Edgar Filing: FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORP

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(AMENDMENT NO. 1)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-12448

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

WASHINGTON

91-1104842

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

23500 - 64th Avenue South

Kent, Washington 98032

(253) 850-3500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.

“Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” In Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.

The number of shares outstanding of common stock, as of January 20, 2006 is 34,661,613 shares.

EXPLANATORY NOTE: As described in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Flow International Corporation has restated its previously filed Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 included in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 20, 2005. As reported in our April 30, 2005 Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1, we previously identified errors in our Consolidated Financial Statements related to the impairment of goodwill, the valuation of anti-dilution warrants, additional costs incurred on percentage-of-completion contracts and the presentation of percentage-of-completion related balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, the computation of stock compensation expense, the allocation of the valuation allowance to deferred tax asset and liability balances, the recording of straight-line rent expense, and the classification of technical service expenses. We previously restated our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2005 included in our originally filed Form 10-Q for these errors. We also determined, as disclosed in our original Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on December 20, 2005, that there was an error in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended October 31, 2004 related to our balance sheet presentation of accounts receivable and cash receipts relating to contracts accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method. We recorded a reduction in receivables and customer deposits of $6.2 million. The effect of this error did not impact total cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.

As reported in our April 30, 2005 Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2, and subsequent to the filing of our original Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005, we also identified errors in our financial statements related to the income tax provision and the recording of minority interest. Our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2005, included in this Form 10-Q/A has been restated to correspond to the April 30, 2005 restated amounts in the Amendment No. 2 to our Form 10-K. We have also identified errors related to the classification of expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004.

We have reviewed our consolidated income tax provision and have concluded that it was incorrectly stated for the three and six months periods ended October 31, 2005 and 2004. These misstatements occurred because we incorrectly calculated the consolidated tax provision by an amount equal to the separate tax provision of Flow Autoclave Systems, Inc. (“Flow Autoclave”). In addition, we inappropriately allocated income taxes between Continuing and Discontinued Operations. We have also reviewed the accounting for minority interest in Flow Autoclave (included in Discontinued Operations) and determined that we had incorrectly recorded minority interest based on pre-tax income rather than on after-tax income. As a result of these errors, the Provision for Income Taxes for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 was understated by $106,000 and $117,000, respectively, and for the three and six months ended October 31, 2004 by $289,000 and $181,000, respectively. Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations was misstated by the same amounts in the respective periods. Loss From Operations of Discontinued Operations for the three months ended October 31, 2005 was overstated by $53,000 and Income from Operations of Discontinued Operations for the six months ended October 31, 2005 was understated by $64,000, and (Loss) From Operations of Discontinued Operations for the three and six months periods ended October 31, 2004 was overstated by $226,000 and $118,000, respectively.

In addition, the cumulative errors related to the minority interest at Flow Autoclave impacted our calculation of the loss on the disposition of the Avure Business (see Note 5). The loss was increased from $261,000 to $1.1 million on an after tax basis.

As a result of the errors referred to above, Net Income for the three and six months periods ended October 31, 2005 was overstated by $939,000 and Net Loss for the three and six month periods ended October 31, 2004 was understated by $63,000.

We also reclassified certain costs and expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months periods ended October 31, 2005 and 2004. These adjustments had no impact on Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations or Net Income (Loss).

The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at October 31, 2005 reflects the cumulative effect of the errors referred to above. Taxes Payable and Other Accrued Taxes in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2005 were understated by $185,000 and the Accumulated Deficit was understated by $185,000. The Accumulated Deficit in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Loss as of April 30, 2004 was overstated by $1,335,000.

As reported in our original Item 4, we previously reported two material weaknesses in our internal controls. We have determined that these weaknesses contributed to the restatements referred to above and we have not yet completed their remediation. We have updated our disclosures in our Item 4 report included in this Form 10-Q/A to address this restatement.

Items in the Form 10-Q/A amended by this filing are:

Part I: Financial Information

Item 1 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on pages 5-9 and Notes 2, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 thereto

Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Pages 25-38

Item 4 Controls and Procedures

Part II:

Item 6 Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1

Exhibit 31.2

Exhibit 32.1

Except as described above, all other information is unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the original filing on December 20, 2005 and this Form 10-Q/A does not otherwise reflect events occurring after the original filing or otherwise modify or update these disclosures. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission subsequent to the filing of the original Form 10-Q.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

INDEX


			Page
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - October 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005	5

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Six Months Ended October 31, 2005 and 2004	6

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended October 31, 2005 and 2004	7

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) and Comprehensive Loss - Six Months Ended October 31, 2005 and 2004	9

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	10

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	41

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41

	Item 2.	Changes in Securities; Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	41

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	41

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	41

	Item 5.	Other Information	41

	Item 6.	Exhibits	41

Signatures			43

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited; in thousands, except share amounts)


	October 31, 2005			April 30, 2005
	(restated)			(restated)
ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	24,436		$	12,976
Restricted Cash		921			469
Receivables, Net		28,150			38,325
Receivable from Purchaser of Avure Business		13,049			—
Inventories, Net		19,402			24,218
Prepaid Expenses		4,340			6,046
Other Current Assets		549			2,632

Total Current Assets		90,847			84,666
Property and Equipment, Net		10,111			12,634
Intangible Assets, Net		3,057			14,644
Goodwill		2,764			2,764
Deferred Income Taxes		63			1,532
Other Assets		2,020			2,227

	$	108,862		$	118,467

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Current Liabilities:
Notes Payable	$	1,011		$	3,531
Current Portion of Long-Term Obligations		426			9,912
Accounts Payable		17,224			20,842
Accrued Payroll and Related Liabilities		5,372			8,819
Taxes Payable and Other Accrued Taxes		2,921			2,370
Deferred Income Taxes		49			609
Deferred Revenue		3,487			4,646
Customer Deposits		7,582			10,606
Warrant Obligation		11,531			6,696
Other Accrued Liabilities		5,901			10,481

Total Current Liabilities		55,504			78,512
Long-Term Obligations		23,538			5,704
Other Long-Term Liabilities		1,321			3,219

Total Liabilities		80,363			87,435

Commitments and Contingencies
Minority Interest		—			1,568

Shareholders’ Equity:
Series A 8% Convertible Preferred Stock – $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		—			—
Common Stock – $.01 par value, 49,000,000 shares authorized, 34,614,261 shares outstanding at October 31, 2005 and 33,495,479 shares outstanding at April 30, 2005		346			335
Capital in Excess of Par		114,614			112,512
Accumulated Deficit		(78,787	)		(79,827	)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Cumulative Translation Adjustment, net of income tax of $0		(7,674	)		(3,506	)
Unrealized Loss on Cash Flow Hedges, net of income tax of $0 and $19		—			(50	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity		28,499			29,464

	$	108,862		$	118,467

See Accompanying Notes to

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(restated)			(restated)			(restated)			(restated)
Revenues	$	50,685		$	44,087		$	92,671		$	82,386
Cost of Sales		28,351			28,696			52,404			52,823

Gross Margin		22,334			15,391			40,267			29,563

Expenses:
Sales and Marketing		7,873			7,056			15,449			13,292
Research and Engineering		1,692			1,255			3,570			2,877
General and Administrative		7,135			4,838			13,350			9,496
Restructuring		487			—			585			—
Financial Consulting		—			—			—			623

		17,187			13,149			32,954			26,288

Operating Income		5,147			2,242			7,313			3,275
Interest Expense, Net		(437	)		(3,700	)		(1,363	)		(6,712	)
Other (Expense) Income, Net		(1,129	)		2,655			(2,914	)		2,561

Income (Loss) Before Provision for Income Taxes		3,581			1,197			3,036			(876	)
Provision for Income Taxes		(1,232	)		(531	)		(1,815	)		(1,129	)

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations		2,349			666			1,221			(2,005	)
Income (Loss) From Operations of Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax of $194, $53, $488 and $161		(184	)		(1,004	)		966			(673	)
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax of $334		(1,147	)		—			(1,147	)		—

Net Income (Loss)	$	1,018		$	(338	)	$	1,040		$	(2,678	)

Income (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations – Basic:	$	0.07		$	0.04		$	0.04		$	(0.13	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Discontinued Operations – Basic:	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.04	)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic:	$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)

Income (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations – Diluted:	$	0.07		$	0.04		$	0.03		$	(0.13	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Discontinued Operations – Diluted:	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.06	)	$	0.00		$	(0.04	)

Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Diluted:	$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)
Weighted Average Shares Used in Computing Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic		34,597			15,905			34,448			15,796
Diluted		36,137			17,073			36,065			15,796

See Accompanying Notes to

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited; in thousands)


	Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2004
	(restated)			(restated)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)	$	1,040		$	(2,678	)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		2,337			2,546
Foreign Currency Gains		(1,324	)		(1,124	)
Amortization of Debt Discount		—			528
Fair Value Adjustment on Warrants Issued		4,835			—
Non-Cash Interest Expense		—			2,625
Stock Compensation		1,304			492
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations		1,149			—
Minority Interest		82			90
Restructuring Charges		585			—
Other Non-Cash Items		(136	)		(152	)
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Receivables		(1,180	)		1,801
Inventories		(4,122	)		(1,166	)
Other Operating Assets		(261	)		(1,165	)
Customer Deposits		4,652			2,605
Accounts Payable		(288	)		1,630
Deferred Revenue		(915	)		1,321
Other Operating Liabilities		1,485			(611	)

Cash Provided by Operating Activities		9,243			6,742

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Expenditures for Property and Equipment		(880	)		(446	)
Restricted Cash		(469	)		330
Cash in Disposed Businesses		(2,930	)		—
Other		181			593

Cash (Used In) Provided By Investing Activities		(4,098	)		477

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings under Line of Credit Agreements, Net		(545	)		624
Payments on Senior Credit Agreement		(30,059	)		(25,228	)
Borrowings on Senior Credit Agreement		38,849			19,430
Payments of Long-Term Obligations		(67	)		12
Dividends Paid to Joint Venture Partner		(989	)		—
Proceeds from Exercise of Warrants		9			—

Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities		7,198			(5,162	)

Effect of Changes in Exchange Rates on Cash		(883	)		276

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		11,460			2,333
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		12,976			11,734

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	24,436		$	14,067

Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Financing Activity
Issuance of warrants to lenders	$	—		$	960

Issuance of compensatory common stock on executive incentive compensation plan	$	799		$	680

See Accompanying Notes to

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited; in thousands)

Supplemental Non-Cash Disclosure on Disposition of the Avure Business

On October 31, 2005, the Company received in exchange for the assets and liabilities of the Avure Business notes receivable totaling $9.3 million of which $1.3 million is long-term, as well as a promise to pay $5.1 million. The $5.1 million was received on November 1, 2005. As such, the disposed assets and liabilities of the Avure Business as well as the consideration received on the transaction is non-cash as of October 31, 2005 and has been excluded from the balances presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(unaudited, in thousands)


