
F-9
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
A Joint Venture is a contractual arrangement whereby
two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is
subject to joint control. Interests in jointly controlled
entities are accounted for using the equity method.
Under the equity method of accounting, the Companys
investments in Associated Companies and Joint Ventures are
initially recorded at cost, and subsequently increased (or
decreased) to reflect both the Companys pro-rata share of
the post-acquisition net income (loss) of the Equity Method
Investment and other movements included directly in the Equity
Method Investments equity. Goodwill arising from the
acquisition of an Equity Method Investment is included in its
carrying value (net of any accumulated impairment loss). Equity
method losses in excess of the Companys carrying value of
the investment in the entity are charged against other assets
held by the Company related to the investee. If those assets are
written down to zero, a determination is made whether to report
additional losses based on the Companys obligation to fund
such losses.
The effects of all significant transactions between the Company
and its Equity Method Investments are eliminated to the extent
of the Companys interest in the Equity Method Investments.
When Equity Method Investments fiscal year-ends differ by
not more than three months from the Companys fiscal
year-end, the Companys share of the profit or loss of the
Equity Method Investment is recorded on a lag.
Gains or losses arising from the issuances of shares by Equity
Method Investments, due to changes in the Companys
proportionate share of the value of the issuers equity,
are recognized in profit and loss.
Other equity investments, in which the Company has an ownership
interest of less than 20 percent, are recorded at cost if a
fair value cannot be reliably measured.
Reporting and
Foreign Currency
The currency of the primary economic environment in which the
Company operates, that is its functional currency, is the Euro.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented
in Euro, which is the Companys reporting currency.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional
currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from
the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at
year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations.
The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries with
functional currencies other than the Euro are translated using
period-end exchange rates. The revenues and expenses of such
subsidiaries are translated using average exchange rates during
the period in cases where exchange rates do not fluctuate
significantly. Exchange differences arising from the translation
of assets and liabilities in comparison with the translations
reported in the previous periods are included in income and
expense recognized in equity and reported as a separate
component of equity.
F-10
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The exchange rates of the primary currencies (1.00 quoted
into currencies specified below) used in the preparation of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual average
|
|
|
Exchange rate
|
|
exchange rate
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
Currency:
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
1.4349
|
|
|
|
1.4549
|
|
|
|
1.5052
|
|
|
|
1.3593
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
152.3000
|
|
|
|
130.9100
|
|
|
|
161.6773
|
|
|
|
128.8580
|
|
Segment
Reporting
IFRS 8, Operating Segments requires an entity
to report financial and descriptive information about its
reportable segments. Reportable segments are operating segments
or aggregations of operating segments that meet specified
criteria. Operating segments are components of an entity for
which separate financial information is available that is
evaluated regularly by the entitys Chief Operating
Decision Maker (CODM) in making decisions about how
to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Generally,
financial information is required to be reported on the same
basis as it is used internally for evaluating operating segment
performance and deciding how to allocate resources to operating
segments. Each of the segments has a segment manager reporting
directly to the Companys Management Board, who has been
identified as the relevant CODM.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received
or receivable for the sale of goods and services in the ordinary
course of the Companys activities.
Revenue
The Company generates revenues from the sale of its
semiconductor products and systems solutions. The Companys
semiconductor products include a wide array of chips and
components used in electronic applications ranging from wireless
communication systems, to chip cards, automotive electronics,
and industrial applications. In addition, the Company generates
a small portion of its revenues from granting licenses for its
intellectual property to third parties. Infineon generates an
insignificant amount of its revenue from development or product
enhancement arrangements and services.
Revenues from products sold are recognized in accordance with
IAS 18, Revenue, when the conditions for
revenue recognition are met, which in particular require that
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, the risks and rewards
of ownership have been transferred to the customer, the amount
of revenue can be measured reliably, and collection of the
related receivable is reasonably assured.
The Company recognizes revenue on sales to distributors using
the sell in method (i.e. when product is sold to the
distributor) rather than the sell through method
(i.e. when the product is sold by the distributor to the end
user). In accordance with established business practice in the
semiconductor industry, distributors can apply for price
protection. Under price protection, a credit may be provided to
the distributor if the Company lowers its price on products held
in the distributors inventory. In addition, a distributor
can apply for a ship & debit credit when the
distributor wishes to reduce the sales price to an end customer
on a specific sales transaction. The authorization of the
distributors refund remains fully within the control of
the Company. The Company calculates the provision for price
protection in the same period the related revenue is recorded
based on historical price trends and sales rebates, analysis of
credit memo data, specific information contained in the price
protection agreement, and other factors known at the time. The
historical price trend is determined based on the difference
between the invoiced price and the
F-11
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
standard list price to the distributor. The outstanding
inventory period, the visibility into the standard inventory
pricing for standard products, and the long distributor pricing
history enables the Company to reliably estimate price
protection provisions. The Company monitors potential price
adjustments on an ongoing basis.
In addition, distributors can, in certain cases, also apply for
stock rotation and scrap allowances. Allowances for stock
rotation returns are accrued based on expected stock rotation as
per the contractual agreement. Distributor scrap allowances are
accrued based on the contractual agreement and, upon
authorization of the claim, reimbursed up to a certain maximum
of the average inventory value. Historically, actual returns
under such return provisions have been insignificant. The
Company monitors such product returns on an ongoing basis.
In some cases, rebate programs are offered to specific customers
or distributors whereby the customer or distributor may apply
for a rebate upon achievement of a defined sales volume.
Distributors are also partially compensated for commonly defined
cooperative advertising on a
case-by-case
basis.
Other returns are permitted only for quality-related reasons in
the normal course of business within the applicable warranty
period. These warranties represent guarantees made by Infineon
that the products sold will perform as specified. The Company
records a provision for warranty costs as a charge to cost of
sales, based on historical experience and any other warranty
costs that are known.
License
Income
License income is recognized when earned and realizable (see
note 6). Lump sum payments received are generally
non-refundable and are deferred where applicable and recognized
over the period in which the Company is obliged to provide
additional service.
In accordance with IAS 18, revenues from contracts with multiple
elements are recognized as each element is earned based on the
relative fair value of each element and when there are no
undelivered elements that are essential to the functionality of
the delivered elements and when the amount is not contingent
upon delivery of the undelivered elements. Arrangements with
multiple elements are infrequent and related revenues are
insignificant.
Royalties are recognized as earned.
Research and
Development Costs
Costs of research activities undertaken with the prospect of
gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding
are expensed as incurred.
Costs for development activities, the results of which are
applied to a plan or design for the production of new or
substantially improved products and processes, are capitalized
if development costs can be measured reliably, the product or
process is technically and commercially feasible, future
economic benefits are probable, and the Company intends, and has
sufficient resources, to complete development and use or sell
the asset. The costs capitalized include the cost of materials,
direct labor and directly attributable general overhead
expenditure that serves to prepare the asset for use. Such
capitalized costs are presented as internally generated
intangible assets within goodwill and other intangible assets
(see note 22). Development costs which do not fulfill the
criteria for capitalization are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized development costs are stated at cost less
accumulated amortization and, if applicable, impairment charges.
Internally generated intangible assets are amortized as part of
cost of sales over a period of three to five years.
F-12
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Grants
Grants for capital expenditures include both tax-free government
grants and taxable grants for investments in property, plant and
equipment. The recognition of the grant starts when it is
reasonably assured that the Company will comply with the
conditions attached to the grant and when it is reasonably
assured that the grant will be received. Tax-free government
grants are deferred and recognized over the remaining useful
life of the related asset. Taxable grants are deducted from the
acquisition costs of the related asset and thereby reduce
depreciation expense in future periods. Grants that are related
to expenditures included in profit or loss are presented as a
reduction of the related expense in the consolidated statements
of operations (see note 7).
Share-based
Compensation
The Company has equity-settled share-based compensation plans.
The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for
share option awards is recognized as an expense. The total
amount to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by
reference to the fair value of the share option awards granted,
excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions.
Non-market
vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number
of share option awards that are expected to vest. At each
balance sheet date, the Company revises its estimate of the
number of share option awards that are expected to vest. The
Company recognizes the impact of the revision to original
estimates in the consolidated statement of operations, with a
corresponding adjustment to equity.
The proceeds received net of any directly attributable
transaction costs are credited to ordinary share capital and
additional paid-in capital when the share options are exercised.
Financial
Instruments
According to IAS 32, Financial Instruments:
Presentation, a financial instrument is defined as any
contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and
a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
Financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value.
Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition or
issuance of financial instruments are only recognized in
determining the carrying amount if the financial instruments are
not measured at fair value through profit or loss. Financial
assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows
from the investments have expired or have been transferred and
the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards
of ownership. Financial liabilities are derecognized when
they are extinguished, that is when the obligation specified in
the respective contract is discharged, cancelled, or expires.
Financial
Assets
The Company classifies financial assets in the following
categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and
receivables, and
available-for-sale.
The classification depends on the purpose for which the
financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the
classification of its financial instruments at initial
recognition.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are
financial assets held for trading or designated upon initial
recognition. A financial asset is classified in this category if
acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short
term.
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with
fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active
market. They are included in current assets, except for
maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet
date. These are classified as non-current assets. The
Companys loans
F-13
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
and receivables comprise cash and cash equivalents and trade and
other receivables in the consolidated balance sheet. Loans and
receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective
interest method.
Cash and cash equivalents represent cash, deposits and liquid
short-term investments with original maturities of three months
or less.
Trade and other receivables are measured at fair value at
initial recognition. Trade and other receivables are subject to
impairment testing. They are considered impaired when there is
objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect
all amounts due according to the original terms of the
receivables.
Available-for-sale
financial assets are non-derivative financial instruments that
are designated in this category or not classified in any of the
other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless
management intends to dispose of the investment within
12 months of the balance sheet date. The Companys
available-for-sale
financial assets comprise mainly marketable securities.
Available-for-sale
financial assets and financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value.
Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of
available-for-sale
financial assets are recognized directly in equity with the
exception of impairment losses, which are recognized in profit
or loss. When financial assets classified as
available-for-sale
are sold or impaired, the accumulated fair value adjustments
recognized in equity are included in profit or loss.
The Company assesses declines in fair value at each balance
sheet date to determine whether there is objective evidence that
a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. In
the case of
available-for-sale
financial assets, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair
value of the financial asset below its cost is considered as an
indicator that the assets are impaired. If any such evidence
exists for
available-for-sale
financial assets, the cumulative loss that had been recognized
directly in equity measured as the difference
between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less
any impairment loss on that financial asset previously
recognized in profit or loss is removed from equity
and recognized in profit or loss.
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized
on the settlement date. The settlement date is the date that an
asset is delivered to or by the Company.
Financial
Liabilities
Generally, the Company classifies its financial liabilities into
two categories: at fair value through profit and loss and other
financial liabilities.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are
financial liabilities held for trading or designated upon
initial recognition. The Companys only financial
liabilities that are measured at fair value through profit or
loss are derivative financial instruments with a negative fair
value as of the balance sheet date.
All other financial liabilities, including trade and other
payables and debt instruments, are measured at amortized cost
using the effective interest method.
Derivative
financial instruments
The Company operates internationally, giving rise to exposure to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses
financial instruments, including derivatives such as foreign
currency forward and option contracts as well as interest rate
swap agreements, to reduce this risk based on the net exposure
to the respective currency.
F-14
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Derivative financial instruments are categorized as held for
trading and measured at fair value unless they are designated as
hedges. The Company designates certain derivative financial
instruments as hedges of a foreign currency risk associated with
highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges).
Derivative financial instruments are recorded at their fair
value and included in other current financial assets or other
current financial liabilities. Changes in fair value of
undesignated derivative financial instruments that relate to
operations are recorded as part of cost of sales, while
undesignated derivative financial instruments relating to
financing activities are recorded in financial income or
financial expense.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivative
financial instruments that are designated and qualify as cash
flow hedges is recognized in equity. The gain or loss relating
to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in profit
or loss. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled in profit or
loss in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss
(that is when the forecasted transaction that is hedged takes
place).
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no
longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative
gain or loss existing at that time remains in equity and is
recognized when the forecasted transaction is ultimately
recognized in profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no
longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was
reported in equity is immediately transferred to profit or loss.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of acquisition or production
cost or net realizable value. Cost being determined on the basis
of an average cost method. Production cost consists of purchased
component costs and manufacturing costs, which comprise direct
material and labor and applicable manufacturing overheads,
including depreciation charges. Net realizable value is the
estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less
the estimated costs of completion and estimated costs necessary
to make the sale.
Current and
Deferred Income Taxes
The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the
tax laws enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries in
which the Company operates and generates taxable income.
Deferred taxes are determined in accordance with IAS 12,
Income Taxes, according to which future tax
benefits and liabilities are recognized for temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets or
liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and their
tax base. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for
if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability
in a transaction other than a business combination that at the
time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable
profit nor loss. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
measured using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or
substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are expected
to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized
or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Anticipated tax savings from the use of tax loss carry-forwards
expected to be recoverable in future periods are capitalized.
Deferred tax assets in respect of deductible temporary
differences and tax loss carry-forwards exceeding the deferred
tax liabilities in respect of taxable temporary differences are
recognized only to the extent that it is probable that taxable
profit will be available against which the deductible temporary
differences can be utilized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are not discounted.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are netted if
these income tax assets and liabilities concern the same tax
authority and refer to the same tax subject or a group of
different tax subjects that are jointly assessed for income tax
purposes.
F-15
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Discontinued
Operations
Discontinued operations are reported when a component of an
entity either has been disposed of, or is classified as held for
sale, and (a) represents a separate major line of business
or geographical area of operations, (b) is part of a single
coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business
or geographical area of operations or (c) is a subsidiary
acquired exclusively with a view to resale. Discontinued
operations are presented in separate lines in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations and consolidated
statements of cash flows. These statements have been recast for
prior periods so that the disclosures relate to all operations
that have been classified as discontinued operations as of
September 30, 2009.
Assets
classified as held for disposal and liabilities associated with
assets classified as held for disposal
Assets classified as held for sale comprise noncurrent assets
and disposal groups (net of any related liabilities), the
carrying amounts of which will be realized primarily by way of a
highly probable divestment transaction within the next twelve
months or an already executed divestment transaction, and not
through continued use. Such assets are recognized at the balance
sheet date at the lower of the carrying amount and the fair
value less costs to sell.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are valued at cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment. Spare parts,
maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Construction
in progress includes advance payments for construction of fixed
assets. Land and construction in progress are not depreciated.
The cost of construction of certain long-term assets includes
capitalized interest, which is amortized over the estimated
useful life of the related asset. No interest was capitalized in
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10-25
|
|
Technical equipment and machinery
|
|
|
3-10
|
|
Other plant and office equipment
|
|
|
1-10
|
|
Leases
The Company is a lessee of property, plant and equipment. All
leases where the Company is lessee that meet certain specified
criteria intended to represent situations where the substantive
risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the
lessee are accounted for as finance leases pursuant to IAS 17,
Leases. All other leases are accounted for as
operating leases.
Recoverability
of Non-Financial Assets
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of the cost of a business combination
over the acquirers interest in the net fair value of the
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of
the acquiree at the date of acquisition. Goodwill arising from
acquisitions of subsidiaries is included in goodwill and other
intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Goodwill arising from acquisitions of Associated
Companies is included in investments accounted for using the
equity method and is tested for impairment as part of the
overall balance. Intangible assets acquired in a business
combination are recognized and reported apart from goodwill.
F-16
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Goodwill is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment
annually in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year as well as
whenever there are events or changes in circumstances
(triggering events) which suggest that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Goodwill is carried at cost less
any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill acquired in a
business combination is allocated to the cash-generating units
(CGU) that are expected to benefit from the
synergies of the combination. Infineons CGUs represent the
lowest level at which the goodwill is monitored for internal
management purposes. This level is beneath the segment level and
represents the smallest group of assets that generate cash
inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the
cash inflows of other assets or groups thereof. If the carrying
amount of the CGU including allocated goodwill exceeds its
recoverable amount, the allocated goodwill must be reduced
accordingly. The recoverable amount of a CGU is the higher of
its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. An
impairment loss recognized for goodwill is not reversed in a
subsequent period. The determination of fair value of the CGUs
requires considerable judgment by management.
The Company determines the recoverable amount of a CGU based on
discounted cash flow calculations. The Company believes that
this is the most meaningful method, in order to reflect the
cyclicality of the industry and to determine the recoverable
amount of the CGUs. The material assumptions underlying the
Companys discounted cash flow model for all of
Infineons CGUs include the weighted average cost of
capital (WACC) as well as the terminal growth rate
of the CGUs. The calculation of the discount rate is based on a
market participants view of the asset or CGU. In
accordance with IAS 36, the Company determines the appropriate
WACC for the CGUs based on market information, including
Infineons peer groups beta factors and leverage, and
other market borrowing rates. The terminal value growth rate is
based on available market studies from market research
institutes.
The assumptions used in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 reflected
market-driven changes but did not differ significantly.
Cash flows for the determination of the recoverable amount of
the CGUs were projected based on past experience, actual
operating results, and the 3 to
5-year
business plan in both 2008 and 2009. The business plan is
calculated bottom up by using certain central assumptions.
Certain cash flow parameters (depreciation/amortization, tax,
capital expenditures, change in working capital) are calculated
based on defined parameters. Cash flows for periods beyond the
planning periods are calculated using a terminal value. The
terminal growth rate does not exceed the long-term average
growth rate for the industry.
