e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended August
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
[ ]
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
|
|
|
For
the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number 0-22496
SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
OREGON
|
|
|
|
93-0341923
|
|
|
|
|
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3200 N.W. Yeon Ave.,
|
|
|
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
|
97210
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(503) 224-9900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 par
value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market,
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Title of Each Class)
|
|
(Name of each Exchange on which
registered)
|
Class A Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in the definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (check one)
Large Accelerated Filer
[X] Accelerated Filer
[ ] Non-Accelerated
Filer [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting
common stock outstanding held by non-affiliates on
February 28, 2007 was $813,850,848.
The Registrant had 21,230,715 shares of Class A Common
Stock, par value of $1.00 per share, and 7,328,387 shares
of Class B Common Stock, par value of $1.00 per share,
outstanding at October 19, 2007.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for
the January 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated
herein by reference in Part III.
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Statements and information included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
by Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (the Company)
that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and are made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
include statements regarding the Companys expectations,
intentions, beliefs and strategies regarding the future,
including statements regarding trends, cyclicality, and growth
in the markets the Company sells into, strategic direction,
changes to manufacturing processes, the cost of compliance with
environmental and other laws, liquidity positions, ability to
generate cash from continuing operations, expected growth, the
potential impact of adopting new accounting pronouncements,
expected results including pricing, sales volume, operating
margins and operating income, obligations under the
Companys retirement plans, savings or additional costs
from business realignment programs, and the adequacy of
accruals.
When used in this report, the words believes,
expects, anticipates,
intends, assumes, estimates,
evaluates, may, could,
opinions, forecasts, future,
forward, potential,
probable, and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements.
The Company may make other forward-looking statements from
time to time, including in press releases and public conference
calls. All forward-looking statements made by the Company are
based on information available to the Company at the time the
statements are made, and the Company assumes no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements, except as may be required
by law. Actual results are subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those included in, or implied by, such
forward-looking statements. Some of these risks and
uncertainties are discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors of
Part I of this
Form 10-K.
Other examples include volatile supply and demand conditions
affecting prices and volumes in the markets for both the
Companys products and raw materials it purchases; world
economic conditions; world political conditions; changes in
federal and state income tax laws; impact of pending or new laws
and regulations regarding imports and exports into the United
States and other foreign countries; foreign currency
fluctuations; competition; seasonality, including weather;
energy supplies; freight rates; loss of key personnel;
expectations regarding the Companys compliance program;
business integration issues relating to acquisitions of
businesses and the separation of the joint ventures described
herein; credit worthiness of suppliers and customers; new
accounting pronouncements; availability of capital resources and
business disruptions resulting from installation or replacement
of major capital assets.
1
General
Founded in 1906, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (the
Company), an Oregon corporation, is currently one of the
nations largest recyclers of ferrous and nonferrous
metals, a leading recycler of used and salvaged vehicles and a
manufacturer of finished steel products.
The Company provides an end of life cycle solution for a variety
of products through its vertically integrated businesses,
including processing auto bodies and other metal products,
resale of used auto parts and manufacturing scrap metal into
finished steel products. The Company operates in three
reportable segments: the Metals Recycling Business
(MRB), the Auto Parts Business (APB) and
the Steel Manufacturing Business (SMB). Corporate
expense consists primarily of unallocated corporate expense for
management and administrative services that benefit all three
business segments. As a result of this unallocated expense, the
operating income of each segment does not reflect the operating
income the segment would have as a stand-alone business. For
further information regarding the Companys segments,
including financial information about geographic areas, refer to
Note 17 Segment Information, in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements, in Part II,
Item 8 of this report.
Metals
Recycling Business
Business
MRB buys, collects, processes, recycles, sells, trades and
brokers recycled ferrous metals (containing iron) to foreign and
domestic steel producers, including SMB, and nonferrous metals
(not containing iron) to both domestic and export markets. MRB
processes large pieces of scrap metal into smaller pieces by
sorting, shearing, shredding, torching and baling, resulting in
metal processed into pieces of a size, density and purity
required by customers to meet their production needs. Smaller,
more homogenous pieces of processed metal have more value
because they melt more easily than larger pieces and, in the
case of ferrous metals, more completely fill a steel mills
furnace charge bucket, which results in lower energy usage and
shorter cycle times, thus reducing costs.
One of the most efficient ways to process and sort recycled
metals is to use shredding systems. Currently, each of the
Companys Everett, Massachusetts; Portland, Oregon;
Oakland, California; and Tacoma, Washington facilities has a
mega-shredder capable of processing over 2,500 tons of metal per
day. The Companys Johnston, Rhode Island facility operates
a large shredder capable of processing up to 1,500 tons of metal
per day, and the Kapolei, Hawaii and Anchorage, Alaska
facilities operate smaller shredders. Coupled with additional
capacity, the mega-shredders provide the ability to shred more
efficiently and process a greater range of materials, including
larger and thicker pieces of metal. Mega-shredders are designed
to provide a denser product and, in conjunction with new
separation equipment, a more refined and preferable form of
ferrous metal which can be more efficiently used by steel mills.
The larger shredders are also able to accept more types of
material, resulting in more efficient processing. Shredders can
reduce autobodies, home appliances and other metal into
fist-size pieces of shredded recycled metal in seconds. The
shredded material is then carried by conveyor under magnetized
drums that attract the recycled ferrous metal and separate it
from the nonferrous metal and other residue found in the
shredded material, resulting in a relatively pure and clean
shredded ferrous product. The remaining nonferrous metal and
residue then pass through a series of mechanical and manual
sorting systems that are designed to separate the nonferrous
metal from the residue. The remaining nonferrous metal is either
hand sorted and graded before being sold or is sold as a mixed
product. MRB continues to invest in nonferrous metal recovery
methods in order to maximize the recoverability of valuable
nonferrous metals.
MRB has a global trade component of its business that purchases
processed ferrous metal from metal processors operating in
Russia and certain Baltic countries, and sells this metal to
steel mills located primarily in Europe and the Mediterranean.
Russia and the Baltic countries are attractive markets because
of the ample supply of unprocessed metal available to metal
processors due to the Cold War Era infrastructures, many of
which are closed or obsolete. However, the Russian and Baltic
transportation infrastructures make it more economically
challenging to access the metal. MRBs management believes
that this business complements its processing
2
business and allows it to further meet its customers needs
as well as expand its global market share of the recycled
ferrous metal business.
Products
MRB sells both ferrous and nonferrous scrap metals. The
ferrous products include shredded, sheared, torched and bundled
scrap metal, and other purchased scrap metal. MRB also processes
and sells nonferrous scrap metals, including aluminum, copper,
stainless steel, nickel, brass, titanium and high temperature
alloys.
Customers
MRB sells recycled metal to foreign and domestic customers and
provides nearly 100% of the ferrous scrap metal required by SMB.
MRB has developed long-standing relationships with foreign and
domestic steel producers.
Presented below are MRB revenues by continent for the year ended
August 31 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
North America
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales to SMB
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,903
|
|
|
$
|
1,264
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, MRB accomplished its goal of expanding and diversifying
its customer base by significantly increasing its sales to
customers in Taiwan, Turkey, Malaysia, Spain, India, Egypt,
Mexico and other countries located in Asia and Europe. In 2007,
MRB further expanded its base of regular scrap consumers to
include, among others, customers in Greece, Japan and Indonesia.
MRB has representatives in South Korea, China, Taiwan, Southeast
Asia and Japan to better serve the Asian markets to which it
sells.
MRBs five largest ferrous metal customers accounted for
25%, 23% and 66% of recycled ferrous metal revenues to
unaffiliated customers in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. There were no external customers that accounted
for 10% or more of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2007 or
fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005 there was one external customer that
accounted for $108 million, or 13%, of consolidated
revenues. Customer purchase volumes of recycled ferrous metals
vary from year to year due to demand, competition, relative
currency values and other factors. Ferrous metal sales are
generally denominated in United States (U.S.)
dollars, and most shipments to foreign customers are supported
by letters of credit. Ferrous metal is shipped to customers by
ship, railroad, barge, container or truck.
The following table sets forth the amount of recycled ferrous
metal sold by MRB to certain groups of customers during the last
three fiscal years ended August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Foreign-processed
|
|
$
|
925,410
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
$
|
533,453
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
$
|
336,262
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
Foreign-trading
|
|
|
381,066
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
330,296
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
SMB
|
|
|
185,699
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
142,296
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
137,092
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Domestic - processed
|
|
|
189,678
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
125,475
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
14,852
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recycled ferrous metal
|
|
$
|
1,681,853
|
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
$
|
1,131,520
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
$
|
488,206
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Revenues stated in thousands of
dollars.
|
(2)
|
|
Volume in long tons (2,240 pounds).
|
MRB also sells recycled nonferrous metal to foreign and domestic
customers. By continuing to improve the extraction processes
used to recover nonferrous metal from the shredding process, MRB
has been able to increase
3
the supply of nonferrous product available to sell to foreign
and domestic customers. Many of MRBs industrial suppliers
utilize nonferrous metal in manufacturing automobiles and auto
parts.
The following table sets forth the amount of recycled nonferrous
metal sold by MRB to foreign and domestic customers during the
last three fiscal years ended August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
$
|
193,752
|
|
|
|
209,725
|
|
|
$
|
150,670
|
|
|
|
194,496
|
|
|
$
|
65,336
|
|
|
|
116,999
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
201,985
|
|
|
|
173,361
|
|
|
|
116,103
|
|
|
|
107,114
|
|
|
|
5,411
|
|
|
|
8,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recycled nonferrous metal
|
|
$
|
395,737
|
|
|
|
383,086
|
|
|
$
|
266,773
|
|
|
|
301,610
|
|
|
$
|
70,747
|
|
|
|
125,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Revenues stated in thousands of
dollars.
|
(2)
|
|
Volume in thousands of pounds.
|
Markets
Prices for both domestic and foreign recycled ferrous metals are
generally based on prevailing market rates, which can differ by
region and are subject to market cycles that are influenced by
many factors, including worldwide demand from steel and other
metal producers and the availability of materials that can be
processed into saleable scrap. In recent years, worldwide demand
for finished steel products has been growing at a faster rate
than the available supply of recycled ferrous metal, which is
one of the primary raw materials used in the manufacturing of
steel. Demand for steel and for raw materials to produce steel
products has increased recently, including as a result, the
substantial increase in Chinese production and consumption of
steel. MRBs average net sales price per ton for recycled
ferrous metal increased from $215 per ton in fiscal 2006 to $263
per ton in fiscal 2007, setting a historical record. Export
recycled ferrous metal sales contracts generally provide for
shipment within 30 to 90 days after the price is agreed to,
which, in most cases, includes freight. MRB responds to changing
price levels by adjusting scrap metal purchase prices at its
recycling facilities in order to help maintain its operating
margin dollars per ton. However, the margin between selling
prices and the cost of purchased material are subject to a
number of factors, including differences in the market
conditions in the domestic regions where recycled metal is
acquired and the areas in the world where the processed
materials are sold, market volatility from the time the sales
price is agreed to with the customer until the time the material
is acquired, and changes in the assumed costs of transportation
to or from the sellers facility. MRB believes it generally
benefits from rising recycled metal prices, which allow it to
better maintain or expand both margins and unprocessed metal
flow into its facilities. MRB also reduces its exposure to
declining market prices by reducing the time that inventory is
held, thus increasing inventory turnover.
Consolidation
in the Scrap Metal Industry
The metals recycling industry has been consolidating over the
last several years, primarily due to an increase in scrap metal
prices, the growth in global demand for scrap metal, a high
degree of fragmentation in the industry and the ability of
large, well-capitalized processors to achieve competitive
advantages by investing in capital improvements to improve
efficiencies and lower processing costs.
Distribution
MRB delivers recycled ferrous and nonferrous metals to foreign
steel customers by ship and container, and domestically by
barge, rail and over the road transportation networks. Cost
efficiencies are achieved by operating deep water terminal
facilities at Everett, Massachusetts; Portland, Oregon; Oakland,
California; Tacoma, Washington; Anchorage, Alaska; and
Providence, Rhode Island. All of MRBs terminal facilities
except for the Providence, Rhode Island facility, which is
operated under a long-term lease, are owned. The Kapolei, Hawaii
and Anchorage, Alaska operations ship from public docks.
Additionally, because most of the terminal facilities are
operated by MRB, it is not normally subject to the same berthing
delays often experienced by users of unaffiliated terminals. MRB
believes that its loading costs are lower than they would be if
it utilized third-party terminal facilities.
4
Sources
of Unprocessed Metal
The most common forms of purchased raw metals are obsolete
machinery and equipment, such as automobiles, railroad cars,
railroad tracks, home appliances, waste metal from manufacturing
operations and demolition metal from buildings and other
obsolete structures. This metal is acquired from suppliers who
unload at MRBs facilities, from drop boxes at a diverse
base of suppliers industrial sites and through negotiated
purchases from other large suppliers, including railroads,
industrial manufacturers, automobile salvage facilities, metal
dealers and individuals. The majority of MRBs scrap metal
collection and processing facilities receive raw metal via major
railroad routes, waterways or major highways. Metals recycling
facilities situated near unprocessed metal sellers and major
transportation routes have the competitive advantage of reduced
freight costs because of the significant cost of freight
relative to the cost of metal. The locations of MRBs West
Coast facilities allow it to competitively purchase raw metal
from Hawaii, the San Francisco Bay area, northwards up the
West Coast to Western Canada and Alaska and to the east,
including Idaho, Montana, Utah and Nevada. The locations of the
East Coast facilities provide access to sources of unprocessed
metal in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode
Island and Vermont. In the Southeastern U.S., approximately half
of MRBs ferrous and nonferrous unprocessed metal volume is
purchased from industrial companies, with the remaining volume
being purchased from smaller dealers and peddlers. These
industrial companies provide MRB with metals that are
by-products of their manufacturing processes. The Southeastern
U.S. has recently become a highly attractive location for
domestic and international auto manufacturers, specifically
Alabama and Georgia where MRBs Southeastern facilities are
located. With the rise of automobile manufacturing in the
Southeast, automobile parts manufacturers have also established
facilities in this area. These manufacturers have provided a
consistent and growing supply of scrap metal.
Seasonality
MRB makes a number of large recycled ferrous metal shipments to
foreign steel producers each year. Control over the timing of
shipments is limited by customer requirements, shipping
schedules, availability of suitable vessels and other factors.
Variations in the number of shipments from quarter to quarter,
often as a result of the timing of obtaining vessels, can result
in significant fluctuations in quarterly revenues, earnings and
inventory levels. Freezing conditions in the Baltic region
generally limit the ability to ship product from this area
during parts of the second and third fiscal quarters.
Backlog
On August 31, 2007, MRB had firm orders to sell
$141 million of export ferrous metals compared to
$145 million on August 31, 2006.
Competition
MRB competes in domestic and foreign markets for the purchase of
scrap metal from suppliers. Competition for metal purchases
comes primarily from large well-financed recyclers of scrap
metal as well as smaller metal facilities and dealers. Many of
these recyclers have varying types and sizes of processing
equipment that include fixed and mobile shears and large and
small ferrous metal shredders, all of which have varying effects
on the purchase price of recycled metal. MRB also competes with
brokers who buy scrap metal on behalf of domestic and foreign
steel mills. Brokers have also begun to coordinate shipments of
certain grades of processed scrap from smaller scrap dealers to
foreign mills via shipping containers. The predominant
competitive factors that impact recycled metal sales and the
ability to obtain unprocessed metal are price (including
shipping cost), availability and reliability of service and
product quality.
MRB also competes in foreign and domestic markets for the sale
of processed recycled metals to finished steel producers. Price
(including shipping cost) and availability are the two most
important competitive factors, but reliability of service and
product quality are also relevant factors.
5
Auto
Parts Business
Business
and Products
APB purchases used and salvaged vehicles and sells used parts
from these vehicles through its self-service and full-service
auto parts stores, which are located across the U.S. and
Western Canada. The remaining portions of the vehicles are sold
to metal recyclers, including MRB where geographically feasible.
Auto parts stores operated by APB as of August 31, included
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
Self-service locations
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Full-service locations
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stores
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Included in the 2006 self-service
locations was one location that was under conversion from a
full-service location to a self-service location and was not
operational at August 31, 2006.
|
Customers
Self-service stores generally serve customers who are looking to
obtain serviceable used auto parts at a competitive price. These
customers remove the used auto parts from vehicles in inventory
without the assistance of store employees. Full-service stores
generally serve business or wholesale customers, typically
collision and repair shops, that are looking to obtain
serviceable used parts at prices that are less than prices for
new parts. Full-service stores retain professional staff to
dismantle and inventory individual parts. Once parts are sold,
they are pulled from inventory, cleaned, tested and delivered
via APB delivery trucks and third parties to the customer. APB
has one location that is comprised of both self-service and
full-service stores. APB believes that it has enhanced the
Companys competitive advantage through its proprietary
technology, which is used to centrally manage and operate the
geographically diverse network; by applying a consistent
approach to offering customers a large selection of vehicles
from which to obtain parts; and by its efficient processing of
autobodies. Additionally, APB has taken various steps, including
remodeling certain facilities, to improve the customers
shopping experience. There were no external customers that
accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues in fiscal
2007, 2006 or 2005.
APB is dedicated to supplying low-cost used auto parts to its
customers. In general, management believes that the prices of
parts at its self-service stores are significantly lower than
those offered at full-service auto dismantlers, retail car part
stores and car dealerships. Each self-service store offers an
extensive selection of vehicles from which consumers can remove
parts. APB carries domestic and foreign cars, vans and light
trucks and regularly rotates its inventory to provide its
customers with greater access to a continually changing parts
inventory.
APB total revenues for the year ended August 31 were (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
266,354
|
|
|
$
|
218,130
|
|
|
$
|
107,808
|
|
Sales to MRB
|
|
|
(22,209
|
)
|
|
|
(14,513
|
)
|
|
|
(13,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
244,145
|
|
|
$
|
203,617
|
|
|
$
|
94,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fragmentation
of the Auto Parts Industry
The auto parts industry is characterized by diverse and
fragmented competition and is comprised of a large number of
aftermarket and used auto part suppliers of all sizes. These
companies range from large, multinational corporations, which
serve both original equipment manufacturers and the aftermarket
on a worldwide basis, to small, local producers that supply only
a few parts for a particular car model. The auto parts industry
is also characterized by a wide range of consumers as some
consumers tend to demand original replacement parts, while
others are price sensitive and exhibit minimal brand loyalty.
6
Distribution
APB sells used auto parts from each of its self-service and
full-service retail stores. Upon arriving at a self-service
store, a customer typically pays an admission charge and signs a
liability waiver before entering the facility. When a customer
finds a desired part on a vehicle, the customer removes it and
pays a pre-established price for the part. The full-service
business sells its parts primarily to collision and mechanical
repair shops through its sales force, which includes inside and
outside sales people. Once these parts are sold, they are pulled
from inventory, cleaned, tested, and shipped to the customer
through a network of company delivery trucks. In addition, the
full-service business offers its customers visibility to all
parts in inventory within a given region and fulfills orders
with next day delivery by running nightly transfer trucks
between locations.
Once the vehicle is removed from the customer area, certain
remaining parts that can be sold wholesale (cores) are removed
from the vehicle. In California, Florida and Texas, these cores
(such as engines, transmissions and alternators) are
consolidated at central facilities. From these facilities, the
parts are sold through an auction system to a variety of
wholesale buyers. Due to larger volumes generated by this
consolidation process and higher prices for nonferrous metals,
APB has been able to obtain increasingly higher prices for these
cores.
After the core removal process is complete, the remaining
autobody is crushed and sold as scrap metal in the wholesale
market. The autobodies are sold on a price per ton basis, which
is subject to fluctuations in the recycled ferrous metal
markets. During fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, APB generated
revenues of $22 million, $15 million and
$13 million from sales to MRB respectively, thereby making
MRB the single largest wholesale customer of APB. APBs
wholesale business consists of its core and scrap sales.
Marketing
APB continues to support the marketing initiatives unique to
each of the self-service and full-service business lines. The
full-service brand marketing plan recognizes the role that
institutional entities, such as insurance companies and
consolidators, as well as local repair facilities, play in the
purchasing cycle and utilizes a marketing infrastructure that
addresses all levels of customers. Through market education
forums, market mailer programs, participation in industry forums
and local marketing initiatives, the full-service platform
highlights the advantages of using recycled auto parts to the
consumer. The full-service brand also expanded its field
representation to several key markets.
The self-service platform continues to focus on the local
markets surrounding the stores and incorporates various
components, including a points-based system for buying media,
which is focused on making targeted impressions in the market;
this includes the use of radio to support promotional events,
regularly scheduled in-store promotions, and product promotion.
Each store has a customized marketing calendar designed for its
market and the community it serves.
APB typically seeks to locate its facilities with convenient
access to major streets and in major population centers. By
operating at locations that are convenient and visible to the
target customer, the stores seek to become the customers
first stop in acquiring used auto parts. Convenient locations
also make it easier and less expensive for suppliers to deliver
vehicles. APB has also developed a
side-by-side
full-service and self-service location to enhance the scope of
parts available to its customers.
Sources
of Vehicles
APB obtains vehicles from five primary sources: tow
companies, private parties, auto auctions, city contracts and
charities. APB employs car buyers who travel to vendors and bid
on vehicles. APB also has a program to purchase vehicles from
private parties called Cash for Junk Cars, which is
advertised in telephone directories and newspapers. Private
parties call a toll free number and receive a quote for their
vehicle. The private party can either deliver the vehicle to one
of APBs retail locations or arrange for the vehicle to be
picked up. APB is also attempting to secure more vehicle
supplies at the source by contracting with additional suppliers.
The full-service business also purchases damaged vehicles,
reacquired vehicles and salvageable production parts from
inactive test vehicles from Ford Motor Company and resells these
parts through its sales network.
7
Seasonality
Historically, retail sales and admissions in the self-service
stores have been somewhat seasonal and principally affected by
weather and promotional events. Since APBs self-service
stores are subject to the natural elements, during periods of
prolonged rain, cold or extreme heat, the retail business tends
to slow down due to difficult customer working conditions. As a
result, the first and third fiscal quarters tend to generate the
most retail sales and the second and fourth fiscal quarters are
the slowest in terms of retail sales in the self-service stores.
By contrast, business at the full-service stores, which supply
collision shops, tends to increase during and immediately
following periods of inclement weather.
Competition
APB competes for customers with other self-service and
full-service auto dismantlers as well as larger well-financed
retail auto parts businesses. In addition, APB competes for
vehicle inventory with other dismantlers, used car dealers, auto
auctions and metal recyclers. Vehicle costs can fluctuate
significantly depending on market conditions and prices for
recycled metal.
Steel
Manufacturing Business
Business
SMB purchases recycled metal from MRB at negotiated rates
intended to approximate export market prices and uses its
mini-mill to process the recycled metal and other raw materials
into finished steel products.
Products
SMB produces rebar, coiled rebar, wire rod, merchant bar, and
other specialty products. Rebar is produced in either straight
length steel bars or coils and used to increase the tensile
strength of poured concrete. Coiled rebar is preferred by some
manufacturers because it reduces the waste generated by cutting
individual lengths to meet customer specifications and,
therefore, improves yield. Merchant bar consists of round, flat,
angle and square steel bars used by manufacturers to produce a
wide variety of products, including gratings, steel floor and
roof joists, safety walkways, ornamental furniture, stair
railings and farm equipment. Wire rod is steel wire, delivered
in coiled form, used by manufacturers to produce a variety of
products such as chain link fencing, nails, wire and stucco
netting.
The table below sets forth, on a revenue and volume basis, the
sale of these products during the last three fiscal years ended
August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
Volume(2)
|
|
|
Rebar
|
|
$
|
272,602
|
|
|
|
451,624
|
|
|
$
|
214,955
|
|
|
|
389,603
|
|
|
$
|
163,075
|
|
|
|
315,562
|
|
Coiled rebar
|
|
|
40,742
|
|
|
|
63,742
|
|
|
|
46,603
|
|
|
|
78,133
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
57,664
|
|
Merchant bar
|
|
|
43,584
|
|
|
|
65,578
|
|
|
|
46,243
|
|
|
|
76,145
|
|
|
|
34,346
|
|
|
|
59,656
|
|
Wire rod
|
|
|
66,321
|
|
|
|
129,105
|
|
|
|
77,310
|
|
|
|
155,241
|
|
|
|
85,125
|
|
|
|
158,291
|
|
Other products
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
3,607
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
424,550
|
|
|
|
712,958
|
|
|
$
|
386,610
|
|
|
|
702,729
|
|
|
$
|
315,476
|
|
|
|
592,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues stated in thousands of dollars. |
(2) |
|
Volume in short tons (2,000 pounds). |
Customers
During fiscal 2007, SMB sold its steel products to customers
located primarily in the ten western states. Customers in
California accounted for 42% of these sales. SMBs
customers are principally steel service centers, construction
industry subcontractors, steel fabricators, wire drawers and
major farm and wood product suppliers. SMBs ten largest
customers accounted for 34%, 38% and 44% of its revenues during
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
8
There were no external customers that accounted for 10% or more
of consolidated revenues in fiscal 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Consolidation
in the Steel Industry
There has been significant consolidation in the global steel
industry. Within the past few years, the U.S. steel
industry has significantly consolidated, primarily led by
Arcelor Mittal, United States Steel Corporation, Nucor
Corporation and Steel Dynamics, Inc. Consolidation is also
taking place in Central and Eastern Europe as well as in China.
Cross border consolidation has also occurred with the aim of
achieving greater efficiency and economies of scale,
particularly in response to the effective consolidation
undertaken by raw material suppliers and consumers of steel
products.
Distribution
SMB sells directly from its mini-mill in McMinnville, Oregon,
from its owned distribution center in El Monte, California (Los
Angeles area) and from a third-party distribution center in
Lathrop, California (Central California). The distribution
centers facilitate sales by maintaining an inventory of products
close to major customers for
just-in-time
delivery. SMB communicates regularly with major customers to
determine their anticipated needs and plans its rolling mill
production schedule accordingly. Shipments to customers are made
by common carrier, primarily truck or rail.
Recycled
Metal Supply
SMB believes it operates the only mini-mill in the Western
U.S. that benefits from obtaining its entire recycled metal
requirements from its own affiliated metal recycling operations,
which is beneficial because there have been times where regional
shortages of recycled metals have caused some mills to pay
higher prices for recycled metal shipped from other regions or
to temporarily curtail operations. MRB is able to deliver a mix
of recycled metal grades to achieve optimum efficiency in
SMBs melting operations. Because the steel mill, and major
MRB facilities are located on railway routes, SMB benefits from
the reduced cost of shipping recycled metal by rail.
Energy
Supply
Electricity represented 4% of SMBs cost of goods sold in
fiscal 2007 and 5% of cost of goods sold in fiscal 2006 and
2005. Natural gas represented 3% of cost of goods sold in fiscal
2007 and 2006 and 2% of cost of goods sold in fiscal 2005.
SMB purchases electric power under a long-term contract with
McMinnville Water & Light (MWL), which in
turn relies on the Bonneville Power Administration (the
BPA). Historically, these contracts have had
favorable prices. This contract expires in September 2011. On
October 1, 2001, the BPA increased its electricity rates
due to increased demand on the West Coast and lower supplies.
