amreitform10q1stq2008.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
[
] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from _____ to _____
|
Commission
File
Number: 0-28378
|
(Name
of registrant as specified its charter)
|
TEXAS
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
76-0410050
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
8
GREENWAY PLAZA, SUITE 1000
HOUSTON,
TEXAS
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
77046
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
713-850-1400
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated
Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated
Filer x
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x
As of May
9, 2008 there were 5,775,464 class A, 4,142,632 class C and 10,960,618
class D common shares of beneficial interest of AmREIT, $.01 par value per
share, outstanding.
Item No.
|
|
Form 10-Q Report Page
|
|
PART
I
|
|
1
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
F-11
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
F-12
|
|
|
F-12
|
2
|
|
1
|
3
|
|
5
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
5
|
1A
|
|
5
|
2
|
|
5
|
3
|
|
5
|
4
|
|
5
|
5
|
|
5
|
6
|
|
5
|
Item 1.
Financial Statements
March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
(in
thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate investments at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
$ |
130,598 |
|
|
$ |
130,563 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
141,413 |
|
|
|
141,045 |
|
Tenant
improvements
|
|
|
10,072 |
|
|
|
10,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
282,083 |
|
|
|
281,713 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(16,858 |
) |
|
|
(15,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
265,225 |
|
|
|
266,087 |
|
Real
estate held for sale and investment in direct financing leases held for
sale, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,385 |
|
|
|
22,438 |
|
Net
investment in direct financing leases held for investment
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
Intangible
lease cost, net
|
|
|
12,407 |
|
|
|
13,096 |
|
Investment
in merchant development funds and other affiliates
|
|
|
15,305 |
|
|
|
10,514 |
|
Net
real estate investments
|
|
|
|
317,382 |
|
|
|
314,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Tenant
receivables, net
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
4,398 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Accounts
receivable - related party
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
5,386 |
|
Notes
receivable - related party
|
|
|
8,819 |
|
|
|
10,442 |
|
Deferred
costs
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
2,472 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
4,394 |
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$ |
344,100 |
|
|
$ |
343,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
$ |
173,905 |
|
|
$ |
168,560 |
|
Notes
payable, held for sale
|
|
|
12,692 |
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
7,699 |
|
Below
market leases, net
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
Security
deposits
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
196,688 |
|
|
|
193,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
shares, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none
issued
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Class
A common shares, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,634,489
and 6,626,559 shares issued, respectively
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Class
C common shares, $.01 par value, 4,400,000 shares
authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,154,691
and 4,143,971 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Class
D common shares, $.01 par value, 17,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,039,914
and 11,045,763 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Capital
in excess of par value
|
|
|
185,534 |
|
|
|
185,165 |
|
Accumulated
distributions in excess of earnings
|
|
|
(35,639 |
) |
|
|
(33,365 |
) |
Cost
of treasury shares, 520,879 and 337,308 Class A common shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(3,886 |
) |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
146,227 |
|
|
|
149,433 |
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
$ |
344,100 |
|
|
$ |
343,757 |
|
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
AmREIT
AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands, except per
share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
income from operating leases
|
|
$ |
7,673 |
|
|
$ |
7,054 |
|
|
Earned
income from direct financing leases
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Real
estate fee income
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
Real
estate fee income - related party
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
Construction
revenues
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
Construction
revenues - related party
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
Securities
commission income - related party
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
Asset
management fee income - related party
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
|
10,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
Property
expense
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
Construction
costs
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
Legal
and professional
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
Real
estate commissions
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
Securities
commissions
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
2,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and other income - related party
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
Loss
from merchant development funds and other affiliates
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Income
tax benefit for taxable REIT subsidiary
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(2,431 |
) |
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
Minority
interest in income of consolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before discontinued operations
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
Gain
on sales of real estate acquired for resale, net of taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
paid to class B, C and D shareholders
|
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
(2,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss available to class A shareholders
|
|
$ |
(1,501 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per class A common share - basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average class A common shares used to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compute
net loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
6,320 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
AmREIT
AND SUBSIDIARIES
For the
three months ended December 31, 2008
(in
thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
in
|
|
|
distributions
|
|
|
Cost
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Shares
|
|
|
excess
of
|
|
|
in
excess of
|
|
|
treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
par value
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
185,165 |
|
|
$ |
(33,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,584 |
) |
|
$ |
149,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
997 |
|
Deferred
compensation issuance of restricted shares, Class A
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Issuance
of common shares, Class A
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Repurchase
of common shares, Class A
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Issuance
of common shares, Class C
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Retirement
of common shares, Class C
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
Issuance
of common shares, Class D
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Retirement
of common shares, Class D
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1,219 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
Distributions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,271 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
185,534 |
|
|
$ |
(35,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,886 |
) |
|
$ |
146,227 |
|
See Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
AmREIT
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sales of real estate acquired for resale
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
Income
from merchant development funds and other affiliates
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Cash
receipts related to deferred related party fees
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
Minority
interest in income of consolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Distributions
from merchant development funds and other affiliates
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Increase
in tenant receivables
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
1,069 |
|
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable - related party
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
(817 |
) |
Cash
receipts from direct financing leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more
than income recognized
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Decrease
in other assets
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
Decrease
in accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
(4,227 |
) |
Increase
in security deposits
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
to real estate
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) |
Acquisition
of investment properties
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(9,157 |
) |
Loans
to affiliates
|
|
|
(1,466 |
) |
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
Payments
from affiliates
|
|
|
3,089 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Additions
to furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Investment
in merchant development funds and other affiliates
|
|
|
(5,068 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Distributions
from merchant development funds and other affiliates
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Decrease
in preacquisition costs
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,929 |
) |
|
|
(11,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
52,257 |
|
Payments
of notes payable
|
|
|
(12,615 |
) |
|
|
(34,738 |
) |
Increase
in deferred costs
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Issuance
of common shares
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Retirement
of common shares
|
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
Issuance
costs
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Common
dividends paid
|
|
|
(1,740 |
) |
|
|
(1,941 |
) |
Distributions
to minority interests
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
14,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
3,859 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
3,415 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
7,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
2,694 |
|
|
$ |
2,299 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008 and 2007, 0 and 30,000 class B common shares, respectively,
were converted to class A common shares. Additionally, during 2008 and
2007, we issued class C common and D common shares with a value of $1.5 million
and $1.6 million respectively, in satisfaction of dividends through the dividend
reinvestment program.
In 2007, we issued 131,000 restricted shares to employees and trust
managers as part of their compensation arrangements. The restricted shares
vest over a four and three year period, respectively. We recorded $1.1
million in deferred compensation related to the issuance of the restricted
shares.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AmREIT
AND SUBSIDIARIES
March
31, 2008
(unaudited)
We are an
established real estate company that has elected to be taxed as a real estate
investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. Our business model is
similar to an institutional advisory company that is judged by its investor
partners on the returns we are able to deliver to reach specified long-term
results. Our primary objective is to build long-term shareholder value and
continue to build and enhance the net asset value (“NAV”) of us and our advised
funds.
We seek
to create value and drive net operating income (“NOI”) growth on the properties
owned in our institutional-grade portfolio of Irreplaceable Corners™ and those
owned by a series of closed-end, merchant development funds. We also seek to
support a growing advisory business that raises capital through an extensive
independent broker-dealer channel as well as through institutional joint venture
partners.
Our
direct predecessor, American Asset Advisers Trust, Inc. (“AAA”), was formed as a
Maryland corporation in 1993. Prior to 1998, AAA was externally advised by
American Asset Advisors Corp. which was formed in 1985. In June 1998,
AAA merged with its advisor and changed its name to AmREIT, Inc. In
December 2002, AmREIT, Inc. reorganized as a Texas real estate investment
trust and became AmREIT.
Our class
A common shares are traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol
“AMY.” Our offices are located at 8 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000
Houston, Texas 77046. Our telephone number is 713.850.1400
and we maintain an internet site at www.amreit.com.
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
Our
financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby
revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when
incurred. The consolidated financial statements include our accounts
as well as the accounts of any wholly- or majority-owned subsidiaries in which
we have a controlling financial interest. Investments in joint
ventures and partnerships where we have the ability to exercise significant
influence but do not exercise financial and operating control, are accounted for
using the equity method, unless such entities qualify as variable interest
entities, and thus are considered for consolidation under applicable accounting
literature related to consolidation. All significant inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
We lease
space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. The majority of the leases
are accounted for as operating leases with revenue being recognized on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Accrued rents are
included in tenant receivables. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes,
maintenance expenses and insurance is recognized in the period the related
expense is recorded. Additionally, certain of the lease agreements contain
provisions that grant additional rents based on tenants’ sales volumes
(contingent or percentage rent). Percentage rents are recognized when the
tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. We
recognize lease termination fees in the period that the lease is terminated and
collection of the fees is reasonably assured. During the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we did not recognize any lease termination fees.
Lease termination fees are included in rental income from operating
leases. The terms of certain leases require that the
building/improvement portion of the lease be accounted for under the direct
financing method which treats the building as if we had sold it to the lessee
and entered into a long-term financing arrangement with such lessee. This
accounting method is appropriate when the lessee has all of the benefits and
risks of property ownership that they otherwise would if they owned the building
versus leasing it from us.