The Company used different discount rates for different CGUs due
to different risk profiles of its CGUs. In the 2009 fiscal year,
discount rates of 8.6 percent and 9.6 percent were
applied in determining the recoverable amount of the cash
generating units. The discount rate was calculated based on the
Companys weighted average cost of capital.
In addition, the individual impairment tests include sensitivity
analyses taking into account the WACC, the terminal value growth
rate as well as changes in the expected cash flows. As part of
the sensitivity analysis for each impairment test for a CGU,
these parameters were also subsequently reviewed until the
approval of the consolidated financial statements by the
Management Board.
Other intangible assets consist primarily of purchased
intangible assets, such as licenses and purchased technology,
which are recorded initially at acquisition cost, as well as
capitalized development costs. These intangible assets have
finite useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years and are
carried at cost less accumulated amortization using the
straight-line method.
Other long-lived
assets
The Company reviews all other long-lived assets, including
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to
amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances
F-17
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to
the recoverable amount, which is the higher of the assets
value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. Estimated
value in use is generally based on discounted estimated future
cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to
estimate discounted future cash flows.
If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value
of the assets exceeds their recoverable amount.
Pension Plans
and Similar Commitments
The Company operates various pension plans. The plans are
generally funded through payments to trustee-administered funds,
determined by periodic actuarial calculations. The Company has
both defined benefit and defined contribution plans.
A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the
Company pays fixed contributions into a separate entity (a
fund). The Company therefore has no legal or constructive
obligations to pay further contributions if one of its defined
contribution plans does not hold sufficient assets to pay all
employees the benefits relating to employee service in the
current and prior periods.
The Company pays contributions to publicly and privately
administered pension insurance plans. The Company has no further
payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. The
contributions are recognized as employee benefit expense when
they are due. The Company records a liability for amounts
payable under the provisions of its various defined contribution
plans. Prepaid contributions are recognized as an asset to the
extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments
is available.
A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that is not a defined
contribution plan. The liability recognized in the balance sheet
in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value
of the defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date less
the fair value of the plan assets, together with adjustments for
past service costs. The defined benefit obligation is calculated
annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit
credit method. The present value of the defined benefit
obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future
cash outflows using interest rates of high-quality corporate
bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits
will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating the
terms of the related pension liability.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions are recognized outside
profit or loss in the Consolidated Statement of Income and
Expense Recognized in Equity (SoRIE) in the period in
which they occur.
Past-service costs are recognized immediately in profit or loss,
unless the changes to the pension plan are conditional on the
employees remaining in service for a specified period of time
(the vesting period). In this case, the past-service costs are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Provisions
A provision is recognized in the balance sheet when the Company
has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a
past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits
will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable
estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If the
effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are
recognized at present value by discounting the expected future
cash outflows at a pretax rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to
the liability. Provisions for onerous contracts are measured at
the lower of the expected cost of fulfilling the contract and
the expected cost of terminating the contract. Additions to
provisions are generally recognized in profit or loss.
F-18
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Standards and
Interpretations Issued but Not Yet Adopted
In June 2007, the IASB issued IFRIC 13,Customer Loyalty
Programmes. The interpretation discusses the
accounting of loyalty programmes, whereby the entity provides
customers with incentives to buy their goods or services. The
interpretation is to be applied for fiscal years on or after
July 1, 2008. Earlier application is permitted. The EU
endorsed the interpretation for fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2009. Although the Company uses volume or
settlement discounting for its customers, it has no programs
within the scope of IFRIC 13.
In September 2007, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS
1,Presentation of Financial Statements. The
revision is aimed at improving users ability to analyze
and compare the information given in financial statements. IAS 1
sets overall requirements for the presentation of financial
statements, guidelines for their structure and minimum
requirements for their content. The revised IAS 1 resulted in
consequential amendments to other statements and
interpretations. The EU has endorsed the amendment to IAS 1. The
revision of IAS 1 will be effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after January 1, 2009. Therefore, for the Company,
the amendment will be effective for the fiscal year beginning on
October 1, 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact of
the amended IAS 1 on its financial statements.
In January 2008, the IASB published the amended standards IFRS
3,Business Combinations, (IFRS 3
(2008)), and IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements (IAS 27 (2008)). The
standards have been endorsed by the EU.
IFRS 3 (2008) reconsiders the application of acquisition
accounting for business combinations. Major changes relate to
the measurement of non-controlling interests, the accounting for
business combinations achieved in stages as well as the
treatment of contingent consideration and acquisition-related
costs. Based on the new standard, non-controlling interests may
be measured at their fair value (full-goodwill methodology) or
at the proportional fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. In business combinations achieved in
stages, any previously held equity interest in the acquiree is
remeasured to its acquisition date fair value. Any changes to
contingent consideration classified as a liability at the
acquisition date are recognized in profit and loss.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed in the period incurred.
Major changes in relation to IAS 27 (2008) relate to the
accounting for transactions which do not result in a change of
control as well as for those leading to a loss of control. If
there is no loss of control, transactions with non-controlling
interests are accounted for as equity transactions not affecting
profit and loss. At the date control is lost, any retained
equity interests are remeasured to fair value. Based on the
amended standard, non-controlling interests may show a deficit
balance since both profits and losses are allocated to the
shareholders based on their equity interests.
Both amended standards are effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after July 1, 2009. Therefore, for the Company the
amended standards are effective beginning October 1, 2009.
In January 2008, the IASB amended IFRS 2,Share-based
Payment, which deals with vesting conditions and
cancellations. It clarifies that vesting conditions are service
conditions and performance conditions only. Other features of a
share-based payment are not vesting conditions. These features
would need to be included in the grant date fair value for
transactions with employees and others providing similar
services; they would not impact the number of awards expected to
vest. All cancellations by the entity or by other parties should
receive the same accounting treatment. The amended standard is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1,
2009. Therefore, for the Company, the amendment will be
effective in its fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2009.
The Company is evaluating the impact of the amended IFRS 2 on it
financial statements.
In March 2009, the IASB issued Improving Disclosures about
Financial Instruments (Amendments to IFRS 7 Financial
Instruments: Disclosures) which enhances disclosures about
fair value measurements of
F-19
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
financial instruments and liquidity risk. The amendments will be
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1,
2009. Therefore, for the Company, the amendment will be
effective for the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2009.
The Company is evaluating the impact of the amended IFRS 7 on
its financial statements. The EU has not yet endorsed the
amendment to IFRS 7.
In June 2009, the IASB amended IFRS 2, Share-based
Payment, to clarify its scope and the accounting for
group cash-settled share-based payment transactions in the
separate or individual financial statements of the entity
receiving the goods or services when that entity has no
obligation to settle the share-based payment transaction. The
amendment will be effective for fiscal years on or after January
2010. Therefore, for the Company, the amendment will be
effective for its fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2010.
The EU has not yet endorsed the amendment. The new guidance is
not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Management
Estimates and Judgments
|
Certain accounting policies require critical accounting
estimates that involve complex and subjective judgments and the
use of assumptions, some of which may be for matters that are
inherently uncertain and susceptible to change. Such critical
accounting estimates could change from period to period and have
a material impact on financial condition or results of
operations. Critical accounting estimates could also involve
estimates where management reasonably could have used a
different estimate in the current accounting period. Management
cautions that future events often vary from forecasts and that
estimates routinely require adjustment.
Revenue
Recognition
Infineon generally markets its products to a wide variety of
customers and distributors. Revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred or services have been rendered, the risks and rewards
of ownership have been transferred to the customer, the amount
of revenue can be measured reliably, and collection of the
related receivable is reasonably assured. Reductions to revenue
for estimated product returns and allowances for discounts,
volume rebates and price protection are recorded, based on
historical experience, at the time the related revenue is
recognized. This process requires the exercise of substantial
judgment in evaluating the above-mentioned factors and requires
material estimates, including forecasted demand, returns and
industry pricing assumptions.
In future periods, the Company may be required to accrue
additional provisions due to (1) deterioration in the
semiconductor pricing environment, (2) reductions in
anticipated demand for semiconductor products or (3) lack
of market acceptance for new products. If these or other factors
result in a significant adjustment to sales discount and price
protection allowances, they could significantly impact the
Companys future operating results.
The Company has entered into licensing agreements for its
technology in the past, and anticipates that it will increase
its efforts to monetize the value of its technology in the
future. As with certain of the Companys existing licensing
agreements, any new licensing arrangements may include capacity
reservation agreements with the licensee. Such transactions
could represent multiple element arrangements. The process of
determining the appropriate revenue recognition in such
transactions is highly complex and requires significant
judgment, which includes evaluating material estimates in the
determination of fair value and the level of the Companys
continuing involvement.
Recoverability
of Non-Financial Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, including intangible
assets, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable.
F-20
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying value of the asset to the recoverable
amount, which is the higher of the assets value in use and
its fair value less costs to sell. If such assets are considered
to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the
amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their
recoverable amount.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least once a year. For the
purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to the
respective CGU that is expected to benefit from the goodwill.
The recoverable amounts of CGUs are determined based on value in
use calculations. Considerable management judgment is necessary
to estimate value in use and discounted future cash flows.
Valuation of
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable
value. The Company reviews the recoverability of inventory based
on regular monitoring of the size and composition of inventory
positions, current economic events and market conditions,
projected future product demand, and the pricing environment.
This evaluation is inherently judgmental and requires material
estimates, including both forecasted product demand and pricing
environment, both of which may be susceptible to significant
change.
Adjustments to the valuation and write-downs of inventory could
be necessary in future periods due to reduced semiconductor
demand in the industries that the Company serves, technological
obsolescence due to rapid developments of new products and
technological improvements, or changes in economic or other
events and conditions that impact the market price for the
Companys products which may have a significant impact on
the results of operations.
Realization of
Deferred Tax Assets
The Company evaluates the deferred tax asset position and the
need for a valuation allowance on a regular basis. The
assessment requires the exercise of judgment on the part of the
Companys management with respect to benefits that could be
realized from available tax strategies and future taxable
income, as well as other positive and negative factors. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the ability to generate the appropriate character of future
taxable income sufficient to utilize loss carry-forwards or tax
credits before their expiration. Since Infineon has incurred a
cumulative loss in certain tax jurisdictions over the three-year
period ended September 30, 2009, the impact of forecasted
future taxable income is excluded from such an assessment. For
these tax jurisdictions, the assessment was therefore based only
on the benefits that could be realized from available tax
strategies and the reversal of temporary differences in future
periods.
The recorded amount of total deferred tax assets could be
reduced if the estimates of projected future taxable income and
benefits from available tax strategies are lowered, or if
changes in current tax regulations are enacted that impose
restrictions on the timing or extent of the ability to utilize
tax loss and credit carry-forwards in the future.
Purchase
Accounting
Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of
the purchase price to identifiable tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities based upon their fair value. The
allocation of purchase price is highly judgmental, and requires
the extensive use of estimates and fair value assumptions, which
can have a significant impact on operating results.
F-21
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Pension Plan
Accounting
The Companys pension benefit costs are determined in
accordance with actuarial computations using the
projected-unit-credit
method, which relies on assumptions including discount rates and
expected return on plan assets. Discount rates are established
based on prevailing market rates for high-quality fixed-income
instruments that, if the pension benefit obligation were settled
at the measurement date, would provide the necessary future cash
flows to pay the benefit obligation when due. The expected
return on plan assets assumption is determined on a uniform
basis, considering long-term historical returns, asset
allocation, and future estimates of long-term investment
returns. Other key assumptions for the pension costs are based
on current market conditions. A significant variation in one or
more of these underlying assumptions could have a material
effect on the measurement of the long-term obligation.
Provisions
The Company is subject to various legal actions and claims,
including intellectual property matters that arise in and
outside the normal course of business.
The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of any adverse
outcome or judgments related to these matters, as well as
estimating the range of possible losses and recoveries.
Liabilities, including accruals for significant litigation
costs, related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, the
Company has recorded a provision and charged operating income in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to
certain asserted and unasserted claims existing as of each
balance sheet date. As additional information becomes available,
any potential liability related to these actions is assessed and
the estimates are revised, if necessary. These provisions would
be subject to change in the future based on new developments in
each matter, or changes in circumstances, which could have a
material impact on Infineons results of operations,
financial position and cash flows.
Trade and
Other Receivables
The allowance for doubtful accounts involves significant
management judgment and review of individual receivables based
on individual customer creditworthiness, current economic trends
and analysis of historical bad debts on a portfolio basis.
Regarding the determination of the valuation allowance derived
from a portfolio-based analysis of historical bad debts, a
decline of receivables results in a corresponding reduction of
such provisions and vice versa.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company
entered into agreements with Molstanda Vermietungsgesellschaft
mbH (Molstanda) and a financial institution.
Molstanda is the owner of a parcel of land located in the
vicinity of the Companys headquarters south of Munich.
Pursuant to SIC 12, Consolidation Special
Purpose Entities, the Company determined that
Molstanda meets the criteria of a Special Purpose Entity
(SPE) and, as a result of the agreements that the
Company controls it. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the
assets and liabilities of Molstanda beginning in the 2007 fiscal
year. The 35 million excess in fair value of
liabilities assumed and consolidated of 76 million,
over the fair value of the newly consolidated identifiable
assets of 41 million, was recorded as a financial
expense during the second quarter of the 2007 fiscal year. Due
to the Companys cumulative loss position, no tax benefit
was provided on this loss. The Company subsequently acquired the
majority of the outstanding capital of Molstanda during the
fourth quarter of the 2007 fiscal year.
On July 31, 2007, the Company acquired Texas Instruments
Inc.s (TI) DSL Customer Premises Equipment
(CPE) business for cash consideration of
45 million. The purchase price was subject to an
upward or downward contingent consideration adjustment of up to
$16 million, based on negotiated
F-22
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
revenue targets of the CPE business. Due to the failure to
achieve the negotiated revenue targets of the CPE business
during the nine months following the acquisition date, the cash
consideration has been adjusted downward by an amount of
$16 million, and this amount was reimbursed by TI.
Accordingly, the Company allocated an adjustment of
13 million of the purchase price to goodwill. As of
September 30, 2009 assets (including goodwill) acquired
from TI are classified as held for disposal as part
of the sale of the Wireline Communications business (see
note 5).
On October 24, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition
of the mobility products business of LSI Corporation
(LSI) for cash consideration of
316 million ($450 million) plus transaction
costs. As part of the acquisition, an amount of
14 million was allocated to purchased in-process
research and development based on discounted estimated future
cash flows over the estimated useful life. During the three
months ended December 31, 2007, this amount was expensed as
other operating expense because there was no future economic
benefit from its use or disposal. The purchase price was subject
to an additional contingent performance-based payment of up to
$50 million based on the relevant revenues in the
measurement period following the completion of the transaction
and ending December 31, 2008. Due to the lower revenues
during the measurement period, no performance-based payment was
paid.
On April 28, 2008, the Company acquired Primarion Inc.,
Torrance, California (Primarion) for cash
consideration of 32 million ($50 million) plus a
contingent performance-based payment of up to $30 million.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at
their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition. In
the 2009 fiscal year, as a result of a lawsuit filed against
Primarion subsequent to the acquisition, the net assets acquired
decreased by 4 million with a corresponding increase
in goodwill. Due to a reduction of the deferred tax asset at
Primarion, goodwill increased by another 3 million.
Due to the lower revenues during the measurement period, no
performance-based payment has been paid. In the acquisition of
Primarion, the Company did not obtain control over cash and cash
equivalents.
F-23
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company did not acquire any businesses in the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009. The following table summarizes
the Companys business acquisitions during the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008, including subsequent adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
LSI
|
|
|
Primarion
|
|
|
|
October 2007
|
|
|
April 2008
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Wireless
|
|
|
Industrial &
|
|
Segment
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
Multimarket
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-process research & development
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (purchase consideration)
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated statements of operations include the results of
the acquired businesses from the acquisition date. The Company
engaged an independent third party to assist in the valuation of
net assets acquired. Based on discounted estimated future cash
flows over the respective estimated useful life, an amount of
14 million was allocated to purchased in-process
research and development as part of the purchase of the mobility
products business from LSI and expensed as other operating
expense during the 2008 fiscal year because no future economic
benefit from its use or disposal was expected. The acquired
intangible assets consist of technology assets of
55 million and customer relationship assets of
73 million, each with a weighted average estimated
useful life of six years, and other intangible assets of
6 million with a weighted average estimated useful
life of less than one year. The goodwill amounts are expected to
be deductible for tax purposes.
Pro forma financial information relating to these acquisitions
is not material either individually or in the aggregate to the
results of operations and financial position of the Company and
has been omitted.
|
|
5.
|
Disposals and
Discontinued Operations
|
Polymer
Optical Fiber
On June 29, 2007, the Company sold its Polymer Optical
Fiber (POF) business, based in Regensburg, Germany,
to Avago Technologies Ltd. (Avago). The POF business
operates in the market for automotive multimedia infotainment
networks and transceivers for safety systems. As a result of the
sale, the Company realized a gain before tax of
17 million which was recorded in other operating
income during the 2007 fiscal year.
F-24
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
High Power
Bipolar Business
On September 28, 2007, the Company entered into a joint
venture agreement with Siemens AG (Siemens).
Effective September 30, 2007, the Company contributed all
assets and liabilities of its high power bipolar business
(including licenses, patents, and front-end and back-end
production assets) to a newly formed legal entity called
Infineon Technologies Bipolar GmbH & Co. KG
(Bipolar) and Siemens subsequently acquired a
40 percent interest in Bipolar for 37 million.
