e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
August 27,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from
to
Commission File Number
1-13873
STEELCASE INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-0819050
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer identification
no.)
|
901 44th Street SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
49508
(Zip
Code)
|
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
(616) 247-2710
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
Company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 1, 2010, Steelcase Inc. had
85,906,086 shares of Class A Common Stock and
47,088,377 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.
STEELCASE INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 27, 2010
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
578.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,123.8
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
417.5
|
|
|
|
|
403.1
|
|
|
|
|
796.3
|
|
|
|
|
790.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
170.6
|
|
|
|
|
165.0
|
|
|
|
|
332.1
|
|
|
|
|
320.5
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
162.8
|
|
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
|
324.7
|
|
|
|
|
319.6
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid per common share
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $24.0 and $20.6
|
|
|
|
264.8
|
|
|
|
|
242.5
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
652.8
|
|
|
|
|
635.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1,299.7 and $1,309.9
|
|
|
|
393.8
|
|
|
|
|
415.7
|
|
Company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
217.2
|
|
|
|
|
209.6
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
128.6
|
|
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
176.9
|
|
|
|
|
183.8
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
$
|
171.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
159.2
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
256.2
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
154.6
|
|
|
|
|
146.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
686.4
|
|
|
|
|
412.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
|
293.4
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
187.3
|
|
|
|
|
189.5
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
300.7
|
|
|
|
|
567.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
987.1
|
|
|
|
|
979.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
631.2
|
|
|
|
|
650.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
680.1
|
|
|
|
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
Changes in accounts receivable, inventories and accounts
payable, net of deconsolidation
|
|
|
|
(41.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(30.2
|
)
|
Changes in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Changes in employee compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(56.0
|
)
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of
deconsolidation
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
(45.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
(70.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
Net increase in notes receivable
|
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
Liquidations of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(42.9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
STEELCASE INC.
(Unaudited)
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions in Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals and adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements
have been included. Results for interim periods should not be
considered indicative of results to be expected for a full year.
Reference should be made to the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended February 26, 2010
(Form 10-K).
The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 26,
2010 was derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet
included in our
Form 10-K.
As used in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
(Report), unless otherwise expressly stated or the
context otherwise requires, all references to
Steelcase, we, our,
Company and similar references are to Steelcase Inc.
and its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is
maintained. Unless the context otherwise indicates, reference to
a year relates to the fiscal year, ended in February of the year
indicated, rather than a calendar year. Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3
and Q4 reference the first, second, third and fourth quarter,
respectively, of the fiscal year indicated. All amounts are in
millions, except share and per share data, data presented as a
percentage or as otherwise indicated.
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements
have been reclassified and corrected to conform to the current
year presentation. The long-term portions of the product
warranties accrued liability and self-insurance liabilities for
workers compensation of $7.1 and $14.0, respectively as of
February 26, 2010, previously classified as current
liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, have
been reclassified to long-term liabilities. The non-current
portions of deferred income taxes related to these liabilities
of $8.1 have also been reclassified from current to non-current
deferred income taxes in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. The corrections of these amounts were not material and
had no impact on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for any of the periods presented.
|
|
2.
|
PRODUCT
WARRANTIES AND SELF-INSURANCE
|
We offer a
5-year,
10-year or
lifetime warranty for most products, subject to certain
exceptions. These warranties provide for the free repair or
replacement of any covered product, part or component that fails
during normal use because of a defect in materials or
workmanship. The accrued liability for product warranties is
based on an estimated amount needed to cover future product
warranty costs, including product recall and retrofit costs
incurred as of the balance sheet date determined by historical
claims experience and our knowledge of current events and
actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
Roll-Forward of Accrued Liability for Product Warranties
|
|
|
Warranties
|
|
Balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
Accruals related to product warranties, recalls and retrofits
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Adjustments related to changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Reductions for settlements
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of August 27, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
In Q2 2011, we increased the estimate of our general reserve for
warranty claims by $6.0. The increase in our general warranty
reserve was linked to implementation of new software supporting
our claims management processes, which allowed us to more deeply
understand our historical experience as a foundation for
estimating future claims. In addition, during Q2 2011, we
recorded a specific product warranty charge of $4.7 for
estimated expenses related to a pending retrofit project. Our
reserve for estimated settlements expected to be paid within one
year as of August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010 was
$17.1 and $15.0, respectively, and is included in Accrued
expenses: Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets, while our reserve for estimated settlements expected to
be paid beyond one year is included in Other long-term
liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We are self-insured for certain losses relating to domestic
workers compensation and product liability claims. We
purchase insurance coverage to reduce our exposure to
significant levels of these claims. Self-insured losses are
accrued based upon estimates of the aggregate liability for
uninsured claims incurred as of the balance sheet date using
current and historical claims experience and certain actuarial
assumptions. These estimates are subject to uncertainty due to a
variety of factors, including extended lag times in the
reporting and resolution of claims, and trends or changes in
claim settlement patterns, insurance industry practices, and
legal interpretations. As a result, actual costs could differ
significantly from the estimated amounts. Adjustments to
estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the
change in estimate occurs.
Our total reserve for estimated domestic workers
compensation claim costs incurred as of August 27, 2010 and
February 26, 2010 was $16.3 and $20.0, respectively. Our
reserve for estimated domestic workers compensation claims
expected to be paid within one year as of August 27, 2010
and February 26, 2010 was $6.0 and $6.0, respectively, and
is included in Accrued expenses: Other on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets, while our reserve for estimated
domestic workers compensation claims expected to be paid
beyond one year is included in Other long-term
liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During Q2 2011, we recognized a change in estimate, decreasing
the reserve for estimated workers compensation claim costs
by $3.7. The change in estimate was mainly due to the
continuation of favorable trends in past experience.
