e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-1969
ARBITRON INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
52-0278528
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
142 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019-3000
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 887-1300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o |
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The registrant had 26,384,835 shares of common stock, par value $0.50 per share, outstanding
as of October 31, 2008.
ARBITRON INC.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Arbitron owns or has the rights to various trademarks, trade names or service marks used in
its radio audience measurement business and subsidiaries, including the following: the Arbitron
name and logo, ArbitrendsSM, RetailDirect®, RADAR®,
TapscanTM, Tapscan WorldWideTM,
LocalMotion®, Maximi$er®, Maximi$er® Plus, Arbitron PD
Advantage®, SmartPlus®, Arbitron Portable People MeterTM,
Marketing Resources Plus®, MRPSM, PrintPlus®, MapMAKER
DirectSM, Media ProfessionalSM, Media Professional PlusSM,
QualitapSM, MediaMasterSM,
ProspectorSM, and Schedule-ItSM.
The trademarks Windows® and Media Rating Council® are the registered
trademarks of others.
3
PART 1.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
8,491 |
|
|
$ |
21,141 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,987 in 2008 and $1,688 in 2007 |
|
|
34,658 |
|
|
|
34,171 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
7,262 |
|
|
|
4,505 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,677 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
52,667 |
|
|
|
68,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliate(s) |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
15,262 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
57,981 |
|
|
|
50,183 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
38,500 |
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
162,413 |
|
|
$ |
180,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders (Deficit) Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
8,950 |
|
|
$ |
10,338 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
27,069 |
|
|
|
27,702 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,651 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
55,878 |
|
|
|
66,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
91,897 |
|
|
|
114,459 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
10,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
171,745 |
|
|
|
132,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $100.00 par value, 750 shares authorized, no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.50 par value, authorized 500,000 shares,
issued 32,338 shares as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007 |
|
|
16,169 |
|
|
|
16,169 |
|
Net distributions to parent prior to the March 30, 2001, spin-off |
|
|
(239,042 |
) |
|
|
(239,042 |
) |
Retained earnings subsequent to spin-off |
|
|
223,591 |
|
|
|
279,996 |
|
Common stock held in treasury , 5,968 shares in 2008
and 4,028 shares in 2007 |
|
|
(2,984 |
) |
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(7,066 |
) |
|
|
(6,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
|
(9,332 |
) |
|
|
48,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
$ |
162,413 |
|
|
$ |
180,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
102,526 |
|
|
$ |
93,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
41,795 |
|
|
|
34,451 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
20,058 |
|
|
|
18,965 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
9,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
72,127 |
|
|
|
63,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
30,399 |
|
|
|
30,319 |
|
Equity in net loss of affiliate(s) |
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before interest and income tax expense |
|
|
28,205 |
|
|
|
27,056 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense |
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
|
27,515 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
10,788 |
|
|
|
10,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
16,900 |
|
|
|
17,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,955 |
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per weighted-average common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares used in calculations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
26,652 |
|
|
|
29,602 |
|
Potentially dilutive securities |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
26,900 |
|
|
|
29,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share outstanding |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Certain per share data amounts may not total due to rounding.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
275,246 |
|
|
$ |
258,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
129,490 |
|
|
|
107,918 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
58,587 |
|
|
|
59,343 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
29,802 |
|
|
|
32,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
217,879 |
|
|
|
199,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
57,367 |
|
|
|
59,053 |
|
Equity in net loss of affiliates |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before interest and income tax expense |
|
|
56,394 |
|
|
|
57,123 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense |
|
|
55,452 |
|
|
|
58,580 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
21,615 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
33,837 |
|
|
|
36,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,822 |
|
|
$ |
36,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per weighted-average common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares used in calculations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
27,339 |
|
|
|
29,768 |
|
Potentially dilutive securities |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
27,546 |
|
|
|
30,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share outstanding |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Certain per share data amounts may not total due to rounding.
6
ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands and unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,822 |
|
|
$ |
36,503 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
33,837 |
|
|
|
36,369 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
8,063 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
Loss on asset disposals |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Equity in net loss of affiliates |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
Distributions from affiliate |
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Non-cash share-based compensation |
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
5,046 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
361 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(2,233 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
(4,004 |
) |
|
|
(9,257 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(10,890 |
) |
|
|
(7,866 |
) |
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,170 |
) |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
44,438 |
|
|
|
40,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(22,734 |
) |
|
|
(15,261 |
) |
Payments related to business acquisitions |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliate |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
(2,136 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170,545 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,020 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(22,194 |
) |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises and stock purchase plan |
|
|
9,815 |
|
|
|
14,476 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
(96,266 |
) |
|
|
(64,998 |
) |
Tax benefits realized from share-based awards |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
(8,367 |
) |
|
|
(8,995 |
) |
Borrowings of long-term debt |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(67,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(35,863 |
) |
|
|
(57,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,637 |
) |
|
|
(14,942 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
22,128 |
|
|
|
33,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
8,491 |
|
|
$ |
18,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations at end of period |
|
$ |
8,491 |
|
|
$ |
16,044 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
8,491 |
|
|
$ |
18,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
ARBITRON INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2008
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Arbitron Inc. (the
Company or Arbitron) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included and
are of a normal recurring nature. Certain amounts in the financial statements for prior periods
have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation. The consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2007, was audited at that date, but all of the information and footnotes
as of December 31, 2007, required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have not been
included in this Form 10-Q. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of the Company for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, reflect the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company and its subsidiaries: Arbitron Holdings Inc., Audience Research Bureau S.A. de C.V.,
Ceridian Infotech (India) Private Limited, CSW Research Limited, Euro Fieldwork Limited, Arbitron
International, LLC, and Arbitron Technology Services India Private Limited. All significant
intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company consummated the sale of
CSW Research Limited and Euro Fieldwork Limited, a subsidiary of CSW Research Limited, on January
31, 2008. The financial information of CSW Research Limited and Euro Fieldwork Limited has been
separately reclassified within the consolidated financial statements as a discontinued operation.
See Note 3 for further information.
8
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which
defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
regarding fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements
but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for all financial assets and liabilities and the impact to the
consolidated financial statements was immaterial. In accordance with FASB Staff Position 157-2, the
provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for
all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The management of the Company is evaluating
the impact of adopting the nonfinancial asset and nonfinancial liability provisions of SFAS No.
157, but does not currently expect such adoption, effective January 1, 2009, to have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Effective December 31, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158). The Company currently
measures plan assets and benefit obligations as of September 30 of each year. In accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 158, the measurement date will be required to be as of the date of the
Companys fiscal year-end statement of financial position effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. The management of the Company has evaluated the potential impact of adopting the
measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 on the Companys consolidated financial statements and
expects that such impact will not be material to the financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows of the Company.
9
3. Discontinued Operation
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company approved a plan to sell CSW Research Limited
(Continental), which represented a component of the Companys international operations. As a
result, the assets and liabilities, results of operations, and cash flow activity of Continental
were reclassified separately as a discontinued operation held for sale within the consolidated
financial statements for all periods presented. On January 31, 2008, the sale of Continental was
completed at a gain of $0.4 million. The following tables present key information associated with
the net assets and operating results of the discontinued operations for the reporting periods
included in the consolidated financial statements filed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
987 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,112 |
|
Deferred taxes-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
Deferred taxes-noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Results of Discontinued Operations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
|
$ |
9,002 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
8,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
188 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
(Loss) gain on sale, net of taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
On December 20, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with a consortium of lenders to
provide up to $150.0 million of financing to the Company through a five-year, unsecured revolving
credit facility (the Credit Facility). The agreement contains an expansion feature for us to
increase the total financing available under the Credit Facility up to $200.0 million with such
increased financing to be provided by one or more existing Credit Facility lending institutions,
subject to the approval of the lending banks, and/or in combination with one or more new lending
institutions, subject to the approval of the Credit Facilitys administrative agent. As of
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility
were $70.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively. There was no short-term portion of long-term
debt recorded as of September 30, 2008. The $12.0 million of debt recorded as of December 31, 2007,
included $5.0 million in short-term obligations under the provisions of the Credit Facility.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain certain leverage
and coverage ratios and meet other financial conditions. The agreement contains certain financial
covenants, and limits among other things, the Companys ability to sell certain assets, incur
additional indebtedness, and grant or incur liens on its assets. Under the terms of the Credit
Facility, all of the Companys material domestic subsidiaries, if any, guarantee the commitment. As
of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the Company had no material domestic subsidiaries as
defined by the terms of the Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the
Company was in compliance with the terms of the Credit Facility.
