FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period ended from to
Commission File Number 1-9247
CA, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-2857434 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number) |
|
|
|
One CA Plaza
Islandia, New York
|
|
11749 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(631) 342-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act): Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Shares Outstanding |
Common Stock
par value $0.10 per share
|
|
as of January 28, 2008
513,391,903 |
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CA, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of CA, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2007, the related consolidated condensed statements of operations for the
three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated condensed
statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. These
consolidated condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the
consolidated condensed financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of CA, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated May 30, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed
balance sheet as of March 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
As discussed in Note A, Basis of Presentation to the consolidated condensed financial statements,
effective April 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
in an enterprises financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
February 5, 2008
1
Item 1.
CA,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities |
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
Trade and installment accounts receivable, net |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
Deferred income taxes current |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
Installment accounts receivable, due after one year, net |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $988 and $922, respectively |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Purchased software products, net |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
Federal and state income taxes receivable noncurrent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Deferred income taxes noncurrent |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Other noncurrent assets, net |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
10,144 |
|
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and loans payable |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages and commissions |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) current |
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
Financing obligations (collected) current |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Deferred maintenance revenue |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Taxes payable, other than income taxes payable current |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Federal, state and foreign income taxes payable current |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Deferred income taxes current |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
Deferred income taxes noncurrent |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) noncurrent |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Financing obligations (collected) noncurrent |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Federal, state and foreign income taxes payable noncurrent |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
No shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 1,100,000,000 shares authorized;
589,695,081 and 589,695,081 shares issued;
509,616,273 and 525,176,744 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 80,078,808 shares and 64,518,337 shares,
respectively |
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
10,144 |
|
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
2
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenue |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
2,274 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Software fees and other |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL REVENUE |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Costs of licensing and maintenance |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Amortization of capitalized software costs |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
Product development and enhancements |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Other expenses (gains), net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Restructuring and other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Charge for in-process research and development costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EXPENSES BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before interest and income taxes |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, inclusive of realized
loss on sale, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC INCOME PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares used in computation |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares used in computation |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
3
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Provision for (decrease in) deferred income taxes |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Non-cash stock based compensation expense and defined contribution plan |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Non-cash charge for purchased in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in trade and current installment accounts receivable, net |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Decrease in noncurrent installment accounts receivable, net |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
(Decrease) increase in deferred subscription revenue (collected) current |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
180 |
|
Decrease in deferred subscription revenue (collected) noncurrent |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in financing obligations (collected) current |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
(Decrease) increase in financing obligations (collected) noncurrent |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Decrease in deferred maintenance revenue |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Increase in taxes payable, net |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
Restructuring and other, net |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY CONTINUING OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, primarily goodwill, purchased software,
and other intangible assets, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
Settlements of purchase accounting liabilities |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
(Purchases) sales of marketable securities, net |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock (common stock) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
Debt repayments |
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt borrowings, net of debt issuance costs of $3 million and $1 million, respectively |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
Exercise of common stock options and other |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
BEFORE EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
4
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements of CA, Inc. (the Company)
have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on managements knowledge of current events
and actions it may undertake in the future, these estimates may ultimately differ from actual
results.
Operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008. For
further information, refer to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
Basis of Revenue Recognition:
The Company generates revenue from the following primary sources: (1) licensing software products;
(2) providing customer technical support (referred to as maintenance); and (3) providing
professional services, such as consulting and education. Revenue is recorded net of applicable
sales taxes.
The Company recognizes revenue pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position 97-2,
"Software Revenue Recognition, (SOP 97-2), issued by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, as amended by SOP 98-9 Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With
Respect to Certain Transactions. In accordance with SOP 97-2, the Company begins to recognize
revenue from licensing and supporting its software products when all of the following criteria are
met: (1) the Company has evidence of an arrangement with a customer; (2) the Company delivers the
products; (3) license agreement terms are fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or
uncertainties that may alter the agreement such that it may not be complete and final; and (4)
collection is probable.
Under the Companys subscription model, implemented in October 2000, software license agreements
typically combine the right to use specified software products, the right to maintenance, and the
right to receive unspecified future software products for no additional fee during the term of the
agreement. Under these subscription licenses, once all four of the above noted revenue recognition
criteria are met, the Company is required under GAAP to recognize revenue ratably over the term of
the license agreement.
For license agreements signed prior to October 2000, once all four of the above noted revenue
recognition criteria were met, software license fees were recognized as revenue generally when the
software was delivered to the customer, or up-front (as the contracts did not include a right to
unspecified software products), and the maintenance fees were deferred and subsequently recognized
as revenue over the term of the license. Under the Companys current business model, a relatively
small amount of the Companys revenue from software licenses is recognized on an up-front or
perpetual basis, subject to meeting the same revenue recognition criteria in accordance with SOP
97-2 as described above. Software fees from such licenses are recognized up-front and are reported
in the Software fees and other line in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
Maintenance fees from such licenses are recognized ratably over the term of the license and are
recorded on the Maintenance line in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. License
agreements whose software fees are recognized up-front do not include the right to receive
unspecified future software products. However, in the event such license agreements are executed
within close proximity or in contemplation of other license agreements that are signed under the
Companys subscription model with the same customer, the licenses together may be deemed a single
multi-element
agreement, and all such revenue is required to be recognized ratably and is recorded as
Subscription revenue in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
5
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Since the Company implemented its subscription model in October 2000, the Companys practice with
respect to newly acquired products with established Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (VSOE) of
fair value has been to record revenue initially on the acquired companys systems, generally under
a perpetual or up-front model; and, starting within the first fiscal year after the acquisition, to
enter new licenses for such products under its subscription model, following which revenue is
recognized ratably and recorded as Subscription revenue. In some instances, the Company sells
newly developed and recently acquired products on a perpetual or up-front model. The software
license fees from these contracts are presented as Software fees and other. Selling such
licenses under an up-front model may result in higher total revenue in a reporting period than if
such licenses were based on the Companys subscription model and the associated revenue recognized
ratably.
Maintenance revenue is derived from two primary sources: (1) the maintenance portion of combined
license and maintenance agreements recorded under the prior business model or newly developed and
recently acquired products sold on a perpetual or up-front model; and (2) stand-alone maintenance
agreements. Maintenance revenue from these types of agreements is recognized on the Maintenance
line item in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations over the term of the agreement.
Under the Companys prior business model, maintenance and license fees were generally combined into
a single license agreement. The maintenance portion was deferred and amortized into revenue over
the initial license agreement term. Some of these license agreements have not reached the end of
their initial terms and, therefore, continue to amortize. This amortization is recorded on the
Maintenance line item in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. The deferred
maintenance portion was determined using its fair value based on annual, fixed maintenance renewal
rates stated in the agreement. For license agreements entered into under the Companys subscription
model, maintenance and license fees continue to be combined; however, the maintenance is inclusive
for the entire term. The Company reports such combined fees on the Subscription revenue line
item in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
The Deferred maintenance revenue line item on the Companys Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
principally represents payments received in advance of maintenance services to be rendered.
Revenue from professional service arrangements is generally recognized as the services are
performed. Revenue from committed professional services that are sold as part of a subscription
license agreement is deferred and recognized on a ratable basis over the term of the related
software license. If it is not probable that a project will be completed or the payment will be
received, revenue recognition is deferred until the uncertainty is removed.
Revenue from sales to distributors, resellers, and value-added resellers (VARs) commences when all
four of the SOP 97-2 revenue recognition criteria noted above are met and when these entities sell
the software product to their customers. This is commonly referred to as the sell-through method.
Revenue from the sale of products to distributors, resellers and VARs that incorporates the right
for the end-users to receive certain unspecified future software products is recognized on a
ratable basis.
Additionally, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company decided that certain channel
or commercial products sold through tier two distributors will no longer entitle the customer to
receive unspecified future software products. As such, license revenue from these sales where the
Company has established VSOE for maintenance is recognized on a perpetual or up-front basis using
the residual method and is reflected as Software fees and other, with maintenance revenue being
deferred and recognized ratably.
For further information, refer to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
Cash Dividends:
In November 2007, the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per
share. The dividend totaled approximately $21 million and was paid on December 28, 2007 to
stockholders of
6
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
record at the close of business on December 14, 2007. In August 2007, the
Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share. The dividend
totaled approximately $21 million and was paid on September 26, 2007 to stockholders of record at
the close of business on September 12, 2007. In June 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share. The dividend totaled approximately $21
million and was paid on June 29, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of business on June
22, 2007.
In November 2006, the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per
share. The dividend totaled approximately $21 million and was paid on December 29, 2006 to
stockholders of record at the close of business on December 15, 2006. In September 2006, the
Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share. The dividend
totaled approximately $23 million and was paid on September 29, 2006 to stockholders of record at
the close of business on September 22, 2006. In June 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share. The dividend totaled approximately $23
million and was paid on June 30, 2006 to stockholders of record at the close of business on June
19, 2006.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities:
The Companys cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances are held in numerous
locations throughout the world, with approximately 61% residing outside the United States at
December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities included
approximately $99 million of commercial paper which was purchased with an original maturity of less
than 90 days. Marketable securities at December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007 were approximately $1
million and $5 million, respectively.
Restricted Cash:
The Companys insurance subsidiary requires a minimum restricted cash balance of $50 million. In
addition, the Company has other restricted cash balances, including cash collateral for letters of
credit. The total amount of restricted cash was approximately $61 million as of December 31, 2007
and March 31, 2007, and is included in the Other noncurrent assets line item in the Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets.
Statement of Cash Flows:
For the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, interest payments were $122 million
and $102 million, respectively, and income taxes paid were $170 million and $173 million,
respectively.
In November 2007, the Company concluded its previously announced $500 million Accelerated Share
Repurchase program (ASR) with a third-party financial institution. In June 2007, the Company paid
$500 million to repurchase shares of its common stock and received approximately 16.9 million
shares at inception. Based on the terms of the agreement between the Company and the third-party
financial institution, the Company received approximately 3.0 million additional shares of its
common stock at the conclusion of the program in November 2007 at no additional cost. The average
price paid under the ASR was $25.13 per share and total shares repurchased was approximately 19.9
million.
The $500 million payment under the ASR is included in the cash flows used in financing activities
section in the Companys Consolidated Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the nine-month period
ended December 30, 2007 and is recorded as treasury stock in the Stockholders Equity section of
the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet.
Non-cash financing activities for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 consisted
of treasury shares issued in connection with the following: share-based incentive awards issued
under the Companys equity compensation plans of approximately $38 million (net of approximately
$15 million of withholding taxes) and $28 million (net of approximately $7 million of withholding
taxes), respectively; the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan of approximately $32 million and
$38 million, respectively; and discretionary stock contributions to the CA, Inc. Savings Harvest
Plan of approximately $22 million and $0, respectively.
7
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Derivatives:
Derivatives are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133).
Periodically, as part of the Companys on-going risk management program, the Company enters into
derivative contracts with the intent of mitigating a certain portion of the Companys operating
exposures, which could include its exposure to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and
liabilities and forecasted transactions. During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company
did not designate these as hedges under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, all outstanding derivatives are
recognized on the balance sheet at fair value and the changes in fair value from these contracts
are recorded as Other expenses (gains), net in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Operations.
At December 31, 2007, derivatives with a total notional value of approximately $172 million were
outstanding. Principal currencies hedged include the Euro, Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, British
Pound and the Australian Dollar. The derivative contracts that were entered into during the third
quarter of fiscal year 2008 resulted in a realized loss of approximately $3 million. Unrealized
gains on outstanding derivative contracts as of December 31, 2007 were less than $1 million. These
results are included in the Other expenses (gains), net line item in the Consolidated Condensed
Statement of Operations. The derivatives outstanding at the end of December 31, 2007 will mature
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, the
Company entered into similar derivative contracts as those entered during the third quarter of
fiscal year 2008 relating to the Companys operating exposures.
Concentration of Credit Risk:
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist
primarily of accounts receivable. Amounts included in accounts receivable expected to be collected
from customers, as disclosed in Note E, Trade and Installment Accounts Receivable, have limited
exposure to concentration of credit risk due to the diverse customer base and geographic areas
covered by operations. Unbilled amounts due under the Companys prior business model that are
expected to be collected from customers include one large IT outsourcer with a license arrangement
that extends through fiscal year 2012 with a net unbilled receivable balance of approximately $324
million.
New Revolving Credit Facility:
In August 2007, the Company entered into a new unsecured revolving credit facility (the 2008
Revolving Credit Facility). The maximum committed amount available under the 2008 Revolving Credit
Facility is $1.0 billion, exclusive of incremental credit increases of up to an additional $500
million which are available subject to certain conditions and the agreement of the Companys
lenders. The 2008 Revolving Credit Facility replaced a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (the
2004 Revolving Credit Facility) that was due to expire on December 2, 2008; that credit facility
was terminated effective August 29, 2007, at which time outstanding borrowings of $750 million were
repaid and simultaneously re-borrowed under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility. The 2008 Revolving
Credit Facility expires August 29, 2012. As of December 31, 2007, $750 million was outstanding
under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility. This amount is included in the Long-term debt, net of
current portion line item on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet.
Senior Notes Due 2014:
On December 21, 2007, a Settlement Agreement was entered in connection with the lawsuit captioned
The Bank of New York v. CA, Inc. et al., which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, New York County in which the Company agreed to pay supplemental interest on the 5.625%
Senior Notes due 2014 at a rate of 0.50% per annum, bringing the total interest rate on such notes
to 6.125% per annum. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $14 million during the third
quarter of fiscal year 2008 relating to this Settlement Agreement. The charge, representing the
present value of additional
8
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
amounts that will be paid on the Notes under the Settlement Agreement,
is included in the Other expenses (gains), net line item in the Consolidated Condensed Statement
of Operations. The related liability is recorded on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2007 in Accrued expenses and
other current liabilities for approximately $3 million, and in Other noncurrent liabilities for
approximately $11 million. As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Company is no longer required
to register the Notes. For further information, refer to Note J, Commitments and Contingencies,
in this Quarterly Form 10-Q Report.
Adoption of new accounting principle:
On April 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
"Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
48). Among other things, FIN 48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for the recognition
and derecognition of tax positions, provides guidance on the accounting for interest and penalties
relating to tax positions and requires that the cumulative effect of applying the provisions of
FIN 48 shall be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings or other
appropriate components of equity or net assets in the statement of financial position. Refer to
Note I, Income Taxes, for additional information relating to the Companys accounting for FIN 48
and income taxes.
