Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended   JUNE 30, 2012

OR

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to         

Commission File Number:  001-12648

UFP Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

172 East Main Street, Georgetown, Massachusetts 01833, USA

(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

(978) 352-2200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x; No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x; No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o; No x

6,719,082 shares of registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding as of August 2, 2012.

Table of Contents

UFP Technologies, Inc.

Index

2

Table of Contents

PART I:               FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1:              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UFP Technologies, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

UFP Technologies, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

UFP Technologies, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

NOTES TO INTERIM

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)                   Basis of Presentation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of UFP Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) presented herein, have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and do not include all the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012, the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

(2)                   Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Cash paid for interest and income taxes is as follows:

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, the Company permitted the exercise of stock options with exercise proceeds paid with the Company’s stock (“cashless” exercises) totaling $57,046 and $93,879, respectively.

(3)                   Investment in Affiliated Partnership

In prior periods the Company had a 26.32% ownership interest in a realty limited partnership, United Development Company Limited (“UDT”).  The Company had consolidated the financial statements of UDT for prior periods because it determined that UDT was a VIE.  On February 29, 2012, the Company purchased the manufacturing building that it leased from UDT for $1,350,000, which approximates fair market value.  Since this transaction took place among commonly controlled companies, the building was recorded by the Company at UDT’s carrying value.  Thus, in effect, the Company has acquired the remaining 73.68% ownership interest in UDT, eliminating the VIE.  Subsequently, UDT was dissolved and its assets were distributed.  The non-controlling interests’ portion of the excess of the amount paid for the building over UDT’s carrying value, totaling $535,481, has been recorded in stockholders’ equity as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.  The transaction did not impact the consolidated results of operations.

6

Table of Contents

Included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, are the following amounts related to UDT:

(4)                   Fair Value Accounting

The Company has other financial instruments, such as accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, which are stated at carrying amounts that approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.  The carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value as the interest rate on the debt approximates the Company’s current incremental borrowing rate.

(5)                   Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant).

The Company issues share-based payments through several plans that are described in detail in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. The compensation cost charged against income for those plans is as follows:

Share-based compensation for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2011, include approximately $60,000 representing the fair value of the Company’s stock granted to the Board of Directors in lieu of fees.

The total income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income for share-based compensation arrangements was approximately $96,000 and $134,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively, and approximately $157,000 and $219,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

The following is a summary of stock option activity under all plans for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012:

7

Table of Contents

On June 14, 2012, the Company granted to its directors options for the purchase of 7,770 shares of its common stock at that day’s closing price of $16.32.  The compensation expense was determined as the intrinsic fair market value of the options using the Black Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions:

The stock volatility for each grant is determined based on a review of the experience of the weighted average of historical daily price changes of the Company’s common stock over the expected option term, and the risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, was $7.72.

In prior years, the Company used a lattice-based model to determine fair value.

During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, the total intrinsic value of all options exercised (i.e., the difference between the market price on the exercise date and the price paid by the employees to exercise the options) was $1,843,794 and $1,823,092, respectively, and the total amount of consideration received from the exercised options was $320,012 and $162,182, respectively.

During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, the Company recognized compensation expenses related to stock options granted to directors and employees of $79,437 and $84,467, respectively.  During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, the Company recognized compensation expenses related to stock options granted to directors and employees of $97,623 and $104,747, respectively.

On February 17, 2012, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the award of $300,000 payable in shares of common stock to the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President under the 2003 Incentive Plan.  The shares will be issued on or before December 31, 2012.  The Company has recorded compensation expense associated with the award of $75,000 and $150,000 during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012.  During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, $106,251 and $212,502 of compensation expense was recognized for a similar award.

The following table summarizes information about Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) activity during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012:

During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded compensation expense related to RSUs of $95,716 and $189,431, respectively.  The Company recorded $131,346 and $254,150, respectively, for the same periods ended June 30, 2011.

At its discretion, the Company allows option and RSU holders to surrender previously owned common stock in lieu of paying the minimum statutory withholding taxes due upon the exercise of options or the vesting of RSUs.  During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, 39,707 and 35,930 shares were surrendered at an average market price of $16.93 and $17.78, respectively.

8

Table of Contents

(6)                   Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, and consist of the following at the stated dates:

(7)                   Preferred Stock

On March 18, 2009, the Company declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to the stockholders of record on March 20, 2009.  Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Preferred Share”) of the Company, at a price of $25 per one one-thousandth of a Preferred Share subject to adjustment and the terms of the Rights Agreement.  The Rights expire on March 19, 2019.

(8)                   Income Per Share

Basic income per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.  Diluted income per share is based upon the weighted average of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during each period.

The weighted average number of shares used to compute basic and diluted net income per share consisted of the following:

The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock awards, including stock options, when the average market price of the common stock is lower than the exercise price of the related options during the period. These outstanding stock awards are not included in the computation of diluted income per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.  For both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, the number of stock awards excluded from the computation was 17,770.  For the same three- and six-month periods in 2011, the number of stock awards excluded from the computation was 3,338 and 1,678, respectively.

(9)                   Segment Reporting

The Company is organized based on the nature of the products and services it offers.  Under this structure, the Company produces products within two distinct segments: Engineered Packaging and Component Products. Within the Engineered Packaging segment, the Company primarily uses polyethylene and polyurethane foams, sheet plastics, and pulp fiber to provide customers with cushion packaging for their products.  Within the Component Products segment, the Company primarily uses cross-linked polyethylene and technical urethane foams to provide customers in the automotive, athletic, leisure, and health and beauty industries with custom-designed products for numerous purposes.

9

Table of Contents

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating income.

Inter-segment transactions are uncommon and not material. Therefore, they have not been reflected separately in the financial table below. Revenues from customers outside of the United States are not material. No customer comprised more than 5% of the Company’s consolidated revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. With the exception of one molded fiber machine currently being assembled for delivery to the Company’s Iowa facility, all of the Company’s assets are located in the United States.

ITEM 2:                       MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-looking Statements

This report contains certain statements that are “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The words “believe,”  “expect,”  “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” and other expressions, which are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and that do not relate to historical matters, identify forward-looking statements.  Examples of forward-looking statements included in this report include, without limitation, statements regarding the anticipated performance of the Company, anticipated trends in the different markets in which the Company competes, including the military and medical markets, potential effects those trends may have on the Company and its competitors, the relative strengths of the Company and its competitors to address those trends, including with regard to resources and manufacturing capacity, the anticipated impact on the Company and its revenues of the conclusion of a substantial portion of its large automotive door panel program, expected methods of growth for the Company, and the overall economy.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Other examples of these risks, uncertainties, and other factors include, without limitation, the following: economic conditions that affect sales

10

Table of Contents

of the products of the Company’s customers, risks associated with the identification of suitable acquisition candidates and the successful, efficient execution and integration of such acquisitions, the implementation of new production equipment in a timely, cost-efficient manner, risks that any benefits from such new equipment may be delayed or not fully realized, actions by the Company’s competitors, and the ability of the Company to respond to such actions, the ability of the Company to obtain new customers, the ability of the Company to offset lost revenues, evolving customer requirements, difficulties associated with the roll-out of new products, decisions by customers to cancel or defer orders for the Company’s products that previously had been accepted, the costs of compliance with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley, and general economic and industry conditions and other factors.  In addition to the foregoing, the Company’s actual future results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors set forth elsewhere in this report and changes in general economic conditions, interest rates and the assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements.  All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the risk factors and other disclaimers described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in particular its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

UFP Technologies is a producer of innovative custom-engineered components, products, and specialty packaging. The Company serves a myriad of markets, but specifically targets opportunities in the medical, automotive, aerospace & defense, electronics, consumer, and industrial markets.

In the first six months of 2012, the Company experienced organic sales growth of 1%, reflecting increased demand from most end-use markets. The increase in sales from these markets was substantially offset by a decrease in sales to the automotive market primarily due to the phase-out of a significant portion of the Company’s large door panel program in the Southeast.  Excluding the door panel program sales from our results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, our revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, grew 7.6%.

In prior periods the Company had a 26.32% ownership interest in a realty limited partnership, United Development Company Limited (“UDT”).  The Company had consolidated the financial statements of UDT for prior periods because it determined that UDT was a VIE.  On February 29, 2012, the Company purchased the manufacturing building that it leased from UDT for $1,350,000, which management believes approximates fair market value.  Since this transaction took place among commonly controlled companies, the building was recorded by the Company at UDT’s carrying value.  Thus, in effect, the Company has acquired the remaining 73.68% ownership interest in UDT, eliminating the VIE.  Subsequently, UDT was dissolved and its assets were distributed.  The non-controlling interests’ portion of the excess of the amount paid for the building over UDT’s carrying value, totaling $535,481, has been recorded in stockholders’ equity as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.  The transaction did not impact the consolidated results of operations.

Due to a redesigned model vehicle, a substantial portion of a large automotive door panel program ended on June 30, 2011, although the Company is still supplying door panels to the customer for other model vehicles.  Sales of door panels for the discontinued model vehicle were approximately $2.15 million and $4.0 million, respectively, in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011.

The Company’s current strategy includes organic growth and growth through strategic acquisitions.

Sales

Sales for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, increased slightly to $33.7 million from sales of $33.5 million for the same period in 2011.  Sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, increased approximately 1% to $65.6 million from sales of $65 million for the same period in 2011. The slight increase in sales for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to increased sales to the medical industry of approximately $700,000 (Component Products segment) as well as an increase in sales of molded fiber packaging of approximately $570,000 (Packaging segment), mostly offset by a decrease in sales to the automotive industry of approximately $1.25 million.  The increase in sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to increased sales to the medical industry of approximately $1.2 million (Component Products segment) as well as an increase in sales of molded fiber packaging of approximately $1.6 million (Packaging segment), substantially offset by a decrease in sales to the automotive industry of approximately $2.2 million.  The decline in sales to the automotive industry for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, is due to the phaseout of a significant portion of the Company’s large door panel program in the Southeast.  Excluding the door panel program sales from

11

Table of Contents

our results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, our revenues for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, grew 7.4% and 7.6%, respectively.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of sales (“gross margin”) decreased to 28.8% both for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, from 29.9% and 28.9% for the same respective periods in 2011.  The decrease in gross margin for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to a $250,000 tooling sale at zero gross margin and a $220,000 one time in nature inventory reserve created for potentially non-compliant materials (as a percentage of sales, material and direct labor collectively increased by 0.9%).  The slight decline in gross margin for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to higher fixed components of cost of sales (as a percentage of sales, material and labor collectively decreased 0.6% while overhead increased 0.7%), partially offset by an improvement in the mix of business.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased approximately $300,000 or 5.2% to $5.4 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, from $5.7 million for the same period in 2011.  SG&A decreased approximately $500,000 or 4.4% to $10.9 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, from $11.4 million for the same period in 2011.  The decrease in SG&A for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to a decrease in professional fees of approximately $200,000 and $340,000, respectively, due to prior year initiatives.

As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased to 16.0% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, from 17.0% for the same three-month period of 2011.  As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased to 16.6% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, from 17.6% for the same six-month period of 2011.  The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of sales for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to the reduction in general and administrative expenses against relatively similar sales.

Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets

The gain on sale of fixed assets of approximately $834,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, was derived primarily from the sale of real estate in Alabama by UDT.  Of this $834,000 gain, approximately $428,000 relates to non-controlling interests that have been deducted to determine net income attributable to UFP Technologies, Inc.

Other Expenses

The Company had net interest expense of approximately $14,000 and $12,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The Company had net interest expense of approximately $30,000 and $13,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively.  The increase in interest expense for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to lower interest earned on cash.

The Company recorded a tax expense of approximately 36% of income before income tax expense for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, compared to a tax expense of approximately 37% (excluding income attributable to non-controlling interests) for the comparable three- and six-month periods of 2011.  The slight decrease in the effective income tax rate for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to higher than expected deductions for domestic manufacturing incentives.  The non-controlling interest in UDT was not subject to corporate income tax.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company funds its operating expenses, capital requirements, and growth plan through internally generated cash and bank credit facilities.

At June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the Company’s working capital was approximately $48.9 million and $48.6 million, respectively.  The slight increase in working capital for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, is primarily due to an increase in receivables, net of approximately $775,000, partially offset by a decrease in cash of approximately $600,000 due largely to the purchase of the Florida real estate from UDT for $1,350,000 and the subsequent distribution of UDT’s assets, and the purchase of new molded fiber equipment.

12

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, was approximately $5.7 million primarily due to net income from consolidated operations of approximately $5.1 million and depreciation and amortization of approximately $1.4 million, partially offset by an increase in receivables, net of approximately $775,000 due to strong March sales.

Cash used in investing activities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, was approximately $4.9 million and was primarily the result of additions of manufacturing machinery and equipment and software.  Included in the additions to manufacturing machinery and equipment was approximately $2.6 million in progress payments associated with molded fiber machinery.

Cash used in financing activities was approximately $1.4 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to cash used in financing activities of approximately $1.5 million in the comparable period of 2011.  The cash used in financing activities for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, is due primarily to a distribution to the non-controlling interests of UDT of approximately $1.0 million due to the Company’s purchase of the Florida real estate from UDT and subsequent dissolution of UDT.

On January 29, 2009, the Company amended and extended its credit facility with Bank of America, NA.  The facility comprises: (i) a revolving credit facility of $17 million; (ii) a term loan of $2.1 million with a seven-year straight line amortization; (iii) a term loan of $1.8 million with a 20-year straight line amortization; and (iv) a term loan of $4.0 million with a 20-year straight line amortization.  Extensions of credit under the revolving credit facility are based in part upon accounts receivable and inventory levels.  Therefore, the entire $17 million may not be available to the Company.  At June 30, 2012, the Company had availability of approximately $16.9 million, based upon collateral levels as of that date.  The credit facility calls for interest of LIBOR plus a margin that ranges from 1.0% to 1.5% or, at the option of the Company, the bank’s prime rate less a margin that ranges from 0.25% to zero.  In both cases the applicable margin is dependent upon Company performance.  The loans are collateralized by a first priority lien on all of the Company’s assets, including its real estate located in Georgetown, Massachusetts, and in Grand Rapids, Michigan.  Under the credit facility, the Company is subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage financial covenant with which it was in compliance at June 30, 2012.  The Company’s $17 million revolving credit facility matures November 30, 2013; the term loans are all due on January 29, 2016.  The interest rate on these facilities was approximately 1.24% at June 30, 2012.

In 2012 the Company plans on adding capacity to enhance operating efficiencies in its manufacturing plants, including implementing its next generation molded fiber production line.  The Company may consider additional acquisitions of companies, technologies, or products in 2012 that are complementary to its business.  The Company believes that its existing resources, including its revolving credit facility, together with cash generated from operations and funds expected to be available to it through any necessary equipment financing and additional bank borrowings, will be sufficient to fund its cash flow requirements, including capital asset acquisitions, through the next twelve months.

Commitments, Contractual Obligations, and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table summarizes the Company’s commitments, contractual obligations, and off balance sheet arrangements at June 30, 2012, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in future periods:

13

Table of Contents

The Company requires cash to pay its operating expenses, purchase capital equipment, and to service the obligations listed above.  The Company’s principal sources of funds are its operations and its revolving credit facility.  Although the Company generated cash from operations during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, it cannot guarantee that its operations will generate cash in future periods.

The Company had no off balance sheet arrangements during the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, other than operating leases.

ITEM 3:                                     QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following discussion of the Company’s market risk includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties.  Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.  Market risk represents the risk of changes in value of a financial instrument caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices.  At June 30, 2012, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents consisted of bank accounts in U.S. dollars, and their valuation would not be affected by market risk.  The Company has several debt instruments where interest is based upon either the prime rate or LIBOR and, therefore, future operations could be affected by interest rate changes.  However, the Company believes that the market risk of the debt is minimal.

ITEM 4:                                     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)).  Based upon that evaluation, they concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II:                                  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A:                            RISK FACTORS

Information regarding risk factors appears in Part I — Item 2 of this Form 10-Q in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under “Forward-Looking Statements” and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, in Part I — Item 1A under “Risk Factors.”  There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 6:                                     EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included herein:

15

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

UFP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

16