We have
been engaged to provide various real estate services, including development,
construction, construction management, property management, leasing and
brokerage. The fees for these services are recognized as services are provided
and are generally calculated as a percentage of revenues earned or to be earned
or of property cost, as appropriate. Revenues from fixed-price
construction contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method,
measured by the physical completion of the structure. Revenues from
cost-plus-percentage-fee contracts are recognized on the basis of costs incurred
during the period plus the percentage fee earned on those costs. Construction
management contracts are recognized only to the extent of the fee
revenue.
Construction
contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and any indirect
costs related to contract performance. Provisions for estimated losses on
uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are
determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated
profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and
final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are
recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Any profit
incentives are included in revenues when their realization is reasonably
assured. An amount equal to contract costs attributable to any claims is
included in revenues when realization is probable and the amount can be reliably
estimated.
Unbilled
construction receivables represent reimbursable costs and amounts earned under
contracts in progress as of the date of our balance sheet. Such amounts become
billable according to contract terms, which usually consider the passage of
time, achievement of certain milestones or completion of the project. Advance
billings represent billings to or collections from clients on contracts in
advance of revenues earned thereon. Unbilled construction receivables are
generally billed and collected within the twelve months following the date of
our balance sheet, and advance billings are generally earned within the twelve
months following the date of our balance sheet. As of March 31, 2008, $63,000 of
unbilled receivables has been included in “Accounts receivable” and $70,000 of
unbilled receivables due from related parties has been included in “Accounts
receivable – related party.” As of December 31, 2007, $4,000 of unbilled
receivables has been included in “Accounts receivable” and $85,000 of unbilled
receivables due from related parties has been included in “Accounts receivable –
related party.” We
had advance billings of $6,000 as of March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007.
Securities
commission income is recognized as units of our merchant development funds are
sold through our wholly-owned subsidiary, AmREIT Securities Company. Securities
commission income is earned as the services are performed and pursuant to the
corresponding prospectus or private offering memorandum. Generally, it includes
a selling commission of between 6.5% and 7.5%, a dealer-manager fee of between
2.5% and 3.25% and offering and organizational costs of 1.0% to 1.50%. The
selling commission is then paid to the unaffiliated selling broker-dealer and
reflected as securities commission expense.
REAL
ESTATE INVESTMENTS
Development
Properties – Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost.
Expenditures related to the development of real estate are carried at cost which
includes capitalized carrying charges, acquisition costs and development costs.
Carrying charges, primarily interest, real estate taxes and loan acquisition
costs, and direct and indirect development costs related to buildings under
construction, are capitalized as part of construction in progress. The
capitalization of such costs ceases at the earlier of one year from the date of
completion of major construction or when the property, or any completed portion,
becomes available for occupancy. We capitalize acquisition costs as
incurred. Such costs are expensed if and when the acquisition becomes no longer
probable. During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31,
2007 we capitalized $36,000 and $79,000, respectively, in interest on properties
under development.
Acquired Properties and
Acquired Lease Intangibles – We account for real estate acquisitions
pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141”). Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price of the
acquired properties to land, building and improvements, identifiable intangible
assets and to the acquired liabilities based on their respective fair
values. Identifiable intangibles include amounts allocated to
acquired out-of-market leases, the value of in-place leases and customer
relationship value, if any. We determine fair value based on
estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and
capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of
future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical
operating results, known trends and specific market and economic conditions that
may affect the property. Factors considered by management in our
analysis of determining the as-if-vacant property value include an estimate of
carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering market
conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating
carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and estimates
of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, tenant
demand and other economic conditions. Management also estimates costs
to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, tenant improvements,
legal and other related expenses. Intangibles related to
out-of-market leases and in-place lease value are recorded as acquired lease
intangibles and are amortized as an adjustment to rental revenue or amortization
expense, as appropriate, over the remaining
terms of the underlying leases. Premiums or discounts on acquired
out-of-market debt are amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of
such debt.
Depreciation —
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful
life of up to 50 years for buildings, up to 20 years for site
improvements and over the term of lease for tenant improvements. Leasehold
estate properties, where we own the building and improvements but not the
related ground, are amortized over the life of the lease.
Properties Held for
Sale — Properties are classified as held for sale if management has
decided to market the property for immediate sale in its present condition with
the belief that the sale will be completed within one year. Operating properties
held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell.
Depreciation and amortization are suspended during the held for sale period. As
of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 we owned 19 properties with a carrying
value of $22.4 million that were classified as real estate held for
sale.
Our
properties generally have operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished from the rest of our operations. The operations and gains on sales
reported in discontinued operations include those properties that have been sold
or are held for sale and for which operations and cash flows have been clearly
distinguished. The operations of these properties have been eliminated from
ongoing operations, and we will not have continuing involvement after
disposition. Prior period operating activity related to such properties has been
reclassified as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of
operations.
Impairment – We
review our properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including accrued rental
income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an
impairment in value occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the
property, with the carrying value of the individual property. If impairment is
indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of
the asset exceeds its fair value. No impairment charges were recognized for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007.
RECEIVABLES
AND ALLOWANCE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS
Tenant receivables —
Included in tenant receivables are base rents, tenant reimbursements and
receivables attributable to recording rents on a straight-line basis. An
allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued rents and accounts receivable
is determined based upon customer credit-worthiness (including expected recovery
of our claim with respect to any tenants in bankruptcy), historical bad debt
levels, and current economic trends. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
we had an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $157,000 related to our tenant
receivables.
Accounts receivable –
Included in accounts receivable are amounts due from clients of our construction
services business and various other receivables. As of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, we had an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $264,000
related to our accounts receivable.
Notes receivable – related
party – Included in related party notes receivable are loans made to our
affiliated merchant development funds as part of our treasury management
function whereby we place excess cash in short-term bridge loans for these
affiliates related to the acquisition or development of properties. We typically
provide such financing to our affiliates as a way of efficiently deploying our
excess cash and earning a higher return than we would otherwise earn in other
short term investments or overnight funds. In most cases, the funds have a
construction lender in place, and we step in and provide financing on the same
terms as the third party lender. In so doing, we are able to access these funds
as needed by having our affiliate then draw down on their construction loans.
These loans are unsecured, bear interest at the prime rate (5.25% at March 31,
2008) and are due upon demand.
DEFERRED
COSTS
Deferred
costs include deferred leasing costs and deferred loan costs, net of
amortization. Deferred loan costs are incurred in obtaining financing
and are amortized using a method that approximates the effective interest method
to interest expense over the term of the debt agreements. Deferred leasing costs
consist of external commissions associated with leasing our properties and are
amortized to expense over the lease term. Accumulated amortization
related to deferred loan costs as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007
totaled $711,000 and $627,000, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to
deferred leasing costs as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 totaled
$503,000 and $450,000, respectively.
Our
deferred compensation and long term incentive plan is designed to attract and
retain the services of our trust managers and employees that we consider
essential to our long-term growth and success. As such, it is designed to
provide them with the opportunity to own shares, in the form of restricted
shares, in us, and provide key employees the opportunity to participate in the
success of our affiliated actively managed merchant development funds through
the economic participation in our general partner companies. All long term
compensation awards are designed to vest over a period of three to seven years
and promote retention of our team.
Restricted Share
Issuances - Deferred compensation includes grants of restricted shares to
our trust managers and employees as a form of long-term compensation. The share
grants vest over a period of three to seven years. We determine the
fair value of the restricted shares as the number of shares awarded multiplied
by the closing price per share of our class A common shares on the grant date.
We amortize such fair value ratably over the vesting periods of the respective
awards. The following table presents restricted share activity during
the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
Non-vested
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
grant
date
fair value
|
|
Beginning
of period
|
|
|
410,830 |
|
|
$ |
7.67 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(43,315 |
) |
|
|
7.74 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(27,681 |
) |
|
|
7.96 |
|
End
of period
|
|
|
339,834 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
There
were no restricted shares issued during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 the weighted-average grant date
fair value of shares issued under our deferred compensation and long term
incentive plan was $8.51 per share. The total fair value of shares
vested during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $335,000 and
$323,000 respectively. Total compensation cost recognized related to
restricted shares during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$96,000 and $169,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2008, total
unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted shares was $2.6 million,
and the weighted average period over which we expect this cost to be recognized
is 3.75 years.
General Partner Profit
Participation Interests - We have assigned up to 45% of the economic
interest in certain of our merchant development funds to certain of our key
employees. This economic interest is received, as, if and when we receive
economic benefit from our profit participation, after certain preferred returns
have been paid to the partnership’s limited partners. This assignment of
economic interest generally vests over a period of five to seven years. This
allows us to align the interest of our employees with the interest of our
shareholders. Because any future profits and earnings from the merchant
development funds cannot be reasonably predicted or estimated, and any employee
benefit is contingent upon the benefit received by the general partner of the
merchant development funds, we recognize expense associated with the assignment
of these economic interests as we recognize the corresponding income from the
associated merchant development funds. No portion of the economic interest in
the merchant development funds that have provided profit participation to us to
date have been assigned to employees. Therefore, no compensation expense has
been recorded to date. See Note 3 below for a discussion of the
potential sale of assets from one our merchant development funds, AAA CTL Notes,
Ltd.
Tax-Deferred Retirement Plan
(401k) - We maintain a defined contribution 401k retirement plan for our
employees. This plan is available for all employees immediately upon
employment. The plan allows for contributions to be either invested
in an array of large, mid and small cap mutual funds or directly into class A
common shares. Employee contributions invested in our shares are limited to 50%
of the employee’s contributions. We match 50% of the employee’s contribution, up
to a maximum employee contribution of 4%. None of the employer contribution can
be matched in our shares.
