Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  [ X ] Yes        No

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer [ X ]

SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I: Item 1: Consolidated Financial Statements

SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2007 AND JUNE 30, 2006

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006 (Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006 (Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all material adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2006, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. For additional information, refer to the Company's June 30, 2006, Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC and the Company's annual report, which contains the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Southern Missouri Bank & Trust Co. (SMBT or Bank). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Note 2: Securities

Available for sale securities are summarized as follows at estimated fair value:

The following table shows our investments' gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2007.

The following table shows our investments' gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2006.

Note 3: Loans

Loans are summarized as follows:

Note 4: Deposits

Deposits are summarized as follows:

Note 5: Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share are based upon the weighted-average shares outstanding. The following table summarizes basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

Note 6: Stock Option Plans

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment," which requires the compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in financial statements. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued. Compensation cost is recognized over the vesting period during which an employee provides service in exchange for the award. SFAS No. 123R was adopted during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.

Note 7: Employee Stock Ownership Plan

The Bank established a tax-qualified ESOP in April 1994. The plan covers substantially all employees who have attained the age of 21 and completed one year of service. The Company's intent is to continue the ESOP for fiscal 2007. The Company has been accruing $16,000 per month for ESOP expenses during this fiscal year and, consistent with last fiscal year, has announced its intention to purchase shares for distribution to participants in late fiscal 2007.

Note 8: Corporate Obligated Floating Rate Trust Preferred Securities

Southern Missouri Statutory Trust I issued $7.0 million of Floating Rate Capital Securities (the "Trust Preferred Securities") in March, 2004, with a liquidation value of $1,000 per share. The securities are due in 30 years, redeemable after five years and bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR. The securities represent undivided beneficial interests in the trust, which was established by the Company for the purpose of issuing the securities. The Trust Preferred Securities were sold in a private transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act") and have not been registered under the Act. The securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements.

Southern Missouri Statutory Trust I used the proceeds from the sale of the Trust Preferred Securities to purchase Junior Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The Company has used its net proceeds for working capital and investment in its subsidiaries.

Note 9: Authorized Share Repurchase Program

In April 2004, the Board of Directors authorized and announced the open-market stock repurchase of up to 115,000 shares of the Company's outstanding stock. As of March 31, 2007, a total of 88,645 shares have been repurchased. The number of shares, as of March 31, 2007, held as treasury stock was 720,895.

PART I: Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.

General

Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. (Southern Missouri or Company) is a Missouri corporation and owns all of the outstanding stock of Southern Missouri Bank & Trust Co. (SMBT or the Bank). The Company's earnings are primarily dependent on the operations of the Bank. As a result, the following discussion relates primarily to the operations of the Bank. The Bank's deposit accounts are generally insured up to a maximum of $100,000 (certain retirement accounts are insured up to $250,000) by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), which is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Bank currently conducts its business through its home office located in Poplar Bluff and eight full service branch facilities in Poplar Bluff, Van Buren, Dexter, Kennett, Doniphan, Sikeston, and Qulin, Missouri.

The significant accounting policies followed by Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary for interim financial reporting are consistent with the accounting policies followed for annual financial reporting. All adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature and are in the opinion of management necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods reported, have been included in the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements.

The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2006, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company's annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The following discussion reviews the Company's consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2007, and the results of operations for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Forward Looking Statements

This document, including information incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements about the Company and its subsidiaries which we believe are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements with respect to anticipated future operating and financial performance, growth opportunities, interest rates, cost savings and funding advantages expected or anticipated to be realized by management. Words such as "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan" and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements by the Company and its management are based on beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions of management and are not guarantees of future performance. The important factors we discuss below, as well as other factors discussed under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and identified in our filings with the SEC and those presented elsewhere by our management from time to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this document:

• the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations;
• the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board;
• inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;
• the timely development of and acceptance of our new products and services and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors' products and services;
• the willingness of users to substitute our products and services for products and services of our competitors;
• the impact of changes in financial services' laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance);
• the impact of technological changes;
• acquisitions;
• changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and
• our success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise.

