By:
|
/s/ Pedro Toll
|
Name:
|
Pedro Toll
|
Title:
|
General Manager
|
|
·
|
Second quarter 2011 Net Income (*) amounted to $25.7 million, a $24.0 million improvement over the second quarter 2010, and a $9.4 million, or 58% increase compared to the first quarter 2011. Net Income during the first six months 2011 reached $42.0 million, a $30.3 million, or 258%, increase compared to the same period 2010, mainly as the result of increased net interest income from the Commercial Portfolio and higher trading gains in the Investment Fund.
|
|
·
|
Increased Net Income resulted in a 14.3% return on the Bank’s average stockholders’ equity (“ROE”) in the second quarter 2011, and 11.9% during the first six months 2011. As of June 30, 2011, the Bank’s Tier 1 capital ratio stood at 18.1% compared to 23.4% as of June 30, 2010, and 19.3% as of March 31, 2011. The Bank’s equity consists entirely of issued and fully paid ordinary common stock.
|
|
·
|
Year-on-year, the Commercial Portfolio grew $1.7 billion, or 47%, and $456 million, or 10%, versus the previous quarter to reach $5.2 billion. Second quarter 2011 credit disbursements amounted to $3.2 billion, compared to $1.6 billion in the same period 2010, and $2.3 billion in the first quarter 2011.
|
|
·
|
In the second quarter 2011, the Commercial Division’s net operating revenues reached $23.7 million, an increase of 21% over the same period 2010, and 5% over the first quarter 2011. The Division’s Net Income in the second quarter 2011 totaled $13.3 million, compared to $13.9 million in the second quarter 2010, and $13.6 million in the first quarter 2011. During the second quarter 2011, portfolio growth implied the creation of generic provisions, which grew $0.5 million, along with increased balances in the Commercial Portfolio.
|
|
·
|
The Treasury Division posted Net Income of $1.1 million in the second quarter 2011, compared to a Net Loss of $2.8 million in the second quarter 2010, and a Net Loss of $0.9 million in the first quarter 2011, mainly attributable to gains on the sale of securities available for sale and the positive impact of variation on valuations of hedging instruments.
|
|
·
|
Funding costs continued to improve as the weighted average funding cost in the second quarter 2011 stood at 1.08%, a decrease of 1 bp compared to the first quarter 2011, and a decrease of 18 bps, compared to the second quarter 2010, while during the first six months 2011, the weighted average funding cost decreased 26 bps to 1.08%, compared to the same period 2010.
|
|
·
|
Net interest margin stood at 1.75% in the second quarter 2011, compared to 1.67% in the second quarter 2010, and 1.72% in the first quarter 2011. During the first six months 2011, net interest margin improved to 1.74% compared to 1.69% in the same period 2010.
|
|
·
|
Net interest income amounted to $23.5 million in the second quarter 2011, a $6.3 million, or 37%, increase when compared to the second quarter 2010, and $2.1 million, or 10%, increase when compared to the first quarter 2011. During the first six months of 2011, net interest income amounted to $44.9 million, an increase of $11.4 million, or 34%, compared to $33.5 million in the same period 2010, mainly as a result of higher average interest-earning assets balances.
|
|
·
|
The Asset Management Unit recorded Net Income of $11.3 million in the second quarter 2011, compared to a Net Loss of $9.4 million in the same period 2010, and Net Income of $3.6 million in the first quarter 2011. The increases of $20.7 million and $7.7 million, respectively, were mainly attributable to net gains from trading activities in the Bladex Capital Growth Fund (BCGF, the Investment Fund).
|
|
·
|
As of June 30, 2011, the non-accrual portfolio stood at $29.0 million, a decrease of 36% compared to $45.3 million as of June 30, 2010, and the same level as of March 31, 2011. Principal amounts past due in the entire loan portfolio remained at $1.0 million. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to the Commercial Portfolio stood at 1.8% as of June 30, 2011, compared to 2.7% as of June 30, 2010, and 1.9% as of March 31, 2011, while the ratio of non-accruing loans to the loan portfolio stood at 0.6%, 1.5%, and 0.7%, respectively, as of these dates.
|
|
·
|
The Bank’s efficiency ratio improved to 33% in the second quarter 2011, compared to 120% in the second quarter 2010, and 40% in the first quarter 2011. The efficiency ratio during the first six months 2011 improved to 36%, compared to 82% during the first six months 2010, as revenue growth outpaced expense growth.
|
(US$ million, except percentages and per share amounts)
|
6M11
|
6M10
|
2Q11
|
1Q11
|
2Q10
|
|||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income
|
$ | 44.9 | $ | 33.5 | $ | 23.5 | $ | 21.4 | $ | 17.2 | ||||||||||
Net Operating Income (Loss) by Business Segment:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Division
|
$ | 27.7 | $ | 23.4 | $ | 13.9 | $ | 13.9 | $ | 13.0 | ||||||||||
Treasury Division
|
$ | 0.3 | $ | (5.5 | ) | $ | 1.1 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | (2.8 | ) | |||||||
Asset Management Unit
|
$ | 15.5 | $ | (13.5 | ) | $ | 11.7 | $ | 3.8 | $ | (11.8 | ) | ||||||||
Net Operating Income (loss)
|
$ | 43.5 | $ | 4.4 | $ | 26.7 | $ | 16.8 | $ | (1.6 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 42.6 | $ | 9.0 | $ | 26.1 | $ | 16.5 | $ | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the redeemable noncontrolling interest
|
$ | 0.6 | $ | (2.8 | ) | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.2 | $ | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||
Net Income attributable to Bladex
|
$ | 42.0 | $ | 11.8 | $ | 25.7 | $ | 16.3 | $ | 1.7 | ||||||||||
Net Income per Share (1)
|
$ | 1.14 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||
Book Value per common share (period end)
|
$ | 19.73 | $ | 18.35 | $ | 19.73 | $ | 19.25 | $ | 18.35 | ||||||||||
Return on Average Equity (“ROE”)
|
11.9 | % | 3.5 | % | 14.3 | % | 9.4 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Operating Return on Average Equity ("Operating ROE") (2)
|
12.3 | % | 1.3 | % | 14.9 | % | 9.7 | % | -1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Return on Average Assets (“ROA”)
|
1.6 | % | 0.6 | % | 1.9 | % | 1.3 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||
Net Interest Margin
|
1.74 | % | 1.69 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.72 | % | 1.67 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency Ratio (3)
|
36 | % | 82 | % | 33 | % | 40 | % | 120 | % | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (4)
|
$ | 731 | $ | 680 | $ | 731 | $ | 709 | $ | 680 | ||||||||||
Total Capital (5)
|
$ | 782 | $ | 716 | $ | 782 | $ | 755 | $ | 716 | ||||||||||
Risk-Weighted Assets
|
$ | 4,047 | $ | 2,899 | $ | 4,047 | $ | 3,681 | $ | 2,899 | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (4)
|
18.1 | % | 23.4 | % | 18.1 | % | 19.3 | % | 23.4 | % | ||||||||||
Total Capital Ratio (5)
|
19.3 | % | 24.7 | % | 19.3 | % | 20.5 | % | 24.7 | % | ||||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity
|
$ | 731 | $ | 673 | $ | 731 | $ | 709 | $ | 673 | ||||||||||
Stockholders’ Equity to Total Assets
|
12.6 | % | 15.2 | % | 12.6 | % | 13.4 | % | 15.2 | % | ||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income Account ("OCI")
|
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | |||||
Leverage (times) (6)
|
7.9 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 6.6 | |||||||||||||||
Liquid Assets / Total Assets (7)
|
6.0 | % | 13.5 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.1 | % | 13.5 | % | ||||||||||
Liquid Assets / Total Deposits
|
16.8 | % | 39.4 | % | 16.8 | % | 16.9 | % | 39.4 | % | ||||||||||
Non-Accruing Loans to Total Loans, net
|
0.6 | % | 1.5 | % | 0.6 | % | 0.7 | % | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||
Allowance for Credit Losses to Commercial Portfolio
|
1.8 | % | 2.7 | % | 1.8 | % | 1.9 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 5,807 | $ | 4,412 | $ | 5,807 | $ | 5,301 | $ | 4,412 |
§
|
Quarterly dividend payment: During the Board of Director’s meeting held July 18, 2011, the Bank’s Board approved a quarterly common dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to the second quarter 2011. The dividend will be paid August 9, 2011, to stockholders registered as of August 1, 2011.
|
§
|
New Representative Office: On July 7, 2011, the Bank inaugurated a new representative office in Lima, Peru.
|
(1)
|
Net Income per Share calculations are based on the average number of shares outstanding during each period.
|
(2)
|
Operating ROE: Annualized net operating income divided by average stockholders’ equity.
|
(3)
|
Efficiency ratio refers to consolidated operating expenses as a percentage of net operating revenues.
|
(4)
|
Tier 1 Capital is calculated according to Basel I capital adequacy guidelines, and is equivalent to stockholders’ equity excluding the OCI effect of the available for sale portfolio. Tier 1 Capital ratio is calculated as a percentage of risk weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets are, in turn, also calculated based on Basel I capital adequacy guidelines.
|
(5)
|
Total Capital refers to Tier 1 Capital plus Tier 2 Capital, based on Basel I capital adequacy guidelines. Total Capital ratio refers to Total Capital as a percentage of risk weighted assets.
|
(6)
|
Leverage corresponds to assets divided by stockholders’ equity.
|
(7)
|
Liquidity ratio refers to liquid assets as a percentage of total assets. Liquid assets consist of investment-grade ‘A’ securities, and cash and due from banks, excluding pledged regulatory deposits.
|
This press release contains forward-looking statements of expected future developments. The Bank wishes to ensure that such statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements pursuant to the safe harbor established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements in this press release refer to the growth of the credit portfolio, including the trade portfolio, the increase in the number of the Bank’s corporate clients, the positive trend of lending spreads, the increase in activities engaged in by the Bank that are derived from the Bank’s client base, anticipated operating income and return on equity in future periods, including income derived from the Treasury Division and Asset Management Unit, the improvement in the financial and performance strength of the Bank and the progress the Bank is making. These forward-looking statements reflect the expectations of the Bank’s management and are based on currently available data; however, actual experience with respect to these factors is subject to future events and uncertainties, which could materially impact the Bank’s expectations. Among the factors that can cause actual performance and results to differ materially are as follows: the anticipated growth of the Bank’s credit portfolio; the continuation of the Bank’s preferred creditor status; the impact of increasing/decreasing interest rates and of the macroeconomic environment in the Region on the Bank’s financial condition; the execution of the Bank’s strategies and initiatives, including its revenue diversification strategy; the adequacy of the Bank’s allowance for credit losses; the need for additional provisions for credit losses; the Bank’s ability to achieve future growth, to reduce its liquidity levels and increase its leverage; the Bank’s ability to maintain its investment-grade credit ratings; the availability and mix of future sources of funding for the Bank’s lending operations; potential trading losses; the possibility of fraud; and the adequacy of the Bank’s sources of liquidity to replace deposit withdrawals.
|