PROXY STATEMENT
OF
UNITED STATES ANTIMONY CORPORATION
47 Cox Gulch, P.O. Box 643
Thompson Falls, Montana 59873
(406) 827-3523
2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
DECEMBER 13, 2014
The Board of Directors of United States Antimony Corporation (USAC or the Company) is using this Proxy Statement to solicit proxies from our shareholders for use at the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. We are first mailing this Proxy Statement and the form of proxy to our shareholders on or about October 20, 2014.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING
Time and Place of the Annual Meeting
Our annual meeting will be held as follows:
Date: Saturday, December 13, 2014
Time: 9:00 a.m., local time
Place: Ramada Inn at the airport, 8909 Airport Drive, Spokane, Washington
Matters to Be Considered at the Annual Meeting
At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:
|
|
Proposal 1.
|
To elect five directors to each serve for a one-year term.
|
|
|
Proposal 2.
|
To ratify the selection of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. as our independent auditor for 2014.
|
We also will transact any other business that may properly come before the annual meeting. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other business to be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement.
Who is Entitled to Vote?
We have fixed the close of business on October 20, 2014 as the Record Date for shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at our annual meeting. Only holders of record of USAC’s common stock and preferred stock on that date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. You are entitled to one vote for each share of USAC common stock and each share of preferred stock you own. On the Record Date, the following shares were outstanding and entitled to vote at the annual meeting: (1) 65,933,564 shares of common stock, (2) 177,904 shares of Series C preferred stock, and (3) 1,751, 005 shares of Series D preferred stock. The Company’s Series B preferred stock does not have voting rights.
How Do I Vote at the Annual Meeting?
You have several voting options. You may vote by:
| |
● |
Completing your proxy card over the internet at the following website: http://www.columbiastock.com/voting4; |
| |
|
|
| |
● |
Faxing your proxy card to Columbia Stock Transfer at 855-644-3544, Attention Michelle White; |
| |
|
|
| |
● |
Emailing your proxy card to Columbia Stock Transfer at michelle@columbiastock.com; |
| |
|
|
| |
● |
Downloading or requesting a proxy card (as detailed below), signing your proxy and mailing it to the attention of Alicia Hill, Secretary, at P.O. Box 643, Thompson Falls, Montana 59873; |
| |
|
|
| |
● |
Signing and faxing your proxy card to our Secretary for proxy voting at the number provided on the proxy card; or |
| |
|
|
| |
● |
Attending the annual meeting and voting in person. |
Proxies are solicited to provide all shareholders of record on the Record Date an opportunity to vote on matters scheduled for the annual meeting and described in these materials. You are a shareholder of record if your shares of USAC common stock and/or preferred stock are held in your name. If you are a beneficial owner of USAC common stock or preferred stock held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), please see the instructions in the following question.
Shares of USAC common stock and preferred stock can only be voted if the shareholder is present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. To ensure your representation at the annual meeting, we recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. You can always change your vote at the meeting if you are a shareholder of record.
Shares of USAC common stock and preferred stock represented by properly executed proxies will be voted by the individuals named on the proxy card in accordance with the shareholder’s instructions. Where properly executed proxies are returned to us with no specific instruction as how to vote at the annual meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares "FOR" the election of each of our director nominees, and "FOR" ratification of the selection of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. as our independent auditor for 2014. If any other matters are properly presented at the annual meeting for action, the persons named in the enclosed proxy and acting thereunder will have the discretion to vote on these matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently expect that any other matters will be properly presented for action at the annual meeting.
You may receive more than one proxy card depending on how your shares are held. For example, you may hold some of your shares individually, some jointly with your spouse and some in trust for your children. In this case, you will receive three separate proxy cards to vote.
What if My Shares Are Held in Street Name?
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” by a broker, your broker, as the record holder of the shares, is required to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your broker, your broker may nevertheless vote the shares with respect to discretionary items, but will not be permitted to vote your shares with respect to non-discretionary items, pursuant to current industry practice. In the case of non-discretionary items, the shares not voted will be treated as “broker non-votes.”
If your shares are held in street name, you will need proof of ownership to be admitted to the annual meeting. A recent brokerage statement or letter from the record holder of your shares are examples of proof of ownership. If you want to vote your shares of common stock or preferred stock held in street name in person at the annual meeting, you will have to get a written proxy in your name from the broker, bank or other nominee who holds your shares.
How Many Shares Must Be Present to Hold the Meeting?
A quorum must be present at the meeting for any business to be conducted. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of at least a majority of the shares of USAC common stock and preferred stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting as of the record date will constitute a quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.
What if a Quorum Is Not Present at the Meeting?
If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the meeting, a majority of the shareholders present or represented by proxy may adjourn the meeting until a quorum is present. The time and place of the adjourned meeting will be announced at the time the adjournment is taken, and no other notice will be given unless the meeting is adjourned for 120 days or more. An adjournment will have no effect on the business that may be conducted at the meeting.
Vote Required to Approve Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting by holders of a plurality of outstanding shares entitled to vote present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation, shareholders are permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of directors. Under cumulative voting, each holder of voting stock has a number of votes that is equal to the number of shares of voting stock he or she owns multiplied by the number of directors to be elected. The holder may cast all of those votes for one nominee or distribute them among all or less than all of the nominees as the shareholder sees fit. Since five directors are to be elected at the meeting, the total votes which may be cast in the election of directors is calculated as follows:
Number of shares of voting stock owned by you [ ] x 5 (number of directors to be elected) = total votes. Shareholders may allocate their votes among the five nominees described below. Votes may be cast for or withheld from each nominee.