Reclassification and revisions:
Statement of Operations: Effective with the filing of this third quarter of fiscal year
2008 10-Q Report, the Company revised its Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations in order
to provide further clarity into its financial results. The Company has modified its financial
statements to identify certain costs of sales on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Operations. The Company continues to report Amortization of capitalized software costs and Costs
of professional services as separate line items on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Operations and has now added a new line item entitled Costs of licensing and maintenance. Costs
of licensing and maintenance includes technical support costs (previously reported as part of
Product development and enhancements), royalties (previously reported as part of Commissions,
royalties and bonuses), and other manufacturing and distribution costs (previously included within
Selling, general, and administrative). The remaining amounts previously reported under
Commissions, royalties and bonuses have been included with Selling, general and administrative
expenses. To maintain consistency and comparability, the Company reclassified prior-year amounts
to conform to the current-year Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations presentation. These
expense reclassifications had no effect on previously reported total expenses or total revenue.
9
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
The following table summarizes the expense section of the Companys Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Operations for the reported prior periods indicated, giving effect to the
reclassifications described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported (1) |
|
|
Revised |
|
|
Reported (1) |
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
Cost of licensing and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
Amortization of capitalized software costs |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
Product development and enhancements |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Commissions, royalties and bonuses |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of other
intangible assets |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Other expenses (gains), net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Restructuring and other |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Charge for in-process research and
development costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses before interest and taxes |
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
2,712 |
|
|
$ |
2,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As reported in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 |
Balance Sheet:
Effective with the filing of this third quarter of fiscal year 2008 10-Q Report, the Company
reclassified certain amounts related to its estimates of unearned revenue on amounts billed and not
collected in connection with subscription license agreements and maintenance agreements, which were
reported in Trade and installments accounts receivable, net. For the fiscal year ended March 31,
2007, the Company has reclassified approximately $49 million from Deferred subscription revenue
(collected) current and approximately $39 million from Deferred maintenance revenue to Trade
and installment accounts receivable, net. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the Company has reclassified approximately $204 million from Deferred subscription
revenue (collected) current and approximately $49 million from Deferred maintenance revenue to
Trade and installment accounts receivable, net. These reclassifications were deemed immaterial
and had no effect on the Companys previously reported Consolidated Statements of Operations or
total Cash Flows from Operations for any prior periods.
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company determined that Federal, State and
foreign income taxes payable current and Deferred income taxes current were each overstated
by approximately $32 million, principally related to errors in preparing the year-end estimated tax
provisions for North America. The March 31, 2007 Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet presented in
this Form 10-Q Report has been adjusted to reflect the correction of this error. The impact of
this correction is not considered material to the March 31, 2007 financial statements and does not
affect the previously reported Consolidated Statements of Operations or total Cash Flows from
Operations.
10
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
NOTE B COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income includes net income, unrealized gains and losses on the Companys
available-for-sale securities, and foreign currency translation adjustments. The components of
comprehensive income for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
Net unrealized gains on marketable
securities, net of tax |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE C EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing (i)
the sum of net income and the after-tax amount of interest expense recognized in the period
associated with outstanding dilutive Convertible Senior Notes by (ii) the sum of the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average dilutive common
share equivalents.
For the three-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 12.9 million and 15.9
million of restricted stock awards and options to purchase common stock, respectively, were
excluded from the calculation, as their effect on earnings per share was anti-dilutive during the
respective periods. For the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 14.2
million and 16.1 million of restricted stock awards and options to purchase common stock,
respectively, were excluded from the calculation, as their effect on earnings per share was
anti-dilutive during the respective periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
Interest expense associated with Convertible Senior Notes,
net of tax |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator in calculation of diluted income per share |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding and common share
equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding upon conversion of Convertible |
Senior Notes |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Weighted average equity awards outstanding |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator in calculation of diluted income per share |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income from continuing operations per share |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
NOTE D ACCOUNTING FOR SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Effective April 1, 2005, the Company adopted, under the modified retrospective basis, the
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) Share-based payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), which requires share-based
awards exchanged for employee services to be accounted for under the fair value method.
Accordingly, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value
of the award. The Company uses the straight-line attribution method to recognize share-based
compensation costs related to awards with only service conditions. The expense is recognized over
the employees requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award).
The Company recognized share-based compensation in the following line items on the Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Costs of licensing and maintenance |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Product development and enhancements |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense before tax |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no capitalized share-based compensation costs at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
The following table summarizes information about unrecognized share-based compensation costs as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Average Period |
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Expected to be |
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
Stock option awards |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Performance share units |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized share-based compensation costs |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based incentive awards are provided to employees under the terms of the Companys equity
compensation plans (the Plans). The Plans are administered by the Compensation and Human Resource
Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee). Awards under the Plans may include
at-the-money stock options, premium-priced stock options, restricted stock awards (RSAs),
restricted stock units (RSUs), performance share units (PSUs), or any combination thereof. The
non-employee members of the Companys Board of Directors receive deferred stock units under a
separate director compensation plan.
On August 22, 2007, the stockholders approved the 2007 Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan). Additional
information about the 2007 Plan is included in the Companys August 27, 2007 Form 8-K filing.
Additional information relating to the Companys other Plans which have been approved by
stockholders and a description of the awards issued under these Plans can be found in Note 10,
Stock Plans in the Companys 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
12
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Under the Companys long-term incentive program for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, senior
executives were issued PSUs under which they are eligible to receive RSAs or RSUs and unrestricted
shares at the end of the performance period if certain performance targets are achieved.
Quarterly, PSU values are marked to the closing price of the Companys stock on the last trading
day of the quarter until the PSUs are granted. Compensation costs for the PSUs are amortized over the requisite service periods based on the
expected level of achievement of the performance targets. At the conclusion of the performance
periods for the fiscal year 2008 1-year and 3-year PSUs and the performance period for the fiscal
year 2007 and 2006 3-year PSUs, the applicable number of shares of RSAs or RSUs or unrestricted
stock granted may vary based upon the level of achievement of the performance targets and the
approval of the Committee (which has discretion to reduce any award for any reason). The related
compensation cost recognized will be based on the number of shares granted and the closing stock
price on the day of grant.
Each quarter, the Company compares the performance it expects to achieve with the performance
targets. As of December 31, 2007, the expected levels of achievement of the performance targets
for PSUs not yet granted are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Expected Level of Achievement |
Incentive Plans for Fiscal Years |
|
1 -year PSUs |
|
3 -year PSUs |
2008 |
|
|
141 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
120 |
% |
The 1-year PSUs under the fiscal year 2007 and 2006 long term incentive plans were granted in the
first quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. The table below summarizes the RSAs and
RSUs granted under these PSUs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSAs |
|
RSUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
Incentive Plans |
|
Shares |
|
Average Grant |
|
Shares |
|
Grant Date Fair |
for Fiscal Years |
|
(millions) |
|
Date Fair Value |
|
(millions) |
|
Value |
|
2007 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
26.45 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
26.38 |
|
2006 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares granted amounted to less than 0.1 million |
When the Company grants a stock option award, the fair value of the option is estimated at the
grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No.
123(R) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107,
"Interaction Between FASB Statement No. 123(R), and Certain SEC Rules and Regulations Regarding the
Valuation of Share-Based Payment Arrangements for Public Companies (SAB 107). The Company
believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying
assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Companys stock options.
Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately
realized by employees who receive stock option awards.
For the three-month period ended December 31, 2007, the Company did not issue options. For the
three-month period ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued options covering approximately 0.1
million shares of common stock. For the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company issued options covering less than 0.1 million and approximately 2.5 million shares of
common stock, respectively.
13
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
The weighted average assumptions that were used for option grants in the respective periods are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Weighted average fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.63 |
|
|
$ |
7.84 |
|
|
$ |
8.40 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
Expected volatility factor(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
Risk-free interest rate(2) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Expected term (in years)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expected volatility is measured using the historical daily price changes of the Companys stock
over the respective expected term of the options and the implied volatility derived from the market
prices of the Companys market options traded by third parties. |
|
(2) |
|
The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the share options is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. |
|
(3) |
|
The expected term is the number of years that the Company estimates, based primarily on
historical experience, that options will be outstanding prior to exercise, forfeiture or
expiration. |
The table below summarizes the RSUs and RSAs, including grants provided pursuant to the long term
incentive plans, granted during the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(shares in millions) |
RSUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25.23 |
|
|
$ |
21.97 |
|
RSAs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value |
|
$ |
26.01 |
|
|
$ |
23.30 |
|
|
$ |
25.93 |
|
|
$ |
21.98 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares granted amounted to less than 0.1 million |
NOTE E TRADE AND INSTALLMENT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Company uses installment license agreements as a standard business practice and has a history
of successfully collecting substantially all amounts due under the original payment terms without
making concessions on payments, software products, maintenance, or professional services. Net trade
and installment accounts receivable represent financial assets derived from the committed amounts
due from the Companys customers that have been earned by the Company. These accounts receivable
balances are reflected net of unamortized discounts based on imputed interest for the time value of
money for license agreements under the Companys prior business model, unearned revenue
attributable to maintenance and allowances for doubtful accounts. These balances do not include
unbilled contractual commitments executed under the Companys subscription model. Trade and
installment accounts receivable are comprised of the following components:
14
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Unbilled amounts due within the next 12 months prior business model |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Less: Unearned revenue current |
|
|
(632 |
) |
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trade and installment accounts receivable current |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled amounts due beyond the next 12 months
prior business model |
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Less: Unearned revenue noncurrent |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net installment accounts receivable noncurrent |
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of unearned revenue consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Unearned maintenance |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Deferred subscription revenue (billed, uncollected) |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unearned revenue current |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Unearned maintenance |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unearned revenue noncurrent |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, the Company transferred its rights and interest
in future committed installments under certain software license agreements to a third-party
financial institution with an aggregate contract value of approximately $17 million, for which cash
was received in the amount of approximately $14 million, which reflects a discount based on the
present value of the future committed installments. In the first nine months of fiscal year 2007,
the Company entered into similar transactions with an aggregate contract value of approximately
$109 million, for which cash was received in the amount of approximately $103 million, which
reflects a discount based on the present value of the committed installments. If the Company
transfers its financial interest in future committed installments under a license agreement to a
third-party financing institution, for which revenue has not yet been recognized, the Company
records the liability associated with the receipt of the cash as Financing obligations
(collected) in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. The amounts received from third-party
financing institutions are classified as either current or noncurrent, depending upon when amounts
are expected to be payable by the customer under the license agreement. As the installments become
due and payable from the customer to the third-party financing institution, the Company relieves
its liability to the financing institution and recognizes the previously financed amount as
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet. As of
December 31, 2007, the aggregate remaining amounts due to the third-party financing institutions
classified as Financing obligations (collected) in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet was
approximately $63 million, compared to approximately
$102 million as of March 31, 2007. The financing agreements may contain limited recourse provisions with respect to the Companys
continued performance under the license agreements. Based on its historical experience, the Company
believes that any liability which may be incurred as a result of these limited recourse provisions
will be immaterial.
15
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
NOTE F IDENTIFIED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In the table below, capitalized software includes both purchased and internally developed software
costs; other identified intangible assets includes both purchased customer relationships and
trademarks/trade name costs. Internally developed capitalized software costs and other identified
intangible asset costs are included in Other noncurrent assets, net on the Consolidated Condensed
Balance Sheets.
The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization for identified intangible assets are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Capitalized software: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
$ |
4,785 |
|
|
$ |
4,619 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Internally developed |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Other identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
Other
identified intangible assets not subject to amortization |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,170 |
|
|
$ |
5,443 |
|
|
$ |
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Capitalized software: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
$ |
4,803 |
|
|
$ |
4,600 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
Internally developed |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Other identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Other identified intangible assets not subject to
amortization |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,113 |
|
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
|
$ |
777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, amortization of capitalized software costs was
$29 million and $83 million, respectively, and amortization of other identified intangible assets
was $16 million and $14 million, respectively.
For the first nine months of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, amortization of capitalized software costs
was $87 million and $271 million, respectively, and amortization of other identified intangible
assets was $51 million and $41 million, respectively. The decline in amortization of capitalized
software costs is attributable to certain intangible assets from prior acquisitions being fully
amortized.
Based on the identified intangible assets recorded through December 31, 2007, annual amortization
expense is expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Capitalized software: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Internally developed |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other identified intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
During the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, goodwill increased by approximately $10
million, primarily due to the acquisitions of small software companies. Refer to Note G,
Acquisitions, for additional information relating to the Companys acquisitions.
NOTE G ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions are accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, their results of operations have been
included in the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements since the dates of their acquisitions.
The purchase price for the Companys acquisitions is allocated to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed from the acquired entity. These allocations are based upon estimates which may
be revised within one year of the date of acquisition as additional information becomes available.
It is anticipated that the final purchase price allocations for these acquisitions will not differ
materially from their preliminary allocations. The Companys acquisitions during the first nine
months of fiscal year 2008 were considered immaterial compared to the results of the Companys
operations and therefore purchase accounting information and pro-forma disclosure are not
presented.
During the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, the Company paid approximately $9 million in
remaining holdback payments related to prior period acquisitions, which was included in the
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities line on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet
at March 31, 2007.
Accrued acquisition-related costs and changes in these accruals, including additions related to
both the current year and prior year acquisitions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duplicate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities and |
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
Other Costs |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Adjustments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liabilities for duplicate facilities and other costs relate to operating leases, which are
actively being renegotiated and expire at various times through 2010, negotiated buyouts of
operating lease commitments and other contractual liabilities. The liabilities for employee costs
relate to involuntary termination benefits. Adjustments to the corresponding liability and related
goodwill accounts are recorded when obligations are settled at amounts less than those originally
estimated. The remaining liability balances are included in the Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities line item on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets.
NOTE H RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER
Fiscal 2007 Restructuring Plan
In August 2006, the Company announced the Fiscal 2007 Plan to improve the Companys expense
structure and increase its competitiveness. The Fiscal 2007 Plans objectives include a workforce
reduction, global facilities consolidations and other cost reduction initiatives. The total cost
of the Fiscal 2007 Plan is expected to be approximately $200 million.
Severance: The Company currently estimates a reduction in workforce of approximately 2,400
positions in connection with the Fiscal 2007 Plan, including approximately 300 positions from the
divestitures of consolidated majority owned subsidiaries. The termination benefits the Company has
offered in connection with this workforce reduction are substantially the same as the benefits the
Company has provided historically for non-performance-based workforce reductions. In certain
countries, termination benefits have been provided based upon prior experiences with the
restructuring plan announced in July 2005 (the Fiscal 2006 Plan) as described below. These costs
have been recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 112,
17
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
Employers Accounting for Post Employment Benefits, an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 43 (SFAS No. 112). Enhancements to termination benefits which exceed past practice or legal
requirements are being recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
With Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146). The Company recorded severance costs of $8
million and $14 million for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Company anticipates the total severance cost for the Fiscal
2007 Plan will be approximately $150 million, of which approximately $142 million has been recognized through December 31, 2007.