This rate increase was in the form of a Cost Recovery Adjustment
Clause (CRAC) added to the BPAs contract with
MWL. The CRAC is an additional monthly surcharge on selected
power charges to recover costs associated with buying higher
priced power during West Coast power shortages. Starting
October 1, 2006, the BPA can adjust the CRAC on an annual
basis instead of every six months. The CRAC for October 1,
2007 to September 30, 2008 is expected to be zero.
SMB also has a take-or-pay natural gas contract that expires on
May 31, 2011 and obligates it to purchase a minimum of
3,435 million British Thermal Units (MMBTU) per
day at tiered pricing, whether or not the amount is utilized.
The blended rate for the period from November 1, 2006
through October 31, 2007 was $8.22 per MMBTU. Effective for
the delivery period from November 1, 2007 through
October 31, 2008, the blended rate will decrease from $8.22
per MMBTU per day to $7.70 per MMBTU per day.
Manufacturing
SMB has continued to reinvest in its mini-mill to improve
efficiencies. SMBs meltshop includes a 108-ton capacity
electric-arc furnace, a ladle refining furnace and a five-strand
continuous billet caster. The melt shop has enhanced steel
chemistry refining capabilities, permitting the mill to produce
special alloy grades of steel not currently
9
produced by other mills on the West Coast. The melt shop
produced 762,000, 719,000 and 672,000 tons of billets during
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
SMB operates two computerized rolling mills that allow for
synchronized operations of the rolling mills and related
equipment. The billets produced in the melt shop are reheated in
two natural gas-fueled furnaces and are then hot- rolled through
the two rolling mills to produce finished products. Rolling
mill #1 is a 17-stand mill that was rebuilt in 1986.
Rolling mill #2 is an 18-stand mill which was installed in
1996. In 1997, a rod block and related equipment for the
manufacture of wire and coiled rebar was added to rolling
mill #2. Since then, SMB has completed a number of
improvement projects to both mills designed to increase the
operating efficiency of each mill as well as to increase the
types of products that can be competitively produced. Management
continues to monitor the market for new products and, through
discussions with customers, identify additional opportunities.
During fiscal 2007, SMB completed the process of enlarging the
billet reheat furnace on rolling mill #2 as well as
upgrading the billet yard craneway. These capital projects
enable SMB to increase rebar production capabilities on rolling
mill #2 as well as improve the process of inventory
movement in the billet yard. This allowed SMB to increase its
finished steel production from 698,000 tons in fiscal 2006 to
724,000 tons in fiscal 2007. As a result of these projects, SMB
believes that its annual production capacity is now in excess of
750,000 tons.
Seasonality
SMB revenues can fluctuate significantly between quarters due to
factors such as the seasonal slowdown in the construction
industry, which occurs from the late fall through early spring.
In the past, SMB has generally experienced its lowest sales
during the second fiscal quarter. In fiscal 2007 and 2006, SMB
did not experience a significant slowdown in the second quarter
due to announced sales price increases, which resulted in an
acceleration of sales orders that normally would have occurred
in subsequent quarters. Although SMB did not experience a
slowdown in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 or 2006, it
expects this pattern to recur in the future.
Backlog
SMB generally ships products within days after the receipt of
purchase orders. Backlog orders are seasonal and are typically
greater in the third and fourth fiscal quarters. As of
August 31, 2007 SMB had backlog orders of $17 million,
compared to $16 million as of August 31, 2006.
Competition
The principal competitive factors in SMBs market are
price, product availability, quality and service. The
mills primary domestic competitors are Nucor
Corporations manufacturing facilities in Utah and
Washington and TAMCO Steels facility in California.
In addition to domestic competition, SMB has historically
competed intensely with foreign steel producers principally
located in Asia, Canada, Mexico and Central and South America,
primarily in shorter length rebar and certain wire rod grades.
In the spring of 2002, the U.S. Government imposed
anti-dumping and countervailing duties against wire rod products
from eight foreign countries. These duties remain in effect
today, are periodically reviewed and do not have a set
expiration date. In July of 2007, the International Trade
Commission extended existing rebar anti-dumping duties of up to
233% on imports from seven nations, through 2012.
Strategic
Focus
Company
Growth
In fiscal 2007, the Company completed the following acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2006, the Company acquired a metals recycling
business to provide additional sources of scrap metal for the
mega-shredder in Everett, Massachusetts. The acquisition was not
material to the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2007, the Company acquired two metals recycling
businesses that separately provide scrap metal to the Everett,
Massachusetts and Tacoma, Washington facilities. Neither
acquisition was material to the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
|
In fiscal 2006, the Company completed the following acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2005, the Company and the Hugo Neu Corporation
(HNC) and certain of their subsidiaries closed a
transaction to separate and terminate their metals recycling
joint venture relationships. As part of the separation and
termination agreement, the Company received from HNC various
joint venture interests, other businesses and a $37 million
cash payment; while HNC received from the Company various other
joint venture interests. A dispute exists between the Company
and HNC over post-closing adjustments. The Company believes that
it has adequately accrued for any disputed amounts.
|
|
|
In September 2005, the Company acquired GreenLeaf Auto
Recyclers, LLC (GreenLeaf) and five store properties
previously leased by GreenLeaf and assumed certain GreenLeaf
liabilities. The purchase price of $45 million was paid in
cash.
|
|
|
In October 2005, the Company acquired substantially all of the
assets and assumed certain liabilities of Regional Recycling LLC
(Regional), a metals recycling business with nine
facilities in Georgia and Alabama. The purchase price of
$69 million was paid in cash.
|
|
|
In March 2006, the Company purchased the remaining 40% minority
interest in Metals Recycling LLC (MRL), its Rhode
Island metals recycling subsidiary, and assumed certain
liabilities. The purchase price of $25 million was paid in
cash.
|
The Company intends to continue to focus on growth through
value-creating acquisitions and will pursue acquisition
opportunities it believes will create shareholder value and earn
after-tax income in excess of its cost of capital. With the
Companys continued strong balance sheet, cash flows from
operations and available borrowing capacity, the Company
believes it is in an attractive position to complete reasonably
priced acquisitions fitting the Companys long-term
strategic plans.
Processing
and Manufacturing Technology Improvements
The Company aims to be an efficient and competitive producer of
both recycled metal and finished steel products in order to
maximize the operating margin for both operations. To meet this
objective, the Company has historically focused on, and will
continue to emphasize, the cost effective purchasing of and
efficient processing of scrap metals. During fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005, the Company spent $81 million, $87 million
and $48 million, respectively, on capital improvements. The
increases in capital expenditures primarily reflect the
Companys significant investments in modern equipment to
improve the efficiency and the capabilities of its businesses
and to further maximize economies of scale. The capital
expenditures in fiscal 2007 included partial payments for the
installation of new mega-shredders at the Companys
Oakland, California; Everett, Massachusetts; and Portland,
Oregon export facilities, major repairs to the dock at the
Portland facility and other upgrades to equipment and
infrastructure at the Companys metals recycling
facilities. The Company also expended capital for the
implementation of a point-of-sale system at its self-service
used auto parts stores, the conversion of five sites acquired in
the GreenLeaf acquisition to the Companys self-service
store model and the reheat furnace and upgrade of the billet
craneway and other projects at the SMB facility designed to
improve efficiency and increase output. The Company believes
these investments will provide future returns in excess of its
cost of capital and will create value for its shareholders.
Capital projects in fiscal 2008 are expected to include
significant enhancements to the Companys information
technology infrastructure, further investments in technology to
improve the recovery of nonferrous materials from the shredding
process, establishment of additional nonferrous collection
facilities, improvements to the Companys marine shipping
infrastructure and further investments to improve efficiency,
increase worker safety and enhance environmental systems.
11
Environmental
Compliance
Compliance with environmental laws and regulations is a
significant factor in the Companys business operations.
The Companys businesses are subject to local, state and
federal environmental, health, safety and transportation laws
and regulations relating to, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
|
|
|
remediation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
|
|
|
the discharge of materials and emissions into the air;
|
|
|
the remediation of soil and groundwater contamination;
|
|
|
the management and treatment of wastewater and storm water;
|
|
|
the treatment, handling and disposal of solid hazardous and
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) waste; and
|
|
|
the protection of the Companys employee health and safety.
|
Environmental legislation and regulations have changed rapidly
in recent years, and it is likely that the Company will be
subject to even more stringent environmental standards in the
future and will be required to make additional expenditures,
which could be significant, relating to environmental matters on
an ongoing basis.
It is not possible to predict the total cost to remediate
environmental matters or the amount of capital expenditures or
the increases in operating costs or other expenses that may be
incurred by the Company or its subsidiaries in complying with
environmental requirements applicable to the Company, its
subsidiaries and their operations, or whether all such cost
increases can be passed on to customers through product price
increases. Moreover, environmental legislation has been enacted,
and may in the future be enacted, to create liability for past
actions that were lawful at the time taken but have been found
to affect the environment and to increase public rights of
action for environmental conditions and activities. As is the
case with steel producers and recycled metal processors in
general, if damage to persons or the environment has been
caused, or could be caused in the future, by the Companys
activities or by hazardous substances now or hereafter located
at the Companys facilities, the Company may be fined
and/or held
liable for such damage and, in addition, may be required to
remedy the condition. There can be no assurance that potential
liabilities, expenditures, fines and penalties associated with
environmental laws and regulations will not be imposed on the
Company in the future or that such liabilities, expenditures,
fines or penalties will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company.
The Company has, in the past, been found not to be in compliance
with certain environmental laws and regulations and has incurred
liabilities, expenditures, fines and penalties associated with
such violations. The Companys objective is to maintain
compliance with applicable environmental regulations.
The Company believes that it is materially in compliance with
currently applicable environmental regulations. See
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies, in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements, in Part II,
Item 8, of this report.
Employees
As of August 31, 2007, the Company had 3,499 full-time
employees, consisting of 1,300 employees at MRB,
543 employees at SMB, 1,528 employees at APB and 128
corporate administrative employees. Of these employees, 993 were
covered by collective bargaining agreements with the
Companys twenty unions. The SMB contract with the United
Steelworkers of America (USA) covers 394 of these
employees. This contract, which was successfully negotiated in
fiscal 2005 and expires on April 1, 2008, now incorporates
a production incentive bonus which ties a component of
compensation to production improvements. The Company believes
that in general its labor relations are good.
Available
Information
The Companys internet address is
www.schnitzersteel.com. The Company makes all filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
available on its website, free of charge, under the caption
Investor
Relations
SEC Filings. Included in these filings are annual reports
on
form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
12
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports, which are available as soon
as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or
furnishing such materials with the SEC pursuant to
Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
The public may read and copy any materials that are filed with
the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room located at
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains electronic versions of reports on its
website, www.sec.gov.
Described below are risks that could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition or could cause actual results to differ materially
from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements
contained in this Annual Report. See Forward-Looking
Statements that precedes Part I of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
Additional risks and uncertainties that the Company is unaware
of or that the Company currently deems immaterial may in the
future have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition.
Risks
Relating to the Companys Businesses
Industries
in which the Company operates, are cyclical and demand can be
volatile, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial
condition.
MRB and SMB operate in industries that are cyclical in nature.
The timing and magnitude of these industry cycles are difficult
to predict. Purchase prices for autobodies and scrap metal and
selling prices for scrap and recycled metal are volatile and
beyond the Companys control. While the Company attempts to
respond to changing recycled metal selling prices through
adjustments to its metal purchase prices, the Companys
ability to do so is limited by competitive and other market
factors. Additionally, changing prices could potentially impact
the volume of scrap metal available to the Company, the volume
of processed metal sold by the Company and inventory levels. The
cyclical nature of the Companys businesses tends to
reflect and be amplified by changes in general economic
conditions, both domestically and internationally. For example,
during recessions, the automobile and construction industries
typically experience major cutbacks in production, resulting in
decreased demand for steel, copper and aluminum. This can lead
to significant decreases in demand and pricing for the
Companys recycled metal and finished steel products.
The
Companys businesses are affected by seasonal
fluctuations.
APB experiences seasonal fluctuations in demand during periods
of extreme temperatures and precipitation in the winter and
summer months as customers of the self-service stores tend to
delay their purchases and wait for milder conditions, in large
part because the retail stores are open to the elements. As a
result, retail sales are generally higher during the spring and
fall of each calendar year. Wholesale sales also experience
seasonal fluctuations, as sales to collision shops are generally
lower in periods of good weather. Demand for SMBs finished
steel product generally decreases during the winter months due
to weather-related slowdowns in the construction industry and
increases during the peak summer months, when foreign customers
tend to manufacture less in order to avoid higher energy costs.
The
principal markets served by the Company are highly
competitive.
The Company is subject to intense and increasing competition,
including a significant increase in foreign competition with SMB
in recent years. The Company also faces strong competition for
raw materials. Many factors influence the Companys
competitive position, including product differentiation,
geographic location, contract terms, business practices,
customer service and cost reductions through improved
efficiencies. Consolidation within the different industries in
which the Company operates has increased the size of some of the
Companys competitors, some of which have used their
financial resources to achieve competitive advantages by
investing in capital improvements to improve efficiencies,
achieve economies of scale and lower operating costs. If the
Company is unable to remain competitive or if competition
increases, this could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
13
Fluctuations
in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies
could adversely affect the Companys ability to price its
products competitively.
A significant portion of the revenues and operating income
earned by MRB is generated from sales to foreign customers,
including customers located in Asian and Mediterranean
countries. Some of the Companys sales transactions are
conducted in foreign currencies and may be impacted by foreign
currency fluctuations. A strong U.S. dollar would make the
Companys products more expensive for
non-U.S. customers,
which could negatively impact export sales. A strong
U.S. dollar also would make imported metal products less
expensive, resulting in an increase in imports of scrap metal,
scrap substitutes and steel products into the U.S. Past
economic difficulties in Eastern Europe, Asia and Latin America
have resulted in lower local demand for steel products and have
encouraged greater steel exports to the U.S. at depressed
prices. As a result, the Companys products, which are made
in the U.S., may become more expensive relative to imported raw
metal and steel products, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition.
The
Companys ability to deliver products to customers and the
cost of shipping and handling may be affected by circumstances
over which the Company has no control.
MRB and SMB often rely on third parties to handle and transport
their raw materials to their production facilities and finished
products to end users. Due to factors beyond the Companys
control, including changes in fuel prices, political events,
governmental regulation of transportation, changes in market
rates, carrier availability and disruptions in the
transportation infrastructure, the Company may not be able to
transport its products in a timely and cost-effective manner,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition. For example,
increases in freight costs could negatively impact the margins
from export sales. In addition, the Companys failure to
deliver products in a timely manner could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and
financial condition and harm its reputation.
The
Companys businesses depend on adequate supplies of raw
materials.
The Companys businesses require certain materials that are
sourced from third-party suppliers. Although the Companys
vertical integration allows it to be its own source for some raw
materials, particularly with respect to SMB, the Company does
rely on other suppliers, as well as industry supply conditions
generally, which involves risks, including the possibility of
increases in raw material costs and reduced control over
delivery schedules. For example, purchase prices for autobodies
and scrap metal are highly cyclical in nature and subject to
U.S. and global economic conditions. As a result, the
Company might not be able to obtain an adequate supply of
quality raw materials in a timely or cost-effective manner.
Equipment
upgrades and equipment failures may lead to production
curtailments or shutdowns.
The Companys recycling and manufacturing processes depend
upon critical pieces of equipment, including shredders and
furnaces, which may be out of service occasionally for scheduled
upgrades or maintenance or as a result of unanticipated
failures. The Company has made and is continuing to make
significant investments in modern equipment, but the
installation of new equipment may result in short-term
disruptions to operations and may take several months to
complete. In addition, the Companys facilities are subject
to equipment failures and the risk of catastrophic loss due to
unanticipated events such as fires, accidents or violent weather
conditions. As a result, the Company may experience
interruptions in its processing and production capabilities,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition.
The
Company may not be able to negotiate future labor contracts on
acceptable terms, which could result in strikes or other labor
actions.
Approximately 28% of the Companys full-time employees are
represented by collective unions under bargaining agreements. As
these agreements expire, the Company may not be able to
negotiate extensions or replacements of such agreements on terms
acceptable to the Company. Any failure to reach an agreement
with one of the Companys unions may result in strikes,
lockouts or other labor actions. Any such labor actions,
including work slowdowns or stoppages, could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys operations.
14
The
availability and cost of electricity and natural gas are subject
to volatile market conditions.
The Companys facilities are large consumers of electricity
and natural gas. The Company relies on third parties for its
supply of energy resources consumed in the manufacture of its
products. The prices for and availability of electricity,
natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to
volatile market conditions. These market conditions often are
affected by weather conditions, as well as political and
economic factors that are beyond the Companys control.
Disruptions in the supply of the Companys energy resources
could impair its ability to manufacture its products for its
customers and could result in increases in the Companys
energy costs, which could have a material adverse effect on its
results of operations and financial condition.
The
Company may not be able to successfully integrate future
acquisitions.
The Company has completed many recent acquisitions and expects
to continue making acquisitions of and strategic alliances with
complementary businesses, and investments in technologies to
enable the Company to add products and services that enhance the
Companys customer base and related markets. Execution of
this strategy involves a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Inaccurate assessment of undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
Difficulty integrating the acquired businesses personnel
and operations;
|
|
|
Potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired
business; and
|
|
|
Difficulties in realizing anticipated cost savings, efficiencies
and synergies.
|
Failure to successfully integrate acquisitions could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
If the
Company loses its key management personnel, it may not be able
to successfully manage its business or achieve its
objectives.
The Companys future success depends in large part on the
leadership and performance of its executive management team and
key employees at the operating level. If the Company were to
lose the services of several of its executive officers or key
employees at the operating level, it might not be able to
replace them with similarly qualified personnel. As a result,
the Company may not be able to successfully manage its business
or achieve its business objectives, which could have a material
adverse effect on its results of operations and financial
condition.
Some
of the Companys operations present significant risk of
injury or death.
The industrial activities conducted at the Companys
facilities present significant risk of serious injury or death
to the Companys employees, customers or other visitors to
the Companys operations, notwithstanding the
Companys safety precautions, including its material
compliance with federal, state and local employee health and
safety regulations. While the Company has in place policies and
procedures to minimize such risks, it may nevertheless be unable
to avoid material liabilities for an injury or death, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition.
A
significant increase in the use of recycled metal alternatives
by current consumers of recycled metal could reduce demand for
the Companys product.
Continuous advances in materials sciences and resulting
technologies, as well as the relative scarcity of ferrous scrap,
particularly the cleaner grades, and its high price
during periods of high demand, have given rise to new products,
such as pig iron and direct reduced iron pellets, which compete
with traditional recycled metals. Although these alternatives
have not been a major factor in the industry to date, there can
be no assurance that the use of alternatives to recycled metal
may not proliferate in the future if the prices for recycled
metals rise, if the supplies of available unprepared ferrous
scrap tighten, or if the costs to import scrap metal changes.
Any significant increase in the use of such substitutes could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations and financial condition.
15
The
Company relies on information technology in critical areas of
the Companys operations, and a disruption relating to such
technology could harm the Company.
The Company uses information technology systems in various
aspects of the Companys operations, including, but not
limited to, the management of inventories, processing costs and
customer sales. If the providers of these systems terminate
their relationships with the Company, or if the Company decides
to switch providers or to implement its own systems, it may
suffer disruptions, which could have a material adverse effect
on its results of operations and financial condition. In
addition, the Company may underestimate the costs and expenses
of switching providers or developing and implementing its own
systems.
The
Company could be subject to product liability
claims.
If customers of repair shops that purchase the Companys
recycled auto parts are injured or suffer property damage as a
result of purchasing the product, the Company could be subject
to product liability claims. In addition, the Company has some
exposure from radioactive scrap that could inadvertently end up
in mixed scrap shipped to consumers worldwide. The Company has
invested in radiation detection equipment. However the
possibility still exists of potential failure in detection. The
successful assertion of any such claim could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and
financial condition.
If
Chinese steel production substantially exceeds local demand, it
may result in the export of significant excess quantities of
steel products.
Chinese economic expansion has affected the availability and
increased the price volatility of recycled metal and steel
products. Expansions and contractions in the Chinese economy can
significantly affect the price of commodities used and sold by
the Company, as well as the price of finished steel products. If
expanding Chinese steel production significantly exceeds local
consumption, exports of steel products from China could
increase, resulting in lower volumes and selling prices for
SMBs steel products. Any resulting dislocations in foreign
markets may encourage importers to target the U.S. with
excess capacity at aggressive prices, and existing trade laws
and regulations may be inadequate to prevent unfair trade
practices, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The
Company is subject to environmental regulations and
environmental risks which could result in significant
environmental compliance costs and environmental
liability.
Compliance with environmental laws and regulations is a
significant factor in the Companys business. The Company
is subject to local, state and federal environmental laws and
regulations in the U.S. and other countries in relating to,
among other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
Waste disposal;
|
|
|
Air emissions;
|
|
|
Waste water and storm water management and treatment;
|
|
|
Soil and groundwater contamination remediation;
|
|
|
The discharge, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous
materials;
|
|
|
Employee health and safety.
|
The Company is also required to obtain environmental permits
from governmental authorities for certain operations. Violation
or failure to obtain permits or comply with these laws or
regulations, could result in the Company being fined or
otherwise sanctioned by regulators. The Companys
operations use and generate hazardous substances. In addition,
previous operations by others at facilities that are currently
or were formerly owned or operated by the Company or otherwise
used by the Company may have caused contamination from hazardous
substances. As a result, the Company is exposed to possible
claims under environmental laws and regulations, especially for
the remediation of waterways and soil or groundwater
contamination. These laws can impose liability for the
clean-up of
hazardous substances, even if the owner or operator was neither
aware of nor responsible for the release of the hazardous
substances. Although the Company believes that it is in material
compliance with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations, future environmental compliance costs may increase
because of new laws and regulations and changing interpretations
by regulatory authorities, uncertainty regarding adequate
16
pollution control levels, the future costs of pollution control
technology and issues related to global climate change.
Environmental compliance costs and potential environmental
liabilities could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Governmental
agencies may refuse to grant or renew the Companys
licenses and permits.
The Company must receive licenses, permits and approvals from
state and local governments to conduct certain of its operations
or to develop or acquire new facilities. Governmental agencies
often resist the establishment of certain types of facilities in
their communities, including auto parts facilities. In addition,
from time to time, both the U.S. and foreign governments
impose regulations and restrictions on trade in the markets in
which the Company operates. In some countries, governments can
require the Company to apply for certificates or registration
before allowing shipment of recycled metal to customers in those
countries. There can be no assurance that future approvals,
licenses and permits will be granted or that the Company will be
able to maintain and renew the approvals, licenses and permits
it currently holds, and failure to do so could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
There are currently no unresolved issues with respect to any SEC
staff written comments that were received 180 days or more
before the end of fiscal 2007 that relate to the Companys
periodic or current reports under the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934.
Corporate
Headquarters
The Companys executive offices are located at 3200 NW Yeon
Avenue in Portland, Oregon 97210, in approximately
31,000 sq. ft. of space, which was leased under a
long-term lease from Schnitzer Investment Corp.
(SIC), a related party, at August 31, 2007.
Refer to Note 16 Related Party Transactions, in
the notes to the consolidated financial statements, in
Part II, Item 8 of this report. SIC sold the building
to an unrelated third party in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
The Company also leases an additional 26,000 sq. ft. of
office space that is located one mile from its principal
executive offices under a long-term lease from a non-affiliated
third-party.
Metals
Recycling Business
At August 31, 2007, MRBs operations were conducted on
38 properties. Of these, seven served as collection facilities,
27 as collection and processing facilities, three are currently
inactive and in the process of relocation and
17
the remaining one is an export facility. Listed in the table
below are the facility locations by type, including their total
acreage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Acreage
|
|
Collection
|
|
|
|
|
Collection and Processing
|
|
|
Grants Pass, OR
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Anchorage, AK
|
|
|
18
|
|
Millbury, MA
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Attalla, AL
|
|
|
30
|
|
Manchester, NH
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Birmingham, AL
|
|
|
23
|
|
Portland, ME
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Selma, AL
|
|
|
22
|
|
Bainbridge, GA
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Fresno, CA
|
|
|
17
|
|
Pasco, WA
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Oakland, CA
|
|
|
33
|
|
Anchorage, AK
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA
|
|
|
13
|
|
Manchester, NH
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA(2)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartersville, GA
|
|
|
19
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gainesville, GA
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA (inactive)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Rossville, GA
|
|
|
11
|
|
Bainbridge, GA (inactive)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Kapolei, HI
|
|
|
6
|
|
Providence, RI (export facility)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Everett, MA
|
|
|
37
|
|
Chattanooga, TN (inactive)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Worcester, MA
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poplar-Sandquist, NH
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn, ME
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concord, NH
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claremont, NH
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madbury, NH
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bend, OR
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene, OR
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White City, OR
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnston, RI
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tacoma, WA
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acreage sub-total
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acreage
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The locations listed above are all owned by the Company, with
the exception of one of the Bainbridge, Georgia facilities; one
of the yards in Anchorage, Alaska; Madbury, New Hampshire;
Providence, Rhode Island; and a portion of the Eugene, Oregon
location, which are all leased from third parties. The lease on
the Madbury, New Hampshire facility has expired, and the Company
has exercised its option to purchase this property and is
working with the owner to consummate the purchase.
The Portland, Oregon; Oakland, California; Tacoma, Washington;
and Everett, Massachusetts collection and processing facilities
are located at major deep-water ports, which facilitate the
collection of unprocessed metal from suppliers and accommodate
bulk shipments and efficient distribution of processed recycled
metal to the U.S., Asia, the Mediterranean and other foreign
markets. The Company also leases an export marine shipping
facility in Providence, Rhode Island, near the Johnston, Rhode
Island processing facility, and has access to public docks in
Kapolei, Hawaii and Anchorage, Alaska.
18
Auto
Parts Business
APB has auto parts operations in the following locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Location
|
|
Stores
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Northern California
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company owns the properties located in Arizona, Indiana,
North Carolina and Nevada, and approximately 25 acres in
California, 12 acres in Florida, 10 acres in Texas,
6 acres in Illinois and 3 acres in Utah. The remaining
auto parts stores are located on sites leased by the Company.
Steel
Manufacturing Business
SMBs steel mill and administrative offices are located on
an 83-acre
site in McMinnville, Oregon owned by the Company. The Company
also owns an 87,000 sq. ft. distribution center in El
Monte, California and an additional 51 acres near the mill
site in McMinnville, Oregon; however, this latter site is not
currently utilized in SMB operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On October 16, 2006, the Company finalized settlements with
the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) resolving
an investigation related to a past practice of making improper
payments to the purchasing managers of the Companys
customers in Asia in connection with export sales of recycled
ferrous metal. Under the settlement, the Company agreed to a
deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ (the Deferred
Prosecution Agreement) and agreed to an order, issued by
the SEC, instituting
cease-and-desist
proceedings making findings and imposing a cease-and-desist
order pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act of 1934
(the Order). Under the Deferred Prosecution
Agreement, the DOJ will not prosecute the Company if the Company
meets the conditions of the agreement for a period of three
years including, among other things, that the Company engage a
compliance consultant to advise its compliance officer and Board
of Directors on the Companys compliance program. Under the
Order, the Company agreed to cease and desist from the past
practices that were the subject of the investigation and to
disgorge $8 million of profits and prejudgment interest.
