FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period
Commission File Number: 0-13322
United Bankshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
55-0641179 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
300 United Center
500 Virginia Street, East
Charleston, West Virginia
|
|
25301 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
Zip Code |
Registrants Telephone Number, including Area Code: (304) 424-8800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.) Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class Common Stock, $2.50 Par Value; 43,412,345 shares outstanding as of July 31, 2009.
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, consolidated balance sheets of United Bankshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (United or the Company), consolidated statements of income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the related consolidated statement of changes in shareholders
equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009, the related condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the notes to consolidated financial
statements appear on the following pages.
3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except par value) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
166,911 |
|
|
$ |
190,895 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks |
|
|
14,778 |
|
|
|
14,187 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
20,210 |
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
201,899 |
|
|
|
213,534 |
|
Securities available for sale at estimated fair value
(amortized cost-$1,018,705 at June 30, 2009 and $1,165,116
at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
958,362 |
|
|
|
1,097,043 |
|
Securities held to maturity (estimated fair value-$86,696 at
June 30, 2009 and $103,505 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
102,168 |
|
|
|
116,407 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
77,695 |
|
|
|
78,372 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
12,191 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Loans |
|
|
5,895,222 |
|
|
|
6,020,558 |
|
Less: Unearned income |
|
|
(5,066 |
) |
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans net of unearned income |
|
|
5,890,156 |
|
|
|
6,014,155 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(64,222 |
) |
|
|
(61,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
5,825,934 |
|
|
|
5,952,661 |
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
58,483 |
|
|
|
58,560 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
312,140 |
|
|
|
312,263 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
28,069 |
|
|
|
31,816 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
270,575 |
|
|
|
240,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
7,847,516 |
|
|
$ |
8,102,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
1,066,205 |
|
|
$ |
906,099 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
4,669,705 |
|
|
|
4,741,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
5,735,910 |
|
|
|
5,647,954 |
|
Borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
112,115 |
|
|
|
128,185 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
311,042 |
|
|
|
434,425 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
667,378 |
|
|
|
879,538 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
Other long-term borrowings |
|
|
184,934 |
|
|
|
185,147 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
73,657 |
|
|
|
84,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
7,091,133 |
|
|
|
7,365,379 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; Authorized-50,000,000 shares,
none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value; Authorized-100,000,000
shares; issued-44,319,157 and 44,320,832 at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively, including 906,733 and
916,941 shares in treasury at June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
110,798 |
|
|
|
110,802 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
96,038 |
|
|
|
96,654 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
649,748 |
|
|
|
637,152 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(69,376 |
) |
|
|
(76,151 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(30,825 |
) |
|
|
(31,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
756,383 |
|
|
|
736,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
7,847,516 |
|
|
$ |
8,102,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated unaudited financial statements.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
77,902 |
|
|
$ |
88,405 |
|
|
$ |
156,487 |
|
|
$ |
183,266 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term
investments |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Interest and dividends on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
12,307 |
|
|
|
14,868 |
|
|
|
26,105 |
|
|
|
30,021 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
92,532 |
|
|
|
106,419 |
|
|
|
187,237 |
|
|
|
219,965 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
20,924 |
|
|
|
30,183 |
|
|
|
45,158 |
|
|
|
65,312 |
|
Interest on short-term borrowings |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
10,580 |
|
Interest on long-term borrowings |
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
18,612 |
|
|
|
18,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
30,323 |
|
|
|
43,267 |
|
|
|
64,111 |
|
|
|
94,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
62,209 |
|
|
|
63,152 |
|
|
|
123,126 |
|
|
|
125,430 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
23,251 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
31,279 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
38,958 |
|
|
|
58,801 |
|
|
|
91,847 |
|
|
|
118,979 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from trust and brokerage services |
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
4,553 |
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
|
8,492 |
|
Fees from deposit services |
|
|
10,255 |
|
|
|
10,002 |
|
|
|
19,558 |
|
|
|
19,085 |
|
Bankcard fees and merchant discounts |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
Other service charges, commissions, and fees |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
Income from bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
2,321 |
|
Income from mortgage banking |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
Net (losses) gains on sales/calls of investment securities |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(1,295 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
33,240 |
|
|
|
37,793 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation |
|
|
14,751 |
|
|
|
15,534 |
|
|
|
29,698 |
|
|
|
30,978 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
9,623 |
|
|
|
6,991 |
|
Net occupancy expense |
|
|
4,154 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
8,271 |
|
Equipment expense |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
Data processing expense |
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
Bankcard processing expense |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
FDIC insurance expense |
|
|
4,284 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
12,041 |
|
|
|
12,057 |
|
|
|
22,728 |
|
|
|
23,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
45,698 |
|
|
|
41,477 |
|
|
|
87,512 |
|
|
|
82,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
11,110 |
|
|
|
36,507 |
|
|
|
37,575 |
|
|
|
73,937 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,954 |
|
|
|
11,360 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
23,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
8,156 |
|
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
37,789 |
|
|
$ |
50,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited) continued
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
43,396,901 |
|
|
|
43,264,809 |
|
|
|
43,402,034 |
|
|
|
43,255,830 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
43,463,108 |
|
|
|
43,419,616 |
|
|
|
43,464,674 |
|
|
|
43,419,276 |
|
See notes to consolidated unaudited financial statements.
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
44,320,832 |
|
|
$ |
110,802 |
|
|
$ |
96,654 |
|
|
$ |
637,152 |
|
|
|
($76,151 |
) |
|
|
($31,745 |
) |
|
$ |
736,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,789 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,564 |
|
Stock based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (50,375 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(847 |
) |
Distribution of treasury stock for deferred
compensation plan (20,595 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Cash dividends ($0.58 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,193 |
) |
Common stock options exercised (39,988
shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
Fractional shares adjustment |
|
|
(1,675 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
44,319,157 |
|
|
$ |
110,798 |
|
|
$ |
96,038 |
|
|
$ |
649,748 |
|
|
|
($69,376 |
) |
|
|
($30,825 |
) |
|
$ |
756,383 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated unaudited financial statements
7
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
$ |
23,727 |
|
|
$ |
50,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held to maturity |
|
|
14,030 |
|
|
|
17,533 |
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale |
|
|
179,321 |
|
|
|
336,025 |
|
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(34,091 |
) |
|
|
(376,577 |
) |
Net purchases of bank premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
Net change in other investment securities |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
Net change in loans |
|
|
96,149 |
|
|
|
(51,677 |
) |
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
253,254 |
|
|
|
(75,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(25,184 |
) |
|
|
(25,081 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(60,164 |
) |
Redemption of debt related to trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,310 |
) |
Distribution of treasury stock for deferred compensation plan |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
87,956 |
|
|
|
123,622 |
|
Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements
to repurchase and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(351,378 |
) |
|
|
(207,000 |
) |
|
|
|
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(288,616 |
) |
|
|
21,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(11,635 |
) |
|
|
(3,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
213,534 |
|
|
|
230,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
201,899 |
|
|
$ |
227,250 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated unaudited financial statements.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1. GENERAL
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of United Bankshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (United) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles for interim
financial information generally accepted in the United States and with the instructions for Form
10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not contain all of
the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statements
presented as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the three-month and six-month periods then ended
have not been audited. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 has been extracted
from the audited financial statements included in Uniteds 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders. The
accounting and reporting policies followed in the presentation of these financial statements are
consistent with those applied in the preparation of the 2008 Annual Report of United on Form 10-K.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial
position and results of operations for the interim periods have been made. Such adjustments are of
a normal and recurring nature.
The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of United and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. United considers all of its principal business activities to be bank
related. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements. Dollars are in thousands, except per share and share data or
unless otherwise noted.
New Accounting Standards
On June 29, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 168 (SFAS
168), The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, which replaces FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. SFAS 168 states that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification will
become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized
by the FASB to be applied by all nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also source
of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods after September 15, 2009. On the effective date, the Codification
will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. United does not
believe the adoption of the standard will have a significant impact on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations.
On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 167 (SFAS 167), which amends FASB Interpretation No
46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. SFAS 167 changes how a company determines
when an entity that is not sufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting should be
consolidated. SFAS 167 will require a company to provide additional disclosures about its
involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to
that involvement. SFAS 167 is effective for interim periods ending after November 15, 2009. Early
adoption is prohibited. United plans to adopt SFAS 167 during the fourth quarter of 2009, but does
not believe the guidance will have a significant impact on the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166 (SFAS 166), Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets, which amends FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS 166 will require additional
information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where
companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS 166
also eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the
9
requirements of derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is effective for
interim periods ending after November 15, 2009. Early adoption
is prohibited. United plans to adopt SFAS 166 during the
fourth quarter of 2009, but does not believe the guidance will have a significant impact on the
Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165 (SFAS 165), Subsequent Events which establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 requires
the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis
for that date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. United has
adopted SFAS 165 during the second quarter of 2009 and this adoption did not have an impact on
Uniteds consolidated financial statements.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position SFAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (SFAS 157-4). This final staff position provides
additional guidance in determining whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a
transaction is not distressed for fair value measurement purposes as defined in SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157-4 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but
early adoption was permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. United adopted SFAS
157-4 during the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material
impact on Uniteds consolidated financial statements.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position SFAS 115-2, SFAS 124-2, and EITF 99-20-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This final staff position
provides guidance in determining whether impairments in debt securities are other-than-temporary,
and modifies the presentation and disclosures surrounding such instruments. This final staff
position is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early adoption was
permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. United adopted SFAS 115-2 during the
second quarter of 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Uniteds
consolidated financial statements.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position SFAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS 107-1 and
APB 28-1). This final staff position amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Values
of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in
interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. The final staff position
also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in all
interim financial statements. This final staff position is effective for interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009, but early adoption was permitted for interim periods ending after March 15,
2009. The disclosure provisions of SFAS 107-1 have been adopted by United and the adoption did not
have any impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP 99-20-1, Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue
No. 99-20 (FSP 99-20). This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF 99-20, Recognition of
Interest Income and Impairment of Purchased Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a
Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, by eliminating the requirement that an investment
holders best estimate of cash flows be based upon those that a market participant would use.
Instead, FSP 99-20 requires that an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) be recognized as a
realized loss through earnings when it is probable that there has been an adverse change in the
investment holders estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected. This requirement
and amendment makes the impairment model in EITF 99-20 consistent with the impairment model in SFAS
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. In addition, this FSP
provides additional guidance emphasizing that investment holders should consider all available
information (i.e., past events, current conditions, and expected events) when developing estimates
of future cash flows in their EITF 99-20 OTTI assessments. FSP 99-20 was effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008. Retroactive application to
10
prior interim or annual reporting periods is not permitted. The adoption of this FSP did not have any impact on
the level or amount of OTTI impairments because United does not have any transferred securitized
financial assets.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132R-1 (FSP 132R-1), Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This FSP amends FASB Statement 132R, Employers Disclosures
about Pensions and other Postretirement Benefits, to require additional disclosures about assets
held in an employers defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The objectives of the
enhanced disclosures are to provide users of financial statements with an understanding of: how
investment allocation decisions are made; the major categories of an employers plan assets; the
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of a plans assets; the effect of
fair value measurements on plan assets using significant unobservable inputs, and significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. Additionally, FSP 132R requires employers to reconcile
the beginning and ending balances of plan assets with fair values measured using significant Level
3 unobservable inputs. This reconciliation will require entities to separately present changes
during the period that are attributable to actual return on plan assets, purchases, sales and
settlements, and transfers in and out of Level 3. The disclosure provisions of FSP 132R-1 are
required for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2009. Comparative disclosures are not
required upon adoption and earlier application of this FSP is permitted. The adoption of FSP 132R-1
is not expected to have an impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or
liquidity.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46R-8 (FSP 140/FIN 46R). FSP 140/FIN 46R
requires public entities to provide additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and
their involvement with VIEs. The FASB issued this FSP with the intent to immediately improve the
level of transparency about these transactions and involvements, in advance of the effective date
of the proposed amendments to SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishment of Liabilities, and FIN 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The
enhanced disclosures of FSP 140/FIN 46R were required for the first reporting period, interim or
annual, ending after December 15, 2008. The disclosure provisions of this FSP have been adopted by
United and the adoption did not have any impact on the Companys financial condition, results of
operations, or liquidity.
In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161 (SFAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities which amends FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS 161 is intended to
improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring
enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years
and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged. The
disclosure provisions of SFAS 161 have been adopted by United and the adoption did not have any
impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141-revised 2007 (SFAS 141R),Business
Combinations which amends FASB Statement 141 (SFAS 141). SFAS 141R aims to improve the relevance,
representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity
provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS 141R is
effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Thus, SFAS 141R had no effect on Uniteds consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. SFAS 160 will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. United adopted SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on Uniteds consolidated financial
statements.
11
2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available for sale are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
12,035 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
12,106 |
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
|
101,720 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
102,511 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
576,667 |
|
|
|
19,157 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
595,807 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
170,161 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
16,616 |
|
|
|
153,574 |
|
Trust preferred collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
137,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,208 |
|
|
|
82,335 |
|
Single issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
15,535 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,230 |
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,018,705 |
|
|
$ |
21,124 |
|
|
$ |
81,467 |
|
|
$ |
958,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
10,704 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,817 |
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
|
112,720 |
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
112,732 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
681,147 |
|
|
|
13,525 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
694,597 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
202,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,492 |
|
|
|
180,722 |
|
Trust preferred collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
137,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,608 |
|
|
|
84,132 |
|
Single issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
15,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
9,269 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,165,116 |
|
|
$ |
14,995 |
|
|
$ |
83,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,097,043 |
|
|
|
|
Provided on the following page is a summary of securities available for sale which were in an
unrealized loss position at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
7,512 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
|
25,368 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
$ |
5,053 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency |
|
|
3,829 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
133,114 |
|
|
|
16,523 |
|
Trust preferred collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
71,825 |
|
|
|
50,464 |
|
Single issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
4,650 |
|
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,079 |
|
|
$ |
10,263 |
|
|
$ |
216,028 |
|
|
$ |
71,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
38,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
Agency |
|
|
13,718 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
5,491 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
159,590 |
|
|
|
18,008 |
|
|
|
21,133 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
Trust preferred collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
19,562 |
|
|
|
10,211 |
|
|
|
64,571 |
|
|
|
43,396 |
|
Single issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
5,537 |
|
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
237,594 |
|
|
$ |
34,902 |
|
|
$ |
95,283 |
|
|
$ |
48,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities consist mainly of equity securities of financial institutions. The
following table shows the proceeds from sales and calls of available for sale securities and the
gross realized gains and losses on sales and calls of those securities that have been included in
earnings as a result of those sales and calls. Gains or losses on sales and calls of available for
sale securities were recognized by the specific identification method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Proceeds from sales and calls |
|
$ |
94,365 |
|
|
$ |
212,683 |
|
|
$ |
180,116 |
|
|
$ |
336,561 |
|
Gross realized gains |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Gross realized losses |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
The realized losses relate to sales of securities within a rabbi trust for the payment of benefits
under a deferred compensation plan for certain key officers of United and its subsidiaries.
Gross unrealized losses on available for sale securities were $81,467 on 142 securities at June 30,
2009. Securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of trust
preferred collateralized debt obligations, single
13
issue trust preferred securities and non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities. The trust preferred collateralized debt
obligations and the single issue trust preferred securities relate mainly to securities of
financial institutions. The unrealized loss on the non-agency residential mortgage-backed
securities portfolio relates primarily to AAA securities of various private label issuers. The
Company has no exposure to real estate investment trusts (REITS) in its investment portfolio.