Substantially all of the costs under the plan are expected to be recognized by the end of fiscal
year 2008. The plans associated with the balance of the reductions in workforce are still being
finalized and the associated charges will be recorded once the actions are approved by management.
Facilities Abandonment: The Company records the costs associated with lease terminations or
abandonments when the Company ceases to utilize the property. Under SFAS No. 146, the liability
associated with lease termination or abandonment is measured as the present value of the total
remaining lease costs and associated operating costs reduced by estimated sublease rentals that
could be reasonably obtained for the property. The Company accretes its obligations related to the
facilities abandonment to the then-present value and, accordingly, recognizes accretion expense as
a restructuring expense in future periods. The Company incurred approximately $13 million of
charges related to abandoned properties during the first nine months of fiscal year 2008,
approximately $2 million of which was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, and
approximately $36 million since the plans inception. The Company anticipates the total cost for
facilities abandonment will be approximately $50 million under the Fiscal 2007 Plan. The majority
of the remaining obligation is expected to be recognized by the end of fiscal year 2008.
For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, restructuring activity under the Fiscal 2007
Plan was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Abandonment |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Accrual balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Additions |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual balance at December 31,
2007 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining liability for severance is included in the Accrued salaries, wages and commissions
line on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet. The liability for the facilities portion of the
remaining reserve is included in the Accrued expenses and other current liabilities line item on
the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet. The costs are included in the Restructuring and other
line item on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations for the periods ended December 31,
2007 and 2006.
Fiscal 2006 Restructuring Plan
In July 2005, the Company announced the Fiscal 2006 Plan to increase efficiency and productivity
and to align its investments more closely with strategic growth opportunities. The Company
accounted for the individual components of the restructuring plan as follows:
Severance: The Fiscal 2006 Plan included a workforce reduction of approximately five percent, or
800 positions, worldwide. The termination benefits the Company offered in connection with this
workforce reduction were substantially the same as the benefits the Company has provided
historically for non-performance-based workforce reductions. In certain countries, termination
benefits were provided based upon statutory minimum requirements. The employee termination
obligations incurred in connection with the Fiscal 2006 Plan were accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 112. In certain countries, the Company elected to provide termination benefits in excess
of legal requirements subsequent to the initial
18
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
implementation of the plan. These additional costs have been recognized in accordance with SFAS
No. 146. The Company incurred a total of approximately $57 million of severance costs since
inception through the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. The Company has recognized substantially
all of the severance related costs associated with the Fiscal 2006 Plan. Final payment of these
amounts is dependent upon settlement with the works councils in certain international locations.
Facilities Abandonment: The Company recorded the costs associated with lease termination or
abandonment when the Company ceased to utilize the leased property. Under SFAS No. 146, the
liability associated with lease termination or abandonment is measured as the present value of the
total remaining lease costs and associated operating costs, less probable sublease income. The
Company incurred a total of approximately $29 million of facilities abandonment costs since
inception through the first nine months of fiscal year 2008. The Company accretes its obligations
related to the facilities abandonment to the then-present value and, accordingly, recognizes
accretion expense as a restructuring expense in future periods. The Company has recognized
substantially all of the facilities abandonment costs associated with the Fiscal 2006 Plan.
For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, restructuring activity under the Fiscal 2006
Plan was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Abandonment |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Accrual balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
(Reductions)
additions |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liability balance for the severance portion of the remaining reserve is included in the
Accrued salaries, wages and commissions line on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets of the
respective periods. The liability for the facilities portion of the remaining reserve is included
in the Accrued expenses and other current liabilities line item on the Consolidated Condensed
Balance Sheets.
Other: During the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 the Company incurred approximately $9
million in legal and other related costs in connection with matters reviewed by the Special
Litigation Committee, composed of independent members of the Board of Directors (see also Note J,
Commitments and Contingencies). Approximately $7 million of these costs were incurred in the
third quarter of fiscal year 2008. In the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, the Company
recorded impairment charges of approximately $5 million, including approximately $3 million for products that were
discontinued. Aproximately $4 million of these charges were recorded in the third quarter of fiscal year
2008. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company incurred an approximate $4 million
expense related to a loss on the sale of an investment in marketable securities associated with the
closure of an international location.
NOTE I INCOME TAXES
The Companys income tax expense for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was
approximately $76 million and $238 million, respectively. By comparison, the Companys income tax
expense for the corresponding periods in its prior fiscal year was approximately $18 million and
$40 million, respectively. For the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, the
Companys income tax provision included charges of approximately $12 million and $23 million,
respectively, associated with certain corporate income tax rate reductions enacted in various
non-US tax jurisdictions during such periods (with corresponding impacts on the Companys net
deferred tax assets). In addition, the Companys income tax provision for the three and nine-month
periods ending December 31, 2007 included a credit of approximately $7 million and a net charge of
approximately $3 million, respectively, resulting from
adjustments related to certain prior year non-US
tax provisions. Also included in the Companys income tax provision for the quarter ending December
31, 2007 was an approximate $8 million tax benefit resulting from the release of valuation
allowances on deferred tax assets residing with the Companys Asia-Pacific
19
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
subsidiaries. For the three-month period ended December 31, 2006, the tax provision included a net
benefit of approximately $5 million, primarily arising from a revision of the Companys estimated
Section 199 manufacturing deduction. For the nine-month period ending December 31, 2006, the tax
provision included a net benefit of approximately $18 million, primarily arising from the
resolution of certain international and U.S. tax contingencies.
On April 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, which sets forth a comprehensive model for financial
statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken
or expected to be taken in income tax returns. For further information, see Note A, Basis of
Presentation. Upon such adoption, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax
positions was approximately $282 million and the deferred tax assets arising from such uncertain
tax positions (from interest and state income tax deductions) were approximately $48 million. If
the unrecognized tax benefits associated with these positions are ultimately recognized, they would
primarily affect the Companys effective tax rate and its Stockholders Equity.
As a result of the Company adopting FIN 48, there was an increase to retained earnings of
approximately $11 million and a corresponding decrease to tax liabilities. In addition, the
Company reclassified approximately $243 million of income tax liabilities from current to
non-current liabilities because the cash payment of such liabilities was not anticipated to occur
within one year of the balance sheet date. All non-current income tax liabilities are recorded in
the Federal, state and foreign income taxes payable noncurrent line in the Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in
income tax expense. The Company had $40 million of accrued interest expense, net of $23 million in
tax benefits, and penalties as of the date of adoption of FIN 48.
As of December 31, 2007, the nature of the uncertain tax positions expected to be resolved within
the next twelve (12) months thereafter relate primarily to various U.S. federal and state income
tax audits and are recorded in the Federal, state and foreign income taxes payable current line
in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. The Companys estimate of potential changes to its
uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months is a reduction of up to $24 million. Such
decreases would be primarily attributable to the outcomes of certain ongoing tax audits and/or the
expiration of certain statutes of limitations. As of December 31, 2007, the liability for income
taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was approximately $286 million (of which $107 million
was classified as current) and the deferred tax assets arising from such uncertain tax positions
(from interest and state income tax deductions) were approximately $52 million.
The number of years with open tax audits varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The Company has
historically viewed its material tax jurisdictions as including the U.S., Japan, Germany, Italy and
the U.K. The earliest years still open and subject to ongoing audits or tax proceedings as of the
date of adoption of FIN 48 in respect of such jurisdictions were as follows: (i) United States
2001; (ii) Japan 2000; (iii) Germany 2003; (iv) Italy 1999; and (v) the U.K. 1999.
NOTE J COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Certain legal proceedings in which we are involved are discussed in Note 8, Commitments and
Contingencies, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the 2007 Form 10-K). The following
discussion should be read in conjunction with the 2007 Form 10-K.
Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004
The Company, its former Chairman and CEO Charles B. Wang, its former Chairman and CEO Sanjay Kumar,
its former Chief Financial Officer Ira Zar, and its Vice Chairman and Founder Russell M. Artzt were
defendants in one or more stockholder class action lawsuits filed in July 1998, February 2002, and
March 2002 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the Federal
Court), alleging, among other things, that a class consisting of all persons who purchased the
Common Stock
20
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
during the period from January 20, 1998 until July 22, 1998 were harmed by misleading statements,
misrepresentations, and omissions regarding the Companys future financial performance.
In addition, in May 2003, a class action lawsuit captioned John A. Ambler v. Computer Associates
International, Inc., et al. was filed in the Federal Court. The complaint in this matter, a
purported class action on behalf of the CA Savings Harvest Plan (the CASH Plan) and the
participants in, and beneficiaries of, the CASH Plan for a class period running from March 30, 1998
through May 30, 2003, asserted claims of breach of fiduciary duty under the federal Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The named defendants were the Company, the Companys Board
of Directors, the CASH Plan, the Administrative Committee of the CASH Plan, and the following
current or former employees and/or former directors of the Company: Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Zar,
Artzt, Peter A. Schwartz, and Charles P. McWade; and various unidentified alleged fiduciaries of
the CASH Plan. The complaint alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by causing
the CASH Plan to invest in Company securities and sought damages in an unspecified amount.
A derivative lawsuit was filed by Charles Federman against certain current and former directors of
the Company, based on essentially the same allegations as those contained in the February and March
2002 stockholder lawsuits discussed above. This action was commenced in April 2002 in Delaware
Chancery Court, and an amended complaint was filed in November 2002. The defendants named in the
amended complaint were current Company director The Honorable Alfonse M. DAmato and former Company
directors Ms. Shirley Strum Kenny and Messrs. Wang, Kumar, Artzt, Willem de Vogel, Richard Grasso,
Roel Pieper, and Lewis S. Ranieri. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The derivative suit
alleged breach of fiduciary duties on the part of all the individual defendants and, as against the
former management director defendants, insider trading on the basis of allegedly misappropriated
confidential, material information. The amended complaint sought an accounting and recovery on
behalf of the Company of an unspecified amount of damages, including recovery of the profits
allegedly realized from the sale of Common Stock.
On August 25, 2003, the Company announced the settlement of the above-described class action
lawsuits against the Company and certain of its present and former officers and directors, alleging
misleading statements, misrepresentations, and omissions regarding the Companys financial
performance, as well as breaches of fiduciary duty. At the same time, the Company also announced
the settlement of a derivative lawsuit, in which the Company was named as a nominal defendant,
filed against certain present and former officers and directors of the Company, alleging breaches
of fiduciary duty and, against certain management directors, insider trading, as well as the
settlement of an additional derivative action filed by Charles Federman that had been pending in
the Federal Court. As part of the class action settlement, which was approved by the Federal Court
in December 2003, the Company agreed to issue a total of up to 5.7 million shares of Common Stock
to the stockholders represented in the three class action lawsuits, including payment of attorneys
fees. The Company has completed the issuance of the settlement shares as well as payment of
$3.3 million to the plaintiffs attorneys in legal fees and related expenses.
In settling the derivative suits, which settlement was also approved by the Federal Court in
December 2003, the Company committed to maintain certain corporate governance practices. Under the
settlement, the Company, the individual defendants and all other current and former officers and
directors of the Company were released from any potential claim by stockholders arising from
accounting-related or other public statements made by the Company or its agents from January 1998
through February 2002 (and from March 11, 1998 through May 2003 in the case of the employee ERISA
action). The individual defendants were released from any potential claim by or on behalf of the
Company relating to the same matters.
On October 5, 2004 and December 9, 2004, four purported Company stockholders served motions to
vacate the Order of Final Judgment and Dismissal entered by the Federal Court in December 2003 in
connection with the settlement of the derivative action. These motions primarily sought to void the
21
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
releases that were granted to the individual defendants under the settlement. On December 7, 2004,
a motion to vacate the Order of Final Judgment and Dismissal entered by the Federal Court in
December 2003 in connection with the settlement of the 1998 and 2002 stockholder lawsuits discussed
above was filed by Sam Wyly and certain related parties (the Wyly Litigants). The motion sought
to reopen the settlement to permit the moving stockholders to pursue individual claims against
certain present and former officers of the Company. The motion stated that the moving stockholders
did not seek to file claims against the Company. On June 14, 2005, the Federal Court granted
movants motion to be allowed to take limited discovery prior to the Federal Courts ruling on
these motions (the 60(b) Motions).
In a memorandum and order dated August 2, 2007, the Federal Court denied all of the 60(b) Motions
and reaffirmed the 2003 settlements (the August 2 decision). On August 24, 2007, Ranger Governance,
Ltd. (Ranger) and the Wyly Litigants filed notices of appeal of the August 2 decision.
On August 16, 2007, the Special Litigation Committee of independent members of the Companys Board
of Directors filed a motion to amend or clarify the August 2 decision, and the Company
joined that motion. On September 12, 2007 and October 4, 2007, the Federal Court issued opinions
denying the motions to amend or clarify. On September 18, 2007, the Wyly Litigants and Ranger filed
notices of appeal of the September 12 decision. CA filed notices of cross-appeal of the
September 12 and October 4 decisions on November 2, 2007. On December 3,
2007, Ranger filed a motion to dismiss CAs cross-appeals. By Order dated December 7, 2007, all of
the appeals and cross-appeals were stayed pending a decision on Rangers motion to dismiss.
The Government Investigation DPA Concluded
In September 2004, the Federal Court approved a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) between the
Company and the United States Attorneys Office (USAO) and a consent to enter into a final judgment
(Consent Judgment) in a parallel proceeding brought by the SEC regarding certain of the Companys
past accounting practices, including its revenue recognition policies and procedures during certain
periods prior to the adoption of the Companys new business model in October 2000. The DPA and the
Consent Judgment resolved the USAO and SEC investigations into those past accounting practices and
obstruction of their investigations. In May 2007, based upon the Companys compliance with the
terms of the DPA, the Federal Court ordered dismissal of the charges that had been filed against
the Company in connection with the DPA and the DPA expired. The injunctive provisions of the
Consent Judgment permanently enjoining the Company from violating certain provisions of the federal
securities laws remain in effect.