Critical Accounting Policies

Generally accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to apply significant judgments to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Management of the Company must use assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurement is not possible or practical. For a complete discussion of the Company's significant accounting policies, see "Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" in the Company's 2006 Annual Report. Certain policies are considered critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such estimates may have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management has reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. For a discussion of applying critical accounting policies, see "Critical Accounting Policies" beginning on page 11 in the Company's 2006 Annual Report.

Executive Summary

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest margin, which is directly impacted by the interest rate environment. The net interest margin is the difference between the average yield earned on average interest-earning assets, primarily mortgage loans, commercial loans and the investment portfolio, and the average rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities, primarily certificates of deposit, savings, interest-bearing demand accounts and borrowed funds. Net interest margin is directly impacted by the spread between long-term interest rates and short-term interest rates, as our interest-earning assets, particularly those with initial terms to maturity or repricing greater than one year, generally price off longer term rates while our interest-bearing liabilities generally price off shorter term interest rates.

Our net interest income is also impacted by the shape of the market yield curve. A steep yield curve - in which the difference in interest rates between short term and long term periods is relatively large - could be beneficial to our net interest income, as the interest rate spread between our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities would be larger. Conversely, a flat or flattening yield curve, in which the difference in rates between short term and long term periods is relatively small or shrinking, or an inverted yield curve, in which short term rates exceed long term rates, could have an adverse impact on our net interest income, as our interest rate spread could decrease.

Our results of operations may also be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, particularly those with respect to changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

During the first nine months of fiscal 2007, we grew our balance sheet by $18.0 million, which was consistent with the growth initiatives we have employed during recent periods. This additional growth reflected a $20.5 million increase in total net loans, a $2.0 million decrease in securities available for sale, a $7.7 million decrease in deposits, and a $20.6 million increase in borrowed funds. The growth in loans was primarily due to commercial real estate loan and commercial loan originations and advances on available lines of credit. At the present time, management expects that loan growth for the current fiscal year will be near the high end of the range of loan growth experienced over the last five years. The decrease in deposits was the result of the net maturity of $13.5 million in brokered deposits, partially offset by a $5.8 million increase in retail deposits. The increase in borrowed funds (all from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, or FHLB) was comprised of $17.6 million in short-term borrowings and $10.0 million in long-term callable advances, offset by the maturity or early redemption of $7.0 million in existing long-term borrowings.

Our net income for the third quarter of 2007 increased 1.1% to $652,000, as compared to $645,000 earned during the same period of the prior year. Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 were $0.29, as compared to $0.28 for the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily due to a 2.1% increase in net interest income and a 6.3% decrease in income tax provisions, partially offset by a 3.1% increase in non-interest expense. For the first nine months of fiscal 2007, net income increased 5.5% to $2.12 million, as compared to $2.01 million earned during the same period of the prior year. Diluted earnings per share for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 were $0.93, as compared to $0.88 for the same period of the prior year. The increase in net income was primarily due to a 3.9% increase in net interest income and a 4.0% increase in non-interest income, partially offset by a 3.7% increase in non-interest expense.

Short-term market interest rates were relatively steady during the first nine months of fiscal 2007, following increases during the previous two fiscal years. The Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank increased the overnight lending rate 25 basis points at each of the regularly scheduled meetings from June 2004 to June 2006, and held the rate steady at each of its six meetings since, at the current rate of 5.25%. Intermediate- and long-term market interest rates have decreased from 60 to 70 basis points during the first nine months of fiscal 2007. The result was a continued inversion of the yield curve during the first nine months of fiscal 2007. In this rate environment, our net interest margin was relatively steady, while our

interest rate spread decreased nine basis points when comparing the first nine months of fiscal 2007 with the corresponding period in 2006, as our interest income, in general, is reflective of long-term rates, while our interest expense, in general, is reflective of short-term rates. The $278,000 increase in net interest income for the first nine months of fiscal 2007, when compared to the corresponding period in 2006, reflected growth of 5.1% in our average interest-earning assets, compared to the prior period, and was offset by our nine basis point decline in interest rate spread, from 2.66% in the prior period, to 2.57% in the current period.