The Order also contains provisions comparable to those in the
Deferred Prosecution Agreement regarding the engagement of the
compliance consultant. In addition, under the settlement, the
Companys Korean subsidiary, SSI International Far East,
Ltd., pled guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act anti-bribery
and books and records provisions, conspiracy and wire fraud
19
charges and paid a fine of $7 million. These amounts were
accrued during fiscal 2006 and paid in the first quarter of
fiscal 2007. The investigation settlement in the first quarter
of fiscal 2007 did not affect the Companys previously
reported financial results. Under the settlement, the Company
has agreed to cooperate fully with any ongoing, related DOJ and
SEC investigations.
The Company has incurred expenses, and may incur further
expenses, in connection with the advancement of funds to, or
indemnification of, individuals involved in such investigations.
Under the terms of its corporate bylaws, the Company is
obligated to indemnify all current and former officers or
directors involved in civil, criminal or investigative matters
in connection with their service. The Company is also obligated
to advance fees and expenses to such person in advance of a
final disposition of such matters, but only if the involved
officer or director affirms a good faith belief of entitlement
to indemnification and undertakes to repay such advance if it is
ultimately determined by a court that such person is not
entitled to be indemnified. The Company also has the option to
indemnify employees and to advance fees and expenses, but only
if the involved employees furnish the Company with the same
written affirmation and undertaking. There is no limit on the
indemnification payments the Company could be required to make
under these provisions. The Company did not record a liability
for these indemnification obligations based on the fact that
they are employment-related costs. At this time, the Company
does not believe that any indemnity payments the Company may be
required to make will be material.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various litigation
matters that arise in the normal course of business, involving
normal and routine claims. Environmental compliance issues
represent a significant portion of those claims. Management
currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these
proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations, cash flows or
business. For additional information regarding litigation to
which the Company is a party, which is incorporated into this
item, see Note 11 Commitment and Contingencies,
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in
Part II, Item 8 of this report.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders, during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 through the solicitation of
proxies or otherwise.
20
|
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
The Companys Class A Common Stock is a NASDAQ-listed
security traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC under the symbol
SCHN. There were 209 holders of record of Class A Common
Stock on October 11, 2007. The stock has been trading since
November 16, 1993. The following table sets forth the high
and low prices reported at the close of trading on the NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC and the dividends paid per share for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
|
Low Price
|
|
|
Dividends Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.19
|
|
|
$
|
30.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.93
|
|
|
$
|
33.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.18
|
|
|
$
|
35.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64.38
|
|
|
$
|
46.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
|
Low Price
|
|
|
Dividends Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35.15
|
|
|
$
|
28.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35.49
|
|
|
$
|
29.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.00
|
|
|
$
|
30.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.69
|
|
|
$
|
30.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.017
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys Class B Common Stock is not publicly
traded. There were 13 holders of record of Class B Common
Stock as of October 11, 2007.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Pursuant to a share repurchase program as amended in 2001 and in
October 2006, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to
6.0 million shares of its Class A Common stock when
management deems such repurchases to be appropriate. Prior to
fiscal 2007, the Company had repurchased 1.3 million shares
under the program. In fiscal 2007, the Company repurchased a
total of 2.5 million shares under this program, leaving
2.2 million shares available for repurchase.
The share repurchase program does not require the Company to
acquire any specific number of shares, may be suspended,
extended or terminated by the Company at any time without prior
notice and may be executed through open-market purchases,
privately negotiated transactions or utilizing
Rule 10b5-1
programs. Management evaluates long- and short-range forecasts
as well as anticipated sources and uses of cash before
determining the course of action that would best enhance
shareholder value.
21
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company
repurchased 1.0 million shares in open-market transactions
at a cost of $54 million. The table below presents a
summary of share repurchases made by the Company during the
quarter ended August 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
of Shares that may
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
yet be Purchased
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
June 1, 2007 June 30, 2007
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,159,790
|
|
July 1, 2007 July 31, 2007
|
|
|
97,777
|
|
|
$
|
54.94
|
|
|
|
97,777
|
|
|
|
3,062,013
|
|
August 1, 2007 August 31, 2007
|
|
|
902,223
|
|
|
$
|
53.62
|
|
|
|
902,223
|
|
|
|
2,159,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Graph
The following graph compares cumulative total shareholder return
on the Companys Class A Common Stock for the
five-year period from September 1, 2002 through
August 31, 2007 with the cumulative total return for the
same period of (i) the S&P 500 Index, (ii) the
S&P Steel Index and (iii) the NASDAQ Composite Index.
These comparisons assume an investment of $100 at the
commencement of the period and that all dividends are
reinvested. The stock performance outlined in the performance
graph below is not necessarily indicative of the Companys
future performance, and the Company does not endorse any
predictions as to future stock performance.
22
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(6)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share and dividend data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,572,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,854,715
|
|
|
$
|
853,078
|
|
|
$
|
688,220
|
|
|
$
|
496,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
213,563
|
|
|
$
|
175,064
|
|
|
$
|
231,071
|
|
|
$
|
166,880
|
|
|
$
|
68,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interests and
pre-acquisition interests
|
|
$
|
208,965
|
|
|
$
|
231,689
|
|
|
$
|
230,886
|
|
|
$
|
164,326
|
|
|
$
|
66,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
75,333
|
|
|
$
|
86,871
|
|
|
$
|
81,522
|
|
|
$
|
50,669
|
|
|
$
|
17,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
131,334
|
|
|
$
|
143,068
|
|
|
$
|
146,867
|
|
|
$
|
111,181
|
|
|
$
|
43,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
4.38
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.83
|
|
|
$
|
3.71
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
4.32
|
|
|
$
|
4.65
|
|
|
$
|
4.72
|
|
|
$
|
3.58
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
$
|
0.067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments (in
thousands)(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled ferrous metal-processed (tons)
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled ferrous metal-traded
(tons)(5)
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled nonferrous metal (pounds)
|
|
|
383,086
|
|
|
|
301,610
|
|
|
|
125,745
|
|
|
|
117,992
|
|
|
|
113,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished steel products (tons)
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average net selling
price(2,3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled ferrous metal (per ton)
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled nonferrous metal (per pound)
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished steel products (per ton)
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of auto parts
stores(4)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
269,287
|
|
|
$
|
287,606
|
|
|
$
|
125,878
|
|
|
$
|
73,094
|
|
|
$
|
72,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,410
|
|
|
$
|
25,356
|
|
|
$
|
20,645
|
|
|
$
|
11,307
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,151,414
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,724
|
|
|
$
|
709,458
|
|
|
$
|
605,973
|
|
|
$
|
487,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
$
|
124,079
|
|
|
$
|
102,829
|
|
|
$
|
7,724
|
|
|
$
|
67,801
|
|
|
$
|
87,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
765,064
|
|
|
$
|
734,099
|
|
|
$
|
579,528
|
|
|
$
|
418,880
|
|
|
$
|
302,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The 2003 data includes the APB
acquisition, which occurred on February 14, 2003. The
consolidated results include the results of APB as though the
acquisition had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2003.
Adjustments have been made for minority interests, which
represent the ownership interests the Company did not own during
the reporting period, and pre-acquisition interests, which
represents the share of income attributable to the former joint
venture partner for the period from September 1, 2002
through February 14, 2003.
|
(2)
|
|
Tons for recycled ferrous metal are
long tons (2,240 pounds) and for finished steel products are
short tons (2000 pounds).
|
|
(3)
|
|
In accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, the Company reports revenues
that include shipping costs billed to customers, however,
average net selling prices are shown net of shipping costs.
|
(4)
|
|
During fiscal 2006, the Company
acquired GreenLeaf, which added 22 full-service auto parts
store, of which five were converted to self-service during
fiscal 2006. See Note 7 Business Combinations,
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in
Part II, Item 8 of this report.
|
(5)
|
|
As a result of the HNC separation
and termination agreement, the Company acquired the assets of
Global Trading business Baltic region from HNC. Refer to
Note 7 Business Combinations, in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this report.
|
(6)
|
|
The 2006 data includes the joint
ventures acquired as a result of the HNC separation and
termination agreement, in addition to the acquisition of the
remaining minority interest in MRL. The consolidated results
include the results of PNE and MRL as though the acquisition had
occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2006. Adjustments have been
made for minority interests, which represent the ownership
interests the Company did not own during the reporting period,
and pre-acquisition interest, which represents the share of
income attributable to the former joint venture partners in PNE
and MRL for the period from September 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2005.
|
23
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
This section includes a discussion of the Companys
operations for the three fiscal years ended August 31,
2007. The following discussion and analysis provides information
which management believes is relevant to an assessment and
understanding of the Companys results of operations and
financial condition. This discussion may contain forward looking
statements that anticipate results based on managements
plans that are subject to uncertainty. The discussion should be
read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and the related notes thereto, and the Selected Financial Data
and Operating Statistics contained elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
Business
The Company operates in three reportable segments: MRB, APB and
SMB. MRB purchases, collects, processes and recycles steel and
other metal through its facilities and trades and brokers scrap
metal. APB purchases used and salvaged vehicles and sells
serviceable used auto parts through its self-service and
full-service auto parts stores. APB is also a supplier of
autobodies to MRB, which processes the autobodies into saleable
recycled metal. SMB purchases recycled metal from MRB and uses
its mini-mill near Portland, Oregon, to melt recycled metal to
produce finished steel products. SMB also maintains mill depots
in Central and Southern California. The Company provides an end
of life cycle solution for a variety of products through its
integrated businesses, including resale of used auto parts,
processing autobodies and other metal products and manufacturing
scrap metal into finished steel products.
The Companys results of operations depend in large part on
demand and prices for recycled metal in global markets and steel
products in the Western U.S. The Companys deep water
port facilities on both the West and East coasts of the
U.S. and in Hawaii allow the Company to take advantage of
the increasing demand for recycled metal by steel manufacturers
located in Europe, Asia, Mexico and the Mediterranean. The
Companys processing facilities in the Southeastern
U.S. also provide access to the growing automobile and
steel manufacturing industries in that region. Market prices for
recycled ferrous and nonferrous metal fluctuate periodically,
but have generally increased over the past three years. These
higher prices have a significant impact on the results of
operations for MRB and, to a lesser extent, for APB.
Key factors and trends affecting the industries in which
the Company operates and its results of operations
The following key factors and trends affect the industries in
which the Company operates: competition, consolidation in the
scrap metal industry and the steel industry, fragmentation of
the auto parts industry and volatility in price and sales volume
decreases in the metals recycling industry. The following key
factors and trends specifically affect the Companys
results of operations: the integration of acquired businesses,
foreign business risks, replacement or installation of capital
equipment, reliance on key pieces of equipment, geographic
concentration, union relationships and pension and
postretirement benefits. The foregoing key factors and trends
are discussed elsewhere in this annual report.
Executive
Overview
The Company completed another successful year in fiscal 2007,
achieving record sales levels for the sixth consecutive year.
The Company generated consolidated revenues of $2.6 billion
for fiscal 2007, an increase of $718 million, or 39%, from
$1.9 billion in fiscal 2006. Consolidated operating income
for fiscal 2007 increased $39 million, or 22%, from
$175 million in fiscal 2006 to $214 million in fiscal
2007. The increase in revenues was generated from all segments,
while the increase in operating income was driven primarily from
the improved financial results of MRB. Net income for fiscal
2007 was $131 million, a decrease of $12 million, or
8% compared to the prior year net income of $143 million.
Diluted net income per share for the year was $4.32, a 7%
decrease from fiscal 2006. Net income in fiscal 2006 included a
$35 million gain (net of tax) from the separation and
termination of the HNC joint ventures, which was partially
offset by a $15 million charge related to the SEC and DOJ
investigations into the Companys past payment practices in
Asia.
In fiscal 2007, MRB increased its revenues of by
$682 million, or 49%, to $2.1 billion from
$1.4 billion in fiscal 2006. The increase included a
$550 million increase in ferrous revenues, or 49%, to
$1.7 billion and a $129 million
24
increase in nonferrous revenues, or 48%, to $396 million.
The increase in ferrous revenues was driven by a 21% increase in
sales tons and a 22% increase in average net sales price. The
increase in nonferrous revenues was driven by a 27% increase in
sales tons and a 17% increase in average net sales price.
Operating income for MRB was $166 million, or 8% of
revenues in fiscal 2007, compared to $128 million, or 9% of
revenues in fiscal 2006. The increase in operating income
reflects the impact of the higher sales volume and prices. While
the majority of the higher material costs were recovered through
the higher net sales prices discussed above, the additional
volume resulted in operating income being reduced as a percent
of sales. Further offsetting the increases in average sales
prices and volume was a $30 million increase in SG&A
expenses compared to the prior year, primarily due to
$21 million of higher compensation costs as a result of
increased headcount, bonuses, and share-based compensation
expense and a $5 million increase in allocated ERP and
other information technology costs.
In fiscal 2007, APB increased its revenues by $48 million,
or 22%, to $266 million from $218 million in fiscal
2006. The increase included a $10 million increase in core
revenue, or 35%, over the prior year; a $13 million
increase in scrap vehicle revenue, or 38%, from the self-service
stores over the prior year; and a $22 million increase in
full-service revenue over the prior year. The increase in core
revenue was primarily due to a $22 increase in the average core
sales per car and a 32,000 increase in cars crushed. The
increase in scrap vehicle revenue was due to a $41 increase in
the average scrap sales price per car and a 21,000 increase in
tons shipped. The increase in full-service revenue was due to
higher parts sales across several product types and as a result
of a full year of revenues for GreenLeaf, which was acquired
during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Operating income for
APB was $29 million, or 11% of revenue in fiscal 2007,
compared to $28 million, or 13% of revenues in fiscal 2006.
The slight increase in operating income for fiscal 2007 reflects
the impact of higher sales volume and prices. While the majority
of the higher car costs were recovered through the higher sales
prices discussed above, the additional volume resulted in
operating income being reduced as a percent of revenue. The
increases in operating income were further offset by a
$7 million increase in SG&A expenses compared to the
prior year, primarily attributable to a $6 million increase
in allocated ERP and other information technology costs and a
$2 million increase in compensation expenses.
In fiscal 2007, SMB increased its revenues by $38 million,
or 10%, to $425 million from $387 million in fiscal
2006. The increase over the prior year was the result of higher
average net sales prices for finished steel products, due in
part to strong demand, increased sales volumes and an improved
product mix. Sales volumes increased 10,000 tons, or 1%, to
713,000 tons in fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. The
average net selling price increased $47 per ton, or 9%, to $575
per ton in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 and resulted in
increased revenues of $34 million. Operating income for SMB
was $64 million, or 15% of revenues in fiscal 2007,
compared to $75 million, or 19% of revenues in fiscal 2006.
The decrease in operating income was primarily the result of
higher raw material costs and higher conversion costs, which
could not be passed through to SMBs customers through
higher prices.
Also during fiscal 2007, the Company repurchased
2.5 million shares, or approximately 8% of total shares
outstanding for a total cost of $110 million under the
authority granted by its Board of Directors.
Business Acquisitions
The Company intends to continue to focus on growth through
value-creating acquisitions and will pursue acquisition
opportunities it believes will create shareholder value and earn
after-tax income in excess of its cost of capital. With the
Companys continued strong balance sheet, cash flows from
operations and available borrowing capacity, the Company
believes it is in an attractive position to continue to complete
reasonably priced acquisitions fitting the Companys
long-term strategic plans.
In fiscal 2007, the Company completed the following acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2006, the Company acquired a metals recycling
business to provide additional sources of scrap metals for the
mega-shredder in Everett, Massachusetts.
|
|
|
In May 2007, the Company acquired two metals recycling
businesses that separately provide scrap metal to the Everett,
Massachusetts and Tacoma, Washington facilities.
|
These acquisitions were not material to the Companys
financial position or results of operations, as the combined
assets of these business acquisitions amounted to
$10 million, or 1% of consolidated total assets, as of
August 31, 2007 and their combined revenues amounted to
$25 million, or 1% of consolidated revenues, for fiscal
2007.
25
The Company completed the following significant transactions in
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
On September 30, 2005 the Company completed the separation
and termination of its metals recycling joint ventures with HNC.
|
|
|
On September 30, 2005, the Company acquired GreenLeaf and
five store properties leased by GreenLeaf and assumed certain
GreenLeaf liabilities. GreenLeaf is engaged in the business of
auto dismantling and recycling and sells its products primarily
to collision and mechanical repair shops.
|
|
|
On October 31, 2005, the Company purchased substantially
all the assets of Regional. The Company now operates nine metals
recycling facilities located in Georgia and Alabama, focused on
both ferrous and nonferrous metals.
|
|
|
On March 21, 2006, the Company purchased the minority
interest in its MRL subsidiary. The Company assumed control of
the MRL operations upon the separation and termination of its
joint venture with HNC. MRL operates a metals recycling facility
in Rhode Island.
|
See Note 7 - Business Combinations, in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this report.
26
Results
of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 vs 2006
|
|
2006 vs 2005
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling
Business(1)
|
|
$
|
2,089,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,783
|
|
|
$
|
580,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49%
|
|
142%
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
266,354
|
|
|
|
218,130
|
|
|
|
107,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
102%
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
424,550
|
|
|
|
386,610
|
|
|
|
315,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
23%
|
Intercompany revenue eliminations
|
|
|
(207,910
|
)
|
|
|
(156,808
|
)
|
|
|
(150,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
2,572,265
|
|
|
|
1,854,715
|
|
|
|
853,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39%
|
|
117%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods
Sold(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling
Business(1)
|
|
|
1,850,597
|
|
|
|
1,235,151
|
|
|
|
450,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
174%
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
181,859
|
|
|
|
141,741
|
|
|
|
64,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
121%
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
353,810
|
|
|
|
306,849
|
|
|
|
268,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
14%
|
Intercompany cost of goods eliminations
|
|
|
(208,153
|
)
|
|
|
(156,751
|
)
|
|
|
(150,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
|
2,178,113
|
|
|
|
1,526,990
|
|
|
|
633,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43%
|
|
141%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling
Business(1)
|
|
|
78,516
|
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
17,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63%
|
|
171%
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
55,445
|
|
|
|
48,055
|
|
|
|
15,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
208%
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
6,385
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
27%
|
Corporate(3)
|
|
|
45,684
|
|
|
|
55,693
|
|
|
|
20,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18%)
|
|
168%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SG&A Expense
|
|
|
186,030
|
|
|
|
156,862
|
|
|
|
58,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
170%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling
Business(1)
|
|
|
165,599
|
|
|
|
127,689
|
|
|
|
111,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
14%
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
29,050
|
|
|
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
28,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
1%
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
64,355
|
|
|
|
74,791
|
|
|
|
42,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14%)
|
|
75%
|
Joint
Ventures(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
69,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income
|
|
|
259,004
|
|
|
|
230,814
|
|
|
|
252,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
(8%)
|
Corporate expense
|
|
|
(45,684
|
)
|
|
|
(55,693
|
)
|
|
|
(20,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18%)
|
|
168%
|
Intercompany (profit) loss
elimination(4)
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(526%)
|
|
(69%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$
|
213,563
|
|
|
$
|
175,064
|
|
|
$
|
231,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
(24%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Company elected to consolidate
the results of two of the businesses acquired through the HNC
separation and termination agreement as though the transaction
had occurred at the beginning of the 2006 fiscal year instead of
the date of acquisition. The increases in revenues and operating
income that resulted from the election were offset in the
Statement of Income by pre-acquisition interests, net of tax.
See Note 7 - Business Combinations in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8
of this report.
|
(2)
|
|
As a result of the HNC joint
venture separation and termination agreement, the Joint Venture
segment was eliminated and the results for the two entities
acquired in this transaction, in which the Company had a
previous interest, and all remaining Joint Ventures were
consolidated into MRB as of the beginning of fiscal 2006. The
Company determined that retroactively adjusting prior period
results for entities acquired in this transaction is not
meaningful given that the Company was a 50% partner and was not
involved in managing the day-to-day operations of these entities
prior to the separation.
|
(3)
|
|
Corporate expense consists
primarily of unallocated corporate expenses for services that
benefit all three business segments. Because of this unallocated
expense, the operating income of each segment does not reflect
the operating income the segment would have as a stand-alone
business.
|
(4)
|
|
Recycled ferrous metal sales from
MRB to SMB and autobody sales from APB to MRB are made at
negotiated rates per ton that are intended to approximate market
prices. Consequently, these intercompany revenues produce
intercompany operating income, which is not recognized until the
finished products are sold to third parties.
|
(5)
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold balances
disclosed above include amounts for environmental matters
separately stated on the Consolidated Statements of Income. See
part II, Item 8 of this report.
|
Revenues
Consolidated revenues for fiscal 2007 increased
$718 million, or 39%, to $2.6 billion from
$1.9 billion in fiscal 2006. Revenues in fiscal 2007
increased for all Company business segments. The increase was
primarily the result of higher
27
volumes in all business segments due to the Companys focus
on increasing throughput, the added volumes from a full year of
operations for the acquisitions made in fiscal 2006 and
increases in the market price of scrap and steel.
Consolidated revenues for fiscal 2006 increased
$1.0 billion, or 117%, to $1.9 billion from
$853 million in fiscal 2005. Revenues increased as a result
of the acquisitions made in the MRB and APB reporting segments
in fiscal 2006 and an increase in production from SMB.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Consolidated cost of goods sold increased $651 million, or
43%, to $2.2 billion for fiscal 2007, compared to the prior
year. Cost of goods sold in fiscal 2007 increased for all
business segments, primarily resulting from increased material
prices and increases due to a full year of operations for the
acquisitions made in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of revenues,
cost of goods sold increased from 82% in fiscal 2006 to 85% in
fiscal 2007.
Consolidated cost of goods sold increased $893 million, or
141%, to $1.5 billion for fiscal 2006 compared to the prior
year. As a percentage of revenues, cost of goods sold increased
from 74% in fiscal 2005 to 82% in fiscal 2006 mainly as a result
of acquisitions that occurred during fiscal 2006.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
SG&A expense increased $29 million, or 19%, to
$186 million for fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year.
The $29 million increase over fiscal 2006 was due to higher
SG&A expense incurred at each of the reporting segments,
totaling $39 million combined, which was partially offset
by a $10 million decrease at Corporate. These increases at
the reporting segments were primarily attributable to an
increase in compensation expense of $22 million due to
increased headcount, bonuses and share-based compensation
expense recognized for fiscal 2007, a $12 million increase
related to higher allocated information technology costs as a
result of the implementation and maintenance of an enterprise
resource planning (ERP) software application,
including related hardware upgrades and support, and other
information technology costs. The net decrease at Corporate over
the prior year was due primarily to the $15 million charge
in fiscal 2006 associated with the establishment of a reserve
related to the penalties that the Company estimated would be
imposed by the DOJ and the SEC in connection with the
investigation into the Companys past payment practices in
Asia as discussed in Note 11 Commitments and
Contingencies in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. The net
decrease at Corporate for fiscal 2007 included an
$8 million increase in compensation costs resulting from
increased headcount, bonus and share-based compensation expense.
SG&A expenses increased $99 million, or 170%, to
$157 million for fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year.
These increases were primarily attributable to a
$55 million increase in SG&A expenses from the
businesses acquired in fiscal 2006 and a $15 million
increase in costs associated with the DOJ and the SEC
investigation, as discussed in Note 11
Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this
report. In addition, there were increases of $7 million in
contract labor, legal and accounting fees, an increase of
$7 million in compensation costs and a $3 million
increase in share-based compensation expense recognized in
fiscal 2006.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense was $8 million, $3 million and
$1 million for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The increase from fiscal 2006 to 2007 reflects higher average
interest rates and the Company carrying higher average debt
balances during fiscal 2007 in order to complete and integrate
acquisitions, as well as to support the increased level of
working capital for the operations of these acquisitions, in
addition to $110 million related to share repurchases. For
more information about the Companys outstanding debt
balances, see Note 10 Long-Term Debt, in the
notes to the consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this report. The increase from fiscal 2005 to
fiscal 2006 was the result of higher average interest rates and
the Company carrying higher average debt balances.
28
Other
Income, Net of Interest Expense
Other income was $4 million, $60 million and
$1 million for fiscal, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
During fiscal 2006, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of
$57 million that arose from the HNC separation and
termination agreement, based on the difference between the
excess values of businesses acquired over the carrying value of
the businesses sold. For a more detailed discussion of the HNC
joint venture separation and termination agreement, see
Note 7 Business Combinations, in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this report.
Income
Tax Expense
The tax rates were 36.1%, 37.5% and 35.3% for fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively. The tax rate in fiscal 2006 was higher
than in fiscal 2007 primarily because of an accrual recorded in
fiscal 2006 of $14 million for nondeductible penalties and
profits disgorgement expensed in connection with the settlement
of the SEC and DOJ investigation (see Item 3 Legal
Proceedings). The nondeductible expense increased the fiscal
2006 tax rate by 2.1%. In addition, the fiscal 2006 tax rate was
higher than normal because it included an estimated tax rate of
38.0% for the non-recurring $57 million gain arising from
the HNC separation and termination (see Note 7 -
Business Combinations, in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this
report), that was higher than the rate applicable to the
Companys recurring income. The 36.1% fiscal 2007 tax rate
was comprised of the 35.0% federal statutory rate, a 1.5%
effective state rate and 1.5% for nondeductible officers
compensation, offset by a 1.9% benefit from a Section 199
manufacturing deduction and the Extraterritorial Income
Exclusion benefit on export sales.
Financial
results by segment
The Company operates its business across three reportable
segments: MRB, APB and SMB. Additional financial information
relating to these business segments is contained in
Note 17 - Segment Information, in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8
of this report.