Derivative Actions Filed in 2004
In June and July 2004, three purported derivative actions were filed in the Federal Court by
Ranger, Bert Vladimir and Irving Rosenzweig against certain current or former employees and/or
directors of the Company. In November 2004, the Federal Court issued an order consolidating these
three derivative actions. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint (the Consolidated
Complaint) on January 7, 2005. The Consolidated Complaint names as defendants Messrs. Wang, Kumar,
Zar, Artzt, DAmato, Richards, Ranieri and Woghin; Messrs. Kaplan, Rivard and Silverstein; Michael
A. McElroy; Messrs. McWade and Schwartz; Gary Fernandes; Robert E. La Blanc; Jay W. Lorsch; Kenneth
Cron; Walter P. Schuetze; Messrs. de Vogel and Grasso; Roel Pieper; KPMG LLP; and Ernst & Young
LLP. The Company is named as a nominal defendant. The Consolidated Complaint seeks from one or more
of the defendants (1) for contribution towards the consideration the Company had previously agreed
to provide current and former stockholders in settlement of certain class action litigation
commenced against the Company and certain officers and directors in 1998 and 2002 (see
Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004), (2) compensatory and
consequential damages in an amount not less than $500 million in connection with the USAO and SEC
investigations (see The Government Investigation DPA Concluded), (3) unspecified relief for
violations of
Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act for alleged false and material misstatements made
in the Companys proxy statements issued in 2002 and 2003, (4) relief for alleged breach of
fiduciary duty, (5) unspecified compensatory, consequential and
22
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
punitive damages based upon allegations of corporate waste and fraud, (6) unspecified damages for
breach of duty of reasonable care, (7) restitution and rescission of the compensation earned under
the Companys executive compensation plan and (8) pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, reimbursement of bonus or other incentive-based equity compensation and alleged profits
realized from sales of securities issued by the Company. Although no relief is sought from the
Company, the Consolidated Complaint seeks monetary damages, both compensatory and consequential,
from the other defendants, including current or former employees and/or directors of the Company,
E&Y and KPMG in an amount totaling not less than $500 million.
The consolidated derivative action was stayed pending resolution of the 60(b) Motions, which have
been denied (see Stockholder Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior to 2004). On
February 1, 2005, the Company established a Special Litigation Committee of independent members of
its Board of Directors to, among other things, control and determine the Companys response to the
Consolidated Complaint and the 60(b) Motions. On April 13, 2007, the Special Litigation Committee
issued its reports, which announced the Special Litigation Committees conclusions, determinations,
recommendations and actions with respect to the claims asserted in the Derivative Actions and in
the 60(b) Motions. Also, in response to the Consolidated Complaint, the Special Litigation
Committee served a motion which seeks to dismiss and realign the claims and parties in accordance
with the Special Litigation Committees recommendations. As summarized in the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 13, 2007 and in the bullets below, the Special
Litigation Committee concluded as follows:
The Special Litigation Committee has concluded that it would be in the best interests of the
Company to pursue certain of the claims against Charles Wang (CAs former Chairman and CEO) and
former officer Peter Schwartz.
The Special Litigation Committee has concluded that it would be in the best interests of the
Company to pursue certain of the claims against the former CA executives who have pled guilty to
various charges of securities fraud and/or obstruction of justice including David Kaplan (CAs
former head of Financial Reporting), Stephen Richards (CAs former head of Worldwide Sales), David
Rivard (CAs former head of Sales Accounting), Lloyd Silverstein (CAs former head of the Global
Sales Organization), Steven Woghin (CAs former General Counsel) and Ira Zar (CAs former CFO). The
Special Litigation Committee has determined and directed that these claims be pursued by CA using
counsel retained by the Company, unless the Special Litigation Committee is able to successfully
conclude its ongoing settlement negotiations with these individuals.
The Special Litigation Committee has reached a settlement (subject to court approval) with Sanjay
Kumar (CAs former Chairman and CEO). ), Charles McWade (CAs former head of Financial Reporting
and business development) and Russell Artzt (currently Vice Chairman and Founder and a former CA
Board member).
The Special Litigation Committee believes that the claims (the Director Claims) against current
and former CA directors Kenneth Cron, Alfonse DAmato, Willem de Vogel, Gary Fernandes, Richard
Grasso, Shirley Strum Kenny, Robert La Blanc, Jay Lorsch, Roel Pieper, Lewis Ranieri, Walter
Schuetze and Alex Vieux should be dismissed. The Special Litigation Committee has concluded that
these directors did not breach their fiduciary duties and the claims against them lack merit.
The Special Litigation Committee has concluded that it would be in the best interests of the
Company to seek dismissal of the claims against CAs former
independent auditor, E&Y, CAs current
independent auditors, KPMG, and former officer Michael McElroy (CAs former senior vice president
of the Legal department).
23
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
The Special Litigation Committee has served motions which seek dismissal of the Director Claims,
the claims against E&Y and KPMG, Michael
McElroy and certain other claims. In addition, the
Special Litigation Committee has asked for the Federal Courts approval for the Company to be
realigned as the plaintiff with respect to claims against certain other parties, including Messrs.
Wang and Schwartz.
By letter dated July 19, 2007, counsel for the Special Litigation Committee advised the Federal
Court that the Special Litigation Committee had reached a settlement of the Derivative Litigation
with two of the three derivative plaintiffs Bert Vladimir, represented by Squitieri & Fearon,
LLP, and Irving Rosenzweig, represented by Harwood Feffer LLP (formerly Wechsler Harwood LLP). In
connection with the settlement, both of these plaintiffs have agreed to support the Special
Litigation Committees motion to dismiss and to realign. CA has agreed to pay the attorneys fees
of Messrs. Vladimir and Rosenzweig in an amount up to $525,000 each. If finalized, this settlement
would require approval of the Federal Court. On July 23, 2007, Ranger filed a letter with the
Federal Court objecting to the proposed settlement. On October 29, 2007, the Federal Court denied
the Special Litigation Committees motion to dismiss and realign, without prejudice to renewing
said motion after a decision by the appellate court regarding the Federal Courts decisions
concerning the 60(b) motions (see Stockholder class Action and Derivative Lawsuits Filed Prior
to 2004).
The Company is obligated to indemnify its officers and directors under certain circumstances to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. As a part of that obligation, the Company has advanced
and will continue to advance certain attorneys fees and expenses incurred by current and former
officers and directors in various litigations and investigations arising out of similar
allegations, including the litigation described above.
Derivative Actions Filed in 2006
On August 10, 2006, a purported derivative action was filed in the Federal Court by Charles
Federman against certain current or former directors of the Company (the 2006 Federman Action). On
September 15, 2006, a purported derivative action was filed in the Federal Court by Bert Vladimir
and Irving Rosenzweig against certain current or former directors of the Company (the 2006 Vladimir
Action). By order dated October 26, 2006, the Federal Court ordered the 2006 Federman Action and
the 2006 Vladimir Action consolidated. Under the order, the actions are now captioned CA, Inc.
Shareholders Derivative Litigation Employee Option Action. On December 31, 2007, the Company
informed the Federal Court that the parties have reached an agreement to settle the action. In
connection with the settlement, CA has agreed to maintain for a period of not less than three years
certain corporate governance practices, measures and policies. CA has also agreed to pay the
attorneys fees of Messrs. Vladimir and Rosenzweig in an amount up to $1 million in total. The
parties plan to submit a stipulation of settlement and proposed order for the Federal Courts
approval.
Texas Litigation
On August 9, 2004, a petition was filed by Sam Wyly and Ranger against the Company in the District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (the Ranger Governance Litigation), seeking to obtain a declaratory
judgment that plaintiffs did not breach two separation agreements they entered into with the
Company in 2002 (the 2002 Agreements). Plaintiffs seek to obtain this declaratory judgment in order
to file a derivative suit on behalf of the Company (see Derivative Actions Filed in 2004). On
February 18, 2005, Mr. Wyly filed a separate lawsuit in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Texas (the Texas Federal Court) alleging that he is entitled to attorneys
fees in connection with the original litigation filed in Texas. The two actions have been
consolidated. On March 31, 2005, the plaintiffs amended their complaint to allege a claim that they
were defrauded into entering the 2002 Agreements and to seek rescission of those agreements and
damages. On September 1, 2005, the Texas Federal Court granted the Companys motion to transfer the
action to the Federal Court. On November 9, 2007, plaintiffs served a motion to reopen discovery
for 90 days to permit unspecified additional
24
CA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(unaudited)
document requests and depositions. The Company served its opposition to plaintiffs motion on
November 16, 2007. The Federal Court has not yet decided the motion.
Other Civil Actions
In June 2004, a lawsuit captioned Scienton Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Computer Associates
International, Inc. was filed in the Federal Court. The complaint seeks monetary damages in various
amounts, some of which are unspecified, but which are alleged to exceed $868 million, based upon
claims for, among other things, breaches of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and unfair
competition. Although the ultimate outcome cannot be determined, the Company believes that the
claims are unfounded and that the Company has meritorious defenses. In the opinion of management,
the resolution of this lawsuit is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
On May 23, 2007, a lawsuit captioned The Bank of New York v. CA, Inc. et al., was filed in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. On December 21, 2007, CA, The Bank of New
York, and the holders of a majority of the Notes reached a settlement of this litigation, as
described in CAs Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 9, 2008. The settlement became effective upon the signature of the Stipulation of
Dismissal with Prejudice by Justice Ramos of the New York Supreme Court on January 3, 2008.
The Company, various subsidiaries, and certain current and former officers have been named as
defendants in various other lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business. The
Company believes that it has meritorious defenses in connection with such lawsuits and claims, and
intends to vigorously contest each of them. In the opinion of the Companys management, the results
of these other lawsuits and claims, either individually or in the aggregate, are not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash
flow.
NOTE K DIVESTITURES
Discontinued Operations: In November 2006, the Company sold its 70% interest in Benit Company,
formerly known as Liger Systems Co. Ltd. (Benit), for approximately $3.3 million. The 70% interest
sold represented all of the Companys outstanding equity interest in Benit. Benit offered a wide
range of corporate solution services in Korea, such as IT outsourcing, business integration
services, enterprise solutions and IT service management. The sale was part of the Companys
Fiscal 2007 Plan, which included an estimated headcount reduction of 300 positions associated with
consolidated subsidiaries considered to be joint ventures. Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company has separately presented the
results of Benit as a discontinued operation in the December 31, 2006 Consolidated Condensed
Statement of Operations. For further information, refer to the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2007.
25
Item 2:
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statement
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) contains, in addition to historical information,
certain forward-looking information relating to CA, Inc. (the Company, Registrant, CA, we,
our, or us) that is based on the beliefs of, and assumptions made by, our management as well as
information currently available to management. When used in this Form 10-Q, the words
anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking information. Such information includes the statements made in this Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), but also appears
in other parts of this Form 10-Q. This forward-looking information reflects our current views with
respect to future events and is subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, some of
which are described under the caption Risk Factors in Part 1 Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should our assumptions prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this Form 10-Q as
anticipated, believed, estimated, or expected. We do not intend to update these forward-looking
statements. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our
financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
OVERVIEW
CA, Inc. is one of the worlds largest providers of enterprise software. Our products and
solutions are designed to help our customers govern, manage and secure information technology (IT)
systems and services in highly complex computing environments.
We develop, acquire, and license software, which we sell as products or in multi-product solutions.
Our products and solutions are designed to meet our corporate mission to unify and simplify the
management of enterprise IT, and to enable our customers to better achieve measurable value from
their IT investments. CAs products can be used to govern, manage and secure a wide range of
computing platforms. They are well suited to address the complexity endemic to mission critical IT
environments, which are almost always composed of products from a variety of vendors. Considering
the depth and breadth of our products, their ease of integration with existing customer technology
investments, and our commitment to open standards and innovation, we believe our Enterprise IT
Management (EITM) approach is unique to CA.
We license our products principally to large IT service providers, financial services companies,
government agencies, retailers, manufacturers, educational institutions, and healthcare
institutions, worldwide. These customers typically maintain IT infrastructures that are both
complex and central to their objectives for operational excellence.
We offer our software products and solutions directly to our customers through our direct sales
force, and indirectly through global systems integrators, value-added partners, original equipment
manufacturers, and distribution partners.
Most of our revenue is generated through subscription license agreements. Under these agreements
our customers generally receive the right to use specified software products, the right to
maintenance with respect to those products, and the right to receive and use unspecified future
software products during the term of the license (usually approximately three years) for no
additional fee. As required under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), revenue from
such licenses is recognized on a ratable basis, i.e., on an even monthly basis throughout the term
of the license. We refer to this as our subscription model and to the associated revenue as
subscription revenue. We refer to the contract amount that has not yet been recognized as
revenue as deferred subscription value. As revenue is ratably earned and recognized during the
term of a subscription license, the deferred subscription value associated with the
26
Item 2:
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
license declines correspondingly. New deferred subscription value refers to the aggregate total
amount that customers agree to pay under new or renewal subscription licenses, net of previous
obligations, booked during a reporting period. Under our subscription licenses, customers
typically pay us in annual installments. However, we may collect as much as the entire contract
value at the outset of the license agreement.
A relatively small portion of our revenue is generated from licenses based on a perpetual revenue
recognition model, under which the entire contract amount for software license fees is recognized
as revenue at the outset of the license term (or up-front), and maintenance fees are recognized
ratably over the term of the license. We also generate revenue through professional services we
provide to our customers, primarily in connection with product implementations and education and
training of customer employees in the use of our products and solutions.
For further discussion of our business and business model see our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For further discussion of our Critical Accounting Policies and Business Practices, see Critical
Accounting Policies and Business Practices, which is included in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q
Report.
QUARTERLY UPDATE
|
|
|
In October 2007, CA announced the official opening of its India
Technology Center (ITC) in Hyderabad. The state-of-the-art campus
reflects the substantial investment CA has made in staffing the
ITCs research and development operations and sales departments.
CAs workforce in India now exceeds 1,600. The ITC team will take
a lead role in advancing CAs Enterprise IT Management (EITM)
vision of unifying and simplifying IT management. |
|
|
|
|
In October 2007, CA unveiled a comprehensive solution for
empowering IT organizations to achieve their increasingly
challenging and business-critical Governance, Risk and Compliance
(GRC) objectives. The solution features CAs GRC Manager, an
innovative product that provides portfolio management of IT risks
across the enterprise, as well as CAs industry-leading IT control
automation solutions. |
|
|
|
|
In October 2007, CA announced new versions of five solutions for
IBM z/OS that strengthen and automate the protection of corporate
IT resources, while helping with legal and regulatory compliance. |
|
|
|
|
In November 2007, CA announced CA IAM r12, a major new version of
its identity and access management solution that helps customers
more securely and efficiently enable their businesses with service
oriented architecture (SOA) and Web services. |
|
|
|
|
In November 2007, CA and HCL Technologies (HCL) announced an
agreement in principle to establish a strategic partnership in
which HCL will assume all research and product development
connected with CAs threat management security business. CA will
retain all sales and marketing functions. The agreement is
expected to be finalized in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2008. |
27
Item 2:
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Management uses several quantitative performance indicators to assess our financial results and
condition. Following is a summary of the principal quantitative performance indicators that
management uses to review performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Subscription revenue |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
New deferred subscription value (direct) 1 |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
New deferred subscription value (indirect) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
)% |
Weighted average license agreement duration in years
(direct) |
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
(354 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
)% |
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
213 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
Total revenue |
|
$ |
3,192 |
|
|
$ |
2,938 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Subscription revenue |
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
2,274 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
New deferred subscription value (direct) 1 |
|
$ |
2,486 |
|
|
$ |
2,215 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
New deferred subscription value (indirect) |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
Weighted average license agreement duration in years
(direct) |
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
|
204 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
From |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
From Prior |
|
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
Year End |
|
2006 |
|
Year Quarter |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities2 |
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
2,585 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash to be collected current 3 |
|
$ |
2,785 |
|
|
$ |
2,519 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
2,645 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
Cash to be collected noncurrent 3 |
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
$ |
1,710 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
1,743 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
Aggregate deferred subscription value |
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) |
|
$ |
2,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes our one-tier channel business |
|
2 |
|
For December 31, 2007, March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 marketable securities were
approximately $1 milllion, $5 million and $9 million, respectively. |
|
3 |
|
Refer to the Reconciliation of Amounts to be Collected to Accounts Receivable
discussion in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for additional information |
Analyses of our performance indicators, including general trends, can be found in the Results of
Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources sections of this MD&A. The performance indicators
discussed below are those that we believe are unique because of our subscription-based business
model.