The Company's net income is also affected by the level of non-interest income and operating expenses. Non-interest income consists primarily of service charges, ATM and loan fees, and other general operating income. Operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy-related expenses, postage, insurance, advertising, professional fees, office expenses, and other general operating expenses. In the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same periods of the prior year, non-interest income increased 2.2% and 4.0%, respectively, primarily due to increased income from ATM and debit card transactions, secondary market loan origination income, and other miscellaneous fee income, and partially offset by reduced non sufficient funds (NSF) income. In the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, compared to the same periods of the prior year, non-interest expense increased 3.1% and 3.7%, respectively, primarily in the categories of compensation and benefits, and advertising, both of which are partially related to the Company's opening of a new banking facility in January 2006. Absent the non-interest expenses attributed to that location, non-interest expense in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 would have increased just 0.2% compared to the same period of the prior year.

Management plans to continue to grow our assets through the origination and occasional purchase of loans and investment securities. The primary funding for our asset growth is expected to come from retail deposits, short- and long-term FHLB borrowings, and brokered certificates of deposit. We intend to grow deposits by offering desirable deposit products for our existing customers and by attracting new depository relationships. We will continue to explore branch expansion opportunities in market areas that we believe present attractive opportunities for our strategic business model.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2007, and June 30, 2006

The Company's total assets increased by $18.0 million, or 5.1%, to $368.7 million at March 31, 2007, as compared to $350.7 million at June 30, 2006. Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased $20.5 million, or 7.3%, to $301.5 million, as compared to $280.9 million at June 30, 2006. The Company continues to focus on the origination of commercial and commercial real estate loans, resulting in growth of $7.5 million and $10.4 million, respectively, in these balances.

Asset growth during the first nine months of fiscal 2007 has been funded primarily with long- and short-term FHLB borrowings, and retail deposit growth. The Company used $10.0 million in new long-term, callable FHLB advances, $17.6 million in new short-term FHLB borrowings, and $5.8 million in retail deposit growth, to replace $7.0 million in term FHLB advances that were called or matured during the first nine months of the fiscal year; to replace net maturities of $13.5 million in brokered deposits; and to provide $12.9 million in funding for loan growth. Outstanding FHLB advances totaled $66.6 million at March 31, 2007, up $20.6 million, or 44.7%, compared to $46.0 million at June 30, 2006. At March 31, 2007, short-term advances totaled $17.6 million. The Company had no short-term advances outstanding at June 30, 2006. The Company had $0.1 million in brokered deposits outstanding at March 31, 2007, compared to $13.6 million at June 30, 2006. The Company has shifted funding sources due to better pricing available over the last nine months in FHLB advances. Retail (non-brokered) deposits totaled $250.3 million at March 31, 2007, up $5.8 million as compared to $244.5 million at June 30, 2006. The fiscal year 2007 increase in retail deposits was primarily due to an $11.9 million increase in retail CDs, offset by a $3.7 million decrease in money market passbook deposits, and a $2.4 million decrease in money market deposit accounts. The shift to CDs is attributed to current customer preferences for earnings over liquidity. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased $2.5 million, to $13.8 million at March 31, 2007, compared to $11.3 million at June 30, 2006. The increase was attributed primarily to normal balance fluctuations with customers holding the agreements.

Total stockholders' equity increased $2.0 million, or 7.7%, to $28.6 million at March 31, 2007, as compared to $26.6 million at June 30, 2006. The increase was primarily due to retention of net income and an increase in the market value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio, partially offset by cash dividends paid.

Average Balance Sheet for the Three And Nine-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006

The tables on the this and the following page present certain information regarding Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.'s financial condition and net interest income for the three- and nine-month periods ending March 31, 2007 and 2006. The tables present the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. Yields on tax-exempt obligations were not computed on a tax equivalent basis.

Results of Operations - Comparison of the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006

General. Net income for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, was $652,000 and $2.12 million, respectively, an increase of $7,000, or 1.0%, and $110,000, or 5.5%, as compared to net income of $645,000 and $2.01 million, respectively, earned during the same periods of the prior year. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.29 for the third quarter of fiscal 2007, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.29 and $0.28, respectively, for the same period of the prior year. For the first nine months of fiscal 2007, basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.95 and $0.93, respectively, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.90 and $0.88, respectively, for the same period of the prior year. Our annualized return on average assets for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, was .71% and .78%, respectively, compared to .73% and .78%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year. Our annualized return on average stockholders' equity for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, was 9.22% and 10.20%, respectively, compared to 9.94% and 10.46%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, increased $50,000, or 2.1%, and $278,000, or 3.9%, respectively, as compared to the same periods of the prior year. These increases primarily reflected our growth initiatives that resulted in increases in the average balances of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for both the three- and nine-month periods, and was partially offset by a decrease in our net interest rate spread for both the three- and nine-month periods. Our net interest rate spread for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, was 2.51% and 2.57%, respectively, both compressed when compared to net interest rate spreads of 2.65% and 2.66%, respectively, earned for the comparable periods of the prior year. For the three- and nine-month periods ending March 31, 2007, our net interest margin, determined by dividing annualized net interest income by total average interest-earning assets, was 2.83%, and 2.89%, respectively, both down compared to net interest margin of 2.92% earned during both of the same periods of the prior year. The decrease in net interest rate spread for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, resulted from respective 68 and 76 basis point increases in the weighted-average cost of funds, partially offset by respective 54 and 67 basis point increases in the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets. Net interest rate spread compression during the last twelve months was attributed to repricing of liabilities at relatively higher short-term rates, while assets repriced at a slower pace and based on relatively lower longer-term interest rates. The Company notes that spread compression is primarily the result of the inverted interest rate yield curve, and is currently more pronounced due to loan demand that has exceeded deposit growth, which required the Company to obtain higher-cost funding; however, the Company's focus during the last several fiscal years on origination of commercial and commercial real estate loans (which generally carry a higher yield and have more favorable repricing characteristics, compared to our 1-4 family residential loan portfolio) likely reduced overall spread compression.

Interest Income. Total interest income for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, increased $732,000, or 14.1%, and $2.5 million, or 16.4%, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year, due to growth of $16.8 million and $16.5 million, respectively, in the average balance of interest-earning assets, and increases of 54 and 66 basis points, respectively, in the yield earned on those assets. For the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, the average interest rate on interest-earning assets was 6.83% and 6.84%, respectively, as compared to average interest rates of 6.29% and 6.17%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, increased $683,000, or 24.5%, and $2.2 million, or 27.7%, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year, due to growth of $15.1 million and $14.8 million, respectively, in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, and increases of 68 and 76 basis points, respectively, in the weighted-average cost of funds. For the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, the average interest rate on interest-bearing liabilities was 4.32% and 4.27%, respectively, as compared to average interest rates of 3.64% and 3.51%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, was $100,000 and $320,000, respectively, as compared to $80,000 and $285,000, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year. The Company's recent growth in its commercial and commercial real estate loan balances has required increased provisions for loan losses, as those loan types generally carry additional risk. Although we believe that we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, additions will be necessary as the loan portfolio grows, as economic conditions change, and as other conditions differ from the current operating environment. Additionally, though we use the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. (See "Critical Accounting Policies", "Allowance for Loan Loss Activity" and "Nonperforming Assets").