In determining whether or not the available for sale trust preferred collateralized debt
obligations, in particular those in an unrealized loss position for twelve months or more, were
other than temporarily impaired, management considered the severity and the duration of the loss in
conjunction with Uniteds positive intent and the more likely than not ability to hold these
securities to recovery of their cost basis or maturity.
In analyzing the duration and severity of the losses, management considered the following: (1) the
market for these securities was not active as evidenced by the lack of trades and the severe
widening of the bid/ask spread; (2) the markets for pooled trust preferred securities (TRUP CDOs)
ultimately became dysfunctional with no significant transactions to report; (3) low market prices
for certain bonds, in the overall debt markets, were evidence of credit stress in the general
markets and not necessarily an indication of credit problems with a particular issuer; and (4) the
general widening in overall risk premiums in the broader markets was responsible for a significant
amount of the price decline in the TRUP CDO portfolio.
The amortized cost of available for sale TRUP CDOs in an unrealized loss position for twelve months
or longer as of June 30, 2009 consisted of $18.36 million in investment grade bonds, $12.91 million
in split-rated bonds and $99.83 million in below investment grade bonds. In the single issue trust
preferred securities portfolio, there were no securities greater than $5 million in an unrealized
loss position for twelve months or longer.
The following is a summary of the available for sale TRUP CDOs and single issue trust preferred
securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or greater as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
Class |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Grade |
|
|
Split Rated |
|
|
Grade |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Senior |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,799 |
|
|
$ |
5,201 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine (now in
Senior position) |
|
|
22,284 |
|
|
|
11,549 |
|
|
|
10,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,459 |
|
|
$ |
14,825 |
|
Mezzanine |
|
|
85,005 |
|
|
|
50,477 |
|
|
|
34,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,005 |
|
Single Issue Trust
Preferred |
|
|
8,809 |
|
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
131,098 |
|
|
$ |
77,054 |
|
|
$ |
54,044 |
|
|
$ |
18,355 |
|
|
$ |
12,913 |
|
|
$ |
99,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To determine a net realizable value and assess whether other-than-temporary impairment existed,
management performed detailed cash flow analysis to determine whether, in managements judgment, it
was more likely than not that United would not recover the entire amortized cost basis of the
security. Managements cash flow analysis was performed for each issuer and considered the current
deferrals and defaults, the likelihood that current deferrals would cure or ultimately default,
potential future deferrals and defaults, subordination, cash reserves, excess interest spread,
credit analysis of the underlying collateral and the priority of payments in the cash flow
structure. Management also spoke with analysts who covered specific companies, particularly when
those companies were deferring or experiencing financial difficulties. The underlying collateral
analysis for each issuer took into consideration several factors including TARP participation,
capital adequacy, earnings trends and asset quality. Management also performed a stress test
analysis to determine what level of defaults would have to occur before United would experience a
break in yield or principal.
14
Management also considered the ratings of the Companys bonds in its portfolio and the extent of
downgrades in Uniteds impairment analysis. However, due to historical discrepancies in ratings
from the various rating agencies, management considered it imperative to independently perform its
own credit analysis based on cash flows as described above and exercise managements professional
judgment in evaluating whether it was probable that United would be unable to realize
all principal and interest expected at purchase.
Management does not believe any individual security with an unrealized loss as of June 30, 2009 is
other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, United believes the decline in value resulted
from changes in market interest rates, credit spreads and liquidity, not a change in the expected
contractual cash flows. Based on a review of each of the securities in the investment portfolio,
management concluded that it expected to recover the amortized cost basis of the investment in such
securities. As of June 30, 2009, United does not intend to sell any impaired debt security nor is
it anticipated that it would be required to sell any impaired debt security before the recovery of
its amortized cost basis. For equity securities, United has evaluated the near-term prospects of
the investment in relation to the severity and duration of any impairment and based on that
evaluation, management does not believe any individual equity security is other-than-temporarily
impaired. As of June 30, 2009, United has the ability and intent to hold these equity securities
until a recovery of their fair value to at least the cost basis of the investment.
During the second quarter of 2009, United recorded losses of $132 thousand on certain investment
tax credit securities within its held to maturity investment portfolio and $211 thousand on certain
marketable equity securities within its available for sale investment portfolio that were
considered other-than-temporarily impaired. United also evaluated all of its cost method
investments and identified certain events or changes in circumstances during the second quarter of
2009 which had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of certain cost method securities.
Therefore, United recorded an impairment loss of $794 thousand in the second quarter of 2009 on
these certain cost method securities.
Below is a progression of the anticipated credit losses on securities which United has recorded
other-than-temporary charges on through earnings and other comprehensive income.
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of cumulative credit losses at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
10,489 |
|
Additions for credit losses on securities for which OTTI was not previously recognized |
|
|
1,081 |
|
Additions for additional credit losses on securities for which OTTI was previously
recognized |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of cumulative credit losses at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
11,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
No previous other-than-temporary loss recognized was non-credit related, thus no cumulative effect
adjustment was required as a result of adopting SFAS 115-2.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because the issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without
penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
19,806 |
|
|
$ |
19,914 |
|
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
|
$ |
10,115 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
56,629 |
|
|
|
58,158 |
|
|
|
72,091 |
|
|
|
73,048 |
|
Due after five years through ten
years |
|
|
185,468 |
|
|
|
189,077 |
|
|
|
226,455 |
|
|
|
226,647 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
751,758 |
|
|
|
686,491 |
|
|
|
851,397 |
|
|
|
782,459 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,018,705 |
|
|
$ |
958,362 |
|
|
$ |
1,165,116 |
|
|
$ |
1,097,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities held to maturity are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
11,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,728 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,122 |
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
|
29,519 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
29,817 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Single issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
54,176 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
18,004 |
|
|
|
36,192 |
|
Other corporate securities |
|
|
6,956 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,431 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
102,168 |
|
|
$ |
2,800 |
|
|
$ |
18,272 |
|
|
$ |
86,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
11,455 |
|
|
$ |
2,630 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,085 |
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
|
34,495 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
34,798 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
Non-agency |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Single issue trust preferred securities |
|
|
59,069 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
15,324 |
|
|
|
44,149 |
|
Other corporate securities |
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
10,330 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
116,407 |
|
|
$ |
3,636 |
|
|
$ |
16,538 |
|
|
$ |
103,505 |
|
|
|
|
Other corporate securities consist mainly of bonds of corporations. Gross realized gains from
calls of securities held to maturity were $13 for the second quarter and first half of 2009. Gross
realized gains from calls of securities held to maturity were $14 and $38 for the second quarter
and first half of 2008, respectively. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt
securities held to maturity at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 by contractual maturity are
shown on the following page. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
the issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
5,223 |
|
|
$ |
12,084 |
|
|
$ |
11,203 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
8,128 |
|
|
|
8,347 |
|
|
|
10,085 |
|
|
|
10,267 |
|
Due after five years through ten
years |
|
|
14,161 |
|
|
|
15,082 |
|
|
|
16,206 |
|
|
|
17,549 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
75,168 |
|
|
|
58,044 |
|
|
|
78,032 |
|
|
|
64,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
102,168 |
|
|
$ |
86,696 |
|
|
$ |
116,407 |
|
|
$ |
103,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying value of securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and for other purposes as required or permitted by law, approximated
$893,151 and $1,101,632 at June 30, 2009 and
16
December 31, 2008, respectively.
3. LOANS
Major classifications of loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
$ |
1,119,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,274,937 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family residential |
|
|
1,911,673 |
|
|
|
1,915,355 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,651,022 |
|
|
|
1,647,307 |
|
Construction |
|
|
621,668 |
|
|
|
601,995 |
|
Other |
|
|
253,563 |
|
|
|
245,214 |
|
Installment |
|
|
337,456 |
|
|
|
335,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans |
|
$ |
5,895,222 |
|
|
$ |
6,020,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include loans held for sale of $12,191 and $868 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Loans held for sale consist of single-family residential real
estate loans originated for sale in the secondary market.
Uniteds subsidiary banks have made loans, in the normal course of business, to the directors and
officers of United and its subsidiaries, and to their affiliates. Such related party loans were
made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing
at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons and did not involve more than normal
risk of collectibility. The aggregate dollar amount of these loans was $110,494 and $123,536 at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
4. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
United maintains an allowance for loan losses and an allowance for lending-related commitments such
as unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. The allowance for lending-related commitments
of $2,312 and $2,109 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, is separately classified
as a liability on the balance sheet. The combined allowances for loan losses and lending-related
commitments are referred to as the allowance for credit losses.
The allowance for credit losses is managements estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in
the lending portfolio. Managements evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
and the appropriate provision for credit losses is based upon a quarterly evaluation of the loan
portfolio and lending-related commitments. This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires
significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows, value of collateral,
losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of
current economic trends, all of which are susceptible to constant and significant change. The
allowance allocated to specific credits and loan pools grouped by similar risk characteristics is
reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted as necessary based upon subsequent changes in
circumstances. In determining the components of the allowance for credit losses, management
considers the risk arising in part from, but not limited to, charge-off and delinquency trends,
current economic and business conditions, lending policies and procedures, the size and risk
characteristics of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit, and other various factors. Loans
deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for credit losses, while recoveries of
previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for credit losses. Credit expenses
related to the allowance for credit losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments are
reported in the provision for credit losses in the income statement.
17
A progression of the allowance for credit losses, which includes the allowance for credit losses
and the allowance for lending-related commitments, for the periods presented is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
64,682 |
|
|
$ |
59,050 |
|
|
$ |
63,603 |
|
|
$ |
58,744 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
23,251 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
31,279 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,933 |
|
|
|
63,401 |
|
|
|
94,882 |
|
|
|
65,195 |
|
Loans charged-off |
|
|
(21,702 |
) |
|
|
(4,484 |
) |
|
|
(29,053 |
) |
|
|
(6,517 |
) |
Less: Recoveries |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
(21,399 |
) |
|
|
(4,240 |
) |
|
|
(28,348 |
) |
|
|
(6,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
66,534 |
|
|
$ |
59,161 |
|
|
$ |
66,534 |
|
|
$ |
59,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. RISK ELEMENTS
Nonperforming assets include loans on which no interest is currently being accrued, principal or
interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more and for which the terms have been
modified due to deterioration in the financial position of the borrower. Loans are designated as
nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal or interest is doubtful.
This generally occurs when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest unless the
loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. When interest accruals are
discontinued, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed, and unpaid
interest accrued in prior years is charged to the allowance for credit losses. Nonperforming assets
also includes other real estate owned which consists of property acquired through foreclosure and
is stated at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs.
Nonperforming assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
42,825 |
|
|
$ |
42,317 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest |
|
|
16,532 |
|
|
|
11,881 |
|
Restructured loans |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
60,452 |
|
|
|
54,198 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
42,223 |
|
|
|
19,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
102,675 |
|
|
$ |
74,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans are designated as impaired when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal
and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement is doubtful. At June
30, 2009, the recorded investment in loans that were considered to be impaired was $52,378 (of
which $42,825 were on a nonaccrual basis). Included in this amount is $20,477 of impaired loans
for which the related allowance for credit losses is $4,235 and $31,901 of impaired loans that do
not have an allowance for credit losses due to managements estimate that the fair value of the
underlying collateral of these loans is sufficient for full repayment of the loan and interest. At
December 31, 2008, the recorded investment in loans that were considered to be impaired was $59,742
(of which $42,317 were on a nonaccrual basis). Included in this amount were $30,253 of impaired
loans for which the related allowance for credit losses was $5,434 and $29,489 of impaired loans
that did not have an allowance for credit losses. The average recorded investment in impaired loans
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
approximately $55,005 and $50,281, respectively.
United recognized interest income on impaired loans of approximately $135 and $329 for the quarter
and six months
18
ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $341 and $678 for the quarter and six months
ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Substantially all of the interest income was recognized using the accrual method of income
recognition. The amount of interest income that would have been recorded under the original terms
for the above loans was $1,012 and $1,929 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, and $850 and $1,632 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following is a summary of intangible assets subject to amortization and those not subject to
amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible assets |
|
$ |
30,995 |
|
|
|
($24,976 |
) |
|
$ |
6,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill not subject to
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
312,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible assets |
|
$ |
30,995 |
|
|
|
($23,611 |
) |
|
$ |
7,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill not subject to
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
312,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United incurred amortization expense of $662 and $1,366 for the quarter and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively, and $940 and $1,958 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, related to intangible assets. The table presented below sets forth the anticipated
amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the next five years:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
2009 |
|
$ |
2,561 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,884 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,362 |
|
2012 |
|
|
915 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
662 |
|
7. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are a significant source
of funds for the Company. United has various unused lines of credit available from certain of its
correspondent banks in the aggregate amount of $300,000. These lines of credit, which bear interest
at prevailing market rates, permit United to borrow funds in the overnight market, and are
renewable annually subject to certain conditions. At June 30, 2009, federal funds purchased were
$112,115 while securities sold under agreements to repurchase were $311,042.
United has available funds of $60,000 with two unrelated financial institutions to provide for
general liquidity needs. Both are unsecured revolving lines of credit. One has a one-year renewable
term while the other line of credit has a two-year renewable term. Each line of credit carries an
indexed floating rate of interest. At June 30, 2009, United had no outstanding balance under these
lines of credit. Both lines require compliance with various financial and nonfinancial covenants.
As of June 30, 2009, United was not in compliance with two of the financial covenants on one of
those
19
lines (ratios of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets and nonperforming assets
to net loans plus OREO). The Company has had discussions with the lender and expects to have the
issue resolved prior to the end of the third quarter of 2009.
United Bank (VA) participates in the Treasury Investment Program, which is essentially the U.S.
Treasurys savings account for companies depositing employment and other tax payments. The bank
retains the funds in an open-ended interest-bearing note until the Treasury withdraws or calls
the funds. A maximum note balance is established and that amount must be collateralized at all
times. All tax deposits or a portion of the tax deposits up to the maximum balance are generally
available as a source of short-term investment funding. As of June 30, 2009, United Bank (VA) had
an outstanding balance of $3,785 and had additional funding available of $1,215.
8. LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
Uniteds subsidiary banks are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). Membership in the FHLB
makes available short-term and long-term borrowings from collateralized advances. All FHLB
borrowings are collateralized by a mix of single-family residential mortgage loans, commercial
loans and investment securities. At June 30, 2009, United had an unused borrowing amount of
$1,487,126 available subject to delivery of collateral after certain trigger points.
Advances may be called by the FHLB or redeemed by United based on predefined factors and penalties.
At June 30, 2009, $667,378 of FHLB advances with a weighted-average interest rate of 2.87% is
scheduled to mature within the next ten years.
The scheduled maturities of borrowings are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
384,685 |
|
2011 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
87,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
667,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
United has a total of ten statutory business trusts that were formed for the purpose of issuing or
participating in pools of trust preferred capital securities (Capital Securities) with the proceeds
invested in junior subordinated debt securities (Debentures) of United. The Debentures, which are
subordinate and junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness and
certain other financial obligations of United, are the sole assets of the trusts and Uniteds
payment under the Debentures is the sole source of revenue for the trusts. At June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the outstanding balances of the Debentures were $184,934 and $185,147
respectively, and were included in the category of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets entitled Other long-term borrowings. The Capital Securities are not included as a
component of shareholders equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. United fully and
unconditionally guarantees each individual trusts obligations under the Capital Securities.
Under the provisions of the subordinated debt, United has the right to defer payment of interest on
the subordinated debt at any time, or from time to time, for periods not exceeding five years. If
interest payments on the subordinated debt are deferred, the dividends on the Capital Securities
are also deferred. Interest on the subordinated debt is cumulative.
