e10vk
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
[X]
|
|
Annual report pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
or
|
[ ]
|
|
Transition Report Pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-03560
P. H. Glatfelter
Company
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-0628360
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 South George Street,
Suite 500
York, Pennsylvania 17401
|
|
(717) 225-4711
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes No
ü .
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes No
ü .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes ü No .
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy of
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes No ü .
Based on the closing price as of June 30, 2006, the
aggregate market value of Common Stock of the Registrant held by
non-affiliates was $517.3 million.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated
ü
Accelerated Non-Accelerated.
Common
Stock outstanding on March 8, 2007 totaled
45,472,226 shares.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the following documents are incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Proxy Statement to be dated on or about March 21, 2007
(Part III).
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended
DECEMBER 31,
2006
Table of
Contents
Overview Glatfelter began operations in 1864
and today we believe we are one of the worlds leading
manufacturers of specialty papers and engineered products.
Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania, we own and operate paper
mills located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, Chillicothe and
Fremont, Ohio, Gernsbach, Germany, Gloucestershire, the United
Kingdom and Scaër, France, as well as an abaca pulp mill in
the Philippines.
We serve customers in numerous markets, including book
publishing, carbonless and forms, envelope and converting,
engineered products, food and beverage, composite laminates and
other highly technical niche markets. Many of the markets in
which we operate are characterized by higher-value-added
products and, in some cases, by higher growth prospects and
lower cyclicality than commodity paper markets. Examples of some
of our key product offerings include papers for:
|
|
|
|
|
trade book publishing;
|
|
|
tea bags and coffee filters;
|
|
|
carbonless products;
|
|
|
specialized envelopes;
|
|
|
playing cards;
|
|
|
pressure-sensitive postage stamps;
|
|
|
metallized labels for beer bottles; and
|
|
|
digital imaging applications.
|
Recent Developments On March 13, 2006, we
completed our acquisition of certain assets of JR Crompton, a
global supplier of wet laid nonwoven products based in
Manchester, United Kingdom. Since February 7, 2006,
Crompton had been subject to insolvency proceedings before The
High Court of Justice Chancery Division, Manchester District.
Under the terms of our agreement with Crompton, we acquired
Cromptons Lydney mill, located in Gloucestershire, United
Kingdom, for approximately $65 million based on currency
exchange rates on that date. The facility employs approximately
240 people and had 2005 revenues of approximately
$75 million. The Lydney mill, which is now included in our
Composite Fibers business unit, produces a broad portfolio of
wet laid nonwoven products, including tea bags and coffee filter
papers, clean room wipes, lens tissue and dye filter paper,
double-sided adhesive tape substrates and battery grid pasting
tissue. The acquisition of the Lydney mill further strengthened
our leading position in tea bags and coffee filter papers and is
part of our long-term strategy to drive growth in our Composite
Fibers business unit.
On April 3, 2006, we completed our acquisition of the
carbonless business operations of NewPage Corporation, for
$83.3 million in cash. The acquired assets consist of a
400,000
ton-per-year
paper making facility in Chillicothe, Ohio and coating
operations based in Fremont, Ohio (collectively referred to as
Chillicothe). Chillicothe had revenue of $441.5 million in
2005 and approximately 1,700 employees as of December 31,
2006.
We executed the Chillicothe acquisition so that we could take
advantage of Chillicothes scale and efficient
manufacturing environment. As part of our integration plan for
Chillicothe, we transferred the production of products
manufactured at our former Neenah, WI facility to Chillicothe
and permanently shut down our Neenah facility on June 30,
2006.
On April 3, 2006, we entered into our new credit facility,
which provides for a $200 million revolving credit facility
and a $100 million term loan. Proceeds from our new credit
facility were used to repay in full all amounts outstanding
under our former revolving credit facility due June 2006, to
finance the Chillicothe acquisition and for general corporate
purposes.
In addition, on April 28, 2006 we completed a
$200 million bond offering, the proceeds of which were
primarily used to prepay our $150 million bonds.
Our Business Units We manage our business as
two distinct units: the Europe-based Composite Fibers business
unit and the North America-based Specialty Papers business unit.
The following table summarizes consolidated net sales and the
relative net sales contribution of each of our business units
for the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
$
|
543,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business unit
composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net tons sold by each business unit for the past three years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
653,734
|
|
|
|
|
450,900
|
|
|
|
421,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
68,148
|
|
|
|
|
47,669
|
|
|
|
48,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
721,892
|
|
|
|
|
498,593
|
|
|
|
470,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers Our North
America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses on papers
for the production of high-quality hardbound books and other
book publishing needs, carbonless papers designed for multiple
end-uses, such as credit card receipts, forms and other
applications, envelope & converting markets and highly
technical customized products for the digital
-2-
GLATFELTER
imaging, casting and release, pressure sensitive, and several
niche technical specialty markets.
Specialty Papers revenue composition by market consisted
of the following for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Book publishing
|
|
$
|
166,605
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,269
|
|
|
$
|
142,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbonless & Forms
|
|
|
266,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Envelope & converting
|
|
|
103,042
|
|
|
|
|
91,751
|
|
|
|
81,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered products
|
|
|
137,007
|
|
|
|
|
129,936
|
|
|
|
113,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20,359
|
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
693,660
|
|
|
|
$
|
380,923
|
|
|
$
|
337,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe we are the leading supplier of book publishing papers
in the United States and one of two carbonless paper market
leaders. Specialty Papers also produces paper that is converted
into specialized envelopes in a wide array of colors, finishes
and capabilities. These markets are generally more mature and,
therefore, have modest growth characteristics. The market for
carbonless papers is declining approximately 7% to 9% per
year.
Specialty Papers highly technical engineered products
include those designed for multiple end uses, such as papers for
pressure-sensitive postage stamps, greeting and playing cards,
digital imaging applications and for release paper applications.
Such products comprise an array of distinct business niches that
are in a continuous state of evolution. Many of these products
are utilized in demanding, specialized customer and end-user
applications. Some of our products are new and high growth while
others are more mature and further along on the development
curve. Because many of these products are technically complex
and involve substantial customer-supplier development
collaboration, they command higher per ton values and generally
exhibit greater pricing stability relative to commodity grade
paper products.
As of April 3, 2006, our Specialty Papers business unit
includes the Chillicothe operations.
Composite Fibers Composite Fibers,
based in Gernsbach, Germany, focuses on higher-value-added
products, such as paper for tea bags and coffee pods/pads and
filters, decorative laminates used for furniture and flooring,
and metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles.
Composite Fibers revenue composition by market consisted of the
following for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Food & Beverage
|
|
$
|
180,258
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,070
|
|
|
$
|
107,482
|
|
|
|
Composite Laminates
|
|
|
50,734
|
|
|
|
|
42,948
|
|
|
|
47,342
|
|
|
|
Metallized
|
|
|
40,078
|
|
|
|
|
35,541
|
|
|
|
33,286
|
|
|
|
Technical Specialties and Other
|
|
|
21,681
|
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
17,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
292,751
|
|
|
|
$
|
198,137
|
|
|
$
|
205,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our focus on products made from abaca pulp has made us one of
the worlds largest producers of tea bag papers. The
balance of this units sales are comprised of overlay and
technical specialty products, which include flooring and
furniture overlay papers, metallized products, and papers for
adhesive tapes, vacuum bags, holographic labels and gift wrap.
Many of this units papers are technically sophisticated.
We believe we are well positioned to produce these extremely
lightweight papers because we understand their complexities,
which require the use of highly specialized fiber and
specifically designed papermaking equipment.
As of March 13, 2006, our Composite Fibers business unit
includes the Lydney mill.
Additional financial information for each of our business units
is included in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and in Item 8 Financial Statements,
Note 20.
Our Competitive Strengths Since commencing
operations over 140 years ago, we believe that Glatfelter
has developed into one of the worlds leading manufacturers
of specialty papers and engineered products. We believe that the
following competitive strengths have contributed to our success:
Leading market positions in higher-value, niche
segments. We have focused our resources to
achieve market-leading positions in certain higher-value, niche
segments. Our products include various highly specialized paper
products designed for technically demanding end uses.
Consequently, many of our products achieve premium pricing
relative to that of commodity paper grades. In 2006,
approximately 82% of our sales were derived from these
higher-value, niche products. The specialized nature of these
products generally provides greater pricing stability relative
to commodity paper products.
Customer-centric business
focus. We offer a unique and diverse product line
that can be customized to serve the individual needs of our
customers. Our size allows us to develop close relationships
with our key customers and to be adaptable in our product
development, manufacturing, sales and marketing practices. We
believe that this approach has led to the development of
excellent customer relationships, defensible market positions,
and increased pricing stability relative to commodity paper
producers. Additionally, our customer-centric focus has been a
key driver to our success in new product development.
Significant investment in product
development. In order to keep up with our
customers ever-changing needs, we continually enhance our
product offerings through significant investment in product
development. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, we
-3-
GLATFELTER
invested approximately $8.0 million, $4.9 million and
$5.2 million, respectively, in product development
activities. We derive a significant portion of our revenue from
products developed, enhanced or improved as a result of these
activities. Revenue generated from products developed, enhanced
or improved within the five previous years as a result of these
activities represented approximately 52%, 52% and 60% of net
sales in the years ended 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Integrated production. As a
partially integrated producer, we are able to mitigate changes
in the costs of certain raw materials and energy. Our Spring
Grove and Chillicothe facilities are vertically integrated
operations producing in excess of 85% of the annual pulp
required for their paper production. The principal raw material
used to produce this pulp is pulpwood, consisting of both
hardwoods and softwoods. We own approximately 75,000 acres
of timberlands and, in 2006, obtained approximately 20% of our
pulpwood requirements for our Spring Grove facility from
Glatfelter-owned timberlands, which helps stabilize our fiber
costs in a highly fragmented market. Our Spring Grove and
Chillicothe facilities also generate 100% of the steam and
substantially all of the electricity required for their
operations. In addition, our Philippine mill processes abaca
fiber to produce abaca pulp, which is a key raw material used by
our Composite Fibers business unit.
Our Business Strategy Our vision is to become
the global supplier of choice in specialty papers and engineered
products. We are continuously developing and refining strategies
to strengthen our business and position it for the future.
Execution of these strategies is intended to capitalize on our
customer relationships, technology and people, as well as our
leadership positions in certain product lines. In recent years,
our industry has been challenged by a supply and demand
imbalance, particularly for commodity-like products. While the
industry has responded to take out under-performing capacity,
the imbalance continues. To be successful in the current market
environment, our strategy is focused on aggressively reducing
costs and continually repositioning our product portfolio to
increase our focus on higher-value, niche products and to better
align our product offerings with our customers
ever-changing needs. Certain key elements of our business
strategy are outlined below:
|
|
|
Reposition our product portfolio. By leveraging our
leadership positions in several specialty niche segments, we
plan to accelerate growth, improve margins and generate better
financial returns through the optimization of our product
portfolio. In 2006, approximately 82% of our total sales were
derived from what we consider to be higher-value, niche
products. Over time, we plan to increase our concentration on
such products by driving growth in our sales of trade book
papers, uncoated specialty products, composite fiber products
and other specialty products. The recently acquired Chillicothe
assets provide a significant scaleable production platform to
support this strategy. We believe that this strategy will
realign our business more closely with our customers needs
and further reduce our exposure to the higher level of
cyclicality experienced in commodity paper grades.
|
|
|
Execute Composite Fibers growth plan. A core
component of our long-term strategy is to drive growth in our
Composite Fibers business unit. Currently, we are the leading
producer of tea bag and coffee pod/pad papers in the world, and
with the Lydney mill acquisition we have further strengthened
our competitive position. We believe that this segment has
promising growth characteristics as certain geographies move
toward the use of tea bags as opposed to loose tea leaves. We
believe that we are well positioned to capitalize on this growth
by leveraging our strong customer relationships and leading
position in this segment.
|
|
|
Employ a low-cost approach to specialty product
manufacturing. While we are focused on higher-value, niche
products, we seek to employ a commodity-like, low-cost approach
to our manufacturing activities. In 2004, we initiated the North
American Restructuring Program that improved operating results
by, among other factors, improving workforce efficiencies and
implementing improved supply chain management processes. In the
fourth quarter of 2005, we began the implementation of the
European Optimization and Restructuring Program, or the EURO
Program, a comprehensive series of actions designed to improve
the performance of the Composite Fibers business unit. The
pre-tax financial benefits of the EURO Program approximated
$8 million in 2006. To further improve our production cost
profile, in connection with the 2006 Chillicothe acquisition, we
closed our Neenah facility and transferred its production to the
more efficient Chillicothe facility.
|
|
|
Maintain a strong balance sheet and preserve financial
flexibility. We are focused on prudent financial management
and the maintenance of a conservative capital structure. We are
committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet and preserving
our flexibility so that we may pursue strategic opportunities,
including strategic acquisitions, that will benefit our company.
|
-4-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
Timberland Strategy. We completed an extensive study to
determine the optimal approach for managing our timberlands in a
way that creates the greatest value for our company. The study
considered many factors including, among others, land
valuations, external and internal wood costs and future fiber
requirements. We concluded that the most advantageous approach
is to sell 60,000 acres of higher and better use, or HBU,
properties in an orderly fashion. In some cases, low-cost,
low-risk opportunities may exist to add value to some of these
acres through entitlements. It is estimated that once all 60,000
HBU acres are sold, earnings will be adversely impacted by
approximately $0.04 to $0.07 per share, but we believe that
the expected proceeds from these planned sales will outweigh
this increased cost. Currently, we intend to retain the pure
timberland properties to mitigate the cost of replacing
internally generated wood with outside sources. Execution of our
Timberland Strategy is expected to take approximately two to
four more years to complete and is estimated to provide pre-tax
cash proceeds totaling in excess of $150 million, assuming,
among other factors, acceptable market conditions and a
carefully executed plan of disposition.
|
Raw Material and Energy The following table
provides an overview of the estimated amount of principal raw
materials (PRM) to be used by each of our
manufacturing facilities on an annual basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
PRM
|
|
|
|
|
(short tons)
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty
Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring Grove
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulpwood
|
|
|
1,026,000
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulpwood
|
|
|
1,164,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite
Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gernsbach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
29,400
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Abaca pulp
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Synthetic fiber
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lydney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Abaca pulp
|
|
|
5,800
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Synthetic fiber
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaër
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood pulp
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Abaca pulp
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Synthetic fiber
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abaca fiber
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Spring Grove mill is a vertically integrated operation
producing approximately 85% of the annual pulp required for
paper production. The principal raw material used to produce
this pulp is pulpwood, of which both hardwoods and softwoods are
used. At December 31, 2006, we owned approximately
75,000 acres of timberlands. In addition to this source of
pulpwood, we are committed, under a Supply Agreement expiring in
2011, to buy at market prices a minimum annual amount of pine
pulpwood averaging 34,425 tons per annum over the eight-year
term of the agreement. The pulpwood purchased under this
agreement is to be harvested from land we sold in March 2003.
In addition to these sources, hardwoods are available within a
relatively short distance of our mills. Softwoods are obtained
primarily from Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. To protect our
sources of pulpwood, we actively promote conservation and forest
management among suppliers and woodland owners.
Our Spring Grove, Pennsylvania facility generates 100% of the
steam and electricity required for its operations. Principal
fuel sources used by this facility are coal, recycled pulping
chemicals, bark and wood waste, and oil. The facility consumes
approximately 300,000 tons of coal annually. A new three year
contract became effective January 1, 2007, which will
increase our annual cost of coal by approximately
$6 million.
The Spring Grove facility produces more electricity than it
requires. Excess electricity is sold to the local power company
under a fixed-price long-term co-generation contract expiring in
2010. Energy sales, net of costs, were $10.7 million in
2006, $10.1 million in 2005 and $10.0 million in 2004.
The continuation of this revenue stream at these levels is
dependent on our ability to negotiate a contract for periods
beyond 2010. As discussed elsewhere in this report, we entered
into a new three-year coal supply agreement beginning in January
2007. The increased cost of coal under this contract will
adversely effect net revenue from energy sales.
Our Chillicothe mill is also a vertically integrated operation
producing approximately 92% of its annual pulp requirements for
paper production in 2006. The principal raw material used to
produce this pulp is pulpwood, of which both hardwoods and
softwoods are used. Pulpwood is sourced externally at market
prices. Both hardwoods and softwoods are sourced primarily from
Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky.
Our Chillicothe facility generates 100% of the steam and 85% of
the electricity required for its operations. Principal fuel
sources used by the Chillicothe facility are natural gas, coal,
waste wood and black liquor, which is a byproduct of the pulp
making process. The facility consumes approximately
900,000 MMBTUs of natural gas, 315,000 tons of coal and
300,000 tons of wastewood annually. Two new coal
-5-
GLATFELTER
supply agreements were executed in the fourth quarter of 2006
and expire in December 2007 and November 2008.
The Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney facilities generate all of
the steam required for their operations. The Gernsbach facility
generated approximately 26% of its 2006 electricity needs and
purchased the balance. The Scaër and Lydney facilities
purchased all of their 2006 electric power requirements. Natural
gas was used to produce substantially all internally generated
energy at the Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney facilities during
2006.
Our Philippines mill processes abaca fiber to produce a
specialized pulp. This abaca pulp production provides a unique
advantage by supplying a key raw material used by our Composite
Fibers business unit. Events may arise from the relatively
unstable political and economic environment in which the
Philippine facility operates that could interrupt the production
of abaca pulp. Management periodically evaluates the
availability of abaca pulp for our Composite Fibers business
unit. Any extended interruption of the Philippine operation
could have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position
and/or
results of operations. We have approximately three months of
abaca pulp supply available to us. In addition, we have
established contingency plans for alternative sources of abaca
pulp. However, the cost of obtaining abaca pulp from such
alternative sources, if available, would likely be higher.
Based on information currently available, we believe that we
will continue to have ready access, for the foreseeable future,
to all principal raw materials used in the production of our
products. The cost of our raw material is subject to change,
including, but not limited to, costs of wood and pulp products
and energy.
New Product Development In order to keep up
with our customers ever-changing needs, we are continually
enhancing our product offerings through significant investment
in product development activities, including product
customizations developed in partnership or close collaboration
with our customers. We invested approximately $8.0 million,
$4.9 million and $5.2 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, on product development. Revenue generated from
products developed, enhanced or improved within the five
previous years as a result of these activities represented
approximately 52%, 52% and 60% of net sales in the years ended
2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In determining revenue
attributable to product development activities, we utilize an
independently developed framework, which we believe to be
generally accepted in the field of new product management. This
framework categorizes products developed, enhanced or improved
as those that (i) are new to the world, (ii) represent
a product line new to our Company, (iii) are a new product
within an existing product line, (iv) are a significant
improvement of an existing product, (v) are repositioned
into a new application or market, or (vi) are a lower cost
alternative to an existing product of the Company and seen by
our customers as a new offering. Approximately 42% of our
revenue attributable to developed, enhanced or improved products
come from products that fit within category (ii) and (iii),
above.
Concentration of Customers In 2006, 2005 and
2004, no single customer represented more than 10% of our
consolidated net sales.
Competition Our industry is highly
competitive. We compete on the basis of the quality of our
products, customer service, product development activities,
price and distribution. We offer our products throughout the
United States and globally in approximately 80 countries.
Competition in the markets in which we participate comes from
companies of various sizes, some of which have greater financial
and other resources than we do.
There are a number of companies in the United States that
manufacture printing and converting papers. We believe we are
the recognized leader in book publishing papers and compete in
these markets with, among others, Domtar and Fraser. In the
envelope sector we compete with, among others, International
Paper, Domtar and Blue Ridge. In the carbonless paper and forms
market, we compete with Appleton Papers. In our Specialty Papers
engineered products markets and for the Composite Fibers
business units markets, competition is product line
specific as the necessity for technical expertise and
specialized manufacturing equipment limits the number of
companies offering multiple product lines. We compete with
specialty divisions of large companies such as, among others,
Ahlstrom, International Paper, MeadWestvaco, Sappi and Stora
Enso. Service, product performance, technological advances and
product pricing are important competitive factors with respect
to all our products. We believe our reputation in these areas
continues to be excellent.