29
Metals
Recycling Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Year Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007 vs 2006
|
|
|
2006 vs 2005
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for prices)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrous Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
$
|
1,300,787
|
|
|
$
|
801,224
|
|
|
$
|
488,206
|
|
|
|
62%
|
|
|
|
64%
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
381,066
|
|
|
|
330,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Nonferrous revenues
|
|
|
395,737
|
|
|
|
266,773
|
|
|
|
70,747
|
|
|
|
48%
|
|
|
|
277%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11,681
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
21,194
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
(60%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
2,089,271
|
|
|
|
1,406,783
|
|
|
|
580,147
|
|
|
|
49%
|
|
|
|
142%
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,850,597
|
|
|
|
1,235,151
|
|
|
|
450,652
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
174%
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
78,516
|
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
17,792
|
|
|
|
63%
|
|
|
|
171%
|
|
(Income) from joint ventures(2)
|
|
|
(5,441
|
)
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
165,599
|
|
|
$
|
127,689
|
|
|
$
|
111,703
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Ferrous Sales Prices ($/LT)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Export
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
(10%
|
)
|
Average for all processing
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
(7%
|
)
|
Trading
|
|
$
|
279
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Ferrous Processing Sales Volume (LT, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
Other Domestic
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
705%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Domestic
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
73%
|
|
Export
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
79%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total processed ferrous
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
76%
|
|
Ferrous Trading Sales Volumes (LT, in thousands)
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5%
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ferrous Sales Volume (LT, in thousands)
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
|
4,561
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
145%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Nonferrous Sales Price ($/pound)
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
55%
|
|
Nonferrous Sales Volumes (pounds, in thousands)
|
|
|
383,086
|
|
|
|
301,610
|
|
|
|
125,745
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
140%
|
|
Outbound freight included in revenues
|
|
$
|
219,382
|
|
|
$
|
139,258
|
|
|
$
|
59,336
|
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
|
135%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Price information is shown after
excluding the cost of freight incurred to deliver the product to
the customer.
|
|
(2)
|
|
As a result of the HNC joint
venture separation and termination agreement, the Joint Venture
segment was eliminated and the results for the two entities
acquired in this transaction, in which the Company had a
previous interest, and all remaining Joint Ventures were
consolidated into MRB as of the beginning of fiscal 2006. The
Company determined that retroactively adjusting prior period
results for entities acquired in this transaction is not
meaningful given that the Company was a 50% partner and was not
involved in managing the day-to-day operations of these entities
prior to the separation.
|
30
Fiscal
2007 compared with fiscal 2006
Revenues
MRB generated revenues of $2.1 billion for fiscal 2007
before intercompany eliminations, an increase of
$682 million, or 49%, over fiscal 2006. The increase was
primarily attributable to increased sales volumes as a result of
the focus on increasing throughput at its processing facilities
and prevailing market conditions whereby scrap metal demand was
higher than supply, resulting in higher average net selling
prices and higher sales volumes. Outbound freight costs, which,
are included in the gross sales price, increased by 58% to
$219 million for fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006,
primarily due to increased volumes and higher ocean freight
rates.
Ferrous revenues increased $550 million, or 49%, to
$1.7 billion during fiscal, 2007 compared to the prior
year. The increase in ferrous revenues was driven by both higher
average net sales prices and increased volumes. The average net
sales price for ferrous processing increased $48 per ton, or 22%
from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007. The average net sales price for
ferrous trading increased $53 per ton, or 23%, in fiscal 2007,
compared to fiscal 2006.
Ferrous processing sales volume increased by 1.0 million
tons, or 30%, to 4.3 million tons in fiscal 2007 compared
to fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily the result of the
strategy to increase the volume of metal purchases and maximize
throughput, which was accomplished through continued
acquisitions of metal recyclers and increased purchases of
ferrous materials. Ferrous trading sales volume remained fairly
consistent at 1.2 million tons for both fiscal 2007 and
2006. Other domestic sales volume increased 38% to 722,000 tons
in fiscal 2007, primarily as a result of the Regional
acquisition made during fiscal 2006.
Nonferrous revenues increased $129 million, or 48%, to
$396 million for fiscal 2007 compared to the same period
last year. The increase in nonferrous revenues was driven by
both higher average net sales prices and increased volume. The
average net sales price increased $0.15, or 17%, to $1.02 per
pound for fiscal 2007 over fiscal 2006. The increase in sales
price per pound was the result of an improved product mix due to
Regional and other acquisitions and increased Asian demand for
nonferrous metals. Nonferrous pounds shipped increased
81 million pounds, or 27%, to nearly 383 million
pounds for fiscal 2007, compared to the prior year. The increase
in pounds shipped was primarily due to improvement in the
recovery of nonferrous materials processed through the new
mega-shredders, which have state of the art back-end sorting
systems and the higher overall volume being processed.
Segment
Operating Income
Operating income for MRB was $166 million, or 8% of
revenues in fiscal 2007, compared to $128 million, or 9% of
revenues, in fiscal 2006. The increase in operating income
reflects the impact of the higher sales volume and the improved
performance discussed above, partially offset by higher raw
material costs, which increased on average 23%, over fiscal
2006. While the majority of the higher material cost was
recovered through the higher net sales prices discussed above,
operating income was reduced as a percent of revenues. Further
offsetting the increases in average sales prices and volume was
a $30 million increase in SG&A expenses compared to
the prior year, primarily due to $21 million of higher
compensation costs as a result of increased headcount, bonuses,
and share-based compensation expense and a $5 million
increase in allocated ERP and other information technology costs.
Fiscal
2006 compared with fiscal 2005
MRB generated revenues of $1.4 billion for fiscal 2006,
before intercompany eliminations, an increase of
$827 million, or 142% over fiscal 2005. Ferrous revenues
increased $643 million, or 132% over fiscal 2005, primarily
due to acquisition-related volume increases, which were
partially offset by the decrease in the average net selling
price for ferrous metal in fiscal 2006. Nonferrous revenues
increased $196 million, or 277%, over fiscal 2005,
primarily as a result of increased sales generated by the
acquired entities and an increase of $0.31 per pound, or 55%, in
the average nonferrous sales price. Operating income for MRB was
$128 million, or 9% of revenues, in fiscal 2006, compared
to $112 million, or 19% of revenues, in fiscal 2005. The
$16 million increase in operating income was directly
related to the increase in sales volume as a result of entities
acquired in fiscal 2006.
31
Outlook
Demand for recycled ferrous metal is driven by world wide steel
making capacity. In recent years, steel making capacity has
increased significantly, primarily in the developing economies
of the Middle-East and Asia. Due to this increased capacity, the
demand for recycled metal has increased while at the same time
the supply of metal available for recycling has not kept pace.
As a result, prices for recycled metals have increased to levels
higher than experienced in previous economic cycles. The Company
believes these fundamentals will remain in the place for fiscal
2008, and while prices will continue to remain volatile, the
general level of prices will be consistent with fiscal 2007.
To better take advantage of the positive markets in which it
operates, MRB has made significant investments in the past two
fiscal years to upgrade its equipment and infrastructure. MRB
believes these investments will enable it to increase its
capacity to process recycled metal, increase the extraction of
higher value materials and improve overall operating efficiency.
The additional capacity and improved efficiencies support
MRBs efforts to seek additional sources of supply and
increase the throughput at its processing facilities. Due to the
strong demand described above, the competition for recycled
metal has been increasing, and MRB expects its efforts to
maintain and increase the supply of recycled material it is able
to purchase from suppliers could result in higher prices for
those inputs. Nonetheless, MRB believes the size, breadth and
efficiency of its operations provide it with a competitive
advantage in procuring raw material and will allow it to
continue to grow the volume of material available for sale into
the world markets during fiscal 2008.
MRB also believes its access to deep water ports provide it with
an efficient platform for exporting recycled metals to customers
in Asia, the Middle East and around the world. MRB utilizes
ocean going vessels to access these markets and the demand for
vessels of the size and type required by MRB has been
increasing. Historically, any change in the cost of shipping has
been reflected in the price paid by customers for the metals
being delivered. However, toward the end of fiscal 2007, the
cost of shipping began to rise significantly, and while MRB
believes the historical relationship between the prices for
recycled metal and the cost of shipping the product to customers
in Asia and elsewhere will remain consistent, rapid changes in
shipping costs may result in margin pressures during fiscal 2008.
Auto
Parts Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase/(Decrease)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007 vs 2006
|
|
2006 vs 2005
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
266,354
|
|
|
$
|
218,130
|
|
|
$
|
107,808
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
102%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
181,859
|
|
|
|
141,741
|
|
|
|
64,136
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
121%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
55,445
|
|
|
|
48,055
|
|
|
|
15,592
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
208%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
29,050
|
|
|
$
|
28,334
|
|
|
$
|
28,080
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007 compared with fiscal 2006
Revenues
APB generated revenues of $266 million for fiscal 2007,
before intercompany eliminations, an increase of
$48 million, or 22%, over fiscal 2006. The increase over
the prior year was primarily driven by increased sales of
scrapped vehicles and cores, higher average sales prices and
higher sales volume. Core revenue increased $10 million, or
35%, over the prior year, primarily due to a $22 increase in the
average core sales per car and an increase of 32,000 cars
crushed. Scrap vehicle revenue from the self-service business
increased $13 million, or 38%, over the prior year,
resulting from a $41 increase in the average scrap sales price
per car and an increase in volume of 21,000 tons shipped. In
addition, full-service revenue increased $22 million over
the prior year due to higher parts sales across several product
types and as a result of a full year of revenues for the
GreenLeaf full-service business, which was acquired during the
first quarter of fiscal 2006. During fiscal 2007, APB also
benefited from the improved revenue contribution of the five
stores converted from full-service to self-service compared to
the same period last year.
32
Segment
Operating Income
Operating income for APB was $29 million, or 11% of
revenues, in fiscal 2007, compared to $28 million, or 13%
of revenues, in fiscal 2006. The slight increase in operating
income for fiscal 2007 reflects the impact of higher sales
volume and improved performance at the full-service stores,
offset by higher raw material costs, which increased $49 per
car, or 35%, over fiscal 2006. Scrap tons sold increased 40,000
tons, or 14%, from 282,000 for fiscal 2006 to 322,000 for fiscal
2007. The increases in operating income were further offset by a
$7 million increase in SG&A expenses compared to the
prior year, primarily attributable to a $6 million increase
in allocated ERP and other information technology costs and a
$2 million increase in compensation expenses.
Fiscal
2006 compared with fiscal 2005
APB generated revenues of $218 million for fiscal 2006,
before intercompany eliminations, an increase of
$110 million, or 102%, over fiscal 2005. The increase in
revenues was primarily attributable to $90 million of
revenues generated from the GreenLeaf acquisition that occurred
during fiscal 2006. Operating income for APB was
$28 million, or 13% of revenues in fiscal 2006, compared to
operating income of $28 million, or 26% of revenue, for
fiscal 2005. The decrease in margins primarily attributable to
APBs entry into the full-service used parts market, which
has higher costs associated with the purchase and removal of
parts sold through the full-service distribution model, and
increased demand and competition for unprocessed metals, which
increased the costs for the purchase of cars in the self-service
distribution model.
Outlook
APB operates two distribution channels in the used auto parts
industry. The first, self-service auto parts, is primarily
focused on older, end-of-life vehicles. Self-service revenues
are driven by admissions and parts sales as well as wholesale
revenues from the sale of cores and scrapped vehicles. APB
remains committed to increasing its purchases of scrapped
vehicles and believes that the increased volume should result in
higher revenues from the sale of cores and scrap in fiscal 2008.
Demand in APBs second distribution channel, full-service
used auto parts, is driven primarily by the professional repair
market. APBs strategy has been to increase both the
quantity and quality of its inventory by utilizing computer
buying models that focus on acquiring used autos that contain
high demand parts, which it believes will enable it to increase
sales in its full-service distribution channel in fiscal 2008.
Steel
Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase/(Decrease)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007 vs 2006
|
|
2006 vs 2005
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
424,550
|
|
|
$
|
386,610
|
|
|
$
|
315,476
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
23%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
353,810
|
|
|
|
306,849
|
|
|
|
268,913
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
14%
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
6,385
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
64,355
|
|
|
$
|
74,791
|
|
|
$
|
42,661
|
|
|
|
(14)%
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price
($/ton)(1)
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
3%
|
Finished steel products sold (tons, in thousands)
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Price information is shown after
excluding the cost of freight incurred to deliver the product to
the customer.
|
Fiscal
2007 compared with fiscal 2006
Revenues
SMB generated revenues of $425 million for fiscal 2007,
before intercompany eliminations, an increase of
$38 million, or 10%, over fiscal 2006. The increase over
the prior year was the result of higher average net sales prices
for finished steel products, due in part to strong demand,
increased sales volume and an improved product
33
mix. Sales volume increased 10,000 tons, or 1%, to 713,000 tons
in fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year. The average net
selling price increased $47 per ton, or 9%, to $575 per ton in
fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 and resulted in increased
revenues of $34 million.
Segment
Operating Income
Operating income for SMB was $64 million, or 15% of
revenues, in fiscal 2007, compared to $75 million, or 19%
of revenues, in fiscal 2006. The decrease in operating income
reflects the impact of a 20% increase in the cost of scrap
metal, which outpaced the 9% increase in average sales price per
ton, an increase of $17 per ton in conversion costs, primarily
related to higher costs for raw materials, other than scrap
metals and $3 million in costs associated with the planned
shut down of the larger rolling mill in the third quarter of
fiscal 2007. SMB acquired all of its scrap metal requirements
from MRB at negotiated rates intended to approximate market
prices.
Fiscal
2006 compared with fiscal 2005
SMB generated revenues of $387 million in fiscal 2006,
before intercompany eliminations, an increase of
$71 million, or 23%, over fiscal 2005. The increase in
revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in the number
of tons sold of 108,000 tons, or 18%, and an increase of $16 per
ton in the average net selling price in fiscal 2006 over fiscal
2005. The increase in sales volume was primarily due to
increased demand from customers and capital improvements by SMB
that enabled the steel mill to increase output to meet the
demand. The average net selling price increased as a result of
increased worldwide steel consumption and higher raw material
costs that manufacturers passed through in the form of higher
prices. Operating income for SMB in fiscal 2006 was
$75 million, or 19% of revenues, compared to fiscal 2005
operating income of $43 million, or 14% of revenues. The
higher operating margins were primarily attributable to the
increase in production and a reduction in labor costs, raw
material costs and melt shop conversion costs, reflecting the
efficiencies gained through capital and equipment improvements.
Outlook
SMB sells its products primarily to construction markets located
on the West Coast of the U.S. In the past few years, demand
in these markets has been strong and West Coast steel
manufacturers have generally been operating at full capacity.
The strong demand has attracted competition from imported steel
but prices have remained high by historical standards. As the
market for steel products is worldwide, the level of imports is
dependent upon differences in market prices in the U.S. and
that attainable in other markets around the world.
West Coast demand for steel is based upon both residential and
non-residential construction activity. During 2007, lower demand
caused by a slowdown in the housing sector was offset by
continued good demand in commercial construction. While the
latter is closely related to economic conditions in the region,
the high level of expected state and federal government spending
in the West related to highway infrastructure may provide an
offset to any weakening in commercial construction activity
going forward.
To better take advantage of the positive market environment in
which it operates, SMB has made a serious of capital investments
that have increased capacity and improved efficiencies. As a
result of these investments, capacity at the mill has been
increased from around 600,000 tons annually prior to 2005 to
greater than 750,000 tons currently. In 2008, SMB believes
market demand will enable it to sell the incremental product it
is able to produce.
The increased demand for steel worldwide has resulted in higher
prices for the raw materials used in steel making, including
scrap metal, alloys and fluxes. The ability of steel
manufacturers to pass through increased costs is a function of
demand in the markets in which they operate. During 2007,
margins at SMB declined as the rise in raw material costs was
greater than the increase in net selling prices. During 2008,
raw material prices are expected to remain firm, and the ability
of SMB to pass through these costs will be dependent upon the
strength of market demand and the level of competition from
foreign imports.
34
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The Company relies on cash provided by operating activities as a
primary source of liquidity, supplemented by current cash
resources and existing credit facilities.
Sources
and Uses of Cash
The Company had cash balances of $13 million,
$25 million and $21 million at August 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Cash balances are intended to be
used for working capital and capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2007 was
$179 million, which included net income of
$131 million, $41 million of depreciation and
amortization expense, an increase in accounts payable of
$17 million due to the timing of payments and a decrease in
inventory of $15 million due to timing of shipments. These
sources of cash were partially offset by a $43 million
increase in accounts receivable due to the high volume of
shipments made in the fourth quarter, and the $15 million
payment for the SEC and DOJ settlement. Net cash provided by
operating activities was $105 million and $146 million
in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decline in cash
provided by operating activities in fiscal 2006 compared to
fiscal 2005 was the result of a slight decrease in net income of
$4 million, and a decrease in the impact of non-cash items,
which was primarily related to a non-cash gain from the HNC
separation and termination agreement in 2006, along with tax
benefits from employee stock options.
Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2007 was
$117 million compared to $198 million in fiscal 2006
and $72 million in fiscal 2005. Net cash used in investing
activities in fiscal 2007 included $81 million in capital
expenditures to upgrade the Companys equipment and
infrastructure and $45 million in acquisitions completed in
fiscal 2007. The increase in outflows for investing activities
in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily related to
capital expenditure costs to modernize and upgrade the
Companys infrastructure and equipment, along with
significant acquisitions that occurred in fiscal 2006.
Net cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2007 was
$74 million, compared to $97 million of cash provided
by financing activities in fiscal 2006 and net cash used by
financing activities of $65 million in fiscal 2005. The
increase in cash used in financing activities from fiscal 2006
to 2007 was primarily due to $110 million in share
repurchases, partially offset by $40 million provided by
net borrowings. The increase in cash from financing activities
in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 was a result of the
Companys increased borrowings in fiscal 2006.
Credit
Facilities
The Company has short-term borrowings consisting primarily of an
unsecured credit line, which was increased on March 1,
2007, by $5 million to $20 million. This line of
credit expires on March 1, 2008. Interest rates on
outstanding indebtedness under the unsecured line of credit are
set by the bank at the time of borrowing. The credit available
under this agreement is uncommitted. The Company had
$20 million of borrowings outstanding on this line as of
August 31, 2007. The weighted average interest rate on this
line was 5.98% at August 31, 2007. There were no amounts
outstanding under the agreement as of August 31, 2006.
In November 2005, the Company entered into an amended and
restated unsecured committed bank credit agreement with Bank of
America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders
party thereto, which was amended in July 2007. The revised
agreement provides for a five-year, $450 million revolving
credit facility loan maturing in July 2012. Interest rates on
outstanding indebtedness under the amended agreement are based,
at the Companys option, on either the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of between 0.50%
and 1.00%, with the amount of the spread based on a pricing grid
tied to the Companys leverage ratio, or the greater of the
prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.50%. In addition,
annual commitment fees are payable on the unused portion of the
credit facility at rates between 0.10% and 0.25% based on a
pricing grid tied to the Companys leverage ratio.
As of August 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had borrowings
outstanding under the credit facility of $115 million and
$95 million, respectively.
The two bank credit agreements contain various representations
and warranties, events of default and financial and other
covenants, including covenants regarding maintenance of a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a
35
maximum leverage ratio. As of August 31, 2007, the Company
was in compliance with all such covenants, representations and
warranties.
In addition, as of August 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company
had $8 million of long-term bonded indebtedness that
matures in January 2021.
Capital
Expenditures
Capital expenditures totaled $81 million, $87 million
and $48 million for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The increases in capital expenditures primarily
reflect the Companys significant investments in modern
equipment to improve the efficiency and capabilities of its
businesses and to further enhance the Companys
competitiveness. The capital expenditures in fiscal 2007
included partial payments for the installation of new
mega-shredders at the Companys Oakland, California;
Everett, Massachusetts; and Portland, Oregon export facilities,
major repairs to the dock at the Portland, Oregon facility and
other upgrades to equipment and infrastructure at the MRB
facilities. The Company also expended capital for the
implementation of a point-of-sale system at its self-service
used auto parts stores, the conversion of five sites acquired in
the GreenLeaf acquisition to the Companys self-service
store model and the upgrade of the reheat furnace, billet
craneway and other projects at the SMB facility designed to
improve efficiency and increase output. The Company anticipates
that capital expenditures in fiscal 2008 will approximate the
expenditures made in fiscal 2007. Capital projects in fiscal
2008 are expected to include significant enhancements to the
Companys information technology infrastructure, further
investments in technology to improve the recovery of nonferrous
materials from the shredding process, the establishment of
additional nonferrous collection facilities, improvements to the
Companys marine shipping infrastructure and further
investments to improve efficiency, increase worker safety and
enhance environmental systems. The Company expects to use cash
from operations to fund capital expenditures and available lines
of credit to fund acquisitions in fiscal 2008.
Share
Repurchase Program
Pursuant to a share repurchase program as amended in 2001 and in
October 2006, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to
6.0 million shares of its Class A Common stock when
management deems such repurchases to be appropriate. Management
evaluates long and short-range forecasts as well as anticipated
sources and uses of cash before determining the course of action
that would best enhance shareholder value. Prior to fiscal 2007,
the Company had repurchased 1.3 million shares under the
program. In fiscal 2007, the Company repurchased a total of
2.5 million shares under this program, leaving
2.2 million shares available for repurchase.
Pension
Contributions
The Company maintains a defined benefit plan for certain of its
non-union employees. In fiscal 2006, pension benefits were
frozen for employees covered under this plan. Employees
participating in the defined benefit plan and other employees of
the Company will receive future retirement benefits under
defined contribution retirement plans sponsored by the Company,
which makes periodic contributions to fund the plans within the
range allowed by applicable regulations. The Company makes
contributions to a defined benefit pension plan, several defined
contribution plans and several multi-employer pension plans.
Contributions vary depending on the plan and are based upon plan
provisions, actuarial valuations and negotiated labor
agreements. In fiscal 2006, the Company froze further benefit
accruals in its defined benefit plan and as a result made no
further contributions in fiscal 2007 and anticipates making no
contributions in fiscal 2008. However, changes in the discount
rate or actual investment returns different from the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets could require the
Company to make future contributions. The Company believes any
additional funding requirements would not have a material impact
on its financial condition. See Note 12
Employee Benefits, in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for
further discussion of the Companys retirement benefit
plans. The Company expects to make contributions to its various
defined contribution plans of approximately $9 million in
fiscal 2008. Included in this amount is $4 million, of
contributions the Company anticipates making to the
multi-employer plans, including a contribution of more than
$2 million for the multi-employer plan benefiting union
employees of SMB.
36
Assessment
of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, the Companys available cash resources,
internally generated funds, credit facilities and equity
offerings have financed its acquisitions, capital expenditures,
working capital and other financing needs.
The Company believes its current cash resources, internally
generated funds, and existing credit facilities will provide
adequate financing for acquisitions, capital expenditures,
working capital, joint ventures, stock repurchases, debt service
requirements, post-retirement obligations and future
environmental obligations for the next twelve months. In the
longer-term, the Company may seek to finance business expansion
with additional borrowing arrangements or additional equity
financing.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
With the exception of operating leases, the Company is not a
party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are
reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect
on the Companys financial conditions, results of
operations or cash flows. The Company enters into operating
leases for both new equipment and property.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The Company has certain contractual obligations to make future
payments. The following table summarizes these future
obligations as of August 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due by Period
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
115,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,700
|
|
|
$
|
122,876
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
38,361
|
|
Capital leases, including interest
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
Pension funding obligations
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
12,968
|
|
|
|
11,432
|
|
|
|
8,462
|
|
|
|
6,537
|
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
7,975
|
|
|
|
51,520
|
|
Service obligation
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,579
|
|
Purchase obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials purchase commitment
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,648
|
|
Gas
contract(1)
|
|
|
9,593
|
|
|
|
9,654
|
|
|
|
9,654
|
|
|
|
7,221
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,122
|
|
Electric
contract(2)
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
36,659
|
|
|
$
|
33,920
|
|
|
$
|
29,561
|
|
|
$
|
24,480
|
|
|
$
|
127,150
|
|
|
$
|
20,295
|
|
|
$
|
272,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
SMB has a take-or-pay natural gas
contract that currently requires a minimum purchase of
3,435 MMBTU per day at tiered pricing, whether or not the
amount is utilized. Effective April 1, 2006 through
October 31, 2007, the blended rate was $8.22 per MMBTU. The
blended rate decreases to $7.70 effective November 1, 2007
through October 31, 2008. The contract expires on
May 31, 2011.
|
(2)
|
|
SMB has an electricity contract
with MWL that requires a minimum purchase of electricity at a
rate subject to variable pricing, whether or not the amount is
utilized. The fixed portion of the contract obligates SMB to pay
$175,000 per month for eleven months each year until the
contract expires in September 2011.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company has identified critical accounting estimates, which
are those that are most important to the Companys
portrayal of its financial condition and operating results.
These estimates require difficult and subjective judgments,
including whether estimates are required to be made about
matters that are inherently uncertain, if different estimates
reasonably could have been used, or if changes in the estimates
that are reasonably likely to occur could materially impact the
financial statements. Significant estimates underlying the
accompanying consolidated financial statements include inventory
valuation, goodwill and other intangible asset valuation,
environmental costs, contingencies, assessment of the valuation
of deferred income taxes and income tax contingencies, pension
plan assumptions, share-based compensation assumptions and
revenue recognition.
37
Inventories
The Companys inventories primarily consist of ferrous and
nonferrous unprocessed metals, ferrous processed metals, used
and salvaged vehicles and finished steel products consisting of
rebar, coiled rebar, merchant bar and wire rod. Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost or market. MRB determines the cost
of ferrous and nonferrous inventories principally using the
average cost method and capitalizes substantially all direct
costs and yard costs into inventory. APB establishes cost for
used and salvage vehicle inventory based on the average price
the Company pays for a vehicle. The self-service business
capitalizes only the vehicle cost into inventory while the
full-service business capitalizes the vehicle cost, dismantling
and, where applicable, storage and towing fees into inventory.
SMB establishes its finished steel product inventory cost based
on a weighted average cost and capitalizes all direct and
indirect costs of manufacturing into inventory. Indirect costs
of manufacturing include general plant costs, maintenance, human
resources and yard costs.
The accounting process utilized by the Company to record
unprocessed metal and used and salvage vehicle inventory
quantities relies on significant estimates. With respect to
unprocessed metals inventory, the Company relies on perpetual
inventory records that utilize estimated recoveries and yields
that are based on historical trends and periodic tests for
certain unprocessed metal commodities. Over time, these
estimates are reasonably good indicators of what is ultimately
produced; however, actual recoveries and yields can vary
depending on product quality, moisture content and source of the
unprocessed metals. If ultimate recoveries and yields are
significantly different than estimated, the value of the
Companys inventory could be materially overstated or
understated. To assist in validating the reasonableness of these
estimates, the Company runs periodic tests and performs monthly
physical inventory estimates. However, due to variations in
product density, holding period and production processes
utilized to manufacture the product, physical inventories will
not necessarily detect all variances. To mitigate this risk, the
Company adjusts the value of its ferrous physical inventories
when the volume of a commodity is low and a physical inventory
count can more accurately predict the remaining volume. In
addition, the Company establishes inventory reserves based upon
historical experience of adjustments to further mitigate the
risk of significant adjustments when determined reasonable.
Currently the reserve is established at 1.0% of processed
ferrous inventory. An increase in the reserve of 0.5% would
reduce the value of inventory by less than $1 million. The
Company does not maintain a reserve for nonferrous inventory, as
quantities on hand by yard turn over rapidly and are typically
low enough that amounts can be accurately determined.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible
assets with indefinite lives, management must make assumptions
regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to
determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these
estimates and related assumptions change in the future, the
Company may be required to record impairment charges not
previously recorded. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
(SFAS 142), the Company is required to assess
goodwill for impairment at least annually using a two-step
process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of the
reporting unit. The first step determines whether or not
impairment has occurred by estimating the fair value of its
reporting units using the present value of future cash flows
approach, subject to a comparison for reasonableness to its
market capitalization at the date of valuation. The second step
measures the amount of any impairment. These tests utilize fair
value amounts that are determined by estimated future cash flows
developed by management. Selected costs and statistics used to
evaluate goodwill are typically related to pricing and volumes
of goods sold, costs as a percentage of revenues and the
cyclicality inherent in the Companys industries.
Environmental
Costs
The Company operates in industries that inherently possess
environmental risks. To manage these risks, the Company employs
both its own environmental staff and outside consultants.
