e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8033
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in the Permian Basin Royalty Trust Indenture)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
|
|
75-6280532 |
of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
U.S. Trust, Bank of America
Private Wealth Management
Trust Department
901 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75202
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices; Zip Code)
(214) 209-2400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of Units of beneficial interest of the Trust outstanding at November 1, 2010:
46,608,796.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
The condensed financial statements included herein have been prepared by Bank of America, N.A. as
Trustee for the Permian Basin Royalty Trust, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations, although the Trustee believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements
and notes thereto be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the Trusts latest annual report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of the Trustee, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the
assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Permian Basin Royalty Trust at September 30, 2010, the
distributable income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
and the changes in trust corpus for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have
been included. The distributable income for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of
the distributable income for the full year.
The condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2010 and for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 included herein have been reviewed by Deloitte & Touche
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein.
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Unit Holders of Permian Basin Royalty Trust and
Bank of America, N.A., Trustee
Dallas, Texas
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of
Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust) as of September 30, 2010, the related condensed
statements of distributable income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 and changes in trust corpus for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and
2009. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the Trustee.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
As described in Note 1 to the condensed financial statements, these condensed financial statements
have been prepared on a modified cash basis of accounting, which is a comprehensive basis of
accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such
condensed interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with the basis of accounting
described in Note 1.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the statement of assets, liabilities, and trust corpus of Permian
Basin Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2009, and the related statements of distributable income and
changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated
March 1, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities, and trust
corpus as of December 31, 2009, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus from which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Austin, Texas
November 5, 2010
3
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments |
|
$ |
5,253,628 |
|
|
$ |
5,483,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net overriding royalty interests
in producing oil and gas properties
(net of accumulated amortization of
$9,979,762 and $9,895,230
at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively) |
|
|
995,454 |
|
|
|
1,079,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
6,249,082 |
|
|
$ |
6,563,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution payable to Unit holders |
|
$ |
5,253,628 |
|
|
$ |
5,483,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
Trust corpus 46,608,796 Units of
beneficial interest authorized and
outstanding |
|
|
995,454 |
|
|
|
1,079,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS |
|
$ |
6,249,082 |
|
|
$ |
6,563,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
NINE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Royalty income |
|
$ |
16,016,241 |
|
|
$ |
10,469,008 |
|
|
$ |
50,969,184 |
|
|
$ |
24,907,635 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,016,661 |
|
|
|
10,469,343 |
|
|
|
50,969,992 |
|
|
|
24,910,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
expenditures |
|
|
(124,056 |
) |
|
|
(135,642 |
) |
|
|
(987,391 |
) |
|
|
(1,065,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable income |
|
$ |
15,892,605 |
|
|
$ |
10,333,701 |
|
|
$ |
49,982,601 |
|
|
$ |
23,845,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable
income per Unit
(46,608,796 Units) |
|
$ |
.340979 |
|
|
$ |
.221711 |
|
|
$ |
1.072386 |
|
|
$ |
.511600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NINE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Trust corpus, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,079,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net overriding royalty interests |
|
|
(84,532 |
) |
|
|
(63,850 |
) |
Distributable income |
|
|
49,982,601 |
|
|
|
23,845,038 |
|
Distributions declared |
|
|
(49,982,601 |
) |
|
|
(23,845,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Trust Corpus, end of period |
|
$ |
995,454 |
|
|
$ |
1,106,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions per Unit |
|
$ |
1.072386 |
|
|
$ |
.511600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
6
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. |
|
BASIS OF ACCOUNTING |
|
|
|
The Permian Basin Royalty Trust (Trust) was established as of November 1, 1980. The net
overriding royalties conveyed to the Trust include: (1) a 75% net overriding royalty carved
out of Southland Royalty Companys fee mineral interests in the Waddell Ranch in Crane
County, Texas (the Waddell Ranch properties); and (2) a 95% net overriding royalty carved
out of Southland Royalty Companys major producing royalty interests in Texas (the Texas
Royalty properties). The net overriding royalty for the Texas Royalty properties is
subject to the provisions of the lease agreements under which such royalties were created.