Share Options - We
are authorized to grant options of our class A common shares as either incentive
or non-qualified share options, up to an aggregate of 6.0% of the total voting
shares outstanding. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
none of these options have been granted.
INCOME
TAXES
We
account for federal and state income taxes under the asset and liability
method.
Federal – We have
elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and are,
therefore, not subject to Federal income taxes to the extent of dividends paid,
provided we meets all conditions specified by the Internal Revenue Code for
retaining our REIT status, including the requirement that at least 90% of our
REIT taxable income be distributed to shareholders.
Our real
estate development and operating business, AmREIT Realty Investment Corporation
and subsidiaries (“ARIC”), is a fully integrated and wholly-owned business
consisting of brokers and real estate professionals that provide development,
acquisition, brokerage, leasing, construction, asset and property management
services to our publicly traded portfolio and merchant development funds as well
as to third parties. ARIC and our wholly-owned corporations that serve as the
general partners of our merchant development funds are treated for Federal
income tax purposes as taxable REIT subsidiaries (collectively, the “Taxable
REIT Subsidiaries”).
State – In May 2006,
the State of Texas adopted House Bill 3, which modified the state’s franchise
tax structure, replacing the previous tax based on capital or earned surplus
with one based on margin (often referred to as the “Texas Margin Tax”) effective
with franchise tax reports filed on or after January 1, 2008. The Texas Margin
Tax is computed by applying the applicable tax rate (1% for us) to the profit
margin, which, generally, will be determined for us as total revenue less a 30%
standard deduction. Although House Bill 3 states that the Texas
Margin Tax is not an income tax, SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, applies to the Texas
Margin Tax. We have recorded a margin tax provision of
$71,000 and $45,000 for the Texas Margin Tax for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per share has been computed by dividing net loss available to
class A common shareholders by the weighted average number of class A common
shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share has been computed by dividing net
income (as adjusted as appropriate) by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding plus the weighted average number of dilutive potential common
shares. Diluted earnings per share information is not applicable due to the
anti-dilutive nature of the class C and class D common shares which
represent 23.0 million and
20.5 million potential common shares for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
The
following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted
earnings per class A share for the three months ended March 31, as
indicated:
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Loss
to class A common shareholders*
|
|
|
(1,501 |
) |
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
Weighted
average class A common shares outstanding*
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
6,320 |
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
(0.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
* In
thousands
USE OF
ESTIMATES
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our
consolidated financial instruments consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents,
tenant receivables, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and
other liabilities and notes payable. The carrying value of cash, cash
equivalents, tenant receivables, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts
payable, other liabilities are representative of their respective fair values
due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Our revolving line of
credit has market-based terms, including a variable interest rate. Accordingly,
the carrying value of the line of credit is representative of its fair
value.
As of
March 31, 2008, the carrying value of our debt obligations associated with
assets held for investment was $173.9 million, $137.9 million of which
represented fixed rate obligations with an estimated fair value of
$145.0 million. As of December 31, 2007, the carrying value of our debt
obligations associated with assets held for investment was $168.6 million,
$138.1 million of which represented fixed rate obligations with an
estimated fair value of $139.1 million.
As of
March 31, 2008, the carrying value of our debt obligations associated with
assets held for sale was $12.7 million, all of which represented fixed rate
obligations with an estimated fair value of $13.8 million. As of December
31, 2007, the carrying value of our debt obligations associated with assets held
for sale was $12.8 million, all of which represented fixed rate obligations
with an estimated fair value of $13.6 million.
CONSOLIDATION
OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
As of
March 31, 2008, we are an investor in, and the primary beneficiary of, one
entity that qualifies as a variable interest entity pursuant to FIN 46R. This
entity was established to develop, own, manage, and hold property for investment
and comprises $7.0 million of our total consolidated assets at period end.
This entity, which we hold a 50% interest in, had no debt outstanding at period
end and had revenues of $44,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2008.
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
157, Fair Value
Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires
companies to disclose the fair value of financial instruments according to a
fair value hierarchy. Additionally, companies are required to provide
certain disclosures regarding instruments within the hierarchy, including a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for each major category of
assets and liabilities. SAFS No. 157 is effective for our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have
a material effect on our results of operations or financial
position.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands
opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We did not measure any eligible financial assets and
liabilities at fair value under the provisions of SFAS No. 159.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141R”). SFAS
No. 141R will change the accounting for business combinations. Under FAS 141R,
an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with
limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We
are currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 141R on our financial
position and results of operations beginning for fiscal year 2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS
No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity
in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of
the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests.
All other requirements of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively. We
are currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No.
160 on our consolidated financial statements.
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
The
following is a summary of our discontinued operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except for per share data):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Rental
revenue
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Earned
income from direct financing leases
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
expense
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Federal
income tax expense
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Legal
and professional
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Basic
and diluted income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
per
class A common share
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Included
in discontinued operations is the operating activity related to 19 of our
properties that are held for sale. Our AAA CTL portfolio comprises of
17 of these properties. Each of these 17 properties was treated as
investments in direct financing leases for financial reporting
purposes. See Note 3 for further discussion of AAA CTL.
STOCK
ISSUANCE COSTS
Issuance
costs incurred in the raising of capital through the sale of common shares are
treated as a reduction of shareholders’ equity.
CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS
For
purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, we consider all highly
liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand
deposits at commercial banks and money market funds.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain
amounts in the prior period consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the presentation used in the current period
consolidated financial statements. Such reclassifications had no effect on net
income (loss) or shareholders’ equity as previously reported.
AAA
CTL Notes, Ltd.
AAA CTL
Notes I Corporation (“AAA Corp”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, invested as a
general partner and limited partner in AAA CTL Notes, Ltd.
(“AAA”). AAA is a majority-owned subsidiary through which we
purchased 15 IHOP Corp. (“IHOP”) leasehold estate properties and two IHOP fee
simple properties. We have consolidated AAA in our financial
statements. Certain members of our management team have been assigned
a 51% aggregate interest in the income and cash flow of
AAA’s general partner. Net sales proceeds from the liquidation of AAA
will be allocated to the limited partners and to the general partner pursuant to
the AAA limited partnership agreement.
During
the third quarter of 2007, we elected to hold the AAA assets for
sale.
Merchant Development
Funds
As of
March 31, 2008, we owned, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, interests in six
limited partnerships which are accounted for under the equity method as we
exercise significant influence over, but do not control, the investee. In each
of the partnerships, the limited partners have the right, with or without cause,
to remove and replace the general partner by a vote of the limited partners
owning a majority of the outstanding units. These merchant development funds
were formed to develop, own, manage and add value to properties with an average
holding period of two to four years. Our interests in these merchant development
funds range from 2.1% to 10.5%. See Note 8 regarding transactions we
have entered into with our merchant development funds.
AmREIT Opportunity Fund
(“AOF”) — AmREIT Opportunity Corporation (“AOC”), our wholly-owned
subsidiary, invested $250,000 as a limited partner and $1,000 as a general
partner in AOF. We currently own a 10.5% limited partner interest in AOF.
Liquidation of AOF commenced in July 2002, and, as of March 31,2008, AOF has an
interest in one property. As the general partner, AOC receives a promoted
interest in cash flow and any profits after certain preferred returns are
achieved for its limited partners.
AmREIT Income & Growth
Fund, Ltd. (“AIG”) — AmREIT Income & Growth Corporation (“AIGC”), our
wholly-owned subsidiary, invested $200,000 as a limited partner and $1,000 as a
general partner in AIG. We currently own an approximate 2.0% limited partner
interest in AIG. Certain members of our management team have been
assigned a 49% aggregate interest in the income and cash flow of
AIGC. Pursuant to the AIG limited partnership agreement, net sales
proceeds from its liquidation (expected in 2008) will be allocated to the
limited partners, and to the general partner, AIGC, as, if and when the annual
return thresholds have been achieved by the limited partners.
AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund (“MIG”) — AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth Corporation, our
wholly-owned subsidiary, invested $200,000 as a limited partner and $1,000 as a
general partner in MIG. We currently own an approximate 1.3% limited partner
interest in MIG.
AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund II (“MIG II”) — AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth II
Corporation, our wholly- owned subsidiary, invested $400,000 as a limited
partner and $1,000 as a general partner in MIG II. We currently own an
approximate 1.6% limited partner interest in MIG II.
AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund III (“MIG III”) — AmREIT
Monthly Income & Growth III Corporation (“MIGC III”), our wholly-owned
subsidiary, invested $800,000 as a limited partner and $1,000 as a general
partner in MIG III. MIG III began raising money in
June 2005. The offering was closed in October 2006, and the
capital raised was approximately $71 million. Our $800,000 investment
represents a 1.1% limited partner interest in MIG III. Certain
members of our management team have been assigned a 28.5% general partner’s
share of aggregate interest in the income and cash flow of MIGC
III. Pursuant to the MIG III limited partnership agreement, net sales
proceeds from its liquidation (expected in 2012) will be allocated to the
limited partners, and to the general partner (MIGC III) as, if and when the
annual return thresholds have been achieved by the limited
partners.
AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund IV (“MIG IV”) - AmREIT Monthly Income & Growth IV
Corporation (“MIGC IV”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, invested $800,000 as a
limited partner and $1,000 as a general partner in MIG IV. MIG IV
began raising money in November 2006, and, as of March 31, 2008, had raised
approximately $50 million. We expect our limited partnership interest
at completion of the offering to be between 0.8% and 1.6%. Certain
members of our management team have been assigned a 28.5% general partner’s
share of aggregate interest in the income and cash flow of MIGC
IV. Pursuant to the MIG IV limited partnership agreement, net sales
proceeds from its liquidation (expected in 2013) will be allocated to the
limited partners, and to the general partner (MIGC IV) as, if and when the
annual return thresholds have been achieved by the limited
partners.
