form10q.htm
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended: March 29, 2013
Or
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from_______________ to________________
Commission File Number 001-05558
Katy Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
75-1277589
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
305 Rock Industrial Park Drive, Bridgeton, Missouri 63044
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (314) 656-4321
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
|
Outstanding at April 26, 2013
|
Common Stock, $1 Par Value
|
|
7,951,176 Shares
|
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
March 29, 2013
|
|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-23
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 29, 2013 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2012
(Amounts in Thousands)
ASSETS
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
9,270 |
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
12,566 |
|
|
|
12,733 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
27,424 |
|
|
|
25,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS:
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
51,873 |
|
|
|
51,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,208 |
|
|
|
55,118 |
|
Less - Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(47,245 |
) |
|
|
(46,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
7,963 |
|
|
|
8,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
37,201 |
|
|
$ |
35,992 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 29, 2013 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2012
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Data)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
7,577 |
|
|
$ |
6,172 |
|
Book overdraft
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,395 |
|
|
|
8,775 |
|
Payable to related party
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
Revolving credit agreement
|
|
|
12,273 |
|
|
|
10,903 |
|
Liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
34,469 |
|
|
|
30,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED REVENUE
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
|
5,702 |
|
|
|
5,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
40,636 |
|
|
|
38,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15% Convertible preferred stock, $100 par value; authorized 1,200,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,131,551 shares; liquidation value $113,155
|
|
|
108,256 |
|
|
|
108,256 |
|
Common stock, $1 par value; authorized 35,000,000 shares; issued 9,822,304 shares
|
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
9,822 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
27,110 |
|
|
|
27,110 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
|
(2,463 |
) |
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(124,711 |
) |
|
|
(123,881 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,871,128 shares
|
|
|
(21,437 |
) |
|
|
(21,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
(3,435 |
) |
|
|
(2,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
37,201 |
|
|
$ |
35,992 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 29, 2013 AND MARCH 30, 2012
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
18,161 |
|
|
$ |
18,365 |
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
15,748 |
|
|
|
15,707 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
3,991 |
|
Severance, restructuring and related charges
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Other, net
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
(1,364 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit from continuing operations
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued business (net of tax)
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(842 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share of common stock - Basic and Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 29, 2013 AND MARCH 30, 2012
(Amounts in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,260 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
(903 |
) |
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(590 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,556 |
) |
|
|
(730 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
Other assets
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
224 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Payable to related party
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,747 |
) |
|
|
(1,602 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(991 |
) |
|
|
(2,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
Decrease in book overdraft
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
Direct costs associated with debt facilities |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash from continuing operations
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
Note 1.
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Consolidation Policy and Basis of Presentation – The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Katy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries in which it has a greater than 50% voting interest or significant influence, collectively “Katy” or the “Company”. All significant intercompany accounts, profits and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 29, 2013 and the related Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 and Cash Flows for the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the interim periods. Interim results may not be indicative of results to be realized for the entire year. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
As discussed in Note 3, on January 24, 2013 the Company announced the closure of the Glit division, on July 24, 2012 the Company announced the closure of the Container division in Norwalk, California, and on September 20, 2012 the Company sold certain assets related to the Gemtex division. The Company accounted for these divisions as discontinued operations, and accordingly, has reclassified the financial results for all periods presented to reflect them as such. Unless otherwise noted, discussions in these notes pertain to the Company’s continuing operations.
Fiscal Year – The Company operates and reports using a 4-4-5 fiscal year which always ends on December 31. As a result, December and January do not typically consist of five and four weeks, respectively. The three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 consisted of 63 and 65 shipping days, respectively.
Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Inventories – The components of inventories are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
5,600 |
|
|
$ |
6,133 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
12,101 |
|
|
|
11,708 |
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
(871 |
) |
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
(4,409 |
) |
|
|
(4,237 |
) |
|
|
$ |
12,566 |
|
|
$ |
12,733 |
|
At March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, approximately 74% and 65%, respectively, of Katy’s inventories were accounted for using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method of costing, while the remaining inventories were accounted for using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Current cost, as determined using the FIFO method, exceeded LIFO cost by $4.4 and $4.2 million at March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Share-Based Payment – Compensation cost recognized during the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 includes: a) compensation cost for all stock options based on the grant date fair value amortized over the options’ vesting period and b) compensation cost for outstanding stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) as of March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 based on the March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 fair value, respectively. The Company re-measures the fair value of SARs each reporting period until the award is settled and compensation expense is recognized each reporting period for changes in fair value and vesting.
Compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The components of compensation expense are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock appreciation right expense
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options are estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. As the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a basis for estimating the expected term, the Company uses the simplified method for estimating the expected term by averaging the minimum and maximum lives expected for each award. In addition, the Company estimated volatility by considering its historical stock volatility over a term comparable to the remaining expected life of each award. The risk-free interest rate is the current yield available on U.S. treasury issues with a remaining term equal to each award. The Company estimates forfeitures using historical results. Its estimates of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from their estimate. There were no stock options granted during the three months ended March 29, 2013 or March 30, 2012.
The fair value of SARs, a liability award, was estimated at March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company estimated the expected term by averaging the minimum and maximum lives expected for each award. In addition, the Company estimated volatility by considering its historical stock volatility over a term comparable to the remaining expected life of each award. The risk-free interest rate was the current yield available on U.S. treasury issues with a remaining term equal to each award. The Company estimates forfeitures using historical results. Its estimates of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from their estimate. The assumptions for expected term, volatility and risk-free rate are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term (years)
|
|
0.9 - 4.6 |
|
|
0.7 - 4.6 |
|
Volatility
|
|
290.0% - 348.6% |
|
|
275.0% - 546.4% |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.1% - 0.7% |
|
|
0.1% - 0.9% |
|
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss – The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are foreign currency translation adjustments and pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments. The balance of foreign currency translation adjustments was $0.5 million at March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The balance of pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments was $1.9 million at March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Segment Reporting – Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief decision maker or group in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief decision maker reviews the results of operations and requests for capital expenditures based on one industry segment: manufacturing, importing and distributing commercial cleaning and storage products. The Company’s entire revenue is generated through this segment.
Note 2.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards – In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance concerning the testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. This guidance gives an entity the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. Under the guidance, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments in this Accounting Standards Update (ASU) are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The Company does not believe the amendments in this ASU will have a material impact of the consolidated financial statements.
Note 3.
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
On January 24, 2013, the Company announced the closure of the Glit division of Continental Commercial Products, LLC. The Company ceased the majority of the operations of the division in the first quarter of 2013. In addition, the Company entered into agreements to sell certain assets related to the Glit division in the first quarter of 2013. The Company will use the net proceeds from the sale of assets to settle the outstanding operating liabilities related to the division, pay off the outstanding borrowing related to the CapEx Sublimit (see Note 4), and reduce the outstanding balance under the PB Loan Agreement (as defined in Note 4 below).
On July 24, 2012, the Company announced the closure of the Container division of CCP. The Company sold certain assets related to the Container division for $0.6 million.
On September 20, 2012, the Company sold certain assets related to the Gemtex division to 2340258 Ontario, Inc. (the “Buyer”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, for $1.0 million, $0.7 million of which will be payable in 48 monthly installments subject to certain prepayment requirements in connection with the generation of excess cash by the Buyer. The Company used the net proceeds from the transaction to reduce its outstanding balance under the PB Loan Agreement (see Note 4).
The closure of the Glit and Container divisions and the sale of the Gemtex division met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations in accordance with GAAP; therefore, the Company has classified the results of the Glit, Container and Gemtex divisions as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets sold as part of the Glit, Container and Gemtex divisions have been recorded as assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale at March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Selected financial data for discontinued operations is summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2013
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Container
Division
|
|
|
Gemtex
Division
|
|
|
Glit
Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
6,960 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
6,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) - net of tax
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
(248 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
817 |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Container
Division
|
|
|
Gemtex
Division
|
|
|
Glit
Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
9,305 |
|
|
$ |
2,822 |
|
|
$ |
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
4,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss - net of tax
|
|
$ |
(903 |
) |
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
(207 |
) |
|
$ |
(582 |
) |
The Company recognized deferred revenue of $1.9 million and $0.1 million in the three months ended March 29, 2013 and the three months ended March 30, 2012, respectively. The recognition of deferred revenue is included in net sales for the Glit Division.