If a default occurs on outstanding borrowings, either because the Company is unable to
generate sufficient cash flow to service the debt or because the Company fails to comply with one
or more of the restrictive covenants, the lenders could elect to declare all of the then
outstanding borrowings, as well as accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable.
In addition, a default may result in the application of higher rates of interest on the amounts
due.
The Credit Facility has two borrowing options, a Eurodollar rate option or an alternate base
rate option, as defined in the agreement. Under the Eurodollar option, the Company may elect
interest periods of one, two, three or six months at the inception date and each renewal date.
Borrowings under the Eurodollar option bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
plus a margin of 0.575% to 1.25%. Borrowings under the base rate option bear interest at the
higher of the lead lenders prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points, plus a
margin of 0.00% to 0.25%. The specific margins, under both options, are determined based on the
Companys ratio of indebtedness to earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation,
amortization and non-cash share-based compensation (the leverage ratio), and is adjusted every 90
days. The agreement contains a facility fee provision whereby the Company is charged a fee,
ranging from 0.175% to 0.25%, applied to the total amount of the commitment. The interest rate on
outstanding borrowings as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, was 3.3% and 5.8%,
respectively.
Interest paid during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, was $1.6
million and $0.2 million, respectively. Interest capitalized during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2008, was $0.1 million. No interest was capitalized during the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2007, due to no outstanding borrowings being incurred during that period in
2007. Non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs classified as interest expense during each
of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, was $0.1 million, respectively.
Non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs classified as interest expense during each of the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, was less than $0.1 million, respectively.
11
5. Stockholders (Deficit) Equity
Changes in stockholders (deficit) equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, were
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Parent |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
March 30, 2001 |
|
|
Subsequent |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders' |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Spin-off |
|
|
to Spin-off |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
(Deficit) Equity |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
28,310 |
|
|
$ |
16,169 |
|
|
$ |
(2,014 |
) |
|
$ |
(239,042 |
) |
|
$ |
279,996 |
|
|
$ |
(6,909 |
) |
|
$ |
48,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued from |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,640 |
|
treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock repurchased |
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,192 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
26,370 |
|
|
$ |
16,169 |
|
|
$ |
(2,984 |
) |
|
$ |
(239,042 |
) |
|
$ |
223,591 |
|
|
$ |
(7,066 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per common share was paid to stockholders on
October 1, 2008. Of the $100.0 million of the Companys outstanding stock repurchased for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, $3.7 million was paid for in cash during the month of October
2008.
12
6. Short-Term Investments
The Company has historically made short-term investments in municipal and other
government-issued variable-rate demand notes. Such investments, if any, are recorded by the Company
at fair value and any outstanding investment assets are classified as available-for-sale securities
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
As of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, there were no outstanding short-term investment
assets recorded on the Companys balance sheet.
There were no purchases or sales of available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, purchases
of available-for-sale securities were $30.3 million and $170.5 million, respectively. For the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, proceeds from the sales of
available-for-sale securities were $61.1 million and $190.0 million, respectively.
7. Net Income Per Weighted-Average Common Share
The computations of basic and diluted net income per weighted-average common share for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, are based on the Companys
weighted-average shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities outstanding.
Potentially dilutive securities are calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method,
which assumes that the proceeds from the exercise of all stock options are used to repurchase the
Companys common stock at the average market price for the period. As of September 30, 2008, and
2007, there were options to purchase 1,730,683 and 1,863,273 shares of the Companys common stock
outstanding, of which options to purchase 430,713 and 182,791 shares of the Companys common stock,
respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per weighted-average common
share for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, respectively, either because the options
exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Companys common shares or
assumed repurchases from proceeds from the options exercise were potentially antidilutive. The
Company elected to use the alternative method prescribed by FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 123R-3,
Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards, for
determining its initial hypothetical tax benefit pool. In addition, in accordance with provisions
under SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123R) the assumed proceeds associated with
the entire amount of tax benefits for share-based awards granted prior to SFAS No. 123R adoption
were used in the diluted shares computation. For share-based awards granted subsequent to the
January 1, 2006, SFAS No. 123R adoption date, the assumed proceeds for the related excess tax
benefits were used in the diluted shares computation.
13
8. Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The Companys comprehensive income is comprised of net income, changes in foreign currency
translation adjustments, and changes in retirement liabilities, net of tax (expense) benefits. The
components of comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,955 |
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
$ |
33,822 |
|
|
$ |
36,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax benefit
(expense) of $139 and $(17) for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, and 2007, respectively; and a tax benefit
(expense) of $381 and $(60) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in retirement liabilities, net
of tax benefit (expense) of $(93) and $(87)
for the three months ended September 30,
2008, and 2007, respectively; and a tax benefit (expense)
of $(280) and $(258) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
16,885 |
|
|
$ |
17,387 |
|
|
$ |
33,665 |
|
|
$ |
37,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes |
|
$ |
(214 |
) |
|
$ |
374 |
|
Retirement liabilities, net of taxes |
|
|
(6,852 |
) |
|
|
(7,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(7,066 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
9. Investment in Affiliates
Investment in affiliates consists of the Companys 49.5% interest in Scarborough, a
syndicated, qualitative local market research partnership, and until its termination on June 30,
2008, the Companys 50.0% interest in Project Apollo LLC, a pilot national marketing research
service. Both investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The following
table shows the investment activity for each of the Companys affiliates and in total for the
periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Investment Activity in Affiliates (in thousands) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scarborough |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Scarborough |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
12,794 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,794 |
|
|
$ |
12,542 |
|
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
13,908 |
|
Equity in net loss of affiliates |
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
Distributions from affiliate |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
Cash investments in affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
8,902 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
10,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apollo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scarborough |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Scarborough |
|
|
LLC |
|
|
Total |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
14,420 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
|
$ |
13,907 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,907 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
(1,903 |
) |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
(3,025 |
) |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
Distributions from affiliate |
|
|
(6,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,850 |
) |
|
|
(6,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,100 |
) |
Non-cash investments in affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
Cash investments in affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
8,902 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
10,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
10. Retirement Plans
Certain of the Companys United States employees participate in a defined-benefit pension plan
that closed to new participants effective January 1, 1995. The Company subsidizes healthcare
benefits for eligible retired employees who participate in the pension plan and were hired before
January 1, 1992. The Company also sponsors two nonqualified, unfunded supplemental retirement
plans.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, (SFAS No. 158). During 2007 and prior years, the Company
measured plan assets and benefit obligations as of September 30. In accordance with the provisions
of SFAS No. 158, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, the measurement date is
required to be as of the date of the Companys fiscal year-end statement of financial position,
December 31. The management of the Company has evaluated the potential impact of adopting the
measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158 on the Companys consolidated financial statements and
expects that such impact will not be material to the financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows of the Company.
The components of periodic benefit costs for the defined-benefit pension, postretirement, and
supplemental retirement plans were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined-Benefit |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Supplemental |
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Expected return on plan
assets |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior
service cost |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined-Benefit |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Supplemental |
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Expected return on plan
assets |
|
|
(1,826 |
) |
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior
service cost |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company contributed $1.4 million to
the defined benefit pension plan. The Company estimates that $0.2 million will be contributed to
the other benefit plans during 2008.
16
11. Taxes
The effective tax rate from continuing operations increased to 39.0% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, from 37.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, to reflect the
increase in certain non-deductible expenses and the increase in certain state income tax rates.
The Companys net unrecognized tax benefit for certain tax contingencies was $1.0 million as
of both September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. If recognized, the $1.0 million of unrecognized
tax benefits would reduce the Companys effective tax rate in future periods.
The Company accrues potential interest and penalties and recognizes income tax expense where,
under relevant tax law, interest and penalties would be assessed if the uncertain tax position
ultimately was not sustained. The Company has recorded a liability for potential interest and
penalties of $0.1 million as of September 30, 2008.
Management determined it is reasonably possible that certain unrecognized tax benefits as of
September 30, 2008, will decrease during the subsequent twelve months due to either the expiration
of statutes of limitation or due to the settlement of certain state audit examinations. The
estimated decrease in these unrecognized federal tax benefits and the estimated decrease in
unrecognized tax benefits from various states are both immaterial.
The Company files numerous income tax returns, primarily in the United States, including
federal, state, and local jurisdictions, and certain foreign jurisdictions. Tax years ended
December 31, 2005, through December 31, 2007, remain open for assessment by the Internal Revenue
Service. Generally, the Company is not subject to state, local or foreign examination for years
prior to 2004. However, tax years 1989 through 2003 remain open for assessment for certain state
taxing jurisdictions where net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards were utilized on income tax
returns for such states since 2003.