REITPlus, Inc.-
During the fourth quarter, a registration statement relating to REITPlus, Inc.
(“REITPlus”), a $550 million non-traded REIT offering that is advised by one of
our wholly-owned subsidiaries, was declared effective by the SEC, allowing
REITPlus to begin offering its common stock through our securities operation’s
broker-dealer network. REITPlus conducts
substantially all of its operations through REITPlus Operating Partnership, LP
(“REITPlus OP”) which will own substantially all of the properties acquired on
REITPlus’s behalf. On May 16, 2007, we purchased 100 shares of common
stock of REITPlus for total cash consideration of $1,000 and were admitted as
the initial shareholder. Additionally, on May 16, 2007, we made an
initial limited partner contribution of $1 million to REITPlus OP. As
of March 31, 2008, REITPlus had not yet received subscriptions for its minimum
offering of $2,000,000, and therefore had not admitted any public stockholders
or made any investments.
Our
wholly owned subsidiary serve as the advisor to REITPlus and will therefore earn
recurring fees such as asset management and property management fees, and
transactional fees such as acquisition fees, development fees, financing
coordination fees, and real estate sales commissions. We will also participate
in a 15% promoted interest, payable upon REITPlus’ liquidation, listing of its
shares on a national securities exchange, or the termination or non-renewal of
the advisory agreement with our subsidiary (other than for cause) after the
REITPlus stockholders receive or are deemed to have received, their
invested capital plus a 7% preferred return. In our capacity as the
parent company of the advisor to REITPlus, we have paid organization and
offering costs of $1.6 million on its behalf. We have recorded these costs as a
receivable in the accompanying financial statements and we expect reimbursement
for them throughout the offering period as the capital is raised. Once REITPlus
meets its minimum subscription threshold, such costs will be reimbursed to us
subject to limitations on reimbursements set forth in the advisory
agreement.
The
following table sets forth certain financial information for the AIG, MIG, MIG
II, MIG III and MIG IV merchant development funds (AOF is not included as it is
currently in liquidation) and REITPlus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharing
Ratios(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Merchant
Development
Fund
|
|
Capital
under
Management
|
|
LP
Interest
|
|
|
GP
Interest
|
|
Scheduled
Liquidation
|
|
LP
|
|
|
GP
|
|
|
LP
Preference
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
$ |
3
million
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
2008
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
40%
Catch Up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIG
|
|
$ |
15
million
|
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
2010
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
40%
Catch Up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIG
II
|
|
$ |
25
million
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
2011
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
40%
Catch Up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIG
III
|
|
$ |
71
million
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
2012
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
40%
Catch Up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIG
IV
|
|
$ |
50
million
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
2013
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
8.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
40%
Catch Up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REITPlus
(2)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
2014
|
|
|
99%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Illustrating the Sharing Ratios and LP Preference provisions using AIG as an
example, the LPs share in 99% of the cash distributions until they receive an 8%
preferred return. The LPs share in 90% of the cash distributions
until they receive a 10% preferred return and so on.
(2)
REITPlus will commence receiving capital in the second quarter of
2008.
(3) We
will be entitled to distributions from REITPlus with respect to our $1 million
investment to the same extent as stockholders who purchase shares in the public
offering. For a description of our subsidiary’s promoted interest in
REITPlus, please see the second paragraph under “REITPlus, Inc.” above in the
Section 3.
Other
Affiliates
Other
than the merchant development funds, we have an investment in three entities
that are accounted for under the equity method since we exercise significant
influence over such entities. We invested $3.4 million in AmREIT Woodlake,
LP, and we have a 30% limited partner interest in the partnership. AmREIT
Woodlake, LP was formed in 2007 to acquire, lease and manage Woodlake Square, a
shopping center located on the west side of Houston, Texas at the intersection
of Westheimer and Gessner. Also, we invested $3.8 million in
AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, LP, and we have a 30% limited partner interest in the
partnership. AmREIT Westheimer Gessner, LP was formed in 2007 to acquire, lease
and manage Borders Shopping Center, a shopping center located on the west side
of Houston, TEXAS at the intersection of Westheimer and Gessner. Additionally,
we invested $5.1 million in AmREIT SPF Shadow Creek, LP, and we have a 10%
limited partner interest in the partnership. AmREIT SPF Shadow Creek, LP was
formed in 2008 to acquire, lease and manage Shadow Creek Ranch, a shopping
center located on the west side of Houston, TEXAS at the intersection of Highway
288 and 518.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 141, we have identified and recorded the value of
intangibles at the property acquisition date. Such intangibles include the value
of in-place leases and out-of-market leases. These assets are amortized over the
leases’ remaining terms. The amortization of above-market leases is recorded as
a reduction of rental income and the amortization of in-place leases is recorded
to amortization expense. The amortization expense related to in-place leases was
$601,000 and $631,000 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2007, respectively. The amortization of above-market leases, which was
recorded as a reduction of rental income, was $88,000 and $107,000 during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively.
In-place
and above-market lease amounts and their respective accumulated amortization at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
|
In-Place
leases
|
|
|
Above-market
leases
|
|
|
In-Place
leases
|
|
|
Above-market
leases
|
|
Cost
|
|
$ |
18,964 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
|
$ |
19,052 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
(7,423 |
) |
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
|
|
(6,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
Intangible
lease cost, net
|
|
$ |
11,541 |
|
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
$ |
12,142 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
Acquired
lease intangible liabilities (below-market leases) of $3.3 million and $3.4 as
of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, are net of previously
accreted minimum rent of $1.7 million and $1.6 million
at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Below-market leases are
accreted over the leases’ remaining terms. The accretion of below-market leases,
which was recorded as an increase to rental income, was $135,000 and $137,000
during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007,
respectively.
Our
outstanding debt at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
Notes
Payable, Held for Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate mortgage loans
|
|
|
137,852 |
|
|
|
138,121 |
|
Variable-rate
unsecured line of credit |
|
|
36,054 |
|
|
|
30,439 |
|
Total |
|
|
173,906 |
|
|
|
168,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable, Held
for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate mortgage loans |
|
|
12,692 |
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
Total
|
|
|
12,692 |
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
We have
an unsecured credit facility in place which is being used to provide funds for
the acquisition of properties and working capital. The credit facility matures
in October 2009 and provides that we may borrow up to $70 million subject to the
value of unencumbered assets. Effective October 2007, we renewed our
credit facility on terms and conditions substantially the same as the previous
facility. The credit facility contains covenants which, among other
restrictions, require us to maintain a minimum net worth, a maximum leverage
ratio, maximum tenant concentration ratios, specified interest coverage and
fixed charge coverage ratios and allow the lender to approve all
distributions. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we violated two
covenants per the terms of the credit facility. Our lender has waived
both events of non-compliance as of March 31, 2008. We were in
compliance with all other covenants as of March 31, 2008. The credit facility’s
annual interest rate varies depending upon our debt to asset ratio, from LIBOR
plus a spread of 1.0% to LIBOR plus a spread of 1.85%. As of March
31, 2008, the interest rate was LIBOR plus 1.00%. As of March 31, 2008, there
was a balance outstanding of $36.1 million under our credit facility. We have
approximately $31.9 million available under our credit facility, subject to the
covenants above. We have $2.0 million in letters of credit
outstanding related to various properties. These letters of credit
reduce our availability under our credit facility.
As of
March 31, 2008, the weighted average interest rate on our fixed-rate debt was
5.78%, and the weighted average remaining life of such debt was
6.5 years. We added no fixed-rate debt during the three months
ended March 31, 2008. We added fixed-rate debt of $19.9 million
during 2007.
As of
March 31, 2008, scheduled principal repayments on notes payable and the credit
facility were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Associated
with Assets
|
|
Associated
with Assets
|
|
|
|
Held
for Investment
|
|
Held
for Sale
|
Scheduled
Payments by Year
|
|
Scheduled
Principal
Payments
|
|
|
Term-Loan
Maturities
|
|
|
Total
Payments
|
|
|
Scheduled
Principal
Payments
|
|
|
Term-Loan
Maturities
|
|
|
Total
Payments
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
13,410 |
|
|
$ |
14,059 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
2009
|
|
|
36,972 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
36,972 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
531 |
|
2010
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
574 |
|
2011
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
620 |
|
2012
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
25,353 |
|
|
|
26,332 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
10,596 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
88,900 |
|
|
|
90,919 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Unamortized
debt premiums
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
42,588 |
|
|
$ |
131,317 |
|
|
$ |
173,905 |
|
|
$ |
2,411 |
|
|
$ |
10,281 |
|
|
$ |
12,692 |
|
As of
March 31, 2008, one property individually accounted for more than 10% of our
consolidated total assets – Uptown Park in Houston, Texas, which accounted for
14% of total assets. Consistent with our strategy of investing in areas that we
know well, 17 of our properties are located in the Houston metropolitan area.
These Houston properties represent 66% of our base rental income for the
three months ended March 31, 2008. Houston is Texas’ largest city and the fourth
largest city in the United States.