The components of assets and liabilities held for sale as of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
$ |
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
On October 4, 2011, CCP, Glit/Gemtex, Ltd. and 3254018 Nova Scotia Limited (collectively, the “Borrowers”), wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “PB Loan Agreement”) with the PrivateBank and Trust Company (“PrivateBank”). On May 31, 2012, the PB Loan Agreement was amended (the “First Amendment”) to provide additional flexibility under the financial covenants by replacing the minimum fixed charge ratio covenant for the period of April 27, 2012 to October 26, 2012, with a minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization covenant and reduced the borrowing availability by $1 million. In addition, the Company and PrivateBank agreed to certain specified transactions, which could include the sale or disposition of certain assets. The PB Loan Agreement was amended a second time on August 17, 2012 to modify the definition of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. In conjunction with the announced closure of the Glit division (see note 3), the PB Loan Agreement was amended a third time (the “Third Amendment”) on February 18, 2013. The Third Amendment reduced the revolving credit facility from $20 million to $16 million on February 18, 2013 and from $16 million to $15 million on March 15, 2013, which correlates to the current size of the Company. In addition, the Third Amendment established a new fixed charge ratio covenant.
The PB Loan Agreement, as amended, is a $15.0 million revolving credit facility, including a $3.0 million sub-limit for letters of credit. From October 4, 2011 to May 31, 2012 the PB Loan Agreement included a $2.5 million sub-limit for capital expenditures (“CapEx Sublimit”). The proceeds of the Borrowers’ initial borrowing under the PB Loan Agreement were used to repay the Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement, as amended (“PNC Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”) and pay fees and expenses associated with the negotiation and consummation of the credit facility. All extensions of credit under the PB Loan Agreement are collateralized by a first priority security interest in and lien upon substantially all present and future assets and properties of the Company and the Borrowers. The Company guarantees the obligations of the Borrowers under the PB Loan Agreement. There was $12.3 million and $10.9 million outstanding under the PB Loan Agreement as of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The PB Loan Agreement has an expiration date of September 29, 2014 and its borrowing base is determined by eligible inventory and accounts receivable, amounting to $17.5 million at March 29, 2013. The Company’s borrowing base under the PB Loan Agreement is reduced by the outstanding amount of standby and commercial letters of credit and any outstanding borrowings under the CapEx Sublimit. There were $0.2 million in outstanding borrowings under the CapEx Sublimit as of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Currently, the Company’s largest letters of credit relate to its casualty insurance programs. The PB Loan Agreement requires the Company to have a minimum level of availability such that eligible collateral must exceed the sum of its outstanding borrowings and letters of credit by $1.3 million. Total outstanding letters of credit were $1.8 million at March 29, 2013.
Borrowings under the PB Loan Agreement bear interest at a per annum rate equal to the sum of the Prime Rate Revolving Loans Applicable Margin plus the Prime Rate (each as defined in the PB Loan Agreement), or at a per annum rate equal to the sum of the LIBOR Rate Revolving Loans Applicable Margin plus the LIBOR Rate (each as defined in the PB Loan Agreement) or an aggregate of 4.75% and 4.25% at March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. An unused commitment fee of 50 basis points per annum is payable monthly on the average unused amount of the PB Loan Agreement.
The PB Loan Agreement includes a financial covenant regarding fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with this financial covenant at March 29, 2013.
All of the debt under the PB Loan Agreement is re-priced to current rates at frequent intervals. Therefore, its fair value approximates its carrying value at March 29, 2013. For the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012, the Company had amortization of debt issuance costs, included within interest expense, of $48,000 and $40,000, respectively.
The PB Loan Agreement requires lockbox agreements which provide for all Company receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding. These agreements, combined with the existence of a material adverse effect (“MAE”) clause in the PB Loan Agreement, cause the revolving credit facility to be classified as a current liability, per guidance in the Accounting Standards Codification established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The Company does not expect to repay, or be required to repay, within one year, the balance of the revolving credit facility, which is classified as a current liability. The revolving credit facility does not expire or have a maturity date within one year, but rather has a final expiration date of September 29, 2014. The MAE clause, which is a fairly typical requirement in commercial credit agreements, allows the lender to require the loan to become due if it determines there has been a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations, business, properties, assets, liabilities, condition, or prospects.