The transaction received regulatory approval and subsequently
closed on November 30, 2007. As a result of the sale, the
Company realized a gain before tax of 32 million
which was recorded in other operating income during the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2008. The joint venture agreement
grants Siemens certain contractual participating rights which
inhibit the Company from exercising control over Bipolar.
Accordingly, the Company accounts for the retained interest in
Bipolar under the equity method of accounting.
Hard Disk
Drive Business
On April 25, 2008, the Company sold its hard disk drive
(HDD) business to LSI for cash consideration of
60 million ($95 million). The HDD business
designs, manufactures and markets semiconductors for HDD
devices. The Company transferred its entire HDD activities,
including customer relationships, as well as know-how to LSI,
and granted LSI a license for intellectual property. The
transaction did not encompass the sale of significant assets or
transfer of employees. As a result of this transaction, the
Company realized a gain before tax of 39 million
which was recorded in other operating income during the 2008
fiscal year.
BAW
Business
On August 11, 2008, the Company sold its bulk acoustic wave
filter business (BAW) to Avago for cash
consideration of 21 million and entered into a supply
agreement through December 2009. The BAW business designs,
manufactures and markets cellular duplexers for N-CDMA and
W-CDMA applications and filters for GPS. The total consideration
received was allocated to the elements of the transaction on a
relative fair value basis. As a result, the Company realized a
gain before tax of 9 million which was recorded in
other operating income, and deferred 6 million which
will be realized over the term of the supply agreement.
SensoNor
Business
During the 2003 fiscal year the Company acquired SensoNor AS
(SensoNor) for total cash consideration of
34 million. SensoNor develops, produces and markets
tire pressure and acceleration sensors. On March 4, 2009,
the Company sold parts of the business, including property,
plant and equipment, inventories, and pension liabilities, and
transferred employees to a newly formed company called SensoNor
Technologies AS for cash consideration of 4 million
and one share in the capital of the new company. In addition,
the Company granted a license for intellectual property and
entered into a supply agreement through December 2011. The total
consideration received was allocated to the elements of the
transaction on a relative fair value basis. As a result, the
Company realized losses before tax of 17 million,
which were recorded in other operating expense, including a
provision of 8 million which will be recognized over
the term of the supply agreement. The Company has business
agreements with the new company to ensure a continued supply of
the components to the Companys tire pressure monitoring
systems until the Company ramps up production at its Villach
site.
Sale of Molded
Module Assets
During the quarter ending June 30, 2009, the Company
entered into a joint venture agreement with LS Industrial
Systems to establish LS Power Semitech Co., Ltd.
(LSIS). The joint venture is expected to operate in
Korea and elsewhere in Asia, and will focus on the development,
production and marketing of
F-25
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
molded power modules for white good applications. LSIS will hold
54 percent and the Company 46 percent of the joint
venture. The agreement is subject to regulatory approvals and
the transaction is expected to close in the 2009 calendar year.
Concurrent with the announcement of the joint venture agreement,
the Company reclassified the molded module assets as assets held
for sale and ceased the recognition of depreciation and
amortization expense pursuant to IFRS 5.
ALTIS
ALTIS Semiconductor S.N.C., Essonnes, France (ALTIS)
is a joint venture between the Company and International
Business Machines Corporation, New York, USA (IBM),
with each having equal voting representation. The Company fully
consolidates ALTIS in accordance with IAS 27,
Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements. In August 2007, the Company and IBM signed
an agreement in principle to divest their respective shares in
ALTIS. Pursuant to IFRS 5, the assets and liabilities of ALTIS
were classified as held for disposal in the consolidated balance
sheet as of September 30, 2007, and the recognition of
depreciation expense ceased as of August 1, 2007. As of
September 30, 2008, negotiations with the prospective
purchaser had terminated. Although negotiations are ongoing with
additional parties, the outcome of these negotiations is
uncertain. As a result, the Company reclassified the disposal
groups assets and liabilities previously classified as
held for sale into held and used in the consolidated balance
sheet as of September 30, 2008. Upon reclassification, an
adjustment of 104 million was recorded in income from
continuing operations, resulting from the measurement of the
disposal group at the lower of its carrying amount before being
classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation and
amortization expense that would have been recognized had the
disposal group been continuously classified as held and used,
and its recoverable amount at the date of the reclassification.
Qimonda
discontinued operations
During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company committed to a plan to
dispose of Qimonda AG, a majority owned company engaged in the
manufacturing and sale of semiconductor memory products
(Qimonda). Consequently, the results of Qimonda are
reported as discontinued operations in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented,
and the assets and liabilities of Qimonda have been reclassified
as held for disposal in the consolidated balance sheets.
Market prices for Qimondas principal memory products, DRAM
chips and modules, experienced extremely significant declines
from the beginning of the 2007 calendar year. As a result of
this intense pricing pressure, Qimonda continued to incur
significant losses during the 2008 fiscal year, which are
reflected in loss from discontinued operations, net of
income tax in the Companys consolidated statements
of operations. In addition, the Company recorded after-tax
write-downs totaling 1,475 million in the 2008 fiscal
year, in order to remeasure Qimonda to its estimated current
fair value less costs to sell. These write-downs were also
reflected in loss from discontinued operations, net of
income tax in the Companys consolidated statements
of operations. Pursuant to IFRS 5, Non-current Assets
Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, the
recognition of depreciation and amortization expense ceased as
of March 31, 2008.
On January 23, 2009, Qimonda and its wholly owned
subsidiary Qimonda Dresden GmbH & Co. oHG
(Qimonda Dresden) filed an application at the Munich
Local Court to commence insolvency proceedings. As a result of
this application, the Company deconsolidated Qimonda in
accordance with IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements, during the second quarter of the
2009 fiscal year. On April 1, 2009, the insolvency
proceedings formally opened. Formal insolvency proceedings have
also been commenced by several additional subsidiaries of
Qimonda in various jurisdictions. The final resolution of the
insolvency proceedings, including the final disposition of the
remaining assets and liabilities of Qimonda, cannot be predicted
at this time.
F-26
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The results presented for Qimonda from October 1, 2008,
through January 23, 2009 (the date of deconsolidation), are
based on preliminary results provided by Qimonda prior to its
insolvency filing, and were prepared on a going concern basis.
Financial statements on a liquidation basis, which would be
required when the going concern assumption is not assured, are
not available from Qimonda. There can be no assurance that
recorded book values of individual assets and liabilities held
for disposal by Infineon would not be materially different if
presented on a liquidation basis; however, as the net assets of
Qimonda held for disposal by Infineon through deconsolidation
are already valued at the fair value less costs to sell of zero
as of September 30, 2008, the net value presented in the
consolidated financial statements would not be impacted.
As a result of the deconsolidation of Qimonda, Qimondas
cash and cash equivalents of 286 million as of the
date of deconsolidation are presented as cash outflow within net
cash provided by investing activities from discontinuing
operations.
The operating losses of Qimonda from October 1, 2008,
through the date of deconsolidation, exclusive of depreciation,
amortization and impairment of long-lived assets, were offset by
a partial reversal of 460 million of the write-downs
recorded in the 2008 fiscal year to reduce the net assets of
Qimonda to fair value less costs to sell of zero.
During the 2009 fiscal year, Qimonda-related amounts included in
loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes consisted
principally of:
|
|
|
|
|
the realization of accumulated foreign currency translation
losses of 88 million which were directly recorded in
equity, and not included in assets and liabilities held for
disposal as of September 30, 2008, primarily from
Qimondas sale of its interest in Inotera Memories Inc.
(Inotera) to Micron Technology, Inc.
(Micron),
|
|
|
|
the realization of accumulated foreign currency translation
losses which were directly recorded in equity related to the
deconsolidation of Qimonda totaling
100 million, and
|
|
|
|
charges for valuation allowances of 227 in connection with
Qimondas insolvency (see below).
|
As a result of the commencement of insolvency proceedings by
Qimonda, Infineon is exposed to potential liabilities arising in
connection with the Qimonda business, which include, among
others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is a named defendant in certain pending antitrust
and securities law claims. Qimonda is required to indemnify
Infineon, in whole or in part, for such claims, including any
related expenses. As a result of Qimondas insolvency,
however, the Company expects that Qimonda will not be able to
indemnify it for these claims. For more information on these
pending antitrust and securities law claims and their potential
impact on the Company, see note 38 (Commitments
and Contingencies Litigation and Government
Inquiries Antitrust Litigation,
Other Government Litigation and,
Securities Litigation).
|
|
|
|
The Company is the named defendant in a lawsuit in Delaware in
which the plaintiffs are seeking to hold the Company liable for
the payment of severance and other benefits allegedly due by
Qimondas North American subsidiaries in connection with
the termination of employment related to Qimondas
insolvency. For more information on this suit, see note 38
(Commitments and Contingencies Litigation
and Government Inquiries Qimonda Employment
Litigation).
|
|
|
|
The Company faces potential liabilities arising from its former
participation in Qimonda Dresden. Before the carve-out of the
Qimonda business, the Company was a general partner of Qimonda
Dresden, and as such may in certain circumstances, as a matter
of law, be held liable for certain liabilities of Qimonda
Dresden that originated prior to the carve-out. These include,
among others, the potential repayment of governmental subsidies
as well as employee-related claims, including
|
F-27
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
salaries and social security contributions. The Company is in
negotiations with the Free State of Saxony and the Qimonda
insolvency administrator regarding these matters. The Company
has recorded a provision in connection with these matters, but
disclosure of the amount of the provision could seriously
prejudice the Companys negotiations regarding these
matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company and its subsidiary Infineon Technologies Dresden
GmbH (Infineon Dresden) are subject to lawsuits by
approximately 70 former Infineon employees who were transferred
to Qimonda or Qimonda Dresden as part of the carve-out and who
seek to be re-employed by the Company. No reasonable estimated
amount can be attributed at this time to the potential outcome
of any such claims.
|
In addition to the matters described above, the Company may be
subject to claims by the insolvency administrator under German
insolvency laws for repayment of certain amounts received by the
Company from Qimonda, such as payments for intra-group services
and supplies, during defined periods prior to the commencement
of insolvency proceedings. Depending on future developments in
Qimondas operations in Portugal, there is a risk that
claims could be made against the Company in connection with
governmental subsidies received by Qimonda Portugal S.A. prior
to the carve-out. No such claims have been made to date, and no
reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at this time to
the potential outcome of any such claims. The insolvency of
Qimonda may also subject the Company to other claims arising in
connection with the contracts, offers, uncompleted transactions,
continuing obligations, risks, encumbrances and other
liabilities contributed to Qimonda in connection with the
carve-out of the Qimonda business, as the Company expects that
Qimonda will not be able to fulfill its obligation to indemnify
Infineon against any such liabilities.
Moreover, the Company may lose rights and licenses to
Qimondas intellectual property to which it is entitled to
under the contribution agreement in connection with the
carve-out of the Qimonda business due to the fact that the
administrator has declared non-performance of this agreement.
The Company is evaluating the scope of any potentially affected
intellectual property, and is unable to provide any reasonable
estimate at this time of any potential costs in this regard.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company recorded aggregate
liabilities of 21 million and provisions of
163 million in connection with these matters. The
recorded provisions are primarily reflected within Current
provisions, and the remainder are recorded within
Long-term provisions. The recorded provisions
reflect the amount of those liabilities that management believes
are probable and can be estimated with reasonable accuracy at
that time. There can be no assurance that such provisions
recorded will be sufficient to cover all liabilities that may
ultimately be incurred in relation to these matters. Disclosure
of individual amounts with respect to these matters could
seriously prejudice the Companys legal or negotiating
position, and therefore have been omitted. No reasonable
estimate can be made at this time related to those potential
liabilities that may be incurred, but that are currently not
viewed to be probable.
Concurrently with the issuance of $248 million in
convertible notes due 2013 by Qimonda (as guarantor) through its
subsidiary Qimonda Finance LLC (as issuer) on February 12,
2008, Infineon had loaned Credit Suisse International
20.7 million Qimonda ADSs ancillary to the placement of the
convertible notes. As of September 30, 2009,
17.1 million of the ADSs lent had been returned to
Infineon. In October 2009 Credit Suisse International returned
the remaining 3.6 million Qimonda ADSs.
Sale of
Wireline Communications Business discontinued
operations
On July 7, 2009, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement with Lantiq, affiliates of Golden Gate Private Equity
Inc. (Lantiq), pursuant to which it agreed to sell
the Wireline Communications business, one of the Companys
segments. The majority of the purchase price was paid at closing
on November 6, 2009, in the amount of 223 million,
with up to an additional 20 million of the purchase
price being payable nine months after the closing date. See
note 40 for further information regarding the sale.
F-28
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As a result of the decision to dispose of the Wireline
Communications business, the Company reclassified those assets
and liabilities of its Wireline Communications business to be
transferred to Lantiq as assets held for disposal in the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009,
pursuant to IFRS 5, and the recognition of depreciation and
amortization expense ceased from July 2009. The results of the
Wireline Communications business are reported as discontinued
operations, net of income taxes in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Certain expenses in respect of overhead functions that were
allocated to the Wireline Communications business in the past,
but will not be transferred as part of the sale of the Wireline
Communications business to Lantiq, were allocated to continuing
operations, as required by IFRS 5. The Company intends to
eliminate those costs during the 2010 fiscal year.
Assets and
liabilities classified as held for disposal
Assets and liabilities held for disposal as of
September 30, 2008 are primarily composed of the book
values of Qimondas assets and liabilities.
At September 30, 2008, the carrying amounts of the major
classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for
disposal were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
421
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
255
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
289
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
376
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
76
|
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method
|
|
|
14
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
59
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down
|
|
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
346
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
592
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
220
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
300
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
427
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
22
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
16
|
|
Long-term provisions
|
|
|
25
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities associated with assets held for disposal
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized directly in equity relating to assets and
liabilities classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities held for disposal as of
September 30, 2009 are primarily composed of the book
values of assets and liabilities to be disposed of in connection
with the sale of the Wireline Communications business. At
September 30, 2009, the carrying amounts of the major
classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for
disposal were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
43
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
9
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets classified as held for disposal
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current provisions
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
2
|
|
Pension plans and similar commitments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities associated with assets held for disposal
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Loss from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes
The results of Qimonda and of the Wireline Communication
business presented in the consolidated statements of operations
as discontinued operations for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, consist of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Qimonda(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,608
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(3,956
|
)
|
|
|
(3,773
|
)
|
|
|
(779
|
)
|
Reversal (write-down) of measurement to fair value less costs to
sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
|
460
|
|
Expenses resulting from Qimondas application to open
insolvency proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
Losses resulting from the realization from accumulated losses
related to unrecognized currency translation effects primarily
upon deconsolidation and Qimondas sale of Inotera
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
(3,463
|
)
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimondas share of discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(327
|
)
|
|
|
(3,559
|
)
|
|
|
(420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before tax
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications share of discontinued operations,
net of income taxes
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No further information concerning
Qimondas condensed consolidated statements of operations
is available for the period from January 1, 2009 to
January 23, 2009, the date of the application by Qimonda to
commence insolvency proceedings. As disclosed above, due to the
write down of Qimondas net assets to zero as of
September 30, 2008, the operating losses of Qimonda for the
period from October 1, 2008 to January 23, 2009 did
not affect the consolidated net income of the Company, but
instead were eliminated via an offsetting partial reversal of
previously recorded impairments. Therefore, while the amount of
revenue and costs and expenses in the table above exclude
amounts for the period from January 1, 2009 to
January 23, 2009, Qimondas share of the loss from
discontinued operations, net of income taxes of
420 million is unaffected.
|
During the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
the Company recognized revenues related to license and
technology transfer fees of 19 million,
53 million and 18 million, respectively,
which are included in revenues in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Included in
F-31
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
these amounts are previously deferred license fees of
1 million, 1 million and
0 million, which were recognized as revenue pursuant
to IAS 18 in the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively, since the Company had fulfilled all of its
obligations and the amounts were realized.
The Company has received economic development funding from
various governmental entities, including grants for the
construction of manufacturing facilities, as well as grants to
subsidize research and development activities and employee
training. Grants and subsidies included in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Included in the consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred government grants amounted to 22 million and
21 million as of September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. The amounts of grants receivable as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009 were 28 million and
30 million, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Supplemental
Operating Cost Information
|
The costs of services and materials are as follows for the years
ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Raw materials, supplies and purchased goods
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Purchased services
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses are as follows for the years ended September
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Wages and salaries
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
Social levies
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Pension expense
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The average number of employees by geographic region was as
follows for the years ended September
30(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
10,553
|
|
|
|
10,085
|
|
|
|
9,379
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
North America
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
13,094
|
|
|
|
11,763
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infineon
|
|
|
29,774
|
|
|
|
29,465
|
|
|
|
26,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qimonda(2)
|
|
|
12,775
|
|
|
|
12,990
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,549
|
|
|
|
42,455
|
|
|
|
29,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately 860 employees are to
be transferred to Lantiq upon closing of the sale of the
Wireline Communications business.
|
|
(2) |
|
The average number of employees in
the 2009 fiscal year is derived from the number of employees in
the first quarter of 11,079, and zero in the second, third and
fourth quarter as a result of the deconsolidation of Qimonda in
the second quarter when Qimonda filed for insolvency.
|
Other operating income was as follows for the years ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Gains from sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Reversal of impairments and long lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expense was as follows for the years ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Losses from sales of businesses and interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Long-lived asset impairment charges
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2006 fiscal year, restructuring plans were announced
to downsize the workforce at ALTIS and the Companys chip
card back-end activities in order to maintain competitiveness
and reduce cost. As part of these restructuring measures, the
Company agreed upon plans to terminate approximately
390 employees and recorded restructuring charges in the
2007 fiscal year.