	Common Stock			Capital In Excess of Par		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
	Shares	Par Value		Capital In Excess of Par		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
						(restated)						(restated)
Balances, April 30, 2004	15,510	$	156	$	54,686	$	(58,630	)	$	(4,429	)	$	(8,217	)
Components of Comprehensive Loss:
Net Loss							(2,678	)					(2,678	)
Unrealized Gain on Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Income Tax of $100										256			256
Cumulative Translation Adjustment, Net of Income Tax of $0										717			717

Total Comprehensive Loss													(1,705	)

Issuance of Warrants					960								960
Stock Compensation	366		3		1,170								1,173

Balances, October 31, 2004	15,876	$	159	$	56,816	$	(61,308	)	$	(3,456	)	$	(7,789	)

Balances, April 30, 2005	33,495	$	335	$	112,512	$	(79,827	)	$	(3,556	)	$	29,464
Components of Comprehensive Loss:
Net Income							1,040						1,040
Unrealized Loss on Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Income Tax of $155										(398	)		(398	)
Reclassification Adjustment for Settlement of Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Income Tax of $174										448			448
Reclassification of Cumulative Translation Adjustment to Income, Net of Income Tax of $0										(1,845	)		(1,845	)
Cumulative Translation Adjustment, Net of Income Tax of $0										(2,323	)		(2,323	)

Total Comprehensive Loss													(3,078	)

Exercise of Warrants	908		9										9
Stock Compensation	211		2		2,102								2,104

Balances, October 31, 2005	34,614	$	346	$	114,614	$	(78,787	)	$	(7,674	)	$	28,499

See Accompanying Notes to

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of the management of Flow International Corporation (the “Company”), the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items and accruals necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company. These interim financial statements do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and should be read in conjunction with the April 30, 2005 consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) as filed with the SEC on January 31, 2006. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Company’s financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Operating results for the six months ended October 31, 2005 may not be indicative of future results.

2. Restatement

Prior to the filing of our original Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005 and as reported in the Company’s April 30, 2005 Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1, the Company identified errors in the Consolidated Financial Statements related to the impairment of goodwill, the valuation of anti-dilution warrants, additional costs incurred on percentage-of-completion contracts and the presentation of percentage-of-completion related balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, the computation of stock compensation expense, the allocation of the valuation allowance to deferred tax asset and liability balances, the recording of straight-line rent expense, and the classification of technical service expenses. The Company restated its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended April 30, 2005 as described in the Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1. These errors impacted the April 30, 2005 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended October 31, 2004, included in this Form 10-Q/A. The Company also determined that there was an error in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended October 31, 2004 related to its balance sheet presentation of accounts receivable and cash receipts relating to contracts accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method. The Company recorded a reduction in receivables and customer deposits of $6.2 million. The effect of this error did not impact total cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.

Subsequent to the filing of our original Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2005, and as reported in the Company’s April 30, 2005 Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2, the Company identified errors in the Consolidated Financial Statements related to the income tax provision and the recording of minority interest. The Company restated its consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended April 30, 2005 as described in the Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2. These errors impacted the April 30, 2005 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included in this Form 10-Q/A.

We have reviewed our consolidated income tax provision and have concluded that it was incorrectly stated for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004. These misstatements occurred because we incorrectly calculated the consolidated tax provision by an amount equal to the separate tax provision of Flow Autoclave. In addition, we inappropriately allocated income taxes between Continuing and Discontinued Operations.

We have also reviewed the accounting for minority interest in Flow Autoclave (included in Discontinued Operations) and determined that we had incorrectly recorded minority interest based on pre-tax income rather

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

than on after-tax income. As a result of these errors, the Provision for Income Taxes for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 was understated by $106,000 and $117,000, respectively, and for the three and six months ended October 31, 2004 by $289,000 and $181,000, respectively. Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations was misstated by the same amounts in the respective periods. (Loss) From Operations of Discontinued Operations for the three months ended October 31, 2005 was overstated by $53,000, Income from Operations of Discontinued Operations for the six months ended October 31, 2005 was understated by $64,000, and (Loss) From Operations of Discontinued Operations for the three and six months periods ended October 31, 2004 was overstated by $226,000 and $118,000, respectively.

In addition, the cumulative errors related to the minority interest at Flow Autoclave impact our calculation of the loss on the disposition of the Avure Business (see Note 5). The loss was increased from $261,000 to $1.1 million on an after tax basis.

Also, subsequent to the filing of its October 31, 2005 Form 10-Q, the Company identified errors in the classification of expenses between Cost of Sales, Sales and Marketing Expenses, Research and Engineering Expenses and General and Administrative Expenses. These errors had no impact on Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations or Discontinued Operations or Net Income (Loss), but it did impact certain pre-tax costs and expenses included in Continuing Operations, as shown in the tables below.

The effect of the restatements on the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated quarterly financial statements is as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2005			2004			2004
	(in thousands)
	(as previously reported)			(restated)			(as previously reported)			(restated)
Summary of Statement of Operations Data
Cost of Sales	$	28,552		$	28,351		$	28,897		$	28,696
Gross Margin		22,133			22,334			15,190			15,391
Sales and Marketing Expenses		7,860			7,873			7,043			7,056
Research and Engineering Expenses		1,586			1,692			1,149			1,255
General and Administrative Expenses		7,053			7,135			4,756			4,838
Provision for Income Taxes		(1,126	)		(1,232	)		(242	)		(531	)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations		2,455			2,349			955			666
Income (Loss) From Operations of Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax of $194, $194, $216 and $53		(237	)		(184	)		(1,230	)		(1,004	)
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax of $334		(261	)		(1,147	)		—			—
Net Income (Loss)	$	1,957		$	1,018		$	(275	)	$	(338	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations – Basic:	$	0.07		$	0.07		$	0.06		$	0.04
Income (Loss) Per Share From Discontinued Operations – Basic:	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic:	$	0.06		$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations – Diluted:	$	0.07		$	0.07		$	0.06		$	0.04
Income (Loss) Per Share From Discontinued Operations – Diluted:	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Diluted:	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)


	Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2005			2004			2004
	(in thousands)
	(as previously reported)			(restated)			(as previously reported)			(restated)
Summary of Statement of Operations Data
Cost of Sales		52,804			52,404			53,223			52,823
Gross Margin		39,867			40,267			29,163			29,563
Sales and Marketing Expenses		15,424			15,449			13,267			13,292
Research and Engineering Expenses		3,359			3,570			2,666			2,877
General and Administrative Expenses		13,186			13,350			9,332			9,496
Provision for Income Taxes		(1,698	)		(1,815	)		(948	)		(1,129	)
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations		1,338			1,221			(1,824	)		(2,005	)
Income (Loss) From Operations of Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax of $499, $488, $216 and $161		902			966			(791	)		(673	)
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Tax of $334		(261	)		(1,147	)		—			—
Net Income (Loss)	$	1,979		$	1,040		$	(2,615	)	$	(2,678	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations – Basic:	$	0.04		$	0.04		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.13	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Discontinued Operations – Basic:	$	0.02		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.04	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Basic:	$	0.06		$	0.03		$	(0.17	)	$	(0.17	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Continuing Operations – Diluted:	$	0.04		$	0.03		$	(0.12	)	$	(0.13	)
Income (Loss) Per Share From Discontinued Operations – Diluted:	$	0.01		$	0.00		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.04	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share – Diluted:	$	0.05		$	0.03		$	(0.17	)	$	(0.17	)

The balances as of April 30, 2005 included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect the restated amounts for the restatements described above as reported in the Company’s Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2006. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2005 has also been restated to reflect the restatements referred to above as follows:


	As of October 31, 2005
	As previously reported		Restated
	(in thousands)
Summary of Balance Sheet Data
Taxes Payable and Other Accrued Taxes	$	2,736	$	2,921
Total Current Liabilities		55,319		55,504
Total Liabilities		80,178		80,363
Accumulated Deficit		78,602		78,787
Total Shareholders’ Equity		28,684		28,499

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

3. Liquidity

On July 8, 2005, the Company executed a new $30 million, three year senior credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America N.A. and U.S. Bank N.A. This credit agreement expires July 8, 2008 and bears interest at the bank’s prime rate (6.75% at October 31, 2005) or is linked to LIBOR plus a percentage depending on the Company’s leverage ratios, at the Company’s option. The agreement sets forth specific financial covenants to be attained on a quarterly basis, which we believe, based on our financial forecasts, are achievable.

The Company’s Credit Agreement is its primary source of external funding. At October 31, 2005, the balance outstanding on the Credit Agreement was $18.5 million against a maximum available borrowing of $30 million. The available credit at October 31, 2005, net of $2.3 million in outstanding letters of credit, was $9.2 million.

We believe that our existing cash, cash from operations, and credit facilities at October 31, 2005 are adequate to fund our operations through April 30, 2006. If we fail to achieve our planned revenues, costs and working capital objectives, management believes it has the ability to curtail capital expenditures and reduce costs to levels that will be sufficient to enable us to meet our cash requirements and debt covenants through April 30, 2006. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of October 31, 2005.

4. Restructuring and Financial Consulting

In fiscal 2005, the Company completed the execution of a restructuring plan, begun in May 2003, intended to return the Company to profitability through reductions in headcount, consolidation of facilities and operations, and closure or divestiture of selected operations.

In June 2005, under a new initiative, the Company announced the closing and relocation of its Wixom, Michigan facility to its Burlington, Ontario facility. The Company terminated 25 employees and recorded associated severance benefits of $175,000 which were paid in the six month period. The Company also wrote off $24,000 of inventory with no future value. In October 2005, once the facility was vacated, the Company recorded restructuring charges related to lease termination costs of $278,000, net of expected sublease income, and wrote-off leasehold improvements of $108,000 related to this leased space.