The Trust Preferred Securities currently qualify at Tier I capital of United for regulatory
purposes.
20
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
United is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to alter its own exposure to fluctuations
in interest rates. These financial instruments include loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit. The instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount
recognized in the financial statements.
Uniteds maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the
financial instrument for the loan commitments and standby letters of credit is the contractual or
notional amount of those instruments. United uses the same policies in making commitments and
conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Collateral may be obtained, if
deemed necessary, based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the commitment contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Since many of
the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily, and historically do not, represent future cash requirements. The amount of
collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon the extension of credit, is based on managements
credit evaluation of the counterparty. United had approximately $1,830,066 and $1,874,051 of loan
commitments outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, the majority of
which expire within one year.
Commercial and standby letters of credit are agreements used by Uniteds customers as a means of
improving their credit standing in their dealings with others. Under these agreements, United
guarantees certain financial commitments of its customers. A commercial letter of credit is issued
specifically to facilitate trade or commerce. Typically, under the terms of a commercial letter of
credit, a commitment is drawn upon when the underlying transaction is consummated as intended
between the customer and a third party. United has issued commercial letters of credit of $2,578
and $3,035 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. A standby letter of credit is
generally contingent upon the failure of a customer to perform according to the terms of an
underlying contract with a third party. United has issued standby letters of credit of $125,988 and
$129,023 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. In accordance with FIN 45, United
has determined that substantially all of its letters of credit are renewed on an annual basis and
the fees associated with these letters of credit are immaterial.
10. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
United uses derivative instruments to aid against adverse prices or interest rate movements on the
value of certain assets or liabilities and on future cash flows. These derivatives may consist of
interest rate swaps, caps, floors, collars, futures, forward contracts, written and purchased
options. United also executes derivative instruments with its commercial banking customers to
facilitate its risk management strategies.
United accounts for its derivative financial instruments in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133
(SFAS No. 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. SFAS
No. 133 requires all derivative instruments to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet.
United has designated certain derivative instruments used to manage interest rate risk as hedge
relationships with certain assets, liabilities or cash flows being hedged. Certain derivatives
used for interest rate risk management are not designated in a SFAS No. 133 relationship.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, derivative instruments designated in a hedge relationship to
mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment
attributable to a particular risk, such as interest
21
rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivative instruments designated in hedge relationship to mitigate exposure to variability in
expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow
hedges. As of June 30, 2009, United has fair value hedges and a cash flow hedge.
For a fair value hedge, the fair value of the interest rate swap is recognized on the balance sheet
as either a freestanding asset or liability with a corresponding adjustment to the hedged financial
instrument. Subsequent adjustments due to changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies
as a fair value hedge are offset in current period earnings. For a cash flow hedge, the fair value
of the interest rate swap is recognized on the balance sheet as either a freestanding asset or
liability with a corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income within shareholders
equity, net of tax. Subsequent adjustments due to changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a cash
flow hedge are offset to other comprehensive income, net of tax. The portion of a hedge that is
ineffective is recognized immediately in earnings. No hedge ineffectiveness existed on cash flow
hedges for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
At inception of a hedge relationship, United formally documents the hedged item, the particular
risk management objective, the nature of the risk being hedged, the derivative being used, how
effectiveness of the hedge will be assessed and how the ineffectiveness of the hedge will be
measured. United also assesses hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis using
regression analysis. Hedge ineffectiveness is measured by using the change in fair value method.
The change in fair value method compares the change in the fair value of the hedging derivative to
the change in the fair value of the hedged exposure, attributable to changes in the benchmark rate.
The portion of a hedge that is ineffective is recognized immediately in earnings. Prior to
January 1, 2006, United used the shortcut method for interest rate swaps that met the criteria as
defined under SFAS No. 133. Effective January 1, 2006, United adopted an internal policy of
accounting for all new derivative instruments entered thereafter whereby the shortcut method would
no longer be used.
The derivative portfolio also includes derivative financial instruments not included in hedge
relationships. These derivatives consist of interest rate swaps used for interest rate management
purposes and derivatives executed with commercial banking customers to facilitate their interest
rate management strategies. For derivatives that are not designated in a hedge relationship,
changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recognized in earnings in the same period as the
change in fair value. Gains and losses on other derivative financial instruments are included in
noninterest income and noninterest expense, respectively.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the interest rate derivatives
portfolio used for interest-rate risk management purposes and designated as accounting hedges under
SFAS 133 at June 30, 2009:
Derivative Classifications and Hedging Relationships
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Receive Rate |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Fixed Swap (Hedging Commercial Loans) |
|
$ |
13,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivatives Used in Fair Value Hedges |
|
$ |
13,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Fixed Swap (Hedging FHLB Borrowing) |
|
$ |
234,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Used in Cash Flow Hedge |
|
$ |
234,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivatives Used for Interest Rate
Risk Management and Designated in
SFAS 133 Relationships |
|
$ |
248,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The following tables summarize the fair value of Uniteds derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments under
SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
12,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contracts involve the risk of dealing with both bank customers and institutional
derivative counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. Credit risk arises from the
possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Uniteds exposure is
limited to the replacement value of the contracts rather than the notional amount of the contract.
The Companys agreements generally contain provisions that limit the unsecured exposure up to an
agreed upon threshold. Additionally, the Company attempts to minimize credit risk through certain
approval processes established by management.
23
The effect of Uniteds derivative financial instruments on its unaudited Consolidated Statements of
Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Derivatives in SFAS 133 fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Interest income/ (expense) |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives in SFAS 133 fair
value hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (1) |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
1,972 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
Interest rate contracts (2) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
(1,972 |
) |
|
$ |
(755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Derivatives in SFAS 133 fair value
hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Interest income/ (expense) |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives in SFAS 133 fair
value hedging relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts (1) |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
2,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
Interest rate contracts (2) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
(2,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents net gains from derivative assets not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS
133. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents net losses from derivative liabilities not designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS 133. |
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
United adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), on January 1, 2008 to determine
the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established by SFAS
157, which also clarifies that fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price,
representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants.
In February of 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-2 (FSP 157-2)
which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for
those items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. FSP 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 for such
24
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Thus, United only partially applied SFAS 157 in 2008. Those items
affected by FSP 157-2 include other real estate owned (OREO), goodwill and core deposit
intangibles. United fully adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2009 and its implementation did not have
a material impact on Uniteds consolidated financial statements.
In October of 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-3 (FSP 157-3) to clarify the application
of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and to provide key considerations in determining the
fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP 157-3
was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements were not
issued.
SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those
valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained
from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect Uniteds market assumptions. The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 based on these two types of inputs are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets and liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Valuation is based on observable inputs including quoted
prices in active markets for similar assets and
liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets and liabilities in less active markets, and
model-based valuation techniques for which significant
assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated
by observable data in the market. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one
or more significant inputs or assumptions that are
unobservable in the market. |
When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, United looks to active and
observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities whenever possible and classifies such
items in Level 1. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, United
looks to market observable data for similar assets and liabilities and classifies such items as
Level 2. Nevertheless, certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable
markets and United must use alternative valuation techniques using unobservable inputs to determine
a fair value and classifies such items as Level 3. The level within the fair value hierarchy is
based on the lowest level of input that is significant in the fair value measurement.
The following describes the valuation techniques used by United to measure certain financial assets
and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:
Securities available for sale: Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on
a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level
1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent
valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are
derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile
prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by
using pricing models that considers observable market data (Level 2). Management internally reviews
the fair values provided by third party vendors on a monthly basis. Managements review consists
of comparing fair values assigned by third party vendors to trades and offerings observed by
management. The review requires some degree of judgment as to the number or percentage of
securities to review on the part of management which could fluctuate based on results of past
reviews and in comparison to current expectations. Exceptions that are deemed to be material are
reviewed by management. Prices obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced
liquidation or distressed sales are not adjusted by management. Management utilizes a number of
factors to determine if a market is inactive, all of which may require a significant level of
judgment. Factors that management considers include: a significant widening of the
25
bid-ask spread, a considerable decline in the volume and level of trading activity in the instrument, a significant
variance in prices among market participants, and a significant reduction in the level of
observable inputs. Any securities available for sale not valued based upon quoted market prices or third party pricing models that consider observable market data are considered
Level 3.
Derivatives: United utilizes interest rate swaps in order to hedge exposure to interest
rate risk and variability of cash flows associated to changes in the underlying interest rate of
the hedged item. United utilizes third-party vendors for derivative valuation purposes. These
vendors determine the appropriate fair value based on a net present value calculation of the cash
flows related to the interest rate swaps using primarily observable market inputs such as interest
rate yield curves (Level 2). Valuation adjustments to derivative fair values for liquidity and
credit risk are also taken into consideration, as well as the likelihood of default by United and
derivative counterparties, the net counterparty exposure and the remaining maturities of the
positions. Values obtained from third party vendors are typically not adjusted by management.
Management internally reviews the derivative values provided by third party vendors on a quarterly
basis. All derivative values are tested for reasonableness by management utilizing a net present
value calculation.
The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
Description |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
12,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
State and political subdivisions |
|
|
102,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
|
595,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency |
|
|
153,574 |
|
|
$ |
695 |
|
|
|
152,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred collateralized
debt obligations |
|
|
82,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,335 |
|
Single issue trust preferred
securities |
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
7,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial assets |
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities |
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
26
The following table presents additional information about financial assets and liabilities measured
at fair value at June 30, 2009 on a recurring basis and for which United has utilized Level 3
inputs to determine fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
Trust preferred |
|
|
|
collateralized |
|
|
|
debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
84,132 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
82,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains or losses for the period
included in earnings (or changes in net assets)
attributable to the change in unrealized gains or
losses relating to assets still held at reporting date |
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008, United changed its valuation technique for pooled trust preferred securities
available for sale. Previously, United relied on prices compiled by third party vendors using
observable market data (Level 2) to determine the values of these securities. However, SFAS 157
assumes that fair values of financial assets are determined in an orderly transaction and not a
forced liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date. Based on financial market
conditions, United felt that the fair values obtained from third party vendors reflected forced
liquidation or distressed sales for these trust preferred securities. Management first noted a
significant widening of the bid-ask spread during the first half of 2008. Management reviewed the
trading patterns recorded by certain institutional trading desks and determined that the volume and
trading activity in the pooled trust preferred sector had significantly decreased. Additionally,
management held discussions with institutional traders to identify trends in the number and type of
transactions related to the pooled trust preferred sector. Based upon managements review of the
market conditions for pooled trust preferred securities, it was determined that an income approach
valuation technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs
and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs would be more representative of fair value (Level 3)
than the market approach valuation technique used at measurement dates prior to September 30, 2008.
Management considered the following items when calculating the appropriate discount rate: the
implied rate of return when the market was last active, changes in the implied rate of return as
markets moved from very active to inactive, recent changes in credit ratings, and recent activity
showing that the market has built in increased liquidity and credit premiums. Managements
internal credit review of each security was also factored in to determine the appropriate discount
rate. The credit review considered each securitys collateral, subordination, excess spread,
priority of claims, and principal and interest cushion.
Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with
GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
The following describes the valuation techniques used by United to measure certain financial assets
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements.
Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market
value. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale
in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently
offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially
27
different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, United records
any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. No nonrecurring fair value adjustments were
recorded on loans held for sale during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded
within income from mortgage banking on the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income.
Impaired Loans: Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based
on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual
terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired
loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the
collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans.
Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and
accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate
collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal
conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data
(Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if
an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered
Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant,
or the net book value on the applicable business financial statements if not considered
significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables
collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans
allocated to the Allowance for Loan Losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any
fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for credit losses expense
on the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income.
OREO: OREO consists of real estate acquired in foreclosure or other settlement of loans.
Such assets are carried on the balance sheet at the lower of the investment in the assets or the
fair value of the assets less estimated selling costs. Fair value is determined by one of two
methods depending on whether the property has been vacated and an appraisal can be conducted. If
the property has yet to be vacated and thus an appraisal cannot be performed, a Brokers Price
Opinion (i.e. BPO), is obtained. A BPO represents a best estimate valuation performed by a realtor
based on knowledge of current property values and a visual examination of the exterior condition of
the property. Once the property is subsequently vacated, a formal appraisal is obtained and the
recorded asset value appropriately adjusted. On the other hand, if the OREO property has been
vacated and an appraisal can be conducted, the fair value of the property is determined based upon
the appraisal. An authorized independent appraiser based on consideration of comparable property
values conducts appraisals for United (Level 2). Appraisals for property other than ongoing
construction are straightforward. In contrast, valuation of ongoing construction assets requires
some degree of professional judgment. In conducting an appraisal for ongoing construction property,
the appraiser develops two appraised amounts: an as is appraised value and a completed value.
Based on professional judgment and their knowledge of the particular situation, management
determines the appropriate fair value to be utilized for such property (Level 3). As a matter of
policy, appraisals are updated once a year as long as management feels that a significant decrease
in appraised value has not occurred. If a significant decrease in appraised value is deemed to have
taken place, a new appraisal is obtained prior to the one-year scheduled update.
Intangible Assets: For United, intangible assets consist of goodwill and core deposit
intangibles. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or sooner if indicators of
impairment exist. Goodwill impairment would be defined as the difference between the recorded value
of goodwill (i.e. book value) and the implied fair value of goodwill. In determining the implied
fair value of goodwill for purposes of evaluating goodwill impairment, United determines the fair
value of the reporting unit and compares the fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying
value exceeds the fair value, a step two test is performed whereby the implied fair value is
computed by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets from the fair value
of the reporting unit. Core deposit intangibles relate to the estimated value of the deposit base
of acquired institutions. Management reviews core deposit intangible assets on an annual basis, or
sooner if indicators of impairment exist, and evaluates changes in facts and circumstances that may
indicate impairment in the carrying value. No fair value measurement of intangible assets was made
during the six months of 2009.
28
The following table summarizes Uniteds financial assets that were measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis during the period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Identical |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
YTD |
Description |
|
2009 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Losses |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
$ |
20,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,259 |
|
|
$ |
13,218 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
Other Real Estate Owned |
|
|
42,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,521 |
|
|
|
3,702 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by United in estimating its fair value disclosures
for other financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and
cash equivalents approximate those assets fair values.
Securities held to maturity and other securities: The estimated fair values of held to
maturity are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or
similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by
observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine
the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that considers observable
market data. Any securities held to maturity not valued based upon the methods above are valued
based on a discounted cash flow methodology using appropriately adjusted discount rates reflecting
nonperformance and liquidity risks. Other securities consist mainly of shares of Federal Home Loan
Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock that do not have readily determinable fair values and are
carried at cost.
Loans: The fair values of certain mortgage loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential),
credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold
in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics.
The fair values of other loans (e.g., commercial real estate and rental property mortgage loans,
commercial and industrial loans, financial institution loans and agricultural loans) are estimated
using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with
similar terms to borrowers of similar creditworthiness.
Deposits: The fair values of demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking,
regular savings and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount
payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of
variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair
values at the reporting date. Fair values of fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated
using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on
certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Short-term Borrowings: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under
repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.