Following
are the base rents generated by our top tenants for the periods ended March 31
2008 and 2007 ($ in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
Tenant
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Kroger
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
585 |
|
IHOP
Corporation*
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
CVS
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Landry's
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Linens
N things
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Hard
Rock Cafe
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Champps
Americana
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Paesanos
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
TGI
Fridays
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Golden
Corral
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
|
$ |
2,430 |
|
* A
significant portion of IHOP Corporation revenues are related to our AAA assets
which we have elected to hold for sale as described in Note 3. The
activity related to these assets held for sale is reflected as “Earned Income
from DFL” in the Discontinued Operations section of Note 1.
Class A Common
Shares — Our class A common shares are listed on the American Stock
Exchange (“AMEX”) and traded under the symbol “AMY.” As of March 31, 2008, there
were 6,113,610 of our class A common shares outstanding, net of 520,879 shares
held in treasury. Our payment of any future dividends to our class A common
shareholders is dependent upon applicable legal and contractual restrictions,
including the provisions of the class C common shares, as well as our earnings
and financial needs.
Class B Common
Shares — As of December 31, 2007 none of the class B common shares were
outstanding. In December 2006, we completed a tender offer for approximately 48%
of our class B common shares in which we repurchased 998,000 shares at $9.25 per
share for a total purchase price of $9.2 million. We redeemed the remaining 1
million outstanding shares as of December 2007 at $10.18 per share for $10.4
million in cash.
Class C Common
Shares — The class C common shares are not listed on an exchange and
there is currently no available trading market for the class C common shares. As
of March 31, 2008, there were 4,154,691 of our class C common shares
outstanding. The class C common shares have voting rights, together with all
classes of common shares, as one class of shares. The class C common shares were
issued at $10.00 per share. The class C common shares receive a fixed 7.0%
preferred annual dividend, paid in monthly installments, and are convertible
into the class A common shares after a 7-year lock out period based on 110% of
invested capital, at the holder’s option. The class C common shares
are convertible beginning in August 2010. We have the right to force
conversion of the class C common shares into class A shares on a one-for-one
basis or to redeem the shares at a cash redemption price of $11.00 per share at
the holder’s option. Currently, there is a class C dividend
reinvestment program that allows investors to reinvest their dividends into
additional class C common shares. These reinvested shares are also convertible
into the class A common shares after the 7-year lock out period and receive the
10% conversion premium upon conversion.
Class D Common
Shares — The class D common shares are not listed on an exchange and
there is currently no available trading market for the class D common shares. As
of March 31, 2008, there were 11,039,914 of our class D common shares
outstanding. The class D common shares have voting rights, together with all
classes of common shares, as one class of shares. The class D common shares were
issued at $10.00 per share. The class D common shares receive a fixed 6.5%
annual dividend,
paid in monthly installments, subject to payment of dividends then payable to
class B and class C common shares. The class D common shares are convertible
into the class A common shares at a 7.7% premium on original capital after a
7-year lock out period, at the holder’s option. The class D common shares are
convertible beginning in June 2011. We have the right to force
conversion of the class D common shares into class A shares at the 7.7%
conversion premium or to redeem the shares at a cash price of $10.00. In either
case, the conversion premium will be pro rated based on the number of years the
shares are outstanding. Currently, there is a class D dividend reinvestment
program that allows investors to reinvest their dividends into additional class
D common shares. These reinvested shares are also convertible into the class A
common shares after the 7-year lock out period and receive the 7.7% conversion
premium upon conversion.
Minority Interest —
Minority interest represents a third party interest in entities that we
consolidate as a result of our controlling financial interest in such
investees. As of March 31, 2008, $1.2 million of the minority
interest is attributable to a third party interest in AAA which is held for sale
as of March 31, 2008 as discussed in Note 3.
Share Repurchase
Program
In June
2007, our Board of Trust Managers authorized a common share repurchase program
as part of our ongoing investment strategy. Under the terms of the program, we
may purchase up to a maximum value of $5 million of our common shares of
beneficial interest. Share repurchases may be made in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions at the discretion of management and as market
conditions warrant. We anticipate funding the repurchase of shares
primarily through the proceeds received from general corporate funds as well as
through the use of our credit facility.
Repurchases
of our common shares of beneficial interest for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
are as follows:
Period
|
(a)
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
(c)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
As
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
|
(d)
Maximum
Dollar
Value
of Shares that
May
Yet be Purchased
Under
the Program
|
January
1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
|
156,490
|
$6.99
|
156,490
|
$2,618,707
|
See Note
3 regarding investments in merchant development funds and other affiliates and
Note 2 regarding related party notes receivable.
We earn
real estate fee income by providing property acquisition, leasing, asset
management, property management, financing, coordination, real estate
disposition, construction and construction management services to our merchant
development funds. The companies that serve as the general partner
for the funds are wholly-owned by us. Real estate fee income of $1.4 million and
$713,000 was paid by our merchant development funds to us for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007, respectively. Additionally,
construction revenues of $904,000 and $876,000 were earned from the merchant
development funds during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. We earn asset management fees from the funds for facilitating the
deployment of capital and for performing other management oversight
services. Asset management fees of $376,000 and $284,000 were paid by
the funds to us for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007 we were reimbursed by the merchant development funds $229,000 and
$0, respectively, for reimbursements of administrative costs and for
organization and offering costs incurred on behalf of those funds.
As a
sponsor of real estate investment opportunities to the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) financial planning broker-dealer community, we
maintain an indirect 1% general partner interest in the investment funds that we
sponsor. The limited partnership funds are typically structured such
that the limited partners receive 99% of the available cash flow until 100% of
their original invested capital has been returned and a preferred return has
been met. Once this has happened, then the general partner begins
sharing in the available cash flow at various promoted levels. We
also may assign a portion of this general partner interest in these investment
funds to our employees as long term, contingent compensation. We
believe that this assignment will align the interest of management with that of
the shareholders, while at the same timeallowing for a competitive compensation
structure in order to attract and retain key management positions without
increasing the overhead burden.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, we did not sell any
properties.
In May
2007, we acquired a 2-acre parcel of land in Champaign, Illinois that was
acquired for resale and is currently under development for a national tenant
that is in the rental equipment business. In February 2007, we
acquired The Woodlands Mall Ring Road property, which represents 66,000 square
feet of gross leaseable area in Houston, Texas. The property is
ground-leased to five tenants, including Bank of America, Circuit City and
Landry’s Seafood. Additionally, during 2007, we sold one
property acquired for resale for $1.4 million which approximated our
cost.
In March
2004, we signed a new lease agreement for our office facilities which expires
August 31, 2009. In addition, we lease various office equipment for daily
activities. Rental expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
was $84,000 and $70,000, respectively.
Through
our treasury shares repurchase program, authorized in June 2007 by our Board of
Trust Managers as part of our ongoing investment strategy, we repurchased
300,000 shares on April 1, 2008 for $2.259 million.
The
operating segments presented are the segments of AmREIT for which separate
financial information is available, and revenue and operating performance is
evaluated regularly by senior management in deciding how to allocate resources
and in assessing performance.
The
portfolio segment consists of our portfolio of single and multi-tenant shopping
center projects. This segment consists of 50 properties located in 15 states.
Expenses for this segment include depreciation, interest, minority interest,
legal cost directly related to the portfolio of properties and property level
expenses. Our consolidated assets are substantially all in this segment.
Additionally, substantially all of the increase in total assets during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 occurred within the portfolio segment.
Our real
estate development and operating business is a fully integrated and wholly-owned
business consisting of brokers and real estate professionals that provide
development, acquisition, brokerage, leasing, construction, and asset and
property management services to our publicly traded portfolio and merchant
development funds as well as to third parties. Our securities operations consist
of FINRA registered securities broker-dealer business that, through the internal
securities group, raises capital from the independent financial planning
marketplace. The merchant development funds sell limited partnership interests
and non-listed REIT securities to retail investors, in which we invest as both
the general partner and as a limited partner; in the case of the limited
partnerships, and as a stockholder in the REIT or a limited partner in the
REIT’s operating partnership (see Note 3). These merchant development funds were
formed to develop, own, manage, and add value to properties with an average
holding period of two to four years with respect to the limited partnerships,
and an extended term consistent with REIT status for REITPlus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Advisory
|
|
|
|
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2008 ($ in 000's)
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Real
Estate Operations
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Merchant
Development Funds
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Rental
income
|
|
|
$ |
7,733 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,733 |
|
Real
estate fee income
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
Construction
revenues
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
Securities
commission income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Asset
management fee income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
7,791 |
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
11,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
Property
expense
|
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
Construction
costs
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Legal
and professional
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443 |
|
Real
estate commissions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Securities
commissions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
485 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
4,537 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
(2,153 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(2,431 |
) |
Other
income/ (expense)
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(553 |
) |
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Advisory
|
|
|
|
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2007 ($ in 000's)
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Real
Estate Operations
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Merchant
Development Funds
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Rental
income
|
|
|
$ |
7,113 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,113 |
|
Real
estate fee income
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
Construction
revenues
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
973 |
|
Securities
commission income
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
993 |
|
Asset
management fee income
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
10,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
Property
expense
|
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
Construction
costs
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
861 |
|
Legal
and professional
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Real
estate commissions
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Securities
commissions
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
829 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
(1,962 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
Other
income/ (expense)
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,278 |
|
|
$ |
(180 |
) |
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
The
use of the words “we,” “us” or “our” refers to AmREIT and our subsidiaries,
except where the context otherwise requires.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
information presented in this Form 10-Q constitutes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based
upon reasonable assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from
those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might
cause such a difference include the following: changes in general economic
conditions, changes in real estate market conditions, continued availability of
proceeds from our debt or equity capital, our ability to locate suitable tenants
for our properties, the ability of tenants to make payments under their
respective leases, timing of acquisitions, development starts and sales of
properties and the ability to meet development schedules. Any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made, and the Company
undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to
reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes
to future operation results over time.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report, as
well as our 2007 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
our filing on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Historical results
and trends which might appear should not be taken as indicative of future
operations.
EXECUTIVE
OVERVIEW
We are an
established real estate company that has elected to be taxed as a real estate
investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. Our business model is
similar to an institutional advisory company that is judged by its investor
partners on the returns we are able to deliver to reach specified long-term
results. Our primary objective is to build long-term shareholder value and
continue to build and enhance the net asset value (“NAV”) of us and our advised
funds.
We seek
to create value and drive net operating income (“NOI”) growth on the properties
owned in our institutional-grade portfolio of Irreplaceable Corners™ and those
owned by a series of closed-end, merchant development funds. We also seek to
support a growing advisory business that raises capital through an extensive
independent broker-dealer channel as well as through institutional joint venture
partners.
The
institutional-grade portfolio of Irreplaceable Corners – premier retail
properties in high-traffic, highly-populated areas – are held for long-term
value and to provide a foundation to our funds from operations (“FFO”) through a
steady stream of rental income. Our advisory business has a 24-year track record
of delivering returns to its investor partners through a series of closed-end,
merchant development funds, resulting in recurring income from assets under
management and in transactional income through profit participation interests
and real estate fees, including acquisition, development and leasing
fees.
The
recurring-income nature of the institutional-grade portfolio of Irreplaceable
Corners and the advisory business can be complemented by the added growth
potential of our real estate development and operating business. This
model seeks to provide value through offering an array of services to our
tenants and to the properties owned in both the institutional-grade portfolio of
Irreplaceable Corners and those owned by the closed-end, merchant development
funds as well as to third parties.
When we
listed on the AMEX in July 2002, our total assets had a book value of $48
million and equity under management within our advisory business totaled $15
million. As of March 31, 2008:
·
|
We
owned a real estate portfolio consisting of 50 properties located in 15
states that had a net book value of $344
million;
|
·
|
We
directly managed, through our five actively managed merchant development
funds, a total of $164 million in contributed capital;
and
|
·
|
We
had over $1.3 million square feet of retail centers in various stages of
development, re-development or in the pipeline for both our advisory
business and for third parties.
|
Portfolio
of Irreplaceable Corners
Our
portfolio consists primarily of premier retail properties typically located on
“Main and Main” intersections in high-traffic, highly populated affluent areas.
Because of their location and exposure as central gathering places, we believe
these centers attract well established tenants and can withstand the test of
time, providing our shareholders a steady rental income stream.
As of
March 31, 2008, we owned a real estate portfolio consisting of 50 properties
located in 15 states. A majority of our properties are located in
densely populated, suburban communities in and around Houston, Dallas and San
Antonio. Within these broad markets, we target locations that we believe have
the best demographics and highest long term value. We refer to these
properties as Irreplaceable Corners. Our criteria for an Irreplaceable Corner
includes: high barriers to entry (typically infill locations in
established communities without significant raw land available for development),
significant population within a three mile radius (typically in excess of
100,000 people), a location on the hard corner of an intersection guided by a
traffic signal, ideal average household income in the surrounding community in
excess of $80,000 per year, strong visibility and significant traffic counts
passing by the location (typically in excess of 30,000 cars per
day). We believe that centers with these characteristics will provide
for consistent leasing demand and rents that increase at or above the rate of
inflation. Additionally, these areas have barriers to entry for
competitors seeking to develop new properties due to the lack of available
land. We take a very hands-on approach to ownership, and directly
manage the operations and leasing at all of our wholly owned
properties.
We expect
that single-tenant, credit leased properties will continue to experience cap
rate pressure during 2008 due to the low interest rate environment and increased
buyer demand. Therefore, we will continue to divest of properties
which no longer meet our core criteria, and, to the extent that we can do so
accretively, replace them with high quality grocery-anchored, lifestyle, and
multi-tenant shopping centers or the development of single-tenant properties
located on Irreplaceable Corners. Each potential acquisition is
subjected to a rigorous due diligence process that includes site inspections,
financial underwriting, credit analysis and market and demographic
studies. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will ultimately
purchase any or all of these projects. Our acquisitions program is
sensitive to changes in interest rates. As of March 31, 2008, 81% of
our outstanding debt had a long-term fixed interest rate with an average term of
6.5 years. Our philosophy continues to be matching long-term leases
with long-term debt structures while keeping our debt to total assets ratio less
than 55%.
Advisory
Business
The
primary goal of our advisory business is to grow assets under management,
primarily through the Independent Broker-dealer Network (“IBD”) and through
institutional joint venture relationships. Through these assets under
management, we are able to generate current recurring fee income, long term
profit participation, and transactional revenues for real estate services
provided such as acquisition, development and leasing. We break this
business down into two components, our securities operations and our merchant
development funds. In an effort to vertically integrate our business model and
better control the inflows of capital into our advisory business, we have a
wholly owned Financial Industry Regulatory Agency (FINRA) registered
broker-dealer, AmREIT Securities Company (“ASC”). For the past 24
years, we have been raising capital for our merchant development funds and
building relationships in the financial planning and broker-dealer community,
earning fees and sharing in profits from those
activities. Historically, our advisory group has raised capital in
two ways: first, directly for us through non-traded classes of common
shares, and second, for our actively managed merchant development
funds.
The
advisory business invests in and actively manages seven merchant development
partnership funds which were formed to develop, own, manage, and add value to
properties with an average holding period of two to four years and REITPlus,
Inc., a non-listed REIT that will acquire properties to be held for an extended
period consistent with its intention to qualify as a REIT. We invest
in the limited partnerships we manage as both the general partner and as a
limited partner, and in REITPlus we have invested as a limited partner in its
operating partnership. Our advisory business sells interests in these funds to
retail investors. We, as the general partner or advisor, manage the funds and,
in return, receive management fees as well as potentially significant profit
participation interests. However, we strive to create a structure
that aligns the interests of our shareholders with those of the investors in our
managed funds. In this spirit, the funds are structured so that the
general partner does not receive a significant profit until after the limited
partners in the funds have received or are deemed to have received their
targeted return, which links our success to that of the investors in our managed
funds.
Real
Estate Development and Operating Group
Our real
estate development and operating business, “ARIC”, is a fully integrated and
wholly-owned business consisting of brokers and real estate professionals that
provide development, acquisitions, brokerage, leasing, construction, general
contracting, asset and property management services to our portfolio of
properties, to our advisory business, and to third parties. This
operating subsidiary, which is a taxable REIT subsidiary, is
transaction-oriented, is very active in the real estate market and has the
potential to generate significant earnings on an annual basis. This
business can provide significant long-term growth; however due to its
transactional nature, its quarter to quarter results will fluctuate, and
therefore its contributions to our earnings will be volatile.
Summary
of Critical Accounting Policies
Our
results of operations and financial condition, as reflected in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and related footnotes, are subject to
management’s evaluation and interpretation of business conditions, retailer
performance, changing capital market conditions and other factors, which could
affect the ongoing viability of our tenants. Management believes the most
critical accounting policies in this regard are revenue recognition, the regular
evaluation of whether the value of a real estate asset has been impaired, the
allowance for uncollectible accounts and accounting for real estate
acquisitions. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an on-going basis. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable based on the circumstances.
Revenue Recognition —
We lease space to tenants under agreements with varying terms. The majority of
the leases are accounted for as operating leases with revenue being recognized
on a straight-line basis over the terms of the individual leases. Accrued rents
are included in tenant receivables. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes,
maintenance expenses and insurance is recognized in the period the related
expense is recorded. Additionally, certain of the lease agreements contain
provisions that grant additional rents based on tenants’ sales volumes
(contingent or percentage rent). Percentage rents are recognized when the
tenants achieve the specified targets as defined in their lease agreements. The
terms of certain leases require that the building/improvement portion of the
lease be accounted for under the direct financing method which treats the
building as if we had sold it to the lessee and entered into a long-term
financing arrangement with such lessee. This accounting method is appropriate
when the lessee has all of the benefits and risks of property ownership that
they otherwise would if they owned the building versus leasing it from
us.
We have
been engaged to provide various services, including development, construction,
construction management, property management, leasing and brokerage. The fees
for these services are recognized as services are provided and are generally
calculated as a percentage of revenues earned or to be earned or of property
cost, as appropriate. Revenues from fixed-price construction contracts are
recognized on the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the physical
completion of the structure. Revenues from cost-plus-percentage-fee contracts
are recognized on the basis of costs incurred during the period plus the
percentage fee earned on those costs. Construction management contracts are
recognized only to the extent of the fee revenue.
Construction
contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and any indirect
costs related to contract performance. Provisions for estimated losses on
uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are
determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated
profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and
final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are
recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Any profit
incentives are included in revenues when their realization is reasonably
assured. An amount equal to contract costs attributable to any claims is
included in revenues when realization is probable and the amount can be reliably
estimated.
Unbilled
construction receivables represent reimbursable costs and amounts earned under
contracts in progress as of the date of our balance sheet. Such amounts become
billable according to contract terms, which usually consider the passage of
time, achievement of certain milestones or completion of the project. Advance
billings represent billings to or collections from clients on contracts in
advance of revenues earned thereon. Unbilled construction receivables are
generally billed and collected within the 12 months following the date of our
balance sheet, and advance billings are generally earned within the 12 months
following the date of our balance sheet.
