Edgar Filing: TEXTRON INC

tenq.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[ X ]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2011

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number 1-5480

Textron Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		05-0315468
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

40 Westminster Street, Providence, RI		02903
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

(401) 421-2800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ü No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ü ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No ü

As of April 15, 2011, there were 276,619,984 shares of common stock outstanding.

TEXTRON INC.

INDEX

			Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)		3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		5
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Note 1:	Basis of Presentation	7
	Note 2:	Special Charges	7
	Note 3:	Retirement Plans	8
	Note 4:	Share-Based Compensation	8
	Note 5:	Comprehensive Income	9
	Note 6:	Earnings Per Share and Shareholders’ Equity	10
	Note 7:	Accounts Receivable and Finance Receivables	10
	Note 8:	Inventories	15
	Note 9:	Debt	15
	Note 10:	Accrued Liabilities	15
	Note 11:	Commitments and Contingencies	15
	Note 12:	Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements	16
	Note 13:	Income Tax Expense	18
	Note 14:	Segment Information	18
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		29

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5.	Other Information		29
Item 6.	Exhibits		31
	Signatures		31

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TEXTRON INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
(In millions, except per share amounts)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Revenues
Manufacturing revenues	$	2,453		$	2,134
Finance revenues		26			76
Total revenues		2,479			2,210
Costs, expenses and other
Cost of sales		2,055			1,776
Selling and administrative expense		304			285
Provision for losses on finance receivables		12			55
Interest expense		62			71
Special charges		—			12
Total costs, expenses and other		2,433			2,199
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		46			11
Income tax expense		15			15
Income (loss) from continuing operations		31			(4	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(2	)		(4	)
Net income (loss)	$	29		$	(8	)
Basic earnings per share
Continuing operations	$	0.11		$	(0.01	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		(0.02	)
Basic earnings per share	$	0.10		$	(0.03	)
Diluted earnings per share
Continuing operations	$	0.10		$	(0.01	)
Discontinued operations		(0.01	)		(0.02	)
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.09		$	(0.03	)
Dividends per share
Common stock	$	0.02		$	0.02

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

TEXTRON INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
Assets
Manufacturing group
Cash and equivalents	$	986		$	898
Accounts receivable, net		910			892
Inventories		2,453			2,277
Other current assets		1,050			980
Total current assets		5,399			5,047
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $2,968 and $2,869		1,950			1,932
Goodwill		1,643			1,632
Other assets		1,659			1,722
Total Manufacturing group assets		10,651			10,333
Finance group
Cash and equivalents		36			33
Finance receivables held for investment, net		3,566			3,871
Finance receivables held for sale		237			413
Other assets		569			632
Total Finance group assets		4,408			4,949
Total assets	$	15,059		$	15,282
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Liabilities
Manufacturing group
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt	$	216		$	19
Accounts payable		748			622
Accrued liabilities		1,829			2,016
Total current liabilities		2,793			2,657
Other liabilities		2,986			2,993
Long-term debt		2,333			2,283
Total Manufacturing group liabilities		8,112			7,933
Finance group
Other liabilities		352			391
Due to Manufacturing group		391			326
Debt		3,152			3,660
Total Finance group liabilities		3,895			4,377
Total liabilities		12,007			12,310
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock		35			35
Capital surplus		1,299			1,301
Retained earnings		3,061			3,037
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,280	)		(1,316	)
		3,115			3,057
Less cost of treasury shares		63			85
Total shareholders’ equity		3,052			2,972
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	15,059		$	15,282
Common shares outstanding (in thousands)		276,520			275,739

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

TEXTRON INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively

	Consolidated
(In millions)	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	29		$	(8	)
Loss from discontinued operations		(2	)		(4	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		31			(4	)
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Non-cash items:
Depreciation and amortization		95			90
Provision for losses on finance receivables held for investment		12			55
Portfolio losses on finance receivables		23			28
Deferred income taxes		79			(13	)
Other, net		21			31
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(4	)		(76	)
Inventories		(166	)		(211	)
Other assets		2			7
Accounts payable		119			184
Accrued and other liabilities		(229	)		(259	)
Captive finance receivables, net		72			78
Other operating activities, net		—			1
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations		55			(89	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations		(1	)		1
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		54			(88	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Finance receivables originated or purchased		(76	)		(145	)
Finance receivables repaid		290			501
Proceeds on receivables sales		168			277
Capital expenditures		(78	)		(38	)
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets and properties		28			32
Other investing activities, net		23			12
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations		355			639
Cash flows from financing activities:
Increase in short-term debt		203			—
Payments on long-term lines of credit		(250	)		—
Principal payments on long-term debt		(417	)		(936	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		144			20
Proceeds from option exercises		3			—
Dividends paid		(5	)		(5	)
Other financing activities, net		(5	)		—
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations		(327	)		(921	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents		9			(13	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents		91			(383	)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period		931			1,892
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	1,022		$	1,509

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

TEXTRON INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (Continued)

For the Three Months Ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively

	Manufacturing Group						Finance Group
(In millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	60		$	31		$	(31	)	$	(39	)
Loss from discontinued operations		(2	)		(4	)		—			—
Income (loss) from continuing operations		62			35			(31	)		(39	)
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Dividends received from TFC		130			125			—			—
Capital contribution paid to TFC		(63	)		(75	)		—			—
Non-cash items:
Depreciation and amortization		87			82			8			8
Provision for losses on finance receivables held for investment		—			—			12			55
Portfolio losses on finance receivables		—			—			23			28
Deferred income taxes		66			16			13			(29	)
Other, net		32			27			(11	)		4
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(4	)		(76	)		—			—
Inventories		(169	)		(207	)		—			—
Other assets		(1	)		8			—			(4	)
Accounts payable		119			184			—			—
Accrued and other liabilities		(186	)		(186	)		(43	)		(73	)
Other operating activities, net		—			1			—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations		73			(66	)		(29	)		(50	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations		(1	)		1			—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		72			(65	)		(29	)		(50	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Finance receivables originated or purchased		—			—			(125	)		(226	)
Finance receivables repaid		—			—			411			660
Proceeds on receivables sales		—			—			168			277
Capital expenditures		(78	)		(38	)		—			—
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets and properties		—			—			28			32
Other investing activities, net		(43	)		(37	)		31			28
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations		(121	)		(75	)		513			771
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on long-term lines of credit		—			—			(250	)		—
Increase in short-term debt		203			—			—			—
Intergroup financing		(60	)		(150	)		60			150
Principal payments on long-term debt		(7	)		(11	)		(410	)		(925	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			—			144			20
Proceeds from option exercises		3			—			—			—
Capital contributions paid to TFC under Support Agreement		—			—			63			75
Other capital contributions paid to Finance Group		—			—			40			20
Dividends paid		(5	)		(5	)		(130	)		(125	)
Other financing activities, net		(5	)		—			1			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations		129			(166	)		(482	)		(785	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents		8			(12	)		1			(1	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents		88			(318	)		3			(65	)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period		898			1,748			33			144
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	986		$	1,430		$	36		$	79

See Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

TEXTRON INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Textron Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries. We have prepared these unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for interim financial information. Accordingly, these interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements. The consolidated interim financial statements included in this quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for the fair presentation of our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

Our financings are conducted through two separate borrowing groups. The Manufacturing group consists of Textron Inc. consolidated with its majority-owned subsidiaries that operate in the Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments. The Finance group, which also is the Finance segment, consists of Textron Financial Corporation (TFC), its consolidated subsidiaries and three other finance subsidiaries owned by Textron Inc. We designed this framework to enhance our borrowing power by separating the Finance group. Our Manufacturing group operations include the development, production and delivery of tangible goods and services, while our Finance group provides financial services. Due to the fundamental differences between each borrowing group’s activities, investors, rating agencies and analysts use different measures to evaluate each group’s performance. To support those evaluations, we present balance sheet and cash flow information for each borrowing group within the consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated from the consolidated financial statements, including retail and wholesale financing activities for inventory sold by our Manufacturing group and financed by our Finance group.

Note 2: Special Charges

In 2010, special charges included restructuring costs incurred under a restructuring program that was completed at the end of 2010. There were no special charges in the first quarter of 2011.

