e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from _______ to __________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission file number |
001-13790 |
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0336636 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
13403 Northwest Freeway, Houston, Texas
|
|
77040-6094 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
(713) 690-7300 |
|
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock as of
the latest practicable date.
On July 31, 2006, there were approximately 111.3 million shares of common stock, $1.00 par value
issued and outstanding.
1
HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
EXPLANATORY NOTE LATE FILING OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30,
2006
A Special Committee of our Board of Directors conducted an investigation of our past stock option
granting practices and announced its findings on November 17, 2006. Because we did not know the
financial impact of the Special Committees investigation, we were not able to timely file our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for our second quarter ended June 30, 2006. We have completed
calculating the financial effect utilizing the results of the investigation and are now filing this
Form 10-Q for our second quarter. See Note 2 Restatement of
Financial Statements of the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Restatement of Financial Statements, Special Committee and Company Findings for more
information on the investigation and its financial effects.
This report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by those laws. We have based these
forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These
forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our
operations. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by
reference in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or
anticipate may occur in the future, including such things as growth of our business and operations,
business strategy, competitive strengths, acquisitions, capital expenditures, goals, plans and
references to future successes may be considered forward-looking statements. Also, when we use
words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan, probably or
similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.
Many risks and uncertainties may impact the matters addressed in these forward-looking statements,
which could affect our future financial results and performance, including, among other things:
|
|
|
the effects of catastrophic losses; |
|
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of the insurance business; |
|
|
|
|
inherent uncertainties in the loss estimation process, which can adversely impact the
adequacy of loss reserves; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of emerging claim and coverage issues; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of extensive governmental regulation of the insurance industry; |
|
|
|
|
potential credit risk with brokers; |
|
|
|
|
our increased retention of risk, which could expose us to greater potential losses; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of reinsurance protection; |
|
|
|
|
the ability or willingness of reinsurers to pay balances due us; |
|
|
|
|
the occurrence of terrorist activities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain our competitive position; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our assigned financial strength ratings; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to raise capital in the future; |
|
|
|
|
attraction and retention of qualified employees; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the fixed income securities market, which may reduce the value of our investment assets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully expand our business through the acquisition of insurance-related companies; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to receive dividends from our insurance company subsidiaries in needed amounts; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
failures of our information technology systems, which
could adversely affect our business; |
3
|
|
|
developments in the SECs informal inquiry related to our past practices in connection
with grants of stock options; |
|
|
|
|
potential issues related to the effects of Sections 409A and 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code and any expenses associated therewith; |
|
|
|
|
changes to improve our internal controls related to the process of granting, documenting
and accounting for stock option awards; |
|
|
|
|
additional expenses and taxes associated with our stock option investigation and related matters; |
|
|
|
|
potential litigation that could result from our stock option investigation; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our Executive Officers to define and implement a strategic business plan; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to cure all defaults or events of default under our outstanding loan agreements. |
These events or factors could cause our results or performance to differ materially from those we
express in our forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our
forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of these assumptions, and, therefore, also the
forward-looking statements based on these assumptions, could themselves prove to be inaccurate. In
light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements which are
included in this report, our inclusion of this information is not a representation by us or any
other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Our forward-looking statements speak only at the date made and we will not update these
forward-looking statements unless the securities laws require us to do so. In light of these
risks, uncertainties and assumptions, any forward-looking events discussed in this report may not
occur.
4
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
securities, at fair value
(amortized cost: 2006 - $2,741,514; 2005 - $2,277,139) |
|
$ |
2,687,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,268,624 |
|
Short-term investments, at cost, which approximates fair value |
|
|
623,138 |
|
|
|
839,581 |
|
Other investments, at fair value (cost: 2006 - $242,526; 2005 - $144,897) |
|
|
257,022 |
|
|
|
149,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
3,567,601 |
|
|
|
3,257,428 |
|
Cash |
|
|
44,342 |
|
|
|
73,935 |
|
Restricted cash and cash investments |
|
|
167,073 |
|
|
|
170,978 |
|
Premium, claims and other receivables |
|
|
896,983 |
|
|
|
884,654 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
1,353,288 |
|
|
|
1,361,983 |
|
Ceded unearned premium |
|
|
238,281 |
|
|
|
239,416 |
|
Ceded life and annuity benefits |
|
|
72,782 |
|
|
|
73,415 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
177,982 |
|
|
|
156,253 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
531,760 |
|
|
|
532,947 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
321,559 |
|
|
|
277,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,371,651 |
|
|
$ |
7,028,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense payable |
|
$ |
2,918,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,813,720 |
|
Life and annuity policy benefits |
|
|
72,782 |
|
|
|
73,415 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
154,248 |
|
|
|
176,954 |
|
Unearned premium |
|
|
910,188 |
|
|
|
807,109 |
|
Deferred ceding commissions |
|
|
67,325 |
|
|
|
67,886 |
|
Premium and claims payable |
|
|
735,120 |
|
|
|
753,859 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
337,274 |
|
|
|
309,543 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
345,675 |
|
|
|
335,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,541,053 |
|
|
|
5,338,365 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 250.0 million shares authorized
(shares issued and outstanding: 2006 111,253; 2005 110,803) |
|
|
111,253 |
|
|
|
110,803 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
778,128 |
|
|
|
762,170 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
947,211 |
|
|
|
798,388 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(5,994 |
) |
|
|
19,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,830,598 |
|
|
|
1,690,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
7,371,651 |
|
|
$ |
7,028,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premium |
|
$ |
783,891 |
|
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
$ |
403,320 |
|
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
Fee and commission income |
|
|
65,547 |
|
|
|
68,926 |
|
|
|
33,878 |
|
|
|
37,303 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
72,754 |
|
|
|
45,041 |
|
|
|
36,173 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
Net realized investment gain (loss) |
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
2,003 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
38,795 |
|
|
|
9,252 |
|
|
|
20,045 |
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
959,490 |
|
|
|
783,062 |
|
|
|
493,217 |
|
|
|
404,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense, net |
|
|
453,092 |
|
|
|
384,164 |
|
|
|
231,025 |
|
|
|
198,189 |
|
Policy acquisition costs, net |
|
|
152,809 |
|
|
|
121,988 |
|
|
|
76,577 |
|
|
|
60,843 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
97,002 |
|
|
|
95,871 |
|
|
|
49,669 |
|
|
|
50,194 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
707,340 |
|
|
|
605,801 |
|
|
|
359,554 |
|
|
|
311,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
252,150 |
|
|
|
177,261 |
|
|
|
133,663 |
|
|
|
93,641 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
83,864 |
|
|
|
58,517 |
|
|
|
44,519 |
|
|
|
30,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168,286 |
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
89,144 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
111,117 |
|
|
|
104,106 |
|
|
|
111,218 |
|
|
|
104,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
116,885 |
|
|
|
107,042 |
|
|
|
116,860 |
|
|
|
108,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared, per share |
|
$ |
0.175 |
|
|
$ |
0.132 |
|
|
$ |
0.100 |
|
|
$ |
0.075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Six months ended June 30, 2006
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
110,803 |
|
|
$ |
762,170 |
|
|
$ |
798,388 |
|
|
$ |
19,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,690,435 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,286 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,068 |
) |
|
|
(25,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,218 |
|
Issuance of 450 shares for exercise of
options, including tax benefit of $2,264 |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
9,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,660 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,748 |
|
Cash dividends declared, $0.175 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
111,253 |
|
|
$ |
778,128 |
|
|
$ |
947,211 |
|
|
$ |
(5,994 |
) |
|
$ |
1,830,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168,286 |
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
89,144 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in premium, claims and other
receivables |
|
|
(10,298 |
) |
|
|
(90,611 |
) |
|
|
(54,660 |
) |
|
|
41,597 |
|
Change in reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
(19,014 |
) |
|
|
(3,937 |
) |
|
|
(18,190 |
) |
Change in ceded unearned premium |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
45,861 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
Change in loss and loss adjustment
expense payable |
|
|
104,721 |
|
|
|
124,887 |
|
|
|
80,946 |
|
|
|
75,036 |
|
Change in reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
(22,706 |
) |
|
|
(39,650 |
) |
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
(20,868 |
) |
Change in unearned premium |
|
|
103,079 |
|
|
|
25,536 |
|
|
|
84,813 |
|
|
|
42,378 |
|
Change in premium and claims payable,
net of restricted cash |
|
|
(17,222 |
) |
|
|
15,536 |
|
|
|
13,096 |
|
|
|
(84,339 |
) |
Change in trading portfolio |
|
|
(84,491 |
) |
|
|
(38,054 |
) |
|
|
(36,497 |
) |
|
|
3,274 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
7,644 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
6,090 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
3,387 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(4,992 |
) |
|
|
(32,928 |
) |
|
|
(3,861 |
) |
|
|
(20,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
259,941 |
|
|
|
118,837 |
|
|
|
181,850 |
|
|
|
84,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed income securities |
|
|
164,097 |
|
|
|
114,770 |
|
|
|
98,443 |
|
|
|
59,089 |
|
Maturity or call of fixed income securities |
|
|
117,698 |
|
|
|
98,468 |
|
|
|
58,472 |
|
|
|
66,218 |
|
Cost of securities acquired |
|
|
(791,385 |
) |
|
|
(498,144 |
) |
|
|
(319,771 |
) |
|
|
(221,144 |
) |
Change in short-term investments |
|
|
218,856 |
|
|
|
181,716 |
|
|
|
(27,894 |
) |
|
|
36,691 |
|
Sale of strategic investment |
|
|
17,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchase of subsidiaries, net
of cash received |
|
|
(37,457 |
) |
|
|
(34,881 |
) |
|
|
(13,457 |
) |
|
|
(34,881 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(5,097 |
) |
|
|
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
(3,050 |
) |
|
|
(10,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(315,925 |
) |
|
|
(149,449 |
) |
|
|
(207,257 |
) |
|
|
(104,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of notes payable |
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
Payments on notes payable |
|
|
(11,249 |
) |
|
|
(14,465 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(14,372 |
) |
Sale of common stock |
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
28,837 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
7,750 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(16,648 |
) |
|
|
(11,716 |
) |
|
|
(8,338 |
) |
|
|
(5,933 |
) |
Other |
|
|
5,628 |
|
|
|
(3,814 |
) |
|
|
(2,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing
activities |
|
|
26,391 |
|
|
|
31,842 |
|
|
|
18,638 |
|
|
|
20,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(29,593 |
) |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
(6,769 |
) |
|
|
1,086 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
73,935 |
|
|
|
69,933 |
|
|
|
51,111 |
|
|
|
70,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
44,342 |
|
|
$ |
71,163 |
|
|
$ |
44,342 |
|
|
$ |
71,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
(1) |
|
GENERAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us or our) include
domestic and foreign property and casualty and life insurance companies, underwriting
agencies and reinsurance brokers. We provide specialized property and casualty, surety, and
group life, accident and health insurance coverages and related agency and reinsurance
brokerage services to commercial customers and individuals. We market our products both
directly to customers and through a network of independent brokers, producers and agents.
Our lines of business include diversified financial products (which includes directors and
officers liability, professional indemnity, employment practices liability and surety);
group life, accident and health; aviation; London market account (which includes energy,
marine, property, and accident and health); and other specialty lines of insurance. We
operate primarily in the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain and Bermuda, although some
of our operations have a broader international scope. |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
|
|
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting
principles) and include the accounts of HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
and its subsidiaries. We have made all adjustments that, in our
opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of results of the
interim periods, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual
audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. The
condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2005 was derived
from audited financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
|
|
|
|
Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts
reported in our financial statements and in disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities. Ultimate results could differ from those
estimates. We have reclassified certain amounts in our 2005 condensed
consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation.
The reclassifications included the elimination of certain
intercompany premium receivable and premium payable balances and
reclassification of the corresponding lines in our 2005 condensed
statements of cash flows. None of these reclassifications had an
effect on our consolidated net earnings, shareholders equity or cash
flows. |
|
|
|
During 2006 and 2005, we completed several acquisitions. The results
of operations of the acquired entities are included in our condensed
consolidated financial statements beginning on the effective date of
each acquisition. Thus, our condensed consolidated statements of
earnings and cash flows for the six months and three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005 do not contain any operations of the entities
acquired in 2006 or 2005 prior to their acquisition date. |
|
|
|
Income Tax |
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the income tax provision was calculated
based on an estimated effective tax rate for each fiscal year. Our effective tax rate
differs from the United States Federal statutory rate primarily due to tax-exempt municipal
bond interest, state income taxes and a special $1.8 million U.S. repatriation tax benefit in
2005. |
9
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Recent Accounting Change |
|
|
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Effective January 1, 2007, FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertain income tax positions. We are currently reviewing the requirements
of FIN 48 to determine the effect it will have on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
The FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which clarified the
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. SFAS
157 does not require any new fair value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in
guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 will be effective for us
on January 1, 2008. We are currently assessing whether the adoption of SFAS 157 will have an
impact on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 establishes a standard approach for quantifying the
materiality of errors to current and prior period financial statements. SAB 108s guidelines
must be applied in the fourth quarter, and adjustments, if any, will be recorded either by
restating prior year financial statements or recording a cumulative effect adjustment as of
January 1, 2006. We believe the requirements of SAB 108 will
have no effect on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
(2) |
|
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
In light of published reports concerning the pricing of stock options and the timing of stock
option grants at numerous other companies, in the second quarter of 2006 we undertook a
voluntary internal review of our past practices related to grants of stock options. The
voluntary review by our management concluded that the actual accounting measurement dates for
certain past stock option grants differed from the originally stated grant dates, which were
also utilized as the measurement dates for such awards. In August 2006, our Board of
Directors formed a Special Committee of independent directors to commence an investigation of
our past stock option granting practices for the period 1995 through 2005. The Special
Committee was composed of the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The
Special Committee retained the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP as its
independent legal counsel and LECG as forensic accountants to aid in the investigation. |
|
|
|
On November 17, 2006, we announced that the Special Committee had made certain determinations
as a result of its review of our past stock option granting practices. The Special Committee
found that we had used incorrect accounting measurement dates for stock option grants
covering a significant number of employees and members of our Board of Directors during the
period 1997 through 2005 and that certain option grants were retroactively priced.
Additionally, at the direction of the Special Committee, we reviewed our stock option
granting practices from 1992, the year of our initial public stock offering, through 1994 and
in 2006 and found incorrect measurement dates due to retroactive pricing were used in 2006.
In substantially all of these instances, the price on the actual measurement date was higher
than the price on the stated grant date; thus recipients of the options could exercise at a
strike price lower than the actual measurement date price. To determine the actual
measurement dates, the Special Committee utilized the following sources of information: |
|
|
|
The dates on documentation such as e-mails, regulatory form filings, acquisition
agreements and other correspondence; |
10
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
The date that the relevant stock option grant was entered into Equity Edge, our stock
option tracking and accounting system; |
|
|
|
Requirements of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations; and |
|
|
|
Guidance from the Office of Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) contained in a letter dated September 19, 2006. |
The Special Committee concluded that mis-priced option grants, the effect of which, together
with certain other adjustments, resulted in a cumulative net decrease in shareholders equity
at December 31, 2005 of $3.3 million, affected all levels of employees. The Special
Committee found that Stephen L. Way, Chief Executive Officer, retroactively priced options,
that he should have known he was granting options in a manner that conflicted with our stock
option plans and public statements, and that this constituted a failure to align the stock
option granting process with our stock option plans and public
statements. Although finding his
actions were inconsistent with the duties and obligations of a chief executive officer of a
publicly-traded company, the Special Committee also found that Mr. Ways motivation appeared
to be the attraction and retention of talent and to provide employees with the best option
price. The Special Committee also concluded that Christopher L. Martin, Executive Vice
President and General Counsel, was aware that options were being retroactively priced in a
manner inconsistent with applicable plan terms and the procedures memoranda that he had
prepared, that granting in-the-money options had accounting implications, and that he did not
properly document our Compensation Committees informal delegation of authority to Mr. Way.
The Special Committee also found that there was no evidence that Mr. Way or Mr. Martin
intended to falsify the consolidated financial statements.
Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results
of the investigation, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of
Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Board of Directors determined that it
would be appropriate to accept the resignations of Mr. Way and Mr. Martin, which both
tendered on November 17, 2006. Mr. Way will remain a director of HCC and serve as the
non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and has entered into a consulting agreement
with us to assist in the transition of leadership and to provide strategic guidance. We have
entered into agreements with Mr. Way and Mr. Martin which, among other things, require them
to disgorge an amount equal to the difference between the actual measurement date prices
determined by HCC and the prices at which these individuals exercised mis-priced options
since 1997.
11
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
As a result of the determinations of the Special Committee
and because the resulting cumulative charge would be material to the second quarter and full year 2006 consolidated
net earnings,
we concluded that we needed to amend our 2005
Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K and our first quarter 2006 quarterly report
filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q, to restate our consolidated financial statements and
disclosures.
The amended Forms 10-K/A and 10-Q/A have been filed with the SEC. We made the
restatement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to record the
following:
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense for the difference between the stock price on the
stated grant date and the actual measurement date and for the fluctuations in stock
price in certain instances where variable accounting should have been
applied. |
|
|
|
|
Other minor adjustments that were not recorded in the originally filed financial
statements due to their immateriality. These minor adjustments primarily relate to fee and
commission income, loss and loss adjustment expense, policy
acquisition costs and other operating expense. In addition, balance
sheet reclassifications have been recorded to appropriately present
certain reinsurance recoverables and payables. |
|
|
|
|
Related tax effects associated with the recognition of
non-cash compensation expense and other adjustments as well as
additional taxes that may be due and payable. |
We have not amended any of our other previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K or
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement other than noted
above. For this reason, the consolidated financial statements and related financial
information contained in such previously filed reports should no longer be relied upon.
We were unable to timely file our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June
30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, primarily due to not knowing the financial impact of the
Special Committees investigation. We have also
restated the June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 financial statements included in our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the respective 2006 quarters.
Based on the determinations of the Special Committee and our voluntary internal review, we
identified a number of occasions during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 on which
we used an incorrect measurement date for financial accounting and reporting purposes for
options granted. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, we should have recorded
compensation expense related to these options for the excess of the market price of our stock
on the actual measurement date over the exercise price of the option. For periods commencing
January 1, 2006, compensation expense is being recognized in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R) (revised), Share-Based Payment. However,
we determined an incremental amount related to the mis-priced options must be recorded.
12
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
The types of errors identified were as follows:
|
|
We determined that many block grants to employees during the period 1997 through
2005 were subject to a retroactive look-back period. In all such cases, the price of our
stock at the end of the look-back period, which was generally 30 days or less, was higher
than the price of our stock on the stated grant date. |
|
|
|
In addition to being subject to the retroactive pricing discussed above, we
determined that the strike price of block grants in 1999, 2002 and 2005 was determined
prior to the final determination of the identity of the employee and/or the number of
options to be granted. Further, proper approval, in most cases, had not been given until
after the grant date. In all such cases, the price of our stock at the time when all
required determinations were final and proper approval had been obtained was higher than
the price of our stock on the stated grant date. The time lag between the stated grant
date and the finalization of the awards was typically 30-45 days, except in the case of
the 2002 grant which was finalized several months subsequent to the stated grant date. |
|
|
|
For the period from 1997 to 2005 and into 2006,
we determined that there was a regular practice of granting options to newly hired employees and existing employees
being promoted after the end of a 30-45 day period following the hire or promotion date.
This practice included the use of the 30-45 day period as a look-back period during which
the date with the lowest price during that period was selected as the stated grant date. |
|
|
|
In several instances, grants to senior executives were determined at a date
subsequent to the stated grant date. In most cases, this resulted from extended
negotiations of employment agreements and, in some cases, administrative delays. In
virtually all cases, the price of our stock at the time the grants were made and properly
approved was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date. |
|
|
|
In a few cases, options were granted and then
repriced downward. As a result, variable accounting should have been applied to
these options. |
|
|
|
We lacked timely or adequate documentation to support the stated grant date in
the case of certain of the above errors. |
The gross compensation expense recorded to correct the above errors was a non-cash charge and
had no impact on our reported net revenue, cash, cash flow or shareholders equity.
In connection with the investigation, we determined that a number of executive officers
received in-the-money options. If such options are ultimately determined to be in-the-money
grants for tax purposes, pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and, if in
the year of exercise the officers compensation, including proceeds from options exercised,
exceeded $1.0 million, we would not be entitled to a tax deduction for any amount in excess
of such $1.0 million for officers covered by
Section 162(m). We estimate the tax effect of the deduction
was $4.6 million, substantially all of which was recorded as a reduction to shareholders
equity.
There were immaterial adjustments that were not made in the originally filed consolidated
financial statements. We have taken the opportunity presented by this restatement to
record these adjustments, which amounted to a net $2.4 million increase in earnings from
continuing operations before income tax expense, for the years 2001 through 2005.
13
The
increase (decrease) on net earnings of each type of adjustment was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings as |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
previously reported |
|
|
expense |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Tax effect |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
as restated |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
121,376 |
|
|
$ |
(1,390 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,453 |
) |
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
(2,632 |
) |
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
64,058 |
|
|
$ |
(662 |
) |
|
$ |
(300 |
) |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
|
The restatement adjustments reduced previously reported diluted net earnings per share
by $0.02 and $0.00 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
Enacted October 22, 2004, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code significantly changed the
rules for nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Section 409A imposes certain
restrictions and taxes on stock awards that constitute deferred
compensation. Section 409A relates specifically to the personal
tax liabilities of our employees that have received discounted
options. We are currently
reviewing the implications of Section 409A on grants awarded with intrinsic value that vested
after December 31, 2004 and modifications made to existing grants after October 3, 2004 along
with potential remedial actions. |
|
|
|
As of December 15, 2006, we have paid direct costs of approximately $6.0 million for costs
associated with the Special Committees investigation and additional related professional
services and consulting fees associated with the restatement effort.
|
14
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
The following table sets forth the impact of the above adjustments and the related tax
effects on our historical statements of earnings for the six and three months ended June 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30 , 2005 |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As restated |
|
|
reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As restated |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premium |
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
Fee and commission income |
|
|
70,379 |
|
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
68,926 |
|
|
|
37,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,303 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
45,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,041 |
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,700 |
|
Net realized investment gain |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
9,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,252 |
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
784,515 |
|
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
783,062 |
|
|
|
404,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment
expense, net |
|
|
384,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,164 |
|
|
|
198,101 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
198,189 |
|
Policy acquisition costs, net |
|
|
119,988 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
121,988 |
|
|
|
60,631 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
60,843 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
95,481 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
95,871 |
|
|
|
49,532 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
50,194 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
603,411 |
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
605,801 |
|
|
|
310,234 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
311,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations
before income tax expense |
|
|
181,104 |
|
|
|
(3,843 |
) |
|
|
177,261 |
|
|
|
94,603 |
|
|
|
(962 |
) |
|
|
93,641 |
|
Income tax expense on continuing
operations |
|
|
59,728 |
|
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
58,517 |
|
|
|
30,545 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
30,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
121,376 |
|
|
|
(2,632 |
) |
|
|
118,744 |
|
|
|
64,058 |
|
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
63,356 |
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
121,376 |
|
|
$ |
(2,632 |
) |
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
64,058 |
|
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
104,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,106 |
|
|
|
104,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Earnings from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
107,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,042 |
|
|
|
108,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
The restatement did not impact our net cash flows from operating, investing, or financing
activities. However, certain items within net cash provided by operating activities were affected
by the restatement adjustments. The following table shows the effect of the restatement on our
previously reported cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
As restated |
|
|
reported |
|
|
As restated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
121,376 |
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
64,058 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings
to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in premium, claims and other
receivables |
|
|
(76,659 |
) |
|
|
(90,611 |
) |
|
|
47,234 |
|
|
|
41,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
(17,530 |
) |
|
|
(19,014 |
) |
|
|
(17,781 |
) |
|
|
(18,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in ceded unearned premium |
|
|
50,943 |
|
|
|
45,861 |
|
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in loss and loss adjustment
expense payable |
|
|
124,887 |
|
|
|
124,887 |
|
|
|
74,948 |
|
|
|
75,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
(50,710 |
) |
|
|
(39,650 |
) |
|
|
(20,868 |
) |
|
|
(20,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in
premium and claims payable, net of restricted cash |
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
15,536 |
|
|
|
(90,385 |
) |
|
|
(84,339 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(26,852 |
) |
|
|
(32,928 |
) |
|
|
(20,223 |
) |
|
|
(20,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
16
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
In connection with the preparation of our restated financial statements, we also determined
that the pro forma disclosures for stock-based compensation expense for the six and three
months ended June 30, 2005 required under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
included in Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, were incorrect.
Specifically, the errors related to the effect on the consolidated financial statements
resulting from the improper application of APB No. 25 to certain stock option transactions and
the use of assumptions for determining the fair value of our stock options on the date of
grant. We have corrected these errors in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
The
following table presents the effect of those corrections on our
pro forma calculation of our net income and earnings per share
for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
restated |
|
|
reported |
|
|
restated |
|
Reported net earnings |
|
$ |
121,376 |
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
64,058 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
Stock-based compensation included
in reported net earnings,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
Stock-based compensation using fair
value method, net of income taxes |
|
|
(2,690 |
) |
|
|
(3,338 |
) |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings |
|
$ |
118,686 |
|
|
$ |
116,444 |
|
|
$ |
62,645 |
|
|
$ |
62,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Fair value stock-based compensation |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Fair value stock-based compensation |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
(3) |
|
STOCK OPTIONS |
|
|
|
Our stock option plans, the 2004 Flexible Incentive Plan and 2001 Flexible Incentive Plan,
are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Options granted
under these plans may be used to purchase one share of our common stock. Options vest over a
period of up to seven years, which is the requisite service period, and expire four to ten
years after grant date. |
|
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires
companies to charge the fair value of stock-based compensation to earnings. Effective
January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method. We are
recognizing compensation expense in 2006 and thereafter based on our unvested stock options
granted before January 1, 2006 and all options granted after that date. The 2005 and prior
period financial statements were not restated to reflect the implementation of SFAS 123(R).
We use the Black-Scholes single option pricing model to determine the fair value of an option
on its grant date and expense that value on a straight-line basis over the options vesting
period. We made no modifications to our stock option plans in conjunction with our adoption
of SFAS 123(R). In 2005, we accounted for stock options granted to employees in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employee. |
|
|
|
In the first six months of 2006, we expensed $6.1 million ($4.3 million after tax or $0.04
per diluted share) of stock-based compensation, after the effect of the deferral and
amortization of related policy acquisition costs. We expensed $3.4 million ($2.4 million
after tax or $0.02 per diluted share) in the second quarter of 2006. At June 30, 2006, there
was approximately $36.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to
unvested options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three
years. In 2006, we expect to recognize $12.8 million of expense, including the amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs, related to stock-based compensation for options
currently outstanding. |
|
|
|
The table below shows the weighted-average fair value of options granted and the related
weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model. The risk-free interest rate is
based on the U.S. Treasury rate that most closely approximates each options expected term.
We based our expected volatility on the historical volatility of our stock over a period
matching each options expected term. Our dividend yield is based on an average of our
historical dividend payments divided by the stock price. We used historical exercise
patterns by grant type to estimate the expected option life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
7.08 |
|
|
$ |
7.94 |
|
|
$ |
7.15 |
|
|
$ |
7.98 |
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Expected option life |
|
3.6 years |
|
4.8 years |
|
3.9 years |
|
4.7 years |
18
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
The following table details our stock option activity during the six months ended June 30,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
intrinsic |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
price |
|
|
life |
|
|
value |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
8,219 |
|
|
$ |
20.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
31.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
16.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
20.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period |
|
|
8,353 |
|
|
|
21.87 |
|
|
4.1 years |
|
$ |
64,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period |
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
17.51 |
|
|
2.8 years |
|
|
20,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value (the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock
exceeds the exercise price) of options exercised during the first six months of 2006 and 2005
was $7.1 million and $19.2 million, respectively. At June 30, 2006, 12.1 million shares of
our common stock were authorized and reserved for the exercise of options, of which 8.4
million shares were reserved for options previously granted and 3.7 million shares were
reserved for future issuance.
19
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
Exercise of options during the first six months of 2006 and 2005 resulted in cash receipts of
$7.4 million and $28.8 million, respectively. We generally recognize a tax benefit when our
employees exercise options. SFAS 123(R) requires that we report the tax benefit related to
the excess of the tax deductible amount over the recognized compensation expense as financing
cash flow, rather than as operating cash flow under APB 25. We recorded a $2.3 million
benefit as financing cash flow in the first six months of 2006 and $2.7 million as operating
cash flow in the first six months of 2005.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we accounted for stock-based compensation using the
intrinsic value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. Under
APB Opinion No. 25, compensation cost was measured as of the date the number of shares and
exercise price became fixed. The terms of an award were generally fixed on the date of grant,
requiring the stock option to be accounted for as a fixed award. For fixed awards,
compensation expense was measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our
stock at the date of grant over the exercise price of the option granted. Compensation
expense for fixed awards, if any, was recognized ratably over the vesting period using the
straight-line single option method.
If the number of shares or
exercise price was not fixed upon the date of grant, the award was
accounted for as a variable award until the number of shares or the exercise price became
fixed, or until the award was exercised, canceled, or expired unexercised. For variable
awards, intrinsic value was remeasured each period and was equal to the fair market value of
our stock as of the end of the reporting period less the grant exercise price. As a result,
the amount of compensation expense or benefit to be recognized each period fluctuated based
on changes in our closing price from the end of the previous reporting period to the end of
the current reporting period. In cases when our closing stock price did not exceed the
recipients exercise price, no compensation expense resulted. Compensation expense for
variable awards, if any, was recognized in accordance with FIN No. 28, Accounting for Stock
Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award
Plan, An Interpretation of APB
Opinions No. 15 and 25.
We accounted for modifications to
stock options under APB No. 25, as subsequently interpreted
by FIN No. 44. Modifications included, but were not limited to, acceleration of vesting, extension of the
exercise period following termination of employment and/or continued vesting while not
providing substantive services. Compensation expense for modified awards was recorded in the
period of modification for the intrinsic value of the vested portion of the award, including
vesting that occurred while not providing substantive services, after the date of modification.
The intrinsic value of the award was the difference between the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of modification and the recipients exercise price.
Stock options issued to non-employees were
accounted for in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123 and EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.
Compensation expense for stock options issued to non-employees was valued using the
Black-Scholes model and was amortized over the vesting period in accordance with FIN No. 28.
20
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
Prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R), we were required to disclose the effect on net earnings
and earnings per share if we had used the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, to value stock options. The effect on our consolidated financial
results in 2005 if we had valued our options using the fair value method under SFAS 123 and
the assumptions listed above is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Reported net earnings |
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
Stock-based compensation included in reported net earnings,
net of income taxes |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Stock-based compensation using
fair value method, net of income taxes |
|
|
(3,338 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings |
|
$ |
116,444 |
|
|
$ |
62,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
Fair value stock-based compensation |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Fair value stock-based compensation |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
(4) |
|
REINSURANCE |
|
|
|
In the normal course of business, our insurance companies cede a portion of their
premium to domestic and foreign reinsurers through treaty and facultative reinsurance
agreements. Although ceding for reinsurance purposes does not discharge the primary insurer
from liability to its policyholder, our insurance companies participate in such agreements in
order to limit their loss exposure, protect them against catastrophic loss and diversify
their business. The following table presents the effect of such reinsurance transactions on
our premium and loss and loss adjustment expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss |
|
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
|
premium |
|
|
premium |
|
|
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary business |
|
$ |
932,332 |
|
|
$ |
866,566 |
|
|
$ |
476,183 |
|
Reinsurance assumed |
|
|
159,780 |
|
|
|
135,596 |
|
|
|
83,123 |
|
Reinsurance ceded |
|
|
(215,579 |
) |
|
|
(218,271 |
) |
|
|
(106,214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts |
|
$ |
876,533 |
|
|
$ |
783,891 |
|
|
$ |
453,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary business |
|
$ |
864,076 |
|
|
$ |
828,736 |
|
|
$ |
464,367 |
|
Reinsurance assumed |
|
|
150,479 |
|
|
|
150,864 |
|
|
|
98,833 |
|
Reinsurance ceded |
|
|
(278,810 |
) |
|
|
(321,757 |
) |
|
|
(179,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts |
|
$ |
735,745 |
|
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
$ |
384,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary business |
|
$ |
522,141 |
|
|
$ |
444,056 |
|
|
$ |
248,933 |
|
Reinsurance assumed |
|
|
63,913 |
|
|
|
64,716 |
|
|
|
37,332 |
|
Reinsurance ceded |
|
|
(102,572 |
) |
|
|
(105,452 |
) |
|
|
(55,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts |
|
$ |
483,482 |
|
|
$ |
403,320 |
|
|
$ |
231,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary business |
|
$ |
465,795 |
|
|
$ |
416,641 |
|
|
$ |
242,921 |
|
Reinsurance assumed |
|
|
73,641 |
|
|
|
78,284 |
|
|
|
50,327 |
|
Reinsurance ceded |
|
|
(161,043 |
) |
|
|
(157,199 |
) |
|
|
(95,059 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amounts |
|
$ |
378,393 |
|
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
|
$ |
198,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
Ceding commissions netted with policy acquisition costs in the condensed consolidated
statements of earnings were $22.5 million in the first six months of 2006 and $54.6 million
in the first six months of 2005.
The table below shows the components of reinsurance recoverables in our condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses |
|
$ |
119,364 |
|
|
$ |
93,837 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on outstanding losses |
|
|
720,102 |
|
|
|
636,225 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on incurred but not reported losses |
|
|
525,715 |
|
|
|
644,062 |
|
Reserve for uncollectible reinsurance |
|
|
(11,893 |
) |
|
|
(12,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reinsurance recoverables |
|
$ |
1,353,288 |
|
|
$ |
1,361,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our reserve for uncollectible reinsurance covers potential collectibility issues, including
disputed amounts and associated expenses. While we believe the reserve is adequate based on
information currently available, conditions may change or additional information might be
obtained which may require us to change the reserve in the future. We periodically review
our financial exposure to the reinsurance market and the level of our reserve and continue to
take actions in an attempt to mitigate our exposure to possible loss.
We limit the liquidity exposure related to our reinsurance recoverables by holding funds,
letters of credit or other security, such that net balances due are significantly less than
the gross balances shown in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, our
U.S. domiciled insurance companies require their reinsurers not authorized by the respective
states of domicile of our insurance companies to collateralize their reinsurance obligations
due to us. The table below shows the amounts of letters of credit and cash deposits held by
us as collateral, plus other credits available for potential offset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Payables to reinsurers |
|
$ |
274,754 |
|
|
$ |
291,826 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
354,204 |
|
|
|
350,135 |
|
Cash deposits |
|
|
58,666 |
|
|
|
64,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credits |
|
$ |
687,624 |
|
|
$ |
706,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
The tables below present the calculation of net reserves, net unearned premium and net
deferred policy acquisition costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense payable |
|
$ |
2,918,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,813,720 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable on outstanding losses |
|
|
(720,102 |
) |
|
|
(636,225 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable on incurred but not reported losses |
|
|
(525,715 |
) |
|
|
(644,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves |
|
$ |
1,672,624 |
|
|
$ |
1,533,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premium |
|
$ |
910,188 |
|
|
$ |
807,109 |
|
Ceded unearned premium |
|
|
(238,281 |
) |
|
|
(239,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unearned premium |
|
$ |
671,907 |
|
|
$ |
567,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
$ |
177,982 |
|
|
$ |
156,253 |
|
Deferred ceding commissions |
|
|
(67,325 |
) |
|
|
(67,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
$ |
110,657 |
|
|
$ |
88,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
The following table details the numerator and denominator used in the earnings per share
calculations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168,286 |
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
89,144 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
111,117 |
|
|
|
104,106 |
|
|
|
111,218 |
|
|
|
104,962 |
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding options
(determined using the treasury stock
method) |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
Dilutive effect of convertible debt
(determined using the treasury stock
method) |
|
|
4,276 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and
potential common shares outstanding |
|
|
116,885 |
|
|
|
107,042 |
|
|
|
116,860 |
|
|
|
108,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive stock options not included in
treasury stock method computation |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
(7) |
|
SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION |
The performance of each segment is evaluated by our management based on net earnings. Net
earnings is calculated after tax and after all corporate expense allocations, interest
expense on debt incurred at the purchase date, and intercompany eliminations have been
charged or credited to our individual segments. All stock-based compensation is included in
the corporate segment since it is not included in managements evaluation of the other
segments. The following tables show information by business segment and geographic location.
Geographic location is determined by physical location of our offices and does not represent
the location of insureds or reinsureds from whom the business was generated. Effective April
1, 2006 and January 1, 2005, we consolidated two underwriting agencies into two insurance
companies and all operations after those dates have been reported in our insurance company
segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Agency |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
703,602 |
|
|
$ |
29,675 |
|
|
$ |
38,894 |
|
|
$ |
2,514 |
|
|
$ |
774,685 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
164,999 |
|
|
|
19,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,805 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
37,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
868,614 |
|
|
$ |
86,650 |
|
|
$ |
38,894 |
|
|
$ |
2,514 |
|
|
|
996,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
959,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
104,695 |
|
|
$ |
13,373 |
|
|
$ |
25,115 |
|
|
$ |
(6,044 |
) |
|
$ |
137,139 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
24,798 |
|
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net earnings
(loss) |
|
$ |
129,493 |
|
|
$ |
19,617 |
|
|
$ |
25,115 |
|
|
$ |
(6,044 |
) |
|
|
168,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
65,381 |
|
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
|
$ |
1,878 |
|
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
$ |
72,754 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
7,644 |
|
Interest expense (benefit) |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(2,415 |
) |
|
|
4,437 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
3,267 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
60,457 |
|
|
|
14,077 |
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
|
|
83,702 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income tax
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
83,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Agency |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, 2005 (As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
579,455 |
|
|
$ |
29,864 |
|
|
$ |
6,385 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
616,909 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
145,025 |
|
|
|
21,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,153 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
44,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
724,621 |
|
|
$ |
95,716 |
|
|
$ |
6,385 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
|
827,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
783,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
73,529 |
|
|
$ |
16,543 |
|
|
$ |
3,895 |
|
|
$ |
(3,254 |
) |
|
$ |
90,713 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
22,628 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net earnings
(loss) |
|
$ |
96,157 |
|
|
$ |
20,129 |
|
|
$ |
3,895 |
|
|
$ |
(3,254 |
) |
|
|
116,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
40,615 |
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
45,041 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
Interest expense (benefit) |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
(1,211 |
) |
|
|
3,778 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
43,556 |
|
|
|
14,013 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
(1,468 |
) |
|
|
57,451 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income tax
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Agency |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
359,914 |
|
|
$ |
14,906 |
|
|
$ |
19,113 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
395,270 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
88,150 |
|
|
|
9,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,947 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
448,071 |
|
|
$ |
43,914 |
|
|
$ |
19,113 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
|
512,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
493,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
54,726 |
|
|
$ |
8,138 |
|
|
$ |
12,126 |
|
|
$ |
(2,930 |
) |
|
$ |
72,060 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
14,710 |
|
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net earnings
(loss) |
|
$ |
69,436 |
|
|
$ |
10,693 |
|
|
$ |
12,126 |
|
|
$ |
(2,930 |
) |
|
|
89,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
33,374 |
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
36,173 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
Interest expense (benefit) |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
2,283 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
32,361 |
|
|
|
7,409 |
|
|
|
6,318 |
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
44,655 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income tax
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Agency |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, 2005 (As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
295,783 |
|
|
$ |
17,102 |
|
|
$ |
4,479 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
317,990 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
76,188 |
|
|
|
10,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,847 |
|
Inter-segment |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
23,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
372,016 |
|
|
$ |
50,956 |
|
|
$ |
4,479 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
|
428,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
404,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
38,448 |
|
|
$ |
9,499 |
|
|
$ |
2,804 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
51,419 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net earnings |
|
$ |
49,429 |
|
|
$ |
10,775 |
|
|
$ |
2,804 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
|
63,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
20,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
472 |
|
|
$ |
22,700 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
Interest expense (benefit) |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
1,970 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
23,330 |
|
|
|
7,822 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
30,530 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income tax
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
The following tables present selected revenue items by line of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified financial products |
|
$ |
348,319 |
|
|
$ |
228,330 |
|
|
$ |
179,207 |
|
|
$ |
121,479 |
|
Group life, accident and health |
|
|
256,023 |
|
|
|
255,602 |
|
|
|
128,262 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
Aviation |
|
|
72,231 |
|
|
|
66,809 |
|
|
|
39,034 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
|
London market account |
|
|
48,865 |
|
|
|
57,618 |
|
|
|
26,937 |
|
|
|
30,907 |
|
Other specialty lines |
|
|
58,536 |
|
|
|
44,551 |
|
|
|
29,896 |
|
|
|
23,326 |
|
Discontinued lines |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premium |
|
$ |
783,891 |
|
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
$ |
403,320 |
|
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and casualty |
|
$ |
53,451 |
|
|
$ |
58,871 |
|
|
$ |
28,044 |
|
|
$ |
32,805 |
|
Accident and health |
|
|
12,096 |
|
|
|
10,055 |
|
|
|
5,834 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and commission income |
|
$ |
65,547 |
|
|
$ |
68,926 |
|
|
$ |
33,878 |
|
|
$ |
37,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION |
Supplemental information was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from commutations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,457 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
74,874 |
|
|
|
49,559 |
|
|
|
58,836 |
|
|
|
35,673 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
143,218 |
|
|
|
113,346 |
|
|
|
80,596 |
|
|
|
75,571 |
|
29
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
(8) |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
Litigation |
|
|
|
We are party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that
arise in the normal course of our business. Many of such lawsuits,
arbitrations and other proceedings involve claims under policies
that we underwrite as an insurer or reinsurer, the liabilities for
which, we believe, have been adequately included in our loss
reserves. Also, from time to time, we are a party to lawsuits,
arbitrations and other proceedings that relate to disputes over
contractual relationships with third parties, or that involve
alleged errors and omissions on the part of our subsidiaries. We
have provided accruals for these items to the extent we deem the
losses probable and reasonably estimable. |
|
|
|
We have been engaged in litigation initiated by the appointed
liquidator of a former reinsurer concerning payments made to us
prior to the date of appointment of the liquidator. The disputed
payments, totaling $10.3 million, were made by the now insolvent
reinsurer in connection with a commutation agreement. We reached an
agreement in principle with the liquidator to resolve this matter
in the third quarter of 2006. The expected resolution will not
have a material effect on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. |
|
|
|
In April 2006, we were named as a defendant in a complaint related
to insurance marketing and producer compensation practices. The
lawsuit was filed in Federal District Court in Georgia by a number
of corporate plaintiffs against approximately 100 insurance entity
defendants. The suit has been transferred to the multi-district
litigation proceeding pending in the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated
pre-trial proceedings with suits previously transferred that appear
to the court to involve common questions of fact. The complaint
alleges violations of Federal antitrust law, the Racketeering
Influence and Corrupt Organization Act and various state anti-fraud
laws. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. We are vigorously
contesting this action. |
|
|
|
Although the ultimate outcome of the matters mentioned above cannot be determined at this
time, based on present information, the availability of insurance coverage and advice
received from our outside legal counsel, we believe the resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows. |
|
|
|
Indemnifications |
|
|
|
In conjunction with the sales of business assets and subsidiaries, we have provided
indemnifications to the buyers. Certain indemnifications cover typical representations and
warranties related to our responsibilities to perform under the sales contracts. We cannot
quantify the maximum potential exposure covered by all of our indemnifications because the
indemnifications cover a variety of matters, operations and scenarios. Certain of these
indemnifications have no time limit. For those with a time limit, the longest such
indemnification expires on December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
We accrue a loss related to our indemnifications when a valid claim is made by a buyer and we
believe we have potential exposure. We currently have several claims under indemnifications
that cover certain net losses incurred in periods prior to our sale of certain subsidiaries.
As of June 30, 2006, we have recorded a liability of $14.3 million and have provided $8.1
million of letters of credit to cover our obligations or anticipated payments under these
indemnifications. |
30
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Stock Option Investigation Matters |
|
|
|
Based on the Special Committees voluntary independent investigation of our past practices
related to granting stock options, we determined that the price on the actual measurement date
for a number of our stock option grants during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 did
not correspond to the price on the stated grant date and that certain option grants were
retroactively repriced. The investigation was conducted with the help of a law firm that was
not previously involved with our stock option plans and procedures. The SEC has commenced an
informal inquiry. In connection with its inquiry, we received a document request from the
SEC. We intend to fully cooperate with the informal inquiry. We are unable to predict the
outcome of or the future costs related to the informal inquiry. |
|
(9) |
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
|
|
|
As a result of our delayed filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2006, we are ineligible to register our securities on Form S-3 or use our
previously filed shelf registration statement for sale of our securities by us or resale of
our securities by others until we have timely filed all periodic reports under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for one year. We may use Form S-1 to raise capital and borrow money
utilizing public debt or complete acquisitions of other companies, which could increase
transaction costs and adversely impact our ability to raise capital and borrow money or
complete acquisitions in a timely manner. In addition, the financial strength ratings of our
insurance companies and our debt ratings, which A.M. Best placed under review with negative
implications and Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors affirmed with a stable outlook, if
reduced, might significantly impede our ability to raise capital and borrow money. |
|
|
|
On October 30, 2006, we received a registered letter from U.S. Bank, as trustee for the
holders of our 2.00% Convertible Notes due 2021, 1.30% Convertible Notes due 2023 and 2.00%
Convertible Exchange Notes due 2021, stating that U.S. Bank, as trustee, had not received our
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. If we do not file our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 with the SEC and deliver the
report to the trustee within sixty days from the date notice was
received from the trustee, such
failure to file and deliver will be considered an Event of Default under the indenture
governing the notes. If an Event of Default were to occur under the indentures for any
series of the notes, the trustee or holders of at least 25% of the aggregate principal of such
series then outstanding could declare all the unpaid principal on such series of notes then
outstanding to be immediately due and payable. Likewise, we have not timely delivered our
Form 10-Qs for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2006 as required by the terms of
our Revolving Loan Facility agreement. The banks that are a party to the agreement waived
certain Defaults or Events of Default until January 31, 2007. In addition, our
restatement of our prior year financial statements might be considered an Event of Default
which has been waived until January 31, 2007. Our failure to comply with the covenants in the
indentures for our convertible notes and our Revolving Loan Facility loan agreement in the
future could have a material adverse effect on our stock price, business and financial
condition if we would not have available funds at that time to repay any defaulted debt. A
default and acceleration under the indentures for our convertible notes and loan agreement may
also trigger cross-acceleration under our other debt instruments. |
|
|
|
In
December 2006, our existing Revolving Loan Facility was increased by
$100.0 million to $300.0 million. Pursuant
to the terms of the agreement, the Company can borrow up to $25
million in addition to what is currently borrowed for working capital
purposes. However, the full unfunded amount of the facility would be
available to pay any potential convertible note conversion or put.
|
31
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited, tables in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
On August 3, 2006, we reached an agreement to acquire the assets of the Health Products
Division (the Division) of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America for cash
consideration of $140.0 million and to assume the Divisions outstanding loss reserves. The
Divisions operations include medical stop loss insurance for self-insured corporations and
groups; excess insurance for HMOs; provider excess insurance for integrated delivery systems;
excess medical reinsurance to small and regional insurance carriers; and Life Trac, a network
for providing organ and bone marrow transplants. The Division currently writes more than
$300.0 million in annual gross premium. We plan to integrate the Divisions operations into
HCC Life Insurance Company, within our insurance company segment. Internal funds were utilized
to make the acquisition, which was consummated on October 2, 2006. |
32
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The
following Managements Discussion and Analysis should be read in
conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
the related Notes thereto.
RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In light of published reports concerning the pricing of stock options and the timing of stock
option grants at numerous other companies, in the second quarter of 2006 we undertook a
voluntary internal review of our past practices related to grants of stock options. The
voluntary review by our management concluded that the actual accounting measurement dates for
certain past stock option grants differed from the originally stated grant dates, which were
also utilized as the measurement dates for such awards. In August 2006, our Board of
Directors formed a Special Committee of independent directors to commence an investigation of
our past stock option granting practices for the period 1995 through 2005. The Special
Committee was composed of the members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The
Special Committee retained the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP as its
independent legal counsel and LECG as forensic accountants to aid in the investigation.
On November 17, 2006, we announced that the Special Committee had made certain determinations
as a result of its review of our past stock option granting practices. The Special Committee
found that we had used incorrect accounting measurement dates for stock option grants
covering a significant number of employees and members of our Board of Directors during the
period 1997 through 2005 and that certain option grants were retroactively priced.
Additionally, at the direction of the Special Committee, we reviewed our stock option
granting practices from 1992, the year of our initial public stock offering, through 1994 and
in 2006 and found incorrect measurement dates due to retroactive pricing were used in 2006.
In substantially all of these instances, the price on the actual measurement date was higher
than the price on the stated grant date; thus recipients of the options could exercise at a
strike price lower than the actual measurement date price. To determine the actual
measurement dates, the Special Committee utilized the following sources of information:
The dates on documentation such as e-mails, regulatory form filings, acquisition
agreements and other correspondence;
The date that the relevant stock option grant was entered into Equity Edge, our stock
option tracking and accounting system;
Requirements of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations; and
Guidance from the Office of Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) contained in a letter dated September 19, 2006.
The Special Committee concluded that mis-priced option grants, the effect of which, together
with certain other adjustments, resulted in a cumulative net decrease in shareholders equity
at December 31, 2005 of $3.3 million, affected all levels of employees. The Special
Committee found that Stephen L. Way, Chief Executive Officer, retroactively priced options,
that he should have known he was granting options in a manner that conflicted with our stock
option plans and public statements, and that this constituted a failure to align the stock
option granting process with our stock option plans and public
statements. Although finding his
actions were inconsistent with the duties and obligations of a chief executive officer of a
publicly-traded company, the Special Committee also found that Mr. Ways motivation appeared
to be the attraction and retention of talent and to provide employees with the best option
price. The Special Committee also concluded that Christopher L. Martin, Executive Vice
President and General Counsel, was aware that options were being retroactively priced in a
manner inconsistent with applicable plan terms and the procedures memoranda that he had
prepared, that granting in-the-money options had accounting implications, and that he did not
properly document our Compensation Committees informal delegation of authority to Mr. Way.
The Special Committee also found that there was no evidence that Mr. Way or Mr. Martin
intended to falsify the consolidated financial statements.
33
Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results
of the investigation, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of
Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Board of Directors determined that it
would be appropriate to accept the resignations of Mr. Way and Mr. Martin, which both
tendered on November 17, 2006. Mr. Way will remain a director of HCC and serve as the
non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and has entered into a consulting agreement
with us to assist in the transition of leadership and to provide strategic guidance. We have
entered into agreements with Mr. Way and Mr. Martin which, among other things, require them
to disgorge an amount equal to the difference between the actual measurement date prices
determined by HCC and the prices at which these individuals exercised mis-priced options
since 1997.
As a result of the determinations of
the Special Committee and because the resulting cumulative charge would be material to the second
quarter and full year 2006 consolidated
net earnings, we concluded that we needed to amend our 2005
Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K and our first quarter 2006 quarterly report
filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q, to restate our consolidated financial statements and
disclosures. However, the impact of the restatement in any of the restated periods is not material.
The amended Forms 10-K/A and 10-Q/A have been filed with the SEC. We made the
restatement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to record the
following:
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense for the difference between the stock price on the
stated grant date and the actual measurement date and for the fluctuations in stock
price in certain instances where variable accounting should have been applied; |
|
|
|
|
Other minor adjustments that were not recorded in the originally filed financial
statements due to their immateriality; and |
|
|
|
|
Related tax effects for all items. |
We have not amended any of our other previously filed annual reports on Form 10-K or
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement other than noted
above. For this reason, the consolidated financial statements and related financial
information contained in such previously filed reports should no longer be relied upon.
We were unable to timely file our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June
30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, primarily due to not knowing the financial impact of the
Special Committees investigation. We have also
restated the June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 financial statements included in our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the respective 2006 quarters.
Based on the determinations of the Special Committee and our voluntary internal review, we
identified a number of occasions during the period 1997 through 2005 and into 2006 on which
we used an incorrect measurement date for financial accounting and reporting purposes for
options granted. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, we should have recorded
compensation expense related to these options for the excess of the market price of our stock
on the actual measurement date over the exercise price of the option. For periods commencing
January 1, 2006, compensation expense is being recognized in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R) (revised), Share-Based Payment. However,
we determined an incremental amount related to the mis-priced options must be recorded.
34
The types of errors identified were as follows:
We determined that many block grants to employees during the period 1997 through
2005 were subject to a retroactive look-back period. In all such cases, the price of our
stock at the end of the look-back period, which was generally 30 days or less, was higher
than the price of our stock on the stated grant date.
In addition to being subject to the retroactive pricing discussed above, we
determined that the strike price of block grants in 1999, 2002 and 2005 was determined
prior to the final determination of the identity of the employee and/or the number of
options to be granted. Further, proper approval, in most cases, had not been given until
after the grant date. In all such cases, the price of our stock at the time when all
required determinations were final and proper approval had been obtained was higher than
the price of our stock on the stated grant date. The time lag between the stated grant
date and the finalization of the awards was typically 30-45 days, except in the case of
the 2002 grant which was finalized several months subsequent to the stated grant date.
For the
period from 1997 to 2005 and into 2006, we determined that there was
a regular practice of granting options to newly hired employees and existing employees
being promoted after the end of a 30-45 day period following the hire or promotion date.
This practice included the use of the 30-45 day period as a look-back period during which
the date with the lowest price during that period was selected as the stated grant date.
In several instances, grants to senior executives were determined at a date
subsequent to the stated grant date. In most cases, this resulted from extended
negotiations of employment agreements and, in some cases, administrative delays. In
virtually all cases, the price of our stock at the time the grants were made and properly
approved was higher than the price of our stock on the stated grant date.
In a few cases, options were granted and then repriced downward. As a result, variable accounting should have been applied to
these options.
We lacked timely or adequate documentation to support the stated grant date in
the case of certain of the above errors.
The gross compensation expense recorded to correct the above errors was a non-cash charge and
had no impact on our reported net revenue, cash, cash flow or shareholders equity.
In connection with the investigation, we determined that a number of executive officers
received in-the-money options. If such options are ultimately determined to be in-the-money
grants for tax purposes, pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and, if in
the year of exercise the officers compensation, including proceeds from options exercised,
exceeded $1.0 million, we would not be entitled to a tax deduction for any amount in excess
of such $1.0 million for officers covered by
Section 162(m). We estimate the tax effect of the deduction
was $4.6 million, substantially all of which was recorded as a reduction to shareholders
equity.
There were immaterial adjustments that were not made in the originally filed consolidated
financial statements. We have taken the opportunity presented by this restatement to
record these adjustments, which amounted to a net $2.4 million increase in earnings from
continuing operations before income tax expense, for the years 2001 through 2005.
35
The
increase (decrease) on net earnings of each type of adjustment was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings as |
|
|
stock option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
expense |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Tax effect |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
121,376 |
|
|
$ |
(1,390 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,453 |
) |
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
(2,632 |
) |
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
64,058 |
|
|
$ |
(662 |
) |
|
$ |
(300 |
) |
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
The restatement adjustments reduced previously reported diluted net earnings per share
by $0.02 and $0.00 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
Enacted October 22, 2004, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code significantly changed the
rules for nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Section 409A imposes certain
restrictions and taxes on stock awards that constitute deferred
compensation. Section 409A relates specifically to the personal
tax liabilities of our employees that have received discounted
options. We are currently
reviewing the implications of Section 409A on grants awarded with intrinsic value that vested
after December 31, 2004 and modifications made to existing grants after October 3, 2004 along
with potential remedial actions.
As of December 15, 2006, we have paid direct costs of approximately $6.0 million for costs
associated with the Special Committees investigation and additional related professional
services and consulting fees associated with the restatement effort. We expect to pay up to
several million dollars of additional expense in the next few months associated with the
conclusion of the investigation and restatement of our consolidated financial statements.
Overview
We are a specialty insurance group with offices in the United States, the United Kingdom,
Spain and Bermuda transacting business in more than 50 countries. Our group consists of
insurance companies, underwriting agencies and reinsurance brokers. Our shares are traded on
the New York Stock Exchange and had a market capitalization of $3.3 billion at June 30, 2006.
We earned $168.3 million or $1.44 per diluted share in the first six months of 2006 compared
to $118.7 million or $1.11 per share in the first six months of 2005, and $89.1 million or
$0.76 per share in the second quarter of 2006 compared to $63.4 million or $0.59 per share in
the second quarter of 2005. The 2006 per share amounts include the effect of dilution from a
$150.0 million common stock offering in November 2005. Shareholders equity increased by 24%
from a year ago to $1.8 billion at June 30, 2006, principally from a combination of net
earnings and the 2005 equity offering.
We underwrite a variety of specialty lines of business identified as diversified financial
products; group life, accident and health; aviation; London market account; and other
specialty lines of business. Products in each line are marketed by our insurance companies
and agencies, either through a network of independent agents and brokers or directly to
customers. With the exception of our public company directors and officers liability
business, certain international aviation risks and our London market business, we focus on
lower limit, smaller premium business that is less susceptible to price competition, severity
of loss or catastrophe risk. Our principal insurance companies are rated AA (Very Strong)
by Standard & Poors Corporation and A+ (Superior) by A.M. Best Company, Inc.
We generate our revenue from five primary sources: 1) risk-bearing earned premium produced by
our insurance company operations, 2) non-risk-bearing fee and commission income received by
our underwriting agency and intermediary operations, 3) ceding commissions in excess of
policy acquisition costs earned by our insurance company operations, 4) investment income
earned by all of our operations and 5) other operating income. We produced $959.5 million of
revenue in the first six months of 2006, an increase of 23% over 2005. Net earned premium
increased due to greater retentions, predominantly in our diversified financial products line
of business, organic growth in certain lines of business and from acquisitions. Investment
income increased due to a 34% growth in total investments and an increase in interest rates.
Other operating income increased due to activity in our strategic investments and trading
portfolio.
36
During the past several years, we substantially increased our shareholders equity by
retaining most of our earnings and issuing additional shares of common stock. With this additional equity, we
increased the underwriting capacity of our insurance companies and made strategic
acquisitions, adding new lines of business or expanding those with favorable underwriting
characteristics.
Our 2006 and 2005 acquisitions are listed below. Net earnings and cash flows from each
acquired entity are included in our operations beginning on the effective date of each
transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
Segment |
|
Effective date acquired |
G.B. Kenrick & Associates, Inc.
|
|
Agency
|
|
July 1, 2006 |
Novia Underwriters, Inc.
|
|
Agency
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
Illium Insurance Group
|
|
Agency
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
Perico Ltd.
|
|
Agency
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
Perico Life Insurance Company
|
|
Insurance company
|
|
November 30, 2005 |
HCC International Insurance Company
|
|
Insurance company
|
|
July 1, 2005 |
United States Surety Company
|
|
Insurance company
|
|
March 1, 2005 |
The following section discusses our key operating results. The reasons for any significant
variations between the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are the same as those discussed
below for the respective six month periods, unless otherwise noted. Amounts in the following
tables are in thousands, except for earnings per share, percentages, ratios and number of
employees.
Results of Operations
Net earnings increased 42% to $168.3 million ($1.44 per diluted share) in the first six
months of 2006 from $118.7 million ($1.11 per diluted share) in the same period of 2005. Net
earnings increased 41% to $89.1 million ($0.76 per diluted share) in the second quarter of
2006 from $63.4 million ($0.59 per diluted share) in the second quarter of 2005. Growth in
underwriting profits, net investment income and other operating income contributed to the
increase in 2006 earnings.
The following table sets forth the relationships of certain income statement items as a
percent of total revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
Net earned premium |
|
|
81.7 |
% |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
81.8 |
% |
|
|
83.4 |
% |
Fee and commission income |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Net realized investment gain (loss) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense, net |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
Policy acquisition costs, net |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income tax expense |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue increased 23% to $959.5 million in 2006, driven by significant growth in net
earned premium, investment income and other operating income, which more than offset the
expected decrease in fee and commission income. We expect total revenue to continue to grow
throughout 2006.
37
Gross written premium, net written premium and net earned premium are detailed below. Gross
written premium increased from organic growth in certain lines of business and from acquisitions.
Increased retentions, particularly in our diversified financial products line of business,
contributed to the growth in net written and earned premiums. In addition, following an
increase in our retentions at the renewal of certain reinsurance programs of our aviation
line, a transfer of in force business from reinsurers resulted in increased net written
premium and net earned premium in the second quarter of 2006. See the Insurance Company
Segment section below for further discussion of the changes in premium revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premium |
|
$ |
1,092,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,014,555 |
|
|
$ |
586,054 |
|
|
$ |
539,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premium |
|
|
876,533 |
|
|
|
735,745 |
|
|
|
483,482 |
|
|
|
378,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premium |
|
|
783,891 |
|
|
|
657,843 |
|
|
|
403,320 |
|
|
|
337,726 |
|
Fee and commission income are shown in the table below. Fee and commission income decreased
due to our insurance company subsidiaries ceding less insurance, thereby reducing ceding
commissions earned by them and reinsurance commissions earned by our reinsurance
intermediaries. Partially offsetting this decline was $2.8 million of profit commissions
from reinsurers recognized in the second quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
$ |
45,931 |
|
|
$ |
48,147 |
|
|
$ |
22,870 |
|
|
$ |
26,160 |
|
Insurance companies |
|
|
19,616 |
|
|
|
20,779 |
|
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
11,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and commission income |
|
$ |
65,547 |
|
|
$ |
68,926 |
|
|
$ |
33,878 |
|
|
$ |
37,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sources of net investment income are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
$ |
51,491 |
|
|
$ |
36,162 |
|
|
$ |
27,186 |
|
|
$ |
18,656 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
14,025 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
6,485 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
10,252 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
3,840 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income |
|
|
75,768 |
|
|
|
47,002 |
|
|
|
37,511 |
|
|
|
23,536 |
|
Investment expense |
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
|
|
(1,961 |
) |
|
|
(1,338 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
72,754 |
|
|
$ |
45,041 |
|
|
$ |
36,173 |
|
|
$ |
22,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income increased 62% in the first six months of 2006 and 59% in the second
quarter of 2006, compared to the prior year periods. The increase was primarily due to
higher investment assets, which increased to $3.6 billion at June 30, 2006 compared to $2.7
billion at June 30, 2005 and increasing interest rates. The growth in investment assets
resulted from: 1) higher net earnings, 2) higher retentions, 3) commutations of reinsurance
recoverables in late 2005, 4) our public offering of common stock in 2005 and 5) the increase
in net loss reserves particularly from our diversified financial products line of business,
which generally have a longer time period between occurrence and payment of claims. We
continue to invest our funds primarily in fixed income securities, slightly extending their
duration to 4.9 years at June 30, 2006 from 4.7 years at June 30, 2005 and increasing the
percentage of tax-exempt municipal bonds in our investment portfolio. We expect investment
assets and investment income to continue to increase in 2006.
38
At June 30, 2006, our unrealized loss on fixed income securities was $54.1 million, compared
to an unrealized loss of $8.5 million at December 31, 2005, due to increases in market
interest rates. The change in the unrealized gain or loss, net of the related income tax
effect, is recorded in other comprehensive income and fluctuates with changes in market
interest rates. Our general policy has been to hold our fixed income securities, which are
classified as available for sale, through periods of fluctuating interest rates and to not
realize significant gains or losses from their sale. The unrealized loss on our fixed income
securities declined to $33.0 million at July 31, 2006.
Information about our portfolio of fixed income securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yield |
|
|
4.1% |
|
|
3.9% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average tax equivalent yield |
|
|
5.0% |
|
|
4.8% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Weighted average maturity |
|
8.0 years |
|
7.7 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average duration |
|
4.9 years |
|
4.7 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average yield on our short-term investments increased from 2.6% in 2005 to 3.8% in 2006.
Other operating income increased in 2006 compared to the prior year, primarily due to net
gains from trading securities and a gain from the partial disposition of a strategic
investment. Period to period comparisons of other operating income may vary substantially
depending on market values of trading securities and other financial instruments and on
income from strategic investments or dispositions of such investments. The following table
details the sources of other operating income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Trading securities |
|
$ |
21,854 |
|
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
|
$ |
17,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
Strategic investments |
|
|
12,749 |
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
Financial instruments |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
$ |
38,795 |
|
|
$ |
9,252 |
|
|
$ |
20,045 |
|
|
$ |
5,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense increased 18% and policy acquisition costs increased 25%
over the prior year six-month amounts primarily due to the growth in net earned premium. See
the Insurance Company Segment section below for further discussion of the changes in loss and
loss adjustment expense and policy acquisition costs.
Other operating expense, which includes compensation expense, was flat compared to prior year
periods. The 2006 amounts include stock option expense under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R) and operating expenses of subsidiaries acquired in the
second half of 2005. We had 1,505 employees at June 30, 2006 compared to 1,263 a year
earlier, with the increase due to acquisitions. See the Recent Accounting Changes section
below for further discussion of our adoption of SFAS 123(R) in 2006. The second quarter of
2005 included expense related to an indemnification claim.
Our effective income tax rate was 33.3% for 2006, compared to 33.0% for 2005. We recorded a
special $1.8 million U.S. repatriation tax benefit in the second quarter of 2005. The effect
of the new Texas margin tax was immaterial.
At June 30, 2006, book value per share was $16.45 up from $15.26, total assets were $7.4
billion up from $7.0 billion, and shareholders equity was $1.8 billion up from $1.7 billion,
all compared to December 31, 2005.
39
Segments
Insurance Company Segment
Net earnings of our insurance company segment increased 35% to $129.5 million in the first
six months of 2006 compared to $96.2 million in the same period of 2005. The growth in
segment net earnings was driven by an increase in underwriting income, increased investment
income and the operations of acquired subsidiaries. Even though there is some pricing
competition in certain of our markets, our margins remain at an acceptable level of
profitability due to our underwriting expertise and discipline. We expect net earnings from
our insurance companies to continue to grow during 2006.
Premium
Gross written premium increased 8% to $1.1 billion in the first six months of 2006 compared
to 2005. Net written premium increased 19% to $876.5 million and net earned premium
increased 19% to $783.9 million for the same period. The increase in gross written premium
was due to higher writings in the energy sector of our London market account and in
diversified financial products, partially offset by the non-renewal of a book of accident and
health business that was 100% reinsured. The increases in net written and net earned premium
were primarily due to growth in the energy sector, although our retention percentage on this
line was reduced in 2006 to spread the risk, and higher retention levels on non-catastrophe
business. The overall percentage of retained premium increased to 80% in 2006 from 73% in
2005. Net written and net earned premium are expected to continue to grow in 2006.
The following tables provide premium information by line of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
NWP as |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
written |
|
|
written |
|
|
% of |
|
|
earned |
|
|
|
premium |
|
|
premium |
|
|
GWP |
|
|
premium |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified financial products |
|
$ |
450,733 |
|
|
$ |
373,765 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
$ |
348,319 |
|
Group life, accident and health |
|
|
272,758 |
|
|
|
258,888 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
256,023 |
|
Aviation |
|
|
115,096 |
|
|
|
90,364 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
72,231 |
|
London market account |
|
|
158,165 |
|
|
|
90,517 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
48,865 |
|
Other specialty lines |
|
|
95,123 |
|
|
|
63,093 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
58,536 |
|
Discontinued lines |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
nm |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,092,112 |
|
|
$ |
876,533 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
$ |
783,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified financial products |
|
$ |
423,619 |
|
|
$ |
295,474 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
$ |
228,330 |
|
Group life, accident and health |
|
|
306,292 |
|
|
|
257,009 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
255,602 |
|
Aviation |
|
|
106,356 |
|
|
|
68,282 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
66,809 |
|
London market account |
|
|
91,798 |
|
|
|
65,308 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
57,618 |
|
Other specialty lines |
|
|
83,775 |
|
|
|
48,322 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
44,551 |
|
Discontinued lines |
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,014,555 |
|
|
$ |
735,745 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
NWP as |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
written |
|
|
written |
|
|
% of |
|
|
earned |
|
|
|
premium |
|
|
premium |
|
|
GWP |
|
|
premium |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified financial products |
|
$ |
253,487 |
|
|
$ |
212,120 |
|
|
|
84 |
% |
|
$ |
179,207 |
|
Group life, accident and health |
|
|
138,604 |
|
|
|
129,445 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
128,262 |
|
Aviation |
|
|
58,862 |
|
|
|
54,939 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
39,034 |
|
London market account |
|
|
83,658 |
|
|
|
51,794 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
26,937 |
|
Other specialty lines |
|
|
51,234 |
|
|
|
35,193 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
29,896 |
|
Discontinued lines |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
nm |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
586,054 |
|
|
$ |
483,482 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
403,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified financial products |
|
$ |
224,547 |
|
|
$ |
149,477 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
$ |
121,479 |
|
Group life, accident and health |
|
|
156,210 |
|
|
|
127,560 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
Aviation |
|
|
57,254 |
|
|
|
36,156 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
|
London market account |
|
|
48,602 |
|
|
|
36,396 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
30,907 |
|
Other specialty lines |
|
|
48,256 |
|
|
|
27,248 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
23,326 |
|
Discontinued lines |
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
539,436 |
|
|
$ |
378,393 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm Not meaningful comparison
The changes in premium volume and retention levels between years resulted
principally from the following factors:
|
|
|
Diversified financial products Growth in our surety and credit products was
strong from both organic growth and our 2005 acquisitions. The growth in net
written and net earned premium was due to increased retentions resulting from a
reduction in proportional reinsurance. |
|
|
|
Group life, accident and health Gross written premium declined primarily
because we non-renewed a book of business which was 100% reinsured. Profit
margins remain at acceptable levels despite competition from the fully insured
market. |
|
|
|
Aviation The growth in net written and net earned premium was due to the
effect of recapture of ceded unearned premium from a transfer of in force
business, which increased net written premium by $11.3 million and net earned
premium by $5.6 million in the second quarter of 2006. In addition, retentions
increased from a reduction in proportional reinsurance. |
|
|
|
London market account Gross written premium increased due to the
substantial increase in rates in the energy sector as a result of the 2005
hurricane losses, more than offsetting a reduction in our property sector
premium. Net written premium increased for the same reason and will be reflected
in increases in our net earned premium later in 2006 and into 2007. In 2006, to
increase our capacity and spread our risk in the energy sector, we entered into a
new quota share reinsurance agreement, which resulted in a decrease in our
retention percentage although net written premium has still increased. Although
the cost of our 2006 excess of loss reinsurance increased, our potential
profitability is greater on the increased gross written premium. Our aggregate
exposure in Florida and the Gulf of Mexico is lower in 2006 than it was in 2005. |
|
|
|
Other specialty lines We experienced organic growth in our other specialty
lines of business from increased writings in several products. The mix of
products affected the retention percentages. Rates in this line have been
relatively stable. |
41
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The net deficiency relating to prior year losses included in our net incurred loss and loss
adjustment expense was $0.7 million in the first six months of 2006, compared to a net
deficiency of $2.3 million in the first six months of 2005. We had a net redundancy of $3.3
million in the second quarter of 2006 and a net deficiency of $0.8 million in the second
quarter of 2005. During the second quarter of 2005, we reduced our net loss reserves on the
2004 hurricanes by $5.8 million to reflect revised estimates of our remaining liabilities.
This reduction was offset by reserve increases in our London market account and group life,
accident and health lines of business. Deficiencies and redundancies in reserves occur as a
result of our continuing review and as losses are finally settled or claims exposures change.
We have no material exposure to environmental or asbestos losses and believe we have
provided for all material net incurred losses.
Our gross loss ratio was 55.8% in the first six months of 2006 and 57.5% in the same period
of 2005. The following table provides comparative net loss ratios, by line of business,
which were relatively consistent with the prior year ratios, other than a higher ratio for
aviation in the second quarter of 2005 as a result of worse than expected underwriting
experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
earned |
|
|
loss |
|
|
earned |
|
|
loss |
|
|
earned |
|
|
loss |
|
|
earned |
|
|
loss |
|
|
|
premium |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
premium |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
premium |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
premium |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Diversified
financial products |
|
$ |
348,319 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
$ |
228,330 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
% |
|
$ |
179,207 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
121,479 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Group life, accident
and health |
|
|
256,023 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
255,602 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
128,262 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
126,657 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
Aviation |
|
|
72,231 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
66,809 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
39,034 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
London market account |
|
|
48,865 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
57,618 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
26,937 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
30,907 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
Other specialty lines |
|
|
58,536 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
44,551 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
29,896 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
23,326 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
|
Discontinued lines |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
nm |
|
|
4,933 |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
nm |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
783,891 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
$ |
657,843 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
$ |
403,320 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
% |
|
$ |
337,726 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm Not meaningful comparison
Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, which are net of the related portion of commissions on reinsurance
ceded, increased to $152.8 million in the first six months of 2006 from $122.0 million in the
first six months of 2005. Policy acquisition costs as a percentage of net earned premium
increased to 19.5% in 2006 from 18.5% in 2005 due to changes in the mix of business. The
expense ratio was relatively flat compared to 2005.
42
Agency Segment
Revenue from our agency segment decreased to $86.7 million in the first six months of 2006
from $95.7 million in the first six months of 2005, primarily due to less business produced
in certain lines and the overall effect of ceding less insurance. In addition, we
consolidated two underwriting agencies into insurance companies in 2005 and 2006. As a
result, segment net earnings also decreased in 2006 to $19.6 million from $20.1 million in
2005. While increased retentions result in less fee and commission income to our agency
segment, they generate increased insurance company revenue and net earnings. We expect the
revenue and net earnings of this segment will stabilize in 2006 and begin to increase again
in 2007.
Other Operations Segment
Revenue and net earnings from our other operations segment increased to $38.9 million and
$25.1 million, respectively, in the first six months of 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due
to net gains from trading securities and the partial sale of a strategic investment. Results
of this segment may vary substantially period to period depending on our investment in or
disposition of strategic investments and activity in our trading portfolio.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We receive substantial cash from premiums, reinsurance recoverables, commutations, fee and
commission income, proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments and investment income.
Our principal cash outflows are for the payment of claims and loss adjustment expenses,
premium payments to reinsurers, purchases of investments, debt service, policy acquisition
costs, operating expenses, taxes and dividends.
Cash provided by operating activities can fluctuate due to timing differences in the
collection of premiums and reinsurance recoverables and the payment of losses and premium and
reinsurance balances payable, the completion of commutations and activity in our trading
portfolio. Our cash provided by operating activities has been strong in recent years due to:
1) our increasing net earnings, 2) growth in net written premium and net loss reserves due to
organic growth, acquisitions and increased retentions, 3) commutations of selected
reinsurance agreements and 4) expansion of our diversified financial products line of
business wherein we retain premium longer due to the longer duration of claims liabilities.
The components of our net operating cash flows are detailed in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As restated) |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
168,286 |
|
|
$ |
118,744 |
|
|
$ |
89,144 |
|
|
$ |
63,356 |
|
Change in premium, claims and other
receivables, net of reinsurance, other
payables and restricted cash |
|
|
(50,226 |
) |
|
|
(114,725 |
) |
|
|
(37,213 |
) |
|
|
(63,610 |
) |
Change in unearned premium, net |
|
|
104,214 |
|
|
|
71,397 |
|
|
|
86,062 |
|
|
|
41,021 |
|
Change in loss and loss adjustment
expense payable, net of reinsurance
recoverables |
|
|
113,416 |
|
|
|
105,873 |
|
|
|
77,009 |
|
|
|
56,846 |
|
Change in trading portfolio |
|
|
(84,491 |
) |
|
|
(38,054 |
) |
|
|
(36,497 |
) |
|
|
3,274 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
8,742 |
|
|
|
(24,398 |
) |
|
|
3,345 |
|
|
|
(15,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
259,941 |
|
|
$ |
118,837 |
|
|
$ |
181,850 |
|
|
$ |
84,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Cash provided by operating activities increased $141.1 million in 2006. Cash received from
commutations, included in cash provided by operating activities, totaled $34.5 million in
2005. Cash flow from operations increased in 2006 due to higher net written premium,
combined with slow submission of hurricane-related claims for payment. Cash flow from
operations was unusually low in 2005 due to the timing of receipt of premiums and payment of
payables.
Our combined cash and investment portfolio increased by $280.6 million during 2006 to a total
of $3.6 billion at June 30, 2006. We maintain a substantial level of cash and liquid
short-term investments to meet anticipated payment obligations.
In 2006, we paid $32.3 million, which had been accrued at December 31, 2005, related to
earnout consideration based on the terms of prior acquisition agreements. In June and July
2006, we acquired Novia Underwriters, Inc. and G.B. Kenrick & Associates, Inc. for cash
consideration.
Our $200.0 million Revolving Loan Facility allows us to borrow up to the maximum allowed by
the facility on a revolving basis until the facility expires on November 30, 2009. We had
borrowings of $28.0 million as of June 30, 2006.
In the second quarter of 2006, we filed a Universal Shelf registration statement with the
Securities and
Exchange Commission, which replaced our previously filed registration statements and provides
for the issuance of an aggregate of $1.0 billion of our securities. These securities may be
debt securities, equity securities, trust preferred securities, or a combination thereof.
As a result of our common stock trading at specified price levels in the second quarter of
2006, holders may elect to surrender our 2.00% Convertible Exchange Notes (Notes) in the
third quarter for cash equal to the principal amount of the Notes ($172.4 million at June 30,
2006) and common stock for the value of the conversion premium. We expect to use operating
cash flow and the Revolving Loan Facility to fund any Notes surrendered, which have been
minimal to date. Assuming an average price of $30.00 for our stock, we would issue
approximately 2.3 million shares of common stock should all Note holders elect conversion.
The dilutive effect of these shares is included in the calculation of our diluted earnings
per share in all periods despite the fact that no material conversions have been made and
none are expected at this time. Our common stock must meet the specified price levels in
each subsequent quarter in order for the Notes to be eligible for conversion in the following
quarter. Our 1.30% Convertible Notes are not eligible for conversion in the third quarter.
As a result of our delayed filing of our Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and
September 30, 2006, we are ineligible to register our securities on Form S-3 or use our
previously filed shelf registration statement for sale of our securities by us or resale of
our securities by others until we have timely filed all periodic reports under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for one year. We may use Form S-1 to raise capital and borrow money
utilizing public debt or complete acquisitions of other companies, which could increase
transaction costs and adversely impact our ability to raise capital and borrow money or
complete acquisitions in a timely manner. In addition, the financial strength ratings of our
insurance companies and our debt ratings, which A.M. Best placed under review with negative
implications and Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors affirmed with a stable outlook, if
reduced, might significantly impede our ability to raise capital and borrow money.
On October 30, 2006, we received a registered letter from U.S. Bank, as trustee for the
holders of our 2.00% Convertible Notes due 2021, 1.30% Convertible Notes due 2023 and 2.00%
Convertible Exchange Notes due 2021, stating that U.S. Bank, as trustee, had not received our
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. If we do not file our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 with the SEC and deliver
the report to the trustee within sixty days from the date notice was
received from the trustee,
such failure to file and deliver will be considered an Event of Default under the
indenture governing the notes. If an Event of Default were to occur under the indentures
for any series of the notes, the trustee or holders of at least 25% of the aggregate
principal of such series then outstanding could declare all the unpaid principal on such
series of notes then outstanding to be immediately due and payable. Likewise, we have not
timely delivered our Form 10-Qs for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2006 as
required by the terms of our Revolving Loan Facility agreement. The banks that are a party
to the agreement waived certain Defaults or Events of
44
Default until January 31, 2007. In addition, our restatement of our prior year financial
statements might be considered an Event of Default which has been waived until January 31,
2007. Our failure to comply with the covenants in the indentures for our convertible notes
and our Revolving Loan Facility loan agreement in the future could have a material adverse
effect on our stock price, business and financial condition if we would not have available
funds at that time to repay any defaulted debt. A default and acceleration under the
indentures for our convertible notes and loan agreement may also trigger cross-acceleration
under our other debt instruments.
In
December 2006, our existing Revolving Loan Facility was increased by
$100.0 million to $300.0 million. Pursuant
to the terms of the agreement, the Company can borrow up to $25
million in addition to what is currently borrowed for working capital
purposes. However, the full unfunded amount of the facility would be
available to pay any potential convertible note conversion or put.
Based on the Special Committees voluntary independent investigation of our past practices
related to granting stock options, we determined that the price on the actual measurement
date for a number of our stock option grants during the period 1997 through 2005 and into
2006 did not correspond to the price on the stated grant date and that certain option grants
were retroactively repriced. The investigation was conducted with the help of a law firm
that was not previously involved with our stock option plans and procedures. The SEC has
commenced an informal inquiry. In connection with its inquiry, we received a document
request from the SEC. We intend to fully cooperate with the informal inquiry. We are
unable to predict the outcome of or the future costs related to the informal inquiry.
Our debt to total capital ratio was 15.6% at June 30, 2006 and 15.5% at December 31, 2005.
On August 3, 2006, we reached an agreement to acquire the assets of the Health Products
Division (the Division) of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America for cash
consideration of $140.0 million and to assume the Divisions outstanding loss reserves. The
Divisions operations include medical stop loss insurance for self-insured corporations and
groups; excess insurance for HMOs; provider excess insurance for integrated delivery systems;
excess medical reinsurance to small and regional insurance carriers; and Life Trac, a network
for providing organ and bone marrow transplants. The Division currently writes more than
$300.0 million in annual gross premium. We plan to integrate the Divisions operations into
HCC Life Insurance Company, within our insurance company segment. The transaction is expected
to close in the third quarter of 2006, subject to regulatory approval. We will use our
Revolving Loan Facility to fund a portion of the purchase price. The acquisition was
consummated on October 2, 2006.
We believe that our operating cash flows, investments, Revolving Loan Facility and other
sources of liquidity will provide sufficient sources of liquidity to meet our current
operating needs for the foreseeable future.
Recent Accounting Changes
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, using the
modified prospective method. In 2006 and thereafter, we will expense the fair value of our
unvested stock options granted before January 1, 2006 and all options granted after that
date. Prior to adoption, we accounted for our stock options in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and did not
recognize compensation expense for options granted. Under the modified prospective method of
SFAS 123(R), the 2005 and prior period financial statements were not restated. We made no
modifications to our stock option plans in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
In the first six months of 2006, we expensed $6.1 million ($4.3 million after tax or $0.04
per diluted share) of stock-based compensation, after the effect of the deferral and
amortization of related policy acquisition costs. We expensed $3.4 million ($2.4 million
after tax or $0.02 per diluted share) in the second quarter of 2006. At June 30, 2006, there
was approximately $36.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to
unvested options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of three
years. In 2006, we expect to recognize $12.8 million of expense, including the amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs, related to stock-based compensation for options
currently outstanding. In accordance with the requirements of APB Opinion No. 25 we recorded
$1.4 million and $0.7 million of stock-based compensation expense in the six and three months
ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Effective January 1, 2007, FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertain income tax
positions. We are currently reviewing the requirements of FIN 48 to determine the effect it
will have on our consolidated financial statements.
45
The FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which clarified the
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. SFAS
157 does not require any new fair value measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in
guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 will be effective for us
on January 1, 2008. We are currently assessing whether the adoption of SFAS 157 will have an
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current
Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 establishes a standard approach for quantifying the
materiality of errors to current and prior period financial statements. SAB 108s guidelines
must be applied in the fourth quarter, and adjustments, if any, will be recorded either by
restating prior year financial statements or recording a cumulative effect adjustment as of
January 1, 2006. We believe the requirements of SAB 108 will
have no effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have made no changes in our methods of application of our critical accounting policies
from the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2005.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Background of Restatement
As
disclosed in Explanatory Note Late Filing of Quarterly Report
on page 2 of
this Form 10-Q and in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, in August 2006, our Board
of Directors formed a Special Committee of independent directors to commence an investigation of
our past stock option granting practices for the period 1995 through 2005. On November 17, 2006, we
announced that the Special Committee found that we had used incorrect accounting measurement dates
for stock option grants covering a significant number of employees
and members of our Board of Directors during the period 1997 through
2005 and that certain option grants were retroactively priced. Additionally, at the direction of
the Special Committee, we reviewed our stock option granting practices from 1992, the year of our
initial public stock offering, through 1994 and in 2006 and found incorrect measurement dates due
to retroactive pricing were used in 2006. In substantially all of these instances, the price on
the actual measurement date was higher than the price on the stated grant date.
The Special Committee concluded that mis-priced option grants, the effect of which, together with
certain other adjustments, resulted in a cumulative net decrease in shareholders equity at
December 31, 2005 of $3.3 million, affected all levels of employees. The Special Committee found
that Stephen L. Way, Chief Executive Officer, retroactively priced options, that he should have
known he was granting options in a manner that conflicted with our stock option plans and public
statements, and that this constituted a failure to align the stock option granting process with our
stock option plans and public statements. Although finding his actions were inconsistent with the duties
and obligations of a chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company, the Special Committee
also found that Mr. Ways motivation appeared to be the attraction and retention of talent and to
provide employees with the best option price. The Special Committee also concluded that
Christopher L. Martin, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, was aware that options were
being retroactively priced in a manner inconsistent with applicable plan terms and the procedures
memoranda that he had prepared, that granting in-the-money options had accounting implications, and
that he did not properly document our Compensation Committees informal delegation of authority to
Mr. Way. The Special Committee also found that there was no evidence that Mr. Way or Mr. Martin
intended to falsify the consolidated financial statements.
Before the
Board of Directors reviewed the results of the investigation, the
chairman of our Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from
the Board of Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, the Board of Directors determined that it would
be appropriate to accept the resignations of Mr. Way and Mr. Martin, which both tendered on
November 17, 2006.
We determined that, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations, we should have recorded compensation
expense related to these mis-priced options for the excess of the market price of our stock on the
actual accounting measurement date over the exercise price of the option. As a result, we concluded
that we needed to amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 to
restate our consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
and the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and all quarters for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and to record an adjustment to the condensed
consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006.
In addition, as discussed below, we concluded that we had a material
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2006.
As part of the restatement process, we recorded other adjustments in the period 2000 through 2005
that were not recorded in the originally filed financial statements due to their immateriality. We
evaluated the control deficiencies that resulted in these adjustments and concluded that these
immaterial errors were the result of control deficiencies that did not constitute a material
weakness, individually or in the aggregate, in our internal control over financial reporting.
46
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act)) that are designed to ensure that
required information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required timeframe,
as specified in rules set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our disclosure controls
and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officer (CFO), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As of
June 30, 2006, an evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined
in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us to comply with our
disclosure obligations under the Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported by us within the timeframes specified by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in order to comply with our
disclosure obligations under the Act because of the material weakness
in internal control over financial reporting described below.
Notwithstanding this material weakness, our current management has
concluded that our consolidated financial statements for the periods
covered by and included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and fairly present,
in all material respects, our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for each of the periods presented herein.
Material
Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results
in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected. Our current management identified the following
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as
of June 30, 2006.
We did not maintain an effective control environment based on the criteria established in the
COSO framework. We did not maintain adequate controls to prevent or detect management override
by certain former members of senior management related to our stock option granting
practices and procedures. This lack of an effective control environment
permitted certain former members of senior management to override controls and retroactively
price stock option grants, resulting in ineffective controls over our stock option granting
practices and procedures. Effective controls, including monitoring and adequate communication,
were not maintained to ensure the accuracy, valuation and presentation
of activity related to our stock option granting practices and procedures. This control
deficiency resulted in misstatement of our stock-based compensation expense, additional paid-in
capital and related income tax accounts and related disclosures, and in the restatement of our
consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and the
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and all
quarters for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the adjustment of the condensed
consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006.
This control deficiency could result in misstatement of the aforementioned accounts and
disclosures that would result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has
determined this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last quarter
of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
47
Remediation Plans
We are committed to remediating the material weakness identified above by implementing changes to
our internal control over financial reporting to enhance our control environment. During 2006, we implemented or are in the process
of implementing new policies and controls related to our stock option granting practices and procedures, as follows:
|
|
|
Before the Board of Directors reviewed the results
of the investigation, the Chairman of our Compensation Committee tendered his resignation from the Board of
Directors on November 8, 2006. After reviewing the results of the investigation, our Board of Directors determined that
it would be appropriate to accept the resignations of our former CEO
and General Counsel, which both tendered on November 17, 2006.
Our Board of Directors has appointed a new Chairman of our Compensation Committee and a new
CEO who, together with other members of our senior management, are committed to achieving
transparency through effective corporate governance, a strong control environment,
application of business standards reflected in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and
completeness and integrity of our financial reporting and disclosure. |
|
|
|
|
We have changed our option granting approval policies and procedures to require
Compensation Committee approval of all new option grants on the day of each Compensation
Committee meeting preceding the regularly scheduled quarterly Board of Directors meeting.
All grants will be appropriately approved and documented in minutes of the meeting, taken
contemporaneously with the meeting. All grants will be priced at the market closing price
on the day of each such Compensation Committee meeting. We have established processes and
procedures to increase the level of communication between the Compensation Committee,
senior management and our financial reporting and accounting personnel regarding stock
option grants. |
We are actively engaged in the implementation of other remediation efforts to address the material
weakness identified in our internal control over financial reporting. Although we have not fully
remediated the material weakness as of the date of this Form 10-Q filing, we believe we have made
substantial progress.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As described in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q,
based on the Special Committees voluntary independent investigation of our past practices
related to granting stock options, we determined that the price on the actual measurement
date for a number of our stock option grants during the period 1997 through 2005 and into
2006 did not correspond to the price on the stated grant date and that certain option grants
were retroactively repriced. The investigation was conducted with the help of a law firm
that was not previously involved with our stock option plans and procedures. The SEC has
commenced an informal inquiry. In connection with its inquiry, we received a document
request from the SEC. We intend to fully cooperate with the informal inquiry. We are
unable to predict the outcome of or the future costs related to the informal inquiry.
We are party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that arise in the normal course
of our business. Many of such lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings involve claims
under policies that we underwrite as an insurer or reinsurer, the liabilities for which, we
believe, have been adequately included in our loss reserves. Also, from time to time, we are
a party to lawsuits, arbitrations and other proceedings that relate to disputes over
contractual relationships with third parties, or that involve alleged errors and omissions on
the part of our subsidiaries. We have provided accruals for these items to the extent we
deem the losses probable and reasonably estimable.
In April 2006, we were named as a defendant in a complaint related to insurance marketing and
producer compensation practices. The lawsuit was filed in Federal District Court in Georgia
by a number of corporate plaintiffs against approximately 100 insurance entity defendants.
The suit has been transferred to the multi-district litigation proceeding pending in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated
pre-trial proceedings with suits previously transferred that appear to the court to involve
common questions of fact. The complaint alleges violations of Federal antitrust law, the
Racketeering Influence and Corrupt Organization Act and various state anti-fraud laws. The
lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. We are vigorously contesting this action.
Although the ultimate outcome of the matters cannot be determined at this time, based on
present information, the availability of insurance coverage and advice received from our
outside legal counsel, we believe the resolution of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005.
48
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On May 11, 2006, we held our 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. At such time, the
following item was submitted to a vote of shareholders through the solicitation of proxies.
a. Election of Directors
The following persons were elected to serve on the Board of Directors until the 2007 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The
Directors received the votes next to their respective names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
|
Stephen L. Way
|
|
|
93,071,974 |
|
|
|
8,224,691 |
|
Frank J. Bramanti
|
|
|
96,375,271 |
|
|
|
4,921,394 |
|
Patrick B. Collins
|
|
|
94,897,820 |
|
|
|
6,398,845 |
|
James R. Crane
|
|
|
95,533,654 |
|
|
|
5,763,011 |
|
J. Robert Dickerson
|
|
|
96,030,159 |
|
|
|
5,266,506 |
|
Walter M. Duer
|
|
|
96,181,419 |
|
|
|
5,115,246 |
|
Edward H. Ellis, Jr.
|
|
|
94,941,406 |
|
|
|
6,355,259 |
|
James C. Flagg, Ph.D.
|
|
|
93,567,882 |
|
|
|
7,728,783 |
|
Allan W. Fulkerson
|
|
|
95,952,679 |
|
|
|
5,343,986 |
|
Walter J. Lack
|
|
|
92,937,951 |
|
|
|
8,358,714 |
|
John N. Molbeck, Jr.
|
|
|
95,862,348 |
|
|
|
5,434,317 |
|
Michael A. F. Roberts
|
|
|
92,927,117 |
|
|
|
8,369,548 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
a. Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement effective March 23, 2006, between HCC Insurance
Holdings, Inc. and John N. Molbeck, Jr. |
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement effective April 1, 2006, between HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
and Christopher L. Martin |
10.3
|
|
Master Agreement dated August 3, 2006, by and among Allianz Life Insurance Company of
North America, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York and HCC Life Insurance Company |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer |
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer |
32.1
|
|
Certification with Respect to Quarterly Report |
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2006
|
|
/s/ Frank J. Bramanti |
|
|
|
(Date)
|
|
Frank J. Bramanti, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2006
|
|
/s/ Edward H. Ellis, Jr. |
|
|
|
(Date)
|
|
Edward H. Ellis, Jr., Executive Vice President |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
50
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement effective March 23, 2006, between HCC Insurance
Holdings, Inc. and John N. Molbeck, Jr. |
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement effective April 1, 2006, between HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
and Christopher L. Martin |
10.3
|
|
Master Agreement dated August 3, 2006, by and among Allianz Life Insurance Company of
North America, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York and HCC Life Insurance Company |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer |
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer |
32.1
|
|
Certification with Respect to Quarterly Report |