Note 5.
|
RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
|
Certain subsidiaries have pension plans covering substantially all of their employees. These plans are noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans. The benefits to be paid under these plans are generally based on employees’ retirement age and years of service. The Company’s funding policies, subject to the minimum funding requirements of employee benefit and tax laws, are to contribute such amounts as determined on an actuarial basis to provide the plans with assets sufficient to meet the benefit obligations. Plan assets consist primarily of fixed income investments, corporate equities and government securities. The Company also provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for some of its retired employees. The postretirement health plans are unfunded.
Information regarding the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans for the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012 is as follows (amounts in thousands):
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
March 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
During the three months ended March 29, 2013, the Company made contributions to the pension plans of $19,000. The Company expects to contribute an additional $57,000 to the pension plans throughout the remainder of 2013. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The fair value of plan assets was determined by using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs per the fair value hierarchy).
Note 6.
|
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
|
The Company has various stock incentive plans that provide for the granting of stock options, nonqualified stock options, SARs, restricted stock, performance units or shares and other incentive awards to certain employees and directors. Options have been granted at or above the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant, typically vest over a three-year period, and are exercisable not less than twelve months or more than ten years after the date of grant. SARs have been granted at or above the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant, typically vest over periods up to three years, and expire ten years from the date of issue. No more than 50% of the cumulative number of vested SARs held by an employee can be exercised in any one calendar year.
The following table summarizes stock option activity under each of the Company’s applicable plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Average
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Life
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 29, 2013
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.64 |
|
1.2 years
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Exercisable at March 29, 2013
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.64 |
|
1.2 years
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The following table summarizes SARs activity under each of the Company’s applicable plans:
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested at December 31, 2012
|
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(3,334 |
) |
Cancelled
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested at March 29, 2013
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Outstanding at March 29, 2013
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
At March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the aggregate liability related to SARs was $112,000 and $33,000, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company and its subsidiaries are generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008.
As of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities, of $81.7 million. Domestic net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards comprised $58.2 million of the deferred tax assets for both periods. Katy’s history of operating losses in many of its taxing jurisdictions provides significant negative evidence with respect to the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income. As a result, valuation allowances have been recorded as of such dates for the full amount of deferred tax assets, net of the amount of deferred tax liabilities.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
Included in the balances at each of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are $0.1 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the recognition of these liabilities would not affect the annual effective tax rate.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to the unrecognized tax benefits in the income tax provision. The Company had approximately $25,000 of interest and penalties accrued at each of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Note 8.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Kohlberg & Co., L.L.C., whose affiliate holds all 1,131,551 shares of the Company’s Convertible Preferred Stock, provides ongoing management oversight and advisory services to the Company. At March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company owed Kohlberg $2.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively, for these services, which is recorded in current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company incurs expense of $0.5 million per year for these services. For each of the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012, $0.1 million is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for these services.
Note 9.
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
General Environmental Claims
The Company and certain of its current and former direct and indirect corporate predecessors, subsidiaries and divisions are involved in remedial activities at certain present and former locations and have been identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), state environmental agencies and private parties as potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) at a number of hazardous waste disposal sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“Superfund”) or equivalent state laws and, as such, may be liable for the cost of cleanup and other remedial activities at these sites. Responsibility for cleanup and other remedial activities at a Superfund site is typically shared among PRPs based on an allocation formula. Under the federal Superfund statute, parties could be held jointly and severally liable, thus subjecting them to potential individual liability for the entire cost of cleanup at the site. Based on its estimate of allocation of liability among PRPs, the probability that other PRPs, many of whom are large, solvent, public companies, will fully pay the costs apportioned to them, currently available information concerning the scope of contamination, estimated remediation costs, estimated legal fees and other factors, the Company has recorded and accrued for environmental liabilities in amounts that it deems reasonable and believes that any liability with respect to these matters in excess of the accruals will not be material. The ultimate costs will depend on a number of factors and the amount currently accrued represents management’s best current estimate on an undiscounted basis of the total costs to be incurred. The Company expects this amount to be substantially paid over the next five to ten years.