Long-term Borrowings: The fair values of Uniteds Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and
trust preferred securities are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on Uniteds
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
29
The estimated fair values of Uniteds financial instruments are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
201,899 |
|
|
$ |
201,899 |
|
|
$ |
213,534 |
|
|
$ |
213,534 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
958,362 |
|
|
|
958,362 |
|
|
|
1,097,043 |
|
|
|
1,097,043 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
102,168 |
|
|
|
86,696 |
|
|
|
116,407 |
|
|
|
103,505 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
77,695 |
|
|
|
77,695 |
|
|
|
78,372 |
|
|
|
78,372 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
12,191 |
|
|
|
12,191 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
Loans |
|
|
5,890,156 |
|
|
|
5,823,266 |
|
|
|
6,014,155 |
|
|
|
6,074,264 |
|
Derivative financial assets |
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
6,201 |
|
|
|
6,201 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
5,735,910 |
|
|
|
5,762,822 |
|
|
|
5,647,954 |
|
|
|
5,696,733 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
426,942 |
|
|
|
426,942 |
|
|
|
778,320 |
|
|
|
778,320 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
852,312 |
|
|
|
856,294 |
|
|
|
852,685 |
|
|
|
867,422 |
|
Derivative financial liabilities |
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
19,004 |
|
|
|
19,004 |
|
12. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
On May 15, 2006, Uniteds shareholders approved the 2006 Stock Option Plan. A total of 1,500,000
shares of Uniteds authorized but unissued common stock are allocated for the 2006 Stock Option
Plan. During the first year of the plan, 400,000 options were available for award to eligible
employees; however, not all 400,000 options were awarded in that year. After the first year,
400,000 options plus any unissued options from prior years will be available for award to eligible
employees. All options granted under the 2006 Stock Option Plan will be non-statutory stock options
(NSOs), i.e. options that do not qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code. Subject to certain change in control provisions, recipients of options will
be fully vested in and permitted to exercise options granted under the 2006 Stock Option Plan three
years from the grant date. As of June 30, 2009, 254,550 shares have been granted under the 2006
Stock Option Plan. United recognized compensation expense of $273 thousand and $277 thousand for
the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, which was included in employee compensation
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. A Form S-8 was filed on October 25, 2006 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to register all the shares available for the 2006 Stock Option
Plan.
United currently has options outstanding from various option plans other than the 2006 Stock Option
Plan (the Prior Plans); however, no common shares of United stock are available for grants under
the Prior Plans as these plans have expired. Awards outstanding under the Prior Plans will remain
in effect in accordance with their respective terms. The maximum term for options granted under the
plans is ten (10) years.
30
A summary of option activity under the Plans as of June 30, 2009, and the changes during the first
six months of 2009 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Term (Yrs.) |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
1,724,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27.98 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
39,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.21 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
31,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,653,050 |
|
|
$ |
1,514,801 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
28.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,423,750 |
|
|
$ |
1,514,801 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
28.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the status of Uniteds nonvested awards during the first six months
of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value Per Share |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
237,550 |
|
|
$ |
7.06 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
8,250 |
|
|
|
7.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
229,300 |
|
|
$ |
7.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from options exercised under the Plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 was $449 thousand and $408 thousand, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, 39,988 and 35,959 shares, respectively, were issued in connection with stock option
exercises. All shares issued in connection with stock option exercises were issued from available
treasury stock for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised under the Plans during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $505
thousand and $526 thousand, respectively.
SFAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to
be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under
previous standards. While the company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future
(because they depend on, among other things, the date employees exercise stock options), United
recognized cash flows from financing activities of $168 thousand and $315 thousand from excess tax
benefits related to share-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
United has a defined benefit retirement plan covering a majority of employees. Pension benefits
are based on years of service and the average of the employees highest five consecutive plan years
of basic compensation paid during the ten plan years preceding the date of determination.
Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date, but also
for those expected to be earned in the future.
In September of 2007, after a recommendation by Uniteds Pension Committee and approval by Uniteds
Board of Directors, the United Bankshares, Inc. Pension Plan (the Plan) as it relates to
participation was amended. The decision
31
to change the participation rules for the Plan follows current industry trends, as many large and medium size companies have taken similar steps. The amendment provides that employees hired on or after October 1, 2007, will
not be eligible to participate in the Plan. However, new employees will continue to be eligible to
participate in Uniteds Savings and Stock Investment 401(k) plan. This change has absolutely no
impact on current employees (those hired prior to October 1, 2007). They will continue to
participate in the Plan, with no change in benefit provisions, and will continue to be eligible to
participate in Uniteds Savings and Stock Investment 401(k) Plan.
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 are the following amounts
that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension cost: unrecognized transition asset of
$307 ($184 net of tax), unrecognized prior service costs of $7 ($4 net of tax) and unrecognized
actuarial losses of $41,489 ($24,893 net of tax). The amortization of these items expected to be
recognized in net periodic pension cost during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 is $175
($105 net of tax), $1 ($1 net of tax), and $3,859 ($2,315 net of tax), respectively.
Net periodic pension cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 included the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
(1,913 |
) |
|
|
(2,639 |
) |
|
|
(3,825 |
) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost |
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
|
$ |
(444 |
) |
|
$ |
2,361 |
|
|
$ |
(889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Expected return on assets |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase (prior to age 45) |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
14. INCOME TAXES
In accordance with FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, United records a liability for uncertain income tax positions based on a recognition
threshold of more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken on a tax
return, in order for those tax positions to be recognized in the financial statements.
As of June 30, 2009, United has provided a liability for $1,545 of unrecognized tax benefits
related to various federal and state income tax matters. The entire amount of unrecognized tax
benefits, if recognized, would impact Uniteds effective tax rate. Over the next 12 months, the
statute of limitations will close on certain income tax returns. However, at this time, United
cannot reasonably estimate the amount of tax benefits it may recognize over the next 12 months.
United is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service
and State Taxing authorities for the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2007. Late in the first
quarter of 2009, the State of West Virginia finalized its tax exam for the years ended December 31,
2005 through 2007. In accordance with FIN 48, at the close of the examination, United recognized a
benefit associated with net operating loss carryforwards, coupled with a
32
positive adjustment to income tax expense due to settlement of previously uncertain tax positions. The income tax benefit
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to these two events was $11,507.
As of June 30, 2009, the total amount of accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions was
$595. United accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its
provision for federal and state income taxes.
15. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of total comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
8,156 |
|
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
37,789 |
|
|
$ |
50,843 |
|
Available for sale (AFS) securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS securities with OTTI charges during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less : OTTI charges recognized in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on AFS securities with OTTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS securities all other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities arising
during the period |
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
(23,647 |
) |
|
|
6,505 |
|
|
|
(20,798 |
) |
Related income tax effect |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
7,279 |
|
Net reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net
income |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
Related income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
318 |
|
Less: AFS securities with OTTI charges during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
(15,341 |
) |
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
(14,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of AFS securities on other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
(15,341 |
) |
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
(14,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity (HTM) securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion on the unrealized loss for securities transferred from
AFS to the HTM investment portfolio prior to call or maturity |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Related income tax expense |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of HTM securities on other comprehensive income |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedge derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
6,279 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
(1,638 |
) |
Related income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(2,198 |
) |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of cash flow hedge derivatives on other
comprehensive income |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
4,081 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
FASB 158 pension plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
2,250 |
|
Related income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
Related income tax expense |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Related income tax benefit |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of change in pension plan asset on other
comprehensive income |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
(11,211 |
) |
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
(13,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
11,666 |
|
|
$ |
13,936 |
|
|
$ |
44,564 |
|
|
$ |
37,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic earnings per share with that of
diluted earnings per share is presented as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
8,156 |
|
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
37,789 |
|
|
$ |
50,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
43,396,901 |
|
|
|
43,264,809 |
|
|
|
43,402,034 |
|
|
|
43,255,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic common share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
8,156 |
|
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
37,789 |
|
|
$ |
50,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
43,396,901 |
|
|
|
43,264,809 |
|
|
|
43,402,034 |
|
|
|
43,255,830 |
|
Equivalents from stock options |
|
|
66,207 |
|
|
|
154,807 |
|
|
|
62,640 |
|
|
|
163,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
43,463,108 |
|
|
|
43,419,616 |
|
|
|
43,464,674 |
|
|
|
43,419,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted common share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
17. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Variable interest entities (VIEs) are entities that either have a total equity investment that is
insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial
interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions, through voting rights, right to receive the
expected residual returns of the entity, and obligation to absorb the expected losses of the
entity). VIEs can be structured as corporations, trusts, partnerships, or other legal entities.
Uniteds business practices include relationships with certain VIEs. For United, the business
purpose of these relationships primarily consists of funding activities in the form of issuing
trust preferred securities.
United currently sponsors ten statutory business trusts that were created for the purpose of
raising funds that qualify for
34
Tier I regulatory capital. These trusts, of which several were acquired through bank acquisitions,
issued or participated in pools of trust preferred capital securities to third-party investors with
the proceeds invested in junior subordinated debt securities of United. The Company, through a
small capital contribution owns 100% of the voting equity shares of each trust. The assets,
liabilities, operations, and cash flows of each trust are solely related to the issuance,
administration, and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors.
United fully and unconditionally guarantees the obligations of each trust and is obligated to
redeem the junior subordinated debentures upon maturity.
The trusts utilized in these transactions are VIEs as the third-party equity holders lack a
controlling financial interest in the trusts through their inability to make decisions that have a
significant effect on the operations and success of the entities. United does not consolidate these
trusts as it is not the primary beneficiary of these entities because Uniteds equity interest does
not absorb the majority of the trusts expected losses or receive a majority of their expected
residual returns.
Information related to Uniteds statutory trusts is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Capital |
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Issuance Date |
|
Securities Issued |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Century Trust
|
|
March 23, 2000
|
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
|
10.875% Fixed
|
|
March 8, 2030 |
Sequoia Trust I
|
|
March 28, 2001
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
10.18% Fixed
|
|
June 8, 2031 |
United Statutory Trust III
|
|
December 17, 2003
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
3-month LIBOR + 2.85%
|
|
December 17, 2033 |
United Statutory Trust IV
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
3-month LIBOR + 2.85%
|
|
January 23, 2034 |
United Statutory Trust V
|
|
July 12, 2007
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
6.67% Fixed, until October 2012
|
|
October 1,2037 |
United Statutory Trust VI
|
|
September 20, 2007
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
6.60% Fixed, until October 2012
|
|
December 15, 2037 |
Premier Statutory Trust II
|
|
September 25, 2003
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
3-month LIBOR + 3.10%
|
|
October 8, 2033 |
Premier Statutory Trust III
|
|
May 16, 2005
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
3-month LIBOR + 1.74%
|
|
June 15, 2035 |
Premier Statutory Trust IV
|
|
June 20, 2006
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
3-month LIBOR + 1.55%
|
|
September 23, 2036 |
Premier Statutory Trust V
|
|
December 14, 2006
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
6.62% Fixed, until March 2012
|
|
March 1, 2037 |
United, through its banking subsidiaries, also makes limited partner equity investments in various
low income housing and community development partnerships sponsored by independent third-parties.
United invests in these partnerships to either realize tax credits on its consolidated federal
income tax return or for purposes of earning a return on its investment. These partnerships are
considered VIEs as the limited partners lack a controlling financial interest in the entities
through their inability to make decisions that have a significant effect on the operations and
success of the partnerships. Uniteds limited partner interests in these entities is immaterial,
however; these partnerships are not consolidated as United is not deemed to be the primary
beneficiary.
The following table summarizes quantitative information about Uniteds significant involvement in
unconsolidated VIEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
Risk Of |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
Risk Of |
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Loss(1) |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Loss(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred
securities |
|
$ |
185,833 |
|
|
$ |
179,622 |
|
|
$ |
6,211 |
|
|
$ |
186,809 |
|
|
$ |
180,691 |
|
|
$ |
6,119 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents investment in VIEs. |
35
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 to encourage corporations to provide
investors with information about the companys anticipated future financial performance, goals, and
strategies. The act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure, in other words, protection from
unwarranted litigation if actual results are not the same as management expectations.
United desires to provide its shareholders with sound information about past performance and future
trends. Consequently, any forward-looking statements contained in this report, in a report
incorporated by reference to this report, or made by management of United in this report, in any
other reports and filings, in press releases and in oral statements, involves numerous assumptions,
risks and uncertainties.
Actual results could differ materially from those contained in or implied by Uniteds statements
for a variety of factors including, but not limited to: changes in economic conditions; movements
in interest rates; competitive pressures on product pricing and services; success and timing of
business strategies; the nature and extent of governmental actions and reforms; and rapidly
changing technology and evolving banking industry standards.
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion and analysis presents the significant changes in financial condition and
the results of operations of United and its subsidiaries for the periods indicated below. This
discussion and the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes to consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of United Bankshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. Management has evaluated all significant events and
transactions that occurred after June 30, 2009, but prior to August 7, 2009, the date these
financial statements were issued, for potential recognition or disclosure in these financial
statements.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this document.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of United conform with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is
required to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments, which are
reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, are based on information available as
of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These
policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this
financial review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the
financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used
and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates
underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for credit
losses, the valuation of investment securities and the related other-than-temporary impairment
analysis, the accounting for and the valuation of derivative instruments, and the calculation of
the income tax provision to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex
judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
As explained in Note 4, Allowance for Credit Losses to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements, allowance for credit losses represents managements estimate of the probable credit
losses inherent in the lending portfolio. Determining the allowance for credit losses requires
management to make forecasts of losses that are highly uncertain
36
and require a high degree of judgment. At June 30, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $64.2 million and is subject to
periodic adjustment based on managements assessment of current probable losses in the loan portfolio. Such
adjustment from period to period can have a significant impact on Uniteds consolidated financial
statements. To illustrate the potential effect on the financial statements of our estimates of the
allowance for loan losses, a 10% increase in the allowance for loan losses would have required $6.4
million in additional allowance (funded by additional provision for credit losses), which would
have negatively impacted first six months of 2009 net income by approximately $4.2 million, or
$0.10 per common share. Managements evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses
and the appropriate provision for credit losses is based upon a quarterly evaluation of the loan
portfolio and lending related commitments. This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires
significant estimates, including estimates related to the amounts and timing of future cash flows,
value of collateral, losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and
consideration of current economic trends, all of which are susceptible to constant and significant
change. The allowance allocated to specific credits and loan pools grouped by similar risk
characteristics is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted as necessary based upon subsequent
changes in circumstances. In determining the components of the allowance for credit losses,
management considers the risk arising in part from, but not limited to, charge-off and delinquency
trends, current economic and business conditions, lending policies and procedures, the size and
risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit, and other various factors.
Additional information relating to Uniteds allowance for credit losses, including the methodology
used to determine the allowance for credit losses, is described in Note 4. A discussion of the
factors leading to changes in the amount of the allowance for credit losses is included in the
Provision for Credit Losses section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A). As discussed in the MD&A, the increase in the allowance
for credit losses in the first six months of 2009 as compared to the first six months of 2008 can
be directly attributed to the current economic environment. Additional information relating to
Uniteds loans is included in Note 3, Loans to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Accounting estimates are used in the presentation of the investment portfolio and these estimates
impact the presentation of Uniteds financial condition and results of operations. United
classifies its investments in debt and equity securities as either held to maturity or available
for sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Securities held to maturity are accounted for
using historical costs, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Securities available for sale are accounted for at fair value, with the net unrealized gains and
losses, net of income tax effects, presented as a separate component of stockholders equity. When
available, fair values of securities are based on quoted prices or prices obtained from third party
vendors. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value
of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data.
Prices obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales
are not adjusted by management. Where prices reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales, as is
the case with Uniteds portfolio of pooled trust preferred securities, management estimates fair
value based on a discounted cash flow methodology using appropriately adjusted discount rates
reflecting nonperformance and liquidity risks. Due to the subjective nature of this valuation
process, it is possible that the actual fair values of these securities could differ from the
estimated amounts, thereby affecting Uniteds financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. The potential impact to Uniteds financial position, results of operations or cash flows for
changes in the valuation process cannot be reasonably estimated.