The financial statements of the Trust are prepared on the following basis: |
|
|
|
Royalty income recorded for a month is the amount computed and paid to Bank of
America, N.A. (Trustee) as Trustee for the Trust by the interest owners: Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas Company LP (BROG), a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips for the Waddell
Ranch properties and Riverhill Energy Corporation (Riverhill Energy), formerly a
wholly owned subsidiary of Riverhill Capital Corporation (Riverhill Capital) and
formerly an affiliate of Coastal Management Corporation (CMC), for the Texas Royalty
properties. Schlumberger Technology Corporation (STC) currently conducts all field,
technical and accounting operations on behalf of BROG with regard to the Waddell Ranch
properties. Riverhill Energy currently conducts the accounting operations for the
Texas Royalty properties. Royalty income consists of the amounts received by the owners
of the interest burdened by the net overriding royalty interests (Royalties) from the
sale of production less accrued production costs, development and drilling costs,
applicable taxes, operating charges, and other costs and deductions multiplied by 75%
in the case of the Waddell Ranch properties and 95% in the case of the Texas Royalty
properties. |
|
|
|
|
As was previously reported, in February 1997, BROG sold its interest in the Texas
Royalty properties to Riverhill Energy. |
|
|
|
|
The Trustee has been advised that in the first quarter of 1998, STC acquired all of
the shares of stock of Riverhill Capital. Prior to such acquisition by STC, CMC and
Riverhill Energy were wholly owned subsidiaries of Riverhill Capital. The Trustee
has further been advised that in connection with STCs acquisition of Riverhill
Capital, the shareholders of Riverhill Capital acquired ownership of
all of the shares of stock of Riverhill Energy. Thus, the ownership in the Texas Royalty
properties referenced above remained in Riverhill Energy, the stock ownership of
which was acquired by the former shareholders of Riverhill Capital. |
|
|
|
|
In 2007 the Bank of America private wealth management group officially became known
as U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management. The legal entity that
serves as Trustee of the Trust did not change, and references in this |
7
|
|
|
Form 10-Q to U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management shall describe
the legal entity Bank of America, N.A. |
|
|
|
|
Trust expenses recorded are based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established
out of cash received or borrowed funds for liabilities and contingencies. |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Unit holders are recorded when declared by the Trustee. |
|
|
|
|
Royalty income is computed separately for each of the conveyances under which the
Royalties were conveyed to the Trust. If monthly costs exceed revenues for any
conveyance (excess costs), such excess costs cannot reduce royalty income from other
conveyances, but is carried forward with accrued interest to be recovered from future
net proceeds of that conveyance. |
|
|
The financial statements of the Trust differ from financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) because revenues are not accrued in the month of production and certain cash
reserves may be established for contingencies which would not be accrued in financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Amortization of the Royalties calculated on a
unit-of-production basis is charged directly to trust corpus. This comprehensive basis of
accounting other than GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic
12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts. |
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which changes how a company determines when an entity that
is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based
on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This
guidance was effective for the Trust on January 1, 2010 and the adoption did not have an impact on
the Trusts financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the basis of accounting described above
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as of and for the reporting period. Actual results may
differ from such estimates.
2. |
|
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
For federal income tax purposes, the Trust constitutes a fixed investment trust which is
taxed as a grantor trust. A grantor trust is not subject to tax at the trust level. The
Unit holders are considered to own the Trusts income and principal as though no trust were
in existence. The income of the Trust is deemed to have been received or accrued by each |
8
|
|
Unit holder at the time such income is received or accrued by the Trust and not when
distributed by the Trust. |
|
|
|
The Royalties constitute economic interests in oil and gas properties for federal income
tax purposes. Unit holders must report their share of the revenues from the Royalties as
ordinary income from oil and gas royalties and are entitled to claim depletion with respect
to such income. |
|
|
|
The Trust has on file technical advice memoranda confirming the tax treatment described
above. |
|
|
|
The classification of the Trusts income for purposes of the passive loss rules may be
important to a Unit holder. Royalty income generally is treated as portfolio income and
does not offset passive losses. |
|
|
|
Some Trust Units are held by middlemen, as such term is broadly defined in U.S. Treasury
Regulations (and includes custodians, nominees, certain joint owners, and brokers holding an
interest for a custodian in street name, collectively referred to herein as middlemen).