Vote Required to Approve Proposal 2: Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Auditor
Ratification of the selection of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
May I Revoke My Proxy?
You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by:
● submitting a new proxy with a later date;
● notifying the Secretary of USAC in writing before the annual meeting that you have revoked your proxy; or
● voting in person at the annual meeting.
If you plan to attend the annual meeting and wish to vote in person, we will give you a ballot at the annual meeting. However, if your shares are held in “street name,” you must bring a validly executed proxy from the nominee indicating that you have the right to vote your shares.
How can I obtain a copy of the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K?
The Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, including financial statements, is available on the internet with this Proxy Statement at http://www.usantimony.com. The Form is also available through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
At the written request of any shareholder who owns shares on the Record Date, the Company will provide to such shareholder, without charge, a paper copy of the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements, but not including exhibits.
If requested the Company will provide copies of the exhibits for a reasonable fee.
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
What is the current compensation of the Board?
Our Board of Directors currently consists of five members.
Is the Board divided into classes? How long is the term?
No, the Board is not divided into classes. All directors serve one-year terms until their successors are elected and qualified at the next annual meeting.
Who is standing for election this year?
The Board of Directors has nominated the following five current Board Members for election at the 2014 annual meeting, to hold office until the 2015 annual meeting:
What if a nominee is unable or unwilling to serve?
All of our nominees currently serve as USAC directors. Each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders will vote your shares for the substitute nominee, unless you have withheld authority. At this time, we are not aware of any reason why a nominee might be unable to serve if elected.
How are nominees elected?
Directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the annual meeting by holders of a plurality of outstanding shares entitled to vote present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting. Pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation, shareholders are permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of directors.
Board Recommendation
The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the five nominees. All proxies executed and returned without an indication of how shares should be voted will be voted FOR the election of all nominees.
INFORMATION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to current directors. The term for each director expires at our next annual meeting or until his or her successor is appointed and qualified. The ages of the directors are shown as of December 31, 2013.
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Affiliation
|
|
Expiration of Term
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Lawrence
|
|
75
|
|
Chairman, President, and Treasurer; Director
|
|
Annual meeting
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary D. Babbitt
|
|
68
|
|
Director
|
|
Annual meeting
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hartmut W. Baitis
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
|
Annual meeting
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell C. Lawrence
|
|
45
|
|
Director
|
|
Annual meeting
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Whitney H. Ferer |
|
55 |
|
Director |
|
Annual meeting |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bernard J. Guarnera* |
|
70 |
|
Director |
|
Annual meeting* |
*Mr. Guarnera resigned from the Board of Directors effective January 24, 2014.
Set forth below is the present principal occupation and other business experience during the last five years of each five nominees for election (excluding Mr. Guarnera who is not standing for election).
John C. Lawrence. Mr. Lawrence has been the president and a director since the Company’s inception. Mr. Lawrence was the president and a director of AGAU Mines, Inc., our corporate predecessor, since the inception of AGAU Mines, Inc. in 1968. He is a member of the Society of Mining Engineers and a recipient of the Uuno Sahinen Silver Medallion Award presented by Butte Tech, University of Montana. He holds a BA degree from Hamilton with course work at the University of Wyoming, an MA degree from the University of Wyoming and has completed all course work and thesis at the University of Utah for a PhD degree. Mr. Lawrence has an extensive background in mining, milling, smelting, chemical processing and oil and gas.
Gary D. Babbitt. Mr. Babbitt, who joined the Board in 1998, has been involved in the formation of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries and acquisition of mining concessions and smelter operations in Mexico, and other business relationships of the Company domestically and internationally. He currently serves as secretary/director of USAC’s Mexican Subsidiaries. Prior to becoming a USAC director, he represented mining companies in a variety of transactions and cases for more than 30 years in the Western United States, with an emphasis in mining law and CERCLA. Mr. Babbitt has a B.A. from the Albertson College of Idaho, and earned his J.D. from the University of Chicago.
Hartmut W. Baitis. Mr. Baitis, who joined the Board in 2011, has more than 35 years of experience as an exploration geologist in the U.S., Canada, Central America and Mexico. Since 1995, he has been a consultant to numerous mining companies, and preparing advanced-stage precious metal, base metal and industrial metal evaluations. Mr. Baitis is involved in ownership of several gold and base metal properties and two producing mines. He has a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Geology from the University of Oregon.
Russell C. Lawrence. Mr. Lawrence, who joined the Board in 2007, has experience in the lines of applied physics, mining, refining, excavation, electricity, electronics, and building contracting. He graduated from the University of Idaho with a degree in physics in 1994 and worked for the Physics Department at the University of Idaho for a period of 10 years. He has also worked as a building contractor and for USAC at the smelter and laboratory at Thompson Falls, for USAMSA in the construction and operation of the USAMSA smelter in Mexico, and for Antimonio de Mexico, S. A. de C. V. at the San Miguel Mine and the Cadereyta mill site in Mexico. He also serves as vice president/director of USAC’s Mexican Subsidiaries. Mr. Lawrence is the son of John C. Lawrence, the Company’s Chairman and President.
Meetings of the Board and Board Member Attendance at Annual Meeting
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Board of Directors held four (4) meetings. Each incumbent director, other than Bernard Guarnera, attended all of the meetings of the Board and committees on which such person served during this period.
Board members are not required to attend the annual meeting.