As the Company is subject to federal and state audits throughout the normal course of
operations, losses for tax contingencies are recognized for unasserted contingent claims when such
matters are probable and reasonably estimable.
Income taxes paid on continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and
2007, were $15.8 million and $15.3 million, respectively.
17
12. Share-Based Compensation
The following table sets forth information with regard to the income statement recognition of
share-based compensation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,751 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
4,205 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
$ |
2,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,573 |
|
|
$ |
6,399 |
|
|
$ |
5,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no capitalized share-based compensation cost recorded during the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2008, and 2007.
On May 13, 2008, the Companys shareholders approved the 2008 Equity Compensation Plan that
provides for the grant of share-based awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, and restricted stock units. The maximum amount of authorized share awards to be
issued under this plan is 2,500,000 shares of the Companys common stock and of this amount, a
maximum of 625,000 shares of the Companys common stock are authorized to be issued for awards
other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. The expiration date of the 2008 Equity
Compensation Plan is May 13, 2018. The Companys policy for issuing shares upon option exercise or
conversion of its nonvested share awards and deferred stock units under all of the Companys stock
incentive plans is to issue new shares of common stock, unless treasury stock is available at the
time of exercise or conversion.
Stock Options
Stock options awarded to employees under the 1999 and 2001 Stock Incentive Plans and the 2008
Equity Compensation Plan (referred to herein collectively as the SIPs) generally vest annually
over a three-year period, have five-year or 10-year terms and have an exercise price of not less
than the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. Stock options granted to
directors under the SIPs generally vest upon the date of grant, are generally exercisable in six
months after the date of grant, have 10-year terms and have an exercise price not less than the
fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The Companys options provide for
accelerated vesting if there is a change in control of the Company.
The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations in
order to determine the expected term of the option; identified groups of optionholders that have
similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected
term of options granted represents the period of time that such options are expected to be
outstanding. The expected term can vary for certain groups of optionholders exhibiting different
behavior. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the
U.S. Treasury strip bond yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatilities are
based primarily on the historical volatility of the Companys common stock.
18
The fair value of each option granted to employees and nonemployee directors during the
periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, was estimated on the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option valuation model. Those assumptions along with other data regarding the
Companys stock options are noted in the following table (dollars in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions for Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted to Employees and |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
Nonemployee Directors |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Expected volatility |
|
23.99 - 24.70% |
|
24.61 - 25.71.% |
|
23.99 - 25.27% |
|
24.95 - 26.52% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividends |
|
1.00% |
|
1.00% |
|
1.00% |
|
1.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years) |
|
5.50 - 6.00 |
|
5.75 - 6.25 |
|
5.50 - 6.00 |
|
5.75 - 6.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free rate |
|
3.08 - 3.32% |
|
4.31 - 4.61% |
|
2.60 - 3.44% |
|
4.31 - 4.91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average volatility |
|
24.53% |
|
25.51% |
|
25.19% |
|
25.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average term (in
years) |
|
5.89 |
|
6.16 |
|
5.94 |
|
5.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average risk-free
rate |
|
3.18% |
|
4.46% |
|
2.92% |
|
4.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant
date fair value per share |
|
$12.65 |
|
$15.64 |
|
$11.50 |
|
$14.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
6,836 |
|
18,831 |
|
319,341 |
|
177,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise
price for options granted
per share |
|
$47.25 |
|
$50.34 |
|
$42.81 |
|
$48.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of options
exercised |
|
$1,123 |
|
$1,386 |
|
$3,506 |
|
$5,508 |
As of September 30, 2008, there was $4.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to options granted under the SIPs. This aggregate unrecognized cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years. The weighted-average exercise price and
weighted-average remaining contractual term for outstanding stock options as of September 30, 2008,
were $39.88 and 6.80 years, respectively, and as of September 30, 2007, $38.35 and 6.51 years,
respectively.
19
Nonvested Share Awards
The Companys nonvested share awards generally vest over four or five years on either a
monthly or annual basis. The Companys awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change
in control of the Company. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis using the
market price on the date of grant as the awards vest. As of September 30, 2008, there was $8.1
million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share awards granted under the
SIPs. This aggregate unrecognized cost for nonvested share awards is expected to be recognized over
a weighted-average period of 2.1 years. Other nonvested share award information for the periods
ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, is noted in the following table (dollars in thousands, except
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Number of shares
granted |
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,356 |
|
|
|
113,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
grant-date fair
value per share |
|
$ |
47.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43.99 |
|
|
$ |
46.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of
shares vested |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
Deferred Stock Units
Deferred stock units granted to one of the Companys employees vest annually on a calendar
year basis through December 31, 2009, and are convertible into shares of common stock, subsequent
to employment termination. Deferred stock units granted to nonemployee directors vest immediately
upon grant and are convertible into shares of common stock subsequent to the directors termination
of service. As of September 30, 2008, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to deferred
stock units granted under the SIPs was $1.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.3 years. Other deferred stock unit information for the periods ended
September 30, 2008, and 2007, is noted in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Shares granted to
employee directors |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,753 |
|
|
|
21,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted to
nonemployee
directors |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of
shares vested |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
20
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On May 13, 2008, the Companys shareholders approved an amendment to its compensatory Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) increasing the maximum number of shares of Company common stock
reserved for sale under the ESPP from 600,000 to 850,000. The purchase price of the stock to ESPP
participants is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value on either the first day or the last day
of the applicable three-month offering period. Other deferred stock unit information for the
periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, is noted in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Share-based
compensation
expense |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of ESPP
shares issued |
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
26,733 |
|
|
|
26,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of proceeds
received from
employees |
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
21
13. Concentration of Credit Risk
The Companys quantitative radio audience measurement business and related software licensing
accounted for the following percentages of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative
Radio Business |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
Related
Software Licensing |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
The Company had one customer that individually represented 19% of its annual revenue for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Although the industry consolidation has led to a concentration of the
Companys customer base, the Company has historically experienced a high level of contract
renewals.
14. Financial Instruments
Fair values of short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate carrying values due to their short-term nature. Due to the floating rate nature of the
Companys Credit Facility, the fair values of the $70.0 million and $12.0 million in related
outstanding borrowings as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, also
approximate their carrying amounts. There was no short-term portion of the
long-term debt recorded as of September 30, 2008. The $12.0 million of debt recorded as of December
31, 2007, included $5.0 million in short-term obligations under the Credit Facility.
15. Stock Repurchases
On November 14, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up
to $200.0 million of the Companys outstanding common stock through either periodic open-market or
private transactions at then-prevailing market prices over a period of up to two years through
November 14, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 2,247,400
shares of outstanding common stock under this program for $100.0 million.
On November 16, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a program to
repurchase up to $100.0 million of its outstanding common stock through either periodic open-market
or private transactions at then-prevailing market prices over a period of up to two years through
November 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company repurchased 1,502,200
shares under this program for $72.9 million. As of October 19, 2007, the program was completed with
2,093,500 shares being repurchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $100.0 million.
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements regarding Arbitron Inc. and
its subsidiaries (we, our, Arbitron or the Company) in this document that are not
historical in nature, particularly those that utilize terminology such as may, will, should,
likely, expects, intends, anticipates, estimates, believes, or plans or comparable
terminology, are forward-looking statements based on current expectations about future events,
which we have derived from information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to be materially
different from results implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include, in no particular order, whether we will be able to:
|
|
|
absorb costs related to legal proceedings and governmental entity interactions and avoid
related fines, limitations, or conditions on our business activities; |
|
|
|
|
successfully implement the commercialization of our Portable People MeterTM
(PPM) service; |
|
|
|
|
successfully maintain industry usage of our services, a critical mass of broadcaster
encoding, and the proper understanding of our audience measurement services and methodology
in light of governmental regulation, legislation, litigation, activism or adverse public
relations efforts; |
|
|
|
|
successfully design, recruit and maintain PPM panels that appropriately balance research
quality, panel size and operational cost; |
|
|
|
|
complete the Media Rating Council (MRC) audits of our local market PPM ratings
services in a timely manner and successfully obtain and/or maintain MRC accreditation for
our audience measurement business; |
|
|
|
|
renew contracts with key customers as they expire; |
|
|
|
|
successfully execute our business strategies, including entering into potential
acquisition, joint-venture or other material third-party agreements; |
|
|
|
|
effectively manage the impact, if any, of any further ownership shifts in the radio and
advertising agency industries; |
|
|
|
effectively respond to rapidly changing technological needs of our customer base,
including creating new proprietary software systems and new customer services that meet
these needs in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
successfully manage the impact on our business of any economic downturn, generally, and
in the advertising and radio industries, in particular; |
|
|
|
|
successfully manage the trend of increasing data collection costs stemming from lower
respondent cooperation in surveys, privacy concerns, consumer trends, including the
increasing incidence of cell-phone-only households, evolving technology and/or government
regulation; and |
|
|
|
|
successfully develop and implement technology solutions to measure new forms of
audio-based content and delivery, multimedia and advertising in an increasingly competitive
environment. |
There are a number of additional important factors that could cause actual events or our
actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, the risk factors set forth in the caption ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, the caption Item 1A. Risk
Factors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, and elsewhere, and any subsequent periodic or current reports filed
by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
23
In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our estimates only as of the date
hereof, and should not be relied upon as representing our estimates as of any subsequent date.