The remaining accrued facility exit costs for all segments of $587,000, which consist of long-term lease commitments, net of expected sublease income, will be paid primarily over the next several years.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

The following table summarizes accrued restructuring activity (in thousands):


	North America Waterjet			Other International Waterjet			Other						Discontinued Operations						Consolidated
	Facility Exit Costs			Facility Exit Costs			Severance Benefits			Facility Exit Costs and Other			Severance Benefits			Facility Exit Costs			Severance Benefits			Facility Exit Costs and Other			Total
Balance, April 30, 2004	$	139		$	333		$	—		$	—		$	244		$	191		$	244		$	663		$	907
Q1 restructuring charge		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Q1 cash payments		(9	)		(4	)		—			—			(68	)		(3	)		(68	)		(16	)		(84	)

Balance, July 31, 2004		130			329			—			—			176			188			176			647			823
Q2 restructuring charge		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Q2 cash payments		(9	)		(4	)		—			—			(64	)		(3	)		(64	)		(16	)		(80	)

Balance, October 31, 2004		121			325			—			—			112			185			112			631			743
Q3 restructuring charge					—			—			—			120			119			120			119			239
Q3 cash payments		(9	)		(10	)		—			—			(56	)		(42	)		(56	)		(61	)		(117	)

Balance, January 31, 2005		112			315			—			—			176			262			176			689			865
Q4 restructuring charge					—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Q4 cash payments		(9	)		(31	)		—			—			(89	)		(20	)		(89	)		(60	)		(149	)

Balance, April 30, 2005		103			284			—			—			87			242			87			629			716
Q1 restructuring charge		—			—			74			24			—			—			74			24			98
Q1 cash payments		(9	)		(30	)		(74	)		—			(83	)		(20	)		(157	)		(59	)		(216	)

Q1 charge-offs		—			—			—			(24	)		—			—			—			(24	)		(24	)
Balance, July 31, 2005		94			254			—			—			4			222			4			570			574
Q2 restructuring charge		—			—			101			386			—			—			101			386			487
Q2 cash payments		(9	)		(30	)		(101	)		—			(4	)		(20	)		(105	)		(59	)		(164	)
Q2 charge-offs		—			—			—			(108	)		—			(202	)		—			(310	)		(310	)

Balance, October 31, 2005	$	85		$	224		$	—		$	278		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	587		$	587

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

5. Discontinued Operations

During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s plan to sell certain of its non-core businesses as a result of the strategy to divest itself of operations that are not part of its core ultra-high-pressure water pump business. On September 30, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement to divest its General Press operations, which consist of the North America Press and the International Press segments, as well as the non-ultrahigh-pressure portion of the Food segment. The ultrahigh-pressure portion of the Food segment will be shown in North America Waterjet on a go-forward basis. The sale of the business, collectively hereafter referred to as the Avure Business, was consummated on October 31, 2005. The consideration included cash of $6 million, less a working capital adjustment of $951,000, which was received on November 1, 2005, and a promissory note of $8 million payable 90 days after closing at a simple interest rate of 10% per annum. These amounts are included in the Receivable from Purchaser of Avure Business on the October 31, 2005 Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, the Company received a promissory note of $2 million payable at 3 years after closing at a simple interest rate of 6% per annum. The $2 million promissory note was reduced by 50% of the pension balance of the International Press segment as of October 31, 2005 or $687,500 and is included in Other Assets on the October 31, 2005 Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company recorded a loss of $1,087,000, net of income taxes of $334,000, on the sale.

The Company has classified the financial results of its Avure Business as discontinued operations on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the all periods presented. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 do not reflect discontinued operations treatment for the Avure Business as the Company has elected not to reclassify its balance sheets or cash flows for this discontinued operation.

Summarized financial information for the discontinued operations is set forth below (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(restated)			(restated)			(restated)			(restated)
Net sales	$	8,344		$	11,380		$	16,087		$	22,063
Income (Loss) before income taxes		10			(951	)		1,454			(512	)
Income tax provision		(194	)		(53	)		(488	)		(161	)
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations		(184	)		(1,004	)		966			(673	)

6. Net Income (Loss) Per Share and Stock-Based Compensation

Basic net income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share represents net income (loss) available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding including the potentially dilutive impact of stock options and warrants, where appropriate. Potential common share equivalents of stock options and warrants are computed by the treasury stock method and are included in the denominator for computation of earnings per share if such equivalents are dilutive.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
	(restated)		(restated)		(restated)		(restated)
Numerator:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	2,349	$	666	$	1,221	$	(2,005	)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share—weighted average shares		34,597		15,905		34,448		15,796
Dilutive potential common shares from employee stock options		102		—		93		—
Dilutive potential common shares from warrants		1,438		1,168		1,524		—

Denominator for diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share—weighted average shares and assumed conversions		36,137		17,073		36,065		15,796

Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$	0.07	$	0.04	$	0.04	$	(0.13	)
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$	0.07	$	0.04	$	0.03	$	(0.13	)

The dilutive potential common shares from employee stock options exclude 1,547,122 and 1,567,122 options which were out of the money for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, respectively and 2,074,769 for the three months ended October 31, 2004. In addition, 2,074,769 options and the effect of all warrants (a total of 1,160,000 shares as of October 31, 2004) have been excluded from the diluted weighted average share denominator for the six months ended October 31, 2004, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

The Company engaged an independent third party in a Consulting Agreement effective March 1, 2003 to provide executive coaching and organizational services. In partial consideration for such services, the Company issued 20,608 unregistered shares of common stock, valued at $55,000 which was expensed during the six months ended October 31, 2004.

On July 28, 2004, in connection with the execution of amendments to its senior credit agreement, the Company issued to the senior lenders 150,000 detachable warrants to purchase common stock at $.01 per share as a fee. The 150,000 warrants were valued at $480,000 and were amortized to interest expense during the period from August 1, 2004 through July 31, 2005 which was the maturity date of the amended senior credit agreement. Also, in connection with the July 28, 2004 amendment of its subordinated debt agreement, the Company issued to the subordinated lender 150,000 detachable warrants to purchase common stock at $.01 per share as a fee. All of these warrants were fully vested. The 150,000 warrants were valued at $480,000 and were deferred to debt issue costs to be amortized to interest expense during the period from August 1, 2004 through the original term of the subordinated debt. In conjunction with the payoff of the subordinated debt on April 28, 2005, the Company recorded charges of $2.0 million to expense the remaining unamortized fees including the unamortized costs related to these warrants. The issuance of shares and warrants was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 because these were not transactions involving a public offering.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“FAS 123”),

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

“Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” to stock-based employee compensation. Because the Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets there are no tax effects related to the stock-based compensation items below.


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(restated)			(restated)			(restated)			(restated)
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	1,018		$	(338	)	$	1,040		$	(2,678	)
Add: Employee stock-based compensation under APB 25 included in net income (loss), net of related tax effects		592			129			1,304			438
Deduct: Total employee stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax related effects		(605	)		(149	)		(1,331	)		(483	)

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	1,005		$	(358	)	$	1,013		$	(2,723	)

Net income (loss) per share:
As reported—basic and diluted	$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)
Pro forma—basic and diluted	$	0.03		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	(0.17	)

To determine compensation expense under FAS 123, the Company used the following assumptions:


	Fiscal 2006		Fiscal 2005
Risk-free interest rates	4.01	%	4.34	%
Expected lives	Five years		Six years
Expected dividend yields	0	%	0	%
Expected volatility	62.8	%	62.0	%

During the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded total employee non-cash compensation expense related to various compensatory arrangements which provide common stock or restricted stock units, rather than options, to the Board of Directors and executive management. The table below presents the expense components related to the various common stock arrangements for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004. Please refer to the Company’s Second Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a further discussion of compensatory arrangements.


	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Accrual for annual compensatory stock award to Board members	$	60	$	60	$	120	$	120
Executive employment and retention contracts		532		69		1,184		318

	$	592	$	129	$	1,304	$	438

7. Segment Information

Commensurate with the disposition of the Avure Business in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company classified its Avure Business as a discontinued operation. The Avure Business was reported as three separate reportable segments, which were Food, North America Press and International Press. See Note 5 for additional information about the Company’s discontinued operations.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

The Company retains four reportable segments after the sale of Avure Business. These segments, North America Waterjet, Asia Waterjet, Other International Waterjet and Other (together known as Waterjet), utilize the Company’s released pressure technology. The Waterjet operation includes cutting and cleaning operations, which are focused on providing total solutions for the aerospace, automotive, job shop, surface preparation and paper industries. Segment operating results are measured by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer based on operating income (loss). The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in the Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s April 30, 2005 Amended Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K/A.

A summary of operations by reportable segment is as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,					Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005		2004			2005		2004
	(in thousands)
Sales
North America Waterjet	$	28,644	$	20,663		$	51,571	$	36,563
Asia Waterjet		7,468		6,453			13,236		12,804
Other International Waterjet		8,789		8,396			17,242		15,532
Other*		5,784		8,575			10,622		17,487

	$	50,685	$	44,087		$	92,671	$	82,386

Operating Income (Loss) (restated)
North America Waterjet	$	2,107	$	1,220		$	2,534	$	774
Asia Waterjet		2,016		1,579			3,361		3,243
Other International Waterjet		344		(1	)		627		(398	)
Other*		528		(702	)		599		(601	)
Eliminations		152		146			192		257

	$	5,147	$	2,242		$	7,313	$	3,275

*	The Other segment is comprised of divisions which do not make primary use of the Company’s ultrahigh-pressure water pump technology. These divisions provide automation and robotic system solutions to the automotive market.

8. Restricted Cash

The Company maintains amounts which are restricted in a separate bank account to provide customer performance guarantees as well as vendor guarantees. At October 31, 2005 and April 30, 2005, the Company had $955,000 and $526,000 of cash pledged on such guarantees of which $921,000 and $469,000 have restrictions which will lift within the next twelve months, respectively. The remaining restricted cash balances have been reported in Other Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

9. Receivables

Receivables consist of the following:


	October 31, 2005			April 30, 2005
				(restated)
	(in thousands)
Trade Accounts Receivable	$	28,281		$	37,157
Unbilled Revenues		3,402			5,027

		31,683			42,184
Less Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		(3,533	)		(3,859	)

	$	28,150		$	38,325

Receivables at April 30, 2005 included $11.8 million related to the Avure Business.

10. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:


	October 31, 2005			April 30, 2005
	(in thousands)
Raw Materials and Parts	$	11,008		$	15,500
Work in Process		2,330			4,799
Finished Goods		7,673			6,852

		21,011			27,151
Less Provision for Slow-Moving and Obsolete Inventories		(1,609	)		(2,933	)

	$	19,402		$	24,218

Inventories at April 30, 2005 include $6.2 million related to the Avure Business.

11. Income Taxes

For the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, the tax provision consists of current expense related to operations in foreign jurisdictions which are profitable and without loss carryforwards. In addition, certain operations in jurisdictions (principally Germany and the US) reported net operating losses for which no benefit was recognized as it is more likely than not that such benefit will not be realized.

Due to a history of losses and uncertainty of future earnings, the Company continues to provide a full valuation allowance against its net operating losses and other net deferred tax assets, arising in all tax jurisdictions because the realization of such assets is not more likely than not. The domestic net operating losses can be carried forward 20 years to offset domestic profits in future periods and expire from fiscal 2022 through fiscal 2024 and other foreign net operating losses do not have an expiration date.

In fiscal 2004, the Company determined it was no longer able to permanently defer foreign earnings and recorded a $1.7 million liability for withholding taxes payable on future repatriation of foreign earnings. The

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

Company has continued to record liabilities for withholding taxes on earnings of these foreign operations. During the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, the Company repatriated $0 million and $1.4 million from certain foreign subsidiaries and plans to continue to repatriate additional earnings in the future.