If the estimated value of investments is less than the cost or amortized cost, management evaluates
whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect
on the fair value of the investment. If such an event or change has occurred, management must
exercise judgment to determine the nature of the potential impairment (i.e., temporary or
other-than-temporary) in order to apply the appropriate accounting treatment. For example,
available for sale securities for which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be
other-than-temporary are written down to fair value with the write-down recorded as a realized
loss and included in securities gains (losses) on the income statement rather than as a separate
component of stockholders equity on the balance sheet. Given the recent disruptions in the
financial markets, the decision to recognize other-than-temporary impairment on investment
37
securities has become more difficult as complete information is not always available and market
conditions and other relevant factors are subject to rapid changes. Therefore, the
other-than-temporary impairment assessment has become a critical accounting policy for United. For
additional information on managements consideration of investment valuation and
other-than-temporary impairment, see Note 2, Investment Securities, and Note 11, Fair Value
Measurements, to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
United uses derivative instruments as part of its risk management activities to protect the value
of certain assets and liabilities against adverse price or interest rate movements. All derivative
instruments are carried at fair value on the balance sheet. United considers derivative instruments
to be a critical accounting policy due to the complexity and judgment associated with the
implementation of the accounting guidance and because carrying assets and liabilities at fair value
inherently result in more financial statement volatility. The accounting policies utilized by the
Company to record derivatives reflect the guidance in SFAS No.133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and other related accounting guidance. In accordance with the
guidance, all derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at
fair value. Fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets
and liabilities are provided by third parties. Accounting for changes in the fair value of a
particular derivative differs depending on whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies
as part of a hedging relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. At June 30,
2009, United has one derivative designated as a cash flow hedge and three derivatives designated as
fair value hedges. The application of hedge accounting requires significant judgment to interpret
the relevant accounting guidance, as well as to assess hedge effectiveness, identify similar hedged
item groupings and measure changes in the fair value of the hedged items. At June 30, 2009, United
also has three derivatives not included in hedge relationships. Such derivatives consist of
interest rate swaps used for interest rate management purposes and derivatives executed with
commercial banking customers to facilitate their interest rate management strategies. Gains and
losses on other derivative financial instruments are included in noninterest income and noninterest
expense, respectively. Management believes that its methods of addressing these judgmental areas
and applying the guidance are in accordance with GAAP and consistent with industry practices.
Interpretations of SFAS No.133 and related guidance continue to change and evolve. Future
interpretations could result in material changes to Uniteds accounting for derivative financial
instruments and related hedging activities. Although such changes may not have a material effect on
financial condition, they could have a material adverse effect on Uniteds results of operations in
the period they occur. However, the potential impact to Uniteds operating results for such changes
cannot be reasonably estimated. Additional information relating to Uniteds use of derivatives is
included in Note 10, Derivative Financial Instruments, to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
Uniteds calculation of income tax provision is inherently complex due to the various different tax
laws and jurisdictions in which we operate and requires managements use of estimates and judgments
in its determination. The current income tax liability also includes income tax expense related to
our uncertain tax positions as required in SFAS 109 Accounting for Income Taxes as interpreted by
FASB Interpretation FIN 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Changes to the estimated
accrued taxes can occur due to changes in tax rates, implementation of new business strategies,
resolution of issues with taxing authorities and recently enacted statutory, judicial and
regulatory guidance. These changes can be material to the Companys operating results for any
particular reporting period. The analysis of the income tax provision requires the assessments of
the relative risks and merits of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions, filing positions,
filing methods and taxable income calculations after considering statutes, regulations, judicial
precedent and other information. United strives to keep abreast of changes in the tax laws and the
issuance of regulations which may impact tax reporting and provisions for income tax expense.
United is also subject to audit by federal and state authorities. Because the application of tax
laws is subject to varying interpretations, results of these audits may produce indicated
liabilities which differ from Uniteds estimates and provisions. United continually evaluates its
exposure to possible tax assessments arising from audits and records its estimate of probable
exposure based on current facts and circumstances. The potential impact to Uniteds operating
results for any of the changes cannot be reasonably estimated. See Note 14, Income Taxes, to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements for information regarding Uniteds FIN 48 disclosures.
38
Any material effect on the financial statements related to these critical accounting areas are
further discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
USE OF FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
On January 1, 2008, United adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) to determine
the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in SFAS 157, which also
clarifies that fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the
amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. FAS 157 establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure
of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities
within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs in the methodology for determining fair value
are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-based information obtained from
independent sources (Level 1 or Level 2), while unobservable inputs reflect managements estimate
of market data (Level 3). For assets and liabilities that are actively traded and have quoted
prices or observable market data, a minimal amount of subjectivity concerning fair value is needed.
Prices and values obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced liquidation or
distressed sales are not adjusted by management. When quoted prices or observable market data are
not available, managements judgment is necessary to estimate fair value.
At June 30, 2009, approximately 13.06% of total assets, or $1.02 billion, consisted of financial
instruments recorded at fair value. Of this total, approximately 90.32% or $925.69 million of these
financial instruments used valuation methodologies involving observable market data, collectively
Level 1 and Level 2 measurements, to determine fair value. Approximately 9.68% or $99.26 million of
these financial instruments were valued using unobservable market information or Level 3
measurements. At June 30, 2009, only $14.91 million or less than 1% of total liabilities was
recorded at fair value. This entire amount was valued using methodologies involving observable
market data. United does not believe that any changes in the unobservable inputs used to value the
financial instruments mentioned above would have a material impact on Uniteds results of
operations, liquidity, or capital resources. See Note 11, Fair Value Measurements, to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding SFAS 157 and its impact on
Uniteds financial statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Uniteds total assets as of June 30, 2009 were $7.85 billion which was a decline of $254.58 million
or 3.14% from December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in portfolio
loans, investment securities, and cash and cash equivalents of $124.00 million or 2.06%, $153.60
million or 11.89% and $11.64 million or 5.45%, respectively. The decrease in total assets is
reflected in a corresponding decrease in total liabilities of $274.25 million or 3.72% from
year-end 2008. The decrease in total liabilities was due mainly to a reduction of $351.75 million
or 21.57% in borrowings while accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $10.65 million or
12.64%. Deposits increased $87.96 million or 1.56% from year-end 2008. Shareholders equity
increased $19.67 million or 2.67% from year-end 2008.
The following discussion explains in more detail the changes in financial condition by major
category.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2009 declined $11.64 million or 5.45% from year-end 2008. Of
this total decrease, cash and due from banks decreased $23.98 million or 12.56% while
interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds sold increased $591 thousand and
$11.76 million, respectively. During the first six months of 2009, net cash of $23.73 million and
$253.25 million was provided by operating activities and investing activities, respectively. Net
cash of $288.62 million was used in financing activities. See the unaudited Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for data on cash and cash equivalents provided and used in operating,
investing and financing activities for the first six months of 2009 and 2008.
39
Securities
Total investment securities at June 30, 2009 decreased $153.60 million or 11.89% from year-end
2008. Securities available for sale declined $138.68 million or 12.64%. This change in securities
available for sale reflects $180.11 million in sales, maturities and calls of securities, $34.09
million in purchases, and an increase of $7.73 million in market value. Securities held to maturity
decreased $14.24 million or 12.23% from year-end 2008 due to calls and maturities of securities.
Cash received from the sale, maturities and calls of investment securities was used to repay
borrowings. Other investment securities were relatively flat, only declining $677 thousand or less
than 1% from year-end 2008 due to an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $782 thousand on an
investment security. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities,
including types and remaining maturities, is presented in Note 2 to the unaudited Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans
Loans held for sale increased $11.32 million as loan originations exceeded loan sales in the
secondary market during the first six months of 2009. Portfolio loans, net of unearned income
decreased $124.00 million or 2.06% from year-end 2008 due mainly to a decrease in commercial loans
(not secured by real estate) of $155.10 million or 12.17%. Single-family residential real estate
loans, commercial real estate loans and installment loans were relatively flat from year-end 2008,
declining $3.68 million and increasing $3.72 million and $1.71 million, respectively. All of these
changes were less than 1%. Construction loans and other real estate loans increased $19.67 million
or 3.27% and $8.35 million or 3.40%, respectively.
The following table summarizes the changes in the loan categories since year-end 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
12,191 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
|
$ |
11,323 |
|
|
|
1304.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
|
$ |
1,119,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,274,937 |
|
|
$ |
(155,097 |
) |
|
|
(12.17 |
%) |
Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single family residential |
|
|
1,911,673 |
|
|
|
1,915,355 |
|
|
|
(3,682 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
%) |
Commercial |
|
|
1,651,022 |
|
|
|
1,647,307 |
|
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
621,668 |
|
|
|
601,995 |
|
|
|
19,673 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
Other |
|
|
253,563 |
|
|
|
245,214 |
|
|
|
8,349 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
337,456 |
|
|
|
335,750 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
% |
Less: Unearned income |
|
|
(5,066 |
) |
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
(20.88 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
5,890,156 |
|
|
$ |
6,014,155 |
|
|
$ |
(123,999 |
) |
|
|
(2.06 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a further discussion of loans see Note 3 to the unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Other Assets
Other assets increased $30.01 million or 12.47% from year-end 2008 due mainly to increases of
$22.41 million in OREO due to increased foreclosures as a result of the current economic
conditions, $4.21 million in deferred tax assets and $4.97 million in income taxes receivable. The
increases in deferred tax assets and income taxes receivable for the first six months of 2009 were
due to a tax benefit associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to
income taxes as a result of a concluded state tax examination, respectively. Partially offsetting
these increases from year-end 2008 were decreases in derivatives assets of $2.32 million due to a
change in value and core deposit intangibles of $1.37 million due to amortization.
40
Deposits
Total deposits at June 30, 2009 increased $87.96 million or 1.56% from year-end 2008. In terms of
composition, noninterest-bearing deposits increased $160.11 million or 17.67% while
interest-bearing deposits decreased $72.15 million or 1.52% from December 31, 2008. The increase in
noninterest-bearing deposits was due mainly to increases in commercial noninterest bearing deposits
of $131.36 million or 20.93% and personal noninterest bearing deposits of $7.64 million or 3.15%.
The decrease in interest-bearing deposits was due mainly to a decline in time deposits under
$100,000 of $349.85 million or 18.55%. Most of this decline was due mainly to a shift in
Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) balances to certificate of deposits over
$100,000 as a result of the temporary increase in the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000. Interest bearing money market accounts (MMDAs)
decreased $66.77 million or 4.96%. Time deposits over $100,000 increased $247.86 million or 24.50%.
Regular savings balances increased $22.80 million or 7.07% and interest-bearing checking deposits
increased $73.81 million or 42.16%.
The following table summarizes the changes in the deposit categories since year-end 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
495,398 |
|
|
$ |
419,091 |
|
|
$ |
76,307 |
|
|
|
18.21 |
% |
Interest-bearing checking |
|
|
248,876 |
|
|
|
175,065 |
|
|
|
73,811 |
|
|
|
42.16 |
% |
Regular savings |
|
|
345,276 |
|
|
|
322,478 |
|
|
|
22,798 |
|
|
|
7.07 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,850,502 |
|
|
|
1,833,472 |
|
|
|
17,030 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
% |
Time deposits under $100,000 |
|
|
1,536,407 |
|
|
|
1,886,256 |
|
|
|
(349,849 |
) |
|
|
(18.55 |
%) |
Time deposits over $100,000 |
|
|
1,259,451 |
|
|
|
1,011,592 |
|
|
|
247,859 |
|
|
|
24.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
5,735,910 |
|
|
$ |
5,647,954 |
|
|
$ |
87,956 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
Total borrowings at June 30, 2009 decreased $351.75 million or 21.57% during the first six months
of 2009. Since year-end 2008, short-term borrowings decreased $351.38 million or 45.15% due to a
$212 million reduction in overnight FHLB borrowings and a $123.38 million or 28.40% decrease in
securities under agreements to repurchase. In addition, federal funds purchased decreased $16.07
million or 12.54% since year-end 2008. Long-term borrowings remained fairly flat, decreasing $373
thousand or less than 1% since year-end 2008.
The table below summarizes the change in the borrowing categories since year-end 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
$ |
112,115 |
|
|
$ |
128,185 |
|
|
$ |
(16,070 |
) |
|
|
(12.54 |
%) |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
311,042 |
|
|
|
434,425 |
|
|
|
(123,383 |
) |
|
|
(28.40 |
%) |
Overnight FHLB advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,000 |
|
|
|
(212,000 |
) |
|
|
(100.00 |
%) |
TT&L note option |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
% |
Long-term FHLB advances |
|
|
667,378 |
|
|
|
667,538 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
%) |
Issuances of trust preferred capital securities |
|
|
184,934 |
|
|
|
185,147 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
$ |
1,279,254 |
|
|
$ |
1,631,005 |
|
|
$ |
(351,751 |
) |
|
|
(21.57 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a further discussion of borrowings see Notes 7 and 8 to the unaudited Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
41
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities at June 30, 2009 decreased $10.65 million or 12.64% from
year-end 2008 mainly as a result of a decrease in income taxes payable of $5.37 million due to a
timing difference in payments. In addition, derivative liabilities decreased $4.09 million due to a
change in value and interest payable decreased $2.83 million due to a decline in borrowings. Other
accrued expenses increased $2.39 million.
Shareholders Equity
Shareholders equity at June 30, 2009 increased $19.67 million or 2.67% from December 31, 2008 as
United continued to balance capital adequacy and the return to shareholders. The increase in
shareholders equity was due mainly to earnings net of dividends declared which equaled $12.60
million for the first six months of 2009.
Accumulated other comprehensive income increased $6.78 million due mainly to an increase of $5.02
million, net of deferred income taxes, in the fair value of Uniteds available for sale investment
portfolio. The fair value of Uniteds cash flow hedge increased $772 thousand, net of deferred
taxes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Net income for the first six months of 2009 was $37.79 million or $0.87 per diluted share compared
to $50.84 million or $1.17 per diluted share for the first six months of 2008. Net income for the
second quarter of 2009 was $8.16 million or $0.19 per diluted share, as compared to $25.15 million
or $0.58 per diluted share reported for the prior year second quarter.
Results for the first half and second quarter of 2009 included a credit loss provision of $17.55
million for three loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a
commercial customer that United disclosed in its first quarter 2009 Form 10-Q, an additional
expense accrual of $3.63 million for a special FDIC assessment, and an other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $782 thousand on a specific investment security. All of these expense amounts
are before-taxes. In addition, results for the first half of 2009 included an income tax benefit
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a
positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The total
income tax benefit recorded related to these two events was $11.51 million.
Uniteds annualized return on average assets for the first six months of 2009 was 0.96% and return
on average shareholders equity was 10.07% compared to 1.29% and 13.12% for the first six months of
2008. For the second quarter of 2009, Uniteds annualized return on average assets was 0.41% while
the return on average equity was 4.27% as compared to 1.27% and 12.90%, respectively, for the
second quarter of 2008. Uniteds most recently reported peer group banking companies (bank
holding companies with total assets between $5 and $10 billion) average return on assets was 0.46%
and average return on equity was 4.56% for the first quarter of 2009.
Net interest income for the first six months of 2009 was $123.13 million, a decrease of $2.30
million or 1.84% from the prior years first six months. Net interest income for the second
quarter of 2009 was $62.21 million, a decrease of $943 thousand or 1.49% from prior years second
quarter. The provision for credit losses was $31.28 million and $23.25 million for the first six
months and second quarter of 2009, respectively, as compared to $6.45 million or $4.35 million for
the first six months and second quarter of 2008, respectively.