F-33
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
During the 2007 fiscal year, further restructuring measures were
taken by the Company, mainly as a result of the insolvency of
one of its largest mobile phone customers, BenQ Mobile
GmbH & Co. OHG, and in order to further streamline
certain research and development locations. Approximately 280
jobs were affected worldwide, of which approximately 120 were in
the German locations of Munich, Salzgitter and Nuremberg.
To address rising risks in the market environment, adverse
currency trends and below benchmark margins, the Company
implemented the IFX10+ cost-reduction program in the third
quarter of the 2008 fiscal year. The IFX10+ program targeted
certain areas to reduce costs, including product portfolio
management, manufacturing costs reduction, value chain
optimization, process efficiency, reorganization of the
Companys structure along its target markets, and
reductions in workforce. Approximately 10 percent of
Infineons worldwide workforce was terminated during the
2009 fiscal year as a result of IFX10+. The IFX10+ program
resulted in restructuring charges of 172 million in
the 2008 fiscal year, primarily for employee related termination
costs incurred or expected as of September 30, 2008. In the
2009 fiscal year, the Company recorded a partial reversal of
provisions in the amount of 25 million recorded as of
September 30, 2008 in connection with the IFX10+
cost-reduction program. The reversal was partially offset by
5 million of restructuring expenses in the 2009
fiscal year.
Total rental expenses under operating leases amounted to
114 million, 97 million and
95 million for the years ended September 30,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
The amount of financial income is as follows for the years ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Valuation changes and gains on sales
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income for the year ended September 30, 2009
includes a gain before tax of 61 million as a result
of the repurchase of subordinated exchangeable notes due 2010
and convertible subordinated notes due 2010 (see note 27).
No gain before tax was recorded for repurchases in the 2008
fiscal year. During the 2007 fiscal year, no repurchases took
place.
The amount of financial expense is as follows for the years
ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Losses on sales of
available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Other financial expense
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense for the years ended September 30, 2008 and
2009 includes a loss before tax of 8 million and
6 million, respectively, as a result of repurchases
and redemptions of convertible
F-34
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
subordinated notes due 2010 and exchangeable subordinated notes
due 2010 (see note 27). During the 2007 fiscal year no
repurchases took place.
|
|
11.
|
Income Tax
(Benefit) Expense
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is
attributable to the following geographic locations for the years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations for the
years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Current taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax expense attributable to prior years is
12 million, 10 million and
0 million for the years ended September 30,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
In 2007, the Companys corporate statutory tax rate in
Germany is 25 percent plus a solidarity surcharge of
5.5 percent. Additionally, a trade tax of 11 percent
is levied, which results in a combined statutory tax rate of
37 percent in 2007.
On August 17, 2007 the Business Tax Reform Act 2008 was
enacted in Germany including several changes to the taxation of
German business activities, including a reduction of the
Companys combined statutory corporate and trade tax rate
in Germany from 37 to 28 percent, which comprises corporate
tax of 15 percent plus a solidarity surcharge of
5.5 percent and trade tax of 12 percent. Most of the
changes came into effect for the Company in its 2008 fiscal
year. Pursuant to IAS 12, the Company recorded a deferred tax
charge of 25 million as of September 30, 2007,
reflecting the reduction in value of the Companys deferred
tax assets in Germany upon enactment.
F-35
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
A reconciliation of income taxes from continuing operations for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
determined using the German combined statutory tax rate of
37 percent for 2007 and 28 percent for 2008 and 2009
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Expected expense (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Increase in available tax credits
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Tax rate differential
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Permanent differences. net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Change in German tax rate
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities presented in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The movement in deferred tax assets, net is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
381
|
|
Reclassification to discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30,
2008 and 2009 relate to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and pensions
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
Other items
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Germany, at September 30, 2009, the Company had
corporate tax loss carry-forwards of 3.4 billion and
trade tax loss carry-forwards of 4.6 billion. In
other jurisdictions, the Company had tax loss carry-forwards of
79 million and tax credit carry-forwards of
168 million. Such tax loss carry-forwards and tax
credit carry-forwards are generally limited to use by the
particular entity that generated the loss or credit and do not
expire under current law. The benefit for tax credits is
accounted for on the flow-through method when the individual
legal entity is entitled to the claim.
The Company has assessed its deferred tax asset and the need for
a valuation allowance. Such an assessment considers whether it
is probable or not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets may not be realized. The assessment requires considerable
judgment on the part of management, with respect to, among other
factors, benefits that could be realized from available tax
strategies and future taxable income, as well as other positive
and negative factors. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the Companys ability to generate
the appropriate character of future taxable income sufficient to
utilize loss carry-forwards or tax credits before their
expiration. Since the Company had incurred a cumulative loss in
certain tax jurisdictions over a three-year period as of
September 30, 2009, which is significant evidence that the
probability criterion is not met, the impact of forecasted
future taxable income is excluded from such an assessment. For
these tax jurisdictions, the assessment was therefore only based
on the benefits that could be realized from available tax
strategies and the reversal of temporary differences in future
periods. As a result of this assessment, the Company increased
the deferred tax asset valuation allowance as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009 by 183 million and
88 million, respectively, to reduce the deferred tax
asset to an amount that is more likely than not expected to be
realized in future.
F-37
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company did not provide for income taxes or foreign
withholding taxes on cumulative earnings of foreign subsidiaries
as of September 30, 2008 and 2009, as these earnings are
intended to be indefinitely reinvested in those operations. It
is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized
deferred tax liabilities for these undistributed foreign
earnings.
|
|
12.
|
Earnings (Loss)
Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) is calculated
by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding plus all
additional ordinary shares that would have been outstanding if
potentially dilutive instruments or ordinary share equivalents
had been issued.
The computation of basic and diluted EPS for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Numerator ( in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
Less: Portion attributable to minority interests
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to shareholders of
Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(3,543
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
Less: Portion attributable to minority interests
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
(2,746
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(2,935
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (shares in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
|
812.2
|
|
|
|
813.3
|
|
|
|
854.5
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share (in ):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to shareholders of
Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
|
(3.38
|
)
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to shareholders of Infineon Technologies AG
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
(3.61
|
)
|
|
|
(0.73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted-average shares
outstanding basic and diluted for all
periods have been adjusted in accordance with IAS 33.27 as
a result of the capital increase in August 2009.
|
The weighted average of potentially dilutive instruments that
were excluded from the diluted loss per share computations,
because the exercise price was greater than the average market
price of the ordinary
F-38
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
shares during the period or were otherwise not dilutive,
includes 41.2 million, 34.3 million and
25.2 million shares underlying employee stock options for
the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. Additionally, 74.7 million, 65.0 million
and 82.5 million ordinary shares issuable upon the
conversion of the convertible subordinated notes for the years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per
share as their impact would have been antidilutive.
|
|
13.
|
Available-for-sale
Financial Assets
|
Marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale
financial instruments and therefore recorded at fair value at
each balance sheet date with unrealized gains and losses that
are not considered
other-than-temporary
impairments recognized in equity until realized. The non-current
position of marketable securities is reflected in other
financial assets (see note 20).
Marketable securities at September 30, 2008 and 2009
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Foreign government securities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed term securities
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets (note 20)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses relating to securities held for more than
12 months as of September 30, 2008 and 2009 were
5 million and 0 million, respectively.
Realized gains and losses are reflected as financial income
(expense) and were as follows for the fiscal years ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses), net
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, fixed term deposits of
25 million had contractual maturities between three
and 12 months.
F-39
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Debt securities as of September 30, 2009 had the following
remaining contractual maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Between 1 and 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
|
|
14.
|
Trade and Other
Receivables
|
Trade accounts and other receivables at September 30, 2008
and 2009 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
Related parties trade
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, gross
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants receivable (note 7)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
License fees receivable
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Third party financial and other receivables
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Receivables from German banks deposit protection fund
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Related parties financial and other receivables
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee receivables
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and
available-for-sale
financial assets in the amount of 121 million were
reclassified to amounts receivable from the German banks
deposit protection fund as of September 30, 2008. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company received
120 million from the German banks deposit
protection fund. 1 million outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 was received on October 30, 2009.
F-40
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts at beginning of year
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Usage of allowance, net
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Current years allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Reclassification in held for disposal
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts at end of year
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides separate disclosure on the age of
trade accounts receivables that are past due at the reporting
date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereof
|
|
Of which not impaired
|
|
|
|
|
neither
|
|
but past due as of reporting date
|
|
|
|
|
impaired
|
|
Past due
|
|
Past due
|
|
Past due
|
|
Past due
|
|
Past due
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
nor past
|
|
0-30
|
|
31-60
|
|
61-180
|
|
181-360
|
|
> 360
|
|
|
amount
|
|
due
|
|
days
|
|
days
|
|
days
|
|
days
|
|
days
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Third party trade, net of allowances as of
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third party trade, net of allowances as of
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on historic default rates, the Company believes that no
allowance is necessary in respect of trade receivables that are
not past due or past due by up to 60 days.
Inventories at September 30, 2008 and 2009 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Inventories
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Other Current
Financial Assets
|
Other current financial assets at September 30, 2008 and
2009 consisted of financial instruments in an amount of
19 million and 26 million, respectively.
F-41
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Other current assets at September 30, 2008 and 2009 consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
VAT and other tax receivables
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
|
A summary of activity for property, plant and equipment for the
years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
office
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buildings
|
|
|
and machinery
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
in progress
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
8,854
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
12,871
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Acquisitions through business combinations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(4,202
|
)
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(5,899
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
4,766
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
6,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical
|
|
|
plant and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
office
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buildings
|
|
|
and machinery
|
|
|
equipment
|
|
|
in progress
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and impairment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
(6,478
|
)
|
|
|
(1,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,226
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,963
|
)
|
|
|
(1,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Reversal of impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
(4,167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the year ended
September 30, 2008, transfers relate primarily to assets of
the Qimonda disposal group that were classified as held for
disposal, and assets of the ALTIS disposal group that were
reclassified into held and used. In the year ended
September 30, 2009, transfers relate primarily to assets of
the Wireline Communications business that were classified as
held for disposal.
|
F-43
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
19.
|
Investments
Accounted for Using the Equity Method
|
Investments accounted for using the equity method principally
relate to investment activities aimed at strengthening the
Companys future intellectual property potential.
A summary of activity for investments accounted for using the
equity method for the years ended September 30, 2008 and
2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
to held for
disposal(1)
|
|
|
(627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reclassification relates to the
investment in Inotera Memories Inc., which was reclassified in
held for disposal.
|
The aggregate summarized financial information for the
Companys most significant investments accounted for using
the equity method (which consists primarily of Bipolar) for the
years ended September 30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
20.
|
Other Financial
Assets
|
Other non-current financial assets at September 30, 2008
and 2009 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets (note 13)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Investments in other equity investments
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Related parties financial and other receivables
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets designated at fair value
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets at September 30, 2008 and 2009
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
22.
|
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
|
A summary of activity for intangible assets for the years ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
developed
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intangible
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
Additions internally developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Additions from business combinations
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Additions other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
In-process R&D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions internally developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Additions from business combinations
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Additions other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Transfers(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the year ended
September 30, 2008, transfers relate primarily to assets of
the Qimonda disposal group that were classified as held for
disposal, and assets of the ALTIS disposal group that were
reclassified into held and used. In the year ended
September 30, 2009, transfers relate primarily to assets of
the Wireline Communications business that were classified as
held for disposal.
|
F-46
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The estimated aggregate amortization expense relating to
internally developed and other intangible assets for each of the
five succeeding fiscal years is as follows: 2010:
60 million; 2011: 56 million; 2012:
43 million; 2013: 26 million and 2014:
3 million.
|
|
23.
|
Trade and Other
Payables
|
Trade and other payables at September 30, 2008 and 2009
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Third party trade
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Related parties trade
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties financial and other payables
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions at September 30, 2008 and 2009 consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Personnel costs
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Warranties and licenses
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for personnel costs relate to employee-related
obligations and include, among others, costs of incentive and
bonus payments, holiday and vacation payments, termination
benefits, early retirement, service anniversary awards, other
personnel costs and related social security payments.
Provisions for warranties and licenses mainly represent the
estimated future cost of fulfilling contractual requirements
associated with products sold.
Provisions for asset retirement obligations relate to certain
items of property, plant and equipment. Such asset retirement
obligations may arise due to attributable environmental
clean-up
costs and to costs primarily associated with the removal of
leasehold improvements at the end of the lease term.
Other provisions comprise provisions for outstanding expenses,
penalties for default or delay on contracts, conservation, and
waste management, and for miscellaneous other liabilities. The
increase in other provisions for the year ended
September 30, 2009 is primarily the result of the
insolvency of Qimonda (see note 5). As of
September 30, 2009, 163 million of
253 million relates to the insolvency of Qimonda.
Of the total amounts of 451 million and
525 million of provisions as of September 30,
2008 and 2009, respectively, the outflow of economic benefit is
expected to occur within one year in respect of
424 million and 436 million, respectively.
F-47
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
A summary of activity for provisions for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Post-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Antitrust
|
|
|
retirement
|
|
|
retirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
costs
|
|
|
licenses
|
|
|
settlement
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
Reclassification to held for disposal
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Usage
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
Reversals
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amounts of provisions are reflected in the
consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2008 and
2009, respectively, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.
|
Other Current
Financial Liabilities
|
Other current financial liabilities at September 30, 2008
and 2009 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Financial instruments (note 36)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Settlement for anti-trust related matters (note 38)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
26.
|
Other Current
Liabilities
|
Other current liabilities at September 30, 2008 and 2009
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
VAT and other taxes payable
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Payroll obligations to employees
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Deferred government grants (note 7)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Current portion of pension obligations (note 35)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other deferred income includes amounts relating primarily to
deferred license income (see note 6). The non-current
portion is included in other liabilities (see note 29).
Debt at September 30, 2008 and 2009 consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable to banks, weighted average rate 1.85%
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, 5.0%, due 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt and current maturities
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, 7.5%, due 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Exchangeable subordinated notes, 1,375%, due 2010
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, 5.0%, due 2010
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable to banks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured term loans, weighted average rate 2.59%, due
2009-2013
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Secured term loans, weighted average rate 2.45%, due 2013
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to governmental entity, due 2010
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term loans payable to banks consist primarily of
borrowings under the terms of short-term borrowing arrangements.
On June 5, 2003, the Company (as guarantor), through its
subsidiary Infineon Technologies Holding B.V. (as issuer),
issued 700 million in convertible subordinated notes
due 2010 at par in an underwritten offering to institutional
investors in Europe. The notes were originally convertible, at
the option of the holders of the notes, into a maximum of
68.4 million ordinary shares of the Company, at a
conversion price
F-49
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
of 10.23 per share through maturity. As a result of the
Companys share capital increase in August 2009 (see
note 30), the conversion price has been adjusted to
9.14 in accordance with an antidilution provision
contained in the notes. The notes accrue interest at
5.0 percent per year. The notes are unsecured and rank pari
passu with all present and future unsecured subordinated
obligations of the issuer. The noteholders have a negative
pledge relating to future capital market indebtedness, as
defined. The noteholders have an early redemption option in the
event of a change of control, as defined. A corporate
reorganization resulting in a substitution of the guarantor
shall not be regarded as a change of control, as defined. The
Company may redeem the convertible notes after three years at
their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon, if the
Companys share price exceeds 125 percent of the
conversion price on 15 trading days during a period of 30
consecutive trading days. The convertible notes are listed on
the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. On September 29, 2006 the
Company (through the issuer) irrevocably waived its option to
pay a cash amount in lieu of the delivery of shares upon
conversion. During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company repurchased
a notional amount of 100 million of its convertible
subordinated notes due 2010 and the repurchased notes were
subsequently cancelled. The transaction resulted in a loss of
8 million before tax, which was recognized in
interest expense. The repurchase was made out of available cash.
At September 30, 2008, the outstanding notional amount was
600 million. Throughout the 2009 fiscal year, the
Company repurchased additional notional amounts of
152 million of its convertible subordinated notes due
2010. This includes repurchases effected through a public tender
offer in May 2009. Repurchases of a notional amount of
74 million resulted in a loss of 4 million
before tax, which was recognized in interest expense.
Repurchases of a notional amount of 78 million
resulted in a gain of 15 million before tax, which
was recognized in interest income. The repurchases were made out
of available cash amounting to 131 million, and the
repurchased notes were subsequently cancelled. At
September 30, 2009, the outstanding notional amount was
448 million.
On September 26, 2007, the Company (as guarantor) through
its subsidiary Infineon Technologies Investment B.V. (as
issuer), issued 215 million in exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010 at par. The notes accrued interest
at 1.375 percent per year. The notes were exchangeable into
a maximum of 20.5 million Qimonda ADSs. Throughout the 2009
fiscal year, the Company repurchased and redeemed notional
amounts of 215 million of its exchangeable
subordinated notes due 2010. This includes repurchases effected
through a tender offer in May 2009. Repurchases and redemptions
of a notional amount of 48 million resulted in a loss
of 2 million before tax, which was recognized in
interest expense. Repurchases of a notional amount of
167 million resulted in a gain of
46 million before tax, which was recognized in
interest income. The repurchases and redemptions were made out
of available cash amounting to 154 million, and
repurchased notes were subsequently cancelled. After determining
that the outstanding amount of the notes had fallen below
20 percent of the original issue size, the Company
exercised its right to terminate the notes and fully redeemed
the remaining 19 million at par on September 29,
2009. Consequently, there is no outstanding amount at
September 30, 2009.