Communications to the Board
Shareholders who are interested in communicating directly with members of the Board, or the Board as a group, may do so by writing directly to the individual Board member c/o Corporate Secretary, Alicia Hill, at United States Antimony Corporation, P.O. Box 643, Thompson Falls, Montana 59873. Our Secretary will forward communications directly to the appropriate Board member. If the correspondence is not addressed to the particular member, the communication will be forwarded to a Board member to bring to the attention of the Board. Our Secretary will review all communications before forwarding them to the appropriate Board member.
Committees and Committee Charters
The Board of Directors has a standing Executive Committee, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. The Audit Committee was established in December 2011, and the Compensation and the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committees were established in 2012.
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee consists of two members, John C. Lawrence and Gary D. Babbitt. During 2013, the Executive Committee met two (2) times.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Experts
We have a standing Audit Committee and audit committee charter, which complies with Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the requirements of the NYSE MKT. Our Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Our Audit Committee is composed of three (3) directors each of whom, in the opinion of the Board, are independent (in accordance with Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the requirements of Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide) and financially literate (pursuant to the requirements of Section 803B of the NYSE MKT Company Guide): Gary D. Babbitt (Chairman), Hartmut W. Baitis and Whitney H. Ferer. Mr. Baitis satisfies the requirement of a “financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K and meets the requirements for financial sophistication under the requirements of Section 803B of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.
Our Audit Committee meets with our management and our external auditors to review matters affecting financial reporting, the system of internal accounting and financial controls and procedures and the audit procedures and audit plans. Our Audit Committee reviews our significant financial risks, is involved in the appointment of senior financial executives and annually reviews our insurance coverage and any off-balance sheet transactions.
Our Audit Committee monitors our audit and the preparation of financial statements and all financial disclosure contained in our SEC filings. Our Audit Committee appoints our external auditors, monitors their qualifications and independence and determines the appropriate level of their remuneration. The external auditors report directly to the Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee has the authority to terminate our external auditors’ engagement and approve in advance any services to be provided by the external auditors that are not related to the audit.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Audit Committee met seven (7) times. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available on our website at www.usantimony.com.
Audit Committee Report
Our Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The Committee has three (3) members, each of whom is “independent” as determined under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE MKT. The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board.
The Committee assists the Board by overseeing the (1) integrity of our financial reporting and internal control, (2) independence and performance of our independent auditors, (3) and provides an avenue of communication between management, the independent auditors and the Board.
In the course of providing its oversight responsibilities regarding the 2013 financial statements, the Committee reviewed the 2013 audited financial statements, which appear in the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, with management and our independent auditors. The Committee reviewed accounting principles, practices, and judgments as well as the adequacy and clarity of the notes to the financial statements.
The Committee reviewed the independence and performance of the independent auditors who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and such other matters as required to be communicated by the independent auditors in accordance with Statement of Auditing Standards 61, as superseded by Statement of Auditing Standard 114—the Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance, as modified or supplemented.
The Committee meets with the independent auditors to discuss their audit plans, scope and timing on a regular basis, with or without management present. The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for independent auditor communications with audit committees concerning independence, as may be modified or supplemented.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Committee and the Board have also recommended the selection of DeCoria, Maichel and Teague P.S. as independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal year 2014.
USubmitted by the Audit Committee Members
|
●
|
Gary D. Babbit (Chairman)
|
Compensation Committee
We have a Compensation Committee composed of three (3) directors, all of whom, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, are independent (under Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide): Gary D. Babbitt (Chairman), Hartmut W. Baitis and Whitney H. Ferer.
We have a Compensation Committee charter that complies with the requirements of the NYSE MKT. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for considering and authorizing terms of employment and compensation of executive officers and providing advice on compensation structures in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Our Chief Executive Officer may not be present during the voting determination or deliberations of his or her compensation; however, our Compensation Committee does consult with our Chief Executive Officer in determining and recommending the compensation of directors and other executive officers.
In addition, our Compensation Committee reviews both our overall salary objectives and significant modifications made to employee benefit plans, including those applicable to executive officers, and propose awards of stock options, if any. The Compensation Committee has determined that the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees generally, not just executive officers, are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Compensation Committee does not and cannot delegate its authority to determine director and executive officer compensation. Due to budgetary constraints, neither the Company or the Compensation Committee has engaged the services of an external compensation consultant.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Compensation Committee met two (2) times. A copy of the Compensation Committee charter is available on our website at www.usantimony.com.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
We have a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee composed of three (3) directors, all of whom, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, are independent (under Section 803A of the NYSE MKT Company Guide): Gary D. Babbitt (Chairman), Hartmut W. Baitis and Whitney H. Ferer. We have a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter that complies with the requirements of the NYSE MKT.
Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing our approach to corporate governance issues. The Committee evaluates the qualifications of potential candidates for director and recommends to the Board nominees for election at the next annual meeting or any special meeting of shareholders, and any person to be considered to fill a Board vacancy resulting from death, disability, removal, resignation or an increase in Board size. The Committee has adopted a Director Nominating Process and Policy which sets forth the criteria the Board will assess in connection with the consideration of a candidate, including the candidate’s integrity, reputation, judgment, knowledge, independence, experience, accomplishments, commitment and skills, all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that time. A copy of the Director Nominating Process and Policy is available on our website at www.usantimony.com.