28
Subscription Revenue Subscription revenue is the amount of revenue recognized ratably
during the reporting period from amounts initially recorded as deferred subscription value under
our subscription model.
New Deferred Subscription Value New deferred subscription value (NDSV) is the aggregate
incremental amount we expect to collect from our customers over the terms of the underlying
subscription license agreements entered into during a reporting period. NDSV includes amounts
expected to be collected from contracts entered into during a reporting period for the sale of
products to distributors, resellers and value-added-resellers (VARs) where the contracts
incorporate the right of end-users to receive unspecified future software products. These amounts
will be recognized ratably as subscription revenue over the applicable software license terms. NDSV
typically excludes the value associated with up-front or perpetual based licenses,
maintenance-only license agreements, license-only indirect sales, and professional services
arrangements. It also includes that portion of bundled maintenance or unamortized discounts that
are converted into subscription revenue upon renewal of contracts, which prior to renewal were
based on the up-front model.
The license agreements that contribute to new deferred subscription value represent binding payment
commitments by customers over periods generally up to approximately three years. The amount of new
deferred subscription value recorded in a quarter is impacted by the volume and amount of contracts
renewed during the quarter. Typically, our new deferred subscription value increases in each
consecutive quarter during a fiscal year, with the first quarter being the weakest and the fourth
quarter being the strongest. However, as we make efforts to improve the balance of the distribution
of our contract renewals throughout the fiscal year, new deferred subscription value may not always
follow the pattern of increasing in consecutive quarters during a fiscal year, and the quarter to
quarter differences in new deferred subscription value may be more moderate. Additionally, changes
in new deferred subscription value, relative to previous periods, do not necessarily correlate to
changes in billings or cash receipts, relative to previous periods. The contribution to current
period revenue from new deferred subscription value from any single license agreement is relatively
small, since revenue is recognized ratably over the applicable license agreement term.
Weighted Average License Agreement Duration in Years The weighted average license
agreement duration in years for our direct business reflects the duration of all software licenses
executed during a period, weighted to reflect the contract value of each individual software
license. The weighted average duration is impacted by the number and dollar amounts of contracts
renewed during the period, and therefore may change from period to period and will not necessarily
correlate to the prior year periods. If the weighted average life of our subscription license
agreements remains constant, an increase in deferred subscription value will ultimately result in
an increase in subscription revenue in future periods.
Annualized new deferred subscription value represents the annual amount of new deferred
subscription value to be recognized as subscription revenue from our direct business in future
years based on the weighted average duration of the underlying contracts. It is calculated by
dividing the total value of all new term-based software license agreements entered into during a
period in our direct business by the weighted average life of all such license agreements recorded
during the same period. The annualized new deferred subscription value measures the revenue to be
realized on an annual basis from the contracts signed.
Deferred Subscription Value Under our subscription model, the portion of the license
contract value that has not yet been earned and recognized as revenue constitutes what we refer to
as deferred subscription value. As revenue from subscription license agreements is ratably
recognized, it is reported as Subscription revenue on our Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Operations.
Deferred Subscription Revenue (collected) Under our subscription model, customers
typically pay in annual installments, often with at least one installment due at contract execution
for a portion of the total contract value. To the extent a customers payment precedes the ratable
recognition of revenue under our subscription model, the amounts are reported on our Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets as a liability entitled either Deferred subscription revenue (collected)
current or Deferred subscription
29
revenue (collected) noncurrent, depending on when the related revenue is expected to be
recognized (i.e., within the next twelve months or subsequent to the next twelve months).
In some instances, rather than receive amounts directly from the customer, we may choose to
transfer our financial interest in future committed installments under subscription license
agreements to a third-party financing institution. In such instances, we initially recognize a
liability associated with the receipt of the cash from the financing institution entitled
Financing obligations (collected) on our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. The liability is
classified as current and/or noncurrrent depending on the timing of the customers expected
payments to the financing institution. As amounts become payable by the customer to the financing
institution, we relieve our liability to the financing institution and recognize the previously
financed amount as Deferred subscription revenue (collected) on our Consolidated Condensed
Balance Sheets.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue:
The following table presents changes in the reported revenue line items on our Consolidated
Condensed Statement of Operations for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 measured by Dollar Change, Percentage of Dollar Change, and Percentage of Total Revenue. These
comparisons of past financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
of |
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
Dollar |
|
Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
2007/ |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007/2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenue |
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Software fees and other |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
of |
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
Dollar |
|
Total |
|
|
Revenue |
|
2007/ |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007/2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenue |
|
$ |
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
2,274 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Software fees and other |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
3,192 |
|
|
$ |
2,938 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
Total Revenue
As more fully described below, the increase in total revenue for both the three and nine-month
periods ended December 31, 2007 was primarily due to growth in subscription revenue. These
increases were partly offset by declines in maintenance. Total revenue was favorably impacted by
foreign exchange of approximately $54 million and $109 million for the three and nine-month periods
ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
30
Subscription Revenue
Subscription revenue represents revenue that was ratably recognized during the period from
subscription license agreements that were in effect during the period. Subscription revenue also
includes maintenance
revenue that is bundled with, and not separately identifiable from, product sales in our
subscription license agreements.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, subscription revenue associated with sales made directly
to our end-user customers, which we define as our direct business,
was approximately $814 million
compared to approximately $711 million in the comparable prior year quarter. Sales made through our
channel partners, which we define as our indirect business, contributed approximately $80 million
to subscription revenue compared to $62 million in the comparable prior year period. The increase
was primarily attributable to a favorable impact from foreign exchange, as well as previous growth
in our one-tier channel business and higher subscription revenue associated with an increase in
deferred subscription value from contracts executed in the prior periods.
Subscription revenue for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 associated with our direct
and indirect businesses contributed approximately $2.3 billion and $235 million, respectively, as
compared to $2.1 billion and $162 million, respectively for the comparable prior year period. The
increases for the nine-month period are primarily attributable to the same factors as those
described above for the third quarter.
For the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, we added new deferred subscription
value related to our direct business of $1.02 billion and $2.49 billion, respectively, as compared
with $1.33 billion and $2.21 billion, respectively for the comparable prior year periods. The
decrease for the three months ended December 31, 2007 was principally due to the timing and size of
several large contracts renewed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007. For the nine months ended
December 31, 2007, the increase is principally attributable to managements more disciplined
approach to improving yields on enterprise renewals and our efforts to reduce bookings seasonality
in our renewal portfolio throughout our fiscal year. We believe that reducing the seasonality of
our bookings will help us improve our contract terms. While we continue to expect full year growth
in new deferred subscription value, we believe our efforts to reduce its seasonality may result in
lower new deferred subscription value during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 as compared to
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, we renewed
sixteen license agreements with contract values in excess of $10 million each, for an aggregate
contract value of approximately $303 million. This is compared to the third quarter in the prior
fiscal year,
when eighteen license agreements were executed with contract values in excess of $10 million each,
for an aggregate contract value of approximately $700 million.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the weighted average contract length declined to 3.16
years from 3.74 years for the quarter ended December 31, 2006. For the nine months ended December
31, 2007, the weighted average contract length declined to 3.21 years from 3.36 years in the
comparable prior year period. These declines are attributable to several large contracts executed
in the prior fiscal year with contract terms longer than the historical averages, including one
contract executed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007 in excess of $100 million and a contract
length of approximately seven years. The annualized new deferred subscription value for the third
quarter of fiscal year 2008 decreased approximately $32 million, or 9%, as compared with the
comparable prior year period, to $323 million also primarily due to several large contracts
executed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007.
With respect to our indirect business, we added new deferred subscription value of $32 million for
the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, as compared with $53 million in the comparable prior year
period. For the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we added new deferred
subscription value for our indirect business of approximately $104 million and $140 million,
respectively. The decline in new deferred subscription value for the indirect business was
principally the result of certain channel or commercial products being recognized on a perpetual
or up-front basis during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. See the discussion on Software
Fees and Other for further information on perpetual or up-front revenue.
Professional Services
Professional services revenue was relatively consistent in the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in professional services revenue for the
nine-months ended December 31, 2007 was attributable to professional service engagements relating
to product implementations associated
31
with recently acquired products, growth in security software
engagements which utilize Access Control and
Identity Management solutions, growth in IT Service and Asset Management solutions, and project and
portfolio management services tied to Clarity solutions.
Maintenance
Maintenance represents revenue associated with providing customer technical support and access to
software fixes and upgrades which is separately identifiable from software usage fees. The decrease
in maintenance revenue for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was primarily
attributable to the increased number of license agreements under our subscription model, where
maintenance is bundled with product sales. We are unable to quantify the impact on maintenance
revenue from the increase in subscription license agreements.
Software Fees and Other
Software fees and other revenue primarily consist of revenue that is recognized on an up-front
basis. This includes revenue generated through transactions with distribution and original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) channel partners (sometimes referred to as our indirect or channel
revenue) and certain revenue associated with new or acquired products sold on an up-front or
perpetual basis. Also included is financing fee revenue, which results from the discounting of
product sales recognized on a perpetual or up-front basis with extended payment terms to present
value. Revenue recognized on an up-front or perpetual basis results in higher revenue for the
period than if the same revenue had been recognized ratably under our subscription model.
With respect to revenue from newly acquired products where Vendor Specific Objective Evidence
(VSOE) of fair value has been established, our practice has been to record revenue initially on the
acquired companys systems, generally under a perpetual or up-front model. Within the first fiscal
year after the acquisition, new licenses for such products have historically been executed under
our subscription model, which incorporates the right to receive unspecified future software
products and therefore re quires the associated revenue to be recognized ratably. Earlier in fiscal
year 2008, we decided that some new and renewal contracts for newly developed and recently acquired
products will be sold, or continue to be sold, on a perpetual or up-front model and will not
include the right to unspecified future software products. As such, software license fees from
these contracts will continue to be recognized as Software fees and other.
Additionally, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, we decided that certain channel or
commercial products sold through two-tier distributors will no longer entitle the customer to
receive unspecified future software products. As such, license revenue from these sales where we
have established VSOE for maintenance will be recognized on a perpetual or up-front basis using the
residual method and reflected as Software fees and other. Maintenance revenue from such sales
will be deferred and recognized ratably and be reported as Maintenance revenue. For the three and
nine months ended December 31, 2007, revenue from our indirect business was favorably impacted by
approximately $6 million and $18 million, respectively, due to this change.
The increase in software fees and other revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2007 is
principally due to higher revenue from sales of indirect or channel products and was partly offset
by lower revenue from acquisitions which had transitioned to our business model. For the nine
months ended December 31, 2007, these increases were mostly offset by declines due to the
transition of acquired product sales to our subscription model, and a decline in financing fees.
For the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, we recorded revenue on an up-front
basis, relating to acquisitions, of approximately $11 million and $22 million, respectively, as
compared with approximately $13 million and $30 million, respectively, for the comparable prior
year periods. For the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, we recorded revenue on
an up-front basis from our indirect business of approximately $20 million and $51 million,
respectively, as compared with approximately $12 million and $32 million, respectively, for the
comparable prior year periods.
32
Total Revenue by Geography
The following table presents the revenue earned from the United States and international geographic
regions and corresponding percentage changes for the three and nine-month periods ended December
31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These comparisons of financial results are not necessarily
indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
United States |
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
International |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
International |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,192 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,938 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue in the United States increased by approximately $22 million, or 4%, and $83 million, or 5%,
respectively, for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 as compared with the
prior year comparable periods. The increase was primarily due to growth from acquisitions and
higher subscription revenue resulting from subscription licenses executed in prior periods.
International revenue increased by approximately $76 million, or 16%, and $171 million, or 13%,
respectively for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, principally due to the
favorable impacts from foreign exchange as well as higher subscription revenue associated with an
increase in deferred subscription value from contracts executed in prior periods, particularly in
Europe, Middle East and Asia.
Pricing changes do not have a material impact on revenue in a given period as a result of our
ratable subscription model.
33
Expenses:
The following tables present expenses for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007
and 2006, the period over period dollar change in expenses, the percentage dollar changes, and
expenses as a percentage of total revenue. These comparisons of financial results are not
necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
Percentage |
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
of |
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
Dollar |
|
Total |
|
|
Expense |
|
2007/ |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007/2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Costs of licensing and maintenance |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of capitalized software costs |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Product development and enhancements |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of
other intangible assets |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other expense , net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
before interest and
income taxes |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
Percentage |
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar |
|
of |
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
Dollar |
|
Total |
|
|
Expense |
|
2007/ |
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2007/2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of professional services |
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Costs of licensing and maintenance |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of capitalized software costs |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Product development and enhancements |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of
other intangible assets
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other expense (gains), net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Charge for in-process research and
development costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
before interest and
income taxes |
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Note amounts may not add to their respective totals due to rounding
34
Cost of Professional Services
Cost of professional services consists primarily of the personnel-related costs associated with
providing professional services and training to customers. The increase in cost of professional
services for the three- and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was primarily due to higher
personnel costs for additional staff during the three-month period, as well as an increase in the
use of external consultants during the nine-month period.
Costs of Licensing and Maintenance
Costs of licensing and maintenance includes technical support costs (previously reported as part of
Product development and enhancements), royalties (previously reported as part of Commissions,
royalties and bonuses), and other manufacturing and distribution costs (previously included within
Selling, general, and administrative). The remaining amounts previously reported under
Commissions, royalties and bonuses have been included with Selling, general and administrative
expenses. The increase in costs of licensing and maintenance for the three and nine-month periods
ended December 31, 2007 was primarily due to increased technical support costs for enhanced support agreements we sell to our customers and increases due to foreign currency
translation.