On May 26, 2009, the Company (as guarantor), through its
subsidiary Infineon Technologies Holding B.V., issued
196 million in new subordinated convertible notes at
a discount of 7.2 percent in an offering to institutional
investors. The notes were initially convertible, at the option
of the holders of the notes, into a maximum of 74.9 million
ordinary shares of the Company, at a conversion price of
2.61 per share through maturity. As a result of the
Companys share capital increase in August 2009 (see
note 30), the conversion price has been adjusted to
2.33 in accordance with an antidilution provision
contained in the notes. The notes accrue interest at
7.5 percent per year. The principal of the notes is
unsecured and ranks pari passu with all present and
future unsecured subordinated obligations of the issuer. The
coupons of the notes are secured and unsubordinated. The
noteholders have a negative pledge relating to future capital
market indebtedness and an early redemption option in the event
of a change of control. The Company may redeem the convertible
notes due 2014 after two and a half years at their nominal
amount plus interest accrued thereon plus the present value of
all remaining coupon payments through the maturity date, if the
Companys closing share price exceeds 150 percent of
the conversion price on 15 out of the previous 30
F-50
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
consecutive trading days. The notes are listed on the Open
Market (Freiverkehr) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
31 million attributable to the conversion right of
the noteholders were recognized in additional paid in capital at
the date of issuance for the subordinated convertible notes due
2014.
In September 2004, the Company executed a
$400/400 million syndicated credit facility with a
five-year term, which was subsequently reduced to
$345/300 million in August 2006. The facility
consisted of two tranches. Tranche A was a term loan
originally intended to finance the expansion of the Richmond,
Virginia manufacturing facility. The facility had customary
financial covenants, and drawings bore interest at
market-related rates that were linked to financial performance.
The lenders of this credit facility had been granted a negative
pledge relating to the future financial indebtedness of the
Company with certain permitted encumbrances. In January 2006,
the Company drew $345 million under Tranche A, on the
basis of a repayment schedule that consisted of equal
installments falling due in March and September each year. On
September 23, 2009, Tranche A was fully repaid at its
final maturity. Tranche B, which was a multicurrency
revolving facility to be used for general corporate purposes,
expired undrawn at its final maturity on September 23, 2009.
In June 2009, local financial institutions granted working
capital and project loan facilities to Infineon Technologies
(Wuxi) Co. Ltd. amounting to a total of $141 million
(97 million). These multi-year facilities are
available for general corporate purposes and the expansion of
manufacturing facilities in Wuxi, China, including intragroup
asset transfers. As of September 30, 2009, these facilities
remained unused and are partially secured by an asset pledge and
a corporate guarantee.
The Company has established independent financing arrangements
with several financial institutions, in the form of both short-
and long-term credit facilities, which are available for various
funding purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of financial
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
institution
|
|
Purpose/
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term
|
|
commitment
|
|
intended use
|
|
facility
|
|
|
Drawn
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Short-term
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
general corporate purposes, working capital, guarantees
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Short-term
|
|
no firm commitment
|
|
working capital, cash management
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Long-term(1)
|
|
firm commitment
|
|
project finance
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Including current maturities.
|
Interest expense incurred in connection with financial debt for
the years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, was
129 million, 138 million and
123 million, respectively.
F-51
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Aggregate amounts of debt maturing subsequent to
September 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ending September 30,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
521
|
|
2011
|
|
|
78
|
|
2012
|
|
|
66
|
|
2013
|
|
|
40
|
|
2014
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.
|
Other Financial
Liabilities
|
Other non-current financial liabilities at September 30,
2008 and 2009 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Settlement for antitrust related matters (note 38)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities at September 30, 2008 and
2009 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred income (note 26)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Deferred government grants (note 7)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Share
Capital
As of September 30, 2009 the Company had 1,086,742,085
registered ordinary shares, notional value 2.00 per share,
outstanding. During the year ended September 30, 2008, the
Company increased its share capital by 26,900 by issuing
13,450 ordinary shares in connection with the Companys
Long-Term Incentive Plans. During the year ended
September 30, 2009, no ordinary shares have been issued in
connection with the Companys Long Term Incentive Plans. On
August 5, 2009, the Company increased its share capital in
a first step by 645,653,928 by issuing
322,826,964 shares from the Authorized Capital 2007
(registered in the Commercial Register as Authorized
Capital 2007/I) resolved on February 15, 2007 and
part of the Authorized Capital 2009/I resolved on
February 12, 2009. The new shares were offered to
Infineons shareholders for subscription at a ratio of four
new shares for every nine existing shares held. After the
execution of the first step of the capital increase, the share
capital consisted of 2,145,138,098. In a second step, on
August 11, 2009, the Company further increased its share
capital by
F-52
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
28,346,072 by issuing 14,173,036 shares resulting
from the Authorized Capital 2009/I resolved on February 12,
2009. The new shares were issued to Admiral Participations
(Luxembourg) S.a.r.l. After these capital increases, the share
capital consisted of 2,173,484,170. As a result of the
capital increase, the Companys share capital increased by
674 million.
Additional-Paid-in-Capital
The Additional-paid-in-Capital increased by
6 million, net of costs incurred of
45 million, in connection with the capital increase.
Authorized and
Conditional Share Capital
The Authorized Capital II/2004 expired on January 19, 2009.
Furthermore, the capital increases in August 2009 were
implemented by utilizing all of the Companys Authorized
Capitals 2007 and 2009/I. Therefore, the Companys articles
of association currently do not provide for an authorized
capital.
Conditional
Capital
The Companys conditional capital recorded in the
Commercial Register amounts to 665,335,548. It has been
created through six conditional capital increases:
|
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital I (registered in the Commercial Register as
Conditional Capital 1999/I) pursuant to
Section 4(4) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of up to 34.6 million that may be used
to issue up to 17.3 million new registered shares in
connection with the Companys 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital III (registered in the Commercial
Register as Conditional Capital 2001/I) pursuant to
Section 4(6) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of up to 29 million that may be used
to issue up to 14.5 million new registered shares in
connection with the Companys 2001 and 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plans;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2002 (registered in the Commercial Register
as Conditional Capital 2007/II) pursuant to
Section 4(7) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of up to 152 million that may be used
to issue up to 76 million new registered shares upon
conversion of debt securities issued in June 2003;
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2007 (registered in the Commercial Register
as Conditional Capital 2007/I) pursuant to
Section 4(5) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of 149.9 million that may be used to
issue up to 74.95 million new registered shares upon
conversion of debt securities, which the Company may issue at
any time prior to February 14, 2012;*
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2008 (registered in the Commercial Register
as Conditional Capital 2008/I) pursuant to
Section 4(8) of the Articles of Association in an aggregate
nominal amount of 149.9 million that may be used to
issue up to 74.95 million new registered shares upon
conversion of debt securities, which the Company may issue at
any time prior to February 13, 2013;*
|
|
|
|
Conditional Capital 2009/I pursuant to Section 4(9) of the
Articles of Association in an aggregate nominal amount of
149.9 million that may be used to issue up to
74.95 million new registered shares upon conversion of
convertible bonds issued in May 2009.
|
|
|
* |
Due to the issuance of the convertible bonds in May 2009 which
are covered by the Conditional Capital 2009/I, additional debt
securities convertible into shares of the Company may not be
issued under authorizations existing as of September 30,
2009. Accordingly, shares may not be issued from Conditional
Capitals 2007 and 2008.
|
F-53
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Other
Components of Equity
The changes in other components of equity for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Pretax
|
|
|
effect
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net
income or loss
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other components of equity
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
Under the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz),
the amount of dividends available for distribution to
shareholders is based on the level of earnings
(Bilanzgewinn) of the ultimate parent, as determined in
accordance with the HGB. All dividends must be approved by
shareholders.
No dividends were paid in the 2007 or 2008 fiscal years. No
earnings are available for distribution as a dividend for the
2009 fiscal year, since Infineon Technologies AG on a
stand-alone basis as the ultimate parent incurred a cumulative
loss (Bilanzverlust) as of September 30, 2009.
Subject to market conditions, Infineon intends to retain future
earnings for investment in the development and expansion of its
business.
Minority
Interests
ALTIS is a joint venture between the Company and IBM, with each
having equal voting representation. In December 2005, the
Company further amended its agreements with IBM in respect of
the ALTIS joint venture and began to fully consolidate ALTIS,
whereby IBMs 50 percent ownership interest is
reflected as minority interest (see note 5).
Effective May 1, 2006, the Company contributed
substantially all of the operations of its memory products
segment, including the assets and liabilities that were used
exclusively for these operations, to Qimonda, a stand-alone
legal company. On August 9, 2006, Qimonda completed an
initial public offering on the New York Stock Exchange through
the issuance of 42 million ADSs at an offering price of $13
per ADS. The ADSs traded under the symbol QI on the
New York Stock Exchange until March 2009. In addition, the
Company sold 6.3 million Qimonda ADSs upon exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option. As a result of these
transactions, the Company reduced its shareholding in Qimonda to
85.9 percent. During the fourth quarter of the 2007 fiscal
year, Infineon sold an additional 28.75 million Qimonda
ADSs, further reducing its ownership interest in Qimonda to
77.5 percent. The minority investors
F-54
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
ownership interest in Qimonda of 22.5 percent as of
September 30, 2008 is reflected as minority interest.
During the second quarter of the 2009 fiscal year the Company
deconsolidated Qimonda as a result of Qimondas application
to commence insolvency proceedings (see note 5). Thus no
minority ownership interest relating to Qimonda is included in
the Companys consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009.
The key objective of the Companys capital management is to
ensure financial flexibility on the basis of a sound capital
structure. In line with peer companies in the industry, there is
a strong emphasis on liquidity in order to finance operations
and make planned capital expenditures throughout the business
cycle. The sources of liquidity are cash flows generated from
operations, cash on hand, and available credit facilities as
well as the occasional issuance and sale of securities on the
capital markets.
The Company is not subject to any statutory capital
requirements. Its capital management during the year ended
September 30, 2008 was based on financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP), since these were the primary
accounting standards used by the Company during that period.
Starting October 1, 2008, with the implementation of IFRS
as primary accounting standards, the Companys capital
management is based solely on IFRS. The Companys capital
management, its objectives and definitions of ratios, remained
unchanged when switching from U.S. GAAP to IFRS at the
beginning of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
Infineon considers its net cash position or net debt position,
as the case may be, defined as gross cash position less the sum
of short-term and long-term debt, as the principal indication of
its liquidity position. Gross cash position is defined as the
sum of cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale financial
assets. Infineons key goal in terms of capital management
is maintaining a net cash position in combination with a ratio
of gross cash position to sales of approximately 20 percent
to 25 percent. Furthermore, Infineon manages its capital
structure primarily by the ratio of
short-term
and
long-term
debt-to-EBITDA
which should normally not exceed 2. Infineon defines EBIT as
earnings (loss) before income (loss) from discontinued
operations, interest, and taxes. EBITDA is defined as EBIT plus
depreciation and amortization.
The Company recalculated these key ratios of capital management
using IFRS financial data for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, which had been previously computed
using U.S. GAAP financial data, only for the purpose of
presenting a comparison based on IFRS of the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009.
The various refinancing measures undertaken in the 2009 fiscal
year, most notably the capital increase executed in August 2009
(see note 30), have contributed to a significant
improvement of Infineons liquidity position and capital
structure. This is evidenced by the fact that for the year ended
September 30, 2008, Infineon had a net debt position of
287 million (366 million on a
U.S. GAAP basis, the difference primarily owing to the
bifurcation of outstanding convertible and exchangeable
subordinated notes into their debt and equity components under
IFRS), whereas for the year ended September 30, 2009,
Infineon had a net cash position of 657 million. This
development was mainly due to net proceeds of
680 million from the capital increase, positive
cash-flow from operations in excess of expenditures for
investing purposes and, to a lesser extent, repurchases of
outstanding convertible and exchangeable subordinated notes
below their carrying amount. The ratio of gross cash position to
sales amounted to 23 percent (identical to U.S. GAAP)
for the year ended September 30, 2008 and amounted to
50 percent for the year ended September 30, 2009.
Included in gross cash position are funds that will be needed to
redeem the remaining outstanding convertible subordinated notes
issued in 2003 at maturity in June 2010. For the year ended
September 30, 2008, the
short-term
and
long-term
debt-to-EBITDA
ratio of Infineon (excluding Qimonda) was 2.3 (on a
U.S. GAAP basis, 2.6). For the year ended
September 30, 2009, the
short-term
and
long-term
debt-to-EBITDA
ratio of Infineon (excluding Qimonda) deteriorated to 2.9 based
F-55
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
on significantly negative EBIT of 226 million, the
impact of which was only partially offset by the reduction of
debt through scheduled amortizations of credit facilities and
the repurchases and redemptions of outstanding convertible
subordinated and exchangeable subordinated notes, in excess of
the proceeds of new convertible subordinated notes due 2014 that
were issued in May 2009.
|
|
32.
|
Share-based
Compensation
|
In 1999, the Companys shareholders approved a long-term
incentive plan, which provided for the granting of
non-transferable options to acquire ordinary shares over a
future period. Under the terms of the LTI 1999 Plan, the Company
could grant up to 48 million options over a five-year
period. The exercise price of each option equals
120 percent of the average closing price of the
Companys stock during the five trading days prior to the
grant date. Granted options vest at the date on which the
Companys stock reaches the exercise price for at least one
trading day but not before the end of a two-year restriction
period. Options expire seven years from the grant date. The
outstanding options under this plan expired during the 2008
fiscal year.
In 2001, the Companys shareholders approved the
International Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTI 2001
Plan) which replaced the LTI 1999 Plan. Options previously
issued under the LTI 1999 Plan remain unaffected as to terms and
conditions; however, no additional options may be issued under
the LTI 1999 Plan. Under the terms of the LTI 2001 Plan, the
Company could grant up to 51.5 million options over a
five-year period. The exercise price of each option equals
105 percent of the average closing price of the
Companys stock during the five trading days prior to the
grant date. Granted options have a vesting period of between two
and four years, subject to the Companys stock reaching the
exercise price on at least one trading day, and expire seven
years from the grant date.
Under the LTI 2001 Plan, the Companys Supervisory Board
decided annually within 45 days after publication of the
financial results how many options to grant to the Management
Board. The Management Board, within the same period, decided how
many options to grant to eligible employees.
In 2006, the Companys shareholders approved the Stock
Option Plan 2006 (SOP 2006) which replaced the
LTI 2001 Plan. Under the terms of SOP 2006, the Company can
grant up to 13 million options over a three-year period.
The exercise price of each option equals 120 percent of the
average closing price of the Companys stock during the
five trading days prior to the grant date. Granted options are
only exercisable if the price of a share exceeds the trend of
the comparative index Philadelphia Semiconductor Index
(SOX) for at least three consecutive days on at
least one occasion during the life of the option. Granted
options have a vesting period of three years, subject to the
Companys stock reaching the exercise price on at least one
trading day, and expire six years from the grant date.
Under the SOP 2006, the Supervisory Board will decide
annually within a period of 45 days after publication of
the annual results or the results of the first or second
quarters of a fiscal year, but no later than two weeks before
the end of the quarter, how many options to grant to the
Management Board. During that same period the Management Board
may grant options to other eligible employees.
At the discretion of the Company, exercised options of the LTI
2001 Plan and SOP 2006 can be satisfied with shares either
by issuing shares from the Conditional Share Capital
I and Conditional Share Capital III for the
LTI 2001 Plan or from the Conditional Share Capital
III and Conditional Share Capital IV/2006 for
the SOP 2006 or by transferring own shares held by the
Company.
F-56
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
A summary of the status of the LTI 1999 Plan, the LTI 2001 Plan,
and the SOP 2006 as of September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, and changes during the fiscal years then ended are
presented below (options in millions, exercise price in Euro,
intrinsic value in millions of Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
Aggregated
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
intrinsic value
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
16.17
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
37.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
12.30
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, net of estimated forfeitures at
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
12.32
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
12.30
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
16.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, net of estimated forfeitures at
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
9.22
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
9.74
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2009
(options in millions, exercise prices in Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average
|
|
Range of exercise prices
|
|
options
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
Under 5
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 10
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
8.72
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
8.78
|
|
10 15
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
9.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options with an aggregate fair value of 32 million,
26 million and 10 million vested during
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively. Options with a total intrinsic value of
6 million, 0 million and 0 were
exercised during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007,
2008 and 2009, respectively.
F-57
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Changes in the Companys unvested options for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 are summarized as
follows (options in millions, fair values in Euro, intrinsic
value in millions of Euro):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
average grant
|
|
|
remaining life
|
|
|
Aggregated
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
date fair value
|
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
intrinsic value
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested options expected to vest
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested options expected to vest
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
4.34
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
The fair value of each option grant issued pursuant to the 1999
and 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plans was estimated on the grant
date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For options
granted prior to October 1, 2005, Infineon relied on
historical volatility measures when estimating the fair value of
stock options granted to employees. For options granted after
October 1, 2005, Infineon uses a combination of implied
volatilities from traded options on Infineons ordinary
shares and historical volatility when estimating the fair value
of stock options granted to employees, as it believes that this
methodology better reflects the expected future volatility of
its stock. The expected life of options granted was estimated
based on historical experience.
The fair value of each option grant issued pursuant to the Stock
Option Plan 2006 was estimated on the grant date using a Monte
Carlo simulation model. This model takes into account vesting
conditions relating to the performance of the SOX and its impact
on stock option fair value. The Company uses a combination of
implied volatilities from traded options on Infineons
ordinary shares and historical volatility when estimating the
fair value of stock options granted to employees, as it believes
that this methodology better reflects the expected future
volatility of its stock. The expected life of options granted
was estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation model.
