10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2011
Commission File Number 1-34073
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
31-0724920 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287
Registrants telephone number (614) 480-8300
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
There were 863,398,578 shares of Registrants common stock ($0.01 par value) outstanding on March
31, 2011.
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED
INDEX
2
Glossary of Acronyms and Terms
The following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common acronyms and terms used
throughout the document:
|
|
|
2010 Form 10-K
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 |
ABL
|
|
Asset Based Lending |
ACL
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses |
AFCRE
|
|
Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate |
ALCO
|
|
Asset-Liability Management Committee |
ALLL
|
|
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses |
ARM
|
|
Adjustable Rate Mortgage |
ARRA
|
|
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 |
ASC
|
|
Accounting Standards Codification |
ATM
|
|
Automated Teller Machine |
AULC
|
|
Allowance for Unfunded Loan Commitments |
AVM
|
|
Automated Valuation Methodology |
C&I
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
CDARS
|
|
Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service |
CDO
|
|
Collateralized Debt Obligations |
CFPB
|
|
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection |
CMO
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
CPP
|
|
Capital Purchase Program |
CRE
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
DDA
|
|
Demand Deposit Account |
DIF
|
|
Deposit Insurance Fund |
Dodd-Frank Act
|
|
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act |
EESA
|
|
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 |
EPS
|
|
Earnings Per Share |
ERISA
|
|
Employee Retirement Income Security Act |
EVE
|
|
Economic Value of Equity |
Fannie Mae
|
|
(see FNMA) |
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FDIC
|
|
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
FDICIA
|
|
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 |
FFIEC
|
|
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council |
FHA
|
|
Federal Housing Administration |
FHFA
|
|
Federal Housing Finance Agency |
FHLB
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank |
FHLMC
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
FICA
|
|
Federal Insurance Contributions Act |
FICO
|
|
Fair Isaac Corporation |
FNMA
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association |
Franklin
|
|
Franklin Credit Management Corporation |
Freddie Mac
|
|
(see FHLMC) |
FSP
|
|
Financial Stability Plan |
FTE
|
|
Fully-Taxable Equivalent |
FTP
|
|
Funds Transfer Pricing |
3
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America |
GSE
|
|
Government Sponsored Enterprise |
HASP
|
|
Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan |
HCER Act
|
|
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 |
IPO
|
|
Initial Public Offering |
IRS
|
|
Internal Revenue Service |
LIBOR
|
|
London Interbank Offered Rate |
LTV
|
|
Loan to Value |
MD&A
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
MRC
|
|
Market Risk Committee |
MSR
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights |
NALs
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans |
NAV
|
|
Net Asset Value |
NCO
|
|
Net Charge-off |
NPAs
|
|
Nonperforming Assets |
NSF / OD
|
|
Nonsufficient Funds and Overdraft |
OCC
|
|
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency |
OCI
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
OCR
|
|
Optimal Customer Relationship |
OLEM
|
|
Other Loans Especially Mentioned |
OREO
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned |
OTTI
|
|
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment |
Plan
|
|
Huntington Bancshares Retirement Plan |
Reg E
|
|
Regulation E, of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act |
REIT
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trust |
SAD
|
|
Special Assets Division |
SBA
|
|
Small Business Administration |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
SERP
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
Sky Financial
|
|
Sky Financial Group, Inc. |
SRIP
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Income Plan |
Sky Trust
|
|
Sky Bank and Sky Trust, National Association |
TAGP
|
|
Transaction Account Guarantee Program |
TARP
|
|
Troubled Asset Relief Program |
TARP Capital
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock |
TCE
|
|
Tangible Common Equity |
TDR
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructured Loan |
TLGP
|
|
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program |
Treasury
|
|
U.S. Department of the Treasury |
UCS
|
|
Uniform Classification System |
Unizan
|
|
Unizan Financial Corp. |
USDA
|
|
U.S. Department of Agriculture |
VA
|
|
U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs |
VIE
|
|
Variable Interest Entity |
WGH
|
|
Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending |
4
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
When we refer to we, our, and us in this report, we mean Huntington Bancshares
Incorporated and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates that we refer only to
the parent company, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. When we refer to the Bank in this
report, we mean our only bank subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, and its subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
INTRODUCTION
We are a multi-state diversified regional bank holding company organized under Maryland law in
1966 and headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Through the Bank, we have 145 years of servicing the
financial needs of our customers. Through our subsidiaries, we provide full-service commercial and
consumer banking services, mortgage banking services, automobile financing, equipment leasing,
investment management, trust services, brokerage services, customized insurance service programs,
and other financial products and services. Our over 600 banking offices are located in Indiana,
Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Selected financial services and other
activities are also conducted in various other states. International banking services are
available through the headquarters office in Columbus, Ohio and a limited purpose office located in
the Cayman Islands and another limited purpose office located in Hong Kong. Our foreign banking
activities, in total or with any individual country, are not significant.
This MD&A provides information we believe necessary for understanding our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. The MD&A included in our
2010 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with this MD&A as this discussion provides only
material updates to the 2010 Form 10-K. This MD&A should also be read in conjunction with the
financial statements, notes and other information contained in this report.
Our discussion is divided into key segments:
|
|
|
Executive Overview - Provides a summary of our current financial performance, and
business overview, including our thoughts on the impact of the economy, legislative and
regulatory initiatives, and recent industry developments. This section also provides our
outlook regarding our expectations for the remainder of 2011. |
|
|
|
Discussion of Results of Operations - Reviews financial performance from a consolidated
Company perspective. It also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key
issues helpful for understanding performance trends. Key consolidated average balance sheet
and income statement trends are also discussed in this section. |
|
|
|
Risk Management and Capital - Discusses credit, market, liquidity, operational, and
compliance risks, including how these are managed, as well as performance trends. It also
includes a discussion of liquidity policies, how we obtain funding, and related
performance. In addition, there is a discussion of guarantees and / or commitments made for
items such as standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans, and a discussion
that reviews the adequacy of capital, including regulatory capital requirements. |
|
|
|
Business Segment Discussion - Provides an overview of financial performance for each of
our major business segments and provides additional discussion of trends underlying
consolidated financial performance. |
|
|
|
Additional Disclosures - Provides comments on important matters including
forward-looking statements, critical accounting policies and use of significant estimates,
recent accounting pronouncements and developments, and acquisitions. |
A reading of each section is important to understand fully the nature of our financial
performance and prospects.
5
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
Summary of 2011 First Quarter Results
For the quarter, we reported net income of $126.4 million, or $0.14 per common share, compared
with $122.9 million, or $0.05 per common share, in the prior quarter (see Table 1). The 2010
fourth quarter included a nonrecurring reduction of $0.07 per common share for the deemed dividend
resulting from the repurchase of $1.4 billion in TARP Capital.
Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income was $408.3 million for the quarter, down $10.7
million, or 3%, from the 2010 fourth quarter. The decline primarily reflected the impact of fewer
days and a decline in average investment securities. The fully-taxable equivalent net interest
margin increased to 3.42% from 3.37%.
Total noninterest income declined $27.3 million, or 10%. This reflected a $30.5 million, or
57%, decline in mortgage banking income from the prior quarter primarily related to a 49% decline
in mortgage originations. The anticipated decline was due to expected lower originations as
mortgage interest rates increased late in the prior quarter. The decline was partially offset by a
5% increase in trust services income and a 21% increase in brokerage income.
Total noninterest expense declined $3.9 million, or 1%, reflecting declines in legal costs as
collection activities declined, consulting expenses, OREO and foreclosure expense, and several
other expense categories. Partially offsetting these declines were $17.0 million in additions to
litigation reserves, seasonal increases in certain expenses, most notably personnel costs related
to the annual FICA and other benefit expense resets, as well as annual merit increases for
nonexecutives.
Credit quality performance in the current quarter continued to show significant improvement as
NALs and criticized loans declined 18% and 13%, respectively. NCOs were $165.1 million, or an
annualized 1.73% of average total loans and leases, down from $172.3 million, or 1.82%, in the 2010
fourth quarter. This helped drive a $37.6 million, or 43%, decline in the provision for credit
losses. While the ACL as a percentage of loans and leases was 3.07%, down from 3.39% at December
31, 2010, the ACL as a percentage of NALs increased to 185% from 166%.
On January 19, 2011, we repurchased for $49.1 million the warrant to purchase 23.6 million
common shares issued to the Treasury in connection with the CPP under the TARP. While the
repurchase of this warrant had the positive effect of removing any possible future share dilutive
impact, it negatively impacted our capital ratios. For example, the warrant repurchase negatively
impacted our tangible common equity ratio by 9 basis points. Despite this impact, as a result of
the first quarters earnings, our March 31, 2011, capital ratios increased from the end of last
year.
Business Overview
General
Our general business objectives are: (1) grow revenue and profitability, (2) grow key fee
businesses (existing and new), (3) improve credit quality, including lower NCOs and NPAs, (4)
improve cross-sell and share-of-wallet across all business segments, (5) reduce noncore CRE
exposure, and (6) continue to improve our overall management of risk.
Throughout last year, and continuing into this year, we are taking advantage of what we view
as an opportunity to make significant investments in strategic initiatives to position us for more
profitable and sustainable long-term growth. This includes implementing our Fair Play banking
philosophy value proposition for our customers, deepening product penetration, investing in
expanding existing business, and launching new businesses.
This quarter, we are especially pleased with the increase in our net interest margin as this
primarily reflected the benefit of continued growth in low cost noninterest-bearing demand
deposits. These represent our most profitable deposits and the primary customer banking
relationship. During the quarter, consumer checking account households grew at a 9% annualized
rate, reflecting the traction we are gaining with customers in our markets as they increasingly
embrace the benefits offered through our Fair Play banking philosophy with programs such as
24-Hour Grace on overdrafts.
Economy
Borrower and consumer confidence and the sustainability of the slow economic recovery remain
major factors impacting growth opportunities for the rest of 2011. Some signs that our footprint
states of Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia have been experiencing
cyclical recovery in line with, and in certain instances stronger than, the national average over
the past year include:
|
|
|
Increase in total payroll for all of our footprint states, with all but Indiana and West
Virginia (two of our smaller regions) exceeding the national average. |
|
|
|
Strong manufacturing growth providing a boost to the regional economy as evidenced by
the first manufacturing payroll growth since the 1990s. |
6
|
|
|
Decline in unemployment rates for all of our footprint states, except West Virginia. |
|
|
|
Combined exports from our footprint states have risen 51% between the recession low in
January 2009 and February 2011. |
|
|
|
With the exception of Michigan, the FHFA House Price Index in the Huntington footprint
states declined by less than the national average during the recession and all footprint
states outperformed the FHFA House Price Index during 2010. Overall regional vacancy rates
have shown signs of stabilization along with the national vacancy rate in 2010. |
Unfortunately, during the 2011 first quarter a number of issues have emerged that could
negatively impact the recovery. These include the continued instability in the Middle East with
its ramifications on the cost of oil translating to higher gas prices, and the crisis in Japan
which could negatively impact the production of consumer goods and services, most notably the
electronics and automobile sectors. In addition, above average office vacancy rates in large
metropolitan areas indicate the possibility for some continued softness in commercial real estate
in 2011. For now, we continue to believe that the economy will remain relatively stable throughout
2011, with the potential for improvement in the latter half.
Legislative and Regulatory
Legislative and regulatory reforms continue to be adopted which impose additional restrictions
on current business practices. Recent actions affecting us included an amendment to Reg E relating
to certain overdraft fees for consumer deposit accounts and the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Durbin Amendment
The Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act instructed the Federal Reserve to establish
the rate merchants pay banks for electronic clearing of debit card transactions (i.e., the
interchange rate). Interchange fees accounted for about $90 million, or just over 80%, of our
electronic banking income last year, our fourth largest fee income activity. In the fourth quarter,
the Federal Reserve put out a proposal for comment that would cap the interchange rate at either
$0.07 or $0.12 per transaction. While these rates are not finalized, if they stand, we estimate
that between 75%-85% of our interchange income could be lost. The new rate is scheduled to take
effect July 21, 2011.
Recent Industry Developments
Foreclosure Documentation We are continuing to evaluate our foreclosure process and procedures
given the recent consent orders entered into by some of the largest servicers regarding their
foreclosure activities. We have determined that there is no reason to conclude that foreclosures
were filed that should not have been filed. We have identified and are implementing process and
control enhancements to ensure that our foreclosure processes are in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations. We are consulting with counsel as necessary with respect to requirements
imposed on the largest servicers in the consent orders and by the courts in which foreclosure
proceedings are pending, which could impact our foreclosure actions.
Representation and Warranty Reserve We primarily conduct our loan sale and securitization
activity with FNMA and FHLMC. In connection with these and other sale and securitization
transactions, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria,
such as collateral type and underwriting standards. In the future, we may be required to repurchase
individual loans and / or indemnify these organizations against losses due to material breaches of
these representations and warranties. At March 31, 2011, we have a reserve for such losses of $23.8
million, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.
Mortgage Servicing Rights MSR fair values are estimated based on residential mortgage servicing
revenue in excess of estimated market costs to service the underlying loans. Historically, the
estimated market cost to service has been stable. Due to changes in the regulatory environment
related to loan servicing and foreclosure activities, costs to service may potentially increase,
however the potential impact on the market costs to service remains uncertain. Certain large
residential mortgage loan servicers entered into consent orders with banking regulators in April
2011, which require the banks to remedy deficiencies and unsafe or unsound practices and to enhance
residential mortgage servicing and foreclosure processes. It is unclear what impact this may
ultimately have on market costs to service. At March 31, 2011, we estimated a 25% increase to our
loan servicing market cost assumption would result in a fair value impairment charge of
approximately $8 million.
Expectations
We are optimistic about our prospects for continued earnings growth for the rest of the year.
Net income is expected to grow from the current quarter level throughout the rest of the year
as pretax, pre-provision income rebounds from the current quarters level.
7
We believe the momentum we are seeing in loan and deposit growth, coupled with a stable net
interest margin, will contribute to growth in net interest income. Our C&I portfolio is expected
to continue to show meaningful growth with much of this reflecting the positive impact from
strategic initiatives to expand our commercial lending expertise into areas like specialty banking,
asset based lending, and equipment financing, in addition to our long-standing continued support of
small business lending. Growth in automobile loans is also expected to remain strong, aided by our
recent expansion into new markets. Home equity and residential mortgages are likely to show only
modest growth until there is more consumer confidence in the sustainability of the economic
recovery. Our noncore CRE portfolio is expected to continue to decline, but likely at a slower
rate.
We anticipate our core deposits will continue to grow, reflecting growth in consumer
households and business relationships. Further, we expect the shift toward lower-cost
noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts will continue.
From a fee income perspective, first quarter results reflect for the most part the negative
run rate impacts from the decline in mortgage banking income and deposit service charges. Mortgage
banking income will likely show only modest, if any, growth throughout the rest of this year.
Service charge income should begin to show modest growth later in this year as the benefits from
our Fair Play banking philosophy continue to gain momentum commensurate with consumer household
growth and increased product penetration.
Electronic banking income in the second half of the year could be negatively impacted by as
much as $45 million if the Federal Reserves currently proposed interchange fee structure is
implemented July 21, 2011 as planned. There are some congressional movements to block or postpone
the implementation, but any outcome is uncertain at this time. We also expect to see continued
growth in the earnings contribution from other key fee income activities including capital markets,
treasury management services, and brokerage, reflecting the impact of our cross-sell and product
penetration initiatives throughout the Company, as well as the positive impact from strategic
initiatives.
Expense levels are expected to remain relatively stable with declines resulting from continued
low credit costs and improved expense efficiencies, offset by continued investments in strategic
initiatives.
Nonaccrual loans are expected to decline meaningfully throughout the year.
We anticipate an effective tax rate for the remainder of the year to approximate 35% of income
before income taxes less approximately $60.0 million of permanent tax differences over the
remainder of 2011 primarily related to tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, and general
business credits.
8
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section provides a review of financial performance from a consolidated perspective. It
also includes a Significant Items section that summarizes key issues important for a complete
understanding of performance trends. Key Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and
Statement of Income trends are discussed. All earnings per share data are reported on a diluted
basis. For additional insight on financial performance, please read this section in conjunction
with the Business Segment Discussion.
9
Table 1 Selected Quarterly Income Statement Data (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
501,877 |
|
|
$ |
528,291 |
|
|
$ |
534,669 |
|
|
$ |
535,653 |
|
|
$ |
546,779 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
97,547 |
|
|
|
112,997 |
|
|
|
124,707 |
|
|
|
135,997 |
|
|
|
152,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
404,330 |
|
|
|
415,294 |
|
|
|
409,962 |
|
|
|
399,656 |
|
|
|
393,893 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
49,385 |
|
|
|
86,973 |
|
|
|
119,160 |
|
|
|
193,406 |
|
|
|
235,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
354,945 |
|
|
|
328,321 |
|
|
|
290,802 |
|
|
|
206,250 |
|
|
|
158,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
54,324 |
|
|
|
55,810 |
|
|
|
65,932 |
|
|
|
75,934 |
|
|
|
69,339 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
53,169 |
|
|
|
52,045 |
|
|
|
45,530 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
Trust services income |
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
29,394 |
|
|
|
26,997 |
|
|
|
28,399 |
|
|
|
27,765 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
28,900 |
|
|
|
28,090 |
|
|
|
28,107 |
|
|
|
25,137 |
|
Insurance income |
|
|
17,945 |
|
|
|
19,678 |
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
18,074 |
|
|
|
18,860 |
|
Brokerage income |
|
|
20,511 |
|
|
|
16,953 |
|
|
|
16,575 |
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
16,902 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
16,113 |
|
|
|
14,091 |
|
|
|
14,392 |
|
|
|
16,470 |
|
Automobile operating lease income |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
10,463 |
|
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
12,303 |
|
Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
38,247 |
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
32,552 |
|
|
|
28,784 |
|
|
|
29,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
236,945 |
|
|
|
264,220 |
|
|
|
267,143 |
|
|
|
269,643 |
|
|
|
240,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
219,028 |
|
|
|
212,184 |
|
|
|
208,272 |
|
|
|
194,875 |
|
|
|
183,642 |
|
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
40,282 |
|
|
|
40,943 |
|
|
|
38,553 |
|
|
|
40,670 |
|
|
|
39,082 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
28,436 |
|
|
|
26,670 |
|
|
|
26,718 |
|
|
|
25,388 |
|
|
|
29,086 |
|
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
23,406 |
|
|
|
26,067 |
|
|
|
24,755 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
13,465 |
|
|
|
21,021 |
|
|
|
20,672 |
|
|
|
24,388 |
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,477 |
|
|
|
22,060 |
|
|
|
21,651 |
|
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
20,624 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
|
|
20,921 |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
15,046 |
|
|
|
15,145 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
|
|
15,146 |
|
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
12,047 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
11,530 |
|
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
9,667 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
48,083 |
|
|
|
38,537 |
|
|
|
30,765 |
|
|
|
33,377 |
|
|
|
30,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
430,699 |
|
|
|
434,593 |
|
|
|
427,309 |
|
|
|
413,810 |
|
|
|
398,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
161,191 |
|
|
|
157,948 |
|
|
|
130,636 |
|
|
|
62,083 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
34,745 |
|
|
|
35,048 |
|
|
|
29,690 |
|
|
|
13,319 |
|
|
|
(38,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
$ |
122,900 |
|
|
$ |
100,946 |
|
|
$ |
48,764 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
7,703 |
|
|
|
83,754 |
|
|
|
29,495 |
|
|
|
29,426 |
|
|
|
29,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
118,743 |
|
|
$ |
39,146 |
|
|
$ |
71,451 |
|
|
$ |
19,338 |
|
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares basic |
|
|
863,359 |
|
|
|
757,924 |
|
|
|
716,911 |
|
|
|
716,580 |
|
|
|
716,320 |
|
Average common shares diluted(2) |
|
|
867,237 |
|
|
|
760,582 |
|
|
|
719,567 |
|
|
|
719,387 |
|
|
|
718,593 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Return on average total assets |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
Return on average common shareholders equity |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Return on average common tangible shareholders equity(3) |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Net interest margin(4) |
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
Efficiency ratio(5) |
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
(2,317.1 |
) |
Revenue FTE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
404,330 |
|
|
$ |
415,294 |
|
|
$ |
409,962 |
|
|
$ |
399,656 |
|
|
$ |
393,893 |
|
FTE adjustment |
|
|
3,945 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(4) |
|
|
408,275 |
|
|
|
419,002 |
|
|
|
412,593 |
|
|
|
402,146 |
|
|
|
396,141 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
236,945 |
|
|
|
264,220 |
|
|
|
267,143 |
|
|
|
269,643 |
|
|
|
240,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue(4) |
|
$ |
645,220 |
|
|
$ |
683,222 |
|
|
$ |
679,736 |
|
|
$ |
671,789 |
|
|
$ |
636,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comparisons for presented periods are impacted by a number of factors. Refer
to Significant Items for additional discussion regarding these key factors. |
10
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For all periods presented, the impact of the convertible preferred stock issued in
2008 and the warrants issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2008 related to Huntingtons
participation in the voluntary Capital Purchase Program was excluded
from the diluted share calculation because the result was more than basic earnings per common share
(anti-dilutive) for the periods. The convertible preferred stock and warrants were repurchased in
December 2010, and January 2011, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Net income excluding expense for amortization of intangibles for the period divided
by average tangible shareholders equity. Average tangible shareholders equity equals average
total shareholders equity less average intangible assets and goodwill. Expense for amortization
of intangibles and average intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated
assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(4) |
|
On a fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) basis assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(5) |
|
Noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles and goodwill impairment
divided by the sum of FTE net interest income and noninterest income excluding securities gains
(losses). |
Significant Items
Definition of Significant Items
From time-to-time, revenue, expenses, or taxes, are impacted by items judged by us to be
outside of ordinary banking activities and / or by items that, while they may be associated with
ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by us at
that time to be infrequent or short-term in nature. We refer to such items as Significant Items.
Most often, these Significant Items result from factors originating outside the Company; e.g.,
regulatory actions / assessments, windfall gains, changes in accounting principles, one-time tax
assessments / refunds, litigation actions, etc. In other cases, they may result from our decisions
associated with significant corporate actions out of the ordinary course of business; e.g., merger
/ restructuring charges, recapitalization actions, goodwill impairment, etc.
Even though certain revenue and expense items are naturally subject to more volatility than
others due to changes in market and economic environment conditions, as a general rule volatility
alone does not define a Significant Item. For example, changes in the provision for credit losses,
gains / losses from investment activities, asset valuation writedowns, etc., reflect ordinary
banking activities and are, therefore, typically excluded from consideration as a Significant Item.
We believe the disclosure of Significant Items provides a better understanding of our
performance and trends to ascertain which of such items, if any, to include or exclude from an
analysis of our performance; i.e., within the context of determining how that performance differed
from expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust estimates of future performance
accordingly. To this end, we adopted a practice of listing Significant Items in our external
disclosure documents (e.g., earnings press releases, investor presentations, Forms 10-Q and 10-K).
Significant Items for any particular period are not intended to be a complete list of items
that may materially impact current or future period performance.
Significant Items Influencing Financial Performance Comparisons
Earnings comparisons were impacted by the Significant Items summarized below.
|
1. |
|
Litigation Reserve. During the 2011 first quarter, $17.0 million of additions to
litigation reserves were recorded as other noninterest expense. This resulted in a negative
impact of $0.01 per common share. |
|
2. |
|
TARP Capital Purchase Program Repurchase. During the 2010 fourth quarter, we issued $920.0
million of our common stock and $300.0 million of subordinated debt. The net proceeds, along
with other available funds, were used to repurchase all $1.4 billion of TARP capital that we
issued to the Treasury under its TARP CPP in 2008. As part of this transaction, there was a
deemed dividend that did not impact net income, but resulted in a negative impact of $0.07
per common share for the 2010 fourth quarter. |
|
3. |
|
Franklin Relationship. Our relationship with Franklin was acquired in the Sky Financial
acquisition in 2007. On March 31, 2009, we restructured our relationship with Franklin.
During the 2010 first quarter, a $38.2 million ($0.05 per common share) net tax benefit was
recognized, primarily reflecting the increase in the net deferred tax asset relating to the
assets acquired from the March 31, 2009 restructuring. |
11
The following table reflects the earnings impact of the above-mentioned significant items for
periods affected by this Results of Operations discussion:
Table 2 Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
After-tax |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
After-tax |
|
|
EPS |
|
Net income GAAP |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, after-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Change from prior quarter $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Change from prior quarter % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.R. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change from year-ago $ |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.80 |
|
Change from year-ago % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.R. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Items - favorable (unfavorable) impact: |
|
Earnings (1) |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Earnings (1) |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
Earnings (1) |
|
|
EPS |
|
Net tax benefit recognized (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,222 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
Litigation reserves addition |
|
|
(17,028 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock conversion
deemed dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.R. not relevant. The numerator of the calculation is a positive value and the dominator is a negative value. |
|
(1) |
|
Pretax unless otherwise noted. |
|
(2) |
|
After-tax. |
Pretax, Pre-provision Income Trends
One non-GAAP performance measurement that we believe is useful in analyzing our underlying
performance trends is pretax, pre-provision income. This is the level of pretax earnings adjusted
to exclude the impact of: (a) provision expense, (b) investment securities gains/losses, which are
excluded because securities market valuations may become particularly volatile in times of economic
stress, (c) amortization of intangibles expense, which is excluded because the return on tangible
common equity is a key measurement we use to gauge performance trends, and (d) certain other items
identified by us (see Significant Items) that we believe may distort our underlying performance
trends.
The following table reflects pretax, pre-provision income for each of the past five quarters:
Table 3 Pretax, Pre-provision Income (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
161,191 |
|
|
$ |
157,948 |
|
|
$ |
130,636 |
|
|
$ |
62,083 |
|
|
$ |
1,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Provision for credit losses |
|
|
49,385 |
|
|
|
86,973 |
|
|
|
119,160 |
|
|
|
193,406 |
|
|
|
235,008 |
|
Less: Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Add: Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
15,046 |
|
|
|
15,145 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
|
|
15,146 |
|
Less: Litigation reserves addition |
|
|
(17,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax, pre-provision income |
|
$ |
240,934 |
|
|
$ |
260,070 |
|
|
$ |
265,237 |
|
|
$ |
270,474 |
|
|
$ |
251,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in total pretax, pre-provision income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior quarter change amount |
|
$ |
(19,136 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,167 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,237 |
) |
|
$ |
18,645 |
|
|
$ |
9,768 |
|
Prior quarter change percent |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pretax, pre-provision income is a non-GAAP financial measure. Any ratio utilizing this financial measure is also non-GAAP. This financial measure has been included as
it is considered to be an important metric with which to analyze and evaluate our results of operations and financial strength. Other companies may calculate this
financial measure differently. |
12
Pretax, pre-provision income was $240.9 million in the 2011 first quarter, down $19.1
million, or 7%, from the prior quarter. From a run-rate basis, the decline reflected:
|
|
|
$8.8 million seasonal reduction in revenue as the current quarter had fewer days than
the prior quarter. This included a $7.0 million reduction in net interest income and a
$1.8 million reduction in service charge and electronic banking income. |
|
|
|
$6.9 million seasonal increase in noninterest expense, primarily associated with the
annual reset of FICA and other payroll taxes. |
Net Interest Income / Average Balance Sheet
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 First Quarter
Fully-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $12.1 million, or 3%, from the year-ago
quarter. This reflected the benefit of a $2.1 billion, or 5%, increase in average earning assets.
The FTE net interest margin declined to 3.42% from 3.47%. The increase in average earning assets
reflected a combination of factors including:
|
|
|
$1.1 billion, or 3%, increase in average total loans and leases. |
|
|
|
$1.1 billion, or 13%, increase in average total available-for-sale and other securities,
reflecting the deployment of cash from core deposit growth. |
The 5 basis point decline in the FTE net interest margin reflected the impact of stronger
deposit growth funding available-for-sale and other securities purchases at a lower incremental
spread.
The following table details the change in our average loans and leases and deposits:
Table 4 Average Loans/Leases and Deposits 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loans/Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,121 |
|
|
$ |
12,314 |
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
7,677 |
|
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
|
19,991 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Automobile |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,728 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
16,989 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
38,098 |
|
|
$ |
36,980 |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
7,333 |
|
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Demand deposits interest-bearing |
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
5,716 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Money market deposits |
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
10,340 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Savings and other domestic time
deposits |
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,391 |
|
|
|
9,976 |
|
|
|
(1,585 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
39,274 |
|
|
|
37,272 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
41,664 |
|
|
$ |
40,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $1.1 billion, or 3%, increase in average total loans and leases primarily reflected:
|
|
|
$1.5 billion, or 34%, increase in the average automobile portfolio. Automobile lending
is a core competency and continued to be an area of growth. The growth from the year-ago
quarter exhibited further penetration within our historical geographic footprint, as well
as the positive impact of our expansion into Eastern Pennsylvania and five New England
states. Origination quality remained high. |
|
|
|
$0.8 billion, or 7%, increase in the average C&I portfolio. Growth from the year-ago
quarter reflected the benefits from our strategic initiatives including large corporate,
asset based lending, and equipment finance. In addition, we continued to see growth in
automobile floor plan lending as well as more traditional middle-market loans. This growth
is evident despite line-of-credit utilization rates that remain well below historical
norms. |
|
|
|
$0.2 billion, or 3%, increase in the average home equity portfolio, reflecting higher
originations and continued slower runoff. |
13
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$1.2 billion, or 15%, decrease in average CRE loans reflecting the continued execution
of our plan to reduce CRE exposure, primarily in the noncore CRE segment. This reduction
will continue through 2011, reflecting normal amortization,
paydowns, and refinancing. |
Average total deposits increased $1.4 billion, or 4%, from the year-ago quarter reflecting:
|
|
|
$2.0 billion, or 5%, growth in average total core deposits. The drivers of this change
were a $3.2 billion, or 30%, growth in average money market deposits, and a $0.7 billion,
or 11%, growth in average noninterest-bearing demand deposits. These increases were
partially offset by a $1.6 billion, or 16%, decline in average core certificates of deposit
and a $0.4 billion, or 6%, decrease in average interest-bearing demand deposits.
Contributing to the growth in noninterest-bearing demand deposits was 7% growth in the
number of retail banking DDA households. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.4 billion, or 23%, decline in average brokered deposits and negotiable CDs,
reflecting a strategy of reducing such noncore funding. |
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 Fourth Quarter
FTE net interest income decreased $10.7 million, or 3%, from the 2010 fourth quarter. This
reflected a 2% (8% annualized) decrease in average earning assets as the FTE net interest margin
increased to 3.42% from 3.37%. The decrease in average earning assets reflected a combination of
factors including:
|
|
|
$0.6 billion, or 6% (25% annualized), decrease in average available-for-sale and other
securities, primarily related to two funding requirements. The first was to fund the
repurchase of TARP capital and related warrants and the second was the $0.4 billion decline
in noncore deposits. |
|
|
|
$0.4 billion, or 46%, decline in loans held for sale as our mortgage pipeline slowed
considerably during the current quarter. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.3 billion, or 1% (3% annualized), increase in average total loans and leases. |
The net interest margin increased 5 basis points, reflecting the positive impacts of increases
in lower cost deposits, improved deposit pricing, and day count, partially offset by the negative
impacts of a reduction in swap income, lower loan yields, and the issuance of subordinated debt.
14
The following table details the change in our average loans / leases and deposits:
Table 5 Average Loans/Leases and Deposits 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loans/Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,121 |
|
|
$ |
12,767 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
|
19,565 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,728 |
|
|
|
7,709 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
38,098 |
|
|
$ |
37,800 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
7,333 |
|
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Demand deposits interest-bearing |
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Savings and other domestic time
deposits |
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,391 |
|
|
|
8,646 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
39,274 |
|
|
|
38,949 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
41,664 |
|
|
$ |
41,704 |
|
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $0.3 billion, or 1% (3% annualized), increase in average total loans and leases primarily
reflected:
|
|
|
$0.4 billion, or 3% (11% annualized), growth in the average C&I portfolio. The growth
in the C&I portfolio during the 2011 first quarter came from several business lines
including large corporate, middle market, asset based lending, automobile floor plan
lending, and equipment finance. On a geographic basis, nine of our eleven regions
experienced loan growth in the quarter, adding to the diversity of the portfolio growth.
Line-of-credit utilization rates remained low and little changed from the end of the prior
quarter. |
|
|
|
$0.2 billion, or 3% (13% annualized), growth in the average automobile portfolio. We
continue to originate high quality loans with acceptable returns. To date, we have seen no
material change in our outlook for automobile originations as a result of the crisis in
Japan. While the crisis in Japan has resulted in a selective slowdown in automobile
production, we currently do not see this having a material negative impact on our
automobile finance business. We focus on larger, multi-franchised, well-capitalized
dealers that are rarely reliant on the success of one franchise to generate profitability.
In addition, the slowdown is only impacting new automobile production, which is providing
support to used automobile pricing and sales activity. More than half of our loan
production represents used automobile financing. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.3 billion, or 4% (16% annualized), decline in average CRE loans, primarily as a
result of our ongoing strategy to reduce our exposure to the commercial real estate market.
The decline in noncore CRE accounted for 63% of the decline in the total CRE portfolio.