While we may elect to update any forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we
specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our estimates change.
Overview
We are a leading media and marketing information services firm primarily serving radio, cable
television, advertising agencies, advertisers, retailers, out-of-home media, online media and,
through our Scarborough Research joint venture with The Nielsen Company (Nielsen), broadcast
television and print media. We currently provide four main services to our customers:
|
|
|
measuring radio audiences in local markets in the United States; |
|
|
|
|
measuring national radio audiences and the size and composition of audiences of
network radio programs and commercials; |
|
|
|
|
providing software used for accessing and analyzing our media audience and marketing
information data; and |
|
|
|
|
providing consumer, shopping, and media-usage information services. |
In addition, we license our PPM technology to a number of international media information
services companies for use in the measurement of both radio and television audiences.
Historically, our quantitative radio audience measurement business and related software have
accounted for a substantial majority of our revenue. Our quantitative radio audience measurement
business accounted for 77 and 76 percent of our revenue for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2008, and 2007, respectively. Our related software licensing accounted for nine percent of our
revenue for the same periods in both 2008, and 2007. We expect that for the year ended December
31, 2008, our quantitative radio audience measurement business and related software licensing will
account for approximately 78 percent and nine percent, respectively, of our revenue, which is
consistent with historic annual trends. Quarterly fluctuations in these percentages are reflective
of the seasonal delivery schedule of our quantitative radio audience measurement business and our
Scarborough revenues. For further information regarding seasonality trends, see Seasonality.
While we expect that our quantitative radio audience measurement business and related software
licensing will continue to account for the majority of our revenue for the foreseeable future, we
are actively seeking opportunities to diversify our revenue base by, among other things, leveraging
the investment we have made in our PPM technology and by exploring applications of the technology
beyond our domestic radio audience measurement business.
In 2007 and 2006, we entered into multiyear agreements with many of our largest customers,
including agreements for PPM-based ratings as and when we commercialize our PPM service in the PPM Markets, as defined in PPM Rating Service Trends and Initiatives below. These broadcasters account for approximately 89 percent of the radio
advertising revenue in these markets. The agreements for these customers generally provide for
a higher license fee for PPM-based ratings than what we charge for diary-based ratings. As a
result, we expect that the percentage of our revenues derived from our quantitative radio audience
measurement business and related software licensing is likely to increase as we commercialize our
PPM service.
Concentration of ownership of radio stations has led to our increased dependence on a limited
number of key customers. In 2007, Clear Channel Communications Inc. represented 19 percent of our
total annual revenue. Because many of our largest customers own and operate radio stations in
markets that we expect to transition to PPM measurement, we expect that our dependence on our
largest customers will continue for the foreseeable future.
24
Response rates are an important measure of our effectiveness in obtaining consent from persons
to participate in our surveys. We seek to achieve response rates that are sufficient to maintain
usage of our ratings. Another measure often used by clients to assess quality in our ratings is
sample proportionality, which refers to how well the distribution of the sample for any individual
survey matches the distribution of the population in the local market. Initiatives designed to
address response rates and sample proportionality can increase the costs associated with our data
collection.
Diary Trends and Initiatives
Beginning with the Spring 2008 diary survey, we expanded promised incentives to smaller
markets where the Male 18-34 proportionality is less than certain thresholds, and we began offering
a second chance to participate in our surveys to households in which respondents initially agreed to participate, but failed to
return any diaries for the week selected. In the first quarter of 2008, we upgraded our diary
processing capabilities with a new state-of-the-art facility that combines several business processes under one
roof. We designed the new building, layout and equipment to increase productivity, efficiency and
accuracy for diary processing, which will allow us to implement future planned diary sample
improvement initiatives more quickly.
In September 2008, we announced an expansion of our sample quality improvement programs for
diary markets. The new efforts to further enhance the participation of 18-34 year olds in our
samples include increasing cash and other incentives for persons age 18-34 while reducing
incentives for age 55+ only households in all diary markets starting with the Spring 2009 survey,
and accelerating our work to design web-based data collection and to test whether they could replace
the paper and pencil diary as the primary means to collect data in diary markets.
In October 2008, we announced plans to accelerate the introduction of
cell-phone-only sampling in diary markets by six months. Beginning with the Spring 2009 survey, we
intend to add cell-phone-only households to the sample in 50 diary markets and beginning with the Fall
2009 survey, to the sample of 125 diary markets. In addition, we announced that the same metric
used to gauge our PPM sample quality performanceDesignated Delivery Indexwill be used to
measure diary sample performance. Designated Delivery Index (DDI) is defined as the actual sample
size achieved for a given demographic indexed against the target sample size for that demographic.
Starting with the Fall 2008 survey, we plan to establish a sample benchmark for persons aged 18-54
in all diary markets equal to a DDI of 80. Should the actual sample performance fall below this
threshold in a given markets survey, we will attempt to bring the sample performance above that
threshold in subsequent surveys.
Some radio broadcasters in markets ranked 100+ have expressed a desire for alternatives to our
current diary-based ratings services. We intend to continue to offer an array of options to
customers in individual markets ranked 100+ that can provide them with the data they need to
appropriately position their stations to maximize their revenue opportunities. On April 14, 2008,
Cumulus Media Inc. (Cumulus) announced a request for proposals (RFP) for the development of a new radio audience
measurement service designed to measure both quantitative and qualitative audience characteristics in markets ranked 100+.
We have submitted a proposal for consideration as part of the RFP process. There can be
no guarantee that Cumulus will select our proposal.
PPM Rating Service Trends and Initiatives
We have begun execution of our previously announced plan to commercialize progressively our
PPM ratings service in the largest U.S. radio markets, which we currently anticipate will result in commercialization of the service in 49 markets by December 2010 (the PPM Markets). We anticipate that we may continue to update the timing of commercialization and the composition of the PPM Markets from time to time. In November 2007, we
announced our decision to delay the commercialization of the PPM ratings service in certain local
markets in order to address feedback regarding the PPM service we had received from our customers,
the Media Rating Council (MRC), and certain other constituencies. We believe that during the
course of the delay, we enhanced our PPM samples in several areas. On October 6, 2008, we
commercialized the PPM radio ratings service with the release of the September 2008 PPM report
(August 21 to September 17) in eight markets, including New York, Nassau-Suffolk, Middlesex-
Somerset-Union, Los Angeles, Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San Francisco, and San Jose.
The Spring 2008 survey was the last diary report for these markets.
25
On November 4, 2008, we announced an adjustment to our PPM commercialization schedule. Four
markets Kansas City, San Antonio, Salt Lake City and Las Vegas are now scheduled to
commercialize with the December 2009 PPM survey report (November 12 to December 9), currently
slated for release on December 31, 2009. Previously, these four markets were slated to
commercialize with the release of the March 2010 PPM survey report. The final diary-based audience
survey in these four markets will be the Summer 2009 survey (June 25 September 16). Five markets
Milwaukee, Charlotte, Columbus, Providence and Orlando are now scheduled to commercialize
with the release of the Septemer 2010 PPM survey report in October. Previously, these five markets
were scheduled to commercialize with the release of the June 2010 PPM survey report. The final
diary-based audience report in these four markets will now be for the Spring 2010 survey (April 1
June 23). We are rebalancing our PPM commercialization schedule in order to create financial and operational efficiencies.
Recently, costs and expenses related to litigation and other interactions with governmental
entities, primarily regarding our PPM radio ratings service, have been substantial. We currently
estimate that based on the current expense rates, the related 2008 legal and governmental expenses
could be in the range of $4.0 million to $6.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2008, which is
significantly greater than historical trends. Our actual legal and governmental costs and expenses
could be above or below that estimated range. See Part IIOther Information Item 1. Legal
Proceedings contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information.
As previously announced, we intend to comply with the MRCs draft voluntary code of conduct
(VCOC) before commercializing our PPM service in each local market and we also intend to pursue
MRC accreditation of the PPM service in each local market. The VCOC requires that, at a minimum,
ratings companies seeking to replace an accredited currency measurement service with a new currency
measurement service, complete an independent audit of the service, share the findings of the audit
with MRC members, and provide a period of pre-currency data so that customers can assess the data from
the new service prior to commercialization.