For options granted after October 1, 2005, forfeitures are
estimated based on historical experience; prior to that date,
forfeitures were recorded as they occurred. The risk-free rate
is based on Treasury note yields at the time of grant for the
estimated life of the option. Infineon has not made any dividend
payments during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
F-58
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the fair
value calculation during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2009 as there was no issuance during
the 2008 fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.91%
|
|
|
|
1.88%
|
|
Expected volatility, underlying shares
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
|
67%
|
|
Expected volatility, SOX index
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
Forfeiture rate, per year
|
|
|
3.40%
|
|
|
|
3.40%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
Weighted-average fair value per option at grant date in
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, there was a total of
2 million in unrecognized compensation expense
related to unvested stock options of Infineon, which is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.22 years.
Share-Based
Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense was allocated as follows for
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Compensation expense recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation effect on basic and diluted loss per
shares in
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No cash was received from stock option exercises during the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. The amount
of share-based compensation expense which was capitalized and
remained in inventories for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 was immaterial.
Share-based compensation expense does not reflect any income tax
benefits, since stock options are granted in tax jurisdictions
where the expense is not deductible for tax purposes.
|
|
33.
|
Supplemental Cash
Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molstanda (note 4)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molstanda (note 4)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company has transactions in the normal course of business
with Equity Method Investments and related persons such as
members of the Management and Supervisory Boards (collectively,
Related Parties). The Company purchases certain of
its raw materials, especially chipsets, from, and sells certain
of its products to, Related Parties. Purchases and sales to
Related Parties are generally based on market prices or
manufacturing cost plus a
mark-up.
Related Party receivables consist primarily of trade, financial,
and other receivables from Equity Method Investments and Related
Companies, and totaled 78 million and
9 million as of September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
Related Party payables consist primarily of trade, financial,
and other payables from Equity Method Investments, and totaled
21 million and 15 million as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Related Party receivables and payables as of September 30,
2008 and 2009 have been segregated first between amounts owed by
or to companies in which the Company has an ownership interest,
and second based on the underlying nature of the transactions.
Trade receivables and payables include amounts for the purchase
and sale of products and services. Financial and other
receivables and payables represent amounts owed relating to
loans and advances and accrue interest at interbank rates.
Sales to Related Parties totaled 57 million,
1 million and 2 million in the 2007, 2008
and 2009 fiscal years, respectively, whereas purchases from
Related Parties totaled 47 million,
148 million and 138 million in the 2007,
2008 and 2009 fiscal years, respectively.
Remuneration
of Management
In the 2009 fiscal year, the currently active members of the
Management Board of Infineon Technologies AG received total
compensation of 3.6 million (previous year:
3.3 million, pro rata for the duration of membership
on the Management Board during the fiscal year). The total
annual compensation for all active members of the Management
Board in the previous fiscal year amounted to
4.9 million and included the compensation for
Mr. Fischl and Dr. Ziebart who retired during the 2008
fiscal year. In the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years, no stock options
were granted to members of the Management Board. No
performance-related bonuses were paid for the 2008 and 2009
fiscal years. The total cash compensation in the 2009 fiscal
year paid to the current members of the Management Board amounts
to 3.6 million (previous year:
3.3 million).
The total aggregate cash compensation of the members of the
Supervisory Board of the Infineon Technologies AG in the 2009
fiscal year amounted to 0.5 million (previous year:
0.5 million). In the 2009 fiscal year, the members of
the Supervisory Board waived their share appreciations rights
for the 2009 fiscal year.
Former members of the Management Board received total payments
of 1.8 million (severance and pension payments) in
the 2009 fiscal year (previous year: 0.9 million).
As of September 30, 2009, pension liabilities for former
members of the Management Board amount to 27 million
(previous year: 27 million).
Neither Infineon Technologies AG nor any of its subsidiaries
have granted loans to any member of the Supervisory or
Management Boards.
F-60
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Pension benefits provided by the Company are currently organized
primarily through defined benefit pension plans which cover a
significant portion of the Companys employees. Plan
benefits are principally based upon years of service. Certain
pension plans are based on salary earned in the last year or
last five years of employment, while others are fixed plans
depending on ranking (both salary level and position). The
measurement date for the Companys pension plans is
September 30.
Information with respect to the Companys pension plans for
the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 is presented
for German (Domestic) plans and non-German
(Foreign) plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Change in defined benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of defined benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Current service cost
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Actuarial gains (losses)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
New plan created and plan amendments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Plan transfers to Qimonda
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of defined benefit obligation reclassified as held
for disposal
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of defined benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Contributions
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Plan transfers to Qimonda
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value plan assets reclassified as held for disposal
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
A reconciliation of the funded status of the Companys
pension plans to the amounts recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Present value of funded obligations
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset ceiling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset (liability) recognized
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Pension assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion pension liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset (liability) recognized
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The experience adjustments, meaning differences between changes
in assets and obligations expected on the basis of actuarial
assumptions and actual changes in those assets and obligations,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Differences between expected and actual developments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of fair value of the obligation
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
of fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
The actual return on plan assets was (43) million and
5 million in the years ended September 30, 2008
and 2009, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used in calculating the
actuarial values for the pension plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.8%
|
|
|
|
6.1%
|
|
|
|
5.8%
|
|
|
|
5.3%
|
|
Rate of salary increase
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
1.9%
|
|
Projected future pension increases
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
2.9%
|
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
7.0%
|
|
|
|
7.1%
|
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
F-62
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Discount rates are established based on prevailing market rates
for high-quality fixed-income instruments that, if the pension
benefit obligation were settled at the measurement date, would
provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the benefit
obligation when due. The Company believes short-term changes in
interest rates should not affect the measurement of the
Companys long-term obligation.
Investment
Strategies
The investment approach of the Companys pension plans
involves employing a sufficient level of flexibility to capture
investment opportunities as they occur, while maintaining
reasonable parameters to ensure that prudence and care are
exercised in the execution of the investment program. The
Companys pension plans assets are invested with
several investment managers. The plans employ a mix of active
and passive investment management programs. Considering the
duration of the underlying liabilities, a portfolio of
investments of plan assets in equity securities, debt securities
and other assets is targeted to maximize the long-term return on
assets for a given level of risk. Investment risk is monitored
on an ongoing basis through periodic portfolio reviews, meetings
with investment managers and annual liability measurements.
Investment policies and strategies are periodically reviewed to
ensure the objectives of the plans are met considering any
changes in benefit plan design, market conditions or other
material items.
Expected
Long-term Rate of Return on Plan Assets
Establishing the expected rate of return on pension assets
requires judgment. The Companys approach in determining
the long-term rate of return for plan assets is based upon
historical financial market relationships that have existed over
time; the types of investment classes in which pension plan
assets are invested, long-term investment strategies, as well as
the expected compounded return the Company can reasonably expect
the portfolio to earn over appropriate time periods.
The Company reviews the expected long-term rate of return
annually and revises it as appropriate. Also, the Company
periodically commissions detailed asset/liability studies to be
performed by third-party professional investment advisors and
actuaries.
Plan Asset
Allocation
As of September 30, 2008 and 2009 the percentage of plan
assets invested and the targeted allocation in major asset
categories are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Targeted allocation
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
41%
|
|
|
|
46%
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys asset allocation targets for its pension plan
assets are based on its assessment of business and financial
conditions, demographic and actuarial data, funding
characteristics, related risk factors, market sensitivity
analysis and other relevant factors. The overall allocation is
expected to help protect the plans funded status while
generating sufficiently stable real returns (i.e., net of
inflation) to meet current and future benefit payment needs. Due
to active portfolio management, the asset allocation may differ
from the target allocation up to certain limits for different
classes. As a matter of policy, the Companys pension plans
do not invest in shares of Infineon.
F-63
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The components of net periodic pension cost for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service (cost) benefit
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The past service costs relating to the pension plans are
amortized in equal amounts over the average period until the
benefits become vested.
Actuarial gains of 124 million, 0 million
and a loss of 62 million have been recognized in the
statement of recognized income and expense for the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 respectively.
It is not planned nor anticipated that any plan assets will be
returned to any business entity during the next fiscal year.
The effect of employee terminations in connection with the
Companys restructuring plans on the Companys pension
obligation is reflected as a curtailment in the years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 pursuant to the
provisions of IAS 19.
The interest cost due to the increase in the present value of
the defined benefit obligation during a period and the interest
income from the plan assets are shown as interest expense or
interest income. The remaining net periodic pension cost is
mainly attributed to cost of sales, research and development
costs and selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Company recognized 108 million,
105 million and 101 million as an expense
for defined contribution plans in the financial years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
F-64
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
36.
|
Additional
Disclosures on Financial Instruments
|
The following table presents the carrying amounts and the fair
values by class of financial instruments and reconciliation from
the classes of financial instruments to the IAS 39 categories of
financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Categories of financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
profit or
|
|
|
Designated cash
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Loans and
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
amount
|
|
|
loss
|
|
|
flow hedges
|
|
|
for sale
|
|
|
receivables
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
Other current financial assets
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
Available-for-sale
financial assets
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Trade and other receivables
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Other current financial assets
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial assets
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Categories of financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
Designated
|
|
|
financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
cash flow
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
profit or
|
|
|
hedges at
|
|
|
(amortized
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
amount
|
|
|
loss
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
cost)
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
Other current financial liabilities
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Other current financial liabilities
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Other financial liabilities
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table contains information about net gains
(losses) from continuing operations by category of financial
instruments for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at fair value through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as at fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-
|
|
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial
|
|
|
Loans and
|
|
|
profit or
|
|
|
Held for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) on financial instruments
|
|
assets
|
|
|
receivables
|
|
|
loss
|
|
|
trading
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
hedges
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total removed from equity and recognized in profit or loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Fair value gain (loss) recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) recognized in equity
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Fair value gain (loss)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Impairment loss (reversal)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gain (loss)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total removed from equity and recognized in profit or loss
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Fair value gain (loss) recognized directly in equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) recognized in equity
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest revenue
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Fair value gain (loss)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Impairment loss (reversal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in profit or loss
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gain (loss)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company periodically enters into derivative financial
instruments, including foreign currency forward and option
contracts as well as interest rate swap agreements. The
objective of these transactions is to reduce the impact of
interest rate and exchange rate fluctuations on the
Companys foreign currency
F-67
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
denominated net future cash flows. The Company does not enter
into derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
The Euro equivalent notional amounts in millions and fair values
of the Companys derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Forward contracts sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward contracts purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore dollar
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Britain pound
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysian ringgit
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Norwegian krone
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into derivative instruments, primarily
foreign exchange forward contracts, to hedge significant
anticipated U.S. dollar cash flows from operations. During
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company
designated as cash flow hedges certain foreign exchange forward
contracts and foreign exchange options related to highly
probable forecasted sales denominated in U.S. dollars. The
Company did not record any ineffectiveness for these hedges for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. However, it
excluded differences between spot and forward rates and the time
value from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and included
this component of financial instruments gain or loss as
part of cost of goods sold. It is estimated that
0 million of the net result recognized directly in
other components of equity as of September 30, 2009 will be
reclassified into earnings during the 2010 fiscal year. All
foreign exchange derivatives designated as cash flow hedges held
as of September 30, 2009 have maturities of five months or
less. Foreign exchange derivatives entered into by the Company
to offset exposure to anticipated cash flows that do not meet
the requirements for applying hedge accounting are marked to
market at each reporting period with unrealized gains and losses
recognized in earnings. For the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, no gains or losses were
reclassified from other components of equity as a result of the
discontinuance of foreign currency cash flow hedges resulting
from a determination that it was probable that the original
forecasted transaction would not occur.
F-68
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair
Value
Fair values of financial instruments are determined using quoted
market prices or discounted cash flows. The fair value of the
Companys unsecured term loans and interest-bearing notes
payable approximate their carrying values as their interest
rates approximate those which could be obtained currently. At
September 30, 2009, the subordinated convertible notes, due
2010 and 2014, were trading at a 0.45 percent and a
93.14 percent premium to par, respectively, based on quoted
market values. The fair values of the Companys cash and
cash equivalents, receivables and payables, as well as
related-party receivables and payables and other financial
instruments approximated their carrying values due to their
short-term nature. Available for sale financial assets are
recorded at fair value (see note 13).
|
|
37.
|
Financial Risk
Management
|
The Companys activities expose it to a variety of
financial risks: market risk (including foreign exchange risk,
interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity
risk. The Companys overall financial risk management
program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and
seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on its financial
performance. The Company uses derivative financial instruments
to hedge certain risk exposures. Risk management is carried out
by a central Finance and Treasury (FT) department
under policies approved by the Management Board. The FT
department identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risks in
close co-operation with the Companys operating units. The
FT departments policy contains written principles for
overall risk management, as well as written policies covering
specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate
risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and
non-derivative financial instruments, and investment of excess
liquidity.
Market
Risk
Market risk is defined as the risk of loss related to adverse
changes in market prices of financial instruments, including
those related to foreign exchange rates and interest rates.
The Company is exposed to various financial market risks in the
ordinary course of business transactions, primarily resulting
from changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The
Company enters into diverse derivative financial transactions
with several counterparties to limit such risks. Derivative
instruments are used only for hedging purposes and not for
trading or speculative purposes.
Foreign Exchange
Risk
Foreign exchange risk is the risk that the fair value of future
cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of
changes in foreign exchange rates.
Although the Company prepares the consolidated financial
statements in Euro, major portions of its sales volumes as well
as costs relating to the design, development, manufacturing and
marketing of products are denominated in currencies other than
the Euro, primarily the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in the
exchange rates of these currencies to the Euro had an effect on
results in the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years.
Management has established a policy to require the
Companys individual legal entities to manage their foreign
exchange risk against their functional currency. The legal
entities are required to internally hedge their entire foreign
exchange risk exposure with the Companys FT department. To
manage their foreign exchange risk arising from future
commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities,
the individual entities use forward contracts, transacted with
the Companys FT department.
The Companys policy with respect to limiting short-term
foreign currency exposure generally is to economically hedge at
least 75 percent of its estimated net exposure for the
initial two-month period, at least 50 percent of its
estimated net exposure for the third month and, depending on the
nature of the underlying transactions, a significant portion for
the periods thereafter. Part of the foreign currency
F-69
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
exposure cannot be mitigated due to differences between actual
and forecasted amounts. The Company calculates this net exposure
on a cash-flow basis considering balance sheet items, actual
orders received or made and all other planned revenues and
expenses.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, net
gains (losses) related to foreign currency derivatives and
foreign currency transactions included in determining net income
(loss) amounted to 15 million and
(11) million, respectively.
The following table shows the net exposure for continuing
operations by major foreign currencies and the potential effects
on a 10 percent shift of the currency exchange rates to be
applied as of September 30, 2008 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit or Loss
|
|
Equity
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
+10%
|
|
−10%
|
|
+10%
|
|
−10%
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
EUR/USD
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
EUR/MYR
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR/YEN
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR/SGD
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit or Loss
|
|
Equity
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
+10%
|
|
−10%
|
|
+10%
|
|
−10%
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
EUR/USD
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
EUR/MYR
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR/YEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR/SGD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
Risk
In accordance with IFRS 7 interest rate risk is defined as the
risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial
instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest
rates.
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk through its
financial assets and debt instruments resulting from issuance of
bonds and credit facilities. Due to the high volatility of its
core business and the need to maintain high operational
flexibility, its liquid financial assets are kept at a high
level. These assets are mainly invested in short-term interest
rate instruments. The risk of changing interest rates affecting
these assets is partially offset by financial liabilities, some
of which are based on variable interest rates.
To reduce the risk caused by changes in market interest rates,
the Company attempts to align the duration of the interest rates
of its debts and current assets by the use of interest rate
derivatives.
The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that
primarily convert the fixed interest rate on its 2003
convertible bond to a floating interest rate based on the
relevant European Interbank Offering Rate (EURIBOR).
IFRS 7 requires a sensitivity analysis showing the effect of
possible changes in market interest on profit or loss and
equity. The Company does not hold any fixed-rate financial
assets or liabilities categorized as at fair value through
profit or loss and does not apply hedge accounting for interest
rate risk. In respect of fixed-rate
available-for-sale
financial assets, a change of 100 basis points in interest
rates at the reporting date would have increased or decreased
equity by 1 million and by 1 million as of
September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
F-70
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Changes in market interest rates affect interest income and
interest expense on floating interest financial instruments. A
change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the
reporting date would have increased or decreased profit or loss
by 4 million and by 2 million in the 2008
and 2009 fiscal year, respectively.
Changes in interest rates affect the fair value and cash flows
of interest rate derivatives. A change of 100 basis points
in interest rates at the reporting date would have decreased or
increased profit or loss by 12 million and by
3 million in the 2008 and 2009 fiscal year.
Other Price
Risk
According to IFRS 7 other price risk is defined as the risk that
the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument
will fluctuate because of changes in market prices (other than
those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether
those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual
financial instrument or its issuer, or factors affecting all
similar financial instruments traded in the market.
Infineon holds financial instruments which are exposed to market
price risks. A potential change of in the relevant market prices
of 5 percent would increase or decrease profit or loss by
4 million and 1 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Additionally, the Company is exposed to price risks with respect
to raw materials used in the manufacture of its products. The
Company seeks to minimize these risks through its sourcing
policies (including the use of multiple sources, where possible)
and its operating procedures. The Company does not use
derivative financial instruments to manage any exposure to
fluctuations in commodity prices remaining after the operating
measures described above.
