þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
34-0538550 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
One Strawberry Lane Orrville, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices) |
44667-0280 (Zip code) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common shares, no par value Rights to purchase preferred shares |
New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
2
3
4
5
| The Company operates in the competitive food industry and relies on continued demand for the Companys products. | ||
The Company faces competition across its product lines from other food companies with the primary methods and factors in competition being product quality, price, packaging, new product introductions, nutritional value, convenience, customer service, advertising, and promotion. In order to generate future revenues and profits, the Company must continue to sell products that appeal to its customers and consumers. Specifically, there are a number of trends in consumer preferences that may impact the Company and the food industry as a whole including convenience, taste, consumer dietary trends, and obesity, health, and nutritional concerns. | |||
In particular, consumers, public health officials, and government officials are becoming increasingly concerned about the public health consequences associated with weight management, particularly among young people. Prolonged negative perceptions concerning the health implications of certain food products could influence consumer preferences and acceptance of some of the Companys products and marketing programs. Although the Company strives to respond to consumer preferences and social expectations, it may not be successful in these efforts. Increasing public concern regarding health issues and failure to satisfy consumer preferences could decrease demand for certain of the Companys products and adversely affect the Companys profitability. |
6
Continued success is dependent on product innovation, the ability to secure and maintain adequate retail shelf space, and effective trade merchandising, advertising, and marketing programs. Some of the Companys competitors have substantial financial, marketing, and other resources, and competition with them in the Companys various markets and product lines could cause the Company to reduce prices, increase marketing or other expenditures, or lose category share. Category share and growth could be adversely impacted if the Company is not successful in introducing new products. | |||
| The success of the Companys business depends substantially on consumer perceptions of its brands. | ||
The Company believes that maintaining and continually enhancing the value of its brands is critical to the success of its business. Brand value is based in large part on consumer perceptions. Success in promoting and enhancing brand value depends in large part on the Companys ability to provide high quality products. Brand value could diminish significantly as a result of a number of factors, such as if the Company fails to preserve the quality of its products, if the Company is perceived to act in an irresponsible manner, if the Company or its brands otherwise receive negative publicity, if the brands fail to deliver a consistently positive consumer experience, or if the products become unavailable to consumers. The growing use of social and digital media by consumers increases the speed and extent that information and opinions can be shared. If the Companys brand values are diminished, the Companys revenues and operating results could be materially adversely affected. In addition, anything that harms the Pillsbury, Carnation, Borden, or Dunkin Donuts brands could adversely affect the success of the Companys exclusive licensing agreements with the owners of these brands. | |||
| The Companys operations are subject to the general risks of the food industry. | ||
The food industry is subject to risks posed by food spoilage and contamination, product tampering, product recall, and consumer product liability claims. The Companys operations could be impacted by both genuine and fictitious claims regarding the Companys and its competitors products. In the event of product contamination or tampering, the Company may need to recall some of its products. A widespread product recall could result in significant loss due to the cost of conducting a product recall, including destruction of inventory and the loss of sales resulting from the unavailability of product for a period of time. The Company could also suffer losses from a significant product liability judgment against it. A significant product recall or a product liability judgment, involving either the Company or its competitors, could also result in a loss of consumer confidence in the Companys food products or the food category, and an actual or perceived loss of value of the Companys brands, materially impacting consumer demand. | |||
| The Company could be subject to adverse publicity or claims from consumers. | ||
Certain of the Companys products contain caffeine and other ingredients, the health effects of which are the subject of increasing public scrutiny, including the suggestion that consumption may have adverse health effects. An unfavorable report on the health effects of caffeine or other ingredients present in the Companys products, product recalls or negative publicity or litigation arising from other health risks could significantly reduce the demand for the Companys products. | |||
The Company may also be subject to complaints from or litigation by consumers who allege food and beverage-related illness, or other quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations could materially adversely affect the Company, regardless of whether such allegations are true or whether the Company is ultimately held liable. A lawsuit or claim could result in an adverse decision against the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations. |
7
| The Company may be unable to grow market share of its products. | ||
The Company operates in the competitive food industry whose growth potential is generally correlated to population growth. The Companys success depends in part on its ability to grow its brands faster than the population in general. The Company considers its ability to build and sustain the equity of its brands critical to its market share growth. If the Company does not succeed in these efforts, its market share growth may slow, which could have a material impact on its results of operations. | |||
| The Companys proprietary brands, packaging designs, and manufacturing methods are essential to the value of its business and the inability to protect these could harm the value of its brands and adversely affect the Companys sales and profitability. | ||
The success of the Companys business depends significantly on its brands, know-how, and other intellectual property. The Company relies on a combination of trademarks, service marks, trade secrets, patents, copyrights, and similar rights to protect its intellectual property. The success of the Companys growth strategy depends on its continued ability to use its existing trademarks and service marks in order to maintain and increase brand awareness and further develop its brand. If the Companys efforts to protect its intellectual property are not adequate, or if any third party misappropriates or infringes on its intellectual property, the value of the Companys brand may be harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on its business. From time to time, the Company is engaged in litigation to protect its intellectual property, which could result in substantial costs to the Company as well as diversion of management attention. | |||