During the first quarter of 2008, the MRC decided to deny accreditation of the Philadelphia
and New York local market PPM services based on audits completed in both markets in 2007, the
review of the audit findings and additional information provided to the MRC PPM audit subcommittee.
As part of the accreditation process, we agreed to new audits of the Philadelphia and New York
local market PPM services. These audits were completed in the first half of 2008, and the audit
report was presented to the MRC audit committee. The audit of the PPM services for the Los Angeles,
Chicago, Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San Francisco, and San Jose markets has also been
completed. The MRC accreditation status in both Philadelphia and New York is unchanged at this
time; the denial status remains in effect as the accreditation process continues.
Due to a challenging radio industry environment, as well as the high penetration of our
current services into the radio industry, our annual organic rate of revenue growth from our
quantitative radio measurement business and related software licensing has been slower than
historical trends. However, with the commercialization of our PPM service in the third quarter of
2008 in eight local markets, including New York, Nassau-Suffolk, Middlesex-Somerset-Union, Los
Angeles, Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San Francisco, and San Jose, our third quarter 2008
revenue growth exceeded the level of contractual price escalators in our diary-based radio ratings
contracts. Despite this growth in revenue, we anticipate that we will continue to incur additional
costs related to initiatives designed to improve our PPM service. We expect that our results of
operations for the fourth quarter will be adversely impacted by the incremental costs incurred in
building and continuously improving our PPM ratings service panels while also operating the
diary-based ratings service in the local markets scheduled for commercialization in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
As we have anticipated, our efforts to support the commercialization of our PPM ratings
service have had a material negative impact on our results of operations. Restoration of our
operating margins following completion of the PPM transition process in the PPM Markets remains our goal, although there can be no assurance that such restoration will take place.
We continue to operate in a highly challenging business environment in the markets and
industries we serve. Our future performance will be impacted by our ability to address a variety
of challenges and opportunities in these markets and industries, including our ability to continue
to maintain and improve both our diary service and our PPM service, and manage increased costs for data collection, arising among other ways,
from increased numbers of cell-phone-only households, which historically have been more expensive
to recruit than households with landline phones. We will also seek to pursue MRC accreditation in
all of our PPM markets, and develop and implement effective and efficient technological solutions
to measure multimedia and advertising.
26
In December 2007, we announced a sample size guarantee that would provide a partial rebate
to our customers for PPM radio ratings in any local market for a measurement period in which our
delivered average daily in-tab among persons aged 18-54 falls below 80 percent of our published
average daily in-tab target for that market. In July 2008, we announced that the sample size
guarantee will now be applicable beginning with the first month of PPM currency in each local
market and that, beginning on the first anniversary of PPM currency in each local market, the
threshold for application of the sample size guarantee will increase to 90 percent of our published
18-54 average daily in-tab target for that local market, based on a 13-report rolling average.
In July 2008, we also announced a new PPM sample size program designed to deliver a larger
sample target for persons aged 12 and over. We plan to implement the increase in the persons aged
12 and over sample target in phases, beginning in 2009.
Impact of Hurricane Ike
We are in the process of assessing the losses incurred from storm damage and business
interruption in Houston and the surrounding areas within the Hurricane Ike impact zone. So far, as
a result of the dislocation of sample respondents during the hurricane, Houston-Galveston PPM data
will only be issued for three of the four weeks in the September 2008 survey and two of the four
weeks in the October 2008 survey. We estimate a related revenue loss of approximately $0.5 million.
Due to the closing of our Houston call center, which suffered heavy storm damage, additional labor
costs are being incurred as more shifts are being run at our other call centers in order to replace
the lost capacity. We estimate that the business interruption costs associated with the storm will
be approximately $1.0 million. We expect that a portion of these costs will be recovered
through insurance.
Scarborough Research Agreement
Arbitron and a subsidiary of Nielsen entered into a partnership agreement dated December 31,
2004 governing Scarborough Research, a Delaware general partnership (the Partnership). Pursuant
to the terms of the partnership agreement, the Partnership will continue in effect until December
31, 2009, with automatic three-year renewal periods, unless earlier terminated in accordance with
the terms of the partnership agreement. Neither partner provided a notice of termination prior to
the deadline of September 30, 2008. The Partnership has therefore been automatically renewed for
another three years until December 31, 2012.
Discontinued Operation
On January 31, 2008, we sold CSW Research Limited (Continental). Additional information
regarding the sale of Continental is provided in Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Project Apollo LLC
On February 25, 2008, we announced that Arbitron and Nielsen, as sole members, had
agreed to the termination of Project Apollo LLC. Of the $1.9 million recognized by us for our share
of the net costs incurred by Project Apollo LLC for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $1.3
million relates to its wind-down and liquidation, which was completed by June 30, 2008. For the
year ended December 31, 2008, we expect to continue investing in developing opportunities that
leverage our existing PPM technologies and allow us to continue to pursue the idea of
single-source, multimedia measurement.
27
Stock Repurchases
On November 14, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $200.0
million in shares of our outstanding common stock through either periodic open-market or private
transactions at then-prevailing market prices over a period of up to two years through
November 14, 2009. As of September 30, 2008, 2,247,400 shares of outstanding common stock had been
repurchased under this program for $100.0 million.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are both important to the
presentation of our financial position and results of operations, and require our most difficult,
complex or subjective judgments.
We capitalize software development costs with respect to significant internal use software
initiatives or enhancements in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. The costs are capitalized from the
time that the preliminary project stage is completed and management considers it probable that the
software will be used to perform the function intended, until the time the software is placed in
service for its intended use. Once the software is placed in service, the capitalized costs are
amortized over periods of three to five years. We perform an assessment quarterly to determine if
it is probable that all capitalized software will be used to perform its intended function. If an
impairment exists, the software cost is written down to estimated fair value. As of September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, our capitalized software developed for internal use had carrying
amounts of $22.0 million and $20.1 million, respectively, including $13.0 million and $10.2
million, respectively, for software related to the PPM service.
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method,
income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current
year. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are established for the future tax consequences of events
that have been recognized in an entitys financial statements or tax returns. We must make
assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine the current provision for income taxes and also
deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be recorded against a deferred
tax asset. Our assumptions, judgments, and estimates relative to the current provision for income
taxes take into account current tax laws, interpretation of current tax laws and possible outcomes
of current and future audits conducted by domestic and foreign tax authorities. Changes in tax law
or interpretation of tax laws and the resolution of current and future tax audits could
significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in the consolidated financial
statements. Our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to the value of a deferred tax asset
take into account forecasts of the amount and nature of future taxable income. Actual operating
results and the underlying amount and nature of income in future years could differ from current
assumptions, judgments and estimates of recoverable net deferred tax assets. We believe it is more
likely than not that we will realize the benefits of these deferred tax assets. Any changes in the
assumptions, judgments and estimates mentioned above could cause actual income tax obligations to
differ from estimates, thus, impacting our financial position and results of operations.
In accordance with FASB Interpretation (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN No. 48), an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, we
conduct an assessment of the uncertainty in income taxes by establishing recognition thresholds for
our tax positions before being recognized in the financial statements. Inherent in our calculation
are critical judgments by management related to the determination of the basis for our tax
positions. FIN No. 48 provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. For further information, see
Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
28
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
The following table sets forth information with respect to our consolidated statements of income:
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
102,526 |
|
|
$ |
93,322 |
|
|
$ |
9,204 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
41,795 |
|
|
|
34,451 |
|
|
|
7,344 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
20,058 |
|
|
|
18,965 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
9,587 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
72,127 |
|
|
|
63,003 |
|
|
|
9,124 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
70.3 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
30,399 |
|
|
|
30,319 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
Equity in net loss of affiliate(s) |
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
(32.8 |
%) |
|
|
(2.1 |
%) |
|
|
(3.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before interest and tax expense |
|
|
28,205 |
|
|
|
27,056 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(77.1 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
577.9 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
tax expense |
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
|
27,515 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
10,788 |
|
|
|
10,394 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
16,900 |
|
|
|
17,121 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(42.4 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Loss on sale, net of taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(44.4 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16,955 |
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
$ |
(265 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
%) |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per weighted average common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain per share data and percentage amounts may not total due to rounding.
