e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-34675
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
71-0987913 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
80 Lamberton Road
Windsor, CT 06095
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
860-298-4500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There
were 75,950,339 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of
August 11, 2011.
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For this purpose,
any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words
believes, anticipates, plans, expects, should, and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The important factors
discussed under the caption Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 11, 2011, among others, could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements made herein
and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. The Company does not
undertake an obligation to update its forward-looking statements to reflect future
events or circumstances.
1
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
82,642 |
|
|
$ |
84,843 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $2,423 and $1,986, respectively |
|
|
44,728 |
|
|
|
45,531 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,622 |
|
|
|
5,932 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
8,522 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
143,782 |
|
|
|
139,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures |
|
|
33,629 |
|
|
|
30,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,489 |
|
|
|
36,012 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(25,525 |
) |
|
|
(22,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
13,964 |
|
|
|
13,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Goodwill (Note 10) |
|
|
945,079 |
|
|
|
926,668 |
|
Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$172,695 and $153,123, respectively |
|
|
182,750 |
|
|
|
195,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,286,235 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 5) |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,201 |
|
|
|
3,790 |
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
9,010 |
|
|
|
16,854 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
11,973 |
|
|
|
11,052 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue |
|
|
48,992 |
|
|
|
41,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
76,299 |
|
|
|
76,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 5) |
|
|
202,281 |
|
|
|
289,092 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
12,343 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
35,324 |
|
|
|
40,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
327,591 |
|
|
|
418,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Notes 2 and 3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A non-voting common stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000
shares authorized; 1,429 shares and 791 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively, of which 90 shares and 154
shares are unvested, respectively |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized;
76,434 shares and 72,489 shares issued, respectively, and
75,946 shares and 72,001 shares outstanding,
respectively |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
819,291 |
|
|
|
750,857 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
42,819 |
|
|
|
32,699 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
101,575 |
|
|
|
78,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,463 |
|
|
|
863,002 |
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 488 shares |
|
|
(5,819 |
) |
|
|
(5,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
958,644 |
|
|
|
857,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,286,235 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
$ |
4,982 |
|
|
$ |
6,074 |
|
|
$ |
11,555 |
|
|
$ |
11,663 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
19,418 |
|
|
|
17,817 |
|
|
|
38,865 |
|
|
|
35,836 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
11,127 |
|
|
|
10,488 |
|
Software-enabled services |
|
|
61,543 |
|
|
|
52,628 |
|
|
|
119,263 |
|
|
|
101,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
91,803 |
|
|
|
81,618 |
|
|
|
180,810 |
|
|
|
159,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
Maintenance |
|
|
8,801 |
|
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
17,467 |
|
|
|
16,081 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
7,551 |
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
Software-enabled services |
|
|
31,155 |
|
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
|
61,739 |
|
|
|
53,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
45,637 |
|
|
|
40,940 |
|
|
|
90,132 |
|
|
|
80,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
46,166 |
|
|
|
40,678 |
|
|
|
90,678 |
|
|
|
79,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
7,018 |
|
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
13,908 |
|
|
|
12,635 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
9,053 |
|
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
17,025 |
|
|
|
15,619 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
6,546 |
|
|
|
13,743 |
|
|
|
12,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
23,271 |
|
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
44,676 |
|
|
|
40,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
22,895 |
|
|
|
19,789 |
|
|
|
46,002 |
|
|
|
39,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(3,474 |
) |
|
|
(8,058 |
) |
|
|
(8,601 |
) |
|
|
(17,075 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,480 |
) |
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
(5,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
34,352 |
|
|
|
16,655 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
11,490 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,028 |
|
|
$ |
4,362 |
|
|
$ |
22,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of
common shares outstanding |
|
|
76,724 |
|
|
|
70,960 |
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
|
65,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number
of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding |
|
|
80,880 |
|
|
|
74,538 |
|
|
|
79,756 |
|
|
|
69,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
22,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,383 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
20,990 |
|
|
|
20,297 |
|
Amortization of loan origination costs |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
Gain on sale or disposition of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(5,904 |
) |
|
|
(6,090 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
(2,423 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
818 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(857 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(9,236 |
) |
|
|
(10,914 |
) |
Income taxes receivable and payable |
|
|
(3,457 |
) |
|
|
(3,838 |
) |
Deferred maintenance and other revenues |
|
|
6,654 |
|
|
|
4,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
41,054 |
|
|
|
23,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(3,102 |
) |
|
|
(2,238 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(14,798 |
) |
|
|
(11,372 |
) |
Additions to capitalized software and other intangibles |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(18,975 |
) |
|
|
(13,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(87,833 |
) |
|
|
(81,597 |
) |
Proceeds from common stock issuance, net |
|
|
51,971 |
|
|
|
134,611 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
5,396 |
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(24,788 |
) |
|
|
60,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
69,831 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
84,843 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
82,642 |
|
|
$ |
88,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
8,446 |
|
|
$ |
16,826 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
$ |
15,606 |
|
|
$ |
10,861 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 9 for a discussion of acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is our top-level holding company. SS&C Technologies, Inc., or
SS&C, is our primary operating company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. We, us, our and the Company mean SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries, including SS&C.