Restructuring costs by segment and type for the three months ended April 3, 2010 are as follows:

(In millions)	Severance Costs			Contract Terminations		Total
Cessna	$	8		$	2	$	10
Bell		1			—		1
Finance		3			—		3
Corporate		(2	)		—		(2	)
	$	10		$	2	$	12

An analysis of our restructuring reserve activity is summarized below:

(In millions)	Severance Costs			Contract Terminations			Total
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	57		$	5		$	62
Cash paid		(23	)		(1	)		(24	)
Balance at April 2, 2011	$	34		$	4		$	38

Note 3: Retirement Plans

We provide defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits to eligible employees. The components of net periodic benefit cost for these plans are as follows:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010			April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Three Months Ended
Service cost	$	32		$	31		$	2		$	2
Interest cost		82			79			8			8
Expected return on plan assets		(98	)		(92	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		4			4			(1	)		(1	)
Amortization of net loss		19			9			3			3
Net periodic benefit cost	$	39		$	31		$	12		$	12

Note 4: Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense includes restricted stock and stock option awards, as well as performance share units, restricted stock units, and deferred income plan stock unit awards which are payable in cash. The compensation expense we recorded in net income (loss) for our share-based compensation plans is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Compensation expense	$	36		$	23
Hedge income		—			(2	)
Income tax benefit		(13	)		(9	)
Total net compensation cost included in net income (loss)	$	23		$	12

Stock Options

The stock option compensation cost calculated under the fair value approach is recognized over the vesting period of the stock options. The weighted-average fair value of options granted per share was $10 and $7 in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. We estimate the fair value of options granted on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities consider implied volatilities from traded options on our common stock, historical volatilities and other factors. We use historical data to estimate option exercise behavior, adjusted to reflect anticipated changes in expected life. The weighted-average assumptions used in our Black-Scholes option-pricing model for awards issued during the respective periods are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Dividend yield		0.3	%		0.4	%
Expected volatility		38.0	%		37.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.4	%		2.6	%
Expected lives (In years)		5.5			5.5

Stock option activity for the first quarter of 2011 is as follows:

	Shares Under Options (In thousands)			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (In years)
Outstanding at beginning of period		6,926		$	28.15		5.0
Granted		2,656			26.25
Exercised		(76	)		18.59
Canceled, expired or forfeited		(107	)		28.69
Outstanding at end of period		9,399		$	27.68		7.0
Exercisable at end of period		4,719		$	31.48		4.7

At April 2, 2011, our outstanding and exercisable options had an aggregate intrinsic value of $40 million and $20 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units

The 2011 activity for restricted stock units payable in stock and for restricted stock units payable in cash is provided below:

	Units Payable in Stock						Units Payable in Cash
(Shares in thousands)	Number of Shares			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value			Number of Shares			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year, nonvested		762		$	47.55			3,472		$	14.60
Granted		278			26.25			663			26.25
Vested		(290	)		(46.34	)		(769	)		(12.92	)
Forfeited		(21	)		(48.75	)		(89	)		(15.49	)
Outstanding at end of period, nonvested		729		$	39.87			3,277		$	17.32

Performance Share Units

The fair value of share-based compensation awards accounted for as liabilities includes performance share units. The fair value of these awards is based on the trading price of our common stock, less adjustments to reflect the fair value of certain awards for which dividends are not paid or accrued until vested, and is remeasured at each reporting period date. The 2011 activity for our performance share units is as follows:

(Shares in thousands)	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at beginning of year, nonvested		1,897	$	9.59
Granted		411		26.25
Outstanding at end of period, nonvested		2,308	$	12.56

Share-Based Compensation Awards

The value of the share-based compensation awards that vested and/or were paid during the respective periods is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011		April 3, 2010
Subject only to service conditions:
Value of shares, options or units vested	$	34	$	36
Intrinsic value of cash awards paid		20		8
Subject to performance vesting conditions:
Value of units vested		—		—
Intrinsic value of cash awards paid		1		5
Intrinsic value of amounts paid under Deferred Income Plan		—		8

Note 5: Comprehensive Income

Our comprehensive income, net of taxes, is provided below:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011		April 3, 2010
Net income (loss)	$	29	$	(8	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Recognition of prior service cost and unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits		18		10
Deferred gains on hedge contracts		6		7
Foreign currency translation and other		12		(9	)
Comprehensive income	$	65	$	—

Note 6: Earnings Per Share and Shareholders’ Equity

Earnings Per Share

We calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) based on net income, which approximates income available to common shareholders for each period. Basic earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method, which includes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and restricted stock units to be paid in stock that are deemed participating securities as they provide nonforfeitable rights to dividends. Diluted earnings per share considers the dilutive effect of all potential future common stock, including stock options, restricted stock units and the shares that could be issued upon the conversion of our 4.50% Convertible Notes and upon the exercise of the related warrants. The convertible note call options purchased in connection with the issuance of the 4.50% Convertible Notes are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as their impact is always anti-dilutive.

Upon conversion of our 4.50% Convertible Notes, as described in Note 9, the principal amount would be settled in cash and the excess of the conversion value, as defined, over the principal amount may be settled in cash and/or shares of our common stock. Therefore, only the shares of our common stock potentially issuable with respect to the excess of the notes’ conversion value over the principal amount, if any, are considered as dilutive potential common shares for purposes of calculating diluted EPS.

The weighted-average shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	April 2, 2011		April 3, 2010
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding		276,358		273,174
Dilutive effect of Convertible Notes, warrants, stock options and restricted stock units		42,761		—
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		319,119		273,174

Stock options to purchase 4 million and 7 million shares of common stock outstanding are excluded from our calculation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the three months ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively, as the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of our common stock for the periods. These securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future.

For the three months ended April 3, 2010, the potential dilutive effect of 28 million weighted-average shares of Convertible Notes, warrants, stock options and restricted stock units was excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding as the shares would have an anti-dilutive effect on the loss from continuing operations.

Note 7: Accounts Receivable and Finance Receivables

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable is composed of the following:

(In millions)	April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
Commercial	$	607		$	496
U.S. Government contracts		321			416
		928			912
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(18	)		(20	)
	$	910		$	892

We have unbillable receivables on U.S. Government contracts that arise when the revenues we have appropriately recognized based on performance cannot be billed yet under terms of the contract. Unbillable receivables within accounts receivable totaled $155 million at April 2, 2011 and $195 million at January 1, 2011.

Finance Receivables

Finance receivables by product line, which includes both finance receivables held for investment and finance receivables held for sale, are presented in the following table:

(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011				January 1, 2011
Aviation	$	2,028	49	%	$	2,120	46	%
Golf equipment		192	4			212	5
Golf mortgage		818	20			876	19
Timeshare		622	15			894	19
Structured capital		317	8			317	7
Other liquidating		164	4			207	4
Total finance receivables		4,141	100	%		4,626	100	%
Less: Allowance for losses		338				342
Less: Finance receivables held for sale		237				413
Total finance receivables held for investment, net	$	3,566			$	3,871

Credit Quality Indicators and Nonaccrual Finance Receivables

We internally assess the quality of our finance receivables held for investment portfolio based on a number of key credit quality indicators and statistics such as delinquency, loan balance to collateral value, the liquidity position of individual borrowers and guarantors, debt service coverage in the golf mortgage product line and default rates of our notes receivable collateral in the timeshare product line. Because many of these indicators are difficult to apply across an entire class of receivables, we evaluate individual loans on a quarterly basis and classify these loans/portfolios into three categories based on the key credit quality indicators for the individual loan. These three categories are performing, watchlist and nonaccrual.

We classify finance receivables held for investment as nonaccrual if credit quality indicators suggest full collection is doubtful. In addition, we automatically classify accounts as nonaccrual that are contractually delinquent by more than three months unless collection is not doubtful. Cash payments on nonaccrual accounts, including finance charges, generally are applied to reduce the net investment balance. We resume the accrual of interest when the loan becomes contractually current through payment according to the original terms of the loan or, if a loan has been modified, following a period of performance under the terms of the modification, provided we conclude that collection of all principal and interest is no longer doubtful. Previously suspended interest income is recognized at that time.

Accounts are classified as watchlist when credit quality indicators have deteriorated as compared with typical underwriting criteria, and we believe collection of full principal and interest is probable but not certain. All other finance receivables held for investment that do not meet the watchlist or nonaccrual categories are classified as performing.