Credit
Risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument
will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to
discharge an obligation.
Financial instruments that expose the Company to credit risk
consist primarily of trade receivables, cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
financial assets and financial derivatives. Concentrations of
credit risks with respect to trade receivables are limited by
the large number of geographically diverse customers that make
up the Companys customer base. The Company controls credit
risk through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring
procedures, as well as comprehensive credit evaluations for all
customers. The credit risk with respect to cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
financial assets and financial derivatives is limited by
transactions with a number of large international financial
institutions, with pre-established limits. The Company does not
believe that there is significant risk of non-performance by
these counterparties because the Company monitors their credit
risk and limits the financial exposure and the amounts of
agreements entered into with any one financial institution. The
credit worthiness of the counterparties is checked regularly in
order to keep the risk of default as low as possible. However,
the Company cannot fully exclude the possibility of any loss
arising from the default of one of the counterparties.
Liquidity
Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity will encounter
difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial
liabilities.
Liquidity risk could arise from the Companys potential
inability to meet matured financial obligations. The
Companys liquidity risk management implies maintaining
sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of
funding through an adequate amount of committed credit
facilities and the ability to close out market positions. Due to
the dynamic nature of the underlying businesses, the
Companys FT department maintains flexibility in funding by
maintaining availability under committed credit lines.
F-71
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table discloses a maturity analysis for
non-derivative financial liabilities and a cash flow analysis
for derivative financial instruments with negative fair values.
The table shows the undiscounted contractually agreed cash flows
which result from the respective financial liability. Cash flows
are recognized at trade date when the Company becomes a party to
the contractual provision of the financial instrument. Amounts
in foreign currencies are translated using the closing rate at
the reporting date. Financial instruments with variable interest
payments are determined using the interest rate from the last
interest fixing date before September 30, 2009. The cash
outflows of financial liabilities that can be paid off at any
time are assigned to the time band where the earliest redemption
is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash flows
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non derivative financial liabilities
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash outflow
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
inflow(1)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Cash inflows of derivates financial liabilities are also
included when the instruments is gross settled in order to show
all contractual cash flows.
|
|
|
38.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
Litigation and
Government Inquiries
U.S. Department
of Justice Matter
In September 2004, the Company entered into a plea agreement
with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) in connection with its investigation
into alleged antitrust violations in the DRAM industry. Pursuant
to this plea agreement, the Company agreed to plead guilty to a
single count of conspiring with other unspecified DRAM
manufacturers to fix the prices of DRAM products during certain
periods of time between July 1, 1999 and June 15,
2002, and to pay a fine of $160 million (plus interest) in
annual installments through 2009. The final installment of
$25 million plus interest (approximately
17 million) was paid in October 2009. The Company has
agreed to continue cooperating with the DOJ in its ongoing
investigation of other participants in the DRAM industry. The
price-fixing charges related to DRAM sales to six Original
Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) customers that
manufacture computers and servers. The Company has settled with
the OEM customers. In addition to those OEM customers, the
Company has settled with eight direct customers.
Antitrust
Litigation
Subsequent to the commencement of the DOJ investigation, a
number of putative class action lawsuits were filed in
U.S. federal courts against the Company, its
U.S. subsidiary Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
(IF North America) and other DRAM suppliers by
direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and various
U.S. state attorneys general. The lawsuits allege
price-fixing in violation of the Sherman Act and seek treble
damages in unspecified amounts, costs, attorneys fees, and
an injunction against the allegedly unlawful conduct. In
September 2002, these federal cases were transferred to the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings as part of
a Multi District Litigation (MDL).
F-72
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In September 2005, the Company and IF North America entered into
a definitive settlement agreement with counsel for the class of
direct U.S. purchasers of DRAM (granting an opportunity for
individual class members to opt out of the settlement). In
November 2006, the court approved the settlement agreement,
entered final judgment and dismissed the claims with prejudice.
Six entities chose to opt out of the class action settlement of
the direct customers and pursue individual lawsuits against the
Company and IF North America. The Company and IF North America
have settled with all six plaintiffs.
Sixty-four additional cases were filed through October 2005 in
numerous federal and state courts throughout the U.S. Each
of these state and federal cases (except for one relating to
foreign purchasers described below) purports to be on behalf of
a class of individuals and entities who indirectly purchased
DRAM products in the U.S. during specified time periods
commencing in or after 1999. The complaints variously allege
violations of the Sherman Act, Californias Cartwright Act,
various other state laws, unfair competition law, and unjust
enrichment and seek treble damages in generally unspecified
amounts, restitution, costs, attorneys fees and
injunctions against the allegedly unlawful conduct.
The foreign purchasers case was dismissed with prejudice
and without leave to amend in March 2006, which was affirmed in
August 2008 by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Twenty-three of the state and federal court cases were
subsequently ordered transferred to the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California for coordinated and
consolidated pretrial proceedings as part of the MDL proceeding
described above. Nineteen of the twenty-three transferred cases
are currently pending in the MDL litigation. The pending
California state cases were coordinated and transferred to
San Francisco County Superior Court for pre-trial
proceedings. The plaintiffs in the indirect purchaser cases
outside California agreed to stay proceedings in those cases in
favor of proceedings on the indirect purchaser cases pending as
part of the MDL pre-trial proceedings.
In January 2008, the district court in the MDL indirect
purchaser proceedings granted in part and denied in part the
defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings directed
at several of the claims. In June 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals agreed to hear an appeal by the plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs have agreed to a stay of further proceedings in the
MDL indirect purchaser cases until the appeal is complete.
Plaintiffs in various state court indirect purchaser actions
outside of the MDL have moved to lift the stays that were
previously in place. In March 2009, the judge in the Arizona
state court action issued an order denying plaintiffs
motion to lift the stay. A hearing on plaintiffs motion to
lift the stay in the Minnesota state court indirect purchaser
action was held in May 2009, but no ruling has yet been issued.
On September 11, 2009, the court in the Arkansas state
action issued an order directing the parties to submit to
mediation within ninety days, and granting plaintiffs
motion to lift the stay after the ninety day period. On
July 9, 2009, the court in the Wisconsin state court
indirect purchaser action issued an order lifting the stay in
the Wisconsin state case. On October 20, 2009, the court in
the West Virginia state court indirect purchaser action issued
an order lifting the stay in the West Virginia state case.
The state attorneys general of forty-one U.S. states and
territories have filed various suits against the Company, IF
North America and several other DRAM manufacturers on behalf of
governmental entities and consumers in each of those states who
purchased products containing DRAM beginning in 1998. The
plaintiffs allege violations of state and federal antitrust laws
arising out of the same allegations of DRAM price-fixing and
artificial price inflation practices discussed above, and seek
recovery of actual and treble damages in unspecified amounts,
penalties, costs (including attorneys fees) and injunctive
and other equitable relief. The various suits filed by these
attorneys general have been made part of the MDL proceeding
described above. Between June 2007 and December 2008, the state
attorneys general of eight states filed requests for dismissal
of their claims. In September 2008, the court denied a joint
motion by California and New Mexico seeking to certify classes
of all public entities within both states.
F-73
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In October 2008, approximately ninety-five California schools,
political subdivisions and public agencies that were previously
putative class members of the multistate attorneys general
complaint described above filed suit in California Superior
Court against the Company, IF North America, and several other
DRAM manufacturers alleging DRAM price-fixing and artificial
price inflation in violation of California state antitrust and
consumer protection laws arising out of the alleged practices
described above. The plaintiffs seek recovery of actual and
treble damages in unspecified amounts, restitution, costs
(including attorneys fees) and injunctive and other
equitable relief. This suit is ongoing.
No reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at this time to
the potential outcome of the claims described above. In
addition, certain of these matters are currently subject to
mediation, pursuant to which the parties are prohibited from
disclosing potential settlement amounts.
Between December 2004 and February 2005, two putative class
proceedings were filed in the Canadian province of Quebec, and
one was filed in each of Ontario and British Columbia against
the Company, IF North America and other DRAM manufacturers on
behalf of all direct and indirect purchasers resident in Canada
who purchased DRAM or products containing DRAM between July 1999
and June 2002, seeking damages, investigation and administration
costs, as well as interest and legal costs. Plaintiffs primarily
allege conspiracy to unduly restrain competition and to
illegally fix the price of DRAM. No reasonable estimated amount
can be attributed at this time to the potential outcome of the
putative class proceedings.
Other Government
Inquiries
In April 2003, the Company received a request for information
from the European Commission (the Commission)
regarding certain competitive practices of which the Commission
has become aware in the European market for DRAM products. The
Commission opened formal proceedings in February 2009. The
Company is cooperating with the Commission in its investigation.
The exact amount of potential fines cannot be predicted with
certainty and, therefore, it is possible that any fine actually
imposed on the Company by the Commission may be materially
higher than the provision recorded therefor. Any disclosure of
the Companys estimate of potential outcome could seriously
prejudice the position of the Company in this investigation.
In May 2004, the Canadian Competition Bureau advised IF North
America that it, its affiliates and present and past directors,
officers and employees are among the targets of a formal inquiry
into an alleged conspiracy to prevent or lessen competition
unduly in the production, manufacture, sale or supply of DRAM,
contrary to the Canadian Competition Act. No formal steps (such
as subpoenas) have been taken by the Competition Bureau to date.
The Company is cooperating with the Competition Bureau in its
inquiry. No reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at
this time to the potential outcome of these inquiries.
In October 2008, the Company learned that the Commission had
commenced an investigation involving the Companys Chip
Card & Security business for alleged violations of
antitrust laws. In September and October 2009, the Company and
its French subsidiary received written requests for information
from the Commission. The Company is cooperating with the
Commission in answering the requests. No reasonable estimated
amount can be attributed at this time to the potential outcome
of this investigation.
Securities
Litigation
Between September and November 2004, seven securities class
action complaints were filed against the Company and current or
former officers in U.S. federal district courts, later
consolidated in the Northern District of California, on behalf
of a putative class of investors that purchased the
Companys publicly-traded securities from March 2000 to
July 2004. The consolidated amended complaint alleges violations
of
F-74
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
the U.S. securities laws and asserts that the defendants
made materially false and misleading public statements about the
Companys historical and projected financial results and
competitive position because they did not disclose the
Companys alleged participation in DRAM price-fixing
activities. The complaint also alleges that, by fixing the price
of DRAM, defendants manipulated the price of the Companys
securities, thereby injuring its shareholders. The plaintiffs
seek unspecified compensatory damages, interest, costs and
attorneys fees. In January 2008, the court denied a motion
to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs claims under
sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and dismissed the claim under
section 20A of the act with prejudice. In March 2009, the
court granted plaintiffs motion to certify a class of
persons who acquired the Companys securities between March
2000 and July 2004, including foreign purchasers who sold their
securities after June 2002. In April 2009, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals granted the Companys petition to
immediately appeal the courts March 2009 order granting
class certification. In May 2009, the court issued an order
staying the case pending resolution of the Companys appeal
by the Ninth Circuit. No specified amount of damages has been
asserted by the plaintiffs. These matters are currently subject
to mediation.
The Companys directors and officers insurance
carriers have denied coverage in the securities class action
described above and the Company filed suit against the carriers
in December 2005 and August 2006. The Companys claims
against one D&O insurance carrier were finally dismissed in
May 2007. The claim against the other insurance carrier is still
pending.
Patent
Litigation
In October 2007, CIF Licensing LLC (CIF), a member
of the General Electric Group, filed suit in the Civil Court of
Düsseldorf, Germany against Deutsche Telekom AG alleging
infringement of four European patents in Germany by certain
CPE-modems and ADSL-systems (the CIF Suit). Deutsche
Telecom has notified its suppliers, which include customers of
the Company, that a declaratory judgment of patent infringement
would be legally binding on the suppliers. In January 2008, the
Company joined the suit on the side of Deutsche Telecom. CIF
then filed suit against the Company alleging indirect
infringement of one of the four European patents. The Company is
part of a joint defense group consisting of Deutsche Telecom,
most of its suppliers and most of their respective suppliers.
The Company is contractually obligated to indemnify
and/or to
pay damages to its customers under certain circumstances
pursuant to its customer contracts. In July 2008, Deutsche
Telecom, the Company and the other defendants filed actions
contesting the validity of the four patents before the Federal
Patent Court in Munich. In October 2008, CIF also filed suit in
the Civil Court of Düsseldorf against Arcor
GmbH &Co KG, Hansenet Telekommunikation GmbH, United
Internet AG (all three, the New Defendants) alleging
infringement of the same four European patents. The New
Defendants have notified their suppliers of the suit. The
proceedings at the Civil Court in Düsseldorf have been
stayed and the Company expects that they will only continue
after resolution of the pending Federal Patent Court actions. No
specified amount of damages has been asserted by CIF in these
suits. Any disclosure of Companys estimate of potential
outcomes, if such amounts could reasonably be estimated at this
time, could seriously prejudice the position of the Company in
these suits.
In November 2008, Volterra Semiconductor Corporation
(Volterra) filed suit against Primarion, Inc., the
Company and IF North America (the Defendants) in the
U.S District Court for the Northern District of California for
alleged infringement of five U.S. patents
(Patents) by certain products offered by Primarion.
The Defendants denied any infringement and filed a counterclaim
against Volterra alleging certain antitrust violations, fraud on
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(U.S. PTO) and that the Patents are invalid.
The U.S. PTO granted the requested reexamination of all
Patents. In June 2009, the court ordered a stay in the case
regarding two of the Patents pending the completion of the
reexamination proceedings. On July 10, 2009, Volterra filed
motions for a preliminary injunction and for partial summary
judgment of infringement. On September 30, 2009, the court
issued a minute order granting Volterras motion for a
preliminary injunction and denying the motion for partial
summary judgment without prejudice. The Defendants intend
F-75
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
to appeal the order and apply for a stay of the injunction once
it is issued with reasons. A trial date has not been set yet. No
specified amount of damages has been asserted by Volterra and no
reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at this time to
the potential outcome of the Volterra claim.
In November 2008, the Company, Infineon Technologies Austria AG
and IF North America filed a complaint in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Delaware against Fairchild
Semiconductor International, Inc. and Fairchild Semiconductor
Corporation alleging patent infringement by Fairchild and
seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity
of certain patents of Fairchild. Fairchild counterclaimed for
declaratory judgment. Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation has
further filed another patent infringement suit against the
Company and IF North America in the U.S. District Court for
the District of Maine alleging that certain products of the
Company infringe two more patents of Fairchild Semiconductor
Corporation which are not part of the Delaware lawsuit. On
September 30, 2009, the District Court for the District of
Delaware granted the Companys motion for leave to amend
its complaint to add the patents asserted by Fairchild in the
District of Maine to the Delaware action. Subsequently, the
District of Maine transferred the Maine action to the District
of Delaware and closed the Maine action. No specified amount of
damages has been asserted by Fairchild and no reasonable
estimated amount can be attributed at this time to the potential
outcome of its counterclaim.
In April 2009, Optimum Processing Solutions LLC
(OPS), a Georgia limited liability company, filed a
claim in the U.S. Federal District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia against IF North America, Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Intel Corporation,
International Business Machines Corporation, STMicroelectronics,
Inc., Sun Microsystems, Inc. and Texas Instruments, Inc. The
complaint alleges that certain microchips manufactured, used or
offered for sale by IF North America and the other defendants
infringe U.S. patent no. 5,117,497, allegedly held by
the plaintiff. On July 10, 2009, IF North America and OPS
settled the patent litigation claim.
In May 2009, Gregory Bender filed suit in the U.S. District
Court for the Northern District of California, against four
companies, including IF North America, alleging infringement of
one U.S. patent by certain electronic products having a
buffered amplifier. No specified amount of damages has been
asserted by the plaintiff and no reasonable estimated amount can
be attributed at this time to the potential outcome of this
claim.
Qimonda
Employment Litigation
In April 2009, former employees of Qimondas subsidiaries
in the U.S. filed a complaint in the U.S. Federal
District Court in Delaware against the Company, IF North America
and Qimonda AG, individually and on behalf of several putative
classes of plaintiffs. The suit relates to the termination of
the plaintiffs employment in connection with
Qimondas insolvency and the payment of severance and other
benefits allegedly due by Qimonda. The complaint seeks to
pierce the corporate veil and to impose liability on
the Company and IF North America under several theories. No
specified amount of damages has been asserted by the plaintiffs
and no reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at this
time to the potential outcome of the claim.
The Company and its subsidiary Infineon Dresden are subject to
lawsuits by approximately 70 former Infineon employees who were
transferred to Qimonda or Qimonda Dresden as part of the
carve-out and who seek to be re-employed by the Company. No
reasonable estimated amount can be attributed at this time to
the potential outcome of any such claims.
Provisions and
the Potential Effect of these Matters
Provisions related to legal proceedings are recorded when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the associated
amount can be reasonably estimated. Where the estimated amount
of loss is within a range of amounts and no amount within the
range is a better estimate than any other amount, the
F-76
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
mid-point of the range is accrued. As of September 30,
2009, provisions were recorded by the Company in connection with
the European antitrust investigation, the securities class
action complaints, and the direct and indirect purchaser
litigation described above.