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These accounting principles were
applied on a basis consistent with those of the audited consolidated financial statements contained
in SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 11, 2011 (the 2010
Form 10-K). In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments,
except as noted elsewhere in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements)
necessary for a fair statement of its financial position as of June 30, 2011, the results of its
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and its cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These statements do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. The financial statements contained
herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, which were included in the 2010 Form
10-K. The December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet data were derived from audited financial
statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. The
results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily
indicative of the expected results for the full year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 intends to enhance
comparability and transparency of other comprehensive income components. The guidance provides an
option to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of
other comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or two separate but consecutive
statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income components as
part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. The provisions of ASU 2011-05 will be
applied retrospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early
application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-05.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04
amends current fair value measurement and disclosure guidance to include increased transparency
around valuation inputs and investment categorization. The changes are effective prospectively for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of ASU 2011-04.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, which updates the guidance in Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805, Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29). The objective of
ASU 2010-29 is to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of the pro forma
revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. The amendments in ASU
2010-29 specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity
should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s)
that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior
annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to
include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments
directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and
earnings. This guidance is effective for business combinations with an acquisition date on or after
the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The
Company adopted this standard beginning January 1, 2011, and the adoption did not have a material
impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative
Carrying Amounts (ASU 2010-28). ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test so
that for those reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity is required to
perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not based on an assessment
of qualitative indicators that goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely
than not
that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse
qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. This guidance is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company
adopted this standard beginning January 1, 2011, and the adoption did not have a material impact on
its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
5
2. Equity and Stock-based Compensation
In February 2011, the Company completed a follow-on public offering of its common stock at an
offering price of $17.60 per share. The offering included 2,000,000 newly issued shares of common
stock sold by the Company and 9,000,000 existing shares of the Companys common stock sold by
selling stockholders. On March 9, 2011, the underwriters of the offering purchased an additional
1,100,000 shares of the Companys common stock to cover over-allotments. The Company received
total net proceeds from the offering, including the sale of shares to cover over-allotments, of
approximately $52.0 million, none of which relates to proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders.
In March 2011, the Companys Board of Directors established SS&Cs annual Earnings Before Interest,
Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) target range for the Companys 2011 fiscal year. As
of that date, the Company estimated the weighted-average fair value of the performance-based
options that vest upon the attainment of the 2011 EBITDA target range to be $11.41 per share. The
Company used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the option value: expected term
to exercise of 2.5 years; expected volatility of 38.0%; risk-free interest rate of 1.0%; and no
dividend yield. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Companys peer
group and the Company. Expected term to exercise is based on the Companys historical stock option
exercise experience.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded total stock-based compensation
expense of $3.6 million, of which $2.8 million related to the performance-based options based upon
managements assessment of the probability that the Companys EBITDA for 2011 will meet or exceed
the high end of the targeted range. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded
total stock-based compensation expense of $5.4 million, of which $3.6 million related to the
performance-based options based upon managements assessment of the probability that the Companys
EBITDA for 2011 will meet or exceed the high end of the targeted range. Time-based options
represented the remaining $0.8 million and $1.8 million of compensation expense recorded during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded total stock-based compensation
expense of $3.9 million, of which $3.0 million related to the performance-based options based upon
managements assessment of the probability that the Companys EBITDA for 2010 would meet or exceed
the high end of the targeted range. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded
total stock-based compensation expense of $5.2 million, of which $4.1 million related to the
performance-based options based upon managements assessment of the probability that the Companys
EBITDA for 2010 would meet or exceed the high end of the targeted range. Time-based options
represented the remaining $0.9 million and $1.1 million of compensation expense recorded during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated
statements of operations was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Statements of operations classification |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of maintenance |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
Cost of professional services |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Cost of software-enabled services |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
3,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
$ |
5,435 |
|
|
$ |
5,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
A summary of stock option activity as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common |
|
|
|
Stock Underlying |
|
|
|
Options |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
12,182,192 |
|
Granted |
|
|
186,250 |
|
Cancelled/forfeited |
|
|
(52,201 |
) |
Exercised |
|
|
(1,482,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
10,834,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Comprehensive Income
Items defined as comprehensive income, such as foreign currency translation adjustments and
unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps qualifying as hedges, are separately classified in
the financial statements. The accumulated balance of other comprehensive income is reported
separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of the
balance sheet. Total comprehensive income consists of net income and other accumulated
comprehensive income disclosed in the equity section of the balance sheet.
The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,028 |
|
|
$ |
4,362 |
|
|
$ |
22,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,383 |
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
(11,632 |
) |
|
|
10,120 |
|
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
15,167 |
|
|
$ |
(6,578 |
) |
|
$ |
32,982 |
|
|
$ |
11,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. Basic
earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income available to the
Companys common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common
equivalent shares consist of stock options and restricted shares using the treasury stock method.
Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if the
effect of including such common equivalent shares is antidilutive because their exercise prices
together with other assumed proceeds exceed the average fair value of common stock during the
period.
The following table sets forth the weighted average common shares used in the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
76,724 |
|
|
|
70,960 |
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
|
65,900 |
|
Weighted average common stock equivalents
options and restricted shares |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding |
|
|
80,800 |
|
|
|
74,538 |
|
|
|
79,756 |
|
|
|
69,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 289,075 and 2,043,033 shares were outstanding for the three months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and options to purchase 237,060 and 1,237,950 shares were
outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, but were not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect of including the options would be
antidilutive.
7
5. Debt
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Senior credit facility, term loan portion, weighted-average interest
rate of 2.38% and 2.55%, respectively |
|
$ |
137,105 |
|
|
$ |
157,499 |
|
11 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2013 |
|
|
66,625 |
|
|
|
133,250 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,752 |
|
|
|
290,794 |
|
Less: Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
(1,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
202,281 |
|
|
$ |
289,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized financing costs of $0.4 million and $0.6 million were amortized to interest expense
during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Capitalized financing costs of
$0.9 million and $1.1 million were amortized to interest expense during the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The estimated fair value of the Companys senior subordinated notes due 2013 was $68.5 million and
$137.8 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The carrying value of the
Companys senior credit facility approximates its fair value.
In February 2011, the Company issued a notice of redemption for $66.6 million in principal amount
of its outstanding
11 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 102.9375% of the principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such amount to, but excluding, March 17, 2011, the day
such redemption was completed. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2.9
million in connection with the redemption, which includes the redemption premium of $2.0 million
and $0.9 million relating to the write-off of capitalized financing costs attributable to the
redeemed notes.
6. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The Company has utilized interest rate swap agreements to manage the floating rate portion of its
debt portfolio and follows the provisions of the accounting standard for derivative instruments and
hedging activities, which requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet
at fair value.
Quarterly variable interest payments were recognized as an increase in interest expense as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,135 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,267 |
|
Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are not included in earnings but are reported
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The change in the fair value of
the interest rate swaps was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change in fair value recognized in AOCI,
net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,186 |
|
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding interest rate swap agreements. As of June 30,
2010, the Company held one receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate swap with a notional value of
$100 million, which expired on December 31, 2010.