A summary of finance receivables held for investment categorized based on the internally assigned credit quality indicators discussed above is as follows:

	April 2, 2011											January 1, 2011
(In millions)	Performing			Watchlist			Nonaccrual			Total		Performing			Watchlist			Nonaccrual			Total
Aviation	$	1,641		$	219		$	168		$	2,028	$	1,713		$	238		$	169		$	2,120
Golf equipment		122			46			24			192		138			51			23			212
Golf mortgage		205			200			235			640		163			303			219			685
Timeshare		166			40			357			563		222			77			382			681
Structured capital		290			27			—			317		290			27			—			317
Other liquidating		98			14			52			164		130			11			57			198
Total	$	2,522		$	546		$	836		$	3,904	$	2,656		$	707		$	850		$	4,213
% of Total		64.6	%		14.0	%		21.4	%				63.0	%		16.8	%		20.2	%

We measure delinquency based on the contractual payment terms of our loans and leases. In determining the delinquency aging category of an account, any/all principal and interest received is applied to the most past-due principal and/or interest amounts due. If a significant portion of the contractually due payment is delinquent, the entire finance receivable balance is reported in accordance with the most past-due delinquency aging category.

Finance receivables held for investment by delinquency aging category is summarized in the tables below:

(In millions)	Less Than 31 Days Past Due		31-60 Days Past Due		61-90 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total
April 2, 2011
Aviation	$	1,857	$	101	$	28	$	42	$	2,028
Golf equipment		162		10		4		16		192
Golf mortgage		527		11		3		99		640
Timeshare		326		38		80		119		563
Structured capital		317		—		—		—		317
Other liquidating		135		2		1		26		164
Total	$	3,324	$	162	$	116	$	302	$	3,904
January 1, 2011
Aviation	$	1,964	$	67	$	41	$	48	$	2,120
Golf equipment		171		13		9		19		212
Golf mortgage		543		12		7		123		685
Timeshare		533		14		6		128		681
Structured capital		317		—		—		—		317
Other liquidating		166		2		1		29		198
Total	$	3,694	$	108	$	64	$	347	$	4,213

At April 2, 2011, accrual status loans that were 90 days past due totaled $8 million. We had no accrual status loans that were 90 days past due at January 1, 2011. At April 2, 2011, the 60+ days contractual delinquency as a percentage of finance receivables held for investment was 10.71%, compared with 9.77% at January 1, 2011.

Impaired Loans

We evaluate individual finance receivables held for investment in non-homogeneous portfolios and larger accounts in homogeneous loan portfolios for impairment on a quarterly basis. Finance receivables classified as held for sale are reflected at the lower of cost or fair value and are excluded from these evaluations.

A finance receivable is considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on our review of the credit quality indicators discussed above. Impaired finance receivables include both nonaccrual accounts and accounts for which full collection of principal and interest remains probable, but the account’s original terms have been, or are expected to be, significantly modified. If the modification specifies an interest rate equal to or greater than a market rate for a finance receivable with comparable risk, the account is not considered impaired in years subsequent to the modification. No significant interest income was recognized on impaired loans in the first quarter of 2011 or 2010.

The average recorded investment in impaired loans for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 are provided below:

(In millions)	Aviation		Golf Equipment		Golf Mortgage		Timeshare		Other Liquidating		Total
For the three months ended April 2, 2011
Impaired loans with a related allowance for losses recorded	$	145	$	5	$	190	$	341	$	18	$	699
Impaired loans with no related allowance for losses recorded		19		—		90		33		22		164
Total	$	164	$	5	$	280	$	374	$	40	$	863
For the three months ended April 3, 2010
Impaired loans with a related allowance for losses recorded	$	240	$	3	$	186	$	352	$	27	$	808
Impaired loans with no related allowance for losses recorded		12		1		111		54		63		241
Total	$	252	$	4	$	297	$	406	$	90	$	1,049

A summary of impaired finance receivables and related allowance for losses is provided below:

(In millions)	Aviation		Golf Equipment		Golf Mortgage		Timeshare		Other Liquidating		Total
April 2, 2011
Impaired loans with a related allowance for losses recorded:
Recorded investment	$	144	$	6	$	205	$	327	$	19	$	701
Unpaid principal balance		146		6		215		367		25		759
Related allowance		50		1		45		102		4		202
Impaired loans with no related allowance for losses recorded:
Recorded investment		20		—		94		41		19		174
Unpaid principal balance		20		—		98		41		75		234
Total impaired loans:
Recorded investment		164		6		299		368		38		875
Unpaid principal balance		166		6		313		408		100		993
Related allowance		50		1		45		102		4		202
January 1, 2011
Impaired loans with a related allowance for losses recorded:
Recorded investment	$	147	$	4	$	175	$	355	$	16	$	697
Unpaid principal balance		144		5		178		385		15		727
Related allowance		45		2		39		102		3		191
Impaired loans with no related allowance for losses recorded:
Recorded investment		17		—		138		69		30		254
Unpaid principal balance		21		—		146		74		89		330
Total impaired loans:
Recorded investment		164		4		313		424		46		951
Unpaid principal balance		165		5		324		459		104		1,057
Related allowance		45		2		39		102		3		191

Allowance for Losses We maintain the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment at a level considered adequate to cover inherent losses in the portfolio based on management’s evaluation and analysis by product line. For larger balance accounts specifically identified as impaired, including large accounts in homogeneous portfolios, a reserve is established based on comparing the carrying value with either a) the expected future cash flows, discounted at the finance receivable’s effective interest rate; or b) the fair value, if the finance receivable is collateral dependent. The expected future cash flows consider collateral value; financial performance and liquidity of our borrower; existence and financial strength of guarantors; estimated recovery costs, including legal expenses; and costs associated with the repossession/foreclosure and eventual disposal of collateral. When there is a range of potential outcomes, we perform multiple discounted cash flow analyses and weight the outcomes based on their relative likelihood of occurrence.

The evaluation of our portfolios is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired finance receivables and the underlying collateral, which may differ from actual results. While our analysis is specific to each individual account, the most critical factors included in this analysis vary by product line. For the aviation product line, these factors include industry valuation guides, physical condition of the aircraft, payment history, and existence and financial strength of guarantors. For the golf equipment line, the critical factors are the age and condition of the collateral, while the factors for the golf mortgage line include historical golf course, hotel or marina cash flow performance; estimates of golf rounds and price per round or occupancy and room rates; market discount and capitalization rates; and existence and financial strength of guarantors. For the timeshare product line, the critical factors are the historical performance of consumer notes receivable collateral, real estate valuations, operating expenses of the borrower, the impact of bankruptcy court rulings on the value of the collateral, legal and other professional expenses and borrower’s access to capital.

We also establish an allowance for losses by product line to cover probable but specifically unknown losses existing in the portfolio. For homogeneous portfolios, including the aviation and golf equipment product lines, the allowance is established as a percentage of non-recourse finance receivables, which have not been identified as requiring specific reserves. The percentage is based on a combination of factors, including historical loss experience, current delinquency and default trends, collateral values, and both general economic and specific industry trends. For non-homogeneous portfolios, including the

golf mortgage and timeshare product lines, the allowance is established as a percentage of watchlist balances, as defined on page 11, which represents a combination of assumed default likelihood and loss severity based on historical experience, industry trends and collateral values. In establishing our allowance for losses to cover accounts not specifically identified, the most critical factors for the aviation product line include the collateral value of the portfolio, historical default experience and delinquency trends; for golf equipment, factors considered include historical loss experience and delinquency trends; and for golf mortgage, factors include an evaluation of individual loan credit quality indicators such as delinquency, loan balance to collateral value, debt service coverage, existence and financial strength of guarantors, historical progression from watchlist to nonaccrual status and historical loss severity. For the timeshare product line, we evaluate individual loan credit quality indicators such as borrowing base shortfalls for revolving notes receivable facilities, default rates of our notes receivable collateral, borrower’s access to capital, historical progression from watchlist to nonaccrual status and estimates of loss severity based on analysis of impaired loans in the product line.

Finance receivables held for investment are written down to the fair value (less estimated costs to sell) of the related collateral at the earlier of the date when the collateral is repossessed or when no payment has been received for six months unless management deems the receivable collectable. Finance receivables are charged off when the remaining balance is deemed to be uncollectable.