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, increased $11,000, or 2.2%, and $64,000, or 4.0%, as compared to the same periods of the prior year. The increases were primarily due to increased income from ATM and debit card transactions, secondary market loan originations, and other miscellaneous fees.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, increased $56,000, or 3.1%, and $195,000, or 3.7%, respectively, as compared to the same periods of the prior year. The increases were primarily due to increased salaries and benefits and advertising expenses. The Company opened a new banking facility in January 2006. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2007, non-interest expense attributable to that location totaled $328,000, compared to $140,000 for the same period of the prior year. Absent the increase in those costs, non-interest expense in the nine-month period would have increased 0.2%, as compared to the same period of the prior year. As the Company continues to grow its balance sheet, the amount of non-interest expense is expected to increase due to compensation, expenses related to expansion, and inflation. Our efficiency ratio, determined by dividing total non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, was 63.6% and 61.0%, respectively, for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, as compared to 63.0% and 61.1%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year.

Income Taxes. Provisions for income taxes for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, decreased $22,000, or 6.3%, to $330,000, as compared to $352,000 for the same period of the prior year. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2007, provisions for income taxes increased $1,000, or 0.1%, essentially unchanged at $1.1 million. Our effective tax rate for the three- and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2007, was 33.6% and 33.7%, respectively, as compared to 35.3% and 34.9%, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the three-month and nine-month periods was primarily due to the recognition of benefits resulting from tax credit acquisitions and an increase in the amount of tax-exempt income.

Allowance for Loan Loss Activity

The Company regularly reviews its allowance for loan losses and makes adjustments to its balance based on management's analysis of the loan portfolio, the amount of non-performing and classified assets, as well as general economic conditions. Although the Company maintains its allowance for loan losses at a level that it considers sufficient to provide for losses, there can be no assurance that future losses will not exceed internal estimates. In addition, the amount of the allowance for loan losses is subject to review by regulatory agencies, which can order the establishment of additional loss provisions. The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses over the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:

The allowance for loan losses has been calculated based upon an evaluation of pertinent factors underlying the various types and quality of the Company's loans. Management considers such factors as the repayment status of a loan, the estimated net fair value of the underlying collateral, the borrower's intent and ability to repay the loan, local economic conditions, and the Company's historical loss ratios. We maintain the allowance for loan losses through the provisions for loan losses that we charge to income. We charge losses on loans against the allowance for loan losses when we believe the collection of loan principal is unlikely. The allowance for loan losses increased $226,000 to $2.3 million at March 31, 2007, from $2.1 million at June 30, 2006. At March 31, 2007, the Bank had $1.2 million, or 0.31% of total assets, adversely classified (all substandard), as compared to adversely classified assets of $403,000, or 0.11% of assets, at March 31, 2006.

While management believes that our asset quality remains strong, it recognizes that, due to the continued growth in the loan portfolio and potential changes in market conditions, our level of nonperforming assets and resulting charge offs may fluctuate. Higher levels of net charge offs requiring additional provisions for loan losses could result. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.

Nonperforming Assets

The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets and non-performing loans to net loans receivable is another measure of asset quality. Nonperforming assets of the Company include nonaccruing loans, accruing loans delinquent/past maturity 90 days or more, and assets which have been acquired as a result of foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The following table summarizes changes in the Company's level of nonperforming assets at selected dates:

Liquidity Resources

The term "liquidity" refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan originations, loans purchases, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses. Our primary sources of funds include deposit growth, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances, brokered deposits, amortization and prepayment of loan principal and interest, investment maturities and sales, and funds provided by our operations. While the scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows, FHLB advance redemptions, and loan and security prepayment rates are significantly influenced by factors outside of the Bank's control, including interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. The Bank relies on FHLB advances, repurchase agreements, and brokered deposits as additional sources for funding cash or liquidity needs.