Securities
commission income is recognized as units of our merchant development funds are
sold through AmREIT Securities Company. Securities commission income is earned
as the services are performed and pursuant to the corresponding prospectus or
private offering memorandum. Generally, it includes a selling commission of
between 6.5% and 7.5%, a dealer manager fee of between 2.5% and 3.25% and
offering and organizational costs of 1.0% to 1.50%. The selling commission is
then paid out to the unaffiliated selling broker-dealer and reflected as
securities commission expense.
Real Estate Valuation
— Land, buildings and improvements are recorded at cost. Expenditures related to
the development of real estate are carried at cost which includes capitalized
carrying charges, acquisition costs and development costs. Carrying charges,
primarily interest and loan acquisition costs, and direct and indirect
development costs related to buildings under construction are capitalized as
part of construction in progress. The capitalization of such costs ceases at the
earlier of one year from the date of completion of major construction or when
the property, or any completed portion, becomes available for
occupancy. We capitalize acquisition
costs as incurred. Such costs are expensed if and when the acquisition becomes
no longer probable. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over an estimated useful life of up to 50 years for buildings, up to
20 years for site improvements and over the life of lease for tenant
improvements. Leasehold estate properties, where the Company owns the building
and improvements but not the related ground, are amortized over the life of the
lease.
We review
our properties for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the assets, including accrued rental
income, may not be recoverable through operations. We determine whether an
impairment in value occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the
property, with the carrying value of the individual property. If impairment is
indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of
the asset exceeds its fair value.
Valuation of
Receivables — An allowance for the uncollectible portion of tenant
receivables and accounts receivable is determined based upon an analysis of
balances outstanding, historical payment history, tenant credit worthiness,
additional guarantees and other economic trends. Balances outstanding include
base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributed to the accrual of
straight line rents. Additionally, estimates of the expected recovery of
pre-petition and post-petition claims with respect to tenants in bankruptcy are
considered in assessing the collectibility of the related
receivables.
Real Estate
Acquisitions — We account for real estate acquisitions pursuant to
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141”). Accordingly, we allocate the purchase price of the acquired
properties to land, building and improvements, identifiable intangible assets
and to the acquired liabilities based on their respective fair values.
Identifiable intangibles include amounts allocated to acquired out-of-market
leases, the value of in-place leases and customer relationships, if any. We
determine fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize
appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information.
Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the
historical operating results, known trends and specific market and economic
conditions that may affect the property. Factors considered by management in our
analysis of determining the as-if-vacant property value include an estimate of
carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering market
conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs,
management includes real estate taxes, insurance and estimates of lost rentals
at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, tenant demand and other
economic conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases
including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related
expenses. Intangibles related to out-of-market leases and in-place lease value
are recorded as acquired lease intangibles and are amortized as an adjustment to
rental revenue or amortization expense, as appropriate, over the remaining terms
of the underlying leases. Premiums or discounts on acquired out-of-market debt
are amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of such
debt.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
157, Fair Value
Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires
companies to disclose the fair value of financial instruments according to a
fair value hierarchy. Additionally, companies are required to provide
certain disclosures regarding instruments within the hierarchy, including a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for each major category of
assets and liabilities. SAFS No. 157 is effective for our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have
a material effect on our results of operations or financial
position.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 expands
opportunities to use fair value measurement in financial reporting and permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We did not measure any eligible financial assets and
liabilities at fair value under the provisions of SFAS No. 159.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141R”). SFAS
No. 141R will change the accounting for business combinations. Under FAS 141R,
an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with
limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We
are currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 141R on our financial
position and results of operations beginning for fiscal year 2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS
No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards
for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity
in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 is effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of
the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests.
All other requirements of SFAS No. 160 shall be applied prospectively. We
are currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No.
160 on our consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $468,000
and $1.2 million, respectively. Cash flows provided by (used in) operating
activities, investing activities and financing activities for the three months
ended March 31, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
$ |
2,222 |
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
Investing
activities
|
|
$ |
(3,929 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,196 |
) |
Financing
activities
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
|
$ |
14,127 |
|
Cash
flows from operating activities and financing activities have been the principal
sources of capital to fund our ongoing operations and dividends. Our cash on
hand, internally-generated cash flow, borrowings under our existing credit
facilities, issuance of equity securities, as well as the placement of secured
debt and other equity alternatives, are expected to provide the necessary
capital to maintain and operate our properties as well as execute our growth
strategies.
Additionally,
as part of our investment strategy, we constantly evaluate our property
portfolio, systematically selling off any non-core or underperforming assets and
replacing them with Irreplaceable Corners and other core assets. We anticipate
that we will continue to increase our operating cash flow by selling any
underperforming assets and deploying the capital generated into high-quality
income-producing retail real estate assets. Since January 2004, we have executed
this strategy through the acquisition of $143 million of shopping centers,
consisting primarily of four premier properties with approximately 289,000
square feet.
Cash
provided by operating activities as reported in the consolidated statements of
cash flows increased by approximately $1.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 period when compared to the comparable prior year period. This
net increase is attributable to a $2.7 million increase in working capital cash
flow during the first quarter of 2008 which was partially offset by a $1.4
million reduction in proceeds from sales of real estate acquired for
resale. The increase in working capital cash flow was driven
primarily by a $2.7 million reduction in cash outflows during the three months
ended March 31, 2008 period compared to the comparable prior year period related
to the timing of our property tax payments. Additionally, during 2007, we had
net cash inflows of $1.4 million related to the sale of one of our non-core
single-tenant assets. We had no such sales during the first quarter
of 2008.
Cash
provided by investing activities as reported in the consolidated statements of
cash flows decreased by approximately $7.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 period when compared to the comparable prior year period. This
decrease is attributable to a $9.2 million decrease in property acquisitions
during the first quarter of 2008, couple with an increase in payments from
affiliates of $3.1 million during the period. These increases were
partially offset by a $5.1 million increase in investments
made in affiliates during the first quarter of 2008. We made no
property acquisitions during the first quarter of 2008. However, in
February 2007, we acquired The Woodlands Mall Ring Road property, which
represents 66,000 square feet of gross leaseable area in Houston,
Texas. The property has been ground-leased to five tenants, including
NationsBank, Circuit City and Landry’s Seafood. With respect to loans and
payments from affiliates, we have the ability as part of our treasury management
function to place excess cash in short term bridge loans for our merchant
development funds for the purpose of acquiring or developing properties. We
typically provide such financing to our affiliates as a way of efficiently
deploying our excess cash and earning a higher return than we would in other
short term investments or overnight funds. In most cases, the funds have a
construction lender in place, and we simply step in as the lender and provide
financing on the same terms as the third party lender. In so doing, we are able
to access these funds as needed by having our affiliate then draw down on their
construction loans. These loans are unsecured, bear a market rate of interest
and are due upon demand. With respect to investments made in
affiliates, we made an investment during the first quarter of 2008 in Shadow
Creek Ranch Shopping Center through a joint venture with an institutional
partner. Shadow Creek Ranch Shopping Center is a 616,372 square foot
grocery-anchored shopping center located in Pearland, Texas.
Cash
flows provided by financing activities decreased from $14.1 million during
three months ended March 31, 2008 to $955,000 during the comparable prior year
period. This $13.2 million decrease was primarily the result of the reduction of
$12.2 million in net proceeds from notes payable. During first
quarter of 2007, we generated proceeds from the financing of our Uptown Dallas
property while no such financings were done during the first quarter of
2008. This reduction in proceeds was coupled with an increase in
treasury share repurchases of $1.1 million pursuant to the share repurchase
program which was approved in June 2007.
We have
an unsecured credit facility in place which is being used to provide funds for
the acquisition of properties and working capital. The credit facility matures
in October 2009 and provides that we may borrow up to $70 million subject to the
value of unencumbered assets. Effective October 2007, we renewed our
credit facility on terms which provided us with an increased borrowing base at
reduced borrowing costs. All other conditions remained substantially the same as
the previous facility. The credit facility contains covenants which,
among other restrictions, require us to maintain a minimum net worth, a maximum
leverage ratio, maximum tenant concentration ratios, specified interest coverage
and fixed charge coverage ratios and allow the lender to approve all
distributions. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we violated two covenants
per the terms of the credit facility. Our lender has waived both
events of non-compliance as of March 31, 2008. We were in compliance
with all other covenants as of March 31, 2008. The credit facility’s annual
interest rate varies depending upon our debt to asset ratio, from LIBOR plus a
spread of 1.0% to LIBOR plus a spread of 1.85%. As of March 31, 2008,
the interest rate was LIBOR plus 1.00%. As of March 31, 2008, there
was $36.1 million outstanding on the credit facility. As of March 31,
2008, we have approximately $31.9 million available under our line of credit,
subject to the covenant provisions discussed above. In addition to
the credit facility, we utilize various permanent mortgage financing and other
debt instruments.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, we declared dividends to our shareholders
of $3.3 million, compared with $3.5 million in the three months ended March 31,
2007. The class A, C and D shareholders receive monthly dividends and
the class B shareholders receive quarterly dividends. All dividends
are declared on a quarterly basis. The dividends by
class are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Class C
|
|
|
Class D
|
|
2008
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
723 |
|
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
1,097
|
* |
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
1,786 |
|
*-
Includes a $933,000 redemption premium associated with the redemption of the
remaining class B shares in December 2007.
Until we
acquire properties, we use our funds to pay down outstanding debt under the
credit facility. Thereafter, any excess cash is provided first to our
affiliates in the form of short-term bridge financing for development or
acquisition of properties and then is invested in short-term investments or
overnight funds. This investment strategy allows us to manage
our interest costs and provides us with the liquidity to acquire properties at
such time as those suitable for acquisition are located.
Inflation
has had very little effect on our income from operations. We expect that
increases in store sales revenues due to inflation, as well as increases in the
Consumer Price Index, may contribute to capital appreciation of our properties.
These factors, however, also may have an adverse impact on the operating margins
of the tenants of the properties.
In June
2007, our Board of Trust Managers authorized a common share repurchase program
as part of our ongoing investment strategy. Under the terms of the program, we
may purchase up to a maximum value of $5 million of our class A common shares of
beneficial interest. Share repurchases may be made in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions at the discretion of management and as market
conditions warrant. We anticipate funding the repurchase of shares
primarily through the proceeds received from general corporate funds as well as
through the use of our credit facility.
Repurchases
of our common shares of beneficial interest for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
are as follows:
Period
|
(a)
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
(c)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
As
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
|
(d)
Maximum
Dollar
Value
of Shares that
May
Yet be Purchased
Under
the Program
|
January
1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
|
156,490
|
$6.99
|
156,490
|
$2,618,707
|
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the three months ended March 31, 2008 to the three months ended March 31,
2007
Revenues
Total
revenues increased by $802,000, or 7%, for the three months ended March 31,
2008 as compared to the comparable prior year period ($11.6 million in 2008
versus $10.8 million in 2007). This increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in rental income, construction revenues and real
estate fees, offset by a decrease in securities commission income.
Rental
income increased by $619,000, or 9%, for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to the comparable prior year period. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in occupancy and an increase in tenant
reimbursements of taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance.
Construction
revenues, which were generated by AmREIT Construction Company (“ACC”), were
$1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $973,000 for
the comparable prior year period. Such revenues have been recognized
under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. This
increase in revenues is primarily attributable to an increase in third party
work.
Real
estate fee income increased approximately $195,000, or 14%, for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year period primarily as a
result of an increase in acquisition fees earned on property transactions within
our merchant development funds.
Securities
commission revenue decreased by $468,000, or 47%, in for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year period. This decrease in commission
revenue was driven by a decrease in capital-raising activities of our
advisory/sponsorship business. During the first quarter of 2008, we
raised $4.8 million in capital for one of our merchant development funds, AmREIT
Monthly Income and Growth Fund IV, L.P. (“MIG IV”) as compared to $9.2 million
in capital that we raised for MIG IV during the first quarter of
2007. This decrease in commission income was partially offset by a
corresponding decrease in commission expense paid to other third party
broker-dealer firms. As we raise capital for our affiliated merchant development
partnerships, we earn a securities commission of approximately 11% of the money
raised. These commission revenues are then offset by commission payments to
non-affiliated broker-dealers of between 8% and 9%.
Expenses
Total
operating expenses increased by $210,000, or 3%, in for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily
attributable to decreases in real estate commissions and securities commissions,
which were offset by an increase in construction costs and general and
administrative expenses.
Real
estate commission expense decreased from $421,000 in 2007 to $37,000 in 2008,
primarily as a result of decreased brokerage activity.
Securities
commission expense decreased by $344,000, or 42%, in for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year period. This decrease is
attributable to decreased capital-raising activity through ASC during 2008 as
discussed in “Revenues”
above.
ACC
recognized $1.1 million in construction costs during 2008, compared to $861,000
in 2007. This increase in construction costs is consistent with the
increase in revenues described above.
General
and administrative expense increased by $270,000, or 13%, in for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year period. This increase
is primarily due to increases in personnel.
Other
Interest
expense increased by $341,000, or 16%, in for the three months ended March 31,
2008 as compared to the prior year period. The increase in interest
expense is primarily attributable to draw-downs on our credit facility after the
first quarter of 2007 related to the tender of the class B common shares and our
investment in Borders and Woodlake Square.
Loss from
merchant development funds and other affiliates increased by $131,000, in for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year
period. The increase is mainly due to $96,000 of losses that we
recognized related to our 30% limited partner interest in AmREIT Woodlake,
LP.
Income
from discontinued operations decreased by $88,000, or 55%, to $72,000 in 2008.
The decrease is primarily attributed to an increase in expenses.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of
March 31, 2008, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual
Obligations
Our
material contractual obligations are summarized and included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, there have been no material changes outside of the
ordinary course of business in the contractual obligations specified in our 2007
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Funds
From Operations
We
consider funds from operations (“FFO”), a non-GAAP measure, to be an appropriate
measure of the operating performance of an equity REIT. The National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as net
income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from
sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures. In addition, NAREIT recommends that extraordinary items not
be considered in arriving at FFO. We calculate our FFO in accordance with this
definition. Most industry analysts and equity REITs, including us,
consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance
because, by excluding gains or losses on dispositions and excluding
depreciation, FFO is a helpful tool that can assist in the comparison of the
operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods, or as compared
to different companies. Management uses FFO as a supplemental measure
to conduct and evaluate our business because there are certain limitations
associated with using GAAP net income by itself as the primary measure of our
operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate
assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate
assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management
believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies
that uses historical cost accounting is insufficient by itself. There
can be no assurance that FFO presented by us is comparable to similarly titled
measures of other REITs. FFO should not be considered as an
alternative to net income or other measurements under GAAP as an indicator of
our operating performance or to cash flows from operating, investing or
financing activities as a measure of liquidity.
Below is
the calculation of FFO and the reconciliation to net income, which we believe is
the most comparable GAAP financial measure to FFO, in thousands:
|
|
Three
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Income
- before discontinued operations
|
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
Income -
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus
depreciation of real estate assets - from operations
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
Plus
depreciation of real estate assets - from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
for nonconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Less
class B, C & D distributions
|
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
(2,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Funds From Operations available to class A shareholders
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are
exposed to interest-rate changes primarily related to the variable interest rate
on our credit facility and related to the refinancing of long-term debt which
currently contains fixed interest rates. Our interest
rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes
on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing
costs. To achieve this objective, we borrow primarily at fixed
interest rates. We currently do not use interest-rate swaps or any
other derivative financial instruments as part of our interest-rate risk
management approach.
As of
March 31, 2008, the carrying value of our debt obligations associated with
assets held for investment was $173.9 million, $137.9 million of which
represented fixed rate obligations with an estimated fair value of
$145 million. As of March 31, 2008, the carrying value of our
debt obligations associated with assets held for sale was $12.7 million,
all of which represented fixed rate obligations with an estimated fair value of
$13.8 million. The remaining $36.1 million of our debt
obligations have a variable interest rate. Such debt has market-based
terms, and its carrying value is therefore representative of its fair value as
of March 31, 2008. In the event interest rates were to increase 100
basis points, annual net income, FFO and future cash flows would decrease by
$361,000 based on the variable-rate debt outstanding at March 31,
2008.
As of
December 31, 2007, the carrying value of our debt obligations associated with
assets held for investment was $168.6 million, $138.1 million of which
represented fixed rate obligations with an estimated fair value of
$139.1 million
The
discussion above considers only those exposures that exist as of March 31,
2008. It therefore does not consider any exposures or positions that
could arise after that date. As a result, the ultimate impact to us
of interest-rate fluctuations will depend upon the exposures that arise during
the period, any hedging strategies in place at that time and actual interest
rates.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of March 31,
2008. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,
2008.
Changes
in Internal Controls
There has
been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
We are
not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
See our
filing on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC,
for a full discussion of risk factors associated with ownership of our common
shares. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we had no material changes in
these risk factors.
In June
2007, our Board of Trust Managers authorized our common share repurchase program
as part of our ongoing investment strategy. Under the terms of the program, we
may purchase up to a maximum value of $5 million of our class A common shares of
beneficial interest. Share repurchases may be made in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions at the discretion of management and as market
conditions warrant.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased common shares of beneficial
interest as follows:
Period
|
(a)
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
(c)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
As
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
|
(d)
Maximum
Dollar
Value
of Shares that
May
Yet be Purchased
Under
the Program (1)
|
January
1, 2008 to January 31, 2008
|
35,000
|
$7.11
|
35,000
|
$3,454,299
|
February
1, 2008 to February 29, 2008
|
109,290
|
$6.96
|
109,290
|
$2,703,392
|
March
1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
|
12,200
|
$6.94
|
12,200
|
$2,618,707
|
(1) A
description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our
share repurchase program is included in the narrative preceding this
table.
None.
None.
None.
The
exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this
report) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this report.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf on the 12th of May,
2008 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AmREIT
/s/ H. Kerr
Taylor
H. Kerr Taylor, President and Chief
Executive Officer
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ H. Kerr
Taylor
H.
KERR TAYLOR
President,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer
and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
May
12, 2008
|
/s/ Robert S.
Cartwright,
Jr.
ROBERT
S. CARTWRIGHT, JR., Trust Manager
|
May
12, 2008
|
/s/ G. Steven
Dawson
G.
STEVEN DAWSON, Trust Manager
|
May
12, 2008
|
/s/ Philip W.
Taggart
PHILIP
W. TAGGART, Trust Manager
|
May
12, 2008
|
/s/ H.L. Rush,
Jr.
H.L.
RUSH, JR., Trust Manager
|
May
12, 2008
|
/s/ Brett P.
Treadwell
BRETT
P. TREADWELL, Managing Vice President, Finance
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
May
12, 2008
|