Environmental staff and finance personnel meet regularly to stay
updated on environmental risks. The Company estimates future
costs for known environmental remediation requirements and
accrues for them on an undiscounted basis when it is probable
that the Company has incurred a liability and the related costs
can be reasonably estimated. The regulatory and government
management of these projects is extremely complex, which is one
of the primary factors that make it difficult to assess the cost
of potential and future remediation of potential sites. When
only a wide range of estimated amounts
38
can be reasonably established and no other amount within the
range is better than another, the low end of the range is
recorded in the financial statements. If further developments or
resolution of an environmental matter results in facts and
circumstances that are significantly different than the
assumptions used to develop these reserves, the accrual for
environmental remediation could be materially understated or
overstated. Adjustments to these liabilities are made when
additional information becomes available that affects the
estimated costs to study or remediate any environmental issues
or when expenditures for which reserves are established are
made. The factors which the Company considers in its recognition
and measurement of environmental liabilities include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Current regulations, both at the time the reserve is established
and during the course of the
clean-up,
which specify standards for acceptable remediation;
|
|
|
Information about the site, which becomes available as the site
is studied and remediated;
|
|
|
The professional judgment of both senior-level internal staff
and external consultants, who take into account similar, recent
instances of environmental remediation issues, among other
considerations;
|
|
|
Technologies available that can be used for remediation; and
|
|
|
The number and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties and the extent of their responsibility for
the remediation.
|
Accrued
Workers Compensation Costs
The Company is self-insured up to a maximum amount per claim for
workers compensation claims and, as such, a reserve for
the costs of claims that have not been paid and the estimated
cost of incurred but not reported claims as of the balance sheet
date is estimated. The Companys exposure to claims is
protected by various stop-loss insurance policies. The reserve
is established based on historical claim experience. At
August 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company accrued
$7 million and $4 million, respectively, for the
estimated cost of workers compensation claims. If the
ultimate development of these claims is significantly different
than those that have been estimated, the accrual for future
workers compensation claims could be materially overstated
or understated.
Deferred
Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the differences at fiscal year-end
between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and
liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates.
Tax credits are recognized as a reduction of income tax expense
in the year the credit arises. Periodically, the Company reviews
its deferred tax assets to assess whether a valuation allowance
is necessary. A valuation allowance is established to reduce
deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards,
to the extent the assets are more likely than not to be
unrealized. Although realization is not assured, management
believes it is more likely than not that the Companys
deferred tax assets will be realized. If the ultimate
realization of the Companys deferred tax assets is
significantly different than the expectations, the value of our
deferred tax assets could be materially overstated.
Pension
Plans
The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan for certain
of its non-union employees. Pension plans are a significant cost
of doing business, and the related obligations are expected to
be settled far in the future. Accounting for defined benefit
pension plans results in the current recognition of liabilities
and net periodic pension cost over employees expected
service periods based on the terms of the plans and the impact
of the Companys investment and funding decisions. The
measurement of pension obligations and recognition of
liabilities and costs require significant assumptions. Two
critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected
long-term rate of return on the assets of the plan, may have an
impact on the Companys financial condition and results of
operations. Actual results will often differ from assumptions
relating to long-term rates of return for equities and fixed
income securities because of economic and other factors. The
discount rate assumption as of August 31, 2007 was 6.0%. A
0.5% increase or decrease in the discount rate would reduce or
increase the net pension liability by approximately
$1 million as of August 31, 2007 and accumulated other
comprehensive income would be reduced or increased by the same
amount, adjusted for taxes, and net periodic cost for fiscal
2007 would be reduced or increased by $161,000. The weighted
average expected return on assets assumption as of
August 31, 2007 was 7.0%. The expected return on assets is
a long-term assumption whose accuracy can only be measured over
a long period based on past experience. A 0.5% increase or
decrease in this assumption would reduce or increase net
periodic pension cost by $70,000.
39
The Company adopted SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),
(SFAS 158) on August 31, 2007.
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize the funded
status of its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit
plans as a net asset or liability in its statement of financial
position, with an offsetting amount in accumulated other
comprehensive income, and to recognize changes in that funded
status in the year in which changes occur through comprehensive
income. Following the adoption of SFAS 158, additional
minimum pension liabilities and related intangible assets are no
longer recognized. For further detail regarding the
Companys pension plans, refer to Note 12 -
Employee Benefits, in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Share-based
Compensation
Effective September 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised
2004), Shared-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)), which requires the recognition
of the fair value of share-based compensation in net income. The
Company elected to utilize the modified prospective transition
method for adopting SFAS 123(R), and therefore, did not
retroactively adjust the results of prior periods. Under this
transition method, compensation expense based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions
of SFAS 123, Share-Based Payment for all
share-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of, September 1, 2005, is being recognized in net
income in the periods after the date of adoption. Share-based
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted
after September 1, 2005 is based on the grant date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS 123(R). The Company recognizes compensation expense,
net of a forfeiture rate, on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award, which is generally the
five-year vesting term for stock options and restricted stock
units (RSUs) and the three-year performance period
for performance-based shares. The Company estimated the
forfeiture rate based on historical experience during the
preceding five fiscal years. Determining the appropriate fair
value model and calculating the fair value of share-based
payment awards requires the input of subjective assumptions,
including the expected life of the share-based payment awards
and stock price volatility, which is based on historical
month-end closing stock prices. The assumptions used in
calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards
represent managements best estimates, but these estimates
involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management
judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses
different assumptions, the Companys share-based
compensation expense could be materially different in the
future. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the
expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those
shares expected to fully vest. If the Companys actual
forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the
share-based compensation expense could be significantly
different from what the Company has recorded in the current
period. See Note 13 - Stock Incentive Plan, in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this report.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. Revenue is recognized when the Company has a
contract or purchase order from a customer with a fixed price,
the title and risk of loss transfer to the buyer and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Title for both scrap metal
and finished steel products transfers upon shipment, based on
either cost, insurance and freight (CIF) or free on
board (FOB) terms. A significant portion of the
Companys ferrous export sales of recycled metal are made
with letters of credit, reducing credit risk. However, domestic
recycled ferrous metal sales, nonferrous sales and sales of
finished steel are generally made on open account. For retail
sales by APB, revenues are recognized when customers pay for
parts or when wholesale products are shipped to the customer
location. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are
made for returns because, historically, there have been very few
sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate
collection of revenues.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). This interpretation clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
entitys financial statements in accordance with
SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. It
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
financial statement recognition and disclosure of tax positions
taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. This
40
interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The Company will be required to adopt
FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. Management
does not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 requires public
companies to quantify errors using both a balance sheet and
income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach
results in quantifying a misstatement as material, when all
relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered.
The adoption of SAB 108 by the Company at August 31,
2007 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the
reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for
that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim
period within that fiscal year. The Company will be required to
adopt SFAS 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Management is currently evaluating the requirements of
SFAS 157 and has not yet determined the impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
establishes a fair value option under which entities can elect
to report certain financial assets and liabilities at fair
value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Earlier
application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity
also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS 157.
SFAS 159 becomes effective for the Company in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009. Management is currently evaluating
the requirements of SFAS 159 and has not yet concluded if
the fair value option will be adopted.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Commodity
Price Risk
The Company is exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in
the market price for both ferrous and non-ferrous metals which
are at times volatile. See the discussion under the section
entitled Risk Factors Industries in which
the Company operates, are cyclical and demand can be volatile,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition. in
Part I, Item 1A of this report. The Company attempts
to mitigate this risk by seeking to turn its inventories quickly
rather than holding inventories in speculation of higher
commodity prices.
The Companys is also exposed to risks associated with
fluctuations in the market prices for electricity and natural
gas which are at times volatile. The Companys risk
strategy associated with the purchase of commodities utilized
within its production processes has generally been to make
certain commitments with suppliers relating to future expected
requirements for such commodities. The Companys gas
contract contains provisions which require it to take or
pay for specified quantities without regard to actual
usage for 12 month periods. The Companys commitments
for natural gas with take or pay or other similar
commitment provisions for the years ending August 31 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
9,593
|
|
9,654
|
|
9,654
|
|
7,221
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
36,122
|
The Company believes that production requirements will be such
that consumption of the products or services purchased under
these commitments will occur in the normal production process.
The Company also purchases the electricity consumed at SMB
pursuant to a contract which extends through September 2011. The
contract designates hours annually as interruptible
service and establishes an agreed fixed rate energy charge
per Mill/kWh consumed for each year through the expiration of
the agreement. A 10% increase in electricity rates would result
in a $1 million impact on fiscal 2007 cost of goods sold.
41
Interest
Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk associated with changes in
interest rates related primarily to our debt obligations. The
Companys credit line and revolving credit facility are
variable in rate and therefore have exposure to changes in
interest rates. A 10% change in interest rates would result in a
$1 million impact on fiscal 2007 interest expense.
Foreign
Currency Risk
The Companys international operations are subject to
foreign exchange rate volatility. The Companys risk
strategy is to mitigate foreign currency exchange risk by
entering into foreign currency forward contracts related to the
expected cash receipts from sales denominated in euros.
The Company held foreign currency forward contracts denominated
in euros with total notional amounts of $8 million at
August 31, 2007. Assuming a hypothetical 10% weakening or
strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared with euro at
August 31, 2007, the fair value of the Companys
foreign currency contracts would decrease or increase,
respectively by less than $1 million and the Companys
related derivative liability would increase by the same amount.
It is important to note the increase or decrease in the
derivative liability indicated in this sensitivity analysis
would be somewhat offset by changes in the fair value of the
underlying receivables. These offsetting gains and losses are
not reflected in the above analysis.
42
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Index
to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
All other schedules and exhibits are omitted, as the information
is not applicable or is not required.
43
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
by, or under the supervision of, the Companys principal
executive and principal financial officers and effected by the
Companys Board of Directors, management and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes policies and procedures that relate to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the
Company; provide reasonable assurance that all transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and that the
proper authorization of receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made in accordance with authorization of the
Companys management and directors; and provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods is subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree
of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management of the Company assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting using
the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its
assessment, management determined that the Companys
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
August 31, 2007.
Management has excluded three entities acquired in fiscal 2007
from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting
as of August 31, 2007, because they were acquired by the
Company in purchase business combinations during the year ended
August 31, 2007. On a combined basis, total assets and
revenues for these entities represented one percent of the
related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for
the year ended August 31, 2007.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public
accounting firm that audited the Companys consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report, also
audited the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting as of August 31, 2007, as stated
in their report included herein.
|
|
|
John D. Carter
|
|
Gregory J. Witherspoon
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
October 29, 2007
|
|
October 29, 2007
|
44
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Schnitzer Steel
Industries, Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. and
its subsidiaries at August 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended August 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the
Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2007,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for these financial
statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on these financial statements, on the financial statement
schedule, and on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Note 2 to the notes to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it
accounts for share based compensation as of September 1,
2005. As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts
for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans as of
August 31, 2007.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness as to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
45
As described in Managements Annual Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded three
entities acquired in fiscal 2007 from its assessment of internal
control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2007
because they were acquired by the Company in purchase business
combinations during the year ended August 31, 2007. We have
also excluded these entities from our audit of internal control
over financial reporting. Total assets and revenues for these
entities represented one percent of the related consolidated
financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended
August 31, 2007.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Portland, Oregon
October 29, 2007
46
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,410
|
|
|
$
|
25,356
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,725
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,821 in 2007 and $1,270 in 2006
|
|
|
170,212
|
|
|
|
118,839
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
258,568
|
|
|
|
263,583
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,685
|
|
|
|
7,285
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
10,601
|
|
|
|
15,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
461,476
|
|
|
|
438,744
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
383,910
|
|
|
|
312,907
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to joint venture partnerships
|
|
|
9,824
|
|
|
|
8,859
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
277,083
|
|
|
|
266,675
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
12,090
|
|
|
|
10,958
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
6,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,151,414
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations, current
|
|
$
|
20,275
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
89,526
|
|
|
|
66,506
|
|
Accrued payroll and related liabilities
|
|
|
43,145
|
|
|
|
32,420
|
|
Investigation reserve
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,225
|
|
Current portion of environmental liabilities
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
3,648
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
30,420
|
|
|
|
28,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
192,189
|
|
|
|
151,138
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
9,916
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current
maturities
|
|
|
124,079
|
|
|
|
102,829
|
|
Environmental liabilities, net of current portion
|
|
|
39,249
|
|
|
|
37,754
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
5,540
|
|
|
|
3,855
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock20,000 shares authorized, none issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Class A common stock75,000 shares $1.00 par
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized, 21,231 and 22,793 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
21,231
|
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
Class B common stock25,000 shares $1.00 par
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized, 7,328 and 7,986 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
41,344
|
|
|
|
137,281
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
693,470
|
|
|
|
564,165
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
765,064
|
|
|
|
734,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,151,414
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
47
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,572,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,854,715
|
|
|
$
|
853,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
2,179,927
|
|
|
|
1,526,990
|
|
|
|
621,583
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
186,030
|
|
|
|
156,862
|
|
|
|
58,103
|
|
Environmental matters
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,951
|
|
(Income) from joint ventures
|
|
|
(5,441
|
)
|
|
|
(4,201
|
)
|
|
|
(69,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
213,563
|
|
|
|
175,064
|
|
|
|
231,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,213
|
)
|
|
|
(3,498
|
)
|
|
|
(847
|
)
|
Gain on divestiture of joint ventures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
56,856
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
2,509
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(4,598
|
)
|
|
|
56,625
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and pre-acquisition interests
|
|
|
208,965
|
|
|
|
231,689
|
|
|
|
230,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(75,333
|
)
|
|
|
(86,871
|
)
|
|
|
(81,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and pre-acquisition interests
|
|
|
133,632
|
|
|
|
144,818
|
|
|
|
149,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,934
|
)
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-acquisition interests, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
131,334
|
|
|
$
|
143,068
|
|
|
$
|
146,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - basic
|
|
$
|
4.38
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share - diluted
|
|
$
|
4.32
|
|
|
$
|
4.65
|
|
|
$
|
4.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
48
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at September 1, 2004
|
|
|
22,022
|
|
|
$
|
22,022
|
|
|
|
8,306
|
|
|
$
|
8,306
|
|
|
$
|
110,177
|
|
|
$
|
278,374
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
418,880
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,867
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock converted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Class A common stock
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Class A common stock issued
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
Tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,157
|
|
Cash dividends paid - common ($0.068 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2005
|
|
|
22,490
|
|
|
|
22,490
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
125,845
|
|
|
|
423,178
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
579,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,068
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock issued
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
Tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,080
|
|
Cash dividends paid - common ($0.068 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2006
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
|
|
22,793
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
137,281
|
|
|
|
564,165
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
734,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,334
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of adopting SFAS 158 (net of tax)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,150
|
)
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
Class B common stock converted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Class A common stock
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,801
|
|
Tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
Cash dividends paid - common ($0.068 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 31, 2007
|
|
|
21,231
|
|
|
$
|
21,231
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
$
|
7,328
|
|
|
$
|
41,344
|
|
|
$
|
693,470
|
|
|
$
|
1,691
|
|
|
$
|
765,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
49
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
131,334
|
|
|
$
|
143,068
|
|
|
$
|
146,867
|
|
Noncash items included in income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
40,563
|
|
|
|
31,411
|
|
|
|
20,881
|
|
Minority and pre-acquisition interests
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,134
|
|
|
|
(6,611
|
)
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
Distributed/(undistributed) equity in earnings of joint ventures
|
|
|
(2,945
|
)
|
|
|
15,635
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
9,801
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain on disposition of joint venture assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(56,856
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tax benefit from employee stock option plan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,157
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
(4,080
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Environmental matters
|
|
|
(1,814
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,951
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(42,875
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
(7,883
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
15,369
|
|
|
|
(60,969
|
)
|
|
|
(26,022
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
3,390
|
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
|
|
(8,646
|
)
|
Intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
(1,095
|
)
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
(3,895
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
17,432
|
|
|
|
11,616
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
12,337
|
|
|
|
10,953
|
|
|
|
(3,246
|
)
|
Investigation reserve
|
|
|
(15,225
|
)
|
|
|
15,225
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
(7,553
|
)
|
|
|
(12,746
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
179,315
|
|
|
|
105,215
|
|
|
|
146,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(80,853
|
)
|
|
|
(86,583
|
)
|
|
|
(48,250
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(44,634
|
)
|
|
|
(77,237
|
)
|
|
|
(22,331
|
)
|
(Advances to) payments from joint ventures, net
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
Purchase of minority shareholders interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(25,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
Cash flows from non-hedge derivatives
|
|
|
(1,908
|
)
|
|
|
(2,617
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,725
|
|
|
|
(7,725
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(117,408
|
)
|
|
|
(197,787
|
)
|
|
|
(72,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line of credit
|
|
|
469,900
|
|
|
|
217,500
|
|
|
|
132,300
|
|
Repayment of line of credit
|
|
|
(449,900
|
)
|
|
|
(217,500
|
)
|
|
|
(132,300
|
)
|
Borrowings from long-term debt
|
|
|
846,511
|
|
|
|
455,577
|
|
|
|
133,100
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(826,739
|
)
|
|
|
(360,615
|
)
|
|
|
(193,331
|
)
|
Issuance of Class A common stock
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
Repurchase of Class A common stock
|
|
|
(110,150
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
4,080
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Distributions to minority interests
|
|
|
(3,939
|
)
|
|
|
(3,680
|
)
|
|
|
(3,875
|
)
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
(2,081
|
)
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(74,154
|
)
|
|
|
96,846
|
|
|
|
(64,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(11,946
|
)
|
|
|
4,711
|
|
|
|
9,338
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
25,356
|
|
|
|
20,645
|
|
|
|
11,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
13,410
|
|
|
$
|
25,356
|
|
|
$
|
20,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
50
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 1 -
|
Nature of
Operations
|
Founded in 1906, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. (the
Company), an Oregon corporation, is currently one of
the nations largest recyclers of ferrous and nonferrous
metals, a leading recycler of used and salvaged vehicles and a
manufacturer of finished steel products.
The Company operates in three reportable segments that include
the Metals Recycling Business (MRB), the Auto Parts
Business (APB) and the Steel Manufacturing Business
(SMB). MRB purchases, collects, processes, recycles,
sells, trades and brokers recycled metal by operating one of the
largest metals recycling businesses in the United States
(U.S.). APB is one of the countrys leading
self-service and full-service used auto parts networks.
Additionally, APB is a supplier of autobodies to MRB, which
processes the autobodies into sellable recycled metal. SMB
purchases recycled metal from MRB and uses its mini-mill to
process the recycled metal into finished steel products. The
Company provides an end of life cycle solution for a variety of
products through its vertically integrated businesses, including
sale of used auto parts, procuring autobodies and other metal
products and manufacturing them into finished steel products.
As of August 31, 2007, the Companys facilities were
located primarily in the U.S. and Canada.
|
|
Note 2 -
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the
Company held a 50% interest in five joint ventures which were
accounted for under the equity method. All significant
intercompany account balances, transactions and profits have
been eliminated at August 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Cash, receivables and current liabilities in the consolidated
financial statements are considered to reflect fair value
because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The
fair value of long-term debt is deemed to be the same as that
reflected in the consolidated financial statements given the
variable interest rates on the significant credit facilities.
Allocation
of Acquisition Purchase Price
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquisitions to
identified tangible and intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the
date of acquisition, with any residual amounts allocated to
goodwill. In addition, the Company accrues for any contingent
purchase price consideration if the outcome of the contingency
is deemed probable at the date of the acquisition.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term securities that are
not restricted by third parties and have an original maturity
date of 90 days or less. Included in accounts payable are
book overdrafts of $26 million and $13 million as of
August 31, 2007 and August 31, 2006, respectively.
Restricted
Cash
In August 2006, the Company deposited into a custody account
$8 million in connection with the expected settlement of
the investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the staff of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Interest on the amount
deposited accrued for the benefit of the Company and was
51
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
recognized as interest income when earned. The deposited funds
were released to the SEC in October 2006 upon completion of the
settlement. See Note 11 Commitments and
Contingencies.
Accounts
Receivable, net
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers on
product and other sales. These accounts receivable, which are
reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts, are recorded at
the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The Company
evaluates the collectibility of its accounts receivable based on
a combination of factors. In cases where management is aware of
circumstances that may impair a specific customers ability
to meet its financial obligations to the Company, management
records a specific allowance against amounts due and reduces the
net recognized receivable to the amount the Company believes
will be collected. For all other customers, the Company
maintains a reserve that considers the total receivables
outstanding, historical collection rates and economic trends.
The allowance for doubtful accounts was $2 million and
$1 million at August 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Inventories,
net
The Companys inventories primarily consist of ferrous and
nonferrous processed and unprocessed metals, used and salvaged
vehicles and finished steel products consisting of rebar, coiled
rebar, merchant bar and wire rod. Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. MRB determines the cost of ferrous and
nonferrous inventories principally using the average cost method
and capitalizes substantially all direct costs and yard costs
into inventory. APB establishes cost for used and salvage
vehicle inventory based on the average price the Company pays
for a vehicle. The self-service business capitalizes only the
vehicle cost into inventory, while the full-service business
capitalizes the vehicle cost, dismantling, and where applicable,
storage and towing fees into inventory. SMB establishes its
finished steel product inventory cost based on a weighted
average cost, and capitalizes all direct and indirect costs of
manufacturing into inventory. Indirect costs of manufacturing
include general plant costs, maintenance, human resources and
yard costs.
Due to variations in product density, holding period and
production processes utilized to manufacture the product,
physical inventories will not necessarily detect all variances.
To mitigate this risk, the Company adjusts the value of its
ferrous physical inventories when the volume of a commodity is
low and a physical inventory count can more accurately predict
the remaining volume. In addition, the Company establishes
inventory reserves based upon historical experience of
adjustments to further mitigate the risk of significant
adjustments when determined reasonable. The reserve was
$2 million and $1 million as of August 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
Property,
Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures
for major additions and improvements are capitalized, while
routine repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized interest for fiscal 2007 and 2006 was
$2 million and $1 million, respectively. During fiscal
2005 there was no capitalized interest. When assets are retired
or sold, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and resulting gains or losses are
generally included in operating expenses. Depreciation is
recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the estimated useful lives of the property or the remaining
lease term, whichever is less. At August 31, 2007, the
useful lives used for depreciation and amortization were as
follows:
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
20 to 40 years
|
Land improvements
|
|
3 to 20 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
3 to 15 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 20 years
|
52
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets
The Company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows to be
derived from an asset to assess whether or not a potential
impairment exists when certain triggering events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived
asset may be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds the
Companys estimate of future undiscounted cash flows, the
Company records an impairment for the difference between the
carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. There were no
material adjustments to the carrying value of long-lived assets
during the years ended August 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Goodwill
and Other Intangibles
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the
estimated fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets
of the acquired entities. The Company accounts for its goodwill
and other intangibles under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, (SFAS 142).
Under SFAS 142, goodwill is not amortized, but it is tested
for impairment at least annually. Each year the Company tests
for impairment of goodwill according to a two-step approach. In
the first step the Company estimates the fair values of its
reporting units using the present value of future cash flows
approach, subject to a comparison for reasonableness to its
market capitalization at the date of valuation. If the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the goodwill
impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the
impairment loss, if any. In the second step the implied fair
value of the goodwill is estimated as the fair value of the
reporting unit used in the first step, less the fair values of
all other net tangible and intangible assets of the reporting
unit. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its implied
fair market value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the
goodwill. In addition, goodwill of a reporting unit is tested
for impairment between the annual tests, which take place during
the second quarter, if an event occurs or circumstances change
that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying value. Non-compete agreements
are amortized over the lives of the respective agreements on a
straight-line basis. The Companys other intangible assets
with indefinite lives, including tradenames and in-place
distributor networks, are not amortized, but are also tested for
impairment at least annually or as events and circumstances
arise which may trigger impairment. The impairment test consists
of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets to
their carrying amount.
Accrued
Workers Compensation Costs
The Company is self-insured up to a maximum amount for
workers compensation claims and as such, a reserve for the
costs of unpaid claims and the estimated costs of incurred but
not reported claims has been estimated as of the balance sheet
date. The Companys exposure to claims is protected by
various stop-loss insurance policies. The estimate of this
reserve is based on historical claim experience. At
August 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company accrued
$7 million and $4 million, respectively, for the
estimated cost of workers compensation claims.
Environmental
Liabilities
The Company estimates future costs for known environmental
remediation requirements and accrues for them on an undiscounted
basis when it is probable that the Company has incurred a
liability and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. The
Company considers various factors when estimating its
environmental liabilities. Adjustments to the liabilities are
made when additional information becomes available that affects
the estimated costs to study or remediate any environmental
issues or when expenditures for which reserves are established
are made.
When only a wide range of estimated amounts can be reasonably
established and no other amount within the range is better than
another, the low end of the range is recorded in the financial
statements. In a number of cases, it is possible that the
Company may receive reimbursement through insurance or from
other potentially responsible
53
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
parties identified in a claim. In these situations, recoveries
of environmental remediation costs from other parties are
recognized when the claim for recovery is actually realized. As
assessments and remediation progresses at individual sites, the
amounts recorded are reviewed periodically and adjusted to
reflect additional technical and legal information that becomes
available.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
To manage the exposure to exchange risk associated with
significant accounts receivable denominated in a foreign
currency, the Company enters into foreign currency forward
contracts to stabilize the U.S. dollar amount of the
transaction at maturity. These contracts are not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133),
SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities an
amendment of SFAS 133 or under
SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
Net realized and unrealized losses related to foreign currency
contract settlements and mark-to-market adjustments on open
foreign currency contracts were $2 million and
$1 million for the years ended August 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The Company did not enter into foreign
currency contracts in fiscal 2005.
The Company held foreign currency forward contracts denominated
in euros at August 31, 2007 and August 31, 2006. The
fair value of these contracts was estimated based on quoted
market prices and the derivative liability that resulted from
the mark-to-market adjustments on these contracts was immaterial
as of August 31, 2007 and 2006. The related mark-to-market
expense is recorded as part of other income (expense).
Foreign
Currency Translation
In accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation (SFAS 52), assets and
liabilities of foreign operations are translated into
U.S. dollars at the period-end exchange rate and revenues
and expenses of foreign operations are translated into
U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the period.
Translation adjustments are not included in determining net
income for the period, but are recorded as a separate component
of shareholders equity. Foreign currency transaction gains
and losses are generated from the effects of exchange rate
changes on transactions denominated in a currency other than the
functional currency of the Company, which is the
U.S. dollar. SFAS 52 generally requires that gains and
losses on foreign currency transactions be recognized in the
determination of net income for the period. The Company records
these gains and losses in other income (expense).
The aggregate amounts of net realized and unrealized foreign
currency transaction gains were $2 million and
$1 million for the years ended August 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The Company had no realized or unrealized
foreign currency gains or losses in fiscal 2005.
Common
Stock
Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote
and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten
votes. Additionally, each share of Class B common stock may
be converted to one share of Class A common stock.