Our reserve for estimated product liability costs incurred as of
August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010 was $4.8 and
$7.1, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses:
Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. During
Q2 2011, we recognized a change in estimate, decreasing the
reserve for estimated product liability costs by $3.0. The
change in estimate was due to the continuation of favorable
trends in past experience.
|
|
3.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
|
In Q4 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued updated guidance to add new
requirements regarding fair value disclosures about transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to
Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs
and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. We adopted
the new guidance in Q1 2011. See Note 6 for additional
information.
|
|
|
Variable
Interest Entities
|
In Q2 2010, the FASB issued a new accounting statement which
changed the consolidation model for variable interest entities.
This statement requires companies to qualitatively assess the
determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity (VIE) based on whether the beneficiary
(1) has the
5
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
power to direct matters that most significantly impact the
activities of the VIE and (2) has the obligation to absorb
losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. We adopted the new
guidance in Q1 2011.
Based on this statement, we deconsolidated a variable interest
dealer in Q1 2011 which had no effect on net income. In
addition, we deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in Q3
2010. For the year ended February 26, 2010 and the interim
periods therein, our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations included the following related to the consolidation
of these dealers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer Deconsolidations
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q2 2011, the FASB issued new guidance expanding disclosures
about the credit quality of financing receivables and the
allowance for credit losses. The guidance requires enhanced
disclosures regarding the nature of credit risk inherent in an
entitys portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk
is analyzed, and the changes and reasons for those changes in
the allowance for credit losses. The new disclosures will
require information for both the financing receivables and the
related allowance for credit losses at more disaggregated
levels. Financing receivables include loans and notes
receivable, long-term trade accounts receivable, and certain
other contractual rights to receive money on demand or on fixed
or determinable dates. Trade accounts receivable with
contractual maturities of one year or less that arose from the
sales of goods or services are excluded from the new guidance.
The disclosure requirements will be effective in Q4 2011.
6
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Earnings per share is computed using the two-class method. The
two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of
common stock and participating securities according to dividends
or dividend equivalents and their respective participation
rights in undistributed earnings. Basic earnings per share is
based on the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during each period, excluding participating
securities. Earnings per share of participating securities,
which include performance units in which the participants have
non-forfeitable rights to dividends during the performance
period, is the same as basic earnings per share for all periods
presented. Diluted earnings per share includes the effects of
options and certain performance shares and performance units in
which the participants have forfeitable rights to dividends
during the performance period. However, for the three months and
six months ended August 27, 2010 and August 28, 2009,
diluted earnings per share does not reflect the effects of
options, performance shares and certain performance units
totaling 3.3 million and 3.8 million, respectively,
because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Computation of Earnings per Share
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding for basic earnings
per share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
133.1
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock-based compensation (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding for diluted
earnings per share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
133.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shares outstanding at period end (in millions)
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and all changes
to shareholders equity except those due to investments by,
and distributions to, shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments reflect the impact of
the changes in certain foreign currency values (principally the
euro, pound sterling and Canadian dollar) relative to the
U.S. dollar. As of August 27, 2010, approximately 28%
of our assets were denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, the majority of which were denominated in
euros.
The carrying amounts for many of our financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes
receivable, accounts and notes payable, short-term borrowings
and certain other liabilities, approximate their fair value due
to their relatively short maturities. Our short-term
investments, foreign exchange forward contracts and long-term
investments are measured at fair value on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. We carry our long-term debt at
cost. The fair value of our
8
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
long-term debt is measured using a discounted cash flow analysis
based on current market interest rates for similar types of
instruments and was approximately $307 and $309 as of
August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010, respectively.
We periodically use derivative financial instruments to manage
exposures to movements in interest rates and foreign exchange
rates. The use of these financial instruments modifies the
exposure of these risks with the intention to reduce our risk of
short-term volatility. We do not use derivatives for speculative
or trading purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
U.S. agency debt securities
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
Other long-term investments
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
175.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
U.S. agency debt securities
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Other long-term investments
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
203.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy for any period presented. Below is a
roll-forward of assets and liabilities measured at fair value
using Level 3 inputs for the six months ended
August 27, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
Roll-Forward of Fair Value Using Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of August 27, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
other-than-temporary
impairments recognized on our auction rate securities during the
three and six months ended August 27, 2010 were not
material and were recognized in Other income (expense), net
on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
|
73.7
|
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
119.7
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portion of inventories determined by the LIFO method
aggregated $45.3 as of August 27, 2010 and $39.0 as of
February 26, 2010.
|
|
8.
|
COMPANY-OWNED
LIFE INSURANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Surrender Value
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Choose
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Asset Allocation
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Net Return
|
|
|
as of August 27, 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Whole life insurance policies
|
|
|
No ability
|
|
|
A rate of return
set periodically by
the insurance companies
|
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
|
$
|
111.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable life insurance policies
|
|
|
Can allocate across a set of choices provided by the insurance
companies
|
|
|
Fluctuates depending on performance of underlying investments
|
|
|
75% Fixed
Income; 25%
Equity
|
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
|
100.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
217.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
209.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Our investments in company-owned life insurance
(COLI) policies are recorded at their net cash
surrender value. Our investments in COLI policies, while an
available source of liquidity, were made with the intention of
utilizing them as a long-term funding source for post-retirement
medical benefits, deferred compensation and supplemental
retirement plan obligations. The net cash surrender value of our
COLI investments exceeds these employee benefit obligations on a
tax-adjusted basis and therefore, to more efficiently manage our
balance sheet and liquidity position, in Q1 2011 we began
considering our investments in variable life COLI policies to be
primarily a source of corporate liquidity. As a result of this
change, we adjusted the target asset allocation of the
investments in variable life COLI policies to more heavily
weight the portfolio to fixed income securities; and beginning
in Q1 2011, net returns in cash surrender value, normal
insurance expenses and any death benefit gains (COLI
income) related to our investments in variable life COLI
policies have been recorded in Other income (expense), net
on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
consistent with our other investments.
We continue our intention to utilize our investments in whole
life COLI policies as a funding source for post-retirement
medical benefits and other employee obligations. We believe the
investments in whole life COLI policies represent a stable
source for these long-term benefit obligations. Consequently, we
continue to allocate COLI income related to our investments in
whole life COLI policies between Cost of sales and
Operating expenses on the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations consistent with the costs associated
with the long-term employee benefit obligations that the
investments in whole life policies are intended to fund.
These designations do not result in our investments in COLI
policies representing a committed funding source for liquidity
or employee benefit obligations. They are subject to claims from
creditors, and we can designate them to another purpose at any
time.
Following is a summary of the allocation of COLI income for the
three months and six months ended August 27, 2010 and
August 28, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Whole Life
|
|
|
|
Variable Life
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Whole Life
|
|
|
|
Variable Life
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
COLI Income
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Whole Life
|
|
|
|
Variable Life
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Whole Life
|
|
|
|
Variable Life
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
COLI Income
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The provision for income taxes for the six months ended
August 27, 2010 includes a discrete item of $11.4 to
recognize a reduction in deferred tax assets. In Q1 2011, the
U.S. enacted significant healthcare reform legislation
which changed the tax treatment of the federal subsidies
received by employers who provide certain prescription drug
benefits for retirees (the Medicare Part D
subsidy) for fiscal years beginning after
December 31, 2012. We are required to recognize the impact
of the tax law change in the period in which the law is enacted.
We had previously recorded deferred tax assets based on the
liability for post-retirement benefit obligations related to
prescription drug benefits for retirees. As a result of the law
change during Q1 2011, deferred tax assets were reduced as these
obligations will no longer be deductible for purposes of
determining taxable income to the extent they are reimbursed by
the Medicare Part D subsidy. In addition, in Q2 2011 we
recorded $1.1 of other miscellaneous discrete items. Excluding
discrete items, income tax expense recorded for the three and
six months ended August 27, 2010 reflects an estimated
annual effective tax rate of approximately 37%.
In Q1 2011, we awarded a target of 779,000 performance units
under the Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan to our
executive officers. The performance units are earned after a
three-year performance period, from 2011 through 2013, based on
our total shareholder return relative to a comparison group of
companies. The number of shares that may be earned can range
from 25% to 200% of the target amount. A number of units equal
to 25% of the target level of each award will be earned if the
participant remains employed through the end of 2013 or retires,
becomes disabled, dies or is terminated without cause, or a
change in control occurs during the performance period, whether
or not the minimum performance level is achieved. The minimum
award will be forfeited if a participant leaves our company for
reasons other than retirement, disability, death or termination
without cause prior to the end of the performance period. The
remainder of the award will be forfeited if a participant leaves
our company for reasons other than retirement, disability or
death. During the performance period, participants receive a
cash dividend equivalent based on the underlying target award
equal to the dividends we declare and pay on our Class A
Common Stock. The fair value of the performance units awarded
during Q1 2011 was calculated on the grant date using the Monte
Carlo simulation model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Awards
|
|
Three-year risk-free interest rate (1)
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Expected term
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Estimated volatility (2)
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
|
$
|
9.14
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the U.S. government bond benchmark on the grant date. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the historical price volatility of our common stock
for the three-year period preceding the grant date. |
The total performance shares and performance units expense and
associated tax benefit related to all outstanding awards for the
three months and six months ended August 27, 2010 and
August 28, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Performance Shares and Performance Units
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Performance shares and performance units expense
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
12
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
The performance shares and performance units activity for the
six months ended August 27, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Maximum Number of Nonvested Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value per Share (2)
|
|
Nonvested as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
1,766,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.54
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
1,558,000
|
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested as of August 27, 2010 (1)
|
|
|
|
3,324,000
|
|
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total nonvested shares include 390,500 shares which
represent the 25% portion of the awards granted in 2010 and 2011
which are not subject to performance conditions. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value per share presented in this table has been
adjusted to align with the presentation of the awards at the
maximum number of shares that could be awarded. |
As of August 27, 2010, there was $5.3 of remaining
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance
shares and performance units. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of
2.2 years.
We operate within North America and International reportable
segments plus an Other category. The Other category
includes the Coalesse Group, PolyVision and IDEO. Unallocated
corporate expenses are reported as Corporate.
Revenue and operating income (loss) for the three months and six
months ended August 27, 2010 and August 28, 2009 and
total assets as of August 27, 2010 and February 26,
2010 by segment are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Reportable Segment Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
322.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
323.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
615.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
616.9
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
155.8
|
|
|
|
|
147.1
|
|
|
|
|
297.4
|
|
|
|
|
299.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
121.7
|
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
|
229.2
|
|
|
|
|
207.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
578.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,123.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Reportable Segment Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
655.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
695.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
399.0
|
|
|
|
|
382.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
|
|
|
231.6
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
393.2
|
|
|
|
|
368.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,667.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
RESTRUCTURING
ACTIVITIES
|
In Q1 2011, we announced a project to reorganize our European
manufacturing operations on the basis of specialized
competencies. The primary drivers of the changes included our
continued improvements in manufacturing practices, combined with
the need for manufacturing footprint optimization and further
cost reductions. We expect to incur approximately $15 of cash
restructuring costs in connection with this project, with the
majority relating to workforce reductions and some additional
costs for manufacturing consolidation and production moves. For
the three and six months ended August 27, 2010, we incurred
$9.4 of restructuring costs related to this project mainly due
to workforce reductions.
The remaining restructuring costs for the three months and six
months ended August 27, 2010 primarily related to several
smaller actions initiated in the last six to nine months to
consolidate manufacturing facilities and reorganize other areas
of our business.
Restructuring costs are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Restructuring Costs
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Below is a summary of the net additions, payments and
adjustments to the restructuring reserve balance for the six
months ended August 27, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Exits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
|
and Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Reserve
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Reserve balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.5
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of August 27, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The workforce reductions reserve balance as of August 27,
2010 primarily related to estimated employee termination costs
associated with the reorganization of our European manufacturing
operations.
15
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations:
|
This managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended February 26, 2010. Reference to a
year relates to the fiscal year, ended in February of the year
indicated, rather than the calendar year, unless indicated by a
specific date. Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 reference the
first, second, third and fourth quarter, respectively, of the
fiscal year indicated.
Year-to-date
references the six months ended for the fiscal year indicated.
All amounts are in millions, except share and per share data,
data presented as a percentage or as otherwise indicated.
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the current years
presentation.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
This item contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. A
non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical
measure of a companys financial performance that excludes
or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP in the consolidated statements of operations, balance
sheets or statements of cash flows of the company. Pursuant to
the requirements of Regulation G, we have provided a
reconciliation below of non-GAAP financial measures to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
The non-GAAP financial measures used are: (1) organic
revenue growth, which represents the change in revenue over the
prior year excluding estimated currency translation effects and
the impact from dealer deconsolidations, and (2) adjusted
operating income (loss), which represents operating income
(loss) excluding restructuring costs and the net returns in cash
surrender value, normal insurance expenses and any death benefit
gains related to our investments in variable life company-owned
life insurance policies (variable life COLI income).
These measures are presented because management uses this
information to monitor and evaluate financial results and
trends. Therefore, management believes this information is also
useful for investors.
16
Financial
Summary
Results of
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
578.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,123.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
417.5
|
|
|
|
69.6
|
|
|
|
|
403.1
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
|
796.3
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
|
790.2
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
170.6
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
165.0
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
|
332.1
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
320.5
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
162.8
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
158.6
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
324.7
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
|
319.6
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Interest expense and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 Organic Revenue Growth
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Q2 2010 revenue
|
|
|
$
|
323.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
147.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
578.1
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations
|
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
Currency translation effects*
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2010 revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
311.1
|
|
|
|
|
135.1
|
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
|
554.2
|
|
Q2 2011 revenue
|
|
|
|
322.3
|
|
|
|
|
155.8
|
|
|
|
|
121.7
|
|
|
|
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date 2011 Organic Revenue Growth
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Year-to-date
2010 revenue
|
|
|
$
|
616.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
299.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
207.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,123.8
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations
|
|
|
|
(27.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects**
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-date
2010 revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
596.9
|
|
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
|
|
207.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,091.8
|
|
Year-to-date
2011 revenue
|
|
|
|
615.0
|
|
|
|
|
297.4
|
|
|
|
|
229.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Currency translation effects represent the estimated net effect
of translating Q2 2010 foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rates during Q2 2011. |
|
** |
|
Currency translation effects represent the estimated net effect
of translating Q2 2010 and Q1 2010 foreign currency revenues
using the average exchange rates during Q2 2011 and Q1 2011,
respectively. |
Overview
We recorded Q2 2011 net income of $2.8 compared to net
income of $0 in Q2 2010. The increase in net income was driven
by organic revenue growth across all our reporting segments and
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts, offset in part by lower COLI income, higher
compensation costs and a product specific warranty charge.
Revenue for Q2 2011 was $599.8 compared to $578.1 in Q2 2010,
representing organic revenue growth of 8% after adjusting for
dealer deconsolidations and currency translation effects. During
Q2 2011, we experienced strong order growth driven primarily by
increased project activity in North America and
International, resulting in a higher backlog at the end of the
quarter compared to the beginning of the quarter. We believe
that we are seeing evidence that our industry is emerging from
the effects of the global economic recession.
Operating income grew to $6.5 in Q2 2011, compared to an
operating loss of $1.0 in the prior year. Q2 2011 adjusted
operating income of $19.5 represented an improvement of $12.9
compared to the prior year primarily due to operating leverage
from organic revenue growth. Benefits from restructuring
activities and other cost reduction efforts were essentially
offset by the product specific warranty charge of $5 related to
a pending retrofit project. The
year-over-year
comparison was also negatively impacted by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $3 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries to 2009 levels,
|
|
|
|
variable compensation expense of $3 related to our Economic
Value Added (EVA)-based incentive compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
modestly higher commodity costs and
|
|
|
|
a Q2 2010 gain of $3 recorded in connection with a settlement of
a domestic property tax dispute.
|
Q2 2011 organic revenue growth compared to the prior year was
broad based and totaled $46 or 8%. We realized organic revenue
growth of 4% in North America, 15% in the International segment
and 13% in the Other category.
Cost of sales decreased to 69.6% of revenue in Q2 2011, a
20 basis point improvement compared to Q2 2010. The
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts and higher absorption of fixed costs associated with the
organic revenue growth in the quarter were largely offset by a
100 basis point reduction related to lower variable life
COLI income and an 80 basis point reduction associated with
the product specific warranty charge.
18
Operating expenses increased by $4.2 in Q2 2011 compared to the
same period last year. The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
$2 of higher compensation costs related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries to 2009 levels,
|
|
|
|
$2 of higher variable compensation expense related to our
EVA-based incentive compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
variable life COLI income in the prior year of $4.1 and
|
|
|
|
a Q2 2010 gain of $2 recorded in connection with a settlement of
a domestic property tax dispute.
|
These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $5.4
from dealer deconsolidations within the last twelve months,
favorable currency translation effects of approximately $3 and
benefits of restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts.
We recorded a
year-to-date
2011 net loss of $8.3 compared to
year-to-date
2010 net income of $0.
Year-to-date
2011 results were affected by the same factors as our Q2 2011
results as well as the negative impact of a Q1 2011 income tax
charge of $11.4 resulting from the recently enacted
U.S. healthcare reform legislation.
The $33.6 improvement in
year-to-date
2011 adjusted operating income was driven by similar items
affecting Q2 2011. All segments reported
year-to-date
2011 organic revenue growth.
Year-to-date
2011 cost of sales also benefited from a modest decrease in
commodity costs in Q1 2011.
Year-to-date
2011 operating expenses also increased due to variable life COLI
income in Q1 2010 of $7.2 and $2 of higher compensation costs in
Q1 2011 related to the reinstatement of employee salaries to
2009 levels offset by a reduction in Q1 2011 of $5.3 from dealer
deconsolidations.
We recorded restructuring costs of $13.0 in Q2 2011 and
$15.5 year-to-date
2011 compared to $17.4 in Q2 2010 and
$20.2 year-to-date
2010. In Q2 2011, we recorded $9.4 related to the project to
reorganize our European manufacturing operations. The remaining
restructuring costs for Q2 2011 and
year-to-date
2011 primarily related to several smaller actions initiated in
the last six to nine months to consolidate manufacturing
facilities and reorganize other areas of our business.
Q2 2011 income tax expense included charges of $1.1 for
miscellaneous discrete tax items. The
year-to-date
2011 provision for income taxes also included a Q1 2011 discrete
item of $11.4 to recognize a reduction in deferred tax assets
resulting from the recently enacted U.S. healthcare reform
legislation. Excluding discrete items, income tax expense
recorded for Q2 2011 and
year-to-date
2011 reflects an estimated annual effective tax rate of 37%.
Interest Expense
and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Interest Expense and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable life COLI income
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated ventures
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Miscellaneous, net
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning in Q1 2011, Other income (expense), net
includes gains and losses from variable life COLI policies.
See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
19
The Q2 and
year-to-date
2011 increase in Other income (expense), net is primarily
due to variable life COLI income. In addition, within
Miscellaneous, net, Q2 2011 included a $2.2 recovery of a
reserve recorded in conjunction with the liquidation of an
unconsolidated joint venture.
Business Segment
Review
See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding our business
segments.
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Data North America
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
322.3
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
323.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
615.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
616.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
230.5
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
|
438.6
|
|
|
|
71.3
|
|
|
|
|
430.6
|
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
|
98.5
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
|
173.1
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
|
182.3
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
|
149.7
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
|
139.5
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss) North America
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income in the North America segment decreased by $14.9
in Q2 2011 compared to the same period last year, which included
$9.7 of variable life COLI income. Adjusted operating income
declined by $7.9 in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010, primarily
driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
a product specific warranty charge of $4 related to a pending
retrofit project,
|
|
|
|
higher variable compensation expense of $3 related to our
EVA-based incentive compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $2 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries to 2009 levels,
|
|
|
|
modestly higher commodity costs and
|
|
|
|
a Q2 2010 gain of $3 recorded in connection with a settlement of
a domestic property tax dispute.
|
The decline was partially offset by operating leverage from
organic revenue growth and benefits from restructuring
activities and other cost reduction efforts. The $6.7
improvement in
year-to-date
2011 adjusted operating income was impacted by similar items,
but also benefited from a modest decrease in commodity costs in
Q1 2011 compared to the same period last year.
North America revenue represented 53.7% of consolidated revenue
in Q2 2011. Revenue for Q2 2011 was $322.3 compared to
$323.0 in Q2 2010, representing organic revenue growth of 4%
after adjusting for dealer deconsolidations and currency
translation effects.
Year-to-date
2011 organic revenue growth was $18 or 3%. Revenue growth is
categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Vertical markets Revenue growth in Q2 2011
reflected strength in Technical/Professional, Bioscience, and
Financial Services. Most other vertical markets reported revenue
growth in Q2 2011 including single digit growth in
Education; however, Insurance Services, Information Technology
and Healthcare reported Q2 2011 revenue declines compared to the
same period last
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
year. In addition, we generated single digit revenue growth in
Federal Government during Q2 2011, but generated double
digit growth
year-to-date
2011 compared to the same period last year. State and Local
Governments revenue was down slightly in Q2 2011 compared to the
same period last year and down significantly on a
year-to-date
2011 basis compared to the same period in 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product categories Seating led revenue growth
in Q2 2011 and
year-to-date
2011 along with modest growth in most other categories compared
to the same periods last year.
|
|
|
|
Contract type Continuing business
(day-to-day
sales to larger customers) and marketing program business
(mostly sales to smaller customers) both reported Q2 2011
revenue growth compared to the prior year, while project
business declined slightly from prior year. All contract types
grew over prior year on a
year-to-date
basis in 2011, with the strongest growth coming from marketing
program business.
|
Cost of sales increased to 71.5% of revenue in Q2 2011, a
240 basis point deterioration compared to Q2 2010.
Excluding the 180 basis point impact of variable life COLI
income, cost of sales increased by 60 basis points, which
was largely driven by the product specific warranty charge of
120 basis points and modestly higher commodity costs,
partially offset by benefits from restructuring activities and
other cost reduction efforts and higher absorption of fixed
costs associated with revenue growth. Excluding the
260 basis point impact of variable life COLI income,
year-to-date
2011 cost of sales improved by 110 basis points and was affected
by the same factors as Q2 2011 results, except that year-to-date
2011 cost of sales also benefited from a modest decrease of
commodity costs in Q1 2011 compared to the same period last year.
Operating expenses increased by $9.5 in Q2 2011 compared to the
same period last year. The increase was driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
$2 of higher variable compensation expense related to our
EVA-based incentive compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
$2 of higher compensation costs related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries to 2009 levels,
|
|
|
|
variable life COLI income in the prior year of $4.0 and
|
|
|
|
a Q2 2010 gain of $2 recorded in connection with a settlement of
a domestic property tax dispute.
|
These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $5.4
from dealer deconsolidations within the last twelve months, as
well as benefits of restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts.
Year-to-date
2011 operating expenses also increased due to variable life COLI
income in Q1 2010 of $7.1 and $2 of higher compensation costs in
Q1 2011 related to the reinstatement of employee salaries to
2009 levels, offset by a reduction in Q1 2011 of $5.3 from
dealer deconsolidations.
Restructuring costs of $2.5 incurred in Q2 2011 and
$3.9 year-to-date
2011 primarily related to the consolidation of manufacturing
facilities.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Data International
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
155.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
147.1
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
297.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
299.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
111.2
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
|
106.0
|
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
|
|
214.0
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
|
|
|
214.1
|
|
|
|
71.6
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
|
73.7
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
78.1
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
|
101.2
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(25.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) to Adjusted Operating
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Income (Loss) International
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(25.4
|
)
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(16.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The operating loss in the International segment decreased by
$8.3 in Q2 2011. Q2 2011 adjusted operating loss improved $9.3
and approximated break-even. The improvement was primarily
driven by operating leverage from organic revenue growth and
benefits from prior restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts. The
year-to-date
2011 operating loss was negatively impacted by an organic
revenue decline in Q1 2011.
International revenue represented 26.0% of consolidated revenue
in Q2 2011. Revenue for Q2 2011 was $155.8 compared to $147.1 in
Q2 2010, representing organic revenue growth of 15% after
adjusting for currency translation effects.
Year-to-date
2011 organic revenue growth was $10 or 4%. During Q2 2011,
substantially all regions reported organic revenue growth, with
double digit growth reported by Latin America, Spain, Asia and
the Middle East compared to the same period last year. All
regions except Germany and parts of Northern Europe experienced
organic revenue growth
year-to-date
2011.
Cost of sales decreased to 71.4% of revenue in Q2 2011, a
70 basis point improvement compared to Q2 2010. The
improvement was mainly due to the benefits from prior
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts and
higher absorption of fixed costs associated with the revenue
growth in the quarter.
Year-to-date
2011 cost of sales was also negatively impacted by disruption
related costs associated with recently initiated restructuring
activities.
Q2 2011 operating expenses decreased by $5.8 and
year-to-date
2011 operating expenses decreased by $7.5 primarily due to
benefits from prior restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts. Q2 and
year-to-date
2011 operating expenses were also favorably impacted by
approximately $3 due to currency translation effects.
Restructuring costs of $9.9 incurred in Q2 2011 and
$10.3 year-to-date
2011 primarily related to the project to reorganize our European
manufacturing operations. We expect to incur a total of
approximately $15 of cash restructuring costs in connection with
this project, with the majority relating to workforce reductions
and some additional costs for manufacturing consolidation and
production moves. We anticipate annualized savings from these
actions to be approximately $7 when fully implemented by the end
of 2011.
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data Other
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
121.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
229.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
207.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
75.8
|
|
|
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
|
68.5
|
|
|
|
|
143.7
|
|
|
|
62.7
|
|
|
|
|
145.5
|
|
|
|
70.1
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
68.5
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) to Adjusted
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) Other
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Other category includes the Coalesse Group, PolyVision and
IDEO. The Other category reported operating income of $11.5 in
Q2 2011 compared to an operating loss of $4.0 in Q2 2010, and
operating income of
$15.7 year-to-date
in 2011 compared to an operating loss of $10.9 in the same
period in 2010. The improvements were primarily due to revenue
growth across the entire category and significant operational
improvements at PolyVision and the Coalesse Group.
Q2 2011 revenue increased by $13.7 or 12.7% and
year-to-date
2011 revenue increased $21.5 or 10.4%. IDEO experienced a
significant increase in revenue as a result of a number of large
consulting projects. The Coalesse Group reported 13% revenue
growth in Q2 2011 due to an increase in
day-to-day
business. PolyVision reported moderate revenue growth in Q2
2011; however, excluding the impact of businesses exited in
2010, PolyVision revenue increased by over 25%. We experienced
seasonal growth in PolyVision due in part to the school
construction cycle where activity is strongest during the summer
months; however, growth was also attributable to having exited
the lower margin static whiteboard business and refocusing on
the classroom with new technology like ēno.
Cost of sales as a percent of revenue decreased by
620 basis points in Q2 2011 compared to Q2 2010 and
740 basis points
year-to-date
in 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
operational improvements at Coalesse,
|
|
|
|
improvements at PolyVision as a result of growth in higher
margin Technology and Surfaces product categories and benefits
from the 2010 exit of lower margin businesses in the U.S.,
|
|
|
|
higher consultant utilization rates at IDEO,
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts and
|
|
|
|
higher fixed cost absorption related to revenue growth.
|
Q2 2011 operating expenses decreased by $0.9 and
year-to-date
2011 operating expenses decreased by $0.5 due to benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts.
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data Corporate
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Adjusted
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) Corporate
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.9
|
)
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 80% of corporate expenses are charged to the
operating segments as part of a corporate allocation.
Unallocated portions of these expenses are considered general
corporate costs
23
and are reported as Corporate. Corporate costs include
unallocated portions of executive costs and shared service
functions such as information technology, human resources,
finance, legal, research and development and corporate
facilities.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Based on current business conditions, we target a minimum of
$100 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments to
fund
day-to-day
operations, to provide available liquidity for investments in
growth initiatives and as a cushion against economic volatility.
Our actual cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as we plan for
and manage certain seasonal disbursements, particularly the
annual payment of accrued variable compensation and retirement
plan contributions in Q1 of each fiscal year, when applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Primary Liquidity Sources
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Variable life COLI
|
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability under credit facilities
|
|
|
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
|
$
|
380.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of August 27, 2010, we held a total of $147.7 in cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Of our total
cash and cash equivalents, approximately 50% was located in the
U.S. and the remaining 50% was located outside of the U.S.,
primarily in Canada and France. The majority of our short-term
investments were located in the U.S. and maintained in a
managed investment portfolio which primarily consists of
U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government agency and corporate
debt instruments.
In Q1 2011, we began considering our investments in variable
life COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate
liquidity. Accordingly, during Q1 2011, we set the allocation of
our investments in variable life COLI policies to a more
conservative profile with a heavier weighting to fixed income
securities. In addition, our investments in whole life COLI
policies represent a potential source of liquidity. The whole
life and variable life policies are recorded at their net cash
surrender values. We believe the financial strength of the
issuing insurance companies associated with our variable and
whole life COLI policies are sufficient to meet their
obligations to us. See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for more information.
Availability under credit facilities may be reduced by the use
of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments for
purposes other than the repayment of debt as a result of
constraints related to our maximum leverage ratio covenant. See
Liquidity Facilities for more information.
The following table summarizes our statements of cash flows for
the six months ended August 27, 2010 and August 28,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(70.3
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(42.9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Cash Flow Data Operating Activities
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
Changes in accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable
|
|
|
|
(41.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of COLI
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(30.2
|
)
|
Changes in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Changes in employee compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(56.0
|
)
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
(45.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(70.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in cash provided by operating activities in 2011
compared to cash used in operating activities in 2010 was
primarily due to a decrease in variable compensation payments
and the receipt of a U.S. income tax refund in Q1 2011,
partially offset by an increase in cash used for working capital
due to the increase in revenue during 2011.
Cash provided by
(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Cash Flow Data Investing Activities
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
$
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(16.6
|
)
|
Net increase in notes receivable
|
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Net liquidations (purchases) of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
$
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in 2011 were primarily related to
investments in product development in North America and
International, and included a progress payment of $2.9 towards a
replacement aircraft. The net increase in notes receivable
includes additional borrowings by dealers under asset-based
lending arrangements put in place in prior years.
Cash provided by
(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 28,
|
|
Cash Flow Data Financing Activities
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47.0
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.1
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
$
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary use of cash in financing activities continues to
relate to dividends paid on our common stock.
We paid dividends of $0.04 per common share during Q1 2011 and
Q2 2011 and $0.08 and $0.04 per common share during Q1 2010 and
Q2 2010, respectively. On September 29, 2010, our Board of
Directors declared a dividend of $0.04 per common share to be
paid in Q3 2011.
25
As of the end of Q2 2011, we had $210.8 of remaining
availability under the $250 share repurchase program
approved by our Board of Directors in Q4 2008. We have no
outstanding share repurchase commitments.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
During 2011, no material change in our off-balance sheet
arrangements occurred.
Contractual
Obligations
During 2011, no material change in our contractual obligations
occurred.
Liquidity
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity Facilities
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
Global committed bank facility
|
|
|
$
|
125.0
|
|
Less: availability limited due to covenant constraints
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability of global committed bank facility
|
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
Various uncommitted lines
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit lines available
|
|
|
|
130.3
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available capacity
|
|
|
$
|
126.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our $125 global committed, syndicated credit facility expires in
Q4 2013. At our option, and subject to certain conditions, we
may increase the aggregate commitment under the facility by up
to $75 by obtaining a commitment from one or more lenders.
Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and unsubordinated.
The facility requires us to satisfy financial covenants
including a maximum leverage ratio covenant and a minimum
interest coverage ratio covenant. As of August 27, 2010,
there were no borrowings outstanding under the facility, and we
were in compliance with all covenants under the facility;
however, our availability was limited to $85 as a result of
constraints related to our maximum leverage ratio covenant.
The various uncommitted lines may be changed or cancelled by the
banks at any time. Outstanding borrowings on uncommitted
facilities of $3.7 as of August 27, 2010 were primarily
related to short-term liquidity management within our
International segment. In addition, we have a revolving letter
of credit agreement for $18.5 of which $18.3 was utilized
primarily related to our self-insured workers compensation
programs as of August 27, 2010. There were no draws on our
standby letters of credit during 2011.
Total consolidated debt as of August 27, 2010 was $298.8.
Our debt primarily consists of $249.9 in term notes due in Q2
2012 with an effective interest rate of 6.3%. The term notes are
classified as short-term in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet as they are due within one year and we do not intend to
use existing financing arrangements to refinance these
short-term obligations on a long-term basis. It is our current
intention to refinance the term notes with other long term
instruments prior to the maturity date. In addition, we have a
$44.3 term loan due in Q2 2017 at a floating interest rate based
on 30-day
LIBOR plus 3.35%. The term notes are unsecured, the term loan is
secured by our two corporate aircraft, and both the term notes
and the term loan contain no financial covenants and are not
cross-defaulted to other debt facilities.
Liquidity
Outlook
Our current cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances, cash generated from future operations, funds available
from COLI and funds available under our credit facilities are
expected to be sufficient to finance our known or foreseeable
liquidity needs. We believe there are indicators that most
geographies and markets around the world are emerging from the
adverse impacts of the global economic recession, although the
timing, strength and continuity of the economic recovery remain
26
uncertain which may continue to challenge our level of cash
generation from operations. We continue to maintain a
conservative approach to liquidity and maintain flexibility over
significant uses of cash including our capital expenditures and
discretionary operating expenses.
We have $249.9 of unsecured senior notes due in Q2 2012
(2012 Notes). It is our current intention to
refinance the 2012 Notes with other long term instruments prior
to the maturity date. Based on the current market environment
and our discussions with financial advisors, we believe we will
be able to issue long term debt with similar terms and
conditions prior to the maturity of the 2012 Notes. In the event
there is a market disruption or we are otherwise unable to issue
new debt with reasonable terms, we expect we will be able to
repay the 2012 Notes and manage our business with funds
available from our cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments, other potential third-party financing sources, our
investments in COLI policies and our global committed bank
facility.
Our other significant funding requirements include operating
expenses, non-cancelable operating lease obligations, capital
expenditures, variable compensation and retirement plan
contributions, dividend payments and debt service obligations.
We expect capital expenditures to total approximately $50 in
2011 compared to $35 in 2010. In addition, we expect capital
expenditures in 2011 to include progress payments associated
with a replacement corporate aircraft totaling $9 and
approximately $3 in spending on corporate facilities as a result
of campus consolidation. We closely manage capital spending to
ensure we are making investments that we believe will sustain
our business and preserve our ability to introduce innovative
new products.
We are in the process of completing various restructuring
actions including a project to consolidate our manufacturing
operations in Europe. We expect to incur a total of
approximately $15 of restructuring costs in connection with this
project; $9.4 of such costs were incurred in Q2 2011, and we
expect to incur the majority of the remaining restructuring
costs in Q3 and Q4 2011.
We announced a quarterly dividend on our common stock of $0.04
per share, or $5.4 to be paid in Q3 2011. Future dividends will
be subject to approval by our Board of Directors.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
During Q2 2011, there have been no changes in the items that we
have identified as critical accounting estimates.
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Forward-looking
Statements
From time to time, in written and oral statements, we discuss
our expectations regarding future events and our plans and
objectives for future operations. These forward-looking
statements generally are accompanied by words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, forecast,
intend, may, possible,
potential, predict, project,
or other similar words, phrases or expressions. Forward-looking
statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to vary from our expectations because
of factors such as, but not limited to, competitive and general
economic conditions domestically and internationally; acts of
terrorism, war, governmental action, natural disasters and other
Force Majeure events; changes in the legal and regulatory
environment; our restructuring activities; currency
fluctuations; changes in customer demand; and the other risks
and contingencies detailed in this Report, our most recent
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We undertake no obligation to update, amend, or
clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:
|
The nature of market risks (i.e., the risk of loss arising from
adverse changes in market rates and prices) faced by us as of
August 27, 2010 is the same as disclosed in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
27
for the year ended February 26, 2010. We are exposed to
market risks from foreign currency exchange, interest rates,
commodity prices and fixed income and equity prices, which could
affect our operating results, financial position and cash flows.
Foreign Exchange
Risk
During Q2 2011, no material change in foreign exchange risk
occurred.
Interest Rate
Risk
During Q2 2011, no material change in interest rate risk
occurred.
Fixed Income and
Equity Price Risk
During Q2 2011, no material change in fixed income and equity
price risk occurred.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures:
|
(a) Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our management, under the supervision
and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
or 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)), as of August 27, 2010. Based on
such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that as of August 27, 2010, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in
(1) recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a
timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and
(2) ensuring that information required to be disclosed by
us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during our second fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:
|
Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
The following is a summary of share repurchase activity during
Q2 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
|
that May Yet be
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
5/29/10 7/2/10
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
210.8
|
|
7/3/10 7/30/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
210.8
|
|
7/31/10 8/27/10
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
210.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1,772
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In December 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program permitting the repurchase of up to $250 of
shares of our common stock. This program has no specific
expiration date. |
|
(2) |
|
All of these shares were repurchased to satisfy
participants tax withholding obligations upon the vesting
of restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants, pursuant
to the terms of our Incentive Compensation Plan. |
See Exhibit Index.
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STEELCASE INC.
Mark T. Mossing
Corporate Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: October 4, 2010
30
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
Description
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated as of February 27, 2010(1)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on June 30, 2010 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
31