A rollforward of the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment and a summary of its composition, based on how the underlying finance receivables are evaluated for impairment, is presented below. The finance receivables reported in the following table specifically exclude $279 million and $283 million of leveraged leases at April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively, in accordance with authoritative accounting standards.

(In millions)	Aviation			Golf Equipment			Golf Mortgage			Timeshare			Structured Capital and Other Liquidating			Total
For the three months ended April 2, 2011
Allowance for losses
Beginning balance	$	107		$	16		$	79		$	106		$	34		$	342
Provision for losses		11			—			(1	)		—			2			12
Net charge-offs and transfers		(8	)		(3	)		(3	)		(1	)		(1	)		(16	)
Ending balance	$	110		$	13		$	75		$	105		$	35		$	338
Ending balance based on individual evaluations		50			1			45			102			4			202
Ending balance based on collective evaluation		60			12			30			3			31			136
Finance receivables
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	164		$	6		$	299		$	368		$	38		$	875
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,864			186			341			195			164			2,750
Balance at end of period	$	2,028		$	192		$	640		$	563		$	202		$	3,625
For the three months ended April 3, 2010
Allowance for losses
Beginning balance	$	114		$	9		$	65		$	79		$	74		$	341
Provision for losses		13			4			14			15			9			55
Net charge-offs and transfers		(10	)		(2	)		(11	)		—			(8	)		(31	)
Ending balance	$	117		$	11		$	68		$	94		$	75		$	365
Ending balance based on individual evaluations		52			1			43			77			1			174
Ending balance based on collective evaluation		65			10			25			17			74			191
Finance receivables
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	232		$	6		$	343		$	434		$	104		$	1,119
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,171			169			502			768			553			4,163
Balance at end of period	$	2,403		$	175		$	845		$	1,202		$	657		$	5,282

Note 8: Inventories

(In millions)	April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
Finished goods	$	922		$	784
Work in process		2,261			2,125
Raw materials		456			506
		3,639			3,415
Progress/milestone payments		(1,186	)		(1,138	)
	$	2,453		$	2,277

Note 9: Debt

On May 5, 2009, we issued $600 million of 4.5% Convertible Notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2013 and concurrently purchased call options to acquire our common stock and sold warrants to purchase our common stock for the purpose of reducing the potential dilutive effect to our shareholders and/or our cash outflow upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes. For more information on these transactions, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Textron’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ended March 31, 2011, our common stock price exceeded the $17.06 per share conversion threshold price set forth for these Convertible Notes. Accordingly, the notes are convertible at the holder’s option through June 30, 2011. We may deliver shares of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock in satisfaction of our obligations upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. We intend to settle the face value of the Convertible Notes in cash. Based on an April 2, 2011 stock price of $27.40, the "if converted value" exceeds the face amount of the notes by $652.6 million; however, after giving effect to the exercise of the call options and warrants, the incremental cash or share settlement in excess of the face amount would result in either a 19 million net share issuance or a cash payment of $532.6 million, or a combination of cash and stock, at our option. We have continued to classify these Convertible Notes as long-term based on our intent and ability to maintain the debt outstanding for at least one year through the use of various funding sources available to us.

Note 10: Accrued Liabilities

We provide limited warranty and product maintenance programs, including parts and labor, for certain products for periods ranging from one to five years. Changes in our warranty and product maintenance liabilities are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Accrual at the beginning of period	$	242		$	263
Provision		57			38
Settlements		(64	)		(58	)
Adjustments to prior accrual estimates		(6	)		(3	)
Accrual at the end of period	$	229		$	240

Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies

We are subject to legal proceedings and other claims arising out of the conduct of our business, including proceedings and claims relating to commercial and financial transactions; government contracts; compliance with applicable laws and regulations; production partners; product liability; employment; and environmental, safety and health matters. Some of these legal proceedings and claims seek damages, fines or penalties in substantial amounts or remediation of environmental contamination. As a government contractor, we are subject to audits, reviews and investigations to determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. Under federal government procurement regulations, certain claims brought by the U.S. Government could result in our being suspended or debarred from U.S. Government contracting for a period of time. On the basis of information presently available, we do not believe that existing proceedings and claims will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 12. Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

We measure fair value at the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We prioritize the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability into a three-tier fair value hierarchy. This fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exist, requiring companies to develop their own assumptions. Observable inputs that do not meet the criteria of Level 1 and include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active are categorized as Level 2. Level 3 inputs are those that reflect our estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs may include methodologies such as the market approach, the income approach or the cost approach and may use unobservable inputs such as projections, estimates and management’s interpretation of current market data. These unobservable inputs are utilized only to the extent that observable inputs are not available or cost-effective to obtain.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist primarily of our derivative financial instruments, which are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The notional and fair value amounts of these instruments that are designated as hedging instruments are provided below:

		Notional Amount				Asset (Liability)
(In millions)	Borrowing Group	April 2, 2011		January 1, 2011		April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
Assets
Interest rate exchange contracts*	Finance	$	473	$	628	$	28		$	34
Investment in other marketable securities	Finance		26		51		26			51
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Manufacturing		655		534		43			39
Total		$	1,154	$	1,213	$	97		$	124
Liabilities
Interest rate exchange contracts*	Finance	$	469	$	451	$	(3	)	$	(6	)
Foreign currency exchange contracts	Manufacturing		86		101		(2	)		(2	)
Total		$	555	$	552	$	(5	)	$	(8	)

*Interest rate exchange contracts represent fair value hedges.

The fair values of derivative instruments for the Manufacturing group are included in either other current assets or accrued liabilities in our balance sheet. For the Finance group, these instruments are included in either other assets or other liabilities.

The Finance group’s interest rate exchange contracts are not exchange traded and are measured at fair value utilizing widely accepted, third-party developed valuation models. The actual terms of each individual contract are entered into a valuation model, along with interest rate and foreign exchange rate data, which is based on readily observable market data published by third-party leading financial news and data providers. Credit risk is factored into the fair value of these assets and liabilities based on the differential between both our credit default swap spread for liabilities and the counterparty’s credit default swap spread for assets as compared with a standard AA-rated counterparty; however, this had no significant impact on the valuation at April 2, 2011.

Foreign currency exchange contracts are measured at fair value using the market method valuation technique. The inputs to this technique utilize current foreign currency exchange forward market rates published by third-party leading financial news and data providers. These are observable data that represent the rates that the financial institution uses for contracts entered into at that date; however, they are not based on actual transactions so they are classified as Level 2.

Investments in other marketable securities represent investments in notes issued by securitization trusts that purchase timeshare notes receivables from timeshare developers and are classified as available for sale. Fair value for these notes was determined based on bids received from prospective purchasers and observable market inputs for similar securitization interests in markets that are relatively inactive compared with the market environment in which they were originally issued.

Fair Value Hedges

Our Finance group enters into interest rate exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of its fixed-rate receivables and debt due to fluctuations in interest rates. By using these contracts, we are able to convert our fixed-rate cash flows to floating-rate cash flows. The amount of ineffectiveness on our fair value hedges and the gain (loss) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were both insignificant in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010.

Cash Flow Hedges

We manufacture and sell our products in a number of countries throughout the world, and, therefore, we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The primary purpose of our foreign currency hedging activities is to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases of materials, foreign currency sales of products, and other assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. We primarily utilize forward exchange contracts and purchased options with maturities of no more than 18 months that qualify as cash flow hedges. These are intended to offset the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted sales, inventory purchases and overhead expenses. At April 2, 2011, we had a net deferred gain of $29 million in OCI related to these cash flow hedges. As the underlying transactions occur, we expect to reclassify $15 million of after-tax gains into earnings in the next 12 months and $14 million of after-tax gains into earnings in the following 12-month period.

We hedge our net investment position in major currencies and generate foreign currency interest payments that offset other transactional exposures in these currencies. To accomplish this, we borrow directly in foreign currency and designate a portion of foreign currency debt as a hedge of net investments. We also may utilize currency forwards as hedges of our related foreign net investments. We record changes in the fair value of these contracts in other comprehensive income to the extent they are effective as cash flow hedges. If a contract does not qualify for hedge accounting or is designated as a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the contract are recorded in earnings. Currency effects on the effective portion of these hedges, which are reflected in the cumulative translation adjustment account within OCI, produced a $24 million after-tax gain in the first quarter of 2011, resulting in an accumulated net gain balance of $38 million at April 2, 2011. The ineffective portion of these hedges was insignificant.