Amortization of Capitalized Software Costs
Amortization of capitalized software costs consists of the amortization of both purchased software
and internally generated capitalized software development costs. Internally generated capitalized
software development costs relate to new products and significant enhancements to existing software
products that have reached the technological feasibility stage. The decline in amortization of
capitalized software costs for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was
principally due to the full amortization of certain capitalized software costs related to prior
acquisitions.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A)
Despite an adverse impact of approximately $30 million from foreign currency translation, SG&A
declined in the three-month period ended December 2007 from the prior year period by approximately
$15 million. Excluding the negative impacts from foreign currency translation, the principal
reasons for the reduction in expenses included reduced personnel and office costs, mostly due to
savings realized in connection with the fiscal 2007 cost reduction and restructuring plan (the
Fiscal 2007 Plan), and lower promotion costs. In addition, bonuses were approximately $9 million
lower for the three months ended December 31, 2007, than for the comparable prior fiscal year
period primarily due to acquisition related retention bonuses accrued in the third quarter of
fiscal year 2007 that did not recur in fiscal year 2008. Offsetting these
declines was an approximate $6 million increase in bad debt expense, and an increase in sales
commissions of approximately $5 million. Sales commissions are expensed in the period in which they
are earned by employees, which is typically upon the signing of a contract.
The decline in SG&A for the nine months ended December 31, 2007 was primarily attributable to lower
personnel, office, and advertising costs, principally due to the same reasons noted above. Accrued
annual bonuses were approximately $6 million lower for the nine months ended December 31, 2007,
than for the comparable prior fiscal year period. Additionally, fees from professional service
providers declined approximately $12 million on a constant currency basis partially due to reduced
costs related to our enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Partially offsetting the declines
was an increase in the provision for bad debts of approximately $20 million principally due
to amounts deemed uncollectible from professional service accounts receivable and higher sales
commissions of approximately $16 million.
Product Development and Enhancements
For the quarters ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, product development and enhancement expenditures
represented approximately 12% and 13%, of total revenue in each quarterly period, respectively.
During the
35
third quarter of fiscal year 2008, we continued to focus on and invest in product development and
enhancements for emerging technologies and products from our recent acquisitions, as well as a
broadening of our enterprise product offerings.
Product development and enhancement expenditures for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 represented approximately 12% and 14% of total revenue, respectively, for each of the
nine-month periods.
Depreciation and Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
The increase in depreciation and amortization of other intangible assets for the three and
nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was primarily due to the amortization of intangibles
recognized in conjunction with recent acquisitions and costs capitalized in connection with our
continued investment in our ERP system.
Other Expenses (gains), net
Other expenses (gains), net includes gains and losses attributable to divested assets, certain
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and certain other infrequent events. For the three and
nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, we recorded foreign exchange gains of approximately $1
million and $19 million, respectively. Additionally, we incurred expenses associated with
litigation claims for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 of approximately $16
million and $29 million, respectively. Included in the costs for litigation claims was a charge of
approximately $14 million representing the present value of the obligation to pay additional
amounts in connection with a settlement agreement on our Senior Notes due in 2014. In the first
nine months of fiscal year 2007, we recognized a gain of approximately $14 million associated with
the sale of marketable securities.
Restructuring and Other
For the first nine months of fiscal year 2008, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately
$27 million for severance and other termination benefits and facility closures principally related
to the Fiscal 2007 Plan. Approximately $10 million of these charges were recorded in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2008. The total cost of the Fiscal 2007 Plan is currently expected to be
approximately $200 million, most of which is expected to be recognized by the end of fiscal year
2008. The Fiscal 2007 Plans objectives include a workforce reduction, global facilities
consolidations and other cost reduction initiatives. Cumulatively under the plan, we have incurred
approximately $174 million of expenses, of which approximately $68 million remains unpaid at
December 31, 2007. The severance portion of the remaining liability balance is included in the
Salaries, wages and commissions line on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. The facilities
portion of the remaining liability balance is included in Accrued expenses and other current
liabilities on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. Final payment of these amounts is
dependent upon settlement with the works councils in certain international locations and our
ability to negotiate lease terminations.
36
During the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 we incurred approximately $9 million in legal fees
in connection with matters under review by the Special Litigation Committee, composed of
independent members of the Board of Directors. Approximately $7 million of these charges were
recorded in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, we
recorded impairment charges of approximately $4 million, including approximately $2 million for a product that was discontinued.
During the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 we recorded an approximate $4 million loss related
to the sale of an investment in marketable securities associated with the closure of an
international location.
Interest Expense, net
The decrease in interest expense, net, for the three month period ended December 31, 2007 was
primarily due to an increase in average cash balances during the quarter, as compared with the
prior year quarter. The decrease in interest expense, net, for the nine-month periods ended
December 31, 2007 was primarily due to the same reasons noted above. Refer to the Liquidity and
Capital Resources section of this MD&A for additional information concerning our current debt
positions.
Income Taxes
Our income tax expense for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 was
approximately $76 million and $238 million, respectively. By comparison, our income tax expense for
the corresponding periods in our prior fiscal year was approximately $18 million and $40 million,
respectively. For the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007, our income tax
provision included charges of approximately $12 million and $23 million, respectively, associated
with certain corporate income tax rate reductions enacted in various non-US tax jurisdictions
during such periods (with corresponding impacts on our net deferred tax assets). In addition, our
income tax provision for the three and nine-month periods ending December 31, 2007 included a
credit of approximately $7 million and a net charge of approximately $3 million, respectively,
resulting from adjustments related to certain prior year non-US tax provisions. Also included in our
income tax provision for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 was an approximately $8 million tax
benefit resulting from the release of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets residing with our
Asia-Pacific subsidiaries. For the three-month period ended December 31, 2006, the tax provision
included a net benefit of approximately $5 million, primarily arising from a revision of our
estimated Section 199 manufacturing deduction. For the nine-month period ending December 31, 2006,
the tax provision included a net benefit of approximately $18 million, primarily arising from the
resolution of certain international and U.S. tax contingencies.
On April 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, which sets forth a comprehensive model for financial statement
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in income tax returns. For further information, see Note A, Basis of
Presentation in the notes to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements. As a result of our adoption FIN 48, there was an increase to retained earnings of
approximately $11 million and a corresponding decrease to tax liabilities. Upon adoption on April
1, 2007, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was approximately
$282 million and the deferred tax assets arising from such uncertain tax positions (from interest
and state income tax deductions) was approximately $48 million. If the unrecognized tax benefits
associated with these positions are ultimately recognized, they would primarily affect our
effective tax rate and our Stockholders Equity. In addition, consistent with the provisions of FIN
48, we reclassified approximately $243 million of income tax liabilities from current to
non-current liabilities as of April 1, 2007, because the cash payment of such liabilities was not
anticipated to occur within one year of the balance sheet date. All non-current income tax
liabilities are recorded in the Federal, state and foreign income taxes payable noncurrent line
in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our cash balances, including cash equivalents and marketable securities, are held in numerous
locations throughout the world, with approximately 61% residing outside the United States at
December 31, 2007. Cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $2.08 billion at December 31,
2007, representing a decline of $202 million from the March 31, 2007 balance of approximately $2.28
billion. The primary reason for the decline was the $500 million Accelerated Share Repurchase
program executed in June 2007. See Liquidity and Capital Resources, Share repurchases, Stock Option Exercises and Dividends, for
additional information.
37
Sources and Uses of Cash
Cash provided by continuing operating activities was $413 million and $547 million for the
nine-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash provided by or used in
operating activities is impacted by the timing and amount of customer receipts, vendor
disbursements, payroll and tax payments. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007,
accounts receivable, net of changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred subscription
and maintenance revenue and financing obligations, increased approximately $190 million, compared
to a decrease in the comparable prior year period of approximately $227 million. For the nine-month
period ended December 31, 2007, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities declined
approximately $91 million compared to a decline in the comparable prior year period of
approximately $107 million. Accounts payable declined more significantly in the prior fiscal year
principally as a result of managements determination that its payable cycle had exceeded an
optimal level and that the accounts payable balance should be reduced. For the third quarter of
fiscal year 2008 as compared the prior year period, cash flow was negatively affected by an
investment in working capital, the majority of which the Company expects to recover in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
Under our subscription licenses, customers generally make installment payments over the term of the
agreement for the right to use our software products and receive product support, software fixes
and new products when available. The timing and actual amounts of cash received from committed
customer installment payments under any specific license agreement can be impacted by several
factors, including the time value of money and the customers credit rating. Often, the amount
received is the result of direct negotiations with the customer when establishing pricing and
payment terms. In certain instances, the customer negotiates a price for a single up-front
installment payment and seeks its own internal or external financing sources. In other instances,
we may assist the customer by arranging financing on their behalf through a third-party financial
institution. Although the terms and conditions of the financing arrangement have been negotiated by
us with the financial institution, the decision of whether to enter into these types of financing
arrangements remains at the customers discretion. Alternatively, we may decide to transfer our
rights and title to the future committed installment payments due under the license agreement to a
third-party financial institution in exchange for a cash payment. In these instances, the license
agreements signed by the customer may contain provisions that allow for the assignment of our
financial interest without customer consent. Once transferred, the future committed installments
are payable by the customer to the third-party financial institution. Whether the future committed
installments have been financed directly by the customer with our assistance or by the transfer of
our rights and title to future committed installments to a third-party financial institution, such
financing agreements may contain limited recourse provisions with respect to our continued
performance under the license agreements. Based on our historical experience, we believe that any
liability which may be incurred as a result of these limited recourse provisions will be
immaterial.
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) and Financing obligations (collected) represent the
amount of cash received from subscription license agreements in advance of revenue recognition.
Included in these lines are amounts received as a result of single installments for the entire
contract value, or a substantial portion of the contract value, rather than being invoiced and
collected over the term of the license agreement. Amounts received in the current period that are
attributable to later years of a license agreement from either a customer or third-party financing
institution have a positive impact in the current period on billings and cash provided by
continuing operating activities. Accordingly, to the extent such collections are attributable to
the later years of a license
agreement, billings and cash provided by operating activities during the licenses later years will
be lower than if the payments were collected as installment payments over the license term.
The aggregate balance of Deferred subscription revenue (collected), current and Deferred
subscription revenue (collected), noncurrent declined approximately $169 million, or 8%, to $2.08
billion at December 31, 2007, while the aggregate balance of Financing obligations (collected),
current and Financing obligations (collected), noncurrent decreased approximately $39 million to
approximately $63 million as of December 31, 2007. We are unable to quantify the incremental amount
of cash received from single
38
installments above what would otherwise have been received if the installments were billed over the
respective terms of the agreements. We are also unable to predict the amount of cash to be
collected from single installments for the entire contract value, or a substantial portion of the
contract value, under new or renewed license agreements to be executed in future periods.
For the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, gross receipts related to single installments for the
entire contract value, or a substantial portion of the contract value, were approximately $103
million, compared to approximately $284 million in the comparable prior year period. The decrease
was principally due to a decline in the number and the aggregate amount of single installment
contracts executed and billed within the quarter. Included in the collections from single
installments for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 were transactions financed through third
parties of approximately $40 million. We did not transfer our financial interest in any committed
payments to a third-party financial institution during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. For
the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, five customers each represented more than 15% of the gross
receipts from single installment payments.
For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, gross receipts related to single installments
for the entire contract value, or a substantial portion of the contract value, were approximately
$351 million, as compared to approximately $493 million in the comparable prior year period. The
$142 million decrease was principally due to lower collections during the current fiscal year from
single installment contracts billed in the prior fiscal year which declined approximately $83
million, to approximately $7 million in fiscal year 2008. Also contributing to the decrease was a
decline in the aggregate amount of single installment contracts executed and billed within the
current fiscal year which resulted in lower collections of approximately $59 million. Included
within the collections from single installments for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 were
transactions financed through third parties of approximately $171 million and receipts from the
transfer of our financial interest in committed payments to a third-party financial institution of
approximately $14 million. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, one customer
represented more than 15% of the gross receipts from single installment payments.
In any quarter, we may receive payments in advance of the contractually committed date on which the
payments were otherwise due. In limited circumstances, we may offer discounts to customers to
ensure payment in the current period of invoices which have been billed, but which might not
otherwise be paid until a subsequent period because of payment terms or other factors. Any such
discounts offered in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 were not significant.
Our estimate of the fair value of net installment accounts receivable recorded under our prior
business model approximates carrying value. Amounts due from customers under our subscription model
are offset by deferred subscription value related to these license agreements, leaving no or
minimal net carrying value on the balance sheet for such amounts. The fair value of such amounts
may exceed this carrying value but cannot be practically assessed since there is no existing market
for a pool of customer receivables with contractual commitments similar to those owned by us. The
actual fair value of these amounts may not be known until these amounts are sold, securitized or
collected. Although these customer license agreements commit the customer to payment under fixed
schedules, the agreements are considered executory in nature due to our ongoing commitment to
provide unspecified future products as part of the agreement terms.
We can estimate the total amounts to be billed or collected at the conclusion of a reporting
period. Amounts we expect to bill within the next twelve months at December 31, 2007 increased by
approximately $256 million to approximately $1.93 billion from the end of the prior fiscal year
primarily due to the reduction in receipts of single installments of the total contract value or a
substantial portion of the contract value as compared to the prior year period. Amounts we expect
to bill beyond the next 12 months decreased by approximately $11 million to $1.70 billion. The
estimated amounts expected to be collected and a reconciliation of such amounts to the amounts we
recorded as accounts receivable are as follows:
39
Reconciliation of Amounts to be Collected to Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
(in millions) |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Amounts to
be billed within the next 12 months
business model |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
Amounts to be billed within the next 12 months prior
business model |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts expected to be collected current |
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Unearned maintenance |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Deferred subscription revenue current, billed |
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
(567 |
) |
Deferred subscription value current, uncollected |
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
Deferred subscription value noncurrent, uncollected,
Related to current accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and installment accounts receivable current, net |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts to
be billed beyond the next 12 months
business model |
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
Amounts to be billed beyond the next 12 months prior
business model |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts expected to be collected noncurrent |
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Unearned maintenance |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Deferred subscription value noncurrent, uncollected |
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
(1,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment accounts receivable noncurrent, net |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred Subscription Value: |
(in millions) |
|
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) current |
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
Deferred subscription revenue (collected) noncurrent |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
Deferred subscription revenue current, billed |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
Deferred subscription value current, uncollected |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
Deferred subscription value noncurrent, uncollected,
related to current accounts receivable |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
Deferred subscription value noncurrent, uncollected |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
Financing obligation (collected) current |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Financing obligations (collected) noncurrent |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate deferred subscription value balance |
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
In any fiscal year, cash generated by continuing operating activities typically increases in each
consecutive quarter throughout the fiscal year, with the fourth quarter being the highest and the
first quarter being the lowest and potentially negative. The timing of cash generated during the
fiscal year is impacted by many
factors, including the timing of new or renewed contracts and the associated billings, as well as
the timing of any customer financing or the transfer of our financial interest in such contractual
installments. Other factors that influence the levels of cash generated throughout the quarter can
include the level and timing of expenditures.
