P.O. Box 1387 • Warsaw, Indiana 46581 • (574) 267-6144

 

 

March 16, 2009

 

 

Dear Shareholder:

 

 

On behalf of the board of directors and management of Lakeland Financial Corporation, we cordially invite you to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of Lakeland Financial Corporation to be held at 12:00 p.m. on April 14, 2009, at Westminster Hall located at 109 9^th Street in Winona Lake, Indiana. The accompanying notice of annual meeting of shareholders and proxy statement discuss the business to be conducted at the meeting. We have also enclosed a copy of our 2008 summary annual report to shareholders and a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for your review. At the meeting we will review our performance in 2008 and update you on our strategic plan as we move forward.

 

          Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has nominated two persons to serve as directors, each of whom is an incumbent director. Additionally, our Audit Committee has selected, and we recommend that you ratify the selection of, Crowe Horwath LLP to continue as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. Finally, we have included a non-binding advisory proposal on the compensation of our executive management. We recommend you vote your shares for the director nominees ,in favor of the ratification of our accountants and in favor of the executive compensation.

 

We encourage you to attend the meeting in person. Please return the enclosed RSVP card if you plan to attend. However, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please take the time to vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card or by following the telephone or Internet voting procedures described on the proxy card. This will assure that your shares are represented at the meeting.

 

We look forward with pleasure to seeing and visiting with you at the meeting.

 

 

 

 

 

P.O. Box 1387 • Warsaw, Indiana 46581 • (574) 267-6144

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD APRIL 14, 2009

 

To the shareholders:

 

The annual meeting of the shareholders of Lakeland Financial Corporation will be held on Tuesday, April 14, 2009, at 12:00 p.m. at Westminster Hall located at 109 9^th Street in Winona Lake, Indiana, for the following purposes:

 

 

 

 

 

Only shareholders of record on our books at the close of business on February 25, 2009, the record date for the annual meeting, will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. In the event there are an insufficient number of votes for a quorum or to approve or ratify any of the foregoing proposals at the time of the annual meeting, the meeting may be adjourned or postponed in order to permit us to further solicit proxies.

 

 

Warsaw, Indiana

March 16, 2009

 

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON, PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO VOTE BY COMPLETING AND MAILING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD OR BY FOLLOWING THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET VOTING PROCEDURES DESCRIBED ON THE PROXY CARD. WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING, AND IF YOU DO YOU MAY VOTE YOUR STOCK IN PERSON IF YOU WISH. YOU MAY REVOKE THE PROXY CARD AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE.

 

THE ENCLOSED PROXY STATEMENT IS AVAILABLE AT WWW.LAKECITYBANK.COM.

 

LAKELAND FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

April 14, 2009  

 

Lakeland Financial Corporation, an Indiana corporation, with its principal executive offices located in Warsaw, Indiana, is the holding company for Lake City Bank. We also own all of the common securities of Lakeland Statutory Trust II, a Connecticut business trust created for the issuance of trust preferred securities. Lake City Bank owns all of the common stock of LCB Investments II, Inc. (a subsidiary formed in 2006), formed to manage a portion of the Bank’s securities portfolio. LCB Investments II, Inc. owns all of the common stock of LCB Funding, Inc. (a subsidiary formed in 2006), a real estate investment trust.

 

This proxy statement is being furnished to shareholders in connection with the solicitation by our board of directors of proxies to be used at the annual meeting to be held at Westminster Hall, located at 109 9^th Street in Winona Lake, Indiana on Tuesday, April 14, 2009 at 12:00 p.m., or at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. Our summary annual report to shareholders, including the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and a copy of our Form 10-K that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, accompanies this proxy statement, which is first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 16, 2009. This proxy statement is also available on the Internet at www.lakecitybank.com.

 

The following is information regarding the meeting and the voting process, presented in a question and answer format.

Why am I receiving this proxy statement and proxy card?

You are receiving a proxy statement and proxy card from us because on February 25, 2009, the record date for the annual meeting, you owned shares of Lakeland Financial’s common stock. This proxy statement describes the matters that will be presented for consideration by the shareholders at the annual meeting. It also gives you information concerning the matters to assist you in making an informed decision.

When you sign the enclosed proxy card or otherwise vote pursuant to the instructions set forth on the proxy card, you appoint the proxy holder as your representative at the meeting. The proxy holder will vote your shares as you have instructed in the proxy card, thereby ensuring that your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the meeting. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, you should instruct the proxies how to vote your shares in advance of the meeting just in case your plans change.

If you have signed and returned the proxy card and an issue comes up for a vote at the meeting that is not identified on the card, the proxy holder will vote your shares, pursuant to your proxy, in accordance with his or her judgment.

What matters will be voted on at the meeting?

You are being asked to vote on the election of two directors of Lakeland Financial for a term expiring in 2012, the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal year and on a non-binding, advisory proposal on the compensation of certain executive officers. These matters are more fully described in this proxy statement.

How do I vote?

After reviewing this document, submit your proxy using any of the proxy delivery or voting methods indicated on the proxy card. By submitting your proxy, you authorize the individuals named in it to represent you and vote your shares at the special meeting in accordance with your instructions. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please submit your proxy promptly in the enclosed envelope or vote telephonically or through the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card.

 

 

If you sign and return your proxy card but do not mark the card to provide voting instructions, the shares represented by your proxy card will be voted “for” all three nominees named in this proxy statement, “for” the ratification of the appointment of our auditors, and “for” the non-binding, advisory proposal on compensation of certain executive officers.

If you are a beneficial owner and a broker or other fiduciary is the record holder (or in what is usually referred to as “street name”), then you received this proxy statement from the record holder. The record holder should have given you instructions for directing how the record holder should vote your shares. It will then be the record holder’s responsibility to vote your shares for you in the manner you direct.

If you want to vote in person, please come to the meeting. We will distribute written ballots to anyone who wants to vote at the meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held in the name of a broker or other fiduciary, you will need to arrange to obtain a proxy from the record holder in order to vote in person at the meeting. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, you should complete and return your proxy card in advance of the annual meeting in case your plans change.

If I hold shares in the name of a broker, who votes my shares?

Under the rules of various national and regional securities exchanges, brokers and other fiduciaries may generally vote on routine matters, such as the election of directors and the ratification of independent registered public accounting firm, but cannot vote on non-routine matters, such as an amendment to the certificate of incorporation or the adoption of a equity incentive plan, unless they have received voting instructions from the person for whom they are holding shares. You should do this by carefully following the instructions your broker gives you concerning its procedures. What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

 

It means that you have multiple holdings reflected in our stock transfer records and/or in accounts with stockbrokers. Please sign and return ALL proxy cards to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

What if I change my mind after I return my proxy card?

 

If you hold your shares in your own name, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the meeting. You may do this by:

 

American Stock Transfer and Trust Company

59 Maiden Lane

New York, New York 10038;

If you hold your shares in the name of your broker and desire to revoke your proxy, you will need to contact your broker to revoke your proxy.

How many votes do we need to hold the annual meeting?

A majority of the shares that are outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business.

Shares are counted as present at the meeting if the shareholder either:

On February 25, 2009, the record date, there were 12,414,130 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Therefore, at least 6,207,066 shares need to be present at the annual meeting.

What happens if a nominee is unable to stand for re-election?

The board may, by resolution, provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee. In the latter case, shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee. Proxies cannot be voted for more than three nominees. We have no reason to believe any nominee will be unable to stand for re-election.

What options do I have in voting on each of the proposals?

You may vote “for” or “withhold authority to vote for” each nominee for director. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” on the ratification of the

 

 

appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, the non-binding, advisory proposal on compensation and on any other proposal that may properly be brought before the meeting.

How many votes may I cast?

Generally, you are entitled to cast one vote for each share of stock you owned on the record date. The proxy card included with this proxy statement indicates the number of shares owned by an account attributable to you.

How many votes are needed for each proposal?

Directors will be elected by a plurality and the three individuals receiving the highest number of votes cast “for” their election will be elected as directors of Lakeland Financial.

The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm and all other matters must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. Broker non-votes will not be counted as entitled to vote, but will count for purposes of determining whether or not a quorum is present on the matter.

Approval of the executive compensation policies and procedures would require that the number of votes cast in favor exceed the number of votes cast against it. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast, and therefore will not affect the vote. Because this shareholder vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of Directors.

Where do I find the voting results of the meeting?

If available, we will announce voting results at the meeting. The voting results will also be disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

Who bears the cost of soliciting proxies?

We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitations by mail, officers, directors or employees of Lakeland Financial or its subsidiaries may solicit proxies in person or by telephone. These persons will not receive any special or additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to shareholders.

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock at February 25, 2009, by each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock, by each director or nominee, by each executive officer named in the summary compensation table, which can be found later in this proxy statement, and by all directors and executive officers of Lakeland Financial Corporation as a group. Beneficial ownership has been determined for this purpose in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities if he or she has or shares voting power or investment power in respect of such securities or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of securities within 60 days of February 25, 2009.

*Indicates that the individual or entity owns less than one percent of Lakeland Financial’s common stock.

 

 

 

 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Shareholders will be entitled to elect three directors for a term expiring in 2012 at the annual meeting. Our board is divided into three classes of directors having staggered terms of three years. We have no knowledge that any nominee will refuse or be unable to serve, but if any of the nominees is unavailable for election, the holders of the proxies reserve the right to substitute another person of their choice as a nominee when voting at the meeting.

 

Set forth below is information concerning the nominees for election and for each of Lakeland Financial’s other directors, whose term of office will continue after the meeting, including the age, the year first appointed or elected as a director and the other positions held by the person at Lakeland Financial and Lake City Bank. The nominees, if elected at the annual meeting, will serve as directors for a three-year term expiring in 2012, except as noted below. We recommend that shareholders vote “FOR” each of the nominees for director. Unless authority to vote for the nominees is withheld, the shares represented by the proxy card, if executed and returned, will be voted “FOR” the election of the nominees.

 

NOMINEES

 

 

CONTINUING DIRECTORS

 

 

Except as noted above, all directors will hold office for the terms indicated, or until their earlier death, resignation, removal or disqualification, and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the nominees, directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any of our nominees, directors or executive officers have been selected for their respective positions. No nominee, member of the board of directors

 

 

or executive officer is related to any other nominee, member of the board of directors or executive officer. No nominee or director is a director of another “public corporation” (i.e. subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or of any investment company.

 

The business experience of each of the nominees and continuing directors for the past five years is as follows:

 

Mr. Bartels, Jr. is President and Chief Executive Officer of Martin’s Supermarkets, Inc., a regional supermarket chain headquartered in South Bend, Indiana.

 

Mr. Fulmer is Chairman of Heritage Financial Group, Inc., a real estate investment and management company based in Elkhart, Indiana.

 

Mr. Hiatt is Managing Director and Founding Partner of Centerfield Capital Partners, a venture capital investment company headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana.

 

Mr. Kubacki presently serves as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lakeland Financial and Lake City Bank. Prior to joining Lakeland Financial in 1998, Mr. Kubacki served as Executive Vice President of the Northern Trust Bank of California, NA.

 

Mr. Niemier is the former Chief Operating Officer of International Operations for Biomet, Inc., which is a manufacturer of medical and orthopedic devices based in Warsaw, Indiana. He is also a former director of Biomet, Inc. He also serves as a trustee of Valparaiso University.

 

Ms. Pichon is a director of the Cole Foundation, a private charitable foundation focused on northeast Indiana education, economic development and conservation based in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

 

Mr. Pletcher is President of Pletcher Enterprises, Inc., a holding company located in Nappanee, Indiana, and Chief Executive Officer of its principal subsidiary, Amish Acres, LLC, a heritage resort.

 

Mr. Ross is President of Bertsch Services and President of Heartland Coffee Company. Bertsch is a regional food service and vending company and Heartland is a regional coffee and beverage service and vending company. Both companies are based in Warsaw, Indiana.

 

Mr. Steininger is President of Steininger Development, a real estate development company based in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

 

Mr. Tucker is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., which is primarily engaged in duck production, processing and sales, as well as the production and sale of other food products and is headquartered in Milford, Indiana.

 

Mr. Welch is the Chief Executive Officer of Welch Packaging Group, Inc., which is primarily engaged in producing industrial and point of purchase packaging and is headquartered in Elkhart, Indiana.

 

          In addition, the following individuals serve as executive officers of Lakeland Financial and are named in the compensation tables included in this proxy statement:

 

David M. Findlay, age 47, became an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Lakeland Financial and Lake City Bank in September, 2000. Prior to his arrival, Mr. Findlay served as the Chief Financial Officer of Quality Dining, Inc., a publicly traded company with its headquarters in South Bend, Indiana. Prior to that, he served in various capacities with The Northern Trust Company in Chicago.

 

 

Charles D. Smith, age 64, presently serves as an Executive Vice President of Lakeland Financial and Lake City Bank, positions he has held since 2000. He has served as an officer of Lake City Bank since 1983.

 

Kevin L. Deardorff, age 47, presently serves as an Executive Vice President of Lakeland Financial and Lake City Bank, positions he has held since 2001. He has served as an officer of Lake City Bank since 1993.

 

James D. Westerfield, age 51, presently serves as a Senior Vice President and Trust Officer of Lakeland Financial and as head of our Wealth Advisory Group. He joined Lake City Bank in December 2005 and assumed his current responsibilities as of February 2006. Prior to that time, Mr. Westerfield served in similar capacities at other banks since 1995.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. They are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms, and, if appropriate, representations made to us by any reporting person concerning whether a Form 5 was required to be filed for 2008, we are not aware that any of our directors, executive officers or 10% shareholders failed to comply with the filing requirements of Section 16(a) during 2008 except for the following: Mr. Steininger did not timely file one report concerning the acquisition of 10,000 shares of our common stock; Mr. Deardorff did not timely file one report concerning the disposition of 3,000 shares of our common stock; and Mr. Ross did not timely file one report concerning an acquisition of 1,400 shares our common stock through an options exercise.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

General

 

Generally, the board oversees our business and monitors the performance of our management. In accordance with our corporate governance procedures, the board does not involve itself in the day-to-day operations of Lakeland Financial, which is monitored by our executive officers and management. Our directors fulfill their duties and responsibilities by attending regular meetings of the board, which convene monthly, and through committee membership, which is discussed below. Our directors also discuss business and other matters with Mr. Kubacki, our President and Chief Executive Officer, other key executives and our principal external advisers (legal counsel, auditors and other consultants). All members of our board of directors also serve as members of Lake City Bank’s board of directors.

 

With the exception of Mr. Kubacki, all of our current directors are “independent” as defined by The NASDAQ Global Select Market, or Nasdaq, and we have determined that the independent directors do not have other relationships with us that prevent them from making objective, independent decisions. The board of directors has established an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Compensation Committee, among other committees. The current charters of each of these committees are available on our website at www.lakecitybank.com. Also posted on the web site is a general description regarding our company and links to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Our board of directors held 14 meetings during 2008. All of the directors attended at least 75% of the board meetings and meetings of committees of which they were members. While we do not have a specific policy regarding attendance at the annual shareholder meeting, all directors are encouraged and expected to attend the meeting. Last year’s annual meeting was attended by 8 of our 12 directors.

 

 

Audit Committee

 

In 2008, the Audit Committee was comprised of Charles E. Neimier, Robert E. Bartels, Jr., Emily E. Pichon, Richard L. Pletcher, Terry L. Tucker and M. Scott Welch, each of whom is expected to serve on the committee through 2009. Each of the members is considered “independent” according to the Nasdaq listing requirements and the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Niemier qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The board based this decision on Mr. Niemier’s education, his professional experience at an audit firm and his experience as former Chief Financial Officer and board member of Biomet, Inc., a company whose common stock was quoted on the Nasdaq until September 25, 2007, when the company was acquired by a private equity consortium and ceased trading as a public company.

 

The functions performed by the Audit Committee include, among other things, the following:

 

To promote independence of the audit function, the committee consults separately and jointly with the independent registered public accounting firm, the internal auditors and management. We have adopted a written charter for the committee, which sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities. Our current charter is available on our website at www.lakecitybank.com. In 2008, the committee met four times.

 

Compensation Committee

 

During 2008, the Compensation Committee was comprised of L. Craig Fulmer, Charles E. Niemier, Emily E. Pichon, Richard L. Pletcher and Terry L. Tucker, each of whom is expected to serve on the committee through 2009. Each of the members is considered “independent” according to the Nasdaq listing requirements, an “outside” director pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and a “non-employee” director under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The purpose of the committee is to determine the salary and bonus to be paid to Mr. Kubacki, our Chief Executive Officer, and to make a recommendation regarding his compensation to the full board for approval. The committee also reviews and recommends to the board for approval the salaries and bonuses for our other executive officers. Further, the committee administers our equity incentive plans, our long term incentive plan and our executive incentive bonus plan. We have adopted a written charter for the committee, which sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities. Our current charter is available on our website at www.lakecitybank.com. In 2008, the committee met two times.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

We also have a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The members of the committee are Allan J. Ludwig, Steven D. Ross, Donald B. Steininger and M. Scott Welch, and each is considered “independent” according to the Nasdaq listing requirements and is expected to serve on the committee through 2009, except for Mr. Ludwig who retired from the Board in December 2008. The

 

 

primary purposes of the committee are to identify and recommend individuals to be presented to our shareholders for election or re-election to the board of directors and to review and monitor our policies, procedures and structure as they relate to corporate governance. We have adopted a written charter for the committee, which sets forth the committee’s duties and responsibilities. Our current charter is available on our website at www.lakecitybank.com. The committee met one time in 2008.

 

Director Nominations and Qualifications

 

For the 2009 annual meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee nominated for re-election to the board the two incumbent directors, whose terms are set to expire in 2009. This nomination was further approved by the full board. We did not receive any shareholder nominations for director for the 2009 annual meeting.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates all potential nominees for election, including incumbent directors, board nominees and shareholder nominees, in the same manner. Generally, the committee believes that, at a minimum, directors should possess certain qualities, including the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity, a sufficient educational and professional background, demonstrated leadership skills, sound judgment, a strong sense of service to the communities which we serve and an ability to meet the standards and duties set forth in our code of conduct. Additionally, all nominees must be under the age of 70, which is the mandatory retirement age established by the board. The committee also evaluates potential nominees to determine if they have any conflicts of interest that may interfere with their ability to serve as effective board members and to determine whether they are “independent” in accordance with Nasdaq requirements (to ensure that at least a majority of the directors will, at all times, be independent). The committee has not, in the past, retained any third party to assist it in identifying candidates.

 

Shareholder Communication with the Board, Nomination and Proposal Procedures

 

General Communications with the Board. Shareholders may contact Lakeland Financial’s board of directors by contacting Kristin L. Pruitt, Corporate Secretary, at Lakeland Financial Corporation, P.O. Box 1387, Warsaw, Indiana, 46581-1387 or (574) 267-6144. Ms. Pruitt will generally not forward communications that are primarily commercial in nature or related to an improper or irrelevant topic.

 

Nominations of Directors. In accordance with our bylaws, a shareholder may nominate a director for election to the board at an annual meeting of shareholders by delivering written notice of the nomination to our President not fewer than 10 days nor more than 50 days prior to the date of the annual meeting. The shareholder’s notice of intention to nominate a director must include the name and address of the proposed nominee, the principal occupation of the proposed nominee, the name and address of the shareholder making the nomination, and the number of shares of capital stock of Lakeland Financial owned by the notifying shareholder. We may request additional information after receiving the notification.

 

For a shareholder nominee to be considered by our board as a company nominee and included in our proxy statement, the nominating shareholder must file a written notice of the proposed director nomination with our corporate secretary, at the above address, at least 120 days prior to the date the previous year’s proxy statement was mailed to shareholders. Nominations must include the full name and address of the proposed nominee and a brief description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years. All submissions must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The committee may request additional information in order to make a determination as to whether to nominate the person for director.

 

 

          Other Shareholder Proposals. For all other shareholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to our annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2010, shareholder proposals must be received by Kristin L. Pruitt, our Corporate Secretary, at the above address, no later than November 10, 2009, and must otherwise comply with the rules and regulations set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Independent Director Sessions

 

Consistent with the Nasdaq listing requirements, the independent directors regularly have the opportunity to meet without Mr. Kubacki in attendance and in 2008 there were four such sessions. In 2003, the board of directors created the position of a lead independent director, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee appointed L. Craig Fulmer as our lead independent director. This appointment is reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The lead independent director assists the board in assuring effective corporate governance and serves as chairperson of the independent director sessions.

 

Code of Ethics

 

We have a code of conduct in place that applies to all of our directors and employees. The code sets forth the standard of ethics that we expect all of our directors and employees to follow, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The code of conduct is posted on our website at www.lakecitybank.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to or waiver of the code with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website.

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Introduction

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes Lakeland Financial’s compensation philosophy and policies for 2008 as applicable to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 23. This section explains the structure and rationale associated with each material element of the executives’ compensation, and it provides important context for the more detailed disclosure tables and specific compensation amounts provided following the section.

 

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating the compensation plans, policies and programs relating to the executive officers of Lakeland Financial Corporation.

 

The committee relies upon Mr. Kubacki’s assessment of each executive officer’s individual performance, which considers the executive’s efforts in achieving his or her individual goals each year, managing and developing employees and the enhancement of long-term relationships with customers, if applicable to his or her position. Individual goals for executive officers are established by Mr. Kubacki in consultation with each executive officer.

 

The committee’s charter gives it the authority to hire outside consultants to further its objectives and responsibilities. In 2008, the committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., a compensation consulting firm, to assess the effectiveness and structure of our overall executive compensation program. Additionally, on occasion, the committee has consulted with external compensation experts, which have included various consulting firms such as The Delves Group, Clark Consulting and Amalfi Consulting, Inc. In addition, the committee reviews compensation survey data from industry sources such as the Indiana Bankers Association.

 

 

On February 27, 2009, Lakeland Financial accepted capital from the U.S. Department of the Treasury and became a participant in the Capital Purchase Program implemented as a component of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. As a participant, Lakeland Financial is subject to certain executive compensation restrictions established under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Stimulus Bill”), which was enacted on February 17, 2009. As of the writing of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the rules and procedures for applying, and complying with, the executive compensation restrictions were being developed by Treasury, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators and had not yet been fully announced to the public. Therefore, while these executive compensation restrictions will obviously impact our compensation programs moving forward, the committee cannot yet state with certainty the precise impact the restrictions will have on such compensation programs. Lakeland Financial and the committee intend to comply to the extent required with the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions and, to that end, are working with legal counsel and other advisors to determine the extent to which those restrictions will impact Lakeland Financial’s compensation programs.

 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

The overall objectives of Lakeland Financial’s compensation programs are to align executive officer compensation with the success of meeting long-term strategic operating and financial goals. The programs are designed to create meaningful incentives to manage the business successfully with a constant focus on short-term and long-term performance versus the strategic plan and the key operating and financial objectives. Our philosophy is intended to align the interests of executive management with those of our stockholders. The executive compensation program is structured to accomplish the following objectives:

 

 

Compensation Factors

 

General. The committee’s decisions regarding each named executive officer are based, in part on the committee’s subjective judgment and take into account qualitative and quantitative factors, as will be set forth in the discussion below. In reviewing an executive officer’s compensation, the committee considers and evaluates all components of the officer’s total compensation package.

 

Corporate Performance. In establishing executive compensation, the committee measures Lakeland Financial’s performance compared to management’s and the board’s goals and objectives as well as to our peer group performance for financial institutions of comparable size and complexity. The committee believes that using Lakeland Financial’s performance as a factor in determining an executive officer’s compensation is effective in helping to align the executive’s interests with those of our shareholders. With that in mind, the committee focuses on performance versus key financial performance criteria, such as return on beginning equity, return on average assets, revenue growth, diluted earnings per share growth, capital adequacy, the efficiency ratio and asset quality. As part of the evaluation and review of these criteria, the committee will also take into account various subjective issues, such as general economic conditions, including the interest rate environment and its impact on performance, and how they may affect Lakeland Financial’s performance.

 

For purposes of peer analysis in assessing performance, Lakeland Financial generally considers peer groups that include commercial banks of similar asset size. The peer groups used in 2008 generally included financial institutions with total assets of $1.0 billion to $3.0 billion, with a focus on banks located in the central region of the United States. Given the ever-changing landscape within the banking industry, there is no specifically defined group of banks that are utilized for this analysis. The committee engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. in 2008 to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs. For comparative analysis, Frederick W. Cook & Co., Inc. compiled a market reference group of 20 publicly traded bank holding companies headquartered in the Indiana, Ohio, Illinois or Michigan, with median assets of $2 million. In addition, the committee reviews compensation survey data that is readily available to Lakeland Financial from industry sources such as the Indiana Bankers Association.

 

Other factors of corporate performance that may affect an executive’s compensation include succession planning consideration, realization of economies of scale through cost-saving measures, Lakeland Financial’s market share reputation in the communities which it serves, turnover level of employees, as well as less subjective performance considerations. In addition, the committee takes into consideration indirect and intangible business factors such as community involvement and leadership when reviewing executive compensation.

 

Benchmarking. In establishing the compensation of the named executive officers, the committee utilizes market data regarding the compensation practices of other financial institutions of a similar size and complexity. The committee believes that benchmarking is useful to stay competitive in

 

 

the marketplace and for attracting and retaining qualified executives. While the committee believes that it is prudent to consider benchmarking in determining compensation practices, it does not set strict parameters using this data. Rather, the committee uses benchmarking data to ensure that executive compensation is not inconsistent with appropriately defined peer organizations. Generally, the committee believes that the current executive management of the bank has established a track record of long-term performance pursuant to the compensation philosophy and objectives described above that warrant top quartile or better compensation among similarly situated financial institutions. Additionally, the committee will consider data from outside the peer comparison when reviewing compensation practices if that comparison identifies similarities, such as business-line focus and long-term operating and financial stability, which should be considered. For example, institutions with a similar focus on complex commercial lending may be considered by the committee. The peer groups used for comparative purposes in 2008 and for 2009 were generally comprised of banks with total assets of $1.0 billion to $3.0 billion, with a focus on banks located in the central region of the United States. In addition, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc.’s 20 bank holding company peer group was used to benchmark compensation.

 

Individual Performance. When evaluating an executive officer’s individual performance, the committee relies upon Mr. Kubacki’s assessment of individual performance, which considers the executive’s efforts in achieving his or her individual goals each year, managing and developing employees and the enhancement of long-term relationships with customers, if applicable to his or her position. The executive officer’s individual performance and/or individual contribution to the overall company performance depends, to a degree, on what steps are taken to increase revenues and implement cost-saving strategies and the outcome of such strategies. Each executive officer has different goals established that contribute to the long-term strategic goals of the company. Individual goals for executive officers are established by Mr. Kubacki in consultation with each executive officer.

 

Compensation Decisions

 

This section describes the decisions made by the committee with respect to the compensation for the named executive officers for 2008 and 2009. As noted previously, the executive compensation restrictions included in the Stimulus Bill will likely have a significant impact on the decisions made for 2009 (and future years during which Treasury continues to hold an equity interest in Lakeland Financial), but the extent of the impact will not be fully realized until Treasury, Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators implement rules and procedures for applying, and complying with, the restrictions. When the full extent of the executive compensation restrictions is known, the committee will likely have to revisit and revise some, or all, of the 2009 decisions reflected herein.

 

Executive Summary. The major components of executive officer compensation are base salary, bonus, equity awards, long-term incentive awards and additional benefit plans. As previously stated, in reviewing an executive officer’s compensation, the committee considers and evaluates all components of the officer’s total compensation package through the use of tally sheets. We have continued to apply the compensation principles described above in determining the compensation of the executive officers named in Summary Compensation Table on page 23. Our compensation decisions for 2008 factored in Lakeland Financial’s performance versus key financial criteria, including return on beginning equity, return on average assets, revenue growth, diluted earnings per share growth, capital adequacy, efficiency ratio and asset quality. While Lakeland Financial did not achieve 100 % of its targeted goals in net income and other key measures of financial performance in 2008, the committee believes that this was primarily related to the general economic climate and a challenging interest rate environment that severely impacted financial institutions. The committee further believes that Lakeland Financial’s financial performance in 2008 was very strong despite the adverse operating conditions. When compared to its peer group, the committee believes Lakeland Financial’s performance was good and, therefore, the committee weighed heavily Lakeland Financial’s relative performance when compared to its peers.

 

 

Additionally, the committee determined that the named executive officers performed well versus their individual goals for 2008.

 

The following is a brief summary of the compensation decisions the committee affected for 2008 and 2009:

 

The committee strives to provide each executive officer with a competitive total compensation package. If the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions will serve to limit or prohibit the use by the committee of one or more forms of compensation, the committee will likely revisit and adjust the composition of each executive’s total compensation package so that it can continue to provide each executive with a competitive total compensation package of similar value to that described herein.

 

Base Salary. We annually review the base salaries of the named executive officers to determine whether or not they will be adjusted, as described above. The salaries for 2008, determined by the committee at the end of 2007, are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 23. In determining these salary levels, we considered the following:

 

 

 

No specific weighting was applied to these factors, although our performance in 2008 was a contributing factor in setting salaries, as personal performance is rewarded more heavily in cash incentives and long-term incentive awards.

 

At the end of 2008 and in early 2009, the committee determined the base salaries for the executive officers for 2009. The base salaries for 2009 are as follows:

 

 

In determining these base salaries for 2009, we considered the following factors:

 

 

 

No specific weighting was applied to these factors. As mentioned above the committee took into account the general economic factors in the financial industry that are beyond the executive officer’s control. Given the difficulties that financial services companies experienced in 2008, the committee placed particular emphasis in Lakeland Financial’s performance compared to its peers. The committee believes that Lakeland Financial’s performance in 2008 compares very favorably with other financial institutions, including those of our peer group. This is evident by reviewing the Company’s performance against key financial objectives and comparing this performance to the Company’s peer groups. As a result of these factors, the total increase in base salaries for 2008 represents an increase of 4.7 % over 2008 salaries, which is a lesser increase than the prior year.

 

The increase in base salary for 2009 does not, however, take into account the impact of the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions. Once the application of those restrictions has been clarified, further adjustment to base salary for 2009 (and future years) may be necessary.

 

Bonus. The committee determines eligibility for bonus payments using the parameters defined in the company’s Executive Incentive Plan, which is a performance-based bonus plan for selected Lake City Bank corporate officers, including the executive officers. Pursuant to the plan, eligible participants may earn a performance-based bonus. Cash bonuses to executive officers for 2008, including Mr. Kubacki’s, were determined pursuant to the plan, which is reviewed at least annually by the committee. This program applies to all of our executive officers, as well as designated officers of Lake City Bank. As established, the committee retains the right to modify the program and/or withhold payment at any time. Since the plan’s inception in 2002, Lakeland Financial’s performance has warranted payments under the plan.

 

Eligible participants in the bonus program may earn a performance-based bonus based on Lakeland Financial’s overall performance as well as the individual participant’s performance. Our performance is based on our actual net income for that year compared to the budgeted net income. We calculate this by using our net income after the 401(k) match and incentive compensation costs and excluding non-recurring gain/loss on sale of fixed assets, investments, business assets and extinguishment of debt. The committee approves a budgeted net income amount after reviewing the previous year’s actual net income in conjunction with the board’s and management’s expectations for that particular year. Bonus payments under this plan are determined by the formulas described below, although the committee reserves the right to modify the payouts in its sole discretion. The actual net income for each year must equal or exceed 70% of budgeted net income in order for a bonus to be paid that year. If actual to budget net income is at least 70%, the bonus is paid at 50%. If the actual to budget net income is at least 80%, the bonus is paid at 70%. If actual net income to budget net income is at least 90%, the bonus is paid at 90%. If actual net income to budget net income is at least 100%, the bonus is paid at 100%, and so on. Bonuses under the program provide for bonus payments of 3% to 40% of eligible salary. In 2008, the bonus program provided that our President and Chief Executive Officer would receive a bonus up to 40% of his salary, Executive Vice Presidents would receive up to 30% of their salaries and Senior Vice Presidents would receive up to 20% of their salaries. Bonuses for officers receiving promotions during the year were prorated. The amount of the bonus is also determined, in part, on the individual’s overall performance compared to the individual’s performance goals that are established in the beginning of the year by the individual and the other executives.

 

For 2008, our actual net income, calculated as described above, exceeded 90% of the budgeted net income threshold. Given the strong performance through the extraordinarily adverse economic conditions, the committee made a one-time exception to the formula described above. The committee determined that for 2008 only, if the actual net income, calculated as described above, exceeded 90% of the budgeted net income threshold, bonuses would be paid at 100%. This resulted in aggregated bonus payments of approximately $1.3 million paid to 145 employees. The bonuses paid to Mr. Kubacki and

 

 

the other named executive officers are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 23 of this Proxy Statement and were established pursuant to the bonus program. The budgeted net income for the bonus plan is approved each year by the Compensation Committee after consultation with Mr. Kubacki. The amount is generally increased each year in order to provide a proper level of incentive to the officers and, in the committee’s view, it is not at a level that guarantees the target threshold will be obtained. Lakeland Financial has achieved net income above 90% of its target for the plan in each of the past three years.

 

For 2009, the committee has determined that the historic formulas described above for determining the amount of the bonus payout should be revised. It is now the committee’s intention to pay a percentage of the bonus amount equal to the percentage amount of actual net income achieved against the budgeted net income. For example, if actual net income equals 95% of the budgeted net income amount, the bonus payout would be at the 95% level. However, it is likely that the executive compensation restrictions contained in the Stimulus Bill will prohibit Lakeland Financial from paying or accruing bonuses on behalf of the executive officers during 2009 (and future years during which Treasury continues to hold an equity interest in Lakeland Financial). Therefore, the committee may be required to revisit and reevaluate the bonus component of each executive’s total compensation package.

 

Long-Term Incentive Plan. In 2006, the Company implemented a long-term incentive (“LTI”) plan based on recommendations received from a compensation consultant in 2005. The plan was designed to provide for performance-based payouts based upon key financial criteria, including average revenue growth rate, average diluted earnings per share growth rate and average return on beginning equity over a rolling three year period. The committee made grants under the LTI plan in 2006, 2007 and 2008. During 2008, the committee engaged a Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., a compensation consulting firm, to assess the effectiveness and structure of our overall executive compensation program. Based on the findings and recommendations of that assessment, the committee determined that it would be in the best interest of the shareholders for the LTI plan awards to be denominated in Company shares rather than cash to provide for additional alignment with shareholders and stock price performance over the performance period.

 

The purpose of the LTI plan is to motivate select officers to collectively produce outstanding results, encourage superior performance, increase productivity and aid in attracting and retaining key employees. Mr. Kubacki recommends, subject to the committee’s approval, the performance measures and performance targets to be used for each performance period and the LTI bonus to be paid if certain required conditions are met. Performance targets are based on a combination of Lakeland Financial’s goals, business unit and/or individual goals or on such other factors that the committee may determine and approve. Different performance targets may be established for different participants for any performance period, although currently all executives have the same performance targets.

 

The plan measures performance against three key criteria over a three-year performance period: revenue growth, diluted earnings per share growth and average return on equity. Unless the committee determines otherwise, a new three-year performance period will begin each year. Thus, the maximum number of performance periods open to measurement at any time is three. Going forward, executive officers will have the ability to receive LTI plan bonus payouts on a yearly basis at the conclusion of each successive three-year performance period.

 

The amount of the LTI bonus awarded for each performance period is based upon achieving certain performance thresholds for each of the three measurement criteria. Under the plan, performance on each of the three measurement criteria is computed for the three-year period from the start date and constitutes 33.33% of the overall vesting calculation. For the 2007-2009 performance periods, the target performance levels were 5.00% revenue growth, 10.00% diluted earnings per share growth and 15.00% average return on equity growth. For the 2008-2010 performance periods, the target performance levels were 6.00% revenue growth, 5.00% diluted earnings per share growth and 11.00% average return on

 

 

equity growth. The Committee directed management to accrue for the open periods at an amount equal to the sum of the percentages of the actual financial performance against the targeted thresholds, with each of the three criteria valued at 33.33% of the total accrual. 

 

At its discretion, the committee may adjust performance goals and/or performance measure results for extraordinary events or accounting adjustments resulting from significant asset purchases or dispositions or other events not contemplated or otherwise considered by the committee when the performance measures and targets were set. Given the previously discussed negative impact of general economic conditions and a challenging interest rate environment on the financial services industry, the committee reconsidered the established performance thresholds and plan structure in 2008.  Because one of the key purposes of the plan is to aid in retaining key employees, the committee believes that the target thresholds must be reasonable in light of the current operating environment for the financial services industry.  The committee determined that the performance targets were not, in fact, reflective of the realities of the operating environment. Given the Committee’s overall view that management’s performance continues to be strong and that this retention feature is desirable, the committee determined to amend the performance targets for the 2008 and 2009 plan years as follows: 6.00% revenue growth, 5.00% diluted earnings per share growth and 11.00% average return on equity growth.    

 

At the end of 2008, the first performance period ended under the LTI plan. Although the Company’s financial performance did not meet 100% of some of the targets established under the LTI plan, the committee determined that the Company should pay out the first awards under the LTI plan at 67% given the overall strong performance of the financial performance of the Company. The committee reconsidered the target thresholds set in 2006 in light of the dramatically different economic environment and the performance of the Company against peer banks. This resulted in aggregate payouts of $276,900 to 12 officers. The payouts to the named executive officers for the first performance period in 2009 were as follows:

 

 

The target award that each named executive officer may earn under the 2007-2009, 2008-2010 and 2009-2011 performance periods is as follows:

 

 

 

 

As with the annual bonus component of compensation, the Stimulus Bill will likely prevent Lakeland Financial from paying or accruing any long-term incentives for the executive officers under the LTI plan during any years during which Treasury holds an equity interest in Lakeland Financial. Therefore, the committee will likely revisit and reevaluate the long-term incentive component of the executive officers’ total compensation packages.

 

Equity Awards. In 2008, the shareholders approved the Lakeland Financial Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. A total of 30,000 stock options were issued in 2008 to the named executive officers under that plan, as set forth on the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End table on page 25. The committee uses stock options to provide appropriate equity-based incentives to employees, including executive management.

 

Under the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions, Lakeland Financial will likely be prohibited from granting stock options to the executive officers during the period during which Treasury holds an equity interest in Lakeland Financial. Therefore, the committee will likely need to reconsider the use of stock options as an incentive or retention tool with respect to the executive officers.

 

All Other Compensation and Perquisites. While the committee reviews and monitors the level of other compensation offered to the named executive officers, the committee typically does not adjust the level of benefits offered on an annual basis. The committee does consider the benefits and perquisites offered to the named executive officers in its evaluation of the total compensation received by each. It is our belief that perquisites for executive officers should be very limited in scope and value and reflective of similar perquisites from competitive employers both in the industry and the region. Due to this philosophy, Lakeland Financial has generally provided nominal benefits to executives that are not available to all full time employees and we plan to continue this approach in the future. The benefits offered in 2008 to the named executive officers will continue for 2009, unless such benefits are in the future determined to be limited or prohibited by the Stimulus Bill, and the perquisites received by the named executive officers in 2008 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 23.

 

Conclusion

 

After considering all components of the compensation paid to the named executive officers, the committee has determined that the compensation is reasonable and not excessive.

 

In making this determination, we considered many factors, including the following:

 

However, the committee acknowledges that the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions, when finally and fully implemented, will likely require it to reconsider, in their entirety, the compensation programs currently maintained by Lakeland Financial.

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

             We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussion with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in Lakeland Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

L. Craig Fulmer

Charles E. Niemer

Emily E. Pichon

Richard L. Pletcher

Terry L. Tucker

 

Members of the Compensation Committee

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

          The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our other three most highly compensated executive officers in 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grants of Plan Based Awards

 

The following table provides information on possible non-equity performance amounts that are payable under the Executive Incentive Plan and the Lakeland Financial Corporation Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan. These plans are described in more detail in the Compensation Analysis and Discussion section. The estimated amounts set forth in the table are subject to the terms of the respective plan and company and individual performance, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section. Future payouts may be prohibited as a result of restrictions on executive compensation that apply to companies that are participants in Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program. Further, payment or accrual of any amounts pursuant to the plans during the period during which Treasury holds an equity interest in Lakeland Financial will likely be prohibited by the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions. In light of these considerations, there can be no assurance that the future payouts will ever be realized.

 

 

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning the exercisable and unexercisable stock options at December 31, 2008 held by the individuals named in the summary compensation table

 

 

 

otherwise scheduled vesting date occurs during a period during which Treasury holds an equity interest in Lakeland Financial.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2008

The following table sets forth information concerning the exercise of options in 2008 by the individuals named in the summary compensation table

 

Pension Benefits

 

Our defined benefit retirement plan covers certain employees over 21 years of age with more than one year of service. Effective April 1, 2000, we amended the plan to freeze the accrual of benefits to participants under the plan. As a result of this amendment, employees who were not participants in the plan as of March 31, 2000 are no longer able to become participants under the plan. In addition, all benefits previously accrued under the plan by participants were frozen in place, and continuing employment with us will not increase the employee’s benefits upon retirement. Normal retirement age is

 

 

65. Participants received credit for 2-1/2% of their average salary for each year up to 20 years of service or through March 31, 2000, whichever occurred first.

 

          The principal benefit under this plan is a lifetime annuity for the joint lives of participants and their spouses. This amount is offset by social security benefits. On December 31, 1985, the then existing plan was terminated and the latest plan (which is now frozen) was adopted effective January 1, 1986. Participants in the terminated plan were paid cash or received annuities for their earned benefits as of December 31, 1985. The amounts paid for annuities purchased, as a part of the plan termination will reduce the benefits to be paid out of the latest plan.

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Effective January 1, 2004, we adopted the Lake City Bank Deferred Compensation Plan. The purpose of the plan is to provide for salary deferral at the participants voluntary election for certain individuals without regard to statutory limitations under tax qualified plans. The plan is available to all of our executive officers. The plan is funded solely by participant contributions and does not receive a company match. Participants may defer a portion of their salary or bonus under the plan and invest the deferred portion in a mutual fund-like investment pool managed by an independent third party. Participants may elect to receive the funds in a lump sum or in up to 10 annual installments following retirement, but may not make withdrawals during their employment, except in the event of hardship as approved by the Compensation Committee. All deferral elections and associated distribution schedules are irrevocable.

 

 

As noted above, all contributions to the plan are funded solely by voluntary participant contributions, which represent a deferral of annual salary, and there are no company match payments. All aggregate earnings shown above represent investment and interest return on participant contributions and is not an additional payment by Lakeland Financial. However, future accrual of earnings during years during which Treasury holds an equity interest in Lakeland Financial may be prohibited pursuant to the executive compensation restrictions contained in the Stimulus Bill.

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation restrictions will prohibit Lakeland Financial from making “any payment” to the named executive officers “for departure from [Lakeland Financial] for any reason, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued.” Therefore, even though we have set forth below an overview of the payments that would have been due had a termination occurred as of December 31, 2008, it is likely that the application of the Stimulus Bill’s executive compensation rules would result in a prohibition of all such payments, except to the extent previously accrued pursuant

 

 

to generally accepted accounting principles, to a named executive officer if such officer terminated employment during a period during which Treasury held an equity interest in Lakeland Financial.

The following table sets forth information concerning potential payments and benefits under our compensation programs and benefit plans to which the named executive officers would be entitled upon a termination of employment as of December 31, 2008. As is more fully described below, four of the five named executive officers, Messrs. Kubacki, Findlay, Smith and Deardorff, have entered into change in control agreements with Lakeland Financial (each, a “Change in Control Agreement”), which provide for payments and benefits to a terminating executive following a change in control of Lakeland Financial. Except for the payments and benefits provided by the Change in Control Agreements, all other payments and benefits provided to any named executive officer upon termination of his employment are the same as the payments and benefits provided to other eligible executives of Lakeland Financial. For purposes of estimating the value of certain equity awards we have assumed a price per share of our common stock of $23.82, which was the closing price of our stock on December 31, 2008, the last trading day of the year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued Pay and Regular Retirement Benefits. The amounts shown in the table above do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment. These include:

•    Regular pension benefits under our defined benefit retirement plan. See “Pension Benefits” on page 26.

 

 

•    Distributions of plan balances under our 401(k) plan and the Lake City Bank Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). See “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” on page 27 for information on current account balances and an overview of the Deferred Compensation Plan.

•    The value of option continuation upon retirement, death or disability. Except as may be provided in connection with a change in control, when an employee terminates employment prior to retirement, death or disability, his or her stock options, whether vested or unvested, are terminated immediately. However, when a retirement-eligible employee terminates, or when an employee dies or becomes disabled, his or her options remain in force for 12 months following the date of his or her termination.

Death, Disability and Retirement. A termination of employment due to disability does not entitle the named executive officers to any payments or benefits that are not available to salaried employees generally. As is the case with any other eligible participant under our LTI Plan (as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 19 through 21 above), termination of employment due to death or retirement will entitle the named executive officers to a pro rated bonus under such plan. In addition, as is also the case with any other eligible participant under our Executive Incentive Plan (as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 18 through 19 above), termination of employment due to retirement will entitle the named executive officers to a pro rated bonus under such plan.

Acceleration of Vesting Upon a Change in Control. All employees, including the named executive officers, who receive stock options under our Amended and Restated 1997 Share Incentive Plan will immediately vest in any unvested stock options held by such employee, provided that it has been at least two years from the date on which the stock options were granted, upon the occurrence of a change in control. Any such options, the vesting of which is accelerated upon the occurrence of a change in control, shall remain exercisable for a period of three months following an employee’s termination of employment, if such termination of employment occurs within one year of the change in control.

Change in Control Agreements. Other than as is provided in the Change in Control Agreements, and except as is provided in accordance with the terms of our Amended and Restated 1997 Share Incentive Plan, no named executive officer will be entitled to any payments or benefits as a result of the occurrence of a change in control or as a result of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control. In the case of a termination of employment by the company within 12 months prior to, or 12 months immediately following, a change in control, or in the case of a termination of employment by an executive within 12 months following a change in control, the Change in Control Agreements provide for the following:

•     Payment, in a single lump sum, of a severance benefit equal to two times the sum of (i) the greater of the executive’s then current base salary or the executive’s annual base salary as of the date one day prior to his termination, (ii) the designated percentage of the amount determined under (i) above payable as annual bonus compensation for the year in which the Change in Control occurs, and (iii) the aggregate dollar amount accrued under the Long Term Incentive Plan payable in the two plan years subsequent to the Change in Control.

•     To the extent the executive (or any of the executive’s dependents) was eligible to be covered under the terms of our medical and dental plans for active employees immediately prior to his termination date, we will provide the executive (and his dependents, if any) with equivalent coverages for a period not to exceed 24 months from the date of termination of employment. In the event that the executive (and/or his dependents, if any) become eligible for coverage under the terms of any other medical and/or dental plan of a subsequent employer which plan benefits are comparable to our plan benefits, coverage under our plans will cease for the executive (and/or his dependents, if any).

 

 

•     Upon a change in control, executives may be subject to certain excise taxes under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. We have agreed to reimburse the executives for those excise taxes as well as any income and excise taxes payable by the executive as a result of any reimbursements for the 280G excise taxes. While circumstances could exist under which excise tax gross-up payments would be due to the executives, we do not believe that any payments made to an executive as a result of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control occurring on December 31, 2008 would result in the imposition of an excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code.

In exchange for the payments and benefits provided under the Change in Control Agreements, the executives agree to be bound by a two-year restrictive covenant, which will be effective throughout the geographic area within a 60 mile radius from the center of Warsaw, Indiana. The restrictive covenant will prohibit the executive from competing, in any way, with the Company for the two-year period.

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

During 2008, directors who were not employees of Lakeland Financial or Lake City Bank were paid $800 for each board meeting attended and $700 for each committee meeting attended. Each director also received a retainer of $13,000 for service on the board and the chairperson of the Audit Committee received an additional $2,000 and the lead director received an additional $1,000. For 2009, each director will be paid $800 for each board meeting attended and $700 for each committee meeting attended. Each director will also receive a retainer of $15,000 for service on the board and the chairperson of the Audit Committee will receive an additional $4,000, the lead director will receive an additional $2,000, the chairperson of the Compensation Committee will receive an additional $2,000 and the chairperson of the governance committee will receive an additional $1,000. Each director of Lakeland Financial is also a director of Lake City Bank and is not compensated separately for service on the bank’s board. Mr. Kubacki, who is a director and also our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not paid any fees for his service as director. The directors’ fees are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee.

Additionally, under the 1997 Share Incentive Plan and the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan directors may be awarded non-qualified stock options at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Stock options awarded to directors under the plan are subject to the same rules and restrictions as those awarded to named executives. Further, upon a change of control, all options held by participants in the plan become fully exercisable. Generally, each director receives options to purchase 3,000 shares of our common stock at the time the director joins the board. In 2008 each non-employee director was awarded options to purchase 1,000 shares.

 

 

The following table provides information on 2008 compensation for non-employee directors who served during 2008.

 

 

 

ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, signed into law on February 17, 2009 (the “ARRA”), includes a provision requiring Capital Purchase Program participants, during the period in which any obligation arising from assistance provided under the program remains outstanding, to permit a separate shareholder vote to approve the compensation of executives as disclosed pursuant to the compensation rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This requirement applies to any proxy, consent, or authorization for an annual or other meeting of the participant’s shareholders. Under the ARRA, the shareholder vote is not binding on the Board of Directors and may not be construed as overruling any decision by the participant’s Board of Directors.

 

 

As described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the overall objectives of Lakeland Financial’s compensation programs have been to align executive officer compensation with the success of meeting long-term strategic operating and financial goals. The Board of Directors believes our compensation policies and procedures achieve this objective and therefore recommend shareholders vote “For” the proposal.

 

Accordingly, because we became a participant in the Capital Purchase Program on February 27, 2009, the following resolution is submitted for shareholder approval:

 

RESOLVED, that the Company's shareholders approve its executiv3e compensation as described in the section captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the tabular disclosure regarding named executive officer compensation under “Executive Compensation” contained in the Company's proxy statement dated March 16, 2009

 

Under the ARRA, your vote is advisory and will not be binding upon the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future compensation arrangements.

 

 

 

STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The stock price performance graph below shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Lakeland Financial specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

          The graph below compares the cumulative total return of Lakeland Financial, the Nasdaq Market Index and a peer group index.

 

 

 

The peer group index is comprised of 132 financial institution holding companies in the United States with total assets between $1.0 billion and $3.0 billion whose equity securities were traded on an exchange or national quotation service.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

During 2008 Lake City Bank had extended, and expects to continue to extend, loans to its directors and officers and to their related interests. Such loans were, and will continue to be, made only upon the same terms, conditions, interest rates, and collateral requirements as those prevailing at the same time for comparable loans extended from time to time to other, unrelated borrowers. Loans to directors and officers do not and will not involve greater risks of collectibility, or present other unfavorable features, than loans to other borrowers. All such loans are approved by the Lake City Bank board of directors in accordance with the bank regulatory requirements. Additionally, the Audit Committee pre-approves other non-lending transactions between a director and either Lakeland Financial or Lake City Bank to ensure that such transactions do not affect a director’s independence.

 

34

---

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The report of the Audit Committee below shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Lakeland Financial specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 

The Audit Committee assists the board in carrying out its oversight responsibilities for our financial reporting process, audit process and internal controls. The Audit Committee also reviews the audited financial statements and recommends to the board that they be included in our annual report on Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2008, the committee was comprised solely of independent directors.

 

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 with our management and Crowe Horwath LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The committee has also discussed with Crowe Horwath the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification for Statements on Auditing Standards) as well as having received and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from Crowe Horwath required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526, communication with Audit Committees concerning independence. Based on the review and discussions with management and Crowe Horwath, the committee has recommended to the board that the audited financial statements be included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

                                                                                                                   Submitted by:

Robert E. Bartels, Jr.

Charles E. Niemier

Emily E. Pichon

Richard L. Pletcher

Terry L. Tucker

M. Scott Welch

 

Members of the Audit Committee

 

 

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

          Shareholders are also being asked to ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. If the appointment of Crowe Horwath is not ratified by shareholders, the matter of the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm will be considered by the Audit Committee and board of directors. A representative of Crowe Horwath is expected to be present at the annual meeting.

 

Accountant Fees

 

Audit Fees. The aggregate amount of fees billed or expected to be billed by Crowe Horwath LLP for its audit of Lakeland Financial’s annual financial statements for fiscal years 2008 and 2007, for its required reviews of our unaudited interim financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs filed during fiscal 2008 and 2007, for the integrated audit of internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and for consents and assistance with documents filed with the SEC were $283,700 and $264,000.

 

Audit Related Fees. The aggregate amounts of audit related fees billed by Crowe Horwath LLP for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were $36,150 and $27,697. The services included employee benefit plan audits and accounting and financial reporting related consultations.

 

Tax Fees. The aggregate amounts of tax related services billed by Crowe Horwath for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were $64,950 and $76,300, for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. The services provided included assistance with the preparation of Lakeland Financial’s tax return and guidance with respect to estimated tax payments and for assistance implementing a real estate investment trust in 2007 and continuing services related to maintaining the trust.

 

All Other Fees. The aggregate amounts of other services billed by Crowe Horwath for fiscal year 2008 and 2007 were $87,685 and $37,658 for professional services rendered for assistance with Bank Secrecy Act reviews, regulatory compliance reviews and training and software license fees. We did not incur any other fees from Crowe Horwath for fiscal year 2008 and 2007 other than the fees reported above.

 

          The Audit Committee, after consideration of the matter, does not believe the rendering of these services by Crowe Horwath to be incompatible with maintaining Crowe Horwath’s independence as our independent registered public accounting firm.

 

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

 

Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by Crowe Horwath. These services include audit and audit-related services, tax services, and other services. Crowe Horwath and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by Crowe Horwath in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis that the committee had not already specifically approved.

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

A copy of our Annual Report to Shareholders for the 2008 fiscal year, which also includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (including financial statements), accompanies this proxy statement.

 

 

 

 

March 16, 2009

Warsaw, Indiana