Other Claims
There are a number of product liability, asbestos and workers’ compensation claims pending against the Company and its subsidiaries. Many of these claims are proceeding through the litigation process and the final outcome will not be known until a settlement is reached with the claimant or the case is adjudicated. The Company estimates that it can take up to ten years from the date of the injury to reach a final outcome on certain claims. With respect to the product liability and workers’ compensation claims, the Company has provided for its share of expected losses beyond the applicable insurance coverage, including those incurred but not reported to the Company or its insurance providers, which are developed using actuarial techniques. Such accruals are developed using currently available claim information, and represent management’s best estimates, including estimated legal fees, on an undiscounted basis. The ultimate cost of any individual claim can vary based upon, among other factors, the nature of the injury, the duration of the disability period, the length of the claim period, the jurisdiction of the claim and the nature of the final outcome.
Although management believes that the actions specified above in this section individually and in the aggregate are not likely to have outcomes that will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flow, further costs could be significant and will be recorded as a charge to operations when, and if, current information dictates a change in management’s estimates.
Note 10.
|
SEVERANCE, RESTRUCTURING AND RELATED CHARGES
|
In the first quarter of 2013 the Company restructured the shared services functions These changes are reflective of the Company’s efforts to implement a more profitable and efficient business model.
A summary of charges is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 29, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time termination benefits
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
A rollforward of restructuring liabilities from December 31, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
One-time
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
Restructuring liabilities at December 31, 2012
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Additions
|
|
|
284 |
|
Payments
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
- |
|
Restructuring liabilities at March 29, 2013
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements
This report and the information incorporated by reference in this report contain various “forward-looking statements” as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. We have based these forward-looking statements on current expectations and projections about future events and trends affecting the financial condition of our business. Additional information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties is included in Item 1A under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Words and phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “continue,” “is subject to,” and the like are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The results referred to in forward-looking statements may differ materially from actual results because they involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements included herein are as of the date hereof and we undertake no obligation to revise or update such statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. All forward-looking statements should be viewed with caution. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may lead to results that differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us or on our behalf, including, among other things:
|
-
|
Increases in the cost of, or in some cases continuation of, the current price levels of thermoplastic resins, paper board packaging, corn, cotton and other raw materials.
|
|
-
|
Our inability to reduce product costs, including manufacturing, sourcing, freight, and other product costs.
|
|
-
|
Our inability to expand our customer base and increase corresponding revenues.
|
|
-
|
Our inability to achieve product price increases, especially as they relate to potentially higher raw material costs.
|
|
-
|
Unfavorable economic or business conditions, as well as our exposure to the credit risks of our customers and distributors, which may reduce our sales or make it difficult to collect accounts receivable.
|
|
-
|
Competition from foreign and domestic competitors.
|
|
-
|
The potential impact of rising interest rates on our debt outstanding under the PB Loan Agreement.
|
|
-
|
Our inability to meet covenants associated with the PB Loan Agreement.
|
|
-
|
Our inability to access funds under our current loan agreements or refinance our loan agreements given the current instability in the credit markets.
|
|
-
|
Our failure to identify, and promptly and effectively remediate, any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
-
|
The potential impact of rising costs for insurance for properties and various forms of liabilities.
|
|
-
|
Labor issues, including union activities that require an increase in production costs or lead to a strike, thus impairing production and decreasing sales, and labor relations issues at entities involved in our supply chain, including both suppliers and those involved in transportation and shipping.
|
|
-
|
Changes in significant laws and government regulations affecting environmental compliance and income taxes.