First Nine Months Comparison Fiscal Year 2008 versus Fiscal Year 2007
Operating Activities:
Cash provided by operating activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 was $413
million, representing a decline of approximately $134 million as compared to the comparable prior
year period. The primary reason for the decline was lower cash collections from customers of
approximately $186 million, principally due to a decline in the level of single installment
contracts. In addition, the decline was also attributable to higher disbursements for restructuring
of approximately $15 million and a disbursement to settle intellectual property claims asserted in
an arbitration dispute of approximately $16 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008.
Partially offsetting the above were lower disbursements to vendors and lower payroll related
disbursements of approximately $84 million.
Investing Activities:
Cash used in investing activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 was $162 million as
compared to $106 million for the comparable prior year period. The primary drivers were lower
proceeds on the sale of assets of $183 million, principally due to the sale-leaseback of the our
corporate headquarters in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 for approximately $201 million,
and lower net proceeds from the sale of marketable securities of $47 million. Partially offsetting
the above were lower disbursements for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and the settlement of
purchase accounting liabilities of approximately $146 million and $11 million, respectively.
Financing Activities:
Cash used in financing activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008 was $555 million
compared to $509 million in the comparable prior year period. For the first nine months of fiscal
year 2008, we repurchased approximately $500 million of our own common stock, as compared to $1.21
billion in the comparable prior year period. Partially offsetting the share repurchases in fiscal
year 2007 was an increase in borrowings of approximately $751 million under our 2004 Revolving
Credit Facility. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, we repaid our 2004 Revolving Credit
Facility with proceeds from our new 2008 Revolving Credit Facility.
Third Quarter Comparison Fiscal Year 2008 versus Fiscal Year 2007
Operating Activities:
Cash provided by operating activities for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 was $233 million,
representing a decline of approximately $352 million as compared to the comparable prior year
period. The primary reason for the decline was lower collections from customers of $313 million
principally due to a decline in the level of single installment contracts and a reduction in new
deferred subscription value as compared to the prior year quarter. The decline was also partially
attributable to higher disbursements to vendors of approximately $37 million. Partially offsetting
the above was a decline in net taxes paid of approximately $20 million, principally due to the
receipt of a $45 million refund in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 pertaining to an
overpayment in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008 for estimated taxes related to fiscal year
2007 activity.
Investing Activities:
Cash used in investing activities for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 was $46 million as
compared to $71 million for the comparable prior year period. The improvement was primarily a
result of lower disbursement for property and equipment of $11 million and an increase in proceeds
on the sale of assets of $8 million.
Financing Activities:
Cash used in financing activities for the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 was $18 million
compared to $20 million in the comparable prior year period. Amounts paid for dividends were
consistent for both periods.
41
Debt Arrangements
As of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2007, our debt arrangements consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
Maximum |
|
Outstanding |
|
Maximum |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Available |
|
Balance |
|
Available |
|
Balance |
|
|
(in millions) |
Debt Arrangements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Revolving Credit Facility (terminated in
August 2007) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
2008 Revolving Credit Facility (expires August 2012) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.500% Senior Notes due April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
4.750% Senior Notes due December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
1.625% Convertible Senior Notes due December 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
6.125% Senior Notes due December 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
International line of credit |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt arrangements at December 31, 2007 remain unchanged from March 31, 2007, except as follows:
Senior Notes Due 2014
In May 2007, a lawsuit captioned The Bank of New York v. CA, Inc. et al., was filed in the Supreme
Court of the State of New York, New York County. The complaint sought unspecified damages and other
relief, including acceleration of principal, based upon a claim for breach of contract.
Specifically, the complaint alleged that we failed to comply with certain purported obligations in
connection with our 5.625% Senior Notes due 2014 (the Notes), issued in November 2004, insofar as
we failed to carry out a purported obligation to cause a registration statement to become effective
to permit the exchange of the Notes for substantially similar securities of the Company registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 that would be freely tradable, and, having failed to effect such
exchange offer, failed to carry out the purported obligation to pay additional interest of 0.50%
per annum after November 18, 2006. CA denied that any such breach had occurred. On December 21,
2007, we, The Bank of New York, and the holders of a majority of the Notes reached a settlement of
this litigation and executed a First Supplemental Indenture. The Supplemental Indenture provides,
among other things, that we will pay an additional 0.50% per annum interest on the $500 million
principal of the Notes, with such additional interest began to accrue as of December 1, 2007.
Pursuant to the Supplemental Indenture, the Notes will now be referred to as the Companys 6.125%
Senior Notes Due 2014. As a result of the settlement in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, we
recorded a charge of approximately $14 million, representing the present value of the additional
amounts that will be paid. This charge is included in Other expenses (gains), net line items in the Consolidated
Condensed Statement of Operations. In connection with the settlement, we also entered into an
Addendum to Registration Rights Agreement relating to the Notes (The Addendum). The Addendum
confirms that we no longer have any obligations under the original Registration Rights Agreement
entered into with respect to the Notes. The settlement became effective upon the signature of the
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice by Justice Ramos of the New York Supreme Court on January 3, 2008.
2008 Revolving Credit Facility
In August 2007, we entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility (the 2008 Revolving Credit
Facility). The maximum committed amount available under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility is $1
billion, exclusive of incremental credit increases of up to an additional $500 million which are
available subject to certain conditions and the agreement of our lenders. The 2008 Revolving Credit
Facility replaces the prior $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (the 2004
Revolving Credit Facility) that was due to expire on December 2, 2008. The 2004 Revolving Credit
Facility was terminated effective August 29, 2007, at which time outstanding borrowings of $750
million were repaid and simultaneously re-borrowed under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility. The
2008 Revolving Credit Facility expires August 29, 2012. As of December 31, 2007, $750 million was
drawn down under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility.
42
Borrowings under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate dependent on our credit
ratings at the time of such borrowings and are calculated according to a base rate or a
Eurocurrency rate, as the case may be, plus an applicable margin and utilization fee. The
applicable margin for a base rate borrowing is 0.0% and, depending on our credit rating, the
applicable margin for a Eurocurrency borrowing ranges from 0.27% to 0.875%. Also, depending on our
credit rating at the time of the borrowing, the utilization fee can range from 0.10% to 0.125% for
borrowings over 50% of the total commitment. At our current credit ratings as of November 2007, the
applicable margin is 0% for a base rate borrowing and 0.60% for a Eurocurrency borrowing, and the
utilization fee is 0.125%. Our current borrowings rate for December 2007 is 5.52%. In addition, we
must pay facility commitment fees quarterly at rates dependent on our credit ratings. The facility
commitment fees can range from 0.08% to 0.375% of the final allocated amount of each Lenders full
revolving credit commitment (without taking into account any outstanding borrowings under such
commitments). Based on our current credit ratings as of December 2007, the facility commitment fee
is 0.15% of the $1 billion committed amount.
The 2008 Revolving Credit Facility contains customary covenants for transactions of this type,
including two financial covenants: (i) for the 12 months ending each quarter-end, the ratio of
consolidated debt for borrowed money to consolidated cash flow, each as defined in the 2008
Revolving Credit Facility, must not exceed 4.00 to 1.00; and (ii) for the 12 months ending each
quarter-end, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to the sum of interest payable on, and
amortization of debt discount in respect of, all consolidated debt for borrowed money, as defined
in the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility, must not be less than 5.00 to 1.00. In addition, as a
condition precedent to each borrowing made under the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility, as of the date
of such borrowing, (i) no event of default shall have occurred and be continuing and (ii) we are to
reaffirm that the representations and warranties we made in the 2008 Revolving Credit Facility
(other than the representation with respect to material adverse changes, but including the
representation regarding the absence of certain material litigation) are correct. As of December
31, 2007 we are in compliance with these debt covenants.
In September 2006, we drew down $750 million on the 2004 Revolving Credit Facility in order to
finance a portion of the $1 billion tender offer, which is further described in the Stock
repurchase section of Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies in our 2007 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
International Line of Credit
An unsecured and uncommitted multi-currency line of credit is available to meet short-term working
capital needs for our subsidiaries operating outside the United States. The line of credit is
available on an offering basis, meaning that transactions under the line of credit will be on such
terms and conditions, including interest rate, maturity, representations, covenants and events of
default, as mutually agreed between our subsidiaries and the local banks at the time of each
specific transaction. As of December 31, 2007, the amount available under this line totaled
approximately $25 million and approximately $3 million was pledged in support of bank guarantees.
Amounts drawn under these facilities as of December 31, 2007 were minimal.
In addition to the above facility, we use guarantees and letters of credit issued by financial
institutions to guarantee performance on certain contracts. At December 31, 2007, none of these
arrangements had been drawn down by third parties.
For further information concerning our debt arrangements, refer to our Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007.
Other Matters
At December 31, 2007, our senior unsecured notes were rated Ba1, BB, and BB+ by Moodys Investor
Service (Moodys), Standard and Poors (S&P) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch), respectively. The outlook
on these unsecured notes was negative by Moodys and was stable by S&P and Fitch. As of January
2008, our rating
and outlook remained unchanged. Peak borrowings under all debt facilities for the third quarter of
fiscal year 2008 totaled approximately $2.6 billion, with a weighted average interest rate of 5.3%.
43
Our capital resource requirements as of December 31, 2007 consisted of lease obligations for office
space, equipment, mortgage and loan obligations, our ERP implementation, and amounts due as a
result of product and company acquisitions.
We expect that existing cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, the availability of
borrowings under existing and renewable credit lines, and cash expected to be provided from
operations will be sufficient to meet ongoing cash requirements. We expect our long-standing
history of providing extended payment terms to our customers to continue.
We expect to use existing cash balances and future cash generated from operations to fund financing
activities such as the repayment of our debt balances as they mature, the payment of dividends, and
the potential repurchase of shares of common stock in accordance with plans approved by our Board
of Directors. Cash generated will also be used for investing activities such as future
acquisitions as well as additional capital spending, including our continued investment in our ERP
implementation.
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes
There was a $106 million favorable impact to our cash balance in the first nine months of fiscal
year 2008 which was predominantly due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro,
Australian dollar and Canadian dollar of approximately 9%, 8%, and 16%. respectively, and higher
international cash balances in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 as compared to the prior year
comparable period. This is compared to a favorable cash impact of approximately $70 million in the
comparable prior period, which was also due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the British
pound and the euro of approximately 13% and 9%, respectively.
Share Repurchases, Stock Option Exercises and Dividends
In November 2007, we concluded our previously announced $500 million Accelerated Share Repurchase
program (ASR) with a third-party financial institution. In June 2007, we paid $500 million to
repurchase shares of our common stock and received approximately 16.9 million shares at inception.
Based on the terms of the agreement between us and the third-party financial institution, we
received approximately 3.0 million additional shares of our common stock at the conclusion of the
program in November 2007 at no additional cost. The average price paid under the ASR was $25.13 per
share and total shares repurchased was approximately 19.9 million. Our remaining authority under
the previously authorized plan to repurchase up to $2 billion shares of common stock has expired.
Any potential future repurchases will be considered by us in the normal course of business.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BUSINESS PRACTICES
A detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies and the use of estimates in applying
those policies is included in our Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2007. Many of these
accounting policies involve complex situations and require a high degree of judgment, either in the
application and interpretation of existing accounting literature or in the development of estimates
that impact our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments
based on historical experience as well as other factors that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. These estimates may change in the future if underlying assumptions or factors
change.
The following is a summary of the critical accounting policies for which estimates were updated as
of December 31, 2007.
Revenue Recognition
We generate revenue from the following primary sources: (1) licensing software products; (2)
providing customer technical support (referred to as maintenance); and (3) providing professional
services, such as consulting and education. Revenue is recorded net of applicable sales taxes.
We recognize revenue pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position 97-2 Software Revenue
Recognition (SOP 97-2), issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
amended by SOP 98-9 Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to
Certain Transactions. In accordance with SOP 97-2, we begin to recognize revenue from licensing
and supporting
44
our software products when all of the following criteria are met: (1) we have
evidence of an arrangement with a customer; (2) we deliver the products; (3) license agreement
terms are deemed fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or uncertainties that may alter
the agreement such that it may not be complete and final; and (4) collection is probable.
Under our subscription model, implemented in October 2000, software license agreements typically
combine the right to use specified software products, the right to maintenance, and the right to
receive and use unspecified future software products for no additional fee during the term of the
agreement. Under these subscription licenses, once all four of the above noted revenue recognition
criteria are met, we are required under generally accepted accounting principles to recognize
revenue ratably over the term of the license agreement.
For license agreements signed prior to October 2000, once all four of the above noted revenue
recognition criteria were met, software license fees were recognized as revenue generally when the
software was delivered to the customer, or up-front (as the contracts did not include a right to
unspecified software products), and the maintenance fees were deferred and subsequently recognized
as revenue over the term of the license. Under our current business model, a relatively small
percentage of our revenue from software licenses is recognized on an up-front or perpetual basis,
subject to meeting the same revenue recognition criteria in accordance with SOP 97-2 as described
above. Software fees from such licenses are recognized up-front and are reported in the Software
fees and other line of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. Maintenance fees from
such licenses are recognized ratably over the term of the license and are recorded on the
Maintenance line item in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. License agreements
under which software fees are recognized up-front do not include the right to receive unspecified
future software products. However, in the event such license agreements are executed within close
proximity or in contemplation of other license agreements that are signed under our subscription
model with the same customer, the licenses together may be deemed a single multi-element agreement,
and all such revenue is required to be recognized ratably and is recorded as Subscription revenue
in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations.
Since we implemented our subscription model in October 2000, our practice with respect to newly
acquired products with established VSOE of fair value has been to record revenue initially on the
acquired companys systems, generally under a perpetual or up-front model; and, starting within the
first fiscal year after the acquisition, to enter new licenses for such products under our
subscription model, following which revenue is recognized ratably and recorded as subscription
revenue. In some instances, we sell some newly developed and recently acquired products on a
perpetual or up-front model. The software license fees from these contracts are recorded on an
up-front basis as Software fees and other. Selling such licenses under an up-front model may
result in higher total revenue in a reporting period than if such licenses were based on our
subscription model and the associated revenue recognized ratably.
Maintenance revenue is derived from two primary sources: (1) the maintenance portion of combined
license and maintenance agreements recorded under the prior business model or newly developed and
recently acquired products sold on a perpetual or up-front model; and (2) stand-alone maintenance
agreements. Maintenance revenue from these types of agreements is recognized on the Maintenance
line item in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations over the term of the renewal
agreement.
Under the prior business model, maintenance and license fees were generally combined into a single
license agreement. The maintenance portion was deferred and amortized into revenue over the initial
license agreement term. Some of these license agreements have not reached the end of their initial
terms and, therefore, continue to amortize. This amortization is recorded on the Maintenance line
item in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations. The deferred maintenance portion was
determined using its fair value based on annual, fixed maintenance renewal rates stated in the
agreement. For license agreements entered into under our subscription model, maintenance and
license fees continue to be
combined; however, the maintenance is inclusive for the entire term. We report such combined
license and maintenance fees on the Subscription revenue line item in the Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Operations.
45
The Deferred maintenance revenue line item on our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
principally represents payments received in advance of maintenance services rendered.
Revenue from professional service arrangements is generally recognized as the services are
performed. Revenue from committed professional services that are sold as part of a software
transaction is deferred and recognized on a ratable basis over the life of the related software
transaction. If it is not probable that a project will be completed or the payment will be
received, revenue is deferred until the uncertainty is removed.
Revenue from sales to distributors, resellers, and VARs commences when all four of the SOP 97-2
revenue recognition criteria noted above are met and when these entities sell the software product
to their customers. This is commonly referred to as the sell-through method. Revenue from the sale
of products to distributors, resellers and VARs that incorporates the right for the end-users to
receive certain unspecified future software products is recognized on a ratable basis.
We have an established business practice of offering installment payment options to customers and
have a history of successfully collecting substantially all amounts due under such agreements. We
assess collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the
customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If, in our judgment, collection of a fee is not
probable, we will not recognize revenue until the uncertainty is removed through the receipt of
cash payment.
Our standard licensing agreements include a product warranty provision for all products. Such
warranties are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The
likelihood that we would be required to make refunds to customers under such provisions is
considered remote.
Under the terms of substantially all of our license agreements, we have agreed to indemnify
customers for costs and damages arising from claims against such customers based on, among other
things, allegations that our software products infringe the intellectual property rights of a third
party. In most cases, in the event of an infringement claim, we retain the right to (i) procure for
the customer the right to continue using the software product; (ii) replace or modify the software
product to eliminate the infringement while providing substantially equivalent functionality; or
(iii) if neither (i) nor (ii) can be reasonably achieved, we may terminate the license agreement
and refund to the customer a pro-rata portion of the fees paid. Such indemnification provisions are
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5. The likelihood that we would be required to make
refunds to customers under such provisions is considered remote. In most cases and where legally
enforceable, the indemnification is limited to the amount paid by the customer.
Accounts Receivable
The allowance for doubtful accounts is a valuation account used to reserve for the potential
impairment of accounts receivable on the balance sheet. In developing the estimate for the
allowance for doubtful accounts, we rely on several factors, including:
|
|
|
Historical information, such as general collection history of multi-year software agreements; |
|
|
|
|
Current customer information and events, such as extended delinquency, requests for
restructuring, and filings for bankruptcy; |
|
|
|
|
Results of analyzing historical and current data; and |
|
|
|
|
The overall macroeconomic environment. |
The allowance is composed of two components: (a) specifically identified receivables that are
reviewed for impairment when, based on current information, we do not expect to collect the full
amount due from the customer; and (b) an allowance for losses inherent in the remaining receivable
portfolio-based historical activity.
Under our subscription model, amounts due from customers are offset by deferred subscription value
(unearned revenue) related to these amounts, resulting in little or no net carrying value on the
balance sheet. Therefore, a smaller allowance for doubtful accounts is required.
Income Taxes
When we prepare our consolidated condensed financial statements, we estimate our income taxes in
each jurisdiction in which we operate. On April 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board
46
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). Among other things FIN 48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not
threshold for the recognition and derecognition of tax positions, provides guidance on the
accounting for interest and penalties relating to tax positions and requires that the cumulative
effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 shall be reported as an adjustment to the opening
balance of retained earnings or other appropriate components of equity or net assets in the
statement of financial position.
FIN 48, in conjunction with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires us to estimate
our actual current tax liability in each jurisdiction; estimate differences resulting from
differing treatment of items for financial statement purposes versus tax return purposes (known as
temporary differences), which result in deferred tax assets and liabilities; and assess the
likelihood that our deferred tax assets and net operating losses will be recovered from future
taxable income. If we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. We
have recognized as a deferred tax asset a portion of the tax benefits connected with losses related
to operations. As of December 31, 2007, our gross deferred tax assets, net of a valuation
allowance, totaled $806 million. Realization of these deferred tax assets assumes that we will be
able to generate sufficient future taxable income so that these assets will be realized. The
factors that we consider in assessing the likelihood of realization include the forecast of future
taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the
deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax assets result from acquisition expenses, such as duplicate facility costs, employee
severance and other costs that are not deductible until paid, net operating losses (NOLs) and
temporary differences between the taxable cash payments received from customers and the ratable
recognition of revenue in accordance with GAAP. The NOLs expire between fiscal years 2008 and 2027.
Additionally, approximately $61 million of the valuation allowance at December 31, 2007 and March
31, 2007 is attributable to acquired NOLs which are subject to annual limitations under IRS Code
Section 382. Future results may vary from these estimates.
Goodwill, Capitalized Software Products, and Other Intangible Assets
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), requires an impairment-only
approach to accounting for goodwill and other intangibles with an indefinite life. Absent any prior
indicators of impairment, we perform an annual impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of our
fiscal year.
The SFAS No. 142 goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. The first step is used to
identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its net book
value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount,
goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment
test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second
step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting
units goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting
units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized
in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same
manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination; that is, the fair value of
the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any
unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the
reporting unit.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment
test, and determining the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit
(including unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test,
is judgmental in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These
estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether an impairment charge is
recognized and the magnitude of any such charge. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined
using discounted cash flow and are based on our best estimates of future revenue and operating
costs and general market conditions. These estimates are subject to review and approval by senior
management. This approach uses significant assumptions, including projected future cash flow, the
discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flow, and a terminal growth rate.
There was no impairment charge recorded with respect to goodwill for the first nine months of
fiscal year 2008.
47
The carrying value of capitalized software products, for both purchased software and internally
developed software, and other intangible assets, are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence
of internal and external facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The facts and
circumstances considered include an assessment of the net realizable value for capitalized software
products and the future recoverability of cost for other intangible assets as of the balance sheet
date. It is not possible for us to predict the likelihood of any possible future impairments or, if
such an impairment were to occur, the magnitude thereof.
Intangible assets with finite useful lives are subject to amortization over the expected period of
economic benefit to the Company. We evaluate the remaining useful lives of intangible assets to
determine whether events or circumstances have occurred that warrant a revision to the remaining
period of amortization. In cases where a revision to the remaining period of amortization is
deemed appropriate, the remaining carrying amounts of the intangible assets are amortized over the
revised remaining useful life.
Accounting for Business Combinations
The allocation of the purchase price for acquisitions requires extensive use of accounting
estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price to the identifiable tangible and intangible
assets acquired, including in-process research and development, and liabilities assumed based on
their respective fair values.
Product Development and Enhancements
We account for product development and enhancements in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for
the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. SFAS No. 86 specifies
that costs incurred internally in researching and developing a computer software product should be
charged to expense until technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once
technological feasibility is established, all software costs are capitalized until the product is
available for general release to customers. Judgment is required in determining when technological
feasibility of a product is established and assumptions are used that reflect our best estimates.
If other assumptions had been used in the current period to estimate technological feasibility, the
reported product development and enhancement expense could have been impacted. Annual amortization
of capitalized software costs is the greater of the amount computed using the ratio that current
gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for
that product or the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the software
product, generally estimated to be five years from the date the product became available for
general release to customers. The Company amortized capitalized software costs using the
straight-line method in fiscal year 2007 and through the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, as
anticipated future revenue is projected to increase for several years considering the Company is
continuously integrating current software technology into new software products.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
We currently maintain several stock-based compensation plans. We use the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to compute the estimated fair value of certain stock-based awards. The
Black-Scholes model includes assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility, expected
lives, and risk-free interest rates. These assumptions reflect our best estimates, but these items
involve uncertainties based on market and other conditions outside of our control. As a result, if
other assumptions had been used, stock-based compensation expense could have been materially
impacted. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, stock-based
compensation expense could be materially impacted in future years.
As described in Note D, Accounting for Share-Based Compensation, in the Notes to the Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements, performance share units (PSUs) are awards under the long-term
incentive programs for senior executives where the number of shares or restricted shares, as
applicable, ultimately received by the employee depends on Company performance measured against
specified targets and will be determined after a three-year or one-year period as applicable. The
fair value of each award is estimated on the date that the performance targets are established
based on the fair value of our stock and our estimate of the level of achievement of our
performance targets. We are required to recalculate the fair value of issued PSUs each reporting
period until the underlying shares are granted. The adjustment is based on the quoted
market price of our stock on the reporting period date. Each quarter, we compare the actual
performance we expect to achieve with the performance targets.
48
Legal Contingencies
We are currently involved in various legal proceedings and claims. Periodically, we review the
status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential
loss from any legal proceeding or claim is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably
estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Significant judgment is required in both
the determination of the probability of a loss and the determination as to whether the amount of
loss is reasonably estimable. Due to the uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based
only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we
reassess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and claims, and may revise our
estimates. Such revisions could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial
condition. Refer to Note J, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Notes to the Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements for a description of our material legal proceedings.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No.
157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within
those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No.
159 permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will
be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 159 on
our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R).
SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The Statement also provides
guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and
determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 13, 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 141(R)
on our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 5, 2008. We are
currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 160 on our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
49
Item 3:
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to a variety of risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and
changes in the market value of our investments. In the normal course of business, we employ
established policies and procedures to manage these risks including the use of derivative
instruments. There have been no material changes in our foreign exchange risk management strategy
or our portfolio management strategy subsequent to March 31, 2007; therefore, the risk profile of
our market risk sensitive instruments remains substantially unchanged from the description in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2007.
Item 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as required by the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) as of the end of the period
covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that occurred during the period
covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
As previously disclosed in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006, the Company began the migration of certain financial and sales processing systems
to an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system at its North American operations in fiscal year
2007. This change in information system platform for the Companys financial and operational
systems is part of its on-going project to implement ERP at the Companys facilities worldwide.
Additional changes are planned for fiscal year 2008 and the Company will continue to monitor and
test the system as part of managements annual evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting.
50
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On April 9, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of New York against Rocket Software, Inc. (Rocket). On August 1, 2007, the Company filed
an amended complaint alleging that Rocket stole intellectual property associated with a number of
the Companys key database management software products. The amended complaint includes causes of
action for copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, and
unjust enrichment/restitution. In the amended complaint, CA seeks damages of at least $200 million
for Rockets alleged theft and misappropriation of CAs intellectual property, as well an
injunction preventing Rocket from continuing to distribute its database management software
products. On November 14, 2007, Rocket filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. As of
January 10, 2008, this motion was fully briefed and awaiting a decision by the Court. The parties
have also begun fact discovery, which is currently set to close on March 31, 2008. The Company can
make no prediction as to the outcome of this litigation including with respect to amounts to be
awarded if the Company prevails. Refer to Note J, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Notes to
the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for information regarding certain other legal
proceedings.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Current and potential stockholders should consider carefully the risks factors described in more
detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and as set forth
below. We believe that as of December 31, 2007, there has been no material change to this
information other than as described below. Any of these factors, or others, many of which are
beyond our control, could negatively affect our revenue, profitability and cash flow.
During the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2008 the Companys restructuring efforts in Asia have
focused on shifting our business model in certain smaller countries from a direct sales
force model to an indirect, partner led model. The Company may implement this strategy in other
regions in the future. Risks associated with this business model shift include the potential
inability of our partners to sell our products effectively and to provide adequate implementation services and
product support. A greater reliance on partners will also subject us to further third party risks
associated with business practices in those regions.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table sets forth, for the months indicated, our purchases of common stock in the
third quarter of fiscal year 2008:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans |
|
The Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share(1) |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs(1) |
|
|
(in thousands, except average price paid per share) |
October 1, 2007 October 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
November 1, 2007 November 30, 2007 |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
$ |
25.13 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
December 1,
2007 December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As part of the Accelerated Share Repurchase program (ASR) entered into in June 2007
with a third-party financial institution, we immediately paid $500 million and received an initial
16.9 million shares of the Companys common stock. In November 2007, the ASR program concluded, in
which an additional 3.0 million shares of the Companys common stock were received at no additional
costs. Under the ASR program, a total of approximately 19.9 million shares were repurchased with
an average price paid per share of $25.13. |
51
On June 29, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase up to $2 billion shares of
common stock in fiscal year 2007. This plan replaced the prior $600 million common stock
repurchase plan.
On August 15, 2006, we announced the commencement of a $1 billion tender offer to repurchase
outstanding common stock, at a price not less than $22.50 and not greater than $24.50 per share.
On September 14, 2006, the expiration date of the tender offer, we accepted for purchase 41,225,515
shares of common stock at a purchase price of $24.00 per share, for a total price of approximately
$989 million, which excludes bank, legal and other associated charges. Upon completion of the
tender offer, we retired all of the shares that were repurchased.
On May 23, 2007, we announced that as part of our previously authorized share repurchase plan of up
to $2 billion, we would repurchase up to $500 million of our shares under an Accelerated Share
Repurchase program (ASR).
On November 21, 2007, we concluded our previously announced $500 million Accelerated Share
Repurchase program (ASR) with a third-party financial institution. On June 20, 2007, we paid $500
million to repurchase shares of our common stock and received approximately 16.9 million shares at
inception. Based on the terms of the agreement between us and the third-party financial
institution, we received approximately 3.0 million additional shares of our common stock at the
conclusion of the program in November 2007 at no additional cost. The average price paid under the
ASR was $25.13 per share and total shares repurchased was approximately 19.9 million.
The remaining authority under the previously authorized plan to repurchase up to $2 billion shares
of common stock has expired. Any potential future repurchases will be considered by us in the
normal course of business.
52
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Regulation S-K |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated
as of November 30, 2007, to the
Indenture, dated as of November 18,
2004, between CA, Inc. and The Bank
of New York, as trustee.
|
|
Previously filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K
dated January 3,
2008 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Summary of Special Payment to the
non-executive Chairman of the
Board.
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Accountants acknowledgement letter.
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the CEO pursuant
to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the CFO pursuant
to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CA, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John A. Swainson
|
|
|
|
John A. Swainson |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Nancy E. Cooper
|
|
|
|
Nancy E. Cooper |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Dated: February 5, 2008
54