Therefore, the Trustee considers the Trust to be a non-mortgage widely held fixed investment
trust (WHFIT) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private
Wealth Management, EIN: 56-0906609, 901 Main Street, 17th Floor, Dallas, Texas 75202,
telephone number (214) 209-2400, is the representative of the Trust that will provide tax
information in accordance with applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations governing the
information reporting requirements of the Trust as a WHFIT. Tax information is also posted
by the Trustee at www.pbt-permianbasintrust.com. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
middlemen holding Trust Units on behalf of Unit holders, and not the Trustee of the Trust,
are solely responsible for complying with the information reporting requirements under the
U.S. Treasury Regulations with respect to such Trust Units, including the issuance of IRS
Forms 1099 and certain written tax statements. Unit holders whose Trust Units are held by
middlemen should consult with such middlemen regarding the information that will be reported
to them by the middlemen with respect to the Trust Units. |
|
|
|
Unit holders should consult their tax advisors regarding Trust tax compliance matters. |
3. |
|
STATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
|
All revenues from the Trust are from sources within Texas, which has no individual income
tax. However, Texas imposes a margin tax on generally all entity types providing limited
liability protection at a rate of 1% on gross revenues less certain deductions as
specifically set forth in the Texas margin tax statute. Entities subject to tax generally
include trusts unless otherwise exempt. Trusts that receive at least 90% of their federal
gross income from designated passive sources, including royalties from mineral properties
and other non-operated mineral interest income, and do not receive more than 10% of their
income from operating an active trade or business, generally are exempt from the Texas
margin tax as passive entities. The Trust should be exempt from Texas margin tax as a
passive entity. Since the Trust should be exempt from Texas margin tax at the Trust level
as a passive entity, each Unit holder that is considered a taxable |
9
|
|
entity under the Texas margin tax will generally be required to include its portion of Trust
revenues in its own Texas margin tax computation. This revenue is sourced to Texas under
provisions of the Texas Administrative Code that provide such income is sourced according to
the principal place of business of the Trust, which is Texas. |
|
|
|
Each Unit holder is urged to consult his own tax advisor regarding the requirements for
filing state tax returns. |
4. |
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
|
|
|
Subsequent to September 30, 2010, the Trust declared a distribution on October 19, 2010 of
$0.107227 per Unit payable on November 15, 2010, to Unit holders of record on October 29,
2010. |
5. |
|
CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
Contingencies related to the Underlying Properties that are unfavorably resolved would generally
be reflected by the Trust as reductions to future royalty income payments to the Trust with
corresponding reductions to cash distributions to Unit holders. The Trustee is aware of no such
items as of September 30, 2010. |
* * * * *
Item 2. Trustees Discussion and Analysis
Forward Looking Information
Certain information included in this report contains, and other materials filed or to be filed by
the Trust with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information included in oral
statements or other written statements made or to be made by the Trust) may contain or include,
forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Such forward looking
statements may be or may concern, among other things, capital expenditures, drilling activity,
development activities, production efforts and volumes, hydrocarbon prices and the results thereof,
and regulatory matters. Although the Trustee believes that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, such expectations are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties and the Trustee can give no assurance that they will prove correct. There are many
factors, none of which are within the Trustees control, that may cause such expectations not to be
realized, including, among other things, factors such as actual oil and gas prices and the
recoverability of reserves, capital expenditures, general economic conditions, actions and policies
of petroleum-producing nations and other changes in the domestic and international energy markets.
Such forward looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as estimate, expect,
predict, anticipate, goal, should, assume, believe, or other words that convey the
uncertainty of future events or outcomes.
10
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, royalty income received by the Trust amounted to
$16,016,241 compared to royalty income of $10,469,008 during the third quarter of 2009. The
increase in royalty income is primarily attributable to increases in both oil and gas prices.
Interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, was $420 compared to $335 during the
third quarter of 2009. The increase in interest income is primarily attributable to more funds
available for investment, offset by lower interest rates. General and administrative expenses
during the third quarter of 2010 amounted to $124,056 compared to $135,642 during the third quarter
of 2009. The decrease in general and administrative expenses can be primarily attributed to
decreased professional expenses.
These transactions resulted in distributable income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of
$15,892,605 or $.340979 per Unit of beneficial interest. Distributions of $.116351, $.111909 and
$.112717 per Unit were made to Unit holders of record as of July 30, 2010, August 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2010, respectively. For the third quarter of 2009, distributable income was
$10,333,701, or $.221711 per Unit of beneficial interest.
Royalty income for the Trust for the third quarter of the calendar year is associated with actual
oil and gas production for the period of May, June and July 2010 from the properties from which the
Trusts net overriding royalty interests (Royalties) were carved. Oil and gas sales attributable
to the Royalties and the properties from which the Royalties were carved are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales (Bbls) |
|
|
168,282 |
|
|
|
138,420 |
|
Gas sales (Mcf) |
|
|
763,886 |
|
|
|
588,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales From Which The Royalties Were
Carved: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil sales (Bbls) |
|
|
256,478 |
|
|
|
266,797 |
|
Average per day (Bbls) |
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
Average price per Bbl |
|
$ |
69.56 |
|
|
$ |
59.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gas sales (Mcf) |
|
|
1,318,837 |
|
|
|
1,474,200 |
|
Average per day (Mcf) |
|
|
14,335 |
|
|
|
16,024 |
|
Average price per Mcf |
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
$ |
4.48 |
|
The average received price of oil increased to an average price per barrel of $69.56 Bbl in
the third quarter of 2010, compared to $59.65 per Bbl in the third quarter of 2009 due to worldwide
market variables. The Trustee has been advised by ConocoPhillips that for the period of August 1,
1993, through September 30, 2010, the oil from the Waddell Ranch properties was being sold
11
under a competitive bid to a third party. The average price of gas increased from $4.48 per Mcf in
the third quarter of 2009 to $6.45 per Mcf in the third quarter of 2010 due to change in overall
market variables.
Since the oil and gas sales attributable to the Royalties are based on an allocation formula that
is dependent on such factors as price and cost (including capital expenditures), the production
amounts in the Royalties section of the above table do not provide a meaningful comparison. Oil
sales volumes decreased and gas sales volumes decreased from the Underlying Properties (as defined
in the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009) for the applicable
period in 2010 compared to 2009.
Capital expenditures for drilling, remedial and maintenance activities on the Waddell Ranch
properties during the third quarter of 2010 totaled $366,440 as
compared to $3,881,031 for the Trust
for the third quarter of 2009. ConocoPhillips has informed the Trustee that the 2010 capital
expenditures budget has been revised to $22 million (gross) for the Waddell Ranch properties. The
total amount of capital expenditures for 2009 was $24.1 million. Through the third quarter of
2010, capital expenditures of $4.3 million (gross) have been expended.
The Trustee has been advised that there were 0 wells completed and 1
drill well in progress, and 2 workover wells completed and 13 workover wells in progress, during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to 3 wells completed, 2 drill wells in progress, and 12 workover
wells completed and 1 workover well in progress for the three months ended September 30, 2009 on
the Waddell Ranch properties. There were 0 facility projects completed and 14 projects in progress
for the third quarter of 2010.
Lease operating expenses and property taxes totaled $4.7 million for the third quarter of 2010,
compared to $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 on the Waddell Ranch properties.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, royalty income received by the Trust amounted to
$50,969,184 compared to royalty income of $24,907,635 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The increase in royalty income is primarily due to an increase in oil and gas prices in the first
nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months in 2009. Interest income for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was $808 compared to $3,017 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The decrease in interest income is attributable primarily to significantly lowered interest rates.
General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $987,391.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, general and administrative expenses were
$1,065,614. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to reduced
professional expenses.
These transactions resulted in distributable income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of
$49,982,601, or $1.072386 per Unit. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, distributable
income was $23,845,038, or $.511600 per Unit.
Royalty income for the Trust for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is associated with actual
oil and gas production for the period November 2009 through July 2010 from the properties from
which the Royalties were carved. Oil and gas production attributable to the Royalties and the
properties from which the Royalties were carved are as follows:
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Royalties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales (Bbls) |
|
|
506,837 |
|
|
|
390,775 |
|
Gas sales (Mcf) |
|
|
2,292,284 |
|
|
|
1,579,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties From Which The Royalties Were
Carved: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil sales (Bbls) |
|
|
776,746 |
|
|
|
813,511 |
|
Average per day (Bbls) |
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
Average price per Bbl |
|
$ |
72.91 |
|
|
$ |
46.66 |
|
Gas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gas sales (Mcf) |
|
|
3,958,768 |
|
|
|
4,300,963 |
|
Average per day (Mcf) |
|
|
14,501 |
|
|
|
15,754 |
|
Average price per Mcf |
|
$ |
6.95 |
|
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
The average received price of oil increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to
$72.91 per barrel compared to $46.66 per barrel for the same period in 2009. The increase in the
average price of oil is primarily due to worldwide market variables. The increase in the average
price of gas from $4.44 per Mcf for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $6.95 per Mcf for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is primarily the result of an increase in the spot prices
of natural gas. This average price for gas also includes significant prices for natural gas liquids which raises this average price of gas well
above the average posted price of natural gas.
Since the oil and gas sales volumes attributable to the Royalties are based on an allocation
formula that is dependent on such factors as price and cost (including capital expenditures), the
production amounts in the Royalties section of the above table do not provide a meaningful
comparison. The oil and gas sales volumes from the properties from which the Royalties are carved
have declined for the applicable period of 2010 compared to 2009.
Capital expenditures for the Waddell Ranch properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
totaled $1.6 million compared to $9.3 million net to the Trust for the same period in 2009.
ConocoPhillips has previously advised the Trust that the remaining 2010 capital expenditures budget
for the Waddell Ranch properties is $17.7 million (gross).
The Trustee has been advised that 0 wells were drilled and completed and 1 well to be completed on
the Waddell Ranch properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to 9
wells drilled and completed and 2 wells to be completed on the Waddell Ranch properties during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. Approximately 2 workover wells were completed and
approximately 13 workover wells were in progress as of September 30, 2010. Approximately 0
facilities projects were completed and 14 facilities projects were in progress.
Lease operating expense and property taxes totaled $12.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to $11.4 million for the same period in 2009. The increase in lease
operating expense is primarily attributable to a increased maintenance work.
13
Calculation of Royalty Income
The Trusts royalty income is computed as a percentage of the net profit from the operation of the
properties in which the Trust owns net overriding royalty interests. These percentages of net
profits are 75% and 95% in the case of the Waddell Ranch properties and the Texas Royalty
properties, respectively. Royalty income received by the Trust for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were computed as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
WADDELL |
|
|
TEXAS |
|
|
WADDELL |
|
|
TEXAS |
|
|
|
RANCH |
|
|
ROYALTY |
|
|
RANCH |
|
|
ROYALTY |
|
|
|
PROPERTIES |
|
|
PROPERTIES |
|
|
PROPERTIES |
|
|
PROPERTIES |
|
Gross proceeds of sales from
the Underlying Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil proceeds |
|
$ |
12,343,193 |
|
|
$ |
5,496,900 |
|
|
$ |
11,136,482 |
|
|
$ |
4,778,476 |
|
Gas proceeds |
|
|
7,333,630 |
|
|
|
1,168,823 |
|
|
|
5,836,377 |
|
|
|
775,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
19,676,823 |
|
|
|
6,665,723 |
|
|
|
16,972,859 |
|
|
|
5,553,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
491,195 |
|
|
|
177,759 |
|
|
|
434,136 |
|
|
|
173,940 |
|
Gas |
|
|
363,863 |
|
|
|
68,120 |
|
|
|
330,079 |
|
|
|
45,387 |
|
Lease operating expense and
property tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas |
|
|
4,776,138 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
4,669,575 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
366,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,881,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,997,637 |
|
|
|
605,879 |
|
|
|
9,314,821 |
|
|
|
579,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profits |
|
|
13,679,186 |
|
|
|
6,059,844 |
|
|
|
7,658,038 |
|
|
|
4,974,189 |
|
Net overriding royalty interests |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty income |
|
$ |
10,259,389 |
|
|
$ |
5,756,852 |
|
|
$ |
5,743,529 |
|
|
$ |
4,725,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Trusts financial statements reflect the selection and application of accounting policies that
require the Trust to make significant estimates and assumptions. The following are some of the
more critical judgment areas in the application of accounting policies that currently affect the
Trusts financial condition and results of operations.
Basis of Accounting
The financial statements of the Trust are prepared on a modified cash basis and are not intended to
present financial positions and results of operations in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Preparation of the Trusts financial
statements on such basis includes the following:
14
|
|
|
Royalty income and interest income are recorded in the period in which amounts are
received by the Trust rather than in the period of production and accrual, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses recorded are based on liabilities paid and cash
reserves established out of cash received. |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of the royalty interests is calculated on a unit-of-production basis and
charged directly to trust corpus when revenues are received. |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Unit holders are recorded when declared by the Trustee (see Note 1 to
the Financial Statements). |
The financial statements of the Trust differ from financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America because royalty income is
not accrued in the period of production, general and administrative expenses recorded are based on
liabilities paid and cash reserves established rather than on accrual basis, and amortization of
the royalty interests is not charged against operating results. This comprehensive basis of
accounting other than GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial
Statements of Royalty Trusts.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which changes how a company determines when an entity that
is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based
on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This
guidance was effective for the Trust on January 1, 2010 and the adoption did not have an impact on
the Trusts financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the royalty interests are recognized in the period in which amounts are received by
the Trust. Royalty income received by the Trust in a given calendar year will generally reflect
the proceeds, on an entitlement basis, from natural gas produced and sold for the twelve-month
period ended October 31st in that calendar year. Royalty income received by the Trust in the third
quarter of 2010 generally reflects the proceeds associated with actual oil and gas production for
the period of May, June and July 2010.
Reserve Disclosure
As of January 1, 2010, independent petroleum engineers estimated the net proved reserves
attributable to the royalty interests. Estimates of future net revenues from proved reserves have
been prepared using average 12-month oil and gas prices, determined as an unweighted arithmetic
average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period preceding the
end of the most recent fiscal year, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements.
Numerous uncertainties are inherent in estimating volumes and the value of
15
proved reserves and in projecting future production rates and the timing of development of
non-producing reserves.
Such reserve estimates are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The
reserves actually recovered and the timing of production may be substantially different from the
reserves estimates.
Contingencies
Contingencies related to the Underlying Properties that are unfavorably resolved would generally be
reflected by the Trust as reductions to future royalty income payments to the Trust with
corresponding reductions to cash distributions to Unit holders. The Trustee is aware of no such
items as of September 30, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the basis of accounting described above
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as of and for the reporting period. Actual results may
differ from such estimates.
New Securities and Exchange Commission Rule
In December 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) released Final Rule,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. The new disclosure requirements include provisions that
permit the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those technologies have been
demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable conclusions about reserves volumes. The new
requirements also allow companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors.
In addition, the new disclosure requirements require companies to: (a) report the independence and
qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (b) file reports when a third party is relied
upon to prepare reserves estimates or conducts a reserves audit; and (c) report oil and gas
reserves using an average price based upon the prior 12-month period rather than year-end prices.
The new disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending on
or after December 31, 2009. The effect of adopting the SEC rules did not have a significant effect
on our reported financial position or distributable income.
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the Trusts market risk, as disclosed in the Trusts Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Trustee carried out an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Trustee
concluded that the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording,
processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by
the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
16
are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports
that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated
to the Trustee to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In its evaluation of
disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustee has relied, to the extent considered reasonable, on
information provided by Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP, the owner of the Waddell Ranch
properties, and Riverhill Energy Corporation, the owner of the Texas Royalty properties. There has
not been any change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.
17
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1 through 5.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Permian Basin Royalty Trust Indenture dated November 3, 1980,
between Southland Royalty Company (now Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company
LP) and The First National Bank of Fort Worth (now Bank of America, N.A.), as
Trustee, heretofore filed as Exhibit (4)(a) to the Trusts Annual Report on
Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1980 is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Net Overriding Royalty Conveyance (Permian Basin Royalty Trust)
from Southland Royalty Company (now Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP)
to The First National Bank of Fort Worth (now Bank of America, N.A.), as
Trustee, dated November 3, 1980 (without Schedules), heretofore filed as
Exhibit (4)(b) to the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1980 is incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Net Overriding Royalty Conveyance (Permian Basin Royalty Trust
- Waddell Ranch) from Southland Royalty Company (now Burlington Resources Oil &
Gas Company LP) to The First National Bank of Fort Worth (now Bank of America,
N.A.), as Trustee, dated November 3, 1980 (without Schedules), heretofore filed
as Exhibit (4)(c) to the Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities
and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1980 is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 21, 2004 by and
between Burlington Resources, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., as trustee of
Permian Basin Royalty Trust, heretofore filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trusts
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated December 15, 2005 among the
Permian Basin Royalty Trust, Burlington Resources, Inc., Burlington Resources
Oil & Gas L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as
representatives of the several underwriters, heretofore filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Trusts current report on Form 8-K to the Securities and Exchange
Commission filed on December 19, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference. |
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated August 2, 2005 among the Permian
Basin Royalty Trust, Burlington Resources, Inc., Burlington Resources Oil & Gas
L.P. and Goldman Sachs & Co. and Lehman Brothers Inc. as representatives of the
several underwriters, heretofore filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trusts current
report on Form 8-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission filed on August 8,
2005, is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated August 17, 2006, among Permian
Basin Royalty Trust, ConocoPhillips, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP
and Lehman Brothers Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as representatives
of the several underwriters heretofore filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trusts
current report on Form 8-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission filed on
August 22, 2006, is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification by Ron E. Hooper, Senior Vice President and Trust
Administrator of Bank of America, Trustee of Permian Basin Royalty Trust, dated
November 5, 2010 and submitted pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) and
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certificate by Bank of America, Trustee of Permian Basin Royalty Trust, dated November 5, 2010
and submitted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350). |
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
TRUSTEE FOR THE
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ RON E. HOOPER
|
|
|
|
Ron E. Hooper, |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Trust Administrator
Bank of America, N.A. |
|
|
Date: November 5, 2010
(The Trust has no directors or executive officers.)
20
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
4.1
|
|
Permian Basin Royalty Trust Indenture dated November 3,
1980, between Southland Royalty Company (now Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas Company LP) and The First National Bank
of Fort Worth (now Bank of America, N.A.), as Trustee,
heretofore filed as Exhibit (4)(a) to the Trusts Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1980 is
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Net Overriding Royalty Conveyance (Permian Basin Royalty
Trust) from Southland Royalty Company (now Burlington
Resources Oil & Gas Company LP) to The First National Bank
of Fort Worth (now Bank of America, N.A.), as Trustee,
dated November 3, 1980 (without Schedules), heretofore
filed as Exhibit (4)(b) to the Trusts Annual Report on
Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1980 is incorporated herein
by reference.* |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Net Overriding Royalty Conveyance (Permian Basin Royalty
Trust Waddell Ranch) from Southland Royalty Company (now
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP) to The First
National Bank of Fort Worth (now Bank of America, N.A.), as
Trustee, dated November 3, 1980 (without Schedules),
heretofore filed as Exhibit (4)(c) to the Trusts Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1980 is
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 21, 2004 by
and between Burlington Resources, Inc. and Bank of America,
N.A., as trustee of Permian Basin Royalty Trust, heretofore
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trusts Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 is incorporated herein
by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated December 15, 2005 among the
Permian Basin Royalty Trust, Burlington Resources, Inc.,
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas L.P. and Lehman Brothers
Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as representatives
of the several underwriters, heretofore filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Trusts current report on Form 8-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission filed on December 19,
2005, is incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated August 2, 2005 among the
Permian Basin Royalty Trust, Burlington Resources, Inc.,
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas L.P. and Goldman Sachs & Co.
and Lehman Brothers Inc. as representatives of the several
underwriters, heretofore filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Trusts current report on Form 8-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission filed on August 8, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference.* |
21
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
10.4
|
|
Underwriting Agreement dated August 17, 2006, among Permian
Basin Royalty Trust, ConocoPhillips, Burlington Resources
Oil & Gas Company LP and Lehman Brothers Inc. and Wachovia
Capital Markets, LLC as representatives of the several
underwriters heretofore filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Trusts current report on Form 8-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission filed on August 22, 2006, is
incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Ron E. Hooper, Senior Vice President and
Trust Administrator of Bank of America, Trustee of Permian
Basin Royalty Trust, dated November 5, 2010 and submitted
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) and pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certificate by Bank of America, Trustee of Permian Basin
Royalty Trust, dated November 5, 2010 and submitted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350). |
|
|
|
* |
|
A copy of this Exhibit is available to any Unit holder, at the actual cost of
reproduction, upon written request to the Trustee, U.S. Trust, Bank of America
Private Wealth Management, 901 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75202. |
22