Noninterest income for the first six months of 2009 was $33.24 million, decreasing $4.55 million or
12.05% from the first six months of 2008. For the second quarter of 2009, noninterest income was
$17.85 million, decreasing $1.33
42
million or 6.95% from the second quarter of 2008. For the first
six months of 2009, noninterest expense increased $4.68 million or
5.65% from the first six months of 2008. For the second quarter of 2009, noninterest expense
increased $4.22 million or 10.18% from the second quarter of 2008.
For the first six months of 2009, United had an income tax benefit of $214 thousand as compared to
income tax expense of $23.09 million for the first half of 2008. During the first quarter of 2009,
United recorded a benefit associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive
adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The total income tax
benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to these two events was $11.51 million.
Excluding the tax expense reduction, income taxes for the first half of 2009 would have been $11.30
million or an effective tax rate of 30.05% as compared to 31.23% for the first half of 2008. Income
taxes for the second quarter of 2009 were $2.95 million as compared to $11.36 million for the
second quarter of 2008. For the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Uniteds effective tax rates
were 26.59% and 31.12%, respectively.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents the primary component of Uniteds earnings. It is the difference
between interest income from earning assets and interest expense incurred to fund these assets.
Net interest income is impacted by changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in market interest rates. Such changes, and their
impact on net interest income in 2009 and 2008, are presented below.
Net interest income for the first six months of 2009 was $123.13 million, a decrease of $2.30
million or 1.84% from the first six months of 2008. The $2.30 million decrease in net interest
income occurred because total interest income declined $32.73 million while total interest expense
only declined $30.42 million from the first six months of 2008. Net interest income for the second
quarter of 2009 was $62.21 million, a decrease of $943 thousand or 1.49% from the second quarter of
2008. The $943 thousand decrease in net interest income occurred because total interest income
declined $13.89 million while total interest expense only declined $12.94 million from the second
quarter of 2008. On a linked-quarter basis, net interest income for the second quarter of 2009
increased $1.29 million or 2.12% from the first quarter of 2009. The $1.29 million increase in net
interest income occurred because total interest income declined $2.17 million while total interest
expense declined $3.47 million from the first quarter of 2009. For the purpose of this remaining
discussion, net interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis to provide a comparison
among all types of interest earning assets. The tax-equivalent basis adjusts for the tax-favored
status of income from certain loans and investments. Although this is a non-GAAP measure, Uniteds
management believes this measure is more widely used within the financial services industry and
provides better comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources.
United uses this measure to monitor net interest income performance and to manage its balance sheet
composition.
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the first half of 2009 was $128.99 million, a decrease of
$4.04 million or 3.04% from the first half of 2008. This decrease in tax-equivalent net interest
income was primarily attributable to a decrease in average tax-exempt loans and securities as well
as one less day for the first six months of 2009 as compared to last years first six months. In
addition, the average yield on earning assets for the first half of 2009 declined 95 basis points
as compared to the first half of 2008. Partially offsetting these decreases to net interest income
was a decrease of 94 basis points in the first half of 2009 average cost of funds. Average earning
assets for the first half of 2009 were virtually flat from the first half of 2008, decreasing $6.96
million or less than 1%. Average net loans grew $160.24 million or 2.79% for the first half of 2009
from the first half of 2008. However, average investments declined $161.30 million or 11.61% from
the first half of 2008 due mainly to maturities and calls of securities and a decline in the fair
value of available for sale securities. The net interest margin for the first half of 2009 was
3.61%, down 11 basis points from a net interest margin of 3.72% for the first half of 2008.
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2009 was $65.11 million, a decrease of
$1.68 million or 2.51% from the second quarter of 2008. This decrease in tax-equivalent net
interest income was primarily attributable
43
to a decline in average earning assets of $106.18 million or 1.47% for the second quarter of 2009. Average net loans grew
$120.13 million or 2.08% for the second quarter of 2009; however, average investments decreased
$216.38 million or 15.46% due mainly to maturities and calls of securities and a decline in the
fair value of available for sale securities. In addition, the average yield on earning assets
declined 75 basis points for the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2008.
Partially offsetting these decreases to tax-equivalent net interest income was a decrease of 76
basis points in the second quarter of 2009 average cost of funds. The net interest margin for the
second quarter of 2009 was 3.67%, down 4 basis points from a net interest margin of 3.71% for the
second quarter of 2008.
On a linked-quarter basis, Uniteds tax-equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of
2009 increased $1.23 million or 1.93% from the first quarter of 2009 due mainly to an 18 basis
point decline in the average cost of funds and one more day in the quarter. Partially offsetting
these increases to net interest income was a decrease of 7 basis points in the second quarter of
2009 average yield on earning assets. In addition, average earning assets decreased $128.09 million
or 1.77% for the quarter as average investments declined $88.70 million or 6.97%. Average net loans
were relatively flat from the first quarter of 2009, decreasing $38.95 million or less than 1%. The
net interest margin of 3.67% for the second quarter of 2009 was an increase of 11 basis points from
the net interest margin of 3.56% for the first quarter of 2009.
The following tables reconcile the difference between net interest income and tax-equivalent net
interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2009, June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2009 and the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, GAAP basis |
|
$ |
62,209 |
|
|
$ |
63,152 |
|
|
$ |
60,917 |
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment (1) |
|
|
2,902 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
$ |
65,111 |
|
|
$ |
66,790 |
|
|
$ |
63,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, GAAP basis |
|
$ |
123,126 |
|
|
$ |
125,430 |
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment (1) |
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
7,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income |
|
$ |
128,992 |
|
|
$ |
133,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The tax-equivalent adjustment combines amounts of interest income on federally
nontaxable loans and investment securities using the statutory federal income tax rate
of 35% and interest income on state nontaxable loans and investment securities using
the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75%. |
The following tables show the unaudited consolidated daily average balance of major categories of
assets and liabilities for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, with the interest and rate earned or paid on such amount. The interest income and
yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent
basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. The interest income and yield on state
nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the
statutory state income tax rate of 8.75%.
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities repurchased
under agreements to resell and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
32,925 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
$ |
42,861 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
Investment Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,011,364 |
|
|
|
12,307 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
1,184,433 |
|
|
|
14,868 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
% |
Tax-exempt (1) (2) |
|
|
172,217 |
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
215,523 |
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
7.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
1,183,581 |
|
|
|
15,500 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
1,399,956 |
|
|
|
18,870 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
% |
Loans, net of unearned income (1) (2) (3) |
|
|
5,948,286 |
|
|
|
79,925 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
% |
|
|
5,822,175 |
|
|
|
90,967 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(62,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
5,885,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
5,765,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
7,102,032 |
|
|
$ |
95,434 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
7,208,212 |
|
|
$ |
110,057 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
798,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
7,900,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,985,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
4,690,644 |
|
|
$ |
20,924 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
$ |
4,507,731 |
|
|
$ |
30,183 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
494,605 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
918,710 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
% |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
860,377 |
|
|
|
9,303 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
854,010 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest-Bearing Funds |
|
|
6,045,626 |
|
|
|
30,323 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
6,280,451 |
|
|
|
43,267 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,025,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
63,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
7,134,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,201,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
766,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
7,900,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,985,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
65,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST SPREAD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.36 |
% |
NET INTEREST MARGIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest income and the yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities
are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest income and the yields on state nontaxable loans and investment securities are
presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75%. |
|
(3) |
|
Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding. |
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg. |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities repurchased
under agreements to resell and other
short-term investments |
|
$ |
33,144 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
$ |
39,043 |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
% |
Investment Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,051,900 |
|
|
|
26,105 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
% |
|
|
1,166,198 |
|
|
|
30,021 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
Tax-exempt (1) (2) |
|
|
175,786 |
|
|
|
6,392 |
|
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
222,789 |
|
|
|
8,413 |
|
|
|
7.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
1,227,686 |
|
|
|
32,497 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
% |
|
|
1,388,987 |
|
|
|
38,434 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
% |
Loans, net of unearned income (1) (2) (3) |
|
|
5,966,934 |
|
|
|
160,560 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5,798,360 |
|
|
|
188,637 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(62,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
5,904,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
5,744,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
7,165,724 |
|
|
$ |
193,103 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
7,172,685 |
|
|
$ |
227,563 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
790,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
7,956,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,954,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
4,706,150 |
|
|
$ |
45,158 |
|
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
$ |
4,491,321 |
|
|
$ |
65,312 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
566,308 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
955,028 |
|
|
|
10,580 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
879,437 |
|
|
|
18,612 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
816,945 |
|
|
|
18,643 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest-Bearing Funds |
|
|
6,151,895 |
|
|
|
64,111 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
% |
|
|
6,263,294 |
|
|
|
94,535 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
980,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
66,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
7,199,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,174,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
756,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
779,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
7,956,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,954,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
133,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST SPREAD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
NET INTEREST MARGIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest income and the yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities
are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%.
|
|
(2) |
|
The interest income and the yields on state nontaxable loans and investment securities are
presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75%. |
|
(3) |
|
Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding. |
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses for the first six months of 2009 and 2008 was $31.28 million and
$6.45 million, respectively. For the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the provision for
credit losses was $23.25 million and $4.35 million, respectively. The increase in the provision
for credit losses for 2009 was due mainly to the previously mentioned provision of $17.55 million
for loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a commercial customer as
well as increases in nonperforming assets, loan charge-offs and inherent risk factors as a result
46
of the current economic environment. Net charge-offs for the first six months of 2009 were $28.35 million as
compared to $6.03 million for the first six months of 2008. Net charge-offs were $21.40 million for
the second quarter of 2009 as compared to net charge-offs of $4.24 million for the same quarter in
2008. Net charge-offs for the second quarter and first half of 2009 included $17.55 million for the
loans with fraudulent collateral. Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans were
1.44% and 0.96% for the second quarter and first half of 2009, respectively. On a linked-quarter
basis, Uniteds provision for credit losses and net charge-offs increased $15.22 million and $14.45
million, respectively, from the first quarter of 2009 due to the provision and charge-offs related
to the loans with fraudulent collateral. Uniteds most recently reported peer group banking
companies (bank holding companies with total assets between $5 and $10 billion) net charge-offs to
average loans percentage was 0.94% for the first quarter of 2009.
At June 30, 2009, nonperforming loans were $60.45 million or 1.03% of loans, net of unearned
income, up from nonperforming loans of $54.20 million or 0.90% of loans, net of unearned income at
December 31, 2008. Nonperforming loans include loans on which no interest is currently being
accrued, principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more and for which
the terms have been modified due to deterioration in the financial position of the borrower. At
June 30, 2009, nonaccrual loans were $42.83 million which was flat from $42.32 million at year-end
2008. Loans past due 90 days or more were $16.53 million at June 30, 2009, an increase of $4.65
million or 39.15% from $11.88 million at year-end 2008. The increase was due mainly to loans
totaling $4.35 million to four customers becoming past due 90 days or more at June 30, 2009.
Restructured loans for which terms have been modified due to deterioration in the financial
position of the borrower were $1.10 million at June 30, 2009. The increase in nonperforming loans
since year-end 2008 is indicative of the current economic conditions. High unemployment levels and
economic fears have impacted the performance of both consumer and commercial portfolios. The loss
potential on these loans has been properly evaluated and allocated within the companys allowance
for loan losses. Total nonperforming assets of $102.68 million, including OREO of $42.22 million at
June 30, 2009, represented an increase of $28.66 million or 38.72% from year-end 2008. OREO
comprised the majority of the increase, up $22.41 million in comparison to December 31, 2008. Total
nonperforming assets represented 1.31% of total assets at the end of June 30, 2009 which compares
favorably to the most recently reported percentage of 1.68% at March 31, 2009 for Uniteds peer
group. For a summary of nonperforming assets, see Note 5 to the unaudited Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
At June 30, 2009, impaired loans were $52.38 million, which was a decrease of $7.36 million or
12.33% from the $59.74 million in impaired loans at December 31, 2008. This decrease in impaired
loans was due mainly to charge-offs of prior impaired loan balances or the movement of impaired
loans secured by real estate to OREO. For further details regarding impaired loans, see Note 5 to
the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
United maintains an allowance for loan losses and an allowance for lending-related commitments.
The combined allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments are referred to as the
allowance for credit losses. United evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and
its loan administration policies are focused upon the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio.
Uniteds process for evaluating the allowance is a formal company-wide process that focuses on
early identification of potential problem credits and procedural discipline in managing and
accounting for those credits. This process determines the appropriate level of the allowance for
credit losses, allocation among loan types and lending-related commitments, and the resulting
provision for credit losses.
At June 30, 2009, the allowance for credit losses was $66.53 million as compared to $63.60 million
at December 31, 2008. As a percentage of loans, net of unearned income, the allowance for credit
losses was 1.13% at June 30, 2009 and 1.06% of loans, net of unearned income at December 31, 2008.
The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans was 110.06% and 117.35% at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. This ratio indicates coverage of nonperforming loans
by the allowance for credit losses decreased as a result of a $6.25 million or 11.54% increase in
nonperforming loans during the first six months of 2009. As previously mentioned, this increase in
47
nonperforming loans was attributable to a $4.65 million increase within the 90 days past due
component. The increase was due mainly to loans totaling $4.35 million to four customers becoming
past due 90 days or more at June 30, 2009. Risk grade adjustments and qualitative risk factors within the allowance for loan loss analysis were
determined in accordance with delinquency and loss trends of such loans resulting in increased
allowance allocations of $3.3 million or 5.6%, however, not to the same degree as the overall
increase in nonperforming loans. The Companys detailed methodology and analysis did not indicate a
corresponding increase in the allowance for loan losses primarily because of the estimated fair
value of the underlying collateral of loans considered impaired. The impaired loans are included in
nonperforming loans and charge-offs recorded in the first six months of 2009 on nonperforming loans
for which the Company had previously specifically allocated allowance. The first six months of 2009
charge-offs resulted in a decrease of $1.6 million in such specific allocations, which had a
greater impact on the allowance than the increase in nonperforming loans.
Allocations are made for specific commercial loans based upon managements estimate of the
borrowers ability to repay and other factors impacting collectibility. Other commercial loans not
specifically reviewed on an individual basis are evaluated based on historical loss percentages
applied to loan pools that have been segregated by risk. Allocations for loans other than
commercial loans are made based upon historical loss experience adjusted for current conditions.
The allowance for credit losses includes estimated probable inherent but undetected losses within
the portfolio due to uncertainties in economic conditions, delays in obtaining information,
including unfavorable information about a borrowers financial condition, the difficulty in
identifying triggering events that correlate perfectly to subsequent loss rates, and risk factors
that have not yet fully manifested themselves in loss allocation factors. In addition, a portion
of the allowance accounts for the inherent imprecision in the allowance for credit losses analysis.
Over the past several years, United has grown through acquisition, and accordingly, expanded the
geographic area in which it operates. As a result, historical loss experience data used to
establish allocation estimates might not precisely correspond to the current portfolio in these
other geographic areas.
Uniteds formal company-wide review of the allowance for loan loss at June 30, 2009 produced
increased allocations in all of the four loan categories. The components of the allowance allocated
to commercial loans increased by $659 thousand due to the impact of downward risk grade migration
that resulted in higher loss rates being applied to loan pool subsets within the portfolio.