8
7. Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows the provisions of the accounting standard for fair value measurements with
respect to the valuation of
its interest rate swap agreements. The fair value measurement standard clarifies that companies are
required to use a fair value measure for recognition and disclosure by establishing a common
definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, and that companies are required
to expand disclosures about fair value measurements.
The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosure establishes a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:
Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of June 30, 2011, the Companys contingent consideration liability of $1.8 million associated
with the acquisition of BenefitsXML, Inc. (BXML) was measured at fair value based on the
potential payments of the liability associated with the unobservable input of the estimated
post-acquisition financial results of BXML through February 28, 2013 and, therefore, is a Level 3
liability. See Footnote 9 for further discussion of acquisitions. There was no change in the
estimated fair value from the acquisition date through June 30, 2011.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the normal
course of its business. In the opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any litigation
or proceedings by third parties that management believes could have a material adverse effect on
the Company or its business.
9. Acquisitions
On March 10, 2011, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of BXML for approximately
$15.1 million in cash, plus the costs of effecting the transaction and the assumption of certain
liabilities. BXML provides technology solutions for employee benefit plan providers.
The net assets and results of operations of BXML have been included in the Companys consolidated
financial statements from March 11, 2011. The purchase price was allocated to tangible and
intangible assets based on their fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of the
intangible assets, consisting of completed technology, trade name and client contracts, was
determined using the income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method was utilized for
the completed technology and trade name, and the discounted cash flows method was utilized for the
contractual relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year based on the ratio that
the projected cash flows for the intangible assets bear to the total of current and expected future
cash flows for the intangible assets. The completed technology is amortized over approximately five
years, contractual relationships are amortized over approximately five years and trade name is
amortized over approximately seven years, the estimated lives of the assets. The Company has
recorded a contingent consideration liability of $1.8 million, which is based on the attainment of
certain revenue and EBITDA targets by the acquired business through February 28, 2013. The total
possible undiscounted payments could range from zero to $3.0 million. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill and is tax deductible (excluding the portion relating to the
contingent consideration liability, which is not deductible until paid).
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition of BXML (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
462 |
|
Tangible assets acquired, net of cash received |
|
|
79 |
|
Acquired customer relationships and contracts |
|
|
3,700 |
|
Completed technology |
|
|
1,600 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
100 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10,984 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(190 |
) |
Other liabilities assumed |
|
|
(1,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash received |
|
$ |
14,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of acquired accounts receivable balances for BXML approximates the contractual
amounts due from acquired customers.
9
The Company reported revenues of $1.9 million and pretax earnings of $1.1 million from BXML from
the acquisition date through June 30, 2011. The following unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated results of operations are provided for
illustrative purposes only and assume that the acquisition of BXML, PC Consulting d/b/a
TimeShareWare (TSW), thinkorswim Technologies, Inc. (TOS) and Geller Investment Partnership
Services (GIPS) occurred on January 1, 2010. This unaudited pro forma information (in thousands)
should not be relied upon as being indicative of the historical results that would have been
obtained if the acquisitions had actually occurred on that date, nor of the results that may be
obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
91,803 |
|
|
$ |
88,002 |
|
|
$ |
181,818 |
|
|
$ |
171,451 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,028 |
|
|
$ |
6,110 |
|
|
$ |
23,022 |
|
|
$ |
15,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Basic weighted average
number of common shares
outstanding |
|
|
76,724 |
|
|
|
70,960 |
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
|
65,900 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
Diluted weighted average
number of common and common
equivalent shares
outstanding |
|
|
80,800 |
|
|
|
74,538 |
|
|
|
79,756 |
|
|
|
69,424 |
|
10. Goodwill
The change in carrying value of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
926,668 |
|
Adjustments to prior acquisition |
|
|
732 |
|
2011 acquisition |
|
|
10,984 |
|
Income tax benefit on rollover options exercised |
|
|
(2,804 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
9,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
945,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Product and Geographic Sales Information
The Company operates in one reportable segment. The Company attributes net sales to an individual
country based upon location of the customer. The Company manages its business primarily on a
geographic basis. The Companys geographic regions consist of the United States, Canada, Americas
excluding the United States and Canada, Europe and Asia Pacific and Japan. The European region
includes European countries as well as the Middle East and Africa.
Revenues by geography were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
63,037 |
|
|
$ |
54,596 |
|
|
$ |
124,555 |
|
|
$ |
106,711 |
|
Canada |
|
|
13,537 |
|
|
|
12,674 |
|
|
|
26,776 |
|
|
|
24,359 |
|
Americas excluding United States and Canada |
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
Europe |
|
|
9,756 |
|
|
|
10,172 |
|
|
|
19,566 |
|
|
|
21,569 |
|
Asia Pacific and Japan |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
4,939 |
|
|
|
3,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91,803 |
|
|
$ |
81,618 |
|
|
$ |
180,810 |
|
|
$ |
159,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Revenues by product group were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Portfolio management/accounting |
|
$ |
71,533 |
|
|
$ |
65,326 |
|
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
127,551 |
|
Trading/treasury operations |
|
|
10,621 |
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
21,151 |
|
|
|
20,160 |
|
Financial modeling |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
3,936 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
Loan management/accounting |
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
Property management |
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
Money market processing |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
Training |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91,803 |
|
|
$ |
81,618 |
|
|
$ |
180,810 |
|
|
$ |
159,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by our
management, and such judgments are reflected in the amounts reported in our consolidated financial
statements. In applying these policies, our management uses its judgment to determine the
appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of estimates. Those estimates are based on
our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, managements observation of trends in the
industry, information provided by our clients and information available from other outside sources,
as appropriate. Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates contained in our
consolidated financial statements. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting
estimates and assumptions or the judgments affecting the application of those estimates and
assumptions since our filing of the 2010 Form 10-K. Our critical accounting policies are described
in the 2010 Form 10-K and include:
|
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
|
|
|
Acquisition Accounting |
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
The following table sets forth revenues (in thousands) and changes in revenues for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
$ |
4,982 |
|
|
$ |
6,074 |
|
|
|
-18 |
% |
|
$ |
11,555 |
|
|
$ |
11,663 |
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
Maintenance |
|
|
19,418 |
|
|
|
17,817 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
38,865 |
|
|
|
35,836 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
11,127 |
|
|
|
10,488 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Software-enabled services |
|
|
61,543 |
|
|
|
52,628 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
119,263 |
|
|
|
101,805 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
91,803 |
|
|
$ |
81,618 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
180,810 |
|
|
$ |
159,792 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the percentage of our revenues represented by each of the following
sources of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Maintenance |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Professional services |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Software-enabled services |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Revenues
Our revenues consist primarily of software-enabled services and maintenance revenues, and, to a
lesser degree, software license and professional services revenues. As a general matter, our
software license and professional services revenues fluctuate based on the number of new licensing
clients, while fluctuations in our software-enabled services revenues are
attributable to the number of new software-enabled services clients, the number of outsourced
transactions provided to our existing clients and total assets under management in our clients
portfolios. Maintenance revenues vary based on the rate by which we add or lose maintenance
clients over time and, to a lesser extent, on the annual increases in maintenance fees, which are
generally derived from the consumer price index.
Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $91.8 million compared to $81.6 million for
the same period in 2010. The revenue increase of $10.2 million, or 12%, was primarily due to
revenues from products and services that we acquired through our acquisitions of TOS in October
2010, TSW in December 2010 and BXML in March 2011, which added $5.4 million in revenues in the
aggregate, and an increase of $3.4 million in revenues for businesses and products that we have
owned for at least 12 months, or organic revenues. The favorable impact from foreign currency
translation accounted for $1.4 million of the increase, resulting from the weakness of the U.S.
dollar relative to currencies such as the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Australian dollar
and the euro. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $180.8 million compared to
$159.8 million for the same period in 2010. The revenue increase of $21.0 million, or 13%, was
primarily due to revenues from products and services that we acquired through our acquisitions of
GIPS in February 2010, TOS in October 2010, TSW in December 2010 and BXML in March 2011, which
added $9.7 million in revenues in the aggregate, and an increase of $8.8 million in organic
revenues. The favorable impact from foreign currency translation accounted for $2.5 million of the
increase, resulting from the weakness of the U.S. dollar relative to currencies such as the
Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Australian dollar and the euro.
Software Licenses. Software license revenues were $5.0 million and $6.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in software license revenues of
$1.1 million, or 18%, was primarily due to a decrease of $2.2 million in organic software license
revenues, partially offset by revenues from acquisitions, which contributed $1.1 million. Software
license revenues were $11.6 million and $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The decrease in software license revenues of $0.1 million, or 1%, was primarily
due to a decrease of $1.4 million in organic software license revenues, partially offset by
revenues from acquisitions, which contributed $1.2 million, and a favorable impact from foreign
currency translation of $0.1 million. Software license revenues will vary depending on the timing,
size and nature of our license transactions. For example, the average size of our software license
transactions and the number of large transactions may fluctuate on a period-to-period basis. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, revenues from term licenses increased while the
average size and number of perpetual license transactions decreased from those for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010. Additionally, software license revenues will vary among the various
products that we offer, due to differences such as the timing of new releases and variances in
economic conditions affecting opportunities in the vertical markets served by such products.
Maintenance. Maintenance revenues were $19.4 million and $17.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in maintenance revenues of $1.6 million, or 9%,
was primarily due to revenue from acquisitions, which contributed $1.1 million in the aggregate, a
favorable impact from foreign currency translation of $0.3 million and an increase in organic
maintenance revenues of $0.2 million. Maintenance revenues were $38.9 million and $35.8 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in maintenance revenues of
$3.1 million, or 8%, was primarily due to revenues from acquisitions, which contributed $2.4
million in the aggregate, a favorable impact from foreign currency translation of $0.4 million and
an increase in organic maintenance revenues of $0.3 million. We typically provide maintenance
services under one-year renewable contracts that provide for an annual increase in fees, which are
generally derived from the percentage change in the consumer price index. Future maintenance
revenue growth is dependent on our ability to retain existing clients, add new license clients and
increase average maintenance fees.
Professional Services. Professional services revenues were $5.9 million and $5.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase of $0.8 million, or 15%, was
primarily due to revenues from acquisitions, which contributed $1.0 million in the aggregate, and a
favorable impact from foreign currency translation of $0.1 million, partially offset by a decrease
of $0.3 million in organic professional services revenues. Professional services revenues were
$11.1 million and $10.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
increase of $0.6 million, or 6%, was primarily due to revenues from acquisitions, which contributed
$1.7 million in the aggregate, and a favorable impact from foreign currency translation of $0.2
million, partially offset by a decrease of $1.3 million in organic professional services revenues.
Our overall software license revenue levels and market demand for professional services will
continue to have an effect on our professional services revenues.
Software-Enabled Services. Software-enabled services revenues were $61.5 million and $52.6 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in software-enabled
services revenues of $8.9 million, or 17%, was primarily due to an increase of $5.7 million in
organic software-enabled services revenues, revenues from acquisitions, which contributed $2.2
million in the aggregate, and a favorable impact from foreign currency translation of $1.0 million.
Software-enabled services revenues were $119.3 million and $101.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in software-enabled services revenues of $17.5
million, or 17%, was primarily due to an
increase of $11.3 million in organic software-enabled services revenues, revenues from
acquisitions, which contributed $4.4 million in the aggregate, and a favorable impact from foreign
currency translation of $1.8 million. Future software-enabled services revenue growth is dependent
on our ability to retain existing clients, add new clients and increase average fees.
13
Cost of Revenues
Total cost of revenues was $45.6 million and $40.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. The gross margin was 50% for each of the three-month periods ended June 30,
2011 and 2010. Our costs of revenues increased by $4.7 million, or 11%, primarily as a result of
an increase of $2.5 million in costs to support organic revenue growth, our acquisitions, which
added cost of revenues of $1.2 million in the aggregate, an increase in costs of $0.7 million
related to the unfavorable effect of foreign currency translation and an increase in amortization
expense of $0.5 million, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $0.2
million. Total cost of revenues was $90.1 million and $80.1 million for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The gross margin was 50% for each of the six-month periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010. Our costs of revenues increased by $10.0 million, or 13%, primarily as a
result of an increase of $5.4 million in costs to support organic revenue growth, our acquisitions,
which added cost of revenues of $2.7 million in the aggregate, an increase in costs of $1.3 million
related to the unfavorable effect of foreign currency translation and an increase in amortization
expense of $0.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation of $0.1
million.
Cost of Software Licenses. Cost of software license revenues consists primarily of amortization
expense of completed technology, royalties, third-party software, and the costs of product media,
packaging and documentation. The cost of software license revenues was $1.7 million and $1.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cost of
software licenses was primarily due to a reduction of $0.2 million in amortization expense. Cost of
software license revenues as a percentage of such revenues was 34% and 31% for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cost of software license revenues was $3.4
million and $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
decrease in cost of software licenses was primarily due to a reduction of $0.4 million in
amortization expense. Cost of software license revenues as a percentage of such revenues was 29%
and 33% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cost of Maintenance. Cost of maintenance revenues consists primarily of technical client support,
costs associated with the distribution of products and regulatory updates and amortization of
intangible assets. The cost of maintenance revenues was $8.8 million and $8.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cost of maintenance
revenues of $0.7 million, or 9%, was primarily due to additional amortization expense of $0.4
million, our acquisitions, which added $0.2 million in costs in the aggregate, and an increase in
costs of $0.1 million related to foreign currency translation. Cost of maintenance revenues as a
percentage of these revenues was 45% for each of the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and
2010. The cost of maintenance revenues was $17.5 million and $16.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cost of maintenance revenues of $1.4
million, or 9%, was primarily due to additional amortization expense of $0.8 million, our
acquisitions, which added $0.4 million in costs in the aggregate, and an increase in costs of $0.2
million related to foreign currency translation. Cost of maintenance revenues as a percentage of
these revenues was 45% for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Cost of Professional Services. Cost of professional services revenues consists primarily of the
cost related to personnel utilized to provide implementation, conversion and training services to
our software licensees, as well as system integration, custom programming and actuarial consulting
services. The cost of professional services revenues was $4.0 million and $3.3 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in costs of professional
services revenues of $0.7 million, or 22%, was primarily related to an increase of $0.5 million in
personnel costs to support projects, our acquisitions, which added $0.2 million in costs in the
aggregate, and an increase in costs of $0.1 million related to foreign currency translation,
partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $0.1 million. Cost of
professional services revenues as a percentage of these revenues was 68% for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 compared to 64% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The cost of professional
services revenues was $7.6 million and $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively. The increase in costs of professional services revenues of $1.0 million, or
14%, was primarily related to our acquisitions, which added $0.6 million in costs in the aggregate,
an increase in costs of $0.2 million related to foreign currency translation and an increase of
$0.2 million in personnel costs to support projects. Cost of professional services revenues as a
percentage of these revenues was 68% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 63% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010.
14
Cost of Software-Enabled Services. Cost of software-enabled services revenues consists primarily
of the cost related to personnel utilized in servicing our software-enabled services clients and
amortization of intangible assets. The cost of software-enabled services revenues was $31.2
million and $27.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
increase in costs of software-enabled services revenues of $3.5 million, or 13%, was primarily
related to
an increase of $2.0 million in costs to support the growth of organic software-enabled services
revenues, our acquisitions, which added $0.8 million in costs in the aggregate, an increase in
costs of $0.5 million related to foreign currency translation and an increase in costs of $0.3
million related to amortization expense, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation
expense of $0.1 million. Cost of software-enabled services revenues as a percentage of these
revenues was 51% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 53% for the three months
ended June 30, 2010. The cost of software-enabled services revenues was $61.7 million and $53.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in costs of
software-enabled services revenues of $8.1 million, or 15%, was primarily related to an increase of
$5.2 million in costs to support the growth of organic software-enabled services revenues, our
acquisitions, which added $1.8 million in costs in the aggregate, an increase in costs of $0.9
million related to foreign currency translation and an increase in costs of $0.3 million related to
amortization expense, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $0.1
million. Cost of software-enabled services revenues as a percentage of these revenues was 52% for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 53% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses were $23.3 million and $20.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in total operating expenses of $2.4 million, or 11%, was
primarily due to our acquisitions of TOS, TSW and BXML, which added $1.6 million in costs in the
aggregate, an increase in costs of $0.4 million related to foreign currency translation and an
increase in costs of $0.4 million to support organic revenue growth. Total operating expenses as a
percentage of total revenues were 25% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 26% for
the three months ended June 30, 2010. Total operating expenses were $44.7 million and $40.5 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in total operating
expenses of $4.2 million, or 10%, was primarily due to our acquisitions of GIPS, TOS, TSW and BXML,
which added $3.1 million in costs in the aggregate, an increase in costs of $0.6 million related to
foreign currency translation and an increase in costs of $0.3 million related to stock-based
compensation. Total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 25% for each of the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of the personnel costs
associated with the selling and marketing of our products, including salaries, commissions and
travel and entertainment. Such expenses also include amortization of intangible assets, the cost of
branch sales offices, trade shows and marketing and promotional materials. Selling and marketing
expenses were $7.0 million and $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, representing 8% of total revenues in each of those periods. The increase in selling
and marketing expenses of $0.5 million, or 8%, was primarily related to our acquisitions, which
added $0.3 million in costs, and an increase in costs of $0.2 million related to foreign currency
translation. Selling and marketing expenses were $13.9 million and $12.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing 8% of total revenues in those
periods. The increase in selling and marketing expenses of $1.3 million, or 10%, was primarily
related to our acquisitions, which added $0.9 million in costs and an increase in costs of $0.4
million related to foreign currency translation.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs
attributable to the enhancement of existing products and the development of new software products.
Research and development expenses were $9.1 million and $7.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing 10% of total revenues in each of those periods.
The increase in research and development expenses of $1.2 million, or 15%, was primarily related to
our acquisitions, which added $1.0 million in costs in the aggregate, and an increase in costs of
$0.2 million related to foreign currency translation. Research and development expenses were $17.0
million and $15.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively,
representing 9% and 10% of total revenues in those periods, respectively. The increase in research
and development expenses of $1.4 million, or 9%, was primarily related to our acquisitions, which
added $1.6 million in costs in the aggregate, and an increase in costs of $0.3 million related to
foreign currency translation, partially offset by a decrease in costs of $0.5 million as more costs
were eligible for capitalization in 2011 compared to 2010.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel
costs related to management, accounting and finance, information management, human resources and
administration and associated overhead costs, as well as fees for professional services. General
and administrative expenses were $7.2 million and $6.5 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively, representing 8% of total revenues in each of those periods. The
increase in general and administrative expenses of $0.7 million, or 10%, was primarily related to
our acquisitions, which added $0.3 million in costs in the aggregate, an increase of $0.3 million
in costs to support organic revenue growth and an increase in costs of $0.1 million related to
foreign currency translation. General and administrative expenses were $13.7 million and $12.2
million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing 8% of total
revenues in each of those periods. The increase in general and administrative expenses of $1.5
million, or 12%, was primarily related to our acquisitions, which added $0.6 million in costs in
the aggregate, an increase of $0.5 million in
costs to support organic revenue growth, an increase in costs of $0.3 million related to
stock-based compensation and an increase in costs of $0.1 million related to foreign currency
translation.
15
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was
$3.5 million and $8.1 million, respectively. Net interest expense for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010 was $8.6 million and $17.1 million, respectively. Net interest expense is
primarily related to interest expense on debt outstanding under our senior credit facility and 11
3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2013. The decrease in interest expense of $4.6 million for the
three-month period and $8.5 million for the six-month period reflects the lower average debt
balance resulting from net repayments of debt, including the partial redemptions of our senior
subordinated notes in April 2010 and March 2011 (discussed further in Liquidity and Capital
Resources).
Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income, net for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
consisted primarily of foreign currency gains. Other expense, net for the six months ended June 30,
2011 consisted of foreign currency losses and fees associated with the redemption of our 11 3/4%
senior subordinated notes due 2013, which is discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources,
partially offset by a refund of facilities charges.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30,
2011 consisted of $2.0 million in note redemption premiums and $0.9 million from the write-offs of
deferred financing costs associated with the redemption of $66.6 million of our 11 3/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013, which is discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources. Loss
on extinguishment of debt for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted of $4.2
million in note redemption premiums and $1.3 million for the write-offs of deferred financing costs
associated with the redemption of $71.75 million of our 11 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2013
during the period.
Provision for Income Taxes. We had effective tax rates of 33.3% and 31.5% for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We had effective tax rates of 33.4% and 19.6% for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The lower effective tax rate for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 was due to the 2010 reversal of uncertain income tax positions, refunds
and enacted rate changes in the three months ended March 31, 2010. Our effective tax rate includes
the effect of operations outside the United States, which historically have been taxed at rates
lower than the U.S. statutory rate. While we have income from multiple foreign sources, the
majority of our non-U.S. operations are in Canada and the United Kingdom, where we anticipate the
statutory rates to be between 26% and 28% for the year ended December 31, 2011. Additionally, the
foreign effective tax rate is benefited by certain other permanent items, such as enacted rate
changes. The expected effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011 is forecasted to be
between 33% and 34%. A future proportionate change in the composition of income before income taxes
from foreign and domestic tax jurisdictions could impact our periodic effective tax rate.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal cash requirements are to finance the costs of our operations pending the billing and
collection of client receivables, to fund payments with respect to our indebtedness, to invest in
research and development and to acquire complementary businesses or assets. We expect our cash on
hand and cash flows from operations to provide sufficient liquidity to fund our current
obligations, projected working capital requirements and capital spending for at least the next
twelve months.
Our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2011 were $82.6 million, a decrease of $2.2 million from
$84.8 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease in cash is due primarily to net repayments of debt
and cash used for an acquisition and capital expenditures, partially offset by net proceeds of
$52.0 million from our follow-on public offering of common stock in February 2011 and cash provided
by operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $41.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income of $22.9 million adjusted for
non-cash items of $23.0 million, partially offset by changes in our working capital accounts
totaling $4.8 million. The changes in our working capital accounts were driven by decreases in
accrued expenses and other liabilities and increases in income tax receivables and prepaid expenses
and other assets, partially offset by increases in deferred revenues and accounts payable and a
decrease in accounts receivable. The decrease in accrued expenses was primarily due to the payment
of annual employee bonuses. The increase in deferred revenues was primarily due to the collection
of annual maintenance fees. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to the
improvement in days sales outstanding.
Investing activities used net cash of $19.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011,
primarily related to $14.8 million cash paid for our acquisition of BMXL, $3.1 million in cash paid
for capital expenditures and $1.1 million in cash paid for capitalized software.
16
Financing activities used net cash of $24.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011,
representing $87.8 million in repayments of debt, partially offset by $52.0 million in net proceeds
from our follow-on offering, proceeds of $6.2 million from stock option exercises and income tax
windfall benefits of $4.8 million related to the exercise of stock options. The repayment of debt
during the period reflects our use of proceeds from our follow-on offering and available cash to
redeem $66.6 million in principal amount of our outstanding 11 3/4% senior subordinated notes due
2013 at a redemption price of 102.9375% of principal amount.
We have made a permanent reinvestment determination in certain non-U.S. operations that have
historically generated positive operating cash flows. At June 30, 2011, we held approximately $10.6
million in cash and cash equivalents at non-U.S. subsidiaries where we had made such a
determination and in turn no provision for U.S. income taxes had been made. As of June 30, 2011, we
believe we have sufficient foreign tax credits available to offset tax obligations associated with
repatriation of these funds.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or
future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
investors.
Senior Credit Facilities
SS&Cs borrowings under the senior credit facilities bear interest at either a floating base rate
or a Eurocurrency rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin. In addition, SS&C pays a
commitment fee in respect of unused revolving commitments at a rate that is adjusted based on its
leverage ratio. SS&C is obligated to make quarterly principal payments on the term loan totaling
$1.4 million per year. Subject to certain exceptions, thresholds and other limitations, SS&C is
required to prepay outstanding loans under the senior credit facilities with the net proceeds of
certain asset dispositions and certain debt issuances and 50% of its excess cash flow (as defined
in the agreements governing the senior credit facilities), which percentage will be reduced if SS&C
reaches certain leverage ratio thresholds.
The obligations under SS&Cs senior credit facilities are guaranteed by us and all of SS&Cs
existing and future material wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries, with certain exceptions as set forth
in the credit agreement. The obligations of the Canadian borrower are guaranteed by us, SS&C and
each of SS&Cs U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit
agreement. The obligations under the senior credit facilities are secured by a perfected first
priority security interest in all of SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or other
equity interests held by us, SS&C and each of SS&Cs existing and future U.S. subsidiary guarantors
(subject to certain limitations for equity interests of foreign subsidiaries and other exceptions
as set forth in the credit agreement) and all of our and SS&Cs tangible and intangible assets and
the tangible and intangible assets of each of SS&Cs existing and future U.S. subsidiary
guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement. The Canadian borrowers
borrowings under the senior credit facilities and all guarantees thereof are secured by a perfected
first priority security interest in all of SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by us, SS&C and each of SS&Cs existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement, and all of our
and SS&Cs tangible and intangible assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each of SS&Cs
existing and future U.S. and Canadian subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth
in the credit agreement.
The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict,
subject to certain exceptions, SS&Cs (and its restricted subsidiaries) ability to incur
additional indebtedness, pay dividends and distributions on capital stock, create liens on assets,
enter into sale and lease-back transactions, repay subordinated indebtedness, make capital
expenditures, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, dispose of assets and engage in
mergers or acquisitions. In addition, under the senior credit facilities, SS&C is required to
satisfy and maintain a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. SS&C was
in compliance with all covenants at June 30, 2011.
11 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013
The 11 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2013 are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of SS&C
that are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt, including the
senior credit facilities. The senior subordinated notes will be pari passu in right of payment to
all future senior subordinated debt.
17
The senior subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in part, at SS&Cs option, at any time at
varying redemption prices that generally include premiums, which are defined in the indenture
governing the senior subordinated notes. In
addition, upon a change of control, SS&C is required to make an offer to redeem all of the senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof
plus accrued and unpaid interest. In March 2011, SS&C redeemed $66.6 million in principal amount of
its outstanding 113/4 % senior subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 102.9375% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such amount to, but excluding, March 17,
2011, the date of the redemption.
The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains a number of covenants including,
among others, covenants that restrict, subject to certain exceptions, SS&Cs ability and the
ability of its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, make
certain investments, create liens, dispose of certain assets and engage in mergers or acquisitions.
Covenant Compliance
Under the senior credit facilities, SS&C is required to satisfy and maintain specified financial
ratios and other financial condition tests. As of June 30, 2011, SS&C was in compliance with the
financial and non-financial covenants. SS&Cs continued ability to meet these financial ratios and
tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that SS&C will
continue to meet these ratios and tests. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a
default under the senior credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of any event of default under the
senior credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the
senior credit facilities to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend
further credit.
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used in key financial covenants contained in
the senior credit facilities, which are material facilities supporting our capital structure and
providing liquidity to our business. Consolidated EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), further adjusted to exclude unusual items and other
adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under the senior credit facilities. We
believe that the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting
Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate
compliance with the specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests contained in the
senior credit facilities.
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA to gauge the costs of our capital structure on a day-to-day
basis when full financial statements are unavailable. Management further believes that providing
this information allows our investors greater transparency and a better understanding of our
ability to meet our debt service obligations and make capital expenditures.
A breach of any of the covenants in the senior credit facilities that are tied to ratios based on
Consolidated EBITDA could result in a default under that agreement, in which case the lenders could
elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable and to terminate any commitments they have to
provide further borrowings. Any such acceleration would also result in a default under the
indenture governing the 11 3/4% senior subordinated notes due 2013. Any such default and subsequent
acceleration of payments under our debt agreements would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Additionally, under our debt agreements,
our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making investments
and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on Consolidated EBITDA.
Consolidated EBITDA does not represent net income or cash flow from operations as those terms are
defined by GAAP and does not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund
cash needs. Further, the senior credit facilities require that Consolidated EBITDA be calculated
for the most recent four fiscal quarters. As a result, the measure can be disproportionately
affected by a particularly strong or weak quarter. Further, it may not be comparable to the measure
for any subsequent four-quarter period or any complete fiscal year.
Consolidated EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP, and investors should not consider
Consolidated EBITDA as a substitute for measures of our financial performance and liquidity as
determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net income, operating income or net cash provided by
operating activities. Because other companies may calculate Consolidated EBITDA differently than we
do, Consolidated EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. Consolidated EBITDA has other limitations as an analytical tool, when compared to the
use of net income (loss), which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, including:
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the provision of income tax expense in our various
jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense we incur as a
result of our debt leverage; |
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect any attribution of costs to our operations related
to our investments and capital expenditures through depreciation and amortization charges;
|
18
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the cost of compensation we provide to our
employees in the form of stock option awards; and |
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA excludes expenses that we believe are unusual or non-recurring, but
which others may believe are normal expenses for the operation of a business. |
The following is a reconciliation of net income to Consolidated EBITDA (in thousands) as defined in
the senior credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Twelve Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,028 |
|
|
$ |
4,362 |
|
|
$ |
22,862 |
|
|
$ |
13,383 |
|
|
$ |
41,892 |
|
Interest expense (1) |
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
13,538 |
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
22,555 |
|
|
|
24,819 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
11,490 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
20,252 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,612 |
|
|
|
10,184 |
|
|
|
20,990 |
|
|
|
20,297 |
|
|
|
41,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
33,626 |
|
|
|
30,088 |
|
|
|
66,824 |
|
|
|
59,507 |
|
|
|
128,384 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments (2) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Unusual or non-recurring charges (3) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
2,856 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
13,457 |
|
Capital-based taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
Other (5) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA |
|
$ |
37,403 |
|
|
$ |
33,826 |
|
|
$ |
73,397 |
|
|
$ |
65,593 |
|
|
$ |
145,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest expense includes loss from extinguishment of debt shown as a separate line item on
our Statement of Operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments include (a) an adjustment to increase revenues by the amount
that would have been recognized if deferred revenue were not adjusted to fair value at the
date of acquisitions and (b) an adjustment to increase rent expense by the amount that would
have been recognized if lease obligations were not adjusted to fair value at the date of
acquisitions. |
|
(3) |
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges include foreign currency gains and losses, severance
expenses, proceeds from legal and other settlements and other expenses, such as expenses
associated with the bond redemption, acquisitions and facility refund. |
|
(4) |
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings reflects the EBITDA impact of significant businesses that
were acquired during the period as if the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period
and cost savings to be realized from such acquisitions. |
|
(5) |
|
Other includes management fees and related expenses paid to The Carlyle Group and the
non-cash portion of straight-line rent expense. |
The covenant restricting capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2011 limits
expenditures to $23.7 million. Actual capital expenditures through June 30, 2011 were $3.1
million. The covenant requirements for total leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio
and the actual ratios for the twelve months ended June 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio(1) |
|
|
5.50 |
x |
|
|
1.20 |
x |
Minimum Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest coverage ratio |
|
|
2.25 |
x |
|
|
7.24 |
x |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as the ratio of funded debt, less cash on hand up to a maximum of $30.0 million,
to Consolidated EBITDA, as defined by the senior credit facility, for the period of four
consecutive fiscal quarters ended on the measurement date. Funded debt is comprised of
indebtedness for borrowed money, notes, bonds or similar instruments, and capital lease
obligations. This covenant is applied at the end of each quarter. |
19
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05
intends to enhance comparability and transparency of other comprehensive income components. The
guidance provides an option to present total comprehensive income, the components of net income and
the components of other comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or two separate but
consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income
components as part of the statement of changes in shareowners equity. The provisions of ASU
2011-05 will be applied retrospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2011. Early application is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-05.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04
amends current fair value measurement and disclosure guidance to include increased transparency
around valuation inputs and investment categorization. The changes are effective prospectively for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We are currently evaluating the
impact of ASU 2011-04.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, which updates the guidance in ASC Topic 805,
Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29). The objective of ASU 2010-29 is to address diversity in
practice regarding the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements
for business combinations. The amendments in ASU 2010-29 specify that if a public entity presents
comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined
entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as
of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand
the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of
material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination
included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This guidance is effective for business
combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We adopted this standard beginning January 1, 2011,
and the adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative
Carrying Amounts (ASU 2010-28). ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test so that
for those reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity is required to perform
Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not based on an assessment of
qualitative indicators that goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely
than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse
qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted this
standard beginning January 1, 2011, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We have
invested our available cash in short-term, highly liquid financial instruments, having initial
maturities of three months or less. When necessary, we have borrowed to fund acquisitions.
At June 30, 2011, excluding capital leases, we had total debt of $203.7 million, including $137.1
million of variable interest rate debt.
At June 30, 2011, $13.1 million of our debt was denominated in Canadian dollars. We expect that our
foreign denominated debt will be serviced through our Canadian operations.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 31% of our revenues were from clients
located outside the United States. A portion of the revenues from clients located outside the
United States is denominated in foreign currencies, the majority being denominated in the Canadian
dollar. While revenues and expenses of our foreign operations are primarily denominated in their
respective local currencies, some of our subsidiaries do enter into certain transactions in
currencies other than their functional currency. These transactions consist primarily of
cross-currency intercompany balances and trade receivables and payables. As a result of these
transactions, we have exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates that result in foreign
currency transaction gains or losses, which we report in other income (expense). These outstanding
amounts were reduced during 2010, and we do not believe that our foreign currency transaction gains
or losses will be material during 2011. The amount of these balances may fluctuate in the future as
we bill customers and buy products or services in currencies other than our functional currency,
which could increase our exposure to foreign currency exchange
rates in the future. We continue to monitor our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates as a
result of our foreign currency denominated debt, our acquisitions and changes in our operations. We
do not enter into any market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes.
20
The foregoing risk management discussion and the effect thereof are forward-looking statements.
Actual results in the future may differ materially from these projected results due to actual
developments in global financial markets. The analytical methods used by us to assess and minimize
risk discussed above should not be considered projections of future events or losses.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer
(our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. The term disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures of a company that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management
necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30,
2011, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June
30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material changes to our Risk Factors as previously disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits are filed as part of
this Report.
21
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
Date: August 12, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
22
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.1 |
|
|
Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2011, by PC
Consulting, Inc. in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 14,
2011 (File No. 001-34675) (the April 14, 2011 Form 8-K) |
|
10.2 |
|
|
Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2011, by
BenefitsXML, Inc. in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
April 14, 2011 Form 8-K |
|
10.3 |
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2011,
among SS&C Technologies, Inc., PC Consulting, Inc. and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the April 14, 2011
Form 8-K |
|
10.4 |
|
|
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2011,
among SS&C Technologies, Inc., BenefitsXML, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the April 14, 2011 Form 8-K |
|
10.5 |
|
|
Note Guarantee by PC Consulting, Inc. is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the April 14, 2011
Form 8-K |
|
10.6 |
|
|
Note Guarantee by BenefitsXML, Inc. is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the April 14, 2011 Form 8-K |
|
10.7 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Stock Option Agreement, dated May 24,
2011, between SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. and William
C. Stone is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
on May 27, 2011 (File No. 001-34675) |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document.** |
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.** |
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.** |
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.** |
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.** |
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. ** |
|
|
|
** |
|
submitted electronically herewith |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under
these sections.
23