Shareholder
Rights Plan
On March 21, 2006 the Company adopted a shareholder rights
plan (the Rights Plan). Under the Rights Plan, the
Company issued a dividend distribution of one preferred share
purchase right (a Right) for each share of
Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock held by
shareholders of record as of the close of business on
April 4, 2006. The Rights generally become exercisable if a
person or group has acquired 15% or more of the Companys
outstanding common stock or announces a tender offer or exchange
offer which, if consummated, would result in ownership by a
person or group of 15% or more of the Companys outstanding
common stock (Acquiring Person).
54
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. Voting Trust and its
trustees, in their capacity as trustees, are not deemed to
beneficially own any common stock by virtue of being bound by
the Voting Trust Agreement governing the trust. Each Right
entitles shareholders to buy one one-thousandth of a share of
Series A Participating Preferred Stock (Series A
Shares) of the Company at an exercise price of $110,
subject to adjustments. Holders of Rights (other than an
Acquiring Person) are entitled to receive upon exercise
Series A Shares, or in lieu thereof, common stock of the
Company having a value of twice the Rights then-current
exercise price. The Series A Shares are not redeemable by
the Company and have voting privileges and certain dividend and
liquidation preferences. The Rights will expire on
March 21, 2016, unless such date is extended or the Rights
are redeemed or exchanged on an earlier date.
Share
Repurchases
The Company accounts for the repurchase of stock at par value.
All shares repurchased are deemed retired. Upon retirement of
the shares, the Company records the difference between the
weighted-average cost of such shares and the par value of the
stock as an adjustment to additional
paid-in-capital.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when it has a contract or
purchase order from a customer with a fixed price, the title and
risk of loss transfer to the buyer and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Title for both metal and finished steel
products transfers upon shipment, based on either cost,
insurance and freight (CIF) or free on board
(FOB) terms. A significant portion of the
Companys ferrous export sales of recycled metal are made
with letters of credit, reducing credit risk. However, domestic
recycled ferrous metal sales, nonferrous sales and sales of
finished steel are generally made on open account. For retail
sales by APB, revenues are recognized when customers pay for
parts or when wholesale products are shipped to the customer
location. Historically, there have been very few sales returns
and adjustments that impact the ultimate collection of revenues;
therefore, no provisions are made when the sale is recognized.
Freight
Costs
The Company classifies shipping and handling costs billed to
customers as revenue and the related costs incurred as a
component of cost of goods sold.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability
method. This requires the recognition of taxes currently payable
or refundable and the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that are
recognized in one reporting period on the consolidated financial
statements but in a different reporting period on the tax
returns. Tax credits are recognized as a reduction of income tax
expense in the year the credit arises. See Note 14 -
Income Taxes. A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets, including tax credits
and net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent the assets
are more likely than not to be unrealized. No valuation
allowance was required at August 31, 2007 or 2006.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and derivative
financial instruments used in hedging activities. The majority
of cash and cash equivalents are maintained with two major
financial institutions. Balances in these institutions exceeded
the FDIC insurance amount of $100,000 as of August 31, 2007
and 2006.
55
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable
is limited because a large number of geographically diverse
customers make up the Companys customer base. The Company
controls credit risk through credit approvals, credit limits,
and monitoring procedures.
The Company is also exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by counterparties on the foreign exchange
contracts used in hedging activities. These counterparties are
large international financial institutions and to date, no such
counterparty has failed to meet its financial obligations to the
Company and does not anticipate nonperformance by these
counterparties.
In addition, the Company is exposed to credit risk with respect
to open letters of credit, as most shipments to foreign
customers are supported by letters of credit. As of
August 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had less than
$1 million of open letters of credit.
Interest
and Income Taxes Paid
The Company paid $10 million, $4 million and
$1 million in interest expense during fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Additionally, during fiscal years
2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company paid $60 million,
$84 million and $77 million in income taxes,
respectively.
Earnings
per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share incorporates the incremental shares issuable
upon the assumed exercise of stock options and warrants. Certain
of the Companys stock options, RSUs and performance shares
were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share
because they were antidilutive, but these options could be
dilutive in the future. See Note 15 Earnings
and Dividends Per Share.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective September 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised
2004), Accounting for Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)), which requires the recognition
of the fair value of share-based compensation in net income. The
Company elected to utilize the modified prospective transition
method for adopting SFAS 123(R), and therefore, has not
retroactively adjusted the results of prior periods. Under this
transition method, compensation expense based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions
of SFAS 123, Accounting for Share-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123), for all
share-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet
vested, as of September 1, 2005, is being recognized in the
Companys consolidated statements of income in the periods
after the date of adoption. Share-based compensation expense for
all share-based payment awards granted after September 1,
2005 is based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). For stock
options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and
performance share awards the Company recognizes compensation
expense, net of a forfeiture rate, on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service period of the award, which is generally
the five-year vesting term for stock options and RSUs and a
three-year performance period for performance-based awards. The
Company estimated the forfeiture rate based on its historical
experience during the preceding five fiscal years.
Prior to September 1, 2005, the Company accounted for the
Plan under the intrinsic value method described in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees (APB 25). In applying the
intrinsic value method, the Company, did not record share-based
compensation cost in its consolidated statements of income
because the exercise price of its stock options equaled the
market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. The
Company recognized a liability and recorded compensation expense
due to accelerating the vesting period on stock options for
retiring employees in accordance with the provisions of APB 25
in the amount of $1 million for the year ended
August 31, 2005. The Company provided pro forma disclosure
amounts as if the fair value method defined by SFAS 123 had
been applied to its share-based compensation.
56
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company presented
the tax benefits from employee stock option plan as operating
cash flows. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123(R), tax benefits
in excess of the compensation expense recognized for those
options are classified as financing cash inflows.
SFAS 123(R) specifically require the continued disclosures
of the pro forma information for any reporting period presented,
in which any of the share-based awards were accounted for under
the intrinsic value method of APB 25. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income and basic and diluted net
income per share as if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) to its share-based
payments during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income
|
|
$
|
146,867
|
|
Add: Share based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of tax
|
|
|
673
|
|
Deduct: Total share based employee compensation benefit
(expense) under fair value based method for all awards, net of
tax
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
146,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported basic net income per share
|
|
|
$4.83
|
|
Pro forma basic net income per share
|
|
|
$4.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported diluted net income per share
|
|
|
$4.72
|
|
Pro forma diluted net income per share
|
|
|
$4.73
|
|
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan for certain
of its non-union employees. Pension benefits are based on
formulas that reflect the employees expected service
periods based on the terms of the plan and the impact of the
Companys investment and funding decisions.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87,88, 106 and 132(R),
(SFAS 158), effective August 31, 2007.
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize the funded
status of its defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit
plans as a net asset or liability in its statement of financial
position, with an offsetting amount in accumulated other
comprehensive income, and to recognize changes in that funded
status in the year in which changes occur through comprehensive
income. Following the adoption of SFAS 158, additional
minimum pension liabilities and related intangible assets are no
longer recognized. See Note 12 Employee
Benefits.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the Companys consolidated financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the U.S. of America
(U.S. GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting period. Examples include valuation of assets received
in acquisitions; revenue recognition; the allowance for doubtful
accounts; estimates of contingencies; intangible asset
valuation; inventory valuation; pension plan assumptions; and
the assessment of the valuation of deferred income taxes and
income tax contingencies. Actual results may differ from
estimated amounts.
57
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation. These changes had no impact on
previously reported operating income, net income,
shareholders equity or cash flows from operating
activities.
|
|
Note 3 -
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). This interpretation clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
entitys financial statements in accordance with
SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
financial statement recognition and disclosure of tax positions
taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. This
interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The Company will be required to adopt
FIN 48 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Management does
not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 requires public
companies to quantify errors using both a balance sheet and
income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach
results in quantifying a misstatement as material when all
relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered.
The adoption of SAB 108, by the Company at August 31,
2007 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the
reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for
that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim
period within that fiscal year. The Company will be required to
adopt SFAS 157 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.
Management is currently evaluating the requirements of
SFAS 157 and has not yet determined the impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilitiesincluding an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
establishes a fair value option under which entities can elect
to report certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value
(the fair value option), with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. Earlier application is encouraged,
provided that the reporting entity also elects to apply the
provisions of SFAS 157. SFAS 159 becomes effective for
the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Management is
currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 159 and has
not yet concluded if the fair value option will be adopted.
58
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Inventories consisted of the following at August 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Recycled metal
|
|
$
|
139,704
|
|
|
$
|
170,405
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
20,306
|
|
|
|
15,093
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
80,888
|
|
|
|
62,151
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
17,670
|
|
|
|
15,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,568
|
|
|
$
|
263,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment, Net
|
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following at
August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
$424,997
|
|
|
|
$329,348
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
152,873
|
|
|
|
110,427
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
74,526
|
|
|
|
59,497
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
12,127
|
|
|
|
65,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664,523
|
|
|
|
564,749
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(280,613
|
)
|
|
|
(251,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
$383,910
|
|
|
|
$312,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment was
$39 million, $29 million, and $20 million for
fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
|
|
Note 6
|
Investment
in and Advances to Joint Ventures
|
During fiscal 2005 and through September 30, 2005 of fiscal
2006, the Company had investments in nine joint ventures in
which it owned 50% of the joint venture interests. These joint
ventures were accounted for under the equity method of
accounting and presented as a separate reportable segment. As a
result of the Hugo Neu Corporation (HNC) separation
and termination that was completed on September 30, 2005
(See Note 7 Business Combinations), the Joint
Venture segment was eliminated and the results for the two
entities acquired in this transaction that the Company is now
managing, as well as the remaining five joint venture interests,
were consolidated into MRB. As such, the income from joint
venture amounts for fiscal 2007 and 2006 is no longer presented
separately. The Company determined that retroactively adjusting
prior period segment results for the entities acquired in this
transaction is not meaningful given that the Company was a 50%
equity partner and was not involved in managing the day-to-day
operations of these entities prior to the HNC separation.
59
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
None of the remaining joint ventures are considered individually
significant. The following tables present summarized financial
information for the Companys joint ventures in which the
Company was a partner (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
22,037
|
|
|
$
|
14,430
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
10,486
|
|
|
|
8,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,523
|
|
|
$
|
22,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
11,989
|
|
|
$
|
8,315
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Partners equity
|
|
|
19,857
|
|
|
|
14,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,523
|
|
|
$
|
22,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
68,831
|
|
|
$
|
46,016
|
|
|
$
|
2,205,460
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
10,484
|
|
|
$
|
5,903
|
|
|
$
|
143,191
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,020
|
|
|
$
|
6,365
|
|
|
$
|
144,829
|
|
|
|
Note 7 -
|
Business
Combinations
|
The Company paid a premium (i.e., goodwill) over the fair value
of the net tangible and identified assets acquired in the
transactions described below, for a number of reasons,
including, but not limited to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company will benefit from the assets and capabilities of
these acquisitions, including additional resources, skills and
industry expertise;
|
|
|
Strengthen regional product offering; and
|
|
|
Anticipated cost savings, efficiencies and synergies.
|
The acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method of
accounting and, therefore their results of operations have been
included in the Consolidated Statements of Income since their
respective acquisition dates, with the exception of two of the
entities acquired in the Hugo Neu Corporation separation and
termination agreement, discussed below.
In fiscal 2007, the Company completed the following acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2006, the Company acquired a metals recycling
business to provide additional sources of scrap metals for the
mega-shredder in Everett, Massachusetts.
|
|
|
In May 2007, the Company acquired two metals recycling
businesses that separately provide scrap metal to the Everett,
Massachusetts and Tacoma, Washington facilities.
|
Pro forma operating results for these three acquisitions are not
presented, since the aggregate results would not be
significantly different than historical results.
60
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In fiscal 2006, the Company completed the following acquisitions:
Hugo
Neu Corporation (HNC) Separation and Termination
Agreement
On September 30, 2005, the Company, HNC and certain of
their subsidiaries closed a transaction to separate and
terminate their metal recycling joint venture relationships. The
Company received the following as a result of the HNC joint
venture separation and termination:
|
|
|
|
|
Prolerized New England Company (PNE), which
comprised the joint ventures various interests in the
Northeast processing and recycling operations that primarily
operate in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Maine;
|
|
|
The assets and related liabilities of Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global
Trade related to a scrap metal business in parts of Russia and
the Baltic region, including Poland, Denmark, Finland, Norway
and Sweden. The Company entered into a non-compete agreement
with HNC that bars it from buying scrap metal in certain areas
in Russia and the Baltic region for a five-year period ending on
June 8, 2010;
|
|
|
THS Recycling LLC, dba Hawaii Metals Recycling Company
(HMR), a Hawaii metals recycling business that was
previously owned 100% by HNC; and
|
|
|
A payment of $37 million in cash received from HNC.
|
HNC received the following as a result of the HNC joint venture
separation and termination:
|
|
|
|
|
The joint venture operations in New York, New Jersey and
California, including the scrap metal processing facilities,
marine terminals and related ancillary satellite sites, the
interim New York City recycling contract, and other
miscellaneous assets; and
|
|
|
The assets and related liabilities of Hugo Neu Schnitzer Global
Trade that are not related to the Russian and Baltic region.
|
The divestiture of the Companys interest in the joint
ventures with HNC enabled the Company to expand its metals
recycling operations in the Northeastern U.S. and Hawaii.
In addition, the divestiture removed restrictions on the
Companys ability to pursue additional acquisition
opportunities.
Purchase accounting was finalized with a dispute remaining
between the Company and HNC over post closing adjustments. The
Company believes it has adequately accrued for this dispute. The
purchase price for the HNC joint venture separation and
termination was $165 million, including acquisition costs
of $6 million. Upon divestiture of the joint venture
interests, a $57 million (pre-tax) gain resulted from the
difference between the fair value and the carrying value
associated with the joint venture interests.
In accordance with Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Company elected to consolidate the results
of two of the businesses acquired through the HNC separation and
termination agreement as though the transaction had occurred at
the beginning of fiscal 2006 instead of the acquisition date.
These businesses were partially owned prior to the acquisition.
Acquisition
of GreenLeaf Auto Recyclers, LLC
(GreenLeaf)
On September 30, 2005, the Company acquired GreenLeaf and
five properties previously leased by GreenLeaf and assumed
certain GreenLeaf debt obligations for $45 million,
including acquisition costs of $1 million. The acquisition
of GreenLeaf significantly expanded the Companys national
presence in the business of auto dismantling and recycling. In
addition, the acquisition enabled the Company to enter into the
full-service segment of the recycling auto parts market that
services commercial customers.
61
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Acquisition
of Regional Recycling, LLC (Regional)
On October 31, 2005, the Company purchased substantially
all of the assets of Regional for $69 million, including
acquisition costs of $600,000, and assumed certain liabilities.
The acquisition of Regional provided the Company with a presence
in the growing markets in the Southeastern U.S. In
addition, the acquisition of Regional enhanced the
Companys ability to service domestic, and eventually,
export markets.
Acquisition
of Minority Interest in Metals Recycling, LLC
(MRL)
As a part of its joint venture relationship with HNC, the
Company indirectly owned a 30% interest in MRL, a Rhode Island
based metals recycling business; with HNC and a minority
interest owning the remaining 30% and 40% interests,
respectively. On September 30, 2005, when the Company
closed the transaction to separate and terminate its joint
venture relationship with HNC, it obtained HNCs 30%
ownership interest. On March 21, 2006, the Company
purchased the remaining 40% minority interest for
$25 million. The acquisition of the 40% minority interest
enabled the Company to fully leverage its investments in PNE and
MRL, which competed in the same geographic regions, by operating
as one business to optimize facilities and increase market share.
Summary
of Fiscal 2006 Acquisitions
The following is a summary of the fair values for the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition dates for
the above transactions (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HNC
|
|
|
GreenLeaf
|
|
|
Regional
|
|
|
MRL
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash received
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The businesses acquired from HNC and the assets acquired from
Regional and MRL are included in the Companys MRB segment.
The GreenLeaf acquisition is included in the Companys APB
segment. In accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is
not amortized and will be tested for impairment at least
annually. Goodwill recognized in connection with the HNC
separation and termination, the Regional acquisition and the
acquisition of minority interest in MRL is deductible for tax
purposes, whereas the goodwill recognized in connection with
GreenLeaf is not. Payment of the consideration for the acquired
businesses was funded by the Companys existing cash
balances and credit facility net of the $37 million in cash
received in the HNC separation and termination.
62
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following presents the details of identifiable intangible
assets acquired in 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life in
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HNC Divestiture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schnitzer Global Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
5
|
|
$
|
2,320
|
|
Purchased backlog
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
GreenLeaf:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold interests
|
|
0.25 24
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Tradename
|
|
20
|
|
|
972
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
5
|
|
|
563
|
|
Supply contracts
|
|
5
|
|
|
906
|
|
Regional:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
5
|
|
|
637
|
|
MRL:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
5
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table was prepared on a pro forma basis for the
years ended August 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as
though the acquisitions under the HNC separation and termination
and the GreenLeaf and Regional acquisitions had occurred as of
the beginning of the periods presented (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,902,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,820,858
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
150,285
|
(1)
|
|
|
140,076
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$4.91
|
|
|
|
$4.60
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$4.88
|
|
|
|
$4.50
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A tax effected gain of $35 million related to the HNC
separation and termination agreement is included in the pro
forma and actual results for the year ended August 31, 2006. |
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what
would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect for
the periods presented. In addition, the pro forma results are
not intended to be a projection of future results and do not
reflect any synergies that might be achieved from combining
operations.
63
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 8
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, Net
|
The following table presents the Companys intangible
assets and their related lives as of August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
In Years
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
$
|
277,083
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
266,675
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Identifiable intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tradename
|
|
5
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Covenants not to compete
|
|
3 6
|
|
|
11,239
|
|
|
|
(4,426
|
)
|
|
|
9,373
|
|
|
|
(2,511
|
)
|
Leasehold interests
|
|
4 27
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Lease termination fee
|
|
15
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Supply contracts
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Supply contracts
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
Land options
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
294,580
|
|
|
$
|
(5,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
280,544
|
|
|
$
|
(2,911
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting
segment for the years ended August 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MRB
|
|
|
APB
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of September 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
34,771
|
|
|
$
|
116,583
|
|
|
$
|
151,354
|
|
HNC separation and termination agreement
|
|
|
63,149
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
63,149
|
|
Acquisition of minority interest in MRL
|
|
|
17,015
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,015
|
|
GreenLeaf acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
5,300
|
|
Regional acquisition
|
|
|
28,171
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28,171
|
|
Goodwill adjustments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of August 31, 2006
|
|
|
143,106
|
|
|
|
123,569
|
|
|
|
266,675
|
|
Fiscal 2007 acquisitions
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
Goodwill adjustments
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of August 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
152,144
|
|
|
$
|
124,939
|
|
|
$
|
277,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill adjustments in fiscal 2007 and 2006 reflect
$1 million related to translation adjustments associated
with a Canadian subsidiary whose functional currency is the
Canadian dollar. In addition, APBs historical goodwill was
adjusted in fiscal 2006 when a deferred tax asset was recorded
related to an environmental liability acquired in fiscal 2005.
The excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value
of the identifiable net assets acquired of $56 million for
the HNC separation and termination was recognized as goodwill in
fiscal 2006. Goodwill in the amount of $7 million existed
on the joint ventures balance sheets prior to the
separation and termination, but was not shown
64
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
separately on the Companys balance sheet in accordance
with the equity method of accounting. Therefore, the total
increase to goodwill related to the HNC separation and
termination agreement was $63 million for fiscal 2006.
The total intangible amortization expense for the year ended
August 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $2 million,
$2 million, and $1 million, respectively. The
estimated amortization expense, based on current intangible
balances, for the next five fiscal years beginning
September 1, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
3,005
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
2012
|
|
|
342
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 -
Short-Term Borrowings
The Companys short term borrowings consist primarily of an
unsecured credit line, which was increased on March 1,
2007, by $5 million to $20 million. This line of
credit expires on March 1, 2008. Interest rates on
outstanding indebtedness under the unsecured line of credit are
set by the bank at the time of borrowing. The credit available
under this agreement is uncommitted, and as of August 31,
2007, the Company had $20 million outstanding under this
agreement. The weighted average on this line was 5.98% at
August 31, 2007. There were no amounts outstanding under
the agreement as of August 31, 2006. The credit agreement
contains various representations and warranties, events of
default and financial and other covenants, including covenants
regarding maintenance of a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio
and a maximum leverage ratio. As of August 31, 2007, the
Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
Note 10 -
Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the
following as of August 31, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Bank unsecured revolving credit facility (6.04% as of
August 31, 2007)
|
|
$
|
115,000
|
|
|
$
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt economic development revenue bonds due January 2021,
interest payable monthly at a variable rate (4.10% at
August 31, 2007), secured by a letter of credit
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (6.96% to 9.34%, due through November
2014)
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
124,354
|
|
|
|
102,929
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term and capital lease obligations, net current maturities
|
|
$
|
124,079
|
|
|
$
|
102,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2005, the Company entered into an amended and
restated unsecured committed bank credit agreement with Bank of
America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders
party thereto, which was amended in July 2007. The revised
agreement provides for a five-year, $450 million revolving
credit facility maturing in July 2012. Interest rates on
outstanding indebtedness under the amended agreement are based,
at the Companys option,
65
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
on either the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
plus a spread of between 0.50% and 1.00%, with the amount of the
spread based on a pricing grid tied to the Companys
leverage ratio, or the greater of the prime rate or the federal
funds rate plus 0.50%. In addition, annual commitment fees are
payable on the unused portion of the credit facility at rates
between 0.10% and 0.25% based on a pricing grid tied to the
Companys leverage ratio.
As of August 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company had borrowings
outstanding under the credit facility of $115 million and
$95 million, respectively. Additionally, as of
August 31, 2007 and 2006 the Company had $8 million of
long-term
bonded indebtedness that matures in January 2021.
The bank credit agreement contains various representations and
warranties, events of default and financial and other covenants,
including covenants regarding maintenance of a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. As of
August 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all
such covenants.
As of August 31, 2007 the Company had three capital lease
agreements for use of equipment that expire at various dates
through November 2014. As of August 31, 2007, the Company
had $2 million of assets that were accounted for as capital
leases which were included in Property, plant and
equipment machinery and equipment on the
consolidated balance sheet. There were no significant capital
leases as of August 31, 2006.
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease
obligations during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
Capital Lease
|
|
|
|
|
August 31:
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
2009
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
2010
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
2012
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
115,255
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
8,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,876
|
|
|
$
|
2,011
|
|
|
$
|
124,887
|
|
Amounts representing interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122,876
|
|
|
$
|
1,478
|
|
|
$
|
124,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
The Company leases a portion of its capital equipment and
certain of its facilities under leases that expire at various
dates through December 26, 2026. Rent expense was
$18 million, $13 million and $8 million for
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. See discussion of
leases with related parties in Note 16 - Related Party
Transactions.
SMB has a take-or-pay natural gas contract that expires on
May 31, 2011 and obligates it to purchase a minimum of
3,435 million British thermal units (MMBTU) per
day at tiered pricing, whether or not the amount is utilized.
The blended rate for the period from November 1, 2006
through October 31, 2007 was $8.22 per MMBTU. Effective for
the delivery period from November 1, 2007 through
October 31, 2008, the blended rate for natural gas
decreased from $8.22 per MMBTU per day to $7.70 per MMBTU per
day. The derivative mark-to-market charge incurred on the
difference between natural gas market prices and the contract
price has not been material to date. SMB also has an electricity
contract with McMinnville Water and Light that requires a
minimum purchase of electricity at a rate subject to variable
pricing, whether or not the amount is utilized. The contract
expires in September 2011.
66
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The table below sets forth the Companys future minimum
obligations under non-cancelable operating leases from unrelated
parties, service obligations and purchase commitments as of
August 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
11,995
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
$
|
13,909
|
|
|
$
|
27,867
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,446
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
12,740
|
|
|
|
25,148
|
|
2010
|
|
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
12,740
|
|
|
|
20,857
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,307
|
|
|
|
16,127
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
4,513
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,538
|
|
|
$
|
4,579
|
|
|
$
|
50,645
|
|
|
$
|
100,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies-Environmental
The Company evaluates the adequacy of its environmental reserves
on a quarterly basis in accordance with Company policy.
Adjustments to the liabilities are made when additional
information becomes available that affects the estimated costs
to study or remediate any environmental issues or expenditures
for which reserves were established are made.
Changes in the Companys environmental reserves are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Established,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Established,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Reporting Segment
|
|
9/1/2005
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
8/31/2006
|
|
|
Net(1)
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
8/31/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
15,383
|
|
|
$
|
15,345
|
|
|
$
|
(7,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,125
|
|
|
$
|
2,241
|
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
12,777
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,277
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,883
|
|
|
$
|
28,122
|
|
|
$
|
(7,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,402
|
|
|
$
|
2,241
|
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
During fiscal 2007, the Company
recorded $4 million in environmental reserves related to its
2007 acquisitions. Additionally, the Company released $2 million
of the reserves as the result of mitigating environmental
concerns at one of its MRB locations.
|
Metals
Recycling Business
At August 31, 2007, MRBs environmental reserves
consisted primarily of the reserves established in connection
with the Hylebos Waterway, the Portland Harbor and various
acquisitions consummated in fiscal 2007 and 2006.
Hylebos
Waterway.
In fiscal 1982, the Company was notified by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) that it was one of 60
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) for the
investigation and
clean-up of
contaminated sediment along the Hylebos Waterway. On
March 25, 2002, the EPA issued Unilateral Administrative
Orders to the Company and another party (the Other
Party) to proceed with Remedial Design and Remedial Action
(RD/RA) for the head of the Hylebos and to two other
parties to proceed with the RD/RA for the balance of the
waterway. The Unilateral Administrative Order for the head of
the Hylebos Waterway was converted to a voluntary consent decree
in 2004, pursuant to which the Company and the Other Party
agreed to remediate the head of the Hylebos Waterway. During the
second phase or the dredging in the head of the Hylebos
Waterway, which began in July 2004, the Company
67
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
incurred remediation costs of $16 million during fiscal
2005. The Companys cost estimates were based on the
assumption that dredge removal of contaminated sediments would
be accomplished within one dredge season, from July 2004 to
February 2005. However; due to a variety of factors, including
dredge contractor operational issues and other dredge related
delays, the dredging was not completed during the first dredge
season. As a result, the Company recorded environmental charges
of $14 million in fiscal 2005, primarily to account for
additional estimated costs to complete this work during a second
dredging season. The Company and the Other Party then incurred
additional remediation costs of $7 million during fiscal
2006. The Company and the Other Party filed a complaint in the
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
at Tacoma against the dredge contractor to recover damages and a
significant portion of cost overruns incurred in the second
dredging season to complete the project. Following a trial that
concluded in February 2007, a jury awarded the Company and the
Other Party damages in the amount of $6 million. The
judgment has been appealed by the dredge contractor, and
enforcement of the judgment is stayed pending the appeal. No
accrual or reduction of liabilities is recorded until all legal
options have been resolved and the award is certain and deemed
collectible. The Company and the Other Party also pursued
settlement negotiations with and a legal action against other
non-settling, non-performing PRPs to recover additional amounts.
As of August 31, 2007, environmental reserves for the
Hylebos Waterway aggregated $4 million.
Portland
Harbor.