NM not meaningful
29
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT (1) |
|
$ |
28,205 |
|
|
$ |
27,056 |
|
|
$ |
1,149 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
32,763 |
|
|
$ |
30,353 |
|
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT and EBITDA Reconciliation (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
16,900 |
|
|
$ |
17,121 |
|
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
10,788 |
|
|
|
10,394 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Interest (income) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(77.1 |
%) |
Interest expense |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
577.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT (1) |
|
|
28,205 |
|
|
|
27,056 |
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
3,297 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
32,763 |
|
|
$ |
30,353 |
|
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBIT (earnings before interest and income taxes) and EBITDA (earnings before interest, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization) are non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to
investors in evaluating our results. For further discussion of these non-GAAP financial measures,
see paragraph below entitled EBIT and EBITDA of this quarterly report. |
Revenue. Revenue increased 9.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to
the same period in 2007, due primarily to the commercialization of eight additional PPM markets in
the third quarter of 2008 and increases related to the radio ratings subscriber base, contract
renewals, and price escalations in multiyear customer contracts for our PPM service and diary-based
quantitative data license business, partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease related to certain
Scarborough markets delivering in June of this year compared to July of last year.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue increased by 21.3% for the three months ended September 30,
2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in cost of revenue was largely
attributable to $6.0 million of increased costs related to the PPM service, which were
substantially driven by commercialization costs associated with the management and recruitment of
the PPM panels for the New York, Nassau-Suffolk, Middlesex-Somerset-Union, Los Angeles,
Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San Francisco, and San Jose markets, which were launched in the
third quarter of 2008. Increased costs were also incurred during the three months ended September
30, 2008 for those markets scheduled to launch in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter
of 2009, including Atlanta, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Washington, DC., Detroit, and Boston. We expect that
our cost of revenue will continue to increase as a result of our efforts to support the continued
commercialization of this service over the next two to three years. The increase in cost of revenue
was also due to a $2.3 million increase in costs spent in support of our diary rating business,
partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in royalties, substantially related to the timing of
delivery in certain Scarborough markets.
Selling, General, and Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased
by 5.8% during the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007,
due largely to an increase in expenses related to litigation and other interactions with
governmental entities, primarily regarding our PPM radio ratings services.
30
Equity in Net Loss of Affiliate(s). Equity in net loss of affiliate(s) decreased by 32.8%. For
the three months ended September 30, 2007, our share of the Project Apollo LLCs loss was $1.2
million. However, due to the termination of the Project Apollo LLC in June 2008, there was no
comparable activity during the three months ended September 30, 2008. See Note 9 in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further
information.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by 77.1% due to a $36.8 million decrease in the
average aggregate cash and short-term investment balance for the three months ended September 30,
2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for further
information.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by 577.9% due to the interest incurred on average
long-term debt of $70.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to no
borrowings outstanding for the same period in 2007. The interest expense incurred during the three
months ended September 30, 2007 was primarily related to ongoing credit facility fees and the
scheduled amortization of deferred financing costs.
Net Income. Net income decreased by 1.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as
compared to the same period in 2007, due primarily to our continuing efforts to further build and
operate our PPM service panels for markets launched in the third quarter of 2008, including New
York, Nassau-Suffolk, Middlesex-Somerset-Union, Los Angeles, Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San
Francisco, and San Jose; and those markets scheduled to commercialize in the fourth quarter of 2008
and the first quarter of 2009, including Atlanta, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Washington D.C., Detroit, and
Boston. These efforts, including the related revenues generated, resulted in flat operating income
for the third quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. Reductions in affiliate
losses were substantially offset by adverse interest income and expense fluctuations.
EBIT and EBITDA. We believe that presenting EBIT and EBITDA, both non-GAAP financial measures,
as supplemental information helps investors, analysts, and others, if they so choose, in
understanding and evaluating our operating performance in some of the same manners that we do
because EBIT and EBITDA exclude certain items that are not directly related to our core operating
performance. We reference these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing current performance and
making decisions about internal budgets, resource allocation and financial goals. EBIT is
calculated by deducting interest income from continuing operations and adding back interest expense
and income tax expense to income from continuing operations. EBITDA is calculated by deducting
interest income from income from continuing operations and adding back interest expense, income tax expense,
and depreciation and amortization to income from continuing operations. EBIT and EBITDA should not
be considered substitutes either for income from continuing operations, as indicators of our
operating performance, or for cash flow, as measures of our liquidity. In addition, because EBIT
and EBITDA may not be calculated identically by all companies, the presentation here may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. EBIT increased 4.2% and EBITDA
increased 7.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in
2007, due primarily to our increased revenues associated with the eight PPM markets launched in the
third quarter of 2008, substantially offset by our continuing efforts and expenditures to build our
PPM service panels for those eight markets, as well as for other markets scheduled to commercialize
in the fourth quarter of 2008, and the first quarter of 2009. EBIT increased at a slower rate than
EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, due
to increased depreciation and amortization related to increased PPM capital expenditures.
31
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
The following table sets forth information with respect to our consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
275,246 |
|
|
$ |
258,337 |
|
|
$ |
16,909 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
129,490 |
|
|
|
107,918 |
|
|
|
21,572 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
|
|
41.8 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
58,587 |
|
|
|
59,343 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
21.3 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
29,802 |
|
|
|
32,023 |
|
|
|
(2,221 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
%) |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
217,879 |
|
|
|
199,284 |
|
|
|
18,595 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
79.2 |
% |
|
|
77.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
57,367 |
|
|
|
59,053 |
|
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
%) |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
Equity in net loss of affiliates |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
(49.6 |
%) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before interest and tax expense |
|
|
56,394 |
|
|
|
57,123 |
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
(66.6 |
%) |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
432.9 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income
tax expense |
|
|
55,452 |
|
|
|
58,580 |
|
|
|
(3,128 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
%) |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
21,615 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
33,837 |
|
|
|
36,369 |
|
|
|
(2,532 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
%) |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Gain on sale, net of taxes |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
33,822 |
|
|
$ |
36,503 |
|
|
$ |
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
%) |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per weighted average common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic |
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, diluted |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain per share data and percentage amounts may not total due to rounding.
NM not meaningful
32
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT (1) |
|
$ |
56,394 |
|
|
$ |
57,123 |
|
|
$ |
(729 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
69,053 |
|
|
$ |
65,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,246 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT and EBITDA Reconciliation (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
33,837 |
|
|
$ |
36,369 |
|
|
$ |
(2,532 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
%) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
21,615 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
Interest (income) |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
(66.6 |
%) |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
432.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT (1) |
|
|
56,394 |
|
|
|
57,123 |
|
|
|
(729 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,659 |
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (1) |
|
$ |
69,053 |
|
|
$ |
65,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,246 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBIT (earnings before interest and income taxes) and EBITDA (earnings before interest, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization) are non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to
investors in evaluating our results. For further discussion of these non-GAAP financial measures,
see paragraph below entitled EBIT and EBITDA of this quarterly report. |
Revenue. Revenue increased 6.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to
the same period in 2007, due primarily to the commercialization of eight additional PPM markets the
third quarter of 2008, a full nine months of currency revenue associated with the Houston-Galveston
and Philadelphia markets commercialized in the first half of 2007, and increases related to the
radio ratings subscriber base, contract renewals, and price escalations in multiyear customer
contracts for our PPM service and diary-based quantitative data license business.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue increased by 20.0% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in cost of revenue was largely
attributable to $19.1 million of increased costs related to the PPM service, which were
substantially driven by commercialization costs associated
with the management and recruitment of the PPM panels for the New York, Nassau-Suffolk,
Middlesex-Somerset-Union, Los Angeles, Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San Francisco, and San
Jose markets, which were launched in the third quarter of 2008. Increased costs were also incurred
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 for those markets scheduled to launch in the
fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, including Atlanta, Dallas-Ft. Worth,
Washington, DC., Detroit, and Boston. We expect that our cost of revenue will continue to increase
as a result of our efforts to support the continued commercialization of this service over the next
two to three years. This increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the
same period of 2007, also includes a $3.4 million increase in costs spent in support of our diary
rating business, partially offset by a $1.3 million decrease in PPM International costs.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses decreased 6.9% during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in research
and development expenses resulted primarily from a $3.6 million reduction associated with
development of the next generation of our client software, a $1.3 million decrease in expenses
related to the development of our accounts receivable and contract management system, partially
offset by a $1.6 million increase related to applications and infrastructure to support our PPM
service and a $0.8 million increase in information technology overhead and labor costs incurred for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007.
33
Interest Income. Interest income decreased by 66.6% due to a $34.2 million decrease in the
average aggregate cash and short-term investment balance for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for further
information regarding our use of cash.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by 432.9% due to the interest incurred on average
long-term debt of $51.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to no
borrowings outstanding for the same period in 2007. The interest expense incurred during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was primarily related to ongoing credit facility fees and the
scheduled amortization of deferred financing costs.
Income Tax Expense. The effective tax rate from continuing operations increased to 39.0% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, from 37.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
to reflect the increase in certain non-deductible expenses and the increase in certain state income
tax rates.
Net Income. Net income decreased 7.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as
compared to the same period in 2007, due primarily to our continuing efforts to further build and
operate our PPM service panels for markets launched in the third quarter of 2008, including New
York, Nassau-Suffolk, Middlesex-Somerset-Union, Los Angeles, Riverside-San Bernardino, Chicago, San
Francisco, and San Jose; and those markets scheduled to commercialize in the fourth quarter of 2008
and the first quarter of 2009, including Atlanta, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Washington D.C., Detroit, and
Boston. Also, increased interest expense associated with new borrowings and lower interest income
from lower cash balances adversely impacted our results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. These decreases to net income were
partially offset by cost reductions associated with research and development. We expect that the
year-over-year net income reduction trend that was noted for 2008, as well as the previous two
years, will reverse in 2009 as a result of the continued commercialization of our PPM service.
EBIT and EBITDA. We believe that presenting EBIT and EBITDA, both non-GAAP financial measures,
as supplemental information helps investors, analysts, and others, if they so choose, in
understanding and evaluating our operating performance in some of the same manners that we do
because EBIT and EBITDA exclude certain items that are not directly related to our core operating
performance. We reference these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing current performance and
making decisions about internal budgets, resource allocation and financial goals. EBIT is
calculated by deducting interest income from income from continuing operations and adding back
interest expense and income tax expense to income from continuing operations. EBITDA is calculated
by deducting interest income from income from continuing operations and adding back interest
expense, income tax expense, and depreciation and amortization to income from continuing
operations. EBIT and EBITDA should not be considered substitutes either for income from continuing
operations, as indicators of our operating performance, or for cash flow, as measures of our
liquidity. In addition, because EBIT and EBITDA may not be calculated identically by all companies,
the presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other
companies. EBIT decreased slightly by 1.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as
compared to the same period in 2007, due primarily to our continuing efforts and expenditures to
further build our PPM service panels, partially offset by cost reductions related to research and
development and lower affiliate share losses incurred due to our termination of the Project Apollo
LLC in June 2008. In contrast to the decline in EBIT, EBITDA increased 4.9% because this non-GAAP
financial measure excludes depreciation and amortization, which for the nine months ended September
30, 2008, experienced an increasing trend resulting from higher PPM capital expenditures in 2008,
as compared to 2007.
34
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working capital was ($39.2) million and ($45.8) million as of September 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, respectively. Excluding the deferred revenue liability, which does not require a
significant additional cash outlay, working capital was $16.6 million and $20.9 million as of
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents were $8.5
million and $21.1 million as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. We expect
that our cash position as of September 30, 2008, cash flow generated from operations, and our
available revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) will be sufficient to support our
operations for the foreseeable future.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $44.4 million and $40.4 million for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The $4.0 million increase in
net cash provided by operating activities was largely attributable to a $5.3 million increase in
the change in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, resulting primarily from a $5.4
million fluctuation in accruals for payroll and benefit costs, and also a $4.0 million net increase
in depreciation and amortization associated with increased PPM equipment capital expenditures for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. These increases
were partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease associated with changes in deferred revenues and a
$2.5 million decrease in income from continuing operations caused primarily by the scheduled
commercialization of our PPM service in eight markets during the third quarter of 2008. Because
PPM-derived surveys deliver more frequently than diary surveys, revenue was recognized sooner for
these eight markets than historical diary trends and consequently, the reduction of deferred
revenue was greater in 2008 than 2007. The commercialization of the eight markets also required
increased costs to further build and operate our PPM service panels and thus adversely impacted our
income from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the
same period in 2007.
Net cash used in investing activities was $22.2 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2008. Net cash provided by investing activities was $2.1 million for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2007. This $24.2 million cash flow fluctuation related to investing
activities was driven primarily by $19.5 million of net short-term investment sales made during the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. No investment purchases or sales activity occurred during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. Prior to the end of 2007, all of our short-term investments
were sold to supplement our cash flow from operations in the completion of our then authorized
$100.0 million stock repurchase program. For further information regarding the impact to our
consolidated financial statements of our stock repurchase programs, see the discussion of the net
financing activities below.
The change in cash flow associated with investing activities was also impacted by a $7.5
million decrease in cash related to increased capital spending in 2008, primarily related to PPM
equipment and PPM-related software purchases paid during the nine months ended September 2008, as
compared to the same period in 2007, partially offset by a $2.2 million net cash inflow related to
our discontinued operation (i.e., Continental). See Note 3 Discontinued Operations to the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q for further information.
Net cash used in financing activities was $35.9 million and $57.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, respectively. This $21.6 million decrease in net cash used in
financing activities was due largely to $58.0 million in net borrowings made under our Credit
Facility in 2008, partially offset by a $31.3 million increase in stock repurchases, and a $4.7
million reduction in proceeds received from stock option exercises. No net borrowings or net
payments of long-term debt were made during the same period in 2007.
On December 20, 2006, we entered into an agreement with a consortium of lenders to provide up
to $150.0 million of financing to us through a five-year, unsecured revolving credit facility. The
agreement contains an expansion feature for us to increase the total financing available under the
Credit Facility up to $200.0 million with such increased financing to be provided by one or more
existing Credit Facility lending institutions, subject to the approval of the lending banks, and/or
in combination with one or more new lending institutions, subject to the approval of the Credit
Facilitys administrative agent. Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility is calculated
based on a floating rate for a duration of up to six months as selected by us.
35
Our Credit Facility contains financial terms, covenants and operating restrictions that
potentially restrict our financial flexibility. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are
required to maintain certain leverage and coverage ratios and meet other financial conditions. The
agreement potentially limits, among other things, our ability to sell assets, incur additional
indebtedness, and grant or incur liens on its assets. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, all
of our material domestic subsidiaries, if any, guarantee the commitment. Currently, we do not have
any material domestic subsidiaries as defined under the terms of the Credit Facility. Although we
do not believe that the terms of our Credit Facility limit the operation of our business in any
material respect, the terms of the Credit Facility may restrict or prohibit our ability to raise
additional debt capital when needed or could prevent us from investing in other growth initiatives.
Our outstanding borrowings increased from $12.0 million at December 31, 2007, to $70.0 million at
September 30, 2008 to supplement our cash flow from operations in the funding of our outstanding
stock repurchase program. We have been in compliance with the terms of the Credit Facility since
the agreements inception.
On November 14, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $200.0
million in shares of our outstanding common stock through either periodic open-market or private
transactions at then-prevailing market prices over a period of up to
two years through
November 14, 2009. As of September 30, 2008, 2,247,400 shares of outstanding common stock had been
repurchased under this program for $100.0 million.
Commercialization of our PPM radio ratings service requires and will continue to require a
substantial financial investment. We believe our cash generated from operations, as well as access
to our existing credit facility, is sufficient to fund such requirements. We currently estimate
that annual capital expenditures will be approximately $25.0 million in total, with $20.0 million
associated with the commercialization of the PPM ratings service. The amount of capital required
for further deployment of our PPM ratings service and the impact on our results of operations will
be greatly affected by the speed of the commercialization schedule.
During the last three years, our efforts to support the commercialization of our PPM ratings
service have had a material negative impact on our results of operations. Despite the growth in
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we anticipate that we will continue to incur
additional costs related to initiatives designed to improve our PPM service. We expect that our
results of operations for the fourth quarter will be adversely impacted by the incremental costs
incurred in building our PPM ratings service panels while also operating the diary-based ratings
service in the local markets scheduled for commercialization in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the
first quarter of 2009. We currently estimate that based on the current expense rates, the related
2008 legal and governmental expenses could be in the range of $4.0 million to $6.0 million during
the fourth quarter of 2008. Restoration of our operating margins following the completion of the
PPM transition process in the PPM Markets remains our goal, although there can be no
assurance that such restoration will take place.
Seasonality
We recognize revenue for services over the terms of license agreements as services are
delivered, and expenses are recognized as incurred. We currently gather radio-listening data in
302 U.S. local markets, including 292 diary markets and 10 PPM markets. All diary markets are
measured at least twice per year (April-May-June for the Spring Survey and
October-November-December for the Fall Survey). In addition, we measure all major diary markets
two additional times per year (January-February-March for the Winter Survey and
July-August-September for the Summer Survey). Our revenue is generally higher in the first and
third quarters as a result of the delivery of the Fall Survey and Spring Survey, respectively, to
all diary markets compared to revenue in the second and fourth quarters, when delivery of the
Winter Survey and Summer Survey, respectively, is made only to major diary markets. Although
revenue is recognized ratably over the year in both the diary and
PPM services, there will be fluctuations in the depth of the seasonality pattern during the periods
of transition between the services in each PPM Market.
Our expenses are generally higher in the second and fourth quarters as the Spring Survey and
Fall Survey are being conducted for our diary markets. The transition from the diary service to
the PPM service in the PPM Markets will have an impact on the seasonality of costs
and expenses. The larger impact on the seasonality pattern is related to the costs and expenses to
produce the services. PPM costs and expenses will
accelerate six to nine months in advance of the commercialization of each market as the panel
is built. These preliminary costs are incremental to the costs associated with our diary-based
ratings service and will adversely impact the cost pattern associated with our historical
consolidated financial statements.
36
Scarborough experiences losses during the first and third quarters of each year because
revenue is predominantly recognized in the second and fourth quarters when the substantial majority
of services are delivered. Scarborough royalty costs, which are recognized in costs of revenue, are
also higher during the second and fourth quarters.
37
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
The Company holds its cash and cash equivalents in highly liquid securities.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The Companys foreign operations are not significant at this time, and, therefore, its
exposure to foreign currency risk is not material. If we expand our foreign operations, this
exposure to foreign currency rate changes could increase.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of the most recently completed fiscal quarter. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by
this Report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2008, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
38
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved, from time to time, in litigation and proceedings, including with
governmental taxing authorities, arising out of the ordinary course of business. Legal costs for
services rendered in the course of these proceedings are charged to expense as they are incurred.
On April 30, 2008, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension-Annuity Trust Fund
filed a securities class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York on behalf of a purported Class of all purchasers of Arbitron common stock
between July 19, 2007 and November 26, 2007. The plaintiff asserts that Arbitron, Stephen B.
Morris (our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer), and Sean R. Creamer (our Executive
Vice President, Finance and Planning & Chief Financial Officer) violated federal securities laws.
The plaintiff alleges misrepresentations and omissions relating, among other things, to the delay
in commercialization of our Portable People Meter (PPM) radio ratings service in November 2007,
as well as stock sales during the period by company insiders who were not named as defendants and
Messrs. Morris and Creamer. The plaintiff seeks class certification, compensatory damages plus
interest and attorneys fees, among other remedies.
On or about June 13, 2008, a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed against
Arbitron, as a nominal defendant, each of our directors, and certain of our executive officers in
the Supreme Court of the State of New York for New York County. The derivative lawsuit is based on
essentially the same substantive allegations as the securities class action lawsuit. The
derivative lawsuit asserts claims against the defendants for misappropriation of information,
breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, and unjust enrichment. The derivative plaintiff seeks
equitable and/or injunctive relief, restitution and disgorgement of profits, plus attorneys fees
and costs, among other remedies.
On October 6, 2008, we commenced a civil action in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York, seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the
New York Attorney General to prevent any attempt by the New York Attorney General to restrain our publication of our PPM listening estimates. On October 27, 2008, the United States
District Court issued an order dismissing this civil action and on October 31, 2008, we filed a notice of appeal of the District Courts order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
On October 9, 2008, the Company and certain of our executive officers received subpoenas from
the New York Attorney General regarding, among other things, the commercialization of the PPM radio
ratings service in New York and purchases and sales of Arbitron securities by those executive
officers.
On October 10, 2008, we commenced a civil action in the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey, seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against the
New Jersey Attorney General to prevent any attempt by the New Jersey Attorney General to restrain
our publication of our PPM listening estimates.
On October 10, 2008, the State of New York commenced a civil action against the Company in the
Supreme Court of New York for New York County alleging false advertising and deceptive business
practices in violation of New York consumer protection and civil rights laws relating to the
marketing and commercialization in New York of our PPM radio ratings service. The
lawsuit seeks civil penalties and an order preventing us from continuing to publish our
PPM listening estimates in New York.
On October 10, 2008, the State of New Jersey commenced a civil action against us in
the Superior Court of New Jersey for Middlesex County, alleging violations of New Jersey consumer
fraud and civil rights laws relating to the marketing and commercialization in New Jersey of our PPM radio ratings service. The lawsuit seeks civil penalties and an order preventing us from continuing to publish our PPM listening estimates in New Jersey.
The Company intends to defend itself and its interests vigorously against these allegations.
39
Item 1A. Risk Factors
See Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 for a detailed discussion of risk factors affecting Arbitron. As of September 30, 2008,
we updated the following risk factors.
Significant legal proceedings may adversely affect our results of operations.
We are party to a number of legal proceedings and governmental entity investigations and other
interactions. It is possible that the effect of these unresolved matters or costs and expenses
incurred by us in connection with such proceedings or interactions could be material to our
consolidated results of operations for an individual reporting period. For a discussion of these
unresolved matters, see Part II Item 1. Legal Proceedings. These matters have resulted in, and
may continue to result in, a diversion of our managements time and attention.
Loss of our key management or other personnel could adversely impact our business.
Our success is largely dependent on the skills, experience, and efforts of our senior
management and certain other key personnel. If, for any reason, one or more senior executives or
key personnel were not to remain active in our company, our results of operations could be
adversely affected.
We are subject to extensive governmental oversight in the jurisdictions in which we conduct
our business.
Federal, state, and local governmental entities have asserted that our operations are subject
to increasing oversight by them. Our ratings services have undergone a highly public change to
their methodologies of audience rating measurement. In particular, our PPM radio ratings service
has been subject to increasing scrutiny by governmental entities relating, among other things, to
state consumer protection, business, and advertising statutes and we expect increased governmental
oversight relating to this business.
The governmental oversight environment could have a significant effect on us and our
businesses. Among other things, we could be fined, prohibited from engaging in some of our
business activities, or subject to limitations or conditions on our business activities.
Significant governmental oversight action against us could have material adverse financial effects,
cause significant reputational harm, or harm business prospects. New laws or regulations or
changes in the enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to us may also adversely
affect us and our businesses.
If the national and world-wide financial crisis continues or intensifies it could adversely
impact demand for our services.
Continued market disruptions could cause broader economic downturns, which may lead to lower
demand for our services, increased incidence of customers inability to pay their accounts, or
insolvency of our customers, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations,
liquidity, cash flows, and financial condition.
If the national and world-wide financial crisis intensifies, potential disruptions in the
credit markets may adversely affect our business, including the availability and cost of short-term
funds for liquidity requirements and our ability to meet long-term commitments, which could
adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.
If internal funds are not available from our operations we may be required to rely on the
banking and credit markets to meet our financial commitments and short-term liquidity needs.
Disruptions in the capital and credit markets, as have been experienced during 2008, could
adversely affect our ability to draw on our bank revolving credit facility. Our access to funds
under that credit facility is dependent on the ability of the banks that are parties to the
facility to meet their funding commitments. Those banks may not be able to meet their funding
commitments to us if they experience shortages of capital and liquidity or if they experience
excessive volumes of borrowing requests from Arbitron and other borrowers within a short period
of time.
40
Longer term disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing
or increased regulation, reduced alternatives, or failures of significant financial institutions
could adversely affect our access to liquidity needed for our business. Any disruption could
require us to take measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative
credit arrangements or other funding for our business needs can be arranged. Such measures could
include deferring capital expenditures, and reducing or eliminating future share repurchases,
dividend payments or other discretionary uses of cash.
41
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On November 14, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $200.0
million in shares of our outstanding common stock through either periodic open-market or private
transactions at then-prevailing market prices over a period of up to two years through November 14,
2009. The following table outlines the stock repurchase activity during the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Maximum Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares Purchased |
|
|
of Shares That May |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Announced Program |
|
|
Program |
|
July 1-31 |
|
|
588,400 |
|
|
$ |
45.94 |
|
|
|
588,400 |
|
|
$ |
113,236,843 |
|
August 1-31 |
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
45.80 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
108,084,493 |
|
September 1-30 |
|
|
174,600 |
|
|
|
46.29 |
|
|
|
174,600 |
|
|
|
100,001,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
875,500 |
|
|
$ |
45.99 |
|
|
|
875,500 |
|
|
$ |
100,001,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.1
|
|
Arbitron Inc. 2008 Equity Compensation Plan |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Arbitron Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.3
|
|
Form of Executive Retention Agreement |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
42
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARBITRON INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ SEAN R. CREAMER
|
|
|
|
Sean R. Creamer |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Finance and Planning
and Chief Financial Officer (on behalf of the
registrant and as the registrants principal
financial and principal accounting officer)
|
|
|
Date: November 4, 2008 |
|
|
43