12. Notes Payable and Long-Term Obligations


	October 31, 2005			April 30, 2005
Long Term Obligations:
Senior Credit Agreement	$	18,486		$	9,695
Term Loans Payable		5,478			5,921

		23,964			15,616
Less Current Portion		(426	)		(9,912	)

	$	23,538		$	5,704

Notes Payable	$	1,011		$	3,531

On July 8, 2005, the Company signed the Credit Agreement. The Company expensed $489,000 of fees during the six months ended October 31, 2005 related to the prior credit agreement. The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $30 million with a maturity date of July 8, 2008 and is collateralized by a general lien on all of the Company’s assets. Interest rates under the Agreement are at LIBOR plus a percentage depending on leverage ratios or at the Bank of America’s prime rate in effect from time to time, at the Company’s option. LIBOR and the prime rate at October 31, 2005 were 4.09% and 6.75%, respectively. The rate in effect on the balance outstanding at October 31, 2005 was 6.75%. The Credit Agreement requires compliance with funded debt, tangible net worth and liquidity ratios. The Company also pays an annual letter of credit fee equal to 2.5% of the amount drawn under each outstanding letter of credit. The annual letter of credit fee is payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, the Credit Agreement, similar to prior agreements, includes a subjective acceleration clause which permits the lenders to demand payment in the event of a material adverse change. The prior credit agreement, however, included a process whereby the Company’s current excess cash receipts directly reduce the outstanding senior credit facility balance. Therefore, at April 30, 2005, the balance outstanding was classified as a current liability. The Credit Agreement does not include this provision, therefore, the outstanding balance is classified in Long-Term Obligations.

The Company makes use of its credit facility to fund its operations during the course of the year. During the six months ended October 31, 2005, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $38.8 million on the prior and current credit facility while repaying $30.1 million. As of October 31, 2005, the Company had $9.2 million of domestic unused line of credit, net of $2.3 million in outstanding letters of credit and $18.5 million in outstanding borrowings.

The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of October 31, 2005 and for the quarter then ended.

The Company has five unsecured credit facilities in Taiwan with a commitment totaling 268 million New Taiwanese Dollars (US$8.0 million at October 31, 2005), bearing interest at rates ranging from 1.8% to 2.845% per annum. The credit facilities have maturities between 12 and 36 months and can be extended for like periods, as needed, at the bank’s option. At October 31, 2005, the balance outstanding under these credit facilities amounts to US$2.2 million, $1.0 million of which is shown under Notes Payable while the remaining $1.2 million is classified under Term Loans Payable.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

The Company has also obtained a seven-year collateralized long-term loan, expiring in 2011, in the amount of 145 million New Taiwanese Dollars (US$4.3 million at October 31, 2005) bearing interest at an annual rate of 2.83%. The loan is collateralized by the Company’s recently completed manufacturing facility in Taiwan. In June 2004, the Company borrowed $4.1 million against this facility and repatriated $3.5 million to the U.S. to reduce amounts outstanding under the senior credit facility. The balance of $4.1 million at October 31, 2005 is included in Term Loans Payable.

As a result of the disposition of the Avure Business as described in Note 5, the purchaser assumed credit facility in Sweden totaling 25 million Swedish Krona (US$3.2 million at October 31, 2005), which was collateralized by trade receivables and inventories of the Company’s former Swedish subsidiary.

13. Warranty Obligations

The Company’s estimated obligations for warranty are accrued concurrently with the revenue recognized. The Company makes provisions for its warranty obligations based upon historical costs incurred for such obligations adjusted, as necessary, for current conditions and factors. Due to the significant uncertainties and judgments involved in estimating the Company’s warranty obligations, including changing product designs and specifications, the ultimate amount incurred for warranty costs could change in the near term from the current estimate.

The following table shows the fiscal 2006 year-to-date activity for the Company’s warranty obligations:


	(in thousands)
Accrued warranty balance as of April 30, 2005	$	1,710
Accruals for warranties		783
Adjustment for Avure Business – see Note 5		(326	)
Warranty costs incurred		(949	)

Accrued warranty balance as of October 31, 2005	$	1,218

14. Other Income (Expense), Net

On March 21, 2005, in a Private Investment in Public Equity Transaction (“PIPE Transaction”), the Company sold 17,473,116 equity units at $3.72 per unit for gross proceeds of $65 million, and net proceeds of more than $59 million. A unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to buy 1/10^th of a share of common stock. Ten warrants give the holder the right to purchase one share of common stock for $4.07.

Under terms of the PIPE Transaction, the Company was required to file an initial Form S-1 registration of the shares issued and issuable in the PIPE Transaction on or before May 20, 2005 and was required to cause the Form S-1 to become effective on or before September 17, 2005. The Company subsequently amended the Registration Rights Agreement to grant an extension until March 10, 2006 for the effective date of the registration of the shares and warrants issued in the PIPE Transaction. The Company is subject to liquidated damages of $650,000 per month, if it fails to meet the March 10, 2006 deadline.

Under EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” (EITF 00-19”), the fair value of the warrants issued under the PIPE Transaction have been reported initially as a liability due to the requirement to net-cash settle the transaction until the Company’s Form S-1 is declared effective. The reason for this treatment is that there are cash payment penalties of 1% of the

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

gross proceeds per month ($650,000) should this Form S-1 not be declared effective prior to December 31, 2005. Upon effectiveness of the Form S-1, these amounts will be reclassified into Capital in Excess of Par in the Equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The warrants are considered a derivative financial instrument and are being marked to fair value quarterly until the Form S-1 is declared effective. The changes in fair value of the warrants are recorded to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as Other Income (Expense), net. The Company reported $4.2 million and $4.8 million of expense in the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, respectively, associated with the change in the fair value of the warrants. There was no fair value adjustment in any other periods presented.

The Company’s subsidiaries have adopted the local currency of the country in which they operate as the functional currency. All assets and liabilities of these foreign subsidiaries are translated at year-end rates. Income and expense accounts of the foreign subsidiaries are translated at the average rates in effect during the year. Assets and liabilities (including inter-company accounts that are transactional in nature) of the Company which are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity are translated based on current exchange rates and gains or losses are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The following table shows the detail of Other (Expense) Income, net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations:


	Three Months Ended October 31,					Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2004		2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Realized Foreign Exchange (Losses) Gains, Net	$	(237	)	$	726	$	(220	)	$	1,339
Unrealized Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses), Net		631			1,927		(458	)		1,251
Fair Value Adjustment on Warrants Issued		(4,157	)		—		(4,835	)		—
Gain on Barton Sale (Note 17)		2,500			—		2,500			—
Other		134			2		99			(29	)

	$	(1,129	)	$	2,655	$	(2,914	)	$	2,561

15. Commitments and Contingencies

At any time, the Company may be involved in certain legal proceedings in addition to the Omax matter described below. As of October 31, 2005, the Company has accrued its estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these claims. This estimate has been developed in consultation with legal counsel and is based upon an analysis of potential outcomes, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. The Company does not believe these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. However, it is possible that future results of operations or cash flows for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions, or the effectiveness of its strategies, related to these proceedings.

On November 18, 2004, Omax Corporation (“Omax”) filed suit against the Company alleging that the Company’s products infringe on Omax’s patents. The suit also seeks to have a specific patent held by the Company declared invalid. The Company asserts that it does not infringe Omax’s patents and Omax’s patents are invalid and unenforceable. In its counterclaim, the Company seeks damages from Omax for violation of antitrust laws and injunctive relief and damages for infringement of the Company’s patent. The trial date has been set for September 2006. Although the Omax suit seeks damages of over $100 million, the Company believes Omax’s

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

claims are without merit and intends not only to contest Omax’s allegations of infringement but also to vigorously pursue its claims with regard to its own patent. Accordingly, the Company has not provided any loss contingency accrual related to the Omax lawsuit as of October 31, 2005. The Company will incur legal expenses as part of this lawsuit and will expense them as incurred. While an exact amount of legal fees is not known at this time, the total fees are expected to be more than $1 million over the next year to two years.

16. New Accounting Pronouncements

During October 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF with respect to EITF Issue No. 04-10, Determining Whether to Aggregate Operating Segments That Do Not Meet the Quantitative Thresholds (EITF 04-10), which clarifies the guidance in paragraph 19 of FAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (FAS No. 131). According to EITF 04-10, operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds can be aggregated under paragraph 19 only if aggregation is consistent with the objective and basic principle of FAS No. 131, the segments have similar economic characteristics, and the segments share a majority of the aggregation criteria listed in items (a)-(e) in paragraph 17 of FAS No. 131. The FASB staff is currently working on a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide guidance in determining whether two or more operating segments have similar economic characteristics. The effective date of EITF 04-10 has been delayed in order to coincide with the effective date of the anticipated FSP, with early application is permitted. The adoption of EITF 04-10 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs—an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This statement clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage, requiring these items be recognized as current-period charges. In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of this statement are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and will become effective for the Company beginning in May 2006. The full impact that the adoption of this statement will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations has not yet been determined.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (FAS 153), which eliminates the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. FAS 153 will be effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted FAS 153 during the three months ended October 31, 2005 without a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004).” This statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for the company’s equity instruments or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the company’s equity securities or may be settled by the issuance of these securities. SFAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation using APB 25 and generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value method. The provisions of this statement are effective for financial statements issued for the first interim period following the Company’s fiscal year that begins on or after June 15, 2005 and will become effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of the fiscal 2007 year. The Company has not yet determined which transition method it will use to adopt SFAS 123R. The full impact that the adoption of this statement will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations will be determined by share-based payments granted in future periods.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2005

(unaudited)

In March 2005, the FASB also issued FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47). FIN 47 clarifies that an entity must record a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 47 to have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

17. Other Significant Event

On August 26, 2005, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Barton Mines Company (“Barton”) to give Barton exclusive rights to sell abrasive to the Company’s customers for $2.5 million in cash at closing, future annual payments of up to $250,000 for the next three years based on achievement of system sales targets and royalty payments for systems sold over the next 10 years. The Company recorded the $2.5 million proceeds in Other Income (Expense), Net for the three months ended October 31, 2005.

18. Reclassifications

Certain fiscal 2005 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2006 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net loss, shareholders’ deficit or cash flows as previously reported.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT:

Statements made in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements typically are identified by the use of such terms as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “potential,” “continue” or similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. We caution investors that forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current expectations about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. You should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to the following: the special risk factors and uncertainties set forth below; our belief that the financial covenants in our credit facilities are achievable based on current financial forecasts; our belief that the existing cash and credit facilities at October 31, 2005 are adequate to fund our operations through April 30, 2006 and that if the Company fails to achieve its planned revenues, costs and working capital objectives, management has the ability to curtail capital expenditures and reduce costs to levels that will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its cash requirements and debt covenants through April 30, 2006; the belief that timing issues associated with payment of accounts receivable will not impact our short term liquidity requirements; our expectations that the benefits from our restructuring activities should continue for the remainder of fiscal 2006 and that these changes should help us to achieve our forecasts; that our ability to curtail capital expenditures, control costs and expenses; that our waterjets are experiencing growing acceptance in the marketplace for their flexibility and superior machine performance; that future consumables sales should be positively impacted by the increased number of operating systems and by sales of the Company’s proprietary productivity enhancing kits, as well as the enhanced flexibility of parts purchased via the Internet at Flowparts.com; relations with and performance of suppliers; our ability to successfully develop and sell products in the competitive markets that we serve; access to capital; maintaining satisfactory relationships with our lending partners; political and trade relations; the overall level of consumer spending on capital equipment; global economic conditions and additional threatened terrorist attacks and responses thereto, including war; the belief that Omax’s claims are without merit; our intent to contest Omax’s allegations; the estimated cost of contesting the Omax suit. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect our financial results is set forth below and in our Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or developments, except as required by federal securities laws.

All references to fiscal years are references to our fiscal year end of April 30.

As described in the Explanatory Note above and in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we have restated our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q/A. Amounts in this section have been updated to reflect these restatements.

Risks and Uncertainties

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially because of risks and uncertainties such as those listed below and elsewhere in this report, which, among others, should be considered in evaluating our financial outlook.

We have incurred losses in recent years and we may be unable to achieve profitability.

While we had income of $1.0 million for the six months ended October 31, 2005, our losses from continuing operations for each of the fiscal years ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $12.2 million, $10.7 million and $44.0 million, respectively. We believe our recently completed restructuring and related cost-cutting initiatives will reduce overall spending. However, if we are unable to contain expenses or if our restructuring efforts fail to adequately reduce costs, or if our sales are less than we project, we may incur losses in future periods. Economic weakness in our served markets may adversely affect our ability to meet our sales projections.

Economic weakness in our served markets may adversely affect our financial results.

The products we sell are capital goods with individual system prices ranging from $150,000 to several million dollars. Many of our customers depend on long term financing from a financial institution to purchase our equipment. Economic weakness in the capital goods market and or a credit tightening by the banking industry would reduce our sales and accordingly affect our financial results.

If we fail to comply with our financing arrangements, our ability to continue operations would be impaired.

Under the Current Senior Credit Agreement (entered into on July 8, 2005), we are operating under a credit agreement with our senior lenders which expires July 8, 2008 and sets forth specific financial covenants to be attained on a quarterly basis. In addition, our agreement includes subjective acceleration clauses which permit the lenders to demand payment on the determination of a material adverse change in the business. In the event of default, the senior lenders may limit our access to borrow funds as needed. Our ability to continue operating is dependent on the senior lenders’ willingness to grant access to funds. If we are unable to obtain the necessary funds, our ability to continue operations would be seriously impaired unless we are able to obtain alternative financing from another source. In the event of a default, obtaining alternative financing may be difficult and may be at less favorable terms. We may be unable to achieve our projected operating results and maintain compliance with the loan covenants which would trigger an event of default with our Lenders. In an event of default, the lenders would be in the position to exercise default remedies which include applying a default interest rate and acceleration of payment schedules for our outstanding debt. Our Lenders may pursue any number of plans to reduce the outstanding debt, including, in certain circumstances, a liquidation of some or all of our assets.

If our Form S-1 registration statement which contains fiscal 2005 results, does not become effective by March 10, 2006 or becomes ineffective for more than 40 days, after having gone effective, we may be subject to significant financial penalties.

Under terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, as part of a Private Investment in Public Equity transaction (“PIPE Transaction”), we were required to have the Form S-1, which registers the shares sold in the PIPE Transaction and the related warrants, become effective no later that September 17, 2005. We have amended the Registration Rights Agreement to grant an extension until March 10, 2006 for the effective date of the registration of the shares and warrants issued in the PIPE Transaction. In addition, the registration statement cannot become ineffective for more than 40 days (not necessarily consecutive). If either of these events occur, then we will be subject to a cash penalty of up to $650,000 per month for each month the registration statement is not effective. Certain factors that could cause the registration statement to become or remain ineffective are not within our control.

If we are unable to retain the current members of our senior management team and other key personnel, our future success may be negatively impacted.

We have lost key management personnel and we may lose key management personnel in the future and encounter difficulties replacing these positions. We may have to incur greater costs to attract replacement personnel.

Our inability to protect our intellectual property rights, or our possible infringement on the proprietary rights of others, and related litigation could be time consuming and costly.

We defend our intellectual property rights because unauthorized copying and sale of our proprietary equipment and consumables represents a loss of revenue to us. From time to time we also receive notices from others claiming we infringe their intellectual property rights. The number of these claims may grow in the future, and responding to these claims may require us to stop selling or to redesign affected products, or to pay damages. On November 18, 2004, Omax Corporation (“Omax”) filed suit against us alleging that our products infringe on Omax’s patents. The suit also seeks to have a specific patent we hold declared invalid. Although the suit seeks damages of over $100 million, we believe Omax’s claims are without merit and we intend not only to contest Omax’s allegations of infringement but also to vigorously pursue our claims against Omax with regard to our own patent. See Note 15 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of contingencies.

Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results may cause our stock price to decline and limit our shareholders’ ability to sell our common stock in the public market.

In the past, our operating results have fluctuated significantly from quarter to quarter and we expect them to continue to do so in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Our operating results may in some future quarter fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In this event, the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly. In addition to the risks disclosed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, factors outside of our control that have caused our quarterly operating results to fluctuate in the past and that may affect us in the future include:

•

fluctuations in general economic conditions;

•

demand for UHP pumps and UHP water management systems generally;

•

fluctuations in the capital budgets of customers; and

•

development of superior products and services by our competitors.

In addition, factors within our control, such as our ability to deliver equipment in a timely fashion, have caused our operating results to fluctuate in the past and may affect us similarly in the future.

The factors listed above may affect both our quarter-to-quarter operating results as well as our long-term success. Given the fluctuations in our operating results, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance or to determine any trend in our performance. Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results could cause the market price of and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit your ability to sell our common stock on the public market.

We do business in industries that are cyclical, which may result in weakness in demand for our products.

Our products are sold in many industries, including machine tool, automotive and aerospace, that are highly cyclical. The machine tool industry, in particular from 1998 through 2003, experienced a significant decline in global demand. Cyclical weaknesses in the industries that we serve could lead to a reduced demand for our products.

We may be affected by rising costs or lack of availability of materials, which could negatively impact our operations.

We have experienced and may continue to experience significant increases in the costs of materials we use in the manufacture of our products, such as steel, and we may not be able to either achieve corresponding increases in the prices of our products or reduce manufacturing costs to offset these increases, or if we do increase prices, we may experience lower sales. Any of the foregoing may adversely affect our financial results.

If we cannot develop technological improvements to our products through continued research and engineering, our financial results may be adversely affected.

In order to maintain our position in the market, we need to continue to invest in research and engineering to improve our products and technologies and introduce new products and technologies. If we are unable to make such investment, if our research and development does not lead to new and/or improved products or technologies, or if we experience delays in the development or acceptance of new and/or improved products, our financial results will be adversely affected.

We have received notice of material weaknesses in internal controls. Consequently, there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected in the current or any future period. Additionally we may conclude that our system of internal controls under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley is not effective.

In December 2004, in connection with the restatement of our fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 financial statements, and in November 2005 and January 2006, in connection with the restatement of our fiscal 2005, and 2004 and 2003 financial statements, our former independent registered public accounting firm reported to management and to the Audit Committee material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management agrees with and has responded to the Audit Committee with our plans to remediate the material weaknesses communicated by our former independent registered public accounting firm. Remediation of these material weaknesses is ongoing.

The material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting are as follows:

•

The Company did not maintain effective controls over the financial reporting process due to an insufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with its financial reporting requirements and the complexity of the Company’s operations and transactions. Specifically, the Company incorrectly applied generally accepted accounting principles for (i) the impairment of goodwill, (ii) the classification of deferred tax balances, (iii) the valuation of anti-dilution warrants, (iv) the accrual of costs on contracts accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, (v) leases with rent escalation clauses, (vi) the recording of minority interest, and (viii) the computation of the provision for income taxes, affecting receivables, deferred income taxes, prepaid expenses, goodwill, other accrued liabilities, other long-term liabilities and taxes payable, customer deposits, minority interest, capital in excess of par, accumulated deficit, cost of sales, general and administrative expenses, impairment charge, interest expense and other income, net and the provision for income taxes. This material weakness contributed to the material weakness discussed below.

•

The Company did not maintain effective controls to ensure there is adequate (i) analysis, documentation, reconciliation and review of accounting records, and supporting data, and (ii) monitoring and oversight of the work performed by accounting and financial reporting personnel to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, the Company did not have effective controls designed and in place over the consolidation of the financial statements of subsidiaries and the computation of minority interest, the reconciliation of inter-company accounts, the valuation of anti-dilution warrants, the accrual of costs on contracts and balance sheet presentation of accounts receivable and cash receipts relating to contracts accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, the classification of technical service expenses, the accounting for performance based equity awards and the computation of income tax provisions, affecting receivables, prepaid expenses, other accrued liabilities, taxes payable, customer deposits, capital in excess of par, minority interest, accumulated deficit, cost of sales, marketing expense, research and engineering, general and administrative expense, interest expense, other income, net, and the provision for income taxes.

An in-depth review of the remediation process to date, as well as the steps remaining, can be found in Item 4 of Part I of this Form 10-Q.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to assess the design and effectiveness of our internal control systems effective April 30, 2006. Our independent registered public accounting firm is required to render an attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting. We must complete the documentation, evaluation and remediation of our systems of internal control. The costs associated with such compliance are likely to be substantial and will negatively impact our financial results. In addition, there is no assurance that we will be able to conclude that our systems are appropriately designed or effective, which could result in a material misstatement going undetected in the financial statements and which may in turn lead to a decline in the stock price.

As a result of accounting regulations, which become applicable to us on May 1, 2006, requiring companies to expense stock options, our expenses will increase and our stock price may decline.

A number of publicly traded companies have recently announced that they will begin expensing stock option grants to employees. In addition, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has adopted rule changes with an effective date as of the beginning of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 requiring expensing the fair value of stock options. Currently we include such expenses on a pro forma basis in the notes to our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, but do not include stock option expense for the fair value of employee options in our reported financial statements. This change in accounting standards will require us to expense stock options, and as a result, our reported expenses are expected to increase; however, the amount of the increase has not been determined.