The Company uses its liquid resources principally to satisfy its ongoing cash requirements, which include funding loan commitments, funding maturing certificates of deposit and deposit withdrawals, maintaining liquidity, funding maturing or called FHLB advances, purchasing investments, and meeting operating expenses. At March 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding commitments to fund approximately $36.9 million in mortgage and non-mortgage loans. These commitments are expected to be funded through existing cash balances, cash flow from normal operations and, if needed, FHLB advances. At March 31, 2007, the Bank had pledged its residential real estate loan portfolio with the FHLB with available credit of approximately $96.6 million, of which $66.6 million had been advanced. In addition, the Bank has the ability to pledge several of its other loan portfolios, including commercial real estate, home equity, and commercial business loans, which could provide additional borrowing capacity of approximately $80.4 million at March 31, 2007. Along with the ability to borrow from the FHLB, management believes its liquid resources will be sufficient to meet the Company's liquidity needs.

Regulatory Capital

The Bank is subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements pursuant to regulations adopted by the federal banking agencies. The requirements address both risk-based capital and leverage capital. As of March 31, 2007, and June 30, 2006, the Bank met all applicable adequacy requirements.

The FDIC has in place qualifications for banks to be classified as "well-capitalized." As of March 31, 2007, the most recent notification from the Missouri Division of Finance categorized the Bank as "well-capitalized." There were no conditions or events since the Missouri Division of Finance notification that has changed the Bank's classification.

The Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the tables on the following page.

PART I: Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

The goal of the Company's asset/liability management strategy is to manage the interest rate sensitivity of both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in order to maximize net interest income without exposing the Bank to an excessive level of interest rate risk. The Company employs various strategies intended to manage the potential effect that changing interest rates may have on future operating results. The primary asset/liability management strategy has been to focus on matching the anticipated repricing intervals of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. At times, however, depending on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long- and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the Company may determine to increase its interest rate risk position somewhat in order to maintain its net interest margin.

In an effort to manage the interest rate risk resulting from fixed rate lending, the Bank has utilized longer term FHLB advances (maturities up to ten years), subject to early redemption and fixed terms. Other elements of the Company's current asset/liability strategy include: (i) increasing originations of commercial real estate and commercial business loans, which typically provide higher yields and shorter repricing periods, but inherently increased credit risk; (ii) increasing loans receivable through the origination of adjustable-rate residential loans, (iii) limiting the price volatility of the investment portfolio by maintaining a weighted average maturity of less than five years, (iv) actively soliciting less rate-sensitive deposits, and (v) offering competitively priced money market accounts and CDs with maturities of up to five years. The degree to which each segment of the strategy is achieved will affect profitability and exposure to interest rate risk.

During the first nine months of fiscal year 2007, fixed rate residential loan production totaled $12.2 million, as compared to $17.3 million during the same period of the prior year. At March 31, 2007, the fixed rate residential loan portfolio was $89.2 million, as compared to $89.0 million at March 31, 2006, with both having a weighted average maturity of 196 months. The Company originated $5.0 million in adjustable-rate residential loans during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $7.5 million during the same period of the prior year. At March 31, 2007, fixed rate loans with remaining maturities in excess of 10 years totaled $73.0 million, or 24.2% of net loans receivable, as compared to $77.2 million, or 27.8% of net loans receivable at March 31, 2006. The Company originated $29.4 million of fixed rate commercial loans during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $15.2 million during the same period of the prior year. At March 31, 2007, the fixed rate commercial loan portfolio was $39.4 million, compared to $22.8 million at March 31, 2006, with both having a weighted average maturity of 35 months. The Company originated $42.7 million in adjustable rate commercial loans during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $60.9 million during the same period of the prior year. At March 31, 2007, home equity loans totaled $6.3 million, as compared to $7.0 million at March 31, 2006. Over the last several years, the Company has maintained a weighted average life of its investment portfolio of less than four years. Management continues to focus on customer retention, customer satisfaction, and offering new products to customers in order to increase the Company's amount of less rate-sensitive deposit accounts. Given the decision by the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee to at least temporarily halt interest rate increases, management has limited its willingness to extend maturities of deposits and taken long-term borrowings only when specific opportunities were available. Over the remainder of the fiscal year, this strategy will be continually re-evaluated. In the previous fiscal year, management employed brokered deposits to lock in its cost of funding in an increasing rate environment. In the first nine months of fiscal 2007, the Company has reduced brokered deposits by $13.5 million, and funded asset growth using short- and long-term FHLB borrowings, and retail deposits.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

