UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER O-24512
ANZA CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA 88-1273503
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
or organization) Identification No.)
3200 BRISTOL STREET, SUITE 700
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE (714) 866-2100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [_] No [X]
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of
1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a
court. Yes [_] No [_]
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of March 21,2005, there
were 9,496,346 shares of common stock issued and 5,496,346 shares of common
stock outstanding.
1
ANZA CAPITAL, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION...........................................................................
ITEM 1 Financial Statements........................................................................3
ITEM 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.......4
ITEM 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.................................19
ITEM 4 Controls and Procedures....................................................................28
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION.............................................................................28
ITEM 1 Legal Proceedings..........................................................................29
ITEM 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds................................29
ITEM 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities............................................................29
ITEM 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................................29
ITEM 5 Other Information..........................................................................30
ITEM 6 Exhibits...................................................................................30
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). These statements are
based on management's beliefs and assumptions, and on information currently
available to management. Forward-looking statements include the information
concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations set forth under
the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan
of Operation." Forward-looking statements also include statements in which words
such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "estimate,"
"consider" or similar expressions are used.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our future results and shareholder
values may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking
statements. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any
forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3
ANZA CAPITAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
January 31, 2005 April 30, 2004
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,244,834 $ 2,204,525
Commissions receivable 607,046 2,028,232
Loans held for sale, net 2,294,700 3,650,911
Marketable securities 1,190,000 --
Prepaids and other current assets 38,374 19,898
Total current assets $ 6,374,954 $ 7,903,566
Property and equipment, net 189,356 244,152
Other assets 78,046 121,744
Total assets $ 6,642,356 $ 8,269,462
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Notes Payable $ 259,900 $ --
Accounts payable 205,037 215,151
Commissions payable 1,970,453 2,919,264
Unsecured bank line of credit 75,000 --
Warehouse line of credit 2,252,982 3,606,866
Accrued liabilities 503,610 980,465
Dividends Payable 108,887
Other current liabilities 531,025 74,535
Total liabilities $ 5,906,894 $ 7,796,281
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary $ 298,230 --
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, 2,500,000 shares authorized:
Class D convertible preferred stock, no par value;
liquidation value of $126.81 per share; 15,000
shares authorized; 8,201.5 shares outstanding 1,040,222 1,040,222
Class F convertible preferred stock, no par value; liquidation
value of $16.675 per share; 25,000 shares authorized, 18,800
shares issued and outstanding 313,490 313,490
Class G convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
liquidation value of $5.00 per share; 750,000 shares
authorized, 500,000 shares issued and outstanding 1,000,000 --
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 4,869,096 shares issued and outstanding as of
January 31, 2005 and April 30, 2004 4,870 4,870
Additional paid in capital 14,289,292 13,650,274
Accumulated deficit (16,210,642)) (14,535,675))
Total stockholders' equity $ 437,232 $ 473,181
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 6,642,356 $ 8,269,462
See accompanying notes
4
ANZA CAPITAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
------------------------------ ------------------------------
January 31, January 31, January 31, January 31,
2005 2004 2005 2004
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Revenues:
Broker commissions $ 11,002,585 $ 12,431,253 $ 36,344,559 $ 46,858,850
Sale of Loans, Net (113,980) 97,897 166,107 208,516
Notary and other 186,531 171,194 593,198 1,638,754
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
11,075,136 12,700,344 37,103,864 48,706,120
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Cost of revenues:
Broker commissions 7,389,173 8,094,274 24,957,215 32,359,506
Notary and other 152,302 136,499 525,904 1,015,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
7,541,475 8,230,773 25,483,119 33,374,506
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Gross profit 3,533,661 4,469,571 11,620,745 15,331,614
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Operating expenses:
General and administrative 2,384,927 2,203,282 7,309,749 7,061,770
Salaries and wages 1,357,670 2,525,064 4,889,945 8,168,243
Selling and marketing 242,343 91,448 1,143,559 304,507
Management fees (interco) -- -- -- --
Impairment of Goodwill -- 195,247 -- 195,247
Provision for litigation losses (91,480) -- (91,480) --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
3,893,460 5,015,041 13,251,773 15,729,767
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Operating income (loss) (359,799) (545,470) (1,631,028) (398,153)
Interest expense (121,990) (37,004) (236,923) (336,261)
Interest income 42,080 61,556 162,582 359,700
Other Income 5,053 -- 5,053 --
Discount on Notes Payable (7,768) -- (7,768) --
Minority Interest on Income(Loss) 58,205 -- 58,205 --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ (384,219) $ (520,918) $ (1,649,879) $ (374,714)
============ ============ ============ ============
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Weighted average number of 4,869,896 4,829,960 4,869,896 4,829,960
common shares
Net income (loss) per common $ (0.08) $ (0.11) $ ( 0.34) $ (0.08)
share
See accompanying notes
5
ANZA CAPITAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine Months Nine Months
Ended Ended
January 31, 2005 January 31, 2004
---------------- ----------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $(1,649,879) $ (374,714)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 53,696 38,055
Consulting expense 900,000 --
Non-cash BCF and interest charges 30,938 --
Gunn Allen warrants consulting 39,427 --
Change in minority interest (58,205) --
Impairment of Goodwill -- 195,247
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: -- --
Decrease in commissions and accounts receivable 1,421,186 882,935
Decrease in loans held for sale, net 1,356,211 5,675,143
Decrease in prepaids and other current assets 25,222 4,151
Decrease in accounts payable (10,115) (252,523)
Increase (Decrease) in commissions payable (948,811) 546,850
Increase (Decrease) in accrued and other liabilities (101,478) 401,297
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by operating activities 1,058,192 7,116,441
----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of property and equipment -- (125,800)
Net issuance of secured note receivable -- (180,000)
Other assets, net 1,100 (41,031)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 1,100 (346,831)
----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Advances (borrowings) from warehouse line of credit, net (1,353,883) (5,612,542)
Repayments on convertible notes payable (25,000) --
Proceeds from convertible notes payable 125,000 --
Issuance of convertible debentures 8% 100,000 --
Issuance of convertible debentures 10% 55,000 --
Borrowings from unsecured line of credit 75,000 --
Loans Payable 4,900
Repurchase of Series E Preferred Stock -- (67,685)
Dividends on Series E Preferred Stock -- (15,103)
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (1,018,983) (5,695,330)
----------- -----------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 40,309 1,074,280
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,204,525 2,755,659
----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,244,834 $ 3,829,939
=========== ===========
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary $ 356,435 $ --
=========== ===========
Conversion of Class C Preferred Stock to common $ 122,950
=========== ===========
Securities exchange agreement $ 1,000,000 $ --
=========== ===========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest $ 115,932 $ 324,448
=========== ===========
Income taxes were not significant during the periods presented
See accompanying notes
6
NOTES TO INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial data as of January 31, 2005 is unaudited; however, in the
opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company's
consolidated financial position as of January 31, 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the three and nine months ended January 31,
2005 and 2004. The results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
operations, which may result for the year ending April 30, 2005. Also, in the
opinion of management, all disclosures required on Form 10-Q were fully
furnished.
ANZA is a holding company with three active subsidiaries. All intercompany
transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended April
30, 2004 should be read in connection with this quarterly report.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes.
These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported income or loss
NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN
In connection with the audit of the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended April 30, 2004, the Company received a report from its independent
auditors that included an explanatory paragraph describing uncertainty as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, which contemplated that assets
and liabilities would be settled at amounts in the normal course of business.
ANZA incurred a loss from operations during the year ended April 30, 2004 and
had an accumulated deficit as of April 30, 2004. In addition, AMRES is a
defendant in a significant amount of litigation for which the outcome is
uncertain. In some cases, management believes losses are covered by insurance.
ANZA's industry in recent years has experienced increased competition. In
addition, interest rates have increased during the past 12 months, having a
slowing effect on the industry. Management's immediate plans are to reduce
spending through management level pay decreases and the management of expenses.
Management is also hopeful that the AMRES mortgage banking division will expand;
however, for the mortgage banking division to continue operating, AMRES needs to
comply with its line of credit covenants, which are currently in compliance. If
ANZA continues to experience losses, management will require additional working
capital through debt or equity sources. At present, although Anza has completed
a transaction to improve its net worth, it has no other commitments for
long-term financing. There are no assurances that management will be successful
in its plans. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
For the nine months ended January 31, 2005 eight investors accounted for eighty
percent of the purchase of loans held for sale and accounted for eighty percent
of the revenues from mortgage banking and brokering business, and for the nine
months ended January 31, 2004, three investors accounted for eighty percent of
the purchases of loans held for sale and accounted for eighty percent of the
revenues from the mortgage banking and brokering business.
7
NOTE 4. SEGMENT DISCLOSURE
Segments were determined based on services provided by each segment. Performance
of the segments is evaluated on net income. For the three and nine months ended
January 31, 2005 and 2004, Management has provided the following information
with respect to its operating segments (in thousands).
Three Months Ended January 31, 2005
Operating
Revenues Income Assets
-------- ------ ------
2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004
Loan Brokering - Corporate 11,002 12,431 (306) 15 1,308 5,726
Mortgage Banking (114) 98 (45) (131) 2,416 1,927
Notary Services 0 78 0 (207) 0 35
Real Estate Brokerage 187 93 (3) (12) 5 4
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
11,075 12,700 (354) (335) 3,729 7,692
======= ======= ======= ------- ------- -------
Corporate (30) (186) 2,913 607
------- ------- ------- -------
Total (384) (521) 6,642 8,299
------- ------- ------- -------
Nine Months Ended January 31, 2005
Operating
Revenues Income Assets
-------- ------ ------
2005 2004 2005 2004 2005 2004
Loan Brokering - Corporate 36,345 46,859 (693) 326 1,308 5,726
Mortgage Banking 166 209 26 (213) 2,416 1,927
Notary Services 0 1,223 0 127 0 35
Real Estate Brokerage 593 415 (1) (1) 5 4
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
37,104 48,706 (668) 239 3,729 7,692
======= ======= ======= ======= ------- -------
Corporate (981) (614) 2,913 607
------- ------- ------- -------
Total (1,649) (375) 6,642 8,299
------- ------- ------- -------
8
NOTE 5. IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STATEMENTS
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment ("SFAS 123R"). SFAS
123R requires companies to expense the value of employee stock options and
similar awards. SFAS 123R is effective for interim and annual financial
statements beginning after June 15, 2005 and will apply to all outstanding and
unvested share-based payments at the time of adoption. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact SFAS 123R will have on its consolidated financial
statements and will adopt such standard as required.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary
Assets," an amendment to Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions". SFAS No. 153 eliminates certain differences in the guidance in
Opinion No. 29 as compared to the guidance contained in standards issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board. The amendment to Opinion No. 29
eliminates the fair value exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Such an exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in
periods beginning after December 16, 2004. Management does not expect adoption
of SFAS No. 153 to have a material impact, if any, on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152, "Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions". The FASB issued this statement as a result of the
guidance provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, "Accounting for
Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions". SOP 04-2 applies to all real estate
time-sharing transactions. Among other items, the SOP provides guidance on the
recording of credit losses and the treatment of selling costs, but does not
change the revenue recognition guidance in SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate", for real estate time-sharing transactions. SFAS No. 152 amends
Statement No. 66 to reference the guidance provided in SOP 04-2. SFAS No. 152
also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects", to state that SOP 04-2 provides the relevant guidance on
accounting for incidental operations and costs related to the sale of real
estate time-sharing transactions. SFAS No. 152 is effective for years beginning
after June 15, 2005, with restatements of previously issued financial statements
prohibited. Management does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 152 to have a
material impact, if any, on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,"Inventory Costs". SFAS No. 151
amends the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) under the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing". Paragraph 5 of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, previously
stated that ". . . under some circumstances, items such as idle facility
expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so
abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. . . ." This
statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges
regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal." In addition,
this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management does not expect adoption
of SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact, if any, on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.
9
NOTE 6. LOANS HELD FOR SALE
Loans held for sale consist of conventional uninsured mortgages originated by
the Company, with various interest rates. Details of the loans are as follows:
January 31, 2005 April 30, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Unaudited)
Number of Total Loan Average Number of Total Loan Average
Loans Range Loans Amount Interest Rate Loans Amount Interest Rate
----------- ----- ------ ------------- ----- ------ -------------
$20,000 to $100,000 2 131,000 9.23% 14 720,375 8.69%
$100,001 to $200,000 6 855,657 5.74% 2 312,000 7.00%
$200,001 to $300,000 1 205,538 6.50% 4 1,129,350 6.19%
$300,001 to $400,000 1 322,605 1.00% 1 360,500 5.50%
Over $400,000 1 779,900 1.00% 1 1,158,250 13.87%
-------------------------- ------------------------
11 $2,294,700 22 $3,680,475
Deferred Fees, net of cost
(24,300) (29,564)
------------------- ----------------
$2,270,400 $3,650,911
=================== ================
NOTE 7. UNSECURED LINE OF CREDIT
The Company maintains a $75,000 unsecured line of credit. The line of credit is
personally guaranteed by ANZA's chief executive officer. The interest rate is
adjustable, based upon a published prime rate, plus an additional 7.75%. As of
January 31, 2005, the Company had $75,000 outstanding related to this line of
credit.
NOTE 8. WAREHOUSE LINE OF CREDIT
The Company maintains a $10,000,000 warehouse line of credit which expires on
May 31, 2005. The agreement is personally guaranteed by ANZA's chief executive
officer. The credit agreement calls for various ratios and net worth
requirements, minimum utilization requirements, and limits the warehouse period
to 45 days for any specific loan. The interest rate is adjustable, based upon a
published prime rate, plus an additional 1% to 3% and is payable monthly. The
rate varies depending on the type of loan (conforming or non-conforming) with
higher rates on non-conforming loans. The line of credit is collateralized by
the Company's loans held for sale. As of January 31, 2005, the Company is in
compliance with all of the loan covenants related to the warehouse line of
credit.
10
NOTE 9. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
January 31, 2005 April 30, 2004
(unaudited)
Accrued salary and benefits $313,693 $161,610
Accrued loss contingencies 169,383 633,500
Accrued professional fees -- 61,558
Accrued other liabilities 2,271 108,887
Accrued interest 18,263 14,910
-------- --------
503,610 980,465
Accrued dividends 108,887
--------
$612,497 $980,465
======== ========
During the quarter ended January 31, 2005, the Chief Executive Officer elected
to defer a portion of his salary. As of January 31, 2005, the total amount
deferred was $69,000. This amount is reflected as accrued salary and benefits on
the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 10. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
ANZA presents basic earnings per share (EPS) and diluted EPS on the face of all
statements of operations. Basic EPS is computed as net income (loss) divided by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable
through stock options, warrants, and other convertible securities. Dilutive
securities including the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, the Series F
Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series G Convertible Preferred Stock were
not included in the computations of loss per share for the period ended January
31, 2005 since their effects are anti-dilutive.
NOTE 11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
From time to time, the Company's board of directors authorizes the issuance of
common stock. The Company values shares of common stock based on the closing ask
price of the securities on the date the directors approve such issuance. In the
event the Company issues common stock subject to transferability restrictions
under Rule 144 of the Exchange Act of 1933, the Company discounts the closing
ask prices by 10% to value its common stock transactions. No such issuances
occurred for either period presented; however, our subsidiaries issued shares as
discussed in Note 12 Stock Registration of Subsidiary.
NOTE 12. STOCK REGISTRATION OF SUBSIDIARY
On October 18, 2004, the Company's subsidiary, American Residential Funding,
Inc. ("AMRES") filed Form D with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a
listing on the Pink Sheets. In connection with the filing, the Company issued
15,000,000 shares of common stock to consultants as advisors to facilitate the
transaction and concurrently sold 3,000,000 shares at $0.01 per share
(representing a total of 17.5% of AMRES's common shares outstanding). In
December 2004, the shares began trading at $0.05 per share. Therefore, the
Company has valued the shares issued to the consultants and the concurrent
nominal investments at $0.05 per share, resulting in expense of approximately
$900,000.
11
Additionally, the Company initially recorded the pro-rata share of AMRES'equity
owned by the minority interest of $356,435 as minority interest in consolidated
subsidiary. Based on the company's pro rata allocation of AMRES net loss for the
quarter, the company recorded an adjustment to minority interest in the amount
of $58,204.
As of January 31, 2005, the subsidiary is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, of which 500,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock are outstanding and held by the Company, and 1,000,000 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock are outstanding and held by the Company. As a result
of the conversion provisions of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the
Company has a minimum of 80% of the votes on all issues submitted to the
subsidiary shareholders, and can acquire upon conversion shares of common stock
representing a minimum of 80% of the outstanding common stock.
NOTE 13. SECURITIES EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
On September 17, 2004, the Company entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement
(the "Agreement") and Escrow Agreement with an unrelated party (the "Party").
Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company exchanged 500,000 shares of its
newly created Series G Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series G") and warrants
to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock for 1,000,000 shares
of common stock of Cash Technologies, Inc. ("TQ Shares"), a publicly traded
company.
The initial value of the TQ Shares was approximately $1,320,000 at the inception
of the Agreement. The Company is required to make certain adjustments as follows
to the value of the TQ Shares:
Within 10 business days of the end of each calendar quarter, beginning with the
quarter ended December 31, 2004 (each, a "Supplemental TQ Share Valuation
Date"), the escrow agent will update the value of the TQ Shares held in escrow
by multiplying the average closing price for the 30 days before the end of the
applicable quarters times the number of TQ Shares then held in escrow, and then
adding the value of any cash or other assets (valued in the same manner as the
TQ Shares, or otherwise at their fair market value) then held in escrow (the
"Supplemental TQ Shares Value").
If the Supplemental TQ Shares Value exceeds $1,000,000, then either (i) upon the
receipt of a written request from the Party, that number of TQ Shares may be
released from escrow to the Party so that the Supplemental TQ Share Value is
approximately $1,000,000, or (ii) upon the mutual consent of the Company and the
Party, the Company will issue additional shares of the Series G equal to the
then-Supplemental TQ Share Value. In the event that any of the TQ Shares have
been previously released from escrow, and the Supplemental TQ Share Value is
subsequently less than $1,000,000, upon the receipt of a written request from
the Company, the Party will re-deposit that number of TQ Shares (up to the
original 1,000,000 TQ Shares), or cash or other assets acceptable to the
Company, with the escrow agent so that the Supplemental TQ Share Value is
approximately $1,000,000.
If the Supplemental TQ Share Value is less than $1,000,000, and all of the TQ
Shares are already held in escrow, then upon the receipt of a written request
from the Company, that number of the Series G will be released from escrow to
the Company so that the original issue price of the Series G then held in escrow
will be approximately equal to the Supplemental TQ Share Value. If, on a
subsequent Supplemental TQ Share Valuation Date, the Supplemental TQ Share Value
exceeds $1,000,000, then the Company will have the choice of re-depositing any
withdrawn Series G to bring the Supplemental TQ Share Value back to $1,000,000,
or adjusting the number of TQ Shares as set forth above.
12
The Company has recorded the fair market value of the TQ Shares as
available-for-sale securities in the accompanying balance sheet, with
fluctuations in the value being recorded as a current liability in the
accompanying financial statements. As of January 31, 2005, the fair market value
of the TQ shares is approximately $1,190,000. This is offset by a corresponding
liability of $190,000 reflected in other current liabilities on the accompanying
financial statements.
Additionally, the Agreement has certain rescission rights as follows:
Upon the receipt of notice by the Party of any claim or demand, not currently
known to them, that is reasonably likely to have an effect on the warehouse line
of credit, the TQ Shares, and/or the Series G then held in escrow, or if the
Company fails to make a dividend payment on the Series G within 10 days of its
due date, or if there is a change in control of the Company, then the Party may
rescind the Agreement. Upon rescission of this Agreement, the escrow agent will
return any TQ Shares (or other assets) held in escrow to the Party, and any
Series G held in escrow to the Company.
The Company may rescind this Agreement at any time after the date which is 6
months after the Closing Date (the "Exclusion Period") by providing 30 days
advance written notice to the Party (the "Anza Termination Notice Period").
However, if the Company rescinds the Agreement during the 30-day period
immediately following the Exclusion Period, the Company is limited to rescinding
the transaction only with respect to one-half of the then-outstanding Series G.
The Exclusion Period and the Anza Termination Notice Period is waived for the
Company if the Party exercises a conversion of the Series G. After the
expiration of the Anza Termination Notice Period (if applicable), the escrow
agent will return any TQ Shares held in escrow to the Party, and any Series G
held in escrow to the Company.
The Agreement calls for the various parties to deposit their consideration with
an escrow agent, until such a time as either (i) all of the Series G are
converted into shares of the Company's common stock, or (ii) the escrow is
terminated in accordance with the Agreement, as noted above. In either case, the
warrants are transferred to the Party within two days from depositing in the
escrow.
The Series G, par value $0.001 per share, with original issue price of $2.00 per
share, have non-cumulative dividends at 12% per annum, payable when declared.
The Series G are immediately convertible into shares of the Company's common
stock, subject to certain adjustments, at a price equal to the lesser of $0.08
per share or 80% of the 30-day average closing bid price for the 30 trading days
prior to the date the Company receives a conversion notice. All outstanding
shares of the Series G are automatically converted into the Company's common
stock on September 17, 2009, 5 years after the original issue date.
The warrants to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock
have an exercise price of $0.10 per share and expire in 5 years. In relation to
this transaction, a beneficial conversion feature charge of $225,821 was
assessed for the issuance of the Series G, and a warrant valuation was assessed
at $96,716. The pro-rata charges applicable to the quarter ended January 31,
2005 were $17,550 related to the beneficial conversion feature and $7,538
related to amortization of the warrants.
13
On October 30, 2004, the Escrow Agreement was amended such that upon termination
of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the TQ Shares will be released to the
Company and the Series G will be released to the Party.
Consulting Agreement and Warrant Agreements
The Company previously entered into an Advisory Agreement with a consultant
dated November 25, 2003 and executed an Addendum to that agreement dated
September 3, 2004. On September 15, 2004, the Company issued to the consultant
warrants to acquire a total of 250,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share
and 200,000 shares of common stock at $0.10 shares. Both warrants are
exercisable for five years. In connection herewith, the company recognized
$39,427 in consulting expense which is reflected in general and administrative
expenses on the accompanying financial statements.
NOTE 14. CONTINGENCIES
Indemnifications
On December 9, 2002, the Company received notification from HUD requesting
indemnification on up to 23 loans brokered by a former loan officer of the
Company. AMRES executed and provided an indemnification agreement to HUD, as
requested. On February 13, 2003, HUD notified AMRES that (i) without the loans
originated by this particular loan officer, AMRES' default and claim rate would
be an acceptable level to HUD, and (ii) as a result of the termination of that
loan officer, and the execution of the indemnification agreement, the matter was
closed.
During the year ended April 30, 2004, the Company received two demands for
payment from HUD on claims totaling approximately $170,000. The first demand
involved losses on five properties and the second demand involved losses on an
additional property. All six properties were part of the original 23 properties
referred to above. The Company carries errors and omissions insurance coverage,
however, the Company received notification from their errors and omissions
insurance carrier that their claim for coverage was denied. As a result of this
denial, the Company estimated that their total liability under the
indemnification agreement is approximately $200,000.
To date, the company received demands for payments in the approximate amount of
$197,000 and has paid all of the outstanding balance except for $60,000 for
which the company is requesting a credit for from HUD. The $60,000 represents a
surplus that HUD received on the sale of two of the indemnified properties.
StateAudits
The Company is subject to certain state audits, which are typical in this
industry. Often these audits uncover instances of non-compliance with various
state licensing requirements. These instances of non-compliance may also
translate into a particular state levying a fine or penalty against the Company.
The only pending audit at the time of the Company's last quarterly update was by
the State of Georgia which led to no material findings against the Company.
14
At the present time, the Company is not aware of any pending actions by any
state licensing agency.
Settlements
Oaktree Litigation
In March 2003, the Company was served with a lawsuit brought by Oaktree Funding
Corporation ("Oaktree") against nineteen defendants, including the Company, the
appraiser, escrow company, notary public, and borrowers involved in six (6)
different loan transactions brokered by the Company and funded by Oaktree. The
Complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendants committed fraud,
breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, RICO violations, and unfair
business practices. The Complaint requested damages in excess of $1,500,000 plus
attorneys' fees, interest, penalties, and punitive damages.
As of April 30, 2003, the Company recorded a provision of $140,000 related to
the belief of the Company and of legal counsel that this was the maximum
exposure attributable to this lawsuit.
On June 14, 2004, the matter settled in mediation for a total potential exposure
to the Company of $46,500. Of this amount, the Company agreed to pay $31,500 up
front and indemnify Oaktree for up to an additional $15,000 on three additional
properties.
To date, no claims have been made on the three additional properties.
In November 2003, a former employee filed a lawsuit against the Company, Anza
Capital, its Chief Executive Officer and American Residential Funding, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Complaint alleged breach of contract
and fraud arising out of the plaintiff's employment with the Company, and
requested damages in excess of $5,000,000, plus attorneys' fees, interest,
penalties, and punitive damages. The trial date had been continued until
December 6, 2004, but the matter was settled at mediation, which took place on
November 24, 2004. By the terms of the settlement agreement, the amount of the
settlement is confidential but the terms were favorable and resulted in no
material impact to the Company.
On June 1, 2004, the Company agreed to settle a claim by a lender who sought
recovery on two loans involving alleged misrepresentation by the borrowers. The
claims were for amounts of approximately $200,000. The Company executed a
settlement agreement for a total amount of $120,000, with an initial payment of
$60,000 and subsequent monthly payments of $10,000 for six months. The $120,000
is accrued in the financial statements as of April 30, 2004. During the quarter
the Company paid the $60,000 and began making the monthly payments. As of the
date of this disclosure, the Company has paid this obligation in full.
A lender requested that the Company reimburse them for two loans in which went
into default and were subsequently sold for a $150,000 loss. The loans were
brokered by branch of the Company. On July 19, 2004, the Company settled with
the lender agreeing to make monthly payments on the amount of $10,000 starting
August 1, 2004 until a total of $138,000 is paid. The Company accrued the
$138,000 and is included in the financials as of January 31, 2005
In October 2003, a former employee filed a lawsuit against the Company, Anza
Capital, its Chief Executive Officer and American Residential Funding, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Complaint alleged breach of contract
and fraud arising out of the plaintiff's employment with the Company, and
requested damages in excess of $2,000,000, plus attorneys' fees, interest,
penalties, and punitive damages. The trial date was continued until March 2005.
The Company believed the case lacked merit and defended vigorously, however, the
matter was settled at mediation, which took place on February 17, 2005. By the
terms of the settlement agreement, the amount of the settlement is confidential
but the terms were favorable and resulted in no material impact to the Company.
15
On or about July 3, 2003 The Company filed a complaint against a former branch
manager and filed an Amended Complaint on or about October 16, 2003. The
allegations included breach of written contract; intentional and negligent
misrepresentation; misappropriation of trade secrets; interference with economic
relations; violation of Business & Professions Code 17200; breach of implied
covenant of good faith and fair dealing; conversion and conspiracy. Recently,
the defendant filed a cross-complaint against the company alleging that the
company misclassified her employment status and that the company was liable for
money advanced on its behalf, approximately $250,000. The Company vigorously
defended the cross-complaint and believed the cross-complaint lacked merit,
however, the entire matter was settled on or about March 4, 2005. The terms of
the settlement are confidential but were very favorable and resulted in no
material impact to the Company.
Active Litigation
On December 11, 2003, a competitor of the Company filed a suit alleging
intentional interference with contract, conversion and trade name infringement,
among other causes of action. The Company vehemently denies any wrongdoing and
is vigorously defending these claims. The trial date has been continued until
August 8, 2005
On January 23, 2004, a former employee filed claim against the Company in the
Superior Court of California, for the County of Orange. The Complaint alleged
breach of oral contract and complaint for damages arising out of the plaintiff's
employment with the Company, and requested damages in excess of $50,000 plus
attorney's fees, interest, penalties and punitive damages. The Company believes
this case lacks merit and is defending vigorously. The Court recently granted
the Company's Motion for Summary Judgment except for one cause of action.
Plaintiff is considering an appeal.
On November 6, 2003, a borrower filed claim against the Company in the Superior
Court of California, City and County of Alameda. The defendants alleged in the
complaint are Dae Won & Associates, Inc., Dae W. Yoon, the Company, and Kathy
Pan a loan officer of the Company. Our San Francisco Branch Office employs Ms.
Pan. The complaint alleges fraudulent inducement of contract, rescission,
conversion and negligence. This claim is for a total amount of $121,000. Ms. Pan
vehemently denies any liability and/or responsibility to the plaintiff and has
hired an attorney to respond to the complaint on her behalf. The Company is
defending the matter vigorously, as the Company believes that this case lacks
merit.
In May of 2004 a borrower filed suit against the Company, a branch manager and
an individual, for allegations of fraud amongst other causes of action. The suit
alleges that an individual named Paul Robertson deceived the borrowers who were
seeking a construction loan to build a house on a vacant lot. The plaintiffs
claim that they never received the house or the funds to construct the house and
are seeking "compensatory damages exceeding $75,000" and "punitive damages
exceeding $75,000". The plaintiffs are also seeking "reasonable attorneys' fees
and costs. The Company is defending on the grounds that Robertson was not their
agent and to the extent that he and the agent were somehow defrauding borrowers,
it was being done outside of the course and scope of any agency relationship
with the Company. The Company believes that the case lacks merit and is
defending vigorously.
16
On or about May 18, 2004, a former assistant in one of the Company's branches
filed a complaint. The Complaint alleges violations of Labor Code sections 202
and 203, claiming that plaintiff is owed back commissions. The company believes
that the claim lacks merit and is vigorously defending the matter.
In June 2004 a lawsuit was filed against the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary
American Residential Funding, Inc. ("AMRES") by the Orange County, California
landlord. The suit alleges that AMRES breached a building lease and claims
damages for the entire term of the lease through August 2007 of $886,332. AMRES
recently filed an Answer to the Complaint and a Cross-Complaint against a former
Branch Manager and his business associate who signed the lease in question
purporting to be officers of the corporation. The Company believes that this
matter lacks merit and is defending vigorously to hold the proper parties
accountable for any damages that are due the plaintiff. Recently the Company
obtained information and believes that the office leases, which are the subject
of this litigation have been re-leased to new tenants. Thus, the overall
exposure, in terms of the plaintiff's damages, should be substantially reduced.
On or about July 30, 2004 a complaint was filed by a borrower of the Company.
The Complaint alleges the Violation of Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Breach
of Contract; Intentional infliction of emotional distress. The Company believes
that there are third parties that, at the very least, share in the liability to
the plaintiff and is vigorously seeking to show same through the formal
discovery process.
On or about September 7, 2004 a complaint was filed against the company and its
CEO, alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation and a promise made without
intent to perform The amount of damages claimed is approximately $250,000.
Defendants believe that the matter lacks merit. On Friday, March 11, 2005, the
Court sustained (without leave to amend) Defendants' Demurrer to plaintiff's
amended complaint. Plaintiff is considering an appeal; however, defendants are
making a motion to the Court to recover all of its attorneys' fees and costs for
having to defend this frivolous action.
On or about September 20, 2004, a Class Action complaint was filed, alleging
unsolicited advertisements to fax machines in violation of TCPA 47USC section
227. Damages not disclosed. The company has tendered the matter to People's Home
Loans for indemnification, as they were responsible for the actions that are
subject to the Complaint. Furthermore, the Company believes that the matter
lacks merit and is defending vigorously.
On or about November 10, 2004 a complaint was filed against the Company alleging
breach of contract and warranty; deceptive trade practices; fraud; conversion;
negligence; breach of fiduciary duty; unjust enrichment and conspiracy. The
complaint alleges damages in the approximate amount of $295,000. The Company is
still investigating the merits of the case and attempting to determine the
potential liability and damages. The plaintiff has expressed an interest in
mediating the matter to a resolution.
17
On or about November 24, 2004, a Class Action case was filed against the
Company, one of its former Branch Managers, and a third party entity, Spectrum
Funding Group, Inc., which is operated by said former Branch Manager. The
Complaint alleges damages & equitable relief for violations of the California
Labor Codes; and the California Unfair Business Practices Act. The matter was
tendered to the former Branch Manager for indemnification based on his contract
with the Company. The Company believes that the matter lacks merit and is
defending vigorously.
On or about December 15, 2004, a former loan officer filed a complaint against
the Company, alleging Breach of Contract and Conversion. The Company believes
that the matter lacks merit and is defending vigorously.
The Company is subject to a limited number of claims and actions, which arise in
the ordinary course of business. The litigation process is inherently uncertain,
and it is possible that the resolution of the Company's existing and future
litigation may adversely affect the Company's financial position, results of
operations and cash flows.
NOTE 15. ISSUANCE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTE AND WARRANT AGREEMENT BY SUBSIDIARY
On January 7, 2005 and again on January 18, 2005, the company issued convertible
notes to private investors totaling $155,000. The company received proceeds, net
of all costs and fees, in the amount of $133,980. The January 7, 2005 note, with
face amount of $100,000 has a maturity date of June 15, 2005 and has an 8%
interest rate, while the January 18, 2005 note has a maturity date of June 15,
2005 at a 10% interest rate. Both notes are convertible into shares of the
company's subsidiary, AMRES. Both notes have a beneficial conversion feature
which is being amortized over the life of the note and is reflected as interest
expense. The interest expense associated with the beneficial conversion feature
was not considered material for the period ended January 31, 2005.
On January 11, 2004, American Residential Funding, Inc. borrowed $125,000 from
AMRES Holding, LLC, a related party partially owned and controlled by our Chief
Executive Officer. American Residential Funding, Inc. issued a secured
convertible note which accrues interest at 12% per annum and is convertible into
the Company's common stock at 75% of the average closing bid price for the five
days before conversion. Interest payments are due quarterly beginning on January
1, 2005. As additional consideration, the Company issued a warrant to AMRES
Holding, LLC to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.10
per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time between the closing date and a
date which is five years from the closing date.
During the quarter, the company repaid $25,000 of the original $125,000
borrowed. As of January 31, 2005, $100,000 remains outstanding.
NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Partial Conversion of Convertible Note
On February 15, 2005, the holder of the January 7, 2005 convertible note elected
to convert $25,000 of the note balance into 1,000,000 shares of the company's
subsidiary's stock (ARFG.PK). The balance remaining on the convertible note
after conversion is $75,000.
Issuance of Convertible Notes
On February 28, 2005, the company issued two convertible notes for face amount
of $28,000, with a maturity of February 10, 2006 at an 8% interest rate. These
notes are convertible into shares of the company's subsidiary AMRES (ARFG.PK)
and contain a beneficial conversion feature. On March 1, 2005, the holders of
these notes exercised their conversion option to effectuate a partial conversion
in the amount of $2,500 into 250,000 shares of the company's subsidiary AMRES
(ARFG.PK)
18
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
This Form 10-Q report may contain forward-looking statements which involve risks
and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements regarding future events and the Company's plans and expectations.
The Company's actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed
in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those
discussed in the Company's Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2004 and
this report. The Company expressly disclaims any obligations or undertaking to
release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements
contained herein to reflect any change in the Company's expectations or any
events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
OVERVIEW
We are a holding company that currently operates primarily through three
(3) active subsidiaries.
o AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL FUNDING, INC., a Nevada Corporation (AMRES)
provides home financing through loan brokerage and banking.
o BRAVO REALTY.COM, a Nevada Corporation (BRAVO), is a real estate
sales company focused solely in California. Bravo has had limited
operations over the last two years.
o AMRES DIRECT, INC., formerly Red Carpet Holdings, Inc., was recently
activated to focus on direct-to-consumer marketing. The Company has
not generated revenue and has incurred minimal expenses.
Inactive Subsidiaries
o EXPIDOC.COM, a California Corporation (EXPIDOC) arranges for
notaries to provide document signing services for lenders across the
country.
Effective January 31, 2004, we suspended operations at Expidoc. This
decision was a result of a sudden shift in customer mix, as
Expidoc's largest customer (Ditech.com) ceased using Expidoc as a
third party provider of notary services. This event may have a
significant impact on our profitability in future periods as Expidoc
contributed in-excess of $301,558 net profit during the first three
fiscal quarters of the prior year. We are still assessing our
options to proceed with Expidoc, however, we determined that the
remaining goodwill related to our acquisition of Expidoc was
impaired, and thus recorded an impairment charge in the amount of
$175,247 during January of 2004. If we are unable to operate Expidoc
in future periods at similar revenue levels, we will become even
more dependant on AMRES to generate revenue and profits.
o TITUS REAL ESTATE LLC, a California limited liability company (TITUS
REAL ESTATE) and BRAVO REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. (BRAVO REAL ESTATE
NETWORK) are currently non-operational.
As shown below, AMRES has consistently provided the majority of our
consolidated revenue. The industry in which AMRES operates can be highly
volatile and is largely dependent on interest rates.
19
Percentage of Total Revenues by Service
% YTD Revenue % YTD Revenue
January 31, 2005 January 31, 2004
---------------- ----------------
Loan Brokering 99.35% 97.88%
Mortgage Banking (1.03)% .77%
Notary Services 0.0% .61%
Real Estate Brokerage 1.68% .73%
Total 100% 100%
The Mortgage Banking Association expects a decline in refinancing to $434
billion in 2004 versus $2.19 trillion in 2003. Brokerage activities are greatly
influenced by changes in interest rates and comprise substantially all of the
revenues of AMRES. As rates appear to have bottomed in late June 2003, AMRES has
seen a significant drop in loan applications for refinancing compared to prior
periods. Refinancing currently accounts for about 40% of our total loan
production. This, coupled with seasonal declines, is the primary reason for our
revenue declines in recent quarters compared to prior periods.
Traditionally, we have experienced increases in our business during the
spring and summer when home sales are at their highest levels. Loan production
in our highest month of July 2003 totaled 1,394 loans. Loan production has
dropped to an average of 600 loans per month as of January 31, 2005.
If we are unable to generate additional sources of revenue, our quarterly
results will continue to fluctuate and it may be difficult for us to sustain
profitable operations. AMRES is establishing various business initiatives to
reduce its reliance on the refinancing market. These initiatives include:
o Expanding its mortgage banking operations, with emphasis on
sub-prime lending, as there is a higher level of profitability
delivered from banking these loans compared to brokering these
loans. This initiative includes establishing a wholesale operation,
which would allow AMRES to fund loans brokered by other companies.
o Building strategic alliances with other business models such as loan
lead generators, builders, realtors and trade associations.
o Promoting more direct-to-consumer lending, through marketing, with
products that are less sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates,
such as home equity loans, construction loans and sub-prime loans.
Areas we will explore for expansion include Loancomp.com, Loan.com,
maxrelo.com, builder business, Lending Tree and joint ventures with
other sources of loans such as debt counselors, realtor associations
and affinity groups.
o Continuing to solicit new branches to join our network, especially
those branch operations that are "purchase-home sensitive."
o Reducing operating costs through efficiencies generated by new
software and operating systems.
20
We have experienced a slow-down in business during the last quarter, and
had to reduce staff and have cut avoidable costs significantly. As we continue
to experience a significant slow down in the refinance business, and if we are
unsuccessful in the business initiatives described above to expand our sources
of revenue, we are prepared to take immediate actions to reduce our cost
structure. If our total loan volume continues to decline, we will need fewer
personnel to carry out the functions needed to support the loan process.
Specifically, we would further reduce headcount in such areas as compliance,
accounting and marketing. We are prepared to reduce our operating expenses by as
much as 25%, if conditions warrant.
In addition, we will continually monitor our branch performance, closing
under-producing branches to help control our expenses. If implemented, these
measures should offset any potential decline in revenues from loans brokered.
However, should we experience significant and rapid declines in loan volume; it
is unlikely that our cost containment measures will be able to completely offset
the impact of the potential lost revenue.
The AMRES mortgage banking platform, which will allow the transformation
from predominately a mortgage broker to a banker, is currently closing
approximately $7,000,000 loans monthly, versus over $170,000,000 in brokered
loans monthly for AMRES as a whole. This increase in banking, if managed
properly, could allow profitable operations at lower levels of volume. AMRES
mortgage banking currently has a staff of 6, and is expanding as quickly as loan
volume permits, and as quality control and additional experienced employees
allow. It is anticipated that monthly loan production could increase to
$30,000,000 in four to six months, when seasonal revenues are higher. AMRES
mortgage banking has established relationships with several investors to
purchase our funded loans, including IndyMac Bank, Countrywide Funding, and
others. AMRES has purchased software (DataTrac) to manage the mortgage banking
process, as well as software to provide our branches with automated underwriting
(LoanScore).
We have slowed down the number of new branch additions due to an increase
in quality standards, minimum volume requirements, and State preferences. Our
branch count is currently approximately 110, down from approximately 200 at
January 31, 2004. We continue to monitor all of our branches for "probation" and
possible termination to continually ensure that we are focusing our resources on
the most productive branches. AMRES has been fortunate to lure loan production
officers from our competitors. As the mortgage industry contracts, AMRES will
attempt to attract additional branches, production and staff from other firms in
the industry. While our net worth does not allow any major acquisition efforts,
we have made various contacts in our industry soliciting referrals of new
business.
AMRES recently established a corporate managed "direct to consumer" loan
production division (AMRES DIRECT). The corporate loan officers and processors
are purchasing internet leads from proven providers such as Lending Tree.com.
This division will attempt to generate loans directly from consumers through
various marketing initiatives and association with strategic affinity groups,
such as financial planners. This division is still in the early stages of its
development and it is too early to predict our likelihood of success in
increasing our loan production through this division.
We expect we may incur additional expenses from State compliance audits,
loans brokered with recourse back to AMRES, and unpaid branch liabilities. While
we believe we have set aside adequate reserves for these issues, there are no
guarantees, due to the very high volume of past loans.
21
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Anza's consolidated financial statements and related public financial
information are based on the application of accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). GAAP requires the use of
estimates, assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting
principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense
amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information
contained in the external disclosures of Anza, including information regarding
contingencies, risk and financial condition. Anza believes its use of estimates
and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and
conservatively applied. Valuations based on estimates are reviewed for
reasonableness and conservatism on a consistent basis throughout Anza. Primary
areas where financial information of Anza is subject to the use of estimates,
assumptions and the application of judgment include accounts receivable
allowances, and losses on loans held for sale and indemnifications associated
with loans brokered. In addition, we are subject to litigation in the normal
course of business. We assess the probability and financial exposure when
determining when a liability for losses should be recorded. These significant
estimates also include our evaluation of impairments of intangible assets (see
further discussion below). In addition, the recoverability of deferred tax
assets must be assessed as to whether these assets are likely to be recovered by
Anza through future operations. We base our estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant
estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Commissions generated from brokering loans are recognized at the date of
close. Loan origination fees and other fees are deferred net of costs upon the
sale of loans to third parties without recourse, and whereby ANZA has no
continuing involvement.
Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale represent mortgage loans originated and held
by AMRES, pending sale, to interim and permanent investors. AMRES sells loans it
originates, typically within 30 days of origination, rather than hold them for
investment. AMRES sells loans to institutional loan buyers under an existing
contract. AMRES sells the servicing rights to its loans at the time it sells
those loans. At the time a loan is sold, AMRES has no continuing interest since
servicing rights are transferred at the time of sale in accordance with
paragraph 5 of SFAS 140 "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities". Recourse provisions generally relate
to first payment defaults, or breach of representations and warranties, or
fraud, with respect to the loans sold. The recourse provision, because of its
very brief term (30 days), is not practical to value in accordance with
paragraph 6 of SFAS 140, since the value is minimal. In the event AMRES
management becomes aware of a default, the financial asset and liability are
reinstated and an assessment of the impact of losses is made.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and
liabilities. We review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish
a valuation allowance based upon historical losses, projected future taxable
income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences. During the year 2004 and 2003, we estimated the allowance on net
deferred tax assets to be one hundred percent (100%) of the net deferred tax
assets.
22
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005 COMPARED TO
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004
Introduction
Interest rates have continued to put downward pressure on revenues. Our
cost containment measures have been unable to fully offset the impact of our
reduced revenues.
Quarter Ended Quarter Ended
January 31, 2005 January 31, 2004 Dollar Change % Change
---------------- ---------------- ------------- ------------
Revenues $ 11,075,136 $ 12,700,344 $ (1,625,208) (12.8%)
Gross Profit % 31.9% 35.1% N/A (3.2%)
General and Administrative 2,384,927 2,203,282 181,645 8.0%
Salaries and Wages 1,357,670 2,525,064 (1,167,394) (46.2%)
Net Income (Loss) $ (384,219) $ (520,918) (136,699) (26.2%)
Revenues
Revenues decreased by $1,625,208 or 12.8% for the quarter ended January
31, 2005 compared to the quarter ended January 31, 2004. The decrease in
revenues is directly related to the decline in the refinance market and the
discontinued operations of Expidoc.Com.
Bravorealty.com continues to generate only modest revenue and is operating
at near break even. Management continues to evaluate the business model for our
real estate services. Without a significant shift in the model and potential
additional capital outlay, Bravorealty is not expected to provide significant
revenue or profitability in future periods.
Costs of Revenues
Commissions are paid on loans funded. Commissions decreased by $705,101 or
8.7%, for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, to $7,389,173 from $8,094,274 for
the quarter ended January 31, 2004. These decreases are directly related to the
decrease in revenue between the periods.
Consolidated gross profit decreased by $935,910, or 20.9% for the quarter
ended January 31, 2005 to $3,533,661 from $4,469,571 for the quarter ended
January 31, 2004. As a percentage of revenue, the gross profit decreased by
approximately 3.2%. The decrease in the gross profit as a percentage of revenue
is directly related to the reduced fees paid by the branches. The branch fees
were reduced to be competitive. Furthermore, the corporate loan officers were
paid on a higher percentage, increasing the cost of revenue and reducing gross
profit.
23
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses totaled $2,384,927 for the quarter
ended January 31, 2005, compared to $2,203,282 for the quarter ended January 31,
2004. This increase of $181,645 can be directly attributed to AMRES hiring
additional consultants to generate more business and to assist in the stock
registration transaction of AMRES. The Company does not expect to incur
significant cash or non-cash charges to consultants in future periods.
Salaries and Wages
Salaries and wages totaled $1,357,670 in quarter ended January 31, 2005,
compared to $2,525,064 for the quarter ended January 31, 2004. The decrease of
$1,167,394 is directly related to the reduction of personnel as one of the
cost-cutting measures of AMRES.
Selling and Marketing Expense
Selling and marketing expense relates primarily to costs incurred for
prospecting activities to obtain new clients (borrowers). These costs include
acquiring "leads" which translate into funded loans. Selling and marketing
expenses for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 amounted to $242,343 compared to
$91,448 in the prior period. We may see increased spending in this area in
future periods as the marketplace for qualified borrowers becomes more and more
competitive.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $121,990 as of January 31, 2005, compared to $37,004
as of January 31, 2004. Interest expense is primarily related to interest paid
on our warehouse line of credit and interest on our convertible notes payable.
The increase in interest expense is directly related to higher average balances
on our warehouse line of credit and to issuance of new convertible notes. As of
January 31, 2005, the balance on our warehouse line of credit was $2,252,982
compared to $1,901,667 as January 31, 2004.
Income Taxes
Our income taxes have not been material during the periods presented
because of utilization of Anza's net operating loss carryforwards for federal
income tax reporting purposes. California suspended net operating losses usage
for fiscal 2003 and 2004. In 2003, we deducted losses associated with the
LoanNet transactions, as we sold our rights to the shares originally issued for
the exchange transaction in February 2000. The loss deduction amounted to
approximately $2.1 million. No deferred tax asset was previously recorded for
this loss deduction. The Company has no significant current or deferred income
tax expense during the periods presented.
Net Income
ANZA realized a net loss of $384,219 for the quarter ended January 31,
2005 compared to a net loss of $520,918 for the quarter ended January 31, 2004.
This was due to the significant drop in production attributed to the decline in
the refinance market. In prior quarter, impairment of goodwill related to
Expidoc accounted for $195,247 of the loss incurred. There were no such
impairments in the current quarter.
24
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005 COMPARED TO THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2004
Introduction
Interest rates have continued to put downward pressure on revenues. Our
cost containment measures have been unable to fully offset the impact of our
reduced revenues.
Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended
January 31, 2005 January 31, 2004 Dollar Change % Change
---------------- ---------------- ------------- -----------
Revenues $ 37,103,864 $ 48,706,120 $(11,602,256) (23.8%)
Gross Profit % 31.3% 31.5% N/A (.2%)
General and Administrative 7,309,749 7,061,770 247,979 3.5%
Salaries and Wages 4,889,945 8,168,243 (3,278,298) (40.1%)
Net Income (Loss) $ (1,649,879) $ (374,714) 1,275,165 340.3%
Revenues
Revenues decreased by $11,602,256 or 23.8% for the nine months ended
January 31, 2005 compared to the nine months ended January 31, 2004. The
decrease in revenues is directly related to the decline in the refinance market
and the discontinued operations of Expidoc.Com.
Bravorealty.com continues to generate only modest revenue and is operating
at near break even. Management continues to evaluate the business model for our
real estate services. Without a significant shift in the model and potential
additional capital outlay, Bravorealty is not expected to provide significant
revenue or profitability in future periods.
Costs of Revenues
Commissions are paid on loans funded. Commissions decreased by $7,402,291
or 22.9%, for the nine months ended January 31, 2005, to $24,957,215 from
$32,359,506 for the nine months ended January 31, 2004. Notary and other costs
associated with Expidoc.com and Bravorealty.com decreased by $489,096, or 48.2%.
These decreases are directly related to the decrease in revenue between the
periods, mainly due to the slow down in the refinance market and the ceasing of
operations at Expidoc.
Consolidated gross profit decreased by $3,710,869, or 24.2% for the nine
months ended January 31, 2005 to $11,620,745 from $15,331,614 for the nine
months ended January 31, 2004. As a percentage of revenue, the gross profit
decreased by approximately .2%. The decrease in the gross profit as a percentage
of revenue is directly related to the reduced revenue as AMRES pays a reduced
commission percentage once certain revenue targets are met. Typically, certain
corporate branch loan officers receive a higher percentage of the total revenues
until certain targets are met at which time AMRES earns a greater percentage.
25
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses totaled $7,309,749 for the nine months ended
January 31, 2005, compared to $7,061,770 for the nine months ended January 31,
2004. This increase of $247,979 or 3.5% can be directly attributed to AMRES
hiring additional consultants to generate more business and to assist in the
stock registration transaction of AMRES. The stock registration transaction
alone generated a non-cash charge of $900,000 based on the value of AMRES shares
issued to consultants. This non cash consulting expenses were somewhat offset by
AMRES having fewer branches in the current period incurring rent, office
supplies, telephone, utilities and other general and administrative expenses.
Salaries and Wages
Salaries and wages totaled $4,889,945 in nine months ended January 31,
2005, compared to $8,168,243 for the nine months ended January 31, 2004. The
decrease of $3,278,298 is directly related to the reduction of personnel as one
of the cost-cutting measures of AMRES.
Selling and Marketing Expense
Selling and marketing expense relates primarily to costs incurred for
prospecting activities to obtain new clients (borrowers). These costs include
acquiring "leads" which translate into funded loans. Selling and marketing
expenses for the nine months ended January 31, 2005 amounted to $1,143,559
compared to $304,507 in the prior period. We may see increased spending in this
area in future periods as the marketplace for qualified borrowers becomes more
and more competitive.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $236,923 as of January 31, 2005, compared to $336,261
as of January 31, 2004. Interest expense is primarily related to interest paid
on our warehouse line of credit. The decrease in interest expense is directly
related to smaller average balances on the company's warehouse line of credit
during the current period compared to prior year.
Income Taxes
Our income taxes have not been material during the periods presented
because of utilization of Anza's net operating loss carryforwards for federal
income tax reporting purposes. California suspended net operating losses usage
for fiscal 2003 and 2004. In 2003, we deducted losses associated with the
LoanNet transactions, as we sold our rights to the shares originally issued for
the exchange transaction in February 2000. The loss deduction amounted to
approximately $2.1 million. No deferred tax asset was previously recorded for
this loss deduction. The Company has no significant current or deferred income
tax expense during the periods presented.
Net Income
ANZA realized a net loss of ($1,649,879) for the nine months ended January
31, 2005 compared to net loss of $(374,714) for the nine months ended January
31, 2004. This was due to the significant drop in production attributed to the
decline in the refinance market and to significant non-cash charges related to
the issuance of stock to consultants as part of the stock registration
transaction of AMRES.
26
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Introduction
Our cash position remains strong with over $2.2 million on hand as of
January 31, 2005. Our current assets exceed our current liabilities by $468,060.
However, if our revenues continue to decline and we are unable to offset the
declines by shedding overhead costs, our cash balances will decrease noticeably.
In addition, any significant changes to our estimates of exposure from
contingent liabilities could have a severe adverse effect on our liquidity and
capital resources
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,058,192 for the nine
months ended January 31, 2005, compared to net cash provided by operating
activities of $7,116,441 for the prior period. For the nine months ended January
31, 2005, we recorded a net loss of $1,649,879 compared to a net loss of
$374,714 for the nine months ended January 31, 2004. In both periods, changes in
our loans held for sale was the primary contributor to the net cash provided by
operating activities. In the current period we had a decrease in our loans held
for sale amounting to $1,385,775 while the prior period we had a decrease in our
loans held for sale in the amount $5,675,143. In addition, for the current nine
months, we recorded a charge in the amount of $900,000 related to common stock
of AMRES issued to consultants.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $1,100 for the nine months
ended January 31, 2005 compared to cash used in investing activities of $346,831
for the nine months ended January 31, 2004.
Net cash used in financing activities was $1,018,983 for the nine months
ended January 31, 2005, compared to net cash used in financing activities of
$5,695,330 for the nine months ended January 31, 2004. The most significant
contributor to the cash used in or provided by financing activities during both
periods relates primarily to changes on our warehouse line of credit. Advances
from the warehouse line of credit decreased by $1,353,883 for the current nine
month period compared to repayments of $5,612,542 for nine month the prior
period.
Liquidity
Our cash on hand at January 31, 2004 amounted to $2,244,834 and our
working capital was $468,060. Our current obligations consist primarily of
liabilities generated in the ordinary course of business, which includes our
warehouse line of credit. We have no long-term debt which we need to service in
the near term.
We maintain a warehouse line of credit in the amount of $10,000,000.
Maintaining an adequate warehouse line of credit is critical to our growth plans
for our mortgage banking operations. Any significant reduction in the borrowing
limits or significant changes in terms could have a negative impact on our
ability to expand the mortgage banking operations at the pace and with the
degree of profitability we desire. Further, we have traditionally experienced no
defaults on loans funded through our mortgage banking operations. As we continue
to grow this segment of our business, our default rate on these loans may
increase. Any significant change in our default rate would have a negative
impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
27
Interest Rates
We are vulnerable to increases in interest rates. Our business has
declined in the past nine months due to increasing interest rates. The sub-prime
lending market is less vulnerable to increases in interest rates, because
interest rates charges to these borrowers is significantly higher and less
volatile to changes in interest rates. Significant increases in interest rates
could have an adverse impact on our the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
Seasonality
We experience slow loan production in the months of January through March
because of the low number of applications we receive in December and January
relative to the other months during the year. We historically have incurred
losses during the months of February and March because of seasonality.
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate movements significantly impact our volume of closed loans
and represent the primary component of market risk to us. In a higher interest
rate environment, consumer demand for mortgage loans, particularly refinancing
of existing mortgages, declines. Interest rate movements affect the interest
income earned on loans held for sale, interest expense on the warehouse lines
payable, the value of mortgage loans held for sale and ultimately the gain on
sale of mortgage loans.
Our primary financial instruments are cash in banks and money market
instruments. We do not believe that these instruments are subject to material
potential near-term losses in future earnings from reasonably possible near-term
changes in market rates or prices. We do not have derivative financial
instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We are not currently exposed to
any material currency exchange risk.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (or
those persons performing similar functions), after evaluating the effectiveness
of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this Quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"), have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure the timely
collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to the Company
that would potentially be subject to disclosure under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the
Evaluation Date.
28
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
New Matters
In November 2004, a lawsuit was filed against American Residential
Funding, Inc. by First American Title Insurance in the State of Arkansas, County
of Saline, case number CV-2004-875-1. The Complaint alleges breach of contract
and warranty, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and conspiracy, and
requests damages of $294,700, plus accrued interest. We have not filed our
Answer, but intend to vigorously defend the action as we believe it lacks merit.
Former Employees
In October 2003, a lawsuit was filed against the Company, its wholly-owned
subsidiary American Residential Funding, and its Chairman and CEO Vince Rinehart
by a former employee Leigh Dimarco in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Orange, case number 03CC12686. The Complaint alleges
breach of contract and fraud arising our of the plaintiff's employment with the
Company, and requests damages in excess of $2,000,000, plus attorneys' fees,
interest, penalties, and punitive damages. In February 2005, we settled this
case matter with Ms. Dimarco for an amount that is required to remain
confidential.
Existing Matters
Other than as set forth herein, there are no changes to our description of
the existing matters in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 31, 2004.
In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in
various pending or threatened legal actions. The litigation process is
inherently uncertain and it is possible that the resolution of such matters
might have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition and/or results
of operations. The aggregate amount of all claims from the various other legal
proceedings pending against us is not expected to exceed $400,000. In the
opinion of our management, other than as set forth herein, matters currently
pending or threatened against us are not expected to have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 2 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There have been no events which are required to be reported under this
Item.
ITEM 3 DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
There have been no events which are required to be reported under this
Item.
ITEM 4 SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
We held our 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 8, 2004, in
Las Vegas, Nevada. There were individuals representing 4,222,231 votes present
at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, which represented over 50% of the
8,278,878 total outstanding votes of the Company, so a quorum was present. At
the meeting the shareholders approved the following agenda items as set forth in
our Schedule 14C Information Statement on file with the SEC:
29
1. The election of one (1) director, namely Vincent Rinehart, to serve
until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and thereafter until a successor
is elected and qualified. Mr. Rinehart was a director prior to the meeting. The
results of the voting were as follows:
------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------
Votes Votes Broker
Director Votes For Against Withheld Abstentions Non-Votes
------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------
Vincent Rinehart 4,222,231 -0- -0- -0- -0-
------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------
2. The ratification of the appointment of Singer Lewak Greenbaum &
Goldstein LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending April 30,
2005. The results of the voting were as follows:
----------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ----------------
Votes Votes Broker
Votes For Against Withheld Abstentions Non-Votes
----------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ----------------
4,222,231 -0- -0- -0- -0-
----------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- ----------------
A more detailed description of each agenda item at the 2004 Annual
Shareholders Meeting can be found in our Schedule 14C Information Statement
dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 8, 2004.
ITEM 5 OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no events which are required to be reported under this
Item.
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
3.1 (1) Restated Articles of Incorporation, as filed with the
Nevada Secretary of State on April 14, 2003.
3.2 (1) Second Restated Bylaws of Anza Capital, Inc.
4.1 (1) Certificate of Designation for Series D Convertible
Preferred Stock
4.2 (1) Certificate of Designation for Series E Convertible
Preferred Stock
4.3 (1) Certificate of Designation for Series F Convertible
Preferred Stock
4.4 (2) Certificate of Designation of Series G Convertible
Preferred Stock
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Executive Officer
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Financial Officer
30
32.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18
USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18
USC, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(1) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
April 21, 2003 and filed with the Commission on April 22, 2003.
(2) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
and filed with the Commission on September 20, 2004.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On November 12, 2004, we filed an Item 8.01 Current Report on Form 8-K
regarding the results of our annual shareholders meeting held on November 8,
2004.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 21, 2005 /s/ Vincent Rinehart
-----------------------------------
By: Vincent Rinehart
Its: President, Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Chief
Accounting Officer, and Director
32