e10vk
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM
10-K
|
|
|
[ü]
|
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
or
|
[ ]
|
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-03560
P. H. Glatfelter
Company
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-0628360
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 South George Street, Suite 500
York, Pennsylvania 17401
|
|
(717) 225-4711
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes No
ü .
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes No
ü .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes ü No .
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy of
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
ü
Accelerated filer
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act)
Yes No ü .
Based on the closing price as of June 30, 2007, the
aggregate market value of Common Stock of the Registrant held by
non-affiliates was $539.8 million.
Common
Stock outstanding on March 6, 2008 totaled 45,167,030
shares.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the following documents are incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Proxy Statement to be dated on or about March 21,
2008 (Part III).
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended
DECEMBER
31, 2007
Table of
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Item 2
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Item 3
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Item 4
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5
|
|
|
Market for the Registrants Common Stock and
Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Item 6
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Item 7
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Item 8
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Item 11
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Item 12
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Item 13
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Item 14
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15
|
|
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Overview Glatfelter began operations in 1864 and today we
believe we are one of the worlds leading manufacturers of
specialty papers and engineered products. Headquartered in York,
Pennsylvania, we own and operate paper mills located in
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Germany, the United Kingdom and France, as
well as an abaca pulp mill in the Philippines.
We serve customers in numerous markets, including book
publishing, carbonless and forms, envelope and converting,
engineered products, food and beverage, composite laminates and
other highly technical niche markets. Many of the markets in
which we operate are characterized by higher-value-added
products and, in some cases, by higher growth prospects and
lower cyclicality than commodity paper markets. Examples of some
of our key product offerings include papers for:
|
|
|
|
|
trade book publishing;
|
|
|
carbonless products;
|
|
|
tea bags and coffee filters;
|
|
|
specialized envelopes;
|
|
|
playing cards;
|
|
|
pressure-sensitive postage stamps;
|
|
|
metallized papers for labels and packaging; and
|
|
|
digital imaging applications.
|
Recent Developments On November 30, 2007, we
completed the acquisition of Metallised Products Limited
(MPL), a privately owned company that manufactures a
variety of metallized paper products for consumer and industrial
applications. MPL is based in Caerphilly, Wales.
Under terms of the agreement, we purchased the stock of MPL for
$7.2 million cash and extinguished $5.8 million of MPL
debt at the closing. The purchase price is subject to
adjustments based on working capital and other factors.
This facility employs about 165 people and had 2007
revenues of approximately $53.4 million.
During 2006, the following events occurred that affected the
operations of our business units:
Specialty
Papers
|
|
|
|
|
On April 3, 2006, we completed the acquisition of the
carbonless business operations of NewPage Corporation, located
in Chillicothe, Ohio, for $83.3 million in cash. At the
time of the acquisition, this business had annual revenue of
approximately $440 million.
|
|
|
|
As part of our integration plan for Chillicothe, we transferred
the production of products manufactured at our former Neenah, WI
facility to Chillicothe and permanently shut down our Neenah
facility on June 30, 2006.
|
Composite
Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
On March 13, 2006, we acquired JR Cromptons Lydney
mill, located in Gloucestershire (Lydney), England, for
approximately $65 million. At the time of the acquisition,
the mill had annual revenue of approximately $75 million.
The Lydney mill produces a broad portfolio of wet laid non-woven
products, including tea bags and coffee filter papers,
double-sided adhesive tape substrates and battery grid pasting
tissue.
|
Our Business Units We manage our business as
two distinct units: the North America-based Specialty Papers
business unit and the Europe-based Composite Fibers business
unit. The following table summarizes consolidated net sales and
the relative net sales contribution of each of our business
units for the past three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,148,323
|
|
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business unit composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net tons sold by each business unit for the past three years
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
726,657
|
|
|
|
|
653,734
|
|
|
|
450,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
72,855
|
|
|
|
|
68,148
|
|
|
|
47,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
799,512
|
|
|
|
|
721,892
|
|
|
|
498,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers Our North
America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses on
producing papers for the following markets:
|
|
|
|
|
Book publishing papers for the production of high quality
hardbound books and other book publishing needs;
|
|
|
|
Carbonless and forms papers for credit card receipts,
multi-part forms, security papers and other end-user
applications;
|
|
|
|
Envelope and converting papers for the direct mail
market, shopping bags, and other converting
applications; and
|
-1-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered products for digital imaging, transfer,
casting, release, postal, playing card and other niche specialty
applications.
|
Specialty Papers revenue composition by market consisted
of the following for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Book publishing
|
|
$
|
185,343
|
|
|
|
$
|
166,605
|
|
|
$
|
157,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbonless & forms
|
|
|
345,785
|
|
|
|
|
266,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Envelope & converting
|
|
|
116,797
|
|
|
|
|
103,042
|
|
|
|
91,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered products
|
|
|
136,785
|
|
|
|
|
137,007
|
|
|
|
129,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,583
|
|
|
|
|
20,359
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
802,293
|
|
|
|
$
|
693,660
|
|
|
$
|
380,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe we are one of the leading suppliers of book
publishing papers in the United States and the second leading
carbonless paper producer. Specialty Papers also produces paper
that is converted into specialized envelopes in a wide array of
colors, finishes and capabilities. These markets are generally
more mature and, therefore, opportunities are generally
market-share based. The market for carbonless papers is
declining approximately 8% to 10% per year. However, we have
been successful in executing our strategy to replace this lost
volume with book publishing, forms and other products with more
stable or growing demand.
Specialty Papers highly technical engineered products
include those designed for multiple end uses, such as papers for
pressure-sensitive postage stamps, greeting and playing cards,
digital imaging applications and for release paper applications.
Such products comprise an array of distinct business niches that
are in a continuous state of evolution. Many of these products
are utilized by demanding, specialized customer and end-user
applications. Some of our products are new and high growth while
others are more mature and further along in the product life
cycle. Because many of these products are technically complex
and involve substantial customer-supplier development
collaboration, they typically command higher per ton values and
generally exhibit greater pricing stability relative to
commodity grade paper products.
Composite Fibers Our Composite Fibers
business unit, based in Gernsbach, Germany, serves customers
globally and focuses on higher-value-added products in the
following markets:
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Beverage paper used for tea bags and
coffee pods/pads and filters;
|
|
|
|
Composite Laminates papers used in production of
decorative laminates used for furniture and flooring;
|
|
|
|
Metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles,
innerliners and other consumer products applications; and
|
|
|
|
Technical Specialties is a diverse line of paper products
used in medical masks, batteries and other highly engineered
applications.
|
Composite Fibers revenue composition by market consisted
of the following for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Food & beverage
|
|
$
|
218,961
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,258
|
|
|
$
|
103,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite laminates
|
|
|
52,972
|
|
|
|
|
50,734
|
|
|
|
42,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metallized
|
|
|
45,426
|
|
|
|
|
40,078
|
|
|
|
35,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical specialties and other
|
|
|
28,671
|
|
|
|
|
21,681
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
346,030
|
|
|
|
$
|
292,751
|
|
|
$
|
198,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our focus on products made from abaca pulp has made us the
worlds largest producer of tea bag and coffee pods/pads
and filter papers. The balance of this units sales are
comprised of overlay and technical specialty products, which
include flooring and furniture overlay papers, metallized
products, and papers for adhesive tapes, vacuum bags,
holographic labels and gift wrap. Many of this units
papers are technically sophisticated. The acquisition of MPL is
designed to leverage our technical capabilities to serve the
attractive metallized products market. All of the papers
produced in the Composite Fibers business unit, except for
metallized papers, are extremely lightweight and require very
specialized fibers. Our engineering capabilities, specifically
designed papermaking equipment and customer orientation position
us well to compete in these global markets.
Additional financial information for each of our business units
is included in Item 7 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and in Item 8 Financial Statements,
Note 21.
Our Competitive Strengths Since commencing
operations over 140 years ago, we believe that Glatfelter
has developed into one of the worlds leading manufacturers
of specialty papers and engineered products. We believe that the
following competitive strengths have contributed to our success:
Leading market positions in higher-value, niche
segments. We have focused our resources to
achieve market-leading positions in certain higher-value, niche
segments. Our products include various highly specialized paper
products designed for technically demanding end uses.
Consequently, many of our products achieve premium pricing
relative to that of commodity paper grades. In 2007,
approximately 81%
-2-
GLATFELTER
of our sales were derived from these higher-value, niche
products as compared to 82% in 2006. The specialized nature of
these products generally provides greater pricing stability
relative to commodity paper products.
Customer-centric business
focus. We offer a unique and diverse product line
that can be customized to serve the individual needs of our
customers. Our customer focus allows us to develop close
relationships with our key customers and to be adaptable in our
product development, manufacturing, sales and marketing
practices. We believe that this approach has led to the
development of excellent customer relationships, defensible
market positions, and increased pricing stability relative to
commodity paper producers. Additionally, our customer-centric
focus has been a key driver to our success in new product
development.
Significant investment in product
development. In order to keep up with our
customers ever-changing needs, we continually enhance our
product offerings through significant investment in product
development. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we invested
approximately $8.7 million, $8.0 million and
$4.9 million, respectively, in product development
activities. We derive a significant portion of our revenue from
products developed, enhanced or improved as a result of these
activities. Revenue generated from products developed, enhanced
or improved within the five previous years as a result of these
activities represented approximately 53% of net sales in each of
the past three years ended December 31, 2007.
Integrated production. As a nearly
fully integrated producer, we are able to mitigate changes in
the costs of certain raw materials and energy. In Specialty
Papers, our Spring Grove and Chillicothe facilities are
vertically integrated operations producing in excess of 85% of
the annual pulp required for their paper production. The
principal raw material used to produce this pulp is pulpwood,
consisting of both hardwoods and softwoods. Our Spring Grove and
Chillicothe facilities also generate 100% of the steam and
substantially all of the electricity required for their
operations. In Composite Fibers, our Philippine mill processes
abaca fiber to produce abaca pulp, a key raw material used by
this business unit. The Philippine mill produces approximately
70% of the annual abaca pulp required for Composite Fibers
production.
Our Business Strategy Our vision is to become
the global supplier of choice in specialty papers and engineered
products. We are continuously developing and refining strategies
to strengthen our business and position it for the future.
Execution of these strategies is intended to capitalize on our
customer relationships, technology and people, as well as our
leadership positions in certain product lines. Components
include:
Specialty Papers The North American
uncoated free sheet market has been challenged by a supply and
demand imbalance, particularly for commodity-like products.
While the industry has narrowed the supply-demand gap by
eliminating capacity, the imbalance continues. To be successful
in the current market environment, our strategy is focused on:
|
|
|
|
|
employing a low-cost approach to our manufacturing activities
and implementing cost reduction initiatives including the
Chillicothe profit improvement initiatives;
|
|
|
|
improving business processes and deploying continuous
improvement capabilities to maintain market leadership positions
in customer service; and
|
|
|
|
optimizing our products mix by growing book publishing,
envelope, forms and engineered products and utilizing new
product development capabilities to replace declining carbonless
volumes.
|
Composite Fibers A core component of
this business units long-term strategy is to capture
world-wide growth in its core markets of food &
beverage, composite laminates and metallized papers. Composite
Fibers strategy also includes enhancing product mix across all
of its markets by utilizing new product development
capabilities. In addition, the Composite Fibers business unit is
focused on cost reduction initiatives including, among others,
work-force efficiencies and supply chain management.
Balance Sheet We are focused on prudent
financial management and the maintenance of a conservative
capital structure. We are committed to maintaining a strong
balance sheet and preserving our flexibility so that we may
pursue strategic opportunities, including strategic acquisitions
that will benefit our shareholders.
Timberland Strategy In 2006, we
initiated a strategy to sell substantially all of our
timberlands. At the time the strategy was announced, we expected
proceeds from the sales to generate approximately
$150 million to $200 million by the end of 2010.
Through the end of 2007, we have sold approximately
43,400 acres of timberland for an aggregate price of
-3-
GLATFELTER
$104.4 million. Although proceeds have been used to reduce
debt obligations, the sale of timberland will require us to
replace company owned timberland as a source of fiber with more
costly purchased woods. We believe the interest expense
reduction and the financial flexibility for investment offer a
greater return than the additional higher cost for raw fiber.
Raw Material and Energy The following table
provides an overview of the estimated amount of principal raw
materials (PRM) expected to be used in 2008 by each
of our manufacturing facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity
|
|
PRM
|
|
|
|
|
(short tons)
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring Grove
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulpwood
|
|
|
1,051,000
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
37,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulpwood
|
|
|
1,207,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood and other pulps
|
|
|
37,600
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Abaca pulp
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
Synthetic fiber
|
|
|
9,400
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Metallized base stock
|
|
|
30,400
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
Abaca fiber
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Spring Grove, Pennsylvania and Chillicothe, Ohio mills are
vertically integrated operations producing in excess of 85% of
the combined annual pulp required for paper production. The
principal raw material used to produce this pulp is pulpwood, of
which both hardwoods and softwoods are used. Hardwoods are
available within a relatively short distance of our mills.
Softwoods are obtained from a variety of locations in relatively
close proximity to the location of the respective mill and
includes the states of Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware,
Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee and South Carolina. To protect our
sources of pulpwood, we actively promote conservation and forest
management among suppliers and woodland owners. In addition to
sourcing the pulpwood in the open market, we have long-term
supply contracts that provide access to timber at market prices.
In addition to integrated pulp making, both the Spring Grove and
Chillicothe facilities generate 100% of the steam and 100% and
80%, respectively, of their electricity needs. Principal fuel
sources vary by facility and include over 600,000 tons of coal,
870,000 MMBTUs of natural gas, as well as recycled pulping
chemicals, bark, wood waste, and oil. Spring Groves coal
needs are met under a contract that expires at the end of 2009
and Chillicothes contract expires in November 2008.
The Spring Grove facility produces more electricity than it
requires. Excess electricity is sold to the local power company
under a long-term co-generation contract expiring in 2010.
Energy sales, net of costs to produce, were $9.4 million in
2007, $10.7 million in 2006 and $10.1 million in 2005.
The continuation of this revenue stream at these levels is
dependent on our ability to negotiate a contract for periods
beyond 2010.
The Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney facilities generate all of
the steam required for their operations. The Gernsbach facility
generated approximately 19% of its 2007 electricity needs and
purchased the balance. The Scaër and Lydney facilities
purchased 100% of their 2007 electric power requirements.
Natural gas was used to produce substantially all internally
generated energy at the Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney
facilities during 2007.
Our Philippines mill processes abaca fiber to produce a
specialized pulp. This abaca pulp production provides a unique
advantage by supplying a key raw material used by our Composite
Fibers business unit. The supply of abaca fiber has been
constrained due to severe weather related damage to the source
crop as well as selection by land owners of alternative uses of
land in lieu of fiber producing activities. In addition, events
may arise from the relatively unstable political and economic
environment in which the Philippine facility operates that could
interrupt the production of abaca pulp. Management periodically
evaluates the availability of abaca pulp for our Composite
Fibers business unit. Any extended interruption of the
Philippine operation could have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position
and/or
results of operations. We target to have approximately one month
of fiber supply in stock and one month of fiber supply at sea
available to us. In addition, we have established contingency
plans for alternative sources of abaca pulp. However, the cost
of obtaining abaca pulp from such alternative sources, if
available, would likely be higher.
Based on information currently available, we believe that we
will continue to have ready access, for the foreseeable future,
to all principal raw materials used in the production of our
products. However, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, the
supply of abaca fiber has been constrained and has adversely
impacted pricing. The cost of our raw materials is subject to
change, including, but not limited to, costs of wood, pulp
products and energy.
Concentration of Customers In past three
years, no single customer represented more than 10% of our
consolidated net sales.
-4-
GLATFELTER
Competition Our industry is highly
competitive. We compete on the basis of product quality,
customer service, product development, price and distribution.
We offer our products throughout the United States and globally
in approximately 85 countries. Competition in the markets in
which we participate comes from companies of various sizes, some
of which have greater financial and other resources than we do.
There are a number of companies in the United States that
manufacture printing and converting papers. We believe we are
one of the leading producers of book publishing papers and
compete in these markets with, among others, Domtar and Fraser.
In the envelope sector we compete with, among others,
International Paper, Domtar and Blue Ridge. In the carbonless
paper and forms market, we compete with Appleton Papers and, to
a lesser extent, Nekoosa Papers, Inc. In our Specialty
Papers engineered products markets and for the Composite
Fibers business units markets, competition is product line
specific as the necessity for technical expertise and
specialized manufacturing equipment limits the number of
companies offering multiple product lines. We compete with
specialty divisions of large companies such as, among others,
Ahlstrom, International Paper, MeadWestvaco, Sappi and Stora
Enso. Service, product performance, technological advances and
product pricing are important competitive factors with respect
to all our products. We believe our reputation in these areas
continues to be excellent.
Capital Expenditures Our business is capital
intensive and requires extensive expenditures for new and
enhanced equipment. These capital investments are necessary for
environmental compliance, normal upgrades or replacements,
business strategy and research and development. In 2008, we
expect capital expenditures to total $52 million to
$57 million, including a $10 million investment to
upgrade the capabilities of one of our inclined wire paper
machines in Germany.
Environmental Matters We are subject to loss
contingencies resulting from regulation by various federal,
state, local and foreign governmental authorities with respect
to the environmental impact of our mills. To comply with
environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred substantial
capital and operating expenditures in past years. For a
discussion of environmental matters, see Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 20.
Employees The following table summarizes our
workforce as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
Location
|
|
Hourly
|
|
|
Salaried
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Union
|
|
Start
|
|
End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/Spring Grove
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
United Steelworkers of
America (USW) & Office and
Professional
|
|
February 2008
|
|
January 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe/Fremont
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
Employees International Union
|
|
August 2006
|
|
August 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gernsbach, Germany & Scaër
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
Various
|
|
May 2007
|
|
Sept 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lydney
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
Unite
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caerphilly
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
General Maintenance & Boilers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Dec 2002
|
|
Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We consider the overall relationship with our employees to be
satisfactory.
Available Information On our investor
relations website at www.glatfelter.com we make available free
of charge our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and other related information as soon as reasonably practical
after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. In addition, our website includes a Corporate
Governance page consisting of, among others, our Governance
Principles and Code of Business Conduct, Board of Directors and
Executive Officers, Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating
Committees of the Board of Directors and their respective
Charters, Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior
Financial Officers of Glatfelter, our whistle-blower
policy and other related material. We intend to satisfy the
disclosure requirement for any future amendments to, or waivers
from, our Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics
for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers by posting such
information on our website. We will provide a copy of the Code
of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and
Senior Financial Officers, without charge, to any person who
requests one, by calling
(717) 225-2724.
-5-
GLATFELTER
Risks
Related to Our Business
The
cost of raw materials and energy used to manufacture our
products could increase and the availability of certain raw
materials could become more constrained.
We require access to sufficient and reasonably priced quantities
of pulpwood, purchased pulps, pulp substitutes, abaca fiber and
certain other raw materials. Our Spring Grove and Chillicothe
locations are vertically integrated manufacturing facilities
that generate in excess of 85% of their annual pulp
requirements. However, as a result of selling timberlands over
the past two years, purchased timber will represent a larger
source of the total pulpwood used in our operations.
Our Philippine mill purchases abaca fiber to make pulp, which we
use to manufacture our composite fiber products at our
Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney facilities. However, the supply
of abaca fiber has been constrained due to severe weather
related damage to the source crop as well as selection by land
owners of alternative uses of land in lieu of fiber producing
activities. As a result of supply constraints, pricing pressure
persists.
The cost of many of our production materials and costs,
including petroleum based chemicals and freight charges, are
influenced by the cost of oil. In addition, coal is a principal
source fuel for both the Spring Grove and Chillicothe
facilities. Natural gas is the principal source of fuel for our
Chillicothe and Composite Fibers business unit facilities.
Natural gas prices have increased significantly in the United
States since 2000.
We may not be able to pass increased raw materials or energy
costs on to our customers if the market will not bear the higher
price or where existing agreements with our customers limit
price increases. If price adjustments significantly trail
increases in raw materials or energy prices our operating
results could be adversely affected.
Our
business and financial performance may be adversely affected by
downturns in the target markets that we serve.
Demand for our products in the markets we serve is primarily
driven by consumption of the products we produce, which is most
often affected by general economic conditions. Downturns in our
target markets could result in decreased demand for our
products. In particular, our business may be adversely affected
during periods of economic weakness by the general softness in
these target markets. Our results could be adversely affected if
economic conditions weaken or fail to improve. Also, there may
be periods during which demand for our products is insufficient
to enable us to operate our production facilities in an
economical manner. These conditions are beyond our ability to
control and may have a significant impact on our sales and
results of operations.
In addition to fluctuations in demand for our products in the
markets we serve, the markets for our paper products are also
significantly affected by changes in industry capacity and
output levels. There have been periods of supply/demand
imbalance in the pulp and paper industry, which have caused pulp
and paper prices to be volatile. The timing and magnitude of
price increases or decreases in the pulp and paper market have
generally varied by region and by product type. A sustained
period of weak demand or excess supply would likely adversely
affect pulp and paper prices. This could have a material adverse
affect on our operating and financial results.
Our
industry is highly competitive and increased competition could
reduce our sales and profitability.
In recent years, the global paper industry in which we compete
has been adversely affected by paper producing capacity
exceeding the demand for products. As a result, the uncoated
free sheet industry has taken steps to reduce underperforming
capacity. However, slowing demand or increased competition could
force us to lower our prices or to offer additional services at
a higher cost to us, which could reduce our gross margins and
net income. The greater financial resources of certain of our
competitors may enable them to commit larger amounts of capital
in response to changing market conditions. Certain competitors
may also have the ability to develop product or service
innovations that could put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Some of the factors that may adversely affect our ability to
compete in the markets in which we participate include:
|
|
|
|
|
the entry of new competitors into the markets we serve,
including foreign producers;
|
|
|
|
the willingness of commodity-based paper producers to enter our
specialty markets when they are unable to compete or when demand
softens in their traditional markets;
|
-6-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
|
|
the aggressiveness of our competitors pricing strategies,
which could force us to decrease prices in order to maintain
market share;
|
|
|
|
our failure to anticipate and respond to changing customer
preferences;
|
|
|
|
our inability to develop new, improved or enhanced
products; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to maintain the cost efficiency of our facilities.
|
If we cannot effectively compete in the markets in which we
operate, our sales and operating results would be adversely
affected.
We may
not be able to develop new products acceptable to our
customers.
Our business strategy is market focused and includes investments
in developing new products to meet the changing needs of our
customers and to maintain our market share. Our success will
depend in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new
and enhanced products that keep pace with introductions by our
competitors and changing customer preferences. If we fail to
anticipate or respond adequately to these factors, we may lose
opportunities for business with both current and potential
customers. The success of our new product offerings will depend
on several factors, including our ability to,
|
|
|
|
|
anticipate and properly identify our customers needs and
industry trends;
|
|
|
price our products competitively;
|
|
|
develop and commercialize new products and applications in a
timely manner;
|
|
|
differentiate our products from our competitors
products; and
|
|
|
invest in research and development activities efficiently.
|
Our inability to develop new products could adversely impact our
business and ultimately harm our profitability.
We are
subject to substantial costs and potential liability for
environmental matters.
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations
that govern our operations, including discharges into the
environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous
substances and wastes. We are also subject to laws and
regulations that impose liability and
clean-up
responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the
environment. To comply with environmental laws and regulations,
we have incurred, and will continue to incur, substantial
capital and operating expenditures. We anticipate that
environmental regulation of our operations will continue to
become more burdensome and that capital and operating
expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations
will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. Because
environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our
ability to compete in the world marketplace may be adversely
affected by capital and operating expenditures required for
environmental compliance. In addition, we may incur obligations
to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment,
such as air and water quality, resulting from mills we operate
or have operated. Potential obligations include compensation for
the restoration of natural resources, personal injury and
property damages.
We are liable for remediation on costs related to the presence
of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, in the lower Fox River on
which our former Neenah, Wisconsin mill was located. We have
financial reserves for environmental matters but we cannot be
certain that those reserves will be adequate to provide for
future obligations related to these matters, that our share of
costs and/or
damages for these matters will not exceed our available
resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term,
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
Our environmental issues are complicated and should be reviewed
in context; please see a more detailed discussion of these
matters in Item 8 Financial Statements,
Note 20
We
have operations in a potentially politically and economically
unstable location.
We own and operate a pulp mill in the Philippines where the
operating environment is unstable and subject to political
unrest. Our Philippine pulp mill produces abaca pulp, a
significant raw material used by our Composite Fibers business
unit. Our Philippine pulp mill is currently our main provider of
abaca pulp. There are limited suitable alternative sources of
readily available abaca pulp in the world. In the event of a
disruption in supply from our Philippine mill, there is no
guarantee that we could obtain adequate amounts of abaca pulp
from alternative sources at a reasonable price or at all. As a
consequence, any civil disturbance, unrest, political
instability or other event that causes a disruption in supply
could limit the availability of abaca pulp and would increase
our cost of obtaining
-7-
GLATFELTER
abaca pulp. Such occurrences could adversely impact our sales
volumes, revenues and operating results.
Our
international operations pose certain risks that may adversely
impact sales and earnings.
We have significant operations and assets located in Germany,
France, the United Kingdom, and the Philippines. Our
international sales and operations are subject to a number of
special risks, in addition to the risks in our domestic sales
and operations, including differing protections of intellectual
property, trade barriers, labor unrest, exchange controls,
regional economic uncertainty, differing (and possibly more
stringent) labor regulation, risk of governmental expropriation,
domestic and foreign customs and tariffs, differing regulatory
environments, difficulty in managing widespread operations and
political instability. These factors may adversely affect our
future profits. Also, in some foreign jurisdictions, we may be
subject to laws limiting the right and ability of entities
organized or operating therein to pay dividends or remit
earnings to affiliated companies unless specified conditions are
met. Any such limitations would restrict our flexibility in
using funds generated in those jurisdictions.
Foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our
results of operations.
We own and operate paper and pulp mills in Germany, France, the
United Kingdom and the Philippines. The local currency in
Germany and France is the Euro, in the UK the British Pound
Sterling, and in the Philippines the Peso. During 2007, Euro
functional currency operations generated approximately 19.9% of
our sales and 18.8% of operating expenses and British Pound
Sterling operations represented 7.6% of net sales and 7.8% of
operating expenses. The translation of the results from these
international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Our ability to maintain our products price competitiveness
is reliant, in part, on the relative strength of the currency in
which the product is denominated compared to the currency of the
market into which it is sold and the functional currency of our
competitors. Changes in the rate of exchange of foreign
currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar, and other
currencies, may adversely impact our results of operations and
our ability to offer products in certain markets at acceptable
prices.
In the
event any of the above risk factors impact our business in a
material way or in combination during the same period, we may be
unable to generate sufficient cash flow to simultaneously fund
our operations, finance capital expenditures, satisfy
obligations and make dividend payments on our common
stock.
In addition to debt service obligations, our business is capital
intensive and requires significant expenditures for equipment
maintenance, new or enhanced equipment, environmental
compliance, and research and development to support our business
strategies. We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash
needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash
equivalents, our existing credit facility and other long-term
debt. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from
these sources, we could be unable to meet our near and long-term
cash needs or make dividend payments.
Our leased corporate offices are located in York, Pennsylvania.
We own and operate paper mills located in Pennsylvania; Ohio;
the United Kingdom; Germany; and France. Our metallized paper
production facility located in Caerphilly, Wales leases the
building and land associated with its operations. We also own
and operate a pulp mill in the Philippines. Substantially all of
the equipment used in our papermaking and related operations, is
also owned. All of our properties, other than those that are
leased, are free from any material liens or encumbrances. We
consider all of our buildings to be in good structural condition
and well maintained and our properties to be suitable and
adequate for present operations.
The following table summarizes the estimated production capacity
of each of our facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Annual Production
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity (short tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring Grove
|
|
|
332,000
|
|
|
|
Uncoated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
|
|
Coated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
Uncoated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
Coated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gernsbach
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
Lightweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
Metallized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaër
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
Lightweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lydney
|
|
|
16,700
|
|
|
|
Lightweight
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caerphilly
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
Metallized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
Abaca pulp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Spring Grove facility includes five uncoated paper machines
that have been rebuilt and modernized from time to time with the
capacity to produce 332,000 tons. It has an off-line combi-blade
coater and a Specialty Coater (S-Coater), which
together yield a potential annual production capacity for coated
paper of approximately 68,000 tons. Since uncoated
-8-
GLATFELTER
paper is used in producing coated paper, this is not additional
capacity. We view the S-Coater as an important asset that allows
us to expand our more profitable engineered paper products
business.
The Spring Grove facility also includes a pulpmill that has a
production capacity of approximately 650 tons of bleached pulp
per day. We have a precipitated calcium carbonate
(PCC) plant at our Spring Grove facility that
produces PCC at a lower cost than could be purchased from others
and lowers the need for higher-priced raw material typically
used for increasing the opacity and brightness of certain papers.
The Chillicothe facility operates four paper machines which
together yield a potential annual production capacity of
uncoated and carbonless paper of approximately 400,000 tons. In
addition, this location produces 7,500 tons per year of other
coated paper. This facility also includes a pulpmill that has a
production capacity of approximately 955 tons of bleached pulp
per day.
The Composite Fibers business units four facilities
operate a combined ten papermaking machines with the capacity to
produce approximately 60,700 tons of lightweight paper on an
annual basis. In addition, the business unit has the capacity to
produce an aggregate of 27,500 tons of metallized papers from
its lacquering and metallizing operations in Gernsbach, Germany
and Caerphilly, Wales.
Our Philippines facility consists of a pulpmill that supplies a
majority of the abaca pulp requirements of the Composite Fibers
paper mills.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in various lawsuits that we consider to be
ordinary and incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of
these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we
do not expect such lawsuits individually or in the aggregate,
will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
For a discussion of commitments, legal proceedings and related
contingencies, see Item 8 Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data Note 20.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|
Not Applicable no matters were submitted to a vote
of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our executive officers as of March 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Office with the Company
|
|
|
George H. Glatfelter II
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Dante C. Parrini
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
John P. Jacunski
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Timothy R. Hess
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Papers Business
Unit
|
Jeffrey J. Norton
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Martin Rapp
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President and General Manager, Composite Fibers Business
Unit
|
Mark A. Sullivan
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice President Global Supply Chain
|
William T. Yanavitch II
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President Human Resources and Administration
|
David C. Elder
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
Officers are elected to serve at the pleasure of the Board of
Directors. Except in the case of officers elected to fill a new
position or a vacancy occurring at some other date, officers are
generally elected at the organizational meeting of the Board of
Directors held immediately after the annual meeting of
shareholders.
George H. Glatfelter II is our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. From April 2000 to February 2001,
Mr. Glatfelter was Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer. From June 1998 to April 2000, he was Chief Executive
Officer and President.
Mr. Glatfelter serves as a director of Met-Pro Corporation.
Dante C. Parrini became Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer in February 2005. Prior to this,
Mr. Parrini was Senior Vice President and General Manager,
a position he held since January 2003. From December 2000 until
January 2003, Mr. Parrini was Vice President
Sales and Marketing. From July 2000 to December 2000, he was
Vice President Sales and Marketing, Glatfelter
Division and Corporate Strategic Marketing.
John P. Jacunski became Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer in July 2006. From October 2003 until
July 2006, he was Vice President and Corporate Controller.
Mr. Jacunski was previously Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer at WCI Steel, Inc. from June 1999 to October
2003. Prior to joining WCI, Mr. Jacunski was with KPMG, an
international accounting and consulting firm, where he served in
various capacities.
Timothy R. Hess has been Vice President and General
Manager Specialty Papers Business Unit since
February 2006. Prior to this he was the Companys Director
of Specialty Papers Business Unit, a position he held since
January 2004. From 1994
-9-
GLATFELTER
until January 2004, Mr. Hess held various technical,
manufacturing, sales and business development positions with
Glatfelter.
Jeffrey J. Norton joined us in May 2005 and serves as
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining
Glatfelter, Mr. Norton was with Exelon Corporation, for
14 years where he was Assistant General Counsel.
Martin Rapp joined Glatfelter in August 2006 and serves
as Vice President and General Manager Composite
Fibers Business Unit. Prior to this, Mr. Rapp was Vice
President and General Manager of Avery Dennisons Roll
Materials Business in Central and Eastern Europe since August
2002. From May 2000 until July 2002 Mr. Rapp was Partner
and Managing Director of BonnConsult.
Mark A. Sullivan was appointed Vice President, Global
Supply Chain in February 2005. Mr. Sullivan joined our
company in December 2003, as Chief Procurement Officer. His
experience includes a broad array of operations and supply chain
management responsibilities during 20 years with the DuPont
Company. He served with
T-Mobile USA
as an independent contractor during 2003, and Concur
Technologies from 1999 until 2002.
William T. Yanavitch II rejoined the Company in May
2005 as Vice President Human Resources and Administration.
Mr. Yanavitch served as Vice President Human Resources from
July 2000 until his resignation in January 2005 at which time he
became Corporate Human Resources Manager of Constellation Energy.
David C. Elder became Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer in July 2006 after joining the company in
January 2006. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Elder was
Corporate Controller for YORK International Corporation, a
position he held since December 2003. Prior thereto, he was the
Director, Financial Planning and Analysis for YORK International
Corporation from August 2000 to December 2003.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Common Stock Prices and Dividends Declared Information
The following table shows the high and low prices of our common
stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
GLT and the dividend declared per share for each
quarter during the past two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
17.23
|
|
|
$
|
14.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
15.59
|
|
|
|
12.47
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
16.30
|
|
|
|
12.92
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
18.05
|
|
|
|
14.86
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
$
|
15.95
|
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
16.23
|
|
|
|
12.98
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
19.84
|
|
|
|
14.45
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
18.65
|
|
|
|
13.12
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 6, 2008, we had 1,627 shareholders of
record. A number of the shareholders of record are nominees.
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph below compares the cumulative
5-year total
return of our common stock with the cumulative total returns of
both a peer group and a broad market index. In 2007, we changed
the comparative peer group and the broad market index. In
previous years, the peer group consisted of Bowater, Inc. (which
merged with Abitibi-Consolidated to form AbitibiBowater
Inc), Chesapeake Corp., MeadWestvaco Corp., Pope &
Talbot, Potlatch Corp., Schweitzer-Mauduit International and
Wausau Paper Corp. For the 2007 peer group comparison, we
modified the companies included to reflect changes in the
industry in which we compete, to give effect to mergers
and/or
divestitures and other considerations. The new peer group
retains AbitibiBowater Inc, Schweitzer-Mauduit International and
Wausau Paper Corp., and now includes Neenah Paper Inc.
Prior to 2007, Glatfelter common stock was included in the
S&P MidCap 400. During 2007, our stock is no longer a part
of this index. Accordingly, we are comparing our stock to the
Russell 2000, which we believe is an appropriate comparable for
stocks such as Glatfelter.
The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common
stock, in each index, and in each of the peer groups (including
reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on December 31, 2002
and charts it through December 31, 2007.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among
Glatfelter, The S&P Midcap 400 Index,
The Russell 2000 Index, A New Peer Group and an Old Peer Group
Copyright©
2008, Standard & Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.researchdatagroup.com/S&P.htm
-11-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,148,323
|
|
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
$
|
543,524
|
|
|
$
|
533,193
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
9,953
|
|
|
|
10,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
1,157,768
|
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
553,477
|
|
|
|
543,233
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges and unusual items
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
(30,318
|
)
|
|
|
(1,564
|
)
|
|
|
(20,375
|
)
|
|
|
(24,995
|
)
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
78,685
|
|
|
|
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
22,053
|
|
|
|
58,509
|
|
|
|
32,334
|
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
20,151
|
|
|
|
32,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
63,472
|
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
56,102
|
|
|
|
12,986
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,287,067
|
|
|
|
|
1,225,643
|
|
|
|
1,044,977
|
|
|
|
1,052,270
|
|
|
|
1,027,019
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
313,185
|
|
|
|
|
397,613
|
|
|
|
207,073
|
|
|
|
211,227
|
|
|
|
254,275
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
476,068
|
|
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
|
|
420,370
|
|
|
|
371,431
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,141
|
|
|
|
|
44,821
|
|
|
|
44,132
|
|
|
|
43,950
|
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
28,960
|
|
|
|
|
44,460
|
|
|
|
31,024
|
|
|
|
18,587
|
|
|
|
66,758
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
56,001
|
|
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
50,647
|
|
|
|
51,598
|
|
|
|
56,029
|
|
|
|
Tons sold
|
|
|
799,512
|
|
|
|
|
721,892
|
|
|
|
498,593
|
|
|
|
470,422
|
|
|
|
495,566
|
|
|
|
Number of employees
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above Summary of Selected
Consolidated Financial Data, and the comparability thereof,
includes the impact of certain charges and gains from asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries. For a discussion of these
items that affect the comparability of this information, see
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplemental
Data Notes 4 to 7.
-12-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements
other than statements of historical fact, including statements
regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial
position or results of operations, made in this Report on
Form 10-K
are forward looking. We use words such as
anticipates, believes,
expects, future, intends and
similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements reflect managements current
expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results
may differ significantly from such expectations. The following
discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding
expectations of, among others, net sales, costs of products
sold, non-cash pension income, environmental costs, capital
expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently
difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ materially from
our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following
important factors, among others, which could cause our results
to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted
or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:
|
|
i.
|
changes in the cost or availability of raw materials we use, in
particular pulpwood, market pulp, pulp substitutes, and abaca
fiber;
|
|
ii.
|
changes in energy-related costs and commodity raw materials with
an energy component;
|
|
iii.
|
variations in demand for, or pricing of, our products;
|
|
iv.
|
our ability to develop new, high value-added Specialty Papers
and Composite Fibers products;
|
|
v.
|
the impact of competition, changes in industry paper production
capacity, including the construction of new mills, the closing
of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or
productivity increases;
|
|
vi.
|
the gain or loss of significant customers
and/or
on-going viability of such customers;
|
|
vii.
|
cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup,
damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or
property damages related thereto, such as the costs of natural
resource restoration or damages related to the presence of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the lower Fox
River on which our former Neenah mill was located;
|
|
viii.
|
risks associated with our international operations, including
local economic and political environments and fluctuations in
currency exchange rates;
|
|
ix.
|
geopolitical events, including war and terrorism;
|
|
x.
|
enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other
legislation or changes in government policy or regulation;
|
|
xi.
|
adverse results in litigation;
|
|
xii.
|
our ability to successfully execute our timberland strategy to
realize the value of our timberlands; and
|
|
xiii.
|
our ability to finance, consummate and integrate future
acquisitions.
|
Introduction We manufacture, both domestically
and internationally, a wide array of specialty papers and
engineered products. Substantially all of our revenue is earned
from the sale of our products to customers in numerous markets,
including book publishing, envelope & converting,
carbonless papers and forms, food and beverage, decorative
laminates for furniture and flooring, and other highly technical
niche markets.
Overview Our results of operations in 2007,
when compared to 2006, reflect stronger performance from each of
our business units. Domestically, the Specialty Papers business
units results are positively influenced by the improved
productivity of the Chillicothe and Spring Grove facilities and
by additional volumes associated with the April 2006 Chillicothe
acquisition. This business units margins were adversely
impacted by increases in input costs that outpaced the rate of
increases in selling prices.
Our Composite Fibers business units results in 2007 was
positively influenced by additional volumes associated with the
Lydney acquisition that was completed in March 2006, as well as
improved mix. Average selling prices on a constant currency
basis improved in the comparison.
The comparison of year-to-date results are affected by the
completion of the business acquisitions referenced earlier which
includes: i) the $65 million acquisition of J R
Cromptons Lydney mill on March 13, 2006; and
ii) the $83.3 million acquisition
-13-
GLATFELTER
of Chillicothe, on April 3, 2006, the carbonless paper
operation of NewPage Corporation. In 2006, we incurred
acquisition integration costs totaling $13.6 million in
connection with the Chillicothe and Lydney acquisitions.
In connection with the Chillicothe acquisition, we ceased
production at our Neenah, WI facility effective June 30,
2006 and transferred production, including the production of
book paper, to Chillicothe. In 2006, we recorded shutdown
related charges totaling $54.4 million.
The results of operations in 2007 include $26 million of
pre-tax charges related to our estimated costs associated with
the Fox River environmental matter. The results also include
approximately $5.7 million of income tax benefits recorded
as a result of a change in the German corporate income tax rate.
During 2007 and 2006, we sold $87.3 million and
$17.1 million of timberlands, respectively, as part of our
timberland strategy.
As a result of significantly improved cash flows from operations
and from the use of timberland sales proceeds, net debt declined
$92.3 million, or 25%, since the end of 2006.
In April 2006, we refinanced our bank credit facility with a
$100 million term loan and a $200 million revolving
credit facility in addition to the issuance of $200 million
71/8%
bonds to replace our $150 million
67/8% notes
due July 2007.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
2007
versus 2006
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,148,323
|
|
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
156,312
|
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
118,818
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
63,472
|
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per diluted share
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 include the following
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
$
|
44,052
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental remediation
|
|
|
(15,979
|
)
|
|
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration costs
|
|
|
(1,569
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
|
8,812
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
(35,212
|
)
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition integration costs
|
|
|
(8,647
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt redemption premium
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These items increased earnings by $26.5 million, or $0.59
per diluted share in 2007. Comparatively, the items identified
above decreased earnings in 2006 by $36.7 million, or $0.82
per diluted share.
Business Units Results of individual business
units are presented based on our management accounting practices
and management structure. There is no comprehensive,
authoritative body of guidance for management accounting
equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America; therefore, the financial results of
individual business units are not necessarily comparable with
similar information for any other company. The management
accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure
performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined
from time to time as management accounting practices are
enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support
areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated
primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area
services or are included in Other and Unallocated in
the table above.
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units
before non-cash pension income, charges related to the Fox River
environmental reserves, restructuring related charges, unusual
items, certain corporate level costs, effects of asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this
is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance
of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of
business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core
operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption
Other and Unallocated. This presentation is closely
aligned with the management and operating structure of our
company. It is also on this basis that the Companys
performance is evaluated internally and by the Companys
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit Performance
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
In thousands, except tons
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
Other and Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$802,293
|
|
|
|
|
$693,660
|
|
|
|
$346,030
|
|
|
|
|
$292,751
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$1,148,323
|
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
811,738
|
|
|
|
|
704,386
|
|
|
|
346,030
|
|
|
|
|
292,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,157,768
|
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
721,216
|
|
|
|
|
635,143
|
|
|
|
287,606
|
|
|
|
|
246,797
|
|
|
|
(7,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
|
1,001,456
|
|
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
90,522
|
|
|
|
|
69,243
|
|
|
|
58,424
|
|
|
|
|
45,954
|
|
|
|
7,366
|
|
|
|
|
(9,903
|
)
|
|
|
156,312
|
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
|
56,561
|
|
|
|
|
50,285
|
|
|
|
32,541
|
|
|
|
|
28,458
|
|
|
|
27,042
|
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
116,144
|
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
33,961
|
|
|
|
|
18,958
|
|
|
|
25,883
|
|
|
|
|
17,496
|
|
|
|
58,974
|
|
|
|
|
(36,360
|
)
|
|
|
118,818
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
$33,961
|
|
|
|
|
$18,958
|
|
|
|
$25,883
|
|
|
|
|
$17,496
|
|
|
|
$34,090
|
|
|
|
|
$(58,682
|
)
|
|
|
$93,934
|
|
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tons sold
|
|
|
726,657
|
|
|
|
|
653,734
|
|
|
|
72,855
|
|
|
|
|
68,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
799,512
|
|
|
|
|
721,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
$34,882
|
|
|
|
|
$32,824
|
|
|
|
$21,119
|
|
|
|
|
$17,197
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$56,001
|
|
|
|
|
$50,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
Costs of Products Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$1,148,323
|
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
$161,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,157,768
|
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
160,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
1,001,456
|
|
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
109,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
$156,312
|
|
|
|
|
$105,294
|
|
|
|
$51,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales
|
|
|
13.6%
|
|
|
|
|
10.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated
net sales by each business unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales totaled $1.1 billion in 2007, an increase of
$161.9 million, or 16.4%, compared to the previous year.
In the Specialty Papers business unit, net sales increased
$108.6 million to $802.3 million and operating income
totaled $34.0 million, an increase of $15.0 million
over the previous year. The increase in net sales is
attributable to the Chillicothe acquisition that was completed
April 3, 2006 and an overall favorable pricing environment
that contributed a $16.1 million benefit in 2007 with
prices increasing in all product markets. Shipping volumes
increased 11% in the comparison. Specialty Papers
production costs increased in the comparison primarily due to
higher shipping volumes. Higher raw material prices largely
driven by energy, pulp and wood material usage adversely
impacted production costs by $19.2 million. These adverse
factors were partially offset by improved material usage and
machine yields.
In Composite Fibers, net sales were $346.0 million in 2007,
an increase of $53.3 million from the prior year and
operating income totaled $25.9 million, an increase of
$8.4 million in the comparison. The completion of the
March 13, 2006 Lydney acquisition accounted for
approximately $17.5 million of the increase in net sales
and the translation of foreign currencies benefitted net sales
by $19.6 million. On a constant currency basis, average
selling prices increased on average 0.3% and volumes increased
approximately 7% with increases realized in food and beverage,
technical specialties and metallized product markets. Energy and
raw material costs in this business unit were $3.2 million
higher than a year ago.
The reported amounts of costs of products sold in 2006 included
a $25.4 million charge for inventory write-downs and
accelerated depreciation on property and equipment abandoned in
connection with the Neenah facility shutdown. In the preceding
Business Unit Performance table, this amount is included in the
Other and Unallocated column.
Non-Cash Pension Income Non-cash pension income results
from the net over-funded status of our pension plans. The amount
of pension income recognized each year is determined using
various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors,
including the fair value of our pension assets as of the
beginning of the year. The following summarizes non-cash pension
income, before the curtailment charges recorded in connection
with the Neenah shutdown during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
$8,846
|
|
|
|
|
$15,480
|
|
|
|
$(6,634
|
)
|
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$12,896
|
|
|
|
|
$16,993
|
|
|
|
$(4,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses increased
$23.7 million in the year-to-year comparison and totaled
$116.1 million in 2007 compared to $92.5 million a
year ago. The increase
-15-
GLATFELTER
was due to a $26.0 million charge for the Fox River
environmental matter and the inclusion of a full years
results for the Chillicothe and Lydney acquisitions in the
current periods results. These unfavorable factors were
partially offset in the comparison by $12.2 million of
lower acquisition integration costs.
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and
Timberlands During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we
completed sales of timberlands. The following table summarizes
these transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
37,448
|
|
|
$
|
84,409
|
|
|
$
|
78,958
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
84,786
|
|
|
$
|
78,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
$
|
17,130
|
|
|
$
|
15,677
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,071
|
|
|
$
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with each of the asset sales set forth above, we
received cash proceeds with the exception of the sale of
approximately 26,000 acres of timberland completed in
November 2007. As consideration for the timberland sold in this
transaction we received a $43.2 million,
20-year
interest-bearing note due from the buyer, Glawson Investments
Corp. (Glawson), a Georgia corporation, and GIC
Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by
Glawson. The note receivable is fully secured by a letter of
credit issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Subsequent to
the end of 2007, we monetized this note receivable by pledging
it as collateral for a new $36.7 million term note payable.
Shutdown and Restructuring Charges Neenah
Facility Shutdown In connection with our
agreement to acquire the Chillicothe operations, we permanently
closed the Neenah, WI facility. Production at this facility
ceased effective June 30, 2006 and certain products
previously manufactured at the Neenah facility have been
transferred to Chillicothe. Results of operations in 2006
included charges totaling $54.4 million including the
$25.4 million charge to cost of goods discussed previously.
The remaining reserve as of December 31, 2006 associated
with this restructuring initiative totaled $2.8 million.
During 2007, we made payments totaling $1.7 million; thus,
the remaining reserve balance was $1.1 million at
December 31, 2007.
Non-operating income (expense) During April
2006, we completed the placement of a $200 million bond
offering, the proceeds of which were used to redeem the then
outstanding $150 million notes scheduled to mature in July
2007. In connection with the early redemption, a charge of
$2.9 million, related to a redemption premium and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, was recorded in
Consolidated Statement of Income as Non-operating expense under
the caption
Other-net.
Income taxes During 2007, we recorded income
tax expense totaling $30.5 million on pre tax income of
$93.9 million. The comparable amounts in 2006 were income
tax benefits of $10.0 million on a pre-tax loss of
$22.2 million. For 2007, income tax expense is net of a
$5.7 million deferred income tax benefit related to the
reduction of German corporate income tax rates passed into law
July 2007.
Foreign Currency We own and operate paper and
pulp mills in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the
Philippines. The functional currency in Germany and France is
the Euro, in the UK it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the
Philippines is the Peso. During 2007, Euro functional currency
operations generated approximately 19.9% of our sales and 18.8%
of operating expenses and British Pound Sterling operations
represented 7.6% of net sales and 7.8% of operating expenses.
The translation of the results from these international
operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. The table below summarizes the
impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange
rates in the current year period compared with the prior year
period had on our
non-U.S. based
operations from the conversion of these operations
non-U.S. dollar
denominated revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$19,563
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
(17,952
|
)
|
|
|
SG&A expenses
|
|
|
(1,927
|
)
|
|
|
Income taxes and other
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
-16-
GLATFELTER
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of
foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of
certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or
competing in multi-currency markets.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
2006
versus 2005
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted share
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 include the following
significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
|
$8,812
|
|
|
|
|
$0.20
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
(35,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.79
|
)
|
|
|
Acquisition integration costs
|
|
|
(8,647
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
Debt redemption premium
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sale of timberlands
|
|
|
$11,258
|
|
|
|
|
$0.26
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
12,719
|
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The above items increased earnings from continuing operations by
$36.7 million, or $0.82 per diluted share in 2006, and by
$23.0 million, or $0.53 per diluted share in 2005.
Business Units The following table sets forth
profitability information by business unit and the composition
of consolidated income from continuing operations before income
taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except tons
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
Other and Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$693,660
|
|
|
|
|
$380,923
|
|
|
|
$292,751
|
|
|
|
|
$198,137
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
704,386
|
|
|
|
|
391,001
|
|
|
|
292,751
|
|
|
|
|
198,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
635,143
|
|
|
|
|
340,629
|
|
|
|
246,797
|
|
|
|
|
166,153
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
69,243
|
|
|
|
|
50,372
|
|
|
|
45,954
|
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
(9,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
|
50,285
|
|
|
|
|
39,876
|
|
|
|
28,458
|
|
|
|
|
21,282
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
18,958
|
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
17,496
|
|
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
(36,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
48,985
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
$18,958
|
|
|
|
|
$10,496
|
|
|
|
$17,496
|
|
|
|
|
$10,702
|
|
|
|
$(58,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
$38,942
|
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tons sold
|
|
|
653,734
|
|
|
|
|
450,900
|
|
|
|
68,148
|
|
|
|
|
47,669
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
721,892
|
|
|
|
|
498,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
$32,824
|
|
|
|
|
$35,781
|
|
|
|
$17,197
|
|
|
|
|
$14,866
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$50,021
|
|
|
|
|
$50,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
Costs of Products Sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
$
|
407,290
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
407,938
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
399,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,176
|
|
|
$
|
8,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
10.7%
|
|
|
|
|
16.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated
net sales by each business unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Business Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
65.8
|
%
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales totaled $986.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, an increase of $407.3 million, or
70.3%, compared to the same period a year ago. Net sales from
the acquisition of Chillicothes carbonless and forms
business and the Lydney mill totaled $329.9 million. These
acquisitions are reported in the Specialty Papers and Composite
Fibers business units, respectively. Organic growth in Specialty
Papers was driven by a 4.0% increase in volume and
$21.3 million from higher average selling prices in the
Specialty Papers business unit. Excluding results of the Lydney
mill, Composite Fibers volumes shipped increased 15.6%.
The translation of foreign currencies unfavorably impacted this
business units net sales by $2.5 million and average
selling prices declined $3.5 million compared to the same
period a year ago.
In connection with the Chillicothe acquisition, we permanently
shutdown our Neenah, WI facility. Products previously
manufactured at the Neenah facility have been transferred to
Chillicothe. The
-17-
GLATFELTER
results of operations for 2006 include related pre-tax charges
of $54.4 million, of which $25.4 million is reflected
in the consolidated income statement as components of cost of
products sold and $29.0 million is reflected as
Shutdown and restructuring charges.
Costs of products sold totaled $891.8 million for 2006, an
increase of $399.8 million compared with the previous year
As discussed above, the 2006 costs of products sold includes a
$25.4 million charge for inventory write-downs and
accelerated depreciation on property and equipment abandoned in
connection with the Neenah shutdown.
In addition to the shutdown charges, the increase in costs of
products sold was primarily due to the inclusion of the
Chillicothe and Lydney acquisitions and the effect of increased
shipping volumes. In addition, higher raw material and energy
prices increased costs of products sold by approximately
$12.1 million.
Non-Cash Pension Income Non-cash pension
income results from the over-funded status of our pension plans.
The amount of pension income recognized each year is determined
using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors,
including the fair value of our pension assets as of the
beginning of the year. The following summarizes non-cash pension
income, before the curtailment charges recorded in connection
with the Neenah shutdown during 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
$15,480
|
|
|
|
|
$14,844
|
|
|
|
$636
|
|
|
|
SG&A expense
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
|
1,673
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$16,993
|
|
|
|
|
$16,517
|
|
|
|
$476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses totaled $92.5 million
in 2006 compared to $67.6 million a year ago. The increase
was due to $13.6 million of acquisition integration costs
and $16.2 million from the inclusion of the Chillicothe and
Lydney acquisitions in the current periods results of
operations. SG&A expenses in 2005 included a
$2.7 million charge for certain matters related to our
former Ecusta division. In addition, the comparison was
favorably affected by lower professional and legal fees in the
period to period comparison.
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and
Timberlands The following table summarizes the
assets sold in 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
$
|
17,130
|
|
|
$
|
15,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,071
|
|
|
$
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,327
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,778
|
|
|
$
|
22,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Recoveries During the 2006 and 2005,
we reached successful resolution of certain claims under
insurance policies related to the Fox River environmental
matter. Insurance recoveries included in the results of
operations totaled $0.2 million in 2006 and
$20.2 million in 2005. All recoveries were received in cash
prior to the end of the applicable period.
Shutdown and Restructuring Charges Neenah
Facility Shutdown As of June 30, 2006 we
permanently shutdown our Neenah facility. The charge incurred in
connection with this action was recorded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
$
|
25,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charge
|
|
|
29,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes shutdown reserve activity during
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beg.
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
and Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$22,466
|
|
|
|
$(22,466
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension curtailments and other retirement benefit charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and benefit continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
(6,026
|
)
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,367
|
|
|
|
(11,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
(1,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,399
|
|
|
|
(18,622
|
)
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$54,445
|
|
|
|
$(51,668
|
)
|
|
|
$2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Neenah facility supported our Specialty Papers business
unit. Shutdown of this facility resulted in the elimination of
approximately 200 positions.
As part of the Neenah shutdown, we terminated our long-term
steam supply contract, as provided for within the agreement,
resulting in a termination fee of approximately
$11.4 million.
-18-
GLATFELTER
The results of operations for 2006 and 2005, also include
$1.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of
charges related to the European Restructuring and Optimization
(EURO) Program.
Non-operating income (expense) During April
2006, we completed the placement of a $200 million bond
offering, the proceeds of which were used to redeem the then
outstanding $150 million notes scheduled to mature in July
2007. In connection with the early redemption, a charge of
$2.9 million, related to a redemption premium and the
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs, was recorded in
Consolidated Statement of Income as Non-operating expense under
the caption
Other-net.
Income taxes In 2006 we recorded an income tax
benefit at an effective rate of 45.0% compared to an income tax
provision at an effective rate of 35.8% in 2005. The beneficial
higher effective tax rate in 2006 was primarily due to the
effect of state tax law changes and the effect of tax credits,
partially offset by the resolution of certain tax matters.
Foreign Currency We own and operate paper and
pulp mills in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the
Philippines. The local currency in Germany and France is the
Euro, in the UK the British Pound Sterling, and in the
Philippines the currency is the Peso. During 2006, Euro
functional currency operations generated approximately 21.0% of
our sales and 19.8% of operating expenses and British Pound
Sterling operations represented 6.1% of net sales and 6.4% of
operating expenses. The translation of the results from these
international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
The table below summarizes the impact on reported results that
changes in currency exchange rates in the current year compared
with the prior year had on our
non-U.S. based
operations from the conversion of these operations
non-U.S. dollar
denominated revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Favorable
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$2,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
(4,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes and other
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(1,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of
foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of
certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or
competing in multi-currency markets.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant
expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, for environmental
compliance matters and to support our business strategy and
research and development efforts. In addition we have mandatory
debt service requirements of both principal and interest. The
following table summarizes cash flow information for each of the
years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
21,985
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,442
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for)
Operating activities
|
|
|
100,332
|
|
|
|
|
(28,427
|
)
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
4,733
|
|
|
|
|
(181,831
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(99,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided(used)
|
|
|
7,848
|
|
|
|
|
(35,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
29,833
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flow improved by $128.8 million in the
comparison primarily due to improved working capital usage and
improved operating results in 2007. The improvement in working
capital reflects the use in 2006 of $22.4 million
associated with the Lydney acquisition. In addition, cash used
for operations in 2006 included $21.7 million to settle a
cross currency rate swap, $17.6 million of income tax
payments and $18.6 million of cash paid for restructuring
charges.
The changes in investing cash flows primarily reflect the use of
approximately $158.4 million in 2006 to fund the Lydney and
Chillicothe acquisitions. Capital expenditures in the comparison
declined $15.5 million in the current year and totaled
$29.0 million. In 2008, capital expenditures are expected
to total $52 million to $57 million including a
$10 million investment to upgrade the capabilities of one
of our inclined wire paper machines in Germany.
During 2007 and 2006, cash dividends paid on common stock
totaled approximately $16.4 million and $16.0 million,
respectively. Our Board of Directors determines what, if any,
dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend payment
decisions are based upon then-existing factors and conditions
and, therefore, historical trends of dividend payments are not
necessarily indicative of future payments.
During 2007, net debt declined $92.3 million as proceeds
from operations and timberland sales were used to reduce debt
outstanding. In the year earlier period borrowings of
$158.4 million were used to finance the Lydney and
Chillicothe acquisitions.
The significant terms of the debt instruments are more fully
discussed in
Item 8-
Financial Statements,
-19-
GLATFELTER
Note 18. During 2007, $53 million of required
principal payments were made under our Term Loan. In 2008, we
are required to make $11 million of quarterly principal
repayments. In addition, on April 28, 2006, we completed a
private placement offering of $200 million aggregate
principal amount of our
71/8% Senior
Notes due 2016. We used the net proceeds to redeem
$150 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding
67/8% notes
due July 2007, plus the payment of the applicable redemption
premium and accrued interest. The following table sets forth our
outstanding long-term indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility, due April 2011
|
|
|
$35,049
|
|
|
|
|
$64,795
|
|
|
|
Term loan, due April 2011
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
71/8% Notes,
due May 2016
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
Note payable, due March 2013
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
312,049
|
|
|
|
|
394,795
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(11,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
$301,041
|
|
|
|
|
$375,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to December 31, 2007, we monetized a note
received as consideration from the sale of timberlands. In this
monetization, we entered into a new $36.7 million term loan
agreement (the 2008 Term Loan) with a financial
institution. The 2008 Term Loan matures in five years, bears
interest at a six-month reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a margin
rate of 1.20% per annum and is secured by, among other assets, a
$43.2 million note received from the buyers of certain
timberland sold in November 2007. For a more complete
description of the 2008 Term Loan, refer to Note 24.
We are subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation
by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental
authorities with respect to the environmental impact of mills we
operate, or have operated. To comply with environmental laws and
regulations, we have incurred substantial capital and operating
expenditures in past years. We anticipate that environmental
regulation of our operations will continue to be burdensome and
that capital and operating expenditures necessary to comply with
environmental regulations will continue, and perhaps increase,
in the future. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove
or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment resulting
from our operations, including the restoration of natural
resources and liability for personal injury and for damages to
property and natural resources. See Item 8
Financial Statements Note 20 for a summary of
significant environmental matters.
We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash needs from
a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents,
our existing credit facility and other long-term debt. However,
as discussed in Item 8 Financial
Statements Note 20, an unfavorable outcome of
various environmental matters could have a material adverse
impact on our consolidated financial position, liquidity
and/or
results of operations.
Our credit agreement, as amended, contains a number of customary
compliance covenants. In addition, the
71/8% Notes
contain a cross default provision that in the event of a default
under the credit agreement, the
71/8% Notes
would become currently due. As of December 31, 2007, we met
all of the requirements of our debt covenants.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had not entered into any
off-balance-sheet arrangements. Financial derivative instruments
to which we are a party and guarantees of indebtedness, which
solely consist of obligations of subsidiaries and a partnership,
are reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets
included herein in Item 8 Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations The following table
sets forth contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due During the Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 to
|
|
|
2011 to
|
|
|
2013 and
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
beyond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt(1)
|
|
|
$450
|
|
|
|
$31
|
|
|
|
$64
|
|
|
|
$71
|
|
|
|
$284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases(2)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
obligations(3)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long term
obligations(4),(5)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$663
|
|
|
|
$143
|
|
|
|
$102
|
|
|
|
$88
|
|
|
|
$330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents principal and interest
payments due on long-term debt. We have $200 million of
debt maturing in May 2016 and bearing a fixed rate of interest
at
71/8%,
payable semiannually and $34 million note maturing in March
2013 and bearing a fixed rate of interest of 3.82%. In addition,
at December 31, 2007, $35 million was outstanding
under our revolving credit facility and $43 million was
outstanding under a term loan. Both the revolving credit
facility and the term loan bear a variable interest rate (5.73%
as of December 31, 2007) and mature in April 2011.
|
(2)
|
|
Represents rental agreements for
various land, buildings, and computer and office equipment.
|
-20-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents open purchase order
commitments and other obligations, primarily for pulpwood
contracts with minimum annual purchase obligations. In certain
situations, prices are subject to variations based on market
prices. In such situations, the information above is based on
prices in effect at December 31, 2007 or expectations based
on historical experience and/or current market conditions.
|
(4)
|
|
Represents expected benefits to be
paid pursuant to medical retirement plans and nonqualified
pension plans over the next ten years.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Since we are not able to reasonably
estimate the timing of ultimate payment, the amounts set forth
above do not include any payments that may be made related to
uncertain tax positions, including potential interest, accounted
for in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 48. As
discussed in more detail in Item 8 Financial
Statements, Note 10, Income Taxes, such amounts
totaled $27.2 million at December 31, 2007.
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The
preceding discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial
position and results of operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories,
long-lived assets, pension and post-retirement obligations,
environmental liabilities and income taxes. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following represent the most significant and
subjective estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements.
Inventory Reserves We maintain reserves for
excess and obsolete inventories to reflect our inventory at the
lower of its stated cost or market value. Our estimate for
excess and obsolete inventory is based upon our assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. If actual market
conditions are more or less favorable than those we have
projected, we may need to increase or decrease our reserves for
excess and obsolete inventories, which could affect our reported
results of operations.
Long-lived Assets We evaluate the
recoverability of our long-lived assets, including plant,
equipment, timberlands and intangible assets periodically or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Our evaluations include
analyses based on the cash flows generated by the underlying
assets, profitability information, including estimated future
operating results, trends or other determinants of fair value.
If the value of an asset determined by these evaluations is less
than its carrying amount, a loss is recognized for the
difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the
asset. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor
operating results of the related business may indicate an
inability to recover the carrying value of the assets, thereby
possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement
Obligations Accounting for defined-benefit
pension plans, and any curtailments thereof, requires various
assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates,
expected rates of return on plan assets and future compensation
growth rates. Accounting for our retiree medical plans, and any
curtailments thereof, also requires various assumptions, which
include, but are not limited to, discount rates and annual rates
of increase in the per capita costs of health care benefits. We
evaluate these assumptions at least once each year or as facts
and circumstances dictate and make changes as conditions
warrant. Changes to these assumptions will increase or decrease
our reported income, which will result in changes to the
recorded benefit plan assets and liabilities.
Environmental Liabilities We maintain accruals
for losses associated with environmental obligations when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
legislation and remediation technologies. These accruals are
adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions
continue
and/or
further legal or technical information develops. Such
undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other
claims against third parties. Recoveries of environmental
remediation costs from other parties, including insurance
carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured
beyond a reasonable doubt.
Income Taxes We record the estimated future
tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our balance
sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards.
These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such
amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. We regularly
review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on
-21-
GLATFELTER
historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the
expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences and tax planning strategies. If we are unable to
generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a
material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period
within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable
or deductible, we could be required to increase the valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets, which may result in a
substantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material
adverse impact on our reported results.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide
provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and
liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are
many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
determination is less than certain. We and our subsidiaries are
examined by various Federal, State and foreign tax authorities.
We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations
and any future examinations for the current or prior years in
determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We
continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential
adjustments and adjust the income tax provision, the current
liability and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts
that give rise to a revision become known.
Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same
level of uncertainties as those discussed above, are
nevertheless important to an understanding of the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Refer to Item 8 Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional accounting
policies.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average principal outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fixed interest rates Bond
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$192,172
|
|
|
At fixed interest rates Note payable
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
31,081
|
|
|
At variable interest rates
|
|
|
72,543
|
|
|
|
60,160
|
|
|
|
46,401
|
|
|
|
13,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,049
|
|
78,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$312,049
|
|
$301,300
|
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate debt Bond
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
7.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate debt Note payable
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate debt
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above presents average principal outstanding and
related interest rates for the next five years. Fair values
included herein have been determined based upon rates currently
available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities.
Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in
interest rates and currency exchange rates. At December 31,
2007, we had long-term debt outstanding of $312.0 million,
of which $78.0 million or 25% was at variable interest
rates. Variable-rate debt outstanding represents borrowings
under our credit facility that incur interest based on the
domestic prime rate or a Eurocurrency rate, at our option, plus
a margin. At December 31, 2007, the interest rate paid was
5.73%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease
in the interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or
decrease annual interest expense by $0.8 million.
We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in
foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are
conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. During
2007, Euro functional currency operations generated
approximately 19.9% of our sales and 18.8% of operating expenses
and British Pound Sterling operations represented 7.6% of net
sales and 7.8% of operating expenses.
-22-
GLATFELTER
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of P. H. Glatfelter Company (the Company)
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. The Companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
under the supervision of the chief executive and chief financial
officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
Companys financial statements for external reporting
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
As of December 31, 2007, management conducted an assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Management has determined that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007 is effective to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of the Companys financial statements for
external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies
and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions
and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management; and provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets
that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing
herein, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.
The Companys management, including the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect
all errors and all frauds. A control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of
controls is based, in part, on certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks.
Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
-23-
GLATFELTER
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
P. H. Glatfelter Company
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
P.H. Glatfelter and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, of
the Company and our report dated March 12, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included
an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB No. 109 as of January 1,
2007.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2008
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
P. H. Glatfelter Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and
the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of P.
H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our
opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), as of December 31, 2006.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB No. 109 as of January 1, 2007.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated March 12, 2008, expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2008
-25-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
$1,148,323
|
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
1,157,768
|
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
|
|
1,001,456
|
|
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
156,312
|
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
116,144
|
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
Gains on disposition of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
118,818
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
Other nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
(29,022
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24,453
|
)
|
|
|
(13,083
|
)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
3,933
|
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other nonoperating expense
|
|
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
93,934
|
|
|
|
|
(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
60,140
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
30,462
|
|
|
|
|
(9,992
|
)
|
|
|
21,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
$63,472
|
|
|
|
|
$(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
45,035
|
|
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
44,013
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
45,422
|
|
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
44,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
$1.41
|
|
|
|
|
$(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
$0.88
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-26-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands, except par values
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
$29,833
|
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts: 2007
$3,117; 2006 $3,613)
|
|
|
|
|
122,980
|
|
|
|
|
128,255
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
193,042
|
|
|
|
|
192,281
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
27,557
|
|
|
|
|
32,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
|
373,412
|
|
|
|
|
375,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands net
|
|
|
|
|
519,866
|
|
|
|
|
528,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
393,789
|
|
|
|
|
321,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
$1,287,067
|
|
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
$11,008
|
|
|
|
|
$19,500
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
|
2,818
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
73,195
|
|
|
|
|
70,966
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
4,063
|
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
7,038
|
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
101,116
|
|
|
|
|
90,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
197,556
|
|
|
|
|
193,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
301,041
|
|
|
|
|
375,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
189,156
|
|
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
123,246
|
|
|
|
|
86,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
810,999
|
|
|
|
|
837,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized
120,000,000 shares; issued
54,361,980 shares (including shares in treasury:
2007 9,220,726;
2006 9,540,770)
|
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
|
|
44,697
|
|
|
|
|
42,288
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
563,608
|
|
|
|
|
519,489
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
|
|
|
(32,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612,910
|
|
|
|
|
529,984
|
|
|
|
Less cost of common stock in treasury
|
|
|
|
|
(136,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
(141,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
476,068
|
|
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
$1,287,067
|
|
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-27-
GLATFELTER
P.H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
$63,472
|
|
|
|
|
$(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash (used) provided by
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
56,001
|
|
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
50,647
|
|
|
|
Reserve for environmental matters
|
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension income
|
|
|
|
|
(12,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16,993
|
)
|
|
|
(16,517
|
)
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
37,066
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
8,004
|
|
|
|
|
(12,726
|
)
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
16,662
|
|
|
|
|
(17,622
|
)
|
|
|
(5,876
|
)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
|
|
|
(8,869
|
)
|
|
|
(6,195
|
)
|
|
|
Prepaid and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
(2,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
4,413
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
11,857
|
|
|
|
|
(36,422
|
)
|
|
|
(4,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by operations
|
|
|
|
|
100,332
|
|
|
|
|
(28,427
|
)
|
|
|
42,868
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for purchases of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
(28,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
(44,460
|
)
|
|
|
(31,024
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
41,616
|
|
|
|
|
21,071
|
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net of cash divested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
(7,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
(158,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
4,733
|
|
|
|
|
(181,831
|
)
|
|
|
(8,029
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
(30,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
43,522
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from other short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
(6,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
(995
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) net proceeds from $100 million term
loan facility
|
|
|
|
|
(53,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
94,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
|
|
(16,350
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
|
|
Net proceeds from $200 million
71/8% note
offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of $150 million
67/8
notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds and tax benefits from stock options exercised and other
|
|
|
|
|
7,551
|
|
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
(99,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
(15,158
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
7,848
|
|
|
|
|
(35,457
|
)
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
21,985
|
|
|
|
|
57,442
|
|
|
|
39,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
|
|
|
|
|
$29,833
|
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
$28,498
|
|
|
|
|
$26,218
|
|
|
|
$12,378
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
|
17,579
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-28-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
In thousands, except shares outstanding
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
41,828
|
|
|
$
|
525,056
|
|
|
|
$(1,275
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,768
|
|
|
$
|
(154,551
|
)
|
|
$
|
420,370
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,609
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax benefits of
$2,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,111
|
)
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,498
|
|
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,855
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,855
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock units, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Delivery of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options exercised net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
43,450
|
|
|
|
547,810
|
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
(5,343
|
)
|
|
|
(151,854
|
)
|
|
|
432,312
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,236
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to minimum pension liability prior to adoption of
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
Reversal of minimum pension liability under
SFAS No. 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,909
|
|
Additional net pension liability, net of tax benefit of $27,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,829
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,829
|
)
|
Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,085
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense RSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
Delivery of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
401(k) plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Employee stock options exercised net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,325
|
|
|
|
7,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
42,288
|
|
|
|
519,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,337
|
)
|
|
|
(141,616
|
)
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,472
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit plans net funded status, net of tax
benefit of $7,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,870
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,974
|
)
|
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,379
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
Delivery of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Employee stock options exercised net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
44,697
|
|
|
$
|
563,608
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
4,061
|
|
|
$
|
(136,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
476,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
-29-
GLATFELTER
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries
(Glatfelter) is a manufacturer of specialty papers
and engineered products. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania,
our manufacturing facilities are located in Spring Grove,
Pennsylvania; Chillicothe and Freemont, Ohio; Gloucestershire
(Lydney), England; Caerphilly, Wales, Gernsbach, Germany;
Scaër, France and the Philippines. Our products are
marketed throughout the United States and in over 85 other
countries, either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and
agents or directly to customers.
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Glatfelter and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated.
Accounting Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the
preparation of these consolidated financial statements are
reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known
circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ
from those estimates and assumptions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents We classify all
highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three
months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
or market. Raw materials and in-process and finished inventories
of our domestic manufacturing operations are valued using the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method, and the supplies inventories are valued
principally using the average-cost method. Inventories at our
foreign operations are valued using a method that approximates
average cost.
Plant, Equipment and Timberlands For financial
reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets. For income taxes purposes, depreciation is
primarily calculated using accelerated methods over lives
established by statute or U.S. Treasury Department
procedures. Provision is made for deferred income taxes
applicable to this difference.
The range of estimated service lives used to calculate financial
reporting depreciation for principal items of plant and
equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
10 45 Years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
7 35 Years
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4 40 Years
|
|
Maintenance and Repairs Maintenance and
repairs costs are charged to income and major renewals and
betterments are capitalized. At the time property is retired or
sold, the net carrying value is eliminated and any resultant
gain or loss is included in income.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill We
evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when a specific event
indicates that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability is assessed based on estimates of
future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual
disposition of the asset. If the sum of expected undiscounted
cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, the
assets fair value is estimated and an impairment loss is
recognized for any deficiencies. Goodwill is reviewed for
impairment on a discounted cash flow basis at least annually.
Impairment losses, if any, are recognized for the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Asset Retirement Obligations In accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations, as interpreted by Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 143
(FIN 47), we accrue asset retirement
obligations, if any, in the period in which obligations relating
to future asset retirements are incurred. Under these standards,
costs are to be accrued at estimated fair value, and a related
long-lived asset is capitalized. Over time, the liability is
accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is
depreciated over the useful life of the related asset for which
the obligation exists. Upon settlement of the liability, we
recognize a gain or loss for any difference between the
settlement amount and the liability recorded. Asset retirement
obligations with indeterminate settlement dates are not recorded
until such dates can be reasonably estimated. At
-30-
GLATFELTER
December 31, 2007, we do not have any obligations required
to be accrued under FIN 47.
Income Taxes Income taxes are determined using
the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in
accordance with SFAS No. 109. Under
SFAS No. 109, tax expense includes US and
international income taxes plus the provision for US taxes on
undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries not deemed
to be permanently invested. Tax credits and other incentives
reduce tax expense in the year the credits are claimed. Certain
items of income and expense are not reported in tax returns and
financial statements in the same year. The tax effect of such
temporary differences is reported in deferred income taxes.
Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not
that the assets will be realized in future years. We establish a
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which
realization is not likely.
Income tax contingencies are accounted for in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide
provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and
liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are
many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
determination is less than certain. We and our subsidiaries are
examined by various Federal, State and foreign tax authorities.
We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations
and any future examinations for the current or prior years in
determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We
continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential
adjustments and record any necessary adjustments in the period
in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
Treasury Stock Common stock purchased for
treasury is recorded at cost. At the date of subsequent reissue,
the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock
on the weighted-average cost basis.
Foreign Currency Translation Our subsidiaries
outside the United States use their local currency as the
functional currency. Accordingly, translation gains and losses
and the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions
designated as hedges of net foreign investments are included as
a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction
gains and losses are included in income in the period in which
they occur.
Revenue Recognition We recognize revenue on
product sales when the customer takes title and assumes the
risks and rewards of ownership. We record revenue net of an
allowance for customer returns and rebates.
Revenue from energy sales is recognized when electricity is
delivered to the customer. Certain costs associated with the
production of electricity, such as fuel, labor, depreciation and
maintenance are netted against energy sales for presentation on
the Consolidated Statements of Income. Costs netted against
energy sales totaled $10.2 million, $8.4 million and
$7.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Our current contract to sell
electricity generated in excess of our own use expires in the
year 2010 and requires that the customer purchase all of our
excess electricity up to a certain level. The price for the
electricity is determined pursuant to a formula and varies
depending upon the amount sold in any given year.
Environmental Liabilities Accruals for losses
associated with environmental obligations are recorded when it
is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing
legislation and remediation technologies. Costs related to
environmental remediation are charged to expense. These accruals
are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions
continue
and/or
further legal or technical information develops. Such
undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other
claims against third parties. Environmental costs are
capitalized if the costs extend the life of the asset, increase
its capacity
and/or
mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations.
Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other
parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets
when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income The
amounts reported on the consolidated Statement of
Shareholders Equity for Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income consist of $32.4 million of additional pension
liability; net of tax, and $36.5 million of gains from
foreign currency translation adjustments.
Stock-based Compensation Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment utilizing the modified
prospective method. This standard requires employee stock
options and other stock-based compensation awards to be
accounted for under the fair value method, and eliminates the
ability to account for these
-31-
GLATFELTER
instruments under the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB
Opinion No. 25, and allowed under the original provisions
of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. The adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R)
did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of
operation or financial position no stock options were granted in
2006 and 2005.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
common shares outstanding during the respective periods. Diluted
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the
weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of common
share equivalents is considered in the diluted earnings per
share computation using the treasury stock method.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The
amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other assets, and
short-term debt approximate fair value. The following table sets
forth carrying value and fair value of long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
312,049
|
|
|
$
|
301,300
|
|
|
|
$
|
394,795
|
|
|
$
|
398,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). The
Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and a
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax
position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon
examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is
measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than
50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. The cumulative effect adjustment of
$3.0 million was recognized as a reduction to retained
earnings.
The following table provides a breakdown of the incremental
effect of applying FIN 48 on individual line items in the
consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
Effect of
|
|
adoption of
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
FIN 48
|
|
FIN 48
|
|
FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
32,517
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
$32,710
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
90,482
|
|
|
|
(7,214
|
)
|
|
|
83,268
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
86,031
|
|
|
|
21,690
|
|
|
|
107,721
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
(11,309
|
)
|
|
|
171,350
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
519,489
|
|
|
|
(2,974
|
)
|
|
|
516,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective December 31, 2006 we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment to FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
132(R), (SFAS No. 158) which
requires entities to recognize the over funded or under funded
status of pension plans and other post retirement benefit plans.
In the year of adoption, the effect of recognizing additional
liabilities is affected through a charge to accumulated other
comprehensive income. Accordingly, the accompanying financial
statements include an after tax charge of $43.8 million in
2006 to adopt SFAS No. 158.
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, was issued. SFAS No. 157, which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measurement and
requires expanded disclosures about the fair value measurements,
is effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. We do not
expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In December 2007, SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations was issued. This statement establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree.
SFAS No. 141(R) also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination
and determines what information to disclose to enable users of
the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. It also changes the
recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising
from contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process
research and development at fair value, and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. With respect
to us, SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after January 1, 2009. We expect SFAS No. 141(R)
will have an impact on accounting for business combinations once
-32-
GLATFELTER
adopted but the effect is dependent upon acquisitions at that
time.
Metallised Products Limited On
November 30, 2007, through Glatfelter-UK Limited
(GLT-UK), a wholly-owned subsidiary, we completed
our acquisition of Metallised Products Limited
(MPL), a privately owned company that manufactures a
variety of metallized paper products for consumer and industrial
applications. MPL is based in Caerphilly, Wales.
Under terms of the agreement, we agreed to purchase the stock of
MPL for $7.2 million cash and assumed $5.8 million of
debt in addition to $1.4 million of transaction costs. The
purchase price is subject to adjustments based on working
capital and other factors. The acquisition was financed from our
existing cash balance. This facility employs about
165 people and had 2007 revenues of approximately
$53.4 million.
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the
purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$730
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less acquisition related liabilities including accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$8,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lydney On March 8, 2006, we entered into
a definitive agreement to acquire, through GLT-UK, certain
assets and liabilities of J R Crompton Limited
(Crompton), a global supplier of wet laid non-woven
products based in Manchester, United Kingdom. On
February 7, 2006, Crompton was placed into Administration,
the U.K. equivalent of bankruptcy.
Effective March 13, 2006, we completed our purchase of
Cromptons Lydney mill and related inventory, located in
Gloucestershire, UK for $65.0 million in cash in addition
to $4.2 million of transaction costs. The Lydney facility
employed about 240 people, produces a broad portfolio of
wet laid non-woven products, including tea bags and coffee
filter papers, double-sided adhesive tape substrates and battery
grid pasting tissue, and had 2005 revenues of approximately
$75 million. The purchase price was financed with existing
cash balances and borrowings under our credit facility.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase
price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$8,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less acquisition related liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$69,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe On April 3, 2006, we
completed our acquisition of Chillicothe, the carbonless
business operations of NewPage Corporation, for
$83.3 million in cash, in addition to approximately
$5.9 million of transaction and other related costs. The
Chillicothe assets consist of a paper making facility in
Chillicothe, Ohio with annual production capacity approximating
400,000
tons-per-year
and coating operations based in Fremont, Ohio with annual
revenue of approximately $440 million. The Chillicothe
acquisition was financed with borrowings under our credit
facility.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase
price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
$43,618
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
91,580
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension and other assets
|
|
|
11,416
|
|
|
|
Intangibles customer relationships
|
|
|
6,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,647
|
|
|
|
Less acquisition related liabilities including accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(65,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$89,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-Forma Financial Information The
information necessary to provide certain pro forma financial
data for the Chillicothe acquisition relative to net income and
earnings per share is not readily available due to the nature of
the accounting and reporting structure of the acquired operation
prior to the acquisition date. Pro forma consolidated net sales
for 2006 and 2005 were approximately $1.1 billion and
$1.0 billion, respectively, assuming the acquisition
occurred at the beginning of the respective periods. For the
full year 2005, on a pro forma basis, net income was
$40.9 million and diluted EPS was $0.92.
This unaudited pro forma financial information above is not
necessarily indicative of what the operating results would have
been had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the
respective period nor is it indicative of future results.
-33-
GLATFELTER
|
|
5.
|
NEENAH
FACILITY SHUTDOWN
|
In connection with our agreement to acquire the Chillicothe
operations, we committed to a plan to permanently close the
Neenah, WI facility. Production at this facility ceased
effective June 30, 2006 and certain products previously
manufactured at the Neenah facility have been transferred to
Chillicothe.
The remaining reserve as of December 31, 2006 associated
with this restructuring initiative totaled $2.8 million.
During 2007, we made payments totaling $1.7 million; thus,
the remaining reserve balance was $1.1 million at
December 31, 2007.
The following table summarizes shutdown reserve activity during
the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beg.
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
and cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
balance
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
payments
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated depreciation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,466
|
|
|
$
|
(22,466
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension curtailments and other retirement benefit charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675
|
|
|
|
(7,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
(33,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and benefit continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
(6,026
|
)
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
Contract termination costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,367
|
|
|
|
(11,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
(1,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,399
|
|
|
|
(18,622
|
)
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,445
|
|
|
$
|
(51,668
|
)
|
|
|
$2,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Neenah shutdown resulted in the elimination of approximately
200 positions that had been supporting our Specialty Papers
business unit. Approximately $25.4 million of the Neenah
shutdown related charges are recorded as part of costs of
products sold in the accompanying statements of income. The
amounts accrued for severance and benefit continuation are
recorded as other current liabilities in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. As part of the Neenah shutdown, we
terminated our long-term steam supply contract, as provided for
within the contract, resulting in a termination fee of
approximately $11.4 million as of the end of the second
quarter 2006.
European Restructuring and Optimization Program (EURO
Program) During the fourth quarter of 2005,
we began to implement this restructuring program, a
comprehensive series of initiatives designed to improve the
performance of our Composite Fibers business unit. In 2006 and
2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.2 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, associated with the related
work force efficiency plans at the Gernsbach, Germany facility.
This charge reflects severance, early retirement and related
costs for the affected employees. Payments related to these
restructuring charges will be made over a 2-3 year period.
|
|
7.
|
GAIN ON
DISPOSITIONS OF PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
|
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we completed sales of timberlands.
The following table summarizes these transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands
|
|
Acres
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
37,448
|
|
$
|
84,409
|
|
|
$
|
78,958
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
84,786
|
|
|
$
|
78,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
5,923
|
|
$
|
17,130
|
|
|
$
|
15,677
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
1,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,071
|
|
|
$
|
17,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timberlands
|
|
2,488
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,327
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,778
|
|
|
$
|
22,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the asset sales set forth above we received
cash proceeds with the exception of the sale of approximately
26,000 acres of timberland completed in November 2007. As
consideration for the timberland sold in this transaction we
received a $43.2 million,
20-year
interest-bearing note due from the buyer, Glawson Investments
Corp. (Glawson), a Georgia corporation, and GIC
Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by
Glawson. The note receivable is fully secured by a letter of
credit issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc.
The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted
earnings per share (EPS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$63,472
|
|
|
|
$(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in basic EPS
|
|
|
45,035
|
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
44,013
|
|
|
|
Common shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock options,
restricted stock awards and performance awards
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common share
equivalents used in diluted EPS
|
|
|
45,422
|
|
|
|
44,584
|
|
|
|
44,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
$1.41
|
|
|
|
$(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
$0.88
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the potential common shares
outstanding for stock options and restricted stock units that
were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the
period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Potential common shares
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
-34-
GLATFELTER
|
|
9.
|
GAIN ON
INSURANCE RECOVERIES
|
During 2006 and 2005, we reached successful resolution of
certain claims under insurance policies related to the Fox River
environmental matter. Insurance recoveries included in the
results of operations totaled $0.2 million and
$20.2 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, and were
received in cash.
Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or
refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax
returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on
enacted tax laws and rates.
Income taxes for 2007 include $5.7 million of tax benefit
adjustments related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets
and liabilities due to tax legislation enacted in July 2007 by
Germany that reduced the corporate income tax rate.
The provision for income taxes from operations consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
$8,388
|
|
|
|
|
$1,009
|
|
|
|
$14,881
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
4,422
|
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,207
|
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
18,511
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
11,766
|
|
|
|
|
(11,903
|
)
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
|
(2,970
|
)
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,185
|
)
|
|
|
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,255
|
|
|
|
|
(12,726
|
)
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
$30,462
|
|
|
|
|
$(9,992
|
)
|
|
|
$21,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts set forth above for total deferred taxes and other
include deferred taxes of $8.0 million,
$(12.7) million and $3.0 million at December 31,
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Other taxes totaled
$3.3 million at December 31, 2007 and related to
uncertain tax positions expected to be taken in future tax
filings.
The following are domestic and foreign components of pretax
income from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
$70,051
|
|
|
|
|
$(30,010
|
)
|
|
|
$55,865
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
23,883
|
|
|
|
|
7,782
|
|
|
|
4,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
$93,934
|
|
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the income tax provision, computed by
applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes and the actual income tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax provision at statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign income tax rate differential
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in statutory tax rates
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for tax matters, net
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
(45.0
|
)%
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sources of deferred income taxes were as follows at December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
current
|
|
|
Current
|
|
current
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
(Liability)
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
$10,301
|
|
|
|
$10,008
|
|
|
|
|
$8,239
|
|
|
|
$5,310
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
3,369
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
|
|
|
4,460
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
16,104
|
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
20,266
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
(109,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,686
|
)
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
(98,445
|
)
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
(88,719
|
)
|
|
|
Installment sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,701
|
)
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
(1,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
(5,293
|
)
|
|
|
Tax carry forwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
16,883
|
|
|
|
(176,860
|
)
|
|
|
|
17,789
|
|
|
|
(160,165
|
)
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,280
|
)
|
|
|
(12,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(22,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,603
|
|
|
$
|
(189,156
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
17,730
|
|
|
$
|
(182,659
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities are
included in the following balance sheet captions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
$16,982
|
|
|
|
$18,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
3,379
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
189,156
|
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, we had state and foreign tax net
operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of
$103.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively. These
NOL carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income,
if any. The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2008 and
2027; the foreign NOL carryforwards do not expire.
In addition, we had federal charitable contribution
carryforwards of $3.6 million, which expire in 2008 and
2011, federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of
$0.3 million, which expire in 2013, and various state tax
credit carryforwards totaling $0.4 million, which expire
between 2008 and 2020.
We have established a valuation allowance of $15.6 million
against the net deferred tax assets, primarily due to the
uncertainty regarding the ability to utilize state tax
carryforwards and certain deferred foreign tax credits.
Tax credits and other incentives reduce tax expense in the year
the credits are claimed. In 2007, we recorded tax credits of
$2.6 million related to Research and Development credits,
fuels tax, and the
-35-
GLATFELTER
electricity production tax credits. In 2006 and 2005 similar tax
credits of $1.8 million and $1.8 million,
respectively, were recorded.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, unremitted earnings of
subsidiaries outside the United States deemed to be permanently
reinvested totaled $92.5 million and $69.9 million,
respectively. Because the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries
are deemed to be permanently reinvested as of December 31,
2007, no deferred tax liability has been recognized in our
consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48 at which
time we had $20.7 million of gross unrecognized tax
benefits. If recognized, approximately $17.0 million would
be recorded as a component of income tax expense, thereby
affecting our effective tax rate. We accrue interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax
expense. As of January 1, 2007, we had accrued interest
related to unrecognized tax benefits of $1.0 million and we
had no accrued penalty expenses associated with uncertain tax
positions.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
$20.7
|
|
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
Increases in tax positions for current year
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
Lapse in statue of limitations
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
$26.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current year increase was primarily due to tax positions
taken or expected to be taken on certain state income tax
returns associated with timberland sales.
The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was
$22.3 million at December 31, 2007.
We, or one of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns with the
United States Internal Revenue Service, as well as various state
and foreign authorities. The following table summarizes tax
years that remain subject to examination by major jurisdiction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open Tax Year
|
|
|
Examination in
|
|
Examination not yet
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
progress
|
|
initiated
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
2005-2006
|
|
2004 and 2007
|
State
|
|
2004
|
|
2003 2007
|
Germany(1)
|
|
2003-2006
|
|
2007
|
France
|
|
N/A
|
|
2006 2007
|
United Kingdom
|
|
N/A
|
|
2006 2007
|
Philippines
|
|
2004 2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
includes provincial or
similar local jurisdictions, as applicable.
|
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits
by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often
result in proposed assessments. Management performs a
comprehensive review of its global tax positions on a quarterly
basis and accrues amounts for uncertain tax positions. Based on
these reviews and the result of discussions and resolutions of
matters with certain tax authorities and the closure of tax
years subject to tax audit, reserves are adjusted as necessary.
However, future results may include favorable or unfavorable
adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the
assessments are determined or resolved or as such statutes are
closed. Due to potential for resolution of Federal, state and
foreign examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of
limitation, it is reasonably possible our gross unrecognized tax
benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a
range of zero to $0.8 million.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions as income tax expense. Interest expense recognized in
2007 totaled $1.8 million. We did not record any penalties
associated with uncertain tax positions during 2007.
|
|
11.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
On April 25, 2005, shareholders approved the P. H.
Glatfelter 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (2005 Plan)
to authorize, among other things, the issuance of up to
1,500,000 shares of Glatfelter common stock to eligible
participants. The 2005 Plan provides for the issuance of
restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, non-qualified
stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and
performance units. As of December 31, 2007,
729,748 shares of common stock were available for future
issuance under the 2005 Plan.
During the 2007 and 2006, we recognized stock-based compensation
expense totaling $3.8 million and $2.3 million,
respectively, inclusive of matching 401K contributions. Since
the approval of the 2005 Plan we have issued to eligible
participants restricted stock units and stock only stock
appreciation rights.
-36-
GLATFELTER
Information with respect to each of these forms of stock-based
compensation follows:
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU) Awards of RSU are made under
our 2005 Plan. Under terms of the awards, the RSUs vest based
solely on the passage of time on a graded scale over a three,
four, and five-year period. The following table summarizes RSU
activity during the past three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
|
411,154
|
|
|
|
|
290,662
|
|
|
|
157,280
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
127,423
|
|
|
|
|
145,398
|
|
|
|
158,982
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(33,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24,906
|
)
|
|
|
(25,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
505,173
|
|
|
|
|
411,154
|
|
|
|
290,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense
|
|
|
$1,768
|
|
|
|
|
$1,107
|
|
|
|
$919
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant fair value per unit for awards in
2007, 2006 and 2005 was $15.32, $16.10 and $13.98 respectively.
As of December 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation expense
for outstanding RSUs totaled $2.8 million. The weighted
average remaining period over which the expense will be
recognized is 3.25 years.
Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Only Stock Appreciation
Rights (SOSARs) The following tables summarize
the activity with respect to non-qualified stock options and
SOSARS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Non-Qualified Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
$
|
14.06
|
|
|
|
|
1,553,209
|
|
|
$
|
14.06
|
|
|
|
2,098,612
|
|
|
$
|
14.65
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(105,190
|
)
|
|
|
13.78
|
|
|
|
|
(560,239
|
)
|
|
|
13.38
|
|
|
|
(111,542
|
)
|
|
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(100,750
|
)
|
|
|
17.07
|
|
|
|
|
(86,760
|
)
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
|
|
(433,861
|
)
|
|
|
17.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
700,270
|
|
|
|
13.81
|
|
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
|
14.17
|
|
|
|
1,553,209
|
|
|
|
14.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
700,270
|
|
|
$
|
13.81
|
|
|
|
|
906,210
|
|
|
$
|
14.17
|
|
|
|
1,547,422
|
|
|
$
|
14.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Non-Qualified Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
$10.78 to $12.41
|
|
|
159,570
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
12.07
|
|
|
|
159,570
|
|
|
|
12.07
|
|
|
|
12.95 to 14.44
|
|
|
319,900
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
13.36
|
|
|
|
319,900
|
|
|
|
13.36
|
|
|
|
15.44 to 17.16
|
|
|
196,300
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
196,300
|
|
|
|
15.47
|
|
|
|
17.54 to 18.78
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
17.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All options expire on the earlier of termination or, in some
instances, a defined period subsequent to termination of
employment, or ten years from the date of grant. The exercise
price represents the quoted market price of Glatfelter common
stock on the date of grant, or the average quoted market prices
of Glatfelter common stock on the first day before and after the
date of grant for which quoted market price information was
available if such information was not available on the date of
grant.
Under terms of the SOSAR, the recipients received the right to
receive a payment in the form of shares of common stock equal to
the difference if any, in the fair market value of one share of
common stock at the time of exercising the SOSAR and the strike
price. The SOSARs, which vest ratably over a three year period,
had a grant date fair value, estimated using the Black-Scholes
valuation model, of $4.63 per right, and an aggregate value of
$2.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
SOSARS
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
493,100
|
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(8,300
|
)
|
|
|
15.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
484,800
|
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
RETIREMENT
PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
|
We have both funded and, with respect to our international
operations, unfunded noncontributory defined-benefit pension
plans covering substantially all of our employees. The benefits
are based, in the case of certain plans, on average salary and
years of service and, in the case of other plans, on a fixed
amount for each year of service. U.S. Plan provisions and
funding meet the requirements of the Employee Retirement
-37-
GLATFELTER
Income Security Act of 1974. We use a December 31-measurement
date for all of our defined benefit plans.
We also provide certain health care benefits to eligible retired
employees. These benefits include a comprehensive medical plan
for retirees prior to age 65 and fixed supplemental premium
payments to certain retirees over age 65 to help defray the
costs of Medicare. The plan is not funded and claims are paid as
reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
378.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
316.3
|
|
|
|
$57.9
|
|
|
|
|
$48.3
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain)/loss
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
Chillicothe acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
373.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
378.7
|
|
|
|
$55.3
|
|
|
|
|
$57.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
579.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
471.6
|
|
|
|
$10.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
Chillicothe acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
603.6
|
|
|
|
|
579.0
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
$
|
230.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
|
$(45.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The net prepaid pension cost for qualified pension plans is
primarily included in Other assets, and the accrued
pension cost for non-qualified pension plans and accrued
post-retirement benefit costs are primarily included in
Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The amounts
set forth for Employer contributions for 2006
reflect a $12.2 million transfer from the qualified pension
plan assets to a post-retirement medical plan sub-account
pursuant to Section 420 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such
amounts are to be used to satisfy certain post-retirement health
care expenses.
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of
the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
259.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
230.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(29.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)
|
|
|
(45.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
230.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
200.3
|
|
|
|
$(45.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
The components of amounts recognized as Accumulated other
comprehensive income consist of the following on a pre-tax
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost/(credit)
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
$(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit
pension plans was $355.5 million and $366.7 million at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit
obligations above were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Discount rate benefit obligation
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
Future compensation growth rate
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) cost includes the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
$9.6
|
|
|
|
|
$6.0
|
|
|
|
$3.7
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(47.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(44.9
|
)
|
|
|
(39.4
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit income
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit income
|
|
|
$(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
$(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
$2.0
|
|
|
|
|
$1.7
|
|
|
|
$1.1
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
$4.1
|
|
|
|
|
$8.6
|
|
|
|
$4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss and prior service cost for our defined
benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over
the next fiscal year are $1.7 million and
$0.3 million, respectively.
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the net
periodic benefit (income) cost information above were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate benefit expense
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
Future compensation growth rate
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate benefit expense
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To develop the expected long-term rate of return assumption, we
considered the historical returns and
-38-
GLATFELTER
the future expected returns for each asset class, as well as the
target asset allocation of the pension portfolio.
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the
ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate rate
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one
percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates
would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage Point
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
increase
|
|
decrease
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
Total of service and interest cost components
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets Glatfelters pension plan
weighted-average allocations at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
by asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
Cash and fixed income
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Our objective is to achieve an above-market rate of return on
our pension plan assets. Based upon this objective, along with
the timing of benefit payments and the risks associated with
various asset classes available for investment, we have
established the following asset allocation guidelines:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
Fixed Income & Other
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate can be between 0% and 5% of the target equity
allocation. Glatfelter stock can also be between 0% and 5% of
the target equity allocation, although there were no holdings of
Glatfelter stock as of December 31, 2007 or 2006. Our
investment policy prohibits the investment in certain securities
without the approval of the Finance Committee of the Board of
Directors. Regarding Fixed Income securities, the
weighted-average credit quality will be at least AA
with a BBB minimum credit quality for each issue.
Cash Flow We do not expect to make
contributions to our qualified pension plans in 2008.
Contributions expected to be made in 2008 under our
non-qualified pension plans and other benefit plans are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified pension plans
|
|
$
|
2,189
|
|
|
|
Other benefit plans
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$27,985
|
|
|
|
$5,429
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
27,722
|
|
|
|
5,441
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
27,145
|
|
|
|
5,471
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
27,280
|
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
27,135
|
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
2013 through 2017
|
|
|
137,969
|
|
|
|
26,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Plans We maintain 401(k) plans for
certain hourly and salaried employees. Employees may contribute
up to 15% of their salary to these plans, subject to certain
restrictions. We will match a portion of the employees
contribution, subject to certain limitations, in the form of
shares of Glatfelter common stock. The expense associated with
our 401(k) match was $1.5 million, $1.2 million and
$0.6 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Inventories, net of reserves were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
$41,119
|
|
|
|
|
$38,539
|
|
|
|
In-process and finished
|
|
|
102,219
|
|
|
|
|
107,811
|
|
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
49,704
|
|
|
|
|
45,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$193,042
|
|
|
|
|
$192,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we had valued all inventories using the average-cost method,
inventories would have been $12.9 million and
$13.3 million higher than reported at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively. During 2007 and 2005 we liquidated
certain LIFO inventories, the effect of which did not have a
significant impact on results of operations.
|
|
14.
|
PLANT,
EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands at December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
$136,875
|
|
|
|
|
$135,836
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
960,133
|
|
|
|
|
911,964
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
90,448
|
|
|
|
|
86,606
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(680,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
(617,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,652
|
|
|
|
|
516,962
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
11,607
|
|
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
Timberlands, less depletion
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$519,866
|
|
|
|
|
$528,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
-39-
GLATFELTER
|
|
15.
|
GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The following table sets forth information with respect to
goodwill and other intangible assets which are recorded in the
caption Other assets in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Composite Fibers
|
|
|
$18,520
|
|
|
|
|
$15,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
$6,155
|
|
|
|
|
$5,958
|
|
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and related
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
|
4,659
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles
|
|
|
11,965
|
|
|
|
|
10,963
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
(638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangibles
|
|
|
$10,933
|
|
|
|
|
$10,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$1,032
|
|
|
|
|
$638
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition of MPL, we recorded
$2.2 million of goodwill. The balance of the increase in
goodwill was due to foreign currency translation adjustments.
The remaining weighted average useful life of intangible assets
was 10 years at December 31, 2007.
Other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
$259,445
|
|
|
|
|
$230,400
|
|
|
|
Installment notes receivable
|
|
|
81,020
|
|
|
|
|
37,850
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
29,453
|
|
|
|
|
25,523
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
23,871
|
|
|
|
|
27,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$393,789
|
|
|
|
|
$321,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
OTHER
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and benefits
|
|
|
$37,210
|
|
|
|
|
$34,790
|
|
|
|
Other accrued compensation and retirement benefits
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
Accrued rebates
|
|
|
19,707
|
|
|
|
|
17,849
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
28,041
|
|
|
|
|
28,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$101,116
|
|
|
|
|
$90,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility, due April 2011
|
|
|
$35,049
|
|
|
|
|
$64,795
|
|
|
|
Term Loan, due April 2011
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
|
|
71/8% Notes,
due May 2016
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
Note payable due March 2013
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
312,049
|
|
|
|
|
394,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(11,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
|
|
|
$301,041
|
|
|
|
|
$375,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
On April 3, 2006, we, along with certain of our
subsidiaries as borrowers and certain of our subsidiaries as
guarantors, entered into a credit agreement with certain
financial institutions. Pursuant to the credit agreement, we may
borrow, repay and reborrow revolving credit loans in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $200 million
outstanding at any time. All borrowings under our credit
facility are unsecured. The revolving credit commitment expires
on April 2, 2011.
In addition, on April 3, 2006, pursuant to the credit
agreement, we received a term loan in the principal amount of
$100 million. Quarterly repayments of principal outstanding
under the term loan begin on March 31, 2007 with the final
principal payment due on April 2, 2011.
Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest, at our
option, at either (a) the banks base rate described
in the credit agreement as the greater of the prime rate or the
federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, or (b) the
EURO rate based generally on the London Interbank Offer Rate,
plus an applicable margin that varies from 67.5 basis
points to 137.5 basis points according to our corporate
credit rating determined by S&P and Moodys.
We have the right to prepay the term loan and revolving credit
borrowings in whole or in part without premium or penalty,
subject to timing conditions related to the interest rate option
chosen. If certain prepayment events occur, such as a sale of
assets or the incurrence of additional indebtedness in excess of
$30.0 million in the aggregate, we must repay a specified
portion of the term loan within five days of the prepayment
event.
The credit agreement contains a number of customary covenants
for financings of this type that, among other things, restrict
our ability to dispose of or create liens on assets, incur
additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness, create liens
on assets, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or
consolidations. We are also required to comply with specified
financial tests and ratios, each as defined in the credit
-40-
GLATFELTER
agreement, including a consolidated minimum net worth test and a
maximum debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization (EBITDA) ratio. A breach of these
requirements, of which there were none at December 31,
2007, would give rise to certain remedies under the credit
agreement, among which are the termination of the agreement and
acceleration of the outstanding borrowings plus accrued and
unpaid interest under the credit facility.
This new credit facility replaced our prior credit facility
which would have matured in June 2006. A portion of the proceeds
from the new credit facility were used to finance the
Chillicothe acquisition.
On April 28, 2006, we completed an offering of
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
71/8% Senior
Notes due 2016. Net proceeds from this offering totaled
approximately $196.4 million, after deducting the
commissions and other fees and expenses relating to the offering
and were primarily to redeem $150.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our then outstanding
67/8% notes
due July 2007, plus the payment of applicable redemption premium
and accrued interest.
Interest on these Senior Notes accrues at the rate of
71/8%
per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and
November 1.
Prior to May 1, 2011, we may redeem all, but not less than
all, of the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, plus a make-whole premium. On or after
May 1, 2011, we may redeem some or all of the notes at
specified redemption prices. In addition, prior to May 1,
2009, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount
of the notes using the net proceeds from certain equity
offerings.
The
71/8% Senior
Note agreement contains a cross-default clause that
provides if there were to be an event of default under the
credit agreement discussed earlier, we would also be in default
under the
71/8% Senior
Notes.
On March 21, 2003, we sold approximately 25,500 acres
of timberlands and received as consideration a
$37.9 million
10-year
interest bearing note receivable from the timberland buyer. The
note receivable is recorded as Other assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. We pledged this note as
collateral under a $34.0 million promissory note payable to
SunTrust Financial (the Note Payable). The Note
Payable bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.82% and was
scheduled to mature in March 2008. In February 2008, we amended
the Note Payable to extend its maturity until March 26,
2013. In addition, the amendment provides that, beginning on
March 26, 2008, the Note Payable will bear a fixed rate of
interest to be based on the three month LIBOR plus 0.50% as of
March 24, 2008.
The following schedule sets forth the maturity of our long-term
debt during the indicated year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$11,008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
13,759
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
13,759
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
39,523
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
234,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees debt obligations of all
its subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these
consolidated financial statements.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had $14.1 million
and $8.1 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued
to us by a financial institution. Such letters of credit reduce
amounts available under our revolving credit facility. The
letters of credit provide financial assurances for
i) commitments made related to the Fox River environmental
matter, ii) for the benefit of certain state workers
compensation insurance agencies in conjunction with our
self-insurance program, and iii) assurance related to the
purchase of certain utilities for our manufacturing facilities.
We bear the credit risk on this amount to the extent that we do
not comply with the provisions of certain agreements. As of
December 31, 2007, no amounts were outstanding under the
letters of credit.
In January 2008, we entered into a $36.7 million term loan
agreement (the 2008 Term Loan) with SunTrust. The
2008 Term Loan matures in five years, bears interest at a
six-month reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a margin rate of 1.20% per
annum and is secured by, among other assets, a
$43.2 million note received from the buyers of certain
timberland sold in November 2007. For a more complete
description of the 2008 Term Loan, refer to Note 24.
The following table summarizes outstanding shares of common
stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
44,821
|
|
|
|
|
44,132
|
|
|
|
43,950
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares issued for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock performance awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) plan
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options exercised
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
45,143
|
|
|
|
|
44,821
|
|
|
|
44,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
-41-
GLATFELTER
|
|
20.
|
COMMITMENTS,
CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
Contractual Commitments The following table
summarizes the minimum annual payments due on noncancelable
operating leases and other similar contractual obligations
having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year. Other
contractual obligations primarily represent minimum purchase
commitments under energy and pulp wood supply contracts and
other purchase obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Leases
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$3,044
|
|
|
|
$86,011
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
16,541
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, required minimum annual payments due
under operating leases and other similar contractual obligations
aggregated $16.7 million and $102.6 million,
respectively.
Contingencies
Fox
River Neenah, Wisconsin
Background We have significant
uncertainties associated with environmental claims arising out
of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
in sediments in the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay.
As part of the 1979 acquisition of the Bergstrom Paper Company
we acquired a facility located at this site (the Neenah
Facility). In part, the Neenah Facility used wastepaper as
a source of fiber. At no time did the Neenah Facility utilize
PCBs in the pulp and paper making process, but discharges to the
lower Fox River from the facility which may have contained PCBs
from wastepaper may have occurred from 1954 to the late 1970s.
Any PCBs that the Neenah Facility discharged into the lower Fox
River resulted from the presence of PCBs in
NCR®-brand
carbonless copy paper in the wastepaper that was received from
others and recycled. We closed the Neenah Facility in June 2006.
As discussed below, various state and federal governmental
agencies have formally notified nine potentially responsible
parties (PRPs), including us, that they are
potentially responsible for response costs and natural
resource damages (NRDs) arising from PCB
contamination at the Lower Fox River and Green Bay Superfund
Site, Green Bay, Wisconsin (Site) under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) and other statutes. The other
identified PRPs are NCR Corporation, Appleton Paper Inc.,
Georgia Pacific Corp. (formerly Fort Howard Corp. and
Fort James O perating Company), WTM I Company (WTM
I, a subsidiary of Chesapeake Corp.), Riverside Paper
Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills Corp. (a subsidiary of Sonoco
Products Company), Sonoco Products Company, Menasha Corporation,
and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
The United States, on behalf of certain governmental
authorities, is pursuing responsible parties to remediate the
contaminated areas of the Site, to satisfy Natural Resource
Damage claims, and to reimburse the governmental authorities for
past costs. The areas of the lower Fox River and in the Bay of
Green Bay in which PCB contamination exists are commonly
referred to as Operable Unit 1 (OU1), which consists
of Little Lake Butte des Morts, the portion of the river that is
closest to the Neenah Facility, Operable Unit 2
(OU2), which is the portion of the river between
dams at Appleton and Little Rapids, and Operable Units 3 through
5 (OU3-5), an area approximately 20 miles
downstream from the Neenah Facility.
CERCLA establishes a two-part liability structure that makes
responsible parties liable for (1) response
costs or response actions associated with the
remediation of a release of hazardous substances and
(2) NRDs related to that release. Courts have interpreted
CERCLA to impose strict, joint and several liability on
responsible parties for response costs, subject to equitable
allocation in certain instances. Prior to a final settlement by
all responsible parties and the final cleanup of the
contamination, uncertainty regarding the application of that
liability will persist.
The following table summarizes the potential range of costs to
satisfy total claims associated with the Fox River matter based
on the best available estimates. Such amounts are not
necessarily indicative of our share of responsibility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
OU1
|
|
|
$93
|
|
|
|
|
$137
|
|
|
|
OU2 OU5
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
Natural Resource Damages (NRD)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU1 is currently the only area of the Site in which we, together
with WTM I, are conducting remediation activities. With
respect to OU1, the high end of the range set forth above
assumes dredging of contamination as opposed to the use of
alternative remedies. As discussed below, the revised final plan
provides for the use of an alternative remedial approach rather
than dredging as originally proposed and approved by the United
States. Based on discussions to date, we believe dredging the
entire OU1 is remote. To date, approximately $63 million of
-42-
GLATFELTER
escrowed funds have been spent on OU1 remediation. The range of
costs set forth above for OU2-5 is based on the United
States estimated cost of $390 million as set forth in
the amended ROD issued in June 2007 plus or minus a 30%
contingency factor. However, independent estimates of the cost
to complete the remediation of OU2-5 provided to us by other
parties indicate the costs likely to be incurred to remediate
this portion of the Site could total amounts significantly
greater than the United States estimate. The range of NRD
is based on recently obtained information that indicated
$76 million represents the best estimate of NRDs.
Reserves
for Fox River Environmental Liabilities
We have reserves for existing environmental liabilities and for
those environmental matters for which it is probable that a
claim will be made and for which the amount of the obligation is
reasonably estimable. The following table summarizes information
with respect to such reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Recorded as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental liabilities
|
|
|
$7.0
|
|
|
|
|
$5.5
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$27.0
|
|
|
|
|
$7.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to the amounts set forth above, the caption
environmental liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheet represents the current portion of our reserves.
Such classification is based on our best estimate as to when the
liability is expected to require the use of funds to settle the
underlying obligation. As discussed later in this disclosure,
during 2007, we recorded additional charges of
$26.0 million associated with the Fox River matter in our
results of operations.
The following summarizes the status of our potential exposure:
Response
Actions and Recent Activities
OU1 and OU2 On January 7, 2003, the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources (the Wisconsin DNR)
and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued
a Record of Decision (ROD) for the cleanup of OU1
and OU2. Subject to extenuating circumstances and alternative
solutions provided for in the ROD, the ROD requires the removal
of approximately 784,000 cubic yards of sediment from OU1 and no
active remediation of OU2. The ROD also requires the long term
monitoring of the two operable units. On July 1, 2003, WTM
I Company entered into an Administrative Order on Consent
(AOC) with EPA and the Wisconsin DNR regarding the
implementation of the Remedial Design for OU1.
In the first quarter of 2004, the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Wisconsin approved a consent decree
regarding OU1 (the OU1 Consent Decree). Under terms
of the OU1 Consent Decree, we and WTM I each agreed to pay
approximately $27 million, of which $25 million from
each was placed in escrow to fund response work at OU-1
(OU-1 Escrow Account). The remaining amount that the
parties agreed to pay under the Consent Decree includes payments
for NRD and NRD assessment and other past costs incurred by the
governments. In addition, the EPA agreed to contribute
$10 million from another settlement to the OU1 Escrow
Account for the OU1 cleanup. As a result of these contributions,
the total amount of funds initially available for remediation of
OU1 totaled $60 million.
The terms of the OU1 Consent Decree restrict the use of the
escrowed funds to qualifying remediation activities or
restoration activities at the lower Fox River site. The response
work is being performed by us and WTM I, with governmental
oversight, and funded by the funds placed in the OU1 Escrow
Account. Beginning in mid 2004, we and WTM I have performed
activities to remediate OU1, including, among others,
construction of de-watering and water-treatment facilities,
dredging of portions of OU1, dewatering of the dredged
materials, and hauling of the dewatered sediment to an
authorized disposal facility.
The terms of the OU1 Consent Decree include provisions to be
followed should the OU1 Escrow Account be depleted prior to
completion of the response work. In this event, each settling
company would be notified and be provided an opportunity to
contribute additional funds to the OU1 Escrow Account. Should
the OU1 Consent Decree be terminated due to insufficient funds,
each settling company would lose the protections contained in
the OU1 Consent Decree, and the governments may order one or
both parties to complete the required remedial activities for
OU-1. The governments may issue a similar order to a third party
or perform the work themselves and seek response costs from any
or all PRPs for the site, including us. If the OU1 Consent
Decree is terminated due to the insufficiency of the escrow
funds, we and WTM I would each remain potentially responsible
for the costs necessary to complete the remedial action.
-43-
GLATFELTER
Since the start of these activities in the third quarter of
2004, approximately 320,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment
has been dredged.
Recent activity In late 2006, Glatfelter and
WTM I jointly submitted a proposed Final Plan for the completion
of the remediation of OU1 (the Final Plan) to
Wisconsin DNR and EPA. The Final Plan proposed the use of
engineered capping of certain areas of the Site as opposed to
dredging sediment. Throughout 2007, we and WTM I engaged in
discussions with the government agencies concerning the Final
Plan. In the first quarter of 2007, after reviewing more refined
cost estimates for the OU1 remediation and our projected
estimates of the funds that would be available in the OU1 Escrow
Account to implement the Final Plan, we revised our cost
estimates to implement the Final Plan (including work already
performed). As a result of the revised cost estimate to complete
the remedy of OU1, we increased our reserve in the first quarter
of 2007 by $6.0 million. Further, we and WTM I agreed to
address a potential shortfall in the OU1 Escrow Account by
executing a supplement to the OU1 Consent Decree which provided
that we each would pay an additional $6.0 million into the
OU1 Escrow Account.
Subsequently, and as discussed below in June 2007 the agencies
issued an amended ROD for operable units (or OUs) 2-5 which
included the use of alternative remedies similar to, but more
extensive than, those in the proposed Final Plan. In addition,
during the third quarter of 2007 the agencies informed us that
they would require capping or dredging in large portions of OU1
that we and WTM1 had proposed in the Final Plan not to remediate
due to the relatively low levels of contamination. As a result,
we and WTM 1, in the fourth quarter of 2007, submitted a
proposed revised Final Plan to the agencies that was consistent
with the agencies new requirements (Revised Final Plan).
The estimated cost to implement the Revised Final Plan is higher
than that estimated to implement the Final Plan.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, EPA and WDNR proposed to amend
the OU1 ROD to adopt the Revised Final Plan. The agencies
estimated the cost to implement the Revised Final Plan to be
between $90 and $110 million. While the parties have
proceeded as if this amendment will be approved and EPA has
initiated the amendment process, EPA has not yet issued an
amended OU1 ROD.
In October 2007, we and WTM I reached an agreement with another
PRP, Menasha Corporation (Menasha) which requires
Menasha to deposit $7 million to the OU1 Escrow Account to
secure performance of the remediation work in OU1 that is
currently planned for 2008 (the PRPs Funds).
We have agreed with Menasha and WTM I to provide the funds
required to complete OU-1 on an interim basis, and there is no
agreement that the amounts individually paid by each party
either equal or exceed that partys fair or allocable share
of those costs. That agreement was memorialized in a Second
Agreed Supplement to the OU1 Consent Decree, filed in November
2007. However, claims between us and WTM may be barred by
statute and the OU1 Consent Decree, so any adjustment to our and
WTM Is relative allocable shares would have to come
through differential recoveries from other parties who have not
paid their fair or allocable share of the OU1 costs.
The United States and the State of Wisconsin have also demanded
that we and WTM enter into an amended OU1 Consent Decree that
commits us to complete the OU1 remedy without a budget
limitation. We are engaged in discussions with the United States
and the State of Wisconsin regarding their demand, but have not
yet reached an agreement with regard to completing the OU1
remediation.
Also in the third quarter 2007, we conducted a pilot project to
validate certain aspects of the Final Plan, including evaluating
the engineered capping and covering of contaminated areas in
OU1. The aggregate impact of the revised cost estimates to
implement the Revised Final Plan, the agreement with Menasha for
additional funding and the estimated cost impact of other
developments discussed above regarding the site, are reflected
in the additional $20 million charge taken in the third
quarter of 2007.
Based on information currently available to us, subject to
i) government approval of the Revised Final Plan;
ii) the successful negotiation of acceptable and cost
effective contracts to complete the proposed OU1 remediation
activities; and iii) efficient implementation of the
engineered cap and cover in designated areas of OU1 by our
remediation contractor, we believe the required OU1 remedial
actions can be completed for amounts reserved as of
December 31, 2007 together with earnings on the funds
currently on deposit in the escrow account and other assets
available.
OUs 3 5 In July 2003, the EPA and the
Wisconsin DNR issued a ROD (the OU3-5 ROD) for the
cleanup of OU3 5. The OU3-5 ROD calls for the
removal of 6.5 million cubic yards of sediment and certain
monitoring at an estimated cost of $324.4 million but
could, according to the OU3-5 ROD, cost within a range from
approximately $227.0 million to $486.6 million. The
most significant
-44-
GLATFELTER
component of the estimated costs is attributable to large-scale
sediment removal by dredging.
In 2004, NCR Corp. and Georgia Pacific Corp. entered into an
agreement with the United States EPA under which they agreed to
perform the Remedial Design for OU 3-5. After gathering samples
to perform the Remedial Design for OU 3-5, elevated
concentrations of PCBs were identified in sediments along the
west bank of OU4, just downstream of the DePere Dam in Brown
County, Wisconsin. Subsequently, in 2006, the United States
filed a proposed Consent Decree with the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, which the court
subsequently entered and under which NCR Corp. and
Sonoco-U.S. Mills agreed to perform certain response
actions regarding these sediments, on an expedited basis. During
2007, NCR Corp and Sonoco-U.S. Mills commenced this work.
Recent Activity In February 2007, we, along
with the eight other PRPs identified above, received a General
Notice Letter from the EPA requesting that each PRP advise the
EPA of their willingness to discuss their liability for the
costs to remediate OU2-5 (the governments now having demanded a
small amount of cleanup in the downstream end of OU2) and to
provide a good faith offer to settle by April 1, 2007.
Since the receipt of this letter, the PRPs have engaged in
discussions to explore a potential settlement of the asserted
claims. In an attempt to resolve their disputes concerning
allocation of liability, we, together with the other PRPs who
received the General Notice Letter, have agreed to participate
in non-binding mediation. The mediation, so far, has not
resulted in any agreement as to allocation but is continuing. We
do not know at this time whether an agreement will be reached
between the governments and any PRPs to complete the remediation
of OU2-5.
In June 2007, the EPA and the Wisconsin DNR issued an amended
ROD covering Operable Units 2-5 (the Amended OU2-5
ROD) that primarily, among other matters, expanded the
Remedial Design provided for under the original OU3-5 ROD to
include the use of engineered caps as an alternative to
dredging. The Amended OU3-5 ROD estimates the total projected
costs to be approximately $385 million.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, EPA issued a unilateral
administrative order (UAO) to us and to seven other
respondents: Appleton Papers, Inc., CBC Coating, Inc. (a party
related to Riverside Paper Corporation), Georgia-Pacific
Consumer Products, LP, Menasha Corporation, U.S. Paper
Mills Corp., and WTM I Company. That UAO required parties other
than us to take certain actions now to prepare for full-scale
dredging of OU3-5, and then requires all parties, beginning in
August 2008, to begin to implement the Amended OU2-5 ROD.
Natural Resource Damages Neither the ROD nor
the OU3-5 ROD place any value on claims for NRDs associated with
this matter. As noted above, NRD claims are distinct from costs
related to the primary remediation of a Superfund site.
Calculating the value of NRD claims is difficult, especially in
the absence of a completed remedy for the underlying
contamination. The State of Wisconsin, the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS), the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), four Indian
tribes and the Michigan Attorney General have asserted that they
possess NRD claims related to the lower Fox River and the Bay of
Green Bay.
In September 1994, FWS notified the then-identified PRPs that it
considered them potentially responsible for NRDs. The federal,
tribal and Michigan agencies claiming to be NRD trustees have
proceeded with the preparation of an NRD assessment. While the
final assessment has yet to be completed, the federal trustees
released a plan on October 25, 2000 that values NRDs for
injured natural resources that allegedly fall under their
trusteeship at between $176 million and $333 million.
We believe that the federal NRD assessment is technically and
procedurally flawed. We also believe that the NRD claims alleged
by the various alleged trustees are legally and factually
without merit.
The OU1 Consent Decree required that Glatfelter and WTM I each
pay the governments $1.5 million for NRDs for the Fox River
site, and $150,000 for NRD assessment costs. Each of these
payments was made in return for credit to be applied toward each
settling companys potential liability for NRDs associated
with the Fox River site.
Litigation Activity In response to the
issuance of the UAO in the fourth quarter of 2007, we filed a
motion for a case management order in the pending proceeding,
United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Co.,
No. 2:03-cv-949-LA,
in which the OU1 Consent Decree has been entered. That motion
observed that, in light of the United States issuance of
the UAO, the OU1 Consent Decree does not resolve some of the
claims asserted by the United States and the State of Wisconsin
in that law suit. Accordingly, that motion sought an order
establishing a procedure for litigating those claims, and
through which we could assert our defenses. The United States
and the State of Wisconsin opposed that motion. On
February 13, 2008, the Court issued an Order denying our
motion having concluded that the United States complaint
and the
-45-
GLATFELTER
associated OU1 Consent Decree referred only to cleanup
activities at OU1 and not the entire Site. We disagree and are
currently evaluating whether to appeal the Courts denial
of our motion.
During the first quarter of 2008, Appleton Papers, Inc., and NCR
Corporation terminated their tolling and forbearance agreements
with all other PRPs, and commenced a lawsuit against George A.
Whiting Paper Company (Whiting). Their lawsuit
against Whiting seeks allocation of all costs of response
incurred associated with lower Fox River contamination. At the
same time, Appleton Papers, Inc., and NCR Corporation sought and
obtained leave to add additional parties following the
termination of existing agreements with certain PRPs which
prohibited NCR from commencing litigation against those PRPs.
During the first quarter of 2008, NCR joined us and Menasha in
the Whiting lawsuit. We are currently reviewing the complaint in
Whiting lawsuit and intend to defend the lawsuit.
Reserves for the Fox River Site At
December 31, 2007, the OU1 Escrow Account balance totaled
$1.9 million none of which was allocable to our portion. In
addition to the Escrow Account balance, as discussed above,
Menasha has agreed to contribute $7 million to the Escrow
Account and we and WTM I each will provide an additional
$6 million towards OU1 remediation in 2008. Our committed
share is recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet
under the caption Environmental liabilities.
As a result of the recent developments concerning the Fox River
including: (i) our revised cost estimates for the Revised
Final Plan; (ii) developments in the ongoing PRP mediation
and discussions with other PRPs; and (iii) the then
anticipated issuance of the UAO by the United States; we
recorded an additional charge of $20 million in the third
quarter 2007 to satisfy both our obligations at OU1 and all
pending, threatened or asserted and unasserted claims against us
for the Fox River including our claimed liability for the
remediation of OU3-5. This additional charge represents our
current assessment of the ultimate costs to be incurred by us
associated with the Revised Final Plan and any settlement of
liability for NRDs and for remediation of OU 3-5. As of
December 31, 2007, our reserve for the Fox River
environmental liability totaled $27.0 million. Our reserve
includes amounts originally established in 2003 and adjustments
in the first and third quarter of 2007 increasing the liability
by $26 million offset by expenditures related to
remediation activities.
We believe that we have strong defenses to liability for
remediation of OU2-5 including the existence of ample credible
data that indicates that PCBs did not leave OU1 in
concentrations that could have caused or contributed to the need
for cleanup in OU2-5. Others, including the EPA and other PRPs,
disagree with us and, as a result, the EPA has issued a UAO to
us and to others to perform the OU2-5 work, NCR and Appleton
Papers have commenced the Whiting litigation and have joined us
and other litigation associated with the remediation of the Site
is likely. Even if we are not successful in establishing that we
are not liable for the remediation of OU2-5, we do not believe
that we would be allocated a significant percentage share of
liability in any equitable allocation of the remediation costs
and other potential damages associated with OU2 5.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not
include reserves for any future litigation or defense costs for
the Fox River, and because litigation has commenced, the costs
to do so could be significant.
Other than with respect to the OU1 Consent Decree, the amount
and timing of future expenditures for environmental compliance,
cleanup, remediation and personal injury, NRDs and property
damage liabilities cannot be ascertained with any certainty due
to, among other things, the unknown extent and nature of any
contamination, the response actions that may ultimately be
required, the availability of remediation equipment, and
landfill space, and the number and financial resources of any
other PRPs.
Other Information The Wisconsin DNR and FWS
have each published studies, the latter in draft form,
estimating the amount of PCBs discharged by each identified PRP
to the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay. These reports
estimate the Neenah Facilitys share of the volumetric
discharge to be as high as 27%. We do not believe the volumetric
estimates used in these studies are accurate because
(a) the studies themselves disclose that they are not
accurate and (b) the volumetric estimates contained in the
studies are based on assumptions that are unsupported by
existing evidence. We believe that our volumetric contribution
is significantly lower than the estimates set forth in these
studies. Further, we do not believe that a volumetric allocation
would constitute an equitable allocation of the potential
liability for the contamination. Other factors, such as the
location of contamination, the location of discharge, and a
partys role in causing discharge, must be considered in
order for the allocation to be equitable.
We previously entered into interim cost-sharing agreements with
four of the other PRPs, which provided for those PRPs to share
certain costs relating to scientific studies of PCBs discharged
at the Site
-46-
GLATFELTER
(Interim Cost Sharing Agreements). These interim
cost-sharing agreements do not establish the final allocation of
remediation costs incurred at the Site. Based upon our
evaluation of the volume, nature and location of the various
discharges of PCBs at the Site and the relationship of those
discharges to identified contamination, we believe our allocable
share of liability at the Site is less than our share of costs
under the Interim Cost Sharing Agreements.
We also believe that there exist additional potentially
responsible parties other than the nine PRPs who were issued the
General Notice Letter for OU2-5. For instance, certain of the
identified PRPs discharged their wastewater through public
wastewater treatment facilities, which we believe makes the
owners of such facilities potentially responsible in this
matter. We also believe that entities providing PCB-containing
wastepaper to each of the recycling mills are also potentially
responsible in this matter.
While the OU1 Consent Decree, as amended, provides a negotiated
framework for resolving both our and WTM Is liability for
the remediation of OU1, it may not completely resolve our
exposure at the Site. We note that EPA has issued a UAO to us
calling for further work, and Appleton Papers and NCR have
commenced the Whiting litigation that may become more
complicated and involve additional parties. We cannot predict
the magnitude or outcome of the Whiting litigation or any other
litigation related to this matter.
Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes Our
analysis of the range of reasonably possible outcomes is derived
from all available information, including but not limited to
official documents such as RODs, discussions with the United
States and other PRPs, as well as legal counsel and engineering
consultants. Based on our analysis of currently available
information and experience regarding the cleanup of hazardous
substances, we believe that it is reasonably possible that our
costs associated with the Fox River matter discussed herein may
exceed the amount of charges taken by amounts that may prove to
be insignificant or that could range, in the aggregate, up to
approximately $195 million, over a period that is
undeterminable but that could range beyond 15 years. We
believe that the likelihood of an outcome in the upper end of
the monetary range is significantly less than other possible
outcomes within the range and that the possibility of an outcome
in excess of the upper end of the monetary range is remote.
In our estimate of the upper end of the range of reasonably
possible outcomes for the Site, we have considered: (i) the
remedial actions agreed upon to date under the OU1 Consent
Decree; and (ii) the requirements of the Amended OU2-5 ROD.
We have also assumed successful implementation of the Amended
OU2-5 ROD, although at a significantly higher cost than
estimated in the Amended OU2-5 ROD. We have also assumed our
share of the ultimate liability to be 18%, which is
significantly higher than we believe is appropriate or than we
will incur, and that our ultimate liability for NRDs government
oversight costs and for reimbursement of expenses from other
parties, although reasonably possible, is unlikely to be
significant.
Based on currently available information, including actual
remediation costs incurred to date, we believe that the
remediation of OU1 as proposed in the Revised Final Plan can be
completed with available amounts in the OU1 Escrow Account, the
amounts committed to be funded and the amounts currently
reserved. Our assessment assumes that: 1) the Revised Final
Plan will be approved by the United States; 2) we and WTM I
successfully negotiate acceptable contracts to complete
remediation activities; and 3) the OU1 remediation
contractor will successfully implement the Revised Final Plan.
However, if we are unsuccessful in managing our costs to
implement the Revised Final Plan additional charges may be
necessary and such amounts could be material.
The OU1 Consent Decree does not address response costs necessary
to remediate the remainder of the Site and only addresses NRDs
and claims for reimbursement of government expenses to a limited
extent. Because CERCLA imposes strict joint and several
liability, uncertainty persists regarding our exposure with
respect to the remainder of the Fox River site.
In estimating both our current reserves for environmental
remediation at the Site, we have assumed that we will not bear
the entire cost of remediation and damages to the exclusion of
other known PRPs at the Site who are also potentially jointly
and severally liable. The ability of other PRPs to participate
has also been taken into account in preparing our estimates, and
is generally based on our evaluation of recent publicly
available financial information on each PRP, and any known
insurance, indemnity or cost sharing agreements between PRPs and
third parties.
In addition, our assessment is based upon the magnitude, nature,
location and circumstances associated with the various
discharges of PCBs to the river and the relationship of those
discharges to identified contamination. We will continue to
evaluate
-47-
GLATFELTER
our exposure and the level of our reserves, including, but not
limited to, our potential share of the costs and NRDs, if any,
associated with the Fox River site.
Summary Our current assessment is that we will
be able to manage these environmental matters without a
long-term, material adverse impact on the Company. These matters
could, however, at any particular time or for any particular
year or years, have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, liquidity
and/or
results of operations or could result in a default under our
loan covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our
reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations
related to these matters, that our share of costs
and/or
damages for these matters will not exceed our available
resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term,
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations. With regard to the Fox River
site, if we are not successful in managing the completion of the
remaining remedial work at OU1
and/or
should the United States seek to enforce the UAO for OU2-5
against us which requires us to either perform directly or
contribute significant amounts towards the performance of that
work, such developments could have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of
operations and may result in a default under our loan covenants.
Ecusta
Division Matters
At December 31, 2007, we had reserves for various matters
associated with our former Ecusta Division. Summarized below is
the activity in these reserves during the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ecusta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
Workers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Matters
|
|
|
Comp
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
7,202
|
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,611
|
|
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,436
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
|
$
|
1,913
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(903
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(4,669
|
)
|
|
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
7,202
|
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, Jan. 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
6,391
|
|
|
$
|
2,144
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
11,835
|
|
|
|
Accruals
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
8,105
|
|
|
$
|
1,913
|
|
|
$
|
3,300
|
|
|
$
|
13,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
With respect to the reserves set forth above as of
December 31, 2007, $3.7 million is recorded under the
caption Other current liabilities and
$3.3 million is recorded under the caption Other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
The following discussion provides more details on each of these
matters.
Background Information In August 2001,
pursuant to an acquisition agreement (the Acquisition
Agreement), we sold the assets of our Ecusta Division to
four related entities, consisting of Purico (IOM) Limited, an
Isle of Man limited liability company (Purico),
RF&Son Inc. (RF), RFS US Inc. (RFS
US) and RFS Ecusta Inc. (RFS Ecusta), each of
which is a Delaware corporation (collectively, the
Buyers).
In August 2002, the Buyers shut down the manufacturing operation
of the pulp and paper mill in Pisgah Forest, North Carolina,
which was the most significant operation of the Ecusta Division.
On October 23, 2002, RFS Ecusta and RFS US (the
Debtors) separately filed for bankruptcy under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy
cases were later converted to Chapter 7 proceedings.
Effective August 8, 2003, the assets of RFS Ecusta and RFS
US, which substantially consist of the pulp and paper mill and
related real property, were sold to several third parties
unrelated to the Buyers (the New Buyers).
Ecusta Environmental Matters Beginning
in April 2003, government authorities, including the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR), initiated discussions with us and the New
Buyers regarding, among other environmental issues, certain
landfill closure liabilities associated with the Ecusta mill and
its properties (the Ecusta Property). The
discussions focused on NCDENRs desire to establish a plan
and secure financial resources to close three landfills located
at the Ecusta Property and to address other environmental
matters at the facility. During the third quarter of 2003, the
discussions ended with NCDENRs conclusion to hold us
responsible for the closure of three landfills. Accordingly, we
established reserves approximating $7.6 million
representing estimated closure costs. In March 2004 and
September 2005, NCDENR issued us separate orders requiring the
closure of two of the three landfills at issue. We have
completed the closure of these two landfills and are in the
process of closing the third; in addition, we have accepted
responsibility for decommissioning a fourth landfill
(collectively, the Landfill Closure and Post-Closure
Obligations).
In September 2005 we established a $2.7 million reserve for
potential environmental liabilities associated with the Ecusta
Property relating to: (i) mercury releases from the
Electro-Chemical Building; (ii) contamination in and
operation of the aeration and stabilization basin (the
ASB), which is part of the Ecusta Propertys
wastewater treatment system; (iii) a previously closed ash
landfill (Brown #1
-48-
GLATFELTER
Landfill); and (iv) contamination in the vicinity of
a former caustic building.
On November 15, 2006, Olin Corporation (Olin),
a former owner of the Ecusta Property, filed a First Amended
Complaint against us in the United States District Court for the
Western District of North Carolina asking the court for a
declaratory judgment that under the terms of a Purchase
Agreement, Olin is not liable for certain environmental
contamination that occurred at the Ecusta Property during the
time period when Olin owned such facility. We answered and filed
a counterclaim against Olin, alleging claims for (i) fraud
and fraudulent omissions; (ii) negligent misrepresentation;
and (iii) violation of the North Carolina Unfair and
Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Specifically, we alleged that
Olin had knowledge of extensive environmental contamination at
the Ecusta Property, but that it had concealed this information
in the course of negotiating the sale of the property in 1985 to
our predecessor. The parties are currently engaged in the
discovery process. We intend to vigorously defend and prosecute
this action.
Recent Activities On January 25,
2008, we entered into a series of agreements (the DRV
Transaction) pursuant to which we transferred potential
liabilities for certain environmental matters at the Ecusta
Property to Davidson River Village, LLC (DRV), which
contemporaneously purchased the facility from the New Buyers. As
part of the DRV Transaction, DRV assumed, and indemnified us
for, liability arising from environmental matters and conditions
at the Ecusta Property with certain enumerated exceptions,
including the Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Obligations and
investigation and remediation (if necessary) of any pollutants
that may have migrated from the Ecusta Property to the Davidson
and French Broad Rivers (the River Areas), which
liabilities were retained by us.
DRVs assumption of liability and indemnification of us was
secured in a number of ways: (i) an escrow account in the
amount of $4.4 million, of which we contributed
$2.2 million, was established to pay for the estimated cost
of the assessment and remediation of
on-site
mercury contamination at the Ecusta Property; (ii) DRV
caused two irrevocable letters of credit totaling
$7.0 million to be issued by Bank of America in our favor;
and (iii) DRV purchased environmental insurance to cover up
to $11.4 million of potential remediation cost overruns and
$25 million of potential third party liability. Thus, in
consideration of the amount we contributed to the escrow account
and bearing a share of the cost of the insurance policies, our
potential liability for future claims with respect to the
previously disclosed environmental matters has been transferred
to DRV. Our reserve, at December 31, 2007, associated with
this matter was adequate to cover the amounts contributed
towards resolution of these matters.
With respect to the River Areas, we entered into two agreements
with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)
and/or
NCDENR. Specifically, we agreed to determine the nature and
extent of contamination and threat to the public health, welfare
or the environment caused by hazardous substances released from
the Ecusta Property to the River Areas and, if necessary, to
identify and evaluate remedial alternatives to prevent, mitigate
or remedy such a release. In the event the results of this study
indicates the existence of a material contamination, additional
activities may be required and further charges could be
necessary.
Workers Compensation Prior to
2003, we established reserves related to potential workers
compensation claims associated with the former Ecusta Division,
which at that time were estimated to total approximately
$2.2 million. In the fourth quarter of 2005, the North
Carolina courts issued a ruling that held us liable for
workers compensation claims of certain employees injured
during their employment at the Ecusta facility prior to our sale
of the Division. Since this ruling, we have made payments as
indicated in the reserve analysis presented earlier in this
Note 20.
In addition to the specific matters discussed above, we are
subject to loss contingencies resulting from regulation by
various federal, state, local and foreign governments with
respect to the environmental impact of our mills. To comply with
environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred substantial
capital and operating expenditures in past years. We anticipate
that environmental regulation of our operations will continue to
become more burdensome and that capital and operating
expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations
will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. In addition,
we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate the adverse
effects, if any, on the environment resulting from our
operations, including the restoration of natural resources and
liability for personal injury and for damages to property and
natural resources.
We are also involved in other lawsuits that are ordinary and
incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of these
lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we do not
expect that such lawsuits in the aggregate or individually will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, liquidity or results of operations.
-49-
GLATFELTER
|
|
21.
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
|
The following table sets forth profitability and other
information by business unit for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Papers
|
|
Composite Fibers
|
|
Other and Unallocated
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$802,293
|
|
|
|
|
$693,660
|
|
|
|
$380,923
|
|
|
|
$346,030
|
|
|
|
|
$292,751
|
|
|
|
$198,137
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
$1,148,323
|
|
|
|
|
$986,411
|
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
Energy sales, net
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
811,738
|
|
|
|
|
704,386
|
|
|
|
391,001
|
|
|
|
346,030
|
|
|
|
|
292,751
|
|
|
|
198,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
1,157,768
|
|
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
721,216
|
|
|
|
|
635,143
|
|
|
|
340,629
|
|
|
|
287,606
|
|
|
|
|
246,797
|
|
|
|
166,153
|
|
|
|
(7,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
9,903
|
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
|
|
1,001,456
|
|
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
90,522
|
|
|
|
|
69,243
|
|
|
|
50,372
|
|
|
|
58,424
|
|
|
|
|
45,954
|
|
|
|
31,984
|
|
|
|
7,366
|
|
|
|
|
(9,903
|
)
|
|
|
14,820
|
|
|
|
156,312
|
|
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
SG&A
|
|
|
56,561
|
|
|
|
|
50,285
|
|
|
|
39,876
|
|
|
|
32,541
|
|
|
|
|
28,458
|
|
|
|
21,282
|
|
|
|
27,042
|
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
116,144
|
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
Gain on insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
33,961
|
|
|
|
|
18,958
|
|
|
|
10,496
|
|
|
|
25,883
|
|
|
|
|
17,496
|
|
|
|
10,702
|
|
|
|
58,974
|
|
|
|
|
(36,360
|
)
|
|
|
48,985
|
|
|
|
118,818
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
$33,961
|
|
|
|
|
$18,958
|
|
|
|
$10,496
|
|
|
|
25,883
|
|
|
|
|
$17,496
|
|
|
|
$10,702
|
|
|
|
34,090
|
|
|
|
|
$(58,682
|
)
|
|
|
$38,942
|
|
|
|
$93,934
|
|
|
|
|
$(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
$60,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
$287,107
|
|
|
|
|
$315,556
|
|
|
|
$335,745
|
|
|
|
$232,759
|
|
|
|
|
$213,311
|
|
|
|
$143,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$519,866
|
|
|
|
|
$528,867
|
|
|
|
$478,828
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
17,395
|
|
|
|
|
36,484
|
|
|
|
21,413
|
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
|
7,976
|
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,960
|
|
|
|
|
44,460
|
|
|
|
31,024
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
34,882
|
|
|
|
|
32,824
|
|
|
|
35,781
|
|
|
|
21,119
|
|
|
|
|
17,197
|
|
|
|
14,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,001
|
|
|
|
|
50,021
|
|
|
|
50,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of individual business units are presented based on our
management accounting practices and management structure. There
is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for
management accounting equivalent to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore,
the financial results of individual business units are not
necessarily comparable with similar information for any other
company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and
allocations to measure performance of the business units.
Methodologies are refined from time to time as management
accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The
costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the
business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated
utilization of support area services.
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units
before non-cash pension income, charges related to the Fox River
environmental reserves, restructuring related charges, unusual
items, certain corporate level costs, effects of asset
dispositions and insurance recoveries because it believes this
is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance
of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of
business units and the extent of cash flow generated from core
operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption
Other and Unallocated. This presentation is closely
aligned with the management and operating structure of our
company. It is also on this basis that the Companys
performance is evaluated internally and by the Companys
Board of Directors.
Our North America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses
on papers for the production of high-quality hardbound books and
other book publishing needs, carbonless papers designed for
multiple end-uses, such as credit card receipts, forms and other
applications, envelope & converting markets and highly
technical customized products for the digital imaging, casting
and release, pressure sensitive, and several niche technical
specialty markets.
Composite Fibers, based in Gernsbach, Germany, focuses on
higher-value-added products, such as paper for tea bags and
coffee pods/pads and filters, decorative laminates used for
furniture and flooring, and metallized products used in the
labeling of beer bottles.
We sell a significant portion of our specialty papers through
wholesale paper merchants. No individual customer accounted for
more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in 2007, 2006 or
2005.
Our net sales to external customers and location of net plant,
equipment and timberlands are summarized below. Net sales are
attributed to countries based upon origin of shipment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant,
|
|
|
|
|
Plant,
|
|
|
|
Plant,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
|
|
Equipment and
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Timberlands Net
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Timberlands Net
|
|
Net sales
|
|
Timberlands Net
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
832,724
|
|
|
$
|
287,107
|
|
|
|
$
|
719,720
|
|
|
$
|
315,556
|
|
|
$
|
399,705
|
|
|
$
|
335,745
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
190,796
|
|
|
|
133,505
|
|
|
|
|
173,267
|
|
|
|
128,290
|
|
|
|
143,227
|
|
|
|
123,685
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
87,054
|
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
|
|
60,115
|
|
|
|
63,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
37,749
|
|
|
|
25,254
|
|
|
|
|
33,309
|
|
|
|
21,960
|
|
|
|
36,189
|
|
|
|
19,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,148,323
|
|
|
$
|
519,866
|
|
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
$
|
528,867
|
|
|
$
|
579,121
|
|
|
$
|
478,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
-50-
GLATFELTER
|
|
22.
|
GUARANTOR
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Our
71/8% Senior
Notes have been fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint
and several basis, by certain of our 100%-owned domestic
subsidiaries, PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., The
Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company, GLT International Finance, LLC,
Glatfelter Holdings, LLC and Glatfelter Holdings II, LLC.
The following presents our consolidating statements of income
and cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006
and 2005 and our consolidating balance sheets as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006. These financial statements
reflect P. H. Glatfelter Company (the parent), the guarantor
subsidiaries (on a combined basis), the non-guarantor
subsidiaries (on a combined basis) and elimination entries
necessary to combine such entities on a consolidated basis.
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
802,293
|
|
|
$
|
42,801
|
|
|
$
|
346,030
|
|
|
$
|
(42,801
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,148,323
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
811,738
|
|
|
|
42,801
|
|
|
|
346,030
|
|
|
|
(42,801
|
)
|
|
|
1,157,768
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
716,015
|
|
|
|
40,181
|
|
|
|
287,931
|
|
|
|
(42,671
|
)
|
|
|
1,001,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
95,723
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
156,312
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
80,112
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
34,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,144
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(78,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,685
|
)
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
15,334
|
|
|
|
79,536
|
|
|
|
24,078
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
118,818
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(26,980
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,022
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense) net
|
|
|
75,806
|
|
|
|
15,910
|
|
|
|
(5,939
|
)
|
|
|
(81,639
|
)
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
48,826
|
|
|
|
15,907
|
|
|
|
(7,978
|
)
|
|
|
(81,639
|
)
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
64,160
|
|
|
|
95,443
|
|
|
|
16,100
|
|
|
|
(81,769
|
)
|
|
|
93,934
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
35,992
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
(6,773
|
)
|
|
|
30,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
63,472
|
|
|
$
|
59,451
|
|
|
$
|
15,545
|
|
|
$
|
(74,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
63,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
693,661
|
|
|
$
|
36,432
|
|
|
$
|
292,750
|
|
|
$
|
(36,432
|
)
|
|
$
|
986,411
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
704,387
|
|
|
|
36,432
|
|
|
|
292,750
|
|
|
|
(36,432
|
)
|
|
|
997,137
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
647,877
|
|
|
|
33,340
|
|
|
|
247,041
|
|
|
|
(36,415
|
)
|
|
|
891,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
56,510
|
|
|
|
3,092
|
|
|
|
45,709
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
105,294
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
60,119
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
|
|
29,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,481
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
29,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,318
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
(15,960
|
)
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,394
|
)
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(30,716
|
)
|
|
|
16,551
|
|
|
|
14,276
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(20,942
|
)
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
(3,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,453
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense) net
|
|
|
22,643
|
|
|
|
14,767
|
|
|
|
(5,477
|
)
|
|
|
(29,802
|
)
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
14,304
|
|
|
|
(8,525
|
)
|
|
|
(29,802
|
)
|
|
|
(22,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(29,015
|
)
|
|
|
30,855
|
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
(29,819
|
)
|
|
|
(22,228
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(16,779
|
)
|
|
|
11,062
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
(6,183
|
)
|
|
|
(9,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,793
|
|
|
$
|
3,843
|
|
|
$
|
(23,636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-51-
GLATFELTER
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
$380,906
|
|
|
|
$34,334
|
|
|
|
$198,254
|
|
|
|
$(34,373
|
)
|
|
|
$579,121
|
|
|
|
Energy sales net
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
390,984
|
|
|
|
34,334
|
|
|
|
198,254
|
|
|
|
(34,373
|
)
|
|
|
589,199
|
|
|
|
Costs of products sold
|
|
|
326,433
|
|
|
|
33,101
|
|
|
|
167,157
|
|
|
|
(34,668
|
)
|
|
|
492,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
64,551
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
31,097
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
97,176
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
44,381
|
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
|
|
21,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,633
|
|
|
|
Shutdown and restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
(21,213
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,053
|
)
|
|
|
Gains from insurance recoveries
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
41,202
|
|
|
|
20,648
|
|
|
|
8,038
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
70,183
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,083
|
)
|
|
|
Other income (expense) net
|
|
|
16,697
|
|
|
|
8,231
|
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
|
(20,558
|
)
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
|
|
8,231
|
|
|
|
(3,683
|
)
|
|
|
(20,558
|
)
|
|
|
(10,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
47,169
|
|
|
|
28,879
|
|
|
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
60,140
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
8,560
|
|
|
|
11,956
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
(793
|
)
|
|
|
21,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
$16,923
|
|
|
|
$2,547
|
|
|
|
$(19,470
|
)
|
|
|
$38,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$6,693
|
|
|
|
$162
|
|
|
|
$22,978
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$29,833
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
257,804
|
|
|
|
277,958
|
|
|
|
37,008
|
|
|
|
(229,191
|
)
|
|
|
343,579
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands net
|
|
|
279,511
|
|
|
|
7,591
|
|
|
|
232,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519,866
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
749,913
|
|
|
|
212,513
|
|
|
|
(78,513
|
)
|
|
|
(490,124
|
)
|
|
|
393,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$1,293,921
|
|
|
|
$498,224
|
|
|
|
$214,237
|
|
|
|
$(719,315
|
)
|
|
|
$1,287,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
$319,516
|
|
|
|
$39,285
|
|
|
|
$64,423
|
|
|
|
$(225,668
|
)
|
|
|
$197,556
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
267,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,041
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
138,615
|
|
|
|
33,557
|
|
|
|
32,236
|
|
|
|
(15,252
|
)
|
|
|
189,156
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
92,681
|
|
|
|
14,310
|
|
|
|
8,489
|
|
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
|
123,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
817,853
|
|
|
|
87,152
|
|
|
|
139,148
|
|
|
|
(233,154
|
)
|
|
|
810,999
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
476,068
|
|
|
|
411,072
|
|
|
|
75,089
|
|
|
|
(486,161
|
)
|
|
|
476,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$1,293,921
|
|
|
|
$498,224
|
|
|
|
$214,237
|
|
|
|
$(719,315
|
)
|
|
|
$1,287,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-52-
GLATFELTER
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$10,227
|
|
|
|
$546
|
|
|
|
$11,212
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
234,038
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
114,983
|
|
|
|
(6,051
|
)
|
|
|
353,053
|
|
|
|
Plant, equipment and timberlands net
|
|
|
302,606
|
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
213,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,867
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,269,299
|
|
|
|
475,354
|
|
|
|
(153,452
|
)
|
|
|
(1,269,463
|
)
|
|
|
321,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$1,816,170
|
|
|
|
$498,928
|
|
|
|
$186,059
|
|
|
|
$(1,275,514
|
)
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
$157,029
|
|
|
|
$2,753
|
|
|
|
$36,375
|
|
|
|
$(2,867
|
)
|
|
|
$193,290
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
329,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,295
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
137,180
|
|
|
|
18,112
|
|
|
|
29,472
|
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
182,659
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
804,077
|
|
|
|
91,418
|
|
|
|
25,844
|
|
|
|
(835,308
|
)
|
|
|
86,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,427,802
|
|
|
|
112,283
|
|
|
|
137,470
|
|
|
|
(840,280
|
)
|
|
|
837,275
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
386,645
|
|
|
|
48,589
|
|
|
|
(435,234
|
)
|
|
|
388,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$1,816,170
|
|
|
|
$498,928
|
|
|
|
$186,059
|
|
|
|
$(1,275,514
|
)
|
|
|
$1,225,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$92,366
|
|
|
|
$(40,334
|
)
|
|
|
$48,300
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$100,332
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
(16,334
|
)
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
|
(11,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,960
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
41,041
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,616
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Lydney mill, Chillicothe and Caerphilly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investing activities
|
|
|
(16,135
|
)
|
|
|
39,950
|
|
|
|
(19,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,733
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
|
|
|
(71,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,572
|
)
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(16,350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,350
|
)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing activities
|
|
|
(80,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,371
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(3,534
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
11,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,848
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
10,227
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
11,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of period
|
|
|
$6,693
|
|
|
|
$162
|
|
|
|
$22,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$29,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-53-
GLATFELTER
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$(75,468
|
)
|
|
|
$23,795
|
|
|
|
$13,860
|
|
|
|
$9,386
|
|
|
|
$(28,427
|
)
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
(35,527
|
)
|
|
|
(957
|
)
|
|
|
(7,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,460
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
|
|
16,436
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,071
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net of cash dividend
|
|
|
(89,217
|
)
|
|
|
(69,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investing activities
|
|
|
(120,112
|
)
|
|
|
(53,746
|
)
|
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,831
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
|
|
|
199,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,476
|
)
|
|
|
(9,419
|
)
|
|
|
181,121
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing activities
|
|
|
191,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,476
|
)
|
|
|
(9,419
|
)
|
|
|
173,388
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(4,297
|
)
|
|
|
(29,949
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(35,457
|
)
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
14,524
|
|
|
|
30,495
|
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
57,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of period
|
|
|
$10,227
|
|
|
|
$546
|
|
|
|
$11,212
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$21,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Guarantors
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$28,694
|
|
|
|
$42,318
|
|
|
|
$(12,497
|
)
|
|
|
$(15,647
|
)
|
|
|
$42,868
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
(20,319
|
)
|
|
|
(1,094
|
)
|
|
|
(9,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,024
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
21,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net of cash dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investing activities
|
|
|
(20,264
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
12,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,029
|
)
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
|
Payment of dividends
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
|
|
(12,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,001
|
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing activities
|
|
|
(14,425
|
)
|
|
|
(12,001
|
)
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
15,421
|
|
|
|
(15,158
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2,189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(5,995
|
)
|
|
|
30,203
|
|
|
|
(6,491
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
20,399
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
18,881
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
39,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the end of period
|
|
|
$14,404
|
|
|
|
$30,615
|
|
|
|
$12,390
|
|
|
|
$33
|
|
|
|
$57,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-54-
GLATFELTER
|
|
23.
|
QUARTERLY
RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
In thousands, except per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
280,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,606
|
|
|
$
|
36,709
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,265
|
|
|
$
|
3,253
|
|
|
|
|
$(11,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
288,091
|
|
|
|
|
279,720
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
|
(20,722
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
291,859
|
|
|
|
|
277,489
|
|
|
|
46,880
|
|
|
|
|
37,903
|
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
287,384
|
|
|
|
|
268,596
|
|
|
|
43,923
|
|
|
|
|
41,393
|
|
|
|
50,409
|
|
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information set forth above includes the following, on an
after-tax basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges and Unusual Items
|
|
|
Gains on Sales of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands, and
Other Asset Sales
|
|
|
Environmental Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
$(17,864
|
)
|
|
|
$1,914
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$3,695
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,731
|
)
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
12,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
37,237
|
|
|
|
|
8,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 15, 2008, GPW Virginia Timberlands LLC
(GPW Virginia), an indirect wholly owned and
bankruptcy-remote subsidiary of ours, entered into a Term Loan
Agreement with SunTrust Bank (the Agent), pursuant
to which GPW Virginia borrowed $36.7 million on fully
secured basis (the Term Loan). The Term Loan bears
interest at a six month reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus a
margin rate of 1.20% per annum. Interest on the Term Loan is
payable semiannually. The principal amount of the Term Loan is
due on January 15, 2013, but GPW Virginia may prepay the
Term Loan, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The
bulk of the proceeds from the term loan are expected to be used
to pay down outstanding debt in accordance with our credit
facility.
The Term Loan is secured by all of the assets of GPW Virginia,
including, without limitation, (i) a
20-year note
(the GIC Note) in the principal amount of
$43.2 million, dated November 16, 2007, issued by GIC
Investments LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Glawson
Investments Corp., in connection with GICs purchase of
certain timberlands from the Company, (ii) an irrevocable
letter of credit supporting the GIC Note (the GIC Letter
of Credit) issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (the
L/C Issuer) and (iii) notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $9.2 million issued by the Company in
favor of GPW Virginia (the Company Notes). The Term
Loan requires mandatory prepayment in the event that the
maturity of the GIC Note is accelerated for any reason.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer,
after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)),
as of December 31, 2007, have concluded that, as of the
evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting.
Managements report on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
and the related report of our independent registered public
accounting firm are included in Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2007,
that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
In the course of completing our evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting we implemented certain changes and
enhancements to our controls.
-55-
GLATFELTER
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Directors The information with respect
to directors required under this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2008. Our board of directors has determined that,
based on the relevant experience of the members of the Audit
Committee, the members are audit committee financial experts
as this term is set forth in the applicable regulations of
the SEC.
Executive Officers of the
Registrant The information with respect to
the executive officers required under this Item is set forth in
Part I of this report.
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior
Financial Officers in compliance with applicable rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that applies to our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer and our principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions. A copy of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct is
filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and is available on our website, free of charge, at
www.glatfelter.com.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2008.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2008.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2008.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein
by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about
March 21, 2008.
Our Chief Executive Officer has certified to the New York Stock
Exchange that he is not aware of any violations by the Company
of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Consolidated Financial Statements as follows are included in
Part II, Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i.
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv.
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v.
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules (Consolidated) are included in
Part IV:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i.
|
|
|
Schedule II -Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Documents
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
(Filing)
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 21, 2006, among NewPage
Corporation, Chillicothe Paper Inc. and P. H. Glatfelter Company
|
|
2.1
|
|
February 21, 2006 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Agreement for Sale of Assets (Lydney), dated March 8, 2006, by
and among J R Crompton Limited, Nicholas James Dargan and
Willian Kenneth Dawson, as administrators and Glatfelter-UK
Limited and the Company
|
|
10
|
|
March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2007, between Metallised
Products Limited (MPL) and Glatfelter Lydney
Limited, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of P. H. Glatfelter
Company to acquire MPL, filed herewith. (the schedules have been
omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K and will be
provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated April 27, 1977, including restated
Articles of Incorporation, as amended by:
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i
|
.
|
|
Articles of Merger dated January 30, 1979
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated May 12, 1980
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated September 23,
1981
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated August 2, 1982
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated July 29, 1983
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vi
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated April 25, 1984
|
|
3(a)
|
|
1994 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated October 15,
1984
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1984 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
viii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated December 24,
1985
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1985 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ix
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated April 23, 1986
|
|
(3)
|
|
March 31, 1986 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated July 11, 1986
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1986 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xi
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated March 25, 1988
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1987 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated November 9,
1988
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1988 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xiii
|
.
|
|
Statement of Reduction of Authorized Shares dated April 24, 1989
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1989 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xiv
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated November 29, 1990
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1990 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xv
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated June 26, 1991
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1991 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xvi
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated August 7, 1992
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1992 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xvii
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated July 30, 1993
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xviii
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated January 26, 1994
|
|
3(b)
|
|
1993 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xix
|
.
|
|
Articles of Amendment dated December 20, 2007, filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended through January 26, 1994
(restated for the purpose of filing on EDGAR), filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
By-Laws as amended through December 18, 2007, filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2006, by and between the
Company and SunTrust Bank, as trustee relating to
71/8
Notes due 2016
|
|
4.1
|
|
May 3, 2006 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 22, 2006,
among Glatfelter Holdings, LLC, Glatfelter Holdings II, LLC, the
Existing Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and SunTrust Bank
relating to
71/8
Notes due 2016
|
|
4.3
|
|
September 22, 2006 Form S-4/A
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company Management Incentive Plan, effective
January 1, 1982, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 1994**
|
|
10(a)
|
|
2000 Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company 2005 Management Incentive Plan, adopted
as of April 27, 2005**
|
|
10.4
|
|
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,
as amended and restated effective April 23, 1998 and further
amended December 20, 2000**
|
|
10(c)
|
|
2000 Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
Description of Executive Salary Continuation Plan**
|
|
10(g)
|
|
1990 Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Management Pension Plan,
effective as of April 23, 1998**
|
|
10(f)
|
|
1998 Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company 1992 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive
Plan, as amended December 20, 2000**
|
|
10(g)
|
|
2000 Form 10-K **
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, adopted
as of April 27, 2005**
|
|
10.1
|
|
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
(A)
|
|
Form of Top Management Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate.**
|
|
10.2
|
|
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
(B)
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Award
Certificate**
|
|
10.3
|
|
April 27, 2005 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
|
P. H. Glatfelter Company Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors, effective as of April 22, 1998**
|
|
10(h)
|
|
1998 Form 10-K**
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H.
Glatfelter Company and George H. Glatfelter II, dated as of
March 7, 2008, filed herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P.
H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, dated as of
March 7, 2008 , filed herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-57-
GLATFELTER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description of Documents
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
(Filing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
(A)
|
|
Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements, filed
herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
|
|
Agreement between the State of Wisconsin and Certain Companies
Concerning the Fox River, dated as of January 31, 1997, among P.
H. Glatfelter Company, Fort Howard Corporation, NCR
Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc., Riverside Paper Corporation,
U.S. Paper Mills, Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. and the State of
Wisconsin
|
|
10(i)
|
|
1996 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2006, by and among the
Company, certain of the Companys subsidiaries as
guarantors, the banks party thereto, PNC Bank, National
Association, as agent for the banks under the Credit Agreement,
PNC Capital Markets LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC,
as joint arrangers and bookrunners, and Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC, as syndication agent
|
|
10.1
|
|
April 7, 2006 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
(A)
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Company, certain
of the Companys subsidiaries, certain lenders party
thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
agent for such lenders, dated April 25, 2006
|
|
10.1
|
|
Aug 7, 2007 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
(B)
|
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Company, certain
of the Companys subsidiaries, certain lenders party
thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
agent for such lenders, dated December 22, 2006
|
|
10.2
|
|
Aug 7, 2007 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
(C)
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Company, certain
of the Companys subsidiaries, certain lenders party
thereto and PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as
agent for such lenders, dated June 8, 2007*
|
|
10.3
|
|
Aug 7, 2007 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
|
|
Contract for the Purchase and Bargain Sale of Property, dated as
of December 16, 2002, by and among Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company
(a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant), the Conservation
Fund and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
|
|
10(o)
|
|
2002 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003, among GPW
Timberlands, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant)
and SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent
|
|
10.3
|
|
March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
(A)
|
|
First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated January 31,
2008, by and among GPW Timberlands, LLC, P.H. Glatfelter
Company and SunTrust Bank, as administrative agent, filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
|
|
Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action at
Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay site by and
among the United States of America and the State of
Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter Company and WTMI Company
(f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills, Inc.)
|
|
10.2
|
|
October 1, 2003 Form 8-K/A -- No. 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
(A)
|
|
Agreed Supplement to Consent Decree between United States of
America and the State of Wisconsin vs. P.H. Glatfelter Company
and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.), filed
herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
(B)
|
|
Second Agreed Supplement to Consent Decree between United States
of America and the State of Wisconsin vs. P.H. Glatfelter
Company and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.)
|
|
10.1
|
|
Nov 15, 2007 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(p)
|
|
|
|
Administrative Order for Remedial Action dated November 13,
2007; issued by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency.
|
|
10.2
|
|
Nov 15, 2007 Form 8-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q)
|
|
|
|
Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Executive Officers, filed
herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(r)
|
|
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation (effective January
1, 2005), filed herewith **
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(s)
|
|
|
|
Service Agreement, commencing on August 1, 2006, between the
Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and Martin Rapp**
|
|
10(r)
|
|
2006 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(t)
|
|
|
|
Retirement Pension Contract, dated October 31, 2007, between
Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and Martin Rapp,
filed herewith**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(u)
|
|
|
|
Form of Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Right Award Certificate**
|
|
10(s)
|
|
2006 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
|
|
Form of Top Management Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate**
|
|
10(t)
|
|
2006 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(w)
|
|
|
|
Timberland Purchase & Sale Agreement - Virginia
Timberlands, entered into by and among Glawson Investments
Corp., GIC Investments LLC and Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company,
dated and effective as of August 8, 2007
|
|
10.1
|
|
Nov 9, 2007 Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(x)
|
|
|
|
Term Loan Agreement dated January 15, 2008, among GPW Virginia
Timberlands LLC, certain lenders party thereto and SunTrust
Bank, in its capacity as agent for such lenders, filed herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial
Officers of Glatfelter.
|
|
14
|
|
2003 Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed
herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to
Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to
Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002,
filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of George H. Glatfelter II, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Confidential treatment has been
requested for certain portions thereof pursuant to a
confidential treatment request filed with the Commission on
August 7, 2007. Such provisions have been filed separately
with the Commission.
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan
|
-58-
GLATFELTER
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II
|
George H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ George H. Glatfelter II
George H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Principal Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ John P. Jacunski
John P. Jacunski
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ David C. Elder
David C. Elder
Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer
|
|
Controller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Kathleen A. Dahlberg
Kathleen A. Dahlberg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Nicholas DeBenedictis
Nicholas DeBenedictis
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Richard C. III
Richard C. III
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ J. Robert Hall
J. Robert Hall
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Ronald J. Naples
Ronald J. Naples
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Smoot
Richard L. Smoot
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2008
|
|
/s/ Lee C. Stewart
Lee C. Stewart
|
|
Director
|
|
|
-59-
GLATFELTER
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, George H. Glatfelter II, certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 of P. H.
Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter);
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report.
|
|
4.
|
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for Glatfelter and have:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
Glatfelter, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of Glatfelters disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
Glatfelters most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
Glatfelters internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
|
5. |
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to Glatfelters auditors and the audit
committee of the Glatfelters board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Glatfelters ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: March 13, 2008
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ George
H. Glatfelter II
|
George H. Glatfelter II
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-60-
GLATFELTER
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
I, John P. Jacunski, certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 of P. H.
Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter);
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
|
|
4.
|
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f))
for Glatfelter and have:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
Glatfelter, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of Glatfelters disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
Glatfelters most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
Glatfelters internal control over financial
reporting; and
|
|
|
5. |
Glatfelters other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to Glatfelters auditors and the audit
committee of the Glatfelters board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Glatfelters ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in Glatfelters
internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: March 13, 2008
John P. Jacunski
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
-61-
GLATFELTER
Schedule II
P. H.
GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
For Each
of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2007
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
Sales Discounts and Deductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
$3,613
|
|
|
|
|
$931
|
|
|
|
$2,364
|
|
|
|
$2,585
|
|
|
|
|
$2,045
|
|
|
|
$2,217
|
|
|
|
Provision (a)
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
Write-offs, recoveries and discounts allowed
|
|
|
(1,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(1,726
|
)
|
|
|
(5,195
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,795
|
)
|
|
|
(2,711
|
)
|
|
|
Other (b)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
$3,117
|
|
|
|
|
$3,613
|
|
|
|
$931
|
|
|
|
$4,345
|
|
|
|
|
$2,585
|
|
|
|
$2,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for doubtful accounts is included in
administrative expense and the provision for sales discounts and
deductions is deducted from sales. The related allowances are
deducted from accounts receivable.
(a) The amount in 2006 includes $1.8 million of
doubtful account allowances acquired in connection with the
Chillicothe and Lydney acquisitions.
(b) Relates primarily to changes in currency exchange
rates.
-62-
GLATFELTER