|
OVERVIEW
We are a manufacturer, importer and distributor of commercial cleaning and storage products. Our commercial cleaning products are sold primarily to sanitary, maintenance and foodservice distributors that supply end users such as restaurants, hotels, healthcare facilities and schools. Our storage products are primarily sold through major home improvement and mass market retail outlets.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 29, 2013 versus Three Months Ended March 30, 2012
Net sales decreased 1.1% from $18.4 million during the three months ended March 30, 2012 to $18.2 million during the three months ended March 29, 2013. The decrease was a result of two less shipping days during the three months ended March 29, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 30, 2012. There was volume shortfall in our Wilen business unit which was offset by a volume increase in our Continental business unit for the three months ended March 29, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 30, 2012. Changes in net sales resulting from pricing and currency translation were nominal. Gross margin was 13.3% for the three months ended March 29, 2013, a decrease of one percentage point from the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily a result of lower margins on the sales mix. As a result, our gross profit decreased $0.2 million from $2.6 million to $2.4 million.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $3.4 million for the three months ended March 29, 2013, a $0.6 million decrease from the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily due to one-time asset impairments for the three months ended March 30, 2012 and lower legal costs for the three months ended March 29, 2013.
Operating loss was flat at $1.3 million for the three months ended March 30, 2012 and for the three months ended March 29, 2013.
Interest expense increased by $25,000 during the three months ended March 29, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 30, 2012 as a result of higher interest rates and average borrowings under the PB Loan Agreement (as defined below) for the three months ended March 29, 2013.
Loss from continuing operations remained stable for the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012, decreasing by $28,000 to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 29, 2013.
With the announced closure of the Glit division on January 24, 2013, the closure of the Container division on September 20, 2012 and the sale of the Gemtex division on September 20, 2012, all activity associated with these divisions has been classified as discontinued operations. Income from operations for these divisions was $0.6 million for the three months ended March 29, 2013 and a loss of $0.9 million for the three months ended March 30, 2012. Income from operations include the Glit Division’s recognition of $1.9 million and $0.1 million of deferred revenue for the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012.
Overall, we reported a net loss of $0.8 million, or $0.10 per share, for the first quarter of 2013, as compared to a net loss of $2.3 million, or $0.28 per share, for the first quarter of 2012.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We require funding for working capital needs and capital expenditures. We believe that our cash flow from operations and the use of available borrowings under the PB Loan Agreement (as defined below) provide sufficient liquidity for our operations going forward. As of March 29, 2013, we had cash of $0.6 million and outstanding checks of $0.3 million as compared to cash of $0.6 million and outstanding checks of $0.5 million at December 31, 2012. As of March 29, 2013, we had outstanding borrowings of $12.3 million under the PB Loan Agreement. Our unused borrowing availability at March 29, 2013 under the PB Loan Agreement was $0.6 million. As of December 31, 2012, we had outstanding borrowings of $10.9 million with unused borrowing availability of $0.3 million.
PB Loan Agreement
On October 4, 2011, CCP, Glit/Gemtex, Ltd. and 3254018 Nova Scotia Limited (collectively, the “Borrowers”), wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “PB Loan Agreement”) with the PrivateBank and Trust Company (“PrivateBank”). On May 31, 2012, the PB Loan Agreement was amended (the “First Amendment”) to provide additional flexibility under the financial covenants by replacing the minimum fixed charge ratio covenant for the period of April 27, 2012 to October 26, 2012, with a minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization covenant and reduced the borrowing availability by $1 million. In addition, the Company and PrivateBank agreed to certain specified transactions, which could include the sale or disposition of certain assets. The PB Loan Agreement was amended a second time on August 17, 2012 to modify the definition of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. In conjunction with the announced closure of the Glit division (see note 3), the PB Loan Agreement was amended a third time (the “Third Amendment”) on February 18, 2013. The Third Amendment reduced the revolving credit facility from $20 million to $16 million on February 18, 2013 and from $16 million to $15 million on March 15, 2013, which correlates to the current size of the Company. In addition, the Third Amendment established a new fixed charge ratio covenant.