Offsetting these factors somewhat was a decrease in impaired loan specific allocations of $1.6
million. Real estate loan pool allocations increased $1.9 million also as a result of increases in
historical loss rates and to recognize the loss inherent with respect to declining market values
and its effect upon residential exposure in selected markets within the banks Washington, D.C.
metropolitan area / Shenandoah Valley footprint. The real estate construction loan pool allocations
increased $759 thousand in comparison with the December 31, 2008 year-end primarily due to
increased historical loss rates and a $418 thousand increase in specific allocations for impaired
loans. The components of the allowance allocated to consumer loans increased by $18 thousand due to
an increase in historical loss rates. The allowance for lending-related commitments increased by
$203 thousand due to higher usage factors and higher historical loss rates.
An allowance is established for probable credit losses on impaired loans via specific allocations.
Nonperforming commercial loans and leases are regularly reviewed to identify impairment. A loan or
lease is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the bank will
not be able to collect all amounts contractually due. Measuring impairment of a loan requires
judgment and estimates, and the eventual outcomes may differ from those estimates. Impairment is
measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the
loans effective rate, the loans observable market price or the fair value of collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. When the selected measure is less than the recorded investment in the
loan, an impairment has occurred. The allowance for impaired loans was $4.2 million at June 30 2009
and $5.4 million at December 31, 2008. Compared to the prior year-end, this element of the
allowance decreased by $1.2 million due to decreased commercial loan pool specific allocations.
48
An allowance is also recognized for imprecision inherent in loan loss migration models and other
estimates of loss. There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses and allowance for
lending-related commitments; some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment.
Although management believes its methodology for determining the
allowance adequately considers all of the potential factors to identify and quantify probable
losses in the portfolio, the process includes subjective elements and is therefore susceptible to
change. This estimate for imprecision has been established to recognize the variance, within a
reasonable margin, of the loss estimation process. The estimate for imprecision decreased at June
30, 2009 by $608 thousand to $2.1 million. This represents 3.2% of the banks total allowance for
credit loss and in as much as this variance approximates a pre determined narrow parameter, the
methodology has confirmed that the Banks allowance for credit loss is at an appropriate level.
Management believes that the allowance for credit losses of $66.53 million at June 30, 2009 is
adequate to provide for probable losses on existing loans and loan-related commitments based on
information currently available. Note 4 to the accompanying unaudited Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements provides a progression of the allowance for credit losses.
Uniteds loan administration policies are focused on the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio
in terms of loan approval and credit quality. The commercial loan portfolio is monitored for
possible concentrations of credit in one or more industries. Management has lending limits as a
percentage of capital per type of credit concentration in an effort to ensure adequate
diversification within the portfolio. Most of Uniteds commercial loans are secured by real estate
located in West Virginia, southeastern Ohio, Virginia and Maryland. It is the opinion of
management that these commercial loans do not pose any unusual risks and that adequate
consideration has been given to these loans in establishing the allowance for credit losses.
Management is not aware of any potential problem loans, trends or uncertainties, which it
reasonably expects, will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital
resources which have not been disclosed. Additionally, management has disclosed all known material
credits, which cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to
comply with the loan repayment schedules.
Other Income
Other income consists of all revenues, which are not included in interest and fee income related to
earning assets. Noninterest income has been and will continue to be an important factor for
improving Uniteds profitability. Recognizing the importance, management continues to evaluate
areas where noninterest income can be enhanced.
Noninterest income was $33.24 million for the first six months of 2009, down $4.55 million or
12.05% when compared to the first six months of 2008. For the second quarter of 2009, noninterest
income was $17.85 million, a decrease of $1.33 million or 6.95% from the second quarter of 2008.
The largest change within noninterest income between the respective time periods was due to
investment securities transactions.
Net losses on investment securities transactions for the first six months of 2009 were $1.23
million as compared to net gains of $909 thousand for the first six months of 2008. The net losses
on investment securities transactions for the first six months of 2009 consisted mainly of noncash
before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.23 million on investment securities
including $782 thousand on one security carried at cost. Included in net gains on security
transactions for the first six months of 2008 was a $917 thousand before-tax gain related to Visas
initial public offering and the partial redemption of Visa shares held by United. Excluding the
results of security transactions, noninterest income for the first six months of 2009 would have
decreased $2.42 million or 6.56% from the same period in 2008. For the second quarter of 2009, net
losses on investment securities transactions were $1.30 million as compared to net losses of $46
thousand for the second quarter of 2008. Excluding the results of security transactions,
noninterest income for the second quarter of 2009 would have been flat from the second quarter of
2008, declining $84 thousand or less than 1%.
49
Revenue from trust and brokerage services for the first six months of 2009 decreased $1.39 million
or 16.39% from the first six months of 2008. Revenue from trust and brokerage services was $7.10
million for the first six months of 2009 as compared to $8.49 million for the first six months of 2008. For the second quarter of 2009,
revenue from trust and brokerage services dropped $1.05 million or 23.00% from the prior years
second quarter. Revenue from trust and brokerage services was $3.51 million for the second quarter
of 2009 as compared to $4.55 million for the second quarter of 2008. The decrease in trust and
brokerage services was due mainly to a decrease in the value of the trust assets under management.
Fees from deposit services for the first six months of 2009 were $19.56 million, an increase of
$473 thousand or 2.48% from the first six months of 2008 mainly as a result of the High Performance
Checking program. For the second quarter of 2009, fees from deposit services were $10.26 million,
an increase of $253 thousand or 2.53% as compared to the same period in 2008. In particular, card
fees increased $246 thousand and $115 thousand, insufficient funds (NSF) fees increased $39
thousand and $66 thousand, and ATM fees increased $74 thousand and $38 thousand during the first
six months and second quarter of 2009, respectively.
Income from bank-owned life insurance decreased $1.08 million or 46.66% for the first six months of
2009 as compared the first six months of 2008. However, income from bank-owned life insurance
increased $328 thousand for second quarter of 2009 as compared to last years income during the
same period due to changes in the cash surrender value.
Mortgage banking income increased $55 thousand or 22.09% and $11 thousand or 7.05% for the first
six months and second quarter of 2009 from the same periods in 2008 due to increased mortgage loan
sales in the secondary market. Mortgage loan sales were $37.69 million in the first six months of
2009 as compared to $21.73 million in the first six months of 2008. Mortgage loan sales were
$27.68 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $10.83 million in the second quarter of
2008.
Fees from bankcard services declined $1.31 million or 39.82% and $676 thousand or 38.99% due mainly
to a lower volume of spending by consumers as a result of the current economic conditions. Fees
from bankcard services were $1.98 million and $1.06 million for the first half and second quarter
of 2009, respectively, as compared to $3.29 million and $1.73 million, respectively, for the first
half and second quarter of 2008.
Other income increased $940 thousand and $1.11 million for the first six months and second quarter
of 2009, respectively. This increase in other income is due mainly to an increase of $959 thousand
and $1.22 million for the first six months and second quarter of 2009, respectively, from
derivatives not in a hedging relationship. A corresponding amount of expense is included in other
expense in the income statement. Income from the outsourcing of official checks processing for the
first six months and second quarter of 2009 decreased $381 thousand and $148 thousand,
respectively, over the same periods last year. The outsourcing of official checks processing was
discontinued in 2008 and brought in-house.
On a linked-quarter basis, noninterest income for the second quarter of 2009 increased $2.46
million or 15.98% from the first quarter of 2009. Included in the results for the second quarter of
2009 was an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.14 million on investment securities.
Excluding the results of security transactions, noninterest income would have increased $3.82
million or 24.96% on a linked-quarter basis due primarily to an increase in income from bank-owned
life insurance policies of $1.44 million as a result of an increase in the cash surrender value and
an increase in income from derivatives not in hedge relationships of $1.64 million due to a change
in fair value between the respective periods. A similar amount of expense related to the change in
the fair value of other derivative financial instruments is included in other expense in the income
statement. In addition, fees from deposit services increased $952 thousand due mainly to the High
Performance Checking program.
50
Other Expenses
Just as management continues to evaluate areas where noninterest income can be enhanced, it strives
to improve the efficiency of its operations to reduce costs. Other expenses include all items of
expense other than interest expense, the provision for loan losses, and income taxes. For the first six months of 2009, noninterest expenses
increased $4.68 million or 5.65% from the first six months of 2008. Noninterest expenses increased
$4.22 million or 10.18% for the second quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Employee compensation declined $1.28 million or 4.13% and $783 thousand or 5.04% for the first half
and second quarter of 2009, respectively, when compared to the same time periods in 2008. The
declines were due mainly to less commission and incentives expense. Also included in salaries and
benefits expense for the first six months and second quarter of 2009 was expense for stock options
of $273 thousand and $137 thousand, respectively, as compared to $277 thousand and $141 thousand
for the first six months and second quarter of 2008, respectively.
Employee benefits expense for the first six months and second quarter of 2009 increased $2.63
million or 37.65% and $1.33 million or 38.95% from the first six months of 2008. Specifically
within employee benefits expense, pension expense increased $3.00 million and $1.50 million for the
first six months and second quarter of 2009, respectively.
Net occupancy expense for the first six months of 2009 increased $435 thousand or 5.26% from the
first six months of 2008. The increase was due mainly to additional utilities expense, building
depreciation and real property taxes. Net occupancy expense for the second quarter of 2009
increased $180 thousand or 4.53% from the second quarter of 2008 due to increased building
maintenance and rental expenses.
Equipment expense for the first six months of 2009 including other real estate owned (OREO),
increased $738 thousand or 17.23% from the first six months of 2008 due mainly to an increase in
losses due to a deterioration in property values associated with OREO. Equipment expense for the
second quarter of 2009 decreased $233 thousand or 9.36% from the second quarter of 2008 due to a
decrease in OREO expenses.
Data processing expense increased $82 thousand or 1.58% and $242 thousand or 10.10% for the first
six months and second quarter of 2009, respectively, as compared to the first six months and second quarter of
2008.
Bankcard processing expense for the first half and second quarter of 2009 declined $1.23 million or
43.65% and $629 thousand or 42.82%, respectively, from the first half and second quarter of 2008
due to a decline in the volume of customer spending as a result of the current economic conditions.
FDIC insurance expense for the first half and second quarter of 2009 increased $4.56 million and
$4.13 million from the first half and second quarter of 2008, respectively. The increases were due
mainly to the previously mentioned additional expense accrual of $3.63 million in the second
quarter of 2009 for a special assessment by the FDIC to increase the insurance fund for banks.
Other expense decreased $1.26 million or 5.26% for the first six months 2009 as compared to the
first six months of 2008 due primarily to decreases in several general operating expenses such as
postage, advertising, telephone and business franchise taxes. In addition, amortization of core
deposit intangibles for the first six months of 2009 decreased $592 thousand from the first six
months of 2008. Expense from derivatives not in hedge relationships increased $959 thousand for the
first six months of 2009 as compared to the first six months of 2008 due to a change in their fair
value. Other expense for the second quarter of 2009 was flat from the second quarter of 2008,
declining $16 thousand or less than 1%.
51
On a linked-quarter basis, noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2009 increased $3.88
million or 9.29% due mainly to the $3.63 million additional expense accrual for a special FDIC
assessment. In addition, expense from derivatives not in hedge relationships increased $1.64
million due to a change in fair value. Employee compensation and employee benefits expense
decreased $196 thousand or 1.31% and $155 thousand or 3.17% due to a slight decline in employees.
Equipment expense declined $510 thousand or 18.44% due mainly to lower OREO losses and net
occupancy expense declined $398 thousand or 8.74% due to a decline in utilities expense.
Income Taxes
For the first half of 2009, United had an income tax benefit of $214 thousand as compared to income
tax expense of $23.09 million for the first half of 2008. Income taxes for the second quarter of
2009 were $2.95 million as compared to $11.36 million for the second quarter of 2008. For the
quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Uniteds effective tax rates were 26.59% and 31.12%,
respectively. During the first quarter of 2009, United recorded a benefit associated with net
operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a
concluded tax examination. The total income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009
related to these two events was $11.51 million. Excluding the tax expense reduction, income taxes
for the first half of 2009 would have been $11.30 million or an effective tax rate of 30.05% as
compared to 31.23% for the first half of 2008.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
United has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, that
may require future cash payments. Please refer to Uniteds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 for disclosures with respect to Uniteds fixed and determinable contractual
obligations. There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business since
year-end 2008 in the specified contractual obligations disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On January 1, 2007, United adopted the provisions of FIN 48. As of June 30, 2009, United recorded a
liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, of $1.55 million in
accordance with FIN 48. This liability represents an estimate of tax positions that United has
taken in its tax returns which may ultimately not be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.
Since the ultimate amount and timing of any future cash settlements cannot be predicted with
reasonable certainty, this estimated liability is excluded from the contractual obligations table.
United also enters into derivative contracts, mainly to protect against adverse interest rate
movements on the value of certain assets or liabilities, under which it is required to either pay
cash to or receive cash from counterparties depending on changes in interest rates. Derivative
contracts are carried at fair value and not notional value on the consolidated balance sheet.
Further discussion of derivative instruments is presented in Note 10 to the unaudited Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
United is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan
commitments and standby letters of credit. Uniteds maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument for the loan commitments and standby
letters of credit is the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. United uses the same
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the
total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Further discussion
of off-balance sheet commitments is included in Note 9 to the unaudited Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
52
Liquidity
In the opinion of management, United maintains liquidity that is sufficient to satisfy its
depositors requirements and the credit needs of its customers. Like all banks, United depends
upon its ability to renew maturing deposits and other liabilities on a daily basis and to acquire
new funds in a variety of markets. A significant source of funds available to United is core
deposits. Core deposits include certain demand deposits, statement and special savings and NOW
accounts. These deposits are relatively stable, and they are the lowest cost source of funds
available to United. Short-term borrowings have also been a significant source of funds. These
include federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase as well as
advances from the FHLB. Repurchase agreements represent funds which are obtained as the result of a
competitive bidding process.
Liquid assets are cash and those items readily convertible to cash. All banks must maintain
sufficient balances of cash and near-cash items to meet the day-to-day demands of customers and
Uniteds cash needs. Other than cash and due from banks, the available for sale securities
portfolio and maturing loans are the primary sources of liquidity.
The goal of liquidity management is to ensure the ability to access funding which enables United to
efficiently satisfy the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and meet Uniteds cash
needs. Liquidity is managed by monitoring funds availability from a number of primary sources.
Substantial funding is available from cash and cash equivalents, unused short-term borrowing and a
geographically dispersed network of branches providing access to a diversified and substantial
retail deposit market.
Short-term needs can be met through a wide array of outside sources such as correspondent and
downstream correspondent federal funds and utilization of Federal Home Loan Bank advances.
Other sources of liquidity available to United to provide long-term as well as short-term funding
alternatives, in addition to FHLB advances, are long-term certificates of deposit, lines of credit,
borrowings that are secured by bank premises or stock of Uniteds subsidiaries and issuances of
trust preferred securities. In the normal course of business, United, through its Asset Liability
Committee, evaluates these as well as other alternative funding strategies that may be utilized to
meet short-term and long-term funding needs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash of $23.73 million was provided by operating activities
due mainly to net income of $37.79 million for the first six months of 2009. Net cash of $253.25
million was provided by investing activities which was primarily due to net cash received of
$160.06 million for excess net proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investment securities
over purchases and the net repayment of $96.15 million in portfolio loans. During the first six
months of 2009, net cash of $288.62 million was used in financing activities due primarily to the
repayment of overnight FHLB borrowings in the amount of $212 million during the first six months of
2009. Other uses of cash for financing activities included the repayment of federal funds purchased
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $16.07 million and $123.38 million,
respectively, and the payment of $25.18 million for cash dividends. Cash provided by financing
activities included a growth in deposits of $87.96 million. The net effect of the cash flow
activities was a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $11.64 million for the first six months
of 2009.
United anticipates it can meet its obligations over the next 12 months and has no material
commitments for capital expenditures. There are no known trends, demands, commitments, or events
that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in Uniteds liquidity increasing or
decreasing in any material way. United also has significant lines of credit available. See Notes 7
and 8 to the accompanying unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more details
regarding the amounts available to United under line of credit.
The Asset Liability Committee monitors liquidity to ascertain that a liquidity position within
certain prescribed parameters is maintained. No changes are anticipated in the policies of Uniteds Asset Liability Committee.
53
Capital Resources
Uniteds capital position is financially sound. United seeks to maintain a proper relationship
between capital and total assets to support growth and sustain earnings. United has historically
generated attractive returns on shareholders equity. Based on regulatory requirements, United and
its banking subsidiaries are categorized as well capitalized institutions. Uniteds risk-based
capital ratios of 11.49% at June 30, 2009 and 10.99% at December 31, 2008, were both significantly
higher than the minimum regulatory requirements. Uniteds Tier I capital and leverage ratios of
10.34% and 8.89%, respectively, at June 30, 2009, are also well above regulatory minimum
requirements.
Total shareholders equity was $756.38 million, an increase of $19.67 million or 2.67% from
December 31, 2008. Uniteds equity to assets ratio was 9.64% at June 30, 2009 as compared to 9.09%
at December 31, 2008. The primary capital ratio, capital and reserves to total assets and reserves,
was 10.40% at June 30, 2009 as compared to 9.80% at December 31, 2008. Uniteds average equity to
average asset ratio was 9.70% and 9.82% for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. For the first six months of 2009 and 2008, the average equity to average assets ratio
was 9.51% and 9.80%, respectively. All of these financial measurements reflect a financially sound
position.
During the second quarter of 2009, Uniteds Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.29
per share. Cash dividends were $0.58 per common share for the first six months of 2009. Total cash
dividends declared were $12.60 million for the second quarter of 2009 and $25.19 million for the
first six months of 2009 which was relatively flat from the second quarter and first six months of
2008.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The objective of Uniteds Asset Liability Management function is to maintain consistent growth in
net interest income within Uniteds policy guidelines. This objective is accomplished through the
management of balance sheet liquidity and interest rate risk exposures due to changes in economic
conditions, interest rate levels and customer preferences.
Interest Rate Risk
Management considers interest rate risk to be Uniteds most significant market risk. Interest rate
risk is the exposure to adverse changes in Uniteds net interest income as a result of changes in
interest rates. Uniteds earnings are largely dependent on the effective management of interest
rate risk.
Management of interest rate risk focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income
within Board-approved policy limits. Uniteds Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which
includes senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and
manages interest rate risk to maintain an acceptable level of change to net interest income as a
result of changes in interest rates. Policy established for interest rate risk is stated in terms
of the change in net interest income over a one-year and two-year horizon given an immediate and
sustained increase or decrease in interest rates. The current limits approved by the Board of
Directors are structured on a staged basis with each stage requiring specific actions.
United employs a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage its exposure to changing
interest rates. One such technique utilizes an earnings simulation model to analyze the
sensitivity of net interest income to movements in interest rates. The model is based on actual
cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates
market-based assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on the prepayment rate of
certain assets and liabilities. The model also includes executive management projections for
activity levels in product lines offered by United. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of
deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the
model. Rate scenarios could involve parallel or nonparallel shifts in the yield curve, depending on
historical, current, and expected conditions, as well as the need to
54
capture any material effects of explicit or embedded options. These assumptions are inherently
uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely
predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will
differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as
well as changes in market conditions and managements strategies.
Interest sensitive assets and liabilities are defined as those assets or liabilities that mature or
are repriced within a designated time frame. The principal function of interest rate risk
management is to maintain an appropriate relationship between those assets and liabilities that are
sensitive to changing market interest rates. The difference between rate sensitive assets and rate
sensitive liabilities for specified periods of time is known as the GAP. Earnings-simulation
analysis captures not only the potential of these interest sensitive assets and liabilities to
mature or reprice but also the probability that they will do so. Moreover, earnings-simulation
analysis considers the relative sensitivities of these balance sheet items and projects their
behavior over an extended period of time. United closely monitors the sensitivity of its assets and
liabilities on an on-going basis and projects the effect of various interest rate changes on its
net interest margin.
The following table shows Uniteds estimated earnings sensitivity profile as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
Percentage Change in Net Interest Income |
(basis points) |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
+200 |
|
|
6.80 |
% |
|
|
7.60 |
% |
+100 |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
4.58 |
% |
-100 |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
-0.50 |
% |
-200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, given an immediate, sustained 100 basis point upward shock to the yield curve
used in the simulation model, net interest income for United is estimated to increase by 2.49% over
one year as compared to an increase of 4.58% at December 31, 2008. A 200 basis point immediate,
sustained upward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest income by an estimated 6.80%
over one year as of June 30, 2009, as compared to an increase of 7.60% as of December 31, 2008. A
100 basis point immediate, sustained downward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest
income by an estimated 2.22% over one year as of June 30, 2009, as compared to a decrease of 0.50%
as of December 31, 2008. With the federal funds rate at 0.25% at June 30, 2009, and December 31,
2008, management believed a 200 basis point immediate, sustained decline in rates was highly
unlikely.
This analysis does not include the potential increased refinancing activities, which should lessen
the negative impact on net income from falling rates. While it is unlikely market rates would
immediately move 100 or 200 basis points upward or downward on a sustained basis, this is another
tool used by management and the Board of Directors to gauge interest rate risk. All of these
estimated changes in net interest income are and were within the policy guidelines established by
the Board of Directors.
To further aid in interest rate management, Uniteds subsidiary banks are members of the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB). The use of FHLB advances provides United with a low risk means of matching
maturities of earning assets and interest-bearing funds to achieve a desired interest rate spread
over the life of the earning assets. In addition, United uses credit with large regional banks and
trust preferred securities to provide funding.
As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, United may use derivative instruments to
protect against adverse price or interest rate movements on the value of certain assets or
liabilities and on future cash flows. These derivatives commonly consist of interest rate swaps,
caps, floors, collars, futures, forward contracts, written and purchased options. Interest rate
swaps obligate two parties to exchange one or more payments generally calculated with reference to
a fixed or variable rate of interest applied to the notional amount. United accounts for its
derivative activities in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities.
55
During 1999, to better manage risk, United sold fixed-rate residential mortgage loans in a
securitization transaction. In that securitization, United retained a subordinated interest that
represented Uniteds right to future cash flows arising after third party investors in the
securitization trust have received the return for which they contracted. United does not receive
annual servicing fees from this securitization because the loans are serviced by an independent
third-party. The investors and the securitization trust have no recourse to Uniteds other assets
for failure of debtors to pay when due; however, Uniteds retained interests are subordinate to
investors interests. At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the fair values of the subordinated interest and
the cost of the available for sale securities were zero. However, United continues to receive
payments from the securitization trust, which is recorded as income when the cash is received.
During the first six months of 2009, United received cash of $637 thousand from its subordinated
interest in the securitization and recognized income of the same amount in the period.
At June 30, 2009, the principal balances of the residential mortgage loans held in the
securitization trust were approximately $5.11 million. Principal amounts owed to third party
investors and to United in the securitization were approximately $1.94 million and $3.17 million,
respectively, at June 30, 2009. The weighted average term to maturity of the underlying mortgages
approximated 9.10 years as of June 30, 2009.
The amount of future cash flows from Uniteds subordinated interest is highly dependent upon future
prepayments and defaults. Accordingly, the amount and timing of future cash flows to United is
uncertain at this time.
The following table presents quantitative information about delinquencies, net credit losses, and
components of the underlying securitized fixed-rate residential mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Total principal amount of loans |
|
$ |
5,112 |
|
|
$ |
5,886 |
|
Principal amount of loans
60 days or more past due |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Year-to-date average balances |
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
6,616 |
|
Year-to-date net credit (recoveries) losses |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
Extension Risk
A key feature of most mortgage loans is the ability of the borrower to repay principal earlier than
scheduled. This is called a prepayment. Prepayments arise primarily due to sale of the underlying
property, refinancing, or foreclosure. In general, declining interest rates tend to increase
prepayments, and rising interest rates tend to slow prepayments. Like other fixed-income
securities, when interest rates rise, the value of mortgage- related securities generally decline.
The rate of prepayments on underlying mortgages will affect the price and volatility of
mortgage-related securities and may shorten or extend the effective maturity of the security beyond
what was anticipated at the time of purchase. If interest rates rise, Uniteds holdings of
mortgage- related securities may experience reduced returns if the borrowers of the underlying
mortgages pay off their mortgages later than anticipated. This is generally referred to as
extension risk.
At June 30, 2009, Uniteds mortgage related securities portfolio had an amortized cost of $747
million, of which approximately $546 million or 73% were fixed rate collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs). These fixed rate CMOs consisted primarily of planned amortization class (PACs),
sequential-pay and accretion directed (VADMs) bonds having an average life of approximately 2 years
and a weighted average yield of 4.83%, under current projected prepayment assumptions. These
securities are expected to have very little extension risk in a rising rate environment. Current
models show that given an immediate, sustained upward shock, the average life of these securities
would only extend to 2.7 years. The projected price decline of the fixed rate CMO portfolio in
rates up 300 basis points would be 6.3%, less than the price decline
of a 3-year treasury note. By
comparison, the price decline of a 30-year current coupon
56
mortgage backed security (MBS) in rates higher by 300 basis points would be approximately 15%.
United had approximately $110 million in 15-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield
of 4.68% and a projected average life of 3.4 years as of June 30, 2009. This portfolio consisted of
seasoned 15-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (WALA) of 4.3 years and a weighted
average maturity (WAM) of 10.3 years.
United had approximately $28 million in 20-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield
of 4.77% and a projected average life of 4.2 years on June 30, 2009. This portfolio consisted of
seasoned 20-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (WALA) of 5.4 years and a weighted
average maturity (WAM) of 14.1 years.
United had approximately $13 million in 30-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield
of 6.48% and a projected average life of 4.0 years on June 30, 2009. This portfolio consisted of
seasoned 30-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (WALA) of 9.7 years and a weighted
average maturity (WAM) of 18.4 years.
The remaining 7% of the mortgage related securities portfolio at June 30, 2009, included adjustable
rate securities (ARMs), balloon securities, and 10-year mortgage backed pass-through securities.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of June 30, 2009, an evaluation was performed under the supervision of and with the
participation of Uniteds management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief
Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Uniteds disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, Uniteds management, including the CEO and CFO,
concluded that Uniteds disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009 were effective in
ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period required by the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms. There have been no changes in Uniteds internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, or in other factors
that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Uniteds internal
control over financial reporting.
57
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the normal course of business, United and its subsidiaries are currently involved in various
legal proceedings. Management is vigorously pursuing all its legal and factual defenses and, after
consultation with legal counsel, believes that all such litigation will be resolved with no
material effect on Uniteds financial position.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, please refer to Uniteds Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for disclosures with respect to Uniteds
risk factors which could materially affect Uniteds business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing
United. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to United or that United currently
deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect Uniteds business, financial condition
and/or operating results. There are no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in
Uniteds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended, December 31, 2008.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There have been no United equity securities sales during the second quarter of 2009 that were not
registered. The table below includes certain information regarding Uniteds purchase of its common
shares during the quarter ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
Purchased |
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced |
|
Yet be Purchased |
Period |
|
(1) (2) |
|
per Share |
|
Plans (3) |
|
Under the Plans (3) |
|
4/01 4/30/2009 |
|
|
9,809 |
|
|
$ |
16.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,200 |
|
5/01 5/31/2009 |
|
|
13,576 |
|
|
$ |
19.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,200 |
|
6/01 6/30/2009 |
|
|
561 |
|
|
$ |
27.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
23,946 |
|
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares exchanged in connection with the exercise of stock options
under Uniteds stock option plans. Shares are purchased pursuant to the terms
of the applicable stock option plan and not pursuant to a publicly announced
stock repurchase plan. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, no shares were
exchanged by participants in Uniteds stock option plans. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares purchased in open market transactions by United for a rabbi
trust to provide payment of benefits under a deferred compensation plan for
certain key officers of United and its subsidiaries. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009, the following shares were purchased for the deferred compensation
plan: April 2009 9,809 shares at an average price of $16.06; May 2009
13,576 shares at an average price of $19.56; and June 2009 561 shares at an
average price of $27.00. |
58
|
|
|
(3) |
|
In May of 2006, Uniteds Board of Directors approved a repurchase plan to
repurchase up to 1.7 million shares of Uniteds common stock on the open market
(the 2006 Plan). The timing, price and quantity of purchases under the plan are
at the discretion of management and the plan may be discontinued, suspended or
restarted at any time depending on the facts and circumstances. |
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) |
|
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on Monday, May 18, 2009. |
(b) |
|
Not applicable as to election of directors because: i) proxies for the meeting were solicited
pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; ii) there was no
solicitation in opposition to the nominees as listed in the proxy statement; iii) all of such
nominees, as listed in the proxy statement, were elected. |
(c) |
|
Two proposals were voted upon at the annual meeting, which included: (1) the election of
fourteen (14) persons to serve as directors of United for a one-year term expiring at the 2010
Annual Meeting; and (2) the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, Charleston,
West Virginia, as independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2009. The results of the proposals appear on the following page. |
(d) |
|
None. |
Proposal 1. Election of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
Richard M. Adams |
|
|
34,465,232 |
|
|
|
2,462,919 |
|
Robert G. Astorg |
|
|
34,543,215 |
|
|
|
2,384,936 |
|
W. Gaston Caperton, III |
|
|
28,329,028 |
|
|
|
8,599,123 |
|
Lawrence K. Doll |
|
|
34,305,821 |
|
|
|
2,622,330 |
|
Theodore J. Georgelas |
|
|
26,358,581 |
|
|
|
10,569,570 |
|
F. T. Graff, Jr. |
|
|
33,808,438 |
|
|
|
3,119,713 |
|
John M. McMahon |
|
|
34,416,032 |
|
|
|
2,512,119 |
|
J. Paul McNamara |
|
|
34,350,612 |
|
|
|
2,577,539 |
|
G. Ogden Nutting |
|
|
34,408,308 |
|
|
|
2,520,113 |
|
William C. Pitt, III |
|
|
34,494,894 |
|
|
|
2,433,257 |
|
Donald L. Unger |
|
|
34,338,295 |
|
|
|
2,589,856 |
|
Mary K. Weddle |
|
|
35,743,358 |
|
|
|
1,184,739 |
|
Gary G. White |
|
|
35,785,427 |
|
|
|
1,142,724 |
|
P. Clinton Winter, Jr. |
|
|
34,539,700 |
|
|
|
2,388,451 |
|
Proposal 2. Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered
public accountants:
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
36,283,856
|
|
1,569,206
|
|
75,087 |
59
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
|
(a) |
|
None. |
|
|
(b) |
|
No changes were made to the procedures by which security holders may recommend
nominees to Uniteds Board of Directors. |
Item 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
|
|
Exhibit 3.2
|
|
Bylaws |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer |
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED BANKSHARES, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
/s/ Richard M. Adams
|
|
|
Richard M. Adams, Chairman of |
|
|
the Board and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
/s/ Steven E. Wilson
|
|
|
Steven E. Wilson, Executive |
|
|
Vice President, Treasurer,
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer |
|
61
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Articles of Incorporation |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Bylaws |
|
|
(b |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
66 |
|
Footnotes:
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Incorporated by reference to a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 23, 2008 and filed
December 31, 2008 for United Bankshares, Inc., File No. 0-13322. |
|
(b) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the 1990 Form 10-K of United Bankshares, Inc., File
No. 0-13322. |
62