In fiscal 2006, the Company was notified by the EPA under CERCLA
that it was one of at least 69 PRPs that own or operate or
formerly owned or operated sites adjacent to the Portland Harbor
Superfund site. The precise nature and extent of any
clean-up of
the Portland Harbor, the parties to be involved, the process to
be followed for any
clean-up and
the allocation of any costs for the
clean-up
among responsible parties have not yet been determined. It is
unclear whether or to what extent the Company will be liable for
environmental costs or damages associated with the Superfund
site. It is also unclear to what extent natural resource damage
claims or third party contribution or damage claims will be
asserted against the Company. While the Company participated in
certain preliminary Portland Harbor study efforts, they are not
parties to the consent order entered into by the EPA with other
certain PRPs, referred to as the Lower Willamette
Group (LWG), for a remedial
investigation/feasibility study; however, the Company could
become liable for a share of the costs of this study at a later
stage of the proceedings.
During fiscal 2006, the Company received letters from the LWG
and one of its members with respect to participating in the LWG
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) and
demands from various parties in connection with environmental
response costs allegedly incurred in investigating contamination
at the Portland Harbor Superfund site. In an effort to develop a
coordinated strategy and response to these demands, the Company
joined with more than twenty other newly-noticed parties to form
the Blue Water Group (BWG). All members of the BWG
declined to join the LWG. As a result of discussions between the
BWG, LWG, EPA and the Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) regarding a potential cash contribution to the
RI/FS, certain members of the BWG, including the Company, have
agreed to an interim settlement with the LWG under which the
Company would contribute toward the BWGs total settlement
amount.
The DEQ is performing investigations involving the Company sites
which are focused on controlling any current releases of
contaminants into the Willamette River. The cost of the
investigations and remediation associated with these properties
and the cost of employment of source control Best Management
Practices, is not reasonably estimable until the completion of
the data review and further investigations now being conducted
by the LWG. In fiscal 2006 the Company recorded a liability for
its estimated share of the costs of the investigation incurred
by the LWG to date. The Companys estimated share of these
costs is not considered to be material. The Company has reserved
$1 million for future investigation costs of the Portland
Harbor.
Other
Metals Recycling Business Sites.
During fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company conducted
environmental due diligence investigations in connection with
the HNC, Regional, MRL and other MRB acquisitions. As a result
of these investigations, the
68
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company identified certain environmental risks and accrued for
its share of the estimated costs to remediate these risks. These
reserves were recorded as part of purchase accounting for the
acquisitions. No environmental compliance proceedings are
pending with respect to any of these sites. As of
August 31, 2007, environmental reserves for theses sites
aggregated $20 million. The Companys environmental
reserves also include amounts for potential future
clean-up of
other sites at which the Company or its subsidiaries have
conducted business or allegedly disposed of other materials.
Auto
Parts Business
From fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2006, the Company completed four
acquisitions of businesses within the APB segment. At the time
of each acquisition, the Company conducted environmental due
diligence investigations related to locations involved in the
acquisition. APB recorded a reserve for the estimated cost to
address any environmental matters identified as a result of
these investigations. The reserve is evaluated quarterly
according to Company policy. As of August 31, 2007,
environmental reserves for APB aggregated $18 million,
which includes an environmental reserve of $13 million for
the GreenLeaf acquisition. No environmental enforcement
proceedings are pending with respect to any of these sites and
no amounts were charged to these reserves in fiscal 2007.
Steel
Manufacturing Business
SMBs electric arc furnace generates dust (EAF
dust) that is classified as hazardous waste by the EPA
because of its zinc and lead content. As a result, the Company
captures the EAF dust and ships it via specialized rail cars to
a domestic firm that applies a treatment that allows the EAF
dust to be delisted as hazardous waste so it can be disposed of
as a non-hazardous solid waste.
SMB has an operating permit issued under Title V of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, which governs certain air
quality standards. The permit was first issued in fiscal 1998
and has since been renewed through fiscal year 2012. The permit
allows SMB to produce up to 950,000 tons of billets per year and
allows varying rolling mill production levels based on levels of
emissions.
Contingencies-Other
On October 16, 2006, the Company finalized settlements with
the DOJ and the SEC resolving an investigation related to a past
practice of making improper payments to the purchasing managers
of the Companys customers in Asia in connection with
export sales of recycled ferrous metal. Under the settlement,
the Company agreed to a deferred prosecution agreement with the
DOJ (the Deferred Prosecution Agreement) and agreed
to an order, issued by the SEC, instituting
cease-and-desist
proceedings, making findings and imposing a
cease-and-desist
order pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Order). Under the Deferred
Prosecution Agreement, the DOJ will not prosecute the Company if
the Company meets the conditions of the agreement for a period
of three years including, among other things, that the Company
engage a compliance consultant to advise its compliance officer
and its Board of Directors on the Companys compliance
program. Under the Order, the Company agreed to
cease-and-desist
from the past practices that were the subject of the
investigation and to disgorge $8 million of profits and
prejudgment interest. The Order also contains provisions
comparable to those in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement
regarding the engagement of the compliance consultant. In
addition, under the settlement, the Companys Korean
subsidiary, SSI International Far East, Ltd., pled guilty to
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act anti-bribery and books and records
provisions, conspiracy and wire fraud charges and paid a fine of
$7 million. These amounts were accrued during fiscal 2006
and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2007. The investigation
settlement in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 did not affect
the Companys previously reported financial results. Under
the settlement, the Company has agreed to cooperate fully with
any ongoing, related DOJ and SEC investigations.
69
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company has incurred expenses, and may incur further
expenses, in connection with the advancement of funds to, or
indemnification of, individuals involved in such investigations.
Under the terms of its corporate bylaws, the Company is
obligated to indemnify all current and former officers or
directors involved in civil, criminal or investigative matters
in connection with their service. The Company is also obligated
to advance fees and expenses to such persons in advance of a
final disposition of such matters, but only if the involved
officer or director affirms a good faith belief of entitlement
to indemnification and undertakes to repay such advance if it is
ultimately determined by a court that such person is not
entitled to be indemnified. The Company also has the option to
indemnify employees and to advance fees and expenses, but only
if the involved employees furnish the Company with the same
written affirmation and undertaking. There is no limit on the
indemnification payments the Company could be required to make
under these provisions. The Company did not record a liability
for these indemnification obligations based on the fact that
they are employment-related costs. At this time, the Company
does not believe that any indemnity payments the Company may be
required to make will be material.
Note 12 -
Employee Benefits
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have qualified and
nonqualified retirement plans covering substantially all
employees of these companies. These plans include a defined
benefit plan, a supplemental executive retirement benefit plan,
defined contribution plans, and multiemployer pension plans.
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement
Benefit Plan (SERBP)
For certain nonunion employees, the Company maintains a defined
benefit pension plan. Effective June 30, 2006, the Company
made the decision to freeze the defined benefit plan and cease
the accrual of further benefits. The defined benefit plan freeze
qualified as a plan curtailment under SFAS No. 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlements and
Curtailments of Defined Benefit Plans and for Termination of
Benefits (SFAS 88). In accordance with
SFAS 88, the Company recognized an insignificant
curtailment loss equal to the unrecognized prior service cost
associated with the years of service no longer expected to be
rendered as the result of the curtailment.
In addition, the Company has adopted a nonqualified SERBP for
certain executives. A restricted trust fund has been established
and invested in life insurance policies which can be used for
plan benefits, but are subject to claims of general creditors.
The trust fund is classified as other assets and the pension
liability is classified as other long-term liabilities. The
trust fund assets stock market gains and losses are
included in other income (expense). As an unfunded plan,
contributions are defined as benefit payments made to plan
beneficiaries.
The Company adopted SFAS 158 on August 31, 2007 for
both its defined benefit pension plan and its SERBP.
SFAS 158 requires an entity to (i) recognize in its
statement of financial position an asset for its defined benefit
pension and postretirement benefit plans overfunded status or a
liability for a plans underfunded status,
(ii) measure a defined benefit pension and postretirement
benefit plans assets and obligations that determine its
funded status as of the end of the employers fiscal year,
and (iii) recognize changes in the funded status of the
defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans in
comprehensive income in the year in which the changes occur. The
requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of
the date of the fiscal year-end statement of financial position
is consistent with the Companys current accounting
treatment. Following the adoption of SFAS 158, additional
minimum pension liabilities and related intangible assets are no
longer recognized. The provisions of SFAS 158 are to be
applied on a prospective basis; therefore, prior periods
presented are not retroactively adjusted.
70
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The adoption of SFAS 158 resulted in the following impact
on the consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
|
SFAS 158
|
|
|
After the
|
|
|
|
Adoption of
|
|
|
Adoption
|
|
|
Adoption of
|
|
|
|
SFAS 158
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debit/(credit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (net pension asset, long-term)
|
|
$
|
3,028
|
|
|
$
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,360
|
|
Other accrued liabilities (current)
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(145
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes, net (long-term)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income - pension (net of tax)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
The asset value of the plan is based on the market value which
represents its fair value. The following table sets forth the
change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and funded
status at August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan
|
|
|
SERBP
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
13,752
|
|
|
$
|
13,141
|
|
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
$
|
1,988
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Transfers/acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,576
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(1,358
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
13,492
|
|
|
$
|
13,752
|
|
|
$
|
2,073
|
|
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
13,938
|
|
|
$
|
12,931
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Transfers/acquisitions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(1,358
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
14,852
|
|
|
$
|
13,938
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets, in excess of benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
1,360
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
(2,073
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,026
|
)
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
1,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,024
|
|
|
$
|
(2,073
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of
the following at August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan
|
|
|
SERBP
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other assets (net pension asset, long-term)
|
|
$
|
1,360
|
|
|
$
|
3,024
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Restricted Trust Fund
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
Other accrued liabilities (current)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
(2,299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
$
|
1,668
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(354
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Prior service cost (benefit)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Estimated amount of net gain or loss, net prior service cost,
and transition obligation remaining in Other Comprehensive
Income expected to be recognised as a component of net periodic
benefit cost in fiscal 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
SERBP
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Components of net periodic pension benefit cost at August 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan
|
|
|
SERBP
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
(840
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of past service cost
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost (income)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,249
|
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine pension benefit
obligations for the defined benefit pension plan and SERBP were
as follows at August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan
|
|
|
SERBP
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
Interest to convert Defined Contribution accounts
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
pension benefit cost for the defined benefit pension plan and
SERBP were as follows for years ended August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
72
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension
plan assets, the Company considers the current and expected
asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on
various categories of plan assets. The Company applies the
expected rate of return to a market related value of the assets
which reduces the underlying variability in assets to which the
Company applies that expected return. The Company amortizes
gains and losses as well as the effects of changes in actuarial
assumptions and plan provisions over a period no longer than the
average future service of employees.
Actuarial
assumptions
Primary actuarial assumptions are determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on
the Companys estimate of long-term returns for equities
and fixed income securities weighted by the allocation of assets
in the plans. The rate is impacted by changes in general market
conditions, but because it represents a long-term rate, it is
not significantly impacted by short-term market swings. Changes
in the allocation of plan assets would also impact this rate.
|
|
|
The assumed discount rate is used to discount future benefit
obligations back to todays dollars. The discount rate is
reflective of yield rates on U.S. long-term investment
grade corporate bonds on and around the August 31 valuation
date. This rate is sensitive to changes in interest rates. A
decrease in the discount rate would increase the Companys
obligation and expense.
|
|
|
Effective June 30, 2006, the Company ceased the accrual of
further benefits under the defined benefit plan, and thus the
expected rate of compensation increase is no longer applicable
in calculating benefit obligations.
|
Plan
asset allocations
The Companys asset allocation for its defined benefit
pension plan is based on the primary goal of maximizing
investment returns over the long term. At the same time, the
Company has invested in a diversified portfolio so as to provide
a balance of returns and risk. In an effort to quantify this
allocation, the Companys Plan Committee has established a
target guideline to be used in determining the investment mix.
The table below shows the Companys target allocation range
along with the actual allocations for the defined benefit
pension plan at August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual 2007
|
|
|
Actual 2006
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
70-90
|
%
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
72%
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
0-10
|
%
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
0-25
|
%
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not set target allocations for the SERBP.
The table below exhibits the accumulated benefit obligation
measured as of August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan
|
|
SERBP
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
13,492
|
|
|
$
|
13,752
|
|
|
$
|
1,992
|
|
|
$
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contributions
The Company expects to make no contributions to its defined
benefit pension plan in fiscal 2008, as the plan was frozen as
of June 30, 2006. The Company expects to make $145,000 in
contributions to the SERBP plan in fiscal 2008.
Estimated
Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
|
SERBP
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,813
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
2010
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
2011
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,292
|
|
|
$
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
The Company has several defined contribution plans covering
nonunion employees. Contributions to these plans totaled
$4 million, $2 million and $1 million for fiscal
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Multiemployer
Pension Plans
In accordance with its collective bargaining agreements, the
Company contributed $4 million, $3 million and
$3 million per year to multiemployer pension plans during
fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005. The Company is not the sponsor or
administrator of these multiemployer plans. Contributions were
determined in accordance with provisions of negotiated labor
contracts.
The Company learned during fiscal 2004 that one of the
multiemployer plans in which SMB is a participating employer
would not meet Employee Retirement Incentive Security Act of
1974 (ERISA) minimum funding standards for the plan
year ending September 30, 2004. The trustees of that plan
applied to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for
certain relief from this minimum funding standard. The IRS
indicated a willingness to consider granting the relief provided
the plans contributing employers, including the Company,
agreed to increased contributions. The increased contributions
were estimated to average 6% per year, compounded annually,
until the plan reaches the funded status required by the IRS.
These increases were based on the Companys current
contribution level to the plan of approximately $2 million
per year. Based on commitments from the majority of employers
participating in the Plan to make the increased contributions,
the Plan Trustees proceeded with the relief request, and in
August 2006 received formal approval from the IRS. Based on this
approval, in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2006, the Company
reversed approximately $1 million in charges that had been
accrued in fiscal 2004 for the Companys estimated share of
additional contributions or excise taxes that would have been
required had the IRS approval not been received.
The Company has contingent liabilities for its share of the
unfunded liabilities of each plan to which it contributes. The
Companys contingent liability for a plan would be
triggered if it were to withdraw from that plan. The
74
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Company has no current intention of withdrawing from any of the
plans. The Company is unable to determine its relative portion
of, or estimate its future liability under, these plans.
Note 13
Share-Based Compensation
The Company adopted the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plan) for its employees, consultants, and directors.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, as amended, the Company
is authorized to issue up to 7.2 million shares of
Class A Common Stock for any awards issued under the Plan.
At the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Companys
shareholders approved amendments to the Plan to
(a) authorize the grant of performance-based long-term
incentive awards (performance-based awards) under
the Plan that would be eligible for treatment as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and (b) increase the
per-employee limit on grants of options and stock appreciation
rights under the Plan from 100,000 shares to
150,000 shares annually. The amendments did not include any
increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the
Plan.
Stock
Options
Under the Plan, stock options are granted to employees at
exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the
Companys stock at the dates of grant at the sole
discretion of the Board of Directors.
Generally, stock options vest ratably over a five-year period
from the date of grant and have a contractual term of ten years.
The fair value of each option grant under the Plan was estimated
at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing
Model (Black-Scholes), which utilizes assumptions
related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend
yield, and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities
utilized in the model are based on the historical volatility of
the Companys stock price. The risk-free interest rate is
derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant. The expected lives of the grants are based on
historical exercise patterns and post-vesting termination
behavior.
As described above, the fair value of stock options granted
during the following years ended August 31 was determined using
the Black-Scholes with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Risk-free interest rate stock options
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.83%
|
|
3.90%
|
Dividend yields
|
|
N/A
|
|
1.00%
|
|
1.00%
|
Weighted-average expected life of stock options (in years)
|
|
N/A
|
|
6.6
|
|
6.5
|
Price Volatility stock options
|
|
N/A
|
|
46%
|
|
48%
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the
|
|
N/A
|
|
$16.43
|
|
$12.37
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No options were granted in fiscal 2007. |
75
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A summary of the Companys stock option activity and
related information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term (in years)
|
|
(in 000s)
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
$
|
12.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
34.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
8.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited/canceled
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
12.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2006
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
26.06
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
$
|
6,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at August 31, 2006
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
17.87
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
$
|
4,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2006
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
$
|
26.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
12.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited/canceled
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
33.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2007
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
24.84
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
$
|
17,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at August 31, 2007
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
22.10
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
$
|
10,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 9, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors approved modifications to the award agreements for
options outstanding under the Plan, to provide for accelerated
vesting upon the death, disability or retirement of the optionee
or upon a change in control of the Company. The definition of
the term disability was broadened. This modification
affected 18 employees and resulted in an incremental
increase in stock option compensation expense of $1 million
in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.
As of August 31, 2007, the total number of unvested stock
options was 248,825 shares. The aggregate intrinsic value
in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
that would have been received by the option holders had all
option holders exercised their options on August 31, 2007.
Aggregate intrinsic value was calculated as the difference
between the Companys closing stock price on the last
trading day of fiscal 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by
the number of in-the-money options. Total intrinsic value of
stock options exercised was $4 million, $12 million,
and $4 million for the years ended August 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively. The total fair value of stock
options vested during the fiscal years ended August 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005 was $1 million, $2 million, and
$1 million, respectively. The Company recognized
compensation expense associated with stock options of
$3 million and $2 million for fiscal 2007 and 2006,
respectively. As of August 31, 2007, the total remaining
unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock
options amounted to $3 million. The weighted-average
remaining requisite service period of the non-vested stock
options was approximately 2.7 years. Total proceeds
received from option exercises for the years ended
August 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $2 million,
$4 million, and $1 million, respectively. The tax
benefits realized from the option exercises of the share-based
payment awards for fiscal 2007 and 2006 were $1 million and
$4 million, respectively. In fiscal year 2005, the Company
recorded cumulative tax benefits from exercises of employee
stock options of $14 million on original or amended income
tax returns the amounts the employees would report as ordinary
income.
Restricted
Stock Units
In connection with the approval of stock option awards by the
Compensation Committee on July 25, 2006, the Committee
authorized the Company to permit option grantees to elect to
receive the value of the option awards in restricted shares of
Class A common stock of the Company. In October 2006, the
Company commenced a tender
76
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
offer under which the recipients of the July 25, 2006
option grants were allowed to exchange the options for RSUs on a
2:1 basis, an exchange ratio determined to be equivalent under a
Black-Scholes pricing model. The RSUs vest on the same schedule
as the options granted on July 25, 2006. As of the close of
the tender offer on November 6, 2006, stock options for
272,000 shares were exchanged for 136,000 RSUs. The
estimated fair value of the RSUs issued on November 7, 2006
was $5 million based on the market closing price of the
underlying Class A common stock on November 6, 2006 of
$37.65. As a result of the exchange, the Company estimated the
incremental compensation expense to be $541,000, which is being
recognized over the remaining portion of the five-year vesting
term of the RSUs.
On June 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted awards
for 50,000 RSUs to an executive officer and another officer
under the terms of their employment agreements, which vest 25%
in June 2007, 25% in June 2008 and 50% in June 2009. Vesting of
25,000 shares is based on continued employment, and the
remaining 25,000 shares vest based on performance metrics
approved by the Committee. The estimated fair value of the RSUs
issued on June 27, 2007 was $2 million based on the
market closing price of the underlying Class A common stock
on June 27, 2007 of $47.25.
On August 9, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted
103,578 RSUs to its key employees and officers under the 1993
plan. The RSUs have a five-year term and vest 20% per year over
five years commencing June 1, 2008. The Committee also
approved amendments to the definition of the term
disability in the existing RSU award agreements The
estimated fair value of the RSUs granted on August 9, 2007
was $5 million based on the market closing price of the
underlying Class A common stock on August 9, 2007 of
$51.34.
A summary of the Companys RSUs and related information is
as follows for the year ended August 31, 2007 (in thousands
except weighted average of grant fair values):
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at beginning of year
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
290
|
|
Vested/Paid (net of payroll taxes)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at end of year
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of fair value grant
|
|
$
|
44.94
|
|
The total fair value of RSU shares vested in fiscal 2007 was
$1 million. The Company recognized compensation expense
associated with RSU shares of $2 million in fiscal 2007. As
of August 31, 2007, total remaining unrecognized
compensation expense related to unvested RSUs was
$9 million, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.8 years.
The RSU agreements provide for accelerated vesting upon death,
disability or retirement of the holder or upon a change in
control of the Company. The accelerated vesting clause affected
27 employees who received RSU awards and resulted in an
incremental increase in RSU compensation expense of
$1 million in fiscal 2007.
Long-Term
Incentive Plan
The Plan authorizes performance-based awards to certain
employees subject to certain conditions and restrictions. A
participant generally must be employed by the Company on October
31 following the end of the performance period to receive an
award payout, although adjusted awards will be paid if
employment terminates earlier on account of death, disability,
retirement, termination without cause after the first year of
the performance period or a sale of the Company. Awards will be
paid in Class A common stock as soon as practicable after
October 31 following the end of the performance period.
77
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fiscal
2006 2008 Long-Term Incentive Awards
On November 29, 2005, the Companys Compensation
Committee approved performance-based awards under the Plan. The
Compensation Committee approved additional awards on the same
terms to two executive officers and one officer in a division on
January 30, 2006 and April 28, 2006, respectively.
The Compensation Committee established a series of performance
targets, which include the Companys total shareholder
return (TSR) for the performance period relative to
the S&P 500 Industrials (weighted at 50%) (TSR
Awards), the operating income per ton of MRB for the
performance period (weighted at
162/3%),
the number of Economic Value Added (EVA) positive
stores of APB for the last year of the performance period
(weighted at
162/3%),
and the man hours per ton of the SMB for the performance period
(weighted at
162/3%),
corresponding to award payouts ranging from 25% to 300% of the
weighted portions of the target awards (Performance
Awards, collectively). For participants who work
exclusively in one business segment, the awards are weighted 50%
on the performance measure for their segment and 50% on total
shareholder return. A participant generally must be employed by
the Company on October 31 following the end of the performance
period to receive an award payout, although pro-rated awards
will be paid if employment terminates earlier on account of
death, disability, retirement, termination without cause after
the first year of the performance period, or a sale of the
Company or the business segment for which a participant works.
Awards will be paid in the Companys Class A Common
Stock as soon as practicable after October 31 following the end
of the performance period.
The fair value of Performance Awards granted during the periods
was determined by multiplying the total number of shares
expected to be issued by the Companys closing stock price
as of the date of the grant and is being recognized over the
requisite service period of 2.9 years. The weighted average
fair value of Performance Awards granted during fiscal 2006 was
$34.27.
The fair value of TSR Performance Awards granted during the year
ended August 31, 2006 was determined using a Monte Carlo
simulation model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
5%
|
Dividend yields
|
|
0.20%
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected life (years)
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of TSR performance awards
|
|
$ 52.04
|
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R),
compensation expense related to the TSR award, which has market
conditions, will be recognized over the requisite service period
and will only be adjusted if the requisite service is not
rendered.
Fiscal
2007 2009 Long-Term Incentive Awards
On November 27, 2006, the Companys Compensation
Committee approved performance-based awards under the Plan. The
Compensation Committee established a series of performance
targets based on the Companys average growth in earnings
per share (weighted at 50%) and the Companys average
return on capital employed (weighted at 50%), for the three
years of the performance period corresponding to award payouts
ranging from threshold at 50% to maximum at 200% of the weighted
portions of the target awards. For measuring earnings per share
growth in fiscal 2007, the Compensation Committee set the fiscal
2006 diluted earnings per share amount lower than the actual
amount, reflecting the elimination of certain large nonrecurring
items. The weighted average fair value of Performance Awards
granted during fiscal 2007 was $39.72.
78
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Performance Awards activity under the Plan as of and during
fiscal 2007 was as follows for all LTIP performance awards
(number of awards in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended August 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2006
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
43.15
|
|
Performance awards granted
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance awards forfeited
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at August 31, 2007
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
41.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense associated with Performance Awards for
fiscal 2007 and 2006 was calculated assuming all performance
targets were met. Compensation expense for anticipated awards
based upon the Companys financial performance was
$3 million in 2007 and $1 million in 2006. As of
August 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation expense related
to non-vested performance shares was $16 million, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.8 years.
In August, 2007 the Compensation Committee approved amendments
to the definition of the term disability in the
existing agreements for Performance Awards.
Deferred
Stock Units
On July 26, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors in
conjunction with authorizing the issuance of Deferred Stock
Units (DSUs) to non-employee directors as the form
of the restricted stock awards approved by the Board in July
2005. One DSU gives the director the right to receive one share
of Class A Common Stock at a future date. Annually,
immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders
(commencing with the 2007 annual meeting), each non-employee
director will receive DSUs for a number of shares equal to
$87,500 ($131,250 for the Chairman of the Board) divided by the
closing market price of the Class A Common Stock on the
grant date. The DSUs will become fully vested on the day before
the next annual meeting, subject to continued service on the
Board. The DSUs will also become fully vested on the death or
disability of a director or a change in control of the Company
(as defined in the DSU award agreement).
After the DSUs have become vested, directors will be credited
with additional whole or fractional shares to reflect dividends
that would have been paid on the stock subject to the DSUs. The
Company will issue Class A Common Stock to a director
pursuant to vested DSUs in a lump sum in January after the
director ceases to be a director of the Company, subject to the
right of the director to elect an installment payment program
under the Companys Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors.
In order to move from a cycle of granting non-employee director
equity awards each year in June to a cycle of granting the
awards in January at the time of the annual meeting, the Company
granted a one-time award of DSUs to each non-employee director,
effective as of August 31, 2006. The one-time grants were
for the number of DSUs equal to $43,750 ($65,625 for the
Chairman of the Board) divided by the closing market price of
the Class A Common Stock on August 31, 2006. On
August 31, 2006, the total number of DSUs granted was
14,000 shares. These DSUs became fully vested on
January 31, 2007. The Company recognized $1 million
compensation expense for these DSUs for the year ended
August 31, 2007.
On January 31, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted
DSUs to each of its non-employee directors. Each grant was equal
to $87,500 ($131,250 for the Chairman of the Board) divided by
the closing market price of the Class A common stock on
January 31, 2007. The total number of DSUs granted on
January 31, 2007 was 23,864 shares. The DSUs will
become fully vested on the day before the 2008 annual meeting,
subject to continued Board service. The
79
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
compensation expense associated with the DSUs granted will be
recognized over the respective requisite service periods of the
awards. The Company recognized $1 million in compensation
expense for these DSUs for the year ended August 31, 2007.
Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following at
August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
61,728
|
|
|
$
|
86,713
|
|
|
$
|
70,726
|
|
State
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
67,199
|
|
|
|
93,482
|
|
|
|
78,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
8,014
|
|
|
|
(6,353
|
)
|
|
|
3,786
|
|
State
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(1,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
8,134
|
|
|
|
(6,611
|
)
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
75,333
|
|
|
$
|
86,871
|
|
|
$
|
81,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities were comprised of the
following at August 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
$
|
12,879
|
|
|
$
|
13,262
|
|
Employee benefit accruals
|
|
|
6,695
|
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
6,297
|
|
|
|
7,990
|
|
State income tax and other
|
|
|
4,730
|
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
Inventory valuation methods
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
California Enterprise Zone credit carryforward
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
32,812
|
|
|
|
33,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation and basis differences
|
|
|
40,400
|
|
|
|
33,144
|
|
Prepaid expense acceleration
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
44,047
|
|
|
|
36,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
11,235
|
|
|
$
|
2,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Income tax expense differs from the amount that would result by
applying the U.S. statutory rate to earnings before taxes.