Market risk exists in our operations from potential adverse changes in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar in our foreign operations.

A significant portion of our sales take place outside of the United States, and we transact business in various foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen, and the New Taiwan dollar. In addition, our foreign divisions may have customer receivables and vendor obligations in currencies other than their local currency which exposes us to near-term and longer term currency fluctuation risks. The assets and liabilities of our foreign operations, with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar, are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Based on our results for the quarter ended October 31, 2005 for our foreign subsidiaries, and based on the net position of foreign assets less liabilities, a near-term 10% appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar in all currencies we operate could impact operating income on an annualized basis by $1.4 million and other income (expense) by $740,000. Our financial position and cash flows could be similarly impacted.

Current year foreign sales have benefited from a weak U.S. dollar. If the dollar were to strengthen against certain foreign currencies, such as the euro and yen, our margins may be negatively affected.

A significant portion of our products sold outside the United States are manufactured domestically. The weaker U.S. dollar, relative to the local currency of many of the countries we sell into, has made our products less expensive, on a relative basis, when compared to locally manufactured products and products manufactured in certain other countries. As the U.S. dollar gains in value relative to these foreign currencies, our products will increase in cost to the customer relative to locally produced product and products manufactured in certain other countries, which could negatively impact sales.

Sales of registered stock could exert downward pressure on the market price of our stock and could encourage short selling that could exert further downward pressure

To the extent that shareholders who acquired shares of our common stock (either directly or through the exercise of warrants, which are exercisable at $0.01 per share) in the PIPE Transaction or in connection with certain loans (the “Selling Shareholders”) acquired their shares at prices less than the then current trading price of our common stock, they may have an incentive to immediately resell material amounts of such shares in the market which may, in turn, cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. Significant downward pressure on our stock price caused by the sale of stock registered in an offering could encourage short sales by the Selling Shareholders (and in particular short sales by warrant holders in anticipation of exercising their warrants) or third parties that would place further downward pressure on our stock price. In an ordinary or “uncovered” short sale, a seller causes his or her executing broker to borrow the shares to be delivered at the completion of the sale from another broker, subject to an agreement to return them upon request, thereby avoiding the need to deliver any shares actually owned by the seller stockholder on the settlement date for the sale. Since the seller does not own the shares that are sold, the seller must subsequently purchase an equivalent number of shares in the market to complete or “cover” the transaction. The seller stockholder will realize a profit if the market price of the shares declines after the time of the short sale, but will incur a loss if the market price rises and he or she is forced to buy the replacement shares at a higher price. Accordingly, a declining trend in the market price of our common stock may stimulate short sales.

Under the terms of certain outstanding warrants, we could be required to make antidilution adjustments

Certain of the Selling Shareholders (as defined above) hold warrants to purchase our common stock at a price of $.01 per share. Such warrants were originally issued to our lenders (“Lender Warrants”). While such Lender Warrants are outstanding customary anti-dilution adjustments will be made in the Lender Warrants, if we issue common stock (other than pursuant to the exercise of warrants or other rights or convertible securities) at a price less than then current market price, or we issue warrants or other rights or convertible securities to purchase or acquire common stock exercisable or convertible, at a price less than then current market price when the warrants, rights or convertible securities are issued. The customary anti-dilution adjustments will be made in the purchase price of the common stock under the Lender Warrants (multiplying the exercise price before the issuance by a fraction in which the numerator is the number of shares outstanding prior to the issuance and the denominator is the number of shares outstanding after the issuance) and the number of shares of common stock issuable in exercise of the Lender Warrants (multiplying the current number of shares subject to the warrants by a fraction in which the numerator is the purchase price before the issuance and the denominator is the purchase price after the issuance). The exercise of any currently outstanding warrants will not trigger any adjustments in the Lender Warrants because adjustments made to the extent required on the issuance of such warrants. We have no plans to issue any common stock, or warrants to purchase common stock exercisable, at a price below the then current market price, except to the extent we may be required to issue Common Stock under currently outstanding warrants.

Changes in Financial Condition

We generated $9.2 million of cash from operating activities during the six months ended October 31, 2005 compared to $6.7 million of cash generated for the six months ended October 31, 2004. The current period’s operating cash flow includes $2.5 million of cash received related to the Purchase Agreement with Barton referred to earlier. Customer deposits increased $4.7 million further contributing to the cash flow from operations. These deposits provide the funding for the manufacturing of our systems and primarily relate to large aerospace contracts that we have been awarded. The revenue associated with these deposits is expected to be recognized in the next twelve months. Offsetting these inflow is a $1.2 million increase in Receivables, net from progress made on percentage-of-completion projects during the six months ended October 31, 2005. Trade receivables accounted for cash generation of $1.8 million in the year ago comparable period. Additionally, increases in inventory of $4.1 million during the six months ended October 31, 2005 offset the cash generated by the Barton transaction and customer deposits. These increases were the result of additional inventory purchases

in our core business to meet upcoming demand in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as well as inventory changes in the Avure business prior to the disposition.

Net receivables are comprised of trade accounts and unbilled revenues. At October 31, 2005, the net receivables balance decreased $10.2 million or 27% from April 30, 2005. The decrease in net receivables stemmed from the reduction in trade receivables of $8.9 million or 24% from $37.2 million at April 30, 2005 to $28.3 million at October 31, 2005 on sale of the Avure Business which reduced trade receivables by $7.5 million and on collection of standard waterjet system sales for the six months ended October 31, 2005. Receivables days sales outstanding (including unbilled revenues and excluding the Avure business for the comparative periods) increased to 55 days at October 31, 2005 from 49 as of April 30, 2005. This decrease in Trade Receivables was compounded by a reduction in unbilled revenues from $5.0 million at April 30, 2005 to $3.4 million at October 31, 2005, a $1.6 million or 32% decrease. The Avure Business accounted for $4.6 million of the decrease which was offset by an increase in the percentage complete on our aerospace contracts as well as a higher number of automation contracts being worked on. Our unbilled receivables relate to equipment and systems sales accounted for on a percentage of completion basis. Unbilled revenues fluctuate due to the scheduling of production and achievement of certain billing milestones. In general, receivables can be negatively affected by the traditionally longer payment cycle outside the United States and the timing of billings and payments on large special system orders. We do not believe these timing issues will present a material adverse impact on our short-term liquidity requirements. Because of the lead-time to build and deliver such equipment, ultimate collection of such accounts can be subject to changing customer business and economic conditions.

Inventories, net at October 31, 2005 decreased $4.8 million or 20% from April 30, 2005 driven by the sale of the Avure Business which accounted for $6.2 million. This was offset by an increase in Waterjet inventory of $1.3 million primarily related to some equipment for our aerospace contracts which we anticipate shipping in our fourth fiscal quarter of 2006.

Customer deposits were $7.6 million at October 31, 2005, versus the $10.6 million balance at April 30, 2005. The disposition of the Avure Business accounted for a decrease of $3.1 million which was offset by the receipt of milestone advances due under the significant aerospace contracts which we were awarded in fiscal 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Approximately $20.3 million of our cash and restricted cash is held by divisions outside the United States. The repatriation of offshore cash balances from certain divisions will trigger tax liabilities. In fiscal 2004, we recorded a $1.9 million liability for withholding taxes on future repatriation of historical foreign earnings. In fiscal 2005, we repatriated $4.8 million from certain foreign subsidiaries. During the six months ended October 31, 2005, we repatriated $1.4 million from a foreign subsidiary and we plan to continue repatriating additional funds in the future.

On March 21, 2005, in a Private Investment in Public Equity Transaction (“PIPE Transaction”), we sold 17,473,116 equity units at $3.72 per unit for gross proceeds of $65 million, and net proceeds of more than $59 million. A unit consists of one share of our common stock and one warrant to buy 1/10^th of a share of our common stock. Ten warrants give the holder the right to purchase one share of common stock for $4.07. If all the warrant holders opted to exercise their warrants, we would receive $7.1 million in cash proceeds.

Because the market price of the common stock was greater than $3.70, we issued approximately 304,000 anti-dilution warrants to current warrant holders prior to the PIPE Transaction which have a Black-Scholes value of approximately $1.7 million. Approximately $1.5 million of this amount relates to warrants issued under subordinated debt agreements and $0.2 million relates to warrants issued under senior debt agreements. Proceeds of the PIPE were used to pay down existing debt, including all of the subordinated debt.

Under terms of the PIPE Transaction, we were required to file an initial Form S-1 registration of the shares issued and issuable in the PIPE Transaction on or before May 20, 2005 and were required to cause the Form S-1

to become effective on or before September 17, 2005. We subsequently amended the Registration Rights Agreement to grant us an extension until March 10, 2006 for the effective date of the registration of the shares and warrants issued in the PIPE Transaction. We are subject to liquidated damages of $650,000 per month, if we fail to meet the March 10, 2006 deadline.

Our domestic senior credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) is our primary source of external funding. Effective July 8, 2005, we executed a new $30 million, three year senior credit agreement with Bank of America N.A. and U.S. Bank N.A. This credit agreement expires July 8, 2008 and bears interest at the bank’s prime rate (6.75% at October 31, 2005) or is linked to LIBOR plus a percentage depending on our leverage ratios, at our option. The agreement sets forth specific financial covenants to be attained on a quarterly basis, which we believe, based on our financial forecasts, are achievable. At October 31, 2005, the balance outstanding on the Credit Agreement was $18.5 million against a maximum borrowing of $30 million. Our available credit at October 31, 2005, net of $2.3 million in outstanding letters of credit, was $9.2 million.

On August 26, 2005, we received $2.5 million for giving the exclusive right to Barton Mines Company to sell abrasive to our customers. Under a Purchase Agreement, we are also entitled to future annual payments of up to $250,000 for the next three years based on achievement of system sales targets and royalty payments for systems sold over the next 10 years.

Since fiscal 2004, we had been investigating, with approval from our Board, alternatives for our non-core operations. On October 31, 2005, we completed the sale of our Avure Business with Gores Technology for estimated net proceeds of $14.4 million, comprised of cash and notes. The Avure Business was comprised of the International and North America Press reporting segments as well as the non ultrahigh-pressure portion of our Food reportable segment. The ultrahigh-pressure portion of our Food segment will be reported under North America Waterjet on a go-forward basis. The results of operations are shown as discontinued operations in our financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any special purpose entities or off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

During the quarter ended October 31, 2005, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in our contractual obligations and minimum commercial commitments as reported in Amendment No. 2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005.

Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments and New Accounting Pronouncements

There are no material changes in our critical accounting policies as disclosed in Amendment No. 2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005. New accounting pronouncements are disclosed in Note 16 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

Our ultrahigh-pressure (“UHP) business which we call Waterjet is comprised of the following segments: North America Waterjet, Asia Waterjet, Other International Waterjet and Other.

Sales Summary:

Dollars in thousands


	Three months ended October 31,						Six months ended October 31,
	2005		2004		% Change		2005		2004		% Change
Operational breakdown:
Waterjet:
Systems	$	36,950	$	31,274	18	%	$	65,671	$	57,174	15	%
Consumable parts and services		13,735		12,813	7	%		27,000		25,212	7	%

	$	50,685	$	44,087	15	%	$	92,671	$	82,386	13	%

Geographic breakdown:
United States	$	28,992	$	25,308	15	%	$	53,492	$	45,826	17	%
Rest of Americas		6,828		4,710	45	%		11,009		9,605	15	%
Europe		7,397		7,616	(3	)%		14,934		14,151	6	%
Asia		7,468		6,453	16	%		13,236		12,804	3	%

	$	50,685	$	44,087	15	%	$	92,671	$	82,386	13	%

Three and Six Months Ended October 31, 2005 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended October 31, 2004

(Tabular amounts in thousands)

Sales.

Our sales by segment for the periods noted below is summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005	2004	Difference		%		2005	2004	Difference		%
Sales
Waterjet:
North America	28,644	20,663	7,981		39	%	51,571	36,563	15,008		41	%
Asia	7,468	6,453	1,015		16	%	13,236	12,804	432		3	%
Other International	8,789	8,396	393		5	%	17,242	15,532	1,710		11	%
Other	5,784	8,575	(2,791	)	(33	)%	10,622	17,487	(6,865	)	(39	)%

Waterjet Total	50,685	44,087	6,598		15	%	92,671	82,386	10,285		12	%

Our Waterjet business includes cutting and cleaning operations, which are focused on providing total solutions for the aerospace, automotive, job shop, surface preparation (cleaning) and paper industries. It is comprised of four reporting segments: North America Waterjet, Asia Waterjet, Other International Waterjet and Other. The North America, Asia and Other International Waterjet segments primarily represent sales of our standard cutting and cleaning systems throughout the world, as well as sales of our custom designed systems into the Aerospace industry. The ‘Other’ segment represents sales of our automation and robotic waterjet cutting sells which are sold primarily into the North American automotive industry.

For the three months ended October 31, 2005, total Waterjet sales of $50.6 million increased $6.6 million or 15% as compared to the prior year same period. For the six months ended October 31, 2005, total Waterjet sales of $92.7 million increased $10.3 million or 12% as compared to the prior year same period of which $15.0 million was recognized in our North America Waterjet segment. Last year we believed the market awareness of waterjet technology was low and addressed this through an increase in marketing and tradeshow activity, including attendance at the bi-annual International Manufacturing Technology Show in early September 2004, as well as increasing the number of domestic waterjet cutting direct sales staff from 10 to 15, adding of two

machine tool distributors and increasing domestic technical services staff from 12 to 24 persons. The growth in revenue in North America is a result of an increase in unit sales stemming from our increased sales and marketing activity as well as increased revenue recognition on large percentage-of-completion aerospace contracts. There were no significant price increases year over year; however, a price increase of 4% on selected systems was instituted on February 1, 2005. Aerospace sales, which are also included in the North America segment, were $7.5 million and $9.6 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, respectively, up $6.7 million and $8.4 million from the prior year same respective periods from work completed on aerospace contracts awarded in fiscal 2005.

For the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, Asia Waterjet segment revenue increased $1.0 million and $0.4 million, or 16% and 3% for the prior year same respective periods. This increase was fueled by expansion of waterjet systems into the electronics industry in Taiwan. Growth in the Other International Waterjet segment represents primarily sales into Europe and South America. Revenues from our European operations have declined $219,000 to $7.4 million during the three months ended October 31, 2005 on a strengthening dollar while improving by $783,000 for the six months ended October 31, 2005 to $14.9 million. Sales into South America of $1.4 million and $2.3 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 improved $612,000 and $927,000 over the respective prior year same periods on higher standard shapecutting system sales as the Company focused its efforts in this area. We typically sell our products at higher prices outside the U.S. due to the costs of servicing these markets.

The growth in our North America, Asia Waterjet, and Other International Waterjet segments were offset by declines in the ‘Other’ segments. The ‘Other’ segment recorded a $2.8 million and a $6.9 million decline for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 from the prior year same periods from a softness in the domestic automotive industry as well as from the closing and relocation of our Wixom, Michigan facility to our Burlington, Ontario facility. This shutdown was completed to combine like businesses and reduce operating costs.

We also analyze our Waterjet revenues by looking at system sales and consumable sales. Systems sales were $37.0 million, up $5.7 million or 18%, for the three months ended October 31, 2005 and up $8.5 million or 15%, for the six months ended October 31, 2005 due to strong domestic shapecutting sales as well as increased aerospace revenue. Consumables revenues recorded an increase of $922,000 or 7.2% to $13.7 million for the three months ended October 31, and $1.8 million or 7.1% to $27 million for the six months ended October 31, 2005, respectively. The majority of the increase in spares sales for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 was recorded in Europe and South America. The increasing number of systems in service, our proprietary productivity enhancing kits and improved parts availability as well as the use of Flowparts.com, our easy-to-use internet order entry system, offset domestic spare parts declines resulting from the elimination of garnet revenue pursuant to the Barton transaction. We believe that spare parts sales should continue to increase as more systems are put into service.

Cost of Sales and Gross Margins. Our gross margin by segment for the periods noted below is summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,					Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005	2004	Difference	%		2005	2004	Difference	%
	(restated)	(restated)				(restated)	(restated)
Gross Margin
Waterjet:
North America	13,878	9,616	4,262	44	%	24,865	17,586	7,279	41	%
Asia	3,549	2,871	678	24	%	6,359	5,726	633	11	%
Other International	3,281	2,671	610	23	%	6,542	5,051	1,491	30	%
Other	1,626	233	1,393	598	%	2,501	1,200	1,301	108	%

Waterjet Total	22,334	15,391	6,943	45	%	40,267	29,563	10,704	36	%

Our gross margin as a percent of sales by segment for the periods noted below is summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,				Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
	(restated)		(restated)		(restated)		(restated)
Gross Margin Percentage
Waterjet:
North America	48	%	47	%	48	%	48	%
Asia	48	%	44	%	48	%	45	%
Other International	37	%	32	%	38	%	33	%
Other	28	%	3	%	24	%	7	%
Waterjet Total	44	%	35	%	43	%	36	%

Gross margin for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 amounted to $22.3 million or 44% of sales and $40.3 million or 43%, respectively, as compared to gross margin of $15.4 million or 35% of sales and $29.6 million or 36% in the prior year same periods. Domestically, the gross margin improvements are attributable to cost reductions from global supply chain initiatives as well as improved cost absorption from higher sales volumes in standard shapecutting as well aerospace system sales. Asia Waterjet margins rose on strong product pricing and its improved product mix. The Other segment saw improved margins as the prior three and six month results included significant costs accrued on loss contracts at our Wixom, Michigan division which depressed margins to (18)% and (10)%, respectively. Current period margins in the Other segment are in line with margin expectations for this line of business. Generally, comparison of gross margin rates will vary period over period depending on the mix of sales, which includes special system, standard system and consumables sales. Gross margin rates on our systems sales are typically less than 45% as opposed to consumables sales which are in excess of 50%. In addition, gross margin as a percent of sales will vary amongst segments due to inter-company sales and the related inter-company transfer pricing.

Marketing Expenses. Our marketing expenses by segment for the periods noted below are summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005	2004	Difference		%		2005	2004	Difference		%
	(restated)	(restated)					(restated)	(restated)
Marketing:
Waterjet:
North America	4,329	3,822	507		13	%	8,355	6,828	1,527		22	%
Asia	1,069	892	177		20	%	2,030	1,733	297		17	%
Other International	2,241	1,869	372		20	%	4,505	3,841	664		17	%
Other	234	473	(239	)	(51	)%	559	890	(331	)	(37	)%

Waterjet Total	7,873	7,056	817		12	%	15,449	13,292	2,157		16	%

Marketing expenses increased $817,000 or 12% and $2.2 million or 16% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the prior year same periods. All segments experienced increases in their Marketing expenses for both periods with the exception of the Other segment. The increases are due to increased expenses such as commissions on higher sales, as well as increased marketing and advertising costs directed at increasing waterjet technology awareness. The Other segment decreased its expenses as the Wixom division was closed in Q2 and all marketing activity was handled through our Burlington facility. Expressed as a percentage of revenue, consolidated marketing expenses were 16% and 17% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 16% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2004.

Research and Engineering Expenses. Our research and engineering expenses by segment for the periods noted below are summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005	2004	Difference		%		2005	2004	Difference		%
	(restated)	(restated)					(restated)	(restated)
Research and Engineering Waterjet:
North America	1,429	971	458		47	%	3,043	2,289	754		33	%
Asia	129	80	49		61	%	235	158	77		49	%
Other International	103	179	(76	)	(42	)%	242	349	(107	)	(31	)%
Other	31	25	6		24	%	50	81	(31	)	(38	)%

Waterjet Total	1,692	1,255	437		35	%	3,570	2,877	693		24	%

Research and engineering expenses increased $437,000 or 35% and $693,000 or 24% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, as compared to the prior year same periods. Increases of $458,000 and $754,000 were recorded in the North America Waterjet segment for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005. This is attributable to the addition of key engineering personnel related to our core UHP technology. Expressed as a percentage of revenue, research and engineering expenses were 3% and 4% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 compared to 3% for the prior year same periods.

General and Administrative Expenses. Our general and administrative expenses by segment for the periods noted below are summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005	2004	Difference		%		2005	2004	Difference		%
	(restated)	(restated)					(restated)	(restated)
General and Administrative Waterjet:
North America	5,861	3,457	2,404		70	%	10,741	6,815	3,926		58	%
Asia	335	320	15		5	%	733	592	141		24	%
Other International	593	624	(31	)	(5	)%	1,168	1,259	(91	)	(7	)%
Other	346	437	(91	)	(21	)%	708	830	(122	)	(15	)%

Waterjet Total	7,135	4,838	2,297		47	%	13,350	9,496	3,854		41	%

General and administrative expenses increased $2.3 million or 47% and $3.9 million or 41% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, as compared to the prior year same periods. The increase was experienced primarily in the North America Waterjet segment which includes all of our corporate overhead costs. These costs were driven higher by legal costs of $936,000 and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and public company-related costs such as Sarbanes-Oxley consulting fees of $838,000 and $1.4 million for the same respective periods. Expressed as a percentage of revenue, consolidated general and administrative expenses were 14% for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, as compared to 11% and 12% for the prior year same periods.