The following table sets forth as of March 31, 2007, management's estimates of the projected changes in net portfolio value ("NPV") in the event of 100, 200, and 300 basis point ("bp") instantaneous and permanent increases, and 100, 200, and 300 basis point instantaneous and permanent decreases in market interest rates. Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.

Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on an internally generated model using actual maturity and repricing schedules for the Bank's loans and deposits, and are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan repayments and deposit run-offs, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions the Bank may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

Management cannot predict future interest rates or their effect on the Bank's NPV in the future. Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the computation of NPV. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in differing degrees to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have an initial fixed rate period typically from one to five years and over the remaining life of the asset changes in the interest rate are restricted. In addition, the proportion of adjustable-rate loans in the Bank's portfolio could decrease in future periods due to refinancing activity if market interest rates remain steady in the future. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate significantly from those assumed in the table. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their adjustable-rate debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.

The Bank's Board of Directors (the "Board") is responsible for reviewing the Bank's asset and liability policies. The Board's Asset/Liability Committee meets monthly to review interest rate risk and trends, as well as liquidity and capital ratios and requirements. The Bank's management is responsible for administering the policies and determinations of the Board with respect to the Bank's asset and liability goals and strategies.

PART I: Item 4: Controls and Procedures
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.

An evaluation of Southern Missouri Bancorp's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Act")) as of March 31, 2007, was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive and Financial Officer, and several other members of our senior management. The Chief Executive and Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2007, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to management (including the Chief Executive and Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company does not expect that its disclosures and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that companies evaluate and annually report on their systems of internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent accountants must report on management's evaluation of its internal control over financial reporting. We are in the process of reviewing our options regarding documentation and testing of internal control over financial reporting to provide the basis for our report that will, for the first time, be a required part of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008. Due to the ongoing evaluation and testing of our internal controls, there can be no assurance that, if any control deficiencies are identified, they will be remediated before the end of the 2008 fiscal year, or that there may not be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that would be required to be reported. In addition, we expect the evaluation process and any required remediation, if applicable, to increase our accounting, legal and other costs and divert management resources from core business operations.

PART II: Other Information
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth below, in the opinion of management, the Bank is not a party to any pending claims or lawsuits that are expected to have a material effect on the Bank's financial condition or operations. Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving the Bank mainly as a defendant, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which the Bank holds security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to the Bank's business. Aside from such pending claims and lawsuits, which are incident to the conduct of the Bank's ordinary business, the Bank is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings that would have a material effect on the financial condition or operations of the Bank.

In April 2005, the Bank discovered there had been an adverse development with respect to a substandard loan that resulted from allegedly fraudulent activities on the part of a borrower. We have liquidated all assets of the borrower of which we were able to take possession, and, to date, we have incurred charge-offs of $4.7 million. Since June 30, 2006, the Bank has not reported any amount of this loan relationship, or any collateral related thereto, as an asset.

In December 2006, the Bank and two other financial institutions settled their claims against the bonding company which insured the accounting firm that had performed audits on said borrower in exchange for the payment by the bonding company of a total of $850,000. That amount will be distributed among the three financial institutions, including the Bank, according to the terms of an agreement that is yet to be reached among the financial institutions. The Company cannot predict to what extent a recovery will occur.

Item 1a: Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3: Defaults upon Senior Securities

     Not applicable

Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     None

Item 5: Other Information

     None

Item 6: Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.