A reconciliation of the difference at August 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraterritorial income exclusion
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible fine
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 199 deduction and other
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers compensation
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
36.1
|
%
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax rates were 36.1%, 37.5% and 35.3% for fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively. The tax rate in fiscal 2006 was higher
than in fiscal 2007 primarily because of an accrual recorded in
fiscal 2006 of $14 million for nondeductible penalties and
profits disgorgement expensed in connection with the settlement
of the SEC and DOJ investigations. The nondeductible expense
increased the fiscal 2006 tax rate by 2.1%. In addition, the
fiscal 2006 tax rate was higher than normal because it included
an estimated tax rate of 38.0% for the non-recurring
$57 million gain arising from the HNC separation and
termination (see Note 7 Business Combinations),
a tax rate that was higher than the rate applicable to the
Companys recurring income.
The Company acquired the net operating losses (NOLs)
of PNE when it was acquired in fiscal 1996. The remaining
$6 million of PNE NOLs at August 31, 2007 will expire
in fiscal 2012 if unused. The Company acquired the NOLs of
GreenLeaf when it was acquired in fiscal 2006. The remaining
$12 million of GreenLeaf NOLs at August 31, 2007, will
expire in fiscal 2024 if unused. Annual use of the PNE and
GreenLeaf NOLs is limited by Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code. No valuation allowances have been established to
offset the PNE or GreenLeaf NOLs because management believes
that it is more like likely than not that future taxable income
will be sufficient to absorb the NOLs in their entirety.
81
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Note 15 -
|
Earnings
and Dividends Per Share
|
The following table sets forth the reconciliation from basic net
income per share to diluted net income per share for the years
ended August 31 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
131,334
|
|
|
$
|
143,068
|
|
|
$
|
146,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
29,997
|
|
|
|
30,597
|
|
|
|
30,427
|
|
Incremental common shares attributable to dilutive stock options
and LTIP awards
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
30,400
|
|
|
|
30,796
|
|
|
|
31,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
4.38
|
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
4.32
|
|
|
$
|
4.65
|
|
|
$
|
4.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
$
|
0.068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for earnings per share in accordance with
SFAS 128, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings
per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the periods
presented and vested DSUs. Diluted earnings per share is
computed using net income and the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding, assuming dilution. Potentially
dilutive common shares include the assumed exercise of stock
options and assumed vesting of performance shares and DSU and
RSU awards using the treasury stock method. Stock options
totaling 200,000 and 600,000 shares as of August 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively, were excluded from the calculation
of diluted earnings per share because the options were
anti-dilutive.
|
|
Note 16 -
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
The Company purchases recycled metal from its joint venture
operations at prices that approximate fair market value. These
purchases totaled $19 million, $12 million and
$14 million for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Advances to these joint ventures were $48,000 and
$2 million as of August 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. In addition, payments from these joint ventures
amounted to $2 million and $250,000 for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Included in
other assets are notes receivable from joint venture businesses
of $312,000 at August 31, 2007 and $1 million as
August 31, 2006.
Thomas D. Klauer, Jr., President of the Companys Auto
Parts Business, is the sole shareholder of a corporation that is
the 25% minority partner in a partnership with the Company. This
partnership operates four self-service stores in Northern
California. Mr. Klauers 25% share of the profits of
this partnership totaled $1 million in fiscal years 2007
and 2006 and $2 million in fiscal year 2005.
Mr. Klauer also owns the property at one of these stores
which is leased to the partnership under a lease providing for
annual rent of $228,000, subject to annual adjustments based on
the Consumer Price Index, and a term expiring in December 2010.
The partnership has the option to renew the lease, upon its
expiration, for a five-year period.
Certain shareholders of the Company own significant interests
in, or are related to owners of, the entities discussed below.
As such, these entities are considered related parties for
financial reporting purposes. All transactions with the
Schnitzer family (including Schnitzer family companies) require
the approval of the Companys Audit Committee, and the
Company is in compliance with this policy.
82
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Schnitzer Investment Corp. (SIC) is a real
estate company that owns, develops and manages various
commercial and residential real estate projects. It is owned by
members of the Schnitzer family, who are collectively
controlling shareholders of the Company through their ownership
of Class B common stock. The Company leased some of its
administrative offices from SIC under an operating lease that
expires in 2015, and at August 31, 2007 the annual rent was
less than $1 million annually. In the first quarter of
fiscal 2008, SIC sold this building to an unrelated party.
The following table summarizes the future minimum rents for
these related party leases (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Years ending
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
973
|
|
2009
|
|
|
986
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
717
|
|
2012
|
|
|
583
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company, SIC and another Schnitzer family company are also
parties to a shared services agreement for the performance of
various administrative services. During fiscal 2006,
substantially all services performed by the Company under this
agreement were eliminated. Under the shared services agreement,
the Company billed SIC a total of $57,000 and $156,000 in fiscal
2007 and 2006, respectively. Included in accounts receivable are
amounts due from SIC of $39,000 and $21,000 as of
August 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company also
repays SIC for various reimbursable expenses. For the years
ended August 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid SIC a
total of $200,000 and $173,000, respectively, for reimbursable
expenses. These administrative charges totaled less than
$1 million per year during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005.
During fiscal 2007, the Company engaged in a series of
transactions with EC Company (EC), an electrical
contractor, in which EC provided goods or services to the
Companys Portland-based operations. Total charges by EC to
the Company in fiscal 2007 were $146,000. Robert Ball, a
director of the Company, is the Chairman of the Board and a 27%
shareholder of BSR Holding Company, of which EC is a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
|
|
Note 17 -
|
Segment
Information
|
The Company operates in three reportable segments: metal
purchasing, processing, recycling, selling and trading (MRB),
mini-mill steel manufacturing (SMB) and self-service and
full-service used auto parts (APB). Additionally, the Company is
a non-controlling partner in joint ventures, which are either in
the metals recycling business or are suppliers of unprocessed
metal. As a result of the HNC separation that was completed on
September 30, 2005 (See Note 7 Business
Combinations), the Joint Venture segment was eliminated and the
results for the two entities acquired in this transaction that
the Company is now managing, as well as the remaining five joint
venture interests, are consolidated into MRB. As such, the joint
venture amounts for fiscal 2007 and 2006 are not presented
separately. The Company determined that retroactively adjusting
prior period results for the entities acquired in this
transaction is not meaningful given that the Company was a 50%
equity partner and was not involved in managing the day-to-day
operations of these entities prior to the HNC separation.
MRB buys and processes ferrous and nonferrous metal for sale to
foreign and other domestic steel producers or their
representatives and to SMB. MRB also purchases ferrous metal
from other processors for shipment directly to SMB.
SMB produces rebar, coiled rebar, merchant bar, wire rod, and
other specialty products.
83
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APB purchases used vehicles, sells parts from those vehicles
through its retail facilities and wholesale operations, and
sells the remaining portion of the vehicles to metal recyclers,
including MRB.
Intersegment sales from MRB to SMB and from APB to MRB are
negotiated rates intended to approximate market prices. These
intercompany sales tend to produce intercompany profits which
are not recognized, until the finished products are ultimately
sold to third parties.
The information provided below is obtained from internal
information that is provided to the Companys chief
operating decision-maker for the purpose of corporate
management. The Company does not allocate corporate interest
income and expense, income taxes or other income and expenses
related to corporate activity to its operating segments. Because
of this unallocated expense, the operating income of each
segment does not reflect the operating income the segment would
have as a stand-alone business.
84
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The tables below illustrate the Companys operating results
by segment for the years ended August 3, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
2,089,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,783
|
|
|
$
|
580,147
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
266,354
|
|
|
|
218,130
|
|
|
|
107,808
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
424,550
|
|
|
|
386,610
|
|
|
|
315,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenue
|
|
|
2,780,175
|
|
|
|
2,011,523
|
|
|
|
1,003,431
|
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(207,910)
|
|
|
|
(156,808)
|
|
|
|
(150,353)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,572,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,854,715
|
|
|
$
|
853,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
21,990
|
|
|
$
|
15,893
|
|
|
$
|
7,141
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
7,818
|
|
|
|
6,727
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
8,987
|
|
|
|
8,224
|
|
|
|
8,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
38,795
|
|
|
|
30,844
|
|
|
|
20,262
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
40,563
|
|
|
$
|
31,411
|
|
|
$
|
20,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
165,599
|
|
|
$
|
127,689
|
|
|
$
|
111,703
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
29,050
|
|
|
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
28,080
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
64,355
|
|
|
|
74,791
|
|
|
|
42,661
|
|
Joint
Ventures(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
69,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
259,004
|
|
|
|
230,814
|
|
|
|
252,074
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(45,441)
|
|
|
|
(55,750)
|
|
|
|
(21,003)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income
|
|
$
|
213,563
|
|
|
$
|
175,064
|
|
|
$
|
231,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes, minority interests and
pre-acquisition interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
167,543
|
|
|
$
|
129,216
|
|
|
$
|
181,192
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
30,584
|
|
|
|
29,712
|
|
|
|
29,207
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
63,996
|
|
|
|
74,444
|
|
|
|
42,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before income taxes, minority interests and
pre-acquisition interests
|
|
|
262,123
|
|
|
|
233,372
|
|
|
|
252,835
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(53,158)
|
|
|
|
(1,683)
|
|
|
|
(21,949)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before taxes, minority interests and
pre-acquisition interests
|
|
$
|
208,965
|
|
|
$
|
231,689
|
|
|
$
|
230,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
41,390
|
|
|
$
|
53,777
|
|
|
$
|
33,303
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
12,553
|
|
|
|
5,143
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
30,376
|
|
|
|
9,710
|
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment capital expenditures
|
|
|
78,819
|
|
|
|
76,040
|
|
|
|
47,798
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
2,034
|
|
|
|
10,543
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
80,853
|
|
|
$
|
86,583
|
|
|
$
|
48,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a result of the HNC joint venture separation and termination
agreement, the Joint Venture segment was eliminated and the
results for the two entities acquired in this transaction, in
which the Company had a previous interest, and all remaining
Joint Ventures, were consolidated into MRB as of the beginning
of fiscal 2006. Included in the Joint Venture segment for fiscal
2005 is estimated operating income for these two businesses of
$12 million for the year then ended. The Company determined
that retroactively adjusting prior period results for entities
acquired in this transaction is not meaningful given that the
Company was a 50% partner and was not involved in managing
day-to-day operations of these entities prior to the HNC
separation. |
Revenues by geographic area for the year ended August 31,
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
North America
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales to Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Parts Business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Sales to Metals Recycling Business
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers in North America
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,572
|
|
|
$
|
1,855
|
|
|
$
|
853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2007 and 2006, there were no external customers that
accounted for more than 10% of the Companys consolidated
revenues, and in fiscal year 2005, MRB had one customer that
accounted for $108 million, or 13%, of the Companys
consolidated revenues. Sales to foreign countries are a
significant part of the Companys business. The schedule
below identifies those foreign countries in which the
Companys sales exceeded 10% of consolidated revenues, in
any of the last three years ended August 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
South Korea
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Turkey
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
86
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following is a summary of the Companys total assets
for the year ended August 31, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Metals Recycling Business
|
|
$
|
905,666
|
|
|
$
|
728,985
|
|
Auto Parts Business
|
|
|
239,280
|
|
|
|
146,502
|
|
Steel Manufacturing Business
|
|
|
308,846
|
|
|
|
243,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
1,453,792
|
|
|
|
1,119,139
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(302,378
|
)
|
|
|
(74,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,151,414
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets consist primarily of net property, plant and
equipment. Substantially all of the Companys long-lived
assets are located in the U.S.
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
In the opinion of management, this unaudited quarterly financial
summary includes all adjustments necessary to present fairly the
results for the periods represented (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
509,854
|
|
|
$
|
604,442
|
|
|
$
|
709,449
|
|
|
$
|
748,520
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
33,576
|
|
|
$
|
47,264
|
|
|
$
|
69,770
|
|
|
$
|
62,953
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
21,158
|
|
|
$
|
28,446
|
|
|
$
|
43,754
|
|
|
$
|
37,976
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
341,231
|
|
|
$
|
403,285
|
|
|
$
|
505,573
|
|
|
$
|
604,626
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
17,533
|
|
|
$
|
31,570
|
|
|
$
|
49,310
|
|
|
$
|
76,651
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
41,530
|
|
|
$
|
21,118
|
|
|
$
|
30,205
|
|
|
$
|
50,215
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
1.62
|
|
87
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For the Years Ended August 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A
|
|
Column B
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Column D
|
|
|
Column E
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
beginning
|
|
|
cost and
|
|
|
|
|
|
end of
|
|
Description
|
|
of period
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
period
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
1,271
|
|
|
$
|
1,342
|
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
1,821
|
|
Inventories net realizable value
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
1,271
|
|
Inventories net realizable value
|
|
$
|
3,535
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
|
$
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
Inventories net realizable value
|
|
$
|
3,392
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,535
|
|
88
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES
FORM 10-K
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
completed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of August 31, 2007, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting is presented within Item 8 of this
Annual Report.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting during its most recent fiscal year that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Certifications
The certifications of the Companys Chief Executive Office
and Chief Financial Officer required under Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have been filed with as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
89
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES
FORM 10-K
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
Information required by Item 401, 405 and 407 of
Regulation S-K
regarding directors and beneficial ownership will be included
under Election of Directors, Corporate
Governance and under Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance, respectively in the
Companys Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Executive
Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Office
|
John D. Carter
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Gregory J. Witherspoon
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Richard D. Peach
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Vice President, Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer
|
Tamara L. Lundgren
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Gary A. Schnitzer
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
Donald W. Hamaker
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
President, Metals Recycling Business
|
Thomas D. Klauer, Jr.
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
President, Auto Parts Business
|
Jeffrey Dyck
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
President, Steel Manufacturing Business
|
Richard C. Josephson
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
John D. Carter joined the Company as President and Chief
Executive Officer in May 2005. From 2002 to May 2005,
Mr. Carter was engaged in a consulting practice focused
primarily on strategic planning in transportation and energy for
national and international businesses, as well as other small
business ventures. From 1982 to 2002, Mr. Carter served in
a variety of senior management capacities at Bechtel Group, Inc.
including Executive Vice President and Director, as well as
President of Bechtel Enterprises, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary, and other operating groups. His duties during his
tenure included providing senior executive oversight to almost
all of Bechtels business lines, operating groups and
service groups. Prior to his Bechtel tenure, Mr. Carter was
a partner in a San Francisco law firm. He is a director of
Northwest Natural Gas Company and FLIR Systems, Inc. and
Chairman of the Board of private company Kuni Automotive.
Gregory J. Witherspoon joined the Company in August 2005
as Interim Chief Financial Officer and was appointed as Chief
Financial Officer in January 2006. Mr. Witherspoon was a
managing director with the financial consulting firm, Plan Bravo
Partners, LLC from 1998 through 2006. Prior to this,
Mr. Witherspoon was Chief Financial Officer of Aames
Financial Corporation from 1997 to 1998, a publicly listed
financial services company. From 1998 to 2003,
Mr. Witherspoon served as a member of the Board of
Directors and Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of Approved Financial Corp., a Virginia-chartered
financial institution. Prior to this time, he was a CPA with two
of the major public accounting firms.
Richard D. Peach joined the Company in March 2007 as
Deputy Chief Financial Officer. He is also the Companys
Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Peach was the Chief Financial
Officer and Senior Vice President with the multi-state energy
utility, PacifiCorp, based in Portland, Oregon from 2003 to
2006. Previously, he served in a variety of executive positions
with Scottish Power, the international energy company
headquartered in Glasgow, Scotland, including Group Controller
from 2000 through 2002, Head of United Kingdom Customer Services
from 1999 to 2000 and Head of Energy Supply Finance from 1997 to
1999. Mr. Peach is a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of Scotland.
90
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES
FORM 10-K
Tamara L. Lundgren joined the Company in September 2005
as Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer. She became
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Investments in April,
2006 and was elected Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer in November, 2006. Prior to joining the
Company, Ms. Lundgren was an investment banker, most
recently as a Managing Director at JPMorgan Chase, which she
joined in 2001. From 1996 until 2001, Ms. Lundgren was a
Managing Director at Deutsche Bank AG in New York and London.
Prior to joining Deutsche Bank, Ms. Lundgren was a partner
at the law firm of Hogan & Hartson, LLP in
Washington, D.C.
Gary A. Schnitzer is an Executive Vice President and was
in charge of the Companys California Metals Recycling
operations from 1980 until 2007. He serves on the Companys
Executive Committee and assists in developing the strategic
direction of the Companys Metals Recycling Business.
Donald W. Hamaker joined the Company as President of the
Metals Recycling Business in September 2005. Mr. Hamaker
was employed in management positions by HNC for nearly
20 years, serving as President since 1999.
Thomas D. Klauer, Jr. has been the
President of the Auto Parts Business since the Companys
acquisition of
Pick-N-Pull
Auto Dismantling, Inc. in 2003. Prior thereto, Mr. Klauer
was employed by Pick-N-Pull, having joined that Company in 1989.
Jeffrey Dyck joined the Steel Manufacturing Business in
February 1994 and served in a variety of positions, including
Manager of the Rolling Mills and Director of Operations of the
Steel Manufacturing Business, prior to his promotion to
President in June 2005.
Richard C. Josephson joined the Company in January 2006
as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to
joining the Company, Mr. Josephson was a Member of the law
firm Stoel Rives LLP, where he had practiced law since 1973.
Code of
Ethics
On October 5, 2006, the Board of Directors approved
amendments to the Companys Code of Conduct that is
applicable to all of its directors and employees. It includes
additional provisions that apply to the Companys principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar
functions (the Senior Financial Officers). This
document is posted on the Companys internet website
(www.schnitzersteel.com), is available free of charge by calling
the Company or submitting a request to ir@schn.com and
was filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 12, 2006. The Company intends
to disclose on its website any amendments to or waivers of the
Code for directors, executive officers or Senior Financial
Officers.
Section 16
Compliance
The information required by this item will be included under
Section 16 Compliance in the Companys
Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by Items 402 and 407 of
Regulation S-K
regarding executive compensation is included under
Compensation of Executive Officers,
Compensation Discussion and Analysis and
Director Compensation in the Proxy Statement to be
filed for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is
incorporated herein by reference.
91
SCHNITZER
STEEL INDUSTRIES
FORM 10-K
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information with respect to security ownership of certain
beneficial owners and management, as required by
Item 201(d) and Item 403 of
Regulation S-K,
will be included under Voting Securities and Principal
Shareholders in the Companys Proxy Statement for its
2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein
by reference. Information with respect to securities authorized
for issuance under equity compensation plans will be included
under Compensation Plan Information in the
Companys Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required by this item will be included under
Certain Transactions in the Companys Proxy
Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information regarding the Companys principal accountant
fees and services will be included under Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Companys
Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
is incorporated herein by reference.
92
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
1.
|
|
The following financial statements are filed as part of this
report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule on
page 43 of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
The following schedule and report of independent accountants are
filed as part of this report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules are omitted as the information is either not
applicable or is not required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated December 30, 2004,
among Vehicle Recycling Solutions, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, several wholly-owned subsidiaries of Vehicle
Recycling Solutions, LLC, and Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, a
California general partnership and wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Registrant. Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Master Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2005, by and among
Hugo Neu Co., LLC, HNE Recycling LLC, HNW Recycling LLC, and
Joint Venture Operations, Inc. and for certain limited purposes
Hugo Neu Corporation and the Registrant. Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 9, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
Unit Purchase Agreement, dated August 5, 2005, between
Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, PNP Commercial Acquisition, LLC,
and Tree Acquisition, L.P., related to the acquisition of
GreenLeaf Auto Recyclers, LLC. Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 5, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated August 5, 2005,
between PNP Commercial Acquisition, LLC, and Ford Motor Company,
related to the acquisition of GreenLeaf Auto Recyclers, LLC.
Filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 5, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
First Amendment, dated September 30, 2005, to Unit Purchase
Agreement dated August 5, 2005 between Pick-N-Pull Auto
Dismantlers, PNP Commercial Acquisition, LLC, and Tree
Acquisition, L.P. Filed as Exhibit 2.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 5, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
.6
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2005,
between RRC Acquisition, LLC, Regional Recycling LLC, Metal
Asset Acquisition, LLC, 939 Fortress Investments, LLC, Fortress
Apartments, LLC, Integrity Metal, LLC, RCC Recycling, LLC, Alan
Dreher, George Dreher, Paul Dreher, James J. Filler, Teja Jouhal
and Herbert Miller. Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
2006 Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant. Filed
as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 9, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 8,
2005, between the Registrant, Bank of America, NA, and the Other
Lenders Party Thereto. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
July 20, 2007, between the Company, Bank of America, NA,
and Other Lenders Party Thereto. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 24, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated March 21, 2006, between the
Registrant and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Filed as Exhibit 4.1
to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
.1
|
|
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. 2001 Restated Voting Trust and
Buy-Sell Agreement, dated March 26, 2001. Filed as
Exhibit 9.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement (3200 Yeon), dated
August 7, 2003, between Schnitzer Investment Corp. and the
Registrant, relating to the corporate headquarters at 3200 NW
Yeon Ave. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement (3330 Yeon), dated
August 7, 2003, between Schnitzer Investment Corp. and the
Registrant, relating to the corporate headquarters at 3330 NW
Yeon Ave. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated September 1, 1988, between Schnitzer
Investment Corp. and the Registrant, as amended, relating to the
Portland Metals Recycling operation and which has terminated
except for surviving indemnity obligations. Filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
filed on September 24, 1996 (Commission File
No. 33-69352),
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement
(3200 Yeon), dated February 1, 2004. Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement
(3200 Yeon), dated October 20, 2005. Filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement
(3330 Yeon), dated February 1, 2004. Filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Amendment to Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement, (3330 Yeon),
dated October 20, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Yeon Business Center Lease Agreement
(3200 NW Yeon), dated March 10, 2006. Filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 4, 2005, between
Schnitzer Investment Corp. and the Registrant, relating to
purchase by the Registrant of the Portland Metals Recycling
operations real estate. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 10, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Second Amended Shared Services Agreement, dated
September 13, 1993, between the Registrant and certain
entities controlled by shareholders of the Registrant. Filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
filed on September 24, 1996 (Commission File
No. 33-69352),
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment, dated September 1, 1994, to Second Amended
Shared Services Agreement between the Registrant and certain
entities controlled by shareholders of the Registrant. Filed as
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1995, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Third Amended Shared Services Agreement, dated July 26,
2006, between the Registrant, Schnitzer Investment Corp. and
Island Equipment Company, Inc. Filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.13
|
|
Letter Agreement regarding initial compensation terms, dated
July 18, 2005, between John D. Carter and the Registrant.
Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on July 20, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.14
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated February 17, 2006, between John
D. Carter and the Registrant. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.15
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated February 17,
2006, between John D. Carter and the Registrant. Filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.16
|
|
Agreement, dated August 31, 2005, between Gregory J.
Witherspoon and the Registrant regarding
Mr. Witherspoons position as Interim Chief Financial
Officer. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on September 6, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.17
|
|
Letter agreement, dated January 6, 2006, between Gregory J.
Witherspoon and the Registrant, regarding
Mr. Witherspoons position as Chief Financial Officer.
Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.18
|
|
Letter agreement, dated January 6, 2006, between Richard C.
Josephson and the Registrant, regarding
Mr. Josephsons position as Vice President and General
Counsel. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.19
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated September 13, 2005, between
Donald Hamaker and the Registrant. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 19, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.20
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated April 10, 2006, between Tamara
L. Adler (Lundgren) and the Registrant. Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.21
|
|
Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated April 10,
2006, between Tamara L. Adler (Lundgren) and the Registrant.
Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.22
|
|
1993 Stock Incentive Plan of the Registrant. Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for quarter ended February 28, 2002, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.23
|
|
1993 Stock Incentive Plan of the Registrant as amended as of
January 30, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used for option grants to
employees under the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan. Filed as
Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.25
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement used for option grants to
non-employee directors under the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan.
Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.26
|
|
Form of Long-Term Incentive Award Agreement under the 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.28
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Bonus Plan of the Registrant.
Filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ended August 31, 2001, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.29
|
|
Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Bonus Plan of
the Registrant effective January 1, 2002. Filed as
Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ended August 31, 2001, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.30
|
|
Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated Economic
Value Added Bonus Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.31
|
|
Executive Annual Bonus Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.32
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Schedule, effective as of
September 1, 2005. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 20, 2005, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.33
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Schedule, effective as of
July 26, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on September 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.34
|
|
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement for non-employee
directors. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.35
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.36
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors and Executive
Officers. Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.37
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement. Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 8, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Deferred Prosecution Agreement (including Statement of Facts),
dated October 16, 2006, between the Registrant and the
United States Department of Justice. Filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Plea Agreement by SSI International Far East, Ltd., dated
October 10, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Criminal Information, United States of America vs. SSI
International Far East, Ltd., dated October 10, 2006. Filed
as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Offer of Settlement to the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, dated July 26, 2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.4
to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Order Instituting
Cease-and-Desist
Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing a
Cease-and-Desist
Order Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, dated October 16, 2006. Filed as
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 19, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.43
|
|
Form of Long-Term Incentive Award Agreement under the 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.44
|
|
Fiscal 2007 Annual Performance Bonus Program. Filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.45
|
|
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, effective September 1,
2006. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2007, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.46
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated March 2, 2007, between the
Registrant and Richard D. Peach, regarding Mr. Peachs
position as Deputy Chief Financial Officer. Filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 22, 2007, and incorporated herein, by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.47
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, as amended as of
August 9, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.48
|
|
Form of Long-Term Incentive Award Agreement under the 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended as of August 9, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.49
|
|
Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the 1993
Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*10
|
.50
|
|
Amendment to Equity Award Agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant.
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
|
98
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
SCHNITZER STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
Dated October 29, 2007
|
|
By: /s/ GREGORY
J. WITHERSPOON
Gregory
J. Witherspoon
Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant: October 29, 2007 in
the capacities indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
D. CARTER
John
D. Carter
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GREGORY
J. WITHERSPOON
Gregory
J. Witherspoon
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RICHARD
D. PEACH
Richard
D. Peach
|
|
Deputy Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
*ROBERT
S. BALL
Robert
S. Ball
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*WILLIAM
A. FURMAN
William
A. Furman
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*JUDITH
JOHANSEN
Judith
Johansen
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*WILLIAM
LARSSON
William
Larsson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*SCOTT
LEWIS
Scott
Lewis
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*KENNETH
M. NOVACK
Kenneth
M. Novack
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*MARK
L. PALMQUIST
Mark
L. Palmquist
|
|
Director
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*JEAN
S. REYNOLDS
Jean
S. Reynolds
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*JILL
SCHNITZER EDELSON
Jill
Schnitzer Edelson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*RALPH
R. SHAW
Ralph
R. Shaw
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ GREGORY
J. WITHERSPOON
Attorney-in-fact,
Gregory J. Witherspoon
|
|
|
100