Mastec, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
Commission File Number 001-08106
MASTEC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in Its charter)
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
65-0829355 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
800 S. Douglas Road,
12th Floor, Coral Gables, FL
|
|
33134 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (305) 599-1800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
o Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
As
of August 1, 2006, MasTec, Inc. had 64,997,837 shares of common stock, $0.10 par
value, outstanding.
MASTEC, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
232,100 |
|
|
$ |
209,660 |
|
|
$ |
450,852 |
|
|
$ |
403,636 |
|
Costs of revenue, excluding depreciation |
|
|
198,125 |
|
|
|
182,435 |
|
|
|
390,082 |
|
|
|
359,512 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
8,714 |
|
General and administrative expenses, including non-cash stock
compensation expense of $2,043 and $3,224,
respectively, in 2006 and $182 and $211, respectively, in
2005 |
|
|
17,373 |
|
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
33,968 |
|
|
|
28,876 |
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
4,710 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
9,566 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before minority interest |
|
|
12,402 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
15,877 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
12,079 |
|
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
15,683 |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit of $0
in 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
(35,736 |
) |
|
|
(4,043 |
) |
|
|
(43,564 |
) |
|
|
(10,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(23,657 |
) |
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
$ |
(27,881 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.56 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.70 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total basic net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.37 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
64,752 |
|
|
|
48,894 |
|
|
|
62,021 |
|
|
|
48,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
66,463 |
|
|
|
49,431 |
|
|
|
63,715 |
|
|
|
48,795 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Audited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
62,555 |
|
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
Accounts receivable, unbilled revenue and retainage, net |
|
|
167,276 |
|
|
|
171,832 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
21,928 |
|
|
|
17,832 |
|
Income tax refund receivable |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
35,848 |
|
|
|
42,442 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
49,388 |
|
|
|
69,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
337,680 |
|
|
|
305,307 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
57,476 |
|
|
|
48,027 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
150,630 |
|
|
|
127,143 |
|
Deferred taxes, net |
|
|
45,946 |
|
|
|
51,468 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
50,352 |
|
|
|
46,070 |
|
Long-term assets held for sale |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
643,111 |
|
|
$ |
584,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,266 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
79,803 |
|
|
|
90,324 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
46,742 |
|
|
|
45,549 |
|
Current liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
|
29,460 |
|
|
|
30,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
157,063 |
|
|
|
170,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
36,343 |
|
|
|
37,359 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
126,961 |
|
|
|
196,104 |
|
Long-term liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
321,109 |
|
|
|
404,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; authorized shares
5,000,000; issued and outstanding shares none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $0.10 par value authorized shares
100,000,000; issued and outstanding shares
64,990,961 and 49,222,013 shares in 2006 and
2005, respectively |
|
|
6,499 |
|
|
|
4,922 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
524,776 |
|
|
|
356,131 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(209,781 |
) |
|
|
(181,900 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
322,002 |
|
|
|
179,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
643,111 |
|
|
$ |
584,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(27,881 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,898 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,796 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
20,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock and restricted stock compensation expense |
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
(Gain) on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(2,239 |
) |
Write down of fixed assets |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Provision
for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Income from equity investment |
|
|
(1,563 |
) |
|
|
(562 |
) |
Accrued losses on construction projects |
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, unbilled revenue and retainage, net |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
(14,108 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
Income tax refund receivable |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
Other assets, current and non-current portion |
|
|
14,463 |
|
|
|
(6,559 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(14,790 |
) |
|
|
1,310 |
|
Other liabilities, current and non-current portion |
|
|
(1,689 |
) |
|
|
(10,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
10,392 |
|
|
|
(14,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows (used in) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
(19,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(10,273 |
) |
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
Payments received from sub-leases |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated companies |
|
|
(2,830 |
) |
|
|
(2,411 |
) |
Investments in life insurance policies |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(30,771 |
) |
|
|
(1,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
156,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of other borrowings, net |
|
|
(3,801 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
Payments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
Payments of senior subordinated notes |
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock pursuant to stock option exercises |
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
Payments of financing costs |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
80,858 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
60,479 |
|
|
|
(14,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of currency translation on cash |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
19,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
|
$ |
62,555 |
|
|
$ |
4,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
8,945 |
|
|
$ |
8,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease |
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Auction receivable |
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated companies payable in July |
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
925 |
|
Accruals for inventory at quarter-end |
|
$ |
6,288 |
|
|
$ |
18,404 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of the Business
MasTec, Inc. (collectively, with its subsidiaries, MasTec or the Company) is a leading
specialty contractor operating mainly throughout the United States and Canada across a range of
industries. The Companys core activities are the building, installation, maintenance and upgrade
of communications and utility infrastructure and transportation systems. The Companys primary
customers are in the following industries: communications (including satellite television and
cable television), utilities and government. The Company provides similar infrastructure services
across the industries it serves. Customers rely on MasTec to build and maintain infrastructure and
networks that are critical to their delivery of voice, video and data communications, electricity
and transportation systems. MasTec is organized as a Florida corporation and its fiscal year ends
December 31. MasTec or its predecessors have been in business for over 70 years.
Note 2 Basis for Presentation
The accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements for MasTec have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for
interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all information and notes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements and
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the
periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the periods presented are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full
fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. For the Company, key estimates
include the recognition of revenue for costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings,
allowance for doubtful accounts, accrued self-insured claims, the fair value of goodwill and
intangible assets, asset lives used in computing depreciation and amortization, including
amortization of intangibles, and accounting for income taxes, contingencies and litigation. While
the Company believes that such estimates are fair when considered in conjunction with the
consolidated financial position and results of operations taken as a whole, actual results could
differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
Note 3 Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying financial statements include MasTec, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The Company
consolidates GlobeTec Construction, LLC as it has a 51% ownership interest in this entity. Other
parties interests in this entity are reported as a minority interest in the condensed unaudited
consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
(b) Statements of Cash Flows
The Company revised the presentation of its cash flow statement and elected not to disclose
cash flows from discontinued operations separately for all periods presented. Accordingly, the
prior period has been revised to conform with the current year presentation.
6
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(c) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is a measure of net income (loss) and all other changes in equity
that result from transactions other than with shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) consists of
net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments.
Comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(23,657 |
) |
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
$ |
(27,881 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,898 |
) |
Foreign
currency translation gain (loss) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(23,596 |
) |
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
(27,823 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Revenue Recognition
Revenue and related costs for master and other service agreements billed on a time and
materials basis are recognized as the services are rendered. There are also some service agreements
that are billed on a fixed fee basis. Under the Companys fixed fee master service and similar type
service agreements, the Company furnishes various specified units of service for a separate fixed
price per unit of service. The Company recognizes revenue as the related unit of service is
performed. For service agreements on a fixed fee basis, profitability will be reduced if the actual
costs to complete each unit exceed original estimates. The Company also immediately recognizes the
full amount of any estimated loss on these fixed fee projects if estimated costs to complete the
remaining units exceed the revenue to be received from such units.
The Company recognizes revenue on unit based installation/construction projects using the
units-of-delivery method. The Companys unit based contracts relate primarily to contracts that
require the installation or construction of specified units within an infrastructure system. Under
the units-of-delivery method, revenue is recognized at the contractually agreed price per unit as
the units are completed and delivered. Profitability will be reduced if the actual costs to
complete each unit exceed original estimates. The Company is also required to immediately recognize
the full amount of any estimated loss on these projects if estimated costs to complete the
remaining units for the project exceed the revenue to be earned on such units. For certain
customers with unit based installation/construction projects, the Company recognizes revenue after
the service is performed and work orders are approved to ensure that collectibility is probable
from these customers. Revenue from completed work orders not collected in accordance with the
payment terms established with these customers is not recognized until collection is assured.
The Companys non-unit based, fixed price installation/construction contracts relate primarily
to contracts that require the construction and installation of an entire infrastructure system. The
Company recognizes revenue and related costs as work progresses on non-unit based, fixed price
contracts using the percentage-of-completion method, which relies on contract revenue and estimates
of total expected costs. The Company estimates total project costs and profit to be earned on each
long-term, fixed-price contract prior to commencement of work on the contract. The Company follows
this method since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs applicable to various
stages of a contract can be made. Under the percentage-of-completion method, the Company records
revenue and recognizes profit or loss as work on the contract progresses. The cumulative amount of
revenue recorded on a contract at a specified point in time is that percentage of total estimated
revenue that incurred costs to date bear to estimated total contract costs. If, as work progresses,
the actual contract costs exceed estimates, the profit recognized on revenue from that contract
decreases. The Company recognizes the full amount of any estimated loss on a contract at the time
the estimates indicate such a loss.
(e) Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The computation of basic net income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net income (loss) per
common share is based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period plus, when their effect is dilutive,
incremental shares consisting
7
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
of shares subject to stock options and unvested restricted stock
(common stock equivalents). For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, diluted net
income (loss) per common share includes the effect of common stock equivalents in the amount of
1,712,000 shares and 1,693,000 shares, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2005,
diluted net income (loss) per common share includes the effect of 537,000 shares of common stock
equivalents. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, common stock equivalents were not considered
because their effect would be antidilutive. Common stock equivalents amounted to 662,000 shares for
the six months ended June 30, 2005. Accordingly, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic
net loss per share for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
(f) Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment and
intangible assets with finite lives, for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS No. 144). In analyzing potential impairment, the Company used projections of future
discounted cash flows from the assets. These projections are based on its view of growth rates for
the related business, anticipated future economic conditions and the appropriate discount rates
relative to risk and estimates of residual values. The Company believes that its estimates are
consistent with assumptions that marketplace participants would use in their estimates of fair
value. In addition, due to the Companys intent to sell substantially all of its state Department
of Transportation projects and assets, it evaluated long-lived assets for these operations under
SFAS No. 144 based on projections of future discounted cash flows from these assets in 2006 and an
estimated selling price for the assets held for sale by using a weighted probability cash flow
analysis based on managements estimates. These estimates are subject to change in the future and
if the Company is not able to sell these projects and assets at the estimated selling price or the
cash flow changes because of changes in economic conditions, growth rates or terminal values, the
Company may incur impairment charges in the future related to these projects and assets.
(g) Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an infinite useful
life is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least
annually. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), the Company conducts, on at least an
annual basis, a review of its reporting entities to determine whether the carrying values of
goodwill exceed the fair market value using a discounted cash flow methodology for each entity.
Should this be the case, the value of its goodwill may be impaired and written down.
The Company could record impairment losses if, in the future, profitability and cash flows of
the reporting entities decline to the point where the carrying value of those units exceed their
market value.
In the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $23.5 million of goodwill in
connection with the DSSI acquisition as described in Note 5.
(h) Accrued Insurance
The Company maintains insurance policies subject to per claim deductibles of $2 million for
its workers compensation policy, $2 million for its general liability policy and $3 million for
its automobile liability policy. The Company has excess umbrella coverage for losses in excess of
the primary coverages of up to $100 million per claim and in the aggregate. The Company also
maintains an insurance policy with respect to employee group health claims subject to per claim
deductibles of $300,000. The Company actuarially determines any liabilities for unpaid claims and
associated expenses, including incurred but not reported losses and reflects those liabilities in
the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheet as other current and non-current liabilities.
The determination of such claims and expenses and the appropriateness of the related liability is
reviewed and updated quarterly. During the six months ended
June 30, 2006, the Company changed the discount factor used in estimating actuarial insurance
reserves for its workers compensation, general and automobile liability policies from 3.5% to 4.5% as of March 31, 2006, and from 4.5% to 5.2% as of June 30,
2006 to better reflect current market conditions and to use a discount factor that is more in line
with the market interest rate the Company receives on its investments. The change in discount rate resulted in a decrease of insurance reserves of $1.9
million.
8
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is periodically required to post letters of credit and provide cash collateral to
its insurance carriers and surety companies. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, total
outstanding letters of credit amounted to $66.5 million and $57.6 million, respectively, of which
$48.2 million and $41.8 million were outstanding to support our casualty and medical insurance
requirements at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Cash collateral posted amounted
to $24.6 million and $24.8 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Cash
collateral is included in other assets. The 2006 increase in the letters of credit is related to
additional collateral provided to the insurance carrier for the 2006 plan year in the amount of
$8.9 million, in comparison to the $18 million of cash collateral provided to the Companys
insurance carrier for the 2005 plan year.
(i) Stock Based Compensation
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R). This Statement requires companies to
expense the estimated fair value of stock options and similar equity instruments issued to
employees over the vesting period in their statement of operations. SFAS 123R eliminates the
alternative to use the intrinsic method of accounting provided for in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
(APB 25), which generally resulted in
no compensation expense recorded in the financial statements related to the grant of stock options
to employees if certain conditions were met.
The Company adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method effective January 1, 2006,
which requires the Company to record compensation expense over the vesting period for all awards
granted after the date of adoption, and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that
remain outstanding at the date of adoption. Accordingly, amounts for periods prior to January 1,
2006 presented herein have not been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS 123R. The pro forma
effect of the 2005 prior period is as follows and has been disclosed to be consistent with prior
accounting rules (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
For the Six |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Net income (loss), as reported |
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
$ |
(10,898 |
) |
Deduct: Total stock-based
employee compensation expense
determined under fair value
based methods for all awards |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
(2,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
(13,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value concepts were not changed significantly in SFAS 123R; however, in adopting SFAS
123R, companies must choose among alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions. After
assessing alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions, the Company will continue
using the Black-Scholes valuation model and has elected to use the ratable method to amortize
compensation expense over the vesting period of the grant.
9
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The fair value of each option granted was estimated using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Expected life employees |
|
4.26-6.26 years |
|
4.17-6.17 years |
|
4.26-6.29 years |
|
4.17-6.17 years |
Expected life executives |
|
5.74-7.74 years |
|
5.38-7.38 years |
|
5.74-7.74 years |
|
5.38-7.38 years |
Volatility percentage |
|
|
40%-65 |
% |
|
|
60%-65 |
% |
|
|
40%-65 |
% |
|
|
60%-65 |
% |
Interest rate |
|
|
5.08%-5.16 |
% |
|
|
4.54%-4.61 |
% |
|
|
4.97%-5.04 |
% |
|
|
4.54%-4.61 |
% |
Dividends |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
Forfeiture rate |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
6.97 |
% |
Total non-cash stock compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 related to
unvested stock options amounted to approximately $1,660,000, which is included in general and
administrative expenses in the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations. Included
in the expense is approximately $75,100 of compensation expense related to accelerations of stock
options that occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2006. Accelerations were a result of
certain benefits given to employees who were terminated during the quarter. During the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company granted 799,500 and 132,500 options, respectively, to
employees and executives to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at their fair value on
the date of grant. The options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 had a
weighted average exercise price of $13.92 and $8.02 per share, respectively. The weighted average
fair value of options granted during the period was $8.62 and $5.15
per share, respectively.
Total non-cash stock compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 related to
unvested stock options amounted to approximately $2,914,600, of which $241,900 is included in loss
from discontinued operations and $2,672,700 is included in general and administrative expenses in
the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations. Included in the expense is
approximately $396,900 of compensation expense related to accelerations of stock options that
occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2006. Accelerations were a result of certain benefits
given to employees who ceased employment during the six month period. During the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company granted 799,500 and 257,500 options, respectively, to employees
and executives to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at their fair value on the date of
grant. The options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 had a weighted
average exercise price of $13.92 and $8.52 per share, respectively.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $8.62 and $5.45 per
share, respectively.
The Company also grants restricted stock, which is valued based on the market price of the
common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense arising from restricted stock grants is
recognized using the straight-line method over the vesting period. Unearned compensation for
restricted stock is a reduction of shareholders equity in the condensed unaudited consolidated
balance sheets. Through June 30, 2006, the Company has issued 244,523 shares of restricted stock
valued at approximately $2.4 million which is being expensed over various vesting periods (12
months to 3 years). Total unearned compensation related to restricted stock grants as of June 30,
2006 is approximately $1,374,600. Restricted stock expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005 is approximately $383,000 and $117,900, respectively, and is included in general and
administrative expenses in the condensed unaudited statements of operations. Restricted stock
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is
approximately $551,200 and $142,000,
respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the condensed unaudited
consolidated statements of operations.
(j) Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications were made to the prior period financial statements in order to
conform to the current period presentation. In addition, as discussed in Note 8, the Company in
2005 announced its intention to sell substantially all of its state Department of Transportation
related projects and assets. Accordingly, the net loss for these projects and assets for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 have been reclassified from the prior period presentation as a
loss from discontinued operations in the Companys condensed unaudited consolidated statements of
operations.
10
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(k) Equity investments
The Company has one investment which is accounted for by the equity method as the Company owns
49% of the entity and has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operational
policies of the limited liability company. The Companys share of its earnings or losses in this
investment is included as other income, net in the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of
operations. As of June 30, 2006, the Companys investment exceeded the net equity of such
investment and accordingly the excess is considered to be equity goodwill. The Company periodically
evaluates the equity goodwill for impairment under Accounting Principle Board No. 18, The Equity
Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, as amended. See Note 11.
(l) Fair value of financial instruments
The Company estimates the fair market value of financial instruments through the use of public
market prices, quotes from financial institutions and other available information. Judgment is
required in interpreting data to develop estimates of market value and, accordingly, amounts are
not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange.
Short-term financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes
receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities, consist primarily of instruments without
extended maturities, the fair value of which, based on managements estimates, equaled their
carrying values. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the fair value of the Companys
outstanding senior subordinated notes was $120.7 million and $195.0 million, respectively, based on
quoted market values. The Company uses letters of credit to back certain insurance policies. The
letters of credit reflect fair value as a condition of their underlying purpose and are subject to
fees under the credit agreement.
Note 4 Sale of the Companys Common Stock
On January 24, 2006, the Company completed a public offering of 14,375,000 shares of common
stock at $11.50 per share. The net proceeds from the sale were $156.5 million after deducting
underwriting discounts and offering expenses. The Company used $18.5 million of the net proceeds
for the cash portion of the purchase price for the DSSI acquisition, as described in Note 5. On
March 2, 2006, the Company used $75.5 million of the net proceeds to redeem a portion of its 7.75%
senior subordinated notes due February 2008 plus interest (see Note 7). The Company expects to use
the remaining net proceeds for working capital, other possible acquisitions of assets and
businesses, fund organic growth and other general corporate purposes.
Note 5 Acquisition of Digital Satellite Services, Inc.
Effective January 31, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed
certain operating liabilities and contracts of Digital Satellite Services, Inc., which it refers to
as the DSSI acquisition. The purchase price was composed of $18.5 million in cash, $6.9 million of
MasTec common stock (637,214 shares based on the closing price of the Companys common stock of
$11.77 per share on January 27, 2006 discounted by 8.75% due to the shares being restricted for 120
days), $784,000 of transaction costs and an earn-out based on future performance. Pursuant to the
terms of the purchase agreement, the Company registered the resale of the MasTec common stock on
April 28, 2006.
DSSI, which had revenues exceeding $50 million for the year ended December 31, 2005
(unaudited), was involved in the installation of residential and commercial satellite and security
services in several markets including Atlanta, Georgia, the Greenville-Spartanburg area of South
Carolina and Asheville, North Carolina, and portions of Tennessee, Kentucky and Virginia. These
markets are contiguous to areas in which the Company is active with similar installation services.
Following the DSSI acquisition, the Company provides installation services from the mid-Atlantic
states to South Florida.
The purchase price allocation for the DSSI acquisition is based on fair-value of each of the
following components on January 31, 2006 (unaudited) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
$ |
2,026 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
658 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
23,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
$ |
26,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The non-compete agreements are with an executive and with the shareholders of DSSI and will be
amortized over a five and a seven year period, respectively.
DSSIs results of operations prior to the date of acquisition are not significant to the
Companys results of operations or financial condition and accordingly, no pro forma information is
disclosed.
Note 6 Other Assets and Liabilities
Prepaid expenses and other current assets as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consist of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
10,775 |
|
|
$ |
5,308 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
2,231 |
|
Non-trade receivables |
|
|
9,533 |
|
|
|
21,452 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
4,931 |
|
|
|
4,815 |
|
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
35,848 |
|
|
$ |
42,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets consist of the following as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Investment in real estate |
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
Equity investment |
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
5,268 |
|
Long-term portion of deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
3,163 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
Cash surrender value of insurance policies |
|
|
6,978 |
|
|
|
6,369 |
|
Non-compete agreements, net |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
Insurance escrow |
|
|
24,624 |
|
|
|
24,792 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
50,352 |
|
|
$ |
46,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current and non-current liabilities consist of the following as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation |
|
$ |
9,218 |
|
|
$ |
11,084 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
17,024 |
|
|
|
17,144 |
|
Billings in excess of costs |
|
|
4,810 |
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
Accrued losses on contracts |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
Accrued payments related to equity investment |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,799 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current liabilities |
|
$ |
46,742 |
|
|
$ |
45,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued insurance |
|
$ |
34,357 |
|
|
$ |
34,926 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
Other |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
$ |
36,343 |
|
|
$ |
37,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 Debt
Debt is comprised of the following at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revolving credit facility at LIBOR plus 1.25% as
of June 30, 2006 and 2.25% as of December
31, 2005 (5.48% as of June 30, 2006 and 5.25%
as of December 31, 2005) or, at the
Companys option, the banks prime rate as of
June 30, 2006 and the banks prime rate plus
0.75% as of December 31, 2005 (8.25%
as of June 30, 2006 and 8.00% December
31, 2005) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,154 |
|
7.75% senior subordinated notes due February 2008 |
|
|
120,956 |
|
|
|
195,943 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable for equipment, at interest rates
from 7.5% to 8.5% due in installments
through the year 2008 |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
128,019 |
|
|
|
200,370 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(4,266 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
126,961 |
|
|
$ |
196,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has a secured revolving credit facility for its operations which was amended and
restated on May 10, 2005 increasing the maximum amount of availability from $125 million to $150
million, subject to reserves of $5.0 million, and other adjustments and restrictions (the Credit
Facility). The Credit Facility expires on May 10, 2010. The deferred financing costs related to
the Credit Facility are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets in
the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets.
Based on the Companys improved financial position, on May 8, 2006, the Company amended its
Credit Facility (2006 Amendment) to reduce the interest rate margins charged on borrowings and
letters of credit. The 2006 Amendment also increases the maximum permitted purchase price for an
acquisition, increases permitted receivable concentration of certain customers, increases the
permitted capital expenditures and debt baskets, and reduces the required minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio if net availability falls below $20.0 million.
The amount that the Company can borrow at any given time is based upon a formula that takes
into account, among other things, eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and equipment
which can result in borrowing availability of less than the full amount of the Credit Facility. As
of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, net availability
under the Credit Facility totaled $47.9
million and $55.4 million, respectively, net of outstanding standby letters of credit aggregating
$66.5 million and $57.6 million as of such dates,
respectively. At June 30, 2006, $48.2 million of
the outstanding letters of credit were issued to support the Companys casualty and medical
insurance requirements. These letters of credit mature at various dates and
most have automatic renewal provisions subject to prior notice of cancellation. The Credit Facility
is collateralized by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Companys
assets and a pledge of the stock of certain of its operating subsidiaries. All wholly-owned
subsidiaries collateralize the Credit Facility. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had
outstanding cash draws under the Credit Facility of $0 and $4.2 million, respectively. Interest
under the Credit Facility accrues at rates based, at the Companys option, on the agent banks base
rate plus a margin of between 0.0% and 0.75% or the LIBOR rate (as
13
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
defined in the Credit Facility)
plus a margin of between 1.25% and 2.25%, depending on certain financial thresholds. The Credit
Facility includes an unused facility fee of 0.375%, which may be adjusted to as low as 0.250%.
If the net availability under the Credit Facility is under $20.0 million at any given day, the
Company is required to be in compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, which, as part
of the 2006 Amendment, was reduced to 1.1 to 1.0 measured on a monthly basis. Certain events are
triggered if the Company is not in compliance with this ratio. The fixed charge coverage ratio is
generally defined to mean the ratio of the Companys net income before interest expense, income tax
expense, depreciation expense, and amortization expense minus net capital expenditures and cash
taxes paid to the sum of all interest expense plus current maturities of debt for the period. The
financial covenant was not applicable as of June 30, 2006 because the net availability under the
Credit Facility was $47.9 million as of June 30, 2006 and net availability did not reduce below
$20.0 million at any given day during the period.
Based upon the 2006 Amendment and the Companys current availability, liquidity and
projections for 2006, the Company believes it will be in compliance with the Credit Facilitys
terms and conditions and the minimum availability requirements for the remainder of 2006. The
Company is dependent upon borrowings and letters of credit under this Credit Facility to fund
operations. Should the Company be unable to comply with the terms and conditions of the Credit
Facility, it would be required to obtain modifications to the Credit Facility or another source of
financing to continue to operate. The Company may not be able to achieve its 2006 projections and
this may adversely affect its ability to remain in compliance with the Credit Facilitys minimum
net availability requirements and minimum fixed charge ratio in the future. The Companys variable
rate Credit Facility exposes it to interest rate risk. However, the Company had no cash borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Facility at June 30, 2006.
Senior Subordinated Notes
As of June 30, 2006, the Company had outstanding $120.9 million in principal amount of its
7.75% senior subordinated notes due in February 2008. Interest is due semi-annually. The notes are
redeemable, at the Companys option at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued but unpaid
interest. On March 2, 2006, the Company redeemed $75.0 million of the senior subordinated notes and
paid approximately $0.5 million in accrued interest. The notes also contain default (including cross-default)
provisions and covenants restricting many of the same transactions restricted under the Credit
Facility.
Capital Lease Obligations
During 2006, the Company entered into several agreements which provided financing for various
machinery and equipment totaling $6.5 million. These capital leases are non-cash transactions and,
accordingly, have been excluded form the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows.
These leases range between 60 and 84 months and have effective interest rates ranging from 6.03%
to 7.65%. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 13, Accounting for
Leases (SFAS 13), as amended, these leases were capitalized. SFAS 13 requires the capitalization
of leases meeting certain criteria, with the related asset being recorded in property and equipment
and an offsetting amount recorded as a liability. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had $6.5 million
in total indebtedness relating to the capital leases entered into during 2006, of which $5.5
million was considered long-term.
The Company had no holdings of derivative financial or commodity instruments at June 30, 2006.
Note 8 Discontinued Operations
In March 2004, the Company ceased performing contractual services for customers in Brazil,
abandoned all assets of its Brazil subsidiary and made a determination to exit the Brazil market.
The abandoned Brazil subsidiary has been classified as a discontinued operation. In November 2005,
the subsidiary applied for relief and was adjudicated bankrupt by a Brazilian bankruptcy court. The
subsidiary is currently being liquidated under court supervision. For the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005, the expenses incurred by the Brazilian subsidiary were principally related to
legal fees incurred in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings. For the three months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005, the net loss from the Brazilian operations was $30,000 and $0, respectively. For the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the net loss from these operations was $82,000 and $0,
respectively.
14
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities for the Brazil operations as of June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
19,507 |
|
|
|
19,455 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation. |
|
|
(21,387 |
) |
|
|
(21,335 |
) |
During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company ceased performing new services in the network
services operations and sold these operations in 2005. On May 24, 2005, the Company sold certain of
its network services operations assets to a third party for $208,501 consisting of $100,000 in cash
and a promissory note in the principal amount of $108,501 due in May 2006. The promissory note is
included in other current assets in the accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated balance
sheet. These operations have been classified as a discontinued operation in all periods presented.
The net loss for the network services operations was $17,000 and $114,000 for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The net loss for the network services operations was
$1.0 million and $1.4 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of the network services operations
as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
883 |
|
Non current assets |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
Non current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders (deficit) equity |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
The following table summarizes the results of operations of network services (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
3,777 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(3,777 |
) |
Operating and other expenses |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before benefit
for income taxes |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,002 |
) |
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,447 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,002 |
) |
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 31, 2005, the executive committee of the Companys board of directors voted to
sell substantially all of its state Department of Transportation related projects and assets. The
projects and assets that are for sale have been accounted for as discontinued operations for all
periods presented, including the reclassification of results of operations from these projects to
discontinued operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005. A quarterly
review of the carrying value of the underlying net assets related to the state Department of
Transportation projects and assets was conducted in connection with the decision to sell these
projects and assets. Management assumed a six month projected cash flow and estimated a selling
price using a weighted probability cash flow approach based on managements estimates. Following
the second quarter of 2006 results and cash flow projection for these projects and
15
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
related
assets, management determined there were sufficient indicators of
impairment to the carrying value of the underlying net
assets of the state Department of Transportation related projects and
assets. As a result, $20.8 million non-cash
impairment charge was recorded for the estimated sales price and
disposition of the state Department of
Transportation related projects and assets. All impairment charges are included in discontinued
operations. These estimates are subject to change in the future and if the Company is not able to
sell these projects and assets at the estimated selling price or the cash flow changes, the Company may incur additional
impairment charges in the future. As of June 30, 2006, the carrying value of the subject net assets
for sale was approximately $20.2 million after taking into consideration the impairment charge.
This amount is comprised of total assets of $50.4 million less total liabilities of $30.2 million.
The following table summarizes the assets held for sale and liabilities related to the assets
held for sale for the state Department of Transportation operations as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
33,862 |
|
|
$ |
44,906 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
14,913 |
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
$ |
49,388 |
|
|
$ |
69,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,822 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
2,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets held for sale |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
|
$ |
6,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
29,460 |
|
|
$ |
30,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities related to assets held for sale |
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the state Department of
Transportation related projects and assets that are considered to be discontinued (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
22,402 |
|
|
$ |
26,449 |
|
|
$ |
47,066 |
|
|
$ |
50,243 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
(33,545 |
) |
|
|
(26,783 |
) |
|
|
(62,815 |
) |
|
|
(54,676 |
) |
Operating and other expenses |
|
|
(24,546 |
) |
|
|
(2,707 |
) |
|
|
(27,620 |
) |
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before
benefit for income taxes |
|
$ |
(35,689 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,369 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,167 |
) |
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(35,689 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,041 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,369 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company brought an action against NextiraOne Federal in the Federal Court in Eastern
District of Virginia, to recover payment for services rendered in connection with a state
Department of Transportation project, which is included in discontinued operations, on a network
wiring contract. NextiraOne counterclaimed for offsets and remediation. On May 5, 2006, the Judge
ruled that the Company failed to establish an entitlement to recover damages for contract work
done, and that NextiraOne Federal failed to establish an entitlement to recover costs of alleged
offsets and costs of remediation. Neither party obtained the relief sought. The Company believes the
ruling is an error, and has sought remedy on appeal. The Company may be unable to obtain relief
without additional expenses.
In April 2006, the Company settled, without payment to the plaintiffs by the Company, several
complaints for purported securities class actions that were filed against the Company and certain
officers in the second quarter of 2004.
16
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
While the Company believes it would have ultimately been
successful in defense of these actions, given the amount of the settlement, the inherent risk of
uncertainty of the legal proceedings, and the substantial time and expense of defending these
proceedings, the Company concluded that entering into the settlement was the appropriate course of
action. On June 30, 2006, the parties executed a Stipulation of Settlement and filed a Joint Motion
for Preliminary Approval of the settlement of the federal securities class action. The settlement
is contingent upon final approval by the Court. The Court scheduled a preliminary hearing on the
approval of the settlement for August 15, 2006. If the settlement is preliminarily approved, the
Court will schedule a final fairness hearing to determine whether the settlement is fair, reasonable and
adequate. As part of the settlement, the Companys excess insurance carrier has retained its rights
to seek reimbursement of up to $2.0 million from the Company based on its claim that notice was not
properly given under the policy. The Company believes these claims are without merit and plans to
continue vigorously defending this action. The Company also believes that they have claims against
the insurance broker for any losses arising from the notice.
The
parties in the shareholder derivative action, which is based on the
same factual predicate as the purported federal securities class
action and related SEC informal inquiry, have executed a memorandum of understanding
and are presently finalizing the stipulation of settlement. Once executed, the stipulation of
settlement will be filed with the Court for final approval.
The SEC is conducting an informal fact-finding inquiry related to the restatements of the
Companys financial statements. The Company is fully cooperating with the SEC. The Company has
voluntarily produced documents to the SEC. The SEC is currently conducting interviews in connection
with this inquiry.
In October 2005, eleven former employees filed a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective
action against MasTec in the Federal District Court in Tampa, Florida, alleging failure to pay
overtime wages as required under the FLSA. The matter is currently stayed and under investigation.
The Company does not believe it is liable under the FLSA as alleged in the complaint. The Company
plans to vigorously defend this lawsuit, but may be unable to successfully resolve this dispute
without incurring significant expenses. Due to the early stage of this proceeding, any potential
loss cannot presently be determined.
During construction of a natural gas pipeline project in Oregon in 2003, the Company and its
customer, Coos County, Oregon, were cited for violations of the Clean Water Act by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers). Despite protracted negotiations, the parties were
unable to settle these complaints. On March 30, 2006, the Corps of Engineers filed suit against
the Company and Coos County in Federal District Court in Oregon. The Company intends to defend
this action vigorously, but may be unable to do so without incurring significant expenses. Due to
the early stage of this proceeding, potential loss, if any, cannot be determined.
In connection with the same project, a complaint alleging failure to comply with prevailing
wage requirements was filed against us by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry. This matter was
filed with the state court in Coos County. The Company intends to defend this action vigorously,
but may be unable to do so without incurring significant expenses. Due to the early stage of this
litigation, any potential loss cannot presently be determined.
The potential loss for all unresolved Coos Bay matters and unpaid settlements reached
described above is estimated to be $125,000 at June 30, 2006, which has been recorded in the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as accrued expenses.
In June 2005, the Company posted a $2.3 million bond in order to pursue the appeal of a $1.7
million final judgment entered June 30, 2005 against the Company for damages plus attorneys fees
resulting from a break in a Citgo pipeline. The Company seeks a new trial and reduction in the
damages award. The Company will continue to contest this matter in the appellate court, and on
subsequent retrial. The amount of the loss, if any, relating to this matter not covered by
insurance is estimated to be $100,000 to $2.4 million, of which $100,000 is recorded in the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006, as accrued expenses.
The Company is also a party to other pending legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business. While complete assurance cannot be given as to the outcome of any legal claims,
management believes that any financial impact would not be material to its results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
17
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is required to provide payment and performance bonds for some of its contractual
commitments related to projects in process. At June 30, 2006, the cost to complete projects for
which the $283.9 million in performance and payment bonds are
outstanding was $64.2 million.
On January 3, 2005, MasTec entered into an employment agreement with Gregory S. Floerke
relating to his employment as Chief Operations Officer. He was solely focused and responsible for
managing intelligent traffic services related projects for MasTec. The agreement was to expire on
January 2, 2007 unless earlier terminated, and provided that Mr. Floerke would be paid an annual
salary of $300,000 during the first year of employment and $350,000 during the second year of
employment. The agreement also provided for the grant to Mr. Floerke of stock options pursuant to
MasTecs stock option plans and contained confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation
provisions. Mr. Floerke resigned effective March 30, 2006. In connection therewith, the Company
entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Floerke in which the Company paid him $95,000. This
separation agreement terminated the employment agreement with Mr. Floerke. The Company also
recorded approximately $242,000 in stock compensation for the first quarter of 2006 related to the
extension of the exercise period on Mr. Floerkes stock options and the acceleration of the vesting
of his unvested options. This amount is included in non-cash stock compensation expense as
discussed in Note 3(i) and is included in loss from discontinued operations.
Note 10 Concentrations of Risk
The Company provides services to its customers in the following industries: communications,
utilities and government.
Revenue for customers in these industries is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Communications |
|
$ |
169,852 |
|
|
$ |
157,763 |
|
|
$ |
326,673 |
|
|
$ |
298,242 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
44,158 |
|
|
|
36,285 |
|
|
|
97,902 |
|
|
|
80,779 |
|
Government |
|
|
18,090 |
|
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
26,277 |
|
|
|
24,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
232,100 |
|
|
$ |
209,660 |
|
|
$ |
450,852 |
|
|
$ |
403,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company grants credit, generally without collateral, to its customers. Consequently, the
Company is subject to potential credit risk related to changes in business and economic factors.
However, the Company generally has certain lien rights on that work and concentrations of credit
risk are limited due to the diversity of the customer base. The Company believes its billing and
collection policies are adequate to minimize potential credit risk. During the three months ended
June 30, 2006, 44.8% of the Companys total revenue was attributed to two customers. Revenue from
these two customers accounted for 33.9% and 10.9%, respectively, of total revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2006. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, two customers accounted
for 41.2% of the Companys total revenue after adjustment for discontinued operations (see Note 8).
Revenue from these two customers accounted for 28.9% and 12.3%, respectively, of the total revenue
for the three months ended June 30, 2005. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, 47.9% of the
Companys total revenue was attributed to two customers. Revenue from these two customers accounted
for 35.8% and 12.1%, respectively, of the total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, 43.5% of the Companys total revenue was attributed to
two customers. Revenue from these two customers accounted for 30.4% and 13.1%, respectively, of the
total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of customers to make required payments. Management analyzes historical bad debt
experience, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, the availability of mechanics and
other liens, the existence of payment bonds and other sources of payment, and current economic
trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. If judgments regarding
the collectibility of accounts receivables were incorrect, adjustments to the allowance may be
required, which would reduce profitability. In addition, the Companys reserve mainly covers the
accounts receivable
18
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
related to the unprecedented number of customers that filed for bankruptcy
protection during the year 2001 and general economic climate of 2002. As of June 30, 2006, the
Company had remaining receivables from customers undergoing bankruptcy reorganization totaling
$13.8 million net of $7.4 million in specific reserves. As of December 31, 2005, the Company had
remaining receivables from customers undergoing bankruptcy reorganization totaling $14.5 million
net of $8.0 million in specific reserves. Based on the analytical process described above,
management believes that the Company will recover the net amounts recorded. The Company maintains
an allowance for doubtful accounts of $13.2 million and $15.9 million as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively, for both specific customers and as a reserve against other past
due balances. The decrease in reserves is due to certain specific reserves being written off
against the receivable in the six months ended June 30, 2006. Should additional customers file for
bankruptcy or experience difficulties, or should anticipated recoveries in existing bankruptcies
and other workout situations fail to materialize, the Company could experience reduced cash flows
and losses in excess of the current allowance.
Note 11 Equity Investment
The Company has a 49% interest in a limited liability company that it purchased from a third
party. The purchase price for this investment was an initial amount of $3.7 million which was paid
in four quarterly installments of $925,000 through December 31, 2005. Beginning in the first
quarter of 2006, eight additional contingent quarterly payments are expected to be made to the
third party from which the interest was purchased. The contingent payments will be up to a maximum
of $1.3 million per quarter based on the level of unit sales and profitability of the limited
liability company in specified preceding quarters. The first three quarterly payments, each of
$925,000, were made on January 10, 2006, April 10, 2006 and July 11, 2006. The July amount is
included in accrued expenses and other assets at June 30, 2006. The Company also may be required
under the agreement to make capital contributions from time to time equal to 49% of the additional
capital required by the venture. In March 2006, the venture requested a total capital contribution
in the amount of $2.0 million of which $980,000, or 49%, was paid by MasTec. Accordingly, this
amount increased the investment balance which is included in other assets at June 30, 2006.
As of June 30, 2006, the Companys investment exceeded the net equity of such investment and
accordingly the excess is considered to be equity goodwill.
The Company has accounted for this investment using the equity method as the Company has the
ability to exercise significant influence over the financial and operational policies of this
limited liability company. The Company recognized $1,207,000 and $347,000 in investment income
during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company recognized
$1,563,000 and $562,000 in investment income during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had an investment balance of approximately $9.7
million in relation to this investment included in other assets in the condensed unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
Note 12 Related Party Transactions
MasTec purchases, rents and leases equipment used in its business from a number of different
vendors, on a non-exclusive basis, including Neff Corp., in which Jorge Mas, the Companys Chairman
and Jose Mas, the Companys Vice-Chairman and Executive Vice President, were directors and owners
of a controlling interest through June 4, 2005. Juan Carlos Mas, the brother of Jorge and Jose Mas,
is Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, a director and a shareholder of Neff Corp. During the period
from April 1, 2005 through June 4, 2005, the Company paid Neff $155,395. During the period from
January 1, 2005 through June 4, 2005, the Company paid Neff $328,013. MasTec believes the amount
paid to Neff was equivalent to the payments that would have been made between unrelated parties for
similar transactions acting at arms length.
MasTec has entered into split dollar agreements with key executives and the Chairman of the
Board. During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, MasTec paid $284,000 and $0,
respectively, in premiums in connection with these split dollar agreements. During the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, MasTec paid $610,000 and $0, respectively, in premiums in connection
with these split dollar agreements.
19
MasTec, Inc.
Notes to the Condensed Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 13 New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN No. 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company
is evaluating the effect this Interpretation will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and
140. In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. These
Statements are not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
20
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of
1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but are the intent,
belief, or current expectations, of our business and industry, and the assumptions upon which these
statements are based. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, will, could, would,
should, may, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and variations of these words and the
negatives thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties,
and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict, and could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking
statements. These risks and uncertainties include those described in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
report and in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,
including those described under Risk Factors in the Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements that
were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. Readers are cautioned to
not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our managements view only as
of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking
statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to
future operating results.
Overview
We are a leading specialty contractor operating mainly throughout the United States and Canada
and across a range of industries. Our core activities are the building, installation, maintenance
and upgrade of communications and utility infrastructure and transportation systems. Our primary
customers are in the following industries: communications (including satellite television and cable
television), utilities and governments. We provide similar infrastructure services across the
industries we serve. Our customers rely on us to build and maintain infrastructure and networks
that are critical to their delivery of voice, video and data communications, electricity and
transportation systems.
Effective January 31, 2006, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain
operating liabilities and contracts of Digital Satellite Services, Inc., which we refer to as the
DSSI acquisition. The purchase price was composed of $18.5 million in cash, $6.9 million of MasTec
common stock (637,214 shares based on the closing price of $11.77 per share on January 27, 2006
discounted due to shares being restricted for up to 120 days), $784,000 of transaction costs and
an earn-out based on future performance. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement, we
registered the resale of the MasTec common stock on April 28, 2006.
DSSI, which had revenues exceeding $50 million during the year ended December 31, 2005
(unaudited), was involved in the installation of residential and commercial satellite and security
services in several markets including Atlanta, Georgia, the Greenville-Spartanburg area of South
Carolina and Asheville, North Carolina, and portions of Tennessee, Kentucky and Virginia. These
markets are contiguous to areas in which we are active with similar installation services.
Following the DSSI acquisition, we provide installation services from the mid-Atlantic states to
South Florida.
The purchase price allocation for the DSSI acquisition is based on fair-value of each of the
following components as of January 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets |
|
$ |
2,026 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
658 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
23,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
$ |
26,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
We provide services to our customers which are companies in the communications, as well as
utilities and government industries.
21
Revenue for customers in these industries is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Communications |
|
$ |
169,852 |
|
|
$ |
157,763 |
|
|
$ |
326,673 |
|
|
$ |
298,242 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
44,158 |
|
|
|
36,285 |
|
|
|
97,902 |
|
|
|
80,779 |
|
Government |
|
|
18,090 |
|
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
|
26,277 |
|
|
|
24,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
232,100 |
|
|
$ |
209,660 |
|
|
$ |
450,852 |
|
|
$ |
403,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A majority of our revenue is derived from projects performed under service agreements. Some of
these agreements are billed on a time and materials basis and revenue is recognized as the services
are rendered. We also provide services under master service agreements which are generally
multi-year agreements. Certain of our master service agreements are exclusive up to a specified
dollar amount per work order for each defined geographic area. Work performed under master service
and other agreements is typically generated by work orders, each of which is performed for a fixed
fee. The majority of these services typically are of a maintenance nature and to a lesser extent
upgrade services. These master service agreements and other service agreements are frequently
awarded on a competitive bid basis, although customers are sometimes willing to negotiate contract
extensions beyond their original terms without re-bidding. Our master service agreements and other
service agreements have various terms, depending upon the nature of the services provided and are
typically subject to termination on short notice. Under our master service and similar type service
agreements, we furnish various specified units of service each for a separate fixed price per unit
of service. We recognize revenue as the related unit of service is performed. For service
agreements on a fixed fee basis, profitability will be reduced if the actual costs to complete each
unit exceed original estimates. We also immediately recognize the full amount of any estimated loss
on these fixed fee projects if estimated costs to complete the remaining units for the project
exceed the revenue to be received from such units.
The remainder of our work is generated pursuant to contracts for specific
installation/construction projects or jobs. For installation/construction projects, we recognize
revenue on the units-of-delivery or percentage-of-completion methods. Revenue on unit based
projects is recognized using the units-of-delivery method. Under the units-of-delivery method,
revenue is recognized as the units are completed at the contractually agreed price per unit. For
certain customers with unit based installation/construction projects, we recognize revenue after
the service is performed and the work orders are approved to ensure that collectibility is probable
from these customers. Revenue from completed work orders not collected in accordance with the
payment terms established with these customers is not recognized until collection is assured.
Revenue on non-unit based contracts is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Under
the percentage-of-completion method, we record revenue as work on the contract progresses. The
cumulative amount of revenue recorded on a contract at a specified point in time is that percentage
of total estimated revenue that incurred costs to date bear to estimated total contract costs.
Customers are billed with varying frequency: weekly, monthly or upon attaining specific milestones.
Such contracts generally include retainage provisions under which 2% to 15% of the contract price
is withheld from us until the work has been completed and accepted by the customer. If, as work
progresses, the actual projects costs exceed estimates, the profit recognized on revenue from that
project decreases. We recognize the full amount of any estimated loss on a contract at the time the
estimates indicate such a loss.
Revenue by type of contract is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Master service and other service agreements |
|
$ |
164,752 |
|
|
$ |
150,222 |
|
|
$ |
329,291 |
|
|
$ |
291,452 |
|
Installation/construction projects agreements |
|
|
67,348 |
|
|
|
59,438 |
|
|
|
121,561 |
|
|
|
112,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
232,100 |
|
|
$ |
209,660 |
|
|
$ |
450,852 |
|
|
$ |
403,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of Revenue
Our costs of revenue include the costs of providing services or completing the projects under
our contracts including operations payroll and benefits, fuel, subcontractor costs, equipment
rental, materials not provided by our customers, and
22
insurance. Profitability will be reduced if the actual costs to complete each unit exceed original
estimates on fixed price service agreements. We also immediately recognize the full amount of any
estimated loss on fixed fee projects if estimated costs to complete the remaining units for the
project exceed the revenue to be received from such units.
Our customers generally supply materials such as cable, conduit and telephone equipment.
Customer furnished materials are not included in revenue and cost of sales due to all materials
being purchased by the customer. The customer determines the specifications of the materials that
are to be utilized to perform installation/construction services. We are only responsible for the
performance of the installation/construction services and not the materials for any contract that
includes customer furnished materials nor do we not have any risk associated with customer
furnished materials. Our customers retain the financial and performance risk of all customer
furnished materials.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include all costs of our management and administrative
personnel, provisions for bad debts, rent, utilities, travel, business development efforts and back
office administration such as financial services, insurance, administration, professional costs and
clerical and administrative overhead.
Discontinued Operations
In 2004, we declared each of our Brazil subsidiary and network services operations a
discontinued operation. In 2005, we declared substantially all of our state Department of
Transportation related projects and assets a discontinued operation due to our intention to sell
these projects and assets. Accordingly, results of operations for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2005 of substantially all of our state Department of Transportation related projects
and assets have been reclassified to discontinued operations and all financial information for all
periods presented reflects these operations as discontinued operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition,
allowance for doubtful accounts, intangible assets, reserves and accruals, impairment of assets,
income taxes, insurance reserves and litigation and contingencies. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities, that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ
from these estimates if conditions change or if certain key assumptions used in making these
estimates ultimately prove to be materially incorrect.
We believe the following critical accounting policies involve our more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue and related costs for master and other service agreements billed on a time and
materials basis are recognized as the services are rendered. There are also some master service
agreements that are billed on a fixed fee basis. Under our fixed fee master service and similar
type service agreements we furnish various specified units of service for a separate fixed price
per unit of service. We recognize revenue as the related unit of service is performed. For service
agreements on a fixed fee basis, profitability will be reduced if the actual costs to complete each
unit exceed original estimates. We also immediately recognize the full amount of any estimated loss
on these fixed fee projects if estimated costs to complete the remaining units exceed the revenue
to be received from such units.
We recognize revenue on unit based installation/construction projects using the
units-of-delivery method. Our unit based contracts relate primarily to contracts that require the
installation or construction of specified units within an infrastructure system. Under the
units-of-delivery method, revenue is recognized at the contractually agreed upon price
as the units are completed and delivered. Our profitability will be reduced if the actual
costs to complete each unit
23
exceed our original estimates. We are also required to immediately
recognize the full amount of any estimated loss on these projects if estimated costs to complete
the remaining units for the project exceed the revenue to be earned on such units. For certain
customers with unit based installation/construction projects, we recognize revenue after service
has been performed and work orders are approved to ensure that collectibility is probable from
these customers. Revenue from completed work orders not collected in accordance with the payment
terms established with these customers is not recognized until collection is assured.
Our non-unit based, fixed price installation/construction contracts relate primarily to
contracts that require the construction and installation of an entire infrastructure system. We
recognize revenue and related costs as work progresses on non-unit based, fixed price contracts
using the percentage-of-completion method, which relies on contract revenue and estimates of total
expected costs. We estimate total project costs and profit to be earned on each long-term,
fixed-price contract prior to commencement of work on the contract. We follow this method since
reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs applicable to various stages of a contract
can be made. Under the percentage-of-completion method, we record revenue and recognize profit or
loss as work on the contract progresses. The cumulative amount of revenue recorded on a contract at
a specified point in time is that percentage of total estimated revenue that incurred costs to date
bear to estimated total contract costs. If, as work progresses, the actual contract costs exceed
our estimates, the profit we recognize from that contract decreases. We recognize the full amount
of any estimated loss on a contract at the time our estimates indicate such a loss.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability
or unwillingness of our clients to make required payments. Management analyzes past due balances
based on invoice date, historical bad debt experience, customer concentrations, customer
credit-worthiness, customer financial condition and credit reports, the availability of mechanics
and other liens, the existence of payment bonds and other sources of payment, and current economic
trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We review the adequacy
of reserves for doubtful accounts on a quarterly basis. If our estimates of the collectibility of
accounts receivable are incorrect, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be
required, which could reduce our profitability.
Our estimates for our allowance for doubtful accounts are subject to significant change during
times of economic weakness or uncertainty in either the overall U.S. economy or the industries we
serve, and our loss experience has increased during such times.
We recorded provisions against the results of operations for doubtful accounts of $2.2 million
and $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We recorded
provisions against the results of operations for doubtful accounts of $3.4 million and $1.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All provisions against the results
of operations for doubtful accounts are included in part in general and administrative expenses and
in part in loss from discontinued operations in our condensed unaudited consolidated financial
statements. These provisions are based on the results of managements quarterly reviews and
analyses of our write-off history.
Inventories
Inventories consist of materials and supplies for construction projects, and are typically
purchased on a project-by-project basis. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (using the
specific identification method) or market. Construction projects are completed pursuant to customer
specifications. The loss of the customer or the cancellation of the project could result in an
impairment of the value of materials purchased for that customer or project. Technological or
market changes can also render certain materials obsolete. Allowances for inventory obsolescence
are determined based upon the specific facts and circumstances for each project and market
conditions. The provisions were mainly due to inventories that were purchased for specific jobs no
longer in process.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets, consisting primarily of property and equipment and intangible
assets with finite lives, for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No.
144). In analyzing potential impairment, we use projections of future undiscounted cash flows from
the assets. These projections are based on our views of growth rates for the related business, anticipated future economic conditions and the appropriate discount rates
relative to risk and estimates of residual values. We believe that our estimates are consistent
with assumptions that marketplace participants would use
24
in their estimates of fair value. In addition, due to our intent to sell substantially all of our state Department of Transportation
projects and assets, we evaluated long-lived assets for these operations under SFAS No. 144 based on
projections of future discounted cash flows from these assets in 2006 and an estimated selling
price for the assets held for sale by using a weighted probability cash flow analysis based on
managements estimates. These estimates are subject to change in the future and if we are not able
to sell these projects and assets at the estimated selling price or our cash flow changes because
of changes in economic conditions, growth rates or terminal values, we may incur additional
impairment charges in the future related to these operations.
During the second quarter of 2006, we determined that sufficient indicators of impairment
existed in connection with the state Department of Transportation projects and assets. As a result,
$20.8 million non-cash impairment charge was recorded for the
estimated sales price and disposition of the state Department of
Transportation projects and assets. This impairment charge is included
in discontinued operations.
Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an infinite useful
life is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. In accordance with SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we conduct, on at least an annual basis, a review
of our reporting entities to determine whether the carrying values of goodwill exceed the fair
market value using a discounted cash flow methodology for each entity. Should this be the case, the
value of our goodwill may be impaired and written down.
We could record additional impairment losses if, in the future, profitability and cash flows
of our reporting units decline to the point where the carrying value of those units exceed their
market value.
In the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded $23.5 million of goodwill in connection
with the DSSI acquisition.
Insurance Reserves
We presently maintain insurance policies subject to per claim deductibles of $2 million for
our workers compensation policy, $2 million for our general liability policy and $3 million for
our automobile liability policy. We have excess umbrella coverages of up to $100 million per claim
and in the aggregate. We also maintain an insurance policy with respect to employee group health
claims subject to per claim deductibles of $300,000. We actuarially determine any liabilities for
unpaid claims and associated expenses, including incurred but not reported losses, and reflect
those liabilities in our balance sheet as other current and non-current liabilities. The
determination of such claims and expenses and the appropriateness of the related liability is
reviewed and updated quarterly. During the six months ended
June 30, 2006, we changed the discount factor used in estimating our actuarial insurance reserves for
the workers compensation, general and automobile liability policies from 3.5% to 4.5% as of March 31, 2006, and from 4.5% to 5.2% as of June 30, 2006 to better
reflect current market conditions and to use a discount factor more in line with the market rate we
are receiving on our investments. The changes in discount factor resulted in a decrease in insurance
reserves of $1.9 million.
We are required to periodically post letters of credit and provide cash collateral to our
insurance carriers and surety companies. Total outstanding letters of credit amounted to $66.5
million at June 30, 2006 and $57.6 million as of December 31, 2005, of which $48.2 million and
$41.8 million were outstanding to support our casualty and medical insurance requirements at June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Cash collateral posted amounted to $24.6 million at
June 30, 2006 and $24.8 million as of December 31, 2005. The 2006 increase in collateral for our
insurance programs is related to additional collateral provided to the insurance carrier for the
2006 plan year in the amount of $8.9 million of letters of credit slightly offset by a $0.2 million
reduction in cash collateral for prior year insurance programs. We may be required to post
additional collateral in the future which may reduce our liquidity, or pay increased insurance
premiums, which could decrease our profitability.
Stock Compensation
In the first quarter of 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123R). This Statement requires companies to expense
the estimated fair value of stock options and similar equity instruments issued to employees over
the vesting period in their statement of operations.
25
SFAS 123R eliminates the alternative to use the intrinsic method of accounting provided for in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), which generally resulted in no compensation
expense recorded in the financial statements related to the grant of stock options to employees if
certain conditions were met.
We adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective method effective January 1, 2006, which
requires us to record compensation expense over the vesting period for all awards granted after
the date of adoption, and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain
outstanding at the date of adoption. Accordingly, amounts presented for periods prior to January 1,
2006 have not been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS 123R. However, the pro forma effect for
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 is disclosed in Note 3(i) in Part 1. Item 1
Financial Statements, consistent with prior accounting rules.
The fair value concepts were not changed significantly in SFAS 123R; however, in adopting this
Standard, companies must choose among alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions.
After assessing alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions, we will continue using
the Black-Scholes valuation model and have elected to use the ratable method to amortize
compensation expense over the vesting period of the grant.
Total non-cash stock compensation expense related to unvested stock options for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 amounted to $1.7 million which is included in general and administrative
expenses. Total non-cash stock compensation expense related to unvested stock options for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 amounted to $2.9 million, of which $0.2 million was included in loss
from discontinued operations and $2.7 million is included in general and administrative expenses.
Valuation of Equity Investments
We have one investment which we account for by the equity method because we own 49% of the
entity and we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operational policies of
the entity. Our share of the earnings or losses in this investment is included in other income,
net, in the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2006, our
investment exceeded the net equity of such investment and accordingly the excess is considered to
be equity goodwill. We periodically evaluate the equity goodwill for impairment under Accounting
Principles Board No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, as
amended. We recognized approximately $1,207,000 and $347,000 of investment income in the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1,563,000 and $562,000 of investment income
in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Income Taxes
We record income taxes using the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequence of temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of our
assets and liabilities. We estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we
operate. This process involves estimating our tax exposure together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and
accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are
included within our consolidated balance sheet. The recording of a net deferred tax asset assumes
the realization of such asset in the future. Otherwise a valuation allowance must be recorded to
reduce this asset to its net realizable value. We consider future pretax income and ongoing prudent
and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for such a valuation allowance. In the
event that we determine that we may not be able to realize all or part of the net deferred tax
asset in the future, a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset is charged against income in
the period such determination is made.
As
a result of our operating losses, we have recorded valuation
allowances aggregating $46.0
million and $33.9 million as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, to reduce
certain of our net deferred Federal, foreign and state tax assets to their estimated net realizable
value. We anticipate that we will generate sufficient pretax income in the future to realize our
deferred tax assets. In the event that our future pretax operating income is insufficient for us to
use our deferred tax assets, we have based our determination that the deferred tax assets are
still realizable based on feasible tax planning strategies that are available to us involving the
sale of one or more of our operations.
26
Litigation and Contingencies
Litigation and contingencies are reflected in our condensed unaudited consolidated financial
statements based on our assessments, with legal counsel, of the expected outcome of such litigation
or expected resolution of such contingency. If the final outcome of such litigation and
contingencies differs significantly from our current expectations, such outcome could result in a
charge to earnings. See Note 9 to our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements in Part
I Item 1 and Part II Item 1 to this Form 10-Q for description of legal proceedings and commitments
and contingencies.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Quarterly Results
The following table reflects our consolidated results of operations in dollar and percentage
of revenue terms for the periods indicated. This table includes the reclassification for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 of the net loss for the state Department of Transportation
related projects and assets to discontinued operations from the prior
period presentation (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
232,100 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
209,660 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
450,852 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
403,636 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Costs of revenue, excluding depreciation |
|
|
198,125 |
|
|
|
85.4 |
% |
|
|
182,435 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
% |
|
|
390,082 |
|
|
|
86.5 |
% |
|
|
359,512 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
8,714 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
17,373 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
14,031 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
33,968 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
28,876 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
4,710 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
9,566 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Other income, net |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before minority interest |
|
|
12,402 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
15,877 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Minority interest |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
)% |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
12,079 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
15,683 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(35,736 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
)% |
|
|
(4,043 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
(43,564 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
)% |
|
|
(10,614 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(23,657 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,116 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
$ |
(27,881 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
(10,898 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
Revenue. Our revenue was $232.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
$209.7 million for the same period in 2005, representing an increase of $22.4 million or 10.7%.
This increase was due primarily to the increased revenue of approximately $18.1 million received
from DIRECTV due to increased installations and increased market share from the DSSI acquisition.
Revenue from BellSouth also increased by $5.2 million mostly attributed to work we were awarded for
central office installations. We also experienced an increase in general business activity from
other customers in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005. These increases
in revenue were partially offset by a decrease in revenue of $7.3 million from Verizon, which was
mostly attributable to the timing of generating work orders. In the three months ended June 30,
2005, the volume of fiber-to-the-home installations of work orders was high whereas in the three
months ended June 30, 2006, the installations have normalized. We expect the Verizon revenue to
increase in future quarters as additional work orders are approved.
Costs of Revenue. Our costs of revenue were $198.1 million or 85.4% of revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $182.4 million or 87.0% of revenue for the same period in
2005 reflecting an improvement in margins. The improvement in margins was due to a decrease in
subcontractor expense as a percentage of revenue combined with operational payroll increasing at a
lower rate as a percentage of revenue. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we continued
to reduce the use of subcontractors without hiring a proportional number of additional employees.
These decreases were partially offset by increases in fuel costs. Fuel costs as a percentage of
revenue in the three
27
months ended June 30, 2006 was 3.8% compared to 3.0% in the three months ended June 30,
2005. These increases in fuel costs as a percentage of revenue are a direct result of the rising
fuel costs during the period.
Depreciation. Depreciation was $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared
to $4.2 million for the same period in 2005, representing a decrease of $742,000 or 17.5%. We
reduced depreciation expense in the three months ended June 30, 2006 by continuing to reduce
capital expenditures by entering into operating leases for our fleet requirements. We also continue
to dispose of excess equipment. During the three months ended
June 30, 2006, we entered into several capital lease agreements
to finance various machinery and equipment totaling
$6.5 million. As a result, depreciation expense is expected to
increase in the future.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were $17.4 million or
7.5% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $14.0 million or 6.7% of
revenue for the same period in 2005, representing an increase of $3.3 million or 23.8%. This
increase is attributable to non-cash stock compensation, additional personnel, and legal
expenditures. Non-cash stock compensation expense was $2.0 million, or 0.9% of revenue for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.2 million, of revenue for the same period in 2005
representing an increase of $1.8 million. Effective January 1, 2006, we account for our stock-based
award plans in accordance with SFAS 123R (revised 2005), Share Based Payment, which requires us
to expense over the vesting period the fair-value of stock options and other equity-based
compensation issued to employees. In accordance with SFAS 123R, we expensed $1.7 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2006 related to unvested stock options. In addition, we recorded
approximately $361,000 related to restricted stock awards during the three months ended June 30,
2006. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, we expensed $117,900 related to restricted stock
awards. Had we adopted SFAS 123R in 2005, we would have been required to expense $998,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2005. See the pro forma compensation expense disclosure in Note 3(i) to
our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements. The increase in general and
administrative expenses was also due to hiring additional personnel to address increased business
activity. Furthermore, we incurred additional legal expenses of approximately $1.4 million during
the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. These increases were
slightly offset by a decrease in insurance expenses resulting from improved claims and loss history
during the second quarter of 2006, as well as a reduction in our insurance reserve based on a
change of the discount factor. During the three month period ended
June 30, 2006, we increased our estimate related to the discount
factor used for estimating actuarial insurance reserves from 4.5% to 5.2% to reflect current market
conditions and to use a discount factor more in line with the market interest rate we receive on
our investments.
Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net of interest income was $2.3 million or 1.0% of
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $4.7 million or 2.3% of revenue for
the same period in 2005 representing a decrease of approximately $2.4 million or 50.4%. The
decrease was due to lower rates charged during the period under our Credit Facility based on our
improved operating performance and the 2006 Amendment, as well as a reduction in interest expense
due to our redemption of $75.0 million principal of our 7.75% senior subordinated notes on March 2,
2006. In addition, the decrease in interest expense, net was due to the higher interest income we
earned during the period as a result of investing the remaining net proceeds from our January 2006
equity offering and higher interest rates earned on our invested funds.
Other income, net. Other income, net was $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30,
2006, compared to $1.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005, representing an increase of
$0.3 million or 27.0%. The increase mainly relates to the equity income we recognized on our 49%
investment in a limited liability company. This increase was
partially offset by reduced gains on
sale of fixed assets in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005.
Minority interest. Minority interest for GlobeTec Construction, LLC resulted in a charge of
$323,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a charge $356,000 for the same
period in 2005 representing a decrease of $33,000. The joint venture experienced a slight decline
in business in the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to
certain jobs incurring higher costs in order to complete them more rapidly.
Discontinued operations. The loss on discontinued operations, which includes our Brazilian and
network services operations, as well as our operations of the state Department of Transportation
related projects and assets, was $35.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
$4.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The net loss for our Brazilian operations
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was approximately $30,000 and was attributable to legal
fees related to the Brazilian operations bankruptcy proceedings. The net loss for our network
services operations decreased to $17,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from a net loss
of $1.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of the winding down of the network services
operations. The loss in the three months ended June 30, 2006 is mostly attributable to overhead
personnel and legal costs in winding down the operations. In addition, discontinued operations
include the net loss of our state Department of Transportation related projects and assets which amounted to $35.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared to a net loss of $3.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The net loss
increased due to an impairment charge and operational cost overruns and inefficiencies on certain
existing projects. During the second
28
quarter of
2006, we determined there were sufficient indicators of impairment to the carrying value of the
underlying net assets of the state Department of Transportation projects and assets.
As a result, $20.8 million non-cash impairment charge was
recorded for the estimated sales price and disposition of the state Department of Transportation projects and assets. All impairment
charges are included in discontinued operations. In addition to the non-cash impairment charge, the
loss during the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the three months ended June 30,
2005 included increased legal expenses of approximately $1.0 million and bad debt expense of
approximately $0.6 million.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Revenue. Our revenue was $450.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to
$403.6 million for the same period in 2005, representing an increase of $47.3 million or 11.7%.
This increase was due primarily to the increased revenue of approximately $38.9 million received
from DIRECTV due to increased installations and increased market share from the DSSI acquisition
and an increase in revenue of $15.3 million from BellSouth mostly attributed to work we were
awarded for central office installations. We also experienced an increase in general business
activity from other customers in the six month period ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same
period of 2005. These increases in revenue were partially offset by a decrease in revenue of $18.0
million from Verizon mostly attributed to the timing of generating work orders. In the six months
ended June 30, 2005 the fiber-to-the-home installations had just commenced and the volume of work
orders were high whereas in the six months ended June 30, 2006 the installations have normalized.
We expect the Verizon revenue to increase in future quarters as additional work orders are
approved.
Costs of Revenue. Our costs of revenue were $390.1 million or 86.5% of revenue for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $359.5 million or 89.1% of revenue for the same period in
2005 reflecting an improvement in margins. The improvement in margins was due to a decrease in
subcontractor expense as a percentage of revenue with operational payroll only slightly increasing
as a percentage of revenue. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we continued to reduce the
use of subcontractors without hiring a proportional number of additional employees. These
decreases were partially offset by increases in fuel costs. Fuel costs as a percentage of revenue
in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 3.6% compared to 2.8% in the six months ended June 30,
2005. These increases in fuel costs as a percentage of revenue are a direct result of the rising
fuel costs during the period.
Depreciation. Depreciation was $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared
to $8.7 million for the same period in 2005, representing a decrease of $1.6 million or 19.0%. We
reduced depreciation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2006 by continuing to reduce capital
expenditures by entering into operating leases for fleet requirements. We also continue to dispose
of excess equipment in 2006. However, depreciation expense is
expected to increase in the future as a result of several capital lease agreements
we entered into during the six month period ended June 30, 2006
to finance various machinery and equipment totaling $6.5 million.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were $34.0 million or
7.5% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $28.9 million or 7.1% of
revenue for the same period in 2005, representing an increase of $5.1 million or 17.6%. This
increase is attributable to non-cash stock compensation; additional personnel; and legal
expenditures. Non-cash stock compensation expense was $3.2 million or 0.7% of revenue for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $211,000 of revenue for the same period in 2005
representing an increase of $3.0 million. Effective January 1, 2006, we account for our stock-based
award plans in accordance with SFAS 123R (revised 2005) Share Based Payment which requires us to
expense over the vesting period the fair-value of stock options and other equity-based compensation
issued to employees. In accordance with SFAS 123R, we expensed $2.7 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2006 related to unvested stock options and restricted stock awards. In addition, we
recorded approximately $529,600 related to restricted stock awards during the six months ended June
30, 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, we expensed $142,000 related to restricted stock
awards. Had we adopted SFAS 123R in 2005, we would have been required to expense $2.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2005. See the pro forma compensation expense disclosure in Note 3(i)
to our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements. The increase in general and
administrative expenses was also due to hiring additional personnel to address increased business
activity. Furthermore, we incurred additional legal expenses of approximately $1.6 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. These increases in general
and administrative expenses were partially offset by decreases in insurance expense and
professional fees. There has been a reduction in insurance expense as a result of improved claims
and loss history during 2006, as well as a reduction in our insurance reserve based on a change to
the discount factor used for estimating actuarial insurance reserves. The discount factor was
changed from 3.5% to 5.2% to reflect current market conditions and to use a discount factor more in
line with the market interest rate we receive on our investments.
29
Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net of interest income was $5.8 million or 1.3% of
revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $9.6 million or 2.4% of revenue for the
same period in 2005 representing a decrease of approximately $3.8 million or 39.0%. The decrease
was due to lower rates charged during the period under our Credit Facility based on our improved
operating performance and the 2006 Amendment, as well as a reduction in interest expense due to our
redemption of $75.0 million principal of our 7.75% senior subordinated notes on March 2, 2006. In
addition, the decrease in interest expense, net was due to the higher interest income we earned
during the period as a result of investing the remaining net proceeds from our January 2006 equity
offering and higher interest rates earned on our invested funds.
Other income, net. Other income, net was $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to $3.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, representing a decrease of $1.2
million or 37.9%. The decrease mainly relates to higher gains on sale of fixed assets during the
six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period of 2006. This decrease is partially
offset by an increase in the equity income we recognize on our 49% investment in a limited
liability company.
Minority interest. Minority interest for GlobeTec Construction, LLC resulted in a charge of
$194,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to a
charge of $422,000 for the same period
in 2005 representing a decrease of $228,000. The joint venture experienced a slight decline in
business in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to certain
jobs incurring higher costs in order to complete them more rapidly.
Discontinued operations. The loss on discontinued operations, which includes our Brazilian and
network services operations, as well as our operations of the state Department of Transportation
related projects and assets, was $43.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
$10.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. The net loss for our Brazilian operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $82,000 and was attributable to legal fees related to the
Brazilian operations bankruptcy proceedings. The net loss for our network services operations
decreased to $114,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006
from a net loss of $1.4 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of the winding down of the network services operations. The
loss in the six months ended June 30, 2006 is mostly attributable to overhead personnel and legal
costs in winding down the operations. In addition, discontinued operations include the net loss of
our state Department of Transportation related projects and assets which amounted to $43.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to a
net loss of $9.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005. The net loss increased due to
an impairment charge and operational cost overruns and inefficiencies on certain existing projects. During the second
quarter of 2006, we determined there were sufficient indicators of impairment to the carrying value of the
underlying net assets of the state Department of Transportation projects and assets. As a result, $20.8 million non-cash
impairment charge was recorded for the estimated selling price and
disposition of the state Department of
Transportation projects and assets. All impairment charges are included in discontinued operations.
In addition to the impairment charge, the loss during the six months ended June 30, 2006 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005 included increased legal expenses of approximately
$2.2 million and bad debt expense of approximately $1.5 million. In addition, we had increased
operating expenses related to stock compensation expense of
$242,000 related to a terminated
executive, duplication of back-office functions in order to ensure an easier transition and moving
costs related to the consolidation of office space.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
On January 24, 2006, we completed a public offering of 14,375,000 shares of our common stock
at $11.50 per share. The net proceeds from the sale were approximately $156.5 million after
deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. We used $18.5 million of the net proceeds
for the cash portion of the purchase price for the DSSI acquisition, as described below. On March
2, 2006, we used $75.5 million of the net proceeds of the public offering to redeem a portion of
our 7.75% senior subordinated notes due February 2008, including the payment of related interest.
We expect to use the remaining net proceeds for working capital, other possible acquisitions of
assets and businesses, organic growth and other general corporate purposes.
In addition to the public offering we completed in the first quarter of 2006, our primary
sources of liquidity are cash flows from continuing operations, borrowings under our credit
facility, capital leases and proceeds from sales of assets and investments. Our primary liquidity
needs are for working capital, capital expenditures, insurance collateral in the form of cash and
letters of credit, equity investment obligations and debt service. In January 2006, we issued a
$6.5 million letter of credit to our insurance carrier related to our 2006 insurance plans. At the
present time, we have no other commitments to issue additional collateral in 2006 related to our
insurance policies. Following the March redemption of $75.0 million principal amount of
subordinated notes, our semi-annual interest payments on our senior subordinated
30
notes was reduced to approximately $5.4 million. In addition to ordinary course working capital requirements, we
estimate spending between $20.0 million and $40.0 million per year on capital expenditures in order
to keep our equipment new and in good condition in order for them to operate efficiently. We will,
however, because of our improved financial condition, continue to evaluate lease versus buy
decisions to meet our equipment needs and based on this evaluation our capital expenditures may
increase in 2006 from this estimate. We are also re-negotiating existing leases and will be
entering into new leases with more favorable terms. We expect to continue to sell older vehicles
and equipment as we upgrade with new equipment and we expect to obtain proceeds from these sales in
excess of $1.0 million per quarter depending upon market conditions. From time to time, we engage
in a review and analysis of our performance to our key strategic objectives. In connection with
this process, we consider activities including the sale or divestitures of portions of our assets,
operations, real estate or other properties. Any actions taken may impact our liquidity.
We have a 49% interest in a limited liability company. The purchase price for this investment
was an initial amount of $3.7 million which was paid in four quarterly installments of $925,000. As
of June 30, 2006, six additional contingent quarterly payments are expected to be made to the third
party from which the interest was purchased in addition to an additional purchase price payment
contingent on certain performance. The contingent payments will be up to a maximum of $1.3 million
per quarter based on the level of unit sales and profitability of the limited liability company in
specified preceding quarters. Three contingent quarterly payments, each of $925,000, were made on
January 10, 2006, April 10, 2006 and July 11, 2006. In March 2006, we also made an additional
capital contribution of $980,000.
We
require working capital to support seasonal variations in our business, primarily due to the
impact of weather conditions on external construction and maintenance work, including storm
restoration work, and the corresponding spending by our customers on their annual capital
expenditure budgets. Our business is typically slower in the first and fourth quarters of each
calendar year and stronger in the second and third quarters. We generally experience seasonal
working capital needs from approximately April through September to support growth in unbilled
revenue and accounts receivable, and to a lesser extent, inventory. Our billing terms are generally
net 30 to 60 days, although some contracts allow our customers to retain a portion (from 2% to 15%)
of the contract amount until the contract is completed to their satisfaction. We maintain inventory
to meet the material requirements of some of our contracts. Some of our customers pay us in advance
for a portion of the materials we purchase for their projects, or allow us to pre-bill them for
materials purchases up to a specified amount.
Our vendors generally offer us terms ranging from 30 to 90 days. Our agreements with
subcontractors usually contain a pay-when-paid provision, whereby our payments to subcontractors
are made after we are paid by our customers.
We anticipate that funds generated from continuing operations, the net proceeds from our
public offering completed in the first quarter, borrowings under our credit facility, and proceeds
from sales of assets and investments will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements,
anticipated capital expenditures, insurance collateral requirements, equity investment obligations,
letters of credit and debt service obligations for at least the next twelve months.
As
of June 30, 2006, we had $180.6 million in working capital compared to $135.1 million as of
December 31, 2005. Cash and cash equivalents increased from $2.0 million at December 31, 2005 to
$62.6 million at June 30, 2006 mainly due to the proceeds received from the public offering offset
by payments made in connection with the redemption of $75.0 million principal on our senior
subordinated notes and $18.5 million cash purchase price paid in connection with the DSSI
acquisition.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $10.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006 compared to a use of $14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The net cash
provided by operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily related to the timing of cash payments to vendors and
cash collections from customers. Even though the net loss incurred during the six month period
ended June 30, 2006 was higher than the comparable period of
2005, this increase in the net loss
was offset by non-cash charges for impairment and stock compensation
and therefore improved the net cash provided by operating activities. The net use of cash in operating
activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 was mainly attributed to the net loss incurred
during the period and the increase in accounts receivable, unbilled revenues and retainage, in
addition to the cash collateral payments of $9.0 million required by our insurance carrier.
Net
cash used in investing activities was $30.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to net cash used in investing activities of $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. Net cash used in investing activities
31
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily related to cash payments made in connection with the DSSI acquisition of $19.3 million, capital
expenditures in the amount of $10.3 million and payments related to our equity investment in the
amount of $2.8 million offset by $1.9 million in net proceeds from sales of assets. Net cash
used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 primarily related to $3.9
million used for capital expenditures and $2.4 million related to our equity investment offset by
$4.4 million in net proceeds from the sale of assets.
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $80.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006 compared to $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Net cash provided by
financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily related to net proceeds
from the issuance of common stock of $156.5 million and proceeds from the issuance of common stock
pursuant to stock option exercises in the amount of $3.4 million partially offset by the redemption
of $75.0 million principal on our senior subordinated notes and
payments on borrowings of $3.8 million. Net cash provided by financing
activities in the six months ended June 30, 2005 was mainly due to proceeds from the issuance of
common stock of $1.2 million.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, we entered into several capital lease
arrangements to finance the acquisition of $6.5 million of equipment and machinery.
Cash used in discontinued operations in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $20.4 million.
This mainly consisted of $20.6 million in cash used in operating activities, mostly attributed to our
net loss from these operations. We expect cash flow from discontinued operations to be
positive in the future based on cash flows expected in 2006 and our estimated selling price for our
state Department and Transportation projects and assets. However, this expectation may not be
realized if we are not able to sell these projects and assets at our estimated selling price or our
cash flow changes because of changes in economic conditions.
We have a secured revolving credit facility for our operations which was amended and restated
on May 10, 2005 increasing the maximum amount of availability from $125 million to $150 million
subject to reserves of $5.0 million, and other adjustments and restrictions. The costs related to
this amendment were $2.6 million which are being amortized over the life of the credit facility.
The credit facility expires on May 10, 2010. These deferred financing costs are included in prepaid
expenses and other current assets and other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. Based on our
improved financial position, on May 8, 2006, we were able to amend our credit facility to reduce
the interest rate margins charged on borrowings and letters of credit. This amendment also
increases the permitted maximum purchase price of an acquisition, increases permitted receivable
concentration of certain customers, increases the permitted capital expenditures and debt baskets,
and reduces the required minimum fixed charge coverage ratio if net availability falls below $20.0
million.
The amount that we can borrow at any given time is based upon a formula that takes into
account, among other things, eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and equipment which
can result in borrowing availability of less than the full amount of the credit facility. As of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, net availability under
the credit facility totaled $47.9
million and $55.4 million, respectively, which included outstanding standby letters of credit
aggregating $66.5 million and $57.6 million in each period,
respectively. At June 30, 2006, $48.2
million of the outstanding letters of credit were issued to support our casualty and medical
insurance requirements. These letters of credit mature at various dates
through August 2006 and most have automatic renewal provisions subject to prior notice of
cancellation. The credit facility is collateralized by a first priority security interest in
substantially all of our assets and a pledge of the stock of certain of the operating subsidiaries.
All wholly-owned subsidiaries collateralize the facility. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
we had outstanding cash draws under the credit facility in the amount of $0 and $4.2 million,
respectively. Interest under the credit facility accrues at rates based,
at our option, on the agent banks base rate plus a margin of between 0.0% and 0.75% or the LIBOR
rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus a margin of between 1.25% and 2.25%, depending on
certain financial thresholds. The credit facility includes an unused facility fee of 0.375%, which
may be adjusted to as low as 0.250%.
If the net availability under the credit facility is under $20.0 million on any given day, we
are required to be in compliance with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio measured on a monthly
basis and certain events are triggered. Our operations are required to comply with this fixed
charge coverage coverage ratio if these conditions of availability are not met. The credit facility
further provides that once net availability is greater than or equal to $20.0 million for 90
consecutive days, the fixed charge coverage ratio will no longer apply. The fixed charge coverage
ratio is generally defined to mean the ratio of our net income before interest expense, income tax
expense, depreciation expense, and
32
amortization expense minus net capital expenditures and cash
taxes paid to the sum of all interest expense plus current maturities of debt for the period. The
financial covenant was not applicable as of June 30, 2006, because at that time net availability
under the credit facility was $47.9 million and net availability did not reduce below $20.0 million
on any given day during the period.
Based upon the amendment of the credit facility, our current availability, net proceeds from
the sale of common stock, liquidity and projections for 2006, we believe we will be in compliance
with the credit facilitys terms and conditions and the minimum availability requirements for the
remainder of 2006. We are dependent upon borrowings and letters of credit under this credit
facility to fund operations. Should we be unable to comply with the terms and conditions of the
credit facility, we would be required to obtain modifications to the credit facility or another
source of financing to continue to operate. We may not be able to achieve its 2006 projections and
this may adversely affect its ability to remain in compliance with the credit facilitys minimum
net availability requirements and minimum fixed charge ratio in the future.
Our variable rate credit facility exposes us to interest rate risk. However, we had no cash
borrowings outstanding under the credit facility at June 30, 2006.
As of June 30, 2006, $121.0 million of our 7.75% senior subordinated notes due in February
2008, with interest due semi-annually were outstanding. The notes contain default (including
cross-default) provisions and covenants restricting many of the same transactions as under our
credit facility. The indenture which governs our senior subordinated notes allows us to incur the
following additional indebtedness among others: the credit facility (up to $150 million), renewals
to existing debt permitted under the indenture plus an additional $25 million of indebtedness among
others: the indenture prohibits incurring further indebtedness unless our fixed charge coverage
ratio is at least 2:1 for the four most recently ended fiscal quarters determined on a pro forma
basis as if that additional debt has been incurred at the beginning of the period. The definition
of our fixed charge coverage ratio under the indenture is essentially equivalent to that under our
credit facility.
Some of our contracts require us to provide performance and payment bonds, which we obtain
from a surety company. If we were unable to meet our contractual obligations to a customer and the
surety paid our customer the amount due under the bond, the surety would seek reimbursement of such
payment from us. At June 30, 2006, the cost to complete on our
$283.9 million performance and
payment bonds was $64.2 million.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 13 to our condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements in Part 1 Item 1 to
this Form 10-Q for certain new accounting pronouncements.
Seasonality
Our operations are historically seasonally slower in the first and fourth quarters of the
year. This seasonality is primarily the result of client budgetary constraints and preferences and
the effect of winter weather on network activities. Some of our clients, particularly the incumbent
local exchange carriers, tend to complete budgeted capital expenditures before the end of the year
and defer additional expenditures until the following budget year.
Impact of Inflation
The primary inflationary factor affecting our operations is increased labor costs. We are also
affected by changes in fuel costs which increased significantly in 2006 and 2005.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. Our variable rate credit facility exposes us to interest rate risk.
However, we had no cash borrowings under the credit facility at June 30, 2006.
33
Interest Rate Risk
Less than 1% of our outstanding debt at June 30, 2006 was subject to variable interest rates.
The remainder of our debt has fixed interest rates. Our fixed interest rate debt includes $121.0
million (face value) in senior subordinated notes. The carrying value and market value of our debt
at June 30, 2006 was $121.0 million and $120.7 million, respectively. Based upon debt
balances outstanding at June 30, 2006, a 100 basis point (i.e. 1%) addition to our weighted average
effective interest rate for variable rate debt would increase our interest expense by less than
$100,000 on an annual basis.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have an investment in a subsidiary in Canada and sell our services into this foreign
market.
Our foreign net asset/exposure (defined as assets denominated in foreign currency less
liabilities denominated in foreign currency) for Canada at June 30, 2006 of U.S. dollar equivalents
was a net liability of $1.2 million as of June 30, 2006 compared to a net asset of $1.5 million at
December 31, 2005.
Our Canada subsidiary sells services and pays for products and services in Canadian dollars. A
decrease in the Canadian foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely impact our
margins. An assumed 10% depreciation of the foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar over the
three months ended June 30, 2006 (i.e., in addition to actual exchange experience) would have
resulted in a translation reduction of our revenue by $144,000 and $248,000 in the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
As the assets, liabilities and transactions of our Canada subsidiary are denominated in
Canadian dollars, the results and financial condition are subject to translation adjustments upon
their conversion into U.S. dollars for our financial reporting purposes. A 10% decline in this
foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar over the course of the three months ended June 30,
2006 (i.e., in addition to actual exchange experience) would have resulted in a reduction in our
foreign subsidiaries translated operating loss of $20,000 and
$67,000 in the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
further disclosures about market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended). Based upon that evaluation, we concluded that as of June 30, 2006, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding
required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15
that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Set forth below is information with respect to those legal proceedings which became a
reportable event, or as to which there had been material developments, in the quarter ended June
30, 2006.
34
In June 2006, prior to arbitration on a claim brought by MasTec for payments due from ABB
Power (ABB), we settled all differences between MasTec and ABB in exchange for partial payment to
MasTec from ABB.
We brought an action against NextiraOne Federal in the Federal Court in Eastern District of
Virginia, to recover payment for services rendered in connection with a state Department of
Transportation project, which is included in discontinued operations, on a network wiring contract.
NextiraOne counterclaimed for offsets and remediation. On May 4, 2006, the Judge ruled from the
bench that we failed to establish an entitlement to recover damages for contract work done, and
that NextiraOne Federal failed to establish an entitlement to recover costs of alleged offsets and
costs of remediation. We expect a formal order and judgment on these issues from the court shortly
after the date of filing of this report. We believe the ruling is an error, and we have sought
remedy on appeal. We may be unable to obtain relief without additional expenses.
In April 2006, we settled, without payment to the plaintiffs by us, several complaints for
purported securities class actions that were filed against us and certain officers in the second
quarter of 2004. While we believe that we would have ultimately been successful in defense of these
actions, given the amount of the settlement, the inherent risk of uncertainty of the legal
proceedings, and the substantial time and expense of defending these proceedings, we concluded that
entering into the settlement was the appropriate course of action. On June 30, 2006, the parties
executed a Stipulation of Settlement and filed a Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of the
settlement of the federal securities class action. The settlement is contingent upon final approval
by the Court. The Court scheduled a preliminary hearing on the approval of the settlement for
August 15, 2006. If the settlement is preliminarily approved, the Court will schedule a final
fairness hearing to determine whether the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. As part of the
settlement, our excess insurance carrier has retained its rights to seek reimbursement of up to
$2.0 million from us based on its claim that notice was not properly given under the policy. We
believe these claims are without merit and plan to continue vigorously defending this action. We
also believe that they have claims against the insurance broker for any losses arising from the
notice.
The
parties in the shareholder derivative action, which is based on the
same factual predicate as the purported federal securities class
action and related SEC informal inquiry, have executed a memorandum of understanding
and are presently finalizing the stipulation of settlement. Once executed, the stipulation of
settlement will be filed with the Court for final approval.
The SEC is conducting an informal fact-finding inquiry related to the restatements of MasTecs
financial statements. We are fully cooperating with the SEC. We have voluntarily produced documents
to the SEC. The SEC is currently conducting interviews in connection with this inquiry.
In October 2005, eleven former employees filed a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective
action against MasTec in the Federal District Court in Tampa, Florida, alleging failure to pay
overtime wages as required under that Act. The matter is currently stayed and under investigation.
We do not believe MasTec is liable under the FLSA as alleged in the complaint. We plan to vigorously
defend this lawsuit, but may be unable to successfully resolve this dispute without incurring
significant expenses. Due to the early stage of this proceeding, potential loss, if any, cannot be
determined.
During construction of a natural gas pipeline project in Oregon in 2003, MasTec and its
customer, Coos County, Oregon, were cited for violations of the Clean Water Act by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers). Despite protracted negotiations, the parties were
unable to settle these complaints. On March 30, 2006, the Corps of Engineers filed suit against us and Coos County in Federal District Court in Oregon. We
intend to defend this action vigorously, but may be unable to do so without incurring significant
expenses. Due to the early stage of this proceeding, potential loss, if any, cannot be determined.
In connection with the same project, a complaint alleging failure to comply with prevailing
wage requirements was filed against us by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry. This matter was
filed with the state court in Coos County. We intend to defend this action vigorously, but may be
unable to do so without incurring significant expenses. Due to the early stage of this litigation,
any potential loss cannot presently be determined.
The potential loss for all unresolved Coos Bay matters and unpaid settlements reached
described above is estimated to be $125,000 at June 30, 2006, which has been recorded in the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as accrued expenses.
35
In June 2005, we posted a $2.3 million bond in order to pursue the appeal of a $1.7 million
final judgment entered June 30, 2005 against us for damages plus attorneys fees resulting from a
break in a Citgo pipeline. We are seeking a new trial and reduction in the damages award. We will continue
to contest this matter in the appellate court, and on subsequent retrial. The amount of the loss,
if any, relating to this matter not covered by insurance is estimated to be $100,000 to $2.4
million, of which $100,000 is recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2006, as accrued expenses.
We are also a party to other pending legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business. While complete assurance cannot be given as to the outcome of any legal claims,
management believes that any financial impact would not be material to its results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In the course of operations, we are subject to certain risk factors, including but not limited
to, risks related to rapid technological and structural changes in the industries we serve, the
volume of work received from clients, contract cancellations on short notice, operating strategies,
economic downturn, collectibility of receivables, significant fluctuations in quarterly results,
effect of continued efforts to streamline operations, management of growth, dependence on key
personnel, availability of qualified employees, competition, recoverability of goodwill, and
deferred taxes and potential exposures to environmental liabilities and political and economic
instability in foreign operations. See Risk Factors in our most recently filed Annual Report on
Form 10-K for a complete description of these risk factors.
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to any of the risk factors
disclosed in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We may incur costs due to complaints that were filed against us and certain of our officers.
In the second quarter of 2004, several complaints for a purported securities class action were
filed against us and certain of our officers. We have settled these actions without payments to the
plaintiffs by us. As part of the settlement, our excess insurance carrier has retained its rights
to seek up to $2.0 million in reimbursement from us based on its claim that notice was not properly
given under the policy. The parties in the shareholder derivative
action, which is based on the same factual predicate as the purported
securities class action and the related SEC informal inquiry, have
executed a memorandum of understanding and are presently finalizing
the stipulation of settlement. Once executed, the stipulation of
settlement will be filed with the Court for final approval. We may be unable
to successfully resolve these disputes without incurring significant expenses. See Part II. Item
1. Legal Proceedings.
We derive a significant portion of our revenue from a few customers, and the loss of one of these
customers or a reduction in their demand, the amount they pay or their ability to pay, for our
services could impair our financial performance.
In the three months ended June 30, 2006, we derived approximately 33.9% and 10.9% of our
revenue from DIRECTV® and BellSouth, respectively. Verizon Communications was only 8.0%
of our revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2006. During the six months ended June 30, 2006,
we derived approximately 35.8% and 12.1% of our revenue from DIRECTV® and BellSouth,
respectively. Verizon Communications was only 7.7% of our revenue in the six months ended June 30,
2006. Because our business is concentrated among relatively few major customers, our revenue could significantly decline if we lose one or more of these customers or if the amount
of business from Verizon continues to reduce, which could result in reduced profitability and
liquidity.
The adoption of SFAS 123R has had a significant impact on our results of operations and
earnings per share.
Prior to January 2006, we accounted for our stock-based award plans to employees and directors
in accordance with APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees under which compensation
expense is recorded to the extent that the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the
exercise price. Under this method, we generally did not recognize any compensation related to
employee stock option grants we issued under our stock option plans at fair value. In December 2004,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 123R Share-Based Payment or SFAS 123R. This
statement, which was effective for us beginning on January 1,
2006, requires us to recognize the
expense attributable to stock options granted or vested subsequent to December 31, 2005 and had a
material negative impact on our profitability of $1.7 million in the three months ended June 30,
2006 or $0.02 diluted earnings per share, and $2.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 or
$0.04 diluted earnings per share.
36
SFAS 123R required us to recognize share-based compensation as compensation expense in our
statement of operations based on the fair values of such equity on the date of the grant, with the
compensation expense recognized over the vesting period. This statement also required us to adopt a
fair value-based method for measuring the compensation expense related to share-based compensation.
Due to additional stock options granted and the value of our common stock increasing, we now expect
the annual stock compensation expense related to unvested stock options to be approximately $4.0
million in 2006. The annual share-based compensation expense still could be affected by, among
other things, additional stock options granted to employees and directors, the volatility of our
stock price and the exercise price of the options granted.
We may incur long-lived assets impairment charges which could harm our profitability.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, we review long-lived assets for impairment. In analyzing potential
impairment of our state Department of Transportation related projects and assets we used
projections of future discounted cash flows from these assets in 2006 and estimated a selling price
by using a weighted probability cash flow analysis based on managements estimates. These estimates
are all subject to changes in the future and if we are not able to sell these projects and assets
at the estimated selling price or our cash flow changes because of changes in economic conditions,
growth rates or changes in terminal values, we may incur additional impairment charges in the
future related to these operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
We held our 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 18, 2006 at which time the holders of a
majority (42,907,574 out of the total issued and outstanding of 64,563,868) of our issued and
outstanding common stock were present and voted. Set forth below are the results of the election of
directors voted on the meeting and the results of the votes taken at the meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
|
Votes |
|
|
For |
|
Against/Withheld |
Class I
Directors (term to expire in 2008)
Ernst N. Csiszar |
|
|
45,875,346 |
|
|
|
1,032,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class II
Directors (term to expire in 2009)
Austin J. Shanfelter |
|
|
46,748,511 |
|
|
|
159,063 |
|
John Van Heuvelan |
|
|
45,696,796 |
|
|
|
1,210,778 |
|
Carlos M. de Cespedes |
|
|
46,851,778 |
|
|
|
55,796 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On August 3, 2006, MasTec entered into a renewal employment agreement with C. Robert Campbell
as the Companys Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The agreement is effective
from August 3, 2006 through August 15, 2009. The agreement provides that Mr. Campbells base salary
will be $385,000 per year and he will be eligible to participate in the Companys bonus plan for senior
management with a maximum annual bonus of up to 100% of base salary. In addition,
Mr. Campbell is awarded options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Companys common stock at the
market price as of August 3, 2006. These options vest annually over a period of 3 years. An additional
option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Companys common stock
vesting ratably over 5 years was also awarded. The
employment agreement is included as Exhibit 10-1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is
hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1*+
|
|
Renewal-Employment Agreement
C. Robert Campbell. |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 *
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q. |
+ |
|
Management contract or compensation plan arrangement. |
37
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 3, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Austin J. Shanfelter
|
|
|
Austin J. Shanfelter |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ C. Robert Campbell
|
|
|
C. Robert Campbell |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
38