Activity within accumulated other comprehensive loss and OCI related to the Manufacturing group’s foreign currency exchange contracts is provided in the following table:

		Three Months Ended
(In millions)	Gain (Loss) Location	April 2, 2011		April 3, 2010
Amount of gain recognized in OCI		$	6	$	6
Effective portion of derivative reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income	Cost of sales		4		3

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The table below presents those assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that had fair value measurement adjustments during the first quarter of 2011 and 2010. These assets were measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and include the following:

					Gain (Loss)
	Balance at				Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011		April 3, 2010		April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Finance group
Impaired finance receivables	$	508	$	510	$	(33	)	$	(46	)
Finance receivables held for sale		237		598		(11	)		(10	)
Other assets		54		67		(6	)		(18	)

Impaired Finance Receivables — Impaired nonaccrual finance receivables are included in the table above since the measurement of required reserves on our impaired finance receivables is significantly dependent on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Fair values of collateral are determined based on the use of appraisals, industry pricing guides, input from market participants, our recent experience selling similar assets or internally developed discounted cash flow models. Fair value measurements recorded on impaired finance receivables resulted in charges to provision for loan losses and primarily were related to initial fair value adjustments.

Finance Receivables Held for Sale — Finance receivables held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. As a result of our plan to exit the non-captive Finance business certain finance receivables are classified as held for sale. At April 2, 2011, the finance receivables held for sale are primarily assets in the golf mortgage and timeshare product lines. Timeshare finance receivables classified as held for sale were identified at the individual loan level; whereas the majority of golf course mortgages were identified as a portion of a larger portfolio with common characteristics based on the intention to balance the sale of certain loans with the collection of others to maximize economic value. In the first quarter of 2011, certain golf course mortgages were identified at the individual loan level as a result of their inclusion in a portfolio sale subsequent to the end of the quarter. These finance receivables are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during periods in which the fair value is lower than the cost value.

There are no active, quoted market prices for our finance receivables. The estimate of fair value was determined based on the use of discounted cash flow models to estimate the exit price we expect to receive in the principal market for each type of loan in an orderly transaction, which includes both the sale of pools of similar assets and the sale of individual loans. The models we used incorporate estimates of the rate of return, financing cost, capital structure and/or discount rate expectations of current market participants combined with estimated loan cash flows based on credit losses, payment rates and credit line utilization rates. Where available, assumptions related to the expectations of current market participants are compared with observable market inputs, including bids from prospective purchasers of similar loans and certain bond market indices for loans perceived to be of similar credit quality. Although we utilize and prioritize these market observable inputs in our discounted cash flow models, these inputs are not typically derived from markets with directly comparable loan structures, industries and collateral types. Therefore, all valuations of finance receivables held for sale involve significant management judgment, which can result in differences between our fair value estimates and those of other market participants.

Other assets — Other assets include repossessed assets and properties, operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables and other investments, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and have no active, quoted market prices. The fair value of these assets is determined based on the use of appraisals, industry pricing guides, input from market participants, our recent experience selling similar assets or internally developed discounted cash flow models. For our other investments, the discounted cash flow models incorporate assumptions specific to the nature of the investments’ business and underlying assets and include industry valuation benchmarks such as discount rates, capitalization rates and cash flow multiples.

Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value

The carrying value and estimated fair values of our financial instruments that are not reflected in the financial statements at fair value are as follows:

	April 2, 2011						January 1, 2011
(In millions)	Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value			Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value
Manufacturing group
Long-term debt, excluding leases	$	(2,211	)	$	(2,892	)	$	(2,172	)	$	(2,698	)
Finance group
Finance receivables held for investment, excluding leases		3,052			2,875			3,345			3,131
Debt		(3,152	)		(3,070	)		(3,660	)		(3,528	)

Fair value for the Manufacturing group debt is determined using market observable data for similar transactions. At April 2, 2011 and January 2, 2010, approximately 35% and 33%, respectively, of the fair value of term debt for the Finance group was determined based on observable market transactions. The remaining Finance group debt was determined based on discounted cash flow analyses using observable market inputs from debt with similar duration, subordination and credit default expectations. We utilize the same valuation methodologies to determine the fair value estimates for finance receivables held for investment as used for finance receivables held for sale.

Note 13: Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense for continuing operations of $15 million for both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 equated to an effective income tax rate of 32.6% and 136.4%, respectively. The decrease in the rate was primarily attributable to the write-off of an $11 million deferred tax asset related to a change in the tax treatment of the Medicare Part D program due to U.S. health-care law enacted in the first quarter of 2010 which equated to an effective income tax rate impact of 98.2%.

Note 14: Segment Information

We operate in, and report financial information for, the following five business segments: Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial and Finance. Segment profit is an important measure used for evaluating performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit for the manufacturing segments excludes interest expense, certain corporate expenses and special charges. The measurement for the Finance segment excludes special charges and includes interest income and expense, along with intercompany interest expense. Provisions for losses on finance receivables involving the sale or lease of our products are recorded by the selling manufacturing division when our Finance group has recourse to the Manufacturing group.

Our revenues by segment and a reconciliation of segment profit to income from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
REVENUES
Manufacturing Group
Cessna	$	556		$	433
Bell		749			618
Textron Systems		445			458
Industrial		703			625
		2,453			2,134
Finance Group		26			76
Total revenues	$	2,479		$	2,210
SEGMENT OPERATING PROFIT
Manufacturing Group
Cessna	$	(38	)	$	(24	)
Bell		91			74
Textron Systems		53			55
Industrial		61			49
		167			154
Finance Group		(44	)		(58	)
Segment profit		123			96
Special charges		—			(12	)
Corporate expenses and other, net		(39	)		(37	)
Interest expense, net for Manufacturing group		(38	)		(36	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	46		$	11

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Results of Operations

Revenues

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Revenues	$	2,479		$	2,210
% change compared with prior period		12	%

Revenues increased $269 million, 12%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010. This increase was due to revenue increases in the Bell, Cessna and Industrial segments that were partially offset by lower revenue in the Finance and Textron Systems segments. The net revenue increase included the following factors:

·	Higher revenues of $131 million in the Bell segment, largely due to higher volume in the V-22 program;

·	An increase in Cessna’s revenue of $123 million, primarily due to the mix of light- and mid-size Citation business jets sold during the quarter; and

·	Higher Industrial segment revenues of $78 million, largely due to higher volume reflecting improvements in the automotive industry;

·	Partially offset by lower revenues at the Finance segment of $50 million, primarily attributable to the lower average finance receivable portfolio balance resulting from the continued liquidation; and

·	A decrease in Textron Systems’ revenue of $13 million, largely due to lower aftermarket volume in the Land and Marine Systems product line.

Cost of Sales and Gross Margin

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Cost of sales	$	2,055		$	1,776
% change compared with prior period		16	%
Gross margin percentage of Manufacturing revenues		16.2	%		16.8	%

On a dollar basis, cost of sales increased $279 million, 16%, in 2011, largely due to the higher sales volumes. Cost of sales as a percentage of Manufacturing revenues was 83.8% in the first quarter of 2011 and 83.2% in the first quarter of 2010, primarily due to $17 million in higher research and development costs at Cessna and Bell in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010.

Selling and Administrative Expense

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Selling and administrative expenses	$	304		$	285
% change compared with prior period		7	%

Selling and administrative expense increased $19 million, 7%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, with a $29 million increase related to the Manufacturing businesses and Corporate, largely related to the impact of stock appreciation on compensation expense of $10 million and higher marketing, bid and proposal costs. This increase was partially offset by $10 million of lower expenses at the Finance segment reflecting lower compensation expense associated with a workforce reduction in the non-captive business.

Interest Expense

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Interest expense	$	62		$	71
% change compared with prior period		(13	)%

Interest expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations includes interest for both the Finance and Manufacturing borrowing groups with interest related to intercompany borrowings eliminated. Our consolidated interest expense decreased $9 million, 13%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to a $6 million decrease for the Finance group, largely due to the reduction in its debt as it liquidates the non-captive commercial finance business.

Special Charges

Special charges of $12 million in the first quarter of 2010 represent restructuring costs incurred under the program that was completed at the end of 2010 and primarily represent severance costs. There were no special charges in the first quarter of 2011.

Backlog

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011		January 1, 2011
Bell	$	7,318	$	7,199
Cessna		2,635		2,928
Textron Systems		1,610		1,598

Backlog at Bell increased $119 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily reflecting higher commercial aircraft orders in excess of deliveries, partially offset by higher deliveries related to the V-22 and H-1 programs. Backlog declined $293 million at Cessna primarily reflecting deliveries in excess of orders.

Segment Analysis

Segment profit is an important measure used to evaluate performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit for the manufacturing segments excludes interest expense, certain corporate expenses and special charges. The measurement for the Finance segment excludes special charges and includes interest income and expense, along with intercompany interest expense.

Cessna

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010			% Change
Revenues	$	556		$	433			28	%
Operating expenses		594			457			30	%
Segment loss		(38	)		(24	)		(58	)%
Profit margin		(7	)%		(6	)%

Cessna Revenues and Operating Expenses

The following factors contributed to the change in revenue from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume and mix	$	124
Other		(1	)
Total change	$	123

In the first quarter of 2011, Cessna’s revenues increased $123 million, 28%, compared with the corresponding period of

2010, primarily due to the mix of light- and mid-size Citation business jets sold during the quarter. We delivered 31 Citation business jets in both the first quarter of 2011 and 2010.

Operating expenses increased by $137 million, 30%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, largely due to a change in product mix with more higher-cost business jets sold in the quarter. In addition, operating expenses were negatively impacted by lower forfeited deposits of $9 million and higher engineering and development expenses of $9 million, primarily due to new product development.

Cessna Segment Loss

The following factors contributed to the change in segment loss from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume and mix	$	17
Inflation, net of pricing		(4	)
Performance		(27	)
Total change	$	(14	)

Cessna’s segment loss increased $14 million, 58%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to unfavorable performance of $27 million and inflation in excess of pricing of $4 million. The unfavorable performance included lower forfeited deposits of $9 million, as well as higher engineering and development expenses of $9 million, primarily due to new product development. These factors were partially offset by a $17 million favorable impact from mix and volume, primarily related to business jet mix.

Bell

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010			% Change
Revenues:
V-22 program	$	358		$	210			70	%
Other military		170			198			(14	)%
Commercial		221			210			5	%
Total revenues		749			618			21	%
Operating expenses		658			544			21	%
Segment profit		91			74			23	%
Profit margin		12	%		12	%

Bell manufactures helicopters, tiltrotor aircraft, and related spare parts and provides services for military and/or commercial markets. Bell’s major U.S. Government programs at this time are the V-22 tiltrotor aircraft and the H-1 helicopter platforms, which are both in the production stage and represent a significant portion of Bell’s revenues from the U.S. Government. During 2011, we continued to ramp up production and deliveries to meet customer schedule requirements for these programs.

Bell Revenues and Operating Expenses

The following factors contributed to the change in revenue from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume	$	124
Other		7
Total change	$	131

Bell’s revenues increased $131 million, 21%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, with volume representing 95% of the increase. Bell’s V-22 program revenues increased $148 million, 70%, in the first quarter of 2011 primarily reflecting higher aircraft deliveries. We delivered 9 V-22 aircraft during the first quarter of 2011, compared with 4 deliveries in the first quarter of 2010. Other military revenues decreased $28 million, 14%, in 2011 largely due to a $20 million decrease in aftermarket volume reflecting the completion of several non-recurring programs in 2010, along with timing of deliveries for other programs, partially offset by higher deliveries of H-1 aircraft. We delivered 4 H-1 aircraft in the first quarter of 2011, compared with 3 deliveries in the first quarter of 2010. Commercial revenues increased $11 million, primarily due to higher aftermarket volume. Bell delivered 15 commercial aircraft in the quarter, flat with deliveries in the first quarter of 2010.

Bell’s operating expenses increased $114 million, 21%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher net sales volume. In addition, research and development costs increased $8 million in 2011 related to new product development.

Bell Segment Profit

The following factors contributed to the change in segment profit from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume and mix	$	4
Pricing, net of inflation		3
Performance		10
Total change	$	17

Bell’s segment profit increased $17 million, 23%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to improved performance, largely attributable to efficiencies achieved from higher production volume. Bell’s improved performance included $19 million related to the V-22 and H-1 programs, reflecting the impact from efficiencies realized in connection with the ramp-up of production lines and lower overhead and material costs, partially offset by higher research and development costs of $8 million.

Textron Systems

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010			% Change
Revenues	$	445		$	458			(3	)%
Operating expenses		392			403			(3	)%
Segment profit		53			55			(4	)%
Profit margin		12	%		12	%

Textron Systems Revenues and Operating Expenses

The following factors contributed to the change in revenue from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume	$	(16	)
Other		3
Total change	$	(13	)

Revenues at Textron Systems decreased $13 million, 3%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to a $12 million decrease in our Land and Marine Systems product line, largely due to lower armored security vehicle aftermarket volumes.

Textron System’s operating expenses decreased $11 million, 3%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to lower net sales volume.

Textron Systems Segment Profit

The following factors contributed to the change in segment profit from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume and mix	$	(5	)
Other		3
Total change	$	(2	)

Segment profit at Textron Systems decreased $2 million, 4%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the impact of lower volume and mix.

Industrial

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010			% Change
Revenues:
Fuel systems and functional components	$	471		$	406			16	%
Other industrial		232			219			6	%
Total revenues		703			625			12	%
Operating expenses		642			576			11	%
Segment profit		61			49			24	%
Profit margin		9	%		8	%

Industrial Revenues and Operating Expenses

The following factors contributed to the change in revenue from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume	$	63
Foreign exchange		7
Other		8
Total change	$	78

Revenues at the Industrial segment increased $78 million, 12%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010. Fuel systems and functional components revenue increased 16% in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to higher volume of $59 million reflecting improvements in the automotive industry and a favorable foreign exchange impact of $8 million, largely due to fluctuations with the euro. Other industrial revenues also increased primarily due to higher volume in the powered tools, testing and measurement equipment product line.

The Industrial segment’s operating expenses increased $66 million, 11%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the cost of sales associated with the higher sales volumes and inflation, largely reflecting higher material and labor costs.

Industrial Segment Profit

The following factors contributed to the change in segment profit from the prior year quarter:

(In millions)	2011 versus 2010
Volume	$	16
Inflation, net of pricing		(11	)
Performance		6
Other		1
Total change	$	12

Segment profit for the Industrial segment increased $12 million, 24%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to a $16 million impact from higher volume. Inflation in excess of pricing largely reflects higher material costs in all of the industrial businesses and higher labor cost in our fuel systems and functional components business. The improved cost performance largely reflects the timing of recoveries from customers related to engineering costs incurred in our fuel systems and functional components business.

Finance

	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010			% Change
Revenues	$	26		$	76			(66	)%
Segment loss		(44	)		(58	)		24	%

Our plan to exit the non-captive commercial finance business in our Finance segment is being effected through a combination of orderly liquidation and selected sales of the remaining non-captive finance receivables. The exit plan is expected to be substantially complete over the next three to five years.

Finance Revenues

Finance segment revenues decreased $50 million, 66%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the following factors:

·	$31 million attributable to the lower average finance receivable portfolio balance of $2.2 billion;

·	$9 million in higher portfolio losses, net of gains; and

·	$7 million of lower accretion of valuation allowance.

Portfolio losses, net of gains increased primarily as a result of a $13 million gain on the sale of a distribution finance receivable portfolio in the first quarter of 2010 and higher portfolio losses in the timeshare portfolio in the first quarter of 2011, primarily the result of an early payoff of one significant notes receivable loan, partially offset by lower impairment charges in the structured capital portfolio.

Finance Segment Loss

Finance segment loss decreased $14 million, 24%, in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010, primarily due to the following factors:

·	$43 million in lower provision for loan losses, primarily the result of a decline in the accounts identified as nonaccrual during the quarter as compared to last year; and

·	$10 million in lower operating and administrative expenses, primarily due to lower compensation expense associated with a workforce reduction in the non-captive business;

·	Partially offset by a $20 million reduction in interest margin resulting from the lower average finance receivable portfolio balance of $2.2 billion;

·	$9 million in higher portfolio losses, net of gains; and

·	$7 million of lower accretion of valuation allowance.

Finance Portfolio Quality

The following table reflects information about the Finance segment’s credit performance related to finance receivables held for investment. Finance receivables held for sale are reflected at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result, finance receivables held for sale are not included in the credit performance statistics below.

(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
Finance receivables held for investment	$	3,904		$	4,213
Nonaccrual finance receivables	$	836		$	850
Allowance for losses	$	338		$	342
Ratio of nonaccrual finance receivables to finance receivables held for investment		21.40	%		20.17	%
Ratio of allowance for losses on impaired nonaccrual finance receivables to impaired nonaccrual finance receivables		25.55	%		23.82	%
Ratio of allowance for losses on finance receivables to nonaccrual finance receivables held for investment		40.41	%		40.30	%
Ratio of allowance for losses on finance receivables to finance receivables held for investment		8.65	%		8.13	%
60+ days contractual delinquency as a percentage of finance receivables		10.71	%		9.77	%
60+ days contractual delinquency	$	418		$	411
Repossessed assets and properties	$	147		$	157
Operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables	$	100		$	107

At April 2, 2011, finance receivables held for investment included $1.7 billion of non-captive finance receivables, compared with $1.9 billion at the end of 2010. In addition, finance receivables held for sale by the non-captive business totaled $237 million at April 2, 2011, compared with $413 million at the end of 2010.

We believe that the percentage of nonaccrual finance receivables generally will remain high as we execute our non-captive liquidation plan. The liquidation plan is also likely to result in a slower rate of liquidation for nonaccrual finance receivables. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information on the nonaccrual finance receivables by product line, along with a summary of finance receivables held for investment based on our internally assigned credit quality indicators.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our financings are conducted through two separate borrowing groups. The Manufacturing group consists of Textron Inc. consolidated with its majority-owned subsidiaries that operate in the Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments. The Finance group, which also is the Finance segment, consists of TFC, its consolidated subsidiaries and three other finance subsidiaries owned by Textron Inc. We designed this framework to enhance our borrowing power by separating the Finance group. Our Manufacturing group operations include the development, production and delivery of tangible goods and services, while our Finance group provides financial services. Due to the fundamental differences between each borrowing group’s activities, investors, rating agencies and analysts use different measures to evaluate each group’s performance. To support those evaluations, we present balance sheet and cash flow information for each borrowing group within the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Key information that is utilized in assessing our liquidity is summarized below:

(Dollars in millions)	April 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
Manufacturing group
Cash and equivalents	$	986		$	898
Debt		2,549			2,302
Shareholders’ equity		3,052			2,972
Capital (debt plus shareholders’ equity)		5,601			5,274
Net debt (net of cash and equivalents) to capital		33.9	%		32.1	%
Debt to capital		45.5	%		43.6	%
Finance group
Cash and equivalents	$	36		$	33
Debt		3,152			3,660

We believe that our calculations of debt to capital and net debt to capital are useful measures as they provide a summary indication of the level of debt financing (i.e., leverage) that is in place to support our capital structure, as well as to provide an indication of the capacity to add further leverage. We believe that with our existing cash balances, coupled with the continued successful execution of the exit plan for the non-captive portion of the commercial finance business, and cash we expect to generate from our manufacturing operations, we will have sufficient cash to meet our future needs.

We maintain an effective shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that allows us to issue an unlimited amount of public debt and other securities.

On March 23, 2011, Textron Inc. entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. This facility agreement expires in March 2015 and replaces the $1.25 billion 5-year facility that was scheduled to expire in April 2012. TFC also has a credit facility that expires in April 2012. During the first quarter of 2011, the borrowing capacity of TFC’s facility was reduced to an aggregate principal amount of $1.45 billion. At April 2, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under the Textron Inc. facility and $1.2 billion outstanding under TFC’s facility.

In the first quarter of 2011, we liquidated $485 million of the Finance group’s finance receivables, net of originations. These finance receivable reductions occurred in both the non-captive and captive finance portfolios but were primarily driven by the non-captive portfolio in connection with our exit plan, including $272 million in the timeshare product line. These reductions resulted from the combination of scheduled finance receivable collections, sales, discounted payoffs, repossession of collateral, charge-offs and impairment charges recorded as portfolio losses, net of gains in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. At April 2, 2011, $1.9 billion of finance receivables remained in the non-captive portfolio.

In 2009, we issued $600 million of 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2013 as discussed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ended March 31, 2011, our common stock price exceeded the $17.06 per share conversion threshold price set forth for these Convertible Notes. Accordingly, the notes are convertible at the holder’s option through June 30, 2011. We may deliver shares of

common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of common stock in satisfaction of our obligations upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. We intend to settle the face value of the Convertible Notes in cash. We have continued to classify these Convertible Notes as long term based on our intent and ability to maintain the debt outstanding for at least one year through the use of various funding sources available to us.

Manufacturing Group Cash Flows

Cash flows from continuing operations for the Manufacturing group as presented in our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are summarized below:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Operating activities	$	73		$	(66	)
Investing activities		(121	)		(75	)
Financing activities		129			(166	)

Cash flow from operating activities improved in the first quarter of 2011, compared with the corresponding period of 2010 primarily due to higher earnings for the Manufacturing group, adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization. Cash used for restructuring activities totaled $22 million and $16 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

We used more cash for investing activities largely due to higher capital expenditures, which totaled $78 million and $38 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In the first quarter of 2011, we began to issue commercial paper again for our short-term financing needs, ending the quarter with $203 million of outstanding borrowings. We also loaned $60 million to the Finance group in the first quarter of 2011, compared with $150 million in the first quarter of 2010.

Capital Contributions Paid To and Dividends Received From TFC

Under a Support Agreement between Textron Inc. and TFC, Textron Inc. is required to maintain a controlling interest in TFC. The agreement also requires Textron Inc. to ensure that TFC maintains fixed charge coverage of no less than 125% and consolidated shareholder’s equity of no less than $200 million. Cash contributions paid to TFC to maintain compliance with the Support Agreement and dividends paid by TFC to Textron Inc. are detailed below:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Dividends paid by TFC to Textron Inc.	$	130		$	125
Capital contributions paid to TFC under Support Agreement		(63	)		(75	)

An additional cash contribution of $49 million was paid to TFC on April 11, 2011 as required by the Support Agreement.

Due to the nature of these contributions, we classify these contributions within cash flows used by operating activities for the Manufacturing group in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Capital contributions to support Finance group growth in the ongoing captive finance business are classified as cash flows from financing activities. The Finance group’s net income (loss) is excluded from the Manufacturing group’s cash flows, while dividends from the Finance group are included within cash flows from operating activities for the Manufacturing group as they represent a return on investment.

Finance Group Cash Flows

The cash flows from continuing operations for the Finance group are summarized below:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Operating activities	$	(29	)	$	(50	)
Investing activities		513			771
Financing activities		(482	)		(785	)

The Finance group used less cash for operating activities largely due to a $51 million payment made to the Manufacturing group in the first quarter of 2010 under the tax sharing agreement for which there were less than $1 million in tax payments

in the first quarter of 2011. This was partially offset by lower earnings for the Finance group after adjusting for non-cash items such as provision for losses on finance receivables.

Cash receipts from the collection of finance receivables continued to outpace finance receivable originations, which resulted in net cash inflow from investing activities in both quarters. Finance receivables repaid and proceeds from sales totaled $579 million and $937 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, while cash outflows for originations declined to $125 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $226 million in the first quarter of 2010. These decreases were largely driven by the wind down of the non-captive finance receivable portfolio.

In the first quarter of 2011, TFC made a discretionary payment of $250 million against the outstanding balance on its bank line of credit; however, cash used for financing activities was lower in 2011 primarily due to $410 million in long-term debt repayments in the first quarter of 2011, compared with $925 million in the first quarter of 2010. In addition, the Finance group received $144 million in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt in the first quarter of 2011, compared with $20 million in the first quarter of 2010.

TFC borrowed $60 million and $150 million from Textron Inc. with interest in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, to pay down maturing debt. As of April 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the outstanding balance due to Textron Inc. for these borrowings was $375 million and $315 million, respectively.

Consolidated Cash Flows

The consolidated cash flows from continuing operations, after elimination of activity between the borrowing groups, are summarized below:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011			April 3, 2010
Operating activities	$	55		$	(89	)
Investing activities		355			639
Financing activities		(327	)		(921	)

Cash receipts from the collection of finance receivables continued to outpace finance receivable originations, which resulted in net cash inflow from investing activities in both quarters. Finance receivables repaid and proceeds from sales totaled $458 million and $778 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, while cash outflows for originations declined to $76 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $145 million in the first quarter of 2010. These decreases were largely driven by the wind down of the non-captive finance receivable portfolio. We also had higher capital expenditures of $78 million and $38 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

In the first quarter of 2011, we began to issue commercial paper again for our short-term financing needs, ending the quarter with $203 million of outstanding borrowings. The net proceeds from these borrowings were more than offset by a $250 million discretionary payment made by TFC against the outstanding balance on its bank line of credit. Total cash used for financing activities was lower in 2011 primarily due to lower repayments of long-term debt of $417 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared with $936 million in the first quarter of 2010. In addition, we received proceeds of $144 million in the first quarter of 2011 from the issuance of debt, compared with $20 million in the first quarter of 2010.

Captive Financing and Other Intercompany Transactions

The Finance group finances retail purchases and leases for new and used aircraft and equipment in support of our Manufacturing group, otherwise known as captive financing. In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash received from customers or from securitizations is reflected as operating activities when received from third parties. However, in the cash flow information provided for the separate borrowing groups, cash flows related to captive financing activities are reflected based on the operations of each group. For example, when product is sold by our Manufacturing group to a customer and is financed by the Finance group, the origination of the finance receivable is recorded within investing activities as a cash outflow in the Finance group’s statement of cash flows. Meanwhile, in the Manufacturing group’s statement of cash flows, the cash received from the Finance group on the customer’s behalf is recorded within operating cash flows as a cash inflow. Although cash is transferred between the two borrowing groups, there is no cash transaction reported in the consolidated cash flows at the time of the original financing. These captive financing activities, along with all significant intercompany transactions, are reclassified or eliminated from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Reclassification and elimination adjustments included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are summarized below:

	Three Months Ended
(In millions)	April 2, 2011				April 3, 2010
Reclassifications from investing activities:
Finance receivable originations for Manufacturing group inventory sales		$	(49	)	$	(81	)
Cash received from customers and sale of receivables			121			159
Other capital contributions made to Finance group			(40	)		(20	)
Other			5			(1	)
Total reclassifications from investing activities			37			57
Reclassifications from financing activities:
Capital contribution paid by Manufacturing group to Finance group under Support Agreement			63			75
Dividends received by Manufacturing group from Finance group			(130	)		(125	)
Other capital contributions made to Finance group			40			20
Other			1			—
Total reclassifications from financing activities			(26	)		(30	)
Total reclassifications and adjustments to cash flow from operating activities		$	11		$	27

Item 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has been no significant change in our exposure to market risk during the three months ended April 2, 2011. For discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk contained in Textron’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act)) as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that (a) the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (b) such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended April 2, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

(a)

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Textron Inc. was held on April 27, 2011 in Providence, Rhode Island. Of the 276,158,767 shares outstanding as of the record date, 240,389,315 shares (approximately 87%) were present or represented by proxy at the meeting.

The results of the voting on the matters submitted to the shareholders are as follows:

The following persons were elected to serve as directors until the next annual shareholders’ meeting and received the votes listed:

	For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Vote
James T. Conway	204,515,287	5,944,022	3,896,211	26,033,795
Paul E. Gagné	195,314,749	15,101,512	3,939,259	26,033,795
Dain M. Hancock	203,499,840	6,831,360	4,024,319	26,033,796
Lloyd G. Trotter	197,299,657	12,969,982	4,085,882	26,033,794

The following directors have terms of office which continued after the meeting: Class I expiring in 2012: Scott C. Donnelly, Lawrence K. Fish and Joe T. Ford and Class II expiring in 2013: Kathleen M. Bader, R. Kerry Clark, Ivor J. Evans, Lord Powell of Bayswater KCMG and James L. Ziemer.

The advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in our proxy statement, was approved by the following vote:

	For		Against		Abstain		Broker Non-Vote
	173,787,999		33,876,953		5,431,267		27,293,096

The advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation received the following votes:

	One Year		Two Years		Three Years		Abstain		Broker Non-Vote
	187,994,457		1,922,661		18,957,282		5,219,891		26,295,024

In light of these results, and consistent with the Board’s recommendation, the Board has determined that Textron will include a shareholder vote on the compensation of its named executive officers in its proxy materials annually until the next required vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on the compensation of executives.

The amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to provide a right for holders that have owned continuously for a period of at least one year not less than 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting of shareholders was approved by the following vote:

	For		Against		Abstain		Broker Non-Vote
	231,261,185		4,908,867		3,221,377		0

Also, the amendment to Section 2.03 of our Amended and Restated By-Laws, which was approved by the Board of Directors contingent upon shareholder approval of the special meeting amendment, has become effective; this amendment revises the By-Laws to establish procedures by which 25% shareholders may require our Corporate Secretary to call a special meeting. In addition, the By-Law amendment imposes certain procedural requirements on shareholders requesting such a meeting (including the provision of the same information required for shareholder proposals at annual meetings under our advance notice by-law provisions) and imposes qualifications designed to prevent duplicative and unnecessary meetings by eliminating proposals that:

are not proper subjects for shareholder action under, or involve a violation of, applicable law;

are received during the period beginning 90 days prior to the anniversary of the prior annual meeting of shareholders and ending on the date of the next annual meeting of shareholders;

are substantially similar to another item, other than the election of directors, that was presented at a meeting of shareholders held within the prior 12 months, as determined in good faith by the Board; or

are substantially similar to another item that is included in our notice as an item of business to be brought before a shareholder meeting that has been called but not yet held or that is called for a date within 90 days of the receipt of the request, as determined in good faith by the Board.

The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP by the Audit Committee as Textron's independent registered public accounting firm for 2011 was ratified by the following vote:

	For		Against		Abstain		Broker Non-Vote
	233,624,826		2,438,471		3,328,128		0

(b)

On April 25, 2011, we entered into a Hangar License and Services Agreement with our Chief Executive Officer's limited liability company under which Mr. Donnelly's LLC subleases a portion of Textron’s leased hangar space for his personal airplane and may obtain certain aircraft maintenance and other services from Textron for his aircraft. Fees for hangar space, maintenance, fuel and all other services are set at market rates, and Mr. Donnelly fully reimburses us at such market rates and for any expenses incurred by the company. We also entered into a Hangar License and Services Agreement on the same date with our Chief Financial Officer's limited liability company under which Mr. Connor’s LLC leases a portion of our hangar

space for his personal airplane at a market rate. No other services are currently provided with respect to Mr. Connor’s aircraft

Item 6.

EXHIBITS

3.1	Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Textron Inc., filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on April 27, 2011

3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Textron Inc., effective April 28, 2010 and as further amended April 27, 2011

10.1	Hangar License and Services Agreement made and entered into on April 25, 2011 to be effective as of December 5, 2010, between Textron Inc. and Mr. Donnelly’s limited liability company

10.2	Hangar License and Services Agreement made and entered into on April 25, 2011 to be effective as of December 5, 2010, between Textron Inc. and Mr. Connor’s limited liability company

12.1	Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. Manufacturing Group

12.2	Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. including all majority-owned subsidiaries

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

The following materials from Textron Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		TEXTRON INC.
Date:	April 28, 2011	/s/Richard L. Yates
		Richard L. Yates Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (principal accounting officer)

LIST OF EXHIBITS

3.1	Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Textron Inc., filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on April 27, 2011

3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Textron Inc., effective April 28, 2010 and as further amended April 27, 2011

10.1	Hangar License and Services Agreement made and entered into on April 25, 2011 to be effective as of December 5, 2010, between Textron Inc. and Mr. Donnelly’s limited liability company

10.2	Hangar License and Services Agreement made and entered into on April 25, 2011 to be effective as of December 5, 2010, between Textron Inc. and Mr. Connor’s limited liability company

12.1	Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. Manufacturing Group

12.2	Computation of ratio of income to fixed charges of Textron Inc. including all majority-owned subsidiaries

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101