We do not have a formal policy regarding diversity in the selection of nominees for directors. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does, however, consider diversity as part of its overall selection strategy. In considering diversity of the Board as a criteria for selecting nominees, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account various factors and perspectives, including differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills and other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to Board heterogeneity, as well as race, gender and national origin. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks persons with leadership experience in a variety of contexts. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that this conceptualization of diversity is the most effective means to implement Board diversity. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will assess the effectiveness of this approach as part of its annual review of its charter.
The Committee will consider recommendations for director nominees made by shareholders and others if these individuals meet the criteria set forth in the Director Nominating Process and Policy. For consideration by the Committee, the nominating shareholder or other person must provide the Corporate Secretary’s Office with information about the nominee, including the detailed background of the suggested candidate that will demonstrate how the individual meets our director nomination criteria. If a candidate proposed by a shareholder meets the criteria, the individual will be considered on the same basis as other candidates. No shareholder or shareholders holding 5% or more of our outstanding stock, either individually or in aggregate, has recommended a nominee for election to the Board.
All of the nominees included on the proxy card accompanying this proxy statement were nominated by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and were recommended by our current Board.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met one (1) time. A copy of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter is available on our website at www.usantimony.com.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board has reviewed our current Board leadership structure in light of the composition of the Board, our size, the nature of our business, the regulatory framework under which we operate, our shareholder base, our peer group and other relevant factors. Considering these factors we have determined not to have a separate Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, and to have John C. Lawrence fill both roles. We have determined that this structure is currently the most appropriate Board leadership structure for us. The Board noted the following factors in reaching its determination:
|
●
|
The Board acts efficiently and effectively under its current structure.
|
|
●
|
A structure of a combined Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board is in the best position to be aware of major issues facing us on a day-to-day and long-term basis, and is in the best position to identify key risks and developments facing us to be brought to the Board’s attention.
|
|
●
|
This structure eliminates the potential for confusion and duplication of efforts, including among employees.
|
|
●
|
Companies within our peer group utilize similar Board structures.
|
We do not have a lead independent director. Given the size of the Board, the Board believes that the presence of three independent directors out of the five directors on the Board, with independent directors sitting on the Board’s committees, is sufficient independent oversight of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The independent directors work well together in the current board structure and the Board does not believe that selecting a lead independent director would add significant benefits to the Board oversight role.
The Board of Director’s Role in Risk Management Oversight
The understanding, identification and management of risk are essential elements for the successful management of the Company. Risk oversight begins with the Board and the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee consists of Mr. Babbitt (Chairman), and Messrs. Baitus and Ferer, each of whom is an independent director.
The Audit Committee reviews and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee also has oversight responsibility with respect to the integrity of our financial reporting process and systems of internal control regarding finance and accounting, as well as its financial statements.
At the management level, an internal audit provides reliable and timely information to the Board and management regarding our effectiveness in identifying and appropriately controlling risks. Annually, management presents to the Audit Committee a report summarizing the review of our methods for identifying and managing risks.
Additionally, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the risks related to succession planning and the independence of the Board. The Compensation Committee reviews the risks related to our various compensation plans.
In the event that a committee is allocated responsibility for examining and analyzing a specific risk, such committee reports on the relevant risk exposure during its regular reports to the entire Board to facilitate proper risk oversight by the entire Board.
Based on a review of the nature of operations, we do not believe that any areas of the Company are incentivized to take excessive risks that would likely have a material adverse effect on our operations.
DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION
We paid directors' fees in the form of 26,000 shares of our common stock per director during 2010. In January of 2012, we issued the directors 149,500 shares, of which 95,835 shares were for services during 2011. The remaining shares were to be part of the directors’ compensation for 2012. Following is a summary of fees, cash payments, stock awards, and other reimbursements to Directors during the year ended December 31, 2013
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Fees Earned or paid in Cash
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Total Fees, Awards, and Other Compensation
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Lawrence, Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Bernard Guarnera, Director
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Gary D. Babbitt, Director
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
61,000
|
|
Russell Lawrence, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Hartmut Baitis, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Whitney Ferer, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning the annual compensation for services to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, paid by the Company to its executive officers.
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock Awards (1)
|
|
|
All Other Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Lawrence, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
141,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
141,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166,000 |
|
| |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
126,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
188,400 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Gustaven, Executive Vice President
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
| |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Lawrence, Vice President for Latin America
|
|
2013
|
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
| |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
147,400 |
|
|
(1)
|
These figures represent the fair values, as of the date of issuance, of the annual director's fees payable in the form of shares of USAC's common stock.
|
| |
Compensation for all executive officers, except for the President/CEO position, is recommended to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors by the President/CEO. The Compensation Committee makes the recommendation for the compensation of the President/CEO. The Compensation Committee has identified a peer group of mining companies to aid in reviewing the President’s compensation recommendations for executives, and for reviewing the compensation of the President/CEO. The full Board approves the compensation amounts recommended by the Compensation Committee. Currently, the compensation of executive management includes only base salary and health insurance. The Company does not have annual performance based salary increases, long term performance based cash incentives, deferred compensation, retirement benefits, or disability benefits. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, the President/CEO received an increase in annual base compensation of $24,000and $15,000, respectively. The Board of Directors determined that this executive officer’s compensation for the prior years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, was substantially less than that of chief executive officers for similar companies, and that a raise was appropriate to compensate him for management of an enterprise with the complexities of United States Antimony Corporation.
|
| |
Two executive officers, the President/CEO and the Vice-President for the Latin American operations, have received restricted stock awards for their services as Board members.
|
Equity Compensation Awards
The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2013, held by our principal executive officer. There were not any other outstanding equity awards or plan based awards to officers or directors as of December 31, 2013.
| |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at
Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
|
|
|
Average Exercise Price
|
|
Option Exercise Dates |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Lawrence
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
None
|
|
(Chairman of the Board Of Directors and Chief Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This discussion and analysis provides you with an understanding of our executive compensation philosophy, plans and practices, and gives you the context for understanding and evaluating the more specific compensation information contained in the tables and related disclosures set forth above.
United States Antimony Corporation (USAC or the Company) is engaged in mining and processing zeolite, antimony and precious metals. We own and operate a zeolite mine and plant near Preston, Idaho and own and operate the Los Juarez antimony mine in the state of Queretaro, Mexico. We also operate a mill in Guanajuato, Mexico and antimony smelters in Coahuila, Mexico and Thompson Falls, Montana. The Company headquarters are in Thompson Falls, Montana. The Company also operates antimony mines atSoyatal and Wadley and has supply agreements with mines at Guadalapana and Guadalupe.
In analyzing executive compensation, the committee recognized the hardship and risk which the CEO, John Lawrence, and the Executive Vice Presidents, John Gustaven and Russell Lawrence, faced and continue to endure in working in Mexico. Employment at the senior management level has been static in 2013 and 2014, both in the Company and all of its subsidiaries.
Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program
Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee (Committee) directs the design of and oversees the compensation programs. The Committee recommends the compensation level for the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and it recommends the compensation levels of the other Company executives. The independent Directors of the Board then consider the recommendations and vote on them. The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations to the Board concerning salary guidelines and reviews compensation matters concerning all other executive officer and director compensation , including salaries, bonuses, stock-based award, and grants, and the terms and conditions of employment contracts. The Compensation Committee also oversees and consults with management on succession plans.
The Compensation Committee meets annually to consider recommendations to the Board. Typically, the CEO of the Company makes recommendations to the Committee concerning individual salary levels and other compensation for the executives based on his knowledge of the work requirements and their effort and success. The CEO does not make any recommendation concerning his salary or compensation. The Compensation Committee, as noted, makes its own recommendation concerning the CEO’s salary or other compensation. The Compensation Committee also reviews the adequacy of and director compensation on an annual basis. The Compensation Committee balances the Company’s compensation levels with the present operational goals and objectives of the Company.
The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Hart Baitis, Whitney Ferer, and Gary Babbitt, Chairman. This is the Second Compensation Committee report. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant in either the preparation or review of this report. The Board of Directors fixed director awards based on the Committee’s market analysis.
Role of Executive Officers
The Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee concerning executive officers total compensation.
The Chief Executive Officer and executive officers make recommendations to the Committee concerning long term plans and goals and short term goals for executive officers and for the CEO.
The executive officers may make recommendations concerning any qualified or non- qualified stock plan which the Company may have. At this time, the Company does not have a qualified or non-qualified stock plan.
The Committee reviews the executive officer recommendations for compensation and exercises its discretion in amending, accepting or modifying the recommendations for compensation.
The Committee did not employ an employment consultant in 2014 due to budget constraints.
Executive Compensation Principles
The following principles assist and guide the Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities as set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter and administration of the continuing executive compensation program:
|
●
|
Compensation should be transparent so that both the Company shareholders and executives understand the executive compensation program.
|
|
●
|
Compensation programs should correspond with the Company’s long-term financial interest as well as the interests of shareholders.
|
|
●
|
Compensation should be flexible and rational in cyclical or volatile commodity markets.
|
|
●
|
Compensation should account for the inherent risks in certain geographical environments.
|
|
●
|
Compensation should be responsive to retaining qualified, high caliber executives and management.
|
Executive Management currently receives only a base salary and health insurance. The Company does not have annual performance based salary plans, or long term performance based cash incentives, deferred compensation, retirement benefits or disability benefits. The CEO, John Lawrence, and Russell Lawrence, the Vice President of Latin American Operations, are Board members and receive compensation in the form of Company common stock for serving on the Board.
Market Position
While the Company has identified a peer group, the Committee recommends not to raise or change Executive Management base salaries in 2014 and the salaries have remained static from the 2013 level, except for a modest increase of the CFO’s compensation from $75,000 to $90,000. The CFO is an hourly employee, and as a result of increased workload in 2014, his compensation increased.
The Board of Directors rescinded the historical annual grant of restricted 26,000 shares of common stock to the directors as of May 13, 2012. The directors’ new compensation was limited in 2013 not to exceed $25,000 in value unless circumstances otherwise permit a different award. The Company does not have percentile projections, incentives, or goals of compensation for any executive or directors of the Company. There is no other compensation to executives or directors other than what is disclosed in this report. As the directors’ stock award for 2013 was not made until the spring of 2014, the Board of Directors will wait until the end of 2014 or early 2015 to determine director compensation for 2014.
Market Assessments
The Committee reviews market compensation levels for the Board of Director and Executive compensation. At the present time the continuing development of the Mexican program requires that changes in base salary of the executives and compensation of directors will be carefully determined and on a case by case basis annually.
Peer Group
The Committee identified the following mining companies for the peer or comparison group for compensation analysis comparisons based on their 2014 market capitalization. These companies are mainly operating mining companies, as exploration companies are not considered to be peers. The following list ranks the peer group companies by the size of their capitalization (e.g., the Company’s capitalization is $95,000,000) and shows that information with available salary levels. The companies’ market symbol is shown in parenthesis.
| |
|
CEO/PRES
|
|
|
COO
|
|
|
EX VP
|
|
|
CFO
|
|
|
TREAS/SEC
|
|
|
1. Mandalay Resources (MND.TO, 382)
|
|
446,000 |
|
|
402,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
321,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
2. Polymet Mining (PLM, 341)
|
|
459,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
292,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
3. Klondex Mines (KDX.TO, 228)
|
|
937,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
4. Great Panther Silver (GPL, 177)
|
|
532,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
311,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
5. Comstock Mining (LODE, 118)
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
6. USAC (UAMY, 95)
|
|
141,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
7. General Moly (GMD, 94)
|
|
431,000 |
|
|
253,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
214,000 |
|
|
8. Alexco (AXU, 78)
|
|
407,000 |
|
|
373,000 |
|
|
234,000 |
|
|
241,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
9. Avino Gold & Silver (ASM, 72)
|
|
279,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
10. Golden Minerals (AUMD, 51)
|
|
479,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
243,000 |
|
|
263,000 |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
11. Revett Mining (RVM, 42)
|
|
308,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
12. Northern Vertex (NEE.v, 21)
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
NA
|
|
The salary numbers are from public documents available in July, 2014.
Personal Benefits for Executives
The Company does not have:
|
●
|
Change in control agreements;
|
|
●
|
Supplemental compensation policies;
|
|
●
|
Employment contracts; or
|
|
●
|
Separation or Severance Agreements.
|
Executive Compensation for 2014
The following compensation table is for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, for the CEO, Vice Presidents, CFO, and Secretary/Controller:
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary (2)
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock Awards (1) (3)
|
|
All Other Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Lawrence, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
141,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
-0- |
|
|
|
$ |
141,000 |
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
141,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
166,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
141,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
166,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Gustaven, Executive Vice President
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Lawrence, Vice President for Latin America
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
-0- |
|
|
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
105,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Keane, Vice President of Marketing
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Parks, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alicia Hill, Secretary and Controller
|
|
2014
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
| |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
| |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
1.
|
In August of 2012 the Board of Directors changed the maximum award of stock to the Directors to be not more than $25,000 per director in value unless circumstances otherwise permitted a different amount. Thus the stock awards for 2012 and 2013 are authorized for Directors and shall be issued at a subsequent date with a value not to exceed $25,000 as authorized or as circumstances may merit. All stock awards for John Lawrence and Russell Lawrence for 2012 through 2014 were included in this compensation report as part of executive salary to follow industry custom and to make the comparisons with the peer group more consistent, even though the stock was not delivered at that time.
|
|
2.
|
The CFO is paid on an hourly rate and the salary increase for the CFO is the result of additional hours worked in 2014. The other officers did not receive any compensation increases.
|
|
3.
|
The Directors received their 2013 stock in the first quarter of 2014. There is no decision on the award of the 2014 shares.
|
Review of Executive Salaries with Peer Group for 2014 Salaries
The compensation of Company executives ranked 12th out of the 12 member peer group. The Company, however, ranked 6th out of the 12 member peer group in terms of capitalization. In terms of the number of employees reported by the peer group, the Company ranked 3rd .
Expatriate Compensation
The Company pays for lodging, food, and transportation both domestically and internationally as needed and required in the US and Mexico. Security issues influence transportation in Mexico.
Compensation of Independent Directors
The following table sets for the information concerning the compensation of the Company Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The table lists all compensation received by the independent directors. The stock received by executives who were also directors, John Lawrence and Russell Lawrence, was counted under executive compensation.
| Director Compensation for 2014 (2) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Fees Earned or Paid |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
All other Compensation |
|
|
Total ($) |
|
| Gary Babbitt (1) |
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
61,000 |
|
| Hart Baitis |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
25.000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
| Whitney Ferer |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
1.
|
Gary Babbitt presently serves as Chairman of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance & Nomination Committees. He also serves on the Corporate Executive Committee and is a board member and Secretary of USAMSA, the Company’s wholly owned Mexican subsidiary. Hart Baitis and Whitney Ferer are members of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance & Nomination Committees.
|
|
2.
|
The stock awards for the directors represent awards authorized in 2013 but were not made until 2014. The 2014 stock awards will be made later in 2014 or in early 2015.
|
The directors may receive an award of stock equivalent in value of $25,000 for service in 2014 and succeeding years unless circumstances permit a different level of compensation.
The National Association of Corporate Directors published its 2011-2013 Director Compensation Report. For micro capitalized companies the average corporate director compensation increased from $96,000 in 2011 to $97,308 in 2012. The USAC directors’ compensation is significantly less than the average for micro companies by over $72,000 under this study.
The “2011 BDO 600 Survey of Board Directors Pay” studied the pay of 600 NYSE Companies. In the study there were non-financial companies with revenues between $25 Million and $1 billion. This was a mid- market survey of companies. The BDO survey found that, (1) stock awards were favored over stock options; and, (2) the average stock option grant for all companies was about $20,000. The average stock grant was $25,000 for the smaller companies, i.e., $25M to 325M (which is within the capitalization range of the peer group of this report). The smaller companies had an annual total director average compensation of all sources totaling $90,575. This study also shows the position of USAC director compensation well below the average.
The Company does not have an executive or director compensation program. The Company has a measured compensation approach consistent with its growth. In short, compensation will be reviewed annually.
Committee Recommendations for 2014 Compensation of Officers and Independent Directors
The Committee recommends that the Executive Pay for 2014 for John Lawrence, CEO, John Gustaven and Russell Lawrence, Executive VPs remain the same as noted above. The Committee recommends that Chairmanship fees for the Audit, Compensation, and Governance/ Nomination Committees be accepted as set forth in this report and that Director’s fees shall be $25,000 or the equivalent amount in USAC common stock, restricted under Rule 144, for 2014 or as circumstances may otherwise permit and may be authorized in late 2014 or early 2015.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the foregoing compensation discussion and analysis. Based upon our independent review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the compensation discussion and analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Gary D. Babbitt, Chairman
Hartmut W. Baitis
Whitney H. Ferer
Code of Business and Ethical Conduct
We have adopted a corporate Code of Business and Ethical Conduct administered by our President/CEO, John C. Lawrence. We believe our Code of Business and Ethical Conduct is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, to provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports, to comply with applicable laws, to ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations, and to provide accountability for adherence to the code. Our Code of Business and Ethical Conduct provides written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
|
●
|
Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
|
|
●
|
Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with, or submitted to, the Commission and in other public communications made by an issuer;
|
|
●
|
Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
|
|
●
|
The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and
|
|
●
|
Accountability for adherence to the code.
|
Our Code of Business and Ethical Conduct is available on our web site at www.usantimony.com. A copy of the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct will be provided to any person without charge upon written request to us at our executive offices: United States Antimony Corporation, P.O. Box 643, Thompson Falls, Montana 59873. We intend to disclose any waiver from a provision of our code of ethics that applies to any of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of our code of ethics on our website. No waivers were granted from the requirements of our Code of Business and Ethical Conduct during the year ended December 31, 2013, or during the subsequent period from January 1, 2014, through the date of this proxy statement.
Compensation Interlocks and Insider Participation
There were no compensation committee or board interlocks among the members of our Board.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our officers, directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% shareholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they have filed.
Based solely on our review of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us, Mr. John Lawrence, Mr. Babbitt, Mr. Baitus, Mr. Ferer, Mr. Guanera and Mr. Russell Lawrence did not file timely Forms 3, 4 or Form 5 reports during 2013, 2012 or 2011.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Described below are transactions during the last three years to which we are a party and in which any director, executive officer or beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of any class of our voting securities or relatives of our directors, executive officers or five percent (5%) beneficial owners has a direct or indirect material interest. See also transactions described in notes 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 19 to our Financial Statements as of December 31, 2013.
We reimbursed John C. Lawrence, a director and Chief Executive Officer, for operational and maintenance expenses incurred in connection with our use of equipment owned by Mr. Lawrence, including welding trucks, backhoes, and an aircraft. Reimbursements for 2013, 2012 and 2011, totaled $65,502, $74,490 and $86,508, respectively.
During 2013, we awarded, but did not issue, common stock with a value at December 31, 2013 of $150,000 to our Board of Directors as compensation for their services as directors. In connection with the issuances, we recorded $150,000 in director compensation expense. At a closing price of $1.97 per share on December 31, 2013, the directors will be issued 76,142 shares in the aggregate.
During the year ended 2012, we issued 100,000 shares to Herbert Denton for services provided related to the private issuance of stock in January and June of 2012. The value of the shares issued to Mr. Denton was treated as a cost of issuance and did not affect net income. In January of 2012, 2e also issued 165,827 shares to directors for services, with a value at time of issuance of $451,232. Of this amount, $211,818 was treated as an expense for 2012, $230,004 was expensed in 2011, and $9,410 was expensed in 2013.
During 2011, we awarded 95,835 shares of our common stock to our Board of Directors as compensation for their services as directors. In connection with the issuances, the Company recorded $230,004 in director compensation expense. The shares were issued in January of 2012.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 17, 2014, by (i) each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our Series B, C, and D preferred stock or common stock; (ii) each of our executive officers and directors; and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise stated, each person's address is c/o United States Antimony Corporation, P.O. Box 643, 47 Cox Gulch, Thompson Falls, Montana 59873.
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owners (1)
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Percent of Class (1)
|
|
|
Percent of all Voting Stock
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Cardinal Capital Management LLC
|
|
|
|
4,008,694 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
6.20 |
% |
| |
|
Four Greenwich Office Park |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Greenwich CT 06831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Reed Family Limited Partnership
|
|
|
|
4,018,335 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
% |
|
|
6.40 |
% |
| |
|
328 Adams Street Milton, MA 02186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
The Dugan Family
|
|
|
|
6,362,927 |
(3) |
|
|
10.70 |
% |
|
|
10.40 |
% |
| |
|
c/o A.W.Dugan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1415 Louisana Street, Suite 3100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Houston, TX 77002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Preferred
|
|
Excel Mineral Company
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
(5) |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
| |
|
P.O. Box 3800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Santa Barbara, CA 93130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred
|
|
Richard A. Woods
|
|
|
|
48,305 |
(4) |
|
|
27.10 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
59 Penn Circle West |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Penn Plaza Apts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Pittsburgh, PA 15206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred
|
|
Dr. Warren A. Evans
|
|
|
|
32,203 |
(4) |
|
|
18.10 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
69 Ponfret Landing Road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Brooklyn, CT 06234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred
|
|
Edward Robinson
|
|
|
|
32,203 |
(4) |
|
|
18.10 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
1007 Spruce Street, 1st floor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Philadelphia, PA 19107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred
|
|
All Series C Preferred Shareholders as a Group
|
|
|
|
177,904 |
(4) |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
John C. Lawrence
|
|
|
|
4,128,346 |
(2) |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
6.30 |
% |
| |
|
Russell Lawrence
|
|
|
|
165,693 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Hart Baitis
|
|
|
|
20,526 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Gary Babbitt
|
|
|
|
134,167 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Bernard Guarnera
|
|
|
|
87,725 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Whitney Ferer
|
|
|
|
58,026 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Mathew Keane
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Daniel Parks
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
|
|
4,644,783 |
|
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
7.10 |
% |
|
Series D Preferred
|
|
John C. Lawrence
|
|
|
|
1,590,672 |
(4) |
|
|
90.80 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
| |
|
Leo Jackson
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
Gary Babbitt
|
|
|
|
58,333 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred
|
|
All Series D Preferred Shareholders as a Group
|
|
|
|
1,751,005 |
(4) |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
Common Stock and
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
|
|
4,644,783 |
(2) |
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
7.10 |
% |
| Preferred Stock w/voting rights |
|
All preferred Shareholders that are officers or directors
|
|
|
|
1,751,005 |
(4) |
|
|
90.80 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
Common and Preferred Voting Stock
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
|
|
6,395,798 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
% |
|
|
9.80 |
% |
|
(1)
|
Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of March 17, 2014, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding options or warrants but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Percentages are based on a total of 61,896,726 shares of common stock, 750,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 177,904 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, and 1,751,005 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding on March 17, 2014. Total voting stock of 63,825,635 shares is a total of all the common stock issued, and all of the Series C and Series D Preferred Stock.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 3,801,653 shares of common stock and 250,000 stock purchase warrants. Excludes 183,324 shares owned by Mr. Lawrence's sister, as to which Mr. Lawrence disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes shares owned by the estate of Al W. Dugan and shares owned by companies owned and controlled by the estate of Al W. Dugan. Excludes 183,333 shares owned by Lydia Dugan as to which the estate of Mr. Dugan disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
|
(4)
|
The outstanding Series C and Series D preferred shares carry voting rights equal to the same number of shares of common stock.
|
|
(5)
|
The outstanding Series B preferred shares carry voting rights only if the Company is in default in the payment of declared dividends. The Board of Directors has not declared any dividends as due and payable for the Series B preferred stock.
|
PROPOSAL 2 – RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
What am I voting on?
The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee have selected DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. as our independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2014 and that selection is being submitted to shareholders for ratification. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. to our shareholder for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the selection is not ratified, the Board will consider whether it is appropriate to select another registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Board in its discretion may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of USAC and our shareholders. DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. served as our independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. as our independent auditor for 2014.
Accountant Fees and Services
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Company by DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
| |
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
161,631 |
|
|
$ |
172,991 |
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
$ |
16,578 |
|
|
$ |
4,082 |
|
| Other Fees |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
178,209 |
|
|
$ |
177,073 |
|
Audit Fees
Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements and review of interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by the principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Tax Fees
Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
Audit-Related Fees
There were no other fees billed by DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. during the last three fiscal years for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's financial statements and not reported under "Audit Fees" above.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors determined that all of the services performed by DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. in fiscal year 2013 were not incompatible with DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. maintaining its independence.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals of shareholders intended to be presented at our annual meeting to be held in 2014 must be received by us no later than July 15, 2014 to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials and form of proxy relating to that meeting. Any such proposals shall be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted under the Securities Exchange Act.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John C. Lawrence
Chairman and President
Thompson Falls, Montana
October 13, 2014
REVOCABLE PROXY
UNITED STATES ANTIMONY CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
DECEMBER 13, 2014
The undersigned hereby appoints John C. Lawrence and Gary D. Babbitt, and each of them, with full powers of substitution to act as attorneys and proxies for the undersigned, to vote all shares of common stock of United States Antimony Corporation (“USAC”) which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the annual meeting of shareholders, to be held at the Ramada Inn at the airport, 8909 Airport Drive, on Saturday, December 13, 2014, at 9:00 a.m., local time, and at any and all adjournments thereof, as indicated.
| |
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
|
VOTE
WITHHELD
|
|
| 1. |
|
The election as director of the nominees listed below
|
|
o |
|
|
o |
|
| |
|
(except as marked to the contrary below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
John C. Lawrence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Gary D. Babbitt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Harmut W. Baitis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Russell C. Lawrence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Whitney H. Ferer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
| 2. |
|
The ratification of the selection of De Coria, Miachel & Teague, P.S. as the independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2014.
|
|
o |
|
|
o |
|
|
o |
|
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned stockholder. If no specification is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of the named nominees as directors and FOR Proposal 2, and at the discretion of the proxy on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting
If any other business is presented at the annual meeting, the proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the directors’ recommendations. At the present time, the Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented at the annual meeting. This proxy card also confers discretionary authority on the Board of Directors to vote with respect to the election of any person as director where the nominees are unable to serve or for good cause will not serve and on matters incident to the conduct of the annual meeting.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Should the undersigned be present and elect to vote at the annual meeting or at any adjournment thereof and after notification to the Secretary of USAC at the annual meeting of the shareholder’s decision to terminate this proxy, then the power of said attorneys and proxies shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt from USAC prior to the execution of this proxy of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement dated October 13, 2014.
Dated: , 2014
|
|
|
|
|
PRINT NAME OF SHAREHOLDER
|
|
PRINT NAME OF SHAREHOLDER
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER
|
|
SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER
|
Please sign exactly as your name appears on the enclosed card. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give your full title. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE.