Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-10524
UDR, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
54-0857512 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation of organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1745 Shea Center
Drive, Suite 200, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129
|
(Address of
principal executive offices) (zip code)
|
(720) 283-6120
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers common stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding as of August 4, 2009, was 150,557,442.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for shara data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Audited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment |
|
$ |
5,720,069 |
|
|
$ |
5,644,930 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,214,447 |
) |
|
|
(1,078,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,505,622 |
|
|
|
4,566,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate under development
(net of accumulated depreciation of $1,123 and $52) |
|
|
248,335 |
|
|
|
186,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
4,753,957 |
|
|
|
4,753,064 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
12,740 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
8,795 |
|
|
|
7,726 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
26,561 |
|
|
|
29,168 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
207,450 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
63,475 |
|
|
|
47,048 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
71,848 |
|
|
|
85,842 |
|
Other assets real estate held for disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,970,898 |
|
|
$ |
5,143,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
1,729,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,462,471 |
|
Unsecured debt |
|
|
1,484,659 |
|
|
|
1,798,662 |
|
Real estate taxes payable |
|
|
18,665 |
|
|
|
14,035 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
18,717 |
|
|
|
20,744 |
|
Security deposits and prepaid rent |
|
|
30,843 |
|
|
|
28,829 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
30,386 |
|
|
|
57,144 |
|
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
28,835 |
|
|
|
28,845 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other
liabilities |
|
|
58,453 |
|
|
|
71,395 |
|
Other liabilities real estate held for disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,399,848 |
|
|
|
3,483,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
65,295 |
|
|
|
108,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,803,812 shares of 8.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible issued
and outstanding (2,803,812 shares at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
46,571 |
|
|
|
46,571 |
|
4,430,700 shares of 6.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable issued
and outstanding (4,430,700 shares at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
110,768 |
|
|
|
110,768 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,557,442 shares issued and outstanding (148,781,115 shares at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,871,525 |
|
|
|
1,850,871 |
|
Distributions in excess of net income |
|
|
(522,945 |
) |
|
|
(448,737 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net |
|
|
(5,112 |
) |
|
|
(11,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total UDR, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
1,502,313 |
|
|
|
1,549,034 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,505,755 |
|
|
|
1,552,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,970,898 |
|
|
$ |
5,143,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
In thousands, except per share amounts
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
151,843 |
|
|
$ |
139,955 |
|
|
$ |
302,458 |
|
|
$ |
266,541 |
|
Non-property income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
3,958 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
8,982 |
|
|
|
11,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
155,801 |
|
|
$ |
146,645 |
|
|
$ |
311,440 |
|
|
$ |
277,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance |
|
|
18,843 |
|
|
|
16,180 |
|
|
|
38,863 |
|
|
|
28,674 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
12,782 |
|
|
|
12,051 |
|
|
|
25,415 |
|
|
|
23,848 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
|
6,821 |
|
|
|
15,717 |
|
|
|
13,904 |
|
Repair and maintenance |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
7,436 |
|
|
|
15,108 |
|
|
|
14,226 |
|
Administrative and marketing |
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
6,917 |
|
|
|
7,149 |
|
Property management |
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
8,318 |
|
|
|
7,330 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
69,067 |
|
|
|
62,507 |
|
|
|
138,052 |
|
|
|
114,942 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred |
|
|
35,376 |
|
|
|
38,015 |
|
|
|
71,885 |
|
|
|
78,521 |
|
Gain on debt extinguishment |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(9,849 |
) |
|
|
(6,072 |
) |
Amortization of convertible debt premium |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9,145 |
|
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
19,700 |
|
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses |
|
|
169,786 |
|
|
|
162,960 |
|
|
|
337,912 |
|
|
|
309,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(13,985 |
) |
|
|
(16,315 |
) |
|
|
(26,472 |
) |
|
|
(31,607 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
Tax benefit/(expense) for TRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
4,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(14,713 |
) |
|
|
(13,681 |
) |
|
|
(27,968 |
) |
|
|
(28,082 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
13,316 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
800,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss)/income |
|
|
(12,660 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(26,083 |
) |
|
|
772,090 |
|
Net loss/(income) attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
(49,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
|
(12,058 |
) |
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
|
(24,687 |
) |
|
|
723,042 |
|
Distributions to preferred stockholders Series E (Convertible) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(1,862 |
) |
|
|
(1,862 |
) |
Distributions to preferred stockholders Series G |
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
(2,278 |
) |
|
|
(3,738 |
) |
|
|
(4,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(14,858 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,287 |
) |
|
$ |
716,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/earnings per weighted average common share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
( 0.60 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
Net (loss)/income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
5.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common distributions declared per share |
|
$ |
0.180 |
|
|
$ |
0.305 |
|
|
$ |
0.485 |
|
|
$ |
0.305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
149,444 |
|
|
|
137,969 |
|
|
|
148,564 |
|
|
|
140,257 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
149,444 |
|
|
|
137,969 |
|
|
|
148,564 |
|
|
|
140,257 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss)/income |
|
$ |
(26,083 |
) |
|
$ |
772,090 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
140,924 |
|
|
|
116,815 |
|
Net gains on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
(780,212 |
) |
Net gains on the sale of land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
Gains on debt extinguishment |
|
|
(9,849 |
) |
|
|
(6,072 |
) |
Write off of bad debt |
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Write off of note receivable and other assets |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
10,785 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
Amortization of convertible debt premium |
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
Prepayments/(refunds) on income taxes |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
(4,170 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in operating assets |
|
|
8,849 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
Decrease in operating liabilities |
|
|
(3,264 |
) |
|
|
(37,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
123,994 |
|
|
|
82,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate investments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,474,484 |
|
Proceeds from note receivable |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Disbursements related to notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,121 |
) |
Acquisition of real estate assets (net of liabilities assumed) and initial capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(642,046 |
) |
Development of real estate assets |
|
|
(97,761 |
) |
|
|
(58,640 |
) |
Capital expenditures and other major improvements real estate assets, net of escrow reimbursement |
|
|
(36,724 |
) |
|
|
(69,608 |
) |
Capital expenditures non-real estate assets |
|
|
(6,645 |
) |
|
|
(8,938 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
(17,341 |
) |
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
Purchase deposits on pending real estate acquisitions |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(5,978 |
) |
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(30,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in funds held in escrow from IRC Section 1031 exchanges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
10,090 |
|
|
|
500,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on secured debt |
|
|
(22,806 |
) |
|
|
(74,050 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt |
|
|
289,625 |
|
|
|
74,204 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of unsecured debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
Payments on unsecured debt |
|
|
(364,233 |
) |
|
|
(302,413 |
) |
Net (repayment)/proceeds of revolving bank debt |
|
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
(289,600 |
) |
Payment of financing costs |
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
|
|
(2,338 |
) |
(Payments on)/ proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
|
|
(1,253 |
) |
|
|
717 |
|
Repayment of the investment of performance based programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(4,159 |
) |
|
|
(5,993 |
) |
Distributions paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
|
(6,418 |
) |
Distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
|
(89,925 |
) |
|
|
(86,680 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(131,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(141,841 |
) |
|
|
(584,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,757 |
) |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
4,983 |
|
|
$ |
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period |
|
$ |
81,550 |
|
|
$ |
84,772 |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of operating partnership non-controlling interests to common stock
(1,816,698 shares in 2009 and 99,241 shares in 2008) |
|
|
17,259 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
Issuance of note receivable upon the disposition of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Secured debt assumed with the acquisition of properties, net of fair value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,728 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Non-controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,234,512 |
|
|
$ |
157,339 |
|
|
|
148,781,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,850,871 |
|
|
$ |
(448,737 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,927 |
) |
|
$ |
3,350 |
|
|
$ |
1,552,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(24,595 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivative
financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
Allocation to redeemable
non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,687 |
) |
|
|
6,815 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(17,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,629 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,273 |
|
Purchase of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
Adjustment for conversion of
non-controlling
Series B and C LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938 |
|
Adjustment for conversion of
non-controlling interests
of unitholders in operating partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,816,698 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,259 |
|
Common stock distributions declared
($0.485 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,554 |
) |
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series E ($0.6644 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,862 |
) |
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series G ($0.84375 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,738 |
) |
Adjustment to reflect redeemable
non-controlling
redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
|
7,234,512 |
|
|
$ |
157,339 |
|
|
|
150,557,442 |
|
|
$ |
1,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,871,525 |
|
|
$ |
(522,945 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,112 |
) |
|
$ |
3,442 |
|
|
$ |
1,505,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
UDR, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
1. CONSOLIDATION, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
UDR, Inc., collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries (we, our, us, the Company
or UDR) is a self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires,
renovates, develops, and manages apartment communities nationwide. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of UDR and its subsidiaries, including United Dominion
Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), and Heritage Communities L.P. (the Heritage OP). As
of June 30, 2009, there were 179,863,065 units in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which
173,736,146 units or 97% were owned by UDR and 6,126,919 units or 3% were owned by limited
partners. As of June 30, 2009, there were 6,264,460 units in the Heritage OP outstanding, of which
6,070,476 units or 97% were owned by UDR and 193,984 units or 3% were owned by limited partners.
The consolidated financial statements of UDR include the non-controlling interests of the
unitholders in the Operating Partnership and the Heritage OP.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed
or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of our financial
position as of June 30, 2009, and results of operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The
interim results presented are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for a full
year. The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in UDRs
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 22, 2009.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the interim unaudited consolidated
financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
amounts realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain previously reported amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling
(minority) interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that
a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary should be reported as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. Consolidated net income should include the net income for both the parent and
the non-controlling interest with disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of
operations. The calculation of earnings per share will continue to be based on income amounts
attributable to the parent. SFAS 160 was effective for us on
January 1, 2009. Due to the adoption of SFAS 160, loss from
continuing operations available to common stockholders per diluted share
decreased by $0.01 and $0.36 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively and income from discontinued
operations per diluted share increased by the same amounts. There was no
impact to net (loss)/income available to common stockholders
per diluted share due to the adoption of SFAS 160. As part of our
adoption of SFAS 160, we have retroactively adopted the measurement
provisions of EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.
Upon adoption, we adjusted the carrying amount of the operating partnership units by recognizing an
$86.8 million increase to Redeemable non-controlling interest in operating partnership on the
balance sheet and a corresponding decrease in Distributions in Excess of Net Income, which was
accounted for as a cumulative effect adjustment on January 1, 2006.
7
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (APB 14-1). APB 14-1 requires entities
that issued certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled or partially settled in cash
on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option)
components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing
rate. APB 14-1 requires that an entity determine the estimated fair value of a similar debt
instrument as of the date of the issuance without the conversion feature but inclusive of any other
embedded features such as puts and calls and assign that value to the debt component of the
instrument, which would result in a discount being recorded. The debt is subsequently accreted to
its par value over its expected life using the market rate at the date of issuance. The residual
value between the initial proceeds and the value allocated to the debt would be reflected in equity
as additional paid in capital. APB 14-1 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008 and was applied retrospectively to both new and existing convertible instruments. Due to
the adoption of APB 14-1, the Company recognized a decrease in Distributions in Excess of Net
Income of $117,000 on January 1, 2006 for the cumulative change in interest expense. We also
recorded a $32.6 million increase to Additional Paid in Capital for the allocation of the equity
component. The Company recognized an additional $2.7 million
($0.02 per diluted share) and $5.7 million
($0.04 per diluted share) and $1.7 million ($0.01 per diluted share) and $3.3 million ($0.02 per diluted share) of interest
expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively due to the adoption
of APB 14-1. This impact includes both regular amortization of
convertible debt premium and the effect of write offs due to
convertible debt repurchases.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, or the FSP, which for us was
effective January 1, 2009 and has been applied retrospectively. The FSP clarifies that unvested
share-based payment awards that participate in dividends similar to shares of common stock or
operating partnership units should be treated as participating securities. The FSP affects the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for unvested restricted stock awards which
entitle the holders to dividends. The FSP did not affect earnings per share amounts for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 because we reported a net loss for the period and accordingly
had no undistributed earnings. The FSP had an immaterial affect on the earnings per share amount
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. We do not expect the FSP to have a material
effect on future earnings per share amounts.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and
the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No.
162 (SFAS 168). The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) will become the
source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also
sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification will supersede all
then-existing, non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. SFAS 168 is effective for our financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods commencing with the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009. In the FASBs view, the issuance of SFAS 168 and the Codification will not
change GAAP, and therefore we do not expect the adoption of SFAS 168 to have an effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, which amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
as well as annual financial statements. This standard is effective for periods ending after June
15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the provisions of
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 result in additional
disclosures with respect to the fair value of the Companys financial instruments. See Note 8,
Fair Value of Derivatives and Financial Instruments, for these additional disclosures.
8
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165), which provides
guidance to establish general standards of accounting for, and disclosures of, events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or fiscal periods ending after June 15, 2009.
Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 165 on June 30, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. The Company evaluated subsequent events through August 6, 2009, the date of issuance of
the Companys financial statements. No recognized or non-recognized subsequent events were noted
other than the matter disclosed in Note 14, Subsequent Event.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), that
became effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures
about fair value measurement. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. In February
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2), that delayed the effective date of SFAS 157s fair value measurement requirements
for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. The adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities, as of
January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on our financial position or operations. Fair
value measurements identified in FSP 157-2 is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1,
2009 and did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), that became effective for our fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2008. SFAS 159 allows an entity to elect to measure certain financial instruments at
fair value. If this irrevocable election is made, an entity may apply SFAS 159 on an instrument by
instrument basis with a few exceptions and report any change in the fair value of the instrument in
earnings. The Company has not adopted the fair value measurement
option of SFAS 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, (SFAS 141R). SFAS
141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination, recognizing assets acquired and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, and determining what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
We believe that the adoption of SFAS 141R could materially impact our future consolidated financial
position and results of operations depending on the Companys acquisition activity as certain
acquisition costs that have historically been capitalized as part of the basis of the real estate
and amortized over the real estates useful life will now be expensed as incurred. SFAS 141R did
not have a material impact on our financial statements during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161), amends and expands
the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 133) with the intent to provide
users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for
under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161
is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, SFAS 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives
and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and
gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent
features in derivative instruments. See Note 9, Derivative and Hedging Activity, for these
additional disclosures.
9
On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46(R) (SFAS 167), which (1) addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept from FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and (2) responds to concerns about the application of
certain key provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, including concerns over the transparency of enterprises involvement with variable
interest entities (VIEs). SFAS 167 is effective beginning on January 1, 2010. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of SFAS 167.
Accounting Policies
Income Taxes
Due to the structure of the Company as a REIT and the nature of the operations for the
operating properties, no provision for federal income taxes has been provided for at UDR.
Historically, the Company has generally incurred only state and local income, excise and franchise
taxes. UDR elected for certain consolidated subsidiaries to be treated as Taxable REIT
Subsidiaries (TRS) relating to the Companys developer, RE3 and condominium conversion
activities.
Income taxes for our TRS are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax
rate is recognized in earnings in the period of the enactment date. The Companys deferred tax
assets are generally the result of differing depreciable lives on capitalized assets and timing of
expense recognition for certain accrued liabilities. As of June 30, 2009, UDR has recorded a
current tax liability of $3.1 million and a deferred tax asset of approximately $12.2 million and
recorded income tax expense of $0 and $51,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively.
UDR adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), on January
1, 2007. FIN 48 defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company recognizes our tax positions and evaluates them using a two-step process. First,
we determine whether a tax position is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent probability)
to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Then the Company will determine the
amount of benefit to recognize and record the amount that is more likely than not to be realized
upon ultimate settlement.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, UDR recognized no material adjustments to
liabilities related to unrecognized income tax benefits. At the adoption date, UDRs TRS had
$538,000 of net unrecognized tax benefits, which would favorably impact our effective tax rate if
recognized. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the liability was reversed due to the
Company no longer meeting the measurement criteria. As such, subsequent to June 30, 2008, UDR had
no unrecognized tax benefits, accrued interest or penalties. UDR and its subsidiaries are subject
to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The tax years
2004 2008 remain open to examination by the
major taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject. When applicable, UDR recognizes interest
and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
10
Real Estate Sales
The Company accounts for sales of real estate in accordance with FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate (SFAS 66). For sales
transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as the Company no
longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the related assets and liabilities
from our consolidated balance sheet and record the gain or loss in the period the transaction
closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to our
continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for the
transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales of real estate to entities in which we retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted
for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual
method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize
profit proportionate to the outside interest in the buyer and will defer the gain on the interest
we retain. The Company will recognize any deferred gain when the property is then sold to a third
party. In transactions accounted by us as partial sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority
equity interest in the venture was provided a preference as to cash flows in either an operating or
a capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the
extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the
entire property.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities represent publicly traded debt securities and are classified as
available for sale and carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
separate component of stockholders equity. Declines in the value of public and private
investments that management determines are other than temporary are recorded as a provision for
loss on investments. The amortization of any discount and interest income are recorded in Other
Income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 8,
Fair Value of Derivative and Financial
Instruments.
The Company has the ability to make public and private investments in equity and debt
securities. The publicly traded equity securities are classified as available-for-sale
securities and carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate
component of stockholders equity. For publicly traded debt securities, the Company initially
assesses our intent and ability to hold the debt instrument before determining the classification as
either held-to-maturity securities which would be reported at their amortized cost or as an
available-for-sale security. Private investments for which we lack the ability to exercise
significant influence are accounted for at cost.
11
2. REAL ESTATE
Real estate assets owned by the Company consist of income producing operating properties,
properties under development, land held for future development and properties deemed as held for
sale. As of June 30, 2009 the Company owned and consolidated 162 communities in 10 states plus the
District of Columbia totaling 44,701 apartment homes. The following table summarizes the carrying
amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,566,502 |
|
|
$ |
1,567,737 |
|
Depreciable property held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
3,922,191 |
|
|
|
3,859,245 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
231,376 |
|
|
|
217,948 |
|
Under development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
55,144 |
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
194,314 |
|
|
|
134,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned |
|
$ |
5,969,527 |
|
|
$ |
5,831,753 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,215,570 |
) |
|
|
(1,078,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned, net |
|
$ |
4,753,957 |
|
|
$ |
4,753,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations represent properties that UDR has either sold or which management
believes meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. In order to be classified as held
for sale and reported as discontinued operations, a propertys operations and cash flows have or
will be divested to a third party by the Company whereby UDR will not have any significant
continuing involvement in the ownership or operation of the property after the sale or disposition.
The results of operations of the property are presented as discontinued operations for all periods
presented and do not impact the net earnings reported by the Company. Once a property is deemed as
held for sale, depreciation is no longer recorded. However, if the Company determines that the
property no longer meets the criteria of held for sale the Company will recapture any unrecorded
depreciation for the property. The assets and liabilities of properties deemed as held for sale
are presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Properties deemed as held for sale
are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to
sell the assets.
UDR did not dispose of any communities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, nor did we
have any classified as held for disposition at June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30,
2008, UDR sold 85 communities with a total of 25,540 apartment homes, 42 condominiums from two
communities with a total of 640 condominiums, and one parcel of land. At June 30, 2008, UDR had
one community with a total of 144 apartment homes and a net book value of $4.7 million, a
commercial property with a net book value of $1.7 million, and two communities with a total of 537
condominiums and a net book value of $38.6 million included in real estate held for disposition.
The results of operations for these properties and the gain/loss from disposition are classified on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item titled Income from discontinued
operations, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008.
In conjunction with the sale of the 85 communities during the six months ended June 20, 2008,
the Company received a note in the amount of $200.0 million. On May 4, 2009, the Company received
from the buyer payment in full of the $200.0 million note, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon
in the amount of $123,287.
UDR has elected TRS status for certain of its corporate subsidiaries, primarily those engaged
in condominium conversion and development activities. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, UDR recognized an income tax expense of $0 and an income tax benefit of $3.7 million,
respectively, and an income tax expense of $51,000 and an income tax benefit of $5.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of the balance, UDR allocated no income
tax provision to discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, and an
income tax benefit of $35,000 and $161,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively.
12
The income attributable to discontinued operations is summarized as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39,571 |
|
Non-property income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,084 |
|
Property management fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
Real estate depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before net gain on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,960 |
|
Net gain on the sale of depreciable property, excluding RE3 |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
13,027 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
780,989 |
|
RE3 gain/(loss) on the sale of depreciable property, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
2,053 |
|
|
$ |
13 ,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,885 |
|
|
$ |
800,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. JOINT VENTURES
UDR has entered into joint ventures with unrelated third parties for real estate assets that
are either consolidated and included in real estate owned on our Consolidated Balance Sheets or are
accounted for under the equity method of accounting, which are not consolidated and are included in
investment in unconsolidated joint ventures on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company
consolidates an entity in which we own less than 100% but control the joint venture as well as any
variable interest entity where we are the primary beneficiary. In addition, the Company
consolidates any joint venture in which we are the general partner or managing member and the third
party does not have the ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process nor do
they have the ability to remove us as general partner or managing member, without cause.
UDRs joint ventures, some of which are variable interest entities, are funded with a
combination of debt and capital. The allocation between debt and capital will vary by joint venture
with our investments having a weighted average of 11% of the initial total assets as contributed
capital.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company recognizes earnings or losses from our investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures consisting of our proportionate share of the net earnings or loss of the joint venture.
In addition, we may earn fees for providing management and development services to the
unconsolidated joint ventures. As of June 30, 2009, UDR had investments in the following
unconsolidated development joint ventures which are accounted for under the equity method of
accounting.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture which is developing a 274
home apartment community in the central business district of Bellevue, Washington. Construction
began in the fourth quarter of 2006 and is scheduled for completion in the third quarter of 2009.
At closing and at June 30, 2009, we owned 49% of the joint venture. Our initial investment was
$10.0 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2009,
the Company made additional capital
contributions of $16.1 million to the joint venture to fund development costs. Our investment at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 was $28.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively.
13
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture which owns and operates a
23-story, 166 home high-rise apartment community in the central business district of Bellevue,
Washington. At closing, UDR owned 49% of the joint venture. Our initial investment was $11.8
million. Our investment at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $10.2 million and $10.4
million, respectively.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture which owns a site in
Bellevue, Washington. At closing and at June 30, 2009, we owned 49% of the joint venture. Our
initial investment was $5.7 million. Our investment at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
$10.0 million and $10.2 million, respectively. The Company initially planned to develop a 430 home
high rise apartment building with ground floor retail on an existing operating retail center.
However, during the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company decided to operate the retail
property as opposed to developing the site.
UDR and an unaffiliated third party in November 2007 formed a joint venture which owns and
operates various properties located in Texas. In November 2007, UDR sold nine operating
properties, consisting of 3,690 units, and contributed one property under development to the joint
venture. The property under development has 302 units and was completed in 2008 and commenced
lease up at that time. UDR contributed cash and property equal to 20% of the fair value of the
properties. The unaffiliated member contributed cash equal to 80% of the fair value of the
properties comprising the joint venture, which was then used to purchase the nine operating
properties from UDR. Our initial investment was $20.4 million. Our investment at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 was $14.9 million and $16.5 million, respectively.
Summarized financial information relating to 100% of all the unconsolidated joint ventures
operations (not just our proportionate share) is presented below as of and for the three and six
months ended June 30, (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
For the three months ended June 30,: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
11,517 |
|
|
$ |
10,588 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
6,019 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(3,541 |
) |
|
|
(4,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30,: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
23,037 |
|
|
$ |
20,905 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,387 |
|
|
|
11,416 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(6,427 |
) |
|
|
(8,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net |
|
$ |
532,121 |
|
|
$ |
517,549 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
544,259 |
|
|
|
534,751 |
|
Amount due to UDR |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
Third party debt |
|
|
380,353 |
|
|
|
373,353 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
396,267 |
|
|
|
397,135 |
|
Equity |
|
|
147,992 |
|
|
|
137,616 |
|
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had deferred profit from the sale of properties of $28.8
million, which the Company will not recognize until the underlying property is sold to a third
party. The Company recognized $513,000 and $987,000 and $648,000 and $1.2 million of management
fees for our involvement in the joint ventures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
The Company may be required to make additional capital contributions to certain of our joint
ventures should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund development costs or
operating shortfalls.
14
5. SECURED DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of
classification of the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Company having effectively
established the interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured debt on continuing and
discontinued operations, which encumbers $2.7 billion or 45% of UDRs real estate owned based upon
book value ($3.3 billion or 55% of UDRs real estate owned is unencumbered) consists of the
following as of June 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Communities |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
Encumbered |
|
Fixed Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
497,980 |
|
|
$ |
476,810 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
755,393 |
|
|
|
666,642 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate secured debt |
|
|
1,266,698 |
|
|
|
1,156,777 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
174,671 |
|
|
|
114,181 |
|
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Tax-exempt secured note payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
260,921 |
|
|
|
164,513 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate secured debt |
|
|
462,592 |
|
|
|
305,694 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured debt |
|
$ |
1,729,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,462,471 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR has secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate commitment
of $1.1 billion at June 30, 2009. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10
years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be
extended for an additional five years at our option. We have $755.4 million of the funded balance
fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining funded balance on these
facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of 1.8%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Borrowings outstanding |
|
$ |
1,016,314 |
|
|
$ |
831,155 |
|
Weighted average borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
954,738 |
|
|
|
702,620 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
1,016,916 |
|
|
|
831,370 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period |
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
The Company will from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt
instruments. In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair
value and amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life
of the underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair market adjustment was an asset of $913,000
and $763,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from August 2009 through June
2016 and carry interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 8.18%. Mortgage notes payable includes debt
associated with development activities. The Company has the ability under the debt instrument
maturing in October 2009 to exercise contractually provided extensions (two one-year extensions) on
the outstanding balance of $110.3 million ($105.0 million is at a fixed rate and the remaining $5.3
million is at a variable rate).
Tax-exempt secured notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt
housing bond issues mature in March 2031 and carry an interest rate of 5.30%. Interest on these
notes is payable in semi-annual installments.
15
Secured credit facilities. At June 30, 2009, UDRs fixed rate secured credit facilities
consisted of $755.4 million on a $1.1 billion aggregate commitment under four revolving secured
credit facilities with Fannie Mae (the Company also owes $260.9 million under the variable rate
component of these credit facilities). As of June 30, 2009, the fixed rate Fannie Mae credit
facilities had a weighted average fixed rate of interest of 5.43%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from October 2009 through April
2016. The mortgage notes payable are based on LIBOR plus some basis points, which translate into
interest rates ranging from 1.03% to 4.00% at June 30, 2009.
Tax-exempt secured note payable. The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures
tax-exempt housing bond issues matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly
installments. The variable mortgage note has an interest rate of 1.43% as of June 30, 2009.
Secured credit facilities. The variable rate secured credit facilities consisted of $260.9
million outstanding on the Fannie Mae credit facilities. As of June 30, 2009, the variable rate
Fannie Mae credit facilities had a weighted average floating rate of interest of 1.76%.
The aggregate maturities, including amortizing principal payments, of our secured debt due
during each of the next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Tax-Exempt |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Tax Exempt |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
116,690 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,257 |
|
|
$ |
5,335 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
123,282 |
|
2010 |
|
|
109,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,644 |
|
2011 |
|
|
83,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,808 |
|
|
|
36,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,513 |
|
|
|
212,151 |
|
2012 |
|
|
56,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,944 |
|
|
|
16,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
310,808 |
|
2013 |
|
|
61,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,631 |
|
|
|
38,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,506 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
70,359 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
482,099 |
|
|
|
77,708 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
161,408 |
|
|
|
831,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
497,980 |
|
|
$ |
13,325 |
|
|
$ |
755,393 |
|
|
$ |
174,671 |
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
260,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,729,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
6. UNSECURED DEBT
A summary of unsecured debt as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding under an unsecured term loan due February 2010
(a) |
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding under an unsecured credit
facility due July 2012 (b) |
|
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,100 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
6.50% Notes due June 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
3.90% Medium-Term Notes due March 2010 (includes premium of $112 and $190) |
|
|
50,112 |
|
|
|
50,190 |
|
3.625% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2011 (net of APB 14-1 discount of $4,286 and $7,080) (c), (d) |
|
|
122,049 |
|
|
|
164,255 |
|
5.00% Medium-Term Notes due January 2012 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
6.05% Medium-Term Notes due June 2013 (d) |
|
|
122,500 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
5.13% Medium-Term Notes due January 2014 |
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
5.50% Medium-Term Notes due April 2014 (net of discount
of $329 and $363) |
|
|
128,171 |
|
|
|
128,137 |
|
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2015
(includes premium of $194 and $212) |
|
|
175,369 |
|
|
|
175,387 |
|
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2016 |
|
|
83,260 |
|
|
|
83,260 |
|
8.50% Debentures due September 2024 (d) |
|
|
53,118 |
|
|
|
54,118 |
|
4.00%
Convertible Senior Notes due December 2035 (net of APB 14-1 discount of $2,915 and $5,834) (d), (e) |
|
|
164,835 |
|
|
|
244,166 |
|
Other |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183,559 |
|
|
|
1,558,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,484,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,798,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, UDR borrowed $240 million in the form of a
two-year unsecured term loan from a consortium of banks. UDR entered into one interest rate
swap agreement associated with the borrowings under the term loan with an aggregate notional
value of $200 million in which the Company pays a fixed rate of interest and receives a
variable rate of interest on the notional amount. The interest rate swap effectively changes
UDRs interest rate exposure on $200 million of these borrowings from a variable rate to a
weighted average fixed rate of approximately 3.61%. The remaining $40 million has a variable
interest rate, which was 1.17% at June 30, 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
Our unsecured credit facility provides us with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $600
million, which at our election we can increase to $750 million under certain circumstances.
Our unsecured credit facility with a consortium of financial institutions carries an interest
rate equal to LIBOR plus a spread of 47.5 basis points and matures on July 26, 2012. In
addition, the unsecured credit facility contains a
provision that allows us to bid up to 50% of the commitment and we can bid out the entire
unsecured credit facility once per quarter so long as we maintain an investment grade rating. |
|
(c) |
|
At any time on or after July 15, 2011, prior to the close of business on the second business
day prior to September 15, 2011, and also following the occurrence of certain events, the
notes will be convertible at the option of the holder. Upon conversion of the notes, UDR will
deliver cash and common stock, if any, based on a daily conversion value calculated on a
proportionate basis for each trading day of the relevant 30 trading day observation period.
The initial conversion rate for each $1,000 principal amount of notes is 26.6326 shares of our
common stock, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The Companys Special
Dividend met the criteria to adjust the conversion rate and will resulted in an adjusted
conversion rate of 29.0207 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 of principal. In
connection with the issuance of the 3.625% convertible senior notes, UDR entered into a capped
call transaction with respect to its common stock. The convertible note and capped call
transaction, both of which expire September 2011, must be net share settled. The maximum
number of shares to be issued under the convertible notes is 6.7 million shares, subject to
certain adjustment provisions. The capped call transaction combines a purchased call option
with a strike price of $37.548 with a written call option with a strike price of $43.806.
These transactions have no effect on the terms of the 3.625% convertible senior notes by
effectively increasing the initial conversion price to $43.806 per share, representing a 40%
conversion premium. The net cost of $12.6 million of the capped call transaction was included
in stockholders equity. |
17
|
|
|
(d) |
|
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company repurchased several
different traunches of its unsecured debt in open market purchases resulting in retired debt
with a notional value of $79.3 million and $238.9 million for $72.3 million and $222.3 million
of cash, respectively . The gains of $2.7 and $9.8 million are presented as a separate
component of interest expense on our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Consistent with our accounting policy, the
Company expensed $1.6 million and $2.3 million of unamortized financing costs and $1.6 million
and $3.4 million of unamortized premium on convertible debt as a result of these debt
retirements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
(e) |
|
The convertible notes are convertible at the option of the holder on January 15, 2011,
December 15, 2015, December 15, 2020, December 15, 2025 and December 15, 2030 into cash, and
in certain circumstances, shares of UDRs common stock at an initial conversion price of
approximately 35.2988 shares per $1,000 principal, subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. The Companys Special Dividend met the criteria to adjust the conversion rate
and the conversion rate was adjusted to 38.7123 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 of
principal. The Company has at our discretion after providing adequate notification, the
ability to redeem the instrument subsequent to January 15, 2011 for cash, and in certain
instances shares of UDRs common stock. |
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) affirmed the consensus of FASB
Staff Position APB 14-1 (FSP APB 14-1), Accounting for Convertible Debt instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which applies to all
convertible debt instruments that have a net settlement feature, which means that such
convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash
upon conversion. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled
wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity
components in a manner reflective of the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The Company
adopted FSP APB 14-1 as of January 1, 2009, and the adoption impacted the historical accounting for
the 3.625% convertible senior notes due September 2011 and the 4.00% convertible senior notes due
December 2035, and resulted in increased interest expense of $1.1 million and $2.3 million and
$1.7 million and $3.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The following is a summary of short-term bank borrowings under UDRs unsecured credit facility
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding at end of period |
|
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
102,092 |
|
|
|
84,566 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
279,400 |
|
|
|
587,400 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
18
The convertible notes are convertible at the option of the holder, and as such are
presented as if the holder will convert the debt instrument at the earliest available date. The
aggregate maturities of unsecured debt for the five years subsequent to June 30, 2009 are as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Total |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,014 |
|
|
|
290,014 |
|
2011 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
286,860 |
|
|
|
286,860 |
|
2012 |
|
|
61,100 |
|
|
|
99,976 |
|
|
|
161,076 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,476 |
|
|
|
122,476 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
624,233 |
|
|
|
624,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,423,559 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The convertible debt balances have been adjusted to reflect the effect of APB 14-1. Excluding the
adjustment, the total maturities in 2011 would be $294.1 million. |
Our debt instruments contain covenants that we were in compliance with at June 30, 2009.
7. (LOSS)/EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based upon
common shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive stock options and other potentially dilutive
common stock equivalents such as the non-vested restricted stock awards.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
periods presented (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Numerator for (loss)/earnings per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/earnings available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(14,858 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,287 |
) |
|
$ |
716,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for (loss)/earnings per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
150,393 |
|
|
|
139,309 |
|
|
|
149,738 |
|
|
|
141,470 |
|
Non-vested restricted stock awards |
|
|
(949 |
) |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted (loss)/earnings per share |
|
|
149,444 |
|
|
|
137,969 |
|
|
|
148,564 |
|
|
|
140,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/earnings per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
5.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of the conversion of the operating partnership units, Out-Performance
Partnership Shares, convertible preferred stock, and convertible debt is not dilutive and is
therefore not included in the above calculations as the Company reported a loss from continuing
operations.
If the operating partnership units were converted to common stock, the additional weighted
average common shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, would
be 6,513,951 and 7,276,521 and 9,622,236 and 9,663,090, respectively.
At June 30, 2009 and 2008, if the measurement periods had ended on that date, no Series E
Out-Performance Partnership Shares would have been issued had the Program terminated on that date.
Accordingly, no additional operating partnership units would have been issued at that date (see
Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, for a discussion of UDRs Out-Performance Programs).
19
If the convertible preferred stock were converted to common stock, the additional shares of common
stock outstanding would be 3,035,547 weighted average common shares for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
8. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, UDR adopted SFAS 157, which defines fair value based on the price
that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to
measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described
below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that
the entity has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical
or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated with observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity
and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes
certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use
significant unobservable inputs. |
The Companys derivative contracts are the only assets or liabilities that are measured
and recognized at fair value using the SFAS 157 hierarchy. The derivative contracts use the Level
2 hierarchy and are recorded in Other assets and in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for $3.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively as
of June 30, 2009.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, notes receivable, escrow 1031exchange funds, accounts receivable, prepaids, real
estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable, security deposits and prepaid rent, distributions
payable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short term nature of
these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments were determined by the
Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable
judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize
on the disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
20
The Company adopted the provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments on June 30, 2009, which require disclosures about the fair
value of financial instruments in interim as well as annual financial statements. The carrying
amounts and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments, where different, as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Debt instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt (a) |
|
$ |
1,729,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,732,771 |
|
|
$ |
1,462,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,419,411 |
|
Unsecured debt (b) |
|
|
1,484,659 |
|
|
|
1,314,650 |
|
|
|
1,798,662 |
|
|
|
1,183,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(8,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,027 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,011 |
) |
Interest rate caps |
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note 5, Secured Debt |
|
(b) |
|
See Note 6, Unsecured Debt |
|
(c) |
|
See Note 9, Derivatives and Hedging Activity |
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, which provides additional guidance designed to create greater
clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities. The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of the Companys investments at
June 30, 2009 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Value (Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Amount) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities- U.S. |
|
$ |
31,934 |
|
|
$ |
2,045 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the Company recognized an unrealized gain during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, and it does not intend to sell the investments at a loss nor will it be required to
sell the investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis by the time the Companys rights
to redeem the debt securities become effective in March 2012, the Company does not consider the
investment in these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2009. As such, the
Company did not recognize an other-than-temporary impairment on any of its debt securities during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
9. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic
risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount,
sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments.
Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that
arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain
cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates.
The Companys derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount,
timing, and duration of the Companys known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected
cash payments principally related to the Companys investments and borrowings.
21
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest
expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the
Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management
strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of
the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as
cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates
rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up front premium.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, such derivatives were used
to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a $1,000 (loss) on hedge
ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and index mismatches between the derivative
and the hedged item.
Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) related to derivatives
will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Companys
variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $8.1
million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that
were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
593,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
113,909 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the
Companys exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict
hedge accounting requirements of SFAS 133. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated
in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in gains of $720,000 and
$665,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had
the following outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging
relationships (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
Instruments |
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
270,166 |
|
22
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments as
well as their classification on the Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009.
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments (amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
2,344 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
8,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Income Statement
The tables below present the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on the
Income Statement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Loss |
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified from |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective |
|
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Derivatives in SFAS 133 |
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
|
Portion and Amount |
|
|
(Ineffective Portion and |
|
Cash Flow Hedging |
|
Derivative (Effective |
|
|
Income (Effective |
|
|
Income (Effective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Amount Excluded from |
|
Relationships |
|
Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
2,018 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(3,138 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(475 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(5,784 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Hedging Instruments Under |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Income on |
|
SFAS 133 |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other income / (expense) |
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other income / (expense) |
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision
where (1) if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of
the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in
default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the Company has agreements with some of its
derivative counterparties that contain a provision where the Company could be declared in default
on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the
lender due to the Companys default on the indebtedness.
The Company also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan
and financial covenant provisions of the Companys indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the
derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would result in the
Company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes
accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements
was $7.9 million. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these
agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at June 30, 2009, it would have
been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $7.9
million.
10. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was $5.1 million and $11.9 million at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. It consists of accumulated unrealized gains from the
mark-to-market of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale and unrealized gains or
losses from derivative financial instruments. The Company allocates a pro-rata share of gains or
losses to non-controlling interests.
11. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
UDR accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R, Share Based Payment,
which the Company adopted on January 1, 2006, utilizing the modified prospective method. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized $4.2 million and $3.5 million,
respectively as stock based compensation expense, which is inclusive of awards granted to our
outside directors.
24
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
Real Estate Under Development
UDR is committed to completing our unfunded real estate projects under development and our
development joint ventures. At June 30, 2009 our commitments are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Costs Incurred |
|
|
Expected Costs |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
to Date |
|
|
to Complete |
|
|
Stake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly owned under development |
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
249,458 |
|
|
$ |
110,042 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Unconsolidated joint venture (a) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
54,467 |
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
303,925 |
|
|
$ |
114,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Costs incurred to date and expected costs to complete are based on UDRs ownership
percentage of the joint venture. |
UDR has entered into a contract with a third party to purchase an apartment community of 289
homes in Dallas, Texas for approximately $29.0 million upon completion of its development, which
will be recorded at that time. The apartment community is expected to be completed in the third
quarter of 2009.
The Company may be required to make additional capital contributions to certain of our joint
ventures should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund development costs or
operating shortfalls.
Contingencies
Series E Out-Performance Program
In February 2007, the board of directors of UDR approved the Series E Out-Performance Program
(the Series E Program) pursuant to which certain executive officers of UDR (the Series E
Participants) were given the opportunity to invest indirectly in UDR by purchasing interests in
UDR Out-Performance V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Series E LLC), the only
asset of which is a special class of partnership units of the Operating Partnership (Series E
Out-Performance Partnership Shares or Series E OPPSs). The Series E Program is part of the New
Out-Performance Program approved by UDRs stockholders in May 2005. The Series E LLC has agreed to
sell 805,000 membership units to certain members of UDRs senior management at a price of $1.00 per
unit. The aggregate purchase price of $805,000 for the Series E OPPSs, assuming 100%
participation, is based upon the advice of an independent valuation expert. The Series E Program
will measure the cumulative total return on our common stock over the 36-month period beginning
January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2009.
The Series E Program is designed to provide participants with the possibility of substantial
returns on their investment if the cumulative total return on UDRs common stock, as measured by
the cumulative amount of dividends paid plus share price appreciation during the measurement period
is at least the equivalent of a 36% total return, or 12% annualized (Minimum Return).
25
At the conclusion of the measurement period, if UDRs cumulative total return satisfies these
criteria, the Series E LLC as holder of the Series E OPPSs will receive (for the indirect benefit
of the Series E Participants as holders of interests in the Series E LLC) distributions and
allocations of income and loss from the Operating Partnership equal to the distributions and
allocations that would be received on the number of OP Units obtained by:
|
i. |
|
determining the amount by which the cumulative total return of UDRs common
stock over the measurement period exceeds the Minimum Return (such excess being the
Excess Return); |
|
ii. |
|
multiplying 2% of the Excess Return by UDRs market capitalization (defined
as the average number of shares outstanding over the 36-month period, including common
stock, OP Units, common stock equivalents and OP Units); and |
|
iii. |
|
dividing the number obtained in (ii) by the market value of one share of
UDRs common stock on the valuation date, computed as the volume-weighted average
price per day of the common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the
valuation date. |
For the Series E OPPSs, the number determined pursuant to clause (ii) above is capped at 0.5%
of market capitalization.
If, on the valuation date, the cumulative total return of UDRs common stock does not meet the
Minimum Return, then the Series E Participants will forfeit their entire initial investment.
Based on the results through June 30, 2009, no Series E OPPSs would have been issued had the
Program terminated on that date. However, since the ultimate determination of Series E OPPSs to be
issued will not occur until December 31, 2009, and the number of Series E OPPSs is determinable
only upon future events, the financial statements do not reflect any impact for these events.
Accordingly, the contingently issuable Series E OPPSs will only be included in basic earnings per
share after the measurement period has ended and the applicable hurdle has been met. Furthermore,
the Series E OPPSs will only be included in common stock and common stock equivalents in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share after the hurdle has been met at the end of the reporting
period (if any), assuming the measurement period ended at the end of the reporting period.
Litigation and Legal Matters
UDR is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business. UDR cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal proceedings and
claims at this time. UDR believes that such liability, to the extent not provided for through
insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations or cash flow.
13. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, (SFAS
131), requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating
decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for purposes of assessing such segments
performance. UDRs chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its executive
management team who use several generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the
performance of the business for our reportable operating segments.
UDR owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the United States that
generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of apartment homes to a
diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures for UDRs apartment communities are rental
income and net operating income (NOI). Rental income represents gross market rent less
adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less
direct property operating expenses. UDRs chief operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key
measure of segment profit or loss.
26
UDRs two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other communities:
|
|
|
Same communities represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized
prior to April 1, 2008, and held as of June 30, 2009. A comparison of operating
results from the prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had
stabilized occupancy and operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year,
there is no plan to conduct substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is
not held for disposition within the current year. A community is considered to have
stabilized occupancy once it achieves 90% occupancy for at least three consecutive
months. |
|
|
|
Non-mature/other communities represent those communities that were acquired or
developed in 2007 and 2008, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties
classified as real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties,
joint venture properties, properties managed by third parties and the non-apartment
components of mixed use properties. |
Executive management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same
community and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is
consistent with the aggregation criteria of SFAS 131 as each of our apartment communities generally
have similar economic characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, UDRs
reportable segments have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is
provided to the chief operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants
contributed 10% or more of UDRs total revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to current year
presentation. These reclassifications primarily represent presentation changes related to
discontinued operations as described in Note 3, Discontinued Operations. The accounting
policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as those described in
Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the consolidated financial statements
included in UDRs Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 22, 2009. The following table details rental
income and NOI for UDRs reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, and reconciles NOI to net income per the Consolidated Statement of Operations (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Reportable apartment home segment rental income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
53,719 |
|
|
$ |
54,490 |
|
|
$ |
107,584 |
|
|
$ |
107,789 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
26,941 |
|
|
|
26,496 |
|
|
|
53,642 |
|
|
|
52,830 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
27,789 |
|
|
|
28,399 |
|
|
|
55,802 |
|
|
|
56,956 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
39,614 |
|
|
|
27,251 |
|
|
|
77,836 |
|
|
|
80,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental income |
|
$ |
151,843 |
|
|
$ |
140,541 |
|
|
$ |
302,458 |
|
|
$ |
306,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment NOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
38,191 |
|
|
$ |
38,374 |
|
|
$ |
76,653 |
|
|
$ |
75,557 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
18,787 |
|
|
|
18,411 |
|
|
|
37,041 |
|
|
|
36,315 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
17,168 |
|
|
|
18,044 |
|
|
|
34,674 |
|
|
|
35,907 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
2,584 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
24,736 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
47,006 |
|
|
|
49,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated NOI |
|
|
101,385 |
|
|
|
93,913 |
|
|
|
200,438 |
|
|
|
202,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
$ |
3,958 |
|
|
$ |
6,690 |
|
|
$ |
8,982 |
|
|
$ |
11,317 |
|
Property management |
|
|
(4,176 |
) |
|
|
(3,865 |
) |
|
|
(8,318 |
) |
|
|
(8,418 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
(2,036 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(69,067 |
) |
|
|
(62,507 |
) |
|
|
(138,052 |
) |
|
|
(114,942 |
) |
Interest, net |
|
|
(33,693 |
) |
|
|
(38,389 |
) |
|
|
(64,385 |
) |
|
|
(78,405 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(9,145 |
) |
|
|
(9,931 |
) |
|
|
(19,000 |
) |
|
|
(19,700 |
) |
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,478 |
) |
|
|
(944 |
) |
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
Tax (expense)/benefit for the TRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
4,914 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
(49,048 |
) |
Net gain on the sale of land and depreciable property |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
780,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
$ |
(12,058 |
) |
|
$ |
(677 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,687 |
) |
|
$ |
723,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table details the assets of UDRs reportable segments as of June 30, 2009
and as of December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Reportable apartment home segment assets: |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Same communities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
2,008,051 |
|
|
$ |
1,994,607 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
724,953 |
|
|
|
718,124 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
840,229 |
|
|
|
834,496 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
131,852 |
|
|
|
131,250 |
|
Non-mature communities/Other |
|
|
2,264,442 |
|
|
|
2,153,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
5,969,527 |
|
|
|
5,831,753 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,215,570 |
) |
|
|
(1,078,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets net book value |
|
|
4,753,957 |
|
|
|
4,753,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
12,740 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
8,795 |
|
|
|
7,726 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
26,561 |
|
|
|
29,168 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
207,450 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
63,475 |
|
|
|
47,048 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
71,848 |
|
|
|
85,842 |
|
Other assets real estate held for disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
4,970,898 |
|
|
$ |
5,143,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Capital expenditures excluding redevelopment for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
related to our same communities totaled $12.3 million and $17.7 million, respectively and $23.8
million and $31.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Capital
expenditures related to our non-mature/other communities for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 totaled $1.1 million and $711,000, respectively and $5.0 million and $7.3 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
|
i. |
|
Western Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, San Diego,
Seattle, Inland Empire, Sacramento and Portland. |
|
|
ii. |
|
Mid-Atlantic Metropolitan DC, Richmond, Baltimore, Norfolk, and Other Mid-Atlantic. |
|
|
iii. |
|
Southeastern Tampa, Orlando, Nashville, Jacksonville, and Other Florida. |
|
|
iv. |
|
Southwestern Phoenix and Dallas |
14. Subsequent Event
On
August 4, 2009, the Company announced a tender offer relating to its 8.50% Debentures due
September 15, 2024 (the Notes) and a solicitation of consents (the Consents) from the holders
of the Notes to amend the related indenture. The tender offer expires on August 31, 2009 (the
Expiration Time), unless extended or earlier terminated
and the consent solicitation expires on August 17, 2009 (Early Tender Deadline), unless extended or earlier terminated.
Holders who tender their Notes and deliver their Consents by the Early Tender Deadline shall
receive $1,010 per $1,000 principal amount of their Notes, (which includes an early tender payment
of $30), plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, to be paid promptly after the Early Tender
Deadline. Holders who tender their Notes and deliver their Consents after the Early Tender Deadline
but by the Expiration Time shall receive $980 per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes to be paid
promptly after the Expiration Time.
29
|
|
|
Item 2. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and
dispositions, development activity and capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent
growth, occupancy, and rental expense growth. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things,
unanticipated adverse business developments affecting us, or our properties, adverse changes in the
real estate markets and general and local economies and business conditions. Although we believe
that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any
of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements included in this report may
not prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking
statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a
representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such
statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
The following factors, among others, could cause our future results to differ materially from
those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
general economic factors; |
|
|
|
unfavorable changes in apartment market and economic conditions that could adversely
affect occupancy levels and rental rates; |
|
|
|
the failure of acquisitions to achieve anticipated results; |
|
|
|
possible difficulty in selling apartment communities; |
|
|
|
the timing and closing of planned dispositions under agreement; |
|
|
|
competitive factors that may limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase
or maintain rents; |
|
|
|
insufficient cash flow that could affect our debt financing and create refinancing
risk; |
|
|
|
failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could impair our debt service payments
and distributions to stockholders; |
|
|
|
development and construction risks that may impact our profitability; |
|
|
|
potential damage from natural disasters, including hurricanes and other
weather-related events, which could result in substantial costs to us; |
|
|
|
risks from extraordinary losses for which we may not have insurance or adequate
reserves; |
|
|
|
uninsured losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insurance retention, uninsured
claims or casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage; |
|
|
|
delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule; |
|
|
|
our failure to succeed in new markets; |
30
|
|
|
changing interest rates, which could increase interest costs and affect the market
price of our securities; |
|
|
|
potential liability for environmental contamination, which could result in
substantial costs to us; |
|
|
|
the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code in any taxable year; |
|
|
|
our internal control over financial reporting may not be considered effective which
could result in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports, and in turn have
an adverse effect on our stock price; and |
|
|
|
changes in real estate laws, tax laws and other laws affecting our business. |
A discussion of these and other factors affecting our business and prospects is set forth
below in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors. We encourage investors to review these risks factors.
Business Overview
We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, and
manages apartment communities nationwide. We were formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation. In June
2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland. Our subsidiaries include two
operating partnerships, Heritage Communities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and United
Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Unless the context otherwise requires, all
references in this report to we, us, our, the company, or UDR refer collectively to UDR,
Inc. and its subsidiaries.
31
At June 30, 2009, our portfolio included 162 communities with 44,701 apartment homes
nationwide. The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
Same Communities |
|
Communities |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (b) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (b) |
|
|
Western Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Co, CA |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
$ |
710,536 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,550 |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
276,970 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1,873 |
|
Los Angeles, CA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
263,090 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
% |
|
|
1,505 |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
172,751 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
|
1,396 |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
150,393 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
% |
|
|
1,191 |
|
Monterey Peninsula, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
150,348 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
|
1,091 |
|
Inland Empire, CA |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
149,334 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
1,264 |
|
Portland, OR |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
67,504 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
994 |
|
Sacramento, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
67,125 |
|
|
|
93.2 |
% |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
92.5 |
% |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan DC |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
257,943 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
% |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
1,430 |
|
Richmond, VA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
155,180 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
|
1,011 |
|
Baltimore, MD |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
153,722 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
1,177 |
|
Norfolk VA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
82,202 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
% |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
|
963 |
|
Other Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
75,905 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
% |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
248,878 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
933 |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
186,398 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
930 |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
153,780 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
% |
|
|
842 |
|
Nashville, TN |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
140,686 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
|
876 |
|
Other Florida |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
110,487 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
70,225 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
94.6 |
% |
|
|
910 |
|
Dallas, TX |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
61,628 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
% |
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average Same Communities |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
33,545 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
3,705,085 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Matures, Commercial Properties &
Other |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
10,865 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
2,014,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Held for Investment |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
44,410 |
|
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
5,720,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Under Development (c) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
249,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
44,701 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,969,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The same community population for the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes 33,166 homes. |
|
(b) |
|
Total Income per Occupied Home represents total revenues per weighted average number of
apartment homes occupied. |
|
(c) |
|
The Company is currently developing six wholly-owned communities with a total of 2,207
apartment homes of which 1,916 have not yet been completed. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through
operating cash flows, the sale or maturity of existing assets, or by the acquisition of additional
funds through capital management. Both the coordination of asset and liability maturities and
effective capital management are important to the maintenance of liquidity. Our primary source of
liquidity is our cash flow from operations as determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and
operating expenses related to our portfolio of apartment homes and borrowings under credit
agreements. We routinely use our unsecured credit facility to temporarily fund certain investing
and financing activities prior to arranging for longer-term financing or the issuance of equity or
debt securities. During the past several years, proceeds from the sale of real estate have been
used for both investing and financing activities as we repositioned our portfolio.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations and borrowings under credit agreements. We expect to meet certain long-term liquidity
requirements such as scheduled debt maturities, the repayment of financing on development
activities, and potential property acquisitions, through secured and unsecured borrowings, the
disposition of properties, and the issuance of debt or equity securities. We believe that our net
cash provided by operations and borrowings under credit agreements will continue to be adequate to
meet both operating requirements and the payment of dividends by the Company in accordance with
REIT requirements. Likewise, the budgeted
expenditures for improvements and renovations of certain properties are expected to be funded
from property operations and borrowings under credit agreements.
32
We have a shelf registration statement filed with the SEC which provides for the issuance of
an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock, guarantees of debt securities, warrants,
subscription rights, purchase contracts and units to facilitate future financing activities in the
public capital markets. Access to capital markets is dependent on market conditions at the time of
issuance.
Future Capital Needs
Future development expenditures are expected to be funded with proceeds from construction
loans, through joint ventures, unsecured or secured credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of
equity or debt securities, the sale of properties and to a lesser extent, with cash flows provided
by operating activities. Acquisition activity in strategic markets is expected to be largely
financed by the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of properties, through the issuance of
equity and debt securities, the issuance of operating partnership units, and the assumption or
placement of secured and/or unsecured debt.
During the remainder of 2009, we have approximately $123.3 million of secured debt maturing
and we anticipate repaying that debt with proceeds from borrowings under our secured or unsecured
credit facilities, and by exercising extension rights, as applicable, with respect to such debt.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies are those having the most impact on the reporting of our
financial condition and results and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. These
policies include those related to (1) capital expenditures, (2) impairment of long-lived assets,
and (3) real estate investment properties. Based on the Companys repositioning initiative,
management deemed our policy surrounding real estate sales to be a critical accounting policy.
Real Estate Sales
The Company accounts for sales of real estate in accordance with SFAS 66. For sale
transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as the Company no
longer having continuing involvement in the property we remove the related assets and liabilities
from our consolidated balance sheet and record the gain or loss in the period the transaction
closes. For sales transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to our
continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for the
transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales to entities in which we retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted for as partial
sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual method have been
satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize profit
proportionate to the outside interest in the buyer and will defer the gain on the interest we
retain. The Company will recognize any deferred gain when the property is then sold to a third
party. In transactions accounted by us as partial sales, we determine if the buyer of the majority
equity interest in the venture was provided a preference as to cash flows in either an operating or
a capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been provided, we recognize profit only to the
extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity interest exceed costs related to the
entire property.
Our other critical accounting policies are described in more detail in the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no significant
changes in our critical accounting policies from those reported in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on May 22, 2009. With respect to these critical accounting policies, we believe that the
application of judgments and assessments is consistently applied and produces financial information
that fairly depicts the results of operations for all periods presented.
33
Statements of Cash Flows
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating and investing
activities and net cash used in financing activities that are presented in our Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows.
Operating Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, our cash flow provided by operating activities was
$124.0 million compared to $82.8 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in cash
flow from operating activities is primarily due to changes in our receivables and accrued
liabilities.
Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net cash provided by investing activities was $10.1
million as compared to $500.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. Changes in the level of
investing activities from period to period reflects our strategy as it relates to our disposition,
acquisition, capital expenditures, and development programs, as well as the impact of the capital
market environment on these activities, all of which are discussed in further detail below.
Acquisitions
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we did not acquire any real estate. Our long-term
strategic plan is to achieve greater operating efficiencies by investing in fewer, more
concentrated markets. As a result, we have been expanding our interests in the Southern California,
Northern California, Florida, Metropolitan Washington DC and the Washington State markets over the
past several years. Prospectively, any additional acquisitions will be channeled into those
markets that we believe will provide the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted based
upon defined criteria including high barriers to entry, favorable job formation and low
single-family home affordability.
Capital Expenditures
In conformity with GAAP, we capitalize those expenditures related to acquiring new assets,
materially enhancing the value of an existing asset, or substantially extending the useful life of
an existing asset. Expenditures necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating
condition are expensed as incurred.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, $40.2 million or approximately $924 per home was
spent on capital expenditures for all of our communities, excluding development, condominium
conversions and commercial properties. These capital improvements included turnover related
expenditures for floor coverings and appliances, other recurring capital expenditures such as
roofs, siding, parking lots, and asset preservation capital expenditures, which aggregated $14.4
million or $332 per home. In addition, revenue enhancing capital expenditures, kitchen and bath
upgrades, and other extensive exterior/interior upgrades totaled $13.4 million or $309 per home,
and major renovations totaled $12.3 million or $283 per home for the six months ended June 30,
2009.
34
The following table outlines capital expenditures and repair and maintenance costs for all of
our communities, excluding real estate under development, condominium conversions and commercial
properties, for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(per home) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Turnover capital expenditures |
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
$ |
4,548 |
|
|
|
-0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
-4.6 |
% |
Asset preservation expenditures |
|
|
9,924 |
|
|
|
8,886 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
14,434 |
|
|
|
13,434 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue enhancing improvements |
|
|
13,406 |
|
|
|
23,482 |
|
|
|
-42.9 |
% |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
-45.3 |
% |
Major renovations |
|
|
12,310 |
|
|
|
32,692 |
|
|
|
-62.3 |
% |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
-64.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
40,150 |
|
|
$ |
69,608 |
|
|
|
-42.3 |
% |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
|
-44.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair and maintenance expense |
|
$ |
14,622 |
|
|
|
16,700 |
|
|
|
-12.4 |
% |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
|
-16.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stabilized home count |
|
|
43,452 |
|
|
|
41,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures for our communities decreased $29.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to the comparable period in 2008. This decrease was primarily
attributable to the Companys ongoing repositioning of our real estate portfolio evidenced by our
disposition of 85 communities during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Recurring capital
expenditures during 2009 are currently expected to be approximately $675 per home.
Development
At June 30, 2009, our development pipeline for wholly-owned communities totaled 2,207 homes
with a budget of $359.5 million in which we have a carrying value of $249.5 million. We expect to
have the first of these communities complete development during the third quarter of 2009. In
addition, we own several parcels of land held for future development with a gross book value of
$145.0 million in which the Company is seeking entitlements and preparing for development, although
we do not anticipate commencing any new developments during 2009.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we invested approximately $97.8 million in development
projects, an increase of $39.2 million from our 2008 level of $58.6 million. We funded these costs
with $40.0 million in draws on our construction facilities. At June 30, 2009, the Company has
drawn $204.3 million and has $114.6 million of remaining capacity on our construction facilities.
We completed development on one wholly-owned community with 200 apartment homes at a total cost of
$16.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Unconsolidated Development Joint Ventures
UDR is a partner with an unaffilitated third party in a joint venture which is developing a
274 home apartment community in the central business district of Bellevue, Washington. Construction
began in the fourth quarter of 2006 and is scheduled for completion in the third quarter of 2009.
At closing and at June 30, 2009, we owned 49% of the joint venture. Our initial investment was
$10.0 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2009,
the Company made additional capital contributions of $16.1 million to the joint venture to fund development costs. Our investment at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 was $28.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture which owns a site in
Bellevue, Washington. At closing and at June 30, 2009, we owned 49% of the joint venture. Our
initial investment was $5.7 million. Our investment at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
$10.0 million and $10.2 million, respectively. The Company initially planned to develop a 430 home
high rise apartment building with ground floor retail on an existing operating retail center.
However, during the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company decided to operate the retail
property as opposed to developing the site.
35
Disposition of Investments
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 UDR did not dispose of any communities. We plan to
continue to pursue our strategy of exiting markets where long-term growth prospects are limited and
redeploying capital into markets we believe will provide the best investment returns.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, UDR received full payment of
a $200.0 million note
issued in conjunction with the sale of 85 communities during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009, was $141.8
million versus $584.8 million for the comparable period in 2008.
The following is a summary of our significant financing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
Repaid $22.8 million of secured debt and $380.8 million of unsecured debt (represents
the notional amount of debt repaid and excludes the gain on extinguishment). The $380.8
million of unsecured debt includes $141.9 million for maturing medium-term notes and
$238.9 million for the repurchase of unsecured debt. |
|
|
|
Repurchased unsecured debt with a notional amount of $238.9 million for $222.3 million
resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $9.8 million, net of deferred finance charges.
The unsecured debt repurchased by the Company matured in 2009, 2011, 2013, 2024 and 2035.
As a result of these repurchases, the gain is represented as a reduction to interest
expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. |
|
|
|
We repurchased 100,000 shares of UDR common stock at an average price per share of
$7.98 under our share repurchase programs. |
|
|
|
Borrowed an additional $289.6 million of secured debt, which consisted of $186.4
million on our Fannie Mae credit facility, $63.2 million additional secured variable rate
debt and $40.0 million additional construction loans. |
Credit Facilities
As of June 30, 2009, we have secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an
aggregate commitment of $1.1 billion with $1.0 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit
facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and
certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at our option. We
have $755.4 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the
remaining funded balance on these facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of
1.8%.
We have a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures on July 26, 2012.
Under certain circumstances, we may increase the $600 million credit facility to $750 million.
Based on our current credit rating, the $600 million credit facility carries an interest rate equal
to LIBOR plus a spread of 47.5 basis points. Under a competitive bid feature and for so long as we
maintain an investment grade rating, we have the right under the $600 million credit facility to
bid out 50% of the commitment amount and we can bid out 100% of the commitment amount once per
quarter. As of June 30, 2009, we had $61.1 million of borrowings outstanding under the credit
facility leaving $538.9 million of unused capacity.
The Fannie Mae credit facilities and the unsecured revolving credit facility are subject to
customary financial covenants and limitations.
36
Derivative Instruments
As part of UDRs overall interest rate risk management strategy, we use derivatives as a means
to fix the interest rates of variable rate debt obligations or to hedge anticipated financing
transactions. UDRs derivative transactions used for interest rate risk management includes
interest rate swaps with indexes that relate to the pricing of specific financial instruments of
UDR. We believe that we have appropriately controlled our interest rate risk through the use of
derivative instruments so that there will not be any material unintended effect on consolidated
earnings. Derivative contracts did not have a material impact on the results of operations during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 (see Note 9
Derivatives and Hedging Activity).
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations, or FFO, is defined as net income (computed in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property,
plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. We compute FFO for all periods presented in accordance with the
recommendations set forth by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT)
April 1, 2002 White Paper. We consider FFO in evaluating property acquisitions and our operating
performance, and believe that FFO should be considered along with, but not as an alternative to,
net income and cash flow as a measure of our activities in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and is not necessarily indicative of cash
available to fund cash needs.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with
market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of
operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient
by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of REIT operating performance and
defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus
depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures. The use of FFO, combined with the required presentations, has been fundamentally
beneficial, improving the understanding of operating results of REITs among the investing public
and making comparisons of REIT operating results more meaningful. We generally consider FFO to be a
useful measure for reviewing our comparative operating and financial performance (although FFO
should be reviewed in conjunction with net income which remains the primary measure of performance)
because by excluding gains or (losses) related to sales of previously depreciated operating real
estate assets and excluding real estate asset depreciation and amortization, FFO can help one
compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to
different companies. We believe that FFO is the best measure of economic profitability for real
estate investment trusts.
37
The following table outlines our FFO calculation and reconciliation to generally accepted
accounting principles for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars and shares
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net (loss)/income attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
$ |
(12,058 |
) |
|
$ |
(677 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,687 |
) |
|
$ |
723,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
(3,209 |
) |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
|
(6,418 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including discontinued
operations |
|
|
69,067 |
|
|
|
62,507 |
|
|
|
138,052 |
|
|
|
114,942 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
|
|
49,048 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization on unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
2,062 |
|
Net gains on the sale of depreciable property in discontinued operations,
excluding RE3 |
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
(13,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
(780,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) basic |
|
$ |
52,719 |
|
|
$ |
47,223 |
|
|
$ |
106,792 |
|
|
$ |
101,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to preferred stockholders Series E (Convertible) |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations diluted |
|
$ |
53,650 |
|
|
$ |
48,154 |
|
|
$ |
108,654 |
|
|
$ |
103,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of convertible debt premium due to adoption of APB 14-1 |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of convertible debt premium due to adoption of APB 14-1 |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations as adjusted diluted |
|
$ |
56,314 |
|
|
$ |
49,824 |
|
|
$ |
114,368 |
|
|
$ |
106,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO as adjusted per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and OP Units outstanding basic |
|
|
155,958 |
|
|
|
147,591 |
|
|
|
155,841 |
|
|
|
149,921 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares, OP Units, and common stock
equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
159,039 |
|
|
|
151,412 |
|
|
|
158,896 |
|
|
|
153,680 |
|
In the computation of diluted FFO, when OP Units, out-performance partnership units,
convertible debt, unvested restricted stock, stock options, and the shares of Series E Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock are dilutive; they are included in the diluted share count.
RE3 is our subsidiary that focuses on development, land entitlement and short-term
hold investments. RE3 tax benefits and gain on sales, net of taxes, is defined as net
sales proceeds less a tax provision and the gross investment basis of the asset before accumulated
depreciation. We consider FFO with RE3 tax benefits and gain on sales, net of taxes, to
be a meaningful supplemental measure of performance because the short-term use of funds produce a
profit that differs from the traditional long-term investment in real estate for REITs.
38
The following table is our reconciliation of FFO share information to weighted average common
shares outstanding, basic and diluted, reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and OP units
outstanding basic |
|
|
155,958 |
|
|
|
147,591 |
|
|
|
155,841 |
|
|
|
149,921 |
|
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding |
|
|
(6,514 |
) |
|
|
(9,622 |
) |
|
|
(7,277 |
) |
|
|
(9,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -
basic per the Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
149,444 |
|
|
|
137,969 |
|
|
|
148,564 |
|
|
|
140,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, OP units, and
common stock equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
159,039 |
|
|
|
151,412 |
|
|
|
158,896 |
|
|
|
153,680 |
|
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding |
|
|
(6,514 |
) |
|
|
(9,622 |
) |
|
|
(7,277 |
) |
|
|
(9,664 |
) |
Weighted
average incremental shares from assumed conversion of stock options |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(592 |
) |
Weighted average incremental shares from unvested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
Weighted average number of Series E preferred shares outstanding |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding diluted
per the Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
149,444 |
|
|
|
137,969 |
|
|
|
148,564 |
|
|
|
140,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and therefore should not be considered an alternative to
net cash flows from operating activities, as determined by generally accepted accounting
principles, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally, it is not necessarily indicative of cash
availability to fund cash needs.
A presentation of cash flow metrics based on generally accepted accounting principles is as
follows for the six months ended June 30, (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
123,994 |
|
|
$ |
82,750 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
$ |
10,090 |
|
|
$ |
500,273 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(141,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(584,830 |
) |
Results of Operations
Net (Loss)/Income Available to Common Stockholders
Net loss available to common stockholders was ($14.9) million (($0.10) per diluted share) for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 versus ($3.9) million (($0.03) per diluted share) for the
comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2009, when
compared to the same period in 2008, resulted primarily from the following items, which are
discussed in further detail elsewhere within this report:
|
|
|
a reduction in the Companys disposition activities and the associated gains during the
three months ended June 30, 2009 relative to the prior year. The Company recognized net
gains of $2.1 million and $13.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Company does not believe it will have significant disposition
activity during the remainder of 2009, and |
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Companys acquisition of
operating properties and the completion of redevelopment and development communities in
2008 and 2009. |
39
These reductions were partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in corporate debt and the Company
recording a larger gain on extinguishment of debt on the repurchase of a portion of our
outstanding senior unsecured notes, which is presented as a reduction to interest expense,
and |
|
|
|
an increase in net operating income. |
Net loss available to common stockholders was ($30.3) million (($0.20) per diluted share) for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to net income of $716.6 million ($5.11 per diluted
share) for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease for the six months ended June 30,
2009, when compared to the same period in 2008, resulted primarily from the following items, all of
which are discussed in further detail elsewhere within this report:
|
|
|
a significant decrease in gains recognized from the sale of depreciable property, and |
|
|
|
an increase in real estate depreciation and amortization expense. |
These are partially offset by the following:
|
|
|
a decrease in interest expense due to a reduction in corporate debt and the Company
recording a larger gain on extinguishment of debt on the repurchase of a portion of our
outstanding senior unsecured notes and convertible debt, which is presented as a reduction
to interest expense, and |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in income attributed to non-controlling interest. |
Apartment Community Operations
The following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio for
each of the periods presented (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008% |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
%Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property rental income |
|
$ |
150,740 |
|
|
$ |
140,608 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
$ |
300,488 |
|
|
$ |
306,318 |
|
|
|
-1.9 |
% |
Property operating expense (a) |
|
|
(50,140 |
) |
|
|
(47,451 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
(100,755 |
) |
|
|
(107,450 |
) |
|
|
-6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income |
|
$ |
100,600 |
|
|
$ |
93,157 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
199,733 |
|
|
$ |
198,868 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes depreciation, amortization and property management expenses. |
40
The following table is our reconciliation of property net operating income to net income as
reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods presented (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income |
|
$ |
100,600 |
|
|
$ |
93,157 |
|
|
$ |
199,733 |
|
|
$ |
198,868 |
|
Other net operating income |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
3,359 |
|
Non-property income, net |
|
|
3,958 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
8,982 |
|
|
|
11,317 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(69,067 |
) |
|
|
(62,507 |
) |
|
|
(138,052 |
) |
|
|
(114,942 |
) |
Interest, net |
|
|
(33,693 |
) |
|
|
(38,389 |
) |
|
|
(64,385 |
) |
|
|
(78,405 |
) |
General and administrative and property management |
|
|
(13,321 |
) |
|
|
(13,796 |
) |
|
|
(27,318 |
) |
|
|
(28,118 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
(2,036 |
) |
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,478 |
) |
|
|
(944 |
) |
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
Tax (expense)/benefit for the TRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
4,914 |
|
Net gain on sale of land and depreciable property |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
780,395 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
(49,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income per the Consolidated Statement of Operations |
|
$ |
(12,058 |
) |
|
$ |
(677 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,687 |
) |
|
$ |
723,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities
Our same communities (those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to April 1,
2008, and held on June 30, 2009, which consisted of 33,545 apartment homes) provided 75.7% of our
property net operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
For the second quarter of 2009, same community properties net operating income decreased 1.0%
or $764,000 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in property net operating income
(NOI) was primarily attributable to a 0.9% or $1.1 million decrease in property rental income.
This decrease in property rental income was primarily driven by a 1.9% decrease in total income per
occupied home from $1,187 in 2008 to $1,165 in 2009 and a 76% or $313,000 increase in bad debt.
This was partially offset by a 9.7% or $411,000 increase in reimbursement income. Physical
occupancy increased from 94.8% to 95.7% during the same period.
Property operating expenses decreased by 0.8% or $297,000 during the second quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in property operating expenses was primarily
driven by an 8.7% or $225,000 decrease in administrative and marketing expense, a $115,000 or 2.2%
decrease in utilities, and a $137,000 or 2.3% decrease in repairs and maintenance expense. These
decreases were partially offset by a 10.9% or $198,000 increase in insurance expense.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
was 68.3% for both comparable periods.
Our same communities (those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January
1, 2008, and held on June 30, 2009, which consisted of 33,166 apartment homes) provided 75.7% of
our property net operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The decrease in rental revenues was primarily due to a 0.8% decrease in total income per
occupied home from $1,177 in 2008 to $1,167 in 2009, and an increase of 77.1% or $612,000 in bad
debt expense. This decrease was partially offset by a 5.4%, or $867,000, increase in fee income and
other reimbursements. Physical occupancy also increased slightly from 94.7% to 95.2%.
The increase in property NOI is primarily attributable to a $1.3 million, or 1.8%, decrease in
expenses partially offset by a $602,000, or 0.3%, decrease in property rental income. The decrease
in expense was primarily due to a 5.8% or $674,000 decrease in repairs and maintenance expense, a
2.9% or $518,000 decrease in personnel costs, and an 11.8% or $589,000 decrease in administrative
and marketing expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a 1.9% or $403,000 increase in
real estate taxes.
41
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
increased to 68.4% versus 67.9% in the comparable period in the prior year.
Non-Mature Communities
The remaining 24% or $24.0 million and 24% or $48.5 million of our property NOI during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, was generated from communities that we classify as
non-mature communities. UDRs non-mature communities consist primarily of sold properties,
properties classified as real estate held for disposition, communities acquired or developed in
2008 and 2009, redevelopment properties, and condominium properties. The largest components of
our non-mature portfolio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are our acquired and
redevelopment communities.
The acquired communities contributed NOI of $13.2 million and $25.8 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The redevelopment communities contributed NOI of $6.4
million and $12.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Other Income
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, significant amounts reflected in other
income include: interest income from a note for $200.0 million that the Company received related to
the disposition of 86 properties during 2008, interest income and discount amortization from an
interest in a convertible debt security, and fees earned for both recurring and non-recurring items
related to the Companys joint ventures. In May 2009, the
$200.0 million note was paid in full.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, real estate depreciation and amortization on
both continuing and discontinued operations increased 10.5% or $6.6 million and 20.1% or $23.1
million, respectively versus the comparable period in 2008, primarily due to acquisitions during
2008 and capital expenditures. As part of the Companys acquisition activity a portion of the
purchase price is allocated to intangible assets and are typically amortized over a period of less
than one year.
Interest Expense
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, interest expense on both continuing and
discontinued operations decreased 12.2% or $4.7 million and 17.9% or $14.0 million, respectively,
as compared to the comparable period in 2008. The decreases are primarily due to increased gains
recognized on debt extinguishment upon the redemption of unsecured notes and convertible debt and
the reduction of the weighted average interest rate from 5.0% in 2008 to 4.5% in 2009. The
decrease in the weighted average interest rate in 2009 reflects short-term bank borrowings and
variable rate debt that had lower interest rates in 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008.
General and Administrative
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, general and administrative expenses decreased
$786,000 or 7.9% versus the comparable period in 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009,
general and administrative expenses increased $700,000 or 3.6% versus the comparable period in
2008. The variances were due to a number of factors, none of which were significant.
42
Gains on the Sales of Depreciable Property
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized after-tax gains for financial
reporting purposes of $2.1 million versus $13.1 million for the comparable period in 2008. For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized after-tax gains for financial reporting purposes of
$1.9 million versus $780.2 million for the comparable period in 2008. Changes in the level of gains
recognized from period to period reflect the changing level of our divestiture activity from period
to period, as well as the extent of gains related to specific properties sold.
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While
the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results through wage pressures, utilities and
material costs, substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less, which generally
enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by increasing rents on our apartment homes.
Although an extreme escalation in energy and food costs could have a negative impact on our
residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we do not believe this has had a material
impact on our results for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
UDR has entered into a contract to purchase an apartment community of 289 homes in Dallas,
Texas for approximately $29.0 million upon completion of the development. The apartment community
is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2009.
Other than the purchase contract listed above, we do not have any other off-balance sheet
arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to interest rate changes associated with our unsecured credit facility and
other variable rate debt as well as refinancing risk on our fixed rate debt. UDRs involvement
with derivative financial instruments is limited and we do not expect to use them for trading or
other speculative purposes. UDR uses derivative instruments solely to manage its exposure to
interest rates.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a more complete discussion of our
interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. As of June 30, 2009, our market risk has not
changed materially from the amounts reported on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
43
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of June 30, 2009, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in
our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Based on this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in
our periodic SEC reports. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
concluded that during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, there has been no change in our internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over
financial reporting is designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how
remote. However, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective under circumstances where our disclosure controls
and procedures should reasonably be expected to operate effectively.
44
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material averse effect on our business, financial position or results
of operations.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are many factors that affect our business and our results of operations, some of which
are beyond our control. The following is a description of important factors that may cause our
actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected
or discussed in forward-looking statements set forth in this report relating to our financial
results, operations and business prospects. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation
to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on
which it is made.
Risks Related to Our Real Estate Investments and Our Operations
Unfavorable Apartment Market and Economic Conditions Could Adversely Affect Occupancy Levels,
Rental Revenues and the Value of Our Real Estate Assets. Unfavorable market conditions in the
areas in which we operate and unfavorable economic conditions generally may significantly affect
our occupancy levels, our rental rates and collections, the value of the properties and our ability
to strategically acquire or dispose of apartment communities on economically favorable terms.
Some of our major expenses, including mortgage payments and real estate taxes, generally do not
decline when related rents decline. We would expect that declines in our occupancy levels, rental
revenues and/or the values of our apartment communities would cause us to have less cash available
to pay our indebtedness and to distribute to our stockholders, which could adversely affect our
financial condition and the market value of our securities. Factors that may affect our occupancy
levels, our rental revenues, and/or the value of our properties include the following, among
others:
|
|
|
downturns in the national, regional and local economic conditions, particularly increases
in unemployment; |
|
|
|
declines in mortgage interest rates, making alternative housing more affordable; |
|
|
|
government or builder incentives which enable first time homebuyers to put little or no
money down, making alternative housing options more attractive; |
|
|
|
local real estate market conditions, including oversupply of, or reduced demand for,
apartment homes; |
|
|
|
declines in the financial condition of our tenants, which may make it more difficult for
us to collect rents from some tenants; |
|
|
|
changes in market rental rates; |
|
|
|
the timing and costs associated with property improvements, repairs or renovations; |
|
|
|
declines in household formation; and |
|
|
|
rent control or stabilization laws, or other laws regulating rental housing, which could
prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs. |
45
We Are Subject to Certain Risks Associated with Selling Apartment Communities, Which Could
Limit Our Operational and Financial Flexibility. We have periodically disposed of apartment
communities that no longer meet our strategic objectives, but adverse market conditions may make it
difficult to sell apartment communities like the ones we own, and purchasers may not be willing to
pay prices acceptable to us. These conditions may limit our ability to dispose of properties and
to change our portfolio promptly in order to meet our strategic objectives, which may in turn have
a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and the market value of our securities. We
are also subject to the following risks in connection with sales of our apartment communities:
|
|
|
a significant portion of the proceeds from our overall property sales may be held by
intermediaries in order for some sales to qualify as like-kind exchanges under Section 1031
of the Internal Revenue Code, so that any related capital gain can be deferred for federal
income tax purposes. As a result, we may not have immediate access to all of the cash flow
generated from our property sales; |
|
|
|
federal tax laws limit our ability to profit on the sale of communities that we have
owned for less than two years, and this limitation may prevent us from selling communities
when market conditions are favorable; further |
We May Not Have Access to Proceeds Obtained From the Sale of Apartment Communities. A
significant portion of the proceeds from our overall property sales may be held by intermediaries
in order for some sales to qualify as like-kind exchanges under Section 1031 of the Code, so that
any related capital gain can be deferred for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we may not
have immediate access to all of the cash flow generated from our property sales. In addition,
federal tax laws limit our ability to profit on the sale of communities that we have owned for
fewer than four years, and this limitation may prevent us from selling communities when market
conditions are favorable.
Competition Could Limit Our Ability to Lease Apartment Homes or Increase or Maintain Rents.
Our apartment communities compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents,
including other apartment communities, condominiums and single-family rental homes, as well as
owner occupied single- and multi-family homes. Competitive housing in a particular area could
adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and increase or maintain rents.
We May Not Realize the Anticipated Benefits of Past or Future Acquisitions, and the Failure to
Integrate Acquired Communities and New Personnel Successfully Could Create Inefficiencies. We
have selectively acquired in the past, and if presented with attractive opportunities we intend to
selectively acquire in the future, apartment communities that meet our investment criteria. Our
acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms or at all; |
|
|
|
even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for an apartment community, we may be
unable to complete the acquisition after incurring certain acquisition-related costs; |
|
|
|
an acquired apartment community may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our
investment, or a significant exposure related to the acquired property may go undetected
during our due diligence procedures; |
|
|
|
when we acquire an apartment community, we may invest additional amounts in it with the
intention of increasing profitability, and these additional investments may not produce the
anticipated improvements in profitability; and |
|
|
|
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate acquired apartment communities and
new personnel into our existing operations, and the failure to successfully integrate such
apartment communities or personnel will result in inefficiencies that could adversely affect
our expected return on our investments and our overall profitability. |
46
We do not expect to acquire apartment communities at the rate we have in prior years, which
may limit our growth and have a material adverse effect on our business and the market value of our
securities. In the past, other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension and
investment funds, developer partnerships, investment companies and other apartment REITs, have
competed with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new properties, and such competition
in the future may make it more difficult for us to pursue attractive investment opportunities on
favorable terms, which could adversely affect growth.
Development and Construction Risks Could Impact Our Profitability. In the past we have
selectively pursued the development and construction of apartment communities, and we intend to do
so in the future as appropriate opportunities arise. Development activities have been, and in the
future may be, conducted through wholly owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with
unaffiliated parties. Our development and construction activities are subject to the following
risks:
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain construction financing for development activities under
favorable terms, including but not limited to interest rates, maturity dates and/or loan to
value ratios, or at all which could cause us to delay or even abandon potential
developments; |
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain, or face delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use,
building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations, which could
result in increased development costs, could delay initial occupancy dates for all or a
portion of a development community, and could require us to abandon our activities entirely
with respect to a project for which we are unable to obtain permits or authorizations; |
|
|
|
if we are unable to find joint venture partners to help fund the development of a
community or otherwise obtain acceptable financing for the developments, our development
capacity may be limited; |
|
|
|
we may abandon development opportunities that we have already begun to explore, and we
may fail to recover expenses already incurred in connection with exploring such
opportunities; |
|
|
|
we may be unable to complete construction and lease-up of a community on schedule, or
incur development or construction costs that exceed our original estimates, and we may be
unable to charge rents that would compensate for any increase in such costs; |
|
|
|
occupancy rates and rents at a newly developed community may fluctuate depending on a
number of factors, including market and economic conditions, preventing us from meeting our
profitability goals for that community; and |
|
|
|
when we sell to third parties communities or properties that we developed or renovated,
we may be subject to warranty or construction defect claims that are uninsured or exceed the
limits of our insurance. |
In some cases in the past, the costs of upgrading acquired communities exceeded our original
estimates. We may experience similar cost increases in the future. Our inability to charge rents
that will be sufficient to offset the effects of any increases in these costs may impair our
profitability.
Some Potential Losses May Not Be Adequately Covered by Insurance. We have a comprehensive
insurance program covering our property and operating activities. We believe the policy
specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate. There are,
however, certain types of extraordinary losses which may not be adequately covered under our
insurance program. In addition, we will sustain losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insured
retention, uninsured claims or casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage.
47
If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a
portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue
from the property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt
or other financial obligations
related to the property. Material losses in excess of insurance proceeds may occur in the
future. If one or more of our significant properties were to experience a catastrophic loss, it
could seriously disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large expenses to repair or
rebuild the property. Such events could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
Failure to Succeed in New Markets May Limit Our Growth. We have acquired in the past, and we
may acquire in the future if appropriate opportunities arise, apartment communities that are
outside of our existing market. Entering into new markets may expose us to a variety of risks,
and we may not be able to operate successfully in new markets. These risks include, among others:
|
|
|
inability to accurately evaluate local apartment market conditions and local economies; |
|
|
|
inability to hire and retain key personnel; |
|
|
|
lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures; and |
|
|
|
inability to achieve budgeted financial results. |
Risk of Inflation/Deflation. Substantial inflationary or deflationary pressures could have a
negative effect on rental rates and property operating expenses. Although inflation has not
materially impacted our operations in the recent past, increased inflation could have a more
pronounced negative impact on our debt interest and general and administrative expenses, as these
costs could increase at a rate higher than our rental rates.
Potential Liability for Environmental Contamination Could Result in Substantial Costs. Under
various federal, state and local environmental laws, as a current or former owner or operator of
real estate, we could be required to investigate and remediate the effects of contamination of
currently or formerly owned real estate by hazardous or toxic substances, often regardless of our
knowledge of or responsibility for the contamination and solely by virtue of our current or former
ownership or operation of the real estate. In addition, we could be held liable to a governmental
authority or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred
in connection with the contamination. These costs could be substantial, and in many cases
environmental laws create liens in favor of governmental authorities to secure their payment. The
presence of such substances or a failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination could
materially and adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent an affected property.
Property Ownership Through Joint Ventures May Limit Our Ability to Act Exclusively in Our
Interest. We have in the past and may in the future develop and acquire properties in joint
ventures with other persons or entities when we believe circumstances warrant the use of such
structures. If we use such a structure, we could become engaged in a dispute with one or more of
our joint venture partners that might affect our ability to operate a jointly-owned property.
Moreover, joint venture partners may have business, economic or other objectives that are
inconsistent with our objectives, including objectives that relate to the appropriate timing and
terms of any sale or refinancing of a property. In some instances, joint venture partners may have
competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest.
Compliance or Failure to Comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or Other
Safety Regulations and Requirements Could Result in Substantial Costs. The Americans with
Disabilities Act generally requires that public buildings, including our properties, be made
accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the
federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. From time to time claims may be
asserted against us with respect to some of our properties under this Act. If, under the Americans
with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in
one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
48
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such
as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements,
we could incur fines or
private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether
compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures that will
affect our cash flow and results of operations.
Real Estate Tax and Other Laws. Generally we do not directly pass through costs resulting
from compliance with or changes in real estate tax laws to residential property tenants. We also do
not generally pass through increases in income, service or other taxes, to tenants under leases.
These costs may adversely affect net operating income and the ability to make distributions to
stockholders. Similarly, compliance with or changes in (i) laws increasing the potential liability
for environmental conditions existing on properties or the restrictions on discharges or other
conditions or (ii) rent control or rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating housing, such
as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, may result in
significant unanticipated expenditures, which would adversely affect funds from operations and the
ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Risk of Damage from Catastrophic Weather Events. Certain of our communities are located in
the general vicinity of active earthquake faults, mudslides and fires, and others where there are
hurricanes, tornadoes or risks of other inclement weather. The adverse weather events could cause
damage or losses that may be greater than insured levels. In the event of a loss in excess of
insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected community, as well as
anticipated future revenue from that community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any
mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. Any such loss could
materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
Actual or Threatened Terrorist Attacks May Have an Adverse Effect on Our Business and
Operating Results and Could Decrease the Value of Our Assets. Actual or threatened terrorist
attacks and other acts of violence or war could have a material adverse effect on our business and
operating results. Attacks that directly impact one or more of our apartment communities could
significantly affect our ability to operate those communities and thereby impair our ability to
achieve our expected results. Further, our insurance coverage may not cover all losses caused by a
terrorist attack. In addition, the adverse effects that such violent acts and threats of future
attacks could have on the U.S. economy could similarly have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations.
Any Weaknesses Identified in Our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Could Have an
Adverse Effect on Our Stock Price. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to
evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify one or more
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor
confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could have an
adverse effect on our stock price.
Our Success Depends on Our Senior Management. Our success depends upon the retention of our
senior management, whose continued service in not guaranteed. We may not be able to find qualified
replacements for the individuals who make up our senior management if their services should no
longer be available to us. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management
team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Financing
Insufficient Cash Flow Could Affect Our Debt Financing and Create Refinancing Risk. We are
subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our operating
income and cash flow will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, or
could restrict our borrowing capacity under our line of credit due to debt covenant restraints.
Sufficient cash flow may not be available to make all required principal payments and still satisfy
our distribution requirements to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and
the full limits of our line of credit may not be available to us if our operating performance falls
outside the constraints of our debt covenants. Additionally, we are likely to need to refinance
substantially all of our outstanding debt as it matures. We may not be able to refinance existing
debt, or the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt,
which could create pressures to sell assets or to issue additional equity when we
would otherwise not choose to do so. In addition, our failure to comply with our debt
covenants could result in a requirement to repay our indebtedness prior to its maturity, which
could have an adverse effect on our cash flow and increase our financing costs.
49
Failure to Generate Sufficient Revenue Could Impair Debt Service Payments and Distributions to
Stockholders. If our apartment communities do not generate sufficient net rental income to meet
rental expenses, our ability to make required payments of interest and principal on our debt
securities and to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected. The following
factors, among others, may affect the net rental income generated by our apartment communities:
|
|
|
the national and local economies; |
|
|
|
local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of apartment homes; |
|
|
|
tenants perceptions of the safety, convenience, and attractiveness of our communities
and the neighborhoods where they are located; |
|
|
|
our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance; |
|
|
|
rental expenses, including real estate taxes and utilities; |
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing; and |
|
|
|
changes in tax and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other
laws regulating multi-family housing. |
Expenses associated with our investment in an apartment community, such as debt service, real
estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a
reduction in rental income from that community. If a community is mortgaged to secure payment of
debt and we are unable to make the mortgage payments, we could sustain a loss as a result of
foreclosure on the community or the exercise of other remedies by the mortgage holder.
Debt Level May Be Increased. Our current debt policy does not contain any limitations on the
level of debt that we may incur, although our ability to incur debt is limited by covenants in our
bank and other credit agreements. We manage our debt to be in compliance with these debt covenants,
but subject to compliance with these covenants, we may increase the amount of our debt at any time
without a concurrent improvement in our ability to service the additional debt.
Financing May Not Be Available and Could Be Dilutive. Our ability to execute our business
strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines
of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including common and
preferred equity. We and other companies in the real estate industry have experienced limited
availability of financing from time to time. If we issue additional equity securities to finance
developments and acquisitions instead of incurring debt, the interests of our existing stockholders
could be diluted.
Financing Could be Impacted by Negative Capital Market Conditions. Recently, domestic
financial markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. While this condition has
occurred most visibly within the subprime mortgage lending sector of the credit market, liquidity
has tightened in overall domestic financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity
capital markets. Consequently, there is greater risk that the financial institutions we do
business with could experience disruptions that would negatively affect our ability to obtain
financing.
50
Disruptions in Financial Markets May Adversely Impact Availability and Cost of Credit, Impact
Our Tenant Base, and Have other Adverse Effects on Us and the Market Price of Our Stock. Our
ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance debt obligations will depend on our operating
and financial performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to
financial, business and other factors beyond our control. The United States stock and credit
markets have recently experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity
disruptions, which have caused market prices of many
stocks to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen
considerably. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the financial markets,
making terms for certain financings less attractive, and in some cases have resulted in the
unavailability of financing. Continued uncertainty in the stock and credit markets may negatively
impact our ability to access additional financing for acquisitions, development of our properties
and other purposes at reasonable terms, which may negatively affect our business. Additionally, due
to this uncertainty, we may be unable to refinance our existing indebtedness or the terms of any
refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of our existing indebtedness. If we are not
successful in refinancing this debt when it becomes due, we may be forced to dispose of properties
on disadvantageous terms, which might adversely affect our ability to service other debt and to
meet our other obligations. A prolonged downturn in the financial markets may cause us to seek
alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our
business plan accordingly. These events also may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise
capital through the issuance of our common or preferred stock. The disruptions in the financial
markets have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on the market value of our
common shares and other adverse effects on us and our business.
Prospective buyers of our properties may also experience difficulty in obtaining debt
financing which might make it more difficult for us to sell properties at acceptable pricing
levels. Current tightening of credit in financial markets and increasing unemployment may also
adversely affect the ability of tenants to meet their lease obligations and for us to continue
increasing rents on a prospective basis. Disruptions in the credit and financial markets may also
have other adverse effects on us and the overall economy.
The Soundness of Financial Institutions Could Adversely Affect Us. We have relationships with
many financial institutions, including lenders under our credit facilities, and, from time to time,
we execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. As a result,
defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, financial institutions or the financial services
industry generally, could result in losses or defaults by these institutions. In the event that the
volatility of the financial markets adversely affects these financial institutions or
counterparties, we or other parties to the transactions with us may be unable to complete
transactions as intended, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Changing Interest Rates Could Increase Interest Costs and Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow and
the Market Price of Our Securities. We currently have, and expect to incur in the future,
interest-bearing debt at rates that vary with market interest rates. As of June 30, 2009, we had
approximately $563.7 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding, which constitutes
approximately 17.5% of our total outstanding indebtedness as of such date. An increase in interest
rates would increase our interest expenses and increase the costs of refinancing existing
indebtedness and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates could adversely affect
cash flow and our ability to service our debt and to make distributions to security holders. The
effect of prolonged interest rate increases could negatively impact our ability to make
acquisitions and develop properties. In addition, an increase in market interest rates may lead
our security holders to demand a higher annual yield, which could adversely affect the market price
of our common and preferred stock and debt securities.
Interest Rate Hedging Contracts May Be Ineffective and May Result in Material Charges. From
time to time when we anticipate issuing debt securities, we may seek to limit our exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates during the period prior to the pricing of the securities by entering
into interest rate hedging contracts. We may do this to increase the predictability of our
financing costs. Also, from time to time we may rely on interest rate hedging contracts to limit
our exposure under variable rate debt to unfavorable changes in market interest rates. If the terms
of new debt securities are not within the parameters of, or market interest rates fall below that
which we incur under a particular interest rate hedging contract, the contract is ineffective.
Furthermore, the settlement of interest rate hedging contracts has involved and may in the future
involve material charges.
51
Risks Related to Tax Laws
We Would Incur Adverse Tax Consequences if We Fail to Qualify as a REIT. We have elected to
be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. Our qualification as a REIT requires us to
satisfy numerous requirements, some on an annual and quarterly basis, established under highly
technical and complex Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative
interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not
entirely within our control. We intend that our current organization and method of operation enable
us to continue to qualify as a REIT, but we may not so qualify or we may not be able to remain so
qualified in the future. In addition, U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and other
corporations and the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended at any time,
potentially with retroactive effect. Future legislation, new regulations, administrative
interpretations or court decisions could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or
adversely affect our stockholders.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate
rates, and would not be allowed to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our
taxable income. Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under certain statutory
provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following
the year in which we first failed to qualify. The additional tax liability from the failure to
qualify as a REIT would reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for investment or
distribution to our stockholders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value
of our securities and our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, we would no longer be
required to make distributions to our stockholders. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we
will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.
REITs May Pay a Portion of Dividends in Common Stock. In December 2008, the Internal Revenue
Service issued Revenue Procedure 2008-68, providing temporary guidance that assists publicly traded
REITs in satisfying their tax-related distribution requirements while conserving cash. This
temporary guidance is intended to permit REITs to limit cash distributions in order to maintain
liquidity during the current downturn in economic conditions. Under this guidance, effective
January 1, 2008 and ending on or before December 31, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service will treat
a distribution of stock by a publicly traded REIT, pursuant to certain elections to receive stock
or cash, as a taxable distribution of property. The amount of such stock distribution will be
treated as equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead. The guidance permits
REITs to limit the aggregate amount of cash available to stockholders pursuant to the election to
10% of the aggregate distribution of cash and stock taken together. If we pay a portion of our
dividends in shares of our common stock pursuant to this temporary guidance, our stockholders may
receive less cash than they received in distributions in prior years and the market value of our
securities may decline.
We May Conduct a Portion of Our Business Through Taxable REIT Subsidiaries, Which are Subject
to Certain Tax Risks. We have established several taxable REIT subsidiaries. Despite our
qualification as a REIT, our taxable REIT subsidiaries must pay income tax on their taxable income.
In addition, we must comply with various tests to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes, and our income from and investments in our taxable REIT subsidiaries generally do not
constitute permissible income and investments for these tests. While we will attempt to ensure that
our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries will not adversely affect our REIT qualification,
we cannot provide assurance that we will successfully achieve that result. Furthermore, we may be
subject to a 100% penalty tax, we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real
property sales, or our taxable REIT subsidiaries may be denied deductions, to the extent our
dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not deemed to be arms length in nature or are
otherwise not respected.
REIT Distribution Requirements Limit Our Available Cash. As a REIT, we are subject to annual
distribution requirements, which limit the amount of cash we retain for other business purposes,
including amounts to fund our growth. We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our
net REIT taxable income, excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed earnings not
to be subject to corporate income tax. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to
comply with the requirements of the Code. However, differences in timing between the recognition
of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets or borrow funds on
a short-term or long-term basis to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code.
52
Certain Property Transfers May Generate Prohibited Transaction Income, Resulting in a Penalty
Tax on Gain Attributable to the Transaction. From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise
dispose of some of our properties. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from
transfers of properties that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the
ordinary course of business would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction and subject to
a 100% penalty tax. Since we acquire properties for investment purposes, we do not believe that our
occasional transfers or disposals of property are prohibited transactions. However, whether
property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and
circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that
certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. If the Internal
Revenue Service were to argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a
prohibited transaction, then we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable
to us from the prohibited transaction and we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on
real property sales. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our
ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
We Could Face Possible State and Local Tax Audits and Adverse Changes in State and Local Tax
Laws. As discussed in the risk factors above, because we are organized and qualify as a REIT we
are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but we are subject to certain state and local
taxes. From time to time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which
may result in an increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and
municipalities in which we own apartment communities may lead to an increase in the frequency and
size of such changes. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional state and local
taxes. These increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and the amount of
cash available for the payment of distributions to our stockholders. In the normal course of
business, entities through which we own real estate may also become subject to tax audits. If such
entities become subject to state or local tax audits, the ultimate result of such audits could have
an adverse effect on our financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Shares
Changes in Market Conditions and Volatility of Stock Prices Could Adversely Affect the Market
Price of Our Common Stock. The stock markets, including the New York Stock Exchange, on which we
list our common shares, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. As a result,
the market price of our common stock could be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock
may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our
operating performance or prospects.
Maryland Law May Limit the Ability of a Third Party to Acquire Control of Us, Which May Not be
in Our Stockholders Best Interests. Maryland business statutes may limit the ability of a third
party to acquire control of us. As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to various Maryland laws
which may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire our Company and of increasing the
difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if our acquisition would be in our stockholders
best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business
combination transactions between us and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of
our stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without our board of directors prior
approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after
the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders
representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast,
excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides
generally that a person who acquires shares of our equity stock that represents 10% (and certain
higher levels) of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote.
Limitations on Share Ownership and Limitations on the Ability of Our Stockholders to Effect a
Change in Control of Our Company May Prevent Takeovers That are Beneficial to Our Stockholders. One
of the requirements for maintenance of our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax
purposes is that no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned by five or
fewer individuals, including entities specified in the Internal Revenue Code, during the last half
of any taxable year. Our charter contains ownership and transfer restrictions relating to our stock primarily to assist
us in complying with this and other REIT ownership requirements; however, the restrictions may have
the effect of preventing a change of control, which does not threaten REIT status. These
restrictions include a provision that generally limits ownership by any person of more than 9.9% of
the value of our outstanding equity stock, unless our board of directors exempts the person from
such ownership limitation, provided that any such exemption shall not allow the person to exceed
13% of the value of our outstanding equity stock. These provisions may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing someone from taking control of us, even though a change of control might
involve a premium price for our stockholders or might otherwise be in our stockholders best
interests.
53
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
On May 13, 2009, the Company issued and sold a total of 30,727 shares of its Series F
Preferred Stock, without par value, to an accredited investor holding limited partnership
interests, or OP Units, in United Dominion Realty, L.P., which is one of the Companys operating
partnerships. The shares of Series F Preferred Stock were sold at a purchase price of $0.0001 per
share, for an aggregate purchase price of $3.07. Information regarding the offering and sale of
these shares of Series F Preferred Stock is set forth in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-10524).
Because the shares of Series F Preferred Stock were sold to an accredited investor in a
transaction not involving a public offering, the transaction is exempt from registration under the
Securities Act of 1933 in accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
Repurchase of Equity Securities
In February 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a 10 million share repurchase program. In
January 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a new 15 million share repurchase program. Under
the two share repurchase programs, UDR may repurchase shares of our common stock in open market
purchases, block purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. As reflected in the
table below, no shares of common stock were repurchased under these programs during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
that May Yet |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
April 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
May 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
June 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This number reflects the number of shares that were available for
purchase under our 10 million share repurchase program in effect
on December 31, 2007 and our 15 million share repurchase
program announced on January
31, 2008. |
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
On May 13, 2009, UDR held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At the meeting, our stockholders
voted on the election of directors, a proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to
serve as our independent auditors for the year ending
December 31, 2009, and a proposal to amend
and restate the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
54
The following persons were elected directors of UDR, to serve as such for the term indicated and
until the respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their resignation or
removal, by the indicated vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Votes For |
|
|
Votes Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katherine A. Cattanach |
|
|
133,811,214 |
|
|
|
2,230,988 |
|
Eric J. Foss |
|
|
133,879,096 |
|
|
|
2,163,106 |
|
Robert P. Freeman |
|
|
128,493,840 |
|
|
|
7,548,362 |
|
Jon A. Grove |
|
|
132,626,189 |
|
|
|
3,416,013 |
|
James D. Klingbeil |
|
|
132,190,390 |
|
|
|
3,851,812 |
|
Robert C. Larson |
|
|
132,873,571 |
|
|
|
3,168,631 |
|
Thomas R. Oliver |
|
|
133,835,832 |
|
|
|
2,206,370 |
|
Lynne B. Sagalyn |
|
|
132,373,987 |
|
|
|
3,668,215 |
|
Mark J. Sandler |
|
|
128,415,761 |
|
|
|
7,626,411 |
|
Thomas W. Toomey |
|
|
134,226,279 |
|
|
|
1,815,923 |
|
Thomas C. Wajnert |
|
|
129,916,967 |
|
|
|
6,125,235 |
|
The stockholders approved the proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve
as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2009, by the indicated vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
129,727,132
|
|
6,008,575
|
|
306,495
|
|
|
The stockholders approved the proposal to amend and restate the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
by the indicated vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Votes Abstained |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
83,358,431
|
|
26,706,624
|
|
289,805
|
|
|
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
There is no other information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 that was not previously disclosed in a Form 8-K.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits filed or furnished with this report are set forth in the Exhibit Index.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
(registrant)
|
|
Date: August 6, 2009 |
/s/ David L. Messenger
|
|
|
David L. Messenger |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(duly authorized officer, principal financial
officer
and chief accounting officer)
|
|
56
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (as amended through April 1, 2009) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission on April 1, 2009, Commission File No. 1-10524). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
UDR, Inc. 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated May 13, 2009) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed
with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2009, Commission File No. 1-10524). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |