e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED July 3, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-51598
iROBOT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0259 335 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
8 Crosby Drive
Bedford, MA 01730
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(781) 430-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock as of July 30, 2010 was
25,388,365.
iROBOT CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 3, 2010
INDEX
2
iROBOT CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
75,810 |
|
|
$ |
71,856 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
22,957 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $90 at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 |
|
|
27,133 |
|
|
|
35,171 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
30,684 |
|
|
|
32,406 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
8,669 |
|
|
|
8,669 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
170,856 |
|
|
|
159,011 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
22,374 |
|
|
|
20,230 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
6,089 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
14,008 |
|
|
|
14,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
212,861 |
|
|
$ |
199,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
31,768 |
|
|
$ |
30,559 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
13,363 |
|
|
|
14,384 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
11,153 |
|
|
|
13,525 |
|
Deferred revenue and customer advances |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
58,253 |
|
|
|
62,376 |
|
Long term liabilities |
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
4,014 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized and none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 25,373,871 and
25,091,619 issued and outstanding at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
146,603 |
|
|
|
140,613 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
(7,565 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
150,809 |
|
|
|
133,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
212,861 |
|
|
$ |
199,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
iROBOT CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
85,945 |
|
|
$ |
52,609 |
|
|
$ |
172,056 |
|
|
$ |
102,300 |
|
Contract revenue |
|
|
11,859 |
|
|
|
8,731 |
|
|
|
20,678 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
97,804 |
|
|
|
61,340 |
|
|
|
192,734 |
|
|
|
118,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue (1) |
|
|
55,825 |
|
|
|
37,098 |
|
|
|
111,425 |
|
|
|
70,537 |
|
Cost of contract revenue (1) |
|
|
8,009 |
|
|
|
7,833 |
|
|
|
14,622 |
|
|
|
15,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
63,834 |
|
|
|
44,931 |
|
|
|
126,047 |
|
|
|
85,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
33,970 |
|
|
|
16,409 |
|
|
|
66,687 |
|
|
|
32,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development (1) |
|
|
5,691 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
10,190 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
Selling and marketing (1) |
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
8,940 |
|
|
|
20,225 |
|
|
|
17,906 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
9,313 |
|
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
17,789 |
|
|
|
14,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
25,585 |
|
|
|
20,201 |
|
|
|
48,204 |
|
|
|
39,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8,385 |
|
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
|
|
18,483 |
|
|
|
(7,260 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
8,425 |
|
|
|
(3,701 |
) |
|
|
18,552 |
|
|
|
(7,468 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
(3,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,314 |
|
|
$ |
(2,609 |
) |
|
$ |
11,482 |
|
|
$ |
(4,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Number of shares used in calculations per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,294 |
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
|
|
25,217 |
|
|
|
24,946 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
26,375 |
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
|
|
26,226 |
|
|
|
24,946 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total stock-based compensation recorded in the three and six months ended July 3, 2010 and
June 27, 2009 included in the above figures breaks down by expense classification as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
491 |
|
Cost of contract revenue |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
iROBOT CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
11,482 |
|
|
$ |
(4,396 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,755 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
3,497 |
|
Benefit from deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
Non-cash director deferred compensation |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (use) source |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
8,038 |
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
5,922 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
(2,163 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(1,031 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
634 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
342 |
|
Long term liabilities |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
25,168 |
|
|
|
11,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions of property and equipment |
|
|
(5,668 |
) |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(25,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Sales of investments |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(23,579 |
) |
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
Income tax withholding payment associated with restricted stock vesting |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Tax benefit of excess stock-based compensation deductions |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,954 |
|
|
|
10,137 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
|
71,856 |
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period |
|
$ |
75,810 |
|
|
$ |
50,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
7,726 |
|
|
$ |
598 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
During the six months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009, the Company transferred $1,352 and
$787, respectively, of inventory to fixed assets.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Description of Business
iRobot Corporation (iRobot or the Company) develops robotics and artificial intelligence
technologies and applies these technologies in producing and marketing robots. The majority of the
Companys revenue is generated from product sales and government and industrial research and
development contracts.
The Company is subject to risks common to companies in high-tech industries including, but not
limited to, uncertainty of progress in developing technologies, new technological innovations,
dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with government
regulations, uncertainty of market acceptance of products, the need to obtain financing, if
necessary, global economic conditions and associated impact on consumer spending, and changes in
policies and spending priorities of the U.S. federal government and other government agencies.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include those of iRobot and its
subsidiaries, after elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions. iRobot has prepared
the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial data as of July 3, 2010 and for the three and six months ended July
3, 2010 and June 27, 2009 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited
financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. These consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010, filed with
the SEC on February 19, 2010.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to state fairly its statement of
financial position as of July 3, 2010 and results of operations and cash flows for the periods
ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009 have been made. The results of operations and cash flows for
any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the operating results and cash flows for the
full fiscal year or any future periods.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates and
judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, sales returns, bad debts, warranty
claims, inventory reserves, valuation of investments, assumptions used in valuing stock-based
compensation instruments and income taxes. The Company bases these estimates on historical and
anticipated results, and trends and on various other assumptions that the Company believes are
reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form
the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree
of uncertainty. Actual results may differ from the Companys estimates.
Fiscal Year-End
The Company operates and reports using a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest
to December 31. Accordingly, the Companys fiscal quarters end on the Saturday that falls closest
to the last day of the third month of each quarter.
6
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue from product sales, government research and development
contracts, and commercial research and development contracts. The Company sells products directly
to customers and indirectly through resellers and distributors. The Company recognizes revenue from
sales of home robots under the terms of the customer agreement upon transfer of title and risk of
loss to the customer, net of estimated returns, provided that collection is determined to be
reasonably assured and no significant obligations remain. Sales to resellers are subject to
agreements allowing for limited rights of return for defective products only, rebates and price
protection. The Company has typically not taken product returns except for defective products.
Accordingly, the Company reduces revenue for its estimates of liabilities for these rights at the
time the related sale is recorded. The Company makes an estimate of sales returns for products sold
by resellers directly based on historical returns experience and other relevant data. The Companys
international distributor agreements do not currently allow for product returns and, as a result,
no reserve for returns is established for this group of customers. The Company has aggregated and
analyzed historical returns from resellers and end users which form the basis of its estimate of
future sales returns by resellers or end users. When a right of return exists, the provision for
these estimated returns is recorded as a reduction of revenue at the time that the related revenue
is recorded. If actual returns differ significantly from its estimates, such differences could have
a material impact on the Companys results of operations for the period in which the returns become
known. The estimates for returns are adjusted periodically based upon historical rates of returns.
The estimates and reserve for rebates and price protection are based on specific programs, expected
usage and historical experience. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Under cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) type contracts, the Company recognizes revenue based on
costs incurred plus a pro rata portion of the total fixed fee. Costs incurred include labor and
material that are directly associated with individual CPFF contracts plus indirect overhead and
general and administrative type costs based upon billing rates submitted by the Company to, and
provisionally approved by, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Annually, the Company
submits final indirect billing rates to DCMA based upon actual costs incurred throughout the year.
These final billing rates are subject to audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency,which can occur
several years after the final billing rates are submitted and may result in material adjustments to
revenue recognized based on estimated final billing rates. In the situation where the Companys
anticipated actual billing rates will be lower than the provisional rates currently in effect, the
Company records a cumulative revenue adjustment in the period in which the rate differential is
identified. Revenue on firm fixed price (FFP) contracts is recognized using the
percentage-of-completion method. For government product FFP contracts revenue is recognized as the
product is shipped or in accordance with the contract terms. Costs and estimated gross margins on
contracts are recorded as revenue as work is performed based on the percentage that incurred costs
compare to estimated total costs utilizing the most recent estimates of costs and funding. Changes
in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from final
contract settlements and government audit, may result in revisions to costs and income and are
recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Since many contracts extend over a
long period of time, revisions in cost and funding estimates during the progress of work have the
effect of adjusting earnings applicable to past performance in the current period. When the current
contract estimate indicates a loss, a provision is made for the total anticipated loss in the
current period. Revenue earned in excess of billings, if any, is recorded as unbilled revenue.
Billings in excess of revenue earned, if any, are recorded as deferred revenue.
Accounting for Share-Based Payments
The Company accounts for share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options and awards in the form of restricted shares and restricted stock units by establishing the
fair value of each option grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the fair value of
awards based on stock price at the time of grant. The fair value of share-based payments is
recorded by the Company as a charge against earnings. The Company recognizes share-based payment
expense over the requisite service period of the underlying grants and awards. The Companys
share-based payment awards are accounted for as equity instruments.
7
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The following table presents the calculation of both basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,314 |
|
|
$ |
(2,609 |
) |
|
$ |
11,482 |
|
|
$ |
(4,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
25,294 |
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
|
|
25,217 |
|
|
|
24,946 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and restricted shares |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
26,375 |
|
|
|
24,967 |
|
|
|
26,226 |
|
|
|
24,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Diluted income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
Potentially dilutive securities representing approximately 1.0 million and 3.1 million shares
of common stock for the three month periods ended July 3, 2010
and June 27, 2009, respectively, and approximately
1.1 million and 3.2 million shares of common stock for the six months ended July 3, 2010 and June
27, 2009, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for these
periods because their effect would have been antidilutive.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the book and tax basis of assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are
expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided if based upon the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against state deferred tax assets due
to less certainty of their realizability given the shorter expiration period associated with them
and the generation of state tax credits in excess of the state tax liability. The Company evaluates
the need for the valuation allowance against state deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. At
July 3, 2010, the Company has total deferred tax assets of $18.2 million and a valuation allowance
of $3.9 million resulting in a net deferred tax asset of $14.3 million.
The Company recorded $3.1 million of income tax expense and $1.1 million of income tax benefit
for the three months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009, respectively. The projected annual
effective tax rates for income taxes were 38% and 36% at July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009,
respectively.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on certain investments. The differences between
net income and comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
June 27, 2009 |
|
Net income (loss), as reported |
|
$ |
5,314 |
|
|
$ |
(2,609 |
) |
|
$ |
11,482 |
|
|
$ |
(4,396 |
) |
Unrealized gains on investments |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,438 |
|
|
$ |
(2,609 |
) |
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
|
$ |
(4,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
The authoritative guidance for fair value establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than
quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3,
defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an
entity to develop its own assumptions.
8
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
The Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at July 3, 2010, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of July 3, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts |
|
$ |
5,057 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment in bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
5,057 |
|
|
$ |
22,957 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at January 2, 2010, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market accounts |
|
$ |
20,077 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Investment in bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
20,077 |
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each table above, the bond investments are valued based on observable market inputs as of
the Companys reporting date and are included in Level 2 inputs.
The vast majority of our Level 2 bond investments were priced by a
pricing vendor. The pricing vendor relies on a comprehensive
multi-dimensional relational model that uses standard inputs
including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes,
issue spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers
and reference data including market research publications. The bond investments are recorded
at fair value and marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period and realized and unrealized
gains and losses are included in comprehensive income (loss) for that period. The fair value of the
Companys bond investments are included in short term investments in its consolidated balance
sheet.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for
an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company
tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an
operating segment) annually or more frequently if the Company believes indicators of impairment
exist. The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment
test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate
carrying values, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the
reporting units fair value, the Company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test
to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test
involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting units goodwill with the
carrying value of that goodwill.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an amendment to the
accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of
variable interest entities (VIEs).
The elimination of the concept of a Qualifying Special Purpose Entity (QSPE), removes the
exception from applying the consolidation guidance within this amendment. This amendment requires
an enterprise to perform a qualitative analysis when determining whether or not it must consolidate
a VIE and requires an enterprise to continuously reassess whether it must consolidate a VIE.
Additionally, this amendment requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprises involvement with
VIEs and any significant change in risk exposure due to that involvement, as well as how its
involvement with VIEs impacts the enterprises financial statements. Finally, an enterprise will be
required to disclose significant judgments and assumptions used to determine whether or not to
consolidate a VIE. This amendment is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009. The implementation of this amendment did not impact the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, FASB updated the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The
updated guidance requires companies to disclose separately the investments that transfer in and out
of Levels 1 and 2 and the reasons for those transfers. Additionally, in the reconciliation for fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), companies should present
separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The Company adopted the
updated guidance at the beginning of fiscal 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements in the Level 3 reconciliation,
9
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company will adopt the
remaining guidance at the beginning of fiscal 2011. The adoption of the required guidance did not
have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or disclosures. The
Company does not expect that the adoption of the remaining guidance will have an impact on its
financial position, results of operations, or disclosures.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the
Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that
the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
3. Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2 , |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
5,771 |
|
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
24,681 |
|
|
|
27,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,684 |
|
|
$ |
32,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Stock Option Plans
The Company has options outstanding under three stock incentive plans: the 1994 Stock Option
Plan (the 1994 Plan), the 2004 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan) and the 2005
Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan and together with the 1994 Plan and the 2004 Plan,
the Plans). The 2005 Plan is the only one of the three plans under which new awards may currently
be granted. Under the 2005 Plan, which became effective October 10, 2005, 1,583,682 shares were
initially reserved for issuance in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock awards and restricted stock awards.
Additionally, the 2005 Plan provides that the number of shares reserved and available for issuance
under the plan will automatically increase each January 1, beginning in 2007, by 4.5% of the
outstanding number of shares of common stock on the immediately preceding December 31. Stock
options returned to the Plans as a result of their expiration, cancellation or termination are
automatically made available for issuance under the 2005 Plan. Eligibility for incentive stock
options is limited to those individuals whose employment status would qualify them for the tax
treatment associated with incentive stock options in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. As of July 3, 2010, there were 2,173,728 shares available for future grant under
the 2005 Plan.
Options granted under the Plans are subject to terms and conditions as determined by the
compensation committee of the board of directors, including vesting periods. Options granted under
the Plans are exercisable in full at any time subsequent to vesting, generally vest over periods
from zero to five years, and expire seven or ten years from the date of grant or, if earlier, 60 or
90 days from employee termination. The exercise price of incentive stock options is equal to the
closing price on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of grant. The exercise price of nonstatutory
options may be set at a price other than the fair market value of the common stock.
On July 2, 2010, the Company granted each of its nine non-employee board members a stock
option exercisable for 10,000 shares of the Companys common stock with an exercise price per share
of $17.70, the per share closing price of the Companys common stock on NASDAQ on July 2, 2010.
These stock options will vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date.
10
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
5. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
January 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accrued warranty |
|
$ |
7,395 |
|
|
$ |
6,105 |
|
Accrued direct fulfillment costs |
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,836 |
|
Accrued rent |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
Accrued sales commissions |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
Accrued accounting fees |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
Accrued other |
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,363 |
|
|
$ |
14,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Obligations
Rental expense under operating leases for the three months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27,
2009 amounted to $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and for the six months ended July 3,
2010 and June 27, 2009 amounted to $1.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Future minimum
rental payments under operating leases were as follows as of July 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
1,323 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,459 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,254 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,087 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,087 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
11,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
21,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
Sales Taxes
The Company collects and remits sales tax in jurisdictions in which it has a physical presence
or it believes nexus exists, which therefore obligates the Company to collect and remit sales tax.
The Company continually evaluates whether it has established a nexus in new jurisdictions with
respect to sales tax. The Company has recorded a liability for potential exposure in several states
where there is uncertainty about the point in time at which the Company established a sufficient
business connection to create nexus. The Company continues to analyze possible sales tax exposure,
but does not currently believe that any individual claim or aggregate claims that might arise will
ultimately have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations
The Company enters into standard indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of
business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company indemnifies and agrees to reimburse the
indemnified party for losses incurred by the indemnified party, generally the Companys customers,
in connection with any patent, copyright, trade secret or other proprietary right infringement
claim by any third party with respect to the Companys products. The term of these indemnification
agreements is generally perpetual any time after execution of the agreement. The maximum potential
amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification
agreements is unlimited. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims
related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair
value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for
these agreements as of July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010, respectively.
Warranty
The Company provides warranties on most products and has established a reserve for warranty
based on identified or estimated warranty costs. The reserve is included as part of accrued
expenses (Note 5) in the accompanying balance sheets.
Activity related to the warranty accrual was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
6,840 |
|
|
$ |
4,984 |
|
|
$ |
6,105 |
|
|
$ |
5,380 |
|
Provision |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
Warranty usage(1) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
7,395 |
|
|
$ |
5,303 |
|
|
$ |
7,395 |
|
|
$ |
5,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Warranty usage includes the expiration of product warranties unutilized. |
7. Industry Segment, Geographic Information and Significant Customers
The Company operates in two reportable segments, the home robots division and government and
industrial division. The nature of products and types of customers for the two segments vary
significantly. As such, the segments are managed separately.
Home Robots
The Companys home robots division offers products to consumers through a network of retail
businesses throughout the United States, to certain countries through international distributors
and retailers, and through the Companys on-line store. The Companys home robots division includes
mobile robots used in the maintenance of domestic households.
Government and Industrial
The Companys government and industrial division offers products through a small U.S.
government-focused sales force, while products are sold to a limited number of countries, other
than the United States, through international distribution. The Companys government and industrial
robots are used by various U.S. and foreign governments, primarily for reconnaissance and bomb
disposal missions.
12
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
The table below presents segment information about revenue, cost of revenue, gross margin and
loss before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Robots |
|
$ |
52,904 |
|
|
$ |
34,099 |
|
|
$ |
105,451 |
|
|
$ |
66,922 |
|
Government & Industrial |
|
|
44,900 |
|
|
|
27,241 |
|
|
|
87,283 |
|
|
|
51,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
97,804 |
|
|
|
61,340 |
|
|
|
192,734 |
|
|
|
118,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Robots |
|
|
32,176 |
|
|
|
23,990 |
|
|
|
64,741 |
|
|
|
46,661 |
|
Government & Industrial |
|
|
31,658 |
|
|
|
20,941 |
|
|
|
61,306 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
63,834 |
|
|
|
44,931 |
|
|
|
126,047 |
|
|
|
85,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Robots |
|
|
20,728 |
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
40,710 |
|
|
|
20,261 |
|
Government & Industrial |
|
|
13,242 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
25,977 |
|
|
|
12,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
|
33,970 |
|
|
|
16,409 |
|
|
|
66,687 |
|
|
|
32,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
5,691 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
10,190 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
8,940 |
|
|
|
20,225 |
|
|
|
17,906 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9,313 |
|
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
17,789 |
|
|
|
14,495 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
8,425 |
|
|
$ |
(3,701 |
) |
|
$ |
18,552 |
|
|
$ |
(7,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Information
For the three months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009, sales to non-U.S. customers
accounted for 38.1% and 34.9% of total revenue, respectively, and for the six months ended July 3,
2010 and June 27, 2009, sales to non-U.S. customers accounted for 41.0% and 35.3% of total revenue,
respectively.
Significant Customers
For the three months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009, U.S. federal government orders,
contracts and subcontracts accounted for 42.5% and 37.5% of total revenue, respectively, and for
the six months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009, U.S. federal government orders, contracts and
subcontracts accounted for 39.8% and 36.9% of total revenue, respectively.
13
iROBOT CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(unaudited)
8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of the goodwill at July 3, 2010 of $7.9 million is from the acquisition of
Nekton Research, LLC completed in September 2008. In October 2009, the Company completed its annual
goodwill impairment test and did not identify any goodwill impairment.
Other intangible assets include the value assigned to completed technology, research
contracts, and a trade name. The estimated useful lives for all of these intangible assets are two
to ten years. The intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which is
consistent with the pattern that the economic benefits of the intangible assets are expected to be
utilized.
Intangible assets at July 3, 2010 and January 2, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 3, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Completed technology |
|
$ |
3,700 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
3,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,700 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
3,204 |
|
Research contracts |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Tradename |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
902 |
|
|
$ |
3,598 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
$ |
3,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets was $123,000 and $246,000 for the
three and six months ended July 3, 2010, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense
related to current intangible assets in the current fiscal year and each of the four succeeding
fiscal years is expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Remainder of 2010 |
|
$ |
234 |
|
2011 |
|
|
444 |
|
2012 |
|
|
444 |
|
2013 |
|
|
444 |
|
2014 |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of iRobot
Corporation should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited
financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 2, 2010, which has been filed with the SEC. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the
safe harbor created by those sections. In particular, statements contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, and in the documents incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to statements concerning new
product sales, product development and offerings, Roomba, Scooba, Looj and Verro products, PackBot
tactical military robots,the Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle, Seaglider, Negotiator, our home robot
and government and industrial robots divisions, our competition, our strategy, our market position,
market acceptance of our products, seasonal factors, revenue recognition, our profits, growth of
our revenues, composition of our revenues, our cost of revenues, operating expenses, selling and
marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses, and
compensation costs, our projected income tax rate, our credit facility and equipment facility, our
valuations of investments, valuation and composition of our stock-based awards, and liquidity,
constitute forward-looking statements and are made under these safe harbor provisions. Some of the
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as
believes, expects, may, will, should, could, seek, intends, plans, estimates,
anticipates, or other comparable terms. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, including those risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, as well as elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. We
urge you to consider the risks and uncertainties discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and in
Item 1A contained herein in evaluating our forward-looking statements. We have no plan to update
our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made.
Overview
iRobot designs and builds robots that make a difference. For over 20 years, we have developed
proprietary technology incorporating advanced concepts in navigation, mobility, manipulation and
artificial intelligence to build industry-leading robots. Our Roomba floor vacuuming robot and
Scooba floor washing robot perform time-consuming domestic chores in the home, while our Looj
gutter cleaning robot and Verro pool cleaning robot perform tasks outside the home. Our PackBot and
Small Unmanned Ground Vehicle (SUGV) tactical ground military robots perform battlefield
reconnaissance and bomb disposal. Our Negotiator ground robot performs multi-purpose tasks for
local police and first responders. Our 1Ka Seaglider unmanned underwater robot performs long
endurance oceanic missions. We sell our robots to consumers through a variety of distribution
channels, including chain stores and other national retailers, and through our on-line store, and
to the U.S. military and other government agencies worldwide. We maintain certifications for AS9100
and Capability Maturity Model Integration. These certifications enable us to service our military
products and services.
As of July 3, 2010, we had 613 full-time employees. We have developed expertise in the
disciplines necessary to build durable, high-performance and cost-effective robots through the
close integration of software, electronics and hardware. Our core technologies serve as reusable
building blocks that we adapt and expand to develop next generation and new products, reducing the
time, cost and risk of product development. Our significant expertise in robot design and
engineering, combined with our management teams experience in military and consumer markets,
positions us to capitalize on the expected growth in the market for robots.
Although we have successfully launched consumer and government and industrial products, our
continued success depends upon our ability to respond to a number of future challenges. We believe
the most significant of these challenges include increasing competition in the markets for both our
consumer and government and industrial products, our ability to obtain U.S. federal government
funding for research and development programs, and our ability to successfully develop and
introduce products and product enhancements.
15
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and
judgments, in particular those related to revenue recognition (specifically sales returns and other
allowances); valuation allowances; assumptions used in valuing stock-based compensation
instruments; evaluating loss contingencies; and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets.
Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates. Our management bases its estimates
and judgments on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amounts of revenue and expenses that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Additional information about these critical accounting
policies may be found in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2010.
Overview of Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of revenue for the
three and six month periods ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
|
87.9 |
% |
|
|
85.8 |
% |
|
|
89.3 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
Contract revenue |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
Cost of contract revenue |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
97,804 |
|
|
$ |
61,340 |
|
|
$ |
36,464 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
$ |
192,734 |
|
|
$ |
118,276 |
|
|
$ |
74,458 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
% |
Total revenue for the three months ended July 3, 2010 increased to $97.8 million, or 59.4%,
compared to $61.3 million for the three months ended June 27, 2009. Revenue increased approximately
$18.8 million, or 55.1%, in our home robots division and increased approximately $17.7 million, or
64.8%, in our government and industrial division.
16
The $18.8 million increase in revenue from our home robots division for the three months ended
July 3, 2010 was driven by a 53.1% increase in units shipped and a 5.2% increase in net average
selling price as compared to the three months ended June 27, 2009. Total home robots shipped in the
three months ended July 3, 2010 were 294,000 units compared to 192,000 units in the three months
ended June 27, 2009. The increase in home robot division revenue and units shipped was primarily
attributable to increased international sales of our home robot products resulting from our
increased efforts to expand our global presence. In the three months ended July 3, 2010,
international home robot revenue increased $16.0 million and domestic home robot revenue increased
$2.8 million as compared to the three months ended June 27, 2009. Home robot division revenue from
international customers was 67.6% of total home robot division revenue in the three month period
ending July 3, 2010 as compared to 57.9% in the three month period ended June 27, 2009.
The $17.7 million increase in revenue from our government and industrial division was driven
by a $9.5 million increase in government and industrial robot revenue, a $5.1 million increase in
product life cycle revenue (spare parts and accessories), and a $3.1 million increase in recurring
contract development revenue generated under research and development contracts. The $9.5 million
increase in government and industrial robots revenue was due to a 65.6% increase in units shipped
and a 2.1% increase in net average selling prices in the three month period ended July 3, 2010 as
compared to the three month period ended June 27, 2009. This increase in average selling price was
due to product mix primarily attributable to a significant number of SUGV 310 units shipped in the
three-month period ended July 3, 2010. The $5.1 million increase in product life cycle revenue is
the result of a higher installed base of our government and industrial robots which during the
three month period ended July 3, 2010 includes product life cycle revenue related to our SUGV 310
product. The $3.1 million increase in recurring contract development revenue generated under
research and development contracts was primarily attributable to an increase in funding of our SUGV
program. Total government and industrial robots shipped in the three months ended July 3, 2010 were
250 units compared to 151 units in the three months ended June 27, 2009.
Total revenue for the six months ended July 3, 2010 increased to $192.7 million, or 63.0%,
compared to $118.3 million for the six months ended June 27, 2009. Revenue increased approximately
$38.5 million, or 57.6%, in our home robots division and increased approximately $35.9 million, or
70.0%, in our government and industrial division.
The $38.5 million increase in revenue from our home robots division for the six months ended
July 3, 2010 was driven by a 54.9% increase in units shipped and a 5.4% increase in net average
selling price as compared to the six months ended June 27, 2009. Total home robots shipped in the
six months ended July 3, 2010 were 581,000 units compared to 375,000 units in the six months ended
June 27, 2009. The increase in home robot division revenue and units shipped was primarily
attributable to increased international sales of our home robot products resulting from our
increased efforts to expand our global presence. In the six months ended July 3, 2010,
international home robot revenue increased $34.9 million and domestic home robot revenue increased
$3.6 million as compared to the six months ended June 27, 2009. Home robot division revenue from
international customers was 68.5% of total home robot division revenue in the six month period
ending July 3, 2010 as compared to 55.7% in the six month period ended June 27, 2009.
The $35.9 million increase in revenue from our government and industrial division was driven
by a $22.6 million increase in government and industrial robot revenue, an $8.6 million increase in
product life cycle revenue (spare parts and accessories), and a $4.7 million increase in recurring
contract development revenue generated under research and development contracts. The $22.6 million
increase in government and industrial robots revenue was due to a 71.4% increase in units shipped
and an 8.6% increase in net average selling prices in the six month period ended July 3, 2010 as
compared to the six month period ended June 27, 2009. This increase in average selling price was
due to product mix primarily attributable to a significant number of SUGV 310 units shipped in the
six month period ending July 3, 2010. The $8.6 million increase in product life cycle revenue is
the result of a higher installed base of our government and industrial robots, which, during the
six month period ended July 3, 2010 included product life cycle revenue related to our SUGV 310
product. The $4.7 million increase in recurring contract development revenue generated under
research and development contracts was primarily attributable to an increase in funding of our SUGV
program. Total government and industrial robots shipped in the six months ended July 3, 2010 were
516 units compared to 301 units in the three months ended June 27, 2009.
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
$ |
63,834 |
|
|
$ |
44,931 |
|
|
$ |
18,903 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
$ |
126,047 |
|
|
$ |
85,661 |
|
|
$ |
40,386 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
% |
As a percentage of total
revenue |
|
|
65.3 |
% |
|
|
73.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
72.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Total cost of revenue increased to $63.8 million in the three months ended July 3, 2010,
compared to $44.9 million in the three months ended June 27, 2009. The increase is primarily due to
higher costs associated with the 53.1% increase in home robot units
shipped and the 65.6% increase
in government and industrial units shipped.
Total cost of revenue increased to $126.0 million in the six months ended July 3, 2010,
compared to $85.7 million in the six months ended June 27, 2009. The increase is primarily due to
higher costs associated with the 54.9% increase in home robot units
shipped and the 71.4% increase
in government and industrial units shipped.
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin |
|
$ |
33,970 |
|
|
$ |
16,409 |
|
|
$ |
17,561 |
|
|
|
107.0 |
% |
|
$ |
66,687 |
|
|
$ |
32,615 |
|
|
$ |
34,072 |
|
|
|
104.5 |
% |
As a percentage of
total revenue |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin increased $17.6 million, or 107.0%, to $34.0 million (34.7% of revenue) in the
three months ended July 3, 2010 from $16.4 million (26.8% of revenue) in the three months ended
July 27, 2009. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was the result of the home
robots division gross margin increasing 9.6 percentage points and the government and industrial
division gross margin increasing 6.4 percentage points. The 9.6 percentage point increase in the
home robots division is attributable to lower return provisions, the increase in units shipped
through our higher-margin international channel, price increases on certain international products,
continued product cost reduction efforts, lower excess and obsolete
inventory provisions, improved leverage
of our overhead expense against higher revenue, and lower warranty expense in the three month
period ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the three month period ended June 27, 2009. The 6.4
percentage point increase in the government and industrial division is primarily attributable to
leveraging our overhead expense against higher revenue in the three month period ended July 3, 2010
as compared to the three month period ended June 27, 2009.
Gross margin increased $34.1 million, or 104.5%, to $66.7 million (34.6% of revenue) in the
six months ended July 3, 2010 from $32.6 million (27.6% of revenue) in the six months ended June
27, 2009. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was the result of the home robots
division gross margin increasing 8.3 percentage points and the government and industrial division
gross margin increasing 5.7 percentage points. The 8.3 percentage point increase in the home robots
division is attributable to lower return provisions, the increase in units shipped through our
higher-margin international channel, price increases on certain international products, continued
product cost reduction efforts, lower excess and obsolete inventory provisions and improved leverage of our
overhead expense against higher revenue in the six month period ended July 3, 2010 as compared to
the six month period ended June 27, 2009. The 5.7 percentage point increase in the government and
industrial division is primarily attributable to leveraging our overhead expense against higher
revenue in the six month period ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the six month period ended June
27, 2009.
18
Research and Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total research
and development |
|
$ |
5,691 |
|
|
$ |
3,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,795 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
% |
|
$ |
10,190 |
|
|
$ |
7,474 |
|
|
$ |
2,716 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
As a percentage of
total revenue |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses increased by $1.8 million, or 46.1%, to $5.7 million (5.8%
of revenue) in the three months ended July 3, 2010 from $3.9 million (6.4% of revenue) for the
three months ended June 27, 2009. The increase in research and development expenses is primarily
due to increases in compensation, recruiting, materials and consulting costs associated with
internal research and development projects in our home robots division and expenses related to our
newly created healthcare business unit. The increase in our home robots division is primarily the
result of our increased efforts in the areas of product development and advanced development
relating to our consumer products.
Research and development expenses increased by $2.7 million, or 36.3%, to $10.2 million (5.3%
of revenue) in the six months ended July 3, 2010 from $7.5 million (6.3% of revenue) for the six
months ended June 27, 2009. The increase in research and development expenses is primarily due to
increases in compensation, recruiting, materials and consulting costs associated with internal
research and development projects in our home robots division and expenses related to our newly
created healthcare business unit. The increase in our home robots division is primarily the result
of our increased efforts in the areas of product development and advanced development relating to
our consumer products.
In addition to our research and development activities classified as research and development
expense, we incur research and development expenses under funded development arrangements with
governments and industrial third parties. For the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, these
expenses amounted to $8.0 million and $14.6 million compared to $7.8 million and $15.1 million for
the three and six months ended June 27, 2009. These expenses have been classified as cost of
revenue rather than research and development expense. The combined investment in future
technologies, classified as cost of revenue and research and development expense, was $13.7 million
and $24.8 million for the three and six months ended July 3, 2010, compared to $11.7 million and
$22.6 million for the three and six months ended June 27, 2009, respectively.
Selling and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total selling
and marketing |
|
$ |
10,581 |
|
|
$ |
8,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,641 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
$ |
20,225 |
|
|
$ |
17,906 |
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
As a percentage of
total revenue |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses increased by $1.6 million, or 18.4%, to $10.6 million (10.8% of
revenue) in the three months ended July 3, 2010 from $8.9 million (14.6% of revenue) in the three
months ended June 27, 2009. This was driven by an increase in our home robots division of $1.1
million attributable to increases in sales commission expenses as a result of higher sales and an
increase in marketing, compensation and employee-related expense supporting our international home
robot sales for the three months ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the three months ended June 27,
2009. Selling and marketing expenses in our government and industrial division increased by $0.4
million attributable to an increase in compensation expenses relating to bid and proposal
activities in the three months ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the three months ended June 27,
2009.
Selling and marketing expenses increased by $2.3 million, or 13.0%, to $20.2 million (10.5% of
revenue) in the six months ended July 3, 2010 from $17.9 million (15.1% of revenue) in the six
months ended June 27, 2009. This was driven by an increase in our home robots division of $1.6
million attributable to increases in sales commission expenses as a result of higher sales and an
increase in marketing, compensation and employee-related expense supporting our international home
robot sales for the six months ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the six months ended June 27,
2009. Selling and marketing expenses in our government and industrial division
19
increased by $0.8 million attributable to an increase in compensation expenses relating to bid
and proposal activities in the six months ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the six months ended
June 27, 2009.
General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative |
|
$ |
9,313 |
|
|
$ |
7,365 |
|
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
$ |
17,789 |
|
|
$ |
14,495 |
|
|
$ |
3,294 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
As a percentage of total revenue |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased by $1.9 million, or 26.4%, to $9.3 million (9.5%
of revenue) in the three months ended July 3, 2010 from $7.4 million (12.0% of revenue) in the
three months ended June 27, 2009. This increase is attributable to increased compensation, benefit
and recruiting expenses related to increased headcount and an increase in incentive compensation
expense and stock based compensation for the three months ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the
three months ended June 27, 2009.
General and administrative expenses increased by $3.3 million, or 22.7%, to $17.8 million
(9.2% of revenue) in the six months ended July 3, 2010 from $14.5 million (12.3% of revenue) in the
six months ended June 27, 2009. This increase is attributable to increased compensation, benefit
and recruiting expenses related to increased headcount and an increase in incentive compensation
expense and stock based compensation for the six months ended July 3, 2010 as compared to the six
months ended June 27, 2009.
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total other
income (expense),
net |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
|
(56.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
(208 |
) |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
133.2 |
% |
As a percentage of
total revenue |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net, amounted to $40,000 for the three months ended July 3, 2010
compared to $91,000 for the three months ended June 27, 2009. Other income (expense), net, for the
three month period ended July 3, 2010 was related to interest income of $0.2 million offset by
foreign currency exchange losses of $0.2 million resulting from foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations. Other income (expense), net, for the three month period ended June 27, 2009 was
directly related to foreign currency exchange losses resulting from foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations.
Other income (expense), net, amounted to $0.1 million for the six months ended July 3, 2010
compared to $(0.2) million for the six months ended June 27, 2009. Other income (expense), net, for
the six month period ended July 3, 2010 was related to interest income of $0.4 million offset by
foreign currency exchange losses of $0.3 million resulting from foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations. Other income (expense), net, for the six month period ended June 27, 2009 was
directly related to foreign currency exchange losses resulting from foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
June 27, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax
expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
3,111 |
|
|
$ |
(1,092 |
) |
|
$ |
4,203 |
|
|
|
(384.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
7,070 |
|
|
$ |
(3,072 |
) |
|
$ |
10,142 |
|
|
|
(330.1 |
)% |
As a percentage of
total revenue |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
In the three months ended July 3, 2010, we recorded a $3.1 million tax expense based on a
projected effective 2010 income tax rate of 38%. This $3.1 million expense compares to a $1.1
million tax benefit for the three months ended June 27, 2009 based on a projected effective 2009
income tax rate of 36%.