The noncore CRE declines reflected paydowns, refinancing, and NCOs. The core CRE portfolio
continued to exhibit high quality characteristics with minimal downgrade or NCO activity. |
Average total deposits were little changed from the prior quarter reflecting:
|
|
|
$0.3 billion, or 1% (3% annualized), growth in average total core deposits. The primary
drivers of this growth were a 3% (10% annualized) increase in average money market
deposits, partially reflecting funds from maturing CDs flowing into money market accounts
given the low absolute level of rates on new CD offerings. The growth in average total
core deposits also reflected 2% (8% annualized) growth in average noninterest-bearing
demand deposits. Contributing to the growth in noninterest-bearing demand deposits was a
9% annualized prior quarter growth in consumer checking account households. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$0.2 billion, or 10% (42% annualized), decline in average brokered deposits and
negotiable CDs, reflecting a strategy of reducing such noncore funding. |
15
Tables 6 and 7 reflect quarterly average balance sheets and rates earned and paid on
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Table 6 Consolidated Quarterly Average Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
1Q11 vs. 1Q10 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
)% |
Trading account securities |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Available-for-sale and other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
9,108 |
|
|
|
9,747 |
|
|
|
8,876 |
|
|
|
8,369 |
|
|
|
8,027 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale and other securities |
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
10,196 |
|
|
|
9,241 |
|
|
|
8,758 |
|
|
|
8,470 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Loans and leases: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
13,121 |
|
|
|
12,767 |
|
|
|
12,393 |
|
|
|
12,244 |
|
|
|
12,314 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
5,913 |
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
|
|
6,084 |
|
|
|
6,085 |
|
|
|
6,268 |
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
7,073 |
|
|
|
7,364 |
|
|
|
7,677 |
|
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
|
19,565 |
|
|
|
19,466 |
|
|
|
19,608 |
|
|
|
19,991 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
5,140 |
|
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,728 |
|
|
|
7,709 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
4,430 |
|
|
|
4,389 |
|
|
|
4,608 |
|
|
|
4,477 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
18,235 |
|
|
|
17,749 |
|
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
16,989 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
38,098 |
|
|
|
37,800 |
|
|
|
37,215 |
|
|
|
37,089 |
|
|
|
36,980 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
(1,323 |
) |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
(1,506 |
) |
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
|
36,867 |
|
|
|
36,477 |
|
|
|
35,831 |
|
|
|
35,583 |
|
|
|
35,470 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
48,345 |
|
|
|
49,290 |
|
|
|
47,511 |
|
|
|
46,606 |
|
|
|
46,240 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Intangible assets |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
All other assets |
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
4,486 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
53,369 |
|
|
$ |
54,146 |
|
|
$ |
52,717 |
|
|
$ |
51,703 |
|
|
$ |
51,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
7,333 |
|
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
|
$ |
6,768 |
|
|
$ |
6,849 |
|
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Demand deposits interest-bearing |
|
|
5,357 |
|
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
5,971 |
|
|
|
5,716 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Money market deposits |
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
12,336 |
|
|
|
11,103 |
|
|
|
10,340 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
4,640 |
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,391 |
|
|
|
8,646 |
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
9,976 |
|
|
|
(1,585 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
39,274 |
|
|
|
38,949 |
|
|
|
38,010 |
|
|
|
37,799 |
|
|
|
37,272 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
41,664 |
|
|
|
41,704 |
|
|
|
40,646 |
|
|
|
40,367 |
|
|
|
40,223 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
4,062 |
|
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
40,020 |
|
|
|
40,320 |
|
|
|
39,477 |
|
|
|
38,532 |
|
|
|
38,764 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
5,022 |
|
|
|
5,645 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
5,364 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
53,369 |
|
|
$ |
54,146 |
|
|
$ |
52,717 |
|
|
$ |
51,703 |
|
|
$ |
51,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,667 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans. |
16
Table 7 Consolidated Quarterly Net Interest Margin Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Rates (2) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Fully-taxable equivalent basis (1) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
Trading account securities |
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
Available-for-sale and other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale and other securities |
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
Loans and leases: (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
7.92 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits noninterest-bearing |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Demand deposits interest-bearing |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
2.68 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
Impact of noninterest-bearing funds on margin |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
FTE yields are calculated assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Loan and lease and deposit average rates include impact of applicable derivatives, non-deferrable fees, and amortized deferred fees. |
|
(3) |
|
For purposes of this analysis, NALs are reflected in the average balances of loans. |
17
Provision for Credit Losses
(This section should be read in conjunction with the Credit Risk section.)
The provision for credit losses is the expense necessary to maintain the ALLL and the AULC at
levels adequate to absorb our estimate of inherent credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio
and the portfolio of unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.
The provision for credit losses for the 2011 first quarter was $49.4 million, down $37.6
million, or 43%, from the prior quarter and down $185.6 million, or 79%, from the year-ago quarter.
Reflecting the resolution of problem credits for which reserves had previously been established,
the current quarters provision for credit losses was $115.7 million less than total NCOs (see
Credit Quality discussion).
Noninterest Income
The following table reflects noninterest income for each of the past five quarters:
Table 8 Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
54,324 |
|
|
$ |
55,810 |
|
|
$ |
65,932 |
|
|
$ |
75,934 |
|
|
$ |
69,339 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
53,169 |
|
|
|
52,045 |
|
|
|
45,530 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
Trust services income |
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
29,394 |
|
|
|
26,997 |
|
|
|
28,399 |
|
|
|
27,765 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
28,900 |
|
|
|
28,090 |
|
|
|
28,107 |
|
|
|
25,137 |
|
Insurance income |
|
|
17,945 |
|
|
|
19,678 |
|
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
18,074 |
|
|
|
18,860 |
|
Brokerage income |
|
|
20,511 |
|
|
|
16,953 |
|
|
|
16,575 |
|
|
|
18,425 |
|
|
|
16,902 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
16,113 |
|
|
|
14,091 |
|
|
|
14,392 |
|
|
|
16,470 |
|
Automobile operating lease income |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
10,463 |
|
|
|
11,356 |
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
12,303 |
|
Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
38,247 |
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
32,552 |
|
|
|
28,784 |
|
|
|
29,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
236,945 |
|
|
$ |
264,220 |
|
|
$ |
267,143 |
|
|
$ |
269,643 |
|
|
$ |
240,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The following table details mortgage banking income and the net impact of MSR hedging
activity for each of the past five quarters:
Table 9 Mortgage Banking Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands, except as noted) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Mortgage Banking Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination and secondary marketing |
|
$ |
19,799 |
|
|
$ |
48,236 |
|
|
$ |
35,840 |
|
|
$ |
19,778 |
|
|
$ |
13,586 |
|
Servicing fees |
|
|
12,546 |
|
|
|
11,474 |
|
|
|
12,053 |
|
|
|
12,178 |
|
|
|
12,418 |
|
Amortization of capitalized servicing |
|
|
(9,863 |
) |
|
|
(13,960 |
) |
|
|
(13,003 |
) |
|
|
(10,137 |
) |
|
|
(10,065 |
) |
Other mortgage banking income |
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
4,789 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
3,664 |
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
26,251 |
|
|
|
50,539 |
|
|
|
39,856 |
|
|
|
25,483 |
|
|
|
19,149 |
|
MSR valuation adjustment(1) |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
31,319 |
|
|
|
(12,047 |
) |
|
|
(26,221 |
) |
|
|
(5,772 |
) |
Net trading (losses) gains related to MSR hedging |
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(28,689 |
) |
|
|
24,236 |
|
|
|
46,268 |
|
|
|
11,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage banking income |
|
$ |
22,684 |
|
|
$ |
53,169 |
|
|
$ |
52,045 |
|
|
$ |
45,530 |
|
|
$ |
25,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage originations (in millions) |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,619 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
Average trading account securities used to hedge
MSRs (in millions) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights(2) |
|
|
202,559 |
|
|
|
196,194 |
|
|
|
161,594 |
|
|
|
179,138 |
|
|
|
207,552 |
|
Total mortgages serviced for others (in millions)(2) |
|
|
16,456 |
|
|
|
15,933 |
|
|
|
15,713 |
|
|
|
15,954 |
|
|
|
15,968 |
|
MSR % of investor servicing portfolio |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Impact of MSR Hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR valuation adjustment(1) |
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
31,319 |
|
|
$ |
(12,047 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,772 |
) |
Net trading (losses) gains related to MSR
hedging |
|
|
(4,341 |
) |
|
|
(28,689 |
) |
|
|
24,236 |
|
|
|
46,268 |
|
|
|
11,661 |
|
Net interest income related to MSR hedging |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) gain of MSR hedging |
|
$ |
(3,468 |
) |
|
$ |
3,343 |
|
|
$ |
12,221 |
|
|
$ |
20,105 |
|
|
$ |
6,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The change in fair value for the period represents the MSR valuation adjustment, net of amortization of capitalized servicing. |
|
(2) |
|
At period end. |
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 First Quarter
Noninterest income decreased $3.9 million, or 2%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 10 Noninterest Income 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Service charges on
deposit accounts |
|
$ |
54,324 |
|
|
$ |
69,339 |
|
|
$ |
(15,015 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
)% |
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Trust services income |
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
27,765 |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
25,137 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Insurance income |
|
|
17,945 |
|
|
|
18,860 |
|
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Brokerage income |
|
|
20,511 |
|
|
|
16,902 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Bank owned life
insurance income |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
16,470 |
|
|
|
(1,651 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Automobile operating
lease income |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
12,303 |
|
|
|
(3,456 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
N.R. |
|
Other income |
|
|
38,247 |
|
|
|
29,069 |
|
|
|
9,178 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
236,945 |
|
|
$ |
240,852 |
|
|
$ |
(3,907 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.R. Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period. |
19
The $3.9 million, or 2%, decrease in total noninterest income from the year-ago quarter
reflected:
|
|
|
$15.0 million, or 22%, decline in service charges on deposit accounts, reflecting lower
consumer service charges due to a combination of factors including the implementation of
the amendment to Reg E, our Fair Play banking philosophy, and lower underlying activity
levels. |
|
|
|
$3.5 million, or 28%, decline in automobile operating lease income reflecting the impact
of a declining portfolio as a result of having exited that business in 2008. |
|
|
|
$2.4 million, or 9%, decrease in mortgage banking income. This primarily reflected a
$9.5 million reduction in MSR net hedging income (losses), as the current quarter reflected
a $3.6 million net loss, partially offset by a $6.2 million, or 46%, increase in
origination and secondary marketing income, as originations increased 7% from the year-ago
quarter. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$9.2 million, or 32%, increase in other income, of which $7.5 million was associated
with increased gains from the sale of SBA loans. Also contributing to the growth were
increases from capital market activities and the sale of interest rate protection products. |
|
|
|
$3.6 million, or 15%, increase in electronic banking income, reflecting an increase in
debit card transaction volume and new account growth. |
|
|
|
$3.6 million, or 21%, increase in brokerage income, primarily reflecting increased sales
of investment products. |
|
|
|
$3.0 million, or 11%, increase in trust services income, reflecting increases in asset
market values, net growth in accounts, and higher fees for income tax preparation. |
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 Fourth Quarter
Noninterest income decreased $27.3 million, or 10%, from the prior quarter.
Table 11 Noninterest Income 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Service charges on
deposit accounts |
|
$ |
54,324 |
|
|
$ |
55,810 |
|
|
$ |
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
53,169 |
|
|
|
(30,485 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Trust services income |
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
29,394 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
28,900 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance income |
|
|
17,945 |
|
|
|
19,678 |
|
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Brokerage income |
|
|
20,511 |
|
|
|
16,953 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Bank owned life
insurance income |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
16,113 |
|
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Automobile operating
lease income |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
10,463 |
|
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
N.R. |
|
Other income |
|
|
38,247 |
|
|
|
33,843 |
|
|
|
4,404 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
236,945 |
|
|
$ |
264,220 |
|
|
$ |
(27,275 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.R. Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period. |
The $27.3 million, or 10%, decrease in total noninterest income from the prior quarter
reflected:
|
|
|
$30.5 million, or 57%, decline in mortgage banking income. The decrease primarily
resulted from a $28.4 million, or 59%, reduction in origination and secondary marketing
income. Mortgage originations declined to $0.9 billion, or 49%, from $1.8 billion in the
prior quarter, reflecting a rise in mortgage interest rates late in the 2010 fourth
quarter, thus decreasing refinancing and purchase activity. The decline also reflected a
$6.2 million reduction associated with MSR hedging activities as the current quarter
reflected $3.6 million of MSR net hedging losses compared with $2.6 million of such gains
in the prior quarter. |
20
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$4.4 million, or 13%, growth in other income, reflecting a $4.8 million increase in
gains on the sale of SBA loans. |
|
|
|
$3.6 million, or 21%, growth in brokerage income, reflecting increased annuity sales. |
Noninterest Expense
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 1.)
The following table reflects noninterest expense for each of the past five quarters:
Table 12 Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
219,028 |
|
|
$ |
212,184 |
|
|
$ |
208,272 |
|
|
$ |
194,875 |
|
|
$ |
183,642 |
|
Outside data processing and other
services |
|
|
40,282 |
|
|
|
40,943 |
|
|
|
38,553 |
|
|
|
40,670 |
|
|
|
39,082 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
28,436 |
|
|
|
26,670 |
|
|
|
26,718 |
|
|
|
25,388 |
|
|
|
29,086 |
|
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
23,406 |
|
|
|
26,067 |
|
|
|
24,755 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
13,465 |
|
|
|
21,021 |
|
|
|
20,672 |
|
|
|
24,388 |
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,477 |
|
|
|
22,060 |
|
|
|
21,651 |
|
|
|
21,585 |
|
|
|
20,624 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
|
|
20,921 |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
15,046 |
|
|
|
15,145 |
|
|
|
15,141 |
|
|
|
15,146 |
|
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
12,047 |
|
|
|
4,970 |
|
|
|
11,530 |
|
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
9,667 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
48,083 |
|
|
|
38,537 |
|
|
|
30,765 |
|
|
|
33,377 |
|
|
|
30,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
430,699 |
|
|
$ |
434,593 |
|
|
$ |
427,309 |
|
|
$ |
413,810 |
|
|
$ |
398,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (FTE), at period-end |
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
11,341 |
|
|
|
11,279 |
|
|
|
11,117 |
|
|
|
10,678 |
|
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 First Quarter
Noninterest expense increased $32.6 million, or 8%, from the year-ago quarter.
Table 13 Noninterest Expense 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
219,028 |
|
|
$ |
183,642 |
|
|
$ |
35,386 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Outside data processing and other
services |
|
|
40,282 |
|
|
|
39,082 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
28,436 |
|
|
|
29,086 |
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
|
24,755 |
|
|
|
(6,859 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Professional services |
|
|
13,465 |
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
|
|
(9,232 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Equipment |
|
|
22,477 |
|
|
|
20,624 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
|
|
5,742 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
15,146 |
|
|
|
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
11,530 |
|
|
|
(7,599 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
48,083 |
|
|
|
30,312 |
|
|
|
17,771 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
430,699 |
|
|
$ |
398,093 |
|
|
$ |
32,606 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (FTE), at period-end |
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
10,678 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
21
The $32.6 million, or 8%, increase in total noninterest expense from the year-ago quarter
reflected:
|
|
|
$35.4 million, or 19%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting a 6% increase
in full-time equivalent staff in support of strategic initiatives, as well as higher
benefit related expenses, including the reinstatement of our 401(k) plan matching
contribution in the second quarter of last year. |
|
|
|
$17.8 million, or 59%, increase in other expense, primarily reflecting $17.0 million of
expense associated with additions to litigation reserves in the current quarter. |
|
|
|
$5.7 million, or 51%, increase in marketing expense, reflecting increases in branding
and product advertising activities in support of strategic initiatives. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$9.2 million, or 41%, decrease in professional services, reflecting a decline in costs
related to collection activities and consulting expenses. |
|
|
|
$7.6 million, or 66%, decline in OREO and foreclosure expense, reflecting a 64% decline
in OREO from the year-ago quarter. |
|
|
|
$6.9 million, or 28%, decline in deposit and other insurance expense. |
|
|
|
$3.2 million, or 32%, decline in automobile operating lease expense as that portfolio
continued to run-off. |
2011 First Quarter versus 2010 Fourth Quarter
Noninterest expense decreased $3.9 million, or 1%, from the prior quarter.
Table 14 Noninterest Expense 2011 First Quarter vs. 2010 Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
219,028 |
|
|
$ |
212,184 |
|
|
$ |
6,844 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Outside data processing and other
services |
|
|
40,282 |
|
|
|
40,943 |
|
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net occupancy |
|
|
28,436 |
|
|
|
26,670 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
|
23,320 |
|
|
|
(5,424 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Professional services |
|
|
13,465 |
|
|
|
21,021 |
|
|
|
(7,556 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Equipment |
|
|
22,477 |
|
|
|
22,060 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
15,046 |
|
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
(6,571 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
48,083 |
|
|
|
38,537 |
|
|
|
9,546 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
430,699 |
|
|
$ |
434,593 |
|
|
$ |
(3,894 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (FTE), at period-end |
|
|
11,319 |
|
|
|
11,341 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
% |
The $3.9 million, or 1%, decrease in total noninterest expense from the prior quarter
reflected:
|
|
|
$7.6 million, or 36%, decline in professional services, reflecting a decline in legal
costs related to collection activities and consulting expenses. |
|
|
|
$6.6 million, or 63%, decline in OREO and foreclosure expense as OREO balances declined
18% in the current quarter. |
|
|
|
$5.4 million, or 23%, decline in deposit and other insurance expense. |
Partially offset by:
|
|
|
$9.5 million, or 25%, increase in other expense. This reflected the current quarters
$17.0 million of expense associated with additions to litigation reserves, partially offset
by the benefit of declines in fraud losses, repurchase losses related to representations
and warranties made on mortgage loans sold, and travel expense. |
|
|
|
$6.8 million, or 3%, increase in personnel costs, primarily reflecting a seasonal $6.9
million increase in FICA and other employment taxes. |
22
Provision for Income Taxes
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 3.)
The provision for income taxes in the 2011 first quarter was $34.7 million. This compared with
a provision for income taxes of $35.0 million in the 2010 fourth quarter and a benefit for income
taxes of $38.1 million in the 2010 first quarter. All three quarters include the benefits from
tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, and general business credits. At March 31, 2011, we
had a net deferred tax asset of $532.6 million. Based on both positive and negative evidence and
our level of forecasted future taxable
income, there was no impairment to the deferred tax asset at March 31, 2011. The total
disallowed deferred tax asset for regulatory capital purposes decreased to $89.9 million at March
31, 2011, from $161.3 million at December 31, 2010.
The IRS completed audits of our consolidated federal income tax returns for tax years through
2007. The IRS, various states, and other jurisdictions remain open to examination, including
Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Illinois. The IRS and the
Commonwealth of Kentucky have proposed adjustments to our previously filed tax returns. We believe
that our tax positions related to such proposed adjustments are correct and supported by applicable
statutes, regulations, and judicial authority, and intend to vigorously defend them. It is
possible the ultimate resolution of the proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to
the results of operations in the period it occurs. However, although no assurance can be given, we
believe the resolution of these examinations will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position.
23
RISK MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL
Risk awareness, identification and assessment, reporting, and active management are key
elements in overall risk management. We manage risk to an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile
strategy through a control framework and by monitoring and responding to potential risks. We
believe that our primary risk exposures are credit, market, liquidity, operational, and compliance
risk. We hold capital proportionately against these risks. More information on risk can be found
in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2010 Form 10-K and subsequent filings with
the SEC. Additionally, the MD&A included in our 2010 Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with
this MD&A as this discussion provides only material updates to the 2010 Form 10-K. Our definition,
philosophy, and approach to risk management have not materially changed from the discussion
presented in the 2010 Form 10-K.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a counterparty is not able to meet the agreed
upon terms of the financial obligation. The majority of our credit risk is associated with lending
activities, as the acceptance and management of credit risk is central to profitable lending. We
also have significant credit risk associated with our available-for-sale and other investment
securities portfolio (see Investment Securities Portfolio discussion). While there is credit risk
associated with derivative activity, we believe this exposure is minimal. The significant change
in the economic conditions and the resulting changes in borrower behavior over the past several
years resulted in our focusing significant resources to the identification, monitoring, and
managing of our credit risk. In addition to the traditional credit risk mitigation strategies of
credit policies and processes, market risk management activities, and portfolio diversification, we
added more quantitative measurement capabilities utilizing external data sources, enhanced use of
modeling technology, and internal stress testing processes. Our portfolio management policies
demonstrate our commitment to maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile. To that end,
we continue to expand resources in our credit risk management area.
Our portfolio has shown steadily improving credit quality trends across the entire loan and
lease portfolio despite the continued weakness in the residential real estate market and the U.S.
economy in general. Although NCOs and delinquencies remain elevated, the improving trend of our
credit metrics is significant and sustained. We believe that early identification of problem loans
and aggressive action plans for these problem loans, combined with high quality new loan
originations, will result in continuing improvement. However, despite the improvement in credit
metrics, additional risks emerged during the 2011 first quarter. These include the continued
instability in the Middle East with its ramifications on the cost of oil, and the crisis in Japan
that could negatively impact the production of consumer goods and services, most notably in the
automobile sector. In the short term, we anticipate the rising price of gasoline will have a
direct affect on the consumer confidence index, and will impact the finances of some of our retail
and commercial borrowers. The pronounced downturn in the residential real estate market that began
in early 2007 has resulted in significantly lower residential real estate values and higher
delinquencies and NCOs, including loans to builders and developers of residential real estate. In
addition, continued high unemployment, among other factors, has slowed any significant recovery. As
a result, we have experienced higher than historical levels of delinquencies and NCOs in our loan
portfolios since 2008. The value of our investment securities backed by residential and
commercial real estate was also negatively impacted by a lack of liquidity in the financial markets
and anticipated credit losses.
Loan and Lease Credit Exposure Mix
At March 31, 2011, our loans and leases totaled $38.2 billion, little changed compared to
$38.1 billion at December 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2011, commercial loans and leases totaled $19.6 billion, and represented 52% of
our total credit exposure. Our commercial portfolio is diversified along product type, size, and
geography within our footprint and is comprised of the following (see Commercial Credit
discussion):
C&I C&I loans and leases are made to commercial customers for use in normal business
operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, or other projects. The majority
of these borrowers are customers doing business within our geographic regions. C&I loans and
leases are generally underwritten individually and secured with the assets of the company and/or
the personal guarantee of the business owners. The financing of owner occupied facilities is
considered a C&I loan even though there is improved real estate as collateral. This treatment is a
function of the credit decision process, which focuses on cash flow from operations of the business
to repay the debt. The operation, sale, rental, or refinancing of the real estate is not
considered the primary repayment source for these types of loans. As we look to grow our C&I
portfolio, we have further developed our ABL capabilities by adding experienced ABL professionals
to take advantage of market opportunities resulting in better leveraging of the manufacturing base
in our primary markets. Also, our Equipment Finance area is targeting larger equipment financings
in the manufacturing sector in addition to our core products. We also added a large corporate
banking group with sufficient resources to ensure we appropriately recognize and manage the risks
associated with these types of lending.
24
CRE CRE loans consist of loans for income-producing real estate properties, real estate
investment trusts, and real estate developers. We mitigate our risk on these loans by requiring
collateral values that exceed the loan amount and underwriting the loan with projected cash flow in
excess of the debt service requirement. These loans are made to finance properties such as
apartment
buildings, office and industrial buildings, and retail shopping centers, and are repaid
through cash flows related to the operation, sale, or refinance of the property.
Construction CRE Construction CRE loans are loans to individuals, companies, or developers
used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be
generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction CRE portfolio
primarily consists of retail, residential (land, single family, and condominiums), office, and
warehouse product types. Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been
presold or preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate
companies with significant equity invested in each project. These loans are underwritten and
managed by a specialized real estate lending group that actively monitors the construction phase
and manages the loan disbursements according to the predetermined construction schedule.
Total consumer loans and leases were $18.6 billion at March 31, 2011, and represented 48% of
our total loan and lease credit exposure. The consumer portfolio was primarily diversified among
home equity loans and lines-of-credit, residential mortgages, and automobile loans and leases (see
Consumer Credit discussion).
Automobile Automobile loans and leases are primarily comprised of loans made through
automotive dealerships and include exposure in selected states outside of our primary banking
markets. No state outside of our primary banking markets represented more than 5% of our total
automobile portfolio at March 31, 2011. Our automobile lease portfolio represents an immaterial
portion of the total portfolio as we exited the automobile leasing business during the 2008 fourth
quarter.
Home equity Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines-of-credit. This
type of lending, which is secured by a first- or second- lien on the borrowers residence, allows
customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Given the current low interest rate
environment, many borrowers have utilized the line-of-credit home equity product as the primary
source of financing their home. As a result, the proportion of the home equity portfolio secured
by a first-lien has increased significantly in our portfolio over the past three years, positively
impacting the portfolios performance. We expect this positive impact to continue in the future.
Real estate market values at the time of origination directly affect the amount of credit extended
and, in the event of default, subsequent changes in these values impact the severity of losses. We
actively manage the extension of credit and the amount of credit extended through a combination of
criteria including debt-to-income policies and LTV policy limits.
Residential mortgage Residential mortgage loans represent loans to consumers for the
purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15- to 30- year
term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. Generally,
our practice is to sell a significant portion of our fixed-rate originations in the secondary
market. As such, the majority of the loans in our portfolio are ARMs. These ARMs primarily
consist of a fixed-rate of interest for the first 3 to 5 years, and then adjust annually. These
loans comprised approximately 56% of our total residential mortgage loan portfolio at March 31,
2011. We are subject to repurchase risk associated with residential mortgage loans sold in the
secondary market. This activity has increased recently reflecting the overall market conditions
and GSE activity and an appropriate level of allowance has been established to address the
repurchase risk inherent in the portfolio.
Other consumer This portfolio primarily consists of consumer loans not secured by real
estate or automobiles, including personal unsecured loans.
25
Table 15 Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
Commercial:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
12,425 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
12,392 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
12,245 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
5,711 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6,001 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6,174 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6,013 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
6,651 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,912 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7,184 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
19,597 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
19,714 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
19,337 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
19,576 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
19,701 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
5,802 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,614 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4,847 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,784 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
7,690 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
7,510 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,614 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
18,649 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
18,393 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
18,164 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
17,394 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
17,231 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
38,246 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
38,107 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
37,501 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
36,970 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
36,932 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There were no commercial loans outstanding that would be considered a concentration of lending to a particular industry or group of industries. |
The table below provides our total loan and lease portfolio segregated by the type of
collateral securing the loan or lease:
Table 16 Loan and Lease Portfolio by Collateral Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
22,231 |
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
$ |
22,603 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
$ |
22,717 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
$ |
22,666 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
$ |
23,238 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
Vehicles |
|
|
7,333 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
7,134 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6,652 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,054 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5,583 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Receivables/Inventory |
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Machinery/Equipment |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Securities/Deposits |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
38,246 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
38,107 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
37,501 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
36,970 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
36,932 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Credit
In commercial lending, on-going credit management is dependent on the type and nature of the
loan. We monitor all significant exposures on an on-going basis. All commercial credit extensions
are assigned internal risk ratings reflecting the borrowers probability-of-default and
loss-given-default (severity of loss). This two-dimensional rating methodology provides granularity
in the portfolio management process. The probability-of-default is rated and applied at the
borrower level. The loss-given-default is rated and applied based on the specific type of credit
extension and the quality and lien position associated with the underlying collateral. The
internal risk ratings are assessed at origination and updated at each periodic monitoring event.
There is also extensive macro portfolio management analysis on an on-going basis. As an example,
the retail properties class of the CRE portfolio and manufacturing loans within the C&I portfolio
have each received more frequent evaluation at the individual loan level given the weak environment
and our portfolio composition. We continually review and adjust our risk-rating criteria based on
actual experience, which provides us with the current risk level in the portfolio and is the basis
for determining an appropriate allowance amount for this portfolio.
26
Our Credit Review group performs testing to provide an independent review and assessment of
the quality and / or risk of new loan originations. This group is part of our Risk Management
area, and conducts portfolio reviews on a risk-based cycle to evaluate individual loans, validate
risk ratings, as well as test the consistency of credit processes. Similarly, to provide
consistent oversight, a centralized portfolio management team monitors and reports on the
performance of small business loans, which are included within the commercial loan portfolio.
All loans categorized as Classified (see Note 3 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements) are managed by our SAD. The SAD is a specialized credit group that handles
the day-to-day management of workouts, commercial recoveries, and problem loan sales. Its
responsibilities include developing action plans, assessing risk ratings, and determining the
adequacy of the allowance, the accrual status, and the ultimate collectability of the Classified
loan portfolio.
Our commercial portfolio is diversified by customer size, as well as geographically throughout
our footprint. No outstanding commercial loans and leases comprised an industry or geographic
concentration of lending. Certain segments of our commercial portfolio are discussed in further
detail below.
C&I PORTFOLIO
We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio through origination policies, concentration
limits, on-going loan level reviews, recourse requirements, and continuous portfolio risk
management activities. Our origination policies for this portfolio include loan product-type
specific policies such as LTV and debt service coverage ratios, as applicable.
While C&I borrowers have been challenged by the weak economy, quarterly levels of newly
identified problem loans have declined, reflecting a combination of proactive risk identification
as well as some relative improvement in the economic conditions. Nevertheless, some borrowers may
no longer have sufficient capital to withstand the extended stress. As a result, these borrowers
may not be able to comply with the original terms of their credit agreements. We continue to focus
attention on the portfolio management process to proactively identify borrowers that may be facing
financial difficulty and to assess all potential solutions. The impact of the economic environment
is further evidenced by the level of line-of-credit activity, as borrowers continued to maintain
relatively low utilization percentages.
As shown in the following table, C&I loans and leases totaled $13.3 billion at March 31, 2011:
Table 17 Commercial and Industrial Loans and Leases by Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
Loans Outstanding |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Class: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
4,288 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
$ |
3,861 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Other commercial and industrial |
|
|
15,244 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,532 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference in the composition between the commitments and loans and leases
outstanding in the other commercial and industrial class results from a significant amount of
working capital lines-of-credit and businesses have reduced these borrowings. The funding
percentage associated with the lines-of-credit has been a significant indicator of credit quality.
Generally, borrowers that fully utilize their line-of-credit consistently, over time, have a higher
risk profile. This represents one of many credit risk factors we utilize in assessing the credit
risk portfolio of individual borrowers and the overall portfolio.
CRE PORTFOLIO
We manage the risks inherent in this portfolio specific to CRE lending, focusing on the
quality of the developer, and the specifics associated with each project. Generally, we: (1) limit
our loans to 80% of the appraised value of the commercial real estate, (2) require net operating
cash flows to be 125% of required interest and principal payments, and (3) if the commercial real
estate is nonowner occupied, require that at least 50% of the space of the project be preleased.
Each CRE loan is classified as either core or noncore. We separated the CRE portfolio into
these categories in order to provide more clarity around our portfolio management strategies and to
provide an additional level of transparency. We believe segregating the noncore CRE from core CRE
improves our ability to understand the nature, performance prospects, and problem resolution
opportunities, thus allowing us to continue to deal proactively with any emerging credit issues.
27
A CRE loan is generally considered core when the borrower is an experienced, well-capitalized
developer in our Midwest footprint, and has either an established meaningful relationship with us
that generates an acceptable return on capital or demonstrates the prospect of becoming one. The
core CRE portfolio was $3.9 billion at March 31, 2011, representing 62% of total CRE loans. The
performance of the core portfolio met our expectations based on the consistency of the asset
quality metrics within the portfolio.
Based on our extensive project level assessment process, including forward-looking collateral
valuations, we continue to believe the credit quality of the core portfolio is stable.
A CRE loan is generally considered noncore based on the lack of a substantive relationship
outside of the loan product, with no immediate prospects for meeting the core relationship
criteria. The noncore CRE portfolio declined from $2.6 billion at December 31, 2010, to $2.4
billion at March 31, 2011, and represented 38% of total CRE loans. Of the loans in the noncore
portfolio at March 31, 2011, 53% were categorized as Pass, 95% had guarantors, 99% were secured,
and 92% were located within our geographic footprint. However, it is within the noncore portfolio
where most of the credit quality challenges exist. For example, $0.3 billion, or 12%, of related
outstanding balances, are classified as NALs. SAD administered $1.2 billion, or 52%, of total
noncore CRE loans at March 31, 2011. We expect to exit the majority of noncore CRE relationships
over time through normal repayments and refinancings, possible sales should economically attractive
opportunities arise, or the reclassification to a core CRE relationship if it expands to meet the
core criteria.
The table below provides a segregation of the CRE portfolio as of March 31, 2011:
Table 18 Core Commercial Real Estate Loans by Property Type and Property Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Ohio |
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
Kentucky |
|
|
Florida |
|
|
Virginia |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
344 |
|
|
$ |
1,112 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Office |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core portfolio |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Total noncore portfolio |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,346 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Credit quality data regarding the ACL and NALs, segregated by core CRE loans and noncore
CRE loans, is presented in the following table:
Table 19 Commercial Real Estate Core vs. Noncore Portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Prior NCOs |
|
|
ACL $ |
|
|
ACL % |
|
|
Credit Mark (1) |
|
|
Loans |
|
Total core |
|
$ |
3,911 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncore SAD (2) |
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
22.82 |
|
|
|
39.83 |
|
|
|
239.3 |
|
Noncore Other |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
8.35 |
|
|
|
9.46 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncore |
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
15.92 |
|
|
|
27.12 |
|
|
|
275.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
|
8.26 |
% |
|
|
13.46 |
% |
|
$ |
305.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Total core |
|
$ |
4,042 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
|
3.96 |
% |
|
|
4.08 |
% |
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncore SAD (2) |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
23.50 |
|
|
|
39.80 |
|
|
|
307.2 |
|
Noncore Other |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
9.06 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncore |
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
16.63 |
|
|
|
27.33 |
|
|
|
348.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
6,651 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
|
8.93 |
% |
|
|
13.96 |
% |
|
$ |
363.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as (Prior NCOs + ACL $) / (Ending Balance + Prior NCOs). |
|
(2) |
|
Noncore loans managed by SAD, the area responsible for managing loans and relationships designated as Classified Loans. |
As shown in the above table, the ending balance of the CRE portfolio at March 31, 2011,
declined $0.4 billion, or 5%, compared with December 31, 2010. Of this decline, 63% occurred in
the noncore segment of the portfolio and was a result of payoffs and NCOs
as we actively focus on the noncore portfolio to reduce our overall CRE exposure. This
reduction demonstrates our continued commitment to maintaining an aggregate moderate-to-low risk
profile. We anticipate further noncore CRE declines in future periods based on our strategy to
reduce our overall CRE exposure. The reduction in the core segment is a result of limited
origination activity reflecting our strategy to reduce our overall CRE exposure. We will continue
to support our core developer customers as appropriate, however, we do not believe that significant
additional CRE activity is appropriate given our current exposure in CRE lending and the current
economic conditions.
Also as shown above, substantial reserves for the noncore portfolio have been established. At
March 31, 2011, the ACL related to the noncore portfolio was 15.92%. The combination of the
existing ACL and prior NCOs represents the total credit actions taken on each segment of the
portfolio. From this data, we calculate a credit mark that provides a consistent measurement of
the cumulative credit actions taken against a specific portfolio segment. We believe the combined
credit activity is appropriate for each of the CRE segments.
Retail Properties
Our portfolio of CRE loans secured by retail properties totaled $1.7 billion, or approximately
4% of total loans and leases, at March 31, 2011. Loans within this portfolio segment declined $0.1
billion, or 4%, from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2010. Credit approval in this portfolio segment
is generally dependent on preleasing requirements, and net operating income from the project must
cover debt service by specified percentages when the loan is fully funded.
The weakness of the economic environment in our geographic regions continued to impact the
projects that secure the loans in this portfolio class. Lower occupancy rates, reduced rental
rates, and the expectation these levels will remain stressed for the foreseeable future may
adversely affect some of our borrowers ability to repay these loans. We have increased the level
of credit risk management activity on this portfolio segment, and we analyze our retail property
loans in detail by combining property type, geographic location, and other data, to assess and
manage our credit risks. We review the majority of this portfolio segment on a monthly basis.
Consumer Credit
Consumer credit approvals are based on, among other factors, the financial strength and
payment history of the borrower, type of exposure, and the transaction structure. We make
extensive use of portfolio assessment models to continuously monitor the quality of the portfolio,
which may result in changes to future origination strategies. The on-going analysis and review
process results in a determination of an appropriate allowance for our consumer loan and lease
portfolio.
29
AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO
Our strategy in the automobile portfolio continued to focus on high quality borrowers as
measured by both FICO and internal custom scores, combined with appropriate LTVs, terms, and a
reasonable level of profitability. We discontinued automobile leasing in 2008 with the portfolio
in run-off mode thereafter. Our strategy and operational capabilities allow us to appropriately
manage the origination quality across the entire portfolio, including our newer markets. Although
increased origination volume and the expansion into new markets can be associated with increased
risk levels, we believe our strategy and operational capabilities significantly mitigate these
risks.
We have continued to consistently execute our value proposition while taking advantage of
market opportunities that allow us to grow our automobile loan portfolio. The significant growth
in the portfolio over the past two years was accomplished while maintaining our consistently high
credit quality metrics. As we further execute our strategies and take advantage of these
opportunities, we are developing alternative plans to address any growth in excess of our
established portfolio concentration limits, including both securitizations and loan sales.
RESIDENTIAL-SECURED PORTFOLIOS
The residential mortgage and home equity portfolios are primarily located within our
footprint. The continued stress on home prices has caused the performance in these portfolios to
remain weaker than historical levels. We continue to evaluate all of our policies and processes
associated with managing these portfolios to provide as much clarity as possible. In the 2011
first quarter, we implemented a more conservative position regarding NCOs in our residential
mortgage portfolio by accelerating the timing of charge-off recognition. In addition, we
established an immediate charge-off process regardless of the delinquency status for short sale
situations. Both of these policy changes resulted in accelerated recognition of charge-offs
totaling $6.8 million in the 2011 first quarter. These changes in our charge-off policies do not
impact our commitment to providing assistance to our borrowers through our Home Savers Group. Our
charge-off policies for the home equity portfolio remain unchanged.
Table 20 Selected Home Equity and Residential Mortgage
Portfolio Data
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Residential Mortgage |
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
03/31/11 |
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
|
03/31/11 |
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
|
03/31/11 |
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
3,194 |
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
4,590 |
|
|
$ |
4,672 |
|
|
$ |
4,517 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
Portfolio weighted average LTV
ratio(1) |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Portfolio weighted average FICO
score(2) |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Residential Mortgage (3) |
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Originations |
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
Origination weighted average LTV
ratio(1) |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
Origination weighted average FICO
score(2) |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The LTV ratios for home equity loans and home equity lines-of-credit are cumulative and reflect the balance of any senior loans.
LTV ratios reflect collateral values at the time of loan origination. |
|
(2) |
|
Portfolio weighted average FICO scores reflect currently updated customer credit scores whereas origination weighted average FICO
scores reflect the customer credit scores at the time of loan origination. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents only owned-portfolio originations. |
Home Equity Portfolio
Our home equity portfolio (loans and lines-of-credit) consists of both first-lien and
second-lien mortgage loans with underwriting criteria based on minimum credit scores,
debt-to-income ratios, and LTV ratios. We offer closed-end home equity loans which are generally
fixed-rate with principal and interest payments, and variable-rate interest-only home equity
lines-of-credit which do not require payment of principal during the 10-year revolving period of
the line-of-credit.
30
At March 31, 2011, approximately 41% of our home equity portfolio was secured by first-lien
mortgages. The credit risk profile is substantially reduced when we hold a first-lien position.
During the 2011 first quarter, more than 65% of our home equity portfolio originations were secured
by a first-lien mortgage. We focus on high quality borrowers primarily located within our
footprint. The majority of our home equity line-of-credit borrowers consistently pay more than the
required interest-only amount. Additionally, since we focus on developing complete relationships
with our customers, many of our home equity borrowers are utilizing other products and services.
We believe we have underwritten credit conservatively within this portfolio. We have not
originated home equity loans or lines-of-credit with an LTV at origination greater than 100%,
except for infrequent situations with high quality borrowers. However, continued declines in
housing prices have likely decreased the value of the collateral for this portfolio and it is
likely some loans with an original LTV ratio of less than 100% currently have an LTV ratio greater
than 100%.
For certain home equity loans and lines-of-credit, we may utilize an AVM or other model-driven
value estimate during the credit underwriting process. We utilize a series of credit parameters to
determine the appropriate valuation methodology. While we believe an AVM estimate is an
appropriate valuation source for a portion of our home equity lending activities, we continue to
re-evaluate all of our policies on an on-going basis, specifically related to recent FFIEC
guidelines regarding property valuation. The intent of these guidelines is to ensure complete
independence in the requesting and review of real estate valuations associated with loan decisions.
We are committed to appropriate valuations for all of our real estate lending, and do not
anticipate significant impacts to our loan decision process as a result of these guidelines. We
update values as appropriate, and in compliance with applicable regulations, for loans identified
as higher risk. Loans are identified as higher risk based on performance indicators and the
updated values are utilized to facilitate our portfolio management, as well as our workout and loss
mitigation functions.
We continue to make origination policy adjustments based on our assessment of an appropriate
risk profile, as well as industry actions. In addition to origination policy adjustments, we take
actions, as necessary, to manage the risk profile of this portfolio.
Residential Mortgage Portfolio
We focus on higher quality borrowers and underwrite all applications centrally, often through
the use of an automated underwriting system. We do not originate residential mortgages that allow
negative amortization or allow the borrower multiple payment options.
All residential mortgages are originated based on a completed full appraisal during the credit
underwriting process. We update values on a regular basis in compliance with applicable
regulations to facilitate our portfolio management, as well as our workout and loss mitigation
functions.
Several government actions were enacted that impacted the residential mortgage portfolio,
including various refinance programs which positively affected the availability of credit for the
industry. We are utilizing these programs to enhance our existing strategy of working closely with
our customers.
Credit Quality
We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit quality performance is through an
analysis of credit quality performance ratios. This approach forms the basis of most of the
discussion in the sections immediately following: NPAs and NALs, TDRs, ACL, and NCOs. In addition,
we utilize delinquency rates, risk distribution and migration patterns, and product segmentation in
the analysis of our credit quality performance.
Credit quality performance in the 2011 first quarter reflected continued improvement in the
commercial loan portfolio relating to NCO activity, as well as some improvement in the consumer
portfolio relating to delinquency trends and NCO activity in certain segments excluding any policy
change impacts (see Consumer Credit section). Key credit quality metrics also showed improvement,
including an 18% decline in NPAs and a 13% decline in the level of Criticized commercial loans
compared to the prior quarter. New NPA inflows also declined and delinquency trends continued to
improve compared to the prior quarter.
Our ACL declined $115.7 million to $1,175.4 million, or 3.07% of period-end loans and leases
at March 31, 2011, from $1,291.1 million, or 3.39% at December 31, 2010. Importantly, our ACL as a
percent of period-end NALs increased to 185% from 166%, and the coverage ratio associated with NPAs
also increased. These improved coverage ratios indicated a strengthening of our allowance position
relative to troubled assets from the prior year-end. These coverage ratios are a key component of
our internal adequacy assessment process and provide an important consideration in the
determination of the adequacy of the ACL.
31
NPAs, NALs, AND TDRs
NPAs and NALs
NPAs consist of (1) NALs, which represent loans and leases no longer accruing interest, (2)
impaired loans held for sale, (3) OREO properties, and (4) other NPAs. A C&I or CRE loan is
generally placed on nonaccrual status no later than 90-days past due. With the exception of
residential mortgage loans guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue
interest, residential mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status no later than 180-days past
due. A home equity loan is placed on nonaccrual status no later than 180-days past due.
Automobile and other consumer loans are not placed on nonaccrual status, but are charged-off when
the loan is 120-days past due. Any loan in our portfolio may be placed on nonaccrual status prior
to the policies described above when collection of principal or interest is in doubt. When
interest accruals are suspended, accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals
charged to earnings and prior year amounts generally charged-off as a credit loss. When, in our
judgment, the borrowers ability to make required interest and principal payments has resumed and
collectability is no longer in doubt, the loan or lease is returned to accrual status.
32
The following table reflects period-end NALs and NPAs detail for each of the last five
quarters:
Table 21 Nonaccrual Loans and Leases and Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
260,397 |
|
|
$ |
346,720 |
|
|
$ |
398,353 |
|
|
$ |
429,561 |
|
|
$ |
511,588 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
305,793 |
|
|
|
363,692 |
|
|
|
478,754 |
|
|
|
663,103 |
|
|
|
826,781 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
44,812 |
|
|
|
45,010 |
|
|
|
82,984 |
|
|
|
86,486 |
|
|
|
372,950 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
25,255 |
|
|
|
22,526 |
|
|
|
21,689 |
|
|
|
22,199 |
|
|
|
54,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans and leases |
|
|
636,257 |
|
|
|
777,948 |
|
|
|
981,780 |
|
|
|
1,201,349 |
|
|
|
1,766,108 |
|
Other real estate owned, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
28,668 |
|
|
|
31,649 |
|
|
|
65,775 |
|
|
|
71,937 |
|
|
|
68,289 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
25,961 |
|
|
|
35,155 |
|
|
|
57,309 |
|
|
|
67,189 |
|
|
|
83,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate owned, net |
|
|
54,629 |
|
|
|
66,804 |
|
|
|
123,084 |
|
|
|
139,126 |
|
|
|
152,260 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
690,886 |
|
|
$ |
844,752 |
|
|
$ |
1,104,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,582,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,918,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans as a % of total loans and leases |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
Nonperforming assets ratio(2) |
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming Franklin assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
297,967 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
OREO |
|
|
5,971 |
|
|
|
9,477 |
|
|
|
15,330 |
|
|
|
24,515 |
|
|
|
24,423 |
|
Impaired loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming Franklin assets |
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
9,477 |
|
|
$ |
15,330 |
|
|
$ |
266,742 |
|
|
$ |
353,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The June 30, 2010, figure represents NALs associated with the transfer of Franklin-related residential mortgage and home equity loans to loans held for sale. Loans held for sale are carried at the
lower of cost or fair value less costs to sell. |
|
(2) |
|
This ratio is calculated as NPAs divided by the sum of loans and leases, impaired loans held for sale, and net other real estate. |
The $153.9 million decline in NPAs primarily reflected:
|
|
|
$86.3 million, or 25%, decline in C&I NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem
credit resolutions, including payoffs. The decline was associated with loans throughout
our footprint, with no specific geographic concentration. From an industry perspective,
improvement in the manufacturing-related segment accounted for a significant portion of the
decrease. |
|
|
|
$57.9 million, or 16%, decline in CRE NALs, reflecting both NCO activity and problem
credit resolutions, including borrower payments and payoffs. This decline was a direct
result of our on-going proactive management of these credits by our SAD. Also key to the
decline was the significantly lower level of inflows. The level of inflows, or migration,
is an important indicator of the future trend for the portfolio. |
|
|
|
$12.2 million, or 18%, decline in OREO, primarily reflecting continued declines in both
the commercial and residential segments. Of this decline, only $3.0 million was in the
residential segment as the selling of residential properties remains challenging in our
markets. |
As part of our loss mitigation process, we reunderwrite, modify, or restructure loans when
borrowers are experiencing payment difficulties, based on the borrowers ability to repay the loan.
33
NPA activity for each of the past five quarters was as follows:
Table 22 Nonperforming Asset Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets, beginning of period |
|
$ |
844,752 |
|
|
$ |
1,104,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,582,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,918,368 |
|
|
$ |
2,058,091 |
|
New nonperforming assets |
|
|
192,044 |
|
|
|
237,802 |
|
|
|
278,388 |
|
|
|
171,595 |
|
|
|
237,914 |
|
Franklin-related impact, net |
|
|
(3,506 |
) |
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
|
|
(251,412 |
) |
|
|
(86,715 |
) |
|
|
14,957 |
|
Returns to accruing status |
|
|
(70,886 |
) |
|
|
(100,051 |
) |
|
|
(111,168 |
) |
|
|
(78,739 |
) |
|
|
(80,840 |
) |
Loan and lease losses |
|
|
(128,730 |
) |
|
|
(126,047 |
) |
|
|
(151,013 |
) |
|
|
(173,159 |
) |
|
|
(185,387 |
) |
Other real estate owned gains (losses) |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
(5,117 |
) |
|
|
(5,302 |
) |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
(4,160 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(87,041 |
) |
|
|
(191,296 |
) |
|
|
(210,612 |
) |
|
|
(140,881 |
) |
|
|
(107,640 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
(57,239 |
) |
|
|
(69,550 |
) |
|
|
(26,719 |
) |
|
|
(30,250 |
) |
|
|
(14,567 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets, end of period |
|
$ |
690,886 |
|
|
$ |
844,752 |
|
|
$ |
1,104,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,582,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,918,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Table 23 Accruing Past Due Loans and Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
Residential mortgage (excluding loans guaranteed
by the U.S. government) |
|
|
41,858 |
|
|
|
53,983 |
|
|
|
56,803 |
|
|
|
47,036 |
|
|
|
72,702 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
24,130 |
|
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
27,160 |
|
|
|
26,797 |
|
|
|
29,438 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
7,578 |
|
|
|
10,177 |
|
|
|
11,423 |
|
|
|
9,533 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, excl. loans guaranteed by the U.S. government |
|
|
73,566 |
|
|
|
87,657 |
|
|
|
95,386 |
|
|
|
83,366 |
|
|
|
113,213 |
|
Add: loans guaranteed by the U.S. government |
|
|
94,440 |
|
|
|
98,288 |
|
|
|
94,249 |
|
|
|
95,421 |
|
|
|
96,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans and leases past due 90 days
or more, including loans guaranteed by the U.S.
government |
|
$ |
168,006 |
|
|
$ |
185,945 |
|
|
$ |
189,635 |
|
|
$ |
178,787 |
|
|
$ |
210,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding loans guaranteed by the U.S. government,
as a percent of total loans and leases |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed by the U.S. government, as a percent of
total loans and leases |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including loans guaranteed by the U.S. government,
as a percent of total loans and leases |
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ratios are calculated as a percentage of related loans and leases. |
TDR Loans
TDRs are modified loans in which a concession is provided to a borrower experiencing financial
difficulties. Loan modifications are considered TDRs when the concessions provided are not
available to the borrower through either normal channels or other sources. However, not all loan
modifications are TDRs. Our standards relating to loan modifications consider, among other
factors, minimum verified income requirements, cash flow analysis, and collateral valuations.
However, each potential loan modification is reviewed individually and the terms of the loan are
modified to meet a borrowers specific circumstances at a point in time. All loan modifications,
including those classified as TDRs, are reviewed and approved. Our ALLL is largely driven by
updated risk ratings assigned to commercial loans, updated borrower credit scores on consumer
loans, and borrower delinquency history in both the commercial and consumer portfolios. As such,
the provision for credit losses is impacted primarily by changes in borrower payment performance
rather than the TDR classification. TDRs can be classified as either accrual or nonaccrual loans.
Nonaccrual TDRs are included in NALs whereas accruing TDRs are excluded because the borrower
remains contractually current.
In the workout of a problem loan, many factors are considered when determining the most
favorable resolution. For consumer loans, we evaluate the ability and willingness of the borrower
to make contractual or reduced payments, the value of the underlying collateral, and the costs
associated with the foreclosure or repossession, and remarketing of the collateral. For commercial
loans, we consider similar criteria and also evaluate the borrowers business prospects.
35
Residential Mortgage loan TDRs Residential mortgage TDRs represent loan
modifications associated with traditional first-lien mortgage loans in which a
concession has been provided to the borrower. Residential mortgages identified as
TDRs involve borrowers who are unable to refinance their mortgages through our
normal mortgage origination channels or through other independent sources. Some,
but not all, of the loans may be delinquent. Modifications can include adjustments
to rates and/or principal. Modified loans identified as TDRs are aggregated into
pools for analysis. Cash flows and weighted average interest rates are used to
calculate impairment at the pooled-loan level. Once the loans are aggregated into
the pool, they continue to be classified as TDRs until contractually repaid or
charged-off. No consideration is given to removing individual loans from the pools.
Residential mortgage loans not guaranteed by a U.S. government agency such as the
FHA, VA, and the USDA, including restructured loans, are reported as accrual or
nonaccrual based upon delinquency status. NALs are those that are greater than
180-days contractually past due. Loans guaranteed by U.S. government organizations
continue to accrue interest upon delinquency.
Residential mortgage loan TDR classifications resulted in an impairment adjustment
of $2.0 million during the 2011 first quarter. Prior to the TDR classification,
residential mortgage loans individually had minimal ALLL associated with them
because the ALLL is calculated on a total pooled-portfolio basis.
Other Consumer loan TDRs Generally, these are TDRs associated with home
equity borrowings and automobile loans. We make similar interest rate, term, and
principal concessions as with residential mortgage loan TDRs. The TDR
classification for these other consumer loans resulted in an impairment adjustment
of $0.6 million during the 2011 first quarter.
Commercial loan TDRs Commercial accruing TDRs represent loans rated as
Classified and are no more than 90-days past due on contractual principal and
interest, but undergo a modification. Accruing TDRs often result from loans rated
as Classified receiving an extension on the maturity of their loan, for example, to
allow additional time for the sale or lease of underlying CRE collateral. Often, it
is prudent to extend the maturity rather than foreclose on a commercial loan,
particularly for borrowers who are generating cash flows to support contractual
interest payments. These borrowers cannot obtain a loan with similar terms through
other independent sources because of their current financial circumstances.
Therefore, a concession is provided and the modification is classified as a TDR.
The TDR remains in accruing status as long as the customer is current on payments
and no loss is probable.
Commercial nonaccrual TDRs result from either: (1) an accruing commercial TDR being placed on
nonaccrual status (at March 31, 2011, approximately $12.8 million of our commercial
nonaccrual TDRs represented this situation); or (2) a workout where an existing commercial
NAL is restructured and a concession is given. The majority of these workouts restructure
the NAL so that two or more new notes are created. The senior note is underwritten based
upon our normal underwriting standards at current market rates and is sized so projected cash
flows are sufficient to repay contractual principal and interest. The terms on the
subordinate note(s) vary by situation, but often defer interest payments until after the
senior note is repaid. Creating two or more notes often allows the borrower to continue a
project or weather a temporary economic downturn and allows us to right-size a loan based
upon the current expectations for a projects performance. The senior note is considered for
return to accrual status if the borrower has sustained sufficient cash flows for a six-month
period of time and we believe no loss is probable. This six-month period could extend before
or after the restructure date. Subordinated notes created in the workout are charged-off
immediately. Any interest or principal payments received on the subordinated notes are
applied to the principal of the senior note first until the senior note is repaid. Further
payments are recorded as recoveries on the subordinated note. At March 31, 2011,
approximately $25.0 million of our commercial nonaccrual TDRs resulted from such workouts.
As the loans are already considered Classified, an adequate ALLL has been recorded when
appropriate. Consequently, a TDR classification on commercial loans does not usually result
in significant additional reserves. We consider removing the TDR status on commercial loans
if the loan is at a market rate of interest and after the loan has performed in accordance
with the restructured terms for a sustained period of time, generally one year.
36
The table below provides a summary of our accruing and nonaccruing TDRs by loan type for each
of the past five quarters:
Table 24 Accruing and Nonaccruing Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Troubled debt restructured loans accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
333,492 |
|
|
$ |
328,411 |
|
|
$ |
304,356 |
|
|
$ |
281,473 |
|
|
$ |
253,135 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
78,488 |
|
|
|
76,586 |
|
|
|
73,210 |
|
|
|
65,061 |
|
|
|
62,148 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
206,462 |
|
|
|
222,632 |
|
|
|
157,971 |
|
|
|
141,353 |
|
|
|
117,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
troubled debt restructured loans accruing |
|
|
618,442 |
|
|
|
627,629 |
|
|
|
535,537 |
|
|
|
487,887 |
|
|
|
432,950 |
|
Troubled debt restructured loans nonaccruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
8,523 |
|
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
10,581 |
|
|
|
11,337 |
|
|
|
9,415 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
37,858 |
|
|
|
33,462 |
|
|
|
33,236 |
|
|
|
90,266 |
|
|
|
122,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
troubled debt restructured loans nonaccruing |
|
|
46,395 |
|
|
|
39,251 |
|
|
|
43,817 |
|
|
|
101,603 |
|
|
|
132,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total troubled debt restructured loans |
|
$ |
664,837 |
|
|
$ |
666,880 |
|
|
$ |
579,354 |
|
|
$ |
589,490 |
|
|
$ |
565,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL
(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.)
We maintain two reserves, both of which in our judgment are adequate to absorb credit losses
inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise
the total ACL. Our Credit Administration group is responsible for developing the methodology
assumptions and estimates used in the calculation, as well as determining the adequacy of the ACL.
The ALLL represents the estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the reported date.
Additions to the ALLL result from recording provision expense for loan losses or increased risk
levels resulting from loan risk-rating downgrades, while reductions reflect charge-offs,
recoveries, decreased risk levels resulting from loan risk-rating upgrades, or the sale of loans.
The AULC is determined by applying the transaction reserve process to the unfunded portion of the
loan exposures adjusted by an applicable funding expectation.
A provision for credit losses is recorded to adjust the ACL to the level we have determined to
be adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio. The provision for
credit losses in the 2011 first quarter was $49.4 million, compared with $87.0 million in the prior
quarter and $235.0 million in the year-ago quarter. The decline in provision expense reflects a
combination of lower NCOs and the reduction of Criticized loans throughout the entire loan and
lease portfolio.
We regularly assess the adequacy of the ACL by performing on-going evaluations of the loan and
lease portfolio, including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan
category, the financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value
of any collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented
support. We evaluate the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic conditions on
the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our exposure to
credit losses and assessing the adequacy of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition to general
economic conditions and the other factors described above, we also consider the impact of declining
residential real estate values and the diversification of CRE loans, particularly loans secured by
retail properties.
Our ACL assessment process includes the on-going assessment of credit quality metrics, and a
comparison of certain ACL adequacy benchmarks to current performance. While the total ACL balance
has declined in recent quarters, all of the relevant benchmarks improved as a result of the asset
quality improvement. The coverage ratios of NALs, Criticized, and Classified loans have
significantly improved in recent quarters despite the decline in the ACL level.
37
The table below reflects activity in the ALLL and the AULC for each of the last five quarters:
Table 25 Quarterly Allowance for Credit Losses Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses,
beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,249,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,402,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,477,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,482,479 |
|
Loan and lease losses |
|
|
(199,007 |
) |
|
|
(205,587 |
) |
|
|
(221,144 |
) |
|
|
(312,954 |
) |
|
|
(264,222 |
) |
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
|
|
33,924 |
|
|
|
33,336 |
|
|
|
36,630 |
|
|
|
33,726 |
|
|
|
25,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan and lease losses |
|
|
(165,083 |
) |
|
|
(172,251 |
) |
|
|
(184,514 |
) |
|
|
(279,228 |
) |
|
|
(238,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
49,301 |
|
|
|
84,907 |
|
|
|
118,788 |
|
|
|
203,633 |
|
|
|
233,971 |
|
Allowance for assets sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period |
|
$ |
1,133,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,249,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,352 |
|
|
$ |
1,402,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,477,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit, beginning of period |
|
$ |
42,127 |
|
|
$ |
40,061 |
|
|
$ |
39,689 |
|
|
$ |
49,916 |
|
|
$ |
48,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (reduction in) unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit losses |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(10,227 |
) |
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments
and letters of credit, end of period |
|
$ |
42,211 |
|
|
$ |
42,127 |
|
|
$ |
40,061 |
|
|
$ |
39,689 |
|
|
$ |
49,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses, end of period |
|
$ |
1,175,437 |
|
|
$ |
1,291,135 |
|
|
$ |
1,376,413 |
|
|
$ |
1,441,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,527,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses as % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
2.96 |
% |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans and leases |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Nonperforming assets |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses as % of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
4.14 |
% |
Nonaccrual loans and leases |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Nonperforming assets |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
The reduction in the ACL, compared with December 31, 2010, reflected a decline in the
commercial portfolio ALLL as a result of NCOs on loans with specific reserves, and an overall
reduction in the level of commercial Criticized loans. Commercial Criticized loans are commercial
loans rated as OLEM, Substandard, Doubtful, or Loss. As shown in the table below, commercial
Criticized loans declined $0.4 billion from December 31, 2010, reflecting significant upgrade and
payment activity.
Table 26 Criticized Commercial Loan Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criticized commercial loans, beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,074,481 |
|
|
$ |
3,637,533 |
|
|
$ |
4,106,602 |
|
|
$ |
4,608,610 |
|
|
$ |
4,971,637 |
|
New additions / increases |
|
|
169,884 |
|
|
|
289,850 |
|
|
|
407,514 |
|
|
|
280,353 |
|
|
|
306,499 |
|
Advances |
|
|
61,516 |
|
|
|
52,282 |
|
|
|
75,386 |
|
|
|
79,392 |
|
|
|
91,450 |
|
Upgrades to Pass |
|
|
(238,518 |
) |
|
|
(382,713 |
) |
|
|
(391,316 |
) |
|
|
(409,092 |
) |
|
|
(273,011 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(294,564 |
) |
|
|
(401,302 |
) |
|
|
(408,698 |
) |
|
|
(331,145 |
) |
|
|
(324,229 |
) |
Loan losses |
|
|
(112,008 |
) |
|
|
(121,169 |
) |
|
|
(151,955 |
) |
|
|
(121,516 |
) |
|
|
(163,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criticized commercial loans, end of period |
|
$ |
2,660,792 |
|
|
$ |
3,074,481 |
|
|
$ |
3,637,533 |
|
|
$ |
4,106,602 |
|
|
$ |
4,608,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compared with December 31, 2010, the AULC was little changed.
The ACL coverage ratio associated with NALs was 185% at March 31, 2011, representing a
continued improvement compared with recent prior periods. This improvement reflected substantial
payments on C&I and CRE NALs.
Although credit quality asset metrics and trends, including those mentioned above, continued
to improve in the 2011 first quarter, the economic environment in our markets remained weak and
uncertain as reflected by continued weak residential values, continued weakness in industrial
employment in northern Ohio and southeast Michigan, and the significant subjectivity involved in
commercial real estate valuations for properties located in areas with limited sale or refinance
activities. Residential real estate values continued to be negatively impacted by high
unemployment, increased foreclosure activity, and the elimination of home-buyer tax credits. In
the near-term, we believe these factors will result in continued stress in our portfolios secured
by residential real estate and an elevated level of NCOs compared to historic levels. Further,
concerns continue to exist regarding conditions in both national and international markets (for
example, the political turmoil in the Middle East and the natural disasters in Japan), the
conditions of both the financial and credit markets, the unemployment rate, the impact of the
Federal Reserve monetary policy, and continued uncertainty regarding federal, state, and local
government budget deficits. We do not anticipate any meaningful change in the overall economy in
the near-term. All of these factors are impacting consumer confidence, as well as business
investments and acquisitions. Given the combination of these noted factors, we believe that our
ACL coverage levels are reflective of the quality of our portfolio and the operating environment.
38
The table below reflects the allocation of our ACL among our various loan categories during
each of the past five quarters:
Table 27 Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
industrial |
|
$ |
299,564 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
340,614 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
353,431 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
426,767 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
459,011 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Commercial real
estate |
|
|
511,068 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
588,251 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
654,219 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
695,778 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
741,669 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
810,632 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
928,865 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
1,007,650 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,122,545 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
1,200,680 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
50,862 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
49,488 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
44,505 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
41,762 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
56,111 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
149,370 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
150,630 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
154,323 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
117,708 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
127,970 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
96,741 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
93,289 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
93,407 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
79,105 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
60,295 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
25,621 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
26,736 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
36,467 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
41,040 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
32,913 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
322,594 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
320,143 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
328,702 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
279,615 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
277,289 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan and lease
losses |
|
|
1,133,226 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,249,008 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,336,352 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,402,160 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,477,969 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan
commitments |
|
|
42,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
1,175,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,291,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,376,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,441,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,527,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Percentages represent the percentage of each loan and lease category to total loans and leases. |
NCOs
C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to fair value at 90-days past due.
Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. Home equity loans
are charged-off to fair value at 120-days past due. Residential mortgages are charged-off to fair
value at 150-days past due. Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies
described above if a loss confirming event has occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are
not limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset
valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment.
39
Table 28
reflects NCO detail for each of the last five quarters. Table 29 displays the NCO
Franklin-related impacts for each of the last five quarters.
Table 28
Quarterly Net Charge-off Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Net charge-offs by loan and lease type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
42,191 |
|
|
$ |
59,124 |
|
|
$ |
62,241 |
|
|
$ |
58,128 |
|
|
$ |
75,439 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
28,400 |
|
|
|
11,084 |
|
|
|
17,936 |
|
|
|
45,562 |
|
|
|
34,426 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
39,283 |
|
|
|
33,787 |
|
|
|
45,725 |
|
|
|
36,169 |
|
|
|
50,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
67,683 |
|
|
|
44,871 |
|
|
|
63,661 |
|
|
|
81,731 |
|
|
|
85,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
109,874 |
|
|
|
103,995 |
|
|
|
125,902 |
|
|
|
139,859 |
|
|
|
160,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
8,531 |
|
Home equity(1) |
|
|
26,715 |
|
|
|
29,175 |
|
|
|
27,827 |
|
|
|
44,470 |
|
|
|
37,901 |
|
Residential mortgage(2), (3) |
|
|
18,932 |
|
|
|
26,775 |
|
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
82,848 |
|
|
|
24,311 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
|
6,254 |
|
|
|
6,615 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
55,209 |
|
|
|
68,256 |
|
|
|
58,612 |
|
|
|
139,369 |
|
|
|
77,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
165,083 |
|
|
$ |
172,251 |
|
|
$ |
184,514 |
|
|
$ |
279,228 |
|
|
$ |
238,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs annualized percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
18.59 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
9.77 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
Home equity(1) |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
Residential mortgage(2), (3) |
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
7.19 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2010 second quarter included net charge-offs totaling $14,678 thousand associated with the transfer of Franklin-related home equity loans to loans held for sale and $1,262 thousand of other
Franklin-related net charge-offs. |
|
(2) |
|
The 2010 second quarter included net charge-offs totaling $60,822 thousand associated with the transfer of Franklin-related residential mortgage loans to loans held for sale and $3,403 thousand of
other Franklin-related net charge-offs. |
|
(3) |
|
The 2010 fourth quarter included net charge-offs of $16,389 thousand related to the sale of certain underperforming residential mortgage loans. |
40
Table 29 Quarterly NCOs Franklin-Related Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs (recoveries): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin |
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
64.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
Non-Franklin |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
26.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
$ |
82.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs annualized
percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
7.19 |
% |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
Non-Franklin |
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
41
In assessing NCO trends, it is helpful to understand the process of how these loans are
treated as they deteriorate over time. The allowance for loans are established at origination
consistent with the level of risk associated with the original underwriting. As a part of our
normal portfolio management process for commercial loans, the loan is reviewed and the allowance is
increased or decreased as warranted. If the quality of a loan has deteriorated, it migrates to a
lower quality risk rating, and a higher reserve amount is assigned.
Charge-offs, if necessary, are generally recognized in a period after the allowance was
established. If the previously established allowance exceeds that needed to satisfactorily resolve
the problem loan, a reduction in the overall level of the allowance could be recognized. In
summary, if loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence is periods of allowance
building, followed by periods of higher NCOs as the previously established allowance is utilized.
Additionally, an increase in the allowance either precedes or is in conjunction with increases in
NALs. When a loan is classified as NAL, it is evaluated for specific allowance or charge-off. As
a result, an increase in NALs does not necessarily result in an increase in the allowance or an
expectation of higher future NCOs.
C&I NCOs declined $16.9 million, or 29%, reflected lower levels of large dollar NCOs in the
current quarter as well as the results of our continued proactive credit risk management practices.
CRE NCOs increased $22.8 million, or 51%, reflected an increase in loan sale activity in the
current quarter combined with our continued aggressive treatment of problem loans, including
conservative valuation of the underlying collateral. The majority of these NCOs were in the
noncore portfolio as our core portfolio continued to perform well. Based on asset quality trends,
we anticipate lower CRE NCOs in future quarters.
Automobile NCOs declined $2.3 million, or 33%, reflected historically lower delinquency levels
during the current quarter and high credit quality of originations. Also, the current quarter
benefited from $0.5 million of recoveries associated with a previously charged-off loan sale.
Home equity NCOs declined $2.5 million, or 8%. This performance was consistent with our
expectations for the portfolio given the economic conditions in our markets. We continue to manage
the default rate through focused delinquency monitoring as virtually all defaults for second-lien
home equity loans incur significant losses primarily due to insufficient equity in the collateral
property.
Residential mortgage NCOs declined $7.8 million, or 29%, included $6.8 million of NCOs related
to a more conservative loss recognition policy (see Consumer Credit section) and Franklin-related
net recoveries of $3.1 million in the current quarter, and the prior quarter included $16.4 million
of NCOs related to the sale of certain underperforming loans and Franklin-related net recoveries of
$4.4 million. Excluding these impacts, residential mortgage NCOs increased $0.4 million,
consistent with our expectations.
42
Table 30
reflects NCO activity for the first three-month period of 2011 and the first
three-month period of 2010. Table 31 displays the NCO Franklin-related impacts for the first
three-month period of 2011 and the first three-month period of 2010.
Table 30 Year to Date Net Charge-off Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net charge-offs by loan and lease type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
42,191 |
|
|
$ |
75,439 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
28,400 |
|
|
|
34,426 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
39,283 |
|
|
|
50,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
67,683 |
|
|
|
85,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
109,874 |
|
|
|
160,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
8,531 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
26,715 |
|
|
|
37,901 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
18,932 |
|
|
|
24,311 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
55,209 |
|
|
|
77,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
$ |
165,083 |
|
|
$ |
238,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs annualized percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
2.45 |
% |
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
18.59 |
|
|
|
9.77 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Table 31 Year to Date NCOs Franklin-Related Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total home equity net charge-offs (recoveries): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Non-Franklin |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity net charge-offs annualized percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
Non-Franklin |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs (recoveries): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin |
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
Non-Franklin |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential mortgage net charge-offs annualized percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
Non-Franklin |
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
44
C&I NCOs decreased $33.2 million, or 44%, primarily reflected significant credit quality
improvement in the underlying portfolio as well as our on-going proactive credit management
practices.
CRE NCOs decreased $17.6 million, or 21%, primarily reflected significant credit quality
improvement in the underlying portfolio as well as our on-going proactive credit management
practices.
Automobile NCOs decreased $3.8 million, or 45%, reflected our consistent high quality
origination profile since the beginning of 2008, as well as a continued strong market for used
automobiles. This focus on origination quality has been the primary driver for the improvement in
this portfolio in the current period compared with the year-ago period. Origination quality
remains high as measured by our vintage analysis.
Home equity NCOs declined $11.2 million, or 30%. The first three-month period of 2010
included $3.7 million of Franklin-related NCOs compared with no Franklin-related NCOs in the
current period. Excluding the Franklin-related impacts, home equity NCOs decreased $7.5 million
compared with the first three-month period of 2010. The performance is consistent with our
expectations for the portfolio.
Residential mortgage NCOs declined $5.4 million, or 22%. The first three-month period of 2010
included $8.1 million of Franklin-related NCOs, while the first three-month period of 2011 included
$6.8 million of NCOs related to a more conservative loss recognition policy (see Consumer Credit
section) and Franklin-related net recoveries of $3.1 million. Excluding these impacts,
residential mortgage NCOs decreased $1.0 million compared with the first three-month period of
2010. Delinquency trends continued to improve, indicating losses should remain manageable even
with the economic stress on our borrowers.
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 4 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.)
During the first three-month period of 2011, we recorded $4.2 million of credit OTTI losses.
This amount was comprised of $3.2 million related to the pooled-trust-preferred securities, $0.8
million related to the CMO securities, and $0.2 million related to the Alt-A mortgage-backed
securities. Given the continued disruption in the housing and financial markets, we may be
required to recognize additional credit OTTI losses in future periods with respect to our
available-for-sale and other securities portfolio. The amount and timing of any additional credit
OTTI will depend on the decline in the underlying cash flows of the securities. If our intent to
hold temporarily impaired securities changes in future periods, we may be required to recognize
noncredit OTTI through income, which will negatively impact earnings.
Alt-A mortgage-backed, Pooled-Trust-Preferred, and Private-Label CMO Securities
Our three highest risk segments of our investment portfolio are the Alt-A mortgage-backed,
pooled-trust-preferred, and private-label CMO portfolios. The Alt-A mortgage-backed securities and
pooled-trust-preferred securities are located within the asset-backed securities portfolio. The
performance of the underlying securities in each of these segments continues to reflect the
economic environment. Each of these securities in these three segments is subjected to a rigorous
review of its projected cash flows. These reviews are supported with analysis from independent
third parties.
The following table presents the credit ratings for our Alt-A mortgage-backed,
pooled-trust-preferred, and private label CMO securities as of March 31, 2011:
Table 32 Credit Ratings of Selected Investment Securities (1)
(dollar amounts in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Credit Rating of Fair Value Amount |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA +/- |
|
|
A +/- |
|
|
BBB +/- |
|
|
<BBB- |
|
Private-label CMO securities |
|
$ |
124.4 |
|
|
$ |
115.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.8 |
|
Alt-A mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Pooled-trust-preferred securities |
|
|
229.2 |
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
418.3 |
|
|
$ |
281.1 |
|
|
$ |
34.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
169.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
435.8 |
|
|
$ |
284.6 |
|
|
$ |
41.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
164.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Credit ratings reflect the lowest current rating assigned by a nationally recognized credit rating agency. |
45
Negative changes to the above credit ratings would generally result in an increase of our
risk-weighted assets, and a reduction to our regulatory capital ratios.
The following table summarizes the relevant characteristics of our pooled-trust-preferred
securities portfolio at March 31, 2011. Each security is part of a pool of issuers and supports a
more senior tranche of securities except for the I-Pre TSL II, MM Comm II and MM Comm III
securities which are the most senior class.
Table 33 Trust-preferred Securities Data
March 31, 2011
(dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferrals |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Defaults |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Issuers |
|
Defaults |
|
|
as a % of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest |
|
Currently |
|
as a % of |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Credit |
|
Performing/ |
|
Original |
|
|
Performing |
|
|
Excess |
|
Deal Name |
|
Par Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Rating(2) |
|
Remaining(3) |
|
Collateral |
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
Subordination(4) |
|
Alesco II(1) |
|
$ |
41,241 |
|
|
$ |
31,540 |
|
|
$ |
11,118 |
|
|
$ |
(20,422 |
) |
|
C |
|
32/38 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Alesco IV(1) |
|
|
20,773 |
|
|
|
8,243 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
(6,517 |
) |
|
C |
|
31/44 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
ICONS |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
BB |
|
28/29 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
I-Pre TSL II |
|
|
36,916 |
|
|
|
36,817 |
|
|
|
25,395 |
|
|
|
(11,422 |
) |
|
A |
|
28/29 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
MM Comm II |
|
|
21,085 |
|
|
|
20,150 |
|
|
|
18,679 |
|
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
BB |
|
4/7 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
MM Comm III |
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
7,185 |
|
|
|
(3,468 |
) |
|
CC |
|
7/11 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Pre TSL IX(1) |
|
|
5,026 |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
C |
|
34/49 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre TSL X(1) |
|
|
17,595 |
|
|
|
9,915 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
(6,593 |
) |
|
C |
|
35/55 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre TSL XI(1) |
|
|
25,239 |
|
|
|
22,725 |
|
|
|
7,678 |
|
|
|
(15,047 |
) |
|
C |
|
43/64 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre TSL XIII(1) |
|
|
27,939 |
|
|
|
22,703 |
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
(16,305 |
) |
|
C |
|
43/65 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reg
Diversified(1) |
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(7,004 |
) |
|
D |
|
23/44 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Soloso(1) |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
(3,405 |
) |
|
C |
|
43/69 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tropic III |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
9,877 |
|
|
|
(21,123 |
) |
|
CC |
|
25/45 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
295,964 |
|
|
$ |
229,186 |
|
|
$ |
107,491 |
|
|
$ |
(121,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Security was determined to have OTTI. As such, the book value is net of recorded credit impairment. |
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of comparability, the lowest credit rating expressed is equivalent to Fitch ratings even where the lowest rating is based on another nationally recognized credit rating agency. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes both banks and/or insurance companies. |
|
(4) |
|
Excess subordination percentage represents the additional defaults in excess of both current and projected defaults that the CDO can absorb before the bond experiences credit impairment. Excess subordinated
percentage is calculated by (a) determining what percentage of defaults a deal can experience before the bond has credit impairment, and (b) subtracting from this default breakage percentage both total current and
expected future default percentages. |
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and
liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market
interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, credit spreads, and expected lease residual
values. We have identified two primary sources of market risk: interest rate risk and price risk.
Interest Rate Risk
OVERVIEW
Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and value arising from changes in market interest
rates. Interest rate risk arises from timing differences in the repricings and maturities of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (reprice risk), changes in the expected
maturities of assets and liabilities arising from embedded options, such as borrowers ability to
prepay residential mortgage loans at any time and depositors ability to redeem certificates of
deposit before maturity (option risk), changes in the shape of the yield curve where interest rates
increase or decrease in a non-parallel fashion (yield curve risk), and changes in spread
relationships between different yield curves, such as U.S. Treasuries and LIBOR (basis risk).
46
INCOME SIMULATION AND ECONOMIC VALUE ANALYSIS
Interest rate risk measurement is performed monthly. Two broad approaches to modeling
interest rate risk are employed: income simulation and economic value analysis. An income
simulation analysis is used to measure the sensitivity of forecasted net interest income to changes
in market rates over a one-year time period. Although bank owned life insurance, automobile
operating lease assets, and excess cash balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank are classified as
noninterest earning assets, and the net revenue from these assets is recorded in noninterest income
and noninterest expense, these portfolios are included in the interest sensitivity analysis because
they have attributes similar to interest-earning assets. EVE analysis is used to measure the
sensitivity of the values of period-end assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates.
EVE analysis serves as a complement to income simulation modeling as it provides risk exposure
estimates for time periods beyond the one-year simulation period.
The models used for these measurements take into account prepayment speeds on mortgage loans,
mortgage-backed securities, and consumer installment loans, as well as cash flows of other assets
and liabilities. Balance sheet growth assumptions are also
considered in the income simulation model. The models include the effects of derivatives,
such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and other types of interest rate options.
The baseline scenario for income simulation analysis, with which all other scenarios are
compared, is based on market interest rates implied by the prevailing yield curve as of the
period-end. Alternative interest rate scenarios are then compared with the baseline scenario.
These alternative interest rate scenarios include parallel rate shifts on both a gradual and an
immediate basis, movements in interest rates that alter the shape of the yield curve (e.g., flatter
or steeper yield curve), and no changes in current interest rates for the entire measurement
period. Scenarios are also developed to measure short-term repricing risks, such as the impact of
LIBOR-based interest rates rising or falling faster than the prime rate.
The simulations for evaluating short-term interest rate risk exposure are scenarios that model
gradual +/-100 and +/-200 basis points parallel shifts in market interest rates over the next
one-year period beyond the interest rate change implied by the current yield curve. We assumed
market interest rates would not fall below 0% over the next one-year period for the scenarios that
used the -100 and -200 basis points parallel shift in market interest rates. The table below shows
the results of the scenarios as of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. All of the positions
were within the board of directors policy limits as of March 31, 2011, except for the -100 basis
points scenario.
Table 34 Net Interest Income at Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income at Risk (%) |
|
Basis point change scenario |
|
-200 |
|
|
-100 |
|
|
+100 |
|
|
+200 |
|
Board policy limits |
|
|
-4.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
|
-4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
-3.5 |
|
|
|
-2.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
-3.2 |
|
|
|
-1.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
The net interest income at risk reported as of March 31, 2011 for the +200 basis points
scenario shows a significant change to an asset sensitive near-term interest rate risk position
compared with December 31, 2010. The ALCOs strategy is to be near-term asset-sensitive to a
rising rate scenario. The primary factor contributing to this change is the termination of $4.1
billion of interest rate swaps maturing through June 2012. The terminations also impacted exposure
to declining interest rate scenarios, resulting in the -100 basis points scenario exceeding the
board of directors policy limit. A key factor which impacts the exposure to declining interest
rates is an assumption that rates paid on deposit products, such as money market accounts, savings
accounts, and interest-bearing checking accounts, will not decline much further from current rates
being paid. However, management would most likely lower the rates on these deposit products if the
economic climate associated with a declining interest rate environment warranted such action. The
ALCO recommended, and the board approved, an exception to the policy limit noting a low probability
of rates going lower. The ALCO has no immediate plans to take any action at this time to bring the
down 100 basis point scenario results within policy limits.
The following table shows the income sensitivity of select portfolios to changes in market
interest rates. A portfolio with 100% sensitivity would indicate that interest income and expense
will change with the same magnitude and direction as interest rates. A portfolio with 0%
sensitivity is insensitive to changes in interest rates. For the +200 basis points scenario, total
interest-sensitive income is 41.6% sensitive to changes in market interest rates, while total
interest-sensitive expense is 43.3% sensitive to changes in market interest rates. However, net
interest income at risk for the +200 basis points scenario has a neutral near-term interest rate
risk position because of the larger base of total interest-sensitive income relative to total
interest-sensitive expense.
47
Table 35 Interest Income/Expense Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Percent Change in Interest Income/Expense for a Given |
|
|
|
Total Earning |
|
|
Change in Interest Rates |
|
|
|
Assets (1) |
|
|
Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Ramp |
|
Basis point change scenario |
|
|
|
|
-200 |
|
|
-100 |
|
|
+100 |
|
|
+200 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
-21.5 |
% |
|
|
-32.1 |
% |
|
|
46.1 |
% |
|
|
46.3 |
% |
Total investments and other earning assets |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
-18.9 |
|
|
|
-22.0 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Total interest sensitive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20.4 |
|
|
|
-29.3 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
-9.9 |
|
|
|
-11.7 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
-20.5 |
|
|
|
-38.4 |
|
|
|
71.5 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
|
Total interest-sensitive expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11.3 |
|
|
|
-15.4 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 36 Economic Value of Equity at Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Value of Equity at Risk (%) |
|
Basis point change scenario |
|
-200 |
|
|
-100 |
|
|
+100 |
|
|
+200 |
|
Board policy limits |
|
|
-12.0 |
% |
|
|
-5.0 |
% |
|
|
-5.0 |
% |
|
|
-12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
-3.5 |
|
|
|
-7.7 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
-0.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
-4.0 |
|
|
|
-8.9 |
|
The EVE at risk reported as of March 31, 2011, for the +200 basis points scenario shows a
change to a lower long-term liability sensitive position compared with December 31, 2010. The
primary factor contributing to this change is the termination of $4.1 billion of interest rate
swaps maturing through June 2012.
The following table shows the economic value sensitivity of select portfolios to changes in
market interest rates. The change in economic value for each portfolio is measured as the percent
change from the base economic value for that portfolio. For the +200 basis points scenario, total
net tangible assets decreased in value 3.4% to changes in market interest rates, while total net
tangible liabilities increased in value 2.6% to changes in market interest rates.
Table 37 Economic Value Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net |
|
|
Percent Change in Economic Value for a Given |
|
|
|
Tangible |
|
|
Change in Interest Rates |
|
|
|
Assets (1) |
|
|
Over / (Under) Base Case Parallel Shocks |
|
Basis point change scenario |
|
|
|
|
-200 |
|
|
-100 |
|
|
+100 |
|
|
+200 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
-1.4 |
% |
|
|
-2.8 |
% |
Total investments and other earning assets |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
-3.3 |
|
|
|
-6.6 |
|
Total net tangible assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
-1.7 |
|
|
|
-3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
-2.6 |
|
|
|
-1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
-1.6 |
|
|
|
-0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Total net tangible liabilities (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2.5 |
|
|
|
-1.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At March 31, 2011. |
|
(2) |
|
Tangible assets excluding ALLL. |
|
(3) |
|
Tangible liabilities excluding AULC. |
MSRs
(This section should be read in conjunction with Note 5 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.)
At March 31, 2011, we had a total of $202.6 million of capitalized MSRs representing the right
to service $16.5 billion in mortgage loans. Of this $202.6 million, $119.2 million was recorded
using the fair value method, and $83.4 million was recorded using the amortization method. When we
actively engage in hedging, the MSR asset is carried at fair value.
48
MSR fair values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net
servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans,
which can be greatly reduced by prepayments. Prepayments usually increase when mortgage interest
rates decline and decrease when mortgage interest rates rise. We have employed strategies to
reduce the risk of MSR fair value changes or impairment. In addition, we engage a third party to
provide valuation tools and assistance with our strategies with the objective to decrease the
volatility from MSR fair value changes. However, volatile changes in interest rates can diminish
the effectiveness of these hedges. We typically report MSR fair value adjustments net of
hedge-related trading activity in the mortgage banking income category of noninterest income.
Changes in fair value between reporting dates are recorded as an increase or a decrease in mortgage
banking income.
MSRs recorded using the amortization method generally relate to loans originated with
historically low interest rates, resulting in a lower probability of prepayments and, ultimately,
impairment. MSR assets are included in other assets and presented in Table 9.
Price Risk
Price risk represents the risk of loss arising from adverse movements in the prices of
financial instruments that are carried at fair value and are subject to fair value accounting. We
have price risk from trading securities, securities owned by our broker-dealer subsidiaries,
foreign exchange positions, equity investments, investments in securities backed by mortgage loans,
and marketable equity securities held by our insurance subsidiaries. We have established loss
limits on the trading portfolio, on the amount of foreign exchange exposure that can be maintained,
and on the amount of marketable equity securities that can be held by the insurance subsidiaries.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of loss due to the possibility that funds may not be available to
satisfy current or future commitments resulting from external macro market issues, investor and
customer perception of financial strength, and events unrelated to us, such as war, terrorism, or
financial institution market specific issues. We manage liquidity risk at both the Bank and the
parent company.
Bank Liquidity and Sources of Liquidity
Our primary sources of funding for the Bank are retail and commercial core deposits. At March
31, 2011, these core deposits funded 74% of total assets. At March 31, 2011, total core deposits
represented 95% of total deposits, an increase from 93% at the prior year-end.
Core deposits are comprised of interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand deposits, money
market deposits, savings and other domestic deposits, consumer certificates of deposit both over
and under $250,000, and nonconsumer certificates of deposit less than $250,000. Noncore deposits
consist of brokered money market deposits and certificates of deposit, foreign time deposits, and
other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more comprised primarily of public fund certificates of
deposit more than $250,000.
Core deposits may increase our need for liquidity as certificates of deposit mature or are
withdrawn before maturity and as nonmaturity deposits, such as checking and savings account
balances, are withdrawn.
Demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loan balances were $12.0 million,
$13.1 million, and $15.5 million at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010,
respectively.
Other domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more and brokered deposits and negotiable CDs
totaled $1.8 billion, $2.2 billion, and $2.3 billion at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and
March 31, 2010, respectively.
49
The following table reflects deposit composition detail for each of the past five quarters:
Table 38 Deposit Composition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
By Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
7,597 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
7,217 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
6,926 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
6,463 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
6,938 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Demand deposits interest-bearing |
|
|
5,532 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,469 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,347 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,948 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
13,105 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
13,410 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
12,679 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
10,644 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Savings and other domestic
deposits |
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4,652 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,208 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8,525 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
8,765 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
8,974 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
9,441 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
39,204 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
39,264 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
38,330 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
37,376 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
37,637 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Other domestic deposits of $250,000
or more |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Deposits in foreign offices |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
41,366 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
41,854 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
41,072 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
39,849 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
40,303 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
12,785 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
12,476 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
$ |
12,262 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
$ |
11,515 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
$ |
11,844 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Personal |
|
|
26,419 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
26,788 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
25,861 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
25,793 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
$ |
39,204 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
39,264 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
38,330 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
37,376 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
37,637 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To the extent we are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, we may
meet our liquidity needs through sources of wholesale funding. These sources include other
domestic time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered deposits and negotiable
CDs, deposits in foreign offices, short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, other long-term debt,
and subordinated notes. At March 31, 2011, total wholesale funding was $7.6 billion, a decrease
from $8.4 billion at December 31, 2010.
The Bank also has access to the Federal Reserves discount window. These borrowings are
secured by commercial loans and home equity lines-of-credit. The Bank is also a member of the
FHLB, and as such, has access to advances from this facility. These advances are generally secured
by residential mortgages, other mortgage-related loans, and available-for-sale securities.
Information regarding amounts pledged, for the ability to borrow if necessary, and the unused
borrowing capacity at both the Federal Reserve Bank and the FHLB, is outlined in the following
table:
Table 39 Federal Reserve and FHLB Borrowing Capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in billions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Loans and Securities Pledged: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and securities pledged |
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused borrowing capacity at Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB |
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
We can also obtain funding through other methods including: (1) purchasing federal funds,
(2) selling securities under repurchase agreements, (3) the sale or maturity of investment
securities, (4) the sale or securitization of loans, (5) the sale of national market certificates
of deposit, (6) the relatively shorter-term structure of our commercial loans and automobile loans,
and (7) the issuance of common and preferred stock.
At March 31, 2011, we believe the Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow
obligations for the foreseeable future.
50
Parent Company Liquidity
The parent companys funding requirements consist primarily of dividends to shareholders, debt
service, income taxes, operating expenses, funding of nonbank subsidiaries, repurchases of our
stock, and acquisitions. The parent company obtains funding to meet obligations from interest
received from the Bank, interest and dividends received from direct subsidiaries, net taxes
collected from subsidiaries included in the federal consolidated tax return, fees for services
provided to subsidiaries, and the issuance of debt securities.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the parent company had $0.6 billion in cash and cash
equivalents. Appropriate limits and guidelines are in place to ensure the parent company has
sufficient cash to meet operating expenses and other commitments during 2011 without relying on
subsidiaries or capital markets for funding.
During the 2010 fourth quarter, we completed a public offering and sale of 146.0 million
shares of common stock at a price of $6.30 per share, or $920.0 million in aggregate gross
proceeds. Also during the 2010 fourth quarter, we completed the public offering and sale of $300.0
million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% Subordinated Notes due 2020. We used the net proceeds
from these transactions to repurchase our TARP Capital. On January 19, 2011, we repurchased the
warrant we had issued to the Treasury at an agreed upon purchase price of $49.1 million. The
warrant had entitled the Treasury to purchase 23.6 million shares of common stock.
Based on the current dividend of $0.01 per common share, cash demands required for common
stock dividends are estimated to be approximately $8.6 million per quarter. Based on the current
dividend, cash demands required for Series A Preferred Stock are estimated to be approximately $7.7
million per quarter.
Based on a regulatory dividend limitation, the Bank could not have declared and paid a
dividend to the parent company at March 31, 2011, without regulatory approval. We do not
anticipate that the Bank will need to request regulatory approval to pay dividends in the near
future as we continue to build Bank regulatory capital above its already Well-capitalized level.
To help meet any additional liquidity needs, we have an open-ended, automatic shelf registration
statement filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt
or equity securities.
With the exception of the common and preferred dividends previously discussed, the parent
company does not have any significant cash demands. There are no maturities of parent company
obligations until 2013, when a debt maturity of $50.0 million is payable.
Considering the factors discussed above, and other analyses that we have performed, we believe
the parent company has sufficient liquidity to meet its cash flow obligations for the foreseeable
future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, we enter into various off-balance sheet arrangements. These
arrangements include financial guarantees contained in standby letters of credit issued by the Bank
and commitments by the Bank to sell mortgage loans.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private
borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most
of these arrangements mature within two years and are expected to expire without being drawn upon.
Standby letters of credit are included in the determination of the amount of risk-based capital
that the parent company and the Bank are required to hold.
Through our credit process, we monitor the credit risks of outstanding standby letters of
credit. When it is probable that a standby letter of credit will be drawn and not repaid in full,
losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At March 31, 2011, we had $0.6 billion
of standby letters of credit outstanding, of which 77% were collateralized. Included in this $0.6
billion are letters of credit issued by the Bank that support securities that were issued by our
customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment Company, our broker-dealer subsidiary.
We enter into forward contracts relating to the mortgage banking business to hedge the
exposures we have from commitments to extend new residential mortgage loans to our customers and
from our mortgage loans held for sale. At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, we
had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $360.9 million, $998.7 million, and $600.9
million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.
We do not believe that off-balance sheet arrangements will have a material impact on our
liquidity or capital resources.
51
Operational Risk
As with all companies, we are subject to operational risk. Operational risk is the risk of
loss due to human error; inadequate or failed internal systems and controls; violations of, or
noncompliance with, laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, or ethical standards; and
external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security
risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls to ensure compliance
with laws, rules, and regulations, and to improve the oversight of our operational risk.
To mitigate operational risks, we have established a senior management Operational Risk
Committee and a senior management Legal, Regulatory, and Compliance Committee. The
responsibilities of these committees, among other duties, include establishing and maintaining
management information systems to monitor material risks and to identify potential concerns, risks,
or trends that may have a significant impact and ensuring that recommendations are developed to
address the identified issues. Both of these committees report any significant findings and
recommendations to the Risk Management Committee. Additionally, potential concerns may be
escalated to our Board Risk Oversight Committee, as appropriate.
The goal of this framework is to implement effective operational risk techniques and
strategies, minimize operational and fraud losses, and enhance our overall performance.
Representation and Warranty Reserve
We primarily conduct our loan sale and securitization activity with Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac. In connection with these and other securitization transactions, we make certain
representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and
underwriting standards. We may be required to repurchase individual loans and / or indemnify these
organizations against losses due to a loan not meeting the established criteria. We have a reserve
for such losses, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities. The reserves were
estimated based on historical and expected repurchase activity, average loss rates, and current
economic trends. The level of mortgage loan repurchase losses depends upon economic factors,
investor demand strategies and other external conditions containing a level of uncertainty and risk
that may change over the life of the underlying loans. We do not believe we have sufficient
information to estimate the range of reasonably possible loss related to representation and
warranty exposure.
The table below reflects activity in the representations and warranties reserve:
Table 40 Summary of Reserve for Representations and Warranties on Mortgage Loans Serviced for Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
First |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Reserve for representations and warranties, beginning of
period |
|
$ |
20,170 |
|
|
$ |
18,026 |
|
|
$ |
10,519 |
|
|
$ |
5,920 |
|
|
$ |
5,916 |
|
Acquired reserve for representations and warranties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve charges |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(4,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,787 |
) |
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
Provision for representations and warranties |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
6,474 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for representations and warranties, end of period |
|
$ |
23,785 |
|
|
$ |
20,170 |
|
|
$ |
18,026 |
|
|
$ |
10,519 |
|
|
$ |
5,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosure Documentation
Recently, several high volume servicers have announced the execution of consent orders with
various federal regulators. Those consent orders do not preclude the assessment of civil money
penalties in the future by the regulators.
Compared to the high volume servicers, we service a relatively low volume of residential
mortgage foreclosures, with approximately 3,900 foreclosure cases as of March 31, 2011, in states
that require foreclosures to proceed through the courts. We have reviewed and are continuing to
review our residential foreclosure process. We have no reason to conclude that foreclosures were
filed that should not have been filed. We have and are strengthening our processes and controls to
ensure that our foreclosure processes do not have the deficiencies identified in those institutions
which are the subject of the consent orders.
Compliance Risk
Financial institutions are subject to a myriad of laws, rules and regulations emanating at
both the federal and state levels. These mandates cover a broad scope, including but not limited
to, expectations on anti-money laundering, lending limits, client privacy, fair lending, community
reinvestment, and other important areas. Recently, the volume and complexity of regulatory changes
adds to the overall compliance risk. At Huntington, we take these mandates seriously and have
invested in people, processes, and systems to help ensure we meet expectations. At the corporate
level, we have a team of compliance experts and lawyers dedicated to ensuring our conformance. We
provide, and require, training for our colleagues on a number of broad-based laws and regulations.
For example, all of our employees are expected to take, and pass, courses on anti-money laundering
and customer privacy. Those who are engaged in lending activities must also take training related
to flood disaster protection, equal credit opportunity, fair lending, and / or a variety of other
courses related to the extension of credit. We set a high standard of expectation for adherence to
compliance management and seek to continuously enhance our performance in this regard.
52
Capital
(This section should be read in conjunction with Significant Item 2.)
Capital is managed both at the Bank and on a consolidated basis. Capital levels are maintained
based on regulatory capital requirements and the economic capital required to support credit,
market, liquidity, and operational risks inherent in our business, and to provide the flexibility
needed for future growth and new business opportunities. Shareholders equity totaled $5.0
billion at March 31, 2011, a slight increase from December 31, 2010, primarily reflecting an
increase in retained earnings.
We believe our current level of capital is adequate.
TARP Capital
As discussed in our 2010 Form 10-K, we fully exited our TARP relationship during the 2011
first quarter by repurchasing the ten-year warrant we had issued to the Treasury as part of the
TARP Capital for $49.1 million. Refer to the 2010 Form 10-K for a complete discussion regarding
the issuing and repayment of our TARP Capital.
Capital Adequacy
The following table presents risk-weighted assets and other financial data necessary to
calculate certain financial ratios that we use to measure capital adequacy.
Table 41 Capital Adequacy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Consolidated capital calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity |
|
$ |
4,676 |
|
|
$ |
4,618 |
|
|
$ |
3,867 |
|
|
$ |
3,742 |
|
|
$ |
3,678 |
|
Preferred shareholders equity |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
Other intangible assets
deferred tax liability (1) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tangible equity (2) |
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
Preferred shareholders equity |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tangible common equity (2) |
|
$ |
4,092 |
|
|
$ |
4,025 |
|
|
$ |
3,264 |
|
|
$ |
3,130 |
|
|
$ |
3,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
52,949 |
|
|
$ |
53,820 |
|
|
$ |
53,247 |
|
|
$ |
51,771 |
|
|
$ |
51,867 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
Other intangible assets |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
Other intangible assets
deferred tax liability (1) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tangible assets (2) |
|
$ |
52,365 |
|
|
$ |
53,227 |
|
|
$ |
52,644 |
|
|
$ |
51,159 |
|
|
$ |
51,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital |
|
$ |
5,179 |
|
|
$ |
5,022 |
|
|
$ |
5,480 |
|
|
$ |
5,317 |
|
|
$ |
5,090 |
|
Preferred shareholders equity |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
(1,692 |
) |
Trust-preferred securities |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
REIT-preferred stock |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity (2) |
|
$ |
4,196 |
|
|
$ |
4,039 |
|
|
$ |
3,160 |
|
|
$ |
3,001 |
|
|
$ |
2,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets (RWA) |
|
$ |
43,024 |
|
|
$ |
43,471 |
|
|
$ |
42,759 |
|
|
$ |
42,486 |
|
|
$ |
42,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity / RWA ratio (2) |
|
|
9.75 |
% |
|
|
9.29 |
% |
|
|
7.39 |
% |
|
|
7.06 |
% |
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible equity / tangible asset ratio (2) |
|
|
8.51 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
|
|
9.43 |
|
|
|
9.43 |
|
|
|
9.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity / tangible asset ratio (2) |
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity / RWA ratio (2) |
|
|
9.51 |
|
|
|
9.26 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other intangible assets are net of deferred tax liability, and calculated assuming a 35% tax rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Tangible equity, Tier 1 common equity, tangible common equity, and tangible assets are non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, any ratios utilizing these financial measures are
also non-GAAP. These financial measures have been included as they are considered to be critical metrics with which to analyze and evaluate financial condition and capital strength.
Other companies may calculate these financial measures differently. |
53
Our consolidated TCE ratio was 7.81% at March 31, 2011, an increase from 7.56% at
December 31, 2010. The 25 basis point increase from December 31, 2010, primarily reflected the
combination of an increase in retained earnings and lower period-end tangible assets, partially
offset by the repurchase of the TARP warrant during the current quarter.
Regulatory Capital
Regulatory capital ratios are the primary metrics used by regulators in assessing the safety
and soundness of banks. We intend to maintain both our and the Banks risk-based capital ratios at
levels at which both would be considered Well-capitalized by regulators. The Bank is primarily
supervised and regulated by the OCC, which establishes regulatory capital guidelines for banks
similar to those established for bank holding companies by the Federal Reserve Board.
Regulatory capital primarily consists of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. The sum of Tier 1
capital and Tier 2 capital equals our total risk-based capital. The following table reflects
changes and activity to the various components utilized in the calculation of our consolidated Tier
1, Tier 2, and total risk-based capital amounts during the first three-month period of 2011.
Table 42 Consolidated Regulatory Capital Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disallowed |
|
|
Disallowed |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Qualifying |
|
|
Goodwill & |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Equity (1) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Core Capital (2) |
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
Adjustments (net) |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
4,815.1 |
|
|
$ |
362.5 |
|
|
$ |
620.3 |
|
|
$ |
(607.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(168.9 |
) |
|
$ |
5,021.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.4 |
|
Changes to disallowed adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
21.0 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
Repurchase of TARP Capital warrant |
|
|
(49.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.1 |
) |
Disallowance of deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
4,879.6 |
|
|
$ |
362.5 |
|
|
$ |
620.3 |
|
|
$ |
(585.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(98.3 |
) |
|
$ |
5,178.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Qualifying |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital |
|
|
risk-based |
|
|
|
ACL |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Tier 2 Capital |
|
|
(from above) |
|
|
capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
552.3 |
|
|
$ |
710.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,262.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,021.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,284.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in qualifying
subordinated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
Change in qualifying ACL |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
Changes to Tier 1 Capital (see
above) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156.8 |
|
|
|
156.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
545.7 |
|
|
$ |
665.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,211.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,178.6 |
|
|
$ |
6,389.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes accumulated other comprehensive income and minority interest. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes minority interest. |
54
The following table presents our regulatory capital ratios at both the consolidated and
Bank levels for each of the past five quarters:
Table 43 Regulatory Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Total risk-weighted assets (in millions) |
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
43,024 |
|
|
$ |
43,471 |
|
|
$ |
42,759 |
|
|
|
42,486 |
|
|
$ |
42,522 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
42,750 |
|
|
|
43,281 |
|
|
|
42,503 |
|
|
|
42,249 |
|
|
|
42,511 |
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
9.80 |
% |
|
|
9.41 |
% |
|
|
10.54 |
% |
|
|
10.45 |
% |
|
|
10.05 |
% |
|
|
Bank |
|
|
7.23 |
|
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
6.85 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
12.04 |
|
|
|
11.55 |
|
|
|
12.82 |
|
|
|
12.51 |
|
|
|
11.97 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
8.87 |
|
|
|
8.51 |
|
|
|
8.28 |
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
|
|
7.11 |
|
Total risk-based capital ratio |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
14.85 |
|
|
|
14.46 |
|
|
|
15.08 |
|
|
|
14.79 |
|
|
|
14.28 |
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
13.11 |
|
|
|
12.82 |
|
|
|
12.69 |
|
|
|
12.23 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
The increase in our consolidated Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios compared with December
31, 2010 primarily reflected current quarter earnings, a reduction in the disallowed deferred tax
asset, and a slight decline in risk-weighted assets, partially offset by the negative impact
related to the repurchase of the TARP warrants.
At March 31, 2011, our Tier 1 and total risk-based capital in excess of the minimum level
required to be considered Well-capitalized were $2.6 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. The
Bank had Tier 1 and total risk-based capital in excess of the minimum level required to be
considered Well-capitalized of $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2011.
Other Capital Matters
Our strong capital ratios and expectations for continued earnings growth positions us to
actively explore capital management opportunities, including raising our dividend.
55
BUSINESS SEGMENT DISCUSSION
Overview
This section reviews financial performance from a business segment perspective and should be
read in conjunction with the Discussion of Results of Operations, Note 17 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and other sections for a full understanding of our
consolidated financial performance.
Business segment results are determined based upon our management reporting system, which
assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is
designed around our organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results derived
are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial institutions.
Funds Transfer Pricing
We use an active and centralized FTP methodology to attribute appropriate net interest income
to the business segments. The intent of the FTP methodology is to eliminate all interest rate risk
from the business segments by providing matched duration funding of assets and liabilities. The
result is to centralize the financial impact, management, and reporting of interest rate and
liquidity risk in the Treasury / Other function where it can be centrally monitored and managed.
The Treasury / Other function charges (credits) an internal cost of funds for assets held in (or
pays for funding provided by) each business segment. The FTP rate is based on prevailing market
interest rates for comparable duration assets (or liabilities), and includes an estimate for the
cost of liquidity (liquidity premium). Deposits of an indeterminate maturity receive an FTP credit
based on a combination of vintage-based average lives and replicating portfolio pool rates. Other
assets, liabilities, and capital are charged (credited) with a four-year moving average FTP rate.
The denominator in the net interest margin calculation has been modified to add the amount of net
funds provided by each business segment for all periods presented.
Revenue Sharing
Revenue is recorded in the business segment responsible for the related product or service.
Fee sharing is recorded to allocate portions of such revenue to other business segments involved in
selling to, or providing service to, customers. Results of operations for the business segments
reflect these fee sharing allocations.
Expense Allocation
The management accounting process that develops the business segment reporting utilizes
various estimates and allocation methodologies to measure the performance of the business segments.
Expenses are allocated to business segments using a two-phase approach. The first phase consists
of measuring and assigning unit costs (activity-based costs) to activities related to product
origination and servicing. These activity-based costs are then extended, based on volumes, with
the resulting amount allocated to business segments that own the related products. The second
phase consists of the allocation of overhead costs to all four business segments from Treasury /
Other. We utilize a full-allocation methodology, where all Treasury / Other expenses, except those
related to our insurance business, reported Significant Items (except for the goodwill impairment),
and a small amount of other residual unallocated expenses, are allocated to the four business
segments.
Treasury / Other
The Treasury / Other function includes revenue and expense related to our insurance business,
and assets, liabilities, and equity not directly assigned or allocated to one of the four business
segments. Assets include investment securities, bank owned life insurance, and the OREO properties
acquired through the 2009 first quarter Franklin restructuring. The financial impact associated
with our FTP methodology, as described above, is also included.
Net interest income includes the impact of administering our investment securities portfolios
and the net impact of derivatives used to hedge interest rate sensitivity. Noninterest income
includes insurance income, miscellaneous fee income not allocated to other business segments, such
as bank owned life insurance income and any investment security and trading asset gains or losses.
Noninterest expense includes any insurance-related expenses, as well as certain corporate
administrative, merger, and other miscellaneous expenses not allocated to other business segments.
The provision for income taxes for the business segments is calculated at a statutory 35% tax rate,
though our overall effective tax rate is lower. As a result, Treasury / Other reflects a credit
for income taxes representing the difference between the lower actual effective tax rate and the
statutory tax rate used to allocate income taxes to the business segments.
56
Net Income by Business Segment
We reported net income of $126.4 million during the first three-month period of 2011. This
compared with net income of $39.7 million during the first three-month period of 2010. The
segregation of net income by business segment for the first three-month period of 2011 and 2010 is
presented in the following table:
Table 44 Net Income by Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Retail and Business Banking |
|
$ |
54,887 |
|
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
Regional and Commercial Banking |
|
|
24,067 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
AFCRE |
|
|
34,656 |
|
|
|
(40,637 |
) |
WGH |
|
|
9,448 |
|
|
|
17,923 |
|
Treasury/Other |
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
52,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment
The segregation of total average loans and leases and total average deposits by business
segment for the first three-month period of 2011, is presented in the following table:
Table 45 Average Loans/Leases and Deposits by Business Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury / |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Business Banking |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
AFCRE |
|
|
WGH |
|
|
Other |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
Average Loans/Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
2,966 |
|
|
$ |
7,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
13,121 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
7,803 |
|
|
|
7,368 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
19,645 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,701 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
6,907 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7,728 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4,465 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
8,362 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5,840 |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
18,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases |
|
$ |
11,780 |
|
|
$ |
7,824 |
|
|
$ |
13,208 |
|
|
$ |
5,192 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
38,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
3,511 |
|
|
$ |
2,032 |
|
|
$ |
394 |
|
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
7,333 |
|
Demand deposits interest-bearing |
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5,357 |
|
Money market deposits |
|
|
8,297 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,492 |
|
Savings and other domestic deposits |
|
|
4,533 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,701 |
|
Core certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits |
|
|
28,949 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
6,023 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
39,274 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
29,139 |
|
|
$ |
3,666 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
7,394 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
41,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Retail and Business Banking
Table 46 Key Performance Indicators for Retail and Business Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
235,845 |
|
|
$ |
203,405 |
|
|
$ |
32,440 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
23,694 |
|
|
|
67,974 |
|
|
|
(44,280 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
94,428 |
|
|
|
94,645 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
222,137 |
|
|
|
214,777 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
29,555 |
|
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
54,887 |
|
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
|
$ |
44,943 |
|
|
|
452 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent) |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets (in millions) |
|
$ |
13,157 |
|
|
$ |
13,158 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total average loans/leases (in millions) |
|
|
11,780 |
|
|
|
11,779 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits (in millions) |
|
|
29,139 |
|
|
|
28,371 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
12 |
|
NCOs |
|
$ |
39,008 |
|
|
$ |
69,718 |
|
|
$ |
(30,710 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases |
|
|
1.32 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
(1.05 |
)% |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Retail banking # DDA households (eop) |
|
|
1,005,107 |
|
|
|
936,081 |
|
|
|
69,026 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Business banking # business DDA relationships (eop) |
|
|
122,271 |
|
|
|
114,335 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
N.R. Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period. |
|
eop End of Period. |
2011 First Three Months vs. 2010 First Three Months
Retail and Business Banking reported net income of $54.9 million for the first three-month
period of 2011, compared with net income of $9.9 million in the first three-month period of 2010.
As discussed further below, the $44.9 million increase included a $32.4 million, or 16%, increase
in the net interest income and a $44.3 million, or 65%, decline in the provision for credit losses,
partially offset by a $24.2 million increase in income taxes.
Net interest income increased $32.4 million, or 16%, primarily reflecting a $0.8 billion
increase in average total deposits, a 39 basis point improvement in our deposit spread, and a 7%
increase in the number of DDA households. These increases were the result of increased sales
results throughout 2010 and 2011, particularly in our money market and checking account deposit
products through the use of more targeted direct mail and advertising of 24-Hour Grace, part of
our Fair Play banking philosophy.
Total average loans and leases were flat between the first three-month period of 2011, and the
first three-month period in 2010. The CRE portfolio declined $103 million and reflected our
ongoing commitment to reduce our exposure to CRE loans. This CRE decrease was partially offset by
a $50 million increase in our C&I portfolio. We also sold SBA loans of $38.0 million, and the
gains are referenced below.
Provision for credit losses declined $44.3 million, or 65%, reflecting lower NCOs and
improvement in delinquencies. NCOs declined $30.7 million, or 44%, and reflected a $10.1 million
decline in total commercial NCOs, and a $20.7 million decline in total consumer NCOs. The decrease
in NCOs reflected a lower level of large dollar charge-offs, improvement in delinquencies, and an
improved credit environment.
58
Noninterest income decreased $0.2 million, or 0.2%, reflecting a $14.6 million decline in
deposit service charges resulting from the amendment to Reg E, the reduction or elimination of
certain overdraft fees, and the introduction of our new 24-Hour Grace consumer checking feature.
The decrease was partially offset by (1) $3.6 million increase in electronic banking income,
primarily reflecting an increased number of deposit accounts and transaction volumes, (2) $2.3
million increase in mortgage banking income, (3) $1.0 million increase in brokerage and insurance
income, and (4) $7.5 million increase in other income primarily related to recognition of
additional gains on sales of SBA loans.
Noninterest expense increased $7.3 million, or 3%. This increase reflected: (1) $5.4 million
increase in personnel expense reflecting a 5% increase in full-time equivalent employees and salary
increases, (2) $5.5 million increase in marketing expenses related to branch and product
advertising and direct mail efforts, and branch and ATM branding investments in support of
strategic initiatives, and (3) $1.0 million increase in equipment expenses related to branch
refurbishment and rebrand strategies. These increases were partially offset by: (1) $1.8 million
improvement in OREO losses, (2) $1.1 million of lower allocated expenses, and (3) $1.4 million of
lower amortization of intangibles expense.
59
Regional and Commercial Banking
Table 47 Key Performance Indicators for Regional and Commercial Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
57,438 |
|
|
$ |
50,831 |
|
|
$ |
6,607 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
41,207 |
|
|
|
(35,238 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
29,238 |
|
|
|
25,393 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
43,681 |
|
|
|
35,554 |
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
12,959 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
13,147 |
|
|
|
(6,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
24,067 |
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
24,416 |
|
|
|
N.R. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent) |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets (in millions) |
|
$ |
8,722 |
|
|
$ |
8,143 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Total average loans/leases (in millions) |
|
|
7,824 |
|
|
|
7,322 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Total average deposits (in millions) |
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
8 |
|
NCOs |
|
$ |
15,160 |
|
|
$ |
40,509 |
|
|
$ |
(25,349 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
(1.43 |
)% |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
N.R. |
|
|
|
|
N.R. Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period. |
2011 First Three Months vs. 2010 First Three Months
Regional and Commercial Banking reported net income of $24.1 million in the first three-month
period of 2011, compared with a net loss of $0.3 million in the first three-month period of 2010.
This $24.4 million improvement reflected a $35.2 million decline in provision for credit losses.
The increased earnings also reflected significant improvement in our net interest income and
noninterest income due to the successful execution of our strategic initiatives. Noninterest
expense and total FTEs have increased as a result of these strategic investments.
Net interest income increased $6.6 million, or 13%. The primary drivers of this increase are
due to: (1) $0.5 billion, or 7%, increase in average total loans and leases, (2) $0.6 billion, or
22%, increase in average core deposits, and (3) net interest margin expanded 22 basis points. The
commercial loan spread improved by 34 basis points primarily due to a lower cost of funds on our
renewals. In addition, as the liquidity position of the Bank improved in 2010, the liquidity
premium was lowered for new and renewed loans.
Average total loans and leases increased $0.5 billion, or 7%, primarily reflecting the
successful execution of our strategic initiatives, higher sales performance levels within our
primary markets, and investments in additional leadership, expertise and sales talent. Seven out
of our eleven markets experienced loan growth during this time period. Our core middle market loan
portfolio average balance grew $259 million from the 2010 first quarter. The majority of this
growth was due to marketing efforts and community development within our Michigan and Cleveland
markets. Our equipment finance portfolio grew $180 million, or 21%, from the 2010 first quarter
due to our focus on developing vertical strategies in business aircraft, rail, and syndications.
Our large corporate portfolio grew $279 million due to establishing relationships with targeted
prospects within our footprint.
We have made significant investments in our sales process, with an emphasis on our Optimal
Customer Relationship, or OCR, program which entails robust customer relationship planning, as well
as a renewed investment in technology, including a referral tracking system and new customer
relationship management system. These investments have resulted in loan originations in the 2011
first quarter that increased 75% from the year-ago period.
Total average deposits increased $0.5 billion, or 17%, primarily reflecting a $0.6 billion
increase in core deposits. The increase in core deposits primarily reflected: (1) $0.5 billion
increase in commercial savings and money market deposits; and (2) $0.1 billion increase in
commercial demand deposits. These increases were primarily a result of strategic initiatives to
deepen customer relationships, new and innovative product offerings, pricing discipline and sales &
retention initiatives.
60
The Commercial Relationship Manager sales teams were educated on the importance of liquidity
solutions in partnering with Treasury Management to deliver customer-focused solutions. This
partnership, combined with the value of depository solutions, enabled our relationship managers to
shift from a lending focus to a broader solutions-based cross-selling approach, including
depository solutions. Targeted money market promotions and sales campaigns for loans and other
products were deployed in Regional and Commercial Banking. They served as an effective door
opener to drive success in ultimately obtaining operating account
supported with Treasury management solutions which generally produce longer relationships.
Best practices from each region were shared and institutionalized. A money desk was created to
assist commercial bankers with tailored pricing solutions for customers having complex large dollar
depository needs. This additional support and expertise helped our bankers win relationships and
encouraged their expanded prospecting efforts.
Provision for credit losses declined $35.2 million, or 86%, reflecting improved credit quality
of the portfolio, as well as a $25.3 million decline in NCOs. Expressed as a percentage of related
average balances, NCOs decreased to 0.78% in the 2011 first quarter from 2.21% in the 2010 first
quarter. The decline was primarily driven by $27.4 million lower C&I NCOs, partially offset by
$2.4 million higher CRE NCOs. The overall decline in NCOs was the result of proactive treatment of
problem credits since mid-2009, an improved credit environment, and increased recoveries.
Noninterest income increased $3.8 million, or 15%, and primarily reflected: (1) $1.2 million
in derivatives revenue due to increased sales and trading activities, (2) $1.3 million in brokerage
income reflecting the transfer of our institutional sales business to Regional and Commercial
Banking from WGH during the first three-month period of 2011, (3) $1.1 million in capital markets
income resulting from strategic investments made over the last year in these types of products and
services, and (4) $0.5 million increase of loan-related fees relating to the improved collection
efforts. These increases were partially offset by a $0.9 million decline in equipment operating
lease income as lease originations were structured as direct finance leases beginning in the 2009
second quarter.
Noninterest expense increased $8.1 million, or 23%, and reflected a $7.7 million increase in
personnel expense due to a 27% increase in full-time equivalent employees. This increase in
personnel is attributable to our strategic investments in our core footprint markets, vertical
strategies, and product capabilities.
61
Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
Table 48 Key Performance Indicators for Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
87,849 |
|
|
$ |
77,044 |
|
|
$ |
10,805 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4,784 |
|
|
|
117,639 |
|
|
|
(112,855 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
13,379 |
|
|
|
17,101 |
|
|
|
(3,722 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
43,127 |
|
|
|
39,025 |
|
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
18,661 |
|
|
|
(21,882 |
) |
|
|
(40,543 |
) |
|
|
N.R. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
34,656 |
|
|
$ |
(40,637 |
) |
|
$ |
75,293 |
|
|
|
N.R. |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets (in millions) |
|
$ |
13,165 |
|
|
$ |
12,749 |
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total average loans/leases (in millions) |
|
|
13,208 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total average deposits (in millions) |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
11 |
|
NCOs |
|
$ |
73,450 |
|
|
$ |
103,432 |
|
|
$ |
(29,982 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
(1.01 |
)% |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
N.R. |
|
Automobile loans production (in millions) |
|
$ |
795.3 |
|
|
$ |
677.7 |
|
|
$ |
117.6 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
13,379 |
|
|
|
17,101 |
|
|
|
(3,722 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Operating lease income |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
12,303 |
|
|
|
(3,456 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income, excluding operating lease income |
|
$ |
4,532 |
|
|
$ |
4,798 |
|
|
$ |
(266 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
$ |
43,127 |
|
|
$ |
39,025 |
|
|
$ |
4,102 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Operating lease expense |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense, excluding operating lease expense |
|
$ |
36,291 |
|
|
$ |
28,959 |
|
|
$ |
7,332 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.R. Not relevant, as denominator of calculation is a loss in prior period compared with income in current period. |
2011 First Three Months vs. 2010 First Three Months
AFCRE reported net income of $34.7 million for the first three-month period 2011, compared
with a net loss of $40.6 million in the same period in 2010. The $75.3 million increase reflected a
$112.9 million decline to the provision for credit losses, primarily due to a reduction in reserves
as the underlying credit quality of the loan portfolios continues to improve and / or stabilize.
The comparable year-ago period included higher provisions for credit losses to increase reserves
due to economic and CRE related weaknesses in our markets. Total NCOs declined $30.0 million, or
29%, including a $21.4 million decline in commercial real estate loan NCOs and a $3.9 million
decline in consumer automobile-related NCOs. As a percentage of average balances, CRE NCOs
decreased to 4.46% in the 2011 first quarter compared to 5.05% in the 2010 first quarter while
automobile-related NCOs decreased to 0.33% as compared to 0.80% during the same periods.
Net interest income increased $10.8 million, or 14%, reflecting a 26 basis point increase in
the net interest margin and a 3% increase in average total loans and leases. The increase in the
net interest margin primarily reflects the continuation of a risk-based pricing strategy in the CRE
portfolio that began in early 2009.
Total average loans and leases reflected a $1.5 billion increase in average consumer
automobile loans and leases that resulted primarily from record loan origination levels in 2010 and
continued strong origination levels in 2011. This growth reflects further penetration within our
historical geographic footprint, as well as the positive impact of our expansion into eastern
Pennsylvania and five New England states. This increase was partially offset by a $1.0 billion
decline in average commercial real estate loans resulting from the aggressive management of this
portfolio and our ongoing commitment to reducing our commercial real estate exposure.
62
Total average deposits increased $0.1 billion, or 20%, reflecting our commitment to
strengthening relationships with core customers and prospects as well as new commercial automobile
dealer relationships developed in 2010 and 2011.
Noninterest income, excluding operating lease income, decreased $0.3 million. Increases in
commercial real estate fee related income totaling $3.0 million were primarily offset by a $2.2
million reduction in valuation adjustments associated with certain securitized loans and related
debt that are accounted for at fair value, a $0.4 million decline in servicing-related income and a
$0.2 million decline in fee income received in connection with end of term automobile lease
terminations.
Noninterest expense, excluding operating lease expense, increased $7.3 million. This increase
reflected a $1.8 million increase in personnel expense, much of which related to increased loan
origination activities, including the rebuilding of the commercial real
estate team and automobile lending market expansion, and a $5.3 million increase in allocated
costs primarily related to higher production and other activity levels.
Net automobile operating lease income decreased $0.2 million as this portfolio continues to
run-off as a result of the discontinuation of all lease origination activities at the end of 2008.
63
Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending
Table 49 Key Performance Indicators for Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands unless otherwise noted) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
48,900 |
|
|
$ |
37,927 |
|
|
$ |
10,973 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
14,938 |
|
|
|
(3,311 |
) |
|
|
18,249 |
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
66,751 |
|
|
|
70,211 |
|
|
|
(3,460 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Noninterest expense |
|
|
86,178 |
|
|
|
83,875 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,087 |
|
|
|
9,651 |
|
|
|
(4,564 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,448 |
|
|
$ |
17,923 |
|
|
$ |
(8,475 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees (full-time equivalent) |
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets (in millions) |
|
$ |
6,605 |
|
|
$ |
6,027 |
|
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Total average loans/leases (in millions) |
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
4,631 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Total average deposits (in millions) |
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
NCOs |
|
$ |
21,367 |
|
|
$ |
13,302 |
|
|
$ |
8,065 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
NCOs as a % of average loans and leases |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
43 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Mortgage banking origination volume (in millions) |
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Noninterest income shared with other business segments(1) |
|
$ |
9,874 |
|
|
$ |
8,178 |
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Total assets under management (in billions) eop |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Total trust assets (in billions) eop |
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount is not included in noninterest income reported above. |
|
eop End of Period. |
2011 First Three Months vs. 2010 First Three Months
WGH reported net income of $9.4 million for the first three-month period of 2011, compared
with net income of $17.9 million for the first three-month period of 2010. As discussed further
below, the $8.5 million decrease included an $18.2 million increase in the provision for credit
losses and a $3.5 million decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by an $11.0 million
increase in net interest income and a $4.6 million decrease in provision for income taxes.
Net interest income increased by $11.0 million, or 29%, primarily reflecting an increase in
the net interest margin by 5 basis points to 2.30%. These increases were the result of lower
market rates for deposit accounts which more than offset lower loan rates.
Total average loans and leases increased $561 million, or 12%, for the first three-month
period of 2011 when compared to the first three-month period of 2010. This reflected increased
originations of adjustable rate mortgage loans in our portfolio. Total average deposits increased
$635 million, or 9%, during the same period. This increase was attributable to execution of
strategic initiatives and reflected growth in money market deposits.
64
Provision for credit losses increased by $18.2 million. During the 2011 first quarter, fewer
commercial loan upgrades favorably impacted the provision by approximately $10.2 million when
compared with the prior year quarter. During the 2011 first quarter, we implemented a more
conservative position regarding NCOs by accelerating the timing of charge-off recognition. This
policy change resulted in an $8.1 million increase in NCOs when compared with the 2010 first
quarter.
Noninterest income decreased by $3.5 million, or 5%, reflecting a $4.9 million decline in
mortgage banking income due to a $3.5 million net loss on MSR hedging compared with a $6.1 million
gain in the year-ago quarter and a $2.5 million decrease in other income, partially offset by: (1)
a $1.3 million increase in brokerage income primarily reflecting increased sales revenue involving
investment products and (2) a $3.0 million increase in trust services reflecting a $9.1 billion
increase in total trust assets (including a
$1.8 billion increase in assets under management) due to improved market values and net growth
in accounts, and higher fees for income tax preparation.
Noninterest expense increased by $2.3 million, or 3%, from the year-ago period based on an
increase in strategic initiatives investment including a 7% increase in full-time equivalent
employees.
65
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, including MD&A, contains certain forward-looking statements, including certain
plans, expectations, goals, projections, and statements, which are subject to numerous assumptions,
risks, and uncertainties. Statements that do not describe historical or current facts, including
statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking
statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Actual results could differ materially from those contained or implied by such statements for
a variety of factors including: (1) worsening of credit quality performance due to a number of
factors such as the underlying value of the collateral could prove less valuable than otherwise
assumed and assumed cash flows may be worse than expected; (2) changes in economic conditions; (3)
movements in interest rates; (4) competitive pressures on product pricing and services; (5)
success, impact, and timing of our business strategies, including market acceptance of any new
products or services introduced to implement our Fair Play banking philosophy; (6) changes in
accounting policies and principles and the accuracy of our assumptions and estimates used to
prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements; (7) extended disruption of vital infrastructure; and
(8) the nature, extent, and timing of governmental actions and reforms, including the Dodd-Frank
Act, as well as future regulations which will be adopted by the relevant regulatory agencies,
including the newly created CFPB, to implement the Dodd-Frank Acts provisions. Additional factors
that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be found in our 2010
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and documents subsequently filed by us with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on
information available at that time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to
reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by federal securities laws.
As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be
exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements.
Risk Factors
Information on risk is discussed in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our 2010
Form 10-K. Additional information regarding risk factors can also be found in the Risk Management
and Capital discussion of this report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Significant Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to establish critical accounting policies and make
accounting estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect amounts recorded and reported in our
financial statements. Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2010
Form 10-K as supplemented by this report lists significant accounting policies we use in the
development and presentation of our financial statements. This MD&A, the significant accounting
policies, and other financial statement disclosures identify and address key variables and other
qualitative and quantitative factors necessary for an understanding and evaluation of our company,
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
An accounting estimate requires assumptions about uncertain matters that could have a material
effect on the financial statements if a different amount within a range of estimates were used or
if estimates changed from period to period. Estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a
point in time, and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce results that
significantly differ from when those estimates were made.
Our most significant accounting estimates relate to our ACL, fair value measurements, and
income taxes and deferred tax assets. These significant accounting estimates and their related
application are discussed in our 2010 Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
Note 2 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting
pronouncements adopted during 2011 and the expected impact of accounting pronouncements recently
issued but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards
materially affect financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are
discussed in the applicable section of this MD&A and the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
66
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
Financial Statements |
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,208,820 |
|
|
$ |
847,888 |
|
|
$ |
1,310,640 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks |
|
|
129,999 |
|
|
|
135,038 |
|
|
|
364,082 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
164,489 |
|
|
|
185,404 |
|
|
|
150,463 |
|
Loans held for sale
(includes $162,768, $754,117 and $319,166 respectively, measured at fair value)(1) |
|
|
164,282 |
|
|
|
793,285 |
|
|
|
327,408 |
|
Available-for-sale and other securities |
|
|
9,322,434 |
|
|
|
9,895,244 |
|
|
|
8,946,364 |
|
Loans and leases (includes $458,851, $522,717 and $730,508 respectively, measured at fair value)(2) |
|
|
38,245,836 |
|
|
|
38,106,507 |
|
|
|
36,931,681 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(1,133,226 |
) |
|
|
(1,249,008 |
) |
|
|
(1,477,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
|
37,112,610 |
|
|
|
36,857,499 |
|
|
|
35,453,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,471,099 |
|
|
|
1,458,224 |
|
|
|
1,422,874 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
500,736 |
|
|
|
491,602 |
|
|
|
491,573 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
444,268 |
|
|
|
444,268 |
|
|
|
444,268 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
215,251 |
|
|
|
228,620 |
|
|
|
273,952 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
2,214,521 |
|
|
|
2,482,570 |
|
|
|
2,681,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
52,948,509 |
|
|
$ |
53,819,642 |
|
|
$ |
51,866,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
41,366,487 |
|
|
$ |
41,853,898 |
|
|
$ |
40,303,467 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
2,051,258 |
|
|
|
2,040,732 |
|
|
|
980,839 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
21,379 |
|
|
|
172,519 |
|
|
|
157,895 |
|
Other long-term debt (includes $294,905, $356,089 and $573,018 respectively, measured at fair value)(2) |
|
|
1,900,555 |
|
|
|
2,144,092 |
|
|
|
2,727,745 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
1,487,566 |
|
|
|
1,497,216 |
|
|
|
1,266,907 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
1,082,665 |
|
|
|
1,130,643 |
|
|
|
1,060,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
47,909,910 |
|
|
|
48,839,100 |
|
|
|
46,497,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock authorized 6,617,808 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% Series B Non-voting, Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value
of $0.01 and liquidation value per share of $1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329,186 |
|
8.50% Series A Non-cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred
Stock, par value of $0.01 and liquidation value
per share of $1,000 |
|
|
362,507 |
|
|
|
362,507 |
|
|
|
362,507 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
8,643 |
|
|
|
8,642 |
|
|
|
7,174 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
7,584,367 |
|
|
|
7,630,093 |
|
|
|
6,735,472 |
|
Less treasury shares, at cost |
|
|
(8,647 |
) |
|
|
(8,771 |
) |
|
|
(9,019 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(203,921 |
) |
|
|
(197,496 |
) |
|
|
(133,473 |
) |
Retained (deficit) earnings |
|
|
(2,704,350 |
) |
|
|
(2,814,433 |
) |
|
|
(2,922,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
5,038,599 |
|
|
|
4,980,542 |
|
|
|
5,369,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
52,948,509 |
|
|
$ |
53,819,642 |
|
|
$ |
51,866,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares authorized (par value of $0.01) |
|
|
1,500,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000,000 |
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
864,279,984 |
|
|
|
864,195,369 |
|
|
|
717,382,476 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
863,398,578 |
|
|
|
863,319,435 |
|
|
|
716,556,641 |
|
Treasury shares outstanding |
|
|
881,406 |
|
|
|
875,934 |
|
|
|
825,835 |
|
Preferred shares issued |
|
|
1,967,071 |
|
|
|
1,967,071 |
|
|
|
1,967,071 |
|
Preferred shares outstanding |
|
|
362,507 |
|
|
|
362,507 |
|
|
|
1,760,578 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent loans for which Huntington has elected the fair value option. See Note
12. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent certain assets and liabilities of a consolidated VIE for which Huntington has
elected the fair value option. See Note 14. |
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
67
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest and fee income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
433,961 |
|
|
$ |
479,120 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
57,651 |
|
|
|
58,988 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
3,091 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
501,877 |
|
|
|
546,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
75,796 |
|
|
|
128,302 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
Subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
20,582 |
|
|
|
22,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
97,547 |
|
|
|
152,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
404,330 |
|
|
|
393,893 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
49,385 |
|
|
|
235,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
354,945 |
|
|
|
158,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
54,324 |
|
|
|
69,339 |
|
Mortgage banking income |
|
|
22,684 |
|
|
|
25,038 |
|
Trust services income |
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
27,765 |
|
Electronic banking income |
|
|
28,786 |
|
|
|
25,137 |
|
Insurance income |
|
|
17,945 |
|
|
|
18,860 |
|
Brokerage income |
|
|
20,511 |
|
|
|
16,902 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income |
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
16,470 |
|
Automobile operating lease income |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
12,303 |
|
Net gains on sales of investment securities |
|
|
4,205 |
|
|
|
6,430 |
|
Impairment losses on investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment recoveries (losses) on investment securities |
|
|
9,876 |
|
|
|
(8,400 |
) |
Noncredit-related (recoveries) losses on securities not expected
to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income) |
|
|
(14,041 |
) |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities |
|
|
(4,165 |
) |
|
|
(6,461 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
38,247 |
|
|
|
29,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
236,945 |
|
|
|
240,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
219,028 |
|
|
|
183,642 |
|
Outside data processing and other services |
|
|
40,282 |
|
|
|
39,082 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
28,436 |
|
|
|
24,755 |
|
Deposit and other insurance expense |
|
|
17,896 |
|
|
|
29,086 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
13,465 |
|
|
|
11,530 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
22,477 |
|
|
|
20,624 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
22,697 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
13,370 |
|
|
|
15,146 |
|
OREO and foreclosure expense |
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
10,066 |
|
Automobile operating lease expense |
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
48,083 |
|
|
|
30,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
430,699 |
|
|
|
398,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
161,191 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
34,745 |
|
|
|
(38,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
126,446 |
|
|
|
39,737 |
|
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
7,703 |
|
|
|
29,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
118,743 |
|
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares basic |
|
|
863,359 |
|
|
|
716,320 |
|
Average common shares diluted |
|
|
867,237 |
|
|
|
718,593 |
|
Per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Net income diluted |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
68
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
(All amounts in thousands, |
|
Series B |
|
|
Series A |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
except for per share amounts) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
(Deficit) |
|
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,325,008 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
$ |
362,507 |
|
|
|
716,741 |
|
|
$ |
7,167 |
|
|
$ |
6,731,796 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,465 |
) |
|
$ |
(156,985 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,922,026 |
) |
|
$ |
5,336,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for consolidation of variable
interest entities, net of tax of $3,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,249 |
) |
|
|
(3,462 |
) |
|
|
(7,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period as adjusted |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,325,008 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
$ |
362,507 |
|
|
|
716,741 |
|
|
$ |
7,167 |
|
|
$ |
6,731,796 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,465 |
) |
|
|
(161,234 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,925,488 |
) |
|
$ |
5,328,291 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,737 |
|
|
|
39,737 |
|
Noncredit-related impairment recoveries
(losses) on debt securities not expected
to be sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
Unrealized net gains (losses) on
available-for-sale and other
securities
arising during the period, net of
reclassification for net realized
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,558 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow
hedging derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
Change in accumulated unrealized
losses for pension and other post-
retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,498 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
Preferred Series B stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($0.01 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,165 |
) |
|
|
(7,165 |
) |
Preferred Series B ($12.50 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,476 |
) |
|
|
(17,476 |
) |
Preferred Series A ($21.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,703 |
) |
|
|
(7,703 |
) |
Recognition of the fair value of
share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
Other share-based compensation activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
242 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,778 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
2,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,329,186 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
$ |
362,507 |
|
|
|
717,382 |
|
|
$ |
7,174 |
|
|
$ |
6,735,472 |
|
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,019 |
) |
|
$ |
(133,473 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,922,161 |
) |
|
$ |
5,369,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
$ |
362,507 |
|
|
|
864,195 |
|
|
$ |
8,642 |
|
|
$ |
7,630,093 |
|
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,771 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,814,433 |
) |
|
$ |
4,980,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,446 |
|
|
|
126,446 |
|
Noncredit-related impairment recoveries
(losses) on debt securities not expected
to be sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,127 |
|
Unrealized net gains (losses) on
available-for-sale and other
securities
arising during the period, net of
reclassification for net realized
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,730 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow
hedging derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,422 |
) |
Change in accumulated unrealized
losses for pension and other post-
retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,021 |
|
Repurchase of warrants convertible to
common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,100 |
) |
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common ($0.01 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,635 |
) |
|
|
(8,635 |
) |
Preferred Series A ($21.25 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,703 |
) |
|
|
(7,703 |
) |
Recognition of the fair value of
share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
Other share-based compensation activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
$ |
362,507 |
|
|
|
864,280 |
|
|
$ |
8,643 |
|
|
$ |
7,584,367 |
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,647 |
) |
|
$ |
(203,921 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,704,350 |
) |
|
$ |
5,038,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
69
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
49,385 |
|
|
|
235,008 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
73,234 |
|
|
|
69,730 |
|
Change in current and deferred income taxes |
|
|
22,694 |
|
|
|
(38,153 |
) |
Net sales (purchases) of trading account securities |
|
|
20,915 |
|
|
|
(66,806 |
) |
Originations of loans held for sale |
|
|
(625,250 |
) |
|
|
(634,129 |
) |
Principal payments on and proceeds from loans held for sale |
|
|
1,207,216 |
|
|
|
765,286 |
|
Securities (gains) losses |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(119,639 |
) |
|
|
(54,571 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
|
|
754,961 |
|
|
|
316,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest bearing deposits in banks |
|
|
13,107 |
|
|
|
7,570 |
|
Proceeds from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities and calls of investment securities |
|
|
449,045 |
|
|
|
673,751 |
|
Sales of investment securities |
|
|
1,457,057 |
|
|
|
716,752 |
|
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
(1,287,517 |
) |
|
|
(1,582,391 |
) |
Net proceeds from sales of loans |
|
|
162,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan and lease activity, excluding sales |
|
|
(470,891 |
) |
|
|
53,992 |
|
Proceeds from sale of operating lease assets |
|
|
20,060 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(26,587 |
) |
|
|
(13,233 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of other real estate |
|
|
24,540 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
341,684 |
|
|
|
(125,496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
(485,107 |
) |
|
|
(193,616 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
|
|
73,843 |
|
|
|
113,766 |
|
Maturity/redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(151,193 |
) |
|
|
(11,153 |
) |
Maturity/redemption of long-term debt |
|
|
(107,870 |
) |
|
|
(278,257 |
) |
Repurchase of Warrant to the Treasury |
|
|
(49,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
(7,703 |
) |
|
|
(25,179 |
) |
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(8,618 |
) |
|
|
(7,144 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(735,713 |
) |
|
|
(401,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
360,932 |
|
|
|
(210,704 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
847,888 |
|
|
|
1,521,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,208,820 |
|
|
$ |
1,310,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) |
|
$ |
12,033 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
121,911 |
|
|
|
160,273 |
|
Non-cash activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter |
|
|
15,391 |
|
|
|
23,326 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
70
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Huntington reflect
all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals which are, in the opinion of Management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, the results of
operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the SEC and,
therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
appearing in Huntingtons 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2010 Form 10-K), which include
descriptions of significant accounting policies, as updated by the information contained in this
report, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements.
For statement of cash flows purposes, cash and cash equivalents are defined as the sum of
Cash and due from banks which includes amounts on deposit with the Federal Reserve and Federal
funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.
In conjunction with applicable accounting standards, all material subsequent events have been
either recognized in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosed in the
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-6 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820):
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The ASU amends Subtopic 820-10 with new
disclosure requirements and clarification of existing disclosure requirements. New disclosures
required include the amount of significant transfers in and out of levels 1 and 2 fair value
measurements and the reasons for the transfers. In addition, the reconciliation for level 3
activity is required on a gross rather than net basis. The ASU provides additional guidance
related to the level of disaggregation in determining classes of assets and liabilities and
disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The amendments are effective for annual or
interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide
the reconciliation for level 3 activity on a gross basis which is effective for annual or interim
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 (See Note 12).
ASU 2010-20 Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The ASU requires expanded disclosure about the
credit quality of the loan portfolio in the notes to financial statements, such as aging
information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated
by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on how the lender
develops its ACL and how it manages its credit exposure. The disclosures related to period-end
balances are effective for annual or interim reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010, and
the disclosures of activity that occurs during the reporting period are effective for annual or
interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 (See Note 3).
ASU 2011-02 Receivables (Topic 310), A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a
Troubled Debt Restructuring. The ASU amends Subtopic 310-40 to clarify existing guidance related to
a creditors evaluation of whether a restructuring of debt is considered a TDR. The amendments add
additional clarity in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor
is experiencing financial difficulties. The updated guidance and related disclosure requirements
are effective for financial statements issued for the first interim or annual period beginning on
or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retroactively to the beginning of the annual period
of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the
guidance on Huntingtons Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
71
3. LOANS / LEASES AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition
The following table provides a detail listing of Huntingtons loan and lease portfolio at
March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
$ |
12,245 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
6,651 |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
5,802 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
7,784 |
|
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,614 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
38,246 |
|
|
|
38,106 |
|
|
|
36,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(1,133 |
) |
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
(1,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
$ |
37,113 |
|
|
$ |
36,857 |
|
|
$ |
35,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in the table above, the primary loan and lease portfolios are: C&I, CRE, automobile,
home equity, residential mortgage, and other consumer. For ACL purposes, these portfolios are
further disaggregated into classes. The classes within the C&I portfolio are: owner occupied and
other C&I. The classes within the CRE portfolio are: retail properties, multi family, office,
industrial and warehouse, and other CRE. The classes within the home equity portfolio are:
first-lien loans and second-lien loans. The automobile, residential mortgage, and other consumer
portfolios are not further segregated into classes.
The Bank has access to the Federal Reserves discount window and advances from the FHLB
Cincinnati. As of March 31, 2011, these borrowings and advances are generally secured by $17.4
billion of loans and securities.
NALs and Past Due Loans
Loans are considered past due when the contractual amounts due with respect to principal and
interest are not received within 30 days of the contractual due date. All classes within the C&I
and CRE portfolios are placed on nonaccrual status no later than 90-days past due. Residential
mortgage loans are placed on nonaccrual status no later than 180-days past due, with the exception
of residential mortgages guaranteed by government organizations which continue to accrue interest.
Both classes of the home equity portfolio are placed on nonaccrual status no later than 180-days
past due. Automobile and other consumer loans are not placed on nonaccrual status, but are
charged-off when the loan is 120-days past due. Any loan in any portfolio may be placed on
nonaccrual status prior to the policies described above when collection of principal or interest is
in doubt. For all classes within all loan portfolios, when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status,
any accrued interest income is reversed with current year accruals charged to interest income, and
prior year amounts charged-off as a credit loss.
For all classes within all loan portfolios, cash receipts received on NALs are applied
entirely against principal until the loan or lease has been collected in full, after which time any
additional cash receipts are recognized as interest income.
Regarding all classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios, when, in Managements judgment, the
borrowers ability to make required principal and interest payments resumes and collectability is
no longer in doubt, and the loan has been brought current with respect to principal and interest,
the loan or lease is returned to accrual status. Regarding all classes within all consumer loan
portfolios, a NAL is returned to accrual status when the loan has been brought to less than
180-days past due with respect to principal and interest.
72
The following table presents NALs by loan class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
Other commercial and industrial |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Office |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Other commercial real estate |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
The following table presents an aging analysis of loans and leases, including past due loans,
by loan class: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 or more days |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
past due and |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
30-59 Days |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 or more days |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Current |
|
|
and Leases |
|
|
accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
3,759 |
|
|
$ |
3,861 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
9,306 |
|
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
13,065 |
|
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Multi family |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
Office |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
5,967 |
|
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
5,751 |
|
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 or more days |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
past due and |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
30-59 Days |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 or more days |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Current |
|
|
and Leases |
|
|
accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
3,718 |
|
|
$ |
3,823 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
9,059 |
|
|
|
9,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
12,777 |
|
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
1,665 |
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Multi family |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Office |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
6,271 |
|
|
$ |
6,651 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
5,547 |
|
|
$ |
5,615 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
4,592 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
NALs are included in this aging analysis based on the loans past due status. |
74
Allowance for Credit Losses
Huntington maintains two reserves, both of which reflect Managements judgment regarding the
adequate level necessary to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio: the ALLL
and the AULC. Combined, these reserves comprise the total ACL. The determination of the ACL
requires significant estimates, including the timing and amounts of expected future cash flows on
impaired loans and leases, consideration of current economic conditions, and historical loss
experience pertaining to pools of homogeneous loans and leases, all of which may be susceptible to
change.
The adequacy of the ACL is based on Managements current judgments about the credit quality of
the loan portfolio. These judgments consider on-going evaluations of the loan and lease portfolio,
including such factors as the differing economic risks associated with each loan category, the
financial condition of specific borrowers, the level of delinquent loans, the value of any
collateral and, where applicable, the existence of any guarantees or other documented support.
Further, Management evaluates the impact of changes in interest rates and overall economic
conditions on the ability of borrowers to meet their financial obligations when quantifying our
exposure to credit losses and assessing the adequacy of our ACL at each reporting date. In addition
to general economic conditions and the other factors described above, additional factors also
considered include: the impact of declining residential real estate values; the diversification of
CRE loans, particularly loans secured by retail properties; and the amount of C&I loans to
businesses in areas of Ohio and Michigan that have historically experienced less economic growth
compared with other footprint markets. Also, the ACL assessment includes the on-going assessment
of credit quality metrics, and a comparison of certain ACL adequacy benchmarks to current
performance. Managements determinations regarding the adequacy of the ACL are reviewed and
approved by the Companys board of directors.
The ACL is increased through a provision for credit losses that is charged to earnings, based
on Managements quarterly evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, and is reduced by
charge-offs, net of recoveries, and the ACL associated with securitized or sold loans.
The ALLL consists of two components: (1) the transaction reserve, which includes specific
reserves related to loans considered to be impaired and loans involved in troubled debt
restructurings, and (2) the general reserve. The transaction reserve component includes both (1)
an estimate of loss based on pools of commercial and consumer loans and leases with similar
characteristics and (2) an estimate of loss based on an impairment review of each C&I and CRE loan
greater than $1 million. For the C&I and CRE portfolios, the estimate of loss based on pools of
loans and leases with similar characteristics is made through the use of a standardized loan
grading system that is applied on an individual loan level and updated on a continuous basis. This
loan grading system incorporates a probability-of-default (PD) factor and a loss-given-default
(LGD) factor. The PD factor considers on-going reviews of the financial performance of the
specific borrower, including cash flow, debt-service coverage ratio, earnings power, debt level,
and equity position, in conjunction with an assessment of the borrowers industry and future
prospects. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of collateral and the relative LTV ratio.
These reserve factors are developed based on credit migration models that track historical
movements of loans between loan ratings over time and a combination of long-term average loss
experience of our own portfolio and external industry data.
In the case of more homogeneous portfolios, such as automobile loans, home equity loans, and
residential mortgage loans, the determination of the transaction reserve also incorporates PD and
LGD factors, however, the estimate of loss is based on pools of loans and leases with similar
characteristics. The PD factor considers current credit scores unless the account is delinquent,
in which case a higher PD factor is used. The LGD factor considers analysis of the type of
collateral and the relative LTV ratio. Credit scores, models, analyses, and other factors used to
determine both the PD and LGD factors are updated frequently to capture the recent behavioral
characteristics of the subject portfolios, as well as any changes in loss mitigation or credit
origination strategies, and adjustments to the reserve factors are made as needed.
The general reserve consists of economic reserve and risk-profile reserve components. The
economic reserve component considers the potential impact of changing market and economic
conditions on portfolio performance. The risk-profile component considers items unique to our
structure, policies, processes, and portfolio composition, as well as qualitative measurements and
assessments of the loan portfolios including, but not limited to, management quality,
concentrations, portfolio composition, industry comparisons, and internal review functions.
The estimate for the AULC is determined using the same procedures and methodologies as used
for the ALLL. The loss factors used in the AULC are the same as the loss factors used in the ALLL
while also considering a historical utilization of unused commitments. The AULC is reflected in
accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
75
The following table presents ALLL and AULC activity by portfolio segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for Credit Losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL balance at January 1, 2011: |
|
$ |
340,614 |
|
|
$ |
588,251 |
|
|
$ |
49,488 |
|
|
$ |
150,630 |
|
|
$ |
93,289 |
|
|
$ |
26,736 |
|
|
$ |
1,249,008 |
|
|
|
Loan charge-offs |
|
|
(53,736 |
) |
|
|
(76,648 |
) |
|
|
(9,975 |
) |
|
|
(28,322 |
) |
|
|
(23,021 |
) |
|
|
(7,305 |
) |
|
|
(199,007 |
) |
Recoveries of loans
previously
charged-off |
|
|
11,544 |
|
|
|
8,965 |
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
2,455 |
|
|
|
33,924 |
|
Provision for loan
and lease losses |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
(9,500 |
) |
|
|
6,086 |
|
|
|
25,455 |
|
|
|
22,384 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
49,301 |
|
Allowance for loans
sold or transferred
to loans held for
sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL balance at March 31, 2011: |
|
$ |
299,563 |
|
|
$ |
511,068 |
|
|
$ |
50,862 |
|
|
$ |
149,371 |
|
|
$ |
96,741 |
|
|
$ |
25,621 |
|
|
$ |
1,133,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AULC balance at January 1, 2011: |
|
$ |
32,726 |
|
|
$ |
6,158 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
894 |
|
|
$ |
42,127 |
|
Provision for
unfunded loan
commitments and
letters of credit |
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AULC balance at March 31, 2011: |
|
$ |
30,706 |
|
|
$ |
8,433 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,241 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
42,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
330,269 |
|
|
$ |
519,501 |
|
|
$ |
50,862 |
|
|
$ |
151,612 |
|
|
$ |
96,742 |
|
|
$ |
26,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,175,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of ALLL balance at March 31,
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
loans individually
evaluated for
impairment |
|
$ |
43,824 |
|
|
$ |
62,161 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
1,780 |
|
|
$ |
12,103 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
$ |
121,296 |
|
Attributable to
loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
255,739 |
|
|
|
448,907 |
|
|
|
49,917 |
|
|
|
147,591 |
|
|
|
84,638 |
|
|
|
25,138 |
|
|
|
1,011,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ALLL evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
299,563 |
|
|
$ |
511,068 |
|
|
$ |
50,862 |
|
|
$ |
149,371 |
|
|
$ |
96,741 |
|
|
$ |
25,621 |
|
|
$ |
1,133,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL associated with portfolio loans
acquired with deteriorated credit
quality |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loans and Leases at March 31, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
|
$ |
7,784 |
|
|
$ |
4,517 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
38,246 |
|
Portion of ending balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
Collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
13,112 |
|
|
|
5,960 |
|
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
7,744 |
|
|
|
4,175 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
37,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
|
$ |
7,784 |
|
|
$ |
4,517 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
38,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans acquired with
deteriorated credit quality |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Portfolio loans purchased in the 2011
first quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans with allowance sold or
transferred to loans held for sale in
the 2011 first quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans without allowance sold
or transferred to loans held for sale
in the 2011 first quarter |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
ALLL at December 31, 2010
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of ALLL balance at December
31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to
loans individually
evaluated for
impairment |
|
$ |
63,307 |
|
|
$ |
65,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
1,498 |
|
|
$ |
11,780 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
143,860 |
|
Attributable to
loans collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
277,307 |
|
|
|
523,121 |
|
|
|
48,011 |
|
|
|
149,132 |
|
|
|
81,509 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
1,105,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL balance at December 31, 2010: |
|
$ |
340,614 |
|
|
$ |
588,251 |
|
|
$ |
49,488 |
|
|
$ |
150,630 |
|
|
$ |
93,289 |
|
|
$ |
26,736 |
|
|
$ |
1,249,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLL associated with portfolio loans
acquired with deteriorated credit
quality |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loans and Leases at December 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
$ |
6,651 |
|
|
$ |
5,615 |
|
|
$ |
7,713 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
38,106 |
|
Portion of ending balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually
evaluated for
impairment |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
|
|
12,865 |
|
|
|
6,340 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
|
|
7,676 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
37,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
$ |
6,651 |
|
|
$ |
5,615 |
|
|
$ |
7,713 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
38,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans acquired with
deteriorated credit quality |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
C&I and CRE loans are either charged-off or written down to fair value at 90-days past due.
Automobile loans and other consumer loans are charged-off at 120-days past due. Home equity loans
are charged-off to fair value at 120-days past due. Residential mortgages are charged-off to fair
value at 150-days past due. Any loan in any portfolio may be charged-off prior to the policies
described above if a loss confirming event occurred. Loss confirming events include, but are not
limited to, bankruptcy (unsecured), continued delinquency, foreclosure, or receipt of an asset
valuation indicating a collateral deficiency and that asset is the sole source of repayment.
Credit Quality Indicators
To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality for C&I and CRE loans, and for purposes of
determining an appropriate ACL level for these loans, Huntington utilizes the following categories
of credit grades:
|
|
Pass = Higher quality loans that do not fit any of the other categories described below. |
|
|
OLEM = Potentially weak loans. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet represent a risk
given certain specific circumstances. If the potential weaknesses are not monitored or
mitigated, the asset may weaken or inadequately protect Huntingtons position in the future. |
|
|
Substandard = Inadequately protected loans by the borrowers ability to repay, equity, and/or
the collateral pledged to secure the loan. These loans have identified weaknesses that could
hinder normal repayment or collection of the debt. It is likely Huntington will sustain some
loss if any identified weaknesses are not mitigated. |
|
|
Doubtful = Loans that have all of the weaknesses inherent in those loans classified as
Substandard, with the added elements of the full collection of the loan is improbable and
that the possibility of loss is high. |
77
The categories above, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are
assigned upon initial approval of the loan or lease and subsequently updated as appropriate.
Commercial loans categorized as OLEM, Substandard, or Doubtful are considered Criticized
loans. Commercial loans categorized as Substandard or Doubtful are also considered Classified
loans.
For all classes within all consumer loan portfolios, each loan is assigned a specific PD
factor that is generally based on the borrowers most recent credit bureau score (FICO), which we
update quarterly. A FICO credit bureau score is a credit score developed by Fair Isaac Corporation
based on data provided by the credit bureaus. The FICO credit bureau score is the worlds most
used credit score and represents the standard measure of consumer credit risk used by lenders,
regulators, rating agencies, and consumers. The higher the FICO credit bureau score, the better
the odds of repayment and therefore, an indicator of lower credit risk.
78
The following table presents loan and lease balances by credit quality indicator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Pass |
|
|
OLEM |
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
Doubtful |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
3,359 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
3,861 |
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
8,757 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
12,116 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
13,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,695 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
Office |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791 |
|
Other commercial real estate |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,822 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
6,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1) |
|
|
|
750+ |
|
|
650-749 |
|
|
<650 |
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
2,606 |
|
|
$ |
2,371 |
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by UCS classification |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Pass |
|
|
OLEM |
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
Doubtful |
|
|
Total |
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
3,265 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
3,823 |
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
9,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
11,700 |
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
13,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,762 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
Office |
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
853 |
|
Other commercial real estate |
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,940 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
6,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by FICO score (1) |
|
|
|
750+ |
|
|
650-749 |
|
|
<650 |
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
2,516 |
|
|
$ |
2,267 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
5,615 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
2,224 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects currently updated customer credit scores. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects deferred fees and costs, loans in process, loans to legal entities, etc. |
79
Impaired Loans
For all classes within the C&I and CRE portfolios, all loans with an outstanding balance of $1
million or greater are evaluated on a quarterly basis for impairment. Generally, consumer loans
within any class are not individually evaluated on a regular basis for impairment.
Once a loan has been identified for an assessment of impairment, the loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. This determination
requires significant judgment and use of estimates, and the eventual outcome may differ
significantly from those estimates.
When a loan in any class has been determined to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is
measured using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans or leases
effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the observable market price of the loan or
lease, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan or lease is collateral dependent. When the
present value of expected future cash flows is used, the effective interest rate is the original
contractual interest rate of the loan adjusted for any premium or discount. When the contractual
interest rate is variable, the effective interest rate of the loan changes over time. A specific
reserve is established as a component of the ALLL when a loan has been determined to be impaired.
Subsequent to the initial measurement of impairment, if there is a significant change to the
impaired loans expected future cash flows, or if actual cash flows are significantly different
from the cash flows previously estimated, Huntington recalculates the impairment and appropriately
adjusts the specific reserve. Similarly, if Huntington measures impairment based on the observable
market price of an impaired loan or the fair value of the collateral of an impaired collateral
dependent loan, Huntington will adjust the specific reserve if there is a significant change in
either of those bases.
When a loan within any class is impaired, interest income is recognized unless the receipt of
principal and interest is in doubt when contractually due. If receipt of principal and interest is
in doubt when contractually due, interest income is not recognized. Cash receipts received on
nonaccruing impaired loans within any class are generally applied entirely against principal until
the loan or lease has been collected in full, after which time any additional cash receipts are
recognized as interest income. Cash receipts received on accruing impaired loans within any class
are applied in the same manner as accruing loans that are not considered impaired.
80
The following tables present impaired loan information: (1), (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Recognized |
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
|
$ |
42.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Multi family |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Office |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
50.3 |
|
|
$ |
96.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
65.2 |
|
|
$ |
82.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
72.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
141.5 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
116.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
167.5 |
|
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
116.0 |
|
|
$ |
178.8 |
|
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
87.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Office |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
287.9 |
|
|
$ |
400.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.2 |
|
|
$ |
259.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
342.0 |
|
|
|
360.6 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
338.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
26.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
|
$ |
49.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Multi family |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Office |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
142.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owner occupied |
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
Other commercial and
industrial |
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
154.4 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
173.2 |
|
|
$ |
239.7 |
|
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail properties |
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
120.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
Multi family |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Office |
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Industrial and warehouse |
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Other commercial real
estate |
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
104.4 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate |
|
$ |
241.3 |
|
|
$ |
339.3 |
|
|
$ |
65.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
Home equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by first-lien |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Secured by second-lien |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
334.2 |
|
|
|
347.6 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These tables do not include loans fully charged-off. |
|
(2) |
|
All automobile, home equity, residential mortgage, and other consumer
impaired loans are considered impaired due to their status as a TDR. |
82
4. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES
Listed below are the contractual maturities (under 1 year, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, and over 10
years) of available-for-sale and other securities at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March
31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
U.S. Treasury: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
52,264 |
|
|
|
51,453 |
|
|
|
52,425 |
|
|
|
51,781 |
|
|
|
49,997 |
|
|
|
50,185 |
|
6-10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury |
|
|
52,264 |
|
|
|
51,453 |
|
|
|
52,425 |
|
|
|
51,781 |
|
|
|
49,997 |
|
|
|
50,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agencies mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
48,832 |
|
|
|
48,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-10 years |
|
|
614,519 |
|
|
|
622,263 |
|
|
|
656,176 |
|
|
|
664,793 |
|
|
|
738,661 |
|
|
|
741,492 |
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
4,289,087 |
|
|
|
4,300,414 |
|
|
|
4,077,655 |
|
|
|
4,089,611 |
|
|
|
2,697,543 |
|
|
|
2,744,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Federal agencies mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4,952,438 |
|
|
|
4,971,085 |
|
|
|
4,733,831 |
|
|
|
4,754,404 |
|
|
|
3,436,204 |
|
|
|
3,486,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TLGP securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
156,044 |
|
|
|
157,196 |
|
|
|
156,450 |
|
|
|
157,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,230 |
|
|
|
25,536 |
|
|
|
663,486 |
|
|
|
665,236 |
|
6-10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TLGP securities |
|
|
156,044 |
|
|
|
157,196 |
|
|
|
181,680 |
|
|
|
183,467 |
|
|
|
663,486 |
|
|
|
665,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
183,405 |
|
|
|
184,672 |
|
|
|
158,273 |
|
|
|
159,288 |
|
|
|
158,208 |
|
|
|
159,865 |
|
1-5 years |
|
|
1,104,343 |
|
|
|
1,085,323 |
|
|
|
1,898,867 |
|
|
|
1,885,230 |
|
|
|
2,474,382 |
|
|
|
2,477,584 |
|
6-10 years |
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,515 |
|
|
|
13,082 |
|
|
|
13,359 |
|
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
10,667 |
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other agencies |
|
|
1,301,073 |
|
|
|
1,283,510 |
|
|
|
2,070,722 |
|
|
|
2,058,376 |
|
|
|
2,643,066 |
|
|
|
2,648,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Government backed agencies |
|
|
6,461,819 |
|
|
|
6,463,244 |
|
|
|
7,038,658 |
|
|
|
7,048,028 |
|
|
|
6,792,753 |
|
|
|
6,849,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
155,457 |
|
|
|
155,109 |
|
|
|
149,151 |
|
|
|
148,587 |
|
|
|
23,098 |
|
|
|
23,771 |
|
6-10 years |
|
|
112,665 |
|
|
|
113,888 |
|
|
|
124,552 |
|
|
|
125,656 |
|
|
|
103,904 |
|
|
|
106,844 |
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
170,903 |
|
|
|
170,295 |
|
|
|
182,341 |
|
|
|
181,472 |
|
|
|
298,242 |
|
|
|
300,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total municipal securities |
|
|
439,880 |
|
|
|
440,147 |
|
|
|
456,044 |
|
|
|
455,715 |
|
|
|
425,244 |
|
|
|
431,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private-label CMO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-10 years |
|
|
8,828 |
|
|
|
9,209 |
|
|
|
10,429 |
|
|
|
10,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
115,573 |
|
|
|
106,337 |
|
|
|
124,080 |
|
|
|
111,038 |
|
|
|
509,099 |
|
|
|
462,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private-label CMO |
|
|
124,401 |
|
|
|
115,546 |
|
|
|
134,509 |
|
|
|
121,925 |
|
|
|
509,099 |
|
|
|
462,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,669 |
|
|
|
19,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
662,319 |
|
|
|
665,316 |
|
|
|
697,001 |
|
|
|
700,749 |
|
|
|
543,444 |
|
|
|
546,371 |
|
6-10 years |
|
|
147,236 |
|
|
|
148,171 |
|
|
|
323,411 |
|
|
|
323,995 |
|
|
|
66,881 |
|
|
|
67,333 |
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
293,944 |
|
|
|
165,599 |
|
|
|
301,326 |
|
|
|
162,684 |
|
|
|
369,727 |
|
|
|
219,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset-backed securities (1) |
|
|
1,103,499 |
|
|
|
979,086 |
|
|
|
1,341,407 |
|
|
|
1,207,122 |
|
|
|
980,052 |
|
|
|
832,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
556,500 |
|
|
|
545,069 |
|
|
|
379,711 |
|
|
|
367,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total covered bonds |
|
|
556,500 |
|
|
|
545,069 |
|
|
|
379,711 |
|
|
|
367,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 years |
|
|
414,667 |
|
|
|
409,032 |
|
|
|
329,988 |
|
|
|
323,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total corporate debt |
|
|
414,667 |
|
|
|
409,032 |
|
|
|
329,988 |
|
|
|
323,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under 1 year |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
1-5 years |
|
|
7,861 |
|
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
7,810 |
|
|
|
8,009 |
|
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
6,855 |
|
6-10 years |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
Over 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities |
|
|
308,457 |
|
|
|
308,457 |
|
|
|
308,722 |
|
|
|
308,722 |
|
|
|
304,915 |
|
|
|
304,915 |
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
|
52,806 |
|
|
|
52,218 |
|
|
|
53,944 |
|
|
|
53,286 |
|
|
|
55,424 |
|
|
|
54,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
370,678 |
|
|
|
370,310 |
|
|
|
372,283 |
|
|
|
371,856 |
|
|
|
369,715 |
|
|
|
369,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale and other securities |
|
$ |
9,471,444 |
|
|
$ |
9,322,434 |
|
|
$ |
10,052,600 |
|
|
$ |
9,895,244 |
|
|
$ |
9,076,863 |
|
|
$ |
8,946,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 include automobile asset backed securities with a fair value of $331 million, $509 million and $475 million,
respectively which meet the eligibility requirements for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. |
83
Other securities at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 include $165.6
million of stock issued by the FHLB of Cincinnati, $37.4 million, $37.4 million, and $45.7 million,
respectively of stock issued by the FHLB of Indianapolis, and $105.5 million, $105.7 million and $
93.6 million, respectively, of Federal Reserve Bank stock. Other securities also include
corporate debt and marketable equity securities. Non-marketable equity securities are valued at
amortized cost. At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, Huntington did not have
any material equity positions in FNMA or FHLMC.
The following tables provide amortized cost, fair value, and gross unrealized gains and losses
recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income by investment category at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
52,264 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(811 |
) |
|
$ |
51,453 |
|
Federal Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4,952,438 |
|
|
|
61,338 |
|
|
|
(42,691 |
) |
|
|
4,971,085 |
|
TLGP securities |
|
|
156,044 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,196 |
|
Other agencies |
|
|
1,301,073 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
(19,604 |
) |
|
|
1,283,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Government
backed securities |
|
|
6,461,819 |
|
|
|
64,531 |
|
|
|
(63,106 |
) |
|
|
6,463,244 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
439,880 |
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
(5,785 |
) |
|
|
440,147 |
|
Private-label CMO |
|
|
124,401 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(10,243 |
) |
|
|
115,546 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,103,499 |
|
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
(129,267 |
) |
|
|
979,086 |
|
Covered bonds |
|
|
556,500 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
(11,588 |
) |
|
|
545,069 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
414,667 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(5,749 |
) |
|
|
409,032 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
370,678 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
370,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale and other securities |
|
$ |
9,471,444 |
|
|
$ |
77,485 |
|
|
$ |
(226,495 |
) |
|
$ |
9,322,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
52,425 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
|
$ |
51,781 |
|
Federal Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4,733,831 |
|
|
|
71,901 |
|
|
|
(51,328 |
) |
|
|
4,754,404 |
|
TLGP securities |
|
|
181,680 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,467 |
|
Other agencies |
|
|
2,070,722 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
(17,220 |
) |
|
|
2,058,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Government
backed securities |
|
|
7,038,658 |
|
|
|
78,562 |
|
|
|
(69,192 |
) |
|
|
7,048,028 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
456,044 |
|
|
|
6,154 |
|
|
|
(6,483 |
) |
|
|
455,715 |
|
Private-label CMO |
|
|
134,509 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
(13,820 |
) |
|
|
121,925 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,341,407 |
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
|
(140,848 |
) |
|
|
1,207,122 |
|
Covered bonds |
|
|
379,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,502 |
) |
|
|
367,209 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
329,988 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(6,623 |
) |
|
|
323,389 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
372,283 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
371,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale and other securities |
|
$ |
10,052,600 |
|
|
$ |
92,903 |
|
|
$ |
(250,259 |
) |
|
$ |
9,895,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
49,997 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,185 |
|
Federal Agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,436,204 |
|
|
|
55,747 |
|
|
|
(5,537 |
) |
|
|
3,486,414 |
|
TLGP securities |
|
|
663,486 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
665,236 |
|
Other agencies |
|
|
2,643,066 |
|
|
|
6,841 |
|
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
2,648,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Government
backed securities |
|
|
6,792,753 |
|
|
|
65,036 |
|
|
|
(7,838 |
) |
|
|
6,849,951 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
425,244 |
|
|
|
6,282 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
431,442 |
|
Private-label CMO |
|
|
509,099 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
(46,588 |
) |
|
|
462,731 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
980,052 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
(150,719 |
) |
|
|
832,783 |
|
Covered bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
369,715 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
369,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale and other securities |
|
$ |
9,076,863 |
|
|
$ |
75,289 |
|
|
$ |
(205,788 |
) |
|
$ |
8,946,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables provide detail on investment securities with unrealized losses aggregated
by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous loss
position, at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Over 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands ) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
51,453 |
|
|
$ |
(811 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,453 |
|
|
$ |
(811 |
) |
Federal agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,799,899 |
|
|
|
(42,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,799,899 |
|
|
|
(42,691 |
) |
TLGP securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other agencies |
|
|
964,978 |
|
|
|
(19,485 |
) |
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
975,536 |
|
|
|
(19,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S.
Government backed securities |
|
|
2,816,330 |
|
|
|
(62,987 |
) |
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
2,826,888 |
|
|
|
(63,106 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
200,747 |
|
|
|
(5,649 |
) |
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
204,431 |
|
|
|
(5,785 |
) |
Private-label CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,798 |
|
|
|
(10,243 |
) |
|
|
82,798 |
|
|
|
(10,243 |
) |
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
114,375 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
152,715 |
|
|
|
(128,501 |
) |
|
|
267,090 |
|
|
|
(129,267 |
) |
Covered bonds |
|
|
421,634 |
|
|
|
(11,588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,634 |
|
|
|
(11,588 |
) |
Corporate debt |
|
|
374,199 |
|
|
|
(5,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374,199 |
|
|
|
(5,749 |
) |
Other securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
3,927,289 |
|
|
$ |
(86,740 |
) |
|
$ |
252,545 |
|
|
$ |
(139,755 |
) |
|
$ |
4,179,834 |
|
|
$ |
(226,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Over 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands ) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
51,781 |
|
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,781 |
|
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
Federal agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,424,431 |
|
|
|
(51,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,424,431 |
|
|
|
(51,328 |
) |
TLGP securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other agencies |
|
|
1,217,074 |
|
|
|
(17,134 |
) |
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
1,221,845 |
|
|
|
(17,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S.
Government backed securities |
|
|
2,693,286 |
|
|
|
(69,106 |
) |
|
|
4,771 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
2,698,057 |
|
|
|
(69,192 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
201,370 |
|
|
|
(6,363 |
) |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
205,070 |
|
|
|
(6,483 |
) |
Private-label CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,617 |
|
|
|
(13,820 |
) |
|
|
85,617 |
|
|
|
(13,820 |
) |
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
214,983 |
|
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
146,866 |
|
|
|
(138,719 |
) |
|
|
361,849 |
|
|
|
(140,848 |
) |
Covered bonds |
|
|
367,209 |
|
|
|
(12,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,209 |
|
|
|
(12,502 |
) |
Corporate debt |
|
|
288,660 |
|
|
|
(6,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,660 |
|
|
|
(6,623 |
) |
Other securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,218 |
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
41,218 |
|
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
3,765,508 |
|
|
$ |
(96,723 |
) |
|
$ |
282,172 |
|
|
$ |
(153,536 |
) |
|
$ |
4,047,680 |
|
|
$ |
(250,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Over 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands ) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Federal agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
793,110 |
|
|
|
(5,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793,110 |
|
|
|
(5,537 |
) |
TLGP securities |
|
|
304,272 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,272 |
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
Other agencies |
|
|
975,445 |
|
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
4,669 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
980,114 |
|
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Government
backed securities |
|
|
2,072,827 |
|
|
|
(7,813 |
) |
|
|
4,669 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
2,077,496 |
|
|
|
(7,838 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3,820 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
Private-label CMO |
|
|
17,122 |
|
|
|
(2,213 |
) |
|
|
457,082 |
|
|
|
(44,375 |
) |
|
|
474,204 |
|
|
|
(46,588 |
) |
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
99,863 |
|
|
|
(8,080 |
) |
|
|
348,950 |
|
|
|
(142,639 |
) |
|
|
448,813 |
|
|
|
(150,719 |
) |
Covered bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities |
|
|
39,686 |
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
40,882 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
2,233,498 |
|
|
$ |
(18,529 |
) |
|
$ |
815,717 |
|
|
$ |
(187,259 |
) |
|
$ |
3,049,215 |
|
|
$ |
(205,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table is a summary of realized securities gains and losses for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Gross gains on sales of securities |
|
$ |
6,735 |
|
|
$ |
6,776 |
|
Gross (losses) on sales of securities |
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sales of securities |
|
|
4,205 |
|
|
|
6,430 |
|
Net OTTI recorded |
|
|
(4,165 |
) |
|
|
(6,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities gain (loss) |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Impairment
Huntington evaluates its investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for OTTI.
Huntington assesses whether OTTI has occurred when the fair value of a debt security is less than
the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Under these circumstances, OTTI is considered
to have occurred; (1) if Huntington intends to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not
Huntington will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or
(3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized
cost basis.
For securities Huntington does not expect to sell or it is not more likely than not to be
required to sell, credit-related OTTI, represented by the expected loss in principal, is recognized
in earnings, while noncredit-related OTTI is recognized in other
comprehensive income (OCI). For securities which Huntington does expect to sell, all OTTI is
recognized in earnings. Noncredit-related OTTI results from other factors, including increased
liquidity spreads and extension of the security. Presentation of OTTI is made in the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income on a gross basis with a reduction for the amount of
OTTI recognized in OCI.
86
Huntington applied the related OTTI guidance on the debt security types listed below.
Alt-A mortgage-backed and private-label CMO securities are collateralized by
first-lien residential mortgage loans. The securities are valued by a third party specialist using
a discounted cash flow approach and proprietary pricing model. The model uses inputs such as
estimated prepayment speeds, losses, recoveries, default rates that are implied by the underlying
performance of collateral in the structure or similar structures, discount rates that are implied
by market prices for similar securities, collateral structure types, and house price depreciation /
appreciation rates that are based upon macroeconomic forecasts.
Pooled-trust-preferred securities are CDOs backed by a pool of debt securities issued
by financial institutions. The collateral generally consists of trust-preferred securities and
subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank holding companies, and insurance companies. A
full cash flow analysis is used to estimate fair values and assess impairment for each security
within this portfolio. We engaged a third party specialist with direct industry experience in
pooled-trust-preferred securities valuations to provide assistance in estimating the fair value and
expected cash flows for each security in this portfolio. Relying on cash flows is necessary because
there was a lack of observable transactions in the market and many of the original sponsors or
dealers for these securities are no longer able to provide a fair value that is compliant with ASC
820.
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, the following tables summarizes by
debt security type, total OTTI losses, OTTI losses included in OCI, and OTTI recognized in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for securities evaluated for impairment as
described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Pooled- |
|
|
Private- |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
trust-preferred |
|
|
label CMO |
|
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OTTI recoveries (losses) (unrealized and
realized) |
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
$ |
6,397 |
|
|
$ |
2,375 |
|
|
$ |
9,876 |
|
Unrealized OTTI
(recoveries) losses
recognized in OCI |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
(9,604 |
) |
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
|
|
(14,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,207 |
) |
|
$ |
(787 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
Pooled- |
|
|
Private- |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
trust-preferred |
|
|
label CMO |
|
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total OTTI (losses) recoveries (unrealized and
realized) |
|
$ |
(4,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(649 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,175 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,400 |
) |
Unrealized OTTI
losses (recoveries)
recognized in OCI |
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
$ |
(642 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,215 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,604 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table rolls forward the unrealized OTTI recognized in OCI on debt securities
held by Huntington for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
100,838 |
|
|
$ |
124,408 |
|
Reductions from sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
losses not previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,123 |
|
Change in expected cash flows |
|
|
(14,041 |
) |
|
|
(8,146 |
) |
Additional credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
86,797 |
|
|
$ |
126,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
The following table rolls forward the OTTI recognized in earnings on debt securities held by
Huntington for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
54,536 |
|
|
$ |
53,801 |
|
Reductions from sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
Credit losses not previously recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
Additional credit losses |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
5,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
58,701 |
|
|
$ |
57,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of these assets have been impacted by various market conditions. The
unrealized losses were primarily the result of wider liquidity spreads on asset-backed securities
and, increased market volatility on nonagency mortgage and asset-backed securities that are
collateralized by certain mortgage loans. In addition, the expected average lives of the
asset-backed securities backed by trust-preferred securities have been extended, due to changes in
the expectations of when the underlying securities would be repaid. The contractual terms and / or
cash flows of the investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less
than the amortized cost. Huntington does not intend to sell, nor does it believe it will be
required to sell these securities until the fair value is recovered, which may be maturity and,
therefore, does not consider them to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2011, Management has evaluated all other investment securities with unrealized
losses and all non-marketable securities for impairment and concluded no additional OTTI is
required.
5. LOAN SALES AND SECURITIZATIONS
Residential Mortgage Loans
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, Huntington sold $1.3 billion and
$0.7 billion of residential mortgage loans with servicing retained, resulting in net pretax gains
of $32.7 million and $14.8 million, respectively, recorded in other noninterest income.
A MSR is established only when the servicing is contractually separated from the underlying
mortgage loans by sale or securitization of the loans with servicing rights retained. At initial
recognition, the MSR asset is established at its fair value using assumptions consistent with
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of existing MSRs carried at fair value in the
portfolio. At the time of initial capitalization, MSRs are grouped into one of two categories
depending on whether or not Huntington intends to actively hedge the asset. MSR assets are
recorded using the fair value method if Huntington will actively engage in hedging the asset and
recorded using the amortization method if no active hedging will be performed. MSRs are included
in accrued income and other assets. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of MSRs carried
under the fair value method, as well as amortization or impairment of MSRs recorded using the
amortization method, is recorded as an increase or decrease in mortgage banking income, which is
included in noninterest income.
The following tables summarize the changes in MSRs recorded using either the fair value method
or the amortization method for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Fair Value Method: |
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Fair value, beginning of period |
|
$ |
125,679 |
|
|
$ |
176,427 |
|
Change in fair value during the period due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time decay (1) |
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
(1,672 |
) |
Payoffs (2) |
|
|
(5,872 |
) |
|
|
(6,877 |
) |
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (3) |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
(5,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, end of period |
|
$ |
119,207 |
|
|
$ |
162,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents decrease in value due to passage of time, including the impact from both regularly scheduled loan principal payments and partial loan paydowns. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents decrease in value associated with loans that paid off during the period. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents change in value resulting primarily from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment spreads. |
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Amortization Method: |
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Carrying value, beginning of year |
|
$ |
70,516 |
|
|
$ |
38,165 |
|
New servicing assets created |
|
|
15,453 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
Amortization and other |
|
|
(2,617 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value, end of period |
|
$ |
83,352 |
|
|
$ |
45,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, end of period |
|
$ |
100,438 |
|
|
$ |
49,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of
MSRs occur, the precise terms and conditions are typically not readily available. Therefore, the
fair value of MSRs is estimated using a discounted future cash flow model. The model considers
portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees and assumptions related to
prepayments, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, costs to service, and other
economic factors. Changes in the assumptions used may have a significant impact on the valuation
of MSRs.
A summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the MSR value at March 31, 2011, to
changes in these assumptions follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decline in fair value due to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adverse |
|
|
adverse |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Actual |
|
|
change |
|
|
change |
|
Constant prepayment rate |
|
|
10.27 |
% |
|
$ |
(7,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,495 |
) |
Spread over forward interest rate swap rates |
| |
514 |
bps |
|
|
(2,674 |
) |
|
|
(5,348 |
) |
MSR values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing
income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can
be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. Huntington hedges the fair value portfolio of
MSRs against changes in value attributable to changes in interest rates through a combination of
derivative instruments and trading securities.
Total servicing fees included in mortgage banking income amounted to $12.5 million and $12.4
million for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
6. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
A rollforward of goodwill by business segment for the three-month periods ended March 31,
2011, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail & |
|
|
Regional & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury/ |
|
|
Huntington |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
AFCRE |
|
|
WGH |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
286,824 |
|
|
$ |
16,169 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,951 |
|
|
$ |
42,324 |
|
|
$ |
444,268 |
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
286,824 |
|
|
$ |
16,169 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98,951 |
|
|
$ |
42,324 |
|
|
$ |
444,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis at October 1st of
each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. No events or changes in circumstances since the October 1, 2010, annual impairment
test were noted that would indicate it was more likely than not a goodwill impairment exists.
89
At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, Huntingtons other intangible assets
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
$ |
376,846 |
|
|
$ |
(230,339 |
) |
|
$ |
146,507 |
|
Customer relationship |
|
|
104,574 |
|
|
|
(36,831 |
) |
|
|
67,743 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,164 |
|
|
|
(24,163 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
506,584 |
|
|
$ |
(291,333 |
) |
|
$ |
215,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
$ |
376,846 |
|
|
$ |
(219,311 |
) |
|
$ |
157,535 |
|
Customer relationship |
|
|
104,574 |
|
|
|
(34,751 |
) |
|
|
69,823 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,164 |
|
|
|
(23,902 |
) |
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
506,584 |
|
|
$ |
(277,964 |
) |
|
$ |
228,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
$ |
376,846 |
|
|
$ |
(181,320 |
) |
|
$ |
195,526 |
|
Customer relationship |
|
|
104,574 |
|
|
|
(28,193 |
) |
|
|
76,381 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,164 |
|
|
|
(23,119 |
) |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
506,584 |
|
|
$ |
(232,632 |
) |
|
$ |
273,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated amortization expense of other intangible assets for the remainder of 2011 and
the next five years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Expense |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
39,952 |
|
2012 |
|
|
46,075 |
|
2013 |
|
|
40,511 |
|
2014 |
|
|
35,858 |
|
2015 |
|
|
19,758 |
|
2016 |
|
|
6,606 |
|
90
7. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of other comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011,
and 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Pretax |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold |
|
$ |
14,041 |
|
|
$ |
(4,914 |
) |
|
$ |
9,127 |
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising
during the period |
|
|
(5,725 |
) |
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
(3,750 |
) |
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
8,276 |
|
|
|
(2,925 |
) |
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising
during the period |
|
|
(22,188 |
) |
|
|
7,766 |
|
|
|
(14,422 |
) |
Change in pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets and liabilities |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(9,842 |
) |
|
$ |
3,417 |
|
|
$ |
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Pretax |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
After-tax |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for consolidation of variable interest
entities |
|
$ |
(6,365 |
) |
|
$ |
2,116 |
|
|
$ |
(4,249 |
) |
Noncredit-related impairment recoveries (losses) on debt securities not expected to be sold |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities arising
during the period |
|
|
37,927 |
|
|
|
(13,404 |
) |
|
|
24,523 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
36,019 |
|
|
|
(12,736 |
) |
|
|
23,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale equity securities |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships arising
during the period |
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
3,298 |
|
Change in pension and post-retirement benefit plan assets and liabilities |
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
36,543 |
|
|
$ |
(13,031 |
) |
|
$ |
23,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
gains and |
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains and |
|
|
gains and |
|
|
(losses) on |
|
|
for pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) on |
|
|
(losses) on |
|
|
cash flow |
|
|
and other post- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
debt |
|
|
equity |
|
|
hedging |
|
|
retirement |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
derivatives |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(103,060 |
) |
|
$ |
(322 |
) |
|
$ |
58,865 |
|
|
$ |
(112,468 |
) |
|
$ |
(156,985 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle for
consolidation of variable
interest entities |
|
|
(4,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,249 |
) |
Period change |
|
|
23,283 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
27,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(84,026 |
) |
|
$ |
(308 |
) |
|
$ |
62,163 |
|
|
$ |
(111,302 |
) |
|
$ |
(133,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(101,290 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
35,710 |
|
|
|
(131,489 |
) |
|
$ |
(197,496 |
) |
Period change |
|
|
5,351 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(14,422 |
) |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(95,939 |
) |
|
$ |
(381 |
) |
|
$ |
21,288 |
|
|
$ |
(128,889 |
) |
|
$ |
(203,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Repurchase of Outstanding TARP Capital and Warrant to Repurchase Common Stock
In 2008, Huntington received $1.4 billion of equity capital by issuing to the Treasury 1.4
million shares of TARP Capital and a ten-year warrant to purchase up to 23.6 million shares of
Huntingtons common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at an exercise price of $8.90 per share. As
approved by the Federal Reserve Board, the Treasury, and our other banking regulators, on December
22, 2010, Huntington repurchased all 1.4 million shares of our TARP Capital held by the Treasury
totaling $1.4 billion. Huntington used the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock discussed
below and $300 million of 7.00% Subordinated Notes due 2020 and other funds to redeem the TARP
Capital. On January 19, 2011, Huntington repurchased the warrant originally issued to the Treasury
for a purchase price of $49.1 million.
Share Repurchase Program
Huntington did not repurchase any shares for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
As a condition to participate in the TARP, Huntington could not have repurchased any additional
shares without prior approval from the Treasury.
9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is the amount of earnings (adjusted for dividends declared on
preferred stock) available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period.
Diluted earnings per share is the amount of earnings available to each share of common stock
outstanding during the reporting period adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive
common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares include incremental shares issued for stock
options, restricted stock units and awards, distributions from deferred compensation plans, and the
conversion of Huntingtons convertible preferred stock. Potentially dilutive common shares are
excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which the effect would be
antidilutive. For diluted earnings per share, net income available to common shares can be
affected by the conversion of Huntingtons convertible preferred stock. Where the effect of this
conversion would be dilutive, net income available to common shareholders is adjusted by the
associated preferred dividends and deemed dividend. The calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per share for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010 was as follows:
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividend and accretion of discount |
|
|
(7,703 |
) |
|
|
(29,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
118,743 |
|
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
Average common shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
863,359 |
|
|
|
716,320 |
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
118,743 |
|
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
Effect of assumed preferred stock conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
118,743 |
|
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
Average common shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
863,359 |
|
|
|
716,320 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock units and awards |
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
Shares held in deferred compensation plans |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive potential common shares: |
|
|
3,878 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted average common shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
867,237 |
|
|
|
718,593 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Approximately 14.7 million and 21.1 million options to purchase shares of common stock
outstanding at the end of March 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive. The weighted
average exercise price for these options was $20.71 per share and $18.46 per share at the end of
each respective period.
10. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Huntington sponsors nonqualified and incentive share based compensation plans. These plans
provide for the granting of stock options and other awards to officers, directors, and other
employees. Compensation costs are included in personnel costs on the Consolidated Statements of
Income. Stock options are granted at the closing market price on the date of the grant. Options
granted typically vest ratably over three years or when other conditions are met. Options granted
prior to May 2004 have a term of ten years. All options granted after May 2004 have a term of seven
years.
Huntington uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value share-based compensation
expense. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical rates and reduce the
compensation expense recognized. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based on the estimated volatility of
Huntingtons stock over the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on
the dividend rate and stock price at the date of the grant. The following table illustrates the
weighted-average assumptions used in the option-pricing model for options granted in the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
Expected volatility of Huntingtons common stock |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
Expected option term (years) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
93
The following table illustrates total share-based compensation expense and related tax benefit
for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
3,625 |
|
|
$ |
2,933 |
|
Tax benefit |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
Huntingtons stock option activity and related information for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2011, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
(amounts in thousands, except years and per share amounts) |
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
21,862 |
|
|
$ |
15.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
6.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/expired |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
14.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
21,245 |
|
|
$ |
16.01 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
8,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2011 (1) |
|
|
20,920 |
|
|
$ |
16.16 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
16,481 |
|
|
$ |
19.03 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of options expected to
vest includes an estimate of expected forfeitures. |
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair value of underlying
stock exceeds the in-the-money option exercise price. For the three-month period ended March 31,
2011, cash received for the exercises of stock options was $0.1 million and the tax benefit
realized from stock option exercises was less than $0.1 million. There were no exercises of stock
options for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010.
Huntington also grants restricted stock units and awards. Restricted stock units and awards
are issued at no cost to the recipient, and can be settled only in shares at the end of the vesting
period. Restricted stock awards provide the holder with full voting rights and cash dividends
during the vesting period. Restricted stock units do not provide the holder with voting rights or
cash dividends during the vesting period, but do accrue a dividend equivalent that is paid upon
vesting, and are subject to certain service restrictions. The fair value of the restricted stock
units and awards is the closing market price of the Huntingtons common stock on the date of award.
The following table summarizes the status of Huntingtons restricted stock units and
restricted stock awards as of March 31, 2011, and activity for the three-month periods ended March
31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Units |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Awards (1) |
|
|
Per Share |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
$ |
5.78 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
Granted |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
9.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
6,087 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes restricted stock awards granted under the Second Amended and Restated 2007 Stock and Long-Term
Incentive Plan to certain executives as a portion of their annual base salary. These awards are 100% vested as of
the grant date and are not subject to any requirement of future service. However, the shares are subject to
restrictions regarding sale, transfer, pledge, or disposition until certain conditions are met. |
The weighted-average grant date fair value of nonvested shares granted for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, were $7.50, and $4.62, respectively. The total fair value
of awards vested was $0.2 million during the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, the total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested awards was $22.2 million with a weighted-average expense
recognition period of 1.6 years.
94
Of the remaining 44.1 million shares of common stock authorized for issuance at March 31,
2011, 27.8 million were outstanding and 16.3 million were available for future grants. Huntington
issues shares to fulfill stock option exercises and restricted stock units from available
authorized shares. At March 31, 2011, Management believes there are adequate authorized shares
available to satisfy anticipated stock option exercises in 2011.
11. BENEFIT PLANS
Huntington sponsors the Plan, a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering
substantially all employees hired or rehired prior to January 1, 2010. The Plan provides benefits
based upon length of service and compensation levels. The funding policy of Huntington is to
contribute an annual amount that is at least equal to the minimum funding requirements but not more
than that deductible under the Internal Revenue Code. There is no required minimum contribution for
2011. Although not required, Huntington made a $50 million contribution to the Plan in March 2011.
In addition, Huntington has an unfunded defined benefit post-retirement plan that provides
certain healthcare and life insurance benefits to retired employees who have attained the age of 55
and have at least 10 years of vesting service under this plan. For any employee retiring on or
after January 1, 1993, post-retirement healthcare benefits are based upon the employees number of
months of service and are limited to the actual cost of coverage. Life insurance benefits are a
percentage of the employees base salary at the time of retirement, with a maximum of $50,000 of
coverage. The employer paid portion of the post-retirement health and life insurance plan was
eliminated for employees retiring on and after March 1, 2010. Eligible employees retiring on and
after March 1, 2010, who elect retiree medical coverage, will pay the full cost of this coverage.
Huntington will not provide any employer paid life insurance to employees retiring on and after
March 1, 2010. Eligible employees will be able to convert or port their existing life insurance at
their own expense under the same terms that are available to all terminated employees.
Beginning January 1, 2010, there were changes to the way the future early and normal
retirement benefit is calculated under the Plan for service on and after January 1, 2010. While
these changes did not affect the benefit earned under the Plan through December 31, 2009, there was
a reduction in future benefits. In addition, employees hired or rehired on and after January 1,
2010, are not eligible to participate in the Plan.
The following table shows the components of net periodic benefit expense of the Plan and the
Post-Retirement Benefit Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Post Retirement Benefits |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
5,413 |
|
|
$ |
5,051 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,518 |
|
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(10,823 |
) |
|
|
(10,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of transition asset |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(1,442 |
) |
|
|
(1,442 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
Amortization of gains |
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit expense |
|
$ |
8,289 |
|
|
$ |
5,772 |
|
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank, as trustee, held all Plan assets at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The Plan
assets consisted of investments in a variety of Huntington mutual funds and Huntington common stock
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
(in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington funds money market |
|
|
24,649 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington funds fixed income funds |
|
|
143,813 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
133,330 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Equities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington funds |
|
|
339,003 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
318,155 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Other equity mutual funds |
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington common stock |
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
26,969 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
$ |
537,885 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
478,479 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
Investments of the Plan are accounted for at cost on the trade date and are reported at fair
value. All of the Plans investments at March 31, 2011, are classified as Level 1 within the fair
value hierarchy. In general, investments of the Plan are exposed to various risks, such as
interest rate risk, credit risk, and overall market volatility. Due to the level of risk
associated with certain investments, it is reasonably possible changes in the values of investments
will occur in the near term and such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the
Plan assets.
The investment objective of the Plan is to maximize the return on Plan assets over a long time
period, while meeting the Plan obligations. At March 31, 2011, Plan assets were invested 69% in
equity investments and 31% in bonds, with an average duration of 3.6 years on bond investments.
Although it may fluctuate with market conditions, Management has targeted a long-term allocation of
Plan assets of 69% in equity investments and 31% in bond investments.
Huntington also sponsors other nonqualified retirement plans, the most significant being the
SERP and the SRIP. The SERP provides certain former officers and directors, and the SRIP provides
certain current officers and directors of Huntington and its subsidiaries with defined pension
benefits in excess of limits imposed by federal tax law. The cost of providing these plans was
$0.7 million for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010.
Huntington has a defined contribution plan that is available to eligible employees. In the
2009 first quarter, the Plan was amended to eliminate employer matching contributions effective on
or after March 15, 2009. Prior to March 15, 2009, Huntington matched participant contributions, up
to the first 3% of base pay contributed to the Plan. Half of the employee contribution was matched
on the 4th and 5th percent of base pay contributed to the Plan. Effective May 1, 2010, Huntington
reinstated the employer matching contribution to the defined contribution Plan. The cost of
providing the Plan for the 2011 first quarter was $3.7 million and there was no expense for the
2010 first quarter.
12. FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Huntington follows the fair value accounting guidance under ASC 820 and ASC 825.
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A
three-level valuation hierarchy was established for disclosure of fair value measurements. The
valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or
liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets
or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Transfers in and out of
Level 1, 2, or 3 are recorded at fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.
96
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at
fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation
hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instrument |
|
Hierarchy |
|
Valuation methodology |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Huntington elected to
apply the fair value
option for mortgage loans
originated with the
intent to sell which are
included in loans held
for sale. Mortgage loans
held for sale are
estimated using security
prices for similar
product types. At March
31, 2011, mortgage loans
held for sale had an
aggregate fair value of
$162.8 million and an
aggregate outstanding
principal balance of
$157.9 million. Interest
income on these loans is
recorded in interest and
fee income loans and
leases. Included in
mortgage banking income
were net gains resulting
from origination and sale
of these loans, including
net realized gains of
$32.8 million and $15.1
million for the
three-month periods ended
March 31, 2011, and 2010,
respectively. Of such
gains, the change in fair
value while held as loans
were $6.1 million and
$2.4 million for the
three-month periods ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale Securities &
Trading Account Securities
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Consist primarily of U.S.
Treasury and money market
mutual funds, which have
quoted prices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Consist of U.S.
Government and agency
mortgage-backed and other
agency securities,
municipal securities, and
other securities for
which an active market is
not available. Third
party pricing services
provide a fair value
estimate based upon
trades of similar
financial instruments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Consist of certain
asset-backed securities,
pooled-trust-preferred
securities, private-label
CMOs, and municipal
securities for which fair
value is estimated.
Assumptions used to
determine the fair value
of these securities have
greater subjectivity due
to the lack of observable
market transactions.
Generally, there are only
limited trades of similar
instruments and a
discounted cash flow
approach is used to
determine fair value. |
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Consists of automobile
loan receivables measured
at fair value. The key
assumptions used to
determine the fair value
of the automobile loan
receivables included
projections of expected
losses and prepayment of
the underlying loans in
the portfolio and a
market assumption of
interest rate spreads.
The net gains and losses,
before tax, from fair
value changes reflected
in interest and fee
income other and
noninterest income for
the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 was $(2.5) million
and $7.6 million,
respectively, which is
net of a $0.1 million and
$0.5 million,
respectively net gain
associated with
instrument specific
credit risk. Instrument
specific credit risk was
determined based on
estimated credit losses
inherent in the beginning
period fair value
calculation as compared
to actual credit losses
incurred during the
period plus estimated
credit losses inherent in
the end of period fair
value calculation. |
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs
|
|
Level 3
|
|
MSRs do not trade in an
active, open market with
readily observable
prices. Although sales
of MSRs do occur, the
precise terms and
conditions typically are
not readily available.
Fair value is determined
on an income approach
model based upon
month-end interest rate
curve and prepayment
assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Consist of exchange
traded options and
forward commitments to
deliver mortgage-backed
securities which are
valued using quoted
prices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Consist of basic asset
and liability conversion
swaps and options, and
interest rate caps. These
derivative positions are
valued using a discounted
cash flow method that
incorporates current
market interest rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Consist primarily of
interest rate lock
agreements related to
mortgage loan
commitments. The
determination of fair
value includes
assumptions related to
the likelihood that a
commitment will
ultimately result in a
closed loan, which is a
significant unobservable
assumption. |
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization trust notes
payable
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Consists of certain
securitization trust
notes payable related to
the automobile loans
measured at fair value.
The notes payable are
valued based on interest
rates for similar
financial instruments.
The net gains and losses,
before tax, from fair
value changes reflected
in interest expense -
subordinated notes and
other long-term debt and
noninterest income for
the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 was $(2.2) million
and $3.7 million,
respectively. |
97
Assets and Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2011, December
31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Balance at |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Adjustments (1) |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,768 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
Federal agencies: Other agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,742 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,398 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
75,610 |
|
|
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,610 |
|
|
|
88,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale and other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
51,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,453 |
|
Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,971,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,971,085 |
|
TLGP securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,196 |
|
Federal agencies: Other agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283,510 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,871 |
|
|
|
135,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,147 |
|
Private-label CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,546 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
813,487 |
|
|
|
165,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979,086 |
|
Covered bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,069 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,032 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
52,218 |
|
|
|
9,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,671 |
|
|
|
8,493,885 |
|
|
|
416,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,013,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,851 |
|
MSRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,207 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
294,166 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
(50,070 |
) |
|
|
251,205 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization trust notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,905 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
183,993 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,569 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Balance at |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Adjustments (1) |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
754,117 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
754,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
47,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,430 |
|
Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,860 |
|
Federal agencies: Other agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,853 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,205 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
69,017 |
|
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,447 |
|
|
|
68,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale and other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
51,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,781 |
|
Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,754,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,754,404 |
|
TLGP securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,467 |
|
Federal agencies: Other agencies (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,058,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,058,376 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,909 |
|
|
|
149,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,715 |
|
Private-label CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,925 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044,438 |
|
|
|
162,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,122 |
|
Covered bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,209 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,389 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
53,286 |
|
|
|
9,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,067 |
|
|
|
9,047,040 |
|
|
|
434,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,586,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522,717 |
|
MSRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,679 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
23,514 |
|
|
|
390,361 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
(70,559 |
) |
|
|
346,133 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization trust notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,089 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
233,399 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,240 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Amounts were transferred from Level 1 to Level
2 in the 2010 fourth quarter due to lack of
sufficient market activity for these securities. |
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
Netting |
|
|
Balance at |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Adjustments (1) |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
319,166 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
319,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
49,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,977 |
|
Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,561 |
|
Federal agencies: Other agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,262 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
60,547 |
|
|
|
5,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,524 |
|
|
|
39,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale and other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
50,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,185 |
|
Federal agencies: Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,486,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,486,414 |
|
TLGP securities |
|
|
665,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,236 |
|
Federal agencies: Other agencies |
|
|
2,620,700 |
|
|
|
27,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,648,116 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,845 |
|
|
|
318,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,442 |
|
Private-label CMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,731 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,704 |
|
|
|
219,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832,783 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
55,261 |
|
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,391,382 |
|
|
|
4,249,660 |
|
|
|
1,000,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,641,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
546,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730,508 |
|
MSRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,106 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
346,865 |
|
|
|
3,301 |
|
|
|
(53,458 |
) |
|
|
297,961 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization trust notes payable |
|
|
573,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,018 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
232,216 |
|
|
|
4,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,072 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow
the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the
same counterparties. |
99
The tables below present a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, for financial instruments measured on a recurring basis and
classified as Level 3. The classification of an item as Level 3 is based on the significance of the
unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, Level 3 measurements may also
include observable components of value that can be validated externally. Accordingly, the gains and
losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are
part of the valuation methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
Private- |
|
|
backed |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Equity |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
MSRs |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
securities |
|
|
label CMO |
|
|
securities |
|
|
loans |
|
|
investments |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
125,679 |
|
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
$ |
149,806 |
|
|
$ |
121,925 |
|
|
$ |
162,684 |
|
|
$ |
522,717 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total gains / losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(6,472 |
) |
|
|
(1,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
|
|
(2,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Included in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
10,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(14,530 |
) |
|
|
(9,664 |
) |
|
|
(4,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in / out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
119,207 |
|
|
$ |
(832 |
) |
|
$ |
135,276 |
|
|
$ |
115,546 |
|
|
$ |
165,599 |
|
|
$ |
458,851 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains
or losses for the period
included in earnings
(or OCI) attributable to the
change in unrealized gains or
losses relating to assets still
held at reporting date |
|
$ |
(6,472 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,798 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
|
$ |
10,297 |
|
|
$ |
(2,511 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
Private- |
|
|
backed |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Equity |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
MSRs |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
securities |
|
|
label CMO |
|
|
securities |
|
|
loans |
|
|
investments |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
176,427 |
|
|
$ |
(4,236 |
) |
|
$ |
11,515 |
|
|
$ |
477,319 |
|
|
$ |
407,098 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,872 |
|
Total gains / losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(14,321 |
) |
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
(4,050 |
) |
|
|
5,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,690 |
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(16,555 |
) |
|
|
(23,188 |
) |
|
|
(2,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in / out of Level 3 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184,073 |
) |
|
|
180,019 |
|
|
|
(25,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
162,106 |
|
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
|
$ |
318,597 |
|
|
$ |
462,731 |
|
|
$ |
219,079 |
|
|
$ |
183,845 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains
or losses for the period
included in earnings
(or OCI) attributable to the
change in unrealized gains or
losses relating to assets still
held at reporting date |
|
$ |
(14,321 |
) |
|
$ |
3,403 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
5,259 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Transfers in / out of Level 3 include a transfer in of $323.6 million relating to municipal securities, due to lack of observable market data, a
transfer out of $184.1 million of securities related to the consolidation of a 2009 automobile trust, and a transfer in of $180.0 million of loans related
to the consolidation of a 2009 automobile trust. |
100
The table below summarizes the classification of gains and losses due to changes in fair
value, recorded in earnings for Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2011, and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
Private- |
|
|
backed |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Equity |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
MSRs |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
securities |
|
|
label CMO |
|
|
securities |
|
|
loans |
|
|
investments |
|
Classification of gains and losses in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking income (loss) |
|
$ |
(6,472 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,704 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
(3,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(2,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(6,472 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,704 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(442 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,270 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,511 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
Private- |
|
|
backed |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Equity |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
MSRs |
|
|
instruments |
|
|
securities |
|
|
label CMO |
|
|
securities |
|
|
loans |
|
|
investments |
|
Classification of gains and losses in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking income (loss) |
|
$ |
(14,321 |
) |
|
$ |
3,392 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,604 |
) |
|
|
(3,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fee income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(14,321 |
) |
|
$ |
3,392 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,090 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,050 |
) |
|
$ |
5,259 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
Certain assets and liabilities may be required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition. These assets and liabilities are not
measured at fair value on an ongoing basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in
certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment. At March 31, 2011, assets
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
48.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48.2 |
|
|
$ |
(9.6 |
) |
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
Periodically, Huntington records nonrecurring adjustments of collateral-dependent loans
measured for impairment when establishing the allowance for credit losses. Such amounts are
generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan. Appraisals are
generally obtained to support the fair value of the collateral and incorporate measures such as
recent sales prices for comparable properties and cost of construction. In cases where the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, an impairment charge is
recognized. At March 31, 2011, Huntington identified $48.2 million of impaired loans for which the
fair value is recorded based upon collateral value. For the three-month period ended March 31,
2011, nonrecurring fair value impairment of $9.6 million were recorded within the provision for
credit losses.
Other real estate owned properties are valued based on appraisals and third party price
opinions, less estimated selling costs. At March 31, 2011, Huntington had $54.6 million of OREO
assets at fair value. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, fair value losses of $0.5
million were recorded within noninterest expense.
101
Fair values of financial instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of Huntingtons financial instruments at March
31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term assets |
|
$ |
1,338,819 |
|
|
$ |
1,338,819 |
|
|
$ |
982,926 |
|
|
$ |
982,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,674,722 |
|
|
$ |
1,674,722 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
164,489 |
|
|
|
164,489 |
|
|
|
185,404 |
|
|
|
185,404 |
|
|
|
150,463 |
|
|
|
150,463 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
164,282 |
|
|
|
164,282 |
|
|
|
793,285 |
|
|
|
793,285 |
|
|
|
327,408 |
|
|
|
327,408 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
9,322,434 |
|
|
|
9,322,434 |
|
|
|
9,895,244 |
|
|
|
9,895,244 |
|
|
|
8,946,364 |
|
|
|
8,946,364 |
|
Net loans and direct
financing leases |
|
|
37,112,610 |
|
|
|
35,782,739 |
|
|
|
36,857,499 |
|
|
|
35,403,910 |
|
|
|
35,453,712 |
|
|
|
33,356,786 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
251,205 |
|
|
|
251,205 |
|
|
|
346,133 |
|
|
|
346,133 |
|
|
|
297,971 |
|
|
|
297,971 |
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(41,366,487 |
) |
|
|
(41,554,364 |
) |
|
|
(41,853,898 |
) |
|
|
(41,993,567 |
) |
|
|
(40,303,467 |
) |
|
|
(40,530,220 |
) |
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,051,258 |
) |
|
|
(2,012,436 |
) |
|
|
(2,040,732 |
) |
|
|
(1,982,545 |
) |
|
|
(980,839 |
) |
|
|
(968,271 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
(21,379 |
) |
|
|
(21,379 |
) |
|
|
(172,519 |
) |
|
|
(172,519 |
) |
|
|
(157,895 |
) |
|
|
(157,895 |
) |
Other long-term debt |
|
|
(1,900,555 |
) |
|
|
(1,914,565 |
) |
|
|
(2,144,092 |
) |
|
|
(2,157,358 |
) |
|
|
(2,727,745 |
) |
|
|
(2,726,066 |
) |
Subordinated notes |
|
|
(1,487,566 |
) |
|
|
(1,406,068 |
) |
|
|
(1,497,216 |
) |
|
|
(1,377,851 |
) |
|
|
(1,266,907 |
) |
|
|
(1,075,132 |
) |
Derivatives |
|
|
(192,569 |
) |
|
|
(192,569 |
) |
|
|
(239,240 |
) |
|
|
(239,240 |
) |
|
|
(237,072 |
) |
|
|
(237,072 |
) |
The short-term nature of certain assets and liabilities result in their carrying value
approximating fair value. These include trading account securities, customers acceptance
liabilities, short-term borrowings, bank acceptances outstanding, FHLB advances, and cash and
short-term assets, which include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in banks, and
federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. Loan commitments and letters
of credit generally have short-term, variable-rate features and contain clauses that limit
Huntingtons exposure to changes in customer credit quality. Accordingly, their carrying values,
which are immaterial at the respective balance sheet dates, are reasonable estimates of fair value.
Not all the financial instruments listed in the table above are subject to the disclosure
provisions of ASC Topic 820.
Certain assets, the most significant being operating lease assets, bank owned life insurance,
and premises and equipment, do not meet the definition of a financial instrument and are excluded
from this disclosure. Similarly, mortgage and nonmortgage servicing rights, deposit base, and other
customer relationship intangibles are not considered financial instruments and are not included
above. Accordingly, this fair value information is not intended to, and does not, represent
Huntingtons underlying value. Many of the assets and liabilities subject to the disclosure
requirements are not actively traded, requiring fair values to be estimated by Management. These
estimations necessarily involve the use of judgment about a wide variety of factors, including but
not limited to, relevancy of market prices of comparable instruments, expected future cash flows,
and appropriate discount rates.
The following methods and assumptions were used by Huntington to estimate the fair value of
the remaining classes of financial instruments:
Loans and Direct Financing Leases
Variable-rate loans that reprice frequently are based on carrying amounts, as adjusted for
estimated credit losses. The fair values for other loans and leases are estimated using discounted
cash flow analyses and employ interest rates currently being offered for loans and leases with
similar terms. The rates take into account the position of the yield curve, as well as an
adjustment for prepayment risk, operating costs, and profit. This value is also reduced by an
estimate of probable losses and the credit risk associated in the loan and lease portfolio. The
valuation of the loan portfolio reflected discounts that Huntington believed are consistent with
transactions occurring in the market place.
Deposits
Demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the
amount payable on demand. The fair values of fixed-rate time deposits are estimated by discounting
cash flows using interest rates currently being offered on certificates with similar maturities.
102
Debt
Fixed-rate, long-term debt is based upon quoted market prices, which are inclusive of Huntingtons
credit risk. In the absence of quoted market prices, discounted cash flows using market rates for
similar debt with the same maturities are used in the determination of fair value.
13. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Derivative financial instruments are recorded in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet as either an asset or a liability (in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and
other liabilities, respectively) and measured at fair value.
Derivatives used in Asset and Liability Management Activities
A variety of derivative financial instruments, principally interest rate swaps, caps, floors,
and collars, are used in asset and liability management activities to protect against the risk of
adverse price or interest rate movements. These instruments provide flexibility in adjusting
Huntingtons sensitivity to changes in interest rates without exposure to loss of principal and
higher funding requirements. Huntington records derivatives at fair value, as further described
in Note 12. Collateral agreements are regularly entered into as part of the underlying derivative
agreements with Huntingtons counterparties to mitigate counterparty credit risk. At March 31,
2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, aggregate credit risk associated with these
derivatives, net of collateral that has been pledged by the counterparty, was $37.2 million, $39.9
million, and $24.7 million, respectively. The credit risk associated with interest rate swaps is
calculated after considering master netting agreements.
At March 31, 2011, Huntington pledged $194.6 million of investment securities and cash
collateral to counterparties, while other counterparties pledged $64.4 million of investment
securities and cash collateral to Huntington to satisfy collateral netting agreements. In the
event of credit downgrades, Huntington could be required to provide $5.3 million of additional
collateral.
The following table presents the gross notional values of derivatives used in Huntingtons
asset and liability management activities at March 31, 2011, identified by the underlying interest
rate-sensitive instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands ) |
|
Hedges |
|
|
Hedges |
|
|
Total |
|
Instruments associated with: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,305,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,305,000 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
958,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
958,912 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
598,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,000 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notional value at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,591,912 |
|
|
$ |
5,305,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,896,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents additional information about the interest rate swaps used in
Huntingtons asset and liability management activities at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Rate |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands ) |
|
Value |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Receive |
|
|
Pay |
|
Asset conversion swaps receive fixed generic |
|
$ |
5,305,000 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
21,262 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
Liability conversion swaps receive fixed generic |
|
|
1,591,912 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
46,740 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total swap portfolio |
|
$ |
6,896,912 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
68,001 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These derivative financial instruments were entered into for the purpose of managing the
interest rate risk of assets and liabilities. Consequently, net amounts receivable or payable on
contracts hedging either interest earning assets or interest bearing liabilities were accrued as an
adjustment to either interest income or interest expense. The net amounts resulted in an increase
to net interest income of $33.9 million and $58.0 million for the three-month periods ended March
31, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
In connection with securitization activities, Huntington purchased interest rate caps with a
notional value totaling $0.9 billion. These purchased caps were assigned to the securitization
trust for the benefit of the security holders. Interest rate caps were also sold totaling $0.9
billion outside the securitization structure. Both the purchased and sold caps are marked to market
through income.
In connection
with the sale of Huntingtons Class B
Visaâ
shares, Huntington
entered into a swap agreement with the purchaser of the shares. The swap agreement adjusts for
dilution in the conversion ratio of Class B shares resulting from the Visaâ
litigation. At March 31, 2011, the fair value of the swap liability of $3.5 million is an
estimate of the exposure liability based upon Huntingtons assessment of the probability-weighted
potential Visaâ litigation losses.
103
The following table presents the fair values at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March
31, 2010 of Huntingtons derivatives that are designated and not designated as hedging instruments.
Amounts in the table below are presented gross without the impact of any net collateral
arrangements.
Asset derivatives included in accrued income and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
68,385 |
|
|
$ |
127,346 |
|
|
$ |
79,998 |
|
Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
225,781 |
|
|
|
263,015 |
|
|
|
266,867 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contracts |
|
$ |
297,616 |
|
|
$ |
393,206 |
|
|
$ |
347,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives included in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate contracts not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
187,155 |
|
|
|
233,805 |
|
|
|
236,109 |
|
Foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
3,491 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contracts |
|
$ |
191,030 |
|
|
$ |
236,912 |
|
|
$ |
236,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedges are purchased to convert deposits and subordinated and other long-term debt
from fixed-rate obligations to floating rate. The changes in fair value of the derivative are, to
the extent that the hedging relationship is effective, recorded through earnings and offset against
changes in the fair value of the hedged item.
The following table presents the change in fair value for derivatives designated as fair value
hedges as well as the offsetting change in fair value on the hedged item for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging deposits (1) |
|
$ |
(5,760 |
) |
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
Change in fair value of hedged deposits (1) |
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
(3,156 |
) |
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging subordinated notes (2) |
|
|
(9,154 |
) |
|
|
3,643 |
|
Change in fair value of hedged subordinated notes (2) |
|
|
9,154 |
|
|
|
(3,643 |
) |
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging other long-term debt (2) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
517 |
|
Change in fair value of hedged other long-term debt (2) |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense deposits in the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in noninterest
income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective portion of the hedging relationship is recognized in Interest expense subordinated notes and other long-term debt
in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Any resulting ineffective portion of the hedging relationship is
recognized in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. |
For cash flow hedges, interest rate swap contracts were entered into that pay fixed-rate
interest in exchange for the receipt of variable-rate interest without the exchange of the
contracts underlying notional amount, which effectively converts a portion of its floating-rate
debt to a fixed-rate debt. This reduces the potentially adverse impact of increases in interest
rates on future interest expense. Other LIBOR-based commercial and industrial loans were
effectively converted to fixed-rate by entering into contracts that swap certain variable-rate
interest payments for fixed-rate interest payments at designated times.
To the extent these derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash
flows, changes in the derivatives fair value will not be included in current earnings but are
reported as a component of OCI in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity. These changes in fair value will be included in earnings of future periods when earnings
are also
affected by the changes in the hedged cash flows. To the extent these derivatives are not
effective, changes in their fair values are immediately included in noninterest income.
104
The following table presents the gains and (losses) recognized in OCI and the location in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income of gains and (losses) reclassified from OCI
into earnings for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010 for derivatives designated
as effective cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (gain) or loss |
|
|
|
Amount of gain or |
|
|
|
|
reclassified from |
|
|
|
(loss) recognized in |
|
|
|
|
accumulated OCI into |
|
Derivatives in cash flow |
|
OCI on derivatives |
|
|
Location of gain or (loss) reclassified from |
|
earnings (effective |
|
hedging relationships |
|
(effective portion) |
|
|
accumulated OCI into earnings (effective portion) |
|
portion) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
(25,143 |
) |
|
$ |
25,762 |
|
|
Interest and fee income - loans and leases |
|
$ |
16,504 |
|
|
$ |
(35,655 |
) |
FHLB Advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense - subordinated notes and other long-term debt |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(25,143 |
) |
|
$ |
25,762 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,511 |
|
|
$ |
(34,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the next twelve months, Huntington expects to reclassify to earnings $37.4 million of
after-tax unrealized gains on cash flow hedging derivatives currently in OCI.
The following table details the gains and (losses) recognized in noninterest income on the
ineffective portion on interest rate contracts for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for
the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
FHLB Advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives used in trading activities
Various derivative financial instruments are offered to enable customers to meet their
financing and investing objectives and for their risk management purposes. Derivative financial
instruments used in trading activities consisted predominantly of interest rate swaps, but also
included interest rate caps, floors, and futures, as well as foreign exchange options. Interest
rate options grant the option holder the right to buy or sell an underlying financial instrument
for a predetermined price before the contract expires. Interest rate futures are commitments to
either purchase or sell a financial instrument at a future date for a specified price or yield and
may be settled in cash or through delivery of the underlying financial instrument. Interest rate
caps and floors are option-based contracts that entitle the buyer to receive cash payments based on
the difference between a designated reference rate and a strike price, applied to a notional
amount. Written options, primarily caps, expose Huntington to market risk but not credit risk.
Purchased options contain both credit and market risk. The interest rate risk of these customer
derivatives is mitigated by entering into similar derivatives having offsetting terms with other
counterparties. The credit risk to these customers is evaluated and included in the calculation of
fair value.
The net fair values of these derivative financial instruments, for which the gross amounts are
included in accrued income and other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities at March 31,
2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, were $46.2 million, $46.3 million and $44.0 million,
respectively. The total notional values of derivative financial instruments used by Huntington on
behalf of customers, including offsetting derivatives, were $9.6 billion, $9.8 billion and $9.4
billion at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, respectively. Huntingtons
credit risks from interest rate swaps used for trading purposes were $225.8 million, $263.0 million
and $266.9 million at the same dates, respectively.
105
Derivatives used in mortgage banking activities
Huntington also uses certain derivative financial instruments to offset changes in value of
its MSRs. These derivatives consist primarily of forward interest rate agreements and forward
mortgage securities. The derivative instruments used are not designated as hedges. Accordingly,
such derivatives are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in mortgage
banking income. The following table summarizes the derivative assets and liabilities used in
mortgage banking activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock agreements |
|
$ |
2,996 |
|
|
$ |
2,817 |
|
|
$ |
3,301 |
|
Forward trades and options |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
20,669 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets |
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
23,486 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock agreements |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Forward trades and options |
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(2,328 |
) |
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative asset (liability) |
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
21,158 |
|
|
$ |
3,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total notional value of these derivative financial instruments at March 31, 2011, December
31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, was $2.4 billion, $2.6 billion, and $3.5 billion, respectively. The
total notional amount at March 31, 2011, corresponds to trading assets with a fair value of $5.6
million and trading liabilities with a fair value of $1.8 million. Total MSR hedging gains and
(losses) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, were ($4.2) million, and $11.9
million, respectively. Included in total MSR hedging gains and losses for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011, and 2010 were gains and (losses) related to derivative instruments of ($3.7)
million, and $11.5 million, respectively. These amounts are included in mortgage banking income in
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
14. VIEs
Consolidated VIEs
Consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2011, consisted of the Franklin 2009 Trust and certain loan
securitization trusts. Loan securitizations include automobile loan and lease securitization
trusts formed in 2009, 2008, and 2006. Huntington has determined the trusts are VIEs. Through
Huntingtons continuing involvement in the trusts (including ownership of beneficial interests and
certain servicing or collateral management activities), Huntington is the primary beneficiary.
The carrying amount and classification of the trusts assets and liabilities included in the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Franklin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2009 Trust |
|
|
2009 Trust |
|
|
2008 Trust |
|
|
2006 Trust |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,724 |
|
|
$ |
20,876 |
|
|
$ |
69,902 |
|
|
$ |
117,502 |
|
Loans and leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,851 |
|
|
|
245,332 |
|
|
|
1,057,647 |
|
|
|
1,761,830 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
|
|
(9,202 |
) |
|
|
(11,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans and leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,851 |
|
|
|
243,198 |
|
|
|
1,048,445 |
|
|
|
1,867,996 |
|
Accrued income and other assets |
|
|
5,971 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
|
13,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
487,662 |
|
|
$ |
265,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,122,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,998,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
294,905 |
|
|
$ |
103,002 |
|
|
$ |
746,421 |
|
|
$ |
1,144,328 |
|
Accrued interest and other
liabilities |
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
6,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
5,100 |
|
|
$ |
295,495 |
|
|
$ |
103,216 |
|
|
$ |
746,594 |
|
|
$ |
1,150,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
Trust-Preferred Securities
Huntington has certain wholly-owned trusts that are not consolidated. The trusts have been
formed for the sole purpose of issuing trust-preferred securities, from which the proceeds are then
invested in Huntington junior subordinated debentures, which are reflected in Huntingtons
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as subordinated notes. The trust securities are the
obligations of the trusts and are not consolidated within Huntingtons Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. A list of trust-preferred securities outstanding at March 31,
2011, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of |
|
|
Investment in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subordinated note/ |
|
|
unconsolidated |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Rate |
|
|
debenture issued to trust (1) |
|
|
subsidiary (2) |
|
Huntington Capital I |
|
|
1.00 |
%(3) |
|
$ |
138,816 |
|
|
$ |
6,186 |
|
Huntington Capital II |
|
|
0.94 |
(4) |
|
|
60,093 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
Huntington Capital III |
|
|
6.69 |
|
|
|
114,079 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
BancFirst Ohio Trust Preferred |
|
|
8.54 |
|
|
|
23,234 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
Sky Financial Capital Trust I |
|
|
8.52 |
|
|
|
64,402 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
Sky Financial Capital Trust II |
|
|
3.24 |
(5) |
|
|
30,929 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
Sky Financial Capital Trust III |
|
|
1.29 |
(6) |
|
|
77,401 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
Sky Financial Capital Trust IV |
|
|
1.28 |
(6) |
|
|
77,402 |
|
|
|
2,320 |
|
Prospect Trust I |
|
|
3.55 |
(7) |
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
592,542 |
|
|
$ |
17,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the principal amount of debentures issued to each trust, including unamortized original issue discount. |
|
(2) |
|
Huntingtons investment in the unconsolidated trusts represents the only risk of loss. |
|
(3) |
|
Variable effective rate at March 31, 2011, based on three month LIBOR + 0.70. |
|
(4) |
|
Variable effective rate at March 31, 2011, based on three month LIBOR + 0.625. |
|
(5) |
|
Variable effective rate at March 31, 2011, based on three month LIBOR + 2.95. |
|
(6) |
|
Variable effective rate at March 31, 2011, based on three month LIBOR + 1.40. |
|
(7) |
|
Variable effective rate at March 31, 2011, based on three month LIBOR + 3.25. |
Each issue of the junior subordinated debentures has an interest rate equal to the
corresponding trust securities distribution rate. Huntington has the right to defer payment of
interest on the debentures at any time, or from time-to-time for a period not exceeding five years,
provided that no extension period may extend beyond the stated maturity of the related debentures.
During any such extension period, distributions to the trust securities will also be deferred and
Huntingtons ability to pay dividends on its common stock will be restricted. Periodic cash
payments and payments upon liquidation or redemption with respect to trust securities are
guaranteed by Huntington to the extent of funds held by the trusts. The guarantee ranks
subordinate and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness of the Company to the same extent as
the junior subordinated debt. The guarantee does not place a limitation on the amount of
additional indebtedness that may be incurred by Huntington.
Low Income Housing Tax Credit Partnerships
Huntington makes certain equity investments in various limited partnerships that sponsor
affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit pursuant to Section 42 of
the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on
capital, to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings, and to assist
in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act. The primary activities of the
limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi family housing
that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. Generally, these types of investments are funded
through a combination of debt and equity.
Huntington does not have majority ownership in the limited partnership interests in these
entities and is not the primary beneficiary. Huntington uses the equity method to account for the
majority of its investments in these entities. These investments are included in accrued income
and other assets. At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, Huntington had
commitments of $313.7 million, $316.0 million, and $289.3 million, respectively, of which $259.1
million, $260.1 million, and $203.3 million, respectively, were funded. The unfunded portion is
included in accrued expenses and other liabilities.
107
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Commitments to extend credit
In the ordinary course of business, Huntington makes various commitments to extend credit that
are not reflected in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The contractual
amounts of these financial agreements at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010,
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contract amount represents credit risk: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
6,233 |
|
|
$ |
5,933 |
|
|
$ |
5,664 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
5,552 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates, are variable-rate, and
contain clauses that permit Huntington to terminate or otherwise renegotiate the contracts in the
event of a significant deterioration in the customers credit quality. These arrangements normally
require the payment of a fee by the customer, the pricing of which is based on prevailing market
conditions, credit quality, probability of funding, and other relevant factors. Since many of these
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contract amounts are not
necessarily indicative of future cash requirements. The interest rate risk arising from these
financial instruments is insignificant as a result of their predominantly short-term, variable-rate
nature.
Standby letters-of-credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private
borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. Most
of these arrangements mature within two years. The carrying amount of deferred revenue associated
with these guarantees was $1.7 million, $2.2 million, and $2.7 million at March 31, 2011, December
31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, respectively.
Through the Companys credit process, Huntington monitors the credit risks of outstanding
standby letters-of-credit. When it is probable that a standby letter-of-credit will be drawn and
not repaid in full, losses are recognized in the provision for credit losses. At March 31, 2011,
Huntington had $0.6 billion of standby letters-of-credit outstanding, of which 77% were
collateralized. Included in this $0.6 billion total are letters-of-credit issued by the Bank that
support securities that were issued by customers and remarketed by The Huntington Investment
Company, the Companys broker-dealer subsidiary.
Huntington uses an internal grading system to assess an estimate of loss on its loan and lease
portfolio. This same grading system is used to monitor credit risk associated with standby
letters-of-credit. Under this grading system as of March 31, 2011, approximately $66.6 million of
the standby letters-of-credit were rated strong with sufficient asset quality, liquidity, and good
debt capacity and coverage; approximately $454.3 million were rated average with acceptable asset
quality, liquidity, and modest debt capacity; and approximately $59.5 million were rated
substandard with negative financial trends, structural weaknesses, operating difficulties, and
higher leverage.
Commercial letters-of-credit represent short-term, self-liquidating instruments that
facilitate customer trade transactions and generally have maturities of no longer than 90 days. The
goods or cargo being traded normally secures these instruments.
Commitments to sell loans
Huntington enters into forward contracts relating to its mortgage banking business to hedge
the exposures from commitments to make new residential mortgage loans with existing customers and
from mortgage loans classified as loans held for sale. At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and
March 31, 2010, Huntington had commitments to sell residential real estate loans of $360.9 million,
$998.7 million, and $600.9 million, respectively. These contracts mature in less than one year.
Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various state, city and foreign jurisdictions. Federal income tax audits have been completed
through 2007. Various state and other jurisdictions remain open to examination for tax years 2005
and forward.
The IRS and the Commonwealth of Kentucky have proposed adjustments to the Companys previously
filed tax returns. Management believes the tax positions taken by the Company related to such
proposed adjustments were correct and supported by applicable statutes, regulations, and judicial
authority, and intends to vigorously defend them. It is possible the ultimate resolution of the
proposed adjustments, if unfavorable, may be material to the results of operations in the period it
occurs. However, although no
assurance can be given, Management believes the resolution of these examinations will not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
position.
108
Huntington accounts for uncertainties in income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income
Taxes. At March 31, 2011, Huntington had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $14.5 million in
income tax liability related to tax positions. Total interest accrued on the unrecognized tax
benefits amounted to $2.3 million as of March 31, 2011. Due to the complexity of some of these
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from
the current estimate of the tax liabilities. However, any ultimate settlement is not expected to be
material to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole. Huntington
recognizes interest and penalties on income tax assessments or income tax refunds in the financial
statements as a component of its provision for income taxes. Huntington does not anticipate the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly change within the next 12 months.
Litigation
The nature of Huntingtons business ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims,
litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings, all of which are
considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. When the Company determines it has
meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Company will
consider settlement of cases when, in Managements judgment, it is in the best interests of both
the Company and its shareholders to do so.
On at least a quarterly basis, Huntington assesses its liabilities and contingencies in
connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For
matters where it is probable the Company will incur a loss and the amount can be reasonably
estimated, Huntington establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is
adjusted as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a loss is not
probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.
In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is
reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes an estimate of the aggregate range of
reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued, for current legal proceedings is from $0
to approximately $150.0 million at March 31, 2011. For certain other cases, Management cannot
reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment,
given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in
preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings
whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the
proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings.
Accordingly, Managements estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or
less than the current estimate.
While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information
currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, Management believes that
the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the
Companys legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is
possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the
Companys consolidated financial position in a particular period.
The Bank is a defendant in three lawsuits, which collectively may be material, arising from
its commercial lending, depository, and equipment leasing relationships with Cyberco Holdings, Inc.
(Cyberco), based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. In November 2004, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and the IRS raided the Cyberco facilities and Cybercos operations ceased. An equipment leasing
fraud was uncovered, whereby Cyberco sought financing from equipment lessors and financial
institutions, including the Bank, allegedly to purchase computer equipment from Teleservices Group,
Inc. (Teleservices). Cyberco created fraudulent documentation to close the financing transactions
while, in fact, no computer equipment was ever purchased or leased from Teleservices which proved
to be a shell corporation.
On June 22, 2007, a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of
Michigan (District Court) was filed by El Camino Resources, Ltd, ePlus Group, Inc., and Bank
Midwest, N.A., all of whom had lending relationships with Teleservices, against Cyberco and the
Bank, alleging that Cyberco defrauded plaintiffs and converted plaintiffs property through various
means in connection with the equipment leasing scheme and alleges that the Bank aided and abetted
Cyberco in committing the alleged fraud and conversion. The complaint further alleges that the
Banks actions amounted to statutory conversion entitling one of the plaintiffs to recover $1.9
million from the Bank as a form of unjust enrichment. In addition, plaintiffs claimed direct
damages of approximately $32.0 million and additional consequential damages in excess of $20.0
million. On July 1, 2010, the District Court issued an Opinion and Order adopting in full a federal
magistrates recommendation for summary judgment in favor of the Bank on all claims except the
unjust enrichment claim, and a partial summary judgment was entered on July 1, 2010. The Bank has
requested an opportunity to file a motion for summary judgment on the remaining unjust enrichment
claim against it, and the plaintiffs have requested an opportunity to file a motion for
reconsideration regarding the partial summary judgment entered against them. Pre-motion
conferences have not yet been scheduled.
109
The Bank is also involved with the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings of both Cyberco, filed on
December 9, 2004, and Teleservices, filed on January 21, 2005. The Cyberco bankruptcy trustee
commenced an adversary proceeding against the Bank on December 8, 2006, seeking over $70.0 million
he alleges was transferred to the Bank. The Bank responded with a motion to dismiss and all but the
preference claims were dismissed on January 29, 2008. The Cyberco bankruptcy trustee alleges
preferential transfers in the amount of $9.7 million. Since January 2008, the case has not
progressed due, principally, to the adversary proceeding in the Teleservices bankruptcy case.
The Teleservices bankruptcy trustee filed an adversary proceeding against the Bank on January
19, 2007, seeking to avoid and recover alleged transfers that occurred in two ways: (1) checks made
payable to the Bank to be applied to Cybercos indebtedness to the Bank, and (2) deposits into
Cybercos bank accounts with the Bank. In her motion, the Teleservices bankruptcy trustee alleges
the fraudulent transfers to the Bank totaled approximately $73.0 million and seeks judgment in that
amount (which includes the $9.7 million alleged to be preferential transfers by the Cyberco
bankruptcy trustee). On March 17, 2011, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Opinion determining the
alleged transfers made to the Bank were not received in good faith from the time period of April
30, 2004, through November 2004, and that the Bank had failed to show a lack of knowledge of the
avoidability of the alleged transfers from November 17, 2003, through April 30, 2004. The
Teleservices bankruptcy trustees affirmative case to establish the alleged fraudulent conveyances
to the Bank remains to be established.
In the pending bankruptcy cases of Cyberco and Teleservices, the Bank moved to substantively
consolidate the two bankruptcy estates, principally on the ground that Teleservices was the alter
ego and a mere instrumentality of Cyberco at all times. On July 2, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court
issued an Opinion denying the Banks motions for substantive consolidation of the two bankruptcy
estates. The Bank has appealed this ruling and the appeal is pending.
16. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The parent company condensed financial statements, which include transactions with
subsidiaries, are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
566,516 |
|
|
$ |
615,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,090,753 |
|
Due from The Huntington National Bank |
|
|
953,074 |
|
|
|
954,565 |
|
|
|
954,205 |
|
Due from non-bank subsidiaries |
|
|
214,213 |
|
|
|
225,560 |
|
|
|
258,009 |
|
Investment in The Huntington National Bank |
|
|
3,625,966 |
|
|
|
3,515,597 |
|
|
|
3,182,944 |
|
Investment in non-bank subsidiaries |
|
|
804,054 |
|
|
|
790,248 |
|
|
|
825,108 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
117,616 |
|
|
|
110,181 |
|
|
|
168,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,281,439 |
|
|
$ |
6,211,318 |
|
|
$ |
6,479,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
691 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
937,434 |
|
|
|
937,434 |
|
|
|
637,434 |
|
Dividends payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
305,306 |
|
|
|
293,242 |
|
|
|
472,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,242,840 |
|
|
|
1,230,776 |
|
|
|
1,110,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (2) |
|
|
5,038,599 |
|
|
|
4,980,542 |
|
|
|
5,369,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
6,281,439 |
|
|
$ |
6,211,318 |
|
|
$ |
6,479,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes restricted cash of $125,000. |
|
(2) |
|
See Huntingtons Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity. |
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Statements of Income |
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Huntington National Bank |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-bank subsidiaries |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
Interest from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Huntington National Bank |
|
|
20,185 |
|
|
|
21,016 |
|
Non-bank subsidiaries |
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
Other |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income |
|
|
29,482 |
|
|
|
44,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
|
8,694 |
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
Other |
|
|
9,565 |
|
|
|
12,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
23,014 |
|
|
|
19,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
24,905 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
15,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
9,056 |
|
Increase in undistributed net income of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Huntington National Bank |
|
|
118,116 |
|
|
|
40,167 |
|
Non-bank subsidiaries |
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
(9,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Statements of Cash Flows |
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries |
|
|
(124,104 |
) |
|
|
(48,681 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
36,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
|
|
6,813 |
|
|
|
27,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments from subsidiaries |
|
|
19,091 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
(9,200 |
) |
|
|
(301,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
9,891 |
|
|
|
(281,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,179 |
) |
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(16,321 |
) |
|
|
(7,144 |
) |
Redemption of Warrant to the Treasury |
|
|
(49,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(65,355 |
) |
|
|
(32,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(48,651 |
) |
|
|
(285,786 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
615,167 |
|
|
|
1,376,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
566,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,090,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
8,694 |
|
|
$ |
5,541 |
|
17. SEGMENT REPORTING
During the 2010 fourth quarter, Huntington reorganized our business segments to better align
certain business unit reporting with segment executives to accelerate cross-sell results and
provide greater focus on the execution of strategic plans. We have four major business segments:
Retail and Business Banking, Regional and Commercial Banking, Automobile Finance and Commercial
Real Estate, and Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending. A Treasury / Other
function includes our insurance business and other unallocated assets, liabilities, revenue, and
expense. All periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period classification.
Segment results are determined based upon the Companys management reporting system, which
assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each of the business segments. The process is
designed around the Companys organizational and management structure and, accordingly, the results
derived are not necessarily comparable with similar information published by other financial
institutions. A description of each segment and table of financial results is presented below.
Retail and Business Banking: The Retail and Business Banking segment provides a wide array of
financial products and services including but not limited to loans, deposits, investment, and
treasury management services to our consumer and small business customers. Huntington serves
customers primarily through our traditional banking network of over 600 branches as well as our
convenience branches located in grocery stores and retirement centers in Ohio, Michigan,
Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, and Kentucky. In addition to our extensive branch network,
customers can access Huntington through online banking, mobile banking, 24-hour telephone banking,
and over 1,300 ATMs.
Huntington has established a Fair Play banking philosophy and is building a reputation for
meeting the banking needs of consumers in a manner which makes them feel supported and appreciated.
In 2010, Huntington brought innovation to the checking account by providing consumers with a
24-hour grace period to correct a shortfall in an account and avoid the associated overdraft fees.
Huntington believes customers are recognizing this and other efforts as key differentiators and it
is earning us more customers and deeper relationships.
112
Business Banking is a dynamic and growing part of Huntingtons business and we are committed
to being the bank of choice for small businesses in our markets. Business Banking is defined as
companies with revenues less than $15 million and consists of approximately 130,000 businesses.
Huntington continues to develop products and services that are designed specifically to meet the
needs of small business. Huntington continues to look for ways to help companies find solutions to
their capital needs, from our program helping businesses that had struggled in the economic
downturn but are now showing several quarters of profitability, to our participation in the Small
Business Administration programs. As of March 31, 2011, the SBA reported Huntington ranked first in
our footprint and third in the nation in the number of SBA loans originated for the first six
months of the SBA fiscal year.
Regional and Commercial Banking: This segment provides a variety of banking products and services
to customers within our primary banking markets that generally have larger credit exposures and
sales revenues compared with our Retail and Business Banking customers. Huntington products in
this segment include commercial loans, international trade, treasury management, leasing, capital
market services including interest rate risk protection products, and mezzanine investment
capabilities. Regional and Commercial Banking also focuses on financial solutions for corporate
and institutional customers including investment banking, sales and trading of securities, and
retirement plan services. The Regional and Commercial Banking team has significantly expanded its
equipment leasing capabilities, as well as focused on serving the commercial banking needs of key
verticals including not-for-profit organizations, healthcare entities, and large corporations.
Commercial bankers personally deliver these products and services directly and with cross-segment
product partners. Huntington consistently strives to develop extensive relationships with clients
creating defined relationship plans which identify needs and offer solutions.
The primary focus for Regional and Commercial Banking is our ability to gain a deeper
relationship with our existing customers and to increase our market share through our unique
customer solution strategy. This includes a comprehensive cross-sell approach to capture the
untapped opportunities within our customer and prospect community. This strategy embodies a shift
from credit-only focus, to a total customer solution approach with an increasing share-of-wallet.
The Regional and Commercial Banking business model includes eleven regional markets driven by
local execution. These markets are supported by expertise in large corporate and middle market
segments, by capabilities in treasury management and equipment finance, and by vertical strategies
within the healthcare and not-for-profit industries.
The commercial portfolio includes a distribution across industries and segments which
resembles the market demographics of our footprint. A strategic focus of Regional and Commercial
Banking is to target underpenetrated markets within our footprint and capitalize on opportunities
in industries such as not-for-profit and healthcare.
In addition, Regional and Commercial Banking expanded the leadership, investment, and
capabilities for treasury management and equipment finance. With our investments in treasury
management, Huntington differentiated itself through our implementation experience and the speed at
which products and services are delivered to our customers. In equipment finance, Huntington
distinguished itself through aggressive business development and local service delivery and by
strategically aligning with our bank partners to drive market share. The increase in originations
during the current period reflected the strategic decision to enter three new markets: business
aircraft finance, rail industry finance, and lender finance.
Automobile Finance and Commercial Real Estate: This segment provides lending and other banking
products and services to customers outside of our normal retail and commercial banking segments.
Our products and services are delivered through highly specialized relationship-focused bankers and
our cross segment product partners. Huntington creates well-defined relationship plans which
identify needs where solutions are developed and customer commitments are obtained.
The Automotive Finance team services automobile dealerships, its owners, and consumers buying
automobiles through these dealerships. Huntington has provided new and used automobile financing
and dealer services throughout the Midwest since the early 1950s. This consistency in the market
and our focus on working with strong dealerships, has allowed us to actively deepen relationships
while building a strong reputation. Huntington has a dominant market share position within our
Midwest footprint as evidenced by a #1 share in two of our core states: Ohio and Kentucky
(AutoCount 2010). The Automotive team serves customers within our footprint and we have recently
expanded into the New England area.
The Commercial Real Estate team serves professional real estate developers, and Real Estate
Investment Trusts (REITs). Huntington has a clear focus on experienced, well-managed,
well-capitalized top tier real estate developers who are capable of operating in all economic
phases of the real estate industry. Most of our customers are located within our footprint.
113
Wealth Advisors, Government Finance, and Home Lending: This segment consists of our wealth
management, government banking, and home lending businesses. In wealth management, Huntington
provides financial services to high net worth clients in our primary banking markets and Florida.
Huntington Wealth Advisors delivers a comprehensive solution through a unified sales team
providing private banking, investment, insurance, and trust services. Aligned with the eleven
regional commercial banking markets, this coordinated service model delivers products and services
directly and through the other segment product partners. A fundamental point of differentiation is
our commitment to be in the market, working closely with clients and their other advisors to
identify needs, offer solutions and provide ongoing advice in an optimal client experience.
The Government Finance Group provides financial products and services to government and other
public sector entities in our primary banking markets. A locally based team of relationship
managers works with clients to meet their public finance, brokerage, trust, lending, and treasury
management needs.
Home Lending originates and services consumer loans and mortgages for customers who are
generally located in our primary banking markets. Consumer and mortgage lending products are
primarily distributed through the Retail and Business Banking segment, as well as through
commissioned loan originators. Closely aligned, our Community Development group serves an important
role as it focuses on delivering on our commitment to the communities Huntington serves.
The segment also includes the related businesses of investment management, investment
servicing, custody, corporate trust and retirement plan services. Huntington Asset Advisors
provides investment management services through a variety of internal and external channels,
including advising the Huntington Funds, our proprietary family of funds. Huntington Asset
Services offers administrative and operational support to fund complexes, including fund
accounting, transfer agency, administration, and distribution services. Our retirement plan
services business offers fully bundled and third party distribution of a variety of qualified and
non-qualified plan solutions, and the national settlements business focuses on providing banking
solutions to the litigation settlement market.
Listed below is certain operating basis financial information reconciled to Huntingtons March
31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, reported results by business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Retail & |
|
|
Regional & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statements |
|
Business |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury/ |
|
|
Huntington |
|
(dollar amounts in thousands ) |
|
Banking |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
AFCRE |
|
|
WGH |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
235,845 |
|
|
|
57,438 |
|
|
|
87,849 |
|
|
|
48,900 |
|
|
|
(25,702 |
) |
|
$ |
404,330 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
23,694 |
|
|
|
5,969 |
|
|
|
4,784 |
|
|
|
14,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,385 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
94,428 |
|
|
|
29,238 |
|
|
|
13,379 |
|
|
|
66,751 |
|
|
|
33,149 |
|
|
|
236,945 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
222,137 |
|
|
|
43,681 |
|
|
|
43,127 |
|
|
|
86,178 |
|
|
|
35,576 |
|
|
|
430,699 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
29,555 |
|
|
|
12,959 |
|
|
|
18,661 |
|
|
|
5,087 |
|
|
|
(31,517 |
) |
|
|
34,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating/reported net income (loss) |
|
$ |
54,887 |
|
|
$ |
24,067 |
|
|
$ |
34,656 |
|
|
$ |
9,448 |
|
|
$ |
3,388 |
|
|
$ |
126,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
203,405 |
|
|
$ |
50,831 |
|
|
|
77,044 |
|
|
|
37,927 |
|
|
|
24,686 |
|
|
$ |
393,893 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
67,974 |
|
|
|
41,207 |
|
|
|
117,639 |
|
|
|
(3,311 |
) |
|
|
11,499 |
|
|
|
235,008 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
94,645 |
|
|
|
25,393 |
|
|
|
17,101 |
|
|
|
70,211 |
|
|
|
33,502 |
|
|
|
240,852 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
214,777 |
|
|
|
35,554 |
|
|
|
39,025 |
|
|
|
83,875 |
|
|
|
24,862 |
|
|
|
398,093 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(21,882 |
) |
|
|
9,651 |
|
|
|
(31,029 |
) |
|
|
(38,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating/reported net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
|
$ |
(349 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,637 |
) |
|
$ |
17,923 |
|
|
$ |
52,856 |
|
|
$ |
39,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at |
|
|
Deposits at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(dollar amounts in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Retail & Business Banking |
|
$ |
13,155 |
|
|
$ |
13,088 |
|
|
$ |
13,111 |
|
|
$ |
28,984 |
|
|
$ |
29,298 |
|
|
$ |
28,273 |
|
Regional & Commercial Banking |
|
|
8,801 |
|
|
|
8,720 |
|
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
AFCRE |
|
|
13,149 |
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
|
12,611 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
WGH |
|
|
6,461 |
|
|
|
6,971 |
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
7,363 |
|
|
|
7,449 |
|
|
|
7,178 |
|
Treasury / Other |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
11,808 |
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,949 |
|
|
$ |
53,820 |
|
|
$ |
51,867 |
|
|
$ |
41,366 |
|
|
$ |
41,854 |
|
|
$ |
40,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
Item 3: |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the
Market Risk section of this report, which includes changes in market risk exposures from
disclosures presented in Huntingtons 2010 Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 4: |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Huntington maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Huntingtons Management, with the participation of its Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Huntingtons
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation,
Huntingtons Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end
of such period, Huntingtons disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have not been any significant changes in Huntingtons internal controls over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during
the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, Huntingtons internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
In accordance with the instructions to Part II, the other specified items in this part
have been omitted because they are not applicable or the information has been previously reported.
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
Legal Proceedings |
Information required by this item is set forth in Note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report and incorporated
herein by reference.
Information required by this item is set forth in Part 1 Item 2.- Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and incorporated
herein by reference.
Exhibit Index
This report incorporates by reference the documents listed below that we have previously filed with
the SEC. The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference information in this document. The
information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this document, except for any
information that is superseded by information that is included directly in this document.
This information may be read and copied at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains reports,
proxy statements, and other information about issuers, like us, who file electronically with the
SEC. The address of the site is http://www.sec.gov. The reports and other information filed by us
with the SEC are also available at our Internet web site. The address of the site is
http://www.huntington.com. Except as specifically incorporated by reference into this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, information on those web sites is not part of this report. You also should be
able to inspect reports, proxy statements, and other information about us at the offices of the
NASDAQ National Market at 33 Whitehall Street, New York, New York.
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report or |
|
SEC File or |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Registration |
|
Registration |
|
Exhibit |
|
Number |
|
Document Description |
|
Statement |
|
Number |
|
Reference |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 20, 2006 by
and among Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, Penguin
Acquisition, LLC and Sky Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
December 22, 2006.
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Restatement of Charter.
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December
31, 1993.
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
3 |
(i) |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated May
31, 2007
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated May
7, 2008
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles of Restatement of Charter.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
April 27, 2010
|
|
001-34073
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares
Incorporated, as of April 22, 2008.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
April 22, 2008
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares
Incorporated, as of April 22. 2008.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
April 22, 2008
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares
Incorporated, as of November 12, 2008.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
November 12, 2008
|
|
001-34073
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary of Huntington Bancshares
Incorporated, as of December 31, 2006.
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December
31, 2006
|
|
000-02525
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Bylaws of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, as amended
and restated, as of April 22, 2010.
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
April 27, 2010.
|
|
001-34073
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Instruments defining the Rights of Security Holders
reference is made to Articles Fifth, Eighth, and Tenth of
Articles of Restatement of Charter, as amended and
supplemented. Instruments defining the rights of holders of
long-term debt will be furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
* Second amendment to the 2007 Stock and Long-Term
Incentive Plan
|
|
Definitive Proxy
Statement for the
2010 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders
|
|
001-34073
|
|
|
A |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
* Form of Executive Agreement for certain executive officers
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March
30, 2010
|
|
001-34073
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
Dividends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
** |
|
The following material from Huntingtons Form 10-Q Report
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, formatted in
XBRL: (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets,
(ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income,
(iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes
in Shareholders Equity, (iv) Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
tagged as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Furnished, not filed. |
116
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: April 29, 2011 |
/s/ Stephen D. Steinour
|
|
|
Stephen D. Steinour |
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
Date: April 29, 2011 |
/s/ Donald R. Kimble
|
|
|
Donald R. Kimble |
|
|
Sr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
117