As additional information becomes available, the potential
liability related to these matters will be reassessed and the
estimates revised, if necessary. Provisions with respect to
these matters would be subject to change in the future based on
new developments in each matter, or changes in circumstances,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
An adverse final resolution of any of the investigations or
lawsuits described above could result in significant financial
liability to, and other adverse effects on, the Company, which
would have a material adverse effect on its results of
operations, financial condition and cash flows. In each of these
matters, the Company is continuously evaluating the merits of
the respective claims and defending itself vigorously or seeking
to arrive at alternative resolutions in the best interest of the
Company, as it deems appropriate. Irrespective of the validity
or the successful assertion of the claims described above, the
Company could incur significant costs with respect to defending
against or settling such claims, which could have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
The Company is subject to various other lawsuits, legal actions,
claims and proceedings related to products, patents,
environmental matters, and other matters incidental to its
businesses. The Company has accrued a liability for the
estimated costs of adjudication of various asserted and
unasserted claims existing as of the balance sheet date. Based
upon information presently known to management, the Company does
not believe that the ultimate resolution of such other pending
matters will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position, although the final resolution
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations or cash flows in the period
of settlement.
Qimonda
Matters
The Company faces certain contingent liabilities, and has made
certain related provisions, in connection with the commencement
of insolvency proceedings by Qimonda. For information on these
matters see note 5.
F-77
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Contractual
Commitments
The following table summarizes the Companys commitments
with respect to external parties as of September 30,
2009(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-2 years
|
|
|
2-3 years
|
|
|
3-4 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Contractual Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
Unconditional purchase commitments tangible assets
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconditional purchase commitments intangible assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconditional purchase commitments other
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future interest payments
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commitments
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Certain payments of obligations or expirations of commitments
that are based on the achievement of milestones or other events
that are not date-certain are included for purposes of this
table based on estimates of the reasonably likely timing of
payments or expirations in the particular case. Actual outcomes
could differ from those estimates.
|
The Company has capacity reservation agreements with certain
Associated Companies and external foundry suppliers for the
manufacturing and testing of semiconductor products. These
agreements generally are greater than one year in duration and
are renewable. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company
has agreed to purchase a portion of their production output
based, in part, on market prices.
Purchases under these agreements are recorded as incurred in the
normal course of business. The Company assesses its anticipated
purchase requirements on a regular basis to meet customer demand
for its products. An assessment of losses under these agreements
is made on a regular basis in the event that either budgeted
purchase quantities fall below the specified quantities or
market prices for these products fall below the specified prices.
Other
Contingencies
The following table summarizes the Companys contingencies
with respect to external parties, other than those related to
litigation, as of September 30,
2009(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expirations by period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
|
1-2 years
|
|
|
2-3 years
|
|
|
3-4 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
After 5 years
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Maximum potential future payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees(2)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Contingent
government
grants(3)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contingencies
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
(1)
|
Certain expirations of contingencies that are based on the
achievement of milestones or other events that are not
date-certain are included for purposes of this table based on
estimates of the reasonably likely timing of expirations in the
particular case. Actual outcomes could differ from those
estimates.
|
|
(2)
|
Guarantees are mainly issued for the payment of import duties,
rentals of buildings, and contingent obligations related to
government grants received.
|
|
(3)
|
Contingent government grants refer to amounts previously
received, related to the construction and financing of certain
production facilities, which are not otherwise guaranteed and
could be refundable if the total project requirements are not
met.
|
On a group-wide basis the Company has guarantees outstanding to
external parties of 81 million as of
September 30, 2009. In addition, the Company, as parent
company, has in certain customary circumstances guaranteed the
settlement of certain of its consolidated subsidiaries
obligations to third parties. Such third party obligations are
or will be reflected as liabilities in the consolidated
financial statements by virtue of consolidation. As of
September 30, 2009, such guarantees, principally relating
to certain consolidated subsidiaries third-party debt,
aggregated 919 million, of which
644 million relates to convertible notes issued.
The Company has received government grants and subsidies related
to the construction and financing of certain of its production
facilities. These amounts are recognized upon the attainment of
specified criteria. Certain of these grants have been received
contingent upon the Company maintaining compliance with certain
project-related requirements for a specified period after
receipt. The Company is committed to maintaining these
requirements. Nevertheless, should such requirements not be met,
as of September 30, 2009, a maximum of
37 million of these subsidies could be refundable.
Such amount does not include any potential liabilities in
respect of Qimonda-related subsidies (see note 5).
On December 23, 2003, the Company entered into a long-term
operating lease agreement with MoTo Objekt Campeon
GmbH & Co. KG (MoTo) to lease Campeon, an
office complex constructed by MoTo south of Munich, Germany.
MoTo was responsible for the construction, which was completed
in the second half of 2005. The Company has no obligations with
respect to financing MoTo and has provided no guarantees related
to the construction. The Company occupied Campeon under an
operating lease arrangement in October 2005 and completed the
move of its employees to this new location in the 2006 fiscal
year. The complex was leased for a period of 20 years.
After year 15, the Company has a non-bargain purchase option to
acquire the complex or otherwise continue the lease for the
remaining period of five years. Pursuant to the agreement, the
Company placed a rental deposit of 75 million in
escrow, which was included in restricted cash as part of other
financial assets in the balance sheet as of September 30,
2009. Lease payments are subject to limited adjustment based on
specified financial ratios related to the Company. The agreement
was accounted for as an operating lease, in accordance with IAS
17, with monthly lease payments expensed on a straight-line
basis over the lease term.
The Company through certain of its sales and other agreements
may, in the normal course of business, be obligated to indemnify
its counterparties under certain conditions for warranties,
patent infringement or other matters. The maximum amount of
potential future payments under these types of agreements is not
predictable with any degree of certainty, since the potential
obligation is contingent on conditions that may or may not occur
in future, and depends on specific facts and circumstances
related to each agreement. Historically, payments made by the
Company under these types of agreements have not had a material
adverse effect on the Companys business, results of
operations or financial condition. A tabular reconciliation of
the changes in the aggregate product warranty liability for the
year ended September 30, 2009 is presented in note 24.
|
|
39.
|
Operating Segment
and Geographic Information
|
The Company has reported its operating segment and geographic
information in accordance with IFRS 8.
F-79
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Companys core business is organized in four operating
segments: Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, Chip
Card & Security, and Wireless Solutions:
Automotive
The Automotive segment designs, develops, manufactures and
markets semiconductors for use in automotive applications.
Together with its product portfolio, it offers corresponding
system know-how and support to its customers.
Industrial &
Multimarket
The Industrial & Multimarket segment designs,
develops, manufactures and markets semiconductors and complete
system solutions primarily for use in industrial applications
and in applications with customer-specific product requirements.
Chip
Card & Security
The Chip Card & Security segment designs, develops,
manufactures and markets a wide range of security controllers
and security memories for chip card and security applications.
Wireless
Solutions
The Wireless Solutions segment designs, develops, manufactures
and markets a wide range of ICs, other semiconductors and
complete system solutions for wireless communication
applications.
The current segment structure reflects a reorganization of the
Companys operations effective October 1, 2008. To
better align its business with its target markets, the core
business was reorganized into five operating segments:
Automotive, Industrial & Multimarket, Chip
Card & Security, Wireless Solutions, and Wireline
Communications. In July 2009, the Company entered into an asset
purchase agreement to sell its Wireline Communications business,
which closed on November 6, 2009 (see note 5). As a
result of the planned sale, the Management Board determined that
Wireline Communications ceased to be an operating segment in
September 2009. Management reporting was adjusted accordingly.
Segment results for all periods presented have been recast to be
consistent with the current reporting structure and
presentation, as well as to facilitate analysis of operating
segment information.
Other Operating Segments includes net sales and earnings that
the Infineon 200-millimeter production facility in Dresden
recorded from the sale of wafers to Qimonda under a foundry
agreement which was cancelled during the 2008 fiscal year. The
last wafer was delivered to Qimonda in May 2008. The Corporate
and Eliminations segment reflects the elimination of these net
sales and earnings. Furthermore, raw materials and
work-in-process
of the common production front-end facilities, and raw materials
of the common back-end facilities, are not under the control or
responsibility of any of the operating segment managers, but
rather of the operations management. The operations management
is responsible for the execution of the production schedule,
volume and units. Accordingly, this inventory is not attributed
to the operating segments, but is included in the Corporate and
Eliminations segment. Only
work-in-process
of back-end facilities and finished goods are attributed to the
operating segments. The Company records gains and losses from
sales of investments in marketable debt and equity securities in
the Corporate and Eliminations segment.
The Companys Management Board has been collectively
identified as the CODM. The CODM makes decisions about resources
to be allocated to the segments and assesses their performance
using revenues and Segment Result. The Company defines Segment
Result as operating income (loss) excluding asset impairments,
net, restructuring charges and other related closure costs, net,
share-based compensation expense, acquisition-related
amortization and gains (losses), gains (losses) on sales
F-80
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
of assets, businesses, or interests in subsidiaries, and other
income (expense), including litigation settlement costs. The
Companys management uses Segment Result to establish
budgets and operational goals, manage the Companys
business and evaluate its performance. The Company reports
Segment Result because it believes that it provides investors
with meaningful information about the operating performance of
its segments.
The CODM does not review asset information by segment nor does
it evaluate the segments on these criteria on a regular basis,
except that the CODM is provided with information regarding
certain inventories on an operating segment basis. The Company
does, however, allocate depreciation and amortization expense to
the operating segments based on production volume and product
mix using standard costs.
The following tables presents selected segment data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
Wireless
Solutions(1)
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Other
Operating
Segments(2)
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Corporate and
Eliminations(3)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes revenues of 30 million,
10 million and 1 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, from sales of wireless communication applications
to Qimonda.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes revenues of 189 million and
79 million for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, from sales of
wafers from Infineons 200-millimeter facility in Dresden
to Qimonda under a foundry agreement.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes the elimination of revenues of 219 million,
89 million and 1 million for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, since these sales were not part of the Qimonda
disposal plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Segment Result:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table provides the reconciliation of Segment
Result to the Companys loss from continuing operations
before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Total Segment Result
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
Adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairments, net
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, and other related closure cost, net
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Acquisition-related amortization and losses
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on sales of assets, businesses, or interests in
subsidiaries
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Income
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Financial Expense
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
Income from investment accounted for using the equity method, net
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from investments accounted for using the equity method in
the amount of 1 million, 4 million and
7 million was realized in the Industrial &
Multimarket segment during the years ended September 30,
2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. None of the remaining
reportable segments had income from investments accounted for
using the equity method during any of the periods presented.
F-82
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008 and 2009, all inventories were
attributed to the respective operating segment, to the extent
they were under the direct control and responsibility of the
respective operating segment managers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial & Multimarket
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Chip Card & Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Solutions
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Other Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Eliminations
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireline Communications
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with the Companys internal management
reporting, certain items are included in Corporate and
Eliminations and not allocated to the segments. These include
certain corporate headquarters costs, certain incubator and
early stage technology investment costs, non-recurring gains and
specific strategic technology initiatives. Additionally,
restructuring charges and employee stock-based compensation
expense are included in Corporate and Eliminations and not
allocated to the segments for internal or external reporting
purposes, since they arise from corporate directed decisions not
within the direct control of segment management. Furthermore,
legal costs associated with intellectual property and product
matters are recognized by the segments when paid, which can
differ from the period originally recognized by Corporate and
Eliminations. The Company allocates excess capacity costs based
on a foundry model, whereby such allocations are reduced based
upon the lead time of order cancellation or modification. Any
unabsorbed excess capacity costs are included in Corporate and
Eliminations.
F-83
Infineon
Technologies AG and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following is a summary of revenue and of non-current assets
by geographic area for the years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
North America
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
( in millions)
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment; goodwill and other intangible
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
Other Europe
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
North America
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers are based on the
customers billing location. Regional employment data is
provided in note 8.
No single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of
the Companys sales during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008 or 2009.
|
|
40.
|
Events after the
Balance Sheet Date
|
The sale of the Companys Wireline Communications business
to Lantiq closed on November 6, 2009 (see note 5). The
final purchase price amounts to approximately
243 million, reflecting adjustments under the asset
purchase agreement. On the closing date the Company received
cash consideration of 223 million. The final portion
of the purchase price of up to 20 million will become
due in the fourth quarter of the 2010 fiscal year.
F-84
Signatures
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on
Form 20-F
and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this annual report on its behalf.
Infineon Technologies AG
Peter Bauer
Member of the Management Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Dr. Marco Schröter
Member of the Management Board and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: December 7, 2009
Neubiberg, Germany
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
SEC File
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
with SEC
|
|
Number
|
|
1.1
|
|
Articles of Association (as of February 2008) (English
translation)
|
|
20-F
|
|
1.1
|
|
December 29, 2008
|
|
001-15000
|
1.2
|
|
Rules of Procedure for the Management Board (as of November
2007) (English translation)
|
|
20-F
|
|
1.2
|
|
December 29, 2008
|
|
001-15000
|
1.3
|
|
Rules of Procedure for the Supervisory Board (as of November
2009) (English translation)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Rules of Procedure for the Investment Finance and Audit
Committee of the Supervisory Board (as of November 2009)
(English translation)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
The total amount of long-term debt securities of Infineon
Technologies AG authorized under any instrument does not exceed
10% of the total assets of the group on a consolidated basis.
Infineon Technologies AG hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC,
upon its request, a copy of any instrument defining the rights
of holders of long-term debt of Infineon Technologies AG or of
its subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated
financial statements are required to be filed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and Compagnie IBM France, dated as
of June 24, 1999
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
February 18, 2000
|
|
333-11508
|
4.20
|
|
Terms and Conditions of 5% Guaranteed Subordinated Convertible
Notes due 2010 in the aggregate nominal amount of EUR
700,000,000 (the 2010 Notes) issued on June 5,
2003 by Infineon Technologies Holding B.V.
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.30
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.21
|
|
Undertaking for Granting of Conversion Rights from Infineon to
JPMorgan Chase Bank for the benefit of the holders of the 2010
Notes, dated June 2, 2003
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.31
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.22
|
|
Subordinated Guarantee of Infineon, as Guarantor, in favor of
the holders of 2010 Notes, dated June 2, 2003
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.32
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.23
|
|
Loan Agreement dated June 2, 2003, between Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., as Issuer, and Infineon
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.33
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.24
|
|
Assignment Agreement dated June 2, 2003, among Infineon
Technologies Holding B.V., Infineon and JPMorgan Chase Bank for
the benefit of the holders of the 2010 Notes
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.34
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.25()
|
|
Amendment 1, dated June 26, 2003, to Shareholder Agreement
of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon Technologies Holding
France and Compagnie IBM France, dated as of June 24, 1999
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.35
|
|
November 21, 2003
|
|
1-15000
|
4.25.1()
|
|
Amendment 2 effective as of December 31, 2005 to
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and IBM XXI SAS dated as of
June 24, 1999.
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.25.1
|
|
November 30, 2006
|
|
1-15000
|
4.25.2()
|
|
Amendment No. 3, dated as of June 30, 2009, to
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and IBM XXI SAS dated as of
June 24, 1999.
|
|
F-3
|
|
10.3
|
|
July 16, 2009
|
|
333-160601
|
4.25.3()
|
|
Amendment No. 4, dated as of August 26, 2009, to
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and IBM XXI SAS dated as of
June 24, 1999.
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25.4
|
|
Amendment No. 5, dated as of November 30, 2009, to
Shareholder Agreement of ALTIS Semiconductor between Infineon
Technologies Holding France and IBM XXI SAS dated as of
June 24, 1999.
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
SEC File
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
with SEC
|
|
Number
|
|
4.26()
|
|
Real Estate Leasing Contract between MoTo Object CAMPEON
GmbH & Co. KG and Infineon dated as of
December 23, 2003, with Supplementary Agreements No 1 and 2
(English translation)
|
|
20-F
|
|
4.28
|
|
November 26, 2004
|
|
1-15000
|
4.27.1
|
|
Contribution Agreement (Einbringungsvertrag) between
Infineon Technologies AG and Qimonda AG, dated as of April 25,
2006, and addendum thereto, dated as of June 2, 2006 (English
translation).
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(A) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated August 4, 2006 (file
333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.2
|
|
Contribution Agreement (Einbringungsvertrag) between
Infineon Holding B.V. and Qimonda AG, dated as of May 4, 2006
(English translation).
|
|
Filed as exhibit 10(i)(B) to the registration statement on
form F-1
of Qimonda AG dated August 4, 2006 (file
333-135913)
and incorporated herein by reference
|
4.27.3
|
|
Addenda No. 2 and 3 to Contribution Agreement
(Einbringungsvertrag) between Infineon Technologies AG
and Qimonda AG, dated as of April 25, 2006 (English translation).
|
|
Filed as exhibit 4(i)(W) to the annual report on
form 20-F
of Qimonda AG dated November 21, 2006 (file 1-32972) and
incorporated herein by reference
|
4.30
|
|
Terms and Conditions of New Guaranteed
|
|
F-3
|
|
10.4
|
|
July 16, 2009
|
|
333-160601
|
|
|
Subordinated Convertible Notes due 2014 issued on May 26, 2009
by Infineon Technologies Holding B.V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.31()
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2009, by and
between Infineon Technologies AG and Wireline Holdings S.à
r.l.
|
|
F-3
|
|
10.2
|
|
July 16, 2009
|
|
333-160601
|
4.31.1()
|
|
First Amendment Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2009, to
the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2009, by
and between Infineon Technologies AG and Wireline Holdings
S.à r.l.
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.32
|
|
Investment Agreement, dated July 10, 2009, between Infineon
Technologies AG and Admiral Participations (Luxembourg) S.à
r.l.
|
|
F-3
|
|
10.1
|
|
July 16, 2009
|
|
333-160601
|
8
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries and Associated Companies of
Infineon
|
|
See Additional Information Organizational
Structure
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Exchange
Act
Rule 13a-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confidential treatment requested as
to certain portions, which portions have been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|