Despite the production capacity that has been removed, capacity
in the worldwide uncoated free-sheet industry continues to
exceed demand in recent years.
Environmental Matters We are subject to loss
contingencies resulting from regulation by various federal,
state, local and foreign governmental authorities with respect
to the environmental impact of our mills. To comply with
environmental laws and
-6-
GLATFELTER
regulations, we have incurred substantial capital and operating
expenditures in past years. For a discussion of environmental
matters, see Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data Note 19.
Employees The following table summarizes our
workforce as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Union
|
|
Union
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/Spring Grove
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe/Fremont
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gernsbach, Germany
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
Scaër, France
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
Gloucestershire, UK (Lydney)
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
Different locals of the United Steelworkers of America (USW),
represent the hourly employees at our U.S. facilities.
A five-year labor agreement in Spring Grove will end in January
2008. Negotiations for a new contract will begin in the first
half of 2007. The negotiation approach is expected to take the
same collaborative approach as the last negotiation held in
Spring Grove during 2002 due to the continued positive
relationship with the employees.
The labor contract with the USW local unions representing the
hourly employees at the newly acquired facility in Chillicothe
Ohio expired on August 1, 2006. On November 10, 2006,
a new 3-year
contract was ratified across the multiple local unions.
Various unions represent employees at our European facilities.
New labor agreements covering employees at the Gernsbach,
Germany and Scaër, France facilities were entered into
effective May 1, 2005 that provided for wage increase
averaging 1.5% over a 22 month period ending March 2007.
Employees at our Lydney mill participate in a national trade
agreement pursuant to which we negotiate separate union
agreements. Such agreements generally cover a one year period
from February 1 to January 31. We expect to begin
union negotiations in late March 2007.
Employees at our pulpmill in the Philippines are covered by a
five-year labor agreement, which was negotiated at the end of
2002.
We consider the overall relationship with our employees to be
satisfactory.
Available Information Our investor relations
website address is www.glatfelter.com/e/invesstock.asp. We make
available on our site free of charge our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and other related information as soon as reasonably practical
after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, our website includes a Corporate
Governance page consisting of, among others, our Governance
Principles and Code of Business Conduct, Board of Directors and
Executive Officers, Nominating, Audit and Compensation
Committees of the Board of Directors and their respective
Charters, Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior
Financial Officers of Glatfelter, our whistle-blower
policy and other related material. We intend to satisfy the
disclosure requirement for any future amendments to, or waivers
from, our Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics
for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers by posting such
information on our website. We will provide a copy of the Code
of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and
Senior Financial Officers, without charge, to any person who
requests one, by calling
(717) 225-2724.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
Risks
Related to Our Business
|
|
|
Our
business and financial performance may be adversely affected by
downturns in the target markets that we serve.
|
Demand for our products in the markets we serve is primarily
driven by consumption of the products we produce, which is most
often affected by general economic conditions. In recent years,
the global paper industry in which we compete has been adversely
impacted by paper producing capacity exceeding the demand for
products. Downturns in our target markets could result in
decreased demand for our products. In particular, our business
may be adversely affected during periods of economic weakness by
the general softness in these target markets. Our results could
be adversely affected if economic conditions weaken or fail to
improve. Also, there may be periods during which demand for our
products is insufficient to enable us to operate our production
facilities in an economical manner. These conditions are beyond
our ability to control and have had, and may continue to have, a
significant impact on our sales and results of operations.
In addition to fluctuations in demand for our products in the
markets we serve, the markets for our paper products are also
significantly affected by changes in industry capacity and
output levels. There have been periods of supply/demand
imbalance in the pulp and paper industry, which have caused pulp
and paper prices to be volatile. The timing and magnitude of
price increases or decreases in the pulp and paper market
-7-
GLATFELTER
have generally varied by region and by product type. A sustained
period of weak demand or excess supply would likely adversely
affect pulp and paper prices. This could have a material adverse
affect on our operating and financial results.
|
|
|
Our
industry is highly competitive and increased competition could
reduce our sales and profitability.
|
In recent years, the global paper industry in which we compete
has been adversely affected by paper producing capacity
exceeding the demand for products. As a result, the industry has
taken steps to reduce underperforming capacity. However, slowing
demand or increased competition could force us to lower our
prices or to offer additional services at a higher cost to us,
which could reduce our gross margins and net income. The greater
financial resources of certain of our competitors may enable
them to commit larger amounts of capital in response to changing
market conditions. Certain competitors may also have the ability
to develop product or service innovations that could put us at a
disadvantage.
Some of the factors that may adversely affect our ability to
compete in the markets in which we participate include:
|
|
|
|
|
the entry of new competitors into the markets we serve,
including foreign producers;
|
|
|
|
the willingness of commodity-based paper producers to enter our
specialty markets when they are unable to compete or when demand
softens in their traditional markets;
|
|
|
|
the aggressiveness of our competitors pricing strategies,
which could force us to decrease prices in order to maintain
market share;
|
|
|
|
our failure to anticipate and respond to changing customer
preferences;
|
|
|
|
our inability to develop new, improved or enhanced
products; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to maintain the cost efficiency of our facilities.
|
If we cannot effectively compete in the markets in which we
operate, our sales and operating results would be adversely
affected.
The
cost of raw materials and energy used to manufacture our
products could increase.
We require access to sufficient and reasonably priced quantities
of pulpwood, wood and other pulps, pulp substitutes, abaca fiber
and certain other raw materials. Our Spring Grove facility is a
vertically integrated manufacturing facility that generates
approximately 85% of its annual pulp requirements. In addition,
approximately 20% of its annual pulpwood requirements in 2006
were satisfied from company-owned timberlands. However, while
our Chillicothe facility makes its own pulp, it purchases wood
for use in its pulp mill. Our Philippine mill purchases abaca
fiber to make pulp, which we use to manufacture our composite
fiber products at our Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney
facilities.
Coal is a principal source of fuel for our Spring Grove
facility. Beginning in 2007 a new three-year coal supply
contract will increase our annual cost of coal by approximately
$6 million.
Natural gas is the principal source of fuel for our Chillicothe
and Composite Fibers business unit facilities. Natural gas
prices have increased significantly in the United States since
2000 and reached record highs in 2006. Prices for natural gas
are expected to remain volatile for the foreseeable future.
We may not be able to pass increased raw materials or energy
prices on to our customers if the market will not bear the
higher price or where existing agreements with our customers do
not allow us to pass along these cost increases. If price
adjustments significantly trail increases in raw materials or
energy prices our operating results could be adversely affected.
We
are subject to substantial costs and potential liability for
environmental matters.
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations
that govern our operations, including discharges into the
environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous
substances and wastes. We are also subject to laws and
regulations that impose liability and
clean-up
responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the
environment. To comply with environmental laws and regulations,
we have incurred, and will continue to incur, substantial
capital and operating expenditures. We anticipate that
environmental regulation of our operations will continue to
become more burdensome and that capital and operating
expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations
will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. Because
environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our
ability to compete in the world marketplace may be adversely
affected by capital and operating expenditures required for
environmental compliance. In addition, we may incur obligations
to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment,
such as air and water quality, resulting from mills we operate
or have operated. Potential
-8-
GLATFELTER
obligations include compensation for the restoration of natural
resources, personal injury and property damages.
In connection with the sale of our Ecusta Division in 2001, we
are incurring landfill closure costs and may incur additional
costs for recognized environmental concerns at the site of our
former mill related to the presence of mercury and certain other
contamination on and around the site; potentially hazardous
conditions existing in the sediment and water column of the
sites water treatment and aeration and sedimentation basin
(the ASB); and contamination associated with two
additional landfills on the site that were not used by us.
We are also liable for the costs of
clean-up
related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs,
in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah, Wisconsin
mill was located. We have financial reserves for environmental
matters but we cannot be certain that those reserves will be
adequate to provide for future obligations related to these
matters, that our share of costs
and/or
damages for these matters will not exceed our available
resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term,
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
Our environmental issues are complicated and should be reviewed
in context; please see a more detailed discussion of these
matters in Item 8 Financial Statements,
Note 19.
We
may not achieve our anticipated synergies from our Chillicothe
and Lydney acquisitions.
In 2006, we acquired Chillicothe and the Lydney mill. Inherent
risks in business combinations such as these include the
inability to successfully integrate the acquired production
facility and its procurement, marketing and sales requirements,
as well as information systems, finance and administration
functions. With respect to Chillicothe, although in 2006 we have
made progress transitioning book products, we cannot assure you
that we will be able to successfully produce the products in a
cost effective manner necessary to provide higher levels of
return.
With respect to the Lydney mill, in December 2006, we received
unconditional regulatory clearance for this acquisition and are
in the process of implementing integration plans. However, we
cannot assure you that these integration plans will be completed
timely or that the full financial benefits of the acquisition
will be realized.
Our inability to successfully execute the plans discussed above
may adversely affect our relationships with customers, suppliers
and employees. Accordingly, our financial results may be
adversely affected.
We
have operations in a politically and economically unstable
location.
We own and operate a pulp mill in the Philippines where the
operating environment is unstable and subject to political
unrest. Our Philippine pulp mill produces abaca pulp, a
significant raw material used by our Composite Fibers business
unit. Our Philippine pulp mill is currently the main provider of
abaca pulp. There are limited suitable alternative sources of
readily available abaca pulp in the world. In the event of a
disruption in supply from our Philippine mill, there is no
guarantee that we could obtain adequate amounts of abaca pulp
from alternative sources at a reasonable price or at all. As a
consequence, any civil disturbance, unrest, political
instability or other event that causes a disruption in supply
could limit the availability of abaca pulp and would increase
our cost of obtaining abaca pulp. Such occurrences could
adversely impact our sales volumes, revenues and operating
results.
We
may not be able to develop new products acceptable to our
customers.
Our business strategy is market focused and includes investments
in developing new products to meet the changing needs of our
customers and to maintain our market share. Our success will
depend in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new
and enhanced products that keep pace with introductions by our
competitors and changing customer preferences. If we fail to
anticipate or respond adequately to these factors, then we may
lose opportunities for business with both current and potential
customers. The success of our new product offerings will depend
on several factors, including our ability to,
|
|
|
|
|
anticipate and properly identify our customers needs and
industry trends;
|
|
|
price our products competitively;
|
|
|
develop and commercialize new products and applications in a
timely manner;
|
|
|
differentiate our products from our competitors
products; and
|
|
|
invest in research and development activities efficiently.
|
Our inability to develop new products could adversely impact our
business and ultimately harm our profitability.
-9-
GLATFELTER
Our
international operations pose certain risks that may adversely
impact sales and earnings.
We have significant operations and assets located in Germany,
France, the United Kingdom, and the Philippines. Our
international sales and operations are subject to a number of
special risks, in addition to the risks of our domestic sales
and operations, including differing protections of intellectual
property, trade barriers, labor unrest, exchange controls,
regional economic uncertainty, differing (and possibly more
stringent) labor regulation, risk of governmental expropriation,
domestic and foreign customs and tariffs, differing regulatory
environments, difficulty in managing widespread operations and
political instability and unrest. These factors may adversely
affect our future profits. Also, in some foreign jurisdictions
we may be subject to laws limiting the right and ability of
entities organized or operating therein to pay dividends or
remit earnings to affiliated companies unless specified
conditions are met. Any such limitations would restrict our
flexibility in using funds generated in those jurisdictions.
Foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our
results of operations.
We own and operate paper and pulp mills in Germany, France, the
United Kingdom and the Philippines. The local currency in
Germany and France is the Euro, in the UK the British Pound
Sterling, and in the Philippines the currency is the Peso.
During 2006, Euro functional currency operations generated
approximately 21% of our sales and 19.8% of operating expenses
and British Pound Sterling operations represented 6.1% of net
sales and 6.4% of operating expenses. The translation of the
results from these international operations into
U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
Our ability to maintain our products price competitiveness
for our international operations is reliant, in part, on the
relative strength of the currency in which the product is
denominated compared to the currency of the market into which it
is sold and the functional currency of our competitors. Changes
in the rate of exchange of foreign currencies in relation to the
U.S. dollar and other currencies may adversely impact our
ability to offer products in certain markets at acceptable
prices or our results of operations.
We
may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to simultaneously
fund our operations, finance capital expenditures, satisfy
obligations and make dividend payments on our common
stock.
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant
expenditures for equipment maintenance and new or enhanced
equipment, for environmental compliance matters and to support
our business strategies and research and development efforts. We
expect to meet all of our near- and longer-term cash needs from
a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents,
sale of timberlands, our existing credit facility or other bank
lines of credit and other long-term debt. If we are unable to
generate sufficient cash flow from these sources, we could be
unable to meet our near and longer-term cash needs or make
dividend payments.
We may
be unable to achieve expected proceeds from a sale of our
timberlands.
One of our primary business strategies is to sell
60,000 acres of higher and better use, or HBU, properties
over a two to four year period. Our ability to sell these
timberlands for the expected price depends on market conditions,
including the availability of similar properties for sale that
would compete with our properties. As a result, we may be unable
to generate the pre-tax proceeds of more than $150 million
we expect from the sale of these timberlands. It is estimated
that our pre-tax cost of fiber will increase when all HBU acres
are sold. These costs could be higher than estimated which could
adversely affect our financial results.
Our
indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and
prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the
notes.
We have now and will continue to have, a significant amount of
indebtedness. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$64.8 million of indebtedness outstanding under our
revolving credit facility, $96.0 million of indebtedness
outstanding under our term loan facility, $200 million of
indebtedness outstanding under our
71/8%
fixed rate bonds and $34.0 million of indebtedness
outstanding under our note payable to SunTrust. Our indebtedness
could materially and adversely affect us in a number of ways.
For example, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to the notes;
|
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry
conditions;
|
-10-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have
less debt; and
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds, including for
future acquisitions, to meet our operating expenses and for
other purposes.
|
In addition, a substantial portion of our debt, including
borrowings under our new credit facility, bears interest at
variable rates. If market interest rates increase, variable-rate
debt will create higher debt service requirements, which could
adversely affect our cash flow. While we may enter into
agreements limiting our exposure to higher interest rates, any
such agreements may not offer complete protection from this risk.
Our leased corporate offices are located in York, Pennsylvania.
We own and operate paper mills located in Spring Grove,
Pennsylvania; Chillicothe, Ohio; the United Kingdom; Gernsbach,
Germany; and Scaër, France. In addition, we own and operate
a pulp mill in the Philippines. Substantially all of the
equipment used in our papermaking and related operations, with
the exception of some leased vehicles, is also owned. All of our
properties, other than those that are leased, are free from any
material liens or encumbrances. We consider all of our buildings
to be in good structural condition and well maintained and our
properties to be suitable and adequate for present operations.
The following table summarizes the estimated production capacity
of each of our facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Annual Production
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity (short tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring Grove
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
Uncoated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
Coated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
Uncoated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
Coated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gernsbach
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
Lightweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
Metallized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaër
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
|
|
Lightweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lydney
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
Lightweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
12,240
|
|
|
|
Abaca pulp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Spring Grove facility includes five uncoated paper machines
that have been rebuilt and modernized from time to time. It has
an off-line combi-blade coater and a Specialty Coater
(S-Coater), which together yield a potential annual
production capacity for coated paper of approximately 66,000
tons. Since uncoated paper is used in producing coated paper,
this is not additional capacity. We view the S-Coater as an
important asset that allows us to expand our more profitable
engineered paper products business.
The Spring Grove facility also includes a pulpmill that has a
production capacity of approximately 650 tons of bleached pulp
per day. We have a precipitated calcium carbonate
(PCC) plant at our Spring Grove facility that
produces PCC at a lower cost than could be purchased from others
and lowers the need for higher-priced raw material typically
used for increasing the opacity and brightness of certain papers.
The Chillicothe facility operates four paper machines which
together yield a potential annual production capacity of
uncoated and carbonless paper of approximately 400,000 tons. In
addition, this location has produces 7,500 tons per year of
other coated paper. This facility also includes a pulpmill that
has a production capacity of approximately 955 tons of bleached
pulp per day.
Our Philippines facility consists of a pulpmill that supplies a
majority of the abaca pulp requirements of the Composite Fibers
paper mills.
The Gernsbach facility includes five uncoated paper machines
with an aggregate annual lightweight capacity of about 38,000
tons. In 2003, we rebuilt a paper machine with new
state-of-the-art
inclined wire technology. We believe this machine provides us
greater flexibility and technological capabilities. The
Gernsbach facility also has the capacity to produce 11,400 tons
of metallized papers annually, using a lacquering machine and
two metallizers. We purchase the base paper used to manufacture
the metallized paper.
The Scaër facility operates two paper machines with an
annual lightweight capacity of 6,100 tons and the Lydney
facility operates three paper machines with an annual
lightweight capacity of 15,700 tons.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in various lawsuits that we consider to be
ordinary and incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of
these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we
do not expect such lawsuits individually or in the aggregate,
will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
For a discussion of commitments, legal proceedings and related
contingencies, see Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data Note 19.
-11-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|
Not Applicable no matters were submitted to a vote
of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our executive officers as of March 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Office with the Company
|
|
|
George H. Glatfelter II
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Dante C. Parrini
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer
|
John P. Jacunski
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
Timothy R. Hess
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President and General Manager,
Specialty Papers Business Unit
|
Jeffrey J. Norton
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
|
Martin Rapp
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President and General Manager,
Composite Fibers Business Unit
|
Mark A. Sullivan
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Vice President Global Supply Chain
|
William T. Yanavitch II
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Vice President Human Resources and
Administration
|
David C. Elder
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
|
|
|
Officers are elected to serve at the pleasure of the Board of
Directors. Except in the case of officers elected to fill a new
position or a vacancy occurring at some other date, officers are
generally elected at the organizational meeting of the Board of
Directors held immediately after the annual meeting of
shareholders.
George H. Glatfelter II is our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. From April 2000 to February 2001,
Mr. Glatfelter was Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer. From June 1998 to April 2000, he was Chief Executive
Officer and President.
Mr. Glatfelter serves as a director of Met-Pro Corporation.
Dante C. Parrini became Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer in February 2005. Prior to this,
Mr. Parrini was Senior Vice President and General Manager,
a position he held since January 2003. From December 2000 until
January 2003, Mr. Parrini was Vice President
Sales and Marketing. From July 2000 to December 2000, he was
Vice President Sales and Marketing, Glatfelter
Division and Corporate Strategic Marketing.
John P. Jacunski became Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer in July 2006. From October 2003 until
July 2006, he was Vice President and Corporate Controller.
Mr. Jacunski was previously Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer at WCI Steel, Inc. from June 1999 to October
2003. From May 1995 to June 1999 he was WCIs Corporate
Controller. Prior to joining WCI, Mr. Jacunski was with
KPMG, an international accounting and consulting firm, where he
served in various capacities.
Timothy R. Hess has been Vice President and General
Manager Specialty Papers Business Unit since
February 2006. Prior to this he was the Companys Director
of Specialty Papers Business Unit, a position he held since
January 2004. From 1994 until January 2004, Mr. Hess held
various technical, manufacturing, sales and business development
positions with Glatfelter.
Jeffrey J. Norton joined us in May 2005 and serves as
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining
Glatfelter, Mr. Norton was with Exelon Corporation, a
$15 billion energy corporation, for 14 years where he
was Assistant General Counsel.
Martin Rapp joined Glatfelter in August 2006 and serves
as Vice President and General Manager Composite
Fibers Business Unit. Prior to this Mr. Rapp was Vice
President and General Manager of Avery Dennisons Roll
Materials Business in Central and Eastern Europe since August
2002. From May 2000 until July 2002 Mr. Rapp was Partner
and Managing Director of BonnConsult.
Mark A. Sullivan was appointed Vice President, Global
Supply Chain in February 2005. Mr. Sullivan joined our
company in December 2003, as Chief Procurement Officer. His
experience includes a broad array of operations and supply chain
management responsibilities during 20 years with the DuPont
Company. He served with
T-Mobile USA
as an independent contractor during 2003, and Concur
Technologies from 1999 until 2002.
William T. Yanavitch II rejoined the Company in May
2005 as Vice President Human Resources and Administration.
Mr. Yanavitch served as Vice President Human Resources from
July 2000 until his resignation in January 2005 at which time he
became Corporate Human Resources Manager of Constellation
Energy. From October 1998 to July 2000, Mr. Yanavitch was
Director of Human Resources for the Ceramco and Trubyte
Divisions of Dentsply.
David C. Elder became Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer in July 2006 after joining the company in
January 2006. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Elder was
Corporate Controller for YORK International Corporation, a
position he held since December 2003. Prior thereto, he was the
Director, Financial Planning and Analysis for YORK International
Corporation from August 2000 to December 2003.
-12-
GLATFELTER
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Common Stock Prices and Dividends Declared Information
The following table shows the high and low prices of our common
stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
GLT and the dividend declared per share for each
quarter during the past two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
15.95
|
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
16.23
|
|
|
|
12.98
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
19.84
|
|
|
|
14.45
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
18.65
|
|
|
|
13.12
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
15.11
|
|
|
$
|
12.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
14.92
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
14.93
|
|
|
|
10.95
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
12.86
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 8, 2007, we had 1,726 shareholders of
record. A number of the shareholders of record are nominees.
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following chart compares the yearly percentage change in the
cumulative total return on our common stock during the five
years ended December 31, 2006, with the cumulative total
return on the S&P MidCap 400 Index and the Companys
Peer Group (1). The comparison assumes $100 was invested on
December 31, 2001, in our common stock, and in each of the
foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.
1) The Companys Peer Group consists of
companies in the same industry as the Company. The returns of
each Company in the Peer Group have been weighted according to
their respective stock market capitalization for purposes of
arriving at the Peer Group average. The members of the Peer
Group are as follows: Bowater, Inc., Chesapeake Corporation,
MeadWestvaco Corporation, Pope and Talbot, Inc., Potlatch
Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., and Wausau
Mosinee Paper Mills Corporation. Certain of the comparable
companies are included in the S&P MidCap 400, and therefore
are represented in both indices in the performance chart.
-13-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
$
|
543,524
|
|
|
$
|
533,193
|
|
|
$
|
540,347
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
10,040
|
|
|
|
9,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
543,233
|
|
|
|
550,161
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
and unusual items
|
|
|
(30,318
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,564
|
)
|
|
|
(20,375
|
)
|
|
|
(24,995
|
)
|
|
|
(2,241
|
)
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
22,053
|
|
|
|
58,509
|
|
|
|
32,334
|
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
20,151
|
|
|
|
32,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
56,102
|
|
|
|
12,986
|
|
|
|
37,637
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share from
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
1,044,977
|
|
|
|
1,052,270
|
|
|
|
1,027,019
|
|
|
|
953,202
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
397,613
|
|
|
|
|
207,073
|
|
|
|
211,227
|
|
|
|
254,275
|
|
|
|
220,532
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
|
|
420,370
|
|
|
|
371,431
|
|
|
|
373,833
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common
share
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
The above Summary of Selected
Consolidated Financial Data, and the comparability thereof,
includes the impact of certain charges and gains from asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries. For a discussion of these
items that affect the comparability of this information, see
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplemental
Data Notes 4 to 6.
|
-14-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements
other than statements of historical fact, including statements
regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial
position or results of operations, made in this Report on
Form 10-K
are forward looking. We use words such as
anticipates, believes,
expects, future, intends and
similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements reflect managements current
expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results
may differ significantly from such expectations. The following
discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding
expectations of, among others, net sales, costs of products
sold, non-cash pension income, environmental costs, capital
expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently
difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ materially from
our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following
important factors, among others, which could cause our results
to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted
or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:
|
|
i.
|
variations in demand for, or pricing of, our products;
|
|
ii.
|
changes in the cost or availability of raw materials we use, in
particular market pulp, pulp substitutes, and abaca fiber, and
changes in energy-related costs;
|
|
iii.
|
our ability to develop new, high value-added Specialty Papers
and Composite Fibers;
|
|
iv.
|
the impact of competition, changes in industry paper production
capacity, including the construction of new mills, the closing
of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or
productivity increases;
|
|
v.
|
our ability to successfully integrate the operations of the
recently acquired Chillicothe and Lydney facilities;
|
|
vi.
|
cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup,
damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or
property damages related thereto, such as the costs of natural
resource restoration or damages related to the presence of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the lower Fox
River on which our former Neenah mill was located; and the costs
of environmental matters at our former Ecusta Division mill;
|
|
vii.
|
the gain or loss of significant customers
and/or
on-going viability of such customers;
|
|
viii.
|
risks associated with our international operations, including
local economic and political environments and fluctuations in
currency exchange rates;
|
|
ix.
|
geopolitical events, including war and terrorism;
|
|
x.
|
enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other
legislation or changes in government policy or regulation;
|
|
xi.
|
adverse results in litigation;
|
|
xii.
|
disruptions in production
and/or
increased costs due to labor disputes;
|
|
xiii.
|
our ability to successfully execute our timberland strategy to
realize the value of our timberlands; and
|
|
xiv.
|
our ability to finance, consummate and integrate future
acquisitions.
|
Introduction We manufacture, both domestically
and internationally, a wide array of specialty papers and
engineered products. Substantially all of our revenue is earned
from the sale of our products to customers in numerous markets,
including book publishing, envelope & converting,
carbonless papers and forms, food and beverage, decorative
laminates for furniture and flooring, and other highly technical
niche markets.
Overview Our results of operations for 2006
reflect stronger market conditions in each of our business units
when compared with 2005. Domestically, the Specialty Papers
business units results in the comparison are positively
influenced by additional volumes associated with the April 2006
Chillicothe acquisition and improved selling prices. However,
input costs in 2006 are higher, primarily energy and raw
material costs.
Our Composite Fibers business units results have also been
positively influenced by additional volumes associated with the
Lydney acquisition as well as improved demand across all of this
units product categories. Average selling prices, however,
have remained flat to lower in the comparison.
-15-
GLATFELTER
The analysis of our financial results for 2006 reflects the
following significant items:
|
|
1)
|
We completed the $65 million acquisition of J R
Cromptons Lydney mill on March 13, 2006. This
mills revenue in 2005 was approximately $75 million;
|
|
2)
|
On April 3, 2006, we completed the acquisition of
Chillicothe, the carbonless paper operation of NewPage
Corporation with 2005 revenue of $441.5 million, for
$83.3 million in cash;
|
|
3)
|
In April 2006, we refinanced our bank credit facility with a
$100 million term loan and a $200 million revolving
credit facility in addition to the issuance of $200 million
71/8%
bonds to replace our $150 million
67/8% notes
due July 2007;
|
|
4)
|
On June 30, 2006, we ceased production at our Neenah, WI
facility and recorded shutdown related charges totaling
$54.4 million;
|
|
5)
|
We incurred acquisition integration costs totaling
$13.6 million in connection with the Chillicothe and Lydney
acquisitions; and
|
|
6)
|
During 2006, we sold 5,923 acres of timberland for
aggregate proceeds of $17.1 million.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
2006
versus 2005
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per diluted share
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 include the following
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
$
|
8,812
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring
charges
|
|
|
(35,212
|
)
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration costs
|
|
|
(8,647
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt redemption premium
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
|
11,258
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These items decreased earnings by $36.7 million, or
$0.82 per diluted share in 2006. Comparatively, the items
identified above positively affected earnings in 2005 by
$23.0 million, or $0.53 per diluted share.
Business Units Results of individual business
units are presented based on our management accounting practices
and management structure. There is no comprehensive,
authoritative body of guidance for management accounting
equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America; therefore, the financial results of
individual business units are not necessarily comparable with
similar information for any other company. The management
accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure
performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined
from time to time as management accounting practices are
enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support
areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated
primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area
services or included in Other and Unallocated in the
following table. Certain prior period information has been
reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Management evaluates business unit results of operations before
non-cash pension income, shutdown and restructuring related
charges, acquisition integration costs, effects of asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this
is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance
of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of
business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core
operations. This presentation is closely aligned with the
management and operating structure of our company. It is also on
this basis that the Companys performance is evaluated
internally and by the Companys Board of Directors.
-16-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit Performance
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
In thousands, except tons
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
Other and Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$693,660
|
|
|
|
|
$380,923
|
|
|
|
$292,751
|
|
|
|
|
$198,137
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
704,386
|
|
|
|
|
391,001
|
|
|
|
292,751
|
|
|
|
|
$198,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
635,143
|
|
|
|
|
340,629
|
|
|
|
246,797
|
|
|
|
|
166,153
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
69,243
|
|
|
|
|
50,372
|
|
|
|
45,954
|
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
(9,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
|
50,285
|
|
|
|
|
39,876
|
|
|
|
28,458
|
|
|
|
|
21,282
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
18,958
|
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
17,496
|
|
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
(36,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
48,985
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
$18,958
|
|
|
|
|
$10,496
|
|
|
|
$17,496
|
|
|
|
|
$10,702
|
|
|
|
$(58,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
$38,942
|
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tons sold
|
|
|
653,734
|
|
|
|
|
450,900
|
|
|
|
68,148
|
|
|
|
|
47,669
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
721,892
|
|
|
|
|
498,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
$32,824
|
|
|
|
|
$35,781
|
|
|
|
$17,197
|
|
|
|
|
$14,866
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$50,021
|
|
|
|
|
$50,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
Costs of Products Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
$407,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
407,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
399,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
$105,294
|
|
|
|
|
$97,176
|
|
|
|
$8,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percent of Net
sales
|
|
|
10.7%
|
|
|
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated
net sales by each business unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of total
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Business Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales totaled $986.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, an increase of $407.3 million, or
70.3%, compared to the same period a year ago. Net sales from
the acquisition of Chillicothes carbonless and forms
business and the Lydney mill totaled $329.9 million. These
acquisitions are reported in the Specialty Papers and Composite
Fibers business units, respectively. Organic growth was driven
by a 4.0% increase in volume and $21.3 million from higher
average selling prices in the Specialty Papers business unit.
Excluding results of the Lydney mill, Composite Fibers
volumes shipped increased 15.6%. The translation of foreign
currencies unfavorably impacted this business units net
sales by $2.5 million and average selling prices declined
$3.5 million compared to the same period a year ago.
In connection with the Chillicothe acquisition, we permanently
shutdown our Neenah, WI facility. Products previously
manufactured at the Neenah facility have been transferred to
Chillicothe. The results of operations for 2006 include related
pre-tax charges of $54.4 million, of which
$25.4 million is reflected in the consolidated income
statement as components of cost of products sold and
$29.0 million is reflected as Shutdown and
restructuring charges.
Costs of products sold totaled $891.8 million for 2006, an
increase of $399.8 million compared with the previous year
As discussed above, the 2006 costs of products sold includes a
$25.4 million charge for inventory write-downs and
accelerated depreciation on property and equipment abandoned in
connection with the Neenah shutdown.
In addition to the shutdown charges, the increase in costs of
products sold was primarily due to the inclusion of the
Chillicothe and Lydney acquisitions and the effect of increased
shipping volumes. In addition, higher raw material and energy
prices increased costs of products sold by approximately
$12.1 million.
Non-Cash Pension Income Non-cash pension
income results from the over-funded status of our pension plans.
The amount of pension income recognized each year is determined
using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors,
including the fair value of our pension assets as of the
beginning of the year. The following summarizes non-cash pension
income, before the curtailment charges recorded in connection
with the Neenah shutdown during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Recorded
as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
$15,480
|
|
|
|
|
$14,844
|
|
|
|
$636
|
|
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$16,993
|
|
|
|
|
$16,517
|
|
|
|
$476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses totaled $92.5 million in 2006 compared to
$67.6 million a year ago. The increase was due to
$13.6 million of acquisition integration costs and
$16.2 million from the inclusion of the Chillicothe and
Lydney acquisitions in the current periods results of
operations. SG&A expenses in 2005 included a
-17-
GLATFELTER
$2.7 million charge for certain matters related to our
former Ecusta division. In addition, the comparison was
favorably affected by lower professional and legal fees in the
period to period comparison.
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and
Timberlands During 2006, 2005 and 2004, we
completed sales of timberlands and, in 2004, the corporate
aircraft. The following table summarizes these transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
$
|
17,130
|
|
|
$
|
15,677
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,071
|
|
|
$
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,327
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,778
|
|
|
$
|
22,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
$
|
56,586
|
|
|
$
|
55,355
|
|
|
|
Corporate Aircraft
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,171
|
|
|
$
|
58,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Recoveries During the 2006 and 2005,
we reached successful resolution of certain claims under
insurance policies related to the Fox River environmental
matter. Insurance recoveries included in the results of
operations totaled $0.2 million in 2006 and
$20.2 million in 2005. All recoveries were received in cash
prior to the end of the applicable period.
Shutdown and Restructuring Charges Neenah
Facility Shutdown As of June 30, 2006 we
permanently shutdown our Neenah facility. The charge incurred in
connection with this action was recorded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
$
|
25,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charge
|
|
|
29,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes shutdown reserve activity during
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-cash-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beg.
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
and cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
balance
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
payments
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$22,466
|
|
|
|
$(22,466
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension curtailments and other
retirement benefit charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and benefit continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
(6,026
|
)
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,367
|
|
|
|
(11,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
(1,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,399
|
|
|
|
(18,622
|
)
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$54,445
|
|
|
|
$(51,668
|
)
|
|
|
$2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Neenah facility supported our Specialty Papers business
unit. Shutdown of this facility resulted in the elimination of
approximately 200 positions. We do not expect any material
additional shutdown related charges in 2007.
As part of the Neenah shutdown, we terminated our long-term
steam supply contract, as provided for within the agreement,
resulting in a termination fee of approximately
$11.4 million.
The results of operations for 2006 and 2005, also include
$1.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of
charges related to the European Restructuring and Optimization
(EURO) Program.
Non-operating income (expense) During April
2006, we completed the placement of a $200 million bond
offering, the proceeds of which were used to redeem the then
outstanding $150 million notes scheduled to mature in July
2007. In connection with the early redemption, a charge of
$2.9 million, related to a redemption premium and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, was recorded in
Consolidated Statement of Income as Non-operating expense under
the caption
Other-net.
Income taxes In 2006 we recorded an income tax
benefit at an effective rate of 45.0% compared to an income tax
provision at an effective rate of 35.8%. The beneficial higher
effective tax rate in 2006 was primarily due to the effect of
state tax law changes and the effect of tax credits, partially
offset by the resolution of certain tax matters.
Foreign Currency We own and operate paper and
pulp mills in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the
Philippines. The local currency in Germany and France is the
Euro, in the UK the British Pound Sterling, and in the
Philippines the currency is the Peso. During 2006, Euro
functional currency operations generated approximately 21.0% of
our sales and 19.8% of operating expenses and British Pound
Sterling operations represented 6.1% of net sales and 6.4% of
operating expenses. The translation of the results from these
international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The table below
summarizes the effect from foreign currency translation on 2006
reported results compared to 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$2,455
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
(4,045
|
)
|
|
|
SG&A expenses
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
Income taxes and other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(1,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
-18-
GLATFELTER
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of
foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of
certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or
competing in multi-currency markets.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
2005
versus 2004
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
|
$
|
543,524
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
|
103,394
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
|
56,102
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted share
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 include the following
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
|
$11,258
|
|
|
|
|
$0.26
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands and
corporate aircraft
|
|
|
$34,151
|
|
|
|
|
$0.78
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
21,310
|
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(12,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The above items increased earnings from continuing operations by
$23.0 million, or $0.52 per diluted share in 2005, and
by $42.7 million, or $0.97 per diluted share, in 2004.
Business Units The following table sets forth
profitability information by business unit and the composition
of consolidated income from continuing operations before income
taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except tons
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
Other and Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$380,923
|
|
|
|
|
$337,436
|
|
|
|
$198,137
|
|
|
|
|
$205,232
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
|
$856
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
|
$543,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
391,001
|
|
|
|
|
347,389
|
|
|
|
198,137
|
|
|
|
|
205,232
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
340,629
|
|
|
|
|
312,136
|
|
|
|
166,153
|
|
|
|
|
163,843
|
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,916
|
)
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
461,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
50,372
|
|
|
|
|
35,253
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
|
41,389
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
|
15,772
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
|
39,876
|
|
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
21,282
|
|
|
|
|
23,067
|
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
|
59,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
|
18,322
|
|
|
|
48,985
|
|
|
|
|
86,436
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
|
103,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12,631
|
)
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
|
|
|
$10,496
|
|
|
|
|
$(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
$10,702
|
|
|
|
|
$18,322
|
|
|
|
$38,942
|
|
|
|
|
$73,805
|
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
|
$90,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tons sold
|
|
|
450,900
|
|
|
|
|
421,504
|
|
|
|
47,669
|
|
|
|
|
48,528
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
498,593
|
|
|
|
|
470,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
$35,781
|
|
|
|
|
$37,186
|
|
|
|
$14,866
|
|
|
|
|
$14,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50,647
|
|
|
|
|
$51,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
Costs of Products Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
|
$
|
543,524
|
|
|
$
|
35,597
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
35,722
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
461,063
|
|
|
|
30,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
$97,176
|
|
|
|
|
$92,414
|
|
|
|
$4,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percent of
Net sales
|
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
|
|
17.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated
net sales by each business unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Business Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
Tobacco Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales totaled $579.1 million in 2005, an increase of
$35.6 million, or 6.6%, compared to a year ago. This growth
was primarily driven by strengthened product pricing and a 7.0%
increase in volumes shipped in the Specialty Papers business
unit compared with the same period of 2004. Higher pricing for
Specialty Papers products increased revenue by
$17.6 million compared to 2004. Composite Fibers
volumes shipped declined approximately 1.8% and lower selling
prices, on a constant currency basis, decreased revenue by
$7.4 million. Costs of products sold increased
$31.0 million in the comparison. In addition to the effect
of increased shipping volumes, higher raw material and energy
prices increased costs of products sold by approximately
$11.1 million. Lower labor costs realized from the 2004
North American Restructuring Program were substantially offset
by higher spending on supplies and maintenance and by the impact
of significant market related downtime in the Composite Fibers
business unit.
-19-
GLATFELTER
Non-Cash Pension Income Non-cash pension
income results from the considerably over-funded status of our
pension plans. The amount of pension income recognized each year
is determined using various actuarial assumptions and certain
other factors, including the fair value of our pension assets as
of the beginning of the year. The following summarizes non-cash
pension income for each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Recorded
as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
$14,844
|
|
|
|
|
$15,937
|
|
|
|
$(1,093
|
)
|
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$16,517
|
|
|
|
|
$17,342
|
|
|
|
$(825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes SG&A expenses, restructuring
charges, gains from asset dispositions and other nonrecurring
items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses
|
|
|
$67,633
|
|
|
|
|
$59,939
|
|
|
|
$7,694
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
(18,811
|
)
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
36,456
|
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
12,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and
Administrative (SG&A) expenses
increased $7.7 million in the comparison primarily due to a
$2.7 million charge to increase our reserve for costs
associated with environmental matters at the former Ecusta
facility located in North Carolina, $2.1 million of
additional variable compensation and $2.0 million of higher
litigation related costs.
Restructuring Charges In 2005 we announced the
EURO Program, a comprehensive series of initiatives designed to
improve the performance of our Composite Fibers business unit.
In the fourth quarter of 2005 we recorded restructuring charges
totaling $1.6 million associated with the related work
force efficiency plans at the Gernsbach, Germany facility. This
charge reflects severance, early retirement and related costs
for the 55 effected employees. We expect to incur cash out
lays in this amount over the next 24 month period.
The restructuring charge incurred in 2004 related to the North
American Restructuring Program and certain actions related to
the Neenah facility.
Insurance Recoveries During 2005 and 2004, we
reached successful resolution of certain claims under insurance
policies related to the Fox River environmental matter.
Insurance recoveries included in the results of operations
totaled $20.2 and $32.8 million in 2005 and 2004,
respectively, and were received in cash. Any additional
insurance recoveries are expected to be insignificant.
Income Taxes The Companys effective tax
rates for 2005 and 2004 were 35.8% and 38.2%, respectively. The
lower effective tax rate in 2005 was primarily due to decreased
amounts of timberland sales in 2005, which are taxed at higher
effective rates, and the effect of tax credits and the related
impact on valuation allowances relative to the level of pre-tax
income.
Foreign Currency We own and operate paper and
pulp mills in Germany, France and the Philippines. The local
currency in Germany and France is the Euro, while in the
Philippines the currency is the Peso. During the year ended
December 31, 2005, these operations generated approximately
29% of our sales and 30% of operating expenses. The translation
of the results from these international operations into
U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant
expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, for environmental
compliance matters and to support our business strategy and
research and development efforts. The following table summarizes
cash flow information for each of the years presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
|
$39,951
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(28,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(181,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,029
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
|
(15,158
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided
|
|
|
(35,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, operations used $28.4 million of cash compared
to $42.9 million of cash provided by operating activities
in the prior year. The change in the comparison was primarily
due $20.0 million of lower insurance recoveries in the
year-to-year,
the use of $21.7 million to settle a cross currency rate
swap that matured in June 2006, $22.4 million used for
working capital associated with the Lydney acquisition,
$18.6 million of Neenah shutdown related payments made
during 2006, partially offset by improved earnings from
operations.
The changes in investing cash flows primarily reflect the use of
approximately $158.4 million to fund the Chillicothe and
Lydney mill acquisitions and increased capital expenditures of
$13.4 million. The acquisitions were financed with
borrowings under our revolving credit facility and new term loan.
During 2006 and 2005, cash dividends paid on common stock
totaled approximately $16.0 million and $15.8 million.
Our Board of Directors determines what,
-20-
GLATFELTER
if any, dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend
payment decisions are based upon then-existing factors and
conditions and, therefore, historical trends of dividend
payments are not necessarily indicative of future payments.
As more fully discussed in Item 8 Financial
Statements, Note 17, on April 3, 2006 we refinanced
the revolving credit facility set forth in the table below. The
significant terms of the new credit facility are also set forth
therein. In addition, on April 28, 2006, we completed a
private placement offering of $200 million aggregate
principal amount of our
71/8% Senior
Notes due 2016. We used the net proceeds to redeem
$150 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding
67/8% notes
due July 2007, plus the payment of the applicable redemption
premium and accrued interest. The following table sets forth our
outstanding long-term indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility, due
April 2011
|
|
|
$64,795
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Term Loan, due April 2011
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility, due June
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
|
|
71/8% Notes,
due May 2016
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67/8% Notes,
due July 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Note payable SunTrust,
due March 2008
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
394,795
|
|
|
|
|
203,650
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(19,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current
portion
|
|
|
$375,295
|
|
|
|
|
$184,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant terms of the debt obligations are set forth in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data, Note 17.
We are subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation
by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental
authorities with respect to the environmental impact of mills we
operate, or have operated. To comply with environmental laws and
regulations, we have incurred substantial capital and operating
expenditures in past years. We anticipate that environmental
regulation of our operations will continue to become more
burdensome and that capital and operating expenditures necessary
to comply with environmental regulations will continue, and
perhaps increase, in the future. In addition, we may incur
obligations to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the
environment resulting from our operations, including the
restoration of natural resources and liability for personal
injury and for damages to property and natural resources. See
Item 8 Financial Statements
Note 19 for a summary of significant environmental matters.
We expect to meet all of our near- and longer-term cash needs
from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash
equivalents, sales of timberland, our existing credit facility
or other bank lines of credit and other long-term debt. However,
as discussed in Item 8 Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data Note 19, an unfavorable
outcome of various environmental matters could have a material
adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, liquidity
and/or
results of operations.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements As of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had not entered into any
off-balance-sheet arrangements. A financial derivative
instrument to which we are a party and guarantees of
indebtedness, which solely consists of obligations of
subsidiaries and a partnership, are reflected in the
consolidated balance sheets included herein in
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
Contractual Obligations The following table
sets forth contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due During the Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 to
|
|
|
2010 to
|
|
|
2012 and
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
beyond
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt (1)
|
|
|
$562,275
|
|
|
|
$44,649
|
|
|
|
$119,331
|
|
|
|
$136,545
|
|
|
|
$261,750
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases (2)
|
|
|
18,699
|
|
|
|
3,539
|
|
|
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
8,085
|
|
|
|
Purchase
obligations (3)
|
|
|
63,651
|
|
|
|
45,733
|
|
|
|
17,778
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term
obligations (4)
|
|
|
103,410
|
|
|
|
8,850
|
|
|
|
16,596
|
|
|
|
18,290
|
|
|
|
59,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$748,035
|
|
|
|
$102,771
|
|
|
|
$158,807
|
|
|
|
$156,948
|
|
|
|
$329,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents principal and interest
payments due on long-term debt. We have $200 million of
debt maturing in May 2016 and bearing a fixed rate of interest
at
71/8%,
payable semiannually, $34 million note maturing in March
2008 and bearing a fixed rate of interest of 3.82%. In addition,
at December 31, 2006, $65 million was outstanding
under our revolving credit facility and $96 million was
outstanding under a term loan. Both the revolving credit
facility and the term loan bear a variable interest rate (6.20%
as of December 31, 2006) and mature in April 2011.
|
(2)
|
|
Represents rental agreements for
various land, buildings, and computer and office equipment.
|
(3)
|
|
Represents open purchase order
commitments and other obligations, primarily for pulpwood
contracts with minimum annual purchase obligations. In certain
situations, prices are subject to variations based on market
prices. In such situations, the information above is based on
prices in effect at December 31, 2006 or expectations based
on historical experience
and/or
current market conditions.
|
(4)
|
|
Represents expected benefits to be
paid pursuant to medical retirement plans and nonqualified
pension plans over the next ten years.
|
-21-
GLATFELTER
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The
preceding discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial
position and results of operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories,
long-lived assets, pension and post-retirement obligations,
environmental liabilities and income taxes. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following represent the most significant and
subjective estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements.
Inventory Reserves We maintain reserves for
excess and obsolete inventories to reflect our inventory at the
lower of its stated cost or market value. Our estimate for
excess and obsolete inventory is based upon our assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. If actual market
conditions are more or less favorable than those we have
projected, we may need to increase or decrease our reserves for
excess and obsolete inventories, which could affect our reported
results of operations.
Long-lived Assets We evaluate the
recoverability of our long-lived assets, including property,
equipment and intangible assets periodically or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts
may not be recoverable. Our evaluations include analyses based
on the cash flows generated by the underlying assets,
profitability information, including estimated future operating
results, trends or other determinants of fair value. If the
value of an asset determined by these evaluations is less than
its carrying amount, a loss is recognized for the difference
between the fair value and the carrying value of the asset.
Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating
results of the related business may indicate an inability to
recover the carrying value of the assets, thereby possibly
requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement
Obligations Accounting for defined-benefit
pension plans, and any curtailments thereof, requires various
assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates,
expected rates of return on plan assets and future compensation
growth rates. Accounting for our retiree medical plans, and any
curtailments thereof, also requires various assumptions, which
include, but are not limited to, discount rates and annual rates
of increase in the per capita costs of health care benefits. We
evaluate these assumptions at least once each year or as facts
and circumstances dictate and make changes as conditions
warrant. Changes to these assumptions will increase or decrease
our reported income, which will result in changes to the
recorded benefit plan assets and liabilities.
Environmental Liabilities We maintain accruals
for losses associated with environmental obligations when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
legislation and remediation technologies. These accruals are
adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions
continue
and/or
further legal or technical information develops. Such
undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other
claims against third parties. Recoveries of environmental
remediation costs from other parties, including insurance
carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured
beyond a reasonable doubt.
Income Taxes We record the estimated future
tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our balance
sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.
These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such
amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. We regularly
review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on
historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the
expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences and tax planning strategies. If we are unable to
generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a
material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period
within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable
or deductible, we could be required to increase the valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets, which may result in a
substantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material
adverse impact on our reported results.
Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same
level of uncertainties as those discussed above, are
nevertheless important to an understanding of the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Refer to Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional accounting
policies.
-22-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average principal outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fixed interest rates
Bond
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$204,980
|
|
|
At fixed interest rates
SunTrust Note
|
|
34,000
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
32,914
|
|
|
At variable interest rates
|
|
149,983
|
|
134,545
|
|
114,858
|
|
92,358
|
|
19,574
|
|
160,795
|
|
160,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$394,795
|
|
$398,689
|
|
|
On fixed interest rate
debt Bond
|
|
7.13%
|
|
7.13%
|
|
7.13%
|
|
7.13%
|
|
7.13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On variable interest rate
debt SunTrust Note
|
|
3.82
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On variable interest rate debt
|
|
6.20
|
|
6.19
|
|
6.19
|
|
6.18
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in
interest rates and currency exchange rates. At December 31,
2006, we had long-term debt outstanding of $394.8 million,
of which $160.8 million or 40.7% was at variable interest
rates.
The table above presents average principal outstanding and
related interest rates for the next five years. Fair values
included herein have been determined based upon rates currently
available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities.
Variable-rate debt outstanding represents borrowings under our
revolving credit facility that incur interest based on the
domestic prime rate or a Eurocurrency rate, at our option, plus
a margin. At December 31, 2006, the interest rate paid was
6.20%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease
in the interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or
decrease annual interest expense by $1.6 million.
We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in
foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are
conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. During
2006, Euro functional currency operations generated
approximately 21% of our sales and 19.8% of operating expenses
and British Pound Sterling operations represented 6.1% of net
sales and 6.4% of operating expenses.
-23-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of P. H. Glatfelter Company (the
Company) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed under the supervision of the chief executive
and chief financial officers to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of the Companys financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
As of December 31, 2006, management conducted an assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). We excluded from our assessment the internal
control over financial reporting at the Lydney and Chillicothe
facilities, which were acquired on March 13, 2006, and April 3,
2006, respectively, and whose total assets constitute a combined
24% of total assets, and which represented a combined 33%
percent of total net sales, of the consolidated financial
statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31,
2006. Based on this assessment, management has determined that
the Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006 is effective to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of the Companys financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies
and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions
and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management; and provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets
that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, has been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report appearing herein, which expresses
unqualified opinions on managements assessment and on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.
The Companys management, including the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect
all errors and all frauds. A control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of
controls is based, in part, on certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks.
Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
-24-
GLATFELTER
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
P. H. Glatfelter Company
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that P. H. Glatfelter and subsidiaries
(the Company) maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal
control over financial reporting at the Lydney and Chillicothe
facilities, which were acquired on March 13, 2006, and
April 3, 2006, respectively, and whose total assets
constitute a combined 24% of total assets, and which represented
a combined 33% percent of total net sales, of the consolidated
financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Accordingly, our audit did not include
the internal control over financial reporting at the Lydney and
Chillicothe facilities. The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, of
the Company and our report dated March 15, 2007, expressed
an unqualified opinion on these financial statements and
included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), as of
December 31, 2006.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2007
-25-
GLATFELTER
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
P. H. Glatfelter Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), as of December 31, 2006.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
March 15, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting and an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2007
-26-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share amounts
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
$543,524
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
461,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
59,939
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
Gains on disposition of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
103,394
|
|
|
|
Other nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
(24,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13,083
|
)
|
|
|
(13,385
|
)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other nonoperating expense
|
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
(12,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
60,140
|
|
|
|
90,763
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
(9,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
21,531
|
|
|
|
34,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
$(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
$56,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
|
44,013
|
|
|
|
43,856
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
|
44,343
|
|
|
|
44,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) Per
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
$(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
$0.88
|
|
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-27-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands, except par values
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (less
allowance for doubtful accounts: 2006 $3,613;
2005 $931)
|
|
|
|
|
128,255
|
|
|
|
|
62,524
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
192,281
|
|
|
|
|
81,248
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
32,517
|
|
|
|
|
22,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
375,038
|
|
|
|
|
223,557
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and
timberlands net
|
|
|
|
|
528,867
|
|
|
|
|
478,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
321,738
|
|
|
|
|
342,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
$1,044,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
$19,500
|
|
|
|
|
$19,650
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
86,488
|
|
|
|
|
31,132
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
|
7,575
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
74,960
|
|
|
|
|
74,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
193,290
|
|
|
|
|
139,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
375,295
|
|
|
|
|
184,000
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
|
206,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
86,031
|
|
|
|
|
82,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
837,275
|
|
|
|
|
612,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value;
authorized 120,000,000 shares;
issued 54,361,980 shares (including shares in
treasury:
2006 9,540,770; 2005 10,229,734)
|
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
|
|
42,288
|
|
|
|
|
43,450
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
519,489
|
|
|
|
|
547,810
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
(32,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,984
|
|
|
|
|
584,166
|
|
|
|
Less cost of common stock in
treasury
|
|
|
|
|
(141,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
(151,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
$1,044,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-28-
GLATFELTER
P.H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
$(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
$56,102
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net
cash (used) provided by operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
|
50,647
|
|
|
|
51,598
|
|
|
|
Pension income
|
|
|
|
|
(16,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16,517
|
)
|
|
|
(17,342
|
)
|
|
|
Restructuring charges and unusual
items
|
|
|
|
|
37,066
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
16,483
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
(12,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
17,364
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
(17,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,876
|
)
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
(8,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6,195
|
)
|
|
|
(4,276
|
)
|
|
|
Other assets and prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
(12,721
|
)
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
(36,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,956
|
)
|
|
|
(10,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by
operations
|
|
|
|
|
(28,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
39,584
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and
timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
(44,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31,024
|
)
|
|
|
(18,587
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
21,071
|
|
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
60,171
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary,
net of cash divested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Chillicothe
|
|
|
|
|
(89,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of
Glatfelter UK (Lydney)
|
|
|
|
|
(69,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(181,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,029
|
)
|
|
|
42,109
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from (repayments of)
revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
42,527
|
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
(44,888
|
)
|
|
|
Net proceeds from
$100 million term loan facility
|
|
|
|
|
94,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from
$200 million
71/8%
note offering
|
|
|
|
|
196,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of $150 million
67/8%
notes
|
|
|
|
|
(152,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
|
|
(15,782
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit of stock options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
|
(15,158
|
)
|
|
|
(59,753
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
(35,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
24,385
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the
beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
57,442
|
|
|
|
|
39,951
|
|
|
|
15,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the
end of period
|
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
$39,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow
information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
$26,218
|
|
|
|
|
$12,378
|
|
|
|
$11,713
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
17,579
|
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-29-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
In thousands, except shares outstanding
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
40,469
|
|
|
$
|
484,756
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,690
|
|
|
$
|
(157,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
371,431
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,102
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,180
|
|
Tax effect on employee stock
options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,802
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock units,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Delivery of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
401(k) plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Employee stock options
exercised net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
41,828
|
|
|
|
525,056
|
|
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|
|
8,768
|
|
|
|
(154,551
|
)
|
|
|
420,370
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension
liability, net of tax benefits of $2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,498
|
|
Tax effect on employee stock
options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,855
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,855
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock units,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Delivery of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Employee stock options
exercised net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
43,450
|
|
|
|
547,810
|
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
(5,343
|
)
|
|
|
(151,854
|
)
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to minimum pension
liability prior to adoption of SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
Reversal of minimum pension
liability under SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
Additional net pension liability,
net of tax benefit of $27,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,829
|
)
|
Adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect on employee stock
options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,085
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
expense RSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
Delivery of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
401(k) plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Employee stock options
exercised net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,325
|
|
|
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
42,288
|
|
|
$
|
519,489
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(32,337
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-30-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries
(Glatfelter) is a manufacturer of specialty papers
and engineered products. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania,
our manufacturing facilities are located in Spring Grove,
Pennsylvania; Chillicothe and Freemont, Ohio; Gloucestershire,
the United Kingdom; Gernsbach, Germany; Scaër, France and
the Philippines. Our products are marketed throughout the United
States and in over 80 other countries, either through wholesale
paper merchants, brokers and agents or directly to customers.
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Glatfelter and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Accounting Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the
preparation of these consolidated financial statements are
reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known
circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ
from those estimates and assumptions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents We classify all
highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three
months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Raw materials and in-process and
finished inventories of our domestic manufacturing operations
are valued using the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method, and the supplies inventories are valued
principally using the average-cost method. Inventories at our
foreign operations are valued using a method that approximates
average cost.
Plant, Equipment and Timberlands For financial
reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets. For income taxes purposes, depreciation is
primarily calculated using accelerated methods over lives
established by statute or U.S. Treasury Department
procedures. Provision is made for deferred income taxes
applicable to this difference.
The range of estimated service lives used to calculate financial
reporting depreciation for principal items of plant and
equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10 45 Years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
7 35 Years
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4 40 Years
|
|
Maintenance and Repairs Maintenance and
repairs costs are charged to income and major renewals and
betterments are capitalized. At the time property is retired or
sold, the net carrying value is eliminated and any resultant
gain or loss is included in income.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill We
evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when a specific event
indicates that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability is assessed based on estimates of
future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual
disposition of the asset. If the sum of expected undiscounted
cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, an
impairment loss is recognized. Goodwill is reviewed for
impairment on a discounted cash flow basis at least annually.
Impairment losses, if any, are recognized for the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Asset Retirement Obligations In accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations, as interpreted by Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 143
(FIN No. 47), we accrue asset retirement
obligations, if any, in the period in which obligations relating
to future asset retirements are incurred. Under these standards,
costs are to be accrued at estimated fair value, and a related
long-lived asset is capitalized. Over time, the liability is
accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset for which
the obligation exists. Upon settlement of the liability, we
recognize a gain or loss for any difference between the
settlement amount and the liability recorded. Asset retirement
obligations with indeterminate settlement dates are not recorded
until such dates can be reasonably estimated. At
December 31, 2006, we do not have any obligations required
to be accrued under FIN No. 47.
Income Taxes Income taxes are determined using
asset and the liability method of accounting for
-31-
GLATFELTER
income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109
(SFAS No. 109). Under
SFAS No. 109, tax expense includes US and
international income taxes plus the provision for US taxes on
undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries not deemed
to be permanently invested. Tax credits and other incentives
reduce tax expense in the year the credits are claimed. Certain
items of income and expense are not reported in tax returns and
financial statements in the same year. The tax effect of such
temporary differences is reported in deferred income taxes.
Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not
that the assets will be realized in future years. The Company
establishes a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for
which realization is not likely.
The Company accounts for income tax contingencies in accordance
with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies.
Treasury Stock Common stock purchased for
treasury is recorded at cost. At the date of subsequent reissue,
the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock
on the weighted-average cost basis.
Foreign Currency Translation Our subsidiaries
outside the United States use their local currency as the
functional currency. Accordingly, translation gains and losses
and the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions
designated as hedges of net foreign investments are included as
a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction
gains and losses are included in income in the period in which
they occur.
Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue on
product sales when the customer takes title and assumes the
risks and rewards of ownership. We record revenue net of an
allowance for customer returns and rebates.
Revenue from energy sales is recognized when electricity is
delivered to the customer. Certain costs associated with the
production of electricity, such as fuel, labor, depreciation and
maintenance are netted against energy sales for presentation on
the Consolidated Statements of Income. Costs netted against
energy sales totaled $8.4 million, $7.3 million and
$8.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Our current contract to sell
electricity generated in excess of our own use expires in the
year 2010 and requires that the customer purchase all of our
excess electricity up to a certain level. The price for the
electricity is determined pursuant to a formula and varies
depending upon the amount sold in any given year.
Environmental Liabilities Accruals for losses
associated with environmental obligations are recorded when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
legislation and remediation technologies. Costs related to
environmental remediation are charged to expense. These accruals
are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions
continue
and/or
further legal or technical information develops. Such
undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other
claims against third parties. Environmental costs are
capitalized if the costs extend the life of the asset, increase
its capacity
and/or
mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations.
Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other
parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets
when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income The
amounts reported on the consolidated Statement of
Shareholders Equity for other Comprehensive income consist
of $43.8 million of additional pension liability and
$11.5 million of gains from foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of tax.
Stock-based Compensation Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment utilizing the modified
prospective method. This standard requires employee stock
options and other stock-based compensation awards to be
accounted for under the fair value method, and eliminates the
ability to account for these instruments under the intrinsic
value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, and allowed
under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not have a material
effect on our consolidated results of operation or financial
position.
Pro Forma Information No compensation expense
has been recognized for the issuance of non-qualified stock
options. No stock options were granted in 2006 or 2005. The
weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during
2004 was $3.31.
The fair value of each option on the date of grant was estimated
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4
|
.50%
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
3
|
.17
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
35
|
.00
|
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
6
|
.5 yrs
|
|
|
|
|
-32-
GLATFELTER
The following table sets forth pro forma information as if
compensation expense for all stock-based compensation had been
determined consistent with the fair value method of
SFAS No. 123.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
|
$
|
38,609
|
|
|
$
|
56,102
|
|
|
|
Add: stock-based compensation
expense included in reported net income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
Less: stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value based method for all awards,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
$
|
38,580
|
|
|
$
|
55,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
|
$0.88
|
|
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
common shares outstanding during the respective periods. Diluted
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the
weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of common
share equivalents is considered in the diluted earnings per
share computation using the treasury stock method.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets, and
short-term debt approximate fair value. The following table sets
forth carrying value and fair value of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
394,795
|
|
|
$
|
398,689
|
|
|
|
$
|
203,650
|
|
|
$
|
206,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. RECENT
PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective December 31, 2006 we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment to FASB Statements No. 97, 88, 106, and
132(R), (SFAS No. 158) which
requires entities to recognize the over funded or under funded
status of pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans.
In the year of adoption, the effect of recognizing additional
liabilities is effected through a charge to accumulated other
comprehensive income. Accordingly, the accompanying financial
statements include an after tax charge of $43.8 million to
adopt SFAS No. 158.
The following table provides a breakdown of the incremental
effect of applying this statement on individual line items in
the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
of
|
|
adoption
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS
|
|
SFAS
|
|
of SFAS
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
No. 158
|
|
No. 158
|
|
No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
371.4
|
|
|
$
|
(49.7
|
)
|
|
|
$321.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
71.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
$86.0
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
206.6
|
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)
|
|
|
182.7
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
(32.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which will become effective for the
Company on January 1, 2007. The Interpretation prescribes a
recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those
benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be
more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing
authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. We will be required to
apply the provisions of FIN 48 to all tax positions upon
initial adoption with any cumulative effect adjustment to be
recognized as an adjustment to retained earnings. Upon adoption,
management estimates that a cumulative effect adjustment of
approximately $3 million to $5 million will be charged
to retained earnings to increase reserves for uncertain tax
positions, which is subject to revision as we complete our
analysis.
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements was issued. SFAS No. 157, which defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and requires
expanded disclosures about the fair value measurements, is
effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. We do not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Lydney On March 8, 2006, we entered into
a definitive agreement to acquire, through Glatfelter-UK Limited
(GLT-UK), a wholly-owned subsidiary, certain assets
and liabilities of J R Crompton Limited
(Crompton), a global supplier of wet laid non-woven
products based in Manchester, United Kingdom. On
February 7, 2006, Crompton was placed into Administration,
the U.K. equivalent of bankruptcy.
Effective March 13, 2006, we completed our purchase of
Cromptons Lydney mill and related
-33-
GLATFELTER
inventory, located in Gloucestershire, UK for
£37.5 million (US $65.0 million) in cash in
addition to $4.2 million of transaction costs. The Lydney
facility employs about 240 people, produces a broad
portfolio of wet laid non-woven products, including tea and
coffee filter papers, clean room wipes, lens tissue, dye filter
paper, double-sided adhesive tape substrates and battery grid
pasting tissue, and had 2005 revenues of approximately
£43 million (US $75 million). The purchase
price was financed with existing cash balances and borrowings
under our credit facility.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company has
guaranteed all of the obligations of GLT-UK thereunder.
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the
purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$8,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less acquisition related liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$69,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts set forth above ascribed to intangible assets and
other primarily consists of technology and trade marks.
We are currently conducting discovery on five sets of claims to
the Bristol, England Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal
and failure to consult with union prior to staffing reductions
and the sale of the Lydney mill. All of the claims relate to the
period prior to the sale of the Lydney mill to Glatfelter. We
are vigorously defending these claims. The amount claimed, as
indicated in schedules of loss filed to date is approximately
$1.4 million
Chillicothe On April 3, 2006, we
completed our acquisition of Chillicothe, the carbonless
business operations of NewPage Corporation, for
$83.3 million in cash, in addition to approximately
$5.9 million of transaction and other related costs. The
Chillicothe assets consist of paper making facility in
Chillicothe, Ohio with annual production capacity approximating
400,000
tons-per-year
and coating operations based in Fremont, Ohio. Chillicothe had
revenue of $441.5 million in 2005 and a total of
approximately 1,700 employees. The Chillicothe acquisition was
financed with borrowings under our credit facility.
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the
purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
$43,618
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
91,580
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension and other assets
|
|
|
11,416
|
|
|
|
Intangibles customer
relationships
|
|
|
6,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,647
|
|
|
|
Less acquisition related
liabilities including accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(65,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$89,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Forma Financial Information The
information necessary to provide certain pro forma financial
data for the Chillicothe acquisition relative to net income and
earnings per share is not readily available due to the nature of
the accounting and reporting structure of the acquired operation
prior to the acquisition date. Pro forma consolidated net sales
for the 2006 and 2005 were approximately $1.1 billion and
$1.0 billion, respectively, assuming the acquisition
occurred at the beginning of the respective periods. For the
full year 2005, on a pro forma basis, net income was
$40.9 million and diluted EPS was $0.92.
This unaudited pro forma financial information above is not
necessarily indicative of what the operating results would have
been had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the
respective period nor is it indicative of future results.
|
|
5.
|
NEENAH
FACILITY SHUTDOWN
|
In connection with our agreement to acquire the Chillicothe
operations, we committed to a plan to permanently close the
Neenah, WI facility. Production at this facility ceased
effective June 30, 2006 and certain products previously
manufactured at the Neenah facility have been transferred to
Chillicothe.
The following table summarizes shutdown reserve activity during
the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beg.
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
and cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
balance
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
payments
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,466
|
|
|
$
|
(22,466
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension curtailments and other
retirement benefit charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and benefit continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
(6,026
|
)
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,367
|
|
|
|
(11,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
(1,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,399
|
|
|
|
(18,622
|
)
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,445
|
|
|
$
|
(51,668
|
)
|
|
|
$2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
-34-
GLATFELTER
The Neenah shutdown resulted in the elimination of approximately
200 position that had been supporting our Specialty Papers
business unit. Approximately $25.4 million of the Neenah
shutdown related charges are recorded as part of costs of
products sold in the accompanying statements of income. The
amounts accrued for severance and benefit continuation are
recorded as other current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
As part of the Neenah shutdown, we terminated our long-term
steam supply contract, as provided for within the agreement,
resulting in a termination fee of approximately
$11.4 million.
European Restructuring and Optimization Program (EURO
Program) During the fourth quarter of 2005,
we began to implement this restructuring program, a
comprehensive series of initiatives designed to improve the
performance of our Composite Fibers business unit. In 2006 and
2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.2 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, associated with the related
work force efficiency plans at the Gernsbach, Germany facility.
This charge reflects severance, early retirement and related
costs for the affected employees. We expect to incur cash out
lays in this amount over the next 24 month period.
North American Restructuring Program The North
American Restructuring Program, which was initiated in the
second quarter of 2004, was designed to improve operating
results by enhancing product and service offerings in Specialty
Papers book publishing markets, growing revenue from
uncoated specialty papers, reducing our workforce at our Spring
Grove facility by approximately 20%, and implementing improved
supply chain management processes. In conjunction with this
initiative, we negotiated a new labor agreement that enables us
to achieve targeted workforce reduction levels at our Spring
Grove, PA facility. As part of the new labor agreement, we
offered a voluntary early retirement benefits package to
eligible employees. These special termination benefits resulted
in a charge of $16.5 million in 2004, substantially all of
which was for enhanced pension benefits, post-retirement medical
benefits and other related employee severance costs. In
addition, we recorded restructuring charges totaling
$0.7 million, for severance and related pension and other
post employment benefits (OPEB) associated with the
elimination of certain non-represented positions.
Amounts representing enhanced pension benefits will be paid from
our pension plan assets and are recorded as a reduction to the
carrying value of our prepaid pension assets. The amounts for
OPEB benefits were recorded as Other long-term
liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets. We will pay the OPEB benefits as they are incurred over
the course of the affected employees benefit period.
|
|
7.
|
GAIN ON
DISPOSITIONS OF PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, we completed sales of timberlands
and, in 2004, the corporate aircraft. The following table
summarizes these transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Acres
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
5,923
|
|
$
|
17,130
|
|
|
$
|
15,677
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,071
|
|
|
$
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
2,488
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,327
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,778
|
|
|
$
|
22,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
4,482
|
|
$
|
56,586
|
|
|
$
|
55,355
|
|
|
|
Corporate Aircraft
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,171
|
|
|
$
|
58,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
$56,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding used in basic EPS
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
44,013
|
|
|
|
43,856
|
|
|
|
Common shares issuable upon
exercise of dilutive stock options, restricted stock awards and
performance awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding and common share equivalents used in diluted EPS
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
44,343
|
|
|
|
44,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
$(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
$0.88
|
|
|
|
$1.28
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the potential common shares
outstanding for stock options and restricted stock units that
were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the
period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
Potential common shares
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
GAIN ON
INSURANCE RECOVERIES
|
During 2006, 2005 and 2004, we reached successful resolution of
certain claims under insurance policies related to the Fox River
environmental matter. Insurance recoveries included in the
results of operations totaled $0.2 million,
$20.2 million and $32.8 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, and were received in cash.
-35-
GLATFELTER
Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or
refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax
returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on
enacted tax laws and rates.
The provision for income taxes from operations consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
$1,009
|
|
|
|
|
$14,881
|
|
|
|
$8,982
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
3,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
|
18,511
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(11,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
|
|
14,292
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(2,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
17,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
$(9,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
$21,531
|
|
|
|
$34,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are domestic and foreign components of pretax
income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
$(30,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
$55,865
|
|
|
|
$78,627
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
7,782
|
|
|
|
|
4,275
|
|
|
|
12,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
$90,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the income tax provision, computed by
applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes from operations, and the actual income tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax provision at
statutory rate
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal
income tax benefit
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign income tax rate differential
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for tax matters, net
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(45.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sources of deferred income taxes were as follows at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
current
|
|
|
Current
|
|
current
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
$8,239
|
|
|
|
$5,310
|
|
|
|
|
$6,082
|
|
|
|
$8,817
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
4,460
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
20,266
|
|
|
|
|
1,992
|
|
|
|
10,683
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,492
|
)
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
(88,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(98,261
|
)
|
|
|
Installment Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,701
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,897
|
)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
(5,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
(4,315
|
)
|
|
|
Tax carry forwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
17,789
|
|
|
|
(160,165
|
)
|
|
|
|
11,018
|
|
|
|
(188,166
|
)
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(22,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(18,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,730
|
|
|
$
|
(182,659
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
10,992
|
|
|
$
|
(206,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities are
included in the following balance sheet captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
$18,018
|
|
|
|
$11,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
206,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, we had state and foreign tax net
operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of
$106.8 million and $7.0 million, respectively. These
NOL carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income,
if any. The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2007 and
2026; the foreign NOL carryforwards do not expire.
In addition, we had federal charitable contribution
carryforwards of $7.4 million, which expire in 2008,
federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $0.3 million,
which expire in 2013, and various state tax credit carryforwards
totaling $0.8 million, which expire between 2007 and 2020.
We have established a valuation allowance of $22.5 million
against the net deferred tax assets, primarily due to the
uncertainty regarding the ability to utilize state tax
carryforwards and certain deferred foreign tax credits.
We operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and in the
normal course of business are examined in various jurisdictions.
Tax accruals related to the estimated outcome of these
examinations are recorded in accordance with
SFAS No. 5. The reversal of accruals is recorded when
examinations are completed, statutes of limitations close or tax
laws change. A net expense of $0.8 million was recorded in
2006, $1.3 million was recorded in 2005, and
$0.3 million was recorded in 2004 related to domestic and
foreign examination audits and risks. Tax credits and other
incentives reduce tax expense in the year the credits are
claimed. In 2006, we recorded tax credits of $1.8 million
related to research and development, fuels tax and the
electricity production tax credits. In 2005 and 2004 similar tax
credits of $1.8 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, were recorded.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, unremitted earnings of
subsidiaries outside the United States deemed to be permanently
reinvested totaled $69.9 million and $57.9 million,
respectively. Because the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries
are deemed to be permanently reinvested as of December 31,
2006, no deferred tax liability has been recognized in our
consolidated financial statements.
-36-
GLATFELTER
|
|
11.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
On April 25, 2005, shareholders approved the
P. H. Glatfelter 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan
(2005 Plan) to authorize, among other things, the
issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of Glatfelter common
stock to eligible participants. The 2005 Plan, which replaced
the 1992 Long Term Incentive Plan, provides for the issuance of
restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, non-qualified
stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and
performance units. As of December 31, 2006,
1,348,626 shares of common stock were available for future
issuance under the 2005 Plan.
Restricted Stock Units The following table
summarizes RSU activity during the past three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
290,662
|
|
|
|
|
157,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
145,398
|
|
|
|
|
158,982
|
|
|
|
165,680
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(24,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25,600
|
)
|
|
|
(8,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
411,154
|
|
|
|
|
290,662
|
|
|
|
157,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense
|
|
|
$1,107
|
|
|
|
|
$919
|
|
|
|
$332
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant fair value per unit for awards in
2006, 2005 and 2004 was $16.10, $13.98 and $10.98. As of
December 31, 2006, unrecognized compensation expense for
outstanding RSUs totaled $3.0 million. The weighted average
remaining period over which the expense will be recognized is
3.25 years.
Awards of RSU are made under our 2005 Plan. Under terms of the
awards, the RSUs vest based solely on the passage of time on a
graded scale over a three, four, and five-year period.
Non-Qualified Stock Options The following
table summarizes the activity with respect to non-qualified
options to purchase shares of common stock granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,553,209
|
|
|
$
|
14.06
|
|
|
|
|
2,098,612
|
|
|
$
|
14.65
|
|
|
|
2,304,339
|
|
|
$
|
14.71
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(560,239
|
)
|
|
|
13.38
|
|
|
|
|
(111,542
|
)
|
|
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
(72,850
|
)
|
|
|
12.61
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(86,760
|
)
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
|
|
|
(433,861
|
)
|
|
|
17.30
|
|
|
|
(184,127
|
)
|
|
|
15.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
|
14.17
|
|
|
|
|
1,553,209
|
|
|
|
14.06
|
|
|
|
2,098,612
|
|
|
|
14.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
$
|
14.17
|
|
|
|
|
1,547,422
|
|
|
$
|
14.07
|
|
|
|
1,956,439
|
|
|
$
|
15.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
$10.78 to $12.41
|
|
|
191,960
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
12.10
|
|
|
|
191,960
|
|
|
$
|
12.10
|
|
|
|
12.95 to 14.44
|
|
|
374,000
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
13.36
|
|
|
|
374,000
|
|
|
|
13.36
|
|
|
|
15.44 to 17.16
|
|
|
251,900
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
251,900
|
|
|
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
17.54 to 18.78
|
|
|
88,350
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
18.39
|
|
|
|
88,350
|
|
|
|
18.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2003, the Compensation Committee accelerated the
vesting of options granted during December 2001 and December
2002, to become fully vested as of January 1, 2004. Vesting
was accelerated for an aggregate of 639,610 shares, of
which 98,300 were previously vested under their original terms.
Since the options exercise price was greater than the
market value of the underlying common stock at the time vesting
was accelerated, no compensation expense was recognized. All
options expire on the earlier of termination or, in some
instances, a defined period subsequent to termination of
employment, or ten years from the date of grant.
The exercise price represents the average quoted market price of
Glatfelter common stock on the date of grant, or the average
quoted market prices of Glatfelter common stock on the first day
before and after the date of grant for which quoted market price
information was available if such information was not available
on the date of grant.
|
|
12.
|
RETIREMENT
PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
We have both funded and, with respect to our international
operations, unfunded noncontributory defined-benefit pension
plans covering substantially all of our employees. The benefits
are based, in the case of certain plans, on average salary and
years of service and, in the case of other plans, on a fixed
amount for each year of service. Plan provisions and funding
meet the
-37-
GLATFELTER
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974. We use a December 31-measurement date for all of our
defined benefit plans.
We also provide certain health care benefits to eligible retired
employees. These benefits include a comprehensive medical plan
for retirees prior to age 65 and fixed supplemental premium
payments to retirees over age 65 to help defray the costs
of Medicare. The plan is not funded and claims are paid as
reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Change in Benefit
Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
316.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
295.2
|
|
|
|
$48.3
|
|
|
|
|
$46.7
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain)/loss
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe acquisition
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
378.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
316.3
|
|
|
|
$57.9
|
|
|
|
|
$48.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
471.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
465.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe acquisition
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of
year
|
|
$
|
579.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
471.6
|
|
|
|
$10.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
155.3
|
|
|
|
$(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)
|
|
|
Unrecognized loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
245.3
|
|
|
|
$(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(32.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The net prepaid pension cost for qualified pension plans is
primarily included in Other assets, and the accrued
pension cost for non-qualified pension plans and accrued
post-retirement benefit costs are primarily included in
Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The amounts
set forth for Employer contributions include a
$12.2 million transfer from the qualified pension plan
assets to a post-retirement medical plan sub-account pursuant to
Section 420 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such amounts are
to be used to satisfy certain post-retirement health care
expenses.
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of
the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
230.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
264.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)
|
|
|
(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32.6
|
)
|
|
|
Other assets intangible
asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income, pre-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
245.3
|
|
|
|
$(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(32.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The components of amounts recognized as Accumulated other
comprehensive income consist of the following on a pre-tax
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost/(credit)
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
$
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit
pension plans was $366.7 million and $297.7 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit
obligations above were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Discount rate benefit
obligation
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
Future compensation growth rate
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) cost includes the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
$6.0
|
|
|
|
|
$3.7
|
|
|
|
|
$3.9
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(44.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.4
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of transition asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit income
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment and settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit income
|
|
|
$(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
$1.7
|
|
|
|
|
$1.1
|
|
|
|
|
$1.0
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
$8.6
|
|
|
|
|
$4.4
|
|
|
|
|
$9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss and prior service cost for our defined
benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over
the next fiscal year are $0.6 million and
$2.3 million, respectively.
-38-
GLATFELTER
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the net
periodic benefit (income) cost information above were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate benefit
expense
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
%
|
|
|
Future compensation growth rate
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.0
|
|
|
|
4
|
.0
|
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return
on
plan assets
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
.5
|
|
|
|
8
|
.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate benefit
expense
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
%
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return
on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To develop the expected long-term rate of return assumption, we
considered the historical returns and the future expected
returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset
allocation of the pension portfolio. This resulted in the
selection of the 8.5% long-term rate of return on plan assets
assumption for 2006 and 2005.
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed
for next year
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
11.0%
|
|
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate
is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
Year that the rate reaches the
ultimate rate
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one
percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates
would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage Point
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
increase
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
5,415
|
|
|
$
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
|
Total of service and interest cost
components
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets Glatfelters pension plan
weighted-average allocations at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
Cash and fixed income
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Our objective is to achieve an above-market rate of return on
our pension plan assets. Based upon this objective, along with
the timing of benefit payments and the risks associated with
various asset classes available for investment, we have
established the following asset allocation guidelines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
Fixed Income & Other
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate can be between 0% and 5% of the target equity
allocation. Glatfelter stock can also be between 0% and 5% of
the target equity allocation, although there were no holdings of
Glatfelter stock as of December 31, 2006 or 2005. Our
investment policy prohibits the investment in certain securities
without the approval of the Finance Committee of the Board of
Directors. Regarding Fixed Income securities, the
weighted-average credit quality will be at least AA
with a BBB minimum credit quality for each issue.
Cash Flow We do not expect to make
contributions to our qualified pension plans in 2007.
Contributions and benefit payments expected to be made in 2007
under our non-qualified pension plans and other benefit plans
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified pension plans
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
Other benefit plans
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$21,525
|
|
|
|
$5,373
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
21,177
|
|
|
|
5,142
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
20,954
|
|
|
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
21,517
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
2012 through 2016
|
|
|
116,352
|
|
|
|
36,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Plans We maintain 401(k)
plans for certain hourly and salaried employees. Employees may
contribute up to 15% of their salary to these plans, subject to
certain restrictions. We will match a portion of the
employees contribution, subject to certain limitations, in
the form of shares of Glatfelter common stock. The expense
associated with our 401(k) match was $1.2 million,
$0.6 million and $0.7 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Inventories, net of reserves were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
$38,539
|
|
|
|
$16,392
|
|
|
|
In-process and finished
|
|
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
39,930
|
|
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
45,931
|
|
|
|
24,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$192,281
|
|
|
|
$81,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we had valued all inventories using the average-cost method,
inventories would have been $13.3 million and
$12.7 million higher than reported at December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. During 2005 we liquidated certain
LIFO inventories, the effect of which did not have a significant
impact on results of operations.
-39-
GLATFELTER
|
|
14.
|
PLANT,
EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands at December 31 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
$135,836
|
|
|
|
|
$132,962
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
911,964
|
|
|
|
|
888,660
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86,606
|
|
|
|
|
82,098
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(617,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
(641,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,962
|
|
|
|
|
462,650
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
|
13,940
|
|
|
|
Timberlands, less depletion
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and
timberlands net
|
|
|
$528,867
|
|
|
|
|
$478,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The following table sets forth information with respect to
goodwill and other intangible assets which are recorded in the
caption Other assets in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Composite
Fibers
|
|
|
$15,198
|
|
|
|
|
$10,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
$5,958
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and trademark
|
|
|
4,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles
|
|
|
10,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangibles
|
|
|
$10,325
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Lydney Mill acquisition, we recorded
$3.5 million of goodwill. The balance of the increase in
goodwill was due to foreign currency translation adjustments.
|
|
16.
|
OTHER
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
$31,729
|
|
|
|
|
$18,828
|
|
|
|
Other accrued compensation and
retirement benefits
|
|
|
7,828
|
|
|
|
|
6,320
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
15,480
|
|
|
|
Cross currency rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,370
|
|
|
|
Accrued rebates
|
|
|
17,849
|
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
16,952
|
|
|
|
|
16,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$74,960
|
|
|
|
|
$74,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility, due
April 2011
|
|
|
$64,795
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Term Loan, due April 2011
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility, due June
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
|
|
71/8% Notes,
due May 2016
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67/8% Notes,
due July 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Note payable SunTrust,
due March 2008
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
394,795
|
|
|
|
|
203,650
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(19,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current
portion
|
|
|
$375,295
|
|
|
|
|
$184,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 3, 2006, we, along with certain of our
subsidiaries as borrowers and certain of our subsidiaries as
guarantors, entered into a credit agreement with certain
financial institutions. Pursuant to the credit agreement, we may
borrow, repay and reborrow revolving credit loans in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $200 million
outstanding at any time. All borrowings under our credit
facility are unsecured. The revolving credit commitment expires
on April 2, 2011.
In addition, on April 3, 2006, pursuant to the credit
agreement, we received a term loan in the principal amount of
$100 million. Quarterly repayments of principal outstanding
under the term loan begin on March 31, 2007 with the final
principal payment due on April 2, 2011.
Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest, at our
option, at either (a) the banks base rate described
in the credit agreement as the greater of the prime rate or the
federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, or (b) the
EURO rate based generally on the London Interbank Offer Rate,
plus an applicable margin that varies from 67.5 basis
points to 137.5 basis points according to our corporate
credit rating determined by S&P and Moodys.
We have the right to prepay the term loan and revolving credit
borrowings in whole or in part without premium or penalty,
subject to timing conditions related to the interest rate option
chosen. If certain prepayment events occur, such as a sale of
assets or the incurrence of additional indebtedness in excess of
$10.0 million in the aggregate, we must repay a specified
portion of the term loan within five days of the prepayment
event.
The credit agreement contains a number of customary covenants
for financings of this type that, among other things, restrict
our ability to dispose of or create liens on assets, incur
additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness, create liens
on assets, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or
consolidations. We are also required to comply with specified
financial tests and ratios, each as defined in the credit
agreement, including a consolidated minimum net worth test and a
maximum debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
-40-
GLATFELTER
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio. A
breach of these requirements, of which there were none at
December 31, 2006, would give rise to certain remedies
under the credit agreement, among which are the termination of
the agreement and acceleration of the outstanding borrowings
plus accrued and unpaid interest under the credit facility.
This new credit facility replaced our prior credit facility
which would have matured in June 2006. A portion of the proceeds
from the new credit facility were used to finance the
Chillicothe acquisition.
On April 28, 2006, we completed an offering of
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
71/8% Senior
Notes due 2016. Net proceeds from this offering totaled
approximately $196.4 million, after deducting the
commissions and other fees and expenses relating to the
offering. We primarily used the net proceeds to redeem
$150.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
outstanding
67/8% notes
due July 2007, plus the payment of the applicable redemption
premium and accrued interest.
Interest on these Senior Notes accrues at the rate of
71/8% per
annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and
November 1, commencing on November 1, 2006.
Prior to May 1, 2011, we may redeem all, but not less than
all, of the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, plus a make-whole premium. On or after
May 1, 2011, we may redeem some or all of the notes at
specified redemption prices. In addition, prior to May 1,
2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount
of the notes using the net proceeds from certain equity
offerings.
The
71/8% Senior
Note agreement contains a cross-default clause that
provides if there were to be an event of default under the
credit agreement discussed earlier, we would also be in default
under the
71/8% Senior
Notes.
On March 21, 2003, we sold approximately 25,500 acres
of timberlands and received as consideration a
$37.9 million
10-year
interest bearing note receivable from the timberland buyer. The
note receivable is recorded as Other assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. We pledged this note as
collateral under a $34.0 million promissory note payable to
SunTrust Financial (the Note Payable). The Note
Payable bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.82% for five years
at which time we can elect to renew the obligation.
The following schedule sets forth the maturity of our long-term
debt during the indicated year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$19,500
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
78,295
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees debt obligations of all
its subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these
consolidated financial statements.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had $8.1 million and
$4.3 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued to
us by a financial institution. The letters of credit are for the
benefit of certain state workers compensation insurance agencies
in conjunction with our self-insurance program. No amounts were
outstanding under the letters of credit. We bear the credit risk
on this amount to the extent that we do not comply with the
provisions of certain agreements. Outstanding letters of credit
reduce amounts available under our revolving credit facility.
The following table summarizes outstanding shares of common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of
year
|
|
|
44,132
|
|
|
|
|
43,950
|
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares issued for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock performance awards
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
401(k) plan
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
44,821
|
|
|
|
|
44,132
|
|
|
|
43,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
COMMITMENTS,
CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
Contractual Commitments The following table
summarizes the minimum annual payments due on noncancelable
operating leases and other similar contractual obligations
having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year. Other
contractual obligations primarily represent minimum purchase
commitments under energy and pulp wood supply contracts and
other purchase obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Leases
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
3,539
|
|
|
$
|
45,733
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
12,702
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
5,076
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, required minimum annual payments due
under operating leases and other similar contractual obligations
aggregated $18.7 million and $63.7 million,
respectively.
-41-
GLATFELTER
Ecusta Division Matters At
December 31, 2006, we had reserves for various matters
associated with our former Ecusta Division. Activity in these
reserves during the period indicated is summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ecusta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
Workers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Matters
|
|
|
Comp
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
|
$
|
1,913
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(4,669
|
)
|
|
|
Other Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
7,202
|
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
6,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,144
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
11,835
|
|
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
|
$
|
1,913
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2004
|
|
$
|
7,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
$
|
11,193
|
|
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
6,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,144
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
11,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to the reserves set forth above as of
December 31, 2006, $1.2 million is recorded under the
caption Other current liabilities and
$7.4 million is recorded under the caption Other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
The following discussion provides more details on each of these
matters.
Background Information In August 2001,
pursuant to an acquisition agreement (the Acquisition
Agreement), we sold the assets of our Ecusta Division to
four related entities, consisting of Purico (IOM) Limited, an
Isle of Man limited liability company (Purico), and
RF&Son Inc. (RF), RFS US Inc. (RFS
US) and RFS Ecusta Inc. (RFS Ecusta), each of
which is a Delaware corporation, (collectively, the
Buyers).
In August 2002, the Buyers shut down the manufacturing operation
of the pulp and paper mill in Pisgah Forest, North Carolina,
which was the most significant operation of the Ecusta Division.
On October 23, 2002, RFS Ecusta and RFS US (the
Debtors) separately filed for bankruptcy under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy
cases were later converted to Chapter 7 proceedings. In
accordance with the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement, we
notified the Buyers of third party claims (Third Party
Claims) made against us for which we sought
indemnification from the Buyers. The Third Party Claims
primarily relate to certain environmental matters,
post-retirement benefits, workers compensation claims and
vendor payables.
Effective August 8, 2003, the assets of RFS Ecusta and RFS
US, which substantially consist of the pulp and paper mill and
related real property, were sold to several third parties
unrelated to the Buyers (the New Buyers).
Ecusta Environmental Matters Beginning
in April 2003, government authorities, including the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR), initiated discussions with us and the New
Buyers regarding, among other environmental issues, certain
landfill closure liabilities associated with the Ecusta mill and
its properties. The discussions focused on NCDENRs desire
to establish a plan and secure financial resources to close
three landfills located at the Ecusta facility and to address
other environmental matters at the facility. During the third
quarter of 2003, the discussions ended with NCDENRs
conclusion to hold us responsible for the closure of three
landfills. Accordingly, we established reserves approximating
$7.6 million representing estimated closure costs. In March
2004 and September 2005, the NCDENR issued us separate orders
requiring the closure of two of the three landfills at issue. We
have completed the closure of these two landfills and are in the
process of closing the third.
In October 2004, one of the New Buyers entered into a
Brownfields Agreement with the NCDENR relating to the Ecusta
mill, pursuant to which that New Buyer was to be held
responsible for certain specified environmental concerns.
In September 2005, NCDENR sought our participation, pursuant to
a proposed consent order, in the evaluation and potential
remediation of environmentally hazardous conditions at the
former Ecusta mill site. In January 2006, NCDENR modified its
proposed consent order to include us and the company (the
Prior Owner) from whom our predecessor, Ecusta
Corporation, purchased the Ecusta mill. NCDENR and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) have
indicated that if neither party enters into a consent order EPA
intends to list the mill site on the National Priorities List
and pursue assessment and remediation of the site under the
Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility, Compensation and
Liability Act (more commonly known as Superfund). In
addition to calling for the assessment, closure, and
post-closure monitoring and maintenance of the third landfill
for which we since have been directed to close, the proposed
consent order would impose an obligation to assess and remediate
the following:
|
|
|
|
i.
|
mercury and certain other contamination on and around the site;
|
|
|
ii.
|
potentially hazardous conditions existing in the sediment and
water column of the sites water
|
-42-
GLATFELTER
treatment and aeration and sedimentation basin (the
ASB); and
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
contamination associated with two additional landfills on the
site that were not used by us.
|
With respect to the concerns set forth above (collectively, the
NCDENR matters) we contend that the Prior Owner is
responsible for the mercury contamination; and that the New
Buyers, as owner and operator of the ASB, are responsible for
addressing any issues associated with the ASB, including
closure, and that the New Buyers, in a May 2004 agreement,
expressly agreed to indemnify and hold us harmless from certain
environmental liabilities, which include most, if not all, of
the NCDENR matters. We continue to have discussions with NCDENR
and USEPA concerning our potential responsibilities and
appropriate remedial actions, if any, which may be necessary.
In addition, it is possible the New Buyers may not have
sufficient cash flow to satisfy certain ongoing obligations to
NCDENR and us. Specifically, the New Buyers are obligated
(i) to treat leachate and stormwater runoff from the
landfills, which we are currently required to manage, and
(ii) to pump and treat contaminated groundwater in the
vicinity of a former caustic building at the site. If the New
Buyers should default on these obligations, it is possible that
NCDENR will require us to make appropriate arrangements for
these obligations and to be responsible for the remediation of
certain contamination on and around the site (collectively, the
New Buyers Matters).
As a result of NCDENRs September 2005 communication with
us and our assessment of the range of likely outcomes of the
NCDENR Matters and the New Buyers Matters, our results of
operations for 2005 included a $2.7 million charge to
increase our reserve for estimated costs associated with the
Ecusta environmental matters. The addition to the reserve
includes estimated operating costs associated with the
obligations of the New Buyer discussed above. Estimated costs to
perform an assessment of certain risks posed by the presence of
mercury, further characterization of sediment in the ASB and
treatment of other contamination. Since this initial accrual no
further changes have been made.
The 2005 reserves relating to additional environmental
assessment activities were premised, in part, on the belief that
it might be mutually beneficial to us and NCDENR if we were to
agree to perform the assessment activities, without accepting
responsibility for any subsequently required remediation. While
it now appears clear that NCDENR and EPA will not accept such an
arrangement, it is uncertain what action will be taken by the
agencies in the absence of a consent order (and against whom)
and what remediation, if any, will be required if and when
additional assessments are performed.
In addition, it is unclear how liability for any required
assessment or remediation will be apportioned among the Prior
Owner, Glatfelter, the Buyers and the New Buyers. We are also in
negotiations with potential buyers of the property (the
Potential Buyers) and the New Buyers concerning the
possibility of entering into (i) a consent order with EPA,
the Potential Buyers, and the New Buyers which would allocate
assessment and remediation obligations between us and the
Potential Buyers, and (ii) an agreement with the Potential
Buyers and the New Buyers that would allocate the cost of
performing assessment and remediation activities at the property
between them and us. However, the outcome of these negotiations
is uncertain. For the foregoing reasons, in part, our recorded reserve does not include costs associated with
further remediation activities that we may be required to
perform, the range of which we are currently unable to estimate,
however, they could be significant.
The New Buyers ability to fulfill their obligations to
NCDENR and us, in the absence of sufficient cash flow from their
operations, may be dependent on their ability to complete a sale
of the site.
Notwithstanding a potential sale of the property, and with
respect to alleged mercury contamination at the site,
i) the extent of contamination, if any, is unknown,
ii) it is unclear whether we will be required to remediate
iii) the apportionment of liability amongst us, the Prior
Owner and/or
the New Buyers is unknown; and iv) the ultimate costs to
remedy are not reasonably estimable based on information
currently available to us. Accordingly, no amounts for such
potential actions have been included in our reserve discussed
above. If we are required to complete additional remedial
actions, further charges would be required, and such amounts
could be material.
We are evaluating potential legal claims and defenses we may
have with respect to any other parties including previous owners
of the site and their obligations
and/or cost
recoveries. The Prior Owners of the site have filed a
declaratory judgment in the US District Court asking the
courts to order us to indemnify the Prior Owner for any costs
related to the remediation of mercury contamination. In response
we filed an answer denying that we are responsible for such
costs and a counterclaim against the Prior Owner alleging, among
others things, fraud and negligent
-43-
GLATFELTER
misrepresentation by the Prior Owner regarding mercury
contamination.
Separately, we are evaluating options presented to us by
potential buyers of the property, including offers for us to
contribute monetarily to the cost to remediate
on-site
contamination. To date we believe we are adequately reserved to
accomplish such an alternative, however, there are no assurances
the regulators will accept such a proposal. We are also
evaluating options for ensuring that the New Buyers fulfill
their obligations with respect to the New Buyers Matters. We are
uncertain as to what additional Ecusta-related claims,
including, among others, environmental matters, government
oversight
and/or
government past costs, if any, may be asserted against us.
Workers Compensation Prior to
2003, we established reserves related to potential workers
compensation claims associated with the former Ecusta Division,
which at that time were estimated to total approximately
$2.2 million. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the North
Carolina courts issued a ruling that held us liable for
workers compensation claims of certain employees that were
injured during their employment at the Ecusta facility prior to
our sale of the Division. Since this ruling, we have made
payments as indicated in the reserve analysis presented earlier
in this Note 19.
Other In October 2004, the bankruptcy
trustee for the estates of RFS Ecusta and RFS US filed a
complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of North Carolina against certain of the Buyers and
other related parties (Defendant Buyers) and us. The
complaint alleged, among other things, that the Defendant Buyers
engaged in fraud and fraudulent transfers and breached their
fiduciary duties. With respect to Glatfelter, the complaint
alleged that we aided and abetted the Defendant Buyers in their
purported actions in the structuring of the acquisition of the
Ecusta Division and asserts a claim against us under the
Bankruptcy Code. The trustee sought damages from us in an amount
not less than $25.8 million, plus interest, and other
relief.
The bankruptcy trustee filed another complaint, also in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North
Carolina, against us, certain banks and other parties, seeking,
among other things, damages totaling $6.5 million for
alleged breaches of the Acquisition Agreement (the Breach
Claims), release of certain amounts held in escrow
totaling $3.5 million (the Escrow Claims) and
recoveries of unspecified amounts allegedly payable under the
Acquisition Agreement and a related agreement. We have
previously reserved such escrowed amounts and they were recorded
in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as
Other long-term liabilities.
All of the bankruptcy trustees actions against us were
settled pursuant to an agreement approved by the United States
District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on
September 8, 2006. Under the terms of the settlement, the
trustee received approximately $3.1 million of the amounts
previously held in escrow and for which we had previously
reserved. The trustee also retained a $1.6 million
certificate of deposit that one of the Debtors had posted with
the State of North Carolina to insure certain workers
compensation obligations. As part of the settlement, we assigned
any claims we may have had against the Defendant Buyers to the
trustee and will receive a percentage of the trustees
recovery from such parties, if any.
Fox River Neenah, Wisconsin We
have previously reported with respect to potential environmental
claims arising out of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) in sediments in the lower Fox River and in
the Bay of Green Bay, downstream of our Neenah, Wisconsin
facility. We acquired the Neenah facility in 1979 as part of the
acquisition of the Bergstrom Paper Company. In part, this
facility used wastepaper as a source of fiber. At no time did
the Neenah facility utilize PCBs in the pulp and paper making
process, but discharges from the facility containing PCBs from
wastepaper may have occurred from 1954 to the late 1970s. Any
PCBs that the Neenah facility discharged into the Fox River
resulted from the presence of PCBs in
NCR®-brand
carbonless copy paper in the wastepaper that was received from
others and recycled.
As described below, various state and federal governmental
agencies have formally notified nine potentially responsible
parties (PRPs), including us, that they are
potentially responsible for response costs and natural
resource damages (NRDs) arising from PCB
contamination in the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green
Bay, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and other
statutes. The other identified PRPs are NCR Corporation,
Appleton Paper Inc., Georgia Pacific Corp. (formerly
Fort Howard Corp. and Fort James), WTM I Company
(WTM I, a subsidiary of Chesapeake Corp.), Riverside
Paper Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills Corp. (a subsidiary of
Sonoco Products Company), Sonoco Products Company, and Menasha
Corporation.
CERCLA establishes a two-part liability structure that makes
responsible parties liable for (1) response
costs associated with the remediation of a release of
hazardous substances and (2) NRDs related to that
-44-
GLATFELTER
release. Courts have interpreted CERCLA to impose joint and
several liabilities on responsible parties for response costs,
subject to equitable allocation in certain instances. Prior to a
final settlement by all responsible parties and the final
cleanup of the contamination, uncertainty regarding the
application of such liability will persist.
The areas of the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay in
which PCB contamination exists are commonly referred to as
Operable Unit 1 (OU1), which consists of Little Lake
Butte des Morts, the portion of the river that is closest to our
Neenah facility, Operable Unit 2 (OU2), which is the
portion of the river between dams at Appleton and Little Rapids,
and Operable Units 3 through 5 (OU35), an area
approximately 20 miles downstream of our Neenah facility.
The following summarizes the status of our potential exposure:
Response
Actions
OU1 and OU2 On January 7, 2003, the
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (the Wisconsin
DNR) and the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) issued a Record of Decision (ROD)
for the cleanup of OU1 and OU2. Subject to extenuating
circumstances and alternative solutions provided for in the ROD,
the ROD requires the removal of approximately 784,000 cubic
yards of sediment from OU1 and no active remediation of OU2. The
ROD also requires the monitoring of the two operable units. On
July 1, 2003, WTM I Company entered into an Administrative
Order on Consent (AOC) with EPA and the Wisconsin
DNR regarding the implementation of the Remedial Design for OU1.
In the first quarter of 2004, the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Wisconsin approved a consent decree
regarding OU1 (the OU1 Consent Decree). Under terms
of the OU1 Consent Decree, Glatfelter and WTM I Company each
agreed to pay approximately $27 million, of which
$25.0 million from each was placed in escrow to fund
response work associated with remedial actions specified in the
ROD. The remaining amount that the parties agreed to pay under
the Consent Decree includes payments for NRD, and NRD assessment
and other past costs incurred by the governments. In addition,
EPA agreed to take steps to place $10 million from another
source into escrow for the OU1 cleanup, all of which has been
received.
The terms of the OU1 Consent Decree and the underlying escrow
agreement restrict the use of the funds to qualifying
remediation activities or restoration activities at the lower
Fox River site. The response work is being managed
and/or
performed by Glatfelter and WTM I, with governmental
oversight, and funded by the amounts placed in escrow. Beginning
in mid 2004, Glatfelter and WTM I have performed activities to
remediate OU1, including, among others, construction of
de-watering and water-treatment facilities, dredging of portions
of OU1, dewatering of the dredged materials, and hauling of the
dewatered sediment to an authorized disposal facility. Since the
start of these activities, approximately 200,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sediment has been dredged.
The terms of the OU1 Consent Decree include provisions to be
followed should the escrow account be depleted prior to
completion of the response work. In this event, each company
would be notified and be provided an opportunity to contribute
additional funds to the escrow account and to extend the
remediation effort. Should the OU1 Consent Decree be terminated
due to insufficient funds, each company would lose the
protections contained in the settlement and the governments may
turn to one or both parties for the completion of OU1 clean up.
In such a situation, the governments may also seek response work
from a third party, or perform the work themselves and seek
response costs from any or all PRPs for the site, including
Glatfelter. Based on information currently available to us,
subject to i) government approval of the use of alternative
remedies as proposed by us and WTM I; ii) the successful
negotiation of acceptable and cost-effective contracts to
complete the proposed remediation activities; and
iii) effective implementation of the chosen technologies by
the remediation contractor, and together with anticipated
earnings on the funds currently on deposit in the escrow account
and other assets available, we believe the required remedial
actions can be completed for amounts reserved. If the Consent
Decree is terminated due to the insufficiency of the escrow
funds, Glatfelter and WTM I each remain potentially responsible
for the costs necessary to complete the remedial action.
Based on the remediation activities completed to date, contract
proposals received for the remaining remediation work, and the
availability of potential alternative remedies under the ROD, we
believe the total remediation of OU1 will cost between
$68 million and $137 million.
In late 2006, Glatfelter and WTM I jointly submitted a final
closure plan to Wisconsin DNR and EPA. The final closure plan
proposes the use of alternative remedies that, if accepted as
proposed, could be completed for amounts currently in escrow,
future earnings on the fund and other assets available.
-45-
GLATFELTER
The agencies have issued comments on our plan including requests
for additional data related to a number of technical components
of the closure plan. Further, the agencies have expressed their
concern that the cost of the ultimately accepted closure plan
may exceed the balance of the escrow fund and an expression of
interest in obtaining financial assurances that, in the event
the ultimate closure plan should exceed financial resources
currently allocated to the remedy, adequate funds would be
readily available. In addition, the agencies indicated that in
the absence of such assurance, they may issue a notice of
potential Insufficiency Determination under the Consent Decree.
Negotiations to address the agencies concerns have
recently begun. The governments willingness to accept the
plan is uncertain and any changes required to it would likely
necessitate an increase to our reserves. Any such changes would
require additional cash to be contributed and such amounts could
be material.
As of December 31, 2006, our portion of the escrow account
totaled approximately $6.6 million, of which
$4.5 million is recorded in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheet under the caption Prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $2.1 million is included under the
caption Other assets. As of December 31, 2006,
our reserve for environmental liabilities, all of which is for
OU1 remediation activities, totaled $7.7 million.
OUs 3 5 On July 28, 2003, the
EPA and the Wisconsin DNR issued a ROD (the Second
ROD) for the cleanup of OU3 5. The Second ROD
calls for the removal of 6.5 million cubic yards of
sediment and certain monitoring at an estimated cost of
$324.4 million but could, according to the Second ROD, cost
within a range from approximately $227.0 million to
$486.6 million. The most significant component of the
estimated costs is attributable to large-scale sediment removal
by dredging.
During the first quarter of 2004, NCR Corp. and Georgia Pacific
Corp. entered into an AOC with the United States EPA under which
they agreed to perform the Remedial Design for OUs 3-5, thereby
accomplishing a first step towards remediation.
In February 2007, we, along with the other PRPs involved in the
OU2 and OU3 5 matters, received a General Notice
Letter from the EPA demanding that each PRP advise the EPA of
their intentions to enter into settlement negotiations in March
2007 with a good faith offer to settle due by April 1, 2007.
We do not believe that we have more than a de minimis
share of any equitable distribution of responsibility for
OU3 5 after taking into account the location of our
Neenah facility relative to the site and considering other work
or funds committed or expended by us. However, uncertainty
regarding responsibilities for the cleanup of these sites
continues due to disagreement over a fair allocation or
apportionment of responsibility. If we are ordered to complete
more than what we believe to be our fair share of any
remediation efforts, the costs to do so would be significant.
Natural Resource Damages The ROD and Second
ROD do not place any value on claims for NRDs associated with
this matter. As noted above, NRD claims are distinct from costs
related to the primary remediation of a Superfund site.
Calculating the value of NRD claims is difficult, especially in
the absence of a completed remedy for the underlying
contamination. The State of Wisconsin, the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), four Indian
tribes and the Michigan Attorney General have asserted that they
possess NRD claims related to the lower Fox River and the Bay of
Green Bay.
In September 1994, FWS notified the then- identified PRPs that
it considered them potentially responsible for NRDs. The
federal, tribal and Michigan agencies claiming to be NRD
trustees have proceeded with the preparation of an NRD
assessment. While the final assessment has yet to be completed,
the federal trustees released a plan on October 25, 2000
that values NRDs for injured natural resources that allegedly
fall under their trusteeship between $176 million and
$333 million. We believe that the federal NRD assessment is
technically and procedurally flawed. We also believe that the
NRD claims alleged by the various alleged trustees are legally
and factually without merit.
The OU1 Consent Decree required that Glatfelter and WTM I each
pay the governments $1.5 million for NRDs for the Fox River
site, and $150,000 for NRD assessment costs. Each of these
payments was made in return for credit to be applied toward each
settling companys potential liability for NRDs associated
with the Fox River site.
Other Information The Wisconsin DNR and FWS
have each published studies, the latter in draft form,
estimating the amount of PCBs discharged by each identified PRP
to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay. These reports
estimate our Neenah facilitys share of the volumetric
discharge to be as high as 27%. We do not believe the volumetric
estimates used in these studies are accurate because
(a) the studies themselves disclose that they are not
accurate and (b) the volumetric estimates contained in the
studies are based on
-46-
GLATFELTER
assumptions that are unsupported by existing evidence. We
believe that our volumetric contribution is significantly lower
than the estimates set forth in these studies. Further, we do
not believe that a volumetric allocation would constitute an
equitable distribution of the potential liability for the
contamination. Other factors, such as the location of
contamination, the location of discharge and a partys role
in causing discharge must be considered in order for the
allocation to be equitable.
We have entered into interim cost-sharing agreements with four
of the other PRPs, pursuant to which such PRPs have agreed to
share both defense costs and costs for scientific studies
relating to PCBs discharged into the lower Fox River. These
interim cost-sharing agreements have no bearing on the final
allocation of costs related to this matter. Based upon our
evaluation of the magnitude, nature and location of the various
discharges of PCBs to the river and the relationship of those
discharges to identified contamination, we believe our share of
any liability among the identified PRPs is much less than our
per capita share of the cost sharing agreement.
We also believe that there exist additional potentially
responsible parties other than the identified PRPs. For
instance, certain of the identified PRPs discharged their
wastewater through public wastewater treatment facilities, which
we believe makes the owners of such facilities potentially
responsible in this matter. We also believe that entities
providing wastepaper-containing PCBs to each of the recycling
mills are also potentially responsible for this matter.
While the OU1 Consent Decree provides a negotiated framework for
resolving both ours and WTM I liability for the costs for
completing the remediation of OU1, it does not completely
resolve our potential liability related to the Fox River. We
anticipate this matter may result in litigation, but cannot
predict the timing, nature, extent or magnitude of such
litigation. We currently are unable to predict our ultimate cost
related to this matter.
Reserves
for Fox River Environmental Liabilities
We have reserves for existing environmental liabilities and for
those environmental matters for which it is probable that a
claim will be made and for which the amount of the obligation is
reasonably estimable. The following table summarizes information
with respect to such reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Recorded as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
$7.6
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
The classification of our environmental liabilities is based on
the development of the underlying Fox River OU1 remediation plan
and execution of the related escrow agreement for the funding
thereof. The reserve balance declined as a result of payments
associated with remediation activities under the OU1 Consent
Decree and items related to the Fox River matter. We did not
record charges associated with the Fox River matter to our
results of operations during the past three years.
Other than with respect to the OU1 Consent Decree, the amount
and timing of future expenditures for environmental compliance,
cleanup, remediation and personal injury, NRDs and property
damage liabilities cannot be ascertained with any certainty due
to, among other things, the unknown extent and nature of any
contamination, the extent and timing of any technological
advances for pollution abatement, the response actions that may
be required, the availability of qualified remediation
contractors, equipment, and landfill space, and the number and
financial resources of any other PRPs.
Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes Based on
currently available information, including actual remediation
costs incurred to date, we believe that the remediation of OU1
can be satisfactorily completed for the amounts provided under
the OU1 Consent Decree. Our assessment is dependent, in part, on
government approval of the use of alternative remedies in OU1 as
proposed by us and WTM I, on the successful negotiation of
acceptable contracts to complete remediation activities, and an
effective implementation of the chosen technologies by the
remediation contractor. However, if we are unsuccessful in
managing our costs to implement the ROD or if alternative
remedies are not accepted by government authorities, additional
charges may be necessary and such amounts could be material.
The OU1 Consent Decree does not address response costs necessary
to remediate the remainder of the Fox River site and only
addresses NRDs and claims for reimbursement of government
expenses to a limited extent. Due to judicial interpretations
that find CERCLA imposes joint and several liability,
uncertainty persists regarding our exposure with respect to the
remainder of the Fox River site.
Based on our analysis of currently available information and
experience regarding the cleanup of
-47-
GLATFELTER
hazardous substances, we believe that it is reasonably possible
that our costs associated with the lower Fox River and the Bay
of Green Bay may exceed our original reserves by amounts that
may prove to be insignificant or that could range, in the
aggregate, up to approximately $150 million, over a period
that is undeterminable but that could range beyond
20 years. We believe that the likelihood of an outcome in
the upper end of the monetary range is significantly less than
other possible outcomes within the range and that the
possibility of an outcome in excess of the upper end of the
monetary range is remote.
In our estimate of the upper end of the range, we have
considered: (i) the remedial actions agreed to in the OU1
Consent Decree and our belief that the required work can be
accomplished with the funds to be escrowed under the OU1 Consent
Decree; and (ii) no active remediation of OU2. We have also
assumed dredging for the remainder of the Fox River site as set
forth in the Second ROD, although at a significantly higher cost
than estimated in the Second ROD. We have also assumed our share
of the ultimate liability to be 18%, which is significantly
higher than we believe is appropriate or than we will incur, and
a level of NRD claims and claims for reimbursement of expenses
from other parties that, although reasonably possible, is
unlikely.
In estimating both our current reserves for environmental
remediation and other environmental liabilities and the possible
range of additional costs, we have assumed that we will not bear
the entire cost of remediation and damages to the exclusion of
other known PRPs who may be jointly and severally liable. The
ability of other PRPs to participate has been taken into
account, generally based on their financial condition and
probable contribution. Our evaluation of the other PRPs
financial condition included the review of publicly available
financial information. Furthermore, we believe certain of these
PRPs have corporate or contractual relationships with additional
entities that may shift to those entities some or all of the
monetary obligations arising from the Fox River site. The
relative probable contribution is based upon our knowledge that
at least two PRPs manufactured the paper, and arranged for the
disposal of the wastepaper, that included the PCBs and
consequently, in our opinion, bear a higher level of
responsibility.
In addition, our assessment is based upon the magnitude, nature
and location of the various discharges of PCBs to the river and
the relationship of those discharges to identified
contamination. We continue to evaluate our exposure and the
level of our reserves, including, but not limited to, our
potential share of the costs and NRDs, if any, associated with
the Fox River site.
Summary Our current assessment is that we
should be able to manage these environmental matters without a
long-term, material adverse impact on the Company. These matters
could, however, at any particular time or for any particular
year or years, have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, liquidity
and/or
results of operations or could result in a default under our
loan covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our
reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations
related to these matters, that our share of costs
and/or
damages for these matters will not exceed our available
resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term,
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations. With regard to the Fox River
site, if we are not successful in managing the implementation of
the OU1 Consent Decree
and/or if we
are ordered to implement the remedy proposed in the Second ROD,
such developments could have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of
operations and may result in a default under our loan covenants.
In addition to the specific matters discussed above, we are
subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation by
various federal, state, local and foreign governments with
respect to the environmental impact of our mills. To comply with
environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred substantial
capital and operating expenditures in past years. We anticipate
that environmental regulation of our operations will continue to
become more burdensome and that capital and operating
expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations
will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. In addition,
we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate the adverse
effects, if any, on the environment resulting from our
operations, including the restoration of natural resources and
liability for personal injury and for damages to property and
natural resources.
We are also involved in other lawsuits that are ordinary and
incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of these
lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we do not
expect that such lawsuits in the aggregate or individually will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, liquidity or results of operations.
-48-
GLATFELTER
|
|
20.
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
|
The following table sets forth profitability and other
information by business unit for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
Other and Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$693,660
|
|
|
|
|
$380,923
|
|
|
|
$337,436
|
|
|
|
$292,751
|
|
|
|
|
$198,137
|
|
|
|
$205,232
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
$856
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
$543,524
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
704,386
|
|
|
|
|
391,001
|
|
|
|
347,389
|
|
|
|
292,751
|
|
|
|
|
198,137
|
|
|
|
205,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
635,143
|
|
|
|
|
340,629
|
|
|
|
312,136
|
|
|
|
246,797
|
|
|
|
|
166,153
|
|
|
|
163,843
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
|
|
(14,916
|
)
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
461,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
69,243
|
|
|
|
|
50,372
|
|
|
|
35,253
|
|
|
|
45,954
|
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
41,389
|
|
|
|
(9,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
15,772
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
|
50,285
|
|
|
|
|
39,876
|
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
28,458
|
|
|
|
|
21,282
|
|
|
|
23,067
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
59,939
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
18,958
|
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
17,496
|
|
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
18,322
|
|
|
|
(36,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
48,985
|
|
|
|
86,436
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
103,394
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
(12,631
|
)
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
(12,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
$18,958
|
|
|
|
|
$10,496
|
|
|
|
$(1,364
|
)
|
|
|
$17,496
|
|
|
|
|
$10,702
|
|
|
|
$18,322
|
|
|
|
$(58,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
$38,942
|
|
|
|
$73,805
|
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
$90,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands,
net
|
|
|
$315,556
|
|
|
|
|
$335,745
|
|
|
|
$351,086
|
|
|
|
$213,311
|
|
|
|
|
$143,083
|
|
|
|
$169,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$528,867
|
|
|
|
|
$478,828
|
|
|
|
$520,412
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
36,484
|
|
|
|
|
21,413
|
|
|
|
11,970
|
|
|
|
7,976
|
|
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
|
6,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,460
|
|
|
|
|
31,024
|
|
|
|
18,587
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
32,824
|
|
|
|
|
35,781
|
|
|
|
37,186
|
|
|
|
17,197
|
|
|
|
|
14,866
|
|
|
|
14,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
|
50,647
|
|
|
|
51,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our North America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses
on papers for the production of high-quality hardbound books and
other book publishing needs, carbonless papers designed for
multiple end-uses, such as credit card receipts, forms and other
applications, envelope & converting markets and highly
technical customized products for the digital imaging, casting
and release, pressure sensitive, and several niche technical
specialty markets.
Composite Fibers, based in Gernsbach, Germany, focuses on
higher-value-added products, such as paper for tea bags and
coffee pods/pads and filters, decorative laminates used for
furniture and flooring, and metallized products used in the
labeling of beer bottles.
Results of individual business units are presented based on our
management accounting practices and management structure. There
is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for
management accounting equivalent to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore,
the financial results of individual business units are not
necessarily comparable with similar information for any other
company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and
allocations to measure performance of the business units.
Methodologies are refined from time to time as management
accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The
costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the
business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated
utilization of support area services.
Management evaluates results of operations before non-cash
pension income, restructuring related charges, unusual items,
acquisition integration costs, effects of asset dispositions and
insurance recoveries because it believes this is a more
meaningful representation of the operating performance of its
core papermaking businesses, the profitability of business units
and the extent of cash flow generated from core operations. This
presentation is closely aligned with the management and
operating structure of our company. It is also on this basis
that Companys performance is evaluated internally and by
the Companys Board of Directors.
We sell a significant portion of our specialty papers through
wholesale paper merchants. No individual customer accounted for
more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in 2006, 2005 or
2004.
Our net sales to external customers and location of net plant,
equipment and timberlands are summarized below. Net sales are
attributed to countries based upon origin of shipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant,
|
|
|
|
|
Plant,
|
|
|
|
Plant,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Timberlands Net
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Timberlands Net
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Timberlands Net
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
719,720
|
|
|
$
|
315,556
|
|
|
|
$
|
399,705
|
|
|
$
|
335,745
|
|
|
$
|
353,284
|
|
|
$
|
351,086
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
173,267
|
|
|
|
128,290
|
|
|
|
|
143,227
|
|
|
|
123,685
|
|
|
|
156,337
|
|
|
|
149,513
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
60,115
|
|
|
|
63,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
33,309
|
|
|
|
21,960
|
|
|
|
|
36,189
|
|
|
|
19,398
|
|
|
|
33,903
|
|
|
|
19,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
$
|
528,867
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
$
|
478,828
|
|
|
$
|
543,524
|
|
|
$
|
520,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
-49-
GLATFELTER
|
|
21.
|
GUARANTOR
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Our
71/8% Senior
Notes have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint
and several basis, by certain of our 100%-owned domestic
subsidiaries, PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., The
Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company, GLT International Finance, LLC,
Glenn-Wolfe, Inc., Glatfelter Holdings, LLC and Glatfelter
Holdings II, LLC.
The following presents our consolidating statements of income
and cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004 and our consolidating balance sheets as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005. These financial statements
reflect P. H. Glatfelter Company (the parent), the guarantor
subsidiaries (on a combined basis), the non-guarantor
subsidiaries (on a combined basis) and elimination entries
necessary to combine such entities on a consolidated basis.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
693,661
|
|
|
$
|
36,432
|
|
|
$
|
292,750
|
|
|
$
|
(36,432
|
)
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
704,387
|
|
|
|
36,432
|
|
|
|
292,750
|
|
|
|
(36,432
|
)
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
647,877
|
|
|
|
33,340
|
|
|
|
247,041
|
|
|
|
(36,415
|
)
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
56,510
|
|
|
|
3,092
|
|
|
|
45,709
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
60,119
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
29,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
29,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
(15,960
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(30,716
|
)
|
|
|
16,551
|
|
|
|
14,276
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(20,942
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(3,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,453
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
net
|
|
|
12,453
|
|
|
|
53,273
|
|
|
|
(5,477
|
)
|
|
|
(58,118
|
)
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(8,489
|
)
|
|
|
52,810
|
|
|
|
(8,525
|
)
|
|
|
(58,118
|
)
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(39,205
|
)
|
|
|
69,361
|
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
(58,135
|
)
|
|
|
(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(26,969
|
)
|
|
|
24,776
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
(9,707
|
)
|
|
|
(9,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
44,585
|
|
|
$
|
3,843
|
|
|
$
|
(48,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
380,906
|
|
|
$
|
34,334
|
|
|
$
|
198,254
|
|
|
$
|
(34,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
390,984
|
|
|
|
34,334
|
|
|
|
198,254
|
|
|
|
(34,373
|
)
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
326,433
|
|
|
|
33,101
|
|
|
|
167,157
|
|
|
|
(34,668
|
)
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
64,551
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
31,097
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
44,381
|
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
|
|
21,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
(21,213
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
41,202
|
|
|
|
20,648
|
|
|
|
8,038
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,083
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
net
|
|
|
4,957
|
|
|
|
41,773
|
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
|
(42,360
|
)
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(5,773
|
)
|
|
|
41,773
|
|
|
|
(3,683
|
)
|
|
|
(42,360
|
)
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
35,429
|
|
|
|
62,421
|
|
|
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
(42,065
|
)
|
|
|
60,140
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(3,180
|
)
|
|
|
23,695
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
(792
|
)
|
|
|
21,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
38,609
|
|
|
$
|
38,726
|
|
|
$
|
2,547
|
|
|
$
|
(41,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-50-
GLATFELTER
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$337,416
|
|
|
|
$33,798
|
|
|
|
$206,203
|
|
|
|
$(33,893
|
)
|
|
|
$543,524
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
347,369
|
|
|
|
33,798
|
|
|
|
206,203
|
|
|
|
(33,893
|
)
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
299,150
|
|
|
|
30,116
|
|
|
|
165,151
|
|
|
|
(33,354
|
)
|
|
|
461,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
48,219
|
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
|
|
41,052
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
92,414
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
34,492
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
24,154
|
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
59,939
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
19,704
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
20,375
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
(3,356
|
)
|
|
|
(55,630
|
)
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,509
|
)
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
30,164
|
|
|
|
56,460
|
|
|
|
16,420
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
103,394
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10,875
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,385
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
net
|
|
|
31,074
|
|
|
|
33,364
|
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
(62,306
|
)
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
20,199
|
|
|
|
33,364
|
|
|
|
(3,888
|
)
|
|
|
(62,306
|
)
|
|
|
(12,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
50,363
|
|
|
|
89,824
|
|
|
|
12,532
|
|
|
|
(61,956
|
)
|
|
|
90,763
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(5,739
|
)
|
|
|
34,715
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
34,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$56,102
|
|
|
|
$55,109
|
|
|
|
$6,219
|
|
|
|
$(61,328
|
)
|
|
|
$56,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$10,098
|
|
|
|
$675
|
|
|
|
$11,212
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
233,688
|
|
|
|
11,837
|
|
|
|
114,983
|
|
|
|
(7,455
|
)
|
|
|
353,053
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and
timberlands net
|
|
|
302,606
|
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
213,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,867
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,275,240
|
|
|
|
1,004,992
|
|
|
|
(153,452
|
)
|
|
|
(1,805,042
|
)
|
|
|
321,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$1,821,632
|
|
|
|
$1,030,449
|
|
|
|
$186,059
|
|
|
|
$(1,812,497
|
)
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
$156,679
|
|
|
|
$2,753
|
|
|
|
$36,375
|
|
|
|
$(2,517
|
)
|
|
|
$193,290
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
329,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,295
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
142,394
|
|
|
|
18,112
|
|
|
|
29,472
|
|
|
|
(7,319
|
)
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
804,675
|
|
|
|
91,418
|
|
|
|
25,844
|
|
|
|
(835,906
|
)
|
|
|
86,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,433,264
|
|
|
|
112,283
|
|
|
|
137,470
|
|
|
|
(845,742
|
)
|
|
|
837,275
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
918,166
|
|
|
|
48,589
|
|
|
|
(966,755
|
)
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
|
$1,821,632
|
|
|
|
$1,030,449
|
|
|
|
$186,059
|
|
|
|
$(1,812,497
|
)
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-51-
GLATFELTER
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$14,404
|
|
|
|
$30,615
|
|
|
|
$12,390
|
|
|
|
$33
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
90,964
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
76,118
|
|
|
|
(2,903
|
)
|
|
|
166,115
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and
timberlands net
|
|
|
322,208
|
|
|
|
13,537
|
|
|
|
143,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,828
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,065,934
|
|
|
|
746,701
|
|
|
|
14,677
|
|
|
|
(1,484,720
|
)
|
|
|
342,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$1,493,510
|
|
|
|
$792,789
|
|
|
|
$246,268
|
|
|
|
$(1,487,590
|
)
|
|
|
$1,044,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
$75,465
|
|
|
|
$2,772
|
|
|
|
$61,629
|
|
|
|
$12
|
|
|
|
$139,878
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,000
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
174,854
|
|
|
|
10,585
|
|
|
|
24,003
|
|
|
|
(3,173
|
)
|
|
|
206,269
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
660,879
|
|
|
|
36,581
|
|
|
|
85,441
|
|
|
|
(700,383
|
)
|
|
|
82,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,061,198
|
|
|
|
49,938
|
|
|
|
205,073
|
|
|
|
(703,544
|
)
|
|
|
612,665
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
|
|
742,851
|
|
|
|
41,195
|
|
|
|
(784,046
|
)
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity
|
|
|
$1,493,510
|
|
|
|
$792,789
|
|
|
|
$246,268
|
|
|
|
$(1,487,590
|
)
|
|
|
$1,044,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$(75,477
|
)
|
|
|
$23,804
|
|
|
|
$13,860
|
|
|
|
$9,386
|
|
|
|
$(28,427
|
)
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and
timberlands
|
|
|
(35,527
|
)
|
|
|
(957
|
)
|
|
|
(7,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,460
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
|
|
16,436
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,071
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Lydney mill and
Chillicothe
|
|
|
(89,217
|
)
|
|
|
(69,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investing activities
|
|
|
(120,112
|
)
|
|
|
(53,746
|
)
|
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,831
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from
indebtedness
|
|
|
199,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,476
|
)
|
|
|
(9,419
|
)
|
|
|
181,121
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing activities
|
|
|
191,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,476
|
)
|
|
|
(9,419
|
)
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash
|
|
|
(4,306
|
)
|
|
|
(29,940
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(35,457
|
)
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
14,404
|
|
|
|
30,615
|
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
57,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of period
|
|
|
$10,098
|
|
|
|
$675
|
|
|
|
$11,212
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-52-
GLATFELTER
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$28,694
|
|
|
|
$42,318
|
|
|
|
$(12,497
|
)
|
|
|
$(15,647
|
)
|
|
|
$42,868
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and
timberlands
|
|
|
(20,319
|
)
|
|
|
(1,094
|
)
|
|
|
(9,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,024
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
21,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary,
net of cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investing activities
|
|
|
(20,264
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
12,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,029
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from
indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
|
|
(12,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,001
|
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing activities
|
|
|
(14,425
|
)
|
|
|
(12,001
|
)
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
15,421
|
|
|
|
(15,158
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(5,995
|
)
|
|
|
30,203
|
|
|
|
(6,491
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
20,399
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
18,881
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
39,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of period
|
|
|
$14,404
|
|
|
|
$30,615
|
|
|
|
$12,390
|
|
|
|
$33
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$73,396
|
|
|
|
$(5,540
|
)
|
|
|
$25,630
|
|
|
|
$(53,902
|
)
|
|
|
$39,584
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and
timberlands
|
|
|
(10,847
|
)
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
(6,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,587
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal plant,
equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
3,826
|
|
|
|
56,121
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,171
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary,
net of cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investing activities
|
|
|
(7,021
|
)
|
|
|
54,998
|
|
|
|
(5,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,109
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from
indebtedness
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,049
|
)
|
|
|
(1,839
|
)
|
|
|
(44,888
|
)
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(15,782
|
)
|
|
|
(56,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
(15,782
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options
exercised
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing activities
|
|
|
(44,865
|
)
|
|
|
(56,000
|
)
|
|
|
(13,049
|
)
|
|
|
54,161
|
|
|
|
(59,753
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
21,510
|
|
|
|
(6,542
|
)
|
|
|
9,158
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
24,385
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
(1,111
|
)
|
|
|
6,954
|
|
|
|
9,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of period
|
|
|
$20,399
|
|
|
|
$412
|
|
|
|
$18,881
|
|
|
|
$259
|
|
|
|
$39,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-53-
GLATFELTER
|
|
22.
|
QUARTERLY
RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
Earnings (loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
160,606
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,896
|
|
|
$
|
20,265
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,594
|
|
|
$
|
(11,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
$6,290
|
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
279,720
|
|
|
|
|
145,283
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
|
19,833
|
|
|
|
(20,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
277,489
|
|
|
|
|
146,780
|
|
|
|
37,903
|
|
|
|
|
25,616
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
268,596
|
|
|
|
|
143,162
|
|
|
|
41,393
|
|
|
|
|
23,133
|
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
|
26,947
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information set forth above includes the following, on an
after-tax basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
|
Gains on Sales of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands, and
Other Asset Sales
|
|
Insurance Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
(17,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
(14,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
8,576
|
|
|
|
|
11,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer,
after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)),
as of December 31, 2006, have concluded that, as of the
evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.
Managements report on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
and the related report of our independent registered public
accounting firm are included in Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
On March 13, 2006, we completed the acquisition of the
Lydney mill from J R Crompton Limited and on April 3, 2006,
we completed the acquisition of Chillicothe, the carbonless
paper operation of NewPage Corporation. We performed due
diligence procedures associated with these acquisitions.
Subsequent to closing the acquisitions much of the financial
accounting functions were completed pursuant to third party
servicing agreements between us and the sellers. Beginning in
the third quarter of 2006, we assumed more complete control for
all financial accounting functions related to the acquired
operations. We are in the process of more fully integrating the
respective financial reporting processes and the related
internal controls applicable to these newly acquired entities.
In addition, effective October 1, 2006, we completed the
outsourcing of our domestic payroll processing system to a
nationally recognized payroll services provider. As part of our
evaluation of the related internal controls, we obtained a
Service Auditors report prepared in accordance with Statement on
Auditing Standard No. 70. There were no other changes in
our internal control over financial reporting during the year
ended December 31, 2006, that have materially affected or
is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Directors The information with respect
to directors required under this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March
21, 2007. Our board of directors has determined that, based on
the relevant experience of the members of the Audit Committee,
the members are audit committee financial experts as this
term is set forth in the applicable regulations of the SEC.
Executive Officers of the
Registrant The information with respect to
the executive officers required under this Item is set forth in
Part I of this report.
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior
Financial Officers in compliance with applicable rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that applies to our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and our principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. A copy of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct is
filed as
-54-
GLATFELTER
an exhibit to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and is available on our website, free of charge, at
www.glatfelter.com.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2007.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2007.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2007.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2007.
Our Chief Executive Officer has certified to the New York Stock
Exchange that he is to aware of any violations by the Company of
the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
-55-
GLATFELTER
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBIT AND,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Consolidated Financial
Statements as follows are included in Part II, Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i.
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income
for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv.
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v.
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules
(Consolidated) are included in Part IV:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i.
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts For Each of the Three Years
in the Period Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Documents
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
(Filing)
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated
February 21, 2006, among NewPage Corporation, Chillicothe
Paper Inc. and P. H. Glatfelter Company
|
|
2.1
|
|
February 21, 2006
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Agreement for Sale of Assets
(Lydney), dated March 8, 2006, by and among J R Crompton
Limited, Nicholas James Dargan and William Kenneth Dawson, as
administrators and Glatfelter-UK Limited and the Company
|
|
10
|
|
March 31, 2006
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
April 27, 1977, including restated Articles of
Incorporation, as amended by:
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i
|
.
|
|
Articles of Merger dated
January 30, 1979
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated May 12, 1980
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated September 23, 1981
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated August 2, 1982
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated July 29, 1983
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vi
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
April 25, 1984
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1994
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated October 15, 1984
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1984
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
viii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated December 24, 1985
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1985
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ix
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
April 23, 1986
|
|
(3)
|
|
March 31, 1986
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated July 11, 1986
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1986
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xi
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated March 25, 1988
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1987
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated November 9, 1988
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1988
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xiii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of
Authorized Shares dated April 24, 1989
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1989
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xiv
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
November 29, 1990
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1990
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xv
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
June 26, 1991
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1991
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xvi
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
August 7, 1992
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1992
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xvii
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
July 30, 1993
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xviii
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated
January 26, 1994
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, as
amended through January 26, 1994 (restated for the purpose
of filing on EDGAR)
|
|
3(c)
|
|
1993
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
By-Laws as amended through
December 13, 2006, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
April 28, 2006, by and between the Company and SunTrust
Bank, as trustee relating to
71/8
Notes due 2016.
|
|
4.1
|
|
May 3, 2006
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated April 28, 2006, among the Company, the Guarantors
named therein and the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by the Company on May 3, 2006) relating to
71/8
Notes due 2016.
|
|
4.2
|
|
May 3, 2006.
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated
as of September [], 2006, among Glatfelter Holdings,
LLC, Glatfelter Holdings II, LLC, the Existing Subsidiary
Guarantors named therein and SunTrust Bank relating to
71/8 Notes
due 2016.
|
|
4.3
|
|
September 22, 2006
Form S-4/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company Management
Incentive Plan, adopted as of January 1, 1994, as amended
and restated December 19, 2000 and effective
January 1, 2001.**
|
|
10(a)
|
|
2000
Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company 2005
Management Incentive Plan, adopted as of April 27, 2005.**
|
|
10.4
|
|
April 27, 2005
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated
effective April 23, 1998 and further amended
December 20, 2000.**
|
|
10(c)
|
|
2000
Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
Description of Executive Salary
Continuation Plan.**
|
|
10(g)
|
|
1990
Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company
Supplemental Management Pension Plan, effective as of
April 23, 1998.**
|
|
10(f)
|
|
1998
Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company 1992 Key
Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended December 20,
2000.**
|
|
10(g)
|
|
2000
Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan, adopted as of April 27, 2005.**
|
|
10.1
|
|
April 27, 2005
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
(A)
|
|
Form of Top Management Restricted
Stock Unit Award Certificate.**
|
|
10.2
|
|
April 27, 2005
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
(B)
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director
Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate**
|
|
10.3
|
|
April 27, 2005
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of April 22,
1998.**
|
|
10(h)
|
|
1998
Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
Change in Control Employment
Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and George H.
Glatfelter II, dated as of December 31, 2005.**
|
|
10(i)
|
|
2005 Form 10-K
|
|
|
-56-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Documents
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
(Filing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
Form of Change in Control
Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and
certain employees, dated as of December 31, 2005.**
|
|
10(j)A
|
|
2005 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
(A)
|
|
Schedule of Change in Control
Employment Agreements.**
|
|
10(j)
|
|
2005 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the State of
Wisconsin and Certain Companies Concerning the Fox River, dated
as of January 31, 1997, among P. H. Glatfelter Company,
Fort Howard Corporation, NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers
Inc., Riverside Paper Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills,
Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. and the State of Wisconsin.
|
|
10(i)
|
|
1996
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of
April 3, 2006, by and among the Company, certain of the
Companys subsidiaries as guarantors, the banks party
thereto, PNC Bank, National Association, as agent for the banks
under the Credit Agreement, PNC Capital Markets LLC and Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as joint arrangers and bookrunners,
and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as syndication agent.
|
|
10.1
|
|
April 7, 2006
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
|
Contract for the Purchase and
Bargain Sale of Property (exhibits omitted)
|
|
10(m)
|
|
2002
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
March 21, 2003, among GPW Timberlands, LLC, (a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Registrant) and SunTrust Bank, as
Administrative Agent.
|
|
10.3
|
|
March 31, 2003
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
|
|
Consent Decree for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action at Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox
River and Green Bay site by and among the United States of
America and the State of Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter
Company and WTMI Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills, Inc.)
|
|
10.2
|
|
October 1, 2003
Form 8-K/A
No. 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(p)
|
|
|
|
Compensatory Arrangements with
Certain Executive Officers, filed herewith.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q)
|
|
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director
Compensation, (effective January 1, 2005).**
|
|
10.1
|
|
December 15, 2004
Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(r)
|
|
|
|
Service Agreement between the
Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and Martin Rapp,
filed herewith.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(s)
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock-Only Stock
Appreciation Right Award Certificate, filed herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(t)
|
|
|
|
Form of 2007 Top Management
Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate, filed herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(u)
|
|
|
|
Consulting Agreement between the
Registrant and John C. van Roden, Jr., filed herewith.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
|
|
P.H. Glatfelter Company Management
Incentive Plans, effective January 1, 1982, as amended and
restated effective January 1, 1994.**
|
|
10(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code of Business Ethics for the CEO
and Senior Financial Officers of Glatfelter.
|
|
14
|
|
2003
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant,
filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of George H.
Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of John P. Jacunski,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter,
pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of
2002, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of George H.
Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of John P. Jacunski,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan
|
-57-
GLATFELTER
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
March 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II
|
George H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ George H.
Glatfelter II
George H.
Glatfelter II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Principal Executive Officer and
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ John P. Jacunski
John P. Jacunski
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ David C. Elder
David C. Elder
Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
|
|
Controller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ Kathleen A. Dahlberg
Kathleen A. Dahlberg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ Nicholas DeBenedictis
Nicholas
DeBenedictis
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ Richard C. III
Richard C. III
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ J. Robert Hall
J. Robert Hall
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ Ronald J. Naples
Ronald J. Naples
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Smoot
Richard L. Smoot
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 15, 2007
|
|
/s/ Lee C. Stewart
Lee C. Stewart
|
|
Director
|
|
|
-58-
GLATFELTER
EXHIBIT
31.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, George H. Glatfelter II, certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 of P.H. Glatfelter
Company (Glatfelter);
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report.
|
|
4.
|
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for Glatfelter and have:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
Glatfelter, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of Glatfelters disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
Glatfelters most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
Glatfelters internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
|
5. |
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to Glatfelters auditors and the audit
committee of the Glatfelters board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Glatfelters ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: March 15, 2007
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II
|
George H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-59-
GLATFELTER
EXHIBIT
31.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, John P. Jacunski, certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 of P.H. Glatfelter
Company (Glatfelter);
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
|
|
4.
|
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for Glatfelter and have:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
Glatfelter, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of Glatfelters disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
Glatfelters most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
Glatfelters internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
|
5. |
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to Glatfelters auditors and the audit
committee of the Glatfelters board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Glatfelters ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: March 15, 2007
John P. Jacunski
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
-60-
GLATFELTER
Schedule II
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
For Each
of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2006
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
Sales Discounts and Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
$931
|
|
|
|
|
$2,364
|
|
|
|
$3,115
|
|
|
|
$2,405
|
|
|
|
|
$2,217
|
|
|
|
$2,038
|
|
|
|
Provision (a)
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, recoveries and
discounts allowed
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,726
|
)
|
|
|
(1,643
|
)
|
|
|
(2,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,711
|
)
|
|
|
(3,947
|
)
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
$3,613
|
|
|
|
|
$931
|
|
|
|
$2,364
|
|
|
|
$2,945
|
|
|
|
|
$2,045
|
|
|
|
$2,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for doubtful accounts is included in
administrative expense and the provision for sales discounts and
deductions is deducted from sales. The related allowances are
deducted from accounts receivable.
(a) Includes $1.8 million of acquired allowances
in connection with the Chillicothe and Lydney acquisition.
(b) Relates primarily to changes in currency exchange
rates.
-61-
GLATFELTER