In the six months ended July 3, 2010, we recorded a $7.1 million tax expense based on a
projected effective 2010 income tax rate of 38%. This $7.1 million expense compares to a $3.1
million tax benefit for the six months ended June 27, 2009 based on a projected effective 2009
income tax rate of 36%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At July 3, 2010, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents totaling
$75.8 million, short-term investments of $23.0 million and accounts receivable of $27.1 million.
We manufacture and distribute our products through contract manufacturers and third-party
logistics providers. We believe that this approach gives us the advantages of relatively low
capital investment and significant flexibility in scheduling production and managing inventory
levels. By leasing our office facilities, we also minimize the cash needed for expansion.
Accordingly, our capital spending is generally limited to leasehold improvements, computers, office
furniture and product-specific production tooling, internal use software and test equipment. In the
six months ended July 3, 2010 and June 27, 2009, we spent $5.7 million and $2.4 million,
respectively, on capital equipment.
Our strategy for delivering products to our retail customers gives us the flexibility to
provide container shipments directly to the retailer from China and, alternatively, allows our
retail partners to take possession of product on a domestic basis. Accordingly, our home robots
product inventory consists of goods shipped to our third-party logistic providers for the
fulfillment of retail orders and direct-to-consumer sales. Our inventory of government and
industrial products is relatively low as they are generally built to order. Our contract
manufacturers are responsible for purchasing and stocking the majority of components required for
the production of our products, and they invoice us when the finished goods are shipped.
The balance of cash and short-term investments of $98.8 million at July 3, 2010 is primarily
the result of our significant focus over the past year on managing working capital. As of July 3,
2010, we did not have any borrowings outstanding under our existing working capital line of credit
and had $1.8 million letters of credit outstanding under our working capital line of credit.
Discussion of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended July 3, 2010 was $25.2
million, an increase of $13.3 million compared to the $11.9 million of net cash provided by
operating activities for the six months ended June 27, 2009. The increase in net cash provided by
operating activities was primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
An increase in cash of $15.9 million resulting from net
income of $11.5 million in 2010 versus a net loss of
$4.4 million in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
An increase in cash of $3.4 million resulting from a
decrease in accounts receivable of $8.0 million in 2010
versus a decrease of $4.6 million in 2009, primarily
attributable to aggressive collections and a reduction
in days sales outstanding; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $4.0 million resulting from a
decrease in accrued expenses of $3.4 million in 2010
versus an increase of $0.6 million in 2009, primarily
due to the disbursement of cash under our incentive
compensation plan; and |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash of $2.2 million resulting from a
decrease in deferred revenue of $1.9 million in 2010
compared to an increase of $0.3 million in 2009,
primarily attributable to a contract modification in
2010. |
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended July 3, 2010 was
$23.6 million, representing an increase of $21.2 million compared to the $2.4 million of net cash
used in investing activities for the six months ended June 27, 2009. This increase in net cash used
in investing activities was primarily driven by the following:
|
|
|
Purchase of investments of $25.4 million in 2010, partially
offset by the sale of investments of $7.5 million in 2010;
and |
21
|
|
|
The purchase of property and equipment of $5.7 million in
2010, compared to $2.4 million in 2009. |
Net cash provided from financing activities for six months ended July 3, 2010 was $2.4
million, an increase of $1.7 million compared to the $0.7 million of net cash provided by financing
activities for the six months ended June 27, 2009.
Working Capital Facility
We have an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., which is available
to fund working capital and other corporate purposes. The total amount available for borrowing
under our credit facility is $40.0 million. As of July 3, 2010, $38.2 million was available for
borrowing. The interest on loans under our credit facility will accrue, at our election, at either
(i) the greater of the BBA LIBOR Daily Floating Rate or the Prime Rate of Lender plus fifty (50)
basis points, or (ii) the LIBOR rate plus 2.00%. The credit facility will terminate and all amounts
outstanding thereunder will be due and payable in full on June 5, 2012.
As of July 3, 2010, we had letters of credit outstanding of $1.8 million under our working
capital line of credit. This credit facility contains customary terms and conditions for credit
facilities of this type, including restrictions on our ability to incur or guaranty additional
indebtedness, create liens, enter into transactions with affiliates, make loans or investments,
sell assets, pay dividends or make distributions on, or repurchase, our stock, and consolidate or
merge with other entities.
In addition, we are required to meet certain financial covenants customary with this type of
agreement, including maintaining a minimum specified tangible net worth, a minimum specified
adjusted EBITDA, and minimum specified interest coverage ratio.
This credit facility contains customary events of default, including for payment defaults,
breaches of representations, breaches of affirmative or negative covenants, cross defaults to other
material indebtedness, bankruptcy and failure to discharge certain judgments. If a default occurs
and is not cured within any applicable cure period or is not waived, our obligations under the
credit facility may be accelerated.
As of July 3, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.
Working Capital and Capital Expenditure Needs
We currently have no material cash commitments, except for normal recurring trade payables,
expense accruals and operating leases, all of which we anticipate funding through working capital,
funds provided by operating activities and our existing working capital line of credit. We do not
currently anticipate significant investment in property, plant and equipment, and we believe that
our outsourced approach to manufacturing provides us with flexibility in both managing inventory
levels and financing our inventory. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, cash provided by operating activities, and funds available through our working capital
line of credit will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs over at
least the next twelve months. In the event that our revenue plan does not meet our expectations, we
may eliminate or curtail expenditures to mitigate the impact on our working capital. Our future
capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the
expansion of our marketing and sales activities, the timing and extent of spending to support
product development efforts, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to
existing products, the acquisition of new capabilities or technologies, and the continuing market
acceptance of our products and services. Moreover, to the extent that existing cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, cash from operations, and cash from short-term borrowing are
insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or
private equity or debt financing. As part of our business strategy, we may consider additional
acquisitions of companies, technologies and products, which could also require us to seek
additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to us
or at all.
Contractual Obligations
We generally do not enter into binding purchase commitments. Our principal commitments consist
of obligations under our working capital line of credit, leases for office space and minimum
contractual obligations for services. The following table describes our commitments to settle
contractual obligations in cash as of July 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
2,596 |
|
|
$ |
4,483 |
|
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
|
$ |
10,089 |
|
|
$ |
21,343 |
|
Minimum contractual payments |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,421 |
|
Other obligations |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,831 |
|
|
$ |
15,297 |
|
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
|
$ |
10,089 |
|
|
$ |
35,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Our minimum contractual payments consist entirely of payments to our provider of direct
fulfillment services for direct to consumer sales of our home robots, which payments are incurred
in the ordinary course of business. Based on an analysis of actual and projected fees for 2010, we
expect there will be a shortfall between our actual transaction fees and our contractual minimum
fees. Expense accruals for the proportionate share of these expected shortfalls have been recorded
to selling and marketing expense in the three month and six month periods ended July 3, 2010. Other obligations
consist of software license and services agreement for our home robots division customer service
web support.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of July 3, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of
Regulation S-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Footnote 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued
accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity
At July 3, 2010, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $75.8 million and short term
investments of $23.0 million. The unrestricted cash and cash equivalents are held for working
capital purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Some of the
securities in which we invest, however, may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in
prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. To
minimize this risk in the future, we intend to maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents in a
variety of securities, commercial paper, money market funds, debt securities and certificates of
deposit. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe that we do not have any
material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes
in interest rates. As of July 3, 2010, all of our cash equivalents were held in money market
accounts.
Our exposure to market risk also relates to the increase or decrease in the amount of interest
expense we must pay on any outstanding debt instruments, primarily certain borrowings under our
working capital line of credit. The advances under the working capital line of credit bear a
variable rate of interest determined as a function of the prime rate or the LIBOR rate at the time
of the borrowing. At July 3, 2010, we had letters of credit outstanding of $1.8 million under our
working capital line of credit.
Exchange Rate Sensitivity
We maintain sales and business operations in foreign countries. As such, we have exposure to
adverse changes in exchange rates associated with operating expenses of our foreign operations, but
we believe this exposure to be immaterial. Additionally, we accept orders for home robot products
in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We regularly monitor the level of non-U.S. dollar
accounts receivable balances to determine if any actions, including possibly entering into foreign
currency forward contracts, should be taken to minimize the impact of fluctuating exchange rates on
our results of operations. Our international revenue is primarily denominated in U.S. dollars and
therefore any fluctuations in the Euro or any other non-U.S. dollar currencies will have minimal
direct impact on our international revenue. However, as the U.S. dollar strengthens or weakens
against other currencies, our international distributors may be impacted, which could affect their
profitability and our ability to maintain current pricing levels on our international consumer
products.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report were effective at a reasonable assurance level in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
discussions regarding required disclosure. We believe that a control system, no matter how well
designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system
23
are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time and in the ordinary course of business, we are subject to various claims,
charges and litigation. The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and some
lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to us, which could materially affect
our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A.Risk Factors
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks that could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future results, some of which are beyond our
control. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the risks and uncertainties
that we believe are most important for you to consider are discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us, which we currently deem immaterial or which are similar to
those faced by other companies in our industry or business in general, may also impair our business
operations. There are no material changes to the Risk Factors described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table sets forth the repurchases of our equity securities during the three months
ended July 3, 2010 by or on behalf of us or any affiliated purchaser:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
|
number |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Units) that May Yet |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Paid per |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
Share (or |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Unit) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
Fiscal month
beginning April 4,
2010 and ended May
1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal month
beginning May 2,
2010 and ended May
29, 2010 |
|
|
1,161 |
(1) |
|
$ |
19.27 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal month
beginning May 30,
2010 and ended July
3, 2010 |
|
|
4,763 |
(1) |
|
$ |
20.52 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,924 |
(1) |
|
$ |
20.28 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares of our common stock withheld by us to satisfy the minimum tax withholding
obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units held by executive
officers. |
|
(2) |
|
The amount represents the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global
Market on the applicable vesting date. |
|
(3) |
|
The amount represents the weighted average sale price of all shares of our common stock
repurchased during the three months ended July 3, 2010. |
24
Item 5. Other Information
On August 5, 2010, we promoted Joseph W. Dyer to Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Dyer, 63, has
served as President of our government and industrial robots division since July 2006, and as
Executive Vice President and General Manager of our government and industrial robots division from
September 2003 until July 2006. Prior to joining iRobot, Mr. Dyer served for 32 years in the U.S.
Navy. From July 2000 until July 2003, he served as Vice Admiral commanding the Naval Air Systems
Command at which he was responsible for research and development, procurement and in-service
support for naval aircraft, weapons and sensors. He is an elected fellow in the Society of
Experimental Test Pilots and the National Academy of Public Administration. He also chairs NASAs
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel. Mr. Dyer holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina
State University and an M.S. in Finance from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.
Our policy governing transactions in our securities by our directors, officers, and employees
permits our officers, directors, funds affiliated with our directors, and certain other persons to
enter into trading plans complying with Rule 10b5-l under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We have been advised that certain of our officers and directors (including Colin Angle,
Chief Executive Officer, Joseph Dyer, Chief Operating Officer, Glen
Weinstein, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary,
Alison Dean, Senior Vice President of corporate finance and Principal
Accounting Officer, Rodney Brooks, Director, and Helen
Greiner, Director) of the Company have entered into trading plans (each a Plan and collectively,
the Plans) covering periods after the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q in accordance
with Rule 10b5-l and our policy governing transactions in our securities. Generally, under these
trading plans, the individual relinquishes control over the transactions once the trading plan is
put into place. Accordingly, sales under these plans may occur at any time, including possibly
before, simultaneously with, or immediately after significant events involving our company.
We anticipate that, as permitted by Rule 10b5-l and our policy governing transactions in our
securities, some or all of our officers, directors and employees may establish trading plans in the
future. We intend to disclose the names of our executive officers and directors who establish a
trading plan in compliance with Rule 10b5-l and the requirements of our policy governing
transactions in our securities in our future quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We, however, undertake no obligation to update
or revise the information provided herein.
25
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
26
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iROBOT CORPORATION
|
|
Date: August 6, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ JOHN LEAHY
|
|
|
|
John Leahy |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer (Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer) |
|
27
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
28