Restructuring Expenses. During the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, we incurred $487,000 and $585,000 of severance benefits and other costs in the Other segment related to the closing and relocation of our Wixom, Michigan facility. No restructuring costs were incurred during the three and six months ended October 31, 2004.

Financial Consulting Expenses. No financial consulting costs were incurred in the six months ended October 31, 2005 compared with $623,000 in the prior year period associated with our efforts to refinance our subordinated debt. Because no new financing was obtained, these costs were charged to expense.

Operating Income (Loss). Our operating income (loss) by segment for the periods noted below are summarized as follows:


	Three Months Ended October 31,						Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005	2004		Difference	%		2005	2004		Difference	%
	(restated)	(restated)					(restated)	(restated)
Operating Income (Loss)
Waterjet:
North America	2,259	1,366		893	65	%	2,726	1,031		1,695	NM
Asia	2,016	1,579		437	28	%	3,361	3,243		118	4	%
Other International	344	(1	)	345	NM		627	(398	)	1,025	NM
Other	528	(702	)	1,230	NM		599	(601	)	1,200	NM

Waterjet Total	5,147	2,242		2,905	130	%	7,313	3,275		4,038	123	%

NM = Not Meaningful

Our operating income for the three months ended October 31, 2005 was $5.3 million versus a $2.2 million in the prior year period. For the six months ended October 31, 2005, the operating income was $7.4 million versus $3.3 million in the prior year period. The reasons for the changes in operating profit or loss by segment have been described in the paragraphs above addressing changes in sales, gross margin and operating expenses.

Interest and Other (Expense) Income, net. Current interest expense, net decreased to $437,000 and $1,363,000 for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005. This net amount includes $19,000 and $55,000 of interest income for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005. This decrease results lower interest rates charged coupled with lower average debt on our balance owing with the paydown of the subordinated debt in April 2005 as well as lower amortization of debt issue costs. During the three and six months ended October 31, 2005, we recorded Other (Expense) Income, net of $(1,129,000) and ($2,914,000) compared to Other (Expense) Income, net of $2,655,000 and $2,561,000 in the prior year three and six month period. These changes are the result of changes in realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses as described in the table below, offset by the $4,157,000 expense associated with the warrants used in the previously described PIPE transaction. The terms of these warrants require them to be marked-to-market at each reporting period with corresponding gains and losses reported on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We also entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Barton Mines Company (“Barton”) to give Barton exclusive rights to sell abrasive to the Company’s customers for $2.5 million in cash which was recorded as Other Income for the three and six months ended October 31, 2005.


	Three Months Ended October 31,					Six Months Ended October 31,
	2005			2004		2005			2004
Realized Foreign Exchange (Losses) Gains, Net	$	(237	)	$	726	$	(220	)	$	1,339
Unrealized Foreign Exchange Gains (Losses), Net		631			1,927		(458	)		1,251
Fair Value Adjustment on Warrants Issued		(4,157	)		—		(4,835	)		—
Gain on Barton Sale		2,500			—		2,500			—
Other		134			2		99			(29	)

	$	(1,129	)	$	2,655	$	(2,914	)	$	2,561

Income Taxes. For the three and six months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, the tax provision consists of current expense related to operations in foreign jurisdictions which are profitable primarily in Taiwan and Japan. In addition, operations in certain jurisdictions (principally Germany and US) reported net operating losses for which no tax benefit was recognized as it is more likely than not that such benefit will not be realized. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, as a result of foreign asset collateral requirements and our amended credit agreements, we were no longer able to permanently defer foreign earnings and recorded a $1.7 million liability

for withholding taxes payable on future repatriation of foreign earnings. We also recorded a U.S. tax liability of $6.7 million on foreign earnings which we have decided to no longer permanently defer. The total $6.7 million tax liability was offset by a reduction of the valuation allowance. In addition, we continue to assess our ability to realize our net deferred tax assets. Recognizing the cumulative losses generated during the quarter ended October 31, 2005 and in prior periods, we have determined it appropriate to continue to maintain a valuation allowance on our domestic net operating losses, certain foreign net operating losses and certain other deferred tax assets based on the expected reversal of both deferred tax assets and liabilities. The domestic net operating losses can be carried forward 20 years to offset domestic profits in future periods and expire from fiscal 2022 through fiscal 2024 if not used. Our foreign net operating losses currently do not have an expiration date. We provided a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets associated with the losses recorded during the quarter ended October 31, 2005.

Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax. In October 2005, we sold our Avure Business and have reacast our financial statements to reflect the Avure Business as discontinued operations for all historical periods presented. For the three months ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, loss from operations of discontinued operations was $184,000 and $1,004,000, respectively, primarily due to a significantly lower foreign exchange loss in the current quarter than the same quarter in the prior year. For the six months ended October 31, 2005, income from operations of discontinued operations was $966,000 compared to a loss of $673,000 in the same period in the prior year primarily due to a higher foreign exchange gain in the first quarter and a lower foreign exchange loss in the second quarter.

Net Income (Loss). Our consolidated net income in the three months ended October 31, 2005 amounted to $1.0 million, or $.03 basic and diluted income per share as compared to a net loss of $338,000, or $.02 basic and diluted loss per share in the prior year same periods. For the year-to-date period, our consolidated net income was $1.0 million or $.03 basic and diluted per share as compared to a net loss of $2.7 million, or $.17 basic and diluted loss per share in the prior year same period.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes in our market risk during the six months ended October 31, 2005. For additional information, refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as presented in the Amendment No. 2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the SEC.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referenced herein as the Exchange Act. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures performed pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of October 31, 2005, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the material weaknesses discussed below. Notwithstanding the existence of the material weaknesses described below, management has concluded that the consolidated financial

statements in this Form 10-Q/A fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In December 2004, in connection with the restatement of our fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 financial statements, and in November 2005 and January 2006, in connection with our restatement of our fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 financial statements, our former independent registered public accounting firm reported to management and to the Audit Committee material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management agrees with and has responded to the Audit Committee with our plans to remediate the material weaknesses communicated by our former independent registered public accounting firm. Remediation of these material weaknesses is ongoing.

The material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting are as follows:

•

The Company did not maintain effective controls over the financial reporting process due to an insufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with its financial reporting requirements and the complexity of the Company’s operations and transactions. Specifically, the Company incorrectly applied generally accepted accounting principles for (i) the impairment of goodwill, (ii) the classification of deferred tax balances, (iii) the valuation of anti-dilution warrants, (iv) the accrual of costs on contracts and balance sheet presentation of accounts receivable and cash receipts relating to contracts accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, (v) leases with rent escalation clauses, (vi) the recording of minority interest, and (viii) the computation of the provision for income taxes, affecting receivables, deferred income taxes, prepaid expenses, goodwill, other accrued liabilities, other long-term liabilities and taxes payable, customer deposits, minority interest, capital in excess of par, accumulated deficit, cost of sales, general and administrative expenses, impairment charge, interest expense and other income, net and the provision for income taxes. This material weakness contributed to the material weakness discussed below.

•

These control deficiencies resulted in the restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 as well as certain quarters in those years and in the restatement of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006. Additionally, each of these control deficiencies could result in a material misstatement of the aforementioned account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has determined that each of the above control deficiencies represents a material weakness.

Remediation of Material Weakness

Our management and Audit Committee have dedicated significant resources to assessing the underlying internal control deficiencies giving rise to the restatements and to ensure that proper steps have been and are being taken to improve our internal control over financial reporting. We have assigned the highest priority to the correction of these deficiencies and have taken and will continue to take action to fully correct them. Management is committed to instilling strong control policies and procedures and ensuring that the ‘tone at the top’ is committed to accuracy and completeness in all financial reporting. The remedial measures include the following:

•

Insufficient compliment of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles.

We have filled several positions in the corporate accounting and finance department with newly hired staff, including a financial planner, assistant controller and senior accountant. We have not completed the hiring process at corporate as we continue to assess our staffing needs. During August 2005, we hired a technical accounting manager to ensure compliance with all current and future accounting rules. Prior to that date the existing staff was addressing our application of technical accounting literature. We will continue to assess staffing needs at both corporate and our subsidiaries, and have identified the need for additional staff in the areas of accounting supervision and financial analysis. We have applied additional resources and time to improve the appropriateness and documentation of our conclusions on technical accounting issues. This will be enhanced with the addition of our technical accounting manager and other planned additions.

•

Lack of effective controls to ensure adequate analysis, documentation, reconciliation and review of accounting records. Lack of effective controls to ensure adequate monitoring and oversight of work performed by accounting and financial reporting personnel.

We engaged a financial consulting firm to assist in both detail reconciliation work, as well as reviewing current processes and controls and assistance in the development of prospective processes and controls over the inter-company reconciliation process. We created a standardized template used in the reconciliation of all our inter-company accounts. These reconciliations are reviewed for accuracy and completeness by our Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, we have created a new template for use in generation of our Statement of Cash Flows. We have modified our monthly divisional close checklist to ensure all required reconciliations are completed, as well as help ensure adherence to corporate policies and procedures. We have begun to improve the documentation of our accounting policies and procedures to ensure that all transactions are recorded consistently and with the appropriate level of documentation. As is described in the above paragraph, we still need to hire additional experienced staff to provide enhanced review, analysis and documentation of accounting transactions and of the consolidated financial statements.

The implementation of the initiatives described above, are among our highest priorities. Our Audit Committee will continually assess the progress and sufficiency of these initiatives and make adjustments as and when necessary. As of the date of this report, management believes that the plan outlined above, when completed, will eliminate the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as described above.

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Please refer to the sections “Risks and Uncertainties” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of risk factors.

Item 2. Changes in Securities; Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

We held our 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on September 23, 2004. At the meeting, three directors, Kathryn Munro, Jan Van Hagen, and John Janitz were elected to three-year terms ending with the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders receiving, respectively, 30,209,875, 30,211,162 and 30,079,891 votes in favor, with 1,471,972, 1,470,685 and 1,601,956 votes withheld, respectively.

The shareholders also voted to approve the Flow International Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The voting was as follows: 24,328,106 for; 1,559,379 against; 31,542 abstain; and 5,762,820 broker non-votes.

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits –


10.15		Registration Rights Agreement, as amended September 13, 2005, and as subsequently amended on October 17, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2005 and to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2005).

10.17		2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2005).

10.18		Annual Incentive Plan for Executives, Senior Managers and Select Administrative Staff (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2005).


10.19		Long Term Incentive Plan for Executives For the Fiscal Year Period Beginning May 1, 2005 and Ending April 30, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2005).

10.20		Purchase Agreement with Quintus Holdings, LLC dated September 30, 2005, as amended on October 31, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 4, 2005 and to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2005).

31.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Date: February 1, 2006		/s/ STEPHEN R. LIGHT
		Stephen R. Light President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: February 1, 2006		/s/ DOUGLAS P. FLETCHER
		Douglas P. Fletcher Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)