The PB Loan Agreement, as amended, is a $15.0 million revolving credit facility, including a $3.0 million sub-limit for letters of credit. From October 4, 2011 to May 31, 2012 the PB Loan Agreement included a $2.5 million sub-limit for capital expenditures (“CapEx Sublimit”). The proceeds of the Borrowers’ initial borrowing under the PB Loan Agreement were used to repay the Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Security Agreement, as amended (“PNC Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”) and pay fees and expenses associated with the negotiation and consummation of the credit facility. All extensions of credit under the PB Loan Agreement are collateralized by a first priority security interest in and lien upon substantially all present and future assets and properties of the Company and the Borrowers. The Company guarantees the obligations of the Borrowers under the PB Loan Agreement. There was $12.3 million and $10.9 million outstanding under the PB Loan Agreement as of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The PB Loan Agreement has an expiration date of September 29, 2014 and its borrowing base is determined by eligible inventory and accounts receivable, amounting to $17.5 million at March 29, 2013. The Company’s borrowing base under the PB Loan Agreement is reduced by the outstanding amount of standby and commercial letters of credit and any outstanding borrowings under the CapEx Sublimit. There were $0.2 million in outstanding borrowings under the CapEx Sublimit as of March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Currently, the Company’s largest letters of credit relate to its casualty insurance programs. The PB Loan Agreement requires the Company to have a minimum level of availability such that eligible collateral must exceed the sum of its outstanding borrowings and letters of credit by $1.3 million. Total outstanding letters of credit were $1.8 million at March 29, 2013.
Borrowings under the PB Loan Agreement bear interest at a per annum rate equal to the sum of the Prime Rate Revolving Loans Applicable Margin plus the Prime Rate (each as defined in the PB Loan Agreement), or at a per annum rate equal to the sum of the LIBOR Rate Revolving Loans Applicable Margin plus the LIBOR Rate (each as defined in the PB Loan Agreement) or an aggregate of 4.75% and 4.25% at March 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. An unused commitment fee of 50 basis points per annum is payable monthly on the average unused amount of the PB Loan Agreement.
The PB Loan Agreement includes a financial covenant regarding fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with this financial covenant at March 29, 2013.
All of the debt under the PB Loan Agreement is re-priced to current rates at frequent intervals. Therefore, its fair value approximates its carrying value at March 29, 2013. For the three months ended March 29, 2013 and March 30, 2012, the Company had amortization of debt issuance costs, included within interest expense, of $48,000 and $40,000, respectively.
The PB Loan Agreement requires lockbox agreements which provide for all Company receipts to be swept daily to reduce borrowings outstanding. These agreements, combined with the existence of a material adverse effect (“MAE”) clause in the PB Loan Agreement, cause the revolving credit facility to be classified as a current liability, per guidance in the Accounting Standards Codification established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The Company does not expect to repay, or be required to repay, within one year, the balance of the revolving credit facility, which is classified as a current liability. The revolving credit facility does not expire or have a maturity date within one year, but rather has a final expiration date of September 29, 2014. The MAE clause, which is a fairly typical requirement in commercial credit agreements, allows the lender to require the loan to become due if it determines there has been a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations, business, properties, assets, liabilities, condition, or prospects.
Cash Flows
Cash used in operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities was $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to $0.6 million in the same period of 2012. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2013 and in the same period of 2012.
Cash flows provided by financing activities in the first quarter of 2013 reflect a $1.4 million increase in our debt levels and a $0.2 million decrease in our book overdraft since December 31, 2012.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of March 29, 2013, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER CONTINGENCIES
See Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of environmental and other contingencies.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We disclosed details regarding certain of our critical accounting policies in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Part II, Item 7). There have been no changes to these policies as of March 29, 2013.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules, regulations and related forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Katy carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period of our report. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in Katy’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 29, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Katy’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Except as otherwise noted in Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, during the quarter for which this report is filed, there have been no material developments in previously reported legal proceedings, and no other cases or legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business and other nonmaterial proceedings, were brought against the Company.
We are affected by risks specific to us as well as factors that affect all businesses operating in a global market. The significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results are described in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 26, 2012. There has been no material change in those risk factors.
None.
None.
Not applicable.
None.
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
CFO Certification pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
CEO Certification required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
#
|
|
CFO Certification required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
#
|
|
Waiver and Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated February 18, 2013 among Continential Commercial Products, LLC, Glit/Gemtex, LTD., 3254018 Nova Scotia Limited, Katy Industries, Inc. and The PrivateBank and Trust Company.
|
|
101
|
* Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-5: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
# These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Katy Industries, Inc. whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
DATE: May 13, 2013
|
By
|
/s/ David J. Feldman
|
|
|
David J. Feldman
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ James W. Shaffer
|
|
|
James W. Shaffer
|
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
19