In particular, the Company considers its proprietary coffee roasting methods essential to the consistent flavor and richness of its coffee products and, therefore, essential to its coffee brands. Because many of the roasting methods used by the Company are not protected by patents, it may be difficult for the Company to prevent competitors from copying its roasting methods if such methods become known. The Company also believes that its packaging innovations, such as brick packaging technology and its AromaSealTM canisters, are important to the coffee business marketing and operational efforts. If the Companys competitors copy its roasting or packaging methods or develop more advanced roasting or packaging methods, the value of the Companys coffee brands may be diminished, and the Company could lose customers to its competitors. | |||
| The Company uses a single national broker to represent a significant portion of the Companys branded products to the retail grocery trade and any failure by the broker to effectively represent the Company would adversely affect the Companys business. | ||
The Company uses a single national broker to represent a significant portion of branded products to the retail grocery trade. The Companys business would suffer substantial disruption if this broker were to default in the performance of its obligations to perform brokerage services or if this broker fails to effectively represent the Company to the retail grocery trade. | |||
| The Company may be unable to maintain or improve its profit margins in the concentrated retail environment. In addition, the loss of the Companys largest customer could negatively impact its sales and profits. | ||
Sales to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries amounted to approximately 26 percent of the Companys net sales in 2011. These sales are primarily included in the three U.S. retail market segments. Trade receivables at April 30, 2011, included amounts due from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its subsidiaries of approximately $87.6 million. During 2011, the Companys top 10 customers, collectively, accounted for approximately 55 percent of consolidated net sales. The Company expects that a significant portion of its revenues will continue to be derived from a small number of customers. The Companys customers are generally not contractually obligated to purchase from the Company. These customers make purchase decisions based on a combination of price, product quality, consumer demand, customer service performance, their |
8
desired inventory levels, and other factors. Changes in customers strategies, including a reduction in the number of brands they carry or a shift of shelf space to private label products, may adversely affect sales. Additionally, the Companys customers may face financial or other difficulties that may impact their operations and their purchases from the Company, which could adversely affect results of operations. Customers also may respond to price increases by reducing distribution, resulting in reduced sales of the Companys products. If sales of products to one or more of these customers are reduced, this reduction may have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition, and results of operations. Bankruptcy or other business disruption of a significant customer could adversely affect the Companys results of operations. | |||
| Loss or interruption of supply from single-source suppliers of raw materials and finished goods could have a disruptive effect on the Companys business and adversely affect its results of operations. | ||
The Company has elected to source certain raw materials, such as packaging for its most popular Folgers® coffee products, as well as its Jif® peanut butter and Crisco® oil products, and finished goods from single sources of supply. While the Company believes that alternative sources of these raw materials and finished goods could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, loss or an extended interruption in supplies from a single-source supplier would result in additional costs, could have a disruptive short-term effect on the Companys business, and could adversely affect its results of operations. | |||
| The results of the Company may be adversely impacted as a result of increased cost, limited availability and/or insufficient quality of raw materials, including commodities and agricultural products. | ||
The Company and its business partners purchase and use large quantities of many different commodities and agricultural products in the manufacturing of the Companys products including green coffee, peanuts, corn sweeteners, edible oils, sugar, fruit, wheat, milk, and cocoa. In addition, the Company and its business partners utilize significant quantities of plastic, glass, and cardboard to package the Companys products and natural gas and fuel oil to manufacture, package, and distribute the Companys products. These commodities, agricultural products, and other materials are subject to price volatility and can fluctuate due to conditions that are difficult to predict, including global supply and demand, commodity market fluctuations, crop sizes and yield fluctuations, weather, currency fluctuations, speculative influences, trade agreements, political unrest, consumer demand, and changes in governmental agricultural programs. For example, in late fiscal 2011, costs to acquire peanuts increased, in part, due to adverse weather conditions. Although the Company utilizes forward contracts and commodity futures and option contracts to manage commodity price volatility in some instances, commodity price increases ultimately result in corresponding increases in the Companys raw material and energy costs. | |||
In particular, the price of green coffee has recently been subject to significant volatility and, in fiscal 2011, green coffee commodity prices increased significantly. In mid-March 2011, green coffee commodity prices reached a 34-year high at a level approximately 50 percent higher than they were eight months earlier and over 100 percent higher than they were a year earlier. The Company expects the green coffee commodity market to continue to be challenging as the market continues to be influenced by worldwide demand, the weakness of the dollar, speculative trading, and weather and as producers in Brazil-the worlds largest coffee producing country-enter a cyclically low production year in its biennial crop cycle. Due to the significance of green coffee to the Companys coffee business, combined with the Companys ability to only partially mitigate future price risk through purchasing practices and hedging activities, significant increases or decreases in the cost of green coffee could have an adverse impact on the Companys profitability. |
9
| The Company may be limited in its ability to pass cost increases on to its customers in the form of price increases or may realize a decrease in sales volume to the extent price increases are implemented. | ||
The Company may not be able to pass some or all of any increases in the price of raw materials, energy, and other input costs to its customers by raising prices. To the extent competitors do not also increase their prices, customers and consumers may choose to purchase competing products or may shift purchases to lower-priced private label or other value offerings which may adversely affect the Companys results of operations. | |||
Consumers may be less willing or able to pay a price differential for the Companys branded products, and may increasingly purchase more lower-priced offerings and may forego some purchases altogether, especially during economic downturns. Retailers may also increase levels of promotional activity for lower-priced or value offerings as they seek to maintain sales volumes during times of economic uncertainty. Accordingly, sales volumes of the Companys branded products could be reduced or lead to a shift in sales mix toward its lower margin offerings. As a result, decreased demand for the Companys products may adversely affect its results of operations. | |||
| The Companys efforts to manage commodity and other price volatility through derivative instruments could adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition. | ||
The Company uses derivative instruments, including commodity futures and options, to reduce the price volatility associated with anticipated commodity purchases. The extent of the Companys derivative position at any given time depends on the Companys assessment of the markets for these commodities. If the Company fails to take a derivative position and costs subsequently increase, or if it institutes a position and costs subsequently decrease, the Companys costs may be greater than anticipated or higher than its competitors costs and financial results could be adversely affected. In addition, the Companys liquidity may be adversely impacted by the cash margin requirements of the commodities exchanges or the failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with a contract. | |||
| The results of the Company may be adversely impacted by growth in alternative energy markets. | ||
The Company competes for certain raw materials, notably corn and soy-based agricultural products, with the emerging bio-fuels industry. Growth in the bio-fuels industry, which is typically linked to increases in gasoline and diesel prices, may limit the supply of certain raw materials available to the Company. Additionally, farm acreage currently devoted to other agricultural products utilized by the Company may be converted to corn or soy resulting in higher cost for other agricultural products utilized by the Company. | |||
| Certain of the Companys products are sourced from single manufacturing sites. | ||
The Company has consolidated its production capacity for certain products into single manufacturing sites. In addition, the Company is proceeding with plans to further consolidate its coffee, fruit spreads, syrups, and topping production as part of its current restructuring project. The Company could experience a production disruption at these or any of its manufacturing sites resulting in a reduction or elimination of the availability of some of the Companys products. If the Company is not able to obtain alternate production capability in a timely manner, a negative impact on the Companys operations could result. |
10
| If there is a significant interruption in the operation of any of the Companys facilities, third-party distribution centers, or suppliers facilities, the Company may not have the capacity to service its customers in a timely manner, thereby reducing its revenues and earnings. | ||
A significant interruption in the operation of any of the Companys facilities, third-party distribution centers, or suppliers facilities, whether as a result of a natural disaster, flu pandemic, or other causes, could significantly impair the Companys ability to operate its business. Notably, after completion of the Companys current restructuring project, substantially all of the Companys coffee production will be in New Orleans which is subject to risks associated with hurricane and other weather-related events. Following Hurricane Katrina in August 2005, production at the New Orleans facility was interrupted for approximately two months, resulting in a significant decline in coffee revenues for several months. A similar significant interruption in the operation of one of the Companys facilities, third-party distribution centers, or suppliers facilities may affect its ability to service all of its customers, and business may be lost to its competitors, resulting in a material adverse effect to the Companys revenues, earnings, and financial position. | |||
| The Companys business could be harmed by strikes or work stoppages. | ||
As of April 30, 2011, approximately 32 percent of the Companys employees, located at 10 facilities, are covered by collective bargaining agreements. These contracts vary in term depending on location. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to renew these collective bargaining agreements on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements, or at all, without production interruptions caused by labor stoppages. If a strike or work stoppage were to occur in connection with negotiations of new collective bargaining agreements, or as a result of disputes under collective bargaining agreements with labor unions, the Companys business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. | |||
| Increases in logistics and other transportation-related costs could adversely impact the Companys results of operations. The Companys ability to competitively serve customers depends on the availability of reliable transportation. | ||
Logistics and other transportation-related costs have a significant impact on the Companys earnings and results of operations. The Company uses multiple forms of transportation to bring the Companys products to market. They include ships, trucks, intermodals, and railcars. Disruption to the timely supply of these services or increases in the cost of these services for any reason, including availability or cost of fuel, regulations affecting the industry, labor shortages in the transportation industry, service failures by third-party service providers, accidents or natural disasters (which may impact the transportation infrastructure or demand for transportation services), could have an adverse effect on the Companys ability to serve its customers, and could have a material adverse effect on financial performance. | |||
| The Company may not achieve cost savings anticipated as a result of its restructuring initiatives. | ||
The Company has periodically commenced restructuring initiatives with the expectation of realizing future benefits including operational efficiencies or cost savings. The future benefits the Company expects from restructuring initiatives may not be realized during the time period expected, or at all, due to unforeseen or changing business conditions. In addition, costs incurred to realize the future benefits may be higher than anticipated and the Companys results of operations could be adversely affected. | |||
| The Companys operations are subject to the general risks associated with acquisitions. | ||
The Companys stated long-term strategy is to own and market leading North American food brands sold in the center of the store. The Company has historically made strategic acquisitions of brands and businesses and intends to do so in the future in support of this strategy. The |
11
success of past and future acquisitions depends on the Companys ability to successfully integrate acquired and existing operations. If the Company is unable to integrate acquisitions successfully, its financial results could suffer. Additional potential risks associated with acquisitions are the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns, additional debt leverage, the loss of key employees and customers of the acquired business, the assumption of unknown liabilities, disputes with sellers, and the inherent risk associated with the Company entering a line of business in which it has no or limited prior experience. | |||
| A material impairment in the carrying value of acquired goodwill or other intangible assets could negatively affect the Companys consolidated operating results and net worth. | ||
A significant portion of the Companys assets is goodwill and other intangible assets, the majority of which are not amortized but are reviewed at least annually for impairment. If the carrying value of these assets exceeds the current estimated fair value, the asset is considered impaired and could result in a noncash charge to earnings. Events and conditions that could result in impairment include a sustained drop in the market price of the Companys common shares, increased competition or loss of market share, product innovation or obsolescence, or product claims that result in a significant loss of sales or profitability over the product life. At April 30, 2011, the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets totaled approximately $5.8 billion, compared to total assets of approximately $8.3 billion and total shareholders equity of approximately $5.3 billion. | |||
The results of the U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment have been impacted by a highly competitive and promotional environment over the last fiscal year. Should competitive pressure in these categories be sustained, long-term assumptions relative to growth rates and profitability of certain brands within the segment may not be attained which could result in a material impairment. As of April 30, 2011, approximately 16 percent of the Companys total goodwill and 11 percent of the Companys total other intangible assets are assigned to the U.S. Retail Oils and Baking Market segment. | |||
| The results of the Company may be adversely impacted as a result of changes in defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan factors or regulations. | ||
The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain of its U.S. and Canadian employees. In addition to the defined benefit pension plans, the Company sponsors several unfunded, defined postretirement plans. The Companys obligations and expense associated with these plans are recorded in the Companys financial statements based on assumptions related to inflation, investment returns, mortality, employee turnover, rate of compensation increases, medical costs, and discount rates. Changes in regulations governing these plans, changes in plan assumptions, and differences between assumed and actual investment returns and interest rates can cause volatility in recorded assets, liabilities, expenses, and future funding requirements. | |||
| The effects of a potential pandemic illness could adversely affect the Companys businesses. | ||
An outbreak of pandemic illness in a given location could severely interfere with and substantially disrupt the Companys supply chain impacting the manufacture and/or shipment of the Companys products, which could have a material adverse effect on its operations. A prolonged recurrence of a pandemic illness could also adversely affect the Companys customers and cause an immediate and prolonged drop in consumer demand for the Companys products. Any of these events could adversely affect the Companys financial condition and results of operations. The general impact, if any, of a pandemic illness on the Companys operations, its results of operations and financial condition is highly speculative, cannot be accurately predicted or quantified, and would depend on numerous factors, including the rate of contagion, the regions most affected, the effectiveness of treatment for the infected population and the rates of mortality and morbidity. |
12
| Changes in tax, environmental, or other regulations and laws, or their application, or failure to comply with existing licensing, trade, and other regulations and laws could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. | ||
The Companys operations are subject to regulation by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, as well as similar and other authorities of Canada, various state, provincial and local governments, and voluntary regulatory and trade associations. | |||
The manufacturing, marketing, packaging, labeling, and distribution of food products are each subject to governmental regulation that is increasingly extensive, encompassing such matters as ingredients, advertising, relations with distributors and retailers, health, safety, and the environment. Additionally, the Company is routinely subject to new or modified tax and securities regulations, other laws and regulation, and accounting and reporting standards. | |||
In the U.S., the Company is required to comply with federal laws, such as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, laws governing equal employment opportunity, and various other federal statutes and regulations. The Company is also subject to various state and local statutes and regulations. For instance, the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (commonly referred to as Proposition 65) requires that a specific warning appear on any product sold in the State of California that contains a substance listed by that state as having been found to cause cancer or birth defects. This law exposes all food and beverage producers to the possibility of having to provide warnings on their products. The detection of even a trace amount of a listed substance can subject an affected product to the requirement of a warning label. Products containing listed substances that occur naturally or that are contributed to such products solely by a municipal water supply are generally exempt from the warning requirement. If the Company is required to add warning labels to any of its products or place warnings in certain locations where its products are sold as a result of Proposition 65, sales of those products could suffer not only in those locations but elsewhere. | |||
Complying with new regulations and laws, or changes to existing regulations and laws, or their application could increase the Companys production costs or adversely affect the Companys sales of certain products. In addition, the Companys failure or inability to comply with applicable regulations and laws could subject the Company to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and financial condition. | |||
| Changes in climate or legal, regulatory or market measures to address climate change may negatively affect the Companys business and operations. | ||
While scientific consensus on the existence, potential causes, or likely outcomes of global climate change has not yet been reached, researchers continue to aggressively explore this issue. However, there already exists significant political and scientific concern that emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases may alter the composition of the global atmosphere in ways that are affecting and are expected to continue affecting the global climate. The emission of such greenhouse gases may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns, and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. In the event that climate change may have a negative effect on agricultural productivity, the Company may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for its products, such as green coffee, peanuts, corn sweeteners, edible oils, sugar, wheat, milk, cocoa, and various fruits and vegetables. The Company may also be subjected to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for water as a result of such change, which could impact its manufacturing and distribution operations. In addition, natural disasters and extreme weather conditions may disrupt the productivity of facilities or the operation of the Companys supply chain. |
13
Increasing concern over climate change also may result in more regulatory requirements related to greenhouse gases. Many states have announced or adopted programs to stabilize and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and federal legislation has been proposed in Congress. It is possible that federal legislation limiting greenhouse gas emissions may be imposed in the U.S. in the future. In the event that regulations are enacted and are more rigorous than existing regulations, the Company may experience significant increases in costs of operation and delivery. In particular, increased regulation of utility providers, fuel emissions, or suppliers could substantially increase the Companys operating, distribution, or supply chain costs. The Company could also face increased costs related to defending and resolving legal claims and other litigation related to climate change. As a result, climate change could negatively affect the Companys results of operations, cash flows, or financial position. | |||
| If the Companys information technology systems fail to perform adequately or the Company is unable to protect such information technology systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches, the Companys operations could be disrupted. | ||
The Company relies on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information. In particular, the Company depends on its information technology infrastructure to effectively manage its business data, supply chain, logistics, accounting and other business processes and for digital marketing activities and electronic communications between Company personnel and its customers and suppliers. If the Company does not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain an appropriate technology infrastructure, the Companys business or financial results could be negatively impacted. In addition, security breaches or system failures of this infrastructure can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. If the Company is unable to prevent such breaches or failures, its operations could be disrupted, or it may suffer financial damage or loss because of lost or misappropriated information. | |||
In addition, the Company has outsourced certain information technology support services and administrative functions, such as accounts payable processing and benefit plan administration, to third-party service providers, and may outsource other functions in the future to achieve cost savings and efficiencies. If the service providers that the Company outsources these functions to do not perform effectively, the Company may not be able to achieve the expected cost savings and may have to incur additional costs in connection with such failure to perform. Depending on the function involved, such failures may also lead to business disruption, processing inefficiencies, the loss of or damage to intellectual property through security breach, the loss of sensitive data through security breach or otherwise. | |||
| Disruptions in the financial markets may adversely affect the Companys ability to access capital in the future. | ||
The Company may need new or additional financing in the future to conduct its operations, expand its business or refinance existing indebtedness. Disruptions in global financial markets and banking systems may make credit and capital markets more difficult for companies to access, even for some companies with established revolving or other credit facilities. Any sustained weakness in the general economic conditions and/or financial markets in the U.S. or globally could adversely affect the Companys ability to raise capital on favorable terms or at all. From time to time, the Company has relied, and also may rely in the future, on access to financial markets as a source of liquidity for working capital requirements, acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. The Companys access to funds under its revolving credit facility is dependent on the ability of the financial institutions that are parties to that facility to meet their funding commitments. The obligations of the financial institutions under the Companys revolving credit facility are several and not joint and, as a result, a funding default by one or more institutions does not need to be made up by the others. Long-term volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing or increased regulation of financial institutions, reduced alternatives, or |
14
failure of significant financial institutions could adversely affect the Companys access to the liquidity needed for its businesses in the longer term. Such disruptions could require the Company to take measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements or other funding for its business needs can be arranged. Disruptions in the capital and credit markets could result in higher interest rates on publicly issued debt securities and increased costs under credit facilities. Continuation of these disruptions would increase the Companys interest expense and capital costs and could adversely affect its results of operations and financial position. |
None. |
15
U.S. Locations | Products Produced/Processed | |
Chico, California
|
Fruit and vegetable juices, beverages, and natural food products | |
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
Shortening and oils | |
El Paso, Texas
|
Canned milk | |
Grandview, Washington
|
Fruit | |
Havre de Grace, Maryland
|
Fruit and vegetable juices, beverages, and natural food products | |
Kansas City, Missouri (B)
|
Coffee | |
Lexington, Kentucky
|
Peanut butter | |
Memphis, Tennessee (B)
|
Fruit spreads, toppings, syrups | |
New Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
|
Peanut butter and combination peanut butter and jelly products | |
New Orleans, Louisiana (two facilities)
|
Coffee | |
Orrville, Ohio
|
Fruit spreads, toppings, syrups | |
Oxnard, California
|
Fruit | |
Ripon, Wisconsin
|
Fruit spreads, toppings, syrups, condiments | |
Scottsville, Kentucky
|
Frozen sandwiches and ready-to-eat waffles | |
Seneca, Missouri
|
Canned milk | |
Toledo, Ohio
|
Baking mixes, frostings, and flour |
Canada Locations | Products Produced/Processed | |
Delhi Township, Ontario (B)
|
Pickles | |
Dunnville, Ontario (B)
|
Pickles and relish condiments | |
Sherbrooke, Quebec
|
Canned milk | |
Ste. Marie, Quebec (B)
|
Fruit spreads, sweet spreads, fruit industrial products |
(A) | The Company leases the land, but owns the buildings, at one of the New Orleans, Louisiana, facilities. | |
(B) | Locations currently expected to close as part of the Companys restructuring plans as described in the Companys 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders on pages 47 and 48 under Note D: Restructuring. |
16
Years | Served as | |||||||||||||
with | an Officer | |||||||||||||
Name | Age | Company | Position | Since | ||||||||||
Timothy P. Smucker
|
67 | 42 | Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer (1) | 1973 | ||||||||||
Richard K. Smucker
|
63 | 38 | Executive Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer (2) | 1974 | ||||||||||
Dennis J. Armstrong
|
56 | 32 | Senior Vice President, Logistics and Operations Support (3) | 2007 | ||||||||||
Mark R. Belgya
|
50 | 26 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (4) | 1997 | ||||||||||
James A. Brown
|
50 | 26 | Vice President, U.S. Grocery Sales (5) | 2009 | ||||||||||
Vincent C. Byrd
|
56 | 34 | President and Chief Operating Officer (6) | 1988 | ||||||||||
John W. Denman
|
54 | 32 | Vice President and Controller (7) | 2005 | ||||||||||
Barry C. Dunaway
|
48 | 24 | Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (8) | 2001 | ||||||||||
Jeannette L. Knudsen
|
41 | 8 | Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary (9) | 2009 | ||||||||||
John F. Mayer
|
55 | 31 | Vice President, Sales, Grocery Market (10) | 2004 | ||||||||||
Kenneth A. Miller
|
62 | 31 | Vice President, Alternate Channels (11) | 2007 | ||||||||||
Steven Oakland
|
50 | 28 | President, International, Foodservice, and Natural Foods (12) | 1999 | ||||||||||
Andrew G. Platt
|
55 | 28 | Vice President, Information Services and Chief Information Officer | 2004 | ||||||||||
Christopher P.
Resweber
|
49 | 23 | Vice President, Marketing Communications (13) | 2004 | ||||||||||
Julia L. Sabin
|
51 | 27 | Vice President and General Manager, Smucker Natural Foods, Inc. (14) | 2007 | ||||||||||
Mark T. Smucker
|
41 | 13 | President, U.S. Retail Coffee (15) | 2001 | ||||||||||
Paul Smucker Wagstaff |
41 | 15 | President, U.S. Retail Consumer Foods (16) | 2001 | ||||||||||
Albert W. Yeagley
|
63 | 37 | Vice President, Industry and Government Affairs (17) | 2007 |
(1) | Mr. Timothy Smucker was elected to his present position in August 2008, having served as Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer since February 2001. In March 2011, Mr. Timothy Smucker was re-elected Chairman of the Board, but will no longer serve as Co-Chief Executive Officer, to be effective August 16, 2011. | |
(2) | Mr. Richard Smucker was elected to his present position in August 2008, having served as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer since February 2001. In March 2011, Mr. Richard Smucker was elected the sole Chief Executive Officer, but will no longer serve as the Executive Chairman, to be effective August 16, 2011. | |
(3) | Mr. Armstrong was elected to his present position in October 2009, having served as Vice President, Logistics and Operations Support since February 2007. | |
(4) | Mr. Belgya was elected to his present position in October 2009, having served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2008. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since January 2005. |
17
(5) | Mr. Brown was elected to his present position in April 2009, effective as of June 30, 2009, having served as Director, National Sales, Grocery Market since February 2002. | |
(6) | Mr. Byrd was elected to his present position in March 2011, effective as of May 1, 2011, having served as President, U.S. Retail Coffee since August 2008. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President, Consumer Market since February 2004. | |
(7) | Mr. Denman was elected to his present position in August 2005, having served as Assistant Controller since May 2005. | |
(8) | Mr. Dunaway was elected to his present position in March 2011, effective as of May 1, 2011, having served as Senior Vice President, Corporate and Organizational Development since August 2008. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President, Corporate Development since November 2001. | |
(9) | Ms. Knudsen was elected to her present position in August 2010, having served as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since April 2010, and as Corporate Secretary since April 2009. Prior to that time, she served as Securities and Acquisition Counsel and Assistant Secretary since November 2007 and Corporate Attorney since August 2002. | |
(10) | Mr. Mayer was elected to his present position in April 2009, effective as of June 30, 2009, having served as Vice President, Customer Development since August 2004. | |
(11) | Mr. Miller was elected to his present position in February 2007, having served as General Manager, Alternate Channels since September 2005. | |
(12) | Mr. Oakland was elected to his present position in March 2011, effective as of May 1, 2011, having served as President, U.S. Retail Smuckers, Jif and Hungry Jack since August 2008. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Oils and Baking since November 2001. | |
(13) | Mr. Resweber was elected to his present position in July 2009, having served as Vice President, Marketing Services since August 2004. | |
(14) | Ms. Sabin was elected to her present position in February 2009, having served as Vice President and General Manager, Smucker Quality Beverages, Inc. since February 2007. Prior to that time, she served as General Manager, Smucker Quality Beverages, Inc. since February 1998. | |
(15) | Mr. Mark Smucker was elected to his present position in March 2011, effective as of May 1, 2011, having served as President, Special Markets since August 2008. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President, International since July 2007 and Vice President, International and Managing Director, Canada since May 2006. | |
(16) | Mr. Wagstaff was elected to his present position in March 2011, effective as of May 1, 2011, having served as President, U.S. Retail Oils and Baking since August 2008. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President, Foodservice and Beverage Markets since May 2006. | |
(17) | Mr. Yeagley was elected to his present position in January 2009, having served as Vice President, Quality Assurance since February 2007. Prior to that time, he served as Director, Corporate Quality Assurance since July 2001. |
18
(d) | ||||||||||||||||
Maximum number | ||||||||||||||||
(c) | (or approximate | |||||||||||||||
(b) | Total number of | dollar value) of | ||||||||||||||
(a) | Average | shares purchased | shares that may yet | |||||||||||||
Total number of | price | as part of publicly | be purchased under | |||||||||||||
shares | paid per | announced plans | the plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | purchased | share | or programs | programs | ||||||||||||
February 1, 2011 - February
28, 2011 |
960 | 38.79 | 0 | 5,000,000 | ||||||||||||
March 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011 |
1,379,103 | 71.99 | 1,377,600 | 3,622,400 | ||||||||||||
April 1, 2011 - April 30, 2011 |
582,747 | 72.69 | 581,500 | 3,040,900 | ||||||||||||
Total |
1,962,810 | $ | 72.18 | 1,959,100 | 3,040,900 | |||||||||||
Information set forth in the table above represents activity in the Companys fourth fiscal quarter. | ||
(a) | Shares in this column include shares repurchased as part of publicly announced plans as well as shares repurchased from stock plan recipients in lieu of cash payments. | |
(c) | From March 18, 2011 until April 30, 2011, the Company repurchased 1,959,100 common shares under the Companys share repurchase plan established in March 2011 in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. | |
(d) | At April 30, 2011, the Company had 3,040,900 common shares remaining for repurchase under its January 2011 Board of Directors authorization. From May 1, 2011 through June 22, 2011, no additional common shares were repurchased by the Company. |
19
20
21
(a)(1) | Financial Statements | |
See the Index to Financial Statements, which is included on page F-1 of this Report. | ||
(a)(2) | Financial Statement Schedules | |
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the information required is set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto. | ||
(a)(3) | Exhibits | |
See the Index of Exhibits at page number 25 of this Report. |
22
Date: June 28, 2011 | The J. M. Smucker Company |
|||
/s/ Mark R. Belgya | ||||
By: Mark R. Belgya | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
*
|
||||
Timothy P. Smucker
|
Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Richard K. Smucker
|
Executive Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | June 28, 2011 | ||
/s/ Mark R. Belgya
|
||||
Mark R. Belgya
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
John W. Denman
|
Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Vincent C. Byrd
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
R. Douglas Cowan
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Kathryn W. Dindo
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Paul J. Dolan
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Nancy Lopez Knight
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Elizabeth Valk Long
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Gary A. Oatey
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Mark T. Smucker
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Alex Shumate
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
William H. Steinbrink
|
Director | June 28, 2011 | ||
*
|
||||
Paul Smucker Wagstaff
|
Director | June 28, 2011 |
* | The undersigned, by signing her name hereto, does sign and execute this report pursuant to the powers of attorney executed by the above-named officers and directors of the registrant, which are being filed herewith with |
23
the Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of such officers and directors. |
Date: June 28, 2011 | /s/ Jeannette L. Knudsen | |||
By: Jeannette L. Knudsen | ||||
Attorney-in-Fact |
24
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1
|
Transaction Agreement, dated June 4, 2008, by and among The Procter & Gamble Company, The Folgers Coffee Company, The J. M. Smucker Company, and Moon Merger Sub, Inc. incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
2.2
|
Separation Agreement, dated June 4, 2008, by and among The Procter & Gamble Company, The Folgers Coffee Company, and The J. M. Smucker Company incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
3.1
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation of The J. M. Smucker Company incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
3.2
|
Amended Regulations of The J. M. Smucker Company incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
4
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2009, by and between The J. M. Smucker Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on May 21, 2009 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.1
|
1987 Stock Option Plan incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 1994 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.2
|
Management Incentive Plan incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 1996 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.3
|
Nonemployee Director Stock Plan dated January 1, 1997 incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 1997 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.4
|
1998 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective as of June 6, 2005) incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2005 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.5
|
Form of Restricted Shares Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2005 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.6
|
Form of Deferred Shares Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2005 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.7
|
Form of Deferred Stock Units Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.8
|
The J. M. Smucker Company Top Management Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, restated as of January 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* |
25
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.9
|
First Amendment to The J. M. Smucker Company Top Management Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated as of April 21, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2011.* | |
10.10
|
Amended and Restated Consulting and Noncompete Agreement of Timothy P. Smucker, dated as of December 31, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.11
|
Amended and Restated Consulting and Noncompete Agreement of Richard K. Smucker, dated as of December 31, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.12
|
Termination Amendment to Amended and Restated Consulting and Noncompete Agreement of Timothy P. Smucker, dated as of April 25, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2011.* | |
10.13
|
Termination Amendment to Amended and Restated Consulting and Noncompete Agreement of Richard K. Smucker, dated as of April 25, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2011.* | |
10.14
|
The J. M. Smucker Company Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated as of January 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.15
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Stock-Based Incentive Plan incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.16
|
Amended and Restated Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan, effective August 19, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 24, 2005 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.17
|
The J. M. Smucker Company 2006 Equity Compensation Plan, effective August 17, 2006, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 21, 2006 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.18
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2007 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.19
|
Form of Deferred Stock Units Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2007 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.20
|
The J. M. Smucker Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2010 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.21
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.22
|
Form of Deferred Stock Units Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2010 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* |
26
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.23
|
Form of Special One-Time Grant Deferred Stock Units Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.24
|
Form of Special One-Time Grant Restricted Stock Agreement incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.25
|
Omnibus Amendment to Restricted Stock Agreements for Folgers Employees, dated as of November 4, 2010, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (Commission File No. 001-5111).* | |
10.26
|
The J. M. Smucker Company Nonemployee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2007) incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.27
|
The J. M. Smucker Company Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, restated as of May 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 (Commission File 001-5111).* | |
10.28
|
Amended and Restated Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 24, 2001, by and among General Mills, Inc., The Pillsbury Company, and International Multifoods Corporation incorporated herein by reference to International Multifoods Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13, 2001 (Commission File No. 001-6699). | |
10.29
|
Retail Trademark License Agreement, dated November 13, 2001, between The Pillsbury Company and International Multifoods Corporation incorporated herein by reference to International Multifoods Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 1, 2001 (Commission File No. 001-6699). | |
10.30
|
Amendment to Retail Trademark License Agreement, dated December 23, 2002, between The Pillsbury Company and International Multifoods Corporation incorporated herein by reference to International Multifoods Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 1, 2003 (Commission File No. 001-6699). | |
10.31
|
Closing Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2001, by and among General Mills, Inc., The Pillsbury Company, and International Multifoods Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to International Multifoods Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13, 2001 (Commission File No. 001-6699). | |
10.32
|
Omnibus Amendment Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2003, by and among General Mills, Inc., The Pillsbury Company, International Multifoods Corporation, and Sebesta Blomberg & Associates, Inc. incorporated herein by reference to International Multifoods Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 27, 2003 (Commission File No. 001-6699). | |
10.33
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, by and among The J. M. Smucker Company and each of the Purchasers signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2000 (Commission File 001-5111). |
27
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.34
|
First Amendment, dated as of November 30, 2001, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2004 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.35
|
Second Amendment, dated May 27, 2004, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.36
|
Third Amendment, dated May 31, 2007, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.37
|
Fourth Amendment, dated October 23, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.38
|
Fifth Amendment, dated November 6, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.39
|
Sixth Amendment, dated June 11, 2010, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.40
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, by and among The J. M. Smucker Company and each of the Purchasers signatory thereto incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.41
|
First Amendment, dated May 31, 2007, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.42
|
Second Amendment, dated October 23, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.43
|
Third Amendment, dated November 6, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.44
|
Fourth Amendment, dated June 11, 2010, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.45
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, by and among The J. M. Smucker Company and each of the Purchasers signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (Commission File 001-5111). |
28
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.46
|
First Amendment, dated October 23, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.47
|
Second Amendment, dated November 6, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.48
|
Third Amendment, dated June 11, 2010, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.49
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2008, by and among The J. M. Smucker Company and each of the Purchasers signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.50
|
First Amendment, dated November 6, 2008, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.51
|
Second Amendment, dated June 11, 2010, to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.52
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2010, by and among The J. M. Smucker Company and each of the Purchasers signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Periodic Report on Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2010 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.53
|
Guaranty Agreement, dated November 6, 2008, by The Folgers Coffee Company in favor of the Noteholders defined therein, relating to the guaranty of the obligations of The J. M. Smucker Company under or in respect of the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2000, as amended incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.54
|
Guaranty Agreement, dated November 6, 2008, by The Folgers Coffee Company in favor of the Noteholders defined therein, relating to the guaranty of the obligations of The J. M. Smucker Company under or in respect of the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2004, as amended incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.55
|
Guaranty Agreement, dated November 6, 2008, by The Folgers Coffee Company in favor of the Noteholders defined therein, relating to the guaranty of the obligations of The J. M. Smucker Company under or in respect of the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2007, as amended incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). |
29
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.56
|
Guaranty Agreement, dated November 6, 2008, by The Folgers Coffee Company in favor of the Noteholders defined therein, relating to the guaranty of the obligations of The J. M. Smucker Company under or in respect of the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2008, as amended incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.57
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2011, between The J. M. Smucker Company, Smucker Foods of Canada Corp., the Lenders, the Agent, the Syndication Agent and the Documentation Agent, incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2011 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.58
|
Purchase Agreement, dated January 13, 2005, by and among International Multifoods Corporation, Multifoods Brands, Inc., Fantasia Confections, Inc., Robin Hood Multifoods Corporation, The J. M. Smucker Company, Value Creation Partners, Inc., Best Brands Corp., and IMCB Corp. incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.59
|
Letter Agreement, dated January 24, 2005, and Amendment to Purchase Agreement, dated February 18, 2005, by and among International Multifoods Corporation, Multifoods Brands, Inc., Fantasia Confections, Inc., Smucker Foods of Canada Co. (formerly known as Robin Hood Multifoods Corporation), The J. M. Smucker Company, Value Creation Partners, Inc., Best Brands Corp., and IMCB Corp. incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.60
|
Transition Services Agreement between The Procter & Gamble Company and The Folgers Coffee Company, dated November 6, 2008 incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.61
|
Tax Matters Agreement between The Procter & Gamble Company, The Folgers Coffee Company, and The J. M. Smucker Company, dated November 6, 2008 incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
10.62
|
Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between The Procter & Gamble Company and The Folgers Coffee Company, dated November 6, 2008 incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 (Commission File 001-5111). | |
13
|
Excerpts from 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders. Such Annual Report, except those portions thereof that are expressly incorporated herein by reference, is furnished for the information of the Commission only and is not deemed to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
21
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant | |
23
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
24
|
Powers of Attorney | |
31.1
|
Certifications of Timothy P. Smucker pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. |
30
Exhibit No. | Description | |
31.2
|
Certifications of Richard K. Smucker pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. | |
31.3
|
Certifications of Mark R. Belgya pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended. | |
32
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
31
Annual | ||||
Report to | ||||
Shareholders | ||||
Data incorporated by reference to the 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders of The J. M.
Smucker Company: |
||||
Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
33 | |||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting |
34 | |||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial
Statements |
35 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at April 30, 2011 and 2010 |
38 - 39 | |||
For the years ended April 30, 2011, 2010, and 2009: |
||||
Statements of Consolidated Income |
37 | |||
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows |
40 | |||
Statements of Consolidated Shareholders